Loading...
S 84-11, File 1CITY OF CAMPBELL 2105 S BASCOM S 84-11 FILE #1 1 of 4 3O 6J _ N .f 1 c Jai I t ► 1 1 1 t 1 I ' 1 � r v _i ,lJ 240' --- - ----- - . 402' �, 213' �— - --- - - � 31 I I I I � I�t -,I I I w a J 1 -fit+---- - - -+- --- i N ' I ii 1 I i i_l _ F 1 I I I I• I 1 I 1 I u� I ❑ 2 PARKING LEVELS _ 1 33 Iu ---,I-I--4 i4-j1� 117 _ 17' F , _ HC , ,• I Li HC-X6Yc' �L HC I I 1�TT 3f �T7�'Tr�TTr T�' 'TTI� BMI r� 3 4 5 8 7 9 10 11 12 'I 111 551 '-- r ;KAP.. - _R 1!7 101 _x 256 235 -1 2 EX IST. PALM TREES USE PERMi1 f_co� o8 ADNlOYFD BY THi �IANWNCi COMMISSION ON _ RESOLUTION NO. 2'L P. ARENUR A. KEE, SECRET ARYI�A (CITY OF C;AMrM1c;, Sj&gqrtp "S" APPROVAL OF THE PLANE OF (j I z U OU a Z a � W W i n V U z W W Z W �x i H VM O =_� g7<W O= C I t- F'Em" M proom � r• I —Na. 60" 1 HABEEN rRANTEO 8Y THE PLANNING - MISSION OF THE CI'cY OF CAMPBELL. f URNIAAGGT THE REGULAP MEETING HELI. THE Z4& DAY OFkw�—i 19.A!K S:.OJI'. TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: SLE ATTACHED LETTER il� 44 V� gilt - JOB NUMBER:F14-04 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE OF ISSUE: AUG.IC, 19E4 REVISIONS: SHEET TITLE :aiTE PLAN ,;Ty L.- L.AN , "LANNING OCPAR-n•„ N_ ALE: I'•4C' C' SHEET No.: I 1'-1 L n i _ yir'_C 1 ifAL c 'T, r �'...__ -- —lw- ---- — -- '------- - - - -- - - -- - - -- - - - - . . . - _ __ _ ...- .YID .. A _ . -- - \ ��tq"" 1 N . n �. _l.. i�� ���y -- i ^A lK{�. - •_�'; 9F _. '� -y� ..,� - 15�. '4` •� "•'•F�( , 1, '. .�i 1F �1jVF�.9 ' Il 1� i. �p,• ~ ,,��" .,Y � � -'-! WY� 4 �.4 h �7 r.._. I � t �N 1>1 C. ,Y I y� Yb Sw,� � � N_ .� t {J•-� _ �u ,�� E' LI-� 0 'A7 a Q� �� (SOUTH BASCOM AVE.) 2r 3 41 51I Fl BMI I tl 21 3I :� 51 6► �� B� 9 ,D „� ,21 131 ,:I 151 PARKIN:, I �MP�r E SANS4ii4 RIGHT DARK RED ACC ENT STRIP - -BLUE-GREEN REFLECTIVE c�LA�S - DARK GREEN ALUMINUM MULLION L 141 pF�4� �s , U 1 z aU Q Lu H W C7 � Z yWj oc Lu t i r W Z ¢ Y �$ W � Pi � x- Za Z.��N O Z c� Z g ~�J go<W o i a a 0 �Ht�H JOB NUMBER: C4-04 DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE OF ISSUE: A G. 10, 19 - a REVISIONS: SHEET TITLE: LLEVATIr N�,_. I SCALE:I"= C" 1 SHEET No.: PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 8, 1986 OW S 84-11 Continued appeal of the Planning UP 84-08 Director's decision denying the Lincoln Prooercy Co. applicant's request to modify the approved building elevations to permit a patterned horizontal treatment in lieu of a colored granite veneer accent band on property known as 2105 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoniag District. Commissioner Perrine reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval of a green painted stripe as an accent to the building. Mr. Kee reported that Staff is in agreement with the recommendation of the Site Committee. M/S: Perrine, Olszewski - That the Planning Commission approve a modification to the approved building elevations allowing a green painted stripe a-, accent on the office building at 2105 S. Bascom Ave. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). r a t w`�f��ilewca a:�,- , . . ,.. ...- ., e,u.,�.r,:w....rar,.,,.+�.�+.w..........-�---• a�Faw ,a I MEMORANDUM 0" ITEM NO. A CITY OF CAMPBE To. SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL Cwt MAY 23, 1987 REVIF.'d C0141ITTFE From_ PLANNING STAFF LIGHTING PLAN - 6-MONTH REVIEW Subject. S 84-11 - 2105 S. BAS CON AVE. --------------------------------------------------------- At it's meeting of December 10, 1985 the Planning Commission expressed a concern regarding possible effects of parking lot lights on adjacent residences for the office proiect located at 2105 S. Bascom Ave. - Lincoln Court. At this time, Staff has received no complaints regarding the lighting. An oral presentation will be made at the Site Review meeting. ld ITEM NO. C PIN MEMORANDUM CITY OF CAMPB=LL To -1v- Site and Architecturai Review Committee O°rr May 9, 1986 From: planning Staff Subject, parking lot lighting - 6 month review 2105 S. Bascom Ave. (S 84-11) STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval. I j STAFF DISCUSSION At its meeting of February 19, 1985, the Site and Architectural Review Committee conditionally approved the lighting of the parking area for this office. This approval was subject to a six month review of the lighting by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee at that time had expressed a concern regarding the height of the light standards. The project has been completed for six months at this time, consequently a review of this matter is before the Committee. Staff has not received any complaints regarding, the glare from this lighting and is consequently recommending its approval. /ij LAI I ' , f "'l�✓ ITEM NO. 7 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 8, 1986 S 84-11 Continued appeal of the Planning Director's decision UP 84-08 denying the applicant's request to modify the ap- proved building elevations to permit a patterned horizontal treatment in lieu of a colored granite veneer accent band on property known as 2105 S. Bascom Ave, In a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. That the Planning Commission consider the recommendation of the Site and Architectural Review Committee and make a decision on this request. STAFF DISCUSSION This item was continued from the Planning Commission meeting of February 25, 1986, so that the applicant could present an illustrative example of a color blue/green band on this office building. This example will be painted on April 4, 1986 so that it may be reviewed by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission consider the recommendation of the Site and ARchitectural Review Committee and make a decision regarding the accent treatment on this office building. A copy of the previous Staff Report is attached. OPN ITEM NO. 15 STAFF COMMENT SHEET - PLANNING COWISSION MEETING OF DECEMBER 10, 1985 S 84-11 Appeal of the Planning Director's decision denying UP 84-08 the applicant's request to modify the approved building elevations to aPatterned horizontal treatment in lieu of a colored graniteveneer accent band on property known as 2105 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. STPF'F RECO?MNDATION That the Planning Commission deny the applicant's request. STAFF DISCUSSION At its meeting of January 8, 1985the 'n ing Commission approved the elevations of the three story office b.i. •g located on the subject property. The approved elevations indicated the use of a granite veneer material as an horizontal accent band or, the building facade. The glass fiber reinforced concrete panels which were shown for wall materials were also accented by minor steps in the panels. The developer, subsequently, has chosen to modify this wall treatment as described in the attached letter. The Architectural Advisor and Staff have reviewed the requested elimination of the color horizontal bands and the replacement of these bands by a vertical rib pattern. It is Staff's recommendation that a color band provides a more effective relief to the massiveness of bullding, consequently, Staff is recommending this that the proposed modffiLatlon be denied. JORGE DE QUESADA. INC. ARCHITECTS November 22, 1985. Mr. Tim Haley City of Campbell Planning Dept. 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 Re: Lincoln Court Campbell Office Building 2105 S. Bascom Avenue Job #84-04 Ile request a modification to the exterior finish of the previously approved office building project at 2105 S. Bascom Avenue by Lincoln Property Co. At the Owner's request we would like to substitute an integral vertical rib Pattern banding for the originally selected red band shown during the permit process. The ribbed banding is the same co]or as the GFRC paneling and provides a subtle patterning at the horizontal band. Ile feel that this substitution provides a more refined architectural design for the facade, with the interplay of the green glass and the white GFRC panels. This provides an interesting contrast of color and textures pleasing to the eye without having the addition of the red band. We hope that you will concur with this change and approve a modification to the original building design as presented for permit. Sincerely. OP. CD Daniel R. Ortiz HEM NOV 2 2 M5 CITY 13F CAMPOEL PLAM141"0 OLrA1 rMCKV 000k E CAMPBELL VE -50 n. PCL PC, 10 107. M)c'Ar' !P OR 70 IY 4 il O'JC "�l ILAr CT ru 47 W� per PM PC, a le TV AV dF as 11L11( 9? IL PLANNING COMMISSION • FF9 RUARY 25, 1986 MISCELLANEOUS S 84-11 Continued appeal of the Planning UP 84-08 Director's decision denying the Lincoln Property Co. applicant's request to modify the approved building elevations to permit a patterned horizontal treatment in lieu of a colored granite veneer accent band on property known as 2105 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Mr. Kee reported that Staff is recommending continuance in that no new information has beer. received. Commissioner Perrine brief./ explained that the delay is due to tLe request of the Site Committee in asking for a sample of the proposed veneer accent to he temporarily placed on the building. M/S: Perrine, Fairbanks - That S 84-11/UP 84-08 be continued to the meeting of April 8, 1986 at the applicant's request. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). • n ITEM NO. 3 STAFF COMMENT SHEET - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 25, 1986 S 84-11 Continued appeal of the Planning Director's decision UP 84-08 denying the applicant's request to modify the approved building elevations to permit a patterned horizontal treatment in lieu of a colored granite veneer accent band on property known as 2105 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission continue the consideration of this item to its meeting of April 8, 1986. STAFF DISCUSSION This item was continued from the Planning Commission meeting of January 28, 1986, so that the applicant could provide an alternative solution to the red colored accent band originally approved for this office building. As of this writing, Staff has not received new information regarding this item, consequently, a continuance of this application is recommended. Staff is recommending a continuance of this item to the Planning Commission meeting of April 8, 1986. PLANNING COMMISSION • ^ JANUARY 28, 1986 S 8C-11 Continued appeal of the Planning UP 84-08 Dir,ctor's decision denying the Linc-�ln Property Co. applicant's request to modify the approved building elevations to permit a patterned horizontal treatment in lieu of a colored granite veneer arcent band on property known as 2105 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Perrine reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee had asked that granite be installed, or the band be painted; and, the Committee is of the opinion that a more subdued color, such as on the windows, would be more appropriate (rather than the red which was originally presented). The applicant is willing to work with the City. M/S: Dickson, Fairbanks - That S 84-11/UP 84-08 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of February 25, 1986. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-0). j K- ITEM NO. 14 STAFF COMMENT SHEET - PLANNING COMMISSION MELTING OF JANUARY 28, 1986 S 84-11 Continued appeal of the Planning Director's decision UP 84-08 denying the applicant's request to modify the ap- proved building elevations to permit a patterned horizontal treatment in lieu cf a colored granite veneer accent band on property known as 2105 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission consider the recommendation of the Site and Architectural Review Committee and make a decision on this request. STAFF DISCUSSION This item was continued from the Planning Commission meeting of December 10, 1985, so that the applicant could present an example of the buildng paint stripe to the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The applicant has placed an illustrative color band on the west elevation of the building at this time for the Committee's review. A copy of the previous Staff Comment Sheet is attached for the Commission's review. Staff is recommending that the Commission consider the information presented in the previous Staff Report and the recommendation from the Site and Architectural Review Committee and nake a decision regarding this request. ITEM NO. 15 STAFF COMMENT SHEET - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF DECEMBER 10, 1985 S 84-11 Appeal of the Planning Director's decision denying UP 84-08 the applicant's request to modify the approved building elevations to permit a patterned horizontal treatment in lieu of a colored granite veneer accent band on property known as 2105 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission deny the applicant's request. STAFF DISCUSSION At its meeting of January 8, 1985, the Planning Commission approved the elevations of the three story office building located on the subject property. Tloe approved elevations indicated the use of a granite veneer material as an horizontal accent band on the building facade. The glass fiber reinforced concrete panels which were shown for wall materials were also accented by minor steps in the panels. The developer, subsequently, has chosen to modify this wall treatment as described in the attached letter. The Architectural Advisor and Staff have reviewed the requested elimination of the color horizontal bands and the repla=ement of these bands by a vertical rih pattern. It is Scaff's recommendation that a color band provides a more effective relief to the massiveness of this building, consequently, Staff is recommending that the proposed modification be denied. O JORGE DE QUESADA. INC. ARCHITECTS November 22, 1985. Mr. Tian Haley City of Campbell Planning Dept. 7.5 :forth Central Avenue Campbel., CA 95008 Re: Lincoln Court Campbell Office Building 2105 S. Bascom Avenue Job #64-04 Dear Tim: Ile request a modification to the exterior finish of the previously approved uffice building project at 2105 S. Bascom Avenue by Lincoln Property Co. At the Owner's request we would like to substitute an integral vertical rib pattern banding for the originally selected red band shown during the permit process. The ribbed banding is the same color as the GFRC paneling and Provides a subtle patterning at the horizontal band. Ue feel that this subs'i ation provides a more refined architectural design fo. the facade, with the interplay of the green glass and the white GFFC panels. This provides an interesting contrast of color and textures pleasing to the eye without having the addition of the red band. We hope that you will concur with this change and approve a modification to the original building design as presented for permit. Sincerely. � -D.p, Daniel P.. Ortiz D DRO: cw Np� 2 w 1985 C1TM or CAMPBEL.L CC: Burch Boone nµNlNo oVMTN�I�T Bob Hopper Roger Oser Hugh Banks 1700 MONTUOMERY STREET SAN FRANCISCO. CALIFORNIA 941 1 1 141 SI 434 3690 1 _ _ •,WI ITEM NO. 15 STAFF COMMENT SHEET - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF DECEMBER 10, 1985 S 84-11 Appeal of the Planring Director's decision denying UP 84-08 the applicant's request to modify the approved building elevations to permit a patterned horizontal treatment in lieu of a colored granite veneer accent band on property known as 2105 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission deny the applicant's request. STAFF DISCUSSION At its meeting, of January 8, 1985, the Planning Commission approved the elevations of the three story office building located on the subject property. The approved elevations indicated the use of a granite veneer material as an horizontal accent band on the building facade. The glass fiber reinforced concrete panels which were shown for wall materials were also accented by minor ste;.s in the panels. The developer, subsequently, has chosen to modify this wail treatment as described in the attached letter. The Architectural Advisor and Staff have reviewed the requested elimination of the color horizontal bands and the replacement of these baa t ey a vertical rib pattern. It is Staff's recommendation that a color band provides a more effective relief to the massiveness of this building, consequently, Staff is recommending that the proposed modification be denied. ,Avg- JORGE DE QUESADA, INC. ARCHITECTS November 22, 1985. Mr. Tim Haley City of Campbell Planning Dept. 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 Re: Lincoln CourL Campbell Office Building 2105 S. Bascom Avenue Job #84-04 Dear Tim: Ile request a modification to the exterior finish of the previously approved office building project at 2105 S. Bascom Avenue by Lincoln Property Co. At the Owner's request we would like to substitute an integral vertical rib pattern banding for the originally selected red band shown during the permit process. The ribbed banding is the same color as the GFRC paneling and provides a subtle patterning at the horizontal band. We feel that this substitution provides a more refined architectural design for the facade, with the interplay of the green glass and the white GFRC panels. This provides an interesting contrast of color and textures pleasing to the eye without having the addition of the red band. We hope that you will concur with this change and approve a modification to the original building design as presented for permit. Sincerely, Daniel RECUVED NOVDRO:cw N�"" 1985 CC: Burch Boone CITY OF CAMPOELL Bob Hopper PLANNING PLPART 41 Pw Roger Oser Hugh Banks 17M MONTGOMERY STREET SAN FRANC.'aCO. CALIFORNIA 94I 11 I41-31 434 3690 1• J ,Avg- JORGE DE QUESADA, INC. ARCHITECTS November 22, 1985. Mr. Tim Haley City of Campbell Planning Dept. 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 Re: Lincoln CourL Campbell Office Building 2105 S. Bascom Avenue Job #84-04 Dear Tim: Ile request a modification to the exterior finish of the previously approved office building project at 2105 S. Bascom Avenue by Lincoln Property Co. At the Owner's request we would like to substitute an integral vertical rib pattern banding for the originally selected red band shown during the permit process. The ribbed banding is the same color as the GFRC paneling and provides a subtle patterning at the horizontal band. We feel that this substitution provides a more refined architectural design for the facade, with the interplay of the green glass and the white GFRC panels. This provides an interesting contrast of color and textures pleasing to the eye without having the addition of the red band. We hope that you will concur with this change and approve a modification to the original building design as presented for permit. Sincerely, Daniel RECUVED NOVDRO:cw N�"" 1985 CC: Burch Boone CITY OF CAMPOELL Bob Hopper PLANNING PLPART 41 Pw Roger Oser Hugh Banks 17M MONTGOMERY STREET SAN FRANC.'aCO. CALIFORNIA 94I 11 I41-31 434 3690 1• J PLANNING COWISSION hfC DEC"ER 10, 1985 5 84-11 Appeal of the Planning Director's UP 84-08 decision denying tht applicant's Lincoln Property Co. request to modify the approved building elevations to permit a patterned horizontal treatment in lieu of a colored granite veneer accent band on property known as 2105 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. MSS: Kasolas, Christ - That S 84-11/!)P 84-08 be continued to the Planninq Commission meeting of January 14, 1986. Motior carried unanimously (7-0-0). ITFM NO. C MEMORANDUM CITY OF CAMPBELL To: Site and Architectural Review Committee Date: February 8, 1985 From,: Planning Staff subject: Landscaping, Fencing and Lighting Plan (S 84-11 & UP 84-08) 2105 S. Bascom Ave. ----------------------------------------------------------- STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval of the landscaping and irrigation plan. STAFF DISCUSSION At its previous meeting of January 8, 1985, the Site and Architectural Review Committee continued the consideration of these plans so that the items discussed on the attached memorandum could be addressed. The applicant has submitted revised plans which address the concerns regarding the landscaping and irrigation plans. Consequently, Staff is recommending approval of these plans. As of this writing Staff has not received plans addressing concerns for the fencing and lighting plan. ITEM REFERRED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION At its meeting of January 8, 1985, the Planning Commission referred the height of the parking structure and the screening of the trash enclosure to the committee. These items are addressed in the submitted plans. I1721 NO. C MEMORANDUM CITY OF CAMVBELL To: SITE AND ARCHITECTl1RAL Date: January 4, 1985 REVIEW COMK17rEE From: PLANNING DEPARTMEMr Subject: LANDSCAPING, IRRIGATION, FENCING AND LIGHTING PLANS UP 84-08, S 84-11, - 2105 S. BASCOM AVE. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the Site and Architectural Review Committee continue consideration of these plans so that the items discussed below may he addressed. STAFF DISCUSSION At its meeting of August 28, 1984 the Planning Commission approved the ,replication of Mr. Burch Boone for a three-story office building on the referenced property. Conditions 3 and 4 of the approval required the applicant to submit the following plans for the Site Committee's approval: 1. Landscaping Plan. 2. Irrigation Plan. 3. Fencing Plan, and 4. Lighting Plan. Landscaping Plan The submitted landscaping plan provides detail of pavement treatment throughout the project as well as landscaping materials. Staff finds the submitted plans generally acceptable, however, would recommend that the following items be addressed with revisions to the presented landscaping plan: 1. Increase the amount of lawn areas along the Michael Drive frontage to give project a more residential appearance. 2. Distribute planting areas within parking garage more evenly. 3. Provide additional bollards at easterly end of emergency access road. 4. Provide some variety of shrub heights adjacent to handicapped parking spaces. 5. Provide detail of raised planter area along north side of the office building. 6. Clarify screening of utility transformer at south elevation of building. UP 84-08 S 84-11 Site Review Committee 2- January 8, 1985 7. Consider the use alternative pavement materials for entrance from Bascom Ave. frontage, and 8. Provide planting materials on building balconies. Irrigation Plans The irrigation plans are considered generally acceptable. The proposed system should incorporate street trees and the planting strip along the Michael Drive frontage. Fencing Plan The submitted fencing plan indicates the provision of a 7' block wall adjacent to the existing residential uses. The submitted plan, however, does not pprovide any detail of this fencing. Further details should provide th.a fol'.owing information: 1. Detail of fencing material and color. 2. How the proposed fence will be stepped down nearing the street frontages. Lighting Plan The submitted lighting plan indicates the provision of lighting for the driveway along the northerly side of the building and for the garage structure. The parking garage lighting is provided by 20' twin headed poles on the second level of the garage and 8' lighting fixtures within the garage. Staff cannot determine from the submitted plan if this lighting will adversely affect the adjact,it residential properties. To address this concern, Staff is recommending that a lighting diagram be provided which illustrates the light distribution from these fixtures. e*� l� 1 ow Ong PUBLIC HEARING HELD BEFORE PLANNING ODWISSION ON JULY 10, 1984. ODNSIDERA- TION BY CITY O)UNCIL ON JULY 17, 1984 AUCUST 21, 1984. REFERRED TO PLANNING COWISSION FOR ACTION ON AUGUST 28, 1984. RES, NO 2288 ADOPTED APPROVING OONS'FRUCITON OF 3-S"nRY OFFICE BLDG. (VOTE: 3-7.2Tp ./o....... �er !ee w o t esr i �� rvwu t• -_-__ noe.vE Pm so. -.-,Two ter • ' tte . , c .cn C PLANNING COhMISSION 0 JANUARY 8, 1985 UP 84-08 Consideration of revised plans S 84-11 for a previously approved office Lincoln Property Co. projec' located on property known as 2105 S. Bascom Ave, in a C-2-S (General Commercial) and R-2-S (Multiple Family Residential) Zoning District. Commissioner Howard reported that this item was before the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The revised parking layout indicates a ratio of 1:250 with the correct back-up distances provided. The details of the parking structure have been completed and address the grade -line con"rns. Mr. Kee noted, at this point, that Staff is of the opinion that some measurements of the grades are still needed. Commissioner Howard continued that the details of the loading and trash enclosure will be coming back to the Site Committee, along with a lighting scheme. Samples of colors and buildings materials have not yet been presented. And, the paving materials have been addressed. Therefore, the Site Committee is recommending approval. There was brief discussion regarding grade measurements. Mr. Kee commented that presented plans were not clear, in Staff's opinion, which results in the recommendation for the submittal of cross sections demonstrating a reduced height in the parking garage, as specified in the Staff Report. Chairman Fairbanks asked if the plans, as presented this evening, address Staff's concerns totally. Mr. Kee stated that Staff would still want the distances clarified. Staff would like to be able to check these distances once constructed, to see that what has been represented to the Commission is what is being constructed in the field. M/S: Howard, Perrine - That the Planning Commission approve the revised plans, subject to the submittal of cross sections demonstrating a reduced height in the parking garage, and with the lighting and trash enclosure plans coming back to the Site Committee for approval. Discussion of Motion Commissioner Dickson -tated that he would be opposing the motion in that he did rot find a parking structure to be harronious with a residential area. tote on Motion Motion carried with a vote of 5-2-0, with Commissioners Dickson and Fairbanks voting "no". ITEM NO. 9 STAFF COMMENT SHEET - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 8, 1985 UP 84-08 Consideration of revised plans for S 84-I1 a previously approved office pro - Lincoln Property Co. ject located on property known as 2105 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) and R-3-S (Multiple Family Residential) Zoning District. STAFF_RECOMMENDATION Approval, subject to the submittal of cross sections demonstrating a reduced height in parking garage. STRFF_DISCUSSION At its meeting of August 28, 1984 the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2288 approving the application of Mr. Burch Boone, on behalf of Lincoln Property Co., for approval of a three-story office building and a related parking structure on the project site. Condition 1 of that approval required the applicant to submit revised plans and elevations addressing the following concerns- -Revised parking layout which indicates the required back-up distance. -Details of parking structure, including a barrier surrounding it, high enough to block headlights from shining on adjacent properties. -Details of loading, trash enclosure, and plaza areas. -Samples of the color and buiding materials. -p plan, indicating paving materiais for the project and turf block for she fire lane along the south property line. The applicant has su,3sequently submitted plans so that these concerns could be addressed. The submitted plans indicate the provision of 481 parking spaces in the proposed parking garages+. The proposed parking results in a parking ratio of 1:250 for the gross square footage of office use. Additionally, the provided parking provides the required back-up distance for a parking space. The plans additionally include details of the parking garage which wars not previously indicated. The plans indicate the construction of a two -level parking structure with the second level being • 04 UP 84-08 S 84-11 —2— January 8, 1985 approximately 518" to 714" above finished grade. A solid concrete railing of 316" is proposed along the perimeter of the parking structure, consequently, the height of the parking structure is 992" to 10•10" above finished grade. Staff expresses a concern regarding the height of this structure in that it was previously shown as 7.6" above grade. Staff is recommending that the applicant provide cross sections details between the garage and neighboring residential properties and also between the garage and Michael Drive se that the previously approved height is illustrated. The revised plans have provided further details for the loading and trash enclosure area for this project. Additionallys details have been provided for the interior courtyard area and the paving material- throughout the project. These details address the informat.on previously requested by Staff. Staff is recommending approval of these plans subject to the revision in the garage design so that a 7.51 maximum height is p•�ovided. w r • 04 PUBLIC BARING HELD BEFORE PLACATING OYMISSION ON JULY 10, 1984. CONSIDERA- TION BY CITY COUNCIL ON JULY 17, 1984 ✓; AUGUST 21, 1984. REFERRED 1O PLANNING CMUSSION FOR ACTION ON AUGUST 28, 1984. RES. NO 2288 ADOPTED APMITNC O NSIRUMON OF 3-SMRY OFFICE BLDG. (VOTE: 3-2-77 s■ w ....... pia 2!0 — — E UMPSELL - . ELL AYE M0 xc -we.