Street ImprovementsENCROACHMET ERMIT ISSUANCE CHECK LIST (INTE] L USE ONLY)
City of Campbell Encroachment Permit No. ENC IXQtIS OOCA- l
Department of Public Works Tract No.
Address: kl—S5r �h� ` ( sc- c)
ITEMS REQUIRED FOR PERMIT APPLICATION:
Encroachment Permit Application complete, with applicant signature and date (fi-ont and back) j
2 Pen -nit Application Fee paid $ - Receipt Number & Dated -3 L' 11$ f l 3
J 24�423
Plan Check Deposit Paid (2% of Engi/n�eer's Estimate, $500 min) $ 355 •0 Q Receipt Number
V Grading Plan Review Fee paid $ 156 0 - Receipt Number & Date 112)
/ City Engineer's Estimate Completed and Submitted
�6.y Four (4) Sets of Street Improvement Plans
7. Four (4) Sets of Grading and Drainage Plans J�
—8. twl Check Lists (Grading and Drainage, Street Improvem2 �Z3 ent)
[ �� 11 I
Lir�.v �v
9. Plan Check& Inspection Fee: Engineer's Estimate (EE) = $ if EE is <$250,000, then fee is 14% of EE.
If EE >_ $250,000, fee is Actual Cost + 20%. $35,0001,111111mum deposit. ��P� G1 �� Receipt No. & Date �� tj �I 4
Amount $
10 Security for Faithful Perforinance.x.W Labor and Materials, 100% each of ng ;sEstt'mate, supplied or paid�i / U
Amount $ 1- * 0 ` 00 "nn 0005�-IWeceipt No. & Date ' lip
f`� r cro/ I y
11. Security or Monumentation Amount $ Receipt No. & Date��
12. ' Construction Emergency Cash Deposit: 4% of Enginee -'s tun te. ($500 n 'nii um $10,000 maximum)
/ Amount - Receipt No. & Date: 6
'
13. V Storm Drainage Area Fee Amount $ � 1 aReceipt No. & Date
14. Street Improvement Agreement signed and notarized (proof of ownership submitted)
15. Right of Way Documents Completed and Fees Paid.
16. All other Public Works requirements listed in the Conditions of Approval of the development.
17. • / Other Fees, Payments, Deposit
18 `✓ SWPPP+NOI 1
21 �_ Geotech Letter 22.
9. -
s
Amount $ ReR ipt No. & Date
C3 Certification 20. Covenant Agreement
Storm Water Management Plane ?CJ
i6A
ITEMS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PERMIT:
Contractor's signature added to the permit application (front and back)
Contractor's City of Campbell Business License 9
Worker's Compensation Insurance Infonnation Sheet received from Contractor.
Certificate of Insurance with Additional Insured's Endorsement received from Applicant or Contractor.
One mylar set and six (6) or less sets of off -site plans signed by engineer, stamped APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION.
_Contractor, _Inspector _PW Superintendent (Service Center)
EP File _LD File _Signals & Lighting Supervisor (Service Center)
` 28. Permit signed by City Engineer.
29. INITIATE CHECK REQUEST FOR PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT REFUND
WHEN ALL OF THE ABOVE ITEMS ARE COMPLETE, PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED.
Issuer: Initial aid date aid file with permit
J:\FORMS\Templates\Land Development\Street Improvements\Encroachment Permit Issuance Checldist.doc (Rev. 07/11)
e
M.,
Ra +++s
RCVS BY: Qmlm 010094 3
mmblSmISlOF U
S+«B DATE:oR1-l3
REGISTER DATE: Gd 13 TIME: b b2
DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
OmamR&FRa§F 1pGm
m# G:mS±S
RE +POSIT -!R q.70.G
PAS 3
dm£2AD FILING «.Dn,dm t
m# S:
gm&mg& FILING g370.00
m# 1D:135SANmU:mdm
--------
TOTAL DUE: g%Gm
CHECK PAID: $12,950.00
. CHECK NO: m # m
TENDERED: 112,950.0c.
