05-09-2023 - PC Agenda Packet
Planning Commission
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Tuesday, May 9, 2023 | 7:30 PM
City Hall Council Chamber – 70 N. First Street
CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL
This Planning Commission meeting will be conducted in person and virtually via video
teleconferencing (Zoom) in compliance with the provisions of the Brown Act. Members of the
public may attend this meeting in person at Campbell City Hall or virtually via Zoom at
https://campbellca.gov/PCSignup. The meeting will also be live streamed on Channel 26, the
City's website, and on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/@CityofCampbell.
Written correspondence will be accepted via email at planning@campbellca.gov until 5:00 PM
on the day of the meeting, and thereafter may be delivered in-person at the public hearing.
Written correspondence will be posted to the City’s website and distributed to the Planning
Commission. If you choose to email your comments, please indicate in the subject line “FOR
PUBLIC COMMENT” and indicate the item number.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Approval of Minutes of April 11, 2023, and April 25, 2023 (Roll Call Vote)
➢ Meeting Minutes, 4/11/2023 (Regular Meeting)
➢ Meeting Minutes, 4/25/2023 (Regular Meeting)
COMMUNICATIONS
AGENDA MODIFICATIONS OR POSTPONEMENTS
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This portion of the meeting is reserved for individuals wishing to address the Planning
Commission on matters of community concern that are not listed on the agenda. In the interest
of time, the Chair may limit speakers to five minutes. Please be aware that State law prohibits
the Commission from acting on non-agendized items, however, the Chair may refer matters to
staff for follow-up.
PUBLIC HEARING
Note: Members of the public may be allotted up to two (2) minutes to comment on any public
hearing item. Applicants/Appellants and their representatives may be allotted up to a total of
five (5) minutes for opening statements and up to a total of three (3) minutes maximum for
Planning Commission Agenda for May 9, 2023 Pg. 2
closing statements. Items requested/recommended for continuance are subject to Planning
Commission’s consent at the meeting.
2. PLN-2023-71 – 2024-2028 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
Public Hearing to consider the City of Campbell 2024-2028 Capital Improvement Plan
(CIP) for citywide projects for consistency with the Campbell General Plan. File No.: PLN-
2022-44. Staff is recommending that the project be deemed exempt under CEQA. Project
Planner: Daniel Fama, Senior Planner. Tentative City Council Meeting Date: May 16, 2023.
Recommended Action: Adopt a Resolution, finding that the proposed Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP) is consistent with the Campbell General Plan
3. PLN-2022-44 – 570 E. Hamilton Avenue (Resolution/Roll Call Vote)
Public Hearing to consider the request of AU Energy LLC for property located at 570 E.
Hamilton Avenue to allow reconstruction of a Shell service station with an expanded
convenience store including off-site alcohol beverage sales, a drive-through carwash, and
24-hour operational hours. The application under consideration includes a Conditional
Use Permit with Site and Architectural Review. File No.: PLN-2022-44. Staff is
recommending that this item be deemed Statutorily Exempt under CEQA. Planning
Commission action is final unless appealed in writing to the City Clerk within 10 calendar
days. Project Planner: Daniel Fama, Senior Planner
Recommended Action: Make a motion to continue consideration of this item to the
regular Planning Commission meeting of June 27, 2023.
REPORT OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
ADJOURNMENT
Adjourn to the Planning Commission meeting of May 23, 2023, at 7:30 PM, in the City Hall Council
Chambers, 70 North First Street, Campbell, California and via telecommunication.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, listening assistance devices are available
for meetings held in the Council Chambers. If you require accommodation to participate in the
meeting, please contact the City Clerk’s Office at ClerksOffice@campbellca.gov or 408-866-2117
in advance of the meeting.
CITY OF CAMPBELL
Planning Commission Minutes
7:30 P.M. TUESDAY
April 11, 2023
PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The Planning Commission regular meeting on Tuesday April 11, 2023, was called to
order at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 70 N. First Street, Campbell, CA,
by Chair Buchbinder and the following proceedings were had, to wit:
ROLL CALL
Commissioners Present: Chair: Adam Buchbinder
Vice Chair: Alan Zisser
Commissioner: Matt Kamkar
Commissioner: Michael Krey
Commissioner: Stuart Ching
Commissioner: Davis Fields
Commissioners Absent: Maggie Ostrowski
Staff Present:
Director: Rob Eastwood
City Attorney: Bill Seligmann
Senior Planner: Daniel Fama
Admin Analyst: Ken Ramirez
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
PC Special meeting – March 27, 2023
PC Regular Meeting – March 28, 2023
All approved with minor modification to pg. 31 of March 28, 2023 Regular meeting minutes.
Commissioner Ching abstained. Commissioner Ostrowski absent.
COMMUNICATIONS
Campbell Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – April 11, 2023 Page 2
Supplemental piece of information was provided by Vice Chair Zisser regarding Item 1.
AGENDA MODIFICATIONS OR POSTPONEMENTS
None
ORAL REQUESTS
This is the point on the agenda where members of the public may address the Commission
on items of concern to the Community that are not listed on the agenda this evening. People
may speak up to 5 minutes on any matter concerning the Commission.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Chair Buchbinder opened for public comment
Hearing none, Chair Buchbinder closed public comment.
Chair Buchbinder read Agenda Item No. 1 into the record as follows:
STUDY SESSION
1. PLN-2022-37 Study Session to consider the Preliminary Application request
of Robson Homes, LLC, for a 29-unit townhome housing
development project, for property located at 57-101 Gilman
Avenue & 60 Dillon Avenue. File No.: PLN-2023-37. Project
Planner: Daniel Fama, Senior Planner
Senior Planner Daniel Fama presented to consider the Preliminary Application request of
Robson Homes, LLC, for a 29-unit townhome housing development project.
Staff will be seeking HCD guidance on this project. Below is a preliminary analysis ,
highlighting the ways the project should proceed with change.
Campbell Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – April 11, 2023 Page 3
Commissioner Fields asked staff what and when they expected to hear from HCD
Director Eastwood clarified that HCD takes about a month to respond but will be
requesting a prompt response due to the SB330 application.
Commissioner Fields asked if they will be asking the applicant to change the garage and
driveway.
Senior Planner Fama clarified that the building is not easily redesigned and would require
significant changes to the site plan layout.
Commissioner Ching asked staff if they have elevations facing the street.
Senior Planner Fama clarified that he did not have elevations facing the street because
homes are inverted and the pictures displayed show the buildings facing the back.
Commissioner Krey received confirmation from staff that if HCD does state that SB330
cannot be used to lock in the density from the applicant then the City cannot approve the
project.
Commissioner Krey asked if the fire department had any issues and received
confirmation that there were no issues listed in the report from the Fire Department.
Commissioner Kamkar asked the townhomes can be configured as condos.
Senior Planner Fama clarified that condos are allowed to be constructed only in certain
zones.
Vice Chair Zisser asked if there is an alternative solution with a density bonus.
Senior Planner Fama stated that they have two paths to a resolution to this issue. They
can build an apartment building on the corner of the site or they could use density bonus
to seek a concession but the applicant may not interested in a density bonus.
Chair Buchbinder asked about maximum FAR allowed in the zoning district of the
proposed project.
Senior Planner Fama clarified that because the project is within a PD zoning district there
is no maximum FAR limit.
Chair Buchbinder asked how objective standards could be enforced if they make
construction infeasible.
Senior Planner Fama explained that applicant can seek waivers and concessions through
density bonus but if there is a clear, identifiable, adverse health and public safety impact it
could be enforced. The Dillon Avenue building certainly represents an adverse health and
public safety impact which is why vehicles are required to not back out into the street and
also require driveways to be separated in its traffic safety. Staff would oppose applicant
trying use concession for that configuration.
Campbell Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – April 11, 2023 Page 4
Commissioner Ching asked whether an increase to the density bonus by the applicant,
negate the city’s ability to deny based on health and safety reasons.
Senior Planner Fama explained that the health and safety exception to waivers or
concessions is the limited basis for the city to deny the request. The Dillon building is an
example of that as the driveways are very close to each other and very close to the
sidewalk.
City attorney clarified that exemption that Senior Planner Fama was alluding to is part of
the density bonus law.
Chair Buchbinder opened for Public Comment.
Applicant, Mark Robson, stated that a recent town home development helped subsidize a
podium development. Believes that the density that they are building is higher than what
is being proposed in the General Plan. Have been working on the project with the
assumption that the developed product is compatible with the neighborhood and what had
been built in the past within the neighborhood.
Applicant stated that they could change orientation of the building so that it faces the
street.
Applicant stated that they are maximizing the density of the project. Believe that it is
compatible with the neighborhood and can start development immediately with the
proposed recommendation. States that SB330 is about increasing residential unit
development and expediting the process. He has a plan to put 47 homes including ADUs
on the site without a podium. Does not believe that podium developments will help the city
meet its housing need because they are expensive and the geometry for the development
does not work.
Applicant wants to protect his rights and does not intend to change project unless he
absolutely has to. Has every intention to proceed with project as is.
Commissioner Krey asked applicant if they could build 51-68 units on site.
Applicant Mark Robson stated that it is not feasible based on the returns that they would
receive on that type of development.
Commissioner Krey recognized that the project started in 2016 and that laws often
changed and have changed since then, asked applicant what they would do if HCD does
not approve the SB-330 pre-application.
Applicant Mark Robson stated that they would continue to lease the buildings and not
build a project that loses money.
Commissioner Kamkar asked what would be the possibility of an apartment building
development on the Dillon project.
Campbell Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – April 11, 2023 Page 5
Applicant Mark Robson stated that part of their solution was to replace 4 units with 10
units on that side of the project. Total number of units built with not be exactly be 51 units
but the 47 units built would count toward the city’s RHNA numbers. Concrete podiums on
sites like this don’t work. On a 27 unit development only 4 units would be BMR.
Vice Chair Zisser asked if the proposed ADUs be attached ADUs.
Applicant Mark Robson stated that the ground floor units would be attached ADUs and
that 12 of the for sale units would have ADUs.
Commissioner Fields asked applicant what he would be willing to do and would like to
happen.
Applicant Mark Robson stated that they can meet requirements. Will build more
affordable units, use density bonuses, flip the building around, and meet the setbacks.
Delayed housing is denied housing.
Chair Buchbinder asked if it would be possible for applicant to go with a community
benefit project at 47 units.
Senior Planner Fama clarified that applicant is able to do so under the new General Plan
and not applicable under current situation. Materials presented are the formal application
under SB330. Other things discussed have not been formalized yet. Applicant can submit
a formal application with an increased unit count. The new General Plan demands more
unit production than what the applicant wants to do.
Commissioner Krey asked staff to clarify what they would need to be approved absent
HCD issue.
Senior Planner Fama specified that they still need to comply with any objective standards
or apply for a density bonus and seek waivers and concessions as appropriate. Minimally
would need at least one concession to allow townhomes to be built on that one the parcel
within the East Campbell Avenue Master Plan
Chair Buchinder Closed public comment.
Commissioner Fields is sympathetic to increasing the number of homes on the property.
Somewhat torn. Would like to know what other alternatives look like.
Commissioner Ching is also torn. Understands that under the new General Plan the
density would be 51-68 units to sites.
Senior Planner Fama clarified that when the applicant mentions a 47 unit count he is
including ADUs as part of that number, ADUs are not units as density counts.
Commissioner Ching clarified that with a 10-unit apartment building development it would
bring the unit count to 35 units in total.
Senior Planner Fama stated that concessions would need to be had in several areas for
Campbell Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – April 11, 2023 Page 6
project to be approved.
Commissioner Ching stated that he would be okay with applicant's plan and the
development of a 10-unit apartment development with approved concessions for ADUs.
Senior Planner Fama stated that state law gives applicant 6-months to apply for formal
application so 4 months left.
Commissioner Krey wished that HCD questions were already settled. Struck by applicant
saying that at the end it is about providing housing. Trying to add it add up. Appreciates
that the applicant is wanting to develop immediately. Would like to hold for the most units
and be convinced by other developers that this is the most amount of units that can be
built on this project site.
Commissioner Kamkar also stated being conflicted. Appreciates the quality developments
from the applicant but believes that if we start discounting unit counts we will never meet
the RHNA target numbers. Need to shoot for higher unit counts than what is being
proposed. That is the paramount issue.
Vice Chair Zisser stated that issue at hand is complicated and is conflicted. Believes that
the applicant would fix problems if the project would go ahead. Would be in favor of
flipping Dillon so that the project complies with requirements. It is unknown when HCD will
respond and the outcome of their response. Leaning towards developing sooner rather
than later. The project area is under the old density, project fits with the rest of the street.
In favor of housing production being developed in the immediate future rather than a
higher housing production being developed in the distant future. Believes that the city has
several other parcels that will help the city meet production needs.
Chair Buchbinder stated that if we wanted standards to be different then we should have
done it sooner. Understands that 47 units is the best that we can do currently. Stated that
it seems like a bad idea opposing the developer for the development of 4 extra units.
Sees that the project is really close to making the density happen.
Commissioners Ching and Kamkar supported comments of Chair Buchbinder
Chair Buchbinder closed the study session.
REPORT OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
Director Eastwood communicated the following.
1. City Council special meeting will review recommendations from Planning Commission
for General Plan, Housing Element, MFDDS, EIR, and zoning code updates on April
18, 2023 at 4:00pm.
2. Climate action and adaptation plan grant submitted with staff assistance from Public
Works and Community Development.
ADJOURNMENT
Campbell Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – April 11, 2023 Page 7
The Planning Commission regular meeting adjourned at 8:45p.m. to the next Regular
Planning Commission Meeting on Tuesday, April 25, 2023, at City Hall, Council
Chambers, 70 N. First Street, Campbell, CA.
SUBMITTED BY: ______________________________________
Ken Ramirez, Administrative Analyst
APPROVED BY: ______________________________________
Adam Buchbinder, Chair
ATTEST: ______________________________________
Rob Eastwood, Secretary
CITY OF CAMPBELL
Planning Commission Minutes
7:30 P.M. TUESDAY
April 25, 2023
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The Planning Commission regular meeting on Tuesday April 25, 2023, was called to
order at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 70 N. First Street, Campbell, CA,
by Chair Buchbinder and the following proceedings were had, to wit:
ROLL CALL
Commissioners Present: Chair: Adam Buchbinder
Vice Chair: Alan Zisser
Commissioner: Matt Kamkar
Commissioner: Michael Krey
Commissioner: Maggie Ostrowski
Commissioner: Stuart Ching
Commissioner: Davis Fields
Commissioners Absent: None
Board Members Absent: None
Staff Present:
Director: Rob Eastwood
City Attorney: Bill Seligmann
Senior Planner: Stephen Rose
Senior Planner: Daniel Fama
Associate Planner: Tracy Tam
Admin Analyst: Ken Ramirez
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
April 11, 2023 Meeting Minutes will be reviewed for approval May 9, 2023
Campbell Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – April 25, 2023 Page 2
COMMUNICATIONS
Supplemental piece of information was provided by Vice Chair Zisser regarding Item 1.
