Loading...
S 86-03CITY OF CAMPBELL 1875 S BASCOM S 86-03 1 Qf 2 • G • (E) PARKING P 314' 14' f' TVP. G XI'A�j I? Pgy�,i61.E- � j f (E) PARKING RASE? igTa2. { 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 a ! 10 11 • H. C. UNIT I DRIVEWAY P T COCHERE CORRIDOR OFFICE T. OFFICE $TOR 12 13 14 STOR MAIDS vENpMts (E) PARKING y` ,, EGISTR t roR,—�- STORAGE CONFERENCE s, 15 I SLORY ii • - _ . _ ; s!~T4R R`r�ilull 19 Loe�Y 1 o I 32 ,atr 3 -- -- - c 20 3 I i icci -- - LOCKERS N I � STAIRu 17 LOCKERS - -� 21 COURTYARD o VENDWO CORRIDOR Stipds p1r€If • - ? ?---T 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 14 i ^, 22 { 42 -7 -1 jll� 0 - � N GRODIN'S PLAZA EL BURRO THE GA i d8 • - ( OVER LIVINGSTON'S I LADY IN E'. LUCERO FOXMOOR BONSALL'S i ( PATIO) GRAN PLAZA �' Fko V � �� L nr y y (.gyp �. �i.u'►�t �i T') YIU+� — • j���' - - N • \ 4 - NEW SHOPS (E) SHOPS 0, SCALE : 1/16' • t' - O' NOTES : ��6-05 F E B 11986 uj CITY OF CAMPBELL PUNNING DEPARTMENT REVISIONS �a...cS� ..nli 8 CJcrCt^a CONSULTANT THE PRUNEYARD INN THE PRUNEYARD - CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA HEDLEY AND STARK , INC. ASSOCIATED ARCHITECTS 346 EAST CAMPBELL AVENUE DATE 2.14 N DRAWN CHECKED SCHEMATIC . GROUND FLOOR PLAN SHEET NUMBER 1 CALIFORNIA 95008 TELEPHONE 37 9-7404 JOB NO. il ss-712 OF 3 T-T I 11 2 3 41 5 I 61 I 11 21 31 41 TS 8 7 8 T 10 tt 12 t3 t�l �151 D. T. I N. �! _ ........ r - - - :. __�- - � ._� �-- - �-„,•. t-.- - - - ..-. �.. �. — -- --- - -- - - - ter...: TrI Tr I-0pr., LJ�i t 11 �—.yo: orec ocun:nc� COURTYARD ELEVATION oven SECTION EAST ELEVATIONT��v�� �fc�olw� nc�iGY NOTES : MATERIALS JGeS O JG .SOa'1,S•'7 C�for ,c�gr,-S o r r/um G Tocuer : o :x br�c=k v-encar: •tifos' -TT t2b DG p, oo: c red scc -: - dare bro �9 loosea �br.t Gochere coeer - co.orcc ocun%q roor•G ,00071$- FEB 1 -1986 0 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVISIONS CONSULTANT HEDLEY AND STARK , INC. DATE a6 PRELIMI'NARY THE PRUNEYARD INN ASSOCIATED ARCHITECTS 2. DRAWN 346 EAST CAMPBELL AVENUE CHECKED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA CAMPBELL CALIFORNIA[ME 95008 TELEPHONE 379-7404 JOB NO. � 66-712 SCALE 3/32' • 1' - 0' j 1I IT 21 I I T23!41R--79i0� �51r1213J 156538 SHEET NUMBER 3 OF 3 I 11 1� 2) I 31 4 5 I 61 8' l 11 21 31 4 5. 6 7 91 9 10 tt 12 1377147711 PLANNING COMMISSION W RCH 25, 1986 S 86-03 Application of Mr. Fred Sahadi for S ahadi, F. approval of plans and elevations to allow the construction of a 79-room inn in the northerly portion of an existing shopping center (The Pruneyardi on property known as 1875 S. Bascom Ave. 1n a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Perrine reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is of the opinion that this is a bold concepe. The only concern expressed reg-rds traffic circulation in the area; howev,r, assuming these problems can be worked out, the Site Committee is recommending approval. Commissioner Dickson questioned the comments from the Building and Fire Departments. Mr. Kee indicated that, after talking with these departments, it has been determined that changes can be made to satisfy the building and fire codes. These changes would have to wade prior to issuance of any building permits. Mr. Helms noted that Public Works is not recommending any requirements as a condition of approval. Commissioner Perrin addressed the concerns listed in the Staff Report, noting that the inn's lobby would be designed to allow pedestrian flow from the shopping center areas; improved vehicular patterns would be provided by breaking up some of the existing islands; the inn will operate under the same management as the Campbell Inn, thereby sharing it's exposure. Commissioner Olszewski noted that his recommendation on the Site Committee had been non -committal due to the traffic circulation problems around the Pruneyard, particularly on Bascom and Campbell Avenues. Mr. Helms discussed existing traffic patterns; and, regarding the application before the Commission at this time, Staff has taken the _.. position that prior approvals have authorized construction within the subject floor space, with the allowed use being more traffic intense that the proposed hotel; 111!refore, it would not be appropriate to require further mitigation ,,e.sures as a result of this particular development. Commissioner Dickson asked about the maintaining of setbacks in a mixed -use development, Mr. Kee indicated that Staff views the hotel as a commercial type of use. Commissioner Christ asked if the proposal included designated parking for hotel guests, noting that he would not like to see this. Mr. Kee responded that there might need to be designated loading/unloading spaces; however, Staff would not be in favor of hotelonly designated parking. �n Mr. Morris Stark, architect, app,ared to answer any Questions the 'll SIbv Commission might have. �,• Mr. Fred Sahadl, applicant, addressed questions regarding market studies; overall Pruneyard development, ambiance, and obsolesence; area competition; existing parking layouts at the center; possible proposals for designated hotel parking; impacts of development adjacent to Campbell boundaries; signalizatlon and traffic circulation on Bascom and Campbell Avenues; and, vehicle trips. M/S: Perrino, Dickson - That the Planning Commission adopt the findings attecl.ed hereto, and approve S 86-03, subject to conditions indicated in the Staff Report (attached hereto). i M/S: Fairbanks, Olszewski - That the motion for approval be amended to include a condition that the parking plan come back to the Commission for review if designated parking for the inn is proposed. Amendment accepted by Commissioners Dickson and Perrine. Motion for approval, with amendment, carried unanimously (7-0-0). Commissioner Olszewski commented that it is entirely untrue that the proposed use would cause less of a traffic problem in rhat there already exists a problem without the subject area being used. However, Mr. Sahadi answered his concern by stating that there are some things in the works to correct the problem on Campbell/Union Avenues. I J ORD RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FILE NO: S -0 APPLICANT: SAHADI. F. SITE ADDRESS: 1875 S. BASCOM AVE. t780-790 THE PRUNEYARD P.C. MTG.; 3/25/86 1. The proposed motel use is permitted in the C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. 1. The building design, with modifications as recommended by the Architectural Advisor, is similar to the remainder of the Pruneyard Shopping Centh -. 3. The proposed motel u­ —quires the provision of 88 parking spaces versus the previously approved r.rail use which required the provision of 115 parking spaces. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: S 86-03 APPL IC MIT: SA!IADI, F. SITE ADDRESS: 1875 S. BASCOM AVE i 780-790 THE PRUNEYARD P.C. MTG. 3/25/86 The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the !aws of the State of Ca.ifornic. 