SDP 73-01CITY OF C'AMPBELL 1901 S . BASC'OM AVE. SDP 7 3 -1 1 of 3
F
r s
1901 S, faaNw 'y7 i <
freu N. Sahadi
0
S 11/1
s
MA.TM I - SOS •w ♦"
LOYM - Me0[[00110.�.•
r
U
M�
RESOLUTION NO. 14031
PLANNING COWIISSICN
CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
After notification and public hearing as specified by law cn the
application of Fred N. Sahadi for approval of plans to construct a
parking structure on property known as 1901 South Ba,co- Avenue in a
C-2-0 Zone, as per the application filed in the office of the Planning
Department on September 7, 1973, and after presentation by the Planning
Director, proponents, and opponents, the hearing was closed.
After due consideration of all evidence presented, the Corriission
did find as follows:
1. That after several continuances of said application,
applicant has failed to subnit revised plans for
presentation to the Planning Cornission. The application,
should, therefore, be removed fron 'he aaenda.
Based on the above findings, the Planning Con:aission does hereby
deny v'thout prejudice the application or Fred N. Sahadi for S.D.P. 73-1•
PASSED AND ADOPTED this Sth day of September, 1974, by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Hebard, Lubeckis, "ickson, Alexander, Samuelson,
Cook, Stewart
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: None
ATTEST:_ Arthur A. Kee
Secretary
APPROVED: Robert A. Stewar
Chairmar
I ten. p5
STAFF COMMENT SHEET - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 5, 1974
S.D.P. 73- 1 Continued public hearing on the application of
Sahadi, Fred N. Fred N. Sahadi for approval of plans to construct
a parking structure on property located at
1901 South Bascom Avenue in a C-2-0 Zone.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Denial without prejudice.
STAFF DISCUSSION:
This item has been on the agenda since the meeting of October 15. 1973.
The applicant has not indicated an intention to develop this structure at the
present time or in the immediate future; therefore, staff recommends that
this item be removed from the agenda.
i1,'4k46* °F
colluir'lle(I public
"
i Feed of Irci Squad i Rn approvoi c f pans I(,
C011SLI'l,cl ;I 11"371:i-r— !,,ructi,rc on Property
locvtcd r.j 19ol rn!;r,,vi Avenue in a
C-2-0 Zmic .
C h'! i I, ;,I-hed !:I . Kcc For hi!,
I ly is .1 cc)p,.;.,Ij;4-d 1,i0olic ],L.:-ring. Thc staff iF
rcL, itding Coll L iIIINInCt! to Z)lf' fi St 111"tili!; i.1( Sep-ci,,ber as
L of t
a re )iv r(,(iu(;St b)1 tilL. applicant.
C11.1 jj Stewp,,, I f.tltcd t1l, , ' tj,c applicant i: 10ul ilIg for somC
-ill, Ic:Iji;II pyo,,cctjolj jl,•�jjcy -,Ill(! has, there-
fore, requested t) 0 C01011,0,11147(7-
Commi6sjoncr SXALIVI.9011 tIc%-cti t1l;it ST)P 73-1 ;;ppj3cntion of Fred
S;111;1,1i , he c(,III jj:jit.d to the first riveting in S(Ipt(mbeT, Seconded
(1011ted.
i
I
1
I
coimni.::::ioncr Samuelson reported that tb.,
ittee recommends
approval faith the added condition that ;1`
ioral trees be.
placed 3o feet apart, or every third rai
rice. The coramit.toc
recognized thatthe bliildinl de,Jgo is c,,1'.
existing on the property and the comuaitl-
-i r11i :+ith :What is
applicant did
discuss the upgradiul; of the desiLn. Ian,
this would be
d'.ffilult, rc:c;,:izing the ecencncic. silo,.
as it is t.oclaq.
