The URL can be used to link to this page

S 97-20, UP 97-111999 S. BASCOM AVE. S 97-20/UP 97-11 1 OF 7 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLAN. 08/2000 Please format one line labels on microfiche: CITY OF CAMPBELL City of Campbell Address File No. FILE NO. 7a, 2,,0 / (g4 P 97wp(l E� AML n ` ryxbk:t ... 'fie: frf:d<c.-a►'x..u..--....,dot•"Yil�:-�.��.'•r1Ta,�41A�4.iiiSu; wivon.a� .. •�•..H-a..N�d:.sswo$W:.�oYi�:.�'u�a. .�..�e�. .u.FR;•.++� 'J�.lu, k'.,:...,. w:.1yl+�.a:e,l6e ww`r�ora`a•„ 1999 S. Bascom Ave UP 97-11 The Prune;•ard y'1-zu 0 1 1 .—I o rl N I C• N O� O� a v� a� d M O U a� O d � O a aD rn � i �N 1 A PRUNEYARD PLACE c—p.... C-p� lftwl dlNw WIELIAM WILSON & ASKPCIATIS lif dKIIEN GPM, 01 FICE 011.111DW.- RENDEFIN-S, Au PRUNEYARD PLACE 4�p•.<r< C•.p tgN•<I 0111<•. .rr tr•.1,. 44 WILLIAM WILSON • ASSOCIATIS I� __- �_..7_' _ ' �' .I •I--�-�_i I _ =-- -- — - _ _ __ - �..G.._-._.._.._.._..__�_•._—••_.._.._•._.._ �T_.. ice_ .— — —f— _ — ----- _ • i $ it =f•_ _ _ -- -- I t Vrbcstdl, nc. r —{� m — _ — 3,'we,e, e_� e_e,a• b e ja _ = i _ •— _:I _ 00 17 o ono AD 000 00 oo -0 - [ _ L. 0:) e 0- of OFFICE k GARAGE SITE PLAN Al 02 sitv n,rtitwa��e1 �t0 P-g 3 A ls�chmtnt A PRU N EYA R D PLACE & INN N PROJECT SUMMARY Assessors Parcel Number. 286 _ 04 23 Lot Size: I .9 7 2 . 000 Gross sq. ft. (Pmpaq to camtr line of unn, 1.186.705 Net $1.It. Utilization: Sq. ft. Percent % Building Coverage (include rantile pomcm) 435.533 37 i Landscape Coverage 177300 15 % Paving Coverage 573.971 4817, Floor Area Ratio: Total building sq. h. divided by net lot size 0.63 Adiacent Land Uses SIX zon*ng N-rth RESIDENTIAL R South RETAIL / RES. C-2 East RETAIL C--) West FREEWAY NA Parkin Standard 2.146 Compact NA Handi:.p 40 TOTAL 2.186 Restaurant and Assembly Uses Seating C,_rat 1.910 e,i ential Protects Unit Type A B C Living Area NA Garage Area N.A Total Area N A No of Bedrooms N.A Number of Units NA R-14 1, 13193 PRUNEYARD Q PLACE i tywd wiw. �i WILLIAM WILSON • wssxuns -ROUND F;.GOR pial. W6nld1; lncf ON: - GROUND FLOOR PLAN A2.01 1999 S. BASCOM AVE. S 97-20/UP 97-11 1 OF 9 CLTY OF CA.MPBELL PLAN. _ 121/99 0 Z A LL 04-L6 S ptufuunr,l u4l ;,-Lo d0 ;AV wowt:"V '5 6661 .+ o n o- m c+ a� 0 c s E .o O r, � C L C 7 c f- FRW : [EtPSTEP, SELIGM,14 8 P"tE^i PHONE W. : 4W 3% uOSI Mar. 24 1999 12:39PN PI Dempster Seligmann L��Ralneri Law �—.- w0.m R sclw— - !—PhCfw—. FAX COVER SHEET I1o0"` DeIDpi�'"•° PLEASE DELIVER M,4EDIATELY KneT c a* L"w A.— Tj_ To: Fax Number: Number of Pages to Follow This One: Ir you did not receive all pages, Please contact sender at (403) 356-I950. Date: 2 9 Sender: G'i�Ign Telephone:_,[40R5 356-1915(_ Subject: Ver A<, klt(r.w Comments: NBra(. t%le /'ia�r�vo�� dyr2c�se,T Copy to follow by mail? Yes_____ No— Tuts 6ILCi f.i tC QREt✓,fun nM V ACIORVICwn ANMMAYCQPOA aMATInN TIATIC ^'FGED n Fl FI�..L.ANQ cYRutrr wnu .sr-r rxt ILc 1 NvnFR APM Ir•181 c i ff THE READER 0! THIS A�SSAG! IS NOT INTF]JDPD REN�pI]VT, 00. T3¢ EMPLOYEE OR wGF2 RESPONSIBLE FOR De.1VPJtB+G 1HE MESSAGE TO THB INTENDED RECIPIENT. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION. DISTRIBUTION OR COPY OP THIS COMMUNICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR. PLF-%SE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY TELEPHONE AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE TO US AT THE BELOW ADDRESS v1A THE US. POSTAL SERVICE. THANK YOU. 455 La Gm 8e w—d S.r.a 101 11.a ra CYdae. 950r1 , P, 40p 356 1990 1 Fs 4% 1% 9051 FPOM : DEMPSTER, SELIrkspm & MrW r PHorE Ho. : 408 356 8051 na.. 2.n law 12: 39PM P2 RECORDING REQUESTED BY WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: (SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE) AGREEMENT FOR ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR PRUNEVARD DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, Prtmeyard Associates LLC (hereinafter referred to as "Applicant") tiled application SDP 97-01IS 97-20 with the City of Campbell for a Special Development F'ermit and Site and Architecnrral Approval (hereinafter referred to collectively as "Special Development Pemtit") to construct an office building and parking garage (hereinafter referred to as the "Project") on property commonly known as the "F'mneyard," which is more particularly described in Exhibit A. which is attached hereto and made a part hereof; WHEREAS, on January 20, 1998, the City Council of the City of Campbell adopted Ordinance Number 1955 approving the Spacial Development Permit; WHEREAS, as a condition of the approval of the Special Development Permit, the Applicant was regwted to enter an agreement for traffic improvements (hereinafter referred to as the "Street Improvement Agreement"); WHEREAS, the Campbell City Council gave firm reading to an ordinance to appm ve the Sheet Improvement Agreement on April 7,1998. a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B and made a pan hereof; WHEREAS, the ordinance approving the Street Improvement Agreement is scheduled to be adopted on April 21,1999; WHEREAS, the ordinance approving the Street Improvement Agreement will not become effective until thirty days t30) after it is adopted; and WHEREAS, Applicant desires to proceed with the Project prior to the effective date of the ordinance approving the Street Improvement Agreement; MOH : riE;PSTEP. SEilCitgNJ 8 r—TW-' PHONE NO. : 408 3%710SI Marc 24 1-A9 12:40PM P3 NOW, THEREFORE, inconsideration of the City of Campbell's issuing building permits for the Project, Applicant, on behalf of itself, its heirs, assigns, Ord successors, covenants, stipulates and agrees as follows: I Applicant shall tender to the City the $600,000 deposit identified in section I. 1(d) of the Street Improvement Agreement within sixty (60) days of issuance of building permits for the Project regardless of whether or not the Street Improvement Agreement has been approved; 2. Applicant agrees to comply with all of the terms and conditions of Exhibit B to this Agreement a< if it has been approved and is effective: 3 If and when a Street improvement Agreement is adopted by an ordinance of the Campbell City Council and becomes effective, the adopted Stint Improvement Agreement shall supersede and take precedence over any conflicting terms in this Agreement; 4 If, at anytime, Applicant fails to comply with the terms and cunditions of this Agreement, the City may summarily revoke any and all building permits issLwd for the Project and stop all work on the Project until Applicant complies with such tertas and conditions. The Applicant hereby agrees to obey any and all stop work notices issued by the City in accordance with his Agreement; 5 Neither the grantitig of the building permits for the Project, nor any construction undertaken pasuant to the offmits granted for the Project shall be deemed to be acceptance of the Perfomui;ice of any of the conditions of the Project by the City, or waiver of any of those conditions by the City; and Applicant shall terrain bound to perform all corditionn of the Project, 6. Neither the granturg of the building permits for the Project, nor any construction undertaken pursuant to the grarrting of permits for the Project shall vest any right to proceed with the Project until all of the eOrditrom of the Project have bersi satisfied, ins luding but not limited to, final approval of the Street Improvement Agreement and performance of the terms and condittom contained therein, and substantial construction of the Project has beat undertaken in accordance with all applicable permits, conditions and laws, 7. Appiicant expressly assumes Cl risks associated with proceeding with the Project prior to the effective date of the ordinance approving rho .irrcct Impruvement A4pxemem Applicant expressly waives any rights that Applicant may have against the City, its officers, officials, adorneys, employees and agents to contest or seek compensation for any action taken by the City consistent with this Agreement; FRW : DErPSTEp, S IC,%,N 8 r"iK PHD4E rn. : hoe 3F6 �I nar. 24 199? 12: a1RP.7 8 It s understood and agreed that the early commencement of construction confers a conditions, on the progeny commonly krown as the Pruneyard, and consequently the conditions, covenants, stipulations and agreements set forth in this document shall run with land end be binding upon Applicant's heir, assigns and successors: 9. The signal res on this doetmrent shall be Warized, and thus document shall be recorded in the Office of the Tanta Clara County Recorder; 10. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California; 11. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of the parties hereto, and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements between them concerning the subject ratter contained herein. There arc no representations, agreements, arrangements, or understandings. oral or written, between and among the parties hereto, relating to the subject matter wntairied in this :geement, which are not fully ecpressed herein; 12. The uadersignod party has been mireseatcd by an attorney of its choosing, and represents that it has read and fully uu„fersta nds the terms, conditions end covenants contained hrrrein, mid that its zmt rncv has rzW ano form and content; psil0, 'd this agreement as to 13, This Agreement may be amcrrl.d oals by mcmis of writing signed by both the City of Campbell and Appkant; 14. The Applicant shall indemnify, defend (with counsel reasonably chosen by the City of Campbell, atthe City's option), and hold the City and its employees, officers, and agents "armless against all claims and cost (including reasorable attorney's hjes) which arise out of, or in connection with any activity in tperforming any acts under his Agreement. This indemnity shall not extend to any claims arising wlely from the Ic"misole negligence or willful misconduct This sxtiou 14 shall survive the ermination of this agreement; 15. zfany term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement is held by a court of compatentjurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall continue in full force and effect unless the rights and obligations of the psmes have been materially altered or abridged by such invalidation, voiding or u neaforceability 16. If any patty commertces an action or brings any proceedings against a pto this agreement arising Out Of the terms of this agreement, the arty Prevailing party. shall be entitled to mover its reasonable sttoraey's fe!s and court costs. FROM : DEWSTEF, SELIGPWM 8 -I F— PLO E NO. : 408 3% 8951 Ma, 24 1999 12:41PM P5 PRUNEYARD ASSOUATES LLC Dated: By facsimile TRANSMITTAL. To: Kheay Loke. Vice President Of: Wilson-Comerstone (Pmneyard) cc: Gloria Sciara Fax: 408-371-3831 Pages: 4, includit._ this cover sheet. Date. March 16. 1999 Per our conversation yesterday. I am sending along specs for speed humps and striping aet:.il. Also, note that southern speed hump should be moved to north so that traffic is travelling straight when crossing it. Not a good idea to have cars turning when crossing a speed hump. Too easy for car to get out of control. Let me know if you have further questions. Thanks for your co-operation. From the desk of. Peter Esklaod, Traffic Ecgirteer C9y of Campbell 70 North Fi Street Campbell, CA 9500E V 406416C 2154 Fax 404J76-0958 Traffic Manual (MARKINGS 6-15 Figure 6-1 CFNT� _ DETAIL 1 POLICY \ ~ r ! +r r ,r � Centenine pattern for care On two-lane streets and highways (normally .,sxr, on local street. y and highways). IL 2 / w• r ❑ (� ,r r / y I 0 ❑ Ciinl.dmis wnam wlth pavement markers re for use on two-lane stets and highways. DETAIL 3 4' Alternateto Detail 2. For use when there is �. limited honxontal or vertical sight distance ❑ y ❑ O Cl passing is not restricted by no -passing zones. Zones. DETAIL I 411- r r /�• Alternate to Detail 2. For use at problem ❑ 000 O 0 O ❑ locations where it Is difficult to place and y I r I maintain c•nterilne because of moisture, 1' 1 1 sand, etc. DETAIL 5 1' 1' or Centerline pattern for use on two, -lane streets 4- +r I : ,t• and highways (normally used on local streets and highways(. DETAIL 6 r +r I ,r I o• ❑ 0 ❑ e� DETAIL 12• sr I +r^^ ❑ C O (D O ❑ LEGEND 1 I 4" Yellow ~ Directions of Travel [] Two -Way Yellow Reflective Marker 0 Non -Reflective Yellow Marker Centenine pattern with pavement markers for use on two-lane streets and highways. Alternate to Detail 6. For use at problem locations whore it is difficult to place and maintain contorlin , because of moisture, send, etc. 05; 07 9T 05 41 Q7057773333 CITI CCPERTI?O ®005/007 C: NTERLM STR:FE• T N1 8� �31 PLAN VIEW W 37--.� REFLECTIVE WHITZ PAVE.NENT :FGENO �J [I�L I EC7.'VE WHITE S7R1FE3 -EET SPACING 4 TAPER I SECTION A -A 3.25° 3.04'� 2.43 " 1.42 " C.0" i I IQ' & 6' 0" TYP 12'-0 SECTION ROAD,BUMP -PAOVC7 .-17GTY OF CUP�'N� • It STANDARD EXHIBIT A L MIT i� ID -ej r t -7.) -1 ti r Key: Painted Directional Arrow Dashed Yellow Line N111 Speed Bump -* Sign to Pruncy2rd Garage N R C O R N I R t. T o N F March I <. 1994 Mr Pro" I,kl.ml Depa""ne" Jfliihh, W.,< C,ly of C'amphell 70 North 1 ,,.t YI,ht Camphel i, C A 9500fi.1 a 21 RP llnnevard I.,.,plea (b utto, .,III-% rsra, Mr I'cklurh Ihalk yw fin Imeuog wok tie inn Mutt 12. Pr"I Aa wggestcd 1 nu wnnng to wumunar the netro we d,so,ow 4 1 w.11 heRuI wnh the :xnosenl .,ions a< hoee m Ms. (Henn ti urYx Ictlrr of )an—y 24 IttW) fnllnwc;l by other ,awn yin, had nosed • Cbmeroon nl nnr-wav dnvewav on the ea<t ode.10 huhick WAN—t a two, w.,v dnvcw•y llua 1h,1u d he rllccwatcd 1) p•unmg douhk vcll„w hoes hctwccn list u,kwalk sin I impVrll and the Are+ a din eway, a dRlanu' of uppw,nuarrly o ion Iwo h-ct • Tu, . dt ll, e,Ira hclmvl faulhack Ctcakhnlite +1'ry,n I,V,ew W till• I, ••n cdv wgge<IrJ n, the 11. 14VV Ir,I,r 1,— 1), �d Wott1 I,, W' S � I, .gpo,,!cd that Ili; nth fiu the pmpnscd Milk pa,kmg he nu, ked yellow wnh the appmpnx, vgnagc mdn atmg the a•.Inv0.•J III— ..I the ad ,i.,. M a sign behind 11nhuM eanny 'All dcl,ve,-moo six loading spaces to tie side Jul' . • Dloe ' 4 p.ng m the _29c Yeu ,uegencd amt a glc da<hed ve In* I ne ale 161 d+re,ul a....,paunrd m he pa,rnw.,t, Iwo .peed hu,np, and a .Igo mlivating Ill, doecann In he garage. all % slaw" nI the au.:. hell A • Rcmn,il .If sight parking apace% "on arc At rise opn,an that the paAulg ,",cs are nor posing a s,gmG,.In na Pic Invmo ad d would nu,tn ...... —lend gthen, • 1 an % are �<4nd<,n the Ila,king kit to ".,1of Unit— •m1 \d,lc Vo.t wggMtd that we "..donate wnh Nader Inc i .. hrxe do, oy y Imo 1, lime been duubk parking inthe urn, whne we rmcM :n :.,tall lanthcapc W.ontle 11a wc,c rn,wancd our rise nrw nlan,k wdl :.na u.: ImAk to park lunhe, ow m , the J,,, Luc. • Ze, ilk eff Campbell h'Ju torpresud.Juc<u1 Iha( lie ca.1 .I 1-111 Doming olr (amphcli Avenue '.in the Ihm,tya,d ter.,mares inan inippr pualt• auglc whith. h,gctha with the lack nta corh sin. makc', tlm connection In the peclesuian c— wilk awkward )'uu < VVg cd cv,cndnv; the odawalk. L pre ak . properly Itwate,l arch cm, and rek,eale the crosswalk if nece—ty I agn•rd Io mva urmc —1 nrnuute:Ix �emw, 1, ail yn • Wyk of A—,,' oll.—fl ough to mdu to aunut eonAlona fix oars u„ ��it the pa,kmg area wh,ch a,, rim planning a gin r Ile dr— fit gl,. you v.,Wgcxlctl painting a single while line on file 1 .uk nl the drrvc through and Iwo Aotcnonal irruw. III the p..cn—I I •creed hn uwrtngate the uruanun • 1 clo.,ng yea ,ndwal,d lh,, vn n rmomnendanona would I,ecd ro K dn,u<.cd wnh the III an,+ma f1q+m ln,.•nr for thin final appnrval 2J20 C.,l •1„ first,111, I1.... 5.n, Mntrn,CA9440 ",.Wo lelryl.one frri01141 51th1 let.rock ttl.il11 W, 704 hm..e runn,pr sip rnrn ►IL a6ad!Z%6I_'MM•NdVC:S 66ISIMO -CORNERSTONE •R606 etc Ogg 3NOISH314003 N0SIIM :AQ lap I ,.,k Iorw.v.l x. Ihl .Inn,—'Wal.o I .—C, —h you —1 Iha' 1'1Jm mf IM'—, 1,na:r�l. \'Iu• Mnmdarol Nr. �pvr hacnkl N� t:kxra iarua IA, 11-1 Wrx,l N Vnplma I'nntlr We 069d•Z%R—zw! IdSi:S 66/SUCO :E606 Z[E OS9 3NO1693Nl109 NOBJIM :A0 3u*j a a Key: y Painted Directional Arrow --- Dashed Ye!low Line -tilt Speed Bump * Sign to Prdnevard Garage ►/► s6rd1ZS6NiAt'NdSC:S 66/11/CO 106O6 ZLC 019 3NO1SONWOO NOSIIM :AQ )usS PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES, L L C March 15, 1999 ^n �� Mr. Bill Helms Public Works Department �..: y V City of Campbell • •• p 70 North First Street an, ry� Campbell, CA 95008-1423 sae., FL,, • 'FCC Re: Campisi Way Extension Street Improvement Agreement Dear Bill: In accordance with the provisions of the Street Improvement Agreement between the City of Campbell and PruneYard Associates, LLC dated as of August 18, 1998, I, on behalf of PruneYard Associates ("Developer'), have met with or had phone conversations with Mr. Frank Kucich on multiple occasions (in August, October'98, January, and March'99) regarding acquiring the "Acquisition Interest" to that portion of the Aloha Apartments property which would allow the extension of Campisi Way thru that property to The PruneYard. Mr. Kucich is one member of the family entity that owns the Aloha Apartments property. Mr. Kucich discussed our interest in acquiring the property with his fellow family member owners and replied to me in early October that the famil•; owners believed that it was in their (rest interests if their property was acquired for the extension of Campisi Way that it )e done thru City initiated condemnation proceedings. Mr. Kucich indicated that these desires were, at least partially, motivated by their understanding that that process provided some lax advantages. During a late January 1999 conversatiun Mr. Kucich indicated that the owners had discussed a sale of the entire apartment complex (106 total units) to a prospective buyer. I discussed the status of thex discussions with you, Steve, and Gloria at City Hall on January 28," and understood that you were going to contact Mr. Kucich directly. Subsequently I have talked to him on several additional occasions, most recently today. The current status is that some but not all family owners have indicated a willingness to sell and Mr. Kucich has spoken to the group interested in acquiring the entire project as recently as March 111b, but those discussions do not appear to have momentum at this time, according to Mr. Kucich. In accordance with provisions of Article 3 of the Street Improvement Agreement this letter serves to notice the City of Campbell that Developer has not succeeded in entering into an agreement to acquire the Acqu ,ition Interest. In accordance with provisions of the Street Improvement Agreement Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 941345 in the amount of $600,000 has been issued to the City of Campbell (copy attached). Si a ly, David R. Word cc: Mr. Steve Piasecki, Director of Planning Ms. Gloria Sciara, Planner II do David Word Mr. Kheay Loke, V.P., Wilson Cornerstone 1999S. Barcom AwnaeMr. Stephen Pilch, SVP, Wilson Cornerstone Suite 200 Campbell, CA 95008 Telephiu r (408) 371-4700 F—imile (408) 371-3831 kAMOUSBank RECEIVED ISSUED BY: MAR i 5 1999 NATiONSSANK, N.A. 'I'O. CITY OF CAMPI1F.[.I, RE: 1RRFV:.)CAHI L•: i.X;'THH OF GREDIT NO. 94134!, GENTLEMEN: AT THE REGUEOT AND FOR T111% ACCOUNT OF PAUNLYARI) L.L.C., 1999 SOUT11 BASCOM AVENUE, 0200, CAMPBELL. CA Jb008 WE' HEIEBY ESTABL1�I11 0(11( IR)tEVOCABLE 6EXI'Fli OF CREDIT NO. 94134D IN ':OUR FAVOR FOR AN AMOUNT N(YP ItX,11•:F:DING US:hG(a .000.rn) FXPiRIN�; A'. THE COUNTERS OF NATIONSBANK, N.A., I401 MAIN STREET, !)';';I FL., DALIAS, TEXAS 757.0:-. ATTN Ll:"1"Hilt u10 CREDIT DEM'. , AT T,!X CI O.,X OI- BUSINESS ON JULY ZG, 2000. FUNDS UNDER THIS CREDIT ARF AVAILABLE TO YOU BY YOUR olwfi' DRAFT(S) DRAWN ON LIS, HF.AIt1NG 'I';I1t CLAUSE "DRAWN UNDER NATIONt:likIK, N.A. LETTER OF CREDIT NO. 94194b" ACC'OMPANIIJ, BY YOUR STATEMENT, DATED AND PURPORTEDLY SIGNE.1) 13Y A Rlil'HE:;EN'I'n'1' I VT OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL READING A: FUI,L)WS "RE: STRRI•"f IMPROVIiMENT AGREEMENT UA':ED AI1GU:;T 18, 1,996 lt;7WI?1:N PRUNHYARD A::;OCTATFO AND 'Pint CITY OF CAMPBELL. WE, THE CITY OF CAMPBELL, CEICI'11.7 THAT THE AMOUNT DRAWN IINUI;k NATIONSBAIIK, N.A. LF'NER 09 CItFD77 J4134b IS DUE (1; lbxAUSF.: 'I'll;•. CITY HAS INCURI(ED RliIMBURSAliLE EXPENSES FOR '1'HL' EXTENSION ov CAMPISI WAY OR PUHI.IC TRANGPURTATION IMPROVEF:ENTS IN THE USNERAI, VICINITY OF THE PRUNL'YARD PROPERTY. PRUNEVARD ASSOCiATF: PAS BE. -:I, PRESENTED WITH A WRITTEN STATEMENT AND INVO[C:F IN ACCOHDANCR WITH PARAGRAPH b.:1(A) OT T11F. Itl^ i•:1t1tiM(:ISD '.7110-3:71' IMPROVF.M;iNT P.GitRF:MENi' WE HE.RFL'Y A,,nl•: WI Yu(1 ;A', DUiI Ir:AWN 1INI)Xit A: P ?'('. WITH THE TERMS OF 'III[:: WILL ;(it DUI:( IP!Ntdt F:1: O.I(C PRESENTATION TO U:;. 'N,GW,1IKit WITH 'rlt; 011?J;:NAI 01- 11!' ; CREDIT. IiUE:JECf TO THE UCl1b00 1 U,IO ItltVI GI U11 . NATIONSBANK, N.A. 901 MA'.N ST. , DTH FI. DAL.LAS, TEXAS 7b202 MiRELIr, COI.hMAN VICE PRESIDENT r r r• r r, .I, (• COPY - NOT NFrr')TIARI c W I L S O N F C O R N E I: S T O N E Much 12, 1999 Mr. Bill Helms RF�F City of Campbell 70 N. First Strec. HQA F Campbell, CA 95C08-1423 p�� pF 1999 Re: Pruncyard Placc/Campisi Way �ry�/hG �p%44 Street Improvement Agreement Dear Bill: In accordance with Section 2.1(a) of the Street Improvement Agreement between the City of Campbell and Pruneyard Associates, LLC, enclosed herewith is the required &posit in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit in the amount of $600,000.00 in favor of the City of Campbell. Sincerely, Kheay Loke Vice President, Development KL/dl Cc: Gloria Sciara, City of Campbell David Word, Pruneyard Associates 2929 Compas Drive, Ph Fhmr San Mateo. CA 94403-'590 Telephone 1630) 341-5300 Facsimile (650) 345-7619 toano.cstoneprop-on, —..,,CORNERSTONE A PROPERTIES Memos sBank ISSUED PY: NATIONSBANK, N.A. TO: CITY OF CAMPBELL RE: IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT NO. 941345 GENT LEMEN : AT THE REQUEST AND FOR THE ACCOUN'. )F PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., 1999 SOUTH BASCOM AVENUE, :00, CAMPBELL, CA 95008 WE HEREBY ESTABLISH OUR IRREVOCABLE i.r:TTER OF CREDIT NO. 941345 IN YOUR FAVOR FOR AN AMOUNT NOT EXCEEDING US$600,000.00 EXPIRING AT THE COUNTERS OF NATIONSBANK, N.A., 901 MAIN STREET, 9TH FL., DALLAS, TEXAS 75202 ATTN LETTER OF CREDIT DEPT., AT THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON JULY 26, 2000. FUNDS UNDER THIS CREDIT ARE AVAILABLE TO YOU BY YOUR SIGHT DRAFT(S) DRAWN ON US, BEARING THE CLAUSE "DRAWN UNDER NATIONSBANK, N.A. LETTER OF CREDIT NO. 941345" ACCOMPANIED BY YOUR STATEMENT, DATED AND PURPORTEDLY SIGNED BY A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL READING AS FOLLOWS: "RE: STREET IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT DATED AUGUST 16, 1998 BETWEEN PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES AND THE CITY OF CAMPBELL. WE, THE CITY OF CAMPBELL, CERTIFY THAT THE AMOUNT DRAWN UNDER NATIONSBANK, N.A. LETTER OF CREDIT 941345 IS DUE US BECAUSE THE CITY HAS INCURRED REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES FOR THE. EXTENSION OF CAMPISI WAY OR PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS IN THE GENERAL VICINITY OF THE PRJNEYARD PROPERTY. PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES HAS BEEN PRESENTL•D WITH A WRITTEN STATEMENT AND INVOICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 5.2(A) OF THE REFERENCED STREET IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT." WE HEREBY AGREE WITH YOU THAT DRAFTS DRAWN UNDER AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS CREDIT WILL BE DULY HONORED UPON PRESENTATION TO US, TOGETHER WITH THE ORIGINAL OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT. SUBJECT TO THE UCP500 1993 REVISION. NATIONSPANK, N.A. 901 MAIN ST., 9TH FL DALLAS, TEXAS 75202 &L*ELLALEMAN VICE PRESIDENT ORIGINAL y PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES, LLC March 11, 1999 Ms. Gloria Sciara ��/JI�S�t Planner 11 / Project Manager C u JZ City of Campbell 70 North First Street MAR 12 1999 Campbell, CA 95008 CITY OF CAMPBELL Re: Site Issues Regarding PLANNING DEPT. Certificiate of Occupancy of Office Development (SDP-9"1 ) Dear Gloria: This letter is a follow-up to your letter of January 29, 1999, addressed to me and to Kheay Loke regarding the site issues to be completed at The PruneYard in conjunction with the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the PruneYard Place office building. It is the expectation and plan of PruneYard Associates, LLC, Compuware Corporation, N'ebcor guilders, and Commercial Interior Contractors to obtain the Certificate of Occupancy for the office building on Friday, March 26 "' so that Compuware may commence relocation of a portion of its staff over that weekend and commence conducting business in the new building not later than April 1, 1999. Al; of the site issues summarized in your January 291" letter will be either completed by March 261", or a bond in the amount of the cost of the incomplete work will be posted with the City of Campbell by that date; with the exceptions discussed in this letter. The following comments correspond to the headings in your letter: .jJimpisi Wav Extension: Agreed. • The Letter of Credit in the amount of $600,000 is currently being Issued in accordance with the terms of the Street Improvement Agreement and will be provided to the City of Campbell this week. Creak Trail Access Agreed. On -Site Circulation Imorovements/ Pavrmpnt Reconstruction: • 'Conversion of the one-way driveway...' Agreed. • 'Removal of the last two parking spaces...' We propose a different solution to this Outback Steakhouse truck delivery issue for the following reasons: 4The permanent loss of B parking spaces in close proximity to Outback Steakhouse, Campbell Coffee, and other retailers in this area is critical. 4There are three mature trees in the islands now that would be lost and. possibly, 2 additional mature Olives. -Currently there are 2 fire hydrants, 3 light poles, and an underground sigh voltage vault, all in the path of the proposed new lane. 4If that section of the street is widened to provide truck parking adjacent to Outback Steakhouse then the lanes behind Outback Steakhouse will not hoe up with the traffic lanes continuing on the south sides of the retail area and Office Tower It. 4Discussions with Outback's management have determined that truck deliveries occur as follows: cio Ourid Wood Day of the w,Yek: Mon Tues wed Thurs Fri 19995. Baacom Avenxr No. of Deliveries: 7-8 5-6 5'6 7-8 1 SWm 200 Campbell, CA 95" Telephoee ('08) 371-I'00 Fxrimile fr08/ 3"1-3831 One delivery r.. Mondays and one on Thursdays takes approximately 30 minutes; all other deliveries ,. • ie,: than 10 minutes and all are scheduled to oct or before noon. Giving consideration -, the above facts we propose converting the 4 spaces marked in red on the enclosed plan to •: uck delivery parking only from 8AM to Noon. Monday thru Friday. this will require eliminating a portion of the raised ci rb in that area along the parking spaces towards Outback, painting the asphalt, and signage.he curbs adjacent to Outback are painted red and marked as fire lanes, management of Outback will work with their vendors to require them to shift their tru.k deliveries from the rear of the restaurant to this new area. This proposed alternate plan addresses the issues and saves desired parking in this area. We request that this alternative be approved. • -Directional striping...' Agreed. • 'Removal of the eight parking spaces...' With restriping planned for that entry/exit at Bascom Avenue we are not clear as to the four spaces to be removed on the north end of the parking aisle. Retail tenants in this vicinity (Wells Fargo Bank, Leh at Albuquerque, and Marshall's) are impacted by loss of parking spaces in this parking field because of the distance from other parking fields. We ask that ycu reserve at this time the requirement that four parking spaces in front of the Leh at Albuquerque be eliminated. • 'Reconstruction and repair Agreed, although, as you know, this work is not scheduled until the summer. Bids for this work are approximately S 107,000. PruneYard Associates intends to include this amount in the bond for incomplete work to be provided to the City. On -Site Landscaping: Agreed. Off -Site Landscaping: Agreed. • The planting plan has been reviewed and modified as to tree locations and species. The cost of this work by Gachina Landscaping (approximately $3,900) will be part of the bond amount. Storm Drain Easement: Agreed. Side Agreement, On -Site Improvements Related to Retail Remodel • This refers to the issues set forth in Steve Piasecki's letter to me dated November 19, 1997, and my letter to Steve dated December 5, 1997. A copy of the plan consisting of 3 pages prepared by Ken Kay Associates and dated 2/19/98 has been provided. As we discussed in the meeting at the City, nn laeua y 29, 1999, we intend to prnrrnd w•th the site related impm—ments tc the parking field in front of Barnes and Noble and the circulation and site improvements adjacent to The Bank of America. These are the improvements in the areas labeled 1 and 2 on the KKA plans. Please note that the improvements in area 1 depicting changes adjacent to Bof A are in response to and in accordance with a sketch provided by Steve Piasecki to KKA early February 1998. We concur with these modifications but note that when Peter Eaklund reviewed the proposed changes with Craig Heckman of KKA on February 13, 1998, he expressed his con -ern of smoothing the radius at Bof, and preferred keeping the right angle turn as a traffic calming devise. This work is currently being priced and contracts for this work will be let promptly. It is unlikely that this work will be completed by the 26"'; therefore the cost of this work will also be added to the bond amount provided to the City. The planting at the base of the pylon sign depicted as area 5 will be completed. We still do not have act ;table plans for areas 3 and 4 and are not proceeding with any additional charges in these two weds until we agree on concepts acceptable to all pa, tir.i. Gloria, thank you for your diligence and professionalism exhibited in administering this complicated project, we all look forward to a successful completion and a fine tenant making its long term home at the PruneYard. Please call me with any questions. Sincerely, ' David R. Word a: Mr. Steve Piasecki W. Kheay Loke Ms. Virginia Unruh hIM. 1.1999 11:46P11 VEMAY ASSOCIATES NO. 309 P.210 .' 'Panasonic FAX 5YST97 FMM NO. 4M 3531M Deb. 25 19" 02:24" P2 AR@GM=LTjm p co#jmmATi" FOR TFe PRuWYAm OWM COMPLEX AND IM RENOVATION PI Wood at the %MNW of: CFG4 Heckow 1045 Son StI IWV O1 son Franc+soe. CA 9419 P "a td by ON D. Coats FeWww y 23.1999 Job X 01-99-015A 1 I'pP. 1.1999 11:46.41 tEt+A'C ` aSSOC IATES --. rap. 309 P. 3,8 FRom : ftwwnac Frog SYVW PIQE PO. : 4W 3531239 r.b. 25 19" FIIt25FM P3 ARPORT01JlrA& REO "e"TIONS FOR THE FRUNEVARC OFFICE COMFIEX APO DNRUCVATM x Wo GOW M Crag Heckm , L opdseaps Architect to address s.vorol subjstts at the prarrrsyerd Office and Iim landsage rwooatnrctkwi Fmjw+ ThOy imicko . 1 Tbs use of structu'ol urbm tree 261 MW (SUTSM) at the Ate. 2. Tres sprciss SAW"tutic". 3. Other pkW clrorrgos. 4. Pnadq of the old Ole.rdor hodys at the north papa lin& d. ft wieaa of Rvadwood arhivors 04 --t to K*-" M 6. Polontid for trww* tin9 tress in confkct with Mhrior rood wideeirrg north of The Outback rest--t. 7. Trot pvtoction at the 3urfoce Porldng Oast of the poridng structure. �Owbw to arrmrge the pwparwtion WaJ installation of ths strvrehred soil Brix is very brief - Tr must be arrargOd ASAP. SOCHMe landscape would be the %Ocld oworweror b Plqw� Wild wow this nrbr since ties arm invshed Mrs .& OWY. I visited the Sheldon Trudging sin today (2-24-49). and food Matt Mews, Mermr reedy to pi "a this wAx and deliver it on a steels nodes (409) 432-OM Ths trw addroese 4 in mm 7 will need bsaedisn attorrIM n prwt wt rests from moop rent dony L The root of the +wt_m anus oddrnaOd later in this rwprt iw deteli Prelim W. hrraa b. Cavre. MAR- 1. I F9 ll 46L1M EfMa a;SCK tAiES ow, NO.309 P.418 F:O'1 P"sonic FAX SYSTRI PAOW No. : 488 35312.38 h. 25 Im e2:X M P4 IMMC1 rJM AECOMM£NOATIOM FOR Ti - FR1R EYARD OFFICE COMAS( APQ IW REWVATM WOW" polr type sf panting sits wera described by Cray Hecknan (Exhibit A) They ore: C9R/►far 1 Pkv la blonds which WIN Conlon tress, @I,- and paanials and have an array of osbI and pi "bowl! blOM the 3 feat dnkp pns and ,sing awnpocrirg sopernt in thaws beds vas not awwidavd efw. caw"ise 2 A new of tees in a paved wallewy. This is o cardition typicd of o strwct toes planting and sinew fo fodlities era ford bsnaotn this surio", auavatien wwW fat caws cafts" a 3 Sawn plot - islands for toed in the parWny W. Coottisa 4 LWW paring let islands with !,wo, dwubs and ynerndcwers. rt. 1. in nsroM r9 "M Wcations and shopat of plat-s which -A 'u udod. I ow fern sits which lend thwnsdw well to ones of the SUT-WL An W901 e01 tMR t site was notd howaw basids town 3, whera 3 frees are t bs planed I rsoofrna theta 3 foot deep pit,10 fost wide ad 1T3 fast loft' be pn @Wed and thrt the VWWS@iV pslynrrsr nebc described in blr fry affics be used in that pit anxw Or@ to thaw SPINAastisfs. lsdailt � t M,M wt that at least oas osarNtisR 3 sits be troatd with the WTSM a VIWL TA tlrot appNastlen, the plo tw pit shs,ld be oecova 01 to a 4 feet srpnavt, and to at least 4 few? dwp. Tt will bs rsaanwy Is yet a NAM" anipecla me this hole to s,eewsmly cowpoct the nixes prtetrlbad• wpv c k toy* 0. Corot. FGW WY 23, ifsr rcp. 1.1999 I1 a1m FErFui PS'II MATES rt0. 309 P.5,8 FRon : panaw.,. FAX srsTe+ 4oG No. : 408 35312.E eb. 25 1993 62:26PM P5 AnORI"nS AL REO)I M00ATtoNs FOR THE pa R4EVARD 0"= COMM- c AND DW RENOVATWN PMrrtws wl_dr win corrldn O wxturs Of pks t types, low a ally 1 iOm 4 sift m W met be a proctkOl sirs fOr ust of SUTsK it win be n cmawy for a asr►ifted arborist from Our office to inspect the 5IJTsM iRe wum at the folloo ng -A a The raw rwdr and soil. (YU soN must be osrtifwd by SON a Platt Labor mforks, SOP! Clara as conforworig to tho sptdflcmtbmw b. Wham it is dovered 10 tho site and before it is iWWkd. c. During installation. d. At trap irwtol "On tirmO. 2. Tm opmM nrlwttt tie w bs +read hors. Thq are w Wva ?o Ebr trod : ve of p°o^k" . ow *" weva watt of Oxparaiva 1b Drums, very t1w year. T%M r'Mdro "m p^m""g annudly in s sits Him this, and mm- yaw$ after arossgive Imtarior thiw", vhldr is tgpkw, they Of"" istt Wow or brarw A spsdn whkh wnrld has fsw of that prsbloU. nOuld reach a dalrW Mryar $ices and is avdkW is vw wood Sy=wAm (Ahliws am 06" 'ya"OOd'i i su ss► that thq be used a a wibOhlunt for EMat in wwtt puts Of the pttjact. U the south pw4dmg lot• a trOe which will pr.vids stow shads for psriad Wq wsuld be qpvPrW*- Chlmsss f Mills Trm (&Oi'WM* �"w� �' � IIIIW it a .@NsbM mad W. bomw b. c..+a, MAR. 1.199E 11:47AM KENKAY ASSOCIATES NO.309 P.618 PAb'M Pan& o tc FRK SYSTEM PFOf No. : 409 35312-7 . eb. a 199E 12:27A9 P6 ARIGRIQA.TIAAL W.000#040ATIONS FOR TW FRU14:YAR0 OFFICE CO&OM AND 1W RENOVATION how aria oak am japonica to ApW erioapA)i%, Wb*W am' Dwarf Ore" fo Dow *'ashi" Navel Owgs of" pi A& to rp*fd k lm-*w lfjm wjK4w iertoAlWradoAAw'Summ'a'''Yshry''(avoiWoe from swar"t Nay in is Sal) Er jwWAWedeot+iwvto i°K'1MoWtaim' or'nN,peri y' 4. A a" flo OW Oleaedmr had$" 400 - tiem of that hadpo it quits possibleif tho prmaas is properly dons at the right tiara (March} 3tap a. bs sups *a at least 4 WV dWowtar steers anm left at the bade of the plant to mr Mwa support of fhs femos b. cut i/3 of Hem vwrtieal emrrss to 1M tsU due AnI the to gml dlarster comma to cut. c. cut all rvradning cmrras to 2 }' taN. a rose a8 tulm rsmt sae+wrs which amens at ties gland f- fw hNsa by A6"4aa SMI i%4ctism usirg 4 Ns_ & mabsM 22-14-14 per 100 gdlena wmtar to apply 20 vWWw per ON*. g Coll Olasndaraphids Nldd mef • q"mr M April by nlwin! Lady bid ba'stles an neislwrnd lied rn the aewrrb* Purdwaa ywng bow froo W WaWt y Nhs Arbiooe. g. tsmdeed ",a w wd fa * to HWj wy 27 to avoid a I ss),amt ereing ssvarwl dlifw'amt cuh!varm of Wdwoo& MmmOdteA _summer. sdpgyAwppo m sms'Aptw Mus t Lrrrf AYwe� 2!, r999 moo/ W.. aw"s D. COO1s. t1�e,ary rrn. 1.19q� 11 17AM NEr*AY ASSOCIATES NO.309 P. 7,0 FWr : Pb+awa is FAX SYSTBI IN ROE 00 ND. : 43531238 �b. 25 1999 82:2WM P7 AI1fiDAILIX'nM . WW#A0WTl0N5 FOR Ti,* PJI A&VADD OfF a WMRV( ANti "UNDVATWN 50FAmiff Amps pi wors ' scippKl' sopwok awpprhsms' Siwgwm' 2 Sokw' Ths lattr my only be avoilobls in 5 Olen or 15 gdfan sizes. S. wAomM Irses fvm the pe,llbag blonds north of The artbwk Ttww era two Cwwy Islerd Plus !wool (/beer arwrisisi+s) and loom Chun. Ella ("jwW wwfo" in idwlds. Thew am Mona. spd m— yhs pfines nova tnl* &mwtwo of 12-14 end we 50' tall Thar are in good hmoffh LWW*ewtely, it would coat mbaut $24; = each to t. oa wpismt thwm to anethr port of the one (I nantly obldiwd a bid frm j , to nave "for Canny 1"d pinoo} T MS sealant of money cajid. in my opi+ion, be be! 10 opnt on 1+MW !root a. pretestima for 2 a ve trame and ems moldev s wes of the Poo" Mt. Sevwel snap newt be ldwn to aosun survival and 1100" of !hoot three tremr during and after od jmW—Wtrwct4w a. The team should be fortilised dowlg Mom* (Whw the Olooldsrs are p wsV) by injecting fr*W b * 22-14.14 fitrtiNaor at 4 lb. Per 100 p rww watt to 11%W 2W ON Pr the into all loom. with ageNd sail within 10' of tla lnelk b. Cover dl ~ whwdt will rot be pD.Md wiythyin�10' mf the tnaliw with own J"s as from a tnn thippr. c. Imstell M++g~ to each planar sate. Wv wrya►ion ►fps ta'allihea nwy we aerams,*. teat sysnra ban mar be erected !award the tnnlhl. d. Refers any mars quf/wamt actirily ocanarS wr "On treoo place tonal es shmwn in the ea", fc C. F br. llwrw D. a w. Fainawr n, im 1.1999 11:48AM YEWAY ASSOCIATES NO. 309 P.R�a MOM': ftrtawmc FAK SYSTEM FHM NO. ! 4W 3531239 eb. 25 19" 62:29PM PO ANDOWLTMAL MODRAD"U" FOR TW PRUWVARD OFFICE COMM ANN DN FAMVATWN R"PCKL* x6m"Ild so,% D6 Cuft Epcbmrw Amomp"m ow Uff"flf co"*"Ww ExW A. 6. C Tpwgw"owmm I Trmcompws lMwMyAd*enW swok PI on w owns 0. cww fift w V 93. IM Fill I.IaSon. c FP)K SYSTEM '� P14TE N0. : 408 3531236 Mar. 10 1999 11:34fT1 PZ BARRIE D. COATE and ASSOCIATES Horticultural Conaultonta 406-353-1052 Fax 406-354.3767 23936 5a 11 nod, Lm Caro., CA 93M FIELD NOTES AT SHELTON TRANSFER COMPANY MARCH 2, 1999 Prepared at the Request of: Ken Kay Associates 1045 Sonaonte Street, #321 San Francisco, CA 94111 Fax:415-956-4522 Site Visit by: Barrie 0. Coate March 2,1999 Job 001-99-015-A FROM : Par%aS— c FAX SYSTEM PHONE NO. : 408 3531238 Mar 10 1999 11:34HM P3 FIELD NOTES AT-%4LTON *MAt.LSFtlt CO.. FOR THE PRUNEYARD CENTER IU mixing chief is custom -making the rock and soil mix for the Pmowyord Shopping Center Project. He prepared a mixture using the following; 50 tons # - 1' granite Wm ry rock 7.5 tons of clay loam soil 30 bs. of Broadleaf P4 This is making about 60 tons. A truck with two trailers can carry 25 tons per bad, The final product composed of the ingredients previously noted does not leave enough soil in the mix to perform the function for which it is designed. Thb is no doubt due to the soil we used having slightly more sand than the WNW. I decided to ask the mixing supervisor to add 30% more soil to the mix, making a combination of 11 cubic yards of soil, rather than the 7.5 origin* specified. We added additional Proodleof P4 to be proportionate to the added soil. The new proportions must be 50 tons of rock, I tons of sandy loan and 45 pounds of Broadleaf P4. Respectfully submitted, Borne 0. Coo Owsh Enclosures; Assumptions and limiting Conditions Cr_- Sim 3hsra, City of Campbell (408-066-2143) Khsay locks, Wesson-Carnarstwrc (Fax 650-372-9093) A we W. N740 D. G1ete Mach Z. ifs! FEB.11.1999 3: 32PM FEWAY DISSOCIATES NO. 117 P.2Z3 K E v a A Y A S S 0 C I A T E S L4.4--p•Ar hkKt— u,bu Plrig 1045 S— 3— MEETING NOTES SmA6521 Sn F..•d.e• Dave: February 10, 1999 (41%)9MAO! (415) 95I AM Fu PmjftV Nawe ard Master Plea - Caltrams Highway 17 PPAICY9901.0 It-K.VSFad.— awd Nwwrbar: 9801.01 li b r_ t.o A.su. APA.Clru C—C R.T t -k— ASIA Ar: Caltrans in Oakland Ork wa/ar. Guy Crites Awaadm. Kheay Lake, Wilson Comerslone Precom Walia. Calhans Quan Chen. Ca n,= Betsy Barsamian Tetuan, CalUUS Gloria Seiars, City of Campbell Guy Crims, KenKay Associates Issnss Dfsewssod. t Kheay Lose (KL) and Guy Crites (GC) introduced the project. Betsy Barsnniaa Teman (BBT) said that the new trees must be 6m/19.69' bats from the gourd rail. 3. Gloria Sciam (GS) presenned the City of Campbell's need for the new trees to be 20' back (toward HWY 17) from the property lindfence at the Pruneyard, to accommodate a tune City storm drain. 4. A discussion began concerning tree locations between GC. KL and GS. GS Wlicd that we could shift four UM out of the zone described In 3 (above), and that this would fulfill the City of Campbell's future needs. 3. A ditotuuion began concesing planting tree oo a slope condition, the health of the trees over time, irrigation of the trees and maintenance of the trees. The following crommects were Doted: • Planting on the slope is not ideal but can be done as shown in the Caltrans Standard Plans H4, July, 1997. • The trees need adequate spacing (15' - 25' a mcommmded by Caltrans) and ferlrl Z@MM to r main bealthy over am. • The unseen- system will be tree bubblers and a gate valve shall be provtdad rEB.11.1999 3: 32Pn vEta.Av ASSOCIATES 1*). 117 P.313 Mastics Nair 4abrwwy 10,1999 Par for emergency shut off by Caltrans. • The maintenance of the trees shall be a landscape maintenance agreement between the City of Campbell and Wilson Cornerstone. The City of Campbell will submit that agreement witi the encroachment permit for review by Caltrans. 6. GS indicated that if the arcs, tree planting was encumbered by stegr slope ownddioas, the City of Campbell may consider the use of a smaller size tree in a few instances where necessary. 7. OC pointed out that the current plan shows a 24" box Sequoia sempervirens 'Soquel', we would use a 15S or 5g tree as per slope condition if absolutely nace"tey- 8. Pceethir Walia (PW) discussed the time Brae of the permit process as outlined in the Pacrowhed Permit Application guide. 9. Quan Chan (QC) discussed the need for an access point (a gate) along the fence that separates the Ptmcyard from Highway 17 casemm. For maintenance pImposer, BBT indicated that if there is not a gate is the fence the State of California will become involved in the process of providint an access gate in the fence, this would be decided on in Sacramento. 10. BBT, PW and QC said that if the City of Campbell submits the Encroachment Permit, the processing fee will be waived. 11. The items that need to be addressed according to BBT, PW and QC are as fuUcws A. An Irrigation Plan (MttriaPeet-Inches) B. The plan presented "Landscape Buffer ® State Route 17" Is to be in metrWfeet-inches, and change the Tree Planting Detail to match the Caltrans Standard Plan H4, July, i997 detail. C. Provide QC out (1) 8-W" x 1 I" reotuctiaa of "Landscape Buffer ® State Route 17"; one (1) 8-1r1" x I I" Vicinity Map; one (1) 8-1/2" x 11" Site Context Map. End of Meding Notes If there are soy comments or corrections, please contact KenKsy Associates within five (5) days of receipt of tbese meeting note. cc: Kbuy Lake, Wilson Cornerstone Betsy Bartamian Temam. Caltrans Glaris Sonars, City of Campbell CITY OF CAMPBELL January 29. 1999 Community Development Department Current Planning David Word, Vice President Kheay Loke. Vice -President Wilson Cornerstone 2929 Campus Drive. Suite 450 San Mateo, CA 94403-2590 FAX (650) 345-7619 Re: Summary and Issue Identification for Certificate of Occupancy of Office Development (SDP 98-01) Dear David and Kheay Thank ,you for meeting with us on January 28. 1999 to discuss the outstanding conditions of approval related w the office development. The meeting helped to clarify the status of each issue and to deternune a course of action that will allow occupancy of the new office building As we discussed, several of the conditions must be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the office building, while a bond will be sufficient for other improvements. The following is a summary of the outstanding issues and their status: Campisi Way Extension: Discussions with Wilson Cornerstone and the property owner of the Aloha Apartments have not resulted in an agreement to sell the right -of -way necessary for the extension of Campisi Way, Bi;l Helms will be contacting the property owner to address this issue. Wilson Cornerstone must provide a letter of credit or a cash payment in the amount of S600,0004uly February 18. 1999 in accordance with the previously approved street improvement agreement. This condition is a requirement prior to occupancy of the new office building. Creek Trail Access: Until the access to the Los Gatos Creek trail is available from the Campisi Way extension, the existing Creek trail access from the Pruneyard must be reconstructed. Plans for the relocation and reconstruction of the trail access must be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval. Reconstruction of the trail access must be completed prior to occtipancyy of the new office budding. On -Site Circulation Improvements/Pavcment Reconstruction: On -site circulat.on improvements including the following are required to be implemented. These improvements consist of the following: • Conversion of the one-way driveway (in only) on the east side of the Outback Steakhouse to a two- way driveway. • Removal of the last two parking spaces at the end of each parking aisles directly behind the Outback Steakhouse (eight total) to provide room for truck deliveries without blocking the drive aisles. • Directional striping starting at the west side of Tower ❑ to the most westerly drive aisle that continues to the parking garage. • Removal of the eight parking spaces near the northern driveway on Bascom Avenue (4 parking spaces in front of Left at Albuquerque and 4 parking spaces, on the north end of the parking aisle directly across from the other parking spaces removed-2 on each side) to prevent vehicles from backing into the triveway at the northern entrance. • Reconstruction and repair of all failed pavement as identified with City staff. 70 North Ftot Street - Campbell, Calif.-,. vsooe. 1423 rt, 409 966 1140 FAX 408. 066. 8181 roo 408. 866 2790 Conditions of Approval fo, ..,suance of Certificate of Occupancy SL., 98-01 January 29, 1999 On -site Landscaping: Due to the unforeseen circumstances involving the removal of pavement, the landscape plan must be referred to a consulting arbonst for review and recommendation. Approval of the on -site landscaping plan by the Planning Division is pending subject to a comprehensive arborist report evaluating potential landscapmg impacts to existing trees. If additional pavement work affecting trees is anticipated now or in the future, information and a site plan identifying these locations should be provided to the consulting arborist for inclusion in the arborist report. The arbonst's review shall identify all trees that will be impacted as a result of landscaping plan prepared by Ken Kay and Associates or from other site improvements proposed. If trees are iubiect to damage or loss. the arborist shall identify the size and species of trees and replacement trees to equally offset the value and quality of trees removed or anticipated to be removed. The arbonst shall also include specifications for a structural urban tree soil mix and planting details for planting new trees. The structural urban tree soil mix shall be used for all new tree plantings or relocated treei associated with the landscaping plan. All on -site landscaping improvements must be completed prior to the occupancy of the new office building. Off -Site Landscaping: A landscape plan for the Caltrans right-of-way adjacent to the Pruneyard must be approved by the City and a completed encoachment permit application permit submitted to Caltrans prior to the occupancy of the office building. Pruneyard representatives must complete the application requirements, and the City will sign the permit application as the applicant. A review of the preliminary landscape plan by the City Engineer indicates that the plan must be modified to eliminate planting on the flat area at the toe of the slope isee enclosed plan). It may create more difficulty in establishing trees on sloped areas. therefore, we are requesting that this plan be forwarded to the consulting arbonst for review and recommendation. A bond for construction of the actual improvements will be accepted by the City to prior to occupancy subject to a specified time frame for implementation of the improvements. Storm Drain Easement: 1 will check with Harold Housley regarding the status of the legal description and the Quit Claim provided and advi, _ accordingly. This condition must be completed prior to oc,.apancy. Side Agreement; On -site Improvements related to Retail Remodel: While not a condition of approval for the office development. ,he site related improvements to the area near Bames and Noble were agreed upon to improve on -site circulation and to address landscaping deficiencies associated with the retail remodel. David indi-sated that Ken Kay and Associates had completed a site plan showing the proposed improvements and that plan would be forthcoming. It is our desire that the improvements take place at the same time the new landscaping is installed for the office development. If you have any questions regarding this matter. please do not hesitate to contact me at (408) 866-2143 S`iinnnccerely. AICP Planner II/Project Manager cc Bill Helms. En+ironmenial Services Manager Harold Housley. Land Development Engineer EEB.23.1999 2:34PN KEWAY .SLY IATES N0.238 P.2,10 BARRIE D. COATE and ASSOCIATES Horticultural Coaaltants 408-353.1052 Fax WS-30-123/ nW P a f A.M Lw Cnn. CA rnu RECOMMENDATIOM FOR TREE REMOVAL AT THE PRUNEYARD SIiOPMG CID M CANOBELL PRUNEYARD wN COURTYARD PRUNEYARD PLACF, Preps; al the Rewast of C-* Iie., Ke dUy ✓k AsaobaM. Landscape ArcWta is 1045 Sanaotne Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Site Ytait by Barrie D. Coae lamay'26, 1999 Job 001-99-011 rEB.23.1999 2: 35Pn kEM PY RSSM IATES it �_�3s P.3 10 RECOMOMAMIG FOR TRIM R04DVAL AT THE PRUNLIYAPM SHOWING CPNlFR aFRUNBYARD EM COURTYARD PRUPBYARD Pt.ACF G�.2., Awkw on immaryl266, Mr. Hae1®ro 011ed VD ask me to mat him at ft No-Ywd affected Canter. fo tosp d four mature, Chinese Olm (UL_ par fi0a) by cmuwt m of a new building at the sate. The WM of the impaotioo was to determine wbether these t, sad several others flea cmM be preae vad dur* the planed conomsetkm lc6vitY Whit alma I WSW tees Odw Chmese boxeselms wboh al mayA be paw � That subjeer wdll by this cmaudim am 90=4 damage adi be addressed in this report as wdl. Dommim lrmter iL rru Dmn CODairtt"m of L IO 00w b aldmg a the %umyad cm elms s eta mammy to remove paving and ph"etruauree aaad Siva. ,Us Ms rmuWd in etptafiog a W-hat block of Aftw ual roots *� very tint atlas wfppaf stru�e resanea and The mvAh �� to be aWponed by isthat thra of the trhave B ees roady beSa fiU Thew frees sage bawom 10 and 14-iaob diameser ueh, ewkh 6om : 0 to 30 fast is braaeb eptand. The, trace ere at lout 25 yaae old and woo 7 wWW in raised tile- I hoed planter banana WP =bnA Y 2 feet above the watmmdu* pa'ameet gtsds This rewwW root anon has, over the yeas, ty, 1, 4 a root >gruame amtposcd aatrely of tale st uawal tow %ram a radangtda Much- ioaide of fee pbatar bm m with a fen 2- dismenr rood *,ed out under the adjaard fimsa grade pavhkg 13uritp theiuk fist IO yeas of life those trees were °werfb° � � � IVO � at,,Cmtas with vary boary sod-wagbts and a high potemd been so beavily thinned for so many yam the the Mud— it not completely ootreerabk. evm whb the beet of pnmm& The waaioa of tratQlantiog these trey tray arise. Thal would not be poasrbt seta the vWmK,arm bet 0 the very omart ad woody rootbsA in " �h the very t,� canopy wow male a impafskble to suooeaafully transp4at thssa trees without leyaa Beeline steer the prt+oass is oontpiate. The ooeditioo of the fan arms which brave rrees dy had the mmunding anrrn+e nmwvsd dsaemtraaa tba fsa cieaiy. Gwo INSAS a n r t0 me that the ody whtteiao is to col only rom all lbws toots w o b Ke c due to recant retooval of the planter reaarve dte fan trans which ere curraly baardous Iwo" 26. 14H pwpww by. Boa* D. COOK EEB.23.1999 L: rpm KEWAY ASS)CIATES rr'.--39 P.a 10 REC MEMATEM FM TRIG REIaDVAL AT TIM PRUNEYARD SF OPMG CEWIM CAbaWl1., PRUNEYARD INN COURTYARD PRUNEYARD PLACE sod pavement anfu s ad*" 6M but to give serious 0004114eratim to raomirrg others which ate Jron bepasiag to aunt serious structmd dsmW. Is my opisios, the corAct caused by the PK=dW caummum activity and the large class which have already bees impacted by that 00mtructwo rsaUY offer m aPPOMIMdY to sown a problem w bwb *add have vested whetber this omxU bm were WOM Plana of Dot, ire., the Structural damage awed by *AMC taaanre elms. Rrossmans/aslwat I a"mt that not only the four currently hazardous elms which Is x had rsoant comauct oo activity orotmd than, but the other mature alma armed, the ==U* buUdiop aewrd which pavement was to be replaced be removed and TgAw d with a spoon which win to cane this same damage is the fidma. The obvious reg aompo t of a reple0anent species would be to Psovidn a similar Ahaed ,bade arvb0musa, ant case pavemem damage, (at hest m the first 20 to 40 yams), serve the same gmaal filrret ucal propose of then elan, and perhaps mat praedeak be ounroady available is the trade. Whet all of those tog m mmu are 40=daed, the only spscm) which cs maan of sham is Yarwood London plane tree (PMarawrs OCN#W rs'Ysrvood'). Sion fine spedn saa of thb cukWa are VAulabic and A ON Farb maims a,e without brmkmg pevemrmt, b almost aronly disease RMc asd insect sad pat fee, sod as easily be prated to nay height or fbtm above 30 fat. I teooamood that Ysrw0od rywmma be codes to replace, sot mly the Rw trees which are currently hatmdow s4 in my opodo0. most be removed, but other alms of this almage age which would be sfficted later by removal of ad)aosm pavement At Zhome TAW IC Indad, than ehm are roomed, similar coaidaadon about the fidwe of tbn ohm pynpad two years ago aroutrd other buildaya should be oossidaed as well Those trvs am OU Yong cough to be rmwved sod trsosplaMed by a wholosele ardary need WArA they aim 4Pa to a Patin trade fir nplscameat Ysrwood syamoren AN than trade I sr*VK ym► oomot valley C"d Thawry, tdophose 0 (510) 962-2425 , or B: ethic{ Trabud Nursery, Rich Hanley, aI 650-851-4TM to discuss that Potastial if that is . f interest to so parties ooenrsed. RespecdAy submitted. AtAdk.�a, Gib Barrie D. Coate Psspasd ey. bank D. Coale, Mrawy 26. 19" FEB.23. 1999 2: 36PM KENKAY PSSOCIATCS NO.230 P.5/10 RBC06691MAMM PW nM REWCYVAL AT TM PR )DWARD SBCWM C9NM ACM PNMJ. MMYARD m CQ)RTYARD MLWYARD RACE BnrAn Boobama Atam;wom nd Limiting cooeitim FMOWWRl•Ankacmdl6 h. )26,Dw FEB.23.1999 2: 36PM r.EwA, ASSOCIATES "0. 238 P.6, 10 K E N K A r A 5 5 0 C I A T E 5 U W—p. A.dittn+r+ tern S..w Stnw FIRLD REPORT 5,.ei.a1 Sa Fr..rw.. Febtuary 18, 1999 Cddw.k 9at11 Doft: I{ISI 9%.44'3 (415)9A-4Sn ru To: Kheay Loke, Wilson COMMtOne x..0 SFe..l— %—.& J. Km ASIA, AM. CNU From: Craig Heckman C,.ir R T. K-kw.n ASIA ho*at Nsaa pruneyard Of iicefinntHwy 17 a+s1 NrwMr: 9801/02/03 Meeting Notes: Foruary 16, 1999 : Bum Coate, Arporist AAV7dmroc watben, Webter Builders Craig Heckman, KKA lhmpoa: Review of Glaris Sekwa's lenarary 2e Lester Office 1. Use of snucnwW urban Tree soil mix is most apptoptine at the tree cut-outs iD trout of Tower 3. Use of this Dux is lass appropri�a�te� f.o,.r, r,,a,i,,s,er1d planter conditions at the budding perimeters: due existing lu)der�d utdrty constrait". Banc aiB recommend that the urban tree soil mix be Owd at one perking lot cut out a a pilot project to evaluate the effectiveness of the mix site wnw a site using the conveatianal backfill Potters. 2. The specifications for the urban nee soil mile arc inehtded as an atlaebm09 to this teppt Bane recommeads a continuous 3 foot deep erosa aecu"D extending the attlre length of de nee cutout yea, see exhibit, attached. 3. Tree species substimuons. • At the tree cut outs in trout of Tower 3, subrRtute Platanur "eW la 'Yarwood' far ULnra parvow1a bo have been remorod, replace • At Tower I. wbae existing Ufaws parvifo with PloMW aceroaa 'Yartvood'. • At the parking lot cut nun south and bath of Tower 3. substitute X-Ireareria bipinnara fu Ulnlar parvifolia. 4. Other Plant changes: to Btrxur'Wintergreen' • Change Bran nricrophylla MP°Atco • Change Salvia pelpi to Salvia microphyuc FEB.23.1999 2: 361-t, KEtKAY ASSOC IRTES ._ NO.236 P.7,10 held Notes Pebrw ery M 19" Pm' 2 5. Barrie will reeorn gad a hard Pruning and fertilizing procedure for the Oleanders along the north drive lance line. This procedure will reinvigorate the shrubs and eliminat^ the existing unsightly coudition. 6. Tree substitutions: Yam, Cbangc Ul w parvi)Wia to Pbrmess ace,§Wi • Change dwarf orange to jbjihiGaG011avel Ozanne • Change &ash perdrb to 7iissonla laurvn • Change Meg -liar soalandiaa to M.$. 'Rustics Rubs' 7. Other Plant • Bums mucrophyilalapor"to Barer 'Wintagrew, • Change Salvia greggii to .Salvia microphAa • Chmge Erigemn kwviaskiww to E.k 'Vmheini Highway 17 -- g. Use more than one rertwood variety to avoid a variety monoculture. Use: Soquel • Simpson Silva • Abws Blue • Santa Cruz 9. Existing tree no. 3. change namc from Palo Verde to Parkiosonia Island 7,mes near Outback loadig arcs 10. Two vds iu& lWV Canary Island Pines appear to be in good condition. One existing, large evergreen clm has been poorly PtuIWA will contiane to be a problem am. Its canopy has been hataricaY incorrectly Pruned and is a potential hazard: the root system may eventually, cause damage to pavement and curbs. Barrie will comment further on there trees. gRisting Mebleuca mod Olives at Surfaco East of Parking Structure 11. Protective tree measures per the specs is required. Barrie will comment further on ate protection. easel.: Soil ?Jane Exhibit, dated February 18. 1999 Plant Lists (2) Urban Tree Mix Specification cc: Attendees Ron McLester, H+WI Dee Sanders. Gocbiaa EEB.23.I999 2: 37PM HErM.Ar ASS-CIATES NO.230 P.9. 10 Plant List V" .tort 14 n comm 14=9 mm Mdn TOM Culp SSM C�Irifen Cpmr 24' Bmt Sm Hm 012 Al Odtw wwgw 9ww MW Svm HN Olin W Bm 0L11 WR ow w.q+w Imm A W' Swne m Ofi" 2r Bm nmm hrt PITR130 pw pa—aw"N dw P, 13PL F-V O.C- r1A YAR Frrr aew 0 " 7&weee Leedm Free Tm 24" S+m FOD ORA PGA-+pr r-aw Fm Pie Ir BOX POT NRi Pq w - ImN-' LewbK* F"dw won "m cla pn~ , 0 A16ei ArFU - Lmf num 2P Bm FRU TED Aww yadmm a Arbsw' Yabim Fwwm t cbm1 w 11m rYR CAL ppm edA ) Tumb w' CbLvAd w FM 24" Bm UL1 PAR i/irr/w"om E"amm 24" Bm mcm atr +0``t Tw�,�Vtyt��T 2,-Bm BiJx>dx Now. wk+a/MyM,�r— Bmwoot 3 NIL Sw Ple BNC OOM sww b w. Cwereee' DwtWf Fawdlme I OL r O.0 FAT MF FdNAPGWM igapL— S pl. Na OLE No Obwtdu' w1 dr' S PL 94r O.C. Frr EUO podowrr artwtiotdw Frow1 , S pL IT-V O.C. RAP IND AwAMIpM *.Am C7re' rm HN"dmn S pL ota RHO AZA NAoiiwNww.d.NMN AArtbr' Am" S PL rs" O.C. ROS OFF R7r NAw' RONOWY S rL Tor O.C. RYL cON Zybo mAl— Co w—, Dwwf ;4ib S pL 31-V O.C. Pwaay1SY TAV DEN L&VArA%NDiwww r Lawwdw 1 SL I'-3.O.C. SAL0118 /- W.0'..■ M1690y�rwrSW I'1. r-rO.C. SRS AUT SMAM* ANNNiwdm Moe Moor Orr I pL 11-V O.C. vhm Doom Dbec a itte01rN1NN41 Stud - Red 7VMpw VON S'L Sw FLU FIC rm Ffwspnrr Cwgwt Fit S PL B!D HBL, Hato is k Nwdlpo" Nwdiemt 1"p S Fri G emd(A"w TRA W I ML 3' O.C. MOREL )%wn Ae0 WMAWO ' NNedlrpom Ivy Flom Fier P O.0 ArMtr *rood Colo. To be wrAtd by LndNape Atchma 4 Pbw S" O.0 RlmryrA t"ee 4c, Planting Details u.r. sow VAbm Camrfloce Camtpl 4 Cahbob w` JMN[AY ASEOaATES die 2of_ TEMOONI *`� ^�rAvw WYr� • W. Z38 P. 10,10 _ Plant List xv aww.tP* cam..,%w aw hots M--b T"m crr JAM a..F a.rw.+ta.1.t... s+•11. ff. Ph. CrF Cww*WIafN �Ii7N Dwrrow.P isPL a.nw. Qlraas.� curve 4..�.......... t.+wgF.. ��..� son. Otststn aw..p.s- Mir ON. z.-a. T.N. a....+ own* �...,... �. mr we m" tr a. !. Fr. .aaaa.i ,TF1 LMA TIL MANUN t h R A © At.rtola nottoc Mow. tN a� s� s.eri. WK" D+a. r.ww.. ra...Dry 81L IOL S..Ph. rpOlt 11Mf ar. IA�...or~ IJ" n"Ift I at rf o.a. awP.ot waam MM-Uw.w.. a—mopom is Pt. son. �LUlftil� l�R� otaatl. a...7..tw.aar W. upt s.Fw wwou Awh wort.wh6.' crew SPt. TO O.C. rwocoo w...r.....tw..a... N...TFr. tsar. son. TIr im pw.I W-01 w 14 is Pit so 8 MTOa Ate-... Nift To Vworod Tda. SpL it-raC. RRACrA atr+++r.kAhmam, hM.No.t.. IPt Tro.c. AMAZA /rA%WWhw.r.w*.r.• AXON SPL rI-o.c. rot o MO -f w-m I ,&AM I Pl 7vor- xncar Wofoas.wwT•r�• Owrxyt.m swr T4*o..c. IAV OW em ate L-..Y. i.r ur Awr.....wa •rw. C-,-' Fwwi. at.. 1 at rr Dc Whirr ar..U...w Aw hft..0... t't 1'ro.c. ©vr. O.YCAL a>~rro.mwqw.ir Vii.Ttwpwvw sod. ns....a f pie onur oftwo l.d...Y Now •a.a Tumpu vi. sit sw•b Dwft-a.pw ncwa Pa .6 cow"1% sat 71...wa.F.w i iDIM t FY..M.W W d*.wl' N-dwwwh7 SPt Ti.waorpw Storm l•M.t.- Piet 1nuh. lot son. Tw1....a.p.t WUNN ati..w..w 01...wwwk IS F.I. 11a...d1.pma Guwaa/ c"w MA MS /.-r...l. Simi a. I PI. T o.c. "now— I.y ► -nr P oc. Fie./ w1i.P Q Aaawd. 5....i Odr To 6, ubt.t by .• r.. P ox. I Planting Details °itwamcmigiskm � no C=WbRI . aueXW. N. XM4XAY ASSOCIATES a.. •urns S. a"'uM'ws't tr_..w..rF L6.1 ,.. 3 of 3 OF C,t,4q t CITY of CAMPBELL Community Development Department Current Planning December 11, 1998 Ms. Jeanne Shook-Arterbeny Pruneyard Associates 1999 S. Bascom Avenue. Suite 200 Campbell, CA 95008 Re: Allcwable Restaurants at the Pruneyard DearJeanne: The Master Use Permit (UP 94-19) granted by the Nanning Commission established 18 restaurant uses at the Pruneyard. The addition of Buca de Beppo would bring the total number of restaurants operating at the P ineyard to 17. Ad,litionally. we recogn":!e that the square footage allocated for Buca's is equ'valent to the space formerly occupied by Martha;. 1f you have any questions or comments, Plcase do not hesita•a to contact me 2t (408) 866-: 140. Sincerely, Gloria Sciara. UCP Planner 11 70 North Font Street Campbell, Callf6rnia 91009 1423 T L 408 866. 2140 W 408. 866.6341 rno 408.666,2790 ., I A T E S September 17. 1998 Ms. Gloria Sciara Campbell Building Department RECEIVED City of Campbell 70 N. First Street S F "� 2 2 1998 Campbell, CA 95008-1423 CITY OF CAMPBELL Re: Prnneyaed Place PLANNING DEPT. Dear Ms. Sciara Related to the outstanding conditions of approval for the Pruncyard Place Office Tower and Garage. we submit the following tems: I. Conditions No. 7 & 21: Site Plan of the entire Pruncyard Complex with areas of paving repairs marked off and a schedule for makin- the repairs. lhc�e areas weft agreed upon at our joint inspection on September 2, 1998. 2. Condition No.11: We attach 5 copies of the proposed redwood trees buffer along Ilighway 17 for your review and submittal to Caltr ms. Additionally these items have been previously submitted to you: !i r I. Condition No. 2b: Samples and photographs of the garage roof the s.lach you have confirmed as acceptable. 2. Condition No. 18: The Street Improvement Agreement is fully executed. Conditions No. 30 & 31: Our architect. Bomberger and Wor5tell, has submitted to you revised plans of the enclosures of the utility area, showing vine plantings and enclosure material. We will submit similar information on the trash compactor area. You had als- requested a copy of the NPDFS permit which is attached. Pruncyard Inn: As an update, unfortunately we will not be abk to reuse any of the salvaged wood columns because they are too short and partially decayed. We will be purchasing and installing new rough -sawn umber columns which will be painted to match the existing columns at the Inn. Please call if you have aay questions. l Sincerely, Khcay Lo " Vic, eresidc i KUdI cc: David Word, Pruncyard Associates LLC Ron Mcl-cstcr, Bomberger & Worstell, Inc. William Wilson & Associates 2929 Campus Drive, Suite 450 San Mateo, CA 94403 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: 08/24/98 1,1�11 ItE FROM: Kheay Loke AUG 2 6 W8 TO: Gloria Setara - Campbell City Planning Department Ron McLester - Homberger - Worstell CITY OF CAMPBELL David Word - William Wilson & Associates PLANNING DEPT. RE: Pruneyard Place & Garage - Conditions of Approval CC: On August 19. 1998, Kheay Loke . Gloria Scmra and Ron McLester met to review the status of the Conditions of Approval included in Ordinance No. 1955 providing for the development of the Pruneyard Place and Garage. The following items were identified as still outstanding as of o/I9198 CONDITION NO. COMMENTS # 2b Garage Materials and Color • Garage roof ule color to be submitted by HWI in a week # 5 Final Site Plan • Are the spaces at Lett at Albuquerque and The Outback addressed'? Is Outback planning on an expansion'? Call Tom Lis to chuck on design work done Parking and Driveways • Related to condition #21(below) # I 1 Offsue Landscaping - Redwood Trees • Campbell wants trees along the entire west property line as part of the tree - lined frontage on Highway 17 • Need to coordinate with Bill Helms • Get a landscaping plan to Campbell for their review prior to submittal to Caltrans # 18 Campisi Way Agreement • Execution of the agreement is in progress • David Word has initiated contact with the owner of Aloha Apts, awaiting a meeting William Wilson & Associates 2929 Campus Drive, Suite 450 San Mateo, CA 94403 # 19 Los Gatos Creek Access • Gloria to check if access is this deleted due to Campisi Way extension # 21 Replacement of Pavement Surfaces • Need to schedule walk this with Glona • Try 9/2 at 8 am - coordinate with Virginia • Need details of existing base rock design # 27 Modified Storm Drainage Easement • Need legal easement recorded • Check Mark Thomas if this is dc-te # 30-31 Utilities & Garbage Collection Enclosure • Use Secure - Guard Fence / Green 5i8" • Plant vines • Submit blow up plans and fence cut- sheet to Glona # 36 Car detailing station • Notify in letter our intention to delete • we have a year to reinstate NOTES: 1. KL to get to Glona • Set of half size Office & Garage & Inn plans • NPDES permit 2. Caltrans trees is crmcal due to anticipated long Caltrans approval process 3. Glona ok w, garage opening without all landscaping completed. 4. Inn decorative columns • Agreed that Inn expansion will match existing non -decorated columns • KL to write to Glona re: how many timber posts we are salvaging for reuse r U` o a- Q-- iijj W W.<I�o 6igqy4lei1 - 3 n N 3AV WO:)SV9 HInOS - J \I + LI �Y a 80 ]i ` Ll J � m �i �1 AVM 3 3 a 3 [ l 3 1 n 0 l CITY of CAMPBELL Public Works Department RECE�VED August 18.1998 AUG 19 M8 Mr. David R. Word C17y OF CAM Prtmeyard Associates, LLC P(AIV 1Q p ECG 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 200 EPf Campbell. CA 95008 Re: Campisi Extension Street Agreement Dear David: Enclosed for your records is one fully executed copy of the Agreement for the extension of Campisi Way. We look forward to working with you on this important project that will significantly improve access to the Pruneyard Center and enhance traffic circulation in the immediate area. Please keep us informed of your progress toward acquisition of rights -of -way for the street extension from the Aloha Apartment property. If we can be of any assistance, please contact us at 866-2150. Sincerely, Blr.. Acting Public Works Director Enclosure cc: Bernard Strojny. City Manager Bob Kass, Public Works Director Steve Piasecki, Commututy Development Director 70 North flat Street Campbell, California 91008 1433 rn 408 866 _ISO r 408 376.0958 M, 409.066, 1790 At CAh CITY of CAMPBELL Community Development Department Current Planning August 10, 1998 Kheay Loke, Vice -President William Wilson & Associates 2929 Campus Drive. Suite 450 San Mateo. CA 94403-2590 FAX (650) 345-7619 Re: Building Permit 98-652/Addition of Freestanding Generator Dear Mr. Loke: The Community Development Department has reviewed the above referenced plans. It is our conclusion that due to the location and/or size of the proposed generator and trash compactor enclosure that landscaping of the structures (except for door locations) shall be made a condition of approval for issuance of th^ ,uilding permit. Landscaping should consist of vines, with groundcover or shrubs. At. addendum to the landscaping plan may be submitted to address this matter. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at (408)866-214?. Sincerely. Gloria Sciara, AICP Planner II cc: David Word, Vice -President Pruneyard Associates, LLC. !999 S. Bascom Avenue Cal io'oell, CA 95008 Frank Mills, Senior Building Inspector 70 North First Street Campbell, California 95008 1423 TEL 408. 866 2140 F,,r 409 966 8391 TE D 408. 866,2790 July 15. 1998 Gloria Sciara. Planner 11 City of Campbell 70 North First Street Campbell. CA 95008 Re: New Attendant Assi%VValet Parking Field Dear Gloria: Attached is the information on the new Attendant Assisted'Valet Parking Lot new Mwshalls and Left at Albuquerque. As we discussed, this is on a trial basis and will be adjusted or discontinued if it does not work out. Both Marshalls and Left at Albuquerque are monitoring the effect on their business and will advise on a daily basis. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely./ PruneY Associates LLC' By R'il am Wilson & Associaas Its M aging Agent V' T. Unrttlt property Manager Fscloswe r 1� 1 L L I A M O N S; 0 L I A T E 5 Ms Gloria Sciara July 10, 1998 Community Development City of Campbell 70 N First St Campbell, CA 95008 RE Request for Variance to Perform Repairs After Hours On Deteriorating Asphalt in Parking Area Dear Ms Sciara Please find the following site map with locations and dates for repairs to the asphalt parking lot at the Pruneyard located in Campbell, CA We would like to request a variance to work after-hours on 7/12/98 and 7/19/98 between the hours of 8p m and 3a in These repairs are very much needed to reduce the current safety trip hazard to our customers and patrons in addition to preventing any further deterioration to the parking area Scope of Work: Re -New Cement Works, Inc plcns to remove approximately 24,573 sq ft at 8 location of damaged asphalt to a depth of six (6) inches, scarify existing base, roll and compact to a maximum density Install six (6) inches of new hot mix asphalt to approx 24,573 sq ft roll and compact multiple lifts (layers) This work was previously scheduled during regular hours, however, due to it's impact on daily use of the retail section and foot traffic, we would like to perform this work after-hours We feel that this work will reduce the impact to the retail tenants and pedestrians and cause the least amount of inconvenience Security We have provided extra security and supervision to block off and patrol the area during the enti: a project. We will notify custc--ers and tenants 48hours in advance to assure a smooth project with minimum impact. We sincerely appreciate your assistance with this vz :once and if there are any questions or concerns, please contact me at 408-371-4700 Sincerely, Carlos Santamaria Senior Chief Engineer cc Virginia Unruh Senior Property Manager William Wilson & Associates 1Q99 South Ba— Aernur Sartr 2tx/ Campbell CA 9;IxIs Mrpho r 40A, i:1 1.-gin Fammdr 4011- 1, 1 1911 y CITY ut CAMPBELL July 10, 1998 Carlos Santamaria, Sr. Chief Eng. The Pruneyard FAX: 371-3831 SUBJECT: Off hours work times This letter will authorize you to work out of the standard work hours in the area that you showed me on your area map today for the planned asphalt replacement. Work may begin at 5:00 p.m. on Sunday, July 12, 1998 fol . _phalt removal and continue until 12:00 midnight with new asphalt. All portable lighting systems must face away from the apartments to the north and a sound deadening wall shall he installed on the north edge of this work area. You are to notify manager of the apartment complex to the north before any work begins so the manager will have time to notify the tenants of the late work times. A copy will be faxed to the Campbell Police Department. Very truly yours, Frank B. Cauthom, P.E. Building Of`cial 1-BC:db 'ii \,�r,h Fire ti,ree� 1 amrhell. (.alil��rnin �i x,N,x I i'_i ii i Aux xne .I i„ i �� .i��r „�n rive .,�� ♦i,x xn„ _"�,n I A T E S June 29, 1998 Ms. Gloria Sciara, Manner 11 City of Campbell __ J 70 N. First Street J" 13 0 1998 Campbell, CA 95008-1423 CITY OF CAMPBELL Re: Archaeological Monitoring Closure PLANNING DEPT. Report - Pruneyard Place Dear Ms. Sciara: Attached for Vour files is the Archaeological Monitoring Closure Report prepared by Basin Research Associates. This closure report satisfies condition of approval number 16 "Archaeological Mitigation and Monitoring Program" of the City of Campbell Ordinance No. 1955. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely yours, t�L,, Kheay Loke \ Vice President KL/dl cc: David Wcrd, Pruneyard Associates Joe WaNien, Webcor Builders, Inc. _ WIN RESEARCH June 18. 1998 ASSOCIATES 193E DAVIS STREET SUITE r10 SAN LEMNE) .CA 94r11 VOICE 191011 W.r141 EAX I5I014 W.e447 Mr. Kheay Loke Vice President William Wilson & Associates 2929 Camps Drive, Suite 450 San Mateo, CA 94403 RE: Archaeological Monitoring Clara County, port - California Place City of Campbell,Santa C Dear Mr. Loke, Please let this letter report serve as our Archaeological Monitoring Closure Report for e archaeologicai monitoring conducted during subsurface construction for Pruneyard Place, City of Campbell. Santa Clara County. As you are aware, monitoring of subsurface construction by a professional archaeologist was a required mitigation, measure to address any potential impacts to unknown subsurface archaeological resources. This work was conducted intermittently between n April I to June 3. 1998. No significant prehistoric or historic period cultural materials were observed by the Monitoring Archaeologist. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The irregularly shaped Pruneyard Place project is located east of S. Bascom Avenue along the east side of State Route 17, north of Campbell Avenue, and south of Campisi Way, City of Campbell, Santa Clara County, California (USGS San lose West. Calif. 1980: T 7S, R I%, Section 26) [Figs. 1-21. Los Gatos Creek is to the immediate west of the western project boundary. The project consisted of the removal/demolition of the existing parking lot, excavation for a new drainage system, excavation of footings for a four-story parking structure at the north end of the project and for a six -story office tower at the south end of the project and trenching for ctlmof utilities. anThe office rgis sed J ust east of structures at 1901.Bascom d 1999 BascomAvenue (DavidJPowers and Associa.es 1998y PROJECT BACKGROUND In general, areas bordering on and ncar Los Gatos Creek have been designated as archaeologically sensitive based on a general preference by prehistoric peoples to locate camps and villages near sources of water. Archaeological monitoring was mandated as a mitigation measure tj reduce potential cultural resource impacts to a less than significant level although no recorded archaeological sites are located in or near the project. BASIN RECEARCII ASSOCIAIES 1999 S. BASCOM AVE. S 97-20/UP 97-11 2 OF 7 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLAN. 08/2000 A I PRUNEYARD PLACE c..�..... c." O O lyMul OIIM.. WILLIAY WILSON © Q ® I • ASSOCIATES J3 I wu«w - I I q'. I + I . 11-6 cT - a; 71 ' i I ---- .I� -- o ------' ---- • SECOND F-OOR PLAN�- i N� ! ..O N�F Ni N�I .. Q• ' NT .f•I � �� O O O O ®O be O O O O SECOND FLOOR PLAN I A2.02 i PRUNEYARD PLACE OCNM•• C., R lMu•N OHur WILLIAM WILSON _-._--r+•.• - © ® ,jl k ASSOCIATSS ! i I + j • • I ,I .ar• `%/ �• yr '�— I -- I — •i SI s ---------- - .- � a I — -- --0 I i I I —�•- yip_ 1 _ 7 THIRD k FOURTH -.,IRO b FOURTH F,00k PLAN FLOOR PLANS i AZ 03 r >_ PRUNEYARD PLACE c..r.... C...WILLIAM WI ASSOCIA � N T .... i FIFTH k SIXTH FLOOR PLANS r A2-04 PRUNEVARD PLACE tz= WILLIAM WILSON A ASSOCIAT&S ED + II L I HOUS, R OR N'� g�,, I PENTHOUSE & ROOF PLANS - )P-%7,;�JS * ROO' p- AN A2 05 2 PRUNEYARD PLACE C..P..... C." ayu.a aluo C..FMII• CA .....n ....v — i e WILLIAM WILSON • ASSOCIATES ,. _a: 11 loom • 'A5T '!LFVA7I0.%_ -�— EAST ELEVATION 1 1 A:) 01 � Wt5 PRUNEYARD PLACE c..�....e C.,p a.Ile..I orn... C..ye.I1• CA WILLIAM WILSON • ASSOCIATIS liornbelger + Vim, Lm . T WEST ELEVATION t A3.02 t. 1999 S. BASCOM AVE. S 97-10/UP 97-11 2 OF 9 CITY OF CAMPBE,.L PLAIN. 1"1, 99 1 2 ARCHAEOLUi ;ICAL MONITORING Archaeological monitoring of the subsurface construction was conducted intermittently by Mr. Stuart A Guedon (M.A.), Monitoring Archaeologist, Basin Research Associates between April 1 and June 3, 1998. The general contractor, Webcor Builders, Inc. and underground subcontractor MJB Pipeline excavated the drainage system between April 1-10; removed the existing parking lot between April 21-May 5; excavated the parking structure footings May 5-19; and, excavated for the office tower between May 21-June 3. No significant cultural materials were exposed during construction. CLOSINC REMARKS Monitoring records and various project maps are on file at our office for inspection at your convenience. A :opy of this report should be forwarded to the City of Campbell to indicate compliance will, and closure of the archaeological monitoring requirement for the project. Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or need further information. Thank you for retaining BASIN for your project. Sincerely, BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, INC. ��z � IP2� Colin 1. Busby Principal CIB/m REFERENCF_9 CITED David J. Powers and Associates (DJP) 1998 Background Information for the Pruneyard Place Project, City of Campbell, Santa Clara County, California. On tile, Basin Research Associates, San Leandro. United States Department of Interior, Geological Survey (USGS) 1980 San Jose West, Calif. [Quadrangle). Topographic map. 7.5 minute series. United States Geological Sur vey, Menlo Park (1961 photorevised). BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES ATTACHMENTS FIGURES FIGURE I GENERAL PROJECT LOCATION FIGURE 2 PROJECT AREA (USGS San lose West, Calif. 1980) BASIN RESEARCH ASSOCIATES rpure 1: General Protect Location I MEMORANDUM To: Gloria Sciara, Planner 11 From: la emsley. Deputy City Clerk Date: Jcm 24, 1998 Subject: Special Development Permit (SDP 118-01) - The Pruneyard At the regular meeting of June 16, 1998, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 1966 approving a Special Development Permit (SDP 98-01) to allow modification to a previously approved four level parking garage at the Pruneyard located at 1999 S. Bascom Avenue in a C-2-0 ) General Commercial/Overlay) Zoning District. A certified copy of this Ordinance is attached for your records, together with a copy of the letter written to Mr. Word in follow up to the City Council meeting. ,, •T�f}tf. :i y} CITY (tt CAMPBELL Clerk s Ulh, c June 24, 1998 Mr. David Word Pruneyard Associates 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, Ste. 200 Campbell, CA 95008 Dear Mr. Word: At the regular meeting of June 16, 1998, the Citv Council adopted Ordinance No. 1966 approving a Special Development Permit (SI)P 98-01). This Ordinance approves a modificati i! t- , previously approved low level parking garage at the Pruneyard located at 1999 S. Bascom Avenue in a C-2-0 (General ( ununercial/Overlay) Zoning District. A certified copy of Ordinance 1966 is enclosed tier your records. Should you have any questions in regard to the City Council's action, please do not hesitate to contact this office (866-2117) or Gloria Sciara, Community Development Department. Sincerely, Acme Bybee City Clerk Eric. VENOM* Planner 11, Comm. Develop. Dept. 70 North First Street C-Ph.1195008.1413 Rt 408. 866. 7117 - rAM 408 374 618Y 100 408. 866.7790 ORDINANCE NO. i BEING AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL APPROVING A SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (SDP 98-01) TO ALLOW MODIFICATION TO A PREVIOUSLY-APPROVFTI FOUR -LEVEL PARKING GARAGE AT THE PRUNEYARD ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1999 S. BASCOM AVENUE IN A C-2-0 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL/OVERLAY) ZONING DISTRICT. APPLICATION OF MR. DAVID WORD, ON BEHALF OF PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES, LLC. FILE NO. SDP 98-01. After notification and public hearing, as specified by law, and after presentation by the Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed. After due consideration of all evidence presented, the City Council did find as follows with respect to application SUP 98-01: I A Special Development Permit was preciously approved allowing the construction of one 130,000 gross square fool, six -story office building, and a four level parking garage containing 730 parking spaces on the western side of the project site. The proposed development application, as conditioned, is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning designations -which indicate a Commercial land uses for this property. 3. The proposed landscape plan and site amenities will improve the appearance of the proposed project and effectively screen the parking garage. 4. The proposed changes to the parking garage will result in a net gain of 21 parking spaces 5. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was previuusly adopted for Special Development Pertnit 97-01. Based upor, the foregoing findings of fact, the City Council further finds and concludes that: 1. The proposed project, with conditions of apprrval, is consistent with the policies of the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance and is consistent with uses in the immediate area. 2. The proposed project will aid in the enhancement and the harmonious development of the immccliate area. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the use will not he detrimental to the public health, safety, peace, morals, comfort or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood. Cny Council Ordinance SDP 9tt-01 — 1499 S. Bascom Avenue — Prune%ard Garage Page -. The proposed use will not be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the gene -al welfare of the City and its residents. 4. The proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use and site improvements. 5. The conditions of approval as required are related and proportional to the impacts of the project. The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the ordinance of the City of Campbell and the State of California. The lead department with which the applicant will work is identified on each condition where necessary. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is rcauircd to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this development and are not herein specified: I. Protect Approval - Approval is grantel for a Special Development Permit allowing Modification to SDP 98-01 for property located at 1999 S. Bascom Avenue consisting of the following. • Modification to the four level parking garage to delete the sub -grade ramp and parking and the expansion of the fourth floor parking surface and enclosure of the entire fourth floor. Project approval shall substantially comply with project plans prepared by Homberger and Hbrstell. Inc stamp dated Aprii 13, 1998, and exhibits stamp dated May 7, 1998 except as modified by the Conditions of Approval contained herein. 2. Compliance with Ordinance 1955 The applicant shall comply with all conditions of approval adopted with Ordinance 1955 approving Special Development Permit 97-01 in addition to conditions of approval for Special Development Permit 98-01, unless specifically mods ied herein. 3. Modified .Storm Drainage Easement and Legal Description- The applicant shall comply with all requirements and conditions of the City Engineer to address any additional :ncroachment of the garage structure into the existing 20-foot wide City storm drainage easement that lies parallel and immediately adjacent to the westerly property line on the subject property. Encroachment beyond that permitted under Condition of Approval Number 27 of Ordinance No. 1955 and the revised easement description reflecting said encroachment shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and the City Atiorpey. s_l Cite Council Ordinance SDP 98-01 - 1999 S. Bascom Avenue - Prunevard Garage Page 3 4. Review of Lighting Prior to Building Final Occupancy Permit: Prior to signing otTon final occupancy, staff shall review the lighting on the rooftop level to ensure that lighting levels do not adversely impact the neighboring residential uses. PASSED AND ADOPTED this t,:t !day of 199 by the following roll call vole: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: conant, uoughcrt; , wat:;un NOFS: COUNCILM EMBERS: tionu ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: Purtado ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Dean APPROVED: Je ette Watson, Mayor ATTEST: I Anne Bybee, City CTcrk by: Corinne Shinn, Acting Deputy City Clerk . T,us fN= pgPPr GT'`V ETN! M OD.M OM nw ,N TM gvPEE G�fv rAlpA' /1 �. w! A I \ U! A GYP Ell. GKlidW W� a _^q J Pledge of Allegiance The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Ron Pardini, of the Urban Village Farmers' Market. Mayor Watson presented a Certificate of Appreciation to Mr. Pardini for leading the Pled>e of Allegiance. SPECIAL PRESEL7ATIONYS A,'v:D pROCLAhiATIONS There were no Special ?resentatious and Proclamations. COM, -N-ICATIONS AND PETITIONS There were no Communications and Petitions. CONSENT CALENDAR Mayor Watson asked if any Councilmember u, anyone in the audience wished to remove an item from the Consent Calendar. Councilmember Dean announced that he would be abstaining from voting on the portions of the minutes of the June 2, 1998, Council meeting prior to Item 18 on that agenda as well as abstaining from Consent Calendar Item 3 due to a conflict. He removed Item 10, Authorization to Join Amicus Brief: 12d Monte Duties v. City of Monterey for discussion. Councilmember Dougherty removed Items 6, 8 and 9 for discussion. 1. Minutes of Regular Meeting of June 2, 1"8 This action approves the Minutes of ti,e Regular Meeting of June 2, 1998. 2. Payment of Bills and Claims This action approves the list of Bills and Claims for payment covering the period of. May 25, 1998, through June 8, 1998, in the amount of $1,441,018.56. 3. Ordinance 1966 Approving Modification to Previously Approved Special Development Permit (SDP 97-01) allowing modification to approved parking garage at 1999 S. Bascom Avenue in a C-2-0 (General Commercial/Overlay) District - Application of David Word (Second Reading/Roll Call Vote) Ordinance 1966 approves a Special Development Permit (SDP 98-01) allowing modification to approved parking garage at 1999 S. Bascom Avenue. Minutes of 6/16M City Council Meeting WILLIAM WILSON 8 ASSOC ID:408-371--3831 JUN 10'98 13:26 No.004 P.01 TH PRUNEYAR-4:) IV 11.1.1 AN-1 IV ILSON & ASSOC IATIS WILLIAM WILSON & ASSOCIATES FAX COVER SKEET DATE: Pr lO TO: COMPANY: e�I O��13 i2 o YJ/ FAX NUMBER: _ Ir's / FROM: �✓ _ NO. OF PGS. INCLUDING CO F. PACE: ORIGINAL TO FOLLOW: YES NO COMMENTS: auA<4..Q, IPLAv-s H r 0+ this fncsimilc transmilsiml is mlendel only for the tlsc of the individual or cntih, to which it is nddressed and may contain infomsalion that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure. if the reader of this nw. ace is not the intended recipient, you arc hereby notified that dissemination, distribution a copying or this eommrmiealion is strictly prohibited. iry,ru have re:ciml Ibis mcc<are in mm, please notify us immediateiY by telephmm (collect) and rcnn i. lk original mcssaec by ..,it. Thank vou. If you do not receive all Ilse pages or there is a problem with transmission, please call (408) 371r1700 collect as soon as possible. Our Fax Number is (408) 371-3931. 14!17 Grrlh fWrnm A:r•nnr tC% nilr• MYI �./ Cemldril CA opllr.+ lf/7- A-y • 'R Iph,nrr bens l t: 1 l"i xi 7 WILLIAM WILSON B ASSOC ID:408-371-3831 JUN 10'98 13:27 No.004 P.02 Blue Chalk Cafe Corporation • Left at Albuquerque • Blue Chalk Cafe Fax Transmittal Cover Pao To. --vir, CvmpntyA)ept FaA. 1' Der A Ffnrn; 21A R na Tel: Out Fax: (630)473.6635 Number of page' including this one: a xi for all your help in having Left at Albuquerque's front pukingl area roped to opening. Ibis his not completely wived 0w hmch liciiOdliliking since many cars am now parking in the non -roped oat' area for tht day, but it also vmtcd the site on 619 and saw that seamy war chalking vehicles a promised - his is a paitive stop and it is without question that ticketinngg and rowing ides that iolue the 3 hour parking policy is enticsl in solving our existing prop rnf,rruoataly, we cutrundy still have a terrible puking problem after 5 on busier ightsand request that the following measures be taken hmmediately to viase thus mliki 1. Vint, 3 hour parking must be enforced cep to MI. Thus will nt other rtmeyani restaurant employees from pasting in front of Left at Albuq as they o now. Second. a fro' valet stand needs to be set cep in the parking area front of .eft at Albuquerque and Marshall's. This would be similar to eta valab ate wniody operadnj in front of Rock Bosom and EI Burro. per yyour 1 have ockwd a site plan showint possible drop off locations. The ekmihation of wine sodson spaces as shown will create a sufficient drop off am and should v;aw the itv'x concern that vehicles will back up onto Bascom Ave. me should you have any Wations. BI— c3wk Cafe Capontim 360 University Ave., Palo Aho, CA 94301 www ,y,W...n�l•rt i 1 S I'll, SAKI IOCAN AACNITFCTS w � i. .a_rA...r. ":.•tl:am'"3`L"j" j ..r-.u�._..,�_�. PRUNE YARD NG EllE6 •ENANT PUNNY� I ' . :: : ".'!►tom:+.. ;7 i s L ..r 40 •.� . -lick — o ��lIIIIL.. • i • 2 CAMPBELL AVENUE All £0'd 000'ON 8Z:£I 86.0I Nni I48£-I1£-80V;OI ]OSSU 9 NOS11M WbIIII@ 1 OV' C A,, � p•A 1 CITY OF CAMPBELL City Clerk's Office June 3, 1998 Mr. David Word Pruneyard Associates 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, #200 Campbell, CA 95008 Dear Mr. Word: At the regular meeting of June 2, 1998, the City Council held a public hearing to consider your application, on behalf of William Wilson & Associates, LLC, for approval of a Special Development Permit (SDP 98-01) to allow modification to a previously approved four level parking garage at the Pruneyard located at 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, in a C-2-0 (General Commercial/Overlay) Zoning District. After due consideration and discussion, the City Council introduced Ordinance No. 1966 approving the Special Development Permit. This Ordinance will receive second reading at the regular City Council meeting of June 16. 1998. A certified copy of the Ordinance will be. forwarded to you at that time. Please do not hesitate to contact this office (866-2117) or Gloria Sciara, Planner ❑, Community Development Department, should you have any questions in regard to the City Council's action. Siricerely, 112 =�Y~- Arme Bybee City Clerk 'I-C. Gloria Sciara, Planner 11 70 North F-, Street c.m�hen, C.I,6 o -saIN 1423 0i 409. Rr6 2117 I�t SUN 97. 6999 tIN110N 966 ]790 12. Acceptance of Improvements at Morgan Park (Resolution/Roll Call Vote) Resolution 9387 accepts improvements for the Morgan Park Improvement Project, Phase I (Project 97-19), and directs the filing of a Notice of Substantial Completion and eventual filing of a Notice of Completion. 13. Acceptance cf Laprovements - Tract 8726 (Peachtree Estates) and Direct the Filing of the Notice of Satisfaction (Resolution/Roll Call Vote) Resolution 9388 accepts the improvements constructed by Tract 8726 (Peachtree Estates) and directs the filing of the Notice of Satisfaction. 14. Addendum to Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District Fire Services Agreement (Resolution/Roll Call Vote) Resolution 9389 authorizes the City Manager to execute a three-month addendum to the Fire Protection Services Contract with the Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District. M/S: Conant/Furtado - that the City Council approve the Consent Calendar with the exceptit n of Item 11. Motion adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilm-mbers: Conant, Furtado, Dougherty, Watson NOES: Councilmembers: None Mayor Watson deferred consideration of Item I until Councilmember Dean arrives. QKAL REQUESTS Zoltan Szucs, 1270i Saratoga Avenue, Campbell, appeared before the City Council and requested acquisition of the former Campbell Fire Department Rescue 25 truck for restoration purposes. Mayor Watson referred this request to staff. PUBLIC ARINQ AND INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES 15. Application of David Word for Approval of a Modificadon (M 98-04) of a previously approved Spr Jai Development Permit (SDP 97-01) to allow modiBeadon to the approved parking garage at the Pruneyard located at It'd'!. 111+r011tu Avenue in a C-2-0 (General Commercial/Overlay) Zoning District (Introduction of Ordinance/Roll Call Vote) OF eiiiva City Council Meeting This is the time and place for a public hearing to consider the application of David Word for Approval of a Modification (M 98-04) of a previously approved Special Development Permit (SDP 97-01) to allow modification to the approved parking garage at the Pruneya:d located at 1999 S. Bascom Avenue in a C-2-0 (General Commercial/Overlay) Zoning District. Planner 11 Sciara - Staff Report dated June 2, 1998. Mayor Watson declared the public hearing open and asked if anyone in the and:ence wished to be heard. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Watson closed the public hearing M/S: Furtado/Dougherty - that the City Council introduce Ordinance 1966 approving a Special Development Permit (SDP 98-01) to allow modification to a previously approved four -level parking garage at the Pruneyard on property located at 1999 S. Bascom Avenue in a C-2-0 (General CommercialiGverlay) Zoning District, for first reading. Motion adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES Councilmembers: Conant, Furtado, Do, -ahem;., Watson NOES Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: Dean The City Clerk read the title of Ordinance 1Q66. M/S: Furtado/Dougherty - that further reading of Ordinance 1966 be waived. Motion adopted unanimously. 16 Lighting and Landscaping Assessment District - Fiscal Year 1998-99 - Public Meeting This is the time and place for a public meeting regarding the Lighting and Landscaping Assessment District for Fiscal Year 195,9-99. Mayor Watson opened the public meeting and asked if anyone in the audience wished to comment on the levy of assessments for the Lighting and Landscaping Asse<_smen; District for Fiscal Year 1998-99. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Watson closed the public hearing. CONVENE JOINT MEETING OF CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY *Denotes Joint Item Minutes of 6" City Counch Meeting 5 Planning Commission Minutes of May 12, 1998 Page 8 Chairman Lowe read Agenda Item No. 5 into the record. 5. M 98-04 Public Hearing to consider the application of Mr. David Word (SDP97-01) for approval of a Modification (M 98-04) of a previously Word, D. approved Special Development Permit (SDP 97-01) to allow modification to the approved parking garage at the Pruneyard located at 19" S. Bascom Avegae in a C-2-0 (General Commercial/Overlay) Zoning District. A Negativ: Declaration was previously approved for this project. Tentative City Council Meeting Date: June 2, 1998. Ms. Gloria Sciara, Planner 11, presented the staff report as follows: • Advised that the applicants are seeking a Modification to the Special Development Permit which allowed the construction of a 130,000 square foo! office structure and a 730 parking garage. • The current request is to eliminate the plans for a sub -grade ramp and 50 spaces and the addition to the fourth floor of the parking structure with the addition of 71 spaces. The net gain would be 21 spaces. • This addition to the building will eliminate the step effect and create one wall line. • While there will be additional massing, this is mitigated through the use of extensive landscaping. The landscaping is a layered concept including trellis and climbing vines. Trees to be used include poplar, cypress and olive with a range in heights from 25 to 100 feet. The garage will be 33 fen high. • SARC reviewed and had concerns regarding the lighting. • Lighting will include three types of fixtures to provide perimeter, interior and exterior lighting. • The upper floor has been designed to cause a minimum of reflection on neighboring properties. • The light poles are 14 feet high with 64-foot dispersion which illuminates two parking rows. • The building has been designed so that the wall height is sufficiently high that the visibility of car headlights by neighboring properties will be eliminated. • The project is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning with rauncil's approval. • Staff is supportive of this Modification. Chairman Lowe asked about tree planting along Highway 17. Ms. Gloria Sciara answered that the applicants are working with CalTrans. Planning Commission Minutes of May 12, 1998 Page 9 :sioner Icnes presented the Site and Architectural Review report as follows dC met on April 28, 1998, to review this project and found that the information available was insufficient to make a recommendation. • The major concern was the impact of the lighting of this garage on neighboring apartment and the visual impact of this structure from the Pruneyard. Commissioner Gibbons advised that the issues have been responded to within he packet. '-in Lowe opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 5. .,It. David Word, Applicant, 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 2, Campbell: • Advised that they are concerned with three points: Quality, Quantity and Time. • While they are eliminating 50 below grade spaces which required mechanical ventilation they are replacing therm with 70 spaces above grade with fresh air and more light. • Explained that this change is more expensive but represents a faster job. Advised that they can save one month in construction time by making this change. • Explained that they need to have the garage completed for the holiday .hopping saason xnd their goal is completion on the Wednesday prior to Thanksgiving. Also mentioned that if they are allowed to open the garage before the elevator is finished, it could be ready by the beginning of November. Said that since covered parking is provided nearby for handicapped visitors, the City should consider allowing him to w n the garage before the elevator is completed. People can use stairs for the short term. • Advised that they continue to have meetings with a tenant parking committee. Said that he has informed this committee of this plan and invited them to attend this evening if they had any concerns and/or objections. They expressed support and sent no one to sneak out against this proposed modification to the garage. • Advised that his architect is available for questions. Commissioner Gibbons: • Advised that she appreciates the materials provided. • Expressed regret that no community members are present. • Said that she continues to have concemt -bout the rooftop lighting and the height of the proposed light fixtures. • Opined that there needs to be a consistency of light level that is not depicted. Mr. Ron McLester, Project Architect: • Informed that the lighting plan was developed by a lighting consultant who prepared the diagram provided. • Stated that they have actually added lights. • Said that the 14 foot light is a good height for their reeds and allows broad dispersion without the need for too many fixtures Planning Commission Minutes of May 12, 1998 Page 10 Commissioner Gibbons: • Stated that there is too much light in some places, while not enough in others. • Said that the light should be spread out uniformly. Mr. Ron McLester advised that the exhibit probably does not accurately depict the light levels. Commissioner Jones asked if the apartment residents have been notified of this evening's meeting. Ms. Gloria Sciara advised that the property owner was notified and was asked to provide the notice to their tenants. Commissioner Francios stated that the fact the people are not present seems to indicate that there is not much concern. Said that the lighting seems to have been we!I addressed with reflector shielding light from neighbors. Said that staff has handled this issue. Mr. Ron McLester added that the lighting being used was designed for parking lot use. Commissioner Kearns asked what would occur if there are corrplaims once this garage and its lighting is installed. Ms. Gloria Sciara answered that there is a provision that if any property causes a nuisance to another, it can he abated. This is done routinely. Commissioner Jones asked if this matter would go on to Council. Ms. Gloria Sciara replied that it would because it is a Modification to a Special Development Permit within an Overlay District which requires Council authorizaticn. It will likely go before Council on June 2. Chairman Lowe closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. S. Commissioner Gibbons stated that she felt strongly about the appearance of the garage. Suggested that a condition be added so that lighting levels on the roof can he reviewed by staff before signing off on the final occupancy. Mr. Steve Piasecki advised that this condition would pose no problems. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Meyer -Kennedy, seconded by Commi+sioner Francois, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 3167 recommendhsf approval of a Modlficetfon (M 98-04) to a previously - approved Special Development Permit (SLOP 97-01) to ellow modification to the approved parking garage at the Pruneyard on property lowed at 19" S. Planning Commission Minutes of May 12, 1998 Page 11 Bascom Avenue, with the added condition that staff review and approve the rooftop lighting prior to building final, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Francois, Gibbons, Jones, Kearns, Lowe, Meyer -Kennedy NOES: None ABSENT: Lindstrom ABSTAIN: None fff REPORT OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR The written report of Mr. Steve Piasecki, Community Development Director, was accepted as presented with the following additions: • Advised that the San lose City Council selected an alignment for the Vasona Corridor Light Rail through downtown San Jose. • Reminded the Commission of the May 21, 1998, Study Session with Council regarding the Szi Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan and General Plan Updates. The time for this meeting will be from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. • Congratulated the Commission on the successful completion of the Telecommunications Ordinance for which Council took first reading at its last meeting. SpJOURNMENT The Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 8:35 p.m. to the Planning Commission meeting of May 26, 1998, in the Council Chambers, City Ha!I, 70 North First Street, Campbell, California. SUBMITTED BY Corinne A. Shinn, Recording Secretary APPROVED BY: Dennis Lowe, Chair ATTEST: Steve Piasecki, Secretary RESOLUTION NO. 3167 t BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A MODIFICATION OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW MODIFICATION TO THE APPROVED PARKING GARAGE AT THE PRUNEYARD ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 19" S. BASCOM AVENUE IN A C-2-0 (GENERAL COMMERCIAIJOVERLAY) ZONING DISTRICT. APPLICATION MR. DAVID WORD. FILE NO. M 98-04 (SDP 97 01). After notification and public hearing, as specified by :aw, and after presentation by the Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed. After due consideration of all evidence presented, the Planning Commission did find as follows with respect to application M 98-04 (SDP 97-01): I. A Special Development Permit was previously approved allowing the construction of one 130,000 gross square foot, six -story o�:tce building, and a four level parking garage containing 730 parking spaces on the western side of the project site. 2. The proposed development application, as conditioned, is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning designations which indicate a Commercial land uses for this property. 3. The proposed landscape plan and site amenities will 'improve the appearance of the proposed project and effectively screen the parking garage. 4. The proposed changes to the parking garage will result in a net gain of 21 parking spaces 5. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was previously adopted for Special Development Permit 97-01. Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further finds and concludes that: The proposed project, with conditions of approval, is consistent with the policies of the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance and is consistent with uses in the immediate area. 2. The proposed project will aid in the enhancement and the harmonious development of the immediate area. The establishment, maintenancz-, or operation of the use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, peace, morals, comfort or general welfare of persons residing or •�,orking in the neighborhood. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3167 M 98-C4 (SPD 97-01) - 1999 S. Bascom Avenue - Pruneyard Garage Page 2 3. The proposed use will not be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the City and its residents. 4. The proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use and site improvements. The conditions of approval as required are related and proportional to the impacts of the project. The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the ordinance of the City o; Campbell and the State of California. The lead department with which the applicant will work is identified on each condition where necessary. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of Califomia that pertain to this development and are not herein specified: I. Lrsject Approval - Approval is granted for a Special Development Permit allowing Modification to SDP 97-01 for property located at 1999 S. Bascom Avenue consisting of the following: • Modification to the four level parking garage to delete the sub -grade ramp and parking and the expansion of the fourth floor parking surface and enclosure of the entire fourth floor; Project approval shall substantialh comply with project plans prepared by Homberger and Worstell, Inc. stamp dated April 13, 1998, and zxhibits stamp dated May 7, 1998 except as modified by the Conditions of Approval contained herein. 2. Compliance with Ordinance 1955: The applicant shall comply widr all conditions of approval adopted with Ordinance 1955 approving Special Development Permit 97-01 in addition to conditions of approval for M 98-04, unless specifically modified herein. Moo ii[red Storm Drainage Easement and Legal Description: The applicant shall comply with all requirements and conditions of the City Engineer to address any additicnal encroachment of the garage structure into the existing 20-foot wide City storm drainage easement that lies parallel and immediately adjacent to the westerly property line on the subject property. Encroachment beyond that permitted under Condition of Approval Numher 27 of Ordinance Nu 1955 and the revised easement desr.iption reflecting said encroachment shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and the City Attorney. F Planning Commis_.: n Resolution No. 3167 M 98-04 (SPD 97-01) - 1999 S. Bascom Avenue - Pruaeyard Garage Page 3 4. Review of Lighting Prior to Building Final Oecunancv Permit: Prior to signing off on final occupancy, staff shall review the lighting on the rooftop level to ensure that lighting levels do not adversely impact the neighboring residential uses. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12' day of May, 1998, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Francois, Gibbons, Jones, Kearns, Lowe, Meyer -Kennedy NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Lindstrom ABSTAIN: Commissioners: None APPROVED: % Dennis Lowe, Chair ATTEST Steve Piasecki. Secretary 4 of C" y u a MnR ANDU`" Cr1Y OF CAMOF11, PUBLIC WORKS QLE69R M TO: Frank Cauthorr. DATE: April 16, 1998 Building Official FROM: Robert Ko� �!� Public works Director SUBJECT: Pruneyard Building Permits The Agreement for Issuance of Permits between The Pruneyard and the City has been signed by David Word and the second reading of Ordinance 1955 will occur on Tuesday, April 21. If and when The Pruneyard fulfills all the requirements for building permits, it would be appropriate to issue them. Cc: Bernie Stropy, City Manage Steve Piasecki, Community Development Director Bill Helms, Environmental Program Manager h\land&v\pr yd\pernuman(Mp) J M/S: Conant/Dougherty - that further reading of Ordinance No. 1%1 be waived. Motion adopted by a 3-0-1-1 vote, Mayor Watson absent and Councilmember Dean abstained. !I. Approval of Temporary Parking Plan in Conjunction with Special Development Permit 97-01 for the Pruneyard - 1999 S. Bascom Avenue - Application of Mr. David Word on behalf of Pruneyard Associates, LLC This is the time and place for a public hearing to consider approval of a temporary parking plan in conjunction with Special Development Perr..it 97-01 for the Pruneyard - 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, application of David Word on behalf of Pruneyard Associates, LLC. Planner 11 Sciara - Staff Report dated April 7, 1998. Vice Mayor Furtado declared the public hearing open and asked if anyone in the audience wished to be heard. Ted Chavez, 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, Campbell, appeared before the City Council and spoke regarding the temporary parking plan and expressed concerns that the retail parking has not been adequately addressed. Mr. Chavez also prese;a:d a letter on behalf of Nick Siersema, who was unable to attend the Council meeting, which expressed his concerns regarding the retail parking as well. Ross Kay, 360 University Avenue, Palo Alto, representing Lcft At Albuquerque, appeared before the City Council and spoke in support of the temporary parking plan. Jack Bonno, 200 Willow Hill Court, Los Gatos, appeared before the City Council and spoke in support of the parking plan. David Word, William Wilson Associates, appeared before the City Council and spoke in support of the parking plan. There being no one else wishing to speak. Vice Mayor Furtado closed the public hearing Following discussion, M/S: Conant/Dougherty - that the City Council approve the construction period parking plan required for Special Development Permit 97-01, including the Additions outlined in a letter from William Wilson dt Associates dated and received on April 7, 19". Motion adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES Councilmembers: Conant, Dougherty, Furtado NOES Councilmembers: None Minutes of 417196 City Council Meeting ABSENT : Councilmembers: Watson ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: Dean Councilmember Dean returned to the Council Chamber Recess/Reconvene: Vice Mayor Furtado declared a five minute recess. The City Council reconvened at 8:55 p.m 18. Follow Up Report re: Local Improvement District (LID) Surplus Funds (Resolution/Roll Call Vote) Accounting Manager Takahashi - Staff Report dated April 7, 1998. Following discussion, M/S: Conant/Dean - to adopt Resolution 9358 declaring as surplus the balances remaining in LID Nos. 2, 4, 8, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 19, 21, 23, 27, 28, 29 and 30; close the related construction and debt service funds, and transfer the remaining surplus monies into a General Fund designation for future maintenance of the respective improvements except for LID 30; utilize surplus money in LID 27 for maintenance of the improvements, consistent with a previous Council Resolution 5994; utilize surplus money in LID 28 for maintenance of the improvements, specifically for the reconstruction of Campisi Way; utilize surplus money in LID 30 to call outstanding bonds thereby reducing future assessments for current parcel owners; and transfer to the General Fund a maximum of $1,000 from each LID to offset the City's costs to administer these LIDS. DISCUSSION OF THE MOTION: Councilmember Dougherty stated that he would support the staff recommendation with a condition that the current parcel owners be notified by letter of the City's intention to use the surplus funds for maintenance within each District. VOTE ON THE MOTION: Councilmembers Conant and Dean amended their motion/second to include direction to staff to notify the current parcel owners of the City's intention to use the surplus funds for rnainte. ante within each District. Motion adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES Councilmembers: Conant, Dougherty, Dean, Purtado NOES Councilmembers: None LMinutts or 1/7/911 City Council Mating g WILLIAM W I L S O N & ASSOCIATES April 7, 1998 DECEIVED Ms. Gloria Sciara ? 0 7 1998 Planner II CITY OF CAMPBELL City of Campbell PLANNING DEPT. 70 North First Street Campbell, CA 95008-1423 Re: Additions to the PntneYard Construction Period Parking Plaa Dear Gloria: As a result of further input from our tenants in regard to the Construction Period Parking Plan we will be adding the following to the Plan: Skunk Service Hours The off site shuttle service hours will be expanded by one hour in the morning to accommodate more employees. The service had been scheduled to begin at 7:00 a.m. but will now begin at 6:00 a.m. Disabled Parkins: Tower 1 - Three (3) handicapped spaces to be provided in the back corner of Lot 8, immediately adjacent to the main entrance to Tower I. Tower 11 - One (1) space will remain on the back side of the Tower 11 tier, Bank of The West. Two (2) additional handicapped spaces will he located in the back corner of Lot 8, again immediately adjacent to the main entrance to 'Tower IL Temporary ramps may hare to be built from thew locations to provide accessibility to the buildings iv the event the curtent access ramps will be contained within the construction area. If approved, these changes will be incorporated into the final Construction Period Parking Plan Sincerely, pnur,Ygd Associates LLC a �,'��uw �T. Ur r CPM Manager 1999 smh 8astmn r"N' suite 200 CampW11 CA 45008 Te **— 4081 '71-4700 FK m lr 1408) 171 3811 city Item No: + - • ��✓✓ Category: Public Hearing Council Meeting Date: April 7, 1998 Report � Approval of Temporary Parking Plan in conjunction with Special Development Permit 97-01 for the Pruneyard -- 1999 S. Bascom Ave. — Application by Mr. David Word on behalf of Pruneyard Associates, LLC. -- SDP 97-01 RECOMMENDATION That the City Council take the following action: APPROVE the construction period parking plan required for Special Development Permit 97-01. BACKGROUND Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is requesting approval of a construction period parking plan associated with Special Development Permit 97-01. Proiect Backere�; (M January 6, 1998 the City Council adopted On finance Number 1955 approving Special Development Permit 97-01 and a Site and Architwurai Approval 91-20 allowing the construction of ❑ 130,000 gross square foot, six -story office building, and a four level parking garage on the western portion of the Pruneyard property. Condition of Approval Number 15 of the Special Development Permit requires the developer to prcpar- a temporary parking plan for parking spares that would be displaced during the construction period. The parking plan is subject to approval by the City Council prior to the issuance of building permits. L Do pWmand: The number of parking spaces provided in the temporary puking plan was based on estimates for parking demands at the Pruneyard. Estimates used for the plan include a 95% demand of the existing parking spaces in the office area (739 spaces) and a demand of 65% of the parking spaces for the hotel area (106 spaces). A total of 844 parking spaces currently exist in these two areas. Based on the above demand ratios for the hotel and office parking, a total of 770 puking spaces are required to meet the parking demand of both uses daring construction. After the construction fields are established 398 puking spaces will remain available. This leaves a deficit of 372 parking space that must be replaced during construction. The parking plan proposes to replace this parking in two ways: On -site puking through the use of "stacked" pulsing concept in designated areas 2. Off -site parking spaces accessed via a shuttle service. Parkins Plan: The construction puking plan reflects input from tbs retail and office tenants who attended several meetings with the Pruneyard management company. The goal of the temporary parking plan was to mitigate all of the displaced parking resulting from construction, and to minimize inconvenience to tenants and visitors of the Prineyard. The four main components of the parking plan consist of the following: City Council Report — April 7, 1998 Temporary Parking P:an (SDP 97-01/S 97-20) — 1999 S. Bascom Avenue Page -2- Attendant-Assist6tack Parking: This arrangement consists of utilizing the existing parking spaces in the Pruneyard office complex area on a first come/serve basis, then once these parking stalls are filled, cars would be parked perpendicular behind the cars in the parking stalls. A maximum of one car would be stacked per parking aisle. Persons parking in the stacking areas would turn their keys over to a parking attendant and receive a claim check. Stacked parkins is limiteu to the office and hotel lots Qots 7,8,9, and 10) as indicated on the site plan attached in the parking plan. Stacked parking will primarily be used for tenants staying an extended period only. Therefore, movement of vehicles and waiting times to retrieves vehicles is limited. One to three attendants would be stationed at each parking area with peak hours having more attendants. The time estimated to retrieve a vehicle is five minutes. Staffing of the stacked areas will be provided from: • 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday through Wednesday • 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. Thursdays and Fridays • 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. Saturdays A total of 220 vehicles can be stacked on -site. Combined with the 398 remaining parking spaces at the office and hotel lots, a total of 618 parking spaceR can be accommodated on -site. The balance of 152 parking spaces (of the 770 parking space demand) must be provided off -site. Off -site Shurt/e Service: A total of 160 parking spaces will he provided at the Campbell Community Center for off -site parking. Parking at the Community Center will be available Monday through Friday between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. The Ccmmunity Center parking will be utilized by 100 Compuware employees and 60 other designated employees of the Pruneyard. Employees will park directly at the Community Center and take a shuttle bus to the Pruneyard. The shuttle will run every 10 minutes during pea': periods and every 15 minutes during off-peak periods. Vehicles remaining at 5:55 p.m. will bt moved to the Pruneyard by the parking employees. The applicant is required to enter into a lease agreement for the use of the Community Center parking spaces. Valet Parking: Traditional valet parking service will be offered for both the retail and office patrons. Valet parking is a complimentary service for patrons. Signage will be provided indicating the valet service areas. Thn locations and service hours of the valet service are: Location Hours Staffed • Visitor lot between the office buildings 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Monday • Friday • Parking Area south of Marshall's 5:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. Thursday - Saturday • In front of Mrs. Field's Cookies 5:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. Thursday - Saturday Alternative Transz,ortarion: A mid -day transportation fair by Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) has been scheduled at the Pruneyard on April 2, 1998. The fair will provide information on services provided, including carpooling, vanpooling programs and Commuter Check, a lJ program whereby employer pays for transit fares. The parking plan indicates that the Pruneyard management will participate in employee reimbursement and offer incentives for carpools including preferential parking. City Council Report — April 1998 Temporary Parking Plan (SDP 97-01/S 97-20) — 1999 S. Bascom Avenue Page -3- Construction Parkins: A limited number of construction foremen will park within the fenced construction area. All other construction workers will park on the Maxim property on the west side of Creekside Way. Workers will walk from the parking lot to the Pruneyard. The general contractor will monitor construction worker parking for compliance. Time Frame: The future parking garage will provide 739 packing spaces. Project scheduling indicates that the parking garage will take approximately eight months to complete. At the completion of the parking garage, the parking spares displaced by the construction field will be off -set by the availability of the parking garage. Therefore, the temporary parking plan will only be required until the parking garage is available. Staff Recommendations: The temporary parking plan was evaluated by Community Development and Public Works?raffic Engineering staff. Overall, staff finds that the parking plan is comprehensive and adequate to meet all of the parking demand for the Pruneyard during construction. Staff is recommending that the applicant follow-up with staff on the following issues: I. Continue to evaluate changes in parking and street layouts that could safely expand on -site parking on a short term and long term basis. 2. Monitor the temporary parking plan and provide periodic status repons to city staff that documents adequacy of the shuttle service during peak periods of demand, parking availabiliq and waiting times for valet service, and impacts on retail parking. 3. Provide security for bicycles used by tenants for transportation. 4. Designate the vanpool and carpool parking spaces on the parking plan map. ALTERNATIVES 1. Deny Approval of the Temporary Parking Plan 2. Modify the Temporary Parking Plan with additional conditions of approval as deemed necessary. 3. Continue consideration of the plan for further review. Attachments: 1. Ordinance 1955 2. Construction Parking Plan Prepared by: Reviewed by:: Development Director Approved by: Bem rd M. Sty ny, ity Manager TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW 1 ASSESSMENT OF PARKING DEMAND 2 Parking Space Availability Analysis 3 ATTENDANT-ASSISTISTACK PARKING 4 A. Service Concept 4 B. Areas of Service 4 C. Staffing/Hours of Operation 4 D. Communications 5 E. Patron Wading Times 5 F. Disabled Parking 5 G. Movement of Vehicles 5 H. After -Hours Access 5 I. Security C J. Responsibility of Vehicles 8 K. Signage 7 L. Special Events 7 M. Back-up Plans 7 VALET PARKING 8 A. Service Concept 8 B. Areas of Service 8 C. Staffing/Hours of Operation 9 D. Communications 9 E. Patron Waiting Times 9 F. Visitor Parking/Short-Term Parking 9 G. After -Hours Access 1u H. Security 10 I. Responsibility of Vehicles 10 IV. ADDITIONAL ON -SITE PARKING 11 V. OFFSITE SHUTTLE SERVICE 11 A. Service Concept 11 B. Areas of Service 11 G. Staffing/Hours of Operation 12 D. Communications 12 E. Patron Waiting Times 12 F. Security 13 G. Incentives 13 VI. ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION 14 VII. TRANSPORTATION FAIR 15 VIII. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR PARKING 15 IX. IMPLEMENTATION 15 X. COMPLIANCE 16 XI. PARKING COMPLAINT PROCESS 16 EXHIBIT A. SIGNAGE EXHIBIT B. SITE PLAN EXHIBIT C. COMPLAINT FORM PruneYard ;onstruction Period - Parking Plan Vervie The PruneYard is constructing a new 120,000 square foot office tower and a 738 space garage on the west side of the complex. The erection of the new buildings will result in the temporary loss of 427 parking spaces during the initial 8 months of the construction period. At that time, the new garage will be ready for occupancy, which will completely eliminate the anticipated parking shortfall. This plan has been developed to clearly define the steps which the PruneYard will take to mitigate this loss of parking space during construction, to minimize the inconvenience to all tenants of the project (both officz and retail) as well as their visitors. The plan is comprised of four main components, as follows, 1. Attendant-Assist/Stack Parking 2. Valet Parking 3. Off -Site Shuttle Service 4. Alternative Transportation The foregoing items, when employed as part of an integrated parking management plan, will provide the PruneYard with a workable strategy to meet the parking needs of its tenants and visitors during this interim period of growth. The following pages provide details on the overall scope of the project and each of the plan's components. This plan is intended to be dynamic, and includes built-in flexibility to after its nature in order to meet the changing parking needs of the PruneYard. All costs associated with the implementation of this parking plan shall be bome by the project owner as a development cost. There shall not be pass -through costs to PruneYard tenants resulting from the execution of this plan. We look forward to reviewing this plan with the PruneYard Parking Task Force and are open to discuss and/or alter any portions of the plan as necessary, in the pursuit of developing "a really good parking plan!" Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 1 PruneYard Construction Period - Parking Plan Assessment of Parking Demand In order to develop a plan which meets the needs of the project during the construction period, it is necessary to start with a reasonable estimate of the parking demand which can be expected to be experienced. Informal surveys were conducted in March 1997 by the William Wilson & Associates (WW&A) staff. The results of these surveys pointed to the reed to obtain a professional analysis of the site. The traffic engineering firm of Linscott, Law and Greenspan was then hired by WWSA to provide hourly occupancy surveys of the entire project. The work was completed in July, 1997 and indicated a peak demand in the office parking areas of approximately 76% of total available spaces. We noted in our review of this study that July (in fact the entire late May -early September summer period) generally has the lowest associated parking demand, and that these figures should be increased to take into account the higher demand levels associated with early spring and fail. Note. November and December generally represent the highest parking remand, with a yfsdual drop-off through spring and into summer. Current observations of the lots made during the first 2 weeks of January 1998 by Ampco personnel during the peak office demand periods It 00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. and 2:00 - 3.00 p.m.) consistently showed occupancy in the 78%-80% range To err on the side of conservatism, we used a 95% demand figure to base all recommendations provided in this plan. The exception to this is the hotel lot which experiences significantly lower demand. We have used a 65% demand figure for this lot. The charts on the next two pages provide complete -, •ils on the number of spaces available currently as well as during construction, and designate the number of additional cars which can b= "stacked" in each of the available parking areas to meet this demand. The figures clearly show that a combination of attendant -assisted parking along with an off -site shuttle service will be required to meet the project's parking needs during the construction period. Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 2 PruneYard Construction Period - Parking Plan The PruneYard - Parking Space Availability Analysis Parking Lot (;&PaClRS---r—Ur-r*-nTT=T- Demando a Lot s s Spaces Factor Demand m 258 Panung LOt Capacities - During Construction Plus Stack T-OU-r— Lot • Jt Spaces Spaces X SSpaces — — To-5 1 398— otal ParKing Demand - Current Total Puking Available Dunug Const 61b C. Parking Shortage: 5nutue Service Kidership ompuware trriployees UtMer Uffice building mp�oy Total u e Service Mare E. IParking Surplus Based onDemand: Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 3 PruneYard Construction Period - Parkin Plan II. Attendant-AssisUStack Parking A. Service Concept The two terms, "attendant -assist" and "stack parking" are used interchangeably to describe a parking operating format where parking attendants are provided within a self -park facility to expand the number of cars which the facility can hold. The key to the concept is to let the parking lots fill naturally, i.e., allow all of the regular self park spaces to fill up as normal. Once full, rather than closing the lots, attendants stationed throughout the lots would direct additional car; to park in the aisles, blocking the other cars in. They would issue claim checks to these parkers in exchange for their keys, and would lock the keys in a nearby keybox. The attendants move cars only as necessary to let blocked vehicles exit. Toward the end of the day, as regular parking spaces become available, the attendants will move aisle cars into these spaces, to make exiting easier for all patrons. 8. Areas of Service The program would be implemented at (3) parking areas serving the existing office buildirgs. We have identified these areas on the attached drawing as lots 7, 9 and 10. Lot 7 is the small parking area that will remain on the northwest side of the project, next to where the new parking garage is being built: Lot 9 is the large lot on the southwest side of the project, behind Tower 1. The lot serving the hotel, designated as Lot 10, will also be used for attendant -assist services. This lot is newly available through an agreement with the hotel for office parking C Staffing/Hours of Operation The overall parking program will be overseen by a full-time on -site manager, who will report directly to WW&A. In this person's absence, another individual will be designated as the project supervisor, to oversee and direct the work of the parking attendants and shuttle drivers The service will be provided from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Wednesday, and from 7:00 a.m to 11:00 p.m. on Thursdays and Fridays. In addition, the program will be offered on Saturdays from 3:U0 p.m, to 11:00 p.m. to accommodate additional retail demand during this period. The chart on the following page details the number of parking attendants which will be assigned to each of the lots during peak operating hours, which for this service is anticipated Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 4 PruneYard Constru::tion Period - Parkin Plan to be between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday - Friday. During earlier and later periods, each lot will normally have one parking attendant assigned to it. Position Lot 7 1 Lot 9 1 Lot 1l) Attendant(s) 1-2 1 2-3 1 1-2 One or more parking attendant stations will be located at convenient locations in each of the lots. The location of each of these proposed attendant stations is shown on the attached site map. D. Communications The Manager, Supervisor and one attendant at each parking lot will each have a 2-way radio to ensure prompt communication between all locations within the program. These radios will be on the same frequency used by VVWBA tc allow interaction with property management and security, as necessary. E Patron Waiting Times Based on the size of the project, the level of staffing provided and our experience at providing similar services to other projects, we estimate a maximum customer wait time of no more than 5 minutes. This time is measured from the time the customer arrives at the location to retrieve their vehicle until the time the customer is in their car, ready to exit the lot. Disabled Parkins As the construction project will remove a large number of the existing handicap - accessible parking spaces currently provided, new spaces will be provided which meet all applicable codes. These spaces will be provided in Lot 9. G. Movement of Vehicles Parking attendants will move vehicles from one space to another within a given parking lot only as rec,-aired to allow other cars to exit. At no time will cars be moved from the lot in which the customer originally parked to another lot within the project. H. Affer-Nyurs Access At the designated closing time each evening, the parking attendants at each lot will move any remaining vehicles with keys to a designated spot near the front of each lot. The cars will be locked and the vehicle's license number along with the ticket number issued to the driver will be entered on a log. The log, along with Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 5 PruneYard Construction Penod - Parking Plan any keys, will be taken to the security desk located in the lobby of 1999 S. Bascom Avenue where it will be signed for by a WWBA security officer. Keys for any vehicles left after the posted closing time must be picked up by the tenant (or visitor) at this location, and they must present their claim ticket as proof that the vehicle is thei.s. The security officer will provide an escort for any patron back to their vehicle, upon request. Note: To minimize inconvenience, the designated lot closing time will be set so as to minimize the possibility of having to transfer keys to the security desk. At most office -oriented projects, 7:00 p.m. has proven to be a convenient time for the vast majority of patrons. Generally, tenants who find themselves working late unexpectedly will come down to the lot prior to closing to claim their keys directly from the attendant on duty, and move the car to a space closer to their office. Secuntv The presence of parking attendants throughout the lots creates what is known as a deterrent effect: criminals do not want to attempt to vandalize cars when there are parking attendants present, as there is a greater likelihood of their being caught, if seen. Attendants who notice anyone hanging around in the lots under their control will be instructed to immediately summon WWBA security officers via 2-way radio. J. Responsibility for Vehicles Ampco System Parking will be fully responsible for the safety and security of every car whose driver has left its keys with one of our parking attendants. Any claimed damage or loss must be pointed out immediately to the attendant on duty, who will call the manager or supervisor on duty via 2-way radio to fill out an Accident/Loss report. Ampco handles all claims directly through its regional claims administrator. Once received, all claims will be handled prompty and professionally. To protect ourselves from false claims, our attendants will be required to perform a quick "walk -around" inspection of every vehicle for which a claim check is issued, to note any previously existing damage. They will mark any damage noted directly on the claim check and also point it out to the driver to eliminate the possibility of misunderstandings on this important issue. This process generally takes about 10 seconds and is a quick and nearly invisible procedure. With respect to contents of the car, we ask that patrons work with us by not leaving items of obvious value in the passenger compartment, but rather, to kick Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 6 PruneYard CyncinurHon Penod - Parkin Plan them in the trunk, out of sight. Our attendants require only a door key and an ignition key to perform their duties. K. Sione Signage will be provided to assist patrons in using the lots during the construction period. These signs will convey basic 'irmation needed to allow the program to function properly. Excessive sig, is more'likely to confuse than inform, and therefore a limited signage program is proposed. As the program is designed primarily to accommodate regular everyday patrons, the signage is intended to reinforce the designated use of certain parking areas and to provide information for after-hours key retrieval. Proposed signs have been provided as an attachment to this package L. Special Events The attendant -assist service can easily be expanded as necessary in order to accommodate the various special event needs of the project. This may include higher than normal demand from events such as; • Sales Meetings • Major Hotel Bookings • Special Screening Movie Events In order to adjust staffing and personnel scheduling to meet these periods of unusual demand, the tenants responsible for the event will need to provide WW&A with a minimum of one week's written notice of the planned event, including (if possible) an estimate of the event's attendance, to provide time for Ampco to ensure proper planning, staffing and supervision is in place for the event. M. Back-up Plans Several back-up plans are available to increase the number of vehicles which can be accommodated in the on -site lots: • "Htoavy" Stacking - the attendant -assist concept relies on what is referred to as a -light stack- approach. As described previously, in this scenario, there is never more than one car blocking in another, making retrieving one's vehicle and exiting relatively simple. In a more urban setting, parking lots are routinely set up for heavy stacking. This generally means cars are parked up to 3 or 4 deep. It certainly has the potential to be less convenient, Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 7 PruneYard Construction Period - Parkino Plan but in these situations, the parking attendants actually park more of the cars so that that they can stack them according to expected departure time. For example, cars exiting at 6:00 p.m. are placed in the back row, and cars with increasingly earlier departures are put in front of them. Finally the very front row is left open for quick in & out parking. This approach works surprisingly well, and is presented here as a possible means to further increase the number of cars which can be accommodated on -site. Polential lots to provide a heavy stack service are Lots 7 and 9. • Use of a Portion of Lot 5 for Stack Parking - A single row of cars could be stacked on the western aisle of Lot 5 for 3 net gain of 17 parkir3 spaces. Ill. Valet Parking A. Lervic& QnO f Traditional valet parking, where patrons are afforded "front door-4pe" parking service will be offered for both office and retail patrons. in this program, cars will enter a designated valet area and proceed to a valet station where they will be greeted by a valet parking attendant. The valet will issue a claim check for their vehicle and the patron will proceed on foot to their destination. The valet will park the car in an available parking space and return to the valet station to assist another patron. Upon return, the patron will present his or her claim check and the valet will retrieve the car and return directly to the patron at the valet station. The valet service is complimentary, and tipping is not required. Signs stating this policy will be posted at every valet station and at the entrance to every valet parking area. B. Areas of Service The program would be implemented at (3) parking areas serving the existing office buildings as well as the retail portion of the project. We have identified these areas on the attached drawing as Lot 8 and Area A and B. Lot 8 4 the existing Visitor lot between the two office towers; Area A is a portion of Lot 1 along the project's center drive; and, Area B is in the small curb cut-out on the northwest drive aisle next to Mrs. Field's Cookies. Lot 8 will be used as the main parking area for this service, and will be used for the valet parking of cars which enter Lot 8 directly as well as all cars using the Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 8 PruneYard Construction Period - Parkin Plan Area B valet station (which ha- no parking of its own). Depending on space availability, excess valet demand from Area A may be taken to Lot 8 as well. C. Staffing/Hours of Operation The service will be provided in Lot 8 from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Valet stations at areas A and B will be operated from 5:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m., Thursday - Saturday. Staffing will be provided as needed to meet experienced demand, but will consist of a minimum of two valet attendants assigned to each valet area during all designated operating hours. A designated valet station will be located a t convenient locations in each of the valet parking areas. The location of each of these valet stations is shown on the attached site map. D. Communications Each valet station will have a 2-way radio to ensure prompt communication between all locations within the overall program. These radios will be on the same frequency used by WWBA to allow interaction with property management and security, as necessary. E. Patron Waiting Times Based on the need for a parking attendant to park and retrieve every vehicle that uses the valet service, we estimate a maximum customer wait time of between 5 and 10 minutes. This time is measured from the time the customers arrives at the location to retrieve their vehicle until the time the valet returns the vehicle to the customer F. Visitor Parkina/Short-Term Parkins In order to accommodate visitors to the project as well as those tenants who expect to park for two hours or less, the existing Visitor Lot between the two office towers will be designated for short term use only, and will be a 100% valet. All visitors and office tenants will be free to use this lot, but the parking valets will be asked to direct those patrons who expect to be longer than 2 hours to park in one of the other designated lots. The two hour parking limit will also be posted with signage. Each patron will be asked to provide his/her estimated departure time, so that the attendants can park their cars according to the departure time indicated to the attendant. Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 9 PruneYard Construction Period - Parkin Plan G. After -Hours Access At the designated closing time each evening, the parking valets at each valet area will move any remaining vehicles with keys to a designated spot near the front of each lot. Cars dropped off by their owners at Lot 8 or Area B will be parked in Lot 8. Cars dropped off at Area A will be parked in Lot 1. The cars will be locked and the vehicle's license number along with the ticket number issued to the driver will be entered on a log. The log, along with any keys, will be taken to the security desk located in the lobby of 1999 S. Bascom Avenue where it will be signed for by a WMA security officer. Keys for any vehicles left after the posted closing time must be picked up by the tenant (or visitor) at this location, and they must present their claim ticket as proof that the vehicle is theirs. The security officer will provide an escort for any patron back to their vehicle, upon request. H. secun The presence of parking valets in the valet parking areas creates what is known as a deterrent effect: criminals do not want to attempt to vandalize cars when a there are parking attendants present, as there is a greater likelihood of their being caught, if seen Valets who notice anyone hanging around in the areas under their control will be instructed to immediately summon WWBA security officers via 2-way radio. 1. Responsibility for Vehicles Ampco System Parking will be fully responsible for the safety and security of every car whose driver has left its keys with one of our parking valets. Any claimed damage or loss must be pointed out immediately to the valet on duty, who will call the manager or supervisor on duty via 2-way radio to fill out an Accident/Loss report. Ampco handles ali claims directly through its regional claims administrator. Once received, all claims will be handled promptly and professionally. To protect ourselves from false claims, our valets will be required to perform a quick "walk-arourid" inspection of every vehicle for which a claim check is issued, to note any previously existing damage. They will mark any damage noted directly on the claim check and also point it out to the driver to eliminate the possibility of misunderstandings on this important issue. This process generally takes about 10 seconds and is a quick and nearly invisible procedure. With respect to contents of the car, we ask that patrons work with us,, by not leaving items of obvious value in the passenger compartment, but rather, to lock Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 10 PruneYard Construction Period - Parking Plan them in the trunk, out of sight. Our attendants require only a door key and an ignition key to perform their duties. IV. Additional On -Site Parking We continue to look for additional on -site parking spaces both temporary and permanent by re -striping or reconfiguring. As an example, there is the possibility of using the loop -road in the vicinity of Tower 2 for a limited number of parallel parking spaces as the fire department will approve. The north driveways are also being studied for additional parking spaces. V. Off -Site Shuttle Service A. Service Concept A shuttle bus service will be provided to transport specified employees of Compuware and otner designated office volunteers to and from the designated off -site parking lot. The service will consist of a sufficient number of busses to provide a fast, efficient service to all patrons. The program is designed to accommodate up to 160 patrons per day, from the following user groups er Gr2MR Com uw re Other Tenants Total 71 # of Patrons 100 60 160 'Retailers have been supportive of the idea of requiring their employees to participate in the off -site parking. but the retail employee shuttle service was not used as part of the parking demand estimate developed as a basis for this plan. We will continue to seek another location for off -site retail employee parking. B. Areas of Service The primary off -site shuttle parking area will be the Campbell Community Center located approximately 1.25 miles from the PruneYard, at the comer of Winchester and Campbell Avenues. The shuttle bus route will be from the PruneYard on Campbell Avenue to the Community Center. Maps and instructions will be provided to shuttle riders in the Shuttle Rider Information Packet as described under Section VII. "Implementation." This site has 160 regular parking spaces. The site will be monitored by security during all hours of operation. Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 11 PruneYard Construction Period - Parking Plan Should an alternative site become available, such as the Breuners site, we may request transferring the location. We will continue to seek another off -site location to expand the service to serve the retail employees. A single designated pick-up/drop-off point would be located in the existing curb cut adjacent to Tower 1. A section of the curb on the roadway adjacent to the office tower would be painted for "Shuttle Bus Loading/Unloading Only", allowing direct access to the office buildings, without having to drive into the parking lots. Quick delivery by Federal Express, UPS, etc. will also be allowed to use this area. Larger deliveries will continue to use the designated area behind Tower 2 and will be accommodated directly in front of Tower 1. One or more shuttle stops will be designated at the off -site parking area. Once the exact location at the Community Center is confirmed, these plans will be finalized. Signs will be posted to clearly identify each of the designated shuttle stops. A sample of the shuttle stop signs is included as at the back of this package. Shuttle vehicles will also be clearly marked to indicate they are part of the PruneYard Shuttle Service. C. Staffing/Hours of Operation As noted previously, the overall parking and shuttle program will be overseen by a full-time on -site manager, who will report directly to WWBA. In this person's absence. another individual will be designated as the project supervisor, to oversee and direct the work of the parking attendants and shuttle drivers. The service will be provided from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. All vehicles will need to be removed from the site by 6:00 p.m. Employees working later may move their vehicles from the off -site location to the PruneYard. D. Communications The Manager, Supervisor and each shuttle bus will have a 2-way radio to ensure prompt communication between all locations within the program. These radios will be on the same frequency used by WWBA to allow interaction with property management and security, as necessary. E. Patron Waiting Times Shuttle bus service will run every .0 minutes during peak periods and every 15 minutes during off-peak periods. The chart on the following page shows the hour of the day, whether it is considered "peak' or "off-peak" and the frequency of service during that time. Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 12 PruneYard Construction Period - Parking Plan Time of Da Peak or Off -Peak Frequency of Service 7:00 a m. - 8:00 a.m. Peak every 10 minutes eve —inutes 8:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. Peak 9:00 a.m. - 10:00 a.m. Off -Peak every 15 minutes 10:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. Off -Peak every 15 minutes 11:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. Peak every 10 minutes 12:00 p.m. - 1:00 p.m. Peak every 10,minutes 1:00 p.m. - 2:00 p.m. Off -Peak every 15 minutes 2:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m. Off -Peak every 15 minutes 3:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. Off -Peak every 15 minutes 4:00 p.m. - 5:00 p m. Peak every 10 minutes 5:00 p m. - 5.45 p.m. Peak every 10 minutes Security A uniformed security officer will be assigned to monitor the off -site lot during all opera,ing hours. This individual will also be available to escort passengers directly to their vehicles. Depending on the exact configuration of the off -site parking area, the shuttle driver may be able to drive passengers directly to their vehicle, during off -peek hours. Shuttle drivers who notice anyone hanging around in the lot will be instructed to immediately summon WMA P-curity officers via 2-way radio. The shuttle parking lot will be lit during of darkness G. Incentives In order to encourage patrons to voluntarily sign up for the off -site shuttle service, a number of incentives will be offered. These incentives may include: • Free car wash certificates • Random "Coffee & Danish" days • Prune Yard "Cash" Certificates • Monthly raffles The foregoing list will be further refined in the coming weeks. The intent of the progra,t is to give us a way to offer continuous "thanks" to our patrons in exchange for the inconvenience they will bear during the construction period. This program would be open to all shuttle riders whether Compuware, offit a or retail employees. Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 13 PruneYard Construction Penod - Parkin Plan Some of the incentives will be available to anyone who rides the shuttle on a particular day, while others, such as the raffles, will be open only to those who ride the shuttle a certain number of days each month. We are developing a "Frequent Rider" program which will consist of a card which is stamped by the driver every time the rider get: on the shuttle in the morning. After a pre -determined number of rides, the card is exchanged for a freebie (to be determined). The card is then entered into the drawing for that month's raffle prize. Prizes being considered include TVs, VCRs, Walkmans, and gift certificates. One of the innovative aspects of the program is the plan to issue gift certificates good only at PruneYard retailers. These will have a dollar amount indicated on them and can be used just like cash a: any PruneYard retailer. The retailers would redeem them each month througt the Management office. This program would not only reward patrons of the shuttle service, but would provide a no cost boost to the center's retailers Participation of the PruneYard s retail merchants is requested to flesh this idea out more uay. VI. Alternative Transportation A. Car Pools - Preferred parking spaces will be provided for members of car pools. These spaces will be toL;eted in designated areas of Lot 9, as close as possible to Tower 1 The Santa Clara County Commuter Matching Service, RIDES, in conjunction with PruneYard Management, will handle commuter matching. Commuter information can be faxed through the PruneYard management office directly to RIDES, or information may be input through the Internet at www rides.org. Information will be available at our upcoming Transportation Fair scheduled for early April. B Commuter Check employees converting from commuting by private vehicle to commuting by dnta Clara County Transit and Vanpools (also Light Rail, Cal Train, Bart or Ferry if used for a partial leg of a commute) will be eligible for participation in the Commuter Cheek program. Under this program William Wilson & Associates issues a commuter check to the participant The participant redeems the check towards the purchase of a ticket for public transportation at the appropriate ticket office. Vanpoolers would redeem the commuter check directly with participating vanpool drivers More information will be available at the Transportation Fair in April. Prepared by Amy co System Parking Page 14 PruneYard Construction Period - Parkino Plan C. Bicycles - Employees converting from commuting by private vehicle to commuting by bicycle will be eligible for incentives equal to the amount of commuter checks for public transportation. Additional bicycle racks will he provided in designated areas of Lot 9, where they can be seen by on -site parking personnel, during normal operating hours. Assistance with bicycle routes will be provided. VII. Transportation Fair Information on all modes of alternative transportation, including those above, telecommuting or walking will be provided at a Transportation Fair to be held in early April at the PruneYard. Representatives from Valley Transit Authority will be on -site with a vast array of information, maps and schedules. Although it is not feasible for VVW&A, the Ecco Pass Program will also be represented at the fair to encourage employers to participate, both on a temporary basis during construction as well as on a permanent basis. Vill. Construction Contractor Parking There will be limited parking for construction foremen within the fenced construction area All other construction workers must park off -site. The off -site construction parking will be located on the dirt lot behind the electrical substation at 900 East Hamilton Avenue, the "Maxim" site. This dirt lot will be temporarily fenced and signage will be posted as appropriate. Webcor Builders, the construction contractor, has a relationship with the owners of 900 Hamilton and they are working directly with them to finalize this arrangement. The general contractor will be responsible for enforcement. Violations will be subject to $50 fines and towing Trucks entering the property from unauthorized routes will he fined $150. These financial penalties have been very successful at other properties. IX. Implementation Once the Parking Plan has been approved, information will be disseminated to the tenants in the following ways: A. Informational Packets: 1 Shuttle rider packet, including maps and instructions; 2. On -site parking packet, including maps and instructions; 3. Car pool rider packet, including maps and instructions; 4. County Transit rider packet, including maps and information; 5 Bicycle rider packet, including maps and information Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 15 PruneYard Construction Period - Parking Plan B. Tenant Information Meetings C. Memos - Regular updates on any changes to timetables and other updates to the Parking Plan will be sent to all PruneYard tenants. D. Postings/Flyers: 1. Office building lobbies 2. Shuttle sites and buses E. Retail Merchants Association Meetings X. Compliance Many measures are being taken to mitigate the loss of parking during construction. The integrated plan seeks to get tenants to park off -site via the off - site shuttle program and encourages alternative methods of transportation. The plans also offers an extensive attendant -assist stacking and valet parking program. Even so, there may be some office tenants and patrons who will park in the retail parking areas. In each parking task force meeting tenants have discussed relying on the good will of all tenants to cooperate and the use of peer pressure to assure compliance. If after a period of monitoring, it is clear there is a lack of compliance, the data base parking permit program will be reconsidered with the tenants XI. Parking Complaint Process All parking complaints should be made to the Management Office located at 1999 South Bascom Avenue, Suite 200. Telephor.. number (408) 371-4700. Fax number (408) 371-3831. A complaint form such as the attached Exhibit C can be faxed to the complainant or the information can be taken in person or over the telephone. All complaints will be logged. Each complaint requiring action will be followed up within one day or sooner. A series of complaints in regard to the same attendant or shuttle bus driver will result in dismissal. The complaint process will be handled by our Tenant Administrator. The PruneYard tenants have formed their own parking committee and will appoint a parking ombudsman. Management will provide a copy of each parking complaint to the appointed ombudsman and will work with the ombudsman to resolve each one. Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 16 The PruneYard is GRowING... PARDON OUR DUST!!! All Stores Open During Construction THE PRUNEYARD VISITOR PARK-PNG ONLY 2-H"-r-s- "r-ess All Others, Please Enter Next Driveway =,aA 17 FAS 71 k)120 SIM-N PARKING f� PRUNEYARD Courtesy LZ� a SHUTTLE STOP Operated By: srav - #I . 3'z3' Attendant Assist After *:0Opm See Security For Keys 2077 Bu.ildinb 1 HE i PRUN>;YARD . Attendant Assist Parking Upon Request Leave Keys With Attendant 18'X24' THE PRUNEYARD Courtesy SHUTTLE Service Provided By: an,�co 2'X2' MAGNtIR: I _ iU 3 3 A V WOi5V8 MlnOS v J• r , , pia"baLa �rii i�Hi; ' f hii 9 a La--. a # L in F'. AVM)a„ [i ahoy _ V • 1 April 6, 1998 ED Bruna M. Stroup OR 0 9 IE93 Guido's Restaurant, The PruneYard C� OF C 1875 Bascom Avenue N 190 PANNING pEPT L Campbell, CA 95008 Re: Comments to Parking Plan Draft 2JI2/98 Dew Bruna: Thank you for your comments to the Draft Parking Plan dated 2/ 12/98. A member of the City of Campbell stafiattendcd the 2/12/98 Construction Parking Task Force discussion and subsequently requested the Plan be submitted to them for review by the various City of Campbel: departments. The City's comments were then incorporated into the Construction Period Parking Plan With Revisions By The City of Campbell dated March 27, 1998. You were in attendance at the last Construction Parking Task Force Mceling when it was discussed. Many of the comments' suggestions in your letter dated February 12, 1998 have been incorporated into the Plan . Valet parking has been added to the Plan. It will be available daily between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. in lot 8 between the Towers and in two retail areas (A and B on the site plan) from 5:00 p.m. to 1 1:00 p.m. Thursday through Saturday. Attendant-assist/stacking has also been expanded to accommodate retail customer parking on Thursdays, Fridays and Saturdays to 1 I:00 p.m. We have also identified a portion of Lot 5 across from Campbell Roasting Company for stacking during the day as a back up. Your suggestion for attendant -assist parking for cuswme•stvisitors in Lots 5 and 6 across from Rock Bottom, Guido's and Campbell Roasting will be implemented Thursday through Saturday evenings. Also, we will be experimenting with roping off portions of Lots 5 and 6 for some periods in the morning to reserve as much as wssible of those areas for retail parking. A great cooperative effort by retail and office tenants, the City of Campbell and The PruneYard has been put into the Construction Period Parking Plan. Howevr-, we realize the Plan is not going to cure all existing problems. A complaint process h-- k.—'- ..: in 10 assure that construction period parking problems will be addressed. The Plan is inant to flexible and we anticipate and arc open to making reasonable adjusim-nits as we proceed. Sincerely, Prum:Ywd�ssociatcs, LLC BY W Hi Wilson &Associates IrtsYM/an tng AgeJnt �>rrginia T. Unruh kSen or Property Manager cc: Gloria Sciara 199950ath Bascom Awnue Suile 200 Camphrll CA 95008 TeIO,onr M081371-17(8) A6m11hr (408) 371 -38II JOHN C. VASIL. P.C. ATT .— .1 — $001 SOUTH WASCOM AVENUE, SUITE .220 CAMPBELL. CALWORNIA 05008-2270 PHoNE: I�BI 37 woo0 F— I40aI 3710/045 April 6, 1999 City Council City of Campbell 70 North First St Campbell, CA 95008 RECEIVED APR 0 6 1998 CITY CLERK'S OFFICE RE: Item 17 on the Agenda April 7, 1998 Meeting Pruaeyard parking plan The Notice and recommendation of Planning was mailed to this office April 3, and just received. I've been a tenant in Pruneyard Tower I for about 25 years. 1 wrote to Mr Chavez who was to be coordinating the tenants' parking concerns on February 18, 1998, exp•essing my concerns about the proposed project's impact on parking for the office and retail stores. A copy is enclosed. I cannot at'end the meeting, but 1 would like to have this letter considered in opposition to the issuance of the permits unless they are issued in series. The parking structure should be completed before the other permits are issued. To do otherwise is going to have a significant adverse impact on the business of many tenants pgaicy the retail stores. I don't know what will be said about the tenants' position of the proposed plan; but, from my perspective, the tenants are overwhelmingly opposed to the proposed parking plan. I've seen nothing in the modified parking plans to change my opinion expressed in my February 18, 1998 letter. That proposed plan is not a "good " or "really good" parking plan. This, I understand, was the Council's requirement before the permits would issue. Very truly yours, hn r. Vasil �L 1999 S. BASCOM AVE. S 97-20/UP 97-11 3 OF 7 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLAN. 08/2000 NORTH ELEVATION 11 11 50UTr. ELEVATION PRUNEYARD PLACE C..p.—. C." Rgi... 1 Off... Campbell, CA WILLIAM WILSON • ASSOCIATIS NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS A3.03 Fourth Floor Plan second floor Plan TAW Floor Plan py.l r.r e•r .l r_r PRUNEYARD PLACE C..y...r. C. p R.elo.N O//I... .x <r.'i.r..c. . MN WILLIAM WILSON k ASSOCIATES 'IIt!I1�1 GARAGE i l f' i j t t l ',•.mil 1 1 i t I--- --—i----- ——— ' FIAOR PLANS Eelow Growl Floor Plan Grede ,.w .. . Plan ar .. ..r bl.l ra», .I .a a." "03.1-0 A2.06 M 1 i PRUNEYARD PLACE c..r.... c.q. lMr..l OHlfr WILLIAM WILSON • ASSOGATIS EA5T ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION w�� — • I WEST ELEVATION GARAGE ELEVATION 1- NOQTr !�EVATiON -..� i A3.01 PRUNEYARD PLACE C..p..." C-1 Sgl.uI Offt- C..pb.11, CA 7r4-= &�IIIh I &rwf PAIRTIAL FIFTH FLOOR PLAN rt PART{AL SECOND FLOOR PLAN WILLIAM WILSON A ASSOCIATIRS WALL SECTIONS EAST SIDE ENTRANCE (�R—,A LIVATIO PART I�A.0110UND 'LOOR P-AN AB 01 PRUNEYARD PLACE C..P..... C..P Sq/... 1 0114.. C.. pb.11, CA - WILLIAM WILSON • ASSOCIATSS wr I i l i / PARTIAL FIFTt+. FLOOR PLAN --+- I PAIAL G1RTTHIRD FLOOR "-r AN PL7A,1 a. /�\opo P I AL StGti:J FLOOR PLAN - - - - - - -- �J -�- - EXTERIOR SECTIONS EAR" 6 PARA `L OR PLAN SIUL A8.02 PRUNEYARD PLACE c.51..1 C. a.p...oen... Cup..11, CA •--- I WILLIAM WILSON ASSOCIATIKS P i Ii I IL • 1 I .., w... M �ID PARTiA_ T RRD FLOOR PLAN ` vr 10 . I i �1i0S 1N r. f I rr� —_ I 2 PAST P' SaCOND FLODR _AN_ _ I: ri, EXTERIOR ..... _... WALL. SECTION cARTIA.✓ATION _ FXTF R WAS T o� A TjAL GROUND F_COR -LAN SSIDE � s i i AB 03 1999 S. BASCOM AVE. S 97-20/UP 97-11 3 OF 9 C iTY OF C:AMPBELL PLAN. 12 / 9 9 JOHN G. VASIL ATTOPHC! AT LAW 1 Do I SOUTH BASCOM AVENUE. SUITE I tro CAMPBELL. CALIroRNIA OBoo B•2f70 PHONE: 14051 371 •9000 rAX: 11051 371 •11170B February 18, 199k_ Theodore Chavez Fax only: 371-3504 Re: Pruneyard parking issues for new development Dear Ted, I've had a chance to review the material distributed at the joint landlord/tenant meeting held on February 12. In addition, I've spoken to several office tenants regarding the proposed construction. It appears to me that the Management team wants tenant approval of a parking plan that would least disturb the tenant's occupancy. This is a fine object but it overlooks that the office tenants overwt„imin& believe that the project as planned, will be very disruptive to their business. They belie, the project as planned will result in significant and possible disastrous business losses or setbacks for the period of construction and well thereafter. Perhaps there is a misunderstanding of the purpose of the joint efforts on the pa' ing problem. If the purpose of these meetings is to come up with the best possible parking plan under the circumstances, then your group is on the right track. I> however, the purpose is to come up with a parking plan "that works", you have not succeeded yet in my opinion. Most tenants I've talked to agree with me. These tenants do not understand why the plan to build the parking garage first as originally represented, was abandoned. If the Pruneyard management is representing to the City that the consLuction of the garage and new office budding at the same time would be the least disruptive to the tenants, it is a belief not shared by the tenants I've talkec The logical plan is to build the _ Aing garage first. Ted, I know there is a "silent majority" of the office tenants that feel the way I do; so, if and when a report is sent to the City of Campbell, please do not make it sound as if the tenants accept the parking proposal finally agreed to through your hard work with Pruneyard Management. The serious concerns of the tenants should be a part of your report. Many of us have been here since the Pruneyard Towers I was newly built. One of the principal business reasons for our moving and staying here is the convenience of parking as opposed to downtown San Jose. We've been through many changes with the completion of Pruneyard II and other major changes. We do not oppose the contemplated construction project, but common sense tells us that the parking proposal is not going to work, and that many tenants, particularly the retail stores, will suffer unnecessarily because of the single phase development plans. The garage should be built first and the building permits should be issued accordingly. If you were to poll the office and probably the retail tenants, I'm certain they would agree. The thoughts I want to end with is Lat your hard work on behalf of the tenants is appreciated; but, when you make your final report, please do not leave the City with the impression that the tenants believe that the parking plan is "good", "really good" or that it will work. The opposite is true. kohn G. Vasil MEMORANDUM CMY uP CAMI'HPI I I'UBI IC -1- UIiPAR'IMENT TO: Steve Piasecki DATE: April 1, 1998 FROM: Bill Helms SUBJECT: Pruneyard Building Permit release In order to provide safeguards for the Campisi Street Extension Agreement if Building Permites are issued for tl,: construction of the new office building and parking garage prior to the effective date of the ordinance authorizing execution of that street extension agreement, the applicant should be required to : • Return to the City a signed copy of the Campist Way Street Extension Agreement that will be authorized by the ordinance introduced for first reading on April 7. • Sign an agreement that provides for the payment of S 600,000 to the City for traffic relat-.d improvements in the vicinity of the Pruneyard within 60 days of issuance of the permits CITY OF CAMPBELL March 12.1998 Commumtv Development Department Ms. Virginia Unruh Prunevard Associates, LLC 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 200 Campbell. CA 95008 FAX (408) 371-3831 Re: Temporary Parking Plan -- Pruneyard Place (SDP 9 7-01) Dear Virginia: The Community Development Department and the Pubic Works Department have had an opportunity to review the Draft Construction Period Parking Plan dated February 24, 1998. Per our previous discussion, the following revisions would need to be incorporated into the plan prior to referral to the City Council: I. Primary Off -Site Parking: The City is currently under contract with WTA for the development of Winchester drive-in site. Given the uncertainty of the long term availability of the property, the drive-in site can not be designated as the primary off -site parking location for the shuttle service. If a single location cannot be found to accommodate all of the off -site parking demand, the utilization of two lots would be acceptable as long as the locations are in the vicinity of one another, and a logical shuttle route can be established. 2. Construction Employees: The plan did not specify a parking location for the construction Workers. As we discussed, an off -site location is required along with verification that the parking would be available during the entire construction period. The off -site location should not be proximate to residential areas. 3. Alternative Transportation: The plan should be more specific about what alternative transportation programs will be available. For example, the program should evaluate the feasibility of carpools, vanpools, and t.,..nsn. Rides for Bay Area Commuters offers substantial technical and administrative assistance ,for alternate mode programs. An aliema!ive mode program should begin, if possible, a month or so in advance of actual construction. RIDES provides the following services: A. Transportation Fair. For a two-hour mid -day period, VTA staff will provide information on services provided, includ'og carpooling and vanpooling progr.ams and Commuter Check, a program whereby employer pays for transit fares. Linda Fumas is Santa Clara coordinator and can be reached at 415-861-7665. 70 North First Street Campbell, Calilornta 93008 1473 rFL 408. 866.7140 FAX 408 866 8381 MD 408. 866.2790 i Ms. Virginia Unruh March 11. 1998 Pave 2 B. Commuter Check. In this program the employer pays for checks that can be redeemed for transit passes at grocery stores (Lucky. Safeway) or for vanpool expenses. This program provides discounts for check purchases. The expenses are tax d^ductible for employers and the benefits are tax free to employees. The RIDES coordinator for this program is Stuart Baker at 281-4307. C. Commuter Matching. RIDES can handle all commuter matching. This program can coordinate any existing entries that are applicable, enter all new entries, and provide matching information. Commuter information could be faxed to the staff at RIDES or the data could be entered through Internet at (www.rides. org). D. ECCO Pass. This is an employer fare program sponsored by VTA. It differs from Commuter Check in that, for a set fee, a company rec^ives transit passes for all employees. The fee is based on an estimate of how many employees are likely to use transit. VTA should probably be contacted to see if this program is preferable to Commuter Check. The VTA coordinator for the ECCO pass program is Scott Haywood at 321-7544. 4. Retail Parking: If unregulated, office tenants and patrons will park in the retail spaces in the shopping center. The parking plan needs to explain how retail parking spaces will be preserved for use by the shopping center customers and employees. 5. Additional On -Site Par in : The plan should identify any additional parking spaces which can be provided on site. For example, angled parking along the north driveways should be explored and, if feasible, implemented with the parking plan. In order for the parking plan to be referred to the City Council meeting of April 7, 1998, the revised parking plan must be submitted to our office no later than March 20, 1998. In regards to finding a location for the off -site parking, there is a possibility that Community Center may be available for a portion of the parking. To further discuss this matter, please contact Bob Kass, Public Works Director at 866-2150. If you have any other questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (408) 866-2143. Sinr:erely, �r Gloria Sciara Planner II cc: Bernard M. Strojny, City Manager Steve Piasecki, Community Development Director Robert Kass, Public Works Director Bill Helms, Environmental Program Manager Peter Eakland, Traffic Engineer MEMORANDUM TO: STEVE FROM: GLORIA DATE: MARCH 11. 1998 RE: PROPOSED GARAGE COLOR--PRUNEYARD The moss green color is present on the arcade level of Tower I and is found in the floor tiles in front of Tower H. The color is a tone within the color range of the other building materials, namely the tinted glass. Given the geographic context of the office buildings and garage, and the axis that is created from the pedestrian walkway from the garage to the office buildings, the moss green color would provide consistency among this building grouping. My feeling is that the moss green color will help tie the buildings together rzther than breaking up the space witha color (beige) t at is only found on the retail side. Ank IU�Narch 09, 1998 2 �ggg Cel/EPA r�ECD AP J PFTEwIIr STATE WATER RESOIIICES CONTROL BOARD MWWV Ado— RHEAY LOKI P 0 a-, 1977 £aaamemo. CA WILLIAM K-.LSON 6 ASSOC 9Ti612-1977 2929 CAMPUS DR STE 450 901 P StZ SAN MATEO, CA 94403 Saasnar,N, CA 95A14 (916) 657-0757 FAX (9,6)657-1 01, RECEIPT OF YOUR NOTICE OF INTENT The State Water Resources Control Board (State water Board) has received and processed your NOTICE OF INTENT TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS R THE GENERAL PERMIT TO DISCHARGE STORM WATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. Accordingly, you are required to comply with the permit requirements. Your WDID identification number in: 2 439309621. Please use this number ir. any future communicatione regarding this permit. SITE DESCRIPTION OWNER: PRUNEYARD ASSOC LLC DEVELOPER: WILLIAM WILSON B ASSOC COUNTY: SANTA CLAR.1 SITE ADDRESS: 1999 SOUTH BASCOM AVE 200 CAMPBELL. CA 95008 COMMENCEMENT DATE. 2/15/98 EST. COMPLETION DATE:B/15/99 When construction is complete or ownership has been transferred, dischargers are required to notify the Regional Water Board by submitting a Nocice of Termination (NOT). All State and local requirements must be met in accordance with Specie). Provision No. 7 of the General Permit. I have enclosed a NOT for your future use. If you do not notify the State Water Bcard that construction activity has been completed you will continue to be invoiced for the annual fee each January. If you have any questions regarding permit requirements, please contact your Regional Water Board at (510) 286-1255. Sincerely, V'. stvlr `" b Audrey Shimizu Storm Water Unit Division of Water Quality Enclosure 02/23/1,398 16:47 408.2489641 DAVID POWPS ASSOC PACE 02 DAVID J. POWERS mm siiiml!llml"la February 23, IM 7R tisast Cmil" GA 9500g RIl: 611tod Etmerttloa butid Sttidy Da.r�la.l.: a Dery I. Powers end Assmommis, Inc. (D(PAA) is plessad to present to you this proposal for tlN�tlbn of an Initial �y fbr the extanamn of Cempitri Way which would provide a eb the Pntseyard tboppirti center }Parrs Hamilton Avenue, within the City of tta For p*0 1 would be the Principal, and Kathy Kovar would be the Project Manager. Oat would be billed on a tune and rontenals huta in accordance with the attached fee OW&jt and would not exceed a a aalrturn of $11,214. We understand that time is of the Ilk n � eta". Rdsrava, wean aD11ga1ad to bwar our seisti" cammionents to meet previous bat as other ptojaeb. to addBion, our now consultants we bads -logged because of fog dDIM f11r btft robe meanasnatb. It is mold pato:d that the soonest we cotd oalo* a rbntplalad adtNnittretive daft Ietisf Soedy is the lass week in March. Irk fps �Yt eatlmate ml fo[bws etcl do w it -horse boos and � �o� expenses, as well u the ins casts fbr the noise Body. If ibis proposal is aoceptablc you, a dated, oosUltkal�Md ems' of this low proposal rsttrned to us will serve n our binding legal aras wt Ibr dw work ofeaCrI 'bush, .1S•. j I 6w�t C..iwb At Fa— tsntnr�.a.•sdsrsor•>rter..cantx•nt.stotwo.F, 400249w.I 02/23/1998 16: 47 4082489641 DavID i'OwERS 4550C onGE 113 1 spiala r , ?d Y heaiute to cell tr douW you have any qucet:am or concerns. hunk you for be for We ptopooL We look forward to contieulog to work with vw. T David J. Powto t , Principal Kathy Kovar Project Manger efr� R.r aeh.ac� �. a A!l YED AND AUTHORIZED BY- t anuYe ttpetmttou ibr . i r7 f' 4s it 6t Vs R? 1? 02/23/1998 16:47 4082489641 64v1p t'Ot£nS oSSX • i� SCOPE OF WORK CAMPISI WAY EXTENSION INITIAI. STUDY D1pAA pro►_vea to Prepare an Initial Study in accordance with the California"*612matpCal Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines and the City of Campbell'he Cancnrl tegethnneata. It is onr udenssmd►rng that the Propt j� is an of extension of Campisi Way Of eOrtstruction Of s 42 foot rigMof-way tO provide i northern connection to the AfAoeyad ShOppitq Center. Due to the fact that we Meetly completed an Initial Study for ** Pad Project we rttmicipek that we will be able to use some of the information we $01ho paeyiot* (i.e., fho traffic study) a reduce the time and rMA that it would °01—y Uhe 10 psepae an bullish Sally. our oprtt'Mi des preparation of a Draft Initial Sally which would adJmss the impacts and egaYed mhption for the proposed roadway eaerurion. Tot A: 5ett/Ie UcMoR Mertltq DIP&A would attend one meetin` with City staff to confirm the scope of the Initial Study and to define the project In addition, DIPAA will conduct • site vimk so evaluate sir conditions. TM& W. Fr"snatbu of flat Adinialstsative Desk laMW Study The 1Ntisl Study will describe the cutting environmental arming and include an eapl ustion of the potential oupeets to ft-9 from the project. Mitigation memstm will be identified to reduce impacts to ■ non -significant level. Supporting the doetsmem wdl be maps, photographs, tables, and other graphlos as SWO!"i)ats, to ill the proposed projem and suounsm= information presented in the Initial Study" The Initial Study will be consiarnt with the CEQA Guidelines and will include the following sections and appropt a yhnnkntal wysls. faclaw.dSaid PM#MDes,11 dew The Initial Sally will inclWo relevant background information on the site hnrory. and a d-npdm of the proposed roadway improvementThe design elarnatd and BMails Of this project will be provided. This section will _:..o Inchsds a daealptlon Of the objectives of the proposed project. P. mmffl to CEQA Guidelines Section 15063, the Initial Study will include a discuislon of the pro,,W,s consistency with relevant lad use gosfs, plans, and policies. 02/23i1998 16:47 4082489541 14vID nMCF 5 ASSX c43E 05 ffa 6% Env6onnneWd Checkfer Fann Each Initial Study will include an Favironmcatal Checklist. '.he checklist will be used to identify potentially significant impacts resulting from development of the proposed protect. Dbcaosi- V/J%"4Vk—r Exri,lre —asia/ Eff— The Initial Study will include a discussion of potentially significant enviroarnental affecb that ate identified in the Checklist. It is presently anticipated that the major environmental issues will be land use and roix, as described below. Lwd Use The Initial Study will describe the existing land uses within the proposed roadway alignment as well as edJeorm to the alignment. The potential land use compatibility Impacts of placing a road adjacent to an existing residential building will abo be addressed. It is our understanding that appropnate mitigation measures wi!i be include in the project that meets the City's threshold fa malimunir,g normal residential setbacks. IMnspendbn and Cinvfarion The Initial Study will describe the existing rusdway network and traffic volmnes, based upon a tsu}Hc analysis pmviouly prepascd by Limcoa. Law and Grsenapais. Conesdring 7Fanuporraaan Dopier— The Initial Study will describe the potential trrific and circulation impacts from the project, and describe how access to the existing Ably Apartments may be a::ected The loss of parking spaces will also be addressed. It is out understanding that mitigation measures will be included in t::e project to adequately reduce signifStaot impacts. Nate A noise study will be performed by Edward Pack Associates, Noise Consulsa rrs to dmarvine the impact of the project on the Alolie Apartment complex. Of particular concern is the increase in traffic adjacent to the existing residential buildings and the se its from the noise sources. It is our u detftandhig that mitigation measures will be included in the project to adequsachy rcdua noise W.Vacts. Gealap sued Jai The Initial Study will describe the Squeal soil craracteristics of the project area and will address the potential for liquefaction, ground slaking or other M 02/23/1998 16:47 Trutt c: Tai W. Test%: TI* V. 40874896411 Iwv ID POWEPS ASSOC PIYaE 06 t seismic lia:ards. 11 is our rmdm<tentli sg dat due identified lend fill does not a mil to On plipoeed cxgmian dlOrnent. It is anticipewi dim standard buildi% design end comtruction mcbnrq ss will be dequate to offset any pormrtial imput and would provide r itigation. Repcode,etfa &W DdjvM of Adofelstratt" Drift IaM al Study D]PRA will etrbmit two (2) copies of the Administrative Draft Initial Study to City Staff for review and eorrerent. 1PreWafta of Draft WIW Study The adnhtfslsadve ebeft Initial Study will be revised, based upon the cs onuote reeaivW from the pUnni rg Deparbrient. Two double -sided copies would be primed of the Initial Sally. including one "men -ready copy would be submitted to 60 City Plmairq Deparbaed. It is anticipated that the City would prepare tsopies for disalbutla . prtPusdea IleArd" Modlariq Few— DIP&A will psepate a Mitlptbn Monitoring Propam for the proposed project which eurnstuerrhm it* mitiption treasures identified for all tignifit'" WFICIS dot mpon1pk tlon agency or indivikal. the ,mleffYig phase, stud the erilbtca l mi( or monitoring agency. pnparatisa at lbw 1~ Stedy/pMadw DJPtA will :egad 10 comnmds received on the Whig Study during Use public mvew period on the ratieipsssd MM gmixi Negative Daelmetion. tutu required by CEQA. Issuance of a Midg ied Negative Declsrsrion will require that all project impacts be reduo d to a less don significant level with mitigation mOM M dull me included as put of the project DIP&A will eOmd 01711 Public - ' 6 (PlesuskI Commission meeting). At the public Irsesieg we will be prepared to present the findings of the Initid Study, if mpnod. We expect 10 bm an opportunity to review the findings three days prier to any public MWdnp on the project to ensure the defensibility of the arviomsental review prooem. L{ 0.'/23/199P 15: J7 Jp82JP96J1 DAVID P06 PS ASSOC PAGE 08 I? LT MTED COST BnAICDOWN C-NIt1 Way Krim"" 11t 4 ar -Omft f- the C-Vktion Of On Initul Shcdy. 1' Tow Mb Avf IIN1r W . , 4 dNb Vial 343 ? ' 30 ArYYuotir DM S2.7t0 low :I t IM 5 5435 T 1�A u � t 57,If4.N of Ripwb SIOD.00 a �4 NM* � �l�l°' $SDD.o0 $3.450.00 TodC4tt 511.214.0 I; 02/23/1998 16: 47 4082489641 DAVID POWPS ASSOC PAGE 07 r t �DI1Lt i i p . DJIMA pmpom the 1b0owfnj optimum schcduk far preparation of the Initial Study for the C-*M Wry eata,ion. D"A can commit to tnsinta MS the schedule in the area which 14, am %"On ow control. TudMedmot Completed at and of Wo* vo suillmorindomb of ftdm al Week 2 I4hW Waak e Week S PION Ir1AiY bndy pa* Carman, and vAmk lbr citudstim Week 6 NDf Week 10 Week 11 M CoMpIvft 12 Weeks some" 7Se oast of ptepmarion of the hmW Si dy is esdmsoed nor to cxceed s nm=lum of SI IMM.00 In accordance wl& the aweltsd budget and fee schedule. All cow would be a IF time and mewdsk blade ew®waarnm wfih work completed. Please note War *i taredula sawmp to d onessery' projectteiskd information (e.i plam copies of Irsrt wrdiW etc..) will be wall!" upon wMhorbatbtt to proceed. A breakdown of the hdrllf eladf cost eMlarssr by 0* a wdl a our chap tme schedule is aeuched. William Wilson and Associates Pruneyard Place Office wilding and Garage Campbell, California Tedu&al Specifkatlors prepared by KenKay Associates February 1998 A n TABLE OF CONTENTS t 11 I GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 01530 Tree and Plant Protection 2 SITE WORK 02810 Irrigation System 02870 Site Furnishings 02920 Soii Preparation, Soil Mixes and finish Grading 02950 Trtes, Shrubs, Ground Cover! and Ornamental Grasses 02970 Landscape Maintenance 3 NOT USED q NOT USED 5 NOT USED 6 NOT USED 7 NOT USED 8 NOT USED 9 NOT USED 10 NOT USED I I NOT USED 12 NOT USED 13 NOT USED Iq NOT USED 15 NOT USED 16 NOT USED Note For Soil Investigation Data, General Conditions, Supplementary Conditions and all cross - refeneoced specification sections, see the project manual by Homberger + Worstell, 1.5.98. Section 01530-1 TREE R PLANT PROTECTION PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 RELATED DOCUMENTS The C-eneral Conditions, Supplementary Conditions and Division I apply to this Section. 1.02 SUMMARY A. Furnish all labor, materials and equipment to complete the Work of this Section. B. The Work of this Section includes, but is not limited to: 1. Protection: Protect existing trees, shrubs and vegetation which are to remain. C. Related Work specified elsewhere: 1. Cutting R Patching: Section 01045 2. Construction Facilities: Section 01500 3. 0.molition: Section 02060 4. Site Preparation: Section 02100 5. Earthwork: Section 02200 6. Trees, Shrubs, Vines, Ground Coven R Ornamental Grasses: Section 02950 7. Cast to Place Concrete: Section 03300 1.03 REFERENCES AND STANDARDS A. Consulting Arborist: Barrie D. Coate h Associates 23535 Summit Road Los Gatos. CA 95030 (408) 353-1052 (plane) B. International Society of Arboriculture (1 S.A.) Western Chapter 3610 N 44th Street, Suite 240 PhoemA, Arizona W18 (602) 955-5315 PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 PROJECTIVE FENCSNG Four f et wide, Mack polypropylene barrier fencing. Burke, or approved equal: steel. U - shaper) stake supports. At contractor's iption, chain - link or alternative fencing my be submitted to Owner's Representative for revif , _- "W . A MUNEYARC 17w41 Fhnary. 19" C—Pban, Cdd— ' Section 01530-2 (■' TREE & PLANT PROTECTION PART 3 - EXECUTION A •' 3.01 PROTECTION * A. Existing tree.%, shrubs and vegetation designated to remain shall be protected from physical damage and maintained at all time during the couu of construction. A B. Grading required under tree drip line shall be done only when approved in advance by the Consulting Arborist (Arborist). All requirements for root zone protection and mitigation as recommended by the I Arborisi shall be followed P7 C. No storage of equipment or any materials, whatsoever, of any tree designated to remain shall occur t within the drip line within planting area. .� D. Existing tress, shrrbs aid plants .icsignated to remain shall be protected against unnecessary cutting, beating cr sunning of the roots, skinning and bruising of the bark, smothering of roots within the drip line, excess foot or vehicular traffic, ar parking of vehicles within the drip line. Temporary fences and barncides shall be installed at shown on the drawings and maintained as required or as instructed. n r 3.02 DAMAGE TO TREES OR SHRUBS A. The Contractor shall provide the Owner with monetary compensation for all trees damaged in accordance with standards established by the International Society of Arboriculture II.S.A.). The amount of compensation shall be determined using I.S.A. formulas for computing the value of shade trees. The Arb.nist shall be the sole judge of compensation for replacement and/or mitigation. B. in atWition to the above, any trees designated to remain within the limit of work line that arc damaged during construction shall be replaced with three, 24 inch box trees. The consulting Arborist shall be the sole judge as to whether the dansage to the existing tree shall warrant replacement. END OF SECTION - -- 902 A PRUNEYARD PLACE Pseraq, 1998 ,GlifuW Section 02810-1 IRRIGATION SYSTEM PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 CONDITIONS OF THE CONTRACT The General Conditions, Supplementary Conditions and Division 1 apply to this Section. 1.02 SCOPE OF WORK nd a _ furnish labor. rtation A. Work specified in this o connection wit, and reassonablysinc dental tolcomplete installation of the A and perform all Operations in automatic sprinkler irrigation systems as shown on the drawings. Items hereinafter are included as w aid to take off, and art not necessarily a complete list of work items. 1. Field verification of existing site conditions, points of connection, and equipment to be salvaged, l f to remain operational or to be replaced. 2. Trenching, stockpiling, exuvation. backfill materials and refilling trenches. 3. Furnishing materials and installation for complete system including slaving, conduit, piping, n backflow prevention assembly, valves, fittings, sprinkler heads, automatic controls and firal adjustment of valves and irrigation outlets to insure complete and uniform coverage. 4. Line voltage connections to the irrigation controllers and low voltage control wiring from controllers to remote control valves. 5. Replacement of unsatisfactory materials. & Clean-up, inspection and approvd. 7. All work of every description menurmed in the specification and/or addenda thereto, and all other labor, and materials reasonably incidentalto the sausfactory completion of the work, including dean -up of the site, as directed by the Landscape Architect. 8. Tests. 9. Record drawings. B. Related work provided under other sections: 1. Irrigation slaving under streets and parking lot paving. 2. 120 volt A.C. electrical stub -out to controller locations. 1.03 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS A. OSHA Compliance: All Uric,,, and service covered by this specification shall meet or exceed the caktY r standards m established under the Federal Occupational Safety and Health AA of 1970. together w aerndments in effect as of the date of this specification. —� B. Codes and Standards: Comply with all applicable code and standards. 1. All work and materials %lull be in full accordance with the aw. by toles the Western Plumbing �. National Electric Code: the Uniform Plumbing Code. publishedPRUNEYARD PLACE 9802-A Campbell, CA Feh—y 1998 r. Section 02810.2 IRRIGATION SYSTEM r Officials Association; and other State or local laws or regulations. Nothing in these Drawings or A Specifications is to be construed to permit work not conforming to these codes. s 2. When the Specifications call for materials or construction of a better quality or larger size than A required by the above mentioned rules and regulations, the provision of the Specifications shall I take precedence over the requirements of the said rules and regulations. 3. The Contractor shall furnish without any extra charge any additional material and labor when required for compliance with these rules and regulations, though the work may be not mentioned in these particular Specifications or shown on the Drawings. n 4. Tlx Contractor shall erect and maintain barricades, guards, warning signs, and lights as necessary I or required by OSHA regulations for the protection of the public or workmen. q 5. Any existing utilities, buildings, equipment, piping, pipe covering, sewers, sidewalks, landxaping, and other improvements, damaged by the Contractor during the course of this work shall be replaced or repaired by the Contractor in a manner satisfactory to Landscape Architect and at Contractor's expense, and before final payment is made. The Contractor shall be responsible for damage caused by leaks in the piping systems being installed or having been installed by him. He shall repair, at his own expense, all damage so caused, in a manner satisfactory to Landscape Architect. • • 6. The Contractor shall pay for all permits, licenses, and fees required. 1.04 SUPERVISION AND WORKMANSHIP The Contractor, personally or through an authorized and competent representative, shall supervise the work constantly, and shall as far as possible keep the same foreman and workman on the job from commencement to completion. The workmanship of the entire job must in every way meet or exceed industry standards, and only experienced and competent workmen will be allowed on the job. I.OS LAYOUT OF WORK The Contractor shall stake out the irrigation system as shown on the Drawings. These areas shall be checked by the Contractor and Landscape Architect before construction is started. Any changes, deletions or additions shall be determined at this check. 1.06 INSTRUCTION After the system has been installed and approved, Contractor shall instruct the Owner's representative in complete operation and maintenance of the irrigation system. 1.07 SUBMITTALS A. Within two weeks from award of contract, submit 6 copies of catalogue information on materials which are to be installed under this contract. No substitution will be permitted without prior written approval by the Landscape Architect. Complete material list including catalogue cut sheets shin be submitted prior to performing any work. 9802-A February 1998 PRUNEYARD PLACE Campbell, CA A Section 02810-3 IRRIGATION SYSTEM B. Record Dnwirgs: A I . The Contractor shall maintain in good order in tb..,eld office one complete set of black line prints of all sprinkler drawings which form a pan of the contract, showing all water lines, sprinklers, valves, controllers and stub -outs. In the event any work is not installed as indicated on the Drawings, such work shall be corrected and dimensioned accurately from two permanent landmarks. 2. All connections to existing irrigation systems, underground stub -outs for furore connections and valves shall be )mated and dimensioned accurately from two permanent fixed points on all record drawings. .. 3. Mainline and wine routing shall be located and dimension, J at maximum intmals of 200' along entire installation. 4. Upon completion of the work, obtain reproducible prints from Landscape Architect and neatly correct the prints to show the as -built conditions. I PART 2 - MATERIALS 2.01 PIPE AND FITTIN^-S A. Main lines (constant pressure) shall be polyvinyl chloride PVC 1120-Schedule 40 solvent weld plastic pipe in conformance with ASTM 1784 Standards. 1. Join lengths by using Schedule 40 PVC solvent weld couplings on Schedule 40 pipe. 2. Fittings: a. Main Line: At changes in direction or branch mains, use appropriate one-piece fittings as approved by the Uniform Plumbing C.,de. b. Solvent Weld Main. Lines. A• changes in direction m branch mains, use appropriate Schedu!. 40 PVC solvent weld fittings as approved by the Uniform Plumbing Code. B. Lateral lines (non -pressure); shall be 1120-200 PSI PVC plastic pipe. All lateral lines shall be connected with Schedule 40, Type 1, Grade I, PVC <olvent weld fittings. C. Connections between main lines and RCV's shall be constructed from Schedule 80 PVC (threaded both ends) nipples and fittings. D. Connections between mainlines and QCV's shall be constructed from Schedule 80 PVC (threaded both ends) nipples and fittings. E. Risess shall be as follows: Schedule 80 PVC threaded nipples. Schedule 80 PVC ells, and KBI flex risen as shown in the construction details. 2.02 QUICK COUPLING VALVES Q,dck coupling valve "P be as listed on the Drawings. 2.03 CONTROLLERS AND ENCLOSURE ASSEMBLIES Controller and enclosure assemblies shall be as listed on the Drawings. 9802-A PRUNEYARD PLACE February 1998 Campbell, CA Section 02810-4 IRRIGATION SYSTEM 2.04 REMOTE CONTROL VALVES Remote control valves shall be globe pattern with glass filled nylon body and bonnet, brass flow stem and manual bleed petcock. Sizes of remote control valves shall be as listed on the Drawings. A 2.05 GATE VALVES Pill Cate valves shall be bronze construction with operating wheel and screwed connections. Install in 10" diameter plastic valve box as detailed. 2.06 LOW VOLTAGE WIRE t4 a A. Low Voltage Control wine to remote control valves shall be copper with U.L. approval for direct burial in ground, size as noted on drawings. Common ground wire shall have white insulating jacket; control n wire shall have insulating jacket of color other than white. Splices shall be made with 3M DBY seal packs. Provide a separate ground wire for each controller. 2.07 VALVE BOXES • t A. Valve boxes for remote control valves sha!l be Carson Model 1419 plastic valve box with boll -down '-fplastic lid. Lid shall be marked: "Irrigation Control Valve". vs B. Valve boxes for gate valves shall be Carson Model 910 round plastic valve box with bolt -down "T" Lid. Lid dull be marked "Irrigation Control Valve". 2.08 SPRINKLER HEADS AND EMITTERS All sprinkler heads and emitters shall be as listed on the Drawings. 2.09 BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE Backflow prevention device a existing and shall remain operational. 2.10 MISCELLANEOUS INSTALLATION MATERIALS A. Solvent cement and printer far solvent weld joints shall be of snake and type approved by manufacturer(s) of pipe and fittings. Cement shall be maintained at proper consistency throughout use. B. Pipe joint compound shall be non -hardening, non -toxic materials designed specifically for use on dreaded connections in water carrying pipe. 2.11 MISCELLANEOUS EnUIPMENT "- A. Provide all equipment called for by the Drawings. B. Provide to the Owner's Repr_senative, at completion of the Maintenance Period, three (3) each o' all operating and servicing keys and wrenches required for complete maintenance and operation of allwads and valves. Include all wrenches necessary for complete disassembly of all heads and valves. 9902-A PRUNEYARD PLACE February 1998 Campbell. CA Section 02810-5 IRRIGATION SYSTEM A PART 3 - INSTALLATION A .1 3.01 PREPARATION pA Schedule and coordinate placement of materials and equipment in manner to effect the earliest completion of work in conformance with construction and progress schedule. 3.02 HANDLING AND STORAGE A. protect work and materials from damage during construction and storage as directed by Landscape Architect. n B. Handle plastic pipe cue' ully: especially protect it from prolonged exposure to sunlight. .h 3.03 LAYOUT A. Lay out work as accurately as possible in accordance with diagrammatic drawings. B. Where site conditions do not permit location of piping, valves and heads where shown, notify Landscape Architect immediately and detamme relocation in joint conference. C. Run pipelines and automatic control wiring in common trenches wherever practical. D Install pipelines and wire within 1120-200 PSI PVC Plastic Pipe Slaving when passing beneath hwdscape in excess of 4' across. 3.04 EXCAVATION AND TRENCHING A. Excavation shall be in all cases ample in $im to permit the pipes to be laid at the elevations intended and to permit ample space for joining. B. Make Wenches for pipelines dap enough to provide minimum cover from finish grade a follows: 1. Ill" minimum cover over all main lines to control valves and quick coupling valves. 2. 18" minimum cover over low voltage control wires from controller to valves. 3. 12" minimum cover ova RCV controlled lateral lines to sprinkler heads and eminers. C. Restore surfaces, utilities, existing underground insWlations, and other improvements, damaged or cut as a result of excavations, to original conditions in manner approved by Landscape Architect. D. Where other utilities interfere with lmganon trenching and pipe work, adjust the trench depth as instructed by Landscape Architect. 3.05 ASSEMBLING PIPELINES A. All pipe ilull be assembled free from dirt and pipe scale. Field cut ends shall be reamed only to full pipe diameter with rough edges and burn removed. 9802-A February 1999 PRUNEYARD PLACE Campbell. CA Section 02810.6 IRRIGATION SYSTEM 1' B. Solvent Weld Joint: P1 I . Prepare joint by first making sure the pipe end is square, then debarring the pipe end and cleaning pipe and fitting of din, dust and moisture. A 2. Dry -insert pipe into fitting to check for mis-sizing. Pipe should enter fitting 1/3 to 2/3 depth of socket. A 3. Coat die inside socket surface of the fining and the fitting and the male end of the pipe with P-70 pnmer (manufactured by Weld -On). Then without delay, apply Weld -On 711 cement liberally to the male end of the pipe and also apply 711 cement lightly to the inside of the socket. At this rq time, apply a second coat of cement to the pipe end. 4. Insert pipe immediately into fitting and turn 1/4 turn to distribute cement and remove air bubbles. .. The pipe must seat to the bottom of the socket and fining. Check alignment of the fitting. Pipe and fining shall be aligned properly without strain to either. 5. Hold joint still for approximately thirty (30) seconds and then wipe the excess cement from the pipe and fitting. 6. Cure joint a minimum of thirty (30) minutes before handling and at least six (6) hours before allowing water in the pipe. C. Threaded Joint: I . Field threading of plastic pipe or finings is not permitted. Factory -famed threads only will be pemutted. 2. Factory -made nipples shall be used wherever possible. Field -cut threads in metallic pipe will be permitted only where absolutely necessary. When field threading, cut threads accurately on axis with sharp dies. 3. All threaded joints, except those directly contacting sprinkler inlets, shall be made up with pipe joint compound. Apply compound to mule threads only. 4. Whore assembling metallic pipe to metallic fitting or valve, no more than three (3) full threads shall show when joint is made up. 5. Where assembling to threaded plastic fitting, take up )omt no more titan one full turn beyond had tight. 6. When artembling soft metal (brats or copper) or plastic pipe, use strap type friction wrench only; do not use mxW-jawed wrench. D. Cap or plug openings as pipeline is assembled to prevent entrance of din on obstructions. Remove caps or plugs only when necessary to continue assembly. E. Where pipes or control wires pass through sleeves, provide removable non -decaying plug at ends of sleeve to prevent entrance of earth. 3.06 REMOTE CONTROL VALVES A. Install where shown on Drawings and group together where practical. Limit one remote control valve per box - No Exceptions. 9902 A PRUNEYARD PLACE Febrtury 1998 Campbell, CA 4 q Section 02810-7 IRRIGATION SYSTEM R B ' LAY.ate valve boxes 12" from and perpendicular to walk edges, buildings and walls. Provide 12" between valve boxes where valves arc grouped together. A C. Thoroughly flush main line before installing valve. D. Install in shrub or ground cover areas where possible. E. Label control line wire at each valve with a 2 1/4" x 2 3/4" polyurethane I.D. tag, indicating r identification number of valve (controller and station number). Attach label to control wire. 3.07 AUTOMATIC CONTROL WIRE A. Run wire along mains wherever practical. Tie wires in bundles with pipe wrapping tape at 10' intervals and allow slack for contraction between strappings. Do not tape wires together where contained within conduit B. Loop a minimum of duce (3) feet of extra wire in each valve box; control wire, ground wire and spare wire. C. Connections shall he made by twisting wires witun wire nuts and scaling with specified seal packs. D. Splicing will be permitted only on runs exceeding 2500'. Locate all splices at valve locations within valve boxes. F. Where control lines pus under paving, they shall pass through PVC sleeves or conduit. 