CHANGE;
« o§
m
•
0 Print Form
CITY OF CAMPBELL
DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
70 North First Street
Campbell, CA 95008
Ph. (408) 866-2150
Fx. (408) 376-0958
ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
(for working within the public
right-of-way)
Issued
Permit Expiration Date
Permit No 0 —tS00(a�p
X-Ref. File
Application Date _A_- ° w 2 , L4,
Application Expiration Date
APN 403-02-039
APPLICATION - Application is hereby made for a Public Works Permit in accordance with Campbell Municipal Code, Section 11.04. (Application expires in six
(6) months if the permit is not issued. Application Fee is non-refundable.)
A. Work Address orTract No.: 125 South San Tomas Aquino Road / Tract No. 10182
Utility Trench Location:
B. Nature of work: 125 Unit Single Family Home Development on 27 Lot Subdivision
C. Attach four (4) copies of an engineered plan showing the location and extent of the work, and four (4) copies of the preliminary Engineer's
Estimate of work. The plans shall show the relation of the proposed work to existing surface and underground improvements. When approved
by the City Engineer, said plan becomes a part of this permit.
D. All work shall conform to the City of Campbell Standard Specifications and Details for Public Works Construction; the General Permit Conditions
listed on the reverse side; and the Special Provisions for this permit, listed below. Failure to abide by these conditions and provisions may result
in job shutdown and/or forfeiture of Faithful Performance Sureties and cash deposits. (See General Permit Conditions land 2.)
E. The Contractor must have this permit and approved plans at the site and must notify the Public Works Department at least two days before
starting work. Notice must be given to Public Works at least 24 hours before restarting any work.
Name of Applicant: JStuart Wagner (Taylor Morrison)
Telephone: 1(925) 364-8000
Address: 4309 Hacienda Drive, Suite 450 Pleasanton, CA 94588
E-Mail Address: swagner@taylormorrison.com 24-HOUR EMERGENCY PHONE NUMBER: (510) 363-1774
Is this work being done by the property owners at their own residence? r. YES r NO
The Applicant/Permittee hereby agrees by affixing their signature to this permit to hold the City of Campbell, its officers, agents, and employees free, safe
and harmless from any claim or demand for damages resulting from the work covered by this permit.
The Applicant/Permittee hereby acknowledges that they have read and understand both the front and back of this permit, and they will inform their
contractor(s) of the information. Applicant is advised that upon issuance of this permit, property owner, or property owner's successors, shall be
responsible for any and all damages arising out of the condition of any {private improvements in the public right-of-way. I 1
Accepted:
SrUAX-r \NA&14tf-
(Applicant Permittee) (sign) o Date 2 h-A 1) I
(Contractor) (Print Name) Date
SPECIAL PROVISIONS:
1. Street shall not be open cut for underground installations. Minimum cuts may be allowed for connections or exploration holes. Such cuts may be
specifically approved by the Inspector prior to cutting.
2. Pavement may be cut for underground installations and must be restored in accordance with the Standard Details Trench Restoration Method
"A", unless otherwise approved by the Engineer.
3. Work to be staked by a licensed Land Surveyor or Civil Engineer and two (2) copies of the cut sheets sent to the Public Works Department
before starting work.
4. Per Section 4215 of the Government Code this permit is not valid for excavations until Underground Service Alert (USA) has been notified and
the inquiry identification number has been entered hereon. USA Phone: 1-800-227-2600. USA TICKET NO.
5. Prior to any work, the property owner shall execute an Agreement for Private Improvements in the Public Right -of -Way, which shall be recorded.
6. Public Notification Requirements:
FJ
SEE PUBLIC WORKS FEE SCHEDULE FOR CURRENT FEES AMOUNT RECEIPT NO.
PERMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 37D 2- 4-1 Z a
PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT $ 556 Z 82- �,
SECURITY FOR FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE/LABOR & MATERIALS $ b 16 0 CWl^ cL4D elo
CONSTRUCTION CASH DEPOSIT $ 3.qQ0 . 0 0 Q °S)I C)a-O
PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION FEE $ 2, L- IS5D . 0 Q 2 I q�-O
EMERGENCY PERMIT FEE $
APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE
For City Engineer Date
Permit Expires 12 Months After Date of Issuance
ITIX 12T--,
J
1
vt�yj_
E1..
