The URL can be used to link to this page

SA 84-51, SA 86-02CITY OF CAMPBELL 2091 S. BASCOM AVE. SA 84-51/86-02 ,_ -;? F a~:� 2091 S- BASCOM AVE. Play It Again Video �� Ra bid 11) el*A ITEM NO. 9 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 11, 1986 SA 86-02 Continued appeal of Planning Director's Play It Again Video denial of sign application for "Play It Again Video" on property known as 2091 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. STAFF RECOMMENDATTON 1. That the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and uphold the decision of the Planning Director denying the applicant's signing request. 2. If approved, subject to the following condition: 1. Applicant to obtain any necessary building permits. This matter was continued from the previous Planning Commission meeting of January 28, 1986 at the request of the applicant. A copy of the previous Staff Comment Sheet is attached for the Commission's review. i ITEM NO. 12 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 28, 1986 SA 86-02 Appeal of Planning Director's denial Play It Again Video of sign application for "Play It Again Video" on property known as 2091 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General rnmmercial) Zoning District. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. That the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and uphold the decision of the Planning Director denying the applicant's signing request. 2. If approved, subject to the following condition: 1. Applicant to obtain any nece-sary building permits. .'.TAFF DISCUSSION The applicant is appealing the decision of the Planning Director which denied his signing request to add an additional sign to an existing freestanding sign. The Planning Director denied the applicant's sign request on the basis that the proposed sign was not consistent in arrangement with other approved signing at this commercial center. The letter denying the applicant's signing request, and the letter of appeal, are attached for the Commission's review. Staff, additionally, has been advised that the Publi- works Department expresses a concern renardina any expansijn of this freestanding sign towards the street right-of-way which would decrease vehicular visibility. The Public works Staff has a particular concern at this location, in that the parking lane along this portion of Bascom Ave. wil' be eliminated in conjunction with the office development just south of this property. The requested sign has been erected at this time. / 40 /RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FILE NO: SA P6-02 /r APPLICANT: LIVINGOOD, J. PLAY IT AGAIN VIDEO SITE. ADDRESS: 2091 S. BASCOM AVE. P.C. MTG. 1-28-86 1. The requested sign addition adds an element to the freestanding sign which is not of the same design or arrangement as other signs in this c.Mmercial center. 2. The proposed addition decreases the sight visibility of vehicles leaV ing this property. 3. That the proposed sign addition does not improve the visual quality of the City. ,CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 N O R T H F I R S T S T R E E T CAMP BEL L, CALIFORNIA 95008 (4081 8 6 6 - 2 t 00 Department'. Planning January 6, 1986 Mr. Jack Livingood, President Aa EC, Inc. 6044 Indian Ave. San Jose, CA 95123 RE: SP. 86-02 - 2091 S. Bascom Ave. "Play 't Again Same" Video Dear mr. Livingood: Please be advised that the Planning Director has denied your signing request to attach a three -sided sign reading "Video" to the existing freestanding sign on the referenced property. This signing request has been denied because it is the Planning Director's opinion tnat the proposal is not of the same design as the other signing panels on this freestanding sign. The Planning Director expressed the following concerts: 1. The relationship of the size of the r.Pw sign panels and the existing panels on the freestanding sign is not consistent. 2. The use of a vertical display or arrangement, rather than horizontal, is not consistent with the other signage at this location. 3. The depth of the sign cabinet is different. 4. The video b•ziness is identified five times on the freestanding sign, whereas the majority of businesses at this location only have two sign faces. Section 21.68,090(4)(D) indicates that individual signs for occilpants in the same building or shopping center shall be of the same design insofar as possible. If you should wish to appeal this decision, please do so pursuant to Section 21.68.130 which is attached for your information. IF you have any questions regarding this information, please contact the Planning Office at 866-2140. Sincerely, ARTILIP. A. LEE PLANNING DDI/RECTOR TMHALEY -1-'L PLANNER II id �IIOND V. TEL. CASLO RRENCe DAILv � FRED w. ERBiNO.J RONALD M. BE"" R Ir CASTELLO, DAILY & CTERHINO ATTORNEY$ AT LAw A PROfEl910 NAL A190CIATION iID0 11 CME9TEP BLVO. ,i CAMPBEL L. CA 9500E-1199 January 15, 1986 Mr. Arthur A. Kee Planning Director Planning Department City of Campbell 70 North First Street Campbell, CA 95008 RE: Notice of Appeal SF. 86-02 "Play It Again Same" Video Dear Mr. Kee: C"'y p/ CAMPOCLL PLANNING O&PAaTMENT Kindly be informed that I have recently been contacted by and have agreed to represent Mr. Jack Livingood, the President of *•GMEC, Inc., with reference to the above -captioned matter. Mr. Livingood has authorized me, on his behalf, to appeal the decision of Mr. Tim Haley in a letter dated January 6, 1986 in which Mr. '-ivingood's request for a sign permit for his business known as "Play It Again Same" Video was denied. Please accept this letter as our Notice of Appeal of that decision. The reasons for our appeal are the following: 1. The sign as proposed by the appellant is of similar size (length and width) proportion, materials and color as the associated building and the other structures in the surrounding area as required by S21.68.090 entitled "Permanent Signs -General". 2. The vertical display or arrangement of the Appellant's sign is again generally of the same size, color, materials and proportion of the other signs, even though they are horizontal. It is Appellant's contention that because of the similarity in those areas his sign does fall within the "same design insofar as possible" as provided for in S21.68.090(4)(D). There is no requirement within that Section that the signs be identical as opposed to similar. There is also nothing within itI at Section that specifies that signs must be either horizontal or vertical and the Planner's interpretation or reading into that ordinance of that requirement constitutes error which forms the basis of this appeal. /r. Arthur A. Kee RE: SA 86-02 - "Play It Again Same" Video January 16, 1986 3. The depth of the siqn cabinet between Appellant's proposed sign and the other signs of related businesses is minimal and, as such, does come within the provisions of that Section which allows some latitude in discrepancies because of the words "insofar as possible". Agair, there is no requirement within tee sign ordinance that each individual sign be exactly the same or identical. 4. Although the video business is identified five times on the sign, whereas the majority of businesses have only two sign faces, Appellant is willing to remove two of his sign displays which would make the difference between the Appellant's business and the remaining businesses negligible and as such to come within the spirit and intent of the sign ordinance. I S. There ha- been and is no objection to the Appellant's sign from the other businesses whic5 are located within the proposed commercial site and the economic livelihood of Appellant's business has been and is directly connected and linked to Appellant's proposed sign display. The Planner, Mr. Haley, d..d not take any of those two cc:siderations mentioned in this sub -paragraph into his co,,sideration in making his adverse determination and such failure also constitutes er_or on his part. I Wherefore, for all of the above reasons, I respectfully request, on behalf of Mr. Livingood and the above -named business, a hearing be- forethe Planning Commission of the City of Campbell to appeal this previously mentioned decision. I would also appreciate your notifying me and Mr. Livingood directly of the time when this matter will be considered on the next Planning Commission agenda. Thank you very much. TJD:ld cc: Jack Livingood very truly yours, TERRENCE J. DAILY t • �� A , ;CHANT t Gs.B N`f `A•E TRH E� TCN�1 u7 fir, e :v ,&r,.4? .:` tit .