PC Min 07/22/1997CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
7:30 P.M. TUESDAY
JULY 22, 1997
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
The Planning Commission meeting of July 22, 1997 was called to order at 7:30 p.m., in the
Council Chambers, 70 North First Street, Campbell, California by Chairwoman Keams, and
the following proceedings were had, to wit:
ROLL CALL
Commissioners Present:
Chair:
Vice Chair:
Commissioner:
Commissioner:
Commissioner:
Commissioner:
Commissioner:
Susan A. Keams
Dennis Lowe
I. Bud Alne
Elizabeth Gibbons (arrived 7:37)
Brad Jones
Mel Lindstrom
Jane Meyer-Kennedy
Commissioners Absent:
None
Staff Present:
Community
Development Director:
Associate Planner:
Planner I:
Planning Assistant:
City Attorney:
Reporting Secretary:
Steve Piasecki
Tim J. Haley
Barbara Schoetz Ryan
Efrem Joelson
William Seligmann
Corinne A. Shinn
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion: On motion of Commissioner Meyer-Kennedy, seconded by
Commissioner Alne, the Planning Commission minutes of July 8,
1997, were approved. (5-0-0-2; Commissioners Lindstrom and
Lowe abstained as they were not in attendance at the July 8, 1997,
meeting.)
Planning Commission Minutes of July 22, 1997 Page 2
COMMUNICATIONS.
There were no communication items.
AGENDA MODIFICATIONS OR POSTPONEMENTS
There were no agenda modifications or postponements.
ORAL REQUESTS
There were no oral requests.
PUBLIC HEARING
Chairwoman Keams read Agenda Item No. 1 into the record.
R 97-01 (PD 90-06)/
M 96-12 (TS 94-01)
Borns, T.
Continued Public Hearing to consider the application of Mr.
Ted Borns for approval of a Reinstatement (R 97-01) of a
previously-approved Planned Development Permit (PD 90-06)
and approval of a Modification (M 96-12) to a previously-
approved Tentative Subdivision Map (TS 94-01) to allow a
five-unit townhome project on property located at 80 Dot
Avenue in a PD (Planned Development) Zoning District. A
Negative Declaration was previously granted for this project.
Tentative City Council Date: September 2, 1997. (Continued
from the Planning Commission meeting of July 8, 1997.)
Mr. Tim J. Haley, Associate Planner, presented the staff report as follows:
· Applicant is seeking the Reinstatement of a Planned Development Permit which was
originally approved in 1990 and a Tentative Map originally approved in 1994.
· An extension of this project was approved, but expired in March 1997.
· The project site is located on the east side of Dot Avenue, south of Campbell Avenue.
· The General Plan designation is medium density residential which allows 14-20 units per
gross acre.
· The development is proposed at 13.8 units per acre.
· Applicant is also seeking the modification of the Tentative Map allowing the deletion of
the common lot. Access would be handled through the use of easements and CC&Rs.
· There have been no General Plan nor development policy changes enacted that impact this
project since its original approval.
· Staff recommends that the Commission forward two resolutions to Council, recommending
the Reinstatement of the Planned Development Permit and the Modification to the
Tentative Subdivision Map.
Commissioner Gibbons asked how many lots there would be?
Planning Commission Minutes of July 22, 1997 Page 3
Mr. Tim J. Haley answered currently there are six lots, one serving as a common access.
However, the applicant is requesting elimination of the common access lot.
Commissioner Alne mentioned that there are two units marked D-2 on the plans.
Mr. Tim J. Haley answered that them are four unit styles and five units. Style D-2 will be built
for two of the units.
Commissioner Meyer-Kennedy presented the Site and Architectural Review Committee report
as follows:
· SARC is supportive of this project.
Chairwoman Keams opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 1.
There were no parties present who wished to address Agenda Item No. 1.
Chairwoman Keams closed the Public Heating for Agenda Item No. 1.
Motion:
Upon motion of Commissioner Meyer-Kennedy seconded by
Commissioner Lindstrom, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution
No. 3103 recommending approval of the Reinstatement (R 97-01) of a
previously-approved Planned Development Permit (PD 90-06) and
Resolution No. 3104 recommending approval of the Reinstatement and a
Modification (M 96-12) to a previously-approved Tentative Subdivision
Map (TS 94-01) to allow a five-unit townhome project on property located
at 80 Dot Avenue, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Alne, Gibbons, Jones, Kearns, Lindstrom, Lowe, Meyer-
Kennedy
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Chairwoman Keams read Agenda Item No. 2 into the record:
2. S 97-14
Kealoha, J.
Public Hearing to consider the application of Ms. Joyce
Kealoha for a Site and Architectural Approval (S 97-14) to
allow the construction of a new single-family residence on
property located at 1849 Pollard Road in a PD (Planned
Development-Low to Medium Density Residential) Zoning
District. This project is Categorically Exempt. Tentative City
Council Date: September 2, 1997.
Planning Commission Minutes of July 22, 1997 Page 4
Ms. Barbara Schoetz Ryan, Planner I, presented the staff report as follows:
· The subject property is in a Planned Development Zone, on the north side
of Pollard,
southwest of Highway 85.
· Currently on site are a high voltage PG&E tower, a 1,200 square foot single-story house
and a two-story granny unit.
· Applicant is seeking to replace the existing single-story house with a new structure.
· Three trees will need to be removed but four trees will be planted.
· The proposed use is consistent with the Zoning and General Plan Designations and with
the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan.
· SARC recommends approval but sought landscaping on the chain link fence. However,
this chain link fence is not in Campbell's jurisdiction but rather Los Gatos'.
· This project is exempt from CEQA.
· Staff recommends that the Commission forward this project to Council with a
recommendation of approval.
Commissioner Meyer-Kennedy presented the Site and Architectural Review Committee report
as follows:
· SARC had wanted landscaping along the chain link fence.
· SARC has learned that CalTrans will install the desired landscaping, therefore, SARC
recommends approval of the project as submitted.
Chairwoman Keams opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 2.
There were no parties interested in addressing Agenda Item No. 2.
Chairwoman Keams closed the Public Heating for Agenda Item No. 2.
Commissioner Lowe asked about the granny unit on site.
Commissioner Gibbons clarified that there is a granny unit on site which will remain.
Motion:
Upon motion of Commissioner Gibbons seconded by Lowe, the Planning
Commission adopted Resolution No. 3105 recommending approval of a
Site and Architectural Application (S 97-14) to allow the construction of a
new single family residence on property located at 1849 Pollard Road, by
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Alne Gibbons, Jones, Kearns, Lindstrom, Lowe, Meyer-
Kennedy
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Planning Commission Minutes of July 22, 1997 Page 5
Chairwoman Keams read Agenda Item No. 3 into the record:
3. R 97-05
garcone, M.
Public Heating to consider the application of Mr. Michael
Zarcone for approval of a Reinstatement (R 97-05) of a
previously approved Conditional Use Permit to establish a
pediatric hospital on property located at 3777 $. Bascom
Avenue in an R-3-S (High Density Residential) Zoning
District. This project is Categorically Exempt. Planning
Commission decision final, unless appealed in writing to the
City Clerk within 10 days.
Ms. Barbara Ryan, Planner I, presented the staff report as follows:
· Applicant is seeking the reinstatement of the Conditional Use Permit to allow a hospital
use.
· Site is on the west side of Bascom Avenue, near White Oaks Road.
· Surrounding uses include high density residential to the north; offices to the south; single
family residential to the west (behind this project); and commercial uses to the east (across
Bascom Avenue).
· The site has been vacant for more than a year which is why the Use Permit needs to be
Reinstated.
· Hospitals are permitted within any zoning district with a Conditional Use Permit.
· Staff recommends approval with the condition that the landscaping be rejuvenated.
· SARC recommends approval.
· No CEQA review is required for this project.
Commissioner Lowe asked about the use of ambulances.
