Council Report - 11-5-2019 - 499 E HamiltonCity
Council
Report
TITLE: Continued Public Hearing to Consider the Appeal of Nadia L. Costa
on Behalf of In-N-Burger for Consideration of a Conditional Use
Permit with Site and Architectural Review (PLN2017-117) to Allow
Construction of a 3,812 Square-Foot 97-Seat Fast-Food Restaurant
with a 28-Vehicle Double Drive-Through Lane with Outdoor Activities
(Drive-Up Window), a 48-Seat Outdoor Dining Area, Late-Night Hours,
and Associated Site, Lighting, Parking, Refuse Collection, and
Landscaping Improvements, Including a Minor Alteration to the
Hamilton Avenue Streetscape Standards and an Adjustment to the
Landscape Requirements, and an Increase to the Allowable Fence
Height; a Tree Removal Permit (PLN2017-118) to Allow Removal of
Protected On-Site Trees; a Sign Permit (PLN2017-119) to Allow a
Greater Number of Signs and an Increased Sign Area to Permit
Installation of New Directional, Informational/Menu, "Running Neon,"
and Building Wall Signs; and Certification of a Final Environmental
Impact Report (FEIR) (PLN2017-120), for Property Located at 499 E.
Hamilton Avenue in the C-2 (General Commercial) Zoning District.
(Resolutions/Roll Call Vote)
RECOMMENDED ACTION
That the City Council take the following actions: (1) adopt a resolution denying a
Conditional Use Permit with Site and Architectural Review (PLN2017-117) to allow
construction of a 3,812 square-foot drive-through fast-food restaurant; (2) adopt a
resolution denying a Tree Removal Permit to allow removal of on-site trees (PLN2017-
118); and (3) adopt a resolution denying a Sign Permit (PLN2017-119).
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the Proposed Project in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality (CEQA). However, absent an
affirmative decision on the Proposed Project, the EIR need not be certified since the
City Council’s action to deny is Statutorily Exempt pursuant to California Public
Resource Code Section 21080(b)(5).
DISCUSSION
Project Site: The subject property was the site of the former Elephant Bar restaurant
Item:8
Category:PUBLIC HEARINGS AND
INTRODUCTION OF
ORDINANCES
Meeting Date:November 5, 2019
8
Packet Pg. 106
PLN2017-117:120 ~ 499 E. Hamilton Avenue (In-N-Out Burger Appeal)Page 2 of 3
located at the northwest corner of East Hamilton Avenue and Almarida Drive.
City Council Hearing: At its meeting of October 15, 2019, the City Council considered a
development proposal to allow construction and operation of a 3,812 square-foot drive-
through In-N-Out Burger fast-food restaurant and certification of the associated
Environmental Impact Report (EIR). After taking public testimony, questioning the City’s
environmental consultant, and concluding its deliberations, the Council continued the
public hearing and directed staff to return with resolutions to deny the project.
Resolutions: Staff has prepared resolutions taking into account the Council comments
made during the public hearing and other supporting information found in the
administrative record. In summary, the resolutions establish that the City Council is
denying the project for the following reasons:
x A fast-food restaurant is a vehicle-oriented activity that would incur additional
traffic to an already failing intersection which would not serve the public interest.
x The property could support a higher and better use that could take advantage of
the transportation facilities in the area.
x A higher and better use would likely generate a greater number and variety of
jobs.
x A higher and better use would be more fiscally advantageous to the City.
x The project’s site circulation could create unforeseen vehicular conflicts on
Almarida Drive.
x The project’s internal configuration would impede the ability of motorist entering
from Almarida Drive from accessing the drive-through and could create impacts
for individuals with disabilities trying to maneuver around cars.
x The proposed late-night activities would result in land use incompatibilities.
x The lengthening of the Hamilton Avenue left-turn line, while feasible, would result
in the loss of City street trees within the existing median inconsistent with the
City’s tree preservation policies.
x The project would serve a significant number of motorists exiting Highway 17 to
quickly purchase food—thereby adding to the existing traffic issues—while
providing relatively minimal service to the residents of Campbell whose
neighborhoods would be impacted.
x The internal circulation will impede the ability access the refuse enclosure.