1
Chai i .:.i Si,,c . govstioned the requirern :
c ; a parcel map
and is I,,., .:Iri:.ed that the. Ar•sessor's records
indicate
mnrc t h:,n one I :u : el at this titac and tau ra;
cel map tacncld
incorporate t]u• pluperty into one Parcel.
rlr, Kv(e advised that. the landscc:pc• plan wmuld
come bar], to the
staft for ❑pp,cval.
Chairiaan Stcl•:art declared the public hearin open and ns):ed if
anyone wished to be he:ud.
)y�
y
e
d t
Item N6
STAFF COMMENT SHEET - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 6, 1974
SDP 73-1 Continued public hearing on the application of Fred Sahadi
Sahadi, Fred for approval of plans to construct a parking structure
on property iocated at 1901 South Bascom Avenue in a
C--2-0 Zone. (See attached letter).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Continuance to the first meeting in September.
STAFF DISCUSSION:
This item was continued from the Planning Commission meeting of March 7, 1974
for reasons of alternatives in design as well as recent decisions from the
Environmental Protection Agency with regard to parking areas.
The applicant is again requesting a continuance due to the recent decisions
of the Environmental Protection Agency. Staff would not see any difficulties
in granting an additional continuance of this item.
May 21, 1974
1 Mr. Art Kee
The City of Campbell
Planning Department
75 N. Central Avenue
Campbell, Calif. 93008
Dear Mr. Kee:
Please ex:end for 120 days the submission of our parking
structure proposal to the Planning Commission for decisions on
our part pending the outcome of Environmental Protection Agency
regulation changes.
Very truly ours,
Project Engineer
RM/kj
y -dAkw d—AIA—If dy
3!O. �.r..tsi .S°.«�.�..rB.ly6wwr.xsiso O�o.sav/a7s-nail
i
� II
i
Y
Spn 73-1 ��`� Ti�i i^ the tli- and Place for continued
Sahadi, F. �' rll� puUlic hearing on the application of Fred
Saha di for approval of plans to construct
a par7zjng structure on Property located
at 19ol S. Bascom Avenue in a C-2-0 Zone.
Mr. Kee advised that the applicant ha: contacted the staff and
requested a ninety day continuance and the staff has recommended
continuance to the first meeting in June.
Commissioner Cook moved that SUP 73-1 he continued to the first
mr.eting in June, seconded by col,missioucr !iickson and unanimously
adopted. -'ENNOW
I
I
STAFF COMMENI SHEET
- PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
'
OF MARCH 7, 1974
F
SDP 73-1
Sahadi, Fred
Continued public hearing on the application of Fred Sahadi
for approval of plans to construct a parking structure
on property located at 1901 South Bascom Avenue in a
C-2-0 Zone.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Continuance to the first meeting in June.
STAFF DISCUSSION:
This item was continued from the Planning Commission meeting of December 3,
1973, for reasons of alternatives in design as well as the recent rulings
of the Environmental Protection Agency with regard to parking areas. The
applicant has been in contact with the Planning Staff and requested a ninety
day continuance for the same reasons as given in December. STaff would not
see any difficulties in the granting of this continuance.
Item N1Q
STAFF CODIMENT SHEET - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF DECEMBER 3, 1973
SDP 73-1 Continued public hearing on the application of
Sahadi, Fred Fred N. Sahadi for consideration of a Special
Development Pcr:it to construct a parking
structure on pro,erty located at 1901 South
Bascom Avenue in a C-2-0 Zone. (See attached
letter).
STAFF ZECODII ENDATION:
Continuance to the first meetiu;. in "larch.
STAFF DISCUSSION:
This item was continued from the Planning Commission meeting of
November 5, 1973. The applicant has since notif°ed the Planning
Department that he is considering alternatives in design, as yell
as the recent rulings of the Environmental Protection Agency.
J
01
Novi;r13�r 14, 11173
c. o r
De- a r I. -
Pxirsl,,, , I r, - r, I , L, t cc, I.,. rs a 1, 3 o i, 1 t :,." ell 3.1 investi.ga-
tiov i r. j .:,' ;ii ui il- jjrrjji� - ( 11run, %,rd - Towers.
