2018-06-05 (City Council Staff Report)
City
Council
Report
TITLE: Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Ordinance Update – Request for City
Council Direction on the Minimum Lot Size
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council provide direction on the minimum lot size requirement to be
incorporated in a revised Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance.
BACKGROUND
A second round of legislation signed into law last year by Governor Brown, codified in
California Government Code Section 65852.2, clarified and further eased requirements
for construction of accessory dwelling units (ADU). Last October, the City Council also
considered an appeal pertaining to the conversion of a garage to an accessory dwelling
unit that revealed the need for improved clarity. Staff was, therefore, directed to prepare
a Zoning Code Amendment to make the necessary updates and corrections.
A draft ordinance update was presented to the Planning Commission on February 13,
2018 (reference Attachments 1 and 2 – Planning Commission Staff Report and draft
ordinance). Many residents offered testimony regarding the need to reduce the
minimum lot size. Some felt it should be reduced to 8,000 square-feet while others felt it
should be reduced even lower. The Commission asked staff to research the ADU
policies of other Santa Clara County cities so they could understand how neighboring
communities addressed this issue. They also asked staff to provide options and
analysis for reducing the minimum lot area, allowing ADUs in second-stories, and
possible incentives.
However, the Council requested that this matter be agenized for a public discussion so
that specific direction could be provided to the Planning Commission on the minimum lot
size requirement. As such, this report provides background information and options for
Council consideration.
Minimum Lot Size: The Zoning Code currently specifies a 10,000 square-foot minimum
lot size for construction of all ADUs. To preserve a relationship between the size of a
parcel and the size of the ADU, the Zoning Code also ties the allowable size of an ADU
to the lot size, as shown in the table below:
Minimum Net Lot Area Maximum Floorspace or Living Area*
Item: 17
Category: NEW BUSINESS
Meeting Date: June 5, 2018
17
Packet Pg. 262
ADU Update Page 2 of 6
10,000-10,999 sq. ft. 700 sq. ft.
11,000-11,999 sq. ft. 800 sq. ft.
12,000-12,999 sq. ft. 900 sq. ft.
13,000-13,999 sq. ft. 1,000 sq. ft.
14,000-14,999 sq. ft. 1,100 sq. ft.
15,000 sq. ft. or greater 1,200 sq. ft.
*The living area for an attached/interior accessory dwelling unit cannot
exceed 50% of the primary dwelling unit's living area.
In comparison to several nearby cities, Campbell's 10,000 square-foot minimum lot size
is a high threshold. Other cities have either eliminated the minimum lot size requirement
altogether or have reduced it down to the minimum lot size of their residential zoning
districts. However, comparisons to other cities often lack context since ADU
requirements are only one component of a City's overall housing policy. For instance,
although San Jose may have a low minimum lot area, that City also allows housing
development at over triple Campbell's maximum density for projects very near the City
border.
Minimum Lot Size
Campbell San Jose Sunnyvale Cupertino Mountain
View Palo Alto Los Gatos
10,000 SF 5,455 SF
6,000 SF
(for new structures)
No Minimum
(in existing structures)
No
Minimum
No
Minimum 5,000 SF No
Minimum
Housing Element: The current 10,000 square-foot minimum lot size is not required by
the General Plan Housing Element. Program H-5.3a, below, only directs the City to
encourage production of "secondary units" by furnishing information to the public. In
comparison, the previous Housing Element required the City to reduce the minimum lot
size from 12,000 square-feet to 10,000 square-feet, which was accomplished in 2004.
The Council last discussed the minimum lot size at an August 19, 2014 Study Session
on the Housing Element Update. The Council reviewed a version of Program H-5.3a
that would have required the City to consider reducing the minimum lot size to 8,000
square-feet. However, the Council directed that language removed and replaced with
the text that was adopted. The Housing Element, therefore, is silent on whether the
minimum lot size should be maintained or reduced.
Program H-5.3a: Secondary Dwelling Units: Provide for the infill of modestly priced
rental housing by encouraging secondary units in residential
neighborhoods.
17
Packet Pg. 263
ADU Update Page 3 of 6
Program H-5.3a: Secondary Dwelling Units: A secondary dwelling unit
is a separate dwelling unit that provides complete,
independent living facilities for one or more persons. It
includes permanent provisions for living, sleeping,
cooking, eating, and sanitation on the same parcel as
the primary unit is situated. Given the limited
developable land remaining in Campbell, integrating
secondary dwelling units in existing residential
neighborhoods presents an opportunity for the City to
accommodate needed rental housing. The
development of secondary dwelling units is effective
in dispersing affordable housing throughout the City
and can provide housing to lower-income persons,
including seniors and college students. Approximately
1,000 single-family parcels in Campbell are of
sufficient size to add a secondary dwelling unit.
Implementation Objective: The City will facilitate the
construction of new secondary dwelling units by
making information available to the public.
The Housing Element does not rely on production of ADUs to satisfy the City's non-
market-rate Regional Housing Need Allocation (RHNA) obligation. Although Program H-
5.3a discusses ADUs as providing housing to lower-income persons, ADUs are not
deed-restricted to be affordable. Under current HCD income limits, affordable rent for a
three-person low-income household (2-bedroom apartment) is $1,333 per month
(including utilities). In comparison, asking rents for ADUs in Campbell range from
$2,000 to $2,500 per month (typically excluding utilities)1. While ADUs may be lower in
cost than the City-wide average rent of $2,450, they therefore, cannot be considered to
be "affordable" or below-market-rate housing.
SB-831: The California Legislature is currently considering a third round of ADU
legislation, Senate Bill (SB) 831. If passed and signed by the Governor, the bill in its
current form would make the following changes, effectively invaliding significant portions
of the City's ADU ordinance:
Prohibit a minimum lot size requirement;
Exclude ADU square-footage from counting against the allowable floor area ratio
(FAR) or lot coverage;
Require ADUs to be allowed anywhere a residential use is allowed (i.e. every
residential and mixed-use zoning district in the City);
Limit a maximum setback requirement to no greater than 3-feet;
Eliminate the need to replace parking that is removed to create an ADU;
1 Based on current rental listings on Craigslist and Zillow reviewed by staff.
17
Packet Pg. 264
ADU Update Page 4 of 6
Prohibit owner-occupancy requirements and void all existing such agreements;
Prohibit the charging of impact fees (such as park impact fee);
Mandate the City to act on a building permit application within 60 days or the
application is deemed approved;
Establish an amnesty provision for unpermitted ADUs deferring compliance with
any non life-safety code requirements for a period of at least 10 years.
DISCUSSION
Minimum Lot Size: Approximately 25% of the City's single family residential housing
stock is eligible to construct an ADU under the current 10,000 square-foot minimum lot
size, as shown in the table below (also reference Attachment 3 – Lot Size Map). If the
Council wishes to reduce the minimum lot size, it could do so in increments of 1,000
square-feet, depending on the desired outcome. For example, if the Council would like
50% of existing properties to be eligible, a reduction to an 8,000 square-feet minimum
lot size would be sufficient. Alternatively, the Council could maintain a minimum lot size
for new detached ADUs but eliminate it for ADUs created within or attached to an
existing residence or accessory structure (such as Sunnyvale).
R-1 Residential Parcels
Lot Size Range Number of Parcels
≤ 6,999 Square-Feet 2,446
7,000 to 7,999 Square-Feet 841
8,000 to 8,999 Square-Feet 1,017
9,000 to 9,999 Square-Feet 855
10,000 ± Square Feet 1,686
All R-1 Zoned Parcels 6,845
Unit Size: If the Council wishes to reduce or eliminate the minimum lot size,
consideration should also be given of whether the allowable ADU size should still be
tied to the size of the lot. Additional increments could be added, as highlighted below.
Minimum Net Lot Area
Maximum Floorspace or Living
Area*
7,999 sq. ft. or less 400 sq. ft.
8,000-8,990 sq. ft. 500 sq. ft.
9,000-9,999 sq. ft. 600 sq. ft.
10,000-10,999 sq. ft. 700 sq. ft.
11,000-11,999 sq. ft. 800 sq. ft.
12,000-12,999 sq. ft. 900 sq. ft.
13,000-13,999 sq. ft. 1,000 sq. ft.
14,000-14,999 sq. ft. 1,100 sq. ft.
15,000 sq. ft. or greater 1,200 sq. ft.
17
Packet Pg. 265
ADU Update Page 5 of 6
*The living area for an attached/interior accessory dwelling unit
cannot exceed 50% of the primary dwelling unit's living area.
Non-Living Area: In considering maximum ADU size, the Council may also wish to
consider a restriction on garages and storage rooms attached to an ADU. Currently, the
maximum ADU size is a restriction to the allowable living area, meaning that a
homeowner could add a 1,000 square-foot garage/storage building attached to 700
square-foot ADU so long as the project complied with the maximum FAR.
Affordability: As noted above, ADUs on their own do not constitute below-market-rate
housing. Therefore, a reduction or elimination of the minimum lot size will not result in
the production of deed-restricted affordable housing. If this is a policy goal of the
Council, a reduction (or elimination) to the minimum lot size to below 10,000 square-feet
could be tied to a requirement to make the ADU affordable.
The Council could also encourage greater affordability by offering incentives to
homeowners that voluntary deed-restrict an ADU. For example, the City could waive or
reduce building permit fees (ranging from $2,500 to $6,000) and/or the park impact fee
($7,500). As proposed by SB 831, the City could also exempt the ADU square-footage
from the FAR calculation or provide an additional FAR "bonus" (e.g. 5-10%).
Public Comment: Staff received the attached emails on this matter (reference
Attachment 4), with several residents urging a reduction to the 10,000 square-foot
minimum lot size.
Public Outreach: Staff has maintained an ADU interest list of individuals who have
provided emails or requested to be kept informed of pending changes to the ordinance.
An email informing the interest of list this meeting was sent on May 18th. The meeting
date and time was also posted on social media and on the City's website.
SUMMARY
Staff is requesting direction on the following questions:
Minimum Lot Size: Should the minimum lot size be reduced or eliminated?
o If the minimum lot size should be reduced, to what extent?
o If the minimum lot size should be eliminated, should that apply to all
ADUs? Or only ADUs created within or attached to an existing residence
or accessory structure?
Unit Size: If the minimum lot size should be reduced or eliminated, should the
size of the ADU still be tied to the size of the lot?
Non Living Area: Should a restriction on the size of a garage or storage building
attached to an ADU be created?
17
Packet Pg. 266
ADU Update Page 6 of 6
Affordability Requirement: Should a reduction to the 10,000 square-foot
minimum lot size be tied to a requirement to make the ADU affordable?
Affordability Incentives: Should incentive(s) be created to encourage
homeowners to voluntary make an ADU affordable? If so,
o Reduction or elimination of building permit fees?
o Reduction or elimination of the park impact fee?
o Exempt ADU from the 0.45 FAR maximum?
o Provide a FAR "bonus" for ADUs?
Prepared by:
Daniel Fama, Senior Planner
Reviewed by:
Paul Kermoyan, Community
Development Director
Approved by:
Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
1. Attachment 1 - PC Staff Report
2. Attachment 2 - Draft Ordinance
3. Attachment 3 - Lot Size Map
4. Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence
17
Packet Pg. 267
ITEM NO. 1
CITY OF CAMPBELL ∙ PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report ∙ February 13, 2018
PLN2017-375
Zoning Code Amendment
Public Hearing to consider a City-initiated Zoning Code Amendment (PLN2017-375) to amend Titles 18, 20, and 21 of the Campbell Municipal Code pertaining to the construction of accessory dwelling units.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission take the following action:
1. Adopt a Resolution, recommending that the City Council adopt the attached draft ordinance to amend Titles 18, 20, and 21 of the Campbell Municipal Code pertaining to the
construction of accessory dwelling units.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
An amendment to a local municipal code is considered a "project" under Section 15378(a)(1) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. However, the proposed amendment
may be considered exempt from formal environmental review pursuant to Guideline Section
15061(b)(3) in that construction of accessory dwelling units on presently developed properties
within the community has no potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. DISCUSSION
Background: On December 16, 2016 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2216 to
incorporate new Chapter 21.23 (Accessory Dwelling Units) into the City's Zoning Code. This
chapter provided new provisions for construction of accessory dwelling units in compliance with mandatory State legislation signed by the Governor in September of 2016 which eased parking requirements, increased allowable unit sizes, removed fire sprinkler requirements in some cases,
and simplified garage conversions.
Additional legislation signed into law last year, now codified in California Government Code Section 6585.2 (reference Attachment 2), clarifies and further eases requirements for construction of accessory dwelling units. Last October, the City Council also considered an
appeal pertaining to the conversion of a garage to an accessory dwelling unit that revealed the
need for improved clarity. As such, staff was directed to prepare a Zoning Code Amendment to
make the necessary updates and corrections. Proposed Amendments: The attached ordinance (reference Attachment 3) would revise Chapter
21.23 as well as several sections of the Campbell Municipal Code, as summarized below:
1. Definitions. Various definitions would be amended for consistency with State law and to better align with definitions found in the California Government and Vehicle Codes. Additional definitions would be added or amended to provide for greater clarity,
particularly with respect to conversion of accessory structures, as well as for improved
internal consistency with other sections of the Zoning Code.
17.a
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Attachment 1 - PC Staff Report (1185 : ADU Update)
Staff Report ~ Planning Commission Meeting of February 13, 2018 Page 2 of 6
PLN2017-375 ~ Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance
2. Parking Requirements: The following changes reflect changes made in State law as
well as additional changes recommended by staff for greater clarity:
• Provide that parking for an ADU is "one parking space per unit or per bedroom, whichever is less," meaning that a studio ADU (i.e., without a separate bedroom) would not require additional parking and that an ADU with one or two bedrooms
would only require one parking space (unless an exception otherwise applies).
• Allow that parking may be provided within an existing or proposed driveway, such that a new driveway may be created to satisfy the parking requirement.
• Merge the standards for "required" parking (to meet the Code requirement) and
"replacement" parking (to restore lost spaces) so that all uncovered parking spaces
created as part of an ADU project are treated the same in terms of configuration and
placement. New carports and garages would continue to be subject to standard setback requirements.
• Remove the requirement that the primary house must have two compliant parking
spaces (i.e., one covered space and one uncovered space not located within a setback)
in order to be eligible to construct an ADU. Although not strictly required by State law, this requirement is at odds with the ability of homeowners to replace existing spaces "in any configuration."
• Specifically allow tandem parking as required by State law, but limit the number to
no more than three vehicles:
• Specifically allow car lifts as required by State law, but require their installation only
within a garage so that they are not placed outdoors in a manner disruptive to the
residential character of a neighborhood:
17.a
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Attachment 1 - PC Staff Report (1185 : ADU Update)
Staff Report ~ Planning Commission Meeting of February 13, 2018 Page 3 of 6
PLN2017-375 ~ Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance
3. Accessory Structure Conversions: State law allows "existing space" within an
accessory structure (e.g., garages, storage buildings, etc.) or a single-family home to be
converted to an ADU without provision of additional setbacks. To specifically address
this allowance, a new "exception to setbacks" section would be created, which would be tied to new definitions intended to clearly indicate that the use of "existing space" means
to remodel a structure, not to reconstruct it so that it constitutes a new building.
Additionally, to close an apparent loophole that could allow construction of an accessory
structure under less permissive setbacks only for it to be converted later, the setback
exception would only apply to accessory structures constructed prior to January 1, 2017 and which had not been expanded after that date. Similarly, since the setback exception is
intended to allow the functional reuse of an existing building area, an ADU created
though this provision could not be expanded beyond its current size.
4. Allowable Zoning Districts: Currently, an ADU may be only created on a parcel within one of the "R-1" zoning districts. State law now requires the City to allow an ADU in any
zoning district where a single-family home could be constructed. Since the Zoning Code
allows single-family homes in all of multi-family residential zoning districts, ADUs will
also be allowed in the R-D, R-M, R-2, and R-3 zoning districts, as well as the Planned
Development (P-D) zoning district with a residential General Plan land use designation.
Minimum Lot Area: The proposed Zoning Code Amendment does not modify the minimum lot
area or related ADU unit size requirements currently in effect, as shown in the table below:
Minimum Net Lot Area
Maximum Floorspace or Living Area*
10,000-10,999 sq. ft. 700 sq. ft.
11,000-11,999 sq. ft. 800 sq. ft.
12,000-12,999 sq. ft. 900 sq. ft.
13,000-13,999 sq. ft. 1,000 sq. ft.
14,000-14,999 sq. ft. 1,100 sq. ft.
15,000 sq. ft. or greater 1,200 sq. ft.
*The living area for an attached/interior accessory dwelling unit cannot exceed
50% of the primary dwelling unit's living area.
Since State law does not prohibit the establishment of minimum lot areas, such a change is a
policy preference that would generally originate with the City Council. The Council last discussed a reduction to the minimum lot area at an August 19, 2014 Housing Element Study Session. However, as was noted in the January 27, 2015 Planning Commission Housing Element
Staff Report, the Council decided to maintain the existing 10,000 square-foot minimum lot area.
Should the Planning Commission wish to consider a recommendation to the City Council to reduce the minimum lot area, the public hearing would need to be continued to allow for additional staff analysis. However, the Commission should be aware that absent entirely
eliminating the minimum lot area, there will always be property owners who fall below a lot area
threshold. Moreover, comparisons to other cities often lack context since ADU requirements are
only one component of a City's overall housing policy. For instance, although San Jose may have a low minimum lot area, that City also allows housing development at over triple Campbell's maximum density for projects very near the City border.
17.a
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Attachment 1 - PC Staff Report (1185 : ADU Update)
Staff Report ~ Planning Commission Meeting of February 13, 2018 Page 4 of 6
PLN2017-375 ~ Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance
ANALYSIS
Effect of Changes: Consistent with the intent of the State legislation, the Zoning Code
Amendment is likely to further facilitate construction of accessory dwelling units in the
community: 1. Accessory Structure Conversions. The ability of homeowners to convert existing
garages, pool houses, workshops, studios, and similar structures will likely become an
increasingly common approach to creating an ADU due to both the lower cost of
construction and setback exception that previously limited this type of construction. It can also be expected that this effect will be particularly noticeable in the San Tomas Area, and to a lesser extent Campbell Village, by virtue of larger lots and greater
prevalence of accessory structures that were often built in the County's jurisdiction.
However, the ability of some older accessory structures to be converted to ADUs may be
limited by the poor condition of the structures, many of which are decades old. 2. Parking Changes. In combination, the proposed parking changes virtually eliminate the
need to provide parking for an ADU. Even when parking would be required—
construction of a ground-up detached ADU that is not eligible for a parking exception—
such parking may be provided within an existing driveway. Similarly, existing covered parking spaces that may be removed through a garage conversion may also be replaced on a driveway or uncovered parking pad. As a result, creation of an ADU will no longer
require construction of a garage or carport unless a homeowner desires it, further
reducing the cost of construction.
Additionally, eliminating the need to have complaint parking for the main house (i.e., one covered space and one uncovered space not located within a setback) in order to be
eligible to construction an ADU will eliminate an existing barrier for homeowners who
only have a one-car garage.
3. Allowable Zoning Districts. The Zoning Code Amendment will allow ADUs in all of the multi-family residential zoning districts, affecting upwards of 4,000 parcels.
However, the majority of these properties are below the 10,000 square-foot lot minimum
meaning that an ADU could not be constructed. Additionally, since the vast majority of
these properties are fully developed with duplex/trip-plex/four-plex structures or apartment buildings, the ability to create an ADU would likely be limited to an interior conversion (i.e., dividing an existing dwelling unit into two units).
General Plan Conformance: Pursuant to CMC Section 21.60.070, an amendment to the
Municipal Code may only be approved if the decision-making body finds that: (1) the proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, policies, and actions of the General Plan; (2) the
proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience,
or general welfare of the city; and (3) the proposed amendment is internally consistent with other
applicable provisions of the Zoning Code. Staff believes that these findings can be favorably
established, as discussed below:
17.a
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Attachment 1 - PC Staff Report (1185 : ADU Update)
Staff Report ~ Planning Commission Meeting of February 13, 2018 Page 5 of 6
PLN2017-375 ~ Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance
1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, policies, and actions of the General Plan;
The General Plan Housing Element includes Program H-5.3a, below, which directs the City to encourage production of secondary units. The proposed Zoning Code Text Amendment
would further ease regulatory requirements consistent with State law.
Program H-5.3a: Secondary Dwelling Units: Provide for the infill of modestly priced rental housing by
encouraging secondary units in residential neighborhoods.
Program H-5.3a: Secondary Dwelling Units: A secondary dwelling unit is a separate
dwelling unit that provides complete, independent living facilities for one or more persons. It includes permanent provisions for living,
sleeping, cooking, eating, and sanitation on the same parcel as the primary unit is situated. Given the limited developable land remaining
in Campbell, integrating secondary dwelling units in existing residential neighborhoods presents an opportunity for the City to
accommodate needed rental housing. The development of secondary dwelling units is effective in dispersing affordable housing throughout
the City and can provide housing to lower-income persons, including seniors and college students. Approximately 1,000 single-family
parcels in Campbell are of sufficient size to add a secondary dwelling unit.
Implementation Objective: The City will facilitate the construction of new secondary dwelling units by making information available to the
public.
2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or general welfare of the city;
The proposed ordinance would maintain appropriate restrictions on the creation of ADUs
within the community such that the public interest, health, safety, convenience or general welfare will not be harmed.
3. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with other applicable provisions of
this Zoning Code. In addition to revisions to Chapter 21.23 (Accessory Dwelling Ordinance), the proposed
ordinance also revises other existing code section as necessary to ensure internal consistency
within the Zoning Code. PUBLIC COMMENT
Staff received the attached emails on this matter (reference Attachment 4), with several
residents urging a reduction to the 10,000 square-foot minimum lot size.
Attachments: 1. Draft Planning Commission Resolution
2. Government Code Section 65852.2
3. Draft City Council Ordinance
4. Public Correspondence
17.a
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Attachment 1 - PC Staff Report (1185 : ADU Update)
Staff Report ~ Planning Commission Meeting of February 13, 2018 Page 6 of 6
PLN2017-375 ~ Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance
Prepared by:
Daniel Fama, Senior Planner
Approved by:
Paul Kermoyan, Community Development Directo
17.a
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Attachment 1 - PC Staff Report (1185 : ADU Update)
Ordinance No. ____
BEING AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL AMENDING TITLES 18, 20, AND 21 OF THE CAMPBELL MUNICIPAL CODE
PERTAINING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS.
FILE NO. PLN2017-375
After notification and public hearing, as specified by law and after presentation by the Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed.
After due consideration of all evidence presented, the City Council of the City of
Campbell does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. The City Council finds and determines that the adoption of this ordinance, which is intended to modify existing local regulatory requirements to be consistent with
State law, is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to
Guideline Section 15061(b)(3) in that construction of accessory dwelling units on
presently developed properties within the community has no potential to cause a significant effect on the environment.
SECTION 2. The City Council further finds and determines that the proposed ordinance
is consistent with the goals, policies, and actions of the General Plan; including Housing
Element Policies H-5.3 (Secondary Dwelling Units) and H-5.4 (Ordinance Updates).
SECTION 3. The City Council further finds and determines that the proposed ordinance would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or general welfare of the city; and is internally consistent with other applicable provisions of the
Campbell Municipal Code.
SECTION 4. The City Council further finds and determines that adoption of this ordinance
is consistent with the mandatory provisions of Senate Bill 229 (Wieckowski) and Assembly Bill 494 (Bloom), while maintaining locally appropriate standards for the construction and occupancy of accessory dwelling units.
SECTION 5. The City Council further finds and determines that the purpose of permitting
accessory dwelling units is to allow more efficient use of the City's existing housing stock
and to provide the opportunity for the development of small rental housing units designed to meet the special long-term housing needs of individuals and families, while preserving the integrity of single-family neighborhoods.
SECTION 6. Revisions to the Accessory Dwelling Unit Chapter. Chapter 21.23
(Accessory Dwelling Units) of the Campbell Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows with underlining indicating new text and strikeouts (strikeout) indicating deleted text:
17.b
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Draft Ordinance (1185 : ADU Update)
Page 1 of 6
CHAPTER 21.23 (ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS)
21.23.010 - Purpose
This Chapter provides for the establishment of accessory dwelling units in compliance with Article 2 (Zoning Districts). The purpose of permitting accessory dwelling units is to allow more efficient use of the City's existing housing stock and to
provide the opportunity for the development of small rental housing units designed to
meet the special long-term housing needs of individuals and families, while preserving
the integrity of single-family neighborhoods. 21.23.020 - Definitions
In addition to the terms defined by Article 6 (Definitions), the following terms shall
have the following meanings as used in this Chapter: "Accessory structure" means a legally permitted detached structure as defined in
Section 21.72.020.A, including, but not limited to a studio, pool house, garage, or similar
structure.
"Accessory dwelling unit" means a dwelling unit ancillary to a primary dwelling unit which provides complete independent living facilities for one or more persons. It
shall include permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, laundry, and
sanitation on the same parcel as the primary dwelling unit is situated. An accessory
dwelling unit also includes an efficiency unit, as defined in Section 17958.1 of the Health and Safety Code, and a manufactured home, as defined in Section 18007 of the Health and Safety Code. This Chapter recognizes three types of accessory dwelling units as
defined below. Where a proposed accessory dwelling unit does not clearly fall into one
of the types defined below, the Community Development Director shall make a
determination as to the type of accessory dwelling unit the proposed unit shall be treated pursuant to Section 21.02.030 (Procedures for interpretations).
1. "Attached accessory dwelling unit" means an accessory dwelling unit that
is constructed as a physical expansion (i.e., addition) of an existing
primary dwelling unit, including and also includes an existing garage attached to a primary dwelling unit that is legally converted (fully or partially) to an accessory dwelling unit and construction of a new
basement underneath a primary dwelling unit to accommodate an
accessory dwelling unit.
2. "Detached accessory dwelling unit" means an accessory dwelling unit that is (1) constructed as a separate structure from the primary dwelling unit; or
(2) contained within the existing space of an accessory structure (as
defined herein)., and also includes an existing garage detached from the
primary dwelling unit that is legally converted (fully or partially) to an accessory dwelling unit.
17.b
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Draft Ordinance (1185 : ADU Update)
Page 2 of 14
3. "Interior accessory dwelling unit" means an accessory dwelling unit that is legally created entirely (1) contained within the existing living area space
of a primary dwelling unit, including within an existing its living area,
basement, or attached garage; or (2) constructed as part of a proposed
primary dwelling unit. "Car share vehicle" means a motor vehicle as defined by Vehicle Code Section
22507.1(d).
"Complete building permit application" means an application for a building permit, comprising all required drawings, details, and calculations, including those necessary to determine the appropriate scope of work pursuant to Chapter 18.32 (Determination of
scope of work), which that has been cleared for issuance by all reviewing departments
and which the Building Official has determined may be issued to an appropriate
individual upon payment of the necessary fees. "Contained within the existing space" means conversion of a structure's existing
floor area to create an accessory dwelling unit.
"Conversion" or "convert(ed)" means to remodel a legally constructed structure in a manner that would not constitute a "new dwelling using portions of the original structure" pursuant to Chapter 18.32 (Determination of scope of work).
"Existing garage" means a legally constructed attached or detached garage that
is in existence and/or granted a certificate of occupancy prior to January 1, 2017. "Existing living area" means the legally constructed living area of a primary
dwelling unit that is in existence and/or granted a certificate of occupancy prior to
January 1, 2017.
"Driveway" means a paved access way as defined in Section 21.72.020.D, including a paved area reserved or created for the purpose of satisfying a parking
requirement of this Chapter.
"Existing space of an accessory structure" means the gross floor area of an accessory structure that was granted a certificate of occupancy prior to January 1, 2017 and which has not been expanded on or after January 1, 2017.
"Living area" means the interior habitable floor area of a dwelling unit, including
conditioned basements and attics, but not garages or other accessory structures, as measured to the outside surface of exterior walls.
"Floorspace" means the gross floor area of a detached accessory dwelling unit
as measured to the outside surface of exterior walls, including its living area and
basement area whether conditioned or unconditioned.
17.b
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Draft Ordinance (1185 : ADU Update)
Page 3 of 14
"Passageway" means a pathway that is unobstructed to the sky and extends from a street to the entrance of an accessory dwelling unit.
"Public transit" means the same as "transit station" as defined by Government
Code Section 65460.1(b)(5).means one of the existing light rail passenger terminals located within the City of Campbell (i.e., Hamilton Station, Downtown Campbell Station, and Winchester Station).
"Setback" means the required separation as defined in Section 21.72.020.S,
including the required "distance between non-accessory structures on the same lot" as specified by the general development standards table for each residential zoning district.
"Story" means the portion of a building as defined in Section 21.72.020.S,
including a "half-story," a mezzanine, or a loft. "Tandem parking" means a parking configuration where two or more automobiles
are parked on a driveway or in any other location on a lot, lined up behind one another.
21.23.030 - Minimum Standards for Eligibility An A single accessory dwelling unit may only be constructed on parcels satisfying all
of the following minimum standards:
A. Zoning district. A parcel located within a residential zoning district as specified by Chapter 21.08 (Residential zoning districts) or in the P-D (Planned Development) Zoning District on a parcel with a General Plan land use designation that directly
corresponds to a residential zoning district as specified by Section 21.04.020,
Table 2-1. an R-1 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District.
B. Existing primary dDwelling unit. A parcel that is presently developed with one primary dwelling unit or that will be developed with a primary dwelling unit in
conjunction with the creation of an accessory dwelling unit. An accessory
dwelling unit may not be constructed on a parcel without a primary dwelling unit
or which is developed with more than one primary dwelling unit or that is already developed with an accessory dwelling unit.
C. Minimum lot size. A parcel with a net lot area of 10,000 square feet or greater,
inclusive of any public or private easements except for easements that establish
a private street, subject to the living area or floorspace limitations specified by Table 3-1(a). The community development director may require preparation of a survey to verify the parcel size.
Table 3-1(a) – Minimum Lot Size by Living Area or Floorspace
Minimum Net Lot Area
Maximum Floorspace or Living Area
10,000-10,999 sq. ft. 700 sq. ft.
17.b
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Draft Ordinance (1185 : ADU Update)
Page 4 of 14
11,000-11,999 sq. ft. 800 sq. ft.
12,000-12,999 sq. ft. 900 sq. ft.
13,000-13,999 sq. ft. 1,000 sq. ft.
14,000-14,999 sq. ft. 1,100 sq. ft.
15,000 sq. ft. or greater 1,200 sq. ft.
D. Compliant parking. A parcel that is presently developed with the minimum
number of parking spaces required for a primary dwelling unit (1 covered and 1
uncovered) or which will be developed with the required number parking spaces
in conjunction with the creation of an accessory dwelling unit. 21.23.040 - Development Standards
An accessory dwelling unit may shall only be constructed only in accordance with
the following development standards: A. General requirements. Except as otherwise specified by this Chapter, all
accessory dwelling units shall satisfy the requirements applicable to a primary
dwelling unit, including required yards, building height, distance between
structuresbuildings, setbacks, floor area ratio, and lot coverage standards, as specified by the zoning district and/or area or neighborhood plan in which the parcel is located, as well as all applicable general performance, site
development, landscaping, flood protection, and parking standards, (including
those specified by subsection H, (Parking Section 21.23.040.H). The
requirements for accessory structures found in Section 21.36.020 (Accessory structures) do not apply to accessory dwelling units.
B. Exception to setbacks. An accessory dwelling unit that would otherwise not
conform to the applicable setback requirements of this Title may be created if
one of the following conditions applies, provided that the side and rear setbacks are sufficient for fire safety:
1. An interior dwelling accessory unit contained within the existing space of a
primary dwelling unit; or
2. A detached dwelling accessory unit contained within the existing space of an accessory structure.
A detached accessory dwelling unit created through this exception shall
not be expanded in any manner, including expansion of the living area or attachment of a garage or other uninhabitable space, and shall not be permitted to exercise the setback exception for non-conforming structures
provided for in Section 21.58.050.F (Exceptions).
B. Existing garages. An existing garage that is fully (not partially) converted to an accessory dwelling unit is subject to all provisions of this Chapter except that no additional setback from property lines or to other existing structuresshall be
17.b
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Draft Ordinance (1185 : ADU Update)
Page 5 of 14
required, provided that the existing garage is not expanded. Any expansion of the structure shall comply with applicable setback requirements and shall not be
permitted to exercise the setback exception for non-conforming structures
provided for in Section 21.58.050.F (Exceptions).
C. Maximum size. The maximum floorspace for a detached accessory dwelling unit
and the maximum living area for an attached or interior accessory dwelling unit
shall be as specified in Section 21.21.030.C, Table 3-1(a), except that in no case
shall the living area for an attached or interior accessory dwelling unit exceed fifty
percent of the existing or proposed living area of the primary dwelling unit.
D. Maximum height and stories. A detached accessory dwelling unit shall be a
maximum of fourteen feet in height, except for a detached dwelling accessory
unit contained within the existing space of an accessory structure which shall
maintain the existing height of the accessory structure, and shall not exceed one story. An attached or interior accessory dwelling unit shall be limited to the
ground floor or the basement of the primary dwelling unit.
E. Allowable rooms. Accessory dwelling units shall include no more than two
bedrooms and two bathrooms. In no case shall an accessory dwelling unit include more than one kitchen.
F. Design. A detached accessory dwelling unit shall be constructed to incorporate
the same or similar building materials and colors as the primary dwelling unit,
except for manufactured homes which shall be required to incorporate only the same or similar building colors as the primary dwelling unit. Attached or and
interior accessory dwelling units shall maintain the appearance of the primary
dwelling unit as that of a single-family dwelling. Garages that are converted to
accessory dwelling units shall include removal of garage doors which shall be
replaced with architectural features, including walls, doors, windows, trim and accent details that remove any appearance that the structure was originally a
garage. Existing driveways that lead to converted garages shall be removed and
associated curb-cuts restored to standard sidewalk, unless necessary to satisfy
the required or replacement parking requirement specified by subsection H,
(Parking).
G. Entrances. An accessory dwelling unit shall include separate independent
exterior access from the primary dwelling unit and may include an interior
connection. However, the front door of an accessory dwelling unit shall not be
oriented towards a public street. A passageway from the accessory dwelling unit to a public street may be created, but shall not be required by the City.
H. Parking. Off-street parking for accessory dwelling units and replacement off-
street parking for primary dwelling units shall satisfy the standards and
regulations set forth by Chapter 21.28 (Parking and loading), except as otherwise specified below:, in addition to those parking spaces required for the primary
17.b
Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Draft Ordinance (1185 : ADU Update)
Page 6 of 14
dwelling unit (1 covered space and 1 uncovered space), shall be provided in compliance with the following provisions.
1. Number of parking spaces required.Required parking. No parking shall be
required for interior and attached accessory dwelling units or for detached accessory dwelling units contained within the existing space of an accessory structure. All other detached accessory dwelling units shall be
provided with one parking space per unit or bedroom, whichever is less,
except in the following instances:
a. No parking spaces shall be required for a detached accessory
dwelling unit located on a parcel within a traversable distance of
one-half mile of public transit; No additional parking shall be
required for interior accessory dwelling units.
b. No parking spaces shall be required for a detached accessory
dwelling unit located on a parcel within a designated historic district;
Attached and detached accessory dwelling units shall provide one parking space (covered or uncovered) per bedroom provided that
any existing parking spaces that are removed by conversion of an
existing garage shall be replaced concurrently with creation of the
accessory dwelling unit.
c. No parking spaces shall be required for a detached accessory
dwelling unit located within the boundaries of a permanent
residential parking permit program, and where the City does not
offer parking permits to the occupant(s) of the accessory dwelling
unit; and
d. No parking spaces shall be required for a detached accessory
dwelling unit located on a parcel within one block of a City-licensed
car share vehicle.
2. Replacement parking. Existing parking spaces required for the primary
dwelling unit that are removed as part of the creation of the accessory
dwelling unit (e.g., by demolition or conversion of a garage) shall be
replaced concurrently with creation of the accessory dwelling unit.
3. Parking configuration. Required and replacement parking spaces may be
created in any configuration on the parcel, including, but not limited to, as
covered spaces, uncovered spaces, or tandem spaces, or by the use of
mechanical automobile parking lifts, subject to the following standards:
a. Covered parking spaces provided within a new garage or carport
shall satisfy all applicable setback, height, placement, and
dimension standards.
17.b
Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Draft Ordinance (1185 : ADU Update)
Page 7 of 14
b. Uncovered parking spaces may encroach into a required front yard or street-side yard setback within an existing or proposed driveway
that satisfies both the surfacing and minimum stall dimensions for a
parking space(s), unless such a configuration is determined not to
be feasible based upon fire and/or life safety conditions present on the property. Such a determination may be appealed as an interpretation of this Title in compliance with Section 21.02.030
(Procedures for interpretations).
c. Tandem parking shall be limited to three parking spaces. d. Mechanical automobile parking lifts shall only be installed within a
fully enclosed garage.
2. Parking configuration. Required and replacement covered parking spaces created by construction of a carport or garage and replacement uncovered spaces shall comply with all applicable development standards.
Uncovered parking spaces required for an accessory dwelling unit may
encroach into a required front-yard or street-side yard setback within an
existing driveway that satisfies the minimum stall dimensions for a residential parking space, unless such a configuration is determined not to be feasible based upon fire and/or life safety conditions present on the
property. Such a determination may be appealed as an interpretation of
this Code in compliance with Section 21.02.030 (Procedures for
interpretations). 3. Demolition of an existing garage. When an existing garage (or carport) is
demolished in conjunction with the construction of an accessory dwelling
unit, any required parking spaces contained within the garage (or carport)
shall be replaced concurrently with creation of the accessory dwelling unit. The replacement spaces shall comply with all applicable development standards except that the replacement spaces may be located in any
configuration on the parcel, including, but not limited to, as covered
spaces, uncovered spaces, or tandem spaces, or by the use of
mechanical automobile parking lifts. 4. Exception to parking requirement. The parking requirement for an
attached and detached accessory dwelling unit shall not apply in the
following instances, which shall allow creation of an attached or detached
accessory dwelling unit without provision of additional parking. a. The accessory dwelling unit is located on a parcel within a
traversable distance of one-half mile of public transit.
b. The accessory dwelling unit is located on a parcel within a designated historic district.
17.b
Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Draft Ordinance (1185 : ADU Update)
Page 8 of 14
c. The accessory dwelling unit is located within the boundaries of a permanent residential parking permit program, and where the City
does not offer parking permits to the occupant(s) of the accessory
dwelling unit.
d. The accessory dwelling unit is located on a parcel within one block of a City-licensed car-share vehicle (as defined by the California Vehicle
Code).
21.23.050 – General Requirements and Restrictions The following requirements and restrictions apply to all existing and new accessory
dwelling units:
A. Rentals. No more than one dwelling unit on the parcel, either the accessory dwelling unit or the primary dwelling unit, shall be leased or otherwise rented. Leases for durations of less than thirty (30) days, including short-term rentals (as
defined by the California Government Code) are prohibited. The community
development director shall require recordation of a deed restriction documenting
these restrictions. B. Subdivision and sales. No subdivision of land or air rights shall be allowed,
including creation of a stock cooperative or similar common interest ownership
arrangement. In no instance shall an accessory dwelling unit be sold or otherwise
conveyed separate from the primary dwelling unit. C. Park impact fee. A fee in-lieu of parkland dedication land shall be paid in
compliance with Chapter 13.08 (Park Impact Fees).
D. Building code. Accessory dwelling units shall comply with all applicable Building and Fire Codes as appropriate, except that the Building Official shall not require installation of fire sprinklers for an interior accessory dwelling unit if they would
otherwise not be required for the primary dwelling unit, except if the creation of
the an interior or attached accessory dwelling unit would result in the primary
dwelling unit becoming creation of a "new dwelling using portions of the original structure" pursuant to Chapter 18.32 (Determination of scope of work).
E. Utilities. The Building Official shall coordinate with local utility agencies to ensure
that accessory dwelling units are not considered new residential uses for the
purpose of calculating local agency connection fees or capacity charges for utilities, including water and sewer services.
21.23.060 – Approval Process
The City shall issue a building permit for an accessory dwelling unit that is consistent with the provisions of this Chapter, as determined by issuance of a Zoning Clearance, within one hundred and twenty (120) days of submittal of a complete
17.b
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Draft Ordinance (1185 : ADU Update)
Page 9 of 14
building permit application. However, physical expansion (i.e., addition) or exterior alteration to an existing primary dwelling unit or construction of a new primary dwelling
unit located on a parcel that is subject to design review pursuant to Chapter 21.42 (Site
and architectural review), or Chapter 21.33 (Historic preservation), or Chapter
21.12.030 (P-D (Planned development) zoning district) shall first receive approval of the appropriate land use permit prior to a submittal of a building permit application for an accessory dwelling unit.
