Loading...
554 Budd Ave. TO: Acct. 3372 3370 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3373 3373 3373 3372 3372 3521 3521 3521 Items Prel iminary Environmental l!llpé'lct Report Fee ($70.00) Storm Drainage Area Fee per acre ($1,500 R-l; $1,650 Multi-Res.; $1,800 all other) ... CITY CLERK Please collect and receipt for the following monies: P.W. Fiole No. Plan Examination and Construction Inspection Fee (3-1/2% of va 1 ue Tentative Parcel Map Filing Fee ($60.00) Tentative Tract Map Filing Fee ($120.00) Final Parcel Map Filing Fee ($120.00) Final Tract Map Fil ing Fee ($100.00) Vacation of Publ ic Streets and Easements ($270.00) Assessment Segregation or Reapportionment ($250.00 for first plus $80.00 each additional) Lot Line Adjustment Fee ($160.00) Certificate of Compliance ($180.00) Map Revisions to Map Companies ($10.00) Copies of Engineering Maps and Plans ($0.50/SF) Work Area Traffic Control Handbook ($2.00) Project Plans and Specifications ($10.00) Excavation Permit Appl ication Fee ($25.00) Excavation Permit Fee (3-1/2% of value) Cash Deposit Faithful Performance Deposit Maintenance Bond Deposit TOTAL Name ?-I! JP,e.Þ"""'/.'~!; ~ Address PO. d..y /672'- ) 54.. Jùs..i . LIè.. e 2 - 01 ~1ï'=J (2-/) Amount ~2C> ~ t:J $ /Wp; Phone ~"g- 723-2'>/7 Zip ,- FOR Receipt No. /000.s C /TY Amount Paid '~/;2 0 C9 () CLERK ONLY Received by ¿¿ :- -¡<J Date 6 ~ )- þ -?! ;v--- January, 1981 TO: Acct. 3372 3370 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3373 3373 3373 3372 3372 3521 352'1 3521 CITY CLERK Please collect and receipt for the following monies: p.w. File No. - ~HI:S (21) Items Preliminary Environ~nta '~.ct Report ~e ($70.00) Storm Drainage Area Fee per acre ($1,500 R.l; $¡,6~ ~¡ti-Res.; $¡.~ aJ other! Amount Plan Examination and Construction Inspection ~e (3-1/2% of value Tentative Parcel Map Filing Fee ($60.00) Tentative Tract Map Filing Fee ($120.00) Final Parcel Map Filing Fee ($120.00) Final Tract Map Filing Fee ($100.00) ¿O",on ~cation of Public Streets and Ease~nts ($270.00) Assessment Segregation or ReapporUonment ($250.00 for first plus $80.00 each additional) Lot Line Adjustment Fee ($160.00) Certificate of Compliance ($180.00) Map Revisions to Map Companies ($10.00) Copies of Engineering Maps and Plans ($O.SO/SF) Work Area Traffic Control Handbook ($2.00) Project Plans and Specifications ($10.00) . Excavation Permit APPlication Fee ($25.00) Excavation Permit Fee (3-1/2% of value) Cash Deposit Faithful Performance Deposit Maintenance Bond Deposit TOTAL $- 6ð , Of'¡ Name ~ '~A.' fl Address / 5"9, /~ J'fÁA A ¿--:: A .1:21. FOR CITY CLERK ONLY s'- ( - Phone - 2- "7 ? -~~ = Zip - Oy~/2_/ Receipt No. fa:Y S' c:¡¡ Amount Paid ~~û. ('J c) Rece i ved by - Q-?V Da te / - 7 - 8" c2..... Janu;¡"... .L f81t The Buildin~ Wor~s a development corporatIOn ~A\ ,/ .n '.; ".~ ", '...Þ < .~ . ':~.." . ,0'\ "- '.,,;t\ .""'" . April 13, 1984 €'\." " . \.. '", , \:." c ".~;~ "i ' City of Campbell 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, California 95008 Attention: Mr. William Helms Dear Mr. Helms re: Agreement SKNS21 Pursuant to our discussion yesterday I have informed my insurance agent not to renew the bond covering work to be performed under the above referenced Agreement as you are releasing The Building Works from any and all liability under that Agreement. Please prepare the new agreement using the current owners (Clint Gordon Garcia and Lynn Teresa Garcia) in lieu of The Building Works. You can forward that agreement to my office and I will have it executed by all parties. I would also appreciate you handling the necessary paper work to assure our receipt of $437.00 as a reimbursement of Plan Check Fees paid in conjunction with the execution of the original Agreement. Thank you for your courtesy in ROH/srh is issue. 