Prepared by:
8
Packet Pg. 107
'DQLHO)DPD6HQLRU3ODQQHU
PLN2017-117:120 ~ 499 E. Hamilton Avenue (In-N-Out Burger Appeal)Page 3 of 3
Reviewed by:
Paul Kermoyan, Community
Development Director
Approved by:
Brian Loventhal, City Manager
Attachment:
1. Draft CC Resol (CUP - Deny)
2. Draft CC Resol (Sign - Deny)
3. Draft CC Resol (TRP - Deny)
4. IN-N-OUT Letter to Campbell City Council
8
Packet Pg. 108
RESOLUTION NO. ____
BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CAMPBELL DENYING WITH PREJUDICE A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT WITH SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW (PLN2017-
117) TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 3,812 SQUARE-FOOT 97-
SEAT FAST-FOOD RESTAURANT WITH A 28-VEHICLE DOUBLE
DRIVE-THROUGH LANE WITH OUTDOOR ACTIVE ACTIVITIES
(DRIVE-UP WINDOW), A 48-SEAT OUTDOOR SEATING AREA,
LATE-NIGHT ACTIVITIES, AND ASSOCIATED SITE, LIGHTING,
PARKING, REFUSE COLLECTION, AND LANDSCAPING
IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING A MINOR ALTERATION TO THE
HAMILTON AVENUE STREETSCAPE STANDARDS AND AN
ADJUSTMENT TO THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, AND AN
INCREASE TO THE ALLOWABLE FENCE HEIGHT, FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 499 E. HAMILTON AVENUE.
FILE NO.: PLN2017-117
After notification and public hearing, as specified by law and after presentation by the
Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed.
The City Council finds as follows with regard to File Number PLN2017-117:
Environmental Finding
1. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the Proposed Project in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality (CEQA) and considered by the
Planning Commission and City Council. However, absent an affirmative decision on the
Proposed Project, the EIR need not be certified since the City Council’s action to deny
is Statutorily Exempt pursuant to California Public Resource Code Section 21080(b)(5).
Evidentiary Findings
1. The Project Site is a 1 ¼ acre parcel located at the northwest corner of East Hamilton
Avenue and Almarida Drive, approximately 350 feet west of the Southbound California
State Highway 17 off-ramp and ⅓ mile from the Valley Transportation Authority (VTA)
Hamilton Light Rail Station.
2. The Project Site abuts the Franciscan apartment community to the north and a retail
building to the west and is across the street from Bed, Bath, and Beyond to the east
across Almarida Drive and the Home Depot to the south across Hamilton Avenue.
3. The Project Site is currently entitled with a Conditional Use Permit (UP 95-14 / M 97-14),
approved by Planning Commission Resolutions No. 2996 and 3120, allowing operation
of a standard restaurant with general alcohol sales and late-night activities (12:00 AM
public closing).
4. The Project Site is within the C-2 (General Commercial) Zoning District, where
restaurants with late-night activities, fast-food, and outdoor active activities (drive-up
window) require issuance of a Conditional Use Permit.