SECTION 7. R-D Zoning District Permitted Uses: Campbell Municipal Code Section
21.08.040.B (Permitted uses in R-D (Two-family) zoning district) is amended to read as follows with underlining indicating new text and strikeouts (strikeout) indicating deleted text:
B. Permitted uses in R-D (Two-family) zoning district. The following uses are permitted
with a zoning clearance in compliance with Chapter 21.40, (Zoning Clearances):
1. Accessory structures;
2. Accessory dwelling units;
2.3. Duplexes;
3.4. Family child day care homes, small;
4.5. Garage/yard sales, private;
5.6. Groundwater recharge facilities;
6.7. Hobby car restoration;
7.8. Home occupations;
8.9. Parks, public;
9.10. Residential care homes, small;
10.11. Residential service facilities, small;
11.12. Satellite television or personal internet broadband dishes/antenna (less than
three feet in diameter);
12.13. Schools - K-12, public;
13.14. Single-family dwellings;
14.15. Supportive housing;
15.16. Transitional housing.
SECTION 8. R-M Zoning District Permitted Uses: Campbell Municipal Code Section
21.08.050.B (Permitted uses in R-M (Multiple-family) zoning district) is amended to read as follows with underlining indicating new text and strikeouts (strikeout) indicating deleted text:
17.b
Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Draft Ordinance (1185 : ADU Update)
Page 10 of 14
B. Permitted uses in R-M (Multiple-family) zoning district. The following uses are permitted with a zoning clearance in compliance with Chapter 21.40, (Zoning
Clearances):
1. Accessory structures;
2. Accessory dwelling units;
2.3. Apartments;
3.4. Duplexes;
4.5. Family child day care homes, small;
5.6. Garage/yard sales, private;
6.7. Groundwater recharge facilities;
7.8. Home occupations;
8.9. Parks, public;
9.10. Residential care homes, small;
10.11. Residential service facilities, small;
11.12. Satellite television or personal internet broadband dishes/antenna (less than three feet in diameter);
12.13. Schools - K-12, public;
13.14. Single-family dwellings;
14.15. Supportive housing;
15.16. Transitional housing.
SECTION 9. R-2 Zoning District Permitted Uses: Campbell Municipal Code Section
21.08.060.B (Permitted uses in R-2 (Multiple-family) zoning district) is amended to read
as follows with underlining indicating new text and strikeouts (strikeout) indicating
deleted text:
1. Accessory structures;
2. Accessory dwelling units;
2.3. Apartments;
3.4. Duplexes;
4.5. Family child day care homes, small;
5.6. Garage/yard sales, private;
6.7. Groundwater recharge facilities;
7.8. Home occupations;
8.9. Parks, public;
9.10. Residential care homes, small;
17.b
Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Draft Ordinance (1185 : ADU Update)
Page 11 of 14
10.11. Residential service facilities, small;
11.12. Satellite television or personal internet broadband dishes/antenna (less than
three feet in diameter);
12.13. Schools - K-12, public;
13.14. Single-family dwellings;
14.15. Supportive housing;
15.16. Transitional housing.
SECTION 10. R-3 Zoning District Permitted Uses: Campbell Municipal Code Section
21.08.070.B (Permitted uses in R-3 (Multiple-family) zoning district) is amended to read
as follows with underlining indicating new text and strikeouts (strikeout) indicating deleted text:
1. Accessory structures;
2. Accessory dwelling units
2.3. Apartments;
3.4. Duplexes;
4.5. Family child day care homes, small;
5.6. Garage/yard sales, private;
6.7. Groundwater recharge facilities;
7.8. Home occupations;
8.9. Libraries, public;
9.10. Parks, public;
10.11. Residential care homes, small;
11.12. Residential service facilities, small;
12.13. Satellite television or personal internet broadband dishes/antenna (less than
three feet in diameter);
13.14. Schools - K-12, Public;
14.15. Single-family dwellings;
15.16. Supportive housing;
16.17. Transitional housing.
SECTION 11. Scope of Work: Campbell Municipal Code Section 18.32.010 (Definition
of "Scope of Work.") is amended to read as follows with underlining indicating new text
and strikeouts (strikeout) indicating deleted text: 18.32.010 - Definition of "Scope of Work."
17.b
Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Draft Ordinance (1185 : ADU Update)
Page 12 of 14
A project submitted as a "Remodel" or "Remodel and Addition," or a "Remodel of an accessory structure to create an accessory dwelling unit" (or similar scope of work) shall
instead be considered and defined as a "New Dwelling using portions of the original
structure" when at least three of the following criteria are satisfied:
1. The valuation of the proposed work exceeds one hundred eighty-five thousand dollars (valuation calculated using established Valuation Tables published by the International Code Council (ICC) and modified by the Building Division);
2. Seventy-five percent or more of the existing roof framing (Area) is proposed to
be removed. Existing roof covered by a new roof shall be considered as
removed for the purposes of this calculation;
3. Seventy-five percent or more of the existing exterior walls (Lineal Footage of Wall Length) are removed, altered, filled in, or rebuilt. In no event shall new
exterior walls exceed more than seventy-five percent of the length of the
existing exterior walls as determined by the building official. Nonconforming
exterior walls shall not be included in the twenty-five percent remaining calculation (this subsection shall not apply to a proposed conversion of an accessory structure to an accessory dwelling unit);
4. Seventy-five percent or more of the existing interior walls (Lineal Footage of
Wall Length) are removed, altered, filled in, or rebuilt. In no event shall new
interior walls exceed more than seventy-five percent of the length of the existing interior walls as determined by the building official.
SECTION 12. Non-Conforming Limitations: Campbell Municipal Code Section
21.58.050.F (Exceptions) is amended to read as follows with underlining indicating new
text and strikeouts (strikeout) indicating deleted text:
F. Exceptions. The following exceptions apply to all lawfully constructed structures, except for detached accessory dwelling units:
1. Failure to meet setbacks. A structure that fails to meet the setback
requirements for the zoning districts in which it is located may be added to or enlarged in compliance with the following criteria:
a. The structure was lawfully constructed;
b. The addition or enlargement is limited to the first floor;
c. The addition or enlargement does not decrease the existing setbacks;
d. Any upper story additions comply with the current setback requirements; and
e. When required by Chapter 21.42 (Site and architectural review) Tthe
decision-making body approving the site and architectural review
permit for the addition or enlargement finds that the addition or enlargement will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing in the neighborhood.
17.b
Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Draft Ordinance (1185 : ADU Update)
Page 13 of 14
2. Policy "E" of the San Tomas neighborhood plan.
a. Additions to legally existing structures in the San Tomas area may be
added to or enlarged as allowed under policy "E" of the San Tomas
neighborhood plan.
b. Policy "E" is incorporated herein by reference.
c. The map outlining the boundaries of the San Tomas area is maintained
at the community development department.
d. In the case of conflict between the San Tomas neighborhood plan
policy "E" and the requirements contained in this chapter, policy "E" of the plan shall prevail.
3.G. Repairs or alterations otherwise required by law shall be allowed.
Reconstruction required to reinforce unreinforced masonry structures or to
comply with building code requirements shall be allowed without the cost
limitations identified in subsection E of this section; provided the retrofitting and code compliance are limited exclusively to compliance with earthquake safety standards and other applicable building code requirements, including the
applicable provisions of state law (e.g., Title 24, California Code of Regulations,
etc.).
SECTION 13: Definitions of Driveway: The following definition is added to subsection D
of Campbell Municipal Code section 21.72.020 between the definitions of "Drive-through
/drive-up service/drive-up window" and "Dry cleaning" to read as follows, with
underlining indicating new text:
"Driveway" means a paved access way leading from a public right-of-way, or
from the edge of an easement forming a private street, to a parking lot, drive aisle,
parking circulation area, garage, off-street parking space, or loading space.
SECTION 14: Park Impact Fee Definition: The definition of "secondary living units" in
Campbell Municipal Code section 20.24.020(o) is amended to read as follows, with
underlining indicating new text and strikeouts (strikeouts) indicating deleted text:
20.24.020 - Definitions.
(o) "Secondary living units" means any accessory dwelling units and caretaker or employee housing units as so defined in Title 21 of this code or any residential
unit of less than six hundred forty square feet which is clearly secondary to the
main use of the property. Examples of units that are secondary include
caretakers quarters of less than six hundred forty square feet on a commercial
parcel or a pastor's residence of less than six hundred forty square feet on a church site.
17.b
Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Draft Ordinance (1185 : ADU Update)
Page 14 of 14
SECTION 14: This Ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days following its passage and adoption and shall be published, one time within fifteen (15) days upon
passage and adoption in the Campbell Express, a newspaper of general circulation in
the City of Campbell, County of Santa Clara.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _____ day of ____________, 2018 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers: ABSENT: Councilmembers: APPROVED:
________________________ Paul Resnikoff, Mayor ATTEST:
_______________________________ Wendy Wood, City Clerk
17.b
Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Attachment 2 - Draft Ordinance (1185 : ADU Update)
BASCOMHAMILTONSAN TOMAS EXPRESSWAYLEIGH1STDELL3RDHACIENDAVIRGINIACAPRIPOLLARDBUDDUNIONBUCKNALLLATIMERCENTRALRINCON2NDDARRYLWESTMONTBENTMIDWAYCAMPBELLKENNETHEMORYWALDOMCBAINCARLYNALMARIDAGALEHAZELRIDGELYMCGLINCYWESTON SMITHELAMMCCOYABBEYSILACCIAUDREYLOVELLWHITE OAKSCASTROWALNUTSUNNYOAKSCENTURYEL SOLYOHARRIETSTEINWAYHARRISONLINDADILLON4THSALMARALICERAILWAYAPRILSPRINGFIELDVICTORBOISEDOTGAYBUCKNAMCAL ADO ABBOTTHARDYSONUCACAMEOMILTONCONNIECAMDENSHELLEYCHERRYADRIENDIVISIONMILLICHHUNTTHERESAEDENROBINMONICAENSENADAYORKDAVIDESTHERSUPERIORLENORLISAREGINAADLERHOLLISPALO SANTOWHITWOODBISMARKVALESAN TOMAS AQUINOGWENMARILYNVILLARTIABURROWSSOBRATOPOPLARRICHLEEDUNSTERMARATHONHYDEKUEHNISHOFFMANGILMANCATALAPAPAGEAPRICOTCOLLEENINWOODHACKECHOFEWTRELLNADINENIDOCHRISTOPHERELWOOD HOLMESFRIARKENNEDYCREEKSIDEROSEMARYSUNNYSIDECRISTICHRAVENCOURTFULTONPEGGYPETERDEL PRADOSHADYDALEEL MOROMANCHESTERCRAIGORCHARD-CITYSUNBERRYEL CAMINITOMUNROOLD ORCHARDLAURALONG FELLOWPAULAEBBETSBLANDJEFFREYRICKYSHADLECAMPISINELLOWALTERSLOYALTONJANE-ANNROSEDENVERROBWAYINSKIPREDDINGARROYO-SECOARCHERREGASCALIFORNIASHAR PPEACHTREEJUANITASHARMON PALMSCHAPMANLA PRADERAMAPLEWILTONSONDRAGRIFFITHWATSONCLOVERLUCOTKIM-LOUISELLEWELLYNWENDELLHEDEGARDEMERSONWARWICKLA VONNERADFORDBEDALCROCKETTCRONWELLAMATONOTTINGHAMMARIANNAFAWNMORRENEGINDENJONESBEARDENVANDUSENPECANBRANBURYBAYWOODSCOTTMONETACOVENTRYKARAMEMPHISKAMSONSALICEFOOTESHEILAWEST VALLEYKINGSMONTEMARLOUISECYPRESSOBURNGOMESFLAMINGOVIA RANCHEROARNOTTFILBERTBETHFORMANWELKERMARGARETJIM ELDERPARKHURSTONTARIOROBNICKHURSTHAWTHORNEHAZELWOODREXESTRELITAQUEENSCHARLESTONBUCKNALLHERBERTVALEY FORGEMICHELLESANFORDWELLINGTONDECORAHECKERCORLISSMITCHELLEVERETTSHEREENFREDAST. PAULMCGLINCYBRACEBRIDGEMICHAELMARYHARRIETSHARONMOZ
AR TBETAGRACELATIMERSHEFFIELDEL PATIOMILTONARROYO-SECOWESTFIELDPARSONSWRENHARRISONGRANTRINCONWEST PARRRINCONCAM
D
E
NBASCOMCAMPBELL
MILTONWINCHESTERSAN TOMAS AQUINOSUNNYOAKSPAMLARPHANTOMROSEMARYCROCKETTPATIOHARRIETPEGGYMONICAMCBAINLLEWELLYNSALERNOERINNORMANDYCENTRAL PARKCAMBRIANHIGHLAND PARKDALLASCURTNERSHAMROCKSHAMROCKSTONEHURSTHAMILTONAINSLEY PARKLOST LAKEFLORENCE±City of Campbell04,3002,150FeetR-1 (Single-Family) Parcels R-1 Lot SizesUp to 6,999 SF7,000 to 7,999 SF8,000 to 8,999 SF9,000 to 9,999 SF10,000 SF +17.cPacket Pg. 289Attachment: Attachment 3 - Lot Size Map (1185 : ADU Update)
'DQLHO)DPD
)URP 6KLUOH\&KDQ VKLUOH\FKDQ#JPDLOFRP!
6HQW 0RQGD\)HEUXDU\ $0
7R 6KLUOH\&KDQ 'DQLHO)DPD ODUU\#DFWLYHRYHUFRP HPP#\DKRRFRP
PMWRZQ]HQ#DROFRP *%UDGOH\#PJURXSXV LQIR#VWDFFQDRUJ DNH\VHU
#JPDLOFRP YLQFH#VFFDRUFRP QHLQDYD\#JPDLOFRP VOI#VWURPERWQHODZFRP
GDQJRXZ#PVQFRP YRRGXH#KRWPDLOFRP FVHUULQ#\DKRRFRP
5-PDVLHOOR#VEFJOREDOQHW IUHGZHEHU#JPDLOFRP 'RQN\+RRW\ -RVK5R]D
6XEMHFW )ZG :1$&$'83DQHO)HEWK SP
Fowarding to the interest list from City of Campbell ADU.
Kirk Vartan, the President of WNAC (Winchester Neighborhood association) will be hosting a community
meeting focused on ADU's on 2/28 6:30-8:30pm.
This is what neighborhoods in the bay area are doing ....grass roots effort to drive and deliver options to our
housing crisis.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kirk Vartan <info@winchesternac.com>
Date: Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 6:43 PM
Subject: WNAC - ADU Panel - Feb 28th - 6:30pm
To: Shirley Chan <shirley@burbankcommunityassn.com>
TINY HOMES, MICRO UNITS &
COMMUNITY
The acronym ADU (Accessory Dwelling Unit, aka Granny Flat) is
bandied about with more frequency of late. This is because of
recently signed legislation that makes it easier for homeowners to
add additional living units to their property.
WNAC's 2/28 meeting will feature a panel of ADU experts who will
17.d
Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
address questions, such as:
ƒ What is an ADU and where can they be installed?
ƒ Is it possible for them to be self-contained or do I need sewer,
water & electricity connections?
ƒ I am tapped out and can't afford new financing. What are my
options?
ƒ What about the business case for putting one on my property?
ƒ What sort of tenants are interested in living in an ADU?
ƒ Is this a retirement option?
ƒ What is
an ADU
and
where
can they
be
installed?
ƒ Is it possible
for them to
be self-
contained or
do I need
sewer, water
& electricity
connections?
ƒ I am
tapped
out and
can't
afford
new
financing.
What are
my
options?
ƒ What
about the
business
case for
putting
one on
my
property?
ƒ What sort
of tenants
are
interested
in living in
an ADU?
17.d
Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
ƒ Is this a
retirement
option?
Panel:
Michael Brilliot, Division Manager, City of San Jose
Tony Chan - Founder & CEO of ADU Builder, Inc.
Eoin Matthews - Chief Business Officer - Point
David Roberson - Principal at Silicon Valley Property Management
Group & Author of Your Guide to Real Estate Investing
Senator Wieckowski is a HUGE supporter of ADUs as a part of the solution to our
housing crisis, sponsoring bills: SB-1069/SB 229 (passed) and SB-831 (pending)
Wednesday, February 28
6:30PM - 8:30 PM
Cypress Senior Community Center
403 Cypress Ave, San Jose
RSVP Now!
A light pizza dinner and cannoli will be provided. Please register
so we can plan accordingly. Drinks not provided.
For more details on the event, please go to the Winchester NAC
website. Hope to see you on Wednesday!
Kirk Vartan
President, Winchester NAC
17.d
Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
'DQLHO)DPD
)URP 0DU\-R7RZQ]HQ PMWRZQ]HQ#DROFRP!
6HQW :HGQHVGD\)HEUXDU\ $0
7R 'DQLHO)DPD
6XEMHFW 5H $FFHVVRU\'ZHOOLQJ8QLW $'8 2UGLQDQFH8SGDWH,QWHUHVW/LVW
Hi Daniel,
That's great! Glad the city of Campbell is looking into this further.
Here's the City of San Jose's definition of an ADU:
https://library.municode.com/ca/san_jose/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT20ZO_CH20.200DE_20.200.325DWSE
ACDWUNAD
Here's a link to a Q&A with item 8 addressing ADU's for City of San Jose:
http://www.sanjoseca.gov/faq.aspx?TID=60
Looks like City of San Jose is clarifying the issue as well. They held a meeting Monday, February 12th, the evening we
were at Canyon Heights. Please see the link below for the notice of that meeting.
http://www.sanjoseca.gov/documentcenter/view/74549
Please keep me posted as to the continence. I think decreasing the minimum lot size incrementally, from 10,000 to 9,000
would be a great start to see the impact that makes on surrounding infrastructure, traffic, tax revenue from more
residences, population, affordable housing supply, etc. It'd be interesting to know how many residential lots in Campbell
are between 9,000 and 10,000 square feet and would qualify. Even then, not all owners would elect to add the
ADU. Some might have already done so without the City of Campbell's knowledge and/or permission.
Have a happy Valentine's Day!
Sincerely,
Mary Jo Townzen
Mobile: 408-386-5761
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Fama <danielf@cityofcampbell.com>
To: 'myinbox50@gmail.com' <myinbox50@gmail.com>; 'larry@activeover50.com' <larry@activeover50.com>;
'shirleychan4@gmail.com' <shirleychan4@gmail.com>; 'emm21@yahoo.com' <emm21@yahoo.com>;
'mjtownzen@aol.com' <mjtownzen@aol.com>; 'GBradley@m-group.us' <GBradley@m-group.us>; 'info@staccna.org'
<info@staccna.org>; 'akeyser2000@gmail.com' <akeyser2000@gmail.com>; 'vince@sccaor.com' <vince@sccaor.com>;
'josh.roza@gmail.com' <josh.roza@gmail.com>; 'neinavay@gmail.com' <neinavay@gmail.com>;
'slf1@strombotnelaw.com' <slf1@strombotnelaw.com>; 'dangouw@msn.com' <dangouw@msn.com>;
'voodue2@hotmail.com' <voodue2@hotmail.com>; 'cserrin@yahoo.com' <cserrin@yahoo.com>;
'RJmasiello@sbcglobal.net' <RJmasiello@sbcglobal.net>; 'fred.weber@gmail.com' <fred.weber@gmail.com>
Sent: Wed, Feb 14, 2018 11:09 am
Subject: RE: Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Ordinance Update - Interest List
'ŽŽĚDŽƌŶŝŶŐʹƐƐŽŵĞŽĨLJŽƵŵĂLJŬŶŽǁ͕ƚŚĞWůĂŶŶŝŶŐŽŵŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƚŽŽŬĂĐƚŝŽŶƚŽĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞůĂƐƚŶŝŐŚƚ͛Ɛ
ƉƵďůŝĐŚĞĂƌŝŶŐƚŽĂĨƵƚƵƌĞĚĂƚĞ͘dŚŝƐŵĞĂŶƐƚŚĂƚƚŚĞƚĞŶƚĂƚŝǀĞDĂƌĐŚϮϬƚŚŝƚLJŽƵŶĐŝůŚĞĂƌŝŶŐǁŝůůŶŽƚŽĐĐƵƌ͘
17.d
Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
'DQLHO)DPD
)URP 6KLUOH\&KDQ VKLUOH\FKDQ#JPDLOFRP!
6HQW :HGQHVGD\)HEUXDU\ 30
7R 'RQN\+RRW\
&F 'DQLHO)DPD ODUU\#DFWLYHRYHUFRP HPP#\DKRRFRP PMWRZQ]HQ#DROFRP
*%UDGOH\#PJURXSXV LQIR#VWDFFQDRUJ DNH\VHU#JPDLOFRP YLQFH#VFFDRUFRP
MRVKUR]D#JPDLOFRP QHLQDYD\#JPDLOFRP VOI#VWURPERWQHODZFRP
GDQJRXZ#PVQFRP YRRGXH#KRWPDLOFRP FVHUULQ#\DKRRFRP
5-PDVLHOOR#VEFJOREDOQHW IUHGZHEHU#JPDLOFRP 9LQFHQW6\
6XEMHFW 5H $FFHVVRU\'ZHOOLQJ8QLW $'8 2UGLQDQFH8SGDWH,QWHUHVW/LVW
+ Vincent Sy (Campbell resident that I met through the WNAC ADU meeting tonight)
Interest list:
I wanted to give you an update as I was able to attend tonight's WNAC ADU discussion. Lively discussion,
packed room of interested residents from Santa Clara county and other counties in the bay area. There seems to
be a coalition of folks that want to make ADU's happen in the bay area as one of the many methods to solving
our current housing crisis. Some of the items City of San Jose is looking into for 2018 as it relates to ADU's
are: further reduction of lot size requirements (currently it's 5,445 sq ft), garage conversions, allowing larger
ADU's (above 900 sq ft). City of San Jose's goal is to build 25,000 housing units and would like to see a fair
amount of these housing units come from ADU's. Folks that attended tonight had various reasons for interest in
ADU's- having a family member live on the property to having an extra rental income. Great to see City of San
Jose step forward and relax ADU ordinances to make it easier to build. What really struck me was a middle
aged lady that currently lives in an ADU in Santa Clara. She had lived in luxury apartments but after a few
years, really got tired of the environment. She moved to an ADU in Santa Clara and absolutely loves the peace
and privacy. She was strongly advocating this as a housing method and wanted to see more of these built.
Hi Daniel,
• Is the city of Campbell planning to hold public workshops to gather public feedback on what the
residents would like to see change to the current ADU ordinance? City of San Jose is planning 3 of
these workshops in 2018.
• Would you be able to provide the interested list of folks with an update with where you are at on
research and potential proposals? I'd personally like to see a reduction or elimination of lot size
requirements, reduction of setback requirements, ability to build an ADU that's attached to a detached
garage, and to allow second story ADU's.
• One question that was raised during tonight's meeting was impact fees and how in some cities, these fees
could be $40-50k. Would you be able to provide this list, the estimated impact fees for building a 500
sq ft ADU?
Thanks
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 1:56 PM, DonkyHooty <myinbox50@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, Daniel,
I would propose we reduce the complexity of the table. While I am in favor of no minimum lot size
requirements, another proposal could be the following:
Lot Size, Max ADU
17.d
Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
'DQLHO)DPD
)URP *HRII%UDGOH\ *%UDGOH\#PJURXSXV!