#_ '- •4!; : p' TF.-'AN7 1 � l�nlAn/T 00 TAIAA. I N ". r4, sir aAr d 44 *'ai I1��■ ■ �� iuumuiidl� �� law' �� PI.ANIIING COMMISSION JANUARY 28, 1986 SA 86-02 Play It Again Video M/S: Perrine, Christ - Appeal of Planning Director's denial of sign application for "Play It Again Video" on property known as 2091 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. That SA 86-02 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of February 11, 1986 at the applicant's request. Motion carried unanimously (6--0-0). PIM ITEM NO. 12 1 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMMISSION MEET-Ni OF JANUARY 28, 1986 SA 86-02 Appeal of Planning Director's denial Play It Again Video of sign application for "Play It Again Video" on property known as 2091 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. That the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and uphold the decision of the Planning Director denying the applicant's signing request. 2. If approved, subject to the following condition: 1. Applicant to obtain any necessary building permits. The applicant is appealing the decision of the Planning Director which denied his signing request to add an additional sign to at. existing freestanding sign. The Planning Director denied the applicant's sign request on the basis that the proposed sign was not consistent in arrangement with other approved signing at this commercial center. The letter denying the applicant's signing request, and the letter of appeal, are attached for the Commission's review. Staff, additionally, has been advised that the Public Works Department expresses a concern regardinq ary ex--nsion of this freestanding sign towards the street right-of-way whici. would decrease vehicular visibility. The Public works Staff has a particular concern at this location, in that the parking lane along this portion of Bascom Ave. will be eliminated in conjunction with the office development just south of this property. The requested sign has been erected at this time. RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FILE NO: SA 86-02 APPLICANT: LIVINGOOD, J. PLAY IT AGAIN VIDEO SITE ADDRESS: 2091 S. BASCOM AVE. P.C. MTG. 1-28-86 1. The requested sign addition adds an element to the freestanding sign which is not of the same design or arrangement as other signs in this commercial center. 2. The proposed addition decreases the sight visibility of vehicles leaving this property. 3. That the proposed sign addition does not improve the visual quality of the City. . "4V . ■ CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAMP BELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 866-2100 Department: Planning January 6, 1986 Mr. Jack Livingood, President AGNIEC, Inc. 6044 Indiai Ave. San Jose, CA 95123 RE: SA 86-02 - 2091 S. Bascom Ave. "Play It Again Same" Video Dear Mr. Livingood: Please be advised that the Planning Director nas denied your signing request to attach a three -sided sign reading "Video" to the existing freestanding sign on the referenced property. This signing request has been denied because it is the Planning Director's opinion that the proposal is not of the same design as the other signing panels on this freestanding sign. The Planning Director expressed the following concerns: 1. The relationship of the size of the new sign panels and the existing panels on the freestanding sign is not consistent. 2. The use of a vertical display or arrangement, rather than horizontal, is not consistent with the other signage at this location. 3. The depth of the sign cabinet. is different. 4. The video business is identified five times on the freestanding sign, whereas the majority of businesses at this location only have ih o sign faces. Section 21.68.090(4)(D) indicates that individual signs for occupants in the same building or shopping center shall be of the same design insofar as possible. If you sl, uld wish to appeal this decision, please do so pursuant to Section 21.68.130 which is attached for vour information, If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact the Planning Office at 866-2140. Sincerely, ARTHIJR A. KEE PLAANNING DIRECTOR C Alawy.L TIM HALEY v PLANNER II Id CASTL:..Lo. DAILY St GERBINO ATTORNEYS *T LAW vwOND v. 1^1TELLO A PRO FlBB1.'i.AL AB80C ATION 14091 sae -eels J. _Lv TCRR ENC[ PRED W. GE—N.,JR. 1700 WINCHESTER BLVD. !1 RONALD M. BE ... N CAMPBELL, CA 9500E-II08 January 15, 1986 [Vn/ MOVE 1I?� Mr. Arthur A. Kee In( u v lS O 1%M E D Planning Director u Planning Department JAN IC 198p City of Campbell 70 North First Street 0 17Y or CAIMPOCLL Campbell, CA 95008 PLANNING MWAnrMCNT RE: Notice of Appeal SA 86-02 "Play It Again Same" Video Dear Mr. Kee: Kindly be informed that I have recently been contacted by and have agreed to represent Mr. Jack Livingood, the President of AGMEC, Inc., with reference to the above -captioned matter. Mr. Livingood has authorized me, on his behalf, to appeal the decision of Mr. Tim Haley in a letter dated January 6, 1986 in which Mr. Livingood's request for a sign permit for his business known as "Play It Again Same" Video was denied. Please accept this letter as our Notice of Appeal of that decision. The reasons for our appeal are the following: 1. The sign as proposed by the appellant is of similar size (length and width) proportion, materials and color as the associated building and the other structures in the surrounding area as required by S21.68.090 entitled "Permanent Signs -General". 2. The vertical display or arrangement of the Appellant's sign is again generally of the same size, color, materials and proportion of the other signs, even though they are horizontal. It is Appellant's contention that because of the similarity in those areas his sign does fall within the "same design insofar as possible" as provideo for in S21.68.090(4)(D). There is no requirement within ti:at Section that the signs be identical as opposed to similar. There is also nothing withinin tFa-tSection that specifies that signs must be either horizontal or vertical and the Planner's interpretation or reading into that ordinance of that requirement constitutes error which forms the basis of this appeal. Mr. Arthur A. Kee RE: SA 86-02 - "Play It Again Same" Video January 16, 1986 3. The depth of the sign cabinet between Appellant's proposed sign and the other signs of related businesses is minimal and, as such, does cane within the provisions of that Section which allows some latitude in discrepancies because of the words "insofar as possible". Again, there is no requirement within the sign ordi:ance that each individual sign be exactly the same or identical. 4. Although the video business is identified five times on the sign, whereas the majority of businesses have only two sign faces, Appellant is willing to remove two of his sign displays which would make the difference between the Appellant's business and the remaining businesses negligible and as such to come within the spirit and intent of the sign ordinance. 