1. Reviscd elevations and/or site plan addressing items in Staff Report to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or the Planning Commission prior to application for a building permit. 2. Property to be fenced and landscaped ae indic aed and/or added in red on the pl—s. Landscaping and fencing shall be m..intained in accordance with the approved plans. 3. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material. and location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning Departoer,c and pproved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/3r Planni.n�, Comnission prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $3,000.00 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 mon-3 of completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to piece landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to application for a building permit. 5. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department, prior to installation of POSE utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if boxe; are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director. 6. All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to he jcreened as approved by the Planning Director. 7. Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are installed. 8. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curhs or bumper guards. 9. Underground utilities to be provided as required by S+ctlon 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. 10. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. X II, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: S 86-03 APPLICANT: SAHADI, F. SITE ADDRESS: 1875 S. BASCOM AVE / 780-790 THE PRUNEYARD PACE 2. Il. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by Planning and Building Departments (Section 21.68.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code). 12. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, gerhage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, end construction establishments. 13. Trash contairer,$) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the aevelopment shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self -closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All encicsures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 14. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City req.:irements for the hand capped. 15. Noise levels for the interior of residential units shail comply with minimum State (Title 25) and local standards as indicated in the Noise Element of the Campbell General Plan. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 16. Parking plan to come back to Planning Commission for review if designated parking for inn is proposed. FIRE DEPARTMENT 17. R-1 (Hotel/Motel) occupancies are not allowed to be added to the Pruneyard under UBC Section 506(b) which describes unlimited area buildings. BUILDING DEPARTMENT Comments: The Prunevard was built as a B-2 V-No-Hour building with sprinklers and 60 tL. sidevards to comply with the unlimited provisions of Section i06. The exception under 503(a) of the Uniform Building Code has been utilizea by all of the restaurants in the Pruneyard, which covers the 10% rule. I fiid no provisions in the building ^ode to pe-mit the construction of this motel :n the Pruneyard as it is presently builr. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT No comment. W 1 Q C014DITIONS OF APPROVAL: S 86-03 APPLICANT: SAHADI, F. SITE ADDRESS: 1875 S. BASCOM AVE B 780-790 TUE PRUNEYARD P.C. MTG. 3/25/86 The applicant is notified zs part of this application that he/shf• is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. 1. Revised elevations and/or site plan addressing items in Staff Report to be submitted to the Planning 7epartment and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or the Planning Commission prior to application for a building permit. 2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping, and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 3. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Corunittee and/or Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. 4• Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $3,000.00 to insure landscaping, fencing„ and striping of parking areas within S months of completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking area;. Bond or agreement to he filed with the Planning Department prior to application for a building permit. 5. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if boxes are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director. 6. All mechanical enuipment on roofs and all utility meters to he screened as approved by the Planning Director. 7. Building occupancy will not he allowed until public installed. e improvements ar S. All par1,iuv, and driveway areas to be developed is compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. 9. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. 10. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. CO!'.DITIONS OF APPROVAL: S 96-03 APPLICANT: SAIIADI, F. SITE ADDRESS: 1815 S. BASCOM :.V`i 0 780-790 TtU: PRU`RiYARD PAGE. 2. 11. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the yi{n Ordinance for all sions. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by Planning and Building Departments (Section 21.63.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code). 12. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refose, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, inuustrlal, manufacturin,�, and construction establishments. 13. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self -closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 14. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. 15. Noise levels for the interior of residential units shall comply with minimum State (Title 25) and local standards as indicated in the Noise Element of the Campbell General Plan. PLANING DEPARTMENT 16. Parking plan to come back to Planting Commission for review if designated parking for inn is proposed. FIR`: DEPARTt1Et]T 17. R-1 (hotel/Motel) occupancies are not allowed to be added to the Pruneyard under UBC Section 506(b) which describes unlimited area buildings. BUILDING DEPAP.TMENT Comments: The Pruneyard was built as a 8-2 V-No-hour building with sprinklers and 60 ft. sideyards to comply with the unlimited provisions of Section 506. The exception under 503(a) of the Uniform Building Code has been utilized by all of the restaurants in the Pruneyard, which covers the 10% rule. I find no provisions in the building code to permit the construction of this notel in the Pruneyard as it is presently built. PUBLIC WORKS DF.PARTWfr:TT No comment. 