Loading...
PC Min 06/13/2000CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 7:30 P.M. JUNE 13, 2000 CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY The Planning Commission meeting of June 13, 2000, was called to order at 7:30 p.m., in the Council Chambers, 70 North First Street, Campbell, California by Chairperson Gibbons, and the following proceedings were had, to wit: ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Chair: Vice Chair: Commissioner: Commissioner: Commissioner: Commissioner: Elizabeth Gibbons Mel Lindstrom Tom Francois Joseph D. Hemandez Susan A. Keams Dennis Lowe Commissioners Absent: Commissioner: Brad Jones Staff Present: Community Development Director: Associate Planner: Planner I: Reporting Secretary: Sharon Fierro Tim J. Haley Aki Irani Corinne A. Shinn APPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion: On motion of Commissioner Francois, seconded by Commissioner Lowe, the Planning Commission minutes of May 23, 2000, were approved. (6-0- 1; Commissioner Jones was absent.) COMMUNICATIONS. 1. Three items regarding Agenda Item No. 2. AGENDA MODIFICATIONS OR POSTPONEMENTS There were no agenda modifications or postponements. Planning Commission Minutes of June 13, 2000 Page 2 ORAL REQUESTS There were no oral requests. PUBLIC HEARING Chairperson Gibbons read Agenda Item No. 1 into the record. PLN2000-44 & PLN2000-73 Smith, J. Continued Public Hearing to consider the application of Mr. James Smith for approval of a Modification (PLN2000-44) to a previously approved Conditional Use Permit (UP 81-15) to allow a retail building and a Tree Removal Permit (PLN2000-73) to allow the removal of a walnut tree on property located at 3245 S. Winchester Boulevard in the C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. This project is Categorically Exempt. Planning Commission decision final in 10 days, unless appealed in writing to the City Clerk. (Continued from the Planning Commission meeting of May 23, 2000.) Mr. Tim J. Haley, Associate Planner, presented the staff report as follows: · Advised that the applicant is seeking a Modification to a Use Permit and a Tree Removal Permit to allow the remodel of an existing building. · In 1981, the Planning Commission approved the use of this residence for a day care. More recently, it had been used as a residence. The applicant is seeking to establish a retail use in the remodeled building. · Reminded the Commission that this applicant had come before them last fall seeking approval for a new commercial building at the rear portion of this site. The Commission approved the application. However, the rear neighbors appealed the approval to Council and Council overturned the Planning Commission's approval. · Stated that this application is for a remodel to the existing structure with parking to be provided at the rear, a building addition at the street frontage and at the rear of the building for a loading dock. · The proposed building would be 2,200 square feet. Eleven parking spaces will be provided which meets the 1 space per 200 square foot ratio of the Parking Ordinance. · This proposal is consistent with the General Plan and requires approval of a Conditional Use Permit under the C-2-S Zoning. · Advised that the buildings elevations are substantially renovated. · Informed that the removal of a large black walnut tree is required. The applicant will mitigate the removal by placing 24-inch box trees throughout the site as well as substantial screening to the rear to separate the site from the residential units behind it. · Said that there is an existing 5.5 foot masonry wall at the rear where a 6-foot wall is required. Staff is recommending an 8-foot masonry wall. · Staff recommends that the Commission adopt a Resolution approving this application. Commissioner Lindstrom presented the Site and Architectural Review Committee meeting as follows: Planning Commission Minutes of June 13, 2000 Page 3 · This project was reviewed by SARC on May 23, 2000. · Advised that the applicant has done an excellent job, working well with staff and SARC and that all issues have been resolved. · Stated that SARC supports approval of this application. Chairperson Gibbons opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 1. Mr. Bruce Johnson, Architect, 80 Alice Avenue: · Stated that Staff and SARC have done a lot of hard work. · Said that everything has been resolved. · Advised that he is available for any questions from the Commission. Commissioner Francois commended Mr. Johnson for his passion in his work, stating that it is a pleasure to work with him. Added that this is a well-tuned project. Commissioner Lindstrom asked what the proposed new building's square footage would have been. Mr. Bruce Johnson replied that the proposed new building included 3,400 square feet. Commissioner Lowe asked whether a tenant had been lined up for this building. Mr. Bruce Johnson advised that the owner's son would operate a steam cleaning supplies and equipment business. Commissioner Lowe asked about the deliveries to the back delivery