Hamilton Ave. (1972)
. - ...0
Southem Pacific:
Transportation Company
W. M. JON"'.
surERINTE,IO',NT
R. V. CUR,¡ £R
',ssT SU'ERINTEN()ENT-OAKLAND
V. fl. RUSSELL
ASS" S'JPERI"TE"DENT-OAKLAND
J V' HOLl.OWAY
TL,RM'NAL SUfERINTENDENT-OAKLAND
1707 Wood Street. Oakland, California 94607 . 832-2121
December 6, 1972
IN RKPLY PLKAn RUKR TO
925165/32
J. F. BAYS
TEHMINAC W:>ERINTENDENT-U.N FRANCI8CO
M. J. KARLOVIC
DIVISION ENGINEER-OAKLAND
Sanford Getreu,
Director of Planning
Department of City Planning
City Hall
City of San Jose
801 North First Street
San Jose, Colifornia 95110
Attn:
Mr. Gary J. Schoennauer, Planner III
Subject:
Access Road, Bascom Avenue, North of Los Gatos Cr~ek
Gentlemen:
Reference is made to your letters of November 15, 1972, con-
cerning the hearing on January 9, 1973, for items No. PDC 72-11-159
and PDC 72-11-160.
The Southern Pacific Transportation Company must oppose appli-
cations PDC 72-11-159 and PDC 72-11-160, because of the proposed
public road proposed to be constructed over our property in the
vicinity of Bascom Avenue Crossing, PUC #L-49.7. This proposed
crossing has been opposed by the railroad vigorously. At the
time that an on-sight meeting was held betw~en the engineers of
previous developers for the property, the proposal was not looked
on with a great deal of enthusiasm by the City of San Jose Traffic
Engineers, the County of Santa Clara Traff.lc Engineers, the Director
of Public Works for the City of Campbell, nor by the California Public
utilities staff members. Our objection to the proposed crossing re-
mains the same as it was in the past, that is, vehicles stacked be-
tween the gates ßoverning the southbound lanes on Bascom Avenue
would h£ve no place to go because of the actual locations on the
gates on the proposed crossings.
"iould appreciate your calling to the attention of the developers
of bottl of these parcels that neither San Jose nor the City of
Compbell have jurisdiction over grade crossings. This matter lies
exclusively in the hands of the California Public utilities Commission.
Would recommend that the developers resubmit their plans for
their develonments without the lands of the Southern Pacific Trans-
portation Company being involved, or being implied to be involved.
Yours truly,
W. M. JONES - J. G. S.
.,.
-
I
..
November 24,1972
04-8Cl-17
04216 - 306331
Mr. San1'ord Getreu
Director or Planning
City 01' Ban Jose
Bo1 North First Street
San Jos., CA 95110
Attention Gary J. Schoennauer
Gentlemen:
We have reviewed the General Development Plan map (PDC-72-ll-l59)
for property located east of Route 17 and north of Hamilton Avenue.
This map was tranall1tted with your letter of November 15, 1972.
Our current planning for future expanslon of Route 17 requires an
adjustment to the northbound on-ramp. '1'h1s modification will require
a narrow sll ver take from the proposed development. This requIrement,
shown graphically in red on attached print encroaches slightly into
the open space area of the development.
It appears that therpropoaed access locat1on to Hamilton Avenue will
create additional operational problema on this heavily travelled
local arterial. We urge that the traffic access be reatricted to
right-turn movementa by a medlan restr1ction on Hamilton Avenue.
One feature o~ the plan that appeals to U8 1s the use of an open
apace area between the freeway and the residential dwellings. We
certainly encourage the use of this open apace concept in all new
developments to minimize noise problems associated with freeway
operations.
Very truly yours,
By c"";'~.
':1\11 " ,,;
, INtTt!\l
TO & DATE
WG~ ___~~LðØ-, ..
6MH ,-p" .."
FTL -"'--'- --
'1'. R . LAMMERS
District Engineer
R. E. BAX'1'IR
DistrIct DesI¡n Engineer
Attach.
._-
.__"h-----""-
-----..--
....-' ..-'
fiLE ~-¡i- \ -----
----------------------
-- --------
---------_._---,---
)
- ---- -------------'"
\
'~---- -
f'
-iff
~¡ (I,,'(
-,
----;-~-- ~ ..
