Loading...
PC Min 03/28/2000CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 7:30 P.M. MARCH 28, 2000 CITY HALL COUNCIl. CHAMBERS TUESDAY The Planning Commission meeting 'of March 28, 2000, was called to order at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers, 70 North First Street, Campbell, California by Chairperson Gibbons, and the following proceedings were had, to wit: ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Chair: Vice Chair: Commissioner: Commissioner: Commissioner: Commissioner: Commissioner: Elizabeth Gibbons Mel Lindstrom Tom Francois Joseph D. Hernandez Brad Jones Susan A. Kearns Dennis Lowe Commissioners Absent: None Staff Present: Interim Community Development Director: Associate Planner: Planner I: Redevelopment Manager: Redevelopment: City Attorney: Reporting Secretary: Sharon Fierro Tim J. Haley Aki Irani Kirk Heinrichs Geoff Bradley William Seligmann Corinne A. Shinn APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: On motion of Commissioner Lowe, seconded by Commissioner Francois, the Planning Commission minutes of March 14, 2000, were approved. (6- 0-0-1, Commissioner Jones abstained as he was absent from the March 14, 2000, meeting.) COMMUNICATIONS. There were no communication items. Planning Commission Minutes of March 28, 2000 Page 2 AGENDA MODIFICATIONS OR POSTPONEMENTS There were no agenda modifications or postponements. ORAL REQUESTS There were no oral requests. PUBLIC HEARING Chairperson Gibbons read Agenda Item No. 1 into the record. PLN2000-15 Beutler, R. Public Hearing to consider the application of Mr. Ron Beutler, on behalf of Norcal Vocational Inc., for a Conditional Use Permit (PLN2000-15) to allow the establishment of an activity center providing jobs and job training for developmentally disabled adults and allowing an on-site caretaker's living unit on property located at 195 E. Sunnyoaks Avenue in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. This project is Categorically Exempt. Planning Commission decision final, unless appealed in writing to the City Clerk within 10 days. Mr. Tim J. Haley, Associate Planner, presented the staff report as follows: · Advised that the applicant is seeking a Conditional Use Permit to allow the establishment of an activity center for developmentally disabled adults · Stated that there will be 40 clients, from the ages of 18 through 59, and 13 staff. · Advised that the frontage of the building, formerly occupied by a termite control business, will be re-landscaped. · Said that 20 parking spaces are provided which is more than adequate. · Informed that the hours of operation are 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. for staff and 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. for clients. · Stated that the applicant also seeks approval for the use of an on-site caretaker's unit, which is existing on site. · Surrounding uses are mini storage facilities to the north, east and west and mixed-use industrial to the south. · Recommended adoption of a Resolution approving this project as it is compatible with the surrounding uses in the area. Chairperson Gibbons asked if the Use Permit to allow this use is good only for this specific applicant. Mr. Tim J. Haley advised that the Use Permit runs with the property not the applicant. Commissioner Lowe asked why a living unit is needed on this site. Mr. Tim J. Haley advised that the 500 square foot living unit is existing and the applicant wants to have a caretaker on site to oversee the equipment and to be available in case of emergency. Planning Commission Minutes of March 28, 2000 Page 3 Chairperson Gibbons opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 1. Mr. Robert Stinson, Applicant's Representative: · Thanked staff and SARC members for their consideration of this project. · Stated that he was available for any questions. Commissioner Lowe asked for further information about the need for an on-site living unit. Mr. Robert Stinson advised that since it is an existing living unit, that has until just recently been inhabited, the applicants want to continue its use for security purposes for the site. Mr. Glenn Kinsey, Property Owner's Representative, K&K Realty, Inc., 1777 W. Hamilton Avenue, #100, San Jose: · Asked that the requirement for Storm Drain Fee be removed as this is an old building and such fees must have been paid in the past. · Added that the apartment on site has been there for many years and represents an affordable housing unit for the City. · Advised that the living unit was built when a veterinarian occupied the site. Commissioner Lowe asked staff if having an on-site living unit is acceptable. Ms. Sharon Fierro, Interim Community Development Director: · Advised that the request to use the on-site living unit is reasonable. · Added that the Conditions mandate that the inhabitant of this living unit must be an employee of the business. Should a non-employee occupy the unit, this would be a violation of the Use Permit and could result in a hearing to rescind the Use Permit approval. Ms. Susan Savage, Norcal Vocational, Inc., 1427 Monte Marie Avenue, Novato: · Stated that they would not be renting out the apartment. An employee will occupy the unit to provide on-site security for their expensive equipment and to be