Loading...
430 Darryl Dr. (88-15) L. q. -I- 7 :;- Donald C. Wimberly July 13, 1988 Gary Kruger (oØ c..- DMV Office Proposed at 430 Darryl Drive I have reviewed the proposed California DMVoffice traffic assessment prepared by Barton - Aschman Associates. I concur with the technical work and findings of the assessment. I have also concluded that the DMV office would cause a greater traffic. impact upon the Hamilton and Darryl Drive intersection than the typical office. If the proposed use of the building were an office or a less public - service type of government office, the new peak hour trips generated by the use would not exceed 60% of the peak hour trips of the peak trips generated by the DMV office. The. existing operation of the intersection is deficient because there is insufficient capacity for the west bound left turns. Consequently, these left turns back into the westbound through lanes on Hamilton at Darryl Drive. The DMV office will exacerbate this deficient operation, and will also cause the northbound Darryl Drive approach to operate unsatisfactorily. This also affects the operation of southbound Darryl Drive which will now need a left turn phase to correct the problem. The increment of the impacts due to the DMV office over a typical office is 40%. In that 35% of the traffic in the critical movements is DMV traffic, their fair share is 40% of 35%, or 14% of the following measures: 1. Signal heads for northbound southbound left turns. Controller modifications and communications. Hard wire interconnect with the San Tomas Expressway signal controller. New loop cuts on Darryl Drive to detect traffic in the restriped approach lanes. Restriping on Darryl Drive for a northbound right turn lane and southbound left turn lane. right turns and 2. 3. 4. 5. We are developing cost estimates on the above measures. With respect to the conditions on parking, I recommend that DMV set aside 13 spaces for employees and mark them as such, and provide the recommended 46 additional spaces for GEK: CMBLMEMO.048 Don Wimberly, DMV Mitigation July 13, 1988 Page 2 customers. In that the traffic analysis states that 62 of the 71 spaces on site will be leased to DMV, the demand and supply appear to be well matched. However, the remaining 7,000 square feet of space will only have access to eleven spaces. Typical office parking demand ranges from one to over four spaces per thousand square feet, the potential added parking demand from the remaining 7,000 square feet in the building could exceed site parking supply by about twenty spaces. Therefore, I recommend that a condition be placed upon the lease of the site to DMV that the city must review and the parking demand for any new tenants in the building prior to their executing a lease agreement. GEK: CMBLMEMO.048 MEMORANDUM CITY OF CAMPBELL To: Bill Helms Date: July 8,1988 From: Gary Kruqer h ~ Subject: DHV Traffic Assessment, Recommended Conditions on Development ---------------------------------------------------------- I have reviewed the final report, "site Traffic Analysis for a Proposed CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES OFFICE in Campbel'l at 430 Darryl Drive" as submitted by Fanelli Consulting based upon technical work by Barton-Aschman Associates. I concur with the findings of the report, and generally, with the recommendations for mitigation. I do not agree, however, with the claim that "none of these recommendations are required mitigations for the approval of this project." This is because, simply, the project will cause a significant additional degradation to the current operation of westbound Hamilton traffic due to more frequent and longer backups of left turn traffic into the through lanes. To gain the flexibility needed in retiming the signal to ~ffset this existing problem, we need the rechannelization of Darryl Drive as well as the interconnection of the intersection with the controller at the San Tomas Expressway and Hamil ton. The proj ect makes these improvements more urgent. The following paragraphs contain my recommendations on the conditions that should be imposed upon DMV or the property owner to correct prior to occupancy. 1. Parking: The analysis is conservative in that the estimate is based upon one car per visitor, whereas, I'm certain that there will be a~average of 1.2 persons per car. The maximum likely visitors' car accumulation is about 38 cars rather than 46. However, about 13 employees' cars will also need to be parked upon the site for a total of 53 spaces. The 62 spaces should serve adequately. I would require DMV to set aside and mark 13 employee parking stalls on site. 2. sianal ImDrovements: The need for signal revisions and timing changes are partially the result of the proposed use. I propose that the ci ty require a fair share contribution from the property owner or DMV to make the needed signal modifications. Approximately 36% of the traffic on the critical movements . ' . '. () 'I r' GEK: CMBLMEMO.046 Bill Helms, DMV Development Conditions July 8, 1988 Page 2 requiring mitigation are from the DMV office in the p.m. peak. Therefore, we should ask for a minimum of 36% of the costs of mitigation. However, we wouldn't be doing this work at all, otherwise, so I propose that we ask for an added contribution to pay for the staff time the city has contributed and will