8.a
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Draft CC Resol (CUP - Deny) (PLN2017-117:120 ~ 499 E. Hamilton Avenue (In-N-Out Burger Appeal))
City Council Resolution Page 2 of 7
499 E. Hamilton Avenue – In-N-Out Burger
Denial of a Conditional Use Permit w/ S&A Review (PLN2017-117)
5. The Proposed Project is an application for a Conditional Use Permit with Site and
Architectural Review (PLN2017-117) to allow construction of a 3,812 square-foot 97-seat
fast-food restaurant with a 28-vehicle double drive-through lane (i.e., drive-in service)
with outdoor active activities (drive-up window and service), a 48-seat outdoor dining
area, late-night hours, and associated site, lighting, parking, refuse collection, and
landscaping improvements, including a Minor Alteration to the Hamilton Avenue
Streetscape Standards and an adjustment to the landscape requirements, and an
increase to the allowable fence height; a Tree Removal Permit (PLN2017-118) to allow
removal of protected on-site trees; a Sign Permit (PLN2017-119) to allow a greater
number of signs and an increased sign area to permit installation of new directional,
informational/menu, "running neon," and building wall signs; and certification of a Final
Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) (PLN2017-120).
6. Chapter 21.46 of the Campbell Municipal Code (CMC) requires application for a
Conditional Use Permit for certain prescribed land use activities so that the City may
evaluate requests on case-by-case basis relative to site specific considerations for the
following reasons:
x Conditional uses are those that have a special impact or uniqueness so that their
effect on the surrounding environment cannot be determined in advance of the
use being proposed for a particular location.
x The process for reviewing Conditional Use Permit applications is intended to
protect the integrity and character of the residential, commercial, industrial, and
mixed use areas of the city, consistent with the objectives, policies, general land
uses, and implementation programs of the General Plan.
x The Conditional Use Permit process also provides for adequate review and input
for development projects that potentially impact the community, and adequate
review to ensure that development in each zoning district protects the integrity of
that district.
x A project requiring Conditional Use Permit approval is reviewed as to its location,
design configuration, and potential impacts by comparing the project to
established standards as to determine whether the permit should be approved by
weighing the public need for, and the benefit to be derived from, the project,
against any impacts it may cause.
7. The City’s exercise of the Conditional Use Permit process furthers the intent of the
Zoning Code as specified by CMC Section 21.01.30 (Purpose), including but not limited
to the implementation of the goals, objectives, policies, and programs of the General
Plan, to maintain community character and to avoid congestion.
8. In review of the Proposed Project, the City Council considered the compliance of all
applicable development standards provided by the Zoning Code, consistency with the
goals, policies, and strategies of the General Plan, and the entirety of the administrative
8.a
Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Draft CC Resol (CUP - Deny) (PLN2017-117:120 ~ 499 E. Hamilton Avenue (In-N-Out Burger Appeal))
City Council Resolution Page 3 of 7
499 E. Hamilton Avenue – In-N-Out Burger
Denial of a Conditional Use Permit w/ S&A Review (PLN2017-117)
record including staff reports, Planning Commission comment, public testimony (verbal
and written), and technical analyses.
9. The General Plan prescribes that “in making land use decisions, the City’s decision
makers must consider which land uses will best serve the public interest, while allowing
property owners reasonable property use.” (Page LUT-3).
10. The proposed project would generate 318 vehicle trips in the weekday evening peak
hour and 395 weekend vehicle trips in the weekend peak hour. In comparison, the
Elephant Bar restaurant that previously occupied the existing building on the site is
estimated to have generated 81 trips during the weekday peak hour and 116 trips during
the weekend peak hour.
11. A fast-food restaurant at this location will serve a significant number of motorists who will
exit off the highway to quickly purchase food, thereby adding to the existing traffic
issues, and provide relatively minimal service to the residents of Campbell whose
neighborhoods would be impacted.
12. The Project Site’s prominent location with proximity to Highway 17 and the Hamilton
Light Rail Station supports a higher and better use of land than the Proposed Project
which does not maximize the development capacity of the subject property as evidenced
by the .07 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) and single-story design where a 0.40 FAR and a 75-
foot height limit are specified by the C-2 (General Commercial) Zoning District.
