Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
95 E. Hamilton Ave
PLEASE KEEP THIS SHEET ON TOP Project Fact Sheet 1. Project Address:95 E. Hamilton Avenue ENC 2017--289 2. APN:279-27-096 Developer: Ground Zero Construction Inc. 3. Owner Name(s):95 Hamilton LLC, a California limited liability company 4. Owner Address: 5. Owner Phone: 6. File No. (Planning): Resolution No. 4354 7. Project Planner: Cindy McCormick 8. Cross Reference File(s): PLN2015-274 9. Condition of Approval: Circle one: City Council Planning Commission Comm Dev. Director Resolution No. 10. Architect: Michael Stanton 11. Architect Address: 12. Architect Phone: 13. Engineer Name:Ali Abiani, MFA Engineers and Associates 14. Engineer Address:370 Grand Park Cir, San Jose CA 95136 15. Engineer Phone: 408-509-3461 aliabiani@sbcglobal.net 16. Surveyor Name: 17. Surveyor Address: 18. Surveyor Phone: 19. Monumentation Security Amount: N/A PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT LAND DEVELOPMtry I Effective July 1,2017 �11 �! / TO: Finance PUBLIC WORKS FILE NO. � 1'F`-- / PROPERTY ADDRESS 9s- 5 t-lanitt t Please collect&receipt for the following monies: `ACCT. I . =ITEM AMOUNT- m LAND`D.EVELOPMENT r " ' � ` ' 4722 Encroachment Permit Application Fee Non-Utility Encroachment Permit Major≥$10,000 $425.00 '"`g'5 Minor Encroachment Permit<$10,000 $240.00 Initial R-1 Permit N/C Subsequent R-1 Permits within Two Year Period $240.00 Inspection Fee Minimum Charge per Location $420.00 Street Tree Planting/Removal N/C 2203 ($500 per Tree Planting Deposit Required) $500.00/tree 2203 Plan Check Deposit 2%of Engineer's Estimate $500.00 min 6O0 Utility and R-1 Permits no deposit required 4722 Grading&Drainage Plan Review Sin le Famil Lot $295.00 Site< 10,000 s.f. $885.00 Site≥10,000 s.f.<0.5 Acre $1,185.00 ///e5- - Site≥0.5 Acre $1,772.00 4722 NPDES Review C3 Requirements For projects not required to submit numeric sizing $175.00 /75- For projects required to submit numeric sizing Impervious Area 10,000 Sq. Ft to 1 Acre $740.00 Impervious Area 1 Acre or more $965.00 4722 For pro'ects sent to Consultant for review Consultant Cost+20% 4722 Additional treatment facilities $315 ea Plan Check& Inspection Fee(Non-Utility) 4722 Engr. Est. <$250,000 14%of Engineer's Estimate 4722 Engr. Est.≥$250,000 and≤$500,000 $35,000.00+8%of Engineers Estimate 4722 Engr. Est. >$500,000 $55,000.00+7%of Engineers Estimate 2203 Emergency Cash Deposit 4%of Engr. Est.*($500 min/$10,000 Max) 2203 Faithful Performance Security(FPS) 100%of ENGR. EST.* 2203 Labor and Materials Security 100%of ENGR. EST.* 4721 Storm Drainage Area Fee Per Acre R-1 $2,120.00 (Multi-Res$2,385.00) All Other$2,650.00 4722 Parcel ap 4 Lots or Less ',4,200.00+ 'r90 lot 4722 Fine ract Map 5 or More Lots '.5,115.00+ ',124 lot 2203 Monumentation Securit 100%of Cit 's Monumentation Estimate 4920 Parkland Dedication Fee 75%/25% Due Upon Cert.of Occupanc 4722 Lot Line Adjustment(Includes Certificate of Compliance) $1,990.00 4722 Vacation of Public Streets&Easements $2,700.00 4722 Certificate of Compliance $1,970.00 4722 Certificate of Correction $590.00 4722 Document Recording Fees $15.00/first page$3 ea.Additional 4722 Private Improvement in Public ROW $100.00 4722 Approved Plan Revision Fee $100/sheet 4722 Appeal Filing Fee $200.00 730.4924 Notice of Improvement Obligation Payment 4722 Assessment Segregation or Reapportionment First Split $940.00 Each Additional Lot $295.00 511.7424 Postage MISCEL`L'ANEOUS �� Other(Please Specify) *Engineer's Estimate shall be as approved by the City Engineer and shall include all items of work. TOTAL $. r 2O NAME OF APPLICANT A L& fik, b l a n d NAME OF PAYOR 6 rts-il;. J L Y'O PHONE y '0 - 5o a -b 6 ADDRESS /0 j 5 . S a IAcx. ('rt,e_2 We_, — 33( 2 ZIP Citl IA R 6 11-4 4 7i FOR RECEIVED BY ITY CLERK � ONLY Date \l(4"i f Receipt#`" h � .°n � I t J:IFORM5\Templatesed,,1l 8ative\Rec ipl Form Lend Development 1]-18 4• CITY OF CANPDELL TODAY'S DATE-; 12/14/17 REGISTER 12/14/17 f,."!, C S ....,.:ENC 1 __. .. REF DEPOSIT - 101 $000,06 CU ST :; -.!-000 TOTAL DUF„ 2,22-5,00 CHECK - v $2,225,00 REF iih{;_ ..t CITY OF CAMPBELL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION Revised 8/15 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Date November 16,2017 For File No(s): SiteAddress: 95 E.Hamilton Avenue ENC. No. Estimated Cost of Improvements $50,000 ITEM UNIT PRICES FOR PROJECT AMOUNT _ NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT <$100K >$100K $AMOUNT I.DEMOLITION/CLEARING 1. CLEARING&GRUBBING 1 LS $2,750.00 $2,000.00 $ 2,750.00 2. SMWCUTP.C.C./A.C.(UPTO6") 110 LF $5.75 $4.25 $ 632.50 3. P.C.C.REMOVAL 550 SF $4.00 $3.00 $ 2,200.00 4. CURB AND GUTTER REMOVAL 110 LF $11.00 $7.00 $ 1,210.00 5. MEDIAN REMOVAL 0 SF $7.00 $5.50 $ - 6. DEMOLISH EXISTING INLET/PLUG RCPS 0 EA $2,250.00 $1,750.00 $ - I I.STORM DRAINAGE 1. 12"R.C.P.(CLASSV) 0 LF $275.00 $225.00 $ - 2. 15"R.C.P.(CLASS III) 0 LF $300.00 $250.00 $ - 3. 18"R.C.P.(CLASS III) 0 LF $325.00 $275.00 $ - 4. 24"R.C.P.(CLASS III) 0 LF $350.00 $300.00 $ - - 5. 30"R.C.P.(CLASS III) 0 LF $400.00 $350.00 $ - 6. T.V.INSPECTION(12") 0 LF $1.60 $1.25 $ - 7. STD.DRAINAGE INLET(C.C.DETAIL 5) 0 EA $3,600.00 $3,000.00 $ - 8. FLAT GRATE INLET(C.C.DETAIL 6) 0 EA $2,125.00 $1,700.00 $ - 9. STD MANHOLE(C.S.J.DETAIL D-11) 0 EA $6,500.00 $5,250.00 $ - 10. STD MANHOLE(C.S.J.DETAIL D-12) 0 EA $8,000.00 $6,500.00 $ - 11. BREAK AND ENTER M.H./D.I. 0 EA $1,300.00 $1,000.00 $ - III.CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS 1. SIDEWALK 770 SF $10.00 $8.00 $ 7,700.00 2. DRIVEWAY APPROACH 160 SF $14.00 $10.00 $ 2,240.00 3. CURB AND GUTTER 110 LF $60.00 $47.00 $ 6,600.00 4. VALLEY GUTTER 0 SF $35.00 $30.00 $ - 5. CURB RAMP 0 EA $4,500.00 $3,500.00 $ - 6. TYPE B-1 CURB 0 LF $50.00 $40.00 $ - 7. TYPE A1-B3 CURB 0 LF $25.00 $20.00 $ - 8. COBBLESTONE MEDIAN SURFACE 0 SF $25.00 $20.00 $ - 9 BUS STRESS PAD 0 EA $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $ - E:\95 Hamilton Engineer Estimate Rev-1 (Rev.03/08) Page 1 of 4 CITY OF CAMPBELL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION Revised 8/15 ENGINEERS ESTIMATE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Date November 16,2017 For File No(s): Site Address: 95 E.Hamilton Avenue ENC. No. Esti mated Cost of Improvements $50,000 ITEM UNIT FRICES FOR PROJECT AMOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT <$100K >$100K $AMOUNT IV.PAVEMENT 1. ASPHALT DIGOUT AND REPLACE 0 CF $6.25 $5.25 $ - 2. PAVEM ENT WEDGE CUT(6') 0 LF $5.50 $3.00 $ - 3. PAVEMENT GRINDING 0 SF $1.10 $0.75 $ - 4. PAVEMENT FABRIC(PETROTECH) 0 SY $2.50 $2.25 $ - 5. ATI IALT CONCRETE(TYPE A) 2 T $225.00 $180.00 $ 450.00 6. AGGREGATE BASE(CLASS 2) 7 T $90.00 $50.00 $ 630.00 7. SLURRY SEAL(TYPE II) 0 SF $0.30 $0.25 $ - 8 AC REMOVAL/OFFHAUL/DISPOSAL 7 CF $15.00 $13.50 $ 105.00 V.TRAFFIC SIGNALS/LIGHTS 1. DETECTOR LOOP(6'ROUND) 0 EA $650.00 $520.00 $ - 2. DETECTOR LOOP(6'x 30') 0 EA $950.00 $750.00 $ - 3. DETECTOR LOOP(6'x 50') 0 EA $1,300.00 $1,025.00 $ - 4. ELECTROLIER 0 EA $10,000.00 $6,000.00 $ - 5. 1 1/2"RIGID CONDUIT 0 LF $13.00 $10.00 $ - 6. 2"RIGID TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONDUIT 0 LF $24.00 $20.00 $ - 7. CONDUCTOR 0 LF $1.05 $0.85 $ - 8. PULL BOX(NO.3 1/2) 0 EA $425.00 $350.00 $ - 9. TRAFFIC SIGNAL PULL BOX(NO.5) 0 EA $580.00 $460.00 $ - 10. PULL ROPE 0 LF $0.60 $0.60 $ - 11. NEW SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION 0 LS $380,000.00 $ - V I.STRIPING AND SIGNS 1. REMOVE PVMT.MARKINGS(PAINT) 0 SF $3.00 $2.65 $ - 2. REMOVE PVMT.MARKINGS(THERMO) 0 SF $4.25 $3.70 $ - 3. REMOVE PVMT STRIPING 0 LF $1.85 $1.50 $ - 4. STRIPING DETAIL 9 0 LF $3.60 $3.00 $ - 5. STRIPING DETAIL 22 0 LF $3.60 $3.00 $ - 6. STRIPING DETAIL 29 0 LF $4.75 $4.00 $ - 7. STRIPING DETAIL 32 0 LF $4.75 $4.00 $ - 8. STRIPING DETAIL37(THERMO) 0 SF $6.00 $5.00 $ - 9. STRIPING DETAIL 38(THERMO) 0 SF $6.00 $5.00 $ - E:\95 Hamilton Engineer Estimate Rev-1(Rev.03/08) Page 2 of 4 CITY OF CAMPBELL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION Revised 8/15 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Date: November 16,2017 For Fi I e No(s): Site Address: 95 E.Hamilton Avenue ENC. No. Estimated Cost of Improvements $50,000 ITEM UNIT PRICES FOR PROJECT AMOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT <$100K >$100K $AMOUNT 10. STRIPING DETAIL 39 0 LF $6.00 $5.00 $ - 11. LIMIT LINE/Bike Lane 110 LF $7.50 $6.00 $ 825.00 12. CROSSWALK,12"WHITE 0 LF $7.50 $6.00 $ - 13. PAVEMENT MARKINGS(PAINT) 0 SF $4.00 $3.25 $ - 14. PAVEMENT MARKINGS(THERMO) 0 SF $8.00 $6.60 $ - 15. PAVEMENT MARKER(NON-REFL.) 0 EA $6.50 $5.20 $ - 16. PAVEMENT MARKER(REFLECTIVE) 0 EA $8.25 $6.95 $ - 17. TYPE K MARKER 0 EA $125.00 $109.50 $ - 18. TYPE N MARKER 0 EA $125.00 $109.50 $ - 19. SALVAGE ROAD SIGN 0 EA $115.00 $99.00 $ - 20. RELOCATE ROAD SIGN(W81 ON NEW POST) 0 EA $145.00 $115.75 $ - 21. INST.RD.SIGN ON EXIST.POLE 0 EA $265.00 $231.55 $ - 22. ROAD SIGN WITH POST 0 EA $400.00 $347.30 $ - 23. INSTALL 1226S SIGN WITH POST 0 EA $400.00 $350.00 $ - 24. STANDARD BARRICADE 0 LF $25.00 $19.50 $ - VII.LANDSCAPING 1. STREET TREE 3 EA $650.00 $500.00 $ 1,950.00 2. STREET TREE(36"BOX) 0 EA $900.00 $750.00 $ - 3. PRUNE TREE ROOTS 0 EA $200.00 $150.00 $ - 4. TREE REMOVAL 1 EA $800.00 $650.00 $ 800.00 5. PLANTINGS 1 LS $1.00 $1.00 $ 1,500.00 6. IRRIGATION 1 LS $1.00 $1.00 $ 2,000.00 E:195 Hamilton Engineer Estimate Rev-1 (Rev.03/08) Page 3 of 4 CITY OF CAMPBELL PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION Revised 8/15 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS Date November 16,2017 For File No(s): Site Address: 95 E.Hamilton Avenue ENC. No. Estimated Cost of Improvements $50,000 ITEM UNIT PRICES FOR PROJECT AMOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT <$100K >$100K $AMOUNT VIII.MISCELLANEOUS 1. PEDESTRIAN BARRIER 0 LF $86.85 $69.45 $ - 2. CHAIN LINK FENCE(6') 110 LF $30.00 $25.00 $ 3,300.00 3. RAISE MISC.BOX TO GRADE 3 EA $600.00 $500.00 $ 1,800.00 4. RAISE MANHOLE TO GRADE 0 EA $850.00 $700.00 $ - 5. INSTALL MONUMENT BOX 0 EA $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $ - 6. MEDIAN BACKFILL 0 CY $26.00 $22.00 $ - SUBTOTAL $ 36,692.50 PREPARED BY: 10%MOBILIZATION,CONSTRUCTION $ 3,669.25 TRAFFIC CONTROL/PHASING, $ 1,000.00 REVIEWED BY: CONSTRUCTION STAKING, $ 1,000.00 CONSTRUCTION TESTING $ 1,000.00 AI-WOVED BY: 10%CONTINGENCY $ 3,669.25 10%SECURITY ENFORCEMENT $3,669.25 TOTAL FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY $ 50,700.25 USE THIS AM OUNT FOR SECURITY 5/(000 E:\95 Hamilton Engineer Estimate Rev-1 (Rev.03/08) Page 4 of 4 Fidelity National® �ee Title Company PRELIMINARY REPORT In response to the application for a policy of title insurance referenced herein, Fidelity National Title Company hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a policy or policies of title insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred to as an exception herein or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions and Stipulations or Conditions of said policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said policy or policies are set forth in Attachment One. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than that set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowner's Policies of Title Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for certain coverages are also set forth in Attachment One. Copies of the policy forms should be read. They are available from the office which issued this report. This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested. The policy(ies) of title insurance to be issued hereunder will be policy(ies) of Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, a Florida corporation. Please read the exceptions shown or referred to herein and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in Attachment One of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be carefully considered. It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of title and may not list all liens, defects and encumbrances affecting title to the land. • Fidelity National Title Insurance Company By: 44.1 President Countersigned By: �� p° Attest: SEAL Authorized Officer or Agent Secretary CLTA Preliminary Report Form-Modified(11.17.06) Printed: 01.04.18 @ 10:09 AM by GS SCA0002402.doc/Updated: 08.31.17 1 CA--SPS-1-17-FSBC-8011700408 Visit Us on our Website: www.fntic.com �>� Fidelity National ee Title Company ISSUING OFFICE: 675 N. First Street,4th Floor,San Jose,CA 95112 FOR SETTLEMENT INQUIRIES, CONTACT: Fidelity National Title Company 6489 Camden Ave, Suite 101 • San Jose, CA 95120 (408)448-1600 • FAX(408)448-0212 Another Prompt Delivery From Fidelity National Title Company Title Department Where Local Experience And Expertise Make A Difference PRELIMINARY REPORT Update A Title Officer: Mitch O'Brien Escrow Officer: Lena Signor Email: mitch.obrien@titlegroup.fntg.com Email: Lena.Signor@fnf.com Title No.: FSBC-8011700408MO Escrow No.: FSBC-8011700408-LS TO: Eagle Home Loans, Inc. 1190 Park Ave. San Jose, CA 95126 Attn: Marjorie Gumabay PROPERTY ADDRESS(ES): 95 E. Hamilton Avenue, Campbell, CA EFFECTIVE DATE: December 27, 2017 at 12:00 AM The form of policy or policies of title insurance contemplated by this report is: CLTA Standard Coverage Policy 1990 (04-08-14) 1. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS: A Fee 2. TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN: 95 Hamilton LLC, a California limited liability company 3. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS REPORT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: SEE EXHIBIT"A"ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF CLTA Preliminary Report Form-Modified(11.17.06) Printed: 01.04.18 10:09 AM by GS SCA0002402.doc/Updated: 08.31.17 2 CA--SPS-1-17-FSBC-8011700408 EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description For APN/Parcel ID(s): 279-27-096 THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CAMPBELL, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 31 &32 AS SHOWN AND DELINEATED ON THAT CERTAIN TRACT MAP ENTITLED"TRACT NO. 390 WINCHESTER VILLA," RECORDED ON MARCH 18, 1947 IN BOOK 12 OF MAPS AT PAGE 55, SANTA CLARA COUNTY RECORDS, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 31 FROM WHICH THE SOUTHWESTERN CORNER THEREOF BEARS SOUTH 00 DEG. 34' 00"WEST 2.00 FEET DISTANT, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE NORTHWESTERN CORNER OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND GRANTED TO THE CITY OF CAMPBELL AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED APRIL 16, 1973 IN BOOK 0329 AT PAGE 396, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY. THENCE FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING ALONG SAID WESTERN BOUNDARY NORTH 00 DEG. 34' 00" EAST 139.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERN CORNER THEREOF; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF SAID LOTS 31 &32 SOUTH 89 DEG. 26' 00" EAST 110.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERN CORNER OF LOT 32; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF LOT 32 SOUTH 00 DEG. 34'00" WEST 139.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERN CORNER OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND GRANTED TO THE CITY OF CAMPBELL AS DESCRIBED ON THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED APRIL 16, 1973 IN BOOK 0329 AT PAGE 412, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF SAID LAST MENTIONED PARCEL AND THE FIRST MENTIONED PARCEL CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF CAMPBELL NORTH 89 DEG. 26' 00"WEST 110.00 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL THAT PORTION AS DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO THE CITY OF CAMPBELL,A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION RECORDED SEPTEMBER 2, 2010 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 20854941, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEING A PORTION OF LOTS 31 &32 AS SHOWN AND DELINEATED ON THAT CERTAIN TRACT MAP ENTITLED, "TRACT NO. 390 WINCHESTER VILLA," RECORDED ON MARCH 18, 1947 IN BOOK 12 OF MAPS AT PAGE 55, SANTA CLARA COUNTY RECORDS, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 31 FROM WHICH THE SOUTHWESTERN CORNER THEREOF BEARS SOUTH 00° 34' 00"WEST 2.00 FEET DISTANT, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE NORTHWESTERN CORNER OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND GRANTED TO THE CITY OF CAMPBELL AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED APRIL 16, 1973 IN BOOK 0329 AT PAGE 396, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY. THENCE FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING ALONG SAID WESTERN BOUNDARY NORTH 00° 34' 00" EAST 7.00 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID LAST MENTIONED BOUNDARY SOUTH 89° 26' 00" EAST 110.00 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 32; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERN BOUNDARY OF LOT 32 SOUTH 00° 34' 00"WEST 7.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERN CORNER OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND GRANTED TO THE CITY OF CAMPBELL AS DESCRIBED ON THAT CERTAIN GRANT DEED RECORDED APRIL 16, 1973 IN BOOK 0329 AT PAGE 412, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY OF SAID LAST MENTIONED PARCEL AND THE FIRST MENTIONED PARCEL CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF CAMPBELL NORTH 89° 26' 00" WEST 110.