Loading...
MM 86-11CITY OF CAMPBELL 1875 S. BASCOM MM 86-11 1 of 3 D. T. N. I REVISIONS NS�119;5 fl ,L.+ Tt ��vl�sC.eEs�K�'JV Ni N' I ' _ - � g7v�IVE t9ne+'• D�.1"►N. OF TITt4 p.�c1� i 1 i 1f AACACZ I �. 1II I ` .CGe•. TaR.4AROJ, I v - � V`J,♦1.E-�t � c6,W. I "— - _JBB Y �. Q.. ARCADE rry.ar�_ LI 1 i F E AG U) 11 2 3 5E S G •„ .�C i I FIRST FLOOR 19 ROOMS 19.912 SQ. FT. CONSULTANT covsAX190 WALK S� fze-ols� 9 E�1.�4.�•6�-1�-T i tn. > Ei_ t3 ✓Rf� O Ij I 11 I 2 0 l S I 81 ® IT21 3 5 8 9 1 11 12 19 U 16 BASEMENT 5002 !Q. FT. NOTES : PARKING SUMMARY REQUIRED 118 COMMERCIAL 14 HOTEL 94 • 10 104 EXISTING 117 1 IN INNED—E AFE• 1 LEGEND LANDSCAPING 0 ••t3 9EFN <.� . NISSIOu .•. �4NIA a•'•t..< f0 TM 1011-1- 31E A.. rra D. T. N. c0-49 �olq 7. I 7,5 -7 56--.) J L A,l T- NS CONSULTANT HEDLEY THE PRUNEYARD INN WASSOCIAND STARI ASSOCIATED ARCH TUB FRUNRYARD. 1875 *OVTZ BASCOM AVZ- CAMPBZLL — CALIFORNIA -7 --r- j --r-7 -T-T-T2F ' I ' 1 311'1 41 5 el FB MQ F TIT2 li 4 ­7­7 -Ai 4— VeNco o SECOND FLOOR 37 ROOMS 23.804 SO. FT NOTES : s -•r FF Li p r n T r n l • y j -r '� Z I L 1 :� - a a n' 3' z- n a I" v t tt rr • -� r = i c , e i a v --•iFIt. -v tr r ram- -� 7 >s �'�'i�'R 1-'3-9-"r'an a Q `_d- q� . • r-T FT.n n -i � "t. - � � r- r R.Jpt-s - r � • � ^�w, . + a ,�: r- r _ . . � (p►����� '�{� �a a >f a _.Lrl -• L -Ju i f r�10 ErT J. , F . - • .. .. ,�-.• --jj�� ll --4 r r rT r r v rrra m, s r a -- �-T 7-r --- _-- -=-s�-t i r r 'i "f"' "i�i inu a'�7 r= a" c a n u�" 3 t�i •3 c i e" r r i z n a n r v ru a■ r i a= n-a r - -�}�• � r • +l' 11 f�T'T'7 --- - -- �Atr- - — .., ! .. - ?: 5�' �, yr` I �• �.r.nnn./?iv�,',v'.-- ..,.p�,�f.r_, - - _: -+�-5-'. �y1�6�-��� _-s•-�-�'�°'�"r T ^^� _ z r , i i �2; - - T J •v-� r � ,e,, a.`i �. -�I;•--*, -V-�" 1-_-y7•: -;. n_s. a.ta a r I � i `T-z s-a x-; ".'-ta TIJ Lj I� 1 ' V L I' LEGEND OSpanish trowel texture stucco ! 91 Plaster-. �/p Mond double hung windows with doable glazing Planters with heary wood caps /mil t 7J Heavy tuber posts and beans // Awning shelter Clay the roofing to catch existing /Q Leaded glass V Wrought iron balconies /,� Sheet aetal chimney caps Wrought Iron screen Store fronts to be designed as leased ^/ '7 Glass ///t 1/61 French bean OConcrete colors o, Plastered "chimneys" THE PRUNEYAR,D INN TH= PRUNRTARD, 1e76 •OVT! sA/COM AQZ. CAWFHZLL - CALIFORNIA NORTH I t rt—f t+ u, Z Y ]r rr 3 t 3 r rl f j yti�all-c-1 HEDLEY AND STARK, INC. ASSOCIATED ARCHITECTS 346 EAST CAMPSELL AVENUE CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 TELEPHONE 379-7404 1 1 1r 1 41 J a 5 gl 2I g S ® I 1I J 8 -T7 1 11 12 131 15 SOUTH DR Er,OWED APR W6 CITY OF CAMPECLL PLANN- OEPI F T ~ PRELIMINARY ELEVATIONS SCALE : 1,S• • 1•-0 PLANNING COMI4ISSION "� n June 10, 1986 MM 86-11 Application of Mr. Morris Stark, on S 86-03 behalf of Mr. Fred Sahadi, for approval Stark, M. of plans and elevations to permit a modification to a previously approved plan to allow the construction of a 94-unit motel, related restaurant and recreational facilities, and 2,778 sq.fr. of retail space in the northerly portion of an existlug shopping center (The Pruneyard) cn property known as 1875 S. bascom Ave. In a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Perrine reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is requesting additional detail to come back to the Planning Director. The Architectural Advisor was quite impressed with the design of the changes submitted. A parking concern was discussed by the Committee; howover, the Committee believes a plan can be worked out whereby a detailed parking plan will come back prior to the issue of a building permit. Such a plan to include the details of valet parking, and designated parking. Approval is recommended with that one concern regarding parking. Chairman Kasolas as;ad when, in the past, the Commission has made a parking plan a condition of the building permit. Commissioner Perrine noted that in this particular case, there are many uses on the site and there appear to have been concerns previously expressed regarding the parking on this site. The recommendation regarding the parking plan was a,judgment call of the Committee. f !Ir. Kee noted that there is a condition on the previously approved S 86-03 which indicates that if is parking is provided for the motel, Planning Comnmission approval is required. Chairman Kasoias noted that, in other words, if the applicant wishes to move the project ahead without desinated parking it would be permissable. Chairman Dickson indicated tlat the Commission has the authority to put any condition on a project, regardless of what was done in the past. Commissioner Christ stated that he and Commissioner rairbanks brought out the parking, issue when this project was first before the Commission. There are several uses on this site, and it is the applicant's obligation to provide the Commission with the information on how he can make that parking work. Commissioner Christ continued that there are also recommended findings which deal with parking - the Commission is asked to find that there is adequate parking. In that there is no evidence supporting this finding, Conmissioner Christ felt it should be taken off. lie noted that he would be willing to make that finding if information is provided which proves that the parking will work. Commissioner Stanton noted that it has been determined that sufficient parking is available - where did the term "designated" parking come from? Who enforces the designated parking? Mr. Kee stated that if there is going to be designated parking - a detailed plan should be provided. Lengthy discussion ensued regarding the provision of adequate parking; designated parking; and, the concept of valet: parking. M/S: Dickson, Stanton - That the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and approve MII 86-II/S 86-03, subject to the attached conditions. DISCUSSION OF MOTION Comuissioner Oiszewski stated his concern about the area directly adjacent to the motel being designated parking. However, he noted that he had a problem with the building, permit being held up just to get a parking plan. He asked if there was another way. Commissioner Dickson noted that Condition 17 handles this concern. Commissioner Christ stated that he felt there was parking being desipnated, but not being shown on the presented plans. lie noted that he would prefer not to have designated parking; however, if there is to be designated parking he would like to know where it is and how it will work so that there will be minimal problems. Ile continued that he is against making everything designated, and would rather see some designated parking at this point, and more later if necessary. Wr WWI -16- Mr. Fred Sahadi, applicant, spoke at length regarding the designated parking at the shopping center. Mr. Sahadi indicated that he would like the Commission to give him flexibility in the number of spaces to be dasignated for motel use. Lengthy discussed ensued regarding this issue of designated parking. At this time, Commissioners Dickson and Stanton withdrew their motion for approval. Commissioner Olszewski asked !'r. Sahadi how much time would be needed for a designated parking plan to come back to the Commission. !Sr. Sahadi stated that there was a designated parking plan before the Commission, lie asked that the Commission give leeway to approve the plan and let him come back to the Site Committee for approval (as opposed to the Commission as a whole), in that he did not know just how many designated spaces would work. The number of spaces necessary rill not be determined until the motel is in operation. Commissioner Dickson asked if there was designated parking on the presented plan, or not. Mr. Kee responded that it could be interpreted either way, in that there j is nothing written on the plan to specify designated parking. Chairman Kasolas noted that the applicant wants the ability to designate no more than 117 spaces at some time in the future, or less, as seen fit. This is necessary for the financing purposes on the project. Mr. Kee stated that he would suggest that the presented plans be redlined to indicate the Co.=ission's choice. M/S: Dickson, Stanton - That the Planning Commission adopt findings as attached, and approve m 86-11/S 86-03, subject to conditions indicated in the Staff Report dated June 10, 1986, minus Condition A17 ("If designated parking is provided for the inn, Planning Commission approval is required"), and with the statement added that the Planning Commission determined that up to 117 parking spaces may be designated for motel use only. Motion carried with a vote of 5-1-1, with Commissioner Christ voting "no", and Commissioner Fairbanks 1-ing absent. * • r. PUBLIC ItEARI cs i RECOMMENDED FINDINGS l FILL NO: m 86- SI1F: ADDRESS: 1875 S. BASCO`! AVE APPLICANT: SAIIADI, F. 1. The proposed architectural design is compatible to the remainder of the Pruneyard Shipping Center. The provided parkin; facilities, in conjunction with the provision of a valet parking service, should provide an adequate number of parking spaces for this project. i 3. The proposed motel, retail and cafe uses are permitted uses in the C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. I ��9�'`�N1h1';^'!tr.....�.. ,'wr .+n ,. .. r w,1 �i11•M'.A,.'� CONDITIONS OF APPROVMM 86-II/S 86-03 APPLICANT: Sahadi. F. SITE ADDRESS: 1875 S. Bascom Ave. P.C. lffC. Jwie 10. 1986 The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. 1. Revised elevations to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director upon recorm:endatfon of the Architectural Advisor prior to application for a building permit. 2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 3. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $4,000.00 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file written c.�eement to complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas Bond or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to application for a building permit. 5. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if boxes are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director. 6. All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. 7. Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are installed. 8. All parking and -Iriveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. 9. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. 10. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. 11. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and ,,ermit issued by Planning and Building Departments (Section 21.68.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code). CONDITIONS OF APPROV NM 86-II/S 86-03 APPLICANT: Sahadi, F. SITE ADDCESS: 1875 S. Bascom Ave. Page 2. 12. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubhish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. 13. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closin,p, doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 14. Noise levels for the interior of residential units shall comply with minimum State (Title 25) and local standards as indicated in the Noise Element of the Campbell General Plan. 15. The applicant is hereby notified that the property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that actual construction co.—ences. All e.:isting structures shall be secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed from the property. Sect. 11.201 6 11.414, 1979 Ed. Uniform Fire Code. PLANNING DEPA.4T11ENT 16. Sale of alcoholic beverages is prohibited in the cafe and breakfast room unless a conditional use permit is approved FIRE DEPARTMENT 17. Provide an automatic sprinkler system in all areas of the new structure. 18. Provide required occupancy separations between the motel d shopping center and the restaurant 6 motel. RFDEVELOPM3T AGENCY BUILDING DCPAR- FNT PUBLIC NORKS DF.PARTIENT No comment at this time. PLANNING CO'PIISSION 19. At its meeting of June 10. 1986, the Planning Commission approved W1 86-11, and determined that up to 117 parking spaces may be designated for motel use only. ITEM NO. 13 I STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMMISSION ttEF.TING OF JUNE 10. 1986 i MM86-11 Application of Mr. Morris Stark, on behalf i S R6-t13 of Mr. Fred Sahadi, for approval of plans Stark, M. and elevations to permit a modification to a previously approved plan to allow the construction of a 94 unit motel, related restaurant and recreational facilities and 2.778 sq.ft. of retail space in the northerly Portion of an existing shopping center (The Pruneyard) on property known as 1875 S. Bascom Ave, in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. That the Planning.. Commission continue the consideration of this application to its meeting of July 8, 1986 so that revised plans may be submitted; or 2. That the Planning, Commission adopt the attached findings and approve the applicant's proposal, subject to the attached conditions. STAFF DISCUSSION At its previous meeting of March 25, 1986, the Planning Commission approved the applicant's proposal to construct a 79 room inn on the northerly portion of the Prunevard Shopping Center. The applicant, at this time, is requesting approval of a modification to this approval to allow the following changes: 1. An increase in the number of approved rooms from 79 to 94. 2. The retention of 2,778 sq.ft, of retail space. 3. The enlargement of the size of some of the rooms of the inn. 4. The provision of a breakfast room, sun deck and spa. I 5. The construction of a third story to accommodate these additional items. The applicant is requesting approval of revised plans and elevations to allow the construction of a 94 room inn. The proposed inn would be accommodated in a three-story structure located in a portion of the Pruneyard previously approved for a single story of retail use. The applicant's lettec of request is attached. This portion of the Pruneyard is currently occupied by some existing retail shops and a partially completed space with only a roof structure. This existing, portion of the shopping center occupies approximately 23,000 sq.ft. !M 86-11/s 86-03 -2- June 10. 