7<,:C:';: : 11~~i ~
.-. , ... ,-,"""!I"
, "-Y"f !,- "'".~. " , ',,~:"',~~:':::"::II /Ø
':~"~-~.--,~7,1, r,:" - <,,;' i.<: .~_I
--'- ,'I .-" ,~"::;::l 1
.. '-' ,-..' - -"~ ,-,-~~\---~'~
,,- --, --,-- ~ "'7 ! ,~~, < I
""".,,',':0:,"':, '\,'~i--'--::'-"""','1
':--:- :, ;,~~~-4 ,~
: 'j " --. ,I~;- ,0 ,
¡jì ) : ¡ : I,,~ "
I I' I 'J' 'I, ' ,~ J,"
"""'J"" '/~ '.-J
""",',,' 'J '....~'_h'-
,~,'~_i ' -~--:~-~_o--- ",'~,----; _:- -1--:-- -~,;--;-~:,~:-~ ~
/ ¡-T----r ¡ , :,' I r" ¡- ;"l- -1' ! -' I ~"l '"
f' ""'""""'',:,"::'O" ","':'!",",41,'-"!'<",~ ,¡
;':: 1',1 ~ 'ì: ¡"',')'i' ',-~~--:i--....
Co -'.,--, '--.. , I, 1-'¡ I' ~
:r. /; --' T,-C,: -,,; :,,; ,,¡ /~¡ ':,:' :T;',',T,-';TcoT, -'¡"';\'~I~
~ ,.","i,¡'l': -""'¡.:;'-"l""j":'1 i ~_,_,1/-'~:~~
\ ~¡ -:;," ~'-=--;"\~:;~-'T->1u~r'O!ï~~~~,-~-~=:':',~~-~-~~~::J,~! ~7
\ 1 "y' \'-",',':,J I í L_","I""J Iq,"I,t~
~,\ ~'~<"./, \_"~:'j:?',\-~¡O", ,R'.';},-¡tI,tI;80',i9CY',o~';-,:",',l,:-'~l,"¡~---8j.
\ \, 'ì !¡- "";"--';\----[1- ,;,;-,_LJ__~J ",-,jI--~¡--""i¡' ; 0 ,L'
1\ '{It" t'::, ""'! I'! T",'",' ",-141
i, \ \\, -;-,.",,'," ~-";,,:.',,I, ~"'~:,-" :,,:"¡,",:'; ~, ",' . y,',,!"'98. ";7:,~',"~¡",_:"~"LL"L--~ -..
1. \ ...~';:" i, ',' ! 1"""" C'\, -","'--- t"'!...':'_,! .1,-",", ,~'
" ~\ ,,' '" ' r -- _\',' "---- - J-_,f ..-L-,-..J_L.~- ,~...-¡~
\1 '2..\\ 11",:, ",' r-/ -:--~¡, i" :""-'1-'-' -rl-"'1--¡Î--I'~ f~
1 C? " T:., "t., '!.,.,:r','\\"'!,I..:,.~,-,,: ~_I,\',,'¡,,',""',';,I,:",I,IJ"¡';e¡~,~1 '
\ \\ ! .. 1- :.. 1 ,'Y'", :-'; 'J; jé4 _L .1-- :o~ - -~' "I g ~
I \ ~~,.. \,!J;-'J' ;..';,i'i"';,',..""",:~L,~r")'22),'!li ':'JJ¡'~JY~'~
\ '.-": t" 1 ""'¡'¡".J -- ~~
-- . n', -' "r- .'l \ ~ \\ A:t::::;;<' :_~ ~-;~:~\', (¡'-,:;=-::::.:,:,- <-~:-r::i:crl- -- ,_:~
,..-""" \ "',"-' ,,'~ \1'_"'1/,"',',\1,1","1,"3,/"'",,"',.,',1,,4'; I,"-'!~", 1",1.;
;..t""""! .",~" ~~ ,'-".':,':.' "¡'i"'!:: "I""~~""";" '-
~,:-,,-- "'.,- \'" ;" 't-, , ,_,0 ¡ I I'.,~' I,'
2t:'C;~REEr" '\ '::-'"I'J ~ 1!"4:',: : :' 'I "¡-'::"';;'.!¡~"-'."--i.'~~~_:_~L..-
\ ,'" ' \ l j' , 3 ,""" ", "~~~,~,,-,, ,,-...;:";;
PRIVATE \ \ ,;', l -1, ",":!'-," '_! .~, "
I' IJ' -'- - ,~_..: \ '. ~'?, L-c-._~ .. :, --' ..-- --,-' ..~-- ~" ,i, 1 ~ t
>-', ~.~~;..;: -r-- I' Þ"",",,1 ,1 \ \ "\ \, ',' ;-~';- ,-",--,-,-"--,-'~-' " ,': ¡ f "t"L"',"!,'.':
'f"",,'l' , I, ..' 'l í'",' ,\':.. '" ,-----I
,-L":':":'" I. ~' I :'..~,,!r";"", ;'~;rTJ'--
~:-- ---L,-~-..,,' , \ .""y,,': ,-:-ì':-"\!: 1':1 f.JIT1\ ' T
3s:,t":;f£T - - \. ,c"" Y"D~\I,\\.-,\\:\:\r.\\\.\-\1l11 i'l"fu'f'\'l