3.04 AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER A. Provide and install automatic vrigarioo controller in approximate locations shown on Drawings. The exact location will be determined on the site by Landscape Architect. Provide conduit and wire and connect to 120 volt switch accessible to controller for ease of maintenance. B. Connect control lines to controlla in sequential arrangement according to assigned identification number of valve. Each control line wire shall be labeled at controller with a permanent non -fading label indicating station number of valve controlled. Attach label to control wim. 3.09 SPRINKLER HEADS, EMITTERS AND QUICK COUPLING VALVES (QCV) A. Thoroughly flush lines before installing heads, emitters or QCV's. B. Locate heads, emitters and QCV's as shown in the Drawings and Details. C. Adjust sprinkler heads and emitter outlets for proper distribution and trim. D. Install Lawn heads 1/2" above grade in seeded lawn area at time of installation. Lowa to finished grade after turf is well established and u directed by Landscape Architect. 9802•A February 1999 PRUNEYARD PLACE Campbell, CA Section 02810-8 IRRIGATION SYSTEM 3.10 TESTING A A. Perform test as specified below. Remake any faulty joints with all new materials. Use of cement or caulking to seal leaks is absolutely prohibited. N B. The Contractor shall: 1. Notify Landscape Architect at least three (3) days in advance of testing. ' 2. Perform testing at his own expense. t7 C. Center load piping with small amount of bacldill to prevent arching or slipping under pressure. No 1 fitting shall be covered. D. Apply the following tests after weld plastic pipe joints have cured at least 24 hours. l . Test live (constant pressure) and QCV lines hydrostatically at 125 PSI minimum. Lines will be approved if test pressure is maintained for six (6) hours. The Contractor shall make tests and repairs as necessary unul test conditions are met 2. Test RCV controlled lateral lines with water at line pressure and risers capped, and visually inspect • for leaks. Retest after correcting defects. 3.11 BACKFILLING A. Backfill only after piping has been tested, inspected and approved. B. Backf.8 material shall be the earth excavated from th-_ trenches, free from rocks, concrete chunks, and other foreign or coarse materials- Carefully select backftll that is to be placed next to plastic pipe to avoid any sharp objects which may damage the pipe. Where excavated material is not suitable for backfill, import clean sand to use as backfill material. C. All pipe and slaving under asphalt paving shall be backfilled with 4" of clean sand on W sides of Pipe. D. Puce backfill materials in 6" layers and compact by jetting and/or tamping to a minimum compaction of 90 percent of original soil density. E. Dress off areas to finish grades and remove excess soil, rocks or debris remaining after backfill is completed. F. If settlement occurs along trenches, and adjustments in pipes, valves, sprinkler heads, emitter outlets, soil, sod or paving are necessary to bring the system, soil, sod or paving to the proper level or the permanent grade, the Contractor, as pan of the Work under 0us contract, shall make all adjustments without extra cost to the Owner. 3.12 GUARANTEE A. It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to fill and repair all depressions and replace all necessary lawn and planting due to the settlement of irrigation trenches for one year following completion and acceptance of the job. 9902-A PRUNEYARD PLACE February 1998 Campbell, CA I A Section 02810-9 RRI IGATION SYSTEM B. The Contractor shall also guarantee all materials, equipment and workmanship furnished by him to be A free of all defects of workmanship and materials, and shall agree to replace at his expense, at any time 1 within one yew after installation is accepted, any and all defective parts that may be found. MR 3.13 CLEAN-UP When wexlc of this section has been com-'eted and at such other times as may be d'uated, remove all truh, debris, surplus materials and equipment om site. • END OF SECTION - PRUNEYARD PLACE Campbell, CA nSection 02870-1 SITE FURNISHINGS A PART I - GENERAL II `' 1.01 RELATED DOCUMENTS The General conditions. Supplementary Conditions and Division I apply to this Section. A 1.02 SUMMARY A A. Furnish all labor, materials and equipment to complete the Work of this Section. • B. The Work of this Section includes, but is not limited to furnishing and installing:: 1. Pra.sst Concrete Planter Pas ^.. Precast Concrete Trash Receptacles 3, Precast Concrete Ash Urns 4. Metal Benches C. Related Work specified elsewhere: 1. Irrigation sleeving: Section 02810 ., Cast - in Ram Concrete. Section 03300 1.03 SUBMITTALS A. Make submittals in accordance with Section 01300. B. Product data: Manufacturer's catalog information indicating size, materials, finishes and quantities of items being supplied. Any deviations in equipment design from Specification requirements :lull be identified and fully described. 1.04 COORDINATION Coordinate items of other wades to be furnished and set i.' place. Such portions of their work as is all a in part embedded, built-in, attached to a supported by the work shall be executed by them in ample time that of the work is not delayed. Any cutting or patching made necessary to comply with this injunetiw progress shill be dare at the General Contractors expense. General Contractor dull be responsible for the proper installation of all accessories embedded in the concrete and fa the provision of holes. openings etc. neceuny to the execution of the work of the trades. 1.05 MANUFACTURER'S DIRECTIONS Manufacturers directions and detailed &swings shall be followed in all caw where the manufacturers of reticles used in this contract furnish directions covering points nor shown in the drawings and _ specifications. 9802 A PRUNEYARD PLACE February I"S Campbell. CA 4 A PART 2 - PRODUCTS Section 02870-2 SITE FURNISHINGS A 2.41 PRECAST CONCRETE PLANTER POTS I all A. Fimish and install round. precast concrete planter pots to be Mediterranean Design by Dura An Stone; or Paseo Series by Magnabie; or approved equal. ^ B. Schedule: See Drawings for locations and quantities. (Dora An Stone Codes Provided.) Type O.D. HT. Design A 4' 30" X ^ B 3 22" X C 2IT' x s C. Furnish with 2" centered drain holes rmd round saucers. D. Color: Match building exterior pane) aggregates and color. 1'. Finish: L.S.B. 2.02 PRECAST CONCRETE TRASH RECEPTACLE A. Furnish and install round. precut concrete trash receptacles to be Mediterranean Design by Dun An Stone; Or Paseo Series by Magnalite; or approved equal. B. Dimensions to be: 31" diameter by 3' height. C. Furnish with anodized aluminum lid. color - bronze. D. Furnish with 20 Gallon galvanized liner. E. Color Match building exterior panel aggregates and colx. F. Finish: L.S.B. 2.03 PRECAST CONCRETE ASH URNS A. Furnish and install round. precut concrete ash ums to be Mediterranean Design by Dun Art Stone; or Pam Series. by Magnalite; or approved equal. B. Dimensions to be 17" diameter by 22" height. C. Furnish with white sod. D. Color: Match building exterior panel aggregates and color. E. Finish. L S.B. gg(D-A PRUNEYARD PLACE Fcbtstary 1999 Campbell. CA I� Section 02870-3 SITE FURNISHINGS 2.04 METAL BENCH A. Furnish and install meal benches, Scarborough series, model SC3005 - BS - 72 woven seat with back. as manufactured by Landscape Forms, (800) 521-2-W, or approved equal. B. Finish, powdercoat, Color: match column mounted light features on the building. PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 LAYOUT Ver.fy eaacl locations of all furnishings with Landscape Architect. 3.02 INSTALLATION A- Install all site furnishings in accordance with the and manufacturer's specification. B. Work to be set true to line and be neat and finished in appearance. Skim to level pas, urns and receptacles as requited- C. Fill ash ums with white sand. D. Secure metal bench legs onto concrete paving with galvanized anchor bolts. Paint to match bench color. 91M-A FeMrry 1999 END OF SECTION - PRUNEYARD PLACE Campbell, CA I Section 02920-1 SOIL PREPARATION, SOIL MIXES AND FINISH GRADING MPART I - GENERAL 0 1.01 RELATED DOCUMENTS I The General Conditions, Supplementary Conditions and Division I apply to this Section. P4 1.02 SUMMARY r j A. Furnish all labor, materials, and equipment to complete the Work of this Section. A B. The Work of this Section includes, but is not limited to: 1. Performance of required soil testing n 2. Cultivation of planting areas ,a 3. Furnishing and installing of soil amendments P1 4. Famishing and installing of fertilizers and conditioners ' S. Fumishing and installing of imported topsoil n r 6. Furnishing and installing soil mixes 7. Finish grading C. Related Work specified elsewhere: 1. Trees, Shrubs, Vines, Ground Covers and OmamenW Grass: Section 02950 2. Landscape Maintenance: Section 02970 1.03 SUBMITTALS A. Furnish 6 cope: of manufacturer, bterature or laboratory analytical data for the following items: 1. Organic amendment - submit sample 2. Commer_ial fertilizers 3. Chemical additives 4. Topsoil -soils laboratory analysis and report B. All submittal daft shall be forwarded in a single package to the Landscape Architect within 30 days of award of the general contract. 1.04 JOB CONDITIONS A. Manufactured materials shall be delivered in original contain . with brand and maker's name marked thereon. Materials in broken containers or showing evidence of damage will be rejected and must be immediately removed from the site. Odorous materials shall not be brought to site. B. Store products to protect them from damage Pnd contamination and comply with manufacturers' storage instructions C. Coordinate this work with other site work- D. Inspect job for conditions which would prevent execution of this work as specified. Do not proceed until such conditions are corrected. 9872-A PRUNEYARD PLACE February 1999 Campbell, CA Section 02920-2 SOIL PREPARATIGN, SOIL MIXES AND FINISH GRADING 1.05 SAMPLES The Owner's Representative reserves the right to take and analyze samples of materials for conformity to P spectftcations at any time. Contractor shall furnish samples upon request by the Owners Representative. Rejected materials shall be immediately removed from the site at Contractor's expense. Cost of testing of materials not meeung specifications shall be paid by Contractor. 1.06 TOPSOIL TESTS A A The Contractor shall take the soil samples of the topsoil !o be used as a planting medium for the project 01 B. Sample shall consist of at least three compciite samplings taken randomly from three separate locations at the source. C . The Contractor shall pay for this test and associated reports. n D. the representative samples) shall be submitted to Soil and Plant Laboratory, Inc., P.O: Box 153, Santa Clan, CA 95052-0153, ph. (408)727-0330, or approved equal. Test shall include analysts of particle sir, organic matter content, soil fertility, pH, sabnity, boron concentration, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) and lime content. t E. Soil amendments and fertilizers listed in this specification we for hldtiiog purposes onI y and will be adjusted based upon the soil lab's report. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 TOPSOIL A. Physical Properties 1. of fraction passing 2.0 nun sieve: Designation: Will be. loamy sand, sandy loam, loam or sandy clay loam and must comply with the following: C" EA 1 Sire once NLIAMW&A MMMWIL-1 Coarse said 0.5 - 2.0 nun 15 0 All sands 0.05 - 2.0 min 85 45 Silt 0.002 - 0.5 min 35 5 Clay 0.002 25 5 2, QMr 0990 Pan:al Sire. Ranae Ma.imttm 9; M111=111a1 Gravel 2 - 13 min 1 0 Rock IR - I inch 10% by volume with now > I inch (lrgaruc IS 0 3. If native subgrade texture is within specified limits, the import topsoil texture should he as similar as practical to that material. PRUNEYARD PLACE 9902-A Campbell, CA February 1999 Section 02920-3 . SOIL PREPARATION, SOIL MIXES AND FINISH GRADING 4. The sum Of silt plus clay of the import wall not exceed that of the subgrade. B. Chemistry: L A pH value of between 5.5 and 7 5, without high qualitative lime content. 1 2. A sodium absorption ratio (SAR) of less than 6.0, M 3. A boron concentration of the saturation extract of less than I ppm. 4. Salinity of the saturation extract conductivity (ECe) at 25 degrees C. less than 3.0 mmhos.cm "1 C. Fertility Considerations: Soil to contain sufficient quantities of available nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium and A magnesium to support normal plant growth. In the event of nutrient inadequacies, provisions shall be r nude to add required materials prior to planting. D. Source: 1. Existing soil on the site amended as specified herein. Inspect existing soil and test it as require under paragraph 1,06 above. or 2. For new planter islands: a. If existing topsoil stockpile exists on site- Inspect existing soil and test it as required under paragraph 1.06, above. b. Import topsoil if on site deficiency exists. Furnish import topsoil from sources approved by Landscape Architect and do all testing in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1.06 above. Make all arrangements for import mP`od and do all work necessary to bring it to standards specified under paragraphs 2.01 above. Transport import topsoil directly from source to final position. H stockpiling is requested, locations and amounts of stockpiles will be approved by Owner's Representative prior to stockpiling. Imparted stockpile shall be subject to inspection by Owner's Representative at the project site. Remove rejected topsoil nmrnediately at Contractor's expense. 2.02 NITROGEN AND IRON FORTIFIED WOOD RESIDUAL ORGANIC AMENDMENTS A. Physical Properties: PERCLMLFAc—SING cMVFDF_¢IGNATION 100 9.51 min 3/8" 95 - 100 6.35 min 1/4" 60 - 100 2.38 mn No. 8 8 mesh 20 - 70 1.00 mm No.18 16 mesh 0 - 30 500 micron No. 35 32 mesh B. Source: Redwood Fir Fir or Sawdust Sawdust Pine Bark C. Nitrogen content 9802-A dry weight basis: min 0.4% min 0.5% min 0.5% February 1998 PRUNEYARD PLACE Campbell, CA Section 02920-4 SOIL PREPARATION. SOIL MIXES AND FINISH GRADING D. Dry bilk density 270.370 270.370 450-580 Ibslcu.yd.: ' E. Iron content: Minimum 0.08% dilute acid soluble iron based on dry weight to be iron ceased. F. Salinity (ECe): Maximum 4.0 millimhos/centimeter at 251C. (Saturation extract conductivity). A G. Organic content Minimum 90% of dry weight by ash method. 2.03 CONTRACTOR'S OPTION: YARD WASTE COMPOST ORGANIC AMENDMENT n 1 A. Gndatbn: A minimum of 90% of she material by weight shall pus a 12" screen. Material passing the 1/2" screen shall sheet the following criteria. A Percent Passing Sieve Designation s 85 - 10o 9.51 mm (3/8") 50 - 80 2.38 mm (No. 8) 0 - 40 500 micron (No. 35) B. Organic eoatmt: Minimum 50% based on dry weight and determined by ash method. Minimum .. 250lbs. organic matter per cubic yard of compost. C. Carbon to nitrogen ratio: Maximum 35:1 if material is cW...ed to be nitrogen stabilized. D. pit: 5.5 - 8.0 as determined in saturated paste E. Soluble salts: Soluble nutrients typically account for most of the salinity levels but sodium should account for less than 25% of the total. To avoid a leaching requirement, the wWiuon of the compost u:dl result in a final ECe of the amended soil of less than 4.0 dS/m ® 25 degrees C. as determined in a sat: ration extract. Use the following table to determine the maximum allowable Ece (dS/m of satumuou extract) of compost at desired use rue and allowable ECe increase. Desired Use Rate Maximum Allowable Eee Increase from Amendment Cu. Yds. Amendment per 1000 Volume sq. ft. for incorponuon to 6" Percentage depth of Amendment 1 dS/m 2 dS/m 3 dS/m Maximum ECe of Compost 1 5 14 28 42 2 11 7 14 21 3 16 5 9.5 14 4 22 3.5 7 10.5 5 27 3 5.5 8.5 6 32 2.5 4.5 7 Example: Specification calls for 6 cu. yrds. compost Per 1000 sq. ft. for incorporation to 6" depth. and site soil has an ECe of 2.0. In order to avoid exceeding ECe of 4 in find blend, compost ECe should be less than 4.5 dS/m. F. Mebture content: 35 - 60% G. Contaminants: The compost shall be free of contaminants such as glass. metal and visible plastic. PRUNEYARD PLACE 9802-A Campbell, CA February 1999 i it Section 02920-5 SOIL PREPARATION, SOIL MIXES AND FINISH GRADING H. Maturity: Physical characteristics suggestive of maturity include: al color: dark brown to black odor: acceptable = none, soil - like, musty or moldy unacceptable = sour, ammonia or putrid panicle characterization: identifiable wood pieces arc acceptable but the balance of material A should be soil - like without recognizable grass or leaves. 2.04 FERTILIZERS AND LIME: FIRST QUALITY AND STANDARD BRANDS A. Controlled Release Fertilizer: Osmocote 17-6-12 plus minors B. Pre -plant fertilizer 6-20-20 �-s C. Potassium Sulfate 0-0.50 D. Soil Sulfur 99% elemental sulfur, fine graded E. lion Sulfate 20% Fe PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 PREPARATION OF SUBGRADE Loosen or scarify the subgrade in area indicated on the Drawings to ten (101 inch minimum depth by ripping across the face of the slope immediately prior to placing topsoil Bring sul,graue to true and uniform grade and clear it of all stones larger than six (6) :aJirs, sucks and other extraneous materials. 3.02 SPREADING OF TOPSOIL Topsoil shall have a minimum depth of eighteen (I8") inches after natural s-element and light roiling and shall conform to finish grades and elevations shown on Contract Documents. Do not place topsoil under muddy or frozen conditions. 3.03 AMENDMENT OF SOIL A. Apply soil amendment and fertilizers in all planting area in strict accordance wit. recommendations obtained from the soil analysis. From initial soils analysis at this site, it may be anticipated that the following will be required for incorporation per 1,000 sf: 7 cubic yards organic amendment 10 lbs. 0-0-50 potassium sulfate 25 Its. soil sulfur The contractor shall use the above for bidding purposes only and shall modify and instal the required chemical additives as per the soils analysis. B. Incorporate amendment thoroughly with top 6" soil layer and remove stones over 1 inch in diameter, roots, clods, weeds and other extraneous material. Bring amended soil to finish grades and elevations shown on Contract Documents. Do not work under muddy conditions. C. Owner's Representative reserves the right to take random samples c ietermine compliance with specifications. Any deviation from the specified amendments will result in the re -incorporation of the amendments. 3.04 PREPARED BACKFILL - PLANT PITS A. Backftll for the top 8 inches of the plant pit: Surface amended soil shall be used as backfill around the sides of the rootballs of convener -gown plants. Depth of placement shall not exceed 8 inches. 9902-A PRUNEYARD PLACE February 1998 Campbell, CA Section 02920-6 4 SOIL PREPARATION. SOIL MIXES AND FINISH GRADING B. Backfill for placement at depths greater than 8 inches: A Amount per cubic yard Native soil with no additional organic amendment 112 pound potassium sulfate 2 pounds iron sulfate C. Blend the above materials thoroughly and uniformly prior to placing in plant pits. M J.OS SURFACE DRAINAGE OF PLANTED AREAS Contractor shall bear final responsibility for proper surface drainage of planted areas. Any discrepancy in the drawings or specifications, obstructions on the site, or prior work done by another party, which the Contractor feels precludes establishing proper drainage shall be brought to the attention of the Landscape Architect in writing for correction or relief of said responsibility. 3.06 FINISH GRADING All landscape areas covered by the project shall be uniformly graded so that finished surfaces are at the elevations toted. Areas to receive future planting soil amendments shall be graded to allow for such mmenal. Finished surfaces shall be reasonably smooth, compacted and free from irregular surface drainage and shall not vary more than 0. 10' from the established grade. Swales shall be finished to permit proper surface drainage. "Sol Amendment" includes organic amendments, chemical additives and fertilizers. 3.07 PLANTER SOIL MIX A. Commercial brand soil mix, Kellog or approved equal. B. Install soil mix in raised planters and planter pots to elevations shown. Water jet compact in 8" lifts to settle the soil. - END OF SECTION - 9802-A February 1998 PRUNEYARD PLACE Campbell, CA Section 02950-1 14 TREES. SHRUBS, VINES, GROUND COVERS, AND ORNAMENTAL GRASSES PART 1 - GENERAL 1.01 RELATED DOCUMENTS The General Conditions. Supplementary Conditions and Division 1 apply to this Section. 1.02 SUMMARY A. Furnish all labor, materials and equipment to complete the Work of this Section. B. The Work of this Section includes, but is not limited to: 1. Coordinate delivery of plants 2. Planting of trees, shrubs and ground covers 3. Fertilizing 4. Mulching etaking 6. InsWlalion of erosion control materials 7. Pre -maintenance inspection 8. Plant warranty C. Related work specified elsewhere: I. Tree Protection: Section 01530 2. Irrigation: Section 02810 3. Soil Preparation, Soil Mixes and Finish Grading: Section 02920 4. Landscape Maintenance: Section 02970 1.03 REFERENCES A. "An Annotated Checklist of Woody Ornamental Plants of California, Oregon and Washington, (Number 4091) McClintock and Leiser. Division of Agricultural Sciences, University of California, 1979. B. "USA Standard for Nursery Stock'. 1986 Edition, American Association of Nurxrymen. C. "Standardized Plant Names". 1942 edition. American Joint Committee on Horticultural Nomenclature. 1.04 TESTS Landscape Architect reserves the right to take and analyze samples of materials for conformity to specifications at any time. Contractor shall furnish samples upon request by Landscape Architect. Rejected materials shall be immediately removed from the site at Contractor's expense. Cost of testing of materials not meeting specification shall be paid by Contractor. 9802-A PR �„ VEYARD PLACE February 1998 Campbell, CA Section 02950-2 TREES, SHRUBS, VINES, GROUND COVERS. AND ORNAMENTAL GRASSES 1.05 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS A A. Perform work in accordance with all applicable laws, codes and regulations required by authorities having jurisdiction over such work and provide for all inspections and permits mit required by : ederal, State and local authorities in furnishing, transporting and installing materials. P Certificates of Inspection required by law for transportation shall accompany invoice for each .� shipment of plants. File copies of certificates with Owner's Representative after acceptance of material. Inspection by Federal or State Governments at place of growth does not preclude rejection of plants at project site. 1.06 SELECTION, TAGGING AND ORDERING OF PLANT MATERIAL A. Contractor shall submit a detailed and complete identification of sources for all plant materials including names of nursery/grower, location, phone and contact person at preconstruction meeting. B. Plants shall be inspected and approved by the Landscape Architect at place of growth and upon .-, delivery for conformity to specifications. Such approval shall not impair the right of inspection and rejection during progress of the work. Submit written request for inspection of plant marerial at place of growth to Landscape Architect. Written request shall state the place of growth and quantity of plants to be inspected. Landscape Architect .reserves the right to refuse inspection at this time if, in his/her judgment, a sufficient quantity of plants is not available for inspection. C. Subsutution of plant materials will not he permitted. 1.07 SUBMITTALS A. Certificate of Purchase: The Contractor shall place an order for the required number of trees, shrubs and ground cover within 10 working days after he received notice of approval of the contract A copy of the order showing the number of plants ordered, from whom ordered and the anticipated date of delivery as verified by the supplier, shall be submitted to the Landscape Architect B. Furnish 6 copies of numufacturcr's literature or laboratory analytical data and samples for the following items: 1. Plant fertilizers 2. Mulch 3. Organic amendment C. All submittals shall be forwarded in single package to the Landscape Architect within 30 days of award of the Gereral Contract. 1.08 PROJECT CONDITIONS A. Furnish standard products in manufacturers standard containers bearing original labels showing quantity, analysis and name of manufacrarer. B. Sim products with protection from weather or other conditions which would damage or impair the effectiveness of the product. 9802-A PRUNEYARD PLACE February 1998 Campbell. CA w TREES, SHRUBS, VINES, GROUND COVERS, AND ORN Section 02950-3 AMENTAL GRASSES 1.041 9 APPROVAL Wherever the term Landscape .Mchitect inw ntmg,approval" or "approved" are used herein. they mean approval of 14 1.10 WORK SCHEDULE In general, the work shall proceed as rapidly as possible, consistent with normal seasonal 19 limitations for planting work. 1.11 PROTECTION OF EXISTING PLANTS TO REMAIN ~ A. Do not store materials or equipment, permit burning or - branches of any existing plant to remain except u actusll Operate or park equipment under the areas. y required for construction in those B- Provide barricades, fences or other bamers as necessary at the drip I+ne to protect existing Plants to remain from damage during construction. C. Notify Landscape Architect in any case where Contractor feels grading or other construction called (or by Central Documents may damage existing plants to remain. D. If existing plants to remain arc damaged during construction, Contractor shall replace such Plants with plants of the sane species and size w those damaged at no cost the Owner. Architect. mishall Determination of extent of damage and value of damaged plan shall rest solely with Landscape 1.12 CLEAN-UP Keep all areas of wort clean, new and orderly a all times. Keep all Planting and maintenance operations. Clean up and rempaved yeas clean during the entire worst area prior to beginning of landscape move all deleterious materials and debris from aintenance period to the s.tisfaction of the Owner's Representative. 1.13 WARRANTY PERIOD AND REPLACEMENTS A. Contractor shall warrant that all trees planted under this Contract will be healthy and in flourishing condition of active growth one year from date of Final Acceptance. B. Contractor shall warrant that all shrubs, groundcovers and vines planted under this Contract will be healthy and in flourishing condition of active growth six accc'Plarcemonths from date of final . C. Replace, without cost to Owner, and as soon as weather conditions permit, all dead plant and all plants not in a vigorous, thriving condition. as determined by the Owner's Representative during and at the end of Warranty Penod. Plants shall be free from of dead or dying branches �- and shall closely match adjacent specimens of the same species and shall be subject to all req-itements of this specification. D. Contractor shall na be held responsible for failures due 10 neglect by Owner, vandalism, etc., L• during Waranty Period. Report such conditions to Landscape Architect in writing. L 98M-A February 1998 PRUNEYARD PLACE Campbell, CA a Section 02950-4 TREES, SHRUBS, VINES, GROUND COVERS, AND ORNAMENTAL GRASSES PART 2 - PRODUCTS A 2.01 PLANT MATERIALS M A. Plants shall be nursery grown in accordance with good horticultural practices under climatic conditions similar to those of the project for at least two years. Unless specifically noted otherwise, all plants shall be exceptionally dense, symmetrical, tightly knit, so trained or favored in development and appearance as to be superior in form, number of branches, compactness and symmetry. B. Plants shall be sound, healthy and vigorous, well branched and densely foliated when in leaf. They shall be free of disease, insect pests, eggs, or larvae, and shall have healthy, well developed root systems. They shall be free from physical damage or adverse conditions that would prevent thriving growth. C. All trees shall be standard and matched in form unless noted otherwise. D. Plants shall be true to species and variety and shall conform to measurements specified except that plants larger thin specified may be used if approved by Landscape Architect. Plant caliper and height shall conform minimally to the USA Standard for Nursery Stock, 1986." Use of such plants shall not increase ConL-acl price. If larger plants are approved, the ball of earth shall be increased in proportion to I x size of the plant. Plants shall be measured when branches are in their norr.al position. Height and spread dimensions specified refer to main body of plant and not branch tip to tip. Caliper measurement shall be taken at a point on the trunk 6" above natural ground line for trees up to 4" in caliper and at a point 12" above the natural ground line for trees over 4" in caliper. If a range of size is given, no plant shall be less than the minimum size and not less than 40% of the plants shall be as large as the maximum size specified. The measurements specified are the minimum size acceptable and are the measurements after pruning, where pruning is required. Pants that meet the measurements specified, but do not possess a normal balance between height and spread shall be rejected. E. Container stock shall have grown in the containers, in which delivered for at least six months, but not over two years. Samples must prove no rootbound conditions exist. No container plants that have cracked or broken balls of earth when taken from container SWI be planted . All stock shall be well rooted in the container within which its grown. No circling, kinking, or girdling of roots will be allowed. F. Plants shall not be pruned before delivery. Trees which have damaged or crooked leaders, or multiple leaders, unless specified, will be rejected. Trees with abrasions of the bark, sunscalds, disfiguring knots, or fresh cuts of limbs over 3/4" which have not completely calloused, will be rejected. 2.02 PLANTING SOIL Planting soil for use in plant pits and plant containers shall be as specified in Section 02920, Soil Preparation and Soil Mixes. 2.03 MULCH Pine or fix bark, "walk-on" type, 1/2" to 1"diameter free of heart wood, sticks, din, and other debris, as approved. Material shall be nitrogen stsbiliaed. 2.04 STAKING MATERIALS A. Contractor shall use staking materials, necessary to meet requirements of specifications. subject to approval of Landscape Architect. 9802-A PRUNEYARD PLACE February 1998 Campbell, CA 1 Sec "on 02950-5 TREES. SHRUBS, VINES, GROUND COVERS, AND ORNAMENTAL GRA'_SES Materials: eI . Tree Stakes: 2" diameter minimum lodgepole pine with 10" tapered driving point and chamfered top; treated with an E.P.A. approved wood preservative. t 2. Ties: Corded rubber ties, or approved equal, color: black. 2.05 VINE SUFPORTS Stainless steel eyebolts or plastic eyelets, epoxy -fastening type, as approved and green plastic nursery tape (no win reinforced ties shall be used). �1 2.06 TREE SUMP DRAINS u Furnish and install: Perforated PVC drain pipe; filter fabric - Mirafi 140NS, or approved equal; and drain rock as indicated on the drawings. 2.07 ROOT CONTROL BARRIER 2' wide root control barrier, polypropylene or polyethylene continuous panels with locking devices; as supplied by Deep Root Corporation, Villa Landscape Products, or approved equal. Root barriers shall be installed where indicated on the drawings. C2.08 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER A. Top-dmss Fertilizer: Complete fertilizer, 50% of the nitrogen to be derived from natural organic sources or urea -form. Available phosphoric acid shall be from superphosphate, bone C m tankage. Potash shall be derived from muriate of potash containing 60% potash: 16% Nitrogen 6% Phosphoric Acid C 8% Potash B. Tree and Shrub Planting Fertilizer: Agriform 20-10-5 formula 21 gram tablet. C2.09 PRE -EMERGENCE WEED CONTROL In area of Woody Ornamental Plants: Use a site specific herbicide appropriate for local weed populaticn and compa0le with ornamental plants. Hand weeding is acceptable. Contractor shall assume responsibility for use of herbicides. 2.10 ANTI-DESSICANT Anti-dessicants for retarding excessive loss of plant moisture and inhibiting wilt shall be sprayable, water insoluble vinyl-viyledine complex which will produce a moisture retarding banner not removable by rain. Will -proof formula NCF as manufactured by Nursery Specialty Products, LGreenwich, Connecticut, or approved equal. C r 98W-A PRUNEYARD PLACE February 1998 Campbell, CA A Section 02950-6 go TREES, SHRUBS, VINES, GROUND COVERS, AND ORNAMENTAL GRASSES PART 3 - EXECUTION N 3.01 HANDLING OF PLANT MATERIALS A. Arrange for pick-up or delivery of pre -purchased plant materials. B. Canned stock shall be removed carefully after cans have been cut on two sides with approved cutter. Do not use spade to cut cans. Do not lift or handle container plants by tops, stems, or n trunks at any time. C. At Contractor's option, spt ey all evergreen or deciduous plant material in full leaf immediately before transporting with anti-dessicant, applying an adequate film over wnks, branches twigs, and foliage. 3.02 LAYOUT AND EXCAVATION OF PLANTING AREAS A. Shrubs and gmundcovers to be a minimum clearance of 15" away from header boards, lawn edges and pavings, a measured from center of plant material, or a located by Landscape Architect. B. Layout plants at locations shown on drawings. Use 3' lath color -coded for each species of plant material. Stake each tree and major shrub and outline shrub and ground cover beds with lime Landscape Architect will check location of plants in the field and shall adjust to exact position before planting begins. Landscape Architect reserves right to refuse inspection if, in his o inion, an insufficient quantity of plants is available for layout check. C. Excavate container grown tree, shrub, and vine pits to the following dimensions: 1 E :CAVAT1ON WIDTH DEPTH 15 gallon can trees and Bax or can + 30" Box or can + scarify 24" box trees bottom of hole Canned shrubs, Can + 12" Can + scarify bottom of oroamenW grasses hole and vines The use of soil augers is not pe—tted. 3.03 DRAINAGE, DETRIMENTAL SOILS, OBSTRUCTIONS A. Notify Landscape Architect in writing of all soil or drainage conditions Contractor considers detrimental to growth of plant material. State conditions and submit proposal for correcting condition. B. Test drainage of plant beds and pits by filling with water twice in succession. Conditions permitting the retention of water in planting beds for more than twenty-four (24) hours shall be brought to the anention of Landscape Architect. The contractor shall bore drainage holes as per detail when instructed by the Landscape Archilect. Submit in writing a proposal for the co ectior to Owner's Representative for approval before proceeding with work. C. If rock, underground constructicn work, tree routs or other obstructions are encountered in the excavation of plant pits, alwmate locations may be selected by Owner's Representative. Where locations cannot be changed, submit cost required to remove the obstructions to a depth of not ten than 6 inches (6") below the requtred pit depth. Proceed with work after approval of Owner's Representative. 9802-A PRUNEYARD PLACE Februan 1998 Campbell, CA n Section 02950-7 TREES, SHRUBS, VINES, GROUND COVERS, AND ORNAMENTAL GRASSES 3.04 PLANTING OPERATIONS A. Protect plants at all times from sun or drying words. Plants that cannot be planted immediately on delivery shall be kept in the shade, well protected and well watered. PR B. Remove all burlap and wire baskets, remove nursery leader stake. C. After removing plant from container, scarify side of rootball to prevent rootbound condition. •1 D. Packtill plant pits as per Section 02920. Set plant plumb and brie rigidly in position until planting soil has been tamped solidly around the ball and roots. When plant pits have been backfilled approximately 2/3 full, water thoroughly, saturating rootball, before installing remainder of the planting soil to top of pit, eliminating all air pockets. E. Place tree, shrub and ornamental grass planting fertilimr evenly distributed in plant pits when ' WidJ lled 2/3 full according to the following schedule: 1 gallon can - 1 tablet 5 gallon can - 3 tablets 15 g%t'in can - 6 tabl s other I tablet per 112 in. caliper or I foot of height, whichever is less F. Smooth planting area to conform to specific grades aftc• full settlement has occurred. G. Form saucer with 4" high berrn around tree nts .:(edge of rootball. Do not form saucer in lawn area. H. Water all plants immediately after planu,.e. 1. Remove all nursery type plant labels from plants. 3.05 MULCHING A. Mulch all pits and beds with a 2" layer of'.pectfted mulch, except in lawn seas. B. Install 4' diameter mulch rings around trees in lawn areas. Place a 2" layer of mulch in ring and keep clear of gnus and weeds. Keep mulch 6" clear of trunk crown. 3.06 STAKING A. Staking shall be completed immediately after planting. Plants shall stand plumb after staking. I . Lowe stakes to rlign with prevailing winds and the nearest hardscape geometry. Stake as close to the main trunk as is practical outside of rootball. Stakes shall be driven at least 18" into firm ground. 2. All stakes shall be plumb, and pored stakes shall have the same top elevation. 3. Tie tree to stakes using approved tree err on the lowest point necessary to hold tree upright. Nail ru%cr tie to stake using two roofing nails at each end of tie. Cut off stake after installation six inches above upper tie and at least 4 inches below lowest pern. wet branches. 3.07 VINE SUPPORTS Tie vines to fences or supports as indicated in drawings. 98,32-A PRUNEYARD PLACE February 1998 Campbell, CA A c Section 02950-8 TREES, SHRUBS, VINES, GROUND COVERS, AND ORNAMENTAL GRASSES 3.09 SUMP DRAINS w Instal sump drains and lateral subdrain lines as shown on drawings. 3.09 ROOT BARRIERS A Instal root barriers as shown on the Drawings and in accordance with manufacturer's specifications. n 3.10 PRUNING Prune plants only at ume of planung and according to standard horticultural practice to preserve the • natural character or the plant. Pruning to be pane under supervision of Landscape Architect. Remove all dead wood, suckers and broken or badly bruised branches. Use only clean, sharp tools. 3.11 GROUND COVER PLANTING A. Prepare soil bed as per Section 02920 and plant ground cover plants at optimum depth for proper growth. Avoid air pockets. B. Apply top -dress fertilizer at the rate of S lbs. per 1,000 square fee.. Water bed thoroughly after fertilizer application. Wash all fertilizer from leaves of plant materials. 3.12 WATERING All plantings shall be watered immediately after planting. After the fast watering, water shall be applied to all plants as conditions may require to keep die plants in a healthy and vigorous growing condition until completion of the Contract. Use soil probes to insure the rootball (especially of boxed trees) and backfill are neither too wet nor too dry. 3.13 MAINThNANCE OF PLANTING From the time any plants are planted until final acceptance of landscape installation, the Contractor shall ensure that al: plants be watered and fertilized, sash and dews kept removed, weeds controlled, and plant replacements made. 3.14 PREMAINTENANCE INSPECTION A. At the completion of all landscape, p1m.ang and irrigation work under this Contract, and before the beginning of the formal maintenance period, the Premaintenance inspection shall be performed. Requirements of the landscape maintenance period are specified in Section 02970. Landscape Maintenance. B. The Contractor shall request the inspection in writing 1^ •k Landscape Architect seven days before the cwnpletion of work in order that a mutual'- xable time for inspection troy be arranged C. The Contractor and such others as the Landscape Architect requests, shall be present at the inspection. D. At the time of Premaintenance inspection, the Contractor shall have all planting areas, under this Contract, free of weeds and neatly cultivates. All plant basins shall be in good repair. E. If, after the inspection, the Landscape Architect is of the opinion that all work has been performed as per the drawings and specifications and that all plant materials ant in satisfactory growing condition, he will give the Contractor wnnen notices of acceptance and commencement of the formal maintenance period. �. 9802-A PRUNEYARD PLACE February 1999 Campbell, CA r Ice Section 02950-9 TREES, SHRUBS, VINES, GROUND COVERS, AND ORNAMENTAL GRASSES F. Work requiring corrective action in the judgment of the Landscape Architect shall be performed q within ten days after the Premaintenance inspection. Corrective work and materials replacement shall be in accordance with the drawings and specifications and shall be made by the Contractor at no cost to the Owner. ■ G. No partial approvals will be given. I - END OF SECTION - I 1 e 98M-A PRUNEYARD PLACE February 1999 Campbell, CA aM ' Section 02970 1 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE PART 1 • GENERAL 1 1,01 RELATED DOCUMENTS The General Conditions. Supplementary Conditions and Division I apply to this Section. ' 1.02 SUMMARY A. Furnish all labor, materials and equipment to complete the Work of this Section. Work includes but is not necessarily limited to services required to maintain the landscape in an attractive condition as ' specified herein for a period of 90 calendar days B The Work of this Section includes, but is not limited to: 1. Irrigation Systems: Section 02810 2. Soil Preparation, Soil Mixes and Finish Grading: Section 02920 3. Trees. Shrubs. Vines and Ground Cover: Section 02950 1.03 QUALITY ASSURANCE r A. Work Force: Contractors mpesemative should be experienced in landscape maintenance. and preferably should have an education in ornamental horticulture. B. Materials: All materials used shall either conform to bid specifications or shall otherwise be acceptable to the Landscape Architect. The Landscape Architect shall be given a monthly record of all herbicides. insecticides and disease :ontrol chemicals used. I1.04 MAINTENANCE PERIOD The Maintenance period shall be 90 calendar days from written notice of the completion of the nd I Premaintenance inspection, The Contractor shall continuously maintain all areas involved in this Contract during the progress of the work and during the maintenance period until final acceptance of the work by the Owner. Improper I maintenance or possible poor condition of any planting at the termination of the v:heduled maintenance perod may cause postponement of the final completion date of the Contract. Maintenance shall be continued by the Contractor until all work is acceptable. In order to carry out the plant maintenance wok, the Contractor shall furnish sufficient men and adequate equipment to perform the wok during the maintenance period. Maintenance period shall not start until all elements of construction, planung, and irrigation for the entire project are in accordance with Drawings and the Specifications. the Contractor shall request an inspection to begin the maintenance period after all planting and related work her been completed in accordance with the Conuut dmtimenu. A prime requirement is that all lawn and ground cover areas shall have been planted and the lawn areas shall show an even, healthy stand of turf which shall have been mowed twice. If such criteria arc met to the satisfaction of the Landscape ArchuteM a field notification will be issued to the Contractor to establish the effective beginning date of the maintenance period. Any day ntain planungs, replace unsuitable plants or do weed control or when 1m Contractor tails to adequately mai other work. as determined necessary by the Landscape Architect. will not be credited as one of the maintenance period working days. The Contractor's maintenance period will he extended if the provisions required within the Drawings and specifications are not filled. Project will not be segmented into rrtaintenance phases. 99M-A February 1999 PRUNEYARD PLACE Campbell, CA Section 02970-2 LANDSCAPE MAIN-IENANCE 1.05 WARRANTY AND REPLACEMENT AA. Guarantee: All plant materials installed under the contract shall be guaranteed against any and all poor, u inadequate or inferior materials and/or workmanship for a period of o.:e year. Any plant found to be dead or in poor condition due to faulty materials or workmanship, as determined by the Landscape Architect, shall be replaced by the Contractor at his expense. B. Replacement: Any materials found to be dead, missing or in poor condition during the maintenance period shall be replaced immediately. The Landscape Architect shall be the sole judge as to the ar condition of material. Material to be replaced within dte --ay period shall be replaced by the Contractor within 15 days of written notification by th•. Owner C. Any delay in completion of planting operations which extends the planting into more dun one planting season shall extend the Warranty Period correspondingly. D. Contractor shall not be held responsible for failure due to neglect by Owner, vandalism, etc. during Warranty Period. Report such conditions to Landscape Architect in writing. 1.06 INSPECTIONS Normal progress inspection shall be rNucsted by the Contractor from the Landscape Architect a, last 48 hours in advance of an anticipated inspection. Inspections arc as follows: 1. Immediately prior to the commencement of the work on this section. 2. Completion of the 90 day maintenance period prior to final acceptance. 1.07 RECORD DRAWINGS Prior to the date of the final inspection, the Contractor shall acquire from the Landscape Architect approved reproduciFe prints and finally record from the job a record set of all changes made during construs Lion. Label said prints "Record Drawings", and deliver to the Landscape Architect the "Landscape and Inigation Warranty" as required. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.01 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER Top dress fertilizes Complete fertilizer, 50% of the nitrogen to be derived from nattu al organic sources or urea -form. Available phosphoric acid shall be from superphosphate, bone or tankage. Potash shall be derived from muriate of potash containing 60% potash. 16% Nitrogen 6% Phosphoric Acid 8% Potash PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.01 MAINTENANCE Maintenance shall be according to the following standards. All areas shall be weeded and cultivated at intervals of not more than 10 days. Watering, mowing, rolling, edging, trimming, fenilrzation, spraying and pest control, as, may be required, shall be included in the mainG nancr ; enod. Street gutters shall be include ; within the debns/silution removal program. The Contractor shill be responsible for maintaining adequate protection of the area Damaged areas dull be repaired at the Contractor's expense. Between the 15th . of z-.d the 20th day ofthe main —,trice period, the Contractor shall resod and/or reseed all spots or yeas within the lawn where normal turf growth is not evident. 99W-A PRUNEYARD PLACE February 1998 Campbell. CA Section 02970-3 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 3.02 TREE AND SHRUB CARE. w A. Watering: Maintain a water basin around plants so that enough water can be applied to establish moil tie through the major root zone. When hand -watering, use a water wand to break the water force. Maintain mulches to reduce evaporation and frequency of watering. Use a soil probe to insure rootballs and backfrlls are neither loo dry not too wet. B. Pruning L Tres: a. Prune trees to select and develop permanent scaffold branches that are smaller in diameter than the trunk or branch to which they are attached and which have a vertical spacing of from IS" to 48" and radial orientation so as not to overlay one another: to eliminate diseased m damaged growth; to eliminate narrow V-shaped branch forks that lack strength; to reduce toppling and wind damage by thinning out crowns; to maintain growth within space limitations; to maintain a natural appearance; to balance cmwn with rests. b. Under no circumstances will stnpping of lower branches Craising up") of young trees be permitted. Lower branches shall be retained in a "tipped -back" or pinched condition with as much foliage as possible to promote caliper trunk growth (tapered trunk). Lower branches can be cut flush with the trunk only after tree is able to stand erect without staking or other support. c. Evergreen trees shall be thinned out and shaped when necessary to prevent wind and storm damage. The primary pruning of deciduous trees shall be done during the dormant season. Damaged trees or those that constitute health or safety `wards shall be pruned at any time of the year as required. 2. Shrubs: a. The objectives of shrub pruning are the same as for trees. Shrubs shall not be clipped into balled or boxed forms unless such is required by design. b. All pruning cuts shall be made to lateral branches or buds and all cuts made just at the bark collar. "Stubbing" will not be permitted. C. Staking: Stakes shall remain in place through acceptance and are to he inspected to prevent girdling of trunks or branches and to prevent rubbing that causes bark wounds. D. Weed Control: Keep basins and areas between plants free of weeds. Use a site specific herbicide appropriate for local weed population and compatible with ornamental plants. Hand weeding is acceptable. Contractor shall assume responsibility for use of herbicides. Avoid frequent soil cultivation that destroys shallow roots. Use mulches to help prevent weed seed germination. E. Insect and Disease Control: Maintain a reasonable control with approved materials F. Fertilization I Fertilize all planting areas with the following: a. Commencement of maintenance penal - 5 lbs./1.000 sq. Itwith top -dress fertilizer. b. At the end of the maintenance period and at 30-day intervals should mam.er:ance period be extended - 3 Ibs11,000 sq.ft. with above mentioned fertilizer mix referenced under 2,01. 2. Avoid applying fertilizer to the base of main stem; rather, spread evenly over root zone or enure planting area. 9802-A February 1998 PRUNEYARD PLi —E Campbell, CA A Section 02970-4 . LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE w G. Replacement of Plants: Replace dead, dying and missing plants with plants of a size, condition and variety acceptable to Owner at Contractor's expense. 3.03 IRRIGATION SYSTEM R A. System Inspection: Contractor shall check all systems for proper operation. Lateral lines shall be flushed out after removing the last sprinkler head or two at each end of the lateral. All heads are to be adjusted as necessary for unimpeded coverage. B. Controllers: Set and program automatic controllers for seasonal water requirements. Cive Owner's representative a key to controllers and instructions on how to turn off system in case of emergency. ^. C. Repairs: Repair ail damages to irrigation system at Contractor's expense. Repairs shall be made within one watering period so as not to miss any scheduled irrigation. 3.04 EROSION REPAIR A. Repair eroded area as necessary. Restore flush to adjacent finish grade. Reset any affected plants and restore mulch. B. Bring erosion damage to the immediate attention of the Landscape Architect. Protect damaged area with temporary measures such as sand -bagging or silt fence until permanent solution is implemented. Prevent additional cutting and eroding, as necessary. 3.05 FINAL INSPECTION A. At the completion of the formal maintenance period, the final inspection shall be performed. B. The Contractor shall send a written request for inspection to the Landscape Architect 10 working days before the completion of work in order that a mutually agreeable time for insrection may be arranged. C. The Contractor, Owner, and such others as the Landscape Architect directs, shall be present at the inspection. D. If, after the inspection, the Landscape Architect is of the opinion that all work has been performed as per the Drawings and Specifications, and that all plant materials are in satisfactory growing condition and the irrigation system is in operating order, w iten notice of Final Acceptance and end of the formal maintenance period will be given. E. Work requiring corrective action or replacement in the judgment of the Landscape Architect shall be performed within 10 days after the final inspection. Corrective work and materials replacement shall be in accordance with the drawings and specifications, shall be made by the Contractor at no cost to the Owners, and shall be subject to the approval of the Owner or their representative. The maintenance period sha11 be extended until final approval. -END OF SECTION- 9802-A PRUNEYARD PLACE February 1998 Campbell, CA 101 on DAVID J. POWER"S ®®a Febt Mary 6, 1998 Gloria Sciara City of Campbell Community Development Department I? j r� u 70 North First Street d Campbell, CA 95008 3 0 1gQ8 Dear Gloria: CITY OF C� APtrEIL PLANNING DEPL RE: Pruneyard Mitigation The purpose of this letter is to clarify cultural resource issues related to the Pruneyard Place project. I understand there has been some confusion over the type of monitoring required for cultural resources impacts per page 41 of the Expanded Initial Study (xe attached) that we prepared for the Pruneyard Place project. I just Hunted to let you know I have talked with Colin Busby with Basin Research and reviewed their proposed scope of services dated February 2, 1998. Based on Basin's expertise, I feel that the level of monitoring that they are proposing meets the intent of CEQA and is acceptable for this project. Let me know if you have additional concerns or need additional information. I hope everything is going well! Sincerely. /� Kathy Kovar Project M-iniSer c: Kheay Loke, William Wilson & Associates Colin Busby, Basin Research Associates F—i-n—ul 1'on.ullynl. & PIN -- INNS II.- Alanx•de • Sum• 204 • San 1—. 1 NY S1 _'h • Irl. 40% 248 V41(1 • Faw: 4IIN-24N Wwt 1 oF•c,tp - � "ice 4 February 3. 1998 CITY of CAMPBELL Z Ponce Department Ann Nelson ` William Wilson & Associates l 1999 S. Bascom Avenue Campbell. CA 95008 Dear Ann: Thank you for speaking with me regarding security deployment at the Pruneyard. As we discussed, it is probably time that the Pruneyard should increase their security staffing on Thursday's, Wredares,and seeing full parking Because the center has become extremely pop lots and full bars and restaurants. This has brought a variety of issues that would be chara istic with a small city (the City of Pruneyard). We see everything from domestic violence, drunk driving, traffic collisions. thefts, disturbances, and other crowd -related issues. In order to keep the Pruneyard a safe place and continue to keep a viable customer base, it is important that you and I both share in protecting these customers. Therefore, I recommend that you double the guards that are on foot during these peak days, and, specifically, station them at the problem areas near (1) the handicapped stalls by Hollywood Video, (2) Guido's, (3) Rock Bottom Brewery, (4) The Albuquerque during these peak hours. mOrrback, and ked security)vehicletshould be deployed topat patrol parking lotsandshould be well -lighted for anyone to see. our efforts together will make the Pruneyard a safer place. One final rcomment- -we have started referring complaints regarding handicapped parking Y our secut try personnel. Thanks, again. 1 % J Sincerely, 1 t—� David L. Gul% Chief of Police nelson/dlg/cim \ 70 North First S(rect Campbell, Gldorttu Y5O0B i497 tn. 408 366 2121 rlx 408 179.7561 tiw 108 866 2790 January 29. 1998 CITY of CAMPBELL Public Works Department Mr. David Word P^•rcyard Associates, LLC 1,-9 S. Bascom Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 RE: Pruneyard Office Tower and Parking Garage Deveiopment (S 97-20ISDP 97-01) Dear David: I have reviewed the Conditions of Approval for the above referent w1 project as they apply to the requirement that Pruneyard Associates, LLC enter into a Street Improvement Agreement (SIA) with the City fix the extension of Campisi Way. I have also consulted with the City Manager, City Attorney and Community Development Director regarding the City's understanding regarding the timing for approval of the SIA by the City Council. It is the City's understanding that approval of the SIA by the City Council shouki be considered a condition precedr.0 to the issuance of building permits for your project, as is the case for most of the major conditions of approval. 1 anticipate having a draft Street Improvement Agreement available for your review by February 13, 1998, prior to your departure for your planned vacation the week of February 16 though 20, 1998. Should we be able to complete negotiations on the SIA by Friday, March 6. 1998. approval of the agreement could be scheduled for the Marc'u 17, 1998 regular City Council meeting. As approval of an interim parking plan by the City Council is also a condition precedent a, issuance of huddling permits by the City, it would be desirable to proceed to the City Council with both the SIA and the parking plan concurrently. In order for staff to have adequate time to review your parking plan and mat Council agenda preparation deadlines, it is recommended that you so'.mit your parking plan to the City by Friday, February 20, 1998. You may wish to disci, — sc::edule in more detail with the Community Development Department. 1 will be out of the office on Thursday, January 29 and Frklay. January 30, but can be leached through my Secretary, Marlene Pomeroy, if necessary. Otherwise, 1 will give you a call on Monday. February 2 to answer any questions that you might have. Sincerely f Robert Kass Public Works Director cc: Bernard M. Stroiny Steve Piasecki Bill Seligmann 70 North First Street Campbell, Calitnrnu a50o5 1421 tit 408 866 1150 rAr 408 376.0958 Too 400. 666.12790 MEMORANDUM CITY OF CAMPBELL TO: Gloria Sciara, Planner 1I Y ' DATE: January 21, 3.998 cc. Bob Kass, Public Works Director ccM rlene Pomeroy, Secretary FROM: Jan ems ley De ty City Clerk SUBJECT: 1999 S. Bascom - Application of Mr. David Word on behalf of Pruneyard Associates At the regular meeting of January 20, 1998. the City Council gave second reading to Ordinance 1955 approving a Special Development Permit ISDP 97-01) and Site and Architectural Approval IS 97-20) to allow the construction of a six -story, 130,000 square foot office building and a four -level parking garage on property located at 1999 s. Bascom Avenue in a C-2-0 (General Commercial/Overlay) Zoning District. Please find certified copy of this Ordinance attached for your records. JAN 13 ;?^g C'TY OF PW4NINpjG DEL EPT.' 1999 S. BASCOM AVE. S 97-20/UP 97-11 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLAN. 4 OF 7 08/2000 PRUNEYARD ol PLACE c..r...i. C.lo Ryt... 1 Off.... C..p►.11, CA 'fir ��. — — —. -- — "" .r..• a WILLIAM WILSON \ A;�\ I I i �f/ I � t . GWc.le! •. a�� I,wssfxuns 4.luv�•- \ ` �,yC GO.Gli-! i ��- / I I . ' I i \ � .•�� yr rw � `•2 S • r' •••V• r�r rr -~-a.cn-e a Y . i I jK+ o co....! ! � ate— I 0 00.0.- a '—'� i i '�-•o'eo,o.! . �.� , IL WAL L SECTIONS 4 PART A -,,L N �-`T_RiGR WALL-CT.ONW ALL �CT:ON /2 - R A sVA 10N (1 'iTC R-R W ' Sa CTION ` A9.04 f PRUNEYARD -� PLACE r � - RgNul 011lsn C6gM11, CA R 11 I U LI WI{.WN MASON • ASSOCIATSS G Ih PASTA T RR • ) PAST A !AT + I Ai Ic= 0PARTjAL TOWER TWO PL4N A PARTIA c T N EXTERIOR 2 CANOPY PLANS O EXISTG BLDGS. AB.05 1 '- Existing Tree Legend,—. ,.. n. h• rrw rr.e o,� rr Key sssrur pwual SUe Plan @ Offia Tbwm Ll PRUNEYARI '- Offl— C—pboll, CA Vt�.,.` �.PLACE AASOCIATU Section A -A Section B-B IK�1'-P IM�1'I • 1 1 o Mc— rmr I — 15 - Circulation Link @ office lbw 3� llr� L i b �YSY n.rr.� rbri� -- L2 1 PRUNEYARD PLACE C........ C." ty...I off— WILLIAM WILSON • ASSOCIATES r1 r �� 1 sue'• "In �a ♦"�' • Nbrsldl'7nc ^^UNEYARD INN RENDERING AD D: PRUNEYARD PLACE C..,.."* C, I WILLIAM WILSON & ASSOCIATES . td n n n OVERALL SITE PLAN Al 01 1999 S. BASCOM AVE. S 97-20/UP 97-11 4 OF 9 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLAN. 12/99 OF 1 �Mp Je CITY OF CAMPBELL City Clerk's Office January 21, 1998 Mr. David Word Pruneyard lssocia':es 1999 South Basco, Avenue Suite 200 Camp`,ell, CA 95008 Dear Mr. Nord: At the regular meeting of January 20, 1998, the City Council gave second reading to Ordinance 1955 approving a Special Development Permit (SDP 97-01) and Site and Architectural Approval 1597-20) to allow, the construction of a six -story, 130,OCO square foot office building and a four -level parking garage on property located at 1999 S. Bascom Avenue in a C-2-0 (General Commercial/Overlay) Zoning District, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. Please find certified copy of this Ordinance enclosed for your records. Please do not hesitate to contact this office (866-2117) or Gloria Sciara, Community Development Department, should you have any quesLions in regard to the City Council's action. Sincerely, Anne Bybee City Clerk Eric cti.:;. ____ Community Development Dept. Vol Kau, Public Works Department 70 North Fint Street Campbell, California 95008, 1413 1rL 408.966,2117 - FAX 408.374 6889 7DD 408.666.2790 ORDINANCE NO. t955 BEING AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL APPROVING A SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (SDP 97-01) AND SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL (S 97-20) TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SIX - STORY, 130,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING AND A FOUR - LEVEL PARKING GARAGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1999 S. BASCOM AVENUE IN A C-2-0 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL/OVERLAY) ZONING DISTRICT. APPLICATION OF MR. DAVID WORD, ON BEHALF OF PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES, LLC. FILE NO. SDP 97-Ol/S 97-20. After notification and public hearing, as specified by law, and after presentation by the Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed. After due consideration of all evidence presented, the City Council finds as follows with respect to application SDP 97-01 IS 97-20: I. A Special 7evelopment Permit and Site and Architectural Permit proposes the construction of one 130,000 gross square fool, six -story office building, and a four level parking garage containing 730 parking spaces on the western side of the project site. 2. The proposed development applications, as conditioned, are consistent ith the General Plan and Zoning designations which indicate commercial land uses for this property. 3. The proposed landscape plan and site amenities will improve the appearance of the propos A project. 4- The proposed parking and circulation modifications, with the recommended conditions of approval, improves the general on -site circulation of the site. 5. Under the direction of the City of Campbell, an Expanded Initial Study was prepared by David J. Powers and Associates, Inc. for the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. 6. No substantial evidence has been presented which shows that the project, subject to implementation of mitigation measures identified in the Expanded Initial Study, will have a significant adverse environmental impact. 7. The traffic study prepared by Linscon, Law & Greenspan demonstrateb that the proposed shared parking concept is sufficient to support the proposed development and the existing uses on the property. City Council Ordinance No SDP 97-01 /S 97-20 - 1999 S. Bascom Avenue - Pruneyard Paee 2 8. The traffic study prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan indicates that the proposed office development will generate 1,711 vehicle trips per day during weekdays. 9. The existing development on the property consists of movie theaters, retail, office, and hotel uses. The proposed development is consistent with the existing uses on the propel ty with adjacent land uses, subject to the conditions of approval. 10. The Circulation Element of the Campbell General Plan identifies the extension of Campisi Way as an improvement to the City's circulation system. 11. The purpose of the Campisi Extension is to provide direct access to the Pruneyard by allowing traffic from Highway 17 and Hamilton Avenue west of Highway 17 to bypass Bascom Avenue. 12. The Campisi Extension is identified in the Circulation Element as a necessary circulation improvement to the Hamilton and Bascom commercial district area. 13. City traffic engineering estimates conclude that the extension of Campisi Way will result in the following: • Eliminates 252 northF•ound left turns at the Hamilton/Bascom intersection dur'ng the PM peak hour. • Reduces the PM peak hour delays at the Hamilton/Bascom intersection eight seconds below existing conditions. • Approximately 5,860 vehicles per day generated by the P�aneyard would use the extension. • Traffic utilizing the extension would almost exclusively have an origin or destination at the Pruneyard. • Reduces travel time to and from the Pruneyard and both Highway 17 and Hamilton Avenue west of Highway 17. • Increases the amount of unused capacity at the Hamilton/Bascom intersection. • Has a positive impact on congestion in the vicinity of the Pruneyard. • Would off -set the project's traffic impacts that travel between the Pruneyard and both Highway 17 and locations on Hamilton Avenue west of Highway 17. 14. The developer will be required to contribute a $600,000 share of the private costs of construction to extend Campisi Way as a condition of approval. There is a reasonable relationship between the amount of the contribution and the cost of the Campisi Way extension in that the project site would be the primary beneficiary of the extension. City Council Ordinance No.__ SDP 97-01/S 97-20 - 1999 S. Bascom Avenue Pruneyard 15. The costs of construction to extend Campisi Way include design/engineering, land acquisition, severance costs, construction, and demolition of structures at the Aloha Apartments necessary to accommodate the roadway. 16. The contribution of $600.000 for a share of the costs to construct the extension of Campisi Way to the Pruncyard property is roughly proportional and reasonably related to the project's impacts. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the contribution and the type of development project being proposes, in that the extension of Campisi Way would off -se; the traffic impacts identified for this type of project. There is a reasonable relationship between the need for the Campisi Way extension and the type of development being proposed in that the project will generate 1,711 vehicle trips per day during weekdays which would impact already congested City streets and Campisi Way would mitigate this impact. 17 Subsequent developments in the Hamilton and Bascom commercial district w;l be required to share in the costs of constructing the Campis' Way extension if the projects generate traffic that would pass through the Hamilton/Bascom intersection. 18. The proposed light green paint color on the roof on the elevator tower of the parking garage and on the roof screen of the new office tower is not compatible with the building colors of the proposed office tower. 19 The conditions of approval require details and revisions to some of the proposed building materials and paint colors so that they are architecturally compatible with the existing and proposed development. 20. The proposed parking garage is highly visible from Highway 17. 21 The proximity of the garage to the western property line does not allow the installation of sufficient landscaping to adegr:ately screen the parking garage from Highway 17. 22. Existing off -site landscaping ithin the Caltrans right-of-way adjacent to the western property line i< not sufficient to screen the proposed parking garage or the property from Highway :7. 23. The conditions of approval require supplemental off -site landscaping of 24" box Redwood trees in the adjacent Caltrans righr-of-way to adequately screen the parking garage from Highway 17. City Council Ordinance No. -- SDP 47-0! /S 97-20 - 1995 S. Bascom Avenue Pruneyard 24. The proposed location of the parking garage necessitate the relocation of access to the Los Gatos Creek Trail access from the Pruneyard. 25. The proposed relocation of the Los Gatos Creek Trail access indicated on the site plans on the west side of the parking garage blocks visibility of he access and may compromise safety of pedestrians using the facility. Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the City Council further find and concludes that: I. The proposed project, with conditions of approval, is consistent with the policies of the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance in effect at the time of the application submittal and is consistent with uses in the immediate area. I itr piops:d prui::: ", i" aid in the enhancement and the harmonious development of the immediate area. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, peace, morals, comfort or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use. 3. The proposed use will not be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the City and its residents. 4. The proposed project with the conditions imposed, will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for the project. 5. The proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use and site improvements. 6. These conditions are required as related and proportional to the impacts of the project The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that hc!she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the ordinance of the City of Campbell and the State of California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this development and are not herein specified. City Council Ordinance No. SUP 1,7-01'S 97-20 - 1999 S. Bascom Avenue - Pruneyard Page 5 -- l . Project Approval Approval is granted for a Special Development Permit (SDP 97-01) and Site and Architectural Review Permit (S 97-20) allowing development on property located at 1999 S. Bascom Avenue consisting of the following: • A six story, 130,000 gross square foot office building and; • A four level parking garage containing 730 parking spaces; Project approval shall substantially comply with project plans prepared by Homberger and Worstell. Inc. stamp dated 10/30/97, except as modified by the Conditions of Approval contained herein. Revised Office Building Elevations A. Building Matenals 4pplicant shall continue to work with staff on resolving the design of the roc, screen (e!iminate angled design) or integrate similar roof screens on the two ex;s�,ng office buildings to provide consistency with the architectural design of the existing office development. The Exterior facade detail of the roof enclosure shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of building permits for the office structure. B Garage Materials and Colors Applicant shall work with staff to select appropriate building color` for the parking garage, the roof of tower and alternative material for the elevator tower roof that is architecturally compatible with the existing developments on the subject property. The roof materials a id colors of the parking garage shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of building permits. 3 Asproved Mat-rials/Treatment Applicant shall submit final sample materials indicating pedestrian level details, hardscape, mesh screening for the parking garage, and samples of actual finishes and colors that will be utilized on all new buildings, walkways, and courtyard areas shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of building permits. 4 Architgoural Details: Applicant shall submit a site plan and illustrated brochures indicating the location and design of architectural features such as outdoor furniture, bicycle parking facilities, and non -fixed landscape planters chat will be utilized in the new building areas for approval by the Community Development Director. 5. Final Site Plan_ Applicant shall submit a final site plan indicating circulation and parking modifications for review and subject to approval by the Community Development Director and the Public Works Director for substantial compliance with approved plans prior to issuance of building permits. Citv Council Ordinance No. SDP 97-01 /S 97-20 - 1999 S. Bascom Avenue - Pruneyard Page 6 6. Development Schedule: Constructinn of the office tower, parking garage and hotel expansion shall commence within one year from the date of project approval and shall be completed within one year following the commencement of construction. 7. Parking and Driveways: All parking and driveway areas shall be developed in Cora gliance — ith the approval and plans and Chapter 21.50 (Parking and Loading) of the Campbt;l Municipal Code subject to review by the Community Development Director. 'i. On -site Lighting: On -site lighting shall be shielded away from adjacent properties and directed on site. Details of project lighting shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 9. Landscape Plan Applicant shall submit four (4) sets of the trial landscaping plan indicating the type and size of plant material including on -site trees, planting details and irrigation system to the Community Devclopment Director for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The plan shall include the number of trees proposed for removal or relocation due to construction, or circulation improvements. Any trees subject to removal or relocation shall be identified by size, type, number and species. 10. Tree Protection: A tree protection plan prepared by a licensed arborist shall be submitted to the Planning Division providing tree protection measures during all phases of demolition, resurfacing, or construction. All trees damaged during construction shall be replaced with three trees for every one removed. The size of replacement trees shall be 24 inch box. 11. Off -site Landscaping: The applicant shall submit landscaping plans indicating installation of 24-inch box Redwood trees and irrigation along the Caltrans right-of-way adjacent to the western property line to supplement existing landscaping in order to screen the site from view from Highway 17. The plan shall be submitted to the Campbell Community Development Director for approval prior to submittal to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The planting of trees shall be spaced consistent with the spacing of trees along the Highway 17 right-of-way northern of Hamilton Avenue. All necessary approvals and permits for landscaping on land located in the Caltrans right-of-way must be obtained at the expense of the applicant from the California Department of Transportation. The submittal of the off -site landscape plans shall be coordinated by the Campbell Community Development Department. The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the trees for the first five years following their installation. City Council Ordinance No. SDP 97-Ol/S 97-20 - 1999 S. Bascom Avenue - Pruneyard Pace 7 12. Stgnaage Proeram: No signage is approved as part of the development applications approved herein (SDP 97-01, S 97-20, UP 97-I1). The applicant shall submit a sign program indicating all new signs for the site which are intended for the advertisement of uses within the site. No sign shall be installed until su, h application is approved and a permit issued by the Community Development Department, Planning Commission or City Council as specified in Section 21.53. of the Zoning Ordinance (Sign Ordinance). 13. Freeway Sins: All new or refaced freeway oriented signs require approval from the City Council. 14. Construction Mitigation Measures The applicant shall implement mitigation measures as specified in the Expanded Initial Study dated 10/22/97 (pages 39-40) prepared by David 1. Powers and Associates. Inc. including the following: 1. Construction activities will be limited to daytime hours of 8:00 am to 5:00 p.m. weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Saturdays. Construction is prohibited on Sundays and Holidays. '_. No pile driving is allowed for construction of the garage. 3. All internal combustion engines for construnon equipment used on the site will be properly muffled and maintained. 4. Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines is strictly prohibited. 5. All stationary noise generating construction equipment, such as air compressors and portable power generator, will be located as far as practical from the existing residences and businesses. 6. Occupants of the Aloha Apartment complex and tenants of the Pruneyard will be notified of the construction schdule in writing, and an on -site contact person and phone number shall be provided in the notice. 7. All active construction areas shall be watered at least twice daily. 8. Cover all trucks hauling soil and other loose materials stationed or prior to leaving the site. 9. Pave, apply water, or apply non -toxic soil stabilizers on all unpaved surfaces, and staging areas at the construction site. 10. Sweep daily all paved access roads, parking areas, staging areas, and adjacent public streets as directed by the City Engineer. 11. Enclose, cover, water or apply <oil binders to exposed stockpiles. 12. Limit traffic speeds on unpaved surfaces to 15 mph. 13. Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent runoff to all roadways, waterways or pubic walkways accessed by the public. 14. Replant vegetation in disturbed areas as soon as possible. 15. Establish a program for participation of vehicle trip reduction by construction crews. 16. Provide a monthly status report to the Building Official verifying conditions of the site, progress of construction and the implementation of construction mitigation measures. City Councii Ordinance No. _ SDP 97-01/S 97-20 - 1999 S. Bascom Avenue - Pruneyard Page 8 15. Parking during Constriction: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a diagrammatic site plan and narrative description indicating the location(s) and number of parking spaces that will be displaced during construction, any proposed stacking area and the number of cars accommodated on -site in the stacking area, the number and schedule of attendants supe^:icing the temporary parking arrangements, and the location of off -site parking and shuttle for tenants of the Pruneyard. The temporary parking plan shall be subject to review and approval by the City Council prior to issuance of building permits. 16. Archaeological Mitigation and Monitoring Program. Provide an archaeological monitoring program prepared by a qualified archaeologist to monitor all subsurface excavation and construction for review and approval by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. The program shall be consistent with the mitigation measures specified in the Expanded Initial Study dated 10/22/97 (page 41) prepared by David J. Powers and Associates, Inc. 17. Demolition Permit: The applicant is required to obtain a demolition permit, subject to review and approval by the Building Official prior to the demolition of structures or other on -site improvements that will be removed in conjunction with the approved plans. 18. Traffic Circulation A. Campisi Dedication: Applicant shall reserve a "no build" area on the subject property to provide for the future extension of Campisi Way in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and the City Engineer, B. Campisi Way Agreement and Contribution: The applicant shall agree to enter into a street improvement agreement to design and construct Campisi Way from its present terminus onto the Pruneyard property and to contribute a minimum of 5600,000.00 as a proportional share of the cost to extend Campisi Way to the Pruneyard proper'y consistent with the Circulation Element of the Campbell General Plan. The cost to extend Campisi Way will include design/engineering. land acquisition, severance costs, construction, and demolition of structures at the Aloha Apartments necessary to accommodate the roadway. The agreement shall stipulate that the applicant will be responsible for designing, bidding and constructing the roadway with the City contributing up to S600,000.00 toward the costs of acquisition and/or construction of the roadway. Any project cost savings below $1.2 million shall be shared equally between the City and the applicant. The distribution of any cost over $1.2 million shall be resolved in the street improvement agreement. The agreement shall identify a development and improvement schedule that reasonably corresponds with the planned occupancy of the new office building. City Council Ordinance No. _ SDP 97-Ol/S 97-20 - 1999 S. Bascom Averue - Pruncyard Paee 9 The agreement shall be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and contain such additional terms as are reasonable or customary to carry out the intent of this condition. C. Expenditure of Funds: The funds collected for the extension of Campisi Way shall be deposited, invested and accounted for pursuant to California Government Code Section 66006. If the necessary funds are not appropriated by the City for the construction of the Campisi Way extension within five years, the City shall retain $400,000 to be used to improve traffic circulation in the vicinity of the Pruneyard to offset vehicle trips generated by the new development and shall refund $200,000 t(, the applicant. The extension of Campisi Way is not required prior to the development or occupancy of the approved projects permitted under SDP 97-01, S 97-20, and UP 97-11. D. On -site Property Modifications: The applicant shall be responsible for the costs of all or, -site modifrcations(e.g, parking, curbs, .lat work, etc.) necessary to accommodate a future terminus of Campisi Way to the Pruneyard property, at the time the extension is constructed. E. ?,e cment Parkine: The applicant shall work with the City to accommodate parking displaced by the Campisi expansion. 19. Los Gatos Creek Tral Access Applicant shall prepare appropriate plans and/or studies as directed by the City Engineer to determine an appropriate location to relocate the existing access to the Los Gatos Creek Trail from the Pruneyard property. Construction of the connection shall be completed by the applicant prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new office building. If the Campisi Way extension is implemented then the existing access off of Campisi Way will satisfy this condition. 20. Public Storrs Draina¢e Facilities Applicant shall undertake a study in accordance with generally accepted engineer practice to determine requirements for relocation of public storm drainage facilities, if any, and for relocation of public utilities, if any, as required to meet these conditions of approval. If required, submit storm drainage relocation plans and/or public utility relocation plans. 21. Rgplaeement of Pavement Surface The applicant shall work with staff to ascertain the condition of existing paved surfaces throughout the Pruneyard and prepare a site plan identifying failed pavement. Areas showing failure or disrepair shall be replaced or rehabilitated if possible as determined by City staff. Prior to the installation of new pavement or asphalt surfaces, the applicant shall prepare a plan for review and approval by the Land Development Division of the Public Works Department providing section details of the replacement pavement. City Council Ordmance No. SDP 97-Ol/S 97-20 - 1999 S. Bascom Avenue - Prunevard Page 10 "_. Speed Bumps: Submit plans showing the location and replacement of all on -site speed bumps with City -approved speed undulations (speed bumps). 23. Underuround Utilities: Install new on -site utilities underground per Section 20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings. Provide evidence from all utility companies that the proposed de, elopment modifications can be served. Comply with the plan submittal, permit and fee requirements of the utilities associated with new or modified service connections. 24. Gradine Plans: All grading plans shall meet City standards as deemed appropriate for the proposed development. A grading permit shall be required in conjunction with building permits. 25 Drainage Plans: Submit grading and drainage plans with hydrology and hydraulic calculations for existing on -site drainage improvements and for proposed on -site grading improvements showing proposed pad elevations of new structures, existing and proposed on -site and off -site grading and storm drainage systems and controlled site drainage onto public right-of-way. 26 Gradmv-/Erosion Control Plans: Submit final grading, grading and erosion control plans to the Community Development and Public Works Departments for approval prior to issuance ofbuilding or grading permits. 27. Modified Storm Drainage Easement The applicant shall modify the existing 20-foot wide City storm drainage easement that lies parallel and immediLtely adjacent to the westerly property line of the Pnmeyard to reflect the allowed encroachment of approximately 175 feet in length of the western building wall of the parking garage The encroachment into the easement in a westerly direction, shall not exceed four feet six inches. The revised easement description shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and the City Attorney. 28. Encroachment Pemtits: Submi; application for an encroachment permit(s), pay f-es and post surety for any construction within the City's right-of-way. 29 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Permit (NPDES) The applicant is advised that the Regional Water Quality Control Board requires that all construction projects on sites larger than five acres must obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination (NPDES) permit. Permit conditions may require construction and post -construction storm water management plans. The applicant is responsible for obtaining this permit, providing plans and paying associated fees. Copies of the permits shall be provided to the Community Development and Public Works Departments prior to the issuance of building permits. City Council Ordinance No. SDP 97-01/S 97-20 - 1999 S. Bascom Avenue - Pruneyard Page 1 I The applicant shall comply with the California Storm Water Best Management Practices HandLook prepared by the Storrs Water Quality Task Force, Santa Clara Valley Water Distrct. 30. Utintie;_ All utilities and utility pedestals for new or modified building areas shall be diagrammed on a site utility plan indicating the location of the pedestals and how the equipment will be screened prior to the installation of any utility pedestals (r;ansformers) on site., subject to the review and approval by the Community Development Director. 31 Garbage Collection: Trash containers of a size and quantity necessary to serve new or modified building areas shall be located in areas approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosures, shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self -closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 32, Mechanical Equipment7 All roof -mounted and ground level mechanical equipment, on new or remodeled structures on site, which are visible from the public right of way shall be screened with similar building materials subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 33. Handicapped Accessibil�: All new and remodeled buildings shall provide handicap access in accordance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC), and the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS) and the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). 34. Truck Deliveries and Trash Collection: Trash pick-up and Truck deliveries adjacent to the northern boundary of the site will not be allowed earlier than 6:00 a.m. prior to and following the development approval of SDP 97-01/S 97-20/UP 97-1 I. 35. Transportation Demand Management: Applicant shall participate in a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for future tenants and incorporate participation in such program through the covenants, conditions and restrictions. This program shall incorporate, but is not limited to the following: 1. Provision of Bicycle Parking Facilities. 2. Participation in shurtle/car pool service to public transit facilities such as light rail stations or park and ride lots when these facilities are constructed. 3. Accommodation of bus stop locations, if public bus service is provided to the site. 4. Van car pool priority parking spaces. 5. Provision of changing facilities for employees bicycling to work in the new office bui!ding. City Council Ordinance No. SDP 97-01/S 97-20 — 1999 S. Bascom Avenue — Pruneyard Page 12 36. Car Detailing Station: The applicant shall provide a detailed operational statement and plans indicating the location of the car detailing station on the ground floor of the parking garage for review and approval by the Community Development Director and the Public Works Director. The operation of the car detailing statior, shall comply with all regulations, and practices and obtain all necessary permits to comply with the non -point source pollution controls/management. PASSED AND ADOPT-:) this 20th day of January , 199 e, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COLTNCILMEM 3ERS: Conant, I°urtado, Dougherty, Watson NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Dean APPROV:?J : ✓ l me aeon, Mayor ATTEST: ✓,rx,c_ Anne Bybee, City er ram'" f M �r6`MwwL0" 4_ now "o M W 12. Request for Fee Waiver for Use of Community Center Facilities by Campbell Chamber of Commerce This action approves a waiver of use fees and damage deposit, but assesses staff costs and processing fee for use of the Campbell Community Center by the Chamber of Commerce for their annual Citizen of the Year Dinner on Saturday, February 28, 1998. 13. Civic Improvement Commission: Recommended Street Names LJst This action approves the Civic Improvement Commissions recommendation of street names for new developments in the City. 14. Approval to Issue Request for Proposals (RFP) for Consultant Services - Campbell Improvement Project (98-01) (Resolution/Roll Call Vote) Resolution 9328 authorizes the issuance of a Request for Proposals (RFP) for improvements at Campbell Park (Project 98-01). M/S: Conant/Furtado - to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Conant, Furtado, Dougherty, Dean, Watson NOES: Councilmembers: None !rr • r r ;J• • •. y .r ur 3. Ordinance 1955 Approving a Special Development Permit (SDP 97-01) and Site and Architectural Approval (S 97.20) to allow the construction of a six story, 130,000 square foot office building and a four -level parking garage on property located at 1999 S. Bascom Avenue in a C-2-0 (General CommerciaUOvu*) Zoning District (Second Reading/Roll Call Vote) Councilmember Dean stain that he would be abstaining on this item due to a conflict of interest, and left the Council Chamber. A letter from David Word, Applicant, agreeing to Condition of Approval 18 B. was noted for the record. M/S: Furtado/Conant - to approv: second reading of Ordinance 1935 approving a Special Development Permit (STI 1 97-01) and Site and Architectural Approval (S 97-20) to allow the construction of a six story, 130,000 square foot office building and a four -level parking garage on property located at 1999 S. Bascom Avenue In a y ..woca ,neap C-2-0 (General Commerdal/Overlay) Zoning District, subject to Conditions of Approval. Motion adopted by the following roll gall vote: AYES Councilmembers: Conant, Furtado, Dougherty, Watson NOES Councihnembers: None ABSTAIN: Coundtinembers: Dean Councilmember Dean returned to the Council Chamber. ORAL REQUESTS Rollins Cushman, 1274 Walnut Drive, Campbell, appeared before the City Council and requested an update regarding P-Com. City Attorney Seligman stated that he is not aware of any further disruptive activity since P.. Com relocated its manufacturing and delivery operation to another location. PUBLIC HEARING! AIND INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES 15. Amendment to Public Employees' Retirement System Contract (Introduction of Ordinance/Resolution/Roll Call Vote) This is the time and place for a public hearing to consider an amendment to the public Employees' Retirement System Contract. Administrative Services Director Lee - Staff Report dated January 20, 1998. Mayor Watson declared the public heating open and asked if anyone in the audience wished to be heard. There being no one wishing to speak. Mayor Watson closed the public hearing. M/S: Furtado/Conant - to introduce Ordinance 1956 authorizing an amendmmt to the contract between the City Council of the City of Campbell and the Board of Administration of the California Public Employee's Redretuent System for first reading, and adopt Resolution 9328 which b a Resolution of Intention to approve an amendment to the contract betweer the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System and the City Council of the City of Campbell. Motion adopted by the following roll can vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Conant, Furtado, Dougherty, Dean, Watson NOES: Coundimembers: None Mtwm of 1/10/98 City Comes Meeting S -- WILLIAM WILSON g ASSOC ID:408-371-3831 JAN 16'98 12:34 No.007 P.01 i It I'izuNLYnRi> ;r. W IIIIAa1 W11NON h ASSUCIAII January 16,1990 Mr. Robert Kass Public Works Diredlor City of Campbell 70 North First Street Campbell. CA 95" Re: 1,DP97-Ol/S97-20 Dear Bob: ,Ili, letter is written in response to your letter to me dated January 14,1998, and to confirm ou r telephone conversation on January 15th regarding dx same subirN PruneYard Associates, Lt.0 ("Applicant") will enter into a street improvement agreement with the City of Campbell regarding the Camplsi Way extension in accordance with Condition of Approval 1H.B. The Applicant and the City agree to waive all but the last sentence of Condition of Approval 18.C. With the City's receipt of this waiver it is my undentanding that the second and final reading of SDP 97-01/997-20 —it be scheduled and voted on by the City Council on January 20,1998- 1 look forward to working carefully with you to enter into a mutually beneficial street Improvement agreement and to realize the extension of Campisi Way. David R. Word PrumYard Associated, LI C Member cc: Bernard M. %r*y - City Manager Steve Piaaecki • Community Development Director 1999 1.1M1h IWy rm .1 rcmrr Surly 21x1 Cmnphrll CA 95fM 7eRldame 111181 171 47(x1 Firermrle MPNI 371 .1a11 City Item No: Category: Public Hearing Council Meeting Date: January 13, 1998 URepotl _ TITLE Continued Hearing for the Approval of a Special Development Permit and a Site and Architectural Permit to allow the Construction of a 130,000 square foot Office Building and Parking Garage — 1999 S. Bascom Ave. -- Application of Mr. David Word on behalf of Pruneyard Associates. LLP. - SDP 97-01/S 97-20 RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following actions: I . Grant a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed project; ani ?. Introduce an Ordinance for first reading, incorporating the attached findings, APPROVING a Special Development Permit, and a Site and Architectural permit, to construct a 130,000 gross square foot, six -story office building, and a four level parking garage, subject to the conditions of approval. Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is requesting approval of a Special Development Permit and a Site and Architectural Approval to construct a 130.000 gross square foot, six -story office building, and a four level parking garage on the west side the Pruneyard property. Project Background: The development proposal was heard by the City Council on December 8, 1997. The Council continued the hearing to the meeting of January 6, 1997 gave direction to address the following issues: • The timing and funding of the Campisi Way extension. • The proposed relocation of the Los Gatos Creek Trail access. • For the applicant to meet with the tenants of the Pruneyard Towers to discuss temporary parking measures, and to meet with the tenants of the Aloha Apartments to address concerns regarding construction and other development concerns. ANALYSIS Campisi Way Extension: In regards to the extension of Campisi Way, the Council established that: • The extension is a necessary improvement to the circulation system to the Bascom/Hamilton area. • The extension would alleviate exiting on -site circulation problems by providing an additional means of access to and from the Pruneyard. City Council kerwrt — ;anuary 6, 1998 SDP 97-01 a: 20 — 1999 S. Bascom Avenue Page -2- he construction of Campisi should coincide to the proposed development to address parking/circulation issues attributed to the Pruncyard. • The construction of the extension could provide a desirable and safe means of access to the Los Gatos Creek'frail. • The dr ^toper's "proportional share" of the costs to extend Campisi Way should coma -. wth the benefits that are derived by the Pruneyard from the extension. City's C tr i Improvement Program identifies funds in the amount of $282.000 for constructin- .he first 100 feet of the Campisi to repair (ailed pavement. However, the extension of Campisi Way has not been designed or engineered. Therefore, staff finds that the most effective and punctual approach to construct the extension of Camptsi Way is to require the developer to coordinate the design and construction of the extension. If the Council wishes to pursue this option, staff recommends that that the completion of the extension within a specified time frame following the issuance occupancy permits for the proposed development in the event that the extension is not completed prior to the construction of the office development. Parkina: Two issues were regarding the parking associated with the proposed development raised: • The adequacy of the parking to meet existing and future demands. • The feasibility of accommodat ng parking during the construction phase of :he office developntent/parking garage. Shared Parking: The use of shared parking concept was approved with the original development of the site, and with the remodel of the shopping center in 1995. The Special Development Permit proposes to continue a shared parking arrangement The traffic study prepared for this project analyzed the parking demands during weekdays and weekends and concluded that the additional 448 parking spaces proposed for the development is sufficient to meet future parking demands. Should the Council find that additional parking is needed at the site, the Council could direct the applicant to increase the number of on -site parking spaces. Additional parking could be achieved by expanding the parking garage either by increasing the footprint of the building or increasing the number of floors. Parking During Construction: Tenants of the Pruneyard Towers spoke at the City Council meeting, and hav: continued to be in contact with staff regarding the following concerns: • The displacement of a substantial number of parking spaces resulting front the simultaneous construction of the office tower, parking garage, and hotel expansion. • The feasibility of the temporary parking plan. City Council Report —January 6, 1998 SDP 97-01 and S 97-20 — 1999 S. Bascom Avenue Paee -2- • Security measures for employees that must park off -site. • Temporary parking may result in unreasonable delays in the tenants accessing their vehicles. A condition of approval requires the developer to submit a site plan and operational description indicating temporary parking arrangements prior to the issuance of bui.ding permits. The plan will include the provision for off -site parking and a shuttle service for a limited number of tenants at the Pruncyard. A preliminary description has been provided by the applicant, however, details of the arrangements have not yet been finalized. The temporary parking plan will be reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineer and is subject to approval by the Community Development and Public Works Director. Los Gatos Creek Trail Access, The construction of the parking garage necessitates the relocation of the access to the Los Gatos Creek Trail. The proposed plans provided access to the Creek trail from a path that extended along the west side of the parking garage. During the development review of the project, s• '' had looked at alternatives for relocating the access including off -site relocation in it, nity of the Pruneyard. The extension of Campisi Way would provide a more desiral means of access to the Creek trail. At such time that the extension of Campisi Way is constructed, the temporary access from the Prunevard would be removed. Meetings with Tenants: At the direction of Council, the applicant has conducted meetings with the tenants of the Pruneyard Towers regarding the construction schedule and plans for temporary parking arrangements. The applicant has also scheduled a meeting with the tenants of the Aloha Apartments for January 6, 1998 to address their concerns regarding the proposed project. Special Development Permit: At its meeting of November 11, 1997, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 3134 recommending approval of the Special Development Permit. A draft City Council resolution for approval of the Special Development Permit was prepared as an attachment to the City Council Report. However, the Overlay zone, requires the City Council to render its decision by ordinance. Therefore, a draft City Council ordinance has been prepared and is attached. ALTERNATIVES 1. Deny the Special Development Permit. 