Modification to UP - 2004April 16, 2004
Jim Sullivan
Braddock & Logan
4155 Blackhawk Plaza
Danville, CA 94506
Re:
PLN2004-30 - Modification to Site and Architectural Review Permit
1457 Hacienda Avenue
Dear Applicant:
Please be advised that the Planning Commission, at its meeting of April 13, 2004,
adopted Resolution No. 3555 approving a Modification (PLN2004-30) to a previously
approved Site and Architectural Review Permit (PLN2002-95) to allow a change in the
approved model for Lot 23 at the Chamberlin Estates Development on the above-
referenced property.
This action is effective in ten calendar days, unless appealed in writing to the City Clerk
by 5 p.m. on Friday, April 23, 2004. California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6,
governs the time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (408) 866-2140.
Geoff I. Bradley
Senior Planner
cc:
Lynn Penoyer, Public Works
Frank Mills, Building
Chris Veargason, County Fire
70 North First Street. Campbell, California 95008-1436 . TEL 408.866.2140 . FAX 408.871.5140 . TO\) 408.866.2790
RESOLUTION NO. 3555
BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF CAMPBELL APPROVING A MODIFICATION (PLN2004-30)
TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL
REVIEW PERMIT (PLN2002-95) TO ALLOW A CHANGE IN THE
APPROVED MODEL FOR LOT 23 AT THE CHAMBERLIN ESTATES
DEVELOPMENT ON PROPERTY OWNED BY BRADDOCK & LOGAN
SERVICES INC. LOCATED AT 1457 HACIENDA AVENUE IN AN R-
1-9 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT.
APPLICATION OF MR. JIM SULLIVAN, ON BEHALF OF BRADDOCK
& LOGAN SERVICES INC. FILE NO. PLN2004-30.
After notification and public hearing, as specified by law, and after presentation by the
Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed.
After due consideration of all evidence presented, the Planning Commission did find as follows
with respect to application PLN2004-30:
1. The proposed residential project is consistent with the R-1-9 (Single-Family Residential,
9,000 square foot minimum lot size) Zoning District, as required per the Zoning Ordinance
and the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan.
2. The density of the proposed project site is 3.4 units per gross acre, which is consistent with
the General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential (less than 4.5 units per
gross acre).
3. The Plan 2B will be located next to a Plan 1B to the east and a Plan 1A across Chamberlin
Court to the west.
4. The subject property is surrounded on all sides by single-family residences.
5. The proposed residence will provide three covered and two uncovered parking spaces, which
exceeds the City's parking requirement of two parking spaces per unit, one of which must be
covered.
6. The new plan configuration will continue to provide variation within the development and a
desirable streetscape.
7. The completed proj ect would consist of a 4,110 square foot residence with a building
coverage of 27% and a floor area ratio of 0.42.
8. A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for the Rolling Hills Single-Family
Residential Project concluding that there are no significant unmitigated impacts associated
with this project, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Planning Commission Reso.- .wn No. 3555
PLN2004-30 - 1457 Hacienda Avenue - Minor Modification
Page 2
Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further finds and concludes
that:
1. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
2. The proposed project is consistent with the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan.
3. The proposed project, as conditioned, will aid in the harmonious developrnent of the
immediate area.
4. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fees imposed upon the project and
the type of development project.
5. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the conditions of
approval and the impacts of the project.
6. The project is not located in a particularly sensitive environment; and no substantial evidence
has been presented to suggest that there is a possibility that significant environmental impacts
would result from the project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission approves a Minor
Modification (PLN2004-30) to a previously approved Site and Architectural Review Permit
(PLN2002-95) to allow a change in the approved model for Lot 23 at the Chamberlin Estates
development on property owned by Braddock & Logan Services Inc. located at 1457 Hacienda
Avenue, subject to the following conditions:
Where approval by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, Public Works
Director, City Attorney or Fire Department is required, that review shall be for compliance with
all applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines, ordinances, laws and
regulations and accepted engineering practices for the item under review. Additionally, the
applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or
Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this development
and are not herein specified.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Planning Division:
1. Approved Project: Approval is granted for a Modification (PLN2004-30) to a previously
approved Site and Architectural Review Permit (PLN2002-95) to allow a change in the
approved model for Lot 23 at the Chamberlin Estates development located at 1457 W.
Hacienda Avenue. The building design and site design shall substantially conform to the
project exhibits listed below, except as may be modified by the conditions of approval
herein:
Planning Commission Reso...lon No. 3555
PLN2004-30 - 1457 Hacienda Avenue - Minor Modification
Page 3
a. Project plans prepared by Braddock & Logan Services Inc., including a tract map, site
plan, floor plans, elevations and streetscape stamped as received by the Planning
Division on March 12,2004.
2. Previous Conditions: All conditions of approval of the previously approved Site and
Architectural Review Permit (PLN2002-95) as approved by City Council Resolution No.
10118 shall remain in effect.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of April, 2004, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
Commissioners:
Alderete, Doorley, Francois, Gibbons, Hernandez, Rocha
and Roseberry
None
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
APPROVED:
George Doorley, Chair
ATTEST:
Sharon Fierro, Secretary
,.\..~. o<f. . CA-11A<9
!::: ~
U r-
0 0
... .>..
'$-", c..::
'Ol/CHA"Q'
ITEM NO.4
CITY OF CAMPBELL' PLANNING COMMISSION
Staff Report. April 13, 2004
PLN2004-30
Sullivan, J.
Public Hearing to consider the application of Mr. Jim Sullivan, on behalf of
Braddock & Logan Services, Inc., for a Modification (PLN2004-30) to a
previously approved Site and Architectural Review Permit (PLN2002-95) to
allow a change in the approved model for Lot 23 at the Chamberlin Estates
development on property owned by Braddock & Logan Services, Inc. located
at 1457 W. Hacienda Avenue in an R-I-9 (Single-Family Residential)
Zoning District.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission take the following action:
1. Adopt a Resolution, incorporating the attached findings, approving a Modification (PLN2004-
30) to a previously approved Site and Architectural Review Permit (PLN2002-95) to allow a
change in the approved model for Lot 23 at the Chamberlin Estates development, subject to the
attached conditions of approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City conducted an Initial
Study for the Rolling Hills Single-Family Residential Project. The results of the Initial Study
determined that no significant impacts would be created as a result of this project. Based upon the
information provided in the environmental assessment, the City Council previously adopted a
Mitigated Negative Declaration for the development project. There have been no significant
changes to the project or the environment that would warrant further environmental analysis.