" ;;'-- --:.-uú ::.í \ ~\':"'Dê.< \~'T,::"':;:;'~'Tìx';:./ ¡ hrTì
~~, .;~';" ',~ \. \,,'¡',¡i'-:) \~I¿\'1~.D:Iy.tD ì lY"'!/i¥JjfjJ
~~~:::::;' \ :,~ ~::,..t,'~,;\U\". r'~,\'IJ,'~.'."f'Ì'.\,'Y:.\"i'TI,,:\;,1~-\\,¡~;:,1,I;)E!;~~~.~,ç,~
STREET SECTIONS _: '.,,--',,\ t_:~_:~r4 J:U_'-', ':fr,ll~Ll1'¡1'\\ \\1 nu, \\. "', Ii. -I.
TYPICAL ¡ \ em'or (i\Mf8m \ ~- 00 mu~~' IJ \ r I '.
'\ \ \, " ';; ..rc .~'~\~\\\ j ~ ;
: \\~""""" ~ C~KJI al :Im\\\ j¡c~~~:..1r.~/\\,}
I ' "" lA- 1\ I -A . ,L
\ \ ~ "- \ \ I, \ ",
, \..;.... ---,-,--------- \ I~I
\ I "- ¿'/$?I" ",rq,'" 1 /
. .-- . -_L-..L_---. h'l .:-YN '~'JoI,,~ II*Z
", I
y-----..,---- --- -,
_. ,-----_.~-_. ,'--."'.-------' --.
"'-----'-------" '., ".'
"I
'\
;\
.i
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
'.
\
\
\
\
I
\
\
\
("-- ~.
,
: j,~:';
[ . ~ ,
\
\
". "-------"----',
."
, ..
, .
ì
\
\
h-
.-
I ..-
. '
':,-
\
\
",
"
"
. 4"
.' !.;
.
¡
~
... "
.
...
j
j
J
I
j
j
i
j
J
t
,
1
1
1
Î
f
, ,
- -.----- --.-
- - -- -- -....
,,__--0 ------------
----------------
1IA IJïLtON--~,- --~7jV£N~
\ ~ / / ' ,',
\ \ / /- // (,
V~Th boy M~
ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS 2056 EL CAMINO REAL, SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA 95051 (408) 247-7410
November 29, 1972
/ / -Z. é) -7 Z C. ~~"Cq
City of Campbell
Engineering Department
161 Grant Street
Campbell, California
Attention:
Mr." Cruz s. Gomez
Gentlemen:
Transmitted herewith are thirty (30) copies of
our tentative parcel map for your review and approval.
Also included is our check for $25 for the filing fee.
We respectfully request that this matter be placed on
the agenda for your first meeting in January.
The purpose of the tentative parcel map is for the
conveyance of real property to allow for future planned
developments in Parcels 2 and 3, and a commercial develop-
ment in Parcell.
If there are any questions, or you need any information
pertaining to the enclosed tentative parcel map, please
contact me.
Very truly yours,
VTN - Bay Area
~ ß""""S:::t; J~ \ ç ,
James o. Webb, Jr.
Licensed Land Surveyor
JOW/cab
Ene.
cc:
City of San Jose
.co,
<-
'" "
November 29,1972
City of San Jose
Planning Commission
SOl North First Street
San Jose, California
Attention:
Mr. Noel Ameele
Gentlemen:
Transmitted herewith are ten blueline prints and
one sepia of a tentative parcel map for your review
and approval. Also enclosed is our check in the amount
of $103. for the filing fee. We respectfully request
that the matter be placed on the agenda for your
meeting of January 9, 1973.