AGENDA MODIFICATIONS OR POSTPONEMENTS
Item No. 2 is requesting that it be continued.
ORAL REQUESTS
This is the point on the agenda where members of the public may address the Commission
on items of concern to the Community that are not listed on the agenda this evening. People
may speak up to 5 minutes on any matter concerning the Commission.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Chair Buchbinder opened for public comment
Hearing none, Chair Buchbinder closed public comment.
Chair Buchbinder read Agenda Item No. 1 into the record as follows:
Krey and Zisser visited all sites.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Item was read 1st as item was requested as continuance.
1. PLN-2021-43 Public Hearing to consider the request of Jake Hamilton of
Virtual Site Walk LCC, on behalf of Crown Castle, to allow
for the establishment of a concealed wireless
telecommunications facility (faux tree pole) with a request
for a limited exemption standards to retain the existing
height of the facility (45-feet permitted; 75-feet
existing/requested) on property located at 910 S.
McGlincy Lane. The application under consideration is a
Conditional Use Permit with Site and Architectural Review.
File No.: PLN-2021-43. Staff is recommending that this
item be deemed Categorically Exempt under CEQA.
Project Planner: Stephen Rose, Senior Planner
Senior Planner Rose briefly presented the item where applicant is requesting the
establishment of a concealed wireless telecommunications facility (faux tree pole) with
a request for a limited exemption standards to retain the existing height of the facility
(45-feet permitted; 75-feet existing/requested) on property located at 910 S. McGlincy
Lane.
Campbell Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – April 25, 2023 Page 3
Planning Commissioners asked why the item was continued
Senior Planner Rose clarified that the applicant wanted more time to review and
address the recommended conditions of approval.
Motion: Upon motion by Commissioner Krey, seconded by Commissioner
Kamkar, the Planning Commission moved to continue item to a
later date for the Planning Commission to consider
recommendation that the City allow the establishment of a
concealed wireless telecommunications facility (faux tree pole) with
a request for a limited exemption standards to retain the existing
height of the facility (45-feet permitted; 75-feet existing/requested)
on property located at 910 S. McGlincy Lane. File No.: PLN-2021-43.,
by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Fields, Ching, Ostrowski, Krey, Buchbinder, Kamkar,
Zisser
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
2. PLN-2022-123 Public Hearing to consider the request of Northwest Signs,
on behalf of Oddwalle Campbell LLC, for a Sign Permit to
allow for one additional wall sign totaling approximately 37
square feet on property located at 30 S. 1st Street. The
application under consideration is a Sign Permit. File No.:
PLN-2022-123. Staff is recommending that this item be
deemed Categorically Exempt under CEQA. Project
Planner: Tracy Tam, Associate Planner
Associate Planner Tracy Tam presented staff report to consider the request of
Northwest Signs, on behalf of Oddwalle Campbell LLC, for a Sign Permit to allow for
one additional wall sign totaling approximately 37 square feet on property located at 30
S. 1st Street. Staff read finding #2 into the record.
Commissioner Krey questioned on whether corner signs were allowed in the past for
business facing the city parking lot, Staff stated that A Bellagio was approved to have
two wall signs and the request for two wall signs did not result in many requests for
additional signage. Commissioner Zisser had clarifying questions whether the scale of
the wall signs were appropriate for the scale of the building façade in which the sign
would occupy. Both staff and the applicant stated that the proposed wall signs were in
scale of the building façade in which the sign would occupy.
Planning Commissioners were in favor of applicant’s proposal.
Campbell Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – April 25, 2023 Page 4
Motion: Upon motion by Commissioner Ostrowski, seconded by
Commissioner Zisser, the Planning Commission adopted
Resolution No. 4675 allowing for a Sign Permit to allow for one
additional wall sign totaling approximately 37 square feet on
property located at 30 S. 1st Street. The application under
consideration is a Sign Permit. File No.: PLN-2022-123., by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Fields, Ostrowski, Krey, Buchbinder, Kamkar, Zisser,
Ching
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
3. PLN-2022-158 Public Hearing to consider the request of Loretz
Construction, Inc. on behalf of David M. Foulkes, Trustee,
for a Zoning Exception to allow an approximately 666
square-foot expansion (inclusive of a 557 square-foot
garage addition and 109 square-foot living area addition) of
an existing accessory dwelling unit ("carriage house")
previously approved by a Conditional Use Permit (UP 96-
04), on a Landmark Property listed on the Campbell
Historic Resource Inventory (HRI), commonly known as the
Littleton-Martin House, located at 1690 Littleton Place in
the R-1-9-H (Single-Family Residential / Historic Overlay)
Combining Zoning District, including exceedance of the
maximum allowable size for an accessory dwelling unit, an
exception to the expansion prohibition for legal non-
conforming structures, and exceptions to the special
provisions for accessory dwelling units located on historic
properties. File No.: PLN-2022-158. Staff is recommending
that this item be deemed Categorically Exempt under
CEQA. Tentative City Council Date: May 16, 2023. Project
Planner: Daniel Fama, Senior Planner
Senior Planner Fama presented staff report to consider the request of Loretz
Construction, Inc. on behalf of David M. Foulkes, Trustee, for a Zoning Exception to
allow an approximately 666 square-foot expansion (inclusive of a 557 square-foot
garage addition and 109 square-foot living area addition) of an existing accessory
dwelling unit ("carriage house").
Planning Commissioners asked where the house is oriented inversely.
Senior Planner Fama clarified that the front of the house faces inward.
Applicant Mike Foulkes stated House was originally uninhabitable since 2011 and he spent
considerable effort renovating the interior and exterior of the structure . Second phase is the
Campbell Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – April 25, 2023 Page 5
renovation carriage house. The proposed addition was specifically designed for the two cars
from the 1960s. Carriage house has been an occupied residence where his mother lives.
Planning Commissioner expressed concerned about lost trees as part of proposed
expansion.
Applicant confirmed that he will not be cutting down protected trees if he can avoid it
Neighbor from behind property spoke, said that he was here in 1996 when the carriage house
was moved onto the property. Frustrated due to being told that nothing could be built and now
hearing that a lot can be built. Frustrated with inconsistencies from the City.
Chair Buchbinder commented that many rules governing ADUs have changed from 1996.
Planning Commissioners in favor and support the project.
Motion: Upon motion by Commissioner Ching, seconded by Commissioner
Fields, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 4668
recommending that the approval of a zoning exception to allow an
approximately 666 square-foot expansion (inclusive of a 557 square-
foot garage addition and 109 square-foot living area addition) of an
existing accessory dwelling unit (“Carriage House”) previously
approved by a conditional use permit (UP-96-04), on a landmark
property listed on the Campbell Historic Resource Inventory (HRI),
commonly known as the Littleton-Martin house, located at 1690
Littleton Place in the R-1-9-H (Single-Family Residential / Historic
Overlay / Combining zoning district, including exceedance of the
maximum allowable size for an accessory dwelling unit, an exception
to the expansion prohibition for legal non-conforming structures, and
exceptions to the special provisions for accessory dwelling units
located on the Historic Properties. File No.: PLN-2022-158, by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Fields, Ching, Ostrowski, Krey, Buchbinder, Kamkar,
Zisser
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
STUDY SESSION
4. PLN-2023-43 Study Session to consider the preliminary request of Granite
Ridge Properties for property located at 44 & 56 Sunnyside
Avenue for a 6-unit "small lot" detached single-family
residential development. The application under consideration
is a Preliminary Application. File No.: PLN-2023-43. Project
Planner: Daniel Fama, Senior Planner
Campbell Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – April 25, 2023 Page 6
Senior Planner Daniel Fama presented staff report to consider the preliminary request of
Granite Ridge Properties for property located at 44 & 56 Sunnyside Avenue for a 6-unit
"small lot" detached single-family residential development.
Planning Commissioner asked what of the project can be influenced by
recommendations.
Senior Planner Fama clarified that nothing significant can be influenced but minor
changes can be recommended, such as window placement and sizes..
Planning Commissioners asked whether developers locking in old standards with
proposed projects indicates that we have made it harder for developers to develop.
Senior Planner Fama clarified that new standards are more predictable and all efforts
have been to try to create a balance between developer desires and impacts to the
community.
Director Eastwood stated that it may be a challenge for developers to retrain on the new
and upcoming standards and it may be simpler just to lock in what they have.
Applicant Lance Crannell stated that they were open to questions and hearing everyone’s
perspectives.
Commissioner Ching addressed concerns from neighbors regarding the height of the
development with the applicant.
Applicant Lance Crannell stated that this was not the only three story project in the
neighborhood and vicinity
Commissioner Fields asked the applicant if they were open to doing something about
concerns and viewability?
Applicant Lance Crannell stated to being open to everyone’s input.
Commissioner Krey asked if they are considering making all units ADU ready?
Sachneel Patel stated that many of their single-family home projects are ADU ready
product.
Vice Chair Zisser asked applicant what was the rationale in not having an HOA the
inclusion of the easement.
Sachneel Patel stated that it would be difficult to get everyone onboard with new project
and felt that this was best for the project.
Chair – is there sidewalk on private street?
Chair Buchbinder opened public comment on item.
Campbell Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – April 25, 2023 Page 7
John Milinovich – speaking for 72 Sunnyside neighbors. Spoke on the following:
• Introduction of neighbors impacted.
• Shared project concerns
• Greatly minimized sunlight as a result of the project
• Reduced privacy for young families
• Obstruction of mountain and sunset views.
Tommy Phillips – owner of California wheels, wants to make sure that new residents
aren’t concerned or upset of regarding his business operations.
Chair Buchbinder closed public comment on hearing.
Commissioner discussion.
Commissioner Krey stated that projects meets all laws and rules and helps with quest for
more housing.
Commissioner Kamkar acknowledges that environment may change from the time that
homes are bought. Encourages developer to work with neighbors to gain support.
Vice Chair Zisser understands the concerns from neighbors but developers have the
bottom line and 3-stories are common. Not sure how much can be done when laws are in
place to further housing in the state. Encourage developer to work with neighbor on
reasonable solutions.
Commissioner Fields would like to see something regarding tree placement, fence height,
and frosted window solutions to address neighbor concerns in plan.
Commissioner Ching stated that the neighbor raises good point and acknowledged 3-stories
may be a “bit of a push” and may impact the neighbor. Lots 5&6 would probably impact the
neighbors the most. Understands the sensitivity to adjacency concerns. Hopes that the
developer is sensitive to needs of neighbors and their feedback.
Commissioner Ostrowski acknowledged the insightful presentation from the neighbor and
their concerns. Encourages developer to have conversations with neighbor. Looking forward
to seeing plans that take discussions into consideration.
Chair Buchbinder sympathizes with business and owner concerns. Understands that PD
zoning makes this unpredictable. Hope developer takes city’s advise on common ownership.
Hope that they help put sidewalks for walking. If applicant can't put ADUs on the outside hope
they make space for them in the inside.
Chair Buchbinder closed study session.
Campbell Planning Commission Meeting Minutes – April 25, 2023 Page 8
REPORT OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
1. City Council adopted Housing Element, General Plan, Zoning Update, MFDDS and
EIR. First City in county with a certified Housing Element. Department will send
Housing Element to HCD . New rules and policies will be effective June 1st, 2023.
Chair Buchbinder created Declaration of Shelter Crisis subcommittee and appointed
Commissioner Zisser and Commissioner Krey to Declaration of Shelter Crisis subcommittee.
ADJOURNMENT
The Planning Commission regular meeting adjourned at 8:45p.m. to the next Regular
Planning Commission Meeting on Tuesday, May 9, 2023, at City Hall, Council
Chambers, 70 N. First Street, Campbell, CA.
SUBMITTED BY: ______________________________________
Ken Ramirez, Administrative Analyst
APPROVED BY: ______________________________________
Adam Buchbinder, Chair
ATTEST: ______________________________________
Rob Eastwood, Secretary
ITEM NO. 2
I
T
E
M
CITY OF CAMPBELL ∙ PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report ∙ May 9, 2023
CIP - General Plan
Consistency
Public Hearing to consider the City of Campbell 2024-2028 Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP) for citywide projects for consistency with
the Campbell General Plan. File No.: PLN-2022-44.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission take the following action:
1. Adopt a Resolution (reference Attachment 1), finding that the proposed Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP) is consistent with the Campbell General Plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council that the adoption
of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is exempt from the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the CIP is not a "project" as defined by Public
Resources Code §21065. CEQA specifically excludes organizational or administrative activities
of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical change in the environment pursuant
to CEQA Guidelines §15378. However, individual projects contained within the CIP will be
subject to environmental review under CEQA prior to final approval by the City Council.
DISCUSSION
Capital Improvement Plan: Each year, the City prepares a rolling 5-year Capital Improvement Plan
(CIP) for physical and operational infrastructure improvements, including public facilities such
roadways, public parks, and Civic Center and Community Center facilities. The City uses the CIP
to project future capital needs, determine financial resources, and to schedule implementation.
Expenditures of $25,000 or more must be included in the CIP, while expenditures under that
amount are included in annual departmental operating budgets. The first year of the 5-year CIP is
incorporated into the City’s annual budget.
Scope of Review: Government Code Section 65103(c) and 65403(c) requires the City’s "planning
agency" to annually review its Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for its consistency with the
Campbell General Plan and any applicable specific plans prior to its adoption. As such, the
Planning Commission’s purview is limited to evaluating General Plan consistency. The
Commission should, therefore, refrain from discussing the merits of any particular project(s)
contained within the CIP.
New CIP Projects: The proposed FY 2024-28 CIP totals $95,174,079 and would fund 82 projects,
18 of which are new. The remaining projects have been previously approved and/or are proposed
to have their apportions revised or their funding period modified, as listed in Attachment 2. The
following table lists the new CIP projects and their funding source, which may include the Capital
Improvement Plan Reserve (CIPR), Parkland Dedication Fund, grants, private funds, development
impact fees, construction tax revenue, environmental services fee revenue, and bond issuance (debt
obligation). New projects are further described in the Project Summary Sheets (Attachment 3).
