200306 Cannery Place_ResubmittalRESUBMITTAL IN RESPONSE TO CITY COMMENTS MARCH 6, 2020
CANNERY PLACE
CANNERY PLACE March 6, 2020 2
PRELIMINARY RESIDENTIAL AREA TABULATIONS PRELIMINARY HOTEL AREA TABULATIONS
Residential Residential Residential Residential Residential Hotel Hotel Hotel Hotel Hotel Hotel
Level Net Rentable GSF*Amenity GSF* *Core GSF***Retail GSF****Total GSF Level Rooms GSF*Amenity GSF* *Meeting GSF Core GSF***Retail GSF****Total GSF
7 21,960 1,260 6,000 29,220 7 13,010 3,090 16,100
6 32,030 7,130 39,160 6 13,010 3,090 16,100
5 32,700 7,130 39,830 5 13,420 3,090 16,510
4 32,700 7,130 39,830 4 13,420 3,090 16,510
3 30,810 7,130 37,940 3 9,900 3,090 12,990
2 31,150 3,350 7,130 41,630 2 8,220 1,200 3,540 3,090 16,050
1 3,830 6,890 7,400 3,310 21,430 1 2,520 5,680 3,600 11,800
Total 185,180 11,500 49,050 3,310 249,040 Total 70,980 3,720 24,220 3,600 106,060
NOTES:NOTES:
* Residential Net Rentable SF calculation includes exterior walls, corridor walls, and party walls * Hotel Rooms calculation includes exterior walls, corridor walls, and party walls
** Residential Amenity SF includes entry lobby, leasing office, club room, fitness room, etc.** Hotel Amenity SF includes entry lobby and amenity spaces
*** Residential Core SF includes back of house, elevators, stairs, corridors, etc.*** Hotel Core SF includes back of house, elevators, stairs, corridors etc.
**** Amenity / Food and Beverage Commercial **** Meeting space / Amenity / Food and Beverage Commercial
PARKING TABULATION
ON-SITE STALL DISTRIBUTION
Level Shared - Standard Shared - Stacker Residential - Stacker Total
9' x 20' MIN.
1 88 0 0 88
B 74 110 253 437
Total 162 110 253 525
* Meeting space / Amenity / Food and Beverage Commercial
PARKING STALLS
PRELIMINARY UNIT MIX*PRELIMINARY KEY MIX*
LEVEL STUDIO 1 BED 2 BED 3 BED UNIT LEVEL KEY
30'x18' typ.30'x24' typ.30'x35' typ 30'x46'' typ.15'x27.5' typ.
540 GSF typ.720 GSF typ.1050 GSF typ.1380 GSF typ.412.5 GSF typ.
7 1 13 10 1 25 7 31
6 2 18 16 1 37 6 31
5 2 19 16 1 38 5 32
4 2 19 16 1 38 4 32
3 2 18 15 1 36 3 24
2 2 16 14 2 34 2 20
1 2 1 3 1
TOTAL 11 103 89 8 211 TOTAL 170
%5%49%42%4%100%%100%
AVG KEY SIZE**
870 421
* Unit and Key GSF includes exterior, corridor and party walls
** Calculated using Preliminary Residential and Hotel Area Tabulation
AVERAGE UNIT SIZE**
path: Z:\19004 Campbell Mixed Use\6 DRAWING\6.20 Presentations\200131 Authorization Application - UPDATED\Excel\BUILDING DATA CALCULATIONS_Campbell.xlsx
PRELIMINARY UNIT MIX*PRELIMINARY KEY MIX*
LEVELSTUDIO1 BED2 BED3 BEDUNIT LEVEL KEY
30'x18' typ.30'x24' typ.30'x35' typ30'x46'' typ.15'x27.5' typ.
540 GSF typ.720 GSF typ.1050 GSF typ.1380 GSF typ.412.5 GSF typ.
7113101 25 7 31
6218161 37 6 31
5219161 38 5 32
4219161 38 4 32
3218151 36 3 24
2216142 34 2 20
121 3 1
TOTAL11103898211 TOTAL 170
%5%49%42%4%100%%100%
AVG KEY SIZE**
870 421
* Unit and Key GSF includes exterior, corridor and party walls
** Calculated using Preliminary Residential and Hotel Area Tabulation
AVERAGE UNIT SIZE**
path: Z:\19004 Campbell Mixed Use\6 DRAWING\6.20 Presentations\200131 Authorization Application - UPDATED\Excel\BUILDING DATA CALCULATIONS_Campbell.xlsx
PROJECT DATAPARKING
HOTEL
RESIDENTIAL CA- 17EAST CAMPBELL AVENUE
BARBANO AVENUEUNION AVENUEMICHAEL DRIVES BASCOM AVENUEPRUNEYARDSHOPPINGCENTER
SITE AREA: 2.445 ACRES
RESIDENTIAL BLDG.