PROJECT DATA
Cate2orv
Net Lot Area:
Density:
Proposed
9,361 sq. ft.
3.4 units per gross acre
Required/Allowed
9,000 sq. ft.
Less than 4.5 units per gross acre
Proposed Residence:
First Floor:
Second Floor:
Garage:
Covered Porch:
Total:
1,629 sq. ft.
1,604 sq. ft.
675 sq. ft.
202 sq. ft.
4,110 sq ft.
N/A
N/A
200 sq. ft.
N/A
N/A
Floor Area Ratio (FAR):
Building Coverage:
3,908 sq. ft. (0.42)
2,506 sq. ft. (27%)
4,212 sq. it. maximum (0.45)
3,276 sq. ft. maximum (35%)
Parking Provided:
3 covered, 2 uncovered
1 covered, 1 uncovered
Staff Report - Planning Comml.,sion Meeting of April 13, 2004
PLN2004-30 - 1457 W. Hacienda Avenue
Page 2 of 4
Cate2orv
Building Height:
Proposed
27 ft.
Required/Allowed
28 ft. maximum
Surrounding Uses:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Single-Family Residence
Single-Family Residence
Single-Family Residence
Single-Family Residence
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
DISCUSSION
Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is requesting approval of a Modification (PLN2004-30) to a
previously approved Site and Architectural Review Permit (PLN2002-95) to allow a change in the
approved plan number for Lot 23 at the Chamberlin Estates development from a Plan 3C to a Plan
2B.
Property Description: The project site is currently being used as a parking lot for the model homes.
All the paving and parking lot amenities will be removed for the construction of a residence.
The subject property is located on the northeast corner of West Hacienda Avenue and Chamberlin
Court. The property is surrounded on all sides by single-family residences.
Background: The original Site and Architectural Review Permit approved a total of 30 homes with
eight (8) Plan #1 's, ten (10) Plan #2's and twelve (12) Plan #3's. Each plan number had three
model variations on the plans (e.g. #IA, #lB, #IC).
The conditions of approval for the Site and Architectural Review Permit specified that the approved
distribution of these model variations (i.e. #1A, #IB, #1 C) on the particular lots may be revised,
subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director. However, any revision of
the total number of each Plan (i.e. #1, #2, #3) must be reviewed and approved by the Planning
Commission. Since the applicant is requesting a change in the total distribution of plan numbers the
project is being brought back to the Planning Commission for review and consideration.
The table below demonstrates the existing and proposed plan number distributions:
XIS 1ß2; ropose
Plan # 1 8 Plan #1 8
Plan #2 10 Plan #2 11
Plan #3 12 Plan #3 11
EOf
P
d
ANALYSIS
General Plan Designation: The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Low
Density Residential (less than 4.5 units per gross acre). The proposed residential use and density of
3.4 units per gross acre is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation.
Staff Report - Planning Comml»sion Meeting of April 13, 2004
PLN2004-30 - 1457 W. Hacienda Avenue
Page 3 of 4
The project is consistent with the following General Plan Strategies:
Strategy LUT-5.2a: Neighborhood Compatibility: Promote new residential
development and substantial additions that are designed to maintain and support the
existing character and development pattern of the surrounding neighborhood,
especially in historic neighborhoods and neighborhoods with consistent design
characteristics.
Strategy LUT - 7 .2n: Consistency With Plans: Ensure that new development and
substantial remodeling projects are consistent with Specific Plans, Area Plans, City
Standard Details and adopted Streetscape Standards to create a cohesive design.
San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan: The project site is located in the San Tomas Neighborhood
and is subject to the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan (STANP). Staff finds that the proposed
project is consistent with the development standards and design guidelines of the STANP.
Zoning Designation: The zoning designation for the project site is R-1-9 (Single-Family
Residential, 9,000 square foot minimum lot size). The proposed project is consistent with this
zoning designation and meets the minimum setbacks, height restriction, building coverage, floor
area ratio and parking requirement of the R-I-9 Zoning District.
Site Layout and Architecture: Plan 2B is a four bedroom design with simple hipped, shed and
gabled roof forms. A large porch extends from the front of the house on the first floor and a small
balcony extends off of the second floor on the front elevation. A single-story, two-car garage is
recessed 26 feet from the front porch building line and an optional third garage space or office is
located on the front elevation of the residence. The front door and garage door face West Hacienda
Avenue. The third optional garage door is located on the eastern side elevation to reduce its
visibility from the street. Stone veneer, decorative porch columns and divided windows accentuate
the traditional design.
The ST ANP requires that exterior elevations vary within a development project to promote variety
within projects. This is accomplished by not locating two identical elevations next to eachother or
directly across the street from one another. The proposed Plan 2B would be located next to a Plan
1B to the east and a Plan IA across Chamberlin Court to the west.
Staff is supportive of the proposed modification in plan numbers and has found that the proposed
plan configuration will continue to provide variation within the development and a desirable
streetscape.
Parking: The Campbell Parking and Loading Ordinance requires two parking spaces per unit, one
of which must be covered. The proposed residence exceeds this requirement by providing three
covered and two uncovered parking spaces.
Site and Architectural Review Committee: The Site and Architectural Review Committee reviewed
this application at its meeting of March 23,2004 and was supportive of the applicant's proposal.