224] Foxworthy Avenue, Suite B San Jose, California 95]24 (408) 559-8850 f_'~ The Bui1din~ Works a development corporation November 14, 1983 City of Campbell 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, California 95008 l) ..... . '" t~ ,""'" f'o . ... "'-C'IV f¡U' , ED! to 7 '- , . - ) ¡o.:J FU' / ,', c. dJ DZ¡r¡ £N GI ív~i:R~;:s Attention: Mr. Joseph Elliott Public Works Director Dear Mr. Elliott re: SNKS 21 560 Kenneth Avenue As you will recall, my company has developed a home at the above referenced site with the condition street improvements be constructed. On March 22, 1983, I executed an Agreement with the City of Campbell cover- ing certain improvements and bonded the probable work required. On July 20, 1983, I wrote you a letter pursuant to our discussions and requested some immediate response to my proposal. None was forthcoming. In early October I again discussed the dilemma with you over the phone. The coversation ended with your agreement to reveiw the status and con- tact me with a solution. I have heard nothing further from you on this matter, yet the City continues to "hold" my property from release for PG & E connection. I strongly feel I have complied with the conditions placed on my project and suggest the City of Campbell is acting illegally in ignoring the issue while refusing to release the property. I hope we can resolve the matter without returning to the elected n 0 with my proposal for a 2241 Foxworthy Avenue, Suite B San Jose, California 95124 (408) 559-8850 The subject home has been sold and escrow is about to c!ose. As such, you can understand and appreci- ate my need for immediate action. s cc: John Marsha!! Collins, Esquire ROH/srh THE BUILDING WORKS a development corporation 2241 Foxworthy Avenue; Suite B San Jose, California 95124 (408) 559-8850 July 20, 1983 'IF.(''/: -, ..- I V'""- cD ll[f! 'v, P¿: '/~UJ /"/.11'-;;""; .' . .";11: : ¡¡is ""~i...".r'¡G City of Campbell 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, California 95008 Attention: Mr. Joseph Elliott Public Works Director Dear Mr. Elliott re: SNKS 21 At that time we last discussed the matter of street improvements to our property at 560 Kenneth Avenue, Campbell, pursuant to the Agreement identified by the above referenced number which I have executed, I was to obtain bid information for the proposed improve- ments as evidence the work could be accomplished at a cost less than the required bond. Due to my involve- ment in a 24 unit project in San Jose, I did not follow through in the timely manner I had expected. Be that as it may, I have now done some investigative work and present the following for your consideration: Since the City could not provide me with the extent or type of improvements required, I was unable to have any preliminary plans prepared as a basis for bidding. As such, my þids were obtained with the following assummed specifications provided for 71.5 feet of frontage along Kenneth Avenue: SIDEWALK --- 5! feet to face of curb; 2 feet of gutter; 1 driveway approach STREET --- 1,269 square feet from the center line to the face of gutter When I requested specific bids from companies, explain- ing my needs, most were reluctant to supply the inform- ation without plans, etc. I was unable to obtain any bids for the street work, so I took my information from the 1983 Bank of America Cost Study (enclosed) and added a cost factor for a single property verus a tract project of approximately 40 homes. The bids I obtained for the sidewalk are enclosed. The resulting costs for me to do the work is: SIDEWALKS STREET $3,761.00 $1,497.42 $5,258.42 $ 525.00 $5,783.42 CONTINGENCY As stated previously my preference is to do the work and be finished with the