2. Modify the Special Development Permit with additional conditions of approval as deemed necessary. 3. Continue the request for further review. FISCAL IMPACTS The office tenant for the proposed of. -ire building, Compuware, may generate ',ales tax revenues. The amount of revenue is not known at this time. Attachments: I . Draft ordinance Approving the Special Development Permit, subject to the conditions of approval. 2. City Council M'.autes dated December 8, 1997 3. City Council Report dated December 8, 1997 4. Planning Commissiro Resolution 3134 5. Planning Commission Minutes dated November 11. 1997 6. Planning Commission Staff Report dated November 11, 1997 7. Expanded Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Program 8. Reduced Exhibits Prepared by: _ Gloria Sciara, Planner Il Reviewed by: : Steve Piasecki, Community Development Director Approved by: Bernard M. Strojny, City Manager APES Councilmembers: Conant, Furtado, Dean, Watson NOES Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: Dougherty ORAL. REQUESTS a. Susanne Walter, 1381 Estrellita Way, Campbell, appeared before the City Council and stated that a Referendum Petition was filed today with the City Clerk. b. Neal Locke, 200 N. 2n0 Street, Campbell, appeared before the City Council to express appreciation to the community for their support of the referendum. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MROD ' TION OF O DM ANM 11. Application of David Word, on behalf of William Wilson and Associates, fog approval of a Special Development Permit (SDP 97-01) and Site and Architectural Approval (S 97-20) to allow the construction of a six story, 130,000 square foot office building and a four -level parking garage on property located at 1999 S. Bascom Avenue in a C-2-0 (General Commercial/Overlay) Zoning District (Introduction of Ordinance/Roll Call Vote) (Cont'd. 12/8/97) Councilmember Dean stated that he would not be participating on this item due to a conflict of interest, and left the Council Chamber. This is the time and place for a continued public hearing to consider the application of David Word, on behalf of William Wilson and Associates, for approval of a Special Development Permit (SDP 97-01) and Site and Architectural Approval (S 97-20) to allow the construction of a six story, 130,000 square foot office building and a four - level parking garage on property located at 1999 S. Bascom Avenue in ■ C-: -0 (General Commercial/Overlay) Zoning District. Planner 11 iciara - Staff Report dated January f, 1998. Community Development Director Piasecki presented an amendment to the condition of approval regarding Campisi Way. Mayor Watson declared the public hearing open and asked if anyone in the audience wished to be heard. Davi: Word, on behalf of Pruneyara Associates, LLC, Applicant, appeared before the City Council and spoke regarding the conditions of approval regarding color, building ,: aterials and shape of the penthouse on the office tower, and requested that approval of these conditions be done at the staff level. Minutes of IN" City Council me"Ing 4 Councilmember Dougherty arrived at 7:50 p.m David Word, Applicant, spoke regarding the Campisi Way condition of aproval and the preliminary parking plan. Mr. Word commented on meetings that were held with the tenants of the Pruneyard and residents of the Aloha Apartments. Mr. Word also responded to Councilmember Furtado's comments regarding phasing the project which was how the project was initially presented. Diane Brown, 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, Campbell, appeared before the City Council and expressed concerns regarding that the parking plan does not adequately address the tenants' concerns. Nick Siersema, 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, Campbell, appeared before the City Council on behalf of himself and another tenant, Mike Hum, and expressed concerns regarding the parking plan which they believe does not adequately address the concerns of the tenants. William Stroup, 909 Capri Drive, Campbell, appeared before the City Council and expressed concerns regarding parkutg stating that there is not enough parking currently and the problem will get worse when construction starts. Mr. Stroup also expressed concerns regarding the previous traffic and parking studies that were conducted which he believes were conducted at non -peak times and therefore not very reliable. Mr. Stroup requested that either the project be phased or not approved until an adequate parking plan is approved. George Malek, 19309 Overlook Road, Los Gatos, appeared before the City CoLwil and expressed contents regarding the parking plan. Warren Ristow, 1999 S. Bascom %venue, Campbell, appeared before the City Council and expressed concerns regarding parking. Ross Kay, 360 University Avenue, Palo Alto, appeared before the City Council on behalf of Left At Albuquerque stating that parking is a major issue. Mr. Kay commented that a one hour meeting with tenants is not sufficient to discuss all of the parking issues, but there should be a workable solution if given additional time to discuss the issues. Brute (no last name stated), representing Guido's Restaurant, appeared before the City Council and expressed concerns about the location of the parking garage which will not work for the retail component. Bruna asked whether the parking structure could be moved closer to the retail porticn, and suggested there might be other ideas/suggestions from tenants to address the concerns raised. Jennifer Filzen, 1845 S. Bascom Avenue, Campbell, appeared before the City Council and commented on the meeting with the Pruneyard and tenants of the Aloba Apartments. Minot" of 1/6Na City Council Meeting S George Kasolas, 001 S. Bascom Avenue, Campbell, appeared before the City Council and expressed various .)ncerns regarding the parking. David Word, Pruneyard Associates, appeared before the City Council and responded to some of the concerns raised by the speakers. There being no one else wishing to be heard, Mayor Watson closed the public hearing. Recess/Reconvene: Mayor Watson declared a recess at 9:30 p.m. The City Council reconvened at 9:40 p.m. City Council Discussion: In the discussion that followed, it was the consensus of the City Council that the parking issues need to be addressed and a definite parking plan needs to be approved by the City Council before building permits are issued. It was suggested that a task force of Pruneyard Associates management and tenants be formed to develop a workable parking plan. In response to Mayor Watson's question regarding the condition of approval relating to the Campisi Way extension, City Attorney Seligman advised that the City Council could impose the condition unilaterally. David Word, Applicant, appeared before the City Council and stated that after listening to all of the comments, it is apparent that he should be working with the tenants to develop a parking plan, and indicated that he would be willing to form a task force of interested retail and office tenants to develop a parking plan. It was the consensus of the City Council that issues relating to building aesthetics could be worked out at the staff level and that the preferred access to the Los Gatos Creek trail would be Campisi Way assuming the Campisi extension moves forward. Community Development Director Piasccki suggested that Condition of Approval #20 be amended to add wording "if the Campisi access is successful in being implemented then the existing Campisi access would satisfy this condition.' Pursuant to City Council discussion, City Attorney Seligman advised that the following conditions would need to be amended: • Condition 3.B. Amend so that the Community Development Director would have final approval instead of Site and Architectural Review Committee and Planning Commission. Minutes of 1/6199 City Council M••tlq 6 • Condition 16. The temporary parking plan shall be subject to review and approval by the City Council prior to the issuance of building permit, instead of the Community Development Director and Public Works Director. Change "the proposed stacking area..." to "any stacking area..." • Condition 19B. Amend with wording distributed this evening, and include an additional sentence as follows: "The agreement shall be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and contain such additional terms as are reasonable or customary to carry out the intent of this condition." • Conditions 3A and 4. Change review and approvdi by Community Development Director instead of Site and Architectural Review Committee and Planning Commission. M/S: Conant/Dougherty - that the City Council grant a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed project, and to introduce Ordinance 1455 approving a Special Development Permit (SDP 97-01) and Site and Architectural Approval (S 97-20) to allow the construction of a six -story, 130,000 square foot office building and a four -level parking garage on property located at 1999 S. 1i:scom Avenue in a C-2-0 (General Commercial/Overlay) Zoning District with amended Conditions of Approval, for first reading. Motion adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES Councilmembers: Conant, Furtado, Dougherty, Watson NOES Councilmembers: None ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: Dean The City Clerk read the title of Ordinance 1955. M/S: Conant/Dougherty - that further reading of Ordinance 1955 be waived. Motion adopted by a 4-0-0-1 vote, Councilmember Dean abstaining. Councihnember Dean returned to the Council Chamber at 10:40 p.m. 12. Review and Approval of Recommended Parking Adjustments - S 97-23/1JP 97-18 - 125 E. Campbell Avenue (Resolution/RoU Call Vote) This is the time and place for a public hearing to consider an adjustment to parking requirements to allow the construction of a mixed use project on property located at 125 E. Campbell Avenue. Associate Planner Haley - Staff Report dated Jan.mary 6, 1998. Mayor Watson declared the public hearing orxn and asked if anyone in the audience wished to be heard. Minutes of 1/6198 City Council Meeting 7 r T II R U N F Y A R D a. Jamary 6. 1998 To: Members of The City Council of the City of Campbell: The PruneYard recognizes that construction of the parking garage and office building will cause disruption, primarily to the parking for the office tenants. We have conducted several meetings with .he office tenants, one retail tenant meeting and a meeting with residents of the Aloha Apartments. These meetings attracted a total of approximately 100 attendees. These interested panics all have legitimate concerns and we are committed to work with them to minimize the impact of construction for them. This packet outlines the parking program which we have developed with the assistance of professional traffic consultants and Ampco Parking Systems, nationwide experts in the parking industry. The following is an outline of the components of the interim parking program. The additional attached pages provide the analysis of space availability and a site plan showing each parking field. Also, for your information, you will find a list of "Most Commonly Asked Questions" compiled from the tenant meetings which we intend to provide to our tenants. The Parking Program I. Tenant Assisted/Macked Parking There will he 485 available parking spaces in the office parking areas during construction. These will consist of 305 regular spaces and 180 stacking spaces. The procedure for parking will be"follows: A tenant. client or visitor wishing to go to either office building will be able to self -park his her own car in the parking lots and take the keys as long as there are open spaces. Parking assistants will be in all areas to direct people to the open spaces. After all self -park spaces are filled, the stacking will begin. Vehicles will he loosely parked in the designated stacking areas. To maintain access for fire equipment in case of emergency, stacking will consist of only one horizontally parked car behind the regularly parked cars. Parking assistants will direct the driver to the available space. The driver of the "stacked" vehicle will luck the vehicle and leave the keys with the attendant in exchange for a parking ticket. The parking attendant will then be able to move the vehicle if the driver of the blocked vehicle wishes to leave. 2. Shuttle Service A shuttle bus servicing approximately 175 to 225 riders will run continuously during the day between The PruneYard and a designated parking lot. J. Parking Data Base/Permit Program A parking data base for all employees of the office buildings and retail is current]% being developed and a color ceded permit will be issued for each vehicle. This will enable us to communicate .verb tenants if necessary during the construction per•od and further it will enable us to determine where retail and office tenants are parking. 4. Other Parking Alternatives Offering to par for bus passes for riders on Santa Clara County Transit System Providing specially located ratpoolwan pool parking and setting up a Commute Manager for matching riders Offer bicycle incentives t, - The PruneYard - Parking Space Availability Analysis [Parking Lot Ca acMos - Currant 11" Demand Lot III p spaces Factor total Demand 7 3851 95 % 366 8 95 95% 90 9 258 95% 245 Total 738 95% 701 [Parking Lot Capac,kiss - During Construction Plus Loth S Snare, S Stack Total ces 0 S aces 7 35 35 701 8 95 56 151 9 1751 89 264 Total 1 3051 180 488 Total Parking Demand - Current 701 Total Parking Available During Const 485 C. Parking Excess/(Shortage): (216) Shuttle Service It rat Coin uware Em 10 ees 150 Other - Office Budding Employees 1 75 D. Total Shuttle Service Riders' 1 2y E. I Parking ExcessllShortagel: 9 Ridership shown does not include the estimated 100 retail employees which are expected to uhhze the service Prepared by Ampco System Parking e IL e The PrJneYard - Parking Space Availability Analysis Back -Up Plan Back-U Plan t1 - Add notel Lot Demand Total Lott Of S aces Factor Demand 10 106 95% 101 F. Total 106 95% 101 Park Lot Capacities - During Consfruetbn Plus Stack Total Lot t t S es S aces t S ces 7.8.9 305 180 485 10 106 40 146 G. Total 4111 2201 631 Total Parkmg Demand - Current 802 Total Parking Available During Const. 631 H. Parking Excess/(Shortage): 171 ShuteM Service Ridershi Com uware Em Io ees 150 Other - Office Building Employees 79 /. Total Shuttle Service Riders' 22 51 J. jParking Excessl(Shortagel: 54 ' Ridership shown does not include the estimated 100 retail employees which am expected to utilize the service Prepared by Arnpco System Parking 2 emu: s 0 1 3 nN 3AV WODSV9 --� ,, ��3`+"€i+C'�E��5�t3��t.C�� Y :��C�ts"s�t;�G _ •, ' ; ��C:��C?�Cq��_ � _. gif r 4� I I—. 4 1 W EBo • � ► �: ,s,p� i� IFD PruneYard Expansion - Most Commonly Asked Questions - Office Q: What is the scope of the proposed expansion to the PruncYard. A: The expansion consists of a 54-room addition to the Inn, a 120,000 sq. ft. office building and a four -level parking garage accommodating approximately 739 cars. Q: Where will the parking garage and new office building be located? A: The parking garage will be located in the Northwestern comer of the property The office building will be located between the two existing office buildings set back to form a U Shape. There is a scale model in the management office for all to sec. Q: What is the development schedule? A: Once construction commences and barring any unforeseen delays, the parking garage and the Inn addition will take eight months to complete and the office building will take eleven months. Assuming final approvals in January 1998. some minor areas may be blocked off for relocation and installation of utility lines at approximately the beginning of February. Groundbreaking for the garage and office building could take place in March. Demolition of the old retail area for the Inn expansion will commence approximately March Isi. 'Tenants will be notified of the schedule as soon as it is finalized. Q: Why is the parking garage not being built first? A: First, there is the need to meet the delivery requirements of the lead tenant for the new office building. Secondly, building the garage and office building simultaneously will shorten the time of disruption of The PruncYard by about one year. Third, phasing the parking gars a first will not significantly reduce the area required for construction staging ast, here is a cost savings by building both the arking garage and the office building together. Q: Will any of the entrances/exits to the PruneYard be closed during or after construction? A: All entrances/exits to the PruncYard will remain open during and after construction. On South Bascom there arc three driveways and on Campbell Avenue there are also three driveways. Q: Parking is already light at the PruncVard. Ilow will the tenants, clients and visitors park during construction? A: During construction there will be a loss of 4'_7 parking spaces in the construction zones. Those spaces will be regained by an on -site parking attendant/stacking parking program in which four areas will be utilized for "stacking" and off -site parking for certain tenants who have agreed to park off - site. Additionally, a parking data base which will include all office and retail tenants is being developed in which each tenant will be issued a color -coded parking permit to help us ciosely track where employees are parking and enable rapid communication with tenants if necessary. Q: How will 1 know if 1 have to park off -site? A: All off -site parking participants will have agreed to park off -site. All other tenants, their clients and visitors will always be accommodated in the on -site tenant assisted/slacking parking areas. Q: What parking will be eliminated during construction? A: Much of the existing parking in the Northwest comer of the property will be eliminated to build the parking garage. Also, the area behind'fower I extending to Tower 11 will be fenced for the construction of the new office building. I Q: Which areas will be designated stacking areas? A: There will be four: The area between the two office buildings, the area west and south of Tower It, an area north of Tower 1 and the Jim parking lot. Q: How many parking attendants will there be? A: There will be attendants in every area which will utilize stacking. The number of attendants will be adjusted according to the needs to ensure prompt service. The attendants will be able to communicate with each other by radio. Q: Describe how the tenant assist parking will work? A: A tenant, client or visitor wishing to go to either office building will be able to self'- park his/her own car in the parking lots and take the keys as long as there are open spaces. Parking assistants will be in all areas to direct people to the open spaces. After all self park spaces are filled, the stacking will begin. Vehicles will be loosely parked in the designated stacking areas. To maintain access for fire equipment in case of enmergency, stacking will consist of only one horizontally parked car behind the regularly parked cars. parking assistants will direct the driver to the available space. The driver of the "stacked" vehicle will lock the vehicle and leave the keys with the attendant in exchange for a parking ticket. The parking attendant will then be able to move the vehicle if the driver of the blocked vehicle wishes to leave. Q: How long will it take to retrieve my car from the stacked area when 1 want to Icavc? A: It will take up to 10 minutes maximum. All vehicles utilizing the stacking areas will be within the PruneYard and there will he enough parking attendants to ensure prompt service. Q: Will I be charged for parking? A: There will be no charge for parking and there will be no tipping. All costs of the p.irking program will be paid for by the Landlord. No costs will be passed back lhlough to the tenants. Q: Can anything be done to lengthen the light at Union and Campbell Avenue? A: We will work with Public Works to see if:mythiog can be done. Q: How do we relay to visitors the method of parking? A: There will be a number of signs directing traffic. Q: Will there be short term parking areas and long term parking areas? A: There will be a number of spaces held open near each of the two buildings for tenants/clients/visitors who will be in and out frequently or who will be staying for only a brief period. These numbers can he adjusted as we determine demand. Q: Who is liable for cars when parked? A: If your vehicle is damaged or stolen while under the control of Ampco Parking Systems, Ampco is liable. All vehicles should always be locked and valuables secured out of sight. Q: Whom do we contact with questions or complaints about the parking program? A: Contact the management office immediately with any questions or complaints at (408) 371.4700. Q: Where will construction workers park? A: A limited number of construction vehicles will be parked within the construction fence. All other construction workers will be required to park off site. The general contractor will be responsible for shuttling construction workers back and lorih. Q: How often will the shuttle bus run? A: The shuttle bus will run continually at peak hours: 7:00 to 9:00 AM, 11::30AM to 1:30 PM and 5:00 to 7:00 I'M. (Times will be adjusted if needed.) II will run at 15 -inute intervals at all other limes during, the day. Q: Where will the shuttle parking lots be located? A: There arc several possible locations which are from .5 to 1.5 miles in distance. Participating tenants will be provided a map when the remote locations are finalized. Q: Will there be security at the shuttle sites? A: Yes. Q: If I sign up for the shuttle, do 1 have to stay with it for the duration? A: We will work with all tenants to meet their particular needs. II'the shuttle does not work for someone, by all means we would want to switch them to the on - site parking program. We arc planning to mike the shultic "1'un" by offering some incentives to use this parking alternative. 1 /6/98 The PruneYard DRAFT 1 CONSTRUCTION PERIOD PARKING PLAN REVISION # 6 March 25, 1998 Ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page OVERVIEW 1 i. ASSESSMENT OF PARKING DEMAND 2 Parking Space Availability Analysis 3 ATTENDANT-ASSISTISTACK PARKING 4 A. Service Concept 4 B Areas of Service 4 C. Staffing/Hours of Operation 4 D. Communications 5 E. Patron Waiting Times 5 F. Disabled Parking 5 G. Movement of Vehicles 5 H. After -Hours Access 5 I. Security 6 J. Responsibility of Vehicles 6 K. Signage 7 L. Special Events 7 M. Back-up Plans 7 III. VALET PARKING 8 A. Service Concept B. Areas of Service 8 C. Staffing/Hours of Operation 9 D. Communications 9 E. Patron Waiting Times 9 F. Visitor Parking/Short-Term Parking 9 G. After -Hours Access 10 H Security 10 I. Responsibility of Vehicles 10 IV. ADDITIONAL ON -SITE PARKING 11 V. OFF -SITE SHUTTLE SERVICE 11 A. Service Concept 11 B. Areas of Service 11 C. Staffing/Hours of Operation 12 D. Communications 12 E. Patron Waiting Times 12 F. Security 13 G. Incentives 13 VI. ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION 14 VII. TRANSPORTATION FAIR 15 VIII. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR PARKING 15 IX. IMPLEMENTATION 15 X. COMPLIANCE 16 XI. PARKING COMPLAINT PROCESS 16 EXHIBIT A. SIGNAGE EXHIBIT B. SITE PLAN EXHIBIT C. COMPLAINT FORM PruneYard Construction Period - Parkina Plan Overview The PruneYard is constructing a new 120.000 square foot office tower and a 738 space garage on the west side of the complex. The erection of the new buildings will result in the temporary loss of 427 parking spaces during the initial 8 months of the construction period. At that time, the new garage will be ready for occupancy, which will completely eliminate the anticipated parking shortfall. This plan has been developed to clearly define the steps which the PruneYard will take to mitigate this loss of parking space during construction, to minimize the inconvenience to all tenants of the project (both office and retail) as well as their visitors. The plan is comprised of four main components, as follows, 1. Attendant-AssistlStack Parking 2. Valet Parking 3. Off -Site Shuttle Service 4. Alternative Transportation The foregoing items, when employed as part of an integrated parking management plan, will provide the PruneYard with a workable strategy to meet the parking needs of its tenants and visitors during this interim period of growth The following pages provide details on the overall scope of the project and each of the plan's components. This plan is intended to be dynamic, and includes built-in flexibility to alter its nature in order to meet the changing parking needs of the PruneYard All costs associated with the implementation of this parking plan shall be borne by the project owner as a development cost. There shall not be pass -through costs to PruneYard tenants resulting from the execution of this plan. We look forward to reviewing this plan with the PruneYard Parking Task Force and are open to discuss and/or alter any portions of the plan as necessary, in the pwsuit of developing "a really good parking plan!" Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 1 PruneYard Construction Penn -Parkins Plan Assessment of Parking Demand In order to develop a plan which meets the needs of the project during the construction period, it is necessary to start with a reasonable estimate of the parking demand which can be expected to be experienced. Informal surveys were conducted in March 1997 by the William Wilson & Associates (WW&A) staff. The results of these surveys pointed to the need to obtain a professional analysis of the site The traffic engineering firm of Linscott. Law and Greenspan was then hired by WW&A to provide hourly occupancy surveys of the entire project. The work was completed in July, 1997 and indicated a peak demand in the office parking areas of approximately 76% of total available spaces. We noted in our review of this study that July (in fact aowee entire late iM parking September summer period) generally demand, and that these figures should be increased to take into account the higher demand levels associated with early spring and fall Note. November and December generally represent the highest parking demand, with a gradual drop-off through spring and into summer. Current observations of the lots made during the first 2 weeks of January 1998 by Ampco personnel during the consistently ce demand showed occupanceriods y in 0 OOhe 78%t80% am. and 2:00 - 3:00 p.m.) range. To err on the side of conservatism, we used a 95% demand figure to base all recommendations provided in this plan. The exception to th.s is the hotel lot which experiences significantly lower demand. We. have used a 65% demand figure for this lot. The charts on the next two pages provide complete details on the number of spaces available currently as well as during construction, and designate the number of additional cars which can be "stacked" in each of the available parking areas to meet this demand. The figures clearly show that o combination of attendant -assisted parking along with an off -site shuttle service wiii be required to mee: the project's parking needs during the construction period. Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 2 PruneYard Construction Period - ParRinq Plan The PruneYard - Parking Space Availability Analysis a noUuMint WWI Ua—mana Total Lot# • Spaces Factor Demand 0 0 a no apae •• - During ons on Plus stack Total lot • : Spaces Soacss N Soacas 0 98 11 o a Parking eman - urreo Tolal Parking Available During Const 616 C. Parking Shortage: anume a p ompuware Employees 100 er - �ce w mg Employees D.I ol,al Uume Service Riciers �4 E. arking urplue ased on mend: Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 3 PruneYard Construction Period - Parkin Plan II. Attendant-Assist/Stack Parking A. Service Concept The two terms, "attendant -assist" and "stack parking" are used interchangeably to describe a parking operating format where parking attendants are provided within a self -park facility to expand the number of cars which the facility can hold. The key to the concept is to let the parking lots fll naturally, i.e., allow all of the regular self park spaces to fill up as normal. Once full, rather than closing the lots, attendants stationed throughout the lots would direct additional cars to park in the aisles, blocking the other cars in. They would issue claim checks to these parkers in exchange for their keys, and would lock the keys in a nearly keybox. The attendants move cars only as necessary to let blocked vehicles exit. Toward the end of the day, as regular parking spaces become available, the attendants will move aisle cars into these spaces, to make exiting easier for all patrons. B. Areas of Service The program would be implemented at (3) parking areas serving the existing office buildings. We have identified these areas on the attached drawing as lots 7, 9 and 10. Lot 7 is the small parking area that will remain on the northwest side of the project, next to where the new parking garage is being built, Lot 9 is the large lot on the southwest side of the project, behind Tower 1. The lot serving the hotel, designated as Lot 10, will also be used for attendant -assist services. This lot is newly available through an agreement with the hotel for office parking. C. StaffinaMours of Operation The overall parking program will be overseen by a full-time on -site manager, who will report directly to WWBA. In this person's absence, another individual will be designated as the project supervisor, to oversee and direct the work of the parking attendants and shuttle driver, The service will be provided from 7.00 a m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Wednesday, and from 7:00 a.m to 11:00 p.m. on Thursdays and Fridays. In addition, the program will be offered on Saturdays from 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. to accommodate additional retail demand during this period. The chart on tha following page details the number of parking attendants which will be assigned to each of the lots during peak operating hours, which for this service is anticipated Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 4 PruneYard Construction Period - Parkin Plan to be between 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday - Friday. During earlier and later periods, each lot will normal) have one parkin�_L3tlo signed to it. Position Lot 7 Lot 9 One or more parking attendant stations will be located at convenient locations in each of the lots. The location of each of these proposed attendant stations is shown on the attached site map. D. Communications The Manager, Supervisor and one attendant at each parking lot will each have a 2-way radio to ensure prompt communication between all locations within the program. These radios will be on the same frequency used by WW&A to allow interaction with property management and security, as necessary. E. Patron Waitina Times Based on the size of the project, the level of staffing provided and our experience at providing similar services to other projects, we estimate a maximum customer wait time of no more than 5 minutes. This time is measured from the time the customer arrives at the location to retrieve their vehicle until the time the customer is in their car, ready to exit the lot. F Disabled Parkins As the construction project will remove a large number of the existing handicap - accessible parking spaces currently provided, new spaces will be provided which meet all applicable codes. These spaces will be provided in Lot 9 G. Movement of Vehicles Parking attendants will move vehicles from one space to another within a given parking lot only as required to allow other cars to exit. At no time will cars be moved from the lot in which the customer originally parked to another lot within the project. H. After -Hours Access At the designated closing time each evening, the parking attendants at each lot will move any remaining vehicles with keys to a designated spot near the front of each lot. The cars will be locked and the vehicle's license number along with the ticket number issued to the driver will be entered on a log. The log, along with Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 5 PruneYara Construction Period - Pgrkind Plan any keys, will be taken to the security desk located in the lobby of 1999 S. Bascom Avenue where it will be signed for by a WW&A security officer. Keys for any vehicles left after the posted closing time must be picked up by the tenant (or visitor) at this location, and they must present their claim ticket as proof that the vehicle is theirs. The security officer will provide an escort for any patron back to their vehicle, upon request. Note: To minimize inconvenience, the designated lot closing time will be set s.o as to minimize the possibility of having to transfer keys to the security desk. At most office -oriented projects, 7:00 p.m. has proven to be a convenient time for the vast majority of patrons. Generally, tenants who find themselves working late unexpectedly will come down to the lot prior to closing to claim their keys directly from the attendant on duty, and move the car to a space closer to their office. 1. Secunty The presence of parking attendants throughout the lots creates what is known as a deterrent effect: criminals do not want to attempt to vandalize cars when there are parking attendants present, as there is a grater likelihood of their being caught, if seen. Attendants who notice anyone hanging around in the lots under their control will be instructed to immediately summon WW&A security officers via 2-way radio. Responsibility for Vehicles Ampco System Parking will be fully responsible for the safety and security of every car whose driver has left its keys with one of our parking attendants. Any claimed damage or loss must be pointed out immediately to the attendant or. duty, who will call the manager or supervisor on duty via 2-way radio to fill out an Accident/Loss report. Ampco handles all claims directly through its regional claims administrator Once received, all claims will be handled promptly and professionally. To protect ourselves from false claims, our attendants will be required to perform a quick "walk -around" inspection of every vehicle for which a claim check is issued, to note any previously existing damage. They will mark any damage noted directly on the claim check and also point it out to the driver to eliminate the possibility of misunderstandings on this important issue. This process generally takes about 10 seconds and is a quick and nearly invisible procedure. With respect to contents of the car, we ask that patrons work with us by not leaving items of obvious value in the passenger compartment, but rather, to lock Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 6 PruneYard Construction Period - Parking Plan them in the trunk, out of sight. Our attendants require only a door key and an ignition key to perform their duties. K Sianaoe Signage will be provided to assist patrons in using the lots during the construction period. These signs will convey basic information needed to allow the program to function properly. Excessive signage is more likely to confuse than inform, and therefore a limited signage program is proposed. As the program is designed primarily to accommodate regular everyday patrons, the signage is intended to reinforce the designated use of certain parking areas and to provide information for after-hours key retrieval. Proposed signs have been provided as an attachment to this package. Special Events The attendant -assist service can easily be expanded as necessary in order to accommodate the various special event needs of the protect This may include higher than normal demand from events such as, • Sales Meetings • Major Hotel Bookings • Special Screening Movie Events In order to adjust staffing and personnel scheduling to meet these periods of unusual demand, the tenants responsible for the event will need to provide WW&A with a minimum of one week's written notice of the planned event, including (if possible) an estimate of the event's attendance, to provide time for Ampco to ensure proper planning, staffing and supervision is in place for the event. M. Back-up Plans Several back-up plans are available to increase the number of vehicles which can be accommodated u . u ie on -site lots: "Heavy" Stacking - The attendant -assist concept relies on what is referred to as a "light stack" approach. As described previously, in this scenario, there is never more than one car blocking in another, making etneving one's vehicle and exiting relatively simple. In a more urban setting, parking lots are routinely set up for heavy stacking. This generally means cars are parked up to 3 or 4 deep. It certainly has the potential to be less convenient, Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 7 PruneYard Construction Period - Parking Plan but in these situations, the parking attendants actually park more of the cars so that that they can stack them according to expected departure time. For example, cars exiting at 6:00 p.m. are placed in the back row, and cars with increasingly earlier departures are put in front of them. Finally the very front row is left open for quick in & out parking. This approach works surprisingly well, and is presented here as a possible means to further increase the number of cars which can be accommodated on -site. Potential lots to provide a heavy stack service are Lots 7 and 9. • Use of a Portion of Lot 5 for Stack Parking - A single row of cars could be stacked on the western aisle of Lot 5 for a net gain of 17 parking spaces. III. Valet Parking A. Service Concept Traditiona! valet parking, where patrons are afforded "front door -type" parking service will be offered for both office and retail patrons. In this program, cars will enter a designated valet area and proceed to a valet station where they will be greeted by a valet parking attendant. The valet will issue a claim check for their vehicle and the patron will proceed on foot to their destination. The valet will park the car in an available parking space and return to the valet station to assist another patron. Upon returr„ the patron will present his or her claim check and the valet w;II retrieve the car and return directly to the patron at the valet station. The valet service is complimentary, and tipping is not required. Signs stating this policy will be posted at every valet station and at the entrance to every valet parking area B. Areas of Service The program would be implemented at (3) parking areas serving the existing office buildings as well as the retail portion of the project. We have identified these areas on the attached drawing as Lot 8 and Area A and B. Lot 8 is the existing Visitor lot between the two office towers, Area A is a portion of Lot 1 along the project's center drive, and, Area B is in the small curb cut-out on the northwest drive aisle next to Mrs. Field's Cookies. Lot 8 will be used as the main parking area for this service, and will be used for the valet parking of cars which enter Lot 8 directly as well as all cars using the Prepared oy Ampco System Parking Page 8 PruneYard Construction Period - Parkin Plan Area B valet station (which has no parking of its own). Depending on space availability, excess valet demand from Area A may be taken to Lot 8 as well. C StBfnwHOurs of Operation The service will be provided in Lot 8 from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Valet stations at areas A and B will be operated from 5:00 p.m. - 11:00 p.m., Thursday - Saturday. Staffing will be provided as needed to meet experienced demand, but will consist of a minimum of two valet attendants assigned to each valet area during all designated operating hours. A designated valet station will be located a t convenient locations in each of the valet parking areas. The location of each of these valet stations is shown on the attached site map. D. Communications Each valet station wili have a 2-way radio to ensure prompt communication between all locations within the overall program. These radios will be on the same frequency used by WW&A to allow interaction with property management and security, as necessary. E. Patron Waiting Times Based on the need for a parking attendant to park and retrieve every vehicle that uses the valet service, we estimate a maximum customer wait time of between 5 and 10 minutes. This time is measureu from the time the customers arrives at the location to retrieve their vehicle until the time the valet returns the vehicle to the customer. F Visitor Parking/Short-Term Parking In order to accommodate visitors to the project as well as those tenants who expect to park for two hours or less, the existing Visitor Lot between the two office towers will be designated for short term use only, and will be a 100% valet. All vioi;ors and office tenants will be free to use this lot, but the parking valets will be asked to direct those patrons who expect to be longer than 2 hours to park in one of the other designated lots. The two hour parking limit will also be posted with signage. Each patron will be asked to provide his/her estimated departure time, so that the attendants can park their cars according to the departure time indicated to the attendant. Prepaivo by Ampco System Parkins Page 9 PruneYard Construction Period - Parking Plan G After -Hours Access At the designated closing time each evening, the parking valets at Aach valet area will move any remaining vehicles with keys to a designateu spot near the front of each lot. Cars dropped off by their owners at Lot 8 or Area B will be parked in Lot 8. Cars dropped off at Area A will be parked in Lot 1. The cars will be locked and the vehicle's license number along with the ticket number issued to the driver will be entered on a log The log, along with any keys, wili be taken to the security desk located in the lobby of 1999 S. Bascom Avenue where it will be signed for by a WW&A security officer. Keys for any vehicles left after the posted closing time must be picked up by the tenant (or visitor) at this location, and they must present their claim ticket as proof that the vehicle is theirs. The security officer will provide an escort for any patron back to their vehicle, upon request. 4 Secuni v The presence of parking valets in the valet parking areas creates what is known as a deterrent effect: criminals do not want to attempt to vandalize cars when there are parking attendants present, as there is a greater likelihood of their being caught, if seen Valets who notice anyone hanging around in the areas under their control will be ristructed to immediately summon WWBA security officers via 2-way radio. 1. Resoo_ sibility for Vehicles Ampco System Parking will be fully responsible for the safety and security of every car whose driver has left its keys with one of our parking valets. Any claimed damage or loss must be pointed out immediately to the valet on duty, who will call the manager or supervisor on duty via 2-way radio to fill out an Accident'Loss report . Ampco handles all claims directly through its regional claims administrator Once received, all claims will be handled promptly and arofessionally. To protect ourselves from false claims. our valets will be required to perform a quick "walk -around" inspection of every vehicle for which a claim check is issued, to note any previously existing damage They will mark any damage noted directly on the claim check and also point it out to t`ie driver to eliminate the possibility or misunderstandings on this important issue. This process generally takos about 10 seconds and is a quick and nearly invisible procedure. With respect to contents of the car, we ask that patrons work with us by not leasing items of obvious value in the passenger compartment, but rather, to lock Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 10 PruneYard Construction Period - Parking Plan them in the trunk, out of sight. Our attendants require only a door key and an ignition key to perform their duties. IV. Additional On -Site Parking We continue to look for additional on -site parking spaces both temporary and permanent by re -striping or reconfiguring. As an example, there is the possibility of using the loop -road in the vicinity of Tower 2 for a limited number of parallel parking spaces as the fire department will approve. The north driveways are also being studied for additional parking spaces. V. Off -Site Shuttle Service A. Service Concept A shuttle bus service will be provided to transport specified employees of Compuware and other designated office volunteers to and from the designated off -site parking lot The service will consist of a sufficient number of busses to provide a fast, efficient service to all patrons. The program is designed to accommodate up to 160 patrons per day, from the following user groups: User Grou Compuware Other Tenants Total # of Pafrons 100 60 160 'Retailers have been supportive of the lea of requiring their employees to participate in the off -site parking, but the retail employee shuttle service was not used as part of the parking demand estimate developed as a basis for this plan. We will continue to seek another location for off -site retail employee parking. B Areas of Service The primary off -site shuttle parking area will be the Campbell Community Center located approximately 1.25 miles f. the PruneYard, at the corner of Winchester and Campbell Avenues, i he shuttle bus route will be from the PruneYard on Campbell Avenue to the Community Center. Maps and instructions will be provided to shuttle riders in the Shuttle Rider Information Packet as described under Section VI "Implementation " This site has 160 regular parking spaces The site will be monitored by security during all hours of operation Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 11 PruneYard Construction Period - Parking Plan Should an alternative site become available, such as the Breuners site, we may request transferring the location. We will continue to seek another off -site location to expand the service to serve the retail employees. A single designated pick-up/drop-off point would be located in the existing curb cut adjacent to Tower 1. A section of the curb on the roadway adjacent to the office tower would be painted for "Shuttle Bus Loading/Unloading Only", allowing direct access to the office buildings, without having to drive into the parking lots. Quick delivery by Federal Express, UPS, etc. will also be allowed t.) use this area. Larger deliveries will continue to use the designated area behind Tower 2 and will be accommodated directly in front of Tower 1. One or more shuttle stops will be designated at the off -site parking area. Once the exact location at the Community Center is confirmed, these plans will be finalized. Signs will be posted to clearly identify each of the designated shuttle stops A sample of the shuttle stop signs is included as at the back of this package. Shuttle vehicles will also be clearly marked to indicate they are part of the PruneYard Shuttle Service. C. Statfinv/Hours of Operation As noted previously, the overall parking and shuttle program will be overseen by a full-time on -site manager, who will report directly to VVW&A. In this person's absence, another individual will be designated as the project supervisor, to oversee and direct the work of the parking attendants and shuttle drivers. The service will be provided from 7.00 a m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. All vehicles will need to be removed from the site by 6:00 p.m. Employees working later may move their vehicles from the off -site location to the PruneYard. D Communications Tne Manager, SupeN,-.or and each shuttle bus will have a 2-way radio to ensure prompt communication between all localions within the program. These rsd:os will be on the same frequency used by V VV&A to allow interaction with property management and security, as necessary. E. Patron Waiting Times ;shuttle bus service will run every 10 minutes during peak periods and every 15 minutes during off-peak periods. The chart on the following page shows the hour of the day, whether it is considered "peak" or 'off-peak' and the frequency of service during that time. Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 12 PruneYard Construction Period - Parking Plan Time of Da Peak or Off -Peak Frequency of Service 7:00 a.m. - 8:00 a.m. Peak every 10 minutes _ 8:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. Peak every 10 minutes 9:00 a.m. - 10:00 a.m. Off -Peak every 15 minutes 10:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. Off -Peak every 15 minutes 11:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m Peak every 10 minutes _ 12:00 p.m. - 1:00 p.m. Peak every 10 minutes 1:00 p.m. - 2:00 p.m. Off -Peak every 15 minutes 2:Ou p.m. - 3:00 p.m. Off -Peak every 15 minutes 3:00 p.m. - 4:00 p.m. Off -Peak eve 15 minutes 4:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m Peak every 10 minutes 5:00 p.m. - 5 45 p.m Peak every 10 minutes F. Secunty A uniformed security officer will be assigned to monitor the off -site lot during all operating hours. This individual will also be available to escor', passengers directly to their vehicles. Depending on the exact configuration of the off -site parking area, the shuttle driver may be able to drive passengers directly to their vehicle, during off-peak hours Shuttle drivers who notice anyone hanging around in the lot will be instructed to immediately summon 'dWV&A security officers via 2-way radio The shuttle parking lot will be lit during hours of darkness G Incentives In order to encourage patrons to voluntarily sign up for the off -site shuttle service, a number of incentives will be offered These incentives may include: • Free car wash certificates • Random 'Coffee & Danish" days • Prime Yard "Cash" Certificates • Monthly raffles The foregoing list will be further refined in the coming weeks. The intent of the program is to give us a way to offer continuous "thanks' to our patrons in exchange for the inconvenience they will bear during the construction period. This program would be open to all shuttle riders, whether Compuware, office or retail employees. Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 13 PruneYard Construction Period - Parkins Plan Some of the incentives will be available to anyone who rides the shuttle on a particular day, while others, such as the rafrles, will be open only to those who ride the shuttle a certain number of days each month. We are developing a "Frequent Rider' program which will consist of a card which is stamped by the driver every time the rider gets on the shuttle in the morning. After a pre -determined number of rides, the card is exchanged for a freebie (to be determined). The card is then entered into the drawing for that month's raffle prize. Prizes being considered include TVs, VCRs, Walkmans, and gift certificates. One of the innovative aspects of the program is the plan to issue gift certificates good only at PruneYard retailers. These will have a dollar amount indicated on them and can be used just like cash at any PruneYard retailer 'rile retailers would redeem them each month through the Management office. This program would not only reward patrons of the shuttle service, but would provide a no cost boost to the center's retailers. Participation of the PruneYard's retail merchants is requested to tlesh this idea out more fuliy. VI. Alternative Transportation A. Car Pools - Preferred parking spaces will be provided for members of car pools These spaces will be located in designated areas of Lot 9, as close as possible to Tower 1 The Santa Clara County Commuter Matching Service, RIDES, in conjunction with PruneYard Management, v. 'I handle commuter matching Commuter information can be faxed througn the PruneYard management office directly to RIDES, or information may be input through the Internet at www.rides.org. Information will be available at our upcoming Transportation Fair scheduled for early April B. Commuter Check - Employees converting from commuting by private vehicle to commuting by Santa Clara County Transit and Vanpoois (alto Light Rail, Cal Train, Bart or Ferry if used for a partial leg of a commute) will be eligible `or participation in the Commuter Check program. Under this program William Wilson & Associates issues a commuter check to the participant. The participant redeems the check towards the purchase of a ticket for public transportation at the appropriate ticket office. Vanpoolers would redeem the commuter check Iirectly with participating vanpool drivers. More information will be available at the Transportation Fair ir, April. Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 14 PruneYard Construction Period - Parking Plan C. Bicycles - Employees converting from commuting by private vehicle to commuting by bicycle will be eligible for incentives equal to the amount of commuter checks for public transportation. Additional bicycle racks will be provided in designated areas of Lot 9, where they can be seen by on -site parking personnel, during normal operating hours. Assistance with bicycle routes will be provided. VII. Transportation Fair Information on all modes of alternative transportation, including those above, telecommuting or walking will be provided at a Transportation Fair to be held in early April at the PruneYard. Representatives from Valley Transit Authority will be on -site with a vast array of information, maps and schedules. Although it is not feasible for WW&A, the Ecco Pass Program will also be represented at the fair to encourage employers to participate, both on a temporary basis during construction as well as on a permanent basis. Vill. Construction Contractor Parking There will be limited parking for construction foremen within the fenced construction area. All other construction workers must park off -site. The off -site construction parking will be locates on the dirt lot behind the electrical substation at 900 East Hamilton Avenue, the "Maxim" site. This dirt lot will be temporarily fenced and signage will be posted as appropriate. Webcor Builders, the construction contractor, has a relationship with the owners of 900 Hamilton and they are working directly with them to finalize this arrangement. The general contractor will be responsible for enforcement. Violations will be subject to $50 fines and towing Trucks entering the property from unauthorized routes will be fined $150. These financial penalties have been very successful at other properties IX. Implementation Once the Parking Plan has been approved, information will be disseminated to the tenants in the following ways A. Informational Packets. 1 Shuttle rider packet, including maps and instructions. 2. On -site parking packet, including maps and instructions. 3. Car pool rider packet, including maps and instructions, 4. County Transit rider packet, including maps and information, 5 Bicycle rider packet, including maps and information Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 15 PruneYard Construction Period - Parkin Plan B. Tenant Information Meetings C. Memos - Regular updates on any changes to timetables and other updates to the Parking Plan will be sent to all PruneYard tenants. D. Postings/Flyers: 1. Office building lobbies 2. Shuttle sites and buses E. Retail Merchants Association Meetings X. Compliance Many measures are being taken to mitigate the loss of parking during construction. The integrated plan seeks to get tenants to park off -site via the off - site shuttle program and encourages alternative methods of transportation. The plans also offers an extensive attendant -assist stacking and valet parking program. Even so, there may be some office tenants and patrons who will park in the retail parking areas. In each parking task force meeting tenants have discussed relying on the good will of all tenants to cooperate and the use of peer pressure to assure compliance. If after a period of monitoring, it is clear there is a lack of compliance, the data base parking permit program will be reconsidered with the tenants. XI. Parking Complaint Process All parking complaints should be made to the Management Office located at 1999 South Bascom Avenue, Suite 200. Telephone number (408) 3714700. Fax number (408) 371-3831 A complaint form such as the attached Exhibit C can be faxed to the complainant or the information can be taken in person or over the telephone All complaints will be logged. Each complaint requiring action will be followed up within one day or sooner A series of complaints in regard to the same attendant or shuttle bus driver will result in dismissal. The complaint process will be handled by our Tenant Administrator. The PruneYard tenants have formed their own parking committee and will appoint a parking ombudsman. Management will provide a copy of each parking complaint to the appointed ombudsman and will work with the ombudsman to resolve each one. Prepared by Ampco System Parking Page 16 The PruneYard is GRowING... PARDON OUR DUST!!! All Stores Open During Construction � THE PRUNEYARD VISITOR PARKING ONLY 2H_ac_rs-Qr—L-ess All Others, Please Enter Next Driveway I 11t 1 P:\S AMPCO SYSM. PARKING rHE PRUNEYARD Courtesy (Z� Q04 SHUTTLE OP V x3' Attendant Assist After ,*:OOpm See Security For Keys 2977 Building 12"X 12", THE PRUNEYARD. Attendant Assist Parking Upon Request Leave Keys With. Attendant 0,... I.a sr ylfliw- 1 S"X24" THE PRUNEYA" Courtesy SHUTTLE Service Provided By: Soanfpco �MG 7!x, oN 2'X2' MAGNETIC 1999 S. BASCOM AVE. S 97-20/UP 97-11 5 OF 7 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLAN. 08/2000 PRUNEYARD INN ' C..pMII, CA WILLIAY WILION • AISOCIATIS L_. j +,n . L •.M E.ec 1 i I i SECOND FLOOR PLAN A2.2 n PRUNEYARD INN C..pb.11, CA WILLIAM WILSON • ASSOCIATIS H,n THIRD FLOOR PLAN A2,3 1 PRUNEYARD INN typcol c..PM11, CA iI r 6• s� i O ! ww»n SON & ASSOCIATES O r.l,l..... )Gi-C.. i j ,pl.p.-+ i• . i I ! 26'' p.. I I I 1e..p.jI i f , room room room room type a type b type c type d 560 ..f. 560 of. 364 ..r. 564 of ly.ol 2na rlr. roan fmcal !rd flr. room net" flr room gr�una floor poroom 16 ..1. Is u 16 2 ..to 1 uM. 10 Imo- IQ ! lo' i o 0 room room room room type a type r type 9 type h 364 . f 336 ..f 457 o.f 466 or yp grnafloor room greuna flr. room orn.r .wlo imor— o.a* 7 unit. ! unn. 2 ,Nfo 6 unn. =*d-,,T.+ 7' — i e—a�— TYPICAL ROOM PLANS PRUN EYARD I I INN — Campbell, CA J1 11 y•I•J' 11I I' II 'I''1 !i'I I� II II •I•II I I I Ii I II 'I'I� .I�i-; i \ii .;.'J. �'� i� WA— ALSON &L ASSOCIATES I �I � I II � I II II I ' it �I II " ! I . � ,II i� it a II�I� � ,!� � I ;i i ' 'I I 0.�'•. liI ;, ! ,.I � 1� j I I �j ,� _ I 1 Ii I h I I, Ii, Il ; �; ► it �f � { 1 R I� i imp i r � • -- , J'I , � l ,, . , I; 1 � , � _ I� , _ �� ! n rRti, •�r� �C'I, tf t � � � !III, i I 'r I '�' ! ! l . ; �_ r { 1 , {II y { ! r. • .I II BUILDING SECTIONS & ELEVATIONS A5.1 Ex1iUO2 7}le Legendi.......o.. PRUNEYARD PLACE a.aN..1 ornc.. c..Pwll, CA WILLIAM WILSON 1 - A ASSOCIATIS `� W tl••w, View 1 View 2 te' • �1�.5�6 �� t0 0 V1w2 _ r ��y -�17 la' 19 _ : I '- ---- - 1 130 .ALL - .�sgene i i i pnmv d IRS FWLWYAIO NN . . . . . . . . . 7 . u. . .. . . . . . . . . . . i �,.-r r �sr . . . . . . . . . . . . , r _ lu i �� ; InocEOrton � :Q L Pa-tial Site Plan @ Commercial .nnf , Ilya o 0 0 "n� L1 Section; Elevation through Inn Courtyard T! 07 1J —A C JL-f SMINK Prune Yard Place Campbell. California 1999 S. BASCOM AVE. S 97-20/UP 97-11 5 OF 9 CITY OF CAMPBE�L PLAN. 12/99 Complimentary Valet.Service No Tipping Required _o < �I uL�1I 1 3nn3nv NODSVO Hinos JY [""�10 1 1 PARKING COMPLAINT FOF � 1. What Is The Nature Of The Complaint? a. Aftendant-Assist: DA MX ,.ryi.fa nr waMX s mhutef AXeM.M wf nM. _ Olner V.XkN wa Nmpee AXeXe.M ws M:.wrade Ilarnf wnnXffby lr.m'r•fN•v.XkJ. —AXM.t—kM-1 Comments: b. Shuttle Service: slum. wet MN on Xme D— pmdemf o�,. wf err _ s.Nrih w.enee .r on.,ne is _ Pw wf ofer.:rwdee _OI Comments:— C. Construction Issues' trM[ Ndf. _D _O' v Comments d. Altemative Transportation- e•rooMlv.neoM leoelemf cmXmne. cn«f 9YrytN cernmNe �� Comments: e. Other Complaints: 2. What has been done to correct the pmblem� D.I. a T.X. d Cerr.d" AcH.: The Building Management Office is located in J. NarnMCompany NemelAddress or Suite A/ 200 of the shorter office building, Tower II. anon. alra: a of compleloent. Suite Our number is (408) 374, .1�0. phone Our fax number is (408) 371-3831. 7,<., EXHIBIT C MEMORANDUM DATE: January 6, 1998 TO: Campbell City Council FROM: Pruneyard Towers Concerned Tenants SUBJECT: Upcoming Development of Pruneyard Commercial and Retail Space A. Who are we and why do we have concerns? In general, the majority of the tenants at the Pruneyard Towers are §Tall, entrepreneurisbusinesses. Their virtual livelihood is dependent on their access to their offices, convenience ax1 acouss for their customers and access for their employees. What's the problem? b' the proposed, temporary parking plan during construction ail , what are the consequences to these small businesses? For some, such as CPA's during the peak season, investment firms, etc., it can literally mean being put out of business. Of equal importance in this full employment economy, is what effect will this parkins inconvenience have on employees? It key employees find the difficulties substantial enough, they could literally seek otter employment opportunities. 'The inconveniences we are talking about could be literally the livelihood for most of the small tenants.' B. Where are tho issues coming from? If we were to generalize, we would have to point toward the attitude of Pruneyard Management. 1) Virtually no real prior notice was provided to tenants during b,e planning hearings, or at the recent City Council meetings. A few tenants received a meeting notice copy a few hours before the Planning Commission meeting. This does not constitute proper notice. Campbell City Council January 6, 1998 Page Two 2) Throughout all the meetings it has been Gear that the main goal of the management is to simply get the project approved and 'work out the problems of parkin afterwards'. Our concern is that the project not be approved until the 'problems of the parking' are worked out ahead of time. 3) Following is a short list of examples that management had not thought of prior to the recent tenant meetings. a. Off -site security had not bef n anticipated. b. Required hours for tenants who work unconventional shifts. c. Dispute between Prunevard Management's contractor and AMPCO Parking on the on -site needs ana availability for construction parking. There must be certainty that this issue is fully resoived before construction begins. If the contractor starts taking up more space, the panting model doesn't work. d. Number of parking attendants required. The application indicated they only needed two. Our assessment is that the parking plan cannot work without a minimum of six to ten attendants. e. The off -site Parkin arrangements have not been finalized, and the tenant required to participate in this element has not finalized its agreement. This is a key item in the overall plan working. A sub -set of this issue deals with the question of how you can control the tenant who is supposed to park off -site. They have described an elaborate computer system that will keep track of license plate numbers. Many of the tenants have refused to provide this information, and the key point is if tenants who are supposed to park off -site, park here at the Pruneyard, and there is no parking for the other tenants, Lhen what are you going to do? f. City Council tenant meeting requirement. In general, the only thing that was discussed at the tenant meetings was how the AMPCO parking system was going to work. The AMPCO system is going to handle approximately 150 cars. That is 22% of the Parking Problem for Towers tenants. We are interested in the other 781/6 of the problem which they were unwilling to properly outline. In general, during the tenant Campbell City Council January 6, 1998 Page Three meetings numerous questions were asked and we requested that these questions be written down with appropriate answers given to the tenants prior to the City Council meeting We were told that the questions and answers could not be provided us until after the City Council meeting. We feel that all of the issues should be explored, questions should be outlined and answers provided to demonstrate that the management system understands the enormity of the probl,�m, the complexity of the problem and, in fact, has a solid grasp on how V:my are going to solve it. :i A critical issue that was raised is what are they going to do if the system flails, if a tenant drives in here and there is no parking left because they made a mistake? It was openly admitted they have no backup system. To us, this is an integral part of approving this project. By every analysis, their model is'maxed out*. All you need is a holiday when most adults are working and the theater is having a first -run movie and there won't be parking here for the business tenants. There are lots of other examples of increased reeds that have not been taken into consideration. Having no backup system during construction with the parting numbers so tight is unacceptable. 5) The final item in this heading deals with the general discussion that the Towers Management has experience up the Peninsula in this type of problem. After further investigation, it was Gear that they had not done a combination retail and office space project and handled parking problems during construction. To us this is a critical difference. You cannot control the crowd needs of the retail user. The restaurants alone at different times of the day consume an enormous amount of the office parking spaces. Please keep in mind that soon after the first of the year, another restaurant will o ern at the Prunevard. The City's traffic studies were done back appoximately a year ago and the Pruneyard Towers management studies were updated in September. Every one of the tenants who has looked at the numbers will tell you that they don't think they work It clearly depends on the hours of the day that you did the study. There is an enormous difference in avai!able parking between 8:30 , 10:30 , 12 00, 3:30 and 5:00 o'clock Obviarsly, the study needs to take into consideration the worst case need, not the average. Campbell City Council January 6, 1998 Page Four C. What is the reauest7 The request follows the aforementioned information. We are rot against the croiect. We are against the project moving ahead without a comprehensive analysis and thoroughly thought out, properly managed parking program that is going to work for everyone. Property management says there has to be some inconvenience. Waiting for a car five minutes, not a problem. Having employees drive around for an extra five minutes or so to park, not a problem. Having employees spend an extra five minutes getting in and out three times a day, not a problem. If the system fails, it has ;evc -e consequences to the people here at the Towers. It was absolutely clear to us that management had not completed a thorough analysis of the workability of this plan and that must ocsr before the Droiect is approve. In essence, our request is that there be a thorough review of the traffic numbers and that a comprehensive outline of what all the questions and issues are be presented to the City Council so that they are confident that the program is in place that will work for the tenants at the Pruneyard Towers and not simply be something that will be 'worked out afterwards'. If this project is approved now, problems like 'there is no place to mark' won't get solved for months, if at all, during the construction period. D. Conditions Assuming the City Council implemerIs a thorough review of all of the aforementioned issues and is totally satisfied that management has developed a plan that is workable and wiJ not bankrupt small tenants, we feel that the building permit should be conditioned, at a minimum, on the fo'lowing. These conditions must have severe oonsea ences or they will be meaningless, 1) There will be a parking place at any time somewhere in the Tower area for all tenants and their customers. 2) In the event the system fails in any way, there will be a backup emergency systam. At a minimum, an off -site location will be utilized directing tenants and customers to ensure this failsafe feature. Campbell City Councill January 6 1998 Page Five 3) A general agreement must be arrived at that tenants will not have to wait any longer than fiv� for their car. This is the time offered by management. 4) Security is a key element of this program. On and off -site parking must Provide round theclodc security.This includes weather condition considerations, Proper lighting and the constant presence of visible security, especially for female employees. Please keep in mind that num9rous tenants have female employees working late night shifts at the Pruneyard. 5) Clearly, we are concerned about emergency vehicle access, handicapped parking, etc. E. Problem resolution communication and consequences There must be an established procedure for ton2nts to communicate to management about breakdowns, and be assured there will be many. There must be an effective, measurable system that management is accountable for in implementing quick solutions to new problems discovered. The final and most important element is that management must have Mnseauences if they don't meet the terms and conditions of their agreements. As originally stated, we are not against tho project. We simply want management to take into consideration the maximum amount of input before they develop the final plan, have the plan tested to ensue its workability with substantial safety marains and failsafe §ystems for failures. The final request is that the protect not be approved until this model is in place and has been tested and proven to ensure tenants the financial gain of the developer does not mean the financial n,in of the tenant. December 23, 1997 Mr. Tim J. Haley RECEIVED Associate Planner, Community Development Department City of Campbell 017C 2 3 1997 City Hall CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 N. First Street PLANNING DEPT. Campbell, Ca. 95008 RE: Notice for Documents regarding the Pruneyard Complex from 1993 - Present (Note: Hand delivered to Planning Department's office on 12/23197) Mr. Haley, Thank you for the information you provided with regard to the Planning Commission meeting minutes from November 11, 1997. However, I noticed that in the package you provided, that I was missing some pages of the documents. In particular, the following was missing and I will need copies of these pages: Pages 1-10 of ine November 11, 1997 Planning Commission Meeting minutes Pages 20-24 and 26-29 of the Traffic Analysis written by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers I am now requesting copies of any and all documents and correspondence that the Planning Commission has with regard to the Pruneyard Complex located at 1875 S. Bascom Avenue or 1999 S. Bascom Avenue in Campbell. This would be inclusive o1 the following Years: 1993-Present, Please insure that whomever in your office completes this task, that all documents are copied in their entirety. I am reauestinq that all of the above listed information be completed as soon as possible. Please contact me at my home Rhone number (408) 378-4550 as soon ajA is available and I will come to your office for nick up In any event. at the very latest I need this information by Tuesday. December 30, 1998, Sincerely, �k �j , ' -- William W. Stroup �' 909 Capri Drive Campbell, Ca. 95008 Phone number: (408) 378-4550 December 23, 1997 Mr. Steve Piasecki RECEIVED Community Development Director, City of Campbell City Hall 2 3 1997 70 N. First Street CITY OF C Campbell, Ca. 95008 CITY OF pEpTLL HE: Notice for Planning Commission Hearings regarding the Pruneyard Complex (Ncte: Hand delivered to Planning Commission office on 12123/97) Mr. Piasecki, Pursuant to Chapter 21.78.020 (4.) of the "PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE PROCEDURES" from Campbell City Ordinance 1617, 1 am requesting notification of any Planning Commission hearings relating to any and all matters concerning the Pruneyard Complex located at 1875 S. Bascom Avenue or 1999 S. Bascom Avenue. My residence and mailing address is as follows William W. Stroup 909 Capri Drive Campbell, Ca. 95008 Sir}Cer William W. Stroup b. Betty Deal appeared before the City Council on behalf of the Chamber of Commerce to expno.ss appreciation to the City Council for their support of Chamber activities througlxrit the past year. Ms. Deal presented the Mayor and Vice Mayor with copies of the recently issued Campbellopoly Game. 12. Directing the Community Development Director to Proceed with Abatement of Weeds (Resolution/Ro0 Call Vote) (Continued 111181" This is the time and place for a continued public hearing to hear objections from property owners regarding the proposed removal of weeds. Associate Planner Haley - Staff Report dated December g, 1997. Mayor Watson declared the public hearing open and asked if anyone in the audience wished to be beard. There being no one wishing to speak, Mayor Watson closed the public bearing. M/S: Furtado/Dougherty - to adopt Resolution 9312 directing the Community Development Director to proceed witL the abatement of weeds. Motion adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Co.mcilmembers: Conant, Furtado, Dougherty, Dean, Watson NJES: Councilmembers: Now 13. Application of David Word, on behalf of William Wilson and Associates, for approval of a Special Development Permit (SDP 97-01) and Site and Architectural Approval (S 97-20) to allow the construction of a six story, 130,000 square foot office building and afour-level parking garage on property located at 1999 S. Bascom Avenue In a C-2-0 (General Commercial/Overlay) Zoning District and Approval of a Conditional Use Permit (UP 97-11) to allow a S4-room bold expansion on property located at 187S S. Bascom Avenue in a C-2s (General Commercial) Zoning District (Resolution/RoU Call Vote) Councilmember Dean stated be would not be participating on this item due to a conflict of interest, and left the Council Chamber. This is the time and place for a public hearing to consider the application of David Word, on behalf of William Wilson and Associates, for approval of a Special Development Permit (SDP 97-01) and Site and Architectural Approval (S 97-20) tc allow the construction of a six story, 130,000 square foot office building and a four - level parking garage on property located at 1999 S. Bascom Avenue in a C-2-0 (General Commercial/Overlay) Zoning District. Minute of t2/817/ City Council Meeting Planner 11 Sciara - Staff Report dated December 8, 1997 Mayor Watson deciared the public hearing open and asked if anyone in the audience wished to be heard. David Word, Pruneyard Associates, LLC. 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 200, Campbell, Applicant, appeared before the City Council and spoke in support of the application. Mr. Word discussed concerns regarding certain conditions of approval relating to building materials, creek trail access, security issues, and Campisi Way contribution Nick Siersema, a tenant in the Pruneyard Tower, appeared before the City Council and expressed concerns regarding parking while the parking garage is being consvtrcted, and asked whether the applicant had addressed this issue. David Word, Applicant, appeared before the City Council and responded to the speaker's concerns. Jennifer Filzen, 1845 S. Bascom Avenue /35B, Campbell, appeared before the City Council and expressed concerns about the impact this development will have on the tenants of the Aloha Apartment complex including noise during construction and the loss of privacy and parking spaces if the extension to Campisi Way moves forward. Community Development Director Piacecki responded to the speaker's comments regarding the CuWisi Way extension. David Finch, Tenant of the Pruneyard Towers, appeared before the City Council and asked what the applicant will do to mitigate parking problems that will result during construction. Don Hebard, 205 Calado Avenue, Campbell, appeared before the City Council and expressed concerns regarding the creek trail access. David Word, Applicant, appeared before the City Council and responded to cmerns raised by the speakers regarding the parking garage, noise, and an interim parking plan during construction. There being no one else wishing to be beard, Mayor Watson closed the public hearing. City Council Discussion: Councilmember Dougherty expressed concerns regarding the parking garage and opening the access on the bottom level, and cor.:erns about creek tf..@ access stating that he would prefer access through the northern end of the property. Minato of 1218M Ctty Council Mccft Vice Mayor Furtado expressed concerns regarding safety, and parking and traffic impacts. Councilmember Furtado stated that the issue of the Campisi Way extension should be studied further as it would be one solution to help mitigate traffic in the long run. Councilmember Conant expressed concerns regarding the issues of creek trail access and safety, and adequate parking during the day. Councilmember Conant further suited that traffic is going to be further impacted and the Campisi Way extension is an important consideration. Mayor Watson stated that it appears there are some items that still need to be resolved and recommended that the public hearing be continued until January so that staff and the applicant can address the issues discussed this evening including: meeting with the Toaer tenants to address concerns raised regarding an interim parking plan, creek trail access, and further , rdy and discussion of issues associated with the Campisi Way extension. It was the consensus of the City Council that the issue of building materials did not need to be referred back to the Planning Commission. Public Works Director Kass responded to questions of the City Council regarding the timeline and potential funding sources for the Campisi Way extension. City Manager Strojny stated that staff will proceed with the Council's diraxion to meet with the applicant to address the issues of creek trail access and the Campisi Way mitigation program taking into consideration other projects that might be coming forward and the overall CIP Program to comprehensively address how the Campisi Way extension might be funded in the not too distant future should the City Council choose to move ahead with this project in an earlier time frame. In addition to meeting with the tenants, Councilmember Comm recommended that the applicant meet with the tenants of the Aloha Apartments to address the concerns that were discussed earlier in the public hearing. Mayor Watson reopened the public hearing. MIS: Dougherty/Furtado - to continue to the January 6, IM City Counra Meeting. Motion adopted by a 4-0-0-1 vote, Councilmember Dean abstaining. Councilmember Dean returned to the Council Chamber. UNFINISHED BUSWESS Them were no agendized items. Mioutes of 12/8/97 City Council Meeting FILE No. 607 12,08 '97 11:36 ID:HUtT 8 usSOCINTES dp:- HUNT 6 ASSOCIATES INSURANCE SERVICE, INC. 1999 S. BASCOM AVE., SUITE #500 CAMPBELL, CA 95M Telephone: 4OW371-2810 FAX.4081371-6467 DATE: December B, 1997 TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (including cover sheet) TO Gloria Scisre 4 COMPANY. Campbell Planning Department FROM: P. Michael Hunt SUBJECT: Pr neyard Parking Just a role as follow-up to our recent discussions in regard to the Pruneyard and parking situation. First. IN na again express my persyal appreciation for your assistance and cooperation. I really have the she," thet you ward to do the right thing and that the issues I have raised need aorta typo of uVerdion. I he" taken uo liberty to attach a copy of my Niter to the Pruneyard Mainepanrent. end as 1 indicated to you by Phone, the main issue for me to be it xtudad n the conditions u limply the maxaman of time they are allowed to make a tenent (owrer and employe") wart for his car. My suggestion is a maximum of tan minutes. All of the analyses and all of the traffic studies are on attempt to cone up with a formula that is reasonable and socaptable. I would Ike to part at the other end and have the condition be maximum ten minutest Then it is the management's responsibility to accomplish the task of achieving the ten mines. If this can be accomplished with three valet parking attendants or thirty, it realty doesn't matter — they simply must accomplish the staled condition. I will follow up with you in the corning weeks. Again, thank you for your attention to this natter. PMH:vks Enclosure NOTE: If you do not receive papas noted above, please call as soon as possible. FILE No. 607 12,08 '97 lt:36 ID:MINT & ASSOCIATES 408 PAGE 2 November 17, 1997 virgirve Unruh Building Manager pny»yard Towers 1999 So. Bascom Ave., 0200 Campbell. CA 950M Dew ells. Unruh: As a WDOwUP to my anandan>ca «lf1° recent Plervvrq Commission meeting. I warted to address some points of dardic"On. comet _" at the Planning Commission meeting, I was As yvi an tell from my , w unnaril in eC 1 would think somewhat surprised to dscovar 7wt 1 was the 20h - a as for fuss mat of the terwnta wA0d have a great deal of i"rest in what your Plan is oval in B+s future any 00w plrrrrni g Commission or City Padma-laft. my hope g Wjvlv"approvals would indude notification to the tarwnts so stay would have adequate furores to address Gwir conams. As I said to the Planning Comml�sion, Via tarwr" are really the orwa who pay the tauwa, tiffs mortgage payments, stc., and t think we should raw some interest in what heppwm 10 our fealty. The following is a very general °'•ruins of what my rnderstandkp is, and A tow of the questions eve I think need to be . the 9ef1Bfal, it Is my understanding that you are row intending to proceed �May carnWdion d the olna tower and the parking garage st, to ininne. recall. I was informed OW the garage was to be a,lD first to rrvnirrvze the irtnpact on for 1ldatin I tansia Town the ofDoe totter would be constructed. allowing parMM tealty as a ba Monet conoW to minimize knead and to at retaileUs*dd sturb�a p . rnl,, of aor,r.., Is p41 �. dai; parkingtedity and eatirrwte the disruption that will probe" tow parking tlnst Paring Garage and o fia building, as well a conservative estimale an my Part r>•una a $[ LttDi log arse for constructions, coater than this. . in fad, It mat be Goa FILE. No. 607 12'08 '97 11:37 ID:HNT & ASSOCINTES 408 PAGE 3 Virginis Unruh Novonber 17, 1997 Papa Two I 1 III you plan on axmtks,V to pro nde pw" for customers between the two towers, in parlurg space OvOilAbIO for essence we wilt have less than 20% or 0 Of VO current np i YOU Intend to take ten.rmts it into Mk RNI 01V It does rm-in mo owkxtG is .vail.blm and comport ee...e.curs-a-.:.�....:..cr�r,,..-.s�.-u+e•,..-.c.v>.:w.,Mv.o...•.:,.,r,.=.�•..-_"-___ ,r�,y�,,•��,sr-:.7ai�. r_,..,,�..,�-�,z•:rvau:t;.�:Lei••�;.�ati��.s++.?a+4�:�'l::wiaafeer_-x�.n�Sr.7�wa�6+a�ara:f r�Rh tenants. Veld paf'0 wig necessitate 11Wr2ears off M. It is lurtha my unoerueriormg that you we Q wV to provide a lhsAftiza to sown undisclosed PWWng fWIdY Off sitis for employes•. To say that all d this is a bit disturbing is an understatement. Hen We a few of the questions. end I em sun there will be more. 1) If you intend to use valet parking. how do you intend to holds Me peak hours when wyMer• frGm 600 to 1.000 termants are pONrp tO Corte Nino Prurnyerd9 This will be Y0.l""it is conceivable that people could take 20 to 30 minutes pacing to Ite voW pm rW V filic" s1 C»se rush hours. This ck tY its unmoaptan � ddo the warn to he" my Prureyard just for pON119• 2) 1 would assume tom you want to continue to Use the parking between the two towers for visit= end customers. Clearly it will be vary difficult for you to determine who is a visitor and who is is lyvV employee who simply wants to park for cornenW"— I would be curious how you pier to decipher Bns. 3) When u valet fa ��eno>t.ndd 7 eIn nd i� words, an You daily), how arm You sting poing to tract my iautortmen a map and ImN ahem to po to an oft ells p.rWnp locatlon end well for Ne shuttle bur to «ern in to do business with ms9 4) N you mey recall, I expressed a concur et the Planning Commission mOMM in rogrd to emir►ty in general- In Wftular, I am very colow rnd about what the seaeNy fedibp will be on the off sit• oKhM. Many d" tenants he" female •mpioyees who work We into ew evening and N would not be .a:eptable W $'OOY provide the seaXdy as in a bus driver dropping them off in is parkng area. FILE No. W7 12,08 '97 11:37 ID:RWT 8 ASSOCIATES 408 PAYE 4 Virginia Unruh Novamber 17, 1997 Pape Three f S) Of pwbculr corncam to me is Vre fact that I fraquGdy roved to run from my oft site Wresting• back to Vre oAioa to pick up Is Proposal and Again, valet Parking and off site raquW*rrwrts related to this concept, it how are You going to famlitess tenants wtno need to he"short stays in r officesu s would be WMO@ptaW for MR to haw a velet parking delay of twenty to thirty minutes when all 1 need is two or VW" mim toe to go into"&rM and pick up a file. Needless to say, blare are many u wwared q numerous foctr• that 1 oink you need to t*A into consideration when Impyour acting yarrard larwntr In tttis �.••.,eed for almost a war. dramatic way, keeping in mind that - I room* Ve market and to gerrrsl economy is so strong Viet small tenants such as myself could am" be toe to go find another buikine Ve g. Bacausdemand Is so threat. you definitely haw Vts upper herd. As a tenant here in the Pnxreyerd celebrating our 2if year, I would hope Vet NVlllhm ",,on does not inland to deal with us in this mararer. Given the magnitude of Vtrea potentlel impacts on tenants. I don't know whether Or not are Ptah so . type of �s jgj To date I hew rot than the time to YOUreview my lease or have an somM review it for Wre to dsten — what rights 1 haw as e tenant. My tope is Vat we could work togettar on a friendly basis to resolve those various issues. My suggestion is to lave some tenant workshops in tM coming weeks to address our concerns and to assist us in better understanding how Your Plans will ailed our businesses Sincerely, /sv P. Mkheel Hunt PMH:vke OF o�M � u � ITEM NO. 13 CITY OF CAMPBELL Community Development Department Date: '. .,ember 8, 1997 To: Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers From: Steve Piasecki, Community Development Director Re: Revised Findings - Pruneyard Attached is some additional language to clarify Findings number 15 and 17 as recommended by the City Attorney. The proposed clarifying language appears in bolded italics. Thank you. I 70 North First Strert Campben. California 99000.0433 tit 406.666.2140 w 406.666.6301 - t00 608.866.2790 A-7 Citv Council Resolution SDP 97-01/S 97-20 1999 S. Bascom Avenue Pruneyard 9. The traffic study prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan indicates that the proposed office development will generate 1,711 vehicle trips per day during weekdays. 10. The existing development on the property consists of movie theaters, retail, office, and hotel uses. The proposed development is consistent with the existing uses on the property with adjacent land uses, subject to the conditions of approval. 11. The Circulation Element of the Campbell General Plan identifies the extension of Campisi Way as an improvement the City's circulation system. 12. The purpose of the Campisi Extension is to provide direct access to the Pruneyard by allowing traffic from Highway 17 and Hamilton Avenue west of Highway 17 to bypass Bascom Avenue. 13. The Campisi Extension is identified in the Circulation Element as a necessary circulation improvement to the Hamilton and Bascom commercial district area. 14. City traffic engineering estimates conclude that the extension of Campisi Way will result in the following: • Eliminates 252 northbound left turns at the Hamilton/Bascom intersection doing the PM peak hour. • Reduces the PM peak hour delays at the Hamilton/Bascom intersection eight seconds below existing conditions. • Approximately 5,860 vehicles per day generated by the Pruneyard would use the extension. • 'rraffic utilizing the extension would almost exclusively have an origin or destination at the Pruneyard. • Reduces travel time to and from the Pruneyard and both Highway 17 and Hamilton Avenue west of Highway 17. • Increases the amount of unused capacity at the Hamilton/Bascom intersection. • Has a positive impact on congestion in the vicinity of the Pruneyard. • Would off -set the project's traffic impacts that travel between the Pruneyard and both Highway 17 and locations on Hamilton Avenue west of Highway 17. 15. 11e developer will be required to contribute a $600,000 share of the private costs of construction to extend Campisi Way as a condition of approval. There is a reasonl relationship between the amount of the contribution and the cost of the Camptsi Way extension in that the project site would be the primary beneficiary of the extension and the amount of the fee is only approximately half of the cost of the a dension. City Council- Resolution SDP 97-Ol/S 97-20 - 1999 S. Bascom Avenue - Pmney,id Paee 3 16. The costs of construction to extend Campisi Way includes design/engineering, land acquisition, severance costs, construction, and demolition of structures at the Aloha Apartments necessary to accommodate the roadway. 17. The contribution of S600,000 for a share of the costs to construct the extension of Campisi Way to the Pruneyard property is roughly nroportional and reasonably related to the projects impacts in that the Pruneyard would be the primary beneficiary of the extension and the amount of the fee is only approximately half of the cost of the extension. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the contribution and the type of development project being proposed in that the extension of Campisi Way would off --set the traffic impacts identified for this type of project. Tin a is a reasonable relationship between the need for the Campisi Way extension and the type of development being proposed in that the project will generate 1,711 vehicle trips per day during weekdays which would impact already congested City streets and Campisi Way would mitigate this impact. 18. Subsequent developments in the Hamilton and Bascom commercial district will be required to share in the costs of constructing the Campisi Way extension if the proiects generate traffic that would pass through Hamilton/Bascom intersection. 19. The proposed use of the pre-cut concrete material on the facade of the new office tower has not been demonstrated to be consistent or architecturally compatible with the other building materials or paving treatments or buildings within the Pruneyard. 20. The proposed light green paint color on the roof on the elevator tower of the parking garage and on the roof screen of the new office tower is not compatible with the building colors of the proposed office tower. 21. The conditions of approval require details and revisions to the proposed building materials and paint colors so that they are architecturally compatible with the existing and proposed development. 22 The proposed parking garage is highly visible from Highway 17. 23. The proximity of the garage to the western property line does not allow the installation of sufficient landscaping to adequately screen the parking garage from Highway 17. 24. Existing off -site landscaping within the Caltrans right-of-way adjacent to the western property line is not sufficient to screen the proposed parking garage or the property from Highway 17. City LJ Council Item No: Category: Public Hearing Report Meeting Date: December 8, 1997 TITLE Approval of a Special Development Permit and a Site and Architectural Permit to allow the Construction of a 130,000 square foot Office Building and Parking Garage — 1999 S. Bascom Ave. -- Application of Mr. David Word on behalf of William Wilson and Associates -- SDP 97-Ol/S 97-20 RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following actions: 1. Grant a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed project; and 2. Adopt a Resolution, approving a Special Development Permit, and a Site and Architectural permit, subject to the conditions of approval. BACKGROUND Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is requesting approval of a Special Development Permit and a Site and Architectural Approval to construct a 130,000 gross square foot, six -story office building between the two existing office towers, a four level parking garage structure containing 730 parking spaces at the northwest corner of the property, and the continuation of shared on -site parking facilities. Project Backeround: The Pruneyard is a mixed -use development located at the northwest comer of Bascom Avenue and Campbell Avenue. The 27.2 acre property consists of two high-rise office towers, movie theaters, and a retail shopping center that was developed in the early 1970's. the Pruneyard Inn was developed in 1989. A major remodel of the shopping center was completed in 1996 by use current owners, William Wilson and Associates, that included two new single use pad buildings, facade and site modifications, and additional landscaping. In addition to the Special Development Permit, the applicant submitted a conditional use permit requesting approval of a 54-room expansion of the Pruneyard Inn, and a Site and Architectural permit for the proposed design. On November 11, 1997, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 3135 approving the applicant's request to expand the hotel use. ANALYSIS General Plan Consistency: The General Plan land Use designation is commercial. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan designation. City Council Report - December 8, 1997 SDP 97-01 and S 97-2C 1999 S. Bascom Avenue Zoning Consistency: The western half of the property containing the office development is zoned C-2-0 (General Commercial/Overlay). The Overlay zone allowed a "high rise" concept for the existing office buildings. Subject to the approval of the Special Development Permit for the new construction within the Overlay zone, the project is consistent with the zoning of the property. Campisi Way Extension: The Circulation Element identifies the extension of Campisi Way as a necessary improvement to the circulation system within the Bascom Hamilton commercial area. Consequently, the Planning Commission staff report recommended that the applicant share in the cost of extending Campisi Way. The amount of the contribution was not resolved prior to the Planning Commission meeting, therefore, a Condition of Approval No. 19 B (page 9 of PC Resolution 3143) was worded requiring the developer to contribute a "proportional share" of the costs to extend Campisi Way. Staff indicated to the Planning Commission that the amount of the contribution was anticipated to be resolved prior to the City Council meeting. Staff has obtained preliminary estimates for extending Campisi Way, and is able to recommend an amount after evaluating the benefits of the extension of Campisi Way: In summary, the Pruneyard is the primary beneficiary of the extension by: • The creation of a direct north/south connection to the Pruneyard. • The redistribution of traffic (from Bascom and Hamilton) having an origin or destination from the Pruneyard to the Campisi Way extension. Based on the direct benefits of the extension to the Pruneyard, staff recommends that the applicant be required to contribute 5600,000.00 as a Condition of Approval towards the cost of constructing the Campisi Way extension 'Ttas figure represents approximately 50% of the private costs for constructing the extension. Construction costs include design/engineering, land acquisition, severance costs, construction and demolition of structures at the Aloha Apartments necessary to accommodate the roadway. Private costs do not include the costs for constructing the first 100 feet of the extension identified in the City's Capital Improvement Program. The amount of the contribution, per staffs recommendation, is in indicated in italics in Condition of Approval number 19 (B) of the Draft City Councii Resolution. Plannin¢ Commission Action: At its meeting of November 11, 1997. the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 3134 recommending approval of the Special Development Permit, subject to the deletion of two conditions of approval. The two conditions that the Commission did not support included: • The installation of an infrared security system on all levels of the parking garage, along the proposed Creek Trail access, and a continuos monitoring station. City Council Report — Dmember 8, 1997 SDP 97-01 and S 97-20 — 1999 S. Bascom Avenue Paee -3- The recordation of a covenant obligating existing and future property owners to remove or remove graffiti within seven days after its application or seven days after notification is provided by the City. ALTERNATIVES 1. Deny the Special Development Permit. 2. Modify the Special Development Permit with additional conditions of approval as deemed necessary. 3. Continue the request for further review. FISCAL IMPACTS The office tenant for the proposed office building, Compuware, may generate sales tax revenues. The amount of revenue is not known at this time. Attachments: 1. Draft City Council Resolution for Approval of the Special Development Permit. 2. Planning Commission Resolution 3134 3. Planning Commission Minutes dated November 11, 1997 4. Planning Commission Staff Report dated November 11, 1997 5. Expanded Initial Study and Mit •ation Monitoring Program 6. Reduced Exhibits Prepared by: Gloria Sciara, Planner 11 Reviewed by:: ' `--L� .do, Steve Piasecki, Community Development Director Approved by: Bernard Strojny, City Manager 1 w vF-C1At CITY OF CAMPBELL Community Development Department November 19, 1997 David Word, Vice -President William Wilson & Associates 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 200 Campbell, CA 95008 FAX (408) 371-3831 Re: Side Agreement a ,r On -site Improvements at The Pruneyard Shopping Center Dear David; During the recent remodel of the Pruneyard Shopping Center, several of the site improvements where postponed due to project related budget constraints. You have requested that these site improvements not be part of the conditions of approval for the new office building and hotel expansion but instead be handled as a side agreement. We have agreed to clarify in writing the precise improvements that will be installed as part of this agreement. The following reiterates the improvements and with your .signature below. this letter will serve as the side agreement: I. Relocate the north -south to east -west driveway aisle in the southeast comer of the center next to the Bank of America building. This modification will remove aFproximately four (4) parking spaces at the end of the parking aisle across from Bank of America to shift the drive to the northwest, resulting in a more gradual turn instead of the right-angled "L-shaped" drive that currently exists. This change should smooth traffic Flow around this area and avoid conflicts with cars backing out of the Bank of America parking spaces into the travel lanes of the driveway aisle. 2. Provide landscape islands and tree wells at the end of the parking aisles and midway along the parking aisles located in front of the Barnes and Noble bookstore and Johnny Rockets restaurant. The landscape improvements shall include large canopy shade trees (24-inch box size), ground cover and irrigation. 3. Install up to six (6) trees and/or other landscaping materials within the existing planter area adjacent to the north and south sides of the large freestanding shopping center sign located on Bascom Avenue. These materials are intended to shield the base of the sign. 7o North Ftnt Street Gmpb-01. Calllornr 95008 1473 nL 404 466 2140 rat 408 866 8341 rot 408. 666. 2790 0 Side Agreement for 0i e Improvements at The Primeyard St ,zing Center November 19, 1997 Page 2 4. Install six (6) trees in tree -wells within the walkway along the south elevation of the Hollywood Video store and Barbeques Galore retail area to create a shaded walkway on this south elevation. 