UP 77-06CTTY OF CAMPBELL 2175 S. BASCOM AVE. UP 77-6
i
UP 77-G V-{ 1 The is the time and place for public hearing to consider
I
i
i
L
Madden, hark S.h ) the application of Mark S. Iladdei, D.V.M., for a use
D.V.M. N permit and approval of plans to convert a residence i to
a veterinary hospital on prepzrty known as 2175 South
Bascom Aver re in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning
District.
Chairman Dickson asked Commissioner Campos for the Architectural Review Committee
recommendation.
Commi,sioner Campos stated that the committee reviewed this application and was
of the opinion that the conversion was an improvement. The conmritcee recunrnends
approval subject to the attached conditions.
Mr. Kee stated that the staff recommends continuance of the "S" approval in order
that revised plans may be submitted. He presented an aerial map showing the
location of the property and the buildings on the property. The application is
for the conversion of a residence to a veterinary hospital for one doctor. The
property is zonr_d C-2-S and is bounded by a nursery school to the south, swim
school to the v.est, and a paint store to the north. The C-2-S Zoning District
provides for a veterinary clinic and the conditional use permit provides for
a conversion of a residential structure, including but not limited to architecture,
dentistry, enginopring, law and medicine. It is the staff's opinion that the
application cuuLI represent a desirable conversion to a professional office.
Staff ra onmends approval of `he use permit, and continuance of the architectural
approval so revised plans can be submitted.
-13-
Chairman Dickson declared the public hearing open and asked if anyone wished
to speak for or against the dpplication.
Mrs.Gretchen I•lack, 973 Apricot Avenue, presented a petition signed by several
people living on Apricot opposing the proposed veterinary hospital. She stated
that the people do not want such a usc. The location is too cic , to their homes
and businesses. She asked what the rules are for veterinary hospitals with
regard to close proximity to residences and if there was a land requirement for
such a use. She cited barking dogs, odors, traffic as reasons for opposing
the requested use. She did not believe that this use was compatible with the
surrounding uses.
Comnissioner Lubeckis stated that he has been dealing with veterinary hospitals
for many years and they are very quiet. It is the boarding plans that are
noisy as they take care of healthy dogs. He would definitely object to a
boarding facility, but would support a veterinary hospital.
Commissioner Hebard stated that what is being proposed is an animal hospital
and the animals will be kept 41side. He asked Mr. Kee if there were veterinary
hospitals in the City of Campbell where there are no animals kept outside.
Mr. Kee mentioned several along Winchester Boulevard end Hamilton Avenue.
Commissioner Campos stated that the applicant indicated that the outside may
be used during the recovery period under the direct supervision of the doctor
or the people in attendance. This would be for a brief period in order to
exercise the animal.
Mr. Kee stated that there is nothing on the plans to indicate outdoor runs.
The plans do show an enclosed area to the front of the property immediately
adjacent to Bascom Avenue. It is enlcosed by a six foot high wall.
Mrs. liack stated there is not enough parking for the people who come there to
leave their animals.
Chairrin Dickson advised that the application will provide for the proper
amount of parking for the facility.
Mrs. Mack stated the area is primarily residential with nursery school and
swim school adjacent and the noise of barking dogs and odors would be intolerable.
Commissioner Hebard stated that firs. Mack has been speaking of this being a
residential r..^ighhorhood. This piece of property is surrounded by commercial
uses, commercial to the north, south, and to the crest.
There was discussion as to the number of dogs allowed in the R-1 Zone and the
number of dogs allowed in the veterinary hospital. This would be controlled
by the use permit.
Connissioner Pack asked if the ordinance required any distance or separation
between a veterinary hospital and a residential area.
Mr. Kee stated that it did not.
-14-
AYES: Commissioners: Hebard, Campos, Vierhus, Pack, Samuelson, Lubeckis,
and Dickson.
NOES: Commissioners: None.
ABSENT: Commissioners: None.
"S" 77-13 Public hearing to consider the application of Mr. T. E.
Burke, T. Burke, on behalf of the Campbell Community Hospital, for
Campbell Community approval of plans to allow construction of a medical -dental
lrspital building on property known as 18 Cast Hamilton Avenue in
a P-F (Public Facilities), P-0 (Professional Office), and
R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zoning.Districts.