FLOORS: 7
HEIGHT: 75’
UNITS: 211
HOTEL BLDG.
FLOORS: 7
HEIGHT: 75’
KEYS: 170
PARKING
TOTAL: 525
( SEE PARKING DATA, PG. 3 )
SITE
PRELIMINARY RESIDENTIAL AREA TABULATIONS PRELIMINARY HOTEL AREA TABULATIONS
ResidentialResidentialResidential Residential Residential Hotel Hotel Hotel Hotel Hotel Hotel
LevelNet Rentable GSF*Amenity GSF* *Core GSF***Retail GSF****Total GSF Level Rooms GSF*Amenity GSF* *Meeting GSF Core GSF***Retail GSF****Total GSF
721,9601,260 6,000 29,220 7 13,010 3,090 16,100
632,030 7,130 39,160 6 13,010 3,090 16,100
532,700 7,130 39,830 5 13,420 3,090 16,510
432,700 7,130 39,830 4 13,420 3,090 16,510
330,810 7,130 37,940 3 9,900 3,090 12,990
231,1503,350 7,130 41,630 2 8,220 1,200 3,540 3,090 16,050
13,8306,890 7,400 3,310 21,430 1 2,520 5,680 3,600 11,800
Total185,18011,500 49,050 3,310 249,040 Total 70,980 3,720 24,220 3,600 106,060
NOTES:NOTES:
* Residential Net Rentable SF calculation includes exterior walls, corridor walls, and party walls * Hotel Rooms calculation includes exterior walls, corridor walls, and party walls
** Residential Amenity SF includes entry lobby, leasing office, club room, fitness room, etc.** Hotel Amenity SF includes entry lobby and amenity spaces
*** Residential Core SF includes back of house, elevators, stairs, corridors, etc.*** Hotel Core SF includes back of house, elevators, stairs, corridors etc.
**** Amenity / Food and Beverage Commercial **** Meeting space / Amenity / Food and Beverage Commercial
CANNERY PLACE March 6, 2020 3
PARKING
PER HEXAGON TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS, INC. PARKING ANALYSIS
STANDARD STALL: 9’X20’
PARALLEL STALL: 8.5’X22’
Memorandum
Date: February 27, 2020
To: Dennis L. Randall, Acquity Realty, Inc.
From: Gary Black Jocelyn Lee
Subject: Parking Analysis for the Proposed Mixed-Use Development in Campbell, California
Hexagon Transportation Consultants, Inc. has completed a parking analysis for your proposed mixed-use development at the southwest corner of Bascom Avenue and Campbell Avenue in Campbell, California. The project involves demolishing a gas station, restaurant store, and restaurant and constructing 211 residential units, 170 hotel rooms, and up to 10,000 square feet (s.f.) of restaurant space.
The purpose of this parking analysis memo is to identify the estimated parking demand for the proposed project, and to develop parking strategies to ensure the parking supply is adequate to serve the hotel, residential, and restaurant components of the project.
City Code Parking Requirements
The off-street parking requirements for the project based on the City of Campbell parking standards (Campbell Municipal Code Section 21.28.030) are as follows:
For hotels:
• 1 space for each unit, plus 1 space for each employee
For multiple residential dwellings:
• 2 spaces per studio or one-bedroom unit
• 2.5 spaces per two-or more bedroom unit
• 0.5 space for guests per unit
For restaurant uses:
• 1 space per 3 seats plus 1 space per 200 s.f. of non-dining floor area
The project is proposing 170 hotel rooms with 40 employees, 114 studio/one-bedroom units, 97 two or more-bedroom units, and up to 10,000 s.f. of ground floor restaurant space with 162 seats. Based on this breakdown, the project is required to provide a total of 858 parking spaces: 210 spaces to serve the hotel, 577 spaces to serve the residential use (471 residential spaces and 106 guest spaces) and 71 spaces to serve the restaurant use.