door/dock. Mr. Bruce Johnson advised that he would have to defer to the owner but that he believed a fork lift would be involved. Mr. Richard Smith, 1093 Normandy Drive, Campbell. · Advised that Bobtail 18-wheel trucks up to 30 feet would make deliveries to the site. Commissioner Lowe asked about how trucks such as that would access the site. Mr. Richard Smith advised that the tracks back onto the site from Winchester Boulevard. Adding that this is the norm for all the businesses along the street. Commissioner Lowe asked if this is a permitted use in this area. Ms. Sharon Fierro said that the proposed use is a permitted use in the zone. Allowable operational hours are 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. planning Commission Minutes of June 13, 2000 Page 4 Mr. Richard Smith added that his business hours are from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Ms. Sharon Fierro added that she is aware that deliveries do occur as Mr. Smith described. Commissioner Lowe expressed his discomfort with the delivery method. Commissioner Lindstrom suggested that a Condition of Approval could be added that provides time references for deliveries. Mr. Gary Giraud, Representative of the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Association, 615 Louise Court: · Said that he applauds the Smiths and their architect for their work and for going ahead with this project. · Stated that he was opposed to the original request to construct a new building on this site. · Said that he had two issues requiring clarification, where garbage would be stored on site and whether noise could be conditioned so that there is nothing allowed past 10 p.m. Mr. Tim J. Haley advised that while not indicated on the plans, the garbage enclosure will be located near the service area at the rear of the building. The garbage enclosure will be screened. The allowable operational hours are listed in the Conditions of Approval as being 7 a.m. to 11 p.m. Commissioner Lowe stated that he was not interested in imposing any restrictions not imposed typically. Mr. Tim J. Haley stated that the hours he stated are the standard. Chairperson Gibbons closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 1. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Lindstrom, seconded by Commissioner Lowe, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 3283 approving a Modification (PLN2000-44) to a previously approved Conditional Use Permit (UP 81-15) to allow a retail building and a Tree Removal Permit (PLN2000- 73) to allow the removal of a walnut tree on property located at 3245 S. Winchester Boulevard, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Francois, Hernandez, Gibbons, Kearns, Lindstrom, Lowe NOES: None ABSENT: Jones ABSTAIN: None Chairperson Gibbons advised that this action is final, unless appealed in writing to the City Clerk within 10 days. Planning Commission Minutes of June 13, 2000 Page 5 Commissioner Francois advised the Chair that he would have to recuse himself from Agenda Item No. 2 as a family member is a party to this application. He left the dais to sit in the audience. Chairperson Gibbons read Agenda Item No. 2 into the record. 2. PLN2000-66 Francois, M. Continued Public Heating to consider the application of Mr. Matt Francois, on behalf of Dr. Dennis Wong, for approval of a Modification (PLN2000-66) to a previously-approved Site and Architectural Approval (S 98-24) to alter a Condition of Approval limiting the number of doctors/dentists using the site to two, on property located at 14419 $. Bascom Avenue in a PO (Professional Office) Zoning District. A Negative Declaration was previously approved for this project. Planning Commission decision final in 10 days, unless appealed in writing to the City Clerk. (Continued from the Planning Commission meeting of May 23, 2000.) Mr. Tim J. Haley, Associate Planner, presented the staff report as follows: · Advised that the applicants are seeking the modification of a Condition of Approval for a previously approved Site and Architectural Approval. · The original Site and Architectural Approval was granted on January 26, 1999, and allowed the construction of a new two-story office building with the provision of 12 parking spaces. · Condition of Approval No. 2 required that a covenant be filed limiting the number of doctors/dentists using the site to two. · The applicants are seeking to modify that restriction. · Staff's position is that the need for the limitation was made clear at the time of approval. Staff is not supportive of any changes to the Condition. · Advised that the requirement for six spaces per doctor is fairly consistent with other cities in the area. · Said that the building on this site consists of 4,930 square feet. Typically, a building of that size would require 21 spaces for general office use. For medical office use, the parking requirement is based upon the number of doctors. · Staff recommends denial. Chairperson Gibbons opened the Public Heating for Agenda Item No. 2. Mr. Ken Follmar, II, 14511 S. Bascom