New SFR - 2002July 11, 2002
Randy and Virginia Milbank
1224 Abbott Avenue
Campbell, CA 95008
Re:
PLN2002-34 - 1224 Abbott Avenue - Site and Architectural Review Permit
Dear Applicant:
Please be advised that at its meeting of July 9, 2002, the Planning Commission adopted
Resolution No. 3444 approving a Site and Architectural Review Permit to allow the construction
of a new single-family residence on the above referenced property.
This action is effective in ten calendar days, unless appealed in writing to the City Clerk by 5
p.m. on Friday, July 19,2002. California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, governs the
time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (408) 866-2140.
Sincerely,
-:PM tvo ~ rm:1L
Darcy Smith
Planner II
cc:
Frank Mills, Building
Chris Veargason, Fire
Harold Housley, Public Works
70 North First Street. Campbell, California 95008-1436 . TEL 408.866.2140 . FAX 408.866.8381 . TOO 408.866.2790
RESOLUTION NO. 3444
BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CAMPBELL GRANTING A SITE AND
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW PERMIT (PLN2002-34) TO ALLOW
THE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
ON PROPERTY OWNED BY RANDY AND VIRGINIA MILBANK
LOCATED AT 1224 ABBOTT AVENUE IN AN R-I-9 (SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT. APPUCATION OF
RANDY AND VIRGINIA MILBANK. FILE NO. PLN2002-34.
After notification and public hearing, as specified by law, and after presentation by the
Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed.
After due consideration of all evidence presented, the Planning Commission did find as follows
with respect to application PLN2002-34:
1. The density of the proposed project site is 3.4 units per gross acre, which is consistent with
the General Plan land use designation.
2. The proposed project is consistent with the R-I-9 (Single-family Residential, 9,000 square
foot minimum lot size) zoning district and meets the minimum setbacks, height restriction of
28 feet, maximum lot coverage of 35 percent, maximum floor area ratio of .45, and parking
requirements of the R -1-9 Zoning District.
3. The proposed project is consistent with the consistent with the policies and the design
guidelines of the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan.
4. The development project consists of a new 4,898 square foot single-family residence at 1224
Abbott A venue.
5. The proposed residence has incorporated design features as required by the San Tomas Area
Neighborhood Plan, including simple rectangular-shaped forms, simple rooflines, simple and
shallow window fenestration, stucco exterior, and high-definition composition tile roofing.
6. The proposed project is well designed and is architecturally compatible with the surrounding
neighborhood and the San Tomas Area Neighborhood.
7. The project is not located in a particularly sensitive environment; and no substantial evidence
has been presented to suggest that there is a reasonably possibility that significant
environmental impacts would result from the project due to unusual circumstances or from
the cumulative impacts of successive projects of the same type in the same place.
8. The project qualifies as a Categorically Exempt project per Section 15303, Class 3 (a),
pertaining to new construction of small structures, of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA).
Planning Commission Resoh..ton No. 3444
PLN2002-34 - 1224 Abbott Avenue - Site and Architectural Review Permit/New Residence
Page 2
Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further finds and concludes
that:
1. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
2. The proposed project, as conditioned, will aid in the harmonious development of the
immediate area.
3. No substantial evidence has been presented from which a reasonable argument could be
made that shows that the project, as currently presented and subject to the required
Conditions of Approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment.
4. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the
neighborhood or the City as a whole.
5. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fees imposed upon the project and
the type of development project.
6. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the Conditions of
Approval and the impacts of the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission grants a new Site and
Architectural Review Permit (PLN2002-34) to allow the construction of a new single-family
residence on property owned by Randy and Virginia Milbank at 1224 Abbott A venue, subject to
the following conditions:
Where approval by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, Public Works
Director, City Attorney or Fire Department is required, that review shall be for compliance with
all applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines, ordinances, laws and
regulations and accepted engineering practices for the item under review. Additionally, the
applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or
Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this development
and are not herein specified.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Plannin2 Division
1. Approved Project: Approval is granted for a Site and Architectural Review Permit to allow
the construction of a new 4,898 square foot single-family residence at 1224 Abbott Avenue.
The building designs and site design shall substantially conform to the project exhibits listed
below, except as may be modified by the Conditions of Approval herein:
a. Set of plans prepared by Mono Space Designs, including colored building elevations.
b. Paint, roofing and rock samples submitted by Randy and Virginia Milbank.
Planning Commission ResOl_..on No. 3444
PLN2002-34 - 1224 Abbott A venue - Site and Architectural Review Permit/New Residence
Page 3
2. Site and Architectural Review Permits Approval Expiration: Within one year from the date
of approval, a building permit must be obtained and construction completed one year
thereafter or the Site and Architectural Review Permit approval shall be void.
3. Fences: Any existing or new fencing shall comply with Section 21.59.090 of the Campbell
Municipal Code. Fencing along the property lines shall be replaced with a six-foot high
"good neighbor" wood fence at the expense of the applicant, unless it is determined to be in
good condition by the Community Development Director.
4. Property Maintenance: The property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash,
debris and weeds until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures
shall be secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or
removed from the property (Section 11.201 and 11.414, 1985 Ed. Uniform Fire Code).
5. Parking and Driveways: All parking and driveway areas shall be developed in compliance
with the approved plans and Chapter 21.50 (Parking and Loading) of the Campbell
Municipal Code. The applicant shall provide decorative pavement within the driveways and
walkways. The design and materials used for the decorative pavement shall be reviewed and
approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits.
6. Garage Door Color: The garage door shall be painted to match the color of the house.
7. Landscaping: The applicant shall submit four (4) sets of a landscape plan which shows a
total of one tree per 2,000 net square feet (existing trees shall count towards this
requirement). The plans shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for
review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit.
8. On-site lighting: On-site lighting shall be shielded away from adjacent properties and
directed on site. The design and type of lighting fixtures and lighting intensity of any
proposed exterior lighting for the project shall be reviewed and approved by the Community
Development Director prior to installation of the lighting for compliance with all applicable
Conditions of Approval, ordinances, laws and regulations. Lighting fixtures shall be of a
decorative design to be compatible with the residential development and shall incorporate
energy saving features.
9. Contractor Contact Information Posting: The project site shall be posted with the name and
contact number of the lead contractor in a location visible from the public street prior to the
issuance of building permits.
Buildin2 Division
10. Permits Required: A building permit application shall be required for each proposed new
structure. The building permit shall include Electrical/Plumbing/Mechanical fees when such
work is part of the permit.
Planning Commission Resol.....on No. 3444
PLN2002-34 - 1224 Abbott Avenue - Site and Architectural Review Permit/New Residence
Page 4
11. Construction Plans: The Conditions of Approval shall be stated in full on the cover sheet of
construction plans submitted for building permit.
12. Size of Plans: The maximum size of construction plans submitted for building permits shall
be 24 inches by 36 inches.
13. Plan Preparation: This project requires plans prepared under the direction and oversight of a
California Licensed Engineer or Architect. Plans submitted for building permits shall be "wet
stamped" and signed by the qualifying professional person.
14. Soils Report: Two copies of a current soils report, prepared to the satisfaction of the
Building Official, containing foundation and retaining wall design recommendations shall be
submitted with the building permit application. This report shall be prepared by a licensed
civil engineer specializing in soils mechanics.
15. Site Plan: Application for building permits shall include an accurate site plan that identifies
property and proposed structures with dimensions and elevations as appropriate. The site
plan shall also include site drainage details.
16. Foundation Inspections: A pad certificate prepared by a licensed civil engineer or land
surveyor shall be submitted to the project building inspector upon foundation inspection.
This certificate shall certify compliance with the recommendations as specified in the soils
report and the building pad elevation and on-site retaining wall locations and elevations are
prepared according to approved plans. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and
certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer for the following items:
a. pad elevation
b. finish floor elevation (first floor)
c. foundation corner locations
17. Title 24 Energy compliance: California Title 24 Energy Compliance forms CF-IR and MF-
lR shall be blue-lined on the construction plans. 8% by 11 calculations shall be submitted as
well.
18. Special Inspections: When a special inspection is required by U.B.c. Section 1701, the
architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be submitted to
the Building Official for approval prior to issuance of the building permits, in accordance
with D.B.C Section 106.3.5. Please obtain City of Campbell, Special Inspection forms from
the Building Inspection Division Counter.
19. Non-Point Source Pollution Control: The City of Campbell, standard Santa Clara Valley
Non-point Source Pollution Control Program specification sheet shall be part of plan
submittal. The specification sheet (size 24" by 36") is available at the Building Division
service counter.
Planning Commission ResOlu.ton No. 3444
PLN2002-34 - 1224 Abbott A venue - Site and Architectural Review Permit/New Residence
Page 5
20. Approvals Required: The project requires the following agency approvals prior to issuance
of the building permit:
a.
b.
c.
West Valley Sanitation District (378-2407)
Santa Clara County Fire Department (378-4010)
School District:
i) Campbell Union School District (378-3405)
ii) Campbell Union High School District (371-0960)
iii) Moreland School District (379-1370)
iv) Cambrian School District (377-2103)
Note: To Determine your district, contact the offices identified above. Obtain the
School District payment form from the City Building Division, after the Division has
approved the building permit application.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
21. Proof of Ownership: Prior to issuance of any grading, drainage, or building permits for the
site, the applicant shall provide a current preliminary title report, grant deed, or other
satisfactory proof of ownership.
22. Work in the Public Ri~ht-of-Way: Prior to doing any work in the public right-of-way, the
applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit, provide plans, pay fees and deposits, post
security, and provide insurance. The driveway approach in the street shall not exceed 25 feet
in width excluding the side flares (tapers).
23. Utilities: All new on-site Utilities shall be installed underground per Section 20.36.150 of
the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings or additions. Applicant
shall comply with all plan submittals, permitting, and fee requirements of the serving utility
companIes.
24. Utility Installation Plan: Prior to issuance of building permits for the site, the applicant shall
submit a Utility Installation Coordination Plan and Schedule for approval by the City
Engineer for installation of street improvements and/or abandonment of all utilities. Streets
which have been resurfaced within the previous 5 years will require boring and jacking for
all new utility installations. Applicant shall also prepare pavement restoration plans for
approval by the City Engineer prior to any utility installation or abandonment.
25. Storm Drain Area Fee: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the
applicant shall pay the required Storm Drain Area fee which is $2,000 per acre.
26. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Measures: Prior to issuance of any grading or building
permits, the applicant shall comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permitting requirements and the California Storm Water Best Management
Planning Commission Resol......on No. 3444
PLN2002-34 - 1224 Abbott Avenue - Site and Architectural Review Permit/New Residence
Page 6
Practices handbook prepared by the Storm Water Quality Task Force, Santa Clara Valley
Water District and the City of Campbell Municipal Code regarding Storm Water Pollution
Prevention.
27. Site Plan: Upon submittal of a formal application, the developer shall provide a complete
and accurate Site Plan in accordance with the Planning Division's checklist.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of July, 2002, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Alderete, Doorley, Francois, Hernandez and Jones
None
None
Gibbons
APPROVED:
Tom Francois, Chair
ATTEST:
Sharon Fierro, Secretary
CAMPBELL
~
ITEM NO.3
ST AFF REPORT - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF
JUL Y 9, 2002
Public Hearing to consider the application of Randy and Virginia Milbank
for a Site and Architectural Review Permit (PLN 2002-34) to allow the
construction of a single-family residence on property owned by Randy and
Virginia Milbank located at 1224 Abbott Avenue in an R-1-9 (Single-
family residential, minimum 9,000 square foot lot size) Zoning District.
PLN 2002-34
Milbank
ST AFF RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission take the following action:
Adopt a Resolution, incorporating the attached findings, approving a Site and
Architectural Review Permit to allow the construction of a single-family residence,
subject to the attached Conditions of Approval and finding that this project is
Categorically Exempt under Section 15301, Class 3 (a), of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) pertaining to new construction of small structures.
PROJECT DATA
Cate20ry
Gross Lot Area:
Net Lot Area:
Density:
Project
.29 acres (12,704 sq. ft.)
.24 acres (10,454 sq. ft.)
3.4 units/gross acre
Proposed Residence:
First Floor (Living):
Attached Garage:
Covered Porch:
Second Floor (Living):
Total (w/o porch):
Total (w/ porch):
2,010 sq. ft.
710 sq. ft.
256 sq. ft.
1,922 sq. ft.
4,642 sq. ft.
4,898 sq. ft.
Building Coverage:
Floor Area Ratio:
Parking Provided:
29% (2,976 sq. ft.)
.44 (4,642 sq. ft.)
3 covered spaces & 3
uncovered spaces
28 ft.
Building Height:
ReQuired/Allowed
.23 acres (9,810 sq. ft.)
.21 acres (9,000 sq. ft.)
Less than 4.5 units/gross
acre
200 square ft. min.
4,704 sq. ft.
35% (3,658 sq. ft.)
.45 max.
2 spaces (1 covered)
28 ft. max.
Staff Report - Planning CoHlmission Meeting of July 9,2002
PLN 2002-34 - 1224 Abbott A venue
Page 2 of 4
Setbacks (Residence):
Front Yard:
Rear Yard:
Side Yard (North-lst/2nd):
Side Yard (South-l st/2nd):
22 ft.
49 ft.
8 ft./ 12 ft. 6 in.
10 ft./ 12 ft. 6 in.
20 ft. min.
25 ft. min.
8 ft. / 60% of wall height
10 ft. / 60% of wall height
DISCUSSION
Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is requesting approval of a Site and Architectural
Review Permit to allow the construction of a new single-family residence at 1224 Abbott
A venue. The project site is located on the east side of Abbott A venue one parcel north of
its intersection with W. Hacienda A venue. The project site is surrounded on three sides
by single-family residences, with the vacant Rolling Hills shopping center site abutting
the subject property to the east.
Background: The subject property is currently developed with a 1,826 square foot
residence and garage that was built in approximately 1954. The structure would be
demolished to allow for construction of the proposed residence.
ANAL YSIS
General Plan Designation: The General Plan land use designation for the project site is
Low Density Residential (less than 4.5 units per gross acre). The density of the proposed
project is 3.4 units per gross acre, which is consistent with the General Plan land use
designation.
The proposed project complies with the following General Plan Land Use Element
policies and strategies:
Strategy LUT-5.2a: Neighborhood Compatibility: Promote new residential
development and substantial additions that are designed to maintain and
support the existing character and development pattern of the surrounding
neighborhood, especially in historic neighborhoods and neighborhoods
with consistent design characteristics.
Strategy LUT-7.2n: Consistency With Plans Ensure that new development
and substantial remodeling projects are consistent with Specific Plans,
Area Plans, City Standard Details, and adopted Streetscape Standards to
create a cohesive design.
Strategy LUT-9.3e: Building Materials: Encourage the use of long-lasting,
high quality building materials on all buildings to ensure the long-term
quality of the built environment.
Strategy LUT -17.1 b: Landscaping: Ensure that new developments provide
new tree plantings, shrubs, greenery and other landscaping materials, and
preserve existing trees and shrubs.
Staff Report - Planning Commission Meeting of July 9,2002
PLN 2002-34 - 1224 Abbott Avenue
Page 3 of 4
Zoning Classification: The zoning classification for the project site is R-I-9 (Single-
family Residential, 9,000 square foot minimum lot size). The proposed residence is
consistent with the zoning designation and meets the minimum setbacks, height
restriction of 28 feet, maximum lot coverage of 35 percent, maximum floor area ratio of
.45, and parking requirements of the R-I-9 Zoning District.