matter. As I understand the sit- uation, without action and determinations by the various City bodies, I cannot be given the information needed to proceed with the work, so I propose the following: I retain the Bond now in existance for an additional year beyond its current expir- ation of April 1984. If by that time the requirements for improvements are not avail- able and/or if it has not been established the whole area is to be improved, I will be relieved of all future liability in this matter and the money I paid for Plan Check Fees, etc. ($437.00) will be refunded. If within the above time frame the conditions are determined, I will do the work to like- wise conclude the matter. If you would like to discuss this proposal further prior to reaching a conclusion, please call my office and we can establish a convenient time to meet. Thank you for your cooperation this proposal. ing quickly to ROH/slf ENCLOSURES: as noted (!). CITY OF CAMPBELL MEMORANDUM To: BUILDING DEPARTMENT Date: lÁÁ CLÆ.._~ 3/ /cr ~ j / - From: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Subject: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS ---------------------------------------------------------- The requirements of the Public Works Department have been satisfied for the following development: APPLICANT 1:., b< ~-t 10\- "k l. <' -' ~ BUILDING ADDRESS !'-(p(ð <: n n ¿ + ~~~~~~ ~~~mOR'S g~h,", . f 1D 1-"- ~ - 33 APPROVAL NUMBER PUBLIC WORKS FILE NUMBER S \î k-.r ( 1-1 JOSEPH ELLIOTT DIRECTO~ OF PUBLIC W~KS By: \,~ ~- / \ Date: J - J ( - fÇ J ~ (408) 559-8850 R. t (' ~' . , ... t. , .. ," .... ,í::D IM,1,.: . "-'111' ;> I "'-:" Î:.:./ j-t;;: Î- £11-""'(' t. -b:.~,,:_'," ", THE BUILDING WORKS a development corporation 2241 Foxworthy Avenue; Suite B San Jose, California 95124 March 23, 1983 - City of Campbell 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, California 95008 Attention: Mr. Joseph Elliott, Director of Public works Dear Mr. Elliott re: Lands of Bruehl 560 Kenneth Avenue, Campbell As you are aware, the required documents covering the "yet to be designed" street improvements across the front of the above referenced location were brought to the Public Works Department this date: 1) 2) 3) Performance Bond for $12,500.00 Agreement properly executed A check in the amount of $437.00, covering the Inspection Fees It is my hope you will use deligence to bring this matter to the point where I may proceed in the actual construction of the improve- ments at the earliest possible date. As we have discussed, I wish to perform this work while the new home at the above location is under construction; thus, keeping supervision and costs at a minimum. As I see the situation, it appears that I am forcing the City's decis- ion in this matter, one which may be more appropriately made at a later date. Be that as it may, I am sure you can understand and apprec- iate my position of wanting to do the actual work now at a substantial savings from the $12,500.00 estimate by Mr. Helms. please keep me informed of all meetings, etc. that will be scheduled to ultimately decide on the improvement desired. Thank you for your cooperation in es President ROH/bs I TO: Acct. 3372 3370 Œß' 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3372 3373 3373 3373 3372 3372 3521 3521 3521 ,- ., , . S:.""