Street Improvements CITY OF CAMPBELL - 1 rr t Form
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS �Pan
ENGINEERING DIVISION - RECE I
70 North First Street,Campbell,CA 95008
Ph. (408)866-2150;Fx.(408)376-0958V t 2016
CHECKLIST FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT P kAAdministration
APPLICATION NO(S):
ADDRESS: I3Z > rd-
Instructions: This checklist provides advance notification to applicants of the City of Campbell's final street improvement plans and
submittal requirements. Using this checklist will expedite your application through the City's review process.
Prior to submitting a final street improvement plan list to the City Engineer,please place an"X"in the space to the right of each item below to
indicate you have compiled with,or place"N/A"to indicate that the particular item doesn not apply. Review applicable sections,which are
referenced in parentheses,before checking off each item.
SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF ENGINEER OF WORK
I HEREBY DECLARE THAT I AM THE ENGINEER OF WORK FOR THIS PROJECT,THAT I HAVE EXERCISED RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OVER THE DESIGN
OF THE PROJECT,AND COMPLETION OF THIS CHECKLIST,AS DEFINED IN SECTION 6703 OF THE BUSINESS AND PROFESSION CODE,AND THAT
THE DESIGN IS CONSISTENT WITH CURRENT STANDARDS.
Signature Date
Printed Name: ��c.�12•p•t1J
RCE#: 15 2-7?ju'
... _. .- _. - - -- -J
Expiration Date: (SEAL)
ITEMS COMPLY NOT APPLY CITY COMMENTS
I. GENERAL
OK
1. City standard off-site title sheet with applicable notes.
2. 24"X36"sheet size used,including City Ci Standard rV1 OK
borders and Blueprint for a Clean Bay Plan Sheet.
OK `
3. Title Block/Scale/North Arrow Shown.
4. Plans capable of microfilm reproductions-minimum V OK
1/8 inch lettering.
5. Engineer's name,number,expiration date and VOK
signature included on all sheets.
6. Vicinity Map shown(must be microfilmable). OK
7. Sheet Index and key map included for 3 or more ( OK N/A
sheets.
8. Limits of Public Works inspection clearly shown OK
on plan,typical section,and bond estimate.
9. Street Light locations/legend/Electric Service �OK N/A
Connection Location shown.
10. Elevation tied to City benchmark
Reference City benchmarkVOK
Page 1 of 6
COMPLY NOT APPLY CITY COMMENTS
11. Curb grade plans prepared by Public Works have
been incorporated into improvment plans and OK N/A
_.....
verified as adequate.
12. Curb grade plans prepared by Engineer for review by
Public Works and cross-sections @ 50'max.intervals OK N/A
along road frontage and extending 150'min.
beyond limits of work. Profile line,centerline,&EP
13. Signing and striping plan plus existing striping OK N/A
included in improvement plans.
14. Development No.(SUB,MS,LUP,DP)shown on each OK N/A
sheet.
15. Verification and land rights for off-tract work(title OK N/A
report,recorded easement,etc.)
16. Permits required from other agencies(Fish&Game � OK �' N/A
CalTrans,Army Corps of Engrs,Flood Control,etc.)
17. Right of entry submitted for review for all off-tract ( OK N/A
9 rY
work.
18. Landscaping within the public right-of-way � K N/A
included in improvement plans. r
19. Fence required along water district canals. OK N/A
II. ROADS
A. TYPICAL SECTIONS
1. Street cross-section shown at 50'intervals
maximum(closer intervals may be necessary per OK N/A
the City Engineer). Cross sections slopes shown.
2. Structural pavement design calculations submitted
(per Caltrans Highway Design Manual)and OK F—, N/A
correspond to plans.
3. Sidewalk,curb and gutter indicated with details
included on plans. 1 OK r N/A
4. Right-of-Way and street width dimensions shown. OK
5. 2:1 max.cut/fill slopes shown beginning at R/W
lines-Soils Report verifying exceptions. OK N/A r`
6. Crown Slope indicated. OK r N/A
7. Pedestrian or bike paths shown. [ OK N/A
W
8. Pavement Design Chart shown with T.I. and R-valuesOK N/A
for review.