Since the project is a mixed-use development, 50 percent of the guest parking spaces required for the residential component may be counted towards satisfying the parking requirement for the restaurant component as shared parking. Therefore, the requirement could be reduced to 805 spaces (210 spaces for the hotel, 577 spaces for residential use , and 18 spaces for the
DEMAND
RESTAURANT 154
HOTEL 94
RESIDENTIAL 253
TOTAL 489 + 5%
TOTAL 513
PROVIDED
SHARED PARKING - STANDARD (SELF PARK) 162
(HOTEL, RESTAURANT, RESIDENTIAL VISITOR PARKING)
SHARED PARKING - STACKER (VALET) 110
(HOTEL, RESTAURANT, RESIDENTIAL VISITOR PARKING)
RESIDENTIAL - STACKER (SELF PARK) 253
TOTAL 525
CANNERY PLACE March 6, 2020 4
The Cannery Parking Analysis February 27, 2020
Page | 2
restaurant). The project would be required to submit a Parking Management Plan, and the parking must be located in a manner that is accessible to both the residential and restaurant uses with posted signs stating the shared uses.
Parking Supply
The project is proposing to provide a total of 335 parking spaces (85 spaces for the hotel, 230 spaces for residential use, and 20 spaces for the restaurant), which is 523 parking spaces fewer than the City’s requirement. A shared parking analysis was conducted using parking ratios from other sources to determine an adequate number of parking spaces required for the development.
Parking Analysis
The parking demand associated with the proposed mixed-use development was evaluated based on ITE Parking Generation rates and local surveys (see Appendix A). Local surveys were conducted at similar Bay Area apartments and hotels between 2011 and 2019. Parking rates for residential uses were determined based on an average of parking spaces per bedroom. Parking rates for hotels were determined based on an average of parking spaces per occupied room. The recommended parking ratios before shared parking are based on the local surveys for the hotel and residential uses and ITE parking rates for the restaurant. The analysis reflects a worst-case scenario in that it assumes 100 percent occupancy of all hotel rooms. The parking demand without shared parking would be 500 spaces (See Table 1). Table 1 Parking Analysis
Shared parking is the use of a parking space to serve two or more individual land uses due to variations in parking demand by hour among differing land uses. Summing the parking demand generated by each use at every hour generally results in an overall peak parking demand for a mixed-use site that is less than the sum of the peak parking demands for each individual use. Thus, the application of the principal of shared parking may reduce the total parking demand for mixed-use developments.
The shared parking analysis presented in this memorandum is based on time of day factors obtained from the Urban Land Institute (ULI) Shared Parking, 2nd Edition, the ITE Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition. Table 2 shows the hourly parking demand for each use and the
Land Use
Local Parking
Surveys
Restaurant 10,000 sf 15.35 --154
Residential 316 rooms --0.80 253
Hotel 170 rooms --0.55 94
Total Number of Parking Spaces 500
Source: ITE Parking Generation Manual , 5th Edition, 2019.
1. 85th Percentile ITE parking rates for Quality Restaurant (Land Use 931) on a weekday are used.
ITE Parking Rate1
Number of
Spaces
RequiredSize
The Cannery Parking Analysis February 27, 2020
Page | 3
site’s total parking demand with shared parking. With shared parking, the maximum parking demand would be 489 spaces. The peak parking demand is expected to occur at 10 PM on weekdays. Shared parking would
result in a minimal reduction in parking (2%) because all three uses experience their peak parking demand in the evening. Table 2 Shared Parking Analysis
Conclusion
With shared parking, the estimated peak parking demand for the project is 489 spaces. The project proposes to provide 335 parking spaces, which is insufficient. In order to meet the demand, the
project should provide 489 parking spaces plus a cushion of about 5% to ensure that vacant spaces can easily be found. This equals a total recommended parking supply of 513 spaces.
Wkdy Wkdy Wkdy Wkdy
Parking Demand by Hour:
6 a.m.0 253 89 342
7 a.m.5 228 84 316
8 a.m.12 215 77 304
9 a.m.17 202 69 288
10 a.m.40 190 64 293
11 a.m.74 177 64 314
Noon 119 164 61 344
1 p.m.119 177 60 355
2 p.m.106 177 60 343
3 p.m.69 177 64 310
4 p.m.83 190 64 336
5 p.m.122 215 65 402
6 p.m.148 228 70 445
7 p.m.154 245 70 469
8 p.m.154 248 75 477
9 p.m.154 250 79 484
10 p.m.148 253 89 489
11 p.m.119 253 94 465
Midnight 42 253 94 388
154 253 94 489
Time of Day Source: Urban Land Institute (ULI) Shared Parking, 2nd Edition, 2005 .