5. Modify the bus shelters on Bascom Avenue and Campbell Avenue to incorporate architectural features of the Pruneyard shopping center, record an easement area and construct a concrete pad behind the sidewalk on Bascom Avenue and relocate the Bascom Avenue bus shelter clear of the sidewalk and onto the Pruneyard property within the easement area. 6. Add special paving treatment such as scored concrete or concrete pavers in the center main street drive between the two plazas from the elevator towers to the Patrick James store. The pavement enhancements were originally intended to off -set the loss of the courtyard/gazebo and will enhance this area for community events such as the Prune Festival. William Wilson and Associates will develop plans for the improvements concurrently with the detailed landscaping plans developed for the office improvements. The plans will be submitted to the Community Development Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits for the office building. Installation of the improvements will occur in conjunction with the other landscape improvements and will be completed prior to the certificate of occupancy for the office development. Please sign this letter below which shall serve as acceptance of the above conditions as a side agreement. If you should have any questions regarding this or any other matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at (408) 866-2140. Sinc ly, n Ste a Ptasec i 1 Community Development Director cc: Jeanne Shook-Arterberry, CPM, William Wilson & Associates Bemie Strojny, City Manager l representing William Wilson and Associates, hereby agree to the install improvements to the Pruneyard Shopping Center, as detailed above. Mr. David Word, Vice President Date: William Wilson and Associates Santa GoraVo eg Woter District 5750 ALMADEN E%PRE SSWAY SAN JOSE. CA 95118-3686 TELEPHONE (408) 265w2600 FACSIMILE (408) 266-0271 ♦" AFFInuATivt 1C 01 EIPLl)VEP November 19, 1997 Ms. Gloria Sciara City of Campbell 0 i cny 70 North First Street Campbell, CA 95008 o" CA p,` &ANN/NZL( Uc Dear Ms. Sciars: Subject: Pruneyard Place Sam Clara Valley Water District (District) staff have reviewed the Expanded Initial Study (Initial Study) for the subject project. 1. We with to clarify the issues of storm water permitting discussed on page 10. As is stated in the Initial Study, the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program (Program) —formerly (mown as the Santa Clara Valley Nonpoint Source Program —was developed to assist the municipalities in the Sam Clan Valley, the County of Santa Clan, and the District implement the Clean Water Act. Inter, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board issued a Municipal Storm Water NPDFS Permit to these copermium; the Program assists the ropermittees in implementing the provisions of their permit. Note that there are two distinct NPDES storm water permits: construction activities (with which the ov:ner of the property under construction mast comply) and municipal (with which the City of Campbell JCityl and the District must comply). Under the provisions of the Municipal Storm Water NPDES Permit, the City and the District are required to take steps within their areas of authority to reduce or eliminate pollutant in storm water to the maximum extent practicable. 2. Consistency with the Program is discussed on page 10. However, it is stated that 'iriunoff-borne pollution and associated impacts will increase ... after construction of future development on the site." This issue is not addressed. Since control of pollutant resulting from new and redevelopment are an element of the Municipal Storm Water NPDES Permit, consistency would require that post -construction impacts be addressed in addition to the construction impacts. This project provides an opportunity to include measures, such as vegetated swa:es, to control the polkam in parking lot and other storm water runoff. Additional information and suggestions may be found in the Panting Lot BMP Manual produced by the Program. Recommendations for site designs that reduces storm water pollution are presented in the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association's Start at the Source. Both of these are available from the City's urban runoff coordinator or from the Program, (11M) 794-2482. 3. On page 11, the General Permit that is required is the NPDES Storm Wate: Permit for Conaructicn Activities. 0 —ewe P.W r � Ms. Gloria Sciarn 2 November 19, 1997 4. to Section H, Hydrology, page 42, compliance with the NPDES Storm Water Permit for Construction Activities a discussed. It may be noted that proper implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan depends upon monitoring of the installation and the ability to respond quickly to correct deficiencies in the installation. 71ank you for the opportunity to review the Initial Study for this project. If you have any comments or questions, phase write me or call me at (408) 265-2607, extension 2259. Sincerely, 1IIA -{ / William C. Springer, P. Associate Civil Engineer Community Projects Review Unit s i i i r k I CITY of CAMPBELL Community Development Department Current Planning November 14, 1997 Mr. David Word William Wilson & Associates 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 200 Campbell, CA 95008 Re: SDP 97-Ol/S 97-20/UP 97-11-1875 & 1999 S. Bascom Avenue -The Pruneyard Dew Mr. Word: Please be advised that the Planning Commission, at its meeting of November 11, 1997, adopted Resolution No. 3134 recommending approval of a Special Development Permit to allow the construction of a six -story, 130,000 square foot office building and a four - level parking garage on the above reference property and adopted Resolution 3135 approving a Conditional Use Permit to allow the 54-room expansion of the Pruneyard Inn. The Special Development Permit will be considered by the City Council at its meeting of Monday, December 8, 1997. If you have any questions regarding the Commission's action, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (408) 866-2144. Sincerely, {n Gloria Sciara Planner 11 cc: Mr. Ron McLester and Mr. Charles Missler (Architects) Homberger & Worstell 170 Maiden Lane San Francisco, CA 94108 70 North Fbn li r Ctayhell. CS 919004 1421 lU 400.//4. 1140 W 40a.1116 alal , no ao, a117790 \ ia. RESOLUTION NO.3134 BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (SDP 97-01) AND SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL (S 97-20) TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SIX -STORY, 130,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING AND A FOUR -LEVEL PARKING GARAGE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1"9 S. BASCOM AVENUE IN A C-2-0 (GENERAL COMMERCIALIOVERLAY) ZONING DISTRICT. APPLICATION OF MR. DAVID WORD, ON BEHALF OF WILLIAM WILSON & ASSOCIATES. FILE NO. SDP 97-Ol/S 97-20. After notification and public hearing, as specified by law, and after presentation by the Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed After due consideration of all evidence presented, the Planning Commission finds as follows with respect to application SDP 97-Ol/S 97-20: 1. A Special Development Permit and Site and Architectural Permit propose the construction of one 130,000 gross square foot, six -story office building, and a four level parking garage containing 730 parking spaces on the western side of the project site. 2. The Conditional Use Permit application proposes a 54 room expansion to the Pruneyard Inn. 3. The proposed develolment applications, as conditioned, arc consistent with the General Plan and Zoning designations which indicate a Commercial land uses for this property. 4. The proposed landscape plan and site amenities will improve the appearance of the proposed project. 5. The proposed parking and circulation modifications, with the recommended conditions of approval, improves the general on -site circulation of the site. 6. Under the direction of the City of Campbell, an Expanded Initial Study was prepared by David J. Powers and Associates, Inc., for the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. 7. No substantial evidence has been presented which shows that the project, subject to implementation of mitigation measures identified in the Expanded Initial Study, will have a significant aoverse environmental impact. 8. The traffic study prepared by Linrscott, Law & Greenspan demonstrates that the proposed parking shared parking concept is sufficient to support the proposed development and the eMsting uses on the property. Planning Commission. Resolution No. 3134 SDP 97-Ol IS 97-20 — 1999 S. Bascom Avenue — Pruneyard Pace 2 9. The traffic study prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan indicates that the proposed office development will generate 1,711 vehicle trips per day during weekdays. 10. The existing development on the property consists of movie theaters, retail, office, and hotel uses. The proposed development is consistent with the existing uses on the property with adjacent land uses, subject to the conditions of approval. 11. The Circulation Element of the Campbell General Plan identifies the extension of Campisi Way as an improvement the City's circulation system. 12. The purpose of the Campisi Extension is to provide direct access to the Pruneyard by allowing traffic from Highway 17 and Hamilton Avenue west of Highway 17 to bypass Bascom Avenue. 13. The Campisi Extension is identified in the Circulation Element as a necessary circulation improvement to the Hamilton and Bascom commercial district area. 14. City traffic engineering estimates conclude that the extension of Campisi Way will result in the following: • Eliminates 252 northbound left turns at the Hamilton/Bascom intersection during the PM peak hour. • Reduces the PM peak hour delays at the Hamilton/Bascom intersection eight seconds below existing conditions. • Approximately 5,860 vehicles per day generated by the Pnmeyard would use the extension. • Traffic utilizing the extension would almost exclusively have an origin or destination at the Pruneyard. • Reduces travel time to and from the Pruneyard and both Highway 17 and Hamilton Avenue west of Highway 17. • Increases the amount of unused capacity at the Hamilton/Bascom intersection. • Has a positive impact on congestion in the vicinity of the Pruneyard. • Would off set th� project's traffic impacts that travel between the Pruneyard and both Highway 17 and locations on Hamilton Avenue west of Highway 17. 15. The extension of Campisi Way to the Pruneyard property directly benefits the Pruneyard. 16. The developer will be required to contribute a proportional share of the costs of construction to extend Campisi Way. There is a reasonal relationship between the amount of the contribution and the cost of the Campisi Way extension in that the project site would be the primary beneficiary of the extension. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3134 SDP 97-01 /S 97-20 — 1999 S. Bascom Avenue - Pnmeyard Page 3 17. The costs of construction to extend Campisi Way includes design/engineening, land acquisition, severance costs, construction, and demolition of structures at the Aloha Apartments necessary to accommodate the roadway. IS. • The contribution of a prop)rtional share of the costs to construct the extension of Campisi Way to the Pruneyard property is roughly proportional and reasonably related to the projects impacts. • There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the contribution and the type of development project being proposed in that the extension of Campisi Way would off- set the traffic impacts identified for this type of project. • There is a reasonable relationship between the need for the Campisi Way extension and the type of development being proposed in that the project will generate 1,711 vehicle trips per day during weekdays which would impact already congested City streets and Campisi Way would mitigate this impact. 19. Subsequent developments in the Hamilton and Bascom commercial district will be required to share in the costs of constructing the Campisi Way extension if the projects generate traffic that would pass through Hamilton/Bascom intersection. 20. The proposed use of the pre -cast concrete material on the facade of the new office tower has not been demonstrated to be consistent or architecturally compatible with the other building materials or paving treatments or buildings within the Pruneyard. 21. The proposed light green paint color on the roof on the elevator tower of the parking garage and on the roof screen of the new office tower is not compatible with the building colors of the proposed office tower. 22. The conditions of approval require details and revisions to the proposed building materials and paint colors so that they are architecturally compatible with the existing and proposed development. 23 The proposed parking garage is highly visible from Highway 17. 24. The proximity of the garage to the western property line does not allow the installation of sufficient landscaping to adequately screen the parking garage from Highway 17. 25. Existing off -site landscaping within the Caltrans right-of-way adjacent to the western property line is not sufficient to screen the proposed parking garage or the property from Highway 17. Planning Commission Res:iation No. 3134 SDP 97-Ol /S 97-20 — 19" S. Bascom Avenue — Pruneyard 26. The conditions of approval require supplemental off -site landscaping of 24" box Redwood trees in the adjacent Caltrans right-of-way to adequately screen the parking garage from Highway 17. 27. The proposed location of the parking garage necessitate the relocatio 1 of access to the Los Gatos Creek Trail access from the Pruneyard. 28. The proposed relocation of the Los Gatos Creek Trail access indicated on the site plans on the west side of the parking garage blocks visibility of the access and may compromise safety of pedestrians using the facility. 29. A condition of approval requires the app!icant to investigate alternative locations that provide more safety to users of the access or to install security cameras to monitor activity along the Creek Trail in the event that an alternative location is not found. Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further finds and concludes that: 1. The proposed project, with conditions of approval, is consistent with the policies of the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance in effect at the time of the application submittal and is consistent with uses in the immediate area. 2. The proposed project will aid in the enhancement and the harmonious development of the immediate area. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the use will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, peace, morals, comfort or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use. 3. The proposed use will not be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the City and its residents. 4. The proposed project with the conditions imposed, will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared for the project. S. The proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use and site improvements. 6. These conditions are required as related and proportional to the impacts of the project. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3134 SDP 97-Ol /S 97-20 — 1999 S. Bascom Avenue — Pruneyard The applicant is herebv notified, as part of this application, that he/she is required to meet the following conditions is in accordance with the ordinance of the City of Campbell and the State of California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this development and are not herein specified. 1 Project Approval - Approval is granted for a Special Development Permit (SDP 97-01) and Site and Architectural Review Permit (S 97-20) allowing development on property located at 1999 S. Bascom Avenue consisting of the following: • A six story, 130,000 gross square foot office building and; • A four level parking garage containing 730 parking spaces; Project approval shall substantially comply with project plans prepared by Homberger and Worstell, Inc. stamp dated 10/30/97, except as modified by the Conditions of Approval contained herein. 2. Project Aooroval: Approval is granted for a Use Permit (UP 97-11) allowing development on property located at 1875 S. Bascom Avenue consisting of the following: • A 54 room hotel addition; Project approval shall substantially comply with project plans prepared by Homberger and Worstell, Inc. stamp dated 10/-,0/97, except as modified by the Conditions of Approval contained herein. 3. Revised Office Buildine Elevations Buildine Materials - Applicant shall continue to work with staff on resolving the exterior treatment of building facade (substitution of the pre -cast concrete material) and the design of the roof screen (eliminate angled design) or integrate similar roof screens on the two existing office buildings to provide consistency with the architectural design of the existing office development. The Exterior facade details shall be referred to the Site and Architectural Review Committee and Planning Commission for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits for the office structure. Gara¢e Materials and Colors: Applicant shall work with staff to select appropriate building colors for the parking garage, the roof of tower, a id the roof screen on the office building, and alternative material for the elevator tower roof that is architecturally compatible with the existing developments on the subject property. The roof materials and colors of the parking garage shall be referred to the Site and Architectural Review Committee and Planning Commission for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Planning Commission Resoi-ation No. 3134 SDP 97-01, S 97-20 — 1999 S. Bascom Avenue — Pruneyard 4. Anoroved Materialsdreatment- Applicant shall submit final sample n: aterials indicating pedestrian level details, hardscape, mesh screening for the parking garage, and samples of actual finishes and colors that will be utilized on all new buildings, walkways, and courtyard areas for review and approval by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and Planning Commission. 5. Architectural Details- Applicant shall submit a site plan and illustrated brochures indicating the location and design of architectural features such as outdoor furniture, bicycle parking facilities, and non -fixed landscape planters that will utilized in the new building areas for approval by the Community Development Director. 6. Final Site Plan - Applicant shall submit a final site plan indicating circulation and parking modifications for review and subject to approval by the Community Development Director and the Public Works Director for substantial compliance with approved plans prior to issuance of building permits. 7. Devclopment Schedule - Construction of the office tower, parking garage and hotel expansion shall commence within one year from the date of project approval and shall be completed within one year following the commencement of construction. 8. Parkine and Driveways - All parking and driveway areas shall be developed in compliance with the approval and plans and Chapter 21.50 (Parking and Loading) of the Campbell Mwucipal Code subject to review by the Community Development Director. 9, On -site Lighting: On -site lighting shall be shielded away from adjacent properties and directed on site. Details of project lighting shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 10. Landscaoe Plan:: Applicant shall submit four (4) sets of the final landscaping plan ndicating the type and size of plant material including on -site trees, planting details and irrigation system to the Community Development Director for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. The plan shall include the number of trees proposed for removal or relocation due to construction, or circulation improvements. Any trees subject to removal or relocation shall be identified by size, type, number and species. 11. Tree Protection: A tree protection plan prepared by a licensed arborist shall be submitted to the Planning Division providing tree protection measures during all phases of demolition, resurfacing, or construction. An trees damaged during construction shall be replaced with three trees for every one removed. The size of replacement trees shall be 24 inch box. Planning Commission Resolution No 3134 SDP 97-01 /S 97-20 - 1999 S. Bascom Avenue - Pruneyard 12. The applicant shall submit landscaping plans indicating installation of 24-inch box Redwood trees and irrigation along the Caltrans right-of-way adjacent to the western property line to supplement existing landscaping in order to screen the site from view from Highway 17. The plan shall be submitted to the Campbell Community Development Director for approval prior to submittal to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The planting of trees shall be spaced consistent with the spacing of trees along the Highway 17 right-of-way northern of Hamilton Avenue. All necessary approvals and permits for landscaping on land located in the Caltrans right-of-way must be obtained at the expense of the applicant from the California Department of Transportation. The submittal of the off -site landscape plans shall be coordinated by the Campbell Community Development Department. The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the trees for the first five years following their installation. 13. Si ma¢e Pro¢ram - No signage is approved as pan of the development applications approved herein (SDP 97-01, S 97-20, UP 97-11). The applicant shall submit a sign program indicating all nev. signs for the site which are intended for the advertisement of uses within the site. No sign shall be installed until such application is approved and a permit issued by the Community Development Department, Planning Commission or ('itv Council as specified in Section 21.53. of the Zoning Ordinance (Sign Ordinance). 14. Freeway Sins - All new or refaced freeway oriented signs require approval from the City Council. 15. Construction Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall implement mitigation measures as specified in the Expanded Initial Study dated 10/22/97 (pages 39-40) prepared by David J. Powers and Associates, Inc. including the following: I. Construction activities will be limited to daytime hours of 8:00 am to 5:00 p.m. weekdays and 9 00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Saturdays. Construction is prohibited on Sundays and Holidays. 2 No pile driving is allowed for construction of the garage. 3. All internal combustion engines for construction equipment used on the site will be properly muffled and maintained. 4_ Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines is strictly prohibited. 5. All stationary noise generating construction equipment, such as air compressors and portable power generator, will be located as far as practical from the existing residences and businesses. 6. Occupants of the Aloha Apartment complex and tenants of the Pruneyard will be notified of the construction schedule in writing, and an on -site contact person and phone number shall be provided in the notice. 7. All active construction areas shall be watered at least twice daily. 8. Cover all trucks hauling soil and other loose matenals stationed or prior to leaving the site. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3134 SDP 97-01/S 97-20 — 1999 S. Bascom Avenue — Pruneyard Pace R 9. Pave, apply water, or apply non -toxic soil stabilizers on all unpaved surfaces, and staging areas at the construction site. 10. Sweep daily all paved access roads, parking areas, staging areas, and adjacent public streets as directed by the City Engineer. I I. Enclose, cover, water or apply soil binders to exposed stockpiles. 12. Limit traffic speeds on unpaved surfaces to 15 mph. 13. Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent runoff to all roadways, waterways or pubic walkways accessed by the public. 14. Replant vegetation in disturbed areas as soon as possible. 15. Establish a program for participation of vehicle trip reduction by corstruction crews. 16. Provide a monthly status report to the Building Official verifying conditions of the site, progress of construction and the implementation of construction mitigation measures. 16. Parkne Burin¢ r'oncm r' Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall ription indicating the location(s) an submit a diagrammatic Lite plan and narrative descd nwnber of parking spaces that will be displaced during construction, the proposed stacking area and the number of cars accommodated on -site in the stacking area, the number and schedule of attendants supervising the temporay parking arrangements and the location of off -site parking and shuttle for tenants of the Pruneyard. The temporary panting plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Deveiopment Director and the Publi; Works Director prior to issuance of building permits. 17. Archaeological Mitigation and .1 Uon'to iconitoring program prepared by a qualified archaeologist to monitory allsubsurface rg xclavat on and construction for review and approval by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. The program shall be consistent with the mitigation measures specified in the Expanded Initial Study dated 10/22/97 (page 41) prepared by David J. Powers and Associates. Inc. 18. Demolition Permit - The applicant is required to obtain a demolition permit, subject to review and approval by the Buila:mg Official prior to the demolition of structures or other on -site improvements that will be removed in conjunction with the approved plans 19. Trafii "WA= A. CZ:.pisi D__ en+�a�ty,0 - Applicant shall reserve a "no build" area on the subject property to provide for the future extension of Campisi Way in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and the City Engineer. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3134 SDP 97-01/S 97-20 — 1999 S. Bascom Avenue — Pruneyard B. CamDisi Way Contribution: The Applicant shall contribute a proportional share of the cost to extend Canrpisi Way to the Pruneyard property consistent with the Circulation Element of the Campbell General Plan. The cost to extend Campisi Way will include design/engineering, land acquisition, severance costs, construction, and demolition of structures at the Aloha Apartments necessary to accommodate the roadway. C. Exogriditure of Funds: The funds collected for the extension of Campisi Way shall be deposited, invested and accounted for pursuant to California Government Code Section 66006. If the necessary funds are not appropriated by the City for the construction of the Campisi Way extension within five years, the applicant shall contribute funds to improve traffic circulation in the vicinity of the Pruneyard to offset vehicle trips generated by the new development. The extension of Campisi Way is not required prior to the development or occupancy of the approved projects permitted under SDP 97-01, S 97-20, and UP 97.11. D. On -site Property Modification. The applicant shall be responsible for the costs of all on -site modifications(e.g. parking, curbs, flat work, etc.) necessary to accommodate a future terminus of Campisi Way to the Pruneyard property, at the time the extension is constructed. E. Rcolacemrnt Parkin¢: The applicant shall work with the City to accommodate parking displaced by the Campisi expansion. 20. Los Gatos Creek Trail Access: Applicant shall prepare appropriate plans and/or studies as directed by the City Engineer to determine an appropriate location to relocate the existing access to the Los Gatos Creek Trail from the Pruneyard property. Construction of the connection shall be completed by the applicant prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new office building. In the event that an alternate location is not found or an alternative Iccation includes area of limited visibility, the applicant shall install closed circuit secunt , cameras to monitor activity along the Creek Trail connection shown on the site plans. 21. Public Storm Drama¢e Farjli=: Applicant shall undertake a study in accordance with generally accepted engineer practice to determine requirements for relocation of public storm drainage facilities, if any, and fer relocation of public utilities, if any, as required to meet these conditions of approval. li required, submit storm drainage relocation plans and/or public utility relocation plans. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3134 SDP 97-01 /S 97-20 - 1999 S. Bascom Avenue - Pruneyard D...-- 1. 22. ROlacement of Pavement S rf - The applicant shall work with staff to ascertain the condition of existing paved surfaces throughout the Pruneyard and prepare a site plan identifying failed pavement. Areas showing failure or disrepair shall be replaced or rehabilitated if possible as determined by City staff. Prior to the installation of new pavement or asphalt surfaces, the applicant shall prepare a plan for review and approval by the Land Development Division of the Public Works Department providing section details of the replacement pavement. 23. apeea MM - Submit plans showing the location and replacement of all on -site speed bumps with City -approved speed undulations (speed bumps). 24. Underground ?tilities - Install new on -site utilities underground per Section 20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings. Provide evidence from all utility companies that the proposed development modifications can be served. Comply with the plan submittal, permit and fee requirements of the utilities associated with new or modified service connections. 25. Grading Plans: All grading plans shall meet City standards as deemed appropriate for the proposed development. A grading permit shall be required in conjunction with building permits. 26. lYe Plan: Submit grading and drainage plans with hydrology and hydraulic calculations for existing on -site drainage improvements and for proposed on -site grading improvements showing proposed pad elevations of new structures, existing and proposed on -site and off -site grading and storm drainage systems and controlled site drainage onto public right-of-way. 27. Grading/Erosion Control Pla_nc - Submit final grading, grading and erosion control plans to the Community Development and Public Works Departments for approval prior to issuance of building or grading permits. 28. Modified Storm Drainage Easement - The applicant shall modify the existing 20-foot wide City storm drainage easement that lies parallel and immediately adjacent to the westerly property line of the Pruneyard to reflect the allowed encroachment of approximately 175 feet in length of the western building wall of the parking garage. The encroachment into the easement in a westerly direction, shall not exceed four feet six inches. The revised easement description shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and the City Attorney. 29. Encroachment Permits - Submit application for an encroachment permit(s), pay fees and post surety for any construction within the City's right-of-way. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3134 SDP 97-Ol /S 97-20 — 1999 S. Bascom Avenue — Pruneyard 30. National pollutant Discharge Elimination Permit (NPDES) - The applicant is advised that the Regional Water Quality Control Board requires that all construction projects on sites larger than five acres must obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination (NPDES) permit. Permit conditions may require construction and post -construction storm water management plans. The applicant is responsible for obtaining this permit, providing plans ane paying associated fees. Copies of the permits shall be provided to the Community Development and Public Works Departments prior to the issuance of building permits. The applicant shall comply with the California Storm Water Best Management Practices Handbook prepared by the Storm Water Quality Task Force, Santa Clara Valley Water District. 31. Utilities - All utilities and utility pedestals for new or modified building areas shall be diagrammed on a site utility plan indicating the location of the pedestals and how the equipment will be screened prior to the installation of any utility pedestals (transformers) on site, subject to the review and approval by the Community Development Director. 32 Q rhaoe Collection - Trash containers of a size and quantity necessary to serve new or modified building areas shall be located in at:as approved by the Fire Department. Unless )therwise noted, enclosures, shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self -closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 33. Mechanical Eauinment - All roof -mounted and ground level mechanical equipment, on new or remodeled structures on site, which are visible from the public right of way shall be screened with similar building materials subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 34, Handicarmcd Accessibility - All new and remodeled buildings shall provide handicap access in accordance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC), and the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS) and the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). 35 Trick Deliveries and TrashCollection: Trash pick-up and Truck deliveries adjacent to the. northern boundary of the site will not be allowed earlier than 6:00 a.m. prior to and following the development approval of SDP 97-Ol/S 97-20/UP 97-1 I. 36. . Applicant shall participate in a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for future tenants and incorporate participation in such program through the covenants, conditions and restrictions. This program shall incorporate, but is not limited to the following: Planning Commission Resolution No. 3134 SDP 97-01 /S 97-20 — 1999 S. Bascom Avenue — Pruneyard Page 12 1. Provision of Bicycle Parking Facilities. 2. Participation in shuttle/car pool service to public transit facilities such as light rail stations or park and ride lots when these facilities are constructed. 3. Accommodation of bus stop locations, if public bus service is provided to the site. 4. Van car pool priority parking spaces. 5. Provision of changing facilities for employees bicycling to work in the new office building. 37. Car Detailing Station: The applicant shall provide a detailed operational statement and plans indicating the location of the car detailing station on the ground floor of the parking garage for review and approval by the Community Development Director and the Public Works Director. The operation of the car detailing station shall comply with all regulations, and practices and obtain all necessary permits to comply with the non -point source pollution controls/management. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1 I" day of November, 1997, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Francois, Jones, Lindstrom, , Meyer -Kennedy NOES: Commissioners: Gibbons, Kearns, Lowe ABSENT: Commissioners: None ABSTAIN: Commissioners: None APPROVED: G Susan A. Keami, Chair ATTEST: teve coact ecretary RESOLUTION NO.3135 BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (UP 97-11) TO ALLOW A 54-ROOM HOTEL EXPANSION ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1875 S. BASCOM AVENUE IN A C- 2-S (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) ZONING DISTRICT. APPLICATION OF MR. DAVID WORD, ON BEHALF OF WILLIAM WILSON & ASSOCIATES. FILE NO. UP 97-11. After notification and public hearing, as specified by law, and after presentation by the Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed After due consideration of all evidence presented, the Planning Commission finds as follows with respect to application UP 97-11: I . A Speci il Development Permit and Site and Architectural Permit propose the construction of one '. j0,000 gross square foot, six -story office building, and a four level parking garage containing 730 parking spaces on the western side of the project site. 2. The Conditional Use Permit application proposes a 54 room expansion to the Pruneyard Inn. 3. The proposed development applications, as conditioned, are consistent with the General Plan and Zoning designations which indicate a Commercial land uses for this property. 4. The proposed landscape plan and site amenities will improve the appearance of the proposed project. 5. The proposed parking and circulation modifications, with the recommended conditions of approval, improves the general on -site circulation of the site. 6. Under the direction of the City of Campbell, an Expanded Initial Study was prepared by David J. Powers and Associates, Inc., for the project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. 7. No substantial evidence has been presented which shows that the project, subject to implementation of mitigation measures identified in the Expanded Initial Study, will have a significant adverse environmental impact. 8. The traffic study prepared b Linscott, Law & Greenspan demonstrates that the proposed eP Y parking shared parking concept is sufficient to su -port the proposeA development and the existing uses on the property. 9 The traffic study prepared by Linton, Law & Greenspan indicates that the proposed office development will generate 1,711 vehicle trips per day during weekdays. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3135 UP 97-11 - 1875 S. Bascom Avenue - Pruneyard Inn Paste 2 10. The existing development on the property consists of movie theaters, retail, office, and hotel uses. The proposed development is consistent with the existing uses on the property with adjacent land uses, subject to the conditions of approval. I l . The Circulation Element of the Campbell General Plan identifies the extension of Campisi Way as an improvement the City's circulation system. 12. The purpose of the Campisi Extension is to provide direct access to the Pruneyard by allowing traffic from Highway 17 and Hamilton Bascom Avenue. Avenue west of Highway 17 to bypass 13. The Campisi Extension is identified in the Circulation Element as a necessary circu!ation improvement to the Hamilton and Bascom commercial district area. 14. City traffic engineering estimates conclude that the extension of Campisi Way will result in the following: 15 16. • Eliminates 252 northbound left turns at the Hamilton/Bascom intersection dining the PM peak hour. • Reduces the PM peak hour delays at the Hamilton/Bascom intersection eight seconds below existing conditions. • Approximately 5,860 vehicles per day generated by the Puse runeyard would the extension. • Traffic utilizing the extension would almost exclusively have an origin or destination at the Pruneyard. • Reduces travel time to and from the Pruneyard and both Highway 17 and Hamilton Avenue west of Highway 17. • Increases the amount of unused capacity at the Hamilton/Bascom intersection. • Has a positive impact on congestion in the vicinity of the Pruneyard. • Would off -set the project's traffic impacts that travel between the Pruneyard and both Highway 17 and locations on Hamilton Avenue west of Highway 17. The extension of Campisi Way to the Pruneyard property directly benefits the Pruneyard. The developer will be required to contribute a proportional share of the costs of construction to extend Campisi Way. There is a reasonal relationship between the amount of the contribution and the cost of the Campisi Way t -,tension in that the project site would be the primary beneficiary of the extension. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3135 UP 97-11 - 1875 S. Bascom Avenue - Pruneyard Inn Page 3 17. The costs of construction to extend Campisi Way includes design/engineering, land acquisition, severance costs, construction, and demolition of structures at the Aloha Apartments necessary to accommodate the roadway. 13. . The contribution of a proportional share of the costs to construct the extension of Campisi Wav to the Pruneyard property is toughly proportional and reasonably related to the projects impacts. • There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the contribution and the type of development project being proposed in that the extension of Campisi Way would off- set the traffic impacts identified for this type of project. • There is a reasonable relationship between the need for the Campisi Way extension and the type of development being proposed in that the project will generate 1,711 vehicle trips per day during weekdays which would impact already congested City streets and Campisi Way would mitigate this impact. 19. Subsequent developments in the Hamilton and Bascom commercial district will be required to share in the costs of constructing the Campisi Way extension if the projects generate traffic that would pass through HamiltonBascom intersection. 20. The proposed use of the pre -cast concrete material on the facade of the new office tower has not been demonstrated to be consistent or architecturally compatible with the other building materials or paving treatments or buildings within the Pruneyard. 21. The proposed light green paint color on the roof on the elevator tower of the parking garage and on the roof ,-creen of the new office tower is not compatible with the building colors of the proposed office tower. 22. The conditions of approval require details and revisions to the proposed building materials and paint colors so that they are architecturally compatible with the existing and proposed development. 23 The proposed parking garage is highly visible from Highway 17. 24. The proximity of the garage to the western property line does not allow the installation of sufficient landscaping to adequately screen the parking garage from Highway 17. 25. Existing off -site landscaping within the Caltrans right-of-way adjacent to the western property line is not sufficient to screen the proposed parking garage or the property from Highway 17. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3135 UP 97-11 - 1875 S. Bascom Avenue - Pruneyard Inn Page 4 26. The conditions of approval require supplemental off -site of 24" box Redwood trees in the adjacent Caltrans Wight -of -way to adequately screen the parking garage from Highway 17. 27. The proposed location of the parking garage necessitate the relocation of access to the Los Gatos Creek Trail access from the Pruneyard. 28. The proposed relocation of the Los Gatos Creek Trail access indicated on the site plans on 'he west side of the parking garage blocks visibility of the access and may compromise safety of pedestrians using the facility. 29. A condition of approval requires the applicant to investigate altemative locations that provide more safety to users of the access or to install security cameras to monitor activity along the C,eek Trail in the event that an alternative location is not found. Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further finds and concludes that 1 The proposed project, with conditions of approval, is consistent with the policies of the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance in effect at the time of the application submittal and is consistent with uses in the immediate area 2. The proposed project will aid in the enhancement and the harmonious 1:ment of the immediate area. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the use will not be detrimental to ti.e public health, safety, p*:ace, morals, comfort or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use. ]. The proposed use will not be detrimental or injunous to property and improvements in the n( ighborhood or to the general welfare of the City and its residents. 4. The proposed project with the conditions imposed, will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared for the project. 5. The proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use and site improvements. 6. These conditions are required as related and pro^ortional to the impacts of the project. The applicant is hereby notified, as pan of this application, that he/she is required t, meet the :ollowtng conditions is in accordance with the ordinance of the Cit)' of Campbell a-^d the State of California Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with Planning Commission Resolution No. 3135 UP 97-11 - 1875 S. Bascom Avenue - Pruneyard Inn Page 5 all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this development and are not herein specified. 1. Piolecl proval - Approval is granted for a Special Development Permit (SDP 97-01) and Site and Architectural Review Permit (S 97-20) allowing development on property located at 1999 S. Bascom Avenue consisting of the following: • A six story, 130,000 gross square foot office building and; • A four level parking garage containing 730 parking spaces; Project approval shall substantially comply with project plans prepared by Homberger and Worstell, Inc. stamp dated 10/30/97, except as modified by the Conditions of Approval contained herein. 2. Pro ect A ,➢royal: Approval is granted for a Use Permit (UP 97-11) allowing development on property located at 1875 S. Bascom Avenue consisting of the following: • A 54 room hotel addition; Project approval shall substantially comply with project plans prepared by Homberger and Worstell, Inc. stamp dated 10/30/97, except as modified by the Conditions of Approval contained he-ein. 3. Re%ised Office Building Elevations Building Materials - Applicant shall continue to work with staff on resolving the exterior treatment of building facade (substitution of the pre -cast concrete material) and the design of I. a roof screen (eliminate angled design) or integrate similar roof screens on the two existing office buildings to provide consistency with the architectural design of the existing office development. The Exterior facade details shall be referred to the Site and Architectural Review Committee and Planning Commission for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits for the office structure. Ciarage Materials and Cutors: Applicant shall work with staff to select appropriate building colors for the parking garage, the roof of tower, and the roof screen on the office building, and alternative material for the elev6tor tower roof that is architecturally compatible with the existing developments on the subject property The roof materials and colors of the parking garage shall be referred to the Site and Architectural Review Committee and Planning Commission for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits Planning Commission Resolution No. 3135 UP 97-11 - 1875 S. Bascom Avenue - Pruneyard Inn 4. ADRroved Materials/Treatment- Applicant shall submit final sample materials indicating pedestrian level details, hardscape, mesh screening for the parking garage, and samples of actual finishes and colors that will be utilized on all new buildings, walkways, and courtyard areas for review and approval by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and Planning Commission. 5. Architectural Details- Applicant shall submit a site plan and illustrated brochures indicating the location and design of architectural features such as outdoor furniture, bicycle parking facilities, and non -fixed landscape planters that will utilized in the new building areas for approval by the Community Development Director. 6. Final Site Plan - Applicant shall submit a final site plan indicating circulation and parking modifications for review and subject to approval by the Community Development Director and the Public Works Director for substantial compliance with approved plans prior to issuance of building permits. 7. Development Schedule - Construction of the office tower, parking garage and hotel expansion shall commence within one year from the date of project approval and shall be completed within one year following the commencement of construction. 8 Parking and Driveway s - All parking and driveway areas shall be developed in compliance with the approval and plans and Chapter 21.50 (Parking and Loading) of the Campbell Municipal Code subject to review by the Community Development Director. S. On -site Li¢httn¢: On -site lighting shall be shielded away from adjacent properties and directed on site. Details of project lighting shall be approved by the Planning Department pnor to the issuance of building permits. 10 Landscape Plan: Applicant shall submit four (4) sets of the final landscaping plan ndicating the type and site of plant material including on -site trees, planting details and irrigation systew to the Community Development Director for review and al;:roval prior to the issuance of building permits. 1;,e plan shall include the number of trees proposed for removal or relocation due to construction, or circulation improvements. Any trees subject to removal or relocation shall he identified by size, type, number and species. 11, Tree Protection: A tree protection plan, prepared by a licensed arborist shall be submitted to the Planning Division providing tree protection measures during all phases of demolition, resurfacing, or construction. An trees damaged during construction shall be replaced with three trees for everyone removed. The size of replacement trees shall be 24 inch box. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3135 UP 97-11 - 1875 S. Bascom Avenue - Pruneyard Inn Page 7 12. Off -site Landscaping: The applicant shall submit landscaping plans indicating installation of 24-inch box Redwood trees and irrigation along the Caltrans right-of-way adjacent to the western property line to supplement existing landscaping in order to screen the site from view from Highway 17. The plan shall be submitted to the Campbell Cornmunit} Development Director for approval prior to submittal to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The planting of trees shall be spaced consistent with the spacing of trees along the Highway 17 right-of-way northern of Hamilton Avenue. All necessary approvals and permits for landscaping on land located in the Caltrans right-of-way must be obtained at the expense of the applicant from the California Department of Transportation. The submittal of the off -site landscape plans shall be coordinated by the Campbell Community Development Department. The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the trees for the first five years following their installation. i3. Signage Progam- No signage is approved as part of the development applications approved herein (SUP 97-01, S 97-20, UP 97.11). The applicant shall submit a sign program indicating all new signs for the site which are intended for the advertisement of uses within the site. No sign shall be installed until such application is approved and a permit issued by the Community Development Department, Planning Commission or City Council as specified in Section 21 53. of the Zoning Crdinance (Sign Ordinance). 14. Freeway Signs - All new or refaced freeway oriented signs require approval from the City Council. 15, Construction Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall implement mitigation measures as specified in the Expanded Initial Study dated 10/22/97 (pages 39-40) prepared by David 1. Powers and Associates, Inc. including the following: 1. Construction activities will be I sited to '.:,time hours of 8:00 am to 5:00 p.m. weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Saturdays. Construction is prohibited on Sundays and Holidays. 2. No pile driving is allowed for construction of the garage. 3. All internal combustion engines for construction equipment used on the site will be properly muffled and maintained. 4. Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engwes is strictly prohibited. 5. All stationary noise generating construction equipment, s::ch as xr compressors and portable power generator, will be located as far as practical firom the existing residences and businesses. 6. Occupants of the Aloha Apartment complex and tenants of the Pruneyard will be notified of the construction schedule in writing, and an en -site contact person and phone number shzll be provided in the notice. 7. All active construction areas shall be watered at least twice daily. 8. Cover all trucks hauling soil and other loose materials stationed or prior to leaving the site. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3135 UP 97-11 - 1875 S. Bascom Avenue - Pruneyard Inn ago o - 9. Pave, apply water, or apply non -toxic soil stabilizers on all unpaved surfaces, and staging areas at the construction site. 10. Sweep daily all paved access roads, parking areas, staging areas, and adjacent public streets as directed by the City Engineer. 11. Enclose, cover, water or apply soil binders to exposed stockpiles. 12. Limit traffic speeds on unpaved surfaces to 15 mph. 13. Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent runoff to ail roadways, waterways or pubic walkways accessed by the public. 14. Replant vegetation in disturbed areas as soon as possible. 15. Establish a program for participation of vehicle trip reduction by construction crews. 16. Provide a monthly status report to the Building Official verifying conditions of the site, progress of construction and the implementation of construction mitigation measures. 16. Parking during Construction: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a diagrammatic site plan and narrative description indicating the location(s) and number of parking spaces that will be displaced during construction, the proposed stacking area and the number of cars accommodated on -site in the stacking area, the number and schedule of attendants supervising the temporary parking arrangements, and the location of off -site parking and shuttle for tenants of the Prmeyard. The temporary parking plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director and the Public Works Director prior to issuance of building permits. 17 Archaeological Mitigation and Monitoring ..^roaram: Provide an archaeological momteting program prepared by a qualified archaeologist to monitor all subsurface excavation and construction for review and approval by the Community Development Director pnot to 'he issuance of building permits. The program shall be consistent with the mitigWion measures specified in the Expanded Initial Study dated 10/22/97 (page 41) prepared by David J. Powers and Associates, Inc. 18. Demolition Permit - The applicant is required to obtain a demolition permit, subject to review and approval by the Building Official prior to the demolition of structures or other on -site Improvements that will be removed in conjunction with the approved plTns. 1a. 11af7ic Cirulation Camoisi Dedicatign - Applicant shall reserve a "no Hild" area on the subject property to provi& for the future extension of Campisi Way in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and the City Engineer. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3135 UP 97-11 - 1875 S. Bascom Avenue - Pruneyard Inn B. Campisi Way Contribution: The Applicant shall contribute a proportional share of the cost to extend Campisi Way to the Pruneyard property consistent with the Circulation Element of the Campbell General Plan. The cost to extend Campisi Way will include design/engineering, land acquisition, severance costs, construction, and demolition of structures at the Aloha Apartments necessary to accommodate the roadway. C. Expenditure of Funds: The funds collected for the extension of Campisi Way shall be deposited, invested and accounted for pursuant to California Government Code Section 66006. If the necessary funds are not appropriated by the City for the construction of the Campisi Way extension within five years, the applicant shall contribute funds to improve traffic circulation in the vicinity of the Pruneyard to offset vehicle trips generated by the new development The extension of Campisi Way is not required prior to the development or occupancy of the approved projects permitted under SDP 97-01, S 97-20, and UP 97-11. D. On -site Properly Modifications: The applicant shall be responsible for the costs of all on -site modifications(e.g. parking, curbs, flat work, etc.) necessary to accommodate a future terminus of Campisi Way to the Pruneyard property, 2t the time the extension is constructed. E. Replacement Pa:kin¢: The applicant shall work with the City to accommodate parking displaced by the Campisi expansion. 20. Los Gatos Creek Trail Access: Applicant shall prepare appropriate plans and/or studies as directed by the City Engineer to determine an appropnatc location to relocate the existing access to the Los Gatos Creek Trail from the Pruneyard property. Construction of the connection shall be compieted by the applicant prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new office building. In the event that an alternate location is not found or an altemative location includes area of limited visibility, the applicant shall install closed circuit security cameras to monitor activity along the Creek Trail connection shown on the site plans. 21. Public Storm Drainage Facility: Applicant shall undertake a study in accordance with generally accepted engineer practice to determine requirements for relocation of public storm drainage facilities, if any, and for relocation of public utilities, if any, as required to meet these conditions of approval. If required, submit storm drainage relocation plans and/or public utility relocation plans. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3135 UP 97-11 - 1875 S. Bascom Avenue - Pruneyard Inn 22. $£placement of Pavement Surfaces - The applicant shall work with staff to ascertain the condition of existing paved surfaces throughout the Pruneyard and prepare a site plan identifying failed pavement. Areas showing failure or disrepair shall be replaced or rehabilitated if possible as determined by City str.'. Prior to the installation of new pavement or asphalt surfaces, the applicant shall prepare a plan for review and approval by the Land Development Division of the Public `k orks Department providing section details of the replacement pavement. 23. Speed Bumps - Submit plans showing the location and replacement of all on -site speed bumps with City -approved speed undulations (speed bumps). 24. Underground Utilities - Install new on -site utilities underground per Section 20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings. Provide evidence from all utility companies that the proposed development modifications can be served. Comply with the plan submittal, permit and fee requirements of the utilities associated with new or modified service connections. 25. Grading Plans' All grading plans shall meet City standards as deemed appropriate for the proposed development. A grading permit shall be required in conjunction with building permits. 26. Drainage Plans: Submit grading and drainage plans with hydrology and hydraulic calculations for existing on -site drainage improvements and for proposed on -site grading improvements showing proposed pad elevations of new structures, existing and proposed on -site and off -site grading and storm drainage systems and controlled site drainage onto public right-of-way. 27. Gradine/Erosion Control Plans - Submit final grading, grading and erosion control plans to the Community Development and Public Works Departments for approval prior to issuance of building or grading permits. 28. Mod fred Storm Drainage Easement - The applicant shall modify the existing 20-fora wide City storm drainage easement that lies parallel and immediately adjacent to the westerly property line of the Pruncyard to reflect the allowed encroachment of approximately 175 feet in length of the western building wall of the parking garage. The encroachment into the easement in a westerly direction, shall not exceed four feet six inches. The revised easement description shall be subject to review and approval by the City Frigineer and the City Attorney. 29. Encroachment Permits - Submit application for an encroachment permit(s), pay fees and post surety for any construction within the City's right-of-way Planning Commission Resolution No. 3135 UP 97-11 - 1875 S. Bascom Avenue - Pruneyard Inn 30, National Poll^""' Discharge Elimination Permit (NPDES) - The applicant is advised that the Regional Water Quality Control Board requires that all construction projects on sites larger than five acres must obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination (NPDES) permit. Permit conditions may require construction and post -construction storm water management plans. The applicant is responsible for obtaining this permit, providing plans and paying associated fees. Copies of the permits shall be provided to the Community Development and Public Works Departments prior to the issuance of building permits. The applicant shall comply with the California Storm Water Best Management Practices Handbook prepared by the Storm Water Quality Task Force, Santa Clara Valley Water District. 31. Utilities - All utilities and utility pedestals for new or modified building areas shall be diagrammed on a site utility plan indicating the location of the pedestals and how the equipment will be screened prior to the installation rf any utility pedestals (transformers) on site, subject to the review and approval by the Community Development Director. 32. t arba¢e Collection - Trash containers of a size and quantity necessary to serve new or modified building areas shall be located in areas approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosures, shall consist of a concrete Floor surrounaed by a solid wall or fence and have self -closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 33. Mechanical Equipment - All roof -mounted and ground level mechanical equipment, on new or remodeled structures on which are visible from the public right of way shall be screened with similar building materials subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 14. Handicapped Accessibility - All new and remodeled buiiaings shall provide handicap access in accordance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC), and the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS) and the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). 35. Truck D liveries and Trash Collection: Trash pick-up and Truck deliveries adjacent to the northern boundary of the site will not be allowed earlier than 6:00 a.m. prior to and following the development approval of SDP 97-01 /S 97-20/UP 97-11. 36. rranrportation Demand Management: Applicant shall participate in a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for future tenants and incorporate participation in such program through the covenants, conditions and restrictions. This program shall incorporate, but is not limited to the fol!owing: Planning Commission Resolution No. 3135 UP 97-1 1 - 1875 S. Bascom Avenue - Pruneyard Inn Pace 12 1. Provision of Bicycle Parking Facilities. 2. Participation in shuttle/car pool service to public transit facilities such as light rail stations or park and ride lots when these facilities are constructed. 3. Accommodation of bus stop locations, if public bus service is provided to the site. 4 Van car pool priority parking spaces. 5. Provision of changing facilities for employees bicycling to work in the new office building. 37. Car Detailing Station: The applicant shall provide a detailed operational statement and plans indicating the location of the car detailing station on the ground floor of the parking garage for review and approval by the Community Development Director and the Public Works Dirxtor. The operation of the car detailing station shall comply with all regulations, and practices and obtain all necessary permits to comply with the non -point source pollution controls/management. PASSED AND ADOPTED this I I' day of November, 1997, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Francois, Gibbons, Jones, Kearns, Lindstrom, Lowe, Meyer -Kennedy NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Not.e ABSTAIN: Commissioners: None APPROVED: Susan A. Kearns, Chair ATTEST: "3leve aaec r, ecretary Planning Commission Minutes of November 11, 1997 Pace 3 Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Lowe, seconded by Commissioner Meyer - Kennedy, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 3133 approving a Conditional Use Permit (UP 97-17) to allow the construction of a 640 square foot secondary living unit with an attached 578 square foot garage on property located at 645 Chapman Avenue, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Francois, Gibbons, Jones, Kearns, Lindstrom, Lowe, Meyer - Kennedy NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Chairwoman Kearns read Agenda Item No. 2 into the record: 2. SDP 97-01/S 97-201 Public Hearing to consider the application of Mr. David :Nord, UP 97-11 on behalf of William Wilson and Associates, for approval of a Word,D. Special Development Permit (SDP 97-01) and Site and Architectural Approval (S 97-20) to allow the construction of a six- story, 130,000 square foot, office building and a four -level parking garage on property located at 19" S. Bascom Avenue in a C-2-0 (General Commercial/Overlay) Zoning District and approval of a Conditional Use Permit (UP 97-11) to allow a 54- room hotel expansion on property located at 1975 S. Bascom Avenue in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project. Ms. Gloria Sciara, Planner 11, presented the staff report as follows: • The applicant is seeking approval of a Special Development Permit (SDP 97-01) and a Site and Architectural Appro� ^t tc 97 ^ to allow the construction of a six -story office building and a four-story parking gar ige and approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow a 54-room hotel expansion. • An environmental study was conducted by David J. Powers & Associates which evaluated traffic, parking and construction impacts. • No significant impacts were identified. • Staff is recommending a Mitigated Negative Declaration and has prepared a Mitigation Monitoring Program. • The project site was developed in the 1970s and includes two existing towers. Additionally extensive remodeling has occurred on site which has recently been completed. • The proposed office tower site is located in an overlay zoning district which requires a Special Development Permit approval. • The maximum height allowed is 75 feet or a total of six stories. • The proposed project meets the Zoning requirements. • The final approval of the office tower must be granted by Council. Planting Commission Minutes of November 11 1997 Pa e 4 • The hotel expansion can be approved by the Planning Commission whose decision is final pending appeal within. 10 days. • The proposed tower is a six -story structure which will integrate with the existing two towers. The building consists of three segments, two end pieces and a center element. Materials include tinted glass, vertical elements and a grid element. • A U-shaped courtyard will be installed to help link the three office towers and an enhanced pedestrian linkage is proposed. • The parking structure will be a four -level garage which will primarily serve the office buildings but can also offer additional parking to the shopping center. • The garage incorporates a half wall which allows visibility. The architecture is subdued. • Staffis proposing additional landscaping around the parking structure. • The hotel expansion will include the continuation of the existing design and materials and will include a three-story format. • Staff is supportive of the proposed uses. • Staff proposes to work with the applicant to work out conflicts regarding the use of the grid and the roofing ire rtments. • Parking is found to be sufficient with an increase of 440 spaces. • On the northern section of the site, some parking spaces will be removed in order to create a drive aisle. • An additional condition is that the applicant work with staff to develop alternatives for the location/relocation of the access to the Los Gatos Creek Trail. If the trail access location is not moved from behind the proposed garage stn, tune, it is recommended that security cameras be installed to monitor for safety. • Staff recommends approval. Commissioner Gibbons asked for the schedule for the proposed Campisi extension. Mr. Steve Piasecki, Community Development Director advised that there is no time schedule set. Applicant will be asked to pay a proportionate share of the cost for this extension. Commissioner Gibbons asked when the traffic counts were taken and what the vacancy rates of the site were at the time of the reading. Ms. Gloria Sciass replied that the site was initially I00% leased ana occupied. Chairwoman Kcarns expressed con(.-ms about the materials, colors, etc. Ms. Gloria Sciara advised that conditions are in place so that materials have to come back to both SARC and the Planning Commission for review and approval. Commissioner Gibbons asked the distance between the proposed garage and the adjacent apartments. Ms. Gloria Sciara replied that there is a 10-foot setback from the property line to the garage structure. 1999 S. BASCOM AVE. S 97-20/UP 97-11 b OF 7 CITY OF CAMPBELL FLAN. 08/2000 K E N K A Y A S S 1) C I A T E S TR \NSMITTAL Date March 19, 1999 Job Name Pruneyard Office Job No. 9802 To Gloria Sciara & Bill Helms City of Campbell Community Development 70 North First Street Campbell, California 95008 i Landscape Arrhiterhire Urban Planning 1045 Sansome Street Studio 321 San Francisco California 94111 (415) 956-44 2 1415) 956-4522 Fax KenKacSF 0 aoLrom Description '! Prints Sperifirati\ns 1 - Trarin." _ Other 1R 1 Via: _ Messenger Mail Remarks Sent By Blueprinter Other RECEIVED MAR 2 2 1999 CITY OF CAMPBELL Enclosed please find: PLANNING DEPT. • Sheet L1.2 Garage Layout Plan, dated March 19, 1999 showing the revised bike path as an 8'-0" path behind the garage. For your use. cc: Kheay Loke, Wilson Cornerstone Ron McLester, Homberger + Worstell, Inc. Joe Wathen, Webcor Respectfully, Guy Crims ■ ■ ■ r .--i P.A. Li �T71GARBAGE cn cn PA"JNG LOT LAYOUT AND GRADING: P Ar SEE CIVIL DWGS. . � 6" DID. PIPE BOLLARDS OF 3, TYP. I P.A. I v (E) TRANSFORMER (E) VAULT----.. PAV. (FIELD) TYPE "B" ( , L SEE FINISH SCHED. L2. _ n 1 -A-/—I'\ 0 (N) EJ. AT EDGE- I OF (E) TILE PAVING WORK POINT "C" FOR PLANTER \ LAYOUT 1 (E) TILE PAVING TO REMAIN I(E) TREE TYP. TOWER 1 I I 1 (01(F . ❑0 P.A. I BANDS TYPE "A" FIN. FIELD TYPE "B" FIN. TYP., SEE FINISH SCHED. L2.2 P.A. G r—T1 LIMIT OF WORK LINE. TYP. III PARKING LOT LAYOUT AND GRADING: SEE CIVIL DWGS. — CONC. CURB, TYP. SEE CIVIL DWGS. I I L* -- --I _� L.O.W. Notes 1. For Layout Legend, Finish Schedule and additional Layout Notes am abet Ll.l Sheet Notes 0 New bike path to meet w/ existing bike path at the property line. Field stake a 30 R long smooth S-curve transition between new and existing path for owner representative's review prior to pathwaY won. O2 Pole mounted light fixWm shall align with To. 1 colnmr mounted lights. (E(E)—SIGIT a [ON PRUNEYARD PLACE Compuware Corp. Regional Offices 1919 South Bascom Blvd. Campbell, Ca. WILLIAM WILSON & ASSOCIATES San Mateo, California Developer ■ KENKAY P-A. ASSOCIATES Landscappee Architecture k Urban Design 3 C ..i Matchline 1045 Sansome Street - Studio 321 Sea Francisco, CA 94111 (413) 936-4472 (415) 936-4322 Far Hlornberger + V%rstelV Inc . Architects a Planners 170 Maiden Lane / Sea Francisco, California 94108 413 391 1080 ■ 3119M9 CLARIFICATION 21299 CLARIFICATION . 1 5/4/98 ADDENDUM NO. 1 411%. PEW -UT ' 9002 V-Xr-0' A e.. w ..d .r. r.ri VFW" crw��rr.rr�r,�u. rerr e nR aueMrwr ♦ bnUR m. GARAGE LAYOUT PLAN Y 4'-0" A Garage Entry Plaza _ Scale: 1/4" - F - 0" 0 10 m 40 F.1 LI. 2 ■ • J • t ONCRETE PAVING SEE FINISH SCHEDULE 6x6-W1.4xW1.4WWF COMPACTED CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE NOTE: FOR COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS SEE SPECS. Section: Pedestrian Concrete Paving Scale: 6" = 1' - 0" TO PLAN VIEW - CURVED HEADER SIDE VIEW - HEADER SPLICE SECTION Wood Header Scale: NTS 2x4x24" SPLICE BLOCK 2z4 STAKE, TYP. 2x4 HEADER POINT OF TANGENCY 4 - I/2x4 AT CURVED SECTION RADIUS AS SHOWN ON PLANS 2x4 HEADER HEADER STAKE, TYP. 2x4x24" SPLICE BLOCK 10d GALV. NAE S STAGGER AT SPLICE 1 • 1 Concrete Bike Path Scale: 6" = 1' - 0" Deep Root Barrier Scale: NTS ASPHALT CONCRETE COMPACTED CLASS 11 AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE NOTE: FOR COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS SEE SPECS. DISTANCE VARIES, SEE PLAN (E) CURB & GUTTER OR EDGE OF SLAB PLANT PIT (SEE PLANTING DETAIL) THIGH CONTINUOUS ROOT BARRIER STRIP, SEE PLAN FOR LENGTHS UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE Section - Expansion Joint Section - Score Joint ■ 3 _ PRUNEYARD r-- PLACE TOOL ALL EDGES - SEALANT COLOR TO MATCH CONCRETE COLOR PRE -MOLDED EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL CONCRETE PAVING - SEE LAYOUT PLANS 1/2" DIA. SMOOTH STL. ROD @ 24" O.C. - GREASE ONE END PRE -MOLDED EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL 1/4" _ TOOL EDGES, TYP. 1/3 OF SLAB THICKNESS ' CONCRETE PAVING - SEE LAYOUT PLANS Paving Joints Scale: NTS Note: Base Bid - Install at each tree island in paridng lots. Bid Alternate - Furnish unit price for additional installations as directed by the owners representative. MIN. DIA. Typical Drainage Sump Detail Scale: NTS NOTE: SEE LAYOUT PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF EXPANSION AND SCOREJOINTS PLANT PIT 'SEE PLANTING DETAIL) PVC CAP (BLACK) FINISH GRADE t' DIA. PERF. PVC MONITORING TUBE WRAPPED IN FILTER FABRIC UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE OR RECOMpACTED SOIL AS APPROPRIATE DRAINAGE SUMP (AUGER HOLE) 2 PER TREE, SEE SPECS. 1 1/2" DIA. DRAIN ROCK Compuware Corp. Regional Offices 1919 South Bascom Blvd. Campbell, Co. WILLIAM WILSON & ASSOCIATES San Mateo, California Developer • KENKAY ASSOCIATES Landscape Architecture k Urban Design 1045 Sansome Street - Studio 321 San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 956-4472 (415) 956-4522 Fax Hornberger + Mrstell, Inc. Architects k Planners 170 Maiden Lane San Francisco, California 94108 415 391 1080 ■ 1 5/4/98 ADDENDUM NO. I 2/11/98 PERMIT SET 9802 -ES D. s/ M ,ter d u..rtwAE elm amnMrEer . a"sULL lac. LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS L2.2 ■ • SOMEONE PRUNEYARD OLEEUR 3 PIT EUG 1 6 I W-o" O.C. 1 5 G 24" BOX 6 HED HEL Q FLAT 8" O.C. LIMIT OF WORK LINE, TYP• T L A C E PLACE ■ ■ 9 3 TRA HEL ALIGN LIG I FIXTURE W/ COLUMN / CUP EM 3 / IALIGNMENT I i BOX SEE L4.1 } BIKE RACK 9 1 xYL oN I'TOWER 51o6 I 1 / _ PAR 13 I za" I / \ 1 I BOX --w l / L MEN .�� MEN ESC COM 100 I T-O" O.C. I 1 G ULM PAR I 24" BOX Notes 1. For Plant Legend and Notes, see sheet L4.1. 2. For Plant List, see sheet L5.1 3. Flat count is based on 64 Plants Per flat. ZL ate =a-i. -- -- ---- Z� BIKE PATH 3 CUP SEM ally I �, 16 1 HED HEL 9 CUP iG 24" BOX POP NIG jr54t1 aAAS (490 4.F.) 3 OLE EUR T� 24" 8 BOX 15 4 I XYL CON 56 MEN = 7JAS34/7 MEN MEN TR 3'-0" O.C. I 1 G Sheet Notes /GARAGE 0 OLEEURI 2 zil la>_s�MEN L.O.W. (E) TREE #51 TO REMAIN © NO PLANTING FINGER HERE (Melaleuca) RELOCATE 2 - 24" BOX OLE EUR AND 56 - 1 G TRA JAS (504 S.F.) NEW CURBED FINGER AND #30 (OlivesTREES TO ) #20 Ol Deep root barrier locations shown diagrammatically. Locate within planting areas at back of curb or face of slab. Extend 6' beyond centerline of poplar trunk. O2 Mulch strip between curb or path and R. w/ 2" specified mulch. (E) SIGN Compuware Corp. Regional Offices 1919 South Bascom Blvd. Campbell, Ca. WILLIAM WILSON & ASSOCIATES San Mateo, California Developer KENKAY r= _- ASSOCIATES - Landscape Architecture k P • - — Urban Design 1045 Sansone Street - Studio 321 San Francisco, CA 94111 - - 1415) 956-4472 CUP SEM 13 (415) 956-4522 Fax 24" — - -- - BOX 3 TRA JAS 190 -- - ° "O Hornberger + 3' 1G V%rstell, Inc . Architects It Planners 170 Maiden :.ase San Francisco, California 94108 415 391 1080 NER OLE 17 SG -_- • 301 IRA JAS I G 3'-0" O.C. RELOCATE _ 2 CUP SEM Q REMOVE (E) TREE #19 /_ 195 ESC COM 10 2'-0" O.C. _ --- Matchline: See Sheet L4.1, Inn Planting Plan 392 TRA JAS 1 G 3'-0" O.C. 2/22/99 CLARRFFICATION 2 12/10/98 CLARIFICATION • 1 5/4/98 ADDENDUM NO. 1 11i98 R `IT SET N. }cr aambr 9r"Y 9902 '-20'-0' a.n by ce k d by W1n.ly W wllW �IMI .YM..W YM m.dl- W o,lpsl ud uyuYYYd .at d 1Y .rtW.el ud m") ml b d.pr.W. � a araad MGo.I u. n*r .rdl"e <�d d IL .rtWtsl I'm aor WW . M1"LL Irc. GARAGE PLANTING PLAN Garage Entry Plaza Scale: 1/4" = 1' - 0" 10 r�, L4.2 ■ PLAN PLAN VIEW — -- RUBBER STRAP TREE STAKE Cr<;5;;� TREE STAKE NOT TO EXTEND INTO BRANCHES 3/4" x 1/4" BLACK RUBBER STRAP, ATTACH WITH GALVANIZED NAILS - INSTALL TREE STRAPS SECURELY AT LOWEST POINT NECESSARY TO HOLD TREE UPRIGHT AND BELOW CROWN (2) 2" DIA. LODGEPOLE PINE STAKES SET INTO UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE. LOCATE AT EDGE OF ROOTBALL. DO NOT PENETRATE ROOTBALL. 1" x 4" BRACE, OFFSET STAKES FROM TRUNK TO AVOID ABRASION. SET ROOT CROWN 1 1/2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE �2" MULCH LAYER — 4" SOIL BERM CONTINUOUS ON FLAT AREAS �— AND DOWNHILL SIDES ONLY - ON SLOPES, BEGIN BERM AT EDGE OF ROOTBALL PREPARED BACKFILL MIX - SEE SPECS .1 7SEESPECS. * SCARIFY SIDES OF HOLE SCARIFY EXISTING SOIL TO 6" DEPTH UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE Tree Planting & Staking for 15 Gallon & 24" Box Scale: NTS + + SHRUB OR ORNAMENTAL GRASS PLANTING LOCATIONS TYP., TRIANGULAR SPACING SEE DETAIL 1 BUILDING, CURB, OR HEADER —� SET ROOT CROWN 1 1/2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE ■� ZZ— 2" MULCH LAYER 2" SOIL BERM CONTINUOUS ON FLAT AREAS AND DOWNHILL SIDES ONLY - ON SLOPES, BEGIN BERM AT EDGE OF ROOTBALL FENCE, WALL, OR TRELLIS POST STANDARD NURSERY TAPE - TIED LOOSELY TO EYEBOLT OR HOOK WOOD �GALVANIZED EYEBOLT POST _ IN WOOD OR EPDXYED EYEHOOK ON METAL OR CONCRE i-E ROOT CROWN 1 1/2" ABOVE FINISH GRADE —2" MULCH 1 AYER 2" SOIL BERM CONTINUOUS ON FLAT AREAS AND DOWNHILL SIDES ONLY - ON SLOPES, BEGIN BERM AT EDGE OF ROOTBALL PREPARED BACKFILL MIX - SEE SPECS. SEE SPECS. Vine Planting 2 Scale: NTS SHRUB, GROUND COVER OR GRASS PLUG LOCATIONS + P., TRIANGULAR SPACING AS \ AS PFQ1JIf.ED \\T. SIDEWALK, SLAB, CURB OR HEADER + SIDES OF HOLE EXISTING SOIL TO 6" DEPTH RBEDSUBGRADE D D X rl TRIANGULAR SPACING CHART SPACING "D" SPACING "X" SYAC r1 ` PREPARED BACKFILL MIX - SEE SPECS. 11-01, O.C. 10" 10" IY yt 1'-6" O.0 16" 12" SEE SPECS. SCARIFY SIDES OF HOLE 2 �1„ O.C. 21" 15" SCARIFY EXISTING SOIL TO 6" DEPTH 3'4" O.C. 30" 21" "—UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE SECTION 0 Plant List Key Botanical Name Commas Name Size `pacing Remarks Trees CUP S C ressus -e wirers Italieo C teas 24" Box See Plan IM 2 OL Bll' Koelreuteria bi innata Chinese Flame Tree 24" Sox Olea europea 'Swan Hill' Swan Hill Olive 24" Box OLE EUR Olea europea Swan Hill' Swan Hill Olive 20" Box Planter Pots PIT EUG Pinasporum eugenioides Pittoaporum 15 gal. 6'-0" O.C. PIA YAR Platanus acerifolia 'Yarwood' London Plane Tree 24" Box POD GRA podocarpus gracilior Fern Pine 24" Box POP NIA nigra '/talica' Lombardy Poplar 24" Box PRU CER Prunus cerasifera Allred' Prunus Purple - Leaf Plum 24" Box PRU YED Prunus yedoensis Akebono' Yoshino Flowering Cherry 24" Box PYR CAL Pyrus calleryana 'Chanticleer Chanticleer Pear 24" Box ULM PAR U/mus parvifolia Drake' Evergreen Elm 24" Box pis chinensis Chinese Pistache 24" Box PIS CHIw Shrubs 2 UX MIC — rus microphylla E'inter preen' Winter green boxwood 5 gal_ See Plan _B• Escallonia 'Compacts' Dwarf Escalloma 1 gal. 2' O.C. FAT JAP Fatsia Japonica Japanese Aralia 5 gal. NER OLE Nerium Oleander 'White' Oleander 5 B�• Y-0" O.C. PIT EUG Pittosporum eugenioides Pittosponim 5 gal. 19-0" O.C. RAP IND Raphiolepis indica 'Clara' India Hawthorn 5 gal. can RHO AZA Rhododendron -Azalea Al iska' Azalea 5 gal. 2'-6" O.C. ROS OFF Rosmarinus oficinalis 'Tuscan Blue' Rosemary 5 gal. Y-0" O.C. XYL CON Xylosma congestion 'Compacta' Dwarf Xylostna 5 gal. Y-0" J.C. Perenniai, LAV DEN _ Lavandula Dentata French Lavender 1 gal. I%3" O.C. Salvia microphy!!a Sage 1 gal. 2 -0 O.C. Seslaria Autumnalis Autumn Moor Grass I gal. 1'-0" O.C. Vines DIS BUC Distictis bucchatoria Blood - Red Trumpet Vine 5 gal. See Plan FIC PUM Ficus pumila Creeping Fig 5 gal. HED HEL Hedera helix Needlepoint' 'Needlepoint Ivy 5 gal. Ground Cover TRA )AS Traehelospermum jasr Inoides Star Jasmine 1 gal. 3' OC. HED HEL Hedera helix Needlepoint' Needlepoint Ivy From Flats 8" O.C. Annuals Seasonal Color To be selected by 4" Pots 8" O.C. Landscape Architect FAI IMPORTED TOPSOIL, SEE SPECS. EXISTING SUBGRADE. CROSS -RIPPED UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE NOTE: DETAIL FOR USE IN ALL AREAS REQUIRING IMPORT TOPSOIL PLACEMENT. PRUNEYARD PLACE Compuware Corp. Regional Offices 1919 South Bascom Blvd. Campbell, Ca. WILLIAM WILSON & ASSOCIATES San Mateo, California Developer • KENKAY ASSOCIATES Landscape Architecture t Urban Design 1045 Sansome Street - Studio 321 San Francisco, CA 94111 (415) 956-4472 (415) 956-4522 Fax Hornberger + vl�orstell, Inc. Architects k Planners 170 Maiden Lane San Francisco, California 94108 415 391 1060 2 2/22/99 CLAIRIFICATION ■ 1 5/4/98 ADDENDUM NO. 1 /11/98 ¢� PEAMR SET SET Pines �sw W2 .RiES D.- by Yee Er ra....u- �. u. a.lp..i .va ..r+Wr^ .an a W ucwa wr gym., a a ,wrcun �... > ar,�a .•m.l u. w"r .,,IYe o'rtl d IY .rt41rt1 O IWi NomMr{er . M4LL Irc PLANTING DETAILS Shrub / Onianiental Grass Planting _ Triangular Spacing Diagram Planting Area Topsoil Profile 3 4 5 scab: Y = 1' - 0" Scale: NTS Scale: NTS L,5.1 •� v Mr LEGEND K A. �. TO BE CONST. EXISTING an WMARY wft •^ -1 MIpNID CITY BARRICADE- FAMD44 WOODED INLET • A y All.WMIt DRAINAGE "JETS (TYPE AS NOTED) V M INA 0100 • aTY SURVEY MONUMENT • ,- FIRE HYDRANTS A GALE VALVE N N ELECTROLIER---Y---o PULL BCx • O P G h E SERVICE POINT m CD SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER - ROUND INLET ASSEMCLY 0 (24INLETS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) STORM MANHOLE • Q ELECTRK.AL CONDUIT -•••�� ' EDGE OF PAVEMENT ORIVEWAY t�P•�i` `---�--F� HANDICAP RAMP -.:'.. PAVING CONFORM OR OVERLAY TO FORM ZTTT77 . SMOOTH A.C. TRANSITION '6 i'_ - - KEY TO CHANGES SITE PREPARATION & GRADING NOTES 1. STE GRADING AND SITE PREPARATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOILS REPORT ENTITLED GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PREPARED BY TREADWELL k ROLLO DATED XXXXX 1997 AND THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2. THE GRADING PERFORMED HEREIN SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL 3. ALL EXISTING TREES. DEBRIS, STRUCTURES. AND ALL DELETERIOUS MATERIALS INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CONCRETE FOOTINGS, BASEMENTS, SEPTIC TANKS, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND PIPES THAT ARE TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF -SITE AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. THE DEPRESSIONS LEFT BY REMOVAL SHALL BE BACKFILLED WITH CLEAN ENGINEERED FILL N 6• TO S' LAYERS AND COMPACTED TO 9OX RELATIVE COMPAC^ON. 4. BEFORE ANY GRADING IS DONE. THE SURFACE OF THE SITE SHALL BE STRIPPED A MINIMUM OF 2. OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER TO REMOVE EXIS NG VEGETATION AND OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. STRIPPED MATERIAL THAT IS SUITABLE FOR LANDSCAPING SHALL BE STOCKPILED FOR LATER USE AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER. 5. STRIPPED SURFACE SHALL BE SCARIFIED TO A DEPTH OF NOT I ESS THAN B- AND RECOMP►1:1ED TO A MINIMUM COMPACTION OF AM AS DL'EIRMINID BY ASTM D 1557-91. FILLS SHALL BE PLACED N LIFTS NOT TO EXCEED 8' AND COMPACTED TO A MI/HIUM COMPACTION OF 9M A MINIMUM COMPACTION OF 95%SH N L BE TO A MINIMUM OF 5' BEYOND THE SQUARED OFF EPaES OF THE BUILDING AND 9OX 2' BEYOND THE CURB LINE INTO THE LANDSCAPING M:a. 6. ALL GRADIN:. SHALL CONFORM OR ')AYLIGHT WITHIN LIMITS OF BOUNDARY. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING EARTHWORK BALANCE. IF GRADE ADJUSTMENTS ARE REOUIRED, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER TO INVESTGA F SUCH ADJUSTMENTS. NO ADD17MAL COMPENSATION WMl BE ALLOWED TO CONTRACTOR AS A RESULT OF SUCH REVISIONS. 8. PAYMENT FOR •97 GRADING AND PREPARATION' SHALL INCLUDE THE '-LLOWANG IF NECESSARY: A. N THE EVENT OF SURPLUS, CONTRACTOR SHALL DISPOSE OF EXCESS MATERIAL OFFSITE AT THE CONTRACTORS EXPENSE. B. IN THE EVENT OF SHORTAGE OF MATERIAL, CONTRACTOR SHALL IRA-ORT SUITABLE FILL MATERIAL TO CONSTRUCT TO REQUIRED GRADES. 9. OWNER'S ENGINEER WILL PROVIDE ONE SET OF STAKES FOR BASIC LArOUT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF SURFACE AND UNDERGROUND IMPROVEMENTS. NOTIFY ENGINEER 48 HOURS PRIOP TO STAKING OPERATION. 10, CONTRACTOR MUST NOTIFY THE OWNER AND OWNER'S ENGINEER 48 HOURS BEFORE STARTING WORK. 11. COMPACTION TO BE DETERMINED USING ASTM D 1557/91, 12. AGGREGATE BASE SHALL CONFORM TO CLASS 2 AGGREGATE SASE PER STATE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. A. AGGREGATES SHALL BE 1-1/2- MAXIMUM C0.4FORMING TO SECTION 26 OF STATE STD. SPECIFICATIONS FOR CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE. B. CL 9 AGGREGATES SHALL CONFORM TO: TEST METHOD NO. REOIREMENTS R VALUE 3U1 78 MINIMUM SE 217 30 MINIMUM LOSS (N A RATTLER 1500 REV) 211 50 MAXIMUM DURABILITY TEST CAN BE WAIVED PROVIOFO AGGRAGATE CONFORMS TO SPECIFIED REQUIREMENTS AS NOTED. NO WAIVER OF R VALUE WILL BE ALLOWED AGGREGATES SHALL HAVE MINIMUM COMPACTION OF NOT LESS THAN 95% AS DETERMINED PER ASTM D 1557-91. 13. SLURRY SEAL SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION 37 'BIT'_ ANOUS SEALS' TYPE IL OF THE STATE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. POTHOLE AND 'VERIFY: 0ONTRACTOR SHALL POTHOLE AND VERIFY LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UNITES IN THE FIELD. LOCATIONS SHOWN UN THE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE AND FOR GENERAL INIORMATION PURPOSES ONLY. N.. PAVEMENT SECTIONS 3' ASPHALT CONCRETE ON B• CL X A.B. COMPACTED TO 95% PARKING = 71.4.5 3' ASPHALT CONCRETE ON 1'2'7'CL Y A.B. COMPACTED TO 95X '� TRUCK AREA r ti � : 71-5.5 6' CONCRETE ON 6• CL N A.B. WITH /4 • 18' O.C. BOTH WAYS 0 1/8 • SLURRY SEAL O SITE NOTES (cont'd) 14. ELEVATION CERTIFICATE IS REWIRED PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTION OF BUILDING. 15. THE BUILDING PAD MUST -BE COMPACTED TO MEET FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) CRITERION (CURRENTLY 95X RELATIVE DDISITY BY STANDARD PROCTOR TEST). 16. APPLICANT MUST FILE A NOTICE OF INTENT WITH THE REGIONAL WATER QUALITY BOARD AND SUBMIT A STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, AND IT MUS-. BE APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR THE START OF ANY WORK. 17. THE GRADINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CITYS ADOPTED BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES FOR CONSTRUCTION SITES 18, DO NOT SLI'RRY SEAL OVER EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTIONS. UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION OR INSTALLATION OF PUBLIC FACILITIES. THE DEVO_OPER'S ENGINEER SHALL ARRANGE A PRE - CONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE BETWEEN THE CONTRACTORS, AND TIME CITY PUBLIC WOWS INSPECTOR THIS SHALL TAKE PLACE A MINIMUM OF 7 DAYS PRIOR TO THE S''HEDULED START OF WORK. AT THE CONFERENCE THE DEVELOPER,, ENGINEER SHALL PRESENT THE PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR WITH A CERTIFIED COPY OF A MATERIALS US-, AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR MATERIALS THAT ARE NOT IDENTM AS CITY STANDARDS. PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION APPROVAL OF ANY NON-STANOARD MATERIALS. THE DEVELOPERS ENGINEER SHALL DEMONSTRATE TO THE CITYS PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR THAT THE NON-STANDARD MATERIALS ARE EQUAL TO. OR EXCEED CITY STANDARDS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN PERMIT •TO PERFORM EXCAVATION OR TRENCHWORK• F',.DM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. DIVISION OF INDUSTRIAL SAFETY. 100 PASEO DE SAN ANTONIO SAN JOSS. CALIFORNIA. AND FIRE COPY WITH OWNER PRIOR TO BEGINNINf: ANY TRENCH WORK. THE PERMIT, TOGETHER WITH A COPY OF THE APPROVED PLAN FOR TRENCH SAFETY BY RCGSTERED CIVIL ENGINEER, SHOULD BE MAINTAINED ON THE JOB SITE AT ALL TIMES. 3. CONSTRUCTION FOR ON -SITE STORM DRAINAGE, SANITARY AND WATER SYSTEM SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARD DETAILS AND THE STANDARD SPE:IFICA110NS nF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THESE PLANS. 4. TRENCH BACKFILL A. ON -SITE NATIVE MATERIAL MAY BE USED FOR TRENCH BACKFILL BY PLACING IN LIFTS NOT EXCEEDING 8' IN LOOSE THICKNESS AND COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 90% RELATIVE 'NPACTON BY MECHANICAL MEANS ONLY. UPPER 3' Lf TRENCH SHALL BE COMPACTED TO A MINIMUM OF 90R, EXCEPT THAT TOP 16' SHALL BE 95% CMPACTION. B. NO SAND BACKFILL SHALL BE ALLOWED. C. N ADDITION TO ABOVE. THE UPPER 6' OF ALL TRENCH BACKFILL IN PAVEMENT AREA SMALL BE COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 95X MINIMUM RELATIVE COMPACTION. D. NO COMPACTION BY JETTING SHALL BE ALLOWED 5. ALL STORM DRAINAGE PIPE SMALL BE RCP, CLASS AI, UNLESS OTHER%%M NOTED 6- ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN FOR INLETS ARE INSIDE WALL MEASUREMENT. MINIMUM THICKNESS FOR SIDE WALLS SHALL BE 5' AND BOTTOM AT 6'. BOX MAY BE PRECAST OR POURED IN FIELD. T. IN TINE EVENT Or WET UNSTABLE TRENCH BOTTOM OR GROUND T aoR CN000NIERED. DEWATERING WILL BE RLWIRED. IF OV�q CIF THE TRENCHES ARE UNSTABLE• CONTRACTOR U'llI.TE A MINIMUM OF 4• AND PROVIDE STABLE BEDDING BY PLACe c INPaWTED DRAIN ROCK OR GRANULAR CRUSHED MATERIAL. S. ALL PVC "HALL BE SCH 80 DR BETTEK AND MEET ASTM D-3034, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLAN. 9. SANITARY SERER LATERALS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF V BELOW WATER LATERALS. 10. REMOVAL AND ABONNDON OF CONCRETE SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION 15 OF THE STATE STANDARDS SPECIFICATIONS. 11. ALL WATER LINES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 3' OF COVER NOTE TO CONTRACTOR: CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES, CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR WALL BE REWIRED TO AiR1ME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR .08 SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY; THAT INS REQUIRFUENT SHALL BE MADE TO APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT '0 BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS. AND CONSTRUCION CONTRACTOR FURTHER AGREES TO DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD DESIGN PROFESSIONAL HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY. REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECTION WITH THE F'RFORMANCE OF WORK TIN THIS PROJECT, EXCEPTING LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF DESIGN PROFESSIONAL. MA S A ca oc Consul" CNWE Ergkwo" 9 Municipal Pl ►rLMrs / - Dfncss In un .hs9, CLprdn•. SsUms, Socrsw0nto, v Frawont, WcI Crook, end IMedMOOd ! city 90 Archer Street, Son .Most, C&Ufcwf 95112 408) 453-5973 ADA NOTES TITLE 24/ADA NOTES I. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH TITLE 24 OF THE CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE AND WITH THE AMrRICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. 2. CURB RAMPS SHALL NOT EXCEED A SLOPE OF 1:12 (8.33R). 3. ENTRANCE RAMPS TO BUILDINGS SHALL NOT EXCEED A SLOPE OF 1:20 (5%) UNLESS RAILINGS ARE SHOWN ON ARCHETECTURAL PLANS, IN WHICH CASE THE SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 1:12 '8.33%). 4. A 2% MAXIMUM SLOPE LANDING SHALL BE PROVIDED AT PRIMARY ENTRANCES TO BUILDINGS. THE LANDINGS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 60' AND A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 60• WHEN THE DOOR OPENS INTO THE BUILDING AND 24' PLUS THE WIDTH OF THE DOOR WHEN THE DOOR OPENS ONTO THE LANDING. 5. RAMPS ARE DEFINED AS ANY WALKWAY BETWFIN SLOPES OF 1:20 (5%) AND 1:12 (8.33%) ANL ALL HAVE A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 48' AND A MAXIMUM CROSS -SLOPE OF 2x PAMPS EXCEEDING 2'-G' VERTICAL 't DROP SHALL HAVE INTERMEDIATE (2R MAXIMUM SLOPE) LANDINGS HAV1N3 A MINIMUM LENGTH IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL OF 60•. BOTTOM LANDINGS AT CHANGES IN RAMP DIRECTION SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 72•. 6. MAXIMUM CROSS -SLOPE ON ANY SIDEWALK OR RAMP SHALL BE 21L MAXIMUM SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION WITHIN PARKING STALLS DESIGNATED AS HANDICAPPED PARKING SHALL BE 2% IN ANY DIRECTION. STORM WATER POLLIJTION NOTES 1. ALL GRADING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN PREPARED 9Y THE OWNER PER THE NOTICE OF INTENT ON FILE WITH THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD. 2. SEE SHEET C5 FOR SPECIFIC STORM 'HATER POLLUTION PREVENTION WRING CONSTRUCTION. 3. ALL INLETS SHALL BE LABLED 'NO DUMPING - DRAINS TO BAY• DURINI, CONSTRUCTION. :. ALL INLETS SHALL BE FITTED WITH FILTERS AS SHOWN IN THE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. U.S.A NOTE: ALL CONTRACTORS WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE VEWFICATION OF LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES IN THE FIELD. ALL CONTRACTORS SHALL CALL U.S.A., (CA. 1-800-(942-2444) 48 HO.A BEFORE DIGGING. FXCAVATO FOR ui,DERGROUND FAVUTIES SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED PRIOR TO CDNTAC-SING UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT. 43 r , CK A►1'IepTral MITE -'•aeV M DOW Ir• TL 7/21'97 XXXXXXX -CITY OrJm1 F�11EWT l ,JD6 AII , L 97081now THE C Iy Ras ftddler up NOTES- 1. Rb NM id be of 818jws w111111 8M bIrllmNOW IS 15-•. 2 HN •Flat/ did b aA•iRi d Id• (19 d r eYwi a Halr+i bM 91 bdw 1r 9i WIL 1 TV, d bon mom d mew lily dp Wed be elil� id lT1M �) 4. Fr 6268 r MM4 WI!s aAr ■ill red be Fad Id. LLr Flo' ildl be WOW bi w a*W -ri 0AW. ,hk b Ya/d4J>t R4II••Iliew hr e1di9Me Form MODEL ND A I 8 I C D E R10 20' 23' 1 11' 6• 4• FN 23' 25' 1 3- 16' 4' D NOTE: Top nolp 11101 ad11 to POW Is If iddli : low E •i/r Adriid dw! bW eN addle. C A e FOSSIL FILTER, PATENT PENNING LOW FN•Kw•. le. SRN ftw CA(•a) SA-4a1e STANDARD GRATE B FRAME. - PHOENIX IRON WORKS OR EQUAL FOR DRAINAGE INLETS STANDARD COVER k FRAME, PHOENIX ,RON WORKS OR EQUAL FOR JUNCTION BOXES GROW 0.17' SLOPC•T WE sH2E Lan of x WW DN . OR LESS 4• 4- NAAR �V TM TpA81AgLI X It T •A� DC A11011 13f11. , r ON. Qf LMBTS OF TYPE •B• 94 TYPE A CATEGORY OF PIPE VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE B CONCRETE PIPE T `g f 0.o0,.Q YATERNIAL�4�t4• MN.) BEDDING MAIM CRUSHED S NLLCOBNWITH THE 092 CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATION 1301-2. PIPE BEDDING DETAIL CURB LINE APPROVED NATIVE BACKFILL MATERIAL 2 SO REL COMPACTION AC TO DRAIN AWAY FROM VERTICAL CURB ALL LOCATIONS. CURB FACE T APPLY AC 0• - • • • PAINT BINDER (TYP) AC PAVING i CL 11 A a I W fr > EXTEND 4• BELOW BOTTOM OF SUBBASE 2 TOTAL) VERTICAL CURB N.T.S. CURB LINE WT'ER LINE R-1/2tTOP OF CURB ELF1 SIUC(q PER 1-3/4. a OftT, SPECS 13' r eGLITTER ' ELEV - LIP OF W E V INSTALL ^4 WATER BARR;ER IN LANDSCAPE AREA CURB & GUTTER W1 PLASTIC WATER BARRIER N.T.S. Anchor Frame '-to Concrete Cella with Hook around ReOor HooP. M Y � Vc PIPE RINGS AWs oround u, Concrete Collar. + e • FLOW LINE • . n a N -CUSS •A' P.C.C. BASE 1 YP ROUND INLET ASSEMBL'T N. T. S. NOTES : PRECAST CONCRETE PIPE GRADE RINGS SHALL BE CLASS III MIN ALL JOINTS SHALL BE FILLED WITH GROUT (1 PART CEMENT, 2 PARTS SAND) AND NEATLY POINTED h WIPED INSIDE BASIN. DETAIL ADJACENT TO CURB & GUTTER N. T. S. /� MMI 1 LLD - ILCCJS1EiJC9 CIHIS CMWBB.L III,(. IQ 143N - Exr 07/2.1/• AC PAVING - CL 11 A.B. m PRUNE I MO NOTES ell LEGM 11 ■s Clry0', PIgNN14GOYP -C a' 4 1999 S. BASCOM AVE. S 9 7-2U/ UP 9 7-1 1 6 OF 9 C 1 1')' OF C,AM1)B1"'..1, PLAN . 1 2/99 Planning Commission Minutes of November 11, 1991 Page 5 _ Commissioner Gibbons asked if there would be trees in between the properties. Ms. Gloria Sciara answered that there would not be trees but a trellis feature is proposed. Commissioner Lowe asked if the required setbacks are the same as residential. Ms. Gloria Sciara replied that that was not the case. Mr. Steve Piasecki added that residential setbacks are different from commercial. He advised that the Commission can consider landscaping additions. He added that the garage structure is actually adjacent to the carports rather than living units. Commissioner Gibbons stated her concern for s.-urity relative to the access to the Creek Trail should it be located where it is hidden from view by the parking structure. Commissioner Lowe presented the Site and Architectural Review Committee report as follows: • SARC met and reviewed this project on October 30, 1997. • While SARC is genera;ly supportive, there are concerns about some of the architectural features including the beige color not being a suitable one for the parking garage. Additionally SARC is not supportive of the green roof, the facade of the new office tower or the use of concrete grids. • The City's Architectwa! Advisor does not find the new office tower to be compatible and finds the pre cast concrete material proposed to be more suitable to industrial uses than commercial and retail. • SARC cannot support the project as submitted. Comrn:ssroner Lindstrom stated that he suppors the project with the exception of the color scheme. Commissioner Lowe said that the hotel is acceptable. The officc and garage design needs more work. Chairwoman Kearns opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 2. Mr. Michael Hunt, 1999 S. Bascom Avenue: • Advised that he has been a tenant at the Pruneyard Towers for the last 20 years. • Expressed concerns regarding parking. The lot is full already. His customers and employees need parking. What will happen during construction. • Said that he had been told that the parking garage would be completed first and asked that that occur. • Asked whether parking fees would be possible once the new garage is built. • Stated that he had learned of tonight's hearing today. • Stated that there has been no big campaign to speak of parking issues with the tenants. • Said that he has h^_ard that busing of employees from off -site parking lots is proposed. Planning Commission Minutes of November 11, 1997 Page 6 • Said that he just wants to be sure that the site is left with adequate parking when everything is done. • Advised that his main concern is that parking is available during construction. Commissioner Gibbons suggested that Mr. Hunt make contact with the Pruneyard management a., there are certain things only the management can do. She stated that the staff report has information regarding parking issues. Mr. David Word, Applicant, Pruneyard Associates: • Stated that their tenants are "precious to us." • Stated the his staff had delivered copies of the meeting notice -,o ten3nts regarding this evening's meeting today. • Said that they plan to hold numerous meetings with the tenants and their employees but that the timing and forum would be more appropriate when they have an approved project. They wanted to put the cart after the horse. • Gave background. In April 1994, a private partnership bought the Pr ncyard which was going down hill. Three years ago, the center was only half leased with S25 million in sales. They aspired to double that and have done so. • Clarified that at the present time they have t.