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CLTA Preliminary Report Form-Modified(11.17.06) Printed: 01.04.18 @ 10:09 AM by GS SCA0002402.doc/Updated: 08.31.17 3 CA—SPS-1-17-FSBC-8011700408 , 1 Title No.: FSBC-8011700408MO Update: A AT THE DATE HEREOF, EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes are as follows: Code Area: 010-025 Tax Identification No.: 279-27-096 Fiscal Year: 2017-2018 1st Installment: $6,085.03 Paid 2nd Installment: $6,085.03 Open Land: $957,888.00 Bill No.: 279-27-096-00 2. Special Tax for Santa Clara County Library District Joint Powers Authority Community Facilities District No. 2005-1, under the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 as disclosed by a Notice of Special Tax Lien Recorded June 24, 2005, Instrument No. 18438576, Official Records, payable in continuing installments collected with the real property taxes. 3. The herein described Land is within the boundaries of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District(s). The annual assessments, if any, are collected with the county property taxes. Failure to pay said taxes prior to the delinquency date may result in the above assessment being removed from the county tax roll and subjected to Accelerated Judicial Bond Foreclosure. Inquiry should be made with said District for possible stripped assessments and prior delinquencies. 4. Prior to close of escrow, please contact the Tax Collector's Office to confirm all amounts owing, including current fiscal year taxes, supplemental taxes, escaped assessments and any delinquencies. 5. The lien of supplemental or escaped assessments of property taxes, if any, made pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 75) or Part 2, Chapter 3, Articles 3 and 4, respectively, of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California as a result of the transfer of title to the vestee named in Schedule A or as a result of changes in ownership or new construction occurring prior to Date of Policy. 6. Easement(s)for the purpose(s)shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Santa Clara Valley Water Company, a corporation Purpose: A permanent right of way for the purpose of constructing and maintaining a six foot ditch Recording Date: January 18, 1905 Recording No.: Book 287 of Deeds, Page 456 Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. 7. Covenants, conditions and restrictions but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if any, including but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, source of income, gender, gender identity, gender expression, medical condition or genetic information, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth in the document Recording Date: March 24, 1947 Recording No.: Book 1461, Page 405, of Official Records CLTA Preliminary Report Form-Modified(11.17.06) Printed: 01.04.18 @ 10:09 AM by GS SCA0002402.doc/Updated: 08.31.17 4 CA—SPS-1-17-FSBC-8011700408 Title No.: FSBC-8011700408MO Update: A EXCEPTIONS (continued) Said covenants, conditions and restrictions provide that a violation thereof shall not defeat the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust made in good faith and for value. Modification(s)of said covenants, conditions and restrictions Recording Date: January 16, 1950 Recording No.: Book 1909, Page 353, of Official Records 8. Easement(s)for the purpose(s)shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Pacific Gas and Electric Company, a California Corporation and Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company, a California Corporation Purpose: Anchor Recording Date: January 21, 1950 Recording No.: Book 2001, Page 549, Official Records Affects: A strip of land of the uniform width of 3 feet, lying equally on each side of the common boundary line between Lots 30 and 31, and extending from the Northerly boundary line of Hamilton Avenue, Northerly 20 feet, as said lots and avenues are delineated and so designated upon that certain map of Tract No. 390 Winchester Villa, recorded in Book 12 of Maps, at Page 55, records of Santa Clara County Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars. 9. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, Amount: $600,000.00 Dated: January 2, 2015 Trustor/Grantor 95 Hamilton LLC, a California limited liability company Trustee: Robil, Inc. Beneficiary: Kenji Yoshimura and Jeanette K. Yoshimura, trustees of the Yoshimura Revocable Trust, dated December 13, 2005; E. J.Vallortigara and Betty Vallortigara, Trustees of the Family Trust, dated May 12, 1987; Jay E.Vallortigara, an unmarried man; Kennette O.Yoshimura, a single woman; Peitao Ting and Jinene Teiko Ting, Trustees of the Peitao and Jinene Ting Trust, dated April 28, 2006; "Gaier Family Trust dated April 3, 1995 and Jon D. Gaier and Fay M. Gaier, as Trustees"; Jinea Yoshimura, a single woman, as their interest appear of record Loan No.: 20069 Recording Date: January 21, 2015 Recording No.: 22832283, of Official Records • CLTA Preliminary Report Form-Modified(11.17.06) Printed: 01.04.18 @ 10:09 AM by GS SCA0002402.doc/Updated: 08.31.17 5 CA—SPS-1-17-FSBC-8011700408 Title No.: FSBC-8011700408M0 Update: A EXCEPTIONS (continued) 10. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, Amount: $600,000.00 Dated: June 9, 2017 Trustor/Grantor 95 Hamilton LLC Trustee: Cornerstone Title Company, a California corporation Beneficiary: Dreamweaver Investments Trust, dated April 10, 2012 as to an undivided 25.00% interest, Pensco Trust Company FBO Ling Wang, as to an undivided 35.00% interest,Aravind Vincent, an unmarried man, as to an undivided 25.00% interest, Specialized IRA Services FBO Paradise Gold 401K Plan 101-801 Carol Bean, as to an undivided 8.33% interest, and Sandy Chen, a married woman as her sole and separate property Recording Date: June 20, 2017 Recording No.: 23677760, of Official Records 11. Any rights of the parties in possession of a portion of, or all of, said Land,which rights are not disclosed by the public records. The Company will require, for review, a full and complete copy of any unrecorded agreement, contract, license and/or lease, together with all supplements, assignments and amendments thereto, before issuing any policy of title insurance without excepting this item from coverage. The Company reserves the right to except additional items and/or make additional requirements after reviewing said documents. 12. Matters which may be disclosed by an inspection and/or by a correct ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey of said Land that is satisfactory to the Company, and/or by inquiry of the parties in possession thereof. 13. The Company will require that an Owner's Affidavit be completed by the party(s) named below before the issuance of any policy of title insurance. Party(ies): 95 Hamilton LLC, a California limited liability company The Company reserves the right to add additional items or make further requirements after review of the requested Affidavit. CLTA Preliminary Report Form-Modified(11.17.06) Printed: 01.04.18 @ 10:09 AM by GS SCA0002402.doc/Updated: 08.31.17 6 CA—SPS-1-17-FSBC-8011700408 Title No.: FSBC-8011700408MO Update: A EXCEPTIONS (continued) 14. The Company will require the following documents for review prior to the issuance of any title insurance predicated upon a conveyance or encumbrance from the entity named below. Limited Liability Company: 95 Hamilton LLC, a California limited liability company a. A copy of its operating agreement, if any, and any and all amendments, supplements and/or modifications thereto, certified by the appropriate manager or member. b. If a domestic Limited Liability Company, a copy of its Articles of Organization and all amendment thereto with the appropriate filing stamps. c. If the Limited Liability Company is member-managed a full and complete current list of members certified by the appropriate manager or member. d. A current dated certificate of good standing from the proper governmental authority of the state in which the entity was created e. If less than all members, or managers, as appropriate, will be executing the closing documents, furnish evidence of the authority of those signing. The Company reserves the right to add additional items or make further requirements after review of the requested documentation. 15. In order to complete this report, the Company requires a Statement of Information to be completed by the following party(ies), Party(ies): Saul Flores and Ivan Gospich (LLC Members) The Company reserves the right to add additional items or make further requirements after review of the requested Statement of Information. NOTE: The Statement of Information is necessary to complete the search and examination of title under this order. Any title search includes matters that are indexed by name only, and having a completed Statement of Information assists the Company in the elimination of certain matters which appear to involve the parties but in fact affect another party with the same or similar name. Be assured that the Statement of Information is essential and will be kept strictly confidential to this file. 16. The transaction contemplated in connection with this Report is subject to the review and approval of the Company's Corporate Underwriting Department. The Company reserves the right to add additional items or make further requirements after such review. END OF EXCEPTIONS CLTA Preliminary Report Form-Modified(11.17.06) Printed: 01.04.18 @ 10:09 AM by GS SCA0002402.doc/Updated: 08.31.17 7 CA—SPS-1-17-FSBC-8011700408 Title No.: FSBC-8011700408MO Update: A NOTES Note 1. Note: The charge for a policy of title insurance,when issued through this application for title insurance, will be based on the Short Term Rate. Note 2. Note: The only conveyance(s) affecting said Land,which recorded within 24 months of the date of this report, are as follows: Grantor: Peninsula Histopathology Lab, Inc., a California corporation Grantee: 95 Hamilton LLC, a California limited liability company Recording Date: January 21, 2015 Recording No.: 22832282, of Official Records Note 3. Notice: Please be aware that due to the conflict between federal and state laws concerning the cultivation, distribution, manufacture or sale of marijuana, the Company is not able to close or insure any transaction involving Land that is associated with these activities. Note 4. Your application for title insurance was placed by reference to only a street address or tax identification number. Based on our records, we believe that the legal description in this report covers the parcel(s) of Land that you requested. If the legal description is incorrect, the seller/borrower must notify the Company and/or the settlement company in order to prevent errors and to be certain that the correct parcel(s)of Land will appear on any documents to be recorded in connection with this transaction and on the policy of title insurance. Note 5. Note: If a county recorder, title insurance company, escrow company, real estate broker, real estate agent or association provides a copy of a declaration, governing document or deed to any person, California law requires that the document provided shall include a statement regarding any unlawful restrictions. Said statement is to be in at least 14-point bold face type and may be stamped on the first page of any document provided or included as a cover page attached to the requested document. Should a party to this transaction request a copy of any document reported herein that fits this category, the statement is to be included in the manner described. Note 6. Note: Any documents being executed in conjunction with this transaction must be signed in the presence of an authorized Company employee, an authorized employee of an agent, an authorized employee of the insured lender, or by using Bancsery or other approved third-party service. If the above requirement cannot be met, please call the Company at the number provided in this report. END OF NOTES CLTA Preliminary Report Form-Modified(11.17.06) Printed: 01.04.18 @ 10:09 AM by GS SCA0002402.doc I Updated: 08.31.17 8 CA—SPS-1-17-FSBC-8011700408 FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL PRIVACY NOTICE Effective: May 1, 2015; Last Updated: March 1, 2017 At Fidelity National Financial, Inc., we respect and believe it is important to protect the privacy of consumers and our customers. This Privacy Notice explains how we collect, use,and protect any information that we collect from you,when and to whom we disclose such information, and the choices you have about the use of that information. A summary of the Privacy Notice is below, and we encourage you to review the entirety of the Privacy Notice following this summary. You can opt-out of certain disclosures by following our opt-out procedure set forth at the end of this Privacy Notice. Types of Information Collected. You may provide us How Information is Collected. We may collect personal with certain personal information about you, like your information from you via applications, forms, and contact information, address demographic information, correspondence we receive from you and others related to social security number (SSN), driver's license, passport, our transactions with you. When you visit our websites other government ID numbers and/or financial information. from your computer or mobile device, we automatically We may also receive browsing information from your collect and store certain information available to us Internet browser, computer and/or mobile device if you visit through your Internet browser or computer equipment to or use our websites or applications. optimize your website experience. Use of Collected Information. We request and use your When Information Is Disclosed. We may disclose your personal information to provide products and services to information to our affiliates and/or nonaffiliated parties you, to improve our products and services, and to providing services for you or us, to law enforcement communicate with you about these products and services. agencies or governmental authorities, as required by law, We may also share your contact information with our and to parties whose interest in title must be determined. affiliates for marketing purposes. Choices With Your Information. Your decision to Information From Children. We do not knowingly collect submit information to us is entirely up to you. You can information from children who are under the age of 13,and opt-out of certain disclosure or use of your information or our website is not intended to attract children. choose to not provide any personal information to us. Privacy Outside the Website. We are not responsible for International Users. By providing us with your the privacy practices of third parties, even if our website information, you consent to its transfer, processing and links to those parties'websites. storage outside of your country of residence, as well as the fact that we will handle such information consistent with this Privacy Notice. The California Online Privacy Protection Act. Some FNF companies provide services to mortgage loan servicers and, in some cases, their websites collect information on behalf of mortgage loan servicers. The mortgage loan servicer is responsible for taking action or making changes to any consumer information submitted through those websites. Your Consent To This Privacy Notice. By submitting Access and Correction: Contact Us. If you desire to information to us or by using our website, you are contact us regarding this notice or your information,please accepting and agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Notice. contact us at privacvAfnf.com or as directed at the end of this Privacy Notice. Privacy Statement Printed: 01.04.18 @ 10:09 AM by GS SCA0002402.doc/Updated: 08.31.17 CA-FT-FSBC-01500.080801-FSBC-8011700408 FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL PRIVACY NOTICE Effective: May 1, 2015; Last Updated: March 1, 2017 Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its majority-owned subsidiary companies providing title insurance, real estate- and loan-related services (collectively, "FNF", "our" or"we") respect and are committed to protecting your privacy. We will take reasonable steps to ensure that your Personal Information and Browsing Information will only be used in compliance with this Privacy Notice and applicable laws. This Privacy Notice is only in effect for Personal Information and Browsing Information collected and/or owned by or on behalf of FNF, including Personal Information and Browsing Information collected through any FNF website, online service or application (collectively, the"Website"). Types of Information Collected We may collect two types of information from you: Personal Information and Browsing Information. Personal Information. FNF may collect the following categories of Personal Information: • contact information (e.g., name, address, phone number, email address); • demographic information (e.g., date of birth, gender, marital status); • social security number(SSN), driver's license, passport, and other government ID numbers; • financial account information; and • other personal information needed from you to provide title insurance, real estate-and loan-related services to you. Browsing Information. FNF may collect the following categories of Browsing Information: • Internet Protocol (or IP) address or device ID/UDID, protocol and sequence information; • browser language and type; • domain name system requests; • browsing history, such as time spent at a domain, time and date of your visit and number of clicks; • http headers, application client and server banners; and • operating system and fingerprinting data. How Information is Collected