Notes:
1. Parking requirements for the residential and hotel uses are based on previous surveys.
Parking requirement for the restaurant use is based on the ITE Parking Generation
Manual, 5th Edition,
Total DemandResidentialHotelRestaurant
Max. Demand
Hour of Day
Parking Requirement1
CANNERY PLACE March 6, 2020 5
Appendix A
Local Parking Surveys
Hexagon Apartment Parking Count Data
Count Date1 bedroom units2 bedroom units3 bedroom units4 bedroom unitsTotal Apartment UnitsTotal BedroomsBedrooms to units ratioOccupied Parking SpacesTotal Parking SpacesPercent OccupiedOccupied spaces to units ratioParking Supply per UnitParking Supply per BedroomOccupied spaces to bedrooms ratio
Markham Apartments Siena Apartments Arioso Apartments Archstone Cupertino Biltmore Apartments Verandas The Metropolitan Altaire Apartments The Plaza, Foster City
Township,
Redwood City Colonnade, Los Altos
10/22/2011 10/22/2011 10/27/2011 2/16/2012 2/16/2012 12/3/2018-12/9/2018259368114578 115 5 150 71 1002459212015293912138586700014812631930000000335041282013111791202181033071321677492203214912882403333304831962341.49 1.72 1.60 1.58 1.61 2.00 1.53 3.20 1.57 1.48 1.4057518227538527618830519444214019152935322969316932173%78%82%64%83%60%1.14 1.42 1.37 1.24 1.54 1.57 1.40 1.88 1.44 1.06 1.141.70 1.97 1.91 2.26 1.28 1.921.08 1.23 0.95 1.43 0.86 1.370.77 0.83 0.86 0.78 0.96 0.78 0.92 0.59 0.92 0.71 0.82
3/7/2017-3/9/2017
Cupertino San Mateo
7/27/2011 & 7/27/2011
P:\Active\Campbell\The Cannery Parking - 20JL02\Counts\Hexagon Apartment Parking Counts_2019 Updates.xls 2/27/2020
Hexagon Apartment Parking Count Data
All Sites Average River- view North Park The Shadows Apartments Central Park Apartments Park Place Apartments North Park Apartments
Avalon Mountain View
Avalon Towers on the Peninsula Madera Apartments
Weekday WeekendCount Date 2/28/2018 3/1/2018 2/14/2012 2/14/2012 2/16/2012 2/16-17/2012 2/23/2012 3/6/2012 6/25-26/2013 10/3/2018 9/29/20181 bedroom units 814 1340 92 68 181 98 117 90 116 550 5502 bedroom units 494 1301 64 204 186 90 75 115 87 216 2163 bedroom units 0 121 24 82 6 0 56 6 0 04 bedroom units 0 0 0 0Total Apartment Units 13,615 1308 2762 180 354 373 188 248 211 203 766 766Total Bedrooms 20,766 1,802 4,305 292 722 571 278 435 338 290 982 982Bedrooms to units ratio 1.53 1.38 1.56 1.62 2.04 1.53 1.48 1.75 1.60 1.43 1.28 1.28Occupied Parking Spaces 16,681 1,570 3,265 219 490 339 215 301 247 206 882 868Total Parking Spaces 17433 1805 3536 341 696 511 324 426 529 313 1157 1157Percent Occupied 87%92%64%70%66%66%71%47%66%76%75%Occupied spaces to units ratio 1.23 1.20 1.18 1.22 1.38 0.91 1.14 1.21 1.17 1.01 1.15 1.13Parking Supply per Unit 1.60 1.38 1.28 1.89 1.97 1.37 1.72 1.72 2.51 1.54 1.51 1.51Parking Supply per Bedroom 1.03 1.00 0.82 1.17 0.96 0.89 1.17 0.98 1.57 1.08 1.18 1.18Occupied spaces to bedrooms ratio 0.80 0.87 0.76 0.75 0.68 0.59 0.77 0.69 0.73 0.71 0.90 0.88