}l,fr P Y. Go — � y. MKAMVILLE CT 1z - Iz 10 L SS IO � I A MEMORANDUM To. SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COM6ffTTEE From: PLANNING DEPARTMENT ITIT7 NO. C CITY OF CAMPBELL Date January 4, 1935 Suojwt: LANDSCAPING, IRRIGATION, FENCING AND LIGIITING PLANS UP 84-08, S 84-11 - 2105 S. 134SMI AVE. STAFF RECCfMENDATICN That the Site and Architectural Review Connittee continue ansideration of these plans so that the items discussed below may be add--essed. STAFF DISCUSSION At its meeting of August 28, 1984 the Planning Commission approved the application of Mr. Burch Boone for a three-story office building on the referenced property. Conditions 3 and 4 of the approval required the applicant to submit the following plans for the Site Comr.ittee's approval: 1. Landscaping Plan. 2. Irrigation Plan. 3, Fencing Plan, and 4. Lighting Plan. Landscaping Plan The submitted landscaping plan provides detail of pavtment treatment throughout the project as well as landscaping materials. Staff finds the submitted plans generally acceptable, however, would recommend that the following items be addressed with revisions to the presented landscaping plan: 1. Increase the amount of lawn areas along the Michael Drive frontage to give project a more residential appearance. 2. Distribute plcnting areas within parking garage more evenly. 3. Provide additional bollards at easterly end of emergency access road. 4. Provide some variety of shrub heights adjacent to handicapped parking spaces. 5. Provide detail of raised planter area along north sire of the office building. 6. Clarify screening of utility transformer at south elevation of building. Up 84-08 S 84-11 Site Review Committee -2- January 8, 1985 7. Consider the use alternative pavement materials for entrance from Lascom Ave. frontage, and 8. Provide planting materials on building balconies. Irrigation Plans The irrigation plans are considered generally acceptable. The proposed system should incorporate street trees and the planting strip along the A1ichael Drive frontage. Fencing Plan The submitted fencing plan indicates the provision of a 7' block wall adjacent to the existing residential uses. The submitted pian, however, does not provide any detail of this fencing. Further details should provide the following information: 1. Detail of fencing material and color. 2. How the proposed fence will be stepped down nearing the street frontages. Lighting Plan The sebautted lighting plan indicates the provision of lighting for the driveway 4long the northerly side of the building and for the garage structure. The parking garage lighting is provided by 20' twin headed poles on the second level �f the garage and 8' lighting fixtures within the garage. Staff cannot determine from the submitted plan if this lighting will adversely affect the adjacent residential properties. To address this concern, Staff is recommending that alighting diagram be provided which illustrates the light distribution from these fixtures. *z* 0% 0 �I PUBLIC HEARING HELD BEPOR,: PLANNING . OOWISSION ON JULY 10, 1984. ODNSIDERA- TION BY CITY COUNCIL ON JULY 17, 1984 F, AUGUST 21, 1984. REFERRED M PLANNING COMMISSION FOR ACTION ON AUGUST 28, 1984. RES. NO 228C ADOPTED APPROVING CDNSTRUMON ,,,•„ OF 3-STORY OFFICE BLDG. (VOTE! 3-2-17 ' `" °•` '� RAO 1 l.►w fr LN Los wiorwRus• E GMOSELL - Ir. IYi• r .I AvC .4 t.. 't WYl1 tM1lOrM ICY t{'r'7 - IC I/N IR.1 i rr toc-.r-Y'9� b•:•: t1r .�. � � aa�Rr;t _ tY [[[ 1 e KL sue- v 4 pc MICNACL aj tF ID �rl :-��- • - i+11 I as rc rt t c • 1t .t /tl • MICNA L 7 A.rr_'. N. 1 �K rR L- i ID r i taw/ E jU� 04- 08'�,;., 1 �- RESOLUTION N0. 2288 PLANNING COWISSION After notificati^n and public hearing as specified by law on the application of Mr. Burch Boone, on behalf of Lincoln Property Co., for a Use Permit and approval of plans and elevations to allow the construc- tion of a 3-story office building on property known as 210S S. Bascom Av -iue in a C-2-S (General Commercial) and R-3-S ftltiple Family !tesi- dential) Zoning District, as per application filed in the Planninf; Department on April 9, 1"84, and after presentation by the Planning Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed. UP 34-08/ S 84-11. After due consideration of all evidence presented, the Commission did find as follows: That the est,blishment, maintenance, and operation of the proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of persons re- siding or working in the neighborhood of such use, or be detrimental or injurious to the property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the C`-ty. Based on the above findings, the Planning Commission does hereby grant the requested use permit, subject to the conditions attached here- to as Exhibit A. The applicant is notified as part of this application that he is required to comply with all applicable Codes and/or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California which pertain to this development and are not herein _pecified. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of August 1984 by the following 6 roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Christ, Howard NOES: Commissioners: Fairbanks, Dickson ABSENT: Commissioners: Perrine APPROVED: J. DuWayne Dickson -- ZTiarrman ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee Secretary I ON CONDITIONS Or APPROVAL: UP 84-08/S 84-11 APPLICATION or: Lincoln Property Co. SITE ADDRESS: 2105 S. Bascom Ave. P C vTe: 8/28/84 n/a kevised elevations sad/or site plan to be approved by the Planning Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor, within 30 days of the Planning Commission approval. 1 Revised elevations and/or site plan to be approved by the Planning Commission with- in 30 days of Planning Commission approval. See conditions raider Plan- ning Department for details. 2 Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the a,;,roved plans. 3 Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted 'or approval of the Site & Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to app ication or a building permit. Lighting plan also required. n/a Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigat!on system to be submitted for approval of the Planning Director prior to application for a building permit. 4 Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be submitted for approval of the JU)DDC00faAXJD= prior to applica- tion for bu'Iding permit. Site Committee 5 Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $ 20 000 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parki,ig areas within 3 months of completion o construction; or (2) filr: written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing and strip- ing of parking areas prior to application for a building permit. 6 Applicant to submit a plan, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and scrcening(if boxes are aboveground) for approval of the Planning Director, 7 Applicant to submit a letter, satisfactory to the City Attorney, limiting the use of the property to: 122._cu a383 square feet of office use, -0- square feet of spetive industrial use, and square feet of warehouse use, prior to issuance o a ur _,ng permit. 8 _ All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. i 0 Building occupancy will not be allowed urtil public improvements are installed. -n/a: not applicable to this application. PAGE 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: UP 84-04/S 84-11 APPLICATION OF: Lincoln Property Co. SITE ADDRESS: 2105 S. hascom Ave. The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she i; required to meet the following conditions in accordance with Ordinance of the City of Campbell and Laws of the State of California. A All parking and drivewav areas to be developed in comnliance with Section 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. B Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. C Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and tele- vision cables, etc. D Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by the Building Depart- ment (Sectiun 21.68.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code). E Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, aarbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apart- ment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. F _ Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire De- partment. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self -closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level, and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these container;. G Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City re- quirements for the handicapped. n/a Noise levels for the interior of residential units shall comply with minimum State (Title 25) and local standards as indicated in the Noise Element of the Campbell General Plan. n/a Applicant is hereby notified that he will be required to pay Park Dedication In -Lieu Fee which will be assessed at the time the subdivision map is submitted. STANDARD FIRE HAZARD ABATEMENT COMMENT, The applicant is hereby ratified that the property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures shall be kept secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolish- ed or removed from the property. Sect. 11.201 6 11.414, 1979 Ed. Uniform Fire Code. PAGE 3 CONDITIONS Of APPROVAL: UP 84-04/S 84-11 APPLICATION or: Lincoln Property Co. SITE ADDRESS: 2105 S. Bascom Ave. AIBLIC HORKS DF.PARTNIEN7 11. Constrict an additional southbound lane on the Highway 17 roof -ramp at Hamilton Ave. 1. Construct a free right -turn lane at Hamilton and Bascom Ave. for the northbound to eastbound movement. This will require right-of-way access, street improvements, and signal recisions. J. Construct an additional left turn lane at Bascom G Campbell for the northbound to westbound movement. This will require street improve- ments, island removal and reconstruction on all approaches and new signalization. K. Bond for future median islands from Campbell Ave. to Shadydale on Bascom Ave. Should the City deem that traffic con,'itions require positive channelizatiun within five years of occupancy, the developer will install said islands. L. Provide a storm drainage plan that is satisfactory to the City Fngineer. f M. File a parcel map to combine the three lots. p N. Obtain an excavation permit and poet surety aid pay fee for all work p in the public right-of-way. FIRE DEPARTTISvr 0. Provide automatic sprinkler system for entire office building and lower flevel of parking structure. P. Provide Class I st::ndpipe system in a'.1 required exit stairwells i(UBC 3803 b & c). Q. Provide on -site municipal fire hydrant in rear parking structure area. R. Access roads on all sides of the building shall be posted and designated as fire lanes with parking prohibited. PLANNING DEPAP.=T S. Revised plans as required under Condition 1 shall include the following: Revised parking layout v?hich indicates the required back-up distance. Details of parking structure, including a barrier surrounding it, high enough to block headlights from shining on adjacent properties. Details of loading, trash enclosure, and plaza areas. Samples of the colors and building materials. A plan indicating paving materials for the project and turf block for the fire lane along the south property line. ^ I7M NO. 8 STAFF CM ENT SHEET - PI.A.NINING CLMMISSION WETING OF AUGUST 28, 1984 Referral Referral from the City Council for Site and UP 84-08 Architectural review on property known as S 84-11 2105 S. Bascom Avenue in a C-2-S (General Lincoln Property Commercial) and R-3-S (Multiple Family Residential/High Density Residential) Zoning District. STAFF RE0244D MTION That. the Planning Commission approve the plans and elevations, subject to the attached conditions. STAFF DISCUSSION At its meeting of July 10, 1984 the Planning Co mission considered plans for a 4-story, 140,000 sq.ft. office building on this site. A motion to approve the project failed on a 3-3-1 vote, with Commissioners Fairbanks, Christ, and Dickson voting "no", and Commissioner Howard being absent. The Commission then took action to refer this item to the City Council. The Council continued the ite at its meeting of July 17, 1984, and prior to the August 21, 1984 meeting, tie applicant submitted revised plans indicating a 3-story office building, and a reduction in the square footage to 122,383 sq.ft. At its meeting of August 21, 1984 the Council granted conceptual approval of the proj—t with a referral to the Planning Commission for site and architectural approval. Below is a description of the revised proposal. The applicant is proposing to construct a 3-story, 122,383 sq.ft. office building. The elevations and site layout are almost the same as the previous 4-story proposal. The building is setback 25' from Bascom Ave. The parking structure to the rear of the building maintains a 15' setback from Michael Drive and a 20' setback from the adjacent residential develop- ment to the north. The parking str. tore will be of concrete construction with the first level depressed s -)roximately 4'.. and the second level approximately 4' above grade. Staff is recommending a solid barrier around the structure to block headlights shining onto adjacent properties. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed parking structure should have minimal impact on adjacent properties if proper landscaping bdiffers are provided and specific attention is provided regarding parking area light- ing and screening. These concerns are addressed in the conditions of approval. The proposed building is of contemporary design. Building materials are shown ns an off-white concrete wall with a sandblasted finish and a blue/ green reflective glass for glazing treatment. The windows are accented with dark green aluminum mullion and a dark red accent stripe. Referral 'UP 84-08 S 84-11 Lincoln Property -2- August 28, 1984 Access to the project has been indicated solely from the Bascom Avenue frontage. A driveway to the north and south of the building provides access to the rear of the property. Staff is of the opinion that the sole access onto Bascom Avenue is necessary to preserve the residential character of Michael Drive. The applicant has provided two alternative parking layouts. One provides 491 parking spaces (48% compact) resulting in a parking ratio of 1:250. The second provides 544 parking spaces (57% compact) resulting in a parking ratio of 1:225. The 1:250 layout also provides 7 openings between the 2 parking levels for the planting of trees. As previously recommended, Staff is of the opinion that the 1:250 ratio would provide adequate parking for a development of this size. This ratio would be consistent with previous Commission approvals of larger projects. The Architectural Advisor is of the opinion that the building design is of high quality. He would like to see samples of the building materials and colors and paving materials. Staff recommends carrying out the front balcony corner elements around to the side of the Building and to the west elevations. Sta.',' has the following additional concern regarding the project, which should be addressed in revised plans: 1. The back-up distance for some of the parking spaces do not meet code. This concern can be addressed in revised plans. The Public Works Department traffic mitigation measures are listed in the Conditions of Approval under "Public Works". • z a CITY of Curt= A le" CITY COIAiCIWADVISORY CONNISSION/STAFF REFERRAL FORM Tp: J. DuWryne Dicksun, Chairman Planning canmission cc: A. Kee, Planning Director FROM: Mayor Ralph Doetsch INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE OF THIS FORK: This Fors should be wtilised whenever a referral Is made from one elected or advisory body to the City Council or Advisory Commission or City Manager. The Information required to complete the fors should be provided by the initiator at the time the referral is made. The staff advisor will be responsible for completing the form for review and signature by the Mayor or Commission Chairman. AUUM: (A specific summary of the seforral.) RE: Planning Comnission Referral - Linooln Property Conpany, 2015 S. Bascem Avenue - UP 84-08, S 84-11• The City Council, at its regular meeting of 8/21/84, reviewed the revised plans for construction of a 3-story building on the subject property. The City Council referred the revised plans to the Planning Commission for review and action. ACTION REQUESTED: _ INFORWITION ONLY REVIEW I REOONIM ACTION TAKE ACTION COMMENTS: (if aocessary) RESPONSE maquam syt or out Mots as action shamid be no. If so date is Specified. that aboold be SMio ato 8/28i84 Planning Commission Meeting pate: 8/23/84 Mayof•Ralph Doetsch/by: Anne Coyne, City Clerk Signature Qkyor or Advisory ss as chairmAn) CONDITIONS Or APPROVAL: UP 84-08/S 84-11 APPLICATION or: Lincoln Property Co. SITE ADDRESS: 2105 S. Bascom Ave. P C NTO: 8/28/84 n a Revised elevations and/or site plan to be approved by the Planning Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor, within 30 days of the Planning Commission approval. 1 Revised elevations and/or site plan to be approved by the '— Planning Commission with - In 30 ays of Planning Com:arssion approval. See conditions under Plan- ning Department for details. 2 Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 3 Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted for approval of the Site & Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to application for a building permit. Lighting plan also required. n/a Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted for approval of the Planning Director prior to application for a building permit. 4 Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be submitted for approval of the MODMIXIDOMM prior to applica- tion for building permit. Site Committee 5 Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $ 20 000 to insure landscap,',g, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing and strip- ing of parking areas prior to application for a building permit. 6 Applicant to submit a plan, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening(if boxes are aboveground) for approval of the Planning Director. 7 Applicant to submit a letter, satisfactory to the City Attorney, .limiting the use of the property to: 122 383 square feet of office use, -0- square feet of specu ative industrial use, and square feet of warehouse use, prior to issuance ooT a�uiiUing permit. 8 All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. 9 Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are ',stalled. •n/a: not applicable to this application. f l� 1 A � PAGE 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: UP 84-04/S 84-11 APPLICATION OF: Lincoln Property Co. SITE ADDRESS: 2105 S. Bascom Ave. The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with Ordinance of the City of Campbell and Laws of the State of California. A _ All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Section 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete ;urbs or bumper guards. B Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. C Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and tele- vision cables, etc. D Sign application to be submitted in accordance with Drovisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by the Building Depart- ment (Section 21.68.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code). E Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apart- ment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. P Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire De- partment. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self -closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level, and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclos::re area to service these containers. G Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City re- quirements for the handicapped. n/a Noise levels for the interior of residential units shall comply with minimum State (Title 25) and local standards as indicated in the Noise Element of the Campbell General Plan. n/a Applicant is hereby notified that he will be required to pay Park Dedication In -Lieu Fee which will be assessed at the time the subdivision map is submitted. STANDARD FIRE HAZARD ABATEMENT COMMENT: The applicant is hereby notified that the property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures shall be kept secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolish- ed or removed from the property. Sect. 11.201 & 11.414, 1979 Ed. Uniform Fire Code. PAGE 3 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: UP 84-04/S 84-11 APPLICATION OF: Lincoln Property Co. SITE ADDRESS: 2105 S. Bascom Ave. PHBLIC WORKS DEPARTTIn' H. Construct an additional southbound lane on the Highway 17 roof -ramp at Hamilton Ave. I. Construct a free right -turn lane at Hamilton and Bascom Ave. for the northbound to eastbound movement. This will require right-of-way access, street improvements, and signal revisions. J. Construct an additional left turn lane at Bascom & Campbell for the northbound to westbound movement. This will require street improve- ments, island removal and reconstruction on all approaches and new signalization. K. Bond for future median islands from Campbell Ave. to Shadydale on Bascom Ave. Should the City deem that traffic conditions require positive channelization witi.h `ive years of occupancy, the developer will install said islands. L. Provide a storm drainage plan that is satisfactory to the City Engineer. M. File a parcel map to combine the three lots. N. Obtain an excavation permit, and post surety and pay fee for all work in the public right-of-way. FIRE DEPARTMENT 0. Provide automatic sprinkler system for entire office building and lower level of parking structure. P. Provide Class I standpipe system in all required exit stairwells (UBC 3803 b $ c). Q. Provide on -site municipal fire hydrant in rear parking structure area. R. Access roads on all sides of the building shall be posted and designated as fire lanes with parking prohibited. PLANNING DEPARTMENT S. Revised plans as required under Condition 1 shall inclu& the following: Revised parking layout which indicates the required back-up distance. - Details of parking structure, including a barrier surrounding it, high enough to block headlights from shining on adjacent properties. Detail_ of loading, trash enclosure, and plaza areas. Samples of the colors and building materials. A plan indicating paving materials for the project and turf block for the fire lane along the south property line. Fencing plan to indicate restricted access to turf stone area and details of walls along residential properties. rAwt404 AV -.r- CAMPBELL m &W*20— -7� ..95D id'i, Iry Ul p SIL MICNAEL q72 ?fit Duckw-YILLC CT 47 SO Z 06 AC of T aw La • FkL- M I C H Ap— .. to Ar A7 I -Raw 06 CITY COUNC11. -4UGUSf Z1, 19f,-1 %ws--'-,tiao &-.. 6799 - This is a resolution authorizing execution o1 release authorizing exxution of agrement for installation of street lnproveoents of release of agree- 2105 South Basom Avenue - Baker Trailer Sales meat for installation of street improve- ments - 2165 South Baeoon Avenue - Baker 'hailer Sales r ad; CITY OF CAMPBELL 2105 S BASCOM S 84--11 2 of 4 FIDE #1 a M up 84-08 Deferred item - Planning Commission Referral - S 84-11 Lincoln Property Company - 2015 S. Bascom Ave. Lincoln Property STAFF REODhP ENMATIONS Ia. That the City Council refer the revised plans proposing a 3-story building (112,383 gross sq.ft. of floor area) to the Planning Commission and Staff for Site and Arr'iitectural review; and b. That the Planning Cawassion forward its recommendations back to the Council at the earliest possible date; or 2a. That the City Council refer the revised plans, if determined to be generally acceptable by the (7ouncil, back to the Planning Commission for review and action. STAFF DISCUSSION This item was continued from the meeting of July 17, 1984 in order that residents in the area could he notified that this application was being considered by the City council. In addition, the continuance was also to allow the applicant the opportunity to consider some of the issues and concerns that had been raised regarding the project. On August 10, 1984 Staff received revised plans indicating a 3-story building with a gross floor area of 122,383 sq.ft. The original submittal proposed a 4-story building having a gross floor area of 140,000 sq.ft. Since the Planning Commission and Staff have not had an opportunity to review these plans. Staff is recommending that they be referred back to the Planning Commission and Staff for Site and Architectural review. Staff is also re- commending that the revisions be re-a.gendized for consideration by the C-ty Ccxmcil at the earliest possible date. Another alternative, as recommended in 2a., would provide the Council the opportunity to indicate conditions it would find acceptable for this project, and to have those concerns addressed by the Pinning Commission n its review of the revised plans. Typically, Site and Architectural applications or Use Permit applications are not referred to the Council for acti however, because of the sensitivity of this project, it was the reques i the Planning Commission, Staff, and the applicant that it be referred to "�e Council. If it is the Coumcil's desire, once the concerns are known and :onditi.ois express- ed, the Planning Commission has the authority to take action on this project without it being referred back to the Council. PREPARED 8-. Planning Staff AOVpA August 21, 1984 CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 21, 1984 DEFERFD ITEW Planning Camdssion Referral - Lincoln Property C--fpany - 2015 S. Bascom Avenue - W 84-08, S 84-11 (Cont'd. 7/1:/84) 0% r Planning Director Bee - Report dated August 21, 1984. W. Bee stated that this item was continued from the meeting of July 17, 1984 in order that residents in the area could be notified that this application was being considered by the City Council, and to allow the applicant to address some of the issues and ooncerns that had been raised regarding the project. Engineering Manager Relms addressed some of the questions raised regarding mitigating measures. Acting City Attorney Duckworth advised the Council that it is possible for the City Council to mandate a certain amount of money to be set aside to mitigate what is perceived to be traffic problems with the development of this project. City Attorney Duckworth advised further that the only caveat in doing so is that these funds are to be used specifically to mitigate traffic problem -1C" I arising from the development of this project and must be returned to the develope if not used. City Manager Schilling stated that this would be a significant change from existing policy. Mr. Schilling stated that if tije Council wished to retain some flexibility in how these funds might be spent in the future on other impravenents vAiich would also benefit this i7-.oject as has use. suggested, it would be his recommendation that the developer initially be requir d tc pay for the improvements that have been identified ane. that a caveat be put in so that if the City identified another improvement which, in its opinion, will be of equal benefit to the project to mitigate the traffic impa�,t, but of greater impart to the City, then the developer would be expected to contribute an amount no greater than the amount that would have been necessary to do the identified improve- ment. Following discvssior., Mayor Doetsch asked if anyone in the audience wished to be heard on this matter. Garnetta Annatle, 951 Dry Creels Road, Campbell, appeared before the Ca ncil on behalf of herself and the Cambrian Village Haneowners Association, and expressed cnncerns regarding thi=_: project, citing traffic as a major Problem. John Figuer-)a, 52 Michael Drive, Campbell appeared before the Council and spoke against the project. Mr. Figueroa stated that the parking structure does not conform to City ordinance and is not a p.