Loading...
SA 86-17CITY OF CAMPBELL 2230 S. BASCOM AVENUE SA 86-1 CITY COUNCIL JULY 15, 1986 APPEALS Appeal of Planning This is an appeal of Frank Clarizio, Sunflower Nutrition Commission decision !',enter, 2230 S. Bascom Avenue, Campbell, of the Planning .ienying free-standing Commission decision denying his applicatiop for a free - sign at 2230 S. Basoan standing sign on the subject property. avenue - Sunflower Nutrition Center - Plain 'ng Director Kee - Report dated July 15, 1986. SA 86-17 - (Cont'd. 6/3/86) Steven Bowman, Attorney repr-senting Fra-1, Clarizio, appeared before the Council on behalf of his client, to request that the sign be allowed to remain for two years at which Lime it will be brought into coi,fommnce. In addition, Mr. Bownan stated that Mr. Clarizio is willing to remove a non-confoxming sign located -4 2250 S. Mascan Avenue (APN #289-06-04). Following discussion, h/S: Doetsch, Ashworth - to overrule the Planning Commission decision and allow the free-standing sign at 2230 S. Bascom Avenue to remain for one year and nine months, at which time the applicant will bring the sign into conform umce, and that the applicant agrees to remove the non- conforming sign located — 2250 S. Bascom Avenue (APN N288-W-04) at this time. Ihtion adopted by a 4-1-0 vote, Council.mmber Podgorsek voting '74o". CITY COUNCIL June 3, 1986 Appeal of Funk This is an appeal of frank Clarizio of the Planning Clarizio of Commission decision denying his request for a free - Planning Commission standing sign, 2230 S. Bascom Avenue, SA 86-17. decision - 2230 S. Bascom Avenue - Planning Director Kee - Report dated June 6, 1986. SA 86-17 M/S: Podgorsek, Doetsch - that the appeal of Frank Clr-izio of the Planning Commission decision denying his request for a free standing sign, 2230 S. Bascom Avenue, be continued to the July 15, 1986 City Council Meeting, at the applicant's request. Motion adoptod by a 4-0-1 vote, Ouuncilmsmber Ashworth absent. Appeal of Planning Commission decision denying a free-stanCing sign at 2230 S. Bascom Ave. - Sunflower Nutrition Center - SA 86-17. RECONNENDATION That the City Council adopt the attached findings and uphold the decision of the Planning Ccmmission denying the freestanding sign. DISCUSSION At its previous meeting of June 13, 1986, the City Council continued the consideration of this appeal, at the applicant's request. A copy of the previous Planning Commission report is attached for the Counril's review. COST Not applicable. I tMP-AMn & Planning Staff AWMIpA July 15, 1986 .�F Appeal of Planning Commission decision denying a free-standing sign at 2230 S. Bascom Ave. - Sunflower Nutrition Center - SA 86-17. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council aonot the attached findings and uphold the decision of the Planning Commission denying the freestanding sign. DISCUSSION The applicant refaced an existing freestanding sign and constructed a new wall sign without obtaining a permit. Staff notified him of the violation and he submitted an application. The signs required Planning Commission approval because they exceeded the size and height requirements of the Signing ordinance. The signs are described as follows: Description Re_9,iested Permitted 1. Nall sign reading "Sunflower Natural Foods" 98 sq.ft. 50 sq.ft. 2. Freestanding sign 60 sq.ft. 50 sq.ft. "Sunflower Natural Foods" "Vita..itns Cosmetics" ''Bulk Food" 23 ft. height 14 ft. height The Planning Commission may authorize larger and/or higher signs when it determines that the use for which the signs erected could not be adequately identified or are unusually difficult to locate in comparison to similar uses without exceeding the standards provided in the Sign Ordinance (21.68.140 Campbell Municipal Code). At its meeting of May 13, 1986 the Planning Commission approved the wall sign, but denied the freestanding sign based on the attached findings. Attached are the minutes from that meeting. At this time, the applicant is appealing the Planning Commission's decision denying the freestanding sign. Attached is his letter of appeal explaining his reasons. COST Not applicable. PMP-J cD a i AGOIDA Planning Department SUNFLOWER NATURAL GODS 2230 S. Bascom Ave. Campbell. CA 95008 May 2 1986 City Council City of Campbell 70 North First Street Campbell, CA 95008 Re: APPEAL FROM DECISION OP PLANNING COMMISSION - SA 86-17 - 2230 S. Basi4p Ave. Gentlemen: I wish to appeal the decision of the Planning Commission as to their denial of the free-standing sign at Sunflower Natural Foods at 2230 S. Bascom Ave., Campbell on the following grounds: 1. When our property was annexed into the City of Campbell, we were told we could keep the free-standing signs. 