San Jose Mountain View Sunnyvale
Spruce Apartments
P:\Active\Campbell\The Cannery Parking - 20JL02\Counts\Hexagon Apartment Parking Counts_2019 Updates.xls 2/27/2020
Hexagon Apartment Parking Count Data
Count Date1 bedroom units2 bedroom units3 bedroom units4 bedroom unitsTotal Apartment UnitsTotal BedroomsBedrooms to units ratioOccupied Parking SpacesTotal Parking SpacesPercent OccupiedOccupied spaces to units ratioParking Supply per UnitParking Supply per BedroomOccupied spaces to bedrooms ratio
Weekday Weekend Weekday Weekend Weekday Weekend Weekday Weekend Weekday Weekend9/12/17-9/14/2017 9/16/17-9/17/17 9/12/17-9/14/2017 9/16/17-9/17/17 9/12/17-9/14/2017 9/16/17-9/17/17 9/12/17-9/14/2017 9/16/17-9/17/17 9/12/17-9/14/2017 9/16/17-9/17/17129129114114118118858550250216016014514510410488884944940000000044000000000028928925925922222217317310001000449449404404326326261261150215021.55 1.55 1.56 1.56 1.47 1.47 1.51 1.51 1.50 1.503533643173142742712122191,317 12854744744624623783783453451670167074%77%69%68%72%72%61%63%79%77%1.22 1.26 1.22 1.21 1.23 1.22 1.23 1.27 1.32 1.291.64 1.64 1.78 1.78 1.70 1.70 1.99 1.99 1.67 1.671.06 1.06 1.14 1.14 1.16 1.16 1.32 1.32 1.11 1.110.79 0.81 0.78 0.78 0.84 0.83 0.81 0.84 0.88 0.86
Park Central Mansion Grove
Santa Clara
Hearth North Hearth South Cobalt
P:\Active\Campbell\The Cannery Parking - 20JL02\Counts\Hexagon Apartment Parking Counts_2019 Updates.xls 2/27/2020
Hexagon Hotel Parking Count Data
Total RoomsOccupied Rooms
Total Parking SpacesOccupied Parking SpacesParking Demand Ratio
(spaces/occupied room)Parking Demand Ratio
(spaces/room)
Thurs.Sat.Thurs.Sat.Thurs.Sat.4/30/2015 5/2/2015 4/30/2015 5/2/2015 4/30/2015 5/2/201516016017317314514515515612516482144
153 153 283 283 127 1271151258814655107
0.74 0.80 0.70 0.89 0.67 0.74
0.72 0.78 0.51 0.84 0.38 0.74
Sheraton Inn
Sunnyvale
Courtyard Marriott
Sunnyvale
Hilton Garden Inn
Mountain View
Hexagon Hotel Parking Count Data
Total RoomsOccupied RoomsTotal Parking Spaces
Occupied Parking SpacesParking Demand Ratio
(spaces/occupied room)Parking Demand Ratio (spaces/room)
Tues.Wed.Thurs Tues.Wed.Thurs Tues.Wed.Thurs5/16/2017 5/16/2017 5/18/2017 5/16/2017 5/16/2017 5/18/2017 5/16/2017 5/16/2017 5/18/2017
130 130 130 157 157 157 132 132 132124125124156154155124127104
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
76 72 78 64 68 67 46 44 49
0.61 0.58 0.63 0.41 0.44 0.43 0.37 0.35 0.47
0.58 0.55 0.60 0.41 0.43 0.43 0.35 0.33 0.37
Bay LandingSan Mateo Hilton Garden InnSan Mateo Hilton Garden InnBurlingame
Hexagon Hotel Parking Count Data
Total RoomsOccupied Rooms
Total Parking SpacesOccupied Parking SpacesParking Demand Ratio
(spaces/occupied room)Parking Demand Ratio
(spaces/room)
Hotel VueMountain ViewWed.Sat.Wed. Wed. Thurs.