It al 1 l i t h v r (":' ;;n !-,2 r,,,rc: 4nv3l%.O(l
Char. i i, la,v3ly a: cipaLt r :it, ' v'i"1 have to
-r.r. t i I'm to pul . 1'c t F.Ilerliativc
t; L rol, 1 ll"s I have been ill
'h crh2tever th
e flu
rc:, �jjc C. •. lip, oi.e down, and have
gotter. very Id, Jo acc'(': sled.
To C'':.: 11 t: 7' new prui-c cc! Environmental
,,.,tions wc, !(i lbsolutely place
US 1:. th %coujd, of cojiree, compound
LbUt problem.
1' 0 r the ..Dove rc t ntinue out public
!'L:tril:;. Oil the , ;;e_L; c. so that the de.Sign
studits may be t pi the now elevations prepared and sub-
mitted to the pl J.Ji;i, :.,,ctor and the building department for
review. tl!,,*.. holic:a.,s coming up, nothink., ever Seems to get
Cone, as you well knon%
i J 'V il
CITY OF CAMPBELL
dy DZPARTMENr
Q
Mr. Arthur See
Page Two
November 14, 1973
I Lave di::cu:. wed tLu i.er; dt:cl. snd its location .� i tll Wally Byron !
in dutail ana lie Las approved the program in concept. As I
pointed out to you, the redesign is a little more involved than
I origin:,11y anticipated.
Thank you for your cc:.*inued cooperation.
Very Xruly ycufs
U,. n sAHAnl
rs/, c
cc: Wally Byron
Bob Dempster
SDP 73-1This is the time and plat- for cont,rm-A
Sahadi, [red puhlic hearing on the application o.
li-A Scibadi for a t
tc,constmc 1. 8 Pa. 3 t stroctul"
.-C,4ted at �qll S lidscom Aver,io in a r-2-0
1`V Zane.
Cornic Cr—: :r.ovpf7 tL.. DP 7,1-1 Le cnntinucd to the first
We L. .;r, sevoiA,sci by Coniriissio;,ex Lubccl--. and unard-
-I
0 1 1
ITEM N12
STAFF COMMENT SHEET - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF NOVEMBER 5, 1973
3DP 73-1 Continued public hearing on the application of
Sahadi, Fred N. Fred N. Sahadi for a Special Development Permit
to construct a parking structure on property
located at 1901 South Bascom Avenue in a
C-2-0 Zone.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That this item be continued to the first meeting in December.
STAFF DISCUSSION:
In accord with a request from the applicant and due to a possible
revision in the plan, the above recommendation in the staff's
opinion is justified.
The staff has been in contact with the applicant and is attempting
to resolve the issues that were raised at the last meeting.
can
SLP 73-1
This is
the time and place for
public _
' Sahadi, Fred N.
hearing
on the application of
rrcd N. Sahadi
•° *
for a SDccial
Development Permit
to con-
struct a
}arkir.,-, structure on
property located
'
at 1901
South Bascom Avenue in
a C-2-0 Zone.
Chairman Hebard
asked Mr. Kee
for his cort�ents.
Mr. Kee advised that the staff recon-ez:6ation is that this item
be removed from the agenda or continued until the applicant has
submitted a subdivision map which complies with the subdivision
ordinance of the City of Campbell.
Chairman Hebard declared the public hearing open and asked if
anyone wished to be heard.
Mr. rred N. Sahadi, applicant, stated t?.at there is a question
in his mind as to whcther or not the ordinance in question, which
Mr. Kee has referred to as the basis for the continuance recommen-
dation, applies. lie did not think that it is something that should
take the Commission's time. There is some language in the ordinance
to indicate that it does apply and sons that it does not apply.
The parcels were created to accommodate the tax assessor's office
and have no other purpose. He asked that the Commission consider
the parking, structure and the Planning :)irector, City Attorney and
other department heads could meet and resolve this problem. This
would save the matter from coming back to the Commission again.