6HQW 7XHVGD\$SULO 30
7R 'DQLHO)DPD
6XEMHFW )Z $'86XPPDU\6KHHWIRU6DQWD&ODUD&RXQW\
$WWDFKPHQWV $'8VLQ6DQWD&ODUD&RXQW\BY[OV[ MXULVGLFWLRQRUGLQDQFHV[OV[
,ŝĂŶŝĞůͲͲŚĞƌĞŝƐƐŽŵĞƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚƚŚĂƚǁĞĚŝĚŝŶƚĞƌŶĂůůLJŚĞƌĞĂƚŵͲŐƌŽƵƉůĂƐƚŵŽŶƚŚ͘&ĞĞůĨƌĞĞƚŽƵƐĞŝƚĂƐĂ
ƐƚĂƌƚŝŶŐƉŽŝŶƚŝĨŝƚŝƐŚĞůƉĨƵů͘
' K&&/͘Z> z͕/WͮWZ/E/W>нWZ ^/ Ed
DͲ'ZKhW
ͮ
E t ^/'EKEhZEW>EE/E'
WK>/zͼ ^/'Eͼ Es/ZKED Ed>ͼ,/^dKZ/ͼ E'' D Edͼ^d&&/E'
DW >>ͮ^EdZK^ͮEWͮ,ztZ
ϯϬϳKƌĐŚĂƌĚŝƚLJƌŝǀĞ͕^ƵŝƚĞϭϬϬͮĂŵƉďĞůůͮͮϵϱϬϬϴͮϰϬϴ͘ϯϰϬ͘ϱϲϰϮyϭϬϮ
&ƌŽŵ͗:ƵƐƚŝŶ^ŚŝƵ
^ĞŶƚ͗tĞĚŶĞƐĚĂLJ͕DĂƌĐŚϳ͕ϮϬϭϴϭϭ͗ϯϳD
dŽ͗'ĞŽĨĨƌĂĚůĞLJ
Đ͗<ƌŝƐƚŝĂƐĐŽŵ
^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗Z ͗h^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ŚĞĞƚĨŽƌ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌĂŽƵŶƚLJ
dŚĂŶŬƐ'ĞŽĨĨ͕
ƚƚĂĐŚĞĚŝƐĂŶƵƉĚĂƚĞĨŝůĞĂŶĚĂůŝƐƚŽĨƵƉĚĂƚĞĚhŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐƌĞĐĞŝǀĞĚďLJ,͘ůƐŽƐĞĞĐŽŵŵĞŶƚƐďĞůŽǁ͘
&ƌŽŵ͗'ĞŽĨĨƌĂĚůĞLJ
^ĞŶƚ͗tĞĚŶĞƐĚĂLJ͕DĂƌĐŚϳ͕ϮϬϭϴϭϬ͗ϱϰD
dŽ͗:ƵƐƚŝŶ^ŚŝƵф:^ŚŝƵΛŵͲŐƌŽƵƉ͘ƵƐх
Đ͗<ƌŝƐƚŝĂƐĐŽŵф<ĂƐĐŽŵΛŵͲŐƌŽƵƉ͘ƵƐх
^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗ZĞ͗h^ƵŵŵĂƌLJ^ŚĞĞƚĨŽƌ^ĂŶƚĂůĂƌĂŽƵŶƚLJ
ƚŚĂŶŬƐ:ƵƐƚŝŶ͊ƐŽŵĞƋƵĞƐƚŝŽŶƐ͗
tŚĂƚĚŽĞƐEŽƚZĞĐĞŝǀĞĚďLJ,ŵĞĂŶ͍ŽƚŚĞLJŶŽƚŚĂǀĞĂŶLJnjŽŶŝŶŐĐŽĚĞƐĨŽƌhƐ͍
,ŵĂŝŶƚĂŝŶƐĂůŝƐƚŽĨƵƉĚĂƚĞĚhŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐƚŚĂƚǁĞƌĞƐĞŶƚƚŽƚŚĞŵʹƚŚĞŵŽƐƚƌĞĐĞŶƚůŝƐƚǁĂƐĨƌŽŵ
ϮͬϮϳͬϭϴ͘dŚĞLJĂůƐŽŚĂǀĞW&ƐŽĨƚŚĞĂĚŽƉƚĞĚŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐůŝŶŬĞĚŝŶƚŚĞŝƌƐƉƌĞĂĚƐŚĞĞƚ;ĂƚƚĂĐŚĞĚͿ͘
ĨŽƌ^ĂƌĂƚŽŐĂĐĂŶLJŽƵŝŶĐůƵĚĞƚŚĞƌĞŐƵůĂƌZͲϭnjŽŶĞƐƚŚĞLJŚĂǀĞ͖ůŝŬĞLJŽƵĚŝĚĨŽƌƐΖǀĂůĞ͖/ƚŚŝŶŬƚŚĞƐŵĂůůĞƐƚŝƐZͲϭͲ
ϭϬǁŚŝĐŚŵĞĂŶƐƚŚĞLJǁŽƵůĚĂůůŽǁŝƚŽŶĂϵ͕ϬϬϬƐ͘Ĩ͘ůŽƚŵŝŶŝŵƵŵ͍
ĚĚĞĚ
ĨŽƌĐĂŵƉďĞůůŝŶĐůƵĚĞƚŚĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚƉĂƌŬĨĞĞ͗ΨϳϯϬϵ
17.d
Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
Attached Detached*Campbell Received by HCD, 2016https://library.municode.com/ca/campbell/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT21ZO_ART3DEOPST_CH21.23ACDWUN10000sf Based on lot size:10,000 sf lot = 700 sf ADU**For each additional 1,000 sf in lot size, there is a corresponding 100 sf increase in ADU size (max of 1,200 sf ADU). Also attached ADUs can't be more than 50% of existing primary dwelling.Zoning district req.Zoning district req. Park Impact Fee: in-lieu fee $7309No more than 2 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, and 1 kitchen.Design Review. Physical expansion or exterior alteration to an existing primary dwelling unit on a parcel that is subject to design review shall receive approval of the appropriate land use permit prior to submittal of ADU building permit.Constructed detached ADU shall have same materials and colors as primary; manufactured home only requires similar colors.Garages converted to ADUs shall include removal of garage doors.Front door of ADU not oriented toward public street.Cupertino Not confirmedhttp://www.cupertino.org/our-city/departments/community-development/planning/residential-development/accessory-dwelling-units10,000sf (if lot size is less it must be attached ADU, unless design is consistent with residence)10% of the net lot area, up to a maximum of 1,000 s.f., or 50 percent of the existing living space of the principal dwelling unit, whichever is more restrictive.Entrance screened from public street.Second story location only if: converting part of existing second story, attached to main dwelling, entry is not through exposed stair case, and does not intrude on privacy.Gilroy Received by HCD, 2018http://www.hcd.ca.gov/policy-research/docs/ordinances/gilroy-01-29-2018.pdfNo minimum 600 square feet, garages excluded. Attached shall be no more than 50% of primary dwelling.Zoning district req.6 foot side and rear. But if the ADU is closer than 5 feet to the primary dwelling, it shall comply with the zoning district setbacks.ADU entrances must be screened from street view.Window, door or deck of ADU designed to lessen views to adjacent property.ADU within historic site or neighborhood combining district is subject to design review procedures.Los Altos Not received by HCDLos Altos Hills Not received by HCDLos Gatos Not received by HCDMilpitas Not received by HCDMonte Sereno Received by HCD, 2017https://library.municode.com/ca/monte_sereno/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=MUCO_TIT10PLZO_CH10.06GEPR_10.06.140ACDWUNSTRE8000sf Based on zoning:R-1-8. 600sf attached, 900sf detached.R-1-20. 700sf attached, 1000sf detached.R-1-44. 800sf attached, 1200sf detached.Attached shall be no more than 50% of existing primary dwelling living area.ADU setbacks comply with setbacks of accessory structures in respective zoningWaive planning fees if agreement to rent to low/very-low income HH for no less than 10 yearsADU shall match the roof pitch and form of the primary dwelling.Only one main entrance visible from adjacent street.Morgan Hill Not received by HCDMountain View Not received by HCD, but foundhttp://www.mountainview.gov/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=19853No minimum 700sf habitable, and 200sf for garage Zoning district req.5 side, 10 rear Detached ADU must be a minimum of 10 feet from the primary dwelling.Palo Alto Received by HCD, 2017http://library.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll?f=jumplink$jumplink_x=Advanced$jumplink_vpc=first$jumplink_xsl=querylink.xsl$jumplink_sel=title;path;content-type;home-title;item-bookmark$jumplink_d=california(paloalto_ca)$jumplink_q=[field%20folio-destination-name:%2718.42.040%27]$jumplink_md=target-id=JD_18.42.0405000sf , except 10 acres in OS district600 sf attached, not exceeding 50% existing primary dwelling living area.900 sf detached.Associated parking excluded from ADU floor area calculation but included in site total floor area calc.Zoning district req.6 feet from the side and rear. 16' from the street side. Daylight plane 1:1 starting 8 feet above lot line.Window, door or deck designed to lessen views to adjacent property.When ADU would exceed lot coverage, ADU would not be included in lot coverage calculation if parcel meets minimum lot size or is substandard by no more than 10%When a new one-story ADU would exceed maximum floor area, an additional 175 square feet above the maximum otherwise permitted by the district is allowed. Only to accommodate ADU development.For detached ADUs, no windows, doors, mech equipment, vent system located within 6 feet of property line.Attached ADU entranceway not facing the same lot line as primary dwelling entranceway, unless second entranceway located in rear half of lot.Exterior stairs located towards interior sie or rear yard.San Jose Received by HCD, 2016https://library.municode.com/ca/san_jose/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT20ZO_CH20.30REZODI_PT2USAL_20.30.150SEUN5445sf 600 sf on 9000sf or less lot; 650 sf on 9000-10,000sf lot;800 sf on >10,000 sf lot.Attached shall be no more than 50% of existing primary dwelling living area.5 foot rear setback if not exceeding one story, and occupies no more than 50% of area between the 5 foot setback and rear setback.Any closet or enclosed storage area not to exceed 60sfADU shall match the roof pitch and form of the primary dwellingFront door of attached ADU shall not be on the same façade as front door of dwelling if the dwelling façade faces the street, unless a passageway would be required.Attached ADU shall be separated from dwelling no more than ten feet at any given point.Detached ADU shall be located in the rear yard; must be located at least 6 feet from the dwelling.Santa Clara Not received by HCD, but foundhttp://santaclaraca.gov/home/showdocument?id=53534No minimum Attached: 50% existing primary dwelling living area, up to 1200 sf. Detached 1200 sf. Does not include garage.5 side, 20 rear, 15 street side3 side, 5 rear, 15 street sideOn lots less than 6000sf, FAR of all structures shall not exceed 40%Second floor area shall not exceed 66% of first floor building area (including garage).Five foot front step back, 10 foot stepback if garage is closest to front property line.For 2nd story ADU, 3 foot side and rear setbacks from first floor walls, or clerestory windows with 5 foot sill height are required.Second floor balcony on rear elevation only and setback 15 feet from side lot line, with 4 feet max depth.Floor to ceiling height of second story must be equal to or less than the average for the first floor.Enclosed or internal staircases to access attached second story units are required.ADU and accessory buildings may not cover more than 40% of rear yard.Saratoga Not received by HCD, but foundhttps://library.municode.com/ca/saratoga/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=CH15ZORE_ART15-56ACDWUNR-1-10,000: 9000sf,R-1-12,500: 11,250sf,R-1-15,000: 13,500sf,R-1-20,000: 18,000,R-1-40,000: 36,000sf Attached: 50% existing primary dwelling living area, up to 1200 sf. Detached 1200 sf. Does not include garage.Zoning district req.Zoning district req. No more than 2 bedrooms.ADU shall be connected to public sewer system.Attached ADU served by either a common entrance or separate ADU entrance at side or rear.Sunnyvale Received by HCD, 2016https://qcode.us/codes/sunnyvale/view.php?topic=19-5-19_68-19_68_040&frames=onR-0: 6000sf,R-1: 8000sf,R-2: 5000sf700sf Zoning district req.Zoning district req. No detached unit in front of primary dwelling.Entrance of ADU and primary dwelling not on the same wall plane facing pulic street.Entrance of ADU above 1st floor shall not be on the same elevation as primary dwelling entrance.*Additionally, detached ADUs would comply with the state requirements for converted garage setback exceptions and ADUs above garage being set back 5 feet from the side and rear lot lines.Unique LimitationsFees applying to ADUs - impact City Status Link Min. Lot Size Square Feet LimitSetback17.dPacket Pg. 296Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
Jurisdiction Received/ Not
Received Ordinance Links
ADELANTO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
AGOURA HILLS Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬĂŐŽƵƌĂͲŚŝůůƐͲϬϭͲϭϴͲϮϬϭϴ͘ƉĚĨ
ALAMEDA Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬĂůĂŵĞĚĂͲĐŝƚLJͲϬϮͲϭϯͲϮϬϭϴ͘ƉĚĨ
ALAMEDA COUNTY Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬůĂŵĞĚĂͲŽƵŶƚLJͲϬϰͲϮϱͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
ALBANY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ALHAMBRA Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬĂůŚĂŵďƌĂͲϬϮͲϮϳͲϮϬϭϴ͘ƉĚĨ
ALISO VIEJO Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬĂůŝƐŽͲǀŝĞũŽͲϭϮͲϭϱͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
ALPINE COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ALTURAS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
AMADOR NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
AMADOR COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
AMERICAN
CANYON NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ANAHEIM Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬŶĂŚĞŝŵͲϵͲϮϭͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
ANDERSON NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ANGELS CAMP NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ANTIOCH Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬŶƚŝŽĐŚͲϬϮͲϬϵͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
APPLE VALLEY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ARCADIA Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬƌĐĂĚŝĂͲϬϳͲϭϮͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
ARCATA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ARROYO GRANDE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ARTESIA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ARVIN NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ATASCADERO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ATHERTON NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ATWATER NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
AUBURN NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
AVALON NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
AVENAL NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
AZUSA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
BAKERSFIELD NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
BALDWIN PARK NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
BANNING NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
BARSTOW Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬďĂƌƐƚŽǁͲϬϮͲϬϲͲϮϬϭϴ͘ƉĚĨ
BEAUMONT Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬĞĂƵŵŽŶƚͲϭϮͲϭϮͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
BELL NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
BELL GARDENS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
BELLFLOWER NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
BELMONT Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬĞůŵŽŶƚͲϬϱͲϮϯͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
BELVEDERE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
BENICIA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
BERKELEY Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬĞƌŬĞůĞLJͲϬϰͲϬϱͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
BEVERLY HILLS Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬĞǀĞƌůLJͲ,ŝůůƐͲϬϮͲϬϳͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
BIG BEAR LAKE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
BIGGS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
BISHOP NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
BLUE LAKE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
BLYTHE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
BRADBURY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
BRAWLEY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ORDINANCES RECEIVED BY HCD
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS (ADU)
The following list of received ordinances is current as of: February 27, 2018
17.d
Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
BREA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
BRENTWOOD NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
BRISBANE Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬƌŝƐďĂŶĞͲϬϰͲϮϱͲϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
BUELLTON NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
BUENA PARK NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
BURBANK NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
BURLINGAME Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬƵƌůŝŶŐĂŵĞͲ&ŝƌĞͲ^ƉƌŝŶŬůĞƌƐ͘ƉĚĨ
BUTTE COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CALABASAS Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬĐĂůĂďĂƐĂƐͲϭϭͲϭϲͲϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
CALAVERAS
COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CALEXICO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CALIFORNIA CITY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CALIMESA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CALIPATRIA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CALISTOGA Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬĂůŝƐƚŽŐĂͲϯͲϮϭͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
CAMARILLO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CAMPBELL Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬĂŵƉďĞůůͲϭϮͲϭϲͲϮϬϭϲ͘ƉĚĨ
CANYON LAKE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CAPITOLA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CARLSBAD Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬĐĂƌůƐďĂĚͲϭϬͲϮϴͲϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
CARMEL NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CARPINTERIA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CARSON NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CATHEDRAL NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CERES NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CERRITOS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CHICO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CHINO Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬŚŝŶŽͲϵͲϭϴͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
CHINO HILLS Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬĐŚŝŶŽͲŚŝůůƐͲϭϮͲϬϱͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
CHOWCHILLA Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬĐŚŽǁĐŚŝůůĂͲϬϭͲϭϮͲϭϴ͘ƉĚĨ
CHULA VISTA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CITRUS HEIGHTS Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬŝƚƌƵƐͲ,ĞŝŐŚƚƐͲϬϴͲϬϰͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
CLAREMONT NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CLAYTON NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CLEARLAKE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CLOVERDALE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CLOVIS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
COACHELLA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
COALINGA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
COLFAX NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
COLMA Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬŽůŵĂͲϬϳͲϬϳͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
COLTON NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
COLUSA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
COLUSA COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
COMMERCE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
COMPTON NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CONCORD Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬŽŶĐŽƌĚͲϬϰͲϭϮͲϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬĐŽŶƚƌĂͲĐŽƐƚĂͲĐŽͲϭϮͲϬϱͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
CORCORAN NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CORNING NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CORONA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CORONADO Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬĐŽƌŽŶĂĚŽͲϭϭͲϭϳͲϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
CORONADO
amended Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬĐŽƌŽŶĂĚŽͲĂŵĞŶĚĞĚͲϬϭͲϬϵͲ
ϮϬϭϴ͘ƉĚĨ
CORONADO
amended Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬĐŽƌŽŶĂĚŽͲϬϮͲϮϴͲϮϬϭϴͲ
ĂŵĞŶĚĞĚ͘ƉĚĨ
CORTE MADERA
ADU Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬŽƌƚĞͲDĂĚĞƌĂͲϬϭͲϬϵͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
17.d
Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
CORTE MADERA
JADU Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬŽƌƚĞͲDĂĚĞƌĂͲϬϭͲϬϵͲϮϬϭϳͲ
:h͘ƉĚĨ
COSTA MESA Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬĐŽƐƚĂͲŵĞƐĂͲϬϮͲϮϬͲϮϬϭϴ͘ƉĚĨ
COTATI NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
COVINA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CRESCENT CITY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CUDAHY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CULVER CITY Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬƵůǀĞƌͲŝƚLJͲϬϴͲϬϭͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
CUPERTINO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
CYPRESS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
DALY CITY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
DANA POINT NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
DANVILLE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
DAVIS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
DEL MAR NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
DEL NORTE
COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
DEL REY OAKS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
DELANO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
DESERT HOT
SPRINGS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
DIAMOND BAR NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
DINUBA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
DIXON NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
DORRIS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
DOS PALOS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
DOWNEY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
DUARTE Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬƵĂƌƚĞͲϬϰͲϮϬͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
DUBLIN NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
DUNSMUIR NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
EAST PALO ALTO Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ ĂƐƚͲWĂůŽͲůƚŽͲϭͲϯϭͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
EASTVALE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
EL CAJON Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ ůͲĂũŽŶͲϬϲͲϭϯͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
EL CENTRO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
EL CERRITO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
EL DORADO
COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
EL MONTE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
EL SEGUNDO Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ ůͲ^ĞŐƵŶĚŽͲϬϳͲϭϳͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
ELK GROVE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
EMERYVILLE Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬĞŵĞƌLJǀŝůůĞͲϭϭͲϮϴͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
ENCINITAS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ESCALON NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ESCONDIDO Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬĞƐĐŽŶĚŝĚŽͲϭϮͲϬϲͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
ETNA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
EUREKA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
EXETER NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
FAIRFAX Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬĨĂŝƌĨĂdžͲϭϭͲϭϯͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
FAIRFIELD Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬĨĂŝƌĨŝĞůĚͲϬϮͲϮϲͲϮϬϭϴ͘ƉĚĨ
FARMERSVILLE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
FERNDALE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
FILLMORE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
FIREBAUGH NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
FOLSOM Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ&ŽůƐŽŵͲϬϱͲϭϵͲϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
FONTANA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
FORT BRAGG NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
FORT JONES NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
FORTUNA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
FOSTER CITY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
FOUNTAIN VALLEY Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬĨŽƵŶƚĂŝŶͲǀĂůůĞLJͲϭϮͲϭϰͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
17.d
Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
FOWLER NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
FREMONT Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ&ƌĞŵŽŶƚͲϬϭͲϬϯͲϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
FRESNO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
FRESNO COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
FULLERTON Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ&ƵůůĞƌƚŽŶͲϬϵͲϭϴͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
GALT NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
GARDEN GROVE Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬŐĂƌĚĞŶͲŐƌŽǀĞͲϭϬͲϭϳͲϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
GARDENA Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ'ĂƌĚĞŶĂͲϬϴͲϮϮͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
GILROY Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬŐŝůƌŽLJͲϬϭͲϮϵͲϮϬϭϴ͘ƉĚĨ
GLENDALE Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ'ůĞŶĚĂůĞͲϬϰͲϬϰͲϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
GLENDORA Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ'ůĞŶĚŽƌĂͲϬϱͲϬϵͲϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
GLENN COUNTY RECEIVED BY HCD ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬŐůĞŶŶͲĐŽƵŶƚLJͲϭϬͲϮϯͲϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
GOLETA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
GONZALES NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
GRAND TERRACE Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ'ƌĂŶĚͲdĞƌƌĂĐĞͲϬϲͲϮϴͲϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
GRASS VALLEY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
GREENFIELD NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
GRIDLEY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
GROVER BEACH NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
GUADALUPE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
GUSTINE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
HALF MOON BAY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
HANFORD NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
HAWAIIAN
GARDENS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
HAWTHORNE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
HAYWARD Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬŚĂLJǁĂƌĚͲϭϭͲϯϬͲϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
HEALDSBURG Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ,ĞĂůĚƐďƵƌŐͲϬϮͲϬϯͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
HEMET Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬŚĞŵĞƚͲϬϭͲϮϮͲϮϬϭϴ͘ƉĚĨ
HERCULES NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
HERMOSA BEACH NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
HESPERIA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
HIDDEN HILLS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
HIGHLAND NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
HILLSBOROUGH NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
HOLLISTER NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
HOLTVILLE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
HUGHSON NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
HUMBOLDT
COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
HUNTINGTON
BEACH NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
HUNTINGTON
PARK NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
HURON NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
IMPERIAL NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
IMPERIAL BEACH NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
IMPERIAL COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
INDIAN WELLS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
INDIO Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬŝŶĚŝŽͲϭϬͲϮϰͲϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
INDUSTRY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
INGLEWOOD NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
INYO COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
IONE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
IRVINE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
IRWINDALE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ISLETON NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
JACKSON NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
JURUPA VALLEY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
KERMAN NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
KERN COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
17.d
Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
KING CITY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
KINGS COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
KINGSBURG NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LA CANADA
FLINTRIDGE Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬůĂͲĐĂŶĂĚĂͲĨůŝŶƚƌŝĚŐĞͲϭϭͲϮϴͲ
ϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
LA HABRA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LA HABRA