Staff Report – Planning Commission Meeting of May 9, 2023 Page 2 of 3
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 2024-2028
New Capital Projects Total Budget Funding Period Source of Funds
Accessibility Ramps - FY28 $ 50,000 FY2028 Construction Tax
ADA Transition Plan - FY28 50,000 FY2028 CIPR
Annual Street Maintenance - FY28 2,989,000 FY2028 CIPR/SB1/Grants/VIF
Bike/Ped & Traffic Safety Impr - FY28 65,000 FY2028 Construction Tax/Grants
CCC - Building A HVAC Controls 85,000 FY2024 CIPR
CCC - Building A Sewer Line Replacement 135,000 FY2024 - FY2026 CIPR
CCC - Building M Roof Replacement 400,000 FY2024 CIPR
CCC & Corp Yard Roof Replacements 2,302,700 FY2024 - FY2028 CIPR
City Hall - HVAC Chiller Replacement 150,000 FY2024 CIPR
City Hall Public Counters and Accessibility Impr 220,000 FY2024 CIPR
Community Center Skate Park Renovation 220,000 FY2024 Park Fees
East Campbell Ave Plan Line 200,000 FY2028 CIPR
Los Gatos Creek County Park - Dog Park Reno 320,000 FY2026 Park Fees
Measure B Bike/Ped Educ & Enco - FY24 thru FY25 80,000 FY2024 - FY2025 Grants
Measure B Bike/Ped Educ & Enco - FY26 thru FY27 80,000 FY2026 - FY2027 Grants
Measure B Bike/Ped Educ & Enco - FY28 40,000 FY2028 Grants
Sidewalk, Curb & Gutter Impr - FY28 75,000 FY2028 Construction Tax
Traffic Calming Improvements - FY24 50,000 FY2024 Construction Tax
Virginia Park Landscape Improvements 110,000 FY2026 Park Fees
Consistency with the General Plan: Staff has reviewed the new capital projects, referenced above,
and identified the applicable General Plan policies and strategies, as summarized in the table,
below. The policies and strategies cited are excerpted in Attachment 4 for the Planning
Commission’s reference. Based on this analysis, staff recommends that the Planning Commission
find that the 2024-2028 CIP is consistent with the Campbell General Plan. This will be the last
review under the 2001 General Plan. Next year's review will be performed under the 2023-2040
"Envision Campbell" General Plan.
New Capital Projects
Applicable General Plan Policies and Strategies
Policies Strategies
Accessibility Ramps - FY28 LUT-11.1 LUT-2.1h; LUT-11.1g; OSP-6.2d ADA Transition Plan - FY28
Annual Street Maintenance - FY28 LUT-7.1 LUT-7.1b
Bike/Ped & Traffic Safety Impr - FY28 LUT-7.1; LUT-7.2 LUT 1.3d; LUT-2.1b; LUT-2.1h; LUT-2.1i; LUT-7.2j
CCC - Building A HVAC Controls
OSP-6.2 OSP-6.2b
CCC - Building A Sewer Line Replacement
CCC - Building M Roof Replacement
CCC & Corp Yard Roof Replacements
City Hall - HVAC Chiller Replacement
City Hall Public Counters and Accessibility Impr LUT-11.1 OSP-6.1d
Community Center Skate Park Renovation OSP-2.2; OSP-6.3; OSP-2.2b; OSP-3.2a; OSP-6.3a
East Campbell Ave Plan Line LU-6.1 LU-6.1a
Los Gatos Creek County Park - Dog Park Reno OSP-1.1; OSP-2.2; OSP-6.3; LUT-2.1 LUT-2.1b; OSP-1.1a; OSP-2.2b; OSP-3.2a; OSP-6.3a
Measure B Bike/Ped Educ & Enco - FY24 thru FY25
LUT-7.3 LUT-2.1r Measure B Bike/Ped Educ & Enco - FY26 thru FY27
Measure B Bike/Ped Educ & Enco - FY28
Sidewalk, Curb & Gutter Impr - FY28 LUT-7.2 LUT-2.1i
Traffic Calming Improvements - FY24 LUT-2.1; LUT-7.2 LUT-2.1b; LUT-2.1h; LUT-2.1i; LUT-7.2j
Virginia Park Landscape Improvements OSP-1.1; OSP-2.2; OSP-6.3 OSP-2.2b; OSP-3.2a; OSP-6.3a
Staff Report – Planning Commission Meeting of May 9, 2023 Page 3 of 3
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 2024-2028
Attachment:
1. Draft Resolution
2. Draft FY2024-2028 CIP
3. Project Summary Sheets
4. General Plan Policies and Strategies
Prepared by: ____________________________________
Daniel Fama, Senior Planner
Prepared by: ____________________________________
Norite Vong, Finance Manager
Approved by: __________________________________________
Rob Eastwood, Community Development Director
RESOLUTION NO. 467_
BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CAMPBELL DETERMINING THAT THE CITY OF CAMPBELL
2024-2028 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN (CIP) IS CONSISTENT
WITH THE CAMPBELL GENERAL PLAN.
After notification and public hearing, as specified by law and after presentation by the
Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed.
The Planning Commission finds as follows with regards to the City of Campbell 2024-2028
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP):
1. Government Code Section 65103(c) and 65403(c) requires the City’s "planning agency"
to annually review its Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for its consistency with the City’s
General Plan and any applicable specific plans at least 60 days prior to its adoption.
2. Campbell Municipal Code Section 21.54.020 specifies that the Planning Commission,
amongst other organs of the City, constitute the City’s "planning agency," as defined by
Government Code Section 65100.
3. The City of Campbell does not have any adopted specific plans as defined by California
Government Code Sec. 65451.
4. The Planning Commission has reviewed the identified projects and appropriations that
constitute the proposed 2024-2028 Capital Improvement Plan, as contained within the
administrative record.
5. The Planning Commission found that the new projects and appropriations identified in the
proposed 2024-2028 Capital Improvement Plan further and/or are supported by the
following General Plan Policies and Strategies:
Land Use and Transportation
Policy LUT-1.2: Regional Land Use and Transportation Planning: Promote integrated and
coordinated regional land use and transportation planning.
Policy LUT-1.4: Regional Traffic Management: Lead and participate in initiatives and functions to
manage regional traffic and to reduce congestion on area roadways.
Strategy LUT-1.3d: Regional Off-Road Bicycle and Pedestrian Paths: Cooperate with surrounding
communities and other agencies to establish and maintain off-road bicycle and
pedestrian paths and trails utilizing creek, utility, and railroad right-of-way that are
safe, convenient and visible for commuting and recreational use.
Policy LUT-2.1: Multi-modal Transportation: Develop and implement a multi-modal transportation
network that balance transportation options aimed at reducing automobile traffic
and greenhouse gas emissions while promoting healthier travel alternatives for all
users
Strategy LUT-2.1b: Bicycle Plan Implementation: Use the development review process and the Capital
Improvement Program to identify opportunities to implement bicycle connections,
parking, storage and other related improvements.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 467_ Page 2
2024-2028 CIP - General Plan Consistency
Strategy LUT-2.1h: Pedestrian Plan: Develop and implement a pedestrian plan that is safe, convenient
and functional creating a network connecting neighborhoods with services,
recreation, transit and employment centers and consistent with the City’s ADA
Implementation Plan.
Strategy LUT-2.1i: Street Design and Improvements: Design streets and sidewalks so as to provide a
comfortable, accessible and safe pedestrian experience.
Strategy LUT-2.1r: Safe Routes to Schools: Promote and support Safe Routes to Schools policies and
programs for all schools serving Campbell including safe and convenient walking
and bicycle connections.
Policy LUT-2.3: Roadway and Intersection Disruption Minimization: Minimize traffic disruptions
along arterial roadways and major intersections.
Strategy LUT-2.3a: Intersection Level of Service: To the extent possible, maintain level of service (LOS)
on designated intersections consistent with the Santa Clara County Congestion
Management Plan.
Street Appearance and Public Improvements
Policy LUT-7.1: Road Maintenance: Maintain and repair roads.
Strategy LUT-7.1b: Roadway Repair and Maintenance: Conduct roadway repair and routine
maintenance as necessary.
Policy LUT-7.2: Public Utilities and Improvements: Provide a comprehensive network of sidewalks,
public utilities and multi-modal improvements that are safe, attractive, efficient, well
maintained and accessible for pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists.
Strategy LUT-7.2j: Sidewalks: Inventory sidewalks and develop a program to address filling the gaps.
Design sidewalks that are separated from the automobile travel way, on arterial
streets. Sidewalks along other streets should be consistent with the neighborhood.
Policy LUT-7.3 Transportation Safety: Make safety a priority of citywide transportation design and
planning.
Strategy LUT-7.3a: Intersection Design: Incorporate pedestrian and bicycle features and auto safety
components in intersection design and improvement projects, such as curb cuts to
accommodate bicycle trailers, bicycle crossing buttons at traffic signals,
appropriately designed bulb-outs to shorten pedestrian crossings but still facilitating
bicyclists, and bicycle sensors at major intersections. Develop a comprehensive
policy incorporating strategies that facilitate the movement of pedestrians and
bicyclists through intersections that includes periodic safety risk evaluations and
corresponding safety measures.
Amenities, Open Space and Community Linkages
Policy LUT-11.1: Physically Connected Transportation Infrastructure: Strive to achieve physically
connected transportation infrastructure.
Strategy LUT-11.1g: Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Address the needs of people with disabilities
and comply with the requirements of the ADA during the planning and
implementation of transportation and parking improvement projects.
Open Space, Parks and Recreation Facilities
Planning Commission Resolution No. 467_ Page 3
2024-2028 CIP - General Plan Consistency
Policy OSP-1.1: Regional Open Space, Parks and Recreation Facilities: Support efforts to enhance,
enlarge and provide public access to regional open space, parks and recreation
facilities to meet the needs of Campbell residents.
Strategy OSP-1.1a: Santa Clara County Parks and Trails: Work with Santa Clara County and the Santa
Clara Valley Water District to renovate and improve access to the Los Gatos Creek
Trail and Los Gatos County Park,
Policy OSP-2.2: Maintain and Renovate Existing Open Space, Park and Recreation Facilities:
Maintain and renovate existing open space, park and recreation facilities to improve
their usefulness, safety and appearance.
Strategy OSP-2.2b: Park Improvement Budget: Coordinate the budget for park improvement projects
with the development of the Capital Improvement Plan.
Strategy OSP-3.2a: Park Impact Fees: Utilize park impact fees for the acquisition and development of
parks and recreation facilities.
Policy OSP-9.2: NPDES: Comply with the federal Clean Water Act requirements for National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits
Strategy OSP-9.2a: Storm Water Management Plan: Work with the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff
Pollution Prevention Program to implement the Storm Water Management Plan.
Strategy OSP-9.2b: West Valley Clean Water Program: Implement the Work Plan for the West Valley
Cities, including implementing Campbell’s Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
and Best Management Practices.
Public Facilities and Services
Policy OSP-6.2: Community Facilities: Ensure functional, attractive and well-maintained community
facilities that serve Campbell’s residents.
Strategy OSP-6.2a: New or Renovated Facilities: Design, construct or renovate facilities to ensure
adaptability for changing community needs and on-going use.
Strategy OSP-6.2b: Aging Facilities: Renovate and modernize aging facilities to improve their
usefulness and appearance and to maximize their potential life and avoid the high
cost of deferred maintenance.
Strategy OSP-6.2d: Accessible Facilities: Modernize City facilities to provide full accessibility to all
residents and visitors, including those with disabilities.
Policy OSP-6.3: Public Spaces and Amenities for Community Gatherings: Ensure safe, convenient
and attractive public spaces and amenities for community gatherings and activities.
Strategy OSP-6.3a: Features and Maintenance of Public Spaces and Amenities: Encourage community
gatherings and individual use of public spaces and amenities by providing attractive
landscaping, outdoor furniture, recycling and trash facilities and adequate
maintenance of the facilities.
Historic Resources
Policy CNR-1.1: Historic Resource Preservation: Ensure that the City and its citizens preserve
historic resources as much as possible.
Policy LUT-8-1: Historic Buildings, Landmarks and Districts and Cultural Resources: Preserve,
rehabilitate or restore the City’s historic buildings, landmarks, districts and cultural
Planning Commission Resolution No. 467_ Page 4
2024-2028 CIP - General Plan Consistency
resources and retain the architectural integrity of established building patterns
within historic residential neighborhoods to preserve the cultural heritage of the
community.
Strategy LUT-8.1j: Heritage Theater: Support efforts to restore the Heritage Theater.
Strategy CNR-2.1b: Historic Amenities: Use amenities such as signs and historical lighting in key public
access areas. Consider incorporating public art to reflect historical elements.
Downtown Development Plan
Policy CPT-3.1: Adequate Parking: Encourage the joint utilization of parking.
Strategy CPT-3.1b: Develop a plan with the property/business owners to develop a parking
management plan to maximize the use of existing parking…
Strategy CPT-1.1d: Pedestrian connections shall be enhanced between the downtown and the
Community Center on the west and the Los Gatos Creek Trail/Pruneyard Shopping
Center on the east.
Strategy LU-4.1a The historic character of Downtown shall be preserved through the protection and
restoration of its historic buildings and landmarks.
Based on the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further finds and concludes
that:
1. In accordance with Sections 65103(c) and 65403(c) of the California Government Code,
the Planning Commission, in light of the whole record before it, including but not limited to
the Community Development Director’s report and all documents incorporated by
reference therein, and the City’s General Plan, that the proposed 2024-2028 Campbell
Improvement Plan as a whole is consistent with the Campbell General Plan, however,
noting that the amount of funding for bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure is insufficient to
comply with the requirements of the General Plan.
