65 Cristich Ln. (63-15)
RECEIPT
CITY OF CAMPBELL
CAMPBELL. CALIFORNIA
L t"1 /' I
Date ,1' v} ,¡. 19~
Name / ~ d // ß(JL7. ¿h-
Address .l,' aJ ;/'...) /XI';o{¡.[ ~j .
., ~ .
~~J \/(J £.. (/~./ ¿-/
-' .:/ t
RECEIVED
Dollars
l. I. c.'
//.:;S-;; ~ .
::::d¡;'! :~HL;~ <I~:~
[
Cents ~J¿) Ff
i ~
<. :;.J c.
Fund
l~-I
6570
By-
CI..-y CLEF;!K
"I
V
., .
~~,
All that certain real property situate in the City of Campbellj
County of Santa ClõLb, Stdt~ of California, described as follow~:
PARCEL ONE
BS::;INNING at the point of intersection of the Easterly line of '~'C'
West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 35, Township 7 South, ;,,', }'1
1 West, M.D.B. 8. M., with a line which is parallel with and d1~,t,; ~
Northerly 100.00 feet measured at right angles from the South~r!'
line of that certa~n parcel of land described as Parcel One in t~
Deed to David E. Smith, at ux, recorded October 1, 1948'1n Eoo!.:
1685 of Official Records, page 70, Santa Clara County Records: tri.. ,,'
from said point of beginning North 0° 27' West along the said E-::,.:~ i:" ',:.'
line of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 3~ for a dj' '"
of 168.37 feet: thence 1eavinq said last mentioned U.'ne and run;"
South 89° 11' West and parallel with the Southerly line of said:: 1:,',1
One for a distélnce o(-~ feet to an iron pi.pe set in the S() '...-¡
eastsrly line of thðt~ parcel of land desclibe~ as Parc~l '
in the Leed from David E. ~mith. et ux, to the State of Califoln5"
dated Junf>. l2, 1956, recorded August 22, 1956 in Book 3585 of GILL ¡.d
Records, pa')4=>. 363, Santa Clara County Recol'ds; thenc;e South 11° .,";
West al~ng +he Southeasterly line of Parcel One $0 described in tr
Deed to said State of Califòrnia for ô oistance of 172.27 feet t,)
iron pipe 'Nhich bears South 89° 11' West (along a line drawn pdT ( ¡
wi th the Soútherl y line of said Parcel One so described in the C,>¡,-,
to said Smi th) from the said point of beginning; thence North 89r' ; ~
East alar\') said parallel line for a distance of 145.31 feet to t;:~"
of befjinnln<j, as surveyed and monumented in December, 1962 by Jer)¡' ' ,
Me Dermott Engineering.
, ,
PARCEL TI'JQ
A non-exclusive right of way appurtenant to the above described ;-",-,
One, over a strip of land l~ feet in width 1 ying Westerl y of and
adjoining the Easterly line of the West half of the Southwest quèJr"
of Section 35. Township 7 South. Range 1 West. M.D.M. and extendiny
from the property hereinabove described a s Parcel One to Casey Ro,:'d.
,',
.
.. .
....
I
RESOLUTION NO.
1533
BEING A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF JACK M. FARNHAM AGREEMENT.
WHEREAS, there has been submitted to the City Council
by Jack M. Farnham an agreement for the development of
his real property in accordance with prescribed conditional and
WHEREAS, by the terms of said aqreement, and concurrently
herewith he has submitted grant deeds of certain portions of
h1s~operty for street purposes;
NOWu TdEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council
that the Mayor be and he is hereby authorized to execute the
said agreement on behalf of said City; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the grant deed submitted
in connection therewith be and the same is hereby accepted.
PASSED AND ADOPTED ~his
8th
day of
July
19 63
, by the following vote:
AYES:
Councilmen:
Doetsch, McElroy, Rogers, weitzel, Llco
NOES:
Councilmen:
None
ABSENT:
Councilmen: None
APPROVED:
.
Peter B. Lico, Mayor
ATTEST:
~/
/. v'-~ O'~'
M<'" <\'\~ØØ ~
6~. y,.'
Dorothy Trevethan, City Clerk
J.I¡,_.1: cb
3/29/63
fETITION FOR THE ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION
OF IMPROVEMENTS PURSUANT TO SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
AND ASSESSMENT BOND ACTS, Al.'lD WAIVER OF
PROCEEDINGS UNDER DIVIS!ON 4 OF THE STREETS AND
HIGHWAYS CODE.