HEIGHTS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LA MESA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LA MIRADA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LA PALMA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LA PUENTE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LA QUINTA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LA VERNE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LAFAYETTE Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ>ĂĨĂLJĞƚƚĞͲϭϮͲϮϬͲϮϬϭϲ͘ƉĚĨ
LAGUNA BEACH NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LAGUNA HILLS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LAGUNA NIGUEL NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LAGUNA WOODS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LAKE COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LAKE ELSINORE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LAKE FOREST Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ>ĂŬĞͲ&ŽƌĞƐƚͲϬϳͲϭϮͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
LAKEPORT NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LAKEWOOD NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LANCASTER NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LARKSPUR NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LASSEN COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LATHROP NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LAWNDALE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LEMON GROVE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LEMOORE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LINCOLN NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LINDSAY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LIVE OAK NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LIVERMORE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LIVINGSTON NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LODI NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LOMA LINDA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LOMITA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LOMPOC NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LONG BEACH Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬůŽŶŐͲďĞĂĐŚͲϬϮͲϮϲͲϮϬϭϴ͘ƉĚĨ
LOOMIS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LOS ALAMITOS Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬůŽƐͲĂůĂŵŝƚŽƐͲϭϮͲϮϬͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
LOS ALTOS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LOS ALTOS HILLS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LOS ANGELES NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LOS ANGELES
COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LOS BANOS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LOS GATOS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LOYALTON NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
LYNWOOD NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MADERA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MADERA COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MADERA COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MALIBU NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MAMMOTH LAKES Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬDĂŵŵŽƚŚͲ>ĂŬĞƐͲϬϮͲϭϱͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
MANHATTAN
BEACH NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MANTECA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
17.d
Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
MARICOPA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MARIN COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MARINA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MARIPOSA
COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MARTINEZ NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MARYSVILLE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MAYWOOD NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MCFARLAND NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MENDOCINO
COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MENDOTA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MENIFEE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MENLO PARK NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MERCED NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MERCED COUNTY Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬDĞƌĐĞĚͲŽƵŶƚLJͲϭϮͲϮϲͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
MILL VALLEY Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬDŝůůͲsĂůůĞLJͲϬϮͲϭͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
MILLBRAE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MILPITAS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MISSION VIEJO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MODESTO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MODOC COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MONO COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MONROVIA Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬDŽŶƌŽǀŝĂͲϬϳͲϮϬͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
MONTAGUE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MONTCLAIR NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MONTE SERENO Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬDŽŶƚĞͲ^ĞƌĞŶŽͲϬϭͲϮϯͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
MONTEBELLO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MONTEREY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MONTEREY
COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MONTEREY PARK NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MOORPARK NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MORAGA Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬŵŽƌĂŐĂͲϬϯͲϬϭͲϮϬϭϴ͘ƉĚĨ
MORENO VALLEY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MORGAN HILL NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MORRO BAY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MOUNT SHASTA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MOUNTAIN VIEW NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
MURRIETA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
NAPA Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬEĂƉĂͲŝƚLJͲϬϰͲϭϯͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
NAPA COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
NATIONAL CITY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
NEEDLES NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
NEVADA CITY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
NEVADA COUNTY Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬŶĞǀĂĚĂͲĐŽƵŶƚLJͲϬϭͲϬϱͲϮϬϭϴ͘ƉĚĨ
NEWARK NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
NEWMAN NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
NEWPORT BEACH Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬEĞǁƉŽƌƚͲĞĂĐŚͲϬϵͲϭϭͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
NORCO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
NORWALK NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
NOVATO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
OAKDALE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
OAKLAND NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
OAKLEY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
OCEANSIDE Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬŽĐĞĂŶƐŝĚĞͲϭϬͲϭϭͲϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
OJAI Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬKũĂŝͲϵͲϳͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
ONTARIO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ORANGE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
17.d
Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
ORANGE COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ORANGE COVE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ORINDA Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬKƌŝŶĚĂͲϬϴͲϮϵͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
ORLAND NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
OROVILLE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
OXNARD Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬKdžŶĂƌĚͲϭϮͲϮϳͲϮϬϭϲ͘ƉĚĨ
PACIFIC GROVE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
PACIFICA Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬƉĂĐŝĨŝĐĂͲϭϬͲϮϯͲϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
PALM DESERT NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
PALM SPRINGS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
PALMDALE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
PALO ALTO Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬWĂůŽͲůƚŽͲϬϱͲϮϯͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
PALOS VERDES
ESTATES NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
PARADISE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
PARAMOUNT NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
PARLIER NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
PASADENA Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬWĂƐĂĚĞŶĂͲϬϯͲϭϯͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
PASO ROBLES NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
PATTERSON NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
PERRIS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
PETALUMA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
PICO RIVERA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
PIEDMONT Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬWŝĞĚŵŽŶƚͲϬϱͲϮϯͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
PINOLE Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬWŝŶŽůĞͲϬϵͲϮϲͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
PISMO BEACH NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
PITTSBURG NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
PLACENTIA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
PLACER COUNTY Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬƉůĂĐĞƌͲĐŽƵŶƚLJͲϭϮͲϭϯͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
PLACERVILLE Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬƉůĂĐĞƌǀŝůůĞͲϭϭͲϬϲͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
PLEASANT HILL NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
PLEASANTON Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬWůĞĂƐĂŶƚŽŶͲϲͲϭϯͲϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
PLUMAS COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
PLYMOUTH NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
POINT ARENA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
POMONA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
PORT HUENEME NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
PORTERVILLE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
PORTOLA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
PORTOLA VALLEY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
POWAY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
RANCHO
CORDOVA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
RANCHO
CUCAMONGA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
RANCHO MIRAGE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
RANCHO PALOS
VERDES NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
RANCHO ST.
MARGARITA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
RED BLUFF NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
REDDING Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬZĞĚĚŝŶŐͲϬϲͲϭϰͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
REDLANDS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
REDONDO BEACH NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
REDWOOD CITY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
REEDLEY Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬƌĞĞĚůĞLJͲϬϭͲϯϬͲϮϬϭϴ͘ƉĚĨ
RIALTO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
RICHMOND NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
RIDGECREST NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
RIO DELL NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
RIO VISTA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
RIPON NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
17.d
Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
RIVERBANK NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
RIVERSIDE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
RIVERSIDE
COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ROCKLIN NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ROHNERT PARK Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬZŽŚŶĞƌƚͲWĂƌŬͲϬϱͲϮϯͲϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
ROLLING HILLS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ROLLING HILLS
ESTATES NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ROSEMEAD NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ROSEVILLE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
ROSS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SACRAMENTO Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ^ĂĐƌĂŵĞŶƚŽͲŝƚLJͲϬϯͲϮϵͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
SACRAMENTO
COUNTY Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ^ĂĐƌĂŵĞŶƚŽͲŽƵŶƚLJͲϬϳͲϭϴͲ
ϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
SAINT HELENA Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬƐĂŝŶƚͲŚĞůĞŶĂͲϭϮͲϬϰͲϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
SALINAS Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ^ĂůŝŶĂƐͲϭϮͲϲͲϮϬϭϲ͘ƉĚĨ
SAN ANSELMO Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ^ĂŶͲŶƐĞůŵŽͲϬϰͲϮϰͲϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
SAN BENITO
COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SAN BERNARDINO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SAN BRUNO RECEIVED BY HCD ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ^ĂŶͲƌƵŶŽͲϬϱͲϭϭͲϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
SAN
BUENAVENTURA Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬƐĂŶͲďƵĞŶĂǀĞŶƚƵƌĂͲϭϭͲϭϯͲϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
SAN CARLOS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SAN CLEMENTE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SAN DIEGO Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬƐĂŶͲĚŝĞŐŽͲĐŝƚLJͲϬϵͲϮϭͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
SAN DIEGO
COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SAN DIMAS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SAN FERNANDO RECEIVED BY HCD ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ^ĂŶͲ&ĞƌŶĂŶĚŽͲŝƚLJͲϬϵͲϭϮͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
SAN FRANCISCO Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ^ĂŶͲ&ƌĂŶĐŝƐĐŽͲϴͲϯͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
SAN GABRIEL NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SAN JACINTO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SAN JOAQUIN NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SAN JOAQUIN
COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SAN JOSE Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ^ĂŶͲ:ŽƐĞͲϭϭͲϭϱͲϮϬϭϲĂ͘ƉĚĨ
SAN JUAN
BAUTISTA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SAN JUAN
CAPISTRANO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SAN LEANDRO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SAN LUIS OBISPO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SAN LUIS OBISPO
CO.NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SAN MARCOS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SAN MARINO RECEIVED BY HCD
sĞƌƐŝŽŶϯ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ^ĂŶͲDĂƌŝŶŽͲϬϱͲϬϮͲϭϳͲ
/ŶƚĞƌŝŵ ƉĚĨSAN MARINO RECEIVED BY HCD
sĞƌƐŝŽŶϰ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ^ĂŶͲDĂƌŝŶŽͲϬϱͲϭϲͲϭϳͲ
ŝŶƚĞƌŝŵ ĞdžƚĞŶƐŝŽŶ ƉĚĨ
SAN MATEO Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬƐĂŶͲŵĂƚĞŽͲĐŝƚLJͲϭϭͲϭϰͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
SAN MATEO
COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SAN PABLO Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ^ĂŶͲWĂďůŽͲϬϳͲϭϬͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
SAN RAFAEL NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SAN RAMON NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SAND CITY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SANGER NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SANTA ANA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SANTA BARBARA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
17.d
Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
SANTA BARBARA
COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SANTA CLARA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SANTA CLARA
COUNTY Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ^ĂŶƚĂͲůĂƌĂͲŽƵŶƚLJͲϬϳͲϮϭͲ
ϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
SANTA CLARITA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SANTA CRUZ NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SANTA CRUZ
COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SANTA FE
SPRINGS Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ^ĂŶƚĂͲ&ĞͲ^ƉƌŝŶŐƐͲϬϰͲϭϰͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
SANTA MARIA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SANTA MONICA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SANTA PAULA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SANTA ROSA Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ^ĂŶƚĂͲZŽƐĂͲϭϮͲϮϭͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
SANTEE Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ^ĂŶƚĞĞͲϬϯͲϭϳͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
SARATOGA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SAUSALITO Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬƐĂƵƐĂůŝƚŽͲϬϭͲϯϭͲϮϬϭϴ͘ƉĚĨ
SCOTTS VALLEY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SEAL BEACH NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SEASIDE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SEBASTOPOL Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬƐĞďĂƐƚŽƉŽůͲϬϮͲϮϴͲϮϬϭϴ͘ƉĚĨ
SELMA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SHAFTER NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SHASTA COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SHASTA LAKE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SIERRA COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SIERRA MADRE Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ^ŝĞƌƌĂͲDĂĚƌĞͲϭϮͲϮϯͲϮϬϭϲ͘ƉĚĨ
SIGNAL HILL NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SIMI VALLEY Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ^ŝŵŝͲsĂůůĞLJͲϬϯͲϭϯͲϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
SISKIYOU COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SOLANA BEACH Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ^ŽůĂŶĂͲĞĂĐŚͲϭϮͲϮϬͲϮϬϭϲ͘ƉĚĨ
SOLANO COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SOLEDAD NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SOLVANG NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SONOMA Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ^ŽŶŽŵĂͲŝƚLJͲϬϵͲϮϮͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
SONOMA COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SONORA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SOUTH EL MONTE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SOUTH GATE Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ^ŽƵƚŚͲ'ĂƚĞͲϬϱͲϮϯͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
SOUTH LAKE
TAHOE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SOUTH PASADENA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬƐŽƵƚŚͲƐĂŶͲĨƌĂŶĐŝƐĐŽͲϭϮͲϭϭͲ
ϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
STANISLAUS
COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
STANTON NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
STOCKTON NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SUISUN CITY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SUNNYVALE RECEIVED BY HCD hϯ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ^ƵŶŶLJǀĂůĞϭͲϭϮͲϲͲϮϬϭϲ͘ƉĚĨ
SUNNYVALE RECEIVED BY HCD hϰ͗ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬ^ƵŶŶLJǀĂůĞϮͲϭϮͲϲͲϮϬϭϲ͘ƉĚĨ
SUSANVILLE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SUTTER COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
SUTTER CREEK NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
TAFT NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
TEHACHAPI NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
TEHAMA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
TEHAMA COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
17.d
Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
TEMECULA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
TEMPLE CITY Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬdĞŵƉůĞͲŝƚLJͲϬϵͲϭϵͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
THOUSAND OAKS Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬdŚŽƵƐĂŶĚͲKĂŬƐͲϬϴͲϮϴͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
TIBURON Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬdŝďƵƌŽŶͲϬϮͲϬϲͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
TORRANCE Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬƚŽƌƌĂŶĐĞͲϬϱͲϭϲͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
TRACY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
TRINIDAD NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
TRINITY COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
TRUCKEE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
TULARE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
TULARE COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
TULELAKE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
TUOLUMNE
COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
TURLOCK NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
TUSTIN Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬdƵƐƚŝŶͲϬϰͲϭϴͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
TWENTYNINE
PALMS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
UKIAH Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬƵŬŝĂŚͲϬϴͲϮϮͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
UNION CITY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
UPLAND NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
VACAVILLE Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬǀĂĐĂǀŝůůĞͲϬϮͲϬϵͲϭϴ͘ƉĚĨ
VALLEJO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
VENTURA COUNTY Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬǀĞŶƚƵƌĂͲĐŽƵŶƚLJͲϬϱͲϭϴͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
VERNON NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
VICTORVILLE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
VILLA PARK NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
VISALIA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
VISTA Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬǀŝƐƚĂͲϭϭͲϬϲͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
WALNUT NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
WALNUT CREEK Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬǁĂůŶƵƚͲĐƌĞĞŬͲϭϭͲϭϰͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
WASCO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
WATERFORD NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
WATSONVILLE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
WEED NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
WEST COVINA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
WEST
HOLLYWOOD NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
WEST
SACRAMENTO NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
WESTLAKE
VILLAGE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
WESTMINSTER NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
WESTMORLAND NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
WHEATLAND NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
WHITTIER NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
WILDOMAR NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
WILLIAMS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
WILLITS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
WILLOWS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
WINDSOR Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬǁŝŶĚƐŽƌͲϬϭͲϭϬͲϮϬϭϴ͘ƉĚĨ
WINTERS NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
WOODLAKE NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
WOODLAND NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
WOODSIDE Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬǁŽŽĚƐŝĚĞͲϬϯͲϮϴͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
YOLO COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
YORBA LINDA Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬzŽƌďĂͲ>ŝŶĚĂͲϬϱͲϮϲͲϮϬϭϳ͘ƉĚĨ
YOUNTVILLE Z /s z,ŚƚƚƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ŚĐĚ͘ĐĂ͘ŐŽǀͬƉŽůŝĐLJͲƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚͬĚŽĐƐͬŽƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞƐͬLJŽƵŶƚǀŝůůĞͲϬϯͲϬϭͲϮϬϭϴ͘ƉĚĨ
YREKA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
17.d
Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
YUBA CITY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
YUBA COUNTY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
YUCAIPA NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
YUCCA VALLEY NOT RECEIVED BY HCD
17.d
Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
'DQLHO)DPD
)URP /DUU\+D\HV ODUU\#DFWLYHRYHUFRP!
6HQW 6XQGD\$SULO 30
7R 'RQN\+RRW\ 6KLUOH\&KDQ
&F 'DQLHO)DPD HPP#\DKRRFRP PMWRZQ]HQ#DROFRP *%UDGOH\#PJURXSXV
LQIR#VWDFFQDRUJ DNH\VHU#JPDLOFRP YLQFH#VFFDRUFRP MRVKUR]D#JPDLOFRP
QHLQDYD\#JPDLOFRP VOI#VWURPERWQHODZFRP GDQJRXZ#PVQFRP YRRGXH
#KRWPDLOFRP FVHUULQ#\DKRRFRP 5-PDVLHOOR#VEFJOREDOQHW IUHGZHEHU#JPDLOFRP
9LQFHQW6\
6XEMHFW 5H $FFHVVRU\'ZHOOLQJ8QLW $'8 2UGLQDQFH8SGDWH,QWHUHVW/LVW
The Campbell Planning Department wants ADUs. Campbell homeowners want ADUs—with changes:
Reduced minimum lot size or no lot size requirement like many other Bay Area cities. Plus reduced permit
fees and faster turnaround.
Let’s speed up the process and make it happen.
Larry
Larry W. Hayes
CEO/Publisher
408.921.5806
Larry@ActiveOver50.com
http://www.ActiveOver50.com
&ƌŽŵ͗ŽŶŬLJ,ŽŽƚLJфŵLJŝŶďŽdžϱϬΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵх
ĂƚĞ͗&ƌŝĚĂLJ͕Ɖƌŝůϭϯ͕ϮϬϭϴĂƚϴ͗ϭϳD
dŽ͗^ŚŝƌůĞLJŚĂŶфƐŚŝƌůĞLJĐŚĂŶϰΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵх
Đ͗ĂŶŝĞů&ĂŵĂфĚĂŶŝĞůĨΛĐŝƚLJŽĨĐĂŵƉďĞůů͘ĐŽŵх͕>ĂƌƌLJ,ĂLJĞƐфůĂƌƌLJΛĂĐƚŝǀĞŽǀĞƌϱϬ͘ĐŽŵх͕
ΗĞŵŵϮϭΛLJĂŚŽŽ͘ĐŽŵΗфĞŵŵϮϭΛLJĂŚŽŽ͘ĐŽŵх͕ΗŵũƚŽǁŶnjĞŶΛĂŽů͘ĐŽŵΗфŵũƚŽǁŶnjĞŶΛĂŽů͘ĐŽŵх͕
Η'ƌĂĚůĞLJΛŵͲŐƌŽƵƉ͘ƵƐΗф'ƌĂĚůĞLJΛŵͲŐƌŽƵƉ͘ƵƐх͕ΗŝŶĨŽΛƐƚĂĐĐŶĂ͘ŽƌŐΗфŝŶĨŽΛƐƚĂĐĐŶĂ͘ŽƌŐх͕
ΗĂŬĞLJƐĞƌϮϬϬϬΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵΗфĂŬĞLJƐĞƌϮϬϬϬΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵх͕ΗǀŝŶĐĞΛƐĐĐĂŽƌ͘ĐŽŵΗфǀŝŶĐĞΛƐĐĐĂŽƌ͘ĐŽŵх͕
ΗũŽƐŚ͘ƌŽnjĂΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵΗфũŽƐŚ͘ƌŽnjĂΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵх͕ΗŶĞŝŶĂǀĂLJΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵΗфŶĞŝŶĂǀĂLJΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵх͕
ΗƐůĨϭΛƐƚƌŽŵďŽƚŶĞůĂǁ͘ĐŽŵΗфƐůĨϭΛƐƚƌŽŵďŽƚŶĞůĂǁ͘ĐŽŵх͕ΗĚĂŶŐŽƵǁΛŵƐŶ͘ĐŽŵΗфĚĂŶŐŽƵǁΛŵƐŶ͘ĐŽŵх͕
ΗǀŽŽĚƵĞϮΛŚŽƚŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵΗфǀŽŽĚƵĞϮΛŚŽƚŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵх͕ΗĐƐĞƌƌŝŶΛLJĂŚŽŽ͘ĐŽŵΗфĐƐĞƌƌŝŶΛLJĂŚŽŽ͘ĐŽŵх͕
ΗZ:ŵĂƐŝĞůůŽΛƐďĐŐůŽďĂů͘ŶĞƚΗфZ:ŵĂƐŝĞůůŽΛƐďĐŐůŽďĂů͘ŶĞƚх͕ΗĨƌĞĚ͘ǁĞďĞƌΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵΗ
фĨƌĞĚ͘ǁĞďĞƌΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵх͕sŝŶĐĞŶƚ^LJфǀŝŶĐĞƐLJΛLJĂŚŽŽ͘ĐŽŵх
^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗ZĞ͗ĐĐĞƐƐŽƌLJǁĞůůŝŶŐhŶŝƚ;hͿKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞhƉĚĂƚĞͲ/ŶƚĞƌĞƐƚ>ŝƐƚ
Shirley,
Thank you for the article. I hope the Campbell Planning Department and Commission accelerates their assessment
on ADU viability and becomes a leader for other california cities to promote better AU policies.
