Loading...
Pre-App - Storage Facility - Withdrawn - 2018Daniel Fama From: Jim Chalmers <jchalmers@isscontainers.com> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2018 4:40 PM To: Daniel Fama Cc: Kelly Snider; Brett Henry (bhenry@trojanstorage.com); Whitstone, Nick @ San Jose (Nick.WhitstoneC~cbre.com); Prosser, Scott @ San Jose (Scott.Prosser@cbre.com) Subject: Prior Pre-Application Submittal - 700 McGlincy Avenue Phase II Daniel, Please withdraw my Prelim Application dated February 1, 2018, as I have decided to proceed with a different proposal with Trojan Storage as applicant. Best Regards, Jim Chalmers Instant Storage Service, Inc. ichalmers(c~isscontainers.com PH: 1-408-377-1400 FAX: 1-408-371-1846 In51'Af'1T 5T6~'iAtsE SESdViCE DISCLAIMER: The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and destroy any copies of this document and any attachments. Daniel Fama ~~~ From: Daniel Fama Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 10:04 AM To: 'gordon wong'; 'LongNguyen@gkwarchitects.com' Subject: RE: FW: McGlincy Ln. Storage Building Pre-App - PRE2018-02 Attachments: PRE2018-02 700 McGlincy Ln PC 18-0484.pdf Fire District comments From: Daniel Fama Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 10:33 AM To: 'gordon wong'; 'LongNguyen@gkwarchitects.com' Subject: RE: FW: McGlincy Ln. Storage Building Pre-App - PRE2018-02 Hi Long/cordon -Just to recap this morning's meeting. Before we schedule a Planning Commission study session, you'll provide the following: • An additional simulation showing the rear of the building and its relationship to the residential neighborhood • A letter from a land use attorney explaining why the easements on the property cannot be removed • Preliminary analysis of C-3 requirements so that it can be understood if the site configuration can adequately accommodate stormwater management facilities • Copy of the existing development's CC&Rs. I'm also attaching comments from Building and Public Works. I should have Fire Department comments later this week. Daniel O~ •c,',~A Daniel Fama ',S4• ~~c Senior Planner V r City of Campbell ~ Community Development Department 0 0 70 N. First Street I Campbell, CA 95008 ti~ `~~C' www.cityofcampbell.com ~ 408.866.2193 • ~RCHAB~ . From: gordon wong [mailto:gordonkwongCa~gkwarchitects.com] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2018 5:44 PM To: Daniel Fama Cc: LongNguyenCc~gkwarchitects.com Subject: Re: FW: McGlincy Ln. Storage Building Pre-App - PRE2018-02 Thank you, On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 8:47 AM, Daniel Fama <danielf(a,cit of~m~bell.com> wrote: From: Long Nguyen [mailto:IonanQUVenCa~gkwarchitects com] Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2018 2:14 PM To: Daniel Fama Cc: gordonkwongCc~gkwarchitects.com Subject: Re: FW: McGlincy Ln. Storage Building Pre-App - PRE2018-02 Hi Daniel, Would next Wednesday (02/21) at 9:30 am work for you? Thanks, Long On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Daniel Fama <danielf(a,cit o~pbell.com> wrote: Hi Gordon - I'd like to schedule a meeting to discuss this pre-app. I'm very concerned that the nominal change-the notch in the back-isn't sufficient to get a different or favorable response from the Planning Commission or the neighboring residents. When it comes down to it I don't waste your time or the Planning Commission's time. Also, as heads up, the plans don't take into account contemporary stormwater management requirements which will require a substantially amount of the parking lot to be utilized for treatment area. Lastly, I still think there needs to be serious consideration to unwinding the easements that are encumbering this property. If that can be achieved, these buildings can be flattened which will significantly reduce their massing. This will be brought up at the Planning Commission study session. I'm open next Wednesday. Let me know if you any time that day. Daniel From: Long Nguyen [mailto:IongnguvenCa~gkwarchitects.