901 Campisi Way (PD83-06)
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
99 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 925 San Jose, California 95113
408-280-6600
MEMORANDUM TO:
FROM:
South Bay Construction & Development Company
Jeffrey P. Damon
DATE:
SUBJECT:
October 20, 1983
Traffic Analysis for the Proposed Campisi Way
Office Project
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. was retained by South Bay Construction
& Development Company to re~iew the anticipated traffic projections and
future intersection operations for key intersections which might be affected
if the proposed Campisi Way office development in Campbell, California was
to be constructed.
A significant amount of previous traffic analysis and base data has
already been conducted for similar projects in the area. It was utilized in
an effort to determine the anticipated trip generation rates for the
project, the directional distribution of trips generated by the project and
the key intersections which could be affected by the development.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The proposed project site is located in Campbell, California and
comprises 1.8 acres on Campisi Way. The site is currently vacant. To the
west of the site is the Los Gatos Creek channel and to the east is a
restaurant.
Critical roadways either currently serving the site or proposed to
serve the site upon completion of the project are Campisi Way, Hami lton
Avenue, Bascom Avenue, State Route 17 and Campbell Avenue.
Intersection Operations
Levels of service were calculated for four key intersections in the
study area which were determined to be the most critical in terms of
handl i ng the si te-generated traffi c. Barton-Aschman Associ ates, Inc.
conducted a new count at Hamilton/Salmar during the PM peak period on
Tuesday, October 11, 1983. Turning movement data was taken from previous
reports for projects in the area for two intersections. Count data for
Hamilton/Bascom was deri ved from an intersect ion count taken February 17,
1983 by the City of Campbell; the other two intersections were based on 1981
counts. Intersection levels of service were conducted for the PM peak hour
since this peak hour most often reflected the worst case.
[6]
1
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
The level of service (LOS) calculations were prepared utilizing the
Critical Movement Analysis, Planning Methodology as documented in Circular
212 IIDevelopment of an Improved Highway Capacity Manual.1I The consultó.nt
was directed by the city to use this methodology in calculating levels of
service. For these and the future LOS analyses, right turn volumes have
been reduced for the calculations by 45%. The manual provides the option of
reducing right turns (where a separate lane exists and a right turn on red
is permissible) depending upon local conditions.
The results of the existing levels of service for the four critical
intersections are presented in Table 1.
TABLE 1
EXISTING LEVELS OF SERVICE
INTERSECTION
LEVEL OF SERVICE
SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES /
MAX. SUM OF CRITICAL VOL.
@ LOS E (1375 vph)
0.84
Bascom/Campisi (PM)* D
Bascom/Campbell(PM)* D
Hamilton/Bascom(PM)** D
Hamilton/Salmar(PM)*** F
0.80
0.89
1.21
* Source: Count conducted by City of Campbell 8/81.
** Source: Count conducted by City of Campbell 2/17/83.
*** Source: Count conducted by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. 10/11/83.
Based on the assumptions and methodology previously noted, the existing
- levels of service range from a IIDII to an IIFII for the peak hour. Table 2
provides a definition of levels of service for urban intersections. It is
based on the 1965 Highway Capacity Manual.
FUTURE CONDITIONS
The project is proposed to be developed in one phase consisting of
34,194 square feet, with buildout occurring in 1984. Access to the site is
proposed from Campisi Way.
The analysis of the future conditions involved several tasks. In the
first task the project traffic was generated, distributed and assigned to
the adjacent roadway system. The second task involved estimating the
2
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
TABLE 2
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS
Level of Service
Interpretation
A,B
Uncongested operations; all queues clear in a single
signal cycle.
C
Light congestion;
approaches.
occasional backups on critical
D
Significant congestion on critical approaches but
intersection functional. Cars required to wait through
more than one cycle during short peaks. No long-
standing queues formed.
E
Severe congestion with some long-standing queues on
critical approaches. Blockage of intersection may
occur if traffic signal does not provide for protected
turning movem ents. Traffic queue may block nearby
intersection(s) upstream of critical approach(es).
F
Total breakdown, stop-and-go operation.
-3-
Barton-Aschman Assoc~ates, Inc.
background growth in traffic, as well as adding the trips generated by other
approved projects in the area. In the third phase, intersection levels of
service were calculated for two scenarios: 1984 w/o Project; and 1984
w/Project.