Avenue, Los Gatos. · Said that more parking is needed. · Agreed that while some medical procedures require more doctors, the limitations on this building were known in advance. · Stated that this building was overbuilt for the site. Planning Commission Minutes of June 13, 2000 Page 6 Mr. Matt Francois, Attomey, Cassidy, Shimko & Dawson. · Advised that they are here seeking clarification about an ambiguous Condition of Approval. · Stated that Dr. Walker is both a physician and a dentist who performs complex surgeries which require an anesthesiologist and assisting physician. · Said that Dr. Walker's practice is in conformance with the six parking spaces allotted to it. · Stated that Dr. Walker should be treated no differently than any other physician. · Proposed that the covenant be modified and nan'owed. · Stated that he is willing to work with staff to modify the covenant language in a way that pleases the City and allows Dr. Walker's practice. Commissioner Lindstrom clarified that Mr. Francois is seeking is to modify the limitation on the number of doctors permitted in this building. Mr. Matt Francois said that what he is trying to convey is that there is no excess parking on the part of Dr. Walker's practice. Ms. Sharon Fierro clarified that this is a two-story building. Dr. Wong, a dentist, is occupying the second floor. Dr. Walker is occupying the first floor, with Dr. Loitz and an anesthesiologist assisting as needed. Dr. Walker cannot guarantee that there is no overlap. Dr. Leigh Walker, 14419 S. Bascom Avenue: · Stated that he is a sole practitioner, occupying the first floor of the building. · Advised that he hired an architect to create a state-of-the-art facility. · Said that he trained for 13 years following college to prepare for his current specialty. · The City received a complaint when he sent a notice advising the start of his practice in this location. · Said that he has been in this location now for five weeks. Advised that he has maintained a parking log since he started and there has not been one violation. Stated that he is willing to continue to maintain the parking log. · Expressed his understanding of his neighbors' concerns. · Stated that he is a licensed physician in California and requires the assistance of an assisting physician and anesthesiologist one or two times per month to perform one or two surgeries. Commissioner Hemandez sought clarification. Dr. Walker states that he is a sole practitioner with assisting physicians a couple of times each month but that the announcement for his new practice lists a partnership/joint practice. Dr. Leigh Walker replied that it is his practice. He spent $225,000 in improvements. He is associated with Dr. Loitz as a way of introducing himself into the community, a common practice. Commissioner Hemandez stated that this is a way of trading off on the good will of an experienced doctor. Planning Commission Minutes of June 13, 2000 Page 7 Commissioner Keams stated that at the time of original approval for this new building, the applicant stated that there was no problem with the limitations on the number of doctors. Dr. Leigh Walker stated that he believes his practice is a sole practice. All he is asking for is a clarification. Commissioner Hemandez asked if Dr. Loitz sees only the same patients as Dr. Walker, at the same time? Dr. Leigh Walker: · Stated that there are just one or two patients the entire day for the entire staff. · Advised that he is seeking JCHO accreditation. Under this accreditation, it is unethical to operate in more than one room at a time. · Said that his whole office is geared to treat one patient at a time. It sometimes takes six to eight hours for one patient. Chairperson Gibbons asked if Dr. Loitz practices elsewhere. Dr. Leigh Walker replied that Dr. Loitz does practice elsewhere, this is not his primary location. Chairperson Gibbons asked how many days Dr. Loitz has been working at this location in the five weeks since the practice opened. Dr. Leigh Walker advised that Dr. Loitz has been there every day during the transition. Dr. Loitz is helping to start up this practice, advising in all matters including how to set up the books. Chairperson Gibbons asked if Dr. Loitz has regular office hours at this location. Dr. Leigh Walker stated that Dr. Loitz has not seen patients except with him. Commissioner Hernandez asked Dr. Walker how long Dr. Loitz would be associated with the practice in this way. Dr. Leigh Walker replied about six months and only on special occasions thereafter. Dr. Loitz has no long-term commitment to this practice. Commissioner Lowe commended Dr. Walker for starting his new practice in Campbell. Asked if Dr. Walker was aware of the covenant when establishing his practice at this location. Dr. Leigh Walker replied that he was not aware of the covenant at that time. Chairperson Gibbons advised that the Dr. Walker's business license approval form clearly stated the limit of two doctors for the building. Planning Commission Minutes of June 13, 2000 Page 8 Dr. Paul Beaupre, 16178 