The project site is located in the San Tomas Area Neighborhood and is subject to the San
Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan (ST ANP). Staff finds the proposal consistent with the
policies and the design guidelines of the ST ANP.
Site Layout and Architecture: The site plan shows the construction of a new two-story
residence with an attached three-car garage. The proposed residence has a large front
porch that extends from the front building wall of the residence with a gabled roof form.
The proposed residence has incorporated design features as required by the San Tomas
Area Neighborhood Plan, including simple rectangular-shaped forms, simple rooflines,
simple and shallow window fenestration, stucco exterior, and high-definition composition
tile roofing. Additional elements include wainscoting, porch pillars, and two separate
garage doors that help break up the prominence of the garage on the front façade. The
two-car garage is setback ten feet from the front porch and the one-car garage is setback
twelve feet from the front porch. A second-floor balcony that looks out onto the back yard
has been incorporated into the roofline of the residence to blend in with residence.
The proposed colors for the house include a beige body with a smoky blue colored trim.
The house will have dark composition roofing and a neutral colored rock around the base.
Trees/Landscaping:
There are no trees on the site that are protected under the City's Tree Protection
Ordinance. The applicant is required to provide one tree per 2,000 square feet of net lot
area per the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan; existing trees shall count towards this
requirement. There are currently numerous trees on the perimeter of the site that the
applicant intends to preserve during construction.
Site and Architectural Review Committee: The Site and Architectural Review Committee
reviewed this application at its meeting of June 25, 2002. One Commissioner expressed
concern about the dominance of the garage on the front façade and the white color of the
garage door depicted in the colored elevation. The Commissioners and applicant
discussed painting the garage the same color as the main house in order to make the
garage blend into the house. A Condition of Approval has been added that requires this
consistency.
Staff Report - Planning Col1lmission Meeting of July 9,2002
PLN 2002-34 - 1224 Abbott A venue
Page 4 of 4
Attachments:
1. Findings for Approval of File No. PLN 2002-34
2. Conditions of Approval for File No. PLN 2002-34
3. Exhibits (Site Plan, Floor Plans & Elevations)
4. Development Schedule
5. Location Map
Prepared by:_1)M~ ~
Darcy SmIth, Planner IT
Approved by:
Attachment #1
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF FILE NO. PLN 2002-34
SITE ADDRESS: 1224 Abbott Avenue
APPLICANT: Randy and Virginia Milbank
DATE: July 9,2002
Findings for Approval of a Site and Architectural Review Permit to allow the construction of a
new single-family residence.
The Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to File No. PLN 2002-34:
1.
The density of the proposed project site is 3.4 units per gross acre, which is consistent with
the General Plan land use designation.
2.
The proposed project is consistent with the R-1-9 (Single-family Residential, 9,000 square
foot minimum lot size) zoning district and meets the minimum setbacks, height restriction
of 28 feet, maximum lot coverage of 35 percent, maximum floor area ratio of .45, and
parking requirements of the R -1-9 Zoning District.
3.
The proposed project is consistent with the consistent with the policies and the design
guidelines of the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan.
4.
The development project consists of a new 4,898 square foot single-family residence at
1224 Abbott Avenue.
5.
The proposed residence has incorporated design features as required by the San Tomas
Area Neighborhood Plan, including simple rectangular-shaped forms, simple rooflines,
simple and shallow window fenestration, stucco exterior, and high-definition composition
tile roofing.
6.
The proposed project is well designed and is architecturally compatible with the
surrounding neighborhood and the San Tomas Area Neighborhood.
7.
The project is not located in a particularly sensitive environment; and no substantial
evidence has been presented to suggest that there is a reasonably possibility that significant
environmental impacts would result from the project due to unusual circumstances or from
the cumulative impacts of successive projects of the same type in the same place.
8.
The project qualifies as a Categorically Exempt project per Section 15303, Class 3 (a),
pertaining to new construction of small structures, of the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA).
Findings for Approval- Püdming Commission Meeting of July 9, LvJ2
PLN 2002-34 - 1224 Abbott Avenue
Attachment #1
Page 2 of 2
Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further finds and concludes
that:
1. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
2. The proposed project, as conditioned, will aid in the harmonious development of the
immediate area.
3. No substantial evidence has been presented from which a reasonable argument could be made
that shows that the project, as currently presented and subject to the required Conditions of
Approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment.
4. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the
neighborhood or the City as a whole.
5. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fees imposed upon the project and
the type of development project.
6. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the Conditions of
Approval and the impacts of the project.
Attachment #2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR FILE NO. PLN 2002-34
SITE ADDRESS: 1224 Abbott Avenue
APPLICANT: Randy and Virginia Milbank
DATE: July 9,2002
The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that (s)he is required to meet the
following conditions in accordance with the ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of
California. The lead department with which the applicant will work is identified on each
condition where necessary. Where approval by the Director of Community Development, City
Engineer, Public Works Director, City Attorney, or Fire Department is required, that review shall
be for compliance with all applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines,
ordinances, laws and regulations, and accepted engineering practices, for the items under review.
Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that (s)he is required to comply with all applicable
Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this
development and are not herein specified:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Plannin2 Division
1. Approved Project: Approval is granted for a Site and Architectural Review Permit to allow
the construction of a new 4,898 square foot single-family residence at 1224 Abbott A venue.
The building designs and site design shall substantially conform to the project exhibits listed
below, except as may be modified by the Conditions of Approval herein:
a. Set of plans prepared by Mono Space Designs, including colored building
elevations.
b. Paint, roofing and rock samples submitted by Randy and Virginia Milbank.
2. Site and Architectural Review Permits Approval Expiration: Within one year from the date of
approval, a building permit must be obtained and construction completed one year thereafter
or the Site and Architectural Review Permit approval shall be void.
3. Fences: Any existing or new fencing shall comply with Section 21.59.090 of the Campbell
Municipal Code. Fencing along the property lines shall be replaced with a six-foot high
"good neighbor" wood fence at the expense of the applicant, unless it is determined to be in
good condition by the Community Development Director.
4. Property Maintenance: The property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris
and weeds until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures shall be
secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed
from the property (Section 11.201 and 11.414, 1985 Ed. Uniform Fire Code).
5. Parking and Driveways: All parking and driveway areas shall be developed in compliance
with the approved plans and Chapter 21.50 (Parking and Loading) of the Campbell Municipal
Conditions of Approval- tianning Commission Meeting of July 9, LO02
PLN 2002-34 - 1224 Abbott Avenue
Attachment #2
Page 2 of 4
Code. The applicant shall provide decorative pavement within the driveways and walkways.
The design and materials used for the decorative pavement shall be reviewed and approved
by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits.
6. Garage Door Color: The garage door shall be painted to match the color of the house.
7. Landscaping: The applicant shall submit four (4) sets of a landscape plan which shows a
total of one tree per 2,000 net square feet (existing trees shall count towards this
requirement). The plans shall be submitted to the Community Development Department for
review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit.
8. On-site lighting: On-site lighting shall be shielded away from adjacent properties and
directed on site. The design and type of lighting fixtures and lighting intensity of any
proposed exterior lighting for the project shall be reviewed and approved by the Community
Development Director prior to installation of the lighting for compliance with all applicable
Conditions of Approval, ordinances, laws and regulations. Lighting fixtures shall be of a
decorative design to be compatible with the residential development and shall incorporate
energy saving features.
9. Contractor Contact Information Posting: The project site shall be posted with the name and
contact number of the lead contractor in a location visible from the public street prior to the
issuance of building permits.
Buildin2 Division
10. Permits Required: A building permit application shall be required for each proposed new
structure. The building permit shall include Electrical/Plumbing/Mechanical fees when such
work is part of the permit.
11. Construction Plans: The Conditions of Approval shall be stated in full on the cover sheet of
construction plans submitted for building permit.
12. Size of Plans: The maximum size of construction plans submitted for building permits shall
be 24 inches by 36 inches.
13. Plan Preparation: This project requires plans prepared under the direction and oversight of a
California Licensed Engineer or Architect. Plans submitted for building permits shall be "wet
stamped" and signed by the qualifying professional person.
14. Soils Report: Two copies of a current soils report, prepared to the satisfaction of the
Building Official, containing foundation and retaining wall design recommendations shall be
submitted with the building permit application. This report shall be prepared by a licensed
civil engineer specializing in soils mechanics.
Conditions of Approval- .nanning Commission Meeting of July 9, LO02
PLN 2002-34 - 1224 Abbott Avenue
Attachment #2
Page 3 of 4
15. Site Plan: Application for building permits shall include an accurate site plan that identifies
property and proposed structures with dimensions and elevations as appropriate. The site
plan shall also include site drainage details.
16. Foundation Inspections: A pad certificate prepared by a licensed ciyil engineer or land
surveyor shall be submitted to the project building inspector upon foundation inspection.
This certificate shall certify compliance with the recommendations as specified in the soils
report and the building pad elevation and on-site retaining wall locations and elevations are
prepared according to approved plans. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and
certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer for the following items:
a. pad elevation
b. finish floor elevation (first floor)
c. foundation corner locations
17. Title 24 Energy compliance: California Title 24 Energy Compliance forms CF-IR and MF-
1R shall be blue-lined on the construction plans. 8Y2 by 11 calculations shall be submitted as
well.
18. Special Inspections: When a special inspection is required by UB.c. Section 1701, the
architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be submitted to
the Building Official for approval prior to issuance of the building permits, in accordance
with UB.C Section 106.3.5. Please obtain City of Campbell, Special Inspection forms from
the Building Inspection Division Counter.
19. Non-Point Source Pollution Control: The City of Campbell, standard Santa Clara Valley
Non-point Source Pollution Control Program specification sheet shall be part of plan
submittal. The specification sheet (size 24" by 36") is available at the Building Division
service counter.
20. Approvals Required: The project requires the following agency approvals prior to issuance
of the building permit:
a.
b.
West Valley Sanitation District (378-2407)
Santa Clara County Fire Department (378-4010)
School District:
i) Campbell Union School District (378-3405)
ii) Campbell Union High School District (371-0960)
iii) Moreland School District (379-1370)
iv) Cambrian School District (377-2103)
c.
Note: To Determine your district, contact the offices identified above. Obtain the School
District payment form from the City Building Division, after the Division has approved the
building permit application.
Conditions of Approval- 1 .anning Commission Meeting of July 9, Lù02
PLN 2002-34 - 1224 Abbott A venue
Attachment #2
Page 4 of 4
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
21. Proof of Ownership: Prior to issuance of any grading, drainage, or building permits for the
site, the applicant shall provide a current preliminary title report, grant deed, or other
satisfactory proof of ownership.
22. Work in the Public Right-of-Way: Prior to doing any work in the public right-of-way, the
applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit, provide plans, pay fees and deposits, post
security, and provide insurance. The driveway approach in the street shall not exceed 25 feet
in width excluding the side flares (tapers).
23. Utilities: All new on-site Utilities shall be installed underground per Section 20.36.150 of
the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings or additions. Applicant
shall comply with all plan submittals, permitting, and fee requirements of the serving utility
companIes.
24. Utility Installation Plan: Prior to issuance of building permits for the site, the applicant shall
submit a Utility Installation Coordination Plan and Schedule for approval by the City
Engineer for installation of street improvements and/or abandonment of all utilities. Streets
which have been resurfaced within the previous 5 years will require boring and jacking for all
new utility installations. Applicant shall also prepare pavement restoration plans for approval
by the City Engineer prior to any utility installation or abandonment.
25. Storm Drain Area Fee: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the
applicant shall pay the required Storm Drain Area fee which is $2,000 per acre.
26. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Measures: Prior to issuance of any grading or building
permits, the applicant shall comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permitting requirements and the California Storm Water Best Management
Practices handbook prepared by the Storm Water Quality Task Force, Santa Clara Valley
Water District and the City of Campbell Municipal Code regarding Storm Water Pollution
Prevention.
27. Site Plan: Upon submittal of a formal application, the developer shall provide a complete
and accurate Site Plan in accordance with the Planning Division's checklist.
I ! I i
I I
I ;!
I ,
CI!¡~
en! II!
IIII:§ hi..
~:I UII
\
)'
í
i I!!
S 5 ul
I
t
I
5
I
I I
~ ..
II: ~
gCÐ
~~ 0
a!ž~ lie(
I ¡5 I
Attachment #3
NEW RESIDENCE
OWNER:
MR. AND MRS. MILBANK
ADDRESS:
1224 ABBOn AVENUE
CAMPBELL, CA 95008
GENERAL NOTES
~ ~.."~~~.!!!!f"=-- ~ ar
ï:.T'..;¡¡y~ ~ -;;:a-':" or-==: ~ pro= -.
~"'~~:¡m.*P--
==-~~~~~-
~
=*~~V.:A$~-=--"'Ibe
~""~J:~~~
ë;iiii8i~ -:r ~ ~
æ&." ~ .s;~~.=æ:~1 ~
to 't:"~ ~~.... - ...118""" --
~ ...n - :ft.-~ ~~ ~, d~" lid
=i.,j¡¡:~~~~
........
~~.A""'..=e ~ --... -.. '" -. po.
~i:V.be_~_or
or -~...':.:'.: .-.. Iar-
.....=..u.: .~ ~It~ -.or
~ .... _I." -.....,...n '" -..- """
~~~IIIJ"~~~~~
~ ~ ~~ -.:J r.:- -::y .-=-
~'fr~~I'd::1iit.i =1:';
II.AI.a1o1lzlOt Mar - u'or_-,I!I*'8.""'" - ..or-.
- Irg-.¡ M - - - '" ""..... IIà
~ vo- ,... - - ID - _118 IU1dM
..-.......--_.,..._---.......-.
~~l¡8i!ø ~n"",- M 8'I 81D be - .. - - -.... CII'I
n. - II pUI>III .... '" be - Ie' - .....- .,.,..
.. - ... ..... - ,... -liarlp -- olin.
II._""---~"'ber<r ~ ......
~r:::..._IIII- "'- - - '" be "'T-U
i ~ ~~ ~ =1t."=,,.':...~:;:r.=-..
~___ID__.'-
SCOPE OF WORK
œ1CL18II!D ÐCIfINi ~ All) lILT
l1li 'IIJC) ~ INII.E M1L y IIOUR
PRO.JECT DATA
PARCEL NO. 408-15-010
ZONING R11
amNEA 10,414 SQ. FT.
EXISI1NCI FIRST FLOOR 1,442 SQ. FT.
EXISI1NCI CWWIE 884 SQ. FT.
EXISI1NCILMNO SPACE & QARAGE 1,828 SQ. FT.
PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR 2010 SQ. FT.
PROPOSED IECOND FLOOR 1,122 SQ. FT.
TOTAL LIVING SPACE 3,832 SQ. FT.
PORCH ZII8 SQ. FT.
NEW CWWIE . 3 CAR 710 SQ. FT.
TOTAL LMNG SPACE + QARAIIE 4,1142 SQ. FT.
am CCMIIAOE 21%
FAR 4ð
INDEX
ARCHITECTURAL
"'01 COVER SHEEr, SITE PLAN AND VlClNnY MAP
"'02 PROPOSED RRST FLOOR PLAN
"'03 PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN
A.O4 PROPOSED FRONT AND REAR ELFIATIONS
A.O48 PROPOSED COLORED FRONT ELFIATION
"'05 PROPOSED SIDE El.!VATIONS
~'o~~'i; . -~ ....¿'f~::=-j ~~II
~-1.J!i -r <ß ,,~(i! ¡. ......,.,""!'-l'
j;"""""'" ,,~11 g~u",~~'
~ .,,~ -.Q ',~_.'~' ;'::'V!&r.