contribute in the future. This amount is probably on the order of $2,000. The signal improvements needed are: a. b. c. d. e. f. Install one right turn signal head for north bound right turns, so that a "California overlap" may be provided. This will reduce the green time needed for the northbound phase, and this translates to added time to clear the west bound left turns. Install one left turn signal head for south bound left turns from Darryl Drive. Install interconnect conduit and cable to signal controller at the San Tomas Expressway. the Install a dialup modem and phone drop to the controller at Darryl Drive and Hamilton. Complete appropriate modifications to the signal controller at Darryl Drive and Hamilton to accommodate interconnection with STEX, and also to operate in a time base coordination mode with the new signal at Llewellyn. New loop cuts on Darryl Drive to match the new channelization. 3. .. Channelization: The restriping of the turning lanes on Darryl Drive should be entirely paid by the DMV or property owner. cc: Don Wimberly GEK: CMBLMEMO.046 . , ---- CITY OF CANIPßEIl 70 NORTH FIRST STREET CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 (408) 866-2100 Department: Planning July 28, 1988 Mr. William Piedemonte 30 Miranda Ct. Hillsborough, CA 94010 RE: 430 Darryl Dr. M 88-15 Dear Mr. Piedemonte: The Planning Commission, at its meeting of July 26, 1988, approved the above-referenced modification to allow the DMV to occupy 8,000 sq.ft. of the building at 430 Darryl Dr. This approval is subject to conditions as indicated on the attached list. Please note Condition #2 which requires Planning Commission approval prior to leasing the remainder of the building, and Condition #9 which requires approval of an agreement for 15 off-site parking spaces prior to DMV occupying the building. Also note that there will be a 6-month review of the parking and traffic circulation for this use. This approval will become effective on August 5, 1988, unless an appeal is filed prior to that date. If you have questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at 866-2140. Sinc~rely, ARTHUR A. KEE PLANNING DIRECTOR ~~ PLANNER I I ld Enc: Revised conditions cc: Virginia Fanelli, Fanelli Consulting, 1175 Saratoga Ave., #17, San Jose . II' Ma. J1111_J'.tÞJfJi -'11'.' Fire Department CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE U M 88-15 SITE ADDRESS: 430 Darryl Dr. APPLICANT: Piedemonte, W. PC MTG DATE: 7-26-88 The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is, required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. 1. Revised elevations and/or site plan indicating canopy structure to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor prior to application for a building permit. 2. Remaining 7,200 sq.ft. of building shall not be leased until such use has been approved by the Planning Commission. A major consideration in determining the allowable uses will be the parking demand generated. 3. All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. 4. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. 5. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by Planning and Building Departments (Section 21.53 of the Campbell Municipal Code). 6. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. 7. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 8. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE # M 88-15 SITE ADDRESS: 430 Darryl Dr. APPLICANT: Piedemonte, W. PAGE 2. 9. PLANNING DEPARTMENT Prior to building occupancy, applicant to submit agreement for the approval of the Planning Director and City Attorney, indicating the provision of 15 additional off-site parking spaces to be used by DMV employees. 10. Driving test to be directed towards Hamilton Ave. Test shall not be conducted on neighboring residential streets, including W. Latimer Ave., Gale Dr., and Springfield Dr. 11. Motorcycle skills test in parking lot to be conducted only 2 mornings a week. These parking spaces shall be made available for customer parking at all other times. 12. DMVemployees to park in designated off-street spaces only, and not on the public streets. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 13. Mitigate traffic impacts at Darryl Dr. and Hamilton Ave. by installing: A. signal heads for northbound rught turns and southbound left turns; controller modifications and communications; hardwire interconnect with San Tomas Expressway signal controller; new loop cuts in Darryl Dr. to detect traffic in the retriped approach lanes. B. C. D. 14. Restrip Darryl Dr. for a northbound right turn and southbound left turn lanes. 15. Provide 13 parking spaces on-site designated and reserved for employees. BUILDING DEPARTMENT 16. Plans are incomplete. plans: A. FIRE DEPARTMENT Items below shall be shown on construction B. Doors along one hour corridor shall be rated to maintain the one rating (Re 3304- 1985 UBC). Lighting fixtures in corridor to be rated or covered to maintain one hour protection; or Walls of corridor to extend to roof line. Exit lighting to be shown on plan. Construction plans to have energy certification. Handicap certification to be made on construction plans. Mechanical plan is required showing existing and new. Show mechanical on roof. C. D. E. F. G. H. 17. Plans shall comply with any Uniform Building Code or Uniform Fire Code required.