2. Adoption of the Capital Improvement Plan is exempt from the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the CIP is not a “project” as defined by Public
Resources Code §21065. CEQA also specifically excludes organizational or
administrative activities of government that will not result in direct or indirect physical
change in the environment pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §15378.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of May, 2023, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners:
NOES: Commissioners:
ABSENT: Commissioners:
ABSTAIN: Commissioners:
APPROVED:
Alan Zisser, Acting Chair
ATTEST:
Rob Eastwood, Secretary
Capital Improvement Plan
FY 2024 Through FY 2028
New Capital Projects Total Budget Funding Period Source of Funds
Accessibility Ramps - FY28 50,000$ FY2028 Construction Tax
ADA Transition Plan - FY28 50,000 FY2028 CIPR
Annual Street Maintenance - FY28 2,989,000 FY2028 CIPR/SB1/Grants/VIF
Bike/Ped & Traffic Safety Impr - FY28 65,000 FY2028 Construction Tax/Grants
CCC - Building A HVAC Controls 85,000 FY2024 CIPR
CCC - Building A Sewer Line Replacement 135,000 FY2024 - FY2026 CIPR
CCC - Building M Roof Replacement 400,000 FY2024 CIPR
CCC & Corp Yard Roof Replacements 2,302,700 FY2024 - FY2028 CIPR
City Hall - HVAC Chiller Replacement 150,000 FY2024 CIPR
City Hall Public Counters and Accessibility Impr 220,000 FY2024 CIPR
Community Center Skate Park Renovation 220,000 FY2024 Park Fees
East Campbell Ave Plan Line 200,000 FY2028 CIPR
Los Gatos Creek County Park - Dog Park Reno 320,000 FY2026 Park Fees
Measure B Bike/Ped Educ & Enco - FY24 thru FY25 80,000 FY2024 - FY2025 Grants
Measure B Bike/Ped Educ & Enco - FY26 thru FY27 80,000 FY2026 - FY2027 Grants
Measure B Bike/Ped Educ & Enco - FY28 40,000 FY2028 Grants
Sidewalk, Curb & Gutter Impr - FY28 75,000 FY2028 Construction Tax
Traffic Calming Improvements - FY24 50,000 FY2024 Construction Tax
Virginia Park Landscape Improvements 110,000 FY2026 Park Fees
Sub-Total 7,621,700$
Change to Appropriations Total Budget Funding Period Source of Funds
Annual Street Maintenance - FY23 thru FY26 (increased by $2.989M)12,813,218$ FY2023 - FY2026 Carryover - CIPR/SB1/Grants/VIF
Annual Street Maintenance - FY27 (increased by $200,000)2,989,000 FY2027 CIPR/SB1/Grants/VIF
Sidewalk, Curb & Gutter Impr - FY24 (increased by $100,000)175,000 FY2024 Construction Tax
Sub-Total 15,977,218$
Change to Funding Period Total Budget Funding Period Source of Funds
Campbell Avenue and Page Street Traffic Sig (moved from FY2024 to FY2025)332,000$ FY2025 Developer Fees
Parking Guidance System (moved from FY2024 to FY2025)230,000 FY2025 Developer Fees
Sub-Total 562,000$
Existing Projects Total Budget Funding Period Source of Funds
Accessibility Ramps - FY23 50,000$ Carryover - Construction Tax
Accessibility Ramps - FY24 50,000 FY2024 Construction Tax
Accessibility Ramps - FY25 50,000 FY2025 Construction Tax
Accessibility Ramps - FY26 50,000 FY2026 Construction Tax
Accessibility Ramps - FY27 50,000 FY2027 Construction Tax
ADA Transition Plan - FY22 50,000 Carryover - CIPR
ADA Transition Plan - FY23 50,000 Carryover - CIPR
ADA Transition Plan - FY24 50,000 FY2024 CIPR
ADA Transition Plan - FY25 50,000 FY2025 CIPR
ADA Transition Plan - FY26 50,000 FY2026 CIPR
ADA Transition Plan - FY27 50,000 FY2027 CIPR
Ainsley House Roof & Foundation Assess 120,000 Carryover - CIPR
Armored Rescue Vehicle 312,236 FY2024 - FY2026 Carryover - CIPR
Bike/Ped & Traffic Safety Impr - FY21 16,091 Carryover - Construction Tax/Grants
Bike/Ped & Traffic Safety Impr - FY22 25,000 Carryover - Construction Tax
Bike/Ped & Traffic Safety Impr - FY23 55,000 Carryover - Construction Tax/Grants
Bike/Ped & Traffic Safety Impr - FY24 55,000 FY2024 Construction Tax/Grants
Bike/Ped & Traffic Safety Impr - FY25 55,000 FY2025 Construction Tax/Grants
Bike/Ped & Traffic Safety Impr - FY26 55,000 FY2026 Construction Tax/Grants
Bike/Ped & Traffic Safety Impr - FY27 65,000 FY2027 Construction Tax/Grants
Bridge Conditions Assessment 60,000 FY2024 VIF
Camden Avenue Resurfacing 1,376,862 Carryover - VIF
Campbell PDA Enhancements 650,000 Carryover - VIF/Grants
Campbell PDA Enhancements Construction 580,000 FY2024 ARPA
Campbell Water Tower Light Replacement 100,000 FY2024 Carryover - CIPR
CCC - Heritage Theatre Boiler 90,000 FY2024 CIPR
Citywide ITS Enhancement Phase 2 500,000 FY2024 CIPR/Grants
Capital Improvement Plan
FY 2024 Through FY 2028
Civic Center Impr - Library Renovation 24,984,034 FY2024 Carryover - Grants/Bond Proceeds
Civic Center Impr - Police FF&E 1,500,000 FY2024 Carryover - Grants
Civic Center Impr - Police Operations Bldg 25,802,331 Carryover - Grants/Bond Proceeds
Civic Center Impr - Shared Costs 3,908,706 FY2024 - FY2025 Carryover - Grants/Bond Proceeds
Comm Center Transformer Replacement 200,000 Carryover - CIPR
Community Center Bathroom Upgrades 64,530 Carryover - CIPR
Council Chambers Cablecast Equip Upgrade 52,746 Carryover - CIPR
General Hazardous Materials Survey - CCC 150,000 Carryover - CIPR
Hamilton Ave Hwy 17 Southbound Offramp 3,007,000 FY2024 - FY2025 CIPR/Developer Fees
Harriet Avenue Sidewalks 1,282,619 Carryover - CIPR/Env Srvs/Grants
JDM Improvements - Rincon - Design 50,000 FY2025 Park Fees
JDM Park Parking Lots 240,000 Carryover - Park Fees
JDM Restrooms Improvement - Budd 839,000 FY2024 - FY2025 Park Fees
Measure B Bike/Ped Educ & Enco - FY18 thru FY21 116,257 Carryover - Grants
Measure B Bike/Ped Educ & Enco - FY22 thru FY23 80,155 Carryover - Grants
Misc Storm Drain Improvements - FY23 50,000 Carryover - Environmental Services
Misc Storm Drain Improvements - FY25 50,000 FY2025 Enviornmental Services
Misc Storm Drain Improvements - FY27 50,000 FY2027 Enviornmental Services
Officer Safety Plan 1,596,121 FY2024 - FY2031 Carryover - CIPR
Police Mobile Data Computer Replacement 193,250 FY2024 - FY2027 Carryover - CIPR
Pruneyard Creek Trail Extension 250,000 Carryover - Developer Fees
Service Center Portable Bldg Replacement 345,018 Carryover - Land Sale
Service Pistol Replacement 150,000 Carryover - CIPR
Sidewalk, Curb & Gutter Impr - FY25 75,000 FY2025 Construction Tax
Sidewalk, Curb & Gutter Impr - FY26 75,000 FY2026 Construction Tax
Sidewalk, Curb & Gutter Impr - FY27 75,000 FY2027 Construction Tax
Silicon Valley Radio Communications System 59,176 Carryover - CIPR
SR 17/San Tomas/Camden/White Oaks Impr 1,007,500 FY2027 Grants
Traffic Calming Improvements - FY19 44,529 Carryover - Construction Tax
Traffic Calming Improvements - FY23 50,000 Carryover - Construction Tax
Sub-Total 71,013,161$
Total 5-Year Capital Projects 95,174,079$
Annual Accessibility Ramps - FY28
Overview
Request Owner Amy Olay, City Engineer
Est. Start Date 07/01/2027
Est. Completion Date 06/30/2028
Department Public Works
Type Capital Improvement
Project Number 28-FF
Description
This project will install accessibility curb ramps in compliance with Americans with Disability Act (ADA) standards and is consistent with
the City's ADA Transition Plan.
Details
Program (Budget
Unit)
730
Useful Life 20 years
Projected Carryover N/A
Priority Medium (Get to it when you can)
Type of Project Improvement
Funding Type New
Location
Address: Campbell City Hall
Relationship to Strategic Goals and Objectives
This project addresses Strategic Plan Objective 3.3 - Streets that safely and comfortably accommodate pedestrians and
bicycles, and Objective 3.4 - Streets that are safe, clean, and well maintained.
Possible Alternative Solutions
1. Reduce or increase the number of ramps for installation each year.
Capital Cost Breakdown
Capital Cost FY2028 Total
Staff Personnel Costs $5,000 $5,000
Construction $45,000 $45,000
Total $50,000 $50,000
Capital Cost
Total Budget (all years)
$50K
Project Total
$50K
Capital Cost by Year
Construction Staff Personnel Costs
2028 $50,000.00
$0 $12K $24K $36K $48K
Capital Cost for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $50,000.00
Construction (90%)$45,000.00
Staff Personnel Costs (10%)$5,000.00
Funding Sources Breakdown
Funding Sources FY2028 Total
Construction Tax $50,000 $50,000
Total $50,000 $50,000
Funding Sources
Total Budget (all years)
$50K
Project Total
$50K
Funding Sources by Year
Construction Tax
2028 $50,000.00
$0 $12K $24K $36K $48K
Funding Sources for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $50,000.00
Construction Tax (100%)$50,000.00
Annual ADA Transition Plan Improvements - FY28
Overview
Request Owner Amy Olay, City Engineer
Est. Start Date 07/01/2027
Est. Completion Date 06/30/2028
Department Public Works
Type Capital Improvement
Project Number 28-HH
Description
Consistent with the City's Americans with Disability Act (ADA) Transition Plan, this project continues to implement identi ed
improvements at the Community Center, Service Center, City Hall, and other City facilities. Scope of work includes modi cations to doors,
bathroom xtures, and public counters.
Details
Program (Budget
Unit)
730
Useful Life 20 years
Projected Carryover N/A
Priority High (Can function without it, but not very
well)
Type of Project Improvement
Funding Type New
Location
Address: Campbell City Hall
Relationship to Strategic Goals and Objectives
This project will address Strategic Plan Objective 5.3 - Safe, attractive, and ef cient parks and buildings that operate for
maximum community use, bene t, and enjoyment.
Possible Alternative Solutions
1. Phase improvements and revise funding levels.
Capital Cost Breakdown
Capital Cost FY2028 Total
Construction $50,000 $50,000
Total $50,000 $50,000
Capital Cost
Total Budget (all years)
$50K
Project Total
$50K
Capital Cost by Year
Construction
2028 $50,000.00
$0 $12K $24K $36K $48K
Capital Cost for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $50,000.00
Construction (100%)$50,000.00
Funding Sources Breakdown
Funding Sources FY2028 Total
CIPR $50,000 $50,000
Total $50,000 $50,000
Funding Sources
Total Budget (all years)
$50K
Project Total
$50K
Funding Sources by Year
CIPR
2028 $50,000.00
$0 $12K $24K $36K $48K
Funding Sources for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $50,000.00
CIPR (100%)$50,000.00
Annual Street Maintenance - FY28
Overview
Request Owner Amy Olay, City Engineer
Est. Start Date 07/01/2027
Est. Completion Date 08/31/2028
Department Public Works
Type Capital Improvement
Project Number 28-BB
Description
This project is for annual street maintenance per the City's Pavement Management Program. Funding allocations in CIP FY27 will
provide pavement treatment on collector and local streets. In addition to the Capital Improvement Program Reserve (CIPR), other
anticipated funding sources are the City's Vehicle Impact Fee (separate allocations from construction and solid waste collection vehicles),
Santa Clara County Vehicle Registration Fee (VRF), State SB1 - Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), Santa Clara County
Measure B, and one-time grants (One Bay Area and CalRecycle). A maintenance of effort is required for cities to receive Measure B and
RMRA funds. The City must maintain an annual expenditure of $917,000 in general fund monies which are satis ed through the use of
CIPR and Vehicle Impact Fees.
Details
Program (Budget
Unit)
730
Useful Life 20 years
Projected Carryover N/A
Priority High (Can function without it, but not very
well)
Type of Project Resurface Current Street, Road or Sidewalk
Funding Type New
Location
Address: Campbell City Hall
Relationship to Strategic Goals and Objectives
This project addresses Strategic Plan Objective 3.4 - Streets that are safe, clean, and well-maintained.
Possible Alternative Solutions
1. Only pursue stop-gap maintenance.
2. Reduce the project limits resulting in decreased Pavement Condition Index (PCI).
Capital Cost Breakdown
Capital Cost FY2028 Total
Staff Personnel Costs $389,000 $389,000
Professional Services $50,000 $50,000
Construction $2,550,000 $2,550,000
Total $2,989,000 $2,989,000
Capital Cost
Total Budget (all years)
$2.989M
Project Total
$2.989M
Capital Cost by Year
Construction Professional Services
Staff Personnel Costs
2028 $2,989,000.00
$0 $800K $1.6M $2.4M
Capital Cost for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $2,989,000.00
Construction (85%)$2,550,000.00
Professional Services (2%)$50,000.00
Staff Personnel Costs (13%)$389,000.00
Funding Sources Breakdown
Funding Sources FY2028 Total
CIPR $200,000 $200,000
VIF (Building)$300,000 $300,000
VIF (Garbage)$477,000 $477,000
SB1 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
VRF $215,000 $215,000
Measure B $797,000 $797,000
Total $2,989,000 $2,989,000
Funding Sources
Total Budget (all years)
$2.989M
Project Total
$2.989M
Funding Sources by Year
CIPR Measure B
SB1 VIF (Building)
VIF (Garbage)VRF
2028 $2,989,000.00
$0 $800K $1.6M $2.4M
Funding Sources for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $2,989,000.00
CIPR (7%)$200,000.00
Measure B (27%)$797,000.00
SB1 (33%)$1,000,000.00
VIF (Building) (10%)$300,000.00
VIF (Garbage) (16%)$477,000.00
VRF (7%)$215,000.00
Annual Bike/Pedestrian and Traf c Safety Improvements - FY28
Overview
Request Owner Matthew Jue, Traf c Engineer
Est. Start Date 07/01/2027
Est. Completion Date 06/30/2030
Department Public Works
Type Capital Improvement
Project Number 28-JJ
Description
This annual project provides minor improvements to streets and signals to increase safety as deemed necessary by the City's Traf c
Engineer and City Engineer. This project also constructs Class II bike lanes, sidewalks, paths, and other improvements to enhance
pedestrian and bicyclist safety on City streets. The Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds represent the majority of the project
funding. Currently estimated at $40,000 annually, the amount can vary; annual adjustments may be necessary.