He stated that he would be agreeable to having the matter continued,
however, he did not think that it should require a whole lot of
activity. Ile stated that they could approve it or deny it subject
to the City Attorney, Building Official, and Planning Director
being satisfied. In his opinion, it was merely an interpretation
of the language of the code.
Mr. Kee stated that the staff is prepared to recoum.end approval
of the parking structure. The plans he-.- been circulated to the
various departments, but their comments have not been included in
the staff report.
Chairman Hebard stated that he was concerned with the parking structure
-12-
and he asked how the Commissioners .nit about it. The consensus
of opinion was to the
that the parking structure pl.tns should be :thieved.
Commissiuner Alexander moveddohnotat shaveDP 3the completeued staff re?ort
next regular meeting. ) a,.view Cor.mittee and
and the recommendation of the Architectural con -
Architectural Advisor and on that basis 'le would nove for
tinuance. Motion seconded by Commissioner Stewart and unanimously
adopted. �__-
ITFtl 7-
1
STAFF COMMENT SHEET -PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF OCTOBEk,15, 1973
SDP 73-1 Publ:- hearing on the application of Fred N.
Sahadi, Fred N. Sahadi for a Special Development Permit to
construct a parking structure on property located
at 1901 S. Bascom Avenue in a C-2-0 zone.
(See map attached).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That this item be removed from the agenda or continued until the
applicant has submitted a subdivision map wllicll complies with the
subdivision ordinance of the City of Campbell.
STAFF DISCUSSION:
This proposal is for a one-story parking structure which would
cover approximately 78,000 square feet of the existing parking
area at the northwest corner of the Prune Yard development just
north of the Towers. The proposal would provide for approxi-
mately 238 additional parking sPacts. It is the staff's opinion
that the parking structure is desirable, particularly when viewed
in relation to the successful nature of this commercial center.
The staff connot recommend approval, however, due to the fact
that some fourteen parcels have been created according to the
assessor's maps since 1969 without meeting requirements of the
Campbell Municipal Code; specifically, the subdivision ordinance
which requires city approval for the creation of such parcels.
In regard to this project, Section 20.041.030 of the Subdivision
Ordinance reads in part as follows:
..No building permit or any other kind of permit issued by the
City shall be issued to any applicant to be used in connection
with or pertaining to any premises or portion thereof which has
at any time been subdivided in violation of this title and not
corrected as provided in ibis title. The enforcement of the
provisions of this section shall be in addition to any other
remedy or penalty provided by law for violation of this title."
Fred N. Sahadi
1901 S. Bas.:om Avenue
,-.impbell...CA ---
- SDP 73-1 --- - — ------Sept. 7, 1913
$50 _ -Sept. 7, 1973
-•---;'::'.c i,i.;�F.J;i"-. October 15 1973
�.... ., 0!' i'U:1, ('. i:iJ.:.l;::; }." (. •'i 'i i 4•i;: (:1L
To
November 14, 1973
Mr. Arthur Kee
Planning Director
City of Campbell
75 N. Central Avenue
Campbell, California 95008
Dear Art:
Pursuant to our last conversation, I have undertaken an invest . -
tion of a redesign of the proposed deck for The PruneYard - Towers.
It appears that the redesign program is materially more involved
than I had originally anticipated and as a result, I will have to
have an additional amount of time to pursue that alternative.
Compounding that problem has been the fact that I have been ill
almost continually for the last thirty days with whatever the flu
is that seems to be around, one day up, one day down, and have
gotten very little accomplished.
To further compound the problem, the new proposed Environmental
Protection Agency's rules and regulations would absolutely place
us in baLkruptcy and the proposed deck would, of course, compound
that problem.
For the above reasons, I will ask that you continue our public
hearing on the proposed deck for ninety days so that the design
studies may be completed and the new elevations prepared and sub-
mitted to the planning director and the building department for
review. With tho holidays coming up, nothing ever seems to get
done, as you well know.