Trip Generation
As discussed previously, the base parameters including the trip
generation rates were taken from previous traffic studies conducted for
similar projects in this area by Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. These, and
all of the parameters, were discussed with city staff and accepted as
adequate by all parties.
The project is anticipated to generate a maximum of 12 Trip Ends (TE)
per 1,000 gross square feet (GSF) of office development (120TE/10,000 GSF)
with 20% of the trips occurring during the pm peak hour. The specific
generations for the project are presented in Table 3.
TABLE 3
TRIP GENERATION RATES
Buildout - 34.2K s.f.
12
410
PM PK-HR
(20%)
82
IN/OUT SPLIT
(20% In/80% Out)
16/66
SCENARIO
RATE
(/1000 s. f.)
ADT
Trip Distribution
The distribution of trips from the proposed project is a function of
access, roadway operation, roadway type (regional vs. local or sub-
regional), and the relative location of anticipated future residential land
uses (i.e., type and amounts). The distribution is presented in Table 4.
4
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
TABLE 4
DIRECTIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF SITE-GENERATED TRIPS
SCENARIO
REGIONAL
Project @ Buildout
20% Hamilton Ave. East
35% Bascom Ave. South
5% Bascom Ave. North
15% Hamilton Ave. West
Tota 1
20% S.R. 17 North
5% S. R. 17 South
100%
Background Traffic Growth
Background traffic is comprised of two variables: traffic related to
approved project-specific developments which are anticipated to affect the
key intersections and general traffic growth unrelated to any specific
project. The latter was estimated to be a 1.5% per year growth factor, while
the former was determined to be a function of two projects.
The ana lys is i nc 1 uded the projected traffi c from two projects i n the
study area which were determined to affect one or more of the analyzed
intersections. The first project was the recently approved Greylands
Business Park (and the future residences remaining to be constructed) to be
located on the Ainsley property in the northeast quadrant of the
Bascom/Hamilton intersection. The traffic generated from this development
was determined from the Greylands Business Park-Traffic Impact Analysis
prepared by George S. Nolte and Associates. Refer to the Analysis and the
unnumbered figure IIPM Assignment of Peak-Hour Traffic Generated by Greylands
Business Park and by Future Residences on Remaining Ainsley Propertyll. The
only other approved project at this time is an approximate 50,000 square
foot office development on Campisi Way. The traffic from this project was
generated and distributed on the roadway system using the same factors
utilized for this analysis. .
The IIfuture conditionsll were developed by adding the background traffic
growth (1.5% per year) and the lIapproved tripsll to the existing traffic
counts. The lIapproved tripsll are those trips generated by projects in the
area that have been identified as approved for development (at the time of
this analysis). The project-generated traffic was, in turn, added to these
volumes and the resultant volumes were analyzed for the future levels of
5
Barton-Aschman Associates,~nc.
service.
Projected Intersection Operations
The above information was compiled and the projected intersection
operations were determined using the Circular 212, Planning Methodology as
discussed previously. Similar assumptions were made regarding right turn
reductions as well. The results of these analyses are presented in Table 5.
TABLE 5
PROJECTED INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE (PM PEAK HOUR)
INTERSECTION
1984 w/o Project
LOS Sum CV/Max CV*
1984 w/Project
LOS Sum CV/Max CV*
Bascom/Campisi E
Bascom/Campbell D
Hami Hon/Bascom E
Hamilton/Salmar F
* CV = Critical Volume
0.917
0.844
E 0.937
D 0.849
E 0.963
F 1. 345
0.951
1.341
CONCLUSIONS
The purpose of this traffic analysis was to document the projected
traffic generation and intersection operations which could be expected based
on the assumptions and intersection methodology contained herein. The
intersection level of service analyses were conducted using the Circular
212, Planning Methodology. Based on the assumptions noted, future
intersections are expected to operate at levels IIDII through IIF" regardless
of whether the project is constructed.
Intersection level of service analyses were conducted for the same
intersections and scenarios using the City of San Jose Capacity methodology
for comparison. This was felt to be particularly necessary for two reasons.
First, the Bascom/Hamilton intersection is mutually controlled by both the
City of Campbell and San Jose. Projects which might affect the intersection
are generally analyzed using both methodologies. Second, the alternative
methodology provides for a comparison at critical intersections which may
not be adequately replicated by the Circular 212 methodology. As such, the
following table presents the level of service analyses for the four
intersections using the San Jose computer-assisted methodology.