\\ ;.1 J.~",;,~~"';-'9<i
'EÇ.,'~~'11 ",..""""" -1>"'-
~~~;~~o--n:~ oc~~=1 ,"£"!"'~~'-
~'o...\,-I>* .il'!'~.'
"'~~'",'¡'f"~ . t. ,"'"7u'1c"':¡C<t'=~1
H.'\/ ~. ~..I...Q..1.'-.'.'"
\ '- ~.r' . u' ."....01
. \ " . ""....,." [.'1 i ,~.
.t~-~ 9~~-~L~:T~(~. l-r~~-
~.' .. ~..... . <i.'),.......",,:~.~" ". "'..f. :«'P~<A~.. ~...;
ij - -',' ,¡¡"'" . >W';' -,~,~ .- .$-,
I-: !I .~ .".!'.\~>~~, 1
. .. . ,,""J'."'.'" DC
. ,,="'~'=
--
.......
!I'
'I'
ã
LCOCAT1CON
224 ASIIOTT AVE.
:PBELL, CA -
~I~
,
r'- I
"....
-
I
......,.,... DAlII
-
-
-... .-....
CL- ........,.,AI.
I
I
~
..
.....
õi:
!II
¡
MSD
.
~
I
!I
,
81
II
I
~
..
....
C;¡
MONO SPACE DESIGNS
1120 sount SECOND""""""
BAN oIOBE. CAUFOR-"" 1 2
4081127-7778 "AX 4081283-21'"
......., ................. -_.oom
II
II ~I~
..
1),8,"" -
1),8,"" a_-
ICoOLI!o ...-
- ... v.-.o
.........
..-
õ
IIeT mu.
if L ...... t ~ SHEET, SITE,
_____1----:------------- ""::L::<p::"N..: -----------------------1 ':':DVlCINITYMAP
G) VICINITY ~
N
0
0 SITE & ROOF P~S
NO
AO1
%1
J
ioi
I
\
,
;
io
"-4'
.
.
'r
.
-I
't,
io
~
8"'"
...-,.
.'...
,...,.
l~--l
,:--cJ
I
I
I
=-=J
I
___cd
I
I
I
I
I
ra.:tÞ
I
I
I
.'..,. I r..
-
""IIJ'
-
0
--
-
-üiilCüit---
II \
!it
'I'
I"
I!
16"'"
"-
;
."'IIJ'
."IIJ'
If'
mIõIIII
--,
'>
I
L
.'..,.
0'4'
-,j;~l(",
.. / ,
TI m&mr;
~ j-::ã
~-d'
e:KII
.
..-,.
1 ' PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR
~EB
!it
't
.
LEGEND
If
.
--.....
======= -....-
... -
... -
GENERAL NOTES,
--"'_........_,
.......... - - - --
------..-
__"'.__M"'"
___M_-
"'-.--
---...------
-_II'IUI--"-
~I '
io I
--"'-----fP
-_fP_---
....--.....---
--"'.---.
----.-fPa8"""
-""""fP----
__ar.,,---
- ... - ..--
--"'_..._-
-...--.----
.... - - ... ...... T - -
--.....-
----,,---
------ '-'--"
fP-'-----""--
------...
~
2
..------
--."ac.
- .... ..... ..... . --
"".-fP--'lA8f11.-
__"'__T._---
------.-
- -...
--fP-"-".---
--.----
fP--""""fP."'---
__._"""'118--_--
....-.......-
-..--
----.....
"lI.T_____.
- - at"""'" - - .... T
--
---..-..
--
ž
J
!I
,
.
"",__"""""T__-
-_fP_---
..----,..
-_fP_-----
"-fP--"--
"-fP----
..... .......... ....... - - -
- - -...-
LDCAT1ION
ï- I
-....... DATIl
....."" 10--'"
~"""""AL
MSD
MONO SPACE DESIGNS
1220 SOUTH 811COND 8TR88T
BAN JO8I!, CALIPOIIMA 881 12
4O8ID7-7778 """""""""""43
-, """"""....--.oom
DoOTIIo -
........ a_.....
....... ...-
- N.V""""
CO8CICII).
.... nn.a.
PROPOSED FIRST
FLOOR PLAN
..........
A.O2
9 ¡
.
I I
I ~ !
( 01
Ch=¡¡
Uil
"'Uli
VIrf.8 I!
( ~'¡I:
~iU5"
IlIlea UtJ
II II
~:t
ul
5 5
EB
I
!I
'I'
.
!I
,
.
! I
Ir !I
t ..
i-
!I
J
.
!I
'I'
.
b I .: I II I!II ;III !R.IIII
.. ¡i . ~I ! I¡I, !IIII! I!!II ,!Ii !Ih :. ¡. ¡I!!!b
Iii LII¡ IIIIIIII!!II! 111I111 I! iii! li!i !lllii ¡ 111111111
Ii , I. i~ .q= eq illt III 11'111. ~Iì- pi . I il Ullli'
.~ I.d h Ii ~lli Ii Ii J 1111 n hill Ib! !II; II Ii !lIlii~1
I
~ I
i p
. II.
Il ¡in
!I
?
¡[I
I i
íj,l] '0.
.....
.M",«
..... .M""
......
..... ... ,....
Î
.---.------
l
-- -~,-.-_._u.__._- ~
c
~ CW)
fd 0
~~ .(
go.
~ ~a: ~
I Œ~ I
,
~
..
!I
~
!I
~
,
..
~
!
g
i
fi)
i
~II
i ¡
9 I
I I
I ; !
¡.
Ii,
I
I
"
.:
¡
I
I
'>Mol"'.
~
~
~
!ž
~
I.
If
,I
,I
I ..:
Ci Iii
( )~ II~
11.'" !
III ~IIII::
~ã ~~¡;;
...::: :E § II J
"
f
=
II
.....
i'li
~ .. )i
a.. :t
II ul
~
II:
DC/)
~~
~ !z~
I ~5
8
/--~ì:1I
\ ,~
) .,
, I
~ I
\
\~'1
þ
~
..... (8 " ....9
~
0
.c
~
I
I
5
I
II:
I ( vi
5 zr~
CIJI
I ( )U!~
~. ~
I ~~hÎ"
;! ~U ]
I
II
~
.
.....
.....
! ~ II
'o!
ill
5 §
C/)
z
0
Ii
¡¡;
~¡¡
Ii
...... .....
.....
,-I
\
'J'
í)
/ I"
~.
I
~
10
0
c(
~
I
~
0
(
!
~
5
~
Attachment #4
Mr. & Mrs. Milbank
Development schedule for 1224 Abbott Ave.
Inspection for demo permit
1 week
Disconnect power & gas
2 weeks
Demo
2 weeks
Grading, foundation & floor joists
4.5 weeks
Under house plumbing & heating
Insulation sub-floor 1st & 2nd floor framing
4 weeks
9 weeks
Roofing, doors, windows & exterior paper
3 weeks
Electrical & ruff plumbing
3 weeks
Insulation & Drywall
2 weeks
Exterior finished
3 weeks
Interior finished
9 weeks
Hook up power & gas
2 weeks
Landscaping
4 weeks
Attachment #5
ø Hf8 §WJj
~
Location Map
1224 Abbott Ave
P LN2002-34
Site & Architectural Review Permit
N
Scale A
1" = 500' ~
o'i ' CAItt,ò
.::...,' ~ (9
!::::: ~
U r-
-' -'-
1- '-
". ,-,'
'ORCH""O'
~ -----
CITY OF CAMPBELL
Community Development Department - Current Planning
June 28, 2002
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Campbell has set the time of
7:30 p.m., or shortly thereafter, on Tuesday, July 9, 2002, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 70
North First Street, Campbell, California, for a Public Hearing to consider the application of
Randy and Virginia Milbank for a Site and Architectural Review Permit (PLN2002-34) to allow
the construction of a new single-family residence on property owned by Randy and Virginia
Milbank located at 1224 Abbott Avenue in an R-I-9 (Single Family Residential) Zoning
District. This project is Categorically Exempt.
Interested persons may appear and be heard at this hearing. Please be advised that if you
challenge the nature of the above project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues
you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing described in this Notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City of Campbell Planning Commission at, or prior to, the
Public Hearing. Questions may be addressed to the Community Development Department at
(408) 866-2140.
Decisions of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council. Appeals must be
submitted to the City Clerk in writing within 10 calendar days of an action by the Commission.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, listening assistive devices are available
for all meetings held in the Council Chambers. If you require accommodation, please contact the
Community Development Department at (408) 866-2140, at least one week in advance of the
meeting.
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF CAMPBELL
SHARON FIERRO
SECRETARY
PLEASE NOTE:
When calling about this Notice,
please refer to File No. PLN2002-34
Address: 1224 Abbott Avenue
70 North First Street. Campbell, California 95008-1436 . TEL 408.866.2140 . FAX 408.866.8381 . TDD 408.866.2790
m ~ ffililjj
~
Location Map
1224 Abbott Ave
PLN2002-34
Site & Architectural Review Permit
N
Scale A
1" = 500' ~
~.~O'i' CAItt,ò,s.
!::::: ~
U r-
. .
-' "-
'So '-
<" ,-,'
'0 .
RCH" ,,0
CITY OF CAMPBELL
Community Development Department - Current Planning
June 18,2002
Re:
PLN2002-34 - 1224 Abbott A venue - Site and Architectural Review Permit
New Single Family Residence
Dear Applicant:
Please be advised that the above-referenced application has been scheduled for the following
meetings:
Site and Architectural Review Committee Meeting
Date: Tuesday, June 25, 2002
Time: 5:55 p.m.
Location: Doetsch Conference Room, City Hall, 70 N. First Street, Campbell
Planning Commission Meeting
Date: Tuesday, July 9, 2002
Time: 7:30 p.m.
Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 70 N. First Street, Campbell
Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at (408) 866-
2140.
Sincerely,
1JMWf ~
Darcy Smith
Planner IT
cc:
Randy and Virginia Milbank (Applicant/Property Owners)
1224 Abbott A venue
Campbell, CA 95008
70 North First Street. Campbell, California 95008-1436 . TEL 408.866.2140 . FAX 408.866.8381 . TOO 408.866.2790
..\,.. o~ . CA-11..o~
t:: ....
U ['"
0 0
.. t-
~ ~'
'O'CH",Q'
City of Campbell -- Community Development Department
70 N. First Street, Campbell, CA 95008
MEMORANDUM
To:
Site and Architectural Review Committee
Date:
June 18,2002
From:
Darcy Smith, Planner II -p. ,$ .
Subject:
1224 Abbott Avenue - PLN 2002-34
Site and Architectural Review Permit for the development of a single-family residence
Proposal
The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the Site and Architectural
Review Permit for the development of a single-family residence.
The zoning designation for the project site is R-1-9 (Single-family Residential, 9,000 square foot
minimum lot size). The proposed project is consistent with this zoning designation and meets the
minimum setbacks, height restriction, lot coverage, floor area ratio and parking requirements of the R-
1-9 Zoning District.
The project site is located in the San Tomas Area Neighborhood and is subject to the San Tomas Area
Neighborhood Plan (ST ANP). Staff finds the proposal consistent with the policies and the design
guidelines of the STANP.
Outstandin2 Issues
Staff does not have any issues with the proposed project.
Attachment: Reduced site and floor plans and elevations
/'-1
s
s.ç+ t
I
} <;~Cè"'<
IèES.
~
t::
~
.~
~
'\
I.JN ill"'.
;1"1(-1 -':! Go.",c...\o.
~
~
~
~
~
I d.L c.¡ /} 8ßo77 A ¡J £
~~.
....
t p- ,Dr
:l~-f+~ '2 ~ToR~
-t'" ~EÇ.
~
\:)
tV'
J 1
¿¥-I+ 10i,...
--- ---1 ~ "-
~
Íil
~
/'
-v.
~
í
C.
-I
SOIL INVESTIGATION
FOR
MILBANK RESID EN CE
AT
1224 ABBOT AVENUE
CAMPBELL, CA
PREP ARED
BY
TKS ENGNIEERS & ASSOCIATES
305 HAZEL TON COURT, MORGAN HILL, CA 95037
TEL. (408) 776 9562
FOUNDATION INVESTIGATION
MILBANK RESID EN CE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
1
2. GENERAL GEOLOGIC AND SITE CONDITIONS
1
3. FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING
2
4. SOILCONDITIONS
3
5. DESIGN STUDIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
i. Grading
ii. Foundations
iii. Surface Drainage
iv. Tests and Inspections
6. LIMITATIONS
3
3
4
4
4
5
APPENDIX A
FILL SPECIFICATIONS
6
LOCATION MAP
PLATE NO.1
8
~-ID
LOG OF TEST HOLES
PLATES NO.2-3
SOIL PROFILE LEGEND
PLATE NO
, I
Tel. (408) 866 4668
Fax (408) 378 2405
1. INTRODUCTION
It is proposed to construct a residential building at 1224 Abbot A venue, in Campbell, California,
95008. The proposed construction will consist of two-story wood frame with raised wood floor.
Spread footings are desired. There is an existing single story building at this location with no
signs of distress seen in the structure. Foundation loads associated with the project will be light.
Grading requirements call for relatively minor cuts and fills.
The investigation was conducted in general conformance with our proposal. The geotechnical
study conducted at this site is prepared for the use of the architect and engineer for application to
the design of the residence in accordance with the generally accepted geotechnical engineering
practices. No warranty is expressed or implied. This report presents the results of this study.
2. GENERAL GEOLOGIC AND SITE CONDITIONS
The exposed surface of the site is composed of Pleistocene age Older Alluvium. The
sediment consists of dissected alluvial deposits consisting of sands, silts, and clays. The site is
located in Seismic Zone 4 (UBC) and structures should be designed accordingly. The closest
fault system is the Monte -Vista Shannon Fault System located approximately I mile northeast of
the site. The next closest fault capable of generating an earthquake is the San Andreas Fault
located approximately 5 miles southwest of the site.
Due to the relative proximity of the Monte - Vista Shannon fault zone and other faults to
the site, there is a reasonable possibility that the site will be subjected to a moderate to severe
amount of shaking from a seismic event during the life of the structure. The California Division
of Mines and Geology assigns a probabilistic (10% probability of exceeding that motion in a 50
year period) peak horizontal ground acceleration for surface soil at the subject site of 0.6g to 0.7g
based on an interpretation of color patterns of the Santa Clara County area plotted on a seismic
hazard map of California. (California Division of Mines and Geology, 1999, Seismic Shaking Hazard Maps of
California, CDMG Seismic Shaking Hazard Map Sheet 48.) A detailed analysis of earthquake induced
liquefaction for the proposed site was outside the scope of our investigation.
The following parameters maybe used for design of structures (1997 UBC) at the subject site.
The closest fault that could qualify for near source accelerations is the Type B Monte - Vista
Shannon Fault located 1 mile northeast of the site. No near source factors should be applied for
faults whose distance is greater than 15 km (9.3 mi). (UBC)
SOIL DESIGN PARAMETERS for 1997 UBC
Seismic Zone 4, Z
Soil Profile Type, SD
Closest Seismic Source Type
Seismic Co-efficient, Ca
Seismic Co-efficient, Cv
Distance to Monte - Vista Shannon Fault:
040
B
0.57
1.02
I mile
At the time of our investigation an existing house occupied the site. The house is a single-
story, wood framed structure with a detached garage and concrete driveway (see Location Map,
Plate No.1). The existing structures are approximately 50 years old and appeared to be
performing well. No excessive cracking or movement of the structures or foundations was
observed. A few minor shrinkage cracks were observed in the concrete flatwork. The subject site
is flat and landscaped with grass, flowers, trees, shrubs, and concrete flatwork. The surrounding
area is generally residential. The subject lot is bordered on the north by residential development
and on the east by a large vacant lot. Abbot Avenue borders the site on the west and West
Hacienda Drive borders the site to the south.
3. FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING
The field investigation conducted at this site consisted of 2 shallow exploratory test holes.
The locations of the test holes are shown on the Location Map, Plate No.1. The location of the
test holes is approximate. Sampling of the test hole was performed at various intervals by a 2.25
inch outer diameter hand sampler (HS) driven by a IS-pound hammer with a 18-inch drop. Blow
counts required to drive the HS 4 inches were recorded. These blow counts were converted to
Standard Penetration blow counts for 12 inches. The sampler was lined with stainless steel tubes
to allow for sample recovery. This information is presented on the Log of Test Boring, Plate
Nos. 2 and 3.
Relatively undisturbed soil samples obtained from the test holes were taken to the
laboratory and used for performing various laboratory tests. Tests performed consisted of
moisture contents and unit weights. A summary of the test results is presented on the Log of
Boring Sheets, Plate Nos. 2 and 3.
2
4. SOIL CONDITIONS
Visual classification according to ASTM D2488 (Visual - Manual Procedure) of each soil
stratum encountered in the test holes was made in the field by an engineer at the time the test
holes were excavated. A classification, in-situ description, and graphical representation of each
soil encountered is presented on the Log of Test Boring Sheets. The Boring Legend is presented
on Plate No.4
The soil conditions were fairly consistent between the two test holes. Subsurface
conditions consisted of 4 to 7.5 feet of sandy-silt underlain by sandy clay to the maximum depths
explored. The sandy silt was loose to medium dense and moist to very moist. The sandy clay was
medium stiff to stiff and moist. At the time of testing, free ground water was not encountered in
the test borings. For a more detailed description of the soils encountered in the test holes see the
Log of Test Borings, Plate Nos. 2 and 3. Log of Test Borings show subsurface conditions at the
date and locations indicated and it is not warranted that they are representative of subsurface
conditions at other locations and times.
5 DESIGN STUDIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS
From a soil engineering standpoint, it is our opinion that the site is suitable for
construction of the proposed residence. However, all of the conclusions and recommendations
presented in this report should be incorporated in the design and construction to avoid soil and
foundation problems. The main items of consideration are the loose to medium dense surface
soils located at foundation depths and the very moist soil conditions across the site. We
recommend a wider footing and lower bearing pressures for the proposed residence to reduce the
potential for foundation settlement.
. Gradin2
The existing residence will be razed to accommodate the proposed construction. After
demolition, the site should be cleared of all debris generated from the demolition, the old
foundation, concrete flatwork, surface organic growth, trees, loose soil, and debris. The stumps
of any trees located within the proposed building pad should be removed. During stump removal
all roots greater then 2 inches in diameter should be grubbed out. Voids resulting from stump and
root removal should be cleaned out of all loose soil and backfilled with engineered fill during
filling operations. After clearing the exposed subgrade should be scarified, moisture conditioned,
and compacted as outlined in Appendix A. After scarification and recompaction, any required
fills for the building pad should be placed and compacted as specified in Appendix A. On site
sandy silts may be used as engineered fill. The sandy silt fill should be moisture conditioned and
compacted to at least 90 percent of a Modified proctor dry density (ASTM Dl 557). Engineered
fill should extend a minimum of 5 feet beyond proposed foundation lines or under any perimeter
sidewalks or other exterior concrete flatwork.
3
.
Foundations
If demolition and grading is accomplished as specified, foundations may consist of
conventional spread footings. Subsurface conditions encountered at foundation levels consist of
loose sandy silt. The foundation recommendations provide a comparatively low soil bearing
pressure to reduce the potential for foundation settlement. Footings should have a minimum
width of 15 inches and should be carried to a minimum depth of 18 inches below surrounding
grade. Footing reinforcement should be designed by the structural engineer. However, as a
minimum, footing reinforcement should consist of I - #5 bar top and bottom (total of 2 bars) for
continuous footings. Foundations constructed in this manner may be loaded to a bearing capacity
of 1000 pounds per square foot total load. Bearing capacity may be increased by 1/3 for
temporary wind and seismic loads. Potential settlement, either immediate or long term, of
foundations constructed and loaded in this manner should be less than I-inch total and v'¡-inch
differential.
. Surface Draina2e
Performance of foundations and concrete flatwork is influenced by the moisture
conditions existing within the foundation soils. The risk of wetting foundation soils can be
reduced by carefully planned and maintained surface drainage. Surface drainage should be
designed to provide rapid runoff of surface water away from the proposed building. The ground
surface surrounding the exterior of the building should be sloped to drain away from the
structure in all directions. We recommend a minimum slope of at least 2% for 5' possibly
extended to 10'. The ground surface should be sloped so that water will not pond adjacent to the
building. Landscaping should be carefully designed to minimize irrigation near the building
foundations. Plants used close to foundation walls should be limited to those with low moisture
requirements; irrigated grass should not be located within 5 feet of the foundation. Sprinklers
should not discharge within 5 feet of foundations.
Tests and Inspections
Our office should be afforded the opportunity of reviewing the completed foundation and
grading plans to verify that our recommendations have been properly interpreted and
incorporated. Unless our office is allowed this opportunity, we disavow any responsibility from
any problems arising from failure to follow the recommendations or improper interpretation and
implementation of our recommendations.
Our office should be retained to perform the recommended grading control. Unless we
are retained to provide these services, our office cannot be held responsible for problems arising
during or after construction that could have been avoided had these services been performed. The
fees for these services are in addition to that associated with this report.
4
6
LIMIT A TIONS
The recommendations of this report are based on the information provided regarding the
proposed construction as well as the subsoil conditions encountered at the test hole locations. If
the proposed construction is modified, or if it is found during construction that subsurface
conditions differ from those described on the test hole logs, the conclusions and
recommendations of this report should be considered invalid unless the changes are reviewed
and the conclusions and recommendations modified or approved in writing. The analysis,
conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on the site conditions, as
they existed at the time we excavated our test holes. It is assumed that the test holes are
representative of the subsurface conditions throughout the site.
If there is a substantial lapse of time between the submission of our report and the start of work
at the site, or if conditions have changed due to natural causes or construction operations at or
adjacent to the site, we urge that our report be reviewed to determine the applicability of the
conclusions and recommendations considering the changed conditions and time. This report is
applicable only for the project and at the site studied. This report should not be transferred to a
third party without the express written consent of this office. Our recommendations are in
accordance with generally accepted engineering principles and practices. Test findings and
statements of professional opinion do not constitute a guarantee or warranty, expressed or
implied.
~ ~ /" z...---
T. K. Singh, P.E.
RCE C-54618
nr, C¡:: "$f
((\-"-,, .'.:J °eV
~~/-~4(
i~/ r: ,_!,~'. ~¡NGH \~...
\\ ""'N~,)12 \ ,01
"'...ex. r>MfJ). ../ ~
C ',Jll /
.'.', '- ~.' ,,'"
- ;,:»-------_J ",'" '"
'" ,.~- ;.,~ ~.'\ \tV'"
'-..........~' './~'
5
Foundations
APPENDIX A
Site Preparation and Grading:
The ground surface should be prepared for grading by removing vegetation, large
roots, debris, and other deleterious materials.
2
To help reduce the effect of soil expansion on slabs, a minimum of 6 inches of
nonexpansive material should be placed in the slab areas. Nonexpansive import could
also be used to reduce the effects of soil expansion on exterior flatwork and other
improvements.
3
The nonexpansive import should have a plasticity index of 8 or less when tested in
conformance with ASTM D 4318-95 and should contain sufficient binder material to
allow utility and foundation trenches to stand. Proposed nonexpansive imported
material should be evaluated by an engineer before being used, and on an intermittent
basis during placement and compaction on the site.
4
Prior to placement of fill, the soil should be scarified approximately 8 inches,
moisture conditioned to a level above optimum moisture content, and compacted to a
minimum of90 percent of maximum dry density.
5
Fill, including nonexpansive import, should be replaced in thin lifts, moisture
conditioned to a level above optimum moisture content, and compacted to a minimum
of 90 percent of maximum dry density. Prior to compaction, the soil should be
cleaned of any rock, debris, and irreducible material larger than 4 inches-in diameter.
6
The upper I foot of subgrade and all aggregate base in areas to be paved should be
compacted to a minimum of95 percent of maximum dry density. Subgrade and
aggregate base should be firm and unyielding when proof rolled with heavy, rubber-
tired grading equipment prior to continuing construction.
I. For conventional foundations follow recommendations as given report.
2. Resistance to lateral loads should be calculated based on a passive equivalent t1uid
pressure of 350 pcf and a friction fàctor of 0.5. Passive and frictional resistance can be
combined in the calculations. These values are based on the assumption that backfill
adjacent to foundations is adequately compacted.
3. Slabs-on-grade and exterior flatwork should have minimum thickness of 4 full inches.
Due to the expansive soil condition, interior slabs should be reinforced with steel as
specified by the architect/engineer. Based on soil expallsion only, slab reinforcement
should consist of#3 rebar spaced at 24 inches on center <~ach way. The reinforcement
6
should be placed at the midpoint of the concrete unless otherwise directed. Use of steel
reinforcement should also be considered for exterior flatwork.
4. Slabs and grade beams should be doweled together as required by the architect/engineer;
based on soil expansion potential only, the dowels should be a minimum of#3 rebar
spaced on 24-inch centers. The dowels should extend to 3 inches from the bottoms of the
grade beams and a minimum of 18 inches into the slab.
5. To help protect interior slabs from damage due to expansive soils, they should underlaid
by a minimum of 8 inches of non expansive material (refer to Site Preparation and
Grading).
6. A minimum of 2 inches of clean sand should be provided as a cushion directly beneath
interior slabs where moisture transmitted from the subgrade would be undesirable.
Clean sand is defined as a coarse grained material (ASTM D 2488-93) of which less than
3 percent passes the #200 sieve. Prior to placement of the clean sand, the soil surface in
the slab area should be at or above optimum moisture content, and no desiccation cracks
should be present.
7. A vapor barrier placed at the midsection of the clean sand is recommended to protect
floor coverings from infiltration of subsurface moisture or to provide protection where
moisture transmitted from the subgrade is undesirable. Care should be taken to properly
lap and seal the barrier, particularly around utilities, and to protect it from damage during
construction. To reduce the potential for moisture in the subslab area, the vapor barrier
should be placed a minimum of I inch above exterior grade.
8. Assuming that minor movement (i.e., l/4-inch or more) of exterior flatwork beyond the
structure, such as sidewalks, patios, stairways, etc., is acceptable, the flatwork should be
designed to be independent of the building foundation. The flatwork should not be
doweled to foundations, and a separator should be placed between the two.
9. To reduce shrinkage cracks in concrete slabs and flatwork, contraction joints can be
installed. Joint spacing should be at the direction of the architect/engineer.
(I) Preliminary Operations
After the cleaning and stripping operation and after the cuts have been completed and
before any fill is placed in any particular area, the existing surface shall be scarified to a
depth of 12 inches and compacted to dry density in excess of 90 percent of the maximum
dry density as obtained by the Modified Compaction Test, ASTM D 1557, designation. It
may be necessary to adjust the moisture content of the subgrade soil by watering or
aeration, to bring the moisture content of the soil to near OMC (optimum moisture
content) in order to obtain the specified density.
7
YAH
=;~::;::::,.~~..
Ii
! I
"
'\,\~
\II~
ì \1..1 ¡ ¡ ..::::
IllBeth v~~lJ !¡ ~
¡~;::::\:,'_.._~, ,-<.
]'1
I'
Munro A.I/e
BORE 2
n
! ~'4e Ii, 1.
-~ ~~~~' tîöõ tÎJ1nO~1
Œl2002 Yahoo! Inc ',:
,',
-,,'1,
1
,- :~:::,:_:\:\- " ...,,! !~mm~'~liH,~~~!!\,t¡'\~:~::::::::::::=::"=::::::::::.
\m m-:::::"" ~- "~,.~,¡ r~'" ..,~ , '."" : I
w:')j\~ I,'
J:: I' I j '. a¡ I, ì,
...... I I ' , ìi,Siln Tomas
:= i i \\9
Oil
..o} ,1
.Q I,
«¡'¡
H
II
~ 2002 Navigation T~s "..I"'~~.:rEç...t:!l
, ,
BORE 1
~
Nchef9~
:--::::::::::_...,_m-
':,\
LOCA TION MAP
1224 ABBOT AVE
CAMPBELL, CA
N.T.S.
f
80RE 1, SW corner of lot
Date of Investigation April 24, 2002
Logged by 1. K. Singh
No ground water encountered
Samples obtained by using 2.25" o.d. hand sampler in accordance with ASTM D 3550-
84 and bulk samples from augur borings.
~
ë.
Q)
0
0
2
811
4
811
6
812
8
10
0
z
Q)
c..
E
(1)
(f)
OJ
.Q
.~
~
c.
~
(')
Q)
c.
~
Q)
c..
E
(1)
(f)
(0
....
Q)
C.
en
~
0
ã5
Description of sample
Sandy silt ML
HS 5
Sandy silt ML
HS 6
Sandy Clay, medium stiff
to stiff moist brown
No sample recovered
same type of soil as above
<0-
(f) Ii)
Oen
(f)~
::::>0
ML
CL
CL
Q)~ë ~
u.a Q) :>.£
..!!1 en ..... ...." OJ
c.'õ ð ~ .¡¡¡
.f:~o~~
18.9%
17.1%
:i-
Ii)
c:
Q)
0
~<o-
o~
114.7
110.5
~
80RE 2, Mid Point of Easterly Fence
Date of Investigation April 24, 2002
Logged by 1. K. Singh
No ground water encountered
Samples obtained by using 2.25" o.d. hand sampler in accordance with ASTM D 3550-
84 and bulk samples from augur borings.
2
4
6
8
.J::.
ã.
<V
0
0
10
0
Z
<V
a..
E
(1)
(J)
821
821
822
OJ
.Q
.~
.J::.
a.
(1)
ð
<V
a.
Þ
<V
a..
E
(1)
(J)
(0
...
<V
a.
rn
3=
0
ã:i
HS 5
HS 5
/
Description of sample
Sandy silt ML
Sandy silt ML
Sandy Clay, medium stiff
to stiff moist brown
No sample recovered CL
same type of soil as above
(J)~
urn
(J)!!1
:JU
ML
CL
<V~"E ~
U.2 <V .,..,1;;
!!1 rn - L. OJ
a.'õ 6 ~ ëD
E:?:U~3=
18.0%
16.0%
¡i.
ëñ
c::
<V
0
~.....
0&
113.7
110.5
JO
COf\HSlc
GRAINED SOII_S
More Il1al1 50% ot
material is 1ili:!J.s¿r
than No. 200
sieve size
FINE-GRAINED
SOILS
Male than :,()% oj
rnalerléJl IS 2UliJ.lli:1
Ihal1 No, 200
sieve size
'---- ----
44acl. )\A~I- Æ.
SOIL CLASSIFICA TION SYSTEM
(Moditied trom U. S. C. 5)
MA/OC! {)fVISI()N~ -- -_J ~~~~;B ~;;~;,~~
-------~- ---
C;HfWU- AND
C;H¡WlèLL Y
oj,)1
r,'I)le Ihal1 'jOë<, at
I <I, iI" t'
'd.J!-'li.:!J UII Nu 4
SAND AND
SANDY SOILS
f/,uw tl1,ur :'0% of
CUdrse traction
Q~g I\JO, 4
sieve
511 1S AND
CLAYS
111(;111_1 UliCiANIC SOII_S
'-"'-".'.' .