ì1I K S 2- / p . W. FILE NO. CITY CLERK Please collect and receipt for the following monies: Items Preliminary Environmental Impact Report Fee ($200) Storm Drainage Area Fee per acre (R-l, $1,875; Multi-Res., $2,060; all other, $2,250) Plan Examination and Construction Inspection Fee (3-1/2% of value) Tentative Parcel Map Filing Fee ($85) Tentative Tract Map Filing Fee ($170) Final Parcel Map Fil ing Fee ($170) Final Tract Map Filing Fee ($140) Vacation of Public Streets and Easements ($380) Assessment Segregation or Reapportionment ($350 for first plus $110 each additional) Lot Line Adjustment Fee ($225) Certificate of Compliance ($250) Copies of Engineering Maps and Plans ($.50 per sq.ft.) Work Area Traffic Control Handbook ($2); additional ($1.50) Project Plans and Specifications ($10) Excavation Permit Appl ication Fee ($35) Excavation Permit Fee (3-1/2% of value) Cash Deposit Faithful Performance Deposit Maintenance Bond Deposit TOTAL Name ~~ W(J'} £ Add res s '2- 2- V / Fd?£ lA~ Phone 5.r FOR CITY CLERK ONLY Receipt No. Amount Paid /!)/ó 3 yf~ ¥ ~?I (f~ Received by Date Amount ¿/370Q $ ))9 - ¿7 ?S?J Zip 9') 12- sL- , July, 1982 , Surface Cons truct i on Clearing and Grubbing Sawcut Concrete Concrete Remova 1 Curb and Gutter Removal Inlot Drain with Pipe Curb and Gutter Sidewalk Driveway Approach Handi cap Ramp Barri cade A.C. Paver'ent inc. Excavation Adjust Manhole to Grade Adj us t Handho 1 e to Grade Monument Box w Monument Street Tree (15 gallon) Pavement Stri pi ng Pavement Legends Stop, Street Name or Other Sign Pavement Markers Pavement Key Cut Street Lighting E1ectro1 ier Conduit Conductor, pai r Pull Box Storm Drainage 12" or 15" RCP lB" or 21" RCP Street Inlet Manhole Break and Enter Manhole Revi sed 1/20/82 7/,S"LF @ ""-:S.3 Lu...>, 3uIn L.F. @ $ 3.50 S.F. @ 2.50 lo F. @ 8.00 EA. @ 400 .00 71,S loF. @ 12,00 2.fÞ7 S.F. @ 4.00 I ~O S.F. @ 6.00 EA. @ 600 .00 loF. @ 40,00 (12.131 S.F.) (S1.10) 1...£_") EA. @ 400.00 EA. @ 300.00 EA. @ 300.00 EA. @ 175.00 loF. @ 0,80 EA. @ 100.00 EA. @ 100,00 EA. @ 12.00 L. F. @ 5.00 EA. @ 3,000.00 loF. @ 9.00 loF. @ 3.00 EA. @ 250.00 loF. @ 45.00 loF. @ 55.00 EA. @ 1,000.00 EA. @ 1,200.00 EA. @ 500 .00 TOTAL ESTIMATE USE FOR BOND Date "3 - \ - ð" "::!:. ~"f' = $ 2. 3 ~o 85S 1C>ç.¡" /pßO 7~78" $ 12. 444 $ 1:2. 50 'D í CITY OF CAMPBELL ~ .1 ¡ --- - ----- / 75 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 378-8141 Department: Publ ic Works ¡ . ; Snki?ù! ~- r¡~(d-t - February 3, 1983 Mr. Robert O. Hughes 2241 Foxworthy Avenue, Suite 3 San Jose, CA 95124 SUBJECT: LANDS OF BRUEHL SOUTHEAST CORNER BUDD AND KENNETH AVENUES Dear Mr. Hughes: At the City Council meeting of February 1, 1983, the Council re- viewed your written request of January 14, 1983, wherein you asked the Council to waive the requirement to install street improvements along the Kenneth Avenue frontage of the newly created lot. The Council referred your request to the Planning Commission, to be included in their review of the Circulation Element of the General Plan. If, however, an appl ication is made for a building permit on this new lot prior to any determinations being made by the Planning Commission, you could again request a waiver from the Council. Please feel free to contact me at your convenience if you have any further questions regarding this matter. Very truly yours, ß~~ ~~«tf Director of Public Works JEll e cc: Edward G. Schill ing, City Manager Phyllis Acker, City Clerk --------- '\ \ ! : I \ ~!~? 7 Item B-1 ~ I:. U '-- . .' JAN 17 198: CITY ClERK'~ ûfh~l January 14, 1983 ~. .. City CoW1ci1 Ci ty of Campbell 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, California 95008 Attention: Ms. Phyllis Acker, City Clerk Dear CoW1cil Members re: PM 82-01, Lands of Bruehl Sq~~ea$t,to~er,Budd a~q,Kenneth Avenues 'T parcel map for the above referenced lot'split was approved by the Planning Commission on February 23', 1982. The conditions for the proposed split were met subsequent to that meeti~g, and the final parcel map was recorded on August 2,'1982. As a potential developer of the newly created lot, ~ woUld like to appear before you and seek waiver of the requirement to install street improvements across the, front of the lot'in conjW1ction with building a home on the prOperty. Please notify my office of a date and time I can present my case on this issue. ' . "-, ,,', ,,' ' ' , . -', ' ,; , . ' , , Thank you for your courtesY,.an~ c opèration~' . , - " ',' " ' , , ' , " .' , , " > ' , , . ' ' ' ! " " ,', '- ' . " ~. -.', ,~, ,.,.': -:,',',;,' : - " ',',:'.; . " - , , ' "'" .', ..' .. , - . , . ,,' .."' , , ',.',' ~ .' . " '. ROH/bs " " , :/ " Robert o. 