In the course of our business,we may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources: • applications or other forms we receive from you or your authorized representative; • the correspondence you and others send to us; • information we receive through the Website; • information about your transactions with, or services performed by, us, our affiliates or nonaffiliated third parties; and • information from consumer or other reporting agencies and public records maintained by governmental entities that we obtain directly from those entities, our affiliates or others. If you visit or use our Website, we may collect Browsing Information from you as follows: • Browser Log Files. Our servers automatically log each visitor to the Website and collect and record certain browsing information about each visitor. The Browsing Information includes generic information and reveals nothing personal about the user. • Cookies. When you visit our Website, a "cookie" may be sent to your computer. A cookie is a small piece of data that is sent to your Internet browser from a web server and stored on your computer's hard drive. When you visit a website again, the cookie allows the website to recognize your computer. Cookies may store user preferences and other information. You can choose whether or not to accept cookies by changing your Internet browser settings,which may impair or limit some functionality of the Website. Use of Collected Information Information collected by FNF is used for three main purposes: • To provide products and services to you or any affiliate or third party who is obtaining services on your behalf or in connection with a transaction involving you. • To improve our products and services. • To communicate with you and to inform you about our, our affiliates' and third parties' products and services, jointly or independently. Privacy Statement Printed: 01.04.18 @ 10:09 AM by GS SCA0002402.doc/Updated: 08.31.17 CA-FT-FSBC-01500.080801-FSBC-8011700408 When Information Is Disclosed We may provide your Personal Information (excluding information we receive from consumer or other credit reporting agencies) and Browsing Information to various individuals and companies, as permitted by law, without obtaining your prior authorization. Such laws do not allow consumers to restrict these disclosures. Please see the section "Choices With Your Personal Information" to learn how to limit the discretionary disclosure of your Personal Information and Browsing Information. Disclosures of your Personal Information may be made to the following categories of affiliates and nonaffiliated third parties: • to third parties to provide you with services you have requested, and to enable us to detect or prevent criminal activity,fraud, material misrepresentation, or nondisclosure; • to our affiliate financial service providers for their use to market their products or services to you; • to nonaffiliated third party service providers who provide or perform services on our behalf and use the disclosed information only in connection with such services; • to nonaffiliated third party service providers with whom we perform joint marketing, pursuant to an agreement with them to market financial products or services to you; • to law enforcement or other governmental authority in connection with an investigation, or civil or criminal subpoena or court order; • to lenders, lien holders,judgment creditors, or other parties claiming an interest in title whose claim or interest must be determined, settled, paid, or released prior to closing; and • other third parties for whom you have given us written authorization to disclose your Personal Information. We may disclose Personal Information and/or Browsing Information when required by law or in the good-faith belief that such disclosure is necessary to: • comply with a legal process or applicable laws; • enforce this Privacy Notice; • investigate or respond to claims that any material, document, image, graphic, logo, design, audio, video or any other information provided by you violates the rights of a third party; or • protect the rights, property or personal safety of FNF, its users or the public. We maintain reasonable safeguards to keep your Personal Information secure. When we provide Personal Information to our affiliates or third party service providers as discussed in this Privacy Notice, we expect that these parties process such information in compliance with our Privacy Notice or in a manner that is in compliance with applicable privacy laws. The use of your information by a business partner may be subject to that party's own Privacy Notice. Unless permitted by law, we do not disclose information we collect from consumer or credit reporting agencies with our affiliates or others without your consent. We reserve the right to transfer your Personal Information, Browsing Information, and any other information, in connection with the sale or other disposition of all or part of the FNF business and/or assets, or in the event of our bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency, receivership or an assignment for the benefit of creditors. You expressly agree and consent to the use and/or transfer of the foregoing information in connection with any of the above described proceedings. We cannot and will not be responsible for any breach of security by a third party or for any actions of any third party that receives any of the information that is disclosed to us. Choices With Your Information Whether you submit Personal Information or Browsing Information to FNF is entirely up to you. If you decide not to submit Personal Information or Browsing Information, FNF may not be able to provide certain services or products to you. The uses of your Personal Information and/or Browsing Information that, by law, you cannot limit, include: • for our everyday business purposes — to process your transactions, maintain your account(s), to respond to law enforcement or other governmental authority in connection with an investigation, or civil or criminal subpoenas or court orders, or report to credit bureaus; • for our own marketing purposes; • for joint marketing with financial companies; and • for our affiliates' everyday business purposes—information about your transactions and experiences. Privacy Statement Printed: 01.04.18 @ 10:09 AM by GS SCA0002402.doc/Updated: 08.31.17 CA-FT-FSBC-01500.080801-FSBC-8011700408 • You may choose to prevent FNF from disclosing or using your Personal Information and/or Browsing Information under the following circumstances ("opt-out"): • for our affiliates' everyday business purposes—information about your creditworthiness; and • for our affiliates to market to you. To the extent permitted above, you may opt-out of disclosure or use of your Personal Information and Browsing Information by notifying us by one of the methods at the end of this Privacy Notice. We do not share your personal information with non-affiliates for their direct marketing purposes. For California Residents: We will not share your Personal Information and Browsing Information with nonaffiliated third parties, except as permitted by California law. Currently, our policy is that we do not recognize"do not track" requests from Internet browsers and similar devices. For Nevada Residents: You may be placed on our internal Do Not Call List by calling (888) 934-3354 or by contacting us via the information set forth at the end of this Privacy Notice. Nevada law requires that we also provide you with the following contact information: Bureau of Consumer Protection, Office of the Nevada Attorney General, 555 E. Washington St., Suite 3900, Las Vegas, NV 89101; Phone number: (702) 486-3132; email: BCPINFO@ag.state.nv.us. For Oregon Residents: We will not share your Personal Information and Browsing Information with nonaffiliated third parties for marketing purposes, except after you have been informed by us of such sharing and had an opportunity to indicate that you do not want a disclosure made for marketing purposes. For Vermont Residents: We will not share your Personal Information and Browsing Information with nonaffiliated third parties, except as permitted by Vermont law, such as to process your transactions or to maintain your account. In addition, we will not share information about your creditworthiness with our affiliates except with your authorization. For joint marketing in Vermont, we will only disclose your name, contact information and information about your transactions. Information From Children The Website is meant for adults and is not intended or designed to attract children under the age of thirteen (13).We do not collect Personal Information from any person that we know to be under the age of thirteen (13) without permission from a parent or guardian. By using the Website, you affirm that you are over the age of 13 and will abide by the terms of this Privacy Notice. Privacy Outside the Website The Website may contain links to other websites. FNF is not and cannot be responsible for the privacy practices or the content of any of those other websites. International Users FNF's headquarters is located within the United States. If you reside outside the United States or are a citizen of the European Union, please note that we may transfer your Personal Information and/or Browsing Information outside of your country of residence or the European Union for any of the purposes described in this Privacy Notice. By providing FNF with your Personal Information and/or Browsing Information, you consent to our collection and transfer of such information in accordance with this Privacy Notice. The California Online Privacy Protection Act For some FNF websites, such as the Customer CareNet("CCN"), FNF is acting as a third party service provider to a mortgage loan servicer. In those instances, we may collect certain information on behalf of that mortgage loan servicer via the website. The information which we may collect on behalf of the mortgage loan servicer is as follows: • first and last name; • property address; • user name and password; • loan number; • social security number-masked upon entry; • email address; • three security questions and answers; and • IP address. Privacy Statement Printed: 01.04.18 @ 10:09 AM by GS SCA0002402.doc/Updated: 08.31.17 CA-FT-FSBC-01500.080801-FSBC-8011700408 • The information you submit through the website is then transferred to your mortgage loan servicer by way of CCN. The mortgage loan servicer is responsible for taking action or making changes to any consumer information submitted through this website. For example, if you believe that your payment or user information is incorrect,you must contact your mortgage loan servicer. CCN does not share consumer information with third parties, other than (1) those with which the mortgage loan servicer has contracted to interface with the CCN application, or (2) law enforcement or other governmental authority in connection with an investigation, or civil or criminal subpoenas or court orders. All sections of this Privacy Notice apply to your interaction with CCN, except for the sections titled "Choices with Your Information" and "Access and Correction." If you have questions regarding the choices you have with regard to your personal information or how to access or correct your personal information, you should contact your mortgage loan servicer. Your Consent To This Privacy Notice By submitting Personal Information and/or Browsing Information to FNF, you consent to the collection and use of the information by us in compliance with this Privacy Notice. Amendments to the Privacy Notice will be posted on the Website. Each time you provide information to us, or we receive information about you, following any amendment of this Privacy Notice will signify your assent to and acceptance of its revised terms for all previously collected information and information collected from you in the future. We may use comments, information or feedback that you submit to us in any manner that we may choose without notice or compensation to you. Accessing and Correcting Information; Contact Us If you have questions, would like to access or correct your Personal Information, or want to opt-out of information sharing with our affiliates for their marketing purposes, please send your requests to privacyfnf.com or by mail or phone to: Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 601 Riverside Avenue Jacksonville, Florida 32204 Attn: Chief Privacy Officer (888) 934-3354 Privacy Statement Printed: 01.04.18 @ 10:09 AM by GS SCA0002402.doc/Updated: 08.31.17 CA-FT-FSBC-01500.080801-FSBC-8011700408 ATTACHMENT ONE CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY-1990 EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs,attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not limited to building or zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations) restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating (i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land; (iii)a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or(iv)environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a defect,lien,or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. (b) Any governmental police power not excluded by(a)above,except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or notice of a defect,lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy. 2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without knowledge. 3. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims or other matters: (a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,but created,suffered,assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy;or (e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for the estate or interest insured by this policy. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness,to comply with the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending law. 6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the estate or interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws. EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE-SCHEDULE B, PART I This policy does not insure against loss or damage(and the Company will not pay costs,attorneys'fees or expenses)which arise by reason of: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments,or notices of such proceedings,whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements,liens or encumbrances,or claims thereof,not shown by the public records. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which are not shown by the public records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b)reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c)water rights, claims or title to water,whether or not the matters excepted under(a),(b)or(c)are shown by the public records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services,labor or material not shown by the public records. Attachment One(05/06/16) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) CLTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (12-02-13) ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE EXCLUSIONS In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B,You are not insured against loss,costs,attorneys'fees,and expenses resulting from: 1. Governmental police power,and the existence or violation of those portions of any law or government regulation concerning: a. building; b. zoning; c. land use; d. improvements on the Land; e. land division;and f. environmental protection. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 8.a., 14, 15, 16, 18, 19,20,23 or 27. 2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14 or 15. 3. The right to take the Land by condemning it. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 17. 4. Risks: a. that are created,allowed,or agreed to by You,whether or not they are recorded in the Public Records; b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date,but not to Us,unless they are recorded in the Public Records at the Policy Date; c. that result in no loss to You;or d. that first occur after the Policy Date-this does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 7,8.e.,25,26,27 or 28. 5. Failure to pay value for Your Title. 6. Lack of a right: a. to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to in paragraph 3 of Schedule A;and b. in streets,alleys,or waterways that touch the Land. This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or 21. 7. The transfer of the Title to You is invalid as a preferential transfer or as a fraudulent transfer or conveyance under federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors'rights laws. 8. Contamination,explosion,fire,flooding,vibration,fracturing,earthquake or subsidence. 