`tree retail spaces vacant. One is adjacent to the movie theater and the other two are failed -estaurants on the second floor. The project was only 50% leased when they bought it. • The hotel had generated approximately 5150,000 in tax which is now $400,000 per year. With the expansion, it is anticipated that the tax revenues will climb by another 5200,000 per year to a total of 5600,000 • Said the increase is a reflection of the market but stated that they have "shepherded out stewardship." • Advised that the Vmiect is two pronged. The first prong is the office tower and garage. The second prong is the hotel expansion. • Said that they have a loan commitment from Bank of America as well as private capital. • The scheduling of the project is contingent on receiving approvals but they have been working on the project for a long period of time. • Some of the scheduling is driven by the backorder; of steel fabrication. They have ordered steel for May 1998 delivery The foundation would start earlier, in March. • They aspire to have the office building occupied by the middle of the first quarter of 1999. They already have a tenant, Compuware, V: ich may end up leasing up to 75% of the new office tower. They have a 15-year lease commitment. • They expect the garage construction, which is not steel framed but rather concrete, to take eight months for construction with an anticipated completion by November 1998. • Demolition of the former retail space for the hotel expansion and subsequent construction is expected to be finalized by Fall 1998. • Parking Management Studies were conducted to determine how much parking is needed, how to cordon off parking during construction, how to utilize valet parking and how to provide shuttle service for employees. There will be no charge for the use of the sht_ttle Planning Commission Minutes of November 11, 1997 gage 7 service. No one would be forced to use the shuttle but would have to utilize the valet parking. • Stated that his architects are available to discuss controversial architectural f hire . They have brought a project site model. • Advised that he has not had a chance to review the revisions to the findings and conditions which were distributed this evening to the Commission. He has not seen them yet. • Stated that he has comments regarding some of the conditions. • Advised that the garage snucmuc will be located on the northern property line and would be adjacent to a utility field owned by the Water District and would not be towering over the apartment building. • Stated that he misunderstood the extent of SARC's concerns. He thought they had walked away from SARC with the decision (2-1) that the color was appropriate even if it was not favored by one member. He thought SARC's big issue was additional landscaping. • Expressed concern about having to come back to SARC and the Commission for approval of colors and materials. • Questioned the concerns about the shape of the penthouse feature. • Advised that the material board samples are very small and it is hard to envision proportionally what the materials will actually look like • The pre cast concrete has lots of aggregate which is sandblasted. Took issue with the comment that this material is both incompatible and inappropriate. Said that the material is used on the San Jose Fairmont Hotel. • Said that reasonable people can disagree. • Suggested that he would work with staff to find another Creek Trail access point but questioned the u : of an access that essemially dumps people onto private property. • Stated that the path along Highway 17 beside the proposed garage is 16 feet wide. • Questioned the suggestion for security cameras. Asked if they were present in other garages, including the City's garages. Wondered who would monitor the cameras. • Advised that there is security at Pruneyard but the security guards are walking the property and not monitoring cameras. • Stated that policy issues to consider including liability, insurance and the implication that the site is safe due to the placement of security cameras. Commissioner Lowe asked why the proposed tower is not centered between the two existing towers? Mr. David Word: • Advised that fire access and parking issues played a part. • Said that he would defer to his architects. • Reminded that the existing two structures arc not centered. Mr. Charles Missler, Architect, Homberger & Worstell: • Explained that a 40-foot separation is required between the new tower ,nd Tower 1. • They have developed a pinwheel plan which offers more dimension. Planning Commission Minutes of November 11 1997 Pace 8 Commissioner Lowe asked whether the Police Department has looked into the need for security cameras. Ms. Gloria Sciara answered that the issue was discussed with Police but the wording in the conditions of approva! did not come from them. Rather the issue of security cameras was raised during the Study Session with the City Council. There was concern about blocked visibility with the addition of this parking structure. Commissioner Lowe asked if there were other parking areas with cameras. Ms. Gloria Sciara replied no. The issue is security for people using the garage and users of the Creek Trail access. Security is needed both during the day and at right for the garage while the Trail closes at dusk. Mr. Steve Piasecki added that this will be the largest parking garage in the City. A complete sense of security is desired. At the present time, the parking lot is wide open which offers visibility to the Trail access. When the garage structure is in place, this will no longer be the case. Other security alternatives to the cameras can be discussed. Chairwoman Kearns added that even if there was no trail access, there would be security concerns for the users of the garage Commissioner Lindstrom asked what thoughts Mr. Word had regarding security Mr. David Word: • Stated that valid issues have been raised but wondered if security should be a condition of approval for the project • Said that security concerns can be handled with lighting. They plan to over -light the garage, going way beyond code requirements. • Additionally advised that Pruneyard security is available, to escort people to their cars. • Described another project where alarm systems were considered but then decided against by the tenant who had asked for it. • Advised that there have been just a couple of auto break-ins in the existing parking area. There have been no crimes against persons • Again wondered who would be monitoring the security cameras. Commissioner Gibbons asked if a precedent is in place for the continued Trail access which generates trail users onto private property. City Attorney William Seligmann advised that an easement had been explored but never was obtained. There is no obligation to continue. Commissioner Gibbons: • Stated that the proposed passage way to the Creek Trail access is not the most inviting. • Expressed concern that there is no access tr. the parking garage at that point. Planning Commission Minutes of November 11 1997 Page 9 • Said that she would support an access point to the garage near the Creek Trail access so that if people using the Creek Trail access feel endangered, they can enter the well -lighted garage. Mr. David Word advised that he had no objection to creating that access to the garage however someone can use it to access the garage with ill intent. He is willing to explore this idea Commissioner Gibbons: • Stated that it,, projects she has worked on in the past, entrances were included in each comer of the garage so that no one can be comered. • Advised that she had used a panic alarm in a garage structure and found it both gratifying and reassuring • Said that while the security cameras are in the best interests of this project, she did not support the inclusion of the requirement for cameras in the conditions of approval. Commissioner Lowe stated that he concurred. Commissioner Lindstrom asked if there is a security plan in place for the frequency of patrol for the parking structure. Ms. Virginia Unruh, Senior Property Manager, The Pruneyard: • Advised that currently, security patrols are conducted on foot and by car. • Patrols around the property occur on regular intervals. • Additional numbers of security personnel will be added when the project is expanded. Commissioner Lindstrom asked for assurance that lots of lighting is proposed. Ms. Virginia Unruh assured the Commission that lots of lighting will be incorporated into the parking structure. Commissioner Gibbons advised that the amount of lighting is not mandated by code. Lighting fixtures can range from 1/2-foot to 2-foot candle. Commissioner Francois asked about the frequency of patrol checks. Ms. Virginia Unruh reported that patrols occur every hour and can be increased and/or decreased as needed in the future. Mr. David Word asked Commissioner Gibbons for her twornmendation on the lighting fixtures. Commissioner Gibbons answered that this would not be appropriate. Commissioner Meyer -Kennedy asked about Condition No. 38 which pertains to Car Detailing System. Asked why this is included. Plannin¢ Commission Minutes of Novembe- ! 1, 1997_ Page 10 Ms. Gloria Sciara replied that currently there are mobile auto detailing services provided in the parking lot for tenants of the building. A permanent station will be included in the new parking structure On -site containment of waste water is required so that no non -point source pollution occurs. Commissioner Lindstrom questioned the on -site circulation. Mr. David Word advised that a Traffic Consultant has worked out circulation. Mr. Peter Eakland, Traffic Engineer, City of Campbell: • A parking lane will be created to accommodate off-loading of trucks at the Outback Steakhouse. Currently the trucks block the lane of traffic near the Outback. • The circulation plan will balance the flow of traffic to the parking structure. • The benefits to the circulation will offset the loss of a few parking spaces. Mr. David Word advised that he is willing to work with staff regarding the elimination of some parking spaces near the Outback and Left at Albuquerque restaurants to accommodate parking lanes for unloading delivery trucks. Commissioner Gibbons asked what size the p L -u.i; stalls would be in the parking structure. Mr. David Word advised that there would be "Unisex" stalls which are neither compact nor full size. Mr. Charles Missler, Architect, advised that the size is 8 1 /2 by 18 feet with a 25-foot drive aisle. Commissioner Gibbons asked if all would be the same size. Mr. Peter Eakland advised that staff supports using the "Unisex" parking stalls. The cost of parking space in a garage is more expensive. Most cars are now mid -size. There are fewer huge cars and fewer Honda Civic -sized cars. Commissioner Gibbons advised that when built, the garage may have up to 5% fewer spaces than planned. Mr. Ron McLester, Architect, Homberger & Worstell, advised that they started out with a plan for 800 spaces. the current plan for 737 is close to reality and is specific. The plan has been laid out several times. Commissioner Gibbons asked if detailed plans are available, what the turning radius will be and whether there are barriers at the ends of each aisle. Mr. David Word replied that they may lose some pinking with a tough radius. However, a parking study by a third -party consultant has determined that there are 125 more spaces than required to support this expansion. Planning Commission Minutes of November 11, 1997 Page I 1 Commissioner Gibbons stated that she has concerns about the parking on site. Asked why there are no disabled parking spaces on the ground floor of the parking structure. Advised that covered parking must be provided for the disabled when covered parking is provided for non -disabled. Mr. Ron McLester advised that covered parking will be provided for disabled parking elsewhere on site. Commissioner Gibbons cautioned Mr. McLester that this is an ADA requirement. Commissioner Lowe asked who enforces the ADA requirements. Commissioner Gibbons: • Advised that the enforcement occurs with the issuance of building permits. • Stated that not enough detail is being provided and that the Commission is being asked to take a lot on faith. • Said that parking is an issue and that 25 to 50 stalls could be lost. • The proposed ratio for this new tower is 1:380 while the recent Winchester Dive -In site was required to provide a 1:280 ratio. Mr. Ron McLester advised that there are two ratios at the Pruneyard. The effice use ratio is 1:380 while the retail use ratio is 1:260. These are fairly standard and the consultant has found them to be typical. Mr. David Word: • Advised that retail needs a higher parking ratio and has it. • Reminded that this site is in an Overlay District with shared parking. • They are adding 400 spaces. The additional parking is adequate for the office expansion. Ms. Jennifer Filzeu, Tenant at Aloha Apartments, 1845 S. Bascom Avenue: • Asked if the owners of the Aloha Apartments are aware of the requirement for the Campisi Way extension. Mr. Steve Piasecki advised that no apartment building will be involved. Parking would be removed and made up elsewhere. Advised that ire owners are aware of the planned expansion. It is included within the City's General Plan. Ms. Jennifer Filzen: • Said that she has lived at the Aloha apartments for three years and fords it to be a safe location which she loves. She appreciates the fact that there are 25 restaurants within walxing distance. • Stated that she has issues with the Pruneyard already as the noise level is quite bad. • The driveway between the apartments and the Pruneyard has people speeding and squealing tires. Motorcycles race down the dri•: eway. • Wondered if the noise level meets Ordinance requirements. • Stated that the proposed additions will only make noise worse. Planning Commission Minutes of November 11, 1997 Page 12 • Said that while the complex is fully leased now, there is no guarantee that it will stay folly occupied. • There are already parking problems or site. • The parking structure will be visible and could be a safety issue. • Lighting in the parking structure could become an annoyance to the Aloha residents. • Advised that she does use the Creek Trail at night at least twice a week and feels that the garage could create a hazard due to increased risk. • Said that there have already been problems on the Creek Trail includu,g a bicycle -grouper who was grabbing at women using the trail and the discovery of a woman's body in a trash bin located adjacent to the Trail. • Even if a camera is in place, there is no guarantee that anyone would be watching who could assist in the event that something occurs. Commissioner Lowe asked Ms. Filzen whether she utilizes th-- access from the Pnmeyard to the Creek Trail. hls. Jennifer Filzen • Replied that she accesses from Campisi near the AAA Building. • Said that the Trail is populated and very sale. • Said that the parking garage is not attractive and would be visible from the apartments. • The car detailing system could result in a mess in the sewer systems. • The eight spaces proposed to be removed near the Welis Fargo ATM would be missed. • Stated that her complex is a wonderful one with maiy tenants having lived there for 15 to 20 years. It is affordable and the units are attractive. • The proposed additions to the Pruneyard are risky. • Stated that she is not against growth but wants peace, quiet and parking for all. Ms. Kristen Nielsen, Aloha Apartments Tenant, 1845 S. Bascom Avenue: • Asked if a sound study has been done. • Wondered if a joint effort between the Pruneyard and the Aloha Apartments could result in the installation of double paned wind:rws. Mr. David Word: • Advised that a sound study was conducted by a third party acoustical engineering firm. • Readings were taken over a 24-hour period. • After pr.-Jecting noise impacts from the hotel and office additions, the consultant has found that the use will meet current Campbell Ordinances. • Advised that the lighting will be shielded from the adjacent property owners and is called for in the conditions of approval. Mr. Steve Piasecki advised that the Environmental Consultant is present. Planning Commission Minutes of November 11 1997 Page 13 Ms. Kathy Kovar, David 1. Powers & Associates, Inc.: • Advised that noise measurements averag:d 65-70 Idn at the Aloha Apartments. Some of the noise can be attributed to Highway 17. • The proposed use can cause an increase of 1 to 2 Idn. It would take doubling the traffic at the Prur,eyard to raise the level by 3 Idn. Commissioner Lowe asked about possible mitigation measures. Ms. Kathy Kovar replied that since the apartments are three -stories high a sound wall is not an option. Commissioner Lowe asked what percentage of the noise levels can be attributed to the Pruneyard. Ms. Kathy Kovar replied that this is not known and no guess is feasible. Commissioner Lowe asked what is a healthy noise level. Ms Kathy Kovar answered below 60 Idn is the desired level for residential. Severe hearing impacts can occur at 80 Idn. Commissioner Gibbons stated that levels for sleeping are considered to be 40 Idn. Ms. Kathy Kovar reminded the Commission that the readings were taken from the driveway of the complex. Mr. Michael Hunt, Tenant, .999 S. Bascom: • Asked that attention be given to security at the off -site parking locations during the period of construction to ensure the safety of his employees. Mr. David Word: • Stated that Mr. Hunt has made a good point about security and it will be added to the plan. • Advised that the shuttle program will occur only during the construction phase. • Said that AMPCO Parking will run the parking program. • Regarding the sound levels, readings were taken at the property boarders as close as possible. • Advised that the readings at night were well under. • Much of the noise can be attributed to Highway 17 and Bascom Avenue. • Stated that the sound levels should be somewhat less inside the units at the Aloha Apartments. Mr. Craig Larsen, Tenant, Aloha Apartments, 1845 S. Bascom Avenue: • Stated that he has lived in the complex for seven years and has seen an increase in noise levels. There is a lot of traffic in the driveway • Suggested that slowing down traffic by installing larger speed bumps might help lower noise. • Neither a sound will nor trees will help. Plannin¢ Commission Minutes of November 11, 1997 Paite 14 • Suggested that the noise level numbers may be artificially low. • While his unit is not near the driveway, he has concerns for the residents of the units next to the Pruneyard driveway. • There are noise and light issues and parking is already not adequate. • Suggested that the noise problem should be looked at as peak noise instead of average noise. Commissioner Lowe stated that the Commission had imposed time restrictions for Left at Albuquerque's outdoor dining hours. He asked Mr. Larsen whether thost restrictions are working. Mr. Craig Larsen replied that the outdoor dining is not an issue as far as noise. Conunissioner Gibbons asked about the hotel expansion. Mr. David Word: • Advised that they will demolish 19,000 square feet of former retail space (currently vacant) which is two -stories and replace it with three-story hotel space for a total of 54 units. Commissioner Gibbons asked if there would be hotel rooms at ground level. Mr. David Word replied that there would be hotel rooms at ground level. Commissioner Gibbons opined that it will be in Lie best interests of the Pruncyard to have quiet also Mr. David Word replied that was correct. Commissioner Gibbons sought clarification regarding the project schedule. The parking structure would begin first, with completion in November 1998. The hotel would begin second with completion in October or November 1998. The office tower would begin last. Mr. David Word advised that work on the hotel would begin in January 1998 and open in September 1998. Commissioner Gibbons asked if construction on the garage would begin in January. Mr. David Word ..aced that construction on the garage would begin in March 1998. Commissioner Gibbons stated that the steel would arrive around May 1998 but that foundation work for the office tower would begin in March 1998. The garage foundation would being in March 1998 also. Parking spaces will be lost during this time. Ms. Jeanne Shook-Arterberry: • Advised that AMPCO has conducted a study and prepared a plan for the provision of parking during construction. Plannin¢ Commission Minutes of November 11 1997 Pagc 15 — • AMPCO has identified areas where stacking will be possible. • There will be a shortage of 100 spaces for w!dch off -site parking will have to be located. Commissioner Gibbons asked how many spaces would be displaced. Ms. Jeanne Shook-Arterberry answered 400. Commissioner Gibbom questioned that the applicants have been able to condense 300 spaces on site? Ms. Jeanne Shook-Arterberry replied that was correct. Mr. David Word reiterated that of 400 spaces, they will be short 100. He added that a number of the spaces located where the new garage will be construction were not used. The.e were always a number of spaces not being utilized in this area of the parking lot. Commissioner Gibbons stated that there will be three major construction sites. Construction workers will number more than 100. Mr. David Word answered that an agreement is in place that the construction workers cannot park on site. They are working with WebCor Builders. Chairwoman Kearns asked where the off -site parking is located. Mr. Dai'id Word replied that they are in negotiations with the owners of the site at Hamilton and Creekside, depending upon when their construction begins; with the Downtown City garage at the Water Tower; a lot on Union and with the owners of a vacant lot on Bascom Avenue next to Tower Records. Commissioner Kearns replied that good issues are raised. There will be three major construction projects at the same time. Commissioner Gibbons stated that it is very ambitious. Mr. David Word wondered about the condition for Graffiti Abatement requiring the recordation of a covenant. Asked if the City does this on its own property. Asked why not develop an Ordinance. Commissioner Gibbons suggested that the garage be constructed so that an extension of the top Floor can be accommodated in the future. Wondered if it is possible to have an open gauge within 10 feet of a property line. Is not 20 feet required' Mr. Ron McLester advised that this has been confirmed with Building Chairwoman Kearns asked if the remaining Conditions are acceptable Planning Commission Minutes of November 11, 1997 — Page 16 Mr. David Word: • Replied that essentially they were acceptable. • Stated that they agree to a fpir share of traffic mitigation measures. • Said that he feels that agrem.r.,nt on a sum to be set aside for the City's use within a set of dates is necessary. • Said that no agreement on a dollar amount has been reached. Commissioner Lowe asked if Mr. Word prefers a percentage to a set fee. Mr. David Word replied no. Mr. Steve Piasecki advised that it is hoped that this issue would be resolved prior to the City Council hearing on this project. Commissioner Lowe expressed his opposition to the treatment of the front elevation with pre cast concrete. Chairwoman Kearns stated that she did not care for the color scheme at all. She said that the building "sticks out like a sore thumb." Commissioner Meyer -Kennedy said that she believes the building will tie in. Additionally, lots of landscaping and use of trellis will be utilized. Commissioner Lindstrom asked what the building is supposed to look like. Mr Charles Missler, Architect: • Stated that they had two options. To create a completely new look or to blend and/or compliment with the existing buildings. • Every attempt has been made to match tone, scale and detail. They proposed bronze aluminum, bronze reflective glass, infilled dark black spangle glass. The center structure will use the same materials but include the introduction of vertical mullions. • Said that they have tried to pull in the best elements of the project. Commissioner Gibbons stated that this reinforces the lack of integration to introduce new elements. Again said there is lots of information they just do not have. Mr. Charles Missler, Architect, stated that they have knitted the project together. Mr. Ron McLester, Architect: • Stated that they am aware of grade elevations but that it is too arty to make grade on drawings. • They plan to go into the comer and raise the elevation of paving. Planning Commission Minutes of November 11. 1997 Paec 17 Commissioner Gibbons stated that she does not mind pre cut concrete. However, Towers I an-' II are both very smooth while proposed Tower III is very textured. Said that she has a lot of trouble with the broken pedement, color, materials and shape. Mr. Charles Missler, Architect, stated that there is a great deal of visibility from the two taller towers of the roof of this new tower. Mr. Ron McLester, Architect, said that they are fortunate to close in the mechanical equipment. The shape works well for its function. It helps with the goal to try to create a central focus emphasis. Commissioner Gibbo.ts stated that she is still not happy with the solution and also expressed concerns about the parking garage. Mr. Charles Missler, Architect, said they have two options. One, they can enrich the concrete work and include a detailed parapet. Two, they can add more landscaping, layering it. Commissioner Gibbons stated that she has a problem with the proportions of the stair tower on the garage. Chairwoman Kearns asked if the texture of the garage is smooth. Mr. Charles Missler replied that it was smooth. Mr. Steve Piasecki advised that the actual office tower will be darker than depicted on the renderings. They were lightened to demonstrate the details. Commissioner Gibbons stated she was uncomfortable with the details and color of the garage and with the roof termination including shape, color and material. She suggested that the plaza in front of the new office tower be extended further cut by removal of five parking spaces. Commissioner Lindstrom asked why it is important to connect more than they already are? Commissioner Gibbons: • Replied that currently these are strong, black vertical masses. • Said that this is a super project with a superb tenant and a great complex. • The City and applicants can put more effort to come together to more strongly tie this building into the project. • The current design isolates the new building from others. Commissioner Lindstrom asked if a walkway alrudy exists around Tower I? Mr. Charles Missler replied that it does. Planning Commission Minutes of November 11 1997 Page 1 g Commissioner Lindstrom stated that the proposed changes do not connect the project any more than it is already connected. Chairwoman Kearns suggested a continuance. Commissioner Gibbons asked what the applicant thought about a continuance. Mr. David Word: • Said that they have done on site what they can afford to do. • Asked what the Commission would like. • Said that while he has heard from three Commissioners, he would like to hear from the others. • Said that the penthouse design offers a practical way to enclose mechanical equipment. If not, they can simply box the equipment in. • They can study the proportions of the stair and elevator tower in the garage structure. • The landscape architect requested a light paint color to serve as a backdrop for the plant materials. Would like to plant Redwoods along Highway 17. A light color inside the garage would make it seem brighter. • Asked for guidance. Commissioner Meyer -Kennedy: • Said that she attended the SARC meeting. • She is comfortable with the colors. • Finds that the landscape will enhance the site. • Likes the green color. • Wants to see Redwood trees at the Leeway. • Likes the new building, the pre cast concrete and the colors. • Thinks the project is a good one as it is. Commissioner Lindstrom: • Said that a perfect settlement is not possible. This project is as close to perfect as it is going to get. • The project fits in well. • It has its own flavor while still in context. • They have done as good a job as they can. Commissioner Jones: • Says that the project looks fine. • Said that he wishes he could make the garage disappear. • The color should make it look anal] and less intrusive as possible. • Wants to see Redwoods along Highway 17. • Stated he is supportive and in favor of this project. Plannin¢ Commission Minutes of November 11. 1997 Paae 19 Commissioner Francois: • Compatibility is the key issue. • Said that this is a wonderful project and he supports it Commissioner Lowe: • Stated that he supports most of the project except for the use of pre cast concrete. • Said that he agreed with Commissioner Gibbon's pizza expansion suggestions. • If the project is approved, said that he wants to we the conditions regarding graffiti and security cameras removed. Commissioner Gibbons: • Said that she wants to see a proposal that ties the buildings together. • Said that she would want to review the conditions one by one. • Stated that the hotel expansion is fine. • Stated that the office is acceptable with conditions that include the return to SARC with a different roof rendering. • Said that the plaza is not correct aria should be extended using similar materials. • Said that she i.: not comfortable with the garage and believes there is not enough information provided. • Stated that she could support the office tower and hotel but not the garage. Commissioner Lowe asked Commissioner Gibbons what her issues are with the garage? Commissioner Gibbons: • The forms, textures of the exterior. • The color. • The landscape which appears forced formal when nothing else on the site is formal. • Stated that she is not comfortable. • Wants to have one more pass at a review with more details provided. Chairwoman Kearns stated her agreement with Commissioner Gibbons. She is not crazy about the roof and does not believe the buildings tie in together. Chairwoman Kearns closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 2. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Lindstrom, seconded by Comrdssioner Meyer -Kennedy, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 3134 recommending approval of a Special Develop- vat Permit (SPD 97-01); a Site and Arcbltectural Approval (S 97-20) to aBow the contraction of a six -story, 130.000 square foot office building and a four -level parking garage and approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, oa property located at 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, with the removal of Conditions of Approval No. 37 and 38, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Frncols, Gibbons, ]ones, Lindstrom, Meyer-Keaaedy Planning Commission Minutes of November 11 1997 Pa a 20 NOES: Kearns, Lowe ABSENT: Nome ABSTAIN: Nome Commissioner Gibbons realized chit she had misunderstood the motion and voted differently than she had intended. City Attorney William Seligman advised that she could submit a motion to reconsider SDP 97- 01. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Gibbons, seconded by Commissioner Kearns, the Planning Cnmmisslnn moved to reconsider SDP 97-01. (7-0) Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Lindstrom, seconded by Commissioner Meyer -Kennedy, the Plaguing Commission adopted Resolution No. 3134 recommending approval of a Special Development Permit (SPD 97-01); a Site and Architectural Approval (S 97-20) to allow the construction of a six -story, 130,000 square foot office building and a four -level parking garage and approval of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, on property located at 19" S. Bascom Avenue, with the removal of Conditions of Approval No. 37 and 38, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Francois, Jones, Lindstrom, Meyer -Kennedy NOES: Gibbons, Kearns, Lowe ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Nore Motion: Upon motion of Cummissioner Lindstrom, seconded by Commissioner Meyer -Kennedy, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 3135 approving a Conditional Use Permit (UP 97-I1) to allow a 54-room hotel expansion on property located at 1875 S. Bascom Avenue, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Francois, Gibboj:a, Jones, Kearns, Lindstrom, Lowe, Meyer - Kennedy NOES: Nome ABSENT: Nome ABSTAIN: Nome Mr. Steve Piasecki advised the Commission that the Special Development Permit (SDP 97-10) arvi Site Approval (S 97-20) will be forwarded to Council at its mating of December 8, 1997. The Use Permit is final unless appealed in writing to the City Clerk within 10 days. Chairwoman Kearns asked how graffiti is handled without a covenant Planning Commis ion Minorca of November 11 1997 Pace 21 Mr. Steve Piasecki replied that the sane system used just take more time to resolve, throughout the City would apply but that it �P4�T OF 7'H� COMMUNrITY DF�sr nun The written report of Mr. Steve Ptaseeki, Community Development opmeat Director, wasaccepted as AD]O 1stIvMF*TT' The Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 11:15 p.m. to the P meeting of November 25, 1997, in the Council Chain North CoCommissionbas Campbell, Califomia. City Hall, 70 NNorth First Stint L ' SUBMITTED BY: Corinne A. Shi d Ink, Recording Secrnary APPROVED BY: Susan A.,Keatna, ATTEST: \ Steve iasecki, Secretary ITEM NO.2 STAFF R' i - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 11, 1"7 SDP 97-01/S 97.20 Public Hearing to consider the application of Mr. David Word, on behalf UP97.11 of William Wilson and Associates, for approval of a Special Word, D. Development Permit (SDP 97-01) and a Site and Architectural Application (S 97-20) to construct a 130,000 square foot, six -story office building and a four -level parking garage, on property located at 19" - Rascom Avenue in a C-2-0 (General Commercial/Overlay) Zor, d -'^tc and a Use Permit for a 54-room hotel expansion on rfof -y located at 1875 S. Bascom Avenue in a C-2-S (General Con, :,-rcial) Zoning District. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission take the following action: I. Adopt a Resolution, incorporating the attached findings, recommending that the City Council approve a Special Developm^,it Permit, and a Site and Architectural application to allow construction of a 6 story office building, and a four level parking garage subject to the attached conditions of approval; and �. RECOMMEND that the City Council grant a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Special Development Permit application; and 3. Adopt a Resolution, incorporating the attached findings, approving a Use Permit and Site and Architectural permit to allow a 54-room hotel expansion, subject to the attached conditions of approval. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with CEQA, an Expanded Initial Study was prepared for this project under the City's direction by the consulting firm of David J. Powers and Associates. The results of the study determined that no significant environmental impacts would be created as a result of the proposed project, subject to the implementation of specified mitigation measures. A traffic report was prepared as par of the initial study and concludes that the project will generate additional traffic but it will not result in significant environmental impacts. Based on the information provided in the environmental assessment, staff has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project. Clarifications to the Expanded Initial Study are also attached. A Negative Declaration adopted in 1995 for the remodel of the Pruneyard included a 50 room expansion of the Hotel and was included in the background scenario of the current Expanded Initial Stud). The expansion of the 54 rooms does not represent a significant alteration of the assumptions for the previous Negative Declaration. Therefore, no mitigation for the hotel expansion is proposed. Staff Report -- Planning Commission Meeting of November 11, 1997 SDP 97-Ol/S 97-20/UP 97-1 1 — 1875 and 1999 S. Bascom Avenue — Pruneyard Place DISCUSSION Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is requesting approval of a Special Development Permit and a Site and Architectural Approval to construct a 130,000 gross square foot, six -story office building between the two existing office towers, a four level parking garage structure at the northwest comer of the property, and the continuation of shared on -site parking facilities. The applicant is also requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow a 54-room expansion of a hotel use and site and architectural approval of the proposed design. Project Background: The Pruneyard is a mixed -use property situated on 27.2 net acres located at the northwest comer of Bascom Avenue and Campbell Avenue. The property was originally developed in the early 1970's, and consists of one 18 story high-rise office building containing 116,743 square feet ,Tower 1) and one ten story high-rise office building of approximately 117,476 square feet (Tower B) on the western half of the property. The eastern portion of the property is developed with retail shopping center and movie theaters consisting of approximately 256,000 square foot. The 118 room hotel at the northern end of the shopping center was constructed in 1989. A major remodel of the shopping center was completed in 1996 by the current owners, William Wilson and Associates, that included reconfiguration of th^ site and building layout, facade and landscaping improvements, and two new single user pad buildings (Bank of America and Outback Steakhouse). A Use Permit for a 50 room hotel expansion was also approved with the remodel, however, the hotel addition was nr instructed prior to the expiration of the use permit. The attached project data sheet (see attachr tails the building square footage, parcel size and parking. The site is primarily flat and is located adjacent to offices, retail, and multi -family uses to the south on Campbell Avenue: retail and restaurant uses to the east on Bascom Avenue; an apartment complex bordering the northem property line, and State Highway 17 borders the west side of the property. Access to the Los Gatos Creek trail is also located at the northwest comer of the property. ANALYSIS General Plan Consistency: The General Plan Land Use designation is commercial. The proposed development applications are consistent with the General Plan designation. Zoning Consistency: The site maintains two zoning designations. The eastern portion of the property with the shopping center and hotel is zoned C-2-S (General Commercial). The western half of the property containing the office development is zoned C-2-0 (General Commercial/Overlay). The Overlay zone allowed a "high rise" concept for the office buildings. A Special Development Permit must be approved by the City Council for alterations, additions or new construction to all properties with this designation. Under the C-2-S zoning district, the hotel expansion requires a use permit and site and architectura! approval. Office: The Sp vial Development Permit incorporates a third office tower, and parking garage. Approximately 50% of the new office building is anticipated to provide office space for Compuware Corporation. The remainder of the building will be leased for general office use. Amenities within the proposed building include a 2,800 square foot cafe and a 2,900 square foot fitness center. Staff Report --Planning Commission Meeting of November 11, 1997 SDP 97-01/S 97-201UP 97-1 1 -- 1999 S. Bascom Avenue — Pruneyard Place Parking Garage: The parking garage will provide free parking to employees, hotel guests, and patrons of the Pruneyard. A car detailing station is proposed on a limited time basis near the ground level ramp. The garage will be available 24 hours a day, and will not be attended or installed with parking control equipment. A security system for the interior of the parking garage has not been indicated. recommends that a security system be provided in the parking garage as a safety precaution. A condition of approval has been added reflecting this recommendation. Hotel: The general operations of the hotel will remain the same. However, approximately 5-6 additional employees would be added during the daytime shift to service the increased number of hotel rooms proposed. The access to the hotel rooms will continue to be provided through the hotel lobby. No additional access would be available from the northern side of the hotel facing the apartments. Staff Shared Parking: The proposal incorporates the continuation of shared parking facilities. A detailed parking discussion is provided later in this report. SITE/BUILDING DESIGN Office Building: The proposed 75 foot, 130,000 square foot six story office building is located toward the westerly property line, between the two office towers. The location of the new office tower links the two existing buildings, and creates the third side of a U-shaped "court" created by it and the two existing towers. The proposed building is rectangular in form, and is composed in three segments. The two ends of the new building repeat the glass wall exterior of the two adjacent towers matching the color and composition of building materials. The center portion of the building is differentiated by a pre -cast concrete grid element, vertical accents and lighter, more transparent glass. The grid element utilizes a sandblasted pre -cast concrete material with an aggregate finish in a column and beam arrangement that is superimposed over the glass wall. The pre -cast concrete material forms an arcade at the ground level and extends to the fifth floor on the front and rear elevations Projecting bronze "fins" are arranged on each column section of the grid treatment adding a vertical emphasis to the facade. The mechanical equipmen! housed at the top of the building is screened by an angled roof screen that has a light green plaster finish. Parking Garage: The proposed parking garage is located at the northwest comer of the property near the rear of the Aloha Apartments. The structures on the apartment complex nearest the parking structure consist of unused recreation facilities and carports. The siting of the garage in this location minimizes privacy and noise impacts to the residential use. The proposed garage provides 730 parking spaces over four levels at a height of 33 feet. There are currently 730 surface parking spaces on the office portion of the property. The parking garage will add 448 net parking spaces. The design of the concrete structure consists of segmented low wall panels between a series of columns with openings between each floor level. A solid sheer wall is visible on a portion of the north and south elevations. The stair tower with a light green standing seam metal roof is featured on the south elevation. Vertical wire trellises punctuate the facade and will serve as a mechanism for climbing vines to adhere to the building. Staff Report -- Planning Commission Meeting of November 11, 1997 SDP 97-01/S 97-201UP 97-11 -- 1999 S. Bascom Avenue - Pmneyard Place Pace 4 Hotel Expans_m: The hotel is located at the northern side of the shopping center facing the Aloha Apartments. The hotel expansion will be accomplished by demolishing and reconfiguring 19,830 square feet of existing retail space for conversion to the hotel rooms, arJ adding approximately 5,000 square feet of new construction behind the Rock Bottom Brewery. The design of the addition will continue in a three story format, and is consistent with the design and building materials of the existing hotel. The interior ground level courtyard is also proposed for refurbishment. Si na e: A sign application for new signage has not been filed in conjunction with the proposed development. Therefore, no new signage is approved with the proposed project. On -site Circulation: At the direction of the City Traffic Engineer, on -site circulation was reviewed conjunction with the traffic report prepared for this project. The followirg modifications to the site layout are recommended to improve on -site circulation: • Conversion of the one-way driveway (in only) on the east side of the Outback Steakhouse to a two- way driveway. • Removal of the last two parking spaces at the end of each parking aisles directly behind the Outback Steakhouse (eight total) to provide room for truck deliveries without blocking the drive aisles. • Directional striping starting at the west side of Tower 11 to the most westerly drive aisle that continues to the parking garage. • Removal of the eight parking spaces near the signalized driveway on Bascom Avenue (parking area in front of and east of Left at Albuquerque) to prevent vehicles from backing into the driveway at the northei n entrance. Attachment number 3 illustrates these on -site circulation improvements. A condition of approval requires the implementation of these improvements in conjunction of the proposed projects. Landscape and Pedestrian Amenities: The conceptual landscape plan provided in the exhibits indicate the following landscape and pedestrian improvements: Landscaping • A 10-foot wide, planter area in front of the east elevation of the parking garage. • Tree wells in the double loaded parking aisle east of the parking garage. • Climbing vines on all elevations of the parking garage. • Tree surrounding the n ,a office tower and additional trees in the 'court" area of the offices. • Trellises, and climbing vines covering the courtyard areas adjacent to the office new building. • Heavy tree planting along the western property line up to the parking garage. • New evergreen hedge row along the northern property line. • The addition of trees, ground cover and shrubs in the parking aisles in front of the new office building. • Tree planting in :he adjacent Highway 17 right-of-way. Staff Report -- Planning Commission Meeting of November 11, 1997 SDP 97-01/S 97-20/UP 97-1 I -- 1999 S. Bascom Avenue — Pruneyard Place Page 5 Pedestrian Details • The use of decorative paving materials to create a pedestrian path between the parking garage and the office buildings, and to link the buildings together. • Decorative lighting fixtures Flanking the pedestrian paths within the office complex. • Continuation of the arcade treatment on the new office tower. • The use of decorative paving materials to link the office buildings and the parking garage. • Provision of courtyard areas adjacent to the new office building. Transportation Facilities: The Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) has submitted recommendations regarding transportation facilities. The City Traffic Engineer is currently reviewing the recommendations. Staff will respond to this matter verbally at the meeting. The letter from the VTA is attached. Parking: The use of shared parking concept was approved with the original development of the site, and with the remodel of the shopping center in 1995. The development under consideration proposes to continue a shared parking arrangement. The traffic study for this project indicates that the proposed parking facilities will meet future parking demands for all the uses at the Pruneyard. The parking analysis detailed in the Project Data attachment demonstrates that the proposed parking ratio is consistent with the parking ratios approved with the remodel of the shopping center in 1995. Moreover, overall parking will be enhanced by the availability of the parking garage to the shopping center patrons during the evening hours, when the demand by the office use is low. Traffic: The Traffic Report prepared for this project estimates the proposed office development will generate 1,711 daily trips with 234 trips occurring in the AM peak -hour and 225 trips occurring in the PM peak -hour. Although the traffic from the hotel was analyzed under the previous environmental assessment prepared with the shopping center remodel, the hotel expansion was never constructed. Therefore, the trips generated by this use are not affecting the existing intersections in the vicinity of the Pruneyard. The estimates of the previous traffic report indicated that 416 daily trips would be generated by the hotel expansion. The total daily traffic generated by the entire project is 2,127 vehicle trips. Table 3 (Project Level of Service) on page Page 34 of the Expanded Initial Study summarizes the traffic analysis for 10 critical intersections under three scenarios: Existing Conditions Background Conditions (Existing conditions + Hotel) Background plus Project (Existing conditions + Hotel + New Office) The analysis indicates that while only one intersection (Bascom Avenue and the Pruneyard) would experience a decrease the current Level of Service (from "C" to "D") with the development of the entire project (hotel + new office), the proposed projects will increase intersection delays below current levels at all 10 intersections. l Staff Report --Planning Commission Meeting of "!ovember 11, 1997 SDP 97-01/S 97-20/UP 97-1 1 -- 1999 S. Bascom Ave- The Pruneyard Paee 6 CAMPISI EXTENSION The area bounded by Bascom Avenue, Highway 17, Hamilton Avenue, and Campbell Avenue is a major commercial district within the City. Development in this area include the Prometheus development, numerous office developments, and the Pruneyard. Recognizing the need to provide improved access to this area, the Circulation Element of the General Plan identified policies, objectives and implementation procedures to improve the City's traffic circulation including the development of new streets. The Circulation Element identifies the extension of Campisi Way property as a north/south connection to the Pruneyard. The purpose of the Campisi Extension is to provide direct access to the Pruneyard by ay 17 and Hamilton Avenue west of Highway 17 to bypass Bascom Avenue. allowing traffic from Highw r indicate that the extension of Campisi Way would result Estimates provided by the City Traffic Enginee in the following: • Eliminates 252 northbound left turns at the Hamllton/BaSCOm intersection during the PM peak hour. • Reduces the PM peak hour delays at the Hamilton/Bascom intersection eight seconds below existing conditions. • Approximately 5,860 vehicles per day generated by the Pruneyard would use the extension. • Traffic utilizing the extension would almost exclusively have an origin or destination at the Pruneyard. • The extension reduces travel time to and from the Pruneyard and both Highway 17 and Hamilton Avenue west of Highway IT • The extension will increase the amount of unused capacity at the Hamilton/Bascom intersection. • The extension has a positive impact on congestion in the vicinity of the Pruneyard. • The extension of Campisi Way would off -set the impacts of traffic between the Pruneyard and both Highway 17 and locations on Hamilton Avenue west of Highway 17. The Campisi Extension directly benefits the Pruneyard by providing a direct mcc,.rs of access to the be Pruneyard from Highway 17 and Hamilton Avenue. Therefore, staff recommends that the developer e required to contribute a pr,)portional shore of the costs of the extension, with the amount determind tied prior to the City Council decision. Construction costs include design/engineering, land acquisition, severance costs, construction, and demolition of structures at the Aloha Apartments necessary to accommodate the roadway. The conditions are worded to require the Pruncyard to participate in the to resolve the details prior to the Council review of the costs c` extending Campisi. Staff hopes application. Subsequent developmentin the Hamilton and Bascom commercial district would also be required to share in the costs of the constructing the Campisi Way extension if the projects generate traffic that s would pass through Hamilton/BaSCOm intersection. Lg RATOS CREEK TRAIL ACCESS Access to the Los Gatos Creek Trail is located at the northwest comer of the Pruneyard property. The proposed location of the garage will necessitate relocation of the access. The current site plan indicates the relocation of the access along the west side of the garage that ranges in width from 10-15 feet. The location of the garage will obstruct views of the Creek trail access. Due to concerns regarding the Staff Report -- Planning Commission Meeting of November 11, 1997 SDP 97-01/S 97-20/UP 97-11 -- 1999 S. Bascom Avenue -- The Pruneyard Page 7 location and safety of the access in this area, staff has included a condition of approval requiring the applicant to work with the City Engineer to investigate alternatives for relocating of the access. In the event that an alternate location is not found or an alternative location includes area of limited visibility, the applicant would be required to install closed circuit security cameras to monitor activity along the Creek Trail connection. SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE This application was reviewed by the Site and Architectural Review Committee on October 30, 1997. The Committee was generally supportive of the overall development proposal. However. the Committee expressed concern regarding various architectural features. The Committee found that the proposed beige/sandstone paint color indicated for the parking garage was not suitable given its visibility from the freeway, and because the color did not match the office buildings. The Committee was also not supportive of the light green color indicated for the roof of elevator tower, and on the roof screen of the new office tower. The Committee was divided on the architectural element proposed for the facade of the new office building. At issue was the use of the pre -cast concrete grid treatment that is superimposed on the glass wall on the front and rear elevations. The City's Architectural Advisor expressed the following concerns regarding the precast concrete material: • The material is not consistent with any other building =,erial or paving treatment within the Pruneyard. • The material is not architecturally compatible with the existing office towers or the shopping center. • The material is more commonly used on industrial developments. • The proposed material is not suitable for a professional office development that is located and surrounded by commercial land uses. Attachments: I. Findings 2. Conditions of Approval 3. Expanded Initial Study, Mitigated Negative Declaration, and Clarifications to Initial Study 4. Project Data Sheet 5. Letter from VTA 6. Location Map 7. Exhibits Submitted by: Glori�Sciaraa, erIT-) Approved by: ve Piasecki, Community Development Director Attachment #1 New Language Appears in Italics/Deleted Language is Stricken. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF FILE NO. SDP 97-01/S 97-20/UP 97-11 SITE ADDRESS: 1999 S. BASCOM AVENUE APPLICANT: DAVID R. WORD, WILLIAM WILSON & ASSOCIATES P.C. MEETING: NOVEMBER 11, 1997 The Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to file SDP 97-01/S 97-20/UP 97-11: 1. A Special Development Permit and Site and Architectural Permit propose the construction of one 130,000 gross square foot, six -story office building, and a four level parking garage containing 730 parking spaces on the westem side of the project site. 2. The Conditional Use Permit application proposes a 54 room expansion to the Pruneyard Inn. 3. The proposed development applications, as conditioned, are consistent with the General Plan and Zoning designations which indicate a Commercial land uses for this property. 4. The proposed landscape plan and site amenities will improve the appearance of the proposed project. 5. The proposed parking and circulation modifications, with the recommended conditions of approval, improves the general on -site circulation of the site. 6. Under the direction of the City of Campbell, an Expanded Initial Study was prepared by David J. Powers and Associates, Inc., for the project in compliance with the Califomia Environmental Quality Act. 7. No substantial evidence has been presented which shows that the project, subject to implementation of mitigation measures identified in the Expanded Initial Study, will have a significant adverse environmental impact. 8. The traffic study prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan demonstrates that the proposed parking shared parking concept is sufficient to support the proposed development and the existing uses on the property. 9. The traffic study prepared by Linscon, Law & Greenspan indicates that the proposed office development will generate 1,711 vehicle trips per day during weekdays. 10. The existing development on the property consists of movie theaters, retail, office, and hotel uses. The proposed development is consistent with the existing uses on the property with adjacent land uses, subject to the conditions of approval. 11. The Circulation Element of the Campbell General Plan identifies the extension of Campisi Way as an improvement the City's circul -tion system. NEW LANGUAGE IN ITALICS/DELETED LANGUAGE IS STRICKEN FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF FILE NO. SDP 97-Ol/S 97-20lUP 97-11 Page 2 irect access o the neyard by allowing 1 Z traffic m Highway Campisise of the and Hamiltonxnis to Aven Avovide enue t of Highway 17 to o bypass Bascom Avenue. 13. The Campisi Extension is identifier' in the Circulation Element as a necessary circulation improvement to the Hamilton and Bascom commercial district area. 14. City traffic engineering estimates conclude that the extension of Campisi Way will result in the following: • Eliminates 252 northbound left turns at the Hamilton/Bascom intersection during the PM peak hour. • Reduces the PM peak hour delays at the Hamilton/Bascom intersection eight seconds below existing conditions. generated by the Prnnve an origin or destination at the would use the extension. • Approximately 5,860 vehicles per day • Traffic utilizing the extension would almost exclusively have an Pruneyard. • Reduces travel time to and from the Pruneyard and both Highway 17 and Hamilton Avenue west of Highway 17. • Increases the amount of unused capacity at the Hamilton/Bascom intersection. • Has a positive impact on congestion in the vicinity of the Pruneyard. • Would off -set tLe project's traffic impacts that travel between the Pruneyard and both Highway 17 and locations on Hamilt ,n Avenue west of Highway 17. 15. The extension of Campisi Way to the Pruneyard property directly benefits the Pruneyard. 16. The developer will be required to contribute a proportional share of the costs of construction to extend Campisi Way. There is a reasonal relationship between the amount of the contribution and the cost of the Campisi Way extension in that the project site would be the primary beneficiary of the extension. ion to extend Campisi Way design/engineering, land acquisition, 17 1 tie costs of severance costs, construction, t on, and demolition of structures at the Aloha Aparhnents necessary to accommodate the roadway. 18 • The contribution of a proportional share of the costs to construct the extension of Campisi Way to the Pruneyard property is roughly proportional and reasonably related to the projects impacts. • There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the contribution and the type o development project being proposed in that the extension of Campisi Ray would off set the traffic impacts identified for this type of project. • There is a reasonable relationship between the need for the Campisi Way extension and the type of development being proposed in that the project will generate 1,711 vehicle trips per day during weekdays which would impact already congested City streets and Campisi Wav would mitigate this impact. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF FILE NO. SDP 97-Ol/S 97-20/UP 97-11 Page 3 19. Subsequent developments in the Hamilton and Bascom commercial district will be required to share in the costs of constructing the Campisi Way extension if the projects generate traffic that would pass through Hamilton/Bascom intersection. 20. The proposed use of the pre -cast concrete material on the facade of the new office tower has not been demonstrated to be consistent or architecturally compatible with the other building materials or paving treatments or buildings within the Pruneyard. 21. The proposed light green paint color on the roof on the elevator tower of the parking garage and on the roof screen of the new office tower is not compatible with the building colors of the proposed office tower. 22. The conditions of approval require details and revisions to the proposed building materials and paint colors so that they are architecturally compatible with the existing and proposed development. 23 The proposed parking garage is highly visible from Highway 17. 24. The proximity of the garage to the western property line does not allow the installation of sufficient landscaping to adequately screen the parking garage from Highway 17. 25. Existing off -site landscaping within the Caltrans right-of-way adjacent to the western property line is not sufficient to screen the proposed parking garage or the property from Highway 17. 26. The conditions of approval require supplemental off -site landscaping of 24" box Redwood trees in the adjacent Caltrans right-of-way to adequately screen the parking garage from Highway 17. 27. The proposed location of the parking garage necessitate the relocation of access to the Los Gatos Creek Trail access from the Pruneyard. 28. The proposed relocation of the Los Gatos Creek Trail access indicated on the site plans on the west side of the parking garage blocks visibility of the access and may compromise safety of pedestrians using the facility. 29. A condition of approval requires the applicant to investigate alternative locations that provide more safety to users of the access or to install security cameras to monitor activity along the Creek Trail in the event that an alternative location is not found. Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further finds and concludes that: I. The proposed project, with conditions of approval, is consistent with the policies of the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance in effect at the time of the application submittal and is consistent with uses in the immediate area. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF FILE NO. SDP 97-01/S 97-20/UP 97-11 Pate 2. The proposed project will aid in the enhancement and the harmonious development of the immediate area. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the use will Dot be detrimental to the public health, safety, peace, morals, comfort or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use. 3. The proposed use will not be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the general welfare of the City and its residents. 4. The proposed project with the conditions imposed, will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been prepared for the project. 5. The proposed site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use and site improvements. 6. These conditions are required as related and proportional to the impacts of the project. o Attachment #2 New Language Appears in Italics/Deleted Language is Stricken. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR FILE NO. SDP 97-Ol/S 97-20/UP 97-11 SiTE ADDRESS: 1975 and 1"9 S BASCOM AVENUE APPLICANT: DAVID R. WORD, WILLIAM WILSON & AS P.C. MEETING: NOVEMBER 11,1"7 The applicant is hereby notified. as part of this application, that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California. The lead department with which at the applicant will work is identified on each condition. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this development and are not herein specified. I p,,,;H v_ ppprov*I is granted for a Special Development Permit (SDP 97-01) and Site and Architectural Review Permit (S 97-20) allowing development on property located at 1999 S. Bascom Avenue consisting of the following: • A six story, 130,000 gross square foot office building and; • A four level parking garage containing 730 parking spaces; Project approval shall substantially comply with project plans prepared by Homberger and Wortell, Inc. stamp dated 10/30/97, except as modified by the Conditions of Approval contained herein. 2.y*n;'rt Arse_roVa1: Approval is granted for a Use Permit (UP 97-11) allowing development on property located at 1875 S. Bascom Avenue consisting of the following: • A 54 room hotel addition; Project approval shall substantially comply with project plans prepared by Homberger and Worstell, Inc. stamp dated 10/30/97, except as modified by the Conditions of Approval contained herein. 3. 90 Office�ElsYitls?nt A. M"mAh . Applicant shall continue to work with staff on resolving the exterior treatment of building facade (substitution of the pre cast concrete material) and the design of the roof screen (eliminate angled design) or integrate similar roof screens on the two existing office buildings to provide consistency with the architectural design of the existingnd _ development. The Exterior facade details shall be referred to the to or to ssuance of Review Committee and Pluming Commission for review and approval Prior building permits for the office structure. I: arid olon: Applicant shall work with start to select appropriate building B. - Sa C e the roof of tower, and the roof screen on the office building, and colon for the parking garb bli with the alternative material for the elevator tower roof is ref materials and colors f the Pang existing developments on the subject property. Review Committee and Planning gunge dull or referred to the Site for to issuance Architectural building permits. Commission for review and approvalprior CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR FILE NO. SDP 97-01/S 97-20ATP 97-11 Page 2 4, Anoroved Materialc/T..e - Applicant shall submit final sample materials indicating Pedestrian level details, hardscape, mesh screening for the actual finishes and colors that will be utilized on all new buil Parking VMC- � samples of areas for review and approval b gs, walkways, and courtyard PlanningCo Y the Site and Architectural Review Committee and Commission. 5' it �'� rail Applicant shall submit a site plan and illustrated broch the location and design of architectural features such as outdoorure indicating re, bicycle parking facilities, and non -fixed landscape planters that will utilized fitmituin the new building areas for approval by the Community Development Director. 6. Pinal Site Pl 11 - Applicant shall submit a final site plan indicating circulation and modifications for review and subject to approval by the CommunityParking and the Public Works Director for substantial compliDevelopment Director issuance of building permits. ance with approved plans prior to 7. Development_ dMdile - Construction of the office tower parkin expansion shall commence within one year from the date of project approval and shall be jg garage and hotel completed within one year following the commencement of construction. 8. Patkil>eaud Drivewav - All perking and driveway with the approval and plzns and Chapter 21.50 areas shall be developed in compliance Municipal Code subject to review by the Community Development[ Loading) Director. the Campbell 9. On_sire t ishNno lighting shall be shielded —��....�.. On -site li tin eaway from ad'acrnt directed on site. Details of project lighting shall be approved b 1 properties and prior to the issuance of building permits. Y the Planning Department 10. P18a: Applicant shall submit four (4) sets of the final landscaping indicating the type and size Ofplant material includingon -site Plan irrigation system to the CommunityDevel �• Planting details and the issuance of building opment Director for review and approval prior to removal or relocation due Permits. The rculation imshall include e number oftrees Proposed for removal or relocation shall be identified by size, improvements. Any trees subject to type, number and species. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR FILE NO. SDP 97-Ol/S 97-20/UP 97-11 11, Tree Protection: A tree protection plan prepared by a licensed arborist shall be submitted to the Planning Division providing tree protection measures during all phases of demolition, resurfacing, or construction. An trees damaged during construction shall he replaced with three trees for every one removed. The size of replacement trees shall be 24 inch box. 12. Off -site Landscaning: The applicant shall submit landscaping plans indicating installation of 24-inch box Redwood trees and irrigation along the Caltrans right-of-way adjacent to the western property line to supplement existing landscaping in order to screen the site from view from Highway 17. The plan shall be submitted to the Campbell Cortumunity Development Director for approval prior to submittal to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The planting of trees shall be spaced consistent with the spacing of trees along the Highway 17 right-of-way northern of Hamilton Avenue. All necessary approvals and permits for landscaping on land located in the Caltrans right-of-way must be obtained at the expense of the applicant from the California Department of Transportation. The submittal of the off -site landscape plans shall be coordinated by the Campbell Community Development Department. The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the trees for the first five years following their installation. 13. SigaaS Elnglam - No signage is approved as part of the development applications appr3ved herein (SDP 97-01, S 97-20, UP 97-11). The applicant shall submit a sign proinm indicating all new signs for the site which are intended for the advertisement of uses vnthin the site. No sign shall be installed until such application is approved and a permit issued by the Community Development Department, Planning Commission or City Council as specified in Section 21.53. of the Zoning Ordinance (Sign Ordinance). 14. Freeway Signs - All new or refaced freeway oriented signs require approval from the City Council. Construction Mitigation Measures: The applicant shall implement mitigation measures as specified in the Expanded Initial Study dated 10/22/97 (pages 39-40) prepared by David J. Powers and Associates, Inc. including the following: Construction activities will be limited to daytime hours of 9:00 am to 5:00 p.m. weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Saturdays. Construction is prohibited on Sundays and Holidays. No pile driving is allowed for construction of the garage. All internal combustion engines for construction equipment used on the site will !e properly muffled and maintained. Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines is strictly prohibited. All stationary noise generating construction equipment, such as air compressors and portable power generator, will be located as far as practical from the existing residences and businesses. Occupants of the Aloha Apartment complex and tenants of the Pruneyard will be notified of the construction schedule in writing, and an on -site contact person and phone number shall be provided in the notice. All active construction areas shall be watered at least twice daily. Cover all trucks hauling soil and other loose materials stationed or prior to leaving the site. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR FILE NO. SDP 97-Ol/S 97-201CP 97-11 Paee 4 9. Pave, apply water, or apply non -toxic soil stabilizers on all unpaved surfaces, and staging areas at the construction site. 10. Sweep daily all paved access roads, parking areas, staging areas, and adjacent public strcets as directed by the City Engineer. 11. Enclose, cover, water or apply soil binders to exposed stockpiles. 12. Limit traffic speeds on unpaved surfaces to 15 mph. 13. Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent runoff to all roadways, waterways or pubic walkways accessed by the public. 14. Replant vegetation in disturbed areas as soon as possible. 15. Establish a program for participation of vehicle trip reduction by construction crews. 16. Provide a monthly status report to the Building Official verifying conditions of the site, progress of construction and the implementation of construction mitigation measures. 16.Parking d irina Construction: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a diagrammatic site plan and narrative description indicating the location(s) and number of parking spaces that will be displaced during construction, the proposed stacking area and the number of cars accommodated on -site in the stacking area, the number and schedule of attendants supervising the temporary parking arrangements, and the location of off -site parking and shuttle for tenants of the Pruneyard. The temporary parking plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director and the Public Works Director prior to issuance of bui!ding permits. 17. Archaeological Mitigation and Monitoring Program, provide an archaeological monitoring program prepared by a qualified archaeologist to monitor all subsurface excavation and construction for review and approval by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. The program shall be consistent with the mitigation measures specified in the Expanded Initial Study dated 10/22/97 (page 41) prepared by David J. Powers and Associates, Inc. 18. Demolition Permit - The applicant is required to obtain a demolition permit, subject to review and approval by the Building Official prior to the demolition of structures or other on -site improvements that will be removed in conjunction with the approved plans. 19. Traffic Circulation A QMWA�al - Applicant shall reserve a "no build" area on the subject property to provide for the future extension of Campisi Way in a form acceptable to the City Attorney and the City Engineer. NEW LANGUAGE IN ITAt,.CS/DELETED LANGUAGE IS STRICKEN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR FILE NO. SDP 97-Ol/S 97-20/UP 97-11 Page S B. Campisi Way Contribution: The Applicant shall contribute a proportional share of the cost to extend Campisi Way to the Pruneyard property consistent with the Circulation Element of the Campbell General Plan. The cost to extend Campisi Way will include design/engineering, land acquisition, severance costs, construction, and demolition of structures at the Aloha Apartments necessary to accommodate the roadway. C. �xpendAWM of WUk: The funds collected for the extension of Campisi Way shall be viseof t�peeiWay deposited, invested and accounted for pursuant to California Government Code Section 66006. If the necessary funds are not appropriated by the City for the construction of the Campisi Way extension within five years, the applicant shall contribute funds to improve traffic circulation in the vicinity of the Pruneyard to offset vehicle trips generated by the new development. The extension of Campisi Way is not required prior to the development or occupancy of the approved projects permitted under SDP 97-01, S 97-20, and UP 97-11. D. On -site Property Modifications: The applicant shall be responsible for the costs of all on -site modifications(e.g. parking, curbs. Oat work, etc.) necessary to accommodate a future terminus of Campisi Way to the Pruneyard property, at the time the extension is constructed. E. RolacPt1tent parking: The applicant shall work with the City to accommodate parking displaced by the Campisi expansion. 20 Applicant shall prepare appropriate plans and/or studies as directed by the City Engineer tc, determine an appropriate location to relocate the existing access to the Los Gatos Creek 'frail from the Pruneyard property. Construction of the connection shall be completed by the applicant prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new office building. In the event that an alternate location is not found or an alternative location includes area of limited visibility, the applicant shall install closed circuit security cameras to monitor activity along the Creek Trail connection shown on the site plans. 21. Public Storm Drainage Fnilities: Applicant shall undertake a study in accordance with generally accepted engineer practice to determine requirements for relocation of public storm drainage facilities, if any, and for relocation of public utilities, if any, as required to meet these conditions of approval. If required, submit storm drainage relocation plans and/or public utility relocation plans. 22. Rcplarement of Pavement Surfaces - The applicant shall work with staff to ascertain the condition of existing paved surfaces throughout the Pruneyard and prepare a site plan identifying failed pavement. Areas showing failure or disrepair shall he replaced or rehabilitated if possible as determined by City staff. Prior to the installation of new pavement or asphalt surfaces, the applicant shall prepare a plan for review and approval by the Land Development Division of the Public Works Department providing section details of the replacement pavement. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR FILE NO. SDP 97-Ol/S 97-20/UP 97-11 Page 6 23. Speed Bumps - Submit plans showing the location and replacement of all on -site speed bumps with City -approved speed undulations (speed bumps). 24. Undergmund Utilities - Install new on -site utilities underground per Section 20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings. Provide evidence from all utility companies that the proposed development modifications can be served. Comply with the plan submittal, permit and fee requirements of the utilities as: ociated with new or modified service connections. 25. Gradine Plans: All grading plans shall meet City standards as deemed appropriate for the proposed development. A grading permit shall be required in conjunction with building permits. 26. Draina¢e Plans: Submit grading and drainage plans with hydrology and hydraulic calculations for existirg on -site drainage improvements and for proposed on -site grading improvements showing proposed pad elevations of new structures, existing and proposed on -site and off -site grading and storm drainage systems and controlled site drainage onto public right-of-way. 27. .r i g(Erosion Control Plans - Submit final grading, grading and erosion control plans to the Community Development and Public Works Departments for approval prior to issuance of building or grading permits. 28. Modified Storm Drainaee Easement - The applicant shall modify the existing 20-foot wide City storm drainage easement that lies parallel and immediately adjacent to the westerly property line of the Pruneyard to re` -ct the allowed encroachment of approximately 175 feet in length of the western building wall of the parking garage. The encroachment into the easement in a westerly direction, shall not exceed four feet six inches. The revised easement description shall be subject to review and erproval by the City Engineer and the City Attorney. 29. Encroachment Permits - Submit application for an encroachment permit(s), pay fees and post surety for any construction within the City's right-of-way 30 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Permit (NPDES) - The applicant is advised that the Regional Water Quality Control Board requires that all construction projects on sites larger than five acres must obtain a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination (NPDES) permit. Permit conditions may require construction and post -construction storm water management plans. The applicant is responsible for obtaining this permit, providing plans and paying associated fees. Copies of the permits shall be provided to the Community Development and Public Works Departments prior to the issuance of building permits. The applicant shall comply with the. California Storm Water Best Management Practices Handbook prepared by the Storm Water Quality Task Force, Santa Clara Valley Water District. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOP FILE NO. SDP 97-01/S 97-201UP 97-11 31. Utilities - All utilities and utility pedestals for new or modified building areas shall be diagrammed on a site utility plan indicating the location of the pedestals and how the equipment will be screened prior to the installation of any utility pedestals (transformers) on site, subject to the review and approval by the Community Development Director. 32. Garbage Collection - Trash containers of a size and quantity necessary to serve new or modified buildi%g areas shall be located in areas approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosures, shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self -closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 33. Mechanical Equipment - All roof -mounted and ground level mechanical equipment, on new or remodeled structures on site, which are visible from the public right of way shall be screened with similar building materials subject to the approval of the Community Development Director. 34. Handicapped Accessibility - All new and remodeled buildings shall provide handicap access in accordance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC), and the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS) and the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). 35. JULC Deliveries and Trash Collection: Trash pick-up and Truck deliveries adjacent to the northern boundary of the site will not be allowed earlier than 6:00 a.m. prior to and following the development approval of SDP 97-Ol/S 97-20/UP 97-11. 36. Transportation Demand Management: Applicant shall participate in a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for future tenants and incorporate participation in such program through the covenants, conditions and restrictions. This program shall incorporate, but is not limited to the following: 1. Provision of Bicycle Parking Fac;lities. 2. Participation in shuttle/car pool service to public transit facilities such as light rail stations or park and ride lots when these facilities are constructed. 3. Accommodation of bus stop locations, if public bus service is provided to the site. 4. Van car pool priority parking spaces. 5. Provision of changing facilities for employees bicycling to work in the new office building. 37. Creek Trail Access and Parking Garage Security: The applicant shall install infrared security cameras on all levels of the parking garage and along the proposed Creek Trail access. The cameras shall be hooked up to a continuos monitoring station. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR FILE NO. SDP 97-01/S 97-20/UP 97-11 Page 8 38. Car Detailing Station: The applicant shall provide a detailed operational statement and plans indicating the location of the car detailing station on the ground floor of the parking garage for review and approval by the Community Development Director and the Public Works Director. The operation of the car detailing station shall comply with all regulations, and practices and obtain all necessary permits to comply with the non -point source pollution controls/management. 39. Graffiti Abatement: The applicant shall record a covenant obligating existing and future property owners to remove or paint over any graffiti within seven days after is application or seven days after notification is provided by the City of the existence of said graffiti. The applicant shall devise a procedure for the expeditious eradication of graffiti. City of Campbell Community Development Department Special Development Permit Application 97-01 Site and Architectural Application 97-20 'Truneyard Place" Mitigated Measures The following table has been developed in accordance with section 15070 of the CEQA Guidelines, and contains the mitigation measures necessary to implement the proposed "Pruneyard Place" development. The table has been constructed to include the list of mitigations and the reference to the appropriate initial study category, the timing of the mitigation, the City of Campbell department responsible for the implementation of the mitigation, the date the mitigation is completed, and the initials of the individual that was responsible for ensuring the completion of the appropi ate mitigation. MITIGATION TAMING DEPARTMENT DATE/ INITIAL 1, Coot tic ion Mi iaa ion Mea_• •Ks: The Prior to, and during all Building Official/ applicant shall implement mingation phases of conswction. Community measures as specified in the Expanded as appropriate. Development Initial Study dated 10122/97 (pages 39-40) Department prepared by David 1. Powers and Associates. Inc. including the following: 1. Construction acuvtnes will be limited to daytime hours of 9:00 am to 5:00 p.m. weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Saturdays. Construction is prohibited on Sundays and Holidays. 2. No pile driving is allowed for construction of the garage. 3. All internal combustion engines for construction equipment used on the site will be properly muffled and maintained. 4. Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines is strictly prohibited. 5. All stationary noise generating construction equipment. such as air compressors and portable power generator. will be located as far as practical from the existing residences and businesses. 6. Occupants of the Aloha Aparunent complex and tenants of the Pruneyard will be notified of the construction schedule in writing, and an on -site contact person and phone number shall be provided in the notice. mitigation Me.,urcs • SDP 97-0I/S 97-20. 1983 d: t999 S. Bascom Avenue - Prune and place 7. All active construction areas shall be watered at least twice daily. B. Cover all trucks cauling soil and "djer loose materials stationed or prior to leaving the site. 9. Pave. apply water. or apply non -toxic soil stabilizers on all unpaved surfaces, and staging areas at the construction site. 10. Sweep daily all paved access roads. panting area, staging areas. and adjacent public streets as directed by the City Engineer. 11. Enclose, cover, water or apply soil binders to exposed stockpiles. 12. Limit traffic speeds on unpaved surfaces to 15 mph. 13. Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent runoff to all roadways, watt. -ways or pubic walkways accessed by the public. 14. Replant vegetation in disturbed areas as soon as possible. 15. Establish a program for participation of vehicle trip reduction by construction crews. 16. Provide a monthly status tepon to the Building Offrcisl verifying conditions of the site, progress of construction and the implementation of construction mitigation measures. hrtpiement the archaeological monitoring pti eg Pre{onstruction Community prior to and dtu- Devel nt Program as specified in the Expended Initial op� Study deed 10/22/97 (page 41) prepared b e fig. subsurface Department a qualified archaeologist to monitor all Y vation. subsurface excavation. If a pommW archavolog- site car umfact is located err uncovered during covtruction, all activity wih be halted until such time the archaeologist has determined dte sip &,.i, of the find, and approPnore measures are to"tpktad for the nnug&;on or removal or PROJECT DATA Site Summary Attachment 4 Gross Lot Area Net Lot Area: Building Cov Landscape Coverw: Paving Coverage: 29.68 acres 27.24 acres I 37% 15% laohw" 48% Ruildina Area Summary Use Egg Proposed Addition or Deletion Retail 255,857 s.f. 236,027 s.f. -19,930 Hotel (4,962 s.f. 84,792 s.f. +4 655 s.f. Parting Garage N/A v 246,556 s.f. +246 56 s.f. OHlce Towers 234,244 s.f. 364.244 s.f. +! 30,000 s.f. TOTAL lILDING EA 555,063 sd. 931,619 ed. +361 1 s f. IVI—r Aran Rat in Cumrnary Existin - _ With Proposed Garay_ Without Proposed GaEM 47 .79 .58 Qh.r.A Parlrinn Analvele E�dWag Proposed Parting Proposed Added�Parting Parting Spaces Parking Spaces04d) L Ratio Deland Ratio 1:320 2.178 spaces 16 1:316 1 2,162 ;49V1u.1191y.Tr -edon Andwby RECEIVED November 4, 1997 NOV 0 6 1997 City of Campbell PINING DEM PBELL 70 North First Street Campbell, CA 95008 Attention: Gloria Sciara, Planner 11 Subject: Pruneyard Place Dear Ms. Sciara: Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) staff have reviewed the project referenced above for the construction of a new 132.000-square foot. 6-story office building and a new 730- space, 4-level parking garage at the existing 27.2-acre mixed -use Pruneyard development. Our comments follow, and are separated into "Transit Service" and "Congestion Manag. ment Program' issues to reflect the dual responsibilities of VTA. Transit Service Bus Service As noted in the Expanded Initial Study for Pruneyard Place (IS), the project site is served by VTA's Bus Line 26 which runs on Campbell Avenue and Line 61 which runs on Bascom Avenue. During peak periods, Line 26 has 20 minute headways and Line 61 has 15 minute headways. VTA maintains three bns stops adiacent to the nroiect site: One southbound stop on Bascom Avenue just north of Campbell Avenue; one westbound stop on Campbell Avenue just west of Bascom Avenue; and one westbound stop on Campbell Avenue opposite North Union Avenue. Combined, over three hundred daily riders board and de -board at these stops. Roughly 95 percent of the activity or 300 daily boardings and de-boardings take place at the two stops new the corner of Bascom Avenue and Campbell Avenue. These two stops should be given priority with the following recommended improvements. 3331 N.rt1 fins Antt • So lost, (A 95134 1906 • Aimitisimioo 401 321.5555 - (ostme, Sevin 401.321.2311 City of Campbell Page 2 November 4, 1997 VTA staff recommend that the City condition the developer to provide the following transit improvements as part of the project: • At each of the three stops, a minimum 22-foot curb lane or bus duckout consistent with the attached VTA Typical Bus Duckout, Figure 22. • At each of the three stops, a PCC bus stop pavement pad consistent with the attached VTA Bus Stop Pavement Details, Figure 26 and Technical Specifications. • A minimum 8-foot wide sidewalk adjacent to each bus stop in compliance with the bus stop pedestrian access standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). • Wheelchair curb ramps in compliance with ADA standards at the intersection of Bascom and Campbell Avenues and at all project driveways. • Provide and maintain shelters at each of the three stops as the City of Campbell does not participate in VTA's bus shelter program. Shelters should be placed behind the sidewalks. VTA staff also request that the developer submit the bus stop improvement plans to VTA for review and approval prior to construction. For further assistance in the development of the bus stop improvements, please contact Mr. Kiyo Ushino, Passenger Facilities Program Manager, at (408) 321-5828. Transportation/Circulation In the 1S, future traffic generation is assumed with and without the Vasona Light Rail Project (Vasona Project) and Transportation Demand Measures (TDM). This proposed development is located less than a half mile from the future Campbell Light Rail Station. With the Vasona Project and TDM, a seven percent reduction in commuter vehicle trips is assumed. However, there is no explanation of how the proposed project is going to facilitate the use of alternative modes of transportation to achieve that reduction. To justify the seven percent reduction in trips and the conclusion that there is no significant traffic impact as a result of this project, VTA staff recommend that the City condition the developer to include the following specific measures as part of the project: • Direct pedestrian connections or access routes to transit and to existing retail establishments which are currently separated from the project by parking. Pedestrian connections to transit can be accomplished by using pavement treatments through the parking lot that identify the most direct connection to the bus stops on Campbell and Bascom Avenues. Stich a link to Campbell Avenue will also provide the most direct route to the Campbell Light Rail Station via Campbell Avenue. City of Campbell Page 3 November 4, 1997 • Shuttle service to the future Campbell and/or Hamilton Light Rail Stations. • Incentives to use transit such as employer-subsidiud discounts on transit passes. • Showers and secure bike parking to take advantage of the project's proximity to the Los Gatos Creek Trail. • Preferential carpool parking. Congestion Management Program (CMP) • The intersections included in the IS and which are Congestion Management Program intersections should be identified as CMP intersections. • Table 4 of'he Traf/?c Impact Study does not note the level of service for the intersection of Bascom and Hamilton Avenues. Rased on the delay shown in the table, the level of servic: is - .. we appreciate the opportunity to review this project. If you have any questions, please call Lauren Bobadilla of my staff at (408) 321-5776. Sirtggely, A ) /Iwi�- Rountree Environmental Program Manager TDR:LGB:kh Attachments cc: Peter B. Eakland, T.E., City of Campbell LESS THAN 20 MPH APPROACH SPEED WSIaE DIRECTION CORE ARCS. LOCAL STRRTS RIDSITnO FOC (Tyr) �/zzmzs szS:s>css>aassnss lo• NEW (TFOC ") 50' MIN DO' YIN T 10 MPH YQf.SII PCC PATSMENT WITH MONOLITHIC LURK. TO FI FOR DETAIL! RSFQ CORE to. 20 TO SO MPH APPROACH SPEED WSOLTi DIRECTION MAJOR ARTERIALS TSS�.SSSSSS � A SSStsfifiSSRS DO' MIN T DO' YIN 100' DTSIREABLE 100' YlSINSASLE SO TO 40 MPH APPROACH SPEED WpoaE DIRECTION _ EXPRESSWAYS 10' ITtl' MIN T an, ION 100' D=—ASi: FOR t0 WR IIOOQ PLAN VIEW T (TANGWT lENOTR) : M' RSOVIRED Pot 010! 01M STOP. . N' . 7W (X-1)• WNOQ X . I OP MIDO ' (m AT HAM 7241two TSRNWYL) SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUIHORMY TYPICAL BUS DUCKOUT FIGURE 22 B10C•AUf F.G.C.A F A le'f My m SANK AMD 01CWIM CWnK rA•EWDIT. .BII131 PAD M 75• OR IOMGO. r1AC9 IVAMAW1 DOOR OICIAWMG CURB . GI/TTCR. TO)IACS WITH AT 1/2 TM IMMM w TIIL I.C.C. ►Aa a LOW PAW F.C.C.►A•EMVI QCTIOM AND MOMOUIRIC MmlDIIITS BIIALL R MGDRA c1IM a clnTa. PLAN VIEW TA-CDAroarON IITTCIA'AU OR AS w49►RSIIARB nAT TlaA/►CKIMCCT0.TR. I—r-1— u• - 1r •Ana --{---««» I M.TCR mfTIMG tUU f GVAS " VW ILAM CGRM YTT tTANRte'BSOLVAIX . • R I�xTrMorTwlc mrrMK 1•R � "' nAm1oR r CLUB R "G. w.a .11. e• e.t. •«B M •n tn�X ilrAe o____--_'___------. NR MCATM CON ACTIBM w IIATM NIL SECTION A —A CONCRETE PAD •/MONOUTNIC CURE k OIYMR r 11/!' R1eS iz LIMTMALTIOM fe BMCS"Ir INK Swam ��• � ALB "I a Ir 0, IIIBIMCA7S m", sAtalo aB1.eBM Oe1TYL B; r •1B[ nBBR rA@—W TO 1/7 sm BNN or Dom N yM TO am lt"t Lm MOM SORB R'am Bu m, rpa MCYIMKJI wAB11aM J C SAM • Ir Bs. wMBenR NIO ccr40 BTWMS OOOIWIMB: St BUM M BeRdS BSTII OKB w BeR6 MBB1.v eLTAIs w 1/•' a �e90-M A e S r r a I.GG .:�. ►A:.0 :�. - - 1•I M "a.BAM -V �' YR M WNW Bens sumrTB eeBK BllrreOlt SECTION B—B SECTION C—C EXPANSION JOINT CONTRACTION JOINT Se70 N :>aCAL erWW AT/MOl MOOI TO ARACUMT A. SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BUS STOP PAVEMENT DETAILS FIGURE 26 CENT EN RAISER v A", + llll IZ/4, I fill I LE LOCATION MAP SDP 97-01/S 97-20/VP 97-11 1875 S. Bascom Avenueand 1999 S. Bascom Avenue also Wednesday, November 05, 199-1 ,HO"BERGER+WORSTELL Page 1 of 1 To Cihxia Sciara Ihe new office tower provides the third side to a court ercatcd b} it and the two exislinz towers. To fulfill its role in this composition the new office told- set, cs ati the Ifni: between the two existing towers. and pnnides the f cus for the court. I'he two ends of the new lower npcat the glans curtainwall exterior of the two adjacent towm, matching its coloration, while the center is differentiated bN a maxt,tr.% grid vertical accents and lighter more transparent glaaa. Vie center facade is organized in vertical tiers Gomt heavy at the hase to light at the top.:V the babe the masonry grid forms an arcade along the ground Icvcl. Dien it o%crlaps the glass before slopping at the fifth floor. Hro a tubes moumed on each vertical of :he mason grid extend from the second floor to the root; providing a t crtical emphasis that is unique to the center facade. October 31, 1997 CITY ter CAMPBELL Community Devc1opment Department Current Planning NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Campbell has set the time of 7:30 p.m., or shortly thereafter, on Tuesday, November 11, 1997, in the City Hall Council Chambers. 70 North First Street, Campbell, California, for a Public Hearing to consider the application of Mr. David Word, on behalf of William Wilson and Associates, for approval of a Special Development Permit (SDP 97-01) and Site and Architectural Approval (S 97-20) to allow the construction of a six- story, 130,000 square foot, office building and a four -level parking garage on property located at 19" S. Bascom Avenue in a C-2-0 (General Commercial/Overlay) Zoning District and approval of a Conditional Use Permit (UP 97-1 1) to allow a 54-room hotel expansion on property located at 1875 S. Bascom Avenue in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project. Interested persons may appear and be heard at this hearing. Please be advised that if you challenge the nature of the above project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing described in this Notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Campbell Planning Commission at, or prior to, the Public Hearing. Questions may be addressed to the Community Development Department at (408) 866-2140. Decisions of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council. Appeals must be submitted to the City Clerk in writing wit5in 10 calendar days of an action by the Commission. In compliance with the Americans v irh Disabilities Act, listening assuive devices are available for all meetings held in the Council Chambers. If you require accommodation, please contact the Community Development Department at (408) 866-2!40, at least one week in advance of the meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL STEVE PIASECKI SECRETARY PLEASE NOTE: When calling about this Notice, please refer to File No. SDP 97-01/S 97-20/UP 97-11 Address: 1875 & 1999 S. Bascom Avenue 7o North Fl— Street CampSell, California 95008 1414 It[ 408 666.7140 1. 408 866 8381 nw 406.666. 3790 43•• `b T H E I' R U N L Y A R [) o. WIIIIAIII %%II IuN h ASNUc IAII� October 30,1997 Ms. Gloria Sciara Community Development City of Campbell 70 N. First St. Campbell, CA 95008 Re: Attendant - assist and shuttle Bus Program - The PruneYard Estimated Program time is eight (8) months. Dear Gloria Ampco Systems Parking has provided the PruneYard ownership with a proposal to conduct attendant assisted parking as well as a shuttle bus service during the construction of the new PruneYard Place Tower, garage and the expansion of the Inn. We estimated that the Garage will be completed after 8 months and opened to our tenants and visitors of the PmneYard. Ampco recommends using attendant - assist program in Lot 8 (between the existing office towers) and Lot 9 on the northwest comer of the property, if demand warrants. Ampco has estimated a shortfall of 100 spaces, therefore, Compuware Corporation will be required to select 100 of their employees to participate in the shuttle service. The actual parking and shuttling location for this tenant is still under review. Attendant - Assist Service Hours of Operation The attendant - assist service would be available to all office tenants during regular business hours, from 7:00 a.m. - 6:00 p.m. Monday - Friday. The service would be provided by two fully - uniformed parking attendants. Once the lot has filled completely with employees who have parked and locked their own vehicles, the attendants would issue claim checks to the patrols in exchange for their keys and would lock them in a nearby key box. The attendants move can as necessary to let blocked vehicles exit. Towards the end of the day, as regular parking spaces become available, the attendants will move aisle cars into these spaces, to make exiting easier for all patrons. Any keys held after posted closing time would be turned over to project security. Optional Extended Service Hours: It may be determined that on Thursday, Friday, and/or Saturday, the hours of attendant - assist service be extended to a 10:00 p.m. hour or later. This will be determined once we have our systems in place. Inav .1.ndh Bn•rn A;rnu� Suitr'ai Cnmptrl' l': t a 0 w �x Trlrtdumr iiii, 1-I Poaimdr Nua -I Ixil Shuttle Service Hours of Operation The shuttle service will begin operating at 6.00 a.m. and run until 6:OC ; .m. Monday - Friday. The service will run every ten minutes during peak hours (7:00 a.m. - 9:09 a.m.; I E00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m.; 3:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.) and every 15 minutes during a!I other operating hours. Construction Crews: During the construction of the tower, garage, and Inn expansion, we will require :hat all construction crews drop their equipment on site and park off site. The shuttle service wall be available to these individuals, location of this parking site is still under review. Ampco Systems Parking was chosen to provide this service to our tenants because they have a long-term track record with our company, William Wilson & Associates. They presently are running a similar job for Speiker Partners at the Airport area. Spieker is building a 120.000 foot building and Ampco is providing shuttle and attendant assist for them. They arc also under contract with us at our Peninsula Office Park Project as we construct a new garage and building. We look forward to implementing this program sometime in January of 1998. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Sincerely, PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES, LLC By William Wilson & Associates It's Managing Agent Jeanne Shook- Arterberry, CPM J Leming Director JSA/jl 1nN''V NODsVU Hlnos f tir 7 4. — -FIGURE ;..;. AVM33M1 LL 31noll _ Inesday. October 29. 1997 ^HQ$NBERGER+WORSTELL 0-ii Page 1 of 1 HORNBF.RC,ER+ WORSTELI, TO: City of ('arnpbell - Gloria Soars FROM: Ron Mcl ester DATE: 10 29 97 RE: Prurce and Place Inn VIA: fax w: %lark Ilombcrger H%%I Jeanne Sh"-Artcrbam David Word DW A file 96274.5.4.5 COMMENTS: Gloria, This metro is to confirm our telephone wnverution in which 5ou stated that the Garsge may continue to encroach 4 ft. 6 in (four feet six irwlros) maximum. into the polxMwd 20 ft wide eascrix" along llighw•ay 17 as has been shown on IfW'1's drawings. This axmtuimed will be limited to the triangular wnfigunlion curmyiy shown stretching 175 0 along the 316 ft. long weal side of the (Mragc beginning mean the southeast caner. The encroachment will extend along 55`s of the length of the Carage and 1409 of the length of the easement. Movable equipment such as the trash axnpactm and receptacles will retrain in the easement. Fixed eWiptmt existing or proposed to be located within the easement, a" as the emergency generator, will be relocated. An interim drainage pipe discharging uto the oreek will be located in the easement until the cllvert is iiwWled at which time project drainage pipe will be connected directly into the culvert. A!! engineering and processing wets incurred in rc-recording the easnmm will be paid by the Owner. [ornbmW+Woratell V�O -.T F1uia�� MdiYui ud PlryO � ,�N�/�A �e CWfmY 94105 ^'�Z G 415906&W FAX October u, 1997 Ms. Gimia Sciara MY OF C"PBFJ.L COMMUNflY DEVELOPMENT 70 North First Saw Campbell, Cdikmia 95" Re: Precast Concrete Exampkx Pruneyard Of5ce Building Caaghell, Californis Dar Gloria: Narabager + Worstell has identified five buildings in your area that have chosen precast oaactass as a finish material Although precast concrete is a widely used material, we have chosen do HOW buildings because they use colored precast caocreee, m we ate proposing to do. The buildings we suggest you visit to understand the finish qualities of precast CnacP1C are: The Fairmont Hotel Ellis at MiddlefkW 170 South Market Street SW Middlefield Road - Building A A. San Jose, California 401 Ellis Street - Buikliag B Mountain View, California Alum 99 Caviglia Drive The Gap Sam Jose, California 900 Cherry Avenue Sam Bruno, California Macrorosdia 101 Redwood Shores Parkway Redrwiod City, California Very truly yours. HORNBBRGER + WORsrEI.L. NC. 