` s
Q y0
rr
UkCHAO"
SUBMIT TO:
C1it� G'-1 C,2IiT DD--i1
WASTE
MANAGEMENT
PLAINT
City of Campbell
Public Works Dept.
70 N. First St.
Campbell, CA 95008
Mon. — Fri. 8:00 am - 5:00 pm
INFORMATION AND SUPPORT:
Public Works Dept. - 408 866 2150
I
I
i
Permit No.
WMP REQUIRED BECAUSE PROJECT IS A
❑ Demolition >_ 500 Sq. Ft.
❑ Construction/Remodel >- $250,000
❑ Construction/Remodel > 2000 sq. ft.
This Waste Management Plan (WMP) must be completed and approved to obtain a building permit.
Separate WMPs must be completed for demolition and construction at the some site unless the
Building Department requires only one permit.
Step 1: PROJECT INFORMATION - FILL OUT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION
Applicant's Name: " rAYi-o k cZo S•Tu A r- -7- WA 6 W v le -
Contact Phone Number: C%l�� -3&q- `°000 Fax Number: Cgts' 9-7'3'-1>5'
Check one: ❑ Owner ❑ Architect ❑ Builder X Owner/Builder ❑ Other
h �-/3 s a,, --e"i , fries _
Contractor: ►Ayc-uz wvae,se � �eFvi ce contact Phone Number: (S15� 36�( ,co
Project Type: ❑ New ❑ Remodel ❑ Addition [� Demolition
Project Square Footage: `3 2 , 7, i
Project Description: VC—o` Pr46 e C- aIs,`p;;JLUCA-+-'t4t:'
Estimated Completion Date: I o / rs` ; 3 " T Ili- s.
S �,r
LFV v 7
Step 2: WASTE MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS
REQUIREMENTS: You are required to recycle or re -use 507o of all construction and demolition debris.
I understand that I am required by the City of Campbell Municipal Code Section 6.12 to salvage,
reuse, or recycle a minimum of 50% of all construction and demolition debris (C&D)'. 5 W.
(Initial)
Document in Windows Internet Explorer
m! _ al Shall JUni.• :J;= .;i\ imDr!s0llmei ?rl6 O;. iij ! I: U T
fine of UD TO S I ,00 1, or both. In addition, a stop order on the job or a delay Of final approvai mat`
occur. (initial)
At the completion of this project, or more frequently if required, all receipts or other equivalent
documentation from salvage,"recycling.and waste facilities will be provided to the City of. Campbell
Public Works Department and I understand that I may not be issued my final inspection unless all
receipts and documentation are submitted to the City of Campbell Public Works Department.
15-N,J .. (Initial)
Step 3: RECYCLING CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS = ANSWER THE QUESTIONS
BELOW .
SALVAGE AND REUSE:
What materials will be salvaged? M ET -A
Salvage Company (if applicable):
What materials will be reused on site? Cp N AF Te AGjjrl;-�&,`ram „y,: l=
How will this be documented?
MATERIAL TRANSPORTATION:
Will you be using a hauling company.or hauling the material yourself? (Check one)
❑ West Valley Collection & Recycling Co. (WVCR)* K Self Haul
* Permit Applicant is required to contact WVCR (408-283-9250) to request construction and
demolition debris box service.
All original receipts, weight tags and documentation for salvage, recycling, and disposal must be
submitted:
❑ On Completion of project ❑ Other
DPW Approval: uare:
Please complete this section and have' it approved by the Public Works Department no later than 30
days after completion of the demolition or construction project.
This section must be completed and signed, and all original receipts or other supporting
documentation must be attached in order to receive final project approval.
❑ All original receipts or equivalent documentation for salvage, recycling, and disposal are hereby
attached.
❑ This project has recycled at least 50% of all construction and demolition debrriis enerated.