Commissioner Campos advised that the Architectural Review Committee discussed the
application of Mr. T. E. Burke and was of the opinion that the building was
acceptable, but there wds concern expressed about the preservation of some of the
redwood trees in the area. Also, the applicant was requesting a continuance in
order to submit revised plans on the parking. The committee recommends continuance
for two weeks.
Commissicner Vierhus moved that "S" 77-13 be continued to the April 19, 1977,
meeting, seconded by Commissioner Pack.
Chairman Dickson stated that the Commission has heard the concerns of the residents
and he requested that any resident wishing to he notified when the plans are
reviewed to leave their names with the recording secretary. Motion adopted
unanimously.
Chairman Dickson declared a recess at 9:00 p.m. Meeting reconvened at 9:15 p.m.
UP 77-6 The is the time and place for public hearing to consider
Madden, Mark S. the application of Mark S. Madden, D.V.M., for a use
D.V.M. permit and approval of plans to convert a residence into
a veterinary hospital on propert known as 2175 South
Bascom Avenue in a C-2-S (General (,ommercial) Zoning
District.
Chairman Dir!.son asked Commissioner Campos for the Architectural Review Comnittee
recommendation.
Commissioner Campos stated that the committee reviewed this application and was
of the opinion that the conversion was an improvement. the committee recommends
approval subject to the attached conditions.
Mr. Kee stated that the staff recommends continuance of the "S" approval in order
that revised plans may be submitted. He presented an aerial map showrig the
location of the property and the buildings on the property. The application is
for the conversion of a resid,^nice to a vet^rinary hospital for one doctor. The
property is zoned C-2-S an.l is bound.d by a nursery school to the south, swim
school to the vwost, and a paint store to the north. The C-2-S lolling District
provides for a veterinary clinic and the conditional use permit provides for
a conversion of a residential struc.lm a, including but not limited to architecture,
dentistry, engineering, law and medicine. It is the staff's opinion that the
application could reprosent a desir:blr conversion to a professional office.
Staff reconriond, approval of the u,o penmiit and continuance of the architectural
approval so revised plan, cdn Le submitted.
-13-
Mr. Howard Barnett, 961 Apricot, stated that he did not know what is proposed
for the back of the lot and he asked that the Commission have the true picture
before they make a judgment. Ile was of the opinion that the use was not
compatible with the area and it would be wrong to allow it.
Mr. Kee presented the plans again for review and stated that the rear portion
of the property does not indicate a use and it was indicated to the applicant
that he will have to show the use intended for the rear area. The Architectural
Advisor does have someconcerns and it is recommended that the site approval be
continued, depending upon whether or not the Commission makes a determination
on the use permit.
Chairman Dickson asked if anyone else wished to speak for or against the
application.
Dr. Madden, 4629 ilia Circle, San Jose, applicant, stated that there will be. a
12 foot driveway on either side of the house from Bascom Avenue to the parking
in the back, which has seven parking spaces. In reply to Mrs. Mack's concerns,
he stated that a modern veterinary hospital is strictly a medical and surgical
facility. The animals will be kept over night if need be, but as little as
possible as he felt that an animal makes a better recovery at home. The rear
portion of the lot has fruit trees and they intend to keep them. They intend
to leave this area for future parking, if needed. With regard to the noise
factor, he stated that there is more noise coming fromm the swim school than
from any of the veterinary hospitals in the Santa Clara Valley that he knows
of. Some are in shopping ce,iters that back up to residential areas. It was
discussed at the meeting that morn`ng that there would be a small area in the
front enclosed with a six foot ')I.ck wall which would be used for exer,ising
the animals. Odor will not be a problem. Odor is something that goes along
with lack of sanitation, which is totally against the whole concept of veterinary
medicine
Mr. Wm. Pierce, 934 Apricot, stated he would concur with Mrs. Mack. There
are other places in the City that would be more practical for such a use.
Chairman Dickson asked Dr. Madden there would be any problem with the dogs
being bothered by the nursery school.
Dr. Madden stated that he did not see any problem with the noise from the swim
school or nursery school. There would be a six inch concrete block wall which
has excellent sound proofing qualities.
Commissioner Pack asked Dr. Madden to speak on the intensity of the use. How
many doctors will practice there and how many animals will be kept?
Dr. Madden stated that he will be the sole practitioner and very probably at
the maximum he r ald see between 20 and 25 animals per day, including those
being treated on an out -patient basis. Hospital treatment would possibly be
nine to ten animals.