'Ac - Rawdd B. ►kLMer Prat et Director REM/adi a: DmW Wasd/WWA Jsara Arwbwry/WWA OWN ktbdornm 9W4.1.4.7/CF Or -CA"w�� A. N r CITY OF CAMPBELL Community Development Department - Current Planning October 23, 1997 Re: SDP 97-0l/S 97-20/UP 97-11 —1999 S. Bascom Avenue — Pnmeyard Dar Applicant: Plwe be advised that the above- referenced application has been scheduled for the following C:+. yty amhit'rtt.r�l Review Co mnilla MeeNnv Date: Thursday, October 30, 1997 Time: 5:30 p.m. Location: Doebch Conference Room, City Hall, 70 N. First Street, Campbell ptaruling Carlift Date: Awsiday, November 11, 1997 Time: 7:30 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 70 N. First Street, Campbell Should you have any questions or comments, please do not besitate to contact me at (408) 86& 2140. Sincerely, je-� Glong Sc. Piamer 11 a: e)avid Wad a Jame Shodo-Artnbaery (AWhcaoW?mpwty 0--) William Wilson ! Associslo 1999 S. Broom Avsssas, Suiss 200 Campbell, CA 95008 Ron Md.saw, AIA 11am1 g A Woeetell. Inc. 170 Msidso Loa SM Praoiro, CA 94109 w tam& taan MwM • CW#6 , Calaaat aMr. N!e • Is, 4a."L3M9 • w saa.rL"N • rat 4$US tM • (MMU (ff4MVdV erim Qlmrrt Offioe of Ww Comfy Clerk 191 North FIM S1rca San )os[. CAWoRII! 981 13 (401%290.2968 *ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION E OF LEAD AGENCY City of Campbell Planning Department NAME OF APPLICANT. David Word. William Wilson a Associates OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT`. ( x) NOTICE OF PREPARATION —NO FEE— ( ) NOTICE OF EXEMPITON/SEMMMENT OF EXEMPTION —NO FEE— B061"VKslilA Kii-I41al1! w 1 FILING NO. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION ( ) A —NEGATIVE DECLARATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 21080(C) OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE $1,250.00 01welve Hundred Fifty Jollars)—STATE FILING FEE W.00 ([Wenty-five Dollars) —CLERK FEE ( ) B—CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION DE MINIMLz, _ - FINDING —NO FEE — NOTICE OF DETERMINATION ( ) A —ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 21152 OF THE PUBLIC RESOURCES CODE S850.00 (Eight Hundred Fifty Dollars) —STATE FILING FEE S25.00 (IMenty-Five Dolisn —CLERIC FEE ( ) B—CERTIFICATE OF EXEMPTION DE MINIMIS IMPACT FINDING —NO FEE — NOON MUST BE COMPLETED AND F MZD WffN ALL ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMEI U WIM TER SAND CLARA COUNTY CLERK'S OMCE. MAKE C=CKS PAYABLE TO: COUNTY CLERK LitW Su dy and CbwMrit TWO of Ptvpa.al: pnmmrd Elect Date Checklist submitted: / As»q Requiring CbOddi : Agency A CityMAWZip: r,WM11 CA MOM Pboae: w •„�-- Agency coetact: � DETERb"ATION Ou da beats of d ds bdW evaloliau: 1)1 find that the proposed project trill not have a sigm fieaut effect on the environment, and A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepued............................................................ b) I fiod that the although the proposed project could have a significant effect on tie envkoaoant. time will not be a significant effect in &is can because dte RdtigatiOn racstues deacdbed on the attached Initial Study have been added to tie project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prcpared•..................................... .......................... c) I lied that dte proposed project may have a significant effect on tie envirorenant. and An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is requited......................................................a ��= - - M, � prim Name Date i EXPANM WITIAL STUDY foiY�D PLACE IO/nm 1999 S. BASCOM AVE. S 97-20/UP 97-11 7 OF 7 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLAN. 08/2000 pro" ; 1L INV 175.94 7. 1 'x, X yv, N 4 X X -iX x SEE 94SERT 'A' 1 %l,Y 44 q N T -AN FIF 1611& 4 0% RIM 18$. 50 INV 176.72' INV 177.23 UU4 \,j RAW" 00 mzp -MSOQ.Z— M Al L7fjV u III 14 . qr-- . A -14 LF 12* RCP ^1.0 —IR 15- THRU 178.16 Inv Ir.-ta aEl II . 53 LF 12* RCP 1-00.005 1 lop TC 187 1 35 RIM 185.68 R D j2 60 .1 INV 10.fll 87 1 2' RCP , A-291P.37 0.005 To isim TC 187.95 34 LF Ve RCP MM 187.28 184.03 TC 106.50 - 0 O. 0-0 q1V RIM 185.W INV 181.44 Ao M ff- tLWI IM41 --jzLenv — — — TC 187.W%,,- 4&1 2- RCP 2 00.005 10 50 A"WMOMS 41 Co. m CormAtk% CIvK EngIrwers III MurkWAI Ptaowwrs Offices In Son JOSC, Cuportlow, SaUmas, Socrwwnto, FrOMM111, W4ktnUl Crook wid Redsood - 90 Archer Street,SOn Jose, iSI12 C40W 453-5373� I NDW • CK NAM MIC cm MOM 01199:ff w an THE PRUNEYAFO GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN RM in 143" - EXP. 0/31/Q1 CAMPOML 01 4 t �A W, h A Ik Xk y �v X > X V -7:1 fC 7 i :4 Y, 7�1 i q I r Y , \1 A 'I x" P k 'A + 'y R-2800 L- 86i.03 A= 1,0'37" !j CL �p p W40 "�s V, Li T a S RIM 11-877.0�O WCOM)WR ON) 200 LF 66 VCP 0-.01 14.90 + .90 r179 (MATCH EXIST) US T 9 3 20* �77];, ISIt P UMNG FOR C("WCTIC*i4p L ,. . _ .. -. , . - - - f .j_.. .. ~. _ .. - r•� — - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ---- ;71, UNDISTURBED EARTH FLANGE VALVE, IF REQUIRED BY PLAN (SEE SM. DETAIL W-4. FOR ANCHOR BLOCK DIMENSIONS) INSTALL INSULATED OUTLET PER SM. DETAIL W-16 IF WATER MAIN IS STEEL BRANCH PIPE SIZE L x H 200 PSI TEST 250 PSI TEST 3' OR 4" 1'5'xV5' 1'7xl*7' 6' 1'9*x1'9" 2'0"x2'0' a' 2'3*x2'3" 2*6'x2'6* 10, 3'0'.3'0' 3'6*x3'6' 12- 310 x 10' 4'4".4'4' 18, 5 W.V110, 1 6-6-4-6- TM THRMT BLOCK CENTER BEARING AREA ON PIPE AND FORCE LINE. L/2 a 4. /2" EX A. 10, coREDt"s WAYS L - INDTH UNDISTURBED EARN CONCRETE BLOCK DIMENSIONS - L x H (250 PSI TEST) 11 1/4- 22 112- 45* 90, 1'3*xl'O' I'8"X1,13" 2'0`x2'3* 2'6*x2'6* ONIV 1'8"x1,8* 2'3'x2'3' 3'0'xSO' 1'8'XV8, 2'3'x2'r 3,0*x3,0, 310"It3'IO' 2'0*x '0' 2'6*x2'6* 4'0'x 3'0' VO'x4' 2'0*x2'0 3-0-0-0- 4,0,x4*O' 6,0,.Yo* t 2'6"x2'0' 3'0*x3'0' 5'U'.4'0" 6*O*x6'0* 5*0*.4*0' 76'.4'0' 8'O'x6'O` ��MINIMUII I' CLEARA-CE TAPPING SLEEVE OR iNG SADDLE 4GE VALVE TAPPING VALVE .6' PLAIN CONCRETE ELBOW THRUST BLOCK . it 2'-0* CONCRETEVALVE BOX WITHC 'AST NOH 1" THICK AC 1'-2 1/4' /F RING SEAT AND LID MARKED -WATER' (CHRISTY G-5 OR APPROVED EQUAL) 11, FINISHED GRACE CONCRETE COLLAR 2' A. W *.A- WRENCH NUT 14 REBAR HOOP �---1/4%7" DIA. STEEL STEADYING PLATE .NON-METALLIC VALVE BOX EXTENSION (8* DIA-) 1-1/4* DIA. STEEL ROD STEM EXTENSION %n -2' A.W.W.A. WIENICH NUT VALVE KEY - TOP VALVE VALVE BOX WTAUATM DETALS Ji A"W "fowls AS 00. CM Erqiraerix Plovoers in so, J10", Cupw**W, stcrefterft. At re= WOWA 04" and 90 Archer S Un .00", "1 45-3--5373 933NO W - CK APPRINVZO mic , mpiFftm Nia vAim Ef CTTY DATE mmoumb DATE THE PFUNEYMM UTL" FILM CAMPBELL 2M M- -AVATA wwo-w P, TL aft, I/Ln/97 se" 11 - 40' X ERR D"m '"Wri9w NTSM"K SM 4 2111 In - REGISTOD Cr"L Rr-L IS 14M - Or WTIMM JO W 97084 -i -0. ..-+i��TfIIA!�.lsx'�� T�"p16TiT.---•--ac?Y"�.}c�^ �'._-�'�- „ j tt---�•.-- ). fr e + 7 II A• I t 1 : � +' ti NiSTALL $TRAY/ SEDN*NT BANW : • l ill J' f NWAU SILT ( { F 1 1NST tTR/►V0. F I ENff ✓ ter. L--'—�'--------------T—�- MAW n"MS a co. M CorwAI*% Clvl Engineers & Miidpnl %amens Offices In 34m Jost, Cupsr,*w, Salinas, Socreownto, Frtront. VolrNAt CreN( end Red eao ' Cityy 90 Archer StrMt, San Jost, Glatlfornla 95112 (400) 453-5373 Qt[ fs1aYAMAf� f = X OR aww r� AR�IDMY oxwe tow SECTION A — A .r rJea• c�\ x spKLIMIY (_S7AYP WdMESISCIAUNSW ki -J� �\— mm a _ • , 12 AM AN CmaS 154"AMOUZI Aft) \—DwgMOSM mw AM +JG' (!dm) AIL An>�r PLAN 1. AE tSA �i111L A• /IIIVLINEQ AV A coAmW ANT mu P!�'mw A�SSi14 � A�q�DK AW LOM Y m FAIT affa .. t 1NEW AWMW. WdELS s'NLL ff plplA 0 Plash m bvFwtA�' am P"KrC TEWORARY s 1IAov As13i/MP a ,n siwL RE GRAVEL Iara�IE „" AW ""1m'm CONSTRUCTION s ki r "w AR At&w mm ENTRANCE EXTT �lAw ol SECTION A —A A�840111111M AlW IV ME am now4w s IAD Q�F 4' F NM AR rw Awr fIVor Wow FJaICMNY Aff Av )w Qr A� 31R1tiRA1� ANY � AE%NSOIR): MD v + CK appowta A sY r TL DATE MTC 7/21/97 1000000I--�►qTY OBM� f RiIEMT �A V E, AW l rJM An - 97094 M7ADV[s sY THE w. ;I EROSION AND SEDFAENT ' CONTROL MEA ES I EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE EFFECTIVE .. FOR CONSTRUCTION DURING THE RAINY SEASON (OCT. 15 TO APRIL 15). 2 BEFORE THE STORM SYSTEM IS INSTALLED, NO WATER SHALL BE ALLOWED TO DRAIN INTO AN EXISTING UNDERGROUND SYSTEM. 3 AFTER THE UNDERGROUND STORM DRAIN SYSTEM IS INSTALLED, THE CATCH BASINS WILL BE INSTALLED (AS SOON AS PRACTICAL) AND HAY BALES WILL BE PLACED AROUND THOSE CATCH BASINS AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN AND IN THE DETAIL UNTIL THE STREETS ARE PAVED. 4 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE DRAIN ROCK AS A GRAVEL ROADWAY (8' MIN THICK FOR THE FULL WIDTH AND 50' LONG AT THE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TO SITE. ANY MUD THAT IS TRACKED ONTO PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE REMOVED THAT SAME DAY AND AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF SAN JOSE. 3 ALL EROSION MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL DISTURBED AREAS ARE STABILIZED AND CHANGES TO THIS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN SHALL BE MADE TO MEET FIELD CONDITIONS ONLY WITH THE APPROVAL OF OR AT THE DIRECTION OF THE CITY BUILDING OFFICIAL. 6 DURING THE RAINY SEASON ALL PAVED AREAS SHALL BE KEPT CLEAR OF EARTH MATERIAL AND DEBRIS. THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED SO AS TO MINIMIZE _`-DIMENT LADEN RUNOFF TO ANY STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM 7 ALL EROSION CONTROL FACILITIES MUST BE INSPECTED AND REPAIRED AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY DURING THE RAINY SEASON. 8 SEDIMENT TRAPS SHALL BE CLEANED OUT WHENEVER NECESSARY. 9 BORROW AREAS AND TEMPORARY STOCKPILES SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH APPROPRIATE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY BUILDING OFFICIAL. 10 ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES ARE TO BE PRCTECTED TO PREVENT OVERBANK FLOW. 11 INLETS WHICH ARE NOT USED IN CONDUCTION WITH A SEDIMENT BASIN SHOULD BE BLOCKED UNLESS THE AREA DRAINED IS UNDISTURBED OR STABILIZED. t2 ALL NEW INLETS ARE TO BE FITTED WITH FOSSIL FILTERS (SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET) EXTR4 STRENGTH nvER FABRIC NEEDED M7r}KN/T wAr MESH SUPPORT STEEL OR NO00 POs—r\ ATTACH FIL rER FABRIC SECURELY TO UPSTRE.W SIDE OF POST --7 _ . R1Ax 12' AAW. (JOOmm) �WRE SUPPOR /MUFENCSPAC/MC IN7N / 6' (l.Bm) AN.YI= SPACTNO N1rHour W/ilE SUAFlOYtr FENCE OR MAJOD POST w) HIGH ANX 9' MAX. (T15mm) STTUORAGE HT. 12' MIN. (JOOmm) DRAIN ROCK e OOmm) rREAL•H . COA/PA I 64CXFKL A1DrE3' i. s2T FENCE SHALL BE PLACED ON SLOPE NOT TO SCALE CONTOURS TO ,WX/ANZE PONIXNG EFFTCTENCY. 1. INSPECT AND REPA/R FENCE AFTER EACH STORM E4£NT AND REM101•£ 5�01VENT #?ACN (ECESSARY. 9' //I15rnm AH.17A/UA/ RECOM.MOED STOgfAGE r J>v RfAoOWAD -FA roo LCYBE arS'ED SILT FENCE { SED/A/ENT OFr-s1TE AND GIN Be PERANNE7m R SIASILIZEO J• FIL rER FABRIC ANY BE/ATTACHED TO rHE fFWF Mf/ERE POSSIBLE. �E EX/ST 4eovm CAR TM PMEYMM aaosiorl CONTPDL PI -AN S/01 1 MlL - KUSTF;M CIVL e.CL IR 14M - Co- tY„/AI CAMPBELL -0 1./ ACAD: 91140TEN.DWG PLOT DATE: 10/03/91 A LANDS OF SAN JOSE WATER WORKS 17 —765.00' ,LP.G E. ESMT 89t9 �_lsl / J7 A - 51.23'Of R - 1 12.00' L - 100.44 / PARCEL 3 \ 4.7 f ACRES SCALE 1"=40' • 7 - 0 n �1 O N f011111191 ��Loc000 I b Z Z 4 Jee\ Go �L 1 ✓ w W la%I ui O alol P.G.E. ESMT (8919 O.R. 205) I I I I I I I Q` N IC, � 4/ \RE ch �J \ \ \ G 64'09'25 R 20.00' �\\ L 22.40' i9 � 79.6— i a r- ui olWz Z > of f LANDS OF KUCICH ' \ N ---- — --t———----———————— — — — — —- -- \ I \ S.S.E. (9997 O.R. 158) r l fir-j! 4A al• • t b L.ro �y . b — — � I \ v IL O 1k III' v In• q �y I PARCEL 1 I I ��oJ\ 1.8 f ACRES = I I r\ \ I I I \\ 74' / /. _ _ I I I 47' I 107 I l I0 I� 1� Ircl a s7 1.oI lW o 01 I I I�I S L O.R. 158> (9997 5.5.E t 48) P.G.E. ESMT (8991 J.R. 688) ll I I� NOT. OF LOC. (9099 O.R. 343)PI • I I I I �7-1-7-T S.S.E. (9997 O.R. 155)— — — -T I ,! a • P.G.E I I r- II II I II II II II II ICI ICI ICI IN 101 lol ICI l°'l �"I 1N1 W �l I I 1 I� ll II ll S.S.E. (9997 O.R. 158) J 1 l II II II II wimm It9 O.R. 205) PARCEL 2 18.0 t ACRE'. 1 I 1 W IV Q. d V) 0 � N tB5 m v I I 47' I n I �n cici o� tA g G 90'00'00' I E R 50.UO' I '�' LLo BUS STOP ESMT L 78.54' ' l (E270 O.R. 275) ti . I — 1 O z 9� N1N1 as N1N1 Iiiiiiiii �B6 < CAMPBELL AVENUE ZI M LJ �IQ I NOT. OF LOG. 9099 O.R. 343 ` — � — A— I S.S.E. (9997 O.R. 152) I I I _156 NOTES: OwmwWvbo~: FW913011. ASSET MONAOBlENT COWAlff 707 91ROA9V*Vt,4VAW 12M MST SECTRAS CGWORATWk . MI CALWOWAA Sfl1iET SAN AIANCMCO, CA 94111 CIVIL f111MEM R: ,:AT9219 ALSOCIATIS,'SIC. �rAN itw�a�i-aaf�at ' ltSINi0M0 APN 29644-001. 009-006. AND 010-023 EXISTING USE: COMMERCIAL OFFICE'. OWMIL $HW& HOTEL. AND I111STAURANTS, TOTAL AREA: 27.2432 AGES. I NO PROPOSED CHANGE! IN LANs USE, PRE-EXISTING CONTOURS FROM CRY OF CAMIPRELL TOFOOIIAMOC MIUPL MUTUAL EASSAENTS FOR NIGI gRT1115 AND COMMULTION, OPMATION AND MAIRN ANCE OF PRIVATE UTIU TWS MILL 9E aWAM N THE.7WJ= COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND MYRICTIONS, NO PUKIC AREAS PROPOSED. EXISTING ZONING: C•2•S IGIFIAIAL COMMERCIAU." McBAIN AVENUE I r 1 z I � �10 F_Evv7RELL UU JUL 161992 J DIRN—E OrrY of LA>I ..cLL �4NNIN0 OE r..I+•t .T P,4f 9z - 0 3 BASIS OF BEARINGS: THE BEARING 'NORTH" OF THE CENTERLINE OF BASCOM AVENUE AS SHOWN UPON THAT CERTAIN 'RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN BOOK 244 OF MA:S AT PAGE 42, SANTA CLARA COUNTY RECORDS WAS TAKEN AS THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS MAP. TENTATIVE MAP FOR fHE PRUNEYARD BEING ALL OF THAT CERTAIN 27.243 3 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND SHOWN UPON THAT CERTAIN 'RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN BOOK 244 OF MAPS AT PAGE 42. SANTA CIARA COUNTY RECORDS AND LYING ENTIRi Y WITHIN THE CITY OF CAM -BELL, CAUFORNA SCALE: 1'=40' OCTOBER, 1991 SANDIS AND ASSOCIATES. INC. Engln"m Sur ayont, Plwwn 1 Mowltoin VAIN, G 94041-2011 415 969-6900 View 1 Existing Tree Legend (With aTrank Dia. Over 4") Tree No. Botanical Name Caliper Status I. Oka Euo pea multi-tnmk Renarin ' 2 "1'Ilea slip. '4- Remore 3. Olea Europea multi-tnmk Remain 4. Olea Europea multi -trunk Remain S. Eriohatna spp. 8" Remnre 6. Eriolwtnn spp. 8" Remnre 7. Fraxinus spp. 24' Remain 8. S,hinus Moll, 24- Remain 9. Eta'abpius Sideroxvlon 20" Remove 10. Sequoia sempe-irons 30" Remove IL Callistemon spp. 8" Remove 12. Lagerstroemia spp. 10" Remove privet 13. Aeacia Melanoxvlon 15" Remm 14. Lagerstroemia spp. 8" Remove privet 15. Lagerstroemia spp. 8" Remove privet 16. LaKerstrcxmia spp. 8" Remore privet 17. Ulm- spp. 20" Remo , 18. Magnolia spp. 20" Remair 19. Lagerstmemia spp. multi -trunk Remove 2u. Magnolia spp. IN" Remain 21. Magnolia spp. 18" Remain 22. Olea Europea multi -trunk Remain 23. Mvop -w 12" Remmw 24. Magnol— 10" Remore 25. Pvrus Kassakamn 8- Remore 26. Mvoponrm spp. 20" Remain 27. Magnolia spp. 14- Rem.: in 28. Ceratonia Siliquo mule- 10- Remain 29. Olea F-uropea nu lri-trunk Remain 30. Olea Europea multi-rrunk Remain 31. Ole,. Europea nw6i rrunk Remain 32. Quen.rs llex 6" Remo, e 33. Quemu+Super 10- Remnre 34. Melalewosp,, 24- Rename Key i o Existing Tree to Remain X� F Kisting Tree to be Removed QProposed Tree �u 0 30 60 Feet KENKAY ASSOCIA7 dS LandSLape Architecture & Ur- ar...esign 1045 Sansone Suee: - Studio 321 San Francisco, CA 94111 U 151956-4472 Oc CmIA � o 6 �XPOleiC-I'l 27�Y�— 28 _ 3 — — .- -� e IN129 View 2 '6 \7 Lx— Ii _10 7 View 2 Prune Yard Place Campbell, California 1? . __13 Terra Cotta Planters (4' & 23) Ash Urn (2) Wood Bench Trash Receptacle 20 _21 ,_ do ` o 7� Q View 1 ITT -1 KKA Project Number: 9718 Date: Jul:- 10, 1997 Scale: — 30 Sheet: 00000 0 10 20 40 Poet Sole: 112 0 70 60 MOM& M• Sok:1.240 PM11 ram= r5u � 0 10 20 10 Fan sale: l'-21 0 70 60 12.0 Moe Sok.1240 (E) PARKING LOT 1171 nT 1 A D r11D A TT PROPERTY LINE, TYP. (E) GUARDRAIL 0 O ■ Existing Tree Legend: Irrigation Notes 10 California Sycamore 20 Cali fomia Pepper 03 Palo Verde ® Evergreen Elm QRedwood © Pine O Willow State Roue 17 /1 AN if Aaa n. VT7^1 Tllr A Q 10 L AnL n\ rrD BhTQ eQ n 1'%f MT e QTATL DATrrlL V7 ® Myoporum O9 Eucalyptus 10 Alder 11 Jacaranda 12 Ash 13 Poplar 14 Mapie OU Unidentified PROPERTY LINE, TYP PROJECT AREA The landscape irrigation system shall be designed and built to comply with City of Campbell's codes and ordinances, the Caltrans Standard Specifications, July 1995, and the Caltrans Standard Plans, July 1997. The irrigation design shall include but not be limited to the following items: AUTOAL4TIC IRRIGA TICYCONTROLLERS Irrigation controllers shall be housed in a security enclosure. The controller shall have multiple program, repeat cycle, and flexible calendar capabilities with the required number of stations to operate all control valves within a nine -hour irrigation time frame while not exceeding hydraulic or electrical capacities of the designed irrigation system. TREE BUBBLERS Irrigation to the root zone of each tree shall be provided by bubblers that will allow acjustment for bubbler location and quantity as root zone growth occurs. Tree bubbler zones will be provided with a separate remote control valve from other stations on the controller. GATE VALVES A gate valve shall be provided for emergency shut off by Caltrans. See Exhibit I in the specifications. LA YYY.u:4 — R4 O ROOT CROWN 40mm ABOVE FINISH GRADE 50mm MULCH LAYER 100mm SOIL BERM CONTINUOUS ON FLAT AREAS AND DOWNHILL SIDES ONLY - ON SLOPES, BEGIN BERM AT EDGE OF ROOTBALL PREPARED BACKFILL MIX - SEE SPECS. SCARIFY SIDES OF HOLE SCARIFY EXISTING SOIL TO 150mm DEPTH PRUNEYARD MASTER PLAN WILSON CORNERSTONE San Mateo, California Developer ■ KENKAY ASSOCIATES Landscappe Architecture k Urban Design 1045 Sansome Street - Studio 321 San Francisco, CA 94111 1415, 956-4472 (4151 956-4522 Fax 1-28-99 Callan Encroachment Permit 94-98 City Review Pmlaee Il.obr 9ak 9801.01 `CARIES alaalaala�l>_w 1 aw 6-24-98 Landscape Buffer at State Route 17 © t iri�-riF'�[��,/�n\��' �ic��,<�"� �c 1�� O� •- 1� ��L ■ice/ •I `` E �� ' v � �' i ;t`.u1\�IJ�Lw i _ I� _�� — �i 1� � U l� . ► 1 / 1 1 � � � a i � r �V��.n��}'��a17 F:n 7``�t� �. vC"� � � 1 a , _ • g I e 1 4 II , ' 81 NI -4- 1999 S. BASCOM AVE. S 97-20/UP 97-11 7 OF 9 CITY OF CAMPHELL PLAN • 1 2/99 Public Notice of Availability SaepP/emelltary Dommart R Document Type: _Netaative Declaration (Mttgated) Date: 10 / 17 / 97 ProjnetTNN: SDP 97-01;S 97-20; UP 97-11 p Lot:atIon- The Pruneyard roject SpeeHle: 1999 S. Bascom Avenue project LW4"Ion • City: Campbell project Lotatlon _ County: Santa Clara County Description ofProject: t30.00 sq. ft . 6 story office building. and 4 level parking garage con'aining 809 parking spaces Lead Agency; Ci _ of Campbell tAgency Contact Person: Gloria Sciara. Planner II C.On Area CodvTelephone/Eztemuon: (401j) 866-2140 Address where document may be obtained: ,'.geaq Nsme• City of Campbell Community Development Department Street Address: 70 N. First Street City/State/Zip: Campbell, CA 95008 Publle Review Period: Begins 10 / 17 / 97 Ends 1 I / I l , 97 Public Hearing (a): Nol Dam: 11/11/97 Planning Comm.ssion Fine: 7:30 p.m. Council Chambers Ioca&n: 70 N. First Street, Campbell No 7 Date. 12/8/97 City Council Tine 7:30 p.m. Council Chambers loc-n..a: 70 N. First Street. Campbell Anyone interested in this matter is invited to comment on the document by written response cr by persottal appeararre at the hearing. Persons wishing to appear at the heanng should tail: Name: Phone: Signatare: �� ! J C'ett-era Nam. Rewdfamwy 1990 Title. Gloria Sciara (408) 866-2140 244 SVPrLErarurnVMXMAnON PARETTI 16 October1997 Kathy Kovar David 1. Powers & Associates, Inc. 1885 The Alameda 204 San Jose CA 95126 Fax 408-248-9641 Subj . New Pruneyard Office Building Dear Kathy. Regarding your questions, we submit the following Paoletu As>,i�.iuo-Inc .10 Gold Starr dw�waol aid Sun I nsd— :IuMn..wn(Air.—. 94113 73441.11 n79co mNu•u rn•. rn m 415 0' 0171 Fw 41 i 391 7610 I A conservative estimate of the "increase" in L. due to 1 /3 more traffic for the office building alone is about 1-2 dB. This would occur during the daytime hours only. No increase is expected at night (due to the Office Building) However, we believe that this is irrelevant because the component of noise due to the office building traffic is submerged in the noise of other traffic. 2 Three locations were measured. At the northwest comer of the Pruneyard property (along Highway 17), at the target shown on the enclosed site plan, and at the noitheut comer of the Ptuneyard property (along South Bascom Avenue). 3. We do not know what mitigation measures are planned for short term impacts because this is outside the scope of 90F90sak !!Gaper 1. Sciscca, AIA End Site plan cc: Jeanne Shook- Arterberry/F4x 408-371-3831 x+ rOMUa INX"C 'CAMDWM eJs ZO'd D00'0N 6S:01 Z6.9I 1D0 i£8£-IL£-80C OI JOSSH 8 NOS1IM W0111IM c Ppn ,wOPrIBEPC#P r.gPSTE�� 41S 98S 6387 199-110-16 09:M a4S8 P.02102 Hornberger+Worstell MATERIALS LEGEND nomMgpr wonrdl. Im 1'0 Mtlden LW Ac4d[cu rd ►la9an S. Fnrclrcn. (•VIA p W 101 415 191 1010 411 900 017 FAX Materials Legend Pruneyard Place Material Option 1. Precast Concrete Building Column Covers, Featured horuontal and vertical bands on Bldg. Elevations 2 Glass Type A Majority of Glass areas as indicated on Bldg. Elevations 3 Glass Type B Vision Glass at ground and second floors 4. Glass Type C Spandrel Glass at Bldg. ends (matching Tower Two) 5 Anodized Brown Aluminum Building Mullions Exterior Light Fixrares 6. Brushed Bronze Aluminum Vertical 'Fins' at Building Columns 7 Paint Color I Penthouse Poster color Garage Stairtower color Garage Stairtower metal Roof color 9 Punt Cola 2 Garage Palm :olor 9. concrete Color I Concrete accent bands 10. Concrete Color 2 Concrete field color 11 Slate Color 1 Slate Flooring at Building Entrance 12 Slade Color 2 Accent Slate at Building Lobby 13 Bronze Woven Mesh Suspended Decorative Screens at Bldg. Entry 14. Hackenbcty, Vander Shown Wood trim in Building Lobby Matmals Not Pmeyard Inn Stucco Color match existing Inn Wood Trim match elusting Inn Accent Color match existing Concrete color at courtyard Decomposed Granite at courtyard PLEASE CONTACT US IMMEDIATELY 11 YOU DO NOT RECEIVE ALL THE ABOVE ITEMS ""Lm of cAMIreE.L COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 70 N. FIRST STREET CAMPBELL. CA9i011a ISnxlW 2140 (409) SW$39i (fut) FAX To: Kathy Kovar, David J. Powers & Assoc. Fu: (408) 248-9641 From: Gloria Sciara, Project Planner OVA: October 10, 1997 M: Response to request for Information on Pruneyard Place Papa: 3 CC: G Urgent x For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑ Please Reply ❑ PIC" Recycle .., Please call me if you have questions. 1 can be reached at (408) 866-2143. Campbell Police Dept. response time-20 minutes: Non -emergency (achieved 78% of the time) Campbell Police Dept. response time-3 minutes: Emergency (achieved 75% of the time) Santa Clara County Fire ikpt. response time: 5 minutes (from rime call is received to arrival) Hazardous Materials uses by Compuware (pnssible tenant for 50% of new bldg): No -Office use only ©®0 bAVID J. POWEA ~ 140 ®®E Ms. Gloria Sciara Planner II City of Campbel I 70 North First Street Campbell. CA 95008 Dear Gloria: RE: Pruneyard Place Environmental Clearance October 10. 1997 O C i 1 4 1997 �p NNINGVDEPT. In order to complete the Expanded Initial Study for t.1e Pruneyard Place development we need additional information pertaining to the project. More specifically, to adequately analyze noise impacts we need the following information: I. An estimation of what the increase in noise levels due to additional traffic would be expressed in decibels. Although it is reasonable to assume that the existing noise environment is loud and that the project is not projected to significantly increase noise levels we do need to have data to defend this assumption. 7. A site map which indicates where the noise measurements were taken. 3. A detailed description of the mitigation measures included in the project expected to reduce short-term impacts (i.e.. limiting the hours ofconstruction operation etc.). In addition we would like to know whether the City of Campbell has any experience with similar projects in determining the threshold for the level of significance for short-term noise impacts that could occur. In particular we need to verify ho" lonr the garage construction will take. I appreciate your help in this matter. Feel free to call me at 008) 248-3500 or fax information to (408) 248-9641. Sincerely, i%L-r l� Kathy Kovar Project Manager 1 om—n-1.11 unwllanh l Planner. 11M1 IN \Id.,•lN'. ling,('A'Is 126•10 411x 24x ISOO•Ida 411x-24x1)671 Of t'4M,a i e CITY of CAMPBELL Community Development Department Current Planning October 9, 1997 Re: SDP 97-Ol/S 97-20/UP 97-11 - 1999 S. Bascom Averue - The Pruneyard Dear Applicant: Please be advised that the above -referenced application has been scheduled for the following meetings: Site and Architectural Review Committee Meeting Date: Thursday, October 16, 1997 Time: 6:15 p.m. Location: Alcove, Council Chambers, City Hall, 70 N. First Street, Campbell jrt'r•"y�,Ela,�nln4 Ot mlr IOn M ?[iyF Date: Tuesday, November 11, 1997 Time: 7 30 p.m. Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 70 N. First Street, Campbell Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at (408) 866- 2140. SSiincceerely, ��//�/Gloria Sciara Planner II cc: David Word & Jeanne Shook-Arterberry (Applicants/Property Owners) William Wilson & Associates 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 200 Campbell, CA 95008 Ron McLester, AIA Homberger & Worstell, Inc. 170 Maiden Lane San Francisco, CA 94108 70 North Firrt Street Campbell, Ghfomia 91otts, 1413 Ter 406.666. 2140 F. 408.866 8381 Too 406,$66.2790 CITY OF CAMPBELL Community Development Department Current Planning October 7, 1997 David Word, Vice -President William Wilson & Associates 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 200 Campbell, CA 95008 Re: Follow-up to Pruneyard Place Meeting of October 2, 1997 Dear Mr Word In regards :z) our last meeting, please find enclosed minutes of the meeting, and a copy of the recorded drainage easement that was required as a condition of approval for the remodel of the Pruneyard shopping center. A copy of the consultant services agreement with David J. Prwers & Associates has been forwarded to Jeanne Shook-Arterberry. If you should have any questions regarding this or any other matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at (408) 866-2143. Sincerely, Gloria Sciara Planner If cc: Jeanne Shook -Arterberry, CPM William Wilson & Associates i999 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 200 Campbell, CA 95008 70 North Fint Street Campbell, California 95009 1433 — 408. 866 2140 rill 408 866.8391 Too 406.$66. 3790 U r CITY of CAMPBELL Community Development Department Current Planning October 7, 1997 Jeanne Shook-Arterberry, CPM William Wilson & Associates 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 200 Campbell, CA 95008 Re. Follow-up to Pruneyard Place Meeting - October 2, 1997 Dcar Ms. Arterberry, In regards to our last meeting, please find encloses minutes of the meeting. A copy of the recorded drainage casement that was required as a condition of approval for the remodel of the Pruneyard shopping center has been forwarded to David Word. If you should have any questions regarding this or any other matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at (408) 866-2143. Sincerely, Gloria Sciara Planner II Cnciosure 70 North Flnt Street Campbell. California 91006. 1433 n! 408 $66 2140 FAX 408. 866 6361 too 408. 666.2790 CITY OF CAMPBELL Community Development Department Current Planning October 7, 1997 Ms. Jeanne Shook - Arterberry Leasing Director - The Pruneyard William Wilson & Associates 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 200 Campbell, CA 95008 Re: Consultant Services Agreement - Expanded Initial Study DearJeanne: Please find enclosed a signed copy of the Consultant Services Agreement for the Pruneyard Place Expanded Initial Study. It would be appreciated if William Wilson & Associates would forward the funds indicated on the estimate, S12,348, payable to the City of Campbell, within the next week. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (408) 866-2140. Thank you. Sincerely, ��G4J Gloria Sciara Planner 11 cc: Steve Piasecki, Community Development Director Sharon Fierro, Senior Planner 70 North Fine Street Gmpbell, CalilOrnia 95009. 1423 trl. 408 866.11e0 FAx 403. 366. 8361 r00 408, 866.1790 CAMPBELL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT — MEETING NOTES TO: Distribution FROM: Gloria Sciara, Project Planner DATE: Monday, October 6, 1997 SUBJECT Pruneyard Place Meeting -October 2. 1997 MEETING PARTICIPANTS 1. David Word --William Wilson tl& Associates liam Wilson Associates 2, Jeanne Shook Arterberry -- 3. Aon McClester -- Horberger + Worstell. Inc. 4. Charles Misster -- Horberger + Wurstell. Inc. 5. Bill Helms — Public Work Department 6. Peter Eakland -- Public Work Department 7. Harold Housley -- Public Work Depam .ent g. Kirk Heinrichs — Redevelopment Agency 9. Sharon Fierro — Community Development Department 10, Glora Sciara — Community Development Department PURPOSE 1. To discuss the status of issues involved in processing the development application for Pruneyard Place including environmental studies. 2 Continue dialogue regarding final project design and site related issues. 3. Res iew of projected timelines for hearing/approval process. nt a tO�R TOPICS Fnvironmental Issues -Discussions focused on the status of consultant se issues and studies underway. The four areas under review by staff and consultant services include the expanded traffic study. Campisi Way extension land/improvement appraisal, expanded noise analysis, and potential air quality impacts. The studies are needed for two reasons: To ascertain what impacts are associated with the project development, so all panics understvnd the anticipated conditions of approval, mitigation measures and development agreements that will arise. To provide sufficient information to the Consultant to prepare at.. environmental document that complies with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Prunevard Place Meeting Notes -October 2, 1997 Page-2- STUDIES Traffic Study: Peter Eakland is generating the traffic counts for several scenarios including levels of service (LOS) for the intersections in the vicinity of the Pruneyard. The traffic counts will be used by lack Greenspan, traffic consultant, to prepare an expanded traffic analysis of the project including an evaluation of on -site circulation. The traffic counts factor in the cumulative impacts of several projects currently under review or projects in a pre -application phase that would have an impact on critical intersections. The evaluation of cumulative impacts is necessary to complete the expanded initial study by David Powers and Associates and determine appropriate traffic mitigation measures. Schedule: Traffic projections to be rompleted and faxed to Jack Greenspan on 1013NZ Campisi Way Extension: The City executed a contract with Chris Camegie on September 23.1997 to appraise land and future construction cost to extend Campisi Way. Bill Helms is coordinating the appraisal. David Word and Jeanne Arterberry expressed interested in obtaining an, estimate prior to the final report. Bill indicated that he would see if a verbal estimate is available before the written report is submitted. Obtaining a preliminary cost estimate would facilit4te discussions regarding the timing of construction, site plan revisions including Los Gatos Creek Trail connection, and contribution amount with David and Jeanne. Schedule: Obtain verbal estimate be 10/1 //97 ijavailahle. Noise Studies: Paoletti Associates, noise consultants, submitted a follow-up to the letter to response to City's request for additional information on single event noise levels, and interior noise levels of the apartment units adjacent :o the northern property line. Gloria indicated concerns about the data and responses particularly in regarding the interior noise levels of the Aloha apartments. David gave same background about how the information was obtained. We agreed to have David Powers speak directly to Paoletti Associates to clarify detail:. of the noise analysis to ensure compliance with the expanded initial study. Air Quality Gloria indicated that proposed project does not exceed the Bay Area Air Quality Management District thresholds of generating over 2,000 or greater vehicle trips per day. She explained that the hotel expansion was previously reviewed under the environmental document adopted by the City Council for the remodel of the shopping center. Cumulative impacts (project + hotel) would exceed thresholds by 5% however, discussions with David Powers concluded that an air quality analysis would not be required for the project. Environmental Assessment: The consulting firm of David J. Powers and Associates, Inc. was selected to prepare the expanded initial study. Gloria indicated that the contract would be signed October 2, 1997. The expanded initial study is expected to be completed within a 3 week time period (possibly non-consecutive weeks) subject to all studies being Pruneyard Place Meeting Notes -October 2, 1997 Page -3- completed and containir6 sufficient analysis. The final report would be finished after the 20 day advertisement deadline for the Planning Commission meeting of November 11. 1997. David inquired how this would affect the timing of the hearing process. Gloria indicated that if a draft of the expanded initial study is provided by the 17'" and the C^mmunity Development Department was comfortable with the draft, the application could be advertised without delay. Timeline: October 23, 1997-- Tentative Completion Date of the expanded initial study Architectural Details: The central areas of discussion with Gloria, Sharon, Ron and Charles (in a prior meeting) focused on the design details, materials, and landscape plan for the parking garage. Gloria provided photographs of other successful parking garage landscape concepts to Ron and Charles. She raised concern over the repetitiveness of the design on the east and west elevations of the parking garage. Ron indicated that the landscaping would screen the structure in time. Sharon requested clarification on the type of tree proposed around the garage, and more accurate perspectives of the garage. Timeline: Available derails to be provided by Fridav October /0. 1997 Drainage Plan: Bill Helms responded to the drainage plan that was submitted as a completeness requirement for the Pruneyard Place application. Bill indicated that the drainage plan was incomplete because it did not show the entire property (only office portion) or details on the location of all existing drainage lines, catch basins, and other drainage facilities, or the proposed drainage facilities. Bill also indicated that the site plan shows part of the garage structure and the proposed outfall lines encroaching into the 20' drainage easement reserved for the City. He indicated that either scenario would not be permitted by the City. The questions then arose as to the existence of the 20' easement. The Pruneyard Associates could not find evidence of it on the Preliminary Title Report, or that it was recorded. Harold Housley indicated that he had reviewed the easement description. ACTION ITEMS I. City to provide a copy of the 20' drainage easement to William Wilson and Associates. (Done 10/7/97) 2. City to provide traffic counts to Jack Greenspan, traffic consultant. (Done 10/6/97) 3. City to execute consultant services agreement and provide copy to William Wilson and Associates. (Done 1013197) 4. Homberger + Wotstell to provide architectural details and materials samples to Community Development Department, 5 Civil Engineer for William Wilson and Associates to develop master drainage plan satisfactory to City. NEXTSTEP Prepare sufficient project details and revised site plans indicating the entire site, the Campisi Way extension, and location of garage structure outside the drainage easement for review by staff prior to preliminary Site and Architectural Review Committee meeting on Thursday October 16, 1997. 96os�>�tltl �, 110 1 abed 1131SHOWH39H38N80H9S:►C:EOL66l'90JagOPO'Repu0lq PRUNEYARD DEVELOPMENT MEETING AGENDA Thursday, October 2, 1997 2:30 P.M RALPH DOETSCH ROOM I. ST�,_iUS OF PROJECT STUDIES • Traffic Study: Completion of traffic scenarios by City Traffic Engineer • Noise Study: Additional noise analysis: Review of new by consultant for compliance with CEQA—Minimum standards • Air Quality -Possibility due to traffic generation thresholds -determination to be made. • Camptsi Way extension-Land/Construction Estimate -Contract executed 9/23/97-Completion date 10/14/97- Seeking earlier verbal estimate 11. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT • Consultant Selected -David Powers and Associates M. ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS • Garage Design -trellis, courtyard details, perspectives, conceptual landscape I plan • Office Design -Updates to equip. enclosure? IV. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS • Status of Site Plan -Reflecting Campisi Way extension V. PROJECT SCHEDULE • Time Lines lalOI5 % J • • '� Al `Pa n Lu..l.ui ,.�" inl... IrH.. In rl.l •�n...l V L'J T T I ........... 1997 t. bn......uul l.....r. (Aif—iu'11133 113 .4'llul:l F:n I I"Pll "bpi I October 1997 RECEIVED Ms. Gloria Sciara, Planner 11 OCT U Community Development Department 2 1997 City of Campbell 70 C17-Y OF CAMPBELL North First Street PLANNING D DEPT. CampWI CA 95009-1423 Fax 408-866 8381 Subj.. The Letter of 22 September 1997 concerning Noise at Pruneyard Place PA Project 97004 1 Dear Ms. Sciara l Paoletti Associates Inc has reviewed the noise impact based on traffic levels estimated by Linscott Law & Greenspan Engineers There are no noise levels generated by the estimated volume of traffic that increases the DNL at the Apartment Complex predicted in our letter of 21 July 1997. The reason for this is the dominance of the noise from Highway 17 and South Bascom Avenue. We understand that all construction scheduling will be in conformance to City of Campbell Noise 0,dinances regarding construction noise (i e , time of day restrictions) We understand from the developers that there will be NO PILING DRIVING 3. We have estimated the transmission of sound due to the makeup of the walls of the adjacent apartment units having general information about the walls. We understand that the glass is 1/8" thick and therefore limit, the sound transmission loss We estimate that the window/wall combination has a sound transmission class of about STC about 25 4 The noise reduction from a sound wall varies with factors mostly do with distance and height of sound sources. However, for initial estimates, we can be certain that if there is no obstruction of line -of -sight (upper Floors) there will be no sound attenuation Otherwise, one can rely on about 5 dB of attenuation behind a sound screen Higher values are possible depending on the exact conditions. 5. Our noise study was planned to verify existing noise conditions at the site so that we could estimate the impact of additional traffic It was not designed to identify existing nighttime single source events that have nothing to do with increased traffic during business hours. However a review of our hourlt, mn ltel lettl summaries shows higher single event activity only twice during the nighttime hours (in the hour from around 9 to 10 P M and from 1 1 to midnight (i,e , none at Ms. Gloria sciara, Planner II t" t "w -. Community Development Department 1 City of Campbell j I October1997 Page 2 10-11:00 P.M. or at other morning hours.) These single events surely are associated with the Hotel. We fail to see the connection to the increase traffic during the day due to the proposed Office building. Wt understand from Pruneyard that trash pickup is after 6:00 A.M. and will remain so after the completion of the office building. No other single event activity was recorded during the nighttime hours. We think future single event activity will probably remain the same. 6. Mitigation measures can only be addressed when specific noise sources can be identified. We would like to stress that the current noise environment is overwhelmingly dominated by the noise from the Freews and South Bascom Avenue. Sincerely, PAO 1 ASS ATE C • Gasper J. Sciacca, AIA cc: Jeanne Shook-Arterberry/Fax: 408-371-383I x��_rGatntsncW97M CAXfflkxns.Gis i .ar �, oc PASOC S S IIIC. October 14, 1997 l a Gloria Sciara PRECEIVED Planner II City of Campbell 70 North First Street OCT 16 1997 Campbell CA 95008 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING DEPT'. Dear Gloria: RE: Prunevard Place Environmental Clearance I received the traffic analysis this morning from Linscott, Law and Greenspan. If it is determined that the traffic analysis is adequate to serve our purposes acco ding to our contract the Draft Initial study is due two weeks hence which is October 29, 1997. We have reviewed the traffic analysis and have several questions and/or concerns that need clarification. I. It appears that the analysis did not address the Valley Transportation Authority Congestion Management Program (CMP) which requires an analysis of regional facilities. 2. The traffic analysis contains an error relating to impacts on City of San Jose facilities. The City of San Jose's level of service policy is LOS "D" or better. In addition, projects which add more than 1% volume to an intersection operating at LOS "E" or worse is considered significant. As a result it appears that the project would have significant cumulative impacts. 3. It would be helpful if the future location of the Campisi extension were identified on a site plan to determine whether the proposed garage would impact future circulation and the proposed connection with Union Avenue. 4. the traffic report mentions the Maxim and Winchester Drive Inn projects. Are these proposed but not approved projects? F:minmmental l'4nwltan1%& Planner. A I \FS -Ihe ��...... • tiun, 'IFl •tiara ln,�. l'�1'I51 'n • Icl 4II4 141 I11M1. 1',1, 409 24911641 • AI % Gloria Sciara Page 2 1'd appreciate it if you could provide clarification of thesc issues. If you would like 1 can contact Linscott. Law and Gre:.nspan to answer some of these questions. Also, have you received any additions: information on noise? I will also continue to try to contact Paoletti Associates regarding the information requested in my October I Oth letter to you. Thank you again for your help in this matter. Sincerely, 2ath�� 1 1� Project Manager Q A FCARNEGHI-BAUTOVICH & PARTNERS, INC. Real Estate Appral-11 R Ca11sa11a1ts In Vtban EC-0—s APPRAISAL OF: PROPOSED PARTIAL TAKE n ALOHA APARTMENTS n I CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA n n n PREPARED FOR: CITY OF CAMPBELL CAMPBELL, CALIFORNLA �E OCTOBER 1997 97-ASJ-341 9 r r 1 CePCARNEGHI-BAUTOVICH & PARTNERS, INC. r. iI Estate Appraisers & Consultants in Urban Economics t\ October 15, 1997 1 A I n Mr. Kirk E Heinrichs, AICP Redevelopment Coordinator City of Campbell, City Manager's Office 'a 70 North First Street J Campbell, California 95008-1423 Re 97-ASJ-341, Appraisal n Aloha Apartments Campbell, California n Dcar Mr Heinrichs At your request and authorization, Cameghi-Bautovich & Partners, Inc , has prepared a limited scope appraisal in summary report format which estimates the total just compensation due for the proposed Campisi Way extension as it affects the fee simple interest in the Aloha Apartments property, located at 1845 South Bascom Avenue, in the City of Campbell, Santa Clara County, California It is limited in scope in that the subject property owner has not been contacted for this assignment, the interiors of the subject's improvements have not been inspected, and information regarding occupancy, income, and expenses has riot been reviewed The extension of Campisi Way through a west -central portion of the site requires the fee simple taking of a reported 6,300 square feet of land, as well as the demolition of a carport structure and other site improvements There is no taking of any building improvements However, it is our opinion that severance damages to apart of the Aloha Apartments' units result from the Campisi Way roadway extension The subject larger parcel is a three -building, 105-unit apartment development located in a mixed -use -. section of Campbell. The Pruneyard shopping center complex is adjacent to the south (including a ..ommunity shopping center, two high-rise office towers, and the Pruneyard Inn hotel), and retail, restaurant, and office buildings are adjacent to the north Land owned by San Jose Water Works borders the site to the west, beyond which is Los Gatos Creek The Aloha Apartments comprises three, two to three-story buildings of fair -to -average quality and condition which were built between i 961 and 1963 according to public records. Construction is wood frame, and the apartment design is garden -style Parking on the underlying 3 18-acre site includes both surface spaces and covered carports Occupancy appears to be at or near 100 percent at present, due to the absence of a marketing sign on the site. The property is identified by the County Assessor as parcel numbers 288- `1 03-004, 005, and 006, and is owned by Kucich Limited, according to public records A preliminary title report was not provided to confirm this ownership ad San Francleco Olactir • 250 Montgomery St. Ste 210 • San Francisco CA 94104 . 415 398-2666 • FAX 415 399-8910 an Sloso Oalce • 1602 The Alameda. Ste 205 -Son Jose CA 95126 • 408 535-0900 • FAX 408 53&0909 to i M Mr. Kirk Heinrichs - 2 - October 15, 1997 14 The purpose oft" ; appraisal is to estimate the total just compensation due for the proposed Campisi n Way extension as it affects the fee simple interest in the subject property. The reported function of this appraisal is for the exclusive use of the City of Campbell for project planning and budgeting purposes While the conclusion presented herein estimates total just compensation associated with a proposed partial taking, the summary report format is not suitable for an actual condemnation. The report should not be used or relied upon by any other panda for any reason. We have made a personal inspection of the subject property The scope of this appraisal report is to utilize appropriate approaches to value, in accordance with Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP), to arrive at an estimate of total just compensation Specific steps including an exterior inspection of the subject property and the research and analysis of comparable data to arrive at the value indication put forth in the following appraisal report. Our analyses and pertinent data relative to the market value estimate are presented in the attached report This is a limited scope appraisal in summary report format I. TOTAL JUST COMPENSATION ESTIMATE - APPRAISAL SCENARIO The extension of Campisi Way :trough the Aloha Apartments site is illustrated on the facing page exhibit This proposed right-of-way requires the fee simple taking of 6,300 square feet of land which is currently improved with asphalt and concrete paving, wood fences and landscaping (at the north and south perimeters of the take boundaries), and a 22-space carport structure These improvements will be demolished and replaced with a 42-foot wide extension of Campisi Way, connecting the current cul-de-sac terminus to the north with interior roadways of the Pruneyard shopping center to the south The first part of this appraisal presents what is considered to be the most probable just compensation estimate for the right-of-way extension project, in accord with the following market value definition. Definition of Market Value (Code of Civil procedure) The fair market value of the propertv taken is the highest price on the date of valuation that would be agreed to by a seller, being willing to sell but under no particular or urgent necessity for so doing, nor obliged to sell, and a buyer, being "t ready, willing and able to buy but under no particular necessity for so doing, each t dealing with the other with full knowledge of all the uses and purposes for which the property is reasonably adaptable and available. The fair market value of the property taken for which there is no relevant market is its value of the date of valuation as r determined by any method of valuation that is just and equitable (1263 320 CCP) tta CBP CARNEGHI-BAUTOVICH & PAWNE PS IN( 97ASJ341 rT y | |� || ■} |f| ��| ■ |||i� |�| |■a �1�, | '■||i| |!+ ��| �,!| !|!| � E � � § -ox \ a � §| } \ 7 f(Z ■k!$ e ,«\$ s�!$ 2�!$ 2 f , s ■ k§ � I Mr. Kirk Heinrichs - 3 - October 15, 1997 A Just compensation combines the fee simple market value of property taken with severance r. damages resulting from the partial take. The latter can be offset by any special benefits which accrue to the remainder property as a result of the project. .. A. FEE SIMPLE VALUE OF PROPERTV ACQUIRED The Campisi Way roadway extension requires the taking of a reported 6,300 square feet of land from a west -central portion of the subject site, as well as an existing carport structure and site improvements. 1. Fee ,Simple Market Value of Land The fee simple market value of acquired land is based on prices recently paid for similar sites in the local market area These sales are identified on the facing page table In analyzing each transaction, considerations are made for market change (time), locational characteristics including accessibility and surrounding development, purchaser motivations with respect to 'he intended use of the property after acquisition, and physical factors including size, shape, topogra- phy, visibility, and proximity to surrounding surface streets and freeways. The unit of comparison most widely used by buyers and sellers of these sites is the price per square foot of land area, with attention to the allowable density of deve:or,eont The five sales used in the fee simple land valuation analysis reflect prices ranging from $15 20 to $28 97 per square foot, with total assemblage indications (four of the five were part of multiparcel acquisitions) of S 17.28 to S25 69 per square foot The subject larger parcel site is an elongated, irregularly -shaped property with limited frontage on South Bascom Avenue Its configuration and proximity to hotel, office, and retail uses are all negative influences with respect to its appeal as an apartment development site These factors, in conjunction with currently strong market conditions for apartment construction, support the use of a value indication at the midpoint of the exhibited ranges In the analysis of fee simple land value, a S22.00 per square foot market value indication is selected This results in the following initial component ofjust compensation Fee Simple Land Value 6,300 square feet of land x S22 00 per sq ft = $138,600 CBP CARNEGH6BAUTOVICH & PARTNERS INC 97ASMI ;1 Mr. Kirk Heinrichs 2. 3. 4 - October 15, 1997 Depreciated Replacement Cost of Acquired Improvements The depreciated cost of acquired improvements are also estimated. An approximate 4,800 square foot, 22-space carport structure will be removee from the site, as will asphalt and concrete paving, fencing, and landscaping within the partial take bounds. Based on information contained in the Marshall Valuation Cost Estimating Service, the following estimates are concluded for each of these partial take components Depreciated Replacement Cost of Improvements Carport 4,800 square feet x f 13 34 per sq ft = $64,032 Paving 6,300 square feet x $2 00 per sq ft = 12,600 Fencing 84 linear feet x $15 00 per linear foot = 1.260 Total Replacement Cost New = $77,892 Estimated to be 50 percent depreciated x 50 Depreciated Replacement Cost $38 946 Rounded $39,000 Plus Replacement Cost of Landscaping = 500 Total Depreciated Replacement Cost of Improvements $39,500 Total Fee .Simple Valise of property Acquired Combining the market value of the acquired land with the depreciated replacement cost of improvements within the boundaries of the partial take area, the following fee simple value estimate is produced for the proposed acquisition Fee Simple Acquisition - Land Value $138,600 Depreciated Replacement Cost of Improvements S 39-500 Total Fee Simple Value of Property Acquired S178,100 CBP CARNEGHI-BAUTOVICH & PARTNERS. INC tnAatM I I Mr. Kirk Heinrichs - 5 - October 15, 1997 B. SEVERANCE DAMAGES The second component of total just compensation is severance damages to the remainder property which are a result of the partial take and roadway extension. Campisi Way will run through a portion of the property which is adjacent to the westernmost of the subject's existing apartment buildings (Building A) Several of the eastern facing units within Building A will suffer the deleterious effects of proximity to anew roadway Additionally, the elimination of 22 carports will result in this number of project units being required to utilize surface spaces elsewhere in the project At present, there appears to be one carport for each unit in the develoonent, as well as 49 surface spaces There are 15 eastern -facing apartment units within Building A which will border on C the Campisi Way extension in the after project condition Five are situated on each of the structure's three levels Based on information extracted from locally competing apartment developments, it is estimated that achievable economic rental rates for these units will decline by approximately $25 00 per month, or $300.00 per annum, due to the impact of the new roadway This results in a total gross income decrease of $4,500 per year for the Aloha Apartments As operating expenses will most likely be unchanged, this total translates as a net income loss as well C Based on recent apartment building sales in the local area, it is estimated that the market would value this property by use of an 8 0 percent overall capitalization rate When applied to the $4,500 per year net income reduction due to the right-of-way Cextension, an estimate of severance damages to the property is indicated at $56,250 Secondly, a total 22 apartments will not have the use of carport parking spaces in the C after project condition Based again on local area rental data, it is estimated that these affected units will suffer a monthly income loss of $20 00 for this factor, equivalent to $240 00 per year The total impact on the project's gross income is resultantly C $5,280, which amounts to 566,000 when capitalized at 8 0 percent The $66,000 severance damage estimate from the loss of the carports is additionally supported by information contained in the Marshall Valuation Service As illustrated previously in C this report, the cost new of a 4,800 square foot carport (for 22 spaces), is estimated at 564,032 This illustrates that, at a cost of 566,000, the owner of the property could elect to replace the eliminated carports on another part of the site which presently has j� surface spaces j' Combining the capitalized value of net income loss to the Building A units, at C 556,250, with the capitalized value of net income loss due to the elimination of 22 carport parking spaces, at 566,000, results in a total estimate of severance damages at S 122,250 This is rounded to $122,000. CBP CARNEGHI-BAUTOVICH & PARTNERS INC. tm►vsa 1 I A Mr. Kirk Heinrichs -6- October 15, 1997 Based on an analysis of the Campisi Way fight -of -way extension and its impact on the Aloha Apartments, in the after project condition, there are concluded to be no special Denefits accrued to the property as a result of the project. C. TOTAL JUST COMPENSATION ESTIMATE Total Just Compensation combines the fee simple market value of property acquired for the right-of-way extension with severance damages to the remainder property which are a direct result of the project. These were estimated above, and are summed to arrive at the following Total Just Compensation indication Total Fee Simple Value of Property Acquired $178,100 Estimated Severance Damages to Remainder Propery S122,QQQ Total Just Compensation Estimate $300,100 Therefore, based on our research and analyses, and subject to the assumptions and limiting conditions to follow, it is the opinion of the undersigned that the total just compensation due for the proposed Campisi Way right-of-way extension as it affects the Aloha Apartments property, as of October 14, 1997. would have been. THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ("N'100) 11. TOTAL JUST COMPENSATION ESTIMATE - LITIGATION SCENARIO This section of the appraisal presents an analysis of a hypothetical litigation or "worst case scenario' for the acquisition of property required for the Campisi Way right-of-way extension. It follcws a methodology similar to that outlined above, but uses variables which could be suggested by a litigious property owner for the values of acquired land and improvements, and damages to the remainder property which are a result of the project The "worst case scenario" valuation is offered for purposes of project planning and budgeting A. FEE SIMPLE VALUE OF PROPERTY ACQUIRED 1. Fen Simple Marker Value of /and Based on the land sales presented previously in this appraisal, an argument could be made for establishing the fee simple value of -the partial take site area C-E3P CARNFGHI-BAUTOVICH & PARTNER; Irv,. nAsnu N Mr. Kirk Heinrichs - 7 - October 15, 1997 at as much as S27 00 per square foot of land The use of this indication results in the following initial component of just compensation Fee Simple Land Value 6,300 square feet of land x $27 00 per sq.fl = $170,100 2. Depreciated Replacement Cost of Acquired Improvements The depreciated cost of acquired improvements was previously estimated based on information contained in the Marshall Valuation Cost Estimating Service. While an attempt was made to use indications which reflect accurate replace- ment costs, the Marshall Valuation Service identifies ranges for a variety of different construction types and classifications A case could be made for replacement cos'.; new which are as much as 50 percent greater than those used previously This would result in the following depreciated replacement cost for the acquired improvements Depreciated Replacement Cost of Improvements Carport 4,800 square feet x $20 01 per sq ft = $96,048 Paving 6,300 square feet x $3 00 per sq ft = 18,900 Fencing 84 linear feet x $22 50 per linear foot = 1-890 Total Replacement Cost New = $I 16,838 Estimated to be 50 percent depreciated x .50 Depreciated Replacement Cost $58,419 Rounded $58,500 Plus Replacement Cost of Landscaping = 500 Total Depreciated Replacement Cost of Improvements $59,000 CBP CARNEGHI-BAIJTOVICH &PARTNERS INC ntivH1 A IN Mr. Kirk Heinrichs 8 - October 15, 1997 A 3. Total Fee iimple Value ojProperty Acquired n Combining the market value of the acquired land with the depreciated replacement cost of improvements within the boundaries of the partial take area, the following "worst case scenario" fee simple value estimate is produced Fee Simple Acquisition - Land Value $170,100 Depreciated Replacement Cost of Improvements 159.000 Total Fee Simple Value of Property Acquired $229,100 B. SEVERANCE DAMAGES As noted previously, Campisi Way will run through a portion of the property which is adjacent to the westernmost of the subject's existing apartment buildings (Building A) It also will be near Building B, although the distance from and design of this structure led to the appraisers concluding that there would be no negative impact on the 38 units in that building. A litigious owner caild argue that Building B's units are adversely affected by the right-of-way extension, due to increased road noise and traffic on the adjacent Pruneyard Drive aisle, and that the entire 30 units in the Building A structure (rather than the 15 previously concluded) are impacted Furthermore, using an increased monthly rent loss of $50 00 per unit per month as applied to the total 58 units in Buildings A and B, an annual gross income reduction of S34,800 results When capitalized at 8 0 percent, a total $435,000 in severance damages is suggested under the "worst case scenario" for the impact on rental unit income For the total 22 apartments which will not have the use of carport parking spaces in the after project condition, the owner could argue that these affected units will suffer a greater monthly income loss of perhaps $40 00 for this factor, equivalent to $10,560 per year, which amounts to $132,000 when capitalized at 8 0 percent Alternatively, this could reflect an increased cost to replace the carports on another part of the site .. Combining the capitalized value of net income loss to the Building A and B units, at $435,000, with the capitalized value of net income loss due to the elimination of 22 carport parking spaces, at $132,000, results in a total estimate of severance damages at S567,000 r �1 r CBP CARNI (fil hAUTOVICH & PARTNERS. INC OTAN341 OR Mr. Kirk Heinrichs - 9 - October 15, 1997 C. LITIGATION SCENARIO JUST COMPENSATION ESTIMATE Under the litigation, or "worst case scenario" analysis, the summation of the fee simple market value of property acquired with severance damages to the remainder property which are a direct result of the project, are estimated as follows Total Fee Simple Value of Property Acquired $229,100 Estimated Severance Damages to Remainder Property S567, Total Just Compensation Estimate $796,1Of' Rounded $800,000 This "worst case scenario" valuation is not the appraisers' opinion of total just compensation due the property owner for the proposed partial taking, but rather is based on variables which could be suggested by a litigious property owner and is offered for purposes of project planning and budgeting. Ill. ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS Specific Assumptions and Luniting Conditions I This is a limited scope appraisal in summary report format It s limited in scope in that the subject property owner has not been contacted for this assignment, the interiors of the subject's improvements have not been inspected, and information regarding occupancy, income, and expenses has not been reviewed 2 The function of this appraisal is reported to be for project planning and budgeting purposes. While the conclusion presented herein estimates total just compensation associated with a proposed partial taking, the summary report format is not suitable for an actual condemnation 3 At the client's request, the property owner has not been contacted for this assignment. The appraisal was completed based on an exterior inspection of the improvements, and with no information provided by the owner 4 Building plans were not provided for this appraisal Information regarding the subject's improvements was derived from our inspections of the property, information contained in public records, and discussions with the client. This appraisal assumes that this information, as presented herein, is correct. CBP CARNEGHI-BAUTOVICH & PARTNERS. INC. ��t>.t A Mr. Kirk Heinrichs I A ,J w M 0 - 10- October 15, 1997 5 A Preliminary Title Report was not provided for this assignment. It is assumed that there are no easements nor restrictions affecting the site that would be detrimental to the use or marketability of the property. Genera/ Assumptions and Limiting Conditions 6 The appraiser assumes that there are no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, its subsoils, or the stiucture (including toxic contamination), which would render it more or less valuable The appraiser assumes no responsibility for such conditions, or for engineering which might be required to discover such factors. It is assumed that no soil nor groundwater contamination exists as a result of chemical drainage or leakage in connection with fuel storage tanks on or near the property 7 It is the client's responsibility to read this report and to inform the appraiser of any errors or omissions of which he/she is aware prior to utilizing this report or making it available to any third party 8 No responsibility is assumed foi legal matters It is assumed that title of the property is marketable and it is free and clear of liens, encumbrances and special assessments other than as stated in this report 9 Plot plans and maps are included to assist the reader in visualizing the property Information, estimates, and opinions furnished to the appraiser, and contained in the report, were obtained from sources considered reliable and believed to be true and correct However, no responsibility for accuracy of such items furnished the appraiser is assumed by the appraiser 10 Al! information has been checked where possible and is believed to be correct, but is not guaranteed as such I I In this assignment, the existence (if any) of potentially hazardous materials used in the construction or maintenance of improvements or disposed of on the site has not been considered These materials may include (but are not limited to) the existence of formaldehyde foam insulation, asbestos insulation, or toxic wastes The appraiser is not qualified to detect such substances The client is advised to retain an expert in taus f eld 12 The appraiser is not required to give testimony or appear in court in correction with this appraisal unless arrangements have been previously made. 13 Possession of this report, or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication. It may not be used for any purpose by any person other than the party CBP CARNEGHI-BAUTOVICH & PARTNERS. IN_ VIASUrt 1 ' Mr. Kirk Heinrichs 11 - October 15, 1997 ' to whom it is addressed without the written consent of the appraiser, and in any event ' only with the proper written qualification, only in its entirety, and only for the contracted intended use as stated herein 14 Neither all nor part of the contents of this report shall be conveyed to the public through advertising, public relations, news sales, or other media without the written consent and approval of the appraiser, particularly as to the valuation conclusions, the identity of the appraisers, or any reference to the Appraisal Institute or the MAI designation APYRAICER CERTIFICATION We the undersigned hereby certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief the statements of fact l contained in this report are true and correct, the reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are l limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are our personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions, we have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and we have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved, our compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined value or a direction in value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value estimate, the [ attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event, the appraisal assignment was not based on a requested minimum valuation, a specific valuation, or the approval of a loan, our analyses, opinions, and conclusions were developed, and this report has been prepared in conformity Lwith the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice and the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute, we have made a personal nspection of the property that is the subject of this report, no one provided significant professional assistance to the persons signing this report The use of this report is subject to the requirements of the Appraisal Institute relating to review by its duly authorized representatives As of the date of this report, Chris Carneghi and Jeffrey Enright have completed the requirements under the continuing education program of the Appraisal Institute The appraisers certify that our education, experience, and knowledge of the San Francisco Bay Area real estate market is sufficient to appraise total just compensation due for a proposed roadway extension through an apartment building site in Campbell, l California INS 4( P CARNFG1ii RAUTOVICH & PARTNERS. INC n'NHt 1 ' Mr. Kirk Heinrichs 12 - October 15, 1997 We are pleased to have had this opportunity to be of service. Please contact us if there are any ' questions regarding this appraisal. Sincerely, ' CARNEGHI-BAUTOVICH & PARTNERS, INC. Chris Carneghi, MAI Certified General Real Estate Appraiser State of California No. AGOO1685 Jeffrey Ennght, MAI Certified General Real Estate Appraiser State of California No. AGOI 5649 ',E3FM CARNEGHI-BAUTOVICH & PARTNERS. INC. rat Y 3AV- woasve — Minos r I x CL (a a `wEEKl10[ wy Irk us y I �� y a t r cREEWAY ■ QUALIFICATIONS OF CHRIS L. CARNEGM, MAI CaliWnu Certified General Real Eststc Appraiser No. AG001685 Chris Cutegbi is the Prsidaw of Carnaghi-Basuovich & Partners, Inc., a California corporation. Following u a brief roams of his backgro and said experience. EXPERIENCE Mr. Ca a*o is an expwieocad c—kmw and appraiser in the fields of real state aad urban tcatomics. Ha his does, t kst mad fembi ty riles sad appnmmils m residential. office, itdWial, rend and hotel project. He also his extensive NCPW ce o cast rsradmi anslyss as they relate to rnmicipal fiscal impart from a land use pojeu. Mr. Carneghi is a rmcsber (MA) of the Appraisal Instinue. Attar Brachurmg with academic dwinaim from the Uttiversity of California at Berkeley w 1972. he worked for several years wish Paul Full"Im. MAI. an real aside market re smmnch with amphssie on downtown rejuvenasim edrhdies. He theme sped two yeah with Kaiser-Aams, a ttstioaal teal estate developerratt partnership. therraging nrrkel research and fi—.1 arrlysis for teur spacial projects office. Following this, be was the project economist for the City of Set Jose Economic Development sad Red-Aopmed Program. In 1977. Mr. Carteghi established the firm of Urbm Economics Corpor> eon, a real estate conwkutg farm. In 1979, he tmris Urbst Fronmca with the firm of Fullatm-Mills, a real estate appraisal farm established w 1972. The mergs re J d in Mi16Casimi&, Itc. (later MiWCarmghi-Behaovich, Inc. which became Caroegbi-Bataovich & ^artrmen, Inc. in August 19", a ,val admit appraisal sad urban economics c em,j mg cottpaty. Carneghi-Bm9ovich A Partners, Inc. has 18 teal add. appnual sad merkat search profeem—als sod —it— offs m San Frsncuco and Sin Jose. Mr. Ceres& his overall rnstagernsra rspsribdity for the firm, as wall at being the principal m charge of natty specific appraisal. markes research am —k.6 asshgrhrnerhts. In the course of his nomhal raid orate appraised work, Mr. Caroegtu his also served u as, expert worts m court. He his been q-1dmd as areal agate expert o it. Slyaior Couru of Sufi Francisco, Sun Clara, San Mateo, Morin. Coat. Costa did Aliteds C—bs did as the Federal US BarA.0i y C— tat n Oakland, Sat Francisco, San Jose, Sat Diego tend Setts Rome. He fir also hem quddsed me areal estate expert ead unified N Federal Tax Can in San Fria — sad in hearing before the Atmrican Arbitration Association. Other rated expertmca mludes teaching, speaking asd ptblications m v— fiats of real state appraisal mad rmrket reaearch which are fisted below. Mr. Carn"N his served m the baud of directon of a cosdostutieun project. lie war a c ttiltaen to the Set Jose City Council Job and Honsing Conhmitlee. which wu ..huSud with itvstigatiog the focal . err of the imbalance be wem job and b—iog in that arty, cad a catnsketn to the Cupertino City Council caaceroiag the remebilsly d high density residectW deveiopnarn m that city. He his also rude nmareru prmenatims to the rating ngm , of Stwulard rend Poor's and Moody't m coruhathon with marked mdhs concerning rsrotgage nwarare bend pro- graeis. PROFESSIONAL AFFIIJATIONS & STATE CERTIFICATION ' MAI Denigration (No. 6566) Apprawl Ieatrnte Chatrnat Ad-- Costnhittee: AIREA Chapter 11, 1987 Slate of California Certified Cxraral Real Estate Appraiser No. A0001685 ' EDUCATION ' Bachelors Degne: Urban Econontics, Unvenity of Calif.— at Berkeley, 1972 Matters Degree: ll i—s Admmtetral—, Ssn Jose Side Unrveratty, 1978 TEACHING Course: Rail Emma Appraisal (RE 3020, hathttctor Location: Golden Gate U--dy, Sat F—iaco, Spring 1989 Coarse: Topic -a w Real Estate (BA 296). Gtwm Lacturer oc lation: University of Califortia at Berkeley, Spring 1988 Castries: Real Estate sad Urban Planning (URB P 196H), hatnwtor 1 (Revised 05t96 - MISCIQCC) I QUALIFICATIONS OF JEFFREY ENRIGHT, MAI Califomia Catified Gacral Real FAW. Apprattitr No. A0015649 EXPERIENCE Partner, Carneghi-Bautovich R Partners, Inc., from 1994. Project Manager, Carneghi-Bautovich R Partners, Inc , from 1988. Carneghi-Bautovich & Partners is one of the major real estate appraisal and consultation services firms in the San Fnmcisco Bay Area. Clients include financial institutions, developers, pension (suds, corporations, law firths, government agencies, and individuals. Assignments include a broad spectrum of uses, property types, and ownership considerations. w Property types appraised by Mr. Enright include office, research dr development, industrial, warehouse, shopping center, retail, apartment, single family subdivision, mixed -use, church, school, .� vacant land, golf outuse, open space, wetlands, and public use facilities, in Santa Clara, San Mateo, Alameda, Same Cruz, and Monterey Counties. Appraiser with Hilliard Upman dt Associates, Inc. (no. Lipman Stevens Marshall Thene, Inc.), San Diego, California, from 1987-1988, -. Assignments included emphasis on office, retail, and multifamily residential properties. Properties I were appraised in San Diego and Riverside Counties, in California, and in Pin? C,,unty, Arizona. EDUCATION Bachelor of Arts, with distinction, conferred by the University of California at San Diego, in 1988 Major: Quantitative Ecorxtmics and Decision Sciences PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS MAI Designated Member of the Appraisal Imutute Member No. 10533 Certified General Real Estate Appraiser State of California (No. AGOI5649) u RELATED ACTIVITIES Article -'R&D Campus Development Gres Vertical", SFBA Focus (a publication of the Appraisal Institute's r San Francisco Bay Area Chapter), May 1997. Editor - SFBA Focus, a publication of the Appraisal Institute's San Francisco Bay Area Chapter, 1996. Yt1 Panelist -'Demonstration Appraisal Report Writing", Appraisal Institute chapter meeting, September 1996. r 1 Chairperson - Apprai col Institute seminar: Assessment and Mello -Rona Bonds, July 1995. r r� Co -Editor - SFBA Focus, a publication of the Appraisal Institute's San Francisco Bay Area Chapter, 1995. Chairperson - Appraisal Institute seminar: Assessment and Mello -Roos Bonds, April 1993. I� Article - 'The Impact of Defense Cuts on the South Bay Economy', News Eleven (a publication of the y Appraisal Institute's San Francisco Bay Area Chapter), April 1990. September 23, 1997 Gloria, I have an update on the new Pruneyard building scheduling per Ron McLester, Project Director, Hornberger + Worstell on Sept. 22 Mr. McLester said that the owner is interested in building all three projects (the hotel addition, office tower and parking structure) at the same time. There is a six month delay on receiving the steel for the project, so scheduling is "tight". He was curious whether any of the following could be started prior to issuance of a Use permit: 1) trenching and relocation of a water, sewer and sprinkler main in the parking lot outside the office tower, 2) structural plan review upon receipt of a plan check fee, 3) excavation for the office and parking structures, 4) demolition permit for the hotel portion. I he tentative schedule is as follows Mid November Issuance of Use permit Early January Submittal of complete plans, specs and calculations March Foundations begun May Steel delivered He was told that there would be a 1 week turn -around for issuance of a demolition permit for the hotel addition and 6 week turn -around for the structural and code review of the office and garage (including an original submittal and one revision to Finnigan). Finnigan can review the foundation and frame in advance of finish specifications. A quick check of the office tower shows that the two-story entry will not work: there is no way to get a one (1) hour rating from the glass wall as proposed. The rest, including the garage and hotel look like no problem (with the exception of disabled access to the interior of the garage) URBAN PLANNING DONALD J. SKINNER, A.I.C.P. and Associates 137-C Redding Ruud, Campbell, Caldornia 95(X)8. 408-377-5646 Sept. 22 1997 Gloria Sciara Project Planner Community Development Dept. 70 N. First St. Campbell, CA 95008 Dear Gloria: Thank you very much for sending us the RFP for the Pruneyard Place Expanded Initial Study. Afte- cnneulting with my colleagues at Planning Resource Associates, we have reluctantly concluded that we will not be preparing a proposal for the work outlined in the RFP. We don't feel that we can promise the City the level of professional work required within the very short time available. We are particularly concerned that the substantial unknowns associated with reports yet to be received from the developer make preparation of a realistic schedule and budget not feasible at this point. We recognize the difficulties of the very short time schedule facing the staff, and we would like to assist you. We could suggest an alternative approach if you are interested. 1 am returning your copy of the City General Plan as well as the preliminary documents on noise and traffic impacts. Thank you for making those available to us. Thanks again for sending us this RFP 1 hope that we will have an opportunity to work with you in the near future. B/e`�j wishes. ,," Donald J. Skinner, AICP Principal Associate Attachments 4- +oF �4M A. u r r CITY OF CAMPBELL Community Development Department Current Planning September 22, 1997 Mr. Gasper Schiacca Paoletti Associates, Inc. 40 Gold Street San Francisco. CA 94133 Re: Additional Noise Analysis Pruneyard Place-1875 S. Bascom Avenue Dear Mr. Schiacca, The Community Development Department has reviewed the sound measurement report dated July 21, 1997, for the above referenced project. As we discussed, additional analysis of short term and long term noise impacts of the project is needed to prepare an environmental assessment for the proposed project. Below is a listing of the additional noise analysis that is being requested: I. Projection of the increase in noise levels based on traffic levels specified in the traffic study prepared by the traffic consultant. 2. Noise levels during the various construction phases of the project, and their impacts ou the noise levels to retail, hotel customers, and residents at the Aloha Apartment complex. 3. The projected STC rating of the exterior walls of the apartment units that are adjacent to the northern property line of the Pruneyard, and the resulting interior sound levels of the apartments based on projected noise level increases. 4. Noise attenuation for the first and upper stories that would be derived with the installation of a sound wall along the northern property line adjacent to the Aloha apartments. 5. Identification and discussion of frequency and duration of single event noises such as trash collection, delivery trucks, and patron activity concentrated at the northern portion of the Pruneyard during early day time and late evening hours. 6. Identification of appropriate mitigation measures for increases in noise levels (short and long term). 70 N—th Fint Street C mpbell. Cab -ma 93006 1423 — 408 866 2140 Fax 408. 866 $381 TDD 408. 866. 2790 -& Paoletti Associates, Inc. September 22, 1997 page -2- If you would like to discuss this further or if you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at (408) 866-2143. Sincerely, Gloria Sciara Planner 11 Jeanne Shook-Arterberry, Leasing Director William Wilson Associates 1999 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 200 Campbell, CA 95008 o 9 = >s 3s _�S L fit; =.F; s s �PA 96 r j( h Z ,o � J . � � aj e•*. tb i Oic z to l a6ed 11USHOWUR)H39NHOHi OE:[GZI L661 "Ol jagop0'ALpppj Z to Z Had 1131SHOM+H39H38NHOHi OE:11:Z1 LM1 ,01 /agoloO'A2pUj CITY OF CAMPBELL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING September 11, 1997 Mr. Jack Greenspan 234 East Colorado Blvd., Suite 400 Pasadena CA 91101 Subject: Traffic Impact Analysis for the Pruneyard Tower This letter comments on the material contained in the August 21, 1997 Letter Report entitled •Pruneyard Place Traffic Access, Circulation, and Parking". They are divided into two sections; the first refers to materials in the report itself, and the second refers to additional material that is required to meet the requirements for a Traffic Impact Analysis. Comments on Material in Letter Report 1. Existing traffic volumes. No comment. 2. Signalized Bascom Driveway: Not sure why the first four parking spaces on the north - south aisle should be removed. Note thai name of restaurant is "Left of Albuquerque", not 'Out of Albuquerque". 3. CampbelUUnion Signalized Driveway: Not sure that two additional lanes on the north side of intersection are required. Particularly difficult to assess the need for these improvements without a level of service analysis. Taking space for two additional lanes will significantly affect parking layout in the area. 4. Traffit Generation, Distribution, and Assignment: The office trips need to be separated from the hotel trips, as the hotel trips have been previously been approved. Trip distribution and assignment needs to reflect numbers that were generated from City's traffic model. Distribution patterns will be forwarded to you under separate cover. 5. Existing Site Circulation: The report doesn't adequately analyze options that have been discussed. Currently, the bottleneck is the narrow, two-way section behind the Outback restaurant. A two-way road replacing the one-way soumbound road would help address this problem. Some changes in radii at the turnaround would allow the current direction of travel to remain. It is important that speed humps be placed on aisle at west end of property as it is now a straight roadway to the garage site and speeding would be a potential problem. 6. Discussion of Campisi Extension options: It appears that the most viable option is to bring in the extension at approximately the location of the northbound one-way road. We need to make sure that no other changes are necessary to accommodate the new road. Developer needs to propose how parking spaces lost would be provided. I think the number of spaces is 27 but this should be confirmed. Would they be surface spaces in Pnuteyard, garage spaces, or spaces constructed in former pooUrecreation area, or combination of the three' This decision needs to be factored into the parking analysis. Pedestrian Access to Los Gatos Creek Trail. We would like developer to pursue pedestrian connection from end of southbound driveway through apartments property with job to the west to cross abandoned pool and recreation area. This access could be accommodated probably at no cost (temporary easement) in exchange for replazing parking spaces lost (probably no more than last 2 or 3 in last carport row. This access would provide a more direct walking access between Pruneyard and office buildings to the north. Apartments would benefit by having pool and recreation center removed. This project would be done only if Campisi not done immediately. City is concerned about opening driveway at the southwest corner of existing southern tower as the conflict area `)r the intersectbn would be significantly increased. We would prefer that this area remain closed. 9. Parking Analysis. Shared parking analysis needs to be done to show that overall parking will work for Pruneyard. See table belo,x for suBgested analysis. Numbers lost should be checked against latest architectural drawings. Based on my quickie analysis, parking works Okay, but this must be demonstrated for : n',er as a whole. Not enough to show that parking area to west will satisfy office needs, as some of these spaces might be used by other businesses. 1 would use 90 % in text rather than 85% as what represents capacity. Higher numbers are generally t: ed for garages and 1 think certainly 85% is desirable 90% is something that we can live with overall. Unistail is allowable for parking garage. However, it appears that regular and compact stalls already on pavement are being retained. We would entertain unistall dimensions throughout if you want to propose it. You probably didn't do parking layout, but I note that spaces in front of buildings have only 18 handicap^ed spaces. All office buildings have a demand for delivery and service vehic!es. It appears that there are loading zones in front of Towers 1 utd 2 but there should be at least one spice in front of Tower 3 for delivery vehicles, e.g. UPS, Fed -Ex. Supply Demand Pct- Noorthwest 385 248 64.4 % West 353 312 88.4 % soudwrest 20 15 75.0% North/Central ill 105 94.6% South/Central 133 125 94.0% Northeast 139 70 50A% [East 379 360 95 0% Southeast 210 143 68.1% Totals 1730 1378 79.7 % To be Lost -394 New Office 417 New Hotel 54 New Garage 804 New Total 2140 1849 86.4% TIA Requirements 1. Description of Existing Conditions. Comment on access to Los Gatos Creek Trail and transit routes. 1 am including a route map that shows location and frequency of routes. Also should be mentioned Lhat Vasona Light Rail (scheduled date of completion 2003 but not as yet funded for co astruction) has a nearby station in downtown Campbell. 2. Scenarios. The TIA requires the following analysis of scenarios: Existing Conditions, Existing + Approved, Existing + Approved + Project, and E +A + P + Expected. For this project, we are looking at several additional scenarios in order to adequately consider impacts of light rail and Campisi Extension. Thus, we need to look at the following 1 I scenarios: 1. Existing Conditions 2. Existing + Approved: Hotel included in approved as well as hotel for Maxim site (no Campisi) and trips from San Jose approved trip inventory. 3. Existing + Project: Alt. b. + office volumes (4 scenarios) 3.1. with Campisi -- no TDM/transit 3.2. with Campisi -- with TDM/transit 3.3. without Campisi — no TDM/transit 3.4. without Campisi -- with TDM/transit 4. Combined Project (Maxim + Winchester Drive -In + Pruneyard) 4.1. with Campisi —no TDM/transit 4.2. with Campisi -- with TDMhransit 4.3. without Campisi -- no TDM/transit 4.4. without Campisi -- with TDM/transit 5. Cumulative (no Campisi) - Scenario 4.3 with 2 yr. growth rate This is a total of 1 I scenarios, which I understand is somewhat burdensome. However, the City Council indicated it is interested in the effeus of Campis and light rail. 1 want to make it as easy as possible and will supply all of the traffic volumes for each of the alternatives. 1 will put these together by next Monday and will Fed -Ex a disk with the results along with prinouts. At your request, I am forwarding a copy of the current guidelines for traffic impact analyses for the Santa Clara CMA. S. �I /e d z,r/ Peter Eakland Traffic Engineer rr Steve Piasecki, Gloria Sciara, Bill Helms PRUNEYARD DEVELOPMENT MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, September 9, 1997 2:00 P.M COUNCIL CHAMBERS ALCOVE I. OVERVIEW • Purpose of meeting • Current status of application II. _MAJOR ISSUES • Identification of major project issues • Fnvironmental assessment • Campisi extension • On -site circulation M. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT • Coordinated by City • Required supporting documentation IV. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS • Outstapding Information V. PROJECT SCHEDULE • Application process • Time Lines PRUNEYARD AP.—ICATION page -2- Item III: SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Proiect Data • Detailed project description existing parking, net parking increase. • Operational description of the proposed use. • Project phasing for construction of new structures and circulation improvements. Circulation Issue; • Analvsis of on -site circulation with an mphasis cn the westerly portion of the shopping center and identification of improvements. • An updated traffic impact analysis of the proposed office space based on current traffic counts with and without the Campisi connection and with and without the Vasona Light Rail Transit. • Analysis of cut -through traffic from Campbell Avenue to the Campisi Way extension. • Additional traffic analysis as directed by the Traffic Engineer. Campisi Wav Extension • ldentif:,:ation of alternative alignments for the Campisi Way extension. Include alternatives for parking replacement associated with impacts to the Aloha apartments. Utilities/Drainage • Existing s•otm drainage master plan for the entire center. Item IV: OUTSTANDING INFORMATION NEEDED FOR SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Campisi Extension • Provide cost estimates for the various alignments, preliminary appraisal of land acquisition (through apartments) and severance costs. Site Plan • Showing Campisi Way extension terminating into the Pruneyard with modifications to on -site circulation. Arch itecturaVElevation Details • Photo montage of office towers and garage from the Highway 17 • Sections details of the parking garage. • Detailed/colored elevations and perspectives of the parking garage including materials, colors, and landscaping, etc. • Alternatives to integrate old and new buildings. • Linkage elements to connect the parking garage, and the office towers. • Detailed information and elevations of the courtyard design ' PRUNEYARD AP,—ICATION page -3- PROJECT TIMELINES PROJECT ELEMENT PROCESS TIMELINE Environmental Assessment . Scope of Work-7'_ 9/l7 • Request for Pro 9/17 • Response to RF 9/24 • Selection of Con 9/26 • Completion of tror EA 9/26 EA Completed by Consultant 10/17 Development Review Committee Conditions of Approval -Meetings (City Staff) 10/27 Hearing Noti-e-20 day Public Hearing Notice -with 10/31 environmental declaration SARC Review Site and Architectural Review 11/13 Recc. to Planning Commission Planni ig Commission Meeting 1 I/25 City Council Hearing I/6/98 DRC Comments 1875 S. Bascom Ave: Office Tower, Parking Garage, Hotel Extension August 29, 1997 A) Office Tower 1) Major use most closely resembles a B occupancy. 2) Minimum construction type allowable for a 6-story office building is type 11 F.R. UBC T 5-B 3) Type 11 F R. construction requires a two (2) hour rating of interior bearing walls, structural frame, shaft and stairway enclosures, floors and ceilings. Exit passageways from stairways #1 & # 2 are two (2) hour construction. U13C T 6-A, 1009, 4) Structure complies with UBC Sec 403 for high rise office buildings for requirements and modifications. 5) Elevators comply with UBC 403 7, 3001. 6) Bathroom facilities comply with UPC App C 7) Provide a code analysis for the structure showing code compliance of area, occupancy separation and location. Include the square footage of each Floor and show the exit door, exit passageway, corridor, and stair width calculations UBC 1063 3. B) Parking Structure 1) Major use most closely resembles an S-4 occupancy (open parking garage). 2) Minimum type construction allowable for an open parking garage is type I or Il. UBC 311.9.3, 3) Garage complies with UBC Sec. 311 9 for openness, location and exiting 4) Garage complies with UBC T 3-H for area and height 5) Openings are protected within ten (1) feet of a propertv line UBC T 5-A. 6) Provide a code analysis for the structure showing code compliance and location. Include the square footage of each floor and show the exit door and stair width calculations. UBC 106.3.3. DRC Comments (cont) C) Pruneyard Inn Expansion 1) Use most closely resembles an R-1 occupancy 2) Minimum typ: construction allowed for this size hotel is one (1) hour UBC 310.2.2. 3) Provide one (1) hour constriction of walls and floors separating dwelling units, of condors within structure, and of the interior stairway enclosures. UBC 310.2.2, 1005, 1009. 4) Hotel complies with UBC 310 for room dimensions, light, ventilation and sanitation. 5) Openings not permitted within five (5) feet of property line. UBC T 5-A. DRC Cow iriAw August 29, 1997 1) Provide grading`and dr ge plan for Building Division review. , e� 2) Provide modified one (1) hour firewall at garage walls and ceilings. �`Lc-ci Z u N t: Y n is August 25, 1997 Mr. Steve PlaseCki Com^iunitY Development Director Clcy f Campbell 70 N. First St. Campbell, CA 95008 Re: Sound Measurements PruneYard Place Office Project 1919 S. Bascom Ave. Campbe!I, CA Dear Steve: PruneYard Associates, LLC retained Paoletti Associates, Inc. an acoustical consultants to take appropriate measurements of the sound levels and sources of nolse ^urrently existing along the entry drive adjacent to the existing apartment complex; and to project the noise levels that will be experienced after the PruneYarA Place office building Is completed Enclosed is the report on this study by Paoletti dated July 21, 1997, The report speaks for Itself and concludes noise due to traffic related to the PruneYard Is fully 20dB below the overall traffic noise levels from Freeway 17 and S. Bascom Ave. and the contribution to noise levels by the new PruneYard Place Office project will be insignificant. SI ere[ -David R. Word PruneYard Associates, L.L.C. ccGloria Sciara - City of Campbell Ron MCLester - Hornbergcr + Worstell Jeanne Shook-Arterberry - William Wilson B Associates 21 July 1997 Mr. David Word David Word & Associates 1999 South Bascom Avenue 200 Campbell CA 95008 Fax: 408-371-3831 Tel.: 408-371-4700 Subj.. Sound Measurements and Increased Traflic Noise Impact New Office Building Project, Campbell, California PA Project 9709420 Dear David On 15 and 16 July (Tuesday and Wednesday), Paoletti Associates, Inc made background noise measurements along the entry drive to the office complex at The Pruneyard S' pping Center that is next to an existing apartment building complex. The purpose was to establish the existing noise levels due to traffic to the office ;omplex A proposed new office building will add about 1/3 more office space to the existing complex. It is assumed that this will increase office parking requirements and traffic by 1/3 also. The 24-hour measurement conforms to the California Model Noise Element metric for determining environmental noise conditions, the Day Night Level (DNL or L„s) See the Appendix to this letter for further explanation The office traffic is only one source of environmental noise in the area Other sources of environmental noise include traffic from the following l7 Shopping Center n Hotel Highway 17 (west of the apartments) O South Bascom Avenue (east of the apartments) The attached Figure 1 shows the measured, typical, mid -afternoon noise levels due to all sources including Freeway and South Bascom Avenue traffic These levels were mad- using spot measurements within a 2-hour period The background noise level from all traffic in or near The Pruneyard Shopping Center ranged from 60 dBA to 80 dBA during the mid afternoon. The higher levels closer to the Freeway and South Bascom Avenue were expected and show that the environmental noise at the Apartment buildings is predominately from South Bascom Avenue traffic and not the Shopping Center/Office traffic. Shopping Center/Office traffic 1999 S. BASCOM AVE. S 97-20/UP 97-11 8 OF 9 CITY OF CAMPBELL PLAN. 11/99 Mr. David Word David Word & Associates 21 July 1997 Page 2 noise was fully 20 dB lower than the noise from South Bascom Avenue. Interestingly, the loudest Shopping Center/Office noise was measured around 1 00 P M. and not 5 00 P.M. To do the DNL measurement, a calibrated sound levci meter was placed in the hedge at the edge of the driveway (along the property line) along the center of the Middle Apartment Building. Since a sound level meter (using the DNL metric) does not discriminate among noise sources, we selected the measurement site to be about equidistant from Highway 17 and South Bascom Ave me to reduce the influences of these high noise sources. The meter was programmed to integrate and record the level of all noise in one -hour intervals over a 24-hour period. The 24- hour measurement (Ls 2j represents the average level of all noise sources at the property line of the existing apartment complex for 24 hours, technically, the equivalent constant energy level due to all noise for a day. To this a 10 dB penalty is added to the nighttime hour levels to obtain the final day -night level (DNL). This level was DNL = 62.4 dBA Figure 2 shows the hour by hour noise levels. When the daytime hour noise levels are increased by 3 dB to represent a doubling of all traffic (including Freeway and South Bascom Avenue) the DNL = 63.8. Of this, only a small percentage is noise from Shopping Center/Office traffic. (The actual office complex traffic increase is only 1/3 ) The California Community Model Noise Element requires no mitigation of environmental noise for housing when the noise is less than 65.0 dBA For noise zones of 65 to 70 dBA, mitigation is required for outdoor living areas. Mitigation for outdoor living areas usually is in the form of a screen wall, the apartments in question already have such a screen in place SUMMARY The background noise level front all sources was measu. ed at the apartment building property along The Pruneyard Shopping Ceal.r This localiun waa equidistant from the Freeway and South Bascom Avenue The resultin; Day Night L : from existing traffic and from future estimated !rafTic was less than DNL = 65 dBA Spo, .,oise meal wever, s show that daytime noise levels near the apartment ranged from 60 dE .j 80 dB However, the higher levels were due solely to the noise of the Freeway and South Bascom Avenue The traffic due to the Shopping Center/Office Complex was fully 20 dB below the over traffic noise levels With such low office traffic noise levels, the contribution to the overall nuise level would be insignificant. Mr. David Word David Word & Associates 21 July 1997 Page 3 Sincerely, PAOL SSO ATE NC Room Gasper J. Sciacca, AIA Encl. Fig. I Showing Daytime noise levels Fig. 2. Measured DNL noise levels and projected future DNL noise levels. Appendix. Acoustical Terms and Procedures xi JOBlLFF9rXX.V97W4A'A11111)F IWI c/l�vRE � � 1 F1V - -o rn i z rn L I 1 ( I o N Z i � O Z rn ,9P94 TN E/V'T -70 /N I � 0 n l � E.rl ST/Mco O /SE' Let C- L S a�f N/CoMW I¢ Y 7o �� Gv I 3,9S C o TD TiyE Ef}$� 0 6L/Nb I¢ T,Qr9Fi�i� cam/ L. uE Na FFEc7- o THESE L. 6 v 4- I dB Calculations - b Toe] . Lewitz, P.E. FIGURE 2 07-17-1997 14:18:25 Leq(24), Ldn, CNEL Day Hours (no weighting) 0700 - 60.0 dBA 0800 = 61.5 dBA 0900 = 59.0 dBA 1000 - 59.5 dBA 1100 = 62.5 dBA 1200 = 62.0 dBA 1300 - 62.5 dBA 1400 = 58.5 dBA 1500 = 59.5 dBA 1600 = 61.0 dBA 1700 = 59.5 dBA 1800 = 57.5 dBA Evening Hours (no weighting for Ldn, +5 dBA for CNEL) 1900 = 56.5 dBA 2000 = 59.0 dBA 2100 = 58.0 dBA Night Hours (+10 dBA weighting) 2200 = 57.5 dBA 2300 = 58.5 dBA 2400 = 52.5 dBA 0100 - 47.5 dBA 0200 = 47.5 dBA 0300 = 48.0 dBA 0400 = 53.0 dBA 0500 = 56.5 dBA 0600 = 55.5 dBA Leq(24) = 58.8 dBA ::: Ld = 60.1 dBA: Ln = 54.6 dBA --- Ldn = 62.4 dBA Ld - 60.5 dBA: Le = 58.0 dBA: Ln = 54.6 dBA .-- CNEL = 62.8 dBA Leq(24), Ldn, CNEL Day Hours (no weighting) 0700 - 63.0 dBA 0800 = 64.5 dBA 0900 - 62.0 dBA 1000 - 62.5 dBA 1100 - 65.5 dBA 1200 = 65.0 dBA 1300 - 65.5 dBA 1400 = 61.5 dBA 1500 = 62.5 dBA 1600 - 64.0 dBA 1700 = 62.5 dBA 1800 = 60.5 dBA Evening Hours (no weighting for Ldn, +5 dBA for CNEL) 1900 - 59.0 dBA 2000 = 62.0 dBA 2100 = 61.0 dBA Night Hours (+10 dBA weighting) 2200 - 57.5 dBA 2300 = 58.5 dBA 2400 = 52.5 dBA 0100 = 47.5 dBA 0200 = 47.5 dBA 0300 = 48.0 dBA 0400 - 53.0 dPA 0500 - 56.5 dBA 0600 = 55.5 dBA Leq(24) = 61.4 dBA :.. Id = 63.1 dBA: Ln = 54.6 dBA --- Ldn - 63.8 dBA Ld - 63.5 dBA: Le = 60.8 dBA: Ln = 54.6 dBA --- CNEL = 64.3 dBA NEW OFFICE BUILDING PROJLCT, CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA, PA 97094 APPENDIX "A" WEIGHTING SCALE is a standardized decibel scale that has a weighting network that selectively discriminates against low and high frequencies approximating the frequency response of the human ear All sound pressure levels in this report are "A" weighted unless otherwise indicated AMBIENT NOISE or BACKGROUND NOISE is the sound pressure associatdd with a given environment It is a composite of sounds from near and far DECIBEL or properly DECIBEL SCALE is a scale to measure sound level pressure (or other quality of interest) that is defined as 20 times the logarithm of the ratio between the sound level pressure (or other quality) to a standard reference level I i,c standard reference in the U S. is 0 decibels equals a pressure of 0 0002 Microbar. The abbreviation for decibel is dB INTEGRATED or EQUIVALENT SOUND LEVEL is "A" weighted equivalent continuous sound exposure level for a defined period of time This is abbreviated LW,.,, SOUND LEVEL METER is an instrument to measure sound pressure in dB Various features are incorporated into the instrument to select specific Sound frequency bands, integrate pressure over time and display minimum, mean, and peak levels These are necessary because sowed is highly dynamic and is constantly changing x:1 roorvtwrx=9row1"11u ra ins y To: City Clerk Please roll nd receipt Ad! for the follo. . tg monies. _ 1. 15�1'zl: CA. 1+ acres - General Plan f medment $4,425 Zone Change 1A25 Planned Development Pe nit /A25 FOR Review /A25 B. 0.1 acre General Plan Amedment 3=5 Zane Change 3= Planned Development Permit 3= FIR Review 3�75 11. Minor, A. Subdivision Map (S+Iota) 3225 Site and ArcMtectunl 10+ K S.F. Z130 Tentative Parcal Map (adds) Z150 B. Site and Architectural 0-10 K S.F. 11550 Variance (Non-residential) 1,550 Text Amendments 1,550 Use Permit III. MisceljIpCGyL A. Variance (Residentia" 960 Modifications of Approval 96) Modification PD Permit %0 Reinstatements 960 Revised Development !