Staff Report - Planning Comm."sion Meeting of April 13, 2004
PLN2004-30 -1457 W. Hacienda Avenue
Attachments:
1. Findings for Approval of File No. PLN2004-30
2. Conditions of Approval for File No. PLN2004-30
3. City Council Resolution No. 10118
4. Applicant's Letter
5. Exhibits (Tract Map, Site Plan, Floor Plans, Elevations and Streetscape)
6. Location Map
Prepared by: ~ LAl i ~
Stephanie Willsey, Planner I
Approved by: .da1A:rn ' ~
Sharon Fierro, Community Development Director
Page 4 of 4
Attachment # 1
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF FILE NO. PLN2004-30
SITE ADDRESS:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
1457 Hacienda Ave.
Jim Sullivan on behalf of Braddock & Logan Services, Inc.
April 13,2004
Findings for approval of a Modification (PLN2004-30) to a previously approved Site and
Architectural Review Permit (PLN2002-95) to allow a change in the approved model for Lot 23
at the Chamberlin Estates development at 1457 W. Hacienda Ave.
The Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to File No. PLN2004-30:
1. The proposed residential project is consistent with the R-1-9 (Single-Family Residential,
9,000 square foot minimum lot size) Zoning District, as required per the Zoning Ordinance
and the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan.
2. The density of the proposed project site is 3.4 units per gross acre, which is consistent with
the General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential (less than 4.5 units per
gross acre).
3. The Plan 2B will be located next to a Plan IB to the east and a Plan 1A across Chamberlin
Court to the west.
4. The subject property is surrounded on all sides by single-family residences.
5. The proposed residence will provide three covered and two uncovered parking spaces, which
exceeds the City's parking requirement of two parking spaces per unit, one of which must be
covered.
6. The new plan configuration will continue to provide variation within the development and a
desirable streetscape.
7. The completed project would consist of a 4,110 square foot residence with a building
coverage of27% and a floor area ratio of 0.42.
8. A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for the Rolling Hills Single-Family
Residential Project concluding that there are no significant unmitigated impacts associated
with this project, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further finds and concludes
that:
1. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
2. The proposed project is consistent with the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan.
3. The proposed project, as conditioned, will aid in the harmonious development of the
immediate area.
Attachment # 1
Page 2 of 2
4. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fees imposed upon the project and
the type of development project.
5. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the conditions of
approval and the impacts of the project.
6. The project is not located in a particularly sensitive environment; and no substantial evidence
has been presented to suggest that there is a possibility that significant environmental impacts
would result from the project.
Attachment #2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR FILE NO. PLN2004-30
SITE ADDRESS:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
1457 Hacienda Ave.
Jim Sullivan on behalf of Braddock & Logan Services, Inc.
April 13, 2004
The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that (s)he is required to meet the
following conditions in accordance with the ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of
California. The lead department with which the applicant will work is identified on each
condition where necessary. Where approval by the Director of Community Development, City
Engineer, Public Works Director, City Attorney, or Fire Department is required, that review shall
be for compliance with all applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines,
ordinances, laws and regulations, and accepted engineering practices, for the items under review.
Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that (s)he is required to comply with all applicable
Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this
development and are not herein specified:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Planning Division:
1. Approved Project: Approval is granted for a Modification (PLN2004-30) to a previously
approved Site and Architectural Review Permit (PLN2002-95) to allow a change in the
approved model for Lot 23 at the Chamberlin Estates development located at 1457 W.
Hacienda Avenue. The building design and site design shall substantially conform to the
project exhibits listed below, except as may be modified by the conditions of approval
herein:
a. Project plans prepared by Braddock & Logan Services Inc., including a tract map, site
plan, floor plans, elevations and streetscape stamped as received by the Planning
Division on March 12,2004.
2. Previous Conditions: All conditions of approval of the previously approved Site and
Architectural Review Permit (PLN2002-95) as approved by City Council Resolution No.
10118 shall remain in effect.
Attachment #3
RESOLUTION NO.
10118
BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CAMPBELL APPROVING A SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
PERMIT (PLN2002-95) FO.R THE DEVELOPMENT OF 30 SINGLE-
F AMIL Y RESIDENCES ON PROPERTY OWNED BY U.S. TRUST
COMPANY AS TRUSTEE OF THE VECCHIOLI F AMIL Y TRUST
LOCATED AT 1255-1461 W. HACIENDA AVENUE IN AN R-1-9
(SINGLE F AMIL Y RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT.
APPLICATION OF MR. TIM BRADDOCK, ON BEHALF OF
BRADDOCK & LOGAN SERVICES, INC. FILE NO. PLN2002-95.
After notification and public hearing, as specified by law, and after presentation by the
Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed.
After due consideration of all evidence presented, the City Council did find as follows with
respect to application PLN2002-95:
1. The project site covers a 6.66 net acre area and is located on the northwest corner of West
Hacienda Avenue and South San Tomas Aquino Road in the San Tomas Area Neighborhood.
The project consists of the development of 30 new single-family residential units on 9,000
square feet or greater lots.
2. The proposed residential project is consistent with the proposed R-1-9 (Single-Family
Residential, 9,000 square foot minimum lot size) Zoning District and the San Tomas Area
Neighborhood Plan.
3. The density of the proposed project site is 3.4 units per gross acre, which is consistent with
the General Plan land use designation of Low Density Residential (less than 4.5 units per
gross acre.)
4. The proposed project is well designed and is architecturally compatible with the surrounding
neighborhood.
5. The plot plan proposes the development of 30 single-family residences on individual lots.
Ten residences would front Hacienda Avenue, nineteen would front the new public street,
and one residence would front S. San Tomas Aquino Road. The front yard setbacks to the
residences are at least 20 feet and the setbacks to the garages are at least 25 feet.
6. The proposed residences would range in size from 3,875 to 4,336 square feet. There are three
floor plans (i.e. 1, 2, 3) with three different exterior elevations (i.e. A, B, C) that all include
large front porches and traditional designs.
City Council Resolution
PLN2002-95 - 1255-1461 w. J. J.acienda Avenue - Site and ArchitecturaJ. I<.eview Permit
Page 2
7. The proposed residences include a substantial variety of exterior materials including wood
and shingle siding; gabled, shed and hipped roofs; varied porch detailing; and a variety of
front door and garage door designs. The roof material will be concrete tile in a variety of gray
and brown shades. The proposed stone veneer consists of brick, fieldstone, field ledge, rustic
ledge, and shadow rock. No two identical elevations are adjacent to one another or directly
across the street from one another and no more than 25% of the homes on a block have the
same elevation pursuant to the ST ANP.
