The URL can be used to link to this page

Miscellaneous File-1977-1983 L . APR 1 Lt1983 ....-..... ........... Û ' ........... J)J.. ¡ ........... . . ........... ; ........... ........... ........... ........... ........... April 13, 1983 CITY OF CAMP8EL.L ::::::::::: PLANNING DEPARTMENT:: : : : : : : : : : ~ Mr. Phil Stafford Department of Planning City of Campbell 74 North Central Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 Dear Mr. Stafford: As I mentioned in our April 11th telephone conversation Mr. Steve McVay has made an offer to purchase The Factory Shopping Mall in Campbell. The seller's primary concern was not the offered price or terms, which seemed generally acceptable but rather the feasibility of Mr. McVay's plans for the property. Mr. McVay would like to convert the entire property to com- mercial condominiums and convert some space to office condos. Mr. McVay understands that he will need the approval of the City of Campbell to do this and that formal approval will require his compliance with Campbell's zoning and building regulations. It is our hope that we can get a preliminary letter from you or someone in a position of authority stating the Cities general attitude, disposition and receptivity to this plan. We under- stand this letter cannot be interpreted as formal approval. Your letter, along with letters of intent from lending insti- tutions, estimates from building contractors and other infor- mation will be used by Mr. McVay and the sellers to assess the feasibility of converting the property to commercial condo- m i n i urn s . Thank you in advance for your assistance. If you have any que s t ion sIc a n be rea c h e d at (408) 288 - 5800, S t eve Mc Va y can be reached at (408) 371-4083. The letter should be sent to Mr. Steve McVay at 960 Stonehurst Way, Campbell, CA 95008. Cordially, /~~~ \lO.ø; C. Binen Owner/Realtor LCB/bjg cc Mr. Steve McVay first american building. 675 north first street. suite 1108 . san jose, california 95112 . (408) 288-5800 TREPEL CLARK ß MAN LEY ATTORNEYS JOHN W. CLARK. ANTHONY J. TREPEL STEPHEN V. MANLEY DANIEL S. MOUNT GEORGE M. KRAW MICHAEL J. KORDA UNION BANK BUILDING. SUITE 850 99 ALMADEN BOULEVARD (408) 275-0501 TELEX 171-573 "HANSEATIC' SAN JOSE. CALIFORNIA 95113 ~ œ rrn ~ ~WŒ ~ MAR 21 1980 March 20, 1980 CITY OF CAMPBELL ;¡L.ANNINQ DEPARTMENT Planning Director and Members of the City Planning Commission Campbell City Campbell, California 95008 Gentlemen and Ladies: This letter is written pursuant to that item of the March 18, 1980 meeting of the Planning Commission concerning Rascals Discotheque located in The Factory complex in Campbell. I have reviewed the material that was submitted to the Planning Commission by the staff and find among the material several items that are in error: There is a "flier" for a ladies only show featuring male bikini dancers and a reproduction of a letter dated January 30, 1980 addressed to the City Council requesting male dancing. It should be noted by the staff and members of the City Planning Commission that the request for male dancing was withdrawn by the applicant after discussion with the city manager. The Planning Commission should disregard any requests that were made for male dancing as that is not intended to be any part of the entertainment that is going to be featured at the Rascals Discotheque. The discotheque intends to continue with format as previously established, which is disco dancing interspersed with tasteful, live entertainment but not male dancing. If there are any questions in any regard please contact the undersigned or Mr. Harry Evans directly. . I . III ... I. I . C II , I . .. CORPORATE OFFICES .111 BROADWAY AT JACK LONDON SQUARE. OAKLAND. CALIFORNIA 94607. (415) 834-4900 þ,1arch 11, 1980 fD) ~~ ¡T~ r~j i, ., 7 Lf\\ L:~I\X ~R . '.,). 10"'\"'1 ""t-\ 1 I"~ I..)ij- Mr. Arthur Kee Planning Director City of Campbell 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 C ! TY 0 ;':' r;. ;',; .., .' .._c-_.. i , ,_/\ ~, ~..: : ~: c= T) c:::"\f', ,.;.~ :::. ;'.~ T Re: P.D. 79-13; The Factory Center Dear Art: This letter will set forth my understanding of the somewhat confusing City Council resolution last night regarding our proposed revision of the space utilization plan for The Factory Center. 1. The total gross floor area permitted under P.D. 79-13 shall be 97,960 square feet. 2. The total area for food or beverage usage shall continue to be limited to the current maximum allowable area of 40,840 square feet. However, this limitation may later be expanded by 6,918 square feet to 47,748 square feet, as proposed by The Factory, when usage stan- dards are approved by the City Council to insure that the additional food or beverage space is not used for additional nightclub activity. 3. The Factory shall submit a revised space utilization plan which clarifies the location of food or beverage usage under both the 40,840 ft2 and the 47,758 ft2 limitations. The Factory may change these use designations for particular spaces from time to time by written notification to you provided the applicable food or beverage limitations are not exceeded. If your understanding differs from this, please let me know immediately. Very truly yours, THE Frl° ,~~ a Cal?Or ia~ed partnership By: i -~ l Ronald \r.. Peck Executive Vice President Brondon Corporation, General Partner lab 11.1111. I.IPOIITI.. CORPORATE OFFICES .111 BROADWAY AT JACK LONDON SQUARE. OAKLAND. CALIFORNIA 94607. (415) 834-4900 ¿/ /~ð'//S February 12,1980 ~ Œ~~nWJŒ ~ FEB 1 3 1980 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING DEPAFlTMENí Planning Commission City of Campbell 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 Re: Agenda Item in Next Tueday's Meeting for Discussion of Use Permit Compliance of Premises Known as Rascal's Dear Commissioners: The Factory woul like to request a continuance of the agenca item for discussion of use permit compliance of the establishment known as Rascal's from next Tuesday's meeting to the March 18th meeting. Because of the complexity of the situation and the very serious nature of the planning commission inquiry, we want to make sure that all parties involved have the opportunity to be present together with their respective legal counsels. Neither Don Winchester nor I will be able to attend the upcoming meeting due to scheduling conflicts, and the mid-March meeting was preferable for the other parties. Ronald L. Pe k Secretary/Tr asurer Brondon Corpo ation, Managing General Partner The Factory, Ltd. cc: Harry Evans, Avanessian Enterprises, Inc. Trepel & Clark, Attorneys at Law The Party Helpers McGarey & Torrey, Attorneys at Law Burden, Reis & Aiken, Attorneys at Law RLP/an CC: Police Chief f'- ¡' ". I. : . 'J¡- ~. t . . "',' \ -. I " I ~ .I- ;'RÉCE'V¡~ " JAN 3 0 1980 an fUlrJ IfCI t?1 /1\/ . . (. ~ -,;/ . -" . '. ~,- ._,-_.J City Council, City of Campbell, Campbell, California 95008. 30 January 1980 ~ ~A~ ~.uí~~ ill) Dear Council Members: CITY OF" CAMPBELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT "'. The undersigned is the president of the corporation which oper- ates Rascals Discotheque which is located in The Factory complex in Campbell, California. As you are no doubt aware, through the efforts of our corporation a,nd its management, ~he Discotheque has been "saved" from in- ~olvency and a potential liquidation in bankruptcy. Extensive renovations and upgrading of the Discotheque has been accom- plished and it now features tasteful live and recorded entertain- ment and is attracting an ever-larger number of adults who enjoy the entertainment and the backgammon club. Obviously, the City of C~mpbe1l benefits from the increased revenues that inure to the City from the taxes and because of the strict dress code, high level of management and control, the City has no enforce- ment problens whatsoever at the Discotheque. Recently, the Discotheque scheduled a show that was requested by a number of its women patrons and one that is featured at The Cabaret located on Saratoga Avenue and at Flapper McGee's (formerly The Farmer's Union) on San Pedro Street. Basically the show is one of live entertainment with several men dancinq to programmed discotheque music and a partial disrobing in synchronization to the music not unlike hundreds of shows in which women do the same type of disrobing. All of this type of entertainment is obviously done in a tasteful way and within the standards of decency that are set for each community and within the guidelines set down by the various regulatory agencies, court~ and appellate courts and it is not intended that men, performing the same activity as women, would transcend these guidelines. A member of the police department of Campbell recently notified the undersigned on behalf of our corporation that our proposed entertainment featuring men would not be permitted within the City of Campbell without Council approval and might be violative of Campbell city ordinances. , .- L - ,/ ~.~ ~~:' . (./..(.. .' ~ ~~-:', ~. "L, - /; -{ L ¿c, .' ,¡.. ,'\. ,"" /.",1".'. 'L.--' ¡.. / . / ,<'..~. 7 L.--<:. ','~ i"1 .'. (r,/C,-. ~v , l '\ ¡' \.I ,i' ll~ ;¡ V \ \ ' "I_, ", \ i...... .i,l 'V __h____- City Council, City of Campbell 30 January 1980 Page 2 .. W~ have,' with our counsel, reviewed what we think might be the approJr i ate ordl J¡ances ,::lJ1d bel i eve that they would not be ap- plic~blc and would be discriminatory. However, we believe we have enjoyed a good rapport with the City of Campbell, do not wish to feature entertainment which could be considered ques- tionable without the prior approval and gujdance of the City Council of the City of Ca~pbell and, therefore, respectfully suggest that the matter be placed on the City Council agenda Ù,t its earliest convenience so that we can have some declara- tion as to what the thinking of the Council is and what legal basis the Council rests their decision upon. -. Our proposed show obviously does have appeal to a large variety of the public, does not transcend the tasteful standards of the citizens of Campbell and will not appeal to a purient interest. Therefore, we respectfully suggest that the Council favorably consider our request. We are prepared to I'.\eet with the Council, at their convenience, present evidence of the type of show and follow whatever lawful guidelines the Council wishes to impose. :~,:~fUll: I~m~~ed. / () <-"- '. (, (.' , L"-' lJ H~'ry Evans, President, Rascals, Inc. ITEM NO.9 December 17, 1979 Dan Campo s Vice Chairman - Planning Commission City of Campbell 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, California 95008 Subject: PD 7f-12- The Factory Dear Mr. Campos, We are very concerned with increased vandalism and litter in the downtown Campbell area. During the past few months there have been many broken windows, benches torn apart, many broken and discarded bottles and paint sprayed on the buildings. This is happening all along Campbell Avenue. in the parking areas behind the buildings and in the breezeways. We feel that an increase in the food and beverage space in the Factory will create additional problems with the increased night time activity. Please let us know if we can be of any assistance. Thank you. ,'~!. 4/ ////) .¡' Ç-/ f/ ./ / . /.)<;/; /.>~.'.~< / - ]Z:-,'; L--/. ~ .. ,,~. " r\ ~ "~ .}........__.~._~"'~ J.....\--. ~...,.,.. ~""f""- .~. ¡-. ( \ \ JLkJ1 ¿ ¡ .'. ,t, 'ÞIL/1-tr. <~~;::'\ . ~ / . . ,.,." ......-/ ~.. ~ .,,/' .....4/ .' // , cd/' , . ,/ / / ! - I , ,j/, ,.J ; ¡LL" ,-,,"-V--.¡; . ~' Sincerely. - /- -/. - :5 ~ E~[";?.-.~ /~ 9---- '".(~ ~~ , pc ~ \~~f/r;: ~~-Z '3 q ú- r ". li {i. 'I ~ l~ -i" {(' ~{j\..1 .. ,.1' 5' ¿/ 1:.:, ('I' v:tv,- ý)~ i j tJ Í/ L - , - 33'-1 C ~; t3ê " C~, hi,fi } tL ~\-~ p" - ,_. .!//.3 /::./,//1 ,/.', /'(' - {{.,c/}/,¡;,1..¿L Ir- [=~' -t.;i ,- /~.'.'1 ../~.,L.' i/1{./& ,~þ ~. r ?(~~ cc: Bob stey ns. City Manager Don Burr, Chief of Police Art Kee. Planning Director -!-t:/ , I ~ ...,.,.. , /1 't {è-U¡ /' ¿"1: /1 P (>.~ I Page 2 Ií , /1 r-, ;~ d(r(L1~ J~~ ¿! ~~ ~ (~~" ~ ~ <: t \ ß Vt. \' L VII IN v' ( 0 . ¡-f 3 l'¡ ~, V ¡. I .01 "...j i4 (J --^-. ç 11-,/ ¿ t 1/- l-À> A / ~.-¡// > ~ /( . < ,mH""). re;;>' r...i/~ ?¿~rr/C~c-¿él 3/ . ~7, ~¡L:/1 C-¡X ~~)o../V,¿~., / ' , .!"rs-- ( <- C' at-!- ( p.i{;Léd<-z MEMORANDUM CITY OF CAMPBELL. T (J. Planning Department Date: November 13,1979 From: Michael Kotowski Sign Advisor ~ ŒN~v ~ ~ ~~ IDJ Subject: SA 79-62 CITY OF CAMPBELL - .- - u - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PLARN'!¡;:r¡T D[:1DAR'fM5N=r - - - - --- - / ' / /~,,( y-, :/~(I /I~l ¿In ;;:,,£-/0/, ,/ "0..'// c¿l~7<"rfr~.,,/- ;O'~ ,./,;.. .,'1 + r'So \... I' ,-.k Lc ~--<. ¡- , - /C'--' U(2-U ä rk 5 .#7j,/~ >;.?1L-<~ H--<"f'e /'rc/,c",,-c-,--( ../ Q Ç. Cé -It -PC( y~ I'- 1-'-1 cur u.. Ú '-h. 4c!:.p;...Y!rs, e -lie F /51 t+/é"¿ I ¿ ,/Ie ,.Ya. ,~, P--1 <0' ~ ':I '. / ¡; p ¿,-~.;;./ ¡. u. ,~( "")'C ð //-2<' '-f,~ //, /(u/~v'Jlu M¿"-' -pht",/),p/ , / / ó' r J ( Ì-I~~ dA <'f -1£ ¿ "<1'" t ,< e'-i,;..:..,. h-. <" ,j.'-l h ¿ ~ J.r"c /9 -(/ 0-,.,- '/ ¿? J c' :i: ~/ ~ P . ~ ,/ .<- Þ:j Y e:;:¡- (l h"-f HA / ~ ,,/ <-~ !eci -c.' t t-c, ,,- -"- :¡ ¿.;; .~I;;{~þ¿L¿f_"~ /~d/¿.~~{::;¿ I 'it ZL:i- y-12 ( -- ( é'~ ¿;C"V(¿" )...iA:i.Æ " \1 C"~ ,: (j)[ (7 ¿;. Y!r"f~ ~"J;C.é Ie, "7 .J¿.,c",c-¡;" ;,. <-u "/(; 6"¿C" . f 't¿;'::L/ / .~ '~2"Î ~:j " '1- J¥ ¿¿4 { ~ '/c.¡r 1h7 '~7 it /¡(, ~ y' þU eA-~) /ì..¡;:lt-.~-?- -¡; ~~t'ci . '( - "". .... (\ <-J.' . \-:J )/1 \X:;j ::..~- //~~¿~ /) c~ L r . ~ "'--1' (CCLt.--'1 £11-1 .. . CI.".,)OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA tNIT1AL STUDY. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM - TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Date Filed: GENEBAL I NFO RMA T ION: 1. liame and address of developer or project sponsor: ihe. r~Y} Li".r!." ~'3> so",,-~ Ce.V\~1 AvcV\v.e. I ~J>bc..l} ) CA 'isoo@ 2. Address of project: 33 ~ q~ So~~ ~tv~, AJe } ~Zb~ll Assessor's Block and Lot Number Lf.t3-0ì-C>~2. ~ 41~-Oì-OG.(Þ ,'~ 'Name. address. and telephone number of person to be contacted . e~~~~g ~~~roject: (&.ttS) ß a"f-LfC\oo _B,,"o~c>~ CoY"por~tio'^ I l\ \ B,,"o~~'Y ~ J~ LD~~ St. ,D;a.kl~ 4. Indicate number of the permit application for the project to which this form pertains: s. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: v..oV\e. Y"e."y..~",c:J.. .""'0 V"ev\se. e.}(.'is+\V\9 ~\:>v\""eð. ð.e.ve...(Df>~~ \As.~e. Existing zoning district: PI' D - ïì - '20 6. 7. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): CO~\,^\Aeð ""-Se -S ~ :s~\:;¡.\+y c.e.V'\'Tc.v- ;..,i;;:J,',<;!v/?';;'f;.;","';". . ::.)14>;2!:!';~::..:1.OJECT.. DESCRIPTION (ATTACHED ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY) 8. Site 8ize. -f{>\"'t>ii~;.e.ty 3. \'?> ~cV"c.s 9. Square footage. «=\1, G\G,O \'V\~-\>N\~""'" sct."",~""e. ~~~e. 10. Itumberof floors of construction. b:as\~'~ ~ ~-tÞ.r.\C6 11. Amount of off-street parking pr~vided. P~.,.\c:.~"'6 t>~~~.\c..+ ~" 'A.J Loc::a,\ \W\~"o~e.W\e.-."t t>\s+or",:t' ~. 27 12. Attach plans. sc.e. ~e.V\se.ð. sp:.c.e. """~\ \\.-z:.>hò", t\~ 13. Proposed 8cheduling. ~ct :;).f>pll'c..:>4øte,. 14. Associated projects. PI' 0,. 78-l q (30 Sø\"\'~ Ce.V\~.>\ ~ "'~'^~) . is loc..>~ OY'\ ~E. a>YV\e.v- c.ç. t>.rc,~ C,+y b.,.\"e. 15. Anticipated incremental development. c;c>~~~v.c.'\io'^. of ~~Y'~ '\MC;2.."'2..':>Ñ\~V\~ '>¥'e.~ i£ d.c.p~~~ þ", +e.V\~'\' ð.e.V'Y\~~ 1 of 3 pages . '. . ,/ I 16. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household 8ize expected. ~/A 17. If co~rcial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of lales area, and loading facilities. £~e.c.\~\~Y. c.e.-+e.(" W-\~ \"c.Cjio"Q.\ øv\e~+~t'1DII\.- w,\,~}(',W\~ of et,,""O ::5q.\o\.~"e .fc.e,'t to+~, ...ye.~ 18. If industrial. indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. t..)Ar 19. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employ- Dent per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. ~/A 20. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning application, 8;ate this and indicate clearly why the application is required. tJ(A Are the following ite~ applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all ite~ checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). Yes No X 21. -- X 22. -- .2L 23. -- L 24. ~ 25. ~ 26. - L 27. - :2: ~~: 2S... 30. - ..A- 31. -X 32. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes or hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or gro\md water quality or quanity, or alteration of existing drain- age patterns. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration ,- levels in the vicinity. Site on filled land or on slope of lot or more. Use of disposal of potentially hazardous ~teria1s, 8uch as toxic substances, flammables or explosives. Substantial change in demand for uunicipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.) Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.) Relationship to a larger project or aeries of projects. 2 of 3 pages .-.-.-.....,.---.-.-.. .-."".'" ..-.' . -"-----,-",,._,~,~,"....-. . D \..J ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 33. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, 80il 8tability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or 8cen1c ..pec~s. Describe any existin~ 8tructures on the 8ite, and the use of the 8tructures. Attach photor,raphs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. :>\vc.~y oV\.ç\,c. w\~ c.l+-t'Of c>w\p\øc.\r 34. Describe the .urroundin~ properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment bouses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontare, set-back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photo- graphs of the vicinity.. Snapshots or. polaroid pho~. ",il.1 ,e accepted. .a.\""c.~y 0'" .f\tc.. ~t""'" C\~ ø-f ~fk\! . CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the statements furnished above an41n ~be attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability. and tbatthe facts, statements, and information pres e are true and correct to the best of my knowledfe and belief ~D"eW\þe.V' ,~) \ qì9 bate . gna ture ~o~ l. . e.c.k ~~r~~e¿1 ~e...d T\-\E FA-CTq2..y, L- '11>'.. )tor 3 of 3 pages -..---- ----_._.~- ~-"-, .-.. -~.: . --.,...-.... . ...-.....-....-.,.... ~~ ~ ENTERTAINMENT CALENDAR September 20 Thursda y 11 :30-2:30 pm September 22 Saturday 12:00-5:00 pm September 23 Sunday 12:00-5: 00 pm September 27 Thursday 12:00-2: 00 pm September 29 Saturday 12:00-5: 00 pm September 30 Sunday 12: 00-5: 00 pm October 4 Thursday 12: 00-2: 00 pm October 6 Saturday 12 :00-5: 00 pm October 7 Sunday 12:00-5: 00 pm October 11 Thursday 12: 00-5: 00 pm October 13 Saturday 12:00-5: 00 pm October 14 Sunday 12:00-5:00 pm October 18 Thursday 12:00-2:00 pm October 19 Friday 4:00-8:00 pm October 20 Saturday 11: 00-5: 00 pm October 21 Sunday 12:00-5: 00 pm October 25 Thursda y 12:00-2:00 pm October 27 Saturday 12: 00-5: 00 pm October 28 Sunday 12:00-5:00 pm Creole (bl uegra s s) Dr. Zarchon's Band Tom Striker's Jazz Band Swallow Tail The Mark Ford Band Gatos (flute and guitar) The Magnolia Jazz Band The Tuxedo Ja zz Band Joe Ferrara I Gene Knauer Tom and Theresa Shagbark Hickory (bluegrass) Ron Dow and The Country Sounds Chanter The Pat Ireland Trio The Toons The Amici Quintet The Mission Strings Orchestra The San Jose Woodwinds The Classical Brass Quintet Done Gone (bluegrass) Shagbark Hickory Wild Prarie Rose (country) Professor Plum's Dixeland Band Overland Stage Co I (barber- shop singing) Peninsula Banjo Band Get Together (country) Duke Robert's Country Band Southwind Ensemble (classical) Skip and Marty The Magnolia Jazz Band Neely's Royal Society Jazz Orchestra Free Music ~ R (jì) JÇ n ~n . . . . . . . every weekend and every Thursday enjoy great music ft.tifQ,JI te; ~ w œ 0 . . . . . . . all enterta inm ent will ta ke pI a ce in The Factory's out oor áil(J>Ttßej! $7.9 ~ CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT 93 S. Central Avenue. Campbell. California 95008. (408) 374-4650 " -._.h'_.~._---".._." . -----."" ... . /ð /'/-/-2- '"""" Dol' C"",., 0, A""..", THE FACTORY SPECIALTY_CENTER___- Revised Space Utilization Plan(~)___-- -- -- , ~- ~c== Z<O! >w ---- -.-- ~~ _Sp_a~_,,_- 'S2!rr:e!!~reI1llI!~ U i No. ' 5 [, - Reta~l or offic In use _existing- _future- _tot~1--- -- TOTAL area ¡mezzanine area 10 11 ¡ I' , I i~i=T?:IH~-fif I 15O0~lL,LJ i I 'j"'ot-~n ,136 I 826 16524 l' --- ~~= r-~=~;9:;:- i: 2438 I _n___--;:--_---- -;----.-JI I I ,i-!, i 1 ! 12 13 1\ 20 21 _E.'~_L 2' 72 25 74 26 I 75 Vacant }7:!:-76 I, -'lh~K"ctO.IT--QUi~e- 28 78 J';¡C.ilIlL__- 29 80 Acorn Gallery 30 82 Vacant 31', 84 The _Company Store 32 33 3' NO. 413-07-066: ' \OJ! ____n_-_-- - - _n - --- ) K LAW OFFICES OF Jesse W. Jack 1570 THE ALAMEOA-SUITE 101 SAN JOSE. CALIFORNIA 95126 TEL.EPHONE: (4081 298-7900 JESSE W. JACK DAVID J. RUDE SHARif E. REY PARALEGAL October 12, 197~ Œ ~ Œ ~\VJœ ~ OCT 1 3197B CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNIND DEPARTMENT City of Campbell 75 N. Central Ave. Campbell, CA 95008 RE: Parking and Electrical Service at The Factory Gentlemen: We represent the owners of The Black Kettle restaurant and bar and The Parlor nightclub located in The Factory shopping center in the City of Campbell and it is the purpose of this letter to register with the city our complaint con- cerning interference with parking in The Factory parking lot as a result of the current construction of a parking garage and also with regard to interruption of electrical power at The Factory shopping center as a result of this construction being undertaken on behalf of the City of Campbell. With regard to the parking problem, we have been informed that your contract with E. A. Hathaway & Co., general contractor, for the construction of the parking garage requires that the general contractor leave at least 50% of the back lot available for customers of business es- tablishments in The Factory shopping center and that prior to construction, there were 168 parking spaces in the back lot, thus requiring a total of 84 spaces be made available to customers or clients. Instead, you have permitted the contractor to leave only 40 spaces in that lot and have per- mitted him to occupy as many as 10 to 12 of those spaces with construction vehicles leaving a net amount of parking in that lot of only approximately 28 to 30 spaces as compared to the 84 spaces required by you in your contract with the general contractor. Our clients' businesses are being sharply effected by the inadequate parking available to their custo- mers and we hereby notify you of our demand that you require LAW Of'f'ICES Of' Jesse W Jack City of Campbell October 12, 1978 Page 2 the contractor to comply with his contr~t and leave 84 spaces available and we also notify you of intent to hold you responsible for any damages for your failure to do so. Further, with regard to the construction of the parking garage, it has come to our attention that the contractor has shut off electrical power to our clients' businesses without notice and has thus interrupted their businesses and seriously jeopardized their cold food storage. In the event that any future power outages are to be performed at The Factory shopping center, we hereby demand that these outages occur for periods not to exceed three hours in duration and that they occur soley between the hours of 2:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. and that they occur only after our clients have been given sufficient advance notice of the exact time that the power would be out so that they can take adequate preventative measures to avoid damage to their food or their business operations. In the event that power outages take place at any other time or for periods in excess of that amount of time or without no- tice of the exact times that power will be out, we in- tend to hold the City responsible for the resulting damages which could be as great as $2,000.00 in food and $2,000.00 to $3,000.00 per day in lost revenues at The Black Kettle and $1,000.00 per day at The Parlor. Notice of power outages can be delivered to Mr. James Fuqua or Mr. Donald Baptist at The Black Kettle, Ltd., 93 S. Central Ave., Campbell, CA 95008, 374-9800, or, in the event that no one can be reached at that location, notice can, in the alternative, be delivered to this office during normal working hours. If you have any questions concerning this problem, feel free to contact us. ß:J~ DAVID J~~E DJR/sv cc: Clients .- . -." ~"~'"---,---,,u . . . . ...-. () CITY OF CAMPBEll 75 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 378-8141 Department: PLANNING October 5, 1978 Mr. Donald D. Winchester Brondon Corporation 5255 Mowry Ave. Fremont, CA 95538 RE: MODIFICATION TO PD 77-20 93 S. CENTRAL AVE. Dear Mr. Winchester: Please be advised that the Planning Commission at its regular meeting of October 3, 1978 approved your request for a minor modification to allow dancing in a 7,000 square foot area designated for food and beverage. If there are any questions regarding this matter please contact the Planning Office. Very truly yours, ARTHUR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR ¿M~ RICHARD L. SCHNEIDER PLANNER II AAK!RLS/ j s \...., / (" CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT æ BRaNDON CORPORATION '" ~ Œ~~nw~ ~ S EP 71978 September 7, 1978 Mr. Arthur A. Kee Planning Director City of Campbell 75 North Central Ave. Campbell, CA 95008 RE: "The Factory" property Dear Art; As per your request at today's meeting we have tentatively leased the old Blum's Ice Cream Parlor space, located at the South West corner of the Drying Shed, to a user who is currently leasing space within our Company Store location. As I understand, since the 1500 square foot space is allocated for either Food and Bererage or Retail, there shouldn't be any problem for our new user to oper- ate the space as a combination Retail/Food and Beverage. We would also like to expand the use of our 7000 square foot Food and Beverage space, located on the north side of the Drying Shed, to incumpus the existing 280 square feet as discribed in the construction drawing which we delivered to you at today's meeting. This additional 280 square feet will be utilized as bathroom facilities to service our 7000 square foot space. Thank you for your assistance. Since.\re lY..:~. ..'.. a! /)j " ¡ I uJo 1 .' . aId D. Winchester President Brondon Corporation 5255 Mowry Avenue. Fremont, CA 94538 . (415)791-8585 ( I I I I I I i I (~jJ}, 0 F (~A M I) II ELL 75 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 378-8141 Department: Planning July 31, 1979 Mr. Don Winchester 5255 Mowry Avenue Fremont, CA 94538 RE: Proposed Utilization of Space - The Factory - 93 S. Central Avenue Dear Mr. Winchester: This office has had an opportunity to review your proposed revï"sion to the utilization of leasable space within "The Factory" which was submitted on July 25, 1979. After reviewing the information provided, the following areas of change should be noted: 1. The total leasable area which is. being proposed for a change from "retaiPto "food and beverage" usage is approximately 2,190 square feet. 2. The increase in the area of the "Smokey Mountain Saloon" is shown to be approximately 850 square feet. This increase is in addition to the approxi- mately 860 square feet of food and beverage area held in reserve when Smokey Mountain moved to its present location. 