The purpose of the tentative parcel map is for
the convcy~nco of real property to allow for future
planned developments.
Attention should be drawn to the following items:
1.
The northeast portion of Parcel 3 is subject
to inundation.
2.
All buildings shown will be removed during
construction of the planned development.
Sewage disposal and storm drainage will be
designed at the time of the design of the
planned development.
3.
't
City of San Jose
-2-
,..
November 29,1972
.
4.
An Environmental Impact Report has been
submitted to the City of San Jose for the
area designated as Parcel 2.
If there are any questions pertaining to the enclosed
tentative parcel map, please contact me.
Very truly yours,
VTN - Bay Area
James o. Webb, Jr.
Licensed Land Surveyor
JOW/cab
Enc.
cc:
City of Campbell/
'I T Y
SA N
JOSE
OF
C:ALIF"ORNIA
November 15, 1972
CITY PLANNING
City of Campbell
flannìng Department
75 No. Central Avenue
Campbell, CA
Gen t lemen :
Subject:
PDC 72-11-160
The enclosed matter was filed with the City of
San Jose and will be considered by the Planning Commission
on January 9, 1973 Your comments on this
matter will be appreciated.
OwNER-APPLICANT
s.
Borello & K. Priestly
LOCATION OF PROPERTY
West side of Bascom, 100 feet
south of Pamlar
292-3141
EXT.576
PRESENT ZONING R-I-B-8 Residence Dist. (One Family, 8,000 sq. ft. lot
area)
REQUESTED ZONING R-I-B-8 (PD)
OTHER:
177 mobile home units on 21.8 acres
Yours truly,
SANFORD GETREU, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
£; 7A. ç~ ~ a.ou.-
Gary J. Sc oennauer, Planner III
#~
180-10
CITY OF
SAN
JOSE
/.' <:./~ I
11)12 .
801 N.
(71/ l¿)~ C , J)
\'51\
CALIFORNIA
FIRST ST.
SAN JOSE, CA 95110
TELEPHONE (408) 292-3141
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
June 2, 1972
Mr. William G. Wren
Director of Public Works
City of Campbell
75 N. Central Avenue
Campbell, CA 95008
Dear Mr. Wren:
We have recently been approached by persons wishing
to develop the Borello property located northerly and west-
erly of the intersection of Bascom Avenue and Hamilton
Avenue in the City of San Jose. Due to its location and
the almost complete development of all the property along
Bascom and Hamilton Avenues, the Borello property has very
limited access to public streets. Except for a very small
frontage on Bascom Avenue, it is completely landlocked.
However, in studying the situation, it is called to
my attention that it is physically possible to gain access
to Hamilton through a piece of undeveloped property lying
within the city limits of the City of Campbell between the
Southern Pacific Railroad crossing and the on-ramp to
Route 17 freeway.
I would appreciate hearing as to whether or not you
would allow access into a Campbell street at this point.
Your earliest attention would be appreciated.
Very truly yours,
~~~
A. R. TURTURICI
Director of Public Works
ART: em
cc: Ed Louis,
Traffic Division
..
~
--f1v.»--J.~ (I L)
I
June 7, 1972
Mr. A. R. Tur~urici,
Public Works Director
City of S;Jn Jose
801 North First S~ree~
Sin Jos., California 95~10
SUBJECTs
Borello Property A~cess
Dear Sira
Responding to yours of June 2, we have for some time
been concerned abou~ ~he complications of access involved in ~he
ul~ima~e development of ~he proper~y you mentioned. There ha'Vecheen
numerous inquiries of this office during ~he pas~ few years from a
varie~y of prospec~ive purchasers and/or developers. Our posi~ion,
consis~ently, has been tha~ no median-crossing (left-~urn) access
would be permi~ted OD ~he Hamilton Avenue fron~age regardless of
circumstance.
Further, it has been our expressed position ~hat "right-turn"
access would be permi~ted only in the event that the nature of the
development involved was of a relatively "low-densityU character.
This lat~er implies tha~ a commercial or high-density residen~ial
development on the substan~ial acreage involved would genera~e
sufficient ~raffic volumes ~hat even the righ~-turn access would be
unworkable.