1986 Building elevations indicate the construction of a three-story spanish style structure which relates we11 with the remainder of the Pruneyard. The proposed structure accommodates approximately 72,614 sq.ft, of building area. Landscapinp is indicated in raised planters along the exterior walkways and in the interior cour,yards. The applicant has indicated the provision of 117 parking spaces in the immediate area of the proposed inn. The proposed use would require the provision of 118 parking spaces assuming the cafe and breakfast room are not open to the public. If the cafe is open to the public and an assumed occupancy of 45 persons is indicated, an additional 15 parking spaces would be required. In conjunction with this revised proposal, the applicant has submitted a traffic report which is attached for the Commission's review. This report concludes that the proposed traffic generated from this proposal will be the same or less than generated by the retail space previously approved for the Pruneyard. The Architectural Advisor is of the opinion that the project design is even better than before. Ile does request that further detail be provided of the inn lobby and entrance. staff is recommending a continuance of this application so that plans can be submitted addressing the concerns of the Architectural Advisor, if approved then subject to the Staff's conditions. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: MM 86-Il/S 86-03 APPLICANT: fir. Norris Stark SITE ADDRESS: 1875 S. Bascom Ave. P.C. MTG. 6-10-86 The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. �. 1. Revised elevations to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor prior to application for a buildinq permit. 2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 3. Landscaping plan indicating type .end size of plant material, and location of irrigatiun system to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $ 4,000.00 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing„ and striping of parking, areas. Bond ur i,treement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to application for a �uf ld ing permit. I. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department, prior to installation of POSE utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if boxes are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director. 6. All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. 7. Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are installed. B. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. 9. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. 10. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. 11. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is a2Proved and permit issued by Planning and Building Departments (Sectio. 21.68.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code). CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: MM 86-11/S 86-03 APPI. ICANT: Mr. Morris Stark S,TE. ADDRESS: 1875 S. Bascom Ave. P.C. MTC. 6-10-86 PAGE 2. 12. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish producea within the limits of the City .,f Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. 13. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall he located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self -closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 14. Noise levels for the interior of residential units shall comply with minimum State (Title 25) and local standards as indicated in the Noise Element of the Campbell General Plan. 15. The apnlicant is hereby notified that the property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures shall be secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed from the property. Sect. 11.201 S 11.414, 1979 Ed. uniform Fire Code. PLANNIN: DEPARTMENT 16. Sale of alcoholic beverages is prohibited in the cafe and breakfast room unless a conditional use permit is approved. 17. If designated parking is provided for the inn, Planning Commission approval .s required. FIRE. DEPARTMENT 18. Provide an automatic sprinkler system in all areas of the new structure. 15�. Provide required occupancy separations between the motel 6 shopping center and the restaurant 6 motel. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUILDING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT No comment at this time. 7 MEDLEY AND STARK, INC. ASSOCIATED ARCHITECTS TELEPHONE (408) 179-7404 April .a, 198b Mr. Arthur Kee, Planning Director RD HEM City of Campbell Nf�. ;D _ ' I,��b 'S North Central Avenue Campbell, California 95008 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT Subiect: The Pruneyard Inn Dear Sir This is a response to your suggestion that a rationale, for expanding the proiect from two stories to three, be submitted for the review of all concerned. I agree and appreciate the suggestion. In the initial stage, 1 think we saw the project primarily as a solution to the emp•,y, unleasable spaces at the north side of the Pruneyard and the first schematic (the one we hurriedly submitted on February <21) reflected an attempt to maximize the number of units within the existing structural module. This led to room sizes (214 and 28 foot lengths) which, through subsequent studv, were found to be inconsistent with the competitive market sizes and amenities. This led to an additional reflection oT Just what type of facility would stand on its own in the hotel marketplace. Mould it be iust a substitute for a non- working area or would it be a first class, highly competitive, vital facility instead. The decision was obvious arc all efforts to upgrade were in response to the latter alternative. Increasing the room lengths by 33 percent on the ground floor, within the existing constraints, meant we would lose 19 to '7 rooms on that level so the third story was a solution to replacing them and :n a more desirable location than opening on to the public arcade and parking lot. The third floor added only eight feet of height (after adiusting the roof pitch slightly) but allowed the irclusion of upgraded amenities such as the larger rooms, sun deck, suites to rooms ratio, related commercial space, etc., all in a more viable co5t package. .As you can surmise, the cost of staff salaries, elevators, central circulation and Lob:�y space, basement, Construction start ups, tile roofs, etc. remain comparalle for both two story and three story solutions, so that increasing the number of rooms from 79 to 94 males a great positive difference in the income generated versus const.,ction cost ratio. It could be the difference in economic viability. 