13. A higher and better use of land, such as a large format retail center, would better
capitalize on the proximity to the aforementioned transportation infrastructure in a
manner that would better serve the residents of Campbell’s interests in furtherance of
General Plan Strategy LUT-13.2d which encourages large retailers on Hamilton Avenue:
Strategy LUT-13.2d: Large Retailers on Hamilton Avenue: Encourage large retailers to locate
along Hamilton Avenue and Bascom Avenue by maintaining large parcels,
encouraging lot consolidation, and discouraging parcel adjustments that
reduce lot sizes.
14. The fiscal effect of a higher and better use of the Project Site has also been considered.
Based on the City’s sales-tax analysis, the Proposed Project would not result in a
greater generation of sales tax revenue than reestablishment of the former restaurant.
Moreover, a more intensive and productive use, in particular, a hotel that generates
transit occupancy tax would be more fiscally advantageous to the City consistent with
General Plan Strategies LUT-13.2c and LUT-13.1d:
Strategy LUT-13.1c: Fiscal Effects of Land Use: Evaluate the fiscal effects of different land uses on
City revenues and services.
Strategy LUT-13.1a: Hotels: Attract major hotels to Campbell as a convenience for local residents
and businesses, as well as a tax generator for the community.
15. A higher and better use will likely generate a greater number and variety of jobs than the
proposed fast-food restaurant consistent with General Plan Policy LUT-2.4:
8.a
Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Draft CC Resol (CUP - Deny) (PLN2017-117:120 ~ 499 E. Hamilton Avenue (In-N-Out Burger Appeal))
City Council Resolution Page 4 of 7
499 E. Hamilton Avenue – In-N-Out Burger
Denial of a Conditional Use Permit w/ S&A Review (PLN2017-117)
Policy LUT-2.4: Jobs and Housing Balance: Maintain Campbell’s balance of jobs and housing
units to encourage residents to work in Campbell, and to limit the impact on
the regional transportation system
16. The Proposed Project’s site circulation would create unforeseen vehicular conflicts on
Almarida Drive as motorist attempt to enter and exit the project site that cannot be
adequately improved through “Keep Clear” markings, disrupting the ability of residents
from being able to reasonably access the neighborhood, inconsistent with General Plan
Policy LUT-5.3h:
Strategy LUT-5.3h: Parking and Circulation: Provide adequate parking and encourage circulation
patterns to serve commercial districts so as to discourage commercial traffic
into adjacent residential zones.
17. The Proposed Project’s internal configuration would impede the ability of motorist
entering from Almarida Drive to access the drive-through lane without having to circle
the interior of the parking lot or to make a multi-point turn in the drive-aisle, inconsistent
with General Plan Strategy LUT 12.1c. Further, the internal configuration has the
potential to create garbage dumpster access obstructions and to impede on accessible
parking stalls given the location of the drive-through lane.
Strategy LUT-12.1c: Parking Lot Design: Design parking lots to minimize impacts on the street
system by providing adequate sized driveways, sufficient queuing and
efficient circulation.
18. The Proposed Project includes "late night activities" including public business hours of
10:00 AM to 1:00 AM, Sunday to Thursday and 10:00 AM to 1:30 AM, Friday and
Saturday, and general operational (staffed) hours of 24 hours/day, daily. General Plan
Strategy 9.1d recognizes that late night activities can present potential issues,
particularly noise impacts to neighboring residents stemming from vehicles (engines,
radios, etc.), patrons (talking and loitering in the parking lot), and staff (disposing of trash
and bottles), as well as potential criminal activity, such that additional scrutiny is
warranted in review of such request.
Policy LUT-9.1d: Land Use Limits and Controls: Amend the Zoning Ordinance to establish
limits and controls regarding operating hours for uses that are incompatible
with adjoining residential dues to noise, traffic or other disturbances.
