S 90-01CITY OF 1650-1800 S. BASCOM S-90-01 1/5
CAMPBELL
1650 - 1600 S. Bascom S 90-01
Hunter Properties and M 90-11
qC
/f-13 -9D
PROPERTY OWNER
Deke Hunter -T�ter Property
20725 Valley Green Drive,Ste.100
Cupertino, CA 95014
Telephone No. 255-4100
ARCHITECT
Hagman Group
Architecture and Planning
1990 The Alameda
San Jose, CA 95126
241-1433
PROPERTY OWNER
FOR THE USE PERMIT
ags rom Properties
371 Village Square
Orinda, CA 94563
(415) 254-3076
-BF' A9i G6 r daji Np°x.C_ .IS a iLint d
r _i
HUNTER PROPFRTIES
� 1 _ v GREEN OR,vE
uI-E-10 CA I -I
��08� t55 •�M
May 6, 1993
Mr. Richard Saso
Pro -Sweep
P.O. Box 5 182
San Jose, CA 95150
Re: Hamilton Plaza
Dear Richard,
Pursuant to our conversation on April 6, 1993, you were requested to refrain from
sweeping the back of Hamilton Plaza between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and 6:30 a.m. You
agreed to comply with this request. This request was made due to complaints of residents
who are awakened in the middle of the night (1:30 to 3:30 a.m.) from the loud blowers
being used for the sweeping.
1 received a call today again from a resident who was awakened at 3:30 a.m. last
night by the glower. As this problem was resolved before, we were surprised a receive
another complaint.
Up to this time, your services have been very professional and we would like to
continue working with you, however please understand that it is crucial, not only from a
developer's point of view but also for the goodwul of the community, to respect
appropriate times for working.
This letter will serve as notice that it another complaint of this nature is received,
your service will be terminated immediately.
Thank you for your cooperation with this matter.
Sincerely yours,,
Paula Carder
Property Manager
POC:blm
cc:(City of Canrpbell Planning Department
PITY Of CAMPBEL
7 0 N O R T H F I R S T S T R E E T
C A M P B EL. CALIFOR N IA 95008
(408) 866 2100
FAX 9 (408) 379-2572
Depart. eS Tv Planning
Deke Hunter
Hunter Properties
20725 Valley Green Drive, Suite WO
Cupertino, CA 95014
April 7, 1993
Re: Architectural Lighting -- 1650-1800 S. Bascom Avenue
Dear Deke:
It has recently been brought to the Planning Department's attention that
additional lighting has been installed on thr light standards in the parking
area of the Hamilton Plaza Shopping Centel. It appears that this additional
lighting has been provided to light up the building facades and roof elements
during the evening. Both the intensity of this lighting, as well as its location,
on the light standards results in glare in the adjacent residential
neighborhoods.
Please contact the Planning Department within five days to discuss
modifications to this lighting and to address the issue of glare to the adjacent
residential areas.
Thank you for your cooperation in advance.
Sinc5e
l /
Tim J. aley
Associate Planner
tjh:lb
a:misclet
cc Steve Piasecki, Planning Director
7uy%l
I '
Z..
BREAD OF LIFE CAMPBELL 16905 Bascom Avenue Campbell. CA 95008 i408)371-5000. 1`a.(10813 784 -
;anuary 22. 1993
Mr. Tim Haley Z
Planning Department
City of Campbell
75 North Central Avenue
Campbell, CA 95008DEPAR1 MENT
Dear Tim, a' /
l
As 1 explained to you during, our telephone conversation on Friday, Bread of Life is currently
in the process of negotiating z new lease to continue to occupy our location at Hamilton Plaza.
For the last few years, Bread of Life has provided outside seating for our customers �n front of
our store. We would like to continue to provide tables and chairs is the same fashion.
Hunter Properties is willing to continue to allow this use pending city approval, if approval is
required. We would like to know if we need to obtain new approval from the City to continue
to provide seating, or if this use is grandfathered in due to the fact that the tables and chairs
have been in use for the past few years.
It shadd be noted that the seating does not interfere with handicapped access, nor will its
existence increase parking demand, due to the fact that the seating has been in use since before
the remodel of the center. Also, the style, appearance, and maintenance will be coordinated with
any other similar use at the center (i.e. Fresh Choice), and will he approved by the landlord.
We would like to provide up to 6 tables with 4 seats each. The tables may or may not include
an umbrella. Please let me know if any additional application is required in order for us to
continue to provide courtesy seating for our customers.
Sincerely,
Frank Ashton
President
406-396-6425 H NTER PROPERTIES 691 P02 JLL 15 ' 92 06: 50
2 u6 a .a a �e bl L1L i H Lu I L D I. .. • _ .
July 15. 1992
C,ty of Campbell
Plannlgg Department
70 North first Street
Campbell, CA 95008
Atten'. Tim llalcy
Itli; Jlamilton Plaza•Phasc II
Dear Tim:
I spoke with Dcke Jluntcr in n
Plaza as rofctcnced in your Icu
1992. Ile has agreed to have
Iwo to four weeks. Ile has ac
ibility with his signature belov
1s to the pending itc1m at Hamilton
dated October 17, 1991 and July s.
se items resolved/completed within
,pledged his scccplance of this respons
Upon receipt and review of this letter please sign off on out permit
card for Building '•11" as we ha discussed yesterday. "Thanks for ,our
assistance.
sincordly,
OC Cajlrl/ola
Walsh 53uilding Contractors
)eke l unto
Hunter Proport' s Inc
RV
,Eiji 1 +, 1992
CIT. L
PLPNN^'
PITY OF VAMP13F11
7 0 N O R T H F I R S T S T R E E T
C A M P 8 E LL. CAL IFORN ,A 95008
( 4 0 8 ) 866 2130
FAX 4 (408) 379-2572
Department:
Planning June 5, 1992
Mr. Bill Tester
Walsh Building Contractors
22 North Almaden Avenue
San Jose, CA 95110
RE: Building Shell Completion for Ross - 1650 South Bascom Avenue
Dear Bill:
The Planning Department conducted a final inspection of the building shell
located at on June 3, 1992, so that a clearance could be provided to the
Campbell Building Division. P.t the time of the project inspection, the
following items were found to be outstanding:
1. Designation of the parking spaces along the Bascom Avenue frontage as
compact.
2. Designation and marking of the parking spaces along the rear of the
building as well as definition designating loading areas.
3. The completion of the trash enclosures. The trash enclosures should
have gates for screening as well as being painted to match the building.
4. The rear of the building should be painted as well as utiiity boxes and
services
5. The trees planted along the rear property line should be protected by an
extruded asphalt curb or concrete curb (minimum 6 inches in height).
6. Appropriate signage or marking should be provided to ensure that the
rear service area [s identified as a fire lane.
A clearance is forwarded for the shell at this time, however, these items must
be addressed prior to occupancy.
_I/
CITY OF CAMPBELL
page two
letter regarding Building Shell at 1650 south Bascom Avenue
June 3, 1992
if you should have any questions regarding the above items, please do not
hesitate to contact the undersigned.
Sincerely,
Tim J. Haley
Associate Planner
cc Frank Mills, Building Division
Deke Hunter, Hunter Properties
Dave Kapler, Fire Department
qo c�
PITY IIF l"rNl'IREII
7 C N O R T H F I R S T S T R E E T
C A M P 0 E LL, CAL IFO RN IA 95008
(4081 866.2100
FAX • (408) 379-2572 April 14, 1992
Planning
Department.
Walsh Buildin) Contractors
22 North Almaden Avenue
San Jose, CA 95110
RE: 1760 South Bascom Budding Permit Application—Bizmart
Below is a list of concerns that the Planning Department has regarding the
Building
treferenced
dd essed before the PlanningDeparrtmentc np ao approve Building Pess. These issuerm t. be
1. Roof Equipment S:reeninj—Sub mit a sectionparapet
for the Planning
Director's approval that shows the height of the arapt and the location
and height of the roof equipment. Provide a roof plan depicting the
location of roof mounted equipment.
2. Proposed Tenant Improvements vs AVDigVed Building Shell —The
proposed tenant improveme:Its are not consistent with the approved
building shell.
3. Entrance and Exit Locations —The building's entrances and exits do not
correspond with the facade's architectural elements. For example: the
building entrance should be centered within the tower element.
Please contact me at (408) 866-2140, so we can discuss these issues further.
Sincerely,
Lynette Dias, Planner I
LC- Building Department
Gene Godstein Architect, A.I.A
6380 E. Tanque Verde, #100
Tucson, Arizona 85715
Deke Hunter
Hunter Properties
20725 V"lley Greene Dr., Suite 100
Cupertino, CA 95014
f> . ItsS.
l ITY OF CAMPBELL
7 0 N O R T H F 1 R S T S T R E E T
CAMPBE LL, CALIFO RN IA 95008
(408) 866-2100
FAX 0 (408) 3 7 9 - 2 5 7 2
Department March 6, 1992 1
Planning �
Mr. Bill Hagman
The H1g ran Group
1990 The Alameda
San Jose, CA 95126
Re: Tenant Improvements
Ross -- 1750 S. Bascom Avenue
Dear Bill:
The Planning Department has reviewed the above referenced tenant
improvement plan for the Ross store. One of the items presented on the
submitted plan indicates the installation of a satellite dish antenna, however,
a specific location has not been identifies.
A section of the Campbell Municipal Code requires thatsatellitedishes with a
diameter greater than three feet must be screened b appropriate architectural
features. Prior to the installation of the satellite dish, specific Planning and
Building Department approvals will be required.
ff you shoald have any questions regarding this item, please do not hesitate to
contact the undersigned.
Sincerely,
Tim J. Ha �eyy
Associate Planner
tjh:lb
a:planck
CC' Frank Mills, Building Department
HAGM AN
n JAN 2 4 1992
Jaruary 29, 1992
Mr. Tim Haley
city of Cmpbell
70 N. First Street
Cmupbell, CA 95008
RE: Hamilton Plaza Phase II
Dear Tim:
This letter is irh zegard to the la,riscaPLx3 fc- the abare protect.
As you know, this was a two phase Prop where the site
its were done with the first phase. There are a few
pockets of landscape installed with Phase II. No lardsc-pe
drawings were done for Phase II; therefore, we are issuing this
letter of intention.
The raised planters in frcc,t of the new building will be planters
like the ethers on site. Pots will also be added & , in Phase I.
The planter along the Ieng's building will also be cleaned up and
planted in character.
If there are any 9uestians, please call.
Sincerely, i
Lewis J. Alverrm
project Architect
IJA:kj
CITY OF C,AMPBELL
I 7 0 N O R T H F I R S T S T R E E T
C AMPBELL, CAL IFORNIA 950'6
14081 866-2100
I FAX 8 (408) 379-2572
Department Panning January 3, 1992
Mr. Bill Hagman
The Hagman Group
1990 The Alameda
San Jose, CA 95126
Re: Phase it - Hamilton Plaza
1650-1750 S. Bascom Avenue
Dear Bill:
The Planning Department has reviewed your submittal to the Building
Department for the proposed A & F buildings in Phase II of 1;arnilton Plaza
Shopping Center.
Based upon this review, the following comments are offered:
1. Sheets C-2, L-2, L-4, and L-6 do not reflect the current site layout and
site plan as presented on A-1.1 and A-22.
2. The presented lans do not addrethe
planter areas nfront of building A and King srefurbishing of the raised
Table.
3 y driveway o uld be and g L provided between the walkway along
the
4. A concern is raised regarding the symmetric appearance of the
buildingentranceraised
poss bly rotating the plante s 90
suggested degrees and having 2 in
this area.
5. Sheet A-3.1 and A-3.2 - A concern is raised regarding the lack of
architectural detailing and general aesthetic appeal of the rear and
side elevations. It is recommended that both horizontal and
vertical elements be introduced into these building elevations to
help reduce the scale and improve the builidng appearance.
CITY OF CAMPBELL
Mr. Bill Hagman
Re: Phase II - Hamilton Plaza
January 3, 1992
Page 2
6. Sheet A-3.2 - It is recommended that the phone and electrical boxes
be incorporated into a room at the rear of building B.
7. Sheet A-2.2 - The concrete walkway along the south elevation of
building B should be reviewed in light of handicap access as well as
establishment of a banded concret-, pattern, which has been us?d
throughout the remainder of the center.
If you should have any questions regarding any of the above items, please do
not hesitate to contact the undersigned.
Sincerely,
CJ �/
Tim J. Haley
Planner II
tjh:lb
a:misclet
cr. frank Mills, Building Department
Deke Hunter
Hunter Properties
20725 valGreen Drive
Suite 100
Cupertino, CA 95014
Ak
CITY OF CAMPBELL
7 0 N O R T H F I R S T S T R E E T
C A M P B E LL, CAL IFORN IA 95008
(400; 866-2100
FAX a (408) 379-2572
Department.
Planning
Deke Hunter
Hunter Properties
20725 Valley Green Drive
Suite 100
Cupertino, CA 95014
Re: S 90-01
1650-1800 S. Bascom Avenue
October 17,1991
Dear Deke:
As a follow-up to our meeting of October 16, 1991, and our review of the
completeness letter dated October 4, 1991, the Planning Department has the
following understanding regarding the project deficiencies:
1. The installation of tree wells and trees along the rear property line
will be deferred to Phase II of the project. The issue of possibly
modifying the previous proposal to include a combination of
climbing vines and trees along the rear property line will be
investigated.
2. Landscaping will be installed adjacent to the trellis structure,
adjacent to Robway Avenue.
3. Handicapped access will be provided.
4. The installed lighting is acceptable along the southerly property line
if the conduit is painted out.
5. The landscaping and service area to the rear of the Goodyear
building will be r-viewed and studied further with Phase U of the
project.
6. Trees will be installed.
7. Handicapped parking spaces will be d-signated.
CITY OF CAMPBELL
Deke Hunter
Re: 1650-1800 S. Bascom Avenue
October 17,1991
Page 2
8. Compact parking spaces will be designated.
9. Stop and/or Yield signs should be installed, consistent with the
attached site plan.
10. Striping of the parking spaces along the rear of the stores will be
completed.
11. Painting of the vertical elements for the raised planters will be
investigated.
12. Existing planting areas in front of King's Table will be cleaned up at
this time, and replanted in conjunction with Phase II of the project,
and
13. The height of the sign pole on the southerly driveway will be
adjusted.
If you have a different understanding regarding the resolution of the above
matters, please do not hesitate to give me a call.
Sincerely,
1 way
Tim J. Haley
Planner II
tjh:lb
a:misclet
cc Sill Hagmd i,
OJT
Hunter Properties November 19, 1991
20725 Valley Green Drive
Hamilton 6 Bascom Phase
Suite 100 I2
Cupertino, CA 95014 91022
Deke Hunter
c.,
Tim Haley indicated yesterday, November 18. 1991, that the new
addition can be 22,600 square feet.
Please call me regarding this.
William W. Hagman, AIA
Lewis Alvernas
Tim Haley
CITY OF CAMPBELL
7 0 N O R T H F I R S T S T R E E T
CAMPBFLL. CAL IFO RN IA 95 00 8
(408) 866-2100
FAX • (408) 379-2572
Department: Pla:ming October 4,1991
Mr. Bob McKenna
Walsh Building Contractor
22 N. Almaden Avenue
San Jose, CA 95110
Re: S 90-01 - 1650-1800 South Bascom Avenue
Dear Mr. McKenna:
The Planning Department has conducted a final inspection of the above
referenced project so that a clearance may be forwarded to the Building
Department for final occupancy. At the time of inspection on October 4, 1991,
the following deficiencies were noted:
1. Along the rear property line, tree wells have not been installed,
consistent with the approved landscaping plan.
2. Landscaping has not been installed at the trellis structure, adjacent
to Robway Avenue.
3. Handicap access should be provided from Robway Avenue along
the pedestrian path. Currently, a raised curb inhibits this
movement.
4. The approved site plans indicate the provision of light standards
along the southerly property line of the project. A modification to
that approval should be obtained. The conduit to these lights
should be painted.
5. Landscaping should be installed to the rear and to the south of the
Goodyear service building.
6. Trees should be planted in the planting area, adjacent to the
southerly driveway, as indicated on the approved landscape plan.
7. The handicapped parking stalls should be designated with emblems
painted both on the pavement and with signage in front of the
CITY OF CAMPBELL
Mr. Bob McKenna
Re: 1650-1800 S. Bascom Avenue
October 4,1991
Page 2
handicapped stalls.
8. The parking spaces adjacent to the tree wells in the front Darking
area should be designated as compact.
9. The main entry driveway in front of Bread of Life should be
reviewed in terms of the placement of "Stop" or "Yield" signs.
10. The striping of parking spaces along the rear of the stores should be
completed and parking spaces adjacent to the building should have
appropriate wheel stops.
11. The raised planting areas in front of the building . hould be painted,
consistent with the wall colors of the building.
12. The planting areas in front of King's Table should be replanted, and
13. The height of the handicap notification sign, and wrong way sign
pole along the southerly side of the soutierly driveway should be
shortened.
If you have any questions regarding any of the above items, you may contact
the undersigned at 866-2140.
Sincerr 1
Tim J. Haley
Planner 11
ca Deke Hunter
Hunter Properties
20725 Valley Green Drive
Suite 100
Cupertino, CA 95014
Mark Nadvornik, Building Department
CITY OF CAMPBELL
MEMORANDUM - 8
Steve Piasecki oan:July 16,1991
To: Planning Director
-w
1
F. : Tim J. Haley
Planner 11
&44N Summary Action - Site and Architectural Review
Committee Meeting of July 16, 1991 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
--------------------------------
The Site and Architectural Review Committee met on July 16, 1991 to discuss
the following items:
1. S 91-07 - 1265-1271 Burrows Road - Kurt Anderson - Construction of
4 single-fa-nfly homes - Committee recommends approval of this
item.
2. M 90-16 - 1650-1800 S. Bascom Avenue - Bill Hagman - Color
Scheme - The Committee recommends approval of this item.
cc Bud Alne
David Fox
Jane Meyer -Kennedy
CITY OF CAMPBELL
7 0 N O R T H F I R S T S T R E E T
CAMPBELL. CAL IFORNIA 95008
( 4 0 6 ) a 6 6 - 2 1 0 0
I FAX t (408i 379.2572
Deph"M�u. Planning July 1(
Deke Hunter
Hunter Properties
20725 Valley Green Drive
Suite 100
Cupertino, CA 95014
Re: M 90-11
1650-18W S. Bascom Avenue
Parking Modification - Fresh Choice
Dear Deke:
Please be advised that the Planning Director has approved your request to
eliminate three (3) parking spaces in front of the Fresh Choice tenant space to
accommodate outside seating. A copy of the approved plan is enclosed for
your records. Please note that this apprcval does not permit additional
seating beyond the 24 seats prviously app-owed by the Planninb
Commission.
stions regarding the above
approval,please do not hes tatee to contact theePlanning Department at (408)
866-2140.
Sincere
Tim J. Hal
Planner 11
oc Bill Hagman
Hagman Group
1990 The Alameda
San Jose, CA 95126
Building Department (Plans)
CITY Of CAMPBELL
7 0 N C R T N F I R S T S T R E E T
C A M P a E L L C A L I F O R N I A t s 0 0 t
1AOt) 166 1100
FAX • 1.061 319 2572
peWme" Planning June 17, 1991
Deke Hunter
Hunter Properties
20725 Valley Green Drive, Ste. 100
Cupertino, CA 95014
Re: Building Colors - 1650-1800 South Bascom Avenue
Dear Deke:
Pursuant to your request and consistent with your memorandum dated
February 11, 1"1, the Planning Department is following up on the
information requested in the attached letter. Your .asbtance in addressing
each of these items would be appreciated. if you should have any questions
regarding these items, please do not hesitate to give me a call at %&2140.
Sincerely,
l�
Tim J., HYky
Planner 11
Enclosure:
1, February 14,1991 letter
cc: Hagman Group - Architecture and Planning
1990 The Alameda
San Jose, CA 95126
1'IT) 13F 1'a.ti119BEIL
7 0 N O R T N F 1 R S T 5 T R E E T
C AMPBEL L. CALIF ORNIA 95008
1a08, 8 6 6 - 2 1 0 0
FAX 0 -4081 779 2572
Planning
February 14, 1991
D"11me t
Nr, Doke Hunter, Jr.
Hunter Properties
20725 Valley Green Drive
Suite No. 100
Cupertino, CA 95014
RE: Issuance of Building Permits - N 90-11South Bascom 6AoenueB00
Dear Deke:
Pursuant to your request and consistent with
your memorandum, dated
February 11, 1991, the Planning Department has released the
building permits for your proiect at the corneurocomaalitment tomilton
Bascom Avenues. This release is based upon y
address the following issues:
d Color Scheme: Based upon the renderings which
1. tine an
on February
ing
ion
were presented to
thatnyou submits the photographs of these
1990' it is requ
renderings and a color material sample board for consider a
the Site and Architectural ReviewCONittO
thism
recall, the original appproject indicatade. As YOU yau grey
color building with blue roofs. The proposed changes a
indicated on the renderhissvaries
concept, consequently mattarshouldabalally mreferradbacksto
the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The staff
response to the submitted renderings and the color scheme is
generally favorable.
of the
2, ylvina Hall: Details soaeddbatweenbe vthedill
Pay N-pakbuidingand
treatment which is propand of
theat the south
planseshouldiindicatenboth the architectural tdetailse&a well
se
as the planting of this area.
. 1..w« ctandards: A note should be provided regarding the
1. of the light standards in the parking area to a
repainting
color to match to roof and grit iron tra:atnant, and,
4 Tree Welll; The site plan shouldblineamended
indicated c onthe
tree walls along the rear Property
approved landscape plan.
CITY OF CAMPBELL
page two
If you should have any questions regarding the above items, please
itgstwillhesitate
have to bacontact
addreasedPlanning
cDepartment.
occupancy ofAthell onowthese
buildings.
Sincerely,
Tin J. ley
Planner II
cc: Building Division
Joe Capriola
Nalsh Building Contractors
22 North Almaden Avenue
San Jose, CA 95110
CITY OF CAMPBELL
page two
If you should have any quest ins regarding the above items, please
g Department.
itemstwillitate to have to benaddressedtact the ppriornto occupancy ofAtne new
ll of hese
buildings.
Sincerely,
/T .
Tim J. ley
Planner II
cc: Building Division
Joe Capriole Contractors
Walsh Building
22 North Almaden Avenue
San Jose, CA 95110
A4
HUNTER PROPERTIES
p715 VALLEY GREEN p
SUITE
c UVER r- GA 950�A
'.1 311 -
MEMORANDUM
TO: The City of Campbbell
70 North First Street
Campbell, California 95008
Anne Mr. Tim J. Haley
Re'. Unresolved Planning Issues
CIT Y y VEPAHImLNT`
P L/.N NINE
Date February 11, 1991
Project Name Hamilton
Plaza
:Pursuant to our desire to obtain our buildirg permit, it has
Memo planning
been brought to my attention that there are two p
issues that need additional
arifi-ntthe aoutheastion. The ucorner
pertain to the "living
building, and the painting program for
pad and the Pay
the entire center.
The living wall does not at this time have any specific
drawings. It is our intention
oitto installation Planning
su
Department drawings prior
The paint scheme for the proeg`andhas
been
esoftcolorsehave a
abli
general form. The color YP our attention the
been selected. I will_ showingnd to ythese
colors.
photographed rendering'
In the spirit of staying on schedule,these
I would like . have
the occupancy permit conditioned upon two items. This
he ability to fine tune these
will allow us both t
outstanding issues.
Please call me if this creates a problem.
By* Deke Hunter, Jr.
cc.
'rF �Y rr,' F, R R f"
(n
CITY OF C A M P B E L L LANDSU PE AGREEMENT FEB 0 6 1991
CITY
a 'ANWN:
FILE /: SITE ADDRESS: �(/�c I !`c E�+`%F�•. k.•(-=.. ,
APPLICANVOWNER: tkf•1, ('I ^t',
DATE PROJECT APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION:
The applicant/owner of the above -referenced project does hereby agree to
the following condition, which was approved as a part of this application:
In lieu of the Landscape Bond requested as a condition
of the above -referenced approval. I do hereby agree to
the alternate condition that the proposed development
as described above shall not receive final Building
Department clearance until the landscaping which was
required, and accepted, as a part of such approval has
been completely installed and accepted by the Planning
Director of the City of Campbell.
21-
Signed: �l
*Authority: /
Date: 2 P -z _
*Note: This agreement shall be signed before a Notary by the owner,
developer or his agent, or any persons having an equitable
interest in the development.
NOTARY TUBLIC:
(County of Santa Clara,
CORPORATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
No att
----
State of California Onthistne_ 8 da of Februar y _ _ 19-2l, before me,
55.
County of _Santa Clara Jeanne Morrison
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
Deke Hunter, JR.
X personally known tome
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence
I[ANNEMORRISON lots the personlsl who executed the within instrument as
NOTPRY KiBLIG-CALIfMIA
S.lNIA t.LARA COUNfy Development_ fi_Qn B111taRL oron behalf of the corporation therein
F fM:aniar bprn W ,,, :11t named, and acknowledged to me that the corporation executed it.
WITNEF' ny hand and official met.
Tel
MTION1l NOTM •aSOGIATpN • tY01Y WMun awe • •O em MTS • woaara NIY. CA �11M
F
F CAMPBELL
H F I R S T S T R E E T
C A L I F 0 R N IA 95008
(408) 866-2:00
FAX 8 (408; 379-2572
February 7, 1991
DepanmentP��
1 Doke Hunrtsr
1hmt,er Properties
20725 Valley Green Drive, Spite 100
civertino, CA 95014
RF: S 90-01/1650-18100 S. Bascom AverVAe
Utility Transfmters and Gas Meter iocaticns
Dear Doke:
Please be advised that the plarwq Director has conditionally approved the
placements of the utility transformers and gas meters for the above referenced
project. This approval is subj. t to the condition that the landscaping plan be
modified to provide more substantial screening arowud the proposed utility
transformer, adjacent to the corner pad retail building. The remauder of the
transformer and gas mete* locations shah on the site plans A-1.1 and A-1.2 dated
February 1, 1991, are considered acceptable.
The Planning Director's approval is subject to the following eord1ticns:
1, All electrical utility boxes placed on the exterior of the build -'jig doll
be painted to match the building wall colors; and,
2. Revised plant materials shall br- provided around the transformer pad,
shown adjacent to the retail building on the corner. A screening shrub
null be provided around the perimeter of this transformer, so that it is
not visible from the parking area or the street.
A further review of the site plans as depicted on sheets A-1.1 and A-1.2 indicates
the following inconsistencies or deficiencies:
1 The rear property line does rent indicate tree wells as shown on the
landscaping per; and, tided along the sidewalk
2. As necessary that handicap[ access is not prov
proposed, adjacent to the driveway at the southerly portion of the
project.
matters uK%ild be red. If you should
havea review and attention ng � f the above items, Please do not hesitate to
any 9uemti
contact the Planning Department.
Sincerely,
Tim J. ley
Planvrer II
eo, -talsh Cmstruction/Joe Capriole
The Hagman Group/Ivuis
PG&E/R. J. TaujiWUra Mills
Building DepartMmt/Frank
CITY OF CAMPBELL
70 IJ OR TH FIRST STREET
CAMPBELL. CALIFORNIA 95008
(400)866-2100
FAX 0 (406) 379-2572
Dapanmarn:
Planning December 28, 1990
Deke Hunter
Hunter Properties
20725 Valley Green Drive
Suite 100
Cupertino, CA 95014
RE: Pedestrian access (walkway)
1650-1800 S. Bascom Ave.
Dear Deke:
lease be advised that the Planning Department has received a complaint
P
regarding a lack of access to the Hamilton Plaza Shopping Center from
the Robway Avenue sidewalk area. The Planning Department acknowledges
tha:. you intend to eventually improve this area with a concrete walkway
to our new building addition. Howevel, helpirim it would be
ful if a temporary asphalt walkway ispr provided.
If you would like to discuss this issue, please do not hesitate to
contact the undersigned at (408) 866-2140.
Sincerely,
Tim J. Haley
Planner II
tjh:ljb
c:m90-16
cc: Steve Piasecki, Planning Director
Bill Helms, Engineering Manager
Item b2
Added findings and conditions Hunter Properties S 90-01
FINDINGS:
1. The site currently generates noise levels which impact the
quiet of adjoining residential areas.
2. The proposed development will potentially add to the noise
generated from the delivery area along the easterly and northerly
property lines
CONDITIONS:
1, OISE ATTEN�A71ON-PHASE 1
The applicant shall install an 8 ft. high masonry acoustical
barrier along the easterly, and north-arly property lines which
adjoin residential zoned parcels. Alternativeiy, the applicant
Tay use the existing carporUgaraoe structures to provide an
equivalen- sound attenuation orovided he/she demonstrates
the following:
1) Written agreement with all affected residential
property owners to allow the necessary upgrades and
structural connections to ensure an air tight wall of a
sufficient density to achieve a noise reduction
equivalent to an 8 ft. high acoustical barrier.
2) Instail landscaping and irrigation in -ie areas between
the service drive and acoustical wali and carports.
3) Demonstrate ability to ensure long term maintenance
of the carport walls and acoustical barriers to ensure
the effectiveness of the barrier.
4) The masonry wall and upgrades of the the carport
structures shall be completed under the supervision of an
acoustical engineer to ensure an air tight construction
for maximum sound attenuation.
The final wall plan shall be approved by the Site and
Architectural Committee prior to release of building permits.
2) Ij.,IS . ATTENUABON PHASE 2
The applicant shall submit a separate acoustical analysis and
mitigation plan for approval by the Site and Architectural
Committee prior to commencement of construction of phase 2
improvements. The plan shall evaluate noise levels associated
with the anticipated user of the phase 2 area an( ' :ecommend
appropriate mitigation measures, which may include but are
not limited to to following:
1) Construction of an 8 ft. high acoustical barrier along
the area adjacent to phase 2 improvements.
Construction
odangdocktsecondary
o screennacoustical barrier
oisef from loading and unloading
activities.
g) DE IVFRY HOURS
Deliveries to the service area shall be restricted between the
hours of 7 a.m. and 7 P.M. daily. The loading dock area shall be
posted to inform drivers of the restriction. The
applicant/property owner shall assume full responsibility for
enforcement of this condition.
1.1.1-Y OF CAMPRILL
7 u N O R T H F I R S T S T R E E T
CAMP BELL. C A L I F 0 R N I A 95008
(408) 866-2100
FAX a (408)379-2572
Planning November 15, 1990
Department:
Deke Hunter
Hunter Properties
20725 Valley Green Dr., Ste. 100
Cupertino, CA 95014
RE: Landscape, Irrigations, Li.ihtinq, and Pedestrian Plan
1650-1800 S. Bascom Avenue
S 90-01
Dear De:ke: at its
Please be advised that the Planning
ningthe aCommissiove enced plans usubject tolar
of November 13, 1990, app
the attached conditions, and as red -lined. Please note that revise
plans should be submitted, addressing the following concerns:
Site Plan:
1) The trash enclosure shown along the Bascom Avenue
frontage should be
ear of the
proposed retail relocated hr
pad at theornerofBasc m and
Hamilton Avenues.
2) The revised site plan should show the provision of a
pedestrian walkway along the southerly driveway. A
minimum 4 foot walk and a 6 inch carb should be
provided to define this walkway.
Landscape and Irrigation Plan: A revhe f llowised s cape ng issues and irrigation
plan should be submitted addressing
1)
A revision in the shape of the planting areas adjacent
to the retail pad at the corner.
2)
The provision of street trees with a planting detail
per the street tree planting a�tachedstandards
for your hreview land
Works Department. A copy
3) A revision in the proposed groundcover shown for
pockets in the parking area from gazanias to a plant
material that is approved by the Planning Director.
CITY OF CAMPBELL
Mr. Deke Hunter
RE: 1650-1800 S. Bascom Avenue
November 15, 1990
Page Two
Lighting Details and Plan
1) Indication of a change in the decorative lighting along
the frontages of the building to a simpler lighting
design and
2) A provisional details to demonstrate the height and
shielding of lighting along the residential properties.
If you should have any questions regarding any of the above items,
please do not hesitate to contact the Planning Department at (408)
866-2140.
Sincerely
Tim J. Haley
Planner II
tjh:lb
c:m90-16
cc: Bill Hagman
The Hagman Group Architecture and Planning
1990 The Alameda
San Jose, CA 95126
Paul Reid
Reid i Associates Landscape Architect
10055 Miller Avenue, Ste. 101
Cupertino, CA 95014
Michelle Quinney, Public Works Department
Attachments:
1) Street Tree Planting Detail
2) Conditions of Approval
NOTES (unless otherwise specified(
1, All trios shot' be 15-gollon size and of the variety indicated Oh the plops
ar specified by the City Engineer.
Z. The location of each Tree shou the City Engineer and
be delermined by
marked in the treed prior to planting
Punting holes shop "bo at least 2 in diomttef and loosened to o depth
of not teas than 30.basin
♦ perforated A.B•S* pip, shall be inst talled in each watering ts.
A 4" s 30"
and copped by o drain grate with '" between slots.
to facilitate deep watering
5 Vertically cut the foot ball at three or lour lilac
discourage to 100"M ,bait and
discourage circling. When planting, hold tre* so
6.
shot previous ptor.tinq '"of
is even with sidewal'arlevel �
J ` ut
I s v 'hegraroot all- lop
r � v the root halt.
apDfaved imported foil
.1
Use
where notiee mettrial is
unsuitable for plant ins.
thW rlt-e„Ill 110.
Tie in ,hood
& When hole is
comps ct the
•
lip wilh WOW packets.
foil and eliminolt air potters.
w
paive.aawy$"a
2' ■ 2" sleta
9. Fill I.lone ing h l with loose
to g
(least ,h a•
n•at+dt
Tie .Im evo ,brad
soil
basin around
,.boar lies.
10. Construct a watering
each Ire* as shown.
11. Plor.d on approved 14nq-kstins
in each tree wet.
f.eiliier tablet
with one CIL C
Pr•r10Ya pl•nling
I? S,rpparl each fret
ftatf of 14061.
�1 a 30" perlo
level
r:IfW ftdwoad
slake thou ddend into the Wound
drei
•.f1.S pipe andtrfl^
hh * s•te(e•
watering ba•In
(opting
p011 thf bOltOm OI IM with
gist. wit
skis.
"lde.alb
hole. Tit tied to flats
h*s or equal.
Curb end tor
a=
approved rubodr
°�;``1r
13. planting op otions must befollWdd
el of
It, ��
qr`•
by a deep. thorough .otefrns
,\ 0
1p OFn�ifMy1� (Mel bell
each life.
14. Substitution" in h!d .Ofifhlf are
1
permitted Only upon .path outhori-
Engineer.
2d" wla.
t
notion "am roe City
yEg I'dy
STREET TREE PLANTING wool
AT : j,�a5
CITY OF
is
CAMPBELL _
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL FOR M 90-16
SITE ADDRESS: 1650-1800 SOUTH BASCOM AVENUE
APPLICANT: DF.KE HUNTER
PC NTG: 11/13/90
1. The presented Landscape Plans propose a reasonable concept of
landscaping and irrigation for this project which will result in an
attractive shopping center.
2. The Site Plans with the addition of a pedestrian walkway and the
relocation of the trash enclosure satisfy Condition No. 1 of
Resolution No. 2674.
♦ • f
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR FILE NO. N 90-16
SITE ADDRESS: 1650-1800 SOUTH BASCOM AVENUE
APPLICANT: DEKE HUNTER
P.C. MTG. DATE: 11/13/90
The applicant is hereby notified, a■ part of this application, that
he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with
the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of
California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she
is required to comply with all applicable Codes and Ordinances of the
City of Campbell and the State of California, which pertain to this
development and are not herein specified.
Applicant to submit revised plans for approval of the Planning Director
addressing the following concerns:
1. Modification and/or additions to the Landscape and Irrigation Plan
indicating revised shapes of planting areas, tree planting details,
and revisions to some plant materials.
2. Submittal of lighting details shall demonstrate shielding of light
fixtures along the residential properties, and
3. Modifications to the Site Plan showing an acceptable pedestrian
walkway and relocation of the trash enclosure.
• a
I?'EM NO. 4
STAFF REPORT FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 13, 1990
M 90-16 Consider the application of Mr. Doke Hunter for
(S 90-01) approval of the landscape, lighting and pedestrian plan
Hunter, D. for a previously approved Site and Architectural
application allowing the remodel of the Hamilton Plaza
Shopping Center, on property located at 1650-1800 South
Bascom Avenue, in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning
District.
That the Planning Commission take the following action:
AppfmVE the landscaping, irrigation and lighting plan for the
above referenced project, subject to the attached condition.
This project was previously assessed under S 90-01 and the Planning
Commission adopted a Negative Declaration, hence, no additional
environmental action is necessary.
bppyjCAMT`S PA0ffiS�L
The applicant has submitted landscape, irrigation, lighting and
project details for the review of the Planning Commission as
required by the Conditions of Approval.
2674 on April 24,
TheePP�lanning commissionldopted Resolution remodel the Hamilton
1990, approving the appproposal
Plaza Shopping Center and to construct a retail expansion for three
portions of the shopping center. Condition Nos. 1 and l of the
Plannina Commission's approval required that the applicant submit
plans for the Commission's approval. Condition No. 1, required the
submittal of a revised Site Plan addressing the following concerns:
a. The provision of alternative street improvements along the
frontage of the property providing bus duckouts, deceleration
lanes and a landscape concept along the street frontages.
b. The provision of soundwalls along the perimeter of the property
were it abuts adjacent residential uses.
C. The provision of a landscape plan providing detail of the
pedestrian walkways adjacent to the building and a pedestrian
walkway from Robway Avenue to the project.
d. The provision of screening for trash enclosures for approval of
the Planning Director.
Condition No. 7 required the submittal of a landscape and lighting
plan for approval by the Planning Commission.
_
Staff Repert M 90-16 2_ November 13, 1990
ns
A copy of the Planning Commission
Resed olution
pril 24and9the conarecattached
expressed ir. the Staff Repo
for the Commission's review.
RLSM§MLAN :
The Site Plan has addressed the concerns as expressed s: the Staff
Report of April 24, 1990, with the following exceptions:
The provision of an acceptable pedestrian walkwayfrom
the
Z southerly
Bascom Avenue bus duckout into the center along
driveway entrance, and
cloure
2. The provision padon t.heacornerpofble BascomsandnHamiltontservice the
AvenuesC
retail
iti c aPZNC •wD IRRIGATION PLANS:
The submitted
leand andscapec nceptron ofsalsoddedPlans
treewould
lineprovide
boulevard
satisfactory accented with
treatment
talong
the
nt astreet
nd identifiedgwith d25vfoot palm sa
tree&; and, an
Bomnite
acceptable landscape treatment for the remainder of the parking
areas.
rIrHTING PLAN:
licant has provided lighting details for the upgraded parking
Tha app features:
area which include the following
1. Refurbished light standards
2. Provision of up lights in landscape areas, and
3. Provision of decorative pedestrian lights.
----_-.-.+..+oil xvZEM CaiffiTPBH
c ittee is recommending approval
The Site and Architectural Review Comm
aof
ndttha lntroductnonwofhaapedestrianslight jwalkway in the landscape areas
vnME AWa0z
The Landscape Advisor has reviewed this o�dalcwithand
somerminorion
change
Plan for this project and recommends app
in plant materials in the parking area
tntehaslincreased the rnumber
n
the number of street trees. The app
indicated Tees and the the plant material changes are incorporated
a a
_3_ November 13, 1990
Staff Report M 90-16
armmuvY OY S'�'A-� B
is r
Staff ecommending approval of the plans, as submitted, withthe
following modifications or additions which would require approval
the Planning Director:
1. site Plan: Applicant to submit revised Site Plan providing an
acceptable pedestrian walkway along the southerly driveway and
to padronotheecornerthe rofhBascomsure and Hamilton Avenues.
servicing the retail
Avenues
2. Landscape and Irrigation Plan: Applicant to revise Landscape
and Irrigation Plans to provide a linear landscape area along
the Bascom Avenue frontage of the new retail pad. Tree
planting along the
strofttheontage shall
confor to the street
tree planting details
3. Lighting Plan: Applicant to revise the proposed decorative
pedestrian lights along the buildinglfrontage to demonstrate
a more
contemporary, simpler don
esig �hea�erimeter of the project so that
.hielding of lights al
buiiding and parking lot lighting does not adversely affect
adjacent residential uses. The height
elanninand
Ddesignr f perimeter
11.ghting will be reviewed by
Redlined plans will be presented to the Planning Commission at its
meeting.
arranhments:
1. Findings
2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2674
3. Site Plan
4. Staff Report of April 24, 1990
Submitted by: J
Tim J. Haley, Planner II
Approved by:
Steve Piasecki, Planning Director
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL FOR M 90-16
SITE ADDRESS: 1650-1800 SOUTH BASCOM AVENUE
APPLICANT: DEKE HUNTER
PC MTG: 11/13/90
1. The presented Landscape Plans propose a reasonable concept of
landscaping and irrigation for this project which will result in an
attracti-s shopping center.
2. The Site Plans with the addition of a pedestrian walkway and the
relocation of the trash enclosure satisfy Condition No. 1 of
Resolution No. 2674.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR FILE NO. M 90-16
SITE ADDRESS: 1650-1800 SOUTH BASCOM AVENUE
APPLICANT: DEKE HUNTER
P.C. MTG. DATE: 11/13/90
The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that
he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with
the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of
California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she
is required to comply with all applicable Ccdes and Ordinances of the
City of Campbell and the State of California, which pertain t% this
development and are not herein specified.
Applicant to submit revised plans for approval of the Planning Director
addressing the following concerns:
1. Modification and/or additions to the Landscape and Irrigation Plan
indicating revised shapes of planting areas, tree planting details,
and revisions to some plant materials.
2. Submittal of lighting details shall demonstrate sh'elding of light
fixtures along the residential properties, and
3. Modifications to the Site Plan showing an acceptable pedestrian
walkway and relocation of the trash enclosure.
MEMORANDUM _ CITY OF CAMPBELL
To: Tim J. Haley Date: October 25, 1990
Planner II,,tt
From: Michelle Quinn"y !A
Associate Civil Engineer
Subject U"r'SCAPE PLAN 1800 S. BASCOM
-----------------------------------------------------------
In response to your memo of 10-12-90, I submit the fnllowing
comments in regards to the above Landscape Plan.
1. Sheet L-J: Does not show right turn duck -out.
2. Sheet L-4: The limits of that portion "not in contract"
are not clear.
S. Shee- L-5: Does not show right turn duck -out. Recommend
60 ft. spacing on street trees.
4. Sheet L-?: The :ree planting detail should be The City
standard, at least for the street trees.
f:lscp-pin
Flue -
CITY OF Cp,MpeELL
MEMORANDUM
October 12, 1990
Michael Quinney
Date
To: Associate Engineer
Tim J. Haley
"'.M planner II File No. S 1650
- 1800 S. Bascom
Landscape Plan
90-n1 -
ation plan for the
ect. The review of the plan has been scheduled
Please find attached a landscape and rofNovember 13, 1990.
above -referenced Commission meeting
for the Planning this project would be
Your comments and suggestions regarding
appreciated by:
October 31 1990-
ease call me at 866-2144.
f you should have any Questions, pl
I
Thanks.
c:ks/990-01/pg•38
f
CITY OF CAMPBELL
MEMORANDUM
SUSAN LANDRY Oat* October 11,1990
To: LANDSCAPE ADVISOR
TIN J. HALEY
From: PLANNER II
LANDSCAPE PLAN FILE NO. S 90-01
SubMcc: 1650-1800 S. Bascom A- e.