6/11/2014 6/14/2014 1/9/2019 11/6/2019 11/7/2019123123569494123121489591
n/a n/a 56 n/a n/a7667206356
0.62 0.55 0.42 0.66 0.62
0.62 0.54 0.36 0.67 0.60
TownePlace SuitesRedwood CityCupertinoAloft Hotel
Hexagon Hotel Parking Count Data
Average Wed.Sat.Thurs.Sat.Tues.Wed.Thurs
Weekday 3/30/2016 4/2/2016 4/7/2016 4/9/2016 3/7/2017 3/8/2017 3/9/2017Total Rooms --82 82 120 120 116 116 116Occupied Rooms --65 68 82 69 107 110 106
Total Parking Spaces --77 77 112 112 n/a n/a n/aOccupied Parking Spaces --39 55 66 88 55 52 58Parking Demand Ratio
(spaces/occupied room)0.55 0.60 0.81 0.80 1.28 0.51 0.47 0.55Parking Demand Ratio
(spaces/room)0.48 0.48 0.67 0.55 0.73 0.47 0.45 0.50
Holiday InnBelmont Fairfield Inn & SuitesSan Carlos San MateoLos Prados Hotel
CANNERY PLACE March 6, 2020 6
SITE PHOTOS
A B C D
E
F
G
H
I
B C
E F
G H I
A
D
CANNERY PLACE March 6, 2020 7
PARCEL A
40,554 SF / .931 ACRES
PARCEL 1
33,890 SF / .778 ACRES
PARCEL A
32,060 SF / .736 ACRES
PROPOSED PARCEL LINES 0 60 12030
COMBINED PARCEL
106,504 SF / 2.445 ACRES
EXISTING PARCEL LINES
CANNERY PLACE March 6, 2020 8
SITE INFORMATION 0 60 12030
NET LOT AREA
106,504 SF30.00’43.00’47.00’
CENTERLINEOF STREET
PROPERTY LINE(48,332 SF)
NET LOT AREA
TOTAL AREA WITHIN LOT LINES
106,504 SF
GROSS LOT AREA
TOTAL AREA WITHIN LOT LINES +
AREA BETWEEN THE CENTERLINE OF
ADJACENT PUBLIC STREETS AND THE
PROPERTY LINES
106,504 SF + 48,332 SF =
154,836 SF
CANNERY PLACE March 6, 2020 9
ILLUSTRATIVE GROUND FLOOR PLAN 0 60 12030
CANNERY PLACE March 6, 2020 10
ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN 0 60 12030
CANNERY PLACE March 6, 2020 11
GROUND FLOOR PLAN 0 60 12030BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN BASCOM AVECAMPBELL AVE
BARBANO AVERAMP TO 1ST FLOOR253
110 SPACES
SPACES
SERV.
SERV.
SERV.
SERV.
SERV.
SERV.
SERV.
LOBBY
LOBBY
MEETING SPACE/AMENITY/FOOD AND BEVERAGE COMMERICAL
RESIDENTIAL
BLDG
HOTEL
BLDG
RAMP TO BASEMENTAMENITY
3
LEASING
15 52
223
4
LOBBYSERV.
990 SF
3240 SF
2520 SF
AMENITY/FOOD ANDBEVERAGE COMMERICAL3310 SF
1140 SF
1520 SF
SPACES
SERVICE/LOADING/RECEIVING
3600 SF
SERV.SERV.
SERV.
SERV.
SERV.
SPACES
SPACES
SPACES
SECTION 2
SECTION 2
SECTION 1 SECTION 1
SECTION 2
SECTION 2
SECTION 1 SECTION 1
352’-3”
75’-6”124’-0”152’-9”314’-0”325’-0”53’-0”22’-0”59’-0”61’-9”129’-3”14 SPACES
SERV.
SERV.
SERV.