-mi,3sible use. City Attorney Duckworth advised that the parking structure 1s a related, permissible use and does coufonm to City ordinance. Burch Boone, applicant on behalf of Lincoln Property Company, appeared before th. Council to answer any questions. A representative of Antbony Gu=ardo & Associates, Inc., Architects, 836 Montgomery Street, San Francisco, appeared before the Council and spoke regarding the proposed landscape plan and parking structure . Discussion followed regarding the applicant's need to have a decision on this project by August 31st. Ls. &,one indicated his concern that, if referred to the Planning Camnission, the vote might end in a tie. -1]- L 1 I The Council indicated their willingness to call a special meeting in that event so that the matter would be resolved by August 31st. M/S: Ashworth, Kotowski - that the City Council refer the revised plans, which are generally acceptable to the Council, to the Planning Cc „-fission for review and action, and ..hat the Council tentatively schedule a meeting for August 29th, 4:30 p.m., should the Planning C,Mrdssion action result in a tie vote. Notion adopted unanimously. I CITY COLNCIL JULY 17, 1984 Planning Commission Referral - Lincoln Property Company - 2015 S. Bascom Avenue - UP 84-08, S 84-11 0 Principal Planner Stafford - Report dated July 17, 1984. Vice May-)r Ashworth expressed his concerns that this item was referred from the Planning Commission without adequate public hearing notice. City Attorney Dempster advised that this item did not require a public hearing, and was referred to the Cite Council because of the 3-3 Planning Commission vote. Mayor Doetsch asxed if anyone :.n the audience wished to be heard on the application of Lincoln Property Company, UP 84-08, S 84-11. Burch Boone, Lincoln Property Company, 101 Lincoln Centre Drive, Foster City, appeared before the Council and spoke in favor of the development. Mr. Boone stated tnat he has been working with staff for over three and one-half months and has attempted to address all issues regarding traffic and mitigating .neasures. John Wilson, traffic consultant representing Wilson - Porter Engineering, San Francisco, appeared before the Council and addressed the issue of mitigating measures. Mr. Wilson stated that the intersections of Bascom and Campbell Avenues, Bascom and Hamilton Avenues, and the Highway 17 southbound off -ramp at Salmar Avenue were studied and the mitigating measures were developed as a result. Following discussion, Engineering Manager Helms appeared before the Council and explained how the mitigating measures would impact the traffic. - 7 - a Gary Black, Bartcn-Aschman Associates, 99 Almaden Boulevard, San Jose, appeared before the Council and spoke regarding the request for the parking variance. Burch Boone, Lincoln Property Company, presented 6 letters and a petition containing 42 signatures of surrounding businesses and property owners in support of the project. Garnetta J. Annable, 951 Dry Creek Road, Campbeli, appeared before the Council on behalf of herself and the Cambrian Village Homeowners Association, and spoke against the project citing traffic, and storm drain problems. Pat Figueroa, 52 Michael Drive, Campbell., appeared before the Council and spoke against the variance because of the impact to the neighborhood and adjacent residents. Mrs. Figueroa requested that a 7 ft. fence be added as a condition of approval if the Council were to approve the variance. David Oswald, owner of property located at West Valley Drive and Union Avenue, appeared before the Council and spoke in favor of the project. Sam Magnano, 1824 Kirkmont Drive, San Jose, appeared before the Council and spoke in favor of the project. Ray Clark, 325 April Way, Campbell, appeared before the Council and spoke against the project stating that this project was too large for this piece of property. Warren Banet, 916 Apricot, Campbell, appeared oefore the Cow,cil and expressed concerns regarding the traffic impact on Apricot Avenue. Russell Levitt- Earthmetrics, 659 Cowan Road, Burlingame, appeared before the Council and spoke regarding the traffic impact this project would have. Joseph Gemma, 2160 S. Bascom Avenue, Campbell, appeared before the Council a.id spoke in favor of the project. Wayne Mitsunaga, 1518 Via Carcion, San Jose, appeared before the Council and expressed concerns regarding the project stating that the project was too large for this particular site. Andre Walewski, 125 B Redding Road, Campbell, appeared before the Council and spoke in favor of the project. Mayor Doetsch expresse' his concerns regarding the impact this project would have on Bascom Avenue, which is already heavily congested. 8 L- J Engineering Manager Helms responded to discussion pertaining to tr.ffic movements or. Bascom Avenue. Mr. Helms stated that the two-way left hand turn lane on Bascom Avenue should be adequate; however, staff will monitor the tuning movements and if it appears to be a problem, -he applicant wa.uld be req.,ired to construct measuzis to restrict the turning movements. Councilman Kutowski pointed out that the Council sho.:ld define exactly what "high rise" for the City of Campbell is. Burch Boone, applicant, stated that the property is under a contract which expires at the end of July so he would like a decision by that time. Mr. Boone requested the Council to call a special meeting between now and the end L` July; however, if that would be impossible, Mr. bone indicated he would be willing to wait until August when a full Council would be present. Following discussion, it was determined that a full Council would not be present until the August 21, 1984 City Council Meeting, and Mr. Boone indicated his approval of this date. Ml : Podgorsek, Kctowski - to continue consideration. of a`1s matter to the August 21, 1984 City Council Meeting the request of the applicant, Birch Boone on behalf of Lincoln Property Company. Motion adopted by a 4-1-0 vote, Councilman Chamberlin voting "No". REFERRAL FORM CI TV COUNCIL/AFIVISORV COI.TIISSI'_YH/STAFF TO CITY MWIL FROM PLANNING C(MMTSSION INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE OF THIS FORM THIS FORM SHOULD BE UTILIZED RHENEVER A REFERRAL IS MADE FROM ONE ELECTED OR ADVISORY BODY TO THE CITY COUNCIL OR ADVISORY COMMISSION OR CITY MANAGER- THE INFORMATION RtUU1RE0 TO COMPLETE THIS FORM SHOULD DE PROVIDED BY THE INITIATOR AT THE TIME THE REPERNAL IS MADE• THE STAFF ADVISOR WILL BE RES- IBLE FOR COMPLETING THE FORM FOR REVIEW AND SIGNATURE BY THE MAYOR OR COMMISSION CHAI NIIAN. SUBJECT (A SPECIFIC SUMMARY OF THE REFERRAL) At its meeting of July 10, 1494 the Planning Commission referred the application of Mr. Burch Boone, on behalf of Lincoln Property Co., for approval of a Conditional Use Permit and a Site and Architectural application to allow the construction of a 4-story office building of approximately 140,000 sq.ft. on property known as 2015 S. Bascom Ave. (currently Baker Trailer Sales). ACTION REQUESTED ❑ INFORMATION ONLY ❑ REVIEW AND ® TARE ACTION RECOMMEND ACTION OMWICLNTS (IF NECESSARY) The Commission is referring this applica- tion to the City Council for the following reasons: (1) Commission's vote of 3-3-1. (2) Applicant's request. (3) Staff recommendation. RESPONSE REQUESTED BY (BY WHAT DATE THE ACTION SHOULD BE OOMPLETED. IF NO DATE IS SPECIFIED, THAT SHOULD BE INDICATED.) DATE 7/11/84 SIrNATn+E J. DuWayne Dickson, Chairman MAYOR R ADVISORY GOMMIB ION CHAIRMAN _1 -s UP 84-08 Referral from Planning Commission - Lincoln Property Co., S 84-11 Mr. Burch Boone - Conditional Use Permit and Site B Archi- tectural application - 4-story office building - 2015 S. Bascom Ave C-2-S (General Commercial) $ R-3-S (Multiple PLANNING CCMNISSIO14 RE MTION: That the City Council review this app ication, 'iO toe action as it deems appropriate. STAFF RECD?`TENDATION: Approval,subject to attached conditions. DISCUSSION The applicant is proposing the construction of a 4-story office building of approximately 14 0, 000 sq.ft., and a related two -level parking structure which would accommodate 553 parking spaces. The project site is currently used as a trailer sales business which would be removed with the development of this proposal. A converted residential build- ing which is listed on Campbell's survey of potentially historic buildings would also be removed. Removal of this building was reviewed by the Historic Preserva- tion Board at its meeting of June 27, 1984. The site combines 3 parcels of land with an approximate square footage of 184,000 sq.ft. The front portion of the project, having frontage along Bascom Avenue is zoned C-2-S (General Commercial) and has a depth of approximately 240 ft. The remainder of the project, to the Michael Drive frontage, is zoned R-3-S (Multiple Family Residential). The applicant is requesting approval of a Use Permit to allow the :onstrLr_.iot of parking facilities on the residentially zoned portion of the project site. The proposed parkimp, structure maintains a 15' setback from Michael Drive, and a 20' setback frme adjacent residential developments along the sides of the project. The structure will be of a concrete construction, with the first level depressed (below grade) approximately 4' and the second level approximately 4' above grade. The protective railings and barriers will be approximately 7' above grade. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed parking structure should have minimal impact on adjacent properties if proper landscaping buffers are provided and specific attention is provided regarding parking area lighting and screening. These concerns are addressed in the conditions of approval. The proposed office building is a 4-story structure with a contemporary design. Building materials are shown as off-white concrete with a sand -blasted finish, and a blue/green reflective glass Fir glazing treatment. Windows are accented with dark green aluminum mullions and an accent strip of dark red. PREPARED By' Planning Staff AO�mM July 17, 1984 UP 84-08 a S 84-11 -2- July 17, 1984 The Bascom Avenue and parking structure elevations have proposed balconies which provide relief to the building facade. The entrance to the office building is at the northwest corner of the structure near the parking faci- lities. Access to the project has been proposed solely from time Bascom Avenue frontage. 1Vxn driveways to the north and south of the office building provide accessibility to the rear parking area. Staff is of the opinion that access restricted to the Bascom Avenue frontage is necessary to preserve the residential character of Michael Drive. Staff does express a concern that the pedestrian circulation on -site be studied further, in that vehicle and pedestrian circulation are not well separated at this time. The applicant has provided 560 parking spaces (330 standard, 222 compact, 8 handicapped) for this project, resulting in a parking ratio of 1:250. Chapter 21.50 of the Zoning Ordinance indicates that parking should be provided at a ratio of 1:225 for office uses. The Planning Commission, however, may approve lesser parking when the applicant has demonstrated that less parking is warranted. Staff is of the opinion that due to the scale of the proposed project the requested parking ratio is acceptable. Approval of a parking ratio of 1:250 would be consistent with previoiu Planning Commission approvals of larger projects. The Architectural Advisor is of the opinion that the building design is well done. He does suggest that further study be done of the accent treatment and the way the bands meet the glass. Staff is of the opinion that the project is conceptually acceptable and is recomnendi,ig its approval subject to the submittal of revised plans fot the approval of the Planning Commission. Revised plans should address the following concerns: 1. Details of parking structure, loading and trash enclosure area, and plaza area. 2. Further study of the proposed accent bands on the building. 3. Better separation and clarification of pedestrian circulation on site. 4. Provision of more landscaping along the southern portion of the parking stricture. At its meeting of Tuly 10, 1984 the Planning Grmission heard testimony regarding the presented Taft Environmental Impact Report for this pro- ject, and took action to certify the EIR as complete (vote: 4-2-1, with Commissioners Fairbanks and Dickson voting "no", and Commissioner Howard being absent). After public hearing regarding the Conditional Use Permit and the Site and Architectural application for this proposed development, the Planning, Commission motion to approve the project failed on a 3-3-1 vote, with Commissioners Fairbanks, Christ and Dickson voting "no, and Ca!missioner Howard being absent. R IMP 84-08 S 84-11 -3- July 17, 1984 The Cmmmissioa then took action to refer this item to the City Council because of the 3-3 vote, as well as at the applicant's request. p} Comments from the Commission regarding this project, from the meeting of July 10, 1984, are attached for the Council's review. Also attached for the Council's information is a copy of the Draft EIR. I x x x R fi "- .Ilk&, 7 Gly PLRNklNG DfPA.irEfSJT PLANNING COWUSSION MEETING OF JULY 10, 1984 COR44- 5 REGARDING UP 84-08/S 84-11 APPLTC'TTON OF: LINCOLN PROPERTY CO. 2105 S. BASCOM AVE. After closing of the public hearing on the above -referenced project, the Commission requested the following comments to be forwarded to the City Council: Chairman Dickson noted his concerns regarding the requested variance for parking; he felt the building footprint was out of line for this area and that the structure is out of place being a 4-story. He felt the building should be less imposing. Commissioner Fairbanks noted that she found the building and the plans most attractive; however, for this site and this City she felt the project was way too dense. She felt that the parking use was not compatible with the residential area, and is adverse to removing residentially zoned property from the rosters to become a parking structure. Commissioner Christ noted his opposition to the project. He felt that the project Eras too large, and that future develop- ments are going to have to be scaled down in order to consider the emulative effect. He added that he would like to see this particular property developed; however, this project was too large for this area. Commissioner Campos stated that he was in favor of the project. The current use has been deteriorating, and the area is in need of significant improvement. The building is very attractive and will provide jobs for people in the area. He felt the project was aesthetically pleasing and would significantly improve this area. Regarding the parking, Commissioner Campos noted that the presented analyses support the ratio. Commissioner Perrine spoke in favor of the project, stating that he was impressed with the mitigating measures conditioned by the Public Works Staff. He noted that he would like 'a see an 8' concrete wall and a review of the parking situate. n within one year of occupancy. Commissioner Kasolas notes that there was a philosophical issue present regarding the size of this project. He felt that the Commission should consider that the traffic iF with us, and there is net much that can be done about it. The position the City has taken is mitigation at the expense of the developers. fie spoke regarding the jobs that will be created by this project, noting that more and more people are trying to work closer to home --which would reduce the traffic problems. The traffic congestion is one of the reasons why businesses are trying to move to this end of the valley. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL : UP 84-08 & S �4-11 APPLICATION OF: L1nColn Property Co. SITE ADDRESS: 210S S. Bascom Ave. P C KTG: ).117-�4 N/A Revised elevations and/or site plan to be approved by the Flannin _ Director upon recommendation )f the Architectural Advisor, wit m 30 days of the Planning Commi;sion approval. 1 Revised elevations and/or site plan to be approved by the S-i-te, -& A+clutect+lral-Review LoimFitaee and/pr the Planning Commisstonwtth- in 30 days of Planning commission approval. 2 Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. _3 Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted for approval of the Site & Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to application for a building permit. (Additionally, lighting N/A plan., Landscaping plan indicating type Lnd size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted for approval of the Plannino Director prior to application for a building permit. 4 — Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be submitted for approval of the Site and Architectural Review Committee prior to application for building permit. _S Applicant to it r (1) post a faithful _ Z� 0�� performance bond in the amount of $ to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas wi— tFTn 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing and strip- ing of parking areas prior to application for a building permit. 6_ Applicant to submit a plan, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer) bores, indicating the location of the boxes and screcning(if boxes are aboveground) for approval of the Planning Director. 7 Applicant to submit a letter, satisfactory to the City Attorney, limiting the use of the property to: 140,000 square feet of office use, ---- square feet of speculati,•e industrial use, and square feet of warehouse use, prior to issuance of a FOM Ting permit. 8 All mechanical equipment oil roofs and all utility meters to be scraened as approved by the Planning Director. 9 Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are installed. *n/a: not applicable to this application. PACE 2 a CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: UP 84 08 tl S 84 11 APPLICATION OF: Lincoln Property Co. SITE ADDRESS: 210S S. Bascom Ave. The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is required N to meet the following conditions in accordance with Ordinance of the City of Campbell and Laws of the Stato of California. _A 411 parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Section 21.50 of the Campbell. Municipal Code. All parviiig spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper ouards. _ B Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. C Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and tele- vision cables, etc. D Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions o' the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by the Building Depart- ment (Section 21.68.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code). E Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, oarbaae, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apart- ment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. F Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire De- partment. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closinq doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level, and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. G Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City re- quirements for the handicapp-d. N/A Noise levels for the interior of residential units shall comply with minimum State (Title 25) and local standards as indicated in the Noise Element of the Campbell General Plan. N/A - - Applicant is hereby notified that he will be required to pay Park Dedication In -Lieu Fee which will be assessed at the time the subdivision map is submitted. STANDARD FIRE HAZARD ABATEMENT COMMENT, The applicant is hereby notified that the property is to be ma+,.tained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures shall be kept secured by having windows boarded up and doers sealed shut, or be demolish- ed or removed from the property. Sect. 71.201 6 11.414, 1979 Ed. Uniform Fire Code. .J PAGE 3 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: UP 84-08 1, s 84 II APPLICATION OF: Lincoln Property Co. S1TE ADDRESS: 210S S. Bascom Ave. Pl1BLIC WORKS i)EI'i'. 11. Construct an additional S/B lane on the Highway 17 oft -ramp at Hamilton Ave. 1. Construct a free right turn lane at ilanulton F, Bascom for the .N/B to E/B movement. This will require right-ot-way access, street improvements, and signal revisions. J. Construct an additional left turn lane at Bascom F, Campbell for the N/B to W/B movement. This will require street improvements, island removal and reconstruction on all approaches and new signalization. K. Bond for future median islands from Campbell Ave. to Shady Dale on Bascom Ave. Should the city deem that trafiic conditions required positive chan- nelization within five years of occupancy, the developer will install said islands. L. Provide a storm drainage plan that is satisfactory to the City Engineer. M. File a parcel map 'o combine the three lots. N. Obtain an excavation permit and post surety and pay fee for all work in the public right-of-way-. FIRE DEPARTMENT 0. Provide sprinkler system in office building and lower level of parking structure. P. Provide on -site fire hydrants for parking structures. Q. Designation of fire lane around building. R. Provide 2A:IOBC fire extinguishers. The applicant is notified that he/she shall comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. ri< N � E CAMPBELL -(. (C AVE i ron F.Y. 500 r-1 95. Fl. 110 KL rW j Ic sir x(TI i f A 1 - TSB. � < OT[([ !<• n � w F O � KL �--- 1`0-''os•.. MICNA DR . YaT[r xn141 70 Al 0VCANVILLE q "• ^� S. _ f T��• 67 / 10 �06 AC MET a• P 11 rC L. t La LO ITIA<x[T 1� • MIC HEEL (Y DR .M:a . i L_ K 76� IV Ito 1 97 {1 �mt a tun TII'Mt A 1 1 O °0 rI L- R J PLANN � cOWISSION a JULY 10, 1984 x x x UP 84-08 Public hearing to consider the application of Mr. S 84-11 Burch Boone, on behalf of Lincoln Property Co., Lincoln Property for approval of plans and elevations to allow the constriction of a 4-story office building on pro- perty known as 2105 S. Bascom Ave., in a C-2-S (General Commercial) and R-3-S (Multiple Family Residential) Zoning District. Commissioner Perrine reported that this item was before the Site and Archi- tectural Review Committee. One concern addressed was the emergency access on Michael Orive. The plan indicates a concrete block pathway with grass which would allow the Fire Department access if necessary. The Architectural Advisor expressed a concern with the building facade detail. In general, the Committee liked what they saw, and is recommending approval subject to the detailed plans coming back to the Commission within 30 days for final approval. W. Stafford further reviewed the project for the Commission, stating that Staff is recommending approval, subject to attached conditions, and that the Planning Commission forward this application to tht City Council for its review. Mr. Helms reviewed Condi*ions H-N, noting that there is an impact at the Hamilton/Salmar intersection and Staff is of the opinion that an appropriate mitigation measure is the addition of one lane which would allow an exclusive thru-lane down Salmar. In response to a question from Commissioner Fairbanks regarding the historic significance of the existing structure on -site, Mr. Stafford indicated that the structure has been reviewed by the Historic Preservation Board who found no historic significance. Chairman Dickson opened the public hearing and invited anyone in the audience to speak for or against this item. Mrs. Annable, 951 Dry Creek Rd., stated that she would like to see an office building on this site; however, she has a problem with the parking variance. Additionally, she spoke in favor of a reduction in the size of the building, perhaps making it 3 stories; and, she expressed concerns regarding traffic circulation, noting that access to Michael Drive would improve circulation and keep traffic off Apricot Avenue. Mr. Burch Roane, applicant, presented an aerial photo and slides of the site. f a -12- Mr. Dan Ortiz, Architect, reviewed t,, oroject for the Commission, noting the project will be approximately 140,000 sq.ft. with 136,000 sq.ft. in adjusted gross floor area; and, with 574 parking spaces provided, which will bring the parking ratio down to 1:237. btr. Ortiz also reviewed the plans for the parking structure. Mr. Paul Lettieri, Landscape Architect, reviewed the landscape plans for the project, noting that there will be a large amount of Screening around the project to protect the residential area. The interior atrium will be provided with a tropical type of plantings; ther, will be several types of flowering trees; the concrete -block emergency access path with be covered with turf -cloth; the two large palm trees, as well as existing pines, will be retained; and a row of redwood trees are proposed along the resiaential property line. btr. Gary Black, Barton-Asc man Associates, spoke regarding the parking ratios provided, indicating that surveys taken by their company show that the provided parking is adequate for this development; and, they would recommend a compact ratio of 60%. btr. Boone presented a table representing parking ratios. He noted that the developer is not asking the Commission to allow maximum usage on this site, but rather to consider the parking ratio of 1:250. Mr. Boone pre- sented information to correlate this parking ratio. Mr. Marvin Wiks, Metro Parking, San Francisco, spoke on methodology for down -scaling parking spaces to facilitate more compact cars and improving efficiency. btr. Hal Clarke, 168 Michael Dr., stated that when he purchased his property this site was indicated by the City for residential use. There ;s a 6' fence indicated; however, the p rking structure will be above -grade, which does not provide privacy for his property. Mr. Clarke contiraed that the emergency lane will create traffic problems across Michael Prive. He asked what would buffer Michael Drive firm this property, lnd what would stop employees from this project from parking on Michael Drive. Mr. John Figueroa, property owner of 52 Michael Drive, stated that he was completely opposed to granting of a variance which would allow residentially zoned property to be used for parking; he cited sa;ety of residents in the area; housing impact; privacy of his tenants; security of the office building; undesirable uses of the parkin!+ structure when office not in use; noise; air pollution; and lack of satisfactory setba_ks. btr. Figueroa asked that if the project is anproved, the following conditions be imposed: grade level to stay the same• where it borders the Prvneyard Apartments; 8' fence be installed alon; interior perimeter of the project; parking lot be closed at night; night patrolling to restrict pedestrian traffic; closed circuit monitoring of parking area. Mr. Stafford noted, for the Commission's information, that parking is an allowable use in an R-3 zone under the -Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Boone stated that the developer could respond to Mr. Figuero's concerns and enuld be willing to work with him to resolve any problems. L_ J A -13- Commissioner Perrin pointed out that the plans indicate a solid wall on the second floor of the parking stricture so that headlights will not penetrate to the residential area. Mr. Wayne Mi.sunaga stated that this was another high density proposal, he did not feel the traffic has been properly mitigated. ,he sewage problems are not discussed, the visual impact is not discussed, and he felt the project should be down -sized. Mr. Joseph Gemma, 2160 S. Bascom Ave., spoke in favor of the project. He felt that the project was beautiful, that the property was zoned for commercial and should be used as such, that Bascom Avenue can handle the traffic, and that the City could use such a nice development. WS: Campos, Perrine - That the public hearing on UP 84-08 be closed. Motion carried unanimously. M/S: Campos, Kasolas - That the Plann_ng Commission adopt a resolution approving UP 84-08, subject to conditions listed in the Staff Comment Sheet. Discussion Chairman Dickson stated his concern with the variance for parking; and,the size of the building footprint for this area. He felt that a 4-story structure would be out of place in this location. Commission: Fairbanks stated that she found the building and the plans most attractive; however, for this place and this City, she felt it was too dense. She stated that s:.e did not find the parking compatible with a residential area, and would be adverse to taking residential property off the General Plan to become a parking structure. Commissioner Christ stated that he is opposed to the project, in that he felt it was too large. He added that he would like to see this pro- perty developed, but with a smaller scaled building. Commissioner Campos stated that he is in favor of the project. Baker Trailer Sales has been d?teriorating very badly, and this area is in need of signifi- cant improvement. This project is very attractive and will provide jobs for people in the area, as well as being a significant improvement for the area. With regard to the parking ratio, he felt that sufficient information has been presented by consultaets to indicate that the ratio will work. Commissioner Perrine spoke in favor of the project, stating that he is very impressed with the list the Public Wbrks Department has drawn up as miti- gating measures. He noted that he would like to add an 8' concrete fence and a review of the larking situation within one year of completion of the project. Commissioner Kasolas spoke in favor of the project, noting that there is not much that can be done about the traffic gcing through the City. What Staff is trying to do is mitigate the impacts at the developers expense. He continued that more jobs in the City will allow residents to work closer to home, thereby reducing traffic problems. -14- Vote on Motion Motion to adopt a resolution approving UP 84-08, with addition of conditions: (1) construct an 8' concrete fence; and (Z) review parking situa- tion within one year of project completion. Motion failed with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine, Campos NOES: Commissioners: Christ, Fairbanks, Dickson ABSENT: Commissioners: Howard WS: Fairbanks, Perrine - That UP 84-08 be forward to the City Council due to the tie vote, and at the applicant's request. Motion carried unanimously. aOn ITF24 NO. 11 STAFF CMTM SHEET - PLANNING COMMISSION METING JULY 10, 1984 UP 84-08 Public hearing to consider the application of 1�r. Burch S 84-1.1 Boone on behalf of Lincoln Property Co. No. 1055 Limited for approval of plans and elevations to allow the construc- tion of a 4-story office building on property known as 2105 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) and R-3-S (%ltiple Family Residential/High Density Residential) Zoning District. STAFF RECObfffNWTION Approval, subject to the attached conditions, and that the Planning Comnission forward this application to the City Council for its review. STAFF DISCUSSION The applicant is proposing the construction of a four story office building of approximately 140,000 sm are feet and a related two -level parking structure which would accomodate SE'l _.g spaces. The project site currentl; ' used as a trailer sales business which would be removed with the developnxn� ;f this proposal. A converted residential building which is listed on Campbell':: survey of potentially historic buildings would also be removed. Removal of this building was reviewed by the Historic Pre- servation Board at its meeting of June 27, 1984. The site combines three parcels of land with an approximate square footage of 184,000 sq. ft. The front portion of the project having frontage along Bascom Ave. in zoned C-2-S (General Commercial) and has a depth of approximately 240 feet. The remainder of the project to the Michael Dr. frontage is zoned R-3-S (Multiple Family Residential). The applicant is requesting approval of a use permit to allow the construction of parking facilities as a transitional use on the residentially zoned portion of the project site. The proposed parking structure maintains a 15' setback from Michael Drive and a 20' setback from adjacent residential developments along the sides of the project. The structure will be of a concrete construc- tion with the first level depressed approximately 4 feet and the second level approximately 4 feet above grade. The protective railings and barriers will be approximately 7' above grade. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed parking structure should have minimal impact on adjacent properties, if proper landscaping buffers are pro- vided and specific attention is provided regarding parking area lighting and screening. 'these concerns are addressed in the conditions of approval. J a n The proposed office building is a four story structure with a contemporary design. Building materials are shown as an off white concrete wall with a sand blasted finish and a blue/green reflective glass for glazing treat - writ. Windows are accented with dark green aluminun mullions and an accent strip of dard red. The Bascom Ave. and parking structure elevations have proposed balconies which provide relief to the building facade. The entrance to the office building is at the northwest corner of the structure near the parking faci- lities. Access to the projec' has been proposed solely from the Bascom Ave. frontage. Two driveways to the north and south of the office building provide accessi- bility to the rear parking area. Staff is of the opinion that restrictive access to the Bascom Ave. frontage is necessary to preserve the residential character of Michael Drive frontage. Staff does express a concern that the pedestrian circulation on site be studied further, in that vehicle and pedes- trian circulation are not well separated at this time. The applicant has provided 560 parking spaces (330 standard, 222 compact, 8 handicapped) for this project which results in a parking ratio of 1:250. Chapter 21.50 of the Zoning Ordinance indicates that parking should be provided at a ratio of 1:225 for office uses. The Planning Commission, how- ever, may approve lesser parking when the applicant has demonstrated that less parking is warranted. Staff is of the opinion that due to the scale of the proposed project the requested parking ratio is acceptable. Approval of a parking ratio of 1:250 would be consistent with previous Planning Com- mission appr,)vals of larger projects. The Architectural Advisor is of the opinion that the building design is well done. He does suggest t1.gt �r ther study be done of the accent treat- ment and the way such bands meet the glass. Staff is of the opinion that the project is conceptually acceptable and is recommending its approval subject to the submittal of revised plans for the approval of the Planning Commission. Revised plans should address the following concerns: 1) Details of parking structure, loading and trash enclosure area, and plaza area. 2) Further study of the proposed accent bands on the building. 3) Better separation and clarification of pedestrian circulation on site. 4) Provision of more landscaping along the southern portion of the parking structure. Since this proposal is for a significant development on Bascom Avenue, Staff is also recommending that the application be referred to the City Council. The Commission may recal that the Council has expressed a desire in the past to review applications for large projects that may have an impact on an area. a**�•�ex a OON CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Up 84-08 & S 84-11 APPLICATION OF: Lincoln property Co. SITE ADDRESS: 2105 S. Bascom Ave. P C NTG: 7-10-84 N/A Revised elevations and/or site plan to be approved by the Plannin Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor, wit rn 30 days of the Planning Commission approval. 1 _ Revised elevations and/or site plan to be approved by the Sjte­ fr Architectural-ReYaev�Lomnittee and/or the Planning Comnissionwith- in 30 days of Planning Commission approval. 2 Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 3 Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted for approval of the Site & Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to app icaV on for a building permit. (Additionally, lighting plan.) S/A Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted for approval of the Planning Director prior to application for a building permit. 4 Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be submitted for approval of the Site and Architectural Review Committee prior to application for building permit. S Applicant to26i� 6r (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $ to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas witM-n 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing and strip- ing of parking areas prior to application for a building permit. 6 Applicant to submit a plan, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening(if bo)(^s are aboveground) for approval of the Planninq Director. 7 Applicant to submit a letter, satisfactory to the City Attorney, limiting the use of the property to: 140 OOn square feet of office use, square feet of speculative industrial use, and square feet of warehouse use, prior to issuance ooTa�iTding permit. 8 All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. D Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are installed. •n/a: not applicable to this application. PAGE 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: UP 84-08 $ S 84-11 APPLICATION OF: Lincoln Property Co. SITE ADDRESS: 210S S. Bascom Ave. The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with Ordinance of the City of Campbell and Laws of the State of California. A All parking and driveway areas to be developed in comnliance with Section 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper auards. _B Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. _ Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and tele- vision cables, etc. _ D Sign application to be submitted in accordance with nrovisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by the Building Depart- ment (Section 21.68.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code). E Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, oarbaae, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apart- ment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. I' Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) apnroved by the Fire De- partment. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self -closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level, and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. G Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City re- quirements for the handicapped. �A Noise levels for the interior of residential units shall comply with minimum State (Title 25) and local standards as indicated in the Noise Element of the Campbell General Plan. \/ 1 Applicant is hereby notified that he will be required to pay Park Dedication In -Lieu Fee which will be assessed at the time the subdivision map is submitted. STANDARD FIRE HAZARD ABATEMENT COMMENT: The applicant is hereby notified that the property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that actual construction commences. A71 existing structures shall be kept secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolish- ed or removed from the property. Sect. 11.201 6 11.414, 1979 Ed. Uniform Fire Code. PAGE 3 CONDITIONS OF APPPOVAL: UP 84-08 G S 84-11 APPLICATION OF: Lincoln Property Co. SITE ADDRESS: 2105 S. Bascom Ave. PUBLIC WORKS DEFT. H. Construct an additional S/B lane on the Highway 17 off ramp at Hamilton Ave. I. Construct a free right turn lane at Hamilton & Bascom for the N/B to E/R movement. This will require right-of-way access, street improvements, and signal revisions. J. Construct an additional left turn lane at Bascom F, Campbell for the N/B to W/B movement. This will require street improvements, island removal and reconstruction on all approaches and new signalizati�n. K. Bond for future median islands from Campbell Ave. to Shady Dale on Bascom Ave. Should the city deem that traffic conditions required positive chan- nelization within five years of occupancy, the developer will install said islands. L. Provide a storm drainage plan that is satisfactory to the City Engineer. M. File a parcel map to combine the three lots. N. Obtain an excavation permit and post surety and pay fee for all work in the public right-of-way. FIRE DE-PARTW24T 0. Provide sprinkler system in office building and lower level of parking structure. P. Provide on -site fire hydrants for parking structures. Q. Designation of fire lane around building. R. Provide 2A:10BC fire extinguishers. The applicant is notified that he/she shall comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. CITY OF C A M P S E L L APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT 70 North First Street Campbell, CA 95008 PHONE: (408) 866-2130 PROJECT ADDRESS_�i65 ppplcant's Name Date /4%-Z� z Applicant's Address Construction Lender's Name Applicant must contact departments and provide additional information marked "%" below. Approvnla will be granted by each city department through interoffice mail on separate forme. PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO BUILDING DEPARTMENT WHEN PROJECT MEETS YOUR REQUIREMENTS Required Approved SANITATION DISTRICT No. 4 100 E. Sunnyosks Ave., Campbell 370-2407 ��— Supply one set of plans for industrial and commercial developments. Retu-n yellow copy of sewer permit to Building Department. 'PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 70 N. First St., Campbell 866-2100 Supply plot plan, elevation, and floor plan. FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE, 123 Union Ave., Caap'.ell 866-2189 Supply one set of complete building plans. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, 70 N. First St., Campbell 866-2150 Supply five sets of off -site improvement plans, and excavation permit application. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES, Steve Brooks, 299-6060 2220 Moorpark Ave., San Jose, CA 9517E Supply two sets of complete building plans. WATER POLLUTION CONTROL, Clifford R. Young, 905-53oo 700 Los Esteros Rd., San Jose, CA 95134 Required Received ENERGY FORMS HANDICAPPED FORMS SOILS REPORT ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS PLAN CHECK FEE SOUND TRANSMISSION CONTROL DRAINAGE PLAN OTHER 3 CITY OF CAMPBELL BUILDING PERMIT INFORMATION TO BE COMPLETED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT Building Address -Owner Telephone P 71 -69?!� Contractor's Name l�m�n C-six-d,G_ State Licanac No. Address Architect or Engineer State License No. Address APN_ zd - _Planning Dept. No. Energy CaLcs. /--Xe�5 Group Type /_/14�1 Fire Sprinklered� No. of Bldgs. Residential Units Commercial Units / Description of Work Square Feet (a) 7 Valuation �a) ' Square Feet (b) Valuation (b) $ Other To -al Valuation Advance Fee Paid $ %s Date __Receipt No. G! Building Permit Fee $ /.Se . /Z _ Total Building Permit Fee $�i6�.•� Construction Tax $ _ Balance Due $ �2,�?6 •,3� Ro. Sets of Signed Plana Rng. Calce._ Logged / r,ondltions or Rmar1rs_1��¢�'L��1,.� •G7 i ?Y. 1 f 2 STAFF PROCESS LIST FILE NO. S 84-11 <6p- S i3 D CASE SHEET AGENDA DATE: DATE FILED: 4-9-84 FEE: ?1000 PAID: 4-9-84 SITE ADDRESS: 2105 S. Bascom Ave. APN NO: 413-44-72,73,83 PROPOSED USE: Your story office building ZONING: C-2-S, R-3-S (140,900 sq. ft.) GENERAL PLAN: Cormrrcial/High Density Residential APPLICANT: DIr. Burch Boone ADDRESS: 101 Lincoln Centre Drive Poster City, CA 94044 PHONE NO: (415) 571-2200 r • w DATE PUBLISHED IN CAHPBELL PRESS: DATE PROPERTY WAS POSTED (IF APPLICABLE): DATE LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT: DATE OF FIRST (PUBLIC) HEARING: CONTINUED TO: / APPROVED DATE: RESOLUTION NO: DENIED DATE: RESOLUTION NO: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY CITY COUNCIL: FINAL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED Copies to: CITY OF C A M P B E l C APPLICAT?ON FOR BUILDING PERMIT 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAMPBELL, CA 95008 PHONE: (408) 866-2'30 PROJECT ADDRESS Applicant's Name ^/� 4� /J �'`/ Date Applicant's Address /D 4 Phone Construction Lender's Name Applicant must contact departments and provide additional information marked "K" below. Approvals will be granted by each city department through interoffice mail on separate forms. PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO BUILDING DEPARTMENT WHEN PROJECT MEETS YOUR REQUIREMENTS Required Approved S ANITAYIO`1 DISTRICT No. 4 100 E. Suniyoaks Ave., Campbell 378-2407 Supply one set of plans for industrial and commercial developments. Return yellow copy of sewer permit to rrV Building C�partmert. PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 70 N. First St., Campbell 866-2140 FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE, 123 Union Ave., Campbell 866-2189 Supply one set of complete building plans. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, 70 N. First St., Campbell 866-2150 Supply two sets of on -site drainage plans. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES, Chris Rummel, 299-6060 2220 Moorpark Ave., San Jose, CA 95128 Supply two sets of complete building plans. Required Received ENERGY FORMS HANDICAPPED FORMS SOILS REPORT ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS PLAN CHECK FEE SOUND TRANSMISSION CONTROL OTHER '" � E P 18 1986 CITY OF CAMPEi@L``: ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT k CITY OF CAMPBELL BUILDING PERMIT INFORMAT13N TO BE COMPLETED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT Building Address/QS Owner ..� -�i > Telephone <Z Contractor's Name (e3� d/i State License No. Address XoP Architect or Engineer State License No. AdOceas APN Planning Dept. No. Energy Calcs.� Group - L Type — Fire Sprinklered— No. of Bldgs. / Rrsidential Units —C: Commercial Units / Description of Work / Square Feet (a) 9S0 97 Valuation (a) Square Feet (b) Valuation (b) $ Other Total Valuation $ Advance Fee Paid $ % 41, Od Date Receipt No. _ Building Permit Fee $ ram, Total Building Permit Fee Construction Tax $ Balance Due no. gets of Signed Plans �Lng. talcs. Logged Conditions or Remarks MUM a i CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAmPBELL. CALIFORNIA 95008 (408)866-2100 Department: Planning May 20, 1986 Daniel R. Ortiz Burch Boone Jorge de Quesada, Inc. Lincoln Property Co. 1700 Montgomery St. 101 Lincoln Centre Dr. San Francisco, CA 94111 Foster City, CA 94044 FILE NO: S 84-11 ADDRESS: 2105 S. Bascom Ave. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Lighting Plan SITE 6 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW APPOINTMENT: Date: Tuesday, May 27, 1986 Time: 11:00 a Please be advised that the Site and Architectural 1. iew Committee of the Campbell Planning Commission will review your plans for approval of the above -referenced project at the appointment time noted above, in the Planning Conference Room, North Wing, City Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. A copy of the Staff Report and recommendation will be mailed to you on Friday May 27 1986. If you are in agreement with the Staff recommendation it is not necessary that you attend the meeting. If you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact the Planning Office at 866-2140. -s Sincerely, ARTHUR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR ld t I. CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 N O R T H F I R S T S T R E E T CAMP BELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 866-2100 Department: Planning May 6, 1986 Roger Oser Lincoln Property Company 101 Lincoln Centre Dr. Foster City, CA 94404 RE: Lighting Plan - 6 month review 2105 S. Bascom Ave. (S 84-11) r Dear Mr. Oser: Please be advised that the Site and Architectural Review Comittee of the Campbell Planning Commission will review the above referenced project on Tuesday, May 13, 1986 at 10:30 a.m. in the North Wing Conference Room, Campbell City Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. A copy of the Staff Comment Sheet and recommendation will be mailed to you on the Friday before the meeting. If you are in agreement with the recommendation on t'ie Staff Report, it is not necessary for you to attend the scheduled appointment with the Site and Architectural Review Committee. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the Planning Departnent. Sincerely, �zz `- ARTHUR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR lj tf 1 CITY OF CAMPIIELL 70 N O R T H F I R S T S T R E E T CAMP BELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408)866-2100 Department: Planning April 28, 1986 Mr. Roger Oser Lincoln Property Co, 101 Lincoln Centre Dr, Foster City, CA 94404 RF,: Six-month review of parking lot lighting - 2105 S. Bascom Ave, Dear Mr, Oser: At its meeting of February 19, 1985, the Site and Architectural Review Committee conditionally approved the parking lot lighting plan for the above -referenced office project, This approval required a six-month review of the lighting for the parking structure. A review of this matter has been scheduled for the Plan meeting of Flay 27, 1986, At this time, the Planning Department is not aware of a1 regarding the lighting in the parking area of this proji An agenda and Staff Report will be sent to you prior to Sincerely, ARTHUR A. KEE PLANNINC DIRECTOR TIM J. HALEy C MANNER II id VITV (OF CAMPBELL 70 NORTH FIRS 1 STREET CAM PBEL L, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408)866-2100 Dep�noren:_ Planning April 9, 1986 Mr. Rogt- Oser Lincoln Property Co. 101 Lincoln Centre Dr. Foster City, CA 94404 RE: Modification to approved elevations S 84-11 and UP 84-08 2105 S. Bascom Ave. Dear Mr. Oser: Please be advised that the Planning Commission, at its meeting of April 8, 1986, approved your proposal to change from a red granite veneer treatment to a blue/green painted treatment for the accent bands shown on the approved building elevations. This treatment should be completed on or before May 9, 1986. If you have questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact the Planning Departmen- Sincerely, ARTHUR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR TIM J. HALEY PLANNER 21 ld ice•'. 1 CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAM PBEL L, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408)866-2100 I Department: Planning April 4, 1986 TO: M-. Roger Oser Lincoln Property Co. 101 Lincoln Centre Dr. Foster City, CA 94404 FILE NO: S 84-11/UP 84-08 ADDRESS: 2105 S. Bascom Ave. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Modification to elevations SITE 6 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW APPOINTMENT: Date: Tuesday, April 8, 1986 Time: 3:45 a.m. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: 7:30 p.m., Tuesday, April 8, 1986 Please be advised that the Site and Architectural Review Committee of the Campbell Planning Commission will review your plans for approval of the above -referenced project at the apointment time noted above, in the Planning Conference Room, North Wing, City Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. The Committee Chairman will then make a recommendation at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission which is held at 7:30 p.m, on the above -referenced date, In th•e City Hall Council Chambers, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. A copy of the Staff Report and recommendation, as well as the agenda for the Planning Commission meeting, is enclosed for your information. It is necessary that you, or an authorized representative, be present at the Architectural Review Committee meeting and the Planning Commission meeting. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact the Planning Department at 866-2140. Sincerely. ARTHUR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR ld/1j i 'g — J CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 N O R T H F I R S T STREET CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 866-2100 Planning February 21, 1986 Department: Daniel R. Ortiz Burch Boone Jorge de Quesada, Inc. Lincoln Property Co. 1700 Montgomery St. 101 Lincoln Centre Dr. San Francisco, CA 94111 Foster City, CA 94044 RE: S 84-11/UP 84-08 2105 S. Bascom Ave. Please be advised that the Planning Commission of the City of Campbell has set the time of 7:30 p.m., or shortly thereafter, on Tuesday, February 25, 1986 for consideration of the above -referenced applicaticn. A copy of the agenda and the Staff Comment Sheet for this item is enclosed for your information. It is advisable that you, or an authorized representative, be present for said hearing. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the Planning Department at 866-2140. ! Sincerely, ARTHUR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR ld/lj Enclosures f _J CITY OF CAMPIIELL 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAM PBEL L, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408)866-2100 Department: Planning January 24, 1986 TO: Daniel R. Ortiz Burch Boone Jorge de Quesada, Inc. Lincoln Property Co. 1700 Montgomery St. 101 Lincoln Centre Dr. San Francisco, CA 94111 Foster City, CA 94044 FILE NO: S 84-11/UP 84-08 ADDRESS: 2105 S. Bascom PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Appeal of Planning Director decision SITE 6 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEI9 APPOINTMENT: Date: Tuesday, January 28, 19:36 Time: 10:30 a.m. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: 7:30 pm, Tuesday, Januar, 28, 1986 Please be advised that the Architectural Review Committee of the Campbell Planning Commission will review your plans for approval of the above -referenced project at the appointment time noted above, in the North Winn Conference Room, City Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. The Committee Chairman will then make a recommendation at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission which is held at 7:30 p.m. on the above -referenced date, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. A copy of the Staff Comment Sheet and recommendation, as well as the agenda for the Planninq Cormnission meeting, is enclosed for your information. It is necessary that you, or an authorized representative, be present at said Architectural Review Committee meetinq and the Planning Commission meeting. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact the Planning Department at 866-2140. Sincerely, ARTHUR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR ld/lj Enclosures 1 FROM: . (� FROM: Building Department Department DATE: SUBJECT: Final Inspection at_ c-2 / 0 —I— The Building Department has received a request for a final inspection at the above address. Please inspect this project for compliance with your final inspection requirements. PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO BUILDING DEPARTMENT r- n r;4M 90JECT MEETS YOUR REQUIREMENTS. Approved Date IZ Iy�71t CITY C = GAv t3EicLL p LANNIN D=PWRTMENT LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY i 10 December 1985 Mr. Arthur A. Kee, Planning Director CITY OF CAMPBEI.L 70 North First Street Campbell, CA 95008 Dear Mr. Kee: As per our agreement at the Architectural Review Committee meeting today regarding our modification of 2105 South Bascom Avenue building elevations, we agree to the following: 1) We will place a sample stripe on the building in the existing reveal to illustrate how the actual stripe will look. 2) After members of the Architectural Review Committee have a chance to view the stripe, we would expect to be heard at the January 14th or Janut-y 28th Architectural Review Committee meeting. 3) We will adhere to the final City Council deci„ion regarding the treatment of the reveal. The above is agreed to under the condition that we shall be granted a permit for the hook-up of our gas meter upon acceptance by you of this letter and final occupancy of the building will not be delayed. Sincerely, aL OI�N PROPERTY COMPANY ager "Oser Project Manager The above is hereoy agreed to: Date: Arthur A. Kee, Planning Director 101 Lincoln Centre Drive Foster City, CA 94404 DEC l 011,05 CITY Or CAMPBELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT (415) 571-2200 Ssi- 920` to A LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY C, 10 December 1985 Mr. Arthur A. Kee, Planning Di —tot CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 North First Street Campbell, CA 95008 Dear Mr. Kee: As per our agreement at the Architectural Review Committee meeting today regarding our modification of 2105 South Bascom Avenue building elevations, we agree to the following: 1) We will place a sample stripe on the building in the existing reveal to illustrate how the actual stripe will look. 2) after members of the Architectural Review Committee have a chance to view the stripe, we would expect to be heard at the January 14th or January 28th Architectural Review Committee meeting. 3) We will adhere to the final City Council decision regarding the treatment of the reveal. The above is agreed to under the condition that we shall be granted a permit for the hook-up of our gas meter upon acceptance by you of this letter and final occupancy of the building will not be delayed. Si: cerely, LIN 01�N PROPERTY COMPANY Roger Oser Project Manager The above is hereby agreed to: I Date: _ Arthur A. Kee, Planning Director 161 Lincoln Centre Drive Foster City. CA 94404 (415) 571-2200 CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAMP BELL. CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 866-2100 Depa,tn t. Planning December 6, 1985 TO: Daniel R. Ortiz Burch Boone Jorge de Quesaaa, Inc. Lincoln Property Co. 1700 Montgomery St. 101 Lincoln Centre Dr. San Francisco, CA 9411i Foster City, CA 94044 FILE NO: S 84-11/UP 84-08 ADDRESS: 2105 S. Bascom PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Appeal of Planning Director decision SITE d ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW APPOINIMENT: Date: Tuesday, December 10, 1985 Time: 10:45 a.m. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: 7:30 pm, Tuesday, December 10, 1985 Please be advised that the Architectural Review Committee of the Campbell Planning Commission will review your plans for approval of the above -referenced project at the appointment time noted above, in the North Wing Conference Room, City Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. The Committee Chairman will then make a recommendation at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission which is held at 7:30 p.m. on the abovc-referenced date, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. A copy of the Staff Comment Sheet and recommendation, as well as the agenda for the Planning Commission meeting, is enclosed for your information. It is necessary that you, or an authorized representative, be present at said Architectural Review Committee meeting and the Planning Commission meeting. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact the Planning Department at 866-2140. Sincerely, aa4ee.- ARTHUF A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR ld/lj Enclosures --- 1 .J JORGE DE QUESADA. INC. ARCHITECTS April 19, 1985. Campbell Planning Department City of Campbell 75 North Central Avenue Campbell California 95008 Attn: Arthur A. Kee Re: Campbell Office Building/Lincoln Court 0 Job #84-04 2105 South Bascom Avenue Campbell, California 95008 Dear Mr. Kee: This letter is in reference to the color of the trash enclosure and masonry wall on the south side of the building at the loading dock. We have decided that both these items will be painted to match the G.F.R.C. panels on the building, which are white as approved, thus creating uniform appearance. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions on this matter. Sincerely, may, Tom TC:cw CC: John :aleigh - Webcor Builders Roger Oser - Lincoln Property Co. Dan Ortiz - Jorge de Quesada APR 18 1985 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANWNG DEPARTMENT. 1700 MONTGOMERY STREET SAN FRANCISCO. CALIFORNIA 9411 1 (41 S) 434 3690 X l`IYY (IF CAMNIIELL 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAM PBEL L. CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 866-2100 Department: Planning April 8, 1985 Scott Kunutani Carroll Resources Engineering 6 Management 6375 Clark Ave., Suite 102 Dublin, CA 94568 RE: 2105 S. Bascom Ave. Derr Mr. Kunitani This letter is in response to your letter dated April 1, 1985. The C-2-S (General Commercial) zoning district extends 240 feet west of the westerly line of South Bascom Avenue on the above referenced property. If you have further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact CLe Planning Office. Sincerely, ARMOR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR MARTr WOODWORTH 1 PLANNER II AM: 1j CARROLL RESOURCES ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT 6375 Clark Avenue, Suite 102 Dublin, California 94568 (415) 829-7553 April 1, 1985 Mr. Art Kee Planning Director Department of Planning City of Campbell 123 South Union Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 Subject: 2105 South Bascom Avenue Campbell, California Our Job Number: 657-0400 Dear Mr. Kee: The owner of the above mentioned property, Lincoln Property Company, has requested that we confirm that the office building presently under construction to lie within the C2S zoning district. To do so we request written confirmation of the location of the C2S/R3S boundary which divides the property. We have been told previously, by your department, that the zoning line lies 240 feet west of the South Bascom Avenue property line. If you have any question, please feel free to call. Very Lr.Iy yours, 17 Scott Kunitani Project Engineer SK:dle d2165704001t329 MCM9 APR 0 41,985 CITY OF CAMPSELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT C1Mt CFit FIRE DEPARTMENT 7 pia S J. you LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY January 17, 1925 Mr. Bob Dempster City Attorney City of Campbell 70 North First Street Campbell, California 95008 RE: 2105 Bascom Avenue Lincoln -Court Campbell Dear M,. Dempster: R This letter is to confirm Lincoln Property Company's understanding that the abov,� property is limited to 122,383 square feet of office use. Sincerely, ass> - Burch Boone Partner BB:dm CC: 20325 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, California 91_14 STATE OFCALIFORNIA On this 17th dayof Januaryin the year one COUNTY OF thousand nine hundred and eighty-f ive , before me, .4-/N0,4 M FEi.tCP- rgrd , a Notary Public, State of California. duly commissioned and sw, m, personally appeared Burch Boone L nown to me to be the person _ whose name subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me N OTAW nieuc - -wait nvcwHry that _ he _ _ executed the same. e'r �. L� �° "' 11p IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand andaffixed my oJ1 seal in the County of n '11 I G o the day and year in this certificate first above written. nmry.pww.i Tarn wcn rMre.waon �ar�u n.n,a.nanuciwna ��`—'111�C< (iZl 1 �+�."�X/l A C� r a,r.,esom.craawaewr. ror�M.ac.dan.rio,,,.r Notary blic. State of California Tewd MYEo.a nd rMa..r,r.nrr.m. w,Mr.,da.a a +rpyp at io rM spa� .aqir o'anv dwnaanalM wxrWrrrydiMwrd,m naT fpcnK ir.nucim pp/ My commtrNan expires Cuwdery's Form No. 32 — Acknowledgement — General (C. C. Sec'. I190a) CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAM PBE1.L. CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 866.2100 Department: Planning February 19, 1985 Mr. Roger Oser Lincoln Property Company 101 Lincoln Centre Dr. Foster City, CA 94404 RE: Landscape, Fencing and Lighting Plan (S 84-11) 2105 S. Bascom Ave. Dear Mr. Oser: Please be advised that the Site and Architectural Review Committee reviewed the referenced plans for your office project and took the following action: 1. Approved the revised landscaping and irrigation plans as submitted. 2. Approved the proposed 7 foot pre -cast concrete wall (grape stake pattern) as indicated on plans. Color sample to be submitted to the Planning Department for the review of the Architectural Advisor. 3. Approved the sectional details of the parking area and the screening of the trash enclosure. 4. Conditionally approved the lighting proposal, subject to a six month review by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. If you have any questions regarding this approval, please do not hesitate to contact the Planning Office. Sincerely, ARTHUR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR 4 TIM J. EY U PLANNER II a TJH:lj LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY 1N3V41"Yd3o nNiN A11� January 29, 1985 1"13GdWd� �� Mr. Phillip Stafford Assistant Planning Director City of Campbell Planning Department 70 North First Street Campbell, California 95008 Dear Mr. Stafford: As requested, please find enclosed three (3) sets of plans showing the trash enclosure area and landscaping plan for 2105 South Bascom, Campbell. If thure should be any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you very much. S�erel,,, Roger Oser Project Manager RO:dm Enclosures 3 101 Lincoln Centre Drive Foster Clty. CA 94404 (415( 571.2200 .. ....,,,,- ..,...w�..ey� CITY OF CAMPBELL 75 NORTH CENTRA I_ AVENUE CAMPBELL, CA LIF08NIA 95006 (408) 378 8 14 1 Department: Planning Date: February 8, 1985 TO: Burch Boone Lincoln Property Li. 101 Lincoln Centre Dr. Foster City, CA 94041 S84-11 FILE NO: UP84-08 ADDRESS: 2105 S. Bascom Ave. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Landscape Plan SITE 8 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT: Date: Tuesday, February 12, 1985 Time: 10:45 a.m. Please be advised that the Site anG Architectural Review Committee of the Campbell Planning Commission will review your landscape plans for the above -referenced project at the appointment time noted above, in the North Wing Conference Room, Campbell City Hall, 75 N. Central Avenue, Campbell, California. A copy of the Staff Comment Sheet and recommendation is enclosed for your review. It is requested that you or an authorized representative be present at said meeting. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Department. Sincerely, C� a E; c -F ARTHUR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR ld Enclosure "PLEASE NOTE: If you are in agreement w-th the recommendation on the attached Staff Report, it is not necessary for you to attend the scheduled appointment with th-e-Tite and Architectural Review Cortaittee LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY January 31, 1985 Mr. Phillip Stafford Principal Planner City of Campbell 70 North First Street Campbell, California 95008 RE: 2105 South Bascom Avenue, Campbell, California Landscaping, Irrigation, Fencing and Lighting Plans (UP84-o8/S84-11) Dear Phil: This letter is to confirm Lincoln's understanding that at the meeting of January 8, 1985, the site and architectural review committee continued consideration of the referenced plans so that further information could be provided. In order to maintain the project construction schedule, it is necessary for Lincoln to now obtain the building permit and as a condition of the issuance of that permit, it is Lincoln's understanding that the permit is being issued conditioned on final review of the above items by the site and architectural review committee on February 12, 1985. Sincerely, Burch Boone Partner BB:dm LITY r-7 CAMPOE:LL PLANNIN^ n�:PARTN,[NT 101 Lincoln Centre Drive Foster City, CA 94404 (415) 571-2200 .— N CITY OF E,MP3ELL, CALIFORN NOTICE OF DETERMINATION_ TO: Secretary for Resources 3s 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1311 FROM:I� 3ePartment Sacramento, CA 95614 of.Ja k7d 5 rtk,Ce r Avenue XX ampbejlg4C 5008 u County Clerk's Office SEP 5 yy Santa Clara County C 191 North First Street i��M OYB�Osunty San Jose, CA 95713 t SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in Compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. PROJECT TITLE: _B h4-11) STAT[- -WUMBE R rrf"�y7" - CONTACT PERSON Tim J. Haley Tel. No. (408) 378-8141, Ext. 236 PROJECT LOCATION 2105 S. Bascom Ave. PROJECT DESCRIPTION site and architectural application to allow the construction of a four sty-off`ce heildin of annrn im r 11 1an nnn yr This is to advise that the CITY OF CAMPBELL has made the followinq determinations regarding the above described project. 1. The project has been 7f approved by the City of Campbell. disapproved 2 The project will have a significant effect on the environment. t will not 3. __A- An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant 1 to the provisions of CEQA. The EIR or Negative Declaration and record of project approval may ba examined at: The Planning Department, City of Campbell, 75 North Central Avenue, Campbell, CA 95008. 4. Mitigation measures- were made a condition of the approval were not of this project. 5. A statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project. was not !� DATE RECEIVED FOR FILING: SIGNATURE i TITLE e LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY January 17, 1985 Mr. Bob Dempster City Attorney City of Campbell 70 North First Street Campbell, California 95008 RE: 2105 Bascom Avenue Lincoln -Court Campbell. Dear Mr. Dempster: This letter is to confirm Lincoln Property Company's understanding t.liat the above property is limited to 122,383 square feet of office use. Sincerely, BurchBoone Partner BB:Am cc: 20325 Stevens Creek BJUlevard, Cu,pe California 95014 STA9:.OFCALIFORNIA C., this 17th dayvf January in the year one COUNTY OF thousand nine hundred and eighty-five , before me, /f&)04 M. VELLER�_, a Notary Public, State of California, duly commissioned rad sworn, personally appeared Burch Boone _ �_ • ,„� known to me to be the person _ whose name (tP1GIl.I.!=AL 1 i L'NUA M. FEUkRMAN __ > subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me 1 uiury w +.uM cwrr w su+tEo caxnr ,hat __ he _executed the same. 22.11q, IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand andaffixed my a°1 seal In the County of � 1 1 GcC" .— the day and year In this certificate flrH above+critten. nro 0cc�mml roaaY.p.rrv.l form Nxcn nMYbgoMrld uq mmmpMlrnngcl•nz t/�"S. ✓�� ��`�/`�'��� erq in ro w.r.cb. p s mbrpgb.tl, q.,uE.lrlaa la IM W.. d.n.11orM. 1, .r:.. d,droMr son na mwe.rrr...rr.mr,.mr.r gar«. a.mra.e to lM ns.Notary 'Ik ^State �of- California / .,.ara..rao.»nor++wlwnam...wm.m.r..,IkI,.M..lorr My commission expiresb Cuwdery's Form No. 32 — Acknowledgement -- General (C. C. Sec. 1190s) Q . �.,.w�-r•---++� .•.tsxssattnare.aaa..r►,-+rrs"-••""".,.ar••••+au4wu. 00% ^ LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY January 17, 1905 �-4 Mr. Bob Dempster City Attorney City of Campbell 70 North First Street Campbell, California 95008 RE: 2105 Bascom Avenue 1 Lincoln -Court Campbell. Dear Mr. Dempster: This letter is to confirm Lincoln Property Company's understanding that the above property is limited to 122,383 square feet of office use. Sincerely, Burch Boone Partner BB:dm cc: 20325 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Cupertino, California 95014 STATLOFCALIFORNI�A On this 17th day of January in the year one COUNTY OF _�.�� thousand nine hu,dred and eighty-five , before me, j "j0,4 M. FEGCCkmrg1J , a Notary Public, State of California, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared .urch Boone _ �i. =r.,u, known to me to be the person _ whose name F LINDA M. FEUERMAN 5 subscribed to the within InstnFmtnt and acknowledged tome rar —C - CsuFoar.0 sun sureo caunry that _ he— executed the same. `�""'"° 't' 10s0 IN WI TNESS WHEREOF I hoot hereunto set my hand and affixed my offikial seal In the County of n-n I� the day and year In this certificate first above written. / .ow.n.�meem',....m..,,..n.�M..a.,•>,.w.a.eom�a,Notary lic, State of California0� My commission expires Cuwdery's Form No. 32 — Acknowledgement — General (C. C. Sec. 1 `90a) J STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ,)t 11�n GFFICfAL SEAL G ARIFNE CONSTANTINE _\ NOTARY GUBLIC • CALIFORNIA r•y nmm. eaolics On this 17th day of January in the year one nlrtt lei. ht •-five , before me, a Notary Public, State of California, dtdy comma tioned and sworn, personally appeared _ Burch eoone known to me to be the person _ whose name subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that _ he _ executed the some. IN WITNESS N'HQR OF I haoe ereun o set my hand andafJlsed my o idol seal In the _ County of r t' r, the ay andJost, in t" cawficate first rnn eo.•,mmiao-.r.r«+.r iom,.«e. m.r e.n�w�awMwro.�,. � . LA(-V J'"VI :I1, l hlC Notary Public, State of California �.o�an�.��oe.. ropm.n•.rn w,,.,rr wiw..a...w�mare.n loin rc« ..�ai.o,.00.,.o�wn. wuewna�n.. �wo-.�....w«�nc i,«•r.o�w� IC-,_<b .55 My comm4Nun expires Co•idery's Form No. 32 — Acknowledgement — Generd (C. C. Sec. 1190a) I CITY OF CAMPBELL LANDSCAPE AGREEMENT n :a CITY OF CANIPEELL PLANNING [ r.-TI.;ENT FILE N S-TY-IJ E. UP8y,_68 APPLICANT/ 0It2JER: L`PG-$a6¢om SITE ADDRESS: a los sa 64--dcn A✓a DATE APPROVED BY PLANNING OCtWSSION: 1 S g5 The applicant/owner of above -referenced property does hereby agree to the following condition, which was approved as a part of this applica- tion: In lieu of the landscape bond r:gtested as a condition of the above -referenced approval, I do hereby agree to the alternate condition that the proposed development as described above shall not receive final Building Department clearance until the landscaping which was required, and accepted, as a part o; such approval has been completely installed and accepted by the Plan- ning DIrector of the City of Campbell. Signed: . * Authority: Rate: January 17, 1185 *Note: This agreement shall be signed before a Notary by the owner, developer or his agent, or auiy person having an equitable in- terest in the development. SUBSCRIBED AND SA7PN TO BEFORE ME (� ''"^�/./( THIS PAY OF . 0 V l9 Notary Public in and for the County of Santa Clara, State of California. I CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 N O R T H F I R S T S T R E E T CAM PBEL L, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408)866-2100 !�2 Ae'da'1�Jaj� 'i j ! 1985 U" IVW4 x�ALU, JW. Department: Planning January 11, 1985 Ri Mr. Burch Boone Jmi lu 1985 10 Lincoln Property Co. CITY OF CAMPBELL 101 Li.nculn Centre Dr. PLANNING DEPARTMENT Foster City, CA 94044 RE: Revised Plans as Required by Condition N1 UP 84-08/S 84-11 2105 S. Bascom Ave. Dear Mr. Boone: Please be advised that the Planning Commission, at its meeting of January 8, 1985 approved the revised site plan and elevations for your project. This approval satisfies Condition N1 of the above -referenced application, and is subject to the condition that cross sections of the parking structure be provided to demonstrate the height of the structure in relation to neighboring residential uses and the Michael Drive frontage. These sections should be sub- mitted to the Planning Department for the approval of the Site and Architectural Review Committee. An additional concern was expressed regarding the screening of the trash compactor area. A proposed screening of this area should b,: provided for the approval of the Site and Architectural Review Committee. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please t.o not hesitate to contact the Planning Department. Sincerely, ARTHUR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR TIM J. HALEY PLANNER II TJH:ld cc: Daniel Ortiz, Jorge Pe Quesada m CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAMP BELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408)866-2100 0epartment: Planning January 11, 1985 Mr. Burch Boone Lincoln Property Co. 101 Lincoln Centre Dr. Foster City, CA 94044 RE: Landscaping, Irrigation, Fencing and Lighting Plans (UP 84-08/S 84-11) - 2105 S. Bascom Ave. Dear Mr. Boone: Please be advised that at its meeting of January 8, 198! the Site and Architectural Review Committee continued t] consideration of the referenced plans so that further it formation could be provided. The revised plans should address the following concerns: Landscape Plans: 1. Increase the amount of lawn areas along the Michael Drive frontage. 2. Provide additional bollards at easterly end of emergent}- access road. 3. Provide a variety of shrub heights adjacent to Landicapped parking spaces to provide a bet buffer from the parking area. 4. Consider alternative design f r Jalkway indica along Bascom Ave. frontage between the public sidewalk and the tire exit. Fencing Plans: S. The proposed block wall on the northerly and southerly property lines should be sterped dow 15' from the street property line to a maximum height of 316". 5 a Mr. Burch Boone Lincoln Property Co. January 11, 1985 Page Two. Lighting Plan:; 6. Lighting distribution diagrams should be provided for parking area lighting. Both plan and elevation F: views should be provided. If you have any questions regarding these matters, please contact the Planning Department at 866-2140. Sincerely, ARTHUR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR TIM J. HALEY � PLANNER II TJH:ld cc: Daniel Orti-, Jorge de Quesada, Architects Anthony M, Guzzardo $ Assoc., Landscape Architect ,�1,.,_- - co -....ems-..►...... �^-- 4° N CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAMPBEL L, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 888.2100 Department: Planning January 11, 1985 Mr. Burch Boone Lincoln Property Co. 101 Lincoln Centre Dr. Foster City, CA 94044 RE: Revised Plans as Required by Condition M1 UP 84-08/S 84-11 2105 S. Bascom Ave. Dear Mr. Boone: Please be advised that the Planning Commiss-'on, at its meeting of January 8, 1985 approved the r-vised site plan and elevations for your project. This approval satisfies Condition X1 of the above -referenced application, and is subject to the condition that cross sections of the parking structure be provided to demonstrate the height of the structure in relation to neighboring residential uses and the Michael Drive frontage. These sections should be sub- mitted to the Planning Department for the approval of the Site and Architectural Review Committee. An additional concern was expressed regarding the screening of the trash compactor area. A proposed screening of this area should be provided for the approval of the Site and Architectural Review Committee. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact the Planning Department. Sincerely, ARTHUR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR TIM J. HALEY PLANNER II TJH:ld cc: Daniel Ortiz, Jorge De Quesada, Architects CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAMP BELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408)866-2100 Department: Planning January 11, 1985 Mr. Burch Boone Lincoln Property Co. 101 Lincoln Centre Dr. Foster City, CA 94044 RE: Landscaping, Irrigation, Fencing and Lighting Plans (UP 54-OS/S 84-11) - 2105 S. Bascom Ave. Dear Mr. Boone: Please be advised that at its meeting of January 8, 1985 the Site and Architectural Review Committee continued the consideration of the referenced plans so that further in- formation could be provided. The revised plans should address the following concerns: Landscape Plans: 1. Increase the amount of lawn areas along the Michael Drive frontage. 2. Provide additional bollards at easterly end of emergency access road. 3. Provide a variety of shrub heights adjacent to handicapped parking spaces to provide a better buffer from the parking area. 4. Consider alternative design for walkway indicated along Bascom Ave. frontage between the public sidewalk and the fire exit. Fencing Plans: S. The proposed block wall on the northerly and southerly property lines should be stepped down 15' from the street property line to a maximum height of 316". Mr. Butch Boone Lincoln Property Co. January 11, 1985 Page Two. R Lighting Plan: 6. Lighting distribution diagrams should be provided for parking area lighting. Both plan and elevation views should be provided. t If you have any questions regarding these matters, please contact the Planning Department at 866-2140. Sincerely, ARTHDR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR TIM J. HALEY PLANNER II TJH:1 d cc: Daniel Ortiz, Jorge de Quesada, Arcnitects Anthony M, Guzzardo $ Assoc., Landscape Architect CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408)866-2100 Department: Planning December 28, 1984 1tr. Burch Boone Lincoln Property Company 101 Lincoln Centre Dr. Foster City, CA 94044 RE: Proposed Parking Structure (S 84-11/UP 84-08) 2105 S. Bascom Ave. Dear Mr. Boone: The Planning Department is in receipt of building and parking structure plans for the proposed office project on the referee--d property. A review of these plans, in particular Sheet A5.3, indicates that the proposed parking garage is to be constructed substantially higher than previously represented to the Planning Commission and the City Council. Specifically, the previous plans presorted to, and approved by, the Planning Commission indicated a parking area depressed 4' with the second level of parking being provided 4' above -grade. The submitted plans now indicate the second level of parking at 715" (Detail 6) and 5'8" (Detail 7) above -grade. The Planning Department does not support this change in parking structure height. Your attention in this matter wnuld be appreciated. Sincerely, ARUM A. KEEE PLANNING DIRECIDR plc J'��lL�i t' TIM J. HALEY l L PLANNER II ld cc: Daniel Ortiz Jorge De Qx sada, Inc. Architects 1700 Montgomery San Francisco, CA 94111 f VITV OF CAMPBEII 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAM PBELL. CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 866-21 00 Departm t Planning DATE: January 4, 1985 TO: Ntr. Burch Boone Mr. Daniel R. Ortiz Lincoln Property Co. Jorge de Quesada Architects 101 Lincoln Centre Dr. 1700 Abntgomery Ave. Foster City, CA 94044 San Francisco, CA 94111 UP 84-08 FILE NO: S 84-11 ADDRESS: 2105 S. Bascom Ave. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Landscaping Plan and Revised Plans SITE b ARCHTTECTURAL REVIEW APPOINTMENT: Date: Tuesday, January 8, 1985 Time: 9:15 a.m. PLANNING COMMISSION MTG: 7:30 p.m., Tuesday, Janua 4 sr1985 Please be advised that the Architectural Review Committee of the Campbell P'ranrling Commission will review your plans for approval of the above - referenced project at the appointment time noted above, in the North Wing Conference Room, City Hall, 75 North Central Avenue, Campbell, California. The Committee Chairman will then make recommendation at the regular meet- ing of the Planning Commission which is held at 7:30 p.m. on the above - referenced sate, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 75 North Central Avenue, Campbell, California. A copy of the Staff Comment Sheet any recommendation, and tF^ agenda for the Planning Commission meeting are enclosed for your information. It is necessary that you, or your authorized representative, oe present at said Architectural Review Committee meeting and the Planning Commission meeting. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact the Planning Department. Sincerely % y�/ _ cc: Anthony M. Guzzardo $ Assoc. �� 836 Tbntgomery St. ARTHUR A. KEE San Francisco, CA 94111 PLANNING DIRECTOR ld Enclosures TO: BUILDING DEPARTMENT FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT:ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT/FINAL CLEARANCE FOR OCCUPANCY DISCUSSION REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF Llf44V +l fkrWUhrl --- FOR PROPERTY OR PROPERTIES KNOWN AS _ ZI-5 -f jjjjL ve.. THE PLANNING COMMISSION HAS APPROVED AN APPLICATION ON THIS PROPERTY ALLOWING THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT: FILE N0._rJ_$4 _I� E 11P d'►^oa TO CONSTRUCT: ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT APPROVED BY DATE: -------- ---- CLEARANCE FOR OCCUPANCY APPROVED BY -------- DATE: LIST OF CONDITIONS :OT SATISFIED: DATE_ !!_tli _ ---�1+1'�lt'-�+lrJsT►�=�_fS►'GNG f+ r _L�bi�I�1 k6ri----------------------- ---11V-------------------------- -------------------- ----- ---- - -------------- --------- -- ITEMS NEEDED FOR OCCUPANCY: DATE: DEVELOPER CONTACTED: YES/NO DATE: CITY OF CAMPBELL 2105 S BASCOM S 84-11 3 of 4 FILE$ CITY OF C.IMPBELL 70 NOPTH FIRST STREET CAMPBELL• CA LIF0RN.A 95008 (408) 866-2130 SUBJECT: Appliptio '�or Building Permit at 7. l oS Scet' (\ FROM: Building Department DATE: k 1 — lq �I(/l L APPLICANT'S NAME PHONE NUMBER LZ APPLICANT'S ADDRESS I L—i+.�C �I O��'z( ""°�• ID:'ee� PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL NO. 4Q I ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER Application for a building permit has been received by the Building Department. Applicant has a copy of this form for his instruction. Building permit shall not be issued until all required agencies have approved application and returned this form to the Building Department. PLEi'..�E RETURN THIS FORM TO BUILDING DEPARTMENT WHEN PROJECT MEETS YOUR REQUIREMENTS. Required Approved Sanitation District ',. 4 100 E. Sunnyoaks t,c., Campbell, 378-2407 Supply one set of plans for industrial and commercial developments. Return yellow copy of sewer permit to Building Department. / Planning Department 70 N. First Street, Campbell, 866-2140 X Fire Marshal's Cffice _— 123 Union Ave., Campbell, 866-2256 Supply one se, of complete building plans. \ / Public Worl partment 70 N. First eet, Campbell, 866-2150 Supply o­ set of on -site drainage plans. Environmental Health Services Chris Rummel 2220 Moorpark Ave., San Jose, 95128 279-6060 Supply two sets of complete building plans. VI II OF CAMNIELL 7 5 N U H T H CENTRAL AVENUE C A M P 8 E L L. CA L I F 0 R N I A 95008 (408) 378-8141 Department: Planning August 31, 1984 Mr. Burch Boone Lincoln Property Co. 101 Lincoln Centre Dr. Foster City, CA 94044 RE: S 84-11 and UP 84-08 2105 S. Bascom Ave. Campbell, CA Dear Mr. Boone: Please be advised that the Planning Commissioa, at its meeting of August 28, 1984, approved your proposal to construct a three- story office building on the referenced property. The Planning Commission action approved your site and architectural application (S 84-11) and adopted Resolution No. 2288 approving the referenced use permit. The effective date of this approval is September 8, 1984. Please find attached the conditions of approval for this project. Section 21.42.090 of the Campbell Municipal Code reads as fellows: Any approves granted under this section shall expire one year afty* the date upon which such approval was granted, unless an extension for such approval is obtained by making written application for same to the Planning Commission at least fif- teen (15) days prior to the expiration date of such approval. No building permit shall be issued after the expiration date of any approval until a new approval has been obtained in the manner provided for in this Chapter. I GRANTED BY 1fE CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING COMMISSION AT A REGULAR MEETING HELn ON TLE 28111 DAY OF AUGUST, 1984. CITY OF CAMPBELL, PLANNING COMMISSION AKHtL1K A. F.TF�St:C�tLfA�2Y -- lj W ^ CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNI-1 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION TO: _ Secretary for Resources FROM: Planning Denartment 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1311 City of Campbell Sacramento, CA 95814 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 XX County Clerk's Office Santa Clara County 191 North First Street San ,Jose, CA 95113 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in Compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. PROJECT TITLE: (5 84-11) STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBE^ (If Any) _ CONTACT PERSON Tim J. r,aley Tel. No. (408) 378-8141, Ext. 236 PROJECT LOCATION 2105 S. Bascom Ave. ' PROJECT DESCRIPTION site and architectural application to allow the construction of a four stor•v Qfficp building of appruimajeiy idn 000 cn ff This is to advise that the CITY OF CAMPBELL has made the following determinations regarding the above described project. I. The project has been approved by the City of Campbell. disapproved 2. The project will have a significant effect on the environment. will rot -- i 3. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A iegative Declaration was Drepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. The EIR or Negative Declaration and rec,.rd of project approval may be examined at: The Planning Department, City of Campbell, 75 North Central Avenue, Campbell, CA 95008. 4. Mitigation measures 4 were made a condition of the approval were not of this project. I 5. A statement of Overriding Considerations _ was adopted for this project. i I was not _ 1 DAFE RECEIVED FOR FILING: L " G _ SIGNATURE _ , 4 I TITLE p�­1 I f it B-96- 4/21/81 NOTICE TO APPLICA14TS REGARDING EFFECT OF WASTEWATER TREATMENT CAPACITY ON LAND DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS PURSUANT TO DEVELOP14ENT OF APN Please take notice that no vested right to a building permit shall accrue as the result of the granting of any land developrent approvals, and applications. Pursuant to the adoption of ordinance 9.045 by County Sanitation District No. 4 of Santa Clara County, the agency providing the above described parcel(s) with sewer service, if the District's Manager and Engineer makes a deter- mination that the issuance'of a sewer connection permit to a building, or proposed building, on the above described property, will, in his opinion, cause the District to exceed its ability to treat adequatel;• the wastewater that would result from the issuance of such connection permit, then said permit may not be issued, and, hence; no building permit may be issued by this agency. If the sewer connection permit is issued, it may contain sub- stantive conditions designed to decrease the wastewater associated with any land use approval. ACKNOWLEDGMENT By signing below, applicant acknowledges, at the time of application, that he/she fully understands the above. APPLICANT y�3-4V-7ZJ 4U3-4+-'73 APN Distribution: Original to County Sanitation District No. 4 Copy to issuing City, Town or County COPY to applicant b CITY OF CAMPBELL 75 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE CAMP 8EL L, CA L I F 0 R N I A 95008 (408) 378-8141 Department: Planning DATE: August 24, 1984 TO: Mr. Burch Boone Bettye C. Baker Lincoln Property Co. c/o Rolland E. Grefe 101 Lincoln Centre Dr. 1980 Financial Center Foster City, CA 94044 Des Nbines, IA W 84-04 FILE NO: S 84-11 ADDRESS: 2105 S. Bascom Ave. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 3-story office building SITE & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW APPOINTMENI: Date: Tuesday, August 28, 1984 Time: 9: 45 a.m. _ PLANNING COMMISSION MTG: 7:30 p.m., Tuesday,Au¢ust 28, 1984 Please be advised that the Architectural Review Committee of the Campbell Planning Commission will review your plans for approval of the above - referenced p,ciect at the appointment time noted above, in the North Wing Conference Room, City Hall, 75 North Central Avenue, Campbell, California. The Committee Chairman will then make recommendation at the regular meet- ing of the Planning Commission which is held at 7:30 p.m. on the above - referenced date, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 75 North Central Avenue, Campbell, California. A copy of the Staff Comment Sheet and recommendation, and the agenda for the Planning Commission meeting are enclosed for your information. It is necessary that you, or your authorized representative, be present at said Architectural Review Committee meeting and the Planning Commission meeting. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact the Planning Department. Sincerely, ARTHUR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR Id Enclosures ?01*1 --' plcv rr�I M TLANN ING COK41SSION AUG 14 SITE i ARCHITECTURAL REVIEvi COMMITTEi'. DEPARTMENT COMMENT SHEET WiM MEDEPAUMFNT ARCHITECT SUILDIN5 DATE: April 26, 1984 FIRE AGENDA: P01SCE PLEASE RETURN DY: May S —1484 . PUBLIC WOU S AppLICANT: Mr. Burch Boone on behalf of Lincoln Property Company No. 1055 Limited ADDRESS: 101 Lincoln Centre Drive Foster City, CA 94044 TELEPHONE: . (415) 571-2200 PROPOSAL: To consider the application of Mr -Burch Boone on behalf of Lincoln S 84-11 Property Co. No. 1055 Limited for approval of plans and elevations Boone, B. to allow the construction of a four story office building(140,000 gross sq. ft.) on property known as 2105 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (Gen eral Commercial) and R-3-S(Multiple Family Residential/High Density Residential) Zoning District. APN 413-44-72,73,83 DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: 1� y� SlSb- ce[��.C� v T CU3L- 3Y'o3 n� '� v` f ectir r- $c-.ck-:wa ..cL-a s L )�_ _o� w M n:•_� Imo. a, _ �oL.a ,_ PLANNING rOK4)SSION SITE I ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE DEPARTMENT COMMENT SHEET ARCHITECT NUILDING DATE: April 26, 1984 FIRE AGENDA: not set PDLfCE PLEASE RETURN BY: May F 1984 PUBLIC 1fORXS APPi.ICAA-r: Mr. Burch Boone on behalf of Lincoln Property Company No. 1055 Limited ADDRESS: 101 Lincoln Centre Drive Foster City, CA 94044 TELEPHONE: (415) 571-2200 " PROPOSAL: To consider the application of Mr.Burch Boone on behalf of Lincoln S 84-11 Property Co. No. 1055 Limited for approval of plans and elevations Boone, B. to allow the construction of a four story office building(140,000 gross sq. ft.) on property known as 2105 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (Gen eral Commercial.,) and R-3-S(Multiple Family Residential/High Density Residential) Zoning District. APN 413-44-72,73,83 DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: CODE REQUIREMENTS: y-+' Kv mot__ S-15T tN ol=t-t c e, 'lt yv 6 • G l6J-Tie iF '-1 Lk ¢Ysu r Bccu.v. b 't� o V"VF— Zl4 - to gL 1::'t7g�-j G�rsN s N ✓ PLANNING COMMISSION 6ITE I ARCHITECTUF-AL REV IE10 COMMITTEE DEPARTMENT COMMLNT SHEET _ ARCHITECT AUILDING DATE: April 26, 1984 FI RE AGENDA: . POLICE PLEASE RETURN EY: Htry t1. 19f34 PUBLIC MORXS APPLICANT : L Mr. Burch Boone on behalf of Lincoln Property Company No. 1055 Limited ADDRESS: 101 Lincoln Centre Drive Foster City, CA 94044 TELEPHONE: . (415) 571-2200 PROPOSAL: ro consider the application of Mr.Burch Boone on behalf of Lincoln S 84-11 Property Co. No. 1055 Limited for approval of glans and elevations Boone, B. to allow the construction of a four story office building(140,000 gross sq. ft.) on property known as 2105 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (Gen eral Commercial) and R-3-S(Multiple family Residential/High Density Residential) Zoning District. APN 413-44-72,73,83 DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS:-/o,� CODE REQUIREMENTS:,.,_ l'� 47 -riW � WF O PLANNING CO" ISSION SITE & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE DEPARTMENT COMMENT SHEET _ ARCHITECT DATE: April 26; 1984 NUILDING AGENDA: not set PIRE POLfCE PLEASE RETURN BY: t May 8, 1984 PUBLIC WORKS APPLICAh7 : Mr. Burch Boone on behalf of Lincoln Property Company No 1055 Limited ADDRESS: 101 Lincoln Centre Drive Foster City, CA 94044 TELEPHONE: . (415) 571-2200 PROPOSAL: To consider the application of Mr -Burch Boone on behalf of Lincoln S 84-11 Property Co. No. 1055 Limited for approval of plans and elevations Boone, B. to allow the construction of a four story office building(14O,OOO gross sq. ft.) on property known as 2105 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (Gen eral Commercial) and R-3-S(Multiple Family Residential/High Density Residential) Zoning District. APN 413-44-72,73,83 DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: CODE REQUIREMENTS:- 11 STAFF CALCULATION SHEET DATE: NAME: ADDRESS: 2 / PROPOSED USE: AGENDA DATE: Y- n FILE NO. JI' APN: ZONE: GROSS LOT AREA: sq.ft. acres NET LOT AREA: sq.ft. __ acres BUILDING AREA BY USE: 1.. 1-2 = 3 p� 2. 3. 4. TOTAL FIRST FLOOR BUILDING AREA: sq.ft. COVERAGE: % of net lot area. TOTAL AMOUNT OF PAVING: sq.ft. _ % of net lot area. LANDSCAPING: CODE: sq.ft. % of net lot area. PROVIDED: sq.ft. % of net lot area. EXISTING LARGE TREES: __Yes ___No SETBACKS: AS PROVIDED Front f Left V Right Rear SEPARATION BETWEEN BUILDINGS: AS PROVIDED BUILDING HEIGHT: \.vrs Building Wall LIE. S.J / TOTAL HEIGHT CODE CODE PARKING SPACES: TYPE AS PROVIDED CODE Regular Compact L Handicap — Total — Covered Uncovered _ PARKING RATIO: PROVIDED CODE PARKING DESIGN: ACCEPTABLE UNACCErTA.BLE Stall Size Driveway Width v T Backup Distance 4-- Distance from Bldgs. Turnaround Area DENSITY (RESIDENTIAL): Total No. cf Units Type and No. of Each AS PROVIDED CODE Units per Gross Acre Units per Zoning Formula _ Open Space — EXISTING SURROUNDING, LAND USES: North: South: East: West The above calculations are intended for Staff review and summaries. These calculations are approximations and should be used as such. Chamber of Commerce y Campbell, California 578-6252 RECEIVED 4F. AUG 151984 ARC on � J F�84 City Council Campbell,Ca 95008 Honorable Gentlemen: Enclosed is the chamber's position on the proposed development of the Lincoln Project on Bascom. This is also our response to the question referred to the Chamber concerning the proposed Construction Tax. /-, Sincerely, / Execu t e Vice President jp 328 E. CampbellAve. 95008 .eo•a►. in the Heart of Santa Clara County -a-a- BUSINESS AFFAIRS COMMITTEE MEETING EMIL VILLA'S - JULY 24, 1984 Burch Boone, representing Lincoln Property Co., presented the proposal for developing the property now occupied by Baker Trailer Sales. The proposed four story building would comprise 140,00 square feet of office space. The property presently is zoned for six stories. The project meets all the zoning requirements and will include traffic mitigating provisions to be borne by the developer. Following discussion on the project, it was recommended (with two abstentions, city representatives), that the project be supported by the Chamber cf Commerce. It was noted that those who purchase property for development based on zoning premises should be allowed their development if it meets zoning demands. The committee also discussed the city's proposed Capital Improvement .41 Construction Tax. The proposed tax would be designated for street improvements. This would equalize the cost of streets and sidewalks with all developers .ather than just the major projects. The rate would vary for residentia: commercial or individual developments. The committee recommends that the Chamber support such a plan. These recommendations have been approved by the Chamber's Board of Directors on August 9, 1984. 072484 PLANNING COMMISSION SITE E ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE DEPARTMENT COMMENT SHEET ARCHITECT BUILDING DATE: April 26, 1984 _ iIRL AGENDA: Ro" POLfCE PLEASE RETURN BY: &Y � ,gyp PUBLIC WOUS r� AppLILM?: Mr. Burch Boone on bendlf of Lincoln Property Company No. 1055 Limited ADDRESS: 101 Lincoln Centre Drive Foster City, CA 94044 TELEPHONE: . (415) 571-2200 PROPOSAL: To consider the application of Mr.Burch Boone on behalf of Lincoln S 84-11 Property Co. No. 1055 Limited for approval of plans and elevations Boone, B. to allow the construction of a four story office building(140,000 gross sq. ft.) on property known as 2105 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (Gen eral Commercial) and R-3-S(Multiple Family Residential/H,gh Density Residential) Zoning District. APN 413-44-72,73,83 DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: I CODE REQUIREMENTS• biAGIO PASSARO ALL SIZE MENS WEAR 4656 PEARL AVE SAN JOSE, CA. 95136 2653232 U HEM REC 1 f% IG 21 1984 AUG 2� B4oF CAMPBELL P NNINU DEPARTMENT. o vam gWN z� A� � Pa��� Z«-& �' ��o-'k 4 t1ci, (l k a tc c Scti, stc o�-�CA �w.�c� � r�t� c�•� 2\OS' S \�c�s`o... %P1`. Zc. w. �sc�_•�\ `off �.0 \��a\ UUw.�.�,��-s e,s-� e�,�..� -� t�a,.p,� "�-•G �-^� ^M vc-A S G�C+c�w r�, c.1� � V„O G S i.O w�'r TL�Q ck.vc�o� � � L � •- w� � � ^-�� er � e s � C ov,\ c9. v�� I i j del n, �' WOw�G W� Vti 0.CJ\� \� SttiC,� \� b�c� =•'K DFv�{'S '40 E r ��v August 10, 1984 RECEIVEn J. Robert Dempster AUG 131984 City Attorney CR awl an City of Campbell 75 N. Central Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 Dear Mr. Dempster: Thank you for your reply dated Aucust 1 in response to my letter to Mr. Arth Kee. Since my comments reference your letter by paragraph I have attached a copy. Your first paragraph refers to the Municipal Code Section 21.16.020 paragrap on hotels, hospitals plus schools and states their need for 'a great deal of parking.... if constructed in an R3 zone', It does not say office building parking for office building. Yet, your second paragrpah concludes that the R3 zone may be used for parkin for an adjacent C2 zone office building. Tt does not say hotel, hospital or school. Thus, it appears that you are basically interpreting the R3 zone to include parking not associated with R3 uses! I do not see how you arrive at that conclusion from the argument presented. As you are well aware of, the Topanga V. County of Los Angeles decision mandated very specific requirements for findings of fact. Are you implying that Topanga does not apoly here? In your third paragraph you disavow Section 21.08. Then why is a Use Permit being requested for 'parking as a transitional use"? Thank you for your prompt attention. Sincerely, John Figueroa 3404 Ridge:.ant Drive Mountain View, CA 94040 cc: City Council City Manager Planning Director CITY OF CAMPOCLL PLANNIN13 OCPARTMENT CITY OF CAMPBELL 75 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE CAM PBEL L, CALIFORNIA 95008 1408i 378-8141 Department: City Attorney August 1, 1984 Mr. John Figueroa 3404 Ridgemont Drive Mountain View, CA 94040 RE: 2105 S. Bascom Ave. - Lincoln Property Co. Dear W. Figueroa: This letter is in response to your letter of July 26, 1984 directed to Mr. Arthur Kee. In discussing this matter with the Campbell Planning Depart- ment, Staff's position is that Campbell Municipal Code Section 21.16.020 allows hotels, hospitals, high schools, elementary schools --which neces- sarily would include a great deal of parking if such buildings were con- structed in an R-3 zone. Therefore, it is the Staff's position that, in the Lincoln Property application, the R-3 portion of the property may be used as a parking facility for the adjacent office building being proposed. The Staff in no way is concerning itself with Campbell Municipal Code Section 21.08 in the application involving Lincoln Property Co. If you }love any additional questions in regards to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact the City Attorney's office (252-1111) to discuss them. Very truly yours, J. RDBERT DEMPSTER t� CITY ATTORNEY JRD.ld Cc: City Council City Manager Planning Director 1 W August 1984 Mayor Doetsch and City Councilmembers RECEIVED City of Campbell T5 North Central Avenue AUG 1 4 1984 Campbell, California 95008 m an M WE OBJECT to the proposed 4-story, 140,000 sq ft office building, and the 2-level, 5T4 car parking structure to be located between South Bascom Avenue and Michael Drive, BECAUSE of: 1. The loss of residential land needed for housing in our comunity. 2. The increased traffic congestion on S. Bascom and nearby streets. 3. The intrusion of office par'cing in a residential area. NAME ADDRESS/CITY .................., ++.w August 1984 Mayor Doetsch and City Councilmembers City of Campbell T5 North Central Avenue Campbell, California 95008 HE OBJECT to the proposed 4-stor,, 140,000 sq ft office building, and the 2-level, 574 car parking structure to be located between South Bascom Avenue and Michael Drive, BECAUSE of: 1. The loss of residential land needed for housing in our comunity. P. The increased traffic congestion on S. Bascom and nearby streets. 9 i atrusion of office parking in a residential a:ea. i ,QNAME ADDRESS/CITY 1 AW U.o.ah f9u C(Af) too Urn n: 4", 4t3I i. August 1964 Mayor Doetsch and City Councilmembers City of Campbell 75 North Central Ave:we Campbell, California 95008 WE OBJECT to the proposed 4-story, 140,000 sq ft office building, and the 2-level, 574 car parking structure to be located between South Bascom Avenue and Michael Drive, BECAUSE of: 1. The loss of residential land needed for housing in our comunity. S. The increased traffic congestion on S. Bascom and nearby streets. 3. The intrusion of office parking in a residential area. NAME i e. ADDRESS/CITY - "t4 , W MA uuUt �- bQ b J August 1984 Aayor Doetsch and City Councilmembers City of Campbell 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, California 95008 WE OBJECT to the proposed 4-story, 140,000 aq ft office building, and the 2-level, 574 car parking structure to be located between South Bascom Avenue and Michael Drive, BECAUSE of: 1. The loss of residential land needed for housing in our comunity. 2. The increased traffic congestion on S. Bascom and nearby streets. 3. The intrusion of office parking in a residential area. NAME ADDRESS/CITY .a s&� I&,e. B✓ l���ri/ l�1 Cv l� a�1(i aol 24 cr hark ?! 3 �g..�.La.U, 20I RCN E�— a C4w1Pe6z 1l� aukA( f OAK3 - Cr too 0"oxl ,� Aor 4 ir�MGBF� • J August 1984 Mayor Doets ch and City Councilmembers City of Campbell 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, California 95008 WE OBJECT to the proposed 4-story, 140,000 sq ft office building, and the 2-le•el, 574 car parking structure to be located between South Bascom Avenue and Michael Drive, BECLUSE of: 1. The loss of residential land needed for housing in our comunity. 2. The increased traffic congestion on S. Bascom and nearby streets. 3. The intrusion of office parking .n a residential area. NAME ADDRESS/CITY M 02 & : dr -9�3- 1 August 1984 Mayor Doetsch and City Councilmembers City of Campbell 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, California 95008 WE OBJECT to the proposed 4-story, 140,000 sq ft office building, and the 2-level, 574 car parl.ing structure to be located between South Bascom Avenue and Michael Drive, BECAUSE of: 1. The loss of residential land needed for housing in our comunity. 2. The increased traffic congestion on S. Bascom and nearby streets. 3. The intrusion of office parking in a residential area. NAME ADDRESS/CITY l 1 f^ads 3z ramal�lt q ,� f1I C.9sa11� [ CGt ,rGru� r ns� r 7lo Mi c.(i,t L,,� LFI„� � (,CLT� 9s�g T r A r.4 <. S 'X>,, c� ��� J . cA s-S-' / zor r7,u(4 D.. -'A-/ JOl 1�1. CcJ /u•.vnC�v3[/ c.0 9S Ae August 1984 Mayor Doetsch and City Councilmembers City of Campbell 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, California 95008 WE OBJECT to the proposed 4-story, 140,000 sq ft office building, and the 2-level, 574 car parking structure to be located between South Bascom Avenue and Michael Drive, BECAUSE of: 1. The loss of residential land needed for housing in our comunity. 2. The increased traffic congestion on S. Bascom and nearby streets. 3. The intrusion of office_ parking in a residential area. ��. WAVY" i !/ 201 r��cHac.�. Oa"f�a Ca�?6Eu. 1 CA", Par t August 1984 Mayor Doetsch and City Councilmembers City of Campbell - T5 North Central Avenue Campbell, California 95008 WE OBJECT to the proposed 4-story, 140,000 sq ft office building, and the 2-level, 574 car parking structure to be located between South Bascom Avenue and Michael Drive, BECAUSE of: 1. The loss of residential land needed for housing in our comunity. 2. The increased traffic congestion on S. Bascom and nearby streets. 3. The intrusion of office parking in a residential area. 0 WAMF AnnAFCc/f TTV August 1984 Mayor Doetsch and City Councilmembers City of Campbell T5 North Central Avenue Campbell, California 95008 HE OBJECT to the proposed 4-story, 140,000 sq ft office building, and the 2-level, 574 car parking structure to be located between South Bascom Avenue and Michael Drive, BECAUSE of: 1. The lose, of residential land needed for housing in our comunity. 2. The increased traffic congestion on S. Bascom and nearby streets. 3. The intrusion of office parking in a residential area. ��- J LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY I CITY C,'-- L,atgi= =LL PANNING OEPAPrmENT 10 August 1984 Mr. Arthur Kee CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 No. First Street Campbell, CA 95008 Re: 2105 So. Bascom Ave. Dear Art: Enclosed are the three story plans for the Baker Trailer Sales project. You'll note that the first page shows a parking ratio of 1 to 250 which assumes that the variance parking is granted and the second page, P-1-A reflects at a 1 to 225 parking ratio. The difference is that additional light wells penetrating the elevated deck and the lower level will be used for landscaping. Per discussions that I have had with several of the Councilmen, they will support the project with the three story height restriction. I am assuming that approval of the four story building subject to its being reduced to three stories and subject to architectural and site committee approval is a condition that we need to proceed with approval of the project. This represents our plans and i would like to have you circulate these plans to the various City agencies that need to review them so that we could be on the architectural and site approvals agenda for August 28th. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, VtJ—� Burch Boone Partner BB:br Enclosures 101 Lincoln Centre Drive Foster City, CA 94404 (415) S71-2200 CITY OF CAMPREll 75 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE CAM P B E LL, CA LI F 0 R N I A 95008 1408) 378 8141 Department: City Clerk WYM F nr PPADTnrr August 13, 1984 Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Campbell has set the hour of 7:30 p.m., or shortly thereafter, on Tuesday, August 21, 1984 in the City Hall Council Chambers, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California as the time and place for hearing to consider the application of Mr. Burch Boone, on behalf of Lincoln Property Co., for approval of plans and elevations to allow the construction of a 4-story office building on property known as 2105 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) and R-3-S (Multiple Family Residential) Zoning District. UP 84-08/S 84-11 Map and legal description of subject property is on file in the Office of the Planning Department, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. Interested persotls may appear and be heard at said hearing. CITY OF CMiPBELL ANNE G. COYNE CITY CLERK DATE MAILED AUG 131'Jtl4 IV "U 54 E CAMPBELL - P.M. AVE 326 m 20 PM 500V 53 P.M. 500-M-7 L.t"ArL OR 12 Z E7 -MAW-ILM CT f-2 100 �I0 AC NET I Pm LU 450- M M,CHA M` DR I IS j-L2'T PRICOT T.2 67 1) n CITY (IF CAMPHILL 75 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE CAMPBELL, CA L I F 0 R N I A 95008 14081 378 8141 Department: City Attorney August 1, 1984 Mr. John Figueroa 3404 Ridgemont Drive hbuntain View, CA 94040 RE: 2105 S. Bascom Ave. - Lincoln Property Co. Dear Mr. Figueroa: This letter is in response to your letter of July 26, 1984 directed to Mr. Arthur Kee. In discussing this matter with the Campbell Planning Depart- ment, Staff's position is that Campbell Thmicipal Code Section 21.16.020 allows hotels, hospitals, high schools, elementary schools --which neces- sarily would include a great deal of parking if such buildings were con- structed in an R-3 zone. Therefore, it is the Staff's position that, in the Lincoln Property application, the R-3 portion of the property may be used as a parking facility for the adjacent office building being propesed. The Staff in no way is concerning itself with Campbell Municipal Code Section 21.08 in the application involving Lincoln. Property Co. If you have any additional questions in regards to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact the City Attorney's office (252-1111) to discuss them. Very truly yours, liJ. ROBERT DEMPSTER f� CITY ATTORNEY JRD:Id cc: City Cotaicil City Manager Planning Director n July 26, 1984 Arthur Kee Planning Director 75 N. Central Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 SUBJECT: Commercial Parking on R3 Zoning Ref. 2015 S. Bascom Avenue, Proposed Lincoln Property Office Project Dear Mr. Kee: At the July 10, 1984 Environmental Planning Commission Public Hearing on the Proposed project at 2015 S. Bascom Avenue one of the questions I raised was whether, under Campbell's current zoning ordinance requirements, all of the project's commercial parking could occupy essentially all of the land zoned R3 as a transitional use. Mr. Dempster, the City Attorney, present at the Planning Commission meeting stated that although the zoning ordinance R3 Section references R1 zoning which states specific limitations on the amount of parking permissable, he concurred With Phil Stafford that it was reasonable to interpret the zoning ordinance to allow commercial parking on all of the land zoned multi -family. Mr. Dempster offered to meet me, jointly with you, so that he could explain the basis for his interpretation. However, due to other commitments I was unable to schedule a meeting prior to the City Council meeting of July 17, 1984 when this proposal was before the Council. As you are aware, the City Council continued this item until the meeting of August 21, 1984. Because of this additional time available I feel we could best expedite a joint meeting if I had the City Attorney's basis for interpretation in writing so that I may be properly prepared for said meeting. Section 21.16.020 of the Campbell zoning ordinance addresses R3 Multiple Family Districts. Section (1)-(10) lists all of the permissable uses and Section (11) states "Uses customarily incidental to any of the above uses --Same as the R1 District". We were advised that Section (11) is the part that allows parking on this land zoned R3 with a Use Permit, and I was referred to Section 21.08.030 of the R1 Single -Family District that lists uses permitted with a Use Permit. Yes, it does list Transitional uses of property for parking where R1 lot side line abuts upon a lot in a C or M District. However, it continues on to say "Erovided such transitional use does not extend more than one hundred feet from the boundary of the less restricted district which it adjoins". I have reviewed and had others review Chapter 21.08 of the Zoning Ordinance and have not been able to find anything that appears to allow the Planning Depart- ment, the Planning Commission or the City Attorney the ability to go beyond the one hundred (100 ft.) limitation specifically listed in the Zoning Ordinance. Thank you for your prompt attention. (`�Siinn�cerely, c� 7S � hn Figueroa 3404 Ridgemont Drive Mountain View, CA 94040 Copied to: City Council, City Manager, City Attorney CITY OF CAMPBELL 75 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE CAM PBEL L, CA L I F 0 R N I A 95008 (408) 378-8141 Department: Planning DATE: July 6, 1984 TO: Burch Soon Bettye C. Baker Lincoln Froperty Co. c/o Rolland E. Grefe 101 Lincoln Cnetre Dr. 1980 Financial Center Foster City, CA 94044 Des Dins, IA S 84-11 FILE NO: UY 84-08 ADDRESS: 210S S. Bascom Ave. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: 4-story office building SITE & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW APPOINTMENT: Date: Tuesday, July 10, 1984 Time: 10:45 a.m. PLANNING COMMISSION MTG: 7:30 p.m., Tuesday, July 10, 1984 Please be advised that the Architectural Review Committee of the Campbell Planning Commission will review your plans for approval of the above - referenced project at the appointment time noted above, in the North Wing Conference koom, City Hall, 75 North Central Avenue, Campbell, California. The Committee Lhairman will then make recommendation at the regular meet- ing of the Planning Commission which is held at 7:30 p.m. on the above - referenced date, in the City ;all Council Chambers, 75 North Central Avenue, Campbell, California. A copy of the Staff Comment Sheet and recommendation, and the agenda for the Planning Commission meeting are enclosed for your information. It is necessary that you, or your authorized representative, be present at said Architectural Review Committee meeting and the Planning Commission meeting. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact the Planning Department. Sincerely, ART PLANNING DIRECTOR ld Enclosures CITY OF CAMPBELL 75 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE DATE MAILED CAMPBELL, CA L I F 0 R N I A 95008 (408) 378-8141 Ju1. 3 1:64 Department Planning N O T I C E O F H E A R I N G Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Campbell has set the hour of 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, July 10, 1984, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 70 N. First Street, Campbell, California, as the time and place for public hearing to consider the application of Mr. Burch Boone, on behalf of Lincoln Property Co., for a Use Permit to allow parking as a transitional use in an R-3-S (Multiple Family Residential) Zoning District; and for Site approval of plans and elevations to allow the construction of a 4-story office building in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. APN: 413- 44-72, 73, 83. (UP 84-08 F, S 84-11) Map and legal description of subject property are on file in the Office of the Planning Department, 70 N. First Street, Campbell, California. Interested persons may appear and be heard at said hearing. CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING OW.4ISSION SECRETARY J PROOF OF PUBLICATION t 20I5.5 C. C. P. STATE. OF CALIFORNIA. ('ounty of Santa )Tara I am a citizen of the United Stales and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above -entitled matter. 1 am the principal clerk of the printer of the CAMPBELLPRESS 10950 N. Blaney Avc.. Cupertino, California, a newspaper of general circulation, printed every Wednesday in the city of Cupertino, California. County of Santa Clara, and published in city of Campbell, California, County of Santa Clara; and which newspaper has been adjudged a news- paper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Santa Clara. State of California, Case Number 94048; that the notice of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than non-pareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said news paper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to wit: June 27 all in the vear 19— 84 I certify for declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Cupertino. California. this 27�t(h1 Day of June 19 84 Signature IL This space Is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp AD 8237-CP PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF Notice of Heari ng r NOTICEOF NFAWIIIi Notice is hsdW V� t o the rl.r:p Cmrei.ion of dw City of ra*d hasM the hour of 7:30 pp m m Tut dry, July 10. 1A7 it the dq me CwsK] O ft.% A N. Fisk St., Csttpltd. t the "aid PYPsfas rotnrsi0wb tqn M. Btscit Boar, b" of hope PMPWW Ot, . to, a MPamsk to dwv PA. .n asbwrlsadusnnk 3-1 (Mdtiple Ferny ReWilm. tkli zoning l WIM. and Ia Sae eppmaw d Pis. a M ds W dwY dr ixF snuctim of a *wary aMM buMN Isppraair- - M- OOD Q. h. in C-21 trssnwsl C­-W) 2dtip Oiavkx. APN 41344- 72, 73, 83 (U► st-OSB S84-111. hft end Npw ds.+iFsen are m as in sw OKip of pr Awr*0 Ospsiv w , 70 N. Fisk St., Cwtpbd, Cdfo is. asersew psrsww my W pw snd be heal w uld C* GtV d Cenprl //a/ Anhhur A. Kw Pub.: B/2!/81 237-CP J LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY 15 May 1984 Mr. Phil Stafford CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 North First Street Campbell, CA 95008 Re: Baker Trailer Sales - 2105 South Bascom, Campbell r Dear Phil: Enclosed is an executed copy of the planning commission appl-- cation signed by Roland E. Grefe and a copy of the Power of Attorney for Mr. Grefe. I talked to Earth Metrics regarding the additional 24 hour traffic survey, and with the understanding that it will run around $1,200, ask that you authorize the people from Earth Metrics to proceed. I appreciate the City's support and cooperation in helping us with the tight time constraint that we are faced with on this project. Please submit copies of the architectural comments to me as soon as you receive them if any input from us is needed. Sincerely, -t. Burch Boone Partner BB:br Enclosures Uu 1984 0 Cr'ITY pt: CA"SCLL tANNINp DEPARTMENT 101 Lincoln Centre Drive Foster City, CA 94404 (415) 571-2200 CITYOF C A M P R E L L PLAN: I N6 CONN 169 1 ON APPLICATION PLF.I.SF. NOTE: STAFF IS REQUIRED BY STATE: LAW TO NOTIFY APPLICANTS OF 'IFIE MT7, T:C['S� OF THEIR APPLICATIONS. ONLY TIOSE APPLICATIONS WHICH ARE. FOUND TO BE CCTIPL[•TE CAN RE POSTFD ON A PLANNING ODNVISSION AGENDA. DATE: 6 April 1984 FILE NO: 413-44-72; 413-44-73; PROPERTY LOCATION: Baker Trailer Sales APN: 413-44-83 _ _2105 so. Bascom Ayenne ramphPI1, cA ZONING: C-2 and R-3 APPLICATION: X Architectural Approval Ilse Permit Planned Development Permit Zone Change General Plan Amendment Variance Other: Burch Boone, Partner APPLICANT: Lincoln Property Company No. 1055 Limited, a California Partnership Name; Telephone: (415) 571-2200 Address: 101 Lincoln Centre Drive City/State: Foster City, CA Zip: 94044 ------------------------------------- PROPERTY OWNER: Bettye C. Baker Name: c/o Rolland E. Grefe Telephone: (51s�0 Address: IgAn F' anrial renter City/State: Des Moines, Iowa Zip: 50309 ---------------------------------- I/We the Undersigned person(s) having an interest in the above described property hereby make the above application(s) in accordance with the pro- visions of the Campbell Pinicipal Code, and I/We hereby certify that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my/our know- ledge and belief. ��_/�/�� pliant S,gnatture REc. ► 11'. A' 1`181 AIR. CITY OF CAMPIJELI_ per an r gna Arc to PLANNING DEPAf2'i t", f_fJT / // y RECORDING REOUESTED BY WMEN .ECORDEC MAiE TO Kr �1 S*.r Fr .00RFu s+.Te L CITY ELL PLAN'_. -:?1T - SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE) DOWER OF ATTORNEY SPECIAL KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT.: That I, _ BETTYE C. BAKER , the undersigned (jointly and severally it more than one. hereinafter collte lively "principal"). hereby make, constitute and appoint ROLLAND E. GREFE Ilk principal's true and lawful attorney to act for principal and in pwicipal's name, place and stead and for principal's use and benefit: (a)To do any and all acts necessary to consummate the sale of the real property located in the County of Sanca Clara, State of California, described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and in- corporated herein, including but not limited to negotiating and approving terms and conditions of sale, preparing and signing escrow documents and amendments thereto, signing deeds or any other documents necessary to clear title and/or complete said sale. He is also authorized to direct the distribution of funds from the -ale of said property to his trust account for my benefit. H s also authorized to prepare and to execute any California death tax returns in regard to the death of my husband, JAMES G. M. BAKER, and to obtain any releases of tax liens on the subject property and execute an Affidavit - Death of Joint Tenant for the subject property. Principal hereby grants to said attorney in fact full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing which may be necessary, or convenient, in connection with any of the foregoing, as fully, to all intents and purposes, as principal might or could do it personally present, hereby ratifying and confirming ail that our said attorney in fact shall lawfully do or cause to be done by authority hereof. Wherever the context so requires, the singular number includes the plural. WITNESS my hand this 3iy!� day of _Februa v 1 19 84 r BETT C. BAKER STATE OF CALIFORNIA I af. COUNTY OF On This 3 _ day of Febru aYY' in the year 12$i. Before RG, the undersigned. A Netsry ►YaRC In and torm-dStaff. personally appeared BETTYE C. BAKER _ personally known to the for paned to IN on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to to the person._ whose wne. i S subscribed to The wRNn Instrument, and acknowledged to me that ohs_ eaacuted R. WITNESS my hand and official sal. OFFICIAL SEAL KEOF_ 14 O SOLEAL �.' �_ 1� dw rsE couhn MY comet. eapra AIIG 30, IaG �. Nt'ary Pudic In and M said State. nw.y ••++e .nnu rn ,uay b-..,..,ern.nor.�w.+i., wraorr.s. ri.wr +r.+wn�.r.r� 1 OUBLIC dEARIING MAILING LABELS Please type mailing labels for the attached list of parcel numbers. FORMAT Top 3/4": F��iil!l��e# � S1-(� Applicant: P.C. Mtg.: A.P. 1..: 1�3 - LABELS SHOULD INCLUDE Name (First names first) Address City, State, 6 Zip Code A.P.N. NEEDED BY: �-" DISTRIBUTION 1. Original Labels - Mail 2. Copied labels - One copy for CC for mailing* (Hold in file until P.C. takes action) 3. Copy of labels - In file 4. Copy of labels - Recording Secretary 5. Copy of labels - City Clerk* (Hold in file until P.C. takes action) *Omit for Use Perm.ts and Variances IV CITY OF CAMPBELL 75 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE CAMPBELL, CA L I F 0 R N I A 95008 (408) 378-8141 Department: Planning May 4, 1984 RECEIVED MAY - 71984 BURCH BOONE Mr. Burch Boone Lincoln Property Co. 101 Lincoln Center Dr. Foster City, CA 94044 RE: EARTH METRICS PROPOSAL B8686 OUR FILE NUMBER S 84-11 2105 S BASCOM AVENUE, CAMPBELL Dear Mr. Boone: This office is in receipt of a proposal by Earth Metrics, Inc. to prepare a focl.;ed Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the refer- enced project. A copy of the proposal, including the scope of work and the cost involved, is attached for your records. The city staff is satisfied that the scope of work indicated in the proposal is sufficient to adequately address the environmental impacts of this project. If you agree with this proposal and want the city to authorize the consultant to proceed, it will be necessary for you to deposit the total amotnt of $12,750.00 with the city. The city will then dis- burse the funds to the consultant as work is completed. You will re- ceive an account of the actual disbursement. It should be noted that if the Planning Commission and/or City Council require further analysis of the project's impact, then .ditional funds may be re- quired to complete the additional work. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to call. Very truly yoirs, ARTHUR A. KEE PI"I NGD I RECTOR sHdLDIT PRINCIPAL Rb PJS:lj Encl. c: EarthMetrics, Inc. 0 otsl earth metrics inc rporated May 1, 1984 Mr. Philip Stafford Principal Planner City cf Campbell 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, CA Subject: Lincoln Property Office Project EIR; Earth. Metrics Proposal B8686 Dear Phil: Earth Metrics offers to prepare Focused Draft and Final Environmental Impact Reports for the Lincoln Property Company 144,000 square foot office project in the City of Campbell for a firm fixed price of $12,750.00. The traffic analysis will be performed by Wilson -Porter Engineering, who has a registered traffic engineer on staff. All work will be performed in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended, and guidelines issued thereto by the State Secretary of Resources and the City of Campbell. Earth Metrics is in an excellent position to perform the proposed work since we have prior experience with environmental analysis in the City of Campbell including preparation of two recent Environmental Impact Reports, both of which dealt extensively with traffic issues. Details of the proposed work are set forth in Exhibit A, Statement of Work and Exhibit B, Schedule. The terms of this offer will remain firm for a period of 30 days after which they are subject to revision. Our receipt of this letter oountersigned by you will constitute our authorization to proceed. If you have need for further information regarding this offer, please contact me. 1 C. Michael Ho;zft.D. President Authorization to Proceed Date CMH/LL cc: Mr. Burch Boone Lincoln Property Company COWAN ROAD. BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010 14151 697 7103 Earth Metrics will perform the following tanks: 1. Analyze the technical topics of surface transportation, visual impact, housing, land use, storm and sanitary sewer analysis including existing setting, impacts, and mitigation measures. 2. Traffic analysis will include calculation of trip generation, trip distribution and a.m. and p.m. peak hour level of service calculations for 14 separate intersections as listed below. - Bascom and Union Avenues - Bascom and Campbell Avenues - Bascom and Campial - Bascom and Hamilton - Bascom and Camden - Bascom and Dry Creek - Hamilton and Hwy. 17 - Hamilton and Leigh - Hamilton and Selmer - Campbell and Union - Camden and Hwy. 17 - Arroyo Seco and Bascom - E1 Solyo and Bascom - Shady Dale and Bascom i One level of service calculation method approached by the city will be used. The cumulative traffic analysis will consist of the existing conditions, plus the project, plus the effects of the Ainaley, Prometheus, and Campbell Business Park projecte which have been approved but are not yet constructed. Only one cumulative scenario will be addressed. 3. visual analysis will consist of photographic presentation of four to six views of the site from nearby locations. The analysis will also address a discussion of shadow formation, visual change and comparison of visual impact of this proposed facility to other area structures. 4. Land use analysis will relate the project to the General Plan and underlying zoning. Relate to housing stock impact due to present General Plan designation. 5. Storm drainage and sanitary sewer analysis. 6. Prepare project desrription, mandatory Cb,A sections, and project alter- natiies analysis. Alternatives will consist of no project (required by CEQA) and a mixed use alternative (residential and oommercial). 7. Any additional analysis will require an amendment to this agreement with the additional scope and cost to be mutually agreed upon by the city, Earth Metrlca, and the applicant. SKA IAZT B WORK PR DUCTS AND SC1 k1ULE The following work products will be prepared: Administrative Draft Environmental Impact Report (ADEIR) for review by Lincoln Properties and the City of Campbell Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) Final Environmental Impact Report WEIR) The following schedule for work will apply: ITEM D► E _ April 25, 1984 + Receipt of all background data from Lincoln Properties relative to the Campbell project. Payment due for 15 percent of the contract va:ue. Delivery of the ADEIR in four May 14, 1984 copies. Payment due for 60 percent of the contract value. Receipt of all written comments in May 18, 1984 one copy from Lincoln Properties and the City of Campbell. Delivery of the DEIR in ;10 copies May 25, 1984 Payment due for 15 percent of the contract value. Delivery of the FEIR in 20 copies In addendum form. Payment due for 14 days after receipt of 10 perxnt of the contract value. all written comments Attendance at a maximum of two Planning Commission, June 26, public meeting. 1984 and/or as required The proposed work does not include any production of color graphics or drafting of a site plan; however, our staff will be available to provide such services, if required, on a time and materials basis. Lincoln Properties will provide to Earth Metrics an 8 1/2 by 11 inch, camera ready base map suitable for use in the environmental documents. If material changes in the site plan or traffic generation art, proposed during the course of the above soahedule, Earth Metrics reserves the right to modify this schedule. .-.0M]1 earth metrics incorporated May 1, 1984 Mr. Philip Stafford Principal Planner City of Campbell 75 North Central Avenue Campbell, CA Subject: Lincoln Property Office Project EIR; Earth Metrica Proposal BC686 Dear Phil: Earth Metrics offers to prepare Focused Draft and Final Environmental Impact Reports for the Lincoln Property Company 144,000 square foot office project in the City of Campbell for a firm fixed price of $12,750.00. The traffic analysis will be performed by Wilson -Porter Engineering, who has a registered traffic engineer on staff. All work will be performed in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended, and guidelines issued thereto by the State Secretary of Resources and the City of Campbell. Farth Metrics is in an excellent position to perform the proposed work since we have prior experience with environmental analysis in the City of Campbell including preparation of two recent Environmental Impact Reports, both of which dealt extensively with traffic issues. Details of the proposed work are set forth in Exhibit A, Statement of Work and Exhibit B, Schedule. The terms of this offer will remain firm for a period of 30 days after which they are subject to revision. Our receipt of this letter countersigned by you will constitute our authorization to proceed. If you have need for further information regarding this offer, please contact me. Sincerely, IN C. MichaelBo�>6.D. President Authorization to Proceed Date CMH/LL cc: Mr. Burch Boone Lincoln Property Company 859COWANROAD. BURLINGAME CALIFORNIA94010 (41515977103 1 Earth Metrics will perform the following tasks: 1. Analyze the technical topics of surface transportation, visual impact, housing, land use, storm and sanitary sewer analysis including existing setting, impacts, and mitigation measures. 2. Traffic analysis will include calculation of trip generation, trip distribution and a.m. and p.m. peak hour level of service calculations for 14 separate intersections as listed below. - Bascom and Union Avenues - Bascom and Campbell Avenues - Bascom and Campisi - Bascom and Hamilton - Bascom and Camden - Bascom and Dry Creek Y - Hamilton and Hwy. 17 - Hamilton and Leigh - Hamilton and Selmer - Campbell and Union - Camden and Hwy. 17 - Arroyo Seco and Bascom - El Solyo and Bascom - Shady Dale and Bascom One level of service calculation method approached by the city will be used. The cumulative traffic analysis will consist of the existing conditions, plus the project, plus the effects of the Ainsley, Prometheus, and Campbell Business Park projects which have been approved but are not yet constructed. Only one cumulative scenario will be addressed. 3. visual analysis will consist of photographic presentation of four to six views of the site from nearby locations. The analysis will also address a discussion of shadow formation, visual change and comparison of visual impact of this proposed facility to other area structures. 4. Land use analybie will relate the project to the General Plan and underlying zoning. Relate to lioueing stock impact due to present General Plan designation. 5. Storm drainage and sanitary sewer analysis. 6. Prepare project description, mandatory CEQA sections, and E.-cJect alter- natives analysis. Alternatives will consist of no project .required by CEQA) and a uixed use alternative (residential and oomm,. — ,l). 7. Any additional analysis will require ao amendment to thie agreement with the additional scope and cost to be mutually agre4' "pon by the city, Earth Metrlos, and the applicant. She following work products will be prepared: Administrative Draft Environmental Impact Report (ADEIR) for review by Lincoln Properties and the City of Campbell Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) The following schedule for work will apply: ITEM Receipt of all background data DATE April 25, 1984 from Lincoln Properties relative Y to the Campbell project. Payment due for 15 percent of the contract value. Delivery of the ADEIR in four May 14, 1984 copies. Payment due for 60 percent of the contract value. Receipt of all written comments in May 18, 1984 one copy from Lincoln Properties and the City of Campbell. Delivery of the DEIR in 30 copies May 25, 1984 Payment due for 15 percent of the contract value. Delivery of the FEIR in 20 copies in addendum form. Payment due for 14 days after receipt of j 10 percent of the oontrPct value. all written comments Attendance at a maximum of two Planning Commission, June 26, public meeting. 1984 and/or as required The proposed work does not include any production of color graphics or drafting of a site plan; however, our staff will be available to provide such services, if required, on a time and materials basis. Lincoln Properties will provide to Earth Metrica an 8 1/2 by 11 inch, camera ready base map suitable for use in the environmental documents. If material changes in the site plan or traffic generation are proposed during the courea of the above schedule, Earth Metrice reserves the right to modify this schedule. LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY April 10, 1984 Mr. 11hi) tafford CITY CAMPBELL 70 N. First Street Campbell, CA 95008 Re: S 84-11, 2105 S. Bascom Revenue Account #337, Fund No. A Dear Mr. Stafford: Enclosed please `ind several photos of the above site to complete our application made 4/9/84. Should you have any questions or require further information, please don't hesitate to give me a call. Sincerely, LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY Burch Boone Partner BB:dc Enclosures RMOVED APR lU 1984 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNIND DEFwRTMENT 101 Lincoln Centre Dnve Fos:.. Gay, CA 94404 (415) 571-2200 0 MEMORANDUM _ _ CITY OF CAMPBE To: WALLY BYRON, BUILDING OFFICIAL Date: APRIL 9, 1984 JIM WMULLIN, FIRE CHIEF JOE ELLIOTT, PUBLIC AORKS DIRECTOR From: ART. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR Subject: S 84-11 (2105 S. BASCOM AVE.) the planning Department has received a Site and Architectural application proposing the construction of a 4-story office building on the site currently occupied by Baker Trailer Sales. The proposed office building will accom o4ate approximately 140,000 sq.ft. of office floor space. Due to the scale and the location of this project, the Planning Department is arranging a meeting to discuss preliminary concerns and impacts which would result from the development of this proposal. Following this discussion, the Planning Department will prepare an environmental impact assessment for this project. Concerns that you may have could be addressed in the preparation of a focused EIR. Your attendance, or a representative's attendance, would be appreciated at this meeting. The sched,sed meeting will be held the he Planning Co ence Room at 10. Monday, ld April 16, 1984. A copy proposed P areyour re- view. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. AAK:TJH:ld ATTAGW NT: Plans n MEMORANDUM To: WALLY BYRON, BUILDING OFFICIAL Date: APRIL 9, 1984 JIM W-HJLLEN, FIRE CHIEF JOE ELLIOTT, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR From: ART KEE, PLANNING DIRECTOR CITY OF CAMPBELL Subject: S 84-11 (210S S. BASCOM AVE.) ---------------------------------------------------------- The Planning Department has received a Site and Architectural application proposing the construction of a 4-story office building on the site currently occupied by Baker Trailer Sales. The proposed office building will accommodate approximately 140,000 sq.ft. of office floor space. Ate to the scale and the loation of this project, the Planning Department is arranging a meeting to dis,uss preliminary concerns and impacts which would result from the development of this proposal. Following this discussion, the Planning Department will prepare an environmental impact assessment for this project. Concerns that you may have could be addressed in the preparation of a focused EIR. Your attendance, or a representative's attendance, would be appreciated at this meeting. The scheduled meetingg will be held in the Planning Conference Room at 10:00 a.m., M�ttday, April 16, 1984, A copy of the proposed plans are attached for your re- view. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact this office. AAK: TJFI: ld ATTAQ04W: Plans ® A Y WI%t' JveG 6r AAA- �o 4LLI-1 v Go LL 1 CITYOF C A M P B E L L PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION' CxaY , 3y' PLEASE MOTE: STAFF IS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW TO NOTIFY APPLICANTS OF THE CMTE71 S OF THEIR APPLICATIONS. ONLY TIDSE APPLICATIONS WHICH ARE FOUND TO BE COMPLETE CAN BE POSTED ON A PLANNING CNflISSION AGENDA. [` I; DATE: 6 April 1984 FILE NO: 413-44-72; 413-44-73;= PROPERTY IOCATION: Baker Trailer Sales APN: 413-44-83 l •"= 2705 So. Bascom Avenues ramnhatl rA ZONING: C-2 and R-3 'S _--__-------------------------------- APPLICATION: X Architectural Approval Ilse Permit Planned Development Permit Zone Change 1 General Plan Amendment Variance Other: I Buren Boone, Partner APPLICANT: Lincoln Property Company No. 1055 Limited, a California Partnership Name: Telephone: (415) 571-2200 Address: 101 Lincoln Centre Drive City/State: Foster City, CA Zip: 94044 ---------------------------- PROPERTY OWNER — Bettye C. Baker Nam: c/o Rolland E. Grefe Telephone: Address: 19Rn F;na, ai C ro ' i City/State: Des Moines,Iowa Zip: ------------------------------------- I/We the undersigned person(s) having an interest in the above described property hereby make the above application(s) in accordance with the pro- visions of the Campbell Municipal Code, and I/Ile hereby certify that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my/our know- ledge and belief. c > Applfinn t Signature /]late REC.0 ANT. Property Owner Signature Date INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED BV APPLICANT I. EaVirOnmettat L160mation Form. 2. Desctiption c6 acqucit/prcpvsat. 3 A b-tie6 a —WAY e6 project (8',"x 11" 60-1). 3. Legal De6en.iption (attach one o6 the 6otlowingl: y .: a.. PitetiminaA.y Title Report b. Photo Copy o6 Deed c. Recorded A1ap J. Names and add -teases o6 individuals who, in addition to the applicant mid oumcr, should receive agenda i16-mation and sta66 repurta. 5. Applicant must attach Give (5) copies o6 site plans, elevations, and 6teot plan indicating use o6 building i, square 6e0tage. (76 pnvpeA.ty abuts laid ouxned bil (fie Santa Clara Valley Water Disruct, the applicant must attach six (6) copies o6 the site plans, elevations and 6loor plan.; (SEE CHECK SHEET OF ITEAS( 6. PLANNED DEVELOP'IENT PEUIT ONLV: Devetopm-ent Schedule - A written etateme;t gtvcng 7e latest date a tort ct�ow�apprtov , on which conntAucti— win£ begii a:d date by w-TtMz mptevements wi.0 be completed (BY' x 71" 6ctmat). 1. FILING FEE: SEE ATTACHED FEE SCHEDULE. 8. PARK DEDICATION: .Residential projects which involve a subdivision of land may be affected by the City of Campbell's Park Dedication Requirements (Chapter 20.22 Campbell Municipal Code). Please check with the Planning or Public Works Departments to determine the impact of these Park Dedication Requirements on your pro,•'ect. APPLICANTS: Attention is especiatty called to the kimpottaime beAn present at public hear,inaa. The burden oT pruacntung Ito *Tie-PZ—anncn'g�mnis6ion is on the Y ttcant and 6aitune to be present at a hearing may adverse y a ect the applicant's chancea o6 obtaining the development he/she tequ¢ata. 7/1; 81 ti STAFF CALCULATION SHEET DATE: AGENDA DATE: NAME: FILE NO. ADDRESS: APN: PROPOSED USE: ZONE: GROSS LOT AREA: sq.ft. acres NET LOT AREA: sq.ft. acres BUILDING AREA BY USE: 1. 2. i 3. ib- 4. TOTAL FIRST FLOOR BUILDING AREA: sq.ft. COVERAGE: % of net lot area. TOTAL AMOUNT OF PAVING: sq.ft. % of net lot area. LANDSCAPING: CODE: sq.ft. % of net lot area. PROVIDED: sq.ft. % of net lot area. EXISTING LARGE TREES: Yes No I SETBACKS: AS PROVIDED CODE Front Left Right Rear SEPARATION BETWEEN BUILDINGS: AS PROVICZD CODE BUILDING HEIGHT: Building Wall TOTAL HEIGHT PARKING SPACES: TYPE AS PROVIDED Regular Compact Handicap Total Covered Uncovered CODE PARKING RATIO: PROVIDED CODE _ PARKING DESIGN: ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE Stall Size Driveway Width Backup Distance Distance from Bldgs. Turnaround Area DENSITY (RESIDENTIAL): Total No. of Units Type and No. of Each _ AS PROVIDED CODE Units per Gross :Acre Units per Zoning Formula Open Space _ EXISTING SURROUNDING LAND USES: North: South: -- East: --- West --- — The above calculations are intended for Staff review and summaries. These calculations are approximations and should be used as such. i J I 1-1� /-11 RECEIPT CITY OF CAMPBELL CAMPBELL. CALIFORNIA NAME ADDRE ce a� - FOR J p i a\osa�e� REVFN UEACCOUNTNO J 7 J 1 ' FUNDNUMBER � I�. - 4 0 Ur1 �J CHECIt MONEVORDER CA5H �.31J DATE AMOUNT THIS EKEIPt MUST EE MACHINE VALIDATED AND SIGNED mow. 221;85 h1 CITIZEN COPV TWMY Y- "^ae•. CITY OF CAMPBELL ENVIRCINMENTAI- IMPACT ASSESSMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CNE CRLIST TO SE USED ■Y THE CITY OF CAMPSELL IN MAKING INITIAL STUDY 1 . 8A1:Q'g0t 4D 1 NAME OF PROPONENT: BURC:H B(X)NF,/LINCOLN PROPFRTTES ' ADDRESS OF PROPONENT: 101 LINCOLN CFNTFR T)R Tx1STFR CITY CA 94044 TELEPHONE: (41S ) S71-2200 DATE OF CHECKLIST SUBMITTED: April 16, 1984 f AGENCY REQUIRING CHECKLIST: CITY OF CAMPBELL NAME OF PROPOSAL (IF APPLICABLE): P L J 11. ENVIROMMENTAL IMPACTS (EXPLANATIONS OF ALL 3EFLj AND M&YRL ANS-It ANE REOUIRCD ON ATTACHED YEf MAYSC SHEET) NO 1. EARTH. will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? ❑ ❑ %9C I b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil :']C ❑ ❑ c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? ❑ ❑ �C d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? ❑ ❑ e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? ci ❑ f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? ❑ ❑ - W g. Exposure of peopl- or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? ❑ ❑ 1 of 6 pages I res rwvse wo 2. AIR. will proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? ❑ b. The creation of objectionable odors? ❑ C. Alteration of air movement, moisture or tempera- ture, or any change in climate, either locally ❑ or regionally? 