FCEI �
'JOb' 1 L 1913
:ITY OF CAMPBELL
•S ` PLANNING DEPARTMRNT
Srd 9rt.I.' �' 9YAihryit-�1w.,N«ww .QI:.! �iwy{
.ssi .� A+..B.ly6«.:.sisiso O�Jie.scw/els-cwii
Mr. Arthur Kee
Page Two
November 14, 1973
1 I have discussed the new deck and its location with Wally Byron
in deteil and he has approved the program in concept. As I
pointed out to you, the redesign is a little more involved than
I had originally anticipated.
Thank you for your continued cooperation.
i Ver rul�yo
�1
RED SAHADI
FS/sc
cc: Wally Byron
Bob Dempster
1
c
a
�i
J' ,
October 11, 1973
M E M O
TO: Arthur Kee, Planning Director
FROM: William G. Wren, Director of Public Works
RE: "SDP" 73-1
The area encompassed by the proposed structure appears to include
more than one parcel as reflected by the County Assessor's Rolls
dated March, 1973.
A review of the City's records and earlier Assessor's Rolls
indicates that the shopping center area has apparently been
divided into several parcels without adhering to the City and
State regulations regarding subdivisions of land. Accordingly,
it would seem that the City should take the necessary actions
to insure conformity with these regulations.
The records indicate that as a condition of Special Development
Permit No. 7 granted in November, 1971, a parcel map was required
to define the proposed lines in the v..cinity of the ten -story
building. The Building Permit was released in March, 1972; and
the parcel map has not been submitted to date.
WILLIAM G. WREN,
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
' A
ByBill M. Helms,
Associate Civil Engineer
BMH: is
-"A
9:
J+jS�
f 'Yll Ii OF THE k-0I LOOS SA."'A C'LARA VALLEY!"
75 NORTH CENTPAL AVENUE • CAMPBE LL, CALIFOlyNDMEMLEPHONE (408) 378-8141
F L E D
1973
JOHN KA7UBOWSKi, Clark
By M. LOMAS
-UWForm EIR-3 oFile 0 SDP 73-1
DECLARATION THAT AN ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPOIT I3 NOT REQUIRED
(NEGATIVE DECLARATION)
APPLICANT Fred N. Sahadi
ADDRESS 1901 S. Bascom Ave.
PROJECT NAME: parking structure
1901 S. Bascom Ave.
ADDRESS
Campbell. Californ� V
Pursuant to the applicable sections of the California Environmental
Quality Act. of 1970 and City of Campbell Resolution No. 3485; and
After review of plans and information supplied by the applicant
pertaining to the captioned project, the undersigned does hereby
determine that the captioned project will have no significant
effect (no substantial adverse impact) on the environment within
the terms cnd meaning of said Act and Resolution.
Executed at Campbell, California, this 26 day of Sept.
19% 3
fil 9
Director or
Official
By,_��y�.ylann�r 1
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
12p15.5 C,C.PI
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
Ctmnty of Santa Clara
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of 11,
County aforesaid. 1 am over the age of eighteen years, and
not a party toor interested in the above -entitled matter. I am
the principal clerk of the printer of the
CAMPBELL PRESS
. I
a newspaper of general circulation printed and published
weekly in the City of Campbell, in said County of Santa Clara,
State of California, that said Campbell Press is and was at all
times hereinafter mentioned, a newspaper of general cir-
culation as that term is defined by Section MBO of the
Political code. and that prior to July 1, 1952, it was issued by
the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. Decree Number
84019 establishing it with such status as a newspaper of
general circulation; that at all timics .aid newspaper has
born established, printed and published in the said City of
Campbe, . in said County and State, at regular intervals for
more than one year preceding the first publication of the
notice herein mentioned; that said notice was set in type not
smaller than nonpareil, and was preceded with words printed
in black face type not smx!:�i loa: nonpareil, has been put
fished in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and
not in any supplement thereof on, the following dates, to wit:
C`ctoc,r �
all In the year 1971
I certify or derlarei under penalty of perjury that the
forei;uing Is true and correct.