Please find attached a landscape and irrigation plan for the above -referenced
project. The review of the plan has been scheduled for the Site and
Architectural Review Committee meeting of October DAT1E990
Your comments and suggestions regarding this project would be appreciated
by: _October 16,1990
DATE
If you should have any questions, please call me at (408) 866-2144. Thanks.
COMMENTS:
b:advisorrfls/pg.l
-- i
rRy OF CAMPBEIL
7 0 N O R T H F I R S T S T R E E T
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008
( 4 0 8 ) 866-2100
FAX • (408) 379-2572
October 10, 1990
Planning
D"nmeM:
Sierra Precast
P.O. Box 53C2A0 y515]
San Jos-,
Attn: Linda
RE: Proposed Precast wall
1640 S. Bascom Avenue
Dear Linda:
Please be advised that the Planning Department has reviewed your
n six foot and eight
request for permits to allow the con
struct io
foot precast wall along the perimeter of the above referenced shopping
center. proposal subject
The Planning Director has conditionally approve3 this
to the following conditions:
1) Applicant to secure any necessary building permits.
2) lump stone pattern, light grey art
Precast wall to be a sDepartment
A color sample should be provided to the Planning Dep
prior to construction of the fencing.
ck
on
3) The proposed fencing shall include both cap a rowloas indicated
t.,p of the fence as well as a pillar
on your submittal.
AL
CITY OF CAMPBELL
Sierra Precast
RE: Proposed Precast Wall
October 10, 1990
Page Two
4) The proposed fencing shall be stepped down at the Hamilton
Avenue frontage to 3 feet and adjacent to the Robway
pedestrian entrance to 6 feet, adjacent to the proposed
trellis structure. The proposed trellis structure is not
accurately shown in terms of location on the submitted
landscape plan. The proposed trellis structure will have to
be relocated to align with the Robway entrance as well as to
provide for handicap access to the center.
If hesitate ou should have any questions regarding this decision, please do not
itate to c nt ct the Planning Department at 866-2140
Sincerely,
Tim J. Haley
Planner II
tjh:lb
c:m90-16
cc: Doke Hunter Bill Hagman
Hunter Properties The Hagmai. Group
20725 Valley Green Dr, Ste. 100 1990
San JoaeA a eda
95126
Cupertino, CA )5014
Building Division
CITY OF CAMPBELL ROUTE SHEET
PROJECT ADDRESS: �C ? 7 -�' zTe DATE: "T
Applicant must contact departments and provide additional information
marked 'X' below. Approvals will be granted by each city department
through interoffice mail on separate forms.
Required Approved
WEST VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT:
jjj 100 E. Sunnyoaks Ave, Campbell, U 95008. 408/378-2407
Supply one (1) set of plans for Industrial and Department developments.
Return yellow copy of newer permit to Building Department.
0 It -i PLANNING DEPARTMENT:
70 N.rp First St., Campbell, CA 95008. 408/866-2140
pp
Su 1 lot plan, elevation and floor plan.
FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE:
—' 123 Union Ave. Campbell, U 95008. 400/866-2189
Supply one (1) sat of complete building plans.
_ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT:
70 N. First St. Campbell, CA 95008. 408/866-2150
Supply five sets of off -site Improvement plena and excavation permit application.
NOTICE: Pursuant to Chapter 11.32 of the Campbell Municipal Code, any dirt or
debris Sena raced •t a construction site that Is allowed to repair, on a public
right of way for more than twelve (12) hours way be removed by the city AT THE
EXPENSE Oi THE APPLI UNT FOR THIS BUILDING PERMIT. FAILURE TO PAY THE EXPENSE
t ILL RESU:.T IN SUSPENSION OF FURTHER BUILDING INSPECTIONS.
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES: Steve Brooks, 408/299-6060.
2220 Moorpark Ave, Son Jose, U 9512B
Supply two (2) seta of complete building plans.
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL: Clifford R. Young, 406/945-5300.
700 - Estero. Rd, San Jose, U 95134
CAMPBELL UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT Janeen Cassidy, 408/378-3405
155 N. Third St, Campbell, U 95008
CAMBRIAN SCHOOL DISTRICT: C.B. Towner, 408/377-2103
4115 Jacksoi Dr, San Jose, U 95124.
REgUIRED RECEIVED
ENERGY FORMS
HANDICAPPED FORMS
SOILS REPORT
ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS
PLAN CHECK FEE
SOUND TRANSMISSION CONTROL
DRAINAGE PLAN
OTHER
Ask
•
�h� ✓l�'
��1SJq�
CITY OF QAMPBELL APPI)rA7I0N FOR BUILDIN zPERMIT
Date
SKIP��..5�
Telephone _
Aoolic ant s Name
A licant's Address
Construction Lender's Name �—
BUILDING PERK:: IAFORWTION
TO BE COMPLE1ED BY THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT
Building Address
1=
1 V� � 69" P S
Owner (
Telephcne
Lj-
��,
License
Contractor's Name
�. �o �E
PG � � SAO
Address
F'f 6G ��_
State
License No._
Architect or Engineer
Address_
Energy Calcs. _
APN Planning Pept. No.
Fire
Sprinklered
Group? Type
Units_
Commercial
Units
No. of B1dgs.�Residentlaa
-a
I.I/Jt
,fr
p)^�L��T
�CR^F7.
Description of Work
-r Valuation (a) $ i
Square Feet (a) O VJ
1 40
Square Feet
Other
Valuation (b) $
1 `L4
Total Valuation f 6
,, S�j Dace Receipt No.
Adv: n:e Fee Paid f }
SS 7.0 Total Building Permit Fee 4
Building Permit Fees_
Balance Due s
Construction Tax
No. Sets of Signed Plans
—Eng. Ca lc s. -�-4�' �? _Logged
Condirions or Remarks
di41J,i6dPd 9-/1-io bN ;?n j Ciw
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 11, 1990
SUBJECT: BASCOM AVENUE AND HAMILTON AVENUE SHOPPING CENTER
1. On the phase II site plan which accompanied Resolutions No. 2671 and
2674, a New Retail Facility (7800 sf) is shown.
Is this the current storage area of Pay 8 Pak? Or,
Is it a new structure for a retail facility?
2. With reference to the proposed relocation of the retail pad formerly
to the south of Pay 6 Pak, to a position adjacent to the aforementioned
retail facility we have no serious objection. We do see advantages
when we consider its new location.
The Robway Avenue exit to the shopping center can now be moved
to the Robway sidewalk (southside).
There other concerns:
In Resolution No. 2671 (Apr24/90) an 8 foot Noise Attenuation Wall
was addressed.
In Resolution ";o. 2674 (Jun 12/90) the 3 foot Ncise Attenuation
Wall was reduced to 6 feet. Why was this done? Such a wall
is intended to reduce noise polution that impact on the community.
Delivery vehicles with radios blasting, noise common to retail
businesses ( e.g. movement of new stock, ampli ving systems wi(ith
period"
anmuncements and the like) would certainq justify the
8 foot wall concept. A 6 foot wall in this environment has
very littly value in the reduction of noise pollution.
Stop Signs and Crosswalks should be posted at sites where pedes-
trians must cross traffic lanes, such as at Robway exit and
other sections of the center where foot traffic must compete
with vehicular traffic
FINALLY, The vehicular traffic on Campisi Way to the service
roal in the rear of the retail areas of the shopping center.
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING SEPTEMBER 11, 1990
BASCOM AVENUE AND HAMILT7N AVFNUE SHOPPING CENTER page -2
The vehicular routs (Campisi/Robway) to the service
road on the east side of the shopping center is shown
to have two (?) 90 degree turns before it makes a third
90 degree turn to the service road.
You're asking large tractor trailers and large vehicles to
make two sharp turns before reaching the service road and
then making a third sharp turn on to the service road.
Consideration must be giver; to the number of large tractor
trailers and vehicles that must negotiate this route to
make their deliveries.
With the proposed parking shown on the site plan, this is
a serious condition -- ACCIDENTS WAITING TO HAPPEN.
RAYMOND CLARK
125 APNIL WAY
CAMPSELL CA 06M
0 a
Planning Commission Minutes
September 11, 1990
page 1 of 4
3. M 90-16 public Hearing to consider the application of Mr.
(S 90-01) Deke Hunter for approval of a modification to a
Hunter, D. retail previously
foorroved project propertf kntownaasow the 1relocation of a
6 0-1800 South
Bascom Avenue, in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Boning
District. APN: 288-11-001, 002, 003, 004, and 005.
Chairperson Perrin read the Application into the record.
An aerial map and architectural renderings were on display.
Steve Piasecki, Director of Planning, presented the Staff Report and
reviewed the modifications to the previously approved application. He
reviewed communication received by the Planning Department opposing this
project.
The Staff's recommendation for approval was based upon the following:
- building alignment
- building located further from the residential areas
- blends better with the shopping center
- smaller retail facility
- staff's recommendation for an 8 foot wall on the southerly
portion of the shopping center.
Commissioner Meyer reported on the Site and Architectural Review
Committee's discussions, noting that the Committee felt that the
proposed design was more beneficial to the surrounding neighborhood and
recommended approval.
The Chairperson declared the Public Hearing on open.
A22lirant'S Co nAa: of the
Mr. Doke Hunter addressed the Commission requesting approval
subject application noting that the previously approved modifications
were studied after consideration of concerns raised by the neighbors
relating to having the retail center abutting the residential area. The
requested modification, he stated, will not impact the neighborhood as
t noise
related,to air�conditionerswill
and trash enclosures r�iowillebring the
building together in a more complementary fachion.
commissioner Alne raised questions initiated by neighbors who wrote the
communications e nnootvapp=oacheeddthi sand he has not seen the letters. the
• a
Planning Commission Minutes
September 11, 1990
page 2 of 4
Mr. Piasecki provided copies of the letters to Mz. Hunter who reviewed
is
then. After review, Mrnce. f the cant",nter noted hsincetthese at 1ptternletter
enawasfrom the
relating to saint
canter.
person hired to maintain the shopping
Further, be stated that the chopping center will be manag��nda more
ents wil]
professional manner. that all concerns brought forward by
be addressed, and, he requested that the city inform him of any
complaints received so that they may be dealt with in a timely manner.
Commissioner Alne asked if the traffic would increase along the property
line and Mr. Hunter stated that the traffic would increase. However,
the building
vibrations, o seffromoot air
conditions and trash enclosures
will
KRa c. Ray Clark, 325 April Way, distributed his comments to the Commission
Commission, as follows:
and summarised Uren to the
asked if the new retail space would be for storage or retail
use.
- suggested that Robway Avenue exit be relocated to include the
sidewalk.
askeA why the soundwalls were reduced in size from the
original. approval
- suggested placement of atop sigius and crosswalks at sites
where pedestrians must cross traffic lanes ee turns that
- expressed concern relating to the three e 90 degrucks and tractor
would have to be made by large
tra i ).;:rz;
The Cm vission was .upportive of relocating the sidewalk on RobwaY
Avenue..
In responso Lo noncerns relating to whether the space would be used for
storage, staff stated that the new space would be for retail use during
Phase II of th,, project.
Mr. Rick Ferguson, lo9'1 Ridgeley Drive, addressed the Commission
r
requesting that the soundwalls be raised to 12 feet, since the source of
the noise comes from a higher point.
M/S: Fox, klne MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS UNANIMOUSLY
APPROVED.
• s
planning Commission Minutes
September 11, 1990
page 3 of 4
Commission DiscussiOD:
Commissioner Alm asked staff if they had any recommendations regarding
the height of the soundwall along the south and east bourn -.-ties.
Director Piasecki stated that staff has recommended an 8 foot wall along
the southern portion of the project. He stated that the planning staff
considers a 12 foot soundwall an excessive height.
ld
commissioner Mr.Alne asked if & Piaseckii statedten foot that thescommission undwall ocan unreasonable.
tethe in
response,
height of the soundwall.
Further, Commissioner Alm suggested Mr. Clark's statement regarding
location of the sidewalk on Robway seemed to be more appropriate than
what was submitted.
Director Piaseeki was supportive of the suggestion and rLdlined the site
plan to include this.
Commissioner Alne continued, that recommenc.,tions regarding placement of
stop signs and crosswalks at sites where pedestrians cross traffic lanes
was also a reasonable request. Mr. Piasecki stated that it was and
would be included in the Conditions of Approval.
In response to questions raised by Mr. Clark relating to the 90 degree
turns required by delivery trucks, Mr. Bill Helms, Traffic Engineer,
stated that he is satisfied that the trucks will be able to maneuver
safely.
Commissioner Alm moved to adopt Resolution No. 2697, approving M 90-16
amended to include relocation of sidewalks on Robway, placement of stop
signs and crosswalks at sites where pedestrians must cross traffic
lanes, and that the soundwalls be raised to ten feet along the southern
property line.
Commissioner Fox stated that he would second the motion if the soundwall
was 8 feet in height. Commissioner Alne was agreeable to the 8 foot
amendment.
MIS: ALNE, FOX MOTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2697, APPROVING
M 90-16, AS REDLINED TO RELOCATING THE SIDEWALKS
ON ROBWAY; PLACING STOP SIGNS AND CROSSWALKS AT
SITES WHERE PEDESTRIANS CROSS TRAFFIC LANES; AND,
THAT THE SOUNDWALLS BE RAISED TO EIGHT FEET.
planning Commission Minutes
September 11, 1990
page 4 of 4
C�issioner Christ vas opposed to the notion due to site circulation.
t the circulation vas poor, however, he
Cossissioner pox agrtied that of the piilding pad. since it aligned batter
supported the proposed its to residential areas -
with the center and utigated noise impa
Co'issionsr Nilkinson was supportive of the proposal -
Commissioner Al. thanked Mr-
Clark for his suggestions.
� a all Vote on��� Wilkinson, Perrine
AYES: commissioners. Fox, Alne, Meyer,
HOES: Commissioners: Christ
Hone.
ABSENT: Commissioners: * #
CITY VF CAMPBELL
7 0 N O R T H F I R S T S T R E E T
CAMPBELL, 0 A L I F 0 R N I A 9 500 8
(408) 866-2100
FAX R (408) 379-2572
Planning
Depanmem:
Deke Hunter
20725 Valley Green Drive
Suite 100
Cupertino, CA 95014
September 11, 1990
RE: N 90-16 - 1650 - 1880 South Bascom Avenue
Please be advised that the Planning Commission of the City of Campbell
has set the time of 7:31, p.m., or shortly thereafter, on Tuesday,
September 11, 1990, for consideration of the above -referenced
application. The meeting will b- held in the Council Chambers, Campbell
City Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California.
It is advisable that you, or an authorized representative, be present
f,:r this hearing.
If you have questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact the Planning Departnent at (408) 8C6-2140.
Sincerely,
Steve ?iasecki
Planning Director
0 •
ITEM No. 3
STAPF REPORT - PI.AMNINC• Coon SS MEETING OF SEPTSMBRR 11, 1990
public Hearing to consider the application of a
Deke Hunter for approval of a modification to a
M 90-16 ro act to allow the relocation of
(S 90-01) previously approved P Zoning
Hunter, retail pad for properties kGeneral Commercial)
Bascom Avenue, in a C-2-S
District.
e ..rrmmIDA I41� action:
nAff R-M-N Commission take the thelattached findings
"� That the Planningl Iop incorporating
1, ADOPT a RE'� ro act, subject to the Conditions of
approving This p j
Approval. 90-01, and the
reviously assessed under S hence no
*This project was p ted a Negative Declaration,
planning Commission adop
assessment action is necessary
additional environmental assess •
riHT'S P$4 Q the location of a The
royal to modify
the subject property.
" The applicant se'e approval
of Bascom and
previously approved retail building
project will be situated on the south east corner
Hamilton Avenues.
vnnU Area: 12.4 acres
parcel phas Ilft-
e 154,120 sq.
146,520 sq. ft. 30
Grose Floor Area: 28 30%
Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 28%
Building Coverage'
Floors: 1 story
Height: 55 ft.
PAS �1:350) autoll 712 (1:207) 750
Pr:vided: (1:19b) 725 (1:350) 725
(1-.350)
MS'planning Commission has previously adopted Resolution NOB-
,and
and 2674 allowing the remodel and expansion of the Hamilton
Plaza Shopping Center.
The applicant's proposal ti to roupcOfE
one of the P P The applicant's proposal indicated a
ro osed buildings adjacent to the axis 1n
buildings in the center• ware footage of the new retail
he
ro osed square 250 square feet•
reduction r the 000 square feet to 11, park
space from
building from 15,
v the planning Commission.
revised plan indicates the reduction o on
that previously approved b,
a
Staff Report -2- September 11, 1990
M 90-16
GffiiffitaT PL�►T AITD ZONING CONSISTENCY
A. General Plan Designation: The site is designated for a
commercial land use on the City's General Plan. The proposal
is consistent with this General Plan designation.
B. Zoning Designation: The site is zoned for C-2-S (General
Commercial). The proposal use of the site is consistent with
this zoning designation.
nn[�TRe�r DESCRIPTION
A. Attached for the Commission's review is the previous site
plan approved by the Commission and the revised site plan as
submitted for this request. The revised site plan indicate:a
a smaller retail building than previously approved and a
slight reduction in the parking from 726 stalls to 725.
DISCUSSION
Site Plan: The revised site plan indicates the movement of the
retail pad from the south east corner of the project site to a pad
area adjacent to the existing outside storage area of Pay-N-Pak
Hardware Store. This modification would change the driveway
location to the perimeter of the project and would allow parking
along the southern property line.
Setbacks: The propcsed relocation of the building would increase
the setback of the proposed retail building from the adjacent
residential uses.
Scr mina Wall and Buffer: The revised plan indicates a reduction
in the soundwall along the: perimeter of the property from 8 feet
to 6 feet, and the provision of a 6 foot planting area along the
southerly property line. Staff is recommending minor changes in
the perimeter landscape area to increase the buffer to adjacent
residential uses. This change is redlined on the presented
plans.
parking* The revised site plan indicates an improved parking
ratio and parking count for the project in relationship to the
proposed retail and auto service uses.
1RCFIITECTURAI. ADVISOR S COlU'D2M
The Architectural Advisor finds the revised plans acceptable and
comments that the new building location will inccrporate this use
into the shopping center better.
0 •
Staff Report -3- September 11, 1990
M 90-16
mY
Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission approve the
applicant's request for a modification in that it provides a
reasonable site deve'_ pment alternative which improves the parking
ratios in the center; provides an adequate buffer to surrounding
uses; and, provides a more workable location fcr the building from
a pedestrian circulation standpcint.
A a ments:
1. Findings
2. Recommended Conditions
3. Exhibits
4. Previous Planning Commission Resolution Nos. 2671 and 2674
5. Location Map
Submitted by:
Ti He ey, Planner II
Approved by: ;Y
Planning Di,ector
• a
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL FOR M 90-16
SITE ADDRESS: 1650-1800 SOUTH BASCOM AVENUE
APPLICANT: DEFE HUNTER
PC MTG: 9/11/90
1. The proposed project modifications would allow a similar project
to that approved by the Planning Commission at its Jane 12, 1990,
meeting.
2. The revised proposal presents a less intensive project from a
square footage and parking standpoint than that previously
approved by the Planning Commission.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR FILE NO. M 90-16
SITE ADDRESS: 1650-1800 SOUTH BASCOM AVENUE
APPLICANT: DEKE HUNTER
P.C. NTG. DATE: 9/11/90
The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that
he/she is required to meet the fcllowing conditions in accordance with
the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of fhe State of
California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby 1— ied that he/she
is required to comply with all applicable Codes and Ordinances of the
City of Campbell and the State of California, which pertain to this
development and are not herein specified.
1. Ali conditions of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2674 are
incorporated as a part of this approval.
Fire Department
2. Provide allowable area study to determine lot line impact. (UBC
506).
3. The Liquor Barn truck parking area of the truck dock Shall not
obstruct the minimum 20 foot wide access road extending between
the loading dock ai.d parking ;;paces at east property line. (UFC
10.207).
4. Install one fire hydrant providing 150o gpm fire flow at the south
east area of the project. (UFC 10.207).
5. Rear service drive shall be posted as a Fire Lane. (UFC 30.207).
6. All remodelled portions of existing structures and all new
structure exceeding 5,000 square feet shall be protected
throughout by an automatic fire sprinkler system. (UFC 10.308).
Building Division
7. Provide a code analysi.F for area increase.
g, Provide additional hanalcapped parking and signage as needed.
• • e
ITEM NO. 3
M 90-16
Planning Commission S-pt. 7, 1990
City of Campbell
70 North First St.
Campbell, Ca. 95008
Subject: Opposition to modification of previously approved
project, file M 90-16 (M 90-11 and S 90-01)
Addres3: 1650-1880 South Bascom Ave.
Dear commisioners:
I reside at 1085 Ridgeley Dr. in the rear house. The house is
approxiamately forty feet from the south eastern boundary.
This is labeled "Open Space" on both Plan 1 and on the modification
labeled Exhibit B. Our house is next door to Mr. R. Ferguson's
backyard at 1097 Ridgeley Dr.
In the two years of my residence, I have put up with Semi's
running their refrigerator trucks all nits long. This literally
vibrates my house. Not to mention the parking lot sweeping
between 12:OOam and 2:OOam every morning. The delivery trucks
hurling their louvered rolling doors, the trash trucks banging
the bins to knock the garbage loose, the air wrenches at Goodyear,
the homeless, etc.
At first, Iwas disappointed to find out that I would lose access
to the reargate, but the thought of some peace and quiet alleviated
the inconvenience. I understand the original plan called for
an eight foot sound wall. Considering the height of the delivery
trucks and Semis, this seems rather inadequate. The sound wall
on Exhibit B now is marked for a six foot sound wall.
I have always believed that the city of Campbell was interested
in maintaining and even improving the quality of life here.
The pedestrian signal -crosswalk on Bascom just north of Campbell
Ave., the subtle but tasteful developement behind Bascom and
Hwy 17 Hamilton exit. The moving and preservation of the historic
Ainsley House are ust a few examples.
In closing, I would respectfully request that the plan for the
additional developement at 1650-1080 Bascom Ave., be given
further study and consideration. It appears that the developer
is decreasing the costs of the project and increasing potential
revenue by increasing the new retail space, without any consideration
to the adjoining residences, referred to as "Open Space".
Respectful(/ly,-�f]/I91lA,NI �71
M 'hale auiphy'
1065 Ridgeley Dr. Rear
Campbell, Ca. 95008 SEP-11
01-rY OF UAMt-UCLL
PLANNINO D['AeTM[NT
` _.e SP60 VS6 80r PM 0357 OE:ET 06. L0 d35
- ITEM NO. 3
1650-1800 S. Bascom Ave.
planning Com:aission vE:N
City of Campbell
70 North First Street CITY
Campbell, Ca. 95001t: c,rvw,N., r
subject: Opposition to modification of previously approved
proJect, file M 90-16 (M 90-I1 and S 90 01)
Address: 1650 1RRO South Bascom Ave.
Dear commissioners,
I live In a single family residence that adjoins tht• parcel
slated for development. My property is In an area marked on
the sit.• plans for Ibis proJect as "OPEN SPACL•'" on INe right
end of .he drawing. There are six residences on four parcels
sharing that southern boundary, mine Is nearest the corner of
the protect parcel.
Thee original plan Called for siting the building pad as close
to this southeast corner as eight feet. it also called for a
^ound wall with a height of eight feet. My feeling about that
plan was that although the four parcels on the Southern
property line (including mine) would lose access from the
North, at least it would be quiet due to the lack of any
activity between .he building and the property line.
Relocating the proposed building would +reate In essence a
street lined with parking spaces directly behind my property.
This would reduce the distance between my back door and the
truck traffic that serves the shopping center to about one
third of what it currently is. I am already gt.'te aware of
the traffic and I certainly do not want it any closer.
Reduction of the sound wall height to six feet is a step in
the wrong direction. It would make sense to raiselhe height
of the wall to match the height of the source. The tallest
source being trucks that are thirteen feet high and typically
have exhaust pipes and air horns at about the ten foot level.
Why do I mention air horns' Because truck drivers frustrated
by a blocked alli•y or an unanswered door do use them, signs ur
no signs. For years I have been hearing the LIPS trucks and
others beeping their horns as they approach the corner that
they turn next t� it.. pay N Pak and this latest plan proposes
two more corners fur them In negotiate and they would be a
whole lot closer to those of us who reside In th+• "OPFN
SPACE" and the southeast corner.
For years developers of residential property along
freeways in our valley have been required to Install Ineffec'
-
live sound walls that are now heing r.•placed by sound wall.
that are ten to thirteen feet tall. Why Just put up halt :+
,ound wall, make it effeetive and make It at least twelve feet
tall, ur glee us vehicular access to the trarfi+ that we are
going to be subJi-ted !o.
p.,de 1
Am
r ocrss .e undrr gr oundIng
bell has endured the p r_;ult.; are Impressive, 1
nnwnt Own Camp „•rv,• 1 t and t h'. r -
incIO,jc areas like
the utilities II"' poles and
hope that you will extend the clean 11Ok over
ours. cpeciticully, there f.; a liar th-,:south end East
lines of the shnpping center, thts would seem to be
transformers that runs the length of this eyesore.
property removal
the ideal time to require the
At present the only vegrtalion elnng most of nut
South and
amount:; to weed:; and walnut Imes+obi hand
power p
Fast property line. , the posslbllltY for
being undesirable. The removal of the tin'• o P` shield
the wires strung on them would "I"" "l
vc• elalton Thal would help
planting trees and other K v1Ae a nice green perimeter
us from the shopping center and pro
for the completed protect• anced by the complc
i would hope to see this teighborblfdthehdeveloper Is allowed
flan of this
shopping center,
his
f this nelghhorhooI will be compromised
variances and short-cuts based on the financial Impact
ro do the
budget. the quality o
forever. It this dev
eloper
doesn't have the budge not wall
protect in a way that would benefit the area then why
for one Ihat does?
Sincerely,
rk
Rick Ferguson
t097 RldgeleY Dr,
Campbell, Ca- 95008
APN 284-10-0`+0
CITY OF 1650-1800 S. BASCOM S-90-01 2/5
CAMPBELL
CITY OF CAMPBELL
7 0 N O R T H F i P S T S T R E E T
CAMPBELL. C A L I F 0 R N IA 95008
(408) 666.2100
FAX t ( 4 0 8 ) 3 7 9 - 2 5 7 2
Planning September 17, 1990
Depz,,mem:
Deke Hunter
20-25 Valley Green Drive
Suite 100
Cupertino, CA 95014
RE: M 90-16(S 90-01)
1650-1800 S. Bascom Avenue
Dear Deke:
Please be advised that the Planning Commission at its regular meeting
of September 11, 1990, adopted Resolution No. 2697, approving your
request for a modification to allow the relocation of a previously
subject properties. This approval is
approved retail building on the
subject to the conditions and the adopted resolution, and the plans as
red -lined. Please note that the Planning Commission required an 8 foot
masonry or pre -cast concrete wall along the southerly property line,
and that the pedestrian circulation on -site be reviewed at the same
time as the lighting r-d landscape plan is reviewed by the Planning
Commission.
if you should have any questions regarding the Planning Commission's
decision, please do not hesitate to contact the Planning Department at
(403) 866-2140.
Sincerely,
Tim J. Haley
Planner II
tjh:lb
c:M90-16
cc: Public Works Dept.
Building Dept.
Fire Dept.
Bill Hagman, Architect
CL
N NO. 2697
PLANNING LANN NGCOMMISSION
BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
ARCHITECTURAL
OF THE CITY OF TO A ppLVIOUSL)'c PPROVEDASITE ihTI AR MODIFICATION
APPLICATION ALLOWING THE RELOCATION OF ApROOpERTY LOCATED
AIL G
PAD TO AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER
AT 1650-1800 S0UTH BAS OMAACEZUS (GENERAL cHUt0TERCIAL)
FILE
288-11-1,2,3, APPLICATION OF MR.
ZONING DISTRICT•
NO. M 90-16.
to a
After notification an,-, public hearing as specified by law on the
Deke Hunter for approval to modificatiocluding
Site and Architectural Application,
application of Mr.
previously approved
tail
revised p Zoning District;
located at the r300 South Bascom Avenue (APN
lane and elevations to allow the relocation of a re
on property S General commercial) onents and
building Pad' S�55) in a C-2- ( Director, P p
288-11-1,2,3,4, by the Planning
and, after presentation a
opponents, the hearing was closed.
ideration Of
After due consall evidence presented, the Planning
ind as follows:
Commission did f
Commission at its June 12, 1990,
p,ie proposed project modifications would allow a similar project to
that approved by the planning
meeting- project from a square
ro osal present' a less intensivereviously approved by the
footage and p
2. The revised proposal
standpoint than that p
planning Commission. rant
Based on the above findings, the Planning Commission does hereby g
the requested development, subject to the attached conditions:
The approval is granted
1,. All conditions of Planning Commission desolution No. 2674 are
art I this Approval' 11 1990, and elevation
incorporated as a p plan,
dated July
based upon the revised1990e as redlined.
plan, dated August 1,
F„S__QepAr ment
UB
2, Provide llows�le aarea study to determine lot line impact.
5C6)
arking area of the truck dock ding
blnot
etween the
3 The LiMl' Barn truck P ro erty line. (UFC
obstru�-tthe dock minimum
9foot spacesdataeastspropd extending
loading
parkin
10.207) 1500 gpm fire flow at the south
Install one fire hydrant QrUFC10.207)•
g
east area of the project. (UFC 1
q,
a Fire Lane. (UFC 10.20'7)•
5, Rear service drive shall be posted as
Resolution NO. ?697 -2- September 11, 195J
M-90-16
page two
6. All remodelled portions of existing structures and all new structure
exceeding 5,000 square feet shall be protected throughout by an
automatic fire sprinkler system. (UFC 10.308).
Building Division
7. Provide a code analysis for area increase.
S. Provide additional handicapped parking and signage as needed.
Section 21.42.100 of the Campbell Municipal Code provides that any
approval granted under this Section shall expire one year after the date
upon which such approval was granted, unless an extension or
reinstatement is approved.
Approval is effective ten drys after decision of approval of the
Planning Commission, unless an appeal is filed.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of September 1990, by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Fox, Alne, Meyer, Wilkinson, Perrine
NOES: Commissioners: Christ
ABSENT: Commissioners: None
APPROVED: JAY R. PERRITfE
Chairperson
ATTEST: Steve Piasecki
Secretary
i
CITY Of CAMPBELL
7 0 N O R T H F I R S T S T R E E T
CAMPBELL, C, LIFORNIA 95008
(406) 866.2100
FAX • (408) 379-2572
Dapanmam:
Planning September 7, 1990
Hagstrom Properties
371 Village Square
Orinda, CA 94563
RE: M 90-16 - 1650 - 1800 South Bascom Avenue
Please be advised that the Planning Commission of the City of Campbell
has set the time of 7:30 p.m., or shortly thereafter, on Tuesday,
September 11, 1990, for consideration of the above -referenced
application. The meeting will be held in the Council Chambers, Campbell
City Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California.
It is advisable that you, or an authorized representative, be present
for this hearing.
If you have questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to
contact the Planning Department at (408) 866-2140.
Sincerely,
Steve Piasecki
Planning Director
)
_ A1011 1":R41 NO. 3
�( 90-16
Planning Commission Sept. 7, 1990
City of Campbell
70 North First St.
Campbell, Ca, 95008
Subject: Opposition tc, modification of previously approved
project, file M 90-16 (M 90-11 and S '0-01)
Address: 1650-i880 South Bascom Ave.
User Commisioners:
I reside at 1085 Ridgeley Dr. in the rear house. The house is
approxiamately forty feet from the south eastern boundary,
This is labeled "Open Space" on both Plan 1 and on the modification
labeled Exhibit B. Our house is next door to Mr. R. Ferguson's
backyard at 1097 Ridgeley Dr.
In the two years of my residence, I have put Lip with Semi's
running their refrigerator trucks all nits long. This literally
vibrates my house. Not to mention the parking lot sweeping
between 12:00am and 2:OOam every morning. The delivery trucks
hurling their louvered roiling doors, the Lrash trucks banging
the bins to knock the garbage loose, the air wrenches at GcodYear,
the homeless, etc.
At first, Iwas disappointed to find out that I would lose access
to the reargate, but the thought of some peace and quiet alleviated
the inconvenience. 1 understand the original plan called for
an eight foot sound wall. Considering the height of the delivery
trucks and Semis, this seems rather inadequate. The sound wall
on Exhibit B now is marked for a six foot sound wall.
I have always believed that the city of Campbell was interested
in maintaini:ig and even improving the quality of life here.
The pedestrian signal -crosswalk on Bascom just north of CAwpbell
Ave., the subtle but tasteful developement behind Bascom and
Hwy 17 Hamilton exit. The moving and preservation of the historic
Ainsley House are just a few examples.
In closing, I would respectfully request that the plan for the
additional developement at 1650-1880 Bascom Ave., be given
further study and consideration. Tt appears that the developer
is decreasing the costs of the project and increasing potential
revenue by increasing the new retail space, without any consideration
to the adjoining residences, referred to as "Open Space".
Respectfully,
M chele urphy ,
1085 Ridgeley Dr. Rear Campbell, Ca. 95008 SEP `� J
1 199U
CITY Lit- �. ;:,I-ucLL
PLANNING MPARTMENT
9b60 756 80b OH y353 OE:EI 06, 40 d35
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
,s+�ll �v�C ��Cl'C11�1� 1TC1�a
750 R!DDER PARK DRIVE
SAN JOSE. CALIFORNIA 95190
IN THE
R � r F PnnrF
cITY of cArfps_eiI AUG B11990
.....................
—�� STATE OF CAUFORNIA� CITY U
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA PLANNING, G'
City of Campbell
75 North Central Avenue
TamPbe] L. GA_..59AQ8_._.................. ................._................ ........._»__.....
NOTICE OF HEAFINGS _ No
TATE OF CALIFORNIA. s.
OUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
7'. arew W.,t b" M1a M' r'^'r� a0a... •r.1 wK ln.l « Y Iwr M1«•wn«1 Ila wal.e'iF]ru
3.0 r . a _ a w U* Ml,lr �� Y YE�IInM W w\•Y w MI'W� dwf a N. pilaw •rW
w• atlre pas.E.IpL a Y du M pa W .ne W1• oW n w
awr a w s«I .bw wa.r ni«.w • Ir.+o•vw 0—
a s«I .rw n way Wnlz a S". Ow..•I.rwr ^ r Ma w
>cwnnn •s «I IMn r YI.•o q SKI l000 •^a
Y Yn•. nwwn n•nlbrwe . r•..D•o.' a Q.rar« a vw .•clw, r prOrlwU b
•.na a « Ge+.�•r•^I Goa. a w sl.�. a mbar., wn..] no.e. a eer.. •e.
r ••Kr•rly. a bw > I.I.rr.ac r+.• .r.• IniY'V«K• d . Eer•rY W�!�Iw. N+.p
_v_ Irr a YI'1^Y ra].apr.. •ra • ra a wlK 10 IM Mx.w. w pulrira b IN w•MYnwnl a
ar161•. a . Pnowr .I.r ad.••IwW u•Y, Y.N. rw U Ow+wyr«on b w w.M•.wrwn .ne
dranY. Ir•er. YrIP. IKY w ewrarY•Ibr•: wl a .. 1na•
arlw•er a .wr I..bew a .cn a.rra a b w Yn ary a sM �o.. b w.b cw+r as s�.0
a Irw.o•o. n.. wwr YUYrw o�K .ro o•�+e b. a Iti roln:. Iw..b nbrbva. wl Yn
rprr .•wMl. b rv. Xra w ]•.r a.Yb'q Iti M1N p 1 _
as w.. ..1 w 1yY n.l .rr•4 1� �9 „ V."].rpb�«mt IN NO.� «tl cnx�wd w MI'�0.
tir rW bwV«.E •.K11Yr0
wl w nw•q a wlrn r •rw.K • . lar. a�uc coon. w•1 puwa.c w paeK
.a nw.K•ow a w 1•.earV Ylr lo.n.
..............................................................................
3Cth Au ust--
nu__.—__"_----_. M........__Ni 1]i•ab.OaV r iM ./cu..n._....»...9_, _......____..._.___.
f�1•d lw. - OIMw .r1E �Y a M W1 Jw. M«cvry 11...
C*-',)
city 01 e"V,4e11
NOTICE OF HEARINGS
Wffu
M «rw•a � .r..11w. ]r•Yr. w « 0r iw �n«ti ..w s...c r..m..^•�'ro b ma «
1 n•r �.• b m•l.. « wrK+•• a
mp« rnlw b .F.r•.a a • rreb.m
w..rwa, riwrK wwwl b Ye. «
wbr•.� a . •aa p•Ke b a•.w..• rrra
1•.plr! r.M �r.r. Mww b • G]S
rC Y GrwnCY i MM.a Y11
]e•rlmi. ro].om ow°:�m. wr r. r
ol• n• aww+ .r. a..•a+i �K
.•...E�•r• ewr.•ar �.nra.
b mr.b « A/arn a
E w�«b�r uw a rwaw a . Ilr
...• r w «m.w•M a. ra.b�w
a w »iE yam
�. 7
1 .14.. II..r•V b a.rrr M rE•wEe^ .1
w.w.l b Y } Ow�'�0�•Y�
alY.ar b T r•wq 0..� E w
Ernw.a� nr ••w� PP•. b w w.a...l
� n•r miaow « •w.wr. a
•bwr b wrna a • i g•
twlbp Irwn w.].S OD (nw.•1w110bfiw"rrw0"
Ow+IY •.•ww•Y b 0 Ob'.1Y>
tFw�+r n.•o. w. m•nrnm�a •
-"�: b•.m�baK w•n AP—
A——
(waly .Ls pMu.gbF•wn]
I.ozC EOOEI YN 1101M•1Y]e•1l� Fr
L.I w
pzo Er.•.m na Mlwi rbK b
M yi.ppla
b mr•br « OrHEaw
] *pc..a�ra..•zar c]+w�P wa. r.re
is{Fgw+Y+r �b.b..errr.be o..rr� b
rww•r am.n. l.wl.a 11] .Iww
5 eb M.w r wr'rwlc I�airr• w «
•o�a riroew Fr ro. zt •olo Ilrr
] naw ]••r•ot. uWwrr E,.
wp.m M Mw� wrw.. b s «.•a
WI• «w•Yw•. lya .••wb.a•. wblw aM
wpw�rwq apw.rr.•v, • m r F « A•.•.
Onc.. 10 bin Fni S.wl UrrP•a.4warw
nnwM.e.w.w• b.] wlwd wr.•.wro wr. •
n.«a Fl..r a Kwrn n,n n w m..wr. w
r"nor �w,Fb`�irnb m.�ie aMine � �
�www ro A. i.n a �a Fw+
or•mr,] m•r r Kerry b w�e�'wwq c
.url c corrls•la
. a c•r•rsu.
��n•aclll
r1Y
A
1.1 1 1 Ili 1' 1 N11,111 1 1
N O R T H F I R S T S T R E E T
7 0
CAMPBELL. CALIFORNIA 950�8
(4091 866.2100
FAX 0 14081 3-,9-2572 August 13, 1990
Planning
D,partmaM
NOTICE_OF j±EARM
AND PUBLIC REVIEW PERIOD
given that the Planning Commission of the City of
m or shortly thereafter, 01
Notice is hereby �0
Campbell has set the time of in3thP.m-,
City Hall Council Chambers,
Tuesday, September 11, 19901 Public hearing to
.-eet Ca„pbell, Califo�.nia, for P the revision to
NortF. First St application of Mr. Deke Hunter, allowing shopping
consider the app
the Building Pad Location for the remodel of an existing
center on property located at 1650-1800 South Bascom Avenue, 1n a C-2-S
(General Commercial) Zoning District, S 90-01 an
(General
288-11-0�1. 002, 003, 004, 005 and 056. File No.
hPN
(M90-15). ro ect and may
A Negative Declaration was Previously prepared fer this p
Department. Plans, elevations, legal
orting docume^.tation is on file in the
be reviewed at the Planning P ,^am bell, California.
descriptions, and/or other supp
Planning Department, 70 North First Street, - ''amp
bell,
persons may appeabe
r and be heard at this hearingject . Please
advised that if you challenge onlythe nthose issues youvorpsomeone lelse
court,
you may be limited to raising described in this Notice, or in written
Commission
raised at the public hearing Of Campbell Planning
corresp Questions
may be addressed to the
ond.�nce delivered to the City
3t or prior to, the public hearing.
planning Office at 866-2140.
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF CAMPBELL
STEVE PIASECKI
SECRETARY
cnF NOTE: When calling about , please, refer
this Notice1800 South
to File No. M 90-15
Address: 1650 -
Bascom Avenue
5 "t C__1k�outl
' on Cwed
ollicu 1 the C�uat�
runty Clatk ,
ay '" nor
CITY OF CAMPBELL
7 0 .V O R T H F I R S T S T R E E T
CAM"BELL, CAL I F 0 R N I A 95008
(408', 866-2 i, 00
FAX a ( 4 0 ` 279-2572
Planning
Depanmeni.
Mr. Doke i:unter
hunter Prope^ties
20725 Valley Creen Dr. 100
Cupertino CA 95011
RE; OC.r File 11 M 90-15 (S 90-0r)
S,te Address: 1650-1800 South Bascom Avenue
August 9, 1990
Dear Mr. Deke:
Pursuant to Section 6--,943 cf the Government Code ofthe
State of the
California, please be, advised that the Planning Department
determination that the above -referenced application is:
_ Accepted as completed.
X-_ not Accepted - Incor-plete.
(See attached list of what is
necessary to make the application
complete.)
An application will not be posted on the Planning Commission agenda until
it has been accepted as complete.
If you have questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to
contact the undersigned at (408) 866-2140.
Sincerely,
Steve Piasecki O
P'anr.ing Director
ld
Attachment
f: formlets
CJJY OF CAMPBELL
Deke Hunter August 9, 1990
H90-15 (S90-01)
15650-1800 South Bascom Avenue
List of what is necessary to make the application complete:
1. Site plan does not reflect arcade treatment.
2. Elevations:
A) East elevation shows tower element incorrectly at,d does not
show loading door or loading area.
3. Arcade treatment and outside storage area needs more detail.
4. Review adequacy of trash enclosures.
5. Provide pedestrian connection to Robw.y and Bascom Avenue
6. Provide full size set of plans (5 copies).
ocs PLII
TFL I
COMMISSION APPLICATION
I Iry
I,.- THEIR APP. ICAI IONS.
.qED P, STATF iA- ItC, NOTWIFY APP14CANIS Or IMF COMPLETENESS
Issfoh AGENDA.