9. Negligence by a person or an Entity exercising a right to extract or develop minerals,water,or any other substances. LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner's Coverage Statement as follows: • For Covered Risk 16, 18, 19 and 21,Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A. The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows: Your Deductible Amount Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability Covered Risk 16: 1.00%of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A $ 10,000.00 or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 18: 1.00%of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A $ 25,000.00 or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 19: 1.00%of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A $ 25,000.00 or $5,000.00 (whichever is less) Covered Risk 21: 1.00%of Policy Amount Shown in Schedule A $ 5,000.00 or $2,500.00 (whichever is less) Attachment One(05/06/16) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) 2006 ALTA LOAN POLICY(06-17-06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys'fees,or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting,or relating to (i) the occupancy, use,or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character,dimensions,or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land;or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b)does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims,or other matters (a) created,suffered,assumed,or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy(however,this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11, 13,or 14);or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing-business laws of the state where the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit protection or truth-in-lending law. 6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage,is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer,or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 13(b)of this policy. 7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public Records. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11(b). The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage,the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE [Except as provided in Schedule B-Part II,[t[or T]his policy does not insure against loss or damage, and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys'fees,or expenses that arise by reason of: [PART I [The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage,the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: 1. (a)Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b)proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings,whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 3. Easements, liens or encumbrances,or claims thereof,not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachment,encumbrance,violation,variation,or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b)reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c)water rights, claims or title to water,whether or not the matters excepted under(a),(b),or(c)are shown by the Public Records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services,labor or material not shown by the Public Records.] PART II In addition to the matters set forth in Part I of this Schedule, the Title is subject to the following matters, and the Company insures against loss or damage sustained in the event that they are not subordinate to the lien of the Insured Mortgage:] Attachment One(05/06/16) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) 2006 ALTA OWNER'S POLICY(06-17-06) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys'fees,or expenses that arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or govemmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting,or relating to (i) the occupancy,use,or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character,dimensions,or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land;or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a)does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b)does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims,or other matters (a) created,suffered,assumed,or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy(however,this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 9 and 10);or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title. 4. Any claim,by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy,state insolvency,or similar creditors'rights laws,that the transaction vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A,is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer;or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9 of this policy. 5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A. The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage,the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE This policy does not insure against loss or damage,and the Company will not pay costs,attorneys'fees,or expenses that arise by reason of: [The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage,the Exceptions from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage: 1. (a)Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; (b)proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings,whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 3. Easements,liens or encumbrances,or claims thereof,not shown by the Public Records. 4. Any encroachment,encumbrance,violation,variation,or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public Records. 5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b)reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c)water rights, claims or title to water,whether or not the matters excepted under(a),(b),or(c)are shown by the Public Records. 6. Any lien or right to a lien for services,labor or material not shown by the Public Records.] 7. [Variable exceptions such as taxes,easements,CC&R's,etc.,shown here.] Attachment One(05/06/16) ATTACHMENT ONE (CONTINUED) ALTA EXPANDED COVERAGE RESIDENTIAL LOAN POLICY-ASSESSMENTS PRIORITY(04-02-15) EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage,costs,attorneys' fees or expenses which arise by reason of: 1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or govemmental regulation (including those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating, prohibiting,or relating to (i) the occupancy, use,or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character,dimensions,or location of any improvement erected on the Land; (iii) the subdivision of land;or (iv) environmental protection; or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5,6, 13(c), 13(d), 14 or 16. (b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b)does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5,6, 13(c), 13(d), 14 or 16. 2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8. 3. Defects,liens,encumbrances,adverse claims,or other matters (a) created,suffered,assumed,or agreed to by the Insured Claimant; (b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this policy; (c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant; (d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy(however,this does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 11, 16, 17, 18, 19,20,21,22,23,24,27 or 28);or (e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage. 4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing-business laws of the state where the Land is situated. 5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury,or any consumer credit protection or truth-in-lending law. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 26. 6. Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability or lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage as to Advances or modifications made after the Insured has Knowledge that the vestee shown in Schedule A is no longer the owner of the estate or interest covered by this policy. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 11. 7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by govemmental authority and created or attaching subsequent to Date of Policy. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 11(b)or 25. 8. The failure of the residential structure,or any portion of it,to have been constructed before,on or after Date of Policy in accordance with applicable building codes. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 5 or 6. 9. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws, that the transaction creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage,is (a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer,or (b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 27(b)of this policy. 10. Contamination,explosion,fire,flooding,vibration,fracturing,earthquake,or subsidence. 11. Negligence by a person or an Entity exercising a right to extract or develop minerals,water,or any other substances. Attachment One(05/06/16) Notice of Available Discounts Pursuant to Section 2355.3 in Title 10 of the California Code of Regulations Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("FNF") must deliver a notice of each discount available under our current rate filing along with the delivery of escrow instructions, a preliminary report or commitment. Please be aware that the provision of this notice does not constitute a waiver of the consumer's right to be charged the filed rate. As such, your transaction may not qualify for the below discounts. You are encouraged to discuss the applicability of one or more of the below discounts with a Company representative. These discounts are generally described below; consult the rate manual for a full description of the terms, conditions and requirements for such discount. These discounts only apply to transactions involving services rendered by the FNF Family of Companies. This notice only applies to transactions involving property improved with a one-to-four family residential dwelling. Not all discounts are offered by every FNF Company. The discount will only be applicable to the FNF Company as indicated by the named discount. FNF Underwritten Title Companies Underwritten by FNF Underwriters CTC—Chicago Title Company CTIC—Chicago Title Insurance Company CLTC-Commonwealth Land Title Company CLTIC—Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company FNTC—Fidelity National Title Company FNTIC—Fidelity National Title Insurance Company FNTCCA—Fidelity National Title Company of California FNTIC—Fidelity National Title Insurance Company TICOR—Ticor Title Company of California CTIC—Chicago Title Insurance Company LTC—Lawyer's Title Company CLTIC—Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company Available Discounts CREDIT FOR PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORTS AND/OR COMMITMENTS ON SUBSEQUENT POLICIES (CTIC, FNTIC) Where no major change in the title has occurred since the issuance of the original report or commitment, the order may be reopened within twelve (12) to thirty-six (36) months and all or a portion of the charge previously paid for the report or commitment may be credited on a subsequent policy charge. DISASTER LOANS (CTIC, CLTIC, FNTIC) The charge for a Lender's Policy (Standard or Extended coverage) covering the financing or refinancing by an owner of record, within twenty-four (24) months of the date of a declaration of a disaster area by the government of the United States or the State of California on any land located in said area, which was partially or totally destroyed in the disaster,will be fifty percent(50%)of the appropriate title insurance rate. CHURCHES OR CHARITABLE NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS(CTIC, FNTIC) On properties used as a church or for charitable purposes within the scope of the normal activities of such entities, provided said charge is normally the church's obligation the charge for an owner's policy shall be fifty percent (50%) to seventy percent (70%) of the appropriate title insurance rate, depending on the type of coverage selected. The charge for a lender's policy shall be thirty-two percent (32%) to fifty percent (50%) of the appropriate title insurance rate,depending on the type of coverage selected. Notice of Available Discounts Printed: 01.04.18(4110:09 AM by GS SCA0002402.doc/Updated: 08.31.17 CA-FT-FSBC-01500.080801-FSBC-8011700408 Al-i = OFFICE OF COUNTY ASSESSOR SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA a BOOK PAGE iiT3 =av 279 27 tr)CV 28 29 / c a iN .•< v)� � O j 163 I \ // U a — DE TRACEY -- --- — — - STREET — 38 o m 1 ;� 0 N-1 M 1455 /459 /493 /45'7 TRACT N9 1799/47s /483 /487 /48/ /498 10411- m b ( r 7 all-• 041.61 ' 37.65 ; 57.85 5785 57.85 i 62 1 60 I 62 57.85 57.65 i 5785 57.85 `39.6 - 163.01' O (/' � I 1 1 H *n ..,� ,ram I II �tm 58 E2 m; j 7 a 0' 130, 1 n n ml m m r o m a 98_60 J PCL 1 Z c*0 N 1 p� 8 4) 9 off /0 " // o /2 0 /3 0: /4 /5 0. 16 NI /7 n /8 m /9 20 60' m- --- le A 39 (� P M. 338-M-30 m1 _ _ _ 1 4: f @ 0; ,?).ii " 1 - - I m o b°r 57 23 Q a CD - I 1 I I 1 at b �% a; • d. W 36 35 : 34 i 33 j 32 31 i 30 29 ; 28 27 26 j 25 I 24 a '0 Ta W 62 , ,••_ 40.151701 ..._L... , 63.98 a ..�• a 97.01_... 183.01 �_• illal .L... .1.256.60 ...s... —L...._�. 7 X 180 234.87 236.60 141.40 141.01 139:01 1 1n 7 F 4. i 0 a n1 7 r O V) NIn 7 I I 1 2 :n 15 ?/ N M b a 56 16 ii 33 �9 $^ I t4 N m o fai M 0.936 AC. NET ; 0.957 AC. NET �n wl,3s 141 r a art= _._._------- Z 132 �1 31 7aD• S p� H •m .3.15 r 34 e• 14 22 ot. J an 55 17 (D n o A T[�D r 0 ' 13 23 n a o 54 I s .' '2 LLA. 20274210 5-0,‘• "1-(11. 5 n —'---�p „ ESTHER 0.1"0 a - _.-__._ 16749 �\, a -.- •• 132 AVENUE -- ____ ., ,� 17017 -t I 7n119 cu ,.1 I o LI n F ° ±,5 33 2i 12 24 na an 53 19 I 30 62 ma „r'''''a) bo~- 5 0.995 AC.NET y 1.60 AC. NET 't n, - 30 X11 3—c m � E i. o 11 25 nea m„ 52 20 29 63 ,f)f: 37 et 7 C__. 1,1?: 4 JOt -------'F' ---- of 0 4 36 0l 3 �M I • 7 0 f� „r, D :r 2 N a• 10 :0 o1 p n 21 I 28 e)(D °m a ti � p9p� 26 "K(rZ^ n 5/ i 64 s e DETAIL SCALE I"=30' N-- o)�h-- 4 --7I a fin° - -- - WI-HV141 1tO n oW a•n �2^ ::T :: 46 b lilm b=�bY� 5 U E141 Z - 1393 } 270.94 3 a49• 0oan — 26 w 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 3 Dap o __ 3 PTN.LOT 2 ; PTN. LOT I� 141 59 } 141 Z t20 19 18 17 16 15 14 w 0•an 1.04 AC. NET CC F -t 47 -e O 0 am / A �:; 7 29 n M e r 24 25 n '� CONDOMINIUM PLAN Q� - 66.34 m m W 125 (1391 AL TRACT N27508 7",.(. ; 9{.54 �33 m a m 66.40 T- 75 Vl --- _r— -+ 49.99 T 73.01 Q O(D rt $ 1 = �� p O -;if ... 141.4 4 I 3 1 2 , 1 *7 m :_ 7 a J 0.35 AC. 1 p M m.0 n 2 n / g V 3/ ° 11J m eo W fD m 30 '17p; m - (o I "VI p O 65 45 (0 2 0 "� m 6 0 - - ' SEE DETAIL I I • -1 a 0 74.91 ' 75 115.08 c J 203.44 50 60 , yet d /462 /3/0 1482 /138 r...�121.56 ! 55.96 I 66 1 7'19.29,,..:°'°' CU[D `44.... 1:, /150 j 1580 /600 —74‹ai P.G.KEITH'S SUED. N2 2 30. -`-- S. WINCHESTER Q - -4- --(FMLY. S.C. L.G. ROAD) S TRACT N2 7508 a BOULEVARD r —t CD O WINCHESTER n� 0 EXECUTIVE OFFICE �aErw>l63 o CD J> a W CONDOMINIUMS LAWRENCE E STONE- ASSESSOR assessment m C5d6e -0 01 "'1' ¢'� 305 trdmassessment pupo5ro ady. CD 7 o p "-ICC Compiled under R.8 T.Code,0 Sec 327. a a 2. Effective Year201- 0 -i -4J • 'axspiwpv S)PQM allgnd ZI0ZPgAV . a3Ai90al P A.N REVIEW ROUTER CITY OF CAMPBELL ' ew Submittal I❑Resubinittai: (2°d,3r`',4`h,5`t'Review) DRevision to Existing Permit • RECEIVED t (7 APN#277 q—�� 4 r APPLICATION/PERMIT# ----c JOB ADDRESS - ..1.• JOB DESCRIPTION f . 1'1-.4)67 c • k305 èMMERC1AL ❑RESIDENTIAL. t.;,.. Plans ( '' , ,, Green=Point Rated Checklist ,, p ,(Ajj3, tructural Cal WVSD tr'`" et.e , VSoils/Geotechnical Report School Fee.Form . Truss Cafes. Health Department Approval T-24 Calcs. • Response Letter CA Green Specs - Specifications Initials J'a ,ui.ichng .' T' ), ( - Chec ,ed By ;� ! Date: OA.APPROVED [NOT APPROVED 0. . " tructura- ?'0 /Lv�Date ('-' ) 4.O.X DAPPRO VED - DNOT A2PRO'VED . 2)- •,.t 1 cv w- >24> () C� , `t ..: Tanning Zone: P an Checke By: Date: • C ) DAPPROVED KNOT APPROVED • • Oa Works al( iq- an Checkd By: Dater. r % C Eo?ti ` ) ❑APPROVED iNOT APPROVED • I leire an Checked y: Date: C- t) - [(APPROVED KNOT APPROVED • MEMORANDUM CITY OF CAMPBELL TO: Bill Bruckart, Building Official DATE: 05/30/2017 I 1 FROM: Doris C. Quai Hoi, Project Engineer (408) 866-215 SUBJECT: BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Site Address: 95 E Hamilton Avenue (APN 279-27-096) For File No(s): BLD2017-569 (PLN2015-274 and 275) Project Description: New 5,772 SF 2-story office building on a vacant lot that was previously merged under application PLN2010-62. Applicant: Saul Flores PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Do not include the Street Improvement Plan set and the On-Site Grading Plan set in the 'Building plan set. 2. Resolution No. 4354: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant is required to complete the Conditions of Approval for the project approved by the Planning Commission on December -13, 2016 (PLN2015-274 and 275). See attached Resolution. 3. Public Improvements: The scope of this project triggers the requirement for Boulevard Frontage Improvements as required by Campbell Municipal Code 11.24.040. The City of Campbell's adopted Streetscape Standards identify this portion of Hamilton Avenue as an Image Street with very specific frontage improvement requirements. This project triggers the requirement for the installation of the streetscape improvements. The applicant will be required to construct these improvements and have them completed prior to occupying the building. The Streetscape Standards can be viewed here: (http://vvww.cityofcampbell.com/DocumentCenterNiew/168) Visit the City's website and follow the submittal requirements for Public Works once this application has received entitlement. The checklist for the various plans required for submittal can be found on the City's Website at City Services►Public Works►Engineering►Land Development►Documents, (or use this link: http://www.cityofcampbell.com/206/Documents). See instructions on: 1. Checklist for Grading and Drainage and 2. Checklist for Street Improvement Plans. The Building Permit will not be issued until all Public Works Conditions of Approval have been satisfied. These Conditions of Approval are a supplement to the plans by MFA Engineers &Associates. The plans are not approved for construction. Further plan checking by Public Works will be required post entitlement. 