"""'. . -.'
.-...-.-.'.. .
""". -"..
"'-". "".
'. . -". '. '.
CLEAN GI=1AVELS
""...-. .'.
'. -"". "'..
"""""" .
.,¡-:,¡-.,¡:,¡~.,¡~~:
..'¡.,.,¡,."¡-,,'¡'-"¡"'¡',,
".".".".".",'-
-"."'."'."'."'.-,'.'"
~./:/.//././:
~-.~'.'--".'-.~-."
GRAVELS WITH
FINES
------ --~
. . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . .
CLEAN SAND
(little or no tines)
. . . . .
. .. '"
. . - . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . .
. " - .
. . . . . .
.'.'.'.'.'.' .
. .. - .
. . . . . . .
LlOUID LIMIT
LESS THAN 50
SAND WITH FINES
(Appreciable
amount of fines)
I I I I I I I
I " I I I I
1----- --------_: : : : : j :
I
I_IOUID LIMIT
C;f=1Ef\lf::RTHAN 50
SW
SP
SM
SC
- ML
CL
OL
MH
CH
OH
-----
P1
TYPICAL DESCRIPTIONS
-----------
GW
Well-graded gravels, gravel-sar1cJ
mlxlures, Illtle or no tines
GP
Poorly-graded gravels, gravel-sand
mixtures, little 01 no flllt's
GM
Silty gravels, gravel-sal1d-silt
mixtures
GC
Clayey gravels, gravel-sancf-clay
mixtures
Well-graded sands, gravelly sal1ds,
little or no fines
Poorly-graded sands, gravelly
sands, little or no fines
Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures
Clayey sands, sand-clay mixtures
Inorganic silts and very fine sands,
rock flour, silty or clayey fine sands
or clayey silts with slight plasticity
Inorganic clays of low to medium
plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy
clays, silty clays, leal1 clays
Organic silts and organic silty clays
of low plasticity
Inorganic silts, micaceous, or
diatomaceous tine sand or silly soils
Inorganic clays of 111g11 plastlcily, fal
clays
Organic clays of medium 10 l1igl1
plasticity, organic silts
--,---._---
I~eat, 11umus, swamp soils willi 111911
0lgal11c contents
, ,~
:....~O'i' CAItt ,ò~
!::::: ~
u ..
. .
-' "-
-5- '-
<" ,-,'
'ORCH"\l.O'
----
CITY OF CAMPBELL
Community Development Department - Current Planning
May 1,2002
Randy and Virginia Milbank
1224 Abbott Avenue
Campbell, CA 95008
RE:
PLN2002-34 - Site and Architectural Review Permit Application
1224 Abbott Avenue
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Milbank:
The Planning Division has reviewed your applications for a Site and Architectural Review Permit for
a new single-family residence at 1224 Abbott A venue. Your application was distributed to the
Building Division, Public Works Department, and County Fire Department. The comments or
preliminary conditions of approval from the Building Division and Public Works Department are
attached. Additional comments or conditions may be forthcoming.
Your application has been deemed incomplete. The following additional information and details are
needed in order to deem your application complete and schedule it for meetings with the Site and
Architectural Review Committee and the Planning Commission.
1. Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan.
2. Preliminary Title Report
3. 15 sets of reduced 11" by 17" fully colored elevations of the street view.
4. Preliminary Landscape Plan - Indicate existing and proposed landscaping. All new residential
development is required to have one tree per each 2,000 square feet of net lot area (existing
mature trees may count towards this requirement). The landscaping plan should show at least
six trees. All landscaping should also comply with Campbell's Water Efficient Landscape
Guidelines (enclosed).
. 5. Development Schedule
6. Site Plan - The following information needs to be included on the site plan:
a. Distance from centerline of adjacent street to property line
b. Indicate all setbacks (including rear yard and second floor)
c. Fencing, indicating existing and proposed fencing. New residential developments are
required to replace fencing along the property lines with a six-foot high "good neighbor"
wood fence at the expense of the applicant, unless it is determined to be in good condition
by the Community Development Director.
Provide outline of buildings on adjacent properties. Describe the height, setbacks and types
of structures.
The northern property line according to the County Assessor's Parcel Map measures
151.12' and the southern property line measures 133.08'. The eastern property line is also
inaccurate. The site plan must reflect the accurate parcel dimensions and provide an
d.
e.
70 North First Street. Campbell, California 95008-1436 . TEL 408.866.:2140 . FAX 408.866.8381 . TOO 408.866.2790
.~!::~?~~.~.~.~.~..::::..! .~.~.~..~~.~?.~~..~Y..:.~~.~...................................................."....................... ................................. ..........................................................~.~.~~..~..?f..?..............................-...
accurate calculation of the lot size.
7. Project Data. The project data should include accurate detailed information about the project,
including the building coverage and Floor Area Ratio. The Building Coverage calculation is
incorrect since it is defined as the percentage of net lot area occupied by buildings. Building
coverage includes the first floor of the primary and all accessory buildings on a lot (measured to
the outside surface of exterior walls) including garages, covered porches and covered decks
(measured to the posts). Building coverage does not include eave overhangs, trellises, or
architectural features (e.g. chimneys, bay windows, etc). The maximum permitted building
coverage is 35%.
The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) is the ratio of gross floor area to the net lot area. Floor area ratio
shall include the floor area of all stories of all buildings and accessory buildings (including
carports) and shall be measured to the outside surface of exterior walls. Floor area ratio does not
include uninhabitable attic space, basements, below-grade parking, unenclosed accessory
structures (e.g. gazebo or trellis), and covered porches. The maximum permitted FAR is 0.45.
It is not clear from the project data summary whether the garage is included in the "proposed
first floor" calculation. Also, the area of the porch must be listed separately and included in the
lot coverage calculation, but not the Floor Area Ratio.
8. Elevations - The following information needs to be included on the elevations:
a. Height of all buildings to plate height of all walls. .
Setbacks
The proposed residence does not appear to meet the required side yard setbacks. The setback
requirement is "at least one side yard shall be the greater of 10' or 60% of the height of the building
wall adjacent to the property line. The other side yard shall be "the greater of 8' or 60% of the height
of the building wall adjacent to the property line." Staff's calculation of the northern wall height is
21', which would require a setback of 12'6" to the second floor. The southern wall height is also 21',
which would also require a setback of 12'6". Wall height is calculated as the vertical distance from
the natural grade adjacent to the building to the top of the plate height for a hipped roof.
Staff recommends that you revise your second story floor plan to step the second floor several feet
back from the first floor on all four sides of the building. This is recommended by the design
guidelines of the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan (ST ANP).
Design
New homes in the San Tomas Area are required to incorporate representative architectural features
of the homes in the area, such as shape, form, roof pitch, and materials. While new development
should have its own design integrity, design elements and materials found historically in the
neighborhood must be incorporated. Staff has determined that your proposed residence requires
some design modifications in order to comply with the design guidelines of the ST ANP.
Scale and Mass
The scale and mass of the proposed residence should minimize the use of design features that
accentuates the size of the residence (e.g. two story vertical elements and unarticulated wall planes)
so that it does not appear significantly larger than the adjacent homes. In order to reduce the
apparent mass of the residence, the plans should be revised to eliminate the use of the protruding
. ~~~~g~.~=.~.~. .::::}.~~.~..~ ~.~? ~~..~~.~.~~.~............ ................................................................ ................................ ................................ .......... ..................~.~.~ ~..~..?L~..... ..................................
hexagonal "tower" element on the rear elevation. This element will look directly into the backyards
of the future homes at the former Rolling Hill Shopping Center and onto Hacienda A venue. It is also
recommended that you consider alternative design features on the rear and side elevations such as
window dormers and changes in wall that minimize the mass, size, and bulk of the house.
The ST ANP states that the design of residences should avoid long un articulated wall and roof planes
especially on two story elevations. The second floor of the proposed residence is not set back from
the first floor on the side and rear elevations. This creates long unarticulated wall planes that make
the house appear massive and boxy which is incompatible with the surrounding neighborhood. It is
recommended that the plans include changes within the wall planes by stepping the second floor of
the rear and side elevations back from the first floor by several feet.
Garage
The ST ANP states that garages should not dominate the front façade. The Plan requires that garages
which dominates the front façade and comprises more than 50% of the linear front elevation must
incorporate design measures to limit the prominence of the garage. These include either recessing
the garage from the front wall of the house a minimum of five feet, providing an entry porch or
trellis that extends the front of the face of the garage, or re-orienting the entry to the garage away
from the street (side-loading).
Privacy Impacts
To minimize privacy impacts on neighboring backyards, staff recommends that the plans eliminate
the second floor balcony or propose measures to reduce potential privacy impacts such as
minimizing the size of the deck and using a solid wall instead of an open railing. The balcony should
be integrated into the mass of the second floor so that it does not protrude from the residence and
enhance the massing.
It is recommended that the plans be revised to show smaller windows and high windowsills
(minimum 60" high) on the second story to help minimize privacy invasion and to prevent looking
directly into a room or private backyard area. The plans should include alternative materials such as
glass block or translucent (frosted) window glass, especially on bathroom windows. The landscaping
plan should also incorporate mature landscape screening for windows that have the potential to
intrude onto other properties.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at (408) 866-2193 or via email at
darcys@cityofcampbell.com
Sincerely,
DMt<ð ~
Darcy Smith
Planner II
encI:
Public Works Department Preliminary Conditions of Approval, 4/16/2002
Building Inspection Division Comments, 4/22/2002
cc:
Geoff Bradley, Senior Planner
CITY OF CAMPBELL
BUILDING INSPECTION DIVISION - COM1v1ENTS TO THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITIEE
DRC
April 22, 2002
1224 Abbott Ave.
Project Application:
PLN-2002-00034
ADDRESS:
RECOMMENDATION:
Note: No building code issue has been reviewed at Development Review Committee; it will be reviewed in the
Building Pemit process. Please be aware that building codes are changing constantly; plans submitted for building
permit shall comply with the code in effect at that time. Submit permit application together with required documents
to the Building Inspection Division to obtain a building permit. No construction can be commenced without an
appropriate building pemit.
It is recommended that this item be forwarded to the Planning Commission for review, with the following conditions.
TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE BUILDING DIVISION MANAGERIBUILDING OFFICIAL:
1
PER..vlITS REQUIRED: A building permit application shall be required for each proposed new
structure. The building permit shall include ElectricallPlumbing/Mechanical fees when such work is
part of the permit.
2.
CONSTRUCTION PLANS: The conditions of Approval shall be stated in full on the cover sheet
of construction plans submitted for building permit.
..,
j
SIZE OF PLAt"iS: The minimum size of construction plans submitted for building permits shall be
24 in. X 36 in.
4
PLA..'i PREPARATION: This project may require a portion of the plans prepared under the
direction and oversight of a California licensed Engineer or Architect. Plans submitted for building
permits shall be "wet stamped" and signed by the qualifying professional person.
5.
SOILS REPORT: Two copies of a current soils report, prepared to the satisfaction of the Building
Official, containing foundation and retaining wall design recommendations shall be submitted with
the building permit application. This report shall be prepared by a licensed engineer specializing in
soils mechanics.
6.
SITE PLAN: Application for building permit shall include a competent site plan that identifies
property and proposed structures with dimensions and elevations as appropriate. Site plan shall
also include site drainage details. .
J:Building ORC Conun~nts\1224abbotUv~.doc
7.
8
9.
II.
FOUNDATION INSPECTIONS: A pad certificate prepared by a licensed ciyil engineer or land
surveyor shall be submitted to the project building inspector upon foundation inspection. This
certificate shall certify compliance with the recommendations as specified in the soils report and the
building pad elevation and on-site retaining wall locations and elevations are prepared
according to approved plans. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed
surveyor or registered civil engineer for the following items:
a. pad elevation
b. finish floor elevation (first floor)
c. foundation corner locations
TITLE 24 ENERGY COìvIPLIANCE: California Title 24 Energy Compliance forms CF-IR and
ìvŒ -I R shall be blue-lined on the construction plans. 8% X II calculations shall be submitted as
well.
SPECIAL INSPECTIONS: When a special inspection is required by u.B.c. Section 1701, the
architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be submitted to the
Building Official for approval prior to issuance of the building permits, in accordance with UB.C
Section 106.3.5. Please obtain City of Campbell, Special Inspection forms ITom the Building
Inspection Division Counter.
10.
The City of Campbell, standard Santa Clara Valley Non-point Source Pollution Control Program
specification sheet shall be part of plan submittal. The specification sheet (size 24" X 36") is
available at the Building Division service counter.
APPROVALS REQUIRED: The project requires the following agency approval prior to issuance
of the building permit:
a.
b
West Valley Sanitation District (378-2407)
Santa Clara County Fire Department (378-40 I 0)
School District:
i) Campbell Union School District (378-3405)
ii) Campbell Union High School District (371-0960)
iii) Moreland School District (379-1370)
iv) Cambrian School District (377-2103)
c.
Note: To Determine your district, contact the offices identified above.
Obtain the School District payment form ITom the City Building Division,
after the Division has approved the building permit application.
d.
Bay Area Air Quality Management District (Demolitions Only)
1: 'Building ORC Comments\ I 224abbottave.doc
MEMORANDUM
TO: Darcy Smith, Project Planner
FROM: LfJLynn Penoyer, Land Development Manager. 1 J
Harold Housley, Land Development Enginee~
CITY OF CAMPBELL
DA TE: 4/16/2002
SUBJECT:
DRC APPLICATION
Site Address: 1224 Abbott Avenue
For File No(s): PLN 2002-00034
Project Description: Construction of a new house
Applicant: Randy Milbank
CO~IENT: Since the owner may be grading within 50 feet of the Santa Clara Valley Water
District's property, it recommended that clearance be obtained from the district.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPART:\tIENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
1.
Proof of Ownership: Prior to issuance of any grading, drainage, or building pennits for the
site, the applicant shall provide a current preliminary title report, grant deed, or other
satisfactory proof of ownership.
2.
Work in the Public Right-of-Way: Prior to doing any work in the public right-of-way, the
applicant shall obtain an encroachment pennit, provide plans, pay fees and deposits, post
security, and provide insurance. The driveway approach in the street shall not exceed 25
feet in width excluding the side flares (tapers).
3.
Ctilities: All new on-site Utilities shall be installed underground per Section 20.36.150 of
the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings or additions. Applicant
shall comply with all plan submittals, permitting, and fee requirements of the serving utility
companies.
4.
Ctilitv Installation Plan: Prior to issuance of building pennits for the site, the applicant
shall submit a Utility Installation Coordination Plan and Schedule for approval by the City
Engineer for installation of street improvements and/or abandonment of all utilities. Streets
which have been resurfaced within the previous 5 years will require boring and jacking for
all new utility installations. Applicant shall also prepare pavement restoration plans for
approval by the City Engineer prior to any utility installation or abandonment.
5.
Stonn Drain Area Fee: Prior to issuance of any grading or building pennits for the site, the
applicant shall pay the required Stonn Drain Area fee which is $2,000 per acre.
Page 1 of 2
Site Address: 1224 Abbott Avenue
For File No(s): PLN 2002-00034
Project Description: Construction of a new house
Applicant: Randy Milbank
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
6.