Images
Green Bike Lane
Details
Program (Budget
Unit)
720
Useful Life 20 years
Projected Carryover N/A
Priority Medium (Get to it when you can)
Type of Project Improvement
Funding Type New
Location
Address: 70 North 1st Street
Relationship to Strategic Goals and Objectives
Supports Strategic Objective 3.3 - Streets that safely and comfortably accommodate pedestrians and bicycles.
Possible Alternative Solutions
1. Allow the current conditions to remain.
2. Submit each minor project/improvement to the City Council for approval.
Capital Cost Breakdown
Capital Cost FY2028 Total
Staff Personnel Costs $5,000 $5,000
Construction $60,000 $60,000
Total $65,000 $65,000
Capital Cost
Total Budget (all years)
$65K
Project Total
$65K
Capital Cost by Year
Construction Staff Personnel Costs
2028 $65,000.00
$0 $20K $40K $60K
Capital Cost for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $65,000.00
Construction (92%)$60,000.00
Staff Personnel Costs (8%)$5,000.00
Funding Sources Breakdown
Funding Sources FY2028 Total
Construction Tax $25,000 $25,000
TDA $40,000 $40,000
Total $65,000 $65,000
Funding Sources
Total Budget (all years)
$65K
Project Total
$65K
Funding Sources by Year
Construction Tax TDA
2028 $65,000.00
$0 $20K $40K $60K
Funding Sources for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $65,000.00
Construction Tax (38%)$25,000.00
TDA (62%)$40,000.00
Campbell Community Center - Building A HVAC Controls
Overview
Request Owner Dave Fanucchi, Building Maintenance Supervisor
Est. Start Date 07/03/2023
Est. Completion Date 06/28/2024
Department Building Maintenance
Type Capital Improvement
Description
Campbell Community Center - Building A HVAC controls - the existing controls have lived beyond useful life. We have spent a
substantial amount of money on repair work that no longer helps. We will be installing the new Honeywell controls system that we are
now implementing throughout our HVAC systems. The new Honeywell controls will also allow the City to realize energy savings, since
the new controls will allow optimal heating and cooling throughout the building. Requesting $85,000.00 to cover new Honeywell
controls and any eld equipment repairs necessary for the system to operate.
Details
Program (Budget
Unit)
780
Useful Life 25 years
Projected Carryover N/A
Priority Critical (Can't do without it)
Type of Project Replacement
Funding Type New
Location
Supplemental Attachments
CCC - Bldg A Controls Proposal(/resource/cleargov-prod/projects/documents/6fecd01b76f6e722c923.pdf)
Relationship to Strategic Goals and Objectives
This project will address Strategic Plan Objectives 5.3 - Safe, attractive, and ef cient parks and buildings that operate for
maximum community use, bene t, and enjoyment.
Possible Alternative Solutions
1. An alternative is not available. The existing controls would require a complete replacement and Building Maintenance is
moving away from the existing system to the new Honeywell system of controls. If the controls are not replaced, the
Recreation Department could also lose leasing revenue if the tenant were to vacate the lease due to the ongoing issues of
HVAC control failures to regulate heating and cooling. The existing controls are constantly monitored and just do not
operate properly.
Capital Cost Breakdown
Capital Cost FY2024 Total
Construction $85,000 $85,000
Total $85,000 $85,000
Capital Cost
FY2024 Budget
$85,000
Total Budget (all years)
$85K
Project Total
$85K
Capital Cost by Year
Construction
2024 $85,000.00
$0 $25K $50K $75K
Capital Cost for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $85,000.00
Construction (100%)$85,000.00
Funding Sources Breakdown
Funding Sources FY2024 Total
CIPR $85,000 $85,000
Total $85,000 $85,000
Funding Sources
FY2024 Budget
$85,000
Total Budget (all years)
$85K
Project Total
$85K
Funding Sources by Year
CIPR
2024 $85,000.00
$0 $25K $50K $75K
Funding Sources for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $85,000.00
CIPR (100%)$85,000.00
Operational Costs Breakdown
Operational Costs FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 Total
Staff Personnel Costs $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $25,000
General Maintenance $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 $8,000 $40,000
Total $13,000 $13,000 $13,000 $13,000 $13,000 $65,000
Operational Costs
FY2024 Budget
$13,000
Total Budget (all years)
$65K
Project Total
$65K
Operational Costs by Year
General Maintenance Staff Personnel Costs
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
$13,000.00
$13,000.00
$13,000.00
$13,000.00
$13,000.00
$0 $4K $8K $12K
Operational Costs for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $65,000.00
General Maintenance (62%)$40,000.00
Staff Personnel Costs (38%)$25,000.00
Cost Savings Breakdown
Cost Savings FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 Total
Maintenance $13,000 $13,000 $13,000 $13,000 $13,000 $65,000
Utilities $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 $10,000
Total $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $75,000
Cost Savings
FY2024 Budget
$15,000
Total Budget (all years)
$75K
Project Total
$75K
Cost Savings by Year
Maintenance Utilities
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
$15,000.00
$15,000.00
$15,000.00
$15,000.00
$15,000.00
$0 $4K $8K $12K
Cost Savings for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $75,000.00
Maintenance (87%)$65,000.00
Utilities (13%)$10,000.00
Campbell Community Center - Building A Sewer Line Replacement
Overview
Request Owner Dave Fanucchi, Building Maintenance Supervisor
Est. Start Date 07/10/2023
Est. Completion Date 06/30/2026
Department Building Maintenance
Type Capital Improvement
Description
Campbell Community Center – Building A Sewer Line Replacement – the existing cast iron sewer line system beneath the building is
beginning to decay and causing repeated backups and clogging the lines. We have found areas of broken, or burst, pipes caused by
excess pressure within the old cast iron pipework as a result of usage and/or non- ushable items sticking within the pipework and not
freely owing through. We have spent a substantial amount of money on repair work that no longer helps. The goal is to replace the
existing with new pipe work over a three-year period. Requesting - $45,000.00 per year to aid in the replacement of the existing
pipelines.
Details
Program (Budget
Unit)
780
Useful Life 75 years
Projected Carryover N/A
Priority High (Can function without it, but not very
well)
Type of Project Replacement
Funding Type New
Location
Relationship to Strategic Goals and Objectives
This project will address Strategic Plan Objectives 5.3 - Safe, attractive, and ef cient parks and buildings that operate for
maximum community use, bene t, and enjoyment.
Possible Alternative Solutions
1. Continue to repair the existing sewer lines as sections break down, causing emergency call outs and repair work that will
be and is very expensive.
Capital Cost Breakdown
Capital Cost FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 Total
Construction $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $135,000
Total $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $135,000
Capital Cost
FY2024 Budget
$45,000
Total Budget (all years)
$135K
Project Total
$135K
Capital Cost by Year
Construction
2024
2025
2026
$45,000.00
$45,000.00
$45,000.00
$0 $12K $24K $36K
Capital Cost for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $135,000.00
Construction (100%)$135,000.00
Funding Sources Breakdown
Funding Sources FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 Total
CIPR $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $135,000
Total $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $135,000
Funding Sources
FY2024 Budget
$45,000
Total Budget (all years)
$135K
Project Total
$135K
Funding Sources by Year
CIPR
2024
2025
2026
$45,000.00
$45,000.00
$45,000.00
$0 $12K $24K $36K
Funding Sources for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $135,000.00
CIPR (100%)$135,000.00
Operational Costs Breakdown
Operational Costs FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 Total
Staff Personnel Costs $21,600 $21,600 $21,600 $64,800
General Maintenance $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $45,000
Total $36,600 $36,600 $36,600 $109,800
Operational Costs
FY2024 Budget
$36,600
Total Budget (all years)
$109.8K
Project Total
$109.8K
Operational Costs by Year
General Maintenance Staff Personnel Costs
2024
2025
2026
$36,600.00
$36,600.00
$36,600.00
$0 $10K $20K $30K
Operational Costs for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $109,800.00
General Maintenance (41%)$45,000.00
Staff Personnel Costs (59%)$64,800.00
Cost Savings Breakdown
Cost Savings FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 Total
Maintenance $36,600 $36,600 $36,600 $109,800
Total $36,600 $36,600 $36,600 $109,800
Cost Savings
FY2024 Budget
$36,600
Total Budget (all years)
$109.8K
Project Total
$109.8K
Cost Savings by Year
Maintenance
2024
2025
2026
$36,600.00
$36,600.00
$36,600.00
$0 $10K $20K $30K
Cost Savings for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $109,800.00
Maintenance (100%)$109,800.00
Campbell Community Center - Building M Roof Replacement
Overview
Request Owner Dave Fanucchi, Building Maintenance Supervisor
Est. Start Date 07/03/2023
Est. Completion Date 06/28/2024
Department Building Maintenance
Type Capital Improvement
Description
Campbell Community Center - Building M re-roof - The roof has signi cant leaks in most of the areas of the building. Originally, it was
scheduled to be "face-lifted" but after all this time and the recent rain events revealed the roof needs full replacement. We suspect there
will also be some substantial dry-rot areas that are not visible. We also have a large area of woodwork that needs to be replaced around a
sky-light system that is attached to the main roof area. Requesting - $400,000.00 to cover all of the work needed for the repairs.
Details
Program (Budget
Unit)
780
Useful Life 40 years
Projected Carryover N/A
Priority Critical (Can't do without it)
Type of Project Replacement
Funding Type New
Location
Supplemental Attachments
Garland CCC Roof Report(/resource/cleargov-prod/projects/documents/f9bc06e02fc0eaf74ab1.pdf)
Relationship to Strategic Goals and Objectives
This project will address Strategic Plan Objectives 5.3 - Safe, attractive, and ef cient parks and buildings that operate for
maximum community use, bene t, and enjoyment.
Possible Alternative Solutions
1. Continue to patch areas that are prone to leaks during rainy weather. However, the comprehensive reports written show
that piecemeal patching of areas may no longer work as the existing roo ng materials have outlived their respective life
expectancy.
Capital Cost Breakdown
Capital Cost FY2024 Total
Construction $400,000 $400,000
Total $400,000 $400,000
Capital Cost
FY2024 Budget
$400,000
Total Budget (all years)
$400K
Project Total
$400K
Capital Cost by Year
Construction
2024 $400,000.00
$0 $100K $200K $300K $400K
Capital Cost for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $400,000.00
Construction (100%)$400,000.00
Funding Sources Breakdown
Funding Sources FY2024 Total
CIPR $400,000 $400,000
Total $400,000 $400,000
Funding Sources
FY2024 Budget
$400,000
Total Budget (all years)
$400K
Project Total
$400K
Funding Sources by Year
CIPR
2024 $400,000.00
$0 $100K $200K $300K $400K
Funding Sources for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $400,000.00
CIPR (100%)$400,000.00
Operational Costs Breakdown
Operational Costs FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 Total
Staff Personnel Costs $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $25,000
General Maintenance $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $25,000
Total $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $50,000
Operational Costs
FY2024 Budget
$10,000
Total Budget (all years)
$50K
Project Total
$50K
Operational Costs by Year
General Maintenance Staff Personnel Costs
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$0 $2.5K $5K $7.5K $10K
Operational Costs for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $50,000.00
General Maintenance (50%)$25,000.00
Staff Personnel Costs (50%)$25,000.00
Cost Savings Breakdown
Cost Savings FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 Total
Maintenance $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $50,000
Total $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $50,000
Cost Savings
FY2024 Budget
$10,000
Total Budget (all years)
$50K
Project Total
$50K
Cost Savings by Year
Maintenance
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$10,000.00
$0 $2.5K $5K $7.5K $10K
Cost Savings for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $50,000.00
Maintenance (100%)$50,000.00
Campbell Community Center & Corporation Yard Roof
Replacements
Overview
Request Owner Dave Fanucchi, Building Maintenance Supervisor
Est. Start Date 08/01/2022
Est. Completion Date 08/31/2027
Department Building Maintenance
Type Capital Improvement
Description
Remove and replace existing roof materials that are in decline due to age and passing their respective life expectancy.
Details
Program (Budget
Unit)
780
Useful Life 30 years
Projected Carryover N/A
Priority Critical (Can't do without it)
Type of Project Replacement
Funding Type New
Location
Supplemental Attachments
Campbell Community Center Roof Report(/resource/cleargov-prod/projects/documents/76923220c4167b582e19.pdf)
Campbell Corp Yard Roof Report(/resource/cleargov-prod/projects/documents/4ccbed48587418a7d31d.pdf)
Relationship to Strategic Goals and Objectives
This project will address Strategic Plan Objectives 5.3 - Safe, attractive, and ef cient parks and buildings that operate for
maximum community use, bene t, and enjoyment.
Possible Alternative Solutions
1. Continue to patch areas that are prone to leaks during rainy weather. However, the comprehensive reports written show
that piecemeal patching of areas may no longer work as the existing roo ng materials have outlived their respective life
expectancy.1
Capital Cost Breakdown
Capital Cost FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 Total
Construction $475,000 $475,000 $463,000 $332,700 $557,000 $2,302,700
Total $475,000 $475,000 $463,000 $332,700 $557,000 $2,302,700
Capital Cost
FY2024 Budget
$475,000
Total Budget (all years)
$2.303M
Project Total
$2.303M
Capital Cost by Year
Construction
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
$475,000.00
$475,000.00
$463,000.00
$332,700.00
$557,000.00
$0 $150K $300K $450K
Capital Cost for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $2,302,700.00
Construction (100%)$2,302,700.00
Funding Sources Breakdown
Funding Sources FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 Total
CIPR $475,000 $475,000 $463,000 $332,700 $557,000 $2,302,700
Total $475,000 $475,000 $463,000 $332,700 $557,000 $2,302,700
Funding Sources
FY2024 Budget
$475,000
Total Budget (all years)
$2.303M
Project Total
$2.303M
Funding Sources by Year
CIPR
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
$475,000.00
$475,000.00
$463,000.00
$332,700.00
$557,000.00
$0 $150K $300K $450K
Funding Sources for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $2,302,700.00
CIPR (100%)$2,302,700.00
Cost Savings Breakdown
Cost Savings FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 Total
Maintenance $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $200,000
Total $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $200,000
Cost Savings
FY2024 Budget
$50,000
Total Budget (all years)
$200K
Project Total
$200K
Cost Savings by Year
Maintenance
2024
2025
2026
2027
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
$50,000.00
$0 $12K $24K $36K $48K
Cost Savings for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $200,000.00
Maintenance (100%)$200,000.00
City Hall - HVAC Chiller Replacement
Overview
Request Owner Dave Fanucchi, Building Maintenance Supervisor
Est. Start Date 07/03/2023
Est. Completion Date 06/28/2024
Department Building Maintenance
Type Capital Improvement
Description
City Hall - HVAC Chiller Unit replacement - the existing chiller has reached its useful life. An item we have spent a substantial amount of
money on repair work that no longer helps. We are also requesting this project be funded due to the availability of the new equipment,
which has a minimum 20 to 22 week lead time once a purchase order is issued and the cost of equipment continually changes due to
the current economic environment and in ation. Installing a new chiller will also improve energy savings, since the new unit will
operate more ef ciently. Requesting - $150,000.00 to cover all costs of the installation and some pipework rerouting.