available should a client have an emergency. Mr. Glenn Kinsey added that in the interests of the property owner, this living unit should be allowed to be occupied in the future even if another occupant later leases the space. Ms. Sharon Fierro advised that the living unit is located in an industrial area and can only be used to support the business operating there. As is the case with this current application, only an employee of the occupying business can inhabit this living unit as a part of conducting that business. Commissioner Lowe asked for clarification about the requirement for a Storm Drain Fee. Planning Commission Minutes of March 28, 2000 Page 4 Mr. Tim J. Haley advised that this is a standard requirement from the Public Works Department. If the property owner can demonstrate that they have already paid into the Storm Drain Fee account, the Public Works Department would be satisfied that this Condition has been met. Commissioner Lowe expressed his appreciation in seeing a site with more parking than required, something that does not occur often. Chairperson Gibbons closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 1. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Lindstrom, seconded by Commissioner Hernandez, the Planning Commission Adopted Resolution No. 3263 approving a Conditional Use Permit (PLN2000-15) to allow the establishment of an activity center providing jobs and job training for developmentally disabled adults and allowing an on-site caretaker's living unit on property located at 195 E. Sunnyoaks Avenue, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Francois, Gibbons, Hernandez, Jones, Kearns, Lindstrom, Lowe NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Chairperson Gibbons advised that this item is final in 10 days unless appealed in writing to the City Clerk. Chairperson Gibbons read Agenda Item No. 2 into the record. 2 PLN2000-07 Johnson, W. Public Hearing to consider the application of Mr. Wayne Johnson for a Modification (PLN2000-07) to a previously-approved Conditional Use Permit (UP 70-03) to allow the remodel of an existing car wash on property located at 125 S. San Tomas Aquino Road in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. This project is Categorically Exempt. Planning Commission decision final, unless appealed in writing to the City Clerk within 10 days. Ms. Darcy Smith, Planner I, presented the staff report as follows: · Advised that the applicant is seeking approval of a Modification to a previously-approved Conditional Use Permit to allow the remodel of an existing car wash located at 125 S. San Tomas Aquino Road within the Kirkwood Auto Center. · The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan Land Use and with the C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District where this use is permitted with a Use Permit. · The proposed remodel includes a 42 square foot drive through cashier building; 2,000 square feet of trellis across the driveway and attached to the buildings; new planting islands; and a new fence and arbor. Planning Commission Minutes of March 28, 2000 Page 5 · Staff finds that this will be an attractive upgrade. · The proposed paint will match the adjacent Kirkwood Shopping Center. · SARC reviewed this project on March 14 and was supportive. · Staff recommends adoption of a Resolution approving a Modification to approved Conditional Use Permit. the previously Commissioner Lowe expressed concern that it appears that the work has already begun on this project prior to this evening's meeting and a formal approval by the Commission. Ms. Darcy Smith, Planner I, advised that any work on site is without any staff authorization with the exception of added equipment within the building. Commissioner Lindstrom presented the Site and Architectural Review Committee meeting as follows: · This project was reviewed on March 14, 2000. · SARC is supportive and finds that this project will result in a total upgrade of the area. Chairperson Gibbons opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 2. Commissioner Lowe asked the applicant to come forward and explain why work has begun prior to approvals. Mr. Wayne Johnson, Applicant, 125 S. San Tomas Aquino Road: · Advised that he needed to re-slope the concrete on the site to prevent water from the car wash area from entering into the storm drains. · Said that additionally, they have had rodent-infested ivy removed, dead bushes removed and a new lawn installed in its place. Chairperson Gibbons closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 2. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Lindstrom, seconded by Commissioner Kearns, the Planning Commission Adopted Resolution No. 3264 approving a Modification (PLN2000-07) to a previously-approved Conditional Use Permit (UP 70-03) to allow the remodel of an existing car wash on property located at 125 S. San Tomas Aquino Road, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Francois, Gibbons, Hernandez, Jones, Kearns, Lindstrom, Lowe NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Chairperson Gibbons advised that this item is final in 10 days unless appealed in writing to the City Clerk. Planning Commission Minutes of March 28, 2000 Page 6 MISCELLANEOUS 3. Staff Review and comment on conceptual design for Downtown Parking Structure located on Civic Center Drive between Second and Third Streets in the C-3-S (Central Business District) Zoning District. Tentative City Council Meeting Date: April 18, 2000. Chairperson Gibbons advised that the Commission is actually being asked following: 1. A finding that the proposed use is compatible to the City's General Plan. 2. Support for the acquisition of the parcels. 