CRISTICH LANE FROM MCGLINCEY LANE
TO 1500 FT. NORTH OF MCGLINCEY LANE
To the Honorable City Council
of the City of Campbell
Campbell, California
Gentlemen:
The undersigned respectfully petition your Honorable Body
and shown as follows:
1. That they are the owners of the property set opposite
their names.
2. That they respectfully petition you to take proceedings
and issue bonds pursuant to appropriate special assessment and
assessment bond acts for the following acquisitions and improvements.
The improvement of Cristich Lane by acquisition of land
and easements necessary to provide a GO-ft. right of way; the
construction of base and pavement; concrete curbs and gutters;
installation of a sanitary sewer line, manholes, and laterals
to serve adjacent properties, with appurtenances; installation of
storm sewer lines, manholes, catch basins, cross drains, and
appurtenances; installation of street lights.
3. That you assess the cost of said acquisitions and improve-
ments, together with the expenses incidental thereto, qpon the lands
fronting on said ~rovements and benefited thereby.
4. That we authorize you to exercise your proper discretion
as vested in you pursuant to said acts, to make changes and
modifications in said work prior to or during the course of said
proceedings.
5. That the taking of proceedings under Division 4 of the
streets and Highways Code in regard thereto, is hereby waived.
Respectfully submitted,
. . ,~, ADDRESS ~
Je'.; /j¡J, ,1h< vyl¡.¡. , /53/7 1f",j,'"(Í".( Y;//j/63
(j{)#n~ j \hz~p¿ /;ii ~~ ~~~
"'I
co
"'I
"-
.,
ClI
I<)
"'I
Ii
o'
14/
~
...J
>-
...J
Q:o
14/
¡...
'"
q
'"
~
¡...
~
0
en
o..w 0/... OS, ~
I
I
E LINE OF W 1/2
S 8901l'W
R/S 155 MAPS 21'
J.M, aD J, FARNHAM
O.R.5852/537
N 89° II E
O.R,1685/70
I
109.90'
145.31
211. 84'
229.56'
~,"\AO
~
-...
N
0
0
z
r"
I
...
5' ' \.,."C
¡£ G\."'~
.. -
LAND TO BE GRANTED TO THE
CITY OF CAMPBELL
I Land to be granted to City
to-
...
.,
c
~
w
.
-... C
III
, . -'
0'.
'!
z
u
-
too
.
-
C
U
~
...
N
o
0
Z
,.
,)
~
\ì
Prepared by the Office of the City
Engineer, Campbell, California
DAN 8Y J, J. 4, CHKD BY W¿/,'
May 1. 1963
Mr. Jack M. Farnham
15572 Woodard Road
San Jose, California
Dear Sir:
In response to your letter of April 22. 1963, the following
points are offered as explanation to the qeustions you have raised:
1. It would appear that you are in error in regard to the
existence of sanitary mains in the street. I'm sure that if you
check further you will find the need for the inclusion of this
facility on the petition.
2. In the case of the storm drainage, a figure of $765.00
per net acre is applied to all properties being developed or
subdivided within the City, and i8 made a condition of their
building permit applications or subdivision map approvals, as the
case may be. This figure represents the average unit cost per
acre for an in-ground storm system which will adequately serve a
drainage area. complete, to outfall. In your case, an assessment
was previously collected for the Union Avenue storm project. In that
project. the assessments to vacant properties were not considered
the ulttmate since the policy established by the County for that
assessment district was that developed prqperties only were as.essed
their full share and that vacant properties were assessed but a
percentage of their full shaze. The $150.00 requirement which is
now made a condition of your building permit represents the difference
between the Union Avenue assessment and the $765.00/acre standard fee.
The total of these will, of course. be credited to any future
assessment which might arise out of the'formation of the McGlincey
Lane assessment district.
3. The term of the bond is rather indefinite as far as the
City is concerned, considering the nature of the area involved.
A two-year bond would seem appropriate provided it was understood
that performance upon the bond would be called if it were not extended
beyond such time.
Mr. Jack M. Parnham
-2-
May 1, 1963
An estimate of the costs involved
has not been prepared as yet, however,
that they would be $15 - $20 per front
i8 representative ðf this figure.