Details
Program (Budget
Unit)
780
Useful Life 30 years
Projected Carryover N/A
Priority Critical (Can't do without it)
Type of Project Replacement
Funding Type New
Location
Supplemental Attachments
City Hall Chiller Replacement Proposal(/resource/cleargov-prod/projects/documents/22ed086df0a844283232.pdf)
Relationship to Strategic Goals and Objectives
This project will address Strategic Plan Objectives 5.3 - Safe, attractive, and ef cient parks and buildings that operate for
maximum community use, bene t, and enjoyment.
Possible Alternative Solutions
1. Continue to repair the existing unit until it catastrophically fails or until parts are no longer available.
Capital Cost Breakdown
Capital Cost FY2024 Total
Construction $150,000 $150,000
Total $150,000 $150,000
Capital Cost
FY2024 Budget
$150,000
Total Budget (all years)
$150K
Project Total
$150K
Capital Cost by Year
Construction
2024 $150,000.00
$0 $40K $80K $120K
Capital Cost for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $150,000.00
Construction (100%)$150,000.00
Funding Sources Breakdown
Funding Sources FY2024 Total
CIPR $150,000 $150,000
Total $150,000 $150,000
Funding Sources
FY2024 Budget
$150,000
Total Budget (all years)
$150K
Project Total
$150K
Funding Sources by Year
CIPR
2024 $150,000.00
$0 $40K $80K $120K
Funding Sources for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $150,000.00
CIPR (100%)$150,000.00
Operational Costs Breakdown
Operational Costs FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 Total
Staff Personnel Costs $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $25,000
General Maintenance $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $75,000
Utilities $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $50,000
Total $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $150,000
Operational Costs
FY2024 Budget
$30,000
Total Budget (all years)
$150K
Project Total
$150K
Operational Costs by Year
General Maintenance Staff Personnel Costs
Utilities
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
$30,000.00
$30,000.00
$30,000.00
$30,000.00
$30,000.00
$0 $8K $16K $24K
Operational Costs for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $150,000.00
General Maintenance (50%)$75,000.00
Staff Personnel Costs (17%)$25,000.00
Utilities (33%)$50,000.00
Cost Savings Breakdown
Cost Savings FY2024 FY2025 FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 Total
Maintenance $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $75,000
Utilities $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $10,000 $50,000
Other Cost Savings $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $25,000
Total $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $150,000
Cost Savings
FY2024 Budget
$30,000
Total Budget (all years)
$150K
Project Total
$150K
Cost Savings by Year
Maintenance Other Cost Savings
Utilities
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
$30,000.00
$30,000.00
$30,000.00
$30,000.00
$30,000.00
$0 $8K $16K $24K
Cost Savings for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $150,000.00
Maintenance (50%)$75,000.00
Other Cost Savings (17%)$25,000.00
Utilities (33%)$50,000.00
City Hall Public Counters and Accessibility Improvements
Overview
Request Owner Todd Capurso, Public Works Director
Est. Start Date 09/01/2023
Est. Completion Date 06/30/2024
Department Building Maintenance
Type Capital Improvement
Description
Design and replace new accessible public counters at various areas in City Hall, including the following areas: City Manager's Of ce,
Council Chambers, Finance, Community Development, and Public Works. All new counters will be ADA compliant and will provide
increased security for non-public areas. Council Chamber improvements will include accessibility for public participation and evaluate
alternative seating con gurations.
Details
Program (Budget
Unit)
780
Useful Life 15 years
Projected Carryover N/A
Priority High (Can function without it, but not very
well)
Type of Project Improvement
Funding Type New
Location
Relationship to Strategic Goals and Objectives
This project will address Strategic Plan Objective 5.3 - Safe, attractive, and ef cient parks and buildings that operate for
maximum community use, bene t, and enjoyment.
Possible Alternative Solutions
1. Fund elements individually as funding allows.
Capital Cost Breakdown
Capital Cost FY2024 Total
Design $20,000 $20,000
Construction $200,000 $200,000
Total $220,000 $220,000
Capital Cost
FY2024 Budget
$220,000
Total Budget (all years)
$220K
Project Total
$220K
Capital Cost by Year
Construction Design
2024 $220,000.00
$0 $60K $120K $180K
Capital Cost for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $220,000.00
Construction (91%)$200,000.00
Design (9%)$20,000.00
Funding Sources Breakdown
Funding Sources FY2024 Total
CIPR $220,000 $220,000
Total $220,000 $220,000
Funding Sources
FY2024 Budget
$220,000
Total Budget (all years)
$220K
Project Total
$220K
Funding Sources by Year
CIPR
2024 $220,000.00
$0 $60K $120K $180K
Funding Sources for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $220,000.00
CIPR (100%)$220,000.00
Community Center Skate Park Renovation
Overview
Request Owner Todd Capurso, Public Works Director
Est. Start Date 07/01/2025
Est. Completion Date 06/30/2026
Department Recreation and Community Services
Type Capital Improvement
Description
Design and implement improvements to the Campbell Community Center Skate Park. Remove existing skate park elements. Prepare
new design of skate park with new elements. Procure and install elements.
Details
Program (Budget
Unit)
701
Useful Life 15 years
Projected Carryover N/A
Priority Medium (Get to it when you can)
Type of Project Improvement
Location
Relationship to Strategic Goals and Objectives
This project will address Strategic Plan Objectives 5.2 - Enhanced recreational opportunities for Campbell residents; 5.3 -Safe,
attractive, and ef cient parks and buildings that operate for maximum community use, bene t, and enjoyment.
Possible Alternative Solutions
1. Do not move forward with improvements - defer project. Repair elements as needed.
Capital Cost Breakdown
Capital Cost FY2026 Total
Design $20,000 $20,000
Construction $200,000 $200,000
Total $220,000 $220,000
Capital Cost
Total Budget (all years)
$220K
Project Total
$220K
Capital Cost by Year
Construction Design
2026 $220,000.00
$0 $60K $120K $180K
Capital Cost for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $220,000.00
Construction (91%)$200,000.00
Design (9%)$20,000.00
Funding Sources Breakdown
Funding Sources FY2026 Total
Park Fees $220,000 $220,000
Total $220,000 $220,000
Funding Sources
Total Budget (all years)
$220K
Project Total
$220K
Funding Sources by Year
Park Fees
2026 $220,000.00
$0 $60K $120K $180K
Funding Sources for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $220,000.00
Park Fees (100%)$220,000.00
Projected Timeline
Jul 2, 2025
Begin design
Oct 1, 2025
Approve design
Oct 2, 2025
Begin construction
Mar 3, 2026
Complete Improvements
East Campbell Avenue Plan Line
Overview
Request Owner Amy Olay, City Engineer
Est. Start Date 07/01/2024
Est. Completion Date 06/30/2025
Department Engineering
Type Capital Improvement
Description
This project will generate a Plan Line along East Campbell Avenue from Railway Avenue to Bascom Avenue. Based on the East Campbell
Avenue Master Plan, the Plan Line will determine the street geometrics to include the type and width of lane lines within the street
right-of-way and will serve to facilitate future developments along East Campbell Avenue with guidance on public improvement needs.
Details
Program (Budget
Unit)
730
Useful Life 25 years
Projected Carryover N/A
Priority Medium (Get to it when you can)
Type of Project Other
Funding Type New
Location
Relationship to Strategic Goals and Objectives
This project will address Strategic Plan Objective 3.3 - Streets that safely and comfortably accommodate pedestrians and
bicycles, and Objective 3.4 - Street that are safe, clean, and well-maintained.
Possible Alternative Solutions
1. Do not proceed with the project and implement the East Campbell Avenue Master Plan as is which needs evaluation for
an update to meet current Complete Streets elements.
Capital Cost Breakdown
Capital Cost FY2028 Total
Staff Personnel Costs $50,000 $50,000
Professional Services $150,000 $150,000
Total $200,000 $200,000
Capital Cost
Total Budget (all years)
$200K
Project Total
$200K
Capital Cost by Year
Professional Services Staff Personnel Costs
2028 $200,000.00
$0 $50K $100K $150K $200K
Capital Cost for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $200,000.00
Professional Services (75%)$150,000.00
Staff Personnel Costs (25%)$50,000.00
Funding Sources Breakdown
Funding Sources FY2028 Total
CIPR $200,000 $200,000
Total $200,000 $200,000
Funding Sources
Total Budget (all years)
$200K
Project Total
$200K
Funding Sources by Year
CIPR
2028 $200,000.00
$0 $50K $100K $150K $200K
Funding Sources for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $200,000.00
CIPR (100%)$200,000.00
Dog Park Renovation - Los Gatos Creek County Park
Overview
Request Owner Todd Capurso, Public Works Director
Est. Start Date 08/01/2023
Est. Completion Date 06/30/2024
Department Engineering
Type Capital Improvement
Description
In collaboration with Santa Clara County Parks, renovate existing dog park located in County facility. Project will replace existing
surfacing and fencing as appropriate. Also evaluate shade structure, seating areas, and drinking fountains for replacement.
Details
Program (Budget
Unit)
730
Useful Life 20 years
Priority Medium (Get to it when you can)
Type of Project Improvement
Funding Type New
Location
Relationship to Strategic Goals and Objectives
This project will address Strategic Plan Objectives 5.2 - Enhanced recreational opportunities for Campbell residents; 5.3 -Safe,
attractive, and ef cient parks and buildings that operate for maximum community use, bene t, and enjoyment.
Possible Alternative Solutions
1. Do not move forward with improvements - repair individual elements as needed.
Capital Cost Breakdown
Capital Cost FY2024 Total
Design $20,000 $20,000
Construction $300,000 $300,000
Total $320,000 $320,000
Capital Cost
FY2024 Budget
$320,000
Total Budget (all years)
$320K
Project Total
$320K
Capital Cost by Year
Construction Design
2024 $320,000.00
$0 $80K $160K $240K $320K
Capital Cost for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $320,000.00
Construction (94%)$300,000.00
Design (6%)$20,000.00
Funding Sources Breakdown
Funding Sources FY2024 Total
Park Fees $320,000 $320,000
Total $320,000 $320,000
Funding Sources
FY2024 Budget
$320,000
Total Budget (all years)
$320K
Project Total
$320K
Funding Sources by Year
Park Fees
2024 $320,000.00
$0 $80K $160K $240K $320K
Funding Sources for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $320,000.00
Park Fees (100%)$320,000.00
2016 Meas B Bike/Pedestrian Educ & Encourage - FY24 & FY25
Overview
Request Owner Matthew Jue, Traf c Engineer
Est. Start Date 07/01/2023
Est. Completion Date 06/30/2027
Department Public Works
Type Capital Improvement
Description
This annual project provides bicycle and pedestrian education and encouragement efforts such as parent and student surveys, Safe
Routes to School maps, citywide bike map, bike rodeos, bicycle corral check-ins at Farmers Market, before-and-after traf c counts, online
questionnaires, and educational videos. The annual allocation of 2016 Bike/Ped Education and Encouragement (EE) funds serve as the
source of project funding. This project represents the FY24 and FY25 allocations estimated to be $40,000 per year, or a total of $80,000.
Images
Walk to School Kids on Bikes
Details
Program (Budget
Unit)
720
Useful Life 10 years
Projected Carryover N/A
Priority Medium (Get to it when you can)
Type of Project Other
Funding Type New
Location
Address: 70 North 1st Street
Relationship to Strategic Goals and Objectives
Supports Strategic Objective 3.3 - Streets that safely and comfortably accommodate pedestrians and bicycles.
Possible Alternative Solutions
1. Do not use annual allocation.
Capital Cost Breakdown
Capital Cost FY2024 FY2025 Total
Staff Personnel Costs $5,000 $5,000 $10,000
Professional Services $35,000 $35,000 $70,000
Total $40,000 $40,000 $80,000
Capital Cost
FY2024 Budget
$40,000
Total Budget (all years)
$80K
Project Total
$80K
Capital Cost by Year
Professional Services Staff Personnel Costs
2024
2025
$40,000.00
$40,000.00
$0 $10K $20K $30K $40K
Capital Cost for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $80,000.00
Professional Services (88%)$70,000.00
Staff Personnel Costs (13%)$10,000.00
Funding Sources Breakdown
Funding Sources FY2024 FY2025 Total
Measure B $40,000 $40,000 $80,000
Total $40,000 $40,000 $80,000
Funding Sources
FY2024 Budget
$40,000
Total Budget (all years)
$80K
Project Total
$80K
Funding Sources by Year
Measure B
2024
2025
$40,000.00
$40,000.00
$0 $10K $20K $30K $40K
Funding Sources for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $80,000.00
Measure B (100%)$80,000.00
Projected Timeline
Jul 1, 2023
Planning
Oct 1, 2023
Bids Received
Jan 1, 2024
Bid Award
Apr 1, 2024
Professional Services
2016 Meas B Bike/Pedestrian Educ & Encourage - FY26 & FY27
Overview
Request Owner Matthew Jue, Traf c Engineer
Est. Start Date 07/01/2025
Est. Completion Date 06/30/2029
Department Public Works
Type Capital Improvement
Description
This annual project provides bicycle and pedestrian education and encouragement efforts such as parent and student surveys, Safe
Routes to School maps, citywide bike map, bike rodeos, bicycle corral check-ins at Farmers Market, before-and-after traf c counts, online
questionnaires, and educational videos. The annual allocation of 2016 Bike/Ped Education and Encouragement (EE) funds serve as the
source of project funding. This project represents the FY24 and FY25 allocations estimated to be $40,000 per year, or a total of $80,000.