6
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc.
TABLE 6
PROJECTED INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE* (PM PEAK HOUR)
EXISTING 1984 W/O PROJECT 1984 W/PROJECT
INTERSECTION LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C
Bascom/Campisi C 0.752 D 0.821 D 0.832
Bascom/Campbell B 0.670 C 0.714 C 0.719
Hamilton/Salmar E 0.947 F 1.050 F 1. 051
Hamilton/Bascom C 0.758 D 0.839 D 0.849
* Using City of San Jose Methodology.
Based on the data presented in Table 6, the intersections are projected
to operate at level of service IICII through IIFII regardless of whether the
project is constructed. At the only intersection operating below IIDII
levels, Hamilton & Salmar, the actual projected change in the volume-to-
capacity ratio is anticipated to be 0.00l.
No specific mitigations are suggested as the intersections projected to
operate below IIDII levels will do so regardless of whether this project is
constructed or not.
! '
7
RECEIVEP
FEB 13 Fj84
~ ~¿:~
,.;;J
~-. (/;'7 ¿.
Santa Clara Valley Water DistricE
~6/~
PUbu,.J
HIG\i'\.
5750 ALMADEN EXPRESSWAY
SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95118
TELEPHONE (408) 265-2600
February J 0, 1984
i'/1r. David Pines
South Bay Construction
&:: Development Company
511 Division Street
Campbell, CA 95008
Dear 1\'Jr. Pines:
We have reviewed the site plan for an office nuilding at °10 Campisi Way sent to us on
.Tanuary 24.
Development would not he affected by any Santa Clara Valley Water District facility.
Site drainage is shown to be connected to an existing l8-inch R.C.P. which we assume
must outfall to Los Gates Creek. We have reviewed plans and issued Permit No. ~3321
for the construction pfàï1Mfiéê--5Uildiniï;ÓriCø.m'pisi Way between this site Rnd Los
Gatos Creek. No exi$ting 18-irych n .C.P .'- was shþwnon these plans. In 1 oJ~O, we issued
Permit 80310 to the City of Cpmpbell: for an--l8-inch óutfall into the creek which was
later changed to a 12';'inch. '.\l eihelieveJthat the l8-ine!þ line shown is actually a 1 ~-inch
line and may affect the reqÜlremehlS-fÓr drainage. . . - .. '\
Sincerely, ~tc, i l ,?
I I P
i (r"11
,j- u
ORrGINAL SIGNED BY
W. F. Carlsen
Division Enp;ineer
Design Coordination Division
ß~ (i, -L/.~ ~.¿/. ~ ~,L
.,
t~~ /Z-' .
cc:
ì\lr. Arthur A. I\ee
Director of Planning
City of Campbell
75 North Central Avenue
CampDell, CA C1500€
tßlr. Joseph Elliott
DirectoroCPuî)TIc Works
City of Camobell
75 North Central Avenue
Campbell, CA ?~OO8
AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
ORDINANCE m. 1494
BEING AN ORDINA.N:E OF 1HE CI'IY CDUNCIL OF TIΠCITY OF
CAMPBELL AOOPTING PLANS, ELEVATIONS, DEVELOPMENT SæEDULE,
AND CDNDITIONS OF APPROVAL roR 1HE PLANNED DEVELOPHENT
ZONE ESTABLISHED BY ORDINANCEOF 1HE CITY OF CAMPBELL
(APPLICATION OF SOUIHBAY CDNSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
mHPANY, MR WILLIAM JURY, PD 83-06).
The City CmIDcil of the City of Campbell does ordain as follows:
SECTION ONE: That the Zoning Map of the City of Campbell is hereby
changed and amended by adopting the attached Exhibit A entitled Plans
and Elevations; Exhibit B entitled Development Schedule; Exhibit C
entitled Map of Said Property; and Exhibit D entitled Conditions of
Approval, as per the application of Southbay Construction md Development
Company on property known as 910 Campisi Way in a Planned Development
Zoning District. Copies of said Exhibits are on file in the Office of
the Planning Department.