3. Support for the Land Use. 4. Recommendation for the adoption of a Negative Declaration. to consider the Mr. Kirk Heinrichs, Redevelopment Manager, presented the staff report as follows: · Advised that in early 1999, Council authorized an extensive analysis for a new downtown parking structure. Added that Council identified the site and authorized a contract with Gordon Chung & Associates for the conceptual design of the parking structure. · Council later appointed an oversight committee, which met three times between October 1999 and February 2000. · At a Council Study Session on March 7, the design concepts were presented and Council authorized staff to proceed. · On April 18th, Council will be reviewing the design concept and will authorize the development of a Master Development Plan for this project. · Advised that the Planning Commission must make a finding that this proposal is consistent with the City's General Plan. · Added that the Commission's comments on the design will be forwarded to Council. · Advised that an Environmental Assessment was prepared by David Powers & Associates which included a Traffic Study. · The proposed parking structure will include 37,000 square feet on three levels, one at grade and two above grade. There will be approximately 300 spaces. · The average height for the structure is 25-26 feet with some areas higher. The elevator shaft is 40 feet high. · Advised that DKS Associates did a study and determined that between 250 and 350 parking spaces are needed in the parking structure. · Building materials include brick (used in a variety of applications and directions), terra cotta tile, and metal grills. Consideration is being given to including public art on the wall at Civic Center Drive and Second Street. · The trellis metal grill with landscaping within a five-foot planter and sidewalk with streetscape and street trees will be incorporated. Planning Commission Minutes of March 28, 2000 Page 7 · Advised that two neighborhood meetings were held and noticed to the residents of First, Second and Third Streets. · The residents attending had no interest in the building design but rather their concerns were concentrated on traffic impacts in their neighborhood. · Advised that there are existing concerns about traffic on Third Street which runs through to Hamilton. · There is no significant impact on traffic. Ingress and egress will be from Second and Third Streets. Signage will be used to deter people from using the residential areas for access or parking. Commissioner Hernandez asked about the stairwell towers. Mr. Kirk Heinrichs advised that there is one elevator tower and two stairwell towers. Commissioner Francois asked for the reason for the metal elements. Mr. Kirk Heinrichs advised that the metal elements were for architectural effect. Commissioner Jones expressed concern that the public is not present to discuss this project and asked how this item was noticed to the public. Mr. Kirk Heinrichs advised that this is a public project and will go to a noticed Public Hearing before the City Council on April 18th. Ms. Sharon Fierro advised that this is a different type of project from those that the Commission is accustomed to reviewing. No public noticing is required. While the Planning Commission is usually providing a final action or recommendation to Council, Council reviews this item directly. Commissioner Jones: · Reiterated that input from the public is very important and not having it is a major concern for him. · Added that the City will be acquiring and redeveloping an entire block of the downtown. · Suggested that, perhaps in partnership with a private developer, a better design can be obtained for the entire block rather than constructing the garage first and later developing the rest of the block. Mr. Kirk Heinrichs agreed that that is the plan. A Master Development Plan will be adopted that will include Commercial Mixed Uses. Added that the Commission can made comments on the design of the parking structure which will be forwarded to Council. Commissioner Lowe concurred with Commissioner Jones. Planning Commission Minutes of March 28, 2000 Page Mr. Kirk Heinrichs: · Advised that public funds are available to spend on the construction of the garage. · Added that this is not a for-pay parking structure but rather will provide free parking to the public. There is no incentive for a developer to construct this parking structure. Added that on April 18t~ the design and Master Development Plan will be adopted by Council to allow the issuance of Requests for Proposals. Chairperson Gibbons added that there are two parts to this project, the parking structure and the development of the remaining parcel. Mr. Kirk Heinrichs reminded the Commission that the Redevelopment Agency's intent is to pursue a Master Development Plan. Commissioner Jones asked for more