IS 'COL. PLANNING cow—
F Noyfz STAFF - CAN BE POSTED ON A
;4��111,11ATIONS %.ICI, ARE FOUND 10 BE OMPL
j650- 50 BaSCOM AvenA-e_ APM: -1-2.3,
pROpEpT,j LOCATION/ADDRESS:
WE FILED: GENERAL PLAN: -C-
Us, P*,.it
Architectural ApprovalTyp, of kpip� ICATtON; planned 00-16Pat" P.-itGtntral Zone change
Plan AawhdWt
Other
TtLEPHOMEt -LAMl_
IA.E.
ADDRESS: ino. CA j5C)14
Cuper
CITY/STAIE 16
nn!TL�lwtmffi Proportl9fil TELEPHONE 1254
NAME:
ADDRESS! _371 Villaqe Square
zipt ---%4561
Clly!SIATE:
PLEASE ATTACHED SEPARATE SHEET FOR OTHERS THAI you VIISN 10 RECEIVE COPIES OF STAFF REPOP15 A ACE40AS.
rty W-tY ak. this
ASFIDAVIIISICHAIURE(S1: 6, nereby tart fy
onf I having -1 "t"St f th.ibov--d.s-ibwd I.P. �"` I '; I
b a Cdli 11 k
The undwrs4gnod 44",/ I;,JQ* 4,4 be, If.
the provision. the Campbell 1 .1
with th . - n"
the s
.PP) is true and
he Ivan wain
aft, as a
Opt, Y n*1 ghlWa
Vail`
t,W
FEE PAIDs
PLANNING COMMISSION Mir. OATEt RECEIPT *I
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION!
Cl, COUNCIL MEEIINC, OATti
Cily COUNCI_ ACTION;
DATE PUBLISHED IN NLWSPAPERt
PpOPOSED USL-
#
City. lMpbell Steve plasecki, "16"ning Director
�f Cb, pjh�ftlnD
70 H. Filt St-, C-mPbe 11. ^ CAepart", 95006 140#1 666-2140
CITY OF C.AMPBELL
7 0 N O R T :1 F I R S T S T R E E T
C A M P B E L L. C A L I F 0 R N I A 9 S 0 0 8
1
4081 8 6 6 - 2 1 0 0
FAX t408) 379-2572 July 24, 1990
planning
DIP+nm*n+
Aetna Life Insurance Company
242 Trumbull street
Hartford Connecticut 06156
Attention: Aetna Realty Investors, Inc.
RE: Property known as
1650-0CA south
Bascom Avenue
Campbell
File NO. N 90-11 (S 90-01)
Dear Gentlemen: purchasing the
ou Contemplate P In connection with your
you,:ave advised us
(the Property")• certain
above -referenced property ou have requested that l verify k contemplated
contemplated purchase, Y expansion and remodeling
information concerning the
Tans i-isted as appeoved exhibits in the paragraion of ph below. the
by the p Commission referred to in paragraP
Campbell Planning
We hereh!' confirm the following: the City of Campbell required
approvals by ranted, exceot for
1• All discretionary the
Project have been g
in connection withspecified in the conditions Campbell
the additional approvals
ted on June 12, 1990 (for example,
approval listed in Resolution No. 2674 of the City
Planning Commission ado
approval by the Planning Commission of a landscapingnd no
lighting plan and a sign program). While n can g� Y
approvals will be granted, we do not
approvals which
assurances that such permits
still Must be
anticipate any problems in this re ling
All app
have been granted are final. Building p
obtained for the Project, but the u on satisfactioissuance will nofthe
ministerial act conditioned only Prred to
ove
conditions set forth in cements o We . 2674 rete on to believe
and other standard requ provided the
that such building pecn.its will not be issued,
lant building code and fire code requirements.
itions referred to above are satisfied
conend that the
d
presented p e mee
CITY OF CAMNBELL
Aetna Life Insurance Company
July 24, 1990
Page Two
After completion of the project as approved, the property will
comply with the Zoning Ordinance and regulations currently in
effect for the property at that time. Future amendments and
changes to the Zoning ordina .ce or regulations can not be
determined at this time in regards to future compliance.
The Planning Commission ap-)roval is valid as specified in
condition 22 of Resolution No. 2674. A valid Planning
Commission approval is requires: to allow issuance of building
permits.
The udersigned is the Planning Department representative who has had
primary responsibility for processing the Project.
City of Campbell
By:
Name: Tim J. Haley
Title: Planner 11
SACHS & PHELPS o.cm
C_ B PIIRIr M_K sue'
D�msA x..mo- D—%L V-A—.
1U_Ganwiv LAWYERS Mw�fATNo.11.. xV.�.Mn
S_QW! A9
M. ,E—P-..�.. SurtE 500 • Fox Vurw n..�i't
u�.
Al— 2121 AVENUE OF THE STARS
3—V_Erwmax' LDSNGE ANGELES. CAUFORNu 90067-5010 T�� ki—H wy
P_v, _ (215)551420
Bump D. Roa • 7ti_
D —Jm B— July 20, 1990 San"
Sr•x H— T*_
sm.0 L Qwrwv (213) 551J210
Qw 01 Wavy
DwvmL P—
D—L G— Gm, F—N—
.P�,�snC a
10012.117
VIA TEL•ECOPIER
Tim J. Haley
Planner II
City of Campbell
70 North First Street
Campbell, California 95008
Re: Hamilton Plaza Sh000ina Center
Dear Tim:
Pursuant to our conversation, enclosed is the form
of letter we would like to have signed to provide Aetna with
some assurances concerning the expansion and remodeling of the
Center. We think it is accurate based on our various con-
versations with you. If you have comments, please call me.
In the event it is acceptable in this form, please retype it
on your letterhead, sign it, or have it signed by the appro-
priate person, and return it to m,'-
Thank you for your assistance.
Very truly yours,
Susan L. Claman
Professional Corporation
By Susan L. Claman
Its President
SLC/igw
Enclosure
F.\IW\L7R\HAIEY
CITY OF CAMPBELL
7 0 N O R T H F I R S T S T R E E T
C A M P 8 E L L. C A L I F 0 R N IA 95008
(408) 866-2100
FAX 1 (408) 379-2572
Planning July 12, 1990
Department:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
242 Trumbull Street
Hartford, Connecticut 06156
Attn: Aetna Realty Investors, Inc.
RE: Hamilton Plaza - 1650 - 1800 South Bascom Avenue
Campbell CA 95008
Dear Investors:
Pursuant your attorney's letter dated 7-5-90, wherein she request
verification of the zoning compliance, please be advised of the
following information regarding the referenced properties:
- The subject properties are currently shown as C-2-S (General
commercial) on the City's Zoning Map;
- The subject property is shown as a commercial designation on
the City's General Plan; and,
- The existing retail uses within the shopping center are
consistent with this Zoning District and are listed as
permitted uses under the General/Commercial Zone.
Since the time of the original shopping center approval, the City has
imposed a Conditional Use Permit requirement for auto service
operations and liquor establishments. An expansion �', or the
creation of new uses similar to this would require approval of a
Conditional Use Permit.
If you should have any questions regarding any of the above
information, please do not hesitate to contact the Planning
Department, at (408) 866-2140.
Sincerely,
Tim J. Haley
Planner II
lr
• � r
SACHS & PHELPS o,ca
K S_
G,N.fl rw� Do.• iL V�. Aum�.
pw.A Lrun' LAWYERS Nw.r�Tho�.�L
A S_J b
t—O. WOan— SUr1E 500 • Fox Prw7w 9n�r1 Is
War E_PmP 2121 AVENUE OF THE STARS
A7lrmar
fo,...V,..E,.o Los ANDS F& CAupRNU 90067-5010 Izu)531170U
W..o.N.�' TWP
rw..vm..,uo
70
D�wi e. � '�'
July 5 , 1990 Ty�.s
S—H— Ins) uriza
S� L Qwr�r
on PPQ Walt
Dw L►m O-Fxl Norm
D—L.0�
•IaprC ws
10012.117
VIA FEDERAT EXPRESS � � � 8�
Tim J. Haley
Planner II
City of Campbell IU!_ 1990
O
70 North First Street CITY F CAMPBELL
Campbell, California 95008 CpmrjpRj pAA*pgAk-
Re: Property
located at PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1650-1800 South Bascom Avenue
Campbell, California
tinownas Hamilton Plaza
Dear Tim:
As you know from our conversation on Tuesday, our
firm is representing Aetna Life Insulance Company in connec-
ro erty
of
n�
tion with its contemplated acquisition
as the
powert to our
conversation, I adiny yo
u referred to above. in that regardthis letter to request copies
of the following items1990,
t
I. Negative Declaration dated April 2
issued in connection with the project, including the _nitial
study referred to in the Negative Declaration.
2, Minutes from the Plannlnq Commission meeting or
meetings which contain findings with respect to the Negative
Declaration.
Tim .7. Haley
July 5, 1990
Page Two
7. Final Notice of Determination with respect to
the Negative Declaration which was filed by the County Clerk's
Office.
I also would like to request the issuance to Aetna
of a letter confirming zoning compliance similar to the letter
dated June 5, 1990, you sent to Deke Hunter (a copy of which
is enclosed for your). Please address the lett:,r as follows:
Aetna Life Insurance Company
242 Trumbull Street
Hartford, Connecticut 06156
Attention: Aetna Realty Investors, Inc.
Please send the letter to me.
I als, expect to be sending you sh:,rtly a request
for assurances regarding the proposed remodeling and expan-
sion.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter. The
targeted closing date is next week, so we would appreciate
anything you could do to expedite our receipt of the requested
items. Should you have any questions regarding this request,
please call me.
very truly yours,
Susan L. Claman
Professional Corporation
r
i
By Susan L. Claman
Its President
SLC/igw
Enclor,ire
cc: Mr. Deke Hunter, Jr. (w/o enclosure) Via Federal Express
F:\I W\L'M\li ♦LEY
('ITY !IF i'.aMl'ItEl.l.
7 0 N 0 R T H F' R S T S T R E E T
C A M P 8 E L L C A L I F O R N I A 9 5 0 0 8
(406) 865 2100
FAX t ( 4 0 8 ) 379 2572
I
Planning June 5, 1990
De0anmanl'
Mr. Deke Hunter, Jr.
Hunter Properties
20725 Valley Green Drive
Suite No. 100
Cupertino, CA 95014
RE: Hamilton Plaza - 1650 - 1800 South Bascom Avenue
Dear Deke:
Pursuant to your letter dated June 5, 1990, wherein you request
verification of the zoning compliance, please be advised of the
following information:
- The subject properties are currently shown as C-2-S
(General Commercial on the City's Zoning Map;
- The subject property is shown as a commercial
designation on the city's General Plan; and,
- The existing retail uses within the shopping center are
consistent with this Zoning District and are listed as
permitted uses under the General/Commercial Zone.
Since the time of the original shopping center approval, the City
has imposed a Conditional Use Permit requirement for auto service
operations and liquor establishments. An expansion of, or the
creation of new uses similar to this would require approval of a
Conditional Use Permit.
If you should have any questions regarding any of the above
information, please do not hesitate to contact the Planning
Department, at (408) 866-2140.
Sincerei,,
l
Tim �J. Ha'ley
Planner II
ks
PITY OF C.AMPHILL
7 0 N O R T H F I R S T S T R E E T
CAMPBELL. C A L I F 0 R N I A 95009
(308) a66.2100
FAX r (408) 379-2572
popanm�m-.
Planning July 2, 1990
Deke Hunter
20725 Valley Green Drive
Cupertino, CA 95014
PM 90-08 - Corresponding Files M 90-11 (S 90-01))
APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP "ANDS OF HUNTER PROPERTIES
APN: 288-011-1, 2, 3,
SITE ADDRESS: 1650-1800 South Bascom Avenue
The Planning Director and the Public Works Director have approved the
referenced Tentative Parcel Map based upon the mandatory finding that
this Tentative Parcel Map, together with the provisions for its design
and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan of the City of
Campbell.
The final map shall be filed with the City Engineer for examination,
approval and recordation in accordance with the provisions of the
subdivision Map Act.
This approval is subject to the following Conditions:
1. File a final parcel map in accordance with the provisions of the
State Subdivision Map Act.
2. File an application for segregation of the assessments levied by
Local Improvement District No. 28.
3. Applicant to provide verification of recordable mutual access and
parking rights for lots 1 and 2 for approval by the Planning
Director, prior to final map approval.
APPROVED BY THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
ON Jul 21 1990
Steve Piasecki, Planning Director
APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER
ON July 3, 1990
Donal IM rly, Dirac r of
Public Works
cc: Engineer
Public Works
Noti-* of tkteneinatio
CITY OF CAMPBELL
70 NON',H FIRST STREET
CAMPSELL. CALIFORNIA 9SOO111
To: _ Office of Planning and Research From City of Campbell
Planning Department
1 400 Tenth Street. Room 121
70 North First Street
Sacramentu, CA 95611 f Campbell. CA 95006
c.;&Wnty Clerk's Office
Santa Clara County I
191 North First Street
San Jose, CA 95113
Ageot:
R" of NWIM of DetarntlnaslOn to camp6anee trllh Salton 21108 of 21152 of the Publk MSOWOM COOS.
90-01 -
�—
I
Ttm J. Haley, Planner 11 (106) 666-2110.
Su1e (1e InotM Number Lad Alm Area CodelTeleptiaar:Sitautai
(1f inairrra a CUWW4h e t Contact Petsoa
16So - 1800 Sovlh Bascom Avenue, Campbell, Santa Clara County. California
IIILomkin Iaicllde county)
Project OMt►Iptlon:
City of Campbell Ms approved theato+e bed I'Mact v
This is to advise that the City
O� Air
'�
rrm
April 24. 1990
and has nude the following deinoons regarding tM above drxnbed Ieo' . n
(Orel
1. The project (C)will Qwill not] have a ugnifrcanl effect on tM environment.
2. ❑ M Fnrvvonmental Impact Report was prepared for his project pursuant to the provisions of CEQ -
A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant 10 the provisions of CEQA.
). Mitigation measures (❑were ($were blot] made a condition of the approval of the projecL
a. A statement of Overnd)ng Considerations (❑was (21was not) adopted for UUI PrujecL
5. Findings (®Mete ❑wart not] made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
t _n
This is'o certify than the final EIP with comments and responses and record of project approval is available
Negative Declaration TI
Signature
Date received for filing at OPR:
GW—
Reviarl October 1989
a
PIANMING CONUSSIOM
ACTIN
Reagendize yea —
Hearing a.con U
Newspaper ------
Notice Public
cc Mtg. N A
Remove: --
}es
Project Planner/Staff Report prepared Sby Initial:
taff Report:
PLANNING COMT.ISSION AGENDA890ITEM NO. ` lication of Mr.
SITE MEETING DATE: on nucd Public Hearing to consider thc0aPI to a preva viously
Item Title/Description: rovai of revisions to the condtiuns of app
Deke Hunter for app roval allowing the remodel of an existingS.
approved Site an Architectural app
shopping center �n property located at 1850 1800 South Bascom Avenue in a C-2
� r
ACTION_ TA1C79f J L{
Yi:i
RESOLUTION ADOPTED
arvewdm»mt
Modified Findings ecommended
Modified Conditions 4,
ORDINANCE NEEDED
RECOMMENDATION FROM STAFF
Approved as submitted
Approved as modified
VOTE
MOTION=--=—�
unanimous
absent _
abstain ,
passed
failed
roll call
PUBLIC HEARING:
opened
Motion
Closed
continued _
unanimous
no votes
absent
abstain
'"�F";1,'HE' MOTION :::::............
..........
::: DIRECTED By CHAIR:
RIEERRED TO: —
Report ----
Appropriate Action __
Prepare Papers —
HELD TO: �—jrom 4124/se
PUBLIC HEARING '=ONTINUED:
COMPLETE APPLI TION
� r
FOLLOW Up COMPLETED BY..iled
/MINUTESronmenta.1 MAILEDnTOlASSESSORaBY: on:
FILED
File on left handside of File when complete
r —JI►-- -
CITY OF CAMPBELL
7 0 N O R T H F I R S T S T R E E T
CAMPBE LL, C A L I F 0 R N I A 9500a
(408) 866-2100
FAX • ( 4 0 8 ) 3%9 2572
June 14
Planning
Doparlmerd:
Mr. poke Hunter
20725 Vallay Green Drive, Suite 100
Cupertino, CA 95014
its: M 90-11(5 90-01)
Dear Deke:
n at its meeting of June
:lease be advised that the Planning Commissiorequest to modify the A copy
12, 1990, adopted Resolution 2674, approving your
screening walls and parking area assis enclosed.
ociated with your project.
of the adopted resolution and a redlined site plan
If you should have any questions regarding this Ipproval or the
modification, please do not hesitate to contact the Planning Department
at (408) 866-2140.
Sincerely,
Tim J. He 6
-
Planner II
cc: Building Department
Fire Department public Works Department
Bill Hagman, Architect
r
RESOLUTION NO. 2674
pLANNING COMMISSION
BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF CA14PBELL APPROVING MODIFICATIONS
TO THE REVIOUSLY
D SITE A314D ARCHITELTURAL
APPLICATIONALLOWINGPTHE EREMODEL AND EXPANSION
OF AN EXISTING SHOPBASCOMENVENUEO,14 (APROPER8Y1KNOWN 3' 4,
AS 1650-1800 SOUTH
5, and 56) IN A C-FILEZNO- M 90-1RI CT. APPLICATION 0
MR. DEICE HUNTER,
After notification and public hearing as specified by law le the
application notification
Mr. Deke Hunter for bpproval of plans and elevatiotural
ns to
reviously approved Site and ArchiteCcenter
expansion of an existing shopping allow modifications to the p
approval to allow remodel and eSo after presentation
on property known as 1650-1800 South Zoning Districtf, and, after
288-11-1,2,3,4,5,56) in a Cand opponents, the hearing was
by the Planning Director, proponents
closed.
After due consideration of all evidence presented, the Planning
Commissi.on did find as follows: ro riate scale in relationship
1 ���a: The proposed project is an ape P
to the adjacent developed uses. blends
The project is well designed and are an improvement.
architecturally
2' into t neighborhood The remodeled buildings into the
Provided parking ratio Of 1:210 for retail uses is
due to the size of shopping center,
3• parkins• pedestrian
considered acceptablepublic transit and provision of p
accessibility to p
walkways. infringement on
c moatibility: The project is designed to minimize ag
4' ernes with the addition of screen walls.
neighboring properties P
-na&Qao1M'. Substantial landscaping has been provided which awls
�
5 to the aesthetics of the project with the in
of Tree wells
and street frontage landscaping. will be
project, subject to the
6.
r .,a it ions: The conditions imposed,
consistent with the General Plan; and,
7.'
The proposed project, subject to the required conditions,
a.
will aid in the harmonious development of the immediate are act the
ich
The site currently generates no 1T?easedh�levelopment will
S. Noise: residential areas. Thep p area along
quiet of adjoining enerated from the delivery
potentially add to the noise rgo property lines.
the easterly and northerly p P
AVM .-�
Resolution No. 2674
PC MTG: June 12, 1990
File No. M 90-11 (S 90-01) - 1650 - 1880 S. Bascom
page 2
Based on the above findings, the Planning Commission does hereby grant
the requested development, subject to the attached conditions:
1. Revised Site Plan: Revised site plan indicating items per staff
comment sheet to be submitted to the Planning Department and
approved by the Planning Commission prior to application for a
Building Permit.
2. Fencing/Landscaping: Property to be fenced and landscaped as
indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing
shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans.
3. Landscape Plan and Lighting: Landscaping and lighting plan
indicating type and size of plant material, details of pedestrian
walkways, location of irrigation system and location and design of
lighting to be submitted to the Planning Department for review by
Site and Architectural Review Committee and approval by the Planning
Commission prior to issuance of Building Permits.
4. Fencing and Wall Plan: Applicant shall submit a fencing and wall
plan for approval of the Site and Architectural Review Committee,
providing for the installation of a six foot precast wall along the
easterly property line to be constructed 4n two phases and an eight
foot precast wall to be constructed between the adjacent residential
uses and the new retail building during Phase I, prior to issuance
of Building Permits.
5. Faithful Performance Bond or Agreement: Applicant to either (1)
post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $40,000 to ensure
landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months
of completion of construction; or (2) file a written agreement to
complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond
or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to
application for a Building Permit.
6. Utility Box Screening: Applicant to submit a letter to the Planning
Department, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer)
boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if boxes
are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director.
7. Roof Eauipment Screening: All mechanical equipment on roofs and all
utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director.
8. @}Lt.I',ing Occupancy/Public Improvements: Building occupancy of the
new ,tuildings will not be allowed until public improvements are
installed in accordance to phasing of public improvements.
0 0
Resolution No. 26 ' - M 90-11 (S 90-01)
Adopted June 12, 1: 0
1650 - 1800 South Bascom Avenue
page
veway
as to be
9 eveloped
inrcompliancewwith Chaptepra21�50 ofng dthe1Campbellemunicipal dcode.
All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or
ua g r
bumpeuards.
tilities: Underground utilities to be provided as
10, uded u
required by Section 20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code.
11. j2Uderaround Utilities Connection: Plans submitted to the Building
Division for a plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all
connections for underground utilities including water, sewer,
electric, telephone and television cables, etc.
12. Sian Aool_ i!_ation: Sign application to be submitted in Macsignatoe
be
crdnc
with provisions of the Sign ordinancef r all signsissued by the
installed until applic�=ion is approved
Planning and Building Departments (Section 21.53 of the Campbell
Municipal Code). A comprehensive sign program should be submitted
and approved by the Planning Commission prior to ibztuance of
building permits.
13. �'-`"^� CollectiQD: ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal
Code stipulates that garbagetand�rubbishfor eproduced-ollectlwithin theon and plir-itsf
refuse, garbage,
of the City of Campbell shall beesato allwith
single family dwellings,
Company. This requirement app mnt construction to all commercial
industrial,
multiple apartment
manufacturing,
14. T a�^ntainer_
A RaryGle Area: Trash container(s) of a size and
ss
quantity neceary to serve the development shall be located in
area(s) approved by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be
constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the
All screening to
trash enclosure area to serviceand these containersral Review Committee
be approved by
15. diraooed Reauireme�ts: Applicant shall comply with all
ro riate State and City requirements for the handicapped. Three
app p the retail building frontage
additional spaces shall be added a onq
as indicated on the redlined Exhibit phase I - Site Plan.
Public WI k D�Dartment
t
16. n„a Durkous: Provide two bus ducKouts with concrete pads as
approved by City,a Engineer in Phase I.
17. s rhment P�,LIDI.t:
obtain an encroachment permit, pay fees, and
post surety for relocating driveways, constructing curb gutter an
sidewali and for any other work required in the public
right-of-way.
Resolution No. 2674 File No. M 90-11 (S 90-01)
Site Address: 1650 - 1800 S. Bascom Avenue
Adopted June 12, 1990
rage 4
is. frading/Drainage Plans: Provide five sets of grading and drainage
plans for new building sites. Show how overall drainage of site
works, including alleyway.
19. Parking Adiustment: Adjust parking adjacent to bus duckout on
Bascom Avenue.
20. ftrking Study: Provide support to show that reduced parking ratio
will be adequate to support proposed use.
Building Division
21. Pedestrian Walkway: A sidewalk should be added at the south entry
approach to keep the handicapped and pedestrians out of the drive
path of automobile= It is also required in current handicapped
regulations.
Planning Department:
22, Site and Arphitectural ADDrgyal - Phase I and II:
a) Phase I construction to commence by February 1, 1991. Phase I
allows the remodel of the existing shopping center and the
construction of 28,500 square feet of additional retail space.
b) Phase II construction to commence by February 1, 1998. Phase II
allows the remodel of the remainder of the shopping center and the
construction of 7,600 square feet of additional retail space. The
completion of the landscaping improvements and reconfiguration of
the parking area.
23. Aooro-ed Exh°bits: Site and Architectural Approval is granted to
remodel and add -on to the existing Hamilton Plaza Shopping Center,
as indicated on the exhibits approved by the Planning Commission
on
April 24, 1990, and June 12, 1990, as "redlined" to reflect approved
changes. Said approved exhibits are as follows:
- site Plan - Phase I, as redlined, dated 4/24/90 and June 12,
19Q0
- Site Plan - Phase I1, dated 4/24/90
- Architectural Perspective
- Preliminary Landscape Plan - Phase I, dated 4/18/90
- Architectural Rendering, elated 1/4/90
- Corner Retail Pad - Floor Plan
- Corner Redated 316tail Pad - rlevations90, Exhibit No. 5
- Floor Plan - Retail Building, / /
- Rear Retail Pad - Elevations, - Elevation, dated 1/4/90, Exhibited 316/90, Exhibit No. 6
Exhibit
ti h'L F. + 'f �l 'FV-Lt
2674 File No. M 90-11 (S 90-01)
Resolution N°•
1650 - 1800 South Bascom Avenue
site dJune 12, 1990
Adopted
the service area shall be restricted
Page 5 daily_ The loading
Deliveries ', 7:00 p m „ The
+ ry li4ll7:00 a.m„ and the restriction.
24. ""the hours of to inform drivers of onsibility for
between Poste shall
dock area shall be owner shall assume full responsibility
applicant/property
enforcement of this condition. the date
bell Municipal Code provides that any
Of the Camp shall expire one year after
Section 21.42.100 this Section extension or
ranted under ranted, unless an
approval 9 roval was 9
upon which such aPP roved. rovai of the
reinstatement is app s ision of apP
Approval is effectiveappealten
planning Commafter decappeal is tiled. roll
isaion� of June 1990, by the following
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day
call vote: vox Alne, Meyer, Wilkinson,
Commissioners: Christ, vox,
AYES: Olszevski,
NOES: Commissioners: None.
ABSENT: Commissioners: None. Jav R PBLt1Dg�
APPROVED: Chairperson
e e Pia- k�—
ATTEST* Secretary
Ask Agh
` APPROVED MODIFIED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR FILE NO. M 90-11 (S
SS: 1650 - 1800 SOUTH BASCOM AVENUE
APPLICANT: DERE HUNTER
P.C. MTG. DATE: 6/12/90
The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that
he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with
the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of
California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she
is required to comply with all applicable Codes and Ordinances of the
City of Campbell and the State of California, which pertain to this
development and are not herein specified.
1. v' a _§3_t@ Plan: Revised site plan indicating items per staff
comment sheet to be submitted to the Planning Department and
approved by the Planning Commission prior to application for a
Building Permit.
2. Fencing/Landscaping: property to be fenced and landscaped as
indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing
shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans.
3. tandscaoe Plan and Lighting: Landscaping and lighting plan
indicating type and size of plant material, details of pedestrian
walkways, location of irrigation system and location and design of
lighting to be submitted to the Planning Department for review by
Site and Architectural Review Committee and approval by the Planning
Commission prior to issuance of Building Permits.
4. Fencing and Wall Plan: Applicant shall submit a fencing and wall
plan for approval of the Site and Architectural Review Committee,
providing for the installation of a six foot precast wall along the
easterly property line to be constructed in two phases and an eight
foot precast wall to be constructed between the adjacent residential
uses and the new retail building during Phase I, prior to issuance
of Building Permits.
5. Faithful Ferformance Bond or Agreement: Applicant to either (1)
post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $40,000 to ensure
landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months
of completion of construction; or (2) file a written agreement to
complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond
or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to
application for a Building Permit.
6. utility Box Screening: Applicant to submit a lettsr to the Planning
Department, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer)
boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if boxes
are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director.
7. Roof _Eyyipment Screening: All mechanical equipment on roofs and all
utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director.
� Ah
APPROVED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR FILE NO. M 90-11 (S 90-01)
PC-MTG- June 12, 1990
1650 - 1880 S. Bascom
page 2
6 -a O oar v/Public Imor dIDunt
Building occupancy of the
new buildings will not be all�.ad until public improvements are
installed in accordance to phasing of public improvements.
9. Parkina/Driveways: All parking and drive, ,y areas to be developed
in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code.
All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or
bumper guards.
10. required by Section 20.36n15uutilities
0 oftheCampbell Municipal Code as
lans
the
11• Division forualplanecnecRn>ca�inindicate clearlyethe olocationlofnall
utilities including water, sewer,
connections for underground
electric, telephone and television cables, etc,
-- `o0lication: Sign application to be submitted in accordance
12.
with provisions of heSign
Ordinance
l
approved andpermgitsissuedsbynto be
the
installed until application
Planning and e). Anco comprehensive sign ts tprogram 5should hbeCsubmitted
Municipal COartmen
de). p
and approved by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of
building permits.
13. ^--baaeection: Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal
Code stipulates that garbageny contract
rubbishthe
producedcollection
within theplimitsal f
refuse, garbage,
of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Dispose
Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings,
multiple apartment units; to all commercial, business, industrial,
manufacturing, and construction establishments.
14. Trash_r'.4 miner and Recycle Area: Trash container(s) 0f a size and
quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located e
area(s) approved by the Fire Department. All enclosurto es to be
constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent scree
to
the
trash enclosure area to service these containers. All scree
be approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee.
15. ed Requirements: Ap-licant shall comply with allThree
andia
ppropriate State and City rrquirementstherretail the abuildingdfrontage
asdindicatedponEthehredlineddded Exhibitnphase I - Site Plan.
Public Works Department
16. Ras DuckOu : Provide two bus duckouts with concrete pads as
approved by City's Engineer in Phase I.
r�
r1
U
APPROVED CONDI'ilON OF APPROVAL
Pew' June 12, 1990_ 1650 - 1880 S. Bascom
File No. M 90-11 (S 90-01)
page 3
w nt Permit: Obtain an encroachment permit, pay fees, and
for relocating driveways, constructing curb gutter and
17. n ` public
post surety other work required in the p
sidewalks and for any
right-of-way. and drainage
rall drainage of site
is. radin-i
^-ainaae Plans: Provide five sets of grading
plans for new Du iiu a,�y sites. Show how ove
works, including alleyway.
Adjust parking adjacent to bus duckout on
19.
Bascom AvenueY' . irking ratio
Provide support to show that reduced p
20, Parking support proposed use.
will be adequate to
n tiding Division entry
21. a Arian Watkwav: A sidewalk shouldedestriansaout hOfsh be aded the drive
approach to keep
the handicapped eC p
path of automobiles. It ir
s also required in current handicapped
regulations.
Planning Deuartment:
22 $ ral ADDroval - PhaseI' 1991 phase I
Phase I construction to commence by February 1,
a) g in center and the
allows the remodel of the are fen of additional
construction of 28,500 square feet of additional retail apace.
b) phase II construction to commence by February 1, 1998. Phase II
allows the remodel of the remainder of the shopping center and the
construction of 7,600 square fsetfa&slitiandlreconfiguratioretail space -n of
e
completion of the landscapingimprovement
the parking area.
Site and Architectural Approval is granted to
Hamilton Plaza Shopping center,
23. remodel Exhibits: Commission on
remodel and add -on to the existiroved by the Planning roved
as indicated on the exhibits approved
April 24, 1990, and June 12, 1990, as "redlinad" to reflect approved
approved exhibits are as follows:
Site Plan - Phase I, as redlined, dated 4/24/90 and June 12,
changes. Said
1990 dated a/24/90
- Site Plan - Phase II,
- Architectural Perspective dated 4/18/90
- Preliminary Landscape plan
- Phase
l/4/90
Architectural Rendering,
dated Corner Retail Pad - Elevations
Ask Ak
MODIFIED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
pC-'M1Cr June 12, 1990 _ 1650 - 1880 S. Bascom
File No. M 90-11 (S 90-01)
page 3
Floor Plan - Retail Building, dated 3/16/90, Exhibit No. 5
Rear Retaildated 1levations, fated 3/ 16/90, Exhibit No. 6
- 7.
24. Dalivaw Hours°
Deliveries to the service area
of a.m., and 7 p.m. daily. ealoading dock ll be carea ted bshall nh
be Posted
to inform drivers of the restriction. The applicant/property owner
shall assume full responsibility for enforcement of this condition.
• f •
a 0
RESOLUTION NO. 2674
PLANNING COMMISSION
BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL APPROVING MODIFICATIONS
TO THE FREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL
APPLICATION ALLOWING THE REMODELAND
D EXPANSIONOWN
OF AN EXISTING SHOPPINC CENTER 2
AS 1650-1800 SOUTH BASCOM AVENUE (APN' 288-RTY11-1, �.
5, and 56) IN A C 2-S ZONING DIS1RI S 90-0APP1)CATION OF
MR. DERE HUNTER,
After notification and public hearing as specified by law on the
of Mr. Doke Hunter for approval of plans and elevations to
application ev
allow mod itlof Kr s to the pr. approved Site and Architectural
approval to allow, re-.0--ol and expansion of an existing shopping center
Avenue APN:
on property known as 1650-1800 South Bascom nDistrict' and, after presentation
288-11-1,2,1,4,5,56) in a Crc onentsand opponents, the hearing was
by the Planning Director, p P
closed.
After due consideration of all evidence presented, the Planning
Commission did find as follows: appropriate scale in relationship
1, kcal": The proposed project. is an appro P
to the adjacent developed uses. blends
The project is wellem�ejseddbuildingsiare tanaimpllyrovement.
int.: the neighborhood
provided parking ratio of 1:210 for retail
is
considered ty to able publicue o transiteendzprovisi npofgp
edestrian
accessibility to p
walkways.
womoatibi.lity: The project is designed to minimize infringement or
4' properties with the addition of screen walls.
neighboring p P
^daraoina_: Substantial landscaping has been provided which adds
5. �' project with the introduction of tree walls
to the aasihetics of the proj
and street frontage landscaping. imposed, will be
6. conditions: The project, subject to the conditions
consistent with the Goner
al Plan; and,
The proposed project, subject to the required conditions,
7. H!►Il!=:
will aid in the harmonious development i the levelsimmwhich arpact the
The site currently generates noise pposedhdevelopment will
S. quiet of adjoining residential areas. The prop
potentially add to the noise generated from the delivery area along
the easterly and northerly property lines.
Resolution No. 2674
PC NTG: June 12, 1990
File No. N 90-11 (S 90-01) - 1650 - lsa0 S. Bescom
page 2
Based on the above findings, the Planning Commission does hereby grant
the requested development, subject to the attached conditions:
1. Revised Site Plan: Revised site plan indicating items per staff
comment sheet to be submitted to the Planning Department end
approved by the Planning Commission prior to application for a
Building Permit.
2, Fencina/L..lndscaoina: Property to be fenced and landscaped as
indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and !ancing
shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans.
1. ��scape Plan and LiaA�jll9: Landscaping and lighting plan
indicating type and size of plant material, details of pedestrian
walkways, location of irr?gation system and location and design of
lighting to be submitted to the Planning Department for review by
Site and Architectural Review Committee and approval by the Planning
Commission prior to issuance of Building Permits.
4, r.nrtna and Nall Plan: Applicant shall submit a fencing and wall
plan for approval of the Site and Architectural Review Committee,
providing for the installation of a six foot precast wall along the
easterly property line to be constructed in two phases and an eight
foot precast wall to be constructed between the adjacent residential
uses and the new retail building during Phase I, prior to issuance
of Building Permits.
S. Faithful Performance Bond or Agreement: Applicant to either (1)
post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $40,000 to ensure
landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 7 months
of completion of construction; or (2) file a written agreement to
complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond
or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to
application for a Building Permit.
6. Utility Box Screening: Applicant to submit a letter to the Planning
Department, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer)
boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if boxes
are above ground) for approval of the Planni.r.g Director.
7. goofa��ic'^ent Screening: All mechanical equipment on roofs and all
Utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director.
e. B!ildina Occc panic Improvements: Building occupancy of the
new buildings will not be allowed until public improvements are
installed in accordance to phasing of public improvements.
Resolution No. 2674 - M 90-11 (S 90-01)
Adopted June 12, 1990
1650 - 1800 South Bascom Avenue
page J
9. P ZXjIIqjDr+veways: _All parking and driveway areas to be developed
in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code.
All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or
bumper guards.
10. Underaround Utilities: Underground utilities to be provided as
required by Section 20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code.
11. underground Utilities Connection: Plans submitted to the Building
Division for a plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all
connections for underground utilities including water, sewer,
electric, telephone and television cables, etc.
12. flan W2Iicatior.: Sign application to be submitted in accordance
with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to he
installed until application is approved and permit issued by the
Planning and Building Departments (Se(,tion 21.53 of the Campbell
Municipal Code). A comprehensive sign program should be submitted
and approved by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of
building permits.
13. Garbage Collection: Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal
Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of
refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits
of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal
Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings,
multiple apartment units; to all commercial, business, industrial,
manufacturing, and construction establishments.
14. Trash Container end Recycle Area: Trash container(s) of a size and
quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in
area(s) approved by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be
constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the
tr,Nsh enclosure area to service these containers. All screening to
be approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee.
15. HandicapRed Reauiremente: Applicant shall comply with all
appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. Three
additional spaces shall be added along the retail building frontage
as indicated on the redlined Exhibit phase I - Site Plan.
Public Works Deoa;Slo t
16. Bus Duckouts: Provide two bus duckouts with concrete pads as
approved by city's Engineer in Phase I.
17. Encroachment Permit: Obtain an encroachment permit, pay fees, and
post surety for relocating driveways, constructing curb gutter and
sidewalks and for any other work required in the public
right-of-way.
Resolution No. 2674 File No. M 90-11 (S 90-01)
Site Address: 1650 - 1800 S. Bascom Avenue
Adopted June 12, 1990
page 4
16. Grading/Drainage Plans: Provide five sets of grading and drainage
plans for new building sites. Show how overall drainage of site
works, including alleyway.
19. Parking Adjustment: Adjust parking adjacent to bus duckout on
Bascom Avenue.
20. parking Study: Provide support to show that reduced parking ratio
will be adequate to support proposed use.
gy"OiD9__0 iv i s ion
21. pq�jgg*rian Walkway: A sidewalk should be added at the south entry
approach to keep the handicapped and pedestrians out of the drive
path of automobiles. It is also required in current handicapped
regulations.
planning_L,eoartmslit
:
21. Site and Architec-t-Ur App34va1 - Phase I and II:
a) Phase I construction to commence by February �, 1991. Phase
allows the remodel of the existing shopping center and the
construction of 28,500 square feet of additional retail space.
b) Phase II construction to commence by February 1, 1998. Phase II
allows the remodel of the remainder of the shopping center and the
construction of 7,600 square feet of additional retail space. The
completion of the landscaping improvements and reconfiguration of
the parking area.
23. Aooroved Exhibits: Site and Architectural Approval is granted to
remodel and add -on to the existing Hamilton Plaza Shopping Center,
as indicated on the exhibits approved by the Planning commission on
April 24, 1990, and June 12, 1990, as "redlined" to reflect approved
changes. Said approved exhibits are as follows:
- Site Plan - Phase I, as redlined, dated 4/24/90 and June 12,
1990
- Site Plan - Phase II, dated 4/24/90
- Architectural Perspective
- Preliminary Landscape Plan - Phase I, dated 4/18/90
Architectural Rendering, dated 1/4/90
- Corner Retail Pad - Floor Plan
- Corner Retail Pad - Elevations
- Floor Plan - Retail Building, dated 3/16/90, Exhibit No. 5
- Rear Retail Pad - Elevations, dated 3/16/90, Exhibit No. 6
- Elevation, dated 1/4/90, Exhibit No. 7.
Resolution No. 2674 File No. M 90-11 (S 90-01)
Site Address: 1650 - 1800 S. Bascom Avenue
Adopted June 12, 1990
page 5
24. Delivery Hours:
Deliveries to the service area shall be restricted between the hours
of 7 a.m., and 7 p.m. daily. The loading dock area shall be posted
to inform drivers of the restriction. The applicant/property owner
shall assume full responsibility for enforcement of this condition.
Section 21.42.100 of the Campbell Municipal Code provides that any
approval granted under this Section shall expire- one Year after the date
upon which such approval was granted, unless an extension or
reinstatement is approved.
Approval is effective ten days after decision of approval of the
Planning Commission, unless an appeal is filed.
PASSYD AND ADOPTED this 24th day of April, 1990 by the following roil
call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Perrine, Christ, Fox, Alne, Meyer,
Wilkinson, Olszewski
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: None
APPROVZO: Jay R. Perrine
Chairperson
ATTEST: Steve Riaseghi
Secretary
p 59CTNMI - +'-
1
f-
b
BASCOM AVENUE
►N.tt 1 tli! �l.N
BASCOM & HAMILTON CENTER
HUNTER PROPERTIES
~ Y 1650 - 1800
South Bascom
M 80-i:
a •i ATTACHMENT 2
RESOLUTION NO. 2674
PLANNING COMMISSION.
BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMK13SION
OF THE CITY OF CANPBELL APPROVING MODIFICATIONS
TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL
APPLICATION ALLOWING THE REMODEL AND EXPANSION
OF AN EXISTING SHOPPING CENTER ON PROPERTY KNOWN
5S and 56)OINSA CH2BSSCOK AVZONING DI4,
STRICT. APPLICATION OF
MR. DERE HUNTER, FILE NO. M 90-11 (S 90-01�.
After notification and public hearing as specified by law on the
applicati^n of Mr. Deke Hunter for approval of plans
aandAelevations
to
allow mo6_fications to the previously pp center
approval to allow remodel and expansion of an existing shopping
on property known as 1650-1800 South Bascom Avenue APN:
288-11-1,2,3,4,5,56) in a C-2-S Zoning District;and, after inggwasation
by the Planning Director, proponents and opponents,
closed.
After due consideration of all evidence presented, the Planning
Commission did find as follows:
1. Scale: The proposed project is an appropriate scale in relationship
to the adjacent developed uses.
2. Design: The projecr is well designed and architecturally blends
into the neighborhooC The remodeled buildings are an improvement.
3. Parkins: Provided parking ratio Of 1:210 for retail uses is
considered acceptable due to the size of shopping center,
accessibility to public transit and provision of pedestrian
walkways.
4 ��*,ar„ i�bility: The project is designed to minimize infringement on
neighboring properties with the addition of screen walls.
5. randscavina: Substantial landscaping has been provided which adds
to the aesthetics of the project with the introduction Of tree wells
and street frontage landscaping.
6. ggnditions: The project, subject to the conditions imposed, will be
consistent with the General Plan; and,
7. Harmony: The proposed project, subject to the required conditions,
will aid in the harmonious development of the immediate area.
8. Noise: The site currently generates noise levels which impact the
quiet of adjoining residential areas. The proposed development will
potentially ado to the noise generated from the delivery area along
the easterly and northerly property lines.
Oft
Resolution No- 2674
PC WG: June 12, _O1) - 1650 - 1880 S' Bascom
Pile No. M 90-11 (S 90
page 2
Based on the above findfngs, the Planning Commission does hereby grr.nt
the requested development, subject to the attached conditions:
Site Plan: Revised site plan indicating items per staff
1 Department and
Commission prior to application for a
comment sheet to be submitted to the Planning
approved by the Planning
Building Permit.