It is hoped that this clarifies the questions
raised. Please contact the undersigned if further
desired.
in the full improvement8
it might be a8sumed
foot. The bond amount
you have
di8cussion is
Sincerely yours,
MYRON D. HAWK,
CITY ENGINBER
By William G. wren,
Assistant City Engineer
WOW: cb
.. ~-'
April 22, 1963
City of Campbell
75 North Central Avenue
Campbell, California
Attention:
William G. Wren, Assistant City Engineer
Re:
Commercial Development -
65 Cristich Lane
Gentlemen:
I am in receipt of your letter of March 29, 1963
relative to the development of my property at 65 Cristich Lane,
Campbell.
In accordance with your request, I have executed a
grant deed of the front twenty-five feet of the property for
street purposes. However, before the deed is delivered to
you, there appears to be several questions in my mind relative
to the agreement which you request me to sign, which I
believe should be clarified.
1. The petition for assessment proceedings includes
a request for sanitary sewer lines, manholes,
laterals, storm sewer lines, catch basins and cross
drains.
We would like to have a clarification of the
request for such improvements since the sanitary
sewers are already in existence and we have already
been assessed for storm drainage facilities. It
appears to us that in those respects we should only
be required to provide such connections and drains
as are necessary for our property but not be
required to be a part of a general assessment district
for such areawide improvements.
We would also believe it wise that we be furnished
with the proposed assessment district costs in order
that we can ascertain what the estimated costs will be
before we proceed. It seems to us that the assess-
ment district, if formed, should be limited to
street improvements.
City of Campbell
Apri122, 1963
Page Two
2. In the agreement to be signed by us we note
that we are required to pay a storm drainage fee
of $150.00. We would like to know why you are
requiting us to pay for storm drainage improve-
ments in an assessment proceedings and also a
storm drainage fee.
3. In the agreement we agree that if the assess-
ment district is not successful prior to July 30,
1964, we will be required to install the street
improvements when requested by the City Council
and to give a bond to assure that we will do
such work. There is no time limitation as to
the length of time we will be required to keep
the bond in effect and we believe that such a
limitation should be specified, preferably
a two-year bond.
The reason we are requesting the above clarification
is that we are granting to the City property of approximately
4200 square feet which is of a value of not less than $1.00".
per square foot. Under thee ircums tances , we believe that
since we are willing to grant to the City that amount of property
of such value, we believe that we are being most cooperative and
do not feel that we should pay for more than our fair share,
especially in those cases where the property owner, while paying
a share of the assessment district costs, will receive fair
compensation forhis land taken, which will not result in our
case. In other words, it appears we will be paying for more
than our share of the improvements as it now stands and we
therefore feel that a revision of our obligations to obtain
a building permit should be modified.
Sincerely yours,
./
.,- ,.
~ ,
,'.
~
. ~/"'4~ÞJ
,~p
~r/
9t( tJØ: I. 5' fJ
"
1.
COND ~TJ ONS ATTACHED TO "S" APPROVAL OF JACK FARNHAM FOR COHMERC IAL
GARAGE FOR USE IN TRUCK1NG BUSINESS TO BE LOCATED AT 6S'~CLINt!¥ LAHEo
(7 ~I srl'C:~
1 .
Dedication to Crlstlch Lane P18n Line
2. Agreement to enter Into future assessment ~Istrlct
3.
4.
Improvement Bond in the amount of $2.500
StOMa Drain Fee In amount of $150.00
PLANNiNG COHHISSjON,
C¡TV OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORN¡A
March 2'. 1963
tY~þ~
Orville Overen.
City Planner
~~
..-
& -
'~
URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
CITY OF CAMPBE~L, CALIFORNIA
TO:
APPLI CANTS FOR EPR~ Uin I: II Ii -QR ~JI!I(j I'IlRJ\~S
The name (s) and Recorder's Number, of legal owner (s) of subject property must
be supplied as part of application.
A photo copy of deed may be submitted for this
information.
Please fill in necessary information:
Jack M. J'arDbam
Name (s) as shown on Deed
DODDa J. J'arnham
Name (s) as shown on Deed
# 2322458
Recorder's Number
For Office Use Only
Filed as part of application for
for
Filed ;¿k/w3
/
by-&:{/
""'.