3. The total leasable area which is being proposed for a change from "food and beveragell to II retail II usage is approximately 4,970 square feet. 4. The difference between the sum of areas 1 and 2 (above) and area 3 is approxi- mately 1,930 square feet. This figure rep~esents the total unused food and beverage area for The Factory as allowed by Ordinance 1137 adopted by the City Council on January 9, 1978. With the above information in mind, it is the opinion of the Planning Director that your proposed revision to the areas for IIfood and beveragell usage is acceptable and is within the scope of the conditions of approval which were adopted as part of Ordi nance 1137, If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Department. Sincere ly, ARTHUR A. KEE ~.? PI;~EC:OR PHLk1P'~STÁ D PRINCIPÃL PL ER ld dd/~/J~ July 16, 1979 CITY OF CAMPBELL PL.ANNING DEPARTMENT Mr. Art Keyes Planning Director Planning Department CITY OF CAMPBELL 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, California 95008 Subject: The Factory Plan Development Permit Dear Mr. Keyes: It has come to my attention that The Factory has requested a change in occupancy for the space within this complex previously occupied by Cris Cassara. It appears that they are asking your department to allow them to change the use from retail to entertainment. It is my understanding that the city took a very firm position regarding the amount of entertainment to be located within the southerly most complex of the Factory. I believe that in numerous conversations with you and other city officials it was made extremely clear that those spaces currently designated for retail remain retail and that only the area within the Wrinkled Prune Annex would be subject to future evaluation. I am deeply concerned about this action because the ownership of the Factory clearly intends to change the entire complex to entertainment if you allow them to do so. Further, it is my opinion, that they could care less about the long term parking impact problems that action would create. It is my opinion that if the retail aspect of this center is to remain viable key locations such as, Comfort Stuff, People's Pants, Goldfingers, Cris Cassara, and other previously designated retail locations must remain retail. If any of these locations change to entertainment people will not recognize the center as having any retail viability. 93 South Central Avenue . Campbell, California 95008 . 374-9610 Mr. Keyes July 16,1979 Page Two I wish to go on record with a personal observation, and that is that little effort is being expended by the owners of the Factory to lease this complex to viable retail tenants. It is my opinion that little effort is being made to lease it to any type of tenant. Therefore if they are using the argu- ment that they are unable to locate "quality retail tenants" please bear in mind that it requires a "concentrated effort" in order to locate viable retail tenants. I am herein stating the Black Kettle's firm opposition to any changes within this complex and hope that your office along with other departments of the city will tell Brondon once and for all that their shopping center has been planned and it is now their responsibility to lease it. Sincerely, n d V. General Partner BLACK KETTLE LTD. DVB:ac PLANNING September 29, 1978 Mr. Donald D. WInchester President Brondon Corporation 5255 Mowry Avenue Fremont, CA 9~538 RE: PO 77002000 THE FACTORY 91 S. CENTRAL AVENUE. CAMPBELL Dear Mr. Winchester: Please be advised that the PlannIng Commission of the City of Campbell has set the time of 7=30 p.m. on Tuesday, October 3, 1978 In the City Hall Counell Chambers, 75 North Central Avenue. Campbell a. the time and place to cons i cler your request for a mInor modification to a11ow dancl n9 I n an area desl gnated for food and beverage on property located at 91 S. Central Avenue In a pooD (Planned Development/Commlrclan ZonIng District. A copy of the Staff Connent Sheet and agenda for the meeting are enclosed for your Information. It Is necessary that you, or your authorized representative, be pre.ent at said hearIng. Very truly yours, ARTHUR A. KEE Planning Director Encls. Jw f5) ~ ~.n I.~:n \11 ~ r¡Jì 11\\ - ~-.. n 4 8 ~ 978 lW :.r'l ! CITY OF CAíif¡f30ELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT 81 BRaNDON CORPORATION September 14, 1978 City of Campbell Planning Commission 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 Attn: Arthur A. Kee, Planning Director Re: Factory Property - in particular, the 7,000 square foot space located on the north side of the Drying Shed. Dear Art: We would like to request a minor modification to the approved planned development for The Factory. The pro- posed utilization of the space in question would oper- ate as a restaurant with dancing and entertainment. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, BRO~ ORPO(};; ~ D D. ;n~- President DDW/aw 5255 Mowry Avenue. Fremont. CA 94538 . (415)791-8585 /" . /:- (.~L..I I ~ ~~~R ~ ~ ~~ \D) CITY OF CAMPBELL 75 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE CAMPBELL. CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 378-8141 erN OF CAMPBELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT Department: Building April 4, 1978 Brondon Corporation 5255 Mowry Avenue Fremont, CA 94536 Dear Sirs: The Building Department is in the process of plan checking the parking garage to be located at the rear of the Factory. In the plan check it has c- to our attention that the Factory was issued a pemit for a Group F-2 occupancy which provides for retail stores. This letter is being sent to clarify some of the sections of the Uniform Building Code that may be exceeded in the near future if the parking garage is to be built and assembly uses, such as restaurants and nightclubs, are to continue. The Building Code under Section 502 (b) allows the floor area of the Factory to be unlimited, provided that all four sideyards are a minimum of sixty feet in width, the building ;s not over ~ stories, and ;s fully sprinklered. Under Section 503 of the Uniform Building mixed occupancies, such as asse~lies. are pe~itted provided that it does not exceed 10% of the total floor area. Based on the Uniform Building Code and this letter, I advise you that prior to leasing any future space for assembly purposes that consideration be given to the requirem~ts of the code. Ex~ination of the floor area. and the fact that this is a retail sales shopping center. sh~ that the Building ~par~nt cannot guarantee that in the future ~rmits ~y be given for Group B ass~bly occupancies. The elimination of the rear six~ foot side- yard by the projected parking structure could require ~d1ficatlons W the existing shopping center, primarily as to fire area separation walls. The Building Code does offer many various ways of providing for assembly use of the shopping center with the elimination of the six~ food sid~ard. and the Building Department certainly would grant permits if the buildings were made to comply with the Building Code. Very truly yours, '/1' /3 Wallace H. Byron, Building Official 1w cc.. Fire Dept. "'Planning Dept. WM, H, MAcLAUGHLIN JOHN S, BANCHERO REALTORS ðJ-.J I ¡ill 1..' IH',¡cé PHONE: 371-9021 AREA CODE 916 MAcLAUGHLIN & caMP ANY WEST SACRAMENTO PORT CENTER 27",,-B DEL MONTE STREET WEST SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95691 November 28,1977 ~='- P fñ) r;:¡ n í\ r¡ fi? ~ D'. 1,:J.:..I'.I'::¡,.i\'.),;'¡.-J.. ,n, ) " , P " ," " Ir\ \ ;- "--, , "', : \, - - L I ~ N OV 2 8 1977 - Arthur Kee, Planning Director City of Campbell 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, California 95008 CITY OF CANjf..JBELL I;LA~':N!:--":G D~PARTMENT. Gentlemen: I have been advised that on December 12, 1977 you will hear the appli- cation of Central 93 Associates, owners of the Factory for the approval of the revised commercial uses for the Factory, revised parking design, plans and elevations of the two story parking structure. The Planning Commission came up with the recommendation in correspondence to me dated November 11 that no additional tenants would be permitted to occupy space at the Factory until such time as the parking structure is complete. In my opinion, that is unfair. As you know, there are a number of vacancies at the Factory on retail space that once was occupied. One of the salient reasons why there is a resistance to new tenants to occupy the Factory is the fact that the south loop was constructed prior to the development of adequate parking. The substantial loss of parking spaces due to the construction of the south loop and the rapid speed by which traffic traverses the south loop and the inability to get into the parking lot from the south loop until you approach the very end of our parking lot next to the railroad track are major resistant factors why shoppers will not come to the Factory and why tenants have a resistance to set up businesses. It is obvious that there is sufficient parking in the daytime when the res- taurant and entertainment lounges are not in use. Therefore, I earnestly request that you over rule the Planning Commission's recommendation and permit us to lease space that has already been occupied to new tenants if they wish to come into the Factory. By way of contrast, if the tenants had not vacated that space, you wouldn't ask them to terminate their occupancy because of this application to revise the present PD zoning. On the other hand, we have agreed with the Planning Commissioner and the Building Dept. that we would not construct any new spaces for tenants until the parking lot structure is completed. But please, don't prohibit us to lease vacant Cont. City Clerk November 17,1977 Mr. William H. Maclaughlin Central 93 Associates 93 South Central Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 Dear Mr. Maclaughlin: The Ci~ Council of the City of Campbell has set the hour of 8:00 p.m. on Monday, December 12,1977, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 75 North Central Avenue, Campbell. as the time and place for public hearing to consider your application for: (1) approval of revised usage of an existing commercial development; (2) a revised parking design; and (3) plans, elevations and development schedule to allow construction of a two-story parking structure located on property known as 33 and 93 South Central Avenue, Campbell. It is suggested that you or your representative be present at this hearing. Very truly yours, Phyllis O. Acker, City Clerk POA:JS ¡O-P City Clerk November 7, 1977 Mr. W. H. MacLaughlin Maclaughlin and Company West Sacramento Port Center 2799-8 Del Monte Street West Sacramento, CA 95691 Dear Mr. MacLaughlin: Please be advised that the Campbell Ci,y Council, at its regular meeting on October 24, 1977, approved your request for the Installation of a pizza restaurant at the former locatIon of the Wine Store on Central Avenue, Campbell. Very truly yours, PHYLLI S O. ACKER City Clerk 1? ç - ..;:;¿J WM II M,, AI.'" '!,', 1('"1\. S !iAN( HFR(1 I:FA:nWS r'IIO~F '71-4I1~1 A...(n",~lh MAcLAUC;HLIN & COMPANY WI'" <.,\(RAMI1':I<""RI tl"lll< ~~""-HI1F1M,"'nSI-¡¡11'1 WI,,¡S.\(R\W'-¡O (,\lI¡('~:'I\"-,"": October 19,1971 Art Keyes, Planning Director City of Campbell Campbell, California Re: The Factory Zoning Application Dear Mr. Keyes: As a partner of Central 93 Associates, owner of the Factory, I would like to advise you that the Factory will complete the reorientation of the front parking lot and the constrl ,ion of the second deck over the rear parking lot no later than one year after your department and the City Council ap- proves out plans for this redevelopment. These plans and specifications are presently being drawn now and we anticipate completion and submittal to your office no later than December 20. In turn we hope that your department will approve these plans no later than January 30 so we can be under construction with these parking lot improvements no later than March 1,1978. As summing 120 days schedule, the entire work should be completed by July 1,1978. If you should need any clarification as to these dates or the nature of this construction, please advise. If I don't hear from you I will assume that the application will be submitted for approval at your department's earliest convenience. Thank you. Very truly yours, vz" - (rJ )J1~¥c~A w. H. Mac~~~~ ~ cc: Jim Lyle Willi: tfd ~ ~C~~5~~Œ fD) CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT .. WM. H. MpcLAUGHLIN JOHN S. BANCHERO REALTORS PHONE: 171-9021 AREA CODE 916 MAcLAUGHLIN & COMPANY October 14,1977 RECEIVED 0 c r 1 '7 19/ ¡ WEST SACRAMENTO PORT CENTER 27C)Q-B DEL MONTE STREET WEST SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95691 City Council of Campbell City of Campbell Campbell, California 95008 cm MAN¡!~W'S {,Fr'I;~ ATTN: Bill podgorsek, Major Gentlemen: On behalf of Central 93 Associates, owner of the Factory of which I am a partner I hereby request you approve the application of Mr. Saied Marashi for the installation of a pizza restaurant at the former location of the Wine Store on Central Avenue in the front parking lot of the Factory premises. The wine store has gone out of business and Mr. Marashi has entered into a lease agreement with the Factory to have a pizza restaurant with a beer and wine license. I realize this use may put an overload on the paesent parking conditions in the evening however I draw your atten- tion to the fact that the antique store which is located next door to the proposed restaurant is closed at 5:00 at night and in 13 of the 16 stores in the Hyde Canner Building are presently vacant. Although we have plans for releasing the premises the reception to respective tenants has not been good because of the questionable status of the parking district. How- ever, now that the parking district has been formed by the Becker interest and Central 93's interest in order to construct a second level over the rear parking lot, I am confident that we will have sufficient parking by June, 1978 to satisfy the requirements of future retail stores and/or restaurants. Therefore, in light of these circumstances and the fact that the new restaur- ant is located north of the Orchard City Drive between the two loop streets I would appreciate your approval on this request so that the prospective ten- ant may be issued a permit to operate his pizza bua:5uess as soon as possible. Thank you. Very truly yours, \JJ ,\\. t\\ Q t, "'- Q tV} ~ W. H. MacLAUGHLIN \. V WHM:tfd (!'~ fr' ¡J- {,./ fr" \ . U: ~/-~f:¿) æ BRaNDON CORPORATION March 20,1978 ~~. Arthur A. Kee Planning Director Ci ty of Campbell 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 Re: Maximum Gross Floor Areas Authorized for "The Factory" and "The Wrinkled Prune Annex" Upon Completion of the Parking District Dear Art: As per your instructions, we in our March 6th letter from The Factory The Wrinkled Prune Annex have converted the maximum floor areas as proposed a "net leaseable" to a gross basis as follows: 117,300 ft2 52,700 ft2 170,000 ft2 This would give a parking ratio of 340 square feet of gross floor area per space, assuming that there are approximately 500 parking spaces in the parking district. Sincerely, THE FACTORY, LTD. By, Brondon eor.porat...i°%:J ~qinq ~n~lï' P(/¡ By: ~~ ~onald L. Peck. Executive Vice Prèsident RLP/kj cc: Joseph Elliott, Director of Public Works Bill M. Helms, Engineering Manager Stan Kulakow, Creegan & D'Angelo Jim Lyle, Pacific Design Group ~ ~~ ~ 1~1~! ~ CITY OF CAMPBELL PI,;ANNING DEPARTMENT. 