_chedule %0 Fxtenstons of Time 960 B. Lot line Adjustments 500 Sue and Architectural (Res.) (Each House) 120 Signs (Each Sign) ]2D Fence Exception 120 Promotional Events 120 C. Appeals 0 Dowrtown Development Penrut 0 Historic Preservation Zone, Use Pemut, HP Permit 0 IV. Other; Maps 625 General Plan Text I11.00 Zoning Ordinance Zt Copies (per Page) 1 Refundable Deposit - Account 2203 Fire Department Revkw - Account 01.30 -Uri Architectural Approval 10 Project Plan Review YA Subdivision ION 10 perlot/tact Park Impact Fee - Account 295535.1920 RECEIVED For City Clerk only: Rswtipt C- /"/ AUG 2 1 iS9i Amos - CITY CLERK'S OFFICF Exception for Major pro": It is anticipated that the application processing coats of selected rnejor projects will significantly exerted the above fees. In these ease, the Community Development Director may collect a deposit and charge actual time spent to process the application based upon current hourly rates. Note AdoTlsd by Resolution No. 8641 by City Coundl, City of Campbell, 6/20/95 le No Development Application pltnnina Dapartment 70 Wnh Fint Strart, C+epssl. =riff n. 95008 (400) US-21/0 APN& 288-04-017/Parcel i , DA7EI]1[ID Za41C C 2 COIJIA.'9 BALPL: -C„mmc rc i:iI PINOVE YA133tE t 1995 South Bascom Ave 7YPEOFAFFLICAiICIM Use permit (Hotel expansion) APiIC-A 1`. PrunesYard and Asc ri^tee tl['y111 in., Wi l� .1�..,,.; ... o� M+n nts ADCRM 1999 South Bascom Ave, Suite 200 7ELn}jONE(409 371-4700 QIY/SFA7E Campbell, CA Ma 95008 pltoi, MU,Vfhn Prunelfard Associates LU,, ADUM 1999 South Bascom Ave Suite 2n0 44O 3✓� 71-44700 QIY/STATF. Campbell, CA _ M! 95008 Attad. a separate sheet listing the names and addresses of othem you wish to receive copies of staff reports and agendes. AFFIDA vIT/ SIGN ATURE(S): The unprnigned pemonls), having an intarost in tha abov"waibed property, hereby make this application in accordance with the provision:, or the Campbell Municipal Code; and, hereby certify, thnr the Womation given herein is true and correct to the best of my/our knowledge and belief. Ap S re Date perry 00nVKmature I Date / ,t [lions NOTE: Staff is required by State Law to no, applicants ofeccorn tcncsa o their appYcatiom within 30 days. Only those applications which are found complete will be placed the Planning Commission Agends. PC Meeting: Completeness Latter Sent: 12C Action: 300 Foot Notices Me lied; CC Meeting: _ Prmb Notice Published: CC Action: _ Notice of Prop/Public Review: Fee Paid: Notice of Determination: Receipt No: Rv1d.7/31/91 Please send copies of staff repons and agendas to: Charles Missler 170 Maiden Lane San Francisco, CA 94108 Ron Mc Lester 170 Maiden Lane San Francisco, CA 94108 David Word 1999 South Rascom Ave. Suite 200 Campbell, CA 95008 rRd'I • moetgDEROen • W0R511!— + � . -" ` - - - .1— 1-- 1 i— NCL Site & Architectural Review Permit SuppkmenW App1i=N4,, -- PURPOSE The Site and Architrtiturai Review Ara is intended to promote orderly developmert; to arthi tea the character, •ebWly, and into" no mghborhoods and zoning dWrias; tD secure the rural purpose of the Ciys 2oninr, Ordli arc, and General plan, and to w—re high quanty .rehitectural design tad optimum site design through the architectural review ptorae. FROCESS Prt-w,�elreahon Review: it is rcmmrtended that the appllnnt snake an appointment with a pisnrsr prior to sub.-dttmg an epplieantln to discuss tru pmrz.,nary design of the project. This will help the applicant determine If the pr.paaal is -,on, with a Airrg review standards and cadinarm requiremer" tiLne of ,pJ" m The completed applicatro. must be filed with the Planning Dap.rrm.rt .lens w-rh the sppmpriste fa and all required data. The staff piaroer who is duty will give the eppl:catian and data a car nu+ry review fa mmpleteneas. The spplicatNn cannot be accepted if the submittal is inemnpiete. After the project has been assigned br a planar, it will be _wad in neona deoR for eomplowsaw. A letter 'Wing if the application is complete or if Additional kJorrutlon to nq.b.d will Is. s..t W the spyllu,d wItm. 30 days aher teoelpt of the application. E,,,,k2 meniel Lgxj w: Nearly all Site and Architectural Review —..*to are orqulrcd tc have sn a v, .zonal .ovrnato dRerntlne if it wll: be necessary to prepare ar. Environmental impact Report or a Negative Dsciaratitm. �,Qylira hot. Rrvlxw: The Planning Staff, the Site and Archniectural Review Committee, end the Planning Commusiom will maiden the following in the review of Site .n>,i A,chit.0.1e1 R.Aew appl:unoa: 1. TmfHc safety, cuegation, end our A-110100: 2. lardaapbv and 3. Building and sue layout. Staff Review: The Planning Staff will evaluate the request by , ,,!w rig an i.w.auption of the ate' and Considering the proposal La relation to adjoining structures. Staff Will prepare a writ... reyan for the Pla i., C.mousafoa which will analyze the development proposal and provide staff reoommervlWena A copy of tW. esPrt will W sent to the applicant. 5jiLarid Architecttiml Rrvlrww Committee fSARO: Prior to the planning cemmWlon meeting your appiiotim will be renewed by SARL the Committee reviews Iha spout -her' for site layout and building design and than forwards a r.wsuurrerd.t;w W the f'lnuung Commtsstoa Pr/rlte Neelre: At Iran 10 days prior to the public hearing, property owners within 300 feet of the subjed property will be notified by mail of the herring In addiuen, a -seise of the public hearing will be published in the Campbell Express. rlanni0f cam uAma u: The planning Comm"o, ig requited to review and approve detailed -, building, -A lar i—pc plane. Staff will present so 0-1 repo" atd recommendation for the Prof , , I 'i , Title pr=iieOon will be folluw.d by I.ssLr.any from the Oppllasnt W then try any interested persons who may wish to mmtant m the spplieation. The planting Cowmis. may than class the public hearing and max. a decision asp-vIr$ as Conditionally approving the request, denying the roqueat, or poorpotwng the decision to a later date. Unlru an appeal is filed. the Planning Commission's decision is A-1. City Council: Site and ArchRodural Review Applications One not required to go talon the City Council, unless the Planning Commission's decision is appealed within ten ralendu days. Project Summary INFORMATION TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT Zoning C General Plan Designation: t rc' 1 Proposwuse. Hotel expansion Existing Use: lotel Gross Fbot Area, Floor Area Ratio: — No. of Stones: 3 Net Lot Siu: Lot Coverage: _. LandacaprCove,eB Surrounding Uses: North' Apartments East: x,wd 711 'rt Parking 5pacas Mveded: i on 'ter 1 l e Park ing/cnmmerc taI Pavement Coverage. -- South; Retail center West: Office tower sae- rey.-.10 e109 F.o� 1. sde & Ardikaenl aeoire AltedTeet A PRUNEYARD PLACE & INN P'g" PROJECT SUMMARY AIMMOrs Parcel Number. _____ 28F _ 04 - 01 • 23 1.972.002 Gross sq. ft. (Pnperty a curter line of (no) f.186.705 Net sq. ft. ullli Sq. ft. Percent % Building Coverage (indYde randl�p9mmu) 435.534 37% Landscape Coverage 177,300 15 g Paving Coverage _573.87f 48% —� Floor A_rgaRatio. Total building sq. it. divided by net lot size 0 63 AdAUM Land ILU Zonine North RF$IDENTIAL R South REI.AIL / RCS. C 2 Fist RETAIL C.2 West FREEWAY NA Parkine Standard 2.146 Compact Ng_ Handicap _ 40 TOTAL 2 186 Restaurant and e5fimbl+ fees Seating Count 1 930 Roldeoltal Proi= Unit Type A B C Living Area NA Garage Area NA Total Area No. of of Bedrooms �tl A Number of Units NA a..a $/DRa rRp'I ,rgRIVpEROeR WOR3TELL +-5 9BP t53C•r•`�� 3.32 aJ:J r•J% J"r r I- NOt Site & Architectural Review Permit Suppl --W App1kdi- PURPOSE nut She and Architectural Review Area Is intended to promote orderly development; to enhance the eharacier, etabUlty, aid into" d neighborhoods and zoning districts; io areum thr gsnveat prpose of the Guys Zoning Ordinance and General PLn, anduto assure high quality arelut-tural design sold optimum site design through the architectural review process. PROCESS Pre-Amulration Review: It is recommended that the applicant make an appointment with is planner prior to submitting an application to discuss the preliminary design of the project. This will help the applicant determine if the peeposd la aes.tssent with sai.ting revfrw standards and of inane requhmteda. Flue of Application, The completed application mutt be filed with the Planning Dept --ant along with the appropriate fee and all required data. The staff planner who Is on duty will give the application and data a mrsnry review for completeness. The sppGcatlon cannot be accepted if the submittal Is incomplete. Ater the project lee been assigned to a plainer, it will be se.iew.d in more dtad for eomplanenesa. A lettsr stating If the appilation is complete or if additional infornullon is ",bed will he sent to the appll area within 30 days aver netipt of the application. pnyit2iiMSAtal Review: Nearly all Site and Architectural Revlsw requests on required to hove an environmental assessment to determine if It will be necessary to prepare an Environmental Impact Report or a Negative Deelantion. �poliration Rrvlew: The Planning Staff, the Site and Architectural Review Committee, and the Planning Commission will consitty the following in the review of Site and Ao loiteetunt Review appilanoni: I. Traffic safety, cortgent on, and site circulatlort 2. IAndecaptng: and 3. Building and site layout. Staff Review: The Planning Staff will evaluate the request by wnducttng an :nvwtigatlon of the ohs earl considering the proposal M relation to adjoining struetura. Stuff will prepare a written report for the 111sn.rng Commission which will analyze the development proposal and provide staff r. _nd.u.- A ropy of this report will be sent w the applicant. Sian Architectural Review Committee ISARCI: prim to the planning Commualon Meeting your application will he reviewed by SARC. The Communes review the appUatim for site layo.it and budding design and then forwards a reoouunerd awn w the Plarming Commission rN.blir Notice- Al least 10 days price be the public Fearing, property owners within 300 feet of the subject property will be notified by mail of the hearing_ In addition, a netiw of the public hearing will be published in the Campbell Eaprsas. Planning Commission Meedns: The Planning Commission is required to review and approve detailed site, bulldin& and landscape plans. Sta" will prasant an osal report and reeommendatinn for the prmpossd pro* This presentation will be followed by laatmmny tom tha applicant aid than by any iatonated persons who may wish to oamment CO the appliestion. The flannlwg Commission may asset doss the public hearing and mate a decision approving or conditionally approving the req.m. drrtying the ngoaen, or yeatporting the derision to a later date. Unless an appeal is filed, the plannloR Commission's decision is final. QX Council: Site and Architectural Review applications are no required to go before the City Council, unless the Planning Co ,mission's decision It appealed within ten calendar days. Project Summary INFORMATION TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT Zoning C-10 General Plan Designation: comme rc i a l Proposed Use: Lrsing garage/office towers ExistingUse: Parkins Gross Flom Area:0-flee l25i184/Garage 246,556FIoorArea Ratio, Gasea�e 3 stories No. of stortu: Net Lot Stu: Parking Spaces Provided: 809 st-alls Tower 6 stories Lot Coverage: —. LandiarspF Coverage: Pavement Coverage: Surrounding Uses: North: Parking South: Parking/office tower Fiat: Retail Shopping West: Parking and office tower atM.:l1; e2 PREi :nORr16ERisER ��OF STE�� .'s gas 638, 1557.06-15 09 gY MV-, F�o Site b Ardtlfeavrel Reoleu Pere 1 Sasplee,ewesl APjt'e Ii ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Ym No 1. Change in existing features of any lakes, hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours. __ 2 Change in smic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. x 3. Mange in pattern, scale or character of the general area surrounding the project. X 4. Significant amounts of solid weute or Utter. x 5. Change In dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. `x c Change in lake, strearn or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. _ x 7. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. x S. Proposed development is on a filled site or on a slope of 10 percent or more. x 9. Use of and/or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammables or expioarves. 10. Substantial change in the demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, etc). —� " 11. Substantial increase in the demand for fossil fuel consumption (elactriclty, oil, natural gas, etc.). _X 12 Relationship to larger project or scries of projrxts. X 13. Additional traffic generation or parking demand. Dlstuss below all of the above items checked yes, (Attach additional sheets as necessary) None 14. Describe the project site as it exists, include information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, hblorluil or scenic aspens. Describe Any existing structuttM on the site. the rorne, of B An shoDP ing center tovertn to acres oc u goo •u� ��• o-- --- -- -- -- cnd entered around lush, landscaped grounds and contains [ e c arm a 70 s, when the sho 1n center vas construcrea. ne ,,,.- •�..r •^••- - mark project is the Pruneyar inn, a -room t ree story or; ocate a e nor end. 13. Describe surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals, and any cultural, historicrl or scenic Aspects. Indicate the intercity of lard use and the sale of development (height, frunta I tbarks etc.) The north end of the property leads to the Los Gatos trails as well as Me a three-story apartment comp ex. a east and south are general commercial Rnd. 711 /e. 'RGI.1 rC�DlwOln • l.Ip13TCLL Attachment C West Vdky Sanitation District 4 Acknotuiedgement NOTICE TO APPT.ICANTS RBGARDING SFFBCI OF WASTE WATER ntEATMVT CAPACITY ON LAND DEVMDPMWT APPROVAL PURSUANT TO DEViLOPMENT OF APN. 288-04-12 please take notice that no vested right to a building permit Shall accrue as the result of the granting of any land development approvals and applications. Pursuant to the adoption of Ordinance 9-OAS by West valley Sanitation District 4, the agency providing the above described parcels) with sewer service, if the District's Manager and Engineer makes a determination that the issuance of a sewer connection permit to a building, or proposed building, on the above described property, will, in his opinion, cause the District to exceed its ability to treat adequately the waste water that would result from the issuance of such connection permit, then'said permit may not be issued, and, hence, no building permit tray be issued by this agent'. If the sewer connection permit is issued, it may contain substantive conditions designed to decrease the waste water associated with any land use approval. 1 i �pWt FDGfi rrNr I By siS,jnS below, the applicant admwledges, at the'itlme of application, that he/she fully undmtands the above. Address of Proposed Developytfrtt i li / Applicarut's Signature Dune Origt�nat to SYest Valley Sanitation District No. 4 1 100 Fast Sunnyosks Avenue, Campbell, CA 9eNs Copies to: File i Applicant c X. A -n /V Please send copies of staff reports and agendas to: Charles Missler 170 Maiden Lane San Francisco, CA 94108 Ron Mc Lester 170 Maiden Lane San Francisco, CA 94108 David Word 1999 South Bascom Ave. Suite 200 Campbell, CA 95008 nnrrrarti.eesoen won5re�� +=e lea ese' •_�. ••'�-_� ••� _• ••,.� .•_ .. Development Application Plannlrrj ORWitmenl i0 Neth Fin1 Sim", C.MpNil, Calf(enb 9500a 11011 a64U6a 7-1-Q7 AVNW. 288-04-12/ 288-04-14/ Parcel 2 2101,114a C- 0 CENRALPLAN. L __, _ , ., — PRj)pfLYAIl7tPSLs 1999 South Bascom Ave TfMC1FAPPlXAT7041Sl: S ectal develo ment e m Prunevarg Place office Cover. - Managing agents ATTAJ: NC Prunevard Assoc ADDREM 1999 South Bascom Ave. Suite 200 'j�j})( E r404 371-4700 95008 C[IY/ST'ATT_' PiK)PERYOyVNIt Pruneyard Associates LLC tip 1999 South Bascom Ave Suite 200 TEZ{;pNE (4X 371-4700 QIY/STATE P Cam bell, CA : Y�45008 Attach a separate sheet listing the names and addresses of others you wish to receive copies of staff reports and agendas. AFFIDAVIT/SiGNATURE(S): The undersigned ptso enls), having an intermt in the above -described P roP hereby mthi ake s application in accordance with the provisions of the Campbell Municipal Code; and, hereby c Mfy that the information given herein is true and correct to tthee best of my/our knowledge and - belief a rlrant-s SRnature D., Pro tyOwneYc �mcaj of S' IfM ADP- ^p/�g� `4��' I 30 NOTE: Staff isred tons which are found State Law to comp kte wap till be placed on the Planning Commission gads a mp days. Only PP OFFICE USE ONLY FAction: Completeness Letter Sent: 300 Foot Notices Mailed: - Press Nutice Published: Notice of Prep/Public Review: Notice of Determiru ton: lKeipt No: ltvad.7/31/92 PROFI 11t0R.DER6CR wGR61E— ` FII2 .0 Site & Architectural Review Permit Supp1nnmtd,Vpho26 l PURPOSE Tl. Site sad Axhitw-t.ral Review Area Is intended to promote orderly development; to enhance the character, sesbuley, and integrity of neighb-hood, and sorting di—kn; to Secure the g�netal purpost of the Cleys Zoning Ordinance and General Plan, and a assert high'Jeaaty uchiNct-el design and optimum site design through the architectural review process. PROCESS Pre-Apudiration Review: It is recommended that the applicant make an appointment with a planner prior to aub"M% en application to discuss the preliminary destg n of the projart. Title will help the applicant determine If the pmpaesl is e-t.utent with eai.ting review Standards and ordinude requ nerre ts. Fline of Aooiicarbn' The completed application rust be filed with the planning Depsrtm.nt along —1, the appropriate fee and all required data. The Staff planner who Is on duty will give the appl!cation and data. a curvwy miew for completeness. The appGcatlon cannot be accepted If the submittal is inoomplate. After the project has been assigned to a planner, it will be -.],caved in m-e dean for completeness. A teeter stating if the application is complete or if additional information is -yuir.d will be s.nt to the appll—d within 30 days aner receipt Of the appilcadon. pee r2nmental Review: Nearly all Site and Architectural Review requests are required to hev. an a mnmenla! aasstsrnew to determine it it will be necessary to prepare an Environmental Impact Report or a Negative DedaretiM AooliQijon Review: The Planning Staff, the Site and Architectural Review Committee, and the Planning Commission will consider the follosving in the review of Site and Arclih d.ra1 Review appticanont Project Summary Troffk Safety, mngdtion, st,d site circulatuire IandeapbW and Building and site layout. Staff Revinv: The Planning Staff will evaluate the request by woducting an iovesugatlun of the site and considering the proposal in mission to adjoining structures. Staff will prepare written -pen for the Planning Comouesion which will analyse the development proposal and provide staff rrsomvnerdatlons A copy of this repen will be sent to the applicant. @itC and AmHtscluml Revlew Committee (SARO: Prior to the planning Cammwlon meeting your application will be reviewed by SARC. The Comm4ttee miews the application for site layout and building design and then forwards a rewuunend.iwn ate the pluming ComausaoR lh,klk J.jowee AS I.,n 10 days prior to the public hiring, property owners within 300 feet of the Subject property will be notitied by trail of the hearing, in addition, a cacti- of cite public hearing will be published In the Campbell E"s. j'tannine Commission Meeting. The Aannlug Commission is required to review and approve detailed site, building, and iandacape plans. Scats will present an ocal report and neomenan cation for the proposed project. This presentation will be folknved by tesiunny from the applicant W than by any interetted persons who may wish to comment can the eppli-sien. Th. Planning -..L iQn may than dose the public hearing end auks a decision approving or contditbnall) approving -iro the requeet, Amying the request, a pning the decision to a later date. Unless an appeal 1s Iiiled, the Planning Commission's decision is final. CiIy Councr.1: Site and Architecture] Review applications are not required to go before the City Council, vnless the Planning Come,ieeion'a decision Is appealed within ten calendar days. INFORMATION TO BE flLLEU OUT gY APPLICANT Zoning: C-20 General Plan Designation: lomme r i i a t PropoSed Use: Parkina¢araye/office towers/office towers Existing Use: Pa rk Inc Gro,Sploor/UES;Office 125,184/Garage 246,556EloorArea Ratio: CGaara e J stories No. ofStor�ls: Net Lot Siu: Parking SpactnProvided: 809 stalls Tower 6 stories Lot Coverage: _. I.Andwspr Coverage Pavement Coverage: _ Surrounding Uses: North: Parking South: Parkin/office tower East: Retail Shopping West: Parking and office tower Rvnd.7/I;a! Alt*mW D riMivn D4rlorwre Fonw Ayr1 TO 111 PHI= OUT BY APPLICANT w LoNiRl6VNONS TOTALING SM HAVE NOT BEEN MADE, CHSM K5Z AND SIGN EELOW IN SECTION M. 11. TO' C'gIZM ONLY IFCON1RlBUllLNS TOTALING SM OR MORE HAVE BEEN MADE. NAME: ADDRESS: TF]JU N''E NO: LIST COA04MON MEMBERS) TO WHOM YOU AND/OR YOUR AGENT MADE CAMPAIGN CONTRMMONS TOTALING SM OR MORE, AND THE [)ATM OF THOSE CONTRMLMONS. NAM& CONTRIBUTOR Uf o*w Urn YommN DATE (SY. AMOUNT W. NAME: CONTRIBUTOR: DATE (S): AMOUNT (S): NAME: CONTRIBUTOR: DATE (A: (If odw em your@" AMOUNT (5): Ill. SIGNATURE , Rw1. MIMI At this point in the meeting, Councilmember Dean did not participate in the discussion due to a conflict of interest regarding the Pruneyard project. b. Prumeyard: David Word, William Wilson Associates, presented an overview of the proposed development at the Pruneyard to include expansion of the Pnmeyard Inn to add 54 rooms, a 120,000 square foot story office building, and a parking structure. Following the presentation, City Councilmembers and Planning Commissioners were given an opportunity to ask questions and discuss pertinent issues including traffic impacts and parking. Concerns regarding safety issues associated with the parking structure were also discussed. Oral Requests There were no Oral Requests. Mayor Conant adjourned the meeting at 8:15 p.m. APPROVED: Barbara D. Conant, Mayor Arne Bybee, City Clerk Wastes of 8/4199 City Council study Seuion CITY Campbell,City of Street, COUNCILMIN MINUTES California Crry COUNCEL Sot IDY SESSION MONDAY AUG1 4 1997 - 6:00 P.M. CANMELL C011B1IC t Y CENTER 1 W CAMPBELL AV�LIUE -ROOM 33B Note: This Study Session was duly noticed pursuant to open meeting requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act (G.C. Section 54956). CALL TO ORDER The City Council of the City of Campbell convened this day in a Study Session &c the Campbell Community Center, Room 33B to review the Maxim and Pnmeyard development proposals. Present: Councilmembers: Dougherty, Watson, Dean, Futtado, Conant Absent : Councilmembers: None Introduction (City Staff) Staff present included: Bernie Strojny, City Manager; Anne Bybee, City Clerk; Bill Seligman, City Attorney; Steve Piasecki, Community Development Director; Tim Haley, Associate Planner; Bob Kass, Public Works Director; Bill Helms, Environmental Program Manager; Peter Eakland, Traffic Engineer; Kirk Heinrichs, Redevelopment Manager and Geoff Bradley, Redevelopment Coordinator. Planning Commission Members present included: Bud Attie, Brad Jones, Dennis Lowe, Jars Meyer -Kennedy, and Mel Lindstrom. 2. Project Presentations (Applicants) Community Development Director Piasecki stated that the purpose of the study session was to hear presentations from Maxim and Pruneyard regarding their proposed developments and identify any major issues or concerns that the City Council would like to see addressed as their applications proceed. a. Maxim Proposal: Dennis Randall, Director of Commercial Real Estate, Maxim Property Management, presented an overview of the proposed development to include a 170 room "suites" hotel, a 160,000 square foot, five story office building, and three parking structures. Following the presentation, City Councilmembers and Planing Commissioners were given an opportunity to ask questions and discuss pertittent Issues including traffic impacts, parking, hotel size, building mass, and landscaping. Cif ,:�ouncil CATEGORY: Study Session Report MEETING DATE: August 4, 1997 TITLE Maxim Development and Pruneyard Expansion RECOMMENDATION Hear the presentations from representatives of Maxim and the Pruneyard and identify any major issues or concerns that you would like to see addressed as these applications proceed. BACKGROUND Staff has received two pre -applications for developments it the PnneyardlCreeksde area that propose multi- story office buildings, one hotel and a hotel erasion and parking garages. Both applicants have held discussions with staff during the past year as they explored their Mal development concept end prepared to present the applications to the City The applicants were advised that staff would like to present these applications to the City Council during the pre -application phase to identify any major issues or concerns that should be addressed and to inform the Council ahead of the formal application filing. The following section summarizes these two developments. ANALYSIS Maxim The Maxim site consists of approximately 5.7 acres located across from the Apple Computer buildings between Crseksde Way and Highway 17, south of Hamilton Avenue. The site is zoned Planned Development and was planned to accommodate a 250 room hotel in 1985 when the Prometheus office buildings (asrandy occupied by Apple Conputer) and related parking facilities were approved. The applicam proposes to use the perking garages and office building to screen visibility of the adjacent PG&E substation. The 5.7 we site is currently developed with a surface parking lot used to support the 5 story office buildings located across Creekside Way. The site is adjacent to the Vasona CoMdor light rail station. The applicant proposes to build the followig development: Acres: 5.7 (one 4.7 acre site north of the PG&E substation and a 1.0 acre site located east of the substation) Uses: 170 room "tufts" hotel consisting of approximately 96,000 square feet and up to 6 stories 160,000 square foot 5-story office building Three parting structures ranging from 3.6 stories floor area ratio: 1:1 • approxirtalety 1 square foot of floor am :1 square foot of prOM eta (not including the parking structures) City Council Study Session — August 4, 1997 Maxim Development and Pruneyard Expansion Page 2 Pruneyard William Wilson Associates, owners of the Pruneyard, have been considering development of a new office building and expansion of the Pruneyard Inn for over a year. Their proposal will accommodate an existing tenant (CmPuware) by construct'ig a 120,000 square foot. 6 story office building located just west of and between the two existing office towers and a 3 level parking structure located in the northwest corner of the site. They intend to create a parking plaza between the three office buildings and architecturally Ink the new office building with the existing development. In addition to the office component. May propose to expand the Pruneyard Inn by 54 rooms, from 118 rooms to 172 rooms. The hotel expansion will occur within the existing retail center building footprint. They propose to phase the construction to build the parking garage first, to avoid Significant parking disruption. The applicant proposes o the following development Acres: 27.2 Uses add 54 moms to the Pruneyard Inn (from 118 to 172 rooms) the hotel expansion will occupy existahg retail space 120,000 square foot 6 story office buildirg one parking structure equaling 3 stories floor area ratio: 6 1.0 = approximately 6/10 square foot of floor area per 1 square foot of Parcel area (not including the parking structures) Traffic Both developments have been preliminarily reviewed in terns of traffic and appear to be able to work with some lots! traffic mitigation expected. Staff is exploring a mitigation fee to enable the City to conduct traffic improvements in the general area skmilar to the fee imposed on the developments along Harmon Avenue. The proximity of both sites to the Vasona Condor light rail station should help to relieve some of the traffic npa.'ts. STUDY SESSION FORMAT The stilly session agenda includes an introduction by srxfr and then a brief presenrath from the Project applim - to discuss the objectives and market conditions that ied to the types of development being proposed. In the now kit". the City Coundl and Planning Commission will be hearing lh es, applications in public hearings at which time the Council and Commission will have the benefit of ill the reports and exhibit plus public input. Consequently. it Is important to limit your comments and observations it this tFne, to general topics without atempting to fully review the project. For instance. the Council may have a general concern about trafic and want to ensure that it is fully o vered in the application review or a o im m abort project messing relative to surrounding developments and ask that the exhibits illustrate numerous perspectives of the project sites. Hh:+hever. the Council should not focus on specific cordittws of approval at this time. Members of the Planning Commission have been nutted to attend this study session. The Maya may wish to solicit comnients from Planning Commissioners o provide the applicants with ar.Citionaf feedback on their projects. City Council Study Session - August 4, 1997 Maxim Development and Pruneyard E)q)wsion Page 3 1) Maxim Exhibits 2) Pruneyard Exnbile Prepared by: Steve iiaseckt, Community Development Director Approved by: Bern Stroj Manager Pruneyard Exhibits L�---- NX —EAST— — ='—'" - C.Y1Su — — \I � I 1 ,c s! a E I I u u ,_ u-" L } �}ice � 111 � �d i• 11�:�1 t�,tL I l i• f o - I I - --- f U ,-- ' 0 0 O O OG O© 0 O O ° I I <zi a e interoffice MEMORANDUM To: Bill Helms From: Peter Eakland. Traffic Engineer Subject: Traffic Impacts of Pruneyard Third Office Tower Date: July 23. 1997 CC: Steve Piasecki, GI a Sciara, Irk Heinrichs This memo revisits the traffic analysis summarized in the January, 1996 memo to the Pruneyard, which is attached. That analysis focused on traffic modeling and level of service analyses for conditions in the Pruneyatd with and without the proposed new tower both with and without Campisi extension. It was intended to be a preliminary analysis and was not intended to replace a more detailed study once the project reached the application stage. Several points are important to consider. First, the analysis was based on a 100,000 sq. ft. office tower while the proposal is now for a 120.090 sq. ft. building. Second, the traffic forecasts for the existing Pruneyard activities are, based on employee figures that have not been calibrated against recent traffic counts. Third, the baseline traffic counts are different than what has been used in the Maxim analysis and will have to be updated. References are to tables in the January. 1996 memo to Charles Bonno of the Pruneyard. Level of Service Analysis The traffic impacts of the proposed tower at major intersections is negligible. As shown in Table 2 There is less than 0.5 second delay increase at all intersections analyzed. At Bascom/Hamilton in the PM peak hour, the overall increase is only 0.43 seconds. The PM peak hour level of service is C at the four intersections adjacent to the Pruneyard, i e. Bascom/Campisi. Bascom/Pruneyard. Bascom!Campbell, and Campbell/Union. all There clearly are no traffic impacts to be mitigated based on this analysis. However, the baseline traffic figures are somewhat lower than what should be used for the final analysis They are based on data several years old and do not inciade traffic growth that would be expected until the project is completed. Nevertheless, the relative impact of the project probably would not be expected to change significantly. Campisi Extension Bill Helms Page 2 July 23, 1)77 As noted above, the Campisi extension cannot be justified as a mitigation measure because there are no impacts to mitigate. If there were mitigation measures required, the appropriate mitigation would be to improve traffic coordination on the Creekside/Campisi route in order to promote traffic to avoid Hamilton/Bascom. Signals on this route are at a higher level of service and can accommodate additional capacity. Tables 3 and 4 analyze the impact of the Campisi Extension. It is important to remember that traffic on this roadway would include three categories: (1) traffic to/from existing Pruneyard development, (2) traffic to/from the third Pruneyard tower, and (3) cut -through traffic. There are techniques that can be used to minimize the amount of cut -through traffic, but it should be recognized that such traffic would be a fact -of -like if the extension is provided. The modeling results are probably a reasonable estimate of the cut -through traffic that could be expected. As shown in Table 4, the traffic traveling to/from the existing Pr_mevard development would exceed that of traffic to the new tower, which is not surprising. This traffic helps justify the extension but cannot be used to justify the road as a mitigation measure. It is unreasonable to require a developer to reduce traffic levels at an intersection below what currently exists. Cut -through traffic is estimated to be higher than all traffic attributed to the Pruneyard (existing and proposed). It is twice the Pruneyard traffic in the AM peak and 50% higher in tic PM peak. The overall effect of the Campisi extension, as shown in Table 3, is to reduce overall delay at Bascom/Hamilton by two seconds and to increase delay at Campbell/Union by six se,;onds (all because of cut -through traffic). The latter impact is clearly undesirable, which highlights the need to reduce cut -through traffic. Summary Two conclusions can be made from the analysis. First, the Campisi Extension can not be justified as a mitigation measure for development of the Pruneyard Tower. Second, the Campisi Extension has potential as a roadway linking the Pruneyard to Creekside/Campisi. Unfortunately, any traffic that would use the roadway without a trip end at the Pruneyard should be discouraged and, thus, as policy. the extension can not be assumed to accommodate trips from other projects. Nevertheless, the issue does arise of who should get credit for trips generated by the existing Pruneyard facilities that would use the Campisi Extension. It is logical that the amount of traffic reductions at the Pruneyard and Hamilton intersections could be credited to developments on Creekside, e.g. the proposed Maxim project. It is even possible that such developments could pay for the entire Campisi Extension and take credit for all traffic reductions. The only restriction would be that there be no double counting of traffic reduction credits. However, there are several important caveats. First, the other developments must result in a traffic impact -equiting mitigation. Second, the cost and effectiveness of alternative mitigation measures should be considered. For example, improved signal timing might be able to achieve enough changes in traffic patterns to -educe impacts to an insignificant level. Bill Helms Page 3 July 23, 1997 Additional Considerations The analysis of the Bascom/Hamilton intersection to be contained in the Maxim traffic impact study is as follows: average delay of 50 seconds for existing conditions, 51 second for project conditions (1 second increase), and 54 seconds for cumulative conditions (additional 3 second increase), which includes Winchester Drive -In, Pruneyard Tower, and more intense development of the Apple complex. A!most certainly, it would be difficult to exact any mitigation fees from increased usage of the Apple complex, as long as it could be accommodated with it existing parking spaces. The Creekside-Campisi route provides a feasible alternative to any eastbound or northbound left turns that have been forecast for this project. Thus, signal timing and minor signing and restriping could achieve the one second traffic impact. if indeed it were even considered necessary to mitigate this level of impact. The inescapable conclusion. I think, is that the Campisi/Creekside connection that Prometheus constructed is even today an adequate source of mitigation for anticipated major projects in the area. I would not disagree that the public might see the Prune%ard T, -,er and the Maxim projects as significantly increasing traffic levels in the area. Hm,ever, several points need to be considered why the traffic analyses do nit support this viewpoin!. Much of the traffic generated by the two proposed office projects is against the current maximum peak hour Flows. In general, traffic moves out from Campbell in the AM peak to job destinations and returns in the PM peak. Traffic moving in the opposite direction, even for large projects, can have an insignificant impact on level of service and, thus, should be supported. Second, not all of the intersections in the area are close to capacity, and alternative routes exist to by pass the Bascom/Hamilton intersection. Thud, all movements have high capacities for all movements because approaches have three through lanes, in some cases double left turn lanes, and free right turn lanes. Finally, traffic generated comes from multiple directions, which spreads out the impacts over numerous intersections. 1 `,*.c 44# CITY of CAMPBELL January 5, 1996 Public Works Department Mr. Charles H. Bonno The Prunevard 1999 South Bascom Avenue, Suite 200 Campbeil, CA 95008 Dear Mr. Benno: Our office has compleind its preliminary review of the impact of adding a third office building at the Pruneyard complex The analysis was intended to provide a preliminary assessment of the degree of impact that could be expected when the building would be fully occupied. The analysis indicates that the trips that would be generated could be accommodated at adjacent intersections both in the AM and PM peak hours, based on existing volumes and the existing street network. Certainly, there are no fatal flaws from a traffic perspective that would prevent further planning for the project. We have not analyzed the cumulative impacts of the project, which would include traffic generated by approved projects in the area and expected growth, and, thus, are unable to detail the cumulative impacts or the future mitigation measures that will be required for this traffic. It is anticipated that the City will ask the Pruneyard to share equitably in the development of these mitigation measures, based on the additional trips generated by the proposed project. As part of this analysis, we also analyzed the extent to which the extension of Campisi Way into the Pruneyard would improve traffic operations on adjacent arterials. This analysis does not imply that the City of Campbell at this time is committed to the building of this project, but it can serve as the basis for future discussions and analysis concerning this specific mitigation measure. Given the broad distribution of traffic to and from the proposed office building, this project would not mitigate all impacts and would create several issues of its own, including the significant number of through trips that would be attracted to the facility. The overall analysis, it should be understood, does not take the place of a detailed traffic impact study that would meet the requirements of the Congestion Management Program. Such a study will have to be prepared because the number of peak hour trips exceeds 100 trips. This analysis will have to consider the impacts of other approved projects as well as expected growth. The analysis that our office has prepared will be of considerable assistance in preparing this report should the Pruneyard management decide to proceed further with the project; and we will make available all documentation of the analysis to the traffic consultant selected to complete the detailed report. 1 70 North Ftrtt Street Campbell. Calilnrnu vs0U8 14_3 ni 408 866 7150 r�s 408 79.7371 'DO 408 866.3790 NEW P eA. A brief description of the methodology used for the analysis and a summary of results follows: METHODOLOGY First, the number of inbound and outbound trips that would be generated for a i0u,000 sq. ft. office building was estimated for both the weekday AM and PM peak hours. Based on data in the latest Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, the peak hour trips in the AM would be 191 (170 inbound and 21 outbound) and in the PM would be 186 trips (32 inbound and 154 outbound). A separate traffic analysis zone was set up for the proposed project; and trip generation variables, i.e. employment, were specified that provided the closest approximation to the ITE numbers. The City-wide traffic model was then run for the existing street network to establish the distribution and assignment of project trips. Model rats were also made with the addition of a Campisi extension so that the source and amount of traffic that would use this new link could be forecast. After trip forecasts had been made, level of service analysis were made for nine signalized intersections in the vicinity of the Pruneyard. A comparison was made between traffic conditions with and without the traffic from the proposed office building so that the impacts could be analyzed. Level of service was performed using a software program called TRAFFIX in a manner chat closely resembles the analyses required for CMA traffic impact reports. The software has the advantage of being able to quickly ,. Wyze the impacts of proposed projects and to document in detail the changes in volumes at intersections. For the Campisi extension, the origin and destination of all trips forecast to use the extension were first identified. Appropriate adjustments in existing traffic volumes at intersections were made to reflect the changes in traffic patterns. Some intersections would experience increases in traffic volumes, e.g. Campisi at Creekside, while others would experience decreases, e.g. Hamilton at Bascom. SUMMARY OF RESULTS Table 1 presents the forecast distribution of trips to and from the proposed office building during the AM and PM peak hours. Noteworthy is the relatively equal distribution of traffic from each direction, which distributes the impacts as well. Level of Service Analysis with Existing Street Network Table 2 presents the summary of the level of service analysis with and without the proposed project. LOS ranges from A to F, with A having average delays per vehicle less than or equal to 5.0 seconds and F having delays greater than 60 seconds. An intersection is considered to be impacted according to the Congestion Management Program when the additional traffic exceeds one percent of the intersection's capacity. During the AM peak hour, LOS at all intersection is C or better, and the project volumes do not create a change in level of service. The only two intersections that are impacted (volume -to -capacity (v/c) change more than I %) are at LOS B. They are Bascom at Pruneyard and Campbell at Union. Table 1 Directions of Travel to/from Proposed Pruney-d Building (100,000 sq. R.) Area AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Inbound Outbound Total Inbound Outbound Total North and East of Bascom at Hamilton 45 3 48 15 37 52 West of Bascom at Hamilton, Incl. Hwy. 17 28 3 31 4 29 33 South and West of Campbell at Union 58 0 58 6 44 50 South and East of Bascom at Campbell 30 5 35 4 39 43 Totals 161 11 172 29 149 178 For the PM peak hour, existing traffic volumes generally are higher than in the morning. The two most congested intersection are at LOS D and already utilizing more than 90 percent of the intersection capacity. For the Bascom/Hamilton intersection, the increase m v/c is at, but does not exceed, the impact threshold of adding one percent of capacity. The impact on the Hamilton at Sahmar !wersection is minimal, considerably less than one percent. The Bascom at Pruneyard and Campbell at Union intersections are impacted but remain at LOS C, which is acceptable. In summary, the impacts of the proposed project on any single intersection are modest; and the project could proceed without the need for any major mitigation measures at the time the project is completed. Nevertheless, due to the incremental growth that can be expected at critical intersection, the Pruneyard would be expected to contribute to mitigation measures that would be defined as part of the project review process. Level of Service Analysis with Campisi Extension Tables 24 contain information about the traffic consequences of constructing the Campisi extension. The facility would be used by Pruneyard origins and destinations as well as some through traffic. As shown in Table 4, Pruneyard traffic would represent approximately one- third of the traffic on the extension in the AM peak hour and 42 percent in the PM peak hour. The proposed building would represent approximately 45 percent of the Pruneyard- related trips. Both t.,;pes of traffic would result in a reduction of traffic at Hamilton and Bascom, which has the worst congestion of the intersections in the immediate vicinity of the Pruneyard, and an increase in traffic at the intersection of Campbell at Union. As shown in Table 3, the traffic reduction at Hamilton/Bascom represents approximately six percent of capacity and the increase at Campbell/Union is approximately eight percent. The analysis indicates that the Campisi extension would be helpful to the Pruneyard in that a percentage of trips to and from the development could be made in shorter times than at present and that congestion at the Bascom/Hamilton intersection could be reduced somewhat. It is also evident that other developments also would bet..:frt, as they could take advantage of the "new" capacity at the Hamilton/Bascom intersection. The issue of the through trips is likely of concern to the Pruneyard. However, it would be difficult to limit through trips without also inhibiting several of the movements for Pruneyard traffic. I would be glad to discuss in more detail the results of the analysis. As I indicated, the analysis suggests that the project could proceed without having any serious short-term impacts on the adjacent road system and the Campisi Extension would be a useful but not necessarily manaatory improvement measure. ly � / // Peter Eakland Traffic Engineer file: j:\traffrx2\prt0wa1l.doc zIzIzIzIi�zi>�zIz 5z z z zt r z N z 25 8 0 8 o c 8 oo�oo�000 2: I O O J C G O C O C O O C O C o O O O o N J � aril 000 C �/1 7 V'1 C C C O C C C O - r O C C C C C C O O v� N O r 7 a •7 z a N r pO� oo a r N a r V1 OOG 7 V'1 .Y V�1 M O C C O O O O O C r N O r r O M N N — 00 a1 O ,r .0 c N f!• C 0,0 i D O C O 7 �O N' a •� ^ I .61 C G G 2 - E. U z u it _ u U i 'E A A 2 ti E, Z U z S r 3 e x vt 0 Ltl g =_ E S `: A E ti E m E m in E m L'J c E U Z Y U z U ... z� a v, o- m C g E S 6 E E CA rq Z E m H 7 0 Z 0 fL V] a- E U Z a U z u Y U u z z z z r z 0 z z O p O _ G p O O pp O 00 O N O C 0 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 00 ° O v r O o• .n v. amommommo ao 0o v O O ..• O C O C O e�mmmwm© z z z z r z r z O O O O O O O O O O ammmoommu vi e^ c0 ammmoommu vi e^ c0 O O O O O O O O O r e T o °. M ° L N N mmmmmmmmu � 3 z 3 3� m •� 3 3 3� �, - 7 � o .a r x U a U a a A A A A 3 � � a t in in H u'� Z Z_ �? y z Z Z Z 3 z Z — o ` o z -I-J�La 3 A E E E . �2 �i ° E A E E E c Y 2 v', r� ai c� U �C ,yj C� 2 fL m m U U U o o g o� o$ — S �— ` ( J ( j Z . ( . ( ( • . ° \&' . (�10 2 . . . . . . - CD 2 o - 22E 2 - 10 _ 2 3 k- ` a / ) $ \ u I u;■ f Wr \ � \ \ \ § ) § § u u u 4 a 2 2 2 2 u u u G @ 0 6 E s e - U ti D F c e BQ N 6� o010 8E 6$ b° `O Se 6'2 6° 62 oe 8e 6° HQ V L L 7 — L Y a O• — m V �D O C �D O �O m O 0, O. N b`e b`e o6e0 O K W � Fo N c m o N n ^+ — o ao v r - c a N ry O r v •a A V U o .y = 'O N m 7 O• N O N 7 7 � m _ o0 O — fr] a cc L— F po 3� m bo ° 72 - 2 a a E v'� �` a v' m u F Ll .2 J 02. FF a �F FiRa: DEPARTMENT — r. �• SANTA CLARA COUNTY 147(x) WmchestLr Blvd., Los Gatos. CA 95030 1818 (408) 378-4010 (phone) • (408) :178 9s42 ((aa 97 -1952 r-„ iR PA 97-52 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENTS �, EIS M0, I�OYREMEM Review of plans for a proposed new 120,000 square foot 6-story office tower; a separate three story parking structure; and a 54-room addition to the existing Pruneyard Inn. LFC 1. Req((ired Fire Flow: Required fire flow for the proposed new Tower is 3,750 'IFPA7d"� GPM at 20 psi residual pressure for a duration of three hours. The required fire flow for the parking structure is 1,500 GPM at 20 psi residual pressure for two hours. The required fire flow is not available from area water mains and fire hydrant(s) which are spaced at the required spacing. UFC 2. Aylpmatic Fire Sprinkler System Required- Buildings requiring a fire flow in 1 0 03.2.2 excess of 2,000 GPM and/or in excess of two stories in height (35 Feet) shall be a equipped throughout with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. The ev 17.04.040 fire sprinkler system shall be hydraulically designed per National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard #13, 1994 Edition. LTpC 3. Final uired Fire Flow: Required fire flow may be reduced up to 501% in 1AIf"d"` buildings equipped with automatic fire e-srinkler systems but, can be no less seE•tm" s than 1,500 GPM. Therefore, as fire sprinklers are required, the adjusted required fire flow is 1,500 GPM at 20 psi. residual pressure for three hours This flow shall be taken from any two fire hydrants, on or near the site so long as they are spaced at a maximum spacing of 250 feet. utr 4• Private Fire Hydrant(s) Required:_ Provide 6 private on -site fire hvdrant(s) at 903.2 location(s) to be determined by the Fire Department Maximum hydrant spacing shall be 250 feet and the minimum single flow hvdrant shall be 1500 GPM at 20 psi residual pressure. —� KNM Kp Nl1r IWOL Y OCCVIENn' CON{T. "PE at CBL ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ HORNBERGER r WORSTELL. INC 07/21/97 1 01 , newUaa( wM 'swo aEcwnta� ns New t(300 Commercial L)evelopment Hokaon, Wayne _L wwe a wcxer PRUNEYARD PLACC Bascom Av, S A C'.Id .. a h" P-n.•nx„, 1)"1r t •x•min9 tianle fla," (m and (he .... .mm„ '," " C_,,J.11. C.lw,11 ,. L.- Ali-. Los AIL- HIM. I .n (:ms. Mn-rr 5.•n•nu. Mo W" f.1 and 0d�rC�ARA c�G,y FIRM DEPARTMENT SANTA CLARA COUNTY 14700 Winchester Md . Los (iato., CA 05030 IS IS (408) 378 4010 Uhooe1 • (408) 37`, ,) 142 (fax) COD1-EC. 9 0 CDRt rwMeER RLDD PE --ER PLu, REVRw rRW�ER 97-1952 FlLE MIY.ER PA 97-52 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENTS UFC I 5 Private On Site Fire Service Mains and Hydrants: Installations shall conform to 903.2 National Fire Protection Association Standard #24, and Fire Department Standard Details and Specification W-2. L'K 6. Timing of Required Water SuRply Installations: Required Fire Hydrant and 901.2 Water Supply installations shall be in place, inspected, tested and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of framing construction. Bulk construction materials may not be delivered to the construction site until installations are completed as stated above. Clearance for building permits may be held until installations are Completed. UK 7. Location of Required Fire Protection System(s) Equipment: Location of Fire 1001-7.1 1ao1.e Hydrants, Fire Sprinkler Syste:n(s) Control Valves (PIV / OS&Y), Fire Department Connections (FDC) and Fire Warm Equipment shall be coordinated with the Fire Department and the Project Planners. c'rIc 8. Fire Apparatus (ladder Truck) Access$PAds 902.2.2.1 ReaujEgd Provide access roadways with a paved all weather surface and a minimum unobstructed width of 30 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches, minimum circulating turning radius of 48 feet outside and 36 feet inside, a maximum slope of 10"Sr and vehicle loading of 72,000 pounds. LFC 9. Fife Ladder Truck Set Up Area(s) Option: Provide Fire Department Ladder Y02.z.2.1 Truck Set Up Areas with a minimum unobstructed width of 30 feet and and minimum length of .vO feet. Area shall support 75,000 pounds of gauss vehicle weight. Area shall be paved or other engineered surfaces may be used with Fire Department approval. daTllrCT RwRS E'Fp i9vi -IiL Y rin IPERYRTFE ' Wn - - CBI- 0 ❑ 0 ❑ HORNBERGER + WORSTELL INC 07/21IV �2 EEChLOOR YEE LOAD in N— fowe,. Commercial Development Hokanson, Wayne LoeAnoR PRUNEYARD PLACE Bascom Av, S A CDII/o.niD Foe Pmre,wm th-, r s, my &mw Cln a (',cur li mid dx , ( ,_PWl. Cup,,I n— Loa All,n. Los All- Hills. L... (b'I- Afome .L•.onn. Mr,.ym, I fill—d.s..uvD `l BRA r Flit, DEPARTMENT SANTA CLARA COUNTY 14700 Nluuhe.tcr Hlvd.. L- (iat— CA 95030-18IS (4081 378 41110 (phone) • 1408) 378-9.342 (fax) - - Fueerrewwr.ee 97-1952 nLF —F. PA 97-52 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENTS COD6gED. 0. Mo. 11EDII-MmuIf -- ---- — UFC 2.1 10. Required Plans and Permits: Plans for fire apparatus access roads and fire 402.2.2.2 hydrant systems shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to construction. Permits are required for the installation of all Private Water Supply, Tank, and Hydrant Systems and must be issued to contractors prior to the start of installation of such systems. w02 z a 1 IL Parking Along Roadways: The required width of fire access roadways shall not be obstructed in any manner. Parking shall not be allowed along roadways less than 28 feet in width. Parking will be allowed along one side of the street for roadways 28-35 fact in width. For roadways equal to or greater than 36 feet parking will be allowed on both sides of the roadway. Roadway widths shall be measured face to face of curb. Parking spaces are based on an 8 ft wide space. Provide a parking plan which identifies contingencies for employee parking during phases of construction where parking now available becomes unavailable. op] a _, 12. Fire Lane Marking Required: Provide marking for all roadways within the project. Markings shall be per fire department specifications. Installations shall also conform to Local Government Standards and Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications A-6. 9022..4 13. Fire Department Key Box Required: Provide an approved fire department key box and appropriate building keys. Installations shall conform with Fire Department Standard Detail and Specification K-l. NOTE: this comment F+rvlies to tower M3 (and rarI ft structure if after hours se(1 to is u4ilizetU, -'RiTiiet wiwe iren KW ml , s Dca�we:r coesr. d ne g structure "& tt CBL ❑ p O 0 0 I HORNBERGER . WORSTELL INC 07/21/97 3 OF 3 UCJR D - 4fA ' L D D[eCMreel • ry New h.wer Commercial Development wer__. i _� _ P Hokancon, Waynear.w IDCAreln PRUNEYARD PLACE Ba.-om A%, S AC.114 aFire Vnrrvn„IMn�r ny .�� ...... �niJ rhr•�., rnhr•... — Cempbell.C,,,—h I,-AIt-.1•�.Ah,•.Ildl.I��.r„—�,�V.., , r,.ti 11,1E nnd.4,.anyµr 43. T11'E PRUNFYARID i July 1, 1997 Planning Department City of Campbell 70 North First Street Campbell, CA 95008 Attention: Steve Piasecki, AICP Community Development Director RE: Development Application fcr Use Permit and Site and Architectural Review Pruneyard Inn expansion, 1995 S. Bascom Ave and PruneYard Place, address to be established. Dear Steve, The PruneYard is a mixed -use property situated on 27.2 acres at Bascom and Campbell Avenues in Campbell California. It consists of one 18 story high rise office building comprising 116.743 rentable square feet, which was constructed in 1971 (Tower One) and one ten -story high rise office building consisting of 117.476 rentable cquare feet built in 1974 (Tower'iwo), both of which are located on the west side of the property. A 251,121 square foot shopping center sits on the east side of the property. The third component of this project is the PruncYard Inn, a 1 18-room, three story hotel located at the north end of the property which was constructed in 1989. As part of our application, we are requesting the following: I. Our plan is to build a new office building of approximately 120.000 rentable square ect to be constructed between the two existing Towers. This office building would consist of six stories as shown on the enclosed building plans. Compuware Corporation will occupy a portion of the new building ,( at present Compuware Corporation has committed to 501/6 of the project) and this will allow for their Western Regional Headquarters to remain in Campbell and to accommodate other growing companies interested in locating at the PruneYard. 2. In order to accommodate the addition parking required when adding the third office building, we will construct a three story, (ground plus two suspended levels) garage with a capacity of approximately 809 parking stalls. As shown on the enclosed plans, this parking structure would be located at the North end of the property. This efficient parking addition will accommodate the increased retail traffic at night and on weekends. 3. Simultaniously we are also requesting approval for the expansion of the PruneYard Inn. This plan calls for the demolition of unleased two story retail area and construction of new hotel rooms, as shown on the enclosed plans. The Inn presently has 118 rooms. Our proposal is to expand the hotel by an additicnal 50 to 54 rooms. This has been previously conceptually approved by the City Council of the City of Campbell. We look forward to receiving your comments on our application. We remain very grateful for the high level of attention you are devoting to our project. Sincerely PruneYard Associates, LLC William Wilson & Associates Its Managing Agent Jeanne Shook-Arterberry. CPM MEMORANDUM CITY OF CAMPBELL TO: Marlene Fomeroy DATE: November 25, 1996 Public Works Department FROM: Jar Hem ley C Clerk's Office fgC-V 2519% SUBJECT: Grant Deeds for Recording �- Please find attached copies of original, fully recorded documents as follows: Grant of Easement for Drainage Purposes - 1875 Bascom Avenue - Pruneyard Associates; and Grant Deed for Public Street Purposes - 1875 Bascom Avenue - Pruneyard Associates The original, recorded, documents have been filed in the vault. Record .WSRc**-dby ) DOCUMENT: 13496771 1 TitI.sm1 / P.qn: 7 CITY OF CAMPBELL > IIIIIIIIIIIII .: a 'No Few When Recorded Mail To ) •t„«rna AMT PAID City Clerk ) BRENDA DAVIS RDE s 002 City of Campbell ) SANTA CLARA COUNTY RECORDER lei25/1996 70 North First Street ) Recorded at the request of 2 58 pM Campbell, CA 95008 ) C , t y (Space Above Tbis Line For Recorder's Use) GRANT DEED FOR PUBLIC STREET PURPOSES FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES, LLC hereby GRANT(s) to the Ciy of Cam N.14fomtrtn�ie .tinsw, 4616wemwam, San of California, for public street and related purposes, all of that terrain real property within said City and more particularly described as follows: SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF Said properties are generally shown on the mKbed PW Maps B acid C. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COLNTY OF c J .n-7-. On before me, ode geed, a the uNotary Public to and for said Stare, personally appeared D—; A /t. sa,. y, pcnooally mown n me (or proved m me on the bam of sadsfacmry evidence) to be the peraoo� whose nsmew is,© subscribed to the within instru....or and acmowledged m me that he/skte executed the same in his/her/ aumoriud Zhu). and that by his/her/ W dgoamreW on the instrument the psra,..U, or the unity upon behalf of which the penooU acted. executed the instrument. WrrNESS my hand and official sad. Name/tree G/..(fn..—, (typed or primed) lavtftMw. RNiN� s .�, 4 coatM s1fN101 ! fttwv keno — CMAssa j SAN MAY60 CCWW MV Caron. 6411600 MAV 21,19" I:Ubr=VQAz%psp Page 1 of 6 This area for official mtarial seal. 1999 S. BASCOM AVE. S 97-20/ UP 9 7-1 1 9 OF 9 CITY OF (;t' MPBE.rL PLAN. 12/99 I. PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES, L.I.C., a California limited liabiu.f company By: OPPORTUNITY CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P. a Califomia limited partnership Managing Member By: OFFICE OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION a Cali.fomia corporation Gen er By:/ �JO Name:_ C ,f Title: ! "97, By: tI..1yyvvrti^'� una:�1. dVlc.YttcaJ Mu Title: c Fp Page 2 of 6 EXHIBIT A PARCE II A portion of that certain parcel of land shown on that certain Record of Survey recorded November 14, 1968 in Book 244 of Maps, at page 42, Santa Clara County Records, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeast corner of the parcel of lane, as hereinabove described; THENCE along the easterly line of said parcel of !and, and the westerly line of South Bascom Avenue, South 925.81 feet; THENCE along a tangent curve to the right with a radius of 50.00 feet through a central angle of 90°00'00" for an arc distance of 78.54 feet to a point on the northerly line of Campbell Avenue; THENCE along the northerly line of Campbell Avenue, West 156.96 feet to a point on the northerly line of Campbell Avenue; THENCE siong the northerly line of said strip of land, North 87°09'45" East 162.82 feet; THENCE along a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 42.00 feet through a central angle of 53°43'08" for an arc distance of 39.38 feet, to a point on the westerly line of said strip of land, a radial at which point bears North 56°33'23" West; THENCE along said westerly line, North 948.97 feet to the northerly line of said parcel of lard hereinabove described; THENCE along said northerly line, South 89°52'00" East 1'..00 feet to the said POUT OF BEGINNING of this description. Containing an area of 0.260 acres, more or less. Said property is generally shotm the attached Exhibit B. PARCEL-. A portion of that certain parcel of land shown on that certain Record of Survey recorded November 14, 1968 in Book 244 of Maps, at page 42, Santa Clan County Records, and being more particularly descrbed as follows: BEGINNING at the southwest comer of the parcel of land as hereinabove described; THENCE along the westerly line of said parcel of land, and the easterly line of State Highway 17, along a non -tangent curve to the left, a radial at which point bean North 75.5f'14" West, having a radius of 2800.00 feet through a central angle of 00"02'32" an arc distance of 2.06 feet Page 3 of 6 to a line parallel with and distant 2.00 feet northerly from the northerly iine line of Campbell Avenue; THENCE along said parallel line, South 90°00'00" East 294.46 feet; THENCE South 00°00'00" West 2.00 feet to the northerly line of Campbcll Avenue; THENCE along northerly line of Campbell Avenue, North 90°00'00" West 294.98 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of this description. Containing an area of 0.014 acres, more or less. Said property is generally shown on the attached Exhibit C. WITNESS our hand(s) this day of 1996. PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., a California limited liability company By: OPPORTUNITY CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P. a California limited partnership - qf ESS/p Managing Member t^ By: OFFICE OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION a California corporation Gener ner �. By: Name: Title: E t Name fZry, ,4+-A— lit. f g,— _ Title: ��Fp_ Page 4 of 6 EXHIBIT B ee9• 52W E r.o.e. o 0 M Qppf ESS/ i 8 58' m 470 erect �` t Al\E�Q PARCEL ' A7 a o LAND TO of GJtAFiTED e a CONTAM 0.2e0 AC :D 4 BOOK 244 PAGE 42 Z w ACROSS 7 Q APN 288-04-24. 1875 S. BASCOM AVENUE :2 PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES, L.P. O a California limited partnership Q GROSS AREA — 27.243 AC f m REMAINDER AREA — 26.969 AC EXHIBIT A — 0.260 AC EXHIBIT B— 0.014 AC f 8 TOTAL AREA — 0.274 AC t o sa•4atir t R 42.00' 0 L 39.36' Ne7.09'4S'E 76t.62' WEST 160.96 i p 90.0000' CAMPBELL AVENUE -2.o 4+00 WEST 1+00 _ 0+o 8 LAND TO BE GRANTED TO THE CITY OF CAMPBELL INFORMATION PLAT BASED ON RECORD DATA (OK 244 P 42) MI BYn P.w aw . !100 *G' w r. io o. G� ismCJ Mt7t ORA�1 fY: 11r MAA10 M0. !w A � aye 5 of 5 • i • 900109102 (40)w-7900/PAT. (40)6"-1+94 locf eye YID - EXHIBIT C of ESS �Q t 3 � 2 ' BOOK 244 PAGE 42 1 ACROSS FW ' APN 288-04-011 do 015 1875 S. BASCOM AVENUE I PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES. LP., / a Colifomia limited oartnership / GROSS AREA — 27.243 AC f REMAINDER AREA — 26.969 AC f / EXHIBIT A — 0.260 AC f / EXHIBIT 8 — 0.014 AC f TOTAL AREA — 0.274 AC f / R • :eoo.00 r PARCEL ' B' som / L 2.06' LAND TO BE GRANTED CONiAMfS OA I / AC f CAST n4l.46, t3+00 12+00 WEST n+ao 10.00E CAMPBELL AVENUE LAND TO BE GRANTED TO THE CITY OF CAMPBELL INFORMATION PLAT BASED ON RECORD DATA (W 244 P 42) Mt w"W pw% or. am" too !m JW% CA Ntft �A� M� OAI1M19 M0. • R R f R l i t R• t R f I f t I R f NMkM-7f00/IN (AM)AM'ttf. J f90 6 Of 6 ACCEPTED ON THIS14 day 0;64_f4 for all nn h,ha'f of the City of Cilnpbell, a C^rporation, of the State of CzlHcnil, ruru -t to Resolution No. 749, rccorded in Book 4509 — m� 1B0 Sam Clara County Records. Anne Byoee, Cih, Clerk City of Campue.,, Caufonla If 1'77 Recording Requested by ) DOCUMENT: 1 !d Titles' I / pag)es. ) CITY OF CAMPBELL I1'1"� Fees • No Fees Wben Recorded Mail To ) Taxes.. ) aNt34p.M• ' CopiesANT City Clerk ) PAID ) BRENDA City of Campbell 70 North First Street DAVIS RDE N 402 ) SANTA CLARA COUNTY RECORDER Campbell, CA 95008 18/25/19% ) Recorded at the request of 2 58 PM City (Space Above Thu I— For RacoMer'a U.) GRANT OF FASFMFNT t:nv nnAfWAt-o FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which Is bereby acknowledged, PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES, LLC a California limited liability company bereby GRANT(s) to the City of Campbell, a municipal corporation, of the County of Santa Clan, Stage of CaliNunia, an easement to build and waintain an underground pipeline, and necessary devices and appuraenances. over. under, along and across, ail of that certain real property whhin said City and more particululy described as follows: SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO AT N1DE A PART HEREOF Said Property contains 0.453 acres, more or less, and is generally shown 00 the attached Pat Map. Page I of 5 The Grant of Easement herein conamed d" include the fight to Cum eeid psemiast, m attrrcy, t>oscect. reconstruct, lay. relay, erring maintain. oche oe. control, trwe and remove said Pipeline' 'a Bx"n ea, wPPWUWoaes. sed w remove objects interfering with the construction operation wed maioemoes thereof. The Gswntoe nwmves the right to occupy and use Wd premises fa say purpose not ineomieseen with the rigla wed granted and wprivileges above which will not interfere with a endanger said pipeline. rib fixnues and appurtenances a the use thereof. The City shad use due care in the conswwr;on, operation and maimenanca of SAW ppeliee, its fitertd and appurtenances. Th. provisions hereof shall fmtre to the benefit of sod be binding upon heirs, succession, ��; and Personal representatives of the respective pasties hcrew STATE OF CALIFORNIA ICOUNTY OFJ On SYc before me, the under gned, a Norary Public m and for said State, personally appeared __• 2 in.N -.�.Wy, personally Imovn to me (or proved w me on the basis of satia6crory evidence) w be the persons whose mmeU is, subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me Nu he/she teyleascute7 the acme in his/her/ 4�0 w@ucrizei capacity Les). and that vy his/her/ Si tignamre.Us on the imwmem the person(y), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. — WITNESS my hand and official small. Sigrurure Vame__ K �/rr U Jfr (typed or printed) jMormstgrantdrain Page 2 of s SEE AI'4CBED SIGNATURE BLOCK KAYMN W. WFAM ! Norco thbwe - Caswsrs SAN WAT&O COUNir aM Canm. Fasaras ASAr! t,t0a1 This arse for official nowial ". PRUNL ARD ASSOCIATES, LLC., a California limited liability company By: OPPORTUNITY CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P. a California limited partnership Managing Member By: OFFICE OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION a California corporation General Partner By _ _ Name: ! G %ES/e Title: to B, ame:io..- Title: CIsZ_ Page 3 of 5 EJai1BIT A A strip of land of uniform width of twenty (20) feet de.<eribed as follows A portion of that certain parcel of land shown on that certain Record o: Survey recorded November 14, 1968 in Book 244 of Maps, at page 42, Santa Clara County Records, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwest corner of the parcel of land as hereinabove described; THENCE along the westerly line of said parcel of land, and the easterly lint of State Highway 17, along a non -tangent curve to the Ieft, a radial tt which point bears North 75056' 14" West, having a radius of 2800.00 feet through a central angle of 20°I0'40", an arc distance of 986.07 feet to the northwest comer of said parcel of land; THENCE along the northerly line of said parcel of land, South 89'52'00" East 20.12 feet; THENCE along a non -urgent curve to the right with a radius of 2920.00 feet through a .ventral angle of 20"01'53" for an arc distance of 985.92 feet, to a point on the southerly line of said parcel of :and, and the northerly lire of Campbell Avenue; THENCE along said northerly line of Campbell Avenue, West 20.61 feet to the said POINT OF BEGINNING of this description. Containing an area of 0.453 acres, more or less Said propertm is generally shown on th a ched Exhibit B. 7 WITNESS our handls) this day of 1996. PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., a California limited liability company By: OPPORTUNITY CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P. QROf ESS a California limited partnership O Managing Member ti By: OFFICE OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION a Call) is corporation y ZbpV G eral er By: Name: i Title: < < Si By: rt,r Name: �f . Ma+lfu�emu-, Title CF-) Paga 4 of 5 acwc .12' EXHIBIT B I I I 20 PUBL1C STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT I I O N it t A O qpO 01 � O r Q , 3 I X % BOOK 244 PAGE 42 a i L1 ► • ACROSS F— I APN 288-04-011 do 015 IQ / 1875 S. BASCOM AVENUE V i PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES. LP., 0, N / a CalifOmia limited partnership �opofESS/pN WEST 20.61 • 13a . t3+oD .__. Tly �l�pp M ST 11.00 1 10+00 CAMPBELL AVENUE r �f EASEMENT TO BE GRANTED TO THE CITY OF CAMPBELL INFORMATION PLAT BASED ON RECORD DATA (BK 244 P 42) hrt Dr. 2Wb Ito SM i1. CA 911131 • 4IN IF U l f 1 11• t o l Y t t t t (4")W ?="At (4tt)w-1194 `_ _ page 5 of s ACCEPTED ON THIS4L of f IIyL for aM on behalf of the City of Campbell, a 1,'u'71i .31 Corporation, of the State of Af-rii3, purwvt to Resolution No. 749, rccor'. 3cl in Book 4509 — Page 180 Santa Clara C^o^:v R-coris. i Anne Bybee, City Clerk City of Campbell, Cakfomla ' Recording Requested by DOCUMENT: Titlgo, I / pages: CITY OF CAMPBELLe I Fees No aas When Recorded Mail To Texas I wta•asrn. COP iat City Clerk City of Campbell ) AMT PA I D ) BRENDA DAVIS 70 North First Street trees ) SANTA CLARA COUNTY RECORDER RIDE a 002 Recorded 10/25/1996 Campbell, CA at the request of city 2 58 PM (Space Above This Liee For Recorder's Use) GRANT ntt r A cs: *rr,.— .. -- —• ....rs.u.esvas ruurV5ES VALUABLE CONSIDERATION. receipt of which is hereby actmowledged PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES, LLC a California limited liability company hereby GRANT(s) to the City of Campb;ll, a municipal corporation, of the County of Santa Clan, State of California. an easement to build and maintain An underground pipelio^. and necessary devices and appurtenant, over. under. along and across, all of that certain real property within said City and more Particular described As follows:es SEE EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF Said prcperry contains 0.453 acres. more or less. and is generally shown on the attached Plat Map. Page 1 of 5 The Grant of Easement herein contained shall include the right to emu said Prcmitea, so survey. eonmloct. reconstruct, lay, relay, maintain, operate, control. toe and remove aid pipeline, its axisim, apptrsagswea. and to remove objects interfering with the construction, operation and maintenance thereof. The Grantor reames the right to occupy and use said premises for any purpose not inconsistent with the rights and granted and which will not interfere with or endanger said pipeline, its fixmres ands less above appu thereof. The City shall use due cue in the commuction, operation and msiorenamce of "id or die fizmres use and appurtenances.'ita The provisions hereof shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon heirs, site rs, anigns, and persomal representatives of the respective parties hereto. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF On 4 iSYe before me. the underKsned. a 'Notary Public io and for said State, personally appeared zQA N/ • - - Personally known to me (ur proved to me on the basis of ssdsfscwry evidence) to be the personig whose name(q is/0 subscribed to the within instrument and aclmowkdged to that he she( ney�executed the woo ir, hWkfl authorized capacityLes). and that by his/ber/ signamreLs) on the instrument the personiAL or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature /'-- Name K �/rC. IJ Jfrye (typed or primed) Page 2 of 5 j:Vormstgramdrain SEE ATTACHED SIGNATURE BLOCK eAMffN W. AgvgM� owmir COWA I105"M NowPtbae -CnateafAN M1k%0 C0(VrV Co— eymew MAY 21.190 This arcs for official notarial seal. PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., a California limited liability company By: OPPORTUNITY CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P. a California limited partnership Managing Member By: OFFICE OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION a California corporation General Partner By; CA" !% Name: L / Title: XF i ✓T « By: 'Name: t^c.. M Ly� J Jam .o..- Page 3 of s EXHIBIT A A strip of land of uniform width of twenty (20) feet described as follows: A portion of that certain parcel of land shown on that certain Record of Survey recorded November 14, 1968 in Book 244 of Maps, at page 42, Santa Clara County Records, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwest comer of the parcel of land as hereinabove described THENCE along the westerly line of said parcel of land, and the easterly line of State Highway 17, along a non-tangmt curve to the left, a radial at which point bees North 75*56*14" Weal, having a radius of 2800.O9 feet through a central angle of 20°I0'40", an arc distance of 986.07 feet to the northwest comer of said parcel of land; THENCE along the northerly line of said parcel of land, South 89°52'00" East 20.12 feet; THENCE along a non -tangent curve to the right with a radius of 2820.00 feet through a central angle of 20*01'53" for an arc distance of 985.92 feet, to a point on the southerly line of said parcel of land, and the northerly line of Campbell Avenue: THENCE along said northerly line of Campbell Avenue, West 20.61 feet to the said POINT OF BEGINNING of this description. Containing an area of 0.453 acres, more or less. Said property is generally shown on th�ched Exhibit B4±tO5�19q�_ WITNESS our hand(s) this day of PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES, L L.C., a California limited liability company By: OPPORTUNITY CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P. a California limited partnership De Managing Member Q� By: OFFICE OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION I? a C-10 is corporation G 6ersl P ner �p /) t712� By: u C (mac/° c ✓ C/�jt \ . Name:_ Title::. By: �►/—"1�L"v— Name:+tt,.. rll.rti Title:_ L W Page 4 of 5 3p• szvw E 20.12EXHIBIT B 1 I s<i' PusLK: STORM DRAINAGE EASEMP.NT O I I � M w °1 O a �-- , B Imo► 3 � I BOOK 244 PAGE 42 11 f' ACROSS W r APN 288-04-011 do 015 1875 S. BASCOM AVENUc (n PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES, L.P., a California limited partnership $I �' � apFESS/p Q I • W��O ', i a1 r P.O.s. I / _�_- --t r- -- MST P, mo.e1' 13+00 —� 12:00_ WEST 11+00 10►00 „ 1 CAMPBELL AVENUE �T EASEMENT TO BE GRANTED TO THE CITY OF CAMPBELL INFORMATION PLAT BASED ON RECORD DATA (OK 244 P 42) F Nt Ism A Or. LINO�NrI - boftoMJwapN/71 • 9 11 9 O L T I N S I N O I N 9 9 1 0 (IN)rN-71IIIII/M (48101011-t M ERR 5 of 5 ACCEPTED ON THIS-3t' day of 4• 101- for arti ort behalf of the City of Campbell, a 1 UII I AI Corporation, of the State of -+likrii3, pursuvt to Resolution No. 749, recur' )d in Book 4509 — Page 180 Santa Clara C^,v'v R-.coris. Anne Bybee, City Clerk City of Campbell, California R—dintRequested by ) DOCUMENT: 13496771 Titles I / Pages 7 CITY OF CAMPBELI • No Fees Taxes )flJ111111111 When Recorded Mail TO Copies AMT PAID City Clerk ) BRENDA DAVIS RDE a 002 City of Campbell ) SANTA CLARA COUNTY RECORDER 10/25/1996 70 North First Street ) Recorded at the request of 2 58 PM Campbell, CA 95008 ) city (Space Above Thu Lane For Recorder', Use) GRANT DEED FOR PUBLIC STREET PURPOSES FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby aclmo-red4jed, PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES, LLC hereby GRANT(s) to the City otCa°mp&e9�ifuuronie¢a�imiI�r�]ity_ clan Cam. State of California, for public meet and related purposes, are of that certain real property within amid City and more particularly described as fotbws: SEE EXEIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF Said properties are generally shown on the attached Plat Maps B and C. SEE ATTACHED SIGNATURE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF c ,/- rn—Z—, On before me. the uaft%acd. a Notary Public in and for said Setae, pawo&Uy appeared persotttlly (mown , In m, (or proved to me on Poe basis of udaEactoty eridsacaI to be the persoojs) whose rmmeo is/re) subscribed to the within instrument and acksowiedged to = that be/she4gV executed the same in hiWcd 4kosmhaired capac4lid), and tbw by his/her/ W monUffeW on the imaumem the persgW, or On entity upon behalf of which the persoaU acted, exacted the instrument. WRNESS my hand and official seal. sign".. T i'L— L/ zj Name-- An..h�,. (tYPed or gritted) j:\fmmalgrastpsp SIGNATURE _ ItAYIEFN W. gtMN m1010apg r ! Notay Abk — Cassese,, ` SAN 1AAt60 GOUW MY Caraa. Gpaea MAY f 1.1 Page 1 of 6 Thu area for official notarial seal. PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., a California limited liability company By: OPPORTUNITY CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P. a California limited partnership Managing Member By: OFFICE OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION a California corporation Gen er By: _ Name: C J Title: �thrG✓. , ✓ 6G0 Pr7E By: d rt- Name: �2. JNcyy.J Mwrw Title: c Fp M7of6 EXHIBIT A A portion of that certain parcel of land shown on that certain Record of Survey recorded November 14, 1969 in Book 244 of Maps, at page 42, Santa Clan County Records, and being more partic-.!Irly described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeast corner of the parcel of land as hereinabove described; ` THENCE along the easterly line of said parcel of land, and the westerly line of South Bascom Avenue, South 925.81 feet; THENCE along a tangent curve to the right with a radius of 50.00 feet through a central angle of 90°00'00" for an arc distance of 78.54 feet to a point on the northerly line of Campbell Avenue; THENCE along the northerly line of Campbell Avenue, West 156.96 feet to a point on the northerly line of Campbell Avenue; THENCE along the northerly line of said strip of land, North 87°09'45" East 162.92 feet; THENCE along a tangent curve to the left with a radius of 42.00 feet through a central angle of 53°43'08" for an arc distance of 39.38 feet, to a point on the westerly line of said strip of land, a radial at which point bears North 56°33'23" West; THENCE along said westerly line, North 948.97 feet to the northerly line of said parcel of land hereinabove described; THENCE along said northerly line, South 89°52'00" East 11.00 feet to the said POINT OF BEGINNING of this description. Containing an area of 0.260 acres, more or less. Said property is generally shown the attached Exhibit B. PAR .0 A portion of that certa' , parcel of land shown on that certain Record of Survey recorded November 14, 1O'8 in Book 244 of Maps, at page 42, Santa Clan County Records, and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the southwest corner of the parcel of land as hereinabove described; THENCE along the westerly line of said parcel of land, and the easterly line of State Highway 17, along a non -tangent curve to the left, a radial at which point bears North 75°56'14" West, having a radius of 2900.00 feet through a central angle of 00°02'32" an arc distance of 2.06 feet Page 3 of 6 to a line parallel with and distant 2.00 feet northerly from the northerly line line of Campbell Avenue; THENCE along said parallel line, South 90°00'00" East 294.46 feet; THENCE South 00°00'00" West 2.00 feet to the northerly line of Campbell Avenue; THENCE along northerly line of Campbell Avenue, North 90°00'0C" West 294.96 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of this description. Containing an area of 0.014 acres, more or less. Said property is generally shown on the attached Exhibit C. WITNESS our hand(s) this day ofr PRUNEYARD ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., a California limited liability company By: OPPORTUNITY CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P. a California limited partnership Managing Member PdF ESS/0,, By: OFFICE OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION a California corporation Getter er 31 By: Name: Title: E By: TName: f2 - Mo+t Ha..+ ma f s, . Title: L Fp Page 4 of 6 EXHIBIT B 5e9• 52 W E P.O.D. o 1 1.00' � f ESS/ �y 8 c� 58' r T 47— errlc`Eo��.` 1 PARCEL 'A' ^ — LAM TO e,E Q/WTEp o" ni COWAr W 0.2eo AC a a p A W g BOOK 244 PAGE 42 z ACROSS j APN 288-04-24. Q 1875 S. BASCOM AVENUE :2 PRJNEYARD ASSOCIATES, L.P. O a California limited partnership 0 GROSS AREA - 27.243 AC f REMAINDER AREA - 26.969 AC f 00 , EXHIBIT A - 0.260 AC f •�,�. ~ EXHIBIT B - 0.014 AC f g TOTAL AREA - 0.274 AC t o - 93.43'Oe• ?`�'F O R . 42.00' N L w 39.3e' Ne7.09149 E 10t.U' wEsr I "."I A . 90.00W CAMPBELL AVENUE R L 3+00 1 2+00 4-1WEST 1+00 LAND TO BE GRANTED TO THE CITY OF CAMPBELL INFORMATION PLAT BASED ON RECORD DATA (BK 244 P 42) M1 'w Jwn131 r. CAin 7-- likuwag NQ e g r s r t f 1 r• t r r 1 r c t r c (4=)4M-?M/►AX (�A}w-I tea �, __ __ aqt 5 of 6 EXHIBIT C I pFESS � A 0 3 I I I r I BOOK 244 PAGE 42 W I ACROSS APN 283-04-011 do 015 ` 1875 S. BASCOM AVENUE (n I PRUNEYARD .ASSOCIATES, L.P., I a California limited partnership f GROSS AREA — 27.243 AC f REMAINDER AREA — 26.969 AC f I I EXHIBIT A — 0.260 AC f / EXHIBIT B — O.t,14 AC f TOTAL AREA — 0.274 AC f SOUTH Ir PARCEL 'Er LAND TO of GRANTM �::tU+700 C,ONTAM OA14 AC f_oo wEsr ,,.00 ,o.00 — T CAMPBELL AVENUE LAND TO BE GRANTED TO THE CITY OF CAMPBELL INFORMATION PLAT BASED ON RECORD DATA (BK 244 P 42) r. AOr * �aaM rr, M"w rrrt or. Uft ,ro ORnAM S^ jpw CA 0131 Imam rqr 6 of 6 r r r c r a, i r r c r r i■ c c r s (��'ypA/rAa (�?eF„w AA�� 6r, rc6 ACCEPTED ON THIS1114 day of 94 1 for a,! nn hihal of the City of Campbell, a Vu- -i " C-rporation, of the State of C-lifcriii, c rurt to Resolution No. 749, recorded in Book 4503— Pxee ISO Santa Clara i County Records. / Anne Bybee, City Clerk City of Campbell, California ,.. Fitt )875- S Basro. 3a F r f Dvmci Camp' W A preliminary scope of work for an Engineer's report to determine the cost and feasibility of extending Campisi Way to a cul-de-sac ending at the northwesterly corner of the should include the following: Pruneyard jltilities Determine the location of existing underground util ties and evaluate relocation options and preliminary costs. (Include all utilities such as gas mains and meters, electric mains and meters, storm, sanitary mains, laterals, and cleanouts, wate phone.) r mains and meters, cable. and Determine the location of existing overhead utilities and evaluate relocation options and Preliminary costs. Can the major PGE overhead lines be relocated? Determine the need for future utilities, evaluate Icr_ation options, and preliminary costs. (Include new storm systems, fire hydrants, and extension of street lighting facilities.) Prepare topography of existing area and review the grading and drainage. Propose preliminary grading and drainage solutions for proposed improvements and adjacent areas, Street Improvements Investigate the limits of the former landfill and include necessary design implications in preliminary cost estimates for construction of new improvements. Roadway construction in this area will need to be similar to the construction of the other portions the former landof Campisi Way on fill. Estimate the construction costs for the public improvements based on City Standards, and considering special construction requirements for landfill areas. Improvements should include all City Standard street improvements such as storm drainage, street lighting, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, traffic signing and striping. Estimate the costs for demolition of existing improvements, including parking garages and include and any special requirements. (Asbestos in existing buildings, plugging of any existing utilities, etc.) land A Q=11M Estimate the costs for land acquisition (including potential for severance damages for partial acquisitions) and mud i fications/improvements necessary to existing buildings to remain to accommodate new roadway and setbacks (ie, screening, fences, etc.). Estimate the costs for reconstruction/relocating the existing parking structures and facilities as needed, including any easements necessary for the new parking arrangement. 1:\MQ\CAMPI Sk-Vf 0410t tw 4- 1"1. of tie q 0. " �" ei "'"ri°"� tL�+ Nasis ttt✓t' +e AOL nr _ .At tea si bd 1~1 °v tl+a. Wi eL% -h rw r c« Pmpos.�_ c -tUL &kA4,L Ca.�tsi . L11 hat d u^rx rMn+�b e ti �Fk r. Slu„Qd I P t� teed a«d iau�rn�. l A preliminary scope of work for an Engineer's report to determine the cost and feasibility of c` 6TJ extending Campisi Way to a cul-de-sac ending at the northwesterly corner of the Pruneyard rl 'fk. should include the following: 46 Shut Utilities or Sheer Determine the location of existing underground utilities and evaluate relocation options and `1 preliminary costs. (Include all utilities such as gas mains and meters, electric mains and a=e�k,0. meters, storm, sanitary mains, laterals, and cleanouts, water mains and meters, cable, and PeJcs phone.) Determine the location of existing overhead utilities and evaluate relocation options and preliminary costs. Can the major PGE overhead lines be relocated? Determine the need for future utilities, evaluate location options, and preliminary costs. (Include new storm systems, fire hydrants, and extension of street lighting facilities.) Grading and Drainage Prepare topography of existing area and review the grading and drainage. Propose preliminary grading and drainage solutions for proposed improvements and adjacent areas. Street Improvements Investigate the limits of the former landfill and include necessary design implications in preliminary cost estimates for construction of new improvements. Roadway construction in this area will need to be similar to the construction of the other portions of Campisi Way on the former landfill. Estimate the construction costs for the public improvements based on City Standards, and considering special construction requirements for landfill areas. Improvements should include all City Standard street improvements such as storm drainage, street lighting, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, traffic signing and striping. H(�) Estimate the costs for demolition of existing improvements, including parking garages and include and any special requirements. (Asbestos in existing buildings, plugging of any existing utilities, etc.) cb+r P�sev'"" Land Acquisition Cr^ `1 Estimate the costs for land acquisitionlland modifications/improvements necessary to existing buildings to remain to accommodate new roadway and setbacks (ie, screening, fences, etc.). a.i;.. Rw(,+th Estimate the costs for reconstruction/reloczting the existing parking structures, as needed, including any easements necessary for the new parking arrangement. its I CITY of CAMPBELL Community Development Department - Current Planning November 8, 1994 Mr, Jack Bono Asset Management 651 Gateway Boulevard, Suite 980 South San Francisco, CA 94080 Re: Landscaping Proposal — Pruneyard Towers —1901 & 1999 S. Bascom Ave Dear Mr. Bonno: The Planning Department has reviewed your preliminary landscaping submittal which proposes the introduction of tree wells throughout the parking areas of the office towers at the Pruneyard. In that this proposed p would reduce the amount of on -site parking currently provided, the decision for the approval of this plan must rest with the Planning Commission The application for processing such a request would be a Modification to the previous Site & Architectural approval that allowed the construction of she Pruneyard Towers. Staff has reviewed the preliminary plan and is offering the following suggestions for modifications: 1. That the proposed driveway opening around the courtyard be aligned with the existing driveway circulation pattern. 2 That the finger islands toward the interior of the courtyard area be eliminated. 3. That a decorative pavement treatment be extended across the driveway opening in the planter area which frames the courtyard area. ( That the planter areas proposed adjacent to the unit pavement area be reduced in size to provide additional parking. These planter areas should still maintain a symmetry with the proposed unit paver area. 70 North First Street C+mphell, C.10-i s 95008 1423 ni 408 866 2140 — 408. 379. 2372 mo 408 866 2790 Mr. Jack Bono Re: Pruneyard Page 2 5. That the loading areas be designated as limited time parking and striped with parking spaces. 6. That a planter area be prn : ided along the northerly property line. 7. That you investigate the future installation of sidewalks along E. Campbell Avenue and the impact on the proposed parking layout. 8.That the Creek Trail access area at the northwest corner of the site be betty defined. 9. That the tree sizes be increased from 15 gallon to 24-inch box. 10. That adjustments be made in some of the parking areas to reduce excessive backup distance. If you should have any question regarding the above items or the review process, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at (408) 866.2144. Sincerely, Tim J. Haley Associate Planner co Steve Piasecki, Community Development Director Darryl M. Jones, Senior Planner Notes to File Ta File FROM Tim Haley, Associate Planner SUBJECT: landscape Plan(Pruneyard) DATE November 3, 19% The landscape plan submittal should be modified to address the following issues: 1)Align opening in planting area around courtyard area with the existing aisle 2)EEminate finger islands into interior of the courtyard area 3)Extend decorative paving into the opening of the planting area 4)Reduce the size of planter areas adjacent to unit paver area while still maintaining a balanced layout 5) Designate loading zone parkirg for limited times 6)Provide landscaping along the northerly property 7)lnvestigate installation of a sidewalk along E. Campbell Ave. a8)lmprove the definition of the Creek Trail access *7 From: SteveP Date: 11/7/94 To: Times SteveP cc: Darry1J Subject: Re: Pruneyard Meeting (Towers) I arranged a meeting with Jack Bono to discuss our review of the changes in landscaping for the office towers. The meeting is scheduled for 11/9/94 at 9:00am. Are you interested in attending? I have a conflicting meeting and don't need to be at the meeting with Jack Bono. However, please sake sure you have a process for the staff to approve a further reduction in an already parking deficient center and get the concurrence from Bill S. on the mechanism prior to your meetinq Wednesday. I don't want us to step beyond our authority and don't want William Wilson coming back with the expectation that they can have uses up to the pre-existing parking count because we approved the reduction. We may be able to get beyond this with an agreement or some other form of disclosure. On the issue of authority, we may be able to base our approval on the percent of the reduction on base of parking yield. Me need to document what that base is to sake this arqument. Secondly, ensure there are no abnormalities with the site plan such as unusually excessive backup area, planters out of symmetry etc. Third, I want to ensure we retain the shade tree variety (Raywood Ash?) and try to qet the Pruneyard to install a larger than 15 qal tree, if possible. I would prefer 24-inch box to get a more immediate impact of the landscaping. If this is not possible we would have to back off since we have no standard. Please keep me informed of the authority mechanism, site plan details and tree type. ITEM NO. 7 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 8, 1990 PM 90-15 Public Hearing to consider the application of Mr. Fred Sahadi, F. Sahadi for approval of a Tentative Parcel Map allowing the creation of 4 parcels for property located at 1875 South Bascom, in a C-2-S and C-2-0 (General Commercial) Zoning District. ;z That the Planning Commission take the following action: 1. ADOPT THE ATTACHED findings and approve the Tentative Parcel Map, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. • Environmental Review: This project is Categorically Exempt from the environmental review process, hence no environmental action is necessary. APPLICANTS PROPOSA►. The applicant seeks approval to subdivide the existing Pruneyard and Towers Center, including the Pruneyard Inn, into four parcels. The purpose of the subdivision is to create legal lots that correspond to parcels that have been used in the past as security for loans. PROTECT DATA Existing Parcel Gross Lot Area: 1,258,012 sq. ft. Gross Acres: 28.88 Net Lot Area: 1,193,544 Net Acres: 27.24 Proposed Subdivision Parcel Parcel Parcel Parcel (Pruneyard (Pruneyard (Towers 1) (Towers 11) Inn) Center) Gross Lot Area: 74,052 847,678 205,168 129,435 Gross Acres: 1.7 19.46 4.71 2.97 Net Lot Area: 74,052 797,148 205,168 118,047 i 6. The surfacing and lighting of off-street parking facilities a. Considerations relating to landseapings 1. The location, height and Material of Walls, fences, hedges and screen plantings to insure harmony With adjacent development or to conceal storage areas, utility installations or other unsightly davelopswnts 2. The planting of ground CCver or other surfacing to prevent dust and erosions 3. The unnecessary destruction of existing healthy trees. C. Considerations relating to buildings and site lay- out: 1. Consideration of the general silhouette and CGIA- including plant Coverage, iCoverage, all in relationship eielevations dto the neighborhoods 2. Consideration of exterior design in relation to adjoining structures in height, bulk and area openings. breaks in the facade facing on the street, line and pitch of roof, and arrangement of structures on the parcel. Md. 1627 Sl(part), 1906). 21.42.060 Ac On b lannin director. The planning director may rev ew an ee * app eat ons for architec- tural and siteapproval for single-family, two-family and one story, three-family dwellings and their accessory build- ings. No may also review and decide applications for Minor additions or alterations to existing buildings and minor .hang*$ in plans which have previously been approved by the planning commission. Minor changes are limited to Mod fiea- tion in the plot plan and elevations that will rot Change the overall character of the proposed development. Nowev*r, if the planning director finds that the pro- posed development will have a substantial effect on the sur- rounding area or is of sufficient size to warrant the con- sideration of the planning commission, he shall refer the game maner as all other a application to the architectural review coemittee for pro- ppl architfor esinctural and sitenapproval. ford. 1617if1(ip`rt), 1f66). 21.42.070 Action by planningCoasnisai D. The plane nq eommsas on a a o a public *ar ng and decide all applications for site and architectural approval (except as provided in section 21.62.0601 within sixty days of the date of acceptance of the application, Unless the appllCa- tion is continued with the concurrence of the applicant, in which case the sixty day period May be exceeded. The bear- ing shall be noticed as prescribed in Chapter 21.79, public Hearing Notice Procedures. Prior to the public hearing the 405 (Campbell 2/89) 2 0.040--21.50.050 21.50.040 Off-street loadin s ace. A. Off-street loading spaces s a e provide in amounts and locations required by the planning comission. Loading space shall be sufficient to accomodate the largest vehicle which may be used for loading on the premises. B. The planning commission shall have authority to adjust these requirements for a specific use at a specific location to require either a greater or lesser number of parking spaces or a change in other standards of this chap- ter when it determines that circumstances are such as to warrant an adjustment. For all uses not specified in this section, parking spaces shall be provided as required by the planning commission. (Ord. 1617 51(part), 1986). 21.50.050 Parkin schedule. Following is the parking schedu a or t o city o Campbell: PARKING SCHEDULE USE PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS Single-family 2 spaces/unit, one of which must be covered. Duplex 2 spaces/unit, one of which must be covered. Townhomes/Condominiums One -bedroom units 3 spaces/unit, one of which must be covered. Two or more bedroom 31/2 spaces/unit, one of units which must be covered. Multiple Family One bedroom unit V/2 spaces/unit, one of which must be coverer:. Two or more bedroom 2 spaces/unit, one of units which must be covered. In addition to parking required above, a desig- nated guest parking spr.ce shall be provided for each 5 units or fraction there- of. 425 (Campbell 3/93) Staff Report Pm 90-15 2 January 8, 1991 Net Acres: 1.7 18.30 L54 2.71 Parking Required 138 2,019 509 Provided 112 386 308 l� BACKGROUND In September 1990, Mr Fred Sahadi, owner of the Pruneyard Center, initiated a parcel map application which included two parcels without direct public street access. The Subdivision Ordinance in affect at the time did not permit subdivision of parcels withou• public street access unless the project was within a Planned Development zoning district. Mr. Sahadi, not wanting to place the entire center under a PD zone, requested a revision to the Subdivision Ordinance which would permit parcel maps without street frontage. In December 1990, the Council passed a revised Ordinance adding Section 21.16.035 to the Campbell Municipal Code allowing, under certain circumstances, a subdivision which creates lots which do not have frontage of a public street. A. General Plan Designation: This site is currently designated for Commercial uses on the City's General Plan. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan. Zoning Designation: The site is zoned for C-2-S and C-2-0 (General Commercial). Under the existing Subdivision Ordinance, subdivisions which creates lots which do not have frontage on a public street are allowed provided certain requirements are met. Conditions for approval, attached herein, specify requirements necessary for this proposal to comply with the subdivision ordinance. Major Issues A. Street Improvements Subdivision of property may add to the number of property owners and can make it more difficult to obtain street improvements in the future. Staff has suggested as a condition of approval a requirement that existing and future property owners agree to join an assessment district to ensure provi!ion of future street improvements. Coordinated Planning Multiple property owners can complicate coordination of maintenance and future development of the center. Some of the problems with Staff Report Pm 90-15 3 January 8,1991 coordination can be mitigated through the use of easements and covenants. As a condition of approval, staff has included easements and covenants covering utilities, vehicular and pedestrian access and landscaping. Furthermore, a property owner's association is to be established for the joint maintenance of reciprocal rights of way and perimeter landscape areas. C. Parking The subdivision ordinance requires that each parcel be self sufficient in terms of parking unless off -site parking is assured through permanent parking easements. The table below shows parking for each parcel: Existing Code Shortfall Parcel 119 138 <26> Parcel 903 2,019 <1,116> Parcel 538 541 <3> Parcel 289 509 <220> Total 1,849 3,207 <1,358> Less shared parking for theater 479 Revised shortfall <879> The shortfall in parking can be partially attributed to changes in the parking requirements since the Center was built. To compensate for the lack of sufficient parking on each parcel, the applicant is required to record a deed restriction providing reciprocal parking easements between the parcels. Because the existing parking situation had been previously approved by the City no additional requirements, other than the easements, are proposed. However, Conditions of Approval requires that a parking study be provided in conjunction with any Nture requests for expansion of the Center. D. Futwe Expansion To coordinate future expansion, Conditions of Approval requires that prior to any renovations or expansion in excess of 10,000, the site be rezoned Planned Development and that a Master Plan be designed for the Center. The subdivision ordinance permits subdivisions that create parcels without direct public street access when provisions for traffic, parking, utilities, improvements and maintenance are assured through recorded easements or covenants. The ordinance is limited to centers of 20 acres or more, limiting the potential for further parcelization of this site. Conditions of Approval from the Public Works Department and the Fire Department were not