346 EAST CAMPBELL AVENUE • CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 To illustrate the comparison of the original 14' by 24' rooms and the new 14' x 32' rooms I am attaching some study sketches of each. I apologise for the rough format but the timing is a little early for final drawings. Thanks again and let me know if there are questions, or things we can do, prior to the Architecture and Site Review. Yours truly, Morris Stark cc: Fred Sahadi LOUIS H. LARSON. INC. OVIL AND TRAFFI( U4GINEtRING 885 No San Antonio Road • Los Altos. California 94022 (415) 949-1124 TRAFFIC REPORT The Prunev;rd Inn Proposed Motel Development in the Pruneyard Shopping Center Campbell, California May, 1985 RECEOWED MAY ;. 1 1986 CITY OF CAMPBELL PL NN-0 DEPnRTM=NT Louis H. Larson R.T.E. No. 59 f I 0 9 CONTFNTS Summary of Report page i Project Description 1 Trip Generation 1 Traffic Distribution 2 Project Traffic Impacts 2 Discussion of Project Traffic Impacts 2 Figure 1 - Schematic Floor Plan, First Floor Figure 2 - Schematic Floor Plan, 2nd and 3rd Floor Figure 3 - PM Peak Hour Project Traffic Assignment j UPw, - Summary of Report The Pruneyard proposes to build the Pruneyard Inn, a 94-room motel with some associated retail and restaurant space, on a site that is now occupied by vacant buildings originally planned for retail use. The Pruneyard Inn and its appurtenances will generate an estimated 1170 daily vehicle trips and 80 peak hour trips when fully occi,ied. This amount of traffic will increase existing traffic volumes at six nearby signalized intersections on Bascom Avenue and on Campbell Avenue. The percentage increases to total PM peak hour traffic at these intersections is one percent or less. If comparisons are made between the amount of traffic that would be generated by the Pruneyard Inn and traffic that would be generated by the potential retail space that is beingremoved b the y project, it is shown that the project will generate the same number of daily trips and 28 percent less PM peal; hour trips than the retail development. i 'w Project Description The Pruneyard proposes to build a motel development, namely The Pruneyard Inn, on a portion of the existing Pruneyard shopping center in Campbell. The project consists of a 94-room motel with breakfast room for motel guests, a 1000 square foot restaurant/cafe and 2800 square feet of retail shops. The floor plans are shown on Figures .l and 2, which are reduced scale copies of schematic floor plans prepared by Hadley and Stark, Inc., Associates Architects. The location of the Pruneyard Inn is on the north side of the Pruneyard shopping center, between Grodins and the Food Villa. It will be built on space now occupied by vacant building shells originally intended for retail shops. These buildings with 23,000 square feet of potential retail space will be demolished. Access to the site will be from Campbell Avenue by way of the main Pruneyard exit -entrance driveways, or from Bascom Avenue by way of the existing collector drive along the north side of the shopping center. Project Trip Generation Trip generation from the project has been calculated usinq rates published in the 3rd Edition Trip Generation Hand:,00k by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The rates are summarized below: Daily Peak Hour Factor Land Use Trip Rate (PM Peak Hour) Motel 10.14 TE/occupied room 6.4% Retaurant 74.9 TE/1000 sq. ft. 8.2% Retail 50.6 TE/1000 sq. ft. 9.5% According to I'IE, a motel is classified as a place of lodging offering sleeping accommodations and possibly a retaurant. Most of the motels surveyed by Caltrans and referenced in the ITE studies included restaurants. The breakfast room on the second flor is intended to be for the convenience of motel guests and is included in the motel trip generation; traffic from the cafe has been calculated separately, since this may be used by the general public. The trip generation for the retail stores Yas been calculated at the rate that applies to the entire Pruneyard shopping certer, which is stated to he 50.6 trips per 1000 square feet for , shopping center with 200,000 to 299,000 square feet. Trip generation from the project is as follows: Daily PM Peak Hour Laid Use Size Trips Trips In/Out Motel 94 rooms 953 61 30/31 Restaurant 1000 sq. ft. 75 6 4/2 Retail 2800 sq. ft. 142 13 7/6 TOTALS: 1170 80 41/39 Project Traffic Distribution Project generated traffic has been distributed to the surrounding street system as follows: for the motel traffic, 60 percent of the trips have been assigned to Bascom Avenue northbound, 20 percent to Bascom Avenue southbound and 20 percent to Campbell Avenue westbound; for the retail and restaurant traffic, trips have been distributed uniformly in all directions. PM peak tour project traffic distribution is shown on Figure 3. Project Traffic impacts Traffic impacts have been assessed by comparing project traffic with existing traffic at six nearby signalized intersections, using traffic counts furnished by the City of Campbell. A 1.5 percent per year growth factor has been added to all existing counts to update them to 1986. The percentage increases at the intersections are as follows: Existin^ 8 Increase to Traffic Project Total total intersec- Intersection _(with growth) Trips Trips tion traffic Hamilton Bascom 7674 44 7718 0.68 Bascom/Campisi 4469 44 4513 1.0% Bascom/Campbell 6028 18 6046 0.3% Campbell/Union 3425 18 3443 0.5� Orchard City/First 1573 9 1582 0.6% First/Civic Center 1372 9 1381 0.7% Discussion of Project Traffic Impacts The ITE rates for retail facilities reflect the fact that traffic generated at shopping centers includes trips made for more than one purpose. Thus, many of the trips to the commercial facilities adjoining the Pruneyar.d Inn will 2 7be made by motel guests or by others already at the Pruneyard shopping center. Also, many of the motel gu may patronize other shops, restaurants or movie housesests in the Pruneyard shopping center without adding any traffic to the surrounding road system. Net traffic impacts may j be less than what has been calculated. The ITE rates for motels are trips per occupied room. The calculations for the Pruneyard Inn assume full occu- pancy of all rooms. On days when all rooms are not occu- pied, the trip generation will be less. We have made observations of traffic conditions at the driveways serving the Pruneyard at various times. It is our observation that there are no particular problems for traffic entering or exiting the Pruneyard by way of the existing driveways, although there may be short delays for traffic waiting to turn left at various times. Gaps are created in the traffic flow on Campbell Avenue and on Bascom Avenue by the signals at Campbell Avenue/Union Avenue, Bascom Avenue/Campbell Avenue and Bascom Avenue/ Campisi Way, which allows left turns to be made. Delays are most apt to occur at noon time or early afternoon, rather than at peak hours on the adjoining street system. Motel traffic will be nominal at these times of day. Traffic +.mpacts have been calculated for all of the project traffic. Actually, the project is removing 23,000 square feet of potential additional retail shopping space, which would generate roughly the same amount of traffic, as follows: The project will generate 1170 daily trips and 80 peak hour trips as detailed in the trip generation section of this report. 