Commissioner Pack asked if the ordinance had a limitation as to the number of
animals that can be kept overnight.
Mr. Kee stated that in a commercial zone there was no limitation.
Conmissioner Pack asked if they could put a time limitation on the use permit
-is-
City Attorney Dempster advised that the use permit application is for the
conversion of a residence to a veterinary hospital. The Commission would not
be giving a use p=rm't for permission to use the land for a hospital. It would
be difficult to grant a use permit to convert a residence and then tell the
applicant that he could convert it for a limited time. It would be a permanent
conversion.
Commissioner Hebard stated that it was decided when the zoning was placed on
the property that a veterinary hospital would be allowed. They are talking
about the conversion of a residence.
For clarification to the people in the audience, City Attorney D_mpster
explained that the land is zoned to allow the requested use ar,d the Planning
Conmission is being requested to give consideration to the conversion of a
residential building to a veterinary hospital. lhere is no way the Planning
Commission could stop the applicant from building a new veterinary hospital
on the property, but they can say that he cannot use the existing building.
Mrs. Mack asked if the Planning Conrnission listens to complaints after something
is put in.
Mr. Dempster advised that if something begins to become a nuisance, regardless
of what it is, the residents have a right to complain to the proper authorities
in the City. The Planning Commission does not handle nuisance complaints unless
it ++ould go to a public hearing.
Mr. KertKirkorian, 1820 West Campbell Avenue, stated that he was in attendance
for another matter, however, he would like to state that he knc c of at least
three existing hospitals, ore in Saratoga adjacent to homes valaed at 90 to
100 thousand, one in Kirkwood Shopping Center, which is completly enclosed with
no outside facilities, and it is very successful. He stated that their offices
are adjacent to this hospital an; they have yet to (rear a dog bark.
Commissioner Lubeckis moved that the public hearing be closed, seconded by
Commissioner Pack and unanimously adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 1589 Commissioner Campos moved that the Planoing Commission
adopt Resolution No. 1589 approving UP 77-6, application
of Mark S. Madden, D.V.M., subject to the condition that
the applicant secure site and architectural approval and
that the use permit shall expire one year from the date
of approval of the use permit if construction has not
started.
Chairman Dickson asked if there was any discussion on the motion.
Commissioner Hebard stated that he was not comfortable that this animal hospital
does comply with the ordinance for conversions. Conversion to an office use is
primarily a pretty passive use and to convert a residence into a veterinary hospital
seems to be a much greater conversion than to simple office use. in order to do
so, there are going to have to be some very strict conditions placed on the site
approval.
Mr. Kee stated that there have been other conversions - one residence converted
to a restaurant, which is a couunercial use.
Commissioner Pact, stated that the Architectural Review Conuaittec was not in
eomplct� agreement with the elevation plans as subi�d tted and that is why they
recommended continuance..
Vote on the motion:
AYES: Commissioners: Campos, Vierhus, Pack, Samuelson, Lubeckis, and Dickson.
NOES: Commissioners: Hebard.
ABSENT: Conmrissioners: None.
I
;z.�a
Item k8
STAFF COMMENT SHEET - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 5, 1977
UP 77-6 Public hearing to consider the application of Mark S. Madden,
D.V.M., for a use permit and approval of plans to convert
Madden, Mark, D.V.M. a residence into a veterinary hospital on property known
as 2175 S. Bascom Avenue in a C-2-S (General Commercial)
Zoning District. (See map and applicant's statement attached).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approval subject to the following conditions:
1. Applicant to secure Site and Architectural.
2, The use permit shall expire one year from the date of approval of the use
permit if construction has not started.
STAFF DISCUSSION:
The applicant is proposing to convert an existing residence :t. a veterinary
clinic for one doctor. The applicant has filed for "S" approval which is also
on this agenda. The property is zonee C-2-5 and is bounded by a nursery school
to the south, swim school to the west, and a paint store to the north.
The C-2-S Zoning District provides for a veterinary clinic and the conditional
use permit section provides for a conversion of a residential structure,
including but not limited to architecture, dentistry, engineering, law, and
medicine. It is the staff's opinion that the subject application could represent
a desirable conversion to a professional office.
.'1.1 • .. � :'A ", 1, t,r f-. ., ..
AK .