Ms. Barbara Ryan advised that the patients at this facility are long-term hospital patients who
have been under medical supervision for a period of time.
Commissioner Meyer-Kennedy presented the Site and Architectural Review Committee report
as follows:
· SARC recommends approval.
Chairwoman Keams opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 3.
Ms. Nancy Mee, 109 Bascom Court:
· Expressed concerns about ambulance useage, use of sirens and whether a quiet zone could
be established where sirens could be shut off as the ambulance approaches this site?
· Asked what hours of operation would be, shift changes, visiting hours, etc.
Commissioner Lowe asked about the original use of this building.
Planning Commission Minutes of July 22, 1997 Page 6
Ms. Barbara Ryan replied that it served as a long-term, post operative hospital.
Chairwoman Keams asked for clarification about ambulances and anticipated traffic.
Ms. Barbara Ryan replied that the applicant can best answer these types of questions. She
explained that this is a long-term care facility. There are not a lot of visitors. In fact the
facility plans to work with local seniors to establish a network of visitors for patients that
receive no visitors at all.
Mr. Michael Zarcone, Applicant:
· Advised that the patients coming to his facility are post injury or children bom with birth
defects. Most children are transfered from neo-natal intensive care units from local
hospitals.
· The majority of the children have no functional family support and have minimal visits.
· The goal of the program is to get the children to a level where they can go into foster care.
· Ambulances will deliver the young patients during the day.
· No sirens will be needed.
· There is no emergency room so there is no reason for ambulances utilizing sirens to deliver
patients.
· Staff levels are one nurse for every four to five children. This will result in about eight to
nine staff vehicles. The evening shift will end at 10:30 or 11 p.m.
Commissioner Gibbons suggested that in the event of an emergency, an ambulance might be
needed.
Mr. Michael Zarcone said that it was possible but not likely nor often.
Ms. Nancy Mee, 109 Bascom Court:
· Stated that the previous occupants had their parking lot light on a timer.
· Right now lighting comes on at 11 p.m. and is very bright and the timer is not being used.
· Asked that the new tenants reutilize the timer.
Commissioner Lindstrom stated that this is a fair request and suggested that Ms. Mee work
with the applicant.
Chairwoman Keams closed the Public Heating for Agenda Item No. 3.
Planning Commission Minutes of July 22, 1997 Page 7
Motion:
Upon motion of Commissioner Lowe seconded by Commissioner Meyer-
Kennedy, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 3106
approving the Reinstatement (R 97-05) of a previously-approved
Conditional Use Permit to establish a pediatric hospital on property
located at 3777 S. Bascom Avenue, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Alne, Gibbons, Jones, Kearns, Lindstrom, Lowe, Meyer-
Kennedy
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Chairwoman Kearns read Agenda Item No. 4 into the record:
4. S 97-15
Carlson
Public Hearing to consider the application of Jeff and Deanne
Carlson for a Site and Architectural Approval (S 97-15) to
allow a single-family residence on property located at 1167
Steinway Avenue in an R-l-10 (Single Family Residential)
Zoning District. This project is Categorically Exempt.
Planning Commission decision final, unless appealed in writing
to the City Clerk within 10 days.
Mr. Tim J. Haley, Associate Planner, presented the staff report as follows:
· Applicant is seeking to construct a new single-family residence at 1167 Steinway Avenue.
· The project site is located west of Peggy Avenue and is in the San Tomas Area
Neighborhood.
· Lot is .45 acres.
· Zoning is R- 1-10.
· Applicant is proposing to remove two small single-family residences and build a new
single family residence on the property.
· Proposed residence includes 4,700 square feet with a 620 square foot, three-car garage.
· This represents 15% coverage.
· Landscaping represents 75%.
· FAR is .24.
· In addition to the three-car garage, space for three cars will be available in front of the
garage.
· The General Plan calls for 3.5 units per acre.
· This project meets all requirements for the R-l-10 Zoning District and the San Tomas Area
Neighborhood Plan.
