102 E. Hamilton Ave. (1969)
,
..
..
~
I
December 29, 1969
Mr. Joseph A. Bonacina, City Attorney
611 First National Bank Building
San Jose, California 95113
Dear Mr. Bonacina:
In reference to your letter of July 12, 1966
concerning the City of Campbell vs. E.F. DeVilbiss,
No. 178625, our office would like to know if the
street dedication and agreement were signed.
Very truly yours,
FRAln< T. LEHIS,
ASSOCIATE CIVIL ENGINEER
by Roger A. Gr imsley,
Junior Civil Engineer
RAG: lw
.
a
..
I
GRANT DEED
WE, E. F. and MARILYN DE VILBISS, husband
and wife, hereby grant to the CITY OF
CAMPBELL, a municipal corporation, for
street purposes, all of that certain real
property situate in the City of Campbell,
County of Santa Clara, State of California,
and more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the most southerly corner of that certain parcel
of land condemned to the City of Campbell for the widening of
Hamilton Avenue, by judgment entered into the Superior Court
of the State of California, in and for the County of Santa
Clara, Case No. 100058, on January 20, 1958, a certified copy
of which was recorded on February 13, 1958 in Book 4005 of
Official Records, at page 518, Santa Clara County Records,
said point being in the easterly line of Esther Avenue, 50
feet wide¡
THENCE, northeasterly along a tangent curve concave south-
easterly, having a radius of 20 feet, through a central angle of
90° 341 an arc distance of 31.61 feet, to a point in the southerly
line of Hamilton Avenue, said line being 43 feet, at a right
angle, southerly of the center line of Hamilton Avenue¡
THENCE, easterly along said southerly line of Hamilton
Avenue, a distance of 29.81 feet to the easterly line of land
conveyed to Fred F. Fellman, et ux, by Deed recorded in Book
2364 of Official Records, Page 162, Santa Clara County Records¡
THENCE, southerly along said easterly line of Fred F. Fellman
a distance of 32.00 feet to a line which is parallel with and
75 feet, at a right angle, southerly of the said center line of
Hamilton Avenue¡
THENCE, westerly along said parallel line a distance of
50.00 feet to a point in the easterly line of Esther Avenue,
50 feet wide;
THENCE, northerly along the easterly line of Esther Avenue,
a distance of 11.80 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing
1,506 square feet of land, more or less, and being a portion of
the Northwest 1/4 of Section 35, Township 7 South, Range 1 West,
M.D.B. & M.
of
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have placed our names this
, 19
day
E. F. DE VILBISS
MARILYN DE VILBISS
(Notary Certificate)
I
.t8t.
....... / . 7
/. N. - /<, ~( '-(
I ì ¿. I¿t ..
, i
)
/J'" {J
eity of eampbell
Offic. of the
State 0/ @alifornia
Office of the City Attorney July 12,1966
611 First National Bank B&dg.
San Jose. California 95113
Mr. E. F. DeVi1bi8s
Attorney at Law
102 East Hamilton Avenue
Campbell, California
Re:
City of Campbell vs.
E. F. DeVilbiss,
No. 178625
Dear Mr. DeVilbiss:
Following up my letter to you of June 28th, I would appre-
elate receiving as soon as pos8ib1e, the Agreement sub-
mitted to you.
Very truly yours,
JOSEPH A. BONAClNA,
City Attorney
JAB:be
ee: Mr. William G. Wren
.a
..
I
C9ity of' C9ampbell
Offic. of the
~
611 First National Bank Building
San Jose, California 95113
292-1722
State of' @alifornia
June 28,1966
Mr. E. F. DeVilbiss
Attorney at Law
102 Eas t Hamil ton Avenue
Campbell, California
Re:
City of Campbell,
E. F. DeVilbiss,
Use Permit
Dear Mr. DeVilbiss:
I am enclosing herewith original and copy of proposed
Agreement relative to your Use Permit.
If satisfactory. please sign the same and have your
wife sign in the places provided, and return to me.
Very truly yours,
JOSEPH A. BONACINA
City Attorney
JAB:be
enels. (2)
ee: Mr. William G. Wren
P. S.
The agreements should be acknowledged before a
notary public, and if you have one in your office,
you might have a notary stamp put on the original
and copy.
J. A. B.
-
.. { lC
I
June 27, 1966
Mr. Joseph A. Bonacina
City Attorney
611 Pirst National Bank Building
San Jose, California
RBI
De Vilbiss Dedication
Dear Joe:
Enclosed please find the form of Agreement to be
executed between the City of Campbell and Mr. De Vilbiss
to resolve the matter of the land dedication on
Hamilton Avenue.
I understand that you will transœit the Agreement
to Mr. De Vilbis8, providing that the form i8 satisfactory
to you..