' 2E38 I
i I
CAM PRELL v a P.M. ,; 'a AVF oY'+ wr Is
Y 326•M-20 -a, ir•u „>- P.L',?92M 37'P.M. 286-M•2:
�CCL.1
ul
98
#9t.` 2T a. 1j• rrL 1
i
"tom:^ ..
^,�
eo•:,.r_i� —
l LIT 113
09.7Ac w:._-MICHAEL �-------
n V F..
� - u
4 p.. 5 1-
Q 6
n. t� II .. V
f' I }
//4 rPCL1 /GsJ�J Ia B2 I
1/S ^iiCL2 IL = u B3
2L '+
t•"o as O ?
1 PCL n 32S' Ac NET. v C)
Y ki
1.097 AC NET ti
i O-1 0 72 4 c m '
" °'• ,•
r
63 ai o
/!8 G/ t98 77--/o-
NA; C H A E 29,
L DR _ 60 -09 --
s
24'. T_ t. 27 20 29 39 31�I 32 1 Lt c f
k L2
2^
20
l - , I
4
-- . J. Pi2iCQT
A
I
JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
The ever increasing population growth of Santa
Clara Valley gives rise to the need for more quality veterin.:-y
services. the large area to the east and southeast of Bascom
Avenue is primarily residential and completely devoid of
veterinary hospitals. There is very little chance of the
establishment of veterinary services in this area because
of the prohibitive zoning restrictions in the surrounding
communities. Therefore, the future Bascom Animal Hospital
will draw clientele and revenue from ti•e surrounding com-
munities into the city of Campbell.
The existing single family dwelling of the property
is exceptionally well built by todays standards. With the
proposed internal and external remodeling, the house can be
renovated into an attractive "modern veterinary hospital."
The planned remodeling and landscaping will be an attractive
I addition to the South Bascom Avenue business district.
Modern veterinary hospitals are totally contained
within the walls of the hospital. There will be no outsida
runs or kennels; and there will be no boarding or grooving.
Therefore, the noise and odor factors associated with outdoor
I runs and kennels as seen in many bonrdint- kennels will be
( totally eliminated. The animals kept overnight will be
`I strictly medial and surgical patients.
! An equally important factor of this property is
its centralized location in the Santa Clara Vall,�y. I am one
of the few veterinarians in the Bay Area with a special
Interest in the treatment of repti-::s and amphibians. These
animals are becomin:* more popular as pets, especially to the
growing number of people who live in apartments or rentals
which usually do not allow dogs or cats.
Date:
Signature:`
Mar. Madden, D.V.M.
•-.'ALL
+i.At: t:It:l• UAL': '.iN ENT
E
F
� l
i
L
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
I20I5..-rVA P.I
.STA'ry OF l'A1,1FORN'IA.
e'ounly of Santa (Tara
I am a citizen of the United Slates and a n'sideul
of the I'ounly aforesaid; 1 am over the age of
eighteen years, and nut a party to or interested to
flip above -entitled matter. I am the principal
clerk or the printer of the
('AMP( E'Ll. PRESS
.illon Avenue. Camphell, l alfforaia, !t news-
paper or general circulation, printed and puh-
lished every Wednesdav in the city of l anupbell,
t ouuly of Santa I'lara; and which newspaper has
been adjudged a newspaper of general :ircefa-
lion by the Superior ('hurl of the 1'ounly of Santa
f lara. State of Ualifornia. lease Number glf':K:
that the notice of which the auneli d Is a prift, d
c npy Iset in ly pe not smaller than non-pareiU,
has been published in each regular and entire
i,sue of said newspil and nnl is anv suppl,•-
iovnf (herrmf on tilt- following tlel^s. In wit
fill in the vear 19 77
I certif: lot, declare) under prnaltt of priji-
that the foregoing Is true and currcel.
(tailed at ('amphell, t'atlforula, this
'7'A _ Df M . . . h .:If 77 �
Signature
r
('Ills 'pact, is the County
flock's Filing Stamp
AD# 101—CP
PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF
NOTICE OF HEARING
Notice is hereby given that
the Nanning Crvronission of
the City of Ca o"I hill sat
the hour of 7.30 P.m. on
T—day. APnI 5. 1977, in the
City Ham Council Chanben, 75
North Central Avenue, Camp-
bell, Caliform, as Ise nine and
pace for puhn: hearing to
consider the application of
Mark S. Madden, D V.M„ for
a use permit and appr" of
darn to cenven a revdence
into a velennary hospital on
pr.pany known as 2175 S.