8. The project provides at least four parking spaces per unit where two parking spaces are
required.
Based on the foregoing findings of fact, the City Council further finds and concludes that:
1. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
2. The proposed project, as conditioned, will aid in the harmonious development of the
immediate area.
3. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fees imposed upon the project and
the type of development project.
4. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the Conditions of
Approval and the impacts of the project.
5. No substantial evidence has been presented from which a reasonable argument could be
made that shows that the project, as currently presented and subject to the required
Conditions of Approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approves a Site and
Architectural Review Permit (PLN2002-95) to allow the construction of 30 single-family
residences on property owned by U.S. Trust Company as Trustee of the Vecchioli Family Trust
located at 1255-1461 W. Hacienda Avenue, subject to the following conditions:
Where approval by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, Public Works
Director, City Attorney or Fire Department is required, that review shall be for compliance with
all applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines, ordinances, laws and
regulations and accepted engineering practices for the item under review. Additionally, the
applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or
Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this development
and are not herein specified.
City Council Resolution
PLN2002-95 - 1255-1461 vv. Hacienda Avenue - Site and Architec'lulá. .l{eview Permit
Page 3
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Plannin~ Division
I. Approved Project: Approval is granted for a Site and Architectural Review Permit to allow
the development of 30 single-family residences at 1255-1461 W. Hacienda Avenue. The site
plan and architectural plan shall conform to the project exhibits listed below, except as may
be modified by the Conditions of Approval herein:
a. Architectural plans prepared by South Coast Architects and received by the Planning
Division on October 11, 2002.
b. Exterior materials and color samples submitted by South Coast Architects.
c. Plot Plan prepared by MacKay and Somps Civil Engineers, Inc. and received by the
Planning Division on October 11, 2002.
d. Landscape and Fencing Plan prepared by Thomas Bank and Associates and received by
the Planning Division on October 11, 2002.
e. Tentative Subdivision Map prepared by MacKay and Somps Civil Engineers, Inc. and
received by the Planning Division on September 24, 2002.
2. Site and Architectural Review Permit Approval Expiration: Within one year from the date of
approval, a building permit must be obtained and construction completed one year thereafter
or the Site and Architectural Review Permit approval shall be void.
3. Distribution of Units: The Plot Plan shall provide the following number of units per plan:
Plan No. Number of Total Units
1A 3
1B 3
1C 2
2A 4
2B 2
2C 4
3A 4
3B 4
3C 4
The specific distribution of these plans (e.g. #1A, #1B, #1C) on the particular lots may be
revised, subject to review and approval by the Community Development Director. Any
revision of the total number of each Plan (i.e. #1, #2, #3) must be approved by the Planning
Commission.
4. Maintenance of Landscaping Near Pedestrian Accessway: All1andscaping near IO-foot wide
non-vehicular pedestrian accessway between Lots 14 and 15 connecting the cul-de-sac and
South San Tomas Aquino Road shall be maintained in a neat and orderly condition. Any
weeds shall be removed and any diseased or dead lawn, trees, ground cover or shrubbery
shall be removed and replaced. All lawn areas shall be neatly mowed and trees and shrubs
shall be neatly trimmed. Maintenance shall include pruning, mowing, weeding, clearing of
City Council Resolution
PLN2002-95 - 1255-1461 tV. udcienda Avenue - Site and ArchitecLwl'Q. ~{eview Permit
Page 4
debris and trash, fertilizing and regular watering. Any landscaping which is removed or
altered must be immediately replaced with landscaping of like kind and quality unless
otherwise approved by the Community Development Director. Irrigation systems shall be
maintained in sound operating condition with heads periodically cleaned and replaced when
missing to ensure continued regular watering of landscape areas, and health and vitality of
landscape materials. Additional shrubs and trees shall not be planted without approval of a
modification to the landscaping plans by the Community Development Director. A covenant
must be recorded on the property deeds to ensure compliance with this requirement.
5. Fencing Near Pedestrian Accessway: Additional fencing shall not be constructed on the
property lines adjacent to the 10-foot wide non-vehicular pedestrian accessway between Lots
14 and 15 unless approved by the Community Development Director.
6. Fences: Any existing or proposed fencing shall comply with Section 21.59.090 of the
Campbell Municipal Code. A final fencing plan depicting fencing type and height shall be
submitted to the Planning Division, subject to review and approval by the Community
Development Director, prior to issuance of building permits. The fence along Turner Way
and South San Tomas Aquino Road on Lot #] 4 shall consist of a wood fence with stone
veneer pi Jaslcrs.
7. Property Maintenance: The property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash,
debris and weeds until the time that actual construction commences. Any remaining debris
from the demolition of structures shall be removed from the property. The site shall be
secured with fencing that prevents access to the subject site.
8. Parking and Driveways: All parking and driveway areas shall be developed in compliance
with the standards in Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code.
9. Final Subdivision Map: The Site and Architectural Review Permit approval is contingent
upon recordation of the Final Subdivision Map to subdivide the subject property. The Final
Subdivision Map shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits.
10. Landscaping: The applicant shall submit four sets of landscape and irrigation plans to the
Planning Division, including designs for the decorative bollards near the public walkway,
prior to the issuance of building permits, for review and approval by the Community
Development Director. Landscape and irrigation plans shall be consistent with the
Conceptual Landscape Plan already submitted and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping
Standards (WELS). The final landscaping plan shall not show the two-foot wide
decomposed granite pathway meandering in the front yards of parcels parallel to the new
public street.
II. Utility Boxes and Back-Flow Preventers: The applicant shall submit a plan prior to
installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes and San Jose Water Company back-flow
City Council Resolution
PLN2002-95 - 1255-1461 h. Hacienda Avenue - Site and Architectufh. ~<.eview Permit
Page 5
preventers, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if the boxes are above ground)
for approval by the Community Development Director.