· Staff had concerns over the original submittal due to the prominent garage and two-story
entranceway. Since that time, the applicant has revised his plans to address staff's
concerns.
Planning Commission Minutes of July 22, 1997 Page 8
· There are substantial setbacks for this project, 46 feet in the front; 140 feet in the rear, and
12 and 13 feet on each side.
· Staff recommends that the driveway be tapered, narrowing as it nears the street.
· Staff recommends approval.
Commissioner Lindstrom asked about the landscaping and plans to install 10 trees.
Mr. Tim J. Haley advised that the project site will be 75% landscaping. The proposed house is
larger than those in the neighborhood. The addition of 10 trees is consistent with the San
Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan. One tree on site is diseased and will be removed.
Commissioner Lindstrom sought clarification that this landscaping exceeds requirements.
Mr. Tim J. Haley advised that Commissioner Lindstrom was correct.
Commissioner Alne asked about the legality of the lot as mentioned in Condition of Approval
No. 6.
Mr. Tim J. Haley advised that the lot was created by a record of survey under County
jurisdiction in the 1960's. The applicant intends to develop the land as one lot.
Commissioner Alne asked whether the applicant would be refunded $10,000 in Park Fees
since one home is being removed? Asked whether the applicant would have to pay a Park Fee
in the event that he built a granny unit in the future on this property?
Mr. Tim J. Haley advised that there is a provision for an exemption of Park Fees for two years
upon removal of the structure if it can be proven that the structures were legally created.
Commissioner Alne asked how this would be done?
City Attorney William Seligrnann answered that the Ordinance allows for an exemption within
two years of the structure's demolition.
Commissioner Lowe questioned the driveway requirement and whether the applicant
supported the amendment.
Mr. Tim J. Haley advised that as proposed the driveway to the street is full width for three
cars. Staff is recommending a tapered driveway so that at the street it would be 16 feet wide
which is a standard driveway width. The applicant received a copy of the staff report outlining
this requirement to reduce the width of the driveway and did not oppose the recommendation.
Planning Commission Minutes of July 22, 1997 Page 9
Commissioner Meyer-Kennedy presented the Site and Architectural Review Committee report
as follows:
· With four to five provisions which have been added to the staff report regarding the
driveway width, trellis feature, etc., SARC recommends approval.
Chairwoman Keams opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 4.
Mr. Dennis Post, 1185 Steinway Avenue:
· Stated that he has one concern, a water problem.
· There is no drainage from Peggy Avenue to Steinway.
· Wants to make sure that grading of this project does not leave water on site.
Commissioner Lindstrom asked how this concern is addressed in this process?
Mr. Steve Piasecki advised that Condition of Approval No. 5 requires a Grading and Drainage
Plan for the site. Stated that staff will make this concern known to the Public Works
Department.
Commissioner Alne asked whether there were any collection points on site? Stated that water
will drain to the low point.
Mr. Steve Piasecki advised that staff will investigate whether a drain or grading will be
necessary. Staff will not allow this development to aggravate any existing problem.
Commissioner Lindstrom advised Mr. Post that his concerns will become a matter of public
record and be a part of the minutes of this meeting.
Mr. Steve Piasecki advised Mr. Post that he might prepare a letter outlining his concerns to the
City Engineer, stating the impacts.
Mr. Dennis Post advised that in the past, the Public Works Department has come out to his
site. He was not allowed to install a French drain. A cul-de-sac with drain was originally
planned for this area but was never built.
Commissioner Alne stated that installation of a drain is costly.
Commissioner Gibbons wondered if the Conditions of Approval were met and project built
according to plan for Mr. Post's home, since Mr. Post is experiencing the water problem?
Mr. Leonard Manjemelli, Applicant's Representative:
· Stated that he is present to answer any questions.
· Said that they are building the new house 140 feet from the rear property line.
grade where the house will be constructed will be raised.
Only the
Planning Commission Minutes of July 22, 1997 Page 10
Commissioner Alne stated that the lot floods now and will flood in the future.
Mr. Steve Piasecki suggested that the Commission defer this matter to the Engineers to study.