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? ❑ b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? ❑ C. Alterations to the course or flow Of flood waters? ❑ d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? ❑ e. Discharge into surface waters, or in any altera- tion of surface water quality, including but not limited to 'emperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? ❑ f. Alteration to the direction or rate of flow of" ground -waters? ❑ g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through di.rect additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? ❑ h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? 7 i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? ❑ 4. PUNT LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversi`y of species or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? ❑ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? ❑ c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment Of existing species? ❑ d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? ❑ ❑ )Ob ff ❑ ❑ X16 ❑ Kh ❑ X)6 ❑ X)b ❑ X ❑ X.b ❑ EM ❑ XK ❑ XK ❑ XK ❑ W 7 of 6 pages J vcs wwr�c wo 5. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, Or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish., benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? ❑ ❑ NX b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare r or endangered species of animals? ❑ ❑ NX C. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? ❑ ❑ NX d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? ❑ ❑ Xa 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise Ievels? ❑ XM ❑ M' b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ❑ ❑ 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce new light or c'e XM ❑ ❑ 8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? XM ❑ ❑ 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natura. resources? ❑ ❑ X b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? ❑ ❑ XW 10. RISK OF UPSET. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous sub- stances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, Chem.' s or radiation) in the event of an accident or ;,-set conditions? ❑ ❑ XM :1. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? A ❑ ❑ 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? ❑ X ❑ 3 of 6 pages Ell l Ki NAYiE NO 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement. ° ° b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand 'or new parking? C. Substantial impact upon existing transportation bx ❑ o systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people andlor goods? ❑ ❑ M e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? ❑ ❑ XX f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? ❑ CC( ° 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result it a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? ° ° XX b. Police protection? ° ° XPI C. Schools? ❑ ❑ A d. Parks or other recreational facilities? ❑ ❑ XX e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ° ° XX f. Other governmental ser'lices7 ❑ ❑ XX 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: i a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? ❑ ❑ ip b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? ° ° lE UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or babstantial alterations to the following utilities: ❑ ° ?�[ a. Power or natural gas? ° ° A b. Communications systems? ° ° )VI C. Water? ° ° A d. Sewer or septic tanks? ° ° A e. Storm water drainage? ❑ ° A f. Solid waste and disposal? ❑ ° A 4 of 6 pages YES YAYBE MO 17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the pror,sal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding r-ntal health)? ❑ ❑ M b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? ❑ ❑ XDi 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of a;iy scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal rc.;ult in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? ❑ XX ❑ 19. RECREATION. will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? ❑ ❑ XX 20. ARCHEOLOGICALIHISTORICAL. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, obiect or building? ❑ XX ❑ Y 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or i restrict the range of a rare o= endangered plar,t or animal cr eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? ❑ ❑ XW b. Dues the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one wh1oh occurs in a rela- civ�ly brief: definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) ❑ ❑ � C. Does the project have impacts which are indiv- idually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impart on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) ❑ ❑ X9l d. Does the project have er.v.ironmentai effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, ether directly or indirectly? ❑ ❑ X9I 5 of 6 pages CITY OF CAMPBELL 2105 S BASCOM S 84-11 4 of 4 FILE #1 III. DISCUSSION OF ENVIIIONWNTAL EVALWTION r1b. Project includes new buildings, including a parking structure. 3b. Increased surface runoff will occur as the property is developed with impervious surfaces. The impact on storm drainage should be assessed. 7. The project will create new light and possibly glare from both the P office building and parking stru-:ture. 8, 11 $ 12.A portion of the propose" development is indicated as "High Density Residential" on the Land Use Element of the General Plan. 13a,b,c$f. The development of 140,000+ square feet of office space will have an effect on traffic circulation, as checked. 18. The project will be visible to a residential section of the com- munity. 20. The 3xisting strurture is listed on the inventory of possible historic places in Campbell. L TV. OE7UN I NAT ION AFTER REVIEWING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IN^ORMATION SUBMITTED 91 THE APPLICANT. AND AFTER COMPLETING THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST USE EY THE CITY OF CAMPWCLL IN MAKING AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT O I find the proposed pro iect COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will De prepared. o I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, therA will not be a significant effect in this case because the mi-:i- gation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. XX I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. uTe April 17, 1984 TITLE Princi al Planner FOR City of Campbell 1L __ 6 of 6 pages -1 I • `-Sinta "law (2wanty, A DIVISION OF FOUNDRIES T'TIP GROUP ' MAIN r FFICE Al.—AlNORTH VALLEv LDS ALTOS 'A CRPARKt FINANCIAL CENTER 1S]5., Ion A—— 11 TR Redm Aran x 150 N C,pitol yet % San Antonio ROAD KK MpprpaM Aranu. 000 W,et Santa Clara Slrset P.O BOF 55., San I.A. CA %:50 San I.., CA %1X1 S,n Jo,e, CA %1]0 Los Altos. CA iK21 San Jule. CA %117 S1•1t. Kxq IKS) 31. Kidd IKA19ETt,s, IKR1272 1K0 0151 wi 5]00 IKB12A40001 San Joss. CA 95113 MORGAN HILL PALO ALTO SARATOGA SUR YVALE AIRPORT LOCATION I —I N231. telAA W. Ily Rd, SK. 206 0%SMIPIan Arenas. Sail. 2 'ZXM 111,.1 D,r Ali W El Cam —1 SL.I. 21. 22A W W..N Road. suite rod Pill. Mwe,n Hill. CA MIT o. CA 91008 SH,AIdd CA M70 Janny„I,CA 5,057 San Jose. CA %110 1-1 7re-21. 1-1 JI1.M10 IK51 B51 IeW 1-17Xr9BK 1,0612SBeB50 ESCgoW SERVICE IS BEING PROVIDED AS INDICATED BELOW: 3-3G-84 SJV5-113 LMADEN - NORTH VALLEY " LOS ALTOS - MOORPARK _ i AIRPORT -LOCATION Cl FINANCIAL CENTER MORGAN HILL PALO ALTO I SAN JOSE ' - SARATOGA SUNNYVALE Issued for the sole use of: Baker Trailer Sales and Rentals Inc. ORDER NO 154361—DP 2105 S. Bascom Avenue Campbe 11, Ca. ESCRow "° Alre,fio, Leo M. & Doug P. RE Baker Trailer Sales Property Dddr... : 2105 S. Bascom Avenue, Campbell and Rental .no., Dated as of March 2. 19 84 at 7:30 A.M. by /��-/S Chief Title Officer In response to the above referenced application for a policy of title insurance, CALLFORNIA LAND TITLE COMPANY of Santa Clara County hereby reports that it is prepared to issue. or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a Policy or Policies of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss wnich may be sustained by reason of any defect. lien or enculabrance not shown or referred to as an Exception below or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations of said policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage of said Policy or Policies are set forth in Schedule I and Schedule I (continued) attached. Copies of the Policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. 4 it is desired that lia- bility be assumed prior to the issuance .' a policy of iitle insurance,a Binder or Commitment should be requested. The form of policy of title Insurance contemplated by this report is: AN AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY - 1970 WITH ALTA ENDORSEMENT FORM 1 COVERAGE (AMENDED 10-17-70), LOAN POLICY The estate or Interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this Report is: a fee Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof Is vested In: James G.N. Baker and Bettye C. Baker, also known as Bettye Cornelous Baker, his wife, as joint tenants it L— i ORDER NO. 154361 The land referred to in this Report is situated in the Slate of California, County of Santa Clara city of rilloph. t t land is described as follows:) PORTION OF LOT 12, as shover. cn that certain Map entitled, "Map of the Subdivision of the Estate of A. Johnson", which Map was filed for record in the office of the Recorder of the County of Santa Clara, State of California on March 26, 1881 in Book A of Maps, at page(s) 37 and more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a point in the center line of South Bascom Avenue, formerly San Jose -Los Gatos Road, distant thereon South 543.51 feet from the point of intersection thereof With the center line of Campbell Avenue; thence Westerly and parallel with the said center line of Campbell Avenue 47.00 feet to s point in the existing Westerly line of South Bascom Avenue and the true point of beginning of the Parcel of land to be described, said true point of beginning also being the point of intersection of the Westerly line of South Bascom Avenue, with the Northerly line of that certin 0.64 acre parcel of land described in the Deed to James G. M. Baker, et ux, recorded March 5, 1965 in Book 6872 Official Records, page 230, Santa Clara County Records; thence from said true point of beginning Westerly and parallel with the said center line of Campbell Avenue 375.40 feet to the Northwesterly corner of said 0.64 acre parcel; thence Southerly and parallel with the Westerly line of said South Bascom Avenue 66.33 feet; thence South 89° 59' West 292.97 feet to a point in the Easterly line of Michael Drive (60.00 feet in width); thence Southerly along said Easterly line of Michael Drive 238.59 feet to the Southwesterly corner of that certain parcel of land described as parcel no. 2 in the collateral Deed to United 1: me Bank and Trust Co., Mason City, Iowa, Recorded September 8, 19671n Book 7849 Official Records, page 512, Santa Clara County Records; thence along the Southerly line and its Easterly prolongation North 89e 59' East 668.44 feet to the point of intersection thereof with the said Westerly line of South Bascom Avenue, thence Northerly along said Westerly line of South Bascom Avenue �04.92 feet to the true point of beginning 413-44-072 10042 TD/VA/mr A413-44-72,73,83 3-27-78 2 �*a rose le[v rnaJl f At the date hereof exceptions to coverage in addition to the Exceptions and Exclusions in said policy form would be as follows: p) Currently Assessed Taxes for the fiscal year 1984-19 5 a lien, but not yet due or payable. b) Taxes for the fiscal year 1983.84. Bill No. 413-44-072 Code Area 10042 (Affects a portion) First Installment $2,056.40 nas been paid Second Installment l2,056.40 a lien due and payable The above installments include a property tax exemption of none Taxes for the fiscal year 1983-84. Bill No. 413-44-073 Code Area 10042 (Affects a Portion) First Installment $383.09 M has been paid Second Installment $383.09 a lien due and payable The above installments include a property tax exemption of none Taxes for the fiscal year 1983-84• Bill No. 413-44-083 Code Area 10042 (Affects a Portion) First Installment $439.80 has been paid Second Installment $439.80 a lien due and payable The above installments include a property tax exemption of none C) Assessment No.20 for public improvements in City of Campbell under LID N18 County Code No. BOL Balance of interest $20.69 Amount to pay Principal $304.26 Balance of In full until June 30, 1984 is $324.95 excluding $304.26 Princlp!+1 and $41.38 Interest to be collected with the County taxes for the fiscal year 1983-84 (413-44-072) (Affects a Portion) D) Assessment No.19 for public improvements in City of Campbell under LID #18 County Code No. BOL Balance of Principal $161.27 Balance of Interest $10.97 Amount to pay $161.27 In full until June 30, 1984 is $172.24 excluding be with the Principal and $21.94 Interest to collected 1983-84 County taxes for the fiscal year (413-44-073) (Affects a Portion) 3 r-o male-, Mcv n,mi OBDER NU. 1543b1 E) Assessment No.21 for public improvements In City of Campbell under LID #18 County Code No. 80L Balance of Principal $121.76 Balance of Interest $8.28 Amount to pay in full until June 30, 1984 is $130.04 excluding $121.76 Principal and $1.6.56 Interest to be collected with the County taxes for the fiscal year 1983-84 (413-44-083) !A°fects a portion) 1. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assesse9 pursuant to the Statutes of 1983 of the State of California. 2. Any amounts which may be added to the property tax amounts for fiscal year 1978-79 or subsequent years by reason of a reappraisal of any improvements added to, or change of ownership of the hereindescribed premises subsequent to March 1, 1975. 3. An agreement by and between James Baker and The City of Campbell, a municipal corporation, relative to, among other things, construction of street and other improvements, dated June 14, 1965 and recorded June 15, i965 in Book 7031 of Official Records, page 292 4. An easement For underground conduits, pipes, etc. above ground marker posts, risers, etc In favor of Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California corporation Recorded March 23, 1970 In Book 8866 of Official Records, page 635 Affects as follows: The parcel of land conveyed by C.F. Koplin and wife to James G.M. Baker and wife by Deed dated August 18, 1959 and recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of said County of Santa Clara In Book 4519 of Official Records, at page 698; excepting theref:-om that portion conveyed by James G.M. Baker and wife to the City of Campbell by Deed dated April 26, 1965 and recorded in the Office of said County Recorder .n Book 8057 of Official Records, at page 608 Said underground facilities shall be installed within the strip of land described as follows: A strip of land of the uniform width of 10 feet lying contigous to and Northerly of the Southerly boundary line of said real property and extending from the Westerly boundary line of said parcel of land described in said Deed dated April 26, 965 Westerly 10.0 feet 3 5. A Deed of Trust to secure an indebtedness of the amount stated herein and any ocher amounts payable under the terms thereof Dated March 27, 1978 Recorded April 21, 1978 in Book D611 of Official Records, page 341 Trustor James G.M. Baker and Bettye C. Baker, aka Bettye Cornelius Baker, his wife as Joint tenants Trustee American Securities Company, a corporation Beneficiary Wells Fargo P.ank, N.A., a national banking association Amount t200,000.00 The return mailing Rddress of the beneficiary as shown on the above Deed of Trust is: P.C— Box 970, San Jose, Ca. The loan number is not shown An assignment of leasses, given as additional security for the payment of the indebtedness secured by the above Deed of Trust, which assignment was, Recorded April 21, 1978 in Book D611 of Official Records, page 435 Executed By James G.M. Baker and Bettye C. Baker, also known as Bettye Cornelous Baker To Wells Fargo Bank, Natioanl Association 6. An unrecorded Lease, affecting the premises herein stated, ex::cuted by and between the parties named herein, for the term and upon the terms, convenants and conditions therein provided, as disclosed by that assignment of leases Dated March 27, 1978 Recorded April 21, 1978 in Book D611 of Official Records, page 345 Executed by James G.M. Baker and Bettye C. Baker To Baker Trailer Sales and Rentals 7. THE EFFECT OF DOCUMENTS, PROCEEDINGS, LIENS, DECREES OR OTHER MATTERS WHICH DO NOT SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBE SAID LAND, BUT WHICH, IQ ANY DO EXIST, MAY AFFECT THE TITLE OR IMPOSE LIENS OR ENCUMBRANCES THEREON. THE NAME SEARCH OF THE VESTEES HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED AND WILL REQU-RE A STATEMENT OF INFORMATION IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THIS REPORT. 9 G ORDER NO. 154361 NOTE 1: The last recorded instrument(s) conveying record title to the premises Is/are: Deed executer! by C.F. Koplin, et ax, Grantor(s) to James G. M. Baker and Bettye Cornelius Baker, husbadn and wife as Joint tenants Grantee(s), recorded on August 28, 1959 In Rook 4519 of Official Records, at page 698 Deed executed by Kathrin P. Cottle, et vir, Grantor(s) to James G.M. Baker and Bettye C. Baker, his wife, as joint tenants Grantee(s), recorded on June 10, 1963 in Book 6056 of Official Records, at page 3 . Deed executed by Mary F. Pritchard, Grantor(s) to James G.M. Baker and Bettye C. Baker, also known as Betty Cornelius Baker, his wife, as joint tenants Grantee(s), recorded on August 9, 1963 in Book 6142 of Official Records, at page 204 Deed executed by Harry Olson, et ux, Grantor(s) to James G.M. Baker and Bettye C. Baker, his wife as joint tenants Grantee(s), recorded on March 5, 1965 in Book 6872 of Official Records, at page 230 The last conveyances affecting said land recorded within the last six months, prior to the date of this Report are:none NOTE 2: The obtaining of a Statement of Information from the v�,reps herein. NOTE 3: Anj conveyance of the hereindescribed premises by Grant Deed will require the payment of the $10.00 Survey Monument Preservation Fund fee pursuant to Government Code Section 27584 and Ordinance No. NS-300.273. 6 P SCHEDULEI CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION :iTANDARD COVERAGE POLICY — 1973 SCHEDULE B This policy does not insure against loss or damage, nor against costs, attorneys' fees or expenses, any or all of which arise by reason of the following: Part 1 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing (lens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a pubic agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascer- tained by an inspection of the land or by mak!ng inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, (lens or encumbrances, or claim3 thereof, which are not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroach ,ants, or any other facts which a correct survey would sclose, and which are not shown by the public -sco,ds. S. (a) Unpatented mining claims: (b) reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof, (r) water rights, claims or title to water. 8. Any right, title, interest, estate or easement in land beyond the lines of the area specifically described or referred to in Schedule A, or in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways or waterways, but nothing in this paragraph she'[ modify or limit the extent to which the ordina 1 right of an abutting owner for access to a physically open street or highway is insured by this policy. 7. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (includ- ing bui not limited to building and zoning ordinances) restricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land, or regulating the character, dimensions or location of any Improvement now or here- after erected on the land, or prohibiting a separation in ownership or a reduction in the dimensions or area of the land, or the effect of any violation of any such law, ordi. nance or governmental regulation. B. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears in the public records. 9. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not shown by the public records and not otherwise excluded from coverage but known to the insured claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date such claimant acquired an estate or interest Insured by this policy or acquired the insured mortgage and not disclosed in writing by the insured claimant to the Company prior to the date such insured claimant became an incu ed here. under; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy: or (a) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained If the insured claimant had been a pun chaser or encumbrancer for value without knowledge. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY-1979 EXCLUSIONS In addition to the exceptions in Schedule B, you are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. This Includes building and zoning ordinances and also laws and regulations concerning: land use improvements on the land land division environmental protection This exclusion does not limit the zoning coverage described ;n Items 12 and 13 of Covered Tills Risks. 2. The right to take the land by condemning it, unless a notice of taking appears in the public records on the Policy Date, 3. Title Risks: that are created, allowed, or agreed to by you that are known to you, but not to us, on the Policy Date — unless they appeared In the public records. that result in no loss to you that first affect your title after the Policy Date — this does not limit the labor and material lien coverage in I•em 8 of Covered Title Risks 4. Feliurs to pay value to, your title. 5. Lack of a right: to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A or In streets, alleys, or waterways that touch your lend. This exclusion does not limit the access coverage In Item 5 of Covered Title Risks. x G 10'lPL 1— 111W, I SCHEDULE I (Continued) AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY-1970 WITH A.L.T.A. ENDORSEMENT FORM 1 COVERAGE (AMENDED 10.17.70) SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy: 1. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not ll:nited ., building and zoning ordi. nances) restricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use cr emuym,nt of the land, or regulating the character, d'mmensions or location of any improvement now of hereafter erected on the land, or prohibit. ing a separation In ownership or a reduction in the dimensions or area c i the land, or the effect of any viola. tion of any such law, ordinance or governmental regulation. 2. Rights of eminent dcmain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears in the public records at Date of Policy. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company and not shown by the public records but known to the insured claimant either at Date of Policy or at the oalu ..uch claimant acquired an estate or interest Insured by this policy or acquired the insured mortgage and not disclosed in writing by the Insured claim- ant to the Company prior to the date such insured claimant became an Insured hereunder; (e) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent insurance is afforded 'herein as to any statutory lien for labor or material or to the extent Insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for street Improvements under construction or completed at Date of Policy). 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of failure � .he cured at Date of Policy or of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness to comply with applicable "doing business" laws of the state in which the land is situated. AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY FORM B-1970 (AMENDED 10.17.70) SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE 1. Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not ,,,,. led to building and zoning ordi. nances) restricting or regulating or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land, or regulating the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land, or prohibit- ing a separation in ownership or a reduction In the dimensions of area of the land, or the effect of any violation of any such law, ordinance or governmental regulation. 2. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appear in the public records at Date of Policy. 3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company and nut shown by the public records but known to the insured claimant either at Date of Policy or at the date sL-ch claiman! acquired an estate or interest by this policy and not disclosed In writing by the Insured claimant to the Company prior to the date such insured claimant Sesame an insured hereunder; (c) resulting In no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; (a) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the Insured claimant had paid value for the estate or Interest insured by this policy, rT0 IOx1U IREV )nll31 � _J iNI -iJ L x�a war F4 V; ME NR 1 J if GE t� C O 9�i7 .6Yzd J S • 1 �'• 4t � 0 I 1 " o-.i x : � E oa o"- 3nv (-, e•'M::u:)• •wo�sre=•nr.nas--- il/ n✓rrrs a' r s aoni w i � 4444ul 41 20 4/ !e ., ant O�rV'di:Y'J J ` a • x�•. I .�_ _... i~ � �s 3 �, 1 1 •�I � ial. ��•; � I p I ovscr sor'. w w s 4 Y m YI r II O I � M a I �NOINn. 111 MYfW10r'Y i 101 iR I I i REGORDIRG RfDDEarfD ar I Wwfeat COxDFO Melt rO i r 1 L',ts, � eP',• '�. rOP PFCOPDLN S U.11 _ _ ____15PaCt _ j POWER OF ATTORNEY SPECIAL KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That 1, BETTYE C. BAKER the undersigned (jointly and severally it more than one, hereinafter collectively "principal"), hereby make, constitute and appoint ROLLAND E. GREFE _ principal's true and lawful attorney to act for principal and In principal's name, plate and stead and tot principal's use and benefit: (a) To do any and all acts necessary to consummate the sale of the real property located in the County of Santa Clara, State of California, described in Exhibit "A" attarhed hereto and in- corporated herein, including but not limited to negotiating and approving terms and con dtions of sale, preparing and signing escrow documents and amendments thereto, signing deeds or any other documents necessary to clear title and/or complete said sale. He is also authorized to direct the dis tri bu[ion .of funds from the sale of said property to his trust account for my benefit. He is also authorized to prepare and to execute any California death tax returns in regard to the death of my husband, JAMES G. M. BAKER, and to obtain any releases of tax liens on the subject property and execute an Afftdavit - Death of Joint Tenant for the subject property. Principal heleoy grants to said attorney in fact full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing which may be necessary, or convenient, in connection with any of the foregpoing, as fully, to all mfents and purposes, as pnncioal might or could do it pe:aonally present, hereby ratifying and confirming all that our said attorney in tact shall lawfully do or cause to be done by authority hereof. Wherever the context so requires, the singular number includes the plural. WITNESS my hand this:_-dayot February __ '_ r _ 1986_ STALE Of CatIFO9NIA touNTy of GRANGE MIME 22�e air IT b.ruary MrM rN: l9fli.A Im.,IM uMeislpMa.. MauY PNx In wd far ud Sm., pneer.11,.pptar.e BETTYE C. BAKER _ pewu`ryNM-nIII mIII, PIMto lM an the W",.1 Htisfaclo7 evi0enc.) to he me person_ RMw IWM. is _Sdsow w IM •aNln Inelrum.M, aM atAnOmlwpM ID me IMl $_M_ .e.[dw N WITNESS my Wnd EM .flkul 00. OTFICI qL SEgL rINN: T405010r,iJN J/// Naar Pot" In aM for Ead Sul.. N,� 'ePR' " 332, f9!, The real property in the City of Campl.ell, Coucty oi. Santa Clara, State of Calif... I.destn bed as:, samaa a rv.nf°u a.:l, ^1. }�• . } !..< S n .l<69 l.: ,9'rG.al.,Dl..::. a IT 1`:.r I•. , '!T :<r. ar::a f.uanel9• ... 9.... ....... �....:._.D. n;ii:i»i"`e ;•.' ,:;n': ;T�nx : .. •�3:::�6Gn i..:.:Is::a:M,•a,:°:::°or°So••v`:.i-:i:;�°a ::l"ii; v:i :s;�;n:.f . ,i;..p a, n 3,..•ii:oD°i::::: a . ,.a^.r . .............. If6lia6.1 Ofl,.l.l AD .• ..a. L 1 l rtt TNTS •Y.�'.r a:. sup a.,.n".l an ..f 1. l.M..n .n, <a EXHIBIT "A" __ _ _ ... . _ .... .. .. _-.. -. .. a NL -. ....•n.......a,.....,..�.,... _._ I ■rA ■♦ rota rm 2 •.. • ...-CoUWn Ci r..w•.•_N_._- a L