4. Pervious Pavement: On Tuesday September 27th, Public Works met with Ali Abiani, Civil Engineer on record, and discussed the relocation of the permeable pavers to be installed along the westerly surface parking areas to reduce the total amount of impervious area resulting-in keeping below the size threshold for C.3 applicability and eliminate the need for storm water treatment measures. J:\LandDev\Conditions\Bldg\Hamilton E 95 Bldg.docx Page 1 of 1 Exhibit A- Conditions of Approval Page 7 of 11 PLN2015-274 and.PLN2015-275 — 95 E. Hamilton Avenue Site &Architectural Review Permit and Tree Removal Permit c. School District: Campbell Union School District (378-3405) Campbell Union High School District (371-0960) Moreland School District (874-2900) Cambrian School District (377-2103) d. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (Demolitions Only) e. Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health - f. San Jose Water Company (279-7900) • 41. P.G.& E.: Applicant is advised to contact Pacific Gas and Electric Company as early as possible in the approval process. Service installations, changes and/or - relocations may require substantial scheduling time and can cause significant delays in the approval process. 'Applicant should also consult with P.G. and E. concerning utility easements, distribution pole locations and required conductor.clearances. 42. CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE: This project is subject to the mandatory requirements of Chapter 5 of the California Green Building Code 2013. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT • 43. Response Letter: Upon submittal of the Street Improvement Plans and the Grading and Drainage Plans, the applicant shall provide an itemized response letter verifying that all the Public Works Conditions of Approval have been addressed. • 44. Preliminary Title Report: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall provide a current (within the past 6 months) Preliminary Title -Report. 45. Soils Report: Upon submittal of the Parcel/Final Map, applicant shall provide.a soils report prepared by a registered geotechnical or civil engineer. - 46. Storm Drain Area Fee: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall pay the required Storm Drain Area fee, currently set at $2,650.00 per net acre, which is $833.00. 47. Grading and Drainage Plan:Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall conduct hydrology studies based on a ten-year storm frequency, prepare an engineered grading and drainage plan, and pay fees required to obtain necessary grading permits. Prior to occupancy, the design engineer shall provide written certification that the development has been built per the engineered grading and drainage plans. In addition, a plan review letter will be required of the Geotechnical engineer for the entire grading and drainage system which should • include but is not limited to a review of the subsurface of the non-compacted biotreatment material that may have potential for subsurface failure and surface failure due to vehicle loads. . Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Page 8 of 11 PLN2015-274 and PLN2015-275 - 95 E. Hamilton Avenue Site &Architectural Review Permit and Tree Removal Permit 48. Storm Water Information: On the grading plans show the amount, in square footage, of: a. Existing impervious area. b. Proposed impervious area. c. Proposed pervious area. . • 49. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Measures: Prior to issuance of any grading or • building permits, the applicant shall comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements, Santa Clara Valley Water District requirements, and the Campbell Municipal Code regarding stormwater pollution prevention. The primary objectives are to improve the quality and reduce the quantity of.stormwater runoff to the bay. Resources to achieve these objectives include Stormwater Best Management • Practices Handbook for New Development and Redevelopment ("CA BMP. Handbook") by the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA), 2003; Start at the Source: A Design Guidance Manual for Stormwater Quality Protection ("Start at the Source") by the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA), 1999; and Using Site Design Techniques to Meet Development Standards for Stormwater Quality: A Companion Document to Start at the Source ("Using Site Design Techniques") by BASMAA, 2003. The parking lot shall be constructed with materials approved by the Public Works Department and Community Development Department in consultation with the Arborist. A maintenance agreement and plan will be required so that City staff can make yearly inspections. 50. Street Tree Removal(s): To accommodate the required street scape plan, the existing Crape Myrtle street tree, will be removed as part of this project. Three (3) ash trees (e.g., evergreen ash or purple ash) will be installed as part of the streetscape plan. 51. Utilities: All on-site utilities shall be installed underground per Section 21.18.140 of the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings or additions. Applicant shall comply with all plan submittals, permitting, and fee requirements of the serving utility companies. Utility locations shall not cause damage to any existing street trees. Where there are utility conflicts due to established tree roots or where a new tree will be installed, alternate locations for utilities shall be explored. Include utility trench details where necessary. ti Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Page 9 of 11 PLN2015-274 and PLN2015-275 - 95 E. Hamilton Avenue Site &Architectural Review Permit and Tree Removal Permit 52. Water Meter(s) and Sewer Cleanout(s): Existing and proposed water meter(s) and sewer cleanout(s) shall be relocated or installed on private property behind the public right-of-way line. Sheet C-2 shows the (N) SCO in the public right-of-way. Also on Sheet C-2 a water meter is- shown to be on private property in the (N) driveway approach. Verify with SJW if this is an acceptable location. If not, the (N) water meter needs to be relocated elsewhere on the property. _ 53. Utility Coordination Plan: Prior to issuance of building permits for the site, the applicant shall submit a utility coordination plan and schedule for approval by the City Engineer for installation and/or abandonment of all utilities. The plan shall clearly show the location and size of all existing utilities and, the associated main lines; indicate which utilities and services are to remain; which utilities and services are to be abandoned, and where new utilities and services will be installed. Joint trenches for new utilities shall be used whenever possible. Sheet C-2 shows the replacement of a 4" lateral to a 6" lateral. Work directly with WVSD on details and design requirements. The Off-Site Civil plans will incorporate a dedicated sheet for WVSD design and details. Applicant will need to coordinate with WVSD during the plan check and review process. 54. Pavement Restoration: Based on the utility coordination plan, the applicant shall prepare a pavement restoration plan for approval by the City Engineer prior to any utility installation or abandonment. Streets that have been reconstructed or overlaid within the previous five years will require boring and jacking for all new utility installations. Hamilton Avenue'has not been reconstructed or overlaid in the last 5 years. The pavement restoration plan shall indicate how the street pavement shall be restored following the installation or abandonment of all utilities necessary for the project. Pavement restoration work will extend to the south side of E Hamilton Avenue and incorporate both the water lateral and sanitary sewer lateral to create one large rectangular restoration area. There will need to be a review of the traffic control plan and how this work will be accomplished during normal business hours. 55. Street Improvement Agreements / Plans / Encroachment Permit / Fees / Deposits: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, applicant shall execute a street improvement agreement, cause plans for public street improvements to be prepared by a registered civil engineer, pay various fees and deposits, post security and provide insurance necessary to obtain an encroachment permit for construction of the standard public street improvements, as required by the City Engineer. The plans shall include the following, unless otherwise approved . by the City Engineer: • Exhibit A- Conditions of Approval Page 10 of 11 PLN2015-274 and PLN2015-275 — 95 E. Hamilton Avenue Site &Architectural Review Permit and Tree Removal Permit • a. Show location of all existing utilities within'the new and existing public.right-of- way. b. Relocation of all existing utilities including utility boxes, covers, poles, etc. outside of sidewalk area. No utility,boxes, covers, etc. will be allowed in the 7' sidewalk area. c. Removal of existing driveway approaches and necessary sidewalk, curb and gutter. d. Removal of existing curb and gutter,existing sidewalk, driveway approaches and par strip, and install new city streetscape standard. e. Installation of a minimum of three (3) City approved street trees and irrigation at 40 feet on center. One tree will be located west of the new driveway; two will be located east of the two driveways. (There is a requirement for a 10' landscaped buffer behind private property fronting Hamilton Avenue). Park strip ground cover shall be.no mow (fine fescue and hair grass Deschampsia) turf with sub-surface drip irrigation such as Eco- Mats (or approved equal). f. This project is subject to the City's Streetscape Standards for Hamilton Avenue, which requires a 10 foot landscaped park strip with City approved street trees 40 feet on center, and a 7 foot sidewalk. g. Installation of asphalt concrete overlay per street pavement restoration plan for utility installation and/or abandonment, as required by the City Engineer. • .h. Installation of traffic control, stripes and signs. Should the, any striping work be cut due to utility trench work, the applicant will be required to restripe the entire street frontage and not just the areas that need replaced. • i. Construction of conforms to existing public and private improvements, as necessary. The sidewalks will need to conform at each end at a 90 degree angle with at least a minimum of 4' wide sidewalk to connect to the existing sidewalks. • This will be finalized .in the plan check review process. . . j. All existing utility.boxes and its covers, that will remain in the park strip will require readjustments and must be level to the sidewalk, or as required by the -City Engineer. k. Submit final plans in a digital format acceptable to the City. 56. Street Improvements Completed for Occupancy and Building Permit Final: Prior to • allowing occupancy and/or final building permit signoff for any and/or all buildings, the applicant shall have the required street improvements and pavement restoration installed and accepted by the City,, and the design engineer shall submit as-built drawings to the City. 57. Maintenance of Landscaping: Owner(s), current and future, are required to maintain the landscaped park strip and tree wells in the public right of way. This includes, but. is not limited to: trees, lawn, plantings, irrigation, etc. Trees shall not be pruned in a manner that would not allow the tree to grow to a mature height. I • Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Page 11 of 11 PLN2015-274 and PLN2015-275 - 95 E. Hamilton Avenue Site &Architectural Review Permit and Tree Removal Permit 58. Utility Encroachment Permit: Separate encroachment permits for the installation of utilities to serve the development will be required (including water, sewer, gas, electric, etc.). Applicant shall apply for and pay all necessary fees for utility permits for sanitary sewer, gas, water, electric and all other utility work. 59.Additional Street Improvements: Should it be discovered after the approval process that new utility main lines, extra utility work or other work is required to service the development, and- should those facilities or other work affect any public improvements, the City may add conditions to the development/project/permit, at the discretion of the City Engineer, to restore pavement or other public improvements to the satisfaction of the City. • • 60. Trash Enclosure Requirements: a. NPDES Permit No. CAS6 12008 (CRWQCB): C.3.a.i. (7): . . For all new development and redevelopment projects that are subject to the Permittee's planning, building, development, or other comparable review, but not regulated by Provision C.3, encourage the inclusion of adequate source control measures to limit pollutant generation, discharge, and runoff. • These source control measures should include covered trash, food waste, and compactor enclosures. b. Campbell Municipal Code 14.02.030 "Stormwater Pollution Control / Requirements". The code states that no pollutants or water containing pollutants can be discharged into the City's storm drain system. Trash enclosures contain pollutants. During a rain event (or during general cleaning) water washes over and into roofless enclosures, collecting pollutants and discharging to the City's storm drain system. Applicants are required to show how new trash enclosures will not discharge pollutants into the storm drain system. One possible method is • to provide a sanitary drain in the trash enclosure. c. West Valley Sanitation District (WVSD) the local sanitary sewer agency's . authority and standards: If a sanitary connection will be installed, WVSD requires a roof on the enclosure. . i .Y, Application for Building Permit Applicant:Fill in all applicable areas;please print clearly. Application Number: ` •---.156:2(0 - Intake Person(office use only) Applicant is: k Owner Contractor Architect/Designer gent: Project Identification: / APN: 27 q "27-oq/ Lot#: / Suite or Space#: Job Address: C�.5 EAS' }ca+M,(-i04 A\g., City: 6a,i4,4p 2,I\ State: Cilk Zip: 1CO08 Project Type (check appropriate item) Permit Type(s) (check appropriate items) / )(Commercial Residential _BLDG )( MECH X PLUMB ELEC Scope of Work ue - - - 9+oat - op-i-i-..f a LI.Volieil - - - - - -Valuation:$ ( )e2 apt Const..Type: V 6 Occupancy: Is Bldg.Sprinklered? Yes X No Existing Use: , Proposed Use Ai t 9 #of Stories: 2—. #of Units: Comm.Sq.Ftg.Office: j7�2— Retail: - Warehouse: Other: tt Res.Sq.Ftg. Total Sq.Ftg. Dwelling: Gar: #of cars Patio: Porch: Deck:143 0 Are you removing a street tree? Ye No. Are you doing any work in the public right of way? CINo I Owner's Name,Address,Phone 219'cif dafrta ja i GZ.C- Home Phone: 0./Or. 7/0 &72. 3 Address/f1/ 3. e a Cy`E4 4 - 33192- Bus. Phone: S � - Email`�44epli'ouw)2e405�'Guity is— OS �-fo S State C04- Zip Code 9 X030 Contractor's Name,Address,Phone&Contractor's Lic.# Check Here if"Owner/Builder"Permit Company Name c^.4 se,44 l' 2�. Bus Phone: Contact Name '5�Ed/ tild-2.0 Cell Phone: Address /0/ S. 5a//4... ./ Gni2- ,-Lie X33192 Cell. Phone: ms Email Sae.la 0 rinip 40,112620S-5"City C-0s State L2 Zip Code ?9.20F License#: `i r2 V ( License Classifications(s): A Architect " _ �c Designer _ Engineer (please check one) Name /Q24,Ge-i ,/ izekil Phone: a/ k/6 c ` It90(J Address / S0( /art„,: 317.4 //32? Bus. Phone: -g✓ Email City Gail (--,....t�e,vv State 1 Zip Code Desired contact person: Owner Contractor Architect/Designer Agent A41 �/i--t// F70 a S . S-2 2-( scant ignature Printed Name Date yc,-f AA OF'cAMu MEMORANDUM • '.'""•'" ! Community Development Department S � .��crinno Planning Division To: Building Division Date: December 4, 2017 From: Cindy McCormick, Senior Planner Subject: Planning Division Plan Check(Comment Letter#2) File No.: BLD2017-0569 —95 E. Hamilton The Planning Division has reviewed the above referenced building permit submittal for a new office building located at 95 E. Hamilton Ave. Based on a review of the building permit submittal and the Planning Commission's December 13, 2016 approval of a Site & Architectural Review Permit (PLN2015-274) and Tree Removal Permit(PLN2015-275), the following issue(s) must be addressed prior to Planning Division clearance for issuance of a Building Permit: PLAN REVISIONS 1. Tree Protection Plan: The applicant shall submit a Tree Protection Plan (embedded in the plan set) for review and approval by the Community Development Director in consultation with Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC, prior to building permit submittal. The Tree Protection Plan shall substantially comply with the recommendations of the Monarch Consulting Arborist Report, or as may be amended by the Community Development Director. NOTE: Sheets A206 and A207 do not satisfy this plan check comment. Please work with the consulting Arborist, Richard Gessner from Monarch Consulting, to prepare an appropriate Tree Protection Plan. The Tree Protection Plan shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of a building permit. One approved, the Tree Protection Plan shall be inserted into the building plan set(24"x36"). Please also replace the "tree report" on page A207 with the Monarch Consulting Arborist Report (pages 17 through 27 and pages 34 through 37) that was provided to you with the June 19th plan check letter. 