Staffwill look at the problem.
Chairwoman Keams closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No. 4.
Motion:
Upon motion of Commissioner Meyer-Kennedy seconded by
Commissioner Lowe, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No.
3107 granting a Site and Architectural Approval (S 97-15) to allow a
single-family residence on property located at 1167 Steinway Avenue by
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Alne Gibbons,
Kennedy
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Jones, Kearns, Lindstrom, Lowe, Meyer-
Chairwoman Keams read Agenda Item No. 5 into the record:
5. M 97-10
Denues, G.
Hearing to consider the application of Mr. Guy Denues for
approval of a Modification (M 97-10) to the side yard setback
requirement to allow a second-story addition to a single family
residence on property located at 1641 Manton Court in an R-
1-6 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District. This project is
Categorically Exempt. Planning Commission decision final
unless appealed in writing to the City Clerk within 10 days.
Mr. Efrem Joelson, Planning Assistant, presented the staff report as follows:
· Applicant is seeking a Modification to the sideyard setback for 1641 Manton Court to
allow a second story addition.
· Zoning for the site is R-l-6 and the General Plan Designation is Low Density Residential.
· Project is located within the San Tomas Area.
· The project is surrounded by single family residences.
· All building standards are met with the exception of the east side sideyard setback. While
a nine-foot sideyard setback is required, the proposal is for a 6 foot sideyard setback.
· The Planning Commission is authorized to allow a Modification to the setback
requirement.
· Staff has received letters from all adjacent neighbors, none of whom expressed any
objection to this reduced setback.
· A second story residence is already located on this street.
Planning Commission Minutes of July 22, 1997 Page
Commissioner Meyer-Kennedy presented the Site and Architectural Review Committee report
as follows:
· SARC recommends approval.
Chairwoman Keams asked if there was anyone present wishing to address Agenda Item No. 5.
There was no one present who wished to address Agenda Item No. 5
Motion:
Upon motion of Commissioner Lindstrom, seconded by Commissioner
Meyer-Kennedy, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 3108
granting a Modification (M 97-10) to the side yard setback requirement to
allow a second-story addition to a single family residence on property
located at 1641 Manton Court, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Alne Gibbons, Jones, Kearns, Lindstrom, Lowe, Meyer-
Kennedy
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Chairwoman Keams read Agenda Item No. 6 into the record:
6. SA 97-28
Banducci Associates
Hearing to consider the application of Banducci Associates
Architects, on behalf Mitsui Kensetsu Development, for
approval of a Sign Program for an office complex located on
property at 900 E. Hamilton Avenue in a PD (Planned
Development) Zoning District. This project is Categorically
Exempt. Planning Commission decision final unless appealed
in writing to the City Clerk within 10 days.
Ms. Barbara Schoetz Ryan, Planner I, presented the staff report as follows:
· Applicant is seeking approval of a sign program for a six-story office complex located on
the southeast comer of Hamilton and Creekside.
· Apple Computer is leaving one of the buildings but will remain in the second building for
several more years contrary to what was mentioned in the staff report.
· The proposed program includes two multi-tenant signs, a monument sign at each entry on
Creekside.
· Included in the proposed Sign Program are directional signs which exceed the 6 square feet
which is exempt from review under the Sign Ordinance. The applicant is proposing 11
square foot directional signs.
Planning Commission Minutes of July 22, 1997 Page 12
· Monument signs will have a stucco base in a mid-range color that is neither bright nor
neutral.
· Staff finds the proposal acceptable due to the size of the complex and the increase in the
number of tenants, with the departure of a large tenant, smaller tenants will occupy this
space.
· The signage is justified and in proportion with the size of the buildings and frontage.
· Total signage in the program is 261 (135 square feet in directional signage and 126 square
feet in tenant identification signage).
· Under the Sign Ordinance, 80 square feet would be allowed.
· More than one monument sign is wan'anted due to the size of the buildings.
· The proposed signage is in harmony with the architecture of the buildings and SARC has
recommended approval of the proposed sign program.