19. Late-night operation of the proposed fast-food restaurant in proximity to a residential
community increases the likelihood of neighborhood disturbance. Specifically, in the
professional judgment of the Campbell Police Department, a closing time of 1:30 AM
would result in the attraction of Santana Row bar customers to the proposed fast-food
restaurant after midnight (the closing time of Santana Row bars and restaurants)
resulting in an increased likelihood of criminal activity and/or disruptive behavior, such as
fights in the parking lot. The Proposed Project would, therefore, result in activity of a type
and degree that would result in unacceptable land use conflicts discouraged by General
Plan guidance on land use compatibility (Page LUT-30):
8.a
Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Draft CC Resol (CUP - Deny) (PLN2017-117:120 ~ 499 E. Hamilton Avenue (In-N-Out Burger Appeal))
City Council Resolution Page 5 of 7
499 E. Hamilton Avenue – In-N-Out Burger
Denial of a Conditional Use Permit w/ S&A Review (PLN2017-117)
Land Use Compatibility
The regulation of land use is intended to promote land use compatibility. Land use incompatibility will
result if development standards do not adequately address conflicts between different land use types.
Incompatibility can occur when noise, traffic, parking, fumes or mechanical vibration disturbs adjacent
uses. Incompatible land uses may occur where residential homes are adjacent to non-residential
uses (such as commercial or industrial) or significantly higher density residential uses. Land uses
typically incompatible with residential uses include, automobile and truck repair shops, late night and
early morning uses, fast food establishments, and entertainment establishments such as nightclubs,
bars, dance clubs, video arcade and liquor establishments. Limiting their number, controlling their
locations and hours or methods of operation, or otherwise restricting their development or expansion
can mitigate the negative effects of incompatible uses.
20. The land use incompatibilities that would result from introduction of a drive-through fast-
food restaurant with a 1:30 AM public closing time would also conflict with General Plan
Policy LUT-5.1 which requires the City to protect the integrity of the City’s
neighborhoods:
Policy LUT-5.1: Neighborhood Integrity: Recognize that the City is composed of residential,
industrial and commercial neighborhoods, each with its own individual
character; and allow change consistent with reinforcing positive neighborhood
values, while protecting the integrity of the city’s neighborhoods.
21. In order to accommodate increased vehicle queues on the eastbound Hamilton Avenue
left-turn lane onto Almarida Drive that would result from the Proposed Project, the EIR
incorporated a Mitigation Measure (TRANS-4a) that required the applicant to lengthen the
existing turn-lane by additional 50 linear feet plus a standard 90-foot taper transition.
Although feasible, this mitigation measure would require the elimination of existing median
landscaping, including City street trees, inconsistent with General Plan Strategy LUT-
10.2d and Policies OSP-4.1 and OSP-4.2:
Strategy LUT-10.2d: Landscaping as a Theme: Use similar types of trees and landscaping to
create a theme within districts or neighborhoods. Medians should also be
used to create a theme to distinguish major thoroughfares and prominent
streets.
Policy OSP-4.1: Street Trees: Encourage planting and retention of street trees in landscaped
street medians and along City streets.
Policy OSP-4.2: Median Landscaping: Consider construction of landscaped medians on major
City streets, where feasible.
22. With the addition of project generated trips to the cumulative volumes at the Hamilton
Avenue/Salmar Avenue-SR 17 southbound off-ramp intersection, the intersection is
expected to operate at Level of Service ‘F’ under the Santa Clara VTA level of service
criteria. The addition of the project related trips to the cumulative volume would increase
the volume to capacity ratios by more than 0.01 and increase the average control delay
for critical movements by more than four seconds absent the widening of the
southbound approach at the intersection of the Hamilton Avenue/ Salmar-SR 17
southbound off-ramp to include three left turn lanes, one through lane and one right turn
lane.
8.a
Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Draft CC Resol (CUP - Deny) (PLN2017-117:120 ~ 499 E. Hamilton Avenue (In-N-Out Burger Appeal))
City Council Resolution Page 6 of 7
499 E. Hamilton Avenue – In-N-Out Burger
Denial of a Conditional Use Permit w/ S&A Review (PLN2017-117)
23. The anticipated improvements to the Highway 17 off-ramp have not been completely
vetted with the potential of underestimating the project cost and creating uncertainty as
to when or if the improvements will be constructed.