information about a traffic policy for this neighborhood. Mr. Kirk Heinrichs advised that Council has asked Public Works staff to develop a traffic policy to deal with the traffic concerns. A Study Session on this subject will occur in April. Added that the traffic study indicates that there is no traffic impact from this proposed parking structure. The existing problem on Third Street is the result of that street running directly through to Hamilton Avenue. Commissioner Jones suggested developing the entire block site at the same time. Commissioner Lowe concurred and stated that he does not understand why the City is developing around the existing building which is not part of the Master Development Plan. Mr. Kirk Heinrichs advised that the cost of buying that particular building, which includes 12,000 square feet of office space with multiple tenants, would cost a lot. Commissioner Jones asked for a cost estimate for the land the City would need to purchase. Mr. Kirk Heinrichs advised that the property is currently being appraised and that he was hesitant to state a value as land prices are going up every day and negotiations will begin soon. Commissioner Jones asked if Study Sessions are open to the public. Mr. Kirk Heinrichs advised that all Study Sessions are open to the public. Commissioner Jones asked if the Study Sessions are noticed. Mr. Kirk Heinrichs advised that they are posted but not noticed. Chairperson Gibbons asked to see a landscape plan. Planning Commission Minutes of March 28, 2000 Page 9 Mr. Kirk Heinrichs advised that the landscape plan is not developed at this point. Chairperson Gibbons asked if any trees would be removed with this new parking structure. Mr. Kirk Heinrichs advised that 15 trees would be removed. Chairperson Gibbons asked if the parcels will be consolidated. Mr. Kirk Heinrichs replied that the parcels would be consolidated. Chairperson Gibbons asked when the last community meeting was held on this parking structure. Mr. Kirk Heinrichs advised that the last community meeting was held on February 8, 2000. Chairperson Gibbons asked if this current conceptual proposal was the one provided at that meeting. Mr. Kirk Heinrichs replied that substantially, these are the plans that were reviewed at that meeting. Commissioner Jones asked about the use of the other downtown parking garage at the Water Tower. Mr. Kirk Heinrichs replied that that garage is pretty full. Mr. Geoff Bradley, Redevelopment Coordinator, elaborated on the existing downtown parking garage, saying that a study was done about two years ago where cars were counted at peak office hours. At that time approximately 70 spaces were free of the 300 available. Recently, about 30 cars were free of the 300 available. Chairperson Gibbons added that approximately 100 on-street parking spaces were added downtown. Commissioner Jones asked if the loop street parking would be retained. Mr. Kirk Heinrichs replied that they absolutely would be retained. He added that approximately 15-20 spaces would be lost downtown when the Light Rail goes through and that demand for parking would also increase with Light Rail. Commissioner Lowe asked about signs for the parking garage. Ms. Sharon Fierro, Interim Community Development Director, advised that there is no sign program at this time. Planning Commission Minutes of March 28, 2000 Page 10 Commissioner Lowe asked if the signs proposed for the parking structure exceed the Sign Ordinance would the sign application come before the Planning Commission. City Attorney William Seligmann advised that public projects must comply with the same rules as private developers. Mr. Kirk Heinrichs added that this is a CIP project and that this is the last chance for comments on the conceptual design of the parking structure. Chairperson Gibbons stated that the Commission usually requires color samples and colored elevations. City Attorney William Seligmann informed the Commission that the City does not even own the property yet. Before a final application can be processed, the City must own the property. Mr. Kirk Heinrichs said that this is an approval of a conceptual design not a final approval. Commissioner Hernandez stated that it appears that what is being asked of the Commission is narrow in scope. Mr. Kirk Heinrichs advised that the role of the Planning Commission in review of public projects is limited. He added that CIP projects don't generally come before the Planning Commission. Commissioner Francois stated that Mr. Heinrichs has explained the role of the Commission in this project pretty well. Commissioner Lindstrom stated that some aspects of this project are just conceptual at this point. The Commission is trying to take on responsibilities it does not have in this matter. Chairperson Gibbons discussed the wide variety of proposed building materials including brick and decorative grills. Commissioner Lowe expressed confusion over the role of the Planning Commission. Said that he would like to see a more homogeneous approach to the project. Said that it appears the design of the parking structure is fine. Commissioner Jones reiterated the importance of public comment on this project and suggested continuing consideration to the next Planning Commission meeting in order to notify the public. City