· This project is exempt from CEQA review.
Commissioner Alne asked if the sign program took into account any use of logos.
Ms. Barbara Ryan indicated that one Apple logo will be replaced.
Commissioner Alne asked if the applicants will come back in the future for additional square
footage?
Ms. Barbara Ryan stated that logos would be permitted, if they fit within the allowable square
footage.
Commissioner Gibbons sought to clarify that there are two buildings in this project, logo signs
are acceptable and the proposal is for black letter along the top of the building. If any other
color is proposed, the sign would come back to the Commission?
Ms. Barbara Ryan replied that was correct.
Commissioner Alne joked that if placed horizontally, the Rasputin sign could fit. Asked
whether lettering signs could be installed without any further action.
Ms. Barbara Ryan replied that a sign permit would be required as well as building permits.
Mr. Steve Piasecki suggested that staff be given the authority to meet the program. Any
proposed logos could come to the Commission.
Commissioner Gibbons suggested that anything but lettering come back to the Commission.
City Attorney William Seligmann warned that the Commission cannot pick the message of a
sign. Only objective features can be evaluated such as size and color.
Planning Commission Minutes of July 22, 1997 Page 13
Commissioner Gibbons suggested that a Condition of Approval be added that states that any
variations from the approved program require review of the Planning Director and the
Planning Commission if the Director feels that it is necessary.
Commissioner Alne stated that the landlord wants to tell tenants what signage can be expected,
with general limitations. He stated that he will not support as the City stands to lose control
over one of the most prominent locations in the City.
Motion:
Upon motion of Commissioner Lindstrom seconded by Commissioner
Gibbons, the Planning Commission approved a Sign Program for the office
buildings located at 900 E. Hamilton Avenue with the added Condition
that any variation from the black lettering approved under this Sign
Program, be it logos or use of other colors in the lettering, will require
further review and approval by the Community Development Director
and/or the Planning Commission, should the Director feel it is necessary,
by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Gibbons, Jones, Kearns, Lindstrom, Lowe, Meyer-Kennedy
NOES: Alne
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Chairwoman Keams read Agenda Item No. 7 into the record:
SA 97-26
Cai Neon Signs
Hearing to consider the application of Cal Neon Signs for
approval of a Sign Program for a new commercial building
located at 790 E.Campbell Avenue in a PD (Planned
Development/Commercial) Zoning District. This project is
Categorically Exempt. Planning Commission decision final
unless appealed in writing to the City Clerk within 10 days.
Mr. Tim J. Haley, Associate Planner, presented the staff report as follows:
· Applicant is proposing a Sign Program for a new retail building
currently under
construction at 790 E. Campbell Avenue.
· Included in the proposed signage is a 16 square foot, 6 foot high freestanding sign and
three wall signs.
· The Sign Ordinance allows for one square foot of signage for each linear square foot of
frontage. The options are for two wall or one wall and one freestanding sign.
· The proposal is for signs on all four elevations. The square footage of signs is consistent
with the Sign Ordinance but the proposed number of signs is not which is why this
application is before the Commission.
· The proposed style is individual letter style on a raceway.
Planning Commission Minutes of July 22, 1997 Page 14
Commissioner Gibbons asked for clarification on the amount of signage allowed under the
Sign Ordinance.
Mr. Tim J. Haley advised that as this building fronts on two streets they are allowed two wall
signs but no freestanding sign.
Commissioner Gibbons asked whether the applicants were asking for one freestanding and one
wall sign for each frontage?
Mr. Tim J. Haley replied that their request depends upon how the building is leased out.
Commissioner Gibbons stated that the proposed sign program is asking for one sign per leased
frontage with lettering not to exceed 24 inches. Stated that the Commission "has no idea what
we're approving."
Mr. Tim J. Haley clarified that the Sign Program calls for 24 inch lettering and logo heights;
square footage tied to linear frontage, two wall signs, one at Campbell and Union and the other
in the parking area.