SECTION 1WO: This ordinance shall become effective 30 days follow-
ing its passage and adoption and shall be published once wi thin 15 days
upon passage and adoption in the Campbell Press, a newspaper of general
circulation in the City of Campbell, ColIDty of Santa Clara.
PASSED AND AOOPTED this 20th day of December
following roll call vote:
1983 , by the
AYES: ColIDcilmen: Chamberl in, Ashworth, Doetsch, Kotowsk i, Paul
NOES: ColIDcilmen: None
ABSENT: ColIDcilmen: None
ATTEST:
~#~
G. mYNE, CITY ERK
¡',.'" ',J i_; ....
..\.1,:'" -~~~
'¡,,'¡
"
'..:. a JJI. -~ -'
-, /1..i ~
:A::D_--I~)~,<)R3 --
EXHIBIT B
STANDARD DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE
FILE NO: PD 83-06
APPLI CANT: .ruRY, W. - Smm-mAY mNSTRUCfrON m.
SITE ADDRESS: 910 CAMPISI WAY
l.
2.
Construction to begin within six months of final approval.
Construction to be completed within one year of starting
date.
NOTE: Above development schedule is a standard used by the
Planning Department when applicant has not submitted a schedule
for his project.
.I- ..1 -', ',ç
\ . \: .. c::
.\\~ ; { :
..~._.
r ..
DJ IT BIT C - HI\P OF S^ I!1 PROPFRn'
PlmLlC IrFAIUNC, fIELD BITORJ: '!lIT: PLANNTNC
m~ ¡II !I SS TON ON NOVFJ m EJ( R, 1983. RES . NO .
22 36 AIDPl1:D REm~lJr:NDING APPROVN" OF
Of-FIG; BlJILDINc. (VOTE: )-0-0).
.
...~
-
-
- ---="<- -
..
~
t
r4;~71[; ~<:
.. / / Gi-:'::
~ :;1.,/'::
,,"'; / ì V¡
. .' ~ '
: '" I
JI
'I'
1/' -'
.:l/
II
/ /
//1
/
, '"
....
...
.,n.
0
PD
~3-06
:!
f:ii§5t-~
::D
g
~
'"
~
!';;"\...,
~ ži,) ::D
! I -
! ¡:;
I .~
: I š;
II ~~
¡;:~
.
¡;.~
-- ,- . -'-
~
~
I.IJ
I.IJ
a:
&..
L!
(;;\
~
r
AOOAe~' -'"
It 011 I,
...r.~ 1--
1 tom.... 10('
,.. !:L- - '-M
!::
I.IJ
...
::I
0
a:
.",,4( or,
,
-'"
;~
f; -
"
~ r--
"I:t ~
~~..
~
,.. .....
,.... - .
,
-
~ ::
" ~ r;
, - I
I ...
I
J:
.""
u
rn_n__u__-
,
,
,
.: PCL ... \¡¡:
".... :,1 .D. ""':
-: !!:..:.-
PCL. I '00' '"
,
-... .1,..
--------
,
~:
.... -
UIT 8c. "" -
I
"08 Ae.
-,-'- -
, .. A- on I
-I ,
0.. Ae lifT .
.
... .
- -
onT At lifT
'..
/9
':1
-L
~
'I - I
LN t_-- ~
,----
/I
0'" '" ...,
~;;r
J
0 "ue I€'
II
l-,- !~-'
I-. f ¡:
~ --,' -,
ooue ..,
~
þ:
t ...
r r
¡! ::
t"
....t o.J
1
r t-'"
, ...
l . !L--.J
{.--- -- -
~
'~A' lot 1If' .", 8C OI(T
--.- -r -_!,,'-....
010 at 8{'
. S ... :!
'!'
I
L-. ._~--=--.J...
J
... ,..",
r....,1ILu.-
..
- A"
-- AVE
~ f t ...
~- .
'"
" n
~ ~ (" 0
,. r . - E
__'-'~~ i
~ . ,
..., !
. I
& '
, .f
i~.;.
-í" -
-~ \i'
~ -\
.' \\ .
\il\ .
"
l -:.~.
Q
\,
~
~
I:
i
"" , ~
,'.
~ ~ ¡:
I~
r
0 f
r [
.
. f
- ?
i
,
I
WAY
--..ï
,
.,'
. ,
i' .:;
~
!
,
'" .
.. .
.. :
-,-
"
,. '.0.