Bascom Avenue in a C-2-S
(General Cornrtx A) Iorwnq
District A P N 413 m4120.
Map and legal dew ption
of subWf property M fib in
Ow office of the Plln irp
Datianment 25 Nwth Central
Avenue, Canpbem, California.
Inlereslrld persons male
appear and be h-cd al lead
hearing.
CITY OF CAMPBELL
PLANNING COMMISSION
's' Amur A. nee
Secrent,
Pub3 23-77 lot CP
1
1.. 7
CITY OF CAMPDE:.I, PLANNING COMMISSION
CASE SHEET
NAME Mark S. Madden D.V.M.
ADDRESS 4629 Mia Circle
San Jose, CA
APPLICATION FOR UP 77-6 DATE FILED March 14, 1977
AMOUNT OF FEE $50.,j0 DATE PAID March 14, 1977
PROPERTY ADDRESS 2175 S. Bascom Avenue
Campbell, CA
DATE PUBLISHED IN CAMPBELL PRESS
DATE PROPERTY WAS PCSTED
DATE LETTER SENT TO APPLICANT
DATE OF FIRST PUDLIC HEARING
CONTINUED TO:
APPROVED _
DENIED
March 23, 1977 i
April 5, 1977
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION NO.
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY CITY COUNCI..
FINAL ACTION: APPROVED
DENIED
w
CITY Or CAMPBELL, CAL2rO1:NIA
PLANNING DEPARTIIrNT
ArrIDP.VIT Or POSTING
State of California )
) ss
County of Santa Clara)
Is /.. ce teo of said County being duly
sworn deposes and says: That I am and at all times hereafter
mentioned was a citizen of the United States; over the age
of twenty-one (21) years; and that on the Z44-day of
_ , 197-�_, 1 duly posteU en exact and
true co ,y of:
Notice of public hearing to consider the application of
Mark S. Madden, D.V.M., for a use permit and approval of
plans to convert a residence into a veterinary hospital
on property known as 2175 S. Bascom Avenue in a C-2-S
Zoning District.
Signaure
Attested to and sworn to before me this
day of _-��[G/ _ , 197Z2.
C,r*J-y--f-}erlr Deputy Ci Clerk
City of Campbell, California
(I
4L '
///��//��f/y�p�EEEEhh��
4/w e
4;;P k-k
I:IR - _ pile
--
DECLARATION THAT AN hNJIRONIIENTAL
IMPACT IMPORT IS Nll•1' REQGIRED
(NEGAT1%T DFCLA1tA1lON)
APPLICANT N" S. NADDEN, D.Y.M.
ADDRESS 46Y9 NIA CIRCLE
SAN JOSS, CA 96136
PKOJGCT :;A Ili: CORM A RESIDENCE IMIO A VETERINARY NOWITAL IN A C-%S
MNINf DISTRICT.
AliDIMSS
Tamp el lI,--Ca iforrnia - - —
Pursuant to the applicable sections of the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and Citv of Campbell Resolution No. 3766
and --- -- --
After review of plans an,[ information supplied by the applicant per-
taining to the captioned project, the undersigned does hereby
determine that the captioned project will have no sit
nificant effect
(no substantial adverse impact) on the en,,ironment within the terms
and meaning of said Act and kesolution.
lite reasons tur making this declaration are as follows:
There are no reported endangered species of plants or animals on
the site.
The surrounding area is nearly completely ,leveloped.
This project will not release any harmful elements into the
atmosphere.
EAecuted at Camphcll, California, this 1ft2d;n of ���-- 1971 _
LItTI!UR 4. F,1'1' Director or
-- — - - - - — Official
r:lchtr? '.•lin, ia„r lit I I inner i
USE PERMIT
CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
up A 77-
APPLICANT
NAME: I`-AODEni 1/N DATE: /y �'IAi:-C/i /977
Please type or print .