24. Rejection of the Proposed Project does not deny the property owner reasonable use of
the property as the current restaurant building may be reoccupied by a standard
restaurant tenant who may exercise the existing Conditional Use Permit (UP 95-14 / M
97-14) to allow operation of the restaurant with general alcohol sales and late-night
activities (12:00 AM public closing).
Based upon the foregoing findings of fact pursuant to CMC Section 21.46.040 and Section
21.46.050 and in consideration of the entire administrative record, and in weighing the
public need for, and the benefit to be derived from, the project, against any impacts it may
cause, the City Council further finds and concludes that:
Conditional Use Permit Findings (CMC Sec. 21.46.040):
1. The proposed use is not consistent with the General Plan;
2. The proposed site is not adequate in terms of size and shape to accommodate the
fences and walls, landscaping, parking and loading facilities, yards, and other
development features required in order to integrate the use with uses in the surrounding
area;
3. The proposed site is not adequately served by streets of sufficient capacity to carry the
kind and quantity of traffic the use would be expected to generate;
4. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed use are not
compatible with the existing and future land uses on-site and in the vicinity of the subject
property;
5. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the proposed use at the location
proposed will be detrimental to the comfort, health, morals, peace, safety, or general
welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use, or be
detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the
general welfare of the city;
Site and Architectural Review Permit Finding (CMC Sec. 21.42.060.B):
6. The project will not be consistent with the general plan; and
7. The project will not aid in the harmonious development of the immediate area;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council denying with prejudice a Conditional
Use Permit with Site and Architectural Review (PLN2017-117) to allow construction of a
3,812 square-foot 97-seat fast-food restaurant with a 28-vehicle double drive-through lane
with outdoor active activities (drive-up window), a 48-seat outdoor seating area, late-night
activities, and associated site, lighting, parking, refuse collection, and landscaping
improvements, including a Minor Alteration to the Hamilton Avenue Streetscape Standards
8.a
Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Draft CC Resol (CUP - Deny) (PLN2017-117:120 ~ 499 E. Hamilton Avenue (In-N-Out Burger Appeal))
City Council Resolution Page 7 of 7
499 E. Hamilton Avenue – In-N-Out Burger
Denial of a Conditional Use Permit w/ S&A Review (PLN2017-117)
and an adjustment to the landscape requirements, and an increase to the allowable fence
height, for property located at 499 E. Hamilton Avenue, subject to the prohibition of the
same or substantially similar development proposal being submitted within twelve months
pursuant to Campbell Municipal Code Section 21.56.080, which shall specifically include a
fast-food restaurant with or without a drive-through.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _______ day of ________________, 2019, by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
APPROVED:
Richard M. Waterman, Mayor
ATTEST:
Wendy Wood, City Clerk
8.a
Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Draft CC Resol (CUP - Deny) (PLN2017-117:120 ~ 499 E. Hamilton Avenue (In-N-Out Burger Appeal))
RESOLUTION NO. ____
BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CAMPBELL DENYING A SIGN PERMIT (PLN2017-119) TO ALLOW
A GREATER NUMBER OF SIGNS AND AN INCREASED SIGN
AREA TO PERMIT INSTALLATION OF NEW DIRECTIONAL,
INFORMATIONAL/MENU, "RUNNING NEON," AND BUILDING WALL
SIGNS, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 499 E. HAMILTON
AVENUE. FILE NO.: PLN2017-119
After notification and public hearing, as specified by law and after presentation by the
Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed.
The City Council finds as follows with regard to File Number PLN2017-119:
Environmental Finding
1. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the Proposed Project in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality (CEQA) and considered by the
Planning Commission and City Council. However, absent an affirmative decision on the
Proposed Project, the EIR need not be certified since the City Council’s action to deny
is Statutorily Exempt pursuant to California Public Resource Code Section 21080(b)(5).