Property to be fenced and landscaped as
p and fencing
2, indicated an /or ad plans.
indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping
shall be maintained in accordance with the approved
no elan and I�iahtlD3: Landscaping and lighting plan
etails Of edestrian
3 indicating type and size of plant m�and location and design of
walkways, location of irrigation systemDe artment for review by
lighting to be submitted to the Planning p roved by the Planning
Site and Architectural Review Committee and apps
Commission prior to issuance of Building
ina and Wall Plan: Applicant shall submit a fencing and wall
4' -oval of the Site and Architectural Review Committee,
plan for app
g the
providing for the installation of a six foot prechaSeBaand ll aanneight
easterly property line to be constructed in two P acent residential
foot p during Phase I, prior to issuance
recast wail to be constructed between the adz
uses and the new retail building
of Building Permits.
r Agreement: Applicant to either (1)
5, '*hf� L1 Pe-formate-Rp �4 ---- 000 to ensure
post a faithful performance bond ino hpa=kingtareas4within 3 months
landscaping, fencing, and striping file a written agreement to
of completion of construction; or (2) parking areas. Bond
complete landscaping, fenci�3, and striping Department prior to
or agreement to be filed wit-b the Planning P
application for a Building
.+�'*v Box Screanina: Applicant to submit a ityte�ransformerto the �nning
6' rlor to installation of PG&E utility
( screening if boxes
Department, pas
boxes, indicating the joorcval of the PlanningdDirector
tion of the bQx
are above ground) for ap.
o r F Moment Scresimlli4: All mechanical equipment on roofs and all
7, roved by the Planning Director.
utility meters to be screened as approved of the
occupancy tg: Building occupancy
8. g,i� public improvements are
new buildings will not be allowed until
improvements.
installed in accordance to phasing
P
Resolution No. 2674 - M 90-11 (S 90-01)
Adopted June 12, 1990
1650 - 1800 South Bascom Avenue
page 3
9, pgJZira/Driveways: _All parking and driveway areas to be developed
in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code.
All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or
bumper guards.
10. tinderaround Utilities: Underground utilities to be provided as
required by Section 20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code.
11. Underground Utilities Qonnection: Plans submitted to the Building
Division for a plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all
connections for underground utilities including water, sewer,
electric, telephone and television cables, etc.
12. Sian Aoolication: Sign application to be submitted in accordance
with provisions of the sign Ordinance fo= all signs. No sign to be
installed until application is approved and permit issued by the
Planning and Building Departments (Section 21.53 of the Campbell
Municipal Code). A comprehensive sign program should be submitted
and approved by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of
building permits.
13. ^-rbaae Collection: Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal
Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal -Jf
refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits:
t
of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal
Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings,
multiple apartment units; to all commercial, business, industrial,
manufacturing, and construction establishments.
14. Trash Container and Recvcle Area: ;rash container(s) of a size and
aual,tity necessary to serve the development shall be located in
area(s) -,pproved Sy the Fire Department. All enclosures to be
constructed at gra'- level and have a level area adjacent to the
trash enclosure area to service these containers. All screening to
be a�*)roved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee.
16 gpndicaDDed uo,,,,trements: Applicant shall comply with all
appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. Three
additional spaces shall be added along the retail building frontage
as indicated on the redlined Exhibit phase I - Site Plan.
Public Works Department
16. DIW Duckouts: Provide two bus duckouts with concrete pads as
approved by city's Engineer in Phase I.
17. Encroachm ate* Permit: Obtain an encroachment permit, pay fees, and
post surety for relocating driveways, constructing curb gutter an
sidewalks and for any other work required in the public
right-of-way.
w�
Resolution No. 2674 F-.e No. M 90-11 (S 90-01)
Site Address: 1650 - 1800 S. Bascom Avenue
Adopted June 12, 1990
page 4
1B, redina/Dra'^�^
o plans: Provide five sets of grading and drainage
fbuilding sites. Show how overall drainage of sit*-'
plane or new
works, including alleyway-
19. Farkin° Adiustmer�t: Adjust parking adjacent to bus duckout on
Bascom Avenue. ratio
2p, Parkin, o Sudv: Provide support to show that reduced parking
will be adequate to support proposed use.
nldin° Division
21. Pedestrian WA1hM"_: A sidewalk should
edestriansed aout hofsthe hdrive
approach to keep the handicapped and pedestrians
in current handicapped
path of automobiles. It is also requi_
regulations.
vlannin° Department:
22. Jite an° nrc*<* ^r ral Approval - Phase I and II:1 1991. Phase I
Phase I construction to commence by February
a) shopping center and the
allows the remodel of the existing PP g, ace.
construction of 28,500 square feet of additional retail
Phase II
b) Phase II construction to commence by February
allows the remodel of the remainder of the shopping center and the
construction of 7,6C0 square feet of additional retail space. The
completion of the landscaping improvements and reconfiguration of
the parking area.
l Approval is granted to
23. Ao°roved Exhibii&: Site and Architecture
remodel and add -on to the existing Hamilton Plaza Shopping Center,
as indicated on the exhibits approved by the Planning Commission on
April 24, 1990, and June 12, 1990, as -red
lined" to reflect approved
changes. Said approved exhibits are as follows:
- Site Plan - Phase I, as redlined, dated 4/24/90 and June 12,
1990 dated 4/24/90
- Site Plan - Phase II,
- Architecturalperspective
- Phase I, dated 4/18/90
Preliminary dated 1/4/90
- Architectural Rendering,
- Corner Retail Pad - Floor Plan
- Corner Retail Pad - Elevations Exhibit No. 5
Floor Plan - Retail Building, dated 3/16/90, x
- Rear Elevationildated 1/4/90i1ExhibittNo.Jj16/90, Exhibit No. 6
r
U
BASCOM AVENUE
PAQJSCT O.T. - PHASE I
,r V PHASE 1 SITS PLAN
BAS_COM & HAMILTON CENTER L--j -T,,, I
rx.`. CAMPBELL. CALIFORNIA
HUNTER PROPERTIES
1650 - 1800
South BaBCOM
M 90-11
I
I
PF&Jm DATA -wur l
o „r
a$�e
BASCOM AVENUE
MIA�� 1 MTt KM
BASCOW &, HAMILTON CENTER
CAMPBELI. CALFORNIA
HUNTER PROPERTIES C�
Planning Commist. Minutes 6 June 12, 1"0
M 90-11 Public }'raring to consider the application of Mr. Deke
(S 90-01) Hunter for approval of revisions to the Conditions of
Hunter, D. Approval to a previously approved Site and Architectural
approval allowing the remodel of an existing shopping center
on property located at 1650-1800 South Bascom Avenue, in
a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District.
(Planning Commission action foul, unless appealed.)
Chairperson Perrine read the application into the record.
Staff Prevnt'tiOM Plannin Director Piasecld presented the application. hi hligIt ' g the
modifications: (1) ( �jpg) To reduce the sound wall height from 9 feet to 6 feet
along the easterly Property line
(2) (Sire Plan Modific tioncl To remove all existing trees throughout the
puking area for additional puking spaces in front of the Long's Drug
Store. He announced the Applicant's request to amend Condition of
Approval N3 (LAndscane Plan and Lighting) to delete the phrase:
"...phased removal of existing trees,..."
(3) (Site Plan. Modifications) To retain the existing 10-foot "monolithic"
sidewalk along Bascom Avenue, and to provide a 17-foot landscape
Id later be retrofitted with Phase 11.
area which cou
(4) To amend Condition of Approval #23 to change
the date indicated in"...- Site Plan - Phase 1, as redhned, dated 4/24/90"
be changed to "6/12/90."
Planning Director Piasecki then re commended approval of the applications with the
modifications.
Commissioner Olszewski asked why the Applicant wanted to lower the wall height.
Planning Director Piasecki responded that cost savings was the reason to lower the height
along with an assurance that the noise attenuation between the 2 heights were minimal.
Commissioner Olszewski ther asked about the pedestrian enn-utce between the 6- foot wall
and the 8-foot wall.
Via -Chairperson Meyer presented the Site & Architecture Review Committee finding as
follows:
- The Applicant assured the Committee that the removed trees -would be
replaced with "consigned" trees.
She announced the Committee's approval of the application.
Commissioner Olsuwsk' ►xpressed concern to the location of the trees. Planning uuector
Piasecki said Condition of approval N3 would bring this issue back to both the Site &
Architecture Review Committee and the Commission once location wa detemtined.
Commissioner Olszewski requested the Committee pay particular attention to this matter.
The Public Hearing was opened.
Ap. !icant D eke Hunter focused on his reasons to skip Phase 1 in favor of Phase 11 to
complete the parking, landscaping, and irrigation. He said the improved parking would
attract more tenants. His decision to reduce the height of the easterly soundwall came as a
result to offset the costs of moving the monolithic sidewalk, however noted that the wall
Planning Commission Minutes 7 June 12, 1990
along the pedestrian &tows would remain at g fat Mr. Hunter then explained the concept
of "contract growing procedures" which would assure matched and consistently tall trees.
Commission, Olszewski suggested that the LgtipppJgp be reviewed in addition to the
1,,vrcrane Pt " by the Sitea Architecture Review C rase. He also stressed the
importance of developing a distinct and timeless landscaping "theme" because of the
location of the Hamilton Plana Shopping Curter location.
M,'S Oiszewski/Meyer Motioned to close the Public Hearing.
VOTE: Unanimously approved.
Planning Director Steve Piasecki suggested adding Commissioner Otszewsld's request to
review the I,jhgngPlan at the same tirne as the IApdscoCPlan to Condition of Approval
03 (in addition to deleting the phrase: "...phased removal of existin4 trees ...), and to add
the June 12, 1990 Planning Commission date to the "redlined" item to Condition of
Approval 023.
M/S Meyer/Olszews%i Motioned to adopt Resolution 2674
according W dations,
including thechpproval of
Condition #3 (deletin the phrase -
"...phased
removal of existing trees,..." do
adding that the p{jp be reviewed
with the jap), and Approval
of Condition #23 (to read "- Site Plan
Phase 1, as rediined, dated 4/241" do
6/12/90), and that future lighting and
landscape plans come back to the Site do
Architecture Review Committee M well as
the Planning Commission.
VOTE: Ayes: Commissioners Christ, Fox, Alne, Me; er,
Wilkinson, Olszewski, Perrine
Noes: None.
Abstain: None.
Absent: None.
ITEM NO. 2
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMQQSSIOM NEETING OF JUNE 12, 1990
M 90-11 Public Hearing to consider the application of
(S 90-01) Mr. Deke Hunter, for approval of revisions to the
Hunter,D. Conditions of Approval co a previously approved Site
and Architectural approval allowing the remodel of an
existing shopping center on property located at
1.650-1800 South Bascam Avenue, in a C-2-S (General
Commercial) Zoning District.
STAFF RhCOffiMa2fl=1ON
That the Planning Commission take the following action:
1. ADOPT the attached findings and approve the applicant's
revised Site Plan, subject to the previously approved
Conditions of Approval with the modification to the
requirement for a perimeter sound wall as indicated in the
attached amended Condition of Approval.
BACKGROUND
The Planning Commission, at its meeting of April 24, 1990,
adopted Resolution No. 2671 approving the applicant's proposal to
expand and remodel the Hamilton Plaza Shopping Center. The
applicant at this time is requesting approval of a modification
to the fencing requirement for this project and approval of the
revised Site Plan indicating changes to the approved parking
layout, landscaping and conceptual stiiet improvements.
p�4iect Fencing: The previous Planning 7ommission approval of
this project required the construction o. an eight foot sound
wall alor-1 the easterly and southerly property lines of this
project. Conditions Nos. 24 and 25 of the previous approval
indicated the provision of phasing of the sound wall in
conjunction with the phasing of the shopping center remodel. The
applicant at this time is requesting approval of a six foot wall
along the easterly property line in lieu of the eight foot wall
previously required.
Site Plan Modifications: The applicant has submitted a revised
Site Plan which indicates that the portion of the parking area,
in front of the existing Long's Drug Store, would be remodelled
during Phr.se I of construction. This revision allows the
provision of additional parking spaces and requires the removal
of the ex'sting trees in the shopping center. The revised
conrapt, additiona'.ly, provides for a 17 foot planting area along
the street frontage where a 10 foit planting area was previously
proposed.
File No. N 90-11 (S 90-01)
Deke Hunter - 1650 - 1800 South Bascom Avenue
PC Ntg: 6/12/90
page 2
aM'W'ry of the Revised Site Plan: The summary of the revised
Site Plan indicates the following benefits:
a. Increase in the number of parking facilities from 699 stalls
to 726 stalls.
b. An increase in the amount of landscaping along the street
frontage of the project from 10 feet to 17 feet; and,.
C. Provision of a more desirable on -site circulation pattern,
incorporating islands throughout the parking area that are
aligned.
Negative jagA s: This revised plan, however, requires the
removal of the existing trees throughout the parking area. The
applicant has indicated a willingness to plant larger plant
materials in conjunction with this proposal and has added that
the perimeter landscapiny should compensate for the removal of
the existing mature vegetation. The remodel of the complete
parking area at one time will provide a more cohesive landscape
concept for this center.
staff finds the revised proposal provides adequate measures for
sound attenuation associated with the applicant'- project and
that the revised Site Plan provides a reasonable alternative to
the Site Plan previously approved by the Planning Commission and
is recommending approval.
Attachments:
1. Findings
2. Amended Conditions
3. Revised Site Plan - Phase I
4. Previous Site Plan - Phase I as approved by Planning Commission
5. Resolution No. 2671
Submitted by: / ��—
Tim J. H ey, PlVanner II
Approved by: Phil Stafford
Acting Planning Director
Ah Mh
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL FOR FILE NO. M 90-11 (S 90-01)
SITE ADDRESS: 1650 - 1800 SOUTH BASCOM AVENUE
APPLICANT: DEKE HUNTER
PC MTG: 6/12/90
1. The reduction in height of the proposed sound wall along the
easterly property line from 8 feet to 6 feet does not
significantly diminish the sound attenuation characteristic of
this wall.
2. The revised Site Plan provides an increase in the number of
parking stalls in Phase I from 699 to 726 stalls, increases the
amount of area to be landscaped and provides a mcre desirable
on -site circulation than that previously approved by the Planning
Commission on April 24, 1990.
MODIFIED CONLITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR FILE NO. M 90-11 (S 90-01)
STTL_XUDRESS: 1650 - 1800 SJUTH BASCOM AVENUE
APPLICANT: DEKE HUNTER
P.C. MTG. DATE: 6/12/90
The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that
he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with
the Ordinances of the City of Campbell. and the Laws of the State of
California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she
is required to comply with all applicable Codes and Ordinances of the
City of Campbell and the State of California, which pertain to this
dcvelopment and are not herein specified.
•• All conditions previously listed in the Planning corsission
Resolution No. 2671 are incorporated in this approval with the
exception of conditions 4,24, and 25, as follovs:
1, �Rgv's d Site Plan: Revised site plan indicating items per staff
comment sheet to be submitted to the Plarninc Department and
approved by the Planning Commission prior to application for a
Building Permit.
t. �nring/Landscaoing: Property to be fenced and landscaped as
indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Land capinq and fencing
shall be maintaired in accordance with the approved plans.
3. Tends^doe PlaZ�nd Lighting: .andscaping plan
: indicating type and
size of plant material, phased removal of existing trees, details of
pedestrian walkways, and location of irrigation system to be
submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning to
Commissior prier to issuance of a building permit. Lighting p
lan be approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee.
4, •+ Modified to read:
ggncina ;ra Wali_$7An: Apn1icarc shall submit a fencing and wall
plic fir approv,= of the Site and Architectural Review Committee,
pr.viAinq for the installation of a six foot precast wall along the
ees•.erly ,�roperty lino to be constructed in two phases and an eight
fort orec +� wall to be constructed between the adjacent residential
uses and tlio new retail building during Phase I, prior to issuance
of Buildino Permits.
5. Faith ful_per rorman;e Bond or A9reemerl%,: Applicant to either (1)
post a faithful performance bond in the amount OY $40,000 to ensure
landscap.'.ng, fencing, and striping if parking areas within 1 months
of completion 0f construction; or (2) file a written agreement to
complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond
or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to
application for a Building Permit.
6. Utility Box Screening: Applicant to submit a lette- to the Planning
Department, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer)
boxes, indicating the location
of the of the boxesPlannand
ng D screening
(if boxes
are a7ove ground) for 3pproval
7, g9of EguiOment 5mening: All mechanical equipment on roofs and all
utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director.
MODIFIED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR FILE NO. M 90-11 (S 90-01)
PC-RTG� June 12, 1990
1650 - 1880 S. Bascom
page 2
8. Building Occupancy/Pubic TmLrovements: Building occ_1ancy of the
new buildings will not be allowed until public improvements are
installed in accordance to phasing of public improvements.
9. Parking/Driveways: All parking and driveway areas to b, developed
in compliance with Chanter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code.
L11 parking spaces to t provided with appropriate concrete curbs or
bumper guards.
10. Underground Utilities: Underground utilities to be provided &s
required by Section 20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code.
11. Underground Utilities Connection: Plans submitted to the Building
Division for a plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all
connections for underground utilities including watei, sewer,
electric, telephone and television cables, etc.
12. Sign Applicatiop_: Sign application to 4e submitted in accordance
with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be
installed until application is approved and permit issued by the
Planning and Building Departments (Section 21.53 of the Campbell
Municipal Code). A comprehensive sign program should be submitted
and approved by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of
building permits.
13. Garbage Collection: Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal
code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of
refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits
of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal
Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings,
multiple apartment units; to all commercial, business, ;.ndustrial,
manufacturing, and construction establishments.
14. Trash :ontainer and Regvcle Area: Trash container(s) of a size and
quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in
area(s) approved by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be
constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the
trash enclosure area to service these containers. All screening to
be approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee.
15. Handicapped Requirements: Applicant shall comply with all
appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. Three
additions♦ spaces shall be added along the retail building frontage
as indicated on the redlined Exhibit phase I - Site Plan.
Public Works Denax-.@ejA
16. a-U& Duckouts: Provide two bus duckouts with cc,,rrete pads as
approved by City's Engineer in Phaae I.
MODIFIED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PC-1TIY.r June 12, 1990
File No. M 90-11 (S 90-01) - 1650 - 1880 S. Bascom
page 3
17. Encroachment Permit: Obtain an encroachment permit, pay fees, and
post surety for relocating driveways, constructing curb gutter and
sidewalks and for any otheL work required in the public
right-of-way.
18. Grading/Drainage Plans: Provide five sets of grading and drainage
plans for new building sites. Show how overall drainage of site
works, including alleyway.
19. Parking Adjustment: Adjust parking adjacent to bus duckout on
Bascom Avenue.
20. Parking Study: Provide support to show that reduced parking ratio
will be adequate to support proposed use.
Building Division
21. Pedestrian Walkway: A sidewalk should be added at the south entry
approach to keep the handicapped and pedestrians out of the drive
path of automobiles. It is also required in current handicapped
regulations.
Planning Department:
22. Site and Architectural Approval - Phase I and li:
a) Phase I construction to commence by February 1, 1991. Phase I
allows the remodel of theexisting shopping center and the
construction of 28,500 square feet of additional retail space.
b) Phase II construction to commence by February 1, 2998. Phase II
allows the remodel of the remainder of tie shopping center and the
construction of 7,600 square feet of additional retail space. The
completion of the landscaping improvements and reconfiguration of
the parking area.
23. Approved Exhibits: Site and Architectural Approval is granted to
remodel and add -on to the existing Hamilton Plaza Shopping Center,
as indicated on the exhibits approved by the Planning Commission on
April 24, 1990, as "redlined" to reflect approved :hanges. Said
approved exhibits are as follows:
- Site Plan - Phase I, as redlined, dated 4/24/90
- Site Plan - Phase II, dated 4/24/90
- Architectural Perspective
Preliminary Landscape Plan - Phase I, date, 4/18/90
Architectural Rendering, dated 1/4/90
Corner Retail Pad - Floor Plan
Corner Retail Pai - Elevations
0
IFIE, CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
P�� June 12, 1990
File No. M 90-11 (S 90-01) - 1650 - 1880 S. Bascom
page 3
- Retail Building, dated 3/16/90, Exhibit No. 5
Flcor Plan- Rear Retail Pad - Elevations I
- Elevation, dated 1/4/90, Exhibit tNo.lj16/90, Exhibit No. 6
24. **Deleted.
25. **Deleted
26. nellve� rv��"`a' "•- `- --
Deliveries to the p.m.
ice dailareaThealoadinged dock area shall be postfed
of 7 a.m., and 7 p. y owner
to inform drivers of the restriction. The applicant/property,
shall assume full responsibility for enforcement of this condition.
HUNTER PROPERTIFS
207e5 VAEEEv GREEn DRIVE
RSUN F :00
�t O C� 950:♦
V�OB: 211 �,00
JUN p 5 1990
June 5, 1990 � W� �W
Mr. Tim Haley
Planning Department
City of Campbell
70 Nortb First Street
Campbell, California 95008
Re: Hamilton Plaza
Campbell, California
Dear Tim:
Pursuant to our acquisition of the above referenced
property, I need to request a zoning compliance letter.
The purpose of this letter is to appease my lender, Aetna
Realty Investors, that the property is zoned to allow the current
uses. I would appreciate a timely issuance of the letter, since
it is a requirement to close escrow. our intended close of
escrow is June 14, 1990.
Thank you for your cooperation with this matter.
Sincerely yours
Deke Hunter,
DHJ/ls
1 1 1 1 \JI 1 VL✓LIV!-I 1 1%JI V
�tl 4�.� a�ct•cu�•it.���
750 RIDDER PARK DRIVE
SAN JOSE. CALIFORNIA 95190
IN THE
CITY OF CAMPBELL.
................................................
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAW A CLARA
City of Campbell
75 North Central Avenue
.....».............».........».«................................»........................................................
Campbell, CA 95008
NOTICE OF HEARINGS
'TATE OF CALIFORNIA.
:OLINTY OF SANTA CLARA
Tn• elpwaVne4 hwq hal GW a ern OePM arN Yri: TT.t a' a mw tera.l.� to,v r�ilemeO SITM
! t1Y Y • tl1¢an a M t•[aw 61a1•., o.w M .Ve a •ipniwn Y— an0 rot • Wy,
>Tr• .Maw pau•O^p[: arb •+[ at arW OvIp a Yb One[ •rro [Ii Y trr pnelpb U•r4 a M .7 .�
,da son w Y.e C—y a S«+a a«. s .,. a c..�oa.Y 1N Y1N :an JW MwcMy'aN•�+S "rnii
N I+rea ,wM r.,.rt1:-nG . n•.Tp.pw of 0-1 dra,tal,m .[ 1-1 .«.., Y peI— Oy Swlbrl. 60W .r1e
awnrq d M eMn^�wN COG• d IM Sun d �[Ie waM1. I --d Dy Yvl ••cliorl.. k WYtM [Yr
nt [w� 0 1•I.pr.pNe n[.[ • ax • perw^ aur.aw, le.•9 •eon• ae.
aadlp�on 41 a YY^V Ybcrbn, arq Y rol Ga+aM Io In• btwest. a WIIYeO lar in. •n4n.Man1 a
en a • p.noa.r a... nawen[ eaw. u4rp..«. > er..r.atwn e a M a.•n I •r�.t
alrts.+on a arry renew d Y,ctl a.ta•a a. u . uupY Or G•r,mil.liO+: MI N N ImN
tiG nwlpapw N• O•an NlaeWeO, praua aPn M "u YYJ btY a San JOY b aatl Cn^Iy aro Sl.0
rapMl MMY W no• eon 1>M year p•caMo Ief h[I [.ud• Ion a IM roli• MNn mwGbMG. Y+l
au wY aH ^ Iyla na •rraaw 1Nn rc^v,A•nG w•s p•ceOeO wan I.aO. p'ra.d Yr rl ela[itau Iypa rot
.w le•n e.[p«N. ONCGWq aM a.eawq ^ pwnral twrM. Itn pvpet arW ceu•clw d Iti rota
nwaeG Io a V'^'[ —1 Iti O[ppt^0 a —h Y .rw..G a • I,ue 0^nuG cal%/, ra. Waa[I.O w FNNa„
.O r'MO.Dw On In• lc--o .— I—:
May 30, 1990
san b . taeorn.
4thlone_..Ia....4Q._..._......_................_.._..
rK__......_._._.....................ara..__...:....._._..............._ _.
... .. Mlw M W Y w •rd [erect.
i G.aw• I^e. onta•1 • wMr •vso 1
_ :,G.-.- ............ _... ....... .... ...
v+eww a tti sat xY u«:w [,•..
,YJ-�
r�
city Ol eamp%e��
Np= OF s
1�
a �c arMi..a".a"i• a
a�wY••r. m i.a•aaY. Jae
iA �, to M CY1 Ir[• Ca.e• OwIMY 10
•.awn
I callaaw M ..ou[ ^tom
ro M�iw•noM�a ae[•IYq aM�•p[[ryY
an.w. on InowM w�•Ya'q �tp
sww e.or„ awr Y . ua lanwa
�,�,ya t Onllkf NM 1•►t1o6t.
64.�
t ca+aw M aY4eae^ a lan Eaa• h•4
a. cam+i u[. rYN 4� ��ya�• F�a•anl.l•i�[
Yneo K iw�y 0Y'kP lyJ'. .I01.Ot•
ry�r[e Wwpw•w �o �E.w.Pa.
•weplar YrG,a •ww
Ir•eG ptt•�i•M,G[YWM Oa•w�a•th
rrY• a rn a M atb+a Pael.[�tetr,n ry a
•o�nnaore�•,..brY•G a M Pal[ rn/M
G•.eq«t b M mR , a M wMn Mataer.
Gwc• M.w•G b M CJIY a Cw•paYp1N[ toae..1
QI�aO"�wab Mpa.rOgO�raL�
llgyl.0
v wocommammo".
AmmLL
r /
[� S 199C
CITY OF
-LA,.NING OLAMi+�`L`
E P.•1.,-ENT
CITY OF CAMPBELL
7 0 N O R T H F I R S' S T R E E T
CAMP BELL, C A L I F 0 R N IA 95006
( 4 0 8 ) 8 6 6 - 2 1 0 0
FAX N (408) 379-2572
Planning May 9, 1990
Department
Mr. Deke Hunter
Hunter Properties
20725 Valley Green Drive, Suite 100
Cupertino, CA 95014
Re: S 90-01 - 1650 - 1800 South Bascom Avenue
Dear Mr. Hunter:
Please be advised that the Planning commission, at its meeting of April
24, 1990, adopted Resolution No. 2671, approving your request to expand
and remodel the shopping center on the referenced property. A copy of
the resolution and redlined plans are enclosed.
The Planning Department is in receipt of your letter, dated May 7, 1990,
wherein you request amendments to the adopted Condition of Approval.
This request may be processed as a modification to the Commission's Site
And Architectural Approval.
If you should have any questions regarding this approval or the
modification process, please do not hesitate to contact the Planning
Department at (408) 866-2140.
sincerely,
Tim H3Iey`�="'a'
Planner II
ks
cc: Building Division
Fire Department
Public Works Department
Hagman Group
Apperallat N
Notice of Deter inatio..
CITY OF CAMPBELL
70 NORTH FIRST STREET
CAM P6ELL. CALIFORNIA 95008
City of Campbell
To: Office of Planning and Research
from:
Pleiming Department
_
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121
70 North First Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
Campbell, CA 95008
\
County Clerk's office
Santa Clara County
191 North First Street
San Jose, CA 95113
Subject.
Filing of Notice of Determination In compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the P.rbllc Resources Code.
S QO-01(36,100 sq. ft. addition to existinq shop inq center)
Proied Title
Tim Haley _ (408) aFF 71 Ar
Lead Age, Area Code/Rkpharte/Eztension
Slate Clearinghouse Number Contwt Person
(If wttmimd to Glearinahwre)
1650 1800 S Racrnm AvP_
Project Location (include county)
project Description: ;ite and Architectural Approval to allow the expansion of an
existinq shoppinq center. Approximately 36,000 sq. ft. \
has approved the above descried project on
This is to advise than the xa—r 0Re,pmi1bk aa�. ;_
ADr i 1 28 199 n and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project`\ a
(D-)
1. The project [❑wr8 will notl have a significant effect on the environment
was for this project pursuant to d.e provisiom of CEQA\rn\ \
2. ❑ An Fitvironment%J Impact Report prepared visions of CEQA. e y.
Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuan m the pro _ 333
3. Ivtitigation measures Owe" Vert trot) made a condition of the approval of the pro)ect. —
4. A statement of Overridiag Considerations (Owas E�s+as not) adopted for tlti. project -
�!
5. Firidmgs lL7^�re ❑wart not made pursuara to the povisicm of CEQA.
This is to certify that the final EIR with conimint� and responses and record of project approval is aviubble to the General Public at:
Talt
Sf�eerra (Pu Yc _ )
Dee received for flllell at OPR
Rtv.ra� Otbear lace
HUNTER PROPERTIES
20725 VALLEY GREEN DRIVE
SUITE w0
C-RTINO CA 95014
- 255 A100
May 7, 1990
Mr. Steve PlasecKi
Director of Planning
City of Campbell
70 North First Street
Campbell, CA 95008
Re: Hamilton Plaza
Resolution #2671
Dear Steve:
Pursuant to the above captioned resolution I would like to
amend four of the conditions. The condition3 that will need to
be amended are as follows:
#4: The sound wall at six (6) feet will provide adequate
protection to the first floor residential tenants. The
sound wall should only extend the length of the project
impacted in phase 1.
#10: 1'.iderground utilities applies to new construction.
#20: The parking study has been completed and accepted.
#23: The preliminary landscape plan should be modified to allow
for a minimum 24' lane width adjacent to the Bascom Avenue
bus duckout.
It is my intention to address the final '.andscape plan (tree
removal) and sign criteria with the Planning :;ommission at tho
first meeting in Jui,-3. Please direct me as to how we should
address these requested amendments.
Sincerely your ,
e • !` t•r, J
DHJ'ls
cc: Bill Hagman
AdhL Ah
HIiNTF.R PROPERTIES
190L TIE -AMED.
S TE l
54N'—E c• 95126
140e1 21e :boo
MEMORANDUM
To City of Campbell
Date April 27, 1990
70 North First Street project NamEHamilton & Bascom
Campbell, CA 95008
Ann Mr, Tim Haley
Re Revised Conditions of Approval
Memo Pursuant to our meeting wednesday, please prepare the
revised conditions of approval and exhibits for my review.
The appeal periud expires May 4, 1990.
Please call mThankoffice
youwhen
for your cooperation aterial is r
cooperationwith thisoady so
can
pick it up.
matter.
Dr�r'f�pMf���
III` ANP, . U j II
CITY Of
BY Deke Hunter, Jr. ar ^v','.•
DCP.,.z
cc Bill Hagman
CITY Of CAMPBELL
7 0 N C R T H F I R S T S T R E E T
CAMPY ELL, CAL IFORN iA 95008
(408) 866-2100
F%X • (408) 379-2572
Department: Planning
DECLARATION THAT AN ENVIRONAENTAI
IDIpACf REPORT IS NOT REQUIRED
(NEGATIVE DECLARATION)
APPLICANT Deke Hunter - Hunter Properties
ADDRESS 1900 The Alamenda, Sutie No. 606
San Jose, CA 95126
FILE NO. S 90-01
SITE ADDRESS 1650-1800 South Bascom Avenue
Campbell, CA 95008
Pursuant to the applicable sections of the California L vironmental
Quality Act of 19 0 and City of Campbell Resolution No. S164; and
After review of plans and information supplied by the applicant
pertaining to the captioned project, and after completing the
attached initial study, the undersigned does hereby determine
that the captioned project will have no
significant effect (no
substantial adverse impact) on the environment within the tents
and meaning of said Act and Resolution.
Executed at Campbell, California this 25th day of April , 1990 .
Steve Piasecki
HAMILTON PLAZA PARKING
EXISnNGCENTER PHASE I
PHASE II
RETAIL RETAIL
RETAIL
#r RATIO 1 N RATIO 1
N1 RATIO 1
EXISTING 626 1/187
ORDINANCE 588 1/200 731 1/200
769 11200
PROPOSED 709 1/210
711 1/209
CONSULTANT 640 1/226
680 1/227
SERVICE USE PROVIDED AT 1/350 (9500/350)- 27 SPACES
AUTO
coda: ham/plaza Parking
CITY OF 1650-1800 S. BASCOM S-90-01 3/5
CAMPBELL
NORMALLY ACCEPTAPLE
EXTERIOR LEVELS'
Time Fer od
07U0 _ 2100 nrs. 3210o - 0700 hrs.
Exno .0 �� 5
60
L1O 55 45
L50
• mitigation measures are required.
For acceptable interior ievels in sleeoing spaces. the
following HUD/FHA stanlards are considered satisfactory
en lindo,,
and are recommended'o v1i55on isa ma ded assume D forproperventil3t"o
conditions unless D
by mechanical means such as air-conditioningJectedAt t noise pre
sent time HUD/FHA considers existing
and exposures in sleeping quarters acceptable if the total
noise levels from exterior and interior SLurces meets
the following standards.
6learly Acr".: able literio
r Levels
1. Do not exceed 55 dBA for more than an
accumulation of 60 inutes in any 24
hour period, and
2. Do not exceed 45 dBA rc^ more than an
accumulation of 6 hours in any 24 hour
day, and
1 0, not exceed 45 dBA for more than an
accumulation of 30 minutes duringthehe
nighttime hours from 11:00 P•
m. 7:00 a.m-
dw
Item #2
Hunter Properties
CITY (OF C.AMPBELL
70 NORTIi FIRST S T R E E T
CAMPBELL, CAL IFORN IA 95008
(408) 866-2100
FAX a (108) 379-2572
Department Planning
DECLARATION THAT AN KWIRONONIAL
IMPACT REPORT IS NOT REQUIRED
(NEGATTVE DECLARATION)
APPLICANT Deke Hunter - Hunter Properties
ADDRESS 1900 The Alamenda, Sutie No. 606
San Jose, CA 95126
FILE NO. S 90-01
SITE ADDRFSS 1650-1800 South Bascom Avenue
Campbell, CA 95008
Pursuant to the apppplicable sections of the California Enviroranental
Quality Act of 1970 and City of Campbell Resolution No. 5164; and
After raview of plans and information supplied by the applicant
pertaining to the captioned project, and aFter completing the
attached initial study, the undersigned does hereby determine
that the captioned project will have no significant effec' (no
substantial adverse impact) on the environment within the terms
and meaning of said Act and Resolution.
Executed at Campbell, California this 25th day of April , 1990 .
Steve Piasecki
1�
B-96- 4/21/81 Oft
NOTICE TO APPLICANTS
REGARDING EFFECT OF WASTEWATER
TREATMENT CAPACITY ON LANND7
DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL 288 RSU. TO
DEVELOPMENT OF APN
288-11-I/2/3/4/5
Please take notice that no vested right to a building permit
-.;hall accrue as the result of the granting of a:iy land development
approvals and applications. Pursuant to the adoption of Ordinance
9.045 by County Santitation District No. 4 of Santa Clara County,
the agency providing the abo— described parcel(s) with sewer
service, if the District's Manager and Engineer makes a deter-
mination that the issuance of a sewer connection permit to a
building, or proposed building, on the above described property,
will, in his opinion, cause the District to exceed its ability
to treat adequately the wastewater that would result from the
issuance of such connection permit, then said permit may not
be issued, and, hen e, no building permit may be issued by
this agency.
If the sewer connection permit is issued, it may contain
substantive conditions designed to decrease the wastewater
associated with any land use approval.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
By signing below, the applicant acknowledges, at the time
of application, that he/she fully understands Se above.
pp ica t' ignatu
> 1650-1750 S. Bas
Site Address of Propos
Development
Distribution:
Original to County sanitation District No. 4
100 E. Sunnyoaks Ave., Campbell, CA
Copy to issuing City, Town or County Campbell Planning Dept.
Copy to Applicant File N aJ 'To -Of
i. As
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting of April 7U,
Page 2
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
2. S 90-01 Continued Public Hearing to consider the
Hunter Prop. application of Mr. Deke Hunter, on behalf of Hunter
Properties, for app:ovel of a Site and Architectural
Application to allow the remodel and expansion of an
existing shopping center, on properties known as
1650 - 1800 South Bascem Avenue, in a C-2-S general
commercial Zoning District. (Planning Commission
action final, unless appealed.)
Staff Presentation: Director Piase.cki presented Staff Report and
reviewed the four related communication items on this application.
Comm. Alne was concerned with the noise level that would be generated
by the new remodel to the residents on the East side of the property.
Even though the 8 ft. wall would help the residents on first floor
occupancy, the second -story residents would not benefit. Director
Piasecki noted that it would be difficult to isolate the noise
completely.
Regarding handicap parking, Comm. Christ noted he would like to see a
space for each retailer. There are presently 12 tenants and 9 handicap
spaces.
Site and Architectural Review of 4/17190 Comm. Tlne reported the
Committee was generally supportive of the applicant's proposal. They
did request that the applicant attempt to retain as many of the
existing trees on -site as possible, providing a phased landscaping
approach to relandscaping the shopping center.
The Committee was additionally in agreement to the applicant's request
to provide an alternative street improvement proposal along the
southerly portion of the property wherein a monolithic sidewalk and a
landscape area to the rear of that sidewalk would be provided versus
the parkway separated sidewalk landscape concept previously proposed
for this area.
PLANNING COFmISSION MINJTES
Regular Meeting of April 28, 1990
Page 3 _ _---------
Public Hearing - S 90-01 (Con't )
n _ �..r� presentation: At the hearing of April 10, 1990, the
address certain issues. As a result,
Commission had asked applicant to
he reviewed the following, including revised plans:
1. Phase I Site Plan
2. Phase II Site Plan
3, Existing Landscape and Light Standards
q, Phase I Landscape Plan
5. Phase II Landscape Plan
6. Deceleration Lanes and Bus Duckout
7, Handicap Spaces and Stop Siqns
8. Textured Paving
9. Shopping Cart_ Areas and Pay Phones
10. Robway Pedestrian Access
11. Trash Enclosures
12. Compact Cars
13. Landscape in Front of 9uildina
14. Siqn Program
15. Phase I Elevation
comm. O-szewski was conc,._ned that develop,. was removirn;/replacing
uld be
existing trees mainly so th�r, the fro;its Of tt: viny1ine trees match
better seen. Applicant stated it was PO, -,'.Of
:�avin�
the "new" look that the center would be going thr:u-ih and they were
willing to plant now and replant, if necessary, during Phascentern
order to keep the landscaping in keeping with the shopp.ng
en
Comm. a ex was gconcerned
sidewalkhat the hethe north)cwasebeing raduc-da Yearstorestore
and the existing
applicant indicated that this was not the case and that the driveway
width remained unchanged.
Comm. Alne commented commented he was concerned
Christabout thecenterwinq:
safety issue previously raised by
it (why had
entrance from Bascom and cars backing out onto
applicant only created barrier for first 2 - 3 rows and not
all the way to store fronts;
power pole removal on Hamilton.
Applicant stated they
cessary
creating barrier. all :he way to store -fronts not ne-
drivers break off in either direction before then, and they
also introduced speed controlling element - bomanite - at this
point;
removal of power poles had not become necessary.
• ,M$
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting of April. 28, 1990
Page 4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Hearing - S 90-01 (Con't.)
There was lenghty discussion as to what trees would be planted when and
where. How would second phase landscaping line up with Phase I aisles?
Would some trees have to be planted twice? Would the goal of not
"denuding" be achieved? Applicant did state they would be replanting
some areas in Phase II that they had planted in Phase I.
Comm. Christ made the suggestion to replace thr trees in Phase I that
need to be replaced in Phase I, and replace the trees in Phase II that
need to be replaced in Phase II. New trees in new centers enhance the
newness of a canter. Landscaping along the building needs to be
addressed. Applicant. reaffirmed new trees would be brought in to
compliment the center, and where the sidewalk would be extended, new
trees will be placed there, also. All would have proper irrigation and
maintenance. Applicant also would replace the 4 trees currently in
front of Pay and Pak to tie the project together.
In answer to Comm. Christ's time frame re signage program, applicant
suggested he not be granted a Building Permit until he has a time frame
set up. This could be a Condition of Approval.
The Public Hearing was then opened.
Mr. Ray Clark, 325 April Way, Campbell, had concerns as follows:
Service road in rear of cancer off Bascom - would it be one-way or
two-way and would there be a pedestrian conflict?
Robway pedestrian area - would it be lighted?
Wall - would like to see it completed in Pnase I.
Speed control elements within the shopping area.
Trash enclosure for new retail store.
Would the licht poles on Bascom be moved.
There were no other speakers.
NOTION: Comm. Alne moved to close tiie Public Hearing.
SECOND: Comm. Pox
VOTE: Passed.
Commission 215CUssion
Comm. Olszewski wanted clarification as to what exactly will be done in
Phases I as the plans and details must be part cf the Conditions now so
that there are no future ramifications.
Director Piasecki made the following clarifications:
The exhibits the Commissioners received in their packets marked
Phase I and Phase II and as red -lined on the board at this meting
would be the plans being voted on. The parking row next to the
Campisi access would be modified to a 75 degree angle, and
completed in Phase I. In Phase II, the existing parking in the
center entrance would become modified.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting of April 28, 1990
Page 5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Public Hearing - s 90-01 (Con't.)
Comm. Olszewski continued with his concerns:
Traffic controls within the center would take place and their
location. Dir. Piasecki noted on the plans exactly where the stop
signs would be located and were red -lined for further
clarification. Mr. Helms also confirmed that bomanite does
accomplish slowing down of traffic. Comm. Christ noted the bumps
used in other shopping centers are quite effective and perhaps
these would be more effective than stop signs, which some shoppers
do not adhere to.
Shopping Cart Area - is not the best - suggested move closer to
middle of parking lot
Pedestrian access to Robway and landscaping thereof. Wanted clear
definition of whose respor—ibility this would be. Mr. Helms
answered this was a public street and would be addressed
accordingly. The landscaping could be made a condition with the
appropriate findings.
Trash enclosures were not clearly defined, Director Piasecki noted
the red -lining on the plan was hypothetical and when the final Site
Plans that applicant had to bring back to the Commission, any
accessible location could be defined.
Landscaping. Dir. Piasecki commented that all landscaping issues
would be reviewed again by the Commission prior to building permits
being issued; this evening's application was for approval for
basic site plan and ttasic landscape concept.
Sound wall needs to be extended up to the end of residential
area.
Trees - what methodology would be used - those discussed were not
satisfactory. Comm. Fox noted that the 20 elms must be removed
eventually as this species has been quarantined by the County of
Santa Clara.
Comm. Christ raised concern of parking/lands--ape issues between phases
to which Dir. Piasecki commented that by angling the parking to a 75
degree angle by striping, the landscaping islands would not be affected
and the results would still accommodate parking, 7' walk and 10'
parkway.
• 0
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting of April 28, 1990
Page 6 ___ __
-------------------
Public Hearing S 90-01 (Con't.)
In answer to Comm. Alne's concern regarding a possible continuance to
the next meeting having applicant bring back a more concrete plan
-lining that had taken place at this
incorporating all the comments/red
meeting, Dir. Piasecki reviewed not only the red -lined plans but
additional renderings 14 and 115 (landscaping and elevations) which he
suggested be made part of the approved plans for this site.
Reqarding noise element issue, Comm.
Alsecdid nottsee hleveesidents in
the adjoining properties living
on the benefit from the 8' proposed wall. Dir. PiasecKi noted the Generai
Plan Normally Acceptable Exterior Levels was a guide and the best that
can be done within reason and is a significant improvement over the
present.
MOTION Comm. Christ moved to approve application per staff
recommendations and as Indicated oiseionandnvithlthe ans which
th
were presented to the Pas pingented by Staff and as amended at
Conditions of Approval as et with Exhibits 14 a d /5
the Planning Commission meeting o
being included as part of the approval.
SECOND romm. Fox
VOTE; 6-0-1-0
r • +
ITEM NO. 2
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMUSSION MERTING OF APRIL 24, 1990
S 90-01 Continued Public Hearing to consider the
Hunter Properties applichlf of
Hunter aPr Properties, for tion of Mr. eapproval of aHunter, on eSite and
Architectural Application and to allow the
remodel and expansion of an existing shopping
^enter, on properties known as 1650-1800 South
B..scom Avenue, in a C-2-S (General Commercial)
Zoning District.
STAFF PRCOMMMUATION
that the Planning Commission take the following actions:
1. GRANT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION for this project.
2. ADOPT a resolution incorporating the attached findings,
approving this project, subject to the Conditions of
Approval.
BACEGMM
This application was continued from the previous Planning
commission meeting of April 10, 1990, so that the applicant
could submit revised plans addressing the following major
issues and the issues outlined in the attached minutes:
1. The review of on -site circulation to provide improved
ingress and egress movements on the site.
2. Provision of additional pavement treatment on the site to
help reduce vehicular speed on on -site driveways.
3. The provision of additional on -site pedestrian walkways.
4. The provision of bus duckouts and deceleration lanes.
5. A review of the retention of existing trees where
possible.
6. The provision of cart collection and recycle goods;
collection areas.
7. Clarification of the phasing of street improvements during
phase 1 and phase 2 of the project.
APPLICre a PROPO
The applicanStAL
seeks approval of the Site and Architectural
application to allow the expansion and remodel of the existing
shopping center located on the southeast corner of liamilton an
Bascom Avenues on the 12.3 net acre site. The applicant's
proposal is to remodel and expand the shopping center in two
phases. Phase 1 includes t,,e remodel of the majority of the
shopping center and expansion of approximately 28,500 square
feet of retail area. Phase 2 proposes a 7600 square foot
retail addition.
Staff Report for S 90-01 -2- April 24, 1990
Revised Plans Submittal: The appiirant has submitted a revised
Site Plan for the project addressing the iss!xes previously
raised by the Planning Commission. The applicant's proposal is
for similar building sizes, locations, and designs as
previously presented to the Planning Commission and represents
the following changes:
1. The elimination of 5 parking spaces adjacent to the center
driveway of the development and the provision of landscape
areas at this location to improve on -site circulation.
2. The provision of a walkway landscape element along the
building frontage at the center of the project.
Staff is recommending that further detailing of this area
be provided with submittal of the landscaping p:.an for the
project.
3. An indication of the trash enclosure locations throughout
the project. Staff is recommending further detail of
screening.
4. The provision of an eight foot sound wall adjacent to the
new retail structure at the southeas_ corner of the site
and the provision o. a noise study addressing tM need for
a sound wall along the rear portion of the site. Staff is
recommending a so -and wall along all residential
properties.
5. The introduction of additional pavement treatment.
throughout the project to help reduce vehicular speeds
through the project site.
RECO?Q[ UMION/aIRRIARY
Staff finds the proposal is consistent with the General Plan
and Zoning and that the presented plans with the imposed
conditions provides an acceptable upgrade and expansion of the
shopping center Staff is recommending conditions of approval
which require the approval of revised plans addressing the
following concerns:
1. The prcvision of an alternative street improvement concept
for the fill frontage of the site providing bus duckouts,
deceleration lanes and landscape concept along the street
frontage.
2. The provision sound walls along the perimeters along the
property where it abuts adjacent residential uses unless
the sound study supports elimination of such walls and is
considered acceptable by the Site and Architectural Review
Committee.
3. That the landscaping plans for the project provide a more
substantial detail of the pedestrian walkway area from
Robway Avenue and the landscape walkway area along the
frontage of the commercial uses towards the center of the
project.
4. That the applicant submit revised elevations of the phase
two retail addition, and
Staff Report for S 90-01 -3- April 24, 1990
That the applicant submit a prcposal for screening of
trash enclosures for approval of the Planning Director.
Atta ^hments•
1. V Findings
2. Conditions
3. Previous Planning Commission minutes
4. Reduced Site Plans
5. Previous Staff Comment Sheet 11
Submitted. by: Tim J. Haley pk}i
Planner II '
Approved by: Steve Piasecki
Planning Director
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF FILE NO. S 90-01
SITE ADDRESS: 1650-1800 S. BASCOM
APPLICANT: HUNTER PP.OPERTIES
PC MEETING DATE: APRIL 24, 1990
1. Scams
The proposed project is an appropriate scale in
relationship to the adjacent developed uses.
2 pesian: The project is well designed and architecturaliy
blends into the neighborhood The remodeled buildings are a•i
improvement.
3, Parking: Provided parking ratio of 1:210 for retail uses is
considered acceptable due to the size of shopping center,
accessibility to public transit and provision of pedestrian
walkways.
4. rompam tibilitY: The project is designed to minimize
infringement on neighboring properties with the addition of
screen walls.
5, �andscaoina: Substantial landscaping has been provided which
adds to the aesthetics of the project with the introduction of
ree wells and street frontage landscaping.
6 onditic+ns: The project. subject to the conditions imposed,
will be •_onsistent with the General Plan; and,
7 Harmony: The proposed project, subject to the required
conditions, will aid in the harmonious development of the
immediate area.
A /-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR FILE NO. S 90-01
SITE ADDRESS: 1650-1880 SOUTH BASCOM AVENUE
APPLICANT: HUNTER PROPERTIES
P.C. MTG. DATE: APRIL 24, 1990
The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that
he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with
the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of
California. :.dditionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she
is required to comply with all applicable Codes ar.d Ordinances of the
City of Campbell and the State of California, which pertain to this
de,.elopment and are not herein specified.
1, $gviged Site Plan: Revised site plan indicati:g items per staff
comment sheet to be submitted to the Planning Department and
approved by the Sita and Architecturar Review Committee prior to
application for a Building Permit.
2, F nr'n�i�anascaoi.ng: Property to be fenced and landscaped as
indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing
shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans.
3. - ^^aoe Pan and Lighting: Landscaping plan indicating type and
size of plant material, phased removal of existing trees, details of
Pedestrian walkways, and location of irrigation system to be
submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and
Architectural Review Committee prior to issuance of a building
permit. Lighting plan to be approved by the Site and Architectural
Review Committee.
4. Fencing and Wall Plan: Fencing plan indicating location and design
detail of sound wall to be submitted to the Planning Department and
approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. Sound wall
to be a minimum of 8 feet in height along all residential property
lines unless a sound study supporting a lesser wall io presented and
acceptable to the Site ano Architectural Review Committee.
5. Faithful Performance Bond or Agreement: Applicant to either (1)
post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $40,000 to ensure
landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months
of completion of construction; or (2) file a written agreement to
complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond
or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to
application for a Building Permit.
6, Utility Box Screening: Applicant to submita letter to the Planning
Department, prior to installation of PG&E utility ,transformer)
boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if boxes
are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director.
7. Roof Eauioment Screening: All mechanical equipment on roofs and all
utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director.
8. Builjfng Occuoancv/Pub�,ic ImorovemeDS�: '3uilding occupancy of the
new buildings will not be allowed rntil public improvements are
installed in accordance to phasing of public improvements.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR FILE NO. S 90-01
SITE ADDRESS: 1650-1880 SOUT- BASCOM AVENUE
APPLICANT: HUNTER PROPERTIES
P.C. MTG. DATE: APRIL 24, 1990
page 2
�, n Yina/Driveways: _All parking and driveway areas to be developed
in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code.
All parking spaces to be provided with appropr-ate concrete curbs or
bumper guards.
10. n.,aeraround Utilities: Underground utilities to be provided as
required by Section 20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code.
11. ' "* lilies Connection: Plans submitted to the Building
Division for a plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all
connections for underground utilities including water, sewer,
electric, telephone and television cables, etc.
12.+on ADD"cation• Sign application to be submitted in accordance
with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be
installed until application is approved and permit issued by the
Planning and Building Departments (Section 21.53 of the Campbell
Municipal Code).
13. ^'rbaae Co>>e^lion: Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal
Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of
refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits
of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal
Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings,
multiple aartment units: tomanufacturing, and construction lest blishmentsusiness, industrial,
14. Trash Container and Recycle Area: Trash container(s) of a site and
quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in
areas) approved by the Fire Departme.it. All enclosures to be
constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the
trash nlosurearea
alto service
ing these containers. All screening to
be approvedY the
15. Handicaope� aorements: Applicant shall comply with all
appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped.
Public Works Department
16. Bua Duckouts: Provide two bus duckouts with concrete pads as
approved by city's Engineer in Phase I.
ment Obtain an encroachment permit,
17. Encroachment
Pew: pay fees, and
post a for relocating driveways, constructing curb gutter and
sidewalks and for any other work required in the public
right-of-way.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR FILE NO. S 90-01
SITE ADDRESS: 1650-1880 SOUTH BASCOM AVENUE
APPLICANT: HUNTER PROPERTIES
P.C. MTG. DATE: APRIL 24, 1990
page 3
is. rradina/Drainaae plans: Provide five sets of grading and drainage
plans for new building sites. Show how overall drainage of site
works, including alleyway.
19. c -tiing Adiustme Adjust parking adjacent to bus duckout on
Bascom Avenue.
20. Parking Studv: Provide support to show that reduced parking ratio
will be adequate to support proposed use.
Building Division
L1. o n Irian Walkway: A sidewalk should be added at the south entry
approach to keep the handicapped and pedestrians out of the drive
path of automobiles. It is also required in current handicapped
regulations.
Planning nnArtment:
22 Site ^^r r Aonroval - Phase I and II:
a) Phase I construction to commence by February 1, 1991. Phase I
allows the remodel of the existing shopping center and the
construction of 28,500 square feet of additional retail space. This
phase requires reconstruction of sidewalks and curbing along the
complete with
frontage ofial n of he
Bascom
Avenue frontage.
b) Phase II construction to commence by February 1, 1998. Phase II
allows the remodel of the remainder of the shopping center and the
construction of 7,bOO squareretail space.
completion of the landscapingfimprovements iandlreconfiguration ofe
the parking area.
23. Aooroved Exhibits: Site and Architectural Approval is granted to
remodel and add -on to existing Hamilton Plaza Shopping Center, as
indicated on the exhibits approved by the Planning Commission on
9
April 24, 190, as "redlined^ to reflect approved changes.
• • a
" CTACHMENT NO. 4
�3M� f f�3 t Adopted on Ap 1 24. 1990
by Resolution No. 2671
515,
WMAV b✓i ice' ,' - 6 ¢
S liln�v4+aou TnTW111111111
I .
Psiv
r
ti c
x
A, 40% `.
s
f Y
BASQ0M AVE"
N10lCT DATA - NUJ! 1
•�•• FlMM 1 - Mid /uM
BASCOM; & HAMILTON CENTER
CAMpBELL CALFORMA
��v+r
�• N••4• HUNTER PROPERTIES
BASCOM, AVENUE
rrarcr DATA - NOW r
RA$COM` HAMILTON CENTER
CAMPBELL. CALFORMA
MINTER PROPER1*9
rrAw r - rrtr Darr
lb
0
- BASCOM AVENUE
•
�xwtM� r�nvnwr�aw� ruu
BASCOW &. HAMILTONLCENTECAMPBER
se"Im A
HUNTER PROPERTIES �,
t
z
O
at
.1
m> " m x
ROBWAY AVENUE
Ln
cn
z�
= O�05 � tmA
m -4 0
zv '° p 7D a
Dw •
* Cz z
_ D p 0 pt
�➢ D z
r cg
n O
m
�_
j (� a
2 Z - ��° O
'4 O SG c d
Z m
H
7. 9 ti
z
_% t •
ATTACHMENT 4
staff Report for S 90-01 -2- April 24, 1990
Revised Plans Submittal: The applicant has submitted a revised
Site Plan for the project addressing the issues previously
raised by the Planning Commission. The applicant's proposal is
for similar building sizes, locations, and designs as
previously presented to the Planning Commission and represents
the following changes:
1. The elimination of 5 parking spaces adjacent to the center
driveway of the development and the provision of landscape
areas at this location to improve on -site circulation.
2. The provision of a walkway landscape element along the
building frontage at the center of the project.
Staff is recommending that further detailing of this area
be provided with submittal of the landscaping plan for the
project.
3. An indication of the trash enclosure locations throughout
the project. Staff is recommending further detail of
screening.
4. The provision of an eight foot sound wall adjacent to the
new retail structure at the southeast corner of the site
and the provision of a noise study addressing the need for
a sound wall along the rear portion of the site. Staff is
recommending a sound wall along all residential
properties.
5. The introduction of additional pavement treatment
throughout the project to help reduce vehicular speeds
through the project site.
Staff finds the proposal is consistent with the General Plan
and Zoning and that the presented plans with the imposed
zonditions provides an acceptable upgrade and expansion of the
shopping center Staff is recommending conditions of approval
which require the approval of revised plans addressing the
followinv concerns:
1. The provision of an alternative street improvement concept
for the full frontage of the site providing bus duckouts,
deceleration lanes and landscape concept along the street
frontage.
2. The provision sound walls along the perimeters along the
property where it abuts adjacent residential uses unless
the sound study supports elimination of such walls and is
considered acceptable by the Site and Architectural Review
Committee.
3. That the landscaping plans for the project provide a more
substantial detail of the pedestrian walkway area from
Robway Avenue and the landscape walkway area along the
frontage of the commercial uses towards the center of the
project.
4. That the applicant submit revised elevations of the phase
two retail addition, and
•0
caff Report for S 90-01
ng 01
That the applicant submit a proposal -or scraanDirector.
trash enclosures for approval of the Planning
a a a
3.
-3- April 24, 1990
u t.eheents :
1. Findings
2. conditions commission minutes
3. Previous Planning
4, Reduced Site Plans
g Previous Staff comment Sheet
Submitted
by:
planner
_
Approved
by:
�tsy-ve
Planning
C
Director
ATTACHMENT 5
Ado�_� CPC o`4124/90
RESOLUTION NO. 2671
PLANNING COMMISSION
BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF CAMPF-L APPROVING A SITE AND
ARCHITECTURAL APPLI_.PION ALLOWING THE
SHOPPING
REMODEL AND EXPANSION OF AN
CENTER ON PROPERTY KNOWN AS 56650 IN OA SOUTH BASCOP!
AVENUE (APN DISTRICT.
APPLICATION CF MR. DEKE HUNTER.
ZONING DIST90 1
FILE NO•
public hearing a3 specified by law on the
royal of plans and elevations to
After notification and p shopping center on
application of Mr. and
a pansHuntionfof anpexisting
APN
allow the remodel and expansion District; and, after presentation
property known as 1650-1800 South Bascom Avenue (an
prop11-1,2,3,4,5,56) in a C-2-S Zoning opponents,
the hearing was
288- by the Planning Director, proponents and opP
closed.
After due consideration of all evidence presented, the Planning
Commission did find as follows: scale in relationship
The proposed project is an appropriate
1. �° ed uses•
l designed and architecturallyblends
to the adjacent develop ends
The project ect is we
improvement.
2 RQ§-ian: j
into the neighborhood The remodeled buildings are an imp
Provided parking ratio of 1:210 for retail
center, is
3• P�I��' table due to the size of shoe g pedestrian
considered ty to rovision of
accessibility to public transit and p
walkways.
4 ;bylyty: The project is designed to minimize infringement on
�Mighboring properties with the addition of screen walls.
and�raD;nq: Substantial landscaping has been provided which adds
5. * ro ect with the introduction of tree wells
to the aesthetics Of the p j
and street frontage landscaping• imposed, will 12
c�ndi ions: The project, subject to the conditions
6• and,
consistent with the General Plan; required conditions,
ro ect, subject to the mme
7 Ham; The proposed P 7 ment of the immediate area.
will aid in the harmonious develop act the
generates noise levels which impact
will
g, Noise: The site currently 9 Theas-ro osed develop
quiet of adjo
ining residentialeareated fromthedelivery area along
potentially add to the noisergo property lines.
the easterly and northerly p P
Resolution No.2671 (Con't.)
page 2
Based on the above findings, the Planning Commission does hereby grant
the requested development, subject to the attached conditions:
ed Site Plan: Revised site plan indicating items per staff
1. Revist
comment sheet to be submitted o the Planning Department and
ommis
approved by the Planning csion prior to application for a
Building Permit.
land
caped
2.
/randscaain4: Property to be fenced and dscaping-,ndsfencing
indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping
shall be maintained in accordance with the -approved t and
s aae Plan and Liahtin Landscaping plan indicating YP'
3• hased removal of existiny trees, details of
size of plant material, P
pedestrian walkways, and location of irrigatiovedybyetheoPlanning
be
submitted to the Planning Department and app lag to
of a
. Lighting
by
Commission prior theositeuandeArchitecturalgReviewtCommittee. P
be approved by
__,a wall Plan: Fencing plan indicating location and design
4 _e n Department and
detail of sound wall Site to be su mecturaloReviewlCommittt.ee. Sound wall
approved by all residential property
to be a minimum of 8 feet isuhe rtinglaglesser wall is presented and
lines unless a sound study pP
acceptable to the Planning Commission.
5.
ul Pe ormanc Bond or Agreement- Applicant to either (1)
post a faithful performance bond inothpark*ngtof areas40,000 withinto ensure
3 months
landscaping, fencing, and striping
of completion of construction; or (2) file a written agreement to
complete landscapingfencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond
or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to
application for a Building Permit.
a Screenins: Applicant to submit a letter to the Planning
tpellocationlof thepboxestandtscreening (transformer)
6. •of boxes
Department, prior
boxes, indicating for approval of the Planning Director.
are above ground)
All mechanical equipment on roofs and all
7. R f �uiom nt Screenscreened as approved by the Planning Director.
utility meters to be scrof the
i• Tmnrovetoer": Building occupancy
8. B.'ldino Occu°ancv/Pub 1c
new buildings will not be allowed until public improvements are
installed in accordance to phasing of public improvements.
Resolution No. 2671 (Con't.)
page 3
411 parking and driveway areas to be developed
Chapter 21.50 of the Capbc ll Municincrete curbs or
to be provided with appropriate
9, Parking/Driveways:
in compliance with
All parking spaces
bumper guards.
d U 17ities: Underground utilities to be provided as
10. Underrequired by Section 20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Co e.
11. J around Utilities Conrec iqM: Plans submitted to the Building
Division for a plan check shall indicate clearly
waterlOsewerT, of all
connections for underground utilities including
electric, telephone and television cables, etc.
Application: Sign application to be submitted in accordance
12. lign-�-nce for —
with provisionign to be
s of licaticn isthe sign daoproved andlpermitsissNedsbythe
bell
installed until app
Planning and Building Departments (Section21.53g� 4 be s�pmltted
Municipal Code). A comprehensive sign program
and approved by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of
building permits.
No.13. ba� ae;C°llection: ordinance
2the collectionof the CamlMunicipal and
cardisposal of
Code stipulates contract for
that any duced ithin tbeosalits
refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish pr
o
of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Dis
dwellings,
Company. This requirement applies to all single-family
multiple apartment units; to all commercial, business; industrial,
manufacturing, and construction establishments.
lq h on ain and Recycle Area: Trash container(s) of a size and
quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in
area(s) approved by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be
constructed at grade ,vel and have a level area ainers .adjacent to the
trash enclosure
tarea
he aite seryArchitectural ice these tReview CmmitteeAll eening to
be approved
and
+ ad Pe°u. ements: Applicant sY-131 comply with all
15 Hand-y handicapped.
Three
appropriate Stte and Cityl be requiremeadded ngstherretailabuilding frontage
additional spaces
as indicated on the redlined Exhibit phase I - Site Plan.
pub c works Department
16. kouts with concrete pads as
aMs DUCR°uts: Provide two bus duc
approved by City's Engineer in Phase I.
ient perm Ubtain an encroachment permit, pay fees, and
17. post avh
for relocating 4riveways, constructing curb gutter and
sidewalks post lks y and for any othe work required in the public
right -of -'.ay.
Resolution No. 2671 (Con't.)
page 4 ts of gradirg and drainage
Pro
18. G adina/Drainaae Plans itesvidShow vhow eoveral! drainage of site
plans for new building s
works, including alleyway*
19. Pa king adjustment: Adjust parking adjacent to bus duckout on
Bascom Avenue. ratio
-w;ram ctudv: Provide support to show that reduced parking
20 will be q ate to support proposed use.
DR ildina Division
*Tian Walxwav: A sidewalk should be added at the south entry
21. the handicapped and pedestrians out of the drive
approach to keep
path of automobiles. It is also required in current handicapped
regulations.
P a Denartment:
aP I and II:
22 a to al Aop oval - Fh February 1, 1991. Phase I
a) Phase I construction to commencting shoy in center and the
allows the remodel of thquare eyesfeet of additional retail space.
construction of 28, 1, 7.998. Phase II
b) Phase II construction to commence by February inder of the sthe
hopping center and
allows the remodel of the rewa
construction of 71600 square feet of additional retail urate
ion of
completion of the landscaping improvements and reconfiguration
the parking area.
23 AoorovP� FxhiblCS: site and Architectur4onAplazaaShoppingl is nCed to
Shopping Center,
remodel and add -on to the existing
by the Planning Commission on
as indicated on the exhibits app roved changes. Said
April 24, 1990, as "redli.ned" to reflect approved
approved exhibits are as follows:
- site Plan - Phase 1, adatedl4/10/90ated 4/18/90
- Site Plan - Phase II,
- Architectural Perspective dated 4/18/90
- Preliminary Landscape Plan - Phase I,
Architectural Rendering, dated 1/4/90
Corner Retail Pad Floor Plan
_ Elevations
- Corner•Retail Pad dated 3/16/90, Exhibit No. 5
- Floor Plan - Retail Building,
- Re- Rear
Elevationlldated 1/4/90,iExhibittNo,3�16/90, Exhibit No. 6
Resolution No. 2671 (Con't.)
page 5
24. N2is_1 Attenuation - Phase:
The applicant shall install an 8 foot high masonry acoustical
barrier along the easterly, and northerly property lines which
adjoin residential zoned parcels. Alternatively, the applicant may
use the existing carport/garage structures to provide an equivalent
sound attenuation provided he/she demonstrates the following:
1. Written agreement with all affected residential property owners
to allow the necessary upgrades and structural connections to
ensure an air tight wall of sufficient density to achieve a
noise reduction equivalent to an 8 foot high acoustical
barrier.
2. Installlandscaping and irrigation in the areas between the
service drive and acoustical wall and carports.
3. Demonstrate ability to ensure long term maintenance of the
carport walls and acoustical barriers to ensure the
effectiveness of the barrier.
4. The masonry wall and upgrades of the carport structures shall
be completed under the supervision of an acoustical engineer to
ensure an air tight construction for maximum sound attenuation.
The final wall plan shall be approved by the Site and Architectural
committee prior to release of building permits.
25. Noise Attenuation Phase II:
The applicant shall submit a separate acoustical analysis and
mitigation plan for approval by the Site and Architectural committee
prior to commencement of construction of Phase II improvements. The
plan shall evaluate noise levels associated with the anticipate-'
user of the Phase II area and recommend appropriate mitigation
measures, which may include but are not limited to the following:
1. Construction of an 8 foot high acoustical barrier along the
area adjacent to Phase II improvements.
2. Construction of a secondary acoustical barrier at the loading
dock to screen noise from loading and unloading activities.
26. Delivery Hours:
Deliveries to the service area shall be restricted between the hours
of 7 a.m., and 7 p.m. daily. The loading dock area shall be posted
to inform drivers of the restriction. The applicant/r.roperty owner
shall assume full responsibility for enforcement of this condition.
44 44
RESOLUTION NO. Z671
PLANNING COMMISSION
BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL APPROVING A SITE AND
ARCHITECTURAL APPLICATION ALLOWING THE
REMODEL AND EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING SHOPPING
CENTER ON PROPERTY KNOWN AS 1650-1800 SOUTH BASCOM
AVENUE (APN 288-11-1,2,3,4,5,56) IN A C-2-S
ZONING DISTRICT. APPLICATION OF MR. DEKE HUNTER.
FILE NO. S 90-01.
After notification and public hearing as specified by law on the
application of Mr. Deke Hunter for approval of plans and elevations to
allow the remodel and expansion of an existing shopping center on
property known as 1650-1800 South Bascom Avenue (APN
288-11-1,2,3,4,5,56) in a C-2-S Zoning District; and, after presentation
by the Planning Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was
closed.
After due consideration of all evidence presented, the Planning
Commission did find as follows:
1. Scale: The proposed project is an appropriate scale in relationship
to the adjacent developed uses.
2. Design: The project is well designed and architecturally blends
into the neighborhood The remodeled buildings are an improvement.
3. Parking: Provided parking ratio of 1:210 for retail uses is
considered acceptable due to the size of Ghopping center,
accessibility to public transit and provision of pedestrian
walkways.
4. Compatibility: The project is designed to minimize infringement on
neighboring properties with the addition of screen walls.
5. LAndscaping: Substantial landscaping has been provided which adds
to the aesthetics of the project with the introduction of tree wells
and street frontage landscaping.
S. QQnditions: The project, subject to the conditions imposed, will be
consistent with the General Plan; and,
7. Harmony: The proposed project, subject to the required conditions,
will aid in the harmonious development of the immediate area.
8. Noise: The site currently generates noise levels which impact the
quiet of adjoining residential areas. The proposed development will
potentially add to the noise generated from the delivery area along
the easterly and northerly property lines.
als
Resolution No.2671
PC NTG: April 24, 1990
File No. S 90-01 - 1650 - 1880 S. Bascom
page 2
Based on the above findings, the Planning Commission does hereby grant
the requested development, subject to the attacned conditions:
1. Revised Site Plan: Revised site plan indicating items per staff
comment sheet to be submitted to the Planning Department and
approved by the Planning Commission prior to application for a
Building Permit.
2. Fencing/Landscaping: Property to be fenced and landscaped as
indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing
shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans.
3. Landscape Plan and Lighting: Landscaping plan indicating type and
size of plant material, phased removal of existing trees, details of
pedestrian walkways, and location of irrigation system to be
submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning
Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. Lighting plan to
be approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee.
4. Fencing and Wall Plan: Fencing plan indicating location and design
detail of sound wall to be submitted to the Planning Department and
approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. Sound wall
to be a minimum of 8 feet in height along all residential property
lines unless a sound study supporting a lesser wall is presented and
acceptable to the Planning Commission.
5. Faithful Performance Bond or Agreement: Applicant to either (1)
post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $41.000 to ensure
landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas w_chin 3 months
of completion of construction; or (2) file a written agreement to
complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond
or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to
application for a Building Permit.
6. Utility Box Screening: Applicant to submit a letter to the Planning
Department, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer)
boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if boxes
are above ground) for approval o the Planning Director.
7• Roof Equipment rling: All mechanical equipment on roofs and all
utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director.
8. Building Occupancy/Public Improvements: Building occupancy of the
new buildings will not be allowed until public improvements are
installed in accordance to phasing of public improvements.
ft
Resolution No. 2-71
PC MTG: April 1990
File NO. S 90-01 - 1650 - 1880 S. Bascom
page 3
9. Parklna/DrIytwaVB: _All parking and driveway areas to be developed
in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code.
All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or
bumper guards.
10. UnderaroundUtilities: Underground utilities to be provided as
requirad by Section 23.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code.
il. Underaround Utilities onn t
Divlslon for a plan check shall indicate clearly ethe olocatIon lofnall
connections for 'inderground utilities including water, sewer,
electric, telephone and television cables, etc.
12. ion: Sign application to be submitted in accordance
with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be
installed until application is approved and permit issued by the
Planning and Building Departments (Section 21.53 of the Campbell
Municipal Code). A comprehensive sign program should be submitted
and approved by the Planning
building permits. Commission prior to issuance of
13. gdrbaae Colle ion: Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal
Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of
refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits
of the City of Campbell shall he made with Green Valley Disposal
Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings,
multiple apartment units; to all commercial, business, industrial,
manufacturing, and construction establishments.
14. Trash Container and RggyCle Area: Trash container(s) of a size and
quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in
area(s) approved by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be
constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the
trash enclosure area to service these containers. All screening to
be approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee.
15. Pandica0ped R a irements: Applicant shall comply with all
appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. Three
additional spaces shall be added along the retail building frontage
as indicated on the redlined Exhibit phase I - Site Plan.
Public Works Department
16. Bua Duckouts: Provide two bus duckouts with concrete pads as
approved by City's Engineer in Phase I.
ak dk^
Resolution No. 2671
PC MTG: April 24, 1990
File No. S 90-01 - 1650 - 1880 S. Bascom
page 4
17. Encroachment Permit: Obtain an encroachment permit, pay fees, and
post surety for relocating driveways, constructing curb gutter and
sidewalks and for any other work required in the public
right-of-way.
18. gXading/Drainaoe Plans: Provide five sets of grading and drainage
plans for new building sites. Show how overall drainage of site
works, including alleyway.
19. Parking Adjustment: Adjust parking adjacent to bus duckout on
Bascom Avenue.
20. Parking Study: Provide support to show that reduced parking ratio
will be adequate to support proposed use.
Building Division
21. Pedestrian Walkway: A sidewalk should be added at the south entry
approach to keep the handicapped and pedestrians out of the drive
path of automobiles. It is also required in current handicapped
regulations.
22. Site and Architectural Approval - Phase I and II:
a) Phase I construction to commence by February 1, 1991. Phase I
allows the remodel of the existing shopping center and the
construction of 28,500 square feet of additional retail space.
b) Phase II construction to commence by February 1, 1998. Phase II
allows the remodel of the remainder of the chopping center and the
construction of 7,600 square feet of additional retail space. The
completion of the landscaping improvements and reconfiguration of
the parking area.
21. Approved Exhibits: Site and Architectural Approval is granted to
remodel and add -on to the existing Hamilton Plaza Shopping Center,
as indicated on the exhibits approved by the Planning Commission on
April 24, 1990, as "redlined" to reflect approved changes. Said
approved exhibits are as follows:
- Site Plan - Phase I, as redlined, dated 4/24/90
- Site Plan - Phase II, dated 4/24/90
- Architectural Perspective
- Preliminary Landscape Plan - Phase I, dated 4/18/90
- Architectural Rendering, dated 1/4/90
- Corner Retail Pad - Floor Plan
- Corner Retail Pad - Elevations
dft
Resolution No. 2671
PC KTG: April 24, 1990
File No. S 90-01 - 1650 - 1880 S. Bascom
page 5
Floor Plan - Retail Building, dated 3/16/90, Exhibit No. 5
Rear Elavaiionildated 1/4/90CiExhibitLNo.ed 3716J90, Exhibit No. 6
24. hea Attenuation - Phase:
The applicant shall install an 8 foot high aaY lineswhich
barrier along the easterly,and northerly property licant may
adjoin residential zoned araesttosprovide anly, the pequivalent
use the existing carport/g9estructures
sound attenuation provided he/she demonstrates the following:
1 Written agreement with all affected residential property owners
to allow the necessary upgrades and structural connections to
all
reduction walentftouansff181footdhightacousticaly to ve a
ensure
noise
barrier.
2. Install landscaping and irrigation in the areas between the
service drive and acoustical wall and carports.
3. Demonstrateability to ensure long term maintenance of the
carport walls and acoustical barriers to ensure tha
effectiveness of the barrier.
4. The masonry wall and upgrades of the carport structures shall
be complean acoustical engineer to
ted under the supervision of
ensure an air tight construction for maximum sound attenuation.
The final wall plan shall be approved by the Site and Architectural
Committee prior to release of building F^snits.
"oise At*�^'__tom Phase II:
25.
The applicant shall submit a sepihatSitand
improvements. The
oand1Architecturalnalysis aCommittee
mitigation plan for approval by
prior to commencement of construction of Phase II
plan shall evaluate noise levels associated with the anticipated
e II area and recommend appropriate mitigation
user of the Phas
are not limited to the following:
measures, which may include but
1, Construction of an a foot high acoustical barrier along the
area adjacent to Phase II improvements.
loading
barrir
2 dockttocscreenfncisecfrom rloading tand lunloadia ngacti"ities.
26. DeliV@rY Hour@:
Deliveries to the s rvdailareaThgaloadingedorkcareabshall11bahpoateds
of 7 a.m., and 7 p.m. Y• applicant/property owner
to inform drivers of the restriction. Tile
shall assume full responsibility for enforcement of this condition.
ft Oft
Resolution No. 2671 (COn't.)
page 6 code provides that any
bell Municipalire one year attar the data
Section 21•�2.100 of the issP unless an extension or
approval granted uniavalthis
wassgranted,unl expire
upon which such approval
pp roved.
reinstatement is app approval of the
tan days after decision o
Approval 1s effectiveunless f
an appeal is filed.
planning Commission,
Y of April, 1990 by the following roll
PASSED AND ApppTED this 24th da
call vote: ission
Commers: Christ, Fox, Alne, NeYer' Wilkinson
AYES: Olszewski
NOES:
Commissioners! None
ABSENT: Commissioners: Perr na
A. E
APPROVED: 7.. a rson
Vice Chairpe
ATTEST: secretary
wa p' rri
Secretary
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting of April 10, 1990
Page 2
--------------------------------------------------------
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
1. UP 90-03/ Continued Public Hearing to consider the
S 90-01 application of Mr. Deke Hunter, on behalf of Hunter
Hunter Prop. Properties, for approval of a Site and Architectural
Application to allow the remodel and expansion of an
existing shopping center, on properties known as
1650 - 1800 South Bascom Avenue, in a C-2-S (General
commercial Zoning District. (Planning Commission
action final, unless appealed.)
Staff Presentation:
Director Piasecki reviewed the application and presented Staff Report,
calling attention to the fact that applicant is withdrawing the Use
Permit portion of this application. This hearing addresses only the
Site request.
MOTION: Cos. Olszewski moved to withdraw the Use Permit portion from
this application.
SECOND: Comm. Fox
VOTE: Passed 6-0-1-0.
Director Piasecki reviewed the pedestrian approach questioned by Comm.
Alne and the parking of compact car ratio addressed by Comm. Wilkinson.
Situ and Architectural Review Committee Report - 4/3i90.
Comm. Fox reported Committee support of this application as redlined by
Director Piasecki. In addition, the Committee had the following
suggestions:
Provisions of trash enclosures throughout the project.
The last 4 bays of the main parking (southern most bays) would be
converted to 75 degree parking.
Tower element to be added to the southern most portion of the
building.
Aoolicant's Presentation: Mr. Hunter made himself available to answer
questions both from the Commission and the public.
Public Hearing was opened.
Comm. Olszewski stated he was concerned about the remc,-.,al/replacement
of the existing eucalyptus trees, landscaping, signage, lighting
elements, enough room at Bascom Avenue entrance to make left hand turn
onto Hamilton, areas designated for shopping carts, landscaping in
Phase II, trash enclosure identification areas.
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting of April 20, 1990-
Page 3
------------------------------------------•-------- -------------------
Staff and applicant replied landscaping would take place during Phase
I, details of signage program was not addressed. The lights within the
parking lot would probably be changed, but not along the sidewalks.
Mr. Helms of the Public Works Department, said they would look into the
width of entrances and work with the applicant. Director Piasecki will
work with applicant to see if sidewalk relocation, bus duckouts and
parkway landscaping which is now set for Phase II, can be done during
Phase I. As to the trash enclosures, this is a part of Condition 014
which can also be made a part of Condition 11.
When asked about future restaurant at corner of Bascom and Hamilton,
applicant replied this would be applied for at a later date. Applicant
stated primary entrances into shopping center will be from Campisi and
Hamilton Avenues.
Comm. Wilkinson addressed the issue of height and location of berming -
to which Staff indicated this was only a concept, is not encouraged at
this point and will be addressed in future site plans.
Comm. Alne wanted clarification of more details during Phase I
regarding landscaping and traffic hazards along Bascom and Hamilton
Avenues and asked regarding economic limitation and would make it
difficult for applicant to comply with the recommendations of the
Commission given current tenant -mix, terms of leases, etc., was this
project premature? The applicant satisfactorily answered this
question.
Director Piasecki pointed out to Commission that Condition /1 required
the applicant to return with a revised site plan. He also noted that
applicant had options of eliminating one parking space on one side,
both sides or eliminate some of the spaces right at the throat hoping
to give tt,e driver coming into this driveway an option of turning right
or left.
Mr. Hunter stated that during Phase I they would demolish existing
monolithic sidewalks along Hamilton Avenue and come in with 10' of
landscaping and a 7' sidewalk, provide bus duckouts both along Bascom
and Hamilton Avenues as required by Public Works.
The following people spoke:
Mr. Ray Clark, 325 April Way, Campbell. His concerns were length of
time improvements would be made, traffic impacts along both Hamilton
and Bascom Avenues, and 6' wall.
Mrs. Helen Davis, 448 April Way. Her main concerns: traffic, entrances
to shopping area, distance of duckout from corner of Hamilton to
entrance, height of 6' wall not enough buffer, environmental impact to
take place over the next 10 years of possible construction.
Ai -
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
Regular Meeting of April 10, 1990
Page 4 _ -----------------
Mr. Hunter clarified that 10 years meant only that they had the option
to complete Phase II of the project and the height of the wall was a
City Code requirement. Mr. Hunter then addressed the Conditions:
f2 P,rtaining to sound wall - majority of property abuts
basically stucco garages - repeating situation by adding more
sound wall, except for Robway where there is no existing wall.
Is Public improvements - needs more specific details/requirements
from Public works.
110 Underground improvements - not in their plans to modify how
these come into the existing shopping center. Any would be to
new improvements and no: to existing conditions.
/16 Would like to do bus duckout on Bascom Ave. in Phase II, if at
all possible.
Comm. Alne questioned the wording of Condition /8. Mr. Helms noted
regular procedure prior to releasing a building permit for any
additional construction on site required tie developer to enter into
agreement with the Public Works to provide for construction of all
off -site improvements and in answer to his inquiry as to where the bus
duckouts would be located, it was reaffirmed they would be on Hamilton
(alongside where the Liquor darn is now) and at the intersection of
Bascom and Campisi.
Comm. Wilkinson asked applicant if they could shorten their option time
to 8 or even 5 years to which he was informed the Pay and Pak lease
would not expire until 1999. Director Piasecki suggested that the bus
duckouts and the landscaping be addressed again at the SARC when they
review Condition 01 again.
Comm. Chistowing
had beenrlefteout eofethe odrawings so hencern as to fewanted toeknow lanswers edetails
in
regard to:
what kinds of lighting would be installed throughout the
project;
bus duckouts on Hamilton - can a quzue lane he established?
move sidewalk back from street?
signage program;
parking requirements for handicap;
the center entrance from Bascom would make people backing out
onto this througtway unsafe.
Mr. Hunter commented that if overhead lines had to be moved, it would
on
the City
pays
afor this, tonwhich lMr. Holm assured them.
assuredhimwthedCity would bnot willing to
bear
that expense.
Director Piasecki noted that although garages/car ports abut the
property now; there is likely no sound attenuation and Staff feels the
intent of that condition should be carried chrough.
Comm. Alne commence% on:
Drivers coming East off Bascom into shopping center and
wishing to immediately return to Bascom, were creating an
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES FOR IN . V
Regular Meeting of April 10, 1990
Page 5 ----------------
unsafe situation as there is not enough space to make a safe
u-turn without possibly running into oncoming traffic headed
out to Bascom;
Wanted clarification as to why the Commission was being asked
to approve Phase II which was not going to take place
immediately.
Director Piasecki stated that Staff is supportive of Phase II now, as
it is a 6-ill part of the entire project - largely architectural.
Comm. Christ commented that if Commission approved this now the balance
would be guaranteed to be finished withinthe specified period of tins
and Condition /5 satisfies this guarantee.
Comm. Olszewski said that although the applicant had made a good start
in presenting this project, there were still too many details left
unanswered and would be prudent to continuethis arinq. As it stood
now, he would be unable to support this application.
d
comm.Christdenial. agrHe eed thatssed if hcurbcutsvontKamiltongnbus duckoutsltake
place in Phase I and center entrance problems be addressed.
lack oflinformation. would halsomlikeltoeseelCondition s15aaddressedcontinue
for
again - landscaping in Phase II to be tied into the Building Permit.
Comm• Fox - noted it would be to applicant's best interest to review
these items. Requested of Staff that there be enough time at the SARC
meeting to review it at length.
The Public Hearing remained open.
MOTION: Comm. Olszevski moved to Continue S90-01 (Hunter Properties)
to April 24, 1990.
SECOND: Comm. Christ
VOTE: Passed 6-0-1-0.
items Comm. Olszewski would like addressed at the next Planning
Commission meeting would be following, but necessarily limited to:
!. Widening of center Bascom Avenue entrance and the Hamilton Avenue
entrance.
2. Consider a turn lane, or a deceleration lane at both the center
Bascom Avenue and :iamilton entrances.
3. Signage Program for shopping ntranc
4. All landscaping and parking improvements in Phase I.
5Handicap spaces be clearly marked.
6.. Stop signs within the parking lot at the center Bascom Avenue
entrance.
rcupJ
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Y
Regular Meeting of April 0, 1990
Page6 --------------------------------------------------
----- --------------
7. Stop signs in the parking lot at the Bascom entrance.
S. No removal of trees until the site plans indicate the !.ocation of
signs on the buildings. outs _
9. specifications what are we going stouloseigaineascwheretly g
far as landscaping,
to go,
parking, etc.
10. How to slow traffic down in front of buildings and parking lot.
11. Indicate shopping cart areas.
12. Landscaping directly in front of buildings
13. Location of public telephones in shopping center.
d
14. Provision of peestrian access at Robway Avenue.
15. Landscape plan at Robway Avenue against the sound wall.
16. Tower element at end - Phase 1I - more detail.
17. Shortening time frame between both Phases.
is. Clear definition of what is contained in both Phases.
19. Clear definition of location of trash enclosures both ;or Phase
and Phase II, as well as recyclable areas.
20. Condition 14 should read that it should come back to the Planning
Commission.
21. Would want to hear from neighborhood regarding height of wall
higher/lower?
22. Location of compact cars identified - exact location.
23. Clarification/Deletion of Condition IS.
24. Interface/compatibility of new facade with old facade that will be
remaining.
m
0
RIFOAWX AtF
April 18, 1990 R
D APR ?4 Ec9.3
CITY OF CAMPB[LL
Mr. Bill Hagman PLANNING O[1ARTMLN7
The Hagman Group
1990 The Alameda
San Jose CA 95126
Dear Bill,
We have completed the tree survey for the property on the Southe6st corner of
Basoom Avenue and Hamilton Avenue. We found that the existing trees should be
replaced
with new
trees on specific in order to p
exegood
short-
and long-range landscaping.
Follow
are
that
The Olives (Otea europeona) have been so severely pruned
neededover
ehade y See s ph t they
are not aesthetically attractive, nor do they provide
Thirty-one olives exist on the site.
The Elms (Ulmus parvifolia) appear healthy, but are presently quarantined in Santa
Clara County. See photo 82. Twenty elms exist on the site.
The Eucalyptus trees should be removed for aesthetic and maintenance reasons. See
pboto M3. Fourteen Eucalyptus exist on the site.
We are recommending that the 31 Olives and the 14 Eucalyptus be removed from the
site. The new parking and retail building will require the removal of 14 Chinese
Elms. Six Chinese Elms are in planting areaan s
y suggest the remain and would removal require
removal, although a new unified planting p
six
remaining Elma.
Sincerely.
REED ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE CCRPORATION
(3t
Paul Ja eed
cc: Deke Hunter. Hunter Properties
Reed
Unduape Arch-
10055 Milk, Avenue. Surte 101 n - n l
Cuperrinn. Calif. 95014 $
408-446-Sei9 Hunter Prop.
" EDWARD L. PACK ASSOCIATES, INC.
TEL1010E CWNE AVENUE, WITE F Aroustwal COftudla,III FAX 4O0-MOO
SUNNYVALE CA Was FAX AOFUOOfi!
April 27, 1990
Proisct Ho. 22-05e
Mr. Bill Hagman, Jr.
The Hagman Group
1990 The Alameda
San Jogs, California 95726
subject: Noise Assessment Study For the Planned ^Bascom and
Hamilton Center" Retail Development, Bascom and
Hamilton Avenue, Campbell
Dear Mr. Hagman:
This report presents the results of a noise assessment study for
the planned retail development at Bascom and Hamilton Avenues in
Campbell, as shown on the Site Plan, Ref.(a). The noise levels
presented herein were determined from on -site noise measurements
and sound data acquired from previous studies performed for
similar projects. The levels were evaluated against the
standards of the City of Campbell noise Element, Ref.(b).
Sections i and II of this report contain a summary of our
findings and recommendations, respectively. Subsequent sectionr
include the measurement data, site ant project descriptions,
evaluations, analyses, and conclusions. Appendices A and B,
attached, contain the list of references, terminology, a
description of the instrumentation used for the field survey,
and noise standards applicable to this study.
MOVE
APR 24 1993
s 90-01
CITY OF CAMPOELL Hunter Properties
CITY OF CAMPBELL
PLANNINQ DEPAIETM9W
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
,.1 ~ ACM0TCA,2001ITVOAAA*.
AwahlOMUN-0900e
-2-
1. rindinas
The findings below include the results of the field
measurements and predictions of future traffic volumes. The
noise exposure levels were evaluated against the standards of the
City of Campbell, which employ the L10, L50, 1/24, 8/24, and
.5/24 statistical noise descriptors. The L10 is that sound level
exceeded 10% of the time over a given time period. Similarly,
the L50 is that sound level exceeded 50% of the time over a given
time period. The Campbell standards specify daytime (7:00 a.m.
to 9:00 p.m.) and nighttime (9:00 P.A. to 7:00a.m.) standards for
residential land uses. The standards specify that exterior noise
levels must not exceed 55 dBA L10 and 50 dB L50 during the
daytime or 45 dBA L10 and 40 dBA LS0 during the nighttime to be
considered "clearly acceptable" for residential land use. For
interior spaces, noise levels must not exceed 55 dBA for more
than 1 hour in every 24 hours (1/24), or 45 dBA for more than 8
hours in every 24 hours (8/24), or 45 dBA for more than 30
minutes (.5/24) during the hours of 11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. when
these levels are exceeded, mitigation measure will be required.
Noise levels reported in this section are from on -site noise
measurements and calculations and are without the application of
mitigation measures.
A. Exte for Noise Levels
- The exterior noise levels at residential units closest
to the existing loading docks are a maximum of 58 dBA
L10 and 52 dBA L50. These levels are occurring during
Ab Adik
- 3 -
hours of peak loading dock activity, and are 2 to 3 dB
in excess of the city of Campbell daytime exterior
standard.
The majority of the noise impacts are generated by the
larger retail stores in the complex, i.e., Liquor Barn,
Bread of Life, Long'a, and Pay'N Pak. Smaller retail
outlets, such as the McDuff Super Store, the Dress
Barn, and the Eing's Table restaurant make essentially
no contribution to the existing loading dock noise
levels, as deliveries are on the order of 1 to 2 per
week.
As the majority of loading dock activity takes place
during the hours of 8:00 to 5:00 p.m., most noise
:mpacts from loading dock activity will be restricted
to the daytime hours. However, one store (Broad of
Life) starts loading deck operations at 6100 a.m.
Early morning operations usually include unloading 1 to
2 somi trailer trucks, which are significant loading
dock noise sources. Thus, exterior noise of levels of
58 dBA Lio and 52 dBA L50 may also be occurring at the
residences closest to the Broad of Life loading dock
during the nighttime hours of 6:00-7:00 a.m. These
levels are 12 to 13 dB in excess of the City of
Campbell nighttime exterior standard.
After completion of Phase I of the project, new noise
impacts will be relatively minor. The additional
AML Ah
ft
�s
retail space created by the project will be used by
relatively small retail tenants which do not generate
large amounts of loading dock traffic. The planned B
ft. high sound will provide 8 to 10 dB of noise
reduction at adjacent ground floor residential areas.
Thus, noise levels generated by these stores will be
lover than thosw reported for the major sources of
loading dock noise, and will be within the limits of
the City of Campbell standards provided that no
nighttime loading dock activity occurs. However, as
new retail space will be created, residences directly
adjacent to the new retail space will be impacted by
slightly higher noise levels and new noise sources.
After completion of Phase II of the project, a large
supermarket is likely to bft introduced to the center at
the present Pay'N Pak location. The impacts from the
supermarket cannot be exactly determined, as the
delivery ecnedule and other factors are not known at
this ties. However, previous stud!.es made oy us
indicate that large supermarkets are often the major
noise sources of large retail centers, due to the high
number of delivery trucks and high mechnnical equipment
noise levels usually generated by these stores.
At present, rooftop HVAC and refrigeration equipment do
not create significant noise impacts due to the
relatively low HVAC and refrigeration demand for the
center. However, with the implementation of Phase II,
- 5 -
a• discussed above, mechanical equipment noise may
create tutu.• noise impacts at nearby residences.
e. interior Bolas Lvel■
The interior noise levels at residential units closest
to the existing loading docks are 51 dBA 1/24 and 44
dbA 8/24 with windows open, with windows closed, these
levels are 41 dBA 1/24 and 14 dBA 8/24. These levels
aru within the limits of the city of Campbell daytime
interior noise standards.
he discussed above, residences closest to the Bread of
Life store are experiencing nighttime noise impacts
from the hours of 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. The existing
interior noise levels from this source are 55 dDA .5/24
with the windows op3n and 45 dBA .5/24 with the windows
closed. Thus, impacted residences are experiencing
interior noise levels 10 dB in excess of the Campbell
nighttime interior standard with the windows open and
are in compliance with the standards with the windows
closed.
As shown by the above evaluation, existing noise levels generated
ty the r4tail center are exceeding the exterior and interior
noise level standards at some locations and/or under certain
conditions. whether these excesses require mitigation is a
matter for the City of Campbell to decide, and may depend on
whether complaints have been registered in refs*sncs to the
6 -
existing noise levels. Mitigation measures designed to reduce
existing noise impacts to acceptable levels are described in
Section I1, below.
Under Phase I of the project, new noise impacts will bw
generated. These impacts will not be significant for typical
small retail store operating conditions. The addition of a
supermarket under Phase II of the project has the potential for
creating additional significant noise impacts to nearby
residents. Mitigation measures that can be adopted to prevent
supermarket generated noise levels from exceeding the standards
are addressed in Section I1, below.
II. RaDVAMAndRURM
To achieve compliance with the City of Campbell standards,
the following mitigation measures will be required. Both the
mitigation of existing noise impacts and the mitigation of Phase
11 impacts are addressed.
A. Existing Noises imna=
As discussed in Section I above, the existing exterior noise
levels exceed the Campbell standards by 2-3 dB. However, the
nearest residential units to the existing loading docks are
apartments, with car -ports and a driveway in between the
apartments and the property line. Exterior areas which could be
used specifically for recreation or relaxation do exist, however,
these areas are relatively small and do not appear to be used
extensively. If it is desired to provide exterior noise control
... -_ _., ...x .• .�_����+ •_ r.w� n.»ati �C� U•••.l0-i.HU-V/�Jc "1J, rW
- 7 -
at adjacent residential areas, the following measures may be
implemented:
Construct a 7 ft. high acoustically -affective barrier
along the rear property line adjacent to residential
development.
The existing 7 to 8 ft. high carports provide adequate
noise shleldllg to areas directly behind them. However, gaps
between the carporte are closed off with typical 6 ft. high "good
neighbor" fencing, which is not acoustically -effective and allows
sound transmission between the ends of the carports. Thus, an
effective sound barrier can be created by replacing the existing
fencing between carports with acoustically -effective fencing as
described below. If this option in chosen, a fence along the
entire property line would not be required.
To achieve an acoustically -effective barrier or fence, it
must be made air -tight, i.e., without cracks, gapsor other
openings and provide for long-term durability. The property line
barrier can be constructed of wood or masonry, and must have a
minimum surface weight of 2.0 lbs. per sq.ft. The barrier can
also consist of an earth berm with a owr masonry at materials on
are
top. If a wood fence is used, homogeneous
preferable to conventional wood fencing because of the tendency
of the latter to warp and form openings with ago. bHowever, high
quality, airtight, tongus-and-groove, ehipldp
oard and
batten construction can be used, provided the minimum surface
weight requirements is met and the construction is air -tight.
The noise control barrier must be constructed so that all joints,
... _ � _ ., . • x ... , �..... u.. _ r.w.r. n�.xx i c� �.,,:..ua- �-u • u� F17 r 11T!
- 0 -
including connections with the sides of carports, posts, or
pilasters are sealed air -tight, and no openings are pk°rmitted
between the barrier and the ground.
As noted in section 1, above, interior noise levels will
exceed the standards during the nighttime hours of 6:00 to 7:00
a.m. at residences adjacent to the Bread of Life loading dock
when windows are open. Two alternatives can be used to address
this problem:
Restrict loading activity behind the retail center to
daytime hours after 7:00 a.m.
- Inform sptrtment residents with living spaces within
300 ft. of the Bread of Life loading dock area and
having a direct or side view of the loading dock area
that by maintaining windows closed during the early
morning hours, interior noise levels within the City
standards can he maintained.
Although the noise levels generated by supermarket cannot be
determined at this time, the following measures will allow noise
impacts from the planned supermarket to be kept to a minimum:
- Restrict loading dock activity at the planned
supermarket to the daytime hours (7:00 a.m. to 9:00
P.M.).
�� ITrt-�J- T'1 1f:7J IU: ILllll ll,�l l.YFll1. M551K. tL MJ: 4tkl-r'jy�J'.'� A15'i I�IU
- 9 -
Discourage idling of large trucks at the rear of the
cents- for long perioda of time. Occasional idling of
trucks is necessary to maintain refrigeration in some
loads. However, if trucks must idle, then an area at
the front of the center can be set aside for tompora�/
truck parking.
If loading dock hours cannot be restrict,cd, then an
enclosed loading dock area will need to be constructed.
The enclosure must consist of a minimum 14 ft. high
noise control barrier which enclosas the loadinq dock
area on all sides except as required for access. Lower
barrier heights may be used by depressing the loading
dock surface below ground level. The depressed area
and/or barrier must be long enough to completely
enclo" the entire length of a typical semi trailer
truck plus an additional 15 ft.
Install all rooftop mechanical equipment as far away
from r+sident).+'. areas as possible. Additional noise
redL=rior. is likely to be required, and can take the
:orm of noise screens or wnclosures which completely
surrounC the equipment.
It should be noted that these measures are preliminary in nature,
pending more detailed information about the proposed supermarket.
More specific mitigation measures can be developed once this
information becomes available.
- 10 -
III. Qit• and Protect ^==^rintian
The planned development site is an existing retail center
located at the northeast corner of Bascom and Uton Avenues in
campball. The site is generally flat and on -grade
surrounding roadways. Two-s'ory apartment complexes are locate]
approximately 15 to SS ft. to the east of the retail center
property line.
The planned protect consists of a small addition to the
existing center and two additional commercial buildings. one
building will be located at the southeast corner of the Otte,
which is presently vacant. The second building will be located
at the corner of Hamilton and Bascom Avenue', The project also
includes a renovation of the existing facade facing onto Bascom
Avenue. Ingress and egress to center is by way of Hamilton and
Bascom Avenues. The loading dock driveway will be maintained as
for existing conditions. A site plan for the project is shown on
Figure 1, herein.
IV - RZAIUSUM
A. ryiat ne No ae iAXala
To evaluate the existing noise environment at the site,
noise level measurements were made on April 17, 1990 using a Gen
Red 1945 community Noise Analyser. The analyzer records noise at
a rats of 16,292 samples per hour and performs statistical
analyses. Table I, below shows the 1,10, L50 L90
aen-'-1tl-0 rki2 a15'r Y12
i.e., those noise levels exceeded for 302, 502and 904 of the
time. Also shown are the .5/24, 1/24, and 8/4
deswhich represent ;he noise levels exceed for 1/2 hour (0.5 hour),
i hour, and 8 hours during a 24-hour period. The maximum,
minimum, and continuous equivalent (LeQ) noise levels are
included as general information.
T�BL�-a
exist na Noi "•�" xeasured
F From ' - ""^k I�ctivity
Time Per{od —
Nolan Iwval■ dBA �q
LmaX L10 L50 L90 1n
76
7:30-8:30 a.m. (daytime) 114 64 58 54 91
_R/24 uu UU
71 67 60
The noise level measurements in the table were made weekday,during
the peak period of loading dock activity for a typical
as determined by interviews with store maragers for the center,
Ref. (c). The noise sources encountered during the measurement
period included passbys from various vehicles, including delivery
i-trailer truck t1`distance, vans, trucks, and one son
andL levels shown in
which is responsible for the high LMaX eq
the Table. other noise sources including idlingactor, and vehicles,ther voice
refrigeration equipment, a trash comp
and mechanical sounds associated with
loading
erty line
The measurements were made along red ter property
at a distance of 50 ft, from the Bread of Life loading
nrr-cam �u 1.•t �u•ic..��u���., Ynt.v. n»tJ_ icL
- 12 -
which was determined to be the busiest area during the
moasurement period. The measured levels are fairly typical of
loading dock operations, as compared with loading dock noise
levels encountered at similar projects we have measured.
Noise diminishes at a rate of 6 dB for each doubling of the
distance from the source to the receiver. Residential areas at
greater distances from the retail center will receive lower
levels of noise. The existing noise levels at existing
residences nearest t3 the retail center will be 6 dB lower than
the measured levels, due to the additional 50 ft. average
distance from the measurement location to the nearest residences.
Thus, the residential units closest to loading dock ar,sas will
experience maximum noise levels of 58 dBA L10 and 52 dBA L50
after the reduction in noise levels over distance have been taken
into account. These levels occur only during the daytime hours
at most loading docks except for the Bread of Life store, which
starts receiving at 6:oo a.m. Thus, residents closest to the
Broad of Life loading dock area experience maximum nighttime
noise levels of similar magnitude from 6:00 to 7:00 a.m. During
the remaining nighttime hours, the exterior noise levels are much
lower, as no loading dock activity is taking place. The L10
dB in excess of the Campbell daytime exterior standard
level is 3
and 13 dB above the Campbell nighttime exterior standard. The
LSD level is 2 dB in excess of the Campbell daytime exterior
standard and 12 dB in excess of the Campbell nighttime exterior
standard.
To determine the interior noise impacts, reductions were
applied to th& exterior noise levels to account for the noise
- 13 -
reduction provided by a typical building shell under open and
closed window conditions. Under open window conditions, a
typical building shell provides 10 dB of noise reduction, as
exterior noise is easily transmitted through an open window. In
typical buildinq shells with single -strength window glass,,
approximately 20 dB of noise reduction is obtained with the
windows closed. The Campbell interior standards are expressed in
terms of the 1/24, 8/24, and 0.5/2♦ noise descriptors. A 6 dB
reduction was applied to the measured exterior levels to account
for the reduction in noise levels over distance, and the 10 and
20 dB reductions were than applied to these levels.
Thus, the interior noise levels at living spaces closest to
loading dock areas are 51 dBA 1/24 and 44 dBA 8/24 during the
daytime hours with windows open. With windows closed, the
interior noise levels are 41 dBA 1/24 and 34 dBA 8/24. These
levels are within the limits of the City of Campbell standards.
At living spaces closest to the Bread of Life loading dock,
the interior noise level is 55 dBA .5/24 with windows open and 45
dBA .5/24 with windows cloned. These levels apply during the
hours of G:00 to 7100 a.m. The interior noise level with windows
open is 10 dB in excess of the Campbell nighttime interior
standard. With windows closed, the interior noise level is in
compliance with the standards. Interior noise levels are within
the standards during the remaining nighttime hours, as no loading
dock activity is taking place.
- 14 -
B. a r �r�e YA"
To determine the additional noise impacts that would be
, referatica was made to several inu9 d
ies
created by the projectcenters
performed by us that analyzed noise impacts from ehopp
similar in size to the project. The noise level data and other ditions at the Project
conditions :are adjusted to represent con
site.
The project under Phase I consists of a 7,600 sq. ft.
existing building, a 15,000 Sq. ft. retail
addition to the
building at the southeast corner of the site, and a
10,0oo sq. ft. retail building at the northwest corner of the
ate
site. Discussions with the project architect, paf. , a largindier
several small retail stores will occupy these spaces, as larger
ch as supermarkets or large drug store chains would
tenants su
require more floor mpace. UnderC�acurrentlyse
occ up
is being contemplated for the spa
Pay,$ ^ak store.
A review of shopping center noise levsl data with respect to
Phase I indicates that the additional retail space Proposed would
not create any significant noise impacts to nearby residents.
of our previous noise studies for shopping centers
The results
acts from loading
indicate that the majority of noise impto stores that require
activities at shopping cantorsre du arly if semitrailer trucks
large numbers of deliveries, Pa large
are involved. Major noise generators include ssu es orkhome
orma
drugstore chains, and other large department
improvement stores. As determined by our noise measurements at
n i ui. � �• rrtir. r,SxR. 1 tL MJ:.INb- �NN-N
�� A17/ Ylb
- 15 -
the sits, the major noise sources are Liquor Barn, Bread of Life,
Long s, and Pay#" Pak. These are all relatively largo stores
with frequent deliveries, whereas the other small retail stores
in the center only require 1 to 2 deliveries per
week,
deliveries are made with small, relatively craiet delivery vans or
trucks. An 0 ft. high noise control barrier isshown
ow onsgheft.
plans along tproperty line behind the planned
retail $pats. This wall will provide 0 to 10 dB of noise
he
reduction at ground floor recreation areas and living spaces
adjacent to the building. Thus, it is our conclusion that, if
small retail store tenants occupy the planned space, noise
impacts from these stores to neighboring residences will not be
significant.
impacts generated under Phase II of the project
The noise
cannot be thoroughly assessed at this tim¢as noise levels
,
generated by the supermarket will depend on many factors,
including the number and type of trucks making deliveries, peak
on and design of loading dock areas, and
delivery hours, orientati
However, it has been
type and location of mechanical equipment.
r
our experience that supemarkets are usually the most significant
f this type. This is due to
noise source at shopping centers o
ticularly semi -trailer
the high number of delivery trucks, par
trucks, required by supermarkets, as well as to heavy loading
dock activity and extensive mechanical equipment requirements.
Thus, the supermarket represents a potentially significant impact
to nearby residents. Although the impacts cannot be quantified
at this time, typical mitigation measures required for
supermarkets in this setting are given in section II, which can
be used an guidelines until actual impacts can be determined.
I C1.111 W l — f'F4.K Mb'*='
ItL ,.U'.4MO-e-A"AU a17'I Yli
- 16 -
The above report presents the results of our noise impact
assessment for the planned improvements at the Bascom and
Hamilton Center in Campbell. The existing noise impacts have
been determined by field measurements and other data and are
correct to the best of our knowledge. Future noise impacts are
based on current plans and information for the center, and may
differ from future predictions should plans for tare center
change. If you need any additional information or an elaboration
of this report, please contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
EDWAR L. PACK ASS6CIATES, INC-
David W. Poo s
Acoustical Engineer
DWP:YT
Attachments: Appendices A and B
h2EWDIX A
Reis_ Xbnm:
(a) Phase iI Site Plan, Bascom and Ha1990on Center, by
The Hagman Group, dated April ♦,
(b) Noise Element, City of Campbell General Plan, Adopted by
City
(c) Information for Loading Dock operations Provided by
on Store Managers, Hamilton and Bascom Center, by TeAprilEdward L. Pack Associates, Inc., 19, 1990, and b to
Personal Interview, April 17, 1990Y
(d) information on Future Retail Space Tenants Provided by
Bill Hagman, Jr., The Hagman Group, by Telecon to
Edward L. Pack Associates, Inc., April 19, 1990
APPENDIX H
Notes standards Terminoloay. Instrumentation.
Ventilation. and Building Shell Requirements
1. Noise Standards
A. City of Campbell Noise 6tanc'iatdg
The City of Campbell Noise Element specifies the L10 and L50
statistical descriptors for the daytime and nighttime periods to
identify noise levels as "Normally Acceptable" for residential
land use, as follows:
EYnosure
L10
0700-2100
60
Time
Period
hours
dBA
2100-0700
50
hours
dHA
L50
55
dBa
65
dW
The Llo and L5o are those levels that are exceeded for lot
and Sot of the recording time during the measurement period.
..rrt-er a.:x IV:ie�.niu+i �, rrtin its rU:4Ntl=�.]17-Kl101 N1S'� P2k1
2 • Tarmino1IIiLY
A. 6tatistical Noise Levels
Due to the fluctuating character of urban traffic noise,
statiet:.cal procedures are needed t-,. provide an adequate
descriptian of the environment. A series of statistical
descriptors have been developed which represent the noise levels
exceeded a give percentage of the time. These descriptors are
obtained by direct readout of the Community Noise Analyzer. Some
of the statistical levels used to describe community noise are
defined as follows:
L10 -
A noise level exceeded for 10% of the time,
considered to be an "instrusive" level.
L50 -
The noise level
exceeded 50% of the time,
representing an
"average" sound level.
L90 -
The noise level
exceeded 90% of the time,
designated as a
"background" noise level.
1,124 -
The noise level
exceeded for a total period of
one hour over a
24-hour period.
8/24 -
The noise level
exceeded for a total period of
8 hours over a
24-hour period.
.5,124-
The noise level
exceeded for a total period of
1/2 hour over a
24-hour period.
S. A-Weiahted Sound Level
The decibel meajure of the sound level utilizing the "A"
weighted network of a sound level meter is referred to as "dRA".
The "A" weighting is the accepted standard weighting system used
when noise is measured and recorded for the purpose of
determining total noise levels and conducting statistical
analyses of the environment so that the output correlates well
with the response of the human ear.
3. Instrumentation
The on -site field measurement data were acquired by the use
of a Gen Red Company Community Noise Analyzer, which provides a
direct readout of the L exceedance statistical levels including
the equivalent -energy level (Leg). Input to the analyzer was
provided by a microphone extended to a height of 5 ft. above the
ground. The "A" weighting network and the "Fast" response
setting of the analyzer were used in conformance with the
applicable standards. All instrumentation was acoustically
calibrated before and after field tests to assure accuracy.
CITY OF 1650-1800 S. BASCOM S-90-01 4/5
CAMPBELL
ITEM NO. 1
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF April 10, 1990
1. UP 90-03/ Continued Public Hearing to consider the
S 90-01 application of Mr. Deke Hunter, on behalf of Hunter
Hunter Prop. Properties, for approval of a Site and
Architectural Application and to allow the remodel
and expansion of an existing shopping center, on
properties known as 1650-1800 South Bascom Avenue,
in a C-2-S (General Commercial Zoning District.
(Planning Commission action final, unless
appealed.)
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission take the following actions:
1. Grant a Negative Declaration for th:.s project.
2. Adopt a resolution incorporating the attached Findings
approving this protect subject to the attached Conditions of
Approval.
APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL
The applicant seeks approval of Site and Architectural application
to allow the expansion and remodel of an existing shopping center
located on the southeast corner of Hamilton and Bascom Avenues on
a 12.3 net acre site. The applicant had originally submitted a
request for a drive -through restaurant in combination with this
project which required approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The
applicant no longer seeks approval of a Conditional Use Permit at
this time. The proposed project is presented in two phases.
Phase I includes the remodel of the majority of the shopping
center and an expansion of approximately 28,500 sq. ft. of retail
area. Phase proposes a 7,600 sq. ft. addition.
PROJECT DATA
Phase I
Parcel Area: 538,500 sq. ft. Net Acres: 12.3
Gross Floor Area: 153,270
Floor Area Ratio: .28
Building Coverage: 28
Height: 41 ft. Floors: One
Parking:
Required: 731 @ 1:200 retail, 1:350 auto service
Provided: 696 @ 1:21C retail, 1:350 auto se -vice
Deficits: 35
BACKGROUND AND PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The subject property is currently zoned for C-2-S (General
Commercial) and is developed with a 112,00 sq. ft. retail shopping
center and an auto service operation of 9,500 sq. ft. The
applicant intends to remodel the existing shopping center and to
loft
UP 90-03 -2- April 10, 1990
add the following retail areas to the project:
1. A retail pad at the corner of Hamilton and Bascom,
accommodating 10,000 sq. ft. of building area.
2. A retail addition on Hamilton Avenue frontage accommodating
3,500 sq. fr. of retail area.
3. A new retail pad in the south eastern portion of the property
accommodating 15,000 sq. ft. of retail area.
4. A retail addition of 7,600 sq. ft. (Phase II).
The submitted site plan additionally indicates the provision of a
upgraded and restriped parking area for portions of the project
area and the provision of new landscaping and sidewalk
improvements along the Hamilton. Avenue and a portion of the Bascom
Avenue frontage.
Parking: Analysis of the parking and summary of the proposed
parking is attached for the Commission's review. Parking issues
for the project can be summarized as follows:
Existing shopping center 112,000 sq. ft. @ ratio 1:187
Phase I - 140,700 sq. ft. @ parking ratio 1:210
Phase II - 148,300 sq. ft. @ parking ratio 1:209
The Planning Coriission under Section 21.50.040 has the authority
to adjust the parking requirements and standards when it
deterrines that .rcumstances are such as to warrant an
adjustment.
Lh m'Dv �� ZLuiING CpNSISTHNCY
A.T'General Plan Designation: The site is designated for a
commercial land use on the Land Use Element of the City's
General Plan. The proposed retail and auto ser•ice uses are
consistent with the General Plan designation.
B. Zoning Designation: The site i zoned for C-2-S (General
Commercial) uses. ,he proposed uses are consistent with the
commercial zoning of the property.
PISCUSS1 1M
SITE PLAN. The plan presents a reasonable site layout and on -site
circulation.
BUILDING ELEVATIONS: The remodel of the existing shopping center
would add the provision of a metal roof element and painted metal
framing throughout the project. The building elevations are
accented with a variety of architectural entry elements through
the use of towered building elements and canvas awnings. The new
retail buildings incorporate similar building materials and style
and represents an interesting well-proportioned design.
_3- April 10, 1990
UP 90-03
PARKING: The applicant's traffic engineer has prepared the
attached parking analysis which supports a parking ratio of
approximately 1:220 for the proposed retail uses. The applicant's
proposal currently provides a parking ratio of 1:210 for the
proposed retail uses. Staff is of the opinion that an adjustment
to the parking standard is warranted in the situation due to the
size of the shopping center, tThe provision cf bus duckouts
facilitating mass transit use and the provision of pedestrian
walkways on site facilitating pedestrian use.
LANDSCAPING: In conjunction with this proposal, ',he applicant is
indicating provision of a landscaping element alongthestreet
frontage which currently does not exist. The applicant
additionally is indicating a desire to remove the existing trees
in the parking area 'and to replace them with a more appropriate
tree type, as well as the introduction of tree wells within the
parking area.
TRAFFIC: The applicant has prepared traffic analysis of th=
proposed retail exnansion which has been reviewed by the Public
Works Department. This report concludes that there is not a
significant traffic impact as a result of this proposed retail
expansion.
rs
The Architectural Advisor comments that this will be a substantial
improvement to the existing center and that the building and site
Design are acceptable.
RFCp�gip,�(Q1�TNK/ UMMMRY
proposal-- consistent with the General Plan and
Staff finds the pro
Zoning and that the presented plans with the following
modifications will provide an acceptable upgrade and expansion of
the shopping center. Staff is recommending Condition #1 which
Site nd
-_equires the submittal of revised plans tothee
efollowing concerns:
Architectural. Review Committee addressing
1. The provision of a pedestrian walkway towards the
southerly end of the project along the entry driveway.
2. The provision of bus duckouts along the Bascom and
Hamilton Avenues frontages.
3. Provision of a masonry precast 6 ft. wall and possible
landscape area along the easterly and southerly property
lines abutting adjacent residential uses.
4. The review and further design of the loading area for
the proposed 15,000 sq. ft. retail building providing a
more adequate screen and buffer to adjacent residential
uses.
UP 90-03 -4- April 10, 1990
5. Provision of screened trash enclosures throughout the
project servicing the retail and commercial uses.
6. The provision of a landscape walkway element along the
portion of the existing retail building, and
7. The introduction of tree wells within the diagonal
parking area.
Attachments:
1. Recommended Findings
2. Conditions of Approval
3. Staff Review of Parking Based Upon Current ?arki.ng Standards
4. Parking Analysis for Proposed Retail and Expansion Prepared by
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. dated April 4, 1990 .
5. Traffic Analysis Prepared by Berton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
(Letter dated 4/4/90 and Report dated 1/30190).
6. Development Schedule Requested by Applicant
7. Exhibits.
1 r r
Submitted by:
Tim J. Ha ey - Planner II
Approved by: Steve Piasecki
Planning Director
f:pcstfrpt/keyprod: staffrpt
FINDINGS
UP 90-0'
Planniij Commission Meeting of April 10, 1990
Site and A;-chitectural Approval
1. Scale: The proposed project is an appropriate scale in
relationship to the adjacent developed uses.
2. Design: The project is well designed and architecturally blends
into the neighborhood. The remodeled buildings are an
improvement.
3. Parkin: Provided parking ratio of 1:210 for retail eases is
considered acceptable due to the size of shopping center,
accessibility to public transit and provision of pedestrian
walkways.
4. Compatibility: The project is designed to minimize infringement
on neighboring properties with the addition of screen walls.
5. Landscaping: Substantial landscaping has been provided which adds
to the aesthetics of the project with the introduction of tree
wells and street frontage landscaping.
6. The proposed project, subject to the conditions imposed, will be
consistent with the General Plan; and
8. The proposed project, subject to the required conditions, will aid
in the harmonious development of the immediate area.
: • r
CONDITIONS O? APPROVAL - FILE / UP 90-03
SITE ADDRESS: 1650-1800 South Bascom Avenue
APPLICANT: D. Hunter
PC MTG DATE: April 10, 1990
Page 1
The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that
he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with
the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of
California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she
is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the
City of Campbell and the State of California which pertain to this
development and are not herein specified.
1. Revised elevations andjor site plan indicating items per Staff
comment sheet to be submitted to the Planning Department and
approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or the
Planning Commission prior to application for a building permit.
2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in
red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in
accordance with the approved plans.
3. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and
location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning
Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review
Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to issuance of a
building permit.
4. Fencing plan and lighting indicating location and design details
to b. submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the
Planning Director prior to issuance of a Building Permit.
5. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the
amount of $40,000 to ensure landscaping, fencing, and striping of
parking areas within 3 months of completion of construction; or
(2) file a written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing, and
striping of parking areas. Bond or agreement to be filed with the
Planning Department prior to application for a Building Permit.
6. Applicant to submit a letter to the Planning Department, prior to
installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the
location of the boxes and screening (if boxes are above ground)
for approval of the Planning Director.
7. All mechanical equipment on roofs And all utility meters to be
screened as approved by the Planning Director.
S. Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements
are installed.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE / UP 90-03
SITE ADDRESS: 1650-1600 South Bascom Avenue
APPLICANT: D. Hunter
PC MTG DATE: April 10, 1990
Page 2
9. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with
Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces
to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards.
10. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section
20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code.
11. Plans submitted to the Building Division for a plan check shall
indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground
utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and
television cables, etc.
12. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of
them Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until
application is approved and permit issued by the Planning and
Building Departments (Section 21.53 of the Campbell. Municipal
Code).
13. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that
any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage,
wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of
Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This
requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple
apartment units; to all commercial, business, industrial,
manufacturing, and construction establishments.
14. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the
development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire
Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosures(s) shall consist
of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or Fence and have
self -closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department.
Ali encicsures to be constructed at grade level and have a level
area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these
containers.
15. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City
requirements for the handicapped.
16. Provide two bus duckouts with concrete pads as approved by City's
Engineer in Phase I.
Public Works
17. Obtain an encroachment permit. pay fees, and pest surety for
relocating driveways, constructing curb gutter and sidewalks and
for any other work required in the public right-of-way.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE I UP 90-03
SITE ADDRESS: 1650-1800 South Bascom Avenue
APPLICANT: D. Hunter
PC NTG DATE: April 10, 1990
Page 3
18. Provide five sets of grading and drainage plans for new building
sites. Show how overall drainage of site works, including
alleyway.
19. Adjust parking adjacent to bus duckout on Bascom Avenue.
20. Provide support to show that reduced parking ratio will be
adequate to support proposed use.
Building Department
21. A sidewalk should be added at the south entry approach to keep the
handicapped and pedestrians out of the drive path of automobiles.
It is also required in current handicapped regulations.
Planning Department
22. a) Phase I construction to commence by February 1, 1991.
b) Phase II construction to commence by February 1, 1998.
Staff Review of Parking Based Upon Current Parking Standards
Review of parking based upon current parking standards.
EXISTING CONDITION
Reauired
Retail 112,175 @ 1:200 = 561 spaces
Auto 9,500 @ 1:350 = 27 spaces
588
Provided 626 spaces 38 surplus
Retail Ratio 1:187
PHASE I
Reauired
Retail 140,770 @ 1:200 = 704
Auto 9,500 @ 1:350 = 27
731
Provided 697 spaces (reflecting bus duckouts) - Deficit 34
Retail Ratio 1:2i0
PHASE �I
Reauired
Retai-. 148,370 @ 1:200 = 742
Autc 9,500 @ 1:350 = 27
769
Provided: 734 spaces (reflecting bus duckouts) - Deficit 35
Retail Ratio 1:209
Exhibit 3
HAGMAN
APRIL 5, 1990
BASCCM 6 HMULTON RETAIL
89100
PHASDG SCHEME
PHASE ONE - AS SHOWN CN PHASE I SITE PLAN. COMIISIM NO LATER 7R4,1
FEBRIARY 1, 1991.
PRASE 'IW� - AS SW)W ON PHASE II SITE PLAN. C.][ UNCE NO li,TER
THAN 1998.
r,PR - ,,1990
UITY ❑F CA,,4PBE:LL
PLANNlf.O DEPARTMENT
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
_ aoa 280-e800
too Park Center Plaza Suite 450 San Jose. Cahtornia 95113
April 4, 1990
Mr. Deke Hunter
Hunter Properties,
i90o The Alameda, Suite 606
San Jose, califimia 95126
I PR 1391)
CITY OF CAMPBELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Re: Parfdrrg A.*,., fa RoP._d R_U F.rpanarlon at Bas— Avenue and Hamilton Awalut
Dear Deke.
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. has conducted a preliminary parking analysis for the proposed
ecpansion of the shopping center on tile southeast quadrant of the intersection of Bascom Avenue
and Hamilton Avenue in Campbell, California. The purpose of this analysis is to determine
whether the proposed parking supply is sufficient to meet the projected parking demand. The
existing center has approximately 112 500 s.f. of retail space. The expansion will take place in four
locations to be completed in two phases. The first phase has a pro;xted completion date in 1990
and contains 10.000 s.f. of space to be constructed in a separate building on the northwest corner
of the site, 15,000 s.f. of space to be constructed in a separate building on the southeast corner of
the site, and 3,500 s.f. of space to be added to the northern end of the center for a total of 141,000
s.f. The second phase has a projected completion date of 1995 and contains 7,600 s.f. to be added
to the southern end of tite center. The totalsize of the cnter A total be 000 29 spaces will be
e end of
Phase 2. In the first phase 681 parking spa-.esprovided.
provided at the end of Phase 2.
The projected parking demand for the two phases were estimated by applying peak -parking demand
rates to the sizes of the center with the expansions. The peak rates were obtained from the
Institute of Transportation Engineer's Parldng Generation manual. The peak -parking demand for
shopping centers occurs on Saturdays. ThP Saturday parking rate from the manual is 3.97 spaces
per 1,o00 s.f. of gross leasable area (GLA). The results are presented in Table 1. The projected
parking demand for Phase 1 is 560 spaces. For Phase 2, the projected demand is 590 spaces.
U
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
Mr. Deke Hunter
April 4, 1990
Page 2
TABLE I
PROJECTED PARKING DEMANDS
Demand (Spaces)
Phase
560
Phase I 141,000 s.f. GLA
590
Phase II 148,600 s.f. GLA —
In a retail development, the parking supply should exceed the parking demand by 10 to 15 percent
to allow for turnover. Therefore, the recommended parking supplies are 640 spaces for Phase 1 and
681
aces
r Phase 1 and 729
28exceed theorecon mended supplies and shoulPhase 2). The provided park:ng d be be sufficient ntf oto meet the peak -parking demandces for s.
If you have any questions regarding the results of this analysis, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely,
BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
�� ne A. Bierstedt
senior Associate
JAB/LM783' WP6:mdb
5911.04.04
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
100 Park Center Plaza Slate 450 San Jose. California 95113 408-?80-6600
April 4, 1990 � O 9.^ r,E D
LCAPR - i, 1990
C1Ty pF CAMPBELL
Mr. Deke Hunter
PL-NNING DEPARTMENT
Hunter Properties
1900 The Alameda, Suite 606
San Jose, California 95126
Re: Dip Gtnernayort C.anproiron of McDmWUN , Restaurant ord Refaf/ Vp .Ce
Dear Deke
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. has conducted a preliminary comparison of the trip generating
characteristics of a 5,000-square foot McDor ald's restaurant versus 28,500 s.f. of retail space for the
shopping center at the intersection of Bascof t and Hamilton Avenues in Campbell, California. The
trip generation estimates for the restaurant are presented in Table 1. The estimates for the retail
space are presented in Table 2. The trip generation rates used in our traffic analysis dated January
30, 1990 were used to make the comparison.
TABLE 1
TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES FOR MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT
Peak Hour Rate Trip;: Passby % Primary Trips Passby Trips
Morning 58.3 290 80 60 230
Midday 99.8 500 60 200 300
Evening 49.5 250 55 I10 140
The retail space is projected to generate fewer total trips and fewer primary trips than the
restaurant during all three peak hours. It will therefore have less of a traffic impact.
t—J
Berton-A*ch,n.n Associates, Inc.
Mr. peke Hunter
Apra 4, 1990
Page 2
TABLE 2
TRIP GENERATION ESTIMATES FOR RETAIL SPACEPrimary
Passby Trips
Rate' Trips Passby °�
Trips
11
Peace2c
32
1.5 43
Morning �
79 26
Midday 3.7 105
25
36
106
Evening 5.0 142
a. From the Phase III evaluation.
please do not hesitate to call.
If you have any questions,
Sincerely,
BARTON-AsCHMAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
Janke A. Bierstedt
senior Associate
JAB/LM784'WP6imdb
5911.04.04
DRAFT
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
FOR
PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER EXPANSION
IN
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
Prepared For.
Hunter Properties
Prepared By:
Barton•Aschuran Associates, Inc
FEJ � D
January 30, 1990
airy OF
CA
PLANNI ND D[PAgi e[ 1.
1.
INTRODI IC11ON
This report presents the results of a traffic analysis conducted for a proposed McDonald's restau-
rant and retail space to be added to the shopping center located on the southeast quadrant of the
intersection of Bascom Avenue and Hamilton Avenue in Campbell, California. The site location is
shown on Figure 1. The proposed expansion will be built in three phases:
Phase 1 (1990): 5,000-s.f. McDonald's restaurant;
Phase 2 (1995): 4,000-s.f. retail expansion; and
Phase 3 (2000): 20,000-s.f. retail expansion.
The purpose of the analysis is to evaluate the impacts of the expansion on the operation of the
intersection of Bascom Avenue and Hamilton Avenue, to evaluate the impacts of traffic generated
by the restaurant on the adjacent driveways, and to determine if the parking supply near the res-
taurant is suYicient.
RECEOVED
FE: ,
CITY OF CAMPBELL
PLANNING O[PMTN[NT.
2.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The project site is located at one of the busiest intersections in Santa Clara County, Bascom
Avenue and Hamilton Avenue. Bascom Avenue is a six -lane arterial that runs in a north -south
direction and carries 49,000 vehicles per day. Hamilton Avenue is a four- to six -lane arterial that
runs in an east -west direction and carries 46,000 vehicles per day. The existing operating condi-
tions of the intersection, the existing volumes using the driveways closest to the restaurant site, and
the existing parking conditions near the restaurant site are described in this chapter.
EXISTING OPERATIONS OF BASCOM AND HAMILTON
Level of service (LOS) is a term used to describe an intersection's operation. It can range from
Level A, or free -flow conditions with low delays, to Level. F, or jammed conditions with excessive
delays. An acceptable level is usually defined as Level of Service D or better. An intersection's
LOS in the City of Campbell is based on the average stopped delay per vehicle. Descriptions of
the various levels and their corresponding ranges of delay are presented in Table 1.
Level of service circulations were performed using the NCAP software package and the module
based on the Operations and Design method from the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. The most
important inputs to the calculations are traffic volumes for each movement, lane configurations.
and traffic signal timings and phasings. These inputs were obtained from the City of Campbell for
the AM peak hour, midday peak hour, and PM peak hour. The volumes are shown on Figure 2.
The results of the LOS calculations are presented in Table 2.
The intersection is currently operating at Level of Service B during the AM peak hour, Level of
Service D during the midday peak hour, and Level of Service E during the PM peak hour. The
intersection is currently operating at at. unacceptable level during the PM peak hour.
EXISTING DRIVEWAY OPERATIONS
At present, there is one driveway on Hamilton Avenue and two driveways on Bascom Avenue near
the site of the proposer: restaurant. The number of vehicles entering and exiting the driveways
were counted on January 24, 1990. The AM, midday, and PM peak -hour volumes are shown on
Figure 3.
-3-
IMORNING
NAMILTON M
�tr
:aA
1
1
MIDDAY
HAMILTON 677
r fM
�tr
I
EVENING
�i
Jll.
HAMILTON lm-
7
r l0�1
�r- $
�Tr
Fip,m2
EXISTING VOLUMES
AT
BASOOM
AND HAMILTON
TABLE I
LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
Average Stopped Delay
Level Description
Service
per Vehicle (Sac.1
A operations nth very low ddays NO approach Phase
lb is fuutd ed. Turrmg movements art easily made
Less than 5 0
and drivers futd freedom of operation.
B Operations with low delays. An occasional approach
5 Ito 15 0
Phase a utd aed and vehicle Platoon form.
A few vehicles wait Is.l to 25.0
C Operations
udaverage ddaystton Bamay occur behind
ipckups
me red
longer than one
tunung vehicles
D Operations with tolerable delays_ Manv vehicles stop.
25.1 to 40.0
Delays may be substantial during short periods-
E Operations with intolerable delays. Vehicles wait
40.1 to 60.0
tough several red indication. Long queues may
form.
P Operation with delays unacceptable to most driven
Greater than 60.0
occurring due to oversaturatmm. poor Progression.
or very long cycle lengths. Backups from other
locations restrict or prevent movement.
„� Capes - iry Manua(. Special Report 209, (Washing-
ton, D.C., 1985) Pp.
TABLE 2
EXISTING INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE
AM Peak Hour Noon Pcak Hour PM Peak Hour
Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay) LOS
(Sam.) (Secs-)
13.4 B 29.6 D 41.9 E
PARKING CONDTfiONS
/ r
The parking area near the proposed restaurant site contains 168 parking spaces. Spot surveys
were conducted In 1) the be
1989 to measure the existing parking demand during the peak retail
53
season.
vehicles were obser edrtThe observed vehicles were peak -parking demandcorresponds to the 42 perceen, of
the supply.
-5-
Q
N-i L-- -
HAWLTON AV
r-�
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
1
1
I
1
f*00-3
KEY:
W. 00, 00 • AM, NOON. !M PEAK
EXISTING DRIVEWAY VOLUME
3.
PHASE 1 CONDITIONS
The impacts of the Phase 1 expansion, the McDonaid's restaurant to be built in 1990, are ad-
dressed in this chapter. The restaurant will contain approximately 5.000 s.f. with 150 seats and a
drive -through , e traffic analysis evaluates the impacts of the restaura
windowThnt on three items: 2) the opeations
1) the operations of the intersection of Bascom Avenue and Hamilton Avenue, -
of the adjacent driveways, and 3) the parking conditions. Each of these items is addressed Lions
rately. First, the process used to estimate the amount of traffic generated by the restaurant and to
assign it to the roadway system is discussed.
MC DONALD S RESTAURANT TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS
Traffic projections for the McDonald's restaurant were estimated using the three -step process of
trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment. In the first step, trip generation, the amoun!
of traffic entering and exiting the site during the AM, midday, and PM peak hours was estimated.
This step also included an estimate of the amount of passby or diverted traffic, or traffic that would
normally pass the sire on its usual route and did not make a special trip to the restaurant. The
remaining trips are primary trips --trips made by vehicles solely for the purpose of going to the
restaurant. In the second step, trip distribution, the directions of approach and departure antici-
pated to be used by the restaurant traffic was projected. The restaurant traffic was assigned to the
roadway system in the last step.
Trip Generation
The amount of traffic generated by a restaurant is estimated by applying an appropriate trip
generation rate to the size of the restaurant. Trip generation rates were obtained from surveys
conducted by Barton-Aschman at McDonald's restaurants in the Chicago area. The selected rates
are 58.3 trips per 1,000 st during the AM peak hour, 99.8 trips per 1.000 st during the midday
peak hour, and 49.5 trips per 1,000 st during the PM peak hour. Applying these rates to the
proposed size of 5,000 s.f. yields 290 AM peak -hour trips, 500 midday peak -hour trips, and 250 Phf
peak -hour trips. It is further estimated that half of these trips will be inbound and half will be
outbound. Not all of these trips will be new trips added to the surrounding roadways. Some of
these trips will be generated by vehicles that pass by the site. The percentages of passby trips were
obtained from the results of surveys. It is estimated that 80 percent of the AM trips, 60 percent of
the midday trips, and 55 percent of the PM trips will be passby trips. The trip generation process
is summarized in Table 3.
a
TABLE 3
PHASE 1 TRIP GENERATION PROCESS
Peak Hour Rate Trips Passby % Primary Trips Passby Trips
Morning 583 290 80 60 230
Midday 99.8 500 60 200 300
Evening 49.5 250 55 110 140
Trip Distribution
The directions used by the traf5c to approach and depart the site is based on the relative locations
of residential neighborhoods and employment centers and on the existing traffic patterns near the
site. The estimated directions of approach and departure for both the primary and passby trips
during the prak hours are summarized below.
Morning Midday Evening_
Primary Passby Primary Passby Primary Passby
North 15% 10% 20% 20% 20% 15%
East 35% 10% 30% 20% 20% 15%
South 35% 60% 25% 30% 35% 35%
West 15% 20% 25% 30% 25% 35%
Trip Assignment
Both primary and passby trips were assigned to the driveways and to the intersection of Bascom
Avenue and Hamilton Avenue for the AM, midday, and PM peak hours. The net added and
subtracted (due to changes in travel paths of passby trips) for the three time periods are shown on
Figure 4.
PHASE 1 OPERATIONS OF BASCOM AND HAMILTON
The impacts of traffic generated by the restaurant on the intersection of Bascom Avenue and
Hamilton Avenue were evaluated with level of service calculations. The calculations were conduct-
ed for two scenarios-
1) Phase 1 Background Conditions, or conditions just prior to the completion
of the restaurant, with existing volumes, traffic projections from approved
but not constructed or occupied developments, and diversion to the Cam-
pisi/Creekside connection; and
2) Phase 1 Project Conditions, with traffic from background conditions plus
traffic from the restaurant.
-8-
PARKING EVALUATION demand rates found in
The parking demand of the restaurant was estimated by applying parking
The Institute of Transportation Engineers Parking Generation m50 vehicles during The restaurant ring the PMpeak
Projectedto generate 65 parked vehicl- during the midday peak hour and
period. Adding the restaurant's parking demand to the existing parking demand yields a total
Parking demand of 136 spaces during the midday period and 133 spaces during the M period.
The supply of 109 spaces is more that: sufficient to accommodate the projected e a parking
demand after completion of the Mclk>nald's restaurant. The midday demand w� a�O�^O
dated by existing spaces in the remainder of the center.
13-
4.
PHASE 2 CONDf i IONS
The impacts of Phase 2, :he first of the retail expansions, are described in this chapter. Phase 2
contains 4,000 s.f. of retail space to be located at the northern end of the center. First, the process
used to estimate the amount of traffic generated by the retail expansion and to assign it to the
roadway system is addressed. Next, the impacts o! the traffic on the intersection of Hamilton
Avenue and Bascom Avenue are present-d.
PHASF 2 TRAFFIC PROJECTION
Traffic projections for the retail expansion were estimated using the same •h-ee-step process of
trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment used to estimate traffic ui the McDonald's
restaurant.
Trip Generation
The amount of traffic generated by a retail expansion is estimated by & ,plying an appropriate trip
generation rate to the size of the expansion area. The existing center contains 112.300 st of retail
area. With the expansion, the center will be a total of 1!6,300 s.f. Trip generation rates from the
ITE Trip Generation manual for the size of the center after the expansion were applied to the
expansion size. The selected rates are 1.6 trips per 1,000 st during the AM peak hour, 4.3 trips
per 1,000 st during the midday peak hour, and 5.8 trips per 1,000 st during the PM peak hour.
Applying these rates to the proposed size of 4,000 s.f. yields 6 AM peak -hour trips, 17 midday
peak -how trips, .nd 23 PM peak -hour trips. It is further estimated that during the AM peak hour,
70 percent of the trips will be inbound and 30 percent outbound. During the midday and PM peak
hours, 50 percent of the trips will be inbound and 50 percent will be outbound.
Not all of these trips will be new trips added to the surrounding roadways. Some of these trips will
be generated by vehicles t pass by the site. It is estimated that 25 percent of the AM trips,
midday trips, and PM trips will be passby trips. The trip generation process is summarized in
Table 5.
14-
• 9
TABLE 5
PHASE 2 TRIP GENERATION PROCESS
Peak Hour Rate Trips Passby % Primay Trips Passby Trips
Morning 1.6 6 25 4 2
Midday 4.3 17 25 13 4
Evening 5.8 23 25 17
Trip Distribution
The directions used by the traffic to approach and depart the site is based on the relative locations
of residential neighborhoods and employment centers and on the existing traffic patterns near the
site. The estimated directions of approach and departure for both the primary and passby trips
iduring the peak hours are summarized below.
Morning _ Midday Evening
IPrimary Passby Primary Passby Primary Passby 1
North 15% 20% 20% 20% 20% 15%
East 35% 20% 30% 20% 20% 15%
South 35% 40% 25% 30% 35% 35% 1
West 15% 20% 25% 30% 25% 35% i
I Trip Assignment
I Both primar, and passby trips were assigned to the intersection of Bascom Avenue and Hamilton
Avenue for the AM, midday, and PM peak hours. The net added and subtracted (due to changes
in travel paths of passby trips) for the three time periods are shown on Figure 7.
IPHASE 2 OPERATIONS OF BASCOM AND HAMILTON
I The impacts of traffic generated by the retail expansion on the intersection of Bascom Avenue and
Hamilto. Avenue were evaluated with level of service calculations based on the Planning method
found in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. The method was used because of the five-year
completion period. This method !imply evaluates an intersection as under capacity, near capacity,
and over capacity. The capacity criteria are presented in Table 6.
-15-
MORNING
Jl�
HAMILTON 1 L
}
I
I
€`
MI DDAY
HAMILTON .-
�- 2
�tr
I I EVENING
IHAMILTON i "'►
7 � �-2
�tr
tl�
I
FiNUM7
a
1 PHASE 2 EXPANSION TRIPS
(4,000 s.f. of Retail)
TABLE 6
CAPACITY CRITERIA FOR PLANNING ANALYSIS OF SIGNALIZED INTERSEC nONS
Critical Volume for Relationship to
Intersection, vph Probable Capacity
0 to 1,200 Under Capacity
1,201 to 1,400 Near Capacity
Greater than 1,401 Over Capacity
Source: Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, (Washing-
ton, D.C., 1995) pp 9-21.
As with Phase I conditions, the level of service calculations were conducted for background and
project conditions. The traffic volumes for background conditions comprised existing volumes
multiplied by a growth rate for each approach for five years. The growth rates were obtained from
the City of Campbell's transportation planning model. Traffic from the Phase 1 expansion was
added. The rescdting Phase 2 background volumes are shown on Figure 8. Volumes for Phase 2
project conditions comprise the volumes on Figure 7 plus the volumes on Figure 8. The results of
the LOS calculations are presented in Table 7.
c
TABLE 7
PHASE 2 INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE
Morning Midday Evening
Scenario
Background Conditions Over Capacity Over Capacity Over Capacity
Project Conditions Over Capacity Over Capacity Over Capacity
The intersection is projected to be over capacity for both background and project conditions
during all three time periods. The project is estimated to add 0.0 percent to the critical volumes
during the AM peak hour, 0.2 percent during the midday peak hour, and 0.2 percent during the
evening peak hour. The project is adding Tess than 1.0 percent to the critical voiumes. Therefore,
it will have an insignificant impact on the intersection of Bascom Avenue and Hamilton Avenue.
17.
MORNING
J1�
HAMILTON asp y .— ,.0
uo� ar
�tr
MIDDAY
HAMILTON now ~ low
7907 no
oil
lit
Ii
E1v-mING
I3 R
370 > Ic_ Z71
I HAMILTON na-. h 117!
70 7 r 4"
�tr
i
FipIN
PHASE 2 BACKGROUND VOLUMES
S.
PHASE 3 CONDITIONS
The impacts of Phase 3, the second of the retail expansions, are described in this chapter. Phase 3
contains 20,000 st of retail space to be located at the southern end of the center. First, the proc-
ess used to estimate the amount of traffic generated by the retail expansion and to assign it to the
roadway system is addr_ssed. Next, the impacts of the traffic on the intersection of Hamilton
Avenue and Bascom Avenue are presented.
PHASE 3 TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS !
I I
Traffic projections for the retail expansion were estimated using the same three -step process of
trip generation. trip distribution, and trip assignment used to estimate traffic for the McDonald's
Irestaurant and the Phase 2 expansion.
Trip Generation
The amount of traffic generated by a retail expansion is estimated by applying an appropriate trip
generation rate to the size of the expansion area. With the second expansion, the center will be a
I total of 136,300 s.t. Trip generation rates for retail centers decrease as the size of the cente- in-
creases. Trip generation rates from the I E Trip Generation manual for the size of the center after
the expansion were applied to the expansion size. The selected rates are 1.5 trips per 1.000 s.f.
during the AM peak hour, 3.7 trips per 1,000 st during the midday peak hour, and 5.0 trips per
I 1.000 st during the PM peak hour. Applying these rates to the proposed size of 20,000 s.f. yields
30 AM peak -hour trips, 74 midday peak -hour trips, and 100 PM peak -hour trips. It is further
estimated that during the AM peak hour, 70 percent of the trips will be inbound and 30 percent
outbound. During the midday and PM peak hours, 50 percent of these trips will be inbound and 50
percent will be outbound.
Not all of these trips will be new trips added to the surrounding roadways. Some of these trips will
be generated by vehicles that pass by the site. It is estimated that 25 percent of the AM trips.
midday trips, and PM trips wW be passby trips. The trip generation process is summarized in
Table 8.
s
TABLE 8
PHASE 3 TRIP GENERATION PROCESS
IPeak Hour Rate Trips Passby % Pt imary Trips Passby Trips
Morning 1.5 30 25 22 8
Middav 3.7 74 25 56
Evening 5.0 100 25 76 24
Trip Distribution
It was estimated that the Phase 3 traffic would use the same directions as Phase 2 traffic to ap-
proach and depart the site.
Trip Assignment
Both primary and passby trips were assigned to the intersection of Bascom Avenue and Hamilton
Avenue for the AM, midday, and PM peak hours. The net added and intravelsubtracted (due to changes
travel paths of passby trips) for the three time periods are shownon Figure 9.
IPHASE 3 OPERATIONS OF BASCOM AND HAMILTON
I The impacts of traffic generated by the retail expansion on the intersection of Bascom Avenue and
Hamilton Avenue were evaluated with level of service calculations based on the Planning method
found in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual. The method was used because of the ten-year
completion period.
IAs with Phase 2 conditions, the level of service calculations were conducted for background and
project conditions. The traffic volumes for background conditions comprise existing volumes
I multiplied by a growth rate for each approach for ten years. The growth rates were obtained from
the City of Camphell's transportation planning model. Traffic from the Phase 1 and Phase 2
expansions was added. The resulting Pltase 3 background volumes are shown on Figure 10
I Phase 3 project volumes comprise the volumes on Figure 9 plus the volumes on Figure 10. The
results of the LOS calculations are presented in Table 9.
TABLE 9
' PHASE 3 INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE
Scenario Morning Midday
Evening
IBackground Conditions Over Capacity Over Capacity Over Capacity
Project Conditions Over Capacity Over Capacity Over Capacity
IAs with Phase 2, the intersection is projected to be over capacity. The Phase 3 expansion is pro-
jected to add 0.0 percent to the critical movements during the AM peak hour, 0.7 percent during
I the midday peak hour, and 0.95 percent during the PM ppeeaak hour. Phase 3 will add leas than one
percent to the critical volumes and will not cause a significant impact.
MORNING
Jib
NAMIITON ' L
� �- IL
�tr
MIDDAY
Jl�
MYIIITON 7-0 IY
7 1!
�tr
t
EVENING
�
J1�
L
MAMIITON top
� ` 14
4
�tr
F *IIN
PHASE 3 EXPANSION TRIPS
(20,000 s.f. of Retail)
J1�
K"ILTON a"
�tr
I
MIDDAY
I J1�
.�
r-.N
I �tr
I
I all EVENING
Iwrw�rm r. "� t a"
~� I s::
)Tr
Fps
PHASE 3 13ACKGROU14D fi""10
VOLUMES
C-pball Planning Dq—tm— April 4, 1990
70 N. First SCTreet
Cetball, d1 95008 Beeom 4 Remilton
89001
Tin Nary
Parking Ratios
11 ' Atl rt Usti (YMltlnr,a
Retail 112,175
Auto 9,429
Parking Required: 561
5"
Perkiiq Pccvided: 666
Not: 76 over
Retail Retint 112,175 q.ft.
639 apmee
5.70/1000 eq.rt.
1/175 q. ft.
9AW.1
Retail 140,770
Autu 9,429
Parking Required: 704
731
Parking Provided: 709
Net: 22 Under
Retail Ratio: 140,770 eq.tt.
682 epeaes
4.94/1000 q.rt.
V206 eq.it.
-00-tldlf
;099rrc'80r:0N �31 dT] r%ew 3M1°91_fl61
MOND
April 4, 1990
Pegs wo
Retail
148,370
Auto
9,429
Parking FATILc+ed:
742
769
Perking Provided: 734
Net:
35 under
Retail Ratio:
148,370 q.ft.
707 epsom
4.77/1000 q.ft.
W210 q.ft.
W: Scott Lee
a: Deka Hinter
'0e cLLt7 S089"zwv:ON -131 d ods NrWSUi 311:41 6S:SI @6.-O'B-tld1
DEPARTMENT COMMENT SHEET
SITE i ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW CO;.iMITTEE
PLANNING COMMISSIOII
Date Sent Out: tlar•rh 20 19g0 [ 1 Architect
Planning Commission [ 1 Fire Department
Agenda Date: April 10,19!10 [ j Police Department
Please Return By: Marrh 26 14g0** [ j Redevelopment Agency
Public Works Department:
[ 1 Original Submittal [ j Engineerinir
l I Corporation- Yard
[XI Revised Submittal [ ) Building Division
APPLICANT: 1jr nat,a H ntar TELEPHONE: 248-2600
PROJECT ADDRESS: 765g_1R00 t Bascom Ave,
PROPOSAL:
IMP 90-G1 Public hearing to consider the application of Mr. Deke Hunter for approval
S 90-01 of a site and architectural application to allow the remodel and expansion
of an existing shopping center on properties known as 1650-1800 S.
Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S(General Commercial) Zoning District. APN:288-11-1,2,
4,5,56
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS:
roraciccle.Sv�otsl
rrdn<•vn
CODE REQUIREMENTS (IF RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL):
Piov,de bo< ic<j t FC a rf( ' S.rJ,hr ,n Phdui
rc%dcrucrw,� rensfru<fino�ib <� //. .,r{ c,�rua[ c cn<l
lr �nr olt,ri i r� rfb„rrr[ ivy a,A
la - flo&adr u?- seh aj rrn<a,ne an<� clie,n041'e
Sit<S. S/+oeJ how Duet,//re,nf! f1 S 1nrL� -
IT- A�,Alf rtuVr -/•%,nlrn;•' >b O�< ClUrf Aa-f drt QV<r- ✓
to Pitu,dr s ,� rf shr;) Ilia' leduefd 0,i,A-,rr< 'abo ri A_ ,d,; 07A
r✓ > < c' C
1
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The Planning Department has conducted an initial environmental study for this
proposal, and
[XI A Negative Declaration has been prepared :or this proposal.
[ I A Categorical Exemption has been prepared for this proposal.
If your Department is of the opinion that additional environmental review ie required,
please attach c Environmental Impact Assessment Initjal Study Identifying your
area(s)�` concern.
**Any environmental comments should be returned by:
70 N O R T H F I R S T STREET
C A M P 8 E L L, CALIFORNIA 95008
(40 s) 866-2100
Department: Planning March 27, 1990
iO: Deke Hunter
Hunter Properties
1900 The Alameda #606
San Jose, CA 95126
FILE NO: S 90-01/UP 90-03 ADDRESS: 1650-1800 S. Bascom Avenue
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Expansion of Existing Shopping Center
SITE 6 ARCHITEC'."URAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT TIME: ')ate: Tuesday, Apirl 3, 1990
Time: 8:00 a.m.
(or shortly thereafter)
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: Tuesday, April 10, 1990
7:30 p.m. (or shortly thereafter)
Please be advised that the Site and Architectural Review Committee of
the Campbell Planning Commission will review your plans for approval of
the above -referenced project at the indicated appointment time. The
meeting will be held in the Planning Conference Room, North Wing, City
Hall, 70 N. First Street, Campbell, California.
The Committee Chairman will then make a recommendation to the Planning
Commission at the Commission meeting which will be held at 7:30 n.m.,
on the referenced date, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 70 N. First
Street, Campbell, California.
A copy of the Staff Report and the Agenda for `he Planning Commission
meeting will be mailed to you on Friday, April 6, 1990.
It is necessary that you, or an authorized representative, be present
at both the Site and Architectural Review Committee meeting and
Planning Commission meeting. If you havo questions regarding this
information, please contact the Planning Office at (408) 866-2140.
Sincerely,
Tim J. Aley
Planner II
Planning Commission Minutes, March 13, 1990
UP 90-03/S 90-01
Page 1 of 1
UP 90-03/S 90-01 Public Hearing to consider the application of
Hunter Properties Mr. Deke Hunter. for approval of a Site and
Architectural Application and a Conditional Use
Permit to allow the expars.on and remodel of an
existing shopping center and the construction of
a drive -through restaurant on properties known as
1650-1800 South Bascom Avenue, in a C-2 S
(General Commercial) Zoning District. (Planning
Commission action final, unless appealed.)
Chairperson Perrine read the application into record.
Director Piasecki presented Staff report date: 3/13/90.
Commissioner Alne asked if Robway Avenue would be opened through to the
shopping center to which he received a negative reply.
Commissioner Olszewski would like to to a signage program, landscaping in the
par':ing lot area as this is a very sensitive corner.
Commissioner Fox encouraged applicant to come back - th as complete a package
as possible that does address signage, architecture on corner, landscaping as
suggested by Commissioner Olszewski.
Commissioner Alnr asked that consideration be given to pedestrian traffic that
is coming north on Bascom.
Applicant aidressed the Commission. Would address all the issues brought up by
the Comir.issioners when he would bring this application back to them.
After listening to applicant, both Commissioners Alne and Olszewski were
concerned that the tenants, and not the applicant would have final say-so on
layout of this proje u . Applicant assured this would not happen but because
the tenants had been at this site for so long and were paying below market
rent, they were a little apprehensive as to what changes would be taking places.
Ali Com,i-stoners remarked that site review would be eery important and
stressed to the applicant to submit a completed package when he was ready to be
heard again.
M/S Fox, Ceyer Motion to continue this Public Hearing to the Planning
Commission meeting of April 0, 1990, carried 6-0-0-1,
with Comauissioner Christ tieing absent.
ITEM NO. 4
STATF REPORT - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 13, 1990
UP 90-03 Public Hearing to consider the application of
S 90-0I Mr. Deke Hunter for approval of a site and architectural
Hunter, D. application and a conditional Use. Permit to allow the
expansion ant remodel of an existing shopping center and the
construction of a new drive-thru restaurant on properties
known as 1650-1800 South Bascom Avenue, in a C-2-S (General
Commercial) Zoning District.
STAFF RHCOMMBRmATI01 following act,.on:
That the Planning Commission take the
1, That the Planning Commission continue the consideration of
fpthis may be
request to its meeting of April 10, 1990, o
that submitted.
APPLICANT'S PROPO6AL
The applicant has submitted a request for approval of a new drive-t ru
restaurant - approximately 5000 sq. ft., and to expand and remodel an
existing shopping center with a 27300 sq. ft. addition. The existing
ast corner of
Avenues
shopping
and naccoimrsodateslocated
112t270the
sq ufte Bascom
of retail use andiao9500dsq. ft
auto service use.
The applicant at this time is re-evaluating this proposal and is requesting
that the Planning Commission continue the consideration of this request so
that an alternative plan proposing a retail addition only can be evaluated.
ggCq�!DATION / SU!lMAHY
Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission continue this item as
requested eu the applicant. A reduced copy of the site plans for this
project is enclosed in the Planning Commission's packet.
r,na
Attacmwnts
1. Reduced copy of si,-
-e Plans.
Submitted by: �I
T m Hal - Planner II
Approved by. Plasecki 1,
Planning Director
f:pcstfrpt/keyprod: staffrpt
p6
03 March 1990
Illy\U R 1
To: Planning Commission/
f
CITY OF CAS!P13ELL
L�
���,...v„„„ �, y�
PLANNING DEPART�IEi:T
From: Jean McDonald �;I!!t 47_
Subject: Notice of Hearing - File No. UP
90-03/S 90-01
As a resident of 318 Kuehnis Drive, Cavpbell, I have the following
concerns regarding the application of Mi. Deke Hunter for approval
of a site and architectural application and a conditional Use
Permit to allow the expansion and remodel of an existing shopping
center and the construction of a new drive-thru restaurant on
properties known as 1650-1800 South Bascom Avenue.
My concerns are as follows:
1. Most adamantly, I am opposed to the removal of the barricade
which blocks traffic from entering Robway Way and which would,
in turn, make Kuehnis Drive and contiguous streets a
thoroughfare for heavy traffic.
2. This is a residential area and I am opposed to an all-ni ht
drive-thru restaurant because of noises from cars, the pu c
and the microphones used in taking food selections in the late
evening and early morning hours.
3. I am opposed to the odors which will permeate the air in our
immediate area, both from fumes from the cars and from
constant cooking in a drive-thru restaurant.
4. I am opposed to early morning and late evening deliveries from
trucks supplying the restaurant.
I am unable to appear at the 3/13/90 Hearing. The reading of or
passing out copies of this letter to others in attendance would be
appreciated.
jm
cc: R.Webster
CITY OF CAMPRE-11
70 NORTN FIRST STREET CAMP®ELL, CALIFORNIA T
950E
(408) 888•p 100
13""menc Planning
March 1, 1990
Dekw Hunter
Hunter Properties
1900 The Alameda N 606
San Jose, CA 95126
R8: Modification to UP 90-02(S 90-01
Dear Mr. Hunter:
This letter should serve as confirmation of the request to mcdif
above -referenced application, pursuant to th99o.e phone conversation with
Hagman on Y tl�a
that you wish to modify
1this It is the Planning Department's Bill
expand modify this application ref lecting a understanding
P the existing shopping center with additional retail uses. Ito t is
and
our understanding that you do not intend to pursue a drive-in
this location at this time, also
restaurant at
It is the Planning Staffs intent to reschedule this item for the Planning
Commission meeting of Apr.? 10, 1990
March 7, 1990, at 3:00 . kn appointment has been scheduled for
proposal1'•m•. The proposed change, in a conceptual nature as discussed, would
require revisions to the traffic report, both from a traffic generation stand
Point as well as a parking analysis. This discussion should also address the
issue of project phasing.
If you should have a problem with this schedule or if You w
proposed modification further, please do not hesitate to contact the P11ann ng
Department at 408 Y wish to discuss the
� ) 866-2140, i
Sincerely,
Tim J. Haley
Planner II
cc: Bill Hagman
The Hagman Group
1990 The Alameda
San Jose, CA 95126
Public Works, Gary Kruger
r
ks
CITY OF CAMPBELL
7 0 N O R T H F I R S T S T R E E T
C A M P B E L L. C A L I F 0 R N IA 95008
( 4 0 8 ) 8 6 6 - 2 1 0 0
FAX a (408) 379-2572
Planr,.ng February 27, 1990
Dapartment.
NOTICE OF HEARING
Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Campbell has
set the time of 7:30 p.m., or shortly thereafter, on Tuesday, March 13, 1990.
in the City Hall Council Chambers, 70 North First Street, Campbell, California,
for Public Hearing to consider the application of Mr. Deke Hunter for approval
of a site and architectural application and a conditional Use Permit to allow
the expansion and remodel of an existing shopping center and the construction
of a new drive-thru restaurant on properties knoern as 1650-1800 South Bascom
Avenue, in a C-2-S (General Commercial) 7oning District. APN-. 288-1.1-1, 2,
3,4,5,56 File No. UP 90-03.
A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this projectin
. Plans, eltions,
legal descriptions, and/or other supporting documentation
is on file in the
Planning Department. 70 North First Street, Campbell, California
Interested persons may appear and be heard at this hearing. Please be advised
that if you challenge the nature of the above project in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues iouwor someoneten else raisence datthivepublitha
hearing described in this Notice, O
City of Campbll Planning Questions maayebe addressedtothe lPlanning on at, roffice atprior �the public hearing.
866-2140
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF CAMPBELL
STEVE PIASECKI
SECRETAR?
PLEASE NOTE: When calling about this Notice, please, refer to
File No. UP 90-03/S 90-01. Address: 1650 South Bascom Avenue.
Mercurp X
jj �^� 750 RIDDER PARK DRIVE
l V I SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95190
IN THE
�ity of ea ridj
CITY OF CAMPBELL
HOME OF HEARN=
_
STATE OF CALIFORNIA _
arm ramiey�� r r"�
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA!aW?.=0
q awftft.
City of Campbell
�rre�rr.r.�iwLa•.
___._._._�_........_.....__._.._......»._......_..._...._..__.__
75 North Central Avenue
f t�reirrrrrrrr ar.
................... .._............. ._......
Campbell, CA 95008
r•. r�r=Peha
..........
NOTICE OF . ___ _ . _ No__...._._...._»._...._....._...
bra " ."ar
rre'r.ar
_. _
iw.srw or�ii •,,..a
&s"
• ut Ivra ywl >ti+q arwt r
�•r�y�a 3�yap�ry��
STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
upe•ie�
a."Ya tr�� Hai rs
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA)
reNwi
�d P"-wr�" Pqwj+4r..
TM 1M•141•e, br10 rM eL( � •,Oe.a W ,•yC MI N Y lens nnWM�,nMber•e
• . M w 1Y•idr.aw w Yw
wl
r•aWppInnrla,re.n wb. tww1Y
i 11re lrM� r aYlYr r �1.•r M r.
01 (� r rrrer a • S •Y
•
►ieWCdr
e• .B•W..e11
r wra..rnera.•
Y w Vddn••WOer•w.r�
wi.•.O
w oare rYwwe d�r
lnp4 Y a . epYIrM.M
aa a•
Wa
nM
�a0ey1 rW af•of a"s Ows. sul. a Crd.. 1w r6nrwo+y
•r�.rrr~irr
���•�kr.
`an
•���•.Ir.�Ir,. ua
M M Ia.1 WrA n•tl1aW • n.•eMP., a . avr eornen a In•� �Mn• Y •e1.Me b/ S.e�v 6e00 w
Ie...�•r r w 6dsnw•tl Cme a w fYl• CYb,a..14
� `� � OY•n Rle Ma V
NI. MR �1
tl Per by We rceela M G�Yr+• b
w urmdws, r bd . wep.pb• ne.• w Y•erOdc. a . ba•.r tlwa+r, h.er • •err .b,
R M
wr L` �. DWYrr ti hM
r�
o.esr•d. W •1 •.I�'i rreded.. W Y M MaN b w MwuM a 0•e b w W.nay..n a
••Y10e� M . •rW.r aer Vrar•.l erw. ae.p, rra a a.nmir.bn d b w •w.n.mrn .M
lrWrM,WMNKWMdr1/I
rr •.r. r.•err•. p.•.•.n• p.bW.e• r w r.e pr tl aM .!w „..H �nY w SI.N��
(�.1 • a r Y rIrbyi••.
�� (iaUrM•prt~d•rW
aa•Wp w 4Y pMe.een a w ro1Y.1•,Mn mMVY/Yewt.ae
rrw.rl•r�r-"Norryd:ed• r•rrrr• M r.y. �yoa..a
ry .�iYMr�rM
L
q."w/ r r q M On1�M Irr�February
28, 1990rraW
.r.r i.
Mr
dr a r•i.. r~ft
*a 2nd MY
e a•rr• ~ •a••r a •.Wr oa w k..@" r
re•.ra a w O.•d W I•YII+ M w i.n roe. uddry. W..
February 27, 1990
planning
NOTICE0
given that the Planning Commission of the City of Campbell has
or shortl;• thereafter, on Tuesday, March 13, 1990.
Notice is hereby B Campbell. California.
set the time of ie30 P•m" 70 North First Street.
in the City Hall Council Chambers, application of Mr. peke Hunter for approval
for Public Hearing to consider the app in center and the construction
of a site and architectural application and a conditional Use permit to allow
ngsho known as 1650-1800 South Bascom
the expansion and remodel of an existing s opp
2.
of a new drive-thru restaurant on properties
Avenue56iFile No.SUP 9p pal Coma,ercial) Zoning District. APN: 288-11-1.
3.4,5, elevations,
A Negative Declaration his been prepared for this project. Plans,
legal descriptions, and/or other supporting Campbdocumell, California.ion is on in the
Planning Department. 70 North First Street, Campbell.
appear and be heard at this hearing. Please be advised
ou may be
Interest.ad persons may PP public
that if you challenge thihpSevissuesthe
vouabove
someonecelse raised at the p
limited to raising only or in written correspondence deliver g,ad co the
hearing described in this Notice, or rior 1o.
City of Campbell Planning Commission at, P
Questions may be add eased to the Planning office at 866-2140.
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF CA14PBELL
STEVE PIASECKI
SECRETARY
PLEASE NOTE: Wh, alinbout
No, VIP 90 03/Sc90101g aAddresscs 11650cSoctleBascomeAvenue.
CITY Of �L�►i�t_`1���-
CAM POE LL. CALI STREET
FORNIA95008
(408)a66.2100
O"nmel: Planning February 20. 1990
NOTICE OF HEARINGS,
ll
Notice is hereby given the: the Planning Commission^ f the City
ty. yaOf C13Pb199Uhas
set the hour of 7:30 p.m., or shortly there.fter. Campbell. California,
in the City Hall Council Chambers, 70 North First Street, P
for public hearing to consider the following proposed projects:
1. Public Hearing to consider the application of Mr. Pat Zabaldo, for
approval of known asr1875tSouthrBascom ate a live-enAvenueLeinaartiNC--2LSnclub.ight
(General
on property AnN: 288-04-22. A
Commercial) Zoning District. File No. UE9Q�I•
Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project.
2. public Hearing to consider the application of Mr. Bruce Bowen, on
behalf of Ainsley Development, for designation of the commercial
builGing located on property known as 365 East Historic Lannn
yserk;and
C-3-S (Central Business) Zoning District,
request for a zone change from C-3-S (Central Business) Zoning
District to C-3-S-H (Central Business with an Historic Overlay) Zoning
Declaration Fhas been ile No. Hprrepared/for 9th0� isproposa179 41-015. A Negative
ation of Mr.
e Hunter, for
9 Public to approve? ofiagsite cand 1Architectural der the cAPplicatian and da Conditional Use
Permit to allow the expansion and remodel of an existing shopping
center L.1d the construction of a new drive -through restaurant on
properties known as 165r ict. South Bascom Avenue,
Commercial) Zoning Dis004ct005F1andle N 0Sbo. UP AONegative Declaration has
288-11-001, 002, 003,
been prepared for this proposal.
ptions, and/or other supporting doumentation
on file in the Planning Office, 70 North First Street, Campbell, cis
Plans, elevations, legal descri
Interested persons may attend this meeting and be heard. Please be advised court, Y may
that if you challenge the nature of any of the above projects ind at the
else raise
be limited to raising o:,ly those issues YnC 1n written correspondence delivered
public hearing described in this notice,
to the City Of cnmay beanning addressed tosion at, or the prior
hearing. Questis
PLANNING COMMISSION, CITY OF CAMPBELL
STEVE PIASECKI, SECRETARY
PUBLISH ONE TIME: CNESY, EXTRA
pRA SECTION, FEBRUARY 21, 1990
I�OSE
0410t
p000C�0
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL Fa R:^ale Number:
Date: Time of Trsnsmission:
Number of Sheets
Including Cover:
Attn:
r �l}Jj}1IC�l
project Name:
pl.oje,t Number:
1(cx
Description of Following Tra"U"Oioa:
t-fioju i tec:a-Trot,
CITY OF CAMPBELL
pLANNIND DEPA:TMENT
Fromv�
cc:O
AM
HAGMAV
FEMARY 9, 1990
BA.SOOK 6 MKILM' RETAIL
89100
PHASE ONE
NEW RESTAURANT' PAD WILDING.
TWORFACING AND STRIPING OF AREA DENOTED BY DASHED LINE ON F4iASE
CNE SITE PLAN.
DOMEMENT' OF APPROXI.ATm 560 LINEAR FEET OF SIDEYAIX WITH IAN0SCAPING AT NORM WEST COMER OF SITE.
PHASE TWO
RBUVATICN OF APPRDXI%ATELY 80,000 SQIARE FEET OF EDaSTING RETAIL
SPACE.
ADDITION OF APPROXII•yIELY 3,500 SQUARE FEET Or RETAIL SPACE AT
NOKTH END OF CENTEQ.
R RWACIM AND STRIPING OF AREA .DE NCITED By DASHED LINE CN PEASE
TWO SITE PLAN.
U44MDOW OF THE REPAINLN6 SIDEWALK WITH LANDSCAPE ALONG THE
NORTH AND WEST PROPERTY LINES.
PHASE THREE
RENOVASPITSACE. OF APPROXIMATELY 56,000 SQUARE FEET OF EXISTING RETAIL
ADDITION OF APPROXI•IIMI 22,000 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL SPACE AT
SOUTH END OF CENTER.
SURFACING AND STRIPING OF PREVIOUSLY UNPAVED AREA AT SOUIHEASf
CCT07ER OF SITE.
RESURFACING AND STRIPING OF AREA DENOTED BY DASHED LINE CY! PHASE
THREE SITE PLAN.
CESaU:PrICN OF PROPOSAL
,his project entails the following modifications of site described
by the enclosed title report.
1. Facade renovation of existing retail center.
2. Additional 5,000 (approx.) s.f. of retail to be added to
north end of canter on Hamilton Avenue.
3. Additional 20,000 (apprcx.) s.f. of retail to be mired to
smith arid of center.
4. Drive-thtmUgh restaurant pad to be added near corner of
tasoom and Hamilton.
5. parking layout to be renovated to conform to City of
Campbell standards and accommodate new omstruuctian .
6. taupe strip and Pedestrian walk to be incorporated into
project perimeter an Has® and Hamilton Avenue.
7. Additional landscaping to be pzwided in parking area.
it is the intent of both the a -ar and the architect to provide a
omtempo4ary, cohesive design which ertanoas the arduitecdued
quality of not only the corner of Haso s Avenue and Hsilton
Avenue, but of the City of Campbell in general.
c jii V
NORTH FIRST STREET
70
CAMPBELL. CAL(ORNIA 95008
(408) 888-2100
Department:
Planning
Deke Hunter. Jr.
;IUNTER PROPERTIES Suite 606
1900 The Aiveeda,
San Jose, CA 95126
50 South Bascum Avenue Hamil[ott Plaza Remodel
RE: UP 90-01/S 90-01 - 1i50 - 17
Dear Mr. Hunter: nt Code of the State of California,
Pursuant to Section at Planning
of the
Covernme our aPPlicatton as
advised that Planning Director has not accepted Y
outlines those itanu; which are
please be
complete. Please note that the attached list .ng
necessary '_o complete the apY ynda until it
An application yfll not be posted on the Planning Commission Ag
complete.
has ueen accepted as te.
uestions regarding this letter or any of the items
If you should have any q ntact the
Planning Department at 966-2140.
listed, please do not hesitate to co
Since���
Tim J. Haley
planner II
[or Steve piap;rector
Planning
cc: Scott Leo
Croup
Hagman
1990 The Alameda
San Jose, CA 95126
'Oft Aft
.,PPLICAPION STILL NEEDS
Photographs of surrounding sites or Properties adjacent to the
development, y En ineer, Gary
A traffic report prepared as required by the Cit g
Kruger. plan.
Mc dif lestons ior additional information on the site V
a, Dimensions of the site plan and property lines•
should be shown. scent to
b Any proposed street dedication buildings ad
ro ect to the centerline of the
C. Site plea should indicate the surrounding
the property and also the p j
street. parcels should also be shown so that a
established between your propose" entries and
d. Driveways on adjacent p
relationship can be
cent developments. delineated on the site
those of adjacent
should be clearly
e• The project p on the plan.
plan. removed should be indica�e�ine should be
The existing trees to be property f, along the rerr p p
g, A proposed wall and buffer q stem should be
system stem or trash management sy
h, The trash enclosure Y the plans.
provided or illustrated on the plans.
Transformer locations should be shown o
4. Elevation: provided
the building should be p
additions re�ate to the existing
a. The rear elevation of
illustrating how the proposed
buildings. osed and existing buildings should be
b. Colors of the pro P
indicated.
S, A Sample Board
les of materials, textures and colors should be
a Accurate .,ami I,,, X 14" format.
provided. Maximwu
6, A re�•iew of parking Provided (a justification for propoosed from
The proposed
ed Lased upon I parking space for each 40
parking standards which should be included 'eC ymployee. The current
restaurant should be calculat Plus one space p
ro osed indicates a parking standard for a sit-down type of
square feet of service area p
standard V P
restaurant.
7, Provide a rendering or perspective of the project. Please contact f e
ers ctive or narticular view of
ro osed remodel.
Planning Department to discusr' Lt�e P F-
the project w'tich would best illustrate the p P has some concerns
to the above items, the Planning Director
some of the design concepts and site layouts as presented. He
In addition articular
regarding be scheduled to discuss these p
has recommended that a meeting
concerns.
•
S z6-0i
i--7 o — IY06
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
pIV IIIOMISNTAL C—CRUST TO M -MO DT K CITT OF CAIFM" IM YAMIMO INITIAL eTVOT
I. SA00KXJMD
NAME OF PROPONENT: �Clt �
ADDRESS OF PROPONENT: I9Oo
TELEPHONE: ( ) --
DATE OF CHECKLIST SUBMITTED:
AGENCY REQUIRING CHECKLIST-('{l—
NAME OF PROPOSAL (IF APPLICABLE):
Lana
II. SWIII@/4010'TAL IMPACT'S
MOM" AM aa;OV1MD OM ATTAO.- eMetT�
fa:IVLAMATIOMa OF ALL XLZ AND M y=
yta YAn4
MO
1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in:
A. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in
/
C
geologic substructures? D
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
D
overcovering of the soil? D
c. Change in topography or ground surface relief
D D
features?
d. The destruction, covering or modification of
any wu que geologic or physical features? D D
c
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of
D
s✓
soils, either on or off the site? D
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of
/
a river or stream or the bed of r_h, ocean
d/
or any bay, inlet or lake? D
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides,
failure, or similar
/
mudslides, ground
D D
d/
hazards?
1 of 6 pages
�M1Ti MYK
NO
?. AIR.
will proposal result in.
a.
Substantial air emissions or deterioration of
o
/
Q
ambient air quality?
b.
The creation of objectionable odors?
a ❑
s(
c.
Alteration of air movement, moisture or tempera-
ture, or any change in climate, either locally
o 0
or regionally?
?. WATER. will the proposal result in:
a.
Changes in evrrerts, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
o
/
N
waters?
o
b.
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
/
✓
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
o o
C.
Alterations to the course or flow of flood
❑
%
u�
waters?
o
d.
Change in the amount of surface water in any
D�
water body?
o o
e.
Discharoe into surface waters, or in any altera-
tion :of surface water quality, in Juding but not
limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or
e'
turbidity?
0 0
f.
Alteration to the direction or rate of flow
❑
0'
of ground waters?
o
g.
Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
,
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
o
d
excavations?
0
h.
Substantial reduction in the amount of water
r
otherwise available for public water supplies?
0 o
i.
Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding or tidal waves?
0. PLANT LIFE. will the proposal result in:
a.
Change in the diversity o.' species or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, microfiora and aquatic
o ❑
/
//
Ilants)?
b.
Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
0 0
[�
or endangered species of plants?
c.
Introduction of new species of plants into an
barrier to the normal replenishment
area, or in a
o D
of existing species?
o
d.
Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
o
2 of 6 pages
•
0 ,Re 1.
5, ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in:
a. change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of animals (birds, land animals
includi.jg rsptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
0
organism,:, insects or microfiuna)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
a
or endangered species of animals?
c. Introduction of new species of animals into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration 0
or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife 0
habitat?
6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in.
0
a. Increases in existing noise levels? 0
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
?. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce new
0
light or glare?
8. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial
alteration of the present or planned land use of an 0
area?
9. NAT[TRAL� Su��ES' A'i 11 the proposal result in:
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural 0
resources?
b. Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable 0
natural resource?
1p. RISK OF UPSET, Does the proposal involve a risk
of an explosion or the release of hatardoiisub
-
stances (includinv, but not limited to,,
pesticides C?,Amicals or radiation) in the event 0
of an accident or upset conditions?
11. popULATION. will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate of the human 0
population of an area?
12. HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing, 0
or create a demand for additional housing?
a d
0
0 Er
a W/
0
a
3 of 6 pages
AM
rss
rwvac ru
will the Proposal
13. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION.
result ine
additional vehicular
0
o
a. Generation of substantial
movement. or
facilities,
❑
o
b. Effects on eristig park�nq
parking?transportation
demand for new
existing
o ❑
c Substantial impact upon
systems? circulation
ions to present patterns of
❑ o d
d• Artmovement of people and/or goods?
❑ P./o
❑
rail or air traffic?
e, Alterations to waterborne,
vehicles,
/
❑ p'
in traffic hazards to motor
❑
f, Increase
or pedestrians?
bicyclists
have an effect
1G PUBLIC:SERVICES• will for the Proposal
new or altered
suareas:
init in a need
.n .any of the following
/
governmental services
o ❑
a, t'i Fire Protection?
d
o ❑ /
b. Police protection?
p�
❑ o
C. Schools?
facilities?
y'
d• parks or other recreational
In
❑
public faci'ities,
e, Maintenance of P
o
roads?
o o
f• Other governmental services?
will the proposal result in:
15. EN.'3RGY,
of fuel or energy?
0
a. Use of substantial amounts
re in demand upon existing
d
Substantial increa
b, or require the development
energy,
❑ ❑
sources a:
of new sources of energy?
will the proposal result in a need
alterations to
❑ C /
❑
16.UTILITIES.
I or substantial
for new systems,
/
S
the following etilities:
❑ ❑
e power or natural ;es?
❑ 6
b, Commu stems?
Communications sy
❑ o
d
c, water?
o ❑
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
❑ o
�•
e, Storm water drainage?
❑ o
f, Solid waste and disposal?
of 6 pagas
•
• vas rwrK wo
17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in:
a. Creation of r.,�y health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? ❑
18. AESTHETICS. Will the pro). ;al result in the
obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the
public, or will the proposal result in the creation
of an aesthetically offensive site open to public
❑ view?
19. RECREATION. will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational
opportunities? ❑
20. ARCHEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL. Will the proposal result
in an alteration of a significant archeological or
historical site, structure, object or building? ❑
21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, Sthstantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self sustaining .levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal commtnity, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant
or animal or eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or prehistcry? ❑
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals? (A short-term impact on
the environment is one which occurs in a rela-
tively brief, definitive period of time while
long-term impacts will endure well into the
future.)
c. Does the project have impacts which are indiv-
idually limited, but cumulatively considerible?
(A project may impact on two or more separate
resources where the impact on each resource
is relatively small, but where the effect of
the total of those impacts on the environment
is significant.) ❑
d. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly? o
❑ C
❑ a%
a .
5 of 6 pages
111. Dlft r'ICa'/ pId111 VmVwm" L".UATICH
r- NV-U wow• P"4`
963AW y
�3)p' �,ros� pry`1uii� l'' f�-Cp�,f1'ic►"r
4�„�.�Yd10 111�'�' �lE lrl(i0Yr0
J
L
IV. Q
Ty[,I IIIAT IDH Ylal fV[MITT C1�tL1fTT�[
wwYf tC�Ml�VfaC w�opM aN6�AM QYI ��MTI`1LCwff[ff1IMT
f[LL
fY TIt CITY have a significant
proposed project COULD NOT TION
p- I find the proposed pr ent, and a NEGATIVE DECrJ1RA
effect on the
will be pre Psred. project could have a
although the Pro there P there will not
on the environment, sliti-
p I find that because the
be & significant
cantff.effect in this case
a significant
an attached sheet have
s described on A NEGATIVE DECIMATION
gation 'neaanre oleo.
been added to the
Pr
WILL BE MAY have a significant effect
proposed project REPORT
p I find envirorment• and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
on the
is required.
f1�IwTvw[
D
ewT[ TITtf
nvw
6 of 6 pages
EESCPJ ICN OF MPOSAL
This project entail
the following modifications of site described.
by the enclosed title report.
I Facade rerKNatien of existing retail center.
2. Additional 5,000 (a^Prox•) s.f. of retail to be added to
north end of center on Hamilton Avenue.
3. Additional 20,000 (aPProx.) s-f- of retail to be added to
south end o: center.
4. Drive -thud restaurant pad to be added near corns of
Basoom and Hamiltc--
5. parking layout to to renovated to oxnform to Ci f of
Campbell :;ta lords and ac=wcdate neon Ox struction.
6. landscape strip and Pedestrian walk to be incorporated into
P1oject per;iroter on Baso= and Hamilton Avenue.
7. Additional landscaping to be Provided - parking area.
It is the intent of both the owner and the architect ato provideal
wry, cohesive design utdch enhances
quality of not only the corner of Bascae Avenue and Hamilton
Avenue, but 0 the City of CmVball in general.
'pMpBFLL, CALIFORNIA EIR-1
...ITIAL STUDY
LETED BY APPLICANT
ENpIRONMENT� IN
F0MATI0N FORM
- TO BE COMP
Date Filed: nuar 4 1990
GENERAL INFORMATION:
ect sponsor:
1 Name and address of developer or Pro j CA 95126
Pr r i 00 Th Alam^da 0606 San Jose
Av nue S n .lose
2. Address of project: er - -56 1(2/3/4/5 contacted
Block and t
address, and teleph
conceone number of Ferson to be
Assessor's
3• Name address,
this project:
to which
number of the permit application for the project
4• Indicate tains: public
this form p ermits and other p
other related Pincluding those required
5. List and deequired fbe Lr thin pr°ject, agencies:
approvalsregional, state and federal a8
by city,
6. Existing zoning district:
pro for which this form is filed):
7• Proposed use of site ( ect �
Same as existing - upgrade
shopping center. �-
(ATTACHED ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
B.
Site size. 538,500 square feet.
y Square foot age. 112,330 existing
10. Number of floors of construction. one
11. Amount of off-street parking provided.
12. Attach Flans.
13. ProP°aed scheduling. 1991 rehao.
1;'A
14. Associated projects.
15. Anticipated incremental development.
199i
Phase 1 - APN 288-11-56
Phase 2 - APN 288-1i-1/2i3/4 19955
1 of 3 Pages
include the number of units, schedule of unit
16. If residential sale prices or rents, and type of household
l
sizes, range , N/A
size expected. neighborhood. city
indicate the type, whether sale and
17 If comvercial, square footage of sales area,
or regionally oriented, q Plan.
loading facilities. See site
estimated employment per shift,
18. If industrial, indicate tYN/A
and loading facilities.
indicate the major function, estimated employ -
estimated occupancy, loading, facilit N/q, and
19. If institutional, ro ect.
vent per shift,
co=dnitl benefits to be derived from the p
40. If the project involves a
variance, conditional use eppliccation
application, state this and indicate clearly Y
is required. Use permit required for drive-throuoh restaurant.
Are the following items app( licable tthe project or its effects"
I uss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as
Disc
necessary).
Yes No s, tidelands,
lakes or hills, or substantial alteration
x 21. Change in existing features of any bays.
beaches,
of ground contours. roads.
X 22 Changge in scenic viewsublior cilandsfoom existing
eral
residential a areas °scale or character of g
X 23. Change in p Improved.
area of project.
ash, smoke, fumes or odors in
X Y4, Significant amounts of solid waste or
litter.
- - 25. Change in dust, round water
vicinity. lake, stream or ground
26 Change in ocean, baYor alteration of existing
quality or quality,
age patterns. in existing noise or vibration
X 27. Substantial change a of 107. or more
levels ifils materials,
led lendthe oron slop hazardou
X 28. SitF disposal of potentially losives.
-T- Y9. Use of flavulables or exp
such as toxic substances,
x 30. Substantial change in demand for municipal se ces
(police, fire, water, sewage. etc.) tion
X 31. Substantially increase fossil fuel etc.)
— — (electricity,
oil, natural gas.
or aeries of projects.
X 32• Relationship to a largerp ;n center.
Phased in improvemef,ts to a large shOPP 9
2 of 3 pages
EtTVIRONMENTAL SETTING ect,
site as it exists sbeforeiability. plants
33. Describe the project ects.
including information on cultural, historical or scenic asp
and animals, and any and the use shots
Describe any existing structhoto ra hsures on eoflthe site. Snap
of the structures. Attach P p
or polaroid photos will be accepted. See below and photo board.
34. Describe the surrounding properties, including information
on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic
aspects. Indicate the type of land use (r8s8lintlhouses,
�rcial,
etc.), intensity of land use .).(onand scale of developmenhoto-
shops, department stores, etc.). etc.). Attach p
(height, frontage, set -back, rear yard'olazoid photos will be
graphs of the vicinity. Snapshots or p
See t low and photo board.
accepted.
GERTIFI TI0N
e and in the
I hereby certify that
statementdata anduinfotmationrnished vrequired for
attached exhibits p ability, and that the
this initial evaluationand to
th tiontpresented are true and correct
facts, statements,
to the best of my knowledge and belief.
J nu r 4 0 gnature
ate
a ti aman roux tnc.
or
r h of the entire site is relatively flat. No historical structures,
The topography
112,000 S.F. present'y exists on the site.
33. A retail center of approxaD Y
nor significant plant or animal life are present. Soil conditions are
stable.
34. To the west across Bascom Avenue: 1 and 2 story commercial (retail and
f office),
the eresidential rcial (retail)
ast: multi -family
To the south: single family residential and 1 story comme
To the north across Hamilton: commercial (office) and historical Ainsley
house.
3 of 3 pages
CITY OF 1650-1800 S. BASCOM S-90-01 5/5
CAMPBELL
U` �rantu ..•Ai,y, A DIVISION Or FOUNDERS TITLE i,.OUP ^ (/
'MAIN OFrICE ALMADEN NORTH VALLEY LOS ALTOS SANTA CL:RA SAFi MILPITAS GILROY
�Am iN Wiw?! M'] Umoen A.e Sk tOo ijI M+ GPIo, SIe EI IPt >, S+n Amon N Sk 1 Im 5A'A1op+ A.e Sk ICPSa,+I-I ,-k,^.e. 4,r^
b+•CABIa SAn bsA CA%IA S+n b4 CA �tD lm Anos C+WG L^'+PAiA CA 95ei� Sa�A4y 1A.1 M M IA+CA-1 `tlt Hrs�P
I--atlm Itl N)-IUA 1tlI T. Imp iA1519+15YR 1tl1}NIDI IIm, Rfl'm 1tlt}AyCPPt
MORGAN HILL PALO ALTO LOS GLTOS SUNNY^,ALE BLOSSOM VALLEY CAMPBELL CUPERTINO
I}A6 Yon4rA, SI 54 t01 JN lYnon Are DS Ne Lm+C••+A.< ID w i1 U^.^o xeA SI, }I] Stl Tmm�Keu d Sh Im 11m So Mxam A.r SM IA 42I Sit-- Gee- — Sit, IM
WHn rM CA 9f6P +ie Alt, CA ROC' Los L+�es CA S!A'L L^nrv+k CA9tl1 S+n bx CA 91In C,— C195m rY.�ii,n0 CA 9YIH
ItlITi1-}kM AIS1771L!10 itli LA ]650 1tl1'B®0 Itl1 RA SLA 1tl�I= A,III 5 5![U
RY REPORT
—
PRELIMINA
11—lFi—tSy SJV4 IA
ESCROW SERVICE IS EEIFHA PROVIDED AS INDICATED
BELOW:
r ALMADEN o NORTH VALLEY OS ALTOS
n SANTA CLARA
o CAMPBELL P LOS GATOS P CUPERTINO
/y
o MORGAN HILL P PALO ALTO Ti SAN JOSE
O SARATOGA
O SUNNYVALE P BLOSSOM VALLEY P MILPITAS O GILROY
ESCROW OFFICER: Sherry Sweeney
Issued for the sole use Of
El GRUBB & ELLIS
°"DF"HO 260456 SL3
225 Airport Parkway,
#150
Lxeow No
San Jose, CA
A"•n
RF iiONTER PROPERTIES
Property addre*ssSS Rod .
Dated aS Of Oct. 3. _Itlb9 —at 7,30 A.M.
In response to the above referenced application for a policy of title insurance,
CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE COMPANY of Santa Clara County
cereby reports that it is prepared toissue, or cause to be Issued, as of the date herrof, a Policy or
Policies of Title Insurance desL.ribing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth,
insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown
of referred to as an Exception below or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules,
Conditions and Stipulations of said policy forms.
The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the -erage of said Policy or Policies are set forrh in
Schedule I and Schedule I (continued) attached. L is of the Policy forms should be read. They ore
available from the office which issued this report.
This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating
the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that lia-
bility be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance,a Rindef or Commitment should
be requested.
The form o' policy of title insurance contemplated by this report is:
AN AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY — 1987 WITH
ALTA ENDORSEMENT FORM 1 COVERAGE (AMENDED 6/871,
LOAN POLICY
The estate or Interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this Report is: a lee
Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in:
CALVIN HAGSTROM, WARREN HAGSTROM, ELLEN MAY KAPELLAS AND BANK
OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, Trustee
under the will of EMIL A. HAGSTROM, deceased, for the benefit
of ESTHER HAGSTROM
State
sit
The land referred co herein is Clarated1Cy ofeCampbell,
of California, County
of (and is described as follows)
'Parcel One:
established by the Deed from Alta Calnia Dairies. Inc. to City of Campbell,
as
4 of ,
Beginning at the intersection of the Southerly line of Hamilton Avenue,ifortheiNorther5y2prolongationlofRecords,
westerlyl
dated November 4, 1961 and recorded
line
Santa Clara County Records,
with of Tract No. 1204Pagehnis Estates
Santa slUnit
ara CNo.
3 .lithe Map thence along said
le n
Book 48 of Maps.
Southerly line of Hamilton Avenue ,3Sra01U50ofW40 feet, anearc tdistance alonghence 62.50
tangent curve to the left, having
feet; thence along the Easterly line of South Bascom Avenue, formerly the San
Jose and Los Gatos Road, as established by said Deed to City of Campbell, South
veyedlbfeetmy Alta re or lessrnia Dairiesthe IncWNorthwesterly tonagstrom'o sPropertiesef the arc1inc.lbydDeedn
dated Jnly 1, 1962 and recorded in Book 5631 of Official Records, Page 619,
County
0fcsald parceleofeland9South conveyedato Hagstrom'sAvenue nPropertiesalong
Inr., N. 89° 40' E. 427 feet, more or less to the Westerly line of said Tract
prolongation, N. 0°
Inc 12N. Kuenni' Estates feet,
No. 3; thence along the Westerly line of said
Tract No. 1204 Kuehnis Estates Unit No. 3 and its Northerly p
02' W. 540 feet more or less to the point °Moubenn,ng, andntiDiablo Baseband9Meridian. of
Se.:tien 25, Townsh;p 7 South Range 1 West,
Excepting therefrom:
All that real property granted to the City of Campbeell; 1202r,iofficial cipal rRecordsr,
by Grant Deed recorded June 12, 19B5 in Book J370,
described as follows:
2
1
Pagceli191ntthe Exnib�tr,ihofsa Grantrof Deedthat recordedain in Bookion of land 8924, Pages`430rtoe432s
inclusive, in the of 'ice of the County Recorder, County of Santa Clara, State of
California, thence South 89° 40' West 3B7.27 feet along the Northerly line of
said Parcel 1, said line being 60 feet Southerly of the centerline of Hamilton
Avenue to the true pant of Degfnning, thence continuing along said line
Southwesterly along a tangent curve concave to the South with a radius of 40 a point
feet through a central angle of 89° 40' an arc distance of 62.60 feet to
along the Westerly lice of said Parcel 1, said line being 60 feet Easterly of
the centerline of Basccm Avenue, thence Southerly along said Westerly line South
24.86 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave to the South with a
curvcradiusentraloangle0off89* 01 anearcrdistancelotalcng 101.72aid feetatoeatpolnteonhthe n a
Northerly 86feet totrue 1ine of saic the Parcel 1,
then
beg South
690 40' West along said Northerly
of
Parcel Two:
Beginning at the point of intersection of the Easterly line of Bascom Avenue, as
said Easterly line was established by Deed from Alta Dairies, Inc., a cor-
ipal
, dated
andarecordedCJanuaryity of C8,cD1962 in Bookc5424 of 0fficialnRecords,Nat Page 117,
Santa Clara County Records, with the Westerly prolongation of tht Northerly line
of Tract No. 258 Western Manor, the Map of which Was filed for record in the
office of the Recorder of the County of Santa Clara, State of California, in
alongsaidMEasterlyPline of Bascom Avenue North 719.44 feet rto the npoint ning tofnce
intersection thereof with the Southerly line of Parcel of land described in the
Deed of Trust executed by Hamilton Plaza Co., a California corporation, as
TrL•tC: to Western Title Guaranty Company Santa Clara County Division, a cor-
poration, as Trustee rod Massachusetts Mutual Lita Insurance Company, a
Massachusetts corporation, as Beneficiary, dated July 13, 1959 and recorded July
31, 1959 in Book 4500 of officia`dRecords,
at Page 28, line No. 89°t401 E.Clara
4Coufeet, more
Records; running thence along
or less, to the point of intersection thereof with the Westerly line of Tract
No. 1204 Kuenhis
of the County ofpSanta of hfiledich was o
Clara, State of r record in
the office oftheCalifornia,
3
1
in Book 48 of Maps, at Page 23, Santa Clara County Records; running thence along
the Westerly line of said Tract No. 1204 Kuehnis Estates Unit No. 3 S. 0° 02, E.
718.94 feet to the Southwest corner of said Tract in the Northerly line of said
Tract No. 258 Western Manor herein rcierred to; running thence along the
Northerly line of said Tract No. 258 Western Manor and the Westerly prolongation
thereof S. 89° 36' W. 427.77 feet to the point of beginning and being a portion
of Section 25, Township 7 South, Range 1, West Mount Diablo Base 8 Meridian.
288-11-001, 002, 003, 004 005 6 056
10-41
JONES/MO/ml
n 280-39-6-4, 66, 67, 68, 69 a 70
NI
4
to the Exceptions and Exclusions in said policy form would be as
At ;he date hereof exceptions to coverage In addition
follows.
A1989-1990, a lien but not yet
) Taxes for the fiscal year
due or payable. Bill No. 28-11-056 Code Area 10-041 (Pcl 1)
$7,4bb•21
First Installment $7,466.21
Second Installment
The above Installments include a property tax exemption
of NONE
Taxes for the fiscal year 19b9-1990, aArea 10-041 (xPcl 2)
lien but not yet
due or payable. Bill No. 288-11-001 Code
$1,372.80
First installment $1,372,130
Second installment
The above installments include a property tax exemption
of NONE
Taxes for the fiscal year 1969-1990, a lien but not yet
due or payable. Bill No. 288-11-003 Code Area 10-041 (xPcl 2)
$4,037.25
First instal'..ment $4,037.25
Second installment
The above Installments include a property tax exemption
of NONE
Taxes for the fiscal year 1y89-1990, a lean but not yet
due or payable. Bill No. 288-11-o04 Code Area 10-041 (xPcl 2)
$4,125.96
First installment $4,125.96
Second installment
The above installments include a property tax exemption
of NONE
Taxes for the fiscal ear 19, a lien but not yet
-005Co
due or payable. Bill No. 288-11-005 Code Area 10-041 (zPcl 2)
y
$4,719•bb
First installment $4,719.86
Second installment
The above installments Include a property tax exemption
of NONE
5
rTG �OAB _� �IIEV rI ��M1I
f year 19b9-1990, a lien b� not yet
Taxes for theB111cNo.y2bb-11-002 Cod
due Or payable. e Area 10-041 (xPcl 2)
$2,930.29
First installment $2,930.29
Second installment exemption
The above Installments include a property tax
of NONE
Taxes for the fiscal year 19-1999, a lien but not yec Cod' Area 10-u41 (xPc
due or payable. Bill No. 2tSd-19b1-002-99 l 2)
$121.04
First installment $121.04
Second Installment tion
The above installments include a property tax exemp
of NONE of
g) Assessment N0. 7 for Dubuc improvementode s tiOU. Balance
Campbell, under L.I.O• #28• County Interest $10,611.04,
of Principal $22,970.15• Balance of Said amount is
fer a total payoff amount. 01 $33,5b1.19-
good until 6-30-90.
FOR INFORMATION PJRPOSES ONLY: Interest is being collected
cl 740.16 Principal and $2,309.72
Coun'fthe Fiscal Year 1989
with the -1990•
ty faxes or
The above 0ssessmdn005ffbut:3isabeing collecte2 lrcel Numbers:dunder Palcel
04,
002, 003,
Number 2k18-11-002. assessed pursuant
supplemental taxes, if any,
Section 75, et •se9. Of the Revenue and
1. The lien of
to the provisions of
Taxation Code of the St.
Cestatedof C hereinand incidents
2• Easement for the purposes
thereto lace,
The right to erect, e of poles all
Purpose remove and use a line of P traces,
necessary and proper crossarms,
anchor, guys and other appliances and
fixtures for use in connection therewith,
and to susPend therefrom , a�tytshallain nd
use such wires as second P for the
from time to time deem necessary
transmission and distribution of electric
on of
energy, together with a rig
along said lines 0f poles.
official
Pacific Gas and E7.ectric Company, a Cnla
Granted corporation Page 55,
official
July 15, 19,4 in Book 2916,
Recorded Records
y portion of Parcels 1 and 2
Affects Easterl
b
for the
p_:poses stated herein and I_ iaents
3• Easement
thereto
The right to erect, inspect, maintain
such
Purpose
and use a single line of poles and
shall from time
wires as seccnd parties
time suspend therefrom and all
to
necessary and property guys anchors,
and other fixtures
crossarms and braces
distributing
for transmitting and
andfor
electric energy
service, tog. th arenderingight of way
and therefrom.
Gas and Electric Company and the
Granted to
Pacific C
Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company,
a California corporation
1956 in Book 4238, Page
Recorded
November 24,
406, Official Records
2
Easterly Portion of Parcels 1 and
Affects
herein and incidents
4. Easement for the
purpose stated
thereto
The right, of laying down, inspecting,
gas
Purpose
maintaining and using for conveying
line, and
an underground main or pipe
and connections,
suitable service pipes
together with the right of Ingress and
egress thereto and therefrom
Electric Company, a
Granted to
Pacific Gas and
California corporation Page 342,
4383>
April 14, 1959 in Book
Recorded
Official Records
Affects
As follows:
Said main or pipe
line shall be located within a strip of
feet crosses ld
ofremisestanduliesniforequadth Of five
side ofta centerllneh
pand
lly on each
to wit:
described as follows:
said
Beginning at a point
in the Southerly boundary line of
W from the Southeast
feet Wes
premises, distant
thereon 7.5
and running thence Northerly,
premises,
corner of said premises,
with the
Easterly boundary line oboundaryline of
the Northerly
parallel
1335 feet, more or
less, to
said premises.
stated herein and Sn ldents
5• Easement for
the purposes
thereto
Installation and maintenance of public
Purpose
utilities and incidentals thereto the
Company and
Granted to
Pacific Gas and £lectria Telephone and Telegraph company
Pacific 306,
August 4, 1969 in Book 8626, Page
Recorded
Official Records
of Parcel 'rwo
A Southwesterly portion
Affects'
6. Recital contained In the Deed from ank of Amto erica
National Trust and SavingsAssociation,
Trun Book 6924ofeefficlaltees
herein, recoec430, as follows:
Records, pag
ehemld title In such proportions as may be
Said Grantees shal
agreed upon among
7. Unrecorded Lease for the term and upon the terms and
conditions contained therein
Dated December 19, 1969 Strom, and
Om
Lessor Calvin Rags
trellWarren
n
Kap asandBank of America
Ellen May
Trustee an Ohio
Goodyear mire & Rubber Company,
Lessee corporation
as disclosed by Lease, Recorded December 30, 1970 in Book
9173, Page 90, Official Records
8, An Easement for the purposes stated herein and incidents
thereto public
Purpose Installation and maintenance of p
utilities and incidentals thereto
Granted to Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a
California c1971riniBOOK 9205, Page 99,
Recorded February
official Records
Affects A portion of said premises
(Affects Southeasterly line of Parcel 2)
Unrecorded Lease foc the term and upon the terms and
conditions contained therein
Disclosed by Short Form of Lease
March 28, 1973
Dated Calvin Hagstrom, Warren Hagstrom, Ellen
Lessor May Kapellas, Bank of AmerlHagstco 6 S.
A,, Trustee U/W of Emil A.
deceased Lessee Consumer Distributing Company, a general
partnership
June 27> 1973 in Book 0444, Page 665,
Recorded Official Records
6
� ..
Trust to sindebtedness of the
1�• A Deed of
secure another amounts payable under
amount stated herein and any
the terms thereof
June 25, 1y73 f Official
Dated ; July 1 Sn Book U476 °
Recorded Records, page 270 Strom, Ellen May
Calvin Hagstrom, Warren Hag Trust
Trustor Kapellas and Bank of America National
and Savings Association, Trustee Under the
Will of Emil. A* Hagstrom, Deceased, for the
benefit of _sller Hagstrom
Continental Auxiliary Company, a California
Trustee corportion Trust and Savings
Bank of America National association
Beneficiary Association, a national banking
$610 000•UO
Amount
as shown on
beneficiarakland,
Sling address of the Ca
ma 1200 Broadway,
The return
the above Deed
of Trust is:
not s
ber is shown.
94612 The loan
numfidents
herein and in
Easement
for ttie purposes stated
11•
thereto
and ma intenance of public
Installation ls hereto,
cldent�ound
Purpose
utilities and d
underground and lectr
and Electric company, a
Granted to
Pacific Gas
California corporation 06ri9, Page 561,
Book
December 17, 1973 in
Recorded
Official Records
2
Portion of Parcel
Affects
the terms and condition,
12• Lease for the term and upon
contained therein,
of Lease
Disclosed by
Short Form Memo
January 25, 1,974 Warren Hagstrom, Ellen
National
rated
; Calvin Nag of America
and Bank Trustee
Lessor
May Kapeilas,
Savings Association,
Trust and
the Will of Emil A. Hagstrom,
Esther
under
deceased, for the benefit of
Hagstrom Is
Stores, Inc., a Californ
Longs Drug s
Lessee
corporation
0770, Page 563,
20 years 21 1974 in Book
Term
Recorded
February
Official Records
9
13• Easement for the purposes stated herein and incldentals
thereto
Purpose Traffic Control equipment and appurtenances
thereto
Granted to The City of Campbell, a municipal corporation
Recorded October 11, 196U in Book F667, Page 6,
Official Records
Affects as follows:
Beginning at the point of intersection of the Easterly lne
of Bascom Avenue, as said Easterly line was established by
deed from Alta Dairies, Inc., a corporation to the City of
Campbell, a municipal corporation, recorded January 8, 1962
in Book 5424 of Santa Clara County Official Records at Page
117, with the Westerly prolongation of :he Northerly line of
Tract 256, Western Manor, recorded in the Office of the
Recorder of the County of Santa Clara in Book b of Maps at
ages 26 an.: 27, thence, North 15°.00 feet along said Easterly
line of Bascom Avenue to the true point of beginning'
thence, North 60.00 feet along said Easterly line; thence,
East 7.00 feet; thence, South 35.00 feet, parallel with said
Easterly line: thence, East 53.00 feet; thence, South 25
feet, parallel with said Easterly line; thence West 60.00
feet to the true point of beginning: Containing an area of
0.040 acre, more or less. (Said matter affects Parcel 2)
14. Possible unrecorded lease as discloed by a Notice of
Nonresponsibility
Tenant Pay IN Pak Stores
Recorded June 21, 1963 in Book N653, Page 15,
Official Records
15. Possible unrecorded lease as discloed by a Notice of
Nonresponsibility
Tenant Bread of Life, a corporation
Recorded June 26, 19b4 in Book I751, Page 480
Official Records and vrious other documents
of record
16. Possible unrecorded lease as discloed by a Notice of
Nonresponsibility
Tenant McDuff's Electronic Appliances Supercenter,
a division
Recorded October 7, 19bb in Book J873, Page 1896
Official Records
17. The effect of that certain Consent to Removal concerning
personal property affixed to the premises
Recorded December 22 1986 in Book J970, Page 275
Official Records
10
18, POssible unrecorded lease as discloed by a N"tice of
Nonresponsibility
Dres Barn Inc.aBook K257, Page 1776
Tenant A�,,dust 12, 1967 in
Recorded Official Records
19• Unrecorded Lease for the term and upon the terms and
conditions contained therein
Disclosed by Memorandum of Lese
July 20, 1988 Warren Hagstrom, Ellen
Dated Calvin Hagstrom, a America National
Lessor May Kapellas and Bank o. Trustee
Trust and Savings AssoclatH3gstrom,
under t`,, w7.11 of Er it A
deceased, for t,e benefit of Esther
Hagstrom s Table, Inc a
Internationo ating'ion
Lessee Oregon corp
00
15 years Page 1227,
Term ppri' 3, 1Q89 in Book 9,
Recorded Official Records
20 p Leasehold Deed of Trust Lo secure undertthB ss of the amount
stated herein and any other am unts payable
terms thereof
Dated June 13, 1988 al
1989 in Book K900 of Offici
Recorder' April 3, 1234
Records, Page 's Table, Inc.
Trustor International King
Trustee Ticor Title Insurance Company
rilsteciary Heller Financial,
$53,000,000.00
Amount of the "Trust
21, The examination by ti:is office of a copy
Agreement" under which the Yestees holy title.
conditions of the Trust
22 The terms, provisions anerein
referred to In the vesting
,.3. Any and all subsisting Leases'
11
NOTE 1: The last recorded Instrument(s) co,veying reuora
title to the premises is/are:
Deed executed by Bankof
America
of HNational
H Trust
and
Savings
Association, Holding
Grantors) to CALVIN HAGSTROM, WARREN HPGSTROM, ELL EN MAY
KAPELL4S AND BANK OF AMERICA 14ATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS
deceased,OforTthetbenefdltof rthe
ESTHER A ,
HAGSTROMGrantee(s)
recorded on May 18, 1970 in Book 6924 of Official Records,
at page 430.
The last conveyances affecting said land recorded within
the :ast two years, prior to the dare of this Report are:
NONE
NOTE 2: any conveyance of the herelndescribed premises by
Grant Deed will require the payment of the $10.00 Survey
to
MonumentPreservatOon Fund fee pursuant
Section 2273 Government Coda
NOTE 3: Please obtain a Statement of Information from
Vestees in order to determine marital status. If married,
the name of the spouse nnust be run to complete this report.
12
1
I
TrT�4
•iiC
�/ .ft,?
AVE. —'-•—r-..._
—'�"—��
—EAST NAMILTON--T
E.-r—' �.E��
R'O�
"+ ?Y}.
s
F
o
------ ---
c, n
----- -----s x
I
q
s• st e; C i t k '� i
--
F
z
- I
w
i,
o b" s
PORT to
It
i*
•
F
g
}, a R t ei a t4 ;
t s a.. �.
t-----
------.
0 T�� yY~RRCLIT-
x Gt t : 3 1S >
t9-Q-� a re
t
Eel 9�0 R
-. R_
.
______
_______t6_ $
I
' PARC r_ L '?-vJ0
-_ ---a-�
--_� F
'a << F q R
R �! =
,ROIWAY-L._w�._AVE.—t:�
e� 1p2.TlV/✓ -
1 QR RGEL Two
^
O I
SCHEDULE 1
CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE—cOCIATION
STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY - 198E
The following matters are epresslev excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss a damage. costs,
a ttaneys' lees or expenses which arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or govemmental regulation (including but not limited to building or zoning laws, Ordinances, er regulations)
resbicting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to tit the occupancy. use, a enjoyment of the land; 0i) the character, dimensions
or Ixalion of any improvement now a hercahe: erected on the land; liii) a separation in ownership or a lunge in the dimensions or
or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or (iv) evtronmenul protection. Or the effect of any violation
of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations. except to the extent that a notice of enloncement thereof or a notice of a
defect. lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records
at Date of Policy.
(li) a defect.. governmental
enecomerancrrnot excluded resulting from a v olalweor allegedlthe eklerel that a violation affecting nthe land has exercise
been recorded in 1' eapublic
records at Date of Policy.
2. Rights of eminent dc—ain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not
excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for
value without knowledge.
7. Defects. liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. but created, tuff -red. assumed a agreed to by the insured
claimant:
(b) not known to the Company. not recorded in the public records at Dale of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and nol
disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the dale the insured claimant became an insured under this
policy
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to he insured claimant
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Dale or Pubcn, or
(e) resulting in loss or damage which would nor have been sustained if he insured claimant had paid value for the insured monsit or
for the estate or mterett insured 61 this poky se of the
ti, or failure of the insured at Date Of Policy, of the
4. unenforcabibl% of the lien of the insured mongage Decau
inability oc failure cl any subsequent owner of the indebtedness. to comply with the applicable doing business laws of the state in which
the land is situated.
S. them suredtmortgage andisbof the lien of tile ased upon sun, or amred consunmte rued credit claim protectionrorftruth in lending lawol the transaction evidenced by
In addition to he Exclusion,, you are nu inured against loss cosh, attorneys' fenand expenses resulting from.
1. TO." or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by file records of any taxing awhorlty that levies taxes or assessments
on real property or by the public records
or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by
Proceedings bh a public agency which man result in taxes
the record, of such agent, or b1 the public records
2 Any facts, rights. interests or claims which are nor shown b1 he public records but v,hich could be ascertained by an inspection of
the land or which ma, be asserted bin persons in posiess+on thereof.
]. Easementsliens or encumbrances, or claim$ thereol, which are not shown Ln the public records.
a. Discrepanctes, conn.cls in boundary lines, shortage in area. encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose.
and which arm ^.et shown by the public records.
S. daimspoent Ik mining o uaims;hebheeS or a^ons or or lilt exceptions
exceted patents under (a) S Iblhoor (c) the 'sshown by thereof;
the (publicwater
records.
A.IERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION
EOWNERONOFAOM COVERAGE
8 - 1970
(AMENDED 10-17.70)
SCHEDULEOF
1. Any I... ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning ordinances) restricting or regulating
or prohibi(ing the occupancy. use or enjol merit of the land, or, regulating the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now
or hereah er erected on the land. or prohibiting a separation re ownerships or a reduction in the dimensions of area of the land, or the
effect of env violation cal an, such law. ordinance or gavernmenta regulabori.
1. Rights ul emmeni domain or govemm 31 reghls of police power unless notice of lit e.ercise of such rights appears in the public
records at Dale of Polr+,
7. Defects. frets. encumbtance,, advent claims , other corners tar uraeJ. suffered assumed or agreed to b1 the insured claimant;
(b) not known to the Lun+panl and nut shown -1 the public re, urJ, but known to the inured claimant either at Dale of Policy or of the
the date such claimant a-quued an estate tar interest insured h, th,, pot ai,d not disclosed in writing tin th insured claimant
to the ComDam prior to the date such insured claimant became an-nsuied hereunder. (c t resulting in no loss or damage to the insured
daimanl. idi aluchmg tit created subsequent to Dale of Polio. tar ref resulting m lo,s or damage which would ndl have been sustained
it he �n,ured claimant hart p+'n `aloe I., the "fair or tnternt insured b, this pohc,.
FTC. tl-.-.t kry 11.1.EE1
•a SCHEDULE 1 (CoasOnued)
AMERICAN LAND TIRE ASSOCIAI:ON LOAN POLICY - 1970
VATH A.L.T.A. ENDORSEMENT FORM 7 COVERAGE
(AMENDED W17-70)
SCHEDULE OF EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy:
1. Any law, ordinance or govemmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning ordinances) restricting or regulating
or prohibiting the occupancy, use or enjoyment of land, or regulating the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or
hereafter erected on the land, or prohibiting a separation in ownership cr a reduction in the dimensions Or area of the land, or the
effect of any violation of any such law, ordinance or gwemmental regulation.
2. Rights of eminent domain or governmental rights of police power unless notice of the exercise of such rights appears in the public
records at Dale of Policy.
3. Defects. liens. encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters (a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant;
(b) not known to the Company and not shown by the public records but known to the incored claimant either at Dal, of Policy cr at
the dale such claimant acquired an estate or interest insured by this policy or acquired the insured mortgage and nct disclosed in
writing by the insured claimant to the Company prior to the date such insured claimant became an Insured hereunder, (c) resulting in
no loss w damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching Or created subsequent to Date Of Policy (except to the extent insurance is
afforded herein as to any statutory lien for labor or material or to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for
street improvements under construction or completed al Date of Policy).
s. Unentorceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of failure of the insured at Dale of Policy or of any subsequent owner
of the indebtedness to comply with applicable "doing business laws" of the state in which the land is situated.
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY - 1987 WITH A.L.T.A. ENDORSEMENT
FORM 1 COVERAGE W27) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the average of this policy and the Company will not pay loss cr damage, costs,
attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of.
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or
regulations) restricting, regulating prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy, use or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character,
dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii) a separation in Ownership or a change in the
dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a pan; or liv) environmental protection, or the effect of
violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations. except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof w a
notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the
public records at Date of P .I,cy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except to the extent that a notice of the exercise therof w a notice of
a defect, lien w encumbruhxc resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public
records at Date of Policy.
2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not
excluding from coverage any taking which has Occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding can the rights of a purchaser
I- value without knowledge.
3. Defects. hens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant;
(b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed
in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the dale the insured claimant became an insured under this policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the ir;umd claimant:
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the
insured mortgage Over any statutory lien for services, labor or material or the extent insurance is afforded herein as to
assessments for street improvements under construction or completed at date of policy); w
(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage.
a. Unenlorceabflity of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the
inability or failure of any subsequent Owner of the indebtedness, to comply with applicable "doing business laws" of the stale in which
the land is situated.
5. Invalidity w unenforce ability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced
by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law.
6. Any stalulory lien for services, labor or materials (or claim of priority of any statutory lien for services, labor w materials
over the lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work related to the land which is contracted for and commenced
subsequent to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in pan by proceeds of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage
which at Date of Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance.
FTG 3157•G 1Rev 11. 1.8111
SCHEDULE 1 (Continued)
'+ AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION
RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY - 1979
EXCLUSIONS
In addition to the exceptions in Schedule B, you are wt insured against toss, costs. aftoro eys' fees and expenses resulting from:
I. Governmental police power. and the existence or violation of any law or government regulation. This includes building and zoning
ordinances and also laws and regulations concerning:
land use
improvements on the land
land division
environmental protection
This exclusion does not limit the zoning coverage described in Items 12 and 13 of Covered Title Risks,
2. The right to take the land by condemning it. unless a notice of taking appears in the public records on the Policy Date.
3. Title Risks: to
that arc created, allowed, or agreed by you
that are known to you. L-I not to us, on the Policy Date - unless they appeared in the public records.
that result in no loss to You
-this does not limit the labor and material lien coverage in Item ! of Covere
that first affect your title after the Policy Dale
Title Risks.
a. Failure to pay value hr your title.
S. Lack of a right:
to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in Item 3 of Schedule A
or
in streets, alleys, or waterways that Irwch your land.
This exclusion does not limit the access coverage in Item 5 of Covered Title Risks.
In addition to the Exclusions. you we not insured again'. loss. costs. attorneys' lees, and expenses resulting from:
1. Any facts, rights, interests or Jaims which are not shown by the Public Records but which could be ascertained by making inquiry
of parties in possession of the land.
2. Any liens or easement-.. it shown by the Public Records. However, this does not limit the affirmative coverage in Item a of covered
Title Risks.
3. Any facts about the land not shown by the Public Records which a correct sum-y wuuld disclose. However, this does not limit t e
aHimralive coverage in Item 12 of Covered Tide Risks.
a. (a) Any water rights or claims a title to wafer in or under the land; (b) unpatented mining claims; (c) reservations or exceptions
in patents or on acts authorizing the issuance thereof.
I II; I1W.11 4K— I I I RN)
(WHY (IF VAMNIELL
A'rM
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION
PLEASE NOTE: STAFF IS REWIRED BY STATE LAW TO NOTIFY APPLICANTS OF THE COMPLETENESS OF THEIR APPLICATIONS.
DiICV-TR6S�FPPLICATIONS WHICH ARE FOUND TO BE COMPLETE CAN 6E POSTED ON A PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA.
PROPERTY LDCATION/ADDRESS: 1650-1750 South Bascom .Avenue APN: 288-11-56 288-11-1,2,3,
DATE FILED: 1/4/90 ZONING: C-1 GENERAL PLAN: C-1 4,b
TYPE OF APPLICATION: )4 Architectural ApprovalUse Permit
_ Planned Development Permit _ _ Zone Change
_ General Plan Amendment Variance
Other
APPLICANT:
NAME: Hunter Properties TELEPHONE: ( 40R ) 249-2600
ADDRESS: 1900 The Alameda, Suite 606
CITY/STATE, San Jose, California ZIP: 95126
PROPERTY OWNER:
NAME: Hagstrom Properties TELEPWMINE ( 415) 254-3076
ADDRESS: 371 Village Square
CITY/STATE: Orinda, California ZIP: 94563
PLEASE ATTACHED SEPARATE SHEET FOR OTHERS THAT YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF STAFF REPORTS S AGENDAS.
AFFIDAV IT!SIGNATURE(S):
The undersigned parsyynW W. having an interest in the above -described property, hereby make this
a uN on n aye Fdance :,wit th t proof stops of the Campbell MunSci pal Codey and, hereby certify
rt the o ( n given Mr n is true and correct to t e bast of /gyCJ ledge and belief.
%
p a a gnature ate roper y r un
OF F I C E J S E O N L Y
PLANNING COMMISSION MTG. DATE:
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
DATE PUBLISHED IN NEWSPAPER.
PROPOSED USE:
FEE PAID:
RECEIPT •.
FILE # Vf V -1
City of Campbell - Planning Department - Steve Piasecki, Planning Director
70 N. First St., Campbell, CA 95008 (408) 866-2140