Best Regards,
My
17.d
Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
From:Rahmatollah Ahmadi
To:Daniel Fama
Subject:1077 Longfellow Ave.
Date:Friday, March 23, 2018 11:40:25 AM
Hello;
We own this house for the past 25 years. We wish to create a secondary unit withinthis property but the planning department tells us that since the land is less than10,000 sq.ft. we are not allowed to.
Our land is backed against the highway 85 and a section of 200 sq. ft. is left to ouruse by the transportation department. This is because the wall is further away fromour property and have created this strip of vacant and unusable by thetransportation department.
the transportation department has no immediate use for this strip of land. and tellsus we can count it as our backyard in exchange for occasional access of thedepartment to the wall through our property.
. The planning department does not recognize this section for the consideration ofthe 10,000 requirement.
They told me that you are working on adjusting these requirements to better reflectthe housing need of the city.
Please keep me in your mailing list and let me know what changes you are making.Also I would appreciate if you consider those properties like ours that have somestrip of land dedicated to them but not on the deed. Certainly this is a piece of landto count on.
Sincerely Yours
BJ Ahmadi(408) 406-0034
17.d
Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
)URP FKDUOHVVHUULQ
7R 'DQLHO)DPD
6XEMHFW 5H $FFHVVRU\'ZHOOLQJ8QLW $'8 2UGLQDQFH8SGDWH,QWHUHVW/LVW
'DWH 7XHVGD\)HEUXDU\ $0
$WWDFKPHQWV LPDJHSQJLPDJHSQJ
'DQLHO
,QORRNLQJDWWKHSGIPRUH,DPYHU\VXUSULVHGWKDW0LQ/RW6L]HQRWEHLQJUHGXFHGLQ
WRQLJKW
VPHHWLQJ :K\QRWFRQVLGHUUHGXFWLRQWRPLQORWVL]H" ,XQGHUVWDQGRWKHU
SODQQLQJYDULDEOHVEXWVHHPVVRREYLRXVDUHGXFWLRQLVQHHGHGQRWDEO\LQWKLVYHU\
VWUHVVHGRXWDQGODFNRIKRXVLQJ
$/VRFRQIXVLQJLVWKDWZRUGLQJDOPRVWDSSHDUVWKDW$'8LVDOORZHGRQDQ\VLQJOHIDPLO\
]RQLQJ 'RHVWKDWPHDQWKDW,FDQVLPSO\DSSO\IRUDQ$'8SHUPLWUHJDUGOHVV"
"&DQ,MXVWJHWDQ
([FHSWLRQ
ZKHQ,DSSO\IRUDSHUPLW" DVP\*DUDJHFRQYHUVLRQLV
SHUIHFWVLWXDWLRQIRU$'8
SJ $OORZDEOH=RQLQJ'LVWULFWV &XUUHQWO\DQ$'8PD\EHRQO\FUHDWHGRQD
SDUFHOZLWKLQRQHRIWKH5]RQLQJGLVWULFWV6WDWHODZQRZUHTXLUHVWKH&LW\WR
DOORZDQ$'8LQDQ\]RQLQJGLVWULFWZKHUHDVLQJOHIDPLO\KRPHFRXOGEH
FRQVWUXFWHG
27KHUQRWHGEXOOHWVLQ\RXUGRFXPHQWMXVWFRQILUPLQJ,VHHWKHVH
7KH&RXQFLOODVWGLVFXVVHGDUHGXFWLRQWRWKHPLQLPXPORWDUHDDWDQ$XJXVW
+RXVLQJ(OHPHQW6WXG\6HVVLRQ+RZHYHUDVZDVQRWHGLQWKH-DQXDU\
3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQ+RXVLQJ(OHPHQW6WDII5HSRUWWKH&RXQFLOGHFLGHGWR
PDLQWDLQWKHH[LVWLQJVTXDUHIRRWPLQLPXPORWDUHD
3XEOLF&RPPHQW 6WDIIUHFHLYHGWKHDWWDFKHGHPDLOVRQWKLVPDWWHU UHIHUHQFH
$WWDFKPHQW ZLWKVHYHUDOUHVLGHQWVXUJLQJDUHGXFWLRQWRWKHVTXDUH
IRRWPLQLPXPORWVL]H
,SUREDEO\VKRXOGFDOOEXWEHW\RXDUHVXSHUEXV\ZLWKSUHSDULQJIRUWRQLJKW
VPHHWLQJ ,
KRSHPDQ\SHRSOHWKDWZURWHOHWWHUVDQGPRUHVKRZXSWRQLJKWWRSXVKIRUUHGXFWLRQ
$WWKHOHDVWDOORZH[FHSWLRQVIRUWKRVHWKDWDUHYHU\FORVHO\DOLJQHGWRWKHLQWHQWDQG
LQWHJULW\RIDJUHDW$'8FRQYHUVLRQ
7KDQNVDJDLQ
a&KXFN
)URP FKDUOHVVHUULQ FVHUULQ#\DKRRFRP!
7R 'DQLHO)DPD GDQLHOI#FLW\RIFDPSEHOOFRP!
6HQW 7XHVGD\)HEUXDU\ $0
6XEMHFW 5H $FFHVVRU\'ZHOOLQJ8QLW $'8 2UGLQDQFH8SGDWH,QWHUHVW/LVW
'DQLHO
7KDQN\RXIRUUHSUHVHQWLQJWKLVDVWKLVLV9(5<LPSRUWDQWWRPHDQGP\IXWXUHSODQV
QHZ1(('6 ,KDYHP\NLGVWRQLJKWVRFDQQRWJHWWRWKHPHHWLQJXQIRUWXQDWHO\
,GLG
127
VHHLQDJHQGDWKDW\RXVSHFLILFDOO\DUHSURSRVLQJD
5('8&7,21
WR
0,1,080/RW6L]H
"" $P,PLVVLQJVRPHWKLQJZKHQ,UHDGLW" RUDUH\RXLQIDFW
17.d
Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
JRLQJWRSURSRVHDFKDQJHWRWKHPLQORWVL]H""
<RXUDWWDFKPHQWKDVPDQ\OHWWHUVH[SUHVVLQJVLPLODUQHHGVRIUHGXFWLRQLQWKH
0LQ/RW
6L]H
6RPHKDYHJRRGYDOXHSURSVDQGUHDVRQV 0LQH LVVLPLODUEXW,
OOGRYHU\
VLPSOHZULWHXSLQFDVHDQRWKHUUHVLGHQW
VQHHGVZRXOGKHOS
1HZO\6LQJOH'DGILQDQFLDOO\QHHGVWRUHQWRXWYHU\ZHOOVWUXFWXUHGPDWFKHVKRXVH
IUHHVWDQGLQJORQJGULYHZD\DQGIXOO\HQFORVHG*DUDJH
1RWH ,QHHGWRUHQWJDUDJHRXWILQDQFLDOO\DVUHFHQWGLYRUFHSD\PHQWVGHPDQG
WKLV ,KDYHOLWWOHJLUOVVRDURRPPDWHLV127DQRSWLRQ,ZLOOFRQVLGHU
)RRWSULQWZLOOVWD\VDPH 6DPHH[LVWLQJJDUDJHH[WHULRUDQGIRRWSULQWLWLV
FXUUHQWO\ -XVWXSGDWLQJLQVLGHWRUHQWDEOHDQGYHU\FRPIRUWDEOH
,ZLOOGRWKLVYHU\SURIHVVLRQDOO\DQGRIKLJKHVWGHVLJQTXDOLW\DQGPDWHULDOV
,SODQWRKDYHDWHQDQWWKDWLVORFDOZRUNLQJFODVVWKDWZLOOJUHDWO\EHQHILWIRUPWKH
H[WUHPHVKRUWDJHLQKRXVLQJ
/RWVL]HLV VTIW +RXVHLVRQO\VTIW ([LVWLQJJDUDJHLVVTIWDQGRQ
UHDUKDOIRIORW 'ULYHZD\IURPIURQWWREDFNJDUDJHDQGOLNHIWZLGH
-XVWPLOHVIURPGRZQWRZQDQGOHVVWKDQPLOHVIURP97$/LJKW5DLO3XEOLF
7UDQVSRUWDWLRQVWRS KDPLOWRQ
7KDQNVIRU\RXUWLPHDQGUHSUHVHQWDWLRQ
a&KXFN
)URP 'DQLHO)DPD GDQLHOI#FLW\RIFDPSEHOOFRP!
7R
6HQW :HGQHVGD\)HEUXDU\ 30
6XEMHFW 5( $FFHVVRU\'ZHOOLQJ8QLW $'8 2UGLQDQFH8SGDWH,QWHUHVW/LVW
*RRG$IWHUQRRQ±7KH3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQDJHQGDKDVQRZEHHQSRVWHGWRWKH
ZHEVLWH VHHOLQNEHORZ 7KH$'82UGLQDQFHXSGDWHLVDJHQGL]HGDV,WHP
PHDQLQJWKDWLWZLOOEHKHDUGSURPSWO\DW 30,I\RXKDYHDQ\TXHVWLRQVSOHDVH
IHHOIUHHWRFDOORUHPDLO
KWWS ZZZFLW\RIFDPSEHOOFRP$JHQGD&HQWHU9LHZ)LOH$JHQGDB
'DQLHO
'DQLHO)DPD
6HQLRU3ODQQHU
&LW\RI&DPSEHOO_&RPPXQLW\'HYHORSPHQW'HSDUWPHQW
1)LUVW6WUHHW_&DPSEHOO&$
ZZZFLW\RIFDPSEHOOFRP_
)URP 'DQLHO)DPD
6HQW )ULGD\-DQXDU\ 30
6XEMHFW 5( $FFHVVRU\'ZHOOLQJ8QLW $'8 2UGLQDQFH8SGDWH,QWHUHVW/LVW
17.d
Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
)URP *HRII%UDGOH\
7R /DUU\+D\HV 'DQLHO)DPD VKLUOH\FKDQ#JPDLOFRP
&F P\LQER[#JPDLOFRP HPP#\DKRRFRP PMWRZQ]HQ#DROFRP LQIR#VWDFFQDRUJ DNH\VHU#JPDLOFRP YLQFH#VFFDRUFRP MRVKUR]D#JPDLOFRP QHLQDYD\#JPDLOFRP VOI#VWURPERWQHODZFRP GDQJRXZ#PVQFRP YRRGXH#KRWPDLOFRP FVHUULQ#\DKRRFRP 5-PDVLHOOR#VEFJOREDOQHW IUHGZHEHU#JPDLOFRP
6XEMHFW 5H $FFHVVRU\'ZHOOLQJ8QLW $'8 2UGLQDQFH8SGDWH,QWHUHVW/LVW
'DWH :HGQHVGD\)HEUXDU\ 30
$WWDFKPHQWV LPDJHSQJLPDJHSQJ&'( ($'&'' >@SQJ
,ŝͲͲdŚĂŶŬLJŽƵĨŽƌƚŚŝƐŝŶĨŽƌŵĂƚŝŽŶ͘&ŽƌƚŚŽƐĞŝŶƚĞƌĞƐƚĞĚŝŶƚŚŝƐƚŽƉŝĐ/ƌĞĐŽŵŵĞŶĚƚŚŝƐŬ͗
ĂĐŬLJĂƌĚZĞǀŽůƵƚŝŽŶ͗dŚĞĞĨŝŶŝƚŝǀĞ'ƵŝĚĞƚŽhĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ
ďLJ<ŽůWĞƚĞƌƐŽŶͲϮϬϭϴ
/ŚĂĚƚŚĞŐŽŽĚĨŽƌƚƵŶĞƚŽŚĞĂƌƚŚĞĂƵƚŚŽƌƐƉĞĂŬĂƚĂŶĞǀĞŶƚŚŽƐƚĞĚďLJϮϭ ůĞŵĞŶƚƐ͖ĂŐƌŽƵƉĐŽŵƉƌŝƐĞĚŽĨ
ĂůůϮϬĐŝƚŝĞƐŝŶ^ĂŶDĂƚĞŽŽƵŶƚLJ͕ƉůƵƐƚŚĞĐŽƵŶƚLJŝƚƐĞůĨĚĞĚŝĐĂƚĞĚƚŽŚŽƵƐŝŶŐŝƐƐƵĞƐ͘dŚŝƐŝƐĐŽŵƉƌĞŚĞŶƐŝǀĞ
ĂŶĂůLJƐŝƐŽĨhƐĂŶĚƚŚĞďĂƌƌŝĞƌƐƚŽƚŚĞŵƚŚĂƚĂƌĞƚLJƉŝĐĂů͕ĂŶĚŽĨƚĞŶŽǀĞƌĐŽŵĞďLJŵŽƚŝǀĂƚĞĚ
ĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚŝĞƐ͘
hƐƌĞƉƌĞƐĞŶƚĂƵŶŝƋƵĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚLJƚŽŚĂƌŶĞƐƐƚŚĞǀĂƐƚĂŵŽƵŶƚŽĨůĂŶĚĚĞǀŽƚĞĚƚŽƐŝŶŐůĞĨĂŵŝůLJŚŽŵĞƐ
ƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞŽƉƉŽƌƚƵŶŝƚŝĞƐĨŽƌƚŚĞĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚŽĨŵĂŶLJƐŵĂůů͕ĚŝƐƉĞƌƐĞĚ͕ŶŽͲŝŵƉĂĐƚŚŽƵƐŝŶŐƵŶŝƚƐƚŽƐĞƌǀĞ
ƚŚŽƐĞŵŽƐƚŝŶŶĞĞĚŽĨƐĂĨĞΘĚĞĐĞŶƚŚŽƵƐŝŶŐ͘
DŝŶŝŵƵŵůŽƚƐŝnjĞƐĂƌĞŶŽƚĐŽŶƐŝƐƚĞŶƚǁŝƚŚƐƚĂƚĞůĂǁĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJĂŶĚƐŚŽƵůĚŶŽƚďĞƵƐĞĚĞdžĐĞƉƚƚŽƉƌŽƚĞĐƚ
ƐĞŶƐŝƚŝǀĞĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚĂůĂƌĞĂƐ͘
ĂŶŝĞů͕ŝĨLJŽƵĐŽƵůĚĨŽƌǁĂƌĚƚŚŝƐĞŵĂŝůĐŚĂŝŶƚŽƚŚĞWŵĞŵďĞƌƐ/ǁŽƵůĚĂƉƉƌĞĐŝĂƚĞŝƚ͘
ƚŚĂŶŬƐ͕
' K&&/͘Z> z͕/WͮWZ/E/W>нWZ ^/ Ed
DͲ'ZKhWͮE t ^/'EKEhZEW>EE/E'
WK>/zͼ ^/'Eͼ Es/ZKED Ed>ͼ,/^dKZ/ͼ E'' D Edͼ^d&&/E'
DW >>ͮ^EdZK^ͮEWͮ,ztZ
ϯϬϳKƌĐŚĂƌĚŝƚLJƌŝǀĞ͕^ƵŝƚĞϭϬϬͮĂŵƉďĞůůͮͮϵϱϬϬϴͮϰϬϴ͘ϯϰϬ͘ϱϲϰϮyϭϬϮ
&ƌŽŵ͗>ĂƌƌLJ,ĂLJĞƐфůĂƌƌLJΛĂĐƚŝǀĞŽǀĞƌϱϬ͘ĐŽŵх
^ĞŶƚ͗tĞĚŶĞƐĚĂLJ͕&ĞďƌƵĂƌLJϭϰ͕ϮϬϭϴϮ͗ϰϮWD
dŽ͗ĂŶŝĞů&ĂŵĂ͖ƐŚŝƌůĞLJĐŚĂŶϰΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵ
Đ͗ŵLJŝŶďŽdžϱϬΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵ͖ĞŵŵϮϭΛLJĂŚŽŽ͘ĐŽŵ͖ŵũƚŽǁŶnjĞŶΛĂŽů͘ĐŽŵ͖'ĞŽĨĨƌĂĚůĞLJ͖ŝŶĨŽΛƐƚĂĐĐŶĂ͘ŽƌŐ͖
ĂŬĞLJƐĞƌϮϬϬϬΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵ͖ǀŝŶĐĞΛƐĐĐĂŽƌ͘ĐŽŵ͖ũŽƐŚ͘ƌŽnjĂΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵ͖ŶĞŝŶĂǀĂLJΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵ͖
ƐůĨϭΛƐƚƌŽŵďŽƚŶĞůĂǁ͘ĐŽŵ͖ĚĂŶŐŽƵǁΛŵƐŶ͘ĐŽŵ͖ǀŽŽĚƵĞϮΛŚŽƚŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵ͖ĐƐĞƌƌŝŶΛLJĂŚŽŽ͘ĐŽŵ͖
Z:ŵĂƐŝĞůůŽΛƐďĐŐůŽďĂů͘ŶĞƚ͖ĨƌĞĚ͘ǁĞďĞƌΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵ
^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗ZĞ͗ĐĐĞƐƐŽƌLJǁĞůůŝŶŐhŶŝƚ;hͿKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞhƉĚĂƚĞͲ/ŶƚĞƌĞƐƚ>ŝƐƚ
+L'DQLHO
$OORZLQJ$'8¶VWREHEXLOWLQ&DPSEHOORQVPDOOHUORWV LVDQLPSRUWDQWSLHFHRIWKHKRXVLQJ
17.d
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
)URP *HRII%UDGOH\
7R 'DQLHO)DPD
6XEMHFW 5H $FFHVVRU\'ZHOOLQJ8QLW $'8 2UGLQDQFH8SGDWH,QWHUHVW/LVW
'DWH :HGQHVGD\-DQXDU\ $0
$WWDFKPHQWV LPDJHSQJ
7KDQNV'DQLHO,ZRXOGHQFRXUDJH\RXWRWDNHJXLGDQFHIURPWKH+&'$'80HPRGDWHG
SDJH HPSKDVLVDGGHG
&DQD/RFDO*RYHUQPHQW$SSO\'HYHORSPHQW6WDQGDUGVDQG'HVLJQDWH$UHDV"<HV
ORFDOJRYHUQPHQWVPD\DSSO\GHYHORSPHQWVWDQGDUGVDQGPD\GHVLJQDWHZKHUH$'8VDUH
SHUPLWWHG *&6HFWLRQV D $ DQG % +RZHYHU$'8VZLWKLQH[LVWLQJ
VWUXFWXUHVPXVWEHDOORZHGLQDOOVLQJOHIDPLO\UHVLGHQWLDO]RQHV)RU$'8VWKDWUHTXLUHDQ
DGGLWLRQRUDQHZDFFHVVRU\VWUXFWXUHGHYHORSPHQWVWDQGDUGVVXFKDVSDUNLQJKHLJKWORW
FRYHUDJHORWVL]HDQGPD[LPXPXQLWVL]HFDQEHHVWDEOLVKHGZLWKFHUWDLQOLPLWDWLRQV$'8V
FDQEHDYRLGHGRUDOORZHGWKURXJKDQDQFLOODU\DQGVHSDUDWHGLVFUHWLRQDU\SURFHVVLQDUHDV
ZLWKKHDOWKDQGVDIHW\ULVNVVXFKDVKLJKILUHKD]DUGDUHDV+RZHYHUVWDQGDUGVDQGDOORZDEOH
DUHDVPXVWQRWEHGHVLJQHGRUDSSOLHGLQDPDQQHUWKDWEXUGHQVWKHGHYHORSPHQWRI$'8V
DQGVKRXOGPD[LPL]HWKHSRWHQWLDOIRU$'8GHYHORSPHQW'HVLJQDWLQJDUHDVZKHUH$'8VDUH
DOORZHGVKRXOGEHDSSURDFKHGSULPDULO\RQKHDOWKDQGVDIHW\LVVXHVLQFOXGLQJZDWHUVHZHU
WUDIILFIORZDQGSXEOLFVDIHW\8WLOL]LQJDSSURDFKHVVXFKDVUHVWULFWLYHRYHUOD\VOLPLWLQJ
$'8VWRODUJHUORWVL]HVEXUGHQVRPHORWFRYHUDJHDQGVHWEDFNVDQGSDUWLFXODUO\
FRQFHQWUDWLRQRUGLVWDQFHUHTXLUHPHQWV HJQROHVVWKDQIHHWEHWZHHQ$'8V PD\
XQUHDVRQDEO\UHVWULFWWKHDELOLW\RIWKHKRPHRZQHUVWRFUHDWH$'8VFRQWUDU\WRWKHLQWHQWRI
WKH/HJLVODWXUH
' K&&/͘Z> z͕/WͮWZ/E/W>нWZ ^/ Ed
DͲ'ZKhWͮE t ^/'EKEhZEW>EE/E'
WK>/zͼ ^/'Eͼ Es/ZKED Ed>ͼ,/^dKZ/ͼ E'' D Edͼ^d&&/E'
DW >>ͮ^EdZK^ͮEWͮ,ztZ
ϯϬϳKƌĐŚĂƌĚŝƚLJƌŝǀĞ͕^ƵŝƚĞϭϬϬͮĂŵƉďĞůůͮͮϵϱϬϬϴͮϰϬϴ͘ϯϰϬ͘ϱϲϰϮyϭϬϮ
&ƌŽŵ͗ĂŶŝĞů&ĂŵĂфĚĂŶŝĞůĨΛĐŝƚLJŽĨĐĂŵƉďĞůů͘ĐŽŵх
^ĞŶƚ͗tĞĚŶĞƐĚĂLJ͕:ĂŶƵĂƌLJϮϰ͕ϮϬϭϴϵ͗Ϭϯ͗ϬϰD
dŽ͗'ĞŽĨĨƌĂĚůĞLJ
^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗Z ͗ĐĐĞƐƐŽƌLJǁĞůůŝŶŐhŶŝƚ;hͿKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞhƉĚĂƚĞͲ/ŶƚĞƌĞƐƚ>ŝƐƚ
,ŝ'ĞŽĨĨʹƌĞĚƵĐƚŝŽŶƚŽůŽƚƐŝnjĞŝƐŶŽƚĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJƉĂƌƚŽĨƚŚĞƵƉĚĂƚĞ͘,ŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ďĂƐĞĚŽŶ
ƚŚĞƉƵďůŝĐŝŶƚĞƌĞƐƚ͕ŝƚ͛ůůƵŶĚŽƵďƚĞĚůLJďĞĚŝƐĐƵƐƐĞĚĂƚƚŚĞŵĞĞƚŝŶŐ͘
)URP *HRII%UDGOH\>PDLOWR *%UDGOH\#PJURXSXV@
6HQW )ULGD\-DQXDU\ 30
7R 'DQLHO)DPD6XEMHFW 5H $FFHVVRU\'ZHOOLQJ8QLW $'8 2UGLQDQFH8SGDWH,QWHUHVW/LVW
ŚŝĚĂŶŝĞůͲͲƚŚĂŶŬƐĨŽƌŬĞĞƉŝŶŐŵĞŝŶƚŚĞůŽŽƉŽŶƚŚŝƐ͘/ƐƚŚĞĐŝƚLJŵŽǀŝŶŐƚŽǁĂƌĚƐĚŽŝŶŐ
ĂǁĂLJǁŝƚŚƚŚĞŵŝŶŝŵƵŵůŽƚƐŝnjĞƌĞƋƵŝƌĞŵĞŶƚĨŽƌhƐ͍dŚŝƐĚŝĚƐĞĞŵĞdžƉůŝĐŝƚŝŶƚŚĞƐƚĂƚĞ
ůĂǁƐďƵƚ/ŬŶŽǁƐŽŵĞĐŝƚŝĞƐƐƚŝůůŚĂǀĞŝƚ͘͘͘
17.d
Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
)URP -RVK5R]D
7R 'RQN\+RRW\
&F 6KLUOH\&KDQ 'DQLHO)DPD ODUU\#DFWLYHRYHUFRP HPP#\DKRRFRP PMWRZQ]HQ#DROFRP *%UDGOH\#PJURXSXV LQIR#VWDFFQDRUJ DNH\VHU#JPDLOFRP YLQFH#VFFDRUFRP QHLQDYD\#JPDLOFRP VOI#VWURPERWQHODZFRP GDQJRXZ#PVQFRP YRRGXH#KRWPDLOFRP FVHUULQ#\DKRRFRP 5-PDVLHOOR#VEFJOREDOQHW IUHGZHEHU#JPDLOFRP
6XEMHFW 5H $FFHVVRU\'ZHOOLQJ8QLW $'8 2UGLQDQFH8SGDWH,QWHUHVW/LVW
'DWH 0RQGD\)HEUXDU\ $0
$WWDFKPHQWV LPDJHSQJLPDJHSQJ
,GRQ
WNQRZLI$GXVDUHWKHDQVZHUWRWKHKRXVLQJFULVLVIRUVRPHRIWKHUHDVRQVVWDWHGDWWKHPHHWLQJ 7KHQXPEHURISURSHUWLHVWKDWZRXOGTXDOLI\LVVRPLQLPDOHYHQLIHYHU\ORWVL]HOLVWHGDWWKHPHHWLQJTXDOLILHVDQGEXLOWWKHUHZRXOGRQO\EHDIHZWKRXVDQGPRUHXQLWV
7KHUHDUHRWKHULVVXHVZLWKWKHEXLOGLQJFRGHVWKDWZLOOGLVTXDOLI\PRUHORWVOLNH\RXDUHDOORZHGGZHOOLQJDFFHVVRU\VWUXFWXUHXSWRVTIWDQGWKHQDQ\RWKHUVWUXFWXUHFDQQRWH[FHHGVTIWWKLVPHDQVWKDWLI\RXKDYHDKRXVHDQGDGHWDFKHGJDUDJH\RXDUHQRWDOORZHGDQRWKHUVWUXFWXUHRYHUVTIWPDNLQJLWHYHQKDUGHUWREXLOGDQDGXLI\RX&DQ
WEXLOGDVHFRQGVWRU\RQ\RXUJDUDJH
,DPKHDUWHQHGWRKHDUWKDWWKHUHLVDUHTXHVWIURPWKHFRPPLVVLRQHUVWRORRNDWDOORZLQJDVHFRQGIORRUDERYHDGHWDFKHG JDUDJH
7KHPRVWLPSRUWDQWWKLQJ,OHDUQHGLVWKDW\RXQHHGWRSD\DWWHQWLRQWRWKHWLPHFORFNDVZHZHUHJUDQWHGPLQXWHVDQGWKHFORFNRQO\JUDQWHGPLQXWHV7KHVHFRQGWKLQJLVWKDWDQ\PHPEHURIWKHFRPPXQLW\PD\DGGUHVVWKHFRPPLVVLRQRQDQ\LWHP127RQWKHDJHQGDIRUXSWRPLQXWHV7KLVPHDQVZHFDQVKRZXSHYHU\ZHHNVDQGSUHVVRXUSRLQWPLQXWHVSHUVSHDNHU
-RVK
2Q)HE 'RQN\+RRW\ P\LQER[#JPDLOFRP!ZURWH +L'DQLHO
,ZRXOGSURSRVHZHUHGXFHWKHFRPSOH[LW\RIWKHWDEOH :KLOH,DPLQIDYRURIQRPLQLPXPORWVL]HUHTXLUHPHQWVDQRWKHUSURSRVDOFRXOGEHWKHIROORZLQJ /RW6L]H0D[$'8 VTIW VTIW! VTIW
,ZRXOGDOVRGLVFRXUDJHGHHGUHVWULFWLRQVDVGLVFXVVHGLQWKHSODQQLQJPHHWLQJ 7KHUHDUHHQRXJKUHJXODWLRQVDQGLIDIIRUGDEOHKRXVLQJLVDQREMHFWLYHVHHKRZ$'8KDYHDIIHFWHG3RUWODQG KWWSV ZZZQSURUJ JUDQQ\SRGVKHOSNHHSSRUWODQGDIIRUGDEOH
,ZRXOGDOVRSURSRVHWRUHGXFHSHUPLWDQGRWKHUIHHVIRU$'8WRHQFRXUDJHSHRSOHWREXLOG$'8
%HVW5HJDUGV0\
2Q:HG)HEDW 306KLUOH\&KDQ VKLUOH\FKDQ#JPDLOFRP!ZURWH 'DQLHO7KDQN\RXIRUNHHSLQJXVXSWRGDWHDQGSRVWHGRQWKLVWRSLF $VIRONVLQDWWHQGDQFHLQ\HVWHUGD\
VPHHWLQJLVDZDUHWKLVLVDSDVVLRQDWHLVVXHWRPDQ\
+HUHDUHP\SURSRVDOV
5HGXFHPLQLPXPORWVL]HUHTXLUHPHQW &KDQJHLVUHIOHFWHGLQ<(//2:7KLVLVUHDOO\DUXGLPHQWDU\
FKDQJHLQRWKHUZRUGVWKLVVXJJHVWLRQLVEDVLFDOO\VODSSLQJRQWZRQHZDGGLWLRQVWRORWVL]HUHTXLUHPHQWV
0LQLPXP1HW/RW$UHD 0D[LPXP
)ORRUVSDFHRU
/LYLQJ$UHD
VTIW
VTIW
² VTIW VTIW
17.d
Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
)URP /DUU\+D\HV
7R 'DQLHO)DPD VKLUOH\FKDQ#JPDLOFRP
&F P\LQER[#JPDLOFRP HPP#\DKRRFRP PMWRZQ]HQ#DROFRP *%UDGOH\#PJURXSXV LQIR#VWDFFQDRUJ DNH\VHU#JPDLOFRP YLQFH#VFFDRUFRP MRVKUR]D#JPDLOFRP QHLQDYD\#JPDLOFRP VOI#VWURPERWQHODZFRP GDQJRXZ#PVQFRP YRRGXH#KRWPDLOFRP FVHUULQ#\DKRRFRP 5-PDVLHOOR#VEFJOREDOQHW IUHGZHEHU#JPDLOFRP
6XEMHFW 5H $FFHVVRU\'ZHOOLQJ8QLW $'8 2UGLQDQFH8SGDWH,QWHUHVW/LVW
'DWH :HGQHVGD\)HEUXDU\ 30
$WWDFKPHQWV LPDJHSQJLPDJHSQJ&'( ($'&'' >@SQJ
+L'DQLHO
$OORZLQJ$'8¶VWREHEXLOWLQ&DPSEHOORQVPDOOHUORWV LVDQLPSRUWDQWSLHFHRIWKHKRXVLQJ
SX]]OH7KHKRXVLQJFULVLVLVUHDODQGJHWWLQJZRUVH
7RUHFDSP\WDONODVWQLJKW
5HGXFHWKHPLQLPXPVL]HORWUHTXLUHGLQ&DPSEHOOIURPVTIWWRRUVPDOOHU
&XWWKHUHGWDSHDQGKLJKIHHVDVVRFLDWHGZLWK$'8SHUPLWV
6LPSOLI\DQGH[SHGLWHWKHDSSURYDOSURFHVV
0\ZLIHDQG,²ERWKLQRXUV²KDYHOLYHGLQ&DPSEHOODVKRPHRZQHUVIRURYHU\HDUV /LNHPRVWROGHU
DGXOWVZHPD\KDYHWR
GRZQVL]HDWVRPHSRLQW%XLOGLQJDQGOLYLQJLQDVPDOOKRPHLQRXURZQEDFN\DUG²VTIW²ZRXOGDOORZ
IRUPXOWLJHQHUDWLRQDO
OLYLQJ:HLQWKHEDFN\DUGPDLQWDLQLQJRXULQGHSHQGHQFHDQGRXUNLGVWDNLQJRYHUWKHPDLQKRXVH
/RRNLQJIRUZDUGWRWKHQH[WVWHS
/DUU\ *ORULD+D\HV
/DUU\:+D\HV
&(23XEOLVKHU
/DUU\#$FWLYH2YHUFRP
KWWS ZZZ$FWLYH2YHUFRP
&ƌŽŵ͗^ŚŝƌůĞLJŚĂŶфƐŚŝƌůĞLJĐŚĂŶϰΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵх
ĂƚĞ͗tĞĚŶĞƐĚĂLJ͕&ĞďƌƵĂƌLJϭϰ͕ϮϬϭϴĂƚϭ͗ϭϯWD
dŽ͗ĂŶŝĞů&ĂŵĂфĚĂŶŝĞůĨΛĐŝƚLJŽĨĐĂŵƉďĞůů͘ĐŽŵх
Đ͗ΗŵLJŝŶďŽdžϱϬΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵΗфŵLJŝŶďŽdžϱϬΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵх͕>ĂƌƌLJ,ĂLJĞƐфůĂƌƌLJΛĂĐƚŝǀĞŽǀĞƌϱϬ͘ĐŽŵх͕
ΗĞŵŵϮϭΛLJĂŚŽŽ͘ĐŽŵΗфĞŵŵϮϭΛLJĂŚŽŽ͘ĐŽŵх͕ΗŵũƚŽǁŶnjĞŶΛĂŽů͘ĐŽŵΗфŵũƚŽǁŶnjĞŶΛĂŽů͘ĐŽŵх͕
Η'ƌĂĚůĞLJΛŵͲŐƌŽƵƉ͘ƵƐΗф'ƌĂĚůĞLJΛŵͲŐƌŽƵƉ͘ƵƐх͕ΗŝŶĨŽΛƐƚĂĐĐŶĂ͘ŽƌŐΗфŝŶĨŽΛƐƚĂĐĐŶĂ͘ŽƌŐх͕
ΗĂŬĞLJƐĞƌϮϬϬϬΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵΗфĂŬĞLJƐĞƌϮϬϬϬΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵх͕ΗǀŝŶĐĞΛƐĐĐĂŽƌ͘ĐŽŵΗфǀŝŶĐĞΛƐĐĐĂŽƌ͘ĐŽŵх͕
ΗũŽƐŚ͘ƌŽnjĂΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵΗфũŽƐŚ͘ƌŽnjĂΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵх͕ΗŶĞŝŶĂǀĂLJΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵΗфŶĞŝŶĂǀĂLJΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵх͕
ΗƐůĨϭΛƐƚƌŽŵďŽƚŶĞůĂǁ͘ĐŽŵΗфƐůĨϭΛƐƚƌŽŵďŽƚŶĞůĂǁ͘ĐŽŵх͕ΗĚĂŶŐŽƵǁΛŵƐŶ͘ĐŽŵΗфĚĂŶŐŽƵǁΛŵƐŶ͘ĐŽŵх͕
ΗǀŽŽĚƵĞϮΛŚŽƚŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵΗфǀŽŽĚƵĞϮΛŚŽƚŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵх͕ΗĐƐĞƌƌŝŶΛLJĂŚŽŽ͘ĐŽŵΗфĐƐĞƌƌŝŶΛLJĂŚŽŽ͘ĐŽŵх͕
ΗZ:ŵĂƐŝĞůůŽΛƐďĐŐůŽďĂů͘ŶĞƚΗфZ:ŵĂƐŝĞůůŽΛƐďĐŐůŽďĂů͘ŶĞƚх͕ΗĨƌĞĚ͘ǁĞďĞƌΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵΗ
фĨƌĞĚ͘ǁĞďĞƌΛŐŵĂŝů͘ĐŽŵх
^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗ZĞ͗ĐĐĞƐƐŽƌLJǁĞůůŝŶŐhŶŝƚ;hͿKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞhƉĚĂƚĞͲ/ŶƚĞƌĞƐƚ>ŝƐƚ
17.d
Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
From:DonkyHooty
To:Shirley Chan
Cc:Daniel Fama; larry@activeover50.com; emm21@yahoo.com; mjtownzen@aol.com; GBradley@m-group.us; info@staccna.org;akeyser2000@gmail.com; vince@sccaor.com; josh.roza@gmail.com; neinavay@gmail.com; slf1@strombotnelaw.com;
dangouw@msn.com; voodue2@hotmail.com; cserrin@yahoo.com; RJmasiello@sbcglobal.net; fred.weber@gmail.com
Subject:Re: Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Ordinance Update - Interest List
Date:Friday, February 16, 2018 2:01:31 PM
Attachments:image005.pngimage002.png
Hi, Daniel,
I would propose we reduce the complexity of the table. While I am in favor of no minimum lot sizerequirements, another proposal could be the following:Lot Size, Max ADU5000-7999, 500 sqft8000-10,999, 800 sqft>10,999, 1200 sqft
I would also discourage deed restrictions as discussed in the planning meeting. There are enoughregulations and if affordable housing is an objective, see how ADU have affected Portland(https://www.npr.org/2017/08/15/543481719/-granny-pods-help-keep-portland-affordable)
I would also propose to reduce permit and other fees for ADU to encourage people to build ADU.
Best Regards,My
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 1:13 PM, Shirley Chan <shirleychan4@gmail.com> wrote:Daniel,Thank you for keeping us up-to-date and posted on this topic. As folks in attendance inyesterday's meeting is aware, this is a passionate issue - to many.
Here are my proposals:
1. Reduce minimum lot size requirement. Change is reflected in YELLOW.This is really a rudimentary
change - in other words, this suggestion is basically slapping on two new additions to lot size requirements.
2. Allow second story ADU, Main structure maximum height: 35 ft./2 ½ stories ...same as a single family home.
3. What other cities have done:
City of San Jose adjusted their ADU requirement - Instead of requiring 6,000 to 8,000 square feet
of land for granny units, homeowners only need 5,445 square feet.
City of Mountain view and Santa Clara has changed there lot size requirement to: NO MINIMUM.
Minimum Net Lot Area Maximum
Floorspace or
Living Area
8,000-8,999 500 sq ft
9,000-9,999 600 sq. ft
10,000—10,999 sq. ft. 700 sq. ft.
11,000—11,999 sq. ft. 800 sq. ft.
12,000—12,999 sq. ft. 900 sq. ft.
13,000—13,999 sq. ft. 1,000 sq. ft.
14,000—14,999 sq. ft. 1,100 sq. ft.
15,000 sq. ft. or greater 1,200 sq. ft.
17.d
Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
City of Palo Alto has changed their lot size requirements to be 5,000 sq ft.
City of Redwood City lot size requirement is: NO MINIMUM.
4. This is a great article about how cities can make ADU's a success:
https://www.citylab.com/design/2017/11/how-cities-get-granny-flats-wrong/546392/
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 11:09 AM, Daniel Fama <danielf@cityofcampbell.com> wrote:
Good Morning – As some of you may know, the Planning Commission took action to continuelast night’s public hearing to a future date. This means that the tentative March 20th CityCouncil hearing will not occur.
The Commission asked staff to research the ADU/housing policies of other Santa Clara Countycities and to provide options and analysis for reducing the minimum lot area, allowing ADUs insecond-stories, and possible incentives. This work will take some time, so it is likely to be atleast a couple of months before we schedule a follow-up meeting with the PlanningCommission.
If you have any ideas that you would like to share, please email or call. Otherwise, I will be intouch once we are ready to schedule another Planning Commission hearing.
Daniel
From: Daniel Fama
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2018 3:59 PM
Subject: RE: Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Ordinance Update - Interest List
Good Afternoon – The Planning Commission agenda has now been posted to the website (seelink below). The ADU Ordinance update is agendized as Item 1, meaning that it will be heardpromptly at 7:30 PM. If you have any questions, please feel free to call or email.
http://www.cityofcampbell.com/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Agenda/_02132018-1691
Daniel
Daniel Fama
17.d
Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
Senior Planner
City of Campbell | Community Development Department
70 N. First Street | Campbell, CA 95008
www.cityofcampbell.com | 408.866.2193
From: Daniel Fama Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 2:04 PM
Subject: RE: Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Ordinance Update - Interest List
Hello All – We will be scheduling a Planning Commission hearing for the updated ADU Ordinanceon February 13th (7:30 PM) with a City Council hearing tentatively scheduled for March20th. Your correspondence will be included in the staff reports provided to the Commission andCouncil. You may also attend the meetings and speak on the matter. The staff report and draftordinance will be published on the agenda web page by Thursday February 8th.
Thank you,
Daniel
From: Daniel Fama Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2018 11:27 AM
Cc: Daniel FamaSubject: RE: Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Ordinance Update - Interest List
Happy New Year All – Please be aware that the Planning Commission public hearing forconsideration of the updated ADU ordinance has been tentatively rescheduled for February13th pending clearance by the City Attorney’s Office.
Daniel
From: Daniel Fama Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 11:48 AMSubject: Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Ordinance Update - Interest List
Hello – The Campbell Planning Division is preparing an update to the City’s Accessory DwellingUnit Ordinance for consistency with recent State legislation (AB 494 and SB 229). The scope ofthe update includes revisions to parking requirements, allowable zoning districts, standards forconversions of accessory structures, and various definitional changes.
17.d
Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
We are preparing an email list to keep interested parties informed of upcoming public hearingson this matter. Your email has been added to this list due to a previous request or expressedinterest. If you would like to be removed from the interest list or are aware of other individualswho would like to be added, please let me know.
At current time, we are tentatively scheduling a January 23rd Planning Commission publichearing on the updated ADU ordinance. This date will be confirmed by the end of the year.