12. On-Site Lighting: On-site lighting shall be shielded away from adjacent properties and
directed on site. Light fixtures shall be installed near the pedestrian accessway. The design
and type of lighting fixtures and lighting intensity of any proposed exterior lighting for the
project shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior to
installation of the lighting for compliance with all applicable Conditions of Approval,
ordinances, laws and regulations. Lighting fixtures shall be of a decorative design to be
compatible with the residential development and shall incorporate energy saving features.
13. Street Lights: The design of the proposed street lights on the new public street must be
reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director and the Public Works
Director to ensure a compatible design, pole color, and appropriate lighting intensity. The
applicant shall complete a lighting layout and distribution plan that shows the lighting
intensity.
14. Contractor Contact Information Posting: The project site shall be posted with the name and
contact number of the lead contractor in a location visible from the public street prior to the
issuance of building permits.
15. Plan I on Lot 30: The applicant shall revise the Tentative Subdivision Map and/or the floor
plan of Plan I to allow the development of Plan 1 on Lot 30 without requiring a Variance.
Buildin~ Division
16. Permits Required: A building permit application shall be required for each proposed new
living unit. The building permit shall include Electrical/Plumbing/Mechanical fees when
such work is part of the permit.
17. Construction Plans: Plans shall be required for each permitted structure, specific to the lot
and type of structure being proposed. There shall be a Job copy and Office copy of each
single-family unit plan. The Conditions of Approval shall be stated in full on the cover sheet
of construction plans submitted for building permit.
18. Size of Plans: The minimum size of construction plans submitted for building permits shall
be 24 in. X 36 in.
19. Plan Preparation: This project requires plans prepared under the direction and oversight of a
California licensed Engineer or Architect. Plans submitted for building permits shall be "wet
stamped" and signed by the qualifying professional person.
20. Soils Report: Two copies of a current soils report, prepared to the satisfaction of the
Building Official, containing foundation and retaining wall design recommendations shall be
City Council Resolution
PLN2002-95 - 1255-1461 w. l.ldcienda Avenue - Site and Architeclura. .l,-eview Permit
Page 6
submitted with the building permit application. This report shall be prepared by a licensed
engineer specializing in soils mechanics.
21. Site Plan: Application for building permit shall include a competent site plan that identifies
property and proposed structures with dimensions and elevations as appropriate. Site plan
shall also include site drainage details.
22. Foundation Inspections: A pad certificate prepared by a licensed civil engineer or land
surveyor shall be submitted to the project building inspector upon foundation inspection.
This certificate shall certify compliance with the recommendations as specified in the soils
report and the building pad elevation and on-site retaining wall locations and elevations are
prepared according to approved plans. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and
certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer for the following items:
a. pad elevation
b. finish floor elevation (first floor)
c. foundation corner locations
23. Title 24 Energy Compliance: California Title 24 Energy Compliance forms CF-IR and MF-
1R shall be blue-lined on the construction plans. 8Y2 X 11 calculations shall be submitted as
well.
24. Special Inspections: When a special inspection is required by U.B.C. Section 1701, the
architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be submitted to
the Building Official for approval prior to issuance of the building permits, in accordance
with U.B.C Section 106.3.5. Please obtain City of Campbell, Special Inspection forms from
the Building Inspection Division Counter.
25. Non-Point Source Pollution Control: The City of Campbell standard Santa Clara Valley
Non-point Source Pollution Control Program specification sheet shall be part of plan
submittal. The specification sheet (size 24" X 36") is available at the Building Division
service counter.
26. Grading Permit: A comprehensive grading permit shall be issued for all proposed site
grading of the overall subdivision. Plans prepared by a licensed engineer shall be submitted
and approved prior to any grading work.
27. Construction Noise Mitigation Measures: The following practices should be followed during
all phases of site preparation and construction activities:
a. Construction activities shall be limited to weekdays between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. and
Saturdays between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. No construction shall take place on Sundays
or holidays unless an exception is granted by the Building Official.
b. Truck routes to and from the construction site should be established and submitted to the
City for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. These truck routes
shall avoid access to the project site via residential streets where possible.
City Council Resolution
PLN2002-95 - 1255-1461 W. Hacienda Avenue - Site and Architectural I'Í..eview Permit
Page 7
c. All construction equipment with internal combustion engines used on the project site
shall be properly muffled and maintained in good working condition.
d. Unnecessary idling of internal combustion engines shall be strictly prohibited.
e. All stationary noise-generating construction equipment, such as air compressors and
portable power generators, shall be located as far as possible from noise-sensitive
receptors such as existing residences and businesses.
f. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project site shall be posted with the name
and contact number of the lead contractor in a location visible from the public street so
that the contractor can be made aware of noise complaints.
g. Construction equipment, vehicles, and workers associated with the development of the
project shall not be permitted to park on any residential streets.
28. Short-term Air Quality Mitigation Measures: The following practices should be followed
during all phases of site preparation and construction activities:
a. Use dust-proof chutes for loading construction debris onto trucks.
b. Water or cover stockpiles of debris, soil, and other materials that can be blown by the
wind.
c. Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials or require all trucks to
maintain at least two feet of freeboard.
d. Sweep daily (with water sweepers) all paved access roads, parking areas, and staging
areas at the construction site.
e. Sweep streets daily (with water sweepers) if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent
public streets, as directed by the City Engineer.
f. Enclose, cover, water twice daily or, or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers to exposed
stockpiles (dirt, sand, etc.).
g. Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public
roadways.
29. Design-Specific Geotechnical Analysis: Prior to issuance of building permits for the project,
a design-specific geotechnical analysis shall be prepared by a registered geotechnical
engineer, and all recommendations of the analysis shall be incorporated into the project's
final engineering design to minimize the damage from seismic shaking. The project sponsor
shall use standard engineering techniques and conform to the requirements of the Uniform'
Building Code to reduce the potential for seismic damage and risk to future occupants.