Evidentiary Findings
1. The Project site is a 1 ¼ acre parcel located at the northwest corner of East Hamilton
Avenue and Almarida Drive, approximately 350 feet west of the Southbound Highway 17
off-ramp and ⅓ mile from the Hamilton Light Rail Station.
2. The Project Site is within the C-2 (General Commercial) Zoning District as shown on the
City of Campbell Zoning Map.
3. The Project Site is designated General Commercial as shown on the General Plan Land
Use Diagram.
4. The Proposed Project is an application for a Conditional Use Permit with Site and
Architectural Review (PLN2017-117) to allow construction of a 3,812 square-foot 97-seat
fast-food restaurant with a 28-vehicle double drive-through lane with outdoor activities
(drive-up window), a 48-seat outdoor dining area, late-night hours, and associated site,
lighting, parking, refuse collection, and landscaping improvements, including a Minor
Alteration to the Hamilton Avenue Streetscape Standards and an adjustment to the
landscape requirements, and an increase to the allowable fence height; a Tree Removal
Permit (PLN2017-118) to allow removal of protected on-site trees; a Sign Permit
(PLN2017-119) to allow a greater number of signs and an increased sign area to permit
installation of new directional, informational/menu, "running neon," and building wall
signs; and certification of a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) (PLN2017-120).
5. By separatH action, the City Council has denied the Conditional Use Permit with Siteand
Architectural Review (PLN2017-117) element of the Proposed Project forconstruction of
the fast-food restaurant. Without construction of the new building, the
8.b
Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Draft CC Resol (Sign - Deny) (PLN2017-117:120 ~ 499 E. Hamilton Avenue (In-N-Out Burger Appeal))
City Council Resolution Page 2 of 2
499 E. Hamilton Avenue – In-N-Out Burger
Denial Sign Permit (PLN2017-119)
application for a Sign Permit is an inoperative entitlement request as the existing
property improvements will be maintained.
Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the City Council further finds and concludes that:
Increased Sign Area Findings (CMC Sec. 21.30.030.C.4):
1. The signs otherwise allowed by this chapter would be visible to the public as there are
no issues of distance or obstructions that are beyond the control of the owner of the site
on which the signs are or would be located.
Additional Signs Findings (CMC Sec. 21.30.030.C.5):
2. The signs otherwise allowed by this chapter would be visible to the public as there are
no issues of distance or obstructions that are beyond the control of the owner of the site
on which the signs are or would be located;
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council denies a Sign Permit (PLN2017-
119) to allow a greater number of signs and an increased sign area to permit installation of
new directional, informational/menu, "running neon," and building wall signs, for property
located at 499 E. Hamilton Avenue.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _______ day of ________________, 2019, by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
APPROVED:
Richard M. Waterman, Mayor
ATTEST:
Wendy Wood, City Clerk
8.b
Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Draft CC Resol (Sign - Deny) (PLN2017-117:120 ~ 499 E. Hamilton Avenue (In-N-Out Burger Appeal))
RESOLUTION NO. ____
BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CAMPBELL DENYING A TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (PLN2017-118)
TO ALLOW REMOVAL OF PROTECTED ON-SITE TREES FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 499 E. HAMILTON AVENUE. FILE NO.:
PLN2017-118
After notification and public hearing, as specified by law and after presentation by the
Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed.
The City Council finds as follows with regard to File Number PLN2017-118:
Environmental Finding
1. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the Proposed Project in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality (CEQA) and considered by the
Planning Commission and City Council. However, absent an affirmative decision on the
Proposed Project, the EIR need not be certified since the City Council’s action to deny
is Statutorily Exempt pursuant to California Public Resource Code Section 21080(b)(5).
Evidentiary Findings
1. The Project site is a 1 ¼ acre parcel located at the northwest corner of East Hamilton
Avenue and Almarida Drive, approximately 350 feet west of the Southbound Highway 17
off-ramp and ⅓ mile from the Hamilton Light Rail Station.