Applicant: Date: / /3
DPW Approval:
Document in Windows Internet Explorer
=�-OF.CAMneF
MEMORANDUM City of Campbell
z Public Works Department
OPcHna"
To: Alex Mordwinow, Public Works Superintendent Date: June 25, 2013
David Mooso, Signals and Lighting Supervisor
From: Doris C. Quai Hoi, Assistant Engineer
_ (N4
Subject: New Street Trees and Street Lighting with Proposed Development — 125 S
San Tomas Aquino Road
I have attached the plans for.the proposed development at 125 S San Tomas Aquino
Road at the corner of San Tomas Aquino Road and Bucknall Avenue. We are currently
at the plan check stage with this project. The City will be requiring the developer to
install new park strip with street trees and street lights and sidewalk along the Bucknall
and San Tomas Aquino Road frontage of this development.
Please address the following:
1. Evaluate whether any existing street trees require removal. Identify them
on the plans
2. State the size, quantity, species and location of all new street trees.
3. .Identify on the plans, locations of any new street lights. Specify features of
the Type 15 street lights:
i. ❑ 55 Watt fixture with a 35 Watt lamp
ii. ❑ 55 Watt fixture and lamp
iii. ❑ 8' arm
iv. ❑12' arm
v. ❑ HPS-
vi. ❑ LPS
Please return the plans with your mark ups. Return information by July 3rd.
Call me at ext. 2157 if you need any additional information. Thanks for your help.
Attachment: Street Improvement Plans
J:\LandDev\Plan Check Comments\STAR S 125\Memo to Signals and Alex 2013 June 24th.DOC
Dbris Quai Hoi
From: Stieber, Brandon [bstieber@ruthandgoing.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2013 4:30 PM
To: Doris Quai Hoi
Subject: 125 San Tomas Aquino - Utility Vaults Along Frontage
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Red
Attachments: San Tomas Aquino —Utility Vaults.pdf; Existing Utility Vaults.pdf; Proposed Utility Vault_Sidewalk.pdf; Detail 2_SW Widening.pdf
9/9/2013
m
0
N
CN
..,'_"T"%�: d F"�"'i `T.,'.'--7: . ': "�' ^-- ",- , --air*•.-..
Doris„
I have two separate questions for you regarding the utility vaults along the frontage of 125 San Tomas Aquino Road.
1) See attached sketch for proposed location of utility vaults given to us by the joint trench consultant as part of the undergrounding of the overhead utilities. None of these proposed vaults will
be in the public sidewalk as we have adjusted the proposed sidewalk to meander around the two large vaults that would otherwise encroach Into the sidewalk. We've followed the City standard
detail (Detail 2, see attached) to avoid these proposed vaults, also see attached sketches. Does this sidewalk layout work for you with the proposed vault locations?
2) There are two large existing utility vaults that currently lie within the public sidewalk at the northeast end of the site (see 3 attached photos for reference). We currently have these vaults called
out to remain and for them to be adjusted to finished grade. We want to make sure that we can proceed with the design of leaving these vaults in place.
We've done some research and relocating these vaults would have a huge impact on not only the project but also the surrounding neighborhood. These vaults are connected to a loop system,
which means the existing conduits would have to be intercepted and rerouted to the new vault locations, the trenches re -compacted, and the hardscape replaced. We would have to find another
location for these large vaults, which would require tearing up quite a large section of sidewalk and asphalt. This would cost roughly $60,000 to $65,000 for each vault (PG&E and phone), for a
total cost of between $120,000 and $130,000. The relocation would require a shut down and service would be disrupted to the neighbors. As this point in time, it would take ourjoint trench
consultant another 4-5 months to get the relocation designed and approved by PG&E.
So as you can see, this is a major impact if we have to relocate these existing vaults. We're hoping that we can just leave them in their existing condition as we have specified on our plans. We
have made sure to keep the proposed utility vaults clear of the public sidewalk, but his is an existing condition and not related to our undergrounding work or any of our public street
improvements along the frontage.
Please take a look at the attached documents and let me know if what we are showing is acceptable. I look forward to working out a solution with you.
Thank you,
Brandon Stieber, P.E.
Design Engineer
Ruth and Going, Inc.
2216 The Alameda
Santa Clara, CA 95050
Main: (408) 236-2400
Direct: (408) 236-2407
This message may contain confidential and privileged Infoi-i—Lion. If you are nol. Lhe inf.ended recipien L, disclosure is prohibited. Please delete and notify sender by reply e-snail.
Thank you.