5255 Mowry Avenue. Fremont, CA 94538 . (415)791-8585 \R{ ~~ŒnWŒ ~ MAR 9 1978 CITY OF CAMPBELL "!,;ANN'NII DEPARTMENT. (þ;l / ßtF / ßèL PO 77-20 BRO DON CORPORATION March 6, 1978 Mr. Arthur A. Kee Planning Director City of Campbell 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 Re: Maximum Net Leaseable Floor Areas Authorized for "The Factory" and "The Wrinkled Prune Annex" Upon Completion of the Parking District. Dear Art: We have instructed Creegan & D'Angelo to tentatively divide the parking assessment district as well as the future mainten- ance district on a 70% - 30% basis between The Factory and The Wrinkled Prune Annex. The allocation is predicated upon the City of Campbell approving a maximum net leaseable floor area for The Factory of 91,000 ft2 (1) and a maximum net leaseable floor area for The Wrinkled Prune Annex of 39,000 ft2 (2). This total maximum authorized floor area of 130,000 ft2 would give a parking ratio of 260 square feet per space, assuming that there are approximately 500 parking spaces in the parking dis- trict. After analyzing all factors, we believe that a parking ratio of 260:1 will provide adequate parking for the two properties because of the dual uses. We will undertake to limit the total floor space of food and beverage establishments in both properties to 50,000 square feet o~ 38.5% of the total net leaseable area. Thank you for your continued support. Sincerely, THE FAC ,LTD. By: ~rond n Corpora /Man~" ing "Generf ! -' .I . er By: \ Ronald L. , \Executive (1) This figure will allow the Hyde Cannery Building to be available for single tenant occupancy (17,472 ft2 vs. 11,723 ft2) and it will permit mezzanine levels to be added in several exis- 5255 Mowry Avenue Fremont, CA 94538 (415)791-8585 Mr. Arthur A. Kee March 6, 1978 Page 2 ting spaces. Presently, The Factory has a net leaseable area of 80,449 ft2. (2) The Wrinkled Prune Annex present~y has a gross area of 19,501 ft2 on the 1st floor, 17,325 ft on the 2nd floor, and 13,988 ft2 on the 3rd floor. RLP/kj cc: Joseph Elliott, Director of Public Works Bill M. Helms, Engineering Manager Stan Kulakow, Creegan & D'Angelo Jim Lyle, Pacific Design Group PROOF OF PUBLICATION , 12015,;)('(',1'.' ~TATI<: tHo' CALIFORNIA, t 'ounly of Sanl,a ('lara I am a dUl.'n of th.' lJnitt'd Slah's .tnd a resident of the ('ountv afort'said; t am over tIlt' age of c'i~hle.'n )/ca,'S, and not a party to or intt~rested in the ahov('~t'ntiUl~d mati.'... I am fht' principal dt!rk of tlw printer of the' (',\MPUELL PBESS :::. Dillon ¡\vl'lmt~. CamlJlwll, ('alifornia, a ncws- "apt'" of ~t'nt'ral circulation. ,}rinted and puh- ¡ished "Vl't.~ Wt'dnt~sday in th.~ dty of Campb.'II, lounly of Sante\ Clara: mitt whit'h m'wspaper has Iwen àdjud~t~d a nt'wspaJ}t'" 01' g(~I1t.t'al circula- linn hy the SIII.erinr ('ourl of th., ('ounty of S.mta ('lara, Slab' of ('alifol'nÌål, ('aSt' Numb.,., IHtHH: í hat lI... uotic.' of whkh tht' anru-xed is a fJrinh-d "UI)Y (st't. in tYI"U' tlot smaller than non-part'il), has b.,.'n publish.'d in .",th n'gular and t'nUn' bsu.' of said m'wspal)(~r and not in uny supph', nwnC tht'n'of on th.' lollowing dat,~s, lo wit: J<'":,nuery 19. I¡II in tht' )'C'ar I!t 78 I ('ertify (01" d.'('lart') un,h'IO It'lla Itv of Iwlojury that th(' fo,,"goin~ ¡.., lI'IW and COlTt'«.'L n~lled at CamJ)bell, ('uHrornia, thts .... 19th .)f JeìJuo-;rv 78 - _,m Ä~ ¡;(ht41l ~ Si~naltlr.' ~I/~ f ",- f'rm This spaCl' is folo lh.~ (~ounty 1M ('tt,..k's Filìn~ Stamp . ' ~.@. ~ ~W~ r¡y i; f'! 1 9 1978 lW CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNIN!3 DEPARTMENT ,C .,< ;: " 0 'Ht).1~'/'~" -/ '~~~fÓ~~' .i:".. .l" ëmi'Of:CAMPBELL ÂDoPT-' 'COIIØJ . ING . PLANS, ~LI;VI'\TtONS, 0 '~... '0.' I'\NOD£VELOPMENT:SCH8).:"tt!It?hØ .. /; f'ÌJL£foR:,,'T:HE"~NNeb '~.'tJt,. .',. ..::~.'.i PEVft;OP.MENT,¡"ZONE.oftheC!lYØf~;~,' , o~fJ:~i'~E~H.,eØc¡nP~....:. \"=.'.."..~:, ,'. " .." i:,," cAM'ÞlElL(APJ¡fication . of', . .PAS~,:':~," Mro wll(iamH. Må~La~6n i)r1 ,thiS 9th'- '.'. 1 ¡,.'!f:i behalf of ÚièJ=aqory...pD T1~'byi~~~_~;,y', '0. '", 2OJ \'..' , ' /, ".' .. "'.'~Y,ES:l."~;Af;.~.:",.,;!~",,.:,,,.,::"..: , The,~ty Coudcil,ofthe CitY ChømberIin..~! .".~~, , :.' :~~\rordait¡..!'~~:~i~. ',,0 r~~Çr~ltN.~~"t. ,~BSÊt!'~"> ."'Qij'C:i~~;, J~:.Îllherebv ~ 'Af!,~::" ,.,'.er.,,: .....','..~,..:amended.. '. "Ejchibi.t..":~t~. :"t:::: , ~.-.o '.'. .",..p.~~.,..,)~.,\;'i:". , ,"Plans år'Id ~~:: Exhibit . ',A1'TE$1:, i .. ".'; ':- "e"efi~tled ð~CJptnent .~Q;~ØI; ,..,',;:,:- '5cþeduJe" Exhibit "'C!" èn" " CitýClerl( ,....,"".~ 0','" .titIèd r'~ Qf,said prQØfll'tY," 'NOTE:~l'Þ:r."ß:'~x'~, ',' and Exh,bit ~~D". ,entitlèd "fi3':ø1'1fi!eIJ:l'~Qfflceof"'>';' "<:Qnditic)ns Qf .Ap¡rovaI",as City,CIerJt: "',:.. ""0'/- per appIie8tion of Mr. WiIIi8n, Wit~fI18P < "';""" ", '. H. Maclaughlin on behalf o1fub,:1-19-78 '~' li ,- d ,'!9 ;); ;1; J"'t RESOLUTION NO. 1388 BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A USE PERMIT TO USE AN EXISTING PAVED AREA AS A PARKING LOT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 93 SOUTH CENTRAL AVENUE IN AN INTERIM ZONE. (Application of Richard B. Hi lIen on behalf of The Factory Management Corporation). The Ci ty Counci I by Ordi nance No. 916, adopted on th e 2L¡th day of September, ]973, establ ished an Interim Zone in the downtown area of Campbe] I and a use permit application to use an existing paved area as a parking lot for property located at 93 South Central Avenue has been presented for approval by Richard B. Mil]en on behalf of The Factory Management Corporation. After notification and publ ic hearing as specified by law on said proposed amendments as fi led in the office of the Planning Oi rector on Apri I 2, 1974, and after oral presentation by the Planning Director, pro- ponents, and opponents the hearing was closed. After due consideration of all the evidence presented, the Planning Commission did recommend approval of said use permit subject to the conditions recommended by staff. Planning Commission further recommends that the City .Counci 1 enact the Reso]ution attached hereto as Exhibi t !'A" g,-anting said use permit for that portion of the above mentioned Interim Zone. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nddôy of t1ay, 1974, by the fcllc...¡ing roll ca II va te : AYES: Commissioners: 0 Hebard, Lubeckis, Dickson, Alexander, Samuelson, Cook, Stewart None NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: None APPROVED: Robert A. Stewart Chairman ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee Sec re ta ry RESOLUTION NO. BEING A RESOLlJTIo;~ OF THE CITY rnTJN(',IL or THE CITY OF CMIPBELL APPROVPJG A USE PEJU-lIT Fm~ A PORTION OF TIfE INTERn! ZONE AS J:STABLISIIEn lW ORDH!M.JCE NO. 916 ON THE 24TH DAY OF Sf;PTPIBER, 1973, AND AS EXTENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 930 ADOPTED ON TilE l<1TH DAY OF .JANU/\T~Y, 197if. (Application of Richard B. ~lillen on behalf of The Factory ;\!anagement Corpora tion) . The City Council of the City of Campbell doés hereby orclain as follows: SECTION ONE: That a use pern1it is hereby approved on tT1at portion of the Interim Zone as shown on Exhibit /\ attached hereto as per the application of Richard B. ~Iillcn, on behalf of The Factory f\!anagement Corporation. Said approval granted subj ect to the f01lo\\'in[', concH tions: 1. Landscape plan indicating type of plant material, location of hose bibs or sprinkler system and type of fencing to be submitted for approval of the Planning Director at tiDe of application for building perJ'lit. Faithful performance bond in the amount of 5>1,000 to be posted to insure landscaping, fencing and striping of parking lot area \\,oithin three 0) months of coP1nletion of construction or applicant may file written agref>ment to complete landscaping, fencing and striping of parking area prior to final building department clearance. 2. BUILDING DEPAJfPŒNT. _._-----_.._._.~-_.__._. - 3. Campbell Municipal Corle, Section 21.51.020. lots to be paved. All parking PUBL I C WORKS DEP ARTr'IENT --.-.-------- .---------------.- 4. Applicant to contact Public Works Department for engineering requirements. The applica~t is notified that he shall comply with nIl applicable Cedes or Ordinances of the City of Canphell ""hid) pertain to this development and arc not herein specified. PASSED AND ADOPTED this by thc following roll call vote: ABSENT: day of , 1974, AYES: CouncilTI1cn: NOE~) : Councilmcn: Councilmen: ATTEST: -- -_.~~ ~- ..--.- .- ".._"0". ...._-- City Clerk APPROVED: -.---.-----.--------' ~Iayor ;,,; i.., , i I~ ç /",,(Y' ~ 'r,:~ "'-""J\: ':J.' '.,;.\, ,;;' . 1<.. ~, ' /" Î {¡" ..;~ ~ c~ V 'c, +-'-~', -'-, ' <" /",' .' ,J ';'" ',,' ~ ,-J, ,"',-.. I ,{/::<' 'I" ,~"'; ',:' /J; ,~ , ~. ,\Z' ' ,,"':' / ,>: /'0...' " -';;' ",' "b ","'" ' .,./ '~ /1', "",',.,'f¡;:' .":; ..(..':"', ..,.,r "', "!¡~,' ~ /,~ '¡f"c"", lc.." ','-" ,i, ,,/ '~.I ,:¡' .I" """:o."'¿r"d' ~ ,-:- "'., -"""'~/ :' " fJ. -' .. ç.,'" ~ /"'-'" Ii>¡ , " I:;::, ..;' /' " I' ','<oJ '/ò :-~"() ", 0' , '/!.'"Q/.'~J 0,;",.,- ,'/",:,.,..;,,' /' '.;" ~ ". ¡;y ',j J. ¡'J ,p", / ,~" " ,+, '" 0, \,c> J. 'V " , -',,'J,-, '~\J~' ;,#;' / ',.' ' 1(,) ,",f/:> ,',.. ,,' /" .' ...,1' I:) ,~.. ~:'; . 1..'>.' / ~ (.)y Y", ,'\0 '" ...., "", , , \ -----J --,-,--------- ,/ . ji'.' - " ' ,j.r>-'-'-"'--/.:;~' '... , "'------, ,; . ..: ,I.> -t- /", "","'" ,II \' ., ,,' ,). Ít.." :~"~ 'r 4J/,.~,~," ... ' --1 E. " ",. _n' ~, !t> ~\ ;<¡ If) '"' --\ )- .. ~' "U tn nI , " " f- \r, G 1 'j(~J 'i~~ ~ I'~"~ ," '", "ì ¡- , , - <>"", "'t', '" 1<0 '," -; '" '" ì? ~ . ,'., ,<..,:, 's' ' ., :'-"<=~, ~fY - I" .,'~ :r.,~ - -, -ì':,- , "i"": ..... " -- U I~, en '-""" -f'-~ (.) ~ 'l.'<- - ~; ~ "'I' - , - 1.0, ' '.. - i;, " "'ie:;; ',,^ ,( ..¡- -- ;;' H- - ,~' .. "'c. ... " "" '.... . I>rì,-.., r, . I...' " rt "- :". '" ';"~'ij':C' ,: ", . --_-!~~- I ~~~ ',---:¡,----' ::,~ ';i ~ " I 7 ", " ,,' I, . ,) ¡: ~' I,:: """,; ~I .' L Il~ L~r-L-___,. '\, II H I, Ii ~\ - I ¡- , I I, ..J '- 1/,1"'.' ." "" .", , t"-,' " ; CAMrnHL . ~ . .,.. I. I:",,~I..~ ~'. r-;-:;:-;-; -¡. -"" :I;-;":;~ì;-;::;::'" '.... ,; :"~~;~~' '¡;:~I.:.'~J:i.:::;: , ;~ ':~ l . I~ Y. I:::: ~,' ::~: ~ I~ '¡ ~ t-' I:;:, \; ",' 'õ,L,tV f ." I:,;,... I!,;: I -t- c, I .i.,'-' : '. t, UI~I'O - , I. -. ""J-:<" I" I; AVE i\ , '0 ", tI ~:'1. 0 ' 1/ . I " ~() n fn "r. ,:"" 0"" 7 I I~:¡ ,,': ":," 'J t" / '::/. ~I , , -:¡'",>:;~ t) / \~ ~I . ... >"b ,-/ r; . l' r)':;' "" . , :;; 1 I I~ ';:1: I' I':> I , '.. :.j ~¡ ,. ,- , " ¡ ~ It I I~" {~ {;;, '" lof ,~ ~ ... ~ J. ~ )- -' .. .. '... .'. '" ", rn ,- I- ~ -,,> )- (\ , ,- .0;, I~ It ... c, () <.' '/' -.1- "I ~o -~ It ',- ',- <ò oi'.. ;" "" ," ' ~? .:(:'-... ~ 'Q, I '" ./,,'.. ~- .t::: ... '-" ' ' ,~) "s-, ~ ,z." ~ ..¡;. 0, ~~ '<"'1, I~ <'I - o' c ;i :,' :¡,';-' 0- Il' .. tn -1 In XJ z: t, ~~ c' .' " /, '0' -............ {f ~ ~ 1(;; , " '" Iq¡ -', <;:; , ~ ,':)0 ~ " ~. ,i~ <. "" I I- e>;' . ;t. , , ;", , t$ ð-, ~' " 1'1 , >:~ to. ... /' ,. " hAi b ì;l- , , '~.. ; ¡o I, r .~. ' ", " ~ IrA . , I te!TI JIll STAFF COMMENT SHEET - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 2, 1974 UP 74-10 The Factory Mill en, R i cha rd Public hearing to consider the appl ication of Richard B. Mi lIen, on behalf of The Factory Management Corporation, to use an existing paved area as a parking lot for property located at 93 South Central Avenue in an Interim Zone. (See map attached). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval, subject to the attached conditions. STAFF DISCUSSION: The applicant is proposing to construct a parking lot on property which is owned by the Southern Pacific Railroad. This parking will be in addition to the parking required and provided in accordance with approved plans for The Factory development. The property 1s located between the railroad tracks and Railway Avenue. The Factory development is located to the west, across the rai lroad tracks from the proposed parking lot. Access to the lot would be from Railroad Avenue and Central Avenue. As shown on the plans, the property would provide parking for 43 automobiles. Landscaping represents approximately 11 percent of the lot area. Staff is recommending approval of the plans subject to the attached conditions. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL UP 74-10 The Factory 1. Landscape plan indicating type of plant material, location of hose bibs or sprinkler system and type of fencing to be submitted for approval of the Planning Director at time of application for building permit. 2. Faithful performance bond in the amount of $1,000 to be posted to insure landscaping, fencing and striping of parking lot area within three (3) months of completion of construction or appl icant may file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing and striping of parking area prior to final building department clearance. BUILDING DEPARTMENT 3. Campbell Municipal Code, Sect. 21.51.020. All parking lots to be paved. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 4. Applicant to contact Public Works Department for engineering requirements. The applicant is notified that he shall comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. CITY or CAMPBELL PLA~NING COM~ISSICN CASE SHEET NAME Factory Management Corporation ADDRESS 93 S. Central Avenue Campbe I I, CA A P P LIe A T ION FOR UP 74- I 0 DATE FILED 4-2- 74 AMOUNT OF FEE $50 DATE PAID 4-2- 74 PROPERTY ADDRESS 93 S. Central Avenue (Rai I road right of way) DATE PUBLISHED IN CAMPBELL PRESS Apri I 17, 1974 DATE PROPERTY WAS POSTED --V~/9-/77'l e/ - )-1'..:> - /"1 7 f May 2, 1974 DATE LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT DATE OF FIRST PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED TO: APPROVED ,-,:JC RESOLUTION NO. 2--01- 7"/ DENIED RESOLUTION NO. DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY CITY COUNCIL ~ -';¿cf- 7¿L' FINAL ACTION: APPROVED ~7/1 DENIED " RECEIPT TV OF CAMPBELL CAMPBEll. CALIFORNIA REVENUE ACCOUNT NO. p-r f2f' CHECK' ~ -YV c3' ~Ò II- FUND NUMBER THIS RECEIPT MUST BE MACHINE VALIDATED AND SIGNED BELOW. 0 MONEY ORDER 0 CASH DATE AMOUNT APR -J- 71! 005 *.*.*50.00 APR -J-74 5 oosA **.*50.00 QÝ.~// .. BY . 0/ Y G:.:..ç::"< . ('" <""' CITY OF CAMPBEll 4283 CITIZEN COpy S-2". Southern Pacific Land Company One Market Street. San Francisco, California 94105 . (415) 362-1212 IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO REAL ESTATE 5. A. SUTFIN MANAGER. REAL ESTATE R. E. MESICK ASSISTANT MANAGER. REAL ESTATE March 26, 1974 C. W. JOHNSON ASSISTANT TO MANAGER. REAL ESTATE Campbell-M-6 Mr. Richard Millen c/o MacLaughlin & Millan The Factory 93 So. Central Campbell, California 95008 Dear Mr. Millen: This refers to several discussions with Bill MacLaughlin concerning railroad-owned property in Campbell presently used for public team track. Subject to approval of our operating and traffic depart- ments, I am willing to enter into negotiations with you to lease this property for automobile parking. In addition, our willingness to negotiate a lease with you is subject to your obtaining the City of Campbell's approval of your plans. I will let you know when we have any further developments in this matter. Very truly yours, S. A. Sutfin 4-B ~~¥\I'- ~~ R~~~'I~,~D CITY OF CAM P8ELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6/ '¡~~'::"" ,7, ':'~":':" ' ~"" !O. : 8 ";~""!.?.. ~tr,,~ J, '~~ ',~ - ~ I~ .' : - ~ ~:I ""'ò;" ';, i ~: L ":"'v. ' , I ..119 .A"DDJT¡O~ " .. ~ cRN SOUfH'NbT. ";C."";¡"'~"""""~ ) .J « i/ .:?/ I¿ ,,"P !J';"'~ 's ' - ',,- :; :; , ,-.....-'; "-~"""".Iy ; ..... .:. ~ '¡¡~f'---~ - ,~_".'.'~ If,,! w ..,,' ._- > [~ ,- -:1 .,,', í < ~ ~.': _oJ $'--..."""""" A1^ I ~ . r¡-;.3-;~2~- . ~ 1/»,~.i~"'IC J " ...~ ti"" 1 , ..!L_, 1.-'" .. ... 1 I'~ ~ .. ,.' ,31 ' J ~ " :, /,m., - iJ' ,. .,' /!I . ." " ---" S C~ ,"T"~, "\ , ::'í'. :<:,..!.. c.A¡,vE" y" c -- Tf'.ACT 's: :- -: j . X' -...ï I jr- / "'~ff'J;-----"-'" ~: ...;..-.;. , .. : ..~~ -'- '" - " Z' 1% -.iL~ 2; ~> 1;-- ,- - ~~-,,; . ." ¡ ¡¡ '?1 ¡~ 7- ",' ,,': ~...,' :; ,.,.....'t 11 ~."'" . " "---' -:", p .. ~ "',,-'-,:; 1# z.- ~ 4- 5' Ó ~ Y 3 -.J -~~--,--_._--- -J .. 'I ~... 7. ~ :, ' 0... ~ -= 49 ._; 41; 4ð I ~. - '. - - - ~ ~ 1 ~ : u . . . . ,. 0.: ~ CAMP8EL~ ... '3 'r¡ S. ~ ¡ R S T ~ I ] ø " j¿ " : j;; ~, , " . " 0 '" 44 I / ~ ". l .sþ " . . " ..,~, ~ , "'" \..- 'S ' , .... ~' 'v 1 ¡ ;a...,.-, 1. ~. " Zs Æ! , .' ¡' \ .~. , 1 -R &- ,\~,. ., ¡: "' \ ,;j;: -<- \ '" ' ~ J , ".... .. , \, '. X ~, .. '\. "', , \, "¿< .co I ,1 ¡ ~I I "'0 -'" ..., ;' \, I"~ fi9 " ':' I' ¡<' ¡." :<P' ,,' {- \, ~' "- ~ ,~~ " ~,~" ", ¡ " ~! '", ':,., , Js ' .' '~ .' ~ / ,!JJ ,: ~ . ,z'1 ,/ JI $: s \. - .;;[ ó' (} ." 9 '.v ;;[.> . - ' ~ <.,: "'9 ':t!l i/ ,;:;, '.'.:0" ""... j' ,v -. , C L""'.~">:;;"i" ~.s>..:.~ ~,- \ <..", ...,.To./ ~.~- ,~.!: IJ C'," It¡ , ~.¡ ~.,.. ',- ',-:.,:..-~ :'..' ,,:/.," I ~~ /:> ., , '~""".-'$ì..-/, ,.<-, ',.1~~' ;, .9.> /' 'I" .: -!Y,../ I .:. (f '" j 1 . ~,. ';" .".? " .. t-' 1:'. ",..' """ ~ ' c, '..q""""v- I' .'-,' / ' *' . ..' G ":1-, I~ ! ¿.. . " . ~ " is,, "", ",?.' <1., ,:.:!!/.. <;/ " t,<I 10 ;2 ~ ^-.., .. ,""". , " " , ¡ ';'-;,,-- Ho... ;:: / ~ .;..,. 'Tf;:;-¡- ""~'¡';~ ""-¡ -7¡; !O,~ '&:5/4-,'3/2,'¡ - /" I , ", /' 9 ~~ 'I.' ,,' '." i:t ,~, ,:¡ / -.. '~. §. }, 1 Ii! £ /î:' i ,i 4- ';:.] !f '!of I - - , <". " s; I <¡ " 1 ~! I~ ~ ".. Iii .-..,RK ~ ~T¡';-:':-"'5 ~-- ¡¡..:~" .3 S!JN";YS.::õ "7- ----- J ' ,--,' .- .' 1 .HYDE 3ROS PROOF OF PU B LI CATION (2015.5 C.C.P¡ ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of Santa Clara I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of the CAMPBELL PRESS a newspaper of general circulation printed and published weekly in the City of Campbell, in said County of Santa Clara, State of California, that said Campbell Press is and was at all times hereinafter mentioned, a newspaper of general cir- culation as that term is defined by Section 4460 of the Political code, and that prior to July 1, 1952, it was issued by the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, Decree Number 84048 establishing it with such status as a newspaper of general circulation; that at all times said newspaper has been established, printed and published in the said City of Campbell, in said County and State, at regular intervals for more than one year preceding the first publication of the notice herein mentioned; that said notice was set in type not smaller than nonpareil, and was preceded with words printed in black face type not smaller than nonpareil, has been pub- lished in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to wit: '~ay 15 all in the year 19.71:- I certify or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Campbell, California, this 15th of '~ay ,197tf ~~-----"--,'---'--- ÌS\-~\~ ~iL\l1 Signature This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp ^d'128-cp PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF .. 'ati CC ef 'JÐ6!"i:ag P.O. f!1 267 NOTICE OF HEARING Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Campbell has set the hour of 8 Þ. M. 011 Tuesday. the 28th day' of May. 1974. in the City Half Council Chambers. 75 'North Central Avenue. Campbell. California, as the time and place for public hearillQon the appl ica tion of the Factory Management Corporation for considerðtion Of a use permit for a parking lot. to be used in conjunction with the factory located at .93' South Central Avenue. Campbell, California. Map and legal agreement for subject property on file in the office of the City Clerk. 75 North Central Avenue.Camp- bell. Interested persons may appear and be heard at said hearing. , DOROTHY TREVETHAN. CITY CLERK CITY OF CAMPBELL. CALIFORNIA Pub.: 5-15-74 l28CP CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA PLANNING DEPARTMENT AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING State of California) ) ss County of Santa Clara) I, County being duly sworn deposes and says: That I am and at all times hereafter mentioned was a citizen of the United States; over the age of twenty-one ~l.zl ) true copy of: Notice of publ ic hearing on the appl ication of Richard Mi lien, (21) years; and. that on the / q ~ day of , 197::!-, I duly posted an exact and Factory Management Corporation, for a use permit for a parking lot to be used in conjunction with The Factory located at 93 S. Central Avenue, Campbell ~ 1 7 1 , d. ~Lù~>t Signature - Attested to and sworn to before me this It/,I} day of ((//:' t~1 197 ¿;. L ---It ---' . ,; ';:¡ . /7 ' / [, 1/7 ~. ;'-,-,,- t ~'-::J_-- C<i-t:Y=~k/DeputYCity ~k --.-- City of Campbell, California This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P¡ ST A TE OF CALIFORNIA, County of Santa Clara Adl/l10-CP I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of the PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF CAMPBELL PRESS Nnt1~~ of He~rin~ 93 South Central Av. P.O.#l267 a newspaper of general circulation printed and published weekly in the City of Campbell, in said County of Santa Clara, State of California, that said Campbell Press is and was at all times hereinafter mentioned, a newspaper of general cir- culation as that term is defined by Section 4460 of the Political code, and that prior to July 1, 1952, it was issued by the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, Decree Number 84048 establishing it with such status as a newspaper of general circulation; that at all times said newspaper has been established, printed and published in the said City of Campbell, in said County and State, at regular intervals for more than one year preceding the first publication of the notice herein mentioned; that said notice was set in type not smaller than nonpareil, and was preceded with words printed in black face type not smaller than nonpareil, has been pub- lished in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to wit: Apri11?, 'NOTICE OF HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission (If the City of Campbell has set the hour of 7:30 p.m. on Thursday, May 2, 1974, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 7S North Central Avenue, Campbell, California,- as the time and place for public hearing on the application of ~e Fact(lr'i Management Corporation for ~ Of - II use perm.,! for a ar rot To De usëa In on un . e actory located 3 Sou al ue Cam b II I rnla. Map an l\I9al eeme for subject property on file in the office of the Planning Department, 75 North Central Avenue; Campbell; C,alifarnia. Interested pers°"1s, may appear and be heard at said hearing. . City of Campbell -Planning Commission /s/ Arthur A. Kee Secretary Pub.:p.~rilH,1974' 110'Çp all in the year 19--74 I certify or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Campbell, California, this 17th of April ,19 74 ....--~ --------'. \\~\\ ~Ti~\ \ ,\ \ Signature r,,~,.,"..\. ',:,r.~'~..'.'..... . .,. ~.,c...'~,-. ':.iJ ~i (' I I"'~ , ~ ¡, ',;' i ~ î ~(' tl'-¡\"~: ~\(. , fin t ~ f'r. . ~,<}A f "HUB OF THE FABULOUS SANTA CLAHA VALLEY!" ...r":: "'..1 t 75 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE. CAMPBELL, CALI FORNIAF~ í~¿~DO8) 378-8141 - PR 1] 79ì4 . Form EIR-3 File # )01,;\; K ' . AZU£Oi/':;,'(1 rr-' " ~ B" . I ~-'J; ~ I Y Ci f "/ , Y .. -~ ;', ---~-- I UP 74 -1 0 --- l)eoUh. DECLARATJOlJT11AT.-AN' J3NVIRONì1ENTJ\L . ---ntPACT REPORT IS NOT REQUIP-ED (NEGATIVE DECLARATION) APPL I CA:n Factory Management Corporation ADDRESS 93 S. Central Ave. PROJECT lJAliE Parking Lot ADDRESS 93 S. Central Ave. Campbell, Caiifornia Pursuant to tile applicable sections of the California Environ- mental Qua.lity Act of 1970 and City of Campbell Resolution No. 3485; and After review of plans and information supplied by the applicant pertaining to the captioned project, the undersigned does hereby determine that the captioned proj Get iV"Íll have no siBnificant effect (no substantial adverse impact) on the environment wit11in tl1C tenas and meaning of said Act and Resolution. Executed at Campbell, California, this 1974 9th day of April Arthur A. Kee Dircctoy or Offici"l 13Y: W.J~ T ' ~ / ~v!þ Eichard Schneider Plam13T I (tI~ir¿T----- ,; cc::: :¡::::::j' C!:y or CI.;.:¡':'¡:':::.i" CI.LifOr:¡;:A - ----- -.----------.--------. ~-_._.- ----- ------_. ----- I. r I'l.. Ie:'. ~: T IgilL: _Factoc'f.J:@nag~ent Corpgrati on t 1'1 e ¿ ~ c; i.. Y f' e 0 l' i' r i :-. t ) Dr.ll: : --- ---- ADDRESS: 93 South Central Avenue T[i.EPliO~:E : 374-4650 PíWPL:?,TY lUD;ŒSS 93 South Central Avenue Rai I road right of way (ApiJlicant ¡,;US'!' at"tùch Je!:al d~scription of pro?crt;;-Y-- IHPIWVE!-lf..r;TS: Exist 5.ng pavement Proposed Parking Lot USE' APPLIED fOR: (Appljca:1t ;:UST cite section n:.:.;-:.Der of Can:p~)ell ~':unici~al CoGe ~;hich auth;:;rizes Pliiar.i"g CQ:.~.¡¡ission ~o grant -::':,e particular use applied for; ~A~~9~Ò APfLICA'TIC¡: : I I ¡.: c, the un è (: 1"" S i g Tl C d per son ( s) h <:. v j n r:. ani n t ere s tin the a b 0 '.' e dc..scrìlJccl pY'o;:'(~rty) hcI'eby r.,a}:e applic.:::tio:¡ for a Use Per:-:1it of t;1L natupc set fo!'th above, in aCCOrdä;¡Ce ,:3.t~ the p::-ovisions of the C~,oTT>cll Muclcipal CcJc o~ the City o~ Ca~pbcll, C~lifc~nia, and J/Wc hereby certify thi3t the infot'Di}-::ion riven herein .is true ar,d COrl'E:ct to t:¡¿; be 5 t 0 f I;. y / 0 U ~ }; n c \1 J. ,,¿ g (' è. n d :b e liE: f . ~~r~ I ¡,F E r.--:..... riled. r1.. rI!.ënf':.~,J.~J).j,-.~, Q.1.:.'... [ro....,.g.foU,... .....i P 1 ù II n 1 ~ D c: p û.r t neT. t t ~ on 1 ['-,T' r:; :;~ ¡ S-,;. , ì "- RespEctfülly $uh~itteJ, (~(~ :.-. '-' . ~. - By:_- CITY OE _CAMPBELL PLtLN'N!!\:G ,DEPARTMENT 93 S.Central Avenue, Campbell 'r!.~~: l' ë:;~-) H~h.Li12-D- -_ß ,-.-l141te & - - - ----- 'l""',t' í"';"" ,"phI"" ¡1'" ¡¡"'jl.' """.'-"""1'-""'" y, "-- ------- ?(~7~-/ C /1'7 ;, ;I ------- -.,----- --c:; dt-~~ j-' --- 2 ¿ 1-1 '-"-7 e"V,:) /t ......---.' r .. Ir:rOl:nATrOì~ fOR Pl:RSO;:S lU. K I r¡ G /, P P LIC!, 7 J 0:; t 0 ~ ^ US I: PI:IZ;,; I T Use Permit ~pplication should ~e co~pJetcly filled out and f~]cd in the o:ficc of the l'lanninc Dc¡~¿~r't~;(;nt, 75 ::orth Ce:r.tral !.';c:n.:c, Carapi.Þcll, Cal5,fol'nia, on forms obtained fl'C~ said office. îr.~ Car.:pvcll Plönl~i;'b CoT:!:rìission r:¡e~ts 0;,\ the fIrst and third :'~Oj:C:ëlYS of each ~onth at the City Hall. A public hcaring is required on cae!) application. Thé' PlanninR Co~~i~sion Secretary is requi~ed to Eivc public notice of said hearing not less than ten days prior to the date of the mectin~ at which the hearing is held. In addition to tll€ application form properly completed, ad¿i¡ional in f 01.'. ,,\ ê t ion s Ìi 0 U 1 d b é fur n ish e d by a IJ P 1 i c .:'. n t 5 co vcr i a g the f 011 0 II - ing poim: S: l. Justification: A clear and detailed statement in writing substan t .f.ã-i.: iñg the r-eques t fer a Use Pc:rmi t . 2. Map or di~hram showing the boundaries of the area for whic1~-LJ~c-P-ermit is requested and of the property surrounding the same for a distance of five hundred feet. 3. Other d~t<:'., such as letterss petitions, drawings or photoGr~p6s which the applicant wishes t6 relate to his application. 4. A fee of $50.00. Make check payable to the City of Campbell. Attention of applicants is especially callcd to the importance of being present at public hearings. The burden of presenting the matter to the Planning Commission and to the City Council is on the applicant, and faiiure to be present at a hearing may adversely affect the applicant's chances of obtaining the Use Permit he requests. R. .. .. E..I...~c..~..,f . ~ l \ ,,-. r, . ,. .' ~ 1 .. ;".¡ t, ,) , ~'M""¡;" \ ,. ¡: [: " t to"""; CITY OF C,A,IVíPBELL I>L!-,N~~JNG DEPARTMENT ~ . . 10. 11. 12. I :;:... :::;>} C};ITr:::/-. rCR I)::rl'¡~ï:>:I:;!:;G pr:(;,~::c:-S ',:;:JC1; r::',..:' i¡!:'n~ II SIG::I;']Cl.::: ;.::;\'I¡:;G:::-:I::;'J¡~L r:':ì'/.CT A n -:. ',: (, ~' t:~ e :: C' 11 0 \.: i Ii ~ 'l u cst ion s by p 1 <l C ì n ¡:; ct c h' c c kin the a p í' ::' (.. ;. r :. 0. t C' ;., l' è C e . 1. Coul¿ t~e project si;nificantly chë:ìnge present usc~ C'~ the project area? 2. Co u 1 d the!, r oj c c: t s i [, n i f i c é). ,¡ t J. Y c h a 11 f; cpr c s en t uses of 1ùnd outsi¿c the project are.:::.? 3. Could the project affect the use of a recre- ational area or area of important aesthetic value? 11 . Could the project substantiallv affect the functioning of an established cot1munity? s. Could the project result in the displacement of community residents? 6. II P e ù 11 y 0 f the n a t U l' a lor 1:1 a n .- mad e f e (). t \1 r' e sin t)H~ p1"oj cct area unique, -that 5.~, not found in other parts of the county? 7. Could the pro~ect significantly affect a known bistorical or archaelof,ical ~ite or its setting? 8. Could the project sißnficantly affect the po- trintial usc~ extraction, or conservation of a natural resource? 9. Does the p~oject area serve as a habitat) food sour'ce, ncstinr, placc, source oÎ \-¡ater, etc.. for' rHrc or endangered ~ild15fc or fish species? Co U ). d the p~' C' j C c t s i f, :15. f }. C ëm t J Y a f fee t f i ;31, ~ \.'ildlifc, 01' plant .life? l.l'C thC'l'C any 1'11}'C 01' cnèanr;Cl'cd plùnt ~~pccics in the project é1r~il? C 0 \\ ) d t h (~ p}' 0 j e c t otl'Lsiùc p~~~f' ir' ~.fí ~ ...., (', .'~ I P - C"-" L .j !: ,< r (> ;. u 1 tin t 11 (' c)' 0 ~; j 0;-: (.' f r ~! ','" .." CITY O¡-.:.- CPdv1 ::'8Ei..~~) ,- PL!'-,NN!NG DEPARTMENT 1'l1,L ::0, ...,,--..-.-- ...- ..'-..--.,...-- Yes y -- ----. -------" ---- I' ,.0 -- ý v -- ý --- ~ --- ¡/ ---.,- ¡/ t/ -- / ---- / ------ / -_.._----- / --------..,' , , ~ ... 13. J II . 15. IG. 17. 18. 19. ',: i 1 J. t}; err 0 j (- c t reG t: : Y' c ¿¡ va l' 5. é! nee fro ,'1 est a b- 1 i ~; : i c' :: Co :; '; 5- T' ç r; ':. r; :: t éll s:: êl ¡¡ d ù r è ~ (¿¡ 5. r) \I ¿¡ teL' , noise, ctc), an~/or a¿orted plan3? ',::11 t!~-: i~:-:-,j(ct r(:(;.'.::~-'e certification, aut~10r- i Z 3 t j ~; ¡; 0 l' i s ~; \) a. :1 ceo!' ù r e r rr. i t by any 1 0 C a 1 , s tat e, 0 r f e.j c: r' ¿: 1 c r: '; ~ :' C 11:'1 C n tal co 11 t r 0 1 a f, C n c y? If so, ?}Cé.~;C ir:c'..icate nÐ7':îC 0:: the ar;ency ------ -_.--- ------- ~ill the project involve the application, use or disposal of hazardous materials? \1 i 11 t 11 c: pro j e c tin vol v e con s t rue t j 0 n 0 f fa¿ilitics in a flood plain? Will the project involve construction of facilities in the area of a known active fault? Could the completed project result in the gen era t i on of sign if lean t al!10unt s of noi se? Could the construction of the project r~sult in the generation of si&nificant amounts of dust? ?O. Could t:-:c cO1;ìpleteè. project re~>ult in t1JC g~ncration of significant amounts of dust? 21. Could the project result in a sign3ficant change in the quality of any portion of the reEion's air or water rc~ources? (Should note surface, gl'Ollnd "later, offshor'c.) ftO ~ r~ ~ .' j\ lJ U ,ie,) i-: d C1TY 0:;;;- Ci1Jv¡¡:::;':3l::LL r'L:,NN~~~G DEPAHTMENT -11. Yes -- ::v ----- ¡/ -.-- / ---- ,/ --- / -- / -- ,/ ---- / ---'- / .-..-.-- ~';t"lt(' (",1: OJ h I:, :,.: ,;'c'.nt L¡;vil'O;:;:".:r.t¿:.l. ., é', . -. -. ---..... . "'--..-.-....... ... ,_...-..- ._... , .o-- '-- -""""""""-"...'...-"- If yO\, Lave ùLS;,;-::X\F;:C; ye~; tc ODe: or' Clerc:; 0;, -t;.C (!\.:e:;¡-;()¡l~; in s,,~:'t.iu¡) II) Ll.l1. sî.:ìll -cLiT,Ll:hQ¡: tl¡c project \;i11 havl: no s i [; D i f .l, C ,1 !J t (~ 11 \' j. 0 n rìl e n t i)]. " :: f c: c t s. j n die ate you Y' rea ~ e'I) ::: below, >, (fir e ~~~-'(;f-})'l~'õ-rë-(:t-----------'- .AM.A. ù- ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~f- ~. --------"'--"'-'-'-----'- ... -.---------......- D d t C é; t' b m i t T. e d FACf()(t'/ MAtJA.6EMt:mT ~r~ .. . - ~ t~-A1tu.~~J--------- A---ppIT.c ic' L t S 11 a TO C -~/£ ~-_._-------- !\ P p], i c éJ. n t s s:i g II ¿, t u r e F,,-"~.' I' ;J \:,J '1":\;, " " 'J u ¿LL C rrv 0 ~-' r>,-."-'.',!N'~.:3 O~P,!\RTMENT PUBLIC HEARINGS AND . ------ UP 71-10 - The Factory - 93 So. Central Avenue ",Y61 ~ It ~ ~I V II~ 'J TIes. No. 3711 I~TRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES - - Now is the time and place regularly set for public bear- ing on the ~pplication of The Factory for a Use Permit for parking, .to use an existing paved area as a parking lot for property located at 93 So. Central Avenue. The Planning Director reported that .the Planning ComnÜssion has recommended approval by a 7-0 vote, subject to four cOnditions contained in the resolution granting approval. Councilman Hammer inquired if this property has been planned as part of the downtown parking district. Mr. Kee stated that it had not. There being no objeetions, oral or written, Councilman Doetsch proposes and moves that the hearing be closed, seconded by Councilman Hammer and unanimously adopted. Councilman Doetsch proposes and moves that a resolu- tion be adopted approving the Use Permit, seconded by Councilman Podgorsek and carried by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Chamberlin, Doetsch, Hammer, Podgorsek, Paul None None NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen: Councilmen: UP 74- 10 The Factory Mi lIen, Richard B. S \'}\1~ This is the time and place for public hearing to :onsider the application of Rir' ,rd B. 11illen, on behalf of The Factory Managemci Corporation, to use an existing paved area as a parking Jot for property located at 93 South Central Avenue in an Interim Zone. ChairiHdll Stewart asked 1.11". Kee for his comments. Mr. Kee advised that the staff has r~commended approval subject to the four conditions attached to the staff comment sheet. The appl icant is proposing to construct a parking lot on property which is owned by the Southern Pacific Railroad. The parking will be in addition to the parking requi red and provided in accordance with approved plans for The Factory development. The property would provide for 43 automobi les. Landscaping represents approximately eleven percent of the area. Chairman Stewart asked if there would be any problems in backing. Mr. Kee presented an aerial photo of the property and explained the parking layout - there should be no problem in backing. Chairman Stewart declared the public hearing open and asked if anyone wished to be heard. Commissioner Hebard moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by Commissioner Dickson and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 1388 AYES: Commi ss ioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: Circulation Element Commissioner Samuelson moved that Resolution No. 1388 be adopted recommending that the City Counci I approve UP 74-10 (Richard B. Mi lIen on behalf of The Factory Management Corporation), subject to conditions out] ¡ned by staff, seconded by Commissioner Lubeckis and adopted by the following roll call vote: . Hebard, Lubeckis, Dickson, Alexander, Samuelson, Cook, Stewart None None This is the time and place fo~'continued publ ic hearing on proposed amendments to the Circulation Element of the General Plan.' Chairman Stewart asked Mr. Kee for his comments. Mr. Kee stated that the staff has recommended continuance to the first meeting in June due to the current work load in the Planning Office, additional time is needed to prepare the reports for this item. Commissioner Dickson moved that the Circulation Element of the General Plan be continued to the June 6, 1974 meeting of the Planning Commission, seconded by Commissioner Samuelson and unanimously adopted. '1 PD 77-20 Central 93 Associates Q{l 11tlj ./ I /-;1 r;2(1 ~ 'i? This is the time and place for continued public hearing to consider the application of Mr. William H. MacLaughlin and the Central 93 Associates for: (I) approval of revised usage of an existing commercial development, (2) a revised parking design, and (3) plans, elevations - and development schedule to allow construction of a two-story parking structure located on property known as 33 and 93 S. Central Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development/Commercial) Zoning District. Chairman Dickson explained that this item had been continued from the November 15, 1977 Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Campos reported that the applicant had met with the Site and Architectural Review Committee this morning. Staff displayed the plans in order that the Commission would have an opportunity to look the plans over more closely. Commissioner Campos stated that the Architectural Review Committee was satisfied with the plans, elevations, and design. However, there were two items which the Committee felt should be brought to the Commission's attention. The first item concerned a "right turn only" sign to be installed; the second concern was regarding whether larger type vehicles would be able to make turning movements in the parking structure. It is the Committee's recommendation that if this project is approved, these items can be resolved once the project is completed. Staff has advised the Committee that if a "right turn only" sign is warranted it would be installed at the time of completion. Commissioner Pack inquired if egress from only the west side of the lot had been discussed. Commissioner Campos responded that it had not been discussed. Mr. Helms stated that he did not believe it would be possible since the railroad tracks are to the immediate east. Commissioner Lubeckis inquired if the parking structure was attached in any way to any of the existing buildings. Mr. Kee responded that it would not be; however, there would be a trellis which would be in the walkway. Commissioner Campos reported that the Committee is recommending approval subject to the conditions recommended by staff with the exception of Condition No.2 which the Committee felt should be referred to the Commission. At this time Mr. Kee explained the background of this project, and stated that staff is recommending approval of the overall project. He made it clear to the Commission that staff's concern is that in the event the parking structure is not constructed, a serious problem might be created in terms of the gross area of the building in relation to the parking available. Commissioner Hebard inquired as to how many parking spaces the new structure would have. Mr. Kee responded that there would be 154 spaces on the first level and 161 spaces on the upper level; there are presently 306 spaces, the total number of future spaces would be 466. Commissioner Hebard inquired if a study had been made on the noise impact of the parking structure. Mr. Kee stated that a Negative Declaration had been filed, but a noise study had not been made. Chairman Dickson declared the public hearing open and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this time. Mr. Jim Lyle of Pacific Design Group, architect for the applicant, appeared before the Commission to explain the position of The Factory and Central 93. -16- He stated that the staff's alternative B, as stated in the Staff Comment Sheet, was agreeable to the applicant with a modification in the wording that rather than Ilin an area approved by the Planning Commission" the applicant stated that he wished the alternative to read: "If the Parking District fails, the applicant will build the parking structure at that location within one year." The applicant has no objection to the signing of an agreement; however, if it were to be recorded with the Recorder this would place a cloud on the financial aspects and therefore he wished to be relieved of that condition. Mr. Lyle wished to clarify that the use as an existing restaurant could be used, but no additional restaurants are accepted. Mr. Kee stated that the desires expressed by Mr. Lyle seemed reasonable to staff, and suggested that a time limit be placed. Much discussion ensued regarding the conditions, noise study, and restaurant uses. Mr. Bill MacLaughlin, applicant, appeared before the Commission. He stated that he is willing to construct the parking structure if the Parking District fails and assured the Commission that they did not plan to lease additional space until completion of the parking structure. Mr. Kee stated to the Commission at this time that the Architectural Advisor had also recommended approval of these plans at the Architectural Review Committee meeting of this morning. No one else wishing to be heard, Commissioner Hebard moved that the public hearing be closed. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Pack and unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 1657 Commissioner Samuelson moved that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution recommending approval of the appli- cation of Mr. William H. MacLaughlin and the Central 93 Associates for: (1) approval of revised usage of an existing commercial development, (2) a revised parking design, and (3) plans, elevations, and development schedule to allow construction of a two-story parking structure located on property known as 33 and 93 S. Central Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development/Commercial) Zoning District with Condition No.2 to read as follows: "Provide an agreement satisfactory to the City Attorney that in the event the proposed parking district for this area fails, the parking structure shall be constructed at the owners expense within one year of ordinance approval by the City Council. I' ORIGINAL RESOLUTION -17- AMENDED RESOLUTION Commissioner Hebard moved to amend the original motion to include a condition requiring a noise study as to what changes must be made to control the noise affecting the neighborhood to the west and the south, seconded by Commissioner Samuelson, and failed by the following roll call vote, with Commissioner Pack abstaining because of a possible conflict of interest. VOTE ON AMENDED MOTION AYES: Commissioners: Hebard, Samuelson, Dickson NOES: Commissioners: Campos, Lubeckis ABSENT: Commissioners: Vierhus ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Pack VOTE ON ORIGINAL MOTION AYES: Commissioners: Hebard, NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Convnissioners: Vierhus Campos, Pack, Samuelson, Lubeckis, Dickson LL r /-'~J-78 PD 77-20 - MacLaughlin This is second reading and final adoption of Ordinance No. 1137, Ord. No. 1137 PD 77-20 - Wm. H. MacLaugh1in, 33 and 93 So. Central Avenue. RESOLUTION NO. 1657 PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA Being a Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Campbell recommending approval of plans, elevations and development schedule to allow the construction of a parking structure and a revision to occupancy uses for the Factory located at 93 South Central Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development/Commercial) Zoning District (application of Mr. William H. MacLaughlin on behalf of the Factory, PD 77-20). After notification and public hearing as specified by law on said proposed amendments, as filed in the office of the Planning Department on October 25, 1977 and after presentation by the Planning Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed. After due consideration of all the evidence presented, the Planning Commission did find as follows: 1. That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such use, or detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. 2. That the proposed development is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Campbell. Based on the above findings, the Planning Commission did recommend approval of the requested plans, elevations and development schedule as presented and further recommends that the City Council enact the Ordinance attached hereto as Exhibit "A" adopting said p1an.s, elevations and develop- ment schedule for that portion of the above mentioned Planned Development Zone. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 20th day of December 1977, by the following ro 11 ca 11 vote: AYES: Commissioners: Hebard, Campos, Pack, Samuelson, Lubeckis Dickson NOES: COITVll i ss i oners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Vierhus APPROVED: J. DuWayne Dickson Chairman ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee Secretary ORDINANCE NO. BEING AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL ADOPTING PLANS, ELEVATIONS, AND DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONE ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL. (Application of Mr. William H. MacLaughl in on behalf of the Factory, PD 77-20.) The City Council of the City of Campbell does ordain as follows: SECTION ONE: That the Zoning Map of the City of Campbell is hereby changed and amended by adopting the attached "Exhibit A" entitled "Plans and Elevations," Exhibit "B" entitled "Development Schedule," Exhibit "C" entitled "Map of said property," and Exhibit "D" entitled "Conditions of Approva 1" as per app 1 i cat i on of Mr. Wi 11 i am H. MacLaugh 1 in on beha 1f of the Factory. SAID APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE ATTACHED CONDITIONS ("EXHIBIT D"). The applicant is notified that he shall comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. PASSED AND ADOPTED this the following roll call vote: day of , 197_, by AYES: Councilmen: NOES: Councilmen: ABSENT: Counc i 1 men: APPROVED: Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk , EXH I BIT "011 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - PD 77-20 1. Site and Architectural approval for the proposed parking structure. (detai led plans) 2. Provide an agreement satisfactory to the City Attorney that in the event the proposed parking district for this area fails, the parking structure shall be constructed at the owner's expense within one year of ordinance approval by the City Council. 3. No additional food and/or beverage establishments shall be permitted; however, existing food and/or beverage establishments may be replaced with like uses or with retail sales uses in the event of vacancies. 4. Relocate trash enclosure as approved by Fire Marshal. 5. Lower level of parking garage shall have an automatic fire extinguishing system. 6. Provide one street fire hydrant on the west side of South Central Avenue 70~ feet north of Orchard City Drive. 7. 8. Provide portable fire extinguishers for parking structure. Restriping of front parking area to be approved by Department of Publ ic Works. ,Þ J ORDINANCE NO. 1137 bEING AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL ADOPTING PLANS, ELEVATIONS, AND DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONE ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL. (Appl ication of Mr. Wi 11 iam H. MacLaughl in on behalf of the Factory, PO 77-20.) The City Council of the City of Campbell Joes ordain as follows: SECTION ONE: That the Zoning Map of the City of Campbell is hereby chal1(jLlJ and amended by adopting the attached 'IExhibit All entitled IIPlans and Ell'vations,11 Exhibit IIBII entitled IIDeveloprnent Schedule,!1 Exhibit "C" entitled "Map of said property,1I and Exhibit "0" entitled "Conditions of Approvul" as per application of Mr. Will iam H. MacLaughlin on behalf of the Fdclory. SAID APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE ATTACHED CONDITIONS ('IEXHIBIT Dn). The appl icant is notified that he shall comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell which pertain to this developIT~nt and are not herein specified. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9th the following roll call vote: day of January , I 97 ~, by AYES: Counci Imen: NOES: Counc i I men: ABSENT: Counc i I men: Chamberlin, Doetsch, Hammer, Paul, Podgorsek None None APPROVED: William R. Podgorsek Mayor ATTEST: Phyllis O. AckerCity Clerk CITY COUNCIL MTG. APRIL 28, 1980 DEFERRED ITEMS "Rascals" - Live Entertain- ment Permit \' Police Chief Burr - Report dated March 19, 1980. The Chief recommended approval of the live entertainment permit subject to the conditions outlined in his report and the conditions outlined in the report dated March 12, 1980 from Sa1 Leonardi, Battalion Chief. MIS: Paul, Podgorsek - that the live entertainment permit for "Rascals" be approved. Motion adopted unanimously. --- -_'_-~~"_-~_.~-"-"-'-_._-~-'--"~'",-,",-,-" """'"...,, ( E RINCON AVEÑUE ( r!. 'I;" ~ AVENUE-' - I, I." ,- -.. 0 ~"--~I::\ ~ 16, I I ----~---- '.., 1$ 1 w: = '= I -¡ J /' - 0 '..... i . , ~E~ AVENUE f 0 ~D 11: 1 2, ,/;) or .~ / ~ ~ ',.~ ~~ / ""'" It ') ,~,,~ ... -. ~ .. i .. """'::.. ..~;l~ ~~ ~'M,A' en ....'" '1 ~~~ -f.. "'~It.." ~~ . : °..., ~ "', CD' -f, ~ :v..:""']' "'-"""... .. i .: 1.r..- .. ... ,.:.ICf-1 § ...--"" "'1' I, AVE. 1 -- iir..- -1' .to t4'~.... - I - -- 011 N - ii..-.,- -- ; . II. " I., -"--...."" ~ i - :_-- ! I~ ! IE ~ ~!:S " li:l.~ . . ... ft, ;: : ~ t' --. ~ i ~ rí' -{-I-I- t 1.1 CITY COUNCIL MTG. t1ARCH 24, 1980 PD 79-12 - 33 & 93 So. Central - The Factory Ord. 1274 /'7 This is second reading and final adoption of Ordinance No. 1274 - PO 79-12 - The Factory. ',~ ',' RESOLUTION NO. 1871 BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A REVISED SPACE UTILIZATION PLAN FOR PROPERTY KNOWN AS 33 & 93 S. CENTRAL AVENUE LOCATED IN A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT (APPLICATION OF THE FACTORY, PO 79-13). A revised space utilization plan for The Factory, located on property known as 33 & 93 S. Central Avenue, in a P~D (Planned Development/ Commercial) Zoning District have been presented for approval by Mr. Don Winchester and Mr. Ron Peck. After notification and public hearing as specified by law on said proposed amendments, as filed in the Office of the Planning Department on November 13,1980, and after presentation by the Planning Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed. After due consideration of all evidence presented, the Planning Commission did find as follows: That the establishment, maintenance, and operation of the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort or general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such use, or detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City. Based on the above findings, the Planning Commission did recommend approval of the revised space utilization plan as presented and further recommends that the City Council enact the Ordinance attached hereto as IIExhibit All, adopting said space utilization plan for that portion of the above mentioned Planned Development Zone. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 5th day of February, 1980 by the following roll ca 11 vote: AYES: Commissioners: Pack, Meyer, Kotowski, Campos NOES: Commissioners: Kasolas ABSENT: Commissioners: Dickson ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Fairbanks APPROVED: Daniel Campos, Chairman ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee, Secretary . . , , ", ~ <~ I ~v ~ \ V \ RESC:'U7IC; :;:). 1349 BEING A RESOLUT:O~¡ OF 7::E PLAl¡~ìInG CO!H:rssIoH OF TEE cr':'y or C;.,:~?;:::::.. ?:::::c~':~':::::;rI;~G AP??-OVf..L OF A USE PE?~IT 70 MC~:?Y TE~ G~OSS SQUARE FOOTAGE or CG;'~;.~ERCI.A.L ~..s::: AS O?IG!;iALLY APP?OVED FO?- Ti;!:: r;,c--;c,?,'f C():::~~?::::;'-.L CC:P:"'f.X LCC.'~T~D f.,T 93 SOUTH C~:;::',':'L .~.~;=:::.;::: ::: :-.;: !:;~':::?II': Z(,;;:::. (Application of Richar¿ !~illen). The City Council by Crdinance !:o. 916, adopted on the 24th day of September, 1973, establis~ed an Interim Zone in the down- town area of Campbell and a Use ?er~it application for a ~odi- fication to the gross square foc~age of commercial use has been presented for approval on property known as 93 South Central Avenue by Richard Millen. After notification and public hearing as specified by law on said proposed amendment, as filed in the office of the Planning Director on November 1, 1973, arid after oral presentation by the Planning Director, proponents and opponents the hearing was closed. After due consideration of all evidence presented, thE Planning Commission did recommend approval of said Use permit, as presented by the applicant ana further rec~~menès that the City Council enact the Resolution attacbeà hereto as Lxhibit !JAil granting said use permit, for that portion of the above mentioned Interim Zone. PASED AND ADOPTED this 19th day of November~ 1973, by the following roll call vote: l\YES: Commissioners: Alexander, Lubeckis, Dickson, Stewart, Sa~uelson, Cook, Hebard None NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: None APPROVED: Don Hebard Chairman ATTEST: Arthùr A. Kee Secretary :#3>_-... . STAFF CO~~ENT SHEET - ¿LANNING CO~~ISSION MEETINL JF NOVEMBER 19, 1973. UP 73-13 Millen, Richard Application of Richard Millen for a use permit to modify the gross square footage of commercial use as originally approved for The Factory commercial complex located at 93 South Central Ave. in an Interim Zoning District. (See attached map.) STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval, subject to the attached conditions. STAFF DISCUSSION: The applicant is proposing an additional 5,421 square feet of commercial floor area and it is intended that an additional 4,600 square feet of the original area be designated for theater use and considered as a dual purpose use. The 5,421 square foot free standing building is lo- cated north of the main complex and was indicated on the original plan as existing structure to remain. No use was designated, which meant according to the ordinance that a storage use would continue. The parking areas have been revised for an increase.of 8 spaces and the landscape areas appear to be approximately the same, or perhaps provide for a slight increase. The current landscape areas as well as the parking area between Central and First Street would be modified in accordance with the previous plans submitted when the Loop Street is constructed. There is a condition which requires that all parking spaces eliminated when the Southerly Loop Street is constructed shall be provided at a new location or the applicant shall join or become a part of a parking district which will provide additional parking within this area. The staff would like to emphasize that any changes in elevations as approved by the City must have approval of the City if modifications are made. It should also be noted that the conditions of the original approval, Ordinance 869 and "S" 73-5, shall continue. ~3 0 .... 1 .....~<' CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL UP 73-13 Millen, Richard FIRE DEPARTMENT 1. Trash enclosures should be of the number and size to accommodate all trash production. 2. Provide "2ABC" fire extinguishers as per Fire Department requirements. BUILDING DEPARTMENT 1. Applicant to meet all Building Department requirements. ; tlJ Pu~)lic Hearing: . 'u1? 'ï~-J.3 - 93 So. Central - The Factory - Millen ¿~)C1 > ß I?-/IO ':0. , Now is the time and place regularly set ~Qr ~1~ put hearing on the applicatio of Richard Millen for a use permit to modify the gross square footage of commercial use as originally approved for The Factory commercial complex located at 93 South Central Avenue, The Planning Director reported that the applicant is proposing an additional 5,421 sq. ft. of commercial floor area and ~t is intended {hat an additional 4,600 sq. ft. of the original area be designated for theatre use and considered as a dual purpose use. The 5,421 sq. ft. free standing building is located north of the main complex and was indicated on the original plan as "existing structure to remain." No use was designated, which Iœant according to the ordinance that a storage use would continue. It should be noted that the conditions of the original approval, Ordinance No. 869 and"S'-'73-5 shall con- tinue. Approval was recommended by the Commission by a 7-0 vote. Mr. Kee reported that all parking spaces will be eliminated when the southerly Loop Street is con- structed and they shall be provided at a new loca- tion or the applicant shall join or become a part of a-parking district which will provide additional parking within the area. There being no objections, oral or written, Council- man Doetsch proposes and moves that the hearing be closed, seconded by Councilman Hammer and unanimously adopted. Councilman Podgorsek stated that he did not think the Loop Street should be referred to as a reality, as though it were there. Mr. Kee reported that he was referring to the Plan Line Ordinance adopted by the Council establishing the Plan Lines for both Loop Streets. Councilman Hammer proposes and moves that a resolu- tion be adopted approving Use Permit No. 73-13, -5- [~H-: 't7U-'V"\>"t-' . ' . -" . '.' . . . o. ~ . '~:, ",,""~ ~ . ~ .'t, ~.'>:;-,~:'\.._,,~'} :,;}" ':1,' -, :J,' :), " ~,',' ".~ . "".,Ð,"' r,S>_, =).: '=), 2- ,~), .,,' _1:,',.), ,'):',t, ,~~3 ( 0 (' ,r 1"'- . ~ 1";- ii.< .' ,~ ,~ -'11,"" '"' ..,. ... ~-) )- ).. ) ),) I.. ¡, ,... ..' ., '." 'J (J ~,¡ -- -J -, .JT J ~ ;.J', ,- '" ,,' '" - " ' C . ;:' ~ .. ~~ r: f-~ ;j: 3> J :J -:J ¿;) .:>. 309 => ~) =) J. ). .). . --,----- -,- - - - -,-~ - - - - - - - - - -'. . . ~ "')' Res. No. 3623 ... seconded by Councilman Doetsch and carried by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Doetsch, Hammer, Paul, Poàgorsek, Chamberlin None None NOES: ABSENT: Councilmen: Councilmen: 'Tl3 ~ , u ... 0 () ORDINANCE NO. 869 BEING AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL BY CHANGING ZONE FROM M-2-S to P-D ON PROPERTY KNOWN AS 91 SOUTH CENTRAL AVENUE. (R. B. Millen) The City Council of the City of Campbell does ordain as follo,"s: SECTION ONE: That the Zoning Map of the City of Campbell, together with amendments thereto, is hereby changed and amended. Said amendments being outlined on the map attached hereto en- titled "Exhibit A". SECTION TWO: That the above mentioned amendment is approved subject tothe follo\odng conditions: 1. All parking spaces eliminated when the southerly loop street is constructed shall be provided at a new location or the applicant shall join and become a part of a parking district within this area. 2. A parking ratio of one space for each 182 square feet of gross leaseable area shall be provided, excluding the floor area of the cinema. 3. Architectural and site approval by the Planning Commission. 4. on-site parking and circulation must be compatible with pro- posed south loop street construction and prospective attendant parking district. 5. The developer must comply with all applicable sections of the Campbell Municipal Code relative to the construction of off- site and on-site improvements. Dedication to 60 foot right-of-way and improvement of First Street and Central Avenue frontages. 6. Execute petition for formation of downtown parking district. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 27th day of November, 1972, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmen: Chamberlin~ Doetsch, Hammer~ Paul, Podgorsek None NOES: Councilmen: ABSENT: Councilmen: None APPROVED ,7 -<i:../ ~- Mayor Clerk if/ '2:. c.. ì a -I ~ lí~~ ," Ii ":~ ::...:? , i ','. ,v,:l.' I {,- '. -I~,~:h~r I ' - . "',.; I ~'~ ':';,'-'1 __1 {~:, .'.' .~::. J 1/' --, . "/" , ¡ ;-;; 1{.4", ' , - -, / // I '.' ~f: ,. ;' ¡"; ',":",,--,j,; ,. i EXHIBIT I ¡ ~:." ~J /i /' / / - :t' "'. ' / i ___I / , '" J,-:;:- -, ~ /' I ') ,~ ,,;-:, !1 / ~.., ., \0, j ': (~', " ¡'I I I I ,. I ~ ~ I G I -~ --- --/ E ., ",' r ~ ." ;0 \It ('\ -- - ~. , , ~' Q, L_-- ~-.':=~~:: ;BJ¡ ---J . I ----1 "-- .. ... ; I: l..; C,,-/,,\ P"£LL ' ï "t- AVE ~.-. ,.. P, ~ ~, _I~ "'- ,,' "~; " -' ~I-""-;"- ~.....=~- ~ -,,' r',: ..:," ',' ">. to: 'J'" / '--;--, -, --' L~;;"~ ~::":,,,,: <'"\ :: 1-« :,... w' : """ )", ~,.r~"'~i""4TI 0." . ~ tl:;"~ ~'--"2: tt.,~,., ;I~'.¡I~¡""-"';~ -I :',t::;~j; .II';"~ "'ï"~ - I ., ;x:; ~ ::;.), ': t '¡ (~I~ ~ --,---~---, ----'__:~.L- ' ISl,SO! n ;¡;" » ~ -. / / ~ . ,~~. 11/ /1 r " 0 ~ / ~ "', - I (,.~ / :1' ,-,..,. ,- 'I ...., / ). u 'ì:. ., . --t" n ~: ~>" , ,. "1 / ~ -i ,. I~ '1 ~~ / -. -/ _¡.,b I ;-f ", / / " 1 y> r)':/ /1 /, ' - I~ I~ :", 'r t~ .', .. r.:; , ,'" J'- - ':1" " " r- V I.~ J ,'" . ! ' ! ~, c: ~ '7' ~, ~ 'I' ", -1, m :11 :r. :)0- 0' (,1 ... ... '; ~ '" ",'en 1;;; I~: ~ C L' .... ... e ,~ ;:¡ ... 0 z - ZONE CHANGE :-,'f i:,"\. .¿. ,', 0 ... I::: ft {fI. " M-I-S TO P-D ,.lI ~ BEING A PORTION qr "-" . 0", THE I.SOUTH CAHPBELL NEIGI!;þORHOOD '~s>~ , ... ,DI~TRICT MAP OF THE CI TY~ [F "t::>v' ,^' CAMPBELL. J - Q, . / ~, . ", ;'4,' ~ , ", ~ublic hearing held ~ ~ /by the Planning Commissio ,,~'I:', ",'" ~ on September, ~, 8, 1972, ç, ' ~ = ' ~ Iv' '-«8."" ro ~,.,. í-- t i ~ ( ! : ~ ' /'>"""""'/1 td ~n .;! , tl. ,,), ¡ /' ~,,~:» ~ ..~. lj;S'~ ~ '^J / ~:!i ~~~!~ <> ... / ~r ~~¡¡¡... î ' n '~'-:f> / / .:¡! 1. ~.. .. . {~"-;' , /' . =~,hr f . ... ~ " t~¡~~ ;' :f~t~ ;l~1t l' I~ -' I I . ,I I 1 II A" ORD. #. 869 , '^ ,.. .... ~ ,~,:'~ /, ' " ,.---y"-'-,-,,,---- - ,\ : ~. "' '~~,p & rr"-~" 'j ,I " ", li~",; ~I (;J',;' , j: '" I' .. J' ," ,. .. I :'#'> , !.:2..c.. ? ~ -/i - -0,_" C'J("I,', ["PP! Tr!'~1 ififi ,)JI!/II,-_.',.dl.l',I\ r' ,,(," ~"",.y,--'I '1' T,. I' (I' ¡:,iJì,f Î ' L,:! t,,'- '.,nl!I;J~lL. . Fl ] c. ¡ T -~~ ,,*=..ll,¿_f_~<'_+ýJ_......Ji 1\1 E ---_Z f?,3/rL 1,1""')r~t.~'" ~ 1 CeV"-fr"..( 4u~ a1-~L/(L TEU.:PìIOi;r.:: ",,'i,!,,-,,"'-....--- -..--...,..........-.-..---.-------.-.-.---..-,-----.--t----- .- ---------.--........-----....,---- G" , ~ { " "'.,',"',' --,"",','1" 'f"t' 1_',- "¡-"'("",,- <G'--f,ç' ~ ,-,t,,',',,'., "v'--'\ 'r-'¡!I',-" ,"1,---, ,:..'" ~~." ~:'; -;-_~Jl¡_;;:------ --J - ~j --C;t.--j---. 11".',,\1..,_, ,,' J_-,_._,....._~{_._.._-- -~-_..~---."",...r____~__._._--_._.-\--_._---_.._----- .,....-.-...--...",..,..---..,...,.- ..,-......--.--.-,-- ,.,..-.,.....----....-.....,-.......-.---...-.....'-..'.....'..",,_..' (' " ( !' I) I d.' "f' ¡ !, 1 ..1. . ') ¿, ;3 S1I/\L.L 1: JCL,U ::ì[ : I' n /'1 , ;Lel !', tJ~ ,.j COPIES) s:¡cr,;¡¡.!G: r,') "II."~li:-"'~'" 1,/ L"..'Jl.L¡,,_,\.J/ r;) !)i':(\))[~¡-:T./ L.J.ì:ES C) LCC¡\-!'IU:; C'f: Sl(:¡!(,:~) S::r.u: :..\:, .'>!) tiC ¡, \ / \ i " ') I' .; \ \" / n) ,. '¡ ..:./ (3 CCYli.<) CF::Jll;!.! ¿;¡iO\II! (:~; U1 r';::-¡~:] c;,;s iJ,¡-[f:]j',LS c: u ! - 0 ¡, ,:; L:- r'ìT i\ :) j D:: 1.; U¡i,):.fcTICi T. -...-..,...... ........ ",---"""",.""""""".""--""""-""""""".'.. .' -""""--'."--""'-"'-'-."" .". .'.'._-'.. " , \.[,: ii';:; : (' \ ' ~!: ~, , \ " . S.i "" ,";', 'Ie:.: \/)'î' ,'1,(':::r'I",~)T',:f,.r,¡:í"(,,,(',(.,,',",""","'.':,-r,'~, , J' ,_.1 I" "... I. ,...... l.. '.' ,-- ',"("'(',',""'::'-j:(' T:¡¡-¡'[,', ;".' '~CI: ;~:'f~'\:~::"l"'" I./T: '¡,E,) "~~17r:'~, it """,..- .." "'.. i / L) S ¡; c> ¡" II. : i '; J 'r"~' I " ¡"{'J'" ... ." ' .. ,',::,1 ;, ,: " (..~.. \..,. ,:lL '.," ";:,,)':: r'/,I~:..'; t,f;F!_J , L /, " ~; , 1\" 7.,-~-:..j!j.._--- > ,:!. ¡' 11: r: '.. --"""""""'-""" ..""",...-- iJ': ¡J/'.'<;,; /}' F'I:L~~:.; i .: : ,:.:" r,'¡ ! t,C;: " T J' I >, ,:; ¡: ,) "., r T" I ¡, , i ,,\.',,/ ; ; ,,'!,' ¡ I~.. : .. :,' .. I I '" ,: ': ! !: ¡: .. ENVIKutUllirnAL (';Ht:cr.LIS'I TO BE USED BY 'filE CITY OF CAH1'ßELL IN MAKING AN - ..- '- ~ . -'1VIRONHENl'AL IMPACT ASSES'" '~NT I (INITIAL STUDY) . ...- I. -BACKGROUND 1. 2. II. ~: ~;~C~f R~~~~~~~t C~~~~i~:~d ~ 2.~r~-.lLJ1 5. Name of Proposal, 1f app11cãD1ë~ ~ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS "THe-- Plk-Tj (Ex plana t10ns of all ")fee" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) - YES MA YBE !Q... 1. Earth. Will the proposal result 1n: --- - - a. Unstable earth cond1 tio!')s or 1n changes 1n geologic substructures? b. Disrupt1ons, d1splacements, com- paction or over.cover1ng of the s011? ~ ~ c. Change in topography or ground surface re11ef features? ---- - ". d. ~e destruction, covering or modificat10n of any unique geologic or phys1cal reatures? ~ e. Any 1ncrease 1n w1nd or water erosion of s011s, either on or oft 1ihe slte? .".--- .- . .f. Changes In deposItIon or eros1on of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposit10n or erosion which may mod1fy the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? / - - 1 of 7 Pages . . 4. Plant Life. "In: Will the propos~l result a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, graca, . crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? c. Introduction of new species of' plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? d. Reduction in acreage of an~ agr1cultu~al crop? 5. Animal Life. result 1n: Will the proposal a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic or~anisme, insects or microfauna)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result 1n a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? 6. Will the proposal result 1n: Noise. a. Increases 1n existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? . 7. Light and Glare. ~ill the proposal produce new light or glare? :YES MÞ.YnENO - - - - - Land Use. Will the proposal result 1n a substantial alterat1on of the present or planned land use ot an area? - ,- 8. --- /' ....--- ---- ---- --- ~ ~ ~ /' ~ - /' , n r- 7 P.R"p~ . .' "0 0, . 15. 16. 17. ) a. Fire protection'! b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parks or other recJ'ea t1 onal facil1t1es? e. f.bintenance of public facil1.- ties, inc)uding roads? 1'. Other governmental services? Energy. Will the proposal result in: 8. Use of substantial amounts of 1'uel or energy? b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, ~r substantial alterations to the 1'ollowing utilities: 8. Power or natural gas? Communications systems? b. c. Water? d. Sewer or septic tanks? Storm water drainage? e. 1'. Solid waste and disposal? Human Health. Will the proposal result 1n:- 8. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding. mental health)'! b. Exposure of people to.potential health hazards? YES - MA YBE NO ~ ~ ....-- ./' .".- -::::::- / . ."..-- --- --- - ----- ....-- .,.-- -" ",-- /' .../" S of 7 Pages . III. DISCUSS.'" . OF EÞlVIRONKENTAL EVJ.LUA~ , " IV. DETERlt1INATION: . AFTER REVIEWING THE ENVIRO~~NTAL INFORMATION SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT. AND AFTER COMPLETING THE E~~IRONMENTAL CHECKLIST USED BY THE CITY OF-CAMPBELL IN ~XING AN E~~IRONMENTAL ASSESSYiliNT: ~ I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. . . D I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there w~ll not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described ~n an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATI~N WILL BE PREPARED. '. . D I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. Intc {!J~7. ~ 1172 / For" ;4~/þ¿ J/ ~ -- 7 of 7 Pages . ." :'. I: " " . " .' . ~TY OF C/~PBELL, CALIFOR: 1 "EIR-l , 1 NI TIAL STUDY , ENVIRON~lliNTAL INFOro'~TION FOR}I - TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT )" -: t ~ , ~'- ~- ,. '. ' r' . J. t: ~ , ,.... , .. i, ., , .. ~ " ..... ! ~. . fl.' I ., ' it;, ;š.' ", :-, ....' " , ;~' f, ~- , 0, ;. " t . ;i ¡' ~~' ~ . -' nate'Filed .GEJŒRAL 1rtlFORi-1A TIOJ-l 1., Name and ~ddress of developer or project sponsor: ~h.4ruJ {:\ fI\\ \\ ~ -Z-qx l. Ç~f'A'~C:::~ e-( e..~ -àt'):..F:- (.~. 'f <; J2~ \ . , J 2. Address of project:' ~3 ~ L~~TQ.AL.~. LÂ-(VIploe,11 Assessor1s Block and Lot ~umber 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: _rll~¡'.hLOAITJ',II~A.)) ßJI/ r11A:t.¿/JVCr-IJLÚv' ~"'3" 0 ' , ' ~ ~. Indicate number of the permit application for the project'to ~ which this I'orrn pertains: L . " i ~ ! .. ~ ¡ ~ . ~ 6. Existing zoning district: ~ g 5. List and describe any other related permits and other publ1,c' approvals required tor this project,--1ncluding those requ,ired by city, regional, state and I'ederal agencies: ' . ' 7. Proposed use çf site (Project for which this form is filed): ' ---5h.!2.p p ~ u <-- ~ r;:. ~ T Ç' t? ' PR(U"ECT DESCRIPTION (ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY) 8. .site size. 9. 'Square footage. ----- .' 10. 11. Number of rloors of construction. " Amount of off-street parking provided. 12. . At ta ch plans. 13. Proposed 8chedu11nc. l~. Associated projects. 15. Anticipated. incremental developmên1..~ - .; ... .. ,.-. J . :; - . . .', J; :.' - . ;: " .. ) " , . ,. ~- ~ .. \. J. { f' i,..c. , f: '- :- ,'~ t '" f; ~< ;- ~. i-. ~ ~ . '. L . . ì. ,. tr- .<... ~- .-. p,¡. \. ,;, ;.... i~' o. a: !r- f .~-.¡ " ~ 0, ,..- f;'" ," h .... r j!, .'~ ~ '. " ',:' ¡. i' r ¡ ~. ' l" i . 0 . . . .' . 16. If resIdential, include the number of units, schedule of un1t s1zes, range or Bale prices or rents, and type or household size -expected. 17. If commercial, indicate the type, whether ne1ghborhood, city or regionally or1ented, square footage of sales area, and loading 1'ac1l1t1es. 0 , . 18. Ir 1nduEtr1nl, indicate type, est1mated employment per shift, and i6ad1ng 1'acilit1~s. 19. If 1nstitutional,-1ndicate the major function, eatimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, ~oad1ng facilities, '0 and conununity benefits to be derived from the proJect~ . .. 20. If the project involves a var1ance, conditional.use oor.rezoning application, state th1s and indicate clearly why,the application 0 is required. ' . .0 0 . Are the following items applicable to the project or. its effects?' Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as " necessary) . 0 . .. ~ YES NO Ii -- ,..,.. ~ " i - ..:b- 21. Change in e~isting features of any bays, t1delands, ! . beaches, lakes or h1lls~ or substantial alteration of ~ groundoeontours. ' ' t: It ~ ~- z i . 0 ~ i 22. Change 1nscen1c views or vistas ~rom existing --- residential areas or public 1ands or roads. 0 -:Á- 23. Change in pattern, scale or ~haracter of general area of project. í. .24. Significant amounts of solid waste or lit.ter. ~ 25. Change in dust, ash. smoke. l'umes or odors in vicinity. .. . """. . --- ~26. Change 1n ocean; bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage . patterns. . --- -l( 27..' Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels 1n the vicinity. - 1)(....28. S1 tc on tilled land or: on elope ~r 10 percent 0" more. . --- ~ 29. u:;~ of disposal of potentially hazardous matc.'inls, such as toxic 8ubotancc's, flammables or explosives. f,', ...' " , f :..." 'f ' , . .~ .' ') .~ j f r ;. 'r .' f ¡a¡-.. . ,. ',' - ,'-., '" ¡t. ,,"p- ., ,';" ,~. f~ . . ~ if' ~': ',~' ,. - r f 1\ ,.. r: '"",. t. I If. ~. ;~ t~ "t.. " :r .,. ~-: ..:' i~ .,.' :. :; . F. ~:. ~~, í, .\: f. :~- ~ ~" Ê. t.)' ft I . . . . . - -' YES NO -- ~ 30. Substantial change in demand ror municipal services .(police, fire, water, sewage, etc.). --- ~ 31. Substantially increase fo~c11 fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). --- ~ 32. Relationship toa larger proJ~ct or series of projects. . ' ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING. 33. Describe the project s~te as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid ~lotoa will be accepted. . . 34'. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic t aspects. Indicate the type of land use (r~s1dential, commercial, ~ eta.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, ! department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, ~ frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the. ! vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. . III .. ¡ . ~ ~ CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements rurnished Z above and in the attached exhibits present the data and 1nfor- g mati on required for this ini~ial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to bhe best of my knowledge and belief. '~ Inte ~'?rJ~ ( gna ture) . For - . . '" -Z ...