Page 2 of 6
B. PLAN VIEWS COMPLY NOT APPLY CITY COMMENTS
1. Radius of curvature shown on all curves. �OK F—, N/A
2. 20'curb return radii shown for major thoroughfares r/OK r- N/A
and industrial streets.
3. 24'min.curb opening for private road intersection.
OK r" N/A
4. Horizontal curves and sight distance designed per
Highway Design Manual. ✓OK Fi N/A
5. Cul-de-sac radii(35'min.)shown.
✓OK r' N/A
6. Private road turnarounds shown. OK r N/A
7. R/W and street width dimension shown. V r; N/A
r
8. Centerline stationing shown at 50'intervals. OK OK-
9. Curve info provided in table format(i.e.BC/EC ,_,/
station,offset,radius,and delta). PWOK r-I N/A
r- N/A
10. Lot/parcel lines and numbers/letters indicated.
11. Valley gutters indicated. Flag flow line elevations at
quarter points on curb returns and valley gutter OK (!) N/A
centerline.
r� r`
12. Stationing and offsets of all drainage structures OK N/A
shown.
13. TC/RIM elevations at all drain structures w/invert and
FL elevations shown. (Invert and FL elevations may J 0K F7 N/A
be shown on profile if preferred. If profile is not on
same sheet as plan view,TC/RIM,invert,and FL elevations
must be shown on plan and profile.)
14. Drainage easements shown and dimensioned. F OK rI N/A
15. Location of underground pipes and utilities shown
for laterals and main lines(i.e.sanitary sewer,gas, C OK r j N/A
water,etc.).
16. Street monuments shown. �✓ OK r N/A
17. Off-tract slope easement shown,with x-sections,
topo and offer of dedication for slope easement OK r; N/A
submitted for review.
18. Pedestrian Paths shown. Basic grade shown. I 'i OK N/A
19. Wheelchair ramps shown at returns with details. rJ OK N/A
C. PROFILES
1. Vertical curves designed for proper speeds per OK r7l N/A
Highway Design Manual.
2. Minimum vertical curve lengths observed. F71. OK F N/A
3. Curb returns and cul-de-sac profiles shown(high OK N/A
and or low points indicated when vertical curve is - ri
used.
Page 3 of 6
COMPLY NOT APPLY CITY COMMENTS
4. Vertical curve used for grade breaks greater than 2%.
(3%on sag curves). [�✓OK r N/A
S. 6%maximum gradient observed @ intersecting streets.W OK rl N/A
6. 6%maximum grade observed across intersections. OK F—, N/A
7. 1%minimum grade observed on all streets. [ OK N/A
8. Maximum street grades per ordinance. OK N/A
r-
9. Underground pipes and utilities shown. V N/A
10. Existing ground at centerline shown. Where OK N/A
topography is steep,existing ground left and right of
centerline has been shown. /
11. Finish grade profile for centerline and for top of curb �/ OK N/A
shown(left&right)if special grades required. III��V
12. Cul-de-sacs all have 1%to 4%cross slope between OK [7, N/A
gutter lip and high point.
13. Super elevation grades shown where required by
OK N/A
Highway Design Manual. (!
14. Back of curb flow diverters indicated on proposed
county streets with grades over 5%when no sidewalk F OK N/A
installed.
15. Centerline profiles of intersecting streets shown to
their point of intersection. (Showing curb return or VOK ( N/A
other profiles in lieu of the centerline profile is not an
adequate or correct representation.)
16. Off-tract profile to catch point shown where road is R/OK F7 N/A
constructed to subdivision boundary.
17. Centerline stations and elevations shown @ 50'
minimum intervals and @ all BVC,EVC,PIVC,and OK �" N/A
grade breaks.
18. Profile slopes indicated. OK r N/A
111. DRAINAGE
A. HYDROLOGY-HYDRAULICS
1. Contours shown for 100 feet+beyond property. y/ K N/A
2. 100 year water surface calculations completed when
natural watercourse or drainage facility flows through OK N/A
or adjacent to subdivision or the property lies within flood
hazards or flood prone area and water surface shown on
plans.