23,000 square feet of retail space would generate whichis the 4same lamount cof daily traffic and le trips and III kmore rpeakps hour traffic than the proposed development. Traffic impacts of the motel development are less than the traffic impacts from the retail shopping space that is being replaced. 3 LE i► , 1 ji;T�� r= _ �IC I I �I� I_I I_I_I i t hI I I I- I_ IJ� t I Rw.� L J1111 IJ i-- I�i-1T1�1Tl�f ...... .....w `�` i .9 Mar FOST moon �11�LY[Mi ._ ._ THE „RUNXYARD•INR •••• ''� �r_Mc�• Sri �uMt� nL --. -� ]I a HEDLEY AND STARK, INC. ASSOCIATED ARCHITECTS TELEPHONE (408) 379-7404 October 10, 1986 Mr. Art Kee Planning Director City of Campbell OCT 131986 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, California 95008 CITY ❑F CAMPBELL PEANNING DEPARTMENT Re: Pruneyard Inn MM 86-11 (S 86-03) Dear Sir: I was astonished to learn this morning that your staff was going to recommend a continuance for the project this coming Tuesday evening. I had hoped every- one was aware that that was totally unsatisfactory. The reasons given me verbally by staff were, in my opinion, very minor and easily resolved with just a reasonable attempt on their part to communicate them to me. Ism disappointed that after many years of effort on my part to preserve an image of cooperation and integrity with and to the City that nothing was said to me until that recommendation was formulated and mailed. I The matter of the traffic impact of the change could be easily inferred to j be minor from the statement made in the traffic report we provided in May. However, we are proceeding with all possible haste to have the Traffic Engineer provide'a statement that it still is of little consequence. As to the matter of moving the pedestrian access to the west end of the hotel (seen as a problem by the Architectural Advisor), I will elaborate further on the points of my letter to you of October 6., as follows: 1. We lost the interaction of the shoppers with the hotel lobby because the building code does not really allow glazing or openess along an exit corridor. 2. The service and trash removal traffic from restaurants and stores past the lobby and through the hotel entrance pattern was not desirable, as you can imagine. 3. The omission or removal of the commercial space from the north side of the hotel area and the need for the use of designated parking for the hotel left no need for a shopping center entrance at that particular point. 346 EAST CAMPBELL AVENUE • CAMPBELL. CALIFORNIA 95008 1 � i 4. There are several entrances ,ther than that particular route, all with adjacent and handy parking spaces. S. By moving it to the west er.d through an enclosed covered walkway, the service and trash removal aspects can be relegated to a minor circulation route at times when other shops are not troubled. 6. By containing the lobby within the hotel perimeter we were able to resolve the heating, wind and noise control problems inherent in the previous concept, wherein any time we opened the lobby to the interaction with the public we lost our heat or faced a wind tunnel effect or violated the corridor fire barriers. The foregoing factors, combined with others outlined in my letter of October 6, seem more than adequate to answer the concerns of she Architectural Advisor. I trust Mr. Larson's statement will resolve the matter of the traffic impact. Hopefull,, this will lead to a change in the recommendation from a continuance to an approval. I think the project deserves it. Sincerely, Morris Stark STAFF PROCESS LIST FILE NO. MM 86-11 AGENDA DATE: May 13, 1986 DATE FILED: 4-24-86 FEE: $125 PAID: 4-24-86 SITE ADDRESS: 1875 S. BASCOM AVE. APN NO: 288-4-7, 8 s 9 PROPOSED USE: 94 unit motel ZONING: C-2-s Retail s restaurant space GENERAL PLAN: General Commercial APPLICANT: Morris stark ADDRESS: 346 E. Campbell Ave. Campbell, CA 95008 PHONE NO: 379-7404 ♦ DATE PUBLISHED IN CAMPBELL PRESS: DATE PROPERTY WAS POSTED (IF APPLICABLE): DATE LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT: DATE OF FIRST (PUBLIC) HEARING: CONTINUED TO: / APPROVED DATE: RESOLUTION NO: DENIED DATE: RESOLUTION NO: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY CITY COUNCIL: FINAL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED Copies to: CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 (4081866.2100 Department: Planning June 13, 1986 Mr. Morris Stark Hedley $ Stark, Inc. 346 E. Campbell Ave. Campbell, CA 95008 RE: MM 86-11 (S 86-03) 1875 S. Bascom Ave, Dear Mr. Stark Please be advised that the Planning Commission, at its meeting of .Lune 10, 1986, conditionally approved your proposal (on behalf of 'it. Fred Sahadi) to construct a 94-room inn on a northerly portion of the Pruneyard Shopping Center. The conditions of approval are enclosed. Approval is valid ten days after Planning Commission action (June 20, 1986), and is valid for one year (until June 20, 1987), unless an extension of approval is granted. If you nave questions regarding this approval, Please do not hesitate to contact the Planning Office at 866-2140. Sincerely, ARTH!IR A. KEE PLANNTNG DIRECTOR TIM J. HALEY PLANNER II Id cc: Mr. Fred Sahadi CONDITIONS OF APPRt is 101 86-11/S 86-03 APPLICANT: Sahadi,F. SITE ADDRESS: 1875 S. Bascom Ave. P.C. MTG. June 10, 1986 The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. 1. Revised elevations to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor prior to application for a building permit. 2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in ted on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 3. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $4,000.00 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to appltcation for a building permit. 5. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if boxes are above ground) for approval Planning Director. of the 6. All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. 7. Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are installed. B. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. 9. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. 10. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. 11. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by Planning and Building Departments (Section 21.68.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code). CONDITIONS OF APPRC'7�: MM 86-II/S 86-03 APPLICANT: Sahadi, F. -" SITE ADDRESS: 1875 S. Bascom Ave. Page 2. J 12. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any i1 contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garLage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. 13. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self -closing, doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 14. Noise levels for the interior of residential units shall comply with minimum State (Title 25) and local standards as indicated in the Noise Element of the Campbell General Plan. 1 i 15. The applicant is hereby notified that the property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures shall be secured by having windows bearded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed from the property. Sect. 11.201 6 11.414, 1979 Ed. Uniform Fire Code. PLANNING DEPART IENT j16. Sale of alcoholic beverages is prohibited in the cafe and breakfast room unless a conditional use permit is approved FIRE DEPARTIDSNT 17. Provide an automatic sprinkler system in all areas of the new structure. 18. Provide required occupancy separations between the motel 6 shopping center and the restaurant 6 motel. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUILDING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT No comment at this time. PLANNING COMMISSION 19. At its meeting of June 10, 1986, the Planning Commission approved MM 86-11, and determined that up to 117 parking spaces may be designated for motel use only. IW a 1 MEMORANDUM To M'IN C. gIGGAN Date JIVE 11, 1986 CITY MANAGER From. AIMUR A. KTF PLANNING DIRECTOR S-bi m: ZONING FOR PRIINFYARD SHOPPINr CINITR AND STATUS OF PI8INEYARD INN CITY U° CAWULL DISCUSSION The Zoning for the Pruneyard Shopping Center is C-2-S (General Commercial), with Site approval required for any projects other than minor modifications. There is no requirement for Council actioi unless an appeal of the Planning Commission's action is filed. On Tuesday, June 10, 1986, the Planning Commission approved a medification to a previously plan to allow the construction of a 94-unit hotel. Changes between the previously approved plan (S 86-03) and the current plan (W 86-11) include the following: 1. 1n increase in the number of approved rooms from 79 to 94. 2. The retention of 2,778 sq.ft. of retail space. The enlargement of the size of some of tic rooms of the inn. 4. 'Ile pmvisicn of a breakfast room, sum deck, and spa. S. The const action of a third story to accommodate these additional items. AAK:ld ILA J FVIFV OF CAMN IM 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAM ?BELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 1 (408) 866-2 t 00 Department. PL.uning June 10, 1986 Mr. Fred Sahadi Mr. Morris Stark 1901 S. Bascom Ave., Ste. 900 Hedley 6 Stark Architects Campbell, CA 95008 146 E. Campbell Ave. Campbell, CA 95008 FILE NO: 101 86-11/S 86-03 ADDRESS: 1875 S. Bascom Ave. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Modification to previously approved 79 room inn - Pruneyard Shopping Center SITE 6 ARCHITECTURAL REVIpid APPOINTMENT: Date: Tuesday, June 10, 1986 Time: 11:15 a.m. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: 7:30 pm, Tuesday, June 10, 1986 Please be advised that the Architectural Review Committee of the Campbell Planning Commission will review your plans for a,,proval of the above -referenced project of the appointment time noted above, in the North Wing Conference Room, City Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California, TFn Commdttee Chairman will then make a recommendation a; the regular me ing of the Planning Commission which is held at 7:30 p.m. on the above -referenced date, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California, A copy of the Staff Reporc and recommendation, as well as the agenda for the Planning Commissior, me._,ing is enclosed. It is necessary th a you, or an authorized representative, be present at said Architectural Review Committee me-ting and the Planning Commission meeting. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact the Planning Department at 966-2140. Sincerely, ( (, 1. /-t-"C __ ACTHUR A. KEE -'* - PLANNING DIRECTOR 1d/lj Enclosures draft 5/6/86 PRUNEYARD EXPANSION DATA A roved 23,00 S' retail p 40.4 TE/1,000 SF Proposal 1 46,000 SF * inc. 79 hotel rooms p 10.5 TE/room 1000 SF± restaurant w 56.3 TE/1000 SF TOTAL Pro po salt 11 68,000 SO inc. 94 hotel rooms P 10.5 TE/room 4000 SF± restaurant 56.3 TE/1000 SF 2800 SO retail � 40.4 TE/1000 SF TOTAL E rye HEM B� MAY i. ,; 1986 CITY CIF CAMPBELL PLANNINQ DEPARTMENT = 929 TE - 830 TE = 56 TE 866 TF = 987 TE = 225 TE = 113 TE 1,325 TE The new proposal represents 1 50% increase in traffic generation over the first proposal and a 43% increase in traffic over the previously approved retail usage. This would require a new traffic study and possibly a focused EIR. f V i Y OF (11AM1111E1 1. 7 0 NORTH F I R S T S I R E F. T CAMP CALIFORNIA 85008 14081 866 2100 i Cepanment: planniny May 12, 1986 Mr. Morris Stark Hediey a Stark Architects 346 E. Campbell Ave. Campbell, CA 35008 kE: Pruneyard Inn 1875 S. Bascom I.ve „ Campi-II Our File No. S 86-03 Dvar Mr. Stark: The Public Works Department has informed the Planninu Department that the Proposed revisions to the plans for the Pruneyard Inn will require an analysis of the traffic impacts of this develop- ment. This analysis will need to be comFleted prior to this item bung agendized for the Planning Commission. In discussing this with Public Works Department staff, it was suggested that the applicant retain a licensed traffic engineer to work w.th the Public Works Department in the traffic analysi=. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Bil; Helm.? or Mr. Keith Manley in the Public Works Department. Sincerely, ARTHUR A. KEF PLANNING DIRECTOR PIiILIP d. STAFFORD PRINCIPAL. PLANNER IPjSelj I HEDLEY AND STARK, INC. IN ACTS SSOCIATED ONE SO HID( 08C 379E 740404 DD April 25, 198u CITY OF CAMPBELL -ANNiNr DEPARTMENT Mr. Tim J. Nalev, Planner II Planning Department, City of Campbell 70 North First Street Campbell, Cali f•rnia 95008 Re: fIM 86-11 Pruneyard Inn Dear Mr. Haley: This is in response to your letter of April 23 and I reply as follows: 1. The application form has been submitted to Mr. Sahadi and should be in your hands shortly. 2. The east elevation has been submitted. The west elevation is almost entirely hidden by Grodins and shows nothing that is not consistant with small portions already shown. 3. The breakfast operation is a copy of the Campbell Inn system. It is not open to the public and is a buffet continental breakfast only; fruit, rolls, coffee, etc. It will seat from 50 - 75 guests, although by code it could legally seat 87. The cafe is not to be confused with a restaurant. It will serve (to the public) wine, espresso, coffee, pastries, possibly beer and soft drinks, possibly cheese, possibly some speciality desert. It will seat 30 - 40 although the legal limit may be about So. It's purpose is to create ambience a--d interest for both hotel guests and Pruneyard shoppers, in the form of a "sidewalk cafe"'. 