ADDRESS: 411.29 1-I&I 01&0 L: id.1 _JOSF_ TELEPHONE: _j'JfJ
PROPERTY ADDRESS „71 7ET Ave
Applicant 14UST attach legal. description of property
IMPROVEMENTS:
Existing
Proposed Qe��cJ� z� c.� ve.�i- , >
USE APPLIED
FOR: (Applicant 11UST citesection number of Campbell Municipal
Code which authorizes Planning Commission to grant the
particular use applied for;
,.?/. �c t/. <9&0 --
APPLICATICM:
I/We, the unders_p.ne:d person(s) having an interest in the above
describes n property, erehy make application for a Use Permit of the
nature set forth above, in accordance with the provisions of thu Camplell
Municipal Cc:ie of the City of Campbell, California, a::d I/He hereby
certify that the information given herein is true and correct to the
bes fZ
1 ,, and belief.
l` li
Respectfully submitto.d,
Filed ii 44,PAN.
Planning Department
on CITY OF CA_PAPJEhdO! Signature
fiLANWN:3 DEPARTWtAT
By: YEA ctt�tCCz �.+�
Address
MARK —> MAoor-- AJ.
iriaase pr nt app ica t s name �y r/,*�e / .�'7
Uate
I
INFORMATION FOR PERSONS
Ml.KING APPLICATION FOR A USE
Pl?IUdIT
Use Permit application should he completely filled out and filed
in the office of the Planning Department, 75 North Central Avenue,
Campbell. California, on forms obtained from said office. The
Campbell Planning Commission meets on the first and third Thursday
of each month at the City flail. A public hearing is required on
each application. '110 Planning Commission Secretary is requited
to give public notice of said hearing not less than ten days
prior to the date of the meeting at which the hearing is held. i
In addition to the application form properly completed, additional
information should be furnished by applicants covering the follow
ing points:
1. Justification: A clear and detailed statement in writing
su6staniiating the request for a Use Permit.
2. I.ia or diagram showing the boundaries of the area for
wi�ich �a Ilse Permit is requested al0 of the property
surrounding the same for a distance of five hundred feet.
3. Other data, such as letters,petiti.ons, drawings or
P otograp6s which the applicant wishes to relate to
his application.
4. A fee of $5o.00. flake check payable to the City of Campbell.
Attention of applicants is especially called to the importance
of being present at public hearins. The burden of presenting
the matter to the Planning; Commission and to the City Council
is on the applicant, and failure to he present at a hearing may
adversely affect the applicant's chances of obtaining the Ilse
Permit lie requests.
FORM EIR-1
CkITF.RIA FOR
PROJECT;, WHICIi MAY ..r- A
SIGNIFICANT ENVIPO:-'ML::.P.:. :y.PACT
Answer the following questions by placin.; a check in
the
appropriate space.
Yes 1:0
1.
Could the project significantly change present
uses of the project area?
_ _ _x_
2.
Could the project significantly char.:.e present
uses of land outside the project area?
3.
Could the project affect the use of a recre-
ational area or area of important aesthetic
value?
_X_
4.
Could the project substantially affect the
functioning of -an established cor.,-:uncty?
x -
•5.
Could the project result in the displacement of
community residents?
x_
0.
Are any of the natural or nan-rade features in
the project area unique, that is, rfot found in
other parts of the county?
_x_
7.
Could the project significantly affect a known
historical or or•chaelogical site or its setting?
B,
Could the project s3gnf3cnntly afreet the po-
tential use, extraction, or conservation of a
natural resource?
S.
hoes the project area :serve as a T.al-itat, food
source, nesting place, source of wait,!,, etc, for
rare or endangered wildlife or fish species?
10.
buld ilia project sign3ficantly affect fish,
wildlife, or plant life?
11.
Are there nny rare or endangered. plant species
In the project area?
12.
Could the project result iu tLe- erosion of r,
outsidc• property? r
II 11, -
jrvit—
19977
-lo- CITY Or CAC6P6ELL
I LANNINn OFPA.4TMENT
I
�
Yen 'Jn
13.
Will the project require a variance from estab-
&_
lished environmental standards (air, stater,
noise, ctc), and/or adopted plans? '
14.
Will the project require certification, author-
ization or issuance of a permit by any local,
state, or federal cnvironne.ntal control agency?
'
If so, please indicate name of the agency
IS.
Will the project involve the application, use
or disposal of hazardous materials?
_ X_
16.
Will the project involve construction of
facilities in a flood plain?
x_
17.
Will the project involve construction of
facilities in the area of a known active
fault?
18.
Could the completed project result in the
•
generation of significant amounts of noise?
_ _ x_
19.
Could the construction of the project- result
Ill the generation of significant amounts of
dust?
20.
