Loading...
City Council (2013-03-05)Downtown Mix of Uses City Council March 5, 2013 Purpose of Study Session “Why Are We Here” Observations reveal that the mix of uses in the downtown is favoring restaurants over traditional retail. The presentation will help form an understanding of how the community’s desires have shaped Downtown Campbell. A Study Session provides an opportunity to revisit the City’s Policies and Standards to determine if the “vision” of Downtown Campbell is being achieved. Staff’s Role To provide an explanation of how “General Plan Policies” and “Land Use Zoning” has influenced the mix of downtown uses. To explain where Campbell was and what it offers today. To discuss what options exist to further control uses should the City Council determine that the City’s vision is not being followed. To facilitate the discussion and answer questions. Evolution of the Downtown 1950’s –Variety of uses provided Evolution of the Downtown Post war era changed the purpose and function of U.S. downtowns. Campbell was equally affected. Evolution of the Downtown 1960’s –The City of Campbell recognized this phenomenon Studied alternatives. Evolution of the Downtown The “Draft” Development Plan provided a radical transformation of Downtown Campbell. Evolution of the Downtown In lieu of the 1960’s Plan, the City performed circulation and streetscape improvements. Evolution of the Downtown 1968, the Pruneyard Shopping Center opened. 1970’s to 80’s, Downtown Campbell was dominated by office uses. The Downtown became an 8:00 to 5:00 center. Evolution of the Downtown Late 80’s, the City adopted its first Downtown Development Plan. Evolution of the Downtown Goals of the Downtown Development Plan To reinforce the area east of Second Street as the downtown retail core area; To strengthen Campbell Avenue as the primary retail/pedestrian corridor; To encourage office and service commercial uses to locate outside the retail core area; To concentrate public and private parking areas at the periphery of the core, along the loop streets. Evolution of the Downtown Accomplishments included: $2.5 million in streetscape improvements were constructed. Campbell Avenue was returned to two-way traffic. The Ainsley House was relocated to the Downtown. Distinctive downtown signage was installed. Revisions to development standards were prepared to make downtown more business friendly. Evolution of the Downtown In 1995, the City reevaluated the Downtown Development Plan in order to “reassess the goals and vision” of the document. Proposed updates included: Remove plans to build a parking garage at the Campbell Museum site. Consider converting the loop streets from two-lanes to one-lane in order to build 150 new parking stalls. Encourage commercial frontage along the loop streets. Provide a storefront improvement program. Prepare an economic strategy to assist businesses to relocate to the downtown. Evolution of the Downtown The update was approved in 1996. Evolution of the Downtown In the early 2000’s, the City once again revisited the Plans progress. The 2006 Downtown Development Plan was amended and remains the current document used today. Status of the Downtown Today Downtown Campbell has become a successful and active part of the community. The policies and standards have contributed to this success. To what extent the policies and standards are in keeping with the overall vision is open to discussion. This “reassessment” process will be in keeping with past practices. Status of the Downtown Today Staff will now present observations of the current mix of uses and regulations that have influenced the mix. Staff will provide options that could further influence the desired mix of uses should the City Council believe the mix of uses should be further regulated. Land Use Policies General Plan Downtown Development Plan Policies, Strategies, and Goals Day and evening activities Services within walking distance Compatible mix of uses Variety of retail businesses Diversification of eating establishments Distinctive retail and restaurant experience Self sustaining commercial district Economically viable business district Redevelopment Plan Downtown (C-3) Zoning District Objectives Enhance Downtown… as a unique retail and business center. Reinforce Campbell Avenue as a pedestrian-oriented retail street. Promote ground-floor retail uses…and suitable mix of uses. Establish development intensities consistent with the…amount of parking. C-3 Zoning -Permitted Uses Retail StoresRestaurants Beer & Wine Service No Separate Bar Area Close by 11 PM Business License C-3 Zoning -Conditional Uses Stand Alone Bar Restaurants Hard Alcohol Service Separate Bar Area Close after 11 PM Wine Bar Downtown Alcohol Policy Conditional Use Permit Mix of Uses Ground Floor Tenant Space by Use 2007 to 2013 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2013 (Projected) YearPercentage of TotalRestaurant/Food Retail Office Service Bars/Clubs Vacant 2009 67,000 sq. ft. (31%) Current 86,000 sq. ft. (37%) Projected 92,000 sq. ft. (40%) Alcohol-Serving Establishments 10 Years 11 23 Establishments Restaurants Over Time2003 Restaurant Wine Bar Bar Restaurants Over Time Restaurant Wine Bar Bar 2004 Restaurants Over Time Restaurant Wine Bar Bar 2005 Restaurants Over Time Restaurant Wine Bar Bar 2006 Restaurants Over Time Restaurant Wine Bar Bar 2007 Restaurants Over Time Restaurant Wine Bar Bar 2008 Restaurants Over Time Restaurant Wine Bar Bar 2009 Restaurants Over Time Restaurant Wine Bar Bar 2010 Restaurants Over Time Restaurant Wine Bar Bar 2011 Restaurants Over Time Restaurant Wine Bar Bar 2012 Restaurants Over Time Restaurant Wine Bar Bar 2013 Trend Factors Parking Standards DT Alcohol Policy Parking In- Lieu Fee Increased Seating Increased Certainty Reduced Cost Eliminated Over- Concentration + Potential Effects Fewer Retail Opportunities More Restaurants Change Mix of Uses Evening-Oriented Downtown Long-Term Retail Displacement Consistency with Policies? Potential Effects Change Mix of Uses Increased Parking Demand Adequacy of Parking Supply? Alters Parking Study Assumptions 100,000 57,000 17,500 41,000 75,000 85,000 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 Projected CurrentSquare-FootageRetail Service Restaurant Potential Effects Change Mix of Uses Increased Sales Tax Revenue Value of Increased Revenue? Options Direct Limitations Maximum Number of Restaurants Maximum Square-Footage of Restaurants Prohibit New Restaurants Regulatory Approach Require a CUP for conversion to Restaurant Use Modify DT Alcohol Policy to address Over-Concentration Indirect Limitations Eliminate Parking Exception (reducing seating capacity) Reinstate Parking in-Lieu Fee Council Direction Is a restaurant-oriented Downtown consistent with City policies? Action to be taken, if any. Moratorium (Urgency Ordinance)? 4/5 Majority Vote Initial 45 Day Duration, up to 2 years