I should sta~e ~ha~ the aforementioned requirementt are based
upon a presump~ion that ~he8e properties would develop~respec~ive
of the ra~her 8W1twara1p-placed~ity limit line Which div des each of ~hem.
The second paragraph of your le~ter refers ~o a possible access
~o Hamil~on Avenue for ~e Borello piece. Assuming ~his is the easterly
of ~he two Borello pieces in ~he area, the access to Hamil~on Avenue
to Which you refer would have to be accomplished across a neighboring
porcel (priestl~y). Considering this fact and coneidering ~hat it would
be of advantage to the proper~ies to have access bo~h to Bascom and
~o Hamilton Avenues, i~ has always been our hope ~hat all of ~he vacant
parcels in ~his area develop as one or, at the very leas~, in accordance
wi~h 8ome master development plan. Such an approach would give the
advantage of the dual access to all three parcels involved. This seems
especially important because of the restricted nature of the Hamil~on
Avenue access--being "right-turn" only.
..
..
--,
Mr. A. R. Turturici,
Public Works Director
-2-
June 7, 1972
I am not acquainted with the City of San Jose's master plan for
land use in this immediate neighborhood, however, I would sincerely
urge you to influence to Whatever degree you can a limitation on
the development of any sort of "traffic-producing" facility. The
significant traffic corridor which exists here and is further complicated
by the awkward orientation of the freeway ramps and the Southem Pacific
Railroad simply precludes the provision for unlimited local access to
the properties, in my opinion. Therein is the reason for my attempting
to establish the restrictions which are outlined above.
I appreciate your having contacted me in regard to this subject
and sincerely hope that we can discuss it in whatever further detail
is neeessary as development applications are received in your offices.
Very truly yours,
William G. Wren,
Director of Public Works
WGW : cc
cc:
Mr. Ed Louis, Traffic Division
A,
-
" I
---1 : 1/--1
II '- J
,.--
¿ ¿~
.
',.
",,".¡
<!::>W
~þ\
¡~ "
. I,
170ì Woad ~;;¡é'(t . .)",;I;,,¡,;, C;.,i:'rmi;;j Si+Cr)¡ . U::,?J2J.
iNf""'i,YFcC,'.5C¡'C;E,"1ú
"', I,' J, 0
!,,"', It,',i'
",
c) :c. ~: ~;,) ,
-, 'J
0" (,
,J,
d¡,i""',
" L~"'_"""è'M;t.A"D
V,, ,..' ',L LI,
Jl.1X;(;
" ,
,I, -- ~
1 c, 'f' ()
I.'il, ""¡"""f"~Un--(u"~L^,iD
J, "'0 F'OLL"Wi,Y
',""LW"'¡Lr';,C,,r- Lf,KU,""
J, E, L:" '.
¡;'I," '""",c,."',>oI"""T-"^""",,,ÇI"LO
", ,I, ,(1, ",,",'\' iC
,,1\"""" >i"'.'u;r,LR-C ~Lf".D
1:[ c: > :,
CJ,\J:Lt
,', :'>:',] ¡ --.. f.;
;',: , ":LLCCJ':"'.
-;:"7 CC::'l'ICrC:1,;,J C' i',Tcet
;:;-~"i(J:':;:;5 v ".",o:3,()71~~::
LL tcr~ ti C"].
'- ¡ :," .
~
L; .
~ J .
LeCDY
,CT:
;" " ,:
"',-,,-""" .._,-'
....",
::~;:...s;.:
f~/'
,..._,""-'-"""'-"'~-"'-'-'-'--" ",.._--_..,_.._---~..,,>,-_._.~-,...._,~,..'
(;
C~;:Cl) :
..C
',,~, "
TjÇ; ,"ò
~t T,.
"...: 0 v
~. : C" '; (.', ,: c: '",
coe'
2~', JS'?C, C;"Tlc':;r::O:E~
.3C1Jt,}"-'c~;t e>:'~,rc:'",':','e:,-.
Jcfc:nc-;}( c:
:~:; ;':::;(1("; to YO",:}'
.; c' t tel' (j f
iîrc"C':c,~:
~:}' C', "
C' ',.:, ,. c' ,¡ . . ,
'-", ',- " . ,-- '
-
l,'¡', '~; ,t C
,,((~ J. ~:i,J;~¡é,J-
- " .