Attorney William Seligmann advised that that would play havoc on the schedule and that the Planning Commission has no authority to require notification, only Council does. Commissioner Jones stated that he wants to hear public comment prior to approving or denying this project. Planning Commission Minutes of March 28, 2000 Page 11 Commissioner Hemandez stated that Commissioner Jones has made some good points. Added that at previously held meetings, few members of the public showed up and those that did had no comment on the structure design but rather concerns about traffic impacts. It does not appear that there is much public input. Commissioner Jones insisted that this is input that the Planning Commission has not heard. Commissioner Lindstrom disagreed and stated that opportunity for public input has occur and that public input has been received. City Attorney William Seligmann clarified the Commission's role at this juncture stating that there are two roles/actions that need to be taken. The first is finding the conceptual land use to be consistent with the General Plan and the second to recommend a Negative Declaration. He added that this is not an approval for a specific architectural design. Commissioner Hemandez asked what would happen if the Commission did not take those two actions. City Attorney William Seligmann advised that this item would still go before the Council. Chairperson Gibbons expressed concerns about the wording of the draft Resolution. Mr. Kirk Heinrichs advised that the finding must be made that the use of the property for parking and commercial use is consistent with the General Plan which will allow the Agency to move forward to acquire the land. Commissioner Gibbons asked if the entire parcel would be acquired. City Attorney William Seligmann advised that several parcels would be acquired. Commissioner Lowe recommended including the last office building on the block within the Master Development Plan. Commissioner Lindstrom proposed recommending support for this specific structure on this site. Mr. Kirk Heinrichs reminded the Commission that Council has already authorized this site for the location of the parking structure. Again he solicited comments on the conceptual design. City Attorney William Seligmann added that should the parcels receive Lot Line Adjustments, they would not come before the Planning Commission. Mr. Kirk Heinrichs added that Public Agencies are not subject to the Subdivision Map Act. Planning Commission Minutes of March 28, 2000 Page 12 Chairperson Gibbons: · Stated that the Planning Commission is being asked to comment on a public building. · Said that she finds it disappointing that the Commission is not being allowed the opportunity to follow the typical review and approval process as is done with private development. · Said that they are being asked to approve a conceptual design. · Said that this parking structure will impact the Downtown and adjacent residential neighborhoods. · Expressed concern about the two "bookends" of heavy brick material for this proposed structure. · Stated concern for the lack of a landscape plan. · Said that a "dead end" alley is being created. · Said that she does not see this building coming together as an integrated whole and that the proposed landscaping is simply an effort to camouflage the building. · Stated that the building is complex rather than having a continuity of simplicity, that it is massive rather than masterful. · Recommended that the Commission not support the design, saying that it is easier to change paper than concrete. · Said that this is the time to do it right. · Expressed support for having a parking garage, for the Environmental Impact Report and for the location of the parking structure. · Suggested that criteria should be reconsidered as to the appropriateness of what should be constructed there. Commissioner Lindstrom expressed support for differing opinions, saying that every person looks at a project through his or her own eyes. Recommended approval of the conceptual design. Commissioner Hernandez: · Stated that it is clear the downtown needs a parking structure and that this location has been determined to be appropriate. · Proposed that the Commission should find that this application is consistent with the General Plan. · Said that the project should be looked at as a whole. The Commission can comment on its wish to have future input to Council. · Expressed his personal thought that conceptual design of the parking structure is not offensive and has nice elements, is functional and looks like the parking garage that it is. Commissioner Jones: · Suggested a motion be made stating that this project is consistent with the General Plan and have the Redevelopment Agency go ahead and purchase the property. · Added that the Agency should also look at the cost for purchasing the last building on the block and/or add that site to the Master Development Plan. · Said that the development of the block should be looked at in its entirety, perhaps as a joint development project with a private developer. Planning Commission Minutes of March 28, 2000 Page 13 Chairperson Gibbons reiterated the recommendations thus far to support the move to purchase the property, recommend joint development of the entire block and to recommend that Council adopt a Negative Declaration. City Attorney William Seligmann suggested that the motion be considered in two parts. The first motion would be to approve the draft resolution finding the project is consistent with the City's General Plan and recommending the adoption of a Negative Declaration. The second motion will be to look at proceeding with the acquisition of the entire block and integrate the development of the entire block perhaps in conjunction with a private developer. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Jones seconded by Commissioner Lowe, the Planning Commission Adopted Resolution No. 3265, finding pursuant to Government Code Section 65402-C that the proposed acquisition of property within the second and third street blocks, between Campbell Avenue and Civic Center Drive, for use as a public parking structure and mixed-use commercial development is in conformance with the General Plan and recommended that Council grant a Negative Declaration, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Francois, Hernandez, Jones, Kearns, Lindstrom, Lowe None None Gibbons Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Jones, seconded by Commissioner Lowe, the Planning Commission took minute action recommending that the City Council look at proceeding with the acquisition of all the properties within the second and third street blocks, between Campbell Avenue and Civic Center Drive, and integrate the development of the entire block, perhaps in conjunction with a private developer, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Francois, Gibbons, Hernandez, Jones, Kearns, Lindstrom, Lowe NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Chairperson Gibbons called a brief recess at 9:35 p.m. Chairperson Gibbons reconvened the meeting at 9:40 p.m. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Jones, seconded by Commissioner Lowe, the Planning Commission took minute action recommending that the City Council not approve the conceptual parking structure design; that Council instruct staff to bring the final design back to the Planning Commission for review and recommendation, including color and material samples, landscape plans and signage such as is normally reviewed by the Planning Planning Commission Minutes of March 28, 2000 Page 14 Commission when processing a typical private development application, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Gibbons, Jones, Kearns, Lowe NOES: Francois, Hernandez, Lindstrom ABSENT: None BSTAIN: None City Attorney William Seligmann suggested that the Commission provide Council with what it finds objectionable with this proposal. Chairperson Gibbons replied that the Commission wants to see this project come through the normal development review process. REPORT OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR The written report of Ms. Sharon Fierro, Interim Community Development Director, was accepted as presented, with the added comment: · Advised that the project at 299 N. Harrison Avenue was denied by City Council after significant public testimony against it. Council directed staff to draft an interim ordinance that will impose a 45-day moratorium on development in the area. The only construction projects that will be allowed must meet the R-1 requirements. This is being done since the General Plan Task Force has been discussing the lowering of density in this area. The moratorium will be considered at the April 4th Council meeting. · Brought the recent San Jose Mercury New front-page article regarding the two recently- completed Campbell Habitat for Humanity houses to the attention of the Commission. · Mentioned that Home Depot has had a neighborhood meeting with local residents, which was very successful. Future meetings are planned to continue to build cooperation between Home Depot and the surrounding residents. Commissioner Lowe asked about the two letters included in their packets regarding the dental building under construction at 14419 S. Bascom Avenue. Ms. Sharon Fierro advised that this project is still under construction and final occupancy has not been obtained. The conditions of approval limit the site to two doctors/dentists. However, it appears that plans are being made for three dentists on site. Doctors from the adjacent properties are concerned about the impact this number of dentists would have on their own parking lot as this site has limited parking. Should the applicant wish to seek approval for more than two doctors/dentists, he would need to process a Modification of the approval with another hearing before the Planning Commission. Chairperson Gibbons asked about the request for a pedestrian crossing on Leigh Avenue made under Oral Request at a past Planning Commission meeting. Ms. Sharon Fierro advised that the Traffic Engineer has since evaluated the area and made the determination that a pedestrian crossing is not advised at this location. Planning Commission Minutes of March 28, 2000 Page 15 ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m. to the Planning Commission meeting of April 11, 2000, in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 70 North First Street, Campbell, California. ~~etk_~a~ ~ SUBMITTED BY: ~ APPROVED BY: ATTEST: Sharon Fierro, Secretary