Greenwood Road, Monte Sereno. Advised that he is an anesthesiologist. · Stated that he has been in the community for 15 years and thanked the Commission for its time. · Stated that the issue is that it is more cost effective to open an office operating room. · Said that Dr. Walker's facility will retain the highest accreditation possible. · This practice has one patient for one surgery at a time. No other patients are treated. The focus is on one patient. Said that the State of California sets standards for the number of patients at a time. · Advised that he does not bring support staff with him as Dr. Walker's office staff is trained to assist should emergencies arise. · Reiterated that the entire office staff is focused on one patient. Commissioner Lindstrom asked for clarification on the accreditation mentioned. Dr. Paul Beaupre said that the accreditation is JCHO (Joint Commission of Hospitals) and has the strictest of standards. Commissioner Lowe asked why such extensive facial surgery is not conducted within a hospital. Dr. Paul Beaupre replied that such surgeries can be done safely out of traditional hospitals. Insurance companies insist upon it. Dr. Stinson Humphrey, 15715 Gum Tree Lane, Los Gatos. · Advised that he has practiced 20 years as an oral surgeon and is now retired. · Added that it is difficult to get people into hospitals in these days of managed care. Dr. Ken Follmar, 20770 Montalvo Lane, Saratoga. · Advised that he is a retired oral surgeon. · Said that he owns the building to the south of Dr. Wong's building. His building has 36 spaces and all spaces on his site are used. · Expressed fear that the overflow of parking needed by Dr. Wong and Dr. Walker will end up on his lot. · Advised that Dr. Wong has added a hygienist with her own patient load. · Said that Dr. Wong knew of the restriction to two doctors for his new building. This information should have been shared with Dr. Walker. · Said that Dr. Walker's mailed announcement stated a partnership "in our new office at 14419 S. Bascom Avenue." · Additionally, the stationary from the office lists both Dr. Walker and Dr. Loitz. Mr. Rudi Herz, 1888 White Oaks Road. · Advised that he is a past president of the local homeowners' association. Planning Commission Minutes of June 13, 2000 Page 9 · Stated that White Oaks Road is an "endangered" residential neighborhood. There are many auto repair facilities at one end and several dental buildings. · Said that they have had many complaints about the dentists and none about the auto repair. · Advised that the dentists ask their employees to park on the street so that patients can park in their lots. Added that he cannot prove this claim. However, on weekdays, street parking on White Oaks Road is loaded and on weekends there is none. · Added that this overflow parking on White Oaks is inconvenient when guests can't park in front of residents' homes. · Stated that the parking requirements for dentists are improperly set. Ms. Jolie Houston, Attorney, Berliner, Cohen, 10 Almaden Boulevard, 11th Floor, San Jose. · Stated that she submitted a letter earlier which is included in the staff report. · Asked to bring back the discussion to the land use issue, the covenant. · Said that this project was approved with the condition that the number of doctors be limited to two. · The Parking Ordinance requires the provision of six spaces for each doctor. · Advised that one doctor has already admitted to not literally adhering to the number of doctors fight now. · Said that the Zoning Code cannot be changed by modifying a covenant. Added that the covenant is confusing and unenforceable. · Stated that she is available for questions. · Said that with the adoption of a Negative Declaration, required under CEQA, parking was seen as an impact which was mitigated by limiting the number of doctors on the site. Ms. Deborah Follmar, 15261 Sobey Road, Saratoga. · Advised that while the Wong building was under construction, she was in charge of managing her own adjacent property. Added that she had to chase construction workers building the Wong building off of her property on a number of occasions during the construction phase and was rudely treated. Said that posting signs on her property restricting parking did not solve the problem. Said that it appears that Dr. Walker is a great physician with a great future but that he picked the wrong building. Dr. Rick Noodleman, 3803 S. Bascom Avenue, Campbell. · Advised that he owns the building adjacent to the Wong building on the north side. · Said that he welcomes Dr. Wong and Dr. Walker to the community and wishes them success. · Stated that nine years ago, he and his partners built their building and added underground parking, which was very expensive, to meet the parking needs for their practice. · Expressed concern that, should the parking lot be full at the Wong building, the overflow will end up in their parking lot. More parking is required. Commissioner Keams asked Dr. Noodleman if he had any suggestions on how to procure more parking. Planning