'.¡lc~(;.:.i
c.;--
,: '.'..:
LVC.nr:r
to
~;:: () '/ j, (; c"
(no
'," .'
~,:)....:~n
,;tc;.:r'é!,::U lE-.llU
:L:'ltc; t"J('
";'D
Sol'tl'~~,)c.)l"':;ld L',nc ,-;
em
:; ;:.i:é:C::C:c1. 1y?-t-;ec:n thc; " 'C,GS ::Cvc"'L,j.ng ~':-c
3CO:; ..-,".::l"~' \'!c"c!ld lléve no ':\],':',(:c' C) ~-'C:é'¡'~,e
(: C C c:.'. (¡
:','o:::d.
'ie hi c
0:1' :'," ,,1 loc;::,i::Lon of "::':.':;" or::, ;,;" "rc'~'c;::cc. Cl'CS(;:" ""'. :'<:' :L~:
vj.rtL;.él:',ly no TC)C::: l.-C, ::-;t; c> [.,è tc:-J;biJos bct','ccn '.(::::'~,e:!.'J.:l(:~
c,f
J3~;Cc..:::,"vcrrce
r:'c c,
t '[-1 C'
: ) :r~ C) ;; 0 .~ c?; d
C: 1:' 0 ::; ;:; :1.:J (' .
Lec(J';S(~ cf tlH: 1:(,.:"\V h?é72.I'dE; L:IV'Jlvc;Ö, [;.:':c\ ')CC"'\':';;¿
[,ÜtcrnFite ClcriC';::;: is éèvajJ,c.bJc;, ,,"'~ COU~:[L::7 \-'::'Jl O'):C C
tiDE of a HC'v: Cl",:',(' c' :j(j S:';;j',.'L on YOl~r " -.~), D.
: ::::'C""'1,
"'e
t:lé'
,. C)~1::; trt'(;-
YO1.1:r'~
t nJy ,
W. W. JONES - J. G. S.
cc:
C:i. ty C:;
C5.~':ý of
Count:,"
C31-.,c'Jt
::':on J O3e
( ('..,,~+
, -' Li,: "
( ",-j-
G:iJley
0 :1";1'1 )
(10;) ::c'J'..tirÜ)
"c. (.1 CCl'r-:;~;,,)
\.;:¡ c\ :'... c',
'l':~ 'é;:
-
I
May 21, 1970
Mr. Sanford Getreu
Director of Planning
City of San Jose
801 North First Street
San Jose, California
ATTENTION:
Mr. Geor:¡e Hammi 11
Planner IV
RE:
Your File No. C-70-4-~)
Gentlemen:
Reference is made to your transmittal of May 6 and Mr. Kee's
reply of May 18.
The position of Campbell's Public Works Department regarding
access to the Borello property from Hamilton Avenue remains
consistent with our past statements on this matter.
We are opposed to any through way connecting Hamilton
Avenue to either Bascom Avenue or Pamlar Avenue at this location.
We are further opposed to any private connections to Hamilton
Avenue at this point which would provide ingress and/or egress
to areas north of Campbell's city limits.
Our position as stated above is based solely on traffic
considerations at this critical location. Please advise if we
can provide any other assistance in this regard.
Very truly yours,
WILLIAM G. WREN,
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
BMH:cc
lt~Ù
By Bill M. Helms,
Associate Civil Engineer
cc:
Robert C. Stephens,
City Mana\~er
Art Kee,
Planning Director
,
11tae ~ ~ & S ØHep4
CIVIL ENGINEERS
" j J J ( '7¿
JI"// í ~ ~i1Þ c.~~
.'1 (';l ~" Î/ ~~8386
I)t~ Jk \þfXi
347 eel MER C I A L S T R E E T
SAN JOSE. CALIFORNIA 95112
PHONE (408) 294-6274
/
I
Aa
May 29, 1970
Southern Pacific Railroad
No.1 Market Street
San Francisco, California
Attention:
Mr. Robert MacDonald
r
I \
I I
Nortt1~;-ly ofl Ls
L_'_~.~ _-~h'~, , ~ "-
", "".
Gatos Creek
Reference:
Access Road, Bascom Avenue,
Zone 415
Gentlemen:
'<>
// ,----'"
/ /"-" \
Enclosed is a preliminary plan f~~ re~~w and comment, to
obtain street access. / / /)
""" .,/ /
This plan has been reviewed on a p~~~~ basis with the Ci ty of
San Jose, the City of Camp~d tìw( '\Ounty of Santa Clara.