2. Although the pole itself may be 30 feet high, the sign in actuality is only 23 feet high. 1 look forward to being heard on this matter in the near'futurel i Sincerely. - FRANK �LARIZIO President SUNFLOWER NATLRAL FOODS FC:pw cc MAY 2 9 1996 CITY CF ot.ANNING DEi°4RTMEj4T 9 e RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FILE NO: SA - SITE ADDRESS: 2230 S. BASCOM AVE. APPLICANT: SUNFLOWER NUTRITION CENTER 1. The proposed freestanding sign height of 23 feet exceeds the 14 foot height specifi...t in the sign regulations. 2. The proposed combined square footage of the three panels on the freestanding sign measures 60 sq.ft. which exceeds the maximum sign area of 50 sq.ft. indicated in the Sign Ordinance. 3. There is little architectural compatibility between the freestanding sign design and the building design. 4. There is little architectural compatibility between the freestanding sign design and the building design. 5. The applicant has not demonstrated facts to support the findings necessary to warrant a larger or higher sign. The location of the buildinb in relationship to the street frontage and the location of the freestanding sign along the street frontage (5 ft. from sidewalk) doe not support an exception to the sign regulations. PLANNING 01VISSIGN F.rM. MY 13, 1986 MISCELLANEOUS SA 86-17 Continued sign application of Sunflower Sunflower Nutrition Nutrition Center for property known as 2230 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Perrine reported that this application was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The applicant would like an opportunity to address the Commission. No recommendation is being made by the Site Committee. Mr. Kee reported that the applicant has subsequently met with Staff and has indicated that he would agree to bring the signing into conformance with the sign regulations, if the Planning Commission would approve the existing signing for a period of two years. If the Planning Commission chooses to approve the an! feant's request for a two year period, Staff is recommending that th% :pn.'icant . bmit ar, agreement satisfactory to the City Attorney which woui, p_ovidt for the removal of these signs within two years. Staff is of the of u.t.ou that the applicant's signing request Is not Justified as discussed in the previous Staff Comment Sheet. Chairman Kvsolas noted tha, the Commission must me'.e findings in accordance with Section 21.68.140 of the Municipal Code. He asked if this sign fits into this elct; is it difficult to locate this business; how are we handling everyone else on the street? rir. Kee responded that the City is requiring conformance when signing is changed. Mr. Frank Clarizio, applicant, noted that See's Candy store blocks his busiress coming south. He would like to replace the sign at the television store; and, he would replace the subject sign in two years. M./S: Christ, Perrin - That the Planning Commission ■pprovt the requested wall sign; and that the Plan. ing Commission deny the free-standing sign as presented. Discussion of Motion Commissioner Olszewski felt that there was a hardship on this business because of the setbacks on the See's building; and, he was in agreement that the free-standing sign should not be approved as presented, and that the wrll sign be approved. Chairman Kasolae asked what changes had been made on the sign; and, if a change in the lettering makes a difference. obo wr-{ ® 0 Mr. Kee responded that the lettering and text of the sign had been changed; and, the change of lettering requires compliance under the signing ordinance. Vote on Motion Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). Mr. Kee explained the appeal procedure to Mr. Clarizfo. Commissioner Christ noted that he was not against the free-standing sign, but rather against the sign ar presented. R ! R RECOMMENDED FINDI FILE NO. SA SITE ADDRESS: 2230 S. DASCOM AVE. APPLICANT: SWFLONER NOTRITION CENTER I. The proposed wall sign of approximately 98 sq.ft. significantly exceeds the maximum sign area of 50 sq.ft. provided in the Sign Ordinance. 2. The proposed freestanding sign height of 23 feet exceeds the 14 foot height specified in the sign regulations. 3. The proposed combined square footage of the three panels on •.he freestanding sign measures 60 sq.ft. which exceeds the maximum sign area of 50 sq.ft. indicated in the Sign Ordinance. 