2. Parking Lot Design and Construction: The parking lot shall be designed and constructed to minimize aeration deficit (compaction) and water deficit (dehydration) to the greatest extent feasible. The design of the parking lot shall substantially comply with the recommendations of the Monarch Consulting Arborist Report, or as may be amended by the Community Development in consultation with Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC. NOTE: Simply stating,that "the parking lot design will comply..." does not satisfy this plan check comment. Please work with the consulting Arborist, Richard Gessner from Monarch Consulting, to prepare an appropriate parking lot design. This plan shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of a building permit.• N.T _ 70 North First Street•Campbell,CA 95008-1423•,TEL(408)866-2140•FAX(408)866-5140•E-MAIL planning@cityofcampbellcom 3. Revised Plans to be submitted and approved: The applicant shall submit revised plans (site plan, grading and drainage plans, etc.) that substantially comply with the approved Tree Protection Plan (yet to be approved) and shall include sufficient detail (e.g., materials, construction methods, etc.) to determine that trees will be adequately protected. NOTE: Please work with the consulting Arborist, Richard Gessner from Monarch Consulting, to prepare appropriate grading and drainage plans. It is highly recommended that you coordinate with both the consulting arborist and the Public Works Department to ensure everyone's comments are addressed. 4. Pre-Construction Meeting with Arborist: Prior to beginning work, all contractors involved with the project shall attend a pre-construction meeting Richard Gessner from Monarch Consulting to review the tree protection guidelines. NOTE: The project planner, Cindy McCormick, shall attend the pre-construction meeting along with Richard Gessner. If you have any questions pertaining to these comments, please do not hesitate to give me a call or email for clarification. PROJECT PLANNER CONTACT: Cindy McCormick, Senior Planner (408) 871-5103; cindym(a,,cityofcampbell.com COPY: Paul Kermoyan, Community Development Director Doris C. Quai Hoi, Public Works Department Richard Gessner, Monarch Consulting 70 North First Street•Campbell,CA 95008-1423•TEL(408)866-2140•FAX(408)866-5140•E-MAIL,planning@cityofcampbell.com PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT LAND DEVELOPMENT Effective July 1,2017 TO: Finance PUBLIC WORKS FILE NO. ENC2017-289 • - PROPERTY ADDRESS 95 E Hamilton Avenue Please collect&receipt for the following monies: ACCT. .I ITEM ' AMOUNT LAND DEVELOPMENT 4722 Encroachment Permit Application Fee Non-Utility Encroachment Permit Major 410,000 $425.00 Paid $ Minor Encroachment Permit<$10,000 $240.00 Initial R-1 Permit N/C Subsequent R-1 Permits within Two Year Period $240.00 Inspection Fee Minimum Charge per Location $420.00 Street Tree Planting/Removal N/C 2203 ($500 per Tree Planting Deposit Required) $500.00/tree 2203 Plan Check Deposit 2%of Engineer's Estimate $500.00 min Paid $ Utility and R-1 Permits no deposit required 4722 Grading&Drainage Plan Review Single Family Lot $295.00 Site< 10,000 s.f. $885.00 Site≥10,000 s.f.<0.5 Acre $1,185.00 Paid $ Site≥0.5 Acre '$1,772.00 4722 NPDES Review(C3 Requirements) ' For projects not required to submit numeric sizing $175.00 Paid $ _ - For projects required to submit numeric sizing Impervious Area 10,000 Sq. Ft to 1 Acre $740.00 Impervious Area 1 Acre or more $965.00 4722 For projects sent to Consultant for review Consultant Cost+20% 4722 Additional treatment facilities $315 ea Plan Check&Inspection Fee(Non-Utility) 4722 Engr. Est. <$250,000 14%of Engineer's Estimate $ 7,140.00 4722 Engr. Est.≥$250,000 and≤$500,000 $35,000.00+8%of Engineers Estimate 4722 Engr. Est. >$500,000 $55,000.00+7%of Engineers Estimate 2203 Emergency Cash Deposit 4%of Engr. Est.*($500 min/$10,000 Max) $ 2,040.00 2203 Faithful Performance Security(FPS) 100%of ENGR. EST.* $ 51,000.00 2203 Labor and Materials Security 100%of ENGR. EST.* 4721 Storm Drainage Area Fee Per Acre R-1 $2,120.00 (Multi-Res$2,385.00) (All Other$2,650.00) - $ 833.00 • 4722 Parcel Map(4 Lots or Less) - $4,200.00+$90/lot 4722 Final Tract Map(5 or More Lots) $5,115.00+$124/lot 2203 Monumentation Security. 100%of City's Monumentation Estimate 4920 Parkland Dedication Fee(75%/25%Due Upon Cert.of Occupancy) 4722 Lot Line Adjustment(Includes Certificate of Compliance) ' $1,990.00 4722 Vacation of Public Streets&Easements $2,700.00 4722 Certificate of Compliance $1,970.00 - • 4722 Certificate of Correction $590.00 4722 Documenf Recording Fees $15.00/first page$3 ea.Additional 4722 Private Improvement in Public ROW $100.00 4722 Approved Plan Revision Fee $100/sheet 4722 Appeal Filing Fee $200.00 730.4924 Notice of Improvement Obligation Payment 4/22 Assessment Segregation or Reapportionment First Split $940.00 Each Additional Lot $295.00 511.7424 Postage MISCELLANEOUS Other(Please Specify) *Engineer's Estimate shall be as approved by the City Engineer and shall include all items of work. TOTAL $ 61,013.00 NAME OF APPLICANT Ali Abiani, MFA Engineers and Associates NAME OF PAYOR PHONE ADDRESS ZIP FOR RECEIVED BY CITY CLERK ONLY Date ' Receipt# • J:LLandDavM Ia,,Check(.acmente\1.Specnic Vrgeccs Active Vrgsc,nPrcgressWamiltan Ace A9S\feesVnvare tlalance - - CITY OF CAMPBELL ENCROACHMENT PERMIT Permit No.: ENC2017-2$9 DEPT.OF PUBLIC WORKS (for working within the X-Ref. File • public right-of-way) 12/14/17 70 North First Street g Application Date Campbell,CA 95008 Issued Application Expiration Date 6/14/17 Ph.(408)866-2150 APN 279-27-096 Fx. (408)376-0958 Permit Expiration Date APPLICATION-Application is hereby made fora Public Works Permitin accordance with Campbell Municipal Code,Section 11.04.(Application expires in six (6) months if the permit is not issued. Application Fee is non-refundable.) A. Work Address: 95 E HAMILTON AVENUE Nature of Work/Utility BLVD STREETSCAPE STANDARDS; 10'PARKSTRIP, 7'S/W; STREET TREES B. Trench Location: ADA DRIVEWAY O No Fee Permit for work related to City Project Project Name: C. Attach four(4)copies of an engineered plan showing the location and extent of the work, and four(4)copies of the preliminary Engineer's Estimate of work. The plans shall show the relation of the proposed work to existing surface and underground improvements. When approved by the City Engineer,said plan becomes a part of this permit. D. All work shall conform to the City of Campbell Standard Specifications and Details for Public Works Construction;the General Permit Conditions listed on the reverse side;and the Special Provisions for this permit,listed below.Failure to abide by these conditions and provisions may result in job shutdown and/or forfeiture of Faithful Performance Sureties and cash deposits. E. The Contractor must have this permit and approved plans at the site and must notify the Public Works Department at least two days before starting work. Notice must be given to Public Works at least 24 hours before restarting any work. • Name of Applicant: 5} Telephone: I/ 710 672 c Address: 10i Sc `2a, CC(4, y ie .33t'LZ LoS6744va `'J ©�(] • E-Mail Address_ Sam -)1 rim Ad zzeo e,73-.S owsL 24-HOUR EMERGENCY PHONE NUMBER: d'ae)710 O72 Is this work being done by the property owners at their own residence? Yes No / The Applicant/Permittee hereby agrees by affixing their signature to this permit to hold the City of Campbell, its officers,agents,and employees free,safe and harmless from any claim or demand for damages resulting from the work covered by this permit. The Applicant/Permittee hereby acknowledges that they have read and understand both the front and back of this permit, and they will inform their contractor(s) of the information.Applicant is advised that upon issuance of this permit, property owner, or property owner's successors, shall be responsible for any and all damages arising out l-off�improvements completed in the ublic right-of-wa . es Accepted: //k Lk( 1 6 V pri 5-2-D 71 (Applicant Permittee) (" ) Date Ark Flo2 - 6---2o -tee (Contractor) Prin ame) Date SPECIAL PROVISIONS: 1. Street shall not be open cutfor underground installations.Minimum cuts may be allowed for connections orexploration holes.Such cuts may be specifically approved by the Inspector prior to rutting. 2. Pavement may be cut for underground installations and must be restored in accordance with the Standard Details Trench Restoration Method "A",unless otherwise approved by the Engineer. 3. Work to be staked by a licensed Land Surveyor or Civil Engineer and two(2)copies of the cut sheets sent to the Public Works Department before starting work. 4. Per Section 4216 of the Government Code this permit is not valid for excavations until Underground Service Alert(USA)has been notified and the inquiry identification number has been entered hereon. USA Phone: 1-800-227-2600. USA TICKET NO. 5. Prior to any work,the property owner shall execute an Agreement for Private Improvements in the Public Right-of-Way,which shall be recorded. 6. Public Notification Requirements: • 7. SEE PUBLIC WORKS FEE SCHEDULE FOR CURRENT FEES AM �J T RECEIPT ND, PERMIT APPLICATION FEE $ LLD PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT $ S()() 7 7 2,0't" SECURITY FOR FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE/LABOR&MATERIALS $ - CONSTRUCTION CASH DEPOSIT $ PLAN CHECK&INSPECTION FEE $ _ EMERGENCY PERMIT FEE $ APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE • - ForCityEngineer Date Permit Expires 12 Months After Date of Issuance • GENERAL PERMIT CONDITIONS 1. The Permittee must provide evidence of insurance and Additional Insured Endorsements as required by the City.Insurance shall be maintained for the duration of the permit work. 2. A Construction Cash Deposit is required.Changes will be made against this deposit if there is an emergency call-out,overtime inspection or when City ordered barricading is required.Any such costs in excess of the deposit will be billed to the Permittee. 3. Refund of the construction cash deposit balance and refund or cancellation of the Faithful Performance Surety will be initiated by the written acceptance of the work by the City. 4. A one-year maintenance period and surety are required.Such period will begin on date of written acceptance by the City.Surety posted shall be equal to 25%of the original Faithful Performance Security. - 5. Submit project schedule 10(ten)days prior to proposed start of work.Additional lead time may be required for work within City facilities and downtown Campbell. 6. The Permittee must request in writing a final inspection and acceptance of the work upon completion.Acceptance by the City will be made in writing to the Permittee. 7. Maintain safe pedestrian and vehicular crossings and free access to private driveways,bus stops,fire hydrants,and water valves. 8. A Construction Traffic Control Plan and a Construction Schedule are required for all lane closures,detours,and street closures.This plan must be reviewed and approved prior to any lane closures. - 9. A Construction Traffic Control Plan shall conform to the most recent version of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices(MUTCD). 10. Replace,as directed by the City Engineer,any damaged or removed improvements in accordance with City Standards and Specifications at the sole expense of the Permittee as expeditiously as possible. 11. -Sawcut for all PCC or AC removals.All PCC removals shall be to the nearest scoremark and new PCC shall be doweled to existing improvements. 12. Prior approval of inspector is required for any work proposed after normal working hours,on weekends or holidays and may require reimbursement of inspection costs at the current overtime rate. 13. Work on arterials and collectors may require the use of changeable message boards.Adequate signing and barricading is required on the job site.Failure to provide such signing and barricading may result in the City's providing signing and barricades and charging the cost(Including all labor and materials)against the construction • cash deposit. - 14. Compaction testing of subgrade,base rock,and asphalt concrete by Permittee is required unless otherwise stated by the City Engineer. 15. The Contractor or Permittee will have a supervisory representative available for contact on the project at all times during construction.Contractor or Permittee shall provide a phone number at which they can be contacted outside the hours of 8:00 a.m.to 4:00 p.m.and on weekends. 16. No storage of materials or equipment will be allowed near the edge of the pavement,the traveled way,or within the shoulderline which would create a hazardous condition to the public. 17. This permit shall not be construed as authorization for excavation and grading on private property adjacent to the work or any other work for which a separate permit may be required,nor does it relieve the Permittee of any obligation to obtain any other permit required by law. 18. This permit does not release the Permittee from any liabilities contained in other agreements or contracts with the City and any other public agency. - 19. This permit is not transferable.Work must be performed by the Permittee or his designated agent or contractor as specified thereon. 20. Call back(call out)due to emergencies regarding this permit shall be at the current overtime rate with a three(3)hour minimum charge per occurrence. 21. Pursuant to Chapter 14.02 of the Campbell Municipal Code,applicant shall not cause to be discharged any material into the municipal storm drain system other than storm water.Applicant shall adhere to the BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES established by the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program. • 22. If the public interest requires a modification of,or a departure from the permit,plans,special provisions and/or specifications,the City shall have the authority to require or approve any modification or departure and to specify the manner in which the same is to be made. . 23. Permittee must provide advance notification to all parties that maybe affected by the permit activities.Notification shall be reviewed by the City prior to distribution and include dates of work and a contact name and a phone number. 24. Applicant shall remove water from utility vaults in accordance with the requirements of State Water Resources Control Board Water Quality Order WQ 2014-0174- DWQ. Said vault water shall not be discharged into the City of Campbell's storm drain system. See http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water issues/programs/npdes/utilityvaults.shtml for more information. Applicant is hereby respon for ensuring th al hose providing services under the applicant are aware of and abide by all of the above conditions. 5--2/0-1? Applicant, Date: 9/1-14 l Fioi2 S 5 Contractor (Print Name) Date: J:\FORMS\Templates\Encroachment Permits\Encroachment Permit STATIC form2.pdf Rev.02/18 CITY OF CAMPBELL ENCROACHMENT PERMIT Permit No.: ENC2017-289 DEPT.OF PUBLIC WORKS (for working within the X-Ref. File - 70 North First Street public right-of-way) Application Date 12/14/17 Campbell,CA 95008 6/14/17 Ph.(408)866-2150 Issued Application Expiration Date Fx. (408)376-0958 APN 279-27-096 Permit Expiration Date APPLICATION-Application is hereby made fora Public Works Permitin accordance with Campbell Municipal Code,Section 11.04.(Application expires in six (6) months ifthe•permit is not issued. Application Fee is non-refundable.) A. WorkAddress: 95 E HAMILTON AVENUE - Nature of Work/Utility BLVD STREETSCAPE STANDARDS; 10'PARKSTRIP, 7'S/W; STREET TREES B Trench Location: ADA DRIVEWAY O No Fee Permit for work related to City Project Project Name: C. Attach four(4)copies of an engineered plan showing the location and extent of the work,and four(4)copies of the preliminary Engineer's Estimate of work. The plans shall show the relation of the proposed work to existing surface and underground improvements. When approved by the City Engineer,said plan becomes a part of this permit. D. All work shal I conform to the City of CampbeliStandard Specifications and Details for Public Works Construction;the General Permit Conditions listed on the reverse side;and the Special Provisions for this permit,listed below.Failure to abide by these conditions and provisions may result - injobshutdownand/orforfeiture of Faithful Performance Sureties and cash deposits. • E. The Contractor must have this permit and approved plans at the site and must notify the Public Works Department at least two days before - starting work. Notice must be given to Public Works at least 24 hours before restarting any work. - Name of Applicant: ALI ABIANI Telephone: 408=509=3461 Address: 370 GRAND PARK CIR, SAN JOSE, CA 95136 E-Mail Address: ALIABIANI@SBCGLOBAL.NET 24-HOUR EMERGENCY PHONE NUMBER: • Is this work being done by the property owners at their own residence? ri Yes n No The Applicant/Permittee hereby agrees by affixing their signature to this permit to hold the City of Campbell,its officers,agents,and employees free,safe and harmless from any claim or demand for damages resulting from the work covered by this permit. -The Applicant/Permittee hereby acknowledges that they have read and understand both the front and back of this permit, and they will inform their contractor(s) of the information.Applicant is advised that upon issuance of this permit, property owner, or property owner's successors, shall be responsible for any and all damages arising out of improvements completed in the public right-of-way. Accepted: (Applicant Permittee) (sign) Date (Contractor) (Print Name) Date SPECIAL PROVISIONS: 1. Street shall not be open cut for underground installations.Minimum cuts may be allowed for connections orexploration holes.Such cuts may be cperifirally apprnveri by the Inspertnr prier to rutting. 2. Pavement may be cut for underground installations and must be restored in accordance with the Standard Details Trench Restoration Method "A",unless otherwise approved by the Engineer. 3. Work to be staked by a licensed Land Surveyor or Civil Engineer and two(2)copies of the cut sheets sent to the Public Works Department before starting work. - 4. Per Section 4216 of the Government Code this permit is not valid for excavations until Underground Service Alert(USA)has been notified and the inquiry identification number has been entered hereon. USA Phone: 1-800-227-2600. USA TICKET NO. 5. Prior to any work,the property owner shall execute an Agreement for Private Improvements in the Public Right-of-Way,which shall be recorded. 6. Public Notification Requirements: 7. SEE PUBLIC WORKS FEE SCHEDULE FOR CURRENT FEES AMQ ,NT RECEIPT NO. - PERMIT APPLICATION FEE $ 1 - PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT $_300 ' SECURITY FOR FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE/LABOR&MATERIALS $ CONSTRUCTION CASH DEPOSIT $ PLAN CHECK&INSPECTION FEE $ EMERGENCY PERMIT FEE $ • • APPROVED FOR ISSUANCE For City Engineer Date Permit Expires 12 Months After Date of Issuance • GENERAL PERMIT CONDITIONS 1. The Permittee must provide evidence of insurance and Additional Insured Endorsements as required by the City.Insurance shall be maintained for the duration of the permit work. - 2. A Construction Cash Deposit is required.Changes will be made against this deposit if there is an emergency call-out,overtime inspection or when City ordered barricading is required.Any such costs in excess of the deposit will be billed to the Permittee. 3. Refund of the construction cash deposit balance and refund or cancellation of the Faithful Performance Surety will be initiated by the written acceptance of the work by the City. - 4. A one-year maintenance period and surety are required.Such period will begin on date of written acceptance by the City.Surety posted shall be equal to 25%of the original Faithful Performance Security. _ 5. Submit project schedule 10(ten)days prior to proposed start of work.Additional lead time may be required for work within City facilities and downtown Campbell. 6. The Permittee must request in writing a final inspection and acceptance of the work upon completion.Acceptance by the City will be made in writing to the Permittee. -7. Maintain safe pedestrian and vehicular crossings and free access to private driveways,bus stops,fire hydrants,and water valves. • 8. A Construction Traffic Control Plan and a Construction Schedule are required for all lane closures,detours,and street closures.This plan must be reviewed and approved prior to any lane closures. 9. A Construction Traffic Control Plan shall conform to the most recent version of the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices(MUTCD). 10. Replace,as directed by the City Engineer,any damaged or removed improvements in accordance with City Standards and Specifications at the sole expense of the Permittee as expeditiously as possible. 11. Sawcut for all PCC or AC removals.All PCC removals shall be to the nearest scoremark and new PCC shall be doweled to existing improvements. 12. Prior approval of inspector is required for any work proposed after normal working hours,on weekends or holidays and may require reimbursement of inspection costs at the current overtime rate. - 13. Work on arterials and collectors may require the use of changeable message boards.Adequate signing and barricading is required on the job site.Failure to provide such signing and barricading may result in the City's providing signing and barricades and charging the cost(including all labor arid materials)against the construction cash deposit. 14. Compaction testing of subgrade,base rock,and asphalt concrete by Permittee is required unless otherwise stated by the City Engineer. 15. The Contractor or Permittee will have a supervisory representative available for contact on the project at all times during construction.Contractor or Permittee shall provide a phone number at which they can be contacted outside the hours of 8:00 a.m.to 4:00 p.m.add on weekends. 16. No storage of materials or equipment will be allowed near the edge of the pavement,the traveled way,or within the shoulderline which would create a hazardous condition to the public. 17. This permit shall not be construed as authorization for excavation and grading on private property adjacent to the work or any other work for which a separate permit may be required,nor does it relieve the Permittee of any obligation to obtain any other permit required by law. 18. This permit does not release the Permittee from any liabilities contained in other agreements or contracts with the City and any other public agency. 19. This permit is not transferable.Work must be performed by the Permittee or his designated agent or contractor as specified thereon. 20. Call back(call out)due to emergencies regarding this permit shall beat the current overtime rate with a three(3)hour minimum charge per occurrence. 21. Pursuant to Chapter 14.02 of the Campbell Municipal Code,applicant shall not cause to be discharged any material into the municipal storm drain system other than storm water.Applicant shall adhere to the BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES established by the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program. 22. If the public interest requires a modification of,or a departure from the permit,plans,special provisions and/or specifications,the City shall have the authority to require or approve any modification or departure and to specify the manner in which the same is to be made. 23. Permittee must provide advance notification to all parties that may be affected by the permit activities.Notification shall be reviewed by the City prior to distribution and include dates of work and a contact name and a phone number. 24. Applicant shall remove water from utility vaults in accordance with the requirements of State Water Resources Control Board Water Quality Order WQ 2014-0174- DWQ. Said vault water shall not be discharged into the City of Campbell's storm drain system. " See http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water issues/programs/npdes/utilityvaults.shtml for more information. Applicant is hereby responsible for ensuring that all those providing services under the applicant are aware of and abide by all of the above conditions. • Applicant • _ Date: Contractor (Print Name) Date: • J:\FORMS\Templates\Encroachment Permits\Encroachment Permit STATIC form2.pdf Rev.02/18 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT LAND DEVELOPMENT Effective July 1,2017 TO: Finance PUBLIC WORKS FILE NO. ENC2017-289 PROPERTY ADDRESS 95 E Hamilton Avenue Please collect&receipt for the following monies: ACCT. ITEM I AMOUNT LAND DEVELOPMENT 4722 Encroachment Permit Application Fee Non-Utility Encroachment Permit Major≥$10,000 - $425.00 Paid $Minor Encroachment Permit<$10,000 $240.00 Initial R-1 Permit N/C Subsequent R-1 Permits within Two Year Period $240.00 Inspection Fee Minimum Charge per Location $420.00 Street Tree Planting/Removal N/C 2203 ($500 per Tree Planting Deposit Required) $500.00/tree 2203 Plan Check Deposit 2%of Engineer's Estimate $500.00 min Paid $ Utility and R-1 Permits no deposit required 4722 Grading&Drainage Plan Review Single Family Lot $295.00 Site< 10,000 s.f. $885.00 Site≥10,000 s.f.<0.5 Acre $1,185.00 Paid $ Site≥0.5 Acre $1,772.00 4722 NPDES Review(C3 Requirements) For projects not required to submit numeric sizing $175.00 Paid $ For projects required to submit numeric sizing Impervious Area 10,000 Sq. Ft to 1 Acre $740.00 565 Impervious Area 1 Acre or more $965.00 4722 For projects sent to Consultant for review Consultant Cost+20% - 4722 Additional treatment facilities • $315 ea • . Plan Check& Inspection Fee(Non-Utility) 4722 - Engr. Est. <$250,000 14%of Engineer's Estimate $ 7,140.00 4722 Engr. Est.≥$250,000 and≤$500,000 $35,000.00+8%of Engineers Estimate 4722 Engr. Est. >$500,000 - $55,000.00+7%of Engineers Estimate 2203 Emergency Cash Deposit 4%of Engr. Est.*($500 min/$10,000 Max) $ 2,040.00 2203 Faithful Performance Security(FPS) 100%of ENGR. EST.* $ 51,000.00 - 2203 Labor and Materials Security • 100%of ENGR. EST.* 4721 Storm Drainage Area Fee Per Acre R-1 $2,120.00 (Multi-Res$2,385.00) (All Other$2,650.00) $ 883.00 4722 Parcel Map(4 Lots or Less) $4,200.00+$90/lot 4722 Final Tract Map(5 or More Lots) $5,115.00+$124/lot 2203 Monumentation Security 100%of City's Monumentation Estimate 4920 Parkland Dedication Fee(75%/25% Due Upon Cert.of Occupancy) 4722 Lot Line Adjustment(Includes Certificate of Compliance) $1,990.00 4722 Vacation of Public Streets&Easements $2,700.00 4722 Certificate of Compliance $1,970.00 4722 Certificate of Correction $590.00 4722 Document Recording Fees $15.00/first page$3 ea.Additional 4722 Private Improvement in Public ROW $100.00 4722 Approved Plan Revision Fee $100/sheet 4722 Appeal Filing Fee $200.00 730.4924 Notice of Improvement Obligation Payment -4722 Assessment Segregation or Reapportionment First Split $940.00 • Each Additional Lot $295.00 511.7424 Postage MISCELLANEOUS Other(Please Specify) *Engineer's Estimate shall be as approved by the City Engineer and shall include all items of work. TOTAL $ 61,628.00 NAME OF APPLICANT Ali Abiani, MFA Engineers and Associates • NAME OF PAYOR PHONE ADDRESS ZIP FOR RECEIVED BY CITY CLERK ONLY Date Receipt# J:\t.andDe%Plan Check t:cmments\i-Spechc Protects-Acfve!'rgect,n Progress\Ham,llon Ave t 9khees\Invoice balance — , TO BE RECORDED WITHOUT FEE SECTION 6103 GOVERNMENT CODE 239 5567 AT THE REQUEST OF Cn'Y OF CAMPBELL Regina Alcemendras Clerk-Recorder Santa Clara County Recording Requested by: ) 07/13/2018 08:20 AM ) CONFORMED COPY City of Campbell ) Copy of document recorded. Has not been compared with original. When recorded mail to: ) ) City Clerk ) City of Campbell ) 70 North First Street ) Campbell,CA 95008 ) APN: 279-27-096 (Space above this line for Recorder's use only.) ADDRESS:95 E Hamilton Avenue,Campbell,CA 95008 STREET IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS THIS AGREEMENT, identified by File No(s). ENC2017-289 is entered into this day of , 2018, by and between 95 HAMILTON LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, hereunder referred to as "Owner," and the CITY OF CAMPBELL, a municipal corporation of the County of Santa Clara, State of California,hereinafter referred to as "City." On December 13th, 2016 the Planning Commission granted conditional approval of a New Commercial Building, for that certain real property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated as though fully set forth herein, and commonly known as 95 E. Hamilton Avenue, which property is hereinafter referred to as "said real property." TERMS AND CONDITIONS Now, therefore, in consideration of the above referenced approvals, and in satisfaction thereof, the parties to this Agreement shall comply with the following terms and conditions: (1) The Owner shall provide, construct and install at his/her own proper cost and expense, street improvements as described in Section 11.24.040 of the City Code within 12 months from the date first mentioned hereinabove; provided, however, that in the computation of said 12 month period, delays due to, or caused by acts of God, viz., unusually inclement weather, major strikes, and other delays beyond the control of the Owner or his/her successors shall be excluded. (2) If the Owner fails to complete the work required by this Agreement within the said 12 month period, the City, after giving ten (10) days written notice to the Owner, or his/her successors, may construct and/or install said improvements and recover the full cost and expense from the Owner, or his/her successors. STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS (3) The Owner, shall cause to be prepared at his/her cost and expense street improvement plans for the construction and installation of said improvementsprior to such construction or installation. Said plans shall be prepared by a civil engineer registered by the State of California and submitted to the City Engineer for examination and approval. (4) All of said improvements embraced in this Agreement shall be constructed and installed in accordance with the plans approved by the City Engineer and shall be made under the inspection and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Said construction and/or installation shall be in accordance with the existing ordinances and resolutions of the City of Campbell and all applicable plans, specifications, standards, sizes, lines and grades approved by the City Engineer, and all State and County statutes. Upon completion and acceptance of the improvements by the City, the Owner, shall provide reproducible as- built plans to the City Engineer. PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION FEE (5) Prior to approval of the plans by the City Engineer pursuant to Section (3) of this Agreement, Owner, or his/her successors, shall pay the City for plan checking of improvement plans, field inspection of construction of improvements and all necessary expenses incurred by City in connection with said improvements, a sum calculated in accordance with Resolution No.-10494 as adopted by the City Council on May 3, 2005, or as may subsequently be adopted by the City Council. FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY (6) The Owner, or his/her successors, shall file with City, prior to beginning construction, security acceptable to the City in amount equal to the City Engineer's estimated cost of the street improvements to ensure full and faithful performance of the construction of all the aforementioned improvement work. Said security shall guarantee that Owner, and his/her successors, will correct any defects which may appear in said improvement work within one (1) year from the date of acceptance of the work by City and pay for any damage to other work resulting from the construction thereof, as well as pay the cost of all labor and materials involved. This security shall remain in effect until one (1) year after date of final acceptance of said improvements by City. Said security amount may be reduced by the City Engineer in his/her sole discretion after the date of final acceptance to not less than twenty-five(25)percent of its full value. (7) Upon final release of said security by City, the obligations of Owner, and his/her successors, contained in this Agreement shall be considered null and void, except as otherwise provided by applicable law, or Sections 12 or 13 of this Agreement. FORMATION OF A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT (8) The Owner, when called upon by City to do so, shall execute a petition for the formation of any special assessment district created pursuant to any special assessment act as provided in the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California created for the purpose of constructing and/or installing any or all of said improvements. Owner, or his/her successors, shall participate in and become a part of any special assessment district as described in Section (8) of this Agreement. 