Commissioner Alne stated that the Sign Ordinance spells out what is allowed. This is gutting
the Sign Ordinance. Stated that he will not support. Presentation of sound evidence is needed
to support this request before he will support it.
Commissioner Meyer-Kennedy said that the request is for two wall signs and one wall sign in
the interior, facing the parking area.
Mr. Tim J. Haley advised that this is staff recommendation which deviates from the Sign
Ordinance. One 16 square foot freestanding sign and one wall sign facing the parking area.
All the rest could be approved at staff level consistent with the Sign Ordinance.
Commissioner Lindstrom clarified that staff finds the use of freestanding and wall signs
excessive and is recommending no wall signs on the southem elevation and a maximum of two
outer wall signs and one interior wall sign (facing parking area).
Mr. Tim J. Haley advised that staff's recommendation requires the approval of a Sign
Program.
Commissioner Lindstrom asked if staff approved the applicant's original request.
Mr. Tim J. Haley advised that staff reduced their request but the request still exceeds the Sign
Ordinance. Whereas the Planning staff handles about 75 sign applications each year, the
Commission sees only about 10 requests that exceed signage allowed under the Ordinance.
Planning Commission Minutes of July 22, 1997 Page 15
Commissioner Lowe questioned whether this Sign Program would restrict the developer and/or
future tenants and whether the Commission has set a precedent with the previous Sign
Program approval (900 E. Hamilton)?
City Attomey William Seligmann reminded the Commission that its decisions are based upon
factual considerations such as locations, size and heights of signs.
Mr. Steve Piasecki advised that the Commission could ask the applicant to make their case;
send back to staff for more information or if the proposal is too vague, deny the application
whereas the applicant has the option to appeal.
Commissioner Lowe stated that if sign requests meet regulations, staff can approve. If not, the
Commission should review.
Mr. Tim J. Haley advised that the applicant is interested in providing their prospective tenants
with the criteria for the signage they can install at this site.
Commissioner Alne suggested that the Commission wait and see specifically what signage is
wanted for the specific tenants leasing this space.
Mr. Dominick Jacaloni, Applicant's Representative:
· With a Sign Program the tenant knows what signage they will get.
· This saves time
· They will make their signage fit the adopted criteria.
· A sign program creates a more uniform sign area on the building.
Commissioner Alne suggested that the applicant is not asking approval for a Sign Program but
rather to rewrite the Sign Ordinance. Why not hand a copy of the Sign Ordinance to the
tenants?
Commissioner Gibbons agreed that she preferred not to handle this request in this basis.
Mr. Dominick Jacaloni stated that if the sign fits the Ordinance, it is approved by Planning
staff. If it does not, it comes to the Commission.
Motion:
Upon motion of Commissioner Alne, seconded by Commissioner Lowe, the
Planning Commission voted to deny a Sign Program (SA 97-26) for the
new commercial building located at 790 E. Campbell Avenue by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Alne, Gibbons, Jones, Lindstrom, Lowe,
NOES: Kearns, Meyer-Kennedy
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
Planning Commission Minutes of July 22, 1997 Page 16
Mr. Steve Piasecki advised the applicant that this denial can be appealed in writing to the City
Clerk within 10 days.
REPORT OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
The written report of Mr. Steve Piasecki, Community Development Director, was accepted as
presented with the following additions:
· The City has sent out an RFP for cablecasting equipment. Taping of meetings may start in
September.
· Council approved a contract for contract services for General Plan Updates.
· Council upheld the Planning Commission decision regarding 1689 Walters Avenue.
· Advised that Commissioner Alne cannot make the next SARC meeting (scheduled for July
23, 1997). (Commissioner Lindstrom agreed to attend.)
ADJOURNMENT
The Planning Commission meeting
meeting of August 12, 1997, in the
Campbell, California.
SUBMITTED BY:
APPROVED BY:
ATTEST:
adjourned at 9:13 p.m. to the Planning Commission
Council Chambers, City Hall, 70 North First Street,
Corinne A. Shinn, Recording Secretary