Could the completed project result in ti,e
generation of significant amounts of dust?
_ x _
21.
Could the project result in a s3gnific.�nt�chanl;e
In the quality of any portion of the region's
air or wt.tcr resources? (Should note surface,
ground water, offshore.)
x_
1 n. 1°77
CITY OF
PLA:.NINU GF. p.,gTNENT
-11- '
5tatem(•nt of Flo •;;-Ificaut I:nvi.runmental 1'.ff�'_
If ,ou Lave answered yes to ouc or nore of the questions in
Section II, but still thin): that t1Fc project will Lave no
significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below.
�:,.r.s �-/�/Y,C<.r-l_AVF l', i-.•�u �,,-�JI l✓llrj
Address of project !
/977
Date submitted
>aaK I9ROOE , DVN
Applicants name
�ppl cants signature
II
I I
I
U U 1 197. 7 D
i
CITY o-
f'Ll.I.':':'•� OEF�.'7TM ENT
I '
II
1
i1.
DESCRIPTION
ORDER NO. 51883
BEGINNING at a point on the Westerly line of Johnson Avenue, distant
thereon. 60 feet Northerly from the point of intersection of the
Westerly line of Johnson Avenue with the Northerly line of Apricot
vsnue; thence running Northerly along the Westerly line of Johnson
re,.ue 73 feet; thence Westerly and parallel with the Northerly
line of Apricot Avenue, 198.72 feet; thence Southerly and parallel
with the Westerly line of Johnson Avenue 73 feet; thence Easterly
and parallel with the Northerly line of Apricot Avenue 198.72 feet
to the point of beginning, and being the Easterly 198.72 feet of
Lot 3 as shorn upon that certain Map entitles, "MAP OF ORCHARD VILLA
TRACT IN SEC. 35 T. 7 S.R.1.W.M.D.M.", which was filed for record
in the office of the County.Recorder of the Coi:nty of Santa Clara,
State of California, on July 14, 1924 in Volume "S" of Maps, page
23.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion described as follows:
COMMENCING at the point of intersection of the Easterly Prolonga-
tion of the most Southerly line of that certain parcel of land
described in the deed from George M. Whitfield and Yvonne Whitfield,
husband and wife, to A. A. Arends and Mamie V. Arends, husband and
wife, as joint tenants recorded June 1, 1944 in Book 1205 of Official
Records, Office of the Recorder, County of Santa Clara, Stat= of
California at page 107 with that certain monument line estatlished
for record on that particular map entitled, "RECORD OF SURVEY 01'
A MONUMENT LINF. OF SOUTH BASCOM AVETfUE, FROM UNION AVENUE TO WEST
SAN CARLOS STREET" filed for r.,cord January 22, 1)59, in Book 247
of Maps of Official Records, Office of the Recorder, County of Sar.^a
Clara, State of California, at page 40; thence from said point of
commencement Westerly along said prolongation to the Southeasterli
corner. of said property being in the Westerly line of D.,sccm Avenue
and also being the true point of beginning of this description;
thence continuing Westerly along said Southerly lire of said pre_ rty
to the point of intersection thereof with a li • parallel with -nd
47.00 feet distant Westerly measured at right ".ales frr-m said monu-
ment line; thence Northerly along said parallel line to the point,
of intersection thereof with the most Northerly line of said uar-el
of land; thence Easterly along said Northerly line to the point
of intersection thereof with said Westerly line of Bascom Avenue,
also being the Northeasterly corner of said property; thence Southerly
along the Westerly line of Bascom Avenue to the true point of ),eginninq
of this description, containing approxii^ately 1,241.00 Square feet.
10-26-76-SJ1-02-L
413-44-120
10-062
JM/AP : cg ? 14 1977
(A)413-44-48 (F) 413-44-48
(N/I) CITY- OF CANIFIDELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
10
Q I K
'i-G)
CAMV'i'FLI P M. AVL
4 3,',G M kO PKI
98 P(t A
16
10
1 0$7 AC rl— I c 141�CL
P7
DR
to S2
c
4 V
AL T-
4"-
L '4 I�PCL I IOS
------- A
FCL 3
KL A
32v Ac NET.
la I.M7AC NET i.
it I�Q 72
!E3
'54
JY
2): 4-
1,A ICHAE L DR
24 2-1 24 29 33 31
00
A
1-1
10
40
i 11