Commission Minutes of June 13, 2000 Page 10 Dr. Rick Noodleman replied that perhaps offsite parking with shuttle service. Added that he did not know what was available. Chairperson Gibbons asked if the adjacent properties are in compliance as far as parking requirements are concerned. Ms. Sharon Fierro, Community Development Director, replied that she is not positive as no research has been done recently but that no complaints have been made to the City. Dr. Greg Loitz, 33 Palma, La Selva Beach. · Advised that Dr. Walker has come to the community to provide a valuable service. Walker purchased his practice. · Stated that his role is to introduce Dr. Walker and back out of the practice. · Stated that he has served on accreditation committees for two local centers. Dr. · Said that he is aware the Dr. Noodleman is affiliated with 35 anesthesiologists in his own practice. · Stated that he believes Dr. Walker will meet the covenant requirements. Chairperson Gibbons closed the Public Heating for Agenda Item No. 2. Commissioner Lowe stated that he had expressed concern about the parking for this site at the original hearing held to approve this building. He advised that he voted against the approval for the building. Added that he will vote against any changes to the covenant language now. Commissioner Hemandez asked the City Attorney for direction and whether the Commission could modify this approval. Mr. William Seligmann, City Attorney, advised that the Commission has the general authority to modify its approvals. Commissioner Hemandez said that the condition restricting the number of doctors for this building has been imposed for a reason. While Dr. Walker's practice is not a high volume one, the condition runs with the land not with Dr. Walker. The Commission must reconcile Dr. Walker's unique practice with the potential future occupants of the site. Chairperson Gibbons: · Stated that she concurred. · Added that the minutes of the original meeting are included in the packet. · Said that the zoning stipulated the amount of parking required and that a lengthy discussion of parking concerns took place. · Said that tonight's discussion is down to two issues. What is a doctor and the specifics of this particular medical practice. Planning Commission Minutes of June 13, 2000 Page 11 · Said that she had issues with two practicing physicians despite the covenant. Commissioner Hernandez asked if Chairperson Gibbons had concerns about two doctors even if for just one patient. Chairperson Gibbons replied yes. Commissioner Keams stated that she concurred with Chairperson Gibbons and Commissioner Hemandez. Added that she didn't want to stand in the way of this doctor's practice but she is struggling with the parking issue. This is a tough decision. Commissioner Lindstrom: Reminded that Dr. Wong's practice also has a hygienist in addition to Dr. Wong. · Said that parking is an issue but if only once a month it may not be such a problem. · Said that Dr. Walker has done a good job logging the parking habits of his visitors and that no violations of parking have occurred to this point. Chairperson Gibbons, looking at page 11 of Dr. Walker's log, stated that within a half hour period there were five patients, the doctor and two staff members. This is just one example. Commissioner Lindstrom suggested leaving the covenant the same. Commissioner Lowe said that when the Commission originally considered this project there was extensive discussion and "here we are back at the table again." Commissioner Lindstrom said that the Commission would have to stay with two primary doctors. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Lowe, seconded by Commissioner Lindstrom, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 3284 denying a request for a Modification (PLN2000-66) to a previously-approved Site and Architectural Approval (S 98-24) to alter a Condition of Approval, limiting the number of doctors/dentists using the site to two, on property located at 14419 S. Bascom Avenue, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Hernandez, Gibbons, Kearns, Lindstrom, Lowe NOES: None ABSENT: Jones ABSTAIN: Francois Chairperson Gibbons advised that this decision is final unless appealed in writing to the City Clerk within 10 days. Commissioner Francois returned to the dais at following completion of Agenda Item No. 2. Planning Commission Minutes of June 13, 2000 Page 12 Chairperson Gibbons read Agenda Item No. 3 into the record. 