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 11:59 AM To: Daniel Fama Subject: Re: FW: McGlincy Ln. Storage Building Pre-App - PRE2015-04 Hi Daniel, Thanks for the the information. We look forward to working with you on this project. Thank you, Long On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:18 AM, Daniel Fama <danielf(a~ rt o~campbell.com> wrote: FYI From: Daniel Fama Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 9:15 AM To: 'gordon wong'; 'Jim Chalmers' Cc: Aki Snelling Subject: RE: McGlincy Ln. Storage Building Pre-App - PRE2015-04 Good Morning: I hope last night's study session was informative. Clearly, there are concerns from both the neighbors and the Commission on the project concept. As a quick recap, here are key points as I heard them: • Height: Certainty four stories was as anon-starter. It's seen as too imposing for the residential neighbors. Should you go forward, this building should be brought down in height. Perhaps, shifting the massing and height away (stepping/tapering) from the residential homes at the rear could be considered. • Land Use: Whether this is the best use for the site seems to bean open question. Further explanation as to why this approach was taken will likely be necessary. Some Commissioners had issue with the single purpose building General Plan policy, but I think there's some recognition that this site is already storage and the project wouldn't change that. • Condominiumization: There seemed to some concern about the desirability of splitting the buildings into separate air parcels. More explanation as to how a owners association and CC&Rs would be structured may help to alleviate some concerns. That being said, perhaps limiting condo mapping to no more than two condo parcels per building should be the most that should be proposed. Four owners seems reasonable, eight or more, less so. • Design: It appears the design approach was generally supported. Concerns regarding the overall size/FAR were a reflection of the building's height. Working on window placement to further maximize visibility into the building should also be considered. • Operational Characteristics: Explaining how the facility will operate is important, particularly with respect to hours of operation, safety/security, lighting, and noise generation. • Caretaker unit: Please ensure that the caretakers unit is reduced in size to 640 sq. ft. per CMC 21.36.040. If you wish, we can schedule a meeting to discuss next steps. Thank you, Daniel Daniel Fama ~ Associate Planner Community Development Department ~ Planning Division danielft~cityofcampbell.com ~ 408.866.2193 ~ g 408.871.5140 ® 70 N. First Street, Campbell, CA 95008 From: Daniel Fama Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 1:02 PM To: 'gordon wong'; 'Jim Chalmers' Subject: RE: McGlincy Ln. Storage Building Pre-App - PRE2015-04 Hi Gordon and Jim, Here's an electronic copy of the Tuesday's staff memo. Let me know if you have any questions. Daniel From: gordon wong f mailto:gordonkwongCa~gkwarchitects.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 11:56 AM To: Daniel Fama Cc: ]im Chalmers Subject: Re: McGlincy Ln. Storage Building Pre-App - PRE2015-04 Thank you Daniel, I will bring those 10 copies shortly. Have a nice day, On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Daniel Fama <danielf(a~cityofcampbell.com> wrote: Hi Jim, Just a quick follow up. We're scheduled for a May 26th "study session" meeting with the Planning Commission to discuss your preliminary proposal. We have a few items that evening, so you should plan for a late night. The meeting will start at 7:30 PM. For the study session, I'll provide a brief presentation to provide context for the pre-application review. However, the purpose of the meeting is to allow you to engage the Commission in dialog. To that extent, it's typically expected that the applicant prepare a presentation, which should do the following: • Introduce the development team; • Describe the project; • Discuss the approach or process the development team has undertaken to arrive at this particular development proposal; • Discuss the factors that were considered in developing the site plan, scale and general orientation of the development; • Discuss what architectural style and/or features will be proposed and why; and • Discuss the merits of the project with respect to City-wide community benefit or value added to the neighborhood. Also, for the meeting I'll need ten 11"x17" copies of the plans. Let me know if you have any questions, Daniel Daniel Fama ~ Associate Planner Community Development Departments Planning Division danielf(a,cityofcampbell.com ~i 408.866.2193 ~ 8 408.871.5140 ® 70 N. First Street, Campbell, CA 95008 Gordon K Wong Reg. Architect ~ Constructor Lic # C-34045 AIA, LEED GA, BUILD IT GREEN Lic # B-1001525 CSLB, GENERAL BUILDING CONTRACTOR 5 408.315.2125 OFFICE DIRECT ~~ Main Office Silicon Valley Address 710E MC GLINCY LANE SUITE 109 Bus. Center CAMPBELL, CA 95008 Website GKWARCHITECTS.COM Long Nguyen Architectural Designer 408.796.1845 U.S. OFFICE DIRECT 950.404.72595 CHINA OFFICE DIRECT Main Office Silicon Valley Address 710E MC GLINCY LANE SUITE 109 Bus. Center CAMPBELL, CA 95008 Website GKWARCHITECTS.COM Long Nguyen Architectural Designer 408.796.1845 U.S. OFFICE DIRECT 950.404.72595 CHINA OFFICE DIRECT 6