30. Archaeological or Paleontological Resource Discovery: If archaeological or paleontological
resources are encountered during excavation or construction, construction personnel shall be
instructed to immediately suspend all activity in the immediate vicinity of the suspected
resources and the City and a licensed archeologist or paleontologist shall be contacted to
evaluate the situation. A licensed archeologist or paleontologist shall be retained to inspect
the discovery and make any necessary recommendations to evaluate the find under current
CEQA guidelines prior to the submittal of a resource mitigation plan and monitoring
program to the City for review and approval prior to the continuation of anyon-site
construction activity.
City Council Resolution
PLN2002-95 - 1255-1461 w. Hacienda Avenue - Site and Architectural l<.eview Permit
Page 8
31. Human Burial or Skeletal Element Discovery: In the event a human burial or skeletal element
is identified during monitoring, work in that location shall stop immediately until the find can
be properly treated. The City and the Santa Clara County Coroner's office shall be notified.
If deemed prehistoric, the Coroner's office would notify the Native American Heritage
Commission who would identify a "Most Likely Descendant." The archeological consultant
and MLD in conjunction with the project sponsor shall formulate an appropriate treatment
plan for the find, which might include, but not be limited to, respectful scÍentific recording
and removal, being left in place, removal and reburial on site, or elsewhere. Associated grave
goods are to be treated in the same manner.
32. Approvals Required: The project requires the following agency approval prior to issuance of
the building permit:
a. West Valley Sanitation District (378-2407)
b. Santa Clara County Fire Department (378-4010)
c. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (Demolitions Only)
d. School District:
1. Campbell Union School District (378-3405)
11. Campbell Union High School District (371-0960)
lll. Moreland School District (379-1370)
IV. Cambrian School District (377-2103)
Note: To Determine your district, contact the offices identified above. Obtain the School
District payment form from the City Building Division, after the Division has approved the
building permit application.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
33. Final Map: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the project, the applicant
shall submit a final map for review by the City and recordation, upon approval by the City
Council. The current plan check fee is $1,600.00 plus $25 per lot.
34. Preliminary Title Report: Upon submittal of the tentative map, the applicant shall provide a
current Preliminary Title Report.
35. Right-of-Way for Public Street Purposes: Upon recordation of the final map, the applicant
shall cause additional right-of-way to be granted for public street purposes as generally
shown on the approved tentative map, including the 10-foot wide non-vehicular pedestrian
accessway between Lots 14 and 15.
36. Monumentation for Final Map: Prior to recordation of the final map, the applicant shall
provide security for setting all monuments shown on the map.
City Council Resolution
PLN2002-95 - 1255-1461 Vv. üdcienda Avenue - Site and ArchitecluraL J.<.eview Permit
Page 9
37. Street Improvements: Upon recordation of the final map, the applicant shall execute a street
improvement agreement, cause plans for public street improvements to be prepared by a
registered civil engineer, pay various fees and deposits, post security and provide insurance
necessary to obtain an encroachment permit for construction of the standard public street
improvements, as required by the City Engineer. The fee for a non-utility encroachment
permit application is currently $260.00. The plans shall include the following:
Hacienda A venue
a. Removal of the existing curb, gutter, and driveway approach and sidewalk;
b. Construction of new curb, gutter and detached sidewalk;
c. Removal of the existing pavement section to the centerline and construction of new
pavement from the new curb and gutter to the centerline based on an R-Value provided
by a soils engineer and traffic index provided by the City (areas of the existing pavement
section may be retained if testing proves them to be structurally sound to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer);
d. Installation of street trees and irrigation at approximately 40 feet on center;
e. Removal of the existing street lights and related appurtenances, and relocation to the
new parkway behind the curb, including construction of new footings and installation
of new conduits, conductors, and appurtenances.
South San Tomas Aquino Road
a. Removal of the existing curb, gutter, sidewalk, and approaches;
b. Construction of new curb, gutter, and detached sidewalk;
c. Installation of street trees and irrigation at approximately 40 feet on center.
New Public Street
a. Construction of new street improvements, as generally depicted by the typical section
for a 40 foot right-of-way on the approved tentative map;
b. Construction of intersection improvements including a 30 foot curb return and
pedestrian ramps;
c. Installation of decorative street lights.
d. Construction of pedestrian access improvements between Lots 14 and 15, as determined
by the City Engineer.
Hacienda Avenue and South San Tomas Aquino Road
a. Removal, relocation and installation of traffic control devices, including signs and stripes,
as determined by the City;
b. Protection, relocation and installation of utilities, as necessary;
c. Construction and reconstruction of intersection improvements at San Tomas Aquino
Road as a result of realignment of the street centerlines and narrowing of the street
width;
d. Reconstruction of the pedestrian ramp at the intersection, as necessary;
City Council Resolution
PLN2002-95 - 1255-1461 vv. ....dcienda Avenue - Site and Architecturã. ~(eview Permit
Page 10
~. Construction of storm drains, drainage inlets and related appurtenances as determined
by the City Engineer;
f. Installation of ground cover in the parkway;
g. Construction of conforms to existing public and private improvements, as necessary.
38. Street Improvements at 1240 Abbott Avenue: The applicant shall make a good faith effort to
arrange to be paid by the property owners of 1240 Abbott Avenue to construct standard street
improvements on Hacienda A venue and the curb return at Abbott A venue that are required
under a Deferred Street Improvement Agreement that the owners signed in 2001.
39. Turner Way: Subject to receiving permission from the applicable property owners adjacent to
Turner Way, the applicant shall submit off-site private improvement and grading plans,
prepared by a registered civil engineer, for approval by the Community Development
Department prior to recordation of the Final Subdivision Map. The applicant shall work with
the property owners along Turner Way to prepare a schedule for the Turner Way
improvements that will minimize inconvenience to the residents, subject to review and
approval by the Community Development Director, prior to issuance of building permits.
The improvements must be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for
the las.t dwelling unit. The plans shall include the following:
a. Resurfacing and reconstruction of the existing pavement and construction of new
pavement for a 16-foot wide private driveway, as necessary, subject to approval of the
Community Development Department and Public Works Department;
b. Installation and modification of drainage improvements, as necessary;
c. Relocation of the West Valley Sanitation District existing 6-inch sewer main from the
proposed residential lots to Turner Way;
d. Relocation, installation, and removal of private and public utilities, as necessary.