Very truly your s,
WILLIAM G. WREN,
ACTING DIRECTOR OP PUBLIC WORKS
By Bill M. Helms,
As8ociate Civil Engineer
BMH:cb
Enclosures
r ,
,-, ( ",-','
'n " ~ ~ ")
) f '
, . """\
"'- /
¡l,,) . '
ì ..Jc,
\ /. ~"--~-,-
~
I
.....
C9ity of C9ampbell
Office CSir1:81a CitI Attorney
611 Ftr8t Nationa Bank Bl~g.
San Jose, California
292-1722
State of' @alifornia
June 14,1966
Mr. E. F. DeVilbiss
Attorney at Law
102 East Hamilton Avenue
Campbell, CalifOrnia
Re:
Lity of Campbell
VB. E. F. JeVilbiss,
No. 178625
Dear Mr. DeVilbiss:
TI11s confirms my telephone caLl to your o¡fice of today,
advislnL; you that the motion for preliminary injunction
in the above matter has been ordered off calendar.
I have been advised by the City officials that you are
now in complianc.c with the conditions of the use permit,
and that there is only one furtner requirement, that be-
ing the dedication. In this connection, you advised me
earlier that to dedicate at this time might put you in a
bad light with the holders of your security. You did in-
dicate that you would a6ree to dedicate at such time as the
City was ready to proceed with street improvements front-
ing your property.
I will. have the Public harks Department formulate the usual
contract for this purpose, and submit it to you for signa-
ture by you and your wife. When the contract is in our
hands, I wil1 be in a position to dismiss the above-entitled
action.
Very truly yours,
l)/'
,i
;
JOSEPH A. BONAClNA
JAB:be
ccs: Mr. William G. Wren
Mr. Richard V. Hogan
..
..
City 0/ Campbell
Office of the
8lale of Caliform'a
611 Fi~st Natloaa1 B~a~ ßullòin&
San Jose, C¿11£Qr~i~ ?~113
~Jov~mller 9, l~ 6'>
MX. i. ï. De vilb1as
102 !.a~t i1.w.ãl.Î....ton Avenue
Campbell, California
Ite:
Interim Permit
Dear Mr. De Vilbias:
On liaxch 19,1965 I wroce to you r~la~iv~ to VC~~
f.il~re ~O c~mply ~1th c~údi~i~u~ i~L 'UG Uae~rè~mit
órauteè ~O you by City of Campbell.
You subsequently talepnonad œe and indicated tbat
you would write me a lette. anJ tl~~ i~ was your
iuteution to comply.. Thus fat I have ~eceived no
cor~ß~pondènce i~oœ you ù~ any otner word, and
apparently you are stili in default of the condi-
tion~ imp~seJ by th~ pd~mit.
Thi8, of COUXiiê, leaveíi me with ch~ only alternative
of takin¡ such ac~ion as may b. approp~iate in tne
circumataucea.
Very truly yours.
,.
JAB: be
ccs: Mr.
t/Mr.
Mr.
Hr.
JOSEPH 4. aONl\CINA,
City Attorney
Richard V. Hogan
f) iJ.l rlelmÞ
i.. L. Mvrser
Robert C. Stephens
~
..
I
I -I
l IV Aj/l \./1
~
April 6. 1965
STATEMENT
Storm Drainage Fee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '.$170.00
Mr. E. F. DeVilbiss
11"2 Eo Hami 1 ton Avenue
Campbell, California
This is long past due please remit.
(/i~
\ ::. ~/~/.j .-jf---
//1' . I . --
, ) 7/ C- j --
¿¿ ~-:)
~.¡.,
foil .V
~.
li\;' i .
¡:ti
..
-
". / l:ç t' {r-_- - <"'-
" '.(~ I~ ¿u.{/) 1 ~
i
CÙ!J o! Campbell
Office of the
8tate 0/ Caltfornia
March 19,1965
Mr. E. F. De Vilbi..
102 E. Hamilton Avenue
Campbell, California
Dear Mr. De Vilbiss:
With reference to the Permit issued to you in
connection with the development of your propexty
at 102 E. Hamilton Avenue, Campbell, California
as a law office, the matter has been referred to
me for attention by reason of your apparent
failure to comply with the conditions.
I may be obliged to pursue thi8 matter further
if conditions are not complied with. Will you
please communicate with me as promptly as possible?
Very truly yours,
JOSEPH A. BONACINA,
City Attorney
JAB: gg
Cy to:
City Engineer
City Planning Consultant
L-
I
CIty Manager
March t 5, 1965
To:
J. A. Bonaclna, CIty Attorney
From:
Robert C. Stephenl, City Hanager
Subject:
InterIm Permit - E. F. DE Vllal5S
Attached 15 the flte relating to an interim pe~it granted to
Hr. De Vllblss on December 4, 1962.