*** e5afe 3 scanned this email for malicious content ***
*** IMPORTANT: Do not open attachments from unrecognized senders *"*
9/9/2013
R+G
Job No. 09-078Br,-
v
��
Ruth and Going, Inc.
April 18, 2013
k, 1& yam
F
Engineering
Ed Arangoij
Planning
City of Campbell — Public Works Department
y ,
70 North First Street
Campbell, CA 95008
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 26460
Re: 125 South San Tomas Aquino Road
San Jose
1" Submittal — Grading Plans, Public Street Improvement Plans, and Final Map
CA 95159-6460
Ed, 2216 The Alameda
Santa Clara
CA 95050
Please see attached: Ph: (408) 236-2400
Fax: (408) 236-2410
• Utility Clearance Letters from Public Utilities
• Two (2) copies of the Preliminary Title Report
• Two (2) copies of Grant Deed Document No. 21981258
• Two (2) copies of all referenced maps and docs used to prepare Tract Map
• Map Plan Check (check was combined with Grading Plan fee and
Encroachment Permit Fee, Check #36000-00027486 )
• Four (4) sets of Tract Map No. 10182
• Check list for Tract Map
• Two (2) copies of Closure/ Area Calculations
• Two (2) copies of Geotechnical Report
• Encroachment Permit Application complete and signed
• Permit Application Fee Check (combined with Final Map fee and Grading Plan
fee, Check #36000-00027486)
• Four (4) copies of City Engineer's Estimate Completed
• Plan Check Deposit (2% of Engineer's Estimate), receipt number 36000-
00027588
• Four (4) Sets of Street Improvement Plans
• Check List for Street Improvement Plans
• Four (4) sets of Grading and Drainage Plans
• Grading Plan Review Fee (combined with Final Map fee and Grading Plan fee,
Check #36000-00027486)
• Check List for On -site Grading and Drainage
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at (408) 236-2407.
Very truly yours,
9A _A7
Brandon Stieber, P.E.
CITY OF CAMPBELL Print Form .
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
70 North First Street, Campbell, CA 95008
Ph. (408) 866-2150; Fx. (408) 376-0958
CHECKLIST FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS,
APPLICATION NO(S):
ADDRESS: 125 South San Tomas Aquino Road
Instructions: This checklist provides advance notification to applicants of the City of Campbell's final street improvement plans and "'U!)
submittal requirements. Using this checklist will expedite your application through the City's review process.
Prior to submitting a final street improvement plan list to the City Engineer, please place an "X" in the space to the right of each item below to
indicate you have complied with, or place "N/A" to indicate that the particular item doesn not apply. Review applicable sections, which are
referenced in parentheses, before checking off each item.
SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF ENGINEER OF WORK
I HEREBY DECLARE THAT I AM THE ENGINEER OF WORK FOR THIS PROJECT, THAT I HAVE EXERCISED RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OVER THE DESIGN
OF THE PROJECT, AND COMPLETION OF THIS CHECKLIST, AS DEFINED IN SECTION 6703 OF THE BUSINESS AND PROFESSION CODE, AND THAT
THE DESIGN IS CONSISTENT WITH CURRENT STANDARDS.
Q�rjFESS
C. S/yg1F
Signature Date
Printed Name: Michael C. Sheehy I No. c mn a
- Exp. 3-31
RCE #: 29693 r1'
�\�
Expiration Date: 03-31-15 FC�, (SEAL)
ITEMS COMPLY NOT APPLY CITY COMMENTS
I. GENERAL
OK
1. City standard off -site title sheet with applicable notes. X �
2. 24"X36" sheet size used, including City Standard OK
borders and Blueprint for a Clean Bay Plan Sheet.
OK
3. Title Block/Scale/North Arrow Shown.
4. Plans capable of microfilm reproductions - minimum rl OK
1/8 inch lettering.
5. Engineer's name, number, expiration date and F?�—j OK
signature included on all sheets.
6. Vicinity Map shown (must be microfilmable). FX—j OK
7. Sheet Index and key map included for 3 or more FX—j OK F- N/A
sheets.
8. Limits of Public Works inspection clearly shown F?�—j OK
on plan, typical section, and bond estimate.
9. Street Light locations/legend/Electric Service F-; OK r'; N/A
Connection Location shown.