0 ITEM NO. 2 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 25. 1986 S 86-03 Application of Mr. Fred Sahadi for Sahadi. ", approval of plans and elevations to allow the construction of a 79-room inn in the northerly porti^n of an existing shopping center (The Pruneyard) o1, property known as 1875 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. STAFF RECOfefE:7DATION That the Plannin¢ Commission adopt the attached findings and approve the applicant's proposal, subject to the attached findings. STAFF DISr,OSSION The applicant is requesting, approval of plans and elevations to allow the construction of a 79-room inn on the northerly portion of the existing Pruneyard Shopping Center. The prop—ed inn would be accommodated in a two-story structure located in a portion of the Pruneyard previously approved for a sin;le story of retail use. This portion of the Pruneyard is currently occupied by some existing retail shops and a partially completed space with only a roof structure. This existing, portion of the shopping center occupies approximately 23.00 sq.ft., or approximately 97 of the total shopping center square footage. The applicant's proposal indicates the construction of a two-story spanish style structure which would accommodate a 79-room inn with related lobby and service facilities. The proposed structure consists of approximately 46,500 sq.ft. of floor area. Building elevations indicate the use of stucco material for walls and the reuse of existing roof tiles for roofing,. Generally, the elevations reflect the existing, style of the shopping center. The applicant has indicated that existing, parking, facilities woul� be used to provide parking for this use. The previous approval of this portion uf the Pruneyard allowed approximately 23,100 sq.ft, of retail use. Based upon a parking, ratio of 1:200, this area would have required the provision of 115 parking spaces. The proposed motel use would require the provision of 88 parkinq spaces, consequently, the proposed use is less intensive from a parkin? demand standpoint. L • S 86-03 -2- March 25, 1987 Staff would recommend that 3 handicapped parkin-; spaces he provided it conjunction with this proposal, so that sufficient handicapped narking is provided in light of the current parkin; standards. The submitted plans indicate the retention of planting areas adjacent to the project entry and in the courtyard areas to the north of this project. The plans, however, do not indicate the retention of climbing ivy ,.ong the perimeter walkway nor the provision of a planting buffer between the parkin] area and the building,. Staff recommends that these landscaping, elements he maintained to provide a consistency with the remainder of the Pruneyard. The Plannin; Department has received comments from the Building and Fire Departments that the proposed motel cannot be constructed as presented. The Building Official, however, has indicated that with Elie provision of additional fire walls, this project may be possible. The Architectural Advisor comments that this project proposes an interesting combination of uses at this shopping center which should work well together. lie does, however, express the following concerns: 1. 11ow does this project affect pedestrian circulation to other shops in the center? 2. The vehicular circulation patterns at the inn entry appear awkward. 3. The inn is proposed on the interior of the Pruneyard with little or no street exposure, flow will this identity problem be solved? 4. The support poles for the porte cochere do not relate to the building, design. 5. Color/building materinl samples should he provided; and 6. The proposed perimeter walkways should match the existing walkways used throughout the Pruneyard. Staff is recommending that the applicant submit revised plans addressing these concerns which would be approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. 0 C RECOMENDED FINDINGS FILE NO: APPLICARTi SA1IADi, F. SITF ADDRESS: L875 S. BASCOM A!^c. l780-790 THE PRUNEYARD P.C. MTG.; 3/25/86 1. The proposed motel use is permitted in the C-2-S (Genoral Commercial) Zoning District. The building design, with modifications as recommended by the Architectural Advisor, is gintlar to the remainder of the Pruneyard Shopping Center. 3. The proposed motel use requires the provision of 88 parking spaces versus the previously approved retail use which required the provision of 115 parking, spaces. 1 0 C. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: S 56-03 APPLICANT: SAHADI, F. SITE ADDRESS: 1575 S. BASCOM AVE A 7,10-790 TILE PRUNEYARD P.C. JTG. 3/25/36 The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the taws of the State of California. 1. Revised elevations and/or site plan addressing items in S[af2 Report to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and Architectur..i Review Committee and/or the Planning Commission prior to application for a building permit. 2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 3. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to he submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Applicant to either (I) host a faithful perf-rmance bond in the amount of $1,000.00 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months of completion of construction, or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to application for a bu Lid Lig permit. 5. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if Mxes are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director. 6. All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. 7. Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are installed. S. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell 'tnicipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. 9. Underground utilities to he provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. 10. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: S 36-03 APPLICANT: SAHADI, P. SITE: ADDRESS: 1875 S. BASCOM AVE 1780-790 THE PRUN^YARD PAC!: 2. 11. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by Planu.ng, and Building Departments (Section 21.68.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code). 12. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Nunicipai Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be siade with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all sin;le-family dwellings, mult'.ple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction estahllshments. 13. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall he located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self -closing, doors of a size specified by the Fire Deaartnent. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 14. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. 