Storm Water Pollution Prevention Measures: Prior to issuance of any grading or building
permits, the applicant shall comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permitting requirements and the California Storm Water Best
Management Practices handbook prepared by the Storm Water Quality Task Force, Santa
Clara Valley Water District and the City of Campbell Municipal Code regarding Storm
Water Pollution Prevention.
7.
Site Plan: Upon submittal of a formal application, the developer shall provide a complete
and accurate Site Plan in accordance with the Planning Division's checklist.
cc:
Syed Wahidi, PW Inspector
j :\landdev\ 1224abbott
Page 2 of 2
~ . CA A-
~~o - "J1.6ð
!:;: ~
U r-
0 0
... ....
1-", <-~
"OIlCH^",Q"
Development
Application
File No.
M 1ßJ 2 - ceo .3LL
Planning Department
70 North First Street, Campbell. California 95008
(408) 866-2140
APN(S): ¡./o 5. - J S -('J J ()
ZONING: {.2 \ C1
PROPERTY ADDRESS: \;1,)" A,H~ð"""'-
TYPE OF APPLICA TION(S): s;-1< J.. I« II\' .
DATE FILED: o/'~. O~
GENERAL PLAN: AI EW f? ¡:;;( J n£=N{ E
A-uE c.AHPßELL CA qç-oOx-
R'("ìe~ Pe( \14', t
APPLICANT: k R '\- \'1. ~~ h \ L ß A 1\.\ K
ADDRESS: \.;l..l~ ARGO~ Aur-
CITY/STATE: LAM PßE<....L (.. A
TELEPHONE: (-lOP") Ffi(; -Q(,6i>
ZIP: q~oOf
PROPERTY OWNER: .f"\ R +- \'1. ~ <. h \ L ß Pt \.\K.
ADDRESS: ,~~ '4 A. \3 p.. 0'"'\'\ A-\J E=
CITY/STATE: C. It M PRELL ~ A .
TELEPHONE: Í'L)x-) r"t . i¡~6,Ç
ZIP: qC::Oð ~
Attach a separate sheet listing the names and addresses of others you wish to receive copies of staff reports and agendas.
AFFIDA VIT/SIGNATURE(S):
The undersigned person(s), having an interest in the above-described property, hereby make this
application in accordance with the provisions of the Campbell Municipal Code; and, hereby certify
that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my/our knowledge and belief.
"'R,,-^ -~ / hrI.. lL _L . n¿> C' A-'. ft~
Applic ~ Signature Date Pðertý 0 e S Si a e Date
NOTE: Staff is required by State Law to notify applicants of the c~ess of their applications within 30 days.
Only those applications which are found complete will be placed on the Planning Commission Agenda.
OFFICE USE ONLY
Rvsd. 12/20/2000
:<,. ~ . CAttt.
"f:':-~.,ø, ,,' ~~
ù r-
0 0
... ...
~... ".;:
.0~CH"'.5)'
FILE NO.
Site & Architectural Review Permit
Supplemental Application
PURPOSE
The Site and Architectural Review Area is intended to promote
orderly development; to enhance the character, stability, and
integrity of neighborhoods and zoning districts; to secure the
general purpose of the City's Zoning Ordinance and General
Plan, and to assure high quality architectural design and
optimwn site design through the architectUral review process.
PROCESS
Pre-AptJlication Review: It is recommended that the applicant
make an appointment with a planner prior to submitting an
application to discuss the preliminary design of the project.
This will help the applicant detennine if the proposal is
consistent with existing review standards and ordinance
requirements .
Filing of Application: The completed application must be
filed with the Planning Department along with the appropriate
fee and all required data. The staff planner who is on duty
will give the application and data a cursory review for
completeness. The application cannot be accepted if the
submittal is incomplete.
After the project has been assigned to a planner, it will be
reviewed in more detail for completeness. A letter stating if
the application is complete or if additional information is
required will be sent to the applicant within 30 days after
receipt of the application.
Environmental Review: Nearly all Site and Architectural
Review requests are required to have an environmental
assessment to detennine if it will be necessary to prepare an
Environmental Impact Report or a Negative Declaration.
Application Review: The Planning Staff, the Site and
Architectural Review Committee, and the Planning
Commission will consider the following in the review of Site
and Architectural Review applications:
1.
2.
3.
Traffic safety, congestion, and site circulation;
Landscaping; and
Building and site layout.
Staff Review: The Planning Staff will evaluate the request by
conducting an investigation of the site and considering the
proposal in relation to adjoining structures. Staffwill prepare a
Mitten report for the Planning Commission which will analyze
the development proposal and provide staff recommendations.
A copy of this report will be sent to the applicant.
Site and Architectural Review Committee (SARC): Prior to
the Planning Commission meeting your application will be
reviewed by SARC. The Committee reviews the application
for site layout and building design and then forwards a
recommendation to the Planning Commission.
Public Notice: At least 10 days prior to the public hearing,
property owners within 300 feet of the subject property will be
notified by mail of the hearing. In addition, a notice of the
public hearing will be published in the Campbell Express.
Planning Commission Meeting: The Planning Commission is
required to review and approve detailed site, building, and
landscape plans. Staff will present an oral report and
recommendation for the proposed project. This presentation
will be followed by testimony from the applicant and then by
any interested persons who may wish to comment on the
application. The Planning Commission may then close the
public hearing and make a decision approving or conditionally
approving the request, denying the request, or postponing the
decision to a later date. Unless an appeal is filed, the Planning
Commission's decision is final.
City Council: Site and Architectural Review applications are
not required to go before the City Council, unless the Planning
Commission's decision is appealed within ten calendar days.
Project Summary
INFORMATION TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT
No. of Stories:
R\q
R t:- c;. \ \') E ,,'< E-
-> -' . 4~
"2
General Plan Designation: --%J. uð ~~ \/ Â ~\7.A
Existing Use: ç' ~<.. \ ù E. N ( ¡;;.
Floor Area Ratio:- ~~...-e-%
Net Lot Size: J 0 , 1./ <' t.1
.I 251 Landscape Coverage: ç 7.7/.
Zoning:
Proposed Use:
Gross Floor Area:
Lot Coverage:
Surrounding Uses:
North:
~r-<; \ DE- NC E
Rvsd. 1/12/01
Pavement Coverage:
1'8 Ýð '
Pavement Coverage:
South: Cë-aÇ '"0£ NLG=-
East: V '" ( A NT
LoT-
West: R E-<: , f)~ t-..\L ~
Site & Architectural Review
Supplemental Application
Page 2
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
Axe the following items applicable to the project or its effects?
Yes
No
~1.
~
J<3.
/ 4.
~ 5.
16.
3/7.
8.
9.
--+
-4
Change in existing features of any lakes, hills, or substantial alteration of ground
contours.
2. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or
roads.
Change in pattern, scale or character of the general area surrounding the project.
Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity.
Change in lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing
drainage patterns.
Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity.
Proposed development is on a filled site or on a slope of 10 percent or more.
Use of and/or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances,
flammables or explosives.
10. Substantial change in the demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, etc.).
11. Substantial increase in the demand for fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural
gas, etc.).
12. Relationship to larger project or series of projects.
13. Additional traffic generation or parking demand.
Discuss below all of the above items checked yes. (Attach additional sheets as necessary)
14. Describe the project site as it exists, include infonnation on topography, soil stability, plants and
animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site.
15. Describe surrounding properties, including infonnation on plants and animals, and any cl,Iltural, historical
or scenic aspects. Indicate the intensity of land use and the scale of development (height, frontage,
setbacks, etc.)
Rvsd. 1/12/01
f'
: Site & Architectural Review
Attachment A
Page 3
PROJECT SUMMARY
Assessor's Parcel Number:
Lot Size:
JJ...'!Þ::J.~
I- 0.. "s" t1
¿¡O3
jÇ"
- %
Gross sq. ft. (Property to center line of street)
Net sq. ft.
Utilization:
Building Coverage
(include cantilever portions)
Landscape Coverage
Paving Coverage
Floor Area Ratio:
Total building sq. ft.
divided by net lot size
Adjacent Land Uses
North
South
Use
Re 1j-e\l'4~
R-e\ " J ~~....c:. ooG..
CA~ "'~ \
~~àå@~-c..-
East
West
Parking
Standard
TOTAL
3-\',
lp
Compact
Restaurant and Assembly Uses
Seating Count
Residential Projects
Unit Type
Living Area
Garage Area
Total Area
No. of Bedrooms
Number of Units
Sq. ft.
~'1y
". ()~ L't ~
I ~ $' -O.L
~'1, R %
Zoning
~ I'"
.
~ \'\
Percent %
-. -d:1i1'-' d
$1..70/0
\ ~ °/0
.2 7. 7 Ojj
¡;""'"t'~ \-e.-+.
Handicap
A
R. \'\
B
C
o~ . ~JÒ
,..).,..~. ~
!:: ~
u r-
0 0
... .)..
-S;~ ,,!:-
. °I?CH ..."Q.
Attachment C
West Valley Sanitation District 4 Acknowledgment
NOTICE TO APPLICANTS
REGARDING EFFECT OF WASTE WATER
TREATMENT CAPACITY ON LAND
DEVELOPMENT APPROV ALS PURSUANT TO
DEVELOPMENT OF APN: ¿¡tJ ~ . Jf'" - O/{J-
Please take notice that no vested right to a building pennit shall accrue as the result of the granting of
any land development approvals and applications. Pursuant to the adoption of Ordinance 9.045 by West
Valley Sanitation District 4, the agency providing the above described parcel(s) with sewer service, if
the District's Manager and Engineer makes a determination that the issuance of a sewer connection
pennit to a building, or proposed building, on the above described property, will, in his opinio~ cause
the District to exceed its ability to treat adequately the waste water that would result from the issuance
of such connection permit, then said pennit may not be issued, and, hence, no building pennit may be
issued by this agency.
If the sewer connection pennit is issued, it may contain substantive conditions designed to decrease the
waste water associated with any land use approval.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
By signing below, the applicant acknowledges, at the time of application, that he/she fully understands
the above.
J:l~ '-\ A h hØ-\-A- Aue.
Address of Proposed Development
CD..~ 'n.-. \ \
eCL
Ct 500 ~
/}? ~ -W ßJ1. :~. <;< if. QIZ::.
Applicant's S attire Date
Distribution
Original to:
West Valley Sanitation, District No.4
100 East Sunnyoaks Avenue
Campbell, CA 95008
Copies to:
File
Applicant
Rvsd. 12/20/2000
.'
Attachment D
Contribution Disclosure Form
Page 2
TO BWED OUT BY APPLICANT
I. IF CONTRIBUTIONS TOTALING $250 HAVE NOT BEEN MADE, CHECK HERE, AND SIGN
BELOW IN SECTION m. JI C-
II. TO BE COMPLETED ONLY IF CONTRIBUTIONS TOTALING $250 OR MORE HAVE BEEN MADE.
ADDRESS:
--------
----
...--------- ...---
----"
,/"
,----
----
NAME:
ZIP:
TELEPHONE NO:
,,'
LIST COMMISSION MEMBER(S) TO WHOM YOU AND/OR YOUR AGENT MADE CAMPAIGN
CONTRIBUTIONS TOTALING $250 OR MORE, AND THE DATES OF THOSE CONTRIBUTIONS.
NAME:
DATE (S):
AMOUNT (S):
--------
-"-
--------
(if Oth~
/------
CONTRIBUTOR:
NAME:
--------'
,~
~er than yourself)
///
.//
CONTRIBUTOR:
DATE (S):
AMOUNT (S):
NAME:
CONTRIBUTOR:
DATE (S):
AMOUNT (S):
'--...---
m. SIGNATURE
. ~~~ .-- '-----DA'ffi,-"f' t"' L '" -
Rvsd. 1/12/01
ôtt . C~A
~~~
!::: ~
u r
0 0
Å ~
1- ....
~ ,-'
.OIlCHA\\.Q'
Attachment E
Hazardous Waste & Substance Sites Disclosure Form
This form must be completed by development applicants per the provisions of Government Code
Section 65962.5.
As part of the development application process, you must complete this disclosure form, certifying that
you have reviewed the current CAL-EP A Department of Toxic Substances Control Facility Inventory
Data Base Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List (available at the Planning Department, City of
Campbell) and indicate below whether your project site is included on this list.
Project Site Address:
\c:L.2 '-\
A-~~O\T
AUE
{' Å t-'\ D ßPI ~
(A q rQoe-
Proposed Project:
J\) E~
R-E-Ç,JOJ3Né £. .
0 Yes, the above-referenced site is included on the CAL-EPA Department of Toxic Substances
Control Facility Inventory Data Base Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List.
cJ<5 No, the above-referenced site is not included on the CAL-EPA Department of Toxic Substances
r Control Facility Inventory Data Base Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. "
Applicant Signature 'K,.., ~c~ ~~ ' Date
'l' ~'o-2-
Please provide this completed form to the City of Campbell, Planning Department, 70 N. First Street,
Campbell, CA 95008, together with the application for development.
Rvsd. 12/20/2000
~
To:
City Clerk
Please collect and receipt
For the following monies.
Planning File No: ~O¿ - 00(>.$ 4-
Address; 122 ,:f\ Å-vr" -
ITEM
AMOUNT
I.
Major.
A. 5+ acres -
6,045.00
6,045.00
6.045.00
6,045.00
General Plan Amendment
Zone Change
Planned Development Permit
EIR Review
B.
1-5 acres-
General Plan Amendment
Zone Change
Planned Development Permit
EIR Review
5,030.00
5,030.00
5.030.00
5,030.00
c.
0-1 acre
General Plan Amendment
Zone Change
Planned Development Permit
EIR Review
3,650.00
3,650.00
3,650.00
3,650.00
2
Minor:
A. Subdivision Map (5+ lots)
Site and Architectural 10,000+ square feel
Tenlative Parcel Map (4<lots)
3,650.00
2,440.00
2,440.00
B. Site and Architectural 0-10,000 square feel
Variance (non-residential)
Text Amendments
- Use Permit
1,760.00
1,760.00
1,760.00
1,760.00
3.
Miscellaneous
A. Variance (residenlial)
Modificalions of Approval
Moditication PO Permil
Remstalements
Revised Devèlopment Schedule
Extensions of Time
1,100.00
1,100.00
1,100.00
1,100.00
1,10000
1,100.00
B.
Site and Archilectural (residentiaVeach house)
Minor Modifications to Side Yard Setback (residential)
Signs (each sign)
Sign Program
Fence Excepl1on
Promotional Events
Appeals
136.00
136.00
136.00
520.00
135.00
136.00
100.00
4.
Other:
Maps (Black &White)
Maps (Color) If Available
General Plan Text (Unlil 2001 Updale Adopled)
General Plan Text (After 2001 Up dale Adopted) ,
CopIes (per page)
Refundable Deposit - Account 2203
Fire Department Review - Account 01.303.4241
. Architectural Approval
. Project Plan Review
. Subdivision
Park Impact Fee - Accounl 295.535.4920
Tree Replacement In-Lieu Fees - Account 101.701.4971
58.25
174.75
$116.75+$10 per 101
Amount Varies
Amount Varies
10.00
70.00
19.00
45.00
1.00 1"pgJ.IOppadd'l
Amount Varies
l-b(ç.oo
58. ¿s-
For City Clerk Only:
Receipt No.:
Amount Paid:
Received by:
Dale:
Exceptlon for Major Projects: It is an;icipated that the apPlicati;CJ11tC_Sr OfflÇ~ajor projecls will sIgnificantly
exceed the above fees. [n these cases, the Community Developmenl Director may collect a deposit and charge actual time to
process the applical1ons based upon current hourly rates.
RECEIVED.