It ia our undar.tandin/~~~ i';~ or<Janization has db-
cuseed this with the Pt¡Poa.d <!ev. ¡\'er, Cd-west Communities, Inc.
If you have any , C"Omm8" n~r quest!, 9,1J with regard to this matter,
please do not ~-~!~te ~'~~/~is office.
/" _--h_-:?/"
laVery ::l+r:', n--
. {{j /J1 ~~" ~_/~/
X,---/ "
J. W. HCCoy
JWM:ps
snc.
cc:
City of San Jose (Curt Gilley) w/enc.
City of Campbell (Bill wren) w/enc~ )
County of Santa Clara (~Henini) w/enc.
Cal-West Communities, Inc.(Al Cere.a)
AFFILLIATES IN SUNNYVALE. PLEASANTON . DAVIS. PETALUMA
City of Campbell
75 NORTH ~~ .RAL AVr;NUr; . CAMPßnL. CALI~O~NIA 95008 PI. "IE ]78-8141
l TO
Bill Wren, Director of Public Works
fROM
Ex
Frank T. Lewis, Associate Civil En ineer
SUBJECT Access Bascom Avenue
MESSAGE
DATE Ma
19, 1970
Attached lease find alan delineat:in a ro Os~d aðð~g9 to Bagcom AVQnuQ
immediately north of the proposed Los Gatos Creek Bridge. This access was
submitted for application from a Mr. Fu'ita of MaCKa & Som s.
I talked with Mr. Fujita and said that before we would consider this
approval from the Southern,pacific Railroad Company, as well as, permission
'1
i~ for a driveway or curb return access.
was within our jurisdiction.
Right off-hand I don't see any benefit to the C1ty of Campbell, but I do
foresee a traffic hazard due to the bridge. Mr. Fu'ita'was also ve
reluctant to tell me what the proposed development was to be or what the
ro sed traffic eneration will be.
SIGNED
REPLY
SIGNED
DATE
013 @"
r 7Jr (Î-/tJ:,-(~/ r ..2-)
rl ~J~~I;f\ I mo F
. ¡Vi}:\ f¡~....~.r ~{ti{~'::~'.O;ç2,~\ I "HUB OF THE FABULOUS SANTACLARAVALLEyr
,~ . 'I t "\ 1.11 V
,;;"",--r;--tl-:; t -
75 ,NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE. CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 . TELEPHONE (408) 378-8141
May' 18, 1970
Mr. George Hammill, Planner IV
Department of Planning
City of San Jose
801 North 1st Street
San Jose, California
Ref:
File No. C-70-4-60
Dear Mr. Hammill:
This note is to advise you that we have referred the
plans for development of the Borello property to our
City Engineer for comment on the impact which the
project will have on the traffic flow of Hamilton
Avenue.
From a zoning standpoint, it would seem that the pro-
ject is independent of its affect on adjoining proper-
ties in Campbell, with the exception of traffic flow.
Therefore, we would have no specific recommendations
on this matter.
Thank you for your referral. You should expect to hear
from our engineering department shortly.
Very truly yours,
ARTHUR KEE
Planning Director
AK:GFS:pka
William Wren
cc: Engineering Department
~,;"'ì
'" .ð' , ,
-/ r, . ~)
.4Y-~d.¡(~(L r _t,.C¡::
'~GERALD F. SCOTT
Planner II
CITY OF
SAN
JOSE
CALIFDRr-JIA
May 6, 1970
DEPARTMENT OF
CITY PLANNING
SANFORD GETREU
Director of Planning
Campbell Planning Department
City Hall
75 North Central Avenue
Campbell, California
Gentlemen:
Subject:
Flie No. C-70-4-60
The enclosed matter was filed with the City of
San Jose and will be considered by the Planning CoIT~ission
on June 2. 1970 Your comments on this
matter wfIl be appreciated.
OWNER-APPLICANT
L. Cedric Macabee
LOCATION OF PROPERTY
North of Hamilton, east of Route 17,
south of Pam1ar, west of SPRR
PRESENT ZONING
R-1-B-8 Residence District
REQUESTED ZONING
OTHER:
C-1 Commercial District
Yours truly,
SANFORD GETREU
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
ß~~~
George Hammill, Planner IV
180-10