15. Noise levels for the interior of residential units shall comply with ninimum State (Title 25) and local standards as indicated in the Noise Element of the Campbell General Plan. FIRE DEPAnTrrNT 16. R-I Motel/hotel) occupancies are not allowed to be added to the Pruneyard under UBC Section 506(b) which describes unlimited area buildings. RIITI.DTIM nRPART?Ir�rr Comments: The Pruneyard was built as a B-2 V-No-flour building with sprinklers and 60 ft. sideyards to comply with the unlimited provisions of Section 506. The exception under 503(a) of the Uniform Building Code has been utilized by all of the restaurants in the Prunevard, which covers the 10% rule. I find no provisions in the buildint code to permit the construction of this notel in the Prunevard as it is presently built. PUBLIC WORKS DEP.4RTNENT No torment. r �'k -� J I STAFF PROCESS LIST FILE NO. S 86-03 AGENDA DATE: 31125/86 DATE FILED: 2/21/86 FEE: f%377•ns PAID: SITE ADDRESS: 1875 S. Bascom Ave., #780-790 APN NO: 288-4-7, 8, 9 PROPOSED USE: Dbtel - 79 rooms ZONING: C-2-S GENERAL PLAN: Cammercial APPLICANT: Mr. Fred Sahadi ADDRESS: 1901 S. Bascom Ave., 0900 Campbell, C\ 95008 PHONE NO: 371-0811 ••• DATE PUBLISHED IN CAMPBELL PRESS: Neg. Dec. noticed 3/12/86 DATE PROPERTY WAS POSTED (IF APPLICABLE): DATE LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT: DATE OF FIRST (PUBLIC) HEARING: 3/25/86 CONTINUED TO: / APPROVED DATE: RESOLUTION NO: DENIED DATE: RESOLUTION NO: DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY CITY COUNCIL: FINAL ACTION: APPROVED DENIED Copies to: fWley $ Stark Architects 346 F.. Campbell Ave. Campbell, CA 95008 379-7404 NOTICE OF DETERMINATION I TO: Secretary for Resources FROM: Planning Department 1416 Nin h Street, Room 1311 RrEC4 City of Campbell Sacramento, CA 95614 (ENE'� rth Cent-.,! 1 Avenue 11, CA y5008 ?.a Cc ity Clerk's Office Santa Clara County MAR 31 1986 191 North First Street GnACF K.YAMAKA:YA San Jose, CA 95113 SUBJECT: filing of Notice of Determin'b'CTUff— nfompliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. PROJECT TITLE: (S 86-03) STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NUMBER (If Any) CONTACT PERSON __Tim J. Haley —Tel. No. (408) 966-2140 i PROJECT LOCATION 1875 S. Bascom Ave. # 780-790 The Pruneyard I PROJECT DESCRIPTION 79 Room Inr. This is to advise that the CITY OF CAMPBELL has made the following determina.ions regarding the above described project. 1. The project has been i­ approved by the City of Campbell. J disapproved �3 The project will have a significant effect on the environment. w111 not 3. An F.vironmental Inpa:t Report was prepared for this project pu _uant to the provisions of CEQA. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant r to the provisions of CEQA. The EIR or Negative Declaration and record of project approval may be examined at: The Plam,ing Department, City of Campbell, I. w 75 North Central Avenue, Campbell, CA 95008 4. Mitigation measures were made a condition of the ap proval were not — of this project. U 5. A statement of Overriding Considerations _ was adopted for this project. k was not DAiE RECEIVED FOR FILING: 4Z 6 Z,2,c SIGNATURE TITLE�— PITY OF VAMPOEII 70 N O R T H F I R S T S T R E E T CAM POE L L. CALIFORNIA 95006 (408) 866-2100 Department Planning Fred Sahadi 1901 S. Bascom Ave., Ste. 900 Campbell, CA 95008 RE: S 86-03 1875 S. Bascom Ave. Dear Mr. Sahadi March 26, 1986 At its meeting of March 25, 1986, the Planning Commission approved your plans for a 79 room inn, subject to the attached conditions. This approval will be effective April 5, 1986 unless it is appealed. Please note condit'_on 41, which requires submittal of re Wised plans and elevations addressing the con- cerns as indicated in the Staff Comment Sheet of March 25, 1986. If you have any questions regarding this approval, please do not hesitate to contact the Planning `efice. Sincerely, ARTHUR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR MARTY C. WOODW RTH PLANNER II a � z MEMORANDUM _ CITY OF CAMPBELL 7o. KEPIN C. DIICZAN Date MARCIi 6, 1986 CITY MMAGLR From AIMPM A. KEt PLANNING DIRECTOR Subt.ct: 1NPOWATION REGARDING T1M PRIINEYARD INN DI SCLl9S ION The Planning Commission, last night, took action to approve plans and elevations for a 79-unit inn to be located in the Pnauevard. 17he property is zoned C-2-S, which means that the Planning Commission has authority for approval, and that the item would not continue onto the Citv Council. ld PLANNING COMMISSION SITE 6 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE DEPARTMENT COMMENT SHEET _ ARCHITECT DATE: February 24, 1986 _ BUILDING A;ENDA: March 25, 1986 _ FIRE _ POL—E PLEASE RETURN BY: Marcel 11, 1986 _ PUBLIC WORKS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SITE ADDRESS: 1875 S. Bascom Ave. j,780-790 APPLICANT: Mr. Frea Sahadi TELEPHONE: 371-061, ADDRESS: 1901 S Rnconm Awn Sniro onn Campbell, Ca. 95008 PROPOSAL: To consider the application of tlr. Fred Ea'Iadi for S 8E-03 approval of a site and architectural application to allow Sahadi, Fthe construction of a 79 room inn ir. the northerly portion of an existing regional shonnirg center(The Pruneyard)on property known as 1375'S. Bascom Ave. ;780-790 in a C-2-S(Ceneral Corr:ercial Zoninp District. DEPAh7TENTAL RECOMMEN7�AT?ONS: CODE REQUIREMENTS: STAFF CALCIILATION SHEET -ATE: t`I % AGENDA DATE: NAME: ) 2iOtIvi— FILE NO. �t!,— O ADDRESS: tlogtehi pweF. APN: Lb8-4- 7 S 9 PROPOSED USE: 1h-" " j�Hy _ ZONE: GZ-S GROSS LOT AREA: sq.ft. y�• ylt.rr t. NET LOT AREA: _ c��ce` acres sq.ft. �. _ _ acres BUILDING AREA BY USF: 1. oyy 00%r_(I 7.--- 3. _ 4. TOTAL FIRST FLOOR BUILDING A.',EA 27- g 3 1F _sq.ft. COVERAGE: % of net lot area. TOTAL AMOUNT OF PAVING: sq.ft. % of net lot area. LANDSCAPING: CODE: __ sq.ft. _° of r.et lot area. PROVIDED: _ ___Sq.ft. t of net lot area. EXISTING LARGE TREES: __Yes *_No SETBACKS: AS PROVIDED CODE Front E IC, T1-� Left Right Rear SEPARATION BETWEEN BUILDINGS: AS PROVIDED CODE BUILDING HEIGHT: Building Wall( 1 TOTAL HEIGHT 4 �i Yta w� PARKING SPACES: TYPE AS PROVIDED CODE Regular _ r Compact 3 S Handicap Total Covered Uncovered PARKING RATIO: I PROVIDED CODE I Icr 6rv�oY—c PARKING DESIGN: ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE Stall Size Drivfway Width Backup Distance _ Distance from Bldgs. _ Turnaround Area DENSITY (RESIDENTIAL): Total No, of Units Type and No. Each A-,-P VVIDED CODE Units per Gross Acre Units per Zoning n.nla Open Space EXISTING SURoOUNDING LPND USES: / l North: South: vey�0 C>.w East: West The above calculations are intended for Staff review and summaries. These calculations are approximations and should be used as such. eN PLANNING COMMISSION SITE 6 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE DEPARTMINT COMMENT SHEET � " 11 ° tnac D CAMPBELL FIRE DEPARTMENT ARCHITECT DATE: February 24, 1986 _ BUILDING AGENDA: March 25, 1986 FIRE P^LICE PLEASE RETURN BY: March 11, 1986 _ _ PUBLIC. WORKS REDEVELOPMENT AGLNCY SITE ADDRESS: 1375 S. Bascom Ave. j780-790 APPLICANT: Mr. Fred Sanadi TELEPHONE: 371-0611 ADDRESS: 1901 S Rasrn, A_.o °ui ra qP0 Campbell, Ca. 95008 PROPOSAL: To consider the application of Mr. Fred Sahadi for S 8E-03 approval of a site and architectural application to allo7y Sanadi, ;the construction of a 79 room inn ir the nortberiv portion of an existing regional snonning center(The Pruneyard)on property known as 1375 S. Bascom Ave. ;,780-790 in a C-2-S(General Cornercial Zoninp District, DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS:`/:gQ12a,P,,,� a� Lei �•=c CODE (K4¢ I/404ej) I REQUIREMENTS: _�) R-I pc. C=�Pr.,..