4. There is little architectural compatibility between the freestanding sign design and the building design. �ONDiT10NS OF APPROVAL 1. Applicant to provide an agreement within 30 days of Planning Commission approval, g.tisfactory to the City Attorney, to bring the signing at this location into conformance with the standards set forth in Section 21.68.090(4) within 2 years of 21anning C-smission approval. 2. Applicant to obtain any necessary building permits. R f f It— � '—SHADY DALE TRiVi l64 gr T Moir" I 'Pj 7-r4 1 to: ap if 5 13 11 10 9 4 �711n� L TRACT J2 14 ¢ 1a!'56 Lot it I is to i so t4A 7 ,It dr SA 36-17• 2230 S. Bascom Ave.—��- '4 l -7 1111 :jJ2 rox., 9P �411 41 46 10 It ARNDT* PCIL VIM tr10!9 4.1 7 7 eiv 1.175 AC o; Apr PC 0 -%" .4 to p C?ol a PIANNING CMMSSICN MTG: 4122/86 SA 86-17 Sign application of Sunflower Nutrition Sunflower Nutrition Center for property known as 2230 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Commissioner Olssewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. '"he Committee is in agreement with Staff's recommendation for denial. A continuance was discussed with the applicant, however, it was the aepllcant's wish that the issue be brought before the Commission. Additionally, the Committee is of the upinion that landscaping on this site should be discussed. Mr. Kee indicated that there were existing signs when this property was annexed into the City, and the lettering of those existing signs has been changed which, under the ordinance, constitutes a new sign. Commissioner Fairbanks asked if it was clear to the Site Committee if the applicant understood the signing ordinance. Commissioner Olazewski noted that the sign ordinance was explained a number of times during the meeting. Mr. Prank Clarizio, applicant, stated that he was told he could keep his sign when the site was annexed intc the City ten years ago. He continued that a sign company indicated to him that the plastic part of the sign which contains the lettering is not the "sign", but rather the "facing". He changed the "facing" -- not the "sign. Mr. Kee noted that the sign could be kept as it was; however, it has beer changed - the lettering is different. According to our ordinance, the sign has been changed. Unfortunately, it is not the sign company who defines a sign, but rather the City's ordinance. Commissioner Olszewskl asked the record to show that the applicant was Informed of the City's signing policy, as just stated by Mr. Kee, at the Site and Architectural Review Committee meeting. If the applicant so desires, an opinion from the City Attorney may be obtained. Mr. Clarizio stated that he had asked the City Attorney. The City Attorney told him that it became a new sign when it was changed. Mr. Clarizio noted that he did not take anything down, he just changed the letters. Commission Fairbanks asked if the Planning Commission chooses to deny this request, and the applicant chooses to return the sign to the way it was when 1t was grandfathered in, would he be able to do that. 0 Mr. Seligman stated that if the sign were returned to it's original state at this point, it would now have to be approved in wnatever form it has been changed. Mr. Kee indicated that the Planning Commission would have the authority to approve the sign going back to it's original state. Commissioner Dickson noted that the Commission would be approving a non -conforming sign if this was done. There was additional ulscu>sion regarding the possibility of returning the sign to its original state; the relocating of the subject business; and the possibility of a continuance. Mr. Clarizio stated that he would like a continuance in order to work with Staff on a revised signing proposal. Commissioner Olszewski suggested that the applicant incorporate the concerns from the Site Committee, as well as those stated this evening, in the re -design of his signing. M/S: Fairbanks, Christ - That SA 86-17 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of May 13, 1986 in order that revised plans may be submitted. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). f a f .fie". v..9 ,- ... ,era• ITEM NO. 9 STAFF COMMENT SHEET - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 13, 1986 SA 86-17 Continued sign application of Sunflower Nutrition Sunflower Center for property known as 2230 S. Bascom Ave. Nutrition in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Center STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. That the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and deny the applicant's signing request; or 2. If approved, subject to the attached conditions. STAFF DISCUSSION The Planning Commission, a. its previous meeting of April 22, 1986, continued the consideration of this signing request so that the applicant could meet with Staff to discuss possible signing alternatives. The applicant has subsequently met with S.aff and has indicated that he would agree to bring the signing into conformance with the sign regulations, if the Planning Commission would approve the existing signing for a period of two years. If the Planning Commission chooses to approve the applicant's request for a two year period, Staff is recommending that the applicant submit an agreement satisfactory to the City Attorney which would provide for the removal of these signs within two years. Staff is of the opinion that the applicant's signing request is not justified as discussed in the previous Staff Comment Sheet. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Applicant to provide an agreement within 30 days of Planning Commission approval, satisfactory to the City Attorney, to bring t'ie signing at this location into conformance with the standards set forth in Section 21.68.090(4) within 2 years of Planning Commission approval. 2. Applicant to obtain any necessary building permits. STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 22, 1986 SA 86-17 Sign application of Sunflower Nutrition Sunflower Nutrition Center for property known as 2230 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. 1. That the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and deny the applicant's signing request; or 2. That the Planning Commission continue the consideration of this request to its meeting of May 27, 1986 so that revised plans may be submitted. STAFF DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting approval of a permit to allow the placement of a new wall sign on the building facade and the refacing of an existing freestanding sign. The applicant's signing proposal is as follows: Description 1. Wall sign reading "Sunflower Natural Foods" 2. Freestanding sign 60 sq.ft. 50 sq.ft. "Sunflower Natural Foods" "Vitamins Cosmetics" "Bulk Food" 23 ft. height 14 ft. height As reviewed above, the applicant is requesting approval of signing which exceeds the height limit and square footage limits as specified in the Sign Ordinance. The Planning Commission may authorize larger and/or higher signs when it determines that the use for which the signs erected would not be adequately identified or are unusually difficult to locate In comparison to similar uses without exceeding the standards provided in the Sign Ordinance (21.68.140 Campbell Municipal Code). 'staff is of the opinion that the applicant has not demonstrated facts to support the findings neccessary to warrant a larger or higher sign. The location of the building in relationship to the street frontage and the location of the freestanding sign along the street frontage (5 ft. from sidewalk) do not support an exception to the sign regulations. The requested signs have been erected at this time. RECOMMENDED FINDI1R.f go FILE K- SA $riT SITE ADDRESS: 2230 S. BASCON AVE. APPLICANT: SUNFLOWER NUTRITION CENTER 1. The proposed wall sign of approximately 98 sq.ft. significantly exceeds the maximum sign area of 50 sq.ft. provided in the Sign Ordinance. 2. The proposed freestanding sign height of 23 feet exceeds the 14 foot height specified in the sign regulations. 3. The proposed combined square footage of the three panels on the freestanding sign measures 60 sq.ft. which exceeds the maximum sign area of 50 sq.ft. indicated in the Sign Ordinance. i. There is little architectural compatibility between the freestanding sign design and the building design. ITEM NO. 9 STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 22, 1986 SA 86-17 Sign application of Sunflower Nutrition Sunflower Nutrition Center for property known as 2230 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. That the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and deny the applicant's signing request; or 2. That the Planning Commission continue the consideration of this request to its meeting of May 27, 1986 no that revised plans may be submitted. STAFF DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting approval of a permit to allow the placement of a new wall sign on the building facade and the refacing of an existing