SHSH
SHSH
SHSH
SHSH
SHSH
SHSH
SHSH
SHSH
SHSH
SHSH
SHSH
SHSH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SHSHSHSHSHSHSHSHSH
SHSHSH
SHSHSHSHSH SHSH
SH
SH
SH
SH
(SH)
(SH)
(SH)
SHSHSHSHSHSHSHSH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SHSH
SHSH
SHSH
SHSH
SHSH
SHSH
SHSH
SHSH
SHSH
SHSH
SHSH
SHSH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SH
SHSHSH
SHSHSH SHSHSHSH SH
SHSHSH SHSHSHSH SH
SHSHSH SHSHSHSH
SHSHSH SHSHSHSH
SHSHSH SHSHSH SHSHSH SHSHSH SHSHSHSH
RRR RRR RRR RRRRRRR
RRR RRR RRR RRRRRR
RRR RRR RRR RRRRRRR
RRR RRR RRR RRRRRRR
RRR RRR RRR RRRRRRR
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
SH
SH
SHARED PARKING - STANDARD (SELF PARK)HOTEL / RESTAURANT / RESIDENTIAL VISITOR PARKING
SHARED PARKING - TRIPLE STACKER (VALET)HOTEL / RESTAURANT / RESIDENTIAL VISITOR PARKING
RESIDENTIAL PARKING - TRIPLE STACKER (SELF PARK)RESIDENT ACCESS ONLY253
110
162
525 TOTAL
74 SPACES
CANNERY PLACE March 6, 2020 12
3RD FLOOR PLAN 0 60 120302ND FLOOR PLAN
AMENITY(DOUBLE HEIGHT)
AMENITY(DOUBLE HEIGHT)
AMENITY(DOUBLE HEIGHT)
1820 SF
1530 SF
MEETING
1860 SF
1680 SF
1200 SF
RESIDENTIAL
BLDG
HOTEL
BLDG
RESIDENTIAL
BLDG
HOTEL
BLDG
11
2
2
22S
2
11
122
222
2
1
1 1
1
2
3
1
1
1 1 1
2
2
(OPEN TO BELOW)
SECTION 2
SECTION 2
SECTION 1 SECTION 1
2
11
(OPEN TO BELOW)1
S
(OPEN TO BELOW)
(OPEN TO BELOW)
MEETING(DOUBLE HEIGHT)
11
2
2
22S
2
11
122
222
2
1
1 1
1
2
3
1
1
1 1 1
2
2
2
11
S
1
CANNERY PLACE March 6, 2020 13
6TH FLOOR PLAN 0 60 120304TH-5TH FLOOR PLAN (TYP.)
RESIDENTIAL
BLDG
HOTEL
BLDG
RESIDENTIAL
BLDG
HOTEL
BLDG
SECTION 2
SECTION 2
SECTION 1 SECTION 1
SECTION 2
SECTION 2
SECTION 1 SECTION 1
353’-6”
62’-9”124’-9”166’-0”329’-0”331’-0”66’-6”15’-0”62’-6”52’-0”135’-0”12’-6”72’-0”48’-6”196’-0”11
2
2
22S
2
11
122
222
2
1
1 1
1
2
3
1
1
1 1
2
2
2
11
1
S
1 2
1
11
2
2
22S
2
11
122
222
2
1
1 1
1
2
3
1
1
1 1 1
2
2
2
11
1
S
1 2
1
CANNERY PLACE March 6, 2020 14
7TH FLOOR PLAN 0 60 12030
RESIDENTIAL
BLDG
HOTEL
BLDG
AMENITY1260 SF
SECTION 2
SECTION 2
SECTION 1 SECTION 1
11
2
22S
2
1
1
2
3
1
1
1 1
2
2
2
11
1
1 2
1
2
CANNERY PLACE March 6, 2020 15
SECTION 2
0 30 6015SECTION 1
0 30 6015
MEETING AMENITY
SERV.
SERV.SERV.
SERV.
RAMP
PARKING
PARKINGPARKING
PARKING LOBBY
ROOM (TYP.)ROOM (TYP.)UNIT (TYP.)
UNIT (TYP.)
ROOM (TYP.)
UNIT (TYP.)UNIT (TYP.)UNIT (TYP.)UNIT (TYP.)UNIT (TYP.)
AMENITY AMENITY
LOBBY RETAIL
PARKINGPARKING
PARKING
SERV.
+75’
+65’
+55’
+45’
+35’
+25’
+15’
+0’
+75’
+65’
+55’
+45’
+35’
+25’
+15’
+0’
+75’
+65’
+55’
+45’
+35’
+25’
+15’
+0’
+75’
+65’
+55’
+45’
+35’
+25’
+15’
+0’
CAMPBELL AVE.
BASCOM AVE.BARBANO AVE.
RESIDENTIAL
BLDG
HOTEL
BLDG
RESIDENTIAL
BLDG
CANNERY PLACE March 6, 2020 16
CORNER VIEW @ BASCOM AVE/CAMPBELL AVE
CANNERY PLACE March 6, 2020 17
VIEW FROM CAMPBELL AVE
CANNERY PLACE March 6, 2020 18
PLAZA VIEW
CANNERY PLACE March 6, 2020 19
PLAZA VIEW
CANNERY PLACE March 6, 2020 20
ROOF DECK VIEW