@
:a
0
LJ
'"
..
..
I
t < _RIOGrLEY.-
. OIl.
!II 2s'ë II '4' ~
,
...
~
I
@
,
t'~c.~
oWE.
I
0
1
-œ-
1
,- ...0
:a
0
LJ
...
C
..
I
t' -.!E.!~ ELL
I
:I:
..
~
0
...
,"'....
-=::~- ---
EXlIIBIT D
CONe I T IONS OF APPROVAL: PO 83-06
APPL I CA T I ON OF: JURY, W. - SOtm-IBAY illNSTRlJCTION
Page 1
n/a
A -
B
c
n/a
D
E
F
n/a
G
H-
*n/a:
P.c. ~ITr..: 11/8/83
Revised elevations and/or site plan to be approved by the Planning
Director upón recommendation of the Architectural Advisor, within
30 days of the Planning Commission approval. .
Revised elevations and~ site plan to be approved by the Site &
Architectural Review Committee " with-
in 30 days of Planning Commission approval.
Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in
red on plans. landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in
accordance with the approved plans.
Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and
location of irrigation system to be submitted for approval of the
Site & Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission
prior to application for a building permit. .
Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and
location of irrigation system to be submitted for approval of the
Planning Director prior to application for a building permit.
Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to
be submitted for approval of the Planning Director prior to applica-
tion for building permit.
Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the
amount of $10.000 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping
of parking areas within 3 months of completion of construction; or
(2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing and strip-
ing of parking areas prior to application for a building permit.
Applicant to submit a plan, prior to installation of PG&E utility
(transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and
screening(if boxes are aboveground) for approval of the Planning
Di recto r .
Applicant to
limiting the
office use,
use, and
issuance of a
submit a letter, satisfactory to the City Attorney,
use of the property to: square feet of
square feet of speculative industrial
square feet of warehouse use, prior to
building permit.
All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be
screened as approved by the Planning Director.
Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements
are installed.
not applicable to this application.
CONDIT IONS OF APPROVAL: PD 83-06
APPLI CAT ION OF: SOU1HBAY CrnSTRUCITON
Page 2
The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is re~uired
to meet the following. conditions in accordance with Ordinance of the City of
Campbell and Laws of the State of California. -
-I
J
K
L
t>1
N
0
n/a
n/a
All parking and driveway areas to be developed in comnliance with
Section 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces
to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper quards.
Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section
20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code.
Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall
indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground
utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and tele-
vision cables, etc.
Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of
the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until
application is approved and permit issued by the Building Depart-
ment (Section 21.68.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code).
Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that
any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, qarbage,
wet garbaqe and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of
Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This
requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apart-
ment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing,
and construction establishments.
Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the
development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire De-
partment. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of
a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have
self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department.
All enclosures to be constructed at grade level.
Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City re-
quirements for the handicapped.
Noise levels for the interior of residential units shall comply
with minimum State (Title 25) and local standards as indicated
in the Noise Element of the Campbell General Plan.
Applicant is hereby notified that he will be required to pay
Park Dedication In-Lieu Fee which will be assessed at the time
the subdivision map is submitted.
STANDARD FIRE HAZARD ABATEMENT COMMENT: The applicant is hereby notified that
the property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds,
until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures shall
be kept secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolish-
ed or removed from the property. Sect. 11.201 & 11.414,1979 Ed. Uniform Fire Code.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: PD 83-06
APPLI CATION OF: SOlffilBAY OONSTRUCfION
Page 3
PUBLI C WORKS DEPARD1ENT
P.
Submit a traffic impact analysis concentrated on the intersections
of Bascom Ave. with Campisi Way and Hamilton Ave.
Obtain an excavation permit for all work within the street right-of-way.
Q.
BUILDING DEPARDŒNT
R.
Roof covering shall be fire retardant.
FI RE DEP AR'IMENT
S.
Provide an automatic fire extinguisher system.
1226 G.P.M.
Required Fire Flow =
T.
Provide 2A-lOBC fire extinguishers.
u.
Sprinkler system to be monitored by a licensed central station.
v.
The sprinkler F.D.C. to be located adjacent to the existing fire
hydrant, in front of the development.
The applicant is notified that he/she shall comply with all applicable Codes or
Ordinances of the City of Campbell which pertain to this development and are not
herein specified.