Dated at Campbell. California, this
3rd of Cctobir 19 ';.3
Signature
This space is for the County Clerk's
Filing Stamp
Pt_ C_,
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF
' r9
1 1 ascom :.vs.
NOTICE OF NEAEINO
Notice Is hereby 91'" that
mIe PlanningCommensrbonmof ,the
Ia), of CmPhedseYt mherr
CS. Ie], is, Ma Ciry Nan Conn
Ane rrs m CMmal
nCimPpN
N
me time and Place for Plinnc
Fe 9 On thres N Sabedtel•r .pl,caibn OI
velepmam fp•ci•1 U!.
Perms re cansfruct
Pe tip structure aP woperty 10.
'oleo at sec rD so
Bascom
Mep ass legal �es:.'PIr W
.ublect PmPlrlr file the
Office Of the Planning oa
Penmen', rs Norm Central
Avenue. Campbell, C•Ilbnn{a.
l nlereeted pe"one may
.Poster and he rNrd ar sees
"or;-
CITY OF CAMPBELL
PLANNING COMMISSION
All —A. Kee, secretary
Pub Oct. J, Iel] aI-CP
1
CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
state of California )
) ss
County of Santa Clara)
I, //g, of said County being duly
sworn deposes and says: That I am and at all times hereafter
mentioned was a citizen of the United States; over the age
of twent -one (21) years; and that on the Z( day of
''- --' 197 3 , I duly posted an exact and
true copy of:
Notice of public hearing, on the applicatin of Fred N. Sahadi
for a special development permit to construct a parking structure
on property located at 1901 South Bascom Avenue in a C-2_0_Zone.
S i FT10 i. ure
Attested to and .^..wort, to before me this
- day of — .f._.__ �_+ 197_-
Ciiy Cler}:/Ticpnty CCty Clcrl---�—�
C3ty of CempLell, C+:Iiforni.
f
J, 71e
September 13, 1973
Mr. Art Kee
Planning Commission
City of Campbell
75 N. Central Ave.
Campbell, Calif. 95008
RE: Parking Structure
Dear Mr. Kee:
F
The drawings reflect a 24' ile due to existing curb cuts and
positioning of the parking structure in the northwest corner which
is not 900. We ask this variance to match the south side edge of
the structure directly over an existing marked parking lane so as
not to effect the stripping in the adjoining area for some distance
�
south toward and around Towers I.
Very truly yours,
MAT S50
RM/kj
a
1
�i.1 .�ri.i' it glWi�pf->>ew..lY�w..r .II'id r8owyte.y,
'I
t
L_
FILz�:
P
APPLICATION FOR
SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT `
�':,• " t� -_ a 11` �a�i PLANNING MMISSION
CITY OF 001PBELL, CALIFORNIA ''L-A"""
APPLICANT'S NMIE Ilan i :. ' DATE Ci/71�73
ADDRESS
PROPERTY %: !; l '?A,"ri:' ✓�✓ ,r=��'�','Jr[ L
ADDRESS
nsert or attac written ega escript n
PROPOSED USEI� ��� Zo �Y�iC.
.7 R
appvicant may file written statement ol uses app ie or)
STATEd1ENT _ �� '"
(applicant may attac statement justifying app ication
1. Applicant must attach copies of the required plans
indicating all information required on the attached sheet.
2. The application shall be accompanied by a $50.00 filing fee.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPLICATION:
I/We, the undersigned person(s) having an interest in the above
described property hereby make application for a Special Development
Permit as hereinabov., set forth, in accordance with the provisions of
Sections 21.40.050 throigh 21.40.1nn of Chapter 21.40.
Campbell ,Municipal Code, and I/t:'e hereby certify that the information
given herein is true and correct to the best of my/our knowledge.
Respectfully submitted,
Filed in the Office of the �r2
Planning Department on1✓.