4. Duly noted. Yours truly, Ak�—, Morris Stark 346 EAST CAMPBELL AVENUE • CAMPBELL. CALIFORNIA 95008 r- (Q MEDLEY AND STARK, INC. ASSOCIATED ARCHITECTS TELEPHONE (408) 379-7404 April 24, 1986 CITY OF' CAMPBELL Mr. Arthur Kee, Manning Director "LAN NINo DEPARTMENt City of Campbell 7S North Central Avenue Campbell, California 95008 Subject: The Pruneyard Inn Dear Sir: This is a response to your suggestion that a rationale, for expanding the project from two stories to three, be submitted foi the review of all concerned. i agree and appreciate the suggestion. In the initial stage, I think we saw the project primarily as a solution to the empty, unleasable spaces at the north side of the Pruneyard and the first schematic (the one we hurriedly submitted n F:bruary 211 reflected an attempt to maximize the number of units within the existing structural module. ']'his led to room sizes (24 and 28 foot lengths) which, through subsequent study, wire found to be inconsistAnt with the competitive market sizes and amenities. This led to an additional reflection on just what type of facility would stand on its own in the hotel marketplace. working area or would it be a first clt.'ould it be rust a substitute for a non - ass, highly competitive, vital facility instead. The decision was obvious and all efforts to upgrade were in response to the latter alter.uative. Increasing the room lengths by 33 percent on the ground floor, within the existing C—straints, meant we would lose 19 to 23 rooms on that level so the third story was a solution to replacing them and in a more desirable location than opening on to the prSlic arcade and parking lot. The third floor added only eight feet of height (after adjusting the roof pitch slightly) but allowed the inclusion of upgraded amenities such as the larger rooms, sun deck, suites to rooms ratio, related commercial space, etc., all in a more viable cost package. As you can surmise, the cost of staff salaries, elevators, central circulation and Lobby space, basement, construction start ups, tile roofs, etc. remain comparable for both two story •-d three story solutions, so that increasing the number of rooms from 79 to 94 makes a great positive difference in the income generated versus construction cost ratio. It could be the difference in economic viability. 346 EAST CAMPBELL AVENUE • CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 To illustrate the comparison of the original 14' by 14' rooms and the new 14' x 32' rooms 1 am attaching some study sketches of each. I apologise for the rough format but the timing is a 14tcle early r,,r final drawings. Thanks again and let me know if there are questions, or things we can do, prior to the Architecture and Site Review. Yours truly<`r�'^' G�1 Morris Stark cc: Fred Sahadi PLANNING COYYI•f ipW AP►LIGATION I PLEASE NOTE: STAFF IS REOUIRFD BY STATE LAW TO NOTIFY APPLICANTS OF THE MV.rr, ]Cf . OF THEIR APPLICATIONS. ONLY IMSE APPLICATIONS WHICH ARE F(XM TO BE CCMPLFTE CAN BE POSTM ON A PLANNING COrtfISSION .A(:F/Npq. LATE: 4/18/86 FILE NO: MH Q%b —1 �r PROPERTY LOCATION: rha pri wry ii_ AP\: 4ff17- I - 77 B 1875 N. Bast)m Ave., Campbell Z0':-W: —`------------- APPLICATION: Architectural Approval Ike Permit Planned Development Permit Zone Change G(meral Plan Amendment Variance Other: �� ------_!—C_------__ APPLICANT: Name: Hedlev f Stark Architects Telephone: 379-7404 Address: 346 E. Campbell Avenue City/State: Campbell, k'\ 9500S ----------------- PROPERTY OWNER: NaMe: Fred Sahadi Telephone: 571-0811 Address: I11Q1 S Pn c�nm S 't Onn City/State: Campbell, CA t Zip: 95008 ------------------------------------- I/We the undersigned person(s) having an interest in the above described property hereby make the above application(s) 1I1 accordance with the pto- visions of the Campbell tlnicipal Cade, and I/A'e hereby certify that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of 1 edge and belief. Ly ^ my/our lagw- RFC. N IIjUI\��\l pllYf�'� n DO P 1 e Ap .A.vrr. — MTY OF CAMPSEL �I PLANNING DEPARTMENT p `J 1:rer a ure o._ CITY (IF VANI 11ELL 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAM PBEII, CA, FORNIA 95008 (40 8)8 66-2100 D",t—t Planning April 23, 1986 Morris StarK Hadley and Stark Architects 366 L. Campbell Ave. Campbell, CA .`5008 RE: MM 86-11 1875 S. Bascom Ave. Dear Mr. Stark: The Planning Department has reviewed your application for a modification to the previously approved plans for the Pruneyard Inn and requests the following information to complete this application: 1. A completed application form (signature of property owner). 2. Piovision of oast and west elevations. 3. A description of the breakfast and cafe operation should be provided. The number of seats and an indication of whether the facilities are open to the general public or restricted to hotel guests. 6. A copy of the submitted plans has been referred to the Public Works Department for their comments. A traffic report may be required for this project if, after a review of the proposal, a potential traffic impact is identified. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact the Planning Office. Sincerely, ARTHOR A. KEE PLANNING DIIR'ECTTOR TIM J. HALEY f PLANNER II TJH:lj Ent. -J PLANNING CCNMIm810N APPLICATION PLEASE NOTE: STAFF IS REQUIRED BY STATE LAN' TO WTIFY .APPLICMTS OF 7IIE MWrrMZM OF THEIR APPLICATIONS. ONLY TIDSE APPLICATIONS h7iICH ARE FOIA.n 1p BE CCWLEPE CAN BE POSTED ON A PU NING mPfglscION AGIN DATE: 4/18/8b FILE NO: MH 8 a —11 PWTERTY LOCATION: The Pnup,•l:ar.i APN: 1875 N. Bascom Ace. Camohell gOr�j i•__y APPLICATION: x Architectural .Approval Use Permit Planned Development Permit :one Change General Plan .4mehdment Variance Other: 5 8(v-0!) ------------------------------------- -APPLICANT: Name: 1j, .v t: 5tarA +Ar hit rc Telephone: 3'9-'404 Address: 34b E. Campbell Avenue City/State• Campbell, CA 95008 • _ :ip: PROPERTI' OK gTER Name: Fred Sahadi Telephone: 11 +'1-OS Address: t_rnih City/State: clmphell, r.a Zip, nsnoa ------------------------------------- I/hie the undersigned person(s) having an interest in the above described property hereby make the above application(s) in accordance with the pro- visiolrs of the Campbell Mmicipal Code, and I/A'e hereby certify ;hat the information given herein is tru: and correct to the best of my/our know- ledge and belief. 'N 1 f� ? . ¢ //eliz REC.. Applicant igna to AlMr. Property ,sec rgn htil^c Oate I EIR-1 CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM - TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Date Filed: 4/18/86 GENERAL INFORMATION: I. Name and address of developer or project sponsor: Fred Sahadi, 1091 S. Bascom Ave., Suite 900, Campbell CA 95008 2. Address of project: The Prunevard 1875 S oath Bascom Avenue Assessor's Block and .ot er Book "8. Page 4. F'ar•e1 - 3. Name, address, and telephone number of concerning this project: Person to be contacted Norris Stark, Iledlev L Stark Inc 34t, I. (379-7404) ('vmlbel 11 l•A 950/18 4. Indicate number of the permit application for the project to which this form pertains: _ 5. List and uescribe any ocher related permits and ocher public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies 6. Existing zoning district. _ 7. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): dl un!t ci,t rl PROJECT DESCRIPTION (ATTACHED ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY) B. Site size. \h,_It 1 1/2 acres of the 28.8 acre site. 9. Squar- footage. About 64.1100 sq. ft. of the total 1,254,000. 