Images
Kids on Bikes Walk to School
Details
Program (Budget
Unit)
720
Useful Life 10 years
Projected Carryover N/A
Priority Medium (Get to it when you can)
Type of Project Other
Funding Type New
Location
Address: 70 North 1st Street
Relationship to Strategic Goals and Objectives
Supports Strategic Objective 3.3 - Streets that safely and comfortably accommodate pedestrians and bicycles.
Possible Alternative Solutions
1. Do not use annual allocation.
Capital Cost Breakdown
Capital Cost FY2026 FY2027 Total
Staff Personnel Costs $5,000 $5,000 $10,000
Professional Services $35,000 $35,000 $70,000
Total $40,000 $40,000 $80,000
Capital Cost
Total Budget (all years)
$80K
Project Total
$80K
Capital Cost by Year
Professional Services Staff Personnel Costs
2026
2027
$40,000.00
$40,000.00
$0 $10K $20K $30K $40K
Capital Cost for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $80,000.00
Professional Services (88%)$70,000.00
Staff Personnel Costs (13%)$10,000.00
Funding Sources Breakdown
Funding Sources FY2026 FY2027 Total
Measure B $40,000 $40,000 $80,000
Total $40,000 $40,000 $80,000
Funding Sources
Total Budget (all years)
$80K
Project Total
$80K
Funding Sources by Year
Measure B
2026
2027
$40,000.00
$40,000.00
$0 $10K $20K $30K $40K
Funding Sources for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $80,000.00
Measure B (100%)$80,000.00
Projected Timeline
Jul 1, 2025
Planning
Oct 1, 2025
Bids Received
Jan 1, 2026
Bid Award
Apr 1, 2026
Professional Services
2016 Meas B Bike/Pedestrian Educ & Encourage - FY28
Overview
Request Owner Matthew Jue, Traf c Engineer
Est. Start Date 07/01/2027
Est. Completion Date 06/30/2030
Department Public Works
Type Capital Improvement
Description
This annual project provides bicycle and pedestrian education and encouragement efforts such as parent and student surveys, Safe
Routes to School maps, citywide bike map, bike rodeos, bicycle corral check-ins at Farmers Market, before-and-after traf c counts, online
questionnaires, and educational videos. The annual allocation of 2016 Bike/Ped Education and Encouragement (EE) funds serve as the
source of project funding. This project represents the FY28 allocations estimated to be $40,000 per year.
Images
Walk to School Kids on Bikes
Details
Program (Budget
Unit)
720
Useful Life 10 years
Projected Carryover N/A
Priority Medium (Get to it when you can)
Type of Project Other
Funding Type New
Location
Address: 70 North 1st Street
Relationship to Strategic Goals and Objectives
Supports Strategic Objective 3.3 - Streets that safely and comfortably accommodate pedestrians and bicycles.
Possible Alternative Solutions
1. Do not use annual allocation.
Capital Cost Breakdown
Capital Cost FY2028 Total
Staff Personnel Costs $5,000 $5,000
Professional Services $35,000 $35,000
Total $40,000 $40,000
Capital Cost
Total Budget (all years)
$40K
Project Total
$40K
Capital Cost by Year
Professional Services Staff Personnel Costs
2028 $40,000.00
$0 $10K $20K $30K $40K
Capital Cost for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $40,000.00
Professional Services (88%)$35,000.00
Staff Personnel Costs (13%)$5,000.00
Funding Sources Breakdown
Funding Sources FY2028 Total
Measure B $40,000 $40,000
Total $40,000 $40,000
Funding Sources
Total Budget (all years)
$40K
Project Total
$40K
Funding Sources by Year
Measure B
2028 $40,000.00
$0 $10K $20K $30K $40K
Funding Sources for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $40,000.00
Measure B (100%)$40,000.00
Projected Timeline
Jul 1, 2027
Planning
Oct 1, 2027
Bids Received
Jan 1, 2028
Bid Award
Apr 1, 2028
Professional Services
Annual Sidewalk, Curb, & Gutter Improvements - FY28
Overview
Request Owner Ron Taormina, PW Maintenance Supervisor
Est. Start Date 07/01/2027
Est. Completion Date 06/30/2028
Department Public Works
Type Capital Improvement
Project Number 28-GG
Description
This annual project proposes to replace newly damaged sidewalks that are identi ed for replacement or grinding. The City uses concrete
and no longer uses asphalt as sidewalk replacement material when removing sections of sidewalk. Sidewalk grinds are performed on
raised sidewalks where the sidewalk de ection is less than 1 and 1/2 inches. Curb and gutters are replaced in kind when the damaged or
raised curb and gutter prohibits safe pedestrian access to travel ways. These locations are typically at intersections or in front of
crosswalks. Curb and gutter water ow issues are not criteria for replacement under this ongoing maintenance project proposal.
Details
Program (Budget
Unit)
730
Useful Life 20 years
Projected Carryover N/A
Priority Medium (Get to it when you can)
Type of Project Improvement
Funding Type New
Location
Address: Campbell City Hall
Relationship to Strategic Goals and Objectives
Strategic Plan Objective 3.1 - Safe residential neighborhoods.
Strategic Plan Objective 3.3 - Streets that safely and comfortably accommodate pedestrian and bicycles.
Possible Alternative Solutions
1. Continue to replace damaged sidewalk with asphalt.
2. Do not replace any curb and gutter.
Capital Cost Breakdown
Capital Cost FY2028 Total
Construction $75,000 $75,000
Total $75,000 $75,000
Capital Cost
Total Budget (all years)
$75K
Project Total
$75K
Capital Cost by Year
Construction
2028 $75,000.00
$0 $20K $40K $60K
Capital Cost for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $75,000.00
Construction (100%)$75,000.00
Funding Sources Breakdown
Funding Sources FY2028 Total
Construction Tax $75,000 $75,000
Total $75,000 $75,000
Funding Sources
Total Budget (all years)
$75K
Project Total
$75K
Funding Sources by Year
Construction Tax
2028 $75,000.00
$0 $20K $40K $60K
Funding Sources for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $75,000.00
Construction Tax (100%)$75,000.00
Traf c Calming Improvements FY24
Overview
Request Owner Matthew Jue, Traf c Engineer
Est. Start Date 07/01/2022
Est. Completion Date 06/30/2024
Department Public Works
Type Capital Improvement
Project Number 24-KK
Description
This project will allow staff to address traf c calming issues in various neighborhoods throughout the City - consistent with the Traf c
Calming Policy: engaging the community and constructing improvements to reduce speeds and volume on streets that meet the
adopted criteria.
Details
Program (Budget
Unit)
720
Useful Life 20 years
Projected Carryover N/A
Priority Medium (Get to it when you can)
Type of Project Improvement
Funding Type New
Location
Address: Campbell City Hall
Relationship to Strategic Goals and Objectives
Supports Strategic Objective 3.1 - Safe residential neighborhoods and 3.3 - Streets that safely and comfortably accommodate
pedestrians and bicycles.
Possible Alternative Solutions
1. Allow the current conditions to remain.
Capital Cost Breakdown
Capital Cost FY2024 Total
Construction $50,000 $50,000
Total $50,000 $50,000
Capital Cost
FY2024 Budget
$50,000
Total Budget (all years)
$50K
Project Total
$50K
Capital Cost by Year
Construction
2024 $50,000.00
$0 $12K $24K $36K $48K
Capital Cost for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $50,000.00
Construction (100%)$50,000.00
Funding Sources Breakdown
Funding Sources FY2024 Total
Construction Tax $50,000 $50,000
Total $50,000 $50,000
Funding Sources
FY2024 Budget
$50,000
Total Budget (all years)
$50K
Project Total
$50K
Funding Sources by Year
Construction Tax
2024 $50,000.00
$0 $12K $24K $36K $48K
Funding Sources for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $50,000.00
Construction Tax (100%)$50,000.00
Virginia Park Landscape Improvements
Overview
Request Owner Todd Capurso, Public Works Director
Est. Start Date 09/01/2025
Est. Completion Date 06/30/2026
Department Engineering
Type Capital Improvement
Description
Renovate seating and landscaped areas throughout the park.
Details
Program (Budget
Unit)
730
Useful Life 20 years
Projected Carryover N/A
Priority Medium (Get to it when you can)
Type of Project Improvement
Funding Type New
Location
Relationship to Strategic Goals and Objectives
This project will address Strategic Plan Objective 5.3 - Safe, attractive, and ef cient parks and buildings that operate for
maximum community use, bene t, and enjoyment.
Possible Alternative Solutions
1. Defer improvements to a future date. Research grant opportunities to augment or replace funding.
Capital Cost Breakdown
Capital Cost FY2026 Total
Design $10,000 $10,000
Construction $100,000 $100,000
Total $110,000 $110,000
Capital Cost
Total Budget (all years)
$110K
Project Total
$110K
Capital Cost by Year
Construction Design
2026 $110,000.00
$0 $30K $60K $90K
Capital Cost for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $110,000.00
Construction (91%)$100,000.00
Design (9%)$10,000.00
Funding Sources Breakdown
Funding Sources FY2026 Total
Park Fees $110,000 $110,000
Total $110,000 $110,000
Funding Sources
Total Budget (all years)
$110K
Project Total
$110K
Funding Sources by Year
Park Fees
2026 $110,000.00
$0 $30K $60K $90K
Funding Sources for Budgeted Years
TOTAL $110,000.00
Park Fees (100%)$110,000.00
Attachment 2
General Plan Policies and Strategies
Land Use and Transportation
Policy LUT-1.2: Regional Land Use and Transportation Planning: Promote integrated and coordinated
regional land use and transportation planning.
Policy LUT-1.4: Regional Traffic Management: Lead and participate in initiatives and functions to
manage regional traffic and to reduce congestion on area roadways.
Strategy LUT-1.3d: Regional Off-Road Bicycle and Pedestrian Paths: Cooperate with surrounding
communities and other agencies to establish and maintain off-road bicycle and
pedestrian paths and trails utilizing creek, utility, and railroad right-of-way that are
safe, convenient and visible for commuting and recreational use.
Policy LUT-2.1: Multi-modal Transportation: Develop and implement a multi-modal transportation
network that balance transportation options aimed at reducing automobile traffic and
greenhouse gas emissions while promoting healthier travel alternatives for all users
Strategy LUT-2.1b: Bicycle Plan Implementation: Use the development review process and the Capital
Improvement Program to identify opportunities to implement bicycle connections,
parking, storage and other related improvements.
Strategy LUT-2.1h: Pedestrian Plan: Develop and implement a pedestrian plan that is safe, convenient and
functional creating a network connecting neighborhoods with services, recreation,
transit and employment centers and consistent with the City’s ADA Implementation
Plan.
Strategy LUT-2.1i: Street Design and Improvements: Design streets and sidewalks so as to provide a
comfortable, accessible and safe pedestrian experience.
Strategy LUT-2.1r: Safe Routes to Schools: Promote and support Safe Routes to Schools policies and
programs for all schools serving Campbell including safe and convenient walking and
bicycle connections.
Policy LUT-2.3: Roadway and Intersection Disruption Minimization: Minimize traffic disruptions
along arterial roadways and major intersections.
Strategy LUT-2.3a: Intersection Level of Service: To the extent possible, maintain level of service (LOS)
on designated intersections consistent with the Santa Clara County Congestion
Management Plan.
Street Appearance and Public Improvements
Policy LUT-7.1: Road Maintenance: Maintain and repair roads.
Strategy LUT-7.1b: Roadway Repair and Maintenance: Conduct roadway repair and routine maintenance
as necessary.
Policy LUT-7.2: Public Utilities and Improvements: Provide a comprehensive network of sidewalks,
public utilities and multi-modal improvements that are safe, attractive, efficient, well
maintained and accessible for pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists.
Strategy LUT-7.2j: Sidewalks: Inventory sidewalks and develop a program to address filling the gaps.
Design sidewalks that are separated from the automobile travel way, on arterial streets.
Sidewalks along other streets should be consistent with the neighborhood.
General Plan Policies and Strategies Page 2 of 3
Policy LUT-7.3 Transportation Safety: Make safety a priority of citywide transportation design and
planning.
Strategy LUT-7.3a: Intersection Design: Incorporate pedestrian and bicycle features and auto safety
components in intersection design and improvement projects, such as curb cuts to
accommodate bicycle trailers, bicycle crossing buttons at traffic signals, appropriately
designed bulb-outs to shorten pedestrian crossings but still facilitating bicyclists, and
bicycle sensors at major intersections. Develop a comprehensive policy incorporating
strategies that facilitate the movement of pedestrians and bicyclists through
intersections that includes periodic safety risk evaluations and corresponding safety
measures.
Amenities, Open Space and Community Linkages
Policy LUT-11.1: Physically Connected Transportation Infrastructure: Strive to achieve physically
connected transportation infrastructure.
Strategy LUT-11.1g: Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): Address the needs of people with disabilities
and comply with the requirements of the ADA during the planning and implementation
of transportation and parking improvement projects.
Open Space, Parks and Recreation Facilities
Policy OSP-1.1: Regional Open Space, Parks and Recreation Facilities: Support efforts to enhance,
enlarge and provide public access to regional open space, parks and recreation
facilities to meet the needs of Campbell residents.
Strategy OSP-1.1a: Santa Clara County Parks and Trails: Work with Santa Clara County and the Santa
Clara Valley Water District to renovate and improve access to the Los Gatos Creek
Trail and Los Gatos County Park,
Policy OSP-2.2: Maintain and Renovate Existing Open Space, Park and Recreation Facilities: Maintain
and renovate existing open space, park and recreation facilities to improve their
usefulness, safety and appearance.
Strategy OSP-2.2b: Park Improvement Budget: Coordinate the budget for park improvement projects with
the development of the Capital Improvement Plan.
Strategy OSP-3.2a: Park Impact Fees: Utilize park impact fees for the acquisition and development of
parks and recreation facilities.
Policy OSP-9.2: NPDES: Comply with the federal Clean Water Act requirements for National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System permits
Strategy OSP-9.2a: Storm Water Management Plan: Work with the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff
Pollution Prevention Program to implement the Storm Water Management Plan.