This office has written a Jetter to Mr. De Vilblss remindIng him
of the conditions with which, to this date. he has made no response
to comp ty. It wou Id appear that he I ntends to take no act Ion,
and so I am turning this matter over to you for enforcement by
legal actIon, If necessary. I hope that this Is not another Baker
Trailer Sales, but it appears that the people we are dealIng with
are slmltar types.
Robert C. Stephens
City Manager
RCS:kg
~: ~~ ~~::¡ ~ :;/?n;z)
Bud Morser
cc:
, - . ¡ ,/~.
.,,-,.' f
'\1.. ")' ," 4J ¿--f_/~L, .'
.~éÿ 'r//z/' ,-
CITY OF CAMPBELL . ~#-¿;;3" í 2K}{¿
CAHPBEL~ c; ~F~¥t43 jr ~~.5 7 ~,~ 3 ¿
'E,F.PEV/LI3J:55 D~~:øf:~3 1%2 '
).1ð.rIJj'" " ,.
In accordance with the provisions of Ordinance #301 of the, Clty.~f'---'""'.....~
County of Santa Clara, State of Call fornla,GY>M-keSi 7 ¿.~;¡~"f~ ~l'
,4 N 9 0"1 Y 5:" ì \ ,~ , ~'
C Y % CJ"3 3 ~+~ .,..-.E. f. DE VILBISS.<t . ,
ð
( I"
~
EJ'-\¡
. 1/
,-<'- ' .¿o
50
,~,,~"_~ýL', ui~ """'" -(--
- ~f-tD
. '\>e 5ð .
INTERIM ZONE PERMIT #13
Campbe 11 ,
Is hereby granted an Interim Zone Permit to a11ow the use of existing dwe11ing &
property 1ocated at 102 East Haml1ton Avenue for Law Office and re1ated parking
area, subject to the following conditions:
- -
, '
.-- 3.
4.
Dedlca~~ to u1timate Haml1ton Avenue P1an Line.
Issuance of encroachment permit to be effective untl1 the City of
Campbe11 widens to the u1tlmate P1an Line.
StOMm Drain Fee in amount of $170.00
8ul1dlng to be brought up to City Code for professlona1 bul1dings.
/---' 1.
, 2.
APPROVED by the P1annlng Commission of the City of Campbe11 on the
4th day of December, 1962, and by the City Counel1 of the City of Campbe11 on the
11th day of December, 1962.
) * t,)&
p L 1('" ';
Ao' ('
: \
/,-'"
CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING COMMISSION
....
)\ . ,
".I /'i ,-,
-~
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF CAMPBELL
~IJ\
¡;,
I'
f'lJ
r
'c-
Od'
/'~é~"
v , .cO I,
. ;.
/ ~ - 14- .,.'~,' --L-,.,
. t. ..-\ :-.. 1',
t
I
,¡,'
....
c! 11 "12'
EXHIBIT "A"
Legal Description of 102 East Hamilton Avenue, campbell, California
~4.r
\)-° \~4-
0 \
. / X~/
. tr..o/r>:-ll:J
~~o'
BEGINNING at the most southerly corner of the parcel
of land condemned to the City of campbell for the widen-
ing of Hamilton Avenue, by Judgment entered in the
Superior Court of the state of california, in and for
the County of Santa Clara, Case No. 100058, on January 20,
1958, a certified copy of which was recorded on February
13, 1958 in Book 4005 of Official Records, at page 518,
Santa Clara County Records, said point being in the
East~rly line of Esther Avenue, 50 feet wide: thence
along said Easterly line of Esther Avenue, S. 00 14' E.
110.85 feet to the, Southwesterly corner of the parcel of
land conveyed to Fred F. Fellman, et ux, by Deed recorded
in Book 2364 of Offici~l Records, at page 162, santa
Clara County Records; thence along the Southerly line of
said parcel of land so conveyed to Fellman, s. 890 26' E.
50.00 feet to the southeasterly corner thereof: thence
along the Easterly line of said parcel of land so con-
veyed to Fellman, N. 00 14' W. 130.85 feet to the
Southerly line of Hamilton Avenue, as condemned to the
City of Campbell, by Judgment hereinabove referred to;
thence Westerly along the said Southerly line of
Hamilton Avenue to a point therein, which is 45.20 feet
perpendicular distant Easterly from the center line of
said Esther Avenue; thence southwesterly on a curve to
the left, tangent to the preceding couse, having a radius
0
of 20 feet, through a central angle of 90 34' an arc
distance of 31.61 feet to the point of beginning, and
being a portion of Lot 1, as shown upon that certain Map
entitled, "Map of P. G. Keith's Subdivision", which said
Map was filed for record in the office of the Recorder
of the County of Santa Clara, state of california, on
January 20, 1890 in Book "D" of Maps, at page 169.
\~
"i)
~~~.
~ P \J'f
A.
i}~
/tf\bt..
,