3. PLN2000-67 Chao, G. Public Hearing to consider the application of Mr. Gary Chao for a Site and Architectural Approval (PLN2000-67) to allow the construction of a new single-family residence on property located at 1145 S. San Tomas Aquino Road in an R-l-9 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District. This project is Categorically Exempt. Planning Commission decision final in 10 days, unless appealed in writing to the City Clerk. Ms. Aki Irani, Planner I, presented the staff report as follows: Advised that revised findings have been distributed this evening for this project. · Said that the project site is located behind the Rolling Hills Shopping Center. · The project site is zoned R-l-9 (Single Family Residential) and includes 7,600 square feet which is legal, non-conforming. · The proposal is consistent with the General Plan. · The applicants propose to construct a 2,984 square foot, two-story single family residence with a 446 square foot, two-car garage. · No trees will be removed and the applicants will plant an additional three trees. · The applicants will be required to participate in future street improvements. · Staff is supportive of this project and recommends approval. Commissioner Lowe asked if there are any Fire Department concerns. Ms. Aki Irani advised that there are no concerns at this time. Chairperson Gibbons added that this is a landlocked parcel with no public road in front of it but rather access by way of an easement. Commissioner Lowe asked if there were other such parcels. Ms. Aki Irani replied that there are six or seven altogether on this street. When the properties are redeveloped, improvements will be installed. Commissioner Lindstrom advised that this applicant will be dedicating 5 feet for the future improvements. Commissioner Lowe asked if this dedication would be setting the standard. Ms. Aki Irani advised that this property is the first to be improved and would be setting the standard for the required dedication. She added that the easement is 30 feet wide at this time but Planning Commission Minutes of June 13, 2000 Page 13 that 20 feet of that width is actually privately owned property of the Rolling Hills Shopping Center. Ms. Sharon Fierro added that nothing is shown on the Tax Assessor's map and that that 20 feet appears to be private property with the fencing inside the property by 20 feet. Added that the public improvements are not been dedicated or improved at this time. When it is improved, it will be with rolled curbs as the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan calls for no curbs, gutters and sidewalks for new streets. Commissioner Lindstrom presented the Site and Architectural Review Committee meeting as follows: · This project was reviewed by SARC on May 23, 2000. · Advised that the octagon window was lowered and centered. · SARC is supportive of this project. Chairperson Gibbons opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 3. Mr. Gary Chao, 1145 S. San Tomas Aquino Road. · Expressed that he was happy to provide a more simple project to the Commission than the preceding two from this evening's agenda. · Said that staff did a great job summarizing the project and that he has worked hard with staff and the architectural advisor. Commissioner Lowe asked if Mr. Chao would occupy this home. Mr. Gary Chao replied that he would be occupying the new home along with his family. Chairperson Gibbons closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 3. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Lindstrom, seconded by Commissioner Hernandez, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 3285 granting a Site and Architectural Approval (PLN2000-51) to allow the construction of a new single-family residence on property located at 1145 S. San Tomas Aquino Road, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Francois, Hernandez, Gibbons, Kearns, Lindstrom, Lowe NOES: None ABSENT: Jones ABSTAIN: None Chairperson Gibbons advised that this approval is final unless appealed in writing to the City Clerk within 10 days. Commissioner Lindstrom took a moment to congratulate Commissioner Francois who is the new grandfather to twins. Presented him with a cigar. Planning Commission Minutes of June 13, 2000 Page 14 REPORT OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR The written report of Ms. Sharon Fierro, Community Development Director, was accepted as presented, with the added comments: · Advised that the Council adopted the operational budget for the next fiscal year. · Said that the Council upheld the Planning Commission's approval for E1 Patio and agreed to have the City complete the improvements of the cul-de-sac. The cost for the improvements will be collected from Mr. Hardy at the time that he sells or develops his property in the future. · Advised that the City is working with Habitat for Humanity to develop the property at W. Campbell and Victor Avenues. · Informed that the next meeting will include a review of the landscaping plan for the Vasona Technology Park. · Advised that Chairperson Gibbons would provide an update of the General Plan Update at the next Planning Commission meeting. · Announced that Planner Aki Irani was leaving the City of Campbell to join the staff at Union City as Associate Planner. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m. to the Planning Commission meeting of June 27, 2000, in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 70 North First Street, Campbell, California. SUBMITTED BY: C°~e A. Shinn, ~eecording Secretary APPROVED BY: {"'~?-~ ~/~/"'~. ~x~ }~l~zabe~ Gibbons, Chair ATTEST: Sharon Fierro, Secretary