10. Elevation tied to City benchmark. OK
Reference City benchmark.
Pagel of 6
COMPLY
11.
Curb grade plans prepared by Public Works have
been incorporated into improvment plans and
❑ OK
verified as adequate.
12.
Curb grade plans prepared by Engineer for review by
Public Works and cross -sections @ 50' max. intervals
FX—I OK
along road frontage and extending 150' min.
beyond limits of work. Profile line, centerline, & EP
13.
Signing and striping plan plus existing striping
F-, OK
included in improvement plans.
14.
Development No. (SUB, MS, LUP, DP) shown on each
r-, OK
sheet.
15.
Verification and land rights for off -tract work (title
i OK
report, recorded easement, etc.)
16.
Permits required from other agencies (Fish & Game
F-1 OK
CalTrans, Army Corps of Engrs, Flood Control, etc.)
17.
Right of entry submitted for review for all off -tract
❑ OK
work.
18.
Landscaping within the public right-of-way
r OK
included in improvement plans.
19.
Fence required along water district canals.
F-J OK
II.
ROADS
A.
TYPICAL SECTIONS
1.
Street cross-section shown at 50' intervals
maximum (closer intervals may be necessary per
[J 0K
the City Engineer). Cross sections slopes shown.
2.
Structural pavement design calculations submitted
(per Caltrans Highway Design Manual) and
OK
correspond to plans.
3.
Sidewalk, curb and gutter indicated with details
rZ OK
included on plans.
4.
Right -of -Way and street width dimensions shown.
r OK
5.
2:1 max. cut/fill slopes shown beginning at R/W
F OK
lines - Soils Report verifying exceptions.
6.
Crown Slope indicated.
OK
7.
Pedestrian or bike paths shown.
OK
8.
Pavement Design Chart shown with T.I. and R-values
OK
for review.
NOT APPLY CITY COMMENTS
�i N/A
�; N/A
�; N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
F_ N/A
N/A
N/A
Fx—; N/A
Page 2 of 6
B.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
PLAN VIEWS COMPLY
Radius of curvature shown on all curves. OK
20' curb return radii shown for major thoroughfares
F_
OK
and industrial streets.
24' min. curb opening for private road intersection.
1
OK
Horizontal curves and sight distance designed per
Highway Design Manual.
F-
OK
Cul-de-sac radii (35' min.) shown.
j
OK
Private road turnarounds shown.
FK_
OK
R/W and street width dimension shown.
OK
Centerline stationing shown at 50' intervals.
�)
OK
Curve info provided in table format (i.e. BC/EC
station, offset, radius, and delta).
F�—<j
OK
Lot/parcel lines and numbers/letters indicated.
OK
Valley gutters indicated. Flag flow line elevations at
quarter points on curb returns and valley gutter
OK
centerline.
OK
Stationing and offsets of all drainage structures
shown.
TC/RIM elevations at all drain structures w/ invert and
r OK
FL elevations shown. (Invert and FL elevations may
be shown on profile if preferred. If profile is not on
same sheet as plan view, TC/RIM, invert, and FL elevations
must be shown on plan and profile.)
Drainage easements shown and dimensioned.
❑ OK
Location of underground pipes and utilities shown
for laterals and main lines (i.e. sanitary sewer, gas,
FX—j OK
water, etc.).
Street monuments shown.
�� OK
Off -tract slope easement shown, with x-sections,
OK
topo and offer of dedication for slope easement
submitted for review.
Pedestrian Paths shown. Basic grade shown. r OK
Wheelchair ramps shown at returns with details. jj OK
C. PROFILES
1. Vertical curves designed for proper speeds per
F— OK
Highway Design Manual.
2. Minimum vertical curve lengths observed.
OK
3. Curb returns and cul-de-sac profiles shown (high
F— OK
and or low points indicated when vertical curve is
used.
NOT APPLY
F-1 N/A
N/A
N/A
F?�_, N/A
N/A
N/A
�I N/A
OK
r N/A
N/A
N/A
�) N/A
F-I N/A
r N/A
N/A
j N/A
N/A
N/A
�I N/A
N/A
CITY COMMENTS
Page 3 of 6
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
COMPLY
Vertical curve used for grade breaks greater than 2%.