40. Water Meter(s) and Sewer Cleanout(s): Existing and proposed water meter(s) and sewer
cleanout(s) shall be installed on private property behind the public right-of-way line.
41. Soils Report: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, applicant shall
provide a soils report prepared by a registered geotechnical or civil engineer.
42. Utilities: All new on-site utilities shall be installed underground per Section 20.36.150 of the
Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings or additions. Applicant shall
comply with all plan submittals, permitting, and fee requirements of the serving utility
companIes.
43. Utility Coordination Plan: Prior to issuance of building permits for the site, the applicant
shall submit a utility coordination plan and schedule for approval by the City Engineer for
installation of street improvements and/or abandonment of all utilities. Streets which have
been resurfaced within the previous 5 years will require boring and jacking for all new utility
installations. Applicant shall also prepare pavement restoration plans for approval by the
City Engineer prior to any utility installation or abandonment.
City Council Resolution
PLN2002-95 - 1255-1461 ,.. - .cienda Avenue - Site and Architec,- .d. eview Permit
Page 11
44. Grading and Drainage Plan: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site,
the applicant shall conduct hydrology studies based on a 10 year storm frequency, prepare an
engineered grading and drainage plan for approval by the City, and pay fees required to
obtain necessary grading permits. The plans shall comply with the 1998 edition of the
California Building Code including Chapters 10, 11, 18,33, and Appendix Chapter 33.
45. Storm Drain Area Fee: Prior to recordation of the parcel map/final map, the applicant shall
pay the required Storm Drain Area fee which is $2,000.00/acre.
46. Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD): Prior to issuance of any permits for grading,
landscaping, or building, the applicant shall obtain a permit and clearance from the SCVWD.
47. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Measures: Prior to issuance of any grading or building
permits, the applicant shall comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permitting requirements and the California Storm Water Best Management
Practices Handbook prepared by the Storm Water Quality Task Force, Santa Clara Valley
Water District and the City of Campbell Municipal Code regarding storm water pollution
prevention. This includes filing a Notice ofIntent (N.O.I.).
The City will provide the applicant with information to assist in complying with this
condition of approval. The primary objective is to improve the quality and reduce the
quantity of storm water runoff to the Bay.
48. Demolition: Prior to recording of the Final Map the applicant shall obtain a Demolition
Permit to remove the existing nonconforming structure.
49. Vacation of Public Street and Easements: Prior to recordation of the final map, the applicant
shall submit a vacation of excess right-of-way application for approval by the City Engineer.
The current application processing fee is $635.00.
50. Santa Clara Valley Water District Permit: The applicant shall obtain a permit as required
from the Santa Clara Valley Water District for work within the District's easement or within
50 feet of Smith Creek, prior to the issuance of building permits.
COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT
51. Required Fire Flow: The required fire flow for this project is 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual
pressure. The required fire flow is available from area water mains and fire hydrant(s), which
are located at the required spacing.
52. Public Fire Hydrants Required: Provide two (2) new public fire hydrants adjacent to lots
#16/#17 and the comer of lot #22. Consult with the San Jose Water Company. Hydrants shall
have a minimum single flow of 1,000 GPM at 20 psi residual, with spacing not to exceed 500
City Council Resolution
PLN2002-95 - 1255-1461 Vv. Hdcienda Avenue - Site and Architectuia. ~(eview Permit
Page 12
feet. Prior to applying for a building permit, provide civil drawings reflecting all fire hydrants
serving the site. To prevent building permit delays, the applicant shall pay all required fees to
the San Jose Water Company as soon as possible.
53. Fire Hydrant Location Identifier: Prior to project final inspection, the general contractor shall
ensure that an approved ("Blue Dot") fire hydrant location identifier has been placed in the
roadway, as identified by the Fire Department.
54. Timing of Required Water Supply Installations: Installations of required fire services and
fire hydrants shall be tested and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of framing
or delivery of bulk combustible materials. Building permit issuance may be withheld until
required installations are completed, tested, and accepted.
55. Fire Apparatus (Engine) Access Roads Required: Provide access roadways with a paved all
weather surface, a minimum unobstructed width of 20 feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet 6
inches, minimum circulating turning radius of 36 feet outside and 23 feet inside, and a
maximum slope of 15%. Installations shall conform with the Fire Department Standard
Details and Specifications sheet A-I.
56. Timing of Required Roadway Installations: Required access roads, up through first lift of
asphalt, shall be installed and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the start of
construction. Bulk combustible materials shall not be delivered to the site until installation is
complete. During construction, emergency access roads shall be maintained clear and
unimpeded. Note that building permit issuance will be withheld until installations are
complete.
57. Premises Identification: Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing
buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the
property. Numbers shall contrast with their background.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 19th
roll call vote:
day of
November
, 2002, by the following
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Burr, Kennedy, Furtado, Watson
None
Dean
None
ATTEST:
APPROVED: ~vJ;:;:.
Je~etteWatson,Mayor
//
¿~~
I'JC"-,,,,""N'.,rSATI.','
,1"1: FOpë,~("'¡G' "',..", THE ORIGn,',
AI'ID CORRECT CC:P,;,,'
AM FILE IN '[titS ú:r,v....
"'" ()1.£RK. C .
&\;T ST ANNE BYBEE. CITY
0 . pee.u... CI\UFOfINIA. uy Ú~
.0
._~-
Anne Bybee, City Clerk
Attachment #4
Statement of Justification
When we went through the approval process we were required by the
City to essentially pre-plot all of our house plans on the thirty (30) proposed
residential lots. Originally, we had requested to build six (6) Plan #l's, eleven
(11) Plan #2's, and thirteen (13) Plan #3's. Staff's position was that we should
build ten (10) of each plan. The Planning Commission, upon the
recommendation from SARC and the concurrence of myself, agreed to a
minimum of eight (8) Plan ills. I was then asked whether I wished to do eleven
(11) of each Plan #2 and Plan #3, or ten (10) Plan #2's and twelve (12) Plan #3's. I
chose the ten (10) twelve (12) mixture. I mentioned if we had a problem with the
Plan #l's that I would be back seeking some relief.