freestanding sign. The applicant's signing proposal is as follows: Description Requested Permitted 1. Mall sign reading "Sunflower Natural Foods" 98 aq.ft. 50 sq.ft. 2. Freestanding sign 60 sq.ft. 50 sq.ft. "Sunflower Natural Foods" 'Vitamins Cosmetics" "Bulk Food" 23 ft. height 14 ft. height As reviewed above, the applicant is requesting approval of signing which exceeds the height limit and square footage limits as specified in the Sign Ordinance. The Planning Commission may authorize larger and/or higher signs when it determines that the use for which the signs erected would not be adequately identified or are unusually difficult to locate in comparison to similar uses without exceeding the standards provided in the Sign Ordinance (21.68.140 Campbell Municipal Code). Staff is of the opinion that the applicant has not demonstrated facts to support the findings neccessary to warrant a larger or higher sign. The location of the building in relationship to the street frontage and the location of the freestanding sign along the street frontage (5 ft. from sidewalk) do not support an exception to the sign regulations. The requested signs have been erected at this time. f f R RECOMMENDED FINDIGS lei �A�i-ice SITE ADDRESS: 2230 S. BASCOM AVE. APPLICANT: SUNFLOWER NUTRITION CENTER 1. The proposed wall sign of approximately 98 sq.ft. significantly exceeds the maximum sign area of SO sq.ft. provided in the Sign Ordinance. 2. The proposed freestanding sign height of 23 feet exceeds the 14 foot height specified In the sign regulations. 3. The proposed combined square footage of the three panels on the freestanding sign measures 60 sq.ft. which exceeds the maximum sign area of SO sq.ft. indicated in the Sign Ordinance. 4. There is little architectural compatibility between the freestanding sign design and the building design. 1+ �•. SHADY DALE rluitr rz'!ss .�..-;.,.�.e':.. .� -_ vl toN=•I /oSCI 1o70si/Ota{; IIL'o 1 _llk4.�11- 1• ' J6•B roa. ty AIL � N 1 n• `�a ,v LI Ir 6 If 1 a i t eG7 x I 1•! �131 1-17 t on 1 12: •_ `r7" In/.7 m« •s - a LON BENT r TRACT, if 8 i 1! i IF •N � - SA 36-17 n r Qh � L , g � � ' ET l0`L7 i 111, i ill 2230 i � ' i y �.1r S. Bascom Ave. V __3 a 7 ti1 'L• s:t 1 Io Y3 i 1V17T! ILL N _) ARNOTT . �, � � .'I •� 1 O IrL ' 1 I 1: 10 �rol.. •,,:. _,y • .',;;. ' „ '� a lJlr( G.&H )r m.. ;.IFr AC N[T A ..•i �. �� f!. itI • �•. _ �_ rer >ti - ■ ij LITi ITC. "T ><; , AF as st _.Iou bto^ ro" +„E- CODE 8967837 AT TEE REQUEST OF'Uy OF CAMPIIEU SEP 2 3 M6 CITY OF CAMPGZLL CITY Of CAMPBELL PLAN N�NG DCPth T.f�ryT 70 North First Street C,mbbell. California 95008 AGREEMENT FOR REMOVAL OF SIGNS J &' b 8 PAGE 1434 This agreement is between the City of Campbell, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and FRANK and LILY CLARIZIO, hereinafter referred to as "CLARIZIO", and is effective July 15, 198b. WHEREAS, CLARIZIO is the owner of two parcels of commericial real property located at 2230 & 2250 Bascom Avenue, Parcel Vs 288-06-004 and 288-06-005, Campbell, California; and on the effective date of this agreement there stood on those two parcels of real property owned by CLARIZIO, two free standing signs which are not in compliance with the signing ordinances of the City of Campbell; and WHEREAS, the City of Campbell Planning Commission has heretofore ordered that the sign on Parcel 288-06-004 located at 2250 Bascom Avenue be removed and brought into compliance with the signing ordinances of the City of Campbell; and WHEREAS, CLARIZIO had appealed said order and decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council by majority vote on July 15, 1986, has granted CLARIZIO the privilege of using the existing sign on Parcel 288-06-004 located at 2230 Bascom Avenue, in its present state of condition for the term of one (1) year and nine (9) months from July 15, 1986; IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS; 1. CLARIZIO shall remove forthwith, and in no event later than ten (10) days from execution of this agreement, that free standing sign on Parcel 288-06-005 at 2250 Bascom Avenue, Campbell, California. Anv new sign to be erected upon said premises shall be in full compliance with the signing of the City of Campbell. 