3. EGL,HGL,F1,E1,Q,A,S,V,freeboard at structures, OK N/A
structure losses,tailwater assumptions,super or
subcritical flow all indicated.
4. Adequacy of in-tract drainage system verified. _ OK N/A
5. All starting water surface calculations adequately
verified. (When computing beginning water surface in �—J OK ' N/A
natural watercourse and no obvious point of control is
available,begin 500'downstream and work up to point
in question.) Page 4of6
COMPLY NOT APPLY CITY COMMENTS
6. Adequacy of off-tract drainage system verified. r' OK r' N/A
B. EASEMENTS
1. Easements shown on map are shown on plans. OK r N/A
2. Off-tract drainage improvements(plan and profile) P/ OK C N/A
and accompanying easements shown. Off-tract offers
of dedication for drainage easement submitted for review.
3. Off-tract work to be done but no easement OK F- N/A
requirements. Right of entry submitted for review.
4. Easement widths indicated for(a)closed conduits, OK N/A
(b)open channels.
5. Sufficient X-sections submitted to verify easement
width and Development rights for open channels. OK N/A
6. Access and ingress easements shown,graded to be OK N/A
useable.
7. Minimum 12'ingress easement to public way
provided to all access easements. OK r N/A
8. Minimum 40'centerline radius for access easements
shown.
_....� OK � N/A
9. Structure setback line indicated and location verified
with X-sections for unimproved channel. OK N/A
10. Fences shown as required where street crosses OK r N/A
watercourse or drainage structure. —
11. Fences shown as required at outside boundaries of
open lined channel easements and water district canals. OK N/A
C. STRUCTURES
1. Inlet detail shown for new inlet installation. r OK r N/A
2. Inlet depths without manhole bases and max.dia. OK N/A
Pipes through inlets observed. r'
Type A 6' CC 3011 36"front 30"side
Type B 12' CC3012 36"front 30"side
Type C 4' CC3013 36"front 24"side
Type D 6' CC3016 36"front 24"side
Type E 4' CC3017 36"front 24"side
3. Max.diameter pipes through manholes observed.
Type 24" CC 3020 OK r N/A
Typell 42" CC 3021
Type III 60" CC 3022
4. 1.25"minimum freeboard in inlets and manholes. C'! OK [7 N/A
5. HGL shown in all structure profiles. -
OK F—, N/A
6. Structure type indicated on plan or on structure list (—, OK F7 N/A
on same plan sheet.
Page 5 of 6
COMPLY NOT APPLY CITY COMMENTS
D. PIPES
1. Closed conduit minimum slope of 0.005 observed. F OK r N/A
2. Natural watercourses are placed in closed
conduits for flows less than 80 cfs. r OK r N/A
3. Storm drain calculations submitted and correspond F-1 OK F-' N/A
with plans.
4. Water directed into inlet does not reverse the
direction of flow. OK r N/A
5. Minimum centerline radii of pipe checked.
Beveled RCP lengths specified(bevel one or both F- OK r' N/A
ends)and stationing of EC and BC indicated.
6. Outlet protection for closed conduits or lined OK N/A
channels provided.
7. 2'minimum cover over pipe observed(provided OK 17 N/A
manufacturer specs does not require more)unless
special design and calcs.
8. Design Q shown on pipe profile. OK N/A
9. Minimum cleansing velocity of 2 FPS with half r OK r` N/A
design flow observed.
F-; OK N/A
10. 18"minimum pipe size.
E. CHANNELS
1. Maximum velocity in earth channel verified by F- OK r` N/A
soils report-minimum velocity 3 FPS.
2. Improved earth channel side slopes shown to be
2:1 or less steep as specified by soils report. r OK r N/A
3. Lined channel side slopes as specified by soils OK N/A
report.
4. Areas noted to be cleared of structures,trees,
brush,and debris within natural channel and OK N/A
watercourses.
J.\FORMS\Templates\Land Development\Street Improvements\Checklist for Street Improvement Plans STATIC form2.pdf
Rev.1/12 Page 6 of 6