I am here to actually request a change to my mixture on the Plans #2 and
#3. I wish to delete one Plan #3 on Lot #23 (parking lot) and replace it with a
Plan #2. This would yield an end result of eight (8) Plan #l's, eleven (11) Plan
#2's, and eleven (11) Plan #3's.
The Plan #2 has been our best selling, most sought after plan, and it also
happens to be our smallest plan from a building coverage standpoint.
Additionally, as approved we had the ten (10) houses fronting onto Hacienda
Avenue breakdown as follows: four (4) Plan #l's, two (2) Plan #2's, and four (4)
Plan #3's. With the change requested we would have a much more balanced
street scene of four (4) Plan #l's, three (3) Plan #2's, and three (3) Plan #3's.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
RECWEIVED
¡jAR 1 2 200¿1r
CITY OF CAMPBELL
PLANNING DEpT
or. . CAItj
. P<9
~ ~
- ,...
U r
CAMPBELL
... "-
i- "-
/'. ,->'
°RCHAI'-O'
r--
l- .
CITY OF CAMPBELL
u
Community Development Department
April 2, 2004
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Campbell has set the time of
7:30 p.m., or shortly thereafter, on Tuesday, April 13. 2004 in the City Hall Council Chambers,
70 North First Street, Campbell, California, for a Public Hearing to consider the application of
Mr. Jim Sullivan, on behalf of Braddock & Logan Services Inc., for a Minor Modification
(PLN2004-30) to a previously-approved Site and Architectural Review Permit (PLN2002-95) to
allow a change in the approved model for Lot 23 at the Chamberlin Estates development on
property owned by Braddock & Logan Services Inc. located at 1457 Hacienda Avenue in an R-
1-9 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District. A Negative Declaration was previously adopted
for this project.
Interested persons may appear and be heard at this hearing. Please be advised that if you
challenge the nature of the above project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues
you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing described in this Notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City of Campbell Planning Commission at, or prior to, the
Public Hearing. Questions may be addressed to the Community Development Department at
(408) 866-2140.
Decisions of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council. Appeals must be
submitted to the City Clerk in writing within 10 calendar days of an action by the Commission.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, listening assistive devices are available
for all meetings held in the Council Chambers. If you require accommodation, please contact the
Community Development Department at (408) 866-2140, at least one week in advance of the
meeting.
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF CAMPBELL
SHARON FIERRO
SECRETARY
PLEASE NOTE:
When calling about this Notice,
please refer to File No. PLN2004-30
Address: 1457 Hacienda Avenue
70 North First Street. Camphell, California 95008-1436
lu408.866.2140. fAX408.871.5140. TIJ1J408.866.2790
or. . CAItj
. P<9
t «'
- !'"""
U r
CAMPBELL
.-'. "-
"-". '"::-
°RCHAI'-°'
- --- ---
,-
l-,
'-.....
,
( \
V
CITY OF CAMPBELL
Community Development Department
March 16, 2004
Re:
PLN2004-30 - 1457 Hacienda A venue - Minor Modification
Dear Applicant:
Please be advised that the above-referenced application has been scheduled for the following
meeting:
Site and Architectural Review Committee Meeting
Date: Tuesday, March 23, 2004
Time: 6:50 p.m.
Location: Doetsch Conference Room, City Hall, 70 N. First Street, Campbell
Planning Commission Meeting
Date: Tuesday, April 13, 2004
Time: 7:30 p.m.
Location: City Hall Council Chambers, 70 N. First Street, Campbell
Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at (408) 866-
2140.
Sincerely,
'~~ephakli
Stephanie Willsey
Planner
LC) Ilòt~~~
1,1
cc:
Jim SullivanlBraddock & Logan (Applicants/Property Owners)
4155 Blackhawk Plaza
Danville, CA 94506
70 North First Street
Campbell, California 95008-1436
TEl. 408.866.2140
lAX 408.871.5140 . TO\) 408.866.2790
..I..~O, . CA-11.oò'
!:: ~
u ,..
0 0
-;., t
'O'CH~.Q'"
City of Campbell .. Community Development Department
70 N. First Street, Campbell, CA 95008
MEMO RAND UM
To:
Site and Architectural Review Committee
Date: March 17, 2004
Fl'om:
Stephanie Willsey, Planner I ~
Subject:
1457 Hacienda Ave. - Minor Modification to a Site and Architectural Review Permit
PROPOSAL
The applicant is requesting approval of a Minor Modification (PLN2004-30) to a previously approved
Site and Architectural Review Permit (PLN2002-95) to allow a change in the approved plan number
for Lot 23 from a Plan 3C to Plan 2B at the Chamberlin Estates development.
The Site and Architectural Review Permit approved a total of 30 homes with eight (8) Plan #1 's, ten
(10) Plan #2's and twelve (12) Plan #3's. Each plan number had three model variations on the plans
(e.g. #IA, #lB, #IC).
The conditions of approval for the Site and Architectural Review Permit specified that the specific
distribution of these plans (e.g. #IA, #lB, #lC) on the particular lots may be revised, subject to review
and approval by the Community Development Director. However, any revision of the total number of
each Plan (i.e. #1, #2, #3) must be approved by the Planning Commission. Since the applicant is
requesting a change in the total distribution of plan numbers the project is being brought back to the
Planning Commission for review and consideration.
The table below demonstrates the existing and proposed plan number distributions:
xlstIng ropose
Plan # 1 8 Plan #1 8
Plan #2 10 Plan #2 11
Plan #3 12 Plan #3 11
E"
P
d
ST AFF ANALYSIS
Staff is supportive of the project as proposed. The applicant has submitted a revised site plan and
street elevations that demonstrate that the Plan 2B on Lot 23 will meet all the development standards
(i.e. setbacks, FAR, lot coverage) of the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan as well as relate well to
the approved model numbers that surround the subject property.
Attachments:
Street Elevations
Existing and Proposed Site Plans
Tract Map of Entire Development