< < C re- K&t a6 ll(�,..rkcl . t cC cis. �: •4v d Pr ,. ,w....� U fa C-- Sa�i (61 L. cCa<•- t,. - Jwia�.�aiac� area �7>> i PLANNING COMMISSION SITE 6 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE DFPARTMENT COMMENT SHEET _ ARCHITECT DATE: February 24, 1986 BUILDING AGENDA: March 25, 1986 _ FIRE _ POLICE PLEASE RETURN BY: March 11, 1986 _ PUBLIC WORKS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SITE ADDRESS: 1375 S. Bascom Ave. 3780-790 ' APPLICANT: Mr. Fred Sahadi. TELEPHONE: 371-0611 ADDRESS: 1901 S Ra crnn Avc cnira 00n Campbell, Ca. 95008 PROPOSAL: To consider the application of Mr. Fred Eahadi for I S 8f-03 a proval of a site and architectural apnlication to alloy Sahadi, Fthe construction of a 79 room inn in the northerly portion of an existing regional shon-ing center(The Pruneyard)on property known as 1375'S. Bascom Ave. v730-790 in a C-2-S(Ceneral Cornercial Zoning District. DEPARTMENTAL { RECOMMENDATIONS: CODE n JEQUIREMENTS: The Pruneyard was built as i B-_ Type V-No-hour building I 'O m a� with sprinklers"' & 60 ft. sideyards to comply with the a lso aH unlimited provisions of Section 506. a� exception exce under 503 p = The p (a) of the Uniform Building Code 1' W� has been utilized by all of the restaurants In the Pruneyard, which covers the 10% rule. I find no provisions in the building code to Fermit the coustruction of this motel in the Pruneyard as it is presently built. J PLANNING COMMISSION SITE 6 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE DEPARTMENT COMMENT SHEET _ ARCHITECT DATE: February 24, 1986 _ BUILDING AGENDA: March 25, 1986 _ FIRE _ POLICE PLEASE RETURN BY: Marc. 11, 1986 PUBLIC WORKS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SITE ADDRESS: 1375 S Sascom Ave. j.780-790 APPLICANT: Mr. Fred Sahadi TELEPHONE: 371-0&11 ADDRESS: _1901 S g_, A— Shiro Qn(I Campbell, Ca. 95008 PROPOSAL: To consider the application of Mr. Fred Sahadi for S 8(-03 approval of a site and architectural application to alloir Sahadi, rthe construction of a 79 room inn in the northerly portion of an existing regional shonning centerCThe Pruneyard)on property known as 137;'S. Bascom Ave. i,780-790 in a C-2-S(General Cornercial Zoning District. „CPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: CODE REQUIREMENT': ti I� i v i PLANNING COMMISSION SITE 6 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE DEPARTMENT COMMENT SHEET ARCHITECT DATE: February 24, 1986 BUILDING AGENDA: March 25, 1986 _ FIRE POLICE PLEASE RETURN BY: Marcel 11, 1986 PUBLIC WORKS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SITE ADDRESS: 1375 S. Bascom Ave. �780-790 I APPLICANT: •'r. Free Sahadi TELEpRM: 371-0811 ADDRESS: 1901 S Racrn, Ag, cui ra 9n[) Campbell, Ca. 95008 PROPOSAL_ To consider the application of Mr. Fred Sahadi for S 6f-03 approval of a site and architectural anplication to allow Sahadi, F the construction of a 79 room inn ir. the northerly .- portion of an existing regional shonning center(The Pruneyard)on property known as 1375 S. Bascom Ave. 030-790 in a C-t-S(General Cornercial Zoninp District. + DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS: CODE REQUIREMENTS: `oNG6rnJS _ 1) S .ce 1 cb to A S'7t FLAP n ewt RNs-o 'M! Atr- of TM CJIlO VC Avg s,4 Jtj SSTy f-oKvtri- .. �'_ �i"4L^jXa. Ip'?i7Y or 4f �t. �Fl ti!t. ;10jA:.EM 6AIST-14 ii+carS, Z� iNt eti ARC IiOLC A -An r S�AIFy q,rc wt <N��.O s• aEE h++tr^ sn.+ae- 'I.E �w�- Br r.x� �✓Al iM'A sNl, L� -Ih5 (�u6R-/ � /lu.s -Nrt,� F.'r• .KS L'c cn IVY L4nroJu+77yf -- W1 33. 4 34. The existing site consists of 4 or 5 stores whose leases are expired or about to expire plus several roofed but empty modules which have not been leased since the center opened. They are all located on the north side of the Pruneyard between Grodins and Food Villa. The site has been developed for several years as a regional shopping center and office tower complex. This specific project has only one exposure to adjacent property, a two story multi -family residential complex about IN feet to the north at the closest point. The remainder of the commercial complex is a rambling, one and two story, spanish tile roofed development, vaguely early california ranch style. The existing courtyard and plaza .in the south side of the new motel will be largely retained with some re -development and planting. The new building itself is generally two story with a typical roof height of about thirty feet but does contain a central tower about forty five feet in height with a thirty five foot high atrium behind it. The color scheme of the new addition will blend in with the existing complex. The roof tile will be salvaged existing tile where it is exposed to public view on the north and east sides and will he matched as closely as possible on the south or courtyard sides. The cemen, plaster will he a light complementary grayed tan with wood eaves and posts stained a weathered gray brown. Wrought iron "balcony" railings will be matte black. The canvas awnings and tower panels are intended to be note intense, gay colors to signify an old world market place and may range in the yellow -orange -terra Gotta shades. _I MEMORANDUM CITY OF C&AWN" - $,.DIK t �t'9 CCL�-,a.l. INf�P-d-rATl�1 f3'Gl An /.5r 14 C I 'l �Lt/AcCb /R�or "'TALE IS =a"w rr.W QLJL B JT S ucG a-Yr 7t+.1-f I6 �.sYtrn T1 � „ a, T� Ptn rr�c S{ �li"'tC'r11c�e0 G.c6�+ 1ti U. J of TN 4 LJo,v (biTi MAY 6e: fis+ n+vJc.• D�PFEIaWT Ta M41ca rHt WliaLe &-.PC. Co-,c AS jr 17 TRIey.,� T, MATrIt jj F%I,LM. ;,arCat=eCe' I WoULG WILE T� SC t I M47rp Mor. F CLOSSA }' Oe LAC SA-iE COLORC 'i 'q 0+r"MCIAi4 Ae. cx iI-),i L, , / 14—, Ma•s GawR Ca�eP 1 ^ e--t-g ro r.' wvi oc,.r-r ,•^i IS ✓ek- Soep AS A MILc£O USor Srr'Q. L pf,.fT10,J Se'1M1; T �`1.�Y! Siw S! v9arr STILL iJMV Te SCc OwcS S. ,-�E cMI LAA~Srryap^ Iz �e Kc tc us w-�IoJ iLacs I+v^ ••I It Rt. (e) JOAA—. SpACS-i Mac Itfl-6 2cr.MaO 7 t> WE Nt;eo Te['«� '1 �T/LL 4Nc�rWtrb A<'�'r IO�ufl-N. J,4.- OoE.S A ✓IS:T.