Thank you,
Daniel
Daniel Fama
Senior Planner
City of Campbell | Community Development Department
70 N. First Street | Campbell, CA 95008
www.cityofcampbell.com | 408.866.2193
17.d
Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
)URP 6KLUOH\&KDQ
7R 'DQLHO)DPD
&F P\LQER[#JPDLOFRP ODUU\#DFWLYHRYHUFRP HPP#\DKRRFRP PMWRZQ]HQ#DROFRP *%UDGOH\#PJURXSXV LQIR#VWDFFQDRUJ DNH\VHU#JPDLOFRP YLQFH#VFFDRUFRP MRVKUR]D#JPDLOFRP QHLQDYD\#JPDLOFRP VOI#VWURPERWQHODZFRP GDQJRXZ#PVQFRP YRRGXH#KRWPDLOFRP FVHUULQ#\DKRRFRP 5-PDVLHOOR#VEFJOREDOQHW IUHGZHEHU#JPDLOFRP
6XEMHFW 5H $FFHVVRU\'ZHOOLQJ8QLW $'8 2UGLQDQFH8SGDWH,QWHUHVW/LVW
'DWH :HGQHVGD\)HEUXDU\ 30
$WWDFKPHQWV LPDJHSQJLPDJHSQJ
'DQLHO7KDQN\RXIRUNHHSLQJXVXSWRGDWHDQGSRVWHGRQWKLVWRSLF $VIRONVLQDWWHQGDQFHLQ\HVWHUGD\
VPHHWLQJLVDZDUHWKLVLVDSDVVLRQDWHLVVXHWRPDQ\
+HUHDUHP\SURSRVDOV
5HGXFHPLQLPXPORWVL]HUHTXLUHPHQW &KDQJHLVUHIOHFWHGLQ<(//2:7KLVLVUHDOO\DUXGLPHQWDU\
FKDQJHLQRWKHUZRUGVWKLVVXJJHVWLRQLVEDVLFDOO\VODSSLQJRQWZRQHZDGGLWLRQVWRORWVL]HUHTXLUHPHQWV
$OORZVHFRQGVWRU\$'8 0DLQVWUXFWXUHPD[LPXPKHLJKW IWòVWRULHV VDPHDVDVLQJOHIDPLO\KRPH
:KDWRWKHUFLWLHVKDYHGRQH
&LW\RI6DQ-RVHDGMXVWHGWKHLU$'8UHTXLUHPHQW,QVWHDGRIUHTXLULQJWRVTXDUHIHHW
RIODQGIRUJUDQQ\XQLWVKRPHRZQHUVRQO\QHHGVTXDUHIHHW
&LW\RI0RXQWDLQYLHZDQG6DQWD&ODUDKDVFKDQJHGWKHUHORWVL]HUHTXLUHPHQWWR 120,1,080
&LW\RI3DOR$OWRKDVFKDQJHGWKHLUORWVL]HUHTXLUHPHQWVWREHVTIW
&LW\RI5HGZRRG&LW\ORWVL]HUHTXLUHPHQWLV 120,1,080
7KLVLVDJUHDWDUWLFOHDERXWKRZFLWLHVFDQPDNH$'8
VDVXFFHVV
KWWSV ZZZFLW\ODEFRPGHVLJQKRZFLWLHVJHWJUDQQ\IODWVZURQJ
2Q:HG)HEDW $0'DQLHO)DPD GDQLHOI#FLW\RIFDPSEHOOFRP!ZURWH
*RRG0RUQLQJ±$VVRPHRI\RXPD\NQRZWKH3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQWRRNDFWLRQWRFRQWLQXHODVWQLJKW¶VSXEOLFKHDULQJWRDIXWXUHGDWH7KLVPHDQVWKDWWKHWHQWDWLYH0DUFKWK&LW\&RXQFLOKHDULQJZLOOQRWRFFXU
0LQLPXP1HW/RW$UHD 0D[LPXP
)ORRUVSDFHRU
/LYLQJ$UHD
VTIW
VTIW
² VTIW VTIW
² VTIW VTIW
² VTIW VTIW
² VTIW VTIW
² VTIW VTIW
VTIWRUJUHDWHU VTIW
17.d
Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
)URP (PHUVRQ0X\FR
7R 'DQLHO)DPD
6XEMHFW 5H 5( $FFHVVRU\'ZHOOLQJ8QLW $'8 2UGLQDQFH8SGDWH,QWHUHVW/LVW
'DWH 7KXUVGD\)HEUXDU\ $0
$WWDFKPHQWV LQODZXQLWSDJHV
+HOOR'DQLHO :ULWWHQEHORZDQGDWWDFKHG WKDQN\RX (P
'HDU&LW\&RXQFLOPDQ
$VDOONQRZWKHUHLVDKRXVLQJFULVLVLQWKH%D\$UHDDQGWKHFLW\RI&DPSEHOOLVQR
H[FHSWLRQ ,¶PZULWLQJWKLVOHWWHULQKRSHVWRFKDQJHWKHFXUUHQW3DUNLQJUHTXLUHPHQWVIRUP\
H[LVWLQJKRXVH /RYHOO$YHQXH VRWKDW,FDQEXLOGDQ,Q/DZKRXVHLQWKHEDFN
RIP\KRXVHIRUP\PRWKHUWROLYHLQVLQFHEHFRPLQJLOO 0\KRXVHKDV ³ODFNRIFRGH
FRPSODLQWSDUNLQJIRUWKHH[LVWLQJKRXVH LHWKHXQFRYHUHGSDUNLQJVSDFHLVQRWZLWKLQWKH
UHTXLUHGIURQWVHWEDFN ´
&XUUHQWO\P\GULYHZD\LVORQJHQRXJKWRDFFRPPRGDWHFDUV +RZHYHULW¶VQRWHQRXJK
EHFDXVH ,RQO\KDYHDRQHFDUJDUDJH DQG WKH GULYHZD\ SDUNLQJLVZLWKLQWKHIURQWVHWEDFN
7KLVZRXOGPHDQWKDW,ZRXOGUHDOO\QHHGD IHHWGULYHZD\ RUDWZRFDUJDUDJH WR VDWLVI\
WKHUHTXLUHG SDUNLQJ ,I\RXORRNDWDOOWKHKRXVHVRQP\QHLJKERUKRRGPRVWKDYHVLQJOHFDU
JDUDJHVDQGQRQHKDYHWKDW IHHWGULYHZD\OHQJWKQHHGHGWREHFRPSOLDQW ,KDYHGLVFXVVHG
WKLVZLWKWKHVHQLRUSODQQHU'DQLHO)DPD ,ZRXOGOLNHWRUHTXHVWWRFKDQJHWKLVUHTXLUHPHQW
VRWKDW,FDQEXLOGDDFFHVVRU\GZHOOLQJLQWKHEDFNIRUP\PRWKHU
7KDQN\RXIRU\RXFRQVLGHUDWLRQV
(PHUVRQ0X\FR
/RYHOO$YHQXH
&DPSEHOO&D
2Q:HGQHVGD\-DQXDU\ $0367'DQLHO)DPD GDQLHOI#FLW\RIFDPSEHOOFRP!
ZURWH
+L(P±&DQ\RXVHQGD³FOHDQ´HPDLOZLWKRXWWKHXQGHUOLQHV"
)URP (PHUVRQ0X\FR>PDLOWR HPP#\DKRRFRP@
6HQW )ULGD\-DQXDU\ $0
7R 'DQLHO)DPD
&F (PHUVRQ0X\FR
6XEMHFW 5H $FFHVVRU\'ZHOOLQJ8QLW $'8 2UGLQDQFH8SGDWH,QWHUHVW/LVW
+HOOR'DQLHO $WWDFKHGLVWKHUHYLVHGYHUVLRQSHU\RXUFRUUHFWLRQV /HWPHNQRZLIXZDQWPHWR
UHYLVHDVQHHGHG 7K[ 5HSO\EDFN (P
17.d
Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
To Campbell Planning Commission:
My name is Loren Due and I reside at 612 North Central Ave. I am writing today to
discuss the recent changes for secondary units. I have been trying to add a
secondary unit onto my property unsuccessfully because of the 10,000 sq ft lot
requirement. My lot is 8,358 and I feel it is of adequate size to support a secondary
unit.
The main issue I am facing is I would like to convert my garage to a secondary unit
and add a detached garage in my rear setback. My side yard is currently paved but
only has a width of 12 feet. If I added a garage in the rear setback I would not meet
the 13 feet minimum for a driveway.
I feel the City of Campbell is not being fair with the intent of the new California
Secondary Unit law. The intent of the law is to allow homeowners to build
secondary units and the City of Campbell is making it impossible for medium sized
homes. I ask that you consider reducing the size to 8,000 and/or ease the restriction
of the driveways to allow people to build detached garages. If my lot was 10,000 sq
ft then I would be allowed to have a driveway under 13 feet in width and a
secondary unit. I find this unfair and do not understand why a lot bigger than mine
is allowed special privileges.
If I am not allowed to build a secondary unit then I would like to legally convert my
garage to habitual space and provide the necessary covered parking in the rear of
the property. There are several homes on my street with driveway less than 13 feet
with detached garages in the rear setbacks. I would like to have that privilege also.
I thank you for your time and look forward to discussing this issue with you in
person or via phone.
Loren Due
612 North Central Ave
408.421.7044
17.d
Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
From:Larry Hayes
To:Daniel Fama
Subject:Campbell ADUs
Date:Thursday, November 02, 2017 2:33:05 PM
Importance:High
Hi Daniel:
I’m a long time Campbell resident and very interested in building an
ADU in my backyard. Unfortunately, Campbell’s current housing
regulations require a 10,000 sq ft lot which I don’t have.
Please let me know when ADUs come up again on the city council agenda as I
would like to address this issue. Many cities are reducing lot size, cutting
red tape and costs to encourage more ADUs to be built. For example,
Sunnyvale recently reduced their minimum lot size to 8,000 vs. 10,000.
San Jose and Palo Alto have done the same.
Regards,
Larry Hayes
1172 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd,
Campbell
17.d
Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
From:Squarespace
To:Planning Division
Subject:Form Submission - New Form - ADU to be included as next topic in GPAC meeting.
Date:Monday, August 14, 2017 9:23:51 PM
Name:shirley chan
Email Address:shirleychan4@gmail.com
Subject:ADU to be included as next topic in GPAC meeting.
Message:I'm reaching out to the City of Campbell Planning department to discussconsiderations to adjusting the current ADU minimum lot size requirement. While Iam happy to see the State of California has relaxed some laws in 2017 on buildingADU's as a way to increase affordable housing, I am disappointed the City ofCampbell did not reduce the lot size requirements. Current code indicates minimumlot size to be 10,000 sq ft.
ASK: how can I have the city council and/or planning department to consider areduction in the lot size requirements of ADU's? Could this be part of theconsideration as the city is going through Envision Campbell General Plan Updateprocess? Can this be included in one of the agenda items for the next GPACmeeting?
A recent Mercury news article discusses some of the reason and rationale to easingrules to build granny units as a source of affordable housing.
Here are some findings by the city of Palo Alto on ADU's:Housing in California is becoming increasingly unaffordable. The average Californiahome currently costs about 2.5 times the national average home price and themonthly rent is 50% higher than the rest of the nation. Rent in San Francisco, SanJose, Oakland, and Los Angeles are among the top 10 most unaffordable in thenation. With rising population growth, California must not only provide housing butalso ensure affordability. It is estimated that 63 percent of extremely low income renter households and 75percent of extremely low income owner households overpaid for housing in 2010. Ofthe estimated 1,520 low income households, 75 percent of renter households and 44percent of homeowner households paid more than 30 percent of their income forhousing.The Palo Alto City Council, recognizing the severity of the regional housing crisis,requested that the Planning and Transportation Commission review constraintsaffecting the production of second (accessory) dwelling units and recommendmodifications to the City development standards.While existing law enables accessory dwellings as a source of housing, recent studiesshow that local standards like P unintentionally, prevent homeowners frombuildingADUs with standards like lot coverage, large setbacks, offstreet parking, or costlyconstruction requirements.
What other cities have done (just to name a few):City of San Jose adjusted their ADU requirement - Instead of requiring 6,000 to8,000 square feet of land for granny units, homeowners only need 5,445 squarefeet.
17.d
Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
City of Mountain view has changed there lot size requirement to: NO MINIMUM.City of Palo Alto has changed their lot size requirements to be 5,000 sq ft.City of Redwood City lot size requirement is: NO MINIMUM.
(Sent via Envision Campbell)
17.d
Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
From:Mary Jo Townzen
To:Daniel Fama
Subject:Lot Size Requirement for Granny Unit
Date:Wednesday, October 25, 2017 11:43:21 AM
Hi Daniel,
Thank you for your time over the phone yesterday. My husband and I own and reside at 752 Craig
Avenue in Campbell. Our lot is a corner lot that is over 9,000 square feet.
We are interested in adding a granny unit and want to be kept in the loop as to the City Council's
consideration of reducing the lot size requirement from 10,000 square feet.
Please keep us on the interest list and let us know how and when we can participate in any
proceedings where this is being considered. Thank you for all your assistance.
Sincerely,
Mary Jo Townzen
Mobile: 408-386-5761
17.d
Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
%" 0 ,
(,! !<.;9:A
:B>> ' &1
# .B>99A
" (! ',) "# !' %'"%
" (! ',) "# !'#%' !'
'," #
@9
1 %&''%'
# .B>99A
=9A1A??1;:=9
% %1
",!.
*"( '"%$(&'' ',"(%# !! !#%' !'"!& %&%"## !' ! ( "'& -
%$( % !'&"%&&"%,* !! '&56%" ' (%%!':9.999&$' '1 ' '
!* *&&' & &',%. !, ' & )%("% !'' %$( % !'&&
"(' ! !' ' "*'" "*"% "% "(& !1 )&#" !#%) "(& ,'' ',
"(! ' ! !.;9:@"('' & &&(!*"( '"'' & &&(%&& !"%
' :<' ' !1 ,)"'*"( "% # '" )&" ' !& %'"(#%' !"
"%' &'%('" ! ( "'& -%$( % !'&'">9991
', ! ( - %!!,! ' - " !'&
! "& >=>> =99&$' 4DB.999& "'3?99&4B.99:'":9.999 "'3?>9&4C
:9.999 "'3A99&
!' % ?999 :;99&$'
"&'"& =9.999 :999&$' &!"' !1
(#%' !"
" ! ( A992:;99&$' !%:9.999&$'2 + &A99&$'/)%:9.999&$'2
+ &:;99&$'
"(!' !
*
" ! ( @99&$'
(!!,) A>99 " !'"@999* ' (%%!'#%"#"& & !29/A999&$'
* ' 2:
" '" >999 =>92B99&$'
,
(,!
17.d
Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
)URP /DUU\+D\HV
7R 'DQLHO)DPD
&F *ORULD+D\HV
6XEMHFW 5H $FFHVVRU\'ZHOOLQJ8QLW $'8 2UGLQDQFH8SGDWH,QWHUHVW/LVW
'DWH :HGQHVGD\'HFHPEHU 30
$WWDFKPHQWV LPDJHSQJ
LPDJHSQJ
$2B6XPPHUB<HVLQP\EDFN\DUGSGI
,PSRUWDQFH +LJK
+L'DQLHO
$W\RXUQH[W3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQPHHWLQJUHJDUGLQJ$'8V,VWURQJO\XUJH
FKDQJLQJWKHFXUUHQWPLPLPXPVL]HORWRIVTIWWRRUOHVV
0DQ\FLWLHVLQFOXGLQJ6DQ-RVH6XQQ\YDOHDQG3DOR$OWRKDYHUHFHQWO\UHGXFHGWKHLU
PLQLPXPVL]HORWUHTXLUHPHQWWRDOORZPRUH$'8VWREHEXLOWLQDQHIIRUWWRKHOSVROYHWKH
KRXVLQJFULVLVLQWKH%D\$UHD
$&DPSEHOOUHVLGHQWIRURYHU\HDUV²P\ZLIHDQG,RZQDKRXVHLQ&DPSEHOOZLWK
DVIIWORWLGHDOO\VXLWHGIRUDVPDOOEDFN\DUGKRPHIURPWRVTIW:H
ZRXOGOLNHWRKDYHWKHRSWLRQRIEXLOGLQJDVPDOO$'8LQRXUEDFN\DUGZKLFKZRXOG
VHUYHDVDIXWXUHSODFHIRUXVWROLYHZKHQZH¶UHQRORQJHUDEOHWROLYHLQRXUFXUUHQW
KRPH
2IFRXUVHWKLVDORQHGRHVQ¶WVROYHWKHKRXVLQJFULVLVLQ&DPSEHOOEXWLQDVPDOOZD\LWKHOSV
UHWLUHHVOLNHP\VHOIDQGRWKHUVWRUHPDLQOLYLQJLQRXUEHORYHGQHLJKERUKRRGVDVORQJDV
SRVVLEOH
5HJDUGV
/DUU\ *ORULD+D\HV
6DQ7RPDV$TXLQR5G
&DPSEHOO
36$WWDFKHGLV'HFHPEHUSKRWRWDNHQRIDKRPHOHVVIDPLO\OLYLQJLQDSDUNHGFDU
RQ+DFLHQGD$YHQH[WWR.DLVHUPHGLFDO$WOHDVW59VDUHSDUNHGRQ'HOO$YH
GXHWRWKHKRPHOHVVQHVVSUREOHP,¶PVXUHWKLVLVQRWWKHRQO\SODFHLQ&DPSEHOO
ZLWKSHRSOHOLYLQJRQWKHVWUHHW
$OVRDWWDFKHGLVDQDUWLFOHDERXW$'8VWKDWDSSHDUHGUHFHQWO\LQWKH6DQ-RVH0HUFXU\1HZV
DQG$FWLYH2YHU
&ƌŽŵ͗ĂŶŝĞů&ĂŵĂфĚĂŶŝĞůĨΛĐŝƚLJŽĨĐĂŵƉďĞůů͘ĐŽŵх
ĂƚĞ͗dƵĞƐĚĂLJ͕ĞĐĞŵďĞƌϱ͕ϮϬϭϳĂƚϰ͗ϭϬWD
dŽ͗>ĂƌƌLJ,ĂLJĞƐфůĂƌƌLJΛĂĐƚŝǀĞŽǀĞƌϱϬ͘ĐŽŵх
^ƵďũĞĐƚ͗Z ͗ĐĐĞƐƐŽƌLJǁĞůůŝŶŐhŶŝƚ;hͿKƌĚŝŶĂŶĐĞhƉĚĂƚĞͲ/ŶƚĞƌĞƐƚ>ŝƐƚ
zĞƐLJŽƵĐĂŶ͘'ĞŶĞƌĂůůLJƵƉƚŽϮͲϯŵŝŶƵƚĞƐ͘
)URP /DUU\+D\HV>PDLOWR ODUU\#DFWLYHRYHUFRP@
17.d
Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
17.d
Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
12 / ActiveOver50 / Summer 2017
Backyard Homes
“Yes. In My Backyard”
By Pat Kapowich
Twenty years ago, most Bay Area
homeowners were opposed to having
secondary housing units in their next
door neighbor's backyard. Similarly,
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) have
swapped out "granny units" and
"in-law quarters."
Times change. Perhaps the housing
shortage and aging population are
ϐǤ
Regardless, according to The California
Department of Housing and Community
Development, "changes to ADU laws
(SB 1069, AB 2299 and AB 2406) will
further reduce barriers, better
streamline approval and expand
capacity to accommodate the develop-
ment of ADUs."
The term “housing crisis” is now
synonymous with the housing shortage.
Young, old, rich or poor have all seen
Bay Area rents skyrocket as supply
plummets. The new laws deliberately
eased parking and requirements
which will no doubt result in added
housing stock for renters and rental
income ADU owners.
As a Realtor®, I know this is another
option for many older adults who are
traditionally unable or unwilling to
sell and move. In fact, our Multiple
Listing Service will include a search
function for properties with an ADU.
Accessory Dwelling Units—a.k.a.
Secondary Dwelling Units or Accessory
Living Units—are attached or detached
new construction. Conversely, a
Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit,
(JADU) repurposes a room within
the existing footprint of the single-
family residence.
JADUs have a separate entrance
but no gas or 220-volt appliances
and can be no more than 500 square
feet. Two double locking doors are
required to connect the unit to
the primary residence. The JADU
ϐ
a bathroom is optional.
Senior citizens now referred to as
"older adults" can maximize the
newer term "aging in place." The ADU
can accommodate guests, renters,
family members or caregivers. Lest
we forget, the homeowner has the
option to live in the ADU while
collecting rent on the larger home.
Regardless, rental income in the
backyards of retirees or a growing
family is a safe investment. Thankfully,
major banks are working on an
Ǧ ϐ
allow the future rents as a factor
for qualifying.
How much? You might ask. One
newspaper article stated, "a rock-
bottom new one can cost $50,000 to
construct." We’re not talking sheds.
Another reported $200,000 on the
high end to complete. Reports also
indicate speeding up the process with
dramatic decreases in fee and costs.
After interviews with the Garrison
brothers of MC Contractors & Engi-
neering, I thought it would be prudent
to get real-world advice.
Owner Mark Garrison currently
has 20 permits open at different
building departments from San
Francisco to Gilroy. They also recently
built a detached ADU in Los Gatos for
$335,000. The permits were over
15% of the cost.
Still a bargain today when 44-year
old, 4-plexes sharing a laundry room,
converted into condos, sell for
$550,000+ accompanied by a $300+
monthly HOA fee.
Housing Guide 17.d
Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)
ActiveOver50 / Summer 2017 / 13
ϐ
concerns. Adding an ADU could
trigger upgrading the existing home's
old and undersized water, gas and
sewer lines.
“One can easily spend $75,000
in utility upgrades," he said. Utility
companies bring their respective lines
from the street to the single-family
home. The contractor will then bring
those lines to the ADU. Mark recalled
an attached non-permitted ADU that
ϐ
both dwellings.
The cost could reach $30,000 in
plumbing, labor, fees and permits.
Fire sprinklers are not mandated in
ADUs if the existing house did not
require them when built. However,
ϐ
ϐǤ
Mark's brother, Tim and author
of Structural Concepts For the
Non-Engineer, shared how many
professionals could be hired for
the process of building an ADU.
"The primary disciplines typically
required are an architect, surveyor,
civil engineer, planner, structural
engineer and builder. There are
secondary disciplines which may
or may not be involved such as
landscape architect and interior
designer. Trade contractors usually
handle disciplines such as electrical
engineering and mechanical engi-
neering.
“If this site is steeply sloping,
seismically active or has some other
geological issue, you’ll likely need a
geotechnical engineer,” Tim added.
"If everything goes perfectly, six
months minimum. If there are
glitches—there’s no upper limit.
Realistically I’d estimate a year."
No matter—the “win-win” invest-
ment and security of an ADU or JADU
may well be worth the cost and wait.
Realtor® Pat Kapowich provides old-
fashion service within a high-tech
world. Pat writes the Market Wise
column for the San Jose Mercury
News and Bay Area News New Group.
He can be reached at 408. 245.7700
or Pat@SiliconValleyBroker.com.
SiliconValleyBroker.com.
17.d
Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Attachment 4 - Public Correspondence (1185 : ADU Update)