(3% on sag curves).
J OK
F—
6% maximum gradient observed @ intersecting streets.
❑ OK
6% maximum grade observed across intersections.
F! OK
1%minimum grade observed on all streets.
OK
Maximum street grades per ordinance.
OK
Underground pipes and utilities shown.
OK
Existing ground at centerline shown. Where
OK
topography is steep, existing ground left and right of
centerline has been shown.
Finish grade profile for centerline and for top of curb
OK
shown (left & right) if special grades required.
Cul-de-sacs all have 1 %to 4%cross slope between
OK
gutter lip and high point.
Super elevation grades shown where required by
OK
Highway Design Manual.
Back of curb flow diverters indicated on proposed
county streets with grades over 5% when no sidewalk
F7 OK
installed.
Centerline profiles of intersecting streets shown to
their point of intersection. (Showing curb return or
OK
other profiles in lieu of the centerline profile is not an
adequate or correct representation.)
Off -tract profile to catch point shown where road is
❑ OK
constructed to subdivision boundary.
Centerline stations and elevations shown @ 50'
� OK
minimum intervals and @ all BVC, EVC, PIVC, and
grade breaks.
Profile slopes indicated. r OK
III.
DRAINAGE
A.
HYDROLOGY - HYDRAULICS
1.
Contours shown for 100 feet+ beyond property. �
OK
2.
100 year water surface calculations completed when
J
OK
natural watercourse or drainage facility flows through
or adjacent to subdivision or the property lies within flood
hazards or flood prone area and water surface shown on
plans.
3.
EGL, HGL, F1, E1, Q, A, S, V, freeboard at structures,
OK
structure losses, tailwater assumptions, super or
subcritical flow all indicated.
4.
Adequacy of in -tract drainage system verified.
OK
5.
All starting water surface calculations adequately
verified. (When computing beginning water surface in F-1
OK
natural watercourse and no obvious point of control is J
available, begin 500' downstream and work up to point
in question.)
NOT APPLY
Fx7I N/A
r; N/A
N/A
r N/A
F' N/A
J N/A
N/A
F_i N/A
] N/A
N/A
�J N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
ri N/A
FX_, N/A
�I N/A
CITY COMMENTS
Page 4 of 6
}
COMPLY NOT APPLY
6. Adequacy of off -tract drainage system verified. F— OK N/A
B. EASEMENTS
1.
Easements shown on map are shown on plans.
F-I OK
2.
Off -tract drainage improvements (plan and profile)
❑ OK
and accompanying easements shown. Off -tract offers
of dedication for drainage easement submitted for review.
3.
Off -tract work to be done but no easement
r-I OK
requirements. Right of entry submitted for review.
4.
Easement widths indicated for (a) closed conduits,
❑ OK
(b) open channels.
5.
Sufficient X-sections submitted to verify easement
width and Development rights for open channels.j
OK
6.
Access and ingress easements shown, graded to be
r OK
J
useable.
7.
Minimum 12' ingress easement to public way
provided to all access easements.
[f OK
8.
Minimum 40' centerline radius for access easements
❑ OK
shown.
9.
Structure setback line indicated and location verified
OK
with X-sections for unimproved channel.
10.
Fences shown as required where street crosses
r OK
watercourse or drainage structure.
11.
Fences shown as required at outside boundaries of open lined channel easements and water district canals OK
r, N/A
N/A
N/A
FX-1 N/A
�I N/A
N/A
C1 N/A
N/A
N/A
r N/A
N/A
C. STRUCTURES
1. Inlet detail shown for new inlet installation.
[X-1
OK
F—
N/A
2. Inlet depths without manhole bases and max. dia.
F-1
OK
F—
N/A
Pipes through inlets observed.
Type A 6' CC 3011 36" front 30" side
Type B 12' CC3012 36" front 30" side
Type C 4' CC3013 36" front 24" side
Type D 6' CC3016 36" front 24" side
Type E 4' CC3017 36" front 24" side
3. Max. diameter pipes through manholes observed.
Type 1 24" CC 3020
❑
OK
N/A
Type 11 42" CC 3021
Type III 60" CC 3022
4. 1.25" minimum freeboard in inlets and manholes.