'Hug s '.. "~' >: . :".: ,', "".;'.. ,,~,::,~., '. ..¡.: '2241 Fo , 't.h A' "e."Suitë'B , f',:," ',~ ",,"..';.,'..: ',';',',:-.~~!o,';', '~¡;;,':";-.-. ,', ~.",~o,r, ~,nu..." ...~~,:".."'",", ','co:' ,c.w~, Bruehl:"';',~:~:~':"",,~,~~,}",,'San'Jose' Califomia 95124..'.':' ,:., .. ' . " ,r, - . " : : ' " ,', .,' . . - '-".. ,,' , ",' : ....' '. , .. ._, -.',. ' . " .. - . ,;;.. ,. . , @) Item B-1 MEMORANDUM CITY OF CAMPBELL To: Edward G. Schilling, City Manager Date: Janua ry 24, 1983 F,om, ¡I,-;eph Elliott. Director of Pub Ii c Works Subject: ¿ÓMMUNICATION FROM ROBERT O. HUGHES SOUTHEAST CORNER OF KENNETH AND BUDD AVENUES ---------------------------------------------------------- On February 22, 1982 a parcel map was approved by the Planning Commission allowing the property at the southeast corner of. Kenneth Avenue and Budd Avenue to be separated into two parcels. That map was recorded on August 2, 1982. On March 24, 1982, in response to an inquiry from a real estate firm, a letter was drafted by the staff indicating that the issuance of a build- ing permit for the undeveloped new parcel required a commitment for street improvements. This requirement is pursuant to Sections 20.36.010 and 20.36.020 of the Campbell Municipal Code. These sections require that all of the provisions of the subdivision ordinance, including ded- ication and street improvements, be imposed for any site development requiring the issuance of a building permit. Accordingly, street im- provements are routinely required as a condition of development of newly created parcels. It should be noted that no applications have been received to date for any building permits to develop the parcel in question. BH/le ( CITY OF CAMPBEll ELL! on March 24, 1982 " .' " ¡ ") < !" G L - L' ,- ,... -:::-~~~~;~::~::l - -- ,-~------\- ----' , ----¡ --I '-~=____d : ~,--I ~^' \~c-~_~II f:c,II':, 75 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 378-8141 -"- Department: Public Works Ms. Donna Michael Con tempo Realty 10020 North De Anza Boulevard Cupertino, CA 95014 RE: BRUEHL PARCEL MAP S/E CORNER BUDD AND KENNETH Dear Ms. Michael: The preliminary parcel map for the referenced lot split was approved on February 23,1982. This approval will expire one year later if the final parcel map has not been filed though a time extension may be requested. Anyone purchasing the newly created lot should expect to be required to install street improvements across their frontage as a condition of approval of any development of the lot. Very truly yours, JOSEPH ELL! OTT DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS 1 (JAAA .LoV Il- '\ --- {y James Penoyer Engineering Tech I JP: 1 p .. . <, -- -- ,,",' MEMORANDUM @u CITY OF CAMPBEll /' To Arthur A. Kee, Planning Director J~~liott, Director of Public Works Date: ¿; j-.... 82... From: Subject: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP LANDS OF C.t.....,/-..r Iv. 8,.........<1.1 .c.1 UK A.P.N. ~oSl -~~ -33 ._-----------------~-------------------------------------- This office recommends approval of the proposal, subject to the following conditions: 1. File a parcel map in accordance with the provisions of the State Subdivision Map Act. ._d- --_..---....,-..--~.,~..........,-_...,....o.....~,...~..,...",...-_...-,....,~ __.'0.. -,--~-,,--~'-""'~""..'-"'-""""-'-"'~'"