2 (9) The Owner's, or his/her successors' obligations contained in this Agreement that are accomplished to the satisfaction of said City Engineer by said special assessment district shall be considered to satisfy those obligations. RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION (10) Owner at his/her own cost and expense, shall acquire any easement and right-of-way within or without said real property necessary for the completion of the improvements shown upon aforesaid improvement plans. It is provided, however, that in the event eminent domain proceedings are required for the purpose of securing said easement and right-of-way, Owner, shall deposit or cause to be deposited with City a sum covering the reasonable market value of the land proposed to be taken and to be included in said sum shall be a reasonable allowance for severance damages, if any. It is further provided that in addition thereto such sums as may be required for legal fees and costs, engineering and other incidental costs shall be deposited with the City. (11) The Owner, shall carry out any and all negotiations with all interested parties and shall perform or cause to be performed at his/her own cost and expense and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer any and all work required to abandon, remove, raise, lower, relocate and otherwise modify irrigation lines within or without the boundary of said real property. INDEMNITY AND INSURANCE (12) The Owner, and his/her successors, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall indemnify, defend and hold the City of Campbell, its agents, employees, attorneys, officers, officials and assignees harmless from any and all claims, actions, causes of action, liabilities, damages, losses and expenses, including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees, arising out of, or resulting from, or alleged to arise out of or result from any negligent or intentional act or omission (including misconduct) of said Owner, or his/her successors, or any subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by him, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable in the course of performance of the Agreement, except for any claims, actions, causes of,action, liabilities, damages, losses and expenses proximately caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. (13) The Owner, and his/her successors, shall also indemnify, defend and hold the City of Campbell, its agents, attorneys, employees, officers, officials, and assignees harmless against and from any and all claims, actions, causes of action, liabilities, demands, losses, lawsuits, judgments, damages, costs and expenses (including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees and court costs, whether incurred at trial, appellate or administrative levels) which the City of Campbell may incur or suffer, or to which the City of Campbell may be subjected resulting from, or alleged to result from the failure of Owner, or his/her heirs, assignees, successors, grantees, agents, employees, subcontractors, or anyone performing services under him, to fulfill any of the obligations imposed under this Agreement, except for any claims, actions, causes of action, liabilities, judgments, damages, costs and expenses proximately caused by the sole negligence or willful 3 misconduct of the City. (14) The Owner and his/her successors shall also indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employees to attach, set aside, void or annul an approval of the City, its City Council, Planning Commission, Community Development Director, Public Works Director, Building Official, City Engineer, or other such City -official concerning a subdivision, which action is brought within the time period provided for in CaliforniaGovernment Code Section 66499.37. (15) In the event that this contract is subject to California Civil Code section 2782(b), the foregoing indemnity provisions shall not apply to any liability for the active negligence of the City. The foregoing indemnity provisions are intended to fully allocate all risk of liability to third-parties. No other rights of indemnity or contribution shall exist between the parties in law or in equity. The provisions set forth in this section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. (16) The City will promptly notify the Owner of any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval concerning a subdivision of said real property, and will cooperate fully in the defense. (17) Owner and his/her/its successors shall maintain insurance for injuries to persons or damage to property conforming to the following specifications: A. Minimum Scope of Insurance Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1. Insurance Services Office(ISO) CGL form CG 00 01 11 85; and 2. ISO form G0009 11 88 Owners and Contractors Protective Liability Coverage Form—Coverage for Operations of Designated Contractor; and 3. Course of Construction Insurance covering all risks of loss; and 4. ISO CA 00 01 06 92 including symbol 1 (Any Auto); and 5. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employer's Liability insurance. B. Minimum Limits of Insurance Owner shall maintain limits no less than: 1. General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required 4 occurrence limit. - 2. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employer's Liability limits of$1,000,000 per accident. It is a requirement of this Agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than or in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits set forth in this Agreement shall be available to the City as an additional insured. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be(1)the minimum coverage limits specified in this Agreement, or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured, whichever affords greater coverage. The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of City(as agreed to in this'Agreement) before the City's own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. C. Deductible and Self-Insured Retention Any deductibles or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retention as respects the City, its agents, officers, attorneys, employees, officials and volunteers; or the Owner shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses related to investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses. D. Other Insurance Provisions The policies are to contain,or be endorsed to contain,the following provisions: 1. General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverage: a. The City, its agents, officers, attorneys, employees, officials and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities related to this Agreement performed by or on behalf of the Owner, products and completed operations of the Owner, premises owned, occupied or used by the Owner, or automobiles owned, leased,hired or borrowed by the Owner. b. The Owner's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its agents, officers, attorneys, employees, officials and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its agents, officers, attorneys, employees, officials and volunteers shall be excess of the Owner's insurance 5 and shall not contribute with it. c. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its agents, officers, attorneys, employees, officials, and volunteers. d. The Owner's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. e. Coverage shall not extend to any indemnity coverage for the active negligence of the City in any case where an agreement to indemnify the City would be invalid under Subdivision (b) of Section 2782 of the California Civil Code. 2. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Coverage: The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its agents, officers, attorneys, employees, officials, and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the Owner for the City. 3. Course of Construction Coverage: Course of Construction policies shall contain the following provisions: (a) the City shall be named as loss payee; and (b) the insurer shall waive all rights of subrogation against the City. 4. All Coverages: Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. E. Acceptability of Insurers Without limiting Owner's indemnification provided hereunder, Owner shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this contract, up to the date of acceptance of the work by the City, the policies of insurance listed in Paragraphs 12 through 16 of this Agreement. Insurance is to be issued by an issuer with a current A.M. Best Rating of A:VII and be authorized to transact business in the State of California, unless otherwise approved by the City. F. Verification of Coverage Owner shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance evidencing coverage required by this clause. The certificates for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates are to be on forms provided by the City. Where by statue, the City Workers' Compensation related forms cannot be used, equivalent forms approved by the Insurance Commissioner are to be substituted. All certificates are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. G. Subcontractors 6 Owner shall include all subcontractors as insured under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates by each subcontractor. All coverage shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein. MUTUAL BENEF'I'1 COVENANTS BINDING ON HEIRS, ASSIGNEES, SUCCESSORS, AND GRANTEES OF OWNER (18) It is, acknowledged that the provisions of this Agreement constitute covenants for the improvement of the subject real property for the mutual benefit of Owner's property, commonly known as 95 E. Hamilton Avenue, and the City's property, commonly described as E. Hamilton Avenue where it adjoins Owner's property. These covenants shall be considered to affect rights in the above-described real properties, and shall be binding on the heirs, assignees, successors, grantees and agents of the Owner to said real property. UNVESTED INTERESTS (19) Nothing contained herein shall be construed to transfer any unvested interests in real or personal property for purposes of the rule against perpetuities. BREACH OF CONTRACT (20) The City, upon breach any of the terms, conditions, or covenants of this Agreement by the Owners, shall be entitled to recover from the Owner, in addition to any other relief available in law or equity, all costs and compensation incurred in attempting to obtain enforcement of the Agreement, including reasonable attorneys'fees and court costs. ENURE AGREEMENT BINDING (21) This is the entire Agreement between the parties, and there are no representations, agreements, arrangements or understandings that are not fully expressed herein. This Agreement can be executed in counterparts by the parties hereto, and as so executed shall consist of one agreement,binding on all parties. PRELIMINARY PLANS (22) Owner shall provide and construct public street improvements per preliminary plans titled "STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS — OFFSITE — 95 E. HAMILTON AVENUE," which are subject to approval by the City Engineer, prepared by MFA ENGINEERS AND ASSOCIATES. l IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said City has caused its name to be affixed by its Public Works Director and City Clerk, who are duly authorized by Ordinance 2059 adopted September 20, • • 2005, and said Owner has caused his/her name to be affixed the day and year first above written. 95 HAMILTON LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY ul Flores,Membe7/4f CITY OF CAMPBELL Todd Capurso,Public Works Director City of Campbell • (Notary Acknowledgment for above signator(ies) MUST be attached.) Attest: .„4,2,0i Jed' Wendy ,City Clerk 8 • • CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189 • • A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached,and not the truthfulness,accuracy,or validity of that document. State of California • County of rf\-LV (\G`CZ)--- On \� 1G` ��\ 'z'6 before me, fs., \r-c-,-vi i ,Ut/j1t� 1 Dale ` \a Here Insert Name and Title df the Officer • personally appeared C\ C J p /�;, ( C Name(s)of Signer(s) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed • to the within instrument and'acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their . authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s)on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. • • • I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the JOANNTHOMASON Commission #2110789 laws of the State of California that the foregoing • Q ;LA I Notary.Public-California z paragraph is true and correct. tel Santa Clara County My Comm.Expires May 9,2019 WITNESS my ha d and official seal. • • Signature • • Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signat e of Notary Public OPTIONAL • Completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document. •Description of Attached Document G Title or Type of Document: S EU.lt 1 ^ Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Signer's Name: ❑ Corporate Officer—Title(s): 0 Corporate Officer— Title(s): ❑ Partner— 0 Limited 0 General ❑ Partner— 0 Limited 0 General ❑ Individual 0 Attorney in Fact 0 Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee 0 Guardian of Conservator 0 Trustee ❑ Guardian of Conservator ❑ Other: • 0 Other: Signer is Representing: Signer is Representing: ©2017 National Notary Association • • • • • CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189 • A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached,and not the truthfulness,accuracy,or validity of that document. State of California County of C-%.V\ C,` On JUsC\ 3% r l before me, 5c(-Nv\ � N , \D Date Date ) Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer personally appeared ‘C7a 3 Name(s)of Signer(s) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s)whose name(s) is/are subscribed - to the within instrument and'acknovvledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their . authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s)on the instrument the person(s), orthe entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the J0ANNTH0MAS0N ., Commission#2110789 laws of the State of California that the foregoing �rt,� Z! n�@.`' Notary Public-California paragraph is true and correct, z4T' Santa Clara County My Comm. Expires May 9,2019 WITNESS m hand and official seal. • . Signature C'v • Place Notary Seal and/or Stomp Above l OPTIONAL Sig of Notary Public • OPTIONAL \ Completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: �- - `S rAvvyk Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Signer's Name: ❑ Corporate Officer—Title(s): O Corporate Officer—Title(s): ❑ Partner— O Limited O General C Partner— ❑ Limited O General ❑ Individual O Attorney in Fact ❑ Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact O Trustee O Guardian of Conservator O Trustee ❑ Guardian of Conservator O Other: ❑ Other: Signer is Representing: Signer is Representing: • ©2017 National Notary Association - 1 • • EXHIBIT "A" Legal Description For APN/Parcel ID(s); 279.27-096 THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF CAMPBELL, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Being a portion of Lots 31 &32 as shown and delineated on that certain Tract Map entitled"Tract No. 390 Winchester Villa,"recorded on March 18, 1947 in Book 12 of Maps at Page 55, Santa Clara County Records, • more particularly described as follows: • Beginning at a point in the Western boundary of said Lot 31 from which the Southwestern corner thereof bears- South 00 deg. 34'00"West 2.00 feet distant, said point also being the Northwestern corner of that parcel of land granted to the City of Campbell as shown on that certain grant deed recorded April 16, 1973 in Book 0329 at Page 396, Official Records of Santa Clara County. Thence from said point of beginning along said Western boundary North 00 deg. 34'00" East 139.00 feet to the Northwestern corner thereof;thence along the Northern boundary of said Lots 31 &32 South 89 deg.26'00"East, 110.00 fee t to the Northeastern corner of Lot 32; thence along the Eastern boundary of Lot 32 South 00 deg. 34' 00"West 139.00 feet to the Northeastern corner of that parcel of land granted to the City of Campbell as described on that certain Grant Deed recorded April 16, 1973 in Book 0329 at Page 412, Official Records of Santa Clara County; thence along the Northern boundary of said last mentioned parcel and the first mentioned parcel conveyed to the City of Campbell North 89 deg. 26' 00"West 110.00 feet to the place of beginning. Excepting therefrom all that portion as described in the Deed to the City of Campbell, A Municipal Corporation Recorded September 2, 2010 as Instrument No. 20854941, described as follows: Being a portion of Lots 31 &32 as shown and delineated on that certain Tract Map entitled, 'Tract No. 390 Winchester Villa,"recorded on March 18, 1947 in Book 12 of Maps at Page 55, Santa Clara County Records, more particularly described as follows: • Beginning at a point in the Western boundary of said Lot 31 from which the Southwestern corner thereof bears South 00°34' 00"West 2.00 feet distant,said point also being the Northwestern corner of that parcel of land granted to the City of Campbell as shown on that certain Grant Deed recorded April 16, 1973 in Book 0329 at - Page 39.6, Official Records of Santa Clara County, • • Thence from said point of beginning along said Western boundary North 000 34'00" East 7.00 feet;thence leaving said last mentioned boundary South 89° 26' OD"East 110.00 feet to a point in the Eastern boundary of said Lot 32; thence along the Eastern boundary of Lot 32 South 00° 34' 00" West 7,00 feet to the Northeastern corner of that parcel of land granted to the City of Campbell as described on that certain Grant Deed recorded April 16, 1973 in Book D329 at Page 412, Official Records of Santa Clara County;thence along the Northern boundary of said last mentioned parcel and the first mentioned parcel conveyed to the City of Campbell North 89° 26' 00"West 110.00 feet to the point of beginning. RFcl,, ✓U C AC'b�r FO wa,.� <'0/8 o,,afi01 PLAN REVIEW R ZUTER CITY OF CAMPBELL DNew Submittal esubmittal: (2"d,3rd.5th Review) ❑Revision to Existing Permit RECEIVED 7 S201 APN# 2' 1-- ✓ H" APPLICATION/PERMIT#6V0('UJ [JOB ADDRESS 95- E. ~ r /l - nd 4t"t .. . . JOB DESCRIPTION At-1,0 2` io1V 7-i iC� &/1-1O/' `f 1'1146 A 1 C�-Tlo�l os ortof F PCIk.) BY i'00/ Cc�MM rs96/0 9 fl„ ❑COMMERCIAL ❑RESIDENTIAL 6 Plans _Green-Point Rated Checklist Structural Calcs. WVSD. Soils/Geotechnical Report School Fee Form Truss.Calcs. —Health Department Approval T-24 Calcs. _Response Letter CA Green Specs Specifications Initials Building / Sf T Plan Checked By Date: DAPPROVED SNOT APPROVED Structural: Date: / / . -t DAPPROVED DNOT APPROVED Planning Z E7 Zone: lan Checked By: Date: DAPPROVED ❑NOT APPROVED Public Works / 377 4(71 . Ian Checked By: Date: /I J I ti DAPPROVED I16) P `�� 611J;KI4I T APPROVED %Fire / Plan Checked By: Date: DAPPROVED :NOT APPROVED U PLAN REVIEW ROUTER CITY OF CAMPBELL ONew Submittal OResubmittal: (2nd 3rd 4``',J`h Review) ❑Revision to Existing Permit RECEIVED APN# --7 q---- >7'-- ®qv APPLICATION/PERMIT# —, JOB ADDRESS q 5- -F UANIZAiriM A JOB DESCRIPTION k/ Z z-A-D 04.(-7-02.- E. (J, _ c I MERCIAL ❑RESIDENTIAL __(OP ans _Green-Point Rated Checklist 7Sttructural Calcs. WVSD. Soils/Geotechnical Report _School Fee Form Truss.Calcs. ealth Department Approval T-24 Calcs. 5 esponse Letter CA Green Specs Specifications Initials V' _i ?- Building lan Che ked By V] ) 1 Date:.) `S L DAPPROVED ❑NOT APPROVED Structural: Date: /..41,4 4) DAPPROVED ONOT APPROVED ° IffIA-a— C(k, 5 CiDi L._ --(7.:-z+ , lanning Zone: lan Checke By: £t v\, Date: DAPPROVED - ❑NOT APPROVED • ublic Works ` an Chec e By: D try i S Date: 41 I if co DAPPROVED V OