PC Min 08/10/2004
CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
7:30 P.M.
TUESDAY
AUGUST 10, 2004
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The Planning Commission meeting of August 10,2004, was called to order at 7:30 p.m., in the
Council Chambers, 70 North First Street, Campbell, California by Chair Doorley and the
following proceedings were had, to wit:
ROLL CALL
Commissioners Present:
Chair:
Vice Chair:
Commissioner:
Commissioner:
Commissioner:
Commissioner:
George Doorley
Elizabeth Gibbons
Bob Alderete
Tom Francois
Joseph D. Hernandez
Bob Roseberry
Commissioners Absent:
Commissioner:
Michael Rocha
Staff Present:
Community
Development Director:
Senior Planner:
Planner I:
City Attorney
Recording Secretary:
Sharon Fierro
Geoff I. Bradley
Stephanie Willsey
William Seligmann
Corinne A. Shinn
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion: On motion of Commissioner Francois, seconded by Commissioner
Roseberry, the Planning Commission minutes of July 27, 2004, were
approved with a correction to page 9. (5-0-1-1; Commissioner Rocha was
absent and Commissioner Alderete abstained)
COMMUNICATIONS
There were no communications items.
AGENDA MODIFICATIONS OR POSTPONEMENTS
Director Sharon Fierro advised that Agenda Item No.2 is proposed for continuance to August
24, 2004.
Planning Commission Minutes of August 10, 2004
Page 2
ORAL REQUESTS
There were no oral requests.
***
PUBLIC HEARING
Chair Doorley read Agenda Item No. 1 into the record.
1. PLN2004-82
Petit, J.
Continued Public Hearing (from the Planning Commission meeting of
July 27,2004) to consider the application of Ms. Julie Petit, on behalf
of Equity Office Properties for a Master Sign Plan and Sign Exception
(PLN2004-82) for the Prune Y ard Shopping Center on property owned
by Equity Office Properties located at 1875 S. Bascom Avenue in a
C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Staff is recommending
that this project be deemed Categorically Exempt under CEQA.
Planning Commission decision final, unless appealed in writing to the
City Clerk within 10 days. Project Planner: Stephanie Willsey,
Planner I
Ms. Stephanie Willsey, Planner I, presented the staff report as follows:
· Advised that the applicant is seeking approval of a new Master Sign Plan and Sign
Exception, which includes modifications to the existing main and secondary monument
signs, modifications to the existing directional signs and replacement of most tenant signs.
· Informed that the Planning Commission approved the last sign program for the Prune Yard
in 1996. Since that since that time, some of the major tenants have obtained Sign
Exceptions.
· Explained that the current proposal includes three types of individual tenant signs, Flagship
Tenant roof-mounted signs, Small Tenant roof-mounted signs and beam-mounted signs.
Typically signs are wall mounted but the architecture of the Prune Yard does not offer
sufficient area to accommodate signage. Several of the existing signs have been damaged
by passing trucks due to their lowered placement.
· Stated that each of the tenant signs would be replaced to meet this Sign Plan by 2005
except for the Major Tenant signs that were previously approved by the Planning
Commission. The new signs would be internally lit channel letters. Each tenant will have
one sign except for Le Boulanger and Lisa's Tea Treasures, which would have two signs
each due to their corner placement.
· Recommended that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution approving this Master
Sign Plan and Sign Exception subject to the findings and conditions of approval.
Commissioner Hernandez asked staff for the rationale behind the 2005 completion date as
opposed to sooner.
Planner Stephanie Willsey replied that an earlier deadline would result in a hardship for some
of the smaller businesses that must pay for their own signs.
Commissioner Hernandez sought clarification that the tenants rather than Equity Offices would
pay for these signs.
Planning Commission Minutes of August 10, 2004
Page 3
Planner Stephanie Willsey replied yes.
Commissioner Hernandez asked why not all signs are required to be in conformance with this
plan. He questioned whether it was not required or a cost issue.
Planner Stephanie Willsey replied that the signs not required to be changed obtained individual
Planning Commission approval. Some of the signs requiring updating were glaringly out of
compliance.
Commissioner Gibbons presented the Site and Architectural Review Committee Permit report
as follows:
· SARC reviewed this proposal twice.
· Reported that the issue of signs gets a lot of attention.
· Advised that this Master Sign Plan and Exception is complex and not minor.
· Expressed appreciation to all parties for the efforts that went into developing this plan.
· Said that SARC is supportive but was concerned about the potential for an over
concentration of roof-mounted signs, which could equal a cluttered appearance.
· Reminded that typically roof-mounted signs are not permitted. In this case the roof-
mounted signs are to be located under a ridge of the roof and not on the roof itself. This
was decided after a lengthy discussion.
· Said that the applicant was asked to provide additional information on the roof-mounted
signs and did so.
· Reminded that some of the existing signs had been damaged due to their lowered
placement.
Commissioner Roseberry reiterated that typically roofline signs are discouraged.
Commissioner Gibbons:
· Continued her SARC report by stating that a number of discussions have been held and this
request encompasses a range of signs with a lot to be discussed.
· Reported that the applicant provided the information requested by SARC.
· Added that SARC is requiring that there be a minimum 10- foot distance between each
roof-mounted sign.
· Said that this is a challenging presentation and that Planner Stephanie Willsey did an
excellent job with her staff report.
Chair Doorley asked why the monument signs require added height.
Planner Stephanie Willsey replied that the height is needed to accommodate the proposed logo
cap feature.
Chair Doorley opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No I.
Chair Doorley closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No.1.
Planning Commission Minutes of August 10, 2004
Page 4
Motion:
Upon motion of Commissioner Gibbons, seconded by Francois, the
Planning Commission Adopted Resolution No. 3579 approving a Master
Sign Plan and Sign Exception (PLN2004-82) for the Prune Yard Shopping
Center on property owned by Equity Office Properties located at 1875 S.
Bascom Avenue and found this project to be Categorically Exempt under
CEQA, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Alderete, Doorley, Francois, Gibbons, Hernandez, and
Roseberry
None
Rocha
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Chair Doorley advised that this action is final unless appealed in writing to the City Clerk
within 10 days.
***
Chair Doorley read Agenda Item No.2 into the record.
2. PLN2004-65
A-Elyacy, N.
Public Hearing to consider the application of Mr. Nasir A-Elyacy for a
Site and Architectural Review Permit (PLN2004-65) for a new single-
family residence on property owned by Mr. Nasir A.-Elyacy located at
475 Waldo Road in an R-1-10 (Single Family Residential) Zoning
District. Staff is recommending that this project be deemed
Categorically Exempt under CEQA. Planning Commission decision
final, unless appealed in writing to the City Clerk within 10 days.
Project Planner: Tim J Haley, Associate Planner.
Director Sharon Fierro presented the following update:
. Advised that staff is recommending that the Commission continue consideration of this
item to the next meeting on August 24, 2004.
. Reported that staff believes that the revised elevations provided by the applicant
substantially complies with the requests made by SARC. This item would go before SARC
for a second time immediately preceding the next PC meeting on August 24th.
Chair Doorley opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No 2.
Motion:
Upon motion of Commissioner Francois, seconded by Commissioner
Roseberry, the Planning Commission continued consideration of a Site and
Architectural Review Permit for a new single-family residence on property
located at 475 Waldo Road to the next Planning Commission meeting to be
held on August 24,2004. (6-0-1; Commission Rocha was absent)
***
REPORT OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
The written report of Ms. Sharon Fierro, Community Development Director, was accepted as
presented with the following additions:
Planning Commission Minutes of August 10, 2004
Page 5
· Advised that at its last meeting Council authorized the placement of costs for abating
weeds onto the tax rolls. There are just three properties impacted this year.
· Stated that the next Planning agenda consists of two items.
· Discussed Commission interest in conducting some Study Sessions to provide the
Commissioners with additional training in subjects of interest. She asked how many
Commissioners would be interested in such Study Sessions and suggested that individual
Commissioners report back to her to identify areas of interest. She said that appropriate
speakers would be secured.
· Reminded that she had forwarded a web link via email message to the League of California
Cities Commissioners Handbook.
· Reported that some cities have Study Sessions to determine issues of interest while others
have Study Sessions prior to Planning Commission meetings approximately once a month.
· Informed that she is participating on a Water Collaborative that is developing best practices
to protect water quality in this County.
Commissioner Gibbons:
· Said that holding training Study Sessions is a great idea.
· Suggested that discussions on the Environmental and Energy Conservation section of the
General Plan would be a valuable topic to discuss.
· Said that well versed speakers on the issue of green building, their benefits and how the
community can support it would be beneficial.
· Stated that she would be happy to organize such a session and that she knows of qualified
presenters.
Director Sharon Fierro thanked Commissioner Gibbons for her offer to assist with coordinating
this presentation. Agreed that these sessions would result in an additional commitment of time
by the Commissioners. Reminded that the Commission has held such Study Sessions on a
project basis in the past.
Commissioner Hernandez asked Director Sharon Fierro whether there are any recurring themes
or patterns that have developed.
Director Sharon Fierro replied that traffic calming issues, policies and procedures is one. She
agreed that themes could be identified.
Chair Doorley said that the issue of traffic is a given. Said that he could support anything that
could further educate the Commission on traffic issues.
Commissioner Gibbons asked staff for an update on the Kohl's project.
Director Sharon Fierro reported that Breuner's has filed for Chapter 11, which is liquidation
rather than reorganization. This has stalled the project a little. She stated that the project could
go forward with a different retail use.
ADJOURNMENT
The Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 7:57 p.m. to the next Regular Planning
Commission Meeting of August 24, 2004.
Planning Commission Minutes of August 10, 2004
Page 6
SUBMITTED BY:
~~
Corinne A. Shinn, Recording Secretary
ATTEST:
Æ~~~~Lœry
APPROVED BY: