The URL can be used to link to this page

S 97-20, UP 97-11, Environmental Docs.1999 S. BASCOM AVE. S 97-20/UP 97-11 1 OF 6 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLAN. ENk'I Ro NMENTAL DOCK. 12/99 0 z d lL r d a cc U AAI Gam\ I 1 E C / 0 cr O LL. LL E O cc LLI d J OZ-L6 S pae6aunid ayy Ti-L6 d() aAV woase8 'S 6661 1 �o 4 � U E 9 � 4 U m y T � N C] � 7 � 4 m � � L BARRIE D. COATE and ASSOCIATES Horticultural Consultant% 408-353-1052 I-aa 408-354-3967 :i:t: 4ummit R-d. 1 o. Cat— l A 451111) REGEW17, APR 0 8 1999 CITY OF CAMPEELL PLANNING DEPT. PREPARATION OF A STRUCTURAL URBAN SOIL FOR USE AT THE PRUNEYARD BUILDING I PROJECT Prepared at the Request of Craig Heckman Kenkay Associates 1046 Sansome Street 01321 San Fiancixo, CA 94111 For Gloria Shara, Planner City of Campbell 70 N First Street Campbell, CA 95008 Prepared by. Barrie D Coate April 2, 1999 PREPARATION OF A STRUCTURAL URBAN SOIL FOR USE AT TFiE PRUNEYARD BUILDING t PROJECT Assignment 1 was asked by Gloria Shara to select sites for the use of, and to supervise preparation of and installation of Structwa] Urban Soil at the Pmneyard Office Complex Of the spaces in which trees were to be installed, the only ones which didn't have important underground utilities beneath were the tree planters east of building H 1 in which eight Varwood London Plane trees were to be plar.'ed This section and one planting pit in the parking lot were the compromise sites Kheav Like and I agreed on. as sites appropriate for installation of Urban Soil in large areas of uninterrupted root run Preparation on Site Two long pits of'_4" 28" deep, 10' wide, and, 50' and 80' long were emptied of native soil Preparation of Mix I isited Shelton Transfer Service (Matt Moore) in San Jose where the mix was being prepared I inspected the soil mix ingredients which were assembled, and watched while the ingredients were combined by a large skip loader The proportion of soil between the rocks was obviously inadequate to support root growth when mixed as prescribed in the Come]] Universitv Literature I asked the mixing foreman to add 50"ro more soil to the mix (7 1/2 cubic yards increased to I I cubic yards) and re -mixed This produced a combination of materials which will support root growth while allowing adequate aeration, in my opinion Installation of Structural Soil fhe Urban Tree Soil Mix was installed in 8" deep lifts in the prepared bed A sheepsfoot compactor compressed the mit in the large areas and a small one-man compactor was used at he margins and it. the comers After two lifts of moist mix had been installed, 1 asked the contractor to apply at least I,000 gallons of water, to the 13,000 square foot area The last bft was then installed and compacted Percolation Testing I poured twenty gallons of water into a 10" x 10" hole within a 4-minute period After each 5-gellon application the water disappeared within 15 seconds Between this date an," the tree installation date, the concrete walkway was installed Prepared In Barrie D. Coate April 2. 19" PREPARATION OF A STRUCTURAI, URBAN SOIL FOR USE AT THE PRUNEYARD BUILDING I PROJECT Tree Installation Gachina Landscape company crew installed 24" box Yanvood Sycamgtes in the square planters in the concrete Unfortunately the paving contractor dumped base rock and cement debris to I' deep on top of our planter mix This had to be removed as thoroughly as possible before tree instaPativa In some holes. small amounts of this material could not be separated from the planting mix. Holes were dug (with a pick) in the rock/soil mix and trees were installed with their soil level equivalent to the surrounding pavement surface The trees were then thoroughly watered Irrigation on a frequent basis (2 x week) will be necessary until new roots are produced in the Urban Tree Soil mix (expected by June -July) and weekly during the rest of the summer Installation of Parking Lot Tree One of the parking lot tree sites will be planted on Tuesday April 6 1 expect the same procedures to be followed. Respectfully submitted. Barrie D Coate+N BDC/sh cc Dave Docktor Kheay Loke, San Mateo Prepared by Bame D. Coate Apnl 2. 1999 BARRIE D. COATE and ASSOCIATES Horticultural Consultants 408-353-1052 23535 SYe it Road, Loa Gatos, CA 95010 ASSUMPTION AND lIMUING CONDITIONS 1 Any legal description provided to the appraiser/consultant is assumed to be correct. Any titles and ownerships to any property are assumed to be good and marketable. No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character nor is any opircon rendered as to the quality of any title. 2. It is assumed that any property is not in vioiation of any applicable codes, ordinances, statutes, or other governmental regulations. 3. Care has been taken to obtain all information from reliable sources. All data has been verified insofar as possible; however, the appraiser/consultant can neither guarantee nor be responsible for accuracy of information provided by others. 4. The appraiser/consultant shall not be requi•ed to give testimony or to attend ccurt by reason of this appraisal unless subsequent written arrangements are made, including payment of an additional fee for services. 5. Loss or removal of any part of this report invalidates the entire appraisal/evaluation. 6. Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply right of publication or use for any purpose by any other than the person(s) to whom it is addressed without written consent of this appraiser/consultant. 7. Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report, nor copy thereof,shall be used for any purpose by anyone but the client to whom n is addressed, without the prior written consent of the appraiser/consuhanC nor shall it be conveyed by anyone, including the client, to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales or other media, without the written consent and approval of the author; particularly as to value considerations, identity of the appraiser/consultant or any professional society or institute or to any initialed designation conferred upon the appraiser/consutant as stated in his/her qualifications. 8. This report and the values expressed herein represent the opinion of the appraiser/consultant, and the appraisees/consultant's fee is in no way contingent upon the reporting of a specified value nor upon any finding to be reported. 9. Sketches, diagrams, graphs, photos, etc. in this report, being intended as visual aids, are not necessarily to scare and should not be construed as engineering reports or surveys. 10. This report has been made in conformity with axeptable appraisal/evaluation/diagnoslw reporting techniques and procedures, as recommended by the Inter,!ational Society of Arboriculture. 11 When applying any pesticide, fungicide or herbicide, always follow label instructions. 12. No tree described in this report was climbed, unless otherwise stated. We cannot take responsibility for any defects which could only have been discovered by climbing. A full root collar inspection, consisting of axcavating the soil around the tree to uncover the root collar and major buttress roots, was not performed, unless otherwise stated. We cannot take responsibility for any root defects which could only have been discovered by such an inspection. 107 Installation of I than I Ire MIN at the I'lunecald Sheldon transfer truck dumpute nun the mts on -site 9' Pictures taken and prepured h» Barrie 1) 1trade A i,,, iAo, ni j fin.Iv, J'" &u., I I ,, In.taI Lawn of I Iban I Icc \lip at the III III uJ I •ir i�,.i•. •1 ic"d unl cnntp.i ""I. I' lilt ,uxl .,� ni�a.h•d lia. 0 )4clttnn talon and pncparcd ht Banc 1) 1 7 ,tic --Ir •ry Cam• .'r '1_ • r'f , i REC) M A Y - 51998 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR THE PRUNEYARD CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA RECEIVED APR 1 6 1938 BUILDING DIVISION PREPARED FOR: WII,LUM WILSON ASSOCIATES February ,199E REVISED: March, 199E TABLE OF CONTENTS ECfION PERMrr SECTION PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 14. 1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 1 2.1 Nature of Fill Material and Existing Soil Data S. c. vii. 2 2.2 Construction Site Size, Percentage Impervious, and Runoff Coefficient 5.e. 2 3.0 POTENTIAL SOURCES OF POLLUTANTS IN STORM WATER DISCHARGE 2 3.1 History of Toxic Materiab- at the Construction Site S.c.i. 2 3.2 List of Pollutants Likely to be Present in Storm Water Discharge S.d 2 4.0 CONTROL PRACTICES TO REDUCE POLLUTANTS IN STORM WATER DISCHARGES S 4.1 Construction Storm Water.kfanagement controls S.c.ii.-vi. 5-7 4.2 Erosion and Sedimentation Controls 6. 8 4.3 Post -Construction Storm Water Management 8. 9-10 5.0 NON -STORM WATER MANAGEMENT 7. 10 6.0 WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL 9. 11 7.0 MAINTENANCE, INSPECTION, AND REPAIR 10. 11 DURING CONSTRUCTION 8.0 TRAEVING 15. 11 9.0 LIST OF CONTRACTORS/SUBCONTRACTORS 12. 12 10.0 PREPARER 15. 12 11.0 COPY OF NOI S.f. 13 12.0 SITE MAPS S.a.,S.b. 14 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Pruneyard, an existing shopping and office complex, is proposing to construct an additional office tower and a parking garage. Construction of the project will involve demolishing an existing parking lot and reclocating existing underground utilities, both will require the use of heavy equipment, and handling of a large variety of building materials. Storm water runoff may be affected by project grading, foundation construction, structural work, and building finishing. Storm water may also be affected by post -construction activities related to occupancy of the buildings and human activities at the site. William Wilson & Associates (the managing agent of The Pruneyard), has prepared this Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan in conformance with the California NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges associated with Construction Activity (Construction Permit) for the proposed Project. The Pruneyard, filed a Notice of Intent (NOI) requesting permit coverage for this project in February 1998 This SWTPP incorporates Best Management Practices (BMPs) which are intended to reduce the arrount of pollutants contained in storm water runoff, both during and after construction, from the project These BMPs will address the specific conditions and potential pollutant sources at the site Construction at The Pruneyard site will be done in two phases. Phase 1 will be primarily utility relocation and will start in March 1998 Phase 2 will be the construction of the new parking garage and and office tower and is scheduled to begin in April of 1998 Phase 1 construction is scheduled to last one to two months and Phase 2 is scheduled to last 24 months. This SWPPP will be maintained and updated on site throughout the construction process by the Contractor as required to meet the construction practices beginning on November used on -site Following completion of construction, the SwPPP will become the responsibility of The Pruneyard. Under Section 308(b) of the Clean Water Act, this SWPPP is conside ed a report that shall be available for review to either the Regional Water Board or directly to the requester. Please note that this SA'PPP is organized in a slightly different fashion than the Construction Permit. Please refer to the Table of Contents to identify where each permit section is addressed within this report 20 SITE DESCRIPTION The project site is located west of Highway 17 in the City of Campbel!, Californ a The project site is a roughly rectangular, bounded by Campbell Avenue on the south, Highway 17 on the west, Los Gatos Creek and Private property on the north, and Bascom Avenue on the east At the time of our investigation the site was an existing parking lot C�GTwwS✓ORDJDf`N�Au� D047r' �n! lout' 2.1 NATURE OF FILL MATERL4L AND EXISTING SOIL DATA (Permit Section 5.c.vii.) A soils report prepared in July, 1997 by Treadwell & Rollo describes the nature of these soils. A copy of this report is retained on site. Soil shall be imported to the site. The imported soil shall be clean from all hazardous materials. 2.2 CONSTRUCTION SITE SIZE, PERCENTAGE IMPERVIOUS, AND RUNOFF COEFFICIENT (Permit Section 5.e) The Pruneyard Office and Shopping comples is approximately 27 acres. The construction is limited to approximately 6 5 acres in area. Currently the site is developed. The existing percent impervious is approximately 95% and the runoff coefficient is 0.9 It is estimated that the post -construction percentage of area that is impervious will remain the same at 95% and a coefficient of 0.9, 3.0 POTENTIAL SOURCES OF POL?UTANTS IN STORM WATER DISCHARGES Potential sources of pollutants in storm water discharges from construction of the The Pruneyard Office Tower and Garage to stockpiling of materials on the site and construction activities. 3.1 HISTORY OF TOXIC MATERIALS AT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE (Permit Section 5.e.i.) No toxic materials are kncwn to have been treated, stored, disposed, spilled. or leaked in significant quantities onto the construction site. Toxic materials includes toxic chemicals, listed in the Code of Federal Regulations (40 CFR 372), requiring reporting on EPA Form R, an� no oil or hazardous substances in excess of reportable quantities as specified in 40 CFR 10. 117, and 302. Land use at the site is currently open space. Historically, the land to be constructed on has been a parking lot for the last 25 years, prior to that, it was open field 3.2 LIST OF POLLUTANTS LIKELY TO BE PRESENT IN STORM WATER DISCHARGE (Permu Section 5.d) Table 1 on the nest page lists potential pollutants that may be used during construction Since some of these materials may be used outdoors at the site, there is a potential that some of these materials may be present in storm water discharge in significant quantities The contractor shall identify the products to be present and prepare a list of required additional controls for the materials and attached to this SWPPP The revisions to the SWPPP will be submitted to the City and the State Water Resources Control Board t m�r�wivow�roswrma� Dora. we ix+- Table 2 on the following page lists major source areas and activities for pollutants that have potential to contribute to storm water pollution at the The Pruneyard construction site, associated pollutants, and pollutant controls. The proposed BMPs for each sourcelactivity area described in detail in Section 4.0 of this report. The contractor shall modify or implement cony A measures in this report and on the site as required based on the materials used. C*AT-rvao+otrm.wo oor "- TABLE 1. SWPPp Consu=on Site Pollutant Checklist C—wy Pmdua phemka, fo ldehydes x Adheive Adheive., slue —1, f.muldehyde A.beln. pb—b_ f—ldchyde x GuYu, rl.e., pub'. e.lrot •pnu B.o.me, phmo4, n.phrluleu cow r.ra (nwwM P"ch) Meal. x Clones P.L'be (meat cae.ouc rile) MALL. Cl...mrrmia, lyc eeuuc .ode Anddyblkatinay X BlydrirrS •{� A.diryi611KAI AY Cb mmierr Plumbing Clmaee ..lu S.M.0" w). ft.. (:roc rLlaride) t.tl �P`r. SJeC' 4° c-ppr x Pip. 6" (ad ahavmp) Loc X 6.Ivrmia.d m.Wa(uik lio ) CWPa. Imd x Prunrm{ El.aeiol win{ P.iar rhime,.morc. MEY. mippe VOC. in MW., phew4rs me.al yeiu x P.4 , I..,— v .xlr _6 VOC. T,wp +. Mn Tins Wlv Mr.4 S.ndb4 —pfrm{ x Pies (pipneusl. dye D X Wood. S Pwck ck bond dues (form.ldehy�) Femaldrhyk x X Treakd Woo& fie. a.osae AM". adurKnu X Meavy ad Du.0 (bnck mono) Ma+k X Colad ch.lk. (piOnsnu) x emaek conaere �g OOMwnw x G4wµ —P—" A 'Cac' Cl..ning mrbm p...lummun. x x Fl.oa WA Fluh g Dryvnll purr. x . Wl. Td. m g (mranuc duo) Mn.*.4 Rm:od.lu�{ Adbeive' IrwWim A.b— A)ummmn znc .M demokrim• Venrmg' n— Dun. (bock. —1 u�. dnay.11) Avmndiuomng b_W-9 AA— F.ao x .w be.ung Crolw reevous Yed Op-- Adhesive• Vrd..I..nd m.clun.*y m.uueruna Oi4 ad pe.e, ! dervarive, oils ud gM— and m.inmenc. G.w4- od.. ddruve. dre.l fwl vi'l -&. M-1. Makin{ p.mu (-pm.') Fuvim (e.dirrrms cwu HOD, doud(Tills) x X Grding, erV+swam{ Sodium e. . dirriuo eaW.md. ^ Porubl. mileu Firt hazard control (herbicide) Rodewinda imenir+dn H-M A S.fery W.ab vnen' (herbrada moan., oils and 1p • peuada herbmd- aummu x 1—d wb a Pt—, pwa wmraorc. E—m (.dv ) x w.anbmoving Eavvuim.WW{ Mu y.nd cay.u' BOD Sold—(—Yrub) E.pem{ rraw I— a eUra mor.l d peiu Mdnylakalwry. m.r.b Soil Adi:ne At— -If---if- R.vgc.u.m d Q.dd w Feril— M.mi.b Wane.wng.(ued"IL .elvada.u.) Spr14. W.I. Spi i, W k. vAr.p H.ardeu..uur mnwm+. X Raw r.Wnu1 pile Dina, udirrenu 11 TABLE 2. POLLUTANT SOURCES AI'D PROPOSED CONTROL MEASURES Sauce Area or Activity Potential Pollutants Control Measures CONSTRUCTION PHASE. Acidity/Sediment Washout Pit Concrete Truck Wash Area Const;uttion Materials All pollutants listed in Table 2. Earthen Berms, Secondary Vehicle and Equipment Storage, Oil and grease, coolants, Maintenance Areas sediments Waste Storage Areas All pollutants lined in Table 2. Project Grading Sediment Containment, Impervious Covers Earthen Berms, Drip Pans, Absorbent Materials Earthen Berms, Secondary Containment, Covered Dumpsiers Silt Fences, Straw Bale Dikes, Earth Dikes, Silt Basins, Gravel Construction Entrances, Hydroseeding, Straw and Tack Treatment Small Quantities of Partiallv Used All raw materials Employee Training Materials throughout Site (dunng construction) POST -CONSTRUCTION PHASE. Oil and Grease, Metals, Silt Traps. Painted Storm Drain Inlets Streets Sediment Sidewalks Runoff Volume, Oil t Grease Pervious Concrete when possible 4.0 CONTROL PRACTICES TO REDUCE POLLUTANTS IN STORM WATER DISCHARGES This section of the report describes BMPs necessary to control pollutant sources associated with handling and storage of construction materials and equipment, site grading activities, and, post -construction runoff from newly developed areas. 4.1 CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER MANAGEMENT CONTROLS Construction storm water management controls are essentially good -housekeeping practices that will be used at the The Pruneyard project site for minimizing the contact of storm water with pollutants. The following measures will be implemented at the The Pruneyard construction site 4.1.1 MANAGEMENT PRACTICES EMPLOYED TO MINA- ZE CONTACT OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, AND VEHICLES WITH STORM WATER (Permit Section S.c.ii) The purpose of this section is to provide management practices to minimize the potential contact of construction materials, equipment, and vehicles with storm water as required by the State Water Resources Control Board. 9 C ZATswoRpuosvnnmo ooc ..a:- A. Construction Materials All construction materials shall be stored at a high area within the site, and not adjacent to any low points, swales or grates. Any materials which will contaminate storm water runoff when exposed to rain shall be covered with plastic sheeting during periods of rain. Any liquid materials stored on site shall be stored properly within their containers and not used in exposed areas during periods of rain. Care shall be taken to avoid any spills of any solid materials which will dissolve in water, or liquid materials which will be carried away with storm runoff. Any accidental spills which may occur during construction shall be properly mitigated to the point where contamination of storm water runoff during periods of rain is not possible. Construction Equipment All construction equipment utilized on the site shall be properly maintained. Petroleum distillate fueled and lubricated equipment shall be property maintained to prevent leakage of such materials. Servicing of such equipment shall be performed in such a manner that all petroleum distillate materials do not come into contact with tht ground and shall be disposed of properly offsite. Any soils or other exposed materials accidentally contaminated during equipment failure, servicing, or repair, shall be removed from the site and disposed of properly offsite. If removal of contaminated soils or other materials is not possible due to the presence of rain, a 6" deep trench shall be excavated around the contaminated area and the trench drained in such a manner that storm water will not come in contact with the area, and the entire area will be covered with plastic sheeting during periods of rain. After the rains have ceased, the contaminated material shall be removed and properly disposed of offsite Toxic materials including, but not limited to, paints and solvents, shall be handled with care so as not to contaminate exposed soils or other construction materials Any accidental spills shall be mitigated per the procedure outlined in paragraph A above. Vehicles Vehicles shall be properly maintained to prevent leakage of petroleum distillates, anti -freeze, or other vehicle fluids Any vehicles which are leaking such materials shall be immediately repaired and any contaminated materials protected and removed per the procedure outlined in A. and B above. This applies not only to passenger vehicles, but to construction 6 twwrwwwo�mrwmo rora. equipment such as scrapers, dump trucks or other equipment. Care shall be taken during on -site refueling of such vehicles to prevent spills of fuel. Any accidental spills shall be handled per the procedure outlined in paragraphs A and B above. 4.1.2 CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL LOADING, UNLOADING, AND ACCESS AREAS (Permit Section 5.c.iii.) In accordance with the State Water Resources Control Board Requirements, construction material loading, unloading, and access areas shall be described herein. The material loading, unloading and access area will be in the construction staging yard Any materials which can contaminate storm water runoff are to be protected from rain with plastic sheeting or other means to prevent the materials from coming in contact with storm water runoff. The location for storing said materials shall be on higher ground away from catch basins and/or swales. Similar materials temporarily stored elsewhere on the site to be adjacent to the immediate area of work shall be protected in a similar manner. 4.1.3. EQUIPMENT STORAGE, CLEANING, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS (Permit Section 5.c.v.) The equipment storage, cleaning, and maintenance area shall be located in the construction staging area. The procedures outlined in 4.1.1. above shall be followed for these operations. Any cleaning which will result in petroleum distillates, solvents, or other toxic substances contacting with the ground, shall not be performed on the site. If any materials do contaminate the soil, the procedures in 1.1 above shall be followed. 4.1.4 ON -SITE STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS (Permit Section 5.c.v i.) On -site storage of construction materials shall be performed in accordance with 4.1,1. above No construction materials which can potentially contaminate the site storm water runoff shall be disposed of on the site This includes, but is not limited to, all paints, solvents, and other similar materials Disposal of construction materials shall be performed offsite in accordance with local, state, and federal regulations All waste construction materials which could contaminate storm water runoff shall be removed offsite and properly disposed off. Construction dumpsters or other containers utilized for storing waste materials shall be watertight and covered so wind will not blow debris out of dumpsters and that rain cannon mix with any potential pollutants and mix with storm water runoff. �n•r�wswowaoswrnv� coca, ma loan• 4.2 EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROLS (Permit Section 6.) All areas not tributary to the proposed onsite storm drain system, or areas which will drain to the surrounding streets without being captured by the site storm drain system, shall be either landscaped in accordance with the site landscape plans, or shall be mulched or straw stabilized if disturbed during construction during the rainy season. If areas are disturbed which are in the process of being landscaped or constructed during the rainy season, the downslope limits of the areas shall be bounded with silt fence or hay bale dikes to screen the storm runoff. All storm drain inlets that are in operation during construction or are within the City street adjacent to the construction site that may be affected by the work, shall be protected with hay bale dikes or silt fences per the details included herein. If the inlets are not utilized during the rainy season, they shall be sealed to prevent water from entering them. After each rainfall, the hay bale dikes/silt fences stall be inspected and repaired if necessary. If silt accumulation has occurred which compromises the functioning of the hay bale dikes/silt fences, the silt shall be removed and deposited in a location which will not result in storm water contamination. CONTROL PRACTICES The onsite inlets shall be protected through the use of silt fences or hay bale dikes to screen the storm runoff and remove sediments. If the site areas not tributary to the onsite storm drain system have not been mulched or landscaped or do not have existing vegetation, hay bale dikes or silt fences shall be installed along the downslope sides of the disturbed areas. CONTROL PRACTICES TO PREVENT TRACKING OF SEDDAENT ONTO PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROADS During construction, a minimum length of 50' of 2"-3" coarse aggregate 6" thick, shall be installed from the existing driveway approaches into the site for the width of the traveled way. All site construction traffic shall enter and exit tre site over the coarse aggregate. Dir, or other materials that are deposited on the roadway surface from any other construction operations shah be swept from the roadway surface and properly disposed of promptly at the end of each work day. CONTROL PRACTICES TO REDUCE (WIND EROSION Any site soils or other materials which are disturbed shall be adequately watered during and after construction operations to prevent dust from becoming airborne in accordance with local dust control ordinances c+nnr�wtwowuomrn+ou oocn..�e lour 4.3 POST -CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER MANAGEMENT (Permit Section 8.) After construction is complete and all buildings, parking lots, walkways and landscaping have been installed, the potential for contamination of storm runoff should be minimal. However, certain preventative maintenance practices must be employed by the facility operator to prevent contamination. All wastes of potential toxic materials utilized on the site in the course of normal operation including, but not limited to, cleaning materials, paints, solvents, fertilizers, and other materials, shall be disposed of offsite in accordance with approved hazardous waste cleanup procedures and not be allowed to be exposed to rain. If any spills of such materials occur, they shall be cleaned up and disposed of offsite, through the afforementioned approved cleanup procedures. Any vegetated or landscaped areas which become denuded during the normal course of use or during repair of other facilities shall be repaired or replanted as necessary to prevent erosion of the material The inspection and maintenance of the facility shall be accomplished by maintenance personnel of the The Pruneyard. At least one inspection of the site shall be carried out prior to the beginning of the rainy season and after every rainfall that causes significant runoff at the site. Records of each inspection shall be prepared and kept on site for review by appropriate parties Records will be kept at th• PruneYard management office located at 1999 South Bascom Avenue, Suite 200, Campbell, California 95008 4.3.1 SITE PLANWING CONTROLS Impervious Area Reduction The parking lot count has been se, for this site at the minimum required for the present use. Education Program The prevention of contaminate entering the storm drainage system will depend on the knowledge of the use of the possible contarri.ant. T:te Pruneyard, has stated that a "Pollution Prevention Education Program" will be established at the site to identify the possible contaminant(s) and the proper handling of these materials. This program will commence upon completion of construction and will run regularly as a part of the site maintenance program Trash and Litter Control c �*awaoswnn oocn. I— The property owner shall maintain the site in a titan and orderly fashion. All trash and litter shall be collected immediately and properly disposed of. Pavement Sweeping The owner shall make regular inspections of the site pavement. As a result of these inspections, the site owner shall schedule regular parking lot pavement sweeping. The scheduled sweeping shall include a time prior to the season of the first flush of rain fall. Inlet Maintenance The owner shall also make regular inspections of the site drain inlets. As a result of these inspections, the site owner shall regularly clean the site storm drain inlets. The cieanout shall include, but not be limited to silt, debris and leaves. i andscaoe Fertilizer and Pesticide 4o2lication Controls Landscape maintenance crews shall make regular inspections of the existing irrigation system to identify areas of overwatering and make adjustments as necessary to minimize excess irrigation water from entering the storm system. Fertilizer and pesticides shall be applied in accordance to the manufacturer's recommendations The application shall use only the minimum amounts necessary to meet the site conditions and requirements. Inlet Stenciling Pollution can be prevented from entering the system if the person dumping contaminates can be alerted that the storm system drains to the bay and is not intended for material disposal. This can be done by stenciling the inlets with a note informing a person of the effects of the dumping. (A standard stencil has been used by many local cities) All new (and existing) storm drain inlets located on the site shall be stenciled "No Dumping - Flows to Bav_ " 5.0 NON-STORIM WATER MANAGEMENT (Permit Section 7.) Non -storm water management at the The Pruneyard construction site involves prevention of contamination in runoff associated with water sprayed for dust control and irrigation. Non storm water discharges will be minimal from the project site. Care will be taken when watering for dust control not to use ton much water, thereby causing runoff and erosion. Landscape maintenance crews will inspect new irrigation systems to identify watering problems and adjust as necessary to minimize irrigation runoff Upon completion of installation of the drinking water piping system, all pipes will be flushed with super -chlorinated 10 water. The effluent from this activity will be discharged to the sanitary sewer and not into the storm drain system. 6.0 WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL ((Permit Section 9.) All wastes (including waste oil and other equipment maintenance waste) shall be 'isposed of in compliance with Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and ordinances. Refer to Section 4.1.4 for a complete discussion of waste management at the The Pruneyard construction site. 7.0 MAINTENANCE, INSPECTION, AND REPAIR DURING CONSTRUCTION (Permit Section 10.) While many of the storm water pollution control measures discussed above relate to practices, some are actually structural controls, which, to function properly, require ongoing inspection, maintenance, and repair. Table 4 below outlines procedures to ensure that all graded surfaces and storm water management measures identified within this SWPPP are maintained in good and effective condition and are promptly repaired or restored. TABLE 4. MAINTENANCE, INSPECTION, A\-D REPAIR OF CONTROLS Controls Inspection Frequency Soil stabilization, Monthly and after storms Graded Surfaces Silt Fences Monthly and after storms Straw Bales Weekly and after norms Diversion Berms Monthly and after storms 8 0 TRAI:ND;G ,Permit Section 11.) MaintenancerRepair Measures Regrade and reapply seed, srrav, and tack as Necessary Replace torn sections, remove piled up debris, m-key bottom offence Replace on. bales as necessary. Rcgrade an) eroded areas on berm upstream face, Remove accumulated debris Prior to project startup, all employees and subcontractors will participate in a storm water training workshop The workshop will cover basic storm water information, the requirements of the general permit and the SWPPP. Specifically, the workshop will focus on implementation, inspection and maintenance of storm water controls All new employees and subcontractors will be trained by staff familiar with the above topics before they will be permitted to work on the site. The construction training shall be done by the general contractor. Post development training shall be done by The Pruneyard as outlined in Section 4.3.1. c�T.wrrosaromrn+m oocsr e I 9.0 LIST OF CONTRACTORS/SUBCONTRACTORS (Permit Section 11.) The implementation of this SWPPP will be the responsibility of the General Contractor for the project and project subcontractors who are listed as follows: (to be completed by G.C.) General Contractor: WEBCOR BUILDERS Subcontractor: MJB Construction Subcontractor: Rosinden Electric Subcontractor: Gayle Manufacturing Subcontractor: Pacific Erectors Subcontractor: Walters & Wolf Subcontractor: Douglas Ross Construction 10.0 PREPARER (Permit Section 15.) I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to ensure that qualified personnel prepared the infornation submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for preparing the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations. Position: David Word Pruneyard Associates, LLC f� cu�rwwsrow+oaw+rr�*u nxn..�a �.+r 11.0 COPY OF NOI The following is a copy of the NOI that was filed in February, 1998 to obtain coverage under the State General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit for the The Pruneyard Office and Parking Garage Project. c �wrawa�c+osvr.w�ocoaw r � wr S We or Cafibmio Slne Wow Ra 1— C —N Bove NOTICE OF INTENT TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THE ti I GENERAL PERMIT TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER .. ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (WO Order No. 92-08-Owo 1 auaa: ONtr 1. Orpa.p Caunmen 7.D our 9l orb-¢- ON[ rtcu 2 N- CaTenrobn WDD ■ L It CONSTRUCTION S'TE INFORMATION A.D~fir WILLIAM WILSON 6 ASSOCIATFS IConx Fen<m KHEAY LOKE � AEETeaa2929rCAMPUS DRIVE, T T SUITE 450 1 I I I I Tny VICE PRESIDENT I I T r l l l l l I I I COY SII MATED le Zip A 94403 Tocoy F'frone A �refi1999 SOUTH iASCOM AVENUE, # 20 Y' , wn CAMPBELL �C,01 95008 1 P 408-37I1_470Q — I rVTLOPM=NT G Y Y1! epT4CLC�n LL por: Ol,a rsrger mmrnon p— :l re:, Nme Cl pLan or de•,elopmem of 0—fepaenf v sale! 0 Yea ❑ No I ITrl Fr FRU E ARP (Er;STING P M M D D r v M M D D Y Y� D. Cwuwcran eernmenumenr Dare r g 2 T 7,5 9 8 r E s'rojened conowe+�on compree9n dare F Op 115 T 9? e III. BILLING ADDRESS Send to: Name DAVI jIORy I9 OWNER ❑ DEVELOPER Mai AC6esa rq 1999 SOUTH HASCOM AVENUE, # 200 0 OTHER (Enter Wormoliprf I I I . of rgnrl Gty CAMPBELL StaAn'p T l r l l e t l l r T I I T T I T I T r9�A0� IV. aECETVING WATER INFORMATION A Oaoa ywr mnsvwen aiu1 smrm wales abc/rrBe e: IGrry Mef . 1. ❑ Slorrn ara:r a/abm - Emer arnem !Anent Nme L' I I I I � � I t 1 1 1 1 ly t l l � i}❑ D *" a Asa of U.S. la.p., over, rake. oeek ocean) 1ID Me-c b wale,3 of v5s I. Name ar dovsrno�nq .are. LOS GATOS CREEK TE USE ONLY Resional Board Olflu: - - Dale F.—I usued: TOES Permq N,rmber: Order Number: I Fee Amacnl Reoewee: I Dole NOf Reco—e CA s I ~ 22 90 tsA-: :0 20 C-Dl".1:-7:C1 .. :a FACE 2 V. TYPE CF CONSTRUCTION ( Check all that 21) 1 ) lbusaid ♦ 0 amnsavaipn s. O n,n»atatwn 1,0 Reaidenial 2.3 t:d (ynmercal i Q R f. LJ uo y 11. (3 atir (Plaa= Lit) r r t t r l LL VL MATERIAL HANDLINGIMANAGEMEN7 "At-.li- A Typs at r,,aWn3lS tNt rill be nvidl" ands swrea at O+e sir: (Ch-k an w appyl I.® Sa.enu xL aaeal d.© PetatvT Pmeua •.® Pgmd Pmmcts r.0 Aaphalat:On . f.0 Ftasareura SLessancas 7.M PLAD s.tl w-4 Trtued P-d,,= 99.Q otmt (Pwase Iiso . IL entily PPPO see —fitment Praaiu w,,wW pan—u in swan waver drdu yta: (Check an that apply) t. ❑ QiVNhwr $ePvawr 2.)0 EmsiO Coneoti d. D e C enteYan Comtols a. ❑ve Oma.1 Cesen9e td S. 0DeuntbrVOesmati0n Pond 99.0 Omer (Please 6) V11, SITE INFORMATION ♦ T_:-1 sce et mnururaon site: a. Petsnnt el siw irnpe.vi0us: (IndvQ ; r0an0Ds) 6.5 Aaes Iml— rurnc7a+ 95 % wr .canseuan,,,� 95 �c ✓ lL REGULATORY STATUS__. Is M VK'ot jell b a lolly a Pp ' ftheQmtN OOnavl ►tan ? ® Ves NO It yes. name 0llO=.;fWy CI7Y OF, CANPEELL I candy under penally of law that this dociment and all attac'tmerns were prepared under my direction and supenalOn in accordance wen a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the jnfor 11on ly submitted. Based on my Inquiry Of the person Or persons who manage Itla system. Or lnbse persons dflet. , true. responsible for gatrtenng the information, the inforrhatidn submitted is, td the best of my knowledge and Det accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information. including the possibility or line and imprisonment. In aCCltion, I centry that the provisions of the permit. including the develOPMent and implemematien of a Stone Water Pollulien PreventhJn Plan anC a Monitoring Program plan, will be complied will+. PnrlraO Marne- , � — ) i Tire ✓Pit.?a'l�/ _ ar. TOTAL P.B7 . — .-, 1 2! COaer:- CA':ON r.. 1a PACZ i 12.0 SITE MAPS (Permit Section S.b.viii) Mao Source. Project Phase 1 and 2 Improvement Plans. C�TM SWORVRD * uorwrr— � 9'9s �s. BAsco,� 98006� PROJECT MANUAL D m D PRUNEYARD INN ADDITION & ALTERATION CAMPBELL, CA. DEMOLITION SPECIFICATIONS • JANUARY 3, 1"S PROJECT MANUAL, D m a PRUNEYARD INN ADDITION & ALTERATION CAMPBELL, CA. DEMOLITION SPECIFICATIONS V JANUARY S, 1"8 NORNBERGER + WORSTELL. INC. DEMOLITION PACKAGE PRUNEYARD PLACE CAMPBELL, CA SECTION 00010 TABLE OF CONTENTS ------•---••-------------- ....-- 00010 Table of Contents CONTRACT INFORMATION AND REQUIREMENTS Document 00220 Soil Investigation Data 00700 General Conditions 00800 Supplementary Conditions SPECIFICAT!ONS DIVISION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS Section 01010 Summary of Work 01300 Submittals 01400 Quality Control 01500 Construction Facilities 01700 Contract Closeout DIVISION 2 SITE WORK Section 02060 Building Demolition END OF SECTION JANUARY 5. 1998 00010 - 1 Table of Contents HORNBERGER + NORSTELL. INC. PRUNEYARD PLACE DEMOLITION PACKAGE CAMPBELL. CA DOCUMENT 00220 SOIL INVESTIGATION DATA ------------------------------------------------------- -- PART 1 GENERAL • 01 DESCRIPTION 1 A. A soils investigation report has been Dr�-pared for Project site: 1. Soils Investigation Report: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION Pruneyard Place Campbell, California 2. Soils Engineer: Treadwell 8 Rollo. Environmental and Geotechnical Consultant.,. 3. Treadwell 8 Rollo Project Number: 1858.03 4. Dated: 7 July 1997. B. Soils investigation report may be inspected at Architect's office. C. Copies may be obtained at cost of reproduction and handling upon written request and upon full payment. 1. Address requests to Architect. D. Information was obtained only for Architect's use in design and is not a part of Contract Documents: soils investigation report is available for information only and is not a warranty of subsurface conditions. E. Visit site and review existing conditions. 1. Make additional subsurface investigations as necessary to fully determine site and subsurface conditions. 2. Perform subsurface investigation under time schedules and arrangements approved in advance by Architect and Owner. END OF DOCUMENT JANUARY 5. 1998 00220 - 1 Soil Investigation Dr+a HORNBERGER + WORSTELL, INC. PRUNEYARD PLACE DEMOLITION PACKAGE CAMPBELL, CA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DOCUMENT 00700 GENERAL CONDITIONS ------------------------------------------- --- - 01 GENERAL CONDITIONS A. The General Conditions of the Contract for Construction, AIA Document A201. 1987 Edition, Articles 1 through 14 inclusive, is a part of this contract, and is incorporated herein as fully as if here setforth. 1. A copy of the General Conditions will be made available by the Architect upon request. END OF DOCUMENT JANUARY 5. 1998 00700 - 1 General Conditions MORMBERGER + WORSTELL, INC. PRUNEYARD PLACE DEMOLITION PACKAGE CAMPBELL, CA DOCUMENT 00800 SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS .............................. ------............. -----................... .... 01 REFERENCE TO DIVISION 1 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A. Where provisions of General Conditions relate to Project administration or work -related requirements of the Contract. those paragraphs are expanded in Division 1 - General Requirements of the Specifications. B. General Conditions, Supplementary Conditions and Division 1 - General Requirements contain information necessary for completion of every part of Project. 1. Where items of Work are done under subcontracts. each item shall be subject to these conditions. 02 SUPPLEMENTS A. The following supplements modify, change, delete from or add to General Conditions of the Contract as indicated in Section 00700 - General Conditions. B. Where any part of the General Conditions is modified or deleted by these supplements. unaltered provisions of the modified article. paragraph. subparagraph or clause shall remain in effect. ARTICLE 1: CONTRACT DOCUMENTS Add to 1.1 the following definitions: 1.1.8 Approved The terms approved. directed, selected, required, ordered. designated, accepted. acceptable and satisfactory shall require written action by Architect. ARTICLE 2: OWNER Delete Subparagrrph 2.2.5 in its entirety and substitute the following: 2.2.5 Contractor will be furnished a reasonable number of copies of Drawings and Project Manua -is. along with a reproducible set of Drawings. ARTICLE 5: SUBCONTRACTS Add the following to Paragraph 5.3: 5.3.2 Contractor agrees to bind in writing all subcontracto,s to terms of General and Supplementary Conditions of the Contract for Construction and to terms of entire agreement between Owner and Contractor. JANUARY 5. 1998 00800 - 1 Supplementary Conditions HORNBERGER + WORSTELL. INC. PRUNEYARD PLACE DEMOLITION PACKAGE CAMPBELL, CA ARTICLE 9: PAYMENTS AND COMPLETION Add the following Clauses to 9.3.1: 9.3.1.3 Until final payment. Owner will pay 90% of amount due Contractor on account of progress payments until Project is complete: percentage retained will be paid upon Certification of Final Completion. 9.3.1.4 Retaikied percentages are for sole protection and benefit of Owner, and no other person, firm or corporation shall be entitled to receive any part thereof. ARTICLE 11: INSURANCE AND BONDS Add the following to 11.1.2: 11.1.2.1 Mount of insurance shall be as approved by Owner. When additional insurance is required. Owner reserves right to negotiate difference in cost directly with Contractor's Insurance Carrier. Add the following to 11.1.3: 11.1.3.1 Furnish one copy of each Certificate of Insurance required for each copy of Agreement. 11.1.3.1.1 Form of certificate shall be ACORD Certificate of Insurance 25- S(7/90) with Supplemental Attachment AIA Document G715. 1991 Edition, or an approved similar certificate which specifically sets forth evidence of all coverage required. 11.1.3.1.2 Furnish to Owner copies of any endorsements subsequently issued amending coverage or limits. 11.1.3.2 Upon receipt of any notice of cancellation or alteration. Contractor shall, within five days, procure other policies of insurance similar in all respects to policy or policies about to be canceled or altered. 11.1.3.2.1 If Contractor fails to provide acceptable policies of insurance. Owner may obtain such insurance at cost and expense of Contractor. Add to 11.4 the following bond requirements: 11.4.3 Value: Provide 100 percent Performance Bond and Labor and Material Payment Bond using AIA Document A312, or an approved similar bond. END OF DOCUMENT JANUARY 5, 1998 00800 - 2 Supplementary Conditions PRUNEYARD PLACE HORNBERGER + WORSTELL. INC. CAMPBELL, CA DEMOLITION PACKAGE SECTION 01010 SUMMARY OF WORK ---------------- PART 1 • GENERAL 1.01 SUMMARY A. Project consists of demolition of an existing building for construction Cof an office building ampbell. California, asdindicated inseparate rConage called Documents. Place, in B. Project includes relocation of an existing sprinkler main prior to beginning demolition. removal of an active gas line. and removal and storage of existing laundry equipment. 1.02 REQUIREMENTS INCLUDED A. This section includes administrative provisions. 1. Work sequence. 2. Contractor use of premises. 3. Coordination. 4. Field engineering. 5. Regulatory requirements and reference standards. 6. Project meetings. 1.03 WORK SEQUENCE A. Coordinate construction schedule and operations with Architect. B. Coordinate Work of Project so normal operations of the Pruneyard are uninterrupted. 1.04 CONTRACTOR USE OF PREMISES A. Limit use of premises for Work and allow for work by other contractors. B. Restrict use of Site by Contractor, subcontractors. and employees and vendors involved in performance of Work to specified access routes and construction and staging areas. C. Provide off -site space for employee parking, offices, and material area show Cstoragnot onstructioncStaging Site Plan.wCS1.02, byapable of ftiithin tWebcornBuilders. on the D. Maintain fire truck and emergency vehicle access to Site and adjacent facilities as required by the Santa Clara Fire Department E. Limit weekdaysnandu(l.UOnAMactivities 4:00BPMOSAatturdays9through 5:00 PM during 1. Construction is prohibited Sundays and Holidays. JANUARY 5. 1998 01010 • 1 Summary of Work HORNBERGER + WORSTELL. INC. PRUNEYARD PLACE DEMOLITION PACKAGE CAMPBELL, CA F. Properly muffle all internal combustion engines on -site; limit idling to time equipment is required for actual use, unrecessary idling of engines is not acceptable. G. Locate all noise generating equipment as far as practical from existing residences and buildings. H. During demolition. Contractor shall conform with California Storm Water Best Management Practices Handbook by the Storm Water Quality Task Force, Santa Clara County Water District. I. Trash pick-up and truck deliveries shall not be allowed adjacent to northern boundary prior to 6:00 AM. 1.05 COORDINATION A. Coordinate work to assure efficient and orderly sequence of demolition of elements. B. Notify Owner immediately upon discovery of any materials suspected of being hazardous. C. Contractor shall notify Owner's archaeologist of any potential items of interest and provide archaeologist access to all areas when archaeologist is on -site. D. Coordinate Work of this Contract with work of other contractors hired by Owner and working concurrently in the Pruneyard. E. Establish program for participation of vehicle trip reduction by all construction crews. F. Limit construction traffic speed on unpaved surfaces to 15 mph. 1.06 FIELD ENGINEERING A. Provide field engineering services: establish grades. lines. and levels by use of recognized engineering survey practices. B. Locate and protect control and reference poiirts. 1.07 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AND REFERENCE STANDARDS A. Regulatory Requirements: 1. Architect has contacted governing authorities and reviewed design requirements of local, state and federal agencies for applicability to Project. 2. Contractor shall be responsible for contacting governing authorities directly for necessary information and decisions bearing upon performance of Work. JANUARY 5. 1998 01010 - 2 Summary of Work MORNBERGER + WORSTELL. INC. PRUNEYARD PLACE DEMOLITION PACKAGE CAMPBELL. CA B. Reference Standards: 1. For Products specified by association or trade standards. comply with requirements of referenced standard. except when more rigid requirements are specified or are required by applicable codes. 2. Applicable date of each standard is that in effect as of date on proposal or date on Contract wher? no proposal is available. except when a specific date is specified. 1.08 PROJECT MEETINGS A. Schedule and administer Project meetings throughout progress of Work: 1. Pre -construction meeting. 2. Progress meetings at weekly intervals. 3. Subcontractor coordination meetings. 4. Special meetings. B. Mate physical arrangements for meetings. prepare agenda with copies fcr participants. preside at meetings, record minutes and distribute copies within two days to Architect. participants. and those affected. C. Attendance: Job superintendent, major subcontractors and suppliers: Architect and Owner as appropriate to agenda topics for each meeting. D. Suggested Agenda: Review of Work progress, status of progress schedule and adjustments, pending changes and substitutions. END OF SECTION JANUARY 5. 1998 01010 - 3 Summary of Work HORNBERGER + WORSTELL. INC. PRUNEYARD PLACE DEMOLITION PACKAGE CAMPBELL, CA SECTION 01300 SUBMITTALS PART 1 • GENERAL 1.01 REQUIREMENTS INCLUDED A. This—c-tion describes general procedural requirements for ongoing submittals. 1. Construction progress schedules. 2. Schedule of values. 1.02 RELATED REQUIREMENTS A. Section 01700: Closeout submittals. 1.03 PROCEDURES A. Submittals: Transmit each item under AIA Form G810 or a similar approved form. 1. Identify Project. Contractor, subcontractor. 2. Identify deviations from Contract Documents. 3. Provide space for Contractor and Architect review stamps. 4. Contractor: Review and stamp submittals from subcontractors prior to submitting to Architect. a. Review submittals and indicate where conflicts occur with Contract Documents and with work of other subcontractors. b. Return submittals which vary significantly from Contract Documents for correction and resubmittal prior to submitting to Architect. C. Submittals which vary significantly from Contract Documents, do not meet all requirements specified, and which fail to indicate thorough Contractor review prior to submission to Architect will be returned without review. d. Cursory review and stamping of subcontractor submittal by Contractor shall not be acceptable. e. Do not forward submittals to Architect not required in Contract Documents. l f. Log each submittal mid identify each for easy tracking. JANUARY 5, 1998 01300 - 1 Submittals HORNBERGER + WORSTELL. INC. PRUNEYARD PLACE DEMOLITION PACKAGE CAMPBELL. CA B. Initial Schedules: Submit initial progress schedule and schedule of value in duplicate within 15 working days after award of Contract. 1. After review by Architect revise and resubmit where required. C. Comply with progress schedule for submittals related to Work progress. Coordinate submittal of related items. D. After Architect review of submittal, revise and resubmit as required, identify changes made since previous submittal. E. Distribute copies of reviewed submittals to concerned persons. Instruct recipients to promptly report any inability to comply. 1.04 CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS SCHEDULES A. Submit construction progress schedule identifying first day of each week. 1. Show complete sequence of construction by activ!ty. identifying work of separate stages and logically grouped activities. 2. Show projected percentage of completion for each item of Work as of time of each progress Application for Payment. B. Progress Schedule Format: Horizontal bar chart as approved. 1.05 SCHEDULE OF VALUES A. Submit typed schedule on ALA Form G703 or another approved 8-1/2' by 11' paper: Contractor's standard media -driven printout will be considered on request. B. Format: Table of Contents of this Project Manual, with modifications as approved: identify each line item with numtx r and title of major Specification sections. C. Include in each line item a directly proportional amount of Contractor overhead and profit. END OF SECTION JANUARY 5. 1998 01300 - 2 Submittals HORNBERGER + WORSTELL. INC. PRUNEYARD PLACE DEMOLITION PACKAGE CAMPBELL. CA SECTION 01400 QUALITY CONTROL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 REQUIREMENTS INCLUDED A. This section describes general quality control requirements. 1. General quality control. 2. Regulatory agency inspection. 1.02 RELATED REQUIREMENTS A. Refer to applicable codes and Specifications sections for test requirements. 1.03 QUALITY CONTROL. GENERAL A. Maintain quality control over suppliers. manufacturers. products. services, site conditions. and workmanship. to produce work of specified quality. 1.D4 REGULATORY AGENCY INSPECTION A. Contractor shall establish with all regulatory agencies any inspections required during Work. B. Notify agencies in ample time prior to required inspections. C. Notify agencies in ample time prior completion of Work, and date of completion. END OF SECTION JANUARY 5. 1998 01400 - 1 Quality Control HORNBERGER + WORSTELL. INC. PRUNEYARD PLACE DEMOLITION PACKAGE CAMPBELL. CA SECTION 01500 CONSTRUCTION FACILITIES ..------. -------•---•...................................................... PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 REQUIREMENTS INCLUDED A. This section describes temporary construction facilities and temporary controls required during demolition. 1. Electricity and lighting. 2. Water and sanitary facilities. 3. Construction aids. 4. Barriers. 5. Cleaning during iemolition. 6. Field offices. telephone service. and storage. B. Contact governing authorities to establish extent of temporary facilities and temporary controls required by authorities. C. Provide temporary construction facilities and temporary controls as required tr- conform with applicable authorities and as required to complete Project in accordance with Contract Documents. D. Provide t.nnporary construction facilities within construction areas shown on Construction Staging Site Plan. CS1.02. by Y, Builders. or off -site. 1.02 ELELfRICITY AND LIGHTING A. Provide electrical service required for demolition operations, with branch wiring and distribution boxes located to allow service and lighting by means of construction -type power cords. -s. Provide lighting for demolition operations. 1.03 WATER AND SANITARY FACILITIES A. Provide water service required for demolition operations: extend t,inch piping with outlets located so water is available by use of hoses. B. Provide and maintain sanitary facilities and enclosures as required by applicable authorities. 1.04 CONSTRUCTION AIDS A. Dewatering: Provide and operate drainage and pumping equipment; maintain site free of standing water. 1-40 JANUARY 5. 1998 01500 - 1 Construction Facilities HORNBERGER + WORSTELL. INC. PRUNEYARD PLACE DEMOLITION PACKAGE CAMPBELL, CA B. Noise and Pollution Control: Provide materials and equipment necessary to comply with local requirements for noise and pollution control. 1. Comply with any special noise abatement requirements relating to Aloha Apartments as directed by Owner. C. Fire Protection: Maintain on -site fire protection facilities as required by applicable authorities and insurance requirements. 1.05 BARRIERS A. Provide barriers as required to prevent public entry to demolition areas and to protect adjacent properties from damage from demolition operations. 1. Fence: Coordinate with contractor for building construction; provide fencing as r*cessary where building construction fencing is not yet available. B. Provide barricades as required by governing authorities. C. Provide barriers around trees and plants designated to remain; protect against vehicular traffic, stored materials, dumping, chemically injurious materials, and puddling or continuous running water. 1. Contractor shall protect all existing trees not identified for removal. 2. Contractor shall coordinate efforts with proposals of Owner's arborist. 3. Replace all damaged trees with three trees for every tree removed: replacement trees to be 24" box of identical type of tree unless othe rise directed by Owner's arborist. 1.06 CLEANING DURING DEMOLITION A. Control accumulation of waste materials and rubbish: dispose of off - site at intervals roved by Architect. 1.07 TELEPHONE SERVICE AND STORAGE A. Telephone Service: Provide cellular telephone service to field operations on -site Project Manager. B. Storage for Tools. Materials. and Equipment: Limit on -site storage to Project area. C. Signs: Subject to approval of Architect and Owner. JANUARY 5. 1998 01500 - 2 Construction Facilities HORNBFRGER + WORSTELL. INC. PRUNEYARD PLACE DEMOLITION PACKAGE CAMPBELL. CA 1.08 REMOVAL A. Remove temporary materials, equipment, services. and construction prior to Substantial Completion Inspection. B. Clean and repair damage caused by installation or use of temporary facilities. END OF SECTION JANUARY 5, 1998 01500 • 3 Construction Facilities HORNBERGER + WORSTELL. INC. PRUAMPBE PLACE C DEMOLITION PACKAGE AMPBELL. CA .... SECTION 01700 CONTRACT CLOSEOUT ------------------------------------------------------ PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 REQUIREMENTS INCLUDED A. This section describes Contract closeout procedures. 1. Final completion. 2. Project record documents. 1.02 RELATED REQUIREMENTS A. Section 01500: Cleaning during construction. 1.03 FINAL COMPLETION A. When Work is complete. submit written certification indicating: 1. Work has been inspected for compliance with Contract Documents. 2. Work has been completed in accordance with Contract Documents. 3. Work is complete and ready for final inspection. B. Special Sjbmittals: In addition to submittals required by Contract. submit following. 1. Provide submittals required by governing authorities. 2. Submit final statement of accound sumremainivindueotal adjusted Contract Sum. previous paymen. 1.04 PROJECT RECORD DOCUMENTS A. Keep documents current. 1, Owner Drawingslto mainiainofora Project LRecord h a pDocte set of reproducible Documents. 2. Store reproducible Drawings. one set of Project Manual. and one copy of each Change Order separate from documents used for demolition. for use as Project Record Documents. 3. Indicate actual work on Drawings where differing from work indicated; indicate location of site utilities discovered during demolition and relocation of existing utilities. JANUARY 5. 1998 017OO - 1 Contract Closeout HORKBERGER + V*RSTELL. INC. PRUNEYARD PLACE DEMOLITION PACKAGE CAMPBELL. CA B. At Contract closeout submit documents with transmittal letter containing date. Project title, Contractor's name and address. list of documents, and signature of Contractor. END OF SECTION Yiil!l.RY 5. 1998 01700 - 2 Contract Closeout NORNBERGER + WORSTELL. INC. PRUNEYARD PLACE DEMOLITION PACKAGE CAMPBELL, CA SECTION 02060 BUILDING DEMOLITION PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 WORK INCLUDED A. Demolish existing two story structure as required for completion of Pruneyard Place Office Building and Garage as indicated in Contract Documents. 1. Remove existing materials and equipment from site. 2. Remove foundations including basement floor slabs. 3. Cap and identify active utilities. B. Remove inactive service lines. C. Relocate existing sprinkler main prior to beginning demolition. D. Remove existing active gas line and cap and identify location of cap. E. Remove and store existing laundry equipment. 1.02 RELATED WORK A. Section 01500: Temporary barriers- B. Municipal Authorities: Dismantling, or removing, and capping of Municipal utilities. 1.03 SUBMITTALS A. Submit the following in accordance with Section 01300. 1. Permits and notices authorizing demolition work. 2. Certificates of severance of utility services. 3. Permit for transport and disposal of debris. 4. Demolition Procedures and operational sequeice for review and acceptance gy Architect. 1.04 PROTECTION A. Do not interfere with use of adjacent buildings: maintain free and safe passage to and from. JANUARY 5, 1998 02060 - 1 Building Demolition HORNBERGER + WORSTELL, INC. PRUNEYARD PLACE DEMOLITION PACKAGE CAMPBELL. CA B. Prevent movement or settlement of adjacent structures, provide and ^ place bracing or shoring and be responsible for safety and support of structures. 1. Assume liability for movement, settlement. damage or injury. C. Cease operations and notify Architect immediately if safety of adjacent structures appears to be endangered: take precautions to properly support structures. 1. Do not resume operations until safety is restored. D. Prevent movement. settlement or collapse of adjacent services, sidewalks. driveways and trees. 1. Assume liability for such movement. settlement or collapse, promptly repair. 1.05 EXISTING SERVICES A. Arrange and pay for disconnecting or removing, capping and plugging utility services: disconnect and stub off; notify affected utility company in advance and obtain approval before starting Work. B. Place markers to indicate location of disconnected services; identify service lines and capping locations on Project Record Documents. 1.06 MAINTAINING TRAFFIC A. Do rat close or obstruct roadways without permits. B. Conduct operations with minimum interference to adjacent traffic. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 MATERIALS A. Unless otherwise noted. maintain possession of materials being demolished: immediately remove from site. B. Carefully remove. store and reinstall existing sprinkler main. 1. Provide new materials as required to complete relocation and reinstallation of existing sprinkler main. 2. New materials to match original materials in type and quality. C. Carefully remove existing laundry equipment to be retained by Owner; deliver and store within Pruneyard area where directed. ,ow JANUARY 5, 1998 02060 • 2 Building Demolition HORNBERGER + WORSTELL. INC. PRUNEYARD PLACE DEMOLITION PACKAGE CAMPBELL, CA PART 3 EXECUTION 3.01 DEMOLITION A. Demolish structures and aFpurtenances in an orderly and careful manner. B. Perform demolition in acco•dance with authorities having jurisdiction. 1. Do not use explosives. C. Keep work sprinkled to prevent dust: provide hoses and watermain or hydrant connections as required for demolition. D. Remove demolished materials from site, except Where otherwise indicated and unless otherwise directed by Architect. 1. Burning of materials on site is not permitted. 2. Remove from site. contaminated, vermin infested, or dangerous materials encountered and dispose of by safe means so as not to endanger health of workers or public. E. Rough grade areas affected by demolition and leave level to within one percent: maintain grades and contours of site as indicated. 1. Backfill overexcavated areas. open pits and holes caused as a result of demolition which exceed excavation limits for project: use approved fill. F. Remove demolished materials, tools and equipment upon completion of work; leave site in condition acceptable to Architect. G. Reinstall existing sprinkler main to location indicated; comply with applicable codes and regulations: reinstallation to provide complete operational installation acceptable to applicable authorities. 3.02 REPAIR A. Repair damage to adjacent structures caused as result of demolition. B. Repair demolition beyond that required for Project. END OF SECTION JANUARY 5. 1998 02060 - 3 Building Demolition CITY OF CAMPBELL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS EXPANDED INITIAL STUDY FOR PRUNEYARD PLACE September 1"7 CITY OFCAMPBELL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT EXPANDED INITIAL STUDY FOR PRUNEYARD PLACE - -REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS — The City of Campbell is situated in the south bay metropolitan area of the San Francisco Bay Region, with a population of 38.000 residents in a six square mile area. Campbell is serviced by Highways 17 and 85, San Tomas Expressway and major arterial streets, such as Hamilton Avenue and Bascom Avenue. The City has a mixture of land uses including residential, commercial and industrial developments and is primarily built out with minimal opportunity for comprehensive large scale development. As a result, the City is seeing an increase in development proposals for expansion and redevelopment of existing properties. PROJECT BACKGROUND The Pruneyard is a mixed -use property situated on 272 net acres located at the southwest comer of Bascom Avenile and Campbell Avenue. Developmem on the property consists of one 18 story high-rise iffice building with 116.743 square feet (Tower 1) and one ten story high-rise office builo-E, of approximately 117,476 square feet (Tower 11). Both towers are located at the wester t half of the property. The eastem portion of (he property is developed with an approximi -ly 248,(M square foot shopping center that fronts onto Bascom Avenue and a portion d Campbell Avenue. The property was originally developed in the early 1970's and a major remodel of the shopping center was completed in 1996 and included two single user pad buildings (Bank of America and Outback Steakhouse). The northwestern end of the property provides a connection to the Los Gatos Creek Trail and the 182 unit Aloha Apartment complex is adjacent to the northern property line. Properties to the east and south arc developed with commercial land uses. The western side of the property is bounded by Highway 17. PROPOSAL INFORMATION The City of Campbell Community Development Department has received a development application from William Wilson Associates, owners of the Pruneyard, to construct a 120,000 square foot, 6 story office buildirg to the west of and between the two existing office towers, a 4 level parking garage structure at the northwest corner of the property, and a 54 room hotel expansion 018 existing rooms). The City is requesting proposals from qualified planning consult�ats to prepare an expanded initial study and recommended mitigation measures, in conjunction with the "Pruneyard Place" development application. SCOPE OF SERVICES The requested expanded initial study for the Pruneyard Place development shall comply with all requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Major tasks to be performed for the environmental assessment shoadd include an analysis that emphasizes the following issues: Noise • Existing and fuiure noise levels during peak hours with particular emphasis on noise impacts along northern driveway and to the adjacent apartments. • Noise impacts related to the various phases of construction on the adjacent apartments and to the tenants and patrons at the shopping center and the hotel. • Analysis of single event noise impacts including truck deliveries, trash collection, patrons, late evening uses (10 p.m. to 2 a.m.i, vehicles entering and exiting the northern driveway and vehicles noise generated from use of the parking structure on ambient noise levels. • Potential noise impacts with the extension of Campisi Way into the Pruneyard. Parkin • Existing and proposed on -site parking. • Impacts of temporary off -site parking arrangements during the construction phase of the project on parking demands of the office and shopping center. _Traffic Generation • The impacts of additional traffic levels on Bascom. Hamilton, and Campbell Avenues, and on the intersections of Bascom/Hamilton and Camphell/Bascom and Campbell/Union Avenue. • The traffic impacts before and after construction of the Vasona Light Rail extension. • Future traffic impacts with the extension of Campist Way into the Pruneyard. Circulation • Impacts of traffic increases to on -site traffic and pedestrian :-irculation. • Impacts pedestrian and traffic circulation during construction phases of the project. • Impacts of construction on the pedestrian connection to the Los Gatos Creek Trail from the Pruneyard. Air Quality Determination It s not anticipated that the traffic generated from the project will result in adverse air quality impacts. The consultant will be asked to verify that the project will not have 1999 S. BASCOM AVE. S 97-20/UP 97-11 2 OF 6 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLAN. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCS. l21/99 a significant impact, based on stanuards established by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). 1. Expanded Initial Study - Environmental Review The expanded initial study shall include the following elements: 1. Description of the Project including but not limited to project overview, objectives, consistency with plans. goals, and policies, etc. 2. Description of the Environmental Setting including but not limited to land use, traffic and circulation, air quality, noise etc. ?. The Envire .mental Checklist form with appropriate references for each response. 4. Discussion of environmental impacts. 5. A determination of significance. 6. Preparation of appropriate environmental documentation including identification of mitigation measures. as necessary. REQUIRED SERVICES AND PRODUCT The consultant is responsible for the preparation of legally adequate, defensible and internally consistent environmental assessment of the proposed project consistent with all State Laws, and shall address all items contained in the abcve Scope of Services section. The expanded initial study shall be written in a clear and concise manner which can be easily understood by the general public. The report shall be illustrated with charts, maps, graphs and photographs to clarify and summarize the information. All photographic information should be scanned images and/or digital images. The consultant is responsible for submitting ten (10) bound copies, one (1) unbound copy and one photocopy -ready version of the completed document. Final dos meats shall be submitted on a floppy diskette in addition to hard copies The City will be responsible for printing all additional copies as needed. MEETINGS The selected consultant may be required to attend, make presentations and answer questions at an agreed upon number of meetings relating to the technica! analysis and conclusions for the expanded initial study. Staff anticipates that the consultant may he involved in a total of 5-6 following meetings: • Meetings with City of Campbell staff and the Pruneyard property owners (1-2). • Planning Commission Meetings (1-2) • City Council Meetings (1-2) BACKGROUND MATERIALS The City will provide respondents with supposing documentation required for the project. These materials may include but are not limited to: I. A copy of the current City of Campbell General Plan. 2. Noise Study completed by Paoletti Associates, Inc. dated July 21. 1997 for the Pruneyard Place project (Expanded analysis to follow). 3. Traffic Study of the Pruneyard Place prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan Engineers dated August 21, 1997. A revised traffic study will be submitted vithin 2- 3 weeks from the date of this proposal. SELECTION CRITERIA The following criteria are among those that will be used to evaluate the submitted proposals: I. Ability to complete the project within three (3) weeks from the date that the consultant is selected. 2. The cost of the environmental assessment and costs for attending the required meetings. 3. Demonstration of work histery with particular emphasis on the preparation of environmental analysis. kesponses to the RFP are due to Gloria S iara Protect Planner Citv of Campbell Community Development Department, 70 North First Street CampmlL CA 95008 by 5.00 p.m., Monday September 221997 RFPs may be faxed to (408) 866-8381. If you have any questions regarding this Regaest for Proposals, please contact Gloria Sciara, Project Planner, at (408) 866-2140 or (408) 866-2143 (direct line). This Request for Proposals is not a contract or a uimmrtment os any kind by the City of Campbell and does not commit the City to a,a,, , contract m any Parry or a, par asp rolls incunrd in the submission of a proposal. All Prol—ols w111 hecomr the property f the City I Campbell. f P1 G I N L L R S ENGINEERS C PEANNtRS • TRArrlc. TRANS"IATVN, PARKING 214 6w fnM,•ad, xlve, S,alr 400 • Pi,adena, [aldomia 91101 --� 14— 626 71N, 2122 • Ia• 672, 192.o941 August 21, 1997 5 Mr. David R. Word Prune Yard Associales, LLC 1999 South Bascom Avenue, Suite 200 Campbell, California 95009 Subject: Prune Yard Place Traffic Access, Circulation and Pa. king Campbell, California Dear Mr. Word: Linscon, I.aw & Greenspan, Engineers, is pleased to submit this Letter Report addressing the traffic access. circulation and parking aspects of the third Prune Yard Place office tower and the expansion of the Prune Yard Inn. As we Understand it, the third office tower will be 130,000 gross square feet (GSF) and will contain a total of 120,000 net square feet (NSF) The new office tower will be located between the existing office buildings and situated adjacent to the Routel7 Freeway. The Prune Yard Inn expansion will have 54 rooms. Parking to meet anticipated need will be provided by the construction of a new parking structure in the northwest comer of the Prune Yard site. The existing Prune Yard is a mixed use development consisting of a 251, 120 SF shopping center (including restaurant and theater use), a 117 room inn, and two office towers totaling 234,000 NSF. According to management, ',he two office towers are effectively 100 percent occupied and the shopping center better than 90 percent occupied. The easterly two-thirds of the site contains the shopping center and inn, and the westerly third the office towers. A landscaped two -bay parking area, with a one-way counterclockwise circulation roadway and traffic circle, separates the office use from the shopping center. All existing parking is in surface parking lots with shared parking in the evening and on weekends. W�I:iwnA far. I', I ,n•a M,•.., 714 h41 1 ,M' • \.,n 11 ,1;�' 1.1'l 2'1'1 """ • i a• V,JyN 7a2 4$1.111!11 • Are l l.!11'll (,•,ql,,,•l n c I i i x s Mr. David It. Word August 21, 1997 Page Two Existing Driveway Access The Prune Yard occupies the northwest quadrant of the South Bascom Avenue and Campbell Avenue intersection. On South Bascom there are presently three driveways; a full access signalized driveway at the northeast corner of the site, and two right -turn in/right-turn out only driveways. There are also three Prune Yard driveways on Campbell Avenue; a full access signalized driveway at Union Avenue (near the southwest comer of the site), a right -turn in/ left -turn in one-way only entry driveway, and a full access unsignalized driveway. Existing Driveway Traffic Volumes Figures I and 2 , at the rear of this letter report, present existing Friday and Saturday PM peak hour driveway traffic volumes at the Prune Yard. l hesc figures are based on traffic counts conducted on Friday, July 11, 1997 (4:00-6:00 PM) and on Saturday, July 12, 1997 (1:00-4:00 PM). Entering and exiting tuming movements are shown. Also shown is the percent of total entry -exit traffic at each driveway. Figure 1 (Friday) includes office commute traffic, and it can be seen that a total of 2,335 vehicles entered (1,202 vehicles) and exited (1133 vehicles) the Prune Yard, with 33.5 percent via the South Bascom signal and 19.8 percent via the Campbell/Union signal. Further examination of Figure 1 >Jso shows that more traffic (21.1 percent) used the unsignalized driveway on Campbell than Campbell/Union. Also of note is the volume of Prune Yard traffic on Union Avenue (6.2 Percent). Figure 2 (Saturday) includes only a few office vehicle trips and is essentially the same as Figure 1. A total of 2,108 vehicles were observed entering and exiting the Prune Yard (1,040 entering, 1068 exiting). The signalized driveway on South Bascom and the unsignalized full access driveway on Campbell are shown to carry about the same percent of total traffic as on Friday. With the office use at low ebb (no commute peak), the percent of traffic using the Campbell/Union driveway is lower than on Friday. Signalized Bascom Driveway - Internal Intersection 'I he proposed new parking Structure will have direct access to the existing two-lane property line roadway along the north edge of the Prune Yard This roadway connects to the existing traffic signal on South Bascom Avenue. Immediately to the west of Bascom (and adjacent to the Out of Albuquerque Restaurant) is an internal intersection which provides access to the parking area along South Bascom and to a one-way westbound parking aisle (away from the intersection) on the north side of the Out of Albuquerque Restaurant (which connects to the Prune Yard Inn parking). 'Phis internal intersection has been identified as a potential problem. n C. I i c s Mr David R. Word August 21, 1997 Page Three Figures 3 and 4 present the existing Friday PM peak commute hour, and Saturday PM peak hour traffic flow at this internal intersection. The property line roadway presently contains one lane in each direction, plus parallel parking on the south (eastbound) side Traffic entering from Bascom has a wide. westbound through lane and a separate left -torn lane. Dual left -turn lanes and a right -turn only lane are provided for exiting traffic. To improve existing operation, and provide for future project generated traffic, the below changes are suggested. Eliminate the parallel parking adjacent to the intersection, and restripe to provide two eastbound lanes (one left-tum only lane, one left -right optio.i lane). Remove the first four parking spaces on the north -south aisle in front of the Out of Albuquerque Restaurant. Tables 5 and 6 show the internal intersection PM peak hour traffic f ow with the one-way westbound aisle closed. Campbell/Union Signalized Uri,.eway Figures 7 and 8 present the Friday (commute) and Saturday PM peak hour traffic flow at the signalized Campbell/ UniorvPrunc Yard driveway. The existing 45 foot wide driveway provides two exit iancs (one left -through option lane, one right -turn only lane) and one entry lane, separattd by a five foot w,de landscaped median. This driveway has a relatively short "throat" of less than 100 feet and can Lt expected to be affected by project traffic. to irnproce existing operation and provide for future traffic, the below improvement is suggested. Widr! the existing 45 foot driveway by 17 feet (10 feet on the east side entry and 7 feet on I%c west side exit) to a total of 62 feet. Remove existing 5 foot median and restripe to provide two entry lanes, and thrcr exit lanes (left -turn only lane, through only lane, nght-tum only lane). Revise adjacent parking areas to east and west of the widened driveway as appropriate Prov,de ccntetlinr guide striping, appropriate signing and end aisle parking modifications, to direct office traffic along the west edge of the site (behind the third office tower) to the new parking structure. I v U. i 1. l t k 5 Mr. David 1t. word August 21, 1997 Page Dour Project Traffic Generation 7 able I and Table 2 (following the figures at the rear of this letter report) present the weekday (Friday) and Saturday project :rip generation. Theses tabs ., are based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation publications as footnoted, and show daily, AM and PM and peak hour traffic volumes. On a weekday (Friday with office traffic), a total of 246 vehicle trips (21) in, 31 out) can be expected to be generated by the project in the AM peak hour, and 268 vehicle trips (61 in, 207 out) in the PM peak commute hour. Lxantination of Table 1 shows that most of the generated peak hour traffic is associated with the office use. The Saturday project PM peak hoer is tr-latively small at 93 vehicle trips (48 in, 45 out). The project will increase the total number of site generated PM peak hour vehicle trips by 1 L5 percent during the Friday peak commute hour, and 4.4 percent during the Saturday PM peak hour. Project Traffic Circulation Analysis Analysis of exislmg AM peak hour traffic flow reveals that 60 percent of the existing office traffic uses the signalized Bascom driveway and 40 percent the signalized Campbell/Union driveway. This distribution has been applied to all project traffic, since both the parking structure and Prune Yard Inn expansion are in the northwest quadrant of the site. Figures 9 and 10 present the Friday PM peak hour project traffic volumes distributed to the Bascom driveway and to the Campbell/Union driveway, and Figures I 1 and 12 the Saturday project traffic distribution. Looking at Figures 9 and 10, it can be seen that during the Friday PM peak commute hour, the project will add 124 outbound vehicle trips to the signalized Bascom exit, and 83 outbound vehicle trips to the Campbell/Union exit. Figures 13 and 14 present the Friday "existing plus pmjert" PM peak commute hour at the Bascom and CampbeHfUnion entrance -exits, and Figures 15 and 16 the Saturday traffic. Analysis of existing and "existing plus project" traffic volumes passing through these site access points indicates that project generated traffic can be expected to produce a 20.6 percent increase in Friday PM peak hour traffic entering and exiting the Bascom driveway, and a 21.4 percent increase at the Campbell/Union driveway White the project will generate a measurable increase in traffic at both the South Bascom and Campbell /Union signalized driveways, the suggested improvements are expected to mmiligalc any on -site impact. Mr. David R. Word i I u c August 21, 1997 Page Five existing Site Circulation Existing site circulation is primarily via principal parking bay aisles which are adjacent to existing buildings and parallel South Bascom Avenue, Campbell Avenue, and the Route 17 Freeway. Traffic circulation on the north edge of the Prune Yard consists of the two-lane property line roadway (with parallel parking on the south side) which runs along the north side of the shopping center and past the Prune Yard Inn, and a parking aLle on the office portion of th t site. Additional site circulation is provided via an east -west parking aisle, which runs from a right -turn in/right-turn out driveway on Bascom, through the shopping center to the traffic circle and ine-way (counter clockwise) circulat;on roadways which separate the office towers from the shopping center. Further north -south site circulation is provided by the unique two -bay parking area which adjoins the office use This parking area is a part of the shopping center and is bordered by a two-lane one- way counter clockwise roadway. Circulation between the one-way roadways is provided by a traffic circle, which also separates the parking area into two sections. This unique arrangement provides increased capacity, while inhi .iting the potential for office tenants to pouch shopping center parking Future On -Site Circulation Considerations In our opinion. the suggested access improvements at the Bascom and Campbcll/Union signalized driveways, coupled with the existing site circulation system, will be adequate to meet future traffic demand. However, some additional circulation features have been noted by the City and merit consideration. Suggested for consideration is the conversion of the existing one-way (counter clockwise) roadways to two-way operation. This would provide additional circulation for the new office parking structure. Two-way operation would also have the undesirable affect of increasing office access to the shopping center parking which adjoins the office towers. The ccunter clockwise direction of the traffic circle wouid also have to be reversed and curb retunt radii increased to accommodate two-way roadway traffic. Analysis of one-way versus two-way operation leads us to conclude that continued operation as a one-way (counter clockwise) system is more desirable than two-way operation. It has also been suggested that a roadway element along the west edge of the office towers and the north side of the new parking structure may be desirable. This would have a major impact on existing site parking adjacent to the Route 17 Frcewal. The expected peak hour traffic flow will have the existing west parking aisle (which currently operates satisfactorily) and the existing two ono -way southbound lanes, for access to the widened CanrpbelhUnion signalized driveway. Mr. David R Word August 21. 1997 I'age Six Since the existing circulation has adequate capacity !o tarty projected future traffic, it is concluded that an additional roadway element along the west edge of the site is not desirable. Campisi Way With the on -site improvements at the South Bascom and Campbell/Union signalized driveways, there wall be adequate capacity to accommodate expected project traffic. Although the extension of Campisi Way to intersect the Prune Yard circulation system is a desirable planning objective, access 10 Campisi Way is not needed in connection with construction of the third office tower and expansion of the Prune Yard Inn. However, from a site planning perspective, it is suggested that the Campisi xxtemion join the Prune Yard at a point opposite the cxi)ling two-lane i,orthbound roadway. This will allow an appropriate on -site intersection with adequate curb radii, an: sufficient traffic lanes to serve the parking structure, without major revision to the existing circulation pattern. A Campisi connection to the west would Fave a negative impact on the office component site plan and require a major change in the existing traffic circulatior pattern. Existing Parking Usage A total of 1,730 surface parking spaces are currently provided at the Prune Yard. Of this total, 992 spaces arc on the shopping center/inn portion of the site, and 738 spaces on the office portion of the site. A parking occupancy count was conducted at 2 00 I'M (the time of greatest shopping center parking d: mend) on Friday, July 11, 1997 and at 2:00 PM on Saturday, July 12, 1997. Figures 17 and 18 present the results of the Friday and Saturday parking occupancy counts by major parking area.. Shown is the percent occupancy and nu^tber of vehicles parked in each area. Also indicated are the areas which have an 85 percent or greater occupancy and arc essentially full. It is generally recognized that whri parking occupancy reaches or exceeds 85 percent, circulation is restricted and many vehicles are forced to search for a vacant space. At the 85 percent threshold, a parking area is considered essentially full, and additional spaces needed to park those vehicles in excess of 85 percent. I coking at Figure 17, it can be seen that total site occupancy at 2 00 PM on Friday was 79.9 percent. Parking occupancy on the office portion of the site is shown to be 75.9 percent, and on the shopping center/inn portion 82.5 percent. Further examination of Figure 17 revrals that the parking adjacent to the stores, and the parking areas tha: separate the office and shopping center, arc full at better than 90 percent occupancy. The parking area surrounding the two existing office towers is also full at 88.4 percent occupancy. _ Mr. David R. Word ° s August 21. 1997 Page Six Since the existing circulation has adequate capacity to carry projected future traffic, it is concluded that an additional roadway element along the west edge of the site is not dcsirable. Campisi Way With the on -site improvements at the South Bascom and Campbell/Union signalized driveways, there will be adequate capacity to accommodate expected project traffic. Although the extension of Campisi Way to intersect the Prune Yard circulation system is a desirable planning objective, access to Campisi Way is not needed in connection with construction of the third office tower and expansion of the Prune Yard Inn. However, from a site planning perspective, it is suggested that the Campisi txtension join the Prune Yard at a point opposite the existing two-lane northbound roadway. This will allow an appropriate on -site intersection with adequate curb radii, and sufficient traffic lanes to serve the parking structure, without major revision to the existing circulation pattern. A Campisi connection to the west would have a negative impact on the office component site plan and require a major change in the existing traffic circulation pattern. Existing Parking Usage A total of 1,730 surface parking spaces are currently provided at the Prune Yard. Of this total, 992 spaces a on the shopping centcr/inn portion of the site, and 738 spaces on the office portion of the site. A parking occupancy count was conducted at 2:00 I'M (the time of greater, shopping center parking demand) on Friday, July 11, 1997 and at 2:00 PM on Saturday, July 12, 1997. Figures 17 and 18 present the results of the Friday and Saturday parking occupancy counts by major parking area.. Shown is the percent occupancy and mc^tber of vehicles parked in each area. Also indicated are the areas which have an 85 percent or greater occupancy and are essentially full. It is generally recognized that whri parking occupancy reaches or exceeds 85 percent, circulation is restricted and many vehicles are forced to search for a vacant space. At the 85 percent threshold, a parking area is considered essentially full, and additional spaces needed to park those vehicles in excess of 85 percent. Looking at Figure 17, it can be seen than total site occupancy at 2 00 PM on Friday was 79.9 percent. Parking occupancy on the office portion of the site is shown to be 75.9 percent, and on the shopping centcr/inn, portion 82.5 percent. Further examination of Figure 17 reveals that the parking adjacent to the stores, and the parking areas that separate the office and shopping center, are full at better than 90 percent occupancy. The parking area surrounding the two existing office towns is also full at 88.4 percent occupancy. Mr. David R Word August21, 1997 Page Seven Figure 18 shows (hat on Saturday, the same Friday shopping center parking areas are full. The overall shopping center occupancy is slightly higher than Friday at 84.0 percent. At 2:00 PM the office parking ponnon of the site is 15.9 percent occupied. Table 3 presents the parking space inventory, parking count, and occupancy percentages in detail. Parking Design As a means of improving packing efficiency and responding to reduced vehicle width and the mix of smaller versus larger vehicles, a "unistall" parking space width of 8.5 feet is recommended. This will allow the new parking structure to have a single common parking space, rather than a mix of full size and compact spaces. A "unistall" parkin.- -?ace will improve circulation, since small car drivers will not be tempted io by-pass compact spaces and search for a vacant full size parking space. Moreover, large car drivers will not parkin a compact space and affect the utilization of (tie adjacent spaces. The "unistall" space will not affect the 65 foot width of a 90 degree parking bay. However, t a L0 degree parking angle, the bay width will be reduced by preliminary calculations indicate that a one foot to 61 feet ill width. Office Parking Ratio The City of Campbell office parking requirement is one space per 225 (1/225)gross square feet computed (GSF): 4.44 spaces per 1,000 GSF. While we are not certain of the existing offire GSF, we have sed on 120,000 net square ie office re k(NSF)ing `'Foracomparison, we have also researched our oriday parking tfficetfi rshof recent Office parking study data (based on NSF). 'Fable 4 presents the observed Prune Yard place office parking ratio and the ratios derived in three office building parking studies in the City of Newport Brach. Looking at Part A, it can be seen [hat the observed Prune Yard ratio is one space per 418 NSF (I /418), 2.39 spaces per 1,000 NSF. This is significantly less than the Code requirement (even though it is expressed in NSF). Part R of'I able 4 shows the other study parking ratios. T he three study ratios are shown to range from one space per 478 NSF(1/478) to one space per 438 NSF (1/438); 2.09 to 2.28 spaces per 1,000 NSF. The average of the three studies is one space per 463 NSF (1/463); 2.16 spaces per 1,000 NSF. Comparison ofthe figures shows the observed prune Yard parking ratio to be consistent with the other study data. 1 Lrther analysis of the Prune Yard data suggests an office use Code type design parking ratio of one space per 400 GSF (11400), 2.5 spaces per 1,000 GSF between net and gross, plThis is based o r a 10 Percent differenceus us 15 percent for circulation 1 (234.000x 1.1)/(,'x 1.15), 400J. On an NSF r t Mr. David R. Word August 21, 1997 Page Eight basis, the suggested design parking ratio is one space per 350 NSF; 2.86 spaces per 1,000 NSI... We have welcomed the opportunity to prepare this traffic access, circulation and parking analysis for Prune Yard Place. Should there be any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers /1 c M. reenspan, P.E. rncipal No. Diu * Lv• w3m * OF CAL Attachments 2659rpt.01 �yy SOl fM eASCOM AVENUE ra yn tl E 01 Z -:v- i U � I W c ` a iw z� a i6 I U NI O N AVfNUI 41 s53, o> S raw zg �R i ° ci II O V 1 1 1, 1 R E E W A Y W W J H T Cf) cr U w O J w g 0 ELui > U ^� a U Q cr 01 2Q `J Q LL 0 Z W I o�z zgu LL&G PASADENA TEL No.818-792-0941 Aug 22.97 9:02 No.004 F.11 N (n Q wi mt J le R < O ' _1) _ LL (V LL Q (C N n w a U C) Z U) X w a X w w a 0 r LLRG PASADENR TEL No.816-792-0941 Aug 22,97 9:02 No.004 P.12 SOUTH BASCOM AVENUE 53 3$4 -, N Z 0162 LL&G PASADENA TEL No.618-792-0941 Aug 22.97 9:02 No.004 P.13 LL SOU1H BASCOM AVENUE O % 59 Q a it I; 8 0162 W S- ul: LL&G PPSADFNA TEL No-818-792-0941 Aug 22,97 9*02 No.004 P.14 ----- --- — -- SOUTH BASCOM AVENUE , 53 32 IFIII to w co 0 w co z 0 0 0 co m a z F Do x w Is 2 LLBG PASADENA' TEL No.818-792-0941 Aug 22.97 9:02 No.004 P.15 tp Q a O a� J �p Y SOUTH BASCOM AVENUE U J a 0) Q < roe Q < i Big o U Z 1 it p x W I O� W ors Uj ad L[C U✓GC/YU eC. 4. 4t9JA\1".. V., . LLBG PASADENA TEL No.818-792-0941 Aug 22.97 9:02 uo.004 P.16 U LL �W za O Q EE z J > W < Ln m U a V z F R X PRUNEYARD UNION AVENUE W 47 53 93 — 127 0 Z 0. �fzZ ALU LL&G PASADENA TEL No.818-792-0941 Aug 22_97 9:02 No.004 P.17 °° U D U oLL � Y Qi CE Lu ` r s o J co > W a � m U d a Z F X PRUNEYARD UNIOPYfNUE W 52 6 � 10 - 3 W W �5u LL&G PASADENA TEL No.818-792-0941 Aug 22.97 9:02 No.004 P.18 0) U s u O� `t w 0- SOUTH BASCOM AVENUE F U 'a wo �5 O 32 �c 1 c .I li I Q i li m A it I I Q �z W W �gu LLBG PRSRDENH TEL No.818-792-094i — Aug 22,97 9:02 No.004 P.19 oU gu LL w o 1 W O z cr a O Z m � J w m CL ' PR U N E Y A R D J UNION AVENUE Q -24 -6 83 - 16 29 - 3 c M 0 Z Q LLBC PASADENA TEL No.818-792-0941 Aug_22.97 9:02 No.004 P.20 T Fle ^�.r T i � S I `_OUI H BASCOM AVENUE S U ag w 92 , ' e � a LL cr cr - I , m i I� LL&G PRSRDENR TEL tio.818-792-0941 Rua 22.97 9:02 N0.004 P.21 N U cwLL Q g� F- ' �W U a W 7 D 0 a rn z OL > Z < p Z 7 m d J � J < w m (Lc L Q Q PRUNEYARD UNION AVENUE () - 33 86 1 12 - 3 8 n bR • O ak 0162 W V'IV W Ing J g u LL&G PASADENA TEL.No.818-792-0941 Aug 22.97 9:02 No.004 P.22 ----------------- C.) U D u LL o� Q a CC- a > SOUTH B A S C O M AVENUE w (L Z O e T SB 346 , a) m li C7 ` 1B2 Z 32 X W i i!I• �1 li o li� Z d �,4W �g� LL&G PASADENA TEL No.818-792-0941 Aug 22.97 9:02 No.004 P.23 DU i � 11 z a I o o S z J J < m m Ua U W 7 FRUNEYARD UNION AVENUE oz OL 69 126 - 165 U' Z X W a Z LL&G PASADENA TEL P0.818-792-0941 Aug 22,97 9:02 N0.004 P.24 tl) U- cr a F 0- i SOUTH BASCOM AVENUE J Q 1 r 87 (o Q m co L I CL Z 20 30 F- Ln w }p I' i�II I I� LL&G PASADENA TEL No.818-792-0941 Aug 22,97 9:02 No.004 P.25 U cr Ly U LL Q a2 f'r d > Z O a Z � W Z Z J ai .J a a_ m Ud E � s O VRUF:EYARD UNION AVENUE cl: OL U) 7 J 0 - IL 38 _Z m X W w K 0 �IzZ YJ LLS 5Su LLBG PASADENq TEL No.818-792-0941 Aug 22.97 9:02 No.004 P.26 SOVTN BASCOM AV[NUS .-.--- .7 • ..1 .i............. r....... 1; I v f1I ; 1 •, 1 I VJ `) , 1 L ..... J ......i ` ...............r U g ................. • . ... .....r ---------------- -------------- : - a, ; * Z♦y� > a N 1 .....—..................... ................................................. 1, I t o V T l 17 I f l[ W A Y LL&G PHSPDENA TEL No.818-792-0941 Aug 22.97 9:02 No.004 P.27 S O U 111 BASCOM A V I N V[ .O V 11 II I IF WAS' 00 ^U co O O O N > z < U� Q D_ Q OJ Z cr 0 Q EC Q Ln LLSG PASADENA TEL No.818-792-0941 Aug_22.97 9:02 No.004 P.28 Llnscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers TABLE, 1 WEEKDAY PROJECT TRIP GENERATION (1] Prune Yard Place 0St21197 DAILY I AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR Ends (2] VOLUME (21 VOLUME [2] (Trip LAND USE SIZE VOLUME 1 IN OUT IN OUT I I PROPOSED I General Office (3) 130,000 GSF I 1.711 208 26 I 38 187 Hotel (41 54 RMS 416 7 5 23 20 'TOTAL 127 1 2111 31 1 07 (1] Source: ITE "Trip Generation", 5Ih Edition, 1991. and tTE "Update to the 5lh Edition," .995 [2) Trips are one-wey traffic movements, entering or leaving (3) ITE Land Use Code 710 (General Office Building) trip generation rates 14) ITE Land Use Ccde 310 (Hotel) trip generation rates. LL&G f'ASRDENA TEL No.818-792-)941 Aug 22.97 9:02 No.004 P.29 Linscott, Law S Greenspan, Engineers TABLE 2 SATURDAY PROJECT TRIP GENERATION [1] Prune Yard Place 08121 /97 DAILY PM PEAK HOUR Trip Ends [2] VOLUME [2] LAND USE I SIZE VOLUME IN OUT PROPOSED I i General Office [3] 130,000 GSF 296 25 22 Hotel [4] 54 RMS I 567 23 23 TO AL 863 48 45 [1] Source ITE "Trip Generation", 5th Edition, 1991, and I TE "Update to the 5th Edition," 1995. [2) Trips are one-way traffic movements, entering or leaving. [3] ITE Land Use Code 710 (General Office Buikfing) trip generation rates. Saturday Peak Hour of Generator used to forecast PM peak hour traffic vo;umes [4] ITE Land Use Code 310 (Hotel) trip generation rates. Saturday Peak Hour of Generator used to forecast PM peak hour traffic volumes. Saturday PM peak hour directional distribution assumed to be 50 percent inbound and 50 percent outbound. LL&G'PRSFDLNR TEL 41o.818-792-0941 Aug 22.97 9:02 No.004 P.30 TABLE 3 PARKING OCCUPANCY SUMMARY PRUNE YARD PLACE 09120197 FRIDAY 2:OOPM IATURDAY :OOP PARKING 07111/97 % 07/12/97 SECTION ROW SPACES OCCUPANCY OCCUPIED OCCUPANCY OCCUPIED NORTHWEST 1 16 44.4% 9 25.0% 2 34 14 41.2% 2 5.9% 3 34 8 23.5% 1 2.9% 4 29 17 $0.6% 2 6.9% 5 29 16 65.2% 1 3.4% 6 34 20 58.8% 2 5.9% 7 34 25 73.5% 1 2.9% 8 29 28 96.6% 4 13.8% 9 29 28 96.6% 8 27.6% 10 32 30 93.8% 5 15.6% 11 32 32 100.0% 6 25.0% 12 33 14 42.4% 1 1 3.0% SUBTOTAL 335 248 64.4% 1 11.4% WEST 1 24 24 100.0% 1 4.2 % 2 24 24 100.0% 0 0.0% 3 6 6 100.0% 0 0.0% 4 6 5 83.3% 0 0.0% 5 6 6 100.0% 1 16.7% 6 6 7 116.7% 1 16.7% 7 16 16 100.0% 8 50.0% 8 13 13 100.0% 2 15.4% 9 19 19 100.0% 1 5.3% 10 17 17 100.0% 0 0.0% 11 16 15 93.8% 5 31.3% 12 14 4 28.6 % 0 0.0% 13 22 18 81.8% 5 22.7% 14 10 5 50.0% 2 20.0% 15 11 11 100.0% 10 90.9% 16 9 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 17 10 10 100.0% 5 50.0% le 8 8 100.0% 5 62.5% 19 15 15 100.0% 5 33.3% 20 14 13 92.9% 6 42.9% 21 14 14 100.0% 4 28.6% 22 15 14 93.3% 3 20.0% 23 8 8 100.0•/6 5 62.6% 24 11 6 64.6% 2 16.2% 25 4 4 100.0% 1 25.0% 26 19 19 100.0% 1 6.3% 27 16 11 66.8% 0 0.0% TOTAL 353 312 66.4v. 73 20.7% TEL No.818-792-0941 Aug 22.97 9:02 No.004 P.31 LLHG'PA;ADENA TABLE 3 (CONTINUED) PARKING OCCUPANCY SUMMARY PRUNE YARD PLACE 05/20197 FRIOAY 2:OOPM ATURDAV 2: OP PARKING 07N1/97 % COUOPI D 07112/97 OCCUPANCY SECTION ROW SPACES OCCUPANCY ; SUOPIE S UTHWEST 1 4 1000% 1 25.OX 2 4 4 57A % 5 71.4°h 3 7 4 15 75.0% 7 SS.OX SUET AL 20 6 85.7% 5 71.4% T t 7 25 92.6% 25 92.6% CEENTNTRAA L 2 27 Y3 % 23 92.0% 3 25 Y5 100.00.0 25 100.0% 4 25 Y8 96.3% 27 100.0% 5 27 111 105 94.6 % 105 94.6% SUBTOTAL g SOUTH/ 1 9 6 100.0% 8 100.0% CENTRAL 2 8 6 100 0% 6 100.0% 3 8 6 60.0% 5 50.0% 4 10 96.0% 24 96.0% 5 25 2: 96.OX 25 100.0% 8 25 Y3 95.8% 21 $7.5% 7 24 24 Y4 100.0 % 23 95.8% 8 133 125 94.0% 122 91.7% SUBTOTAL 5 4 60.0% 4 80.0% NORTHEAST 1 3 16.7N. 11 61.1% 2 18 9 47.4% 12 63.2% 19 S 29.4'/. 7 41.2% 4 17 9 56.3% 5 31.3% 5 16 8 100.0% 7 87.5% 6 6 20 8 40.0% 8 40.0% 7 8 47.1% 9 62.9% g 17 4 100.0% 4 100.0% 9 4 11 10 90.9% 9 51.8% 10 2 50.0% 2 60.01A 11 4 70 ,4 7 6.1X SU TOTAL TEL No.818-792-0941 Aug 22.97 9:02 No.004 P.32 LL6G PASADENA TABLE 3 (CONTINUED) OCCUPANCY SUMMARY PARKING PRUNE YARD PLACE 08120197 ATURDAY 2:OOP IDAY 2:OOP % 07112197 h PARKING 07111197 OCCUPANCY COUOPIED OCCU9 ANCY CUPIE SECTION ROW SPACES ; 100.0 EAST 1 43 4 75.0 % 3 100.0% 2 3 12 11 91.7 % 100.OX 12 15 100.0% 4 15 IS 11 100.0 % 100.0% 5 1100.0% Al17 11 100.0 6 11 27 9J.1 % Y9 100 .0 7 8 29 25 24 96. 0 % 22 21 88.0% 10 % 21 21 100.0 % 100.0 % 20 .2 95.2% 1 O 21 27 4 100.o% 4 100.0% 4 35 35 100.0% 32 91.4% 100.0 12 13 S 4 00.0% 90.0% 5 10 100P % 14 1U 9 9 90.0% 9 A�.0, 15 10 14 100.0% 14 100.0% 16 14 14 14 100.0 % 14 100.0 100.0 17 is 14 14 100.0 14 14 19 14 14 '100.0% 100.0% 100 0% 20 14 14 '1 92.9/. 14 100.0% 27 14 92.9% 14 100.0% 22 14 9 9 90.0 % 9 90.0% 23 10 10 100.0% 10 100.0% 24 10 6 60.0% 10 100.0% 25 10 5 100.0 % 5 100.0% 26 5 20 16 80.0% 20 100.0 % 100.0% 27 28 4 i 100.0% 4 J69 97.4 % 379 360 95.0 % SUBTOTA 4 44.4% SOUTHEAST 1 9 4 27 44.4% 697% 26 78.8% 2 33 P1 70.0% 77 56.7% 3 30 70 1J 43.3% 12 40.0 % 65.7% 4 5 35 30 85.7% 23 4 100.0 6 4 3 75.0 % 4 100.0 % 7 4 3 75.0 % 5 100.0 5 5 100.0. B0.0•/. 9 S p 0.0 % 81.8 % 1 100.0% 10 11 9 7 87.5 % 8 100.0 11 8 5 62.5% 8 100.0 12 9 2 68.7% 3 100.0% 13 3 10 62.5°/ 15 91.8 14 16 8 88.9 % 8 88.9% 15 9 14J 88.1 % 152 72.1 SU OTAL 210 79.7 950 54.9% T TAL 1 730 1 378 LLW PASRDENi TEL No.818-792-0941 Aug 22.97 9:02 No.004 F.33 Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers TABLE 4 OFFICE PARKING RATIO Prune Yard Place w 00"UrVwDn oA01[INr. R1I2VFV OCCUPIED NET SQUARE FEET OBSERVED DEMAND SPACES ONF SPACE DATE (NSFI PER 1,000 NSF PER X/SF Friday, July 11, 1997 234,000 NSF 239 1/418 (2 W p m.) 0 ncurc cn �nme _ LIGIIUDADT RFACH _ OCCUPIED OBSERVED DEMAND SPACES ONE SPACE NET SQUARE FEET DATE NSF PER 1,000 NSF PER X/SF February 1997 298,768 NSF (90% occupied) 2.28 1/438 January 1995 303.458 NSF (90% occupied) 2.09 1/478 October 1993 1 224,300 NSF 82% occupied) 2.12 11471 AVERAGE 2.16 11463 08/21 /97 Ukib DAVID J. POWEM September 22. 1997 Gloria Sciara City of Campbell Community Development Department 70 North First Street Camphel!, CA 95008 RE: PRUNEYARD PLACE. Dear Gloria David J. Powers and Associates. Inc. (DJP&A) is pleased to present to you this proposal for the preparation of an Expanded Initial Study for the Pruneyard Place office development. BACKGROUND The project site is part of an existing mixed -use devel�pmcnt on 27.2 acres located on the northwest comer of Bascom Avenue and Campbell Avenue in Campbell. California. The western portion of the project site contains two office buildings. One of the buildings is an 18-story, 116.743 square foot high- rise office building. The other is a ten -story. 117,476 square loot high-rise office building. The eastern portion of the site contains an approximately 248.000 square foot retail shopping center with two additional single user building pads. The proposed project is a six -story, 120,000 s.luare foot oil -ice building to be located between the two existing building towers. A four-story parking structure is also proposed on the northwesterly comer of the site. In addition, the existing hotel will be expanded by 54 rooms. SCOPE OF WORK This sccpe of work is designed to prepare an Expanded Initial Study in accordance with Section 15603 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines and the City of Campbell requirements. Project Description The Expanded Initial Study will describe the proposed project based upon the information provided by the City of Campbell. It is our understanding the applicant is seeking approval of a Special Development Permit. The project description will also describe the intended uses of the Expanded Initial Study. it is our understanding that only the City of Campbell will be utilizing the Expanded Initial Study for project approval. The project description will include a description of the relationship between the proposed project and applicable plans, goals, and policies. E.%i nmenial t'unwllanle K Manner, A 1W Tm- A 1—da- Suac 2141•tixi Je.(-A V512h•Id 4418248 ttIM 1•Iae. 409. 248.9641 Gloria Sciara City of Campbel I September 22, 1997 Page 2 Environmental Setting, Impacts & Mitigation The Expanded Initial Study will identify the existing environmental setting in which the proposed project will be located. The Expanded Initial Study will include a environmental checklist and will be used to identify potentially significant impacts from the proposed project. The document will also describe proposed mitigation measures for all significant impacts. The Expanded Initial Study will contain maps, photographs, tables, and other graphics to illustrate and summarize information. The primary issues to be addressed in the Expanded Initial Study are anticipated to he as follows: • Land Use Noiw • Traffic, Parking & Cimolallo't Air Quality • Ccolugy & Sods A detailed description of the issues to be addressed in the Expanded Initial Study follows: Land Use The Expanded Initial Study will describe the existing surrounding land uses. Potential land use conflicts associated with the implementation of the proposed project will be evaluated. Mitigation measures will be identified in the Expanded Initial Study that could be incorporated into the project to mitigate sigrificant land use impacts. Traffic, Parking A Circulation The Expanded Initial Study will summarize the traffic analysis prepared for the proposed project by Linscott, Law & Greenspan Engineers which is to he provided by the City of Campbell. The traffic analysis addresses site access, circulation, and parking a,rects associated with the development of the proposed project. Mitigation measures will be identified in the Expanded Initial Study that could be incorporated into the project to mitigate significant traffic impacts. It is assumed that the additional traffic analysis to be pro, ided by the City of Campbell will Frovide adequate analysis of the project's impacts on the local and regional roadway netwo-%,. SEP-26-97 FRI 12:02 PA ➢AVID POWERS 6 ASSOC. PAX NO. 4082489641 P. 2 Gloria Sciara City of Campbell September22, 1"7 Page 3 Geology & Soils The Expanded Initial Study will describe the general soil, 9-technical conditions, seismic har]rds, and the potential ;or liquefaction and ground shaking based upon the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, "Soils of the Santa Clara County", and other available information. Mitigation measures will be identified in the Expanded Initial Study that could be incorporated into the project to mitigate potentially significant geology and soils impacts. Noise 11Expanded Initial Study will summarize the noise analysis prepared by Paoletti Associates, Inc. that is to be provided by the City of Campbell, will include a description of the existing noise environment on the site, and potential project generated noise impact' on surrounding land uses. The effects of Highway 17 noise on the project will be discussed, as well as the conformance with the City's Noise Element. Mitigation measures will be identified in the Expanded Initial Study that could be incorporated into the project to mitigate potentially significant noise impacts. Air Quality The Expanded Initial Study will describe the potential for air quality impacts, based upon the standards established by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). Expanded Initial Study Upon completion of the Draft Expanded Initial Study, we will submit 2 topics to you. The document will be revised in response to the comments received, and 1 bound copy, and a floppy diskette version will be submitted to you. The City would be responsible for the production of additional copies. Mwim 'Ihis scope of work inclxles Principle and/or Project Manager attendance at one meeting with you and the property owner on the Expanded initial Study, and at one public hearings on the Expanded Initial Study. DJP&A will be prepared to present the issues in the Expanded Initial Study at the public hearing, if requested by you. DIP&A will attend additional meetings, as requested as requested by City Staff. However, these additional meetings are not included in the attached cost estimate, and will be bided to the City on a time and materials basis in accordance with the attached cost rate schedule. o Gloria Sciara City of Campbell September 22, 1997 Page 4 BUDGET On the attachments, I have outlined our estimated budgets for the above -described for the preparation of an Expanded Initial Study. Please note that these are not -to -exceed amounts. Actual billing will be on a time-and-mattrials basis commensurate with work completed in accordance with the attached charge rate schedule. Payment will be due and payable on a monthly basis. SCHFO ILE A Draft Expanded Initial Study could be completed within the three weeks of delivery of project materials and a signed agreement from the City of Campbell. Sincerely, David J. Powers"'�`� Principal Attachment: Estimated Budget Charge Rate Schedule Representative Projects a REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS COMMERCIAL El Paseo de Saratoga Shopping Center Reconstruction Initial Study Client: Helios Partners Contact: Michael Pecar Address: 120 Leslie Lane. Orinda, CA 9456� Phone: (510)631-1178 David J. Powers & Associates, Inc. prepared the Initial Study for the El Pasco de Saratoga reconstruction project. The project consisted of the redevelopment of an existing regional commercial shopping center, including demolition of existing structures, and construction of new facilities for a net increase of approximately 17,000 feet on the site. The project includes a large Lucky grocery store, restaurants, banks and various retail uses. The project site is located in an urbanized area, adjac-m to the San Jose/Saratoga city boundary. Development on the site is constrained by surrounding commercial, residential and public school uses. The Initial Study addresses the following primary impacts: land use compatibly, traffic and circulation, noise, geology and aesthetics. Hayes Renaissance Conference Center Initial Study Lead Agency: City of San Jose Planning Department Contact: Carol Hamilton, Senior Planner Addr-,s: 801 North First Street. Room 400. San Jose, CA 95110 Phone: (408)277-4576 David J. Powers & Associates, Inc. prepared the Initial Study for the Hayes Renaissance Conference Center. The I!wes mansion is a designated City of San Jose and State of California Historic Landmark. It is also listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The project site is in a developed area, closely bordered by established single-family homes, recently developed condominiums and an aging mobile home park. The project involved the restoration of the building and grounds, and development of the 41,000 square foot Hayes Mansion with a conference center, restaurant, and guest suites. The Initial Study addressed the project's impacts associate9 with cultural and historic resources, seismic hazards, traffic circulation and parking, noise and air 3uality. COMMERCIAL Ps. I men A©■ a — MINE Casa de Fruta Expansion Projects EIRs Lead Agency: County of Santa Clara Advance Planning Office Contact: Hugh Graham, Senior Planner Address: 70 West Hedding Street. San Jose, CA 95110 Phone: (408)299-2521 David J. Powers & Associates, Inc. prepared EIRs for two successive expansions of the Casa de Fruta, a roadside service and vacation destination facility, located on Highway 152 in south Santa Clara County. In 1982, David J. Powers & Associates. Inc. prepared an FIR to expand the facility to include 200 recreational vehicle (RV) spaces, a miniature goircourse, tennis courts, group picnic and playground areas, softball fields, parking facilities, and miscellaneous supporting services. In 1992, David J. Powers & Associates, Inc. prepared a second FIR to expand the Casa de Fruta to allow 400 new RV spaces, a seasonal crossing of a creek, and a waterslide feature. The EIRs addressed the following primary environmental issues: land use, drainage and Flooding, vegetation and wildlife, traffic, water supply and quality, waste water disposal, loss of agricultural potential, urban services, and population and housing. Bourdet Properly General Plan Amendment Project E!R Lead Agency: County of Santa Clara Advance Planning Office Contact: Hugh Graham, Senior Planner Addr�w: 70 West Hedding Street, San Jose, CA 95110 Phone: (408)299-2521 David J. Powers & Associates, Inc. prepared an FIR for a General Plan Amendment and Rezoning to allow future roadside commercial development in southern Santa Clara County, adjacent to Highway 152, near the Casa de Fruta facility. The project redesignated the site from Ranchlands to Roadside Services to allow for a gas station, fast food restaurant, full -service restaurant, and assorted retail uses. The FIR addressed the following primary environmental issues: land use, loss of agricultural potential, waste water disposal• water supply and quality, traffic, and urban services. 3400 Hillview Avenue - Xerox Headquarters, Stanford Research Park EJR Client: Keenan Land Company Contact: Chop Keenan Address: 700 F,merson, Palo Alto, CA 94301 Phone: (415)326-2244 David J. Powers & Associates, Inc. prepared the FIR for this project which included the redevelopment of a 16.3 acre site. resulting in the replacement of the existing older industrial facility with a new 206000 square foot headquarter building for the Xerox Corporation. The primary impacts evaluated in the FIR included traffic, vegetation and wildlife, visual and aesthetic quality, cultural resources, geology, hazardous materials, and employment/housing. COMMERI / 1 L h. 2 man i®s a Del Monte Plant Redevelopment Initial Study/Negative Declaration Client: Reynolds and Brown Contact: Peter Reynolds Address: P.O. Box 4057. Concord. CA 94524 Phone: (510)674-8400 David J. Powers & Associates, Inc. prepared an Initial Study/ Negative Declaration which included the redevelopment of the existing Del Monte Cannery with a 155,000 square foot community shopping center. The project site is located in the Fruitvale District of Oak land and is surrounded by a mix of industrial, residential and school uses. The issues evaluated in the Initial Study included historic and architectural resources, aesthetics and visual impacts; transportation and circulation; hazardous materials: noise: air quality; and construction impacts. Midtown Mixed Use PrGiect Initial Study Client: Safeway Stores, Inc. Contact: Richard Ziatunich, A.I.A. Address: 2066 Clarrnar Way, San Jose, CA 95128 Phone: (408)295-0600 This Initial Study addressed the redevelopment of a former Sears site with a mixed use project, including a 54.000 square foot supermarket, fast-food drive -through restaurant, 292 dwelling units, and public park/open space. fhe project site is in an older. built-up area of San Jose. Nearby land uses included commercial development, a railroad. an old cannery, and a variety of both new and aging industrial uses. Primary issues addressed included traffic, air quality, noise, hm-ardous materials, and land use. Chevy-Geo Auto Dealership Initial Study Lead Agency: City of Morgan Hill Planning Department Contact: Terry Linder -Associate Planner/David Bischoff -Planning Director Address: 17555 Peak Avenue, Morgan Hill, CA 95037 Phone: (408)779-3117 David J. Powers & Associates, Inc. prepared the Initial Study for the Chevy-Geo Auto Dealership and Simonsem'DeRose Property Rezoning. The project included the rezoning of the site to allow the development of an auto dealership and commercial uses. The project also included street dedication and construction to facilitate access to the site. The project site is located in Morgan Hill, on East Dunne Avenue, directly adjacent to Highway 101 and is surrounded by residential, commercial and highway uses. The primary issues evaluated in the Initial Study included: traffic and access impacts; noise: and aesthetics and visual impacts. (OHMER"4L h. i mom o �®s E�ANDED INTITIAL STUDY for the PRUNEYARD PLACE DEVELOPMENT 'Volume 11 Technical Traffic Appendices CITY OF CAMPBELL OCTOBER 1997 F N G I N F F R S TECHNICAL APPENDIX TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY PRUNE YARD PLACE CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Prune Yard Associates. LLC 1999 South Bascom Avenue. Suite 200 Campbell, California 95008 Prepared bp: Linscott, l.aa & Greenspan. Engineers 234 East Colorado Boulevard. Suite 400 Pasadena. California 91101 Phone: (626) 796-2322 Fax: (626) 792-0941 October 13, 1997 1-972659-1 TECHNICAL APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS t raffix Intersection Data Worn heels Appendix Descriptions A -I Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour A-2 Existing Conditions PM Peak Hour B-1 Existing + Approved AM Peak Hour B-2 Existing + Approved PM Peak Hour C-1 .ixisting + Approved + Project AM Peak Hour C-2 Existing + Approved + Project PM Peak Hour D-1 Existing + Approved - Project W/ Campisi Extension AM Peak Hour D-2 Existing + Approved + Project W/ Campisi Extension PM Peak Hour E-1 Existing - Approved + Project Wi Transit-TDM AM Peak Hour E-2 Existing + Approved - Project W/ Transit-TDM PM Peak Hour F-1 Existing - Approved + Project W/ Campisi Ext. & Transit-TDM AM Peak Hour F-2 Existing - Approved + Project W/ Campisi Ext. & Transit-TDM PM Peak Hour G-1 Existing + Approved + Combined Project AM Peak Hour G-2 Existing + Approved + Combined Pi oject PM Peak Hour H-1 Existing - Approved + Combined Project W/ Campisi Extension AM Peak Hour H-2 Existing + Approved + Combined Project W/ Campisi Extension PM Peak Hour 1-1 Existing + Approved + Combined Project W/ Transit-TDM AM Peak Hour 1-2 E:.istin, Approved + C'ombined Project W/ Transit-TDM PM Peak Hour J-1 Existing + Approved + Combined Project W/ Campisi Ext. & Transit=TDM AM Peak Hour J-2 Existing + Approved + Combined Project W/ Campisi Ext. & Transit-TDM PM Peak Hour Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers APPENDIX A- Trattix Intersection Data W(,rksheets EXISTING CONDITIONS AM PEAK HOUR wwm:nu WISHES= .- #e.eG.&x§ a, ;_§: w \ w t in! Am ; 11 011 , �,��,m�,��: ::; e..��. WOE �j A 9§2/\ Q m—u -mmsu2u 2Jea2 /�\w\\ \aJ2y2waoa/s=©«qe: ; ;�\/q//bfaeb\a&a/2g�2AtsGg. /!{/««»« RR99«6g« . /l \£ iA! . . QQ Jai am .� ///N)\;l\: sill ` IV /§ OEM sia»sge9g�29�a2�2%\( /Fi .::,. eeSReGg\3916:Jh0b- { x .. \21:� \ h\ d \j Iia!w RR »3§ \:tr.. { ® a®a`\2w22a2 Haiti ^' { HEN ^8^oa-gSZ,:s ' as*" o _ ry88NR: Y 888' e88o'g88 8oR -88-R: •; N8« fi88� fi88« 8.8R' '• «8$« �; ;;� '- �sN":88�'a888 8088 _ _ '•88�8� x °:P:?¢o-88-823;827 s 12; !889 1 LS Y8: 888'3885 88081 '88A; ! 8:8RI S ^S! •88^.8 S 8esoo88o0.88" �� •:iFlx R8- '88,-588_I�8.8R� -�^88^^' :Sid' ••..t ;��;:i_'z.. ��8...'i ?�g�i8 Xs'� 1 safe?leii��?iaa�cio�aaid: x § §�§ , 1, ° ! °leeeee®°°°:a.l ;¥2°1 ; ..7 .....! ~ ° ed !!! Eei,aigeg ) / / u-. /........ |■!_; ! !!'�!-� ......... #:i:: 1 g!g ©}o98: .. w . loll, .... , 91: \\3 &ee® 7! « 2 gR:{6e2ea�! �w a w�.a2.2/2�; AMA: � |•�.�� .�... ..... ... | | _ .. \t7 2 /�/�i 8c; ;9!!u! e§ -- Z�2\ ~® ,.t2gj ;�!!!■ ;f,: §/!o/...\ � 2/e , ■;_::! :! :! ° ; ;§�°�E;¥�°�§#;. l;;,: _:��; �e94-: .. _ ... _ ... _ .... ;;�} . 981 982... 22 . 5 , �| /wGc\j§z.UC,0l— i!|twe«��:: \,i�@: d.IaFIE�d£a /%/gag. ssseOssss-sass; 8aa� �s ^sa^s8 'e�'�e��ge�i a88--8s8a-s88s! sa:.c' - psi ^.88.,e ^ss^^ 88:Oe"as- gas Z ix jg ;>-o m; 88ReOR88x-8888' 8:8R1 ^.8 ^•88' !81y•:s:3=i' 88.ee.SB-e.88 � 1L8 3 - « Yee :8: 488"'88ei 8988 988'=: I b �I�1:1: _ 't"o» a8SeOS88seS88s' 8S,8e "gg��' 8 z3z**:88ne:8S:; 8:8s: a e88«• 8 'ss<--68s�e$gs- suss ..a e "ss" s "' 7 _.Hiles :7;>2o` a_�€€ in"! yi8a as: i8u"3'8 ism a'�: ` 8.' 880, e » 8o:S! 8o8R: 92' 1881-: :Rim: ~ ssa �ssae ssr' suss' -8s--' �; �a� i a-= RBxeeosesesaos- 8o8R e. a `5'`i€8-e es� sss= sss=' 89:a' .8... ^^ 0•88` 888�I ^.88%-: eca^ �8evi sssepssss=sass! s„;. :sd'iA Sage :sage ss ..22 i8-..:.-: _ o ��caa,saan�bE Linscou, Law & Greenspan, Engineers APPENDIX A-2 Traffix Intersection Data Worksheets EXISTING CONDITIONS PM PEAK HOUR =7;;4 / , e{ 9rj °! .. !■!!: ::l':; , , sso--gg-: ,.g-8: _. . - � : ; ! :!; \o.gg ;/� , � \/ � t:iw7-4 e7 nea= �- � �.. a .. �a.��`� . �� ■. aQ ' eHKHR.5 \5gw��a>G#£sgg: \\J :�\9Z.: RSJje& .l2JS\ rEggEr#;�� Qdj9.aet: !!{�=;{t ) 3n:" �� sx �aa� �sss ewes �- ?�^ :a: :8s::s8: Mai _ a: 'sago' = e == ssss �z� "`s�t?ss asa a8sa :ssa save` e ' ~^^ �88geO88� -08R1 3 s�: 'fie 888e888Y' «88eOn88RoR8881 a no I - . ... .s 8..... Yo 8Ri a Me 1 g"s_uie Yse - `ae :,sesoeee88eeesse aasei sesi vase`s .3 0`0: _ _8eeeu88eeee8u= segR_ g ?8 e88ve� 9 ? . t „8weee88eee88ei s8�-i ag. i1'i1 s8s assa + -ssei o e :sssa= a 8�'1S = = n8ze'88�'«seal 18891 = ":88«: a8eeee88eoe8So' as8ei8 '8'g�e88ee: HU l§'b . 1999 S. BASCOM AVE. S 97-20/UP 97-11 3 OF 6 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLAN. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCS. 12/99 § , ®ee®e\ rga¥2: e% �� : � � /)))Q(��'/©~/©//'//�\�'//� 8.' E/;§ 3: SS\ -.!:!! :■ .u.,- ,l:: ; o,91» e©® E� 21. 5� - / 2\52jR22225§ . ,. ...,. - � .�>.z.#�■:! : ;2@§j/§§/2963w»eeJw«[w\b! .\.139: Q«55ag22g3E%/e5a6: »e xe,a»:la;as, ; :■ :�.� , ,�,��,-. �_.-_ -®.-� /'2/� ,.�, � ................ §: go : R�..9»R9;..... §\�/g5 !; .!■! !;»!! s� G§:g§�� \:ss E= ,. ... ee=; =��n, .;:; .. f � :§.:!§:°! ...... / \// \� . ,|* :§;).!§;°! � t:*.I,: lJ�labp/d§/�szw l: :�x�©®a;©�■®,-62� Zw©-;®. \ �)\9##Ja£g«\gabgzagz#at#�6: :�)._ , _ .l;��=§•_�_§�_! !!§-{ _ ��I w■aw.i !/.;.°.; _,_°°;.._� §:;. �,�.� , �.. w■■w■! �� , .;:. ■. •9:_: ..•. ! ;!' .l.,��§�.�:l�§. )�■/. ..... .... :� ),-\ °-\ ;§�§\ !|!!\ \.%/n.nm!: . }j /;c; : § i22�22G/\S. g.32 |ar/ ■|'Is, �!§■\! :�;; l, ;,. ;■■; �,■_■■ ' ■■ .. ,;_��_;§_°l��=. ■(■r' | 2�' 2#■2.! \\*,\\.\ !;/\\ 8 !A: 788: /j j. / -;� .!!°°;!S!°!!§!.!■;,■;|c;6' . �. ■■,.: \ .\j�J��2a\222jE2'�G% \ 13di 7 _,_��__,-°:■;=I ism = -!A: l■■l-! 2) jt\ A.;1 ... . . . g.;.;x )} (;" .} �.} .■_�°_■,:°„;■{ ■;■,! ::._} l9!"= \\�\ /� / |: ::��: , _;_��!■�=�!„n; §1��; ;-,::■g:-! 2 \/ o}225 295}q@}§2}ate\ !§!)!'.l. .\��_!■_°_•/;� Is}�. §-|.■■/-! °; °2� =s=��=sl=°;sl=. ■�|�. |:,_ !■■!.! ; . .. .. .-C; . /§ ) }Rye 8f a'... \ { @ m // |:■:� :�.= jJm/)/j \:\}.§!!\\� ..;. , .. . it z /`/ j . �.:;:|'.� ;,;- ■,�,|!, . . ■,l. hu! ■ : )\g§\/t>\\gGzw�/es■: Linscott, Law & Greensprn, Engineers APPENDIX B-1 Tra:fix Intersection Data Worksheets EXISTING + APPROVED AM PEAK HOUR / � �� I u 11 t 1 M - ' - �8:e:88:' 883�' - •:8�3�': Saga: �88" - eRerSa83'38a3 gaga a IM " 5 ee.88...Os.: -_- 8 ^88^ 3 p88pegss- g8_ 8o:e PaB:^ �: . . oE: • P890 s8:I:9 8S 8s:8' ':88^•:: ii�i€:Asa^•^sa^'_ysa:-i1. ioE' ..wsa". Zi _.is••e � >> >a�s d_,4€..e�" ias:c,a>c">.:aa.p - esao s8s�i jazz: - •as;a Z8s_ 8or" e-.85•": gags: s '88-": o .. = '- e-- :o: 'x88Sea88a 8a8r '8e��' 8a8s' s c!a; esaa ge^.e"gg^.^g8^ ssa:' . Sto '88w: ^88— `06:8' 3883 :88" Pas:Rel •88--' ..o8so.ogs- a-sos- s �a' esaoei ---,s-A-s1 r"11 �`'�3as`�� fia.a,Is _see ? c,»aDci eS3si�aat€ ? -- \ — 62cG\%9a - 1 t ge3A \§ I °.I „;.==a®�°-■Sri 992(I : "•I ;l�;©! `J&m 8;82.;2.22\k / X X / jj%\), \ /� , �.|: !: -. °, ,;:�-�„;.;.,;, .¥s,, _:�;, -!$•:� | i)!� :;�■� f . :;. -:_-: _ .:_ ..,�! .... -8 /n: , f^ "2999;g9;|2.2\§� }!�i)��°� ,.:■/_°_\\_� ;|/;, ; :@� \)§�-! I |;; .� :.. . .. _. _ _ .:: � .,:...■ ! ! _;: °';!§_°_�§�{ §�§s} | �P} �§■�-! ; /&/)10 aa.�;w:Gw��:| ae©5\j \2tGwQR2i2il ■Ef!! . r„ 3P/Q{9q£:� z HAG£wx/i�lg/a�CA- A£�a�:; .I ; �_�„<§■;°�!§!i !§§w} § :2{ :!§;-| 2}�\\\ a\s/�\/��sd '!!! :!i!|�-. �!� .; .; . ..:! !!�\�}{gq}R21aSd �|�|��)) !§|�:•.,.1,�� \��.=j�_�.� .� ...� �:.�� |-.: ! .� ��- �■_ .§�-; §�l=; � ®�� ,l�:'! §Ij 4 j\5 ��/'/ /}�K�/�9/\/\��° ^qs� G.2 s rEe9RR95g5 § ,g2z: ; s. . z . . I . . § .\/ae \ ' 0j / � � y| ■ Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers APPENDIX B-2 Traffix Intersection Data Worksheets EXISTING + APPROVED PM PEAK HOUR V O ),-I. ,�7 ......,g�..;!!_! §■!§f :°:!';�|°�� _;_��_,■=��al=� §■,_; ; \_� ws■w.! ! \s\ao/— § �::�: s;�■ ! |;®!{ 9: ;�§;•| ! E2�o1c; R:fig\ l'\ :g£! _ \ago ,\! : ---- �■;, ,.... n:l.; No.. , :�-;;! .:. -:;: _:::; _::l; �:_:; n�;= ! \_§\;2:°=.,_. ,-.„ : ,-,:■,��! ! ��„■\.°,\,�\ �■\\\ ■ } ..j.,{ � ;::;-| ! �.„. a.gwa,e�2,w=l: g:ag .— z .2|.JJ.: ..t§\/b�/5a�§��@w£9 E■■\�q■:� : ` ° ` !§E°°es■;�:sl�i |!2�\ :@{ :■■:;; c; !! -; !§;�;,s■!°lss2� !;�l� " �!� 2��2`{ Vic; )( {:®! .f .f ;�;°�!■§!°l�•;{ 1; §; :;f :■■�_! ; c; ///DER\: ss:.:;;o, ;;; .:4!9, *"so.: ! 3/) { \}/®®s®\r\q/\//\\/ '■ , li °�; o__° : :�':|:�■ !|�.�2* ,..�� . . , : •; |;e | °; ,�; E��e°B��e: 8939, | ::§■:_! ■ \\/\./�r&�:^s IF�}|!■! . ..... ... !|!|{ :.._ ! | |.■ -:.: , ( �.\ \jI"�.\ss�-=s■={ ||!|{;§!;!{ � jai_' ■ ,s�-�x� , r��!! | ,;o..� \:s�&/j§/)&a� � i2/-..4.Zl� §^ ]/ ^;>\§u :S o0Ar 0 '8: Sul 1 OR LY' . a « Nov TOY QJS g�� oNoryaory'o8��r.,.. �S`o�m'r .Roler�� E§ 1:8 ;.■ � - ! � ' ` , ` °;°°°°■■�°°::�T =�,°T ; Lei :wae®; ::'�■ °; ;; :.: ; =;u : � ©a. �;;® ; ) )26`:2�.f \!;\; ;\);zl) „o. :\�/j\\ , �!!!: !; \ :§: 2� .. #I !i::i. _; .. \l . , ac; >.: Stu: t §w/§z z bRS j G /\g/\ //s\/ /1HU% /...\\ }\/��\}�. \}\/. ...l: c; �;; og��!§ ° .. .1.9 ` ! :!T e;,e1! e! §x§ , �... . /�/%j 2911X,2©//;/ ae:#a:aew 1� Ic; -;^o ! oo| 8,--- !§°} !!|°! ® :§! ..... . : +�,.■7—;a��#®se\ve/\° ,:■: : !!�;! ;;®®��;,�,�„�;jE; :;;. ee■e�: m.; w w at;:2 Ic; 2 w d§ 7 7 . a x 2.. E�§e�)� ■ta99eEr: .�: �!.»|' ;;, -■.� �.�....�|:�l�#,��l;�;:,alp■ : § | � w ..7 Z __.. ...... ..... !! -- � .� �.� __ �,,,,!°!§•!{ !^®!{ : �;{ l,.�-{ ; c; .; //� £ ■: , oo, ,�._;§Se ..9 ., _. . °E!!®; !!!!; � ;_: 2■!2:! , /\ /} ��■ `��!!`: , :! ,� �°� =;,°.Ei;:�§s)n� §J;,� �',_; ;;;�-! ! |'§ '!))�) § �,.\ �\\ j\}°'=\\\°§■�\\ !\■\\ \ �\\ \.a\-) f !; . _ _,,,=°=,■e�||!!!��' ;/;�g!!2�) � a@s�r§a@s; wxawzoaw2�=:; c , . ... ]..j��:. t Q2 aQRG\|j22wR§»a�w� - — \d�a�{w&C!§ :® ®. )e! /=-a2e\G</2®2/®Jg --,•i_°-, e:=°°!§§!°!§�:; §§f=� ! !§; :••�'� Z \\ ®\//// /SS7Z27 /\ \_\.,.-:;- -;_-� _.-_� � _�� _�_■ ; |�� • !'.!. ;sB��;.■;. !lz:; a: :ci, ...._! ; ,■':§: , :! .I ° ; _;_°-_■�_°_!■_� ■•§�� !/|� ;!!; { | ��f!!! : ! ) � f ,2.,,!!\!°esl=\ !�_`� ° ^-I �■■�-� i]:R »Q/J:8 ;:— :ga/ /\ej�sQw\3�.{�t) Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers APPENDIX C-1 Traffix Intersection Data Worksheets EXISTING + APPROVED + PROJECT AM PEAK HOUR US \{, \C5==sp,lrt ins 0 2}�/\ !■! !:!!;l;� �°: �§��e;��, �.��. � :;: �„:°: !i! ! ��i � Hl/j/\ {\clots �!!K:: i .i ,\,©;:r§=°=!§_} ■§§r} !l;71 ]§!2°{ lies" �Jya j2�\// lGafg//§©�222gq\aLI a@##s E/ R>aawjretR m. , /{//\jGtg«/Ja�ae^gza6w�aa: `w»5gy@©l©9l®9(Sg\ s.. ee®e©aC.R9��9�%J\ J: ® }.�®eC2Rl\R1gg.ZT nni M ! ®!§_;/ \ g % 2\-2/sa§G/.\//\ §q . gJ9 R2 ��j»wlRwz'..: .lps® IHEM !© N t�\®jp-.1i9&abaa6%w#a�a£ :`)�. �.I =#_��_!!�°�s■:{ ■!!:{ ! :|{ :#�;-| |�;!|�-� .'-��:/s=�=s■:� ■■_;� _ �:� �##�-) @. e/� //.SEE.—! � rj `! . -- .- _ --:_: �:.�! _..■ !: !2 ! .T °.I §§!�^!■•!°_■§!{ ■¥!�f !::|I las; o a1: 1Z, 2- w' ; \ :".;�:|: .l..�.l;.�.�l.� |1; | 21;. ) : @ _, . !§!°■!§!I°I§§!; §�!!� ] 2|. .`®: a;■,. \;;�.) ! ! �^c; c;mr/f !'!_, ! ' t o2, -:!! .� §;;;!„ ;§l��.■:_~, .._;� ■,,. |! ( .)!; jar.§ { /4� a.& u�. ! . \C. J| � 2|�� ! � {{q§�j�{dh/\G��\j■�i///ga\{` e :�■�°■ss,-,aa,} |�|�{ | `§{ `■■�;! |� ..�H� @§§�!§s■§°§BE: �a2. |;:l. 2'!2�! !|';! ;§:�*IM-§aa:� |§�§. | \�' -!887 299—tssl*lsM |!8!} : �v ,■■�a: o .. , . .. �; :!'�;l�-; ■■_ ,■■,■■■' .' .,��: E / ,/) 26�a19 529...... \ §Q; 4 ■ ,� .5....„ ...Ea |.:l; :■■:°) .. .!;| . ||. £�:2 &!9®©@®er222{s2\22%� .. .. . �� , . , � . \ \��#—/■��§�;��\! k.■§ .� !�! - . ._\\� x//, |§B|} |�■ �°�!:! ` � .�:■s:°:.■§{ �:■,\ _l; o| J.=:! /�\/j2 �� ; .,.. _ � ., . . ■��.,.e ,.��'..�-: a \}§ � ��. o" 'S��•..00� oa000088000 g• so = e = _ = 143:a` Y7� - o E~r oo; a0000000000 = _ _ Ss � r. Yj� A. .... .... `VOQ a ecoo,. xi _ �;r - _ i�owipso ie iss_^ -zit>3a d€��:,aas�W� aads Sa E e 'ol o000000$00008'; �81 >gX:� o. . ". Bzi � ssi a o I--- .." "8So- "a8=- _ e 988 a�: ": e��i $6' �� .. oo ".. o .... .ono ••' .."f oaoo:19 ogoo. It �> a�•;sp>eE�� '��•," �� aT4`; i €a aa. ax 48 1 y €�IUozi €d..�Z.iaa23i., >ca>;.saas��i ee SS:e��88�'�88� 88a^wT^88•:: SS«e e88�e:88�' 8a:^' '88•«: 7;~tBEe 588:'•88:' 8�85 E• Se�eOR88A'A88R 8�8R' M88« o t,*�y3{�e`8ae8i a :Ri ^.88n': o :HefY�. - 588:"885' '88^.R' jtje _ S88:er88S' MA. } �Fiu Ro5eO:88.e:88"' 8:8e1 e - �88$^ e- ^o'; sg:�:S_M::i� Y e NeR^88eee88^_'gg e88'! a �'88 Y"le go88 R--AA: a• _^: �� 87tOe�887�'888� � a8o88 � > : Rd � ZSS 16 �4:3ff'f,r:��'r4arreei� :iaalr>ss�aaF� _:ss:e:ss: ' a ci 8s ex:ss:e:88v sosxi e - r:s� li .lt 's Is:868R e - nav ] •�; y ; RBRe' p $2: :usts'ee'-88�e^88�' 885� p " i a ^<i �gg�_ ! eReOR88ReR88R' 8Oe i P s:8= :e1t:88:':88:1'=�00"'1 o: 7sw!' id �e1L• CIS ap�ri>�5>Eraax$: Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers APPENDIX C-2 Tratiix Intersection Data Worksheets EXISTING + APPROVED + PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR 9!!%exJ,p a;xe:ea;e%�ge�29e g!l;E:2 o;;..ogg.! g 92: �:ee.{ � °;: ; e!. ,!l...!#°� 2 ) Ra©2911u )6 �£«Gcs��: 1 '88-•: „- '88"�88�1 88�z� S -88^•; jg�: •3�68eiE�eei .",88."e.",88.",� 88:_! Mw � 'u s IT: ¢t ++•el - « a88"e«88«' $8eRI '88-5• a '. 3 �•E�i: �~ ss-••�ss�•_ss-' ;.aRi a•�ai ..a 'O1 s89seassx jso;• _s8^-'• �.. 'sans' - '8 C xs :as::ss:;F - i8-38^ ._3�9�:��i�::`�i�i��?=si�$��zcia�:3��8t€�i�aa�s�' •. �e- ee- neryeo�sENersar- 8s.^,,�- - "8 s'a7 ia�b «?��e� �e^•�:ss•=-ss-' sss_ a .. .ssVs: -ee - s8sresss�' s:s= e e- s Y# • e Se i ^ R So' ie�; ��as: "•asOOesse s:a=! s �s c!ssc!•: o i$z e- boo 'sg• ^asei §ss s �a; �sse•' L� Y]'.'�€`• - .«88'- «889•r88�' a• e88• '88• "8e8'18 '8' 1 �' 7fF�A - S88_•5883'�8�8RI ��'_ • :��|�;|!\�' \/\\\\j/ /Imr \ ){ !;:: .� °.! E:E°:!!§!°■§!`� !§§!� 2 ;§� 2!!;"! ` _. ( M �"|,.,� §£\�9 CO..I _ . .:imllm!noq :��: '{�_�J®o#;a\;;/:2r� l\� ))|�)!�}!! -; '�a®�t®®E®«e�aeIE ��aru� ;;'.!`° 111 !A"Mm"2'22\5_::)�/ M.0 ;};°:e\/■°„E_.�\;;,.- '; ! : - ,.�lEJ»2 E2ag2Rg;aost�&�� . am: ! 2g§a\/a@i/a9'w\5;/&Q£s/!!! Mi n ) &�&Q�gGp�G: }�.! -; .. .. .W. �, : :,�,:, , -, °; . . : | !!w�!!-� 0 1 ,;��;,�.�§§®� !!§°i # a w' -�°� 2 !{ ! a e2aJ�a��e©ee�re�;e�CCe Mi10 /.//.\�r/©//�//�£ 1|ga! T "®2»W#It®',®l- 1/!\!| �'�! | ;, \{/�.,j\,�}\/}� ilia!\}; i ° 101 , !|�� ° .. �� Fit .. °{�\( //\//j §:■:- `! ,: : ,/i, _o;_ :;: w / ~ 4\ x ! h |ja / whR/\»§� aR991!2i § ��E .! \998 -. : : )■\�» ,�� §��ee��§e°� «;;°� B ea. e;Be®! 9®®9®9R;ryl2;9.1e/ 3;2\\ ,l;�: ; �;_� ®; ■e. -:��_ =�e=; :m!!� §l25� ;§l::: .- !!!■:: ;,l:: \§\;i;;\§ /\tr#R§ (\/gJatgags�&&/g/lEeGE2g: _: � .. .e ; ■�� ; e ;e; wee; : §!z:/ &{x®®g®aria»}laieed Ic;I�-: !■a!! �� . .. .. _ .�. _ �. _ ,... :110 jl�:;B . . ;;E:I c;c; . \\��;\ .:■ a 2� e� �2� „:■: ° ° ° ° ° �j \ !.§®g j2%/w�R/b§»,Rtg�■! :\/{waRrp§ )g §jh{02:a2 wa�aad£: eel 363eS^88 a 8806- a �s -!88"!:! i f : ��' � t BSSe"'588.,e•,885 � 8o8ei e. _ 3883e• �- 388'e�88' $ege = .as..: Q�• :08 :�`�Yge^I - �88'e'88«' 8e88� ^:• ^•88^•"' o ;88�.-88�' 8:8�; -!as.!:!: ass-:�: 3 � Ate• � C3: 8< � 3�fe« .. ...:^' �.:" Ro«� a ne � ..:-:": f��`«oFit '•88��' « E$ • 03e '88'e8888' 8:8R' ^Si ^88"e' = 8p all ^.S 'I�$is„�'•�`?��,^' -.. :ss^e^gg^isaoss`•� « ^sa:=` - ici �9s�€i�:�$i�•a=�:��a€.ip��iai§'�:i��5�'�ai�$�E --A: .88•R' e r88R`"888' 8:8R' 'ta «SRo.088:'988:' i; e',627 c€si'ie'I s:e��aaae-asp' �ssc^aa�. ^z�'dtiai j-saes':ss:' 14-,; �ss�•' 7 7assae^_sss $eO_ e « ggrys: i; 13g:a:88 :i�,�E�e:" -^^ 88r' 8::� a •'88'=' ^ fo r it;j'�';p^'mayy e�9�iHliti�is�f�ac',>�>i�aa��i Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers APPENDIX D-1 Traffix Intersection Data Worksheets EXISTING + APPROVED + PROJECT W/ CAMPISI EXTENSION AM PEAK HOUR : o .o .. .... ggL �j" _ = .. o e 00 82: - ; -0000000000000 'a�>�$�§� a ti ;FiR �88�e�88r 8888: a !: in: e_ - Oe-as•--ss-`• ;osR? ��•�'��' i � �• ��' - axes"-:ss:i $eaRi - _ -say_? e iai3E _I.Tseexas:e:sa:; $se.' A•r sITs-�'e� - - �g88geg88g-8w:-i it-sa-ni s:BRi - e-- ;F;t --- r88_en88 808Ri e « 88 - 1 - •88� `o `A r-_. $^^ea:sa:e:ss-i 8281 y<• - e 8: eeesseeessoi a,?sa;$o = -= zgeeeeggeeeese= $e8R1 s 98 Qsa-- ��--; $ s3 = e-- $ �� eas- ass ;a•as-- a F: 'e,tx--� R a EZ 1 :Y' Oomrl in'! a" ggoo' ...... o..000000000000t in'!o so cts B6! Yo .._.._ s`t'g - o;00000s000 s:s1 =8soe .. oa .... o .... _ "ego_ o. _ Q$oo ....�ssi��'��i>a•sf?..�,,d ��C�JIaF�W; >��>;�aad��'s §j �\ ); §§ k�| |E| ■|' § |� ;---- „ ... m;°I „;°f e :;f t„!°! }\j�\!\\\� 0i 101 of Mir: .W.-M-8 _: _; _T1 !!P : ;§; :!§:°! !l=:;-=:■.,,.� , \{»\S4\ i , \ ��©'/aga! { /glj\{gUiII .l y! Saint t ' .— 5R�l�A2/2°! j§ yr/?AEl: �!■$��;�;��«;l.l�+t: If Q .,! ^: -- -. .�.E; : WIN ! �:■p�. : �: !■: !�a!! �� . .. .� , .;:.: �. �! ■��_ ! m 1Sul, 11.7 2 . .� e�� r� ee� are a. eee 1v : - . 5 §:w�i141-: _'�2q§ : : - -- � -. _ .�� : �.;�! _ ;- : .. ��°: e �§� :!!�°! °,§°: e¥§ . . � .., . /° �� ! �§ h§ b \� j d�/}� 2- \ a; / 6 /{ 2■� ! \-uluiW h9/q /\ \1lull { .Z ��I ■§;°_r!#:°®§!�{ !!|!} - )|', | 2e\ 4§!|-{ � - ` � ;°°!§m■°�;\!) �{§ri § ;m! �!!�-! ; /!a//G ..��,��.��. ©�/e/2\E2{2\9/ 4�! - £gze::,e: si/e�#aeel9:9" . //�/ 2� @� \ ■ §;■|`.��(!��`°2 `®"°`_■!_°:!§:\ §!■!{ f ;!{ ;!!;`� ! \_°_/\; :■S;-: ; ■g 2:;! ! �. .: /�//a|tij |: ,.. ,a' ah§e\/j:��waEe%■w:; 5®5��sz�aaz �ti' ƒ ;}\gw#j2�wx/��r/£�\/\Sga■. e\\2 // ;8; !§_°_!■_{ §(k!{ k!`}� ;!!;�} .�. ■��- :;�� ;�,; _ . -_ _ - - l2 \;||�§�: • -- |. ' ■ .: .. . ...; , o-1 ./.,..��.�.�§.� |'§�� ! � §�■| .:!';i �;�|2| _ . �_ .. _ ' : : � _ �;l: ' ( i ,■■..! � � ..��,,,!°■■!-� §!§�; | :!� $�-! |,G�w �' %/ /2� #' @ \ ��=: ■� , §� !\�_! � |! � j� : .. -- .|.-i C;-��°.�,,|�.-!,: ��■�f.;s��; 1�....§ ^§�a:�l.-! /21�\6\\L■2.\!} { , /!9¥/tQ/dngn6wh�hvpa�. Linscotl, Law & Greenspan, Engineers APPENDIX D-2 Traffix Intersection Data Worksheets EXISTING + APPROVED + PROJECT W/ CAMPISI EXTENSION PM PEAK HOUR §/... ,R,l�-e;l� a!!, ,«��!■: : � 1;.� \_!\ �. ■.:l; - ;��;- ~ . .. .. _ �� !!.,,;2RMHE�&J � �:: _ :! -lily! l ENE id :91: !! !.®!:E|�ft��,|!\] ■!!\i;!#!);;/i:¥ ! �,-{. °°f n!n°°�s■n°=say! §�]§I ' :�:|';zl�-� ....��ss�°,■■_� §■,-� . ' -■`- � :c; s;al� !ln;� 2;■..! 5i �.., c;.,�. .... , #s®@\ 8.81;a18: j .■ s,, ,!■:. §�4_: .! , :|. .■■-., �. � . ■ : ; -; :- .; .. , ��■. , ��■ ! : /))f \; | ��| : - -.�! ". E�!°lE9s!°Else. }•,_. _ \;. �.a�=) !'■|`��!);) � )�'�� ; !§=�:2;;3�/;s/� §/;�� k!\�� |.|! ;!!||| B\\`°/sal.lss!\ ■■ . _'};{ -■,\_) . !, jt�§jf . . pw�ri 2c;r�! :!!!°!!!!.||!§§. }!1.c'; `) o:»#r.,sru,� �sn : 2 eJ J2: 4x 2 ! .2geg \\as. . 77 1 / §Q5a\j;a®R/§§� \ :zt§G/[�/g�-�%5tt G/922, i °°E■s=.; - I §■|;T ! . T 2■#2.! -... : !� ��'�-�!' ' °:I�!■-I�■■� §;_!� _::_� :��:.; §/;;. c; R6: � |) )»_ ! .\ °.} ;R;°°!■�!°!■�:{ §��!{ � ��f �,■,_! ■:8§:! ,: �■■._! . ,m;1w I: tL 8j:g \ /:/E) ®�{ ®® ®tea{ {{!2\@ate E, z:...�.. ,.i ., ; . .. : .� . . \ 1 2:,4 tZI-asr@a! .�jr,»�- !,■ ■ .- - ..-- -- - - ;ss;;! \ .! ! ■ \\�)/ //r®s®pp{ a7Z:"!a le- ea / �x,wpo&,�! s®ems%rr§/�jqr� |!|! o :| ;■ � : ;,..,■■,�,■■,� ■.■,�._ :_;.�■■,.: / )(�/\ / \��¥�� \�� /� \� �� !�■/ j � .)gq§�\�{d/�� n��■■§/��! S�siE�o m_... go = _ _ bSSpt�goSoj..o ...vom �...a...L Z;g u u&" - - o0- ;�$i��4�:8�'S�o i;o = �; —,Ny�9W > 91.,'sd�ai ass assa s:.gs s:- ^ss^^. !a8im isi saaie~'r _ �sase-88s _;sR =ss=« a i `i=: F• « - �88„- ME! 8088 J.:8J e' ' E8: 9 I "o a „''- C88G :88: 8088 i ^ "88•.«� W: E1 u'i� _ ' SF - 7Sa- `88.e.88R i 8a8O 1 ^S i ".88-•' -�;�: ��• t88teL88:' 8:88' ^.S� '88!": !8 '��:�:8n I'j�e^ - :88^e^88^'_8e88��o " "88^�• «S8e --X88X-X88X'18a8R' -• __« ^__^_`_otiI_7-4 . —4 .H.13HU :;Fi •ee_88�-:888 S 2 7P 8:85 : 8588: e.'X R 3I1_ i[: �:':.7•'1C a-' ae _:88-':88-' 80881 E -88- :88:-7ssui p8s a ^.:T -88--: aIK.�'L�: Gil��`�E�ee� � :,8E�e_88�� 88::' .. .,88�-• r98:e8882'S8:^ aa •�8E :84'R^ _ r88^^�88��8::" �L�88"«• {{/§#%wpwxgxa�gEeg� § ■ � j :°(e °�{ _�:°°:■�_°=��:I |�!2} | :|} :#■:-! |��|.-� .2.��:ss:�:ss:� ■- � �■■--� -:., °: -�- ■.:§� | :|� �� ! - )(') I s;§c; �! .. , |!;|: | "f■| ,�°' . ■ �� ■ � s.\/�2�R9��■ ■.: !2�■! �; . ., .. : ...:: � _�! :..: }�r�grg9\E�gfo,Po;�� !2! ` `• ~� -�� '�!!: _!!:; |!!!; ! J]� e!!�"| ■ c|: ! ■)|\;l-�22 =)_�-_■■�°:§s=� ■-■,: ;:._; �,■�-: ! ■!)�� ' � � � ;�,��,�},�,■■,\ ■■\\\ ��\/} �■■r,� | . . |B!!|\\B °-■;=::§..�,:|.��-! - . !.: . .. :99#8999889i /�§�r�■ §1.§| ){�j ~' ]\� \!\��®/ ^■� ©� \ 9!|j ( .,.t jt.�r �� { �\1-M §q§!l4atag as:zws/e%SHaa!' ��I =.,�.■s■,�,as,} |®|�} .| ),`�, , ... .......� . :�:!'�;l.'; ,��....,......■, ,: - ' t}` (!';2��°� _;:°�=s.§-e■■B, |;■�; ; -;; :■,e�� ,j,��/■s,�!§a!\ §/a�\ _ sc; \■■\ ; ■�; _;:I \� 2 ESg; 9.| Q; g\ \ }\}))l';r ,; S. ■:�■;■a�°: 8#- :!■-! o{r.o..2/\122//\tee\| ° \ p ql ! \�; -,■.,: ! §;■ ;■ ;�; .. _. |� .�!!!: ■1 ■■ . §� ,... 2.\@2./ E _{. . . . p . i . , ,� ��#!�|!_■; _.�.�°� �§��,�§,��■,�!■!.°��! �|�`°��°� � .1 jt p' #� 9 7 j - zq ! ■ 2 . ® z®/�.. g2 ©wwJ�!` � /a3\-�/��\ ; n�zw�/6\£ga�:` � | ■ f ! § ......... §§°� §5§°� ! :!i ir: � - : ; r : e¥§®; ` ./!)\//E« 22.ae.wa�ar®\ Mir E\} ; e\} M.": 2#..R'7e,wR.22\! ; �■,!■:/: . - �� ; ;lm��: : |;■| ' . !;§§ PIM :«- §E \\n2'Ta!%\�� « : c :- ,�! . �:`:_ :!l.' M 1 _-..=R"qn Mons 12 °" jng32 ' \ §: :! 0M , ;. � |22{ 1_a — -- ! : :!b/°\2~�2°5/\C/;y:«J«»!! i \ 2 _ .8 ® rl wNT /. an; � ; -. : �/§/§23////\;Inn! Q k \ 04 \{ {#/{/ / 2; 4 !! T! q2;j 2{ 2Sj /3 / G§! i si/2ae2.3}a f!\}ag\ It \!/ §%\ MANi \M ... . \ \ \: 2 /1//'//� , e eeegeR!lot ./&5 . , . , . �. .. , lot ,...;:..l;l,��- . .4; :_ ;'.; w,9®®9®.Sena»\me;°® k� '); | §b\j. J-&»\§�Rp /w! f \��G//\�g��{ E �)\HUEii1 x/w- a �; " IY-go"� SS8e:�88no88N' 8ery�' a '88'� ;' :88:e:88:' 8oaR' E•- X88X^� Z: _ oReOR88S'R88R; 8oe o ^ _ ^88N •' `o i,$7i€c'.iYe'i = 3sa:eass� s^as ^ss;� R_we_asaae�sss� o." ..:.:.. eR^88^e^88^' 8a88iYo '88�.,t 5; �. .. c R88R'R88'�� -8e' "8E"n• z ctv188n e' e._ v88w"' oit Egt RSR'^,88�'�88�' $08RI o - 4�992n:I -ssx- $ o.x88x- e xoROeR88R'R88Rfee�' ^8E- SiE !sg:88�:ist�e�' ReSeXR888e888x1"$ee=1 a R:' ^s8'•"� _ € $^S' :se�essa$ $e ?�1 re avid=.4 � a $?I zits ^'aRl;zp i>>.._Sig a 'R �� 1IJI�R�-.�J>uu`>°ISddt4d'. > Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers APPENDIX E-2 Traffix Intersection Data Worksheets EXISTING + APPROVED + PROJECT W/ TRANSIT-TDM PM PEAK HO' Ito , _ , m ,.,��_§■=°=$s=Z ,§95} § :�I `�#;'{ s. � ||�\ \\\��„#=�,s■,' �.\:. ; /�. j;At : /o-. §s■■; $!\\' 2ak`'\ | 3.39: 22\/}gig\\ .._oo,■��°^§fin. ■■!!. | 2!. E�#:~! 2 \ 9,;:.3q\ §){/\/J�R�\/}E2}|/\tgt, , .,! � ' .. .- � -. � �� SIR.- l.! \.' =§;`°a!\\°§ss §§§_\ .:-o. �as� &} \! � \. _ / ! . ��lss,°=$_�!. ;!. |, -- �;■ �!`!'; �!�';;'�...l�..,.l, , �.|�;;v �, .;, ,=sg■ _l�:;-I;-=' ■■ ,: : .;� .�,|;:&;;|a:=5 | : |:�! . - ......_;|gs_8 /\\R� m :s 3 @g§ »;"o,o ~..� w�\:.\/;..s Ugea\j \2\�»Q«2a§£6�s@�t:; Zi �� - . ■�-.,-�;�;1.;.,.��- � - .-.0 WHO. / g a Q §a E � { ;�■.�;Sl;i ■g|®} !|} A��2`) '3g2:= ��!■s;°;ss=} ■/■!\ § ;!} ;��;�{ ; 2� \a q@/ gas. \ } \ :;;|.|38.1 |!�`. |!:|{ ��`� | §§ci ■|s■} | oci :■�:°! ' \\\.��s■,.,■s,. ■■,j; |:�§.■«^;) | °_!■■/°§ss,; it |�j§{ \9k\�� . . . _ . . , . z c� . w 3 2 ■ ®w- zf ƒ ,�{//�\��/�■�a��h�t�a�� 901 � //\;//� §.1. 191 !j _ � \/\ �\\W:1 `� `im 11 H u!!!{°KIN � !®I°=!�\!°!}\_� \ 2 2 @ G:M .:, a. 2 ; w wm x;,! ,■�:_: . l�i;� °�; ,;,��::,��aa�� _;:�� ;;:,: .�; . \;§�{ \/\0\\\ /ems/�///� :1Ans Y WN15 151 ®/®J �w ae�a baekspe . _ §ante \\\§j\@/\/§� ./R\»\2w29&{/73\ .\24g5#£d\/ga#G2gq/2/2glt �s -" . ...:l�. : : .§_ �. c a.. :..ate& ::#/\\\j/2w/\/////2.w■ --2882°988e; HAS: n 8;22: ° . .88'•:: "88^• -- _ ..... .._ Bog' a ^88y.: 8" :�=L��•�Y8° - «88« «88'� 8y88! .- pas: '881 ^•sa':=: fie? ° :U-°"v;SS!a ryaofl ? =ss: ;� a rys -ss- :a: - :aa:°:ss=;..saas�a ..^as^• R o_ :R: :aF X88X'X88X'�8:8R; IE�88'•�: Oz _c�98 aai a�- .ass 8ao:- ° ^ - ry8s2: ', iY° 388'°'88X 89^^SI ry88R' 8it- e-;x c;: 1PBg��I e asae°:ssai $ss$1 >ax: sass°=ss:: I'M : _ _ _ s `=f:F< _ - 84883°Sg83 808R o noon': ��;E�-88�r a Eisai�' ii'8 - -seas=sass sae'' a a38A°a89a 80:- - -ss— sass°ssssi..8se•i�vi� 1. !•;asp-` - ia:css-s: a HIA ;s"aa Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers APPENDIX F-1 Traffix Intersection Data Worksheets EXISTING + APPROVED + PROJECT W/ CAMPISI EXT. & TRANSIT-TDM AM PEAK HOUR / FEE AN v i2!{/w�a�;,��#.ye� �!■: !!��l�� /; °§° �§l:�:§\:� O W ! , , \/§!AIR! /®© an logs- !a j\�......! .: � / ..\/f\5H1HAHM2\&EHIM //£AXIOM \ InI y; aa= ma, a©;§ a 9S§ � : IZ; §:z:�; «�Se5R�R9TeRi�xferw �� :\; ::/Ga g:2 .. . . .,. nn E::e:£'4 arvG®Jy�G/222�%// /!!9g d d 9`� w= 63; G2; 2 2; aw Hr|�: .I : /)!/{/\/\ a ® ® ©Rall ®01101 2g\ and d /)§,j�\�\ //\ Q!(!'® ®eRa92251a91l2{2ea # \ §A S Ili|f %=\2;�;2J//;!° ,{ IT _`:_ !®}\�.}\'| Sp ! .� ag@S.£R252/! )\\\-\71 ; §/\A ~ °©�/Ja\p\§lag:Ia : //)H'WhiJ '=2a{i#9§ /l2w�%&£��\��&Ea@z#Ap��R: :G�` °�T =;_°°_■�:°:�l=l ■�!!i ■ :■} :�l:-! |�;|!, .�:■a=°�s■:; §s=.' ■:- � )|'�# .-� :\=�°;ss=°�s)=� s;a■� |l�=� 2�■2`) � E§!°,§s■■-Ass=} pss: 8125: /\'=/j� ;i... 3,.; §!■oo; f \@; /! T. /\\r�s��\:/\/S ., �) :3|!!|/�|!� .■■�-,■■_' m v m !Xi i■■\g( | !!| ! - ..■ ~� _!; l;��. -��.; -=:e; : ��, _��_-; 2!!.! A.;- ,° =�="=a■='=■s�; s|■,: !!,@; 2aa--: ! ■|!�� ') �\ �'{ ;;,�.,sa,�.s§,} �_!/�\ |`��{ :/\::) ! § .�'£]r 39;qq§s%g�wj.:j2&\\ &e/29.991 c; Zi _ � �J!a;e =#/./w/\|/\/\/■/\} 2 £ § c § / h §|�/� ) B. Q{!# /w j;taa/ehGEezw&>s■�� .I ;,�°,x,=�,■■-! !§|:! | :`i //is /."// |� ( . ;-• '; |�| -5..; §..§; _:._; ....; _.._ : : ` )!';!'� :;:��=■s;°§§s§: Sass: b c; �ss� n�} ;..; . °£■�_°!■�_; !l��. �_: -■■-a: ; !!§� ),'{ ° E§E .., ...; ..:; ■�; ,��_ ; g292//9�g9;|s,�g\\ � ,°: ��.��;,��§,�� §�s�, ■!�#� ��$�°: ! *,7 ■�,��§§�.�|,°} e!s■} « :|} :■�: ��|:��.:j_�■; ■ � "Al � §\s\ ....: , | ■. . :|„ ■ °.; E�§'�■#■■°§$s■, ||§■1 n;�r1 2■,�;: 8: ■ : , .. .: :.�: ■!■) . ! ! - : _ _ . � �.■| %�!;! , : �.{ .;.,..�s:°=§§:. ■6,4Z !lAc; p� ; � � !; , ■` @2l®98�9\/§2Z/\!, . m, . . . m'\\ k. :1: V!! ;. ;.;l..,■ ■,.-:.,.� ,{@wgh\gaga:{9J{' �§ S'2it //////�//�//}//\ f �§j PA 1999 S. BASCOM AVE. S 97-20/UP 97-11 4 OF 6 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLAN. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCS. 12/99 .I27 ,-_�:�,�_; °=rI ■■,=f . ,,■.:! ,' :■)|';_.� . ./,�.,� ,,,,,,' \. �.� .��..! ._®c!� �_�� |!:!; :!■|; ��_:! . )|'.� ./§�,);)!°!!■,; ||�§1 | .6o. .} �.( .,�,,;/.°,■■■} ■c; : vc; .■■.-! ; ��«/2 vc; 2 /\ 2 \ � ._, \\t lc S2gRCeg;Eg.|.25� . l 2Rg�g.e.grm. .�_ ■��, ! ! �\ § 2;sa/| - - - . �.»|;.§.b:: §� z . \!3r: j;i _1II a g� ; ,�T =;�°:e■■e°=!!e! !•§=i z c!z :� :`)|��!!�-� .� �;\§_°_\\■; !\§\� \!:\' �� /) ).\5\]rc; /q /�\2//\ A\2p:s�:9::T ._ a \§ !!r! 2 si 9� a#r9Ri 9! »!��ci: Is . ^c;; ,._;_ ! .( ■ , ;c;* °!■s•! 5 `■■�:! ' . ® {E j\\2��jt� c; �xg�a,wa.2! «`�J!|-g.S: \ ƒ , 3�§\/aggj\�/h\/gaR! Linscott, Lae & Greenspan, Engineers APPENDIX F-2 "fraffix Intersection Data Worksheets EXISTING + APPROVED + PROJECT W/ CAMPISI EXT. & TRANSIT-TDM PM PEAK HOUR -- - - - - - -- - - - 9 9 n gas--0 e axssxeOasei spa a os M co IB ^ "„ y �H: ee - e ' ry88ry8 3 _.._ _88_San.: lyy1 8ft „it: : 't _-=88_°=g8=' 8088' e.- rgg�~ F AN: :� 3i�e - r88:°:88r'•8S��I�o - ••88-~• - O �ry i$i iczr!>�r M.U. i - i sa - z sae ao osse sso as ss^s: %-om 8o8R- a Zvi c; _assry°ryas^' s ;5�. :>aas~ °eessoeoase! $osei�sse°? sik sxaiP` a :seeee88-88e= $og;- o 08 °ages: 3 ies cs9;s'°o_' ry sssPe9gg�i ss:pi ^ss_c aaE a: :sMi$ -_- ---- ---- 3g - X888"„88« 8088 8 -88-^t eN � ..e a R_:St�' ae e88'°°88°' 8:8° {j8 '8 88oO: :a IJC 7885 7887 pas Ia�8a! a E /////} !! !;! !!;■ °-� E!r°�!!§-°!§:r; l:::; ; §:� w::w-; re�.Zvi ie»® j \ isn \ . EllIt: \// �� GJ�d/.\/;2y\ \§/{! KS : _my T.P 1 WE _ , .. _ --.. \{§IW s.gssg eQ5 Jg[l9;2S\ :!£Jv\ /R9/R9gj2/�2C2G2J: .\ t., \ W!7§#jb{ 9AHIMi £malsw 1\/£ggQ: //......... � /\ �; \.�ji~.»^~2~5/.//�g241Z %.£2,./� 15it!NP:/ g:-.279871.: »;e�l62;r2�2wan �. w.,.£: §.!.§| !`.! ® ,:,;§�,�i!°' -! ' . .. . .- {/ //\-V . .� - \\.;J;;.:;:�;: e :lb / ° \2«�-- ---- a:yeas»§! { \)/j k a£a« as\®r§\ 99� \\\{Hum. / J)/\\\ /�/////1/o-1 90 E2.22.J2/ SMIAS A 9®©o—o-- e�:s.aed §' } Aj! Alf a Gwl9§ / \ . M ƒ�\);�B)) ,,{ \ § \)/q \ /� , !;§i I a\�/\/r\ ,. oin ! � :r�l=:o.o1 : l) /: i /c\\/\/ \ ih22E\d\-Jr / ..\//&/d£d\\\e\g£g»l1RAN1il/ 2 y{\ }! / ; no: Me ®.��.«;w�:= e« �®;��w -_,� \ \1024T! ®°~ j ;.!! !_ . , �� 2. / \ /g \§!A§ �Q \ . RED Ely at1ma nan. .... TO" ;;■! !■!_: . { E& /////\//!/�J22 �.:- : ■:w'�!.®,.: \ of _ /�//\\ SJ«UI z m- � §h§-� •§J»\wp6dj/2\p/22`� /{tiaiv 88ry= � "88iO^� S88S'S88S' .: '• 1,��0 �88 «88 8088'; 8=" 11'�� 18 '• y 1,, _ __ �88;,' 8oSr' o•� - �gg�"; i! �? 1 �� • � Y�o � _� :ss:1' saves � ..o _ ..�ss^=' - 1 _`�,. - . -••ryele ..z.. �>.._:.''fi�i �`;�e•��io>�`z sss:gas - - �88wry gap Eggs i Yb'� 88�.: 1� .0:V :88 '�88�- 808^- �!_g io6 = = assx•8s8�' 8a�� n � gi •`� `€.a1'ii�ze;ee��.iaa�ssi3> sg;saa Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers APPENDIX G-1 Traffix Intersection Data Worksheets EXISTING + APPROVED + COMBINED PROJECT AM PEAL{ HOUR a om /;�! ■:.: . , E/ }\\///---- //:/f§/\2.! � ../2§22\tw»\/a/g2g3E/2£gaQ: :\5°15!!5°5§§5; 8 0- �., �... ■: :: ' ® 22 m=xe: 222§ �§ /5�l�R&~�5552J52�E2\5/�2/2 i :~ 66/!/ 2§32=gs/®s�§®§\§ 9e..... { �{2 c . xae»�e:Jgwamn � , .\dA&!M3a 2"gw5&Sba£ d25aWA: 7 w! e�� R� ! . . . ��)|/��¥��; _§:�,_;,:°_�■:; „_;; ; :,; �■■:-! � .» ,§§,�_;,_; ;:■,; ;::,� �!§�': :-c; _- ! .Z ° 7 .....l�l�lm:!! |: - : ■! �� - -� _. ; .._; �.,,; :_.: : /ee9egp�r9;m2.2g_j §; \{))§)\\&5:.°�. .. _. . . . .... ,;,°°,■■;�„;;i §!:_{ : `�f "§§:_. : .c; ._.m |�_� .■'�;! :)�'��°°� �;_��,��'�;§_� I|s,, !l�,� 2!!2-: .\ .�} _\,..,■■,°,\;,\ ° !■\/\ � :"f\ o-;-;, ��! � S2©.�RE--, 2 -71 \)\\ w \ / �:\� b j#.f £■ K � w� i., 2, ; T � ®_;:°�!!§_°_§_§_} !■!�f � " } :�l:�! r� : � ,! 2� `�- --`�` j�� ..,� 2.�.� -■■-_{ ; !: !;! | .Z, �.I .;;°�E§!E°�§§=� ■|!�� § ;!� ;!!;`( � ��»\z>•p \J55E2/;E9;§s��g\� � g .q@w 3 2 o -. ■:�.,:|';■to\°. C. ;■s;°:!■:. §s§5. :'.■■�;! ■ 1\ |�■9'i} !|:|) ■;■ : .—.2■w :88,; ■„ .! 1 .:S : .: . # Xc; po£!§ :| .�!!�!■:;!|�.l.�;��ol,..,§, :■�,�. '°■' ■■\ § |«%2- 899-: a .: �•::-�! - ' - :.h©.� k: ............... !°° ; °;; ;} \\} :\\:"{ }/j// /////\// //�zs- 1gll/§ it. ; 9 bR: zg ® �; \.�,-: e » i�� want!: �„��: min m.:: . ~ n taa ;I!■{::��,t�i .39A HI! \ 2 / : . , . ea/�2rGaGzz�B.�w ! 0 s/j / /\all \ � .;;- -� 'e§" Ruez d!{ Eealive : lAt9@\{// 113 HE/E#9@! dTalA y//�//'/y'ae� ::f��t��.: � Sh, }1992C2.-- : '9! `�` .. ///{:!�! 1 ` W. T"T1 99�§n\2 i; � `°� . �! | a�\ a��q�92�ae�;99aee Win: 2, 2 ; w w : s:;! /1 a /\ §Ij�2|eeRRe2«;bq.;G;: \°/\\�{/ s}/®©/®9/}2«{/S}22/ %......~ ° \2/ /©//§°§ .. /G//\ay\ ~� ©°�` RC;vv a g . : !\�/%.�;§\�/p)2e�2 £R! 5&!qz @w2 ® | 4»�qa! th». :11Rip Hi11131 M% Bass' a ^$g^w .881:: `^ 2lit'-w- �6ReY'X88X'�88X1 �08R1 a ^o $X881 2 e.Rt s: 58s8:sss: s:s�i -ai-as--'s LsS7 see - asasesss:' sesai Mi 1�1." aAsa �i �� ; - ; _ •sass•ssss! sesR a ws Z.;42 .i ga:- e -::^ ^8883-3883 a8:8x' w ;E�88'•8' TZ HiHiii Linsco", Law & Greenspan, Engineers APPENDIX G-2 Traffix Intersection Data Worksheets EXISTING + APPROVED + COMBINED PROJECT PM PEAK HOUR �a , - _ ,.,,_!■�°�4■=I !§!§} a :!} ;'!;{ !! _ : f ;;;°;,■�} ;¥!!} §::m} ;!§:"! !: !:is. -. .. ; ---. .i : ` /!{CM j•m S` - (2/\ V \{ k;| ;_!; • - : }®\e§=} 89--: §;■! ,_ :_; , � ,� ° . .. ._ _ . _ _ , �: ! l,� • 88 t!,{w5�\ix2=Ra«es/�©�H�j6a\ . g 7-1 A ^ Jh§w\!A/w/`w/eE@D�9«■R: }\ /W 38! San 1 -01 .�M. 000000ggoo.SSo BaSol `8 og�oo; Ki ggG j 0mu 1 E2'<S:gs'Io oil ......0 0 1pY ;SY'a� o - 5�. '. moo �.. o Ioe�oo 'Io.:.:oo: VIA xdn$?�iaa3ci>cs>isaB.sa: �� .-,_; - �_!,:°:¥§2, ,;._; _ �_, !■s�;: �|■: ;�!!�.-;;; .; :,:°.lie;°§;l;; �e.=, ::�:� w®`�{ !;■l�.;|:: . . �..�,; „_°_■�_; !�■,; ! �,{ ,■,,.! | _)■�.) 21�,;„ . 2-,a..-:.,;■■�.: / a§w»j \d2: di i �� {,-! °°® ��°."_®!�°=■■:{ §■@�i R :�f :��:_! !� .-. � -, :. °_§§!°!■!!� !;�|� § ;!� �sa�a! � !! !;� {,.; . �`!!!y°5s „ I !;,■T 2 } :■■;_: �� :�.�;.-,;! .; ��°°!§_§!°E•!!� !;■■� _ ,■� :■.�:! i ■: ::_�:l .. �;-�_-� -:�|; c; ��| '!\� !!!�� '{ _ -/ :■!!°!§�!} |!®`\ f \�\ 2s■2-) | :Q;/\� „ � .|j;�. .■_ - � §;| �'�!! ! ., �; ,�, .s..-°=ale. §��l� :::�� "#■�-: ■ §.■.`. !!�` ` \.k�° _\_°__��_°_�■_. sa;2; j Ix ■ �,�; _ - .: :; . ..�-_: � _�, �..� |;| . |{ \ } f � ,;,�■:,5:°=�■-I � ■ ¥, � �;�:,\=(�j;�_�_�_;=°-=ss=°=■._�:■;:_�-...'�l,�_' . c; /:.|�_;� { ^ ��Q@.\■=66 E�;'J|;-3.s:� /��/E � {{ /t�}&ta2�a� n/a■z a�z�ad:� Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers APPENDIX H-1 Traffix Intersection Data Worksheets EXISTING + APPROVED + COMBINED PROJECT W/ CAMPISI EXTENSION AM PEAK HOUR �§ PI �§ \}\�°-\\�� \\\�� \ �\� 9!(//\j/k ee92eR9;22�]/�2J\ : � ., ; 99891: � ��; : : : �.{ !;,°::�l=�;:;,1 ;;;-Z ;:e;{ :B■:.| l. ._ �� |! 1;9 : / ///�/j a >� " ■a . lwtg\//k/ E9Qp Hgb/R�a;2\{)#k§ !§§°e!¥!•°•!!�� !!■°`:§§u°a§§�; ){ :) ),`l. °-{ B!!°=!!!!°§§;!{ §!--{ ¥::§{ ^■�:-� e- 2992 ..- -..�. ■§■!� ! :§� :■!:�) eL j{ \Q{/�\/,&-�Q®Qs,3/.■.3sH ~�■ ��{., �;�, ,-•!' I !,'� ° '°�'!!'°'!!'� !!}"� | I/. �!!:`) {/\2./e/\23/}&/}�/}\G\ ,.\/§#JQ3>a. Q zw23Znn w6d: � - °°!■;I�: „:1 §•:Zf = :-I :S■:=! �■■l!_! ( ` )|,_^�°� !}/��:�"' �� .� �:■�, �_:! : �,■;��;;E; §E;x; ; :_; �■.:-: 7 ;!!;.: - ' �� :!'��|�`� ,,■- -■~-� , ��}�$:; )�:/�.-,;� .; !�(°�§..§°�.�§� !■■|; ! ;§� ;!!;"( \{ \§/®&®&/;5/; 'a.; pm . .� . .■■. nos§� §■•!� �::r; e■■:=: ■ .|��( ! )�';; °-; :�_°�_;;:�_�§_� -a-. � �;. .��,.: �;■| ��i|! � �� |!'I. !�;|� ;_;;�( ��| ��;};) , ( 1. �.I ,;,��,■■}°=■sj} ■�{ -:�-I :■■:.! I T /)tea\ - §w�! . ! . - ' �§! - ;}a.:.: /�\`&§��\q��{ /gaY) ()0§!\ !! ; _ _ „°„;,I loll! ! Q 222r! -r-m /!ap\ :g§t. . 2l M M : °I pl—:p #} a/}= /} mr2 tor; \\\ -//�//''_z; ,!! ! ; :� :. : _., ,.;A ;;.,; !;�l� � .i °�1 =�� /|l:)�/, . |:�:- ' Eli «2k'°\%JJ2»52j9b,w&z/2=! \ sg\!ja©9wbR/\J2a;"mint 'A@° a;" mint \\/s a\% !� . e:I./©. &ram #®Jy!1 e1 w /� S. :;�■! Pro . .. .. _ .�.__ �., _ S. { 2 \! R1! , %��%252«6/p9;5/;2g\ 2 §/!(`Rzgs,armimmy22,2 '52\ .©m°� mr//t }/e}!/{22\ wu \s \ ®° ! / tee.{:&!&§@ eJR922sr#;- '§%© ®^�/}//j {�Ey yv! Ja2 1 = .w® a�\1.§l;.j.&: w;2 -!■l e\§e°{ % . . a#—a2:rC,8�.�, " in it it . � .------ «/!: ))7;|�\._�(\ 2\\2�! / §lr:l..! Z.§ |:/§ §�°§`�;■!:! : !!\;! °� .�°!•!§#°!§¥■� !!!`� `!2`' 2l2;`� � �; a e9 s&s / )g\■dwS;,Q22wbRd\Q/6R2a/;:! \5�.0 () � ,.§9§H@a£gx\x��r2ag£%Saag: :■\|��! -1 . .- .. � ..� ; � ;�� ..� : -�_�°.| l�=�=§ss;�;■■§; 27;e| ::|�; �s��:! (a ) ° §9!°-§sa■.f ®¥■!} : |!\ i��r/� s.; .;. :-a : , .; !9` ,■�■ _�§§� !�§_; Pl:�; �■■,:! | ©SS: 2{ @g@ ..=s■§°:,■,; !;,l� ,',_; ■■�_! � -:,. . -.. �_w�, a 2c; °`� _;_�-,,,_°_,■_� !}._� ; e,� ^■a�-! � .:. , ! .; -.I :j=°�=■■=�=■s={ !;■aZ ;:{ -889.: r/} _\g/ A. \� §§� . xa2 ,eGwJla � . ./ gH 9WASAIVE ■d/ aIM� �l9;9*!vs:*:a7sggT:27-y§ JEj\ -.| ■:# °x!!^ •!!_; |!!§; 2 ;!. ;��;': �is;z |!:!. . : ,:;, : AM ||�!{ ` ��! �s■�.| ar�s;s'`�'\// �))�/) .~�, .� §�|wa5 !■! .0-2.°'!!•; | :t; i•■i-, r�a�9a}P7{2 {@61 /\ 292,1499 ..: ! '`'�!!4� jg3-�:l"A:ard .;.... a■99 �a|§; ! :|| ;g;:..! ■!!|) ; ( e °� - .. .. ! . _ ;._� : e!!■! .. °.3 .;l.�.■■--!!{ |!|�{ | SIT ay �l. „=.■,s■..,■■,.� ,._ )!!;�) !!� .■i ■ '2. ■!;-`!as|-!aa■. ■�:-:!: -AA i9a::! t 1 7- ® 2_3_w ' 2 2 H!� 2 � � : //�/�\a� 9{9+ j ANI-An Q�m ��§iHU /sad! Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers APPENDIX H-2 Traffix Intersection Data Worksheets EXISTING + APPROVED + COMBINED PROJECT W/ CAMPISI EXTENSION PM PEAK HOUR \)gall .1 �.■: !:i>! , .�. § \{ / \! / d .. \«: :w!!!|,;)!`�; °2 All i � ��. °§°°°°¥¥°°°;, ;_; ! ;l�:§! , :■':» ®°; �;��,�e;��;;®; e;,�: a �� ::��: ;-:\: _ : /§§%\: .'.; „;°n;e,EI M1 1 :!; j\§y ~ \\\w ■@&\j2\wb\/\\{\@f 5\`{ !J%§\\ g@QG£aa£#Gp�/{�U/(g �, a»a...... „ { {!�-{sail .1 .... . . . . ! V ! �� ;■ ,:�In°:2J:; §§2(; � _.; w:l�`: \k�\�� \\j»2 9259RR5;Eli!1 //\} \!;�{�/2\/;�/}�/\� {)\\/■~��e ^ � C H _.,�� , uA 050 � §�I.!!{-\■®�!!\j\: \\\\: `' ■ : ! _.,_; 0 l;;| ;!■!!! - �/� eB;gin: ! § \ \/ /� /� //` 2lni ! •�§■ }:!i,-1 "' �. .. :§l::: . wd;/ `'all.1 39e6a;E2»;2\��!§ §! /./ 7.w2,.:. |�»■ a , G)]/RgEJ! ■ MOM! #WM[J&£w\"e"Ahq;1110:3 .1 pass=�ss�T ss - " go6S88R'�88_ 88R as °5 �xsaxeOssei ass s'og ^ogoo '' a ?fie; 'Raa s~ a ---ss^=axs- s:s=' - R;� g;= e _ :Ivi F; ° - _ sass=�BSR; "s - x:: • i'IC 88Se.88S1 $a8R;•8:- (Foss a! $ ?«-: ,>i?f.e«is`ip@:ias€ : e•Re! !e! «: �'��•' :•:3�,r - "::,. s.:�", ses�' a �o' "ga"=� '9FB sgi; o;e.,.88...88.,p8oo 2R:via: �;8.08= -' �, a c�� •�:�•�� - e =- a `880-: AgS E , :�: g u� : �,'e - �88fi'�88fi �8RS I 'S � '"•8 if:o, - M �_ - ;88^-�88^' �: - `R ^88^.S• iM e ry88'eN88: .e.88..e88eg..e88- x:: - - - IM os !tom .. .. f 8 .................. I f: e ✓gg �' - - a - o.So- �A2:ion IS i 8: Cgs M o a.o 8 ........... .. 00n = o = agSo .20 .2 Ib`o.. �Lm jai=�i. •..�>�.>x.��>t��.i�,�3..� �':;Y'..� cT3}aS� .. �;.! : �. .� .�� .. : :�.�, ; ; :: I, 5 -. �. �. 2�~2..5/;2/�§3�52-: e: —4. !§!�! ; -�, ®l;,�l,§§•°•n§=; ,;„ � _:�;� �e;:;: )\��(\ (\\�� )'�\' c! |§ -- : �� ;; §,�,�� .81i @w! 5 :w@R© w.wGa/Jmwxa2®ram /1l//�lo1.81 /// ;•!�E��E ! #! ... §§! ;.§°I 2 Io ;§#: ! : �,� ,.., \/{\�j / ^2�e2;E9;:e�«52 /©J/®2\ ae;l2'S2\ .■■:�: :■ ;! °°� _;=®,:,a;°;;:;; :�§_; �:;r� :§!::! |■%§6:)\ \}//\//.~�8 —Rm 5/:�3(2es �■ ,ill;:;-=:■ .1��°; �\��\\��\,��;�;��;- , . 2� ^ � /�`; |j/)|\ \)::®... : 2 2 j2;,6 I .i®—� |j99gw�6aRa» 9ta&�: \�/* ; .I ° � _;:°_;■■;��■„ T ;;::I = �=T ..■;�: ~ :�}|��; .\.�,\„\�\■\\; §/,.� \ �\� ass;;� � -.- ` \ 9;�; �:�; �:_':!'�= °°� �;_°.■!�-°!§„ � „a,; _:_� �ss�:! ! :lag; \��—|\�/a2�ee�aRR9�g9�n2�92e| §�` �':::: }!'�� °K� !;!°:§!■�°=s§=� !!!!� §�2-� 27s2�: ! ��| �!i)i) : � ` - „_\{§�§//wf §;■\f ; \�I -■#,-) � \I / |l.- °--s:'�-#!',.,..■, ' ■■--: ; .I ��1 �;�°._!■_°:!§_} !s§�i : �;i :��:�! \(�°E.. . ....' ... � )) };" .} ..\ !/7°.fig■�°!!■_/ |!!!\ !!2!} `"`�| ; \:1— §if; |)i|)!\;� ° !!!°:_§�.°!§�\{ pg§-: .- !| ��: :�l�)|'�■!�'� /\}�.\,.\�.a.\. 1,==� _::�; �■■�-( | •�| |,�!!,! � !l��=� I� -:, �:__::_:-� ._�_; �:_�; �;;n : � `� ■: , :! .I =7�°=:!!=°=ls=� |�n�. § �r{ �a&r | !�■ :,�! |;■ .�1:! �) �f �.};;°,:■._°:!■:} ss�®! °-;!■=°=sl=!||\2 :12 , ■: .. . . ., ; �:■: : ||��■ °2� !§;°"!!■I°Iss2�!|:'_:�il;��;�� a �� . Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers APPENDIX I-1 Traffix Intersection Data Worksheets EXISTING + APPROVED + COMBINED PROJECT W/ TRANSIT-TDM AM PEAK HOUR : _ p. .��J.B 69oa1 �000008g00088.: o000 - ;boo iCr >�s>isaadM: - , � ,-�-_■■_.=,■=T ■,==T . ,.I �■■;-! Ti|l��. /�/��:s«=�:■■:;■_.' '|� 2��2,) |� ) .-;_� �; .R- .� � _;�•� | 2�� k ! - . ||/! --� ,:;�-,kk,-■sa,; ■��§; ®l:=� �■■�-! | ' !| � | �: °! . -. -- :..-._ �. �! ■�;, ! � |! )§�) -; °-� §§!'_!�«�°!■��{ §��l7 �'2�t ;��;�) � l�� . .. ..,..,. , .. 9;8�z � szss\.\/ / \/, l� ,2.�..RS..9..1, |�§§. ! ■■ . :..; ;|i P;�;„') ■ ■�(sg;::�_. �■;..! ! , ,��, ! . ..:� § : _ | §! , ..��,■.,�,as,; !�"". • �! :_: :as:,! _! • •• • • • �; ® : � �IT // � 5l15 T.f .. . -� cl !@�NeGa )2�QwG\/§j§R»SAES:§ ){ // j\ \ I .:I ; {A /) � � a JJ©��q®p9iE�»lSlatE |; ; f| |;$ | .{,!°\\ E!E ... .. . .a:=. a ,a; ._:. • E/e®eRg;E9.®so.n , �. :; !: °`°■■■■°� ■�•°: •::s; :88:°! ! s\/... a... asiE\!®1I�Cg! ar• ® . . . . &. e_ : ■._ .■■� .■. : ■,._: . :-��_..��..�� _:\' �l;l� ;;�, � ■ - |�■|■;■!�. :I;! ° ' s\ees{s81o; red : o ;!�!';!:■: . ■ �..a . §s�.�ss :■§§ || :|_-.,-.! ; {\.)4 a' was-&&)&Q5.^)&/j� Q� " :� " 2 ! § ■ .�.w|;.§�y.. / \�\ ~ G j \ J2 Q. 3 £ J®■q j § � !:'.�!l��t��■.!; !§.!, ■■� ,�,.�� :! !;-,! ■ : | � . �■��■�i \� {� ! \®®R©9p;ay;2a.2/\ Il } ilk !: : ® / \ { ;jam! \ gg e2:�{ _. mmr__._m� }\ �/\\/ %~~2~2/;E/!§2;2/\ minUI »JA2.eseg©E®l11!11 ;aaw RA W! IUl"' \}\ ) } �.{ @ � e� 1111110110 _;_�:_::!°=:m=�.:�l;;�§ Ito! -�- , ME! {■\;� �\� �§�„�§\� �;� . � , ,gee; : );�\.\}\ !2\ �/1 MIN1HI1§\{)G ( � a«�a��£z^/�G@p�GR: - !� \( Mu ; \. \ .l4. !l��l�� . .. .. _ m _ N _ ;)!s ! , u ..eee; } } #£ ai=�i2gdi .)( 1H .,.;, °°: .. _; : _;_ ..: . `� £ � K �` � /e� / `I§ lltt . . .! ®: ; . �. §,;\!};}`� );\'§.�/� ; ,�e.�: ! §�:| �,■!�: , . :$ !§!°�N!§§�§!!a. !!!§. § 0 hi . . Ron; 901 gas,- , ! /§\/ /��/�\/\\\°~ :§ ._ : : !: .��o ,�§ ;l�2:!!: ! . 0 |=�a : - r a®9p S. 5522\= ��y�— .:� \11y1i 1 �1 ) \ |...�� / \\{ / / / R/� �' ©es#8-8888 8:8'. 22% 8;9,— q { - e I , a 7 / �a56ci\aq/w96%/aJa�»�gRw \ - - =i !!;i} - : \�i -■■�:! , �;;■ : ,ific RA s^ ® .- ■.|, l:: { } §a°E;§E; , \E 9. \ {\/ aw[�% ,,., &� Will% 52Qa:. '.w a�= Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers APPENDIX I-2 Traflix Intersection Data Worksheets EXISTING + APPROVED + COMBINED PROJECT W/ TRANSIT-TDM PM PEAK HOUR ■� 7 7merle#I=SI-!Srw !}\-- ....... .... /:.�. \■\\a( .. . „:.! §! :: ! ` f ;r°°!§§!°!■!!1 8292{ ; „ i 988 - �i�! )y��: -.-, -, <:E°�!§■!°§■m!� ■;;§� § ';; �ss�=! ,.°°,°„°°°,§°{ ■;■gi • °•! :■•:°! 9e99eRs:�,e2,a%� .. \ ---!`!°!■§!{ §;P!{ §!VC; /\// !.� .§0.0.88..88.1.8.9..|■'e.,-e■■�°: !z\ a�Q��a©gi�saE��2�rw -- /¥A #�\ // . !\/§■j&/a« aa� N/a / .W Ip /'2/'§®'J2/ � /E /R)\ //\!d 6}a«e2E59}2\}\/{/g/ 82z1891P. a § «:: ■!K >" 2 ©al . (./ ;){ . {�{� : -. T I O _ � � �!§: ° ' ;;=°.=ee�°�;l=; :§G§; :!!:®: �.l \ \ 2 «._ .� , } 20:�::;:a: \/a9g� �wAW"- eJ;9»Qp�/��w3� Eaz w�5 , ,.\gk#@aIa«/a��gEda>d6z#tea: //} we 1 ;.2 s}■ �2ee Eck;|,��(\!I!|.!|�-. \\\\^ .. 211 .Q, -0 o!loss! Bug! go! gasm ■§ ��!§! {�\)\§��!!° ,§. .tgg � ` * { ��`:P �! `B!S 2El& �» ;: ./,. \;!!::\) y: `!- :-}§ a / 5 \` ! Qap\|§2/Es»E�a■J, / 9�/Ub1H,A t;#/( £ , waI aga "gANICAH »: I!g'� €1gn a S " 8% .^^'o: oSBoo: t _ " "oo o " :9 � o ....... 3: o Ms:'—�Ggsas$ Eli I a'Z•8610 oo�BS�o "" R�o .. 0 of o eoi, >I a?? � ,aRYaWI >u�>?saadF : ,s ! .;.:;_■■;.!■�.. ■■,:_ .-T ■■ ! !!�!-�� ;;..■' -�-� .� �:~-� :,:�; ,... : | !! � � .. ■■, ,■#�, ■,■■. .::_; 2■■2-: }) | �22: !:■�! �: . .~ !!#; !�■;: ||�!; ! :_� :zz:=! /| �;. - ! " .. .. .\/.{ \aa\ \a {�i{ /}��/~� @r9©r■®/ $�� 22� 2«/\ !;§, ;!•!■� ' ' °-! lags{ ! :'{ lag'-) . %�qr:§q)�§:q/ � ■:.� . ■ !■s,.!■■!! ■.■� � � .�■■... )Fwn }2 /»b\ g1. Qia:d�U\i' | � ��3 e;a�.:■_■,�:■■:I |!«■f � �•f :!!:�! | :—Tim--.- --: , .: ,�_ �_��_ _«�_: !§■■' = ;|! :�«:_: ;;....-- . _ ■■..,■., ■,■!. �..., ■■. . | - _ _ _ � -'- -^.-_ .�. _ ,..�; ■��■ : |! );! { ' °-; ,�:�.,sl;�,ss:{ l;s,T =:r;{ 2■■:;{ : T §� .::Ct @;�\! , .®Re��■■\ Eg22;e a! : 26-;q `{®'`§#s#a}9}�/{�/\ ■�� . :�■!.�'�|!�'� �;_..��-: .�.., ..�, ._;; � ISM G;-:3a�ss:per:|��sg | '■|!|) z { �} , : " .. .� ! . ■ , �, „■.,=!![�EssEf |!|�{ J!;|{ `a■:"{ \Q |&�2: � _a��! {: q . 9;/|-2£5 . \�; � /- Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers APPENDIX 3-1 Traffix Intersection Data Worksheets EXISTING + APPROVED + COMBINED PROJECT W/ CAMPISI EXT. & TRANSIT-TDM AM PEAK HOUR � � °,T :;_��_„_°=!§:f ■�_:{ • :®f ��s^'! °2°�I��,�j� :;:��:§�:�:¥!:� ■s|;; ; :,; �s�:-� �^�.; � c; ;..;_. � � �!!■§°§■=§f !�■�f =:::� ^■■n-: ; � - � |: :�.:,�;. -� :�: .. ._ . .�._, �.,�, ■��, ; - ,- }/\9 So /\� 6 o ..` . ... ... o' §§R; 3!!2� 5 2|' ;�■;`! | |;■|`; ■!.! !)!'._�� _;�°°�!§=°r\§�; l !|■!� !:^§. ;§■;-{ ! - �j) } , .\ \\ �,°�,■#,°,\j,\ §s\n: ,�i_{ �s■::{ . . . ./_��./j,�,},-'�,\_�;�° .t2""Rj|Se�_ \.(: . { /Zl: -� £ E. z! § ./91 )2%\-�/-+�A�E�!! Ggldj\bid 2�J»/a1_xa�JlJal� a�C ARMr- .�7 �°:SS:°:■S_/ §■::! _ :'} .,�'` -. .;ci.. o .�. .... . §:§ :!!!°!!!!. |l5;. |!;|1 Al :�;: �.; §l:��§!!"°"!!"� ■|■�� | 2=� 2■■2-! ;: ::: .{ � E ,-_�°;■§=°■s!=} !;■,} ::=T -■■.�! . . ,.. . 6 ■o _�, som— a\ \ Ra)t� ��s ®s @ ss.a q;� gq {{...I.l!/ 1-{91—o , #g q/{§�\�55 a ; : @E2@Epgi2: ^rw ;| `-.' .| °�;-: , .\ �/\ ,j,��=,l,�,■„ { ■•�!/ ::`:{ :�■is ail:■: _ . ., . . , . |,■_� o;o... �� - |:...� ; g§o--3■-||!|°.! :|.:!!:°) a n�- aqr 2® \! .t w' � � )§9��ga{�a ea! �2w�/�a»��■: \\\\\\/ Art . \ -- -i \:--2E \: / /\\� :! �_ . . .. .. . ■l,r: e �.: ��. , '■';If�°� �j��\. �. , .�.., . .., . �K .i:! )¥1�:.�,. . •°°°:;,' va— \ 2\. ,! / !.§ .f■! �:3�._-_�. :Z ! :01 y` ,.��. M \, ///{//�%\\/ //}/\`\� WAY : ;�;�;.aB-��e:=; !}}�� \ ly . Ain : . - - � ,!■!i� J;:j. a; .!f. . I !E| :) : _ : .. . ! � ...... r!„�!!�� @9 \ ; |.■:. `. ') ��,�' /man.; er&o;eg;� / j/./\�\\g/\/�)} 2/ © 'aEAj2§////g#2a\ea\\!; ! | ■ | ■ � 7 �I ,;�°__�■_-��■�i |®|m{ :■�|�.||-2. ,/,-;;■ee°=a■«: _;2\: =:w9;- ` )|;!-.�� |§2�.�ssi�\s;;� {/;�� §�\|; 2■■2-( � p ul *!9 g§ ; �]) 3-6: ■■, \._' ■�■■° ■' ■■ .' | : !al.-;■2°.� {))§!\J®.xagsees1s2;f ag! \§ : s/}�}\/§| �..�� ....: !.-fit; Sags ; | ;§. 2��;=| ■ |. �°: !|, ° ,;_°-_;;.*,s;., S-.Ss ■ �,. ,;;�-! ! | ;°: .; - - .I: , : .: ;��_■■:�:,■_} lea,\ .:] \ lte�jjt .�|_-::l-:!� �� ■�. ,!!�! !■�§��|!!§;!\:\\��/!!;\) � . §g • : 91i ! Q: _ .. - - ;fw� , . :'h•a' €§:!l�GwGlw/\|/2§2a�!!, .\ /M.9 1 388.3 � .I ° � _§_°=■■§eee■■e! |�|2} ] :!{ `■■�:! � . ■��■ ! !�ci.-;2' �§_.°_■!_°:■■■. ■R■!� § 2�� ;!!;`) ! §�; : /ems/3sIs.I;: . s;:; �. _ ' |!!!; ] \|�/)!� § Sjj | Ili .sj ' �!!!/ o{nr�s�9a\q9/ViV /\ z :vI�:|;|!� o, 5.i !|! ` ' - ��-. d /:| q; s H .} moo} _!!°:;■s;�;ss;} |k|■/ 2.;.;2 . . . ,� _ � |!■: :-.. �, . .- -- ,|./��.' 2-��! 2:2 � /�� ! \ j ' q\ |.� ■%w�|l / ../tlj■Ia#. Gzb�� © �a■. Linsco", Law & Greenspan, Engineers APPENDIX J-2 I raflix Intersection Data Worksheets EXISTING + APPROVED + COMBINED PROJECT W/ CAMPISI EXT. & TRANSIT-TDM PM PEAK HOUR i. �.{ ......... ///\ :Ii FFS\2°FSS'. \\\\/ \ }}/ \\\\_l \ .6){/§\j,!2\ erum-m.//�\/;//\ �! , .. .. ; ... � . �.. �..� . .,,§§��. _ .■��_;°�: �;° , , �; .. : . ;:! SIANQ :g2Q!Q-0-101i 1 . };,! ,� . . . �, �; _�■| ;�!!\| : ! i i �/� -. �.:.�, : � _ �. s:t {b:M{ { , ' y D» swaw,q�«,w:2n2&2 - a g:a j \ � \p\\d/ /%ggEƒg Eg9{iQ\/ 1 loll )\\\,{ _myoil; O "|{#!!�.-:\! .; !§§°�E!!!°!§§!; Ni m 1 :; ; ..■! ::»�,l.� 1 ! !!!!.1n Win . .� ! xRR 2 Hi s1Gpp2�mp #aiaaiu�{ee\ e; }w w, , .� :;.� -��°��;:.®„m.; �;;�� _'._� n ! :, �;w .� _ .. .. .�, _.., it, \{§\\ pii i �gJ/�S�/w `,22, �e�,;-■�:. E.-H . w y °\Re92229jEa:2:�§622 ),-f °�{ =§;.�nssn°=9s�f ■�|§7 ! ;©} ;��2') :�:!';�|�� .��_■■=�.s;�' ■■,:� ; �\� �«■,.! SEES: § /' \ ;! _z ! ° :;=�77s§�°=§�_} ■;s■{ :®©'@g.: a 88g2 ! ss=°=§s:� ■_�_� ; :�; �sl,.| 5 . § .....9 .. .. _ .. _ ....: ! |��!) � ; !`�,;� "� =§:°�2■�°2l�B� §��§� ;!;]; ;!!;`) ■ ■ •';!;_: - � �i ;�I|�!�-,:� ,:1�-� ./, ;■■, ,�.,. ��' : Q'e�\\/\!\ / g§g2 .. 71 : I 1 ��■§;°;■!=i ,s,={ _ :•! 1. 1. 1!�: ■��■; §:_li Asa:a! \� ):\2� _ ; )) )at) .{ °.{ E§!°°l��;`!!■!{ |§!!\ /} :c{ |ss|=| }/§�Jlp sJg®E g�E9.j/'=�§ q//`2'&woos®\/;sa;§�:�sw |:� ( . S—o§g.-og,-\ p8s: a :g{ -m-:o: , � .� . i �, .. : :@n/\ §!;; | 1!2 \!!;') ■!):) : ' o ` 2_■.;.;■■;{ ■..l{ ::-!■I ,■■�.! 9o-88.00g*o\s8Isc! r� : -o ) .:! ;■ °°; ,;,�-,.■,-,s■=� ■��l�:9 :l;��■■-. ..�, . o��1! §.J� : j, ��&/ \� , ){ ) h t 5-Qe OH jig /../...... \ x /.Q:92«/ \/§!/f: /;!/•�\��§� ! . �� :;w , . !;§_ �,{!■! : ) } `i ` .• .. ; .�� : � ;! ° : . .,-; ,;�:.: _ : ., ��, �;��\l��\=�; ■\\°' � \§� :!!:°{ ) �� . ' §:■!� ! .. �§ le��)�`( � !!: 1/ Ii \ 6/g\qa\{22a!§ . .§9wh@d£g/\g& QER.3 2M/ -8 £` N 050 • 1 HTo '~ wl , oJg1 g 11 Ell W OW WE 'HY oil Oil 1 ion K Ar"Elpyk And SEA 11 RIME WA A mill 'iS M -1, 1, oo-a moo' Go j$$.o e000ai " o i 4 u ^• ..m io '� io ,� pl, o"o$0000000l�o Om`....�;a....; °Li � ;£�iIo>P" � � � °_!�§•°!�§!! |�|2} ] `|} `■■�:! � )|�I��°� ;§,�.;;);°§{;;; §;■e� |!\�' 2��2 � � .89: ; §. § ;�{ -s� -as§=: ! ..;. .- ...�. 5 .n,'88": §,! ��! -,§ .e�°:.�f.�E!■§ §§!!; o' . F33- �g 'z!!:) _ =;le.- § ;,1, ��!|!§:_ll.,;f°°� - °;:,s;°;;s=,.,!■■;|; ��,|2,■.=: ; {� 2 :)£ / 9\a5\lj22� wh%b\|225lwGR2EG£6�%2�gj: . . \)gwh@ata�/gn5azanz�Gaga�! :�).1 ° e;=�.:ss= ■!:} !s§=f : |';)|�/� §\_°°!•!!°=s,l� §\�;� _ �� -■■-e� \( (;_� .} °.\ !§E°-�•■_°:!!_{ nc; ;!P.; :■�:�) ! /1 gas g\§ 8;8� § &z lR : o}z \�s_s�99ss . 9w� 12 ■,.-:I! :�,:.: - ■ ■| ;!■; - �/k ° .�°�-!!-°`!!'{ |!|-\ § ,j=�,;■ae.=s.;, §;:;1 =:�:1 wss:=| ,.. • ��,�as��;��.! ■ |!■! r . .. -. :|=/��.k\ \j.�(.._ : I ;u§�la �;. 1999 S. BASCOM AVE. S 97-20/UP 97-11 5 OF 6 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLAN. ENVIRONMENTAL DOGS. 12/99 Initial Study and Checklist TRIG of Proposal Pruneyard Shopping Centr Date Checkbst Submiu�d: December 1994 Agency Requiring Checklist: City of Campbell Agency Address:_ 70 N. First Street City/StateJLip: _ Campbell. CA 95008 Agency Contact: Darryl Jones. Senior Planner Phone: (408) 866-2140 DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial evaluation: will a) I find that the proposed projectiriwW wt have a significant effect on the environment. and A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared............................................................... b) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the a. vironment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared....................................................... _....... _......... ........... to c) I rod the proposed project may have a significant effect on dtt onment, and An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required .........................................................................❑ Signature City of Campbell For _ Darryl Jones Print Name January 3, 1995 Date ENVIRONMENTAL CNECKUST FORM PROJECT LOCATION: City of Campbell Santa Clara County City Count) PROJECT ADDRESS: 1875 S. Bascom Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The project involves the reconfiguration of existing retail floor area; the construction of new retail floor area; expansion of a hotel use; reconfiguration of site circulation and parking; and the addition of site landscaping. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: (CEQA requires that an explanation of all "yes" and "maybe" answers be provided along with this checklist. includitrg a discussion of ways to muigate the significant effects identified. You nay attach separate sheets with the explanations on them.) Ye, maybe No 1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in: a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic substructures? ❑ ❑ CK b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? C3 ❑ ❑ G &ached c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? ❑ ❑ d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? Cl ❑ C? e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? ❑ ❑ 1) Changes in deposition or erosion of beachsands, or changes in siltation, deyosition or erosion whichmay modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any boy, inlet or lake? ❑ ❑ S) Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards, such as earthquakes, Landslides. mudslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? Cl ❑ D. AIR. Will the proposal resul: in: a) Substantisl air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? ❑ ❑ See b) Thecreationofob' ftctionablc odors. ❑ ® ❑ attached c) Alteration of au movement. moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? ❑ ❑ M. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in currents, or the course of dvr_uon of water movements. in either marine or freshwaters? ❑ ❑ COa• CAID°O°A ="VBOalamfrAL VatMM AC b) Changes in abaory...m nt...., drainage paaersM Cr the rate ad area.., of surface nnofr ® ❑ ❑ c) Altenuom to the course or now of flood water? ❑ d) Changes in the amount of surface water m any water body? ❑ ❑ c) Discharge into surface waters. or in any ahentim of surface water quality, ❑ including, but not limited to. ternperamte, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? f) ❑ ❑ Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? ❑ n g) Change in the quantity of ground waters. either throtarb direct additions or withdrawals. or through interception of an aquifer b; cuts or excavations? 0 ❑ h) Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? ❑ ❑ i) Exposure of people OF property to water mL u d hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? ❑ ❑ IV. PLANT LIFE Will the proposal resat in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or number or any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass. crops. and aquatic plants)? ❑ El Reduction Of the numbers of any unique, rate. or endangered species of plants? ❑ ❑ c) Introduction ospecies f new of plans into an area. or in a banner to the normal replenishment Of extsting species? ❑ ❑ d) Reduction in acreage of any apiculmral crop? ❑ ❑ V. ANIMAL LIFE. Will the proposal result in: a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (buds: land animals, including reptiles: fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? ❑ ❑ b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species or animals? ❑ ❑ c) Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the mignuon or movement of animals? d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? ❑ ❑ ❑ Vf. NOISE. Will the proposal resat in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? ❑ ❑ b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ❑ ❑ VII. LIGHT and GLARE. WUl Me proposal: a) Produce new light rr glare? ❑ ❑ y VIII. LAND USE Will the proposal result in. a) Substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an am? ❑ ❑ Z IX. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal resatr in: a) Increase to the rate Of use of any natural resources? ❑ ❑ tq W X. RISK OF UPSET. Will the propc:al involve: a) A risk of an explosion or die release of hazardous substances (including, bu*. not limited to: Oil. pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? ❑ ❑ a ' Indicates see attached comment sheet. (XCAI CAt.OcmtYtA aarNOpmaeN Or•vrracT b) Possible mWffftMc with an emergency tespaue plan or an emergency e-tacuation plan? ❑ X1. POPULATION. Will the proposal: a) Alter the location. disinbuuon. density or growth rate of he h;, an po whuan Of an area? X11. HOUSING. Will the proposal: a) Aff«t misting housing, or create a demand fu addluanal housing? U XILt. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal result in: a) Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking'/ ❑ ❑ C) SubsromW impact upon misting transportation syn ems? ❑ d) Alterations to preen[ pstterm of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? ❑ e) Alterations to win rbomK, nil OF air traffK? ❑ () Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or WAess fans? ❑ XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an elect upon or result in a nerd for new or altered (OMernmerr(nl services In may Of the follawin( areas: a) Fire potation? ❑ b) Police protection? ❑ C) Schools? d) Parks a xlrer recreational facilities? ❑ e) Maintenance of ppsbkic facilities, including roads? Elf) Other governmental services? ❑ X V. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in.. A) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy' ❑ b) Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources of energy. or require development Of -:w sources of energy? ❑ XVI. UTILITIES and SERVICE SYSTEMS. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems. OF substanna/ alterations to the followinj juih'ues. a) Power or natural gas? ❑ b) CommuniAuonssystems? ❑ C) Water? ❑ d) Sewer or septic tanks? ❑ e) Storm water drainage? R f) Sold waste and disposal' XVII. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal resulrin: a) Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard texcluding mental ha ui)? ❑ b) Exposure of people to potential health hazards? Cl • Indicates see attached comment sheet ❑ 51 ❑ to � wDOaaaIA OIVOOMQMK QQMdff. XVHL AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in: a) The obstruction of any scenic visa or view open to the public? ❑ ❑ b) The creation of an aenheucally offensive site open to public view? ❑ ❑ 10 XIX. RECREATION. Will the proposal result in: a) Impact upon the quality or quanuty of existing recreational opportunities? ❑ ❑ Q XX. CULTURAL RESOURCES Will the proposal: a) Result in the aheration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archam:oy.cal are: ❑ ❑ b) Result in adverse physical oraesthetic eirects to a ptdd-saric ar hicsotic building, structure, or object? ❑ ❑ c) Have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ❑ ❑ d) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact am? ❑ ❑ XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE - a) Potential to degrade: Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the envuenmem. substantially reduce the habitat of a fah or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife popdauon to drop below self sYnaaing levels. threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare cr endangered plant or animal of eliminate impontant examples of the major penods of California history or pehisrory? ❑ ❑ b) Short-term: Does the project have Ux potential to achieve short-rJm, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental gods? (A short-term impact an the environment is one which occurs in a relatively, brief, defuulive period of time. Long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) ❑ ® ❑ c) Cumulative: Does the project have impacts which are individually limised. but cumulauvely considerable? (A project may impact on two or Mae separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect on the tow of arse impacts on Use environment is sipuficant.) ❑ Cl d) Substantial adverse: Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly sir indirectly? ❑ ❑ XXIL DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION. (This section may be filled out by using narrative, or by ruing a form. such as the example #cox ut the CEQA Guide- lines.) XXIIL DISCUSSION OF LAND USE IMPACTS. (An examination of whether the project would be consistent with existing zoning, plans. and ocher applicable land use controls.) (Note This is only a suggested form pwruani to CEQA Guidelines. Section 13063(d). Public agencies arejfee to device their own forma for uutial studies. However. the DETERMINATION is an essential component of tHs form) PRUNEYARD INITIAL STUDY )OCIL DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION Cnmment 1 t EARTH (b) - Development of the project will result in the disruption, compaction and overcovering of the soil. However, the areas that will be covered are already covered by buildings and/or paved driving and walking surfaces. The project will not increase the amount of overcovering or compaction of soil. Cnmment N2 II. AIR (a.b) - Both site grading and preparation for new construction, and building demolition will result in additional dust being generated from the project site area. Large construction related machinery will also release additional particulate matter emissions into the air. Staff has determined (based on construction phasing over time) that the amount of additional matter released into the air will be minimal. The applicant will be required to provide construction equipment which properly muffles emission exhausts and odors, consistent with policies of the Bay Area Air Quality M, nag_'ment District. Comment U III WATER (b) - Existing drainage patterns, absorption rates, and the amount of surface runoff will be altered as a result of this project. The site contains an existing drainage system which appears to be adequate. All new and reconfigured structures and circulation routes will be required to demonstrate adequate site drainage prior to issuance of building and demolition permits. Comment M4 Yj—NOISE fa) - Building demolition and reconfiguration during construction on site will result in additional noise being generated from the site. Additionally, large construction related ma: hinery will also generate noise. Staff has determined (based on construction phasing over time) that the amount of additional or potential for severe noise will be minimal. The applicant will be required to provide construction equipment which properly muffles noise generated by such equipment, and that construction and clean up activities comply with permitted construction hours in accordance with Sections 18.02.060 and 18.04.035 of the City of Campbell Municipal Code. Comment M5 • II LIGHT & GLARE (a) - With the reconfiguration of existing structures and the addition of new structures and access ways on site, there will be an increase in the amount of on site lighting All lights will be required to be shielded away from adjacent properties. However, the amount of additional lighting proposed on site is not expected to be significant and will be reviewed by staff prior to issuance of building permits. Comment M6 Vill. LAND USE (a)-- Development of the proposed project will not result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land uses in the area. It is expected however, that the project with intensify existing uses at the site. Comment M7 MII. TRANSPORTATION / CIRCULATION (a.b.c.d. f) - A traffic report prepared by the project proponent has been prepared and submitted to the City for review. The report concluded that the traffic and circulation in the area would be impacted by the redevelopment of the property, however the impact on traffic and circulation generated by the project would not be significant. Although the traffic report concludes that there will not be a significant increase in additional vehicular movement, there are existing traffic movement and circulation conflicts off site which currently impact the existing transportation system. The traffic report does not consider or address the existing site access and egress conditions or. Campbell Avenue (or at Union Avenue) or access into the site from the driveway at the northern property line. These conditions will further impact present patterns of vehicular and pedestrian circulation including the potential for an increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians with an increase in traffic to and from the site. The City has determined that the proposed project may further inhibit the transportation system's capacity as related to this project. Off site traffic improvements are necessary to minimize further impacts because of additional traffic generated by this project. Comment N8 XVI. UTILITIES do SERVICE SYSTEMS (d.e) - The project may result in the need for modifications to the existing sewer system. Additional paved surface areas on site will result in additional runoff. Upgrades to the existing storm drainage system, including new connections, may be required per generally accepted engineering practice. XXIII. DISCUSSION OF LAND USE IMPACTS The Campbell General Plan designates commercial uses at the project site. Redevelopment of this site will continue to be consistent with the General Plan designation for the site and the immediate area. Likewise, the use is consistent with permitted uses in the designated zoning district and related redevelopment plans for the area. 1 N N 1 A N O O t y 8 N l n 0 9 E •n° ` C 1., La -[-A Li -: � s 111llllllalllillllllllll!§1:!ininl,,,, .J � — s A•Ala A yd A, !A',0V ,emu i n M i A A o o v v ■ R 1 n o Y '{'Ei. L.\` \ \ \\\ \7 '{C � tl111""""'�11rr -'a a M rI Hil z0 7 n N 1 A N o a 8 r 9 N A n A NO. 04CM2-10 TRAFFIC STLJY FOR PRUNEYARD SHOPPING CENTER AT BASCOM AND CAMPBELL CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA lftbquka M1 owaMQie 4088OLVINS Ineivagmg � (Mt) 4w7m TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION...................................................1 STUDY APPROACH................................................4 SUMMARY.......................................................5 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................... 7 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS ..................................... 9 VARIATION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS ................................ 11 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS ........................................ 13 PROJECT CONDITIONS ............................................ 15 PROJECT IMPACTS...............................................23 CONCLUSIONS.................................................. 25 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY INTRODUCTION The purpose of this study is to identify traffic impacts of the proposed Pruneyard Shopping Center modification in the City of Campbell. The project she is bested on Bascom Avenue roar the Intersection of Bascom and Campbell Avenue as shown on Figure 1. The proposed project sligrxrrsnt calls for a reduction In total gross leasable ere$ from 288,518 square feet to 255.857 square fsK and an buxom In to total number of occupied hotel rooms from 118 to 168. Access to the sits will be provided via three (3) driveways along Bascom Averws and #was (3) driveways along Campbell Avenue. The proposed project is w poc ted to be completed by 19M. This study will &valuate the traffic impacts at key intersections during the P.M. peak hour. Traffic impacts from shopping centers typically occur in the P.M. peak hour. Intersection level of service analyses; were performed for the following eight intersections: • Selmer Avenue/Hamihon Avenue • Cr•eksids Way/Hamilton Avenue • Bascom Avonue/Hamihon Avenue • Campo Way/Bascom Avenue • Pruneyard Driveway/Bascom Avenue • Campbell Avenue/Bascom Avenue • Union Avenue/Campbell Avenue • Highway 17 NB/Off-ramp at Crookskfo Way In addition to analyzing Intersection level of service, this report also evaluate$ psrlbmg needs and on -site, circulation, with the proposed project. P �r DAVID AVENUE HAMILTON AVE rUE WATSON DR I m ; DOMES i al ••I., <I N SATIN R AVE < } Y i 4 ROB VE � ? i � GP MDGEIv OR CAA PB LL _� � MA A„� W CA PEEL AV NUE EEwmELL DR w L'i w CAMPBEL AVE i Q RINiON AVE O� LLJ ' V IMF' O O 0 J z / /� < 3 UDC, AVENUEI m � I I LOCATION MAP PRUNEYARD SHOPPING CENTER K40DMATM 'AMPB::L CORNER OF BASCOM i CAtiPBEU AVENM � CALIFORNIA IftB Kni" fmwR. w• �.w .« r. .w IM w.. C. Mt)• •�•••••••• .•••••.•• I.wMw-Hlw/ti. I.wMw-.rA. i z The intersections noted above were analyzed to determine the levels of service under four 6--ados: t. Existing conditions 2. Background conditions 3. WW project ooindtdors 4. Project with future growth oonditiors STUDY APPROACH This study is divided into four phases. The first phase involves determining peak hour traffic volumes at the study intersections. Thr wdsting traffic counts for all eight Intersections were obtained from the City. Brian Kangas Foulk counted right -turn volumes at the intersection of Bascom and Campisi Way during P.M. peak. The second phase Involves determinng alto traffic generation and distribution. Traffic generated from the site was assigrted to the study intersections for intersection level of service analyses. The third phase involves conducting Intersection analyses wing the CAPSSI-11 software for all intersections. IMemection level of service analyses were conducted for the four scenaras noted above and for P.M. peak hour only. since n*c ffic impacts on adjacent streets from the shopping center typically occur in the afl -.noon peak tour. The fourth phase is a careful exAminstion of capacity calculation rear U to determine If mitigation improvements are needed. SUMMARY With the reduction of gross leasable area 12,661 square feet and an additional 50 hotel rooms. the modification of the Prunsyard Shopping Center is expected to generate an additional 146 trips during P.M. peak hour because of the change of vacancy rate would be assumed to change from 30% currently to 6% when the project Is completed. Access to the site would be provided via three driveways on Bascom Avenue and two driveways on Campbell Avenue. Table - S indicates the Intersection at Hamilton and Sahm is currently operating at Level of Service E+ with an average delay of approximately 42 seconds. The remaining intersections are operating at Level of Service C or better with an average delay of approximately 20 seconds or Was. Under the Project with Future Growth condition, the intersection at Hamilton and Salmar will operate at Level of Service E with an average delay of approximately 45 seconds due to heavy existing northbound and southbound right -turn volume. For the remaining intersections. the levels of service and delay at each of these intersections would remain essentially unchanged. Since the level of service for all intersections are maintained above E. none of the eight intersections are significantly impacted by the project Therefore, no traffic mitigation would be required for the project based on level of service impacts. 5 TABLE S SUMMARY LEVELS OF SERVICE P.M. PEAK HOUR M1Mndbrh Corn Don EaIMYp AD LOB smovowb AD LOS VWt*Pr 00 AD LOS P. wln FG AD LOS FwrhiortBaMhr 1imw @ E+ A E♦ 42 E+ 46 E FwnMory mekWft 11Axuw S 6+ a B+ a s+ a a+ iwnlrorVSMWorn 11=04 20 C+ 26 C• !0 C- 20 C- 0momm/Roult 17 11imwwm 6 A 1 6 A 6 A 1 6 A Sao-vt—phm 11/03104 17 C+ 17 C+ 17 C+ 17 0+ on-m1Pro-far0 itA7SVW 7 B+ 7 !+ 7 D+ 7 B+ 5mcwmClrnpb*l N1AM 11 B 11 6 11 6 11 B- C-MbW Jrion grim a B+ a B+ a a+ S B+ FG . Fmn Growth AD - Avutq DOW (in ) DESCRIPTIONS OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing intersection vehicular turning movements were obtained trom the City of Campbell. Ong geometrics for study intersections were obtained from aerial photographs and confirmed by City stag. Existing Roadway System Hamilton Avenue is a heavily travelled arterial street. Hamilton Avenue carries an average defy traffic (ADT) volume of 87,00o vehicles near Bascom Avenue. It runs in an east-wast direction and has six through -lanes with separate turn lanes at intersections. With three through -lanes for each direction and separate turn lanes at the iMemections, Bascom Avenue runs in a north -south direction from San Jose to Los Gatos, and also Is a heavily travelled arterial street It carries average daft' traffic of 44,000 vehicles near Hamilton Avenue. Campbell Avenue, with two lanes in each direction, is a secondary city arterial street which runs in an sast-west direction. Union Avenue With one lane in each di.. -tion and separate turn lanes at some intersections, Union Avenue it a secondary City arterial street Union Avenue starts at Campbell Avenue and ends at Blossom Hill Road, running In a north -south direction. Two Santa Clara County transit routes serve near the project site. One runs north -south along Bascom Avenue and one runs east -west along Campbell Avenue and tums on Bascom Avenue. On Bascom Avenue, Route 62 provides local service between Piedmont/Sierra to Los Gatos. 17his route operates on 1 Sminute headways during commute periods and on 30-minuts headways during the oft -peak hours. On Campbell venue, Route 26 provides service between Eastridge Mall and Lockheed. South 26 operates on a 30-minute headway all day. LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS Using the "CAPSSI-I I" computer software. Intersection analyses were conducted for all study Intersections. Analyses of traffic volumes are useful In understanding the general nature of traffic in an area, but, by themselves, indicate ndther the ability of the street network to carry additional traffic, nor the quality of service afforded by the street facility. For this reason. the concept of "level of service' has been developed to correlate numerical traffic vokxne data to subjective descriptions of traffic performance at Intersections. Table I defines the bevel of service' categories 'A" through 'P and indicates the quaf five definition of each category and the corresponding delay. TABLE I Intersection Level of Service Definitions Signalized Intersections Level of Service Interpretation Delay (seconds) A Uncongested operations; aI queues dear In a single signal cycle Mft or no bvfflo delays). <5 B Stable flow. Vehicle platoons are formed (short traffic delays). 5.1 - 15 C Light congestion; occasional backups on critical approaches (average traffic delays). 15.1 - 25 D Significant congestion on critical approaches but intersection functional. Cars required to waft through more than one cycle during short peaks. No longstanding queues formed (long traffic delays). 25.1 - 40 E Severe congestion with some longstanding queues on critical approaches. Blockage of Intersection may occur B traffic signal does not provide for protected turning movenents. Traffic queue may block nearby Intersection(s) upstream of critical approach(es) (very king traffic delays). 40.1 - 60 F Total breakdown; stop -and -go operation (extreme traffic delays). >60 10 EVALUATION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS The results of the level of service analyses made using existing traffic volumes and lane geometries at the intersections under study are summarized in Table 11. As seen by the table, with the Hamilton Avenue and Samar Avenue Intersection excepted, all study intersections operate satisfactorily at Level of Service C or better. The Intersection of Hamilton Avenue and Selmer Avenue operates at Level of Servioe E (with a delay of 42 seconds). The existing P.M. peak volumes for all study intersections we shown In Figure 2. TABLE II LEVELS OF SERVICE EXISTING CONDITIONS P.M. PEAK HOUR Intersection Count Date Delay LOS Hamifton/Salmar 11/3/94 42 E+ Hamitton/Cresksids 11/3194 8 B+ HamiRon/Bascom 11/3194 20 C+ Creskside/Route 17 11/3/94 5 A Bascom/Campisl 11/3/94 17 C+ Bascom/Pruneyard 11/9/94 7 B+ Bascom/Campbell 9/1194 11 B- Campbeil/Union 8/28/94 8 B+ Delay (seconds) Ik o JIB } r ice: `0 oin } r '„; Xc: +e e no Jfn } r o ege fa i HAMILTON AVENUE a � ?�, •o } r Z In ` c 9 >)l � A P PRUNEYARD J o a sit' CAM -SELL AVENUE n 1 CAMPBELL AVE Z LO X 1 •,oJ s f r Z m I / i DUSTING CONDITION - pM PEAK i PRU EYARO SHopPNO CENM CORNER OF BASCOM i CANVIELL AVENUE :AMPBELL I CALIFORNIA] emu� F" NOU 2 12 • 1 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS Evaluation of Background Conditions Background traffic conditions consist of existing traffic volumes added to volumes expected from Projects approved by the City of Campbell but rt ;rot built and occupied. Turning movements at each Intersection for approved project were provided by City staff for this Study. Figure 3 shows the background turning movement volumes for all study Intersections. Background levels of service and delay for each study Intersection are contained In Table III. TABLE III LEVELS OF SERVICE BACKGROUND CONDITIONS P.M. PEAK HOUR Intersection Count Date Delay Background LOS Hamlltonr almar 11/3/94 43 E+ HamiltcwCreekside 11/3/94 a B+ Hamilton/Basoom 11/3/94 pp C. Creekskle/Route 17 11 /3/94 S A Bascom/Camplal 11/3/94 17 C+ Basc— PnmaYard 11/9/94 7 B+ Bascom/Campbell 9/1/94 11 B. Cempbell/Unlon a2e/94 E B+ 13 SACKOROUND CONXTION - PM PEAK PRUNEYARD SHOPPING CENTER CORNER OF SASCOM A CAAPBELL AVENUE r�ueer I�rNr-lW/N. NMNr-��N PROJECT CONDITIONS Trip Generation Trip generation rates during the P.M. peak hours for the moclftd Prunsyard Shopping Center were taken from the Institute of Transportation Engineers publication Trio Generation, Fifth Edition, 1991. The traffic will be generated from two parts of the "act; hotel and reW. There will be an additional 50 new hotal room to be added on at the existing hotel. With the reduction of gross leasable area of 1ZO81 square feet, the project ag will generate additional trips compared to the existing aka. This assumes the vacancy rpts would chenge from 30% currently to 8% when the project is completed. Table IV shows M calculation and total trips are generated by the project. 15 TABLE IV RETAIL ELEMENT The total gross leasable floor area is 268,518 SF The proposed project will eliminat 76,237 SF The project will add 63,576 SF Total new feasible alas will be 255,657 SF From ITE PM peak Trip Formula for shopping centers Ln(T) - 0.537 Ln(X) + 3.553 when: T ■ Trips during the peak tour and X - Leasable Floor Area in 1,0Ws Solving for T (when X - 255.857) - 1,194 Trips This is the anticipated trip generation for the proposed project The existing trip generation should be estimated and subtracted from the above value to provide an estimate of the anticipated increase in traffic over present volumes. Currently, Pruneyard Shopping Canter has a vacancy rate of 30%. However. the typical shopping center in Santa Clare County is 6.8% (Source: Business Journal, October 24, 1994). Therefore, the adjusted excess vacancy rate is 23.4%. The existing adjusted leasable area - 268.518 X 78.8% - 205,885 Using the formula: Ln(T) ■ 0.637 Ln(X) + 3.553 T - 1039 Trips Therefore, the additional trips expected to the Pruneyard from the retail portion = 1,194 - 1.039 - 155 trips during the PM Peak. Assuming a 30% by-pass rate for these trips then the new trip generation would be: 155 X 70% - 108 TE HOTEL ELEMENT NUMBER OF NEW ROOM: 50 P.M. PEAK TRIP --ENERATION RATE: 0.76 wImm P.M. PEAK PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUME: 50 X 0.76 n/rgca - 38 TE TOTAL PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUME INCREASE TOTAL PROJECED TRIP INCREASE - RETAIL + HOTEL 1087E+36TE-146TE 11 16 Project traffic distribution was provided by City staff using 'Campbell Model 2010 Network". All projected trips were run through the Model 2010 Network to develop traffic assignments. Project traffic was assigned to the roadway system Consistent with the project traffic distribution pattem. Both Inbound and outbound at P.M. peak four project traffic vokin es for all study irnersections an shown In Figure 4. Project turning movements were added to the background volumes to obtain the expected total traffic volumes at each intersection. Figure 5 shows the project turning movement volumes for all study intersections. The results of the with -project analysis an contained in Table V. 17 i •eoo �_, ,ea ,a bg*)Lc o f I r o Jl—+ I r I � 13 .00 a o _ Irl L ', S i eo. p • J I p o J Ir Lo 0 Ir 0 e.e S -) `o HAMILTON AVENUE -o Jle 0 Sl I r 010 N Q� OC ' vi 9 A L0 • a J 1 c P� 0 J PRUNEYARD ul ee CAMP BELL AVENUE 0 fr I � z LO a K V 2 e I � p� � m -• Lp p J p I pJ_er a PROJECT VOLUMES — PM PEAK PRUNEYARD SHOPPING CENTER CORNEA OF BASCOM i CAMPBELL AVENIIIE CAMDBELI � CALIFORNIA Mi tir M ►. J... Y �yy �� 4 TABLE V LEVELS OF SERVICE PROJECT CONDITIONS P.M. PEAK HOUR n Count Data Delay nd Background Salmar 11AW 43 _ E+ Creekside 11/3/94 0 B+ /Basoom FBasconVCamPl8i 11/3/94 20 C- e/Route 17 11 /3194 5 A Camplei 11/3/94 17 C+ Pruneyard 11/9194 7B+ Campbell 911/94 11 B- CampbelJUnion 5/28/94 a B+ PROJECT WITH FUTURE GROWTH Because of traffic growth. all existing traffic volumas need to be updated to the conditions that the project is completed and the buildings are ready to be occupied with a growth rate of 1.2 percent per year (0.1 percent per month). Project traffic volumes with future growth for each study intersection are shown in Figure 6. The results of the Project with Future Growth analysis for each study intersection are contained in Table VI. TABLE VI LEVELS OF SERVICE PROJECT WITH FUTURE GROWTH CONDITIONS P.M. PEAK HOUR Aiterseatlon Count Date Delay Background LOS Hamllton/Salmar 11 /3194 45 E Hamitton/Creekside 11/3/94 8 B+ Hamitton/Basoom 1113/94 20 C- Cr"kekSe/Routs 17 11/3194 5 A BasconVCampisi 11/3/94 17 C+ Bascom/Prunoyard 11/9/94 7 B+ Bascom/Campbell 9/1/94 11 B- Campbelt/Union W28/94 8 B+ 0 PROJECTIMPACTS Adding the project generated traft, capacity calculations for all study intersections were analyzed using CAPSSI-11 computer software. Intersection trait volumes for all scenarios are displayed on Figures 2 to 6. The resulting levels of service are shown in Table VII. TABLE VII SUMMARY LEVELS OF SERVICE P.M. PEAK HOUR I tusoctbn C•: m Due EMWV AD LOS Dwkgoum AD LOS W M•Pro)sa AD LOS P"a with FG AD LOS HsmBorVSsknsr 11m31W 42 E+ 43 E+ 43 E+ 45 E 1IM3191 a 9+ $ 8+ a B+ a 8+ Hrrtapy8room 1UO3/W 20 C+ 2A C• 20 C• 25 C. CrsskskWRous 17 11ID394 5 A 1 5 A 5 A 5 A B111—r-rrrp4 11AKm 17 C+ 17 C+ 17 C+ 17 C+ BucpNPrurlsyW 11m W 7 8+ 7 B+ 7 8+ 7 9+ Bncarrvc—1 I 9/194 11 B- 11 R. 11 8- 11 8- CsmpbslWnlon 5/2504 a e+ o B+ a 9+ a 9+ FG . Funs Growth AD . Avsrsps Do* (in $00-ft) EK As shown in Table VII, the levels ol service for all study intersections remain essentially unchanged between existing conditions and Project with Future Growth conditions. There are able existing driveways servicing Pruneyard Shopping Center. With the traffic signal, to major driveway is located at the north side of the shopping certter at Bascom Avenue with full access. With right4n and right -out on Bascom Avenue, there are two other driveways located south of the major driveway. There are one two-way and two ora~way driveways bated on Campbell Avenue. AA existing driveways are serving property to the project ake and will remain unchanged. All now major traffic circulation aisles In the perking lot will maintain at least 24-feet wide and will not block access to fire truck and other emergency vehicles. PARKING DEMAND According to the City of Campbell Parking Code, a ratio of four spaces per 1,000 square feet Is required. The modified Pruneyard Shopping Center would have a retail space of 255,857 square feet. A total of 1,023 parking spaces would be required for retail stores/shopping center use under current standards. For the hotel, one parking space per room is required by the City. The modified hotel would have 168 guest rooms. A total of 168 parking spaces should be provided for the hotel. 24 CONCLUSIONS The modified Pruneyard Shopping Center would generate 155 additional trips during P.M. peak from retail (assume vacancy rate would be 6.0% when Vie Project is completed). Since aPProximately 30 Percent of the project -generated traffic would be pass -by traffic. the ne. Project traffic impact from retail on the adjacent street is 106 additional trips. Then also would be 38 new trips generated by additional hotel rooms during P.M. pack. During P.M. peck, the totai 146 � � hinged in the vicinity of the project alto from the entire shopping Carter is Using CAPSSI-11 computer software, a total Of eight intersections in the vicinity of the project site were analyzed to determine existing conditions and future levels of service when Lie Project is Completed. The results of the analysis indicate that under existing conditions. all study intersections. with the intersection of Hamilton and Selmer Avenues excepted, will operate at levels of service between Level of Service A (indicating no delay) and Level of Service E (indicating average CIOLays). The average delay for these intersections range from 8 seconds to 20 seconds per vehicle. The intersection of Hamilton Avenue and Selmer Avenue will operate under existing conditions at Level of Service E with an average delay of 42 seconds per vehicle. Under the Project with Future Growth condition, the level of service at these intersectio remain essentially unchanged with ns would aver intersection Of Hamilton Avenue and Salmar dAve _y the W of ew� for an intersections are maintained above Level of Service E. none of the eight intersections are significantly impacted by the project. Therefore. no traffic mitigation would be required for the Project based on level of service impacts. K'%DESIGNVM&)4ZTgAFFIC.STD 25 APPENDoc a TRAT/1C COLOT REPORT 11/07/94 OI:i7:ll RIrOIT TILL: UMAS.RIr W/C: IAKW1/NAIIILTOI KSUI►TION: YICOINAR LTON INTIAUCTION TUN COUNTS NAKILTON INTnCONKCT SYSTBI City .( Ct10.1t 03/ZO/OL .. Rlrgf rwN: 061031 To. 941107 DATA LAINM: 1 MNRU NMILTOI D TIM AT IAMW (LINK "I) : GALT NMILTp1 U LT AT DRDCM (Lit 901) 3 OTNM) WILTON Nt TM AT SANW1 (LINK 00C) L WLT WILTON r LT AT IMAM (LINK WS) S NDTNNU M/WI » TNW AT NMILTLM tilt Dot) A MLT 11A1m1 0 LT AT WIILTON (LINK M) 7 WTNNU MICON NK Tau AT WULTON (LIM 9") A MLT DASM NK LT AT W(ILTM (LINK WT) t um WILTON N Or WW1 10 GKT NMCLTON t OF SAWM 11 IMT NM111011 If IT AT 111019M IT IMT NA1110m w RT AT WW1 1! NIRT 90= NK RT AT NMILIM 14 nay DASM A AT AT maim" At 3 WAT TILIt: 941031 NON 941101 ME 147/02 NTD 96110 TKU 011106 TRI TUFFIC COUNT RAPMI - NMMS.UP 11/07/OG PW 1 A60011Y MR: 0ASCOM/11MILTON VOL-1 VOL-2 VOL .3 VOL-4 vm-S VOL-6 %VL.7 vm-0 v0L-v YOLTO wall VOL 12 VOL13 VM14 M M W M OOTNSU COLT IaTN6U vaLT N0TN6U MY MTN60 9BL1 10ST OAST SS61 HST N06T MY TOTAL 1" 31 17 1313 66211 136 2M 10L3 Sri 975N 625 &M MI 66 1S4 M6 $11 14.356 m S) is /6SM 960 ML 274 1021 T" 1051 SOM aSIS 316" $54 1?2 36#_ 541 ISM -?w 117 "I" SAG 0100 a1Y "a 113" "1 36 &am 2517N 4" 160 2M 676 13771N Tw 1 Is 17v7 SN m s12 Im U2 TT7M "a AM Sa77 S0111 06 3w S23 "1S76L e W 217 OY M1 94 ON 076 SA KS 3711 an am NO la0 2916 An Tali iM 21a 1331 971 m = ISM 6Ni1 1052 651 6606% 3075 601N "" 330 934 ISM TOU 3 17 13110 631 = 267 ITN 56 004 INN 6107 zw SIG, 1716 300 47SN SAW 70) 3 to 1565 SIGN 067% 3m 10" 62S 1000 662 65M 3113 m 100 397 59r1 N@I TOTM 116711 M16 7016 2375 sm 66A0 HM 36M Mlw7 UW A 6100 15M 8613 41a0 120262 Avvrm iw 577 Mt a" 1= m 9" 625 am 2W Su 173 32T $14 ISM ai"Ifto ) 1311 S16 010 am v71 513 a7S 32a "a aim U1 III 1v1 aS Ism a6ANNIwLN) 163a 6K K7 3" 1000- 6" 3136 S06 6606 Sus S" 194 3" "a 11025 iM.aS7. 1ZZ.9 40.0 45.4 34.7 36.2 64.6 01.S 47.3 A.6 275.6 32.0 19.3 MJ 20.0 OM.a Tw761 L d- M tins • a TMA7/IC COUNT AK.DMT ,1/07/DL w:N:a0 t PMV FILE: MARM.MKI MMK: CUMIDC/MMILTOM 1 0CMI.TIOn CpMC{IDUMMILTW IMTURCTIOM TMCOXTt WIILTa IMTIRCOMM(CT STSM city N CMM}h-ll, OAr7 1,.Wr 10/10/13 I.OIT ISM: 941031 T0. :K1107 DATA COLUMN: 1 OTMD MMILTOM O TNW AT CUM104 (LINK 702) 2 IITMAY 1100II1,100 W TOW AT CMK6A104 (LIM[ 7W) 3 um AMILTa1 Will DT TO OW17 AT CRUICSI0K (LIMK7,0) C MOLT WIILTM If LT AT CMMIN tLIM 701) S =P- CMU1011 MA R4 AT MXILTa CLINK 112) D MLl OtB MtN O LT AT MMILTOI CLIK 70L) 7 EMT MARTON O MT AT CMOOIOK tLIMK 71631 . S mAIT .IL04: DL1031 p 047101 TM 941102 IO 9411O TW %110L 7M1 TRAFFIC MOT AI/OIIT • MAMCr3.A[� 11/oUs" ow 1 A190I1T RAM, Q11Mt IDl/MAMILTOM VOL-1 VOL-2 VOL-3 xx-& VOL-$ VOL-6 VOL•7 A011 am SIIOY Raw t1AW wm um XAOY i110Y K DA M 19TNIU MTrAu MAT bet A6AT "Ll l9AT TOTAL AV906t1 TOT-1 TOT-2 TOT-3 TOT-4 TOT-S TOT-6 TOT-7 MW 31 17 2075 loco 609 63 311 Sib 230 5"0 W6 36.6 31.9 10.6 1.1 5.5 9.6 6.2 MOr 31 is 230M 1932 670 60 7W 630 330M 6" & M ', .-. 30.9 10.7 1.1 6.9 10.1 �9.7 5.4 t 17 196sA 170IN ss6M 66 2w s05 214M SU70 7674 NJ 32.5 10.6 0.9 5.0 4.1 . _1ul TM 1 to II>t 1M2 MO/ N f00 no SL 605 019 77.3. r .1 "1 0.9 6.9 10.2 6.7. O00 217 2012 1707 sof „ 33a Sol 26S SRl� mY.6 R.b 10.6 1.1 6.0 9.1 6.6 WED 2 10 2w 2006M 727% s7 V9 662M a? JIM Wp 31.6 32.2 11.7 0.9 4.5 10.3 6.6 TNII 3 17 2019 1715 sot ft 307 67iM 279 5696 76s 36.7 8.5 10.6 0.9 5.6 6.6 S.1 TMU 3 to UM 200/ m 61M n6 600 301 61" R6 56.4 32.3 15.4 0.7 6.6 9.7 6.9 Total 17111 1NOL s093 KO zw 6f16 210s 66633 Awr.9. 2139 1663 W7 ss 200 %5 m sm MUi�fr) 196S 1701 s56 61 260 476 21L S22T 767 M.alstsKlU 23D0 2006 727 K 332 442 no 6253 W3 n6.0... 132.0 t06.b So.? 7.5 20.9 62.1 36.5 376.S Total erwr N I lee . 6 TRAFFIC CIA" REPORT 11/07/94 09:0"9 REPORT FILE, IWLSAL.:IEF PAW: SALMAA/1T/RMILION ^ AFTER 9/13/13 DESCRIPTION: SAIILAR/17/NANILTON INTERSECTION TLMN CMA1TS MMILTOM INTERCONNECT SYSTEM C7ty N CRASH 10/19/9S MEFAY FROM: 941031 TO: 9L1107 DATA COLONS: 1 MMU WILTON U YOU AT SRLEMM (LOW M) 2 WTIW YIIILTM O TOO AT SALOA (LINK Sob) S SOLT NMILTM W LT AT SALNAN (LIK $91) A WMT SAUMR W 11 AT MALTY (LINK $11) i NUT ULMR W LT AT 10111111.1011 (LIM SR) b WMT ON 17 W AT AT WIILI= (LIM SIT) 7 "IMM WIT W LT AT WIILTO• (L1K 90) S WOMM► 0 WRILTOI TO M INKOV SAW 9 KLAKI NMILTM O TOY LAW /1 (LEFT LSE) 10 EKAN92 MARILYN it THIN) LAW R (RIM E LYE) 11 E11LANE3 NAMILTON A TOY LYE 0 (MIONT LANE) ?!"'� 12 NEAT WIILTON W RT 10 17 O M'4AW S Coal FILES: 911071 NOR 941101 M 941102 WED 941103 TW 141/06 FRI TulTIC COW REPORT . MOSAL.0[► 11/07/a P.O. 1 M1011 OAR: 3ALOAA/17/IMIILTON s AFTER 9/13/93 VOL-1 VOL-2 VOL-3 VOL-4 VOL-5 VOL•A VOL-T VOL-8 VOL.9 VOL10 VOL" p1A0M MOOOT• PLAN' EALAAE2 ULAAE3 VOL72 M0T 00V AOI >v01 TOTAL AVEOACE TOT 1 M OR O0 EOTAOU YOTOOM WOLF SORT OOLT 3s0T 0 AM 59 0 a 0 GM Sao W 0 &US 4" 33.6 1101131 17 no 2106 1506 a a MS 904 72 O0. 37 to 20a5 1r 0 AS] 61 0 0 O SAAO 4WA s 0 5727O all" 4 . -TIR 117 teTw 1"l IK ° W A7 O a eAf °es eK 0 an 961 -53.1 Im 1 19 am 15M 0 Afa 07 0 .0 0 o SM f26 IS? "35 1N t 17 19U lcsv 0 1.77 AS 0 0 0 dow AA2T1 TIPS 0 Kttl 33-9 MD 2 IS212111 TO" 0 4 M TO 0 0 0 Sat $1a OTM 0 sm aL7 33.6 TO) 3 17 19T2 143/0 0 ASS A911 0 0 0 aLs A3A 7920 0 aM 32.9 TOY 3 1s 2072 late 0 AM 77H a 0 0 sm "A "a 16 1210 Mot TOM In" 0 SM SIT 0 M1A N416 7K as m sm j.&y A11co AV.T.e. zor 1s" Me AM ac 0 0 366 NA 7R a fm aU 111n1rEOS 19M U31 0 AnA9 0 614 pO1AYAT0) Z121 1AL7 0 496 T7 ° 0 0 f2 2 P.O 0 2Ksa sta."'. $1.4 M.e 0 ts.$ 7.e 0 TOTAL 10A010T 01 0M • e 11/07/% 08:54:3� TMAFFIc COURT 49*02' MErOST FILE: CEEI7"r MMK: C\EEEs10E/NT17 Ms oEttslrT{W: CAEECtIDE/IAMIT Ms IMTEssEC710M TUAM C"T3 MAMILTOM IMTLCCWNECT VSTEM CITT W CAWULL. 4930 r11 3/10,'13 xvml non: 111031 TO: 961107 DATA Cm", 1 ISO I.,17 M6 RAM► lT Al MUCEIDE (LIR 120A) Al AT pEECt:off (LIK 1211) 2 BA1 dT17 C! AAIIr TM AT MM17 a RAM► Ills im) 3 Mt1tAI CMC[CC(0! M TWj AT %WIT r WO (011K 1202) CUUMI ! O /7 a orF-YID A OlfO1DE S AA1� DQCslot f a Ir a orr•AAMr • OWN cllECslos 0 s or 17 MOW �r.4 • C C EC cwKs10E n s or 17 r som S COAT rlllte K1103 >ti 1t110G nl 141031 IO 0411M rA 1L1102 WO Tunic COAT RERORT a211M.REE 11/07/% ►." 1 RVORI Kqw; OREEESIOEM01? ■t VOL-1 VOL-2 VOL-3 VOL-4 VOL-3 VOL-4 VOL-? VOL-2 ROW am now sm L10Y Wow IpD. um L 1[ 011 M EtLT tWT R61RRU $$TOW RA17 Mnk t IIE Sit T071LL tV&KM" TOT-1 TOT-2 TOT-3 TOT-1 TOT 5 TOT-& TOT IIOR 31 17 sq 107 109 )tG :Y 116 3" .21 VA3 433 17.2 3.1 3.1 5.1 20.3 23.6 11 M 31 I6 612 ISM 113 4371I 07 %ft "? Sm 363b1 44" 15.5 2.2 L. 11.3 16.0 25.0 11 _ 711E 1 17 S" RS m 2"m fiff 630 M 3646 2OS2R 36/M 16.1 3.2 3.0 S. i 22.3 21.6 1 tut 116 S67 " In MY "I St7 4M1 6N 3w 662 13.6 2.5 3.4 9.7 17.9 26.6 13 1M 2 17 63111 1100 M SO7 747% 600 am 417 3257 607 10.6 3.4 2.9 9.4 22.0 20.9 2 mm 2 f6 311 1C 13OR 349 W Ino 41 {N 3"1 4" 16.1 2.7 3.5 6.5 16.8 u.7 12 Tow 317 A7 104 100 36Z 60 702 316 66 3t21 428 17.2 3.0 3.2 10.6 20.3 22.9 7 TIR1 .3 /6 SS" M 120 370 6SN 502 634 tM Sm 6O 15.4 2.7 1.3 10.3 16.2 2S.0 12 TKH 4716 7R0 on Zr" 3306 6634 Sm 3356 l"k R t op SRO A 111 34 m 431 i t YS 36% 11InIR1mR3 336 O M 27o 664 W IR aft 2352 3N IIYiawm) 637 110 130 437 747 RM 4" - 322 3m YS tt6.O_. 24.9 7.0 13.2 66.9 29.7 115.4 04.3 63.1 272.7 TREd koft, N Itnt e 6 1 , tnnlC aunt EE►OII 1+/oT/Va oF:Eo:37 SEFOAT FILL: ESC►S•1.AE► ma: MSCOM/dn►ISSI aft." u,d.r "W- .rtm KSRI►TIOM: EASCOM/CAI:►ISft IMTEES[CTtOA Iua CCRMTS SASCO:+ 11171EtAMM1CT SISTER CITY OF CAM►S1ll, J1SST rV TOM^ E WT TOM! SL1031 T0, WICT DATA CAL": 1 01"'V CwISSI as TM AT @AS= I SSLT dIN►ISSI B Ll AT SASL91 ! METERS, "$M A TEEV'E7 AT CJYVISSI a •LT &As= M LT At amiz 1 S YTr1 11"IM S1 TIN AT tNIPISSI A OLT TIAs= O LT AT CWISSI t ESLEA.E SS :1AVIEE IMMUCTI05 E 1[ST tl.IPISSI M of SAww S EIRT cAwi Rt 16 ITT AT "scm 10 METMM OD.IYMT MI TMRI/ET At BUM 11 MKT YSIV MT W LT AT 1AS0011 II pAI SA.SCON • 1T AT twissi ! tau+, FILES, 941031 FEW SL1101 na 961102 IRo 941103 TM' OLI104 FEI i TUFFIC COWT REPORT - ISM-R.RE► 11/07/94 rope 1 WPORT MAME: of,-, dryer ances "a%- VOL-1 TOL-2 VOL-3 VOL•L VOL-s V -A VOL-7 VOL -a VOL-0 VOL10 VOLII 1AOL12 so. now sm L W OA lot OTH&V Eall USTOM MLT YTOW OLT ULUtVT LEST M7 WIMIS LOLT UR1 TOTAL AVERAGE TOT-1 TO' Mm 31 17 its 37 1571 101 1>O2 12M 1877 0 2" 0 O 0 SW 705 2.2 POR 31 Is 146M "M IS" 02 Iota 103 DEL 0 &MA a 0 0 "70 su 2.2 i _ TOE 1 17 la 34 1SO1R a7R 1501 106 lob" 0 VAR a 0 0 s%i 69% 2.3 7 M 1 U m M 1S" M Tam 76 nm 0 92 0 0 a 4m a» - 2.0 ,t LED 21T IQ 2% is" K 1000 113 MID 0 tsa 0 0 0 S847 731 2.E 1 In 21a 127 32 1TSM 1101t 17TT 100 303 0 LA 0 0 0 K50 O20 2.0 t Tri 3 1T 125 A 1s11 1a0 VAN WIN 11,10 0 333 0 a 0 3507 700 2.2 t 7RL 3 10 1154 37 10414 1n IssT ITS 23L0 0 3" 0 0 a 0000 =a T.7 1 Total TO & US NRQ 7" uw 136 wool 0 2/00 0 0 0 4ms Awr-w :SL 35 ISO 100 100 105 2123 0 367 0 0 0 01/8 MiniYEO) 113 25 TSOt 97 1492 M Is" 0 Zh 0 0 0 3361 NS 1tirl�n(R) I" K 17% 119 ta70 126 2370 0 LK 0 0 0 0002 as aN.aRr. 0.3 6.1 43.0 9.1 140.6 10.0 216.7 0 34.2 0 0 0 40.0 T0t0t miler Of tim • a ruFFIC Omer, A 001/Otl2 7`a/u 12:07:5I 4E/0er PILE: wa..ar .of c44, 1wi: �t/PrtAMrAs0 ,+ � 0[satrnla: Msoov"gAgrAND IArusErnoA rlAu LVUMTS 0Asc0n INTERCONNECT srsm CIr1 OF tr MULL. irm PU 10/27/N: 0u'ml FA01, 911107 To, t„a, CITY OF CAMPBELL Public WoAs Gepa,tmcnt 2 M1A LAW: T INT P"IAW MIallrr Lr AT "CO, "T PWJKTAM Da"M eT AT AT AAS= A WILT "Scorn Y LT At Am- Otivawy S ATMRA Mt<01 >N Trat//t1 AT hIMrA,. ORfYAi/1f 2 MATT FILES: •41107 nor 941 is Tyr ft", wo • Po.T-lei a•na eu n.nsmi +rad m.*w �7+ •+.t10.• • 2 70 Noah Fi 51,.., GwvWl. (jh1o...a 9 e005 1473 tal 404. 066.'l1e0 as Mqoo P. t 2177 Te08.6N.21f0 3eFf V� "" .Tees (ao -c161 •ie<<ae$%rS6 r19u • _ .•..tee. 1 P16 uAIA SERVICE PAGE TWTIC DATA SERVICE PAK1 1 • am", nu. •AEmm 6orw4. vim ME. DAnru CFFPISI Nr I b by, Pr+-mry amp 11/IOHt F— RVren Iry East Frs 3eyN hw 1YWt RT 1MI Vo>•FeM LT Tool lFn aT YM LT rr TIP! LT RT 116R1 LT 3 R1 0 0 0 13 1 41 37 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 w a 78 3 0 0 a 13 2 36 26 26 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 M i3D 0 0 0 16 6 M 31 34 0 0 0 0 0 72 6 0 0 0 6 1 M 10 1S2 126 0 0 0 0 0 336 7TAL 0 0 0 .DADA 0 0 0 1{ S 33 21 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 Pi a T7 i 0 0 0 6 1 30 40 D a 0 0 0 0 0 K „) 0 0 0 • 2 31 13 4 M 35 0 C 0 0 0 is .k - 0 0 0 0 *1 12 160 129 0 0 0 0 0 ZD AK 0 0 t -VAL 0 0 0 M i2 202 2.1A 0 0 0 0 0 FEAR PERIOD ARALYSIS Fd TW PUUW' 4,00 FM - 6c00 R1 DIRECTIOR START FEPR ma ... ..... VOLu6S ........ R16Ft TNry Loft Teal .... PEKOM ... 6♦61+t 111ru 1iFt Fom PEAK 16RM FACTOR Prrm 12,00 Ph 0.00 0 0 100 0 t52 0 210 0 a 0 Ere 4.00 M 0." tb o rn slao 0 0 ywN S.ao PN 0.61 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r.t 3'00 Pm 0.00 EeN.n Imm ow lee 4.00 P14 0,00 0 0 0 162 a 210 o 23 0 6 0 72 E� 0.77 46 .0 0.•S 126 0 0 126 1100 0 0 6wN 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ire Fax Transmittal Memo nn _ e 2 ti TA,9r aWWa fft� ...•. �� y o ys �^ O OK,,- y, A•:xov Arcva a v..T.A5. w.. AW iA SE �.�. �_�.f�q•YSL r+ow u'y^ Durr 7LM�vtivf N�vCAw/+✓r v�i NLtfY f�[ •Lrt�wy `o c.MAisi S M!l{. �flb�0 yi✓ AMID tr.•p N✓ 77N[ w�•HL ea 40 . • OW •x. o••a M •ram•. !AI.1 •114 •O• �r � •ram. •w �"�s •vu n/w•1 •ItCnp1 a t1 iM a ....... 1QY0 ........ r01 ew �M haft 1y. t1•h t•r1 •••. �t ••• •1sk wq 1!e �.• um w ao • • • • • • • � ao w an • w u! to a t n •rr ro a•1 L• • • >• t1t• • • .�.� •.Om 111 L00 • • • • • • • L.n.. I.r.r.r �71 •r•D A lop • • • • t • • s� o.n •• a �v t,e a • tt ao ut • • u no t • fASC011 AVl. w � I 0 I p I ch"ISI 210 10 L 152 1 0 I 0/: 0 J r 126 I OI OI 126 1 WCOM AVi. TRAFFIC DATA SMILE IRO[: 1 • a"* : ►ILE: WAMV . Oprt: SAMM AVE. : tt.•Rt: CwvISI ORIE: 11/10/Ot .Mt Nr Irtb b: pm—y Fiat R•rth F e Est F— SrM F � Mmt YA111e1• • THOULt R rlRu LT IT TA! LT Rf TNI IT Toul 1+R Rr EE) 111 p 0 a 13 1 01 37 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 a W 10 0 0 0 13 2 I» 20 2< 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 10 i • t K 31 at 0 0 0 0 0 7L p ttRK 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 10 132 1. 0 0 0 0 0 SiS ,m ON o 0 0 1. s 33 ?7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 n It, 0 0 i 1 S .0 a 0 o 0 0 0 0 o x >p o 0 0 s : r MIRL 0 0 0 41 1s 1.0 1 0 0 0 • 0 � W AL 0 0 0 N a 292 255 0 0 0 0 0 b IU[ KRIOD MMLKIS FOR Tw FWM 0100 IM _ 0100 1M 010=104 START PE" M FACTOR ........ tOJFES ........ Rtpltt T11ry Lot T•ta1 .... FERm11S ... aloft Tww Lift FROM FEAR "MA Nomh 12100 M, p,M 0 0 0 0 0 Est Af 00 FM 0.71 N 100 lit 2100 . i A SWN 1600 FP 0.01 12F 0 0 12f 110D 0 0 ot tr S100 R1 a.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ewtln tobrostttn IwM 4.0D M 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ern 0.77 N 10 19 210 27 $ 72 solo 0.85 126 0 0 126 Moo 0 0 Not 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1999 S. BASCOM AVE. S 97-20/UP 97-11 6 OF 6 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLAN. ENVIRONMENTAL UOCS. 12/99 r i� r 1 � 1 ' \\ npfWM+ ITv 1i �\ Y --�--� " cl r �-rl W ~ y Z 0 O^ U O Cu F � M � Ja� W� t�l;nlilttiN i a 0 Q c Z � ? � JL Joo }_�--- W aL �a a - U Y CYIV % . t CAPSSf WORKSHEET Interaection: SALMAR 5 HWY 17 & HAMILTON Agency__ CRY OF CAMPBELL Condition: PM Fie Name: Imo©oomo; Traffic Volumes (VPH) E•EXISTNG A•APPROVED P•PRO.ECT FGeFLITURE GROWTH Scenario I: E 239-. C I 10C 3'5 1121 I 949 1599 19• 0 0 67 466 Scenario 2 : E•A 2"e cc 396 r12+ j 256 1600 194 0 0 67 166 Scenario 3 : EEA-P - 39C 1135 1 956 1602 t94 0 0 67 466 Scenario a E•A.P.FO 2.,91 '0 40+ n•6 96B 1621 196 0 1 0 1 a •7• batvatlon Flow Rate (VPH) Lost TYm (Second•) 2 2 2 - 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 Aart•turn Time (Seconds) Propau Adjust. Faetbr(PAF) C' 61 1 00� F 001+ 0011.00 0.61,1.00 0.6t 1.001.00 1.00 OPTIMUM CYCLE TIME :,REQUIRED CYCLE THE ,,PREDETERMMD CYCLE TIME: p ALL Remarks' cesaneow e,71 Va4Mi 1Cho••rc ISupp• P 1 ?— u Lost Ttwe_TOw 1 Ytt• Sec 2 2 T 5 w - n 1750 bat. Flow - 2 Lan Lana (VPHG) 3500 t. Fbw - 1 Thu are (VPHW 1600 Set. Flow - 1 Rlohl Lane (VPMG) ~ 1500 CAPSSI WURKSHEET htersection CREEKSIDE 3 HPJALTON I Agency: CITY OF CAMFBELL Condtion PM �FLIsNamne: EASTBOUND SOUTFBOLNCI WESTBOUND NORTHBOLM . _.. �. ,n,.., 1. .« M" ITMI I Lott Agm pwu I Lan Phasing f 2 x x x x x 3 4 5 8 Nltmber of Lanes ! 0 1 0 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 1 Traffic Vokirn9s (VPH) EXISTNG A•APPROVED P.pROJECT FWUTURE GROWTH gc.nvb 1: E '^�', 0 232 0 0 0 t692 S6 0 0 620 300 62P 300 se.nn,o 2: EA 2267 0 239 0 0 0 t692 56 0 0 0 623 300 scono 3 : E•A•P wr 2300 0 242 c 0 0 0 t903 S6 t926 37 0 0 0 632 304 Sean.rio 4 : E•A•P•F3 2J2� 0 2�5 0 0 Se Ovation Flow Role (VPH) ' 2 2 2 2 2 Lost Time (g.conM) _ 2 2 Mw*ryxn TWO (SOCOnds) 00 1 00 ' 00 1 00 L0p 1 00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 Progress AdW.t. F.ctdr(PAF) � OPTPAN CYCLE THE -- i OREOUIRED CYCLE TME: OPREDETERMNED CYCLE T** — 0 ALL: I I Remarks — ----� .— � f— atipn 0, Pa.k PsrbQ 2 T Sat, FlowL.K tw (V _ f PI) K' f7S0 Sat. Flow - 2 LNt Lane (VPH 3500 t. Fbw - 1 Thu. Lone -IV")�� 1a00 sat. Fbw - 1 Low (VPHG) CAPSSI WORKSHEET Intersection: BASCOM 3 HAMLTON Agency: CITY OF CAMPBELL Cordtion PM File Noes. M113 �=3 ME== mm� -ry ¢nir m I= MCIVIT61 Scenario 1: E mm� -ry ¢nir m I= MCIVIT61 Scenario 1: E •593 5�9 561 " 11 �41 523 925 Y2 tD. tOt. 562 349 Scowio 2 : E•A 1607 55' 56• t's0 ��6 523 925 315 187 1023 562 3N Scomrlo 3 : F•A-P t607 55, 577 1153 448 523 925 319 187 1042 573 351 9conWV • : E•AM•FG t626 55D 56� tt67 BS 529 9]6 323 1e9 105, SDO 755 Snvnlon Flow Ane (VPH) Lon Tin* (S*eona) ` 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1Arimrrn Tlrm (Socon0s) Pro rrn Adjust Frlctor(PAF] �.00'_OQ i.00 t.00 LQQ LOQ 1.QQ1.QQ 1.QQ 1.Q LQQ LQQ OPTIMUM CYCLE TIE ftEOUIRED CYCLE TIME: (PPMETEPK&ED CYCLE TIE: R marks: m m CAPSSI WORKSHEET htersectiom BASCOM 11 CAMPISI Agency: CITY OF CAMPBELL t Condition: PM FN Nwm: - _a . . :. T—ff- Vnh— rvP411 F.FYRTNUe' •.APPiinvpn P.Pan-Fr.T Fra.RMBW M()WTN Scenorb 1 : E 126 .0 1 372 ta51 96 1 28 10 152 -6 —2A�126Soarlarb 2 : E+A 129 - }�:ta60 96 26 n 156 .6 1451Ooena b 9 ' EMI 25 }76 ta90 96 2a t 56 .a 1N3scenario 4: E•A.P.FO t}''J82 t9tJ 97 2a tt 15e 42 1502 Satvation Flow Rate (VPH) Lost Ttn1s (Seconds) I T-2-F-2-1 ' 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 sar*'— Tyne (Seconds) I o eat Ad"I. Factor(PAF) . 00 li Doll Doll DD 1 00.t O,)I1 00 1 ppt oo 1 OD OPTIMUM CYCLE TIME: !>REOLIRED CYCLE TIME: JPREDETERMP€D CYCLE TIME ✓ALL Remarks: —i '0T trfecagneow/Mh 1 V s Chosen ISumst: gl.atbn OI Peak n IS st Ttma Second2 Mrinsr<n TMs (Seconds) — 5 1600 BASCOM d PRUNEYARD Agency: CITY OF CAMPBELL Cortdtion PM Fie Name: CAPSSI WORKSHEET I MEN Traffic VoAmtes (VPIO E•EXISTNG A■APPROVED P•PRO,ECT FQWLrnllE GROWN( I I OPTMUM CYCLE TIME: )REOURED CYCLE TIME: OPREDETERMP ED CYCLE TW BALL:— Rartwrks: �.s� �. (.t,t , ?� �111 purstion f r t Ttne Second Thr (Seconds) Lane (VPFIG).--- 17SO am Fbw - 2 Left Lan• (VPf1G) 35M t Flow -1 t_ bat. Flo- - 1 Lair (VPHG) 1500 intersection: �22 #22#2 tloanafb 1: E 0 T59 7+ +•92 0 26• 0 0 0 t• t06 0 SC•IWiO 2 E•A O 259 7+ +90� 0 26• 0 0 0 t•!9 106 0 $Canarb 9 E•A•P 0 296 75 +905 0 275 0 0 0 +•] 106 0 ScMrrb � : E•A•P•FG C 299 76 +92E 0 I 270 0 0 0 t•56 107 0 11etV•tbn Flow F4t• (VPH) Lost Ttm• (Second*) _ L ' CAPSSI WORKSHEE'f kltarasction: BASCOM d CAMPBELL A enc . CITY OF CAMPBELL Condition: PM Fls W.-: �® mom=©©© Traffic Vnkmma WMA r owaTman •_.e .- Sewado 1 : E101�619 15531 129 497 045 3D D25 31029Sworl0 2 : E•A `_5J' 129 SO 0 45 30 D2D�31'2 1 29 Scenario 3 : E•A4P6J: - 157C'� 1-2 510 0 45 JD D2D 29Scowlo 4 : E•A4P4F0639 5 1569 141 116 0 46 39 D3D6 30 Satva"m Flow Rate (VPM) Lost Tema (Seconds) 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Tkft (Seconde) J20sa*mmi Pro ess Aftat. Faccr(PAF) ' OG' 0 5 '00 1 00l1.00 1 001 00 1001001.00 OPTIMUM CYCLE TIME ')REQUIRED CYCLE TIME _ OPREDETERMIPED CYCLE TIME: ALL Remarks: 2 s CAPSSI WORKSHEET Intersection CAMPBELL b UNION Agency: CITY OF CAMPBELL Condition PM Fie Name: j EASTBOUND I SOUTHBOUND I WESTBOUND I NORTHBOUND TLeft RVa Thu Lett lFbght ThLottL.Riyru N TtLeft IRWM Pftasttp Sequence hu 2 x x x 3 x x x a s 6 Number of Lanes I 0 1 t lo 70 0 12 t 0 1 0 2 S Traffic Volumes (VPH) E-EXISTING A■APPROVED P-PROJECT FG-FUTURE GROWTH Scenario 1: E 1128 926 C C 0 773 261 0 0 497 156 Scenario 2 ' E-A np• 9J: C , C 0 769 261 0 0 496 166 Scerano 3 : E•A-P 1161 1 1 93: 1 C C 0 805 264 0 0 695 171 Scenario 4. E•AM-FG 943 1 C C 0 614 267 0 0 504 173 Setvatlon Fbw Rate (VPH) Lost Tt719 (S9COPdt) 2 - 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mfmmun Time 'Seconds) Progress Adjuel Fr-tor(PAF) ' 00 t 001.00 1 OO t . 0011 .00 t . 00 t .00 1.00 t .0 1.00 1.00 OOPTMUM CYCLE TIME: OREOURED CYCLE THE OPREDETERMINED CYCLE T& —_ OALL Remarks: c99a V a+o..n ISuppeet: , ,1 fP 9f P 15 Oat TYn9(Seconds) 2 b wwri Tlme Seconds 5 1750 i Sat. Flow - 2 Lon Lars VPHG) 1 3500 t. w-1Th 1900 Set. Fbw - 1 Lars (VPHG) 1600 _ — - e CAPSSI WORKSHEET Intersection: CREEKSIDE & HWY 17 NB Agency: CITY OF CAMPBELL Condtion: PM Fie Nam: Traffic Vokmea (VPH) E-EXIST".+t : A•APPROVED PO,ECT FG-FUTURE GROWTH Scomrio 1: E 0 $69 92 357 0 0 0 0 0P498 00Scwmft 2: E•A 0 569 92 !Sa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Scerwio 3: E•A-P o 569 97 !6+ 0 0 0 0 0 o Soanerio 4: E•AM-F'G o 576 se !a5 0 0 0 0 0 o o Setwetion Fbw Rat. (VPH) Lost Time (S.conds) - 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 mrin..n Two (Secmft) Pr as Ad"t. Fector(PAF) 1.OQ 1 OD 1.00 1 QQ 1.QQ 1.00 1.001.00 1.QQ 1.0 1.00 1.00 OPTMLM CYCLE THE ,P.EOL)RED CYCLE TIME .,PREDETERMINEDj"CYCLE TIME: " Remarks: -- _ — —Ad �I t. V.�,.. �� e� of Peak P I 111 Lost "Tine Se Dods 2 6 nso Set. flow - 2 Un LaM (VPMG) I 3St10 w - 1 Illat Bm tA00 Sat. Flo. - 1 Larr (VP11G) 7500 Duration C A P S S I 11-21-94 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY of CAMPBELL EXISTING SOLUTION USING PREDETERMINED CYCLE TIMES FLN:hamsal HAMILTON i SALMAR/SB HNY 17 OFF P.M Peak Hour Scenario 1 Movement EBT EBL IRA SIT ■BL BBR NBT NSL NOR ' MST NBL NBR Phase 1 - 17 Dees X Y Y Phase 2 - 60 sees Y Y X . Phase 3 - 56 sees X Y Y Phase 4 - 25 ■Dee X I Phase 5 - 0 goes PhaP• 6 - 0 mace Cziticrl Mvmt-••I •••• I .•.• I ••.• I •..• Peak 15 Vol -vph 2100 400 1121 375 649 1599 194 61 466 Saturation -vph 5700 1750 5250 Shrd 1750 5700 1750 1750 17SO Lost Lima -sec 2.00 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Relative Sat 'X' 1.00 0.62 0.83 - 1.09 O.S9 1.17 0.26 1.0E Effective Gr-sec 58 SB S4 - S4 75 15 23 40 Move Time -See 60 60 56 - 56 77 17 25 42 Min/Ped Time -sec 20 20 20 - 20 2C 10 10 10 Prog Factor PAY 0.61 0.61 1.00 - 2.00 0.61 0.61 1.00 2.00 AvDelay/veh -sec 33 20 39 - 97 14 112 46 94 Level of Service D C. D- - F S- l E l Av.'Q•/ lane veh 12 7 14 - 21 7 6 3 16 Vah Stopping a 61 SO 92 - 100 45 62 89 100 Do Veh Clear YES YES YES - NO YES YES YES NO »» I Intersection Oversaturated - Delay Values Not Meaningfull «<c Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sae) . 42 Leval of Service • E+ Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (see) . SB Level of Service • E- - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) . 1.05 Predatermined Cycle Length in 158 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway Capacity Manual C A P 1 5 I 11-21-90 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM PON A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CANPSZLL E ' APPROVED SOLUTION USING PREDETERMINED CYCLE TIMES FLN�hameal HAMILTON i SALMAR/58 WAY 17 OFF P.M Peak Hour Scenario Movement CRT ZBL BUR SET SBL SER NET (IBL HER MET MBL NBF Phase 1 - 17 Seca I I I Phase 2 - S9 sees I I I Phase 3 - 57 saes I I I Phase 1 - 2S sees I C Phase S - 0 sees Phase 6 - 0 sees Critical M••mt ... •••• •••• •••• "'• Peak 15 Vol -vph 2118 400 2221 396 656 2600 196 67 661 Saturation -vph 5700 1750 S2SO Shrd 1750 5700 1750 17SO 176( Lost time -sae 2.00 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.0( Relative Sat 'E• 1.03 0.63 0.83 - 1.08 0.60 1.27 0.26 1.04 Zffeetivo Or-ooc 57 57 SS - SS 74 15 23 6( Move Time -Sec 59 S9 57 - 57 76 17 25 6: Min/Pod Time -sac 20 20 20 - 20 20 30 30 1( Frog Factor PAT 0.61 0.61 1.00 - 1.00 0.62 0.62 1.00 1.0( AvDelay/vah -sac 38 20 38 - 93 15 122 66 9C Level of Service D- C- D- - F a- F ,C F Av.•Q•/ lane vah 12 7 14 - 21 a 6 3 V Von Stopping a 62 51 92 - 100 IS 62 69 10C Do Veh Clear 7 YES YZS YES - NO YES YES YES N[ »» Intersection Overeaturated - Delay Values Not Meaningfull «« Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sae) a 63 Level of Service a Z+ Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (see) a 60 Level of Service - F •• •• - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (ICU) - 2.06 Predetermined Cycle Length is ASS seconds (A1l Minimum times are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1965 Highway Capacity Manual 0 C A P S S I 11-21-94 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALISED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL E a A ♦ PROJECT SOLUTION USING PREDETERMINED CYCLE TIMES FUIMILTON 6 EALMAR/SB HIWY 17 OPP PLM:ha"al P.M Peak Hour Scenario 3 Movement EST EBL SON SET SIL SEA NOT Mal. NOR HET MEL MDR Phase 1 - 1S gees E I Phase 2 - 59 seem E E I ' E Phase 3 - S7 gees E E E Phase 6 - 25 mace Phase 5 - 0 Seca E I Phase 6 - 0 saes ' Critical Mvmt-••I •••• I ••.• ( I .••• Peak 15 Vol -vph 2220 600 1135 396 6S6 1602 196 67 • .. 66s Saturation -vph 5700 1750 5250 Shrd 1750 5700 17SO 1750 1790 Lost time -see 2.00 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Relative Sat •E' 1.04 0.64 0.84 - 1.0E 0.60 1.20 0.26 1.06 Effective Gr-sec 57 57 55 - 55 75 16 23 61 No: Time -age No:Min/Pad 59 S9 57 - 57 77 le 25 63 Time - TLna-sac 20 20 20 - 20 20 10 10 10 Frog Factor PAY 0.61 0.61 1.00 - 1.00 0.61 0.62 2.00 2.00 AvDelay/veh -sac 39 21 39 - 97 la 99 66 at Level of Service D- C_ D_ - F N- P Av.•Q•/ lane vah 13 7 15 - 21 E 5 E F Veh Stopping a 62 51 92 - 100 IS 62 3 s9 16 100 Do Vah Clear 7 YES YES YES - MO YES YES YES No »» I Intersection Oversaturated - Delay Valuca Not Neaningfull Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (see) . 63 Level of Service . S+ Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (sec) . " 60 Level of Service . E- - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) . 1.06 Predetermined Cycle Length is 1S9 seconds (All Minimmus time are Satisfied) • CAPSSI (ReleaSe 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 2925 Highwa;-apacity Manual C A P S S I 11-21-94 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL E + A . P + FUTURE GROWTH SOLUTION USING PREDETERMINED CYCLE TIMES FLNshameal HAMILTON 6 SALMAR/SR HWY 17 OFF P.M Peak Hour Scenario • Movement EDT ERL ESR SET SSL SSR W8T NOL WSR MST NRL NOR Phase 1 - 17 mace Z Z I Phase 2 - 59 *see I I I Phase 3 - 57 seen Z I I Phase • - 25 seem E E Phase S - 0 sacs Phase 6 - O sacs Critical Mvmt ... •••• •••• •••• e•ee Peak 1S Vol -vph 21.9 401 21.8 402 668 1622 196 66 474 Saturation -vph 5700 1750 5250 Shrd 1750 5700 17SO 17SO 1750 Lost time -sac 2.00 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Relative Sat 'I' 1.05 0.64 0.85 - 1.10 0.62 1.10 0.27 2.07 Effective Or -sec 57 S7 SS - 55 74 1s 23 40 Move Ties -sae 59 59 57 - 57 76 17 2S 42 Min/Pad Time-aec 20 20 20 - 20 20 to 10 10 Frog Factor PAY 0.61 0.61 1.00 - 1.00 0.62 0.61 2.00 1.00 AvDelay/vah -sec 41 20 39 - 202 1S 116 46 201 Level of Service E. C- D- - P O- F E P Av.40 / Lana veh 13 7 1S - 21 a 6 3 17 Vah Stopping % 63 51 92 - 100 45 62 89 100 Do Veh Clear 7 YES YES YES - NO YES YES YES No »» Intersection Oversaturated - Delay Values Not Heaningfull «« Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sac) - •S Level Of Service v 3 Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (see) - 6S Level Of Service . IF " - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (ICU) - 1.08 Predetermined Cycle Length is 158 seconds (All Minimum time are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 21) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway capacity Manual C A P S S 1 11-1a-96 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY or CAMPBELL EEISTING SOLUTION USING RDQUIRDD CYCLE TIME FLNt hascri RAMILTOM 6 CREERSIDI P.M Peak Hour scenario Movement DDT ESL DDR SET SBL aDR MRT NHL MDR MDT MBL n Phase I - 10 Gees I I Phase 2 - 27 sacs I x : Phase 3 - 12 sees I Phase a - 0 sec. Phase 5 - 0 sees Phase 6 - 0 macs Critical Mvmt-•• •••• •••• •• 620 3 Peak 15 Vol -vph i771 236 I012 S6 saturation -vph 5700 1750 5700 27SO S250 17 Lost ties -sae 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2. Relative Sat 'I• 0.76 0.27 0.46 0.20 0.id 0. Effective Or -see 25 25 3S 6 10 Have Time -sec 27 27 37 10 12 Min/Pod Time -see 20 20 20 10 10 Frog Factor PAP 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. AvDelay/vsh -sac s 5 2 14 16 Level Of Service a• a. A a- B Av.•Q•/ lane veh 5 2 2 1 2 Vsh stopping 6 al S7 13 66 PO Do Vah Clear 7 YES YES YES YES YDS Y '!!tole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (woe) • s Level of Service v A+ Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (see) a 10 Leval of Service - a- •• •• - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (ICU) - 0.69 Required Cycle Length is 69 seconds (All Minimum tL 8 'are satisfied) • CAPaSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1965 Highway Capacity Manual C A P S S 1 II-16-9♦ OOMPRENINSIVI ANALYSIS ►ROGRAM FOR A SINGLI BIGNALIZID INTSRSICTION CITY Or CAMPSILL I ♦ APPROVED SOLUTION USING RIQUIRID CYCLS TINT HAMILTON 6 CREIRSIDI P.M Peak Hour FLMohamcrs Scenario 2 Movement EST EBL ESR SST SSL 6SR MMT WRL MMH MHT EEL ESP Phase 1 - 10 Nee I I , Phase 2 - 27 Nee I I I Phase 3 - 12 sees I I Phase 6 - 0 sees Phase 5 - 0 Nee Phase 6 - 0 seen Critical Nvmt-••I •••• I I .... Peak 1S Vol -vph 2257 239 2892 56 621 30C Saturation -vph 5700 17SO 5700 1750 $250 175C Lost time -see 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.0C Relative Sat 'I' 0.79 0.27 0.46 0.20 0.66 0.04 Effeetive Or-eee 25 2S 3S 6 10 it Have Time -sec 27 27 37 10 12 32 Nin/Pod TLr-see 20 20 20 10 10 It Pr09 Factor TAT 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.0C AvDslay/veh -see 9 5 2 la 16 25 Level of Service a• B. A S- B- 04 Av.'Q'/ lane vsh 5 2 2 1 2 3 Vah Stopping 9 62 57 63 66 90 96 Do Veh Clear 7 YEa rail YEa YES YES YES Whole Intersecticn - Weighted Av Delay lose) . S Level of Service . SN Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (See) . 11 Level of Service v 5- - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) . 0.69 Required Cycle Langth is 69 seconds (All Minimus time are Satisfied) • CAPaSI (Release 12) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1965 H19hgy Capacity Manual C A P S S I COMPREHENSIVE AMALYSIS PROGRAM 11-16-94 FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAHPSELL Z • A . PROJECT SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME RAMILTON 6 CRiERSIDS A.N Peak Hour FLMthamcre Scenario Movement EaT Phase 1 - 10 goes•� EaL EaR SST SBL Ma'" MaL MSR Phase 2 - 23 sees E an = I NHL Hat Phase 3 - 12 Ices Z I Phase 4 - 0 sec• Phase S - 0 sees E z Phase 6 - 0 goes Critical Mvmt-••I .•.. I I I Peak 15 Vol -,ph 2300 362 •••• Saturation -vph 5700 Lost time -gee 0.00 1750 1903 56 5700 1750 611 2S 300 Relative fat •E• 0.71 2 00 0.30 0.00 2.00 S6 0.00 1750 Effective Or -see 23 21 0.66 0.16 0.65 2.00 0.77 Move Time -see 23 Min/Pod Time-e•c 20 23 33 S 33 10 12 10 Frog Factor PAF 1.00 20 20 10 1.00 12 10 10 10 AvDela Y/vsh vice S of 1.20 1.10 6 2 1.00 1.00 Av-*QLevel a. lansere Av.•Q'/ lane vsh S a. 12 A B- 41 19 Veh stopping a S2 2 2 l a- r Do Veh Clear 742 y 62 �0 40 as YES 2 93 3 �I Las I_ I Y In f6 rn Whole Intersection I�'—� (Re) Critical Movements - Weighted Av DelaDelay • 7 Level of Service . y(goo) S. 9 Level of Service . - Int•rs•ction Capacity Utilisation (ICU) . a. 0.67 Required Cycle Length is 45 second• (All Minimum • CAPSSI times are satisfied) (Rol"" 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 19SS Highway Capacity Manual C A P S S I ll-3S-91 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPULL E . A . P ♦ FUTURE OPAMM SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME HAMILTON 6 CREERSIDE FLNthanere A.M Peak Mour Scenario Movement EMT EEL EER SST SEL SSR MST WSL WWER MST NSL 11 Phase I - 10 Nee E E "use 2 - 27 seen E E E . Phase 3 - 12 sacs Phase 4 - 0 seea E ) Phase S - 0 sees . Phase 6 - 0 secs . Critical Mvmt-••I •••• I I ••.. I Peak 15 Vol -vph 2327 245 1926 57 tl2 ��. �i, Saturation -vph 5700 1750 5700 1750 5260 17, Lost time -see 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.�i, Relative Sat IS, 0.80 0. 2? 0.47 0.20 0.59 0:: Effective or -see 25 25 35 a Move Time -see 27 27 37 10 10 12 Min/Ped Time -see 20 20 20 10 Frog Factor PAP 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 1.00 1. AvDelay/veh -see 9 5 2 14 Level of Service a. a. E_ 14 Av.'Q'/ lane veh 5 2 ^ 2 1 S- Veh Stopping a 83 57 43 96 2 90 Do Veh Clear 7 YES YES YES n5 YES E Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sec) . S Level of service S+ Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (see) . 11 Level of Nrvles . S- - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (ICU) . 0.70 Required Cycle Length is 49 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) • CRPSSI (Release 22) - Nsed an Delay Methodology Per 1955 Highway Capacity Manual C A P S S I 11-15-94 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALISED INTERSECTION EXISTING SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME PLNthambas HAMILTON 6 BASCOM P.M Peak Hour Scenario 1 Movement EST EBL ZBR SHT SEL SBR NBT WRL WWBR NBT NIL NBT Phase 1- 30 Dees Z x x E Phase 2- 6 sees Z I x x ' Phase 3- 20 Dees Z Z Z x Phase 4- 12 once x x Z x Phase 5- 3 sees x x x x Phase 6- 20 sees x Z I•••' I X E Critical MVmt-••I Peak 15 Vol -vph •••• 1593 549 564 1174 448$23 925 •••• 712 244 1014 •••• f62 346 Saturation -vph 5700 3500 2600 5700 3SO0 1600 5700 3S00 1600 $700 3500 ISM Lost time -sec 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.0t Relative Set •I• 0.S3 O.SO 0.64 0.78 0.92 0.60 0.64 0.79 0.27 0.60 0.88 O.St Effective Or -Doc 24 14 39 if 30 34 is a 30 21 13 23 Move Time -See 26 16 41 20 12 36 20 10 32 23 15 22 Min/Ped Time -see 20 10 `0 20 10 20 20 10 20 20 10 2t Prog Factor PAP 2.00 1.00 0 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.0c AvDelay/veh -see 19 25 .0 21 38 13 19 31 30 17 31 13 Level of Service C. D. a• C- D- a- C. D a- C. D Av.•Q•/ lane veh 7 • 5 6 4 5 5 3 2 5 f 4 Veh Stopping 4 92 95 70 93 99 77 89 97 GS 86 97 71 Do Von Clear T YES YES YES YES YES YES YES TES TES YES YES TV Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (Dee) • 20 Level of Service a C+ Critical movements - Weighted Av Delay (see) - 22 Level of Service - C- •• •• - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (ICU) - 0.82 Required Cycle Length is 71 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay methodology Per 2963 Nighray Capacity Manual C A P 5 S 1 11-19-94 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION E + APPROVED SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME rLNthambas HAMILTON S BASCOM P.M Peak Hour Scenario Movement EST ESL ESR SST SBL SHR NET WWSL MIN NET MEL NHl Phase 1- 30 sacs X X I I Phase 2- 6 sacs I I X I Phase 3- 20 men X I X I ' Phase 6- 12 sees I X I X - Phase S- 3 sees - X I X I Phase 6- 20 sees X I X I Critical Nvmt-•• •••• •••• •••• •••• Peak 15 Vol -vph 1607 551 564 1160 III 523 925 315 187 2023 S62 31' Saturation -vph 5700 3500 1600 5700 3500 1600 5700 3500 1600 5700 3500 160( Lost time -sae 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.01 Relative Sat •X• O.83 0.S0 0.66 0.79 0.92 0.6E 0.66 0.80 0.26 0.61 0.86 O.S( Effective Or -sec 26 16 39 is 30 36 is B 30 21 13 3. Have Time -sac 26 16 61 20 12 36 20 10 32 23 15 3: Min/Pod Time -see 20 10 20 20 10 20 20 10 20 20 10 21 Prog Fsctor PAP 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 "0( AvDelay/veh -sac 19 2S 30 21 38 13 19 31 30 17 31 1: Level of Service C. D+ B+ C- D- a- C+ D I- C+ D Av.•Q'/ lane vah 7 6 5 6 6 S 5 3 2 S 5 Veh Stopping t 92 9S 70 93 99 77 89 98 65 86 97 7: Do Veh Clear 7 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES !a: Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay Jose) - 20 Level of Service - C- Critical Movements - weighted Av Delay (see) - 22 Level of Service - C- •• •• - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (ICU) a O.I3 Required Cycle Length is 71 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) • CAPBSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1995 Highway Capacity Manuel C A P S 5 1 11-1B-9a COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION E ♦ A ♦ PROTECT SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME TLN : hembas HAMILTON 6 NASCOM P.M Peak Hour Scenario Movement EST ESL ESR SET SSL SSR MST WSL WaR NST IML NST Phase 1- 30 Sees I I I I Phase 2- 5 once E E I I Phase 3- 20 secs I I I I . Phase • - 12 sees E I I I I I Z Phase 5- 3 secs I I Phase 6- 20 secs I I I I Critical Mvmt-•• peak 15 Vol -vph •••• 1607 S51 577 " " 1153 448 523 925 •�•� 319 167 1042 •••• S73 3f: faturation -vph 5700 3500 1600 5700 3500 1600 5700 3500 1600 5700 3500 160( Lo.t time -Sec 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.O( Relative Sat 'I' D.a6 0.aS 0.66 0.79 0.90 0.69 0.63 0.80 0.27 0.61 0.88 0.5( E:!eetive Gr-sec 23 13 38 18 10 33 18 8 30 21 13 IS 33 31 Mow Time -see 25 15 40 20 12 3S 20 10 32 23 20 10 2( Min/Pod Tier -see 20 10 20 1.00 20 10 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 20 1.00 10 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 " 00 1.0( Frog Factor PAT 1.00 1.00 28 10 20 36 13 IS 30 10 16 31 11 AvDalay/veh -see 20 D- a- C. D a♦ C. D P Level of Service C. D. a- C- 2 5 S < Av.•Q'/ lane veh 7 • 5 6 • S 79 • 89 3 97 65 86 97 71 Vah Stopping 6 94 97 71 YES YES 93 98 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES TEI Do Vah Clear 7 YES I Whole Intersection - weighted Av Delay (see) . 20 Level of Service m C- Critical Movement. - weighted Av Delay (Sac) . 23 Level of Service - C- •• •' - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (Ica) - 0.83 Required Cycle Length is 70 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Besed on Delay Methodology Per 19aS Highway Capacity Manual C A P S S I 13-18-9� COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ' E • A • P • FUTURE GROWTH SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME FLN:hamEDS P.M Peak Hour Scenario HAMILTON 6 BASCOM Movement EST EHL ESR SST SSL see MHT VOL NOR KBT W' A Phase I - 10 .Sea x x Phase 2- 6 sees x x x S x Phase 3 - 20 seen x x : • x Phase s - 13 coca x : x s 1 Pee S ) seen x - - x l Phasexase 6 - 20 saes I x Critical Most-•• Peak 15 Vol -vph •"• 1626 558 584 1167 453 529 936 noon 323 189 •a•• 3056 500 3500 3 16 Saturation -vph 5700 3500 1600 5700 3500 2600 5700 2.00 3500 1600 2.00 2.00 5700 2.00 2.00 2. Lost tier -see 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.85 0.70 0.66 0.83 0.27 0.63 0.85 0. Relative Sat 'x' 0.86 0.82 0.66 0.82 36 18 a 31 21 16 Effective Gr-see 24 14 40 1S 11 20 13 36 20 10 33 23 16 Move TLas -Dec 26 16 12 10 20 20 10 20 20 10 20 20 10 Min/Ped TL•e-see 20 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 1. Prog Factor PAY 20 27 30 26 AvDelay/veh -see C2 D1 e9 S D B- C. Level of Service C. D. 6 5 7 2 5 B AV.'Q'/ lane veh 7 1 5 6 9/ 97 79 90 9a 65 87 97 van Stopping % 93 96 70 YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES TES Do Veh Clear 7 YES YES I I ' Whole Int•rsection - Weighted Av Delay (see) - 20 Level of Service - C- Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (see) - 23 Level of Service - C- •• •• - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (ICU) Required Cycle Length is 72 seconds (All Minissm times are satisfied) Delay Methodology Per JOBS Highway Capacity Manual • CAPSSI (Releass 11) - Based on N 11-18-91 C A P S S I COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED !MTERSLCTION CITY OF CAHPSELL EXISTING SOLUTION USING REQUIRtD CYCLE TIME rim ,Wep's P.M Peak Hour Scenario NASCOM i CAMPISSI ENT ESL ESR SST SSL SSR WNT WBL WNa NNi W Movement X X . Phase 1- 20 secs I X E X Phase 2 - 10 SOCO I E ' Phase 3 - 10 face X E X ) phase 4 - 32 teem Phase S - 0 *see Phase 6- 0 face I I I Critical Mvmt-••I Peak 15 VO1 -vph 40 ••10 1 1S2 IS 12S •772 1f 51 96 2S hrd 3600 Shrd S000 •a•• 99 I 1750 2� At Saturation -,ph 3500 Shrd 17S0 S700 1750 Shrd 2.00 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 _ 270700 - Lost time -sac 2.00 - _ - O.SS 0.79 0.49 - O.S2 0.66 O.fl s fat 0.is is 30 N - N _ - 30 se Lffeetive Gr-sec Effective - 10 _ - 20 32 i0 - 32 10 Move Time -see Min/Pod 'f iaN-sec 20 20 10 - _ - - 30 10 10 - 30 1•24 - _ 10 10 - 1.010 1.00 ' Prog rector PAY 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 - - - 15 2S - 17, 2S AvDelay/vsh -sac 16 - 30 C. C- pa C- C- Uvel of Service C. - 7 2 _ 2 _ - 6 2 Av.•0'/ lane veh 1 6 95 87 94 - 94 - - s0 94 Veh Stopping \ 79 - YES YES YES - YES - - YES YES Jo Veh Cls\r ] I YES - Whole Intersection - weighted Av Delay (Sec) - 17 Level of Service ' C+ is Level of sei-Lan . C+ Critical Movements- Weighted Av Delay (sae) ' Utilaaation (ICO) 0•74 . •• - Intersection Capacity Minimum times are satisfied) Required Cycle Length i/ 72 seconds (All on Delay Methodology Per 1Ps5 Highway Capacity Manuel • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Named 13 C A P 5 5 I 11-1N-96 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALISED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL EXISTING SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME PLNtbaspiS BASCOM 6 CAMPISSI P.M Peak Hour Scenario 2 Movement EST EEL SEA BUT SUL NUR NET WRL WSR NUT NHL /BA Passe 1 - 20 sees X X X Phase 2 - 10 sees I X I , Phase 3 - 30 sees i I Phase e- 32 sees X I X E Phase 5 - 0 see. Phase 6 - 0 sees Critical MvaK-••I .•.. I•••. .... I.... I •••• Peak 15 Vol -vph 40 129 372 1960 96 20 11 156 ♦N 1452 99 226 Saturation -vph 3500 Shrd 2750 5700 1750 Shrd 3600 Shrd Shrd 5700 1750 Shrd Lost time -sac 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 - - 2.00 2.00 - Relative Nat 'I' 0.19 - O.BS 0.79 0.69 - 0.54 - - 0.66 0.52 - Effeetive Or -sec is - is 30 s - B - - 30 N - Move Time -sae 20 - 20 32 30 - 10 - - 32 30 - Min/Ped Time -sac 10 - 10 30 30 - 30 - - 30 10 - Prog Factor PAT 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 - - 2.00 2.00 - AvDelay/vah -sac 16- 30 15 2S - 26 - - 13 25 - Level of Service C. - D+ C. C- - C- - - a_ C_ _ Av.'Q'/ lane veh 1 - 6 7 2 - 2 - - 6 2 _ Vah Stopping a 79 - 95 87 9e - 95 - - N1 96 - Do Veh Clear 7 YES - YES YES YES - YES - - YEN YEN - Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (see) . 17 Level of Service - C+ Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (sae) . 1N Laval of Service v C+ - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (ICU) v 0.7e Required Cycle Length is 72 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 198S Highway Capacity Manual C A P S E 1 11-1•-91 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY or CAMPBELL EXISTING SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME SASCOM 6 =kMPISSI FLflibaspis P.M Peak flour Scenario f Movement Phase 1 - 20 sees EDT E EEL EBR SST RSL SSR X NOT Wall. NSR I MST HIM fM Phase 2 - 10 secs X Phase 3 - 10 Sees _ : X X Phase • - 32 seem X X Phase s - o s•cf X S _ Phase 6 - 0 sees Critical Mvmt-••I .... I.... I Peak 15 Vol -vpA Saturation -vph •0 3500 229 37• logo 96 28 Sell 1S6 /• 7.I83 •203 236 Lost time -See 2.00 Shrd 17SO 5700 2750 1hrd - 2.00 2.00 3600 Shrd Shrd 5700 1750 Sh" Relative Sat IS, 0.19 2.O0 - - O.B6 O.0.•9 - 2.00 - - O.S/ 2.00 2.00 - t!lsetivs Or -Sze 1• - if 30 • - 0.65 0.57 Nova Time -see 20 - - 20 32 10 - • _ 10 30 a - Min/Pod Tier -see 10 - 30 10 10 - 32 10 Prog Factor PAP 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 _ 30 - 1.00 - 30 30 AvDsl• y /vsA -one 16 - 31 16 25 - - 2 .00 1.00 - Level of Service C+ - D C+ C- 21 - 31 25 Av.'Q'/ Ian* vh 1 - - 6 7 2 C_ - - S- D+ - V•A Stopping % 79 - - 96 as 91 - 2 95 - 6 2 Do V•h Clear 7 YES - YEf YES YES _ - YES - S1 9• - - YES YES - Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (see) . 17 Level of Service . C+ Critical Movements ' - Weighted Av, Delay (sec) . 19 Level of Service . C. - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) . 0.75 Required Cycle Length is 72 seconds (All Minimum times are Satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Msthodology Per 298S Highway Capacity Manual C A P S S I 13-1•-91 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMP•EL, EXISTING SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME WCOM i CAMPISSI PLNWbespla !.M Peak Hour Scenario Mcvs nt Phase I - 20 Mace EST X ESL ESR SST Sal, SSR M•T N1L WWR NET NM p( Phase 2 - 10 sees X X I Phase 3 - 10 Mace X X X _ Phase a - 32 seen X X Phase S - 0 see• ' X ; Phalle 6 - 0 mace ' Critical Mvmt-••I .... I•... I.••• Peak 15 Vol -vph 41 131 382 1913 97 28 11 li• 69 1602 •204 131 Saturation -vph Lost time 3500 Shrd 1750 5700 17SO Shrd 3600 Shrd Shrd 5700 2760 Shr, -Mee Mlative Sat 'X' 2.00 0.20 - 2.00 2.00 2.00 - - O.87 0.82 O.SO 2.00 - - 2.00 2.00 - Effective Gr-set 1S - - is 30 • O.SS - - 0.69 0.53 Move Ties -Mee 20 - - 20 32 10 - • - - 10 - - 30 32 • 10 Min/Pod TLnn-sec 10 - 10 10 10 - 10 - - Frog Factor PAr 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 1.00 - - 10 1.00 10 1.00 AVDelay/veh -sae 16 - 32 16 25 - 26 - - Level of Service C. - D C. C- - C_ - 16 25 - Av.'Q'/ lane vah 1 - 6 S 2 - - •- M Veh Stopping s 79 - 96 SS 96 - 2 95 - DO VMh Clear 7 YES - YES YES YES - - YES - 82 YES 95 YES whole Intersection - Weighted AV Delay (Mee) . 17 Level of service . C+ Critical M0v0MMntM - Weighted AV Delay (see) - 19 Level of Service - C+ - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) - 0.76 Required Cycle Length is 72 seconds (All Minimum tiess say satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 21) - Sneed on Delay Methodology Par 198S Highway Capacity Manual C A P S S 1 11-1i-9• COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL EXISTING SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME FLNtprullbam BASCOM S PRUNEYARD P.M Peak Hour Scenario 1 Movement EST tBL EBR SST fBL iBR MST MBL NOR NBT NIP MBL . Phase 1- 10 sees X X X X Phase 2 - 30 *sea X X Phase 3 - 24 sees X - , Phase • - 0 see. , Phase S - 0 sees . Phase 6- O Goes I I I Critical Mvmt-•• ••'• ••• 266 71 1f92 1630 106 Peak 15 Vol -vph 259 1750 17SO 5700 fhrd 5700 17SO Saturation -vph 2.00 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 Lost tine -sec Relative Sat 'X' 0.61 0.22 0.76 - 0.36 34 0.33 • Effective Gr-see a 9 22 - 32 10 Move Time -Dec 10 10 24 - 20 0 10 Min/Pod Tine-eec 10 10 20 - 1.0 1. Prop Factor PAY 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 2 12 AvDolay/veh -sec 23 12 i - A 2- Level of Ssrvics C- f- B+ - 2 2 AV.'Q'/ lane vah 3 1 1 - 36 87 Vah Stopping a 96 SS i0 - YES YES Do Veh Clear 7 YES YES I YES whole Intersection - Meiphted Av Delay (see)- 7 Love' of Service v B+ Critical Movements - Moighted Av Delay (see) - 9 Level of Nrvice - B+ •• •• - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (ICU) 0.68 Required Cycle Length is 66 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) Delay Methodology Par 1945 Highway Capacity Manual • CAPP.SI (Release 11) - Based on C A P 6 6 1 11-1H-91 COMPRSHENSIVZ ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBEL E + APPROVED SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME rLMtprunEal HASCOM 6 PRUNkYARD P.M Peak Hour Scenario : Movement EST EEL ESA HET SOL HER MST NHL NHR NHT HHL am Phase 1 - 11 sees I E Phase 2 - 10 see/ I I , Phase 3 - 27 sees I Z E . Phase 6 - 0 Sees Phase 5 - 0 sees Phase 6 - 0 see/ Critical Mvsit-•• •••• •••• .••• Peak 15 Vol -vph 259 71 1905 264 1639 106 Saturation -vph 17SO 1750 5700 Shrd 5700 1750 Lost ties -see 2.00 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 Relative Set 'Z• 0.79 0.22 0.73 - 0.35 0.36 Effective Or -see 9 9 25 - 35 H Move Ties -ass 11 11 27 - 37 10 Min/Pod TLse-see 30 10 20 - 20 10 Frog Factor PAY 1.00 1.00 1.00 - 2.00 1.00 AvDelay/vah -see 22 13 7 - 2 16 Level of Service C- a- a+ - A a- Av.'Q'/ lane vsh 3 1 5 - 2 1 Veh Stopping 6 95 SS 77 - 36 H9 Do Veh Clear 7 YES YES YES - YES YES Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (see) - 7 Level of Service - E+ Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (see) . 9 Laval of Service . S+ " - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (ICU) • 0.67 Required Cycle Length is 68 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Mooed on Delay Methodology Per 2955 Highway Capacity Manual C A P S S I 11-19-94 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM POA A SINGLE SIONALIfLD IN'YERBECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL I ♦A♦PR=CT SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME PLmsprunha 'kSCON 6 PAUNETARD P.M Peak Hour Scenario Movement EST ESL ESR BHT SHL SSR MST NHL WWSR NUT SOL HH Phase I - 12 mew I E Phase 2 - 10 Nee E I Phase 3 - 27 sacs I I E Phase 4 - 0 secs Phase S - 0 sees Phase 6 - 0 sees Critical Mvmt-^• •••• •••• •••• Peak 15 Vol -vph 296 75 1905 275 1439 106 saturation -vph 1750 2750 5700 Shrd 5700 2750 Lost time -see 2.00 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 Relative Sat 'E' O.83 0.21 0.75 - 0.35 0.37 Effective Or -see 10 30 2S - 35 U Have Time -see 12 12 27 - 37 10 Min/Pod Tine -see 10 30 20 - 20 30 Prop Pastor PAP 1.00 2.00 1.00 - 2.00 1.00 AvDelay/vah -see 21 12 a - 2 14 Level of service C- a- S. - A - S- Av.'Q'/ lane veh 3 1 S - 2 1 Veh stopping a 96 83 79 - 2S 09 Do Vah Clear ? 1 YES YES YES - 1 1 YES ENS Whole Intersection - Weighted AV Delay (see) - 7 Level of Service - H♦ Critical Movawants - Weighted AV Delay (see) - 10 Level of Service a H- - Intersection Capacity Utiliaotion (ICU) - 0.70 Reguirad Cycle Length is 69 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 21) - Sawed on Delay Methodnlogy Per 198S Highway Capacity Manual C A P S S I 11-18-9� COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL I • A - P + FUTURE GROWTH SOLUTION USING RSQUIRSD CYCLE TIME FLNgprunbas BABOON 6 PRUNEYARD P.M Peak Hour Scenario 6 Movement EST ZBL SON SOT SOL SOR WNT VOL MBR NOT ROL SIR Phase 1 - 13 sacs I x Phase 2 - 10 sees x x Phase 3 - 29 eses x I x Phase a - 0 sec. Phase 5 - 0 see. Phase 6 - 0 sees Critical Mvmt-•• •••• •••• .... Peak 1S vol -vph 299 76 1928 278 1656 107 saturation -vph 1750 1750 5700 Shrd 5700 1750 Lost time -See 2.00 2.00 2.00 - 2.00 2.00 Relative sat 'x• 0.81 0.21 0.75 - 0.36 0.60 Effective Or -see 11 11 27 - 37 a Move Time -see 13 13 29 - 39 1c Min/Ped Time -see 10 10 20 - 20 10 Prog Factor PAT 1.00 1.00 2.00 - 1.00 1.00 AvDelay/veh -see 23 13 B - 2 16 Level of Service C- B- SN - A O: Av.'Q'/ lane veh 3 1 S - 2 1 Vsh Stopping 6 9S 82 78 - 39 90 Do Veh Clear 7 YES YES YES - YOB YES Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay ,see) - 7 Level of Ssrvies . a. Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (see) - 30 Level of Service • s- - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (ICU) - 0.70 Required Cycle Length is 52 seconds (All Minimum ties@ are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Aeleaee 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Par 19S5 Highway Capacity Manual C A P i t I COMP XM1tNSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM 11-1s-91 FOR A SINGLT SIGMALIZZD IMTZRSZCTION CITY or CRNpwmL ZZISTING SOLUTION USING RSQUIRZD CYCLE TIN[ BASCOM 6 CAMPBELL PLNtbasCY P.M Peak Hour Scenario I MOve"nt Thaw 1 - 1s saca ZBT ZZL SON SBT SOL SU Z Z WIBT NBL NON on ROL RON Phase 2 - 20 secs E E Phase 3 - 18 wee Z Z _ ' Phase 6- 0 sacs Z Z Z Phase S - 0 sacs Phase 6 - 0 Sees • Critical Mvmt-••I .... I.... I I Peak IS Vol -vph Saturation -vpn 629 $22 2553 129 697 6s 3S 02S 3soo uo 29 Lost tise -sec 1750 5700 17so 1750 17s0 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 3s00 S- Relative Sat •Z' Effective Gr-sae 2.00 2.00 O.51 0.86 0.78 0.42 0•S0 0.07 0.2.06 0.03 0.07 0.06 0.63 2.00 - 0.s1 Nove Ties -sae 16 16 16 s 26 16 16 16 18 is IS - • Min/Pod Time -see 10 28 19 Is is 10 20 10 10 10 - Frog Factor PAP AvOelay/veh -sac 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 10 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 10 - 1.00 - Le.el of Service 19 12 13 S B. C. B_ s s 9 16 - Av.'Q'/ lane vah B- 3 A B+ S, B+ 6 B- - Veh Stopping 64 1 3 0 0 2 93 90 se 61 2 - Do Vah Clear T 67 67 77 YES YZS YZS YES YZS YZS 91 YZs ris Us Whole Intersection Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sec) . 11 Level of service . Critical Movements - Weightsd B- Av Delay (sec) . 13 Level of Service . - Intersection capacity B- Utilisation (ICU) . 0.76 Required Cycle Length is 66 seconds (All Minimum times ara Satisfied) CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology per 198S Highway Capacity Manual C A P e e 1 Il-le-9s CONPRTHENSIVI ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CRMPSELL I . APPROVED SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME SASCOM 6 CAMPBELL FLNtbascam P.M Peak Hour Scenario Movement Phase 1- 19 sac• SST ESL CDR SST SBL an � MST MaL Wag ' PDT MBL HBI Ph&" 2 - 30 sees Z I I I I I Phase 3- 19 sees I I Y Z Phase 6 - O sees ' Phase S - 0 goes Phase 6 - 0 see• . Critical Mvmt-••I ..•• I.•.• Teak 1S Vol -vph 632 $27 1553 229 510 4S 30 $28 • 322 29 Saturation -vph 3500 17SO S700 ,7SO 17SO 1750 17SO $700 3500 Shre Lost time -sac 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 - Relative Sat 'x• 0.51 O.SS 0.77 0.66 O.S2 0.07 0.06 0.62 O.S3 Effective Or -see 17 17 17 a 27 17 17 17 • Move Ties -see 19 39 19 10 29 19 19 19 10 Min/Ped Time -sec 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Prog Factor PAT 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 AvDelay/veh -sac 30 19 12 14 S a a Level of service a. C. a- B- a. 9 D• h S+ 15 Av.•Q•/ lane veh 3 S ♦ 1 3 S- Vah stopping a 79 92 89 90 62 0 0 2 66 66 76 2 Do Veh Clear 7 YES ITS YES YES YES r1s ras YES 91 YES - Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sac) . 11 Level of Service . S- Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (see) . 24 Level of Service . a- - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (ICU) . 0.76 Required Cycle Length is 66 seconds (All Ninieum bees are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Daley Methodology Per 192E Highway Capacity Manual C A P S S 1 II-1B-9a COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALISED INTERSECTION CITY or CAIDaELL E • A • PROJECT SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIiOL FLNsbaseae P.M Peak Hour Scenario 3 9RECOM 6 CR"SELL Movement EST ESL SSR SET EEL SSR HET WEL WON NS7 NSL NSP Phase 1 - 19 wee >T E E , Phase 2 - 10 we• E E I _ Phase 3 - 19 woes E E . Phase a - 0 secs Phase 5 - O woe• Phase 6- 0 seesl I I I Critical Mvmt-•• •••• 632 S27 1570 312 SID �f 3S S2E ••.• 312 :9 Peak 15 Vol -vph 3500 17SO 5700 1750 1750 17SO 27SO $700 3500 SWN Saturation -vph 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Lost time -see Relative Sat 'E' O.fl O.ES 0.7E 0.69 O.S2 0.7 0.17 O.17 O.f6 - Effective or -sac 17 17 17 S 27 10 29 17 17 1 19 19 17 19 _ 10 move Time _sac 19 19 19 10 10 10 SO 10 10 10 10 = Min/Ped Time -see 10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.O0 2.00 1.O0 1.00 Frog Factor PAT 10 19 12 1S _ Is AvDalay/vah -see S. C. S 9 : E• 96 S9 I- - Level of Service S 2 3 0 Av.•Q'/ lane veh 3 S s9 91 62 66 66 76 91 - Vah stopping 6 79 92 YES YES YES YES YES YES YIE YES TIE Do Vah Clear 7 I I I Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (see) ' 11 Level of Service . 9- Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (see) ' 14 Level of Service - 9- •• •• - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (ICU) - 0.76 Required Cycl• Length is 69 second@ (All Minimus times are satisfied) Delay methodology Per 1995 Highway Capacity Manual • CAPSSI (Release 11) - 9asad on C A P S S I 11-14-96 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBE.LL E . A • P ♦ FUTURE GROWTH SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME BASCOM a CAMPBELL FLNibasc: P,M Peak Hour Scenario Movement Phase 1- 19 EST EBL MDR SBT SBL SUR I WBT WBL MR ( MST M M MBI &sea Phase 2 - 10 sacs Z I I I , Phase 3 - 19 sees I Z I ?Mse a - 0 sees Z I E Phase S - 0 sec• Phase 6 - 0 saes Critical Mvmt-•• .... .. Peak 1S Vol -vph 639 533 2569 144 526 46 39 •316 Saturation -vph Lost time -sec 3500 17SO 5700 17SO :750 17SO 938 1750 5700 3500 SI thrc Relative Sat •X' 2.00 0.52 2.00 0.86 2.00 2.0r! 2.00 2.U0 2.00 2.00 2.00 Ef !active Gr-see 17 17 0.79 0.69 0.52 0.07 0.06 0.63 0.5I Nova Tine -sec 19 19 17 9 19 10 27 29 17 17 17 B Min/Ped Tine -sac 10 10 10 10 10 19 19 19 10 Prog Factor PAP 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 2.00 10 10 1.00 1.00 10 AvDelsy/vsh -sac 10 19 12 35 5 1.00 Level of service a. C. _ B5 B2 a a 9 1S - Av.'Q'/ lane veh 3 5 B' B. B- - Veh Stopping3 79 93 90 91 62 0 0 2 2 - Do Veh Clear 7 YES YES YES YES YES 66 YES 66 76 92 _1 I I YES YES 1 YES - Whole intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sac) . 11 41 of Service . S- Cri�ical Movements - Weighted Av, Delay (sec) . 16 Level of Service . S- - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) . 0.77 Required Cycle Length is 68 seconds (All Minimum tiles are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway Capacity Manual C A P 6 6 1 11-18-91 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPSELL EXISTING SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME "Icamuni CAMPBELL 6 UNION P.M Peak Hour Scenario Movement CRT EEL ESR SET SE:• s6R WBT NBL NOR MDT NOL W Phase 1 - 10 sacs I I Phase 2 - 20 sacs I I I Phase 3 - 12 sacs I I I Phase a - 0 same Phase S - 0 sacs Phase 6 - 0 sacs Critical Mvmt-•• '••• "" '••• Peak 15 Vol -vph 2128 92B 773 261 117 li Saturation -vph 3600 1750 3800 2750 3500 Stir Lost time -sac 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 - Relative sat •I' 0.69 0.74 0.31 0.78 0.40 - Effective Or -sac is 30 28 8 10 - Hove Tice -sac 20 32 30 10 12 - Min/Ped Time -sec 20 20 20 30 10 - Prog Faccor PAY 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - AvDelay/vsh -sac 8 6 2 20 1s - Level of service a+ A A C- C. - Av.•Q•/ lane vah 6 3 2 3 _ 3 - Vah Stopping % 81 61 62 95 96 - Do Veh Clear 7 YES YES YES YES YEs - Whole Intersection - Vaighted Av Delay (sae) v 6 Level of Service - B+ Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (sac) - 11 Level Of Service - 8- •• •' - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (ICU) - 0.78 Required cycle Length is 62 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1905 Mighvay Capacity Manual C A P S S 1 11-1e-9� COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL E ♦ APPROVED SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME C1610pat L a UNION P.M Peak Hour FLWieameni scenario Movement EST E5L ESR SBT S5L SSR NET WWSL NSR MY WRL N5 Phase I - 10 sees E E Phase 2 - 20 soce E E I Phase 3 - 12 *sea E E E Phase a - 0 seem , Phase 5 - 0 sees Phase 6 - 0 seem Critical Mvmt-••I .... I I •... I .... Peak 15 Vol -vph 1151 932 789 261 698 16 Saturation -vph 3800 17SO 3800 1750 3500 Shr Lost time -see 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 - Ralativa sat 'E' 0.71 0.75 0.31 0.75 0.50 - Effective Or-eae is 30 2e a 10 - Move Time -See 20 32 30 10 12 - Min/Pod Time -sec 20 20 20 10 10 - Prog Factor PAP 1.00 1.00 1.0n 1.00 1,00 - AvDelay/veh -see 6 5 2 20 15 - Leval of Service A. A A C- C. - Av.'Q•/ lane veh ♦ 3 2 3 3 - Veh Stopping % 82 61 62 95 f6 - Do Vsh Clear 7 YES YES YES YES YES - Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (see) - B Level of Service a B+ Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (see) - 11 Laval Of Service - 5- - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (ICU) - 0.78 Required Cycle Length is 62 second■ (All Minimum times arm satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Nighvay Capacity Manual C A P S S I 11-1s-9� COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPSELI. 3 ♦ A . PROJECT SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME FIJI j csmuni CAMPSELL S UNION P.M Peak Hour Scenario . Movement EST ESL HER SST EEL SSR WBT WRL WIN NET IM HIS Phase 1 - 10 sacs I I Phase 2 - 20 sees I I I Phase 3 - 12 sece I I I Phase 4 - 0 secs Phase 5 - 0 sees Phase 6 - 0 secs Critical Mvmt-•• •••• "'• "•' Peak 15 Vol -vph 1161 932 SOS 266 s!S 171 Saturation -vph 3800 1750 3500 17SO 3500 Shed Lost ties -sac 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 - Relative sat 'X' 0.71 0.75 0.32 0.79 0.60 - Effective or -sac is 30 28 S 30 - Move Time -sac 20 32 30 10 12 - Min/Pod Time -sec 20 20 20 10 10 - Prog Factor PAT 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 1.00 - AvDelay/veh -sec 9 5 2 21 1S - Level of Service a. A A C- C♦ - Av.'Q'/ lane vah 4 3 2 3 3 - Vsh Stopping 6 82 61 62 95 96 - Do Veh Clear 7 YES YES YES YES YES - Whole Intersection - weighted Av Delay (see) - S Level of Service v S♦ Critical Movements - weighted Av Delay (sac) - .1 Level of Service - S- '• •• - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) - 0.75 Required Cycle Length is 62 seconds (All Minimum timaS are satisfied) • CAPSSI (Release I--) - Eased on Delay Methodology Per 1995 Highway Capacity Manual C A. S S 1 xl-ls-9a COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY or CAMPBELL E + A + P ♦ FUTURE GROWTH SOLUTI0N USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIIQ FLMseemYOi CRMPSELL 6 ONION P.M Peak (lour scenario Movement EDT ESL EBR SCT SSL ssR MST WSL MSR MST an O Phase I - 20 mace x x Phase 2 - 20 Woes x x x Phase 3 - 13 sees x x x Phase a - 0 saes Phase S - 0 sees Phase 6 - 0 sacs Critical Mvmt-••I .... I I ••.• I •••• Peak 15 Vol -vph t17S 943 814 267 504 17 Saturation -vph 3800 27SO 3600 1750 3SOO Shr Lost time -sac 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 - Rslative sat •x' 0.74 0.75 0.33 0.82 0.76 - Effeetive Or-esc is 31 26 s 11 - Move Time -sae 20 33 30 30 13 - Min/Pad Time -sec 20 20 20 30 10 - Prog Factor PAP 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - AvDelay/veh -see 9 5 3 23 la - Level of Service a. A A C_ a- - Av.•Q'/ lane veh a 3 2 3 3 - Veh stopping a 94 61 11 96 92 - Do Veh Clear 7 YES YES YES YES YES - Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (sac) - B Level of Service - B+ Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (sec) - 10 Level of Service - B- - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (ICU) - 0.79 Required Cycle Length is 43 seconds (All Minimum time are Satisfied) • CAPSSI (Aelaase 21) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 198S Mighvay, Capacity Manual C A P S S I ll-IS-94 ;JDMPRENEMSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALISED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPRELL 9 ♦ APPROVED USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME SOLUTION FLNvhwycre P.M Peak Hour Scenario 1 CREEESIDL i ANY 17 NE Movement RUT EEL ERR EST SSL SSM MET WRL MRR MRT NRI. HRR • Phase I - 16 /ec■ E E _ I Phase 2 - 20 sees Phase 2 - 0 Nee , Phase ♦ - 0 "as Phase 5 - 0 secs Phase 6 - 0 sacs I I♦•♦• I Critical MVmt-••I •••• 569 92 D57 ♦9S Peak 15 Vol -vph Saturation -vph 1500 1750 3500 5700 2.00 Lost time -sec 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.17 Relative Sat 'E' 0.42 0.24 0.19 is Effective Or -see 14 16 is 20 Have Time _see 16 16 20 20 Min/Pod Time-eec 20 10 20 1.00 Prog Factor PAY 1.00 2.00 1.00 AvDelay/veh -see 6 S ♦ A Level of Service a♦ S♦ A 1 AV.'Q'/ lane vh 2 1 1 SS Vsh Stopping 9 77 6s SS YES Do Veh Clear 7 I YES YES I YES Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (see) ' S Level of Service - A R♦ Critical Novment• - Weighted Av Delay (see) . S Level of Service - 0.29 .• •• - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) - Required Cycle Length is 36 seconds (A11 Minimum tiers are satisfied) Delay Methodology Per 1955 Highway Capacity Manual • CAFESI (Raises* 11) - Rased on C A P S S I 11-18-96 COMPRIHINSIVI ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZZD INTZRSZCTION ' CITY OF CAMPBELL I + A + PROJZCT SOLUTION USING RZQUIRZD CYCLI TINS: FLN3hvycr• A.M Peak Hour Scenario (91ZZRSIDI i HWY 17 NB Movement EST ZSL ZSR SZT S&L SZR MST WZL HER WNT mm RI Phase 1 - 16 Sacs X X x Phase 2 - 20 Ncs X Phase 3 - 0 sacs Phase s - 0 secs . Phase S - 0 sacs . Phase 6 - 0 sees Critical Mvmt-•'I " " •••• 503 Peak 15 Vol -vph S69 97 361 5700 aaturatiOn -vph 3500 1750 3800 2.00 ;at ties -sec 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.1a Relative sat 'X' 0.42 0.14 0.19 la Zffective Or -sec 14 14 is 20 Have Time -sac 16 16 20 2 0 Min/red Tice-aeC 30 10 20 1.0 Prog Factor PAT 2.00 1.00 1.00 ` AvDelay/veh -sac 6 S 6 A Level of Service a+ a+ A 1 AV.'Q•/ lane veh 2 1 1 SS Vah Stopping • 73 6S 55 Yts Do Veh Clear 7 YIS YZS I YIS Whole Intersection - Weighted Av Delay (eee) - S Level of service ` A Critical Movements - Weighted Av Delay (see) ` S Level of /e Oice ` S+ •• •• - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) ` Required Cycle Length is 36 seconds (All Minimum times are satisfied) Delay Methodology For 198S Highway Capacity Manual • CAPSSI (Release 11) - Xaeed on C A P S S I 11-18-94 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL I + A + PROJECT SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME FLN,hvyere CREEESIDE 6 WHY 17 Na A.M Peak Hour Scenario 3 Movewn[ IEB2 sHu EBR fBT iaL faR wai wBL MaR MIT NaL RaR Phase 1 - 16 Sacs E I I Phase 2 - 20 sacs E Phase 3 - 0 sac/ Phase 6 - 0 secs Phase S - 0 sec/ Phase 6 - 0 Sacs Critical Mvmt-•• "•' •�•• S03 Peak 1S Vol -vph S69 97 361 5700 Saturation -vph 3SOO 1750 3800 2.00 Lost ti" -See 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.12 Relative fat •S' 0.62 0.14 0.19 1s Effective Or -See 16 16 is 20 Move Time -see 16 :6 20 20 Min/red Time -sec 10 30 20 1.00 Frog Factor PAT 1.00 1.00 1.00 AvDalay/veh -Sac 6 5 6 A Level of service a+ a+ A 1 Av.'Q'/ lane veh 2 1 1 SS Veh stopping a 73 6S SS YIt Do Veh Clear 7 YE! YE! YES whole Intersection - weighted AV Delay (sac) S Level of Service - A Critical Movewnte - weighted AV Delay (Sae) S Level of service - a+ •• •• - Intersection Capacity Utilisation (ICU) - 0.29 Required Cycle i.angth is 36 **condo (All Minimum times are Satisfied) • CAPSII (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Par 1985 Highway Capacity Manual C A P S S I 11-1a-96 COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS PROGRAM FOR A SINGLE SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION CITY OF CAMPBELL E a A • PROJECT SOLUTION USING REQUIRED CYCLE TIME FLN:hvycre CREEESIDE 6 HWY 17 Na A.M Peak Hour Scenario 6 Movement ENT EIL EaR MIT SSL SSR UST WIL WBR MST MIL NUR Phase 1 - 16 sacs I E Ph&" 2 - 20 macs E E Phase 3 - 0 secs Phase 6 - 0 secs Thaw S - 0 "on Phase 6 - 0 sees Critical Mvmt-•• •••• •••• Peak IS Vol -vph 576 96 365 509 Saturation -vph 3500 1750 3800 5700 Lost time -Dec 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 Relative Sat •E• 0.62 0.16 0.19 0.18 Effective Gr-sec 14 1/ 19 is _ Move Time -sec 16 16 20 20 ,kin/Ted Time -see 10 10 20 20 Frog Factor PAY 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 AVDe1ay/veh -sac 6 S 4 4 Level of Service a• a. A A Av.•Q'/ lane vsh 2 1 1 1 Veh Stopping 6 73 65 55 SS Do Vsh Clear 7 YES YFS YES YES 1 1 Whole Intersection - Weighted AV Delay (sec) - 5 Level of Service - A Critical Movements - Weighted AV Delay (sac) a S Level of Service - U� •• •• - Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) - 0.29 Required Cycle Length is 36 seconds (All tii..imum times are satisfied) • CATSSI (Release 11) - Based on Delay Methodology Per 1985 Highway Capacity Manuel