(S gnatyre)yAad�, ���✓
1By ress
�7-
�'�A� D ate
I
t;
INFORMATION FOR PERSONS APPLYING FOR
'--5F1C1�1L►iE�la.c)P?If:,\Y' PLfL�I'i�
SECTION 21.40.020PERMIT REQUIRED. No use shall be estab-
lished upon property in any zoning district with which the "0"
district is combined unless special development permit is first
issued by the City Council.
SECTION 21.40.OSO USES TO COMPLY NI.TH PEMMIT.
Following issuance of a permit.
a. No use shall be established or any building or
structure constructed or altered, upon property in any district
with which an "0" district is combined except in strict conformity
with the permit.
b. No use shall be established or changed, or any
building or structure constructed or altered, in a manner which
would not comply with the regulntions of 'tile
zoning district with
which the "0" district is combined except for the modificatio±,
specifically authorized by the "0" district regulations, in strict
conformity with the permit issued and all conditions or require-
ments attached 'thereto.
SECTIOPj 21.40.040 PEPMIT CO`JDI1 IONS.
In connection with the issuance of any special development
permit, the City Council may attach such conditions or requirements
in addition to those expressly provided for in this chapter, the
Subudivision chapter, or other applicable provisions of the Campbell
Municipal Code, as the City Council, finds necessary to attain :hc
objectives and purposes of this section, or to insure that the
general appearance of the buildings or structures, or the uses
to be made of the property to which the application refers, will
not impair either the orderly development of, or the existing uses
being made of adjacent properties.
SECTION 21.40.OSO PEPWIT: APPLICATION.
Applications for a special development permit shall be filed
with the Planning Department on forms furnished for this purpose,
'and shall be accompanied by payment of the fee of $25.00.
SECTION 21.40.060 SUMMISSION OF PLAN: CONTENTS.
A site development or similar plan shall be submitted in
connection with each application of such scale and in such number
Li
12
;.
of copies as may be required containing sufficient information to
4
Identify the foIlou1ng:
a. Each proposed use.
b. Location and type of:
1. Proposed buildings and structures including
height, exterior elevations, and types of
exterior materials and colors;
2. traffic and pedestrian ingress and egress and
circulation;
3. off-street parking and loading facilities;
4. easements;
S. signs may be erected in accordance with the
provisions of Section 9330 through 9330.8;
6. landscaping including tree preservation;
7. exterior lighting;
S. walls and fences or other devices used for
screening or separation;
9. property boundary lines; and
10. proposed reshaping of the earth, together with
any other supporting data required by the
Director of the Planning Department.
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, PLANNING
COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL.
The architectural review eonmittee shall consider each appli-
cation, together with a report thereon from the Director of the
Planning Department and shall report its findings and recommendations
concerning each application to the Planning Commission. The
Planning Commission shall report its findings and recommendations
to the City Council prior to the dates upon which the City Council
shall hear and determine such application.
SECTION 21.40.070MILN USE PERMIT NOT REQUIRLD: VARYING
CERTAIN REQUIREMENTS: NOTICE PUBLICATION
AND POSTING REQUIRi:U.
II
a. No Use Permit, otherwise required by the regulations of
the zoning district with which an "0" District is combined, shall
-2-
J
be required for uses, or buildings or structures, permitted in
an approved special development permit.
b. At the time of aplroving a special development permit
the City Council nay allow lot area, lot width, open space and
yard, height, and parkinE space requirements varying from'and
different than those which would otherwise apply in the zoning
district with which the "0" District is combined.
e. Notice of the time and place of any public hearing in
connection with the granting or revocation of a special develop-
ment permit shall be given by one publication at least ten (10)
days prior to such hearing, in a newspaper of general circulation
in the City designated for that purpose by the City Council, and
notice of the application shall be posted on the property to which
the application applies, ten (10) days prior to said hearing.
,SECTION 21.40.0.80 PERMIT; WHEN VOID.