Strategy OSP-9.2b: West Valley Clean Water Program: Implement the Work Plan for the West Valley
Cities, including implementing Campbell’s Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
and Best Management Practices.
Public Facilities and Services
Policy OSP-6.2: Community Facilities: Ensure functional, attractive and well-maintained community
facilities that serve Campbell’s residents.
Strategy OSP-6.2a: New or Renovated Facilities: Design, construct or renovate facilities to ensure
adaptability for changing community needs and on-going use.
General Plan Policies and Strategies Page 3 of 3
Strategy OSP-6.2b: Aging Facilities: Renovate and modernize aging facilities to improve their usefulness
and appearance and to maximize their potential life and avoid the high cost of deferred
maintenance.
Strategy OSP-6.2d: Accessible Facilities: Modernize City facilities to provide full accessibility to all
residents and visitors, including those with disabilities.
Policy OSP-6.3: Public Spaces and Amenities for Community Gatherings: Ensure safe, convenient and
attractive public spaces and amenities for community gatherings and activities.
Strategy OSP-6.3a: Features and Maintenance of Public Spaces and Amenities: Encourage community
gatherings and individual use of public spaces and amenities by providing attractive
landscaping, outdoor furniture, recycling and trash facilities and adequate maintenance
of the facilities.
Historic Resources
Policy CNR-1.1: Historic Resource Preservation: Ensure that the City and its citizens preserve historic
resources as much as possible.
Policy LUT-8-1: Historic Buildings, Landmarks and Districts and Cultural Resources: Preserve,
rehabilitate or restore the City’s historic buildings, landmarks, districts and cultural
resources and retain the architectural integrity of established building patterns within
historic residential neighborhoods to preserve the cultural heritage of the community.
Strategy LUT-8.1j: Heritage Theater: Support efforts to restore the Heritage Theater.
Strategy CNR-2.1b: Historic Amenities: Use amenities such as signs and historical lighting in key public
access areas. Consider incorporating public art to reflect historical elements.
Downtown Development Plan
Policy CPT-3.1: Adequate Parking: Encourage the joint utilization of parking.
Strategy CPT-3.1b: Develop a plan with the property/business owners to develop a parking management
plan to maximize the use of existing parking…
Strategy CPT-1.1d: Pedestrian connections shall be enhanced between the downtown and the Community
Center on the west and the Los Gatos Creek Trail/Pruneyard Shopping Center on the
east.
Strategy LU-4.1a The historic character of Downtown shall be preserved through the protection and
restoration of its historic buildings and landmarks.
ITEM NO. 3
CITY OF CAMPBELL ∙ PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report ∙ May 9, 2023 PLN-2022-44
Public Hearing to consider the request of AU Energy LLC for
property located at 570 E. Hamilton Avenue to allow
reconstruction of a Shell service station with an expanded convenience store including off-site alcohol beverage sales, a drive-through carwash, and 24-hour operational hours. The application under consideration includes a Conditional Use Permit with Site
and Architectural Review. File No.: PLN-2022-44.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission take the following action:
1. Make a motion to continue consideration of this item to the regular Planning Commission
meeting of June 27, 2023.
DISCUSSION
The applicant has requested the hearing be continued because the gas station owner will be out of the country (reference Attachment 1).
Attachments 1. Email
Prepared by:
Daniel Fama, Senior Planner
Approved by:
Rob Eastwood, Community Development Director
1
Daniel Fama
From:Daniel Fama
Sent:Tuesday, May 2, 2023 1:10 PM
To:Muthana Ibrahim
Cc:Sunny Goyal
Subject:RE: 570 E. Hamilton Ave., Campbell - Shell Gas Station
Okay. We’ll reschedule to June 27th.
Daniel Fama
Senior Planner
City of Campbell | Community Development Department
(408)866-2193 (call or text)
Book a Virtual/In-Person Appointment with a Planner here.
Apply for Planning and Building Permits here.
From: Muthana Ibrahim <muthana@miarchitect.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2023 12:38 PM
To: Daniel Fama <danielf@campbellca.gov>
Cc: Sunny Goyal <sunny@loopneighborhood.com>
Subject: RE: 570 E. Hamilton Ave., Campbell ‐ Shell Gas Station
Yes. June 27th. works for us.
Muthana Ibrahim
Architect, AIA, President
M I Architects, Inc.
2221 Olympic Blvd, Suite 100, Walnut Creek, CA 94595 | T: 925‐287‐1174 x 1 | F: 925‐943‐1581 | C: 925‐878‐9875
muthana@miarchitect.com
Please visit our website: www.miarchitect.com
The information contained in this email may be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. The information is intended only for the use
of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender immediately by reply
email and delete this message and attachments from your computer. Thank you.
From: Daniel Fama <danielf@campbellca.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2023 11:39 AM
To: Muthana Ibrahim <muthana@miarchitect.com>
Cc: Sunny Goyal <sunny@loopneighborhood.com>
Subject: RE: 570 E. Hamilton Ave., Campbell ‐ Shell Gas Station
Okay. It would need to be June 27th (June 20th is a City council meeting).
2
Daniel Fama
Senior Planner
City of Campbell | Community Development Department
(408) 866-2193 (call or text)
Book a Virtual/In-Person Appointment with a Planner here.
Apply for Planning and Building Permits here.
From: Muthana Ibrahim <muthana@miarchitect.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2023 11:08 AM
To: Daniel Fama <danielf@campbellca.gov>
Cc: Sunny Goyal <sunny@loopneighborhood.com>
Subject: RE: 570 E. Hamilton Ave., Campbell ‐ Shell Gas Station
Hi Daniel,
Please postponed the Planning Commission hearing for the above referenced project to June 20, 2023. The
reason for this request is the applicant/owner of the gas station will be out of the country. Please let me know
if you have any questions.
Muthana Ibrahim
Architect, AIA, President
M I Architects, Inc.
2221 Olympic Blvd, Suite 100, Walnut Creek, CA 94595 | T: 925‐287‐1174 x 1 | F: 925‐943‐1581 | C: 925‐878‐9875
muthana@miarchitect.com
Please visit our website: www.miarchitect.com
The information contained in this email may be privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. The information is intended only for the use
of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or copying of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, or are not the named recipient(s), please notify the sender immediately by reply
email and delete this message and attachments from your computer. Thank you.
City of Campbell -- Community Development Department
70 N. First Street, Campbell, CA 95008
MEMORANDUM
To: Members of the Planning Commission Date: May 9, 2023
From: Rob Eastwood, Community Development Director
Subject: Report of the Community Development Director
I. Code of Conduct Policy - Board Members & Commissioners
On Tuesday, March 21st, 2023, the City Council adopted the Code of Conduct Policy for
Board Members and Commissions.
The draft Code of Conduct was previously reviewed by the Planning Commission at its
October 11, 2022 meeting where it provided feedback and questions. The adopted Code of
Conduct Policy includes a FAQ document that addresses questions raised by the Planning
Commission and other City Boards and Commissions.
These documents are attached.
Staff will coordinate with the City Clerk and City Manager’s Office on next steps, specifically
when Commissioners will be expected to sign the code of conduct.
II. May 2, 2023 Council Meeting
At the May 2, 2023 City Council meeting, the Council approved the following item that was
previously reviewed by the Planning Commission -
Request of Joma Studio Architects for Property Located at 24-28 E. Campbell Avenue to
Allow Construction of a 3-Story, Approximately 8,000 Square-Foot Mixed-Use Building,
Consisting of Ground-Floor and 2Nd-Level (Mezzanine) Commercial/Office Space, and
Three 1-Bedroom Upper-Level Apartment Units. the Application Under Consideration
Includes a Planned Development Permit. File No.: PLN-2022- 79.
III. Planning Commission Agenda – Public Comment Time Limit Language
In coordination with Chair Buchbinder, staff incorporated into the Planning Commission
agenda language stating expectations on time limits for public speakers, mirroring the
language used on the City Council Agenda, as follows:
NOTE: Members of the public may be allotted up to two (2) minutes to comment on any
public hearing item. Applicants/Appellants and their representatives may be allotted up to
a total of five (5) minutes for opening statements and up to a total of three (3) minutes
Director’s Report for October 11, 2022 Page 2
maximum for closing statements. Items requested/recommended for continuance are
subject to Commission's consent at the meeting.
____________________________________________________________________________________ -1- Code of Conduct – City of Campbell Boards & Commissions April 4, 2023
Council Policy 1.34
Code of Conduct Policy
City of Campbell Board Members & Commissioners
Policy Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to establish rules for individuals who serve on one of the City of
Campbell’s (City) boards or commissions when there is a conflict of interest, including a perceived conflict of interest, with an item that is being or will be considered by the City Council or any City board or commission. Nothing in this policy shall be construed to deny any person the right to freedom of speech or freedom of peaceful assembly.
The provisions of this policy are in addition to any ethical obligations imposed by applicable law. Actual Conflict of Interest:
Pursuant to Chapter 2.40 of the Campbell Municipal Code, no City board member or commissioner shall make, participate in making, or in any way attempt to use their official position to influence a governmental decision in which they know or have reason to know they have a financial interest.
A board member or commissioner has a financial interest in a decision within the meaning of the California Political Reform Act if it is reasonably foreseeable that the decision will have a material financial effect, distinguishable from its effect on the public generally, on the board member or commissioner, on a member of their immediate family, or on any business entity, real property, or
source of income in which they have a direct or indirect investment. Perceived Conflict of Interest:
In addition to actual conflicts of interest, a member of a City board or commission shall not
participate in any decision in which the member has a perceived conflict of interest as defined in this policy. A perceived conflict of interest means a situation where a member of a City board or commission
is affiliated with a person or organization that has taken a position on a matter coming before the City Council or any City board or commission and the member would appear, to a reasonable and well-informed person, to have aligned their interest with that person or organization in such a way that would affect the independence, impartiality and objectivity of the member’s role as a City
board member or commissioner. Prohibited actions involving a perceived conflict of interest by member of a City board or commission may include, but not be limited to:
• Representing, appearing for, writing for, or speaking on behalf of a person or organization with which the member is affiliated on a matter that has come or will come before the City Council or any City board or commission; or
____________________________________________________________________________________ -2- Code of Conduct – City of Campbell Boards & Commissions April 4, 2023
• Representing, appearing for, writing for, or speaking on behalf of a person or organization with which the member is affiliated before another governmental agency on a matter
pending before that governmental agency and the matter has come, or the member should reasonably know the matter will come, before the City Council or any City board or commission, and on which the City has not made a final decision.
When a member of a City board or commission appears in front of, writes to, or speaks to another governmental agency on a matter pending before that governmental agency and the matter has come, or the member should reasonably know the matter will come, before the City Council or
any City board or commission, and on which the City has not made a final decision, the member shall clearly indicate they are appearing, writing or speaking as an individual and on their own behalf. Conference with City Attorney: Any board member or commissioner who is unclear on whether an actual or perceived conflict of interest exists shall confer with the City Attorney prior to taking any action outlined above.
When a Conflict is Deemed to Exist: When an actual or perceived conflict is deemed to exist on a particular matter, the board member or commissioner who has the conflict of interest shall not attempt to use their official position to
influence a governmental decision on that matter. In addition, the board member or commissioner shall publicly identify the conflict of interest and leave the room before the matter is discussed. Removal:
Any violation of this policy will be reported to the City Council for further action, including but not limited to removal of the board member or commissioner from their respective board or commission. Per Title 2 of the Campbell Municipal Code, board members and commissioners
may be removed by a majority vote of the City Council.
Code of Conduct FAQs: Page 1 of 2
April 4, 2023
Council Policy 1.34
Code of Conduct Policy
City of Campbell Board Members & Commissioners
FAQs – Perceived Conflicts of Interest
For purposes of these FAQs, “City” shall mean the City of Campbell and “board
members” and “commissioners” shall mean those members belonging to a City of
Campbell board or commission.
Question 1 What does it mean to say that a member of a City board or commission
is “affiliated” with a person or organization?
Response In this context, it means that the board member or commissioner is closely
connected with, associated with, or related to a particular person, group,
party, company, etc.
Question 2 If a member of a board or commission identifies a perceived
conflict of interest based on their membership in an advocacy
organization and items coming before the City Council, should they: (a)
recuse only on the item itself (b) step down from the board /
commission permanently or (c) step down from their membership in the
advocacy organization?
Response In each instance where a member believes a perceived conflict of interest
exists, the member should recuse themself from the specific item.
If a member is unclear whether the policy applies to the situation, the
member should consult with the City Attorney, as provided for in the policy.
Question 3 If a member of a board or commission is appointed to an organization
during their time on the board or commission and the appointment
could present a perceived conflict of interest in the future, should the
member immediately step down from the board or commission?
Response Perceived conflicts of interest should be considered when they are believed
to arise and, on a case-by-case basis. If at that time it is determined that a
perceived conflict of interest does in fact exist, the member should recuse
themself from the item being considered.
Question 4 If the City has taken a position on proposed state legislation, can a
member of a board or commission advocate separately regarding that
legislation?
Response Yes, if they do so as an individual and not as a member of the board or
commission and not as a representative speaking on behalf of the City.
Code of Conduct FAQs: Page 2 of 2
April 4, 2023
Question 5 Can a member of a board or commission, who is also a member of an
advocacy organization, advocate to another city (i.e., Cupertino) on an
issue (i.e., developing trails) before that city?
Response Yes, if they do not hold themselves out to that city as a member of a City
board or commission or represent that they are speaking on behalf of the
City of Campbell.
Question 6 If a member of a board or commission is part of an advocacy
organization and advocating on a certain issue, how would they know if
the issue will come before the City of Campbell’s Council in the future?
Response They likely won’t. Perceived conflicts of interest should be considered when
they arise and, on a case-by-case basis. If at that time, it is determined that
a perceived conflict of interest does exist, the member should recuse
themself from the item.
Question 7 Does this policy prohibit board members or commissioners from
participating in other non-City organizations?
Response The policy alone would not prohibit board members or commissioners from
participating in other non-City organizations.
Question 8 If a member of a board or commission is affiliated with a special
interest group, can that member represent the special interest group’s
position before the state on a matter that the board or commission has
already taken a position?
Response While a board member or commissioner may speak before the state as an
individual representing their own interests, they may not represent the City or
the special interest group before the state in a matter on which their
respective board or commission has already taken a position.