-L LINO THE /NIA ? NOTICE NOTICE IS IIEREBY GIVEN 'iIIAT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION HAS BEEN pRLPAkED FDR the application of Mr. Fred Sahadi for aporova' of plans and elevations to construct a 79 room inn on property known as 1875 S. Bascom Ave. #780-790(The Pruneyard) in a C-2-S(General Comuercial) Zoning District. TINS PRUIE(T WILL BL CONSIDERED FOR APPROVAL BY 'DU: CITY OF CM2,ULL ON March 25, 1986 INTERESTED PERSONS MAY REVILIv A COPY OF SAID NEGATIVE DECLARATION ON FILE IN THE 01 FICE OF 711E Planning DEpART%NT, C*PBELL CITY HALL, 70 NORTII FIRST STkEFI', WIPBELL, CALIFORNIA. i 1 PUBLISII ONE TIME: i CITY OF CAMPBELL 1875 S. BASCOM S 86-03 2 of 2 CAMPBELL ` - 4 Y 4.' N i Ty «ems 'K - �. .l .n. AI mil...— �.�f 1a'�-+l.�j�.*li'.L' ,t .. �•�p UL AMM" __ ._._ No 41 w, � �• � � Wit,: , ,..,� _ ,f- i I •�• tib ,pY N , CAMPBELL AVE. -� ✓✓✓�' ; .I:+mot F@ v ,, L• ft� , r M ARROYO SECO N N O ' I I ,Z . ,-T , •,� ei T�'17 SI 8 '-1 BI II T; (,,I i 5 7 e 9 i n itz� 1IJj lid T151 c, D� A-� a--s- t b w Pa e�3 Tth s = Y K--har' 1z y r� 5 � ✓mod �vT- ���� �— �jl� �-�a ca-C �i 1�--� Q� T- �� t-IhU ",- Vr ruuLIUM I -Wi ,Sall -iiof-c fflcrcucil Xcwa 750 RIDDER PARK DRIVE SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95190 IN THE l'.1TY Ilk UNU113H.I. .................................................. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA .....................5a......................... :.......................... ................ ..................... d. :~ I...I..r . :r-.":,.rr.�+r...........rk .....................i:it4ll?uf:.l.r,....1:13.. 1.a(1U8. ............... .ra•• `SI,., [.ar •ra.•w"+a-,...,... ................................................................................................. ................................ �urlc> ut Henrincs No .. nall..a ..Y STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ss Tna vWan —. bap I.sl t1" «.om, Oat—.nci — TIYI at N Imps n«e.Yn« mBMpnaJ an Y 1)IQM .IL.n1 raS .np sa . of - "ad SLIM. ww -ape d epn— yawn. d rol •party to nv n«aale0 -tulle 1 a— ont— pxa.0agi..n r...I aro m.ap 4 YW Imes arW fli a Ila prncynal Ciao, d IIY pnrr .ncl ,,— d III. San J M.c ry Ila+t, a nar.p.pr oI paneral NCWaIa.I pnlM arW pvbsMa Casy n It. of San Josa n Yd C—nly 0 Santa Cur.. SI«a of (gl.yn., Inal Yp San J M«cu No— a arW ras oI p. . • areas -- �Ymnuo narsp.par naral s — la s oaruxo 4y Seams 6pp0 .N ea.�^'V O a CovemnYni 4.s. of In. slue of G— aul.,+l.a. ---d py Y.n sacipns. Ina waan p t++Wleau In labprapv[ r .no nuepw�e o . prvYr« va Uva INe Wlvi:rlm rl d w.a'7 WCscrioan, a oe+olN Iu a n {+uWatN In rnl.mYnt v • gncu« [rsi. pclesunuy 1 uwp. r - v q.urnu.alm, p anal m d .nY [Y^ow of pen [rsses. poi aics.vYn. Irape:, Gi',mp..' w Oancvu�wlw.rl:ul ,II N Inrc. Yp nlr.p.p« bs ban MI«r4s.aG. pni W .r4 WddYo n Ila —..! cIY[d San ,krse n aap C ,Iy area Sl.1a al raprl« n an.k Iv rva Ifrn pY yaY paceaaap IR lasl pud�:al�vr of Ita rolcn Mr«n manl a- Ilal not YI n lyq rol ewer — --p— .. rr preee:lW r. rums pmao ti E 1. lap a roI at INn rro.rprN, ' O,p .M a.p6srp n p«Yrtl lermi IIY prr.M an0 cnu.cla of IIY nOlrp Inrar va lob - Mrl — C.ppvp d Wa[n k avY.aO a . Ir a pnlao cC{ry. rn pudSMd YW pnlW n Yp IwWi M IN IMwYp blaa IOrtl'. March 12, 1986 ..................................................... IJalaO n 6an J— Cab[+. al.......... _ 13th._._...._...._.__....aqa....March................. .... _...._ is 66............... __...... i a.w[a Ialek wrb a OoMr +I.1 ar bJ.prlo r/apl./.ro/'ca/[w. 601at....:�..c�......I`.TFL._.................._....._._.......... .a ... rpca ar[. CI L(a pM« area pA•ala, a Sap Jw. Wrgry N— I m ►UBLIC BEARING HAILING LABELS ►lease type mailing labels for the attached list of parcel numbers. FORMAT TOP 3/4": File / S 36-03 Applicant: Mr_ Fred Sahadi P.C. Mtg.7 3125/96 LABELS SHOULD INCLUDE Name (First names first) Address City, State, 6 Zip Code A.P.N. NEEDED BY: �tc DISTRIBU110N 1. Original Labels - Hail 2. Copied labels - One copy for CC for mailing* (Hold In file until P.C. takes action.) 3• Copy of labels - In file 4. Copy of labels - Recording Secretary 5• Copy of labels - City Clerk* (Hold in file until P.C. takes action) *Omit for Use Permits and Variance VI V Iff CAMP11E11 ?0 NORTH FIRST STREET CAM PSELL. CALIFORNIA 95008 (4081666 2100 Department Planning March S, 1986 f TICE OF K5ARINGS Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the Citv of Campbell has set the hour of 7:311 p.m., or shortly thereafter, on Tuesday, March 25, 1986 in the Citv Hall Council Chambers, 70 N. F'_rst St., Campbell, California, as the time and place for public hearing on the following: 1. PD 8S-06 - 900 E. Hamilton Ave. - Mr. Thomas Fleischli - to allow extension of develorment rights for previcusly approved project. 2. TA 86-01 - City -initiated text amendment to revise the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Campbell. A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this amendment. 3. UP 86-03 - 875 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd. - use permit to allow establishment of liquor store - C-1-S (Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning District - Pahwa Enterprises - APN 403-9-57. A Negative Declaration has been prepared, and is on file in the Planning Office, for the following project: 4. S 86-03 - 1875 S. Bascom Ave. (`780-790 The Pnuneyard) - plans and elevations to construct 79-room inn in existing shopping center - Mr. Fred Sahadi - C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District - APN 288-4-7, 8, 9. Maps, legal descriptions, and plans for subject proposals are on file in the Planning Department, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. Interested persc-.. may appear at said hearing and be heard. PLANNING C USSION CITY OF CMIPBELL ARTMIR A. KEF. SECRETARY PUBLISH ONE TIME: Wednesday, March 12, 1986 Extra Section RECEIPT CITY OF CAMPBELL CAMPBELL. CALIFORNIA NAME - FOR,,// REVENUE ACCOUNT NO FUND NUMBER / CNECn� \ MONEY 0 CASR GATE 4M NT THIS EECEIPT MUST BE MA NINE 18 24-96 2012 +•+• 750.CC VALIDATED AND SIGNED BELOW, I F3n-86 712Q12A h+750.C1 a 4206�„ ., CITY OF CAMPBELL anMCO/1 I Do ` n 1 1I96b rLANN 1 N6 COMP 1: ION L,7 JO A/�L ICATION CITY OF CAMPBE1LL PLEASE N TE: SIAFI��Y9'� � STATE LAN' 70 NATIFI' APPLICANTS OF ThE MIPM= OF THEIR APPLICATIONS. ON L)' T PSE APPLICATIONS WHICH ARE FOUND TO BE MVLEI'E CAN BE POSTED ON A PLANNING (MISSIION AGENDA. DATE: February 2o. 19st, FILE NO. / J�'—D- q PROPERTY LOCATION: 1875 Bascom Avenue, if APN: 40,0 -1 ` ?I 8� ` ZONTC: G-Z-S APPLICATION Architectural Approval Use Permit Planned Development Permit Zone Change General Plan Amendment Variance S Other: Site Approval ------------------------------------- APPLICANT: Nine: Fred Sahadi Telephone: 171-nail Address: 1901 S. Bascom Ave.. Suite 900 City/State: Campbell, CA Zip: 95008 ------------------------------------- PROPERTY OWNER: Name: Fred Sahadi Teleph011e: 371-0811 Address: 1901 S. Bascom Ave., Suite 900 City/State: Campbell, CA Zip: 95008 ------------------------------------- I/We the undersigned person(s) having an interest in the above described property hereby make the above application(s) in accordance with the pro- visions of the Campbell Mmicipal Code, and I/We hereby certify that the information given herein is true and correct the bes mf our know- ledge and belief. gna2tII'e REG.0 Sighatumm 11 ENVIRONPE NTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT I[MVIwON—TAL CM<CKLIaT TO K Ua-D •♦ — CITY OF CANPSKLL IN YAI{IMO (MITI AL STUDY 1. BAOmICU/D NAMF OF PROPONENT: Utz _ Yoko ADDRESS OF PRCPONFNT: �9OI 4 �1✓!'r1'l Ay,- 9911K 900 f_ A� C*' -A5,00-b TELEPHONE: ('to ) DATE OF CHECKLIST SUBMITTED: v Z D G AGENCY REOUIRING CHECKLIST: NAME OF PROPOSAL (IF APPLICABLE):�l�j—Y% L J 11. cW IIOMRlTAL IMMCYS i—I-1,VATIONa OF ALL aA AND K&YIC µasiwa AM MOUIM O ON ATTACMID tM«T) n!I YATK MO I. EARTH. Will the proposal result in: A. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? ❑ C b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? ❑ ❑ x C. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? ❑ ❑ d. The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? ❑ ❑ e. Any increase in wind or eater erosion of soils, either on or off the site? ❑ ❑ f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion whic. may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? ❑ ❑ g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? ❑ ❑ �( 1 of 6 pages vie rwr�x wo ?. AIR. Will proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or doterioration of ambient air quality? ❑ ° b. The creation of objectionable odors? ❑ ❑ C. Alteration of air mo':ement, moisture or tempera- ture, or any change in climate, either locally ° or regionally? ° 3. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? ❑ ❑ b. Changes in absorption rates, drainace patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? ❑ ❑ -. Alterations to the course or fl,w of flood waters? ❑ ❑ P� d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? ❑ ❑ J e. Discharge into surface wate.-s, or in any altera- tion of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? ❑ ❑ ✓ l� f. Alteration to the direction or rate of fl— of ground waters? ❑ ❑ 1( g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either r through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? ° ❑ h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? ❑ ❑ i. Exposure of people or propertu to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? ❑ ❑ �( i. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? ❑ ❑ �L P� b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? r ❑ C. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? ❑ ° d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? ❑ ❑ x ? of 6 pages - � 1 nS 1.MY" " 5. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfacna)? o ❑ x b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of a..imals? ❑ ❑ fie/ 'C c. Introduction of new spe- es of animals into an area, or result in a lari.er to the migration or movement of animals? ❑ c x d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? ❑ ❑ �( 6. NOISE. Will the rrop.sal .esult in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? ❑ ❑ b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ❑ ❑ AMC 7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? ❑ p / 1T i8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an I area? ❑ ❑ 9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? ❑ ❑ x b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? ❑ ❑ 10. RISK OF UPSET. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion Or she release of hazardous sub- stances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? ❑ ❑ 'p( 11. POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, Or growth rate of the human population of an area? ❑ ❑ 12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? ❑ ❑ 3 of 6 pages Vff YwV �[ NO 13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result ir.: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement. ❑ ❑ b. Effects on exisring parki:.g facilities, or demand for new parking? ❑ c c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? ❑ ❑ ❑ d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and,ior goods? ❑ ❑ e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? ❑ ❑ A f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicl:s, bicyclists or pedestrians? ❑ c 14. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? c x ❑ b. Police protection? ❑ ❑ c. sclnols7 ❑ a A d. Parks or other recreational facilities? ❑ ❑ Yr— e. Maintenance of public facilities. including roads? ❑ ❑ 17� f. Other governmental services? ❑ ❑ 15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? ❑ ❑ x b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new r3urces of energy? ❑ ❑ 16. UTILTTIES. Will the proposal result in a need fo. new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: E3 cX a. Power or natural gas? ❑ ❑ b. Communications systems? ❑ ❑ c. Water? ❑ ❑ d. Sewer or septic tanks? ❑ ❑ e. Storm water drainage? ❑ ❑ A f. Solid waste and disposal? ❑ ❑ INK 0 of 6 pages K{ WYeC MU 17. HOMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? ❑ ❑ b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? ❑ ❑ x I I 18. AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the Obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or w'11 the proposal result in the creation j of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? ❑ ❑ >( 19. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? o ❑ 20. ARCHEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? ❑ ❑ 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a. Does the project have the potent_al to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? n ❑ b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, tc the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a rela- tively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the ! future.) ❑ ❑ VrI j C. Does the project have impacts whichare indiv- ideally limited, but a I&ti v&Iy considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the _tal of those impacts on the environment is significant.) ❑ ❑ oIl �' d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ❑ ❑ x 5 of f paces III. DIeMf ION CW ENV IIONMENTAL NALWIT ION r -� IV. MTOWINATION A 11Yw w[VIn ING TMI aNVIwON1aLNTAI IMI0—T10N {UbNITT=O YT Tm AIILICANT. AND AITIw COYILETING TIE aNVIw KN TAL CMCCNLIST UG9 by TIE CITT Op CAY►W— IN MAKING AN "VIwONYaNTAL AateSsbbMT x7 find the propoed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the envsironment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. o I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the miti- gation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the pzoiect A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL HE PREPARED. o I find the proposed project MA}' have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. DATX Z4ji,6 sl o.wTuwc i T ITLt y /� IDw 7✓ F1 � �� 6 of 6 pages I EIR- i CI.i OF CAMPBELL, LALIFORNIA INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL INFORM.A ION FuF.X - TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT Dare Filed: 2/21/86 ,R ���M � GENERAL INFORMATION: L FFp - .1986 1. Name and address of developer or project sPGnV'W:(3F CAMP6ELL I ri`il ti;l l;i I1 Il'll y. Ha�c olll :'... -`IIIU, t�allpbcll, l:\ iIfWNING DEPARTMENT 2. Address of project: The Prun,,ard, is-S S. Bascou :Avenue Assessor's Block and Lot Number age 4, PArc."l 3. Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: Morris Stark. Iledley G Stark, Inr. :'•la I. i:unpbCll Ave., l'ampbcll (379-7404) 4. I.:dicate number of the permit application for the project to which this form pertains: 5. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those regri:ed by city, regional, state and federal agencies: 1101W 6. Existing zoning district: _ "< 7. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed): PROJECT DESCRIPTION (ATTACHED ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY) 8. Site size. \bout 1 112 acres of the 28.8 acre site 9. Square footage. :About 64,000 sq. ft. of the total 1,254,000. 10. Number of floors of construction. 2 11. Amount cf off-street parking provided. 19 + 9 employees = 88 12. Attach plans. 13. Proposed scheduling. Start construction May 1986 Complete construction `larch 1987 14. Associated projects. none 15. Anticipated incremental development. Could be two stage with the east ring excloped after certain leases expire, but a decision could be reached to buy out those leases and proceed as a single phase project also. 1 of 3 pages 16. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household size expected. 79 motel units 17. If commercial, indicate the type, whether -.ieighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities. A small cafe and a small impulse sales area is included within the atrium area. 18. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities. Not applicable. 19. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employ- ment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project. ,Not applicable. 20. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is zequired. Not applicable. Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). Yes No x 21. Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands, beaches, lakes or hills, cr substantial alteration of ground contours. x 22. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. x 23. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. x 24. Si;,.iificant amounts of solid waste or litter. x 25. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. 26. Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water quality or quanity, or alteration of existing drain- age patterns. _ X 27. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. x 28. Site on filled land or on slope of 10% or more. x 29. Use of disposal of potentially hazardous mater4als, such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives. x 30. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.) x 31. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.) X _ 32. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. To tic into the existing character of the Pruneyard conunercial complex. 2 of 3 pages a y-4 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 33. Describe the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspec'_s. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. 34. Describe the surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one -family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photo- graphs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that tLe statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my abi ity, and that the facts, statements, and information presente$re true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. a e Mgiature 3 of 3 pages _I a 33. & 34. The existing site consists of 4 or 5 stores whose leases are expired or about to expire plus several roofed but empty modules which have not been leased since the center opened. They are all located on the north side of the Pruneyard between Grodins and Food Villa. The site has been developed for several years as a regional shopping center and office tower complex. This specific project has only one exposure to adjacent property, a two story multi -family residential complex about 110 feet to the north at the closest point. The remainder of the commercial complex is a rambling, one and two story, spanish tile roofed development, vaguely early california ranch style. The existing courtyard and plaza on the south side of the new motel will be largely retained with some re -development and planting. The new building itself is generally two story with a typical roof height of about thirty feet but does contain a central tower about forty five feet in height with a thirty five foot high atrium behind it. The color scheme of the new addition will blend in with the existing complex. The roof tile will be salvaged existing tile where it is exposed to public view on the north and east sides and will be matched as closely as possible on the south or courtyard sides. The cement plaster will be a light complementary grayed tan with wood eaves and posts stained a weathered gray brown. Wrought iron "balcony" railings will be matte black. The canvas awnings and tower panels are intended to be more intense, gay colors to signify an old world market place and may range in the yellow -orange -terra cotta shades. CITY OF CAMPBELL 75 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE CAMPBELL• CA L I F 0 R N I A 95008 (408) 378-8141 Department: Planning EIR - j File M (S 86-09 L DECLARATION THAT AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT IS NOT REQUIRED (NEGATIVE DECLARATION) APPLICANT . `tr. Fred Sahadi ADDRESS 19C1 S. Bascon Ave. Suite 900, Campbell, CA 9500E PROJECT NAME Pruneyard Inn. ADDRESS 1873 S..Bascom. Ave. .780-7c:l Campbell, California Pursuant to the applicable sections of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 and City of Campbell Resolution No. 5164; and After review of plans and information supplied by the applicant pertaining to the captioned project, and after completing the attached initial study, the undersigned does hereby determine that the captioned project will have no siglficant effect (no substantial adverse impact) on the environment within the terms and meaning of said Act and Resolution. Executed at Campbell, California, this _' S day of /b­4 , 19 L . r�,aG A- lr ¢o Director or Official By: l°"- L_