An approved special development permit shall expire and
become null and void if the permit has not been used within one
(1) year after the date such permit was approved. Commencement
of construction of the buildings or structures, or the establish-
ment of the use, u-hich are the subject of the pernit, shall consti-
tute commencement of the use of the permit, but such commencement
must be brought to completion within one year from issuance of
the permit unless the time is ex tended by the Ctiy Council on
showing of good cause.
SECTION 21.40.090 PERMIT; REVOCATION
A special development permit may be revolved by the City Council
after a public hearing thereon when the City Council finds a
vioJation of, or a non-compliance with the conditions, or any of
them of the granting of the permit.
SECTION 21.40.100 EXCEPTIONS
An exception to any or all of the conditions or requirements
of the "0" District may be recommended by the Planning Conmission
and granted by the City Council upon the written aPplfcat. of
the owner of property in any zoning district with which an "0"
District is eonbined, provided that the Planning Commission and
the City Council each find and determine that the special conditions
and situations no longer exist which resulted in the addition of an
overlay district designation to the zoning district in which the
property was placed, that the exception is necessary for the preser-
vation and cnjoyrient of a substantial property right of the appli-
cant, and the granting of the exception will not be materially detri-
mental to the public welfare or injurious to other property,
improvements or uses within the immediate vicinity of and within
the same zoning district as the property which is the subject of
the application.
-3-
L� J
■
Cla:'I'3'f. FCR I!;
I'FG:CC.3 BiiIC}; ! :•.'; i1Ll'I: A
STG:SIPICht•, I:.:TAL I}:PACT
An.w,r t::c :ollowiny, cuestlons by placing a check in the
appro,riate Brace.
Yes
1. Could the project si,nificantly change present
uses of the project area?
2. Could the project significantly chance present
uses of land outside the rroject area?
3. Could the project affect the use of a recre-
ational area or area of important aesthetic
value?
4. Could the project substantially affect the
functioning of an established community?
5. Could the project result in the displacement of
community residents?
G. Are any of the natural or nan-made features in
the project area unique, that ir, not found in
other parts of the county? _-
7. Could the project significantly affect a known
historical or archaelogi.cal site or its setting?
8. Could the project sinnficantly affect the po-
tantial use, extraction, or conservation of a
natural resource? --
9. Does the project area serve as a hal,i.tat, food
source, nestinn place, source of water, etc, for
rare or cnr,annercd wildlife or fish spocies?
10'. Could the rroject significantly afrcct fish,
wildlife, or plant lire?
11. Gre there .:ny rar: or cnda,gcred pla.,t species
in the projCCt area?
12. Could the project result in the erosic•r. of
outside prorerty'
-1 G-
FILL
S.-
v
fr
R
13. Will the Project require a variance from estab-
lishc environmental standards (air, water,
noise, etc), and/or adopted plans?
1y, ••ill t:.•: • r. jcct reru: a certification, author-
ization or issuance of a permit by any local.
state, or federal environmental control agency?
If so, please indicate name of the agency
ct involve the application, use
x.
::o
V
15. will ,nc proic
or disposal of hazardous materials?
16. Will the project involve construction of t
facilities in a flood plain?
17. will the project involve construction of
facilities in the area of a known active `
fault?
is. Could the completed project result in the `
generation of significant amounts of noise? _
19. Could the construction of the project result
in the generation of significant amounts Of `
dust?
20. Could the completed project result in the v
generation of significant amounts of dust?
2l. Could the project result in a significant change
in the quality of any portion of the region's
air or water resources? (Should note surface,
ground water, offshore.) — —
-11-
.
-J
State lent of No Si,,.iificant
Environmental EffEcts
If you have answered yes to
one or more of the questions in
Section II, but still think
that the project will have no
significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below.
Address of project
Date su mitted
I
Applicants name
_}Yf
_
Appl cants signature
"a
a
a
r
�I
J
CITY OF CAMPBELL, 1901 S. BASCOM AVE. SDP 73-1 2 of 3
CITY ()F CAMPBl.LL 1901 S. BASCYlM AVE. SDP 73-1 3 of 3