~ 2002
Note: Adopted on 5/1/01 by Campbell City Council Resolulion No. 9851, effeclive 7/1/0 I.
~rù.ec,l<t-n~_t;Oft 0 f J1."'~' TrlLf /L'!.J'
p.-<:";;¡;;~"~Íi-';9t:i~:='21,i.7.Z;t~~-'¡.., taA¥.:l 7 ~é~a.
CERT/nCATE OF ENGINf:t:R
I, Edward 5 5lafford. hêrr:by certify lhall am a Reg/slerodCtvll éng/neer
ollhc: 5tate 01' Call1arnia, /hO/ thIs map cons/sting of one sheel rorreclly re'
presents a survey mode ~r my superVISIon in rebruary. 1948; thaI Ihe sur'
vey ,~ true and complele os .shown; thaI all of the rnonvmenls srluwn lherr:'
on,cons/~h"ng oi Iron pIPe actually exlsl and theIr posl!lons are corre:clly
shown and thaI XJld rn~nls ore suif/Clent t(1 enable the survey to òe
rr: t roc /XI E «..u. " .-;l JJ. ~
Regls/ereel Civil Engine 'No 6
I
i
N
I
-...p ,
H",,--
Lme 8"'- --
1:%-:' f'~ - --
LANDS
OF
CéRTlrlCATé OF OWNER,
We ht:reOy cert/fy that we ore Ihe owne~ oi or hove .5Orne Tlghl. Itlle or
Interest in and 10 /he IT!XJI prc:I I:)erly included wilhin /h(: suMivis/on ~hown wr
on 111/'s n?Op. and ItJaI we ore Iht: only ~r$on~ whose consent is necessary
10 po:J.5 a cltXlr /¡fle 10.5/0id properly. and ~ consenllo lhe rnolong and re .
cordirK] oi.5Oid I1?Op and .subdivision CI:5 shown wIthIn the tJorder lines. and
hereby dt::cf;caro A? public U3e oIllI?e streets shown on soid mop within sold
:Jubd/vi~;on .
rJ(B~~~
-'- 8,.001<5 Wollon
3::
...
<r
:"I~
z
ARCHER
/3J.~ÚJ . !d~
Blanche W Wallon
~
'-lin
-,~
;...
2
2
"!
SAN JO~ INSuRANCE CO - TRUSTEE
~ B ~~---~4_7
ðy - ~I n y ry
f.
5TA TE OF CALlI'"ORNIA
COUNTY Or 5ANTA CLARA '3.5,
On fhi3zz..D(Joyof~¡ç~ belore me rl/4 v//r,wrLL,oNolary PublIC
in and ror the County 01" Son/lOCkJro, Stole orCol/rornia. resIding fhere/n. duly
CDmn?issioned ana sworn, ~/"3()nallu appeo;rxl5. Brooks Wallon and ðlonChe
W. WOlton, hl.s wile. known 10 I1?tf 10 Þe the pt:~s whose name.5 are 5ubscnòed
10 the within ;n$lrulT](:nt. and oclmowleOgt:d 10 IT](: thot /ney aecuk"d Ifle .5ame,
IN WI TNé55 WItEREOr: I how: hereunlo .set my h<Jnd and aÎ/iited my of.
i/cial St!Ollhe day ana year in Ihis ~/IIiCulc lirst abovc written
ßA515 Or ßEARI/V6S Non
The bearing of Ihe westen,! Imt' aI' ,.015 .J t' ~ oF l/"it' Lovell Tracl as .shown
or rnap en/I/fed -Record of Surveý of' a porhort 01" Ihe Teague ( ,q"" prop.::u'ý-"
as recorded In Book 16 ot-Maps. ~c I. SantGOan:; County Rer;ord5, was
loken 05 basIs 01' bearings _~hown an Ih;s map
All dislonces and a/me 7510ns are $how" Ú? f=/ and dcc,rnols Ihereof'
The blue txJrder /n<1/c-olcs ItJe !Jounclones oF lhe lond subdivKkd by Ih/s ff'Op
JAr "iron p/pe:;cl 0/ all 101 corners one ¡ndicvled /nus,'- 0
.'
'f -: .
, if
~
~ H-n YJ" ; Piö ~ If! .R
Notary Public In and r the Counly of
..5onlo Claro. State orColiiorma
.
,
5TATE OF CAUrORNIA
COUNTY OF5ANTA CLARA-~
On thi~~y aF.'~,v ~ belòre rnr::rv4 ,W/7r.h-'//< a Nalary PublIc
in and ror /he county 01' .5onIo Cloro. SlrJle al'Col/lörma, rr:5idlng thereIn, duly
commiss/one:a and sworn, personally oppeora:l L, P cdwo/¡}s and C J Clark
known IrJ me to be !he Presidr:nt and ~relary rre5pechvely 01"117<: 5onJæ;e
Ab.sfruct Ie Title In.5L.'rOnce COol IIle cvrporollon lhol execulw the
within in.strurnent 05 Ir~t::, and known 10 rr.e fa òe tne person.s who e-<ecul
ed the SOn?<: upon õeholl"oI" the Corporalion rt(}rnecl I~erein, and acJrnowleOg
eel b IT](: that 5UCh corporolion executed the .sumt: os trustee
IN WITNE5S WHëREOr. I hove hen:unlo.5e1 my hanc1anr.. off/,lced my
oiilc/al .:>eollf7t:: doy and year ir' ¡"?l.5 cerl/Îtcale r,r:>! aÞo~ "",-,llen
--r1u- n.LhL~
Nctory Puóf¡c in ana' for ~ Counly of
5anloClora. StoIc ofCa/¡furnia
Ct:.Rr/nCATL Or CLLRI< or BOARD 01' SUPERVISORS
1115 orrKr<:d lnol mop of Trocl No 479 be and Ihe SOffIC /5 herreby Opp7:Wed.
",V' ,'¡,'.' .,!rff'!S, lone5, ollcy:> rood" onct ""he,- porcel", of land shewn upcr. sold
rnep and there'r:' ol"t'ered rar c/ceÙco!io,' lx'. and 11'.,.. 50".,e orcJ¥/iI.. hereby
Ck.:L 0'1-'1=' for /he pu'-poses ror wh,ch Ih~' ,'.om,,' ore cfiered /ò,-d!:dICO/ian,
The CIerI<. of Ihls Beard ,,~ dlra '~'d Ic cndar5e upon llit: race Df sold ",op a
(CD'! ,j /1'.15 CrrK:r aulhenlicokd by !lie 5eal ot' /he ßovn:f cÎ 5vpervisor.s
I rc'rcOIj (crllrylhal the fc-njoll7<) crcfo.'r Wa5 aclcplcd òy 1f7e ßoord of 5"
JX'rv/,'cr,~ ;;1 u mee/":/1 of sod 8ou'll h- 'Id ~a...:..194ð
Alber: J Nc.vl,;', Cc~ é!(:rk -:' EJl OIIiClo Cle.'k 01
TtJ<>8C<lL'T.) ~vl.5ors.50nIrJCbrowunt'/wfl
Ç,-
~y
"
jìblbi
CERTlr-¡CATé 01 COUNTY Rl:COROER
AccC.olCd for recorc1 ond rec:oroed ,,' ðook /8 oF II4ops, Page Lt. In !lie 01"-
flce of' theCounty Rec'orderd /fie Counl'l of Santo Claro th/s...!..Z.ckJy ol"......!"Io l'
194-8 a I..!!:..?" ~ M
Chos A J-'ayne, Courtly Recorder of' IT1t: Coun/y of
~Y.,fb Claro, Slale 01" Cah,ornia
r --:(
ð --....-/ 't... 1-...-0.--<- 7-
y, Depuly
.j
-' . .
, -c,
CERTlf'/CATé Or-COUNTY SUH'ItLYOR
I herr:by cerlllj¡ lhol / hove e>'.un?,,;ed /r,: I,nol n70p "ì 71Vf..f ,Vr, .179 , thai
Iht: 5ubd/v¡~/on as ~hown #>erron 15 :x,b5IU/l/IO: 'il II'" ,<0""'" CI~, ,'ClPPCOrt"d on
>}t: fenfbl/VI!!: n?Op !hereof and on'l apprDvecf olfera/lc,~", :/,otoll ,""e P/ov/slons
0/ /h<! Ml:7p, 'cl and of any IOCQlorod70nce u.op¡'cabk- ul tN' 1,17.'10' (}rlfK: opprvvoi
01" /he len/alive nxlp nove ~'n cyrpllCeJ wI/h. one' lrot.' am 5;;;/."'" "c/ 1170' 5O,d
mop 15 /t:chn,colly carrec'
F<OlXr' Ö ChonJier .';oun!'f jurveyor
5onta Cloro Coun!t¡, Wllforn,a
i"~
tL~ ß./ oe>..Ir'..,
rTLrz¿£L.. rJ Depul,/
- --..
.\ '-', ""':'6;;1. ,"~ "å,
"'~IQ
6
,ti
6
N.
~
LAND~
- ,
:=:.,.-: 0 F',\,
1.01 4 lDvd':TI!{,Y,
'Wooo:.'r '
, ...~,
LANDS
OF
WALTON
N,ðZ".'S'f,
'--'-,
6
3
~II&J~
~I ~ , :::)-
;; o!"~z:
on.. on
m;t C;lLJ-
m:;¡\!:>
<X ¡<X
N.aZ"IS'I!.
¡;¡:¡
5
N,el.'S'I.
iüõi
4
5.82""-
, 4.25'
'.,
,-.r-
--
16,..'
...
LANDS
OF
WERTH
..
2
.
..
- SMtIH ~
_-9)5,.T!<!.t_~' ,'--
, '.... ,'"
"
"!!I
O'-J
~~
~~
~
,,} 'f~
¡ . \oj
f-~'~
. , ," ,("f;';~
-:i,~~<
,,', ,J
TR T NO 479 -Ii)?
A C . ~+.j?~î:
ALLEN DALE TRAG"f>~¡::"
BEING A PORTION OF THE '~,; ~Ú
RINCONADA DE LOS GAT OS , ".
SANTA CLARA COUNTY. CALIFORNIA
SCALE ,"= 50. FEBRUA RY1 1948
L, CEDRIC MACABEE
CIVIL ENGINEER
SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA
5-3640
t
~ ;~
~ ,'.:~1I":;
~.,.(,C
.",'::-,;
NEW NESIDE~CE
OWNER:
MR. AND MRS. MILBANK
ADDRESS:
1224 ABBon AVENUE
CAMPBELL, CA 95008
SCOPE OF WORK
DEMOLISED EXl&TNi 61RJCT\.RAL AIÐ E!UIL T
tØl11It) 6TCR& &NiLE FAMILY ~
PROJECT DATA
PARCEl. NO.
ZONING
LOT AREA
EXISTING FIRST FLOOR
EXISTING GARAGE
EXISTING LMNG SPACE & GARAGE
403.15.010
R19
10,454
1,442
384
1,826
GENERAL NOTES
=: R~': IK) ~=~ CØItr~~.~'rr:'~
Ufetg ~FreCaI4Icn, or th8 ~u.. or tak8I at s:. proJect llta.
2. m¡ctcrt to 18II1II8 filII =a1l1W. 11'1'8118Y8d~ I'8VI8I or =II.~L
and ~or Þ8'IodIc IItTøn ~ CØI!6 ~1øII, fQl' ~I .ltII'h
f6 i::ßi8r Icn6 to CDIII'InI8c:I ' CCIIT8IIt8d Þn Iø.
::f'b.t-. Vkûl ::$:.;-- or... or œ5for ~~ ~ and
CØll6tNctlœ t8ctn ( 8XCIIvat 6CI;;Õ1dh:..~
8'8C\1ørI. f~~ for Icn or~ vlrl trl::'~ f~
c:øw:IItlcn It th8 j'øbïft&
3. V..latlcn In the field cøndltlcn6 I'8IIUYII to the CCII'Itrlct ~ ehlil be
~ to the DeaIc:rl8' or 08n8r. IIbic. ehll1 not ~. LilUI .r1U8l
Þ*"IMIcIn rrc. the ~te- or 081.- II ClbtaIn8cl.
4. Th8 Inf'ClrllatIœ CCII'ItaIn8d.~ h œl.1nc:I6 16 In It68If Jnc:c þlete and void III"
~ -'.Rh~-=~~~~~or~.Jror
Cërtiñ"i1~1Q8--rëëJ98 or bcJ Itgvng tIw contract:
fór ~'I rev=. c:h:*'J:.W ~Ndr~~~~Wn'1 ~,:,,~.:re œly
~~~ ~ tlcra.iiji'"iiãíf*J-.r,~ the :1g8' or, Q88' .'M
b'ë ¡¡;;.'d :ït'18 JEb Ilta
6. ~.. øtIw1Il6ell08d. III d8t.a1~:r::' and nøI86 011 tIw cr.. are Int8ndec:I
to b8 ty:)lc:al fOl' ""'lar l'tult1øn6
~ """'"iiJ:';, .., ... .. ~ =-~ J"" -'!'J8"'" ..
ær:r~= :: 1F~ In 1llta'la~ r
I:ant.... ~.p.c.fkIi:J or povId8d. 9 II Y:"w t8n~...
1IIITantg.
&. Contractor ehllI rer;rad8, ÞII.tdland III~II CØll6tnlctlOll dIIIIg86 to lite. goa..,
CØICI'8t8, fencing. 8tc:; to IittdI _ltInS Itlcn.
9. Good ~!i1lct1c:86 thlil be ~ ~ÜII8t cU CØII'I8 of'
Th8 or IIId IllWllII 011 tIw lrete 81 lor Itre8tI
~~I III I ~ ~It II ~ 1tI InåIIrge or
CØll6truc:t1c:Jn at tIw iØbii~ c:irtng all ~ .
~actor lhllIln6tall .. V8It cb:t6 ~ 8111 to eM61ct8 regilta' .Rh
~~C:~f=I~IIIf'~ ~~~~~~
~'~\"J,"='=r--:r~
~r å:æ"IJ"Ca~~~ ~Tc: IIt8I11d
13. All CI~ In 01' ....., 24' or doc:n, owr 9 IQUIN 1:-. and 111Ü*118' or fb: r,
and ali911Z11g In ~ and batH&ä to be ufM9 9l1li:.
14. ~,~ rei..,. valV86 for IIIt8r h81t8' to t8nnlnlte QUteId8 th8 bulldtng
.1th:xÄ ~ trapþ8d.
&. f'rovId8 IfIP8" 8Id IoIIIr COIIbu6tlcn air fOl' fI.rnIc8 IIId IIIter h81ta' CClllpllllllnl
~I ~c186 In gara98 to be ...... 18' abcw8 fin"" fb: r and GFI
n. f'rovId8 all p"'tng wnt6 to b8 .In.... Iff ft'ØII Oþ8I'lble 1kyItg'U.
I&. f'rovId8 ØII8 tør ccntnlctlon for cIoeetI atorag. IIIdIr ata.....
19. F\'øvId8 I'Ir8pIlc8 h8Ir\ nøor ft'.~ to be ~I&
~r=..8ItdI at 11I8IItr1nC86 to kItchn IIId battrøøIna to be to T-24
2L LIdU In c:Iøøtt ~ follø8h::t cJe8o111C8 to ~d*l1h8IY86:
Å Maø.~ fIxtIna"1hlll hlV8 12' c:I8IrlllC8 and hlV8 an
~ I'bd&r8I and r.- ffl8d to hlV8 .... 6' c:I8IrlllC8.
SO. FT.
so. FT.
SO. FT.
so. FT.
PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR
PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR
TOTAL LMNG SPACE
PORCH
NEW GARAGE . 3 CAR
TOTALLMNGS~CE+~GE
LOT COVERAGE
FAR
2010 SO. FT.
1,922 SO. FT.
3,932 SO. FT.
256 SO. FT.
710 SO. FT.
4,642 SO. FT.
29%
44%
INDEX
ARCHITECTURAL
----
,-",,- --.-.
A.O1 COVER SHEET, Sm: PLAN AND VICINITY MAP
A.O2 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN
A.03 PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN
A.04 PROPOSED FRONT AND REAR ELEVATIONS
A.O4a PROPOSED COLORED FRONT ELEVATION
A.05 PROPOSED SIDE ELEVATIONS
\JI:~l' -.-
L1ge [)
lie GO! Ave
ð.::
.x "
~ þ
" D
Æ -
¡¡. Sn,o~ C,-
~ .. J'" ..J!!!!!'
,,:1: ........
~ ,,(!) ~ HazQMcxx Av<o i:
.. ~ ~ It 1Ir
¡#'VIJ'Ø<;ß ~ ~, j fialal Ava ¡
~ ¡ ~ ~ J A..., War
Q" '
~ "d ~ ----5g- '
~". ~ JQ~t1a<1C\~~ \.",d~Dr
~ ~ ' ,,0
g '2 ,,<: -, 'Jj~~ ",,0 '<-
\r>-<"" ,.,-'}g.' "
wost1l'D". "vðC\ ",! &uetç11am Ave
-AOI' \)' >JII""'- '2 ~ ... '
\.<J'v' \(\$ ~I"f,e. oS
?o.,QG\ ~ * ~ ~
~\,,~ do., ,"", e " ~ <-san Tomas ~ ~ ~
V" #,e<I. '~ 8 (D" <J
.,.. <:")) .a [' ffScallCt
fj % -¡. ~ £' - F shðTb.G!
Q'l. !}. --,
'i; ~ 1; )dcltFISehtr f
. <;¡ ~ pork ¡¿ œ 0
'" ii, ,ð' .i( go
~ -l't'.~ ", ~ 3 l'
,,(,.' ~~ 11< ,1, Ç) -<
. '..~ "~'~,~Q' .~', ,,¿> W,Pa¡rAYe J
(\- ~ "W( c:},,~ '
'" ~ ", ~ ,,~
~ ' ! "-0 '~~
'" ~'",:,
~ 4 " Knowl"" Dr
r- - U
ø VICINITY ~
N
0
~
I .
I .
I !
' / I I I J
I
I i
I ! ~ I'
ILDI'E ) I
I
I :"5jl ¡
I
I
I
ILDI'E) I -I
I
I
I ,
I
I. PUtf
I
!
!I :I~
~
R. & MRS. MILBANK
PHONE: 408-866-4668
IFAX: 408.378-2405
L0c:.4TICN
1224 ABBOTT AVE.
FAMPBElL, CA 95008
~I~
~
'- I
~itq)'8Q
t
~
..
.
I
~
OM: 118
. 1'1'. £ A
-~Uo ----- '
1
I
I
J
.
I88IE ~ DATE
JœNO R-2CØl-&'
CLIENT AI"f"IIIOVAL.
MSD
MONO SPACE DESIGNS
1220 SOUTH SECOND STREET
SAN JOSE. CALIFORNIA 95112
408/227-7778 FAX 408/293-2143
Emell: hubert@monodeelgns.com
DATEs ~
DA11!. 12 -Ø'1. 2ØeII
ec:.AL8o A6~
DJUIIN, .... VARDA
c:I-I!aœD.
. , - 8I-EET TITLEo
--.-1. -. _.~._._. _.-.-.- A::::,::::,:N AU: -. -.-. - .-. _.~.__. -.-. = :~E~I=~ MAP
PLAY
81IIU:IIR!
!:
'I~
3
""'"
-
8
I
'%
.
!:
,
.
N' ....
12'.;
---
12'.'
Iii:"
~
~Q
I
In
i
ff ~
f .
II
T œ-
..,.
ø SITE & ROOF p~S
NO
AO1
~ 1\\
Q I
Ii
I I
~ z
I ~ d
! I Ii
~
£I ~ %
I
~ ~ ûl
Q Q
en !:IE
C~m~~!
;I!;:I!iGl~
WIñ:!j :
Ooz '0
Wza: 0
1ft o~~c
VI~ ~~~,
(l)5~~!
~OOf.O,:.!
..::~ iii!
Ii) N
a: 0
~~ .(
~D.
~ ~~ ~
I Œ~ I
~
~:g¡
::!~N
~cØcØ
.IØ""
(I) CD (II)
a:8~
~.;¡:
. Iii
z
a:~~
o.u.;
.8
~ ~m
y 00«(
§ 6~
..J m..J
~w
.f
N
N
...
!
æ
~
I- I ~ ~ ~ I I ~il Iltl ;II! II~IIII
Ji ~i ~.I i !.I~ ~i ,II e 11111 db !Ih =. ~ ~ ;Idlh
I t II- ie la 1= e~ I II ¡' III II ¡Uli ali' el ¡ s ;1 luUl t
~ 111111 h Ii :11; III1 d un Ii bill Iii! It n II II !lim~1
i
II
~
Z Î II,
~ ::
I: è 8
II
II
II
,e-,'.
-,
.UlII-,.
,U"I.
.Z:",.
.",1
."IU
.11-oZ:,ø-, .UI .-,.
-"."~
I
I,
II
r--J
(
I
I
.9-,ra
A.
11:-
8-
...
II.
~
II:
¡¡;
Q
w
fD
i
0
Œ
!;:
.,
ia
",." ..'
'/""'-¡-"<
>/ "
; ':,,' t.'",'
a , \ /'"
\ ,,'
j' /~'
»r,- ~.
" ,
i';'
~
!;:
.,
.
@s
...
..
i';'
å
IUI '"IL
~
ill
!;:
.
;-
~
;-
~
.
Ii)
I
.
~
~
.
~
:~
~
;-
þ(J=:@
..
~
.
.U-"
.U-,.
.ØI-,I
.9-,1
.r,U
.9-,1 ,ø-,
,ø-,tIP
~
jllO
...I ¡
- N
::E ' .
. i ~
CDCDC')
a:!tD
::E.¡
II1 IÜ
z
. 0 :K
a::E:~
ILl&;
æ
s
g
'\'
.
g
'\'
.
I)
,
it
; .
~ g
'\'
I'-
š:
õ
.
š:
...
I
.
g
r;
;-
CD
.8
% ~I
~ 'Co(
5 6~
9 m..l
~w
.~
~~
I
I
I
~
z IIII
\.') I I
II è ~
II
II
II
G
I
"",1
!
~ Ii
Q !
I I
2 Z
I ~ d
I ' I ~
~
,
£t ~ %
II
~ ~ Û
D
tJ) ~E
C!a;~~
¡ !;:lJ1'I ~
WIii:S!:
oQZ¡~
cn~8~~il5
c(w-u.;
Q,lI)ðCD
tJ)~IIÏ~!
::E°O!':I
Z 11).., t¡ ~
~ ~!il
If I a ~ I jl 1112 ;!¡! 10111
.. ~i ~ ~I ¡ !~ I fill I ,td¡ I ¡ii lilt. i ~ till-Ie
d) ~ ~, ~ !J~ ~ I.. . H I~.. I~ ~ . lei ~11ii
I t II! ii ,æ 1= ~: I iz ¡f III II ¡Uli ~Ii' al ¡ I ¡I hull t
~ 111111 U II ~I U Ii II d 1111 ulmdul!1 n II U !lim~1
.C/\ "-,.
.LO,I
.e-,M
- --. -- ~ - - .
.;-.L
i J
[
I
I
~I
I
¡
I
I
I I
II
Î ¡
I
I
. ---]
I
I
~ :
I
I
rn
i
I
I
ì
.C/\ '-."
.L-,e
.C/\ .-..
.t-,'
...., .9-..
.",11
Q
Z
0
0
w
ß~
. (1)11-
~ Oa: ti
to- 0.0 %
i Œ~ I
(W)
0
.c
õ
i»
~
..
~B
a:
~
Q
Z
0
()
w
CD
Q
w
i
0
a:
D.
"
"'
š:
,
r-
š:
?
I'-
"
"'
0CItt"I0II11CN
~
61\ICCIO f'III8I-
..... ~
NL t
8I'UT Mœ
ÞP'O8D &Tae
~J~
~
ill
;
/
~
i'---
~
~
.
-~
;
.I~
------
,
-
...11AX.1l
œtI"D8ITICN
RCICII' 11.81
... ~ fIlA,.
8I\ICICIO .....
..,... TOfO fllAte -,
I
è
'1
;
.
\.....
--
--
-----,
-,-,-~ - -of
¡Tn
~-'
--
~-~ //
"":"'," ':"~::e-:; =-'~'-o ""[1] :';;0:0>-:' :';:;~,>" :,;""-~"'rn;"~-~:"'> >~::\,,"Ò"..>
"""',"":,""":-""",, ';,;, ':<, '7',=r;";"">""":<";"'_Y¡"":"'>;":"~111 I IllY
~~1; ~~ ~~~;~~,~,~,:;:~ ~';; J~ ~" ~ ;i~: ~ ~~,.¿"¿ ",'C",£ >:00:(,:.
I II I I " 'Z~:
N1Jf'4iÇ~t\~~ ~~'~:{~;~i'i~~~1i:i;;,~:'&':~~'i;;t't ~
, ", .. 1224
.' '> "'411 I
Šf~~;~~
"-'-~
a-
oK:""'....
-
-
-,
9.
':
"
"
"
..
-
c
¡::::=
"
a
° [::7'"
~
¡
~
a
~
----.
,-
r-
-,
¡,..
IR
I
Ii
,,( In ~ ~
0 FRONT ELEVATION ~ST)
~
If]
~
r--
-'
D
0,
;¡t
~
,
D
:-1°
/
~
-
Ji¡W
IT
~
~
......
,.--
---
t~~;;~~~~.i~~;~i~:;i~t*:~:~;;tt~it~;£:~;~~~~',i~~i~~\~¡ .:~:(~,{ ffi!~J~i~;<:l~:;~2~;iJ;~]~[f{Ii: ~~~t~~11 Wi*~: - ~
~;"~;,,,::,;:-'<~:,<,;,;;,,:,..,{ ;';:-",,~:-> ;<.:::~~~;.->;~: ~.~. '-5~~~;'."_." ',,- "'.. ""~ ,.~,:",",-,-,.....'" ..,.." ":':'V ",,:"," ~
:'-;T<:"~-:;:."'~'7~;';::>f~, .,.~~~.~~-:,--: ,:~:~~~~ y:~~; ,~.#.?¿~~~~i~;~F:~£¿4i ::Þ~~:t: :~]~~:~~; ~
0 REAR ELEVATION (~
'.
--
/-
-
--'-
---' 1/- - --
~
--
---,
------
-~--",
,
-
/ -
~-
"
/--
--
-
;
;'.
ÕI\
--
i,
¡:
~ CI!DNt
CiCI'I"IO8ITICI RCICII'
TUI
8IUCCO
~
;
iao
...
-
; 1- 1 - IV. If. IlI'I!HCI!
.
;
ì
"
_.-
~IV
--
R. & MRS. MILBANK
PHONE: 408-866-4668
IFAX: 408-378-2405
LOCATION
1224 ABBOTT AVE.
PBELL, CA 95008
TANT
IeetE IIIECQIÐ DAte
JœNO R-2CtØI-&'
CLIENT ~AL
MSD
MONO SPACE DESIGNS
1220 SOUTH SECOND STREET
SAN .JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95112
4081227-7778 FAX 4081293-2143
Emell: hubert@monode8Ign8.com
DA1Es N!VI8Ia6
DA'Æs 12-øt-2ØØI
ec:.ALe. A6~
DIItAILNs M.VAllÐA
c:HI!C:IC2J).
8HæT TIT1..Es
FRONT AND REAR
ELEVATIONS
8J.&T NO.
A.O4
~
--- ' -------
t
--'-
// ---...
( f_-
'1' /
r X
" /"
-) ~f
'(/ \
1 ",\"','",r'í",-,','",',,',',,/,,(,\
l .>
"~ \\ 1/
, \,1 J It, '
-- <' ¡ 1/ I )
~-L (
n
/"- "A, I
"j J I
\ '
,.
\
)
\
'-
./'
/'
-
//
(/
Y
'- ~
"--1, .r
,/' r,
, \
\. \/,1,'-'"/(,, '..
\, t' ) )
1\\ f
I ìI '
I /!, ,
Ii /
I' ,
~_I
/1
/~{ I
1'" I '
, !
\
(
:í
/1
'(
/I
\
'I
f
,/'~!
\ \
!" ¡
I ( (
r",L-L ,-'"
,-'I
'-...,
0 FRONT ELEVATION ~ with fInishes
-
\
I
I
X
;i
\
,-
.~
~
R. & MRS. MILBANK
'HONE: 408 888 .868
U: 4O8-378-24Oö
LOCATIØI
1224 ABBO1T AVE.
IPBELL, CA 85008
.. I8C::CIN) DAT8
JœNO 1IIt-2fIØI-&'
CLIINT AI"f8IIIIOVAL
MSD
MONO SPACE DESIGNS
1220 SOUTH SECOND STREET
SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95112
408/2Z1-7778 FAX 408/293.2143
Emsll: hubert@monodeelgn8.corn
DA'tEJ ~
DA1Es 12-ø1-2ØIÐI
8CALI!s A6 8IoIOUN
DIUIINo . , V.w:>A
øeoœth
8IoEET TITLe.
FRONT AND REAR
ELEVATIONS
...., NO.
A. 04a
~
~I ~
~ ~
,.
CICt'PœmCIN
~TL8
'R p t"Lo41E
ßICICØ I'NIII
'R p I"LA~
£I
~
)}
\)
,
/
----.
::!(5:'f~~~t~tl~~~;;;t~~~-~t'j~til~'1l~~~~~~~t~'
0 SIDE ELEVATION (NO~)
,--,
l,-----,I
~
/~1U!II-
6111CC'O I'NIII
1'\11'I¡k~tl'I~1,~!i1IiI11~iif~i~~\'if~~
"
, ,," ;',C,'""""""""",,-,",,;-;,,, ",'.,- ;'n " '"" ;"'c 0 :!~":.:";",;,:" ,.,.;...,.,~;.<::,.; 0 '~:~:n~'.:"_.,. ",.,,-.-:.<~~ .:::1;;';';;' /
[DI11ICÌiII\~~~!tJltL;~~~I~ rl~~~'
0 SIDE ELEVATION (SO~)
---
I..
R. & MRS. MILBANK
PHONE: 408-866-4688
FAX: 408-378-2405
LOCATIGIN
1224 ABBOTT AVE.
CAMPBELL, CA 95008
/"
(
['- I
18eI.I! ~ DAn:
JOe NO R-2etJ1-&'
CLœN1' ~AL
MSD
n:.I'I.A1I
~I ~
~
"'1G O I'U1IJ I ,.
/
nn
n.
n'-
~
)}
MONO SPACE DESIGNS
1220 SOUTH SECOND STREET
SAN .JOSE, CALIFOANlA8S112
4081227-7778 FAX 4081283-2143
Erne": hubert@monod_lgna.com
PA1Es MvteION&o
PA'Æs 12-I11-2ØeI
ec:.ALes A6 8f.aN
PIIfAILNo W. VAlllPA
aa;I(I!p.
8IoEET TITl.E.
SIDE ELEVATIONS
8HI!ET NO.
A.O5