2. The Project Site is within the C-2 (General Commercial) Zoning District as shown on the
City of Campbell Zoning Map.
3. The Project Site is designated General Commercial as shown on the General Plan Land
Use Diagram.
4. The Proposed Project is an application for a Conditional Use Permit with Site and
Architectural Review (PLN2017-117) to allow construction of a 3,812 square-foot 97-seat
fast-food restaurant with a 28-vehicle double drive-through lane with outdoor activities
(drive-up window), a 48-seat outdoor dining area, late-night hours, and associated site,
lighting, parking, refuse collection, and landscaping improvements, including a Minor
Alteration to the Hamilton Avenue Streetscape Standards and an adjustment to the
landscape requirements, and an increase to the allowable fence height; a Tree Removal
Permit (PLN2017-118) to allow removal of protected on-site trees; a Sign Permit
(PLN2017-119) to allow a greater number of signs and an increased sign area to permit
installation of new directional, informational/menu, "running neon," and building wall
signs; and certification of a Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) (PLN2017-120).
5. By separatH action, the City Council has denied the Conditional Use Permit with Siteand
Architectural Review (PLN2017-117) element of the Proposed Project forconstruction of
the fast-food restaurant. Without construction of the new building, the
8.c
Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Draft CC Resol (TRP - Deny) (PLN2017-117:120 ~ 499 E. Hamilton Avenue (In-N-Out Burger Appeal))
City Council Resolution Page 2 of 2
499 E. Hamilton Avenue – In-N-Out Burger
Denial of Tree Removal Permit (PLN2017-118)
application for a Tree Removal Permit is an inoperative entitlement request as the
existing property improvements will be maintained.
Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the City Council further finds and concludes that:
Tree Removal Permit Findings (CMC Sec. 21.32.080.A.5):
1. The retention of the trees neither restricts the economic enjoyment of the property nor
creates an unusual hardship for the property owner by severely limiting the use of the
property in a manner not typically experienced by owners of similarly zoned and situated
properties, and the applicant has not demonstrated to the satisfaction of the City Council
that there are no reasonable alternatives to preserve the trees due to the number of site
constraints of the infill site.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council denies a Tree Removal Permit
(PLN2017-118) to allow removal of protected on-site trees, for property located at 499 E.
Hamilton Avenue.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this _______ day of ________________, 2019, by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
APPROVED:
Richard M. Waterman, Mayor
ATTEST:
Wendy Wood, City Clerk
8.c
Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Draft CC Resol (TRP - Deny) (PLN2017-117:120 ~ 499 E. Hamilton Avenue (In-N-Out Burger Appeal))
8.d
Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: IN-N-OUT Letter to Campbell City Council (PLN2017-117:120 ~ 499 E. Hamilton Avenue (In-N-Out Burger Appeal))
8.d
Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: IN-N-OUT Letter to Campbell City Council (PLN2017-117:120 ~ 499 E. Hamilton Avenue (In-N-Out Burger Appeal))
8.d
Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: IN-N-OUT Letter to Campbell City Council (PLN2017-117:120 ~ 499 E. Hamilton Avenue (In-N-Out Burger Appeal))
8.d
Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: IN-N-OUT Letter to Campbell City Council (PLN2017-117:120 ~ 499 E. Hamilton Avenue (In-N-Out Burger Appeal))
8.d
Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: IN-N-OUT Letter to Campbell City Council (PLN2017-117:120 ~ 499 E. Hamilton Avenue (In-N-Out Burger Appeal))
8.d
Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: IN-N-OUT Letter to Campbell City Council (PLN2017-117:120 ~ 499 E. Hamilton Avenue (In-N-Out Burger Appeal))
8.d
Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: IN-N-OUT Letter to Campbell City Council (PLN2017-117:120 ~ 499 E. Hamilton Avenue (In-N-Out Burger Appeal))