❑
OK
r
N/A
[�
OK
N/A
5. HGL shown in all structure profiles.
6. Structure type indicated on plan or on structure list
F7
OK
N/A
on same plan sheet.
CITY COMMENTS
Page 5 of 6
COMPLY NOT APPLY
CITY COMMENTS
D.
PIPES
1.
Closed conduit minimum slope of 0.005 observed.
OK
2.
Natural watercourses are placed in closed
�
OK
conduits for flows less than 80 cfs.
3.
Storm drain calculations submitted and correspond
❑
OK
with plans.
4.
Water directed into inlet does not reverse the
F�<j—
OK
direction of flow.
5.
Minimum centerline radii of pipe checked.
Beveled RCP lengths specified (bevel one or both
❑
OK
ends) and stationing of EC and BC indicated.
6.
Outlet protection for closed conduits or lined
OK
channels provided.
7.
2' minimum cover over pipe observed (provided
F
OK
manufacturer specs does not require more) unless
special design and calcs.
8.
Design Q shown on pipe profile.
❑
OK
OK
9.
Minimum cleansing velocity of 2 FPS with half
design flow observed.
F
OK
10.
18" minimum pipe size.
E.
CHANNELS
1.
Maximum velocity in earth channel verified by
❑
OK
soils report - minimum velocity 3 FPS.
2.
Improved earth channel side slopes shown to be
2:1 or less steep as specified by soils report.
❑
OK
3.
Lined channel side slopes as specified by soils
r
OK
report.
4.
Areas noted to be cleared of structures, trees,
❑
OK
brush, and debris within natural channel and
watercourses.
N/A
�i N/A
rl N/A
r N/A
r� N/A
N/A
N/A
F—
j N/A
N/A
Fj N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
r N/A
J:\FORMS\Templates\Land Development\Street Improvements\Checklist for Street Improvement Plans STATIC form2.pdf
Rev. 1 /12
Page 6 of 6
0
O F F I C E
c,9
` Q�
—4742-
-4746— ups
—474B-
-4750—
c�
—4754—
<
—4758-
-4762—
�aa
—4766—
Ja
—4770-
-4774-
-4778-
-4782-
-4786-
-4790-
794 4.99 AC. ;
O F C 0 U N A S S E S S O R
219.74
46_Z31
PCL. B
8.733 AC.
C J
O}1
M \
N U
MORELAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
57
�w
621.01
KN_
�3
31.43
CIL- RD.
L.L.A. 18046916
9
S A N T A
C L A R A
P. M. 656-M-39
C/L - - - W. CAMPBELL
(/)[�94
80-94
�eB.85 7
1e1.8 43.9E 119.73Z
53 ��
54OPCL2
PCL 3
1.56 AC 1
1.87 AC
I
as
169.61
223.60 al
`'L —WHITWO®D
— LANE
I
1e
��
®LEO
27
60
O
�
36
0
3
P, M. 672- M-40
1
I
1
1
•I
ml
N1
I
I
I
COUNTY,
C A L I F 0 R N I A
BOOK PAGE
403 2
—w—�--E—
O�
4P
200'
c
- - AVE. - CAL
/57o v v 1530
129.08
4r0.82 47.53 98.19 141 I 142.88 Q REF
?S 4WO
'S5fr
PTN. PCL.�4� I �'n" -
. AtP
44 �� 140.99
49
45
�I
PTN. PCL. 4 ml
(4.84 AC. TOTAL) 1.25 AC.9 1.98 AC. NET
_ PCL.2 I PCL.3-
145.38 406.88 30 -R/bY 2Bs.9B
....ems ... �..•�� ... .. 219 9292 Q
P.M. 629-M-16 2.o30ACMET
- 2967
J L7
39
41
r�
CO)
a 404
H 1
d
5.c7 Cn
�JW I
167.T5
BUCKNALL c/I. RD.--- ---�
P. M. 256-M-18 I
59 I
LAWRENCE E. STONE — ASSESSOR
Cadastral map for assessment purposes only.
Compiled under R. do T. Code, Sec. 327.
Effective Roll Year 200 —2006