2. CLARIZIO shall remove the existing free standing sign located on Parcel 288-06-004 at 2230 Bascom Avenue, Campbell, California no later than April 15, 1988. Any new sign to be erected on the premises theresf}er$;hall be in full wpliance with the City of Campbell signing ordinances. '8FAE1435 3. During said period from July 15, l9br through April 15, 1988, CLARIZIO may not change or alter the existing sign on Parcel 288-06-004 without bringinq said sign into full compliance with the City of Campbell signing ordinances. CLARIZIO may make any needed repairs in compliance with Section 21.68.040(l) of the City of Campbell signir, ordinances. DATED: DATED: V/`/ f4 DATED: 9/2/86 %t FB&NK CLARIZIO LILY aARIZIO CITY OBE ICiAEL F. K(IIOM31U, MAYOR In,E y -% r r#' w p J80PAA1433 CITY OF CAMPBELL TO NORTH FIRST STREET CAMpg ELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 888-2100 Depxonent: Planning September 23. 1986 Mr. Frank Clarizio 2025 Willester San Jose, CA 95124 RE: Executed agreement - "Removal of sign" Dear Mr. Clarizio: Please find enclosed a copy of the signed agreement regarding the freestanding signs on your properties located on Bascom Ave. In light of this agreement, it is the Planning Department's understanding that the freestanding sign located at 2250 S. Bascom Ave. should have been removed as of this date, and that the freestanding sign located at 2230 S. Bascom will be brought into conformance by April 15, 1988. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact the Planning Office. Sincerely, ARTHUR A. EEE PLANNING DIR%REEECTT'OORR' TIHALEEY Q PLANNER II TJH:lj Enc. SEP 2 3 M6 CITY OF CAMP©ELL PLANNING DEPARTMCNT AGREEMENT FOR REMOVAL OF SIGNS This agreement is between the City of Campbell, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and FRANK and LILY CLARIZIO, hereinafter referred to as "CLARIZIO", and is effective July 15, 1986. WHEREAS, CLARIZIO is the owner of two parcels of commericial real property located at 2230 s 2250 Bascom Avenue, Parcel #'s 288-06-004 and 288-06-005, Campbell, California; and on the effective date of this agreement there stood on those two parcels of real property owned by CLARIZIO, two free standing signs which are not in compliance with the signing ordinances of the City of Campbell; and WHEREAS, the City of Campbell Planning Commission has heretofore ordered that the sign on Parcel 288-06-004 located at 2250 Bascom Avenue be removed and brought into compliance with the signing ordinances of the City of Campbell; and WHEREAS, CLARIZIO had appealed said order and decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council by majority vote on July 15, 1986, has granted CLARIZIO the privilege of using the existing sign on Parcel 288-06-004 located at 2230 Bascom Avenue, in its present state of condition for the term of one (1) year and nine (9) months from July 15, 1986; IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. CLARIZIO shall remove forthwith, and in no event later than ten (10) days from execution of this agreement, that free standing sign on Parcel 288-06-005 at 2250 Bascom Avenue, Campbell, California. Any new sign to be erected Ui,Or: said premises shall be in full compliance with the signing of the City of Campbell. 2. CLARIZIO shall remove the existing free standing sign located on Parce: 288-06-304 at 2230 Bascom Avenue, Campbell, California no l..er than April 15, 1988. Any new Sian to be erected on the premises thereafter shall be in lull compliance with the City of Campbell signing ordinances. • 3. During said period from July 15, 1986 through April 15, 1988, CLARIZIO may not chanqe or alter the existinq sign on Parcel 288-06-004 without bringinq said sign into full compliance with the City of Campbell signing ordinances. CLARIZIO may make any needed repairs in compliance with Section 21.68.040(1) of the City of Campbell signing ordinances. DATED:— f/A/86 DATED: V/ F/ f4 DATED: 9/2/86 FWKNK CLARIZIO LILY C ARIZIO CITY O�J ICHAEL F. KC1TOWW, MAYOR SHIMY DALIE ii -i 0 CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAMP ELL. CALIFORNIA 95008 (408)888.2100 0ep&rtmw+1: Planning September 8, 1986 Mr. Frank Clarizi3 2025 Willester Ave. San Jose, CA 95124 RE: 2230 6 2250 S. 8ascom Ave. Signing Agreement Dear Mr. Clarizio: Enclosed is an "Agreement for Removal of Signs", as adoptrd by the Campbell City Council at its meeting of July 15, 198f. Please sign and date the enclosed agreement, and return it to the Planning Department in the enclosed envelope. A copy of the signed document will be forwarded to you in the return mail. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the City Attorney, Mr. William R. Seligmann, at 252-1111; or, the Planning Department at 866-2140. Sincerely, ARTHUR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR LINDA A. DENNIS SECRETARY, PLANNING DEPARTMENT ld r.nclosure: Agreement 0 r` AGREEMENT FOR REMOVAL OF SIGNS This agreement is between the City of Campbell, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and FRANK and LILY CLARIZIO, hereinafter referred to as "CLARIZIO", and is effective July 15, 1986. WHEREAS, CLARIZIO is the owner of two parcels of commericial real property located at 2230 & 2250 Bascom Avenue, Parcel is 288-06-004 and 288-06-005, Campbell, California; and on the effective date of this agreement there stood on those two parcels of real property owned by CLARIZIO, two free standing signs which are not in compliance with the signing ordinances of the City of Campbell; and WHEREAS, the City of Campbell Planning Commission has heretofore ordered that the sign on Parcel 288-06-004 located at 2250 Bascom Avenue be removed and brought into compliance with the signing ordinances of the City of Campbell; and WHEREAS, CLARIZIO uad appealed said order and decision of the Planning Commission to the City Counc_1; and WHEREAS, the City Council by majority vote on July 15, 1986, has granted CLARIZIO the privilege of usinq the existing sign on Parcel 288-06-004 located at 2230 Bascom Avenue, in its present state of condition for the term of one (1) year and nine (9) months from July 15, 1986; IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. CLARIZIO shall remove Forthwith, and in no event later than ten (10) days from execr' >n of this agreement, that free standing sign on Parcel 28b-06-005 at 2250 Bascom Avenue, Campbell, California. Any new sign to be erected upon said premises shall be in full compliance with the signing of the City of Campbell. 2. CLARIZIO shall remove the existing free standing siqn located on Parcel 288-06-004 at 2230 Bascom Avenue, Campbell, California no later than April 15, 1988. Any new siqn to be erected on the premises thereafter shall be in full compliance with the City of Campbell signing ordinances. 0 0 3. During said period from July 15, 1986 through April 15, 1988, CLARIZIO may not chanqe or alter the existing sign on Parcel 288-06-004 without bringinq said sign into full compliance with the City of Campbell signing ordinances4 CLARIZIO may make any needed repairs in compliance with Section 21.68.040(1) of the City of Campbell signing ordinances. DATED: DATED: DATED: 9/2/86 FRANK CLARIZIO LILY CLARIZIO CITY OzP=Z ICHAEL F. K01VA Ct, MAYOR DD B� N E _I DD I^ RWAI H I 3 tu A IN li CITY OF CAM?BELL 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAMP ELL, CALIFORNIA 96008 (408):86-2100 Department: Planning May 14, 1986 Mr. Frank Clarizio 2025 Willester Ave. San Jose, CA 95124 RE: SA 86-17 2230 S. Bascom Ave. Dear Mr. Clarizio: At its meeting of May 13, 1986 the Planning Commission took the following action regarding your sign application: 1. Approved the wall sign on the building. 2. Denied the free-standing sign, as presented. If you should like to appeal this decision, please follow the procedure as indicated on the enclosed page. Please note that an appeal must be filed by 5:00 p.m. on May 27, 1986, or the decision of the Planning Commission will be final. If the decision is not appealed, it is required that the entire free-standing sign be removed from the property by July 1, 1986. If you have questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact the Planning Department at 866-2140. Sincerely, ARMW A. I0 E PIAtN9ING DIRECTOR MM. 't. A0013110f II PLANNER II ld Enclosure: Appeal Procedure Plans CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAMP BELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 Is 08)866-2100 ----------------- i Department: Planning April 15, 1986 TO: Mr. Frank Clarizio 2025 Willester San Jose, CA 95124 FILE NO: SA 86-17 ADDRESS: 2230 S. Bascom Ave. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Signing request - Sunflower Nut Center SITE 6 ARCIIITECTU^.AL REVIEW APPOINTMENT: Date: Tuesday, April 22, 1986 iime: 9:00 a.m. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: 7:30 p.m., Tuesday, April 22, 1986 Please be advised that the Site and Architectural Review Committee of the Campbell Planning Commission will review your plans for approval of the above -referenced project at the apointment time noted above, in the Planning Conference Room, North Wing, City Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. The Committee Chairman will then make a recommendation at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission which is held at 7:30 p.m. on the above -referenced date, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 70 N. First St., Campbel'_, California. A co of the Staff Report and recommendation, se well es the a ends for the Planning Commission meeting, wil be mai a to you on Fri ay, April 15, 1906. It is necessary that you, or an authorized representative, be present at the Architectural Review Committee meeting and the Planning Commission meeting. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact the Planning Department at 866-2140. Sincerelly,��/ . a41'7�e(r ARTMIR A. KEN PLANNING I)XUC M .. `'' c T I�,.r�.-.e+y.+�MYr+n«.-�wwM.'71;Y�Y.A�}�rM'/ra•1Gy, ��� v 1 . ►M..r..w- m ❑0 CITY OF CAMPBELL 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAM PBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 866.2100 Department: Planning May 7, 1986 TO: Mr. Frank Clarizfo 2025 Willester San Jose, CA 95124 FILE NO: SA 86-17 ADDRESS: 2230 S. Bascom Ave. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Signing request - Sunflower Nut Center SITE 6 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW APPOINTMENT: Date: Tuesday, Nay 13, 1986 Time: 9.30 a.m. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: 7:30 p.m., Tuesday, May 13, 1986 Please be advised that the Site and Architectural Review Committee of the Campbell Planning Commission will review your plans for approval of the above -referenced project at the apointment time noted above, in the Planning Conference Room, Norrh Wing, City Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. The Committee Chairman will then make a recommendation at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission which is held at 7:30 p.m. on the above -referenced date, in the City Nall Council Chambers, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. A co of the S[aff Re ort and recommendation as well as the a ends for the P arming Cosa iasion meetingwill be mai ed to you on Fri ay, Kay 13. It is necessary that you, or an authorized representative, be present at the Architectural Review Committee meeting and the Planning Commission meeting. If you have any questions regarding this notice, please contact the Planning Department at 866-2140. Sincerely, l.1llkc.. / ARTHUR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR ld/lj 4or CITY OF CAMPBELL APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT BUSINESS NAME: .J UV D *6 R /V117 CIE&uTEA Date: V// z86 ADDRESS OF p,/ BUSINESS: _z23o 5, OlfS�a r� Telephone No.: 37/-%SdO OWNER/APPLICANT FAA N K C 1,111 Z % Telephone No.: 71- 3 9 ( ' zozs W1t145trg Si}N 7'-se C,4 Zip Code -7S'12 y SIGN COMPANY Telephone No.: Zip Code -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- ----- ----- --- ---- --- -- - - - - In accordance with Sections 21.68.030 and 21.68.110 of the Municipal Code of the City of Campbell, the undersigned hereby makes application for approval of the attached sign plan and agrees to abide by the Sign Regulations of the City and the conditions of approval for this application. Signature of Ap-plicant # Sfonature of Property Own SA PC - /-) Approved as presented Conditionally approved Denied ARTHUR A. KEE, PLANNING DIRECTOR by APR p 11986 CiTM pF CAMP9[LL MANNINO DCPANTMK"T TO: CITY CLERK PLEASE COLLECT AND RECEIPT FOR THE FOLLOWING MONIES ITEM PLANNING FILE NO.: ADDRESS: 22 ,5- S "/ ' AMOUNT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 0-1 acres $1,000.00 1-5 acres 1,300.00 5+ acres 2,000.00 ZONE CHANGE 0-1 acres 900.00 1-5 acres 1,000.00 5+ acres 1,500.00 TEXT AMENDMENT 400.00 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 0-2 acres 1,000.00 2-5 acres 1,300.00 5+ acres 1,500.00 (Modifications of Approval) 250.00 (Revised Development Schedule) 150.00 USE PERMIT Garage Conversions, Occupancy Requirement w/o Development Plans, Liquor Licenses, Secondary Dwelling Units, Interim Zone 350.00 All Other Use Permits 1,000.00 (Modifications or Amendments) 125.00 ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL 0-10.000 s.f. of construction 500.00 10,000-75,000 s.f. of construction 750.00 75,000+ s.f. of construction 1,000.00 If no construction associated w/ project 500.00 _ (Modifications) 125.00 (Extensions of Approval) 75.00 VARIANCES Single Family Residence 250.00 All Others 430.00 SIGN PERMITS - Permits - Minimum of $40 or 1% of estimated valuation 40.00 Penalty for not securing a permit 40.00 OTHER TOTAL NAME. n C / c : 1 . c� PHONE ADDRESS '� 0 2 C t.� l l v� �� _ ) ti ZIP --iS/2Y FOR RECEIPT NO. CITY CLERK AMOUNT PAID ONLY RECEIVED B1_ 0AIE