5. There has been and is no objection to the Appellant's sign from the other businesses which are located within the proposed commercial site and the economic livelihood of Appellant's business has been and is directly connected and linked to Appellant's proposed sign display. The Planner, Mr. Haley, did not take any of those two considerations mentioned in this sub -paragraph into his consideration in making his adverse determination and such failure also constitutes error on his part. Wherefore, for all of the above reasons, I respectfully request, on behalf of Mr. Livingood and the above -named business, a hearing be- fore the Planning Commission of the City of Campbell to appeal this previously mentioned decision. I would also appreciate your notifying me and Mr. Livingood directly of the time when this matter will be considered on the next Planning Commission agenda. Thank you very much. Very truly yours, vV TERRENCE J. DAILY TJD:ld cc: Jack Livingood i 54. r'V'.,\ �R6Q� till�t��b �.ir� I►JT�1l�i'�,I.LY yw .�►Nnra 6v I TENANT I M7 rEti.t�rr i TENANT is � 7ENRnli I � V tl ri T4 i 11■■�■��i1� iuuureiii�li�� PLANNING Ca1MISSIQ4 0 C APRIL 8, 1986 SA 66-02 Continued appeal of Planning Director's Play - Again Video denial of sign application for "Play It Again Video" on property known as 2091 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Mr. tee reported that Staff is recommending a continuance to April 22. 1986, in that Staff is of the understanding that a sign program is forthcoming. Mr. Jack Livingood, 2901 S. Bascom Ave., stated that he has engaged a sign company to provide plans, however, he has no control over when the plans will be ready. Mr. Livingood felt that his appearance before the Couniseion should be eliminated unless the forthcoming plans are denied by the Staff. He noted that he has been working with Mr. Kee toward a resolution of the problem. Mr. Kee indicated that if the subject plans are along the line that has been discussed with the applicant, there may be no need for the issue to con. before the Commission. Staff is recommending a continuance on the basis of information available at the time the Staff Report was written; however, the Commission could also take action to remove ;his item from the agenda if it so desires. M/S* Christ, Fairbanks - That SA 86-02 be removed from the Planning Commission agenda at the applicant's request, based upon the premise that acceptable plans are forthcoming. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). Commissioner Dickson expressed a concern with the illegal signing on the site, and felt that perhaps the item should be kept on the agenda to make sure it is taken care of. R ITEM NO. 9 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 8, 1986 SA 86-02 Continued appeal of Planning Director's Play It Again Video denial of sign application for "Play It Again Video" on property known as 2091 S. Bascom Ave, in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. That the Planning Commission continue consideration of this application to its meeting of April 22, 1986. STAFF DISCUSSION This matter has been continued from the previous Planning Commission meetings of January 28, February 11 and March 25, 1986. This matter vas continued by the Commission at its meeting in January at the request of tl,a applicant, and at its meeting in February upon recommendation of the Site and Architectural Review Committee, so that a revised signing proposal --ould be submitted. This matter was again continued from the Planning Commission meeting of March 25, 1986 so that a revised proposal could be submitted. As of this writing, Staff has not received a revised plan. Staff is of the opinion that the applicant has had ample time, approximately 2 months, -o have submitted a revised proposal for the sl.gning at this location. Consequently, Staff can support only one further -onrinuance of this matter. The requested sign has been erected for approximately 3 months without permits at this time. r / ITEM NO. 12 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 28, 1986 SA 86-02 Appeal of Planning Director's denial Play It Again video of sign application for "Play It Again Video" on property known as 2091 S. B. scnm Ave. in a C-2-S (General Comnerciall Zoninc District. STAFF RECOIMIENDATION 1. That the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and uphold the decision of the Planning Director denying the applicant's signing request. 2. If approved, subject to the following condition: 1. Applicant to obtain any necessary building permits. STAFF DISCUSSION The applicant is appealing the decision of the Plannina Director which denied his signing request to add an additional sign to an existing freestanding sign. The Planning Director denied the applicant's sign renuest on the basis that the proposed sign was not consistent in arrangement with other approved signing at this commercial center. The letter denying the applicant's signing request, and the letter of appeal, are attached for the Commission's review. Staff, additionally, has been advised that the Public works Department expresses a concern regarding any expansion of this freestanding sign towards the street right—f—ay which would decrease vehicular visibility. The Public works Staff has a particular concern at this location, in that the parking lane along this portion of Bascom Ave. will be eliminated in conjunction with the office development just south of this property. The requested sign has t—n erected at this time. 1 ITEM NO. 11 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COK41SSION MEETING OF MARCH 25 1986 -02 \ Continued appeal of P1 ning Director's n, It Again Video denial of sign appli 'ion for "Play It Again Video" on pr er'.y known as 2091 S. Bascom Ave, in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zon g District. STAFF RECWMENDATION That the Planning Commi Son adopt the attached findings and uphold L2. If aphe decision of the Plan ng Directo denying the applicant's signing request. proved, subject to the 11 ing condition: 1. Applicant to obtain necessary building permits. STAFF DISCUSSION This matter has been contin ed from the revious Planning Commission meetings of January 28 and ebruary 11, 1 86. This matter was continued by the Commission at its eting in Januai at the request of the applicant, and at its ting in February on recommendation of the Site and Architectural Revi Committee, so that revised signing proposal could be submitted. As of this writing, taff has not received a r vised plan or adiitional information from t applicant. Consequently, taff is recommending a denial of this si ing request as discussed and upported in the previous Staff Comment Sh t. x x x RECOIL'-0ENDND FINDINGS FILE N0: SA 86-02 APPLICANT: LIVINGOOD, J. PLAY IT AGAIN VIDEO SITE ADDRESS: 2091 S. BASCOM AVE. P.C. MTG. 1-28-86 1. The requested sign addition adds an element to the freestanding sign which is not of the same design or arrangement as other signs in this commercial center. 2. The proposed addition decreases the sight visibility of vehicles leaving this property. 3. That the proposed sign addition does not improve the visual quality of the City. n ,CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 N O R T H F I R S T STREET CAMP SELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408)866-2100 i Department: Plaming January 6, 1986 Mr. Jack Livingood, President AGMEC, Inc. 6044 Indian Ave. San Jose, CA 95123 RE: SA 86-02 - 2091 S. Bascom Ave. "Play It Again Same" Video Dear Mr. Livingood: Please be advised that the Planning Director has denied your signing request to attach a three -sided sign reading "Video" to the existing freestanding sign on the referenced property. This signing request has been denied because it is the Planning Director's opinion that the proposal is not of the same design as the other signing panels on this freestanding sign. The Planning Director expressed the following concerns: 1. The relationship of the size of the new sign panels and the existing panels on the freestanding sign is not consistent. The use of a vertical display or arrangement, rather than horizontal, is not consistent with the other signage at this location. 3. The depth of the sign cabinet is different. 4. The video business is identified five times on the freestanding sign, whereas the majority of businesses at this location only have two sign faces. Section 21.68,090(4)(D) indicates that individual signs for oco grants in the same building or shopping center shall be of the same design insofar as possible. If you should wish to appeal this decision, please do so pursuant to Section 21.68.130 which is attached for your information. If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact the Planning Office at 866-2140. Sincerely, ARTHUR A. KEE PLAIINING DIRECTOR TIM HALEY PLANNER II ld CASTELLO. DAILY & GERBINO ATTORNEYS AT LAW A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION 10 WINCHESTER BLVD. •I CAMPBELL.CA 95008 -IIDB January 15, 1986 Mr. Arthur A. Kee 6 0n D Planning Director UUUiii111 J��, , C Planning Department �98p City of Campbell C(Ty LL 70 North First Street PUNNING OCIEPARTMEC.IET Campbell, CA 95008 PAN RE: Notice of Appeal SA 86-02 "Play It Again Same" Video Dear Mr. Kee: Kindly be informed that I hove recently been contacted by and have agreed to represent Mr. Jack Livinqood, the President of AGMEC, Inc., with reference to the above -captioned matter. Mr. Livingood has authorized me, on his behalf, to appeal the decision of Mr. Tim Haley in a letter dated January 6, 1986 in which Mr. Livingood's request for a sign permit for his business known as "Play It Again Same" Video was denied. Please accept this letter as our Notice of Appeal of that decision. The reasons for our appeal are the following: 1. The sign as proposed by the appellant is of similar size (length and width) proportion, materials and color as the associated building and the other structures in the surrounding area as required by S21.68.090 entitled "Permanent Signs -General". 2. The vertical display or arrangement of the Appellant's sign is again generally of the same size, color, materials and proportion of the other signs, even though they are horizontal. It is Appellant's contention that because of the similarity in those areas his sign does fall within the "same design insofar as possible" as provided for in S21.68.090(4)(D). There is no requirement within that Section that the signs be identical as opposed to similar. There is also nothing within�3lt at Section that specifies that signs must be either horizontal or vertical and the Planner's interpretation or reading into that ordinance of that requirement constitutes error which forms the basis of this appeal. r _ q i ( (0 Mr. Arthur A. Kee RE: SA 86-02 - "Play It Again Same" Video January 16, 1986 3. The depth of the sign cabinet between Appellant's proposed sign and the other siqns of related businesses is minimal and, as such, does come within the provisions of that Section which allows some latitude in discrepancies because of the words "insofar as possible". Again, there is no requirement within the sign ordinance that each individual sign be exactly the same or identical. 4. Although the video business is identified five times on the sign, whereas the majority of businesses have only two sign faces, Appellant is willing to remove two of his sign displays which would make the difference between the Appellant's busine=s and the remaining businesses negligible and as such to come within the spirit and intent of the sign ordinance. 5. There has been and is no objection to the Appellant's sign from the other businesses which are located within the proposed commercial site and the economic livelihood of Aopellant's business has been and is directly connected and linked to Apoellant's oroposed sign display. The Planner, Mr. Haley, did not take any of those two considerations mentioned in this sub -paragraph into his consideration in making his adverse determination and such failure also constitutes error on his part. Wherefore, for all of the above reasons, I respectfully request, on behalf of Mr. Livingood and the above -named business, a hearing be- forethe Planning commission of the City of Campbell to appeal this previously mentioned decision. I would also appreciate your notifying me and Mr. Livingood directly of the time when this matter will be considered on the next Planning commission agenda. Thank you very much.. Very truly yours, TERRENCE J. DAILY TJD:ld cc: Jack Livingood .'1 �Jl9f—1 i7 �O� I I -N 3-ston. office j building 7 v A 9 6 l PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 25, 19P6 R R f SA 86-02 Continued appeal of Planning Director's Play It Again Video denial of sign application for "Play It Again Video" on property known as 2091 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. M/S: Fairbanks, Olszewskl - that SA 86-02 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of April 8, 1986 at the applicant's request. Notion carried with a vote of 6-1-0, with Commissioner Dickson voting "no". f R f ITEM NO. 11 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MARCH 25, 1986 SA 86-02 Continued appeal of Planning Director's Play It Again Video denial of sign application for "Play It Again Video" on property known as 2091 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. That the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and uphold the decision of the Planning Director denying, the applicant's signing request. 2. If approved, subject to the following condition: 1. Applicant to obtain any necessary building permits. STAFF DISCUSSION This matter has been continued from the prevfuus Planning Commission meetings of January 28 and February 11, 1986. This matter was continued by the Commission at its meeting in January at the request of the applicant, and at its meeting in February upon recommendation of the Site and Architectural Review Committee, so that a revised signing proposal could be submitted. As of this writing, Staff has not received a revised plan or additional information from the applicant. Consequently, Staff is recommending a denial of this signing request as discussed and supported in the previous i Staff Comment Sheet. n • x / ITEM NO. 12 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 26, 1986 sA 86-02 Appeal of Planning Director's denial Play It Again Video of sign application for "Play It Again Video" on property known as 2091 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning Distric L. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. That the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and uphold the decision of the Planning Director denying the applicant's signing request. 2. If approved, subject to the following condition: 1. Applicant to obtain any necessary building permits. 3 The applicant is appealing the decision of the Ylanninq Director which denied his signing request to add an additional siqn to an existing ^I freestandinq sign. The Planning Director denied the applicant's sign request on the basis that the proposed sign was not consistent in arrangement with oiler approved signing at this commercial center. The letter denying the applicant's signing request, and the letter of appeal, are attached for the Commission's review. ! Staff, additionally, has been advised that the Public Works Department expresses a concern renardinn any expansion of this freestanding sign towards the street riqht—f-wav which would decrease vehicular visibility. The 'uhlic Work, staff has a particular concern at this location, in that the parking lane along this portion of Bascom Ave. will he eliminated in conjunction with the office development just south of this property. The requested sign has been erected at this time. •ii IiCOMMENDED FINDINGS FILF. NG: SA 86-02 APPLICANT: LIVINGOOD, J. PLAY IT AGAIN VIDEO SITE. ADDRESS: 2091 S. BASCOM AVE. P.C. MTG. 1-28-86 1. The requested sign addition adds an element to the freestanding sign which is not of the same design or arrangement as other signs in this commercial center. 2. The proposed addition decreases the sight visihility of vehicles leaving this property. 3. That the nroposed sign addition does not improve the visual quality of the City. /1TY (IF CAMPBELL 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAM PBELL, CAL IFORNIA 95008 (408) 866-2100 Department Planning January 6, 1986 Mr. Jack Livingood, President Aa EC, Inc. 6044 Indian Ave. San Jose, CA 95123 RE: SA 86-02 - 2091 S. Bascom Ave. "Play It Again Same" Video Dear Mr. Livingood: Please be advised that the Planning Director has denied your signing request to attach a three -sided sign reading "Video" to the existing freestanding sign an the referenced property. This signing request has been denied because it is the Planning Director's opinion that the proposal is not of the same design as the other signing panels on this freestanding sign. The Planning Director expressed the following concerns: 1. The relationship of the size of the new sign panels and the existing panels on the freestanding sign is not consistent. 2. The use of a vertical display or arrangement, rather than horizontal, is not consistent with the other signage at this location. 3. The depth of the sign cabinet is different. 4. The video business is identified five times on the freestanding sign, whereas the majority of businesses at this location only have two sign faces. Section 21.68.090(4)(D) indicates that individual signs for occupants in the same building or shoppi..-,, center shall be of the same design insofar as possible. If you should wish to appeal this decision, please do so pursuant to Section 21.68.130 which is attached for your information. If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact the Planning Office at 866-2140. Sincerely, ARTHUR A. KEE PLANNING DDIIRECTOR d/SIC TIM HALEY PLANNER II Id �M( fit.'. / CASTELLO. DAILY & GERBINO ATTORNEYS AT LAW rM owo Y. CASTELLO+oei eeeeele 1 ♦EwwENC[ �. O• Lr A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION FR ED W. OEwBiN O. JR I790 WINCMESTER BLVD. •I RONALO N. BEAMAN CAMPBELL. CA 9500E IIDB January 15, 1986 Mr. Arthur A. Kee MOVE nD Planing Director UUU UUU Jar,, n� Planning Department 198a City of Campbell 70 North First Street C)ry Cr CAMPOt� Campbell, CA 95008 PLANNINO CWP'taTNI<NT RE: Notice of Appeal SA 86-02 "Play It Again Same" Video Dear Mr. Kee: Kindly be informed that I have recently been contacted by and have agreed to represent Mr. Jack Livinqood, the President of AG.MEC, Inc., with reference to the above -captioned matter. Mr. Livingood has authorized me, on his behalf, to anneal the decision of Mr. Tim Haley in a letter dated January 6, 1986 in which Mr. Livingood's request for a sign permit for his business known as "Play It Again Same" Video was denied. Please accept this letter as our Notice of Appeal of that decision. The reasons for our appeal are the following: 1. The sign as proposed by the appellant is of similar size (length and width) proportion, materials and color as the associated building and the other structures in the surrounding area as required by §21.68.090 entitled "Permanent Signs -General". 2. The vertical display or arrangement of the Appellant's sign is again generally of the same size, color, materials and proportion of the other signs, even though they are horizontal. It is Appellant's contention that because of the similarity in those areas his sign does fall within the "same design insofar as possible" as provided for in 521.68.090(4)(D). There is no requirement within that Section that the signs be identical as opposed to similar. There is also nothing within�tlat Section t'.Iat specifies that signs must be either horizontal or vertical and the Planner's interpretation or reading into that ordinance of that requirement constitutes error which forms the basis of this appeal. /Mr. Arthur A. Kee RE: SA 86-02 - "Play It Again Same" Video January 16, 1986 3. The depth of the sign cabinet between Appellant's proposed sign and the other signs of related businesses is minimal and, as such, does come within the provisions of that Section which allows some• latitude in discrepancies because of the words "insofar as possible". Again, there is no requirement within the sign ordinance that each individual si,i be exactly the same or identical. 4. Although the video business is identified five times on the sign, whereas the majority of businesses have only two sign faces, Appellant is willing to remove two of his sign displays which would make the difference between the Appellant's business and the remaining businesses negligible and as such to come within the spirit and intent of the sign ordinance. S. There has been ar,d is no objection to the Appellant's sign from the other businesses which are located within the proposed commercial site and the economic livelihood of Appellant's business has been and is directly connected and linked to Appellant's proposed sign display. The Planner, Mr. Haley, did not take any of those two considerations mentioned in this sub -paragraph into his consideration in making his adverse determination and such failure also constitutes error on his part. Wherefore, fcr all of the above reasons, I respectfully request, on behalf of Mr. Livingood and the above -named business, a hearing be - on Planning Commission of the City of Campbell to appeal this previously mentioned decision. I would also appreciate your notifying me and Mr. Livingood directly of the time when this matter will be considered on the next Planning Commission agenda. Thank you very much. Very truly yours, p ZA TERRENCE J. DAILY TJD:ld cc: Jack Livingood :r �LNANT 79, "..Aff 'TENAu-r ��,� s - NHS j •:.j'. TEnlA,tlT � i Oft JJF jCljf\ �t '+ ,nnJ ,U111 "11 nll ■ rnE �1 I IIIIIiism 11- I `y( S '&at i .5A 9L-OZ 3-storv•r••:••�••�� f f ice huildinp, J ly 9 i 7 PLAMJING CO IISSION A9110 FEBRUARY 11, 1986 SA 86-02 Continued appleal of Planning Director's Play It Again Viedo denial of sign application for 'Play It Again Video" on property known as 2091 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Perrine reported that this application was considered by the Sits and Archite,tural Review Committee. The Committee met with the applicant and his attorney, and tried to present to them that the Committee would really like to see a new signing proposal, rather than a continuance of the existing one. They indicated that they would approach the other tenants in the building and try to work something out; therefore, a continuance is being recommended. M/S: Olszewski, Perrine - That SA 86-02 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of March 25, 1986 in order that the applicant might work out a signing program with other tenants in the building. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-1). 0 �v_N11� I :Ali - 'G .a nu ° °s i > 0 J rt UL -1 -i c JM l A Am rn 41 4N v x1 J� R,1-2 T ' LJNFINI5PE-D A2eA 577 #i tLq u R t 1 r` Ii�r �o - �es�ir.nxecwgE P.O. BOX 23206 SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95153 (408) 629-7615 1= January 27, 198E Planning Commission RE: Appeal from Planning Directors denial of following Sign permit SA 86-02 -2091 Sp Bascom Ave„ "Play It Again" Video RE: Planning Director Staff meeting: On January 2701986 Mr, Liviagood received a phone call from the office of the Planning Director.. He was informed that there wovild be a staff meeting at 10:00 A.N. January the 28 The meeting to cover the staff recommendation to the Planning Commission regarding the appeall of the denial of a sign extension permit,, The notices was insufficient to allow the appellants Attorney to be present at the staff meeting to protect appellants interest, Therefore, a continuance is requested untill the Planning Commissions meeting in Feburary thereby allowing appleants Attorney to be present at a staff meeting and be heard at that time prior to the Planning Commission meeting. V ry Tjruly urs, Jack C. Llvingood ; f:' 10) CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 NORTH FIRST STREET " AMPS ELL. CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 866.2100 ri Department Planning January 24, 1986 TO: Mr. Jack Livingood Mr. Terrence J. Dailey AGMEC, Inc. Castello, Daily s Gerbino 6044 Indian Ace. 1790 S. Winchester Blvd. San Jose, CA 95123 Campbell, CA 95008 FILE NO: SA 86-02 ADDRESS: 2091 S. Bascom Ave. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Signing appeal - Play It Again Video SITE 6 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW APPOINTMENT: Date: Tuesday, January 28, 1986 Time: 10:00 a.m. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: 7:30 pm, Tuesday, January 28, 1986 Please be advised that the Architectural Review Committee of the Campbell Planning Commission will review your plans for approval of the ,—ve-referenced projezt at the appointment time noted above, in the North Wiry Conference Room, City Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. The Committee Chairman will then make a recommendation at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission which is held at 7:30 p.m. on the above -referenced date, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. A copy of the Staff Comment Sheet and recommendation, as well as the agenda for the Planning Commission meeting, is enclosed for your information. It is necessary that vou, or an authorized representative, be present at said Architectural Review Committee meeting and the Planning Commission meeting. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact .. the Planning Department at 866-2140. Sincerely, ARTHUR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR ld/lj Enclosures _ o CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAMP BELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 866-2100 Department: Planning January 16, 1986 Mr. Terrence Daily Castello, Daily 6 Gerbino 1790 S. Winchester Blvd. N1 Campbell, CA 95008-1198 RE: SA 86-02 2091 S. Bascom Ave. Dear Mr. Daily: The Planning Department is in receipt of your letter of appeal dated January 15, 1986. Pursuant to your request, please be advised that this matter has been scheduled for the Planning Commission meeting of January 28, 1996, at 7:30 p.m. A copy of the staff report for this matter will be sent to you on January 24, 1986. If you should have ar7 questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact the Planning Office. Sincerely, ARTHUR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR v /JTIN J. RAL?Y {- PLANNER II TJR:lj CITY OF CAMPBELL � APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT BUSINESS NAME: ?LAY IT AGAIN YIOEO Date: 12 24 5 ADDRESS OF BUSINESS: 2091 S. Bascom Telephone No. 071-5300 S,, kr 4tv:43 oe OWNER/APPLICANT AGNEC,Inc. Telephone No.: 629-7615 6044 Indian Ave. San Jose Calif.Zip Code iT23 _ SIGN COMPANY NONE _ Telephone No. 699_7615 Zip Code In accordance with Sections 21.68.030 and 21.68.110 of the Municipal Code of the City of Campbell, the undersigned hereby makes application for approval of the attached sign plan and agrees to abide by the Sign Regulations of the City and the conditions of approval for this application. eSignature Applic gna r Prope SA EC- o Z Approved as presented Conditionally approved Denied ARTHUR A. KEE, PLANNING DIRECTOR by TO. CITY CLERK PLEASE COLLECT AND RECEIPT FOR THE FOLLOWING MONIES PLANNING FILE NO.: S - O Z ADDRESS: 2, -pf A ITEM AMOUNT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0-1 acres $1,000.00 1-5 acres 1,300.00 5+ acres 2,000.00 ZONE CHANGE 0-1 acres 900.00 1-5 acres _ 1,000.00 5+ acres _ 1,500.00 TEXT AMENDMENT 400.00 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 0-2 acres 1,000.00 2-5 acres 1,300.00 5+ acres 1.500.00 (Modifications of Approval) 250.00 (Revised Development Schedule) 150.00 USE PERMIT Garage Conversions, Occupancy Requirement w/o Development Plans, Liquor Licenses, Secondary Dwelling Units, Interim Zone 350.00 All Other Use Permits 1,000.00 (Modifications or Amendments) 125.00 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL 0-10.000 s.f. of construction 500.00 10,000-75,000 s.f. of construction 750.00 75,000+ s.f. of construct'on 1.000.00 If no construction associated w/ project 500.00 (Modifications) 125.00 (Extensions of Approval) _ 75.00 VARIANCES Single Family Residence 250.00 All Others _ 430.00 SIGN PERMITS Permits - Minimum of $40 or 1% of estimated valuation 40.00 Penalty for not securing a permit 40.00 OTHER TOTAL $y o F PHONE�2 S —i6 1 ADDRESS fia-Y` r L�at�4it ZIP T s M 2 FOR IPT NO. 2 1 CITY CLERK PAID ,SL p_ O El .a ONLY EAMOUNT IVED BY ICITY OF CAMPBELL 7 0 N O R T H F I R S T S T R E E T CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 ' (408)866-2100 Departmem Planning W11 December 18, 1985 ; NOTICE TO APPEAR FILE NO. CE IN THE MATTER OF: Owner/Manager "Play It Again Video" 2091 S. Bascom Ave - Campbell, CA 95008 TO: Owner/Manager YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that an informal hearing will be held in the Office of the City Attorney, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California on Tuesday, the 31st day of December, 1985, at 2:30 p.m., to consider your alleged violation of Section(s) 21.68.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code, to Wit: Failure to remove unapproved signs YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that you should appear at the above time and place to SHOW CAUSE why a court action should not be filed against you by reason of said alleged violation. You should bring with you any and all records, documents, or other evidence which may establish that said violation does not exist, or that court action should not be brought against you. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Tim Haley at 866-2140. MR. WILLIAM SELIGMANN ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF CAMPBELL 20325 STEVENS CREEK BLVD. f CUPERTINO, CA 95014 Acting City Attor eye 1 Certified/Non-certified / Copies: CA/City Mqr./CE File/ Chron/File Jack Livingood, 3078 Landess Ave., San Jose, CA, 95132 CITY (IF CAMPBELL 70 N O R T H F I R S T STREET CAM PBELL. CALIFORNIA 95008 (408)866-2100 Department: planning November 18, 1985 Manager "Play It Again video" 2091 S. Bascom Ave. Campbell, CA 95008 RE: Erection of signing without permits 2091 S. Bascom Ave. Dear Sir: On June 19, 1985, this office notified you regarding the erection of a canopy sign without permits. You were requested to remove this sign by June 25, 1985. An inspection of this property on November 18, 1985, indicated that this canopy sign has not been removed and that an additional sign has been added to the freestanding sign. Please be advised that within 10 days, on or before November 29, 1985, all unapproved signs must be removed. Failure to comply with this request will result in the referral of this matter to the City Attorney for issuance of a citation. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the Planning Office. Sino_rely, ARTHUR A. KRE PLANNING DIRECTOR TIM J. '1Ih .EY �! PLANNER II TJH:lj u ;gas CITY O 3078 Lan des@LMPF , !3lhN'Jo Ilfornia 95132 (408) 943-0546 � DEPARTMENT June 28,1985 Tim Raley lie. Sign problem Play It Again Video Dear Tim, I want to remove the 8' sign in front of the store, at 2091 S. Bascom. It is not visible from the street. We we would like to replace the existing 8' sign with a 4'-6" sign that reads VIDEO the plastic 4'-611 sign would be visible from S. Bascom. I am opening a new store in Santa Clara so my time has been drasticly curtailed. That is why I have been lax in not contacting you sooner . I will be in after the 4th and hope we can resolve the sign problem. The banner is down so that is not a problem. Thank you for ;*our help in the past and will see you soon. �di6Livingoo y urs Jack It 00 61JI_7G15 ('Irl" (IF (':a1►11'fREEI 70 NORTH FIRST STREET C AMPBEL L. CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 866-2100 Depa,:ment Plannino June 19, 1985 Manager "Play it Again" Video 2091 S. Bascom Ave. Campbell, CA 95008 RE: Erection of signing without permits 2091 S. Bascom Ave. Dear Sir: It has come to the attention of the Planning Department that signage advertising your business has been erected without the benefit of a sign permit. Section 21.68.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code re- quires issuance of a sign permit prior to the erection, creation, altering or location of signing. A review of Planning Department records indicates that two signs have been approved for your business: 1) A canopy sign placed parallel to the northern property line; and 2) A tenant sign which is a portion of the free-standing sign which was constructed for this retail project. An inspection of this property on June 18, 1985, verified a banner sign suspended over the driveway and a canopy sign facing Bascom Ave. Please be advised that within 5 days of receipt of this letter, on or before June 25, 1985, all unapproved signing must be removed. Failure to comply with this request will result in this matter being referred to the City Attorney's office for further abatement. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the Planning Office. Sincerely, ARTHUR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR TIM J. HALEY ✓_ PLANNER II TJH:lj cc: City Attorney Biagio Passaro, 2097 S. Bascom Ave. CITY OF CAMPBELL 75 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 1408) 378-8141 i f Department: Planning October 1, 1984 Mr. John Livingood "Play It Again" Video 2091 S. Bascom Ave. Campbell, CA 95008 RE: Sign Application (SA 84-51) 2091 S. Bascom Ave. Dear Mr. Livingood: Please be advised that the Planning Director has conditionally approved your signing request to erect a wall sign on the refer- enced property. This approval is subject to the following changes in your proposal: 1. Relocation of the proposed sign so that it is parallel to the building and also ab shown on the attached ele- vation; and 2. Painting of the sign can and trim so that it matches the dark brown of the building. A cop, of the approved proposal is enclosed for your records. Prior to erection of this sign, please secure any necessary building permits from the Campbell Building Department. Your signing request has been conditionally approved pursuant to Sections 21.68.090(d)(2) and 21.68.090(d)(4) of the Campbell Muni- cipal Code. This decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission as prescribed in Section 21.68.130 of the Code. A copy of the sign ordinance is enclosed for your information. If you have any questions regarding this conditional approval, please do not hesitate to contact the Planning Office. Sincerely, ARTNM A. KEE PLANNING DIRECMR TIM J. PIN�R II T.BI:lj CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 N O R T H F I R S T STREET CAMPBELL. CALIFORNIA 95008 (408)866-2100 Department: Planning April 14. 1988 NOTICE TO APPEAR FILE 0 CE ADDRESS: 2091 S. Bascom Ave. IN THE MATTER OF: Owner/Manager Printing Tomorrow 2091A S. Bascom Ave. Campbell, CA 95008 TO: Owner/Manager YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that an informal hearing will be held in the Office of the City Attorney, Campbell City Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California, on Tuesday, April 19, 1988 at 3:30 p.m. to consider your alleged violation(s) of Section(s) 21.53.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code, to wit: Continued use of illegal a -frame sign. YOU ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that you should appear atthe above time and place to SHOW CAUSE why a court action should not be filed against you by reason of said alleged violation. You should bring with you any and all records, documents, or other evidence which may establish that said violation does not exist, or that court action should not be brought against you. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Marty Woodworth at 866-2140. MR. WILLIAM R. SELIGMANN ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF CAMPBE-.L 20370 TOWN CENTER LANE, #245 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 yJla�t� t-les�G.�. By Marty . Woodworth, Finnner II For W. R. Seligmann Non -Certified Copies: City Atty/CE/Chron CITY OF CAMPBELL /0 NORTH FIRST STREET CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 866-2100 Department: Planning December 29, 1987 NOTICE TO APPEAR FILE # CE ADDRESS: 2091A S. Bascom IN THE MATTER OF: Owner/Manager Printing Tomorrow 2091A S. Bascom Ave. Campbell, CA 95008 TO: Owner/Manager YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that an informal hearing will be held in the Office of the City Attorney, Campbell City Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California, on Tuesday, January 5, 1988 at 3:15 p.m. to consider your alleged violation(s) of Section(s) 21.53.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code, to wit: Failure to remove a -frame sign. YOU. ARE FURTHER NOTIFIED that you should appear at the above time and place to SHOW CAUSE why a court action should not be filed against you by reason of said alleged violation. You should bring with you any and all records, locuments, or other evidence which may establish that said violation does not exist, or that court action should not be brought against you. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Marty C. Woodworth at 866-2140. MR. WILLIAM R. SELIGMANN ATTORNEY FOR THE CITY OF CAMPBELL 2n370 TOWN CENTER LANE, l245 CUPERTINO, CA 95014 By Martr. Woodworth -.,GC_.. For W. I( Seligmann Non -Certified Copies: City Atty/CE/Chron CITY UE CA MPRELL 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAMP BELL. CALIFORNIA 95008 (408)866-2100 Department,: Planning December 15, 1987 Printing Tomorrow 2091A S.Bascom Ave. Campbell, CA 95008 RE. A-Prame/Movable sign - 2091A S. Bascom Ave. It has been brought to the attention of the Planning Department that you have placed an A-frame/Movable sign in front of your business. This is in violation of Section 21.53.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code. Please be advised that within three working days, (on or before December 21, 1987) the sign(s) must be removed. Fai.ure to comply will result in this matter being referred to the City Attorney for further action. If you have questions re, ',ng this matter, please contact the Planning Department at 866-2140 Sincerely, ARTHUR A. KEE P,hhMNING DIRECTO MARTY C. N()ODNORTFi PLANNER II ld n CITY OF CAM1PBELL 70 N O R T H F I R S T STREET CA'APBEL L. CALIFORNIA 95008 (408)866-2100 Department Planning December 15, 1967 Bascom Florist 2091 S. Bascom Ave. Campbell, CA 95008 RE: Sign on Flower Cart 2091 S. Bascom Ave. It has been brought to the attention of the Planning Department that you have placed a sign on a flower cart in front of your business. This is in violation of Section 21.53.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code. Please be advised that within three working days, (on or before December 21, 1987) the sign(s) must be removed. Failure to comply will result in this matter being referred to the City Attorney for further action. If you have questions regarding this matter, please contact the Planning Department at 866-2140. Sincerely, ART80R A. KEE P{„ANNING DI C_TORC;�� MARTY C. WOODWORTH PLANNER. II Id ('ITV (IF (11AN1I'll 1II. 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAMP BELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408)866-2100 Department. PIann lnr Mx. Jack Livingood A(7If:C, Inc. 6044 Indian Ave. San Jose, CA 95123 RF.: SA 86-02 - 2091 S.Ba_scom Ave. Sign application appeal Dear Mr. Livingood: Please he advised that the Planning; Commission, at its meeting of April 3, 1986, removed your item from the agenda in that you indicated that you would be submitting a revised signing proposal. The Planning Director has indicated that a revised proposal should he submitted .J thin two weeks, on or before A rig 24, 1996. Failure to submit a revised plan within this time frame will result in this matter being referred to the City Attorney for abatement action. If you should have questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact the Planning I1etlartment at R66-_14n, Sincerely, ARTHIR A. KME PLAMINC DIPTCr(1R 1'J. li\1:)' ' PI.A\NIiR T I a :P �I ■ CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 N O R T H F I R S T STREET CAMpBEL L, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 866-2100 D-artment: Planning April 1, 1986 TO: Mr. Jack Livingood AGMEC, Inc. 6044 Indian Ave. San Jose, CA 95123 FILE NO: SA 86-02 ADDRESS: 2091 S. Bascom Ave. - PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Continued sign application SITE 6 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW APPOINTMENT: Date: Tuesday, April 8, 1986 Time: 9:00 a.m. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: 7:30 p.m., Tuesday, April 8, 1986 Please be advised that the Site and Architectural Review Committee of the Campbell Planning Commission will review your plans for approval of the above -refercnced project at the apointment time noted above, in the Planning Conference Room, North Wing, City Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. The Committee Chairman will then make a recommendation at the regular meeting of .the Planning Commission which is held at 7:30 p.m. on the above -referenced date, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. A copy of the Staff Report and recommendation, as well as the a enda for the E lAnning Commission meeting,will be mailed to you on Friday, April 9 6. It is necessary that you, or an authorized representative, be present at the Architectural Review Committee meeting and the Planning Commission meeting. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact the Planning Department at 866-2140. Sincerely, ARTHUR A. REE PLANNING DIRECTOR ld/lj CASTELLO. DAILY & GERAINO ATTORNEY$ AT LAW RAYMOND V CASTELLO 'AO BI BaE�D16 A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION TERRENCE J. DAILY FRED - JR. IJaO WINCHESTER BLVD. JI RONALD M—EAMAN CAMPISELL,CA GSOOa 119a March 26, 1986 Planning Department City of Campbell 70 North First Street Campbell, CA 95008 Attn: Linda RE: File No: SA 86-02 Location: 2091 S. Bascom Ave. Our Client: Jack Livingood Dear Linda: This i3 to confirm in writing our telephone conversation of March 25, 1986 in which I informed you that Mr. Jack Livingood has decided to handle this matter on his own from now on. Based on Mr. Livingood's request, please withdraw me as attorney of record in this matter and I would further appreciate your taking my name otf the particular application involved. If there is any change in my statr, in the future, I shall let you know. Thank you very much. Very truly yours, TERRENCE J. DAILY TJD:lh RECEmp MAR " .' 1986 CITY OF CAMPBELL PL.ANNINO DEPANTMENT 0 CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAM PBEL L. CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 866-2100 Department: P lanninq March 21, 1986 TO: Mr. Jack Livingood Mr. Terrence J. Dailey AG1II:C, Inc. Castello, Daily 6 Gerbino 6044 Indian Ace. 1790 S. Winchester Blvd. San Jose, CA 95123 Campbell, CA 95008 RE: PILE NO: SA 86-02 LOCATION: 2091 S. Bascom Ave. Please be advised that the Planning Commission of the City of Campbell has set the time of 7:30 p.m., or shortly thereafter, on Tuesday, Mareh 25, 1986 for consideration of the above -referenced application. A copy of the agenda and t , Staff Comment Sheet for this item is enclosed for your information. t is advisable that you, or an authorized representative, be present for said hearing. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the Planning, Department at 866-2143. Sincerely, C�LLIL- s ARTHUR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR ld/lj Enclosures CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAM PBELL. CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 866-2100 Department: Planning February 7, 1986 TO: Mr. Jack Livingood Mr. Terrence J. Dailey AGMEC, Inc. Castello, Gaily 6 Gerbino 6044 Indian Ace. 1790 S. Winchester Blvd. San Jose, CA 95123 Campbell, CA 95008 FILE NO: SA 86-02 ADDRESS: M91 S. Bascom Ave. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Signing appeal - Play It Again Video SITE 6 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW APPOINTMENT: Date: Tuesday, February 11, 1986 Time: 8:00 a.n. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: 7:30 pm, Tuesday, February 11, 1986 Please be advised that the Architectural Review Committee of the Campbell Planning Commission will review your plans for approval of the above -referenced project at the appointment time noted above, in the North Wing Conference Room, City Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. The Committee Chairman will then make a recommendation a'_ the regular meeting of the Planning Commission which is held at 7:30 p.m. on the above -referenced date, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. A copy of the Staff Comment Sheet and recommendation, as well as the agenda for the Planning Commission meeting, is enclosed for your information. It is necessary that you, or an authorized representative, be present at said Architectural Review Committee meeting and the Planning Commission meeting. if you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact ' the Planning Department at 866-2140. Sincerely, ARTHJR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECi^R ld/lj Enclosures F CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAM PBEL L. CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 866-2100 Department. Planning February 3, 1986 Owner/Manager "Play It Again" Video 2091 S. Bascom Ave. Campbell, CA 95008 RE: Canopy sign 2091 S. Bascom Ave. Dear Sir: It has come to the attention of the Planning Department that the approved canopy reading "Video Rental s Sales" has been removed from your business and that an unapproved canopy sign reading "Video" has been retained. The Planning Department does not have difficulty supporting this new sign in lieu of the approved canopy sign, however, 1t is necessary that the file reflect this change in signing. Please submit a drawing which depicts this new canopy sign. Additionally, please paint the cabinet cf this sign dark brown so that it is consistent with the other approved canopy signs in the center. Additionally, please secure any necessary building permits which would be required in conjunction with the erection of new signing. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact the Planning Office. Sincerely, ARTHUR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR TI��O PLAINER II TJH:lj r If I �71 Q �I 416� i [jDJ ---- i LEF SIDE ELEVAT E�P ELEyArl0 Iv ADDI A PLAY GAI VIP 2di i •,. 0 Av . t e `� CITY OF CAMPBELL I APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT BUS:YESS NAME: "Play It Again" video Date: Sept. 28 ADDRESS OF BUSINESS: 2091 south Bascan Telephone No.: 371-5300 OWNER/APPLICANT AG4E'C Inc. s John Livingocd (par*hers) Telephone No. :629-7615 ,Jad1 C. Livingood F-res. od core. Zip Code SIGN COMPANY /V /, �_ Telephone No.: Zip Code ------------------------------------------ - In accordance with Sections 21.68.030 and 21.68.110 of the Municipal Code of the City of Campbell, the undersigned hereby makes application for approval of the attached sign plan and agrees to abide by the Sign Reguiacions of the City and the conditions o approval for this application. Signature Appliq0t Signature of Property Owner ------------------------------------------ ` I - 09-sI SA Approved as presented Conditionally approved�— Denied ARTHUR A. KEE, PLANNING DIRECTOR jJu �' ?' �• '�' SEP j a IW4 �J by — I_ CiT GF c.,�....a�L PLd.NNNG 4CAM /Y(«T .lid_ _J ni �unaaiu r* p 3-90 I 4 PRUNEYARP SHOPPING CENTER 1 1-story office building A 9 f —IA ft. -6X CITY OF CAMPBELL 2091 S. BASCOM AVE. SA 84-51/86-02