10. Ntmiber of floors of construction. 3 . Basement 11. Amount of off-street parking provided. 94 . 10 employees - 104 12. Attach plans. 13. Proposed scheduling. Start construction July 1986 Complete construction Julv 1937 14. Associated projects. 15. Anticipated incremental development, single phase 1 of 3 pages L -- 16. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. 04 ,notrl unit. 17. If commercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities. t sue,il :ate and ,on,e snail :onuur rr ial areas are 11� 18. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. Not applicable. 19. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employ- ment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. Not applicable. 20. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required. \ot applic:d,lr. Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects" Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). Yes No 21. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes or hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours. 22. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or Public lands or roads. 23. Change in pattern, sc_tle or character of general area of project. 24. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 25. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. 26. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water q•:ality or quanity, or alteration of existing drain- age patterns. 27. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. 28. Site on filled land or on slope of 10% or more. 29. Use of disposal of potentially hazardous materials, 30. such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives. Substantial change in demand for municipal services 3 1. (police, fire, water, eewage, etc.) Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.) _ 32. Relationship to a lar er project series of roje Pn tic into the existing haract rothe rl' unelard Comm rci .1 [S. comp leX. 2 of 3 pages I h•• W_ .:.... -- 33. E 34. The existing site consists of 4 or 5 stores whose leases are expired or about to expire plus several roofed but empty modules which have not been leased since the center opened. They are all located on the north side of the Pruneyard between Grodins and Food Villa. The site has been developed for several years as a regional shopping center and office tower complex. This specific project has only one exposure to adjacent property, a two story multi -family residential complex about 110 feet to the north at the closest point. The remainder of the commercial complex is a rambling, one and two story Spanish tile roofed development, vaguely early california ranch styi•. The existing courtyard and plaza on the south side of the new motel will be largely retained with some re -development and planting. The new building itself is generally three story with a typical roof height of about 38 feet but does contain a central tower about 58 feet in height with a 46 foot high atrium behind it. The color scheme of the new addition will blend in with the existing complex. The roof tile will be salvaged existing tile where it is exposed to public view on the north and east sides and will be matched as closely as possible cn the south or courtyard sides. The cement plaster will be a light complementary graved tan with wood eaves and posts stained a weathered gray brown. Wrought iron "balcony" railings will be matte black. The canvas awning is intended to be more intense, gry colors to signfy an old world market place and may range in the yellow -orange -terra Gotta shades. I CITY OF CAMPBELL 1875 S. BASCOM MM 86-11 2 of 3 hMJ ,2T ,- ,:I ,- /V 7- �GG�1G i ,kV,C 7- i 1 I 1 1 RESHWED APR, N - CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT .' ! -•— - --- - -- tic -' , '" _.. _ � .. ---- - • ---- - I M "fir C D c1 L v 6E, o . s Aj,, si r �.iDG !T I 1 2 3 4 5 1 61 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11I t 2 13� 141 151 �-L4 v G t �. r1C e_ -t- �t SL1 / l � ^• 20ry'2; .::ter{ + i !.-, _c.�. �-�s":�Et•.�u`s��� ��J--t r�_ �P r..� `:� rf 's.-tt..�: tC r'r--er.�� C� ��} �`Z. T C, •_r et . t-f C a't 2 3 4 5 1 61 FOMI 1 1 2 3 4. 5 6 7 S 9 10 11 12 13 141 151 ENVIRONMENTAL SF.TTIN, 33. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topoEraphy, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on ,.he site, and the use of the structures. Attach photc,F,i-ris of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be acceptea. 34. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photo- grapbs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepte,l. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that she statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ¢ i3 A-6 Date,' Z' gnature -- Tor -- 3 of 3 pages RECEIPT - CITY OF CAMPS, C%AAMMPBELL., CALIF Oki NiA NAME-__- I�t•� '` . / C/ /' ,- o - --� �--> >Uu FOR REVENUE ACCOUNT NO 33 I FUND NUMBER I/'— ❑ C ct, —Y OROER CASH []Aik AMWNL TNIS \[C[I►T &&.86 2M MUST [E MACMINF i A t t VALIDATED AND f'r �nQ�` �j�� f SIGNED WOW Rft-ft %%[.MA 5462 Thak Y.' CITY Ok CAMPBELL l^- CITIZENCOPY TO: CITY CLERK PLEASE COLLECT AND RECEIPT FOR THE FOLLOWING MONIES ITEM PLANNING FILE NO.: tAH �—I( ADDRESS: (rj-11J AMOUNT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0-1 acres $1,000.00 1-5 acres i,300.00 5+ acres 2.000.00 ' ZONE CHANGE — 0-1 acres 900.00 1-5 acres 1,000.00 5+ acres 1,500.60 TEXT AMENDMENT 400.00 _ PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 0-2 acres 1.000.00 2-5 acres 1,300.00 5+ acres 1,500.00 _ (Modifications of Approval) 250.00 (Revised Development Schedule) 150.00 USE PERMIT Garage Conversions, Occupancy Requirement w/o Development Plans, Liquor Licenses, Secondary Dwelltng 11nits, Interim Tone 350.00 All Other Use Permits 1,000.00 (Modifications or Amendments) 125.00 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL 0-10,000 s.f. of construction 500.00 10.000-75,000 s.f. of construction 750.00 _ 75,000+ s.f. of construction 1,000.00 If no construction associated w/ project 500.00 (Modifications) 125.00 (Extensions of Approval) 75.00 VARIANCES — Single Family Residence 250.00 All others 430.00 _ SIGN PERMITS Permits - Minimum of $40 or I of estimated valuation 40.00 Penalty for not securing a permit 40.00 _ OTHER �1,� TOTAL S 1 7 S LO NAME fTEat�s"( t �l'nta^�t IhG PHONE 379--f7fof ADDRESS .34, FOR RECEIPT N0. CITY CLERK MIOUNT PAID ONLY RECEIVED BY CITY OF CAMPBELL 1875 S. BASCOM MM. 86-11 3 of 3 HO uI-Z WA I- -CIA 1AA -Ob �-fIg`S% Pcc>M 51-LE 1 -r-7 21 1 1 111 1 131 1 1 1 1 1 1 141 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 51 61 I d I T 31 '4175 '61 '7 '81 '91 T101 '111 1121 113i 111 '151 goo AND C) yet C AL 54 8b ci u-) 0.( A 77 1 1 1 1 -F -11-21 1131 11 1 -1- 51 2 1 '31 1 ' 1 41 ' I ' I ' 1 '51 81 1 1 2TI 31 41 51 1 61 1 7T SM9 liol 11T 41 1 a i �MMEKG/AL 1 3 4 o ....... r.."i:.T,.. *�\ 1E Y�%BL/G WA/Tin,G M /O 1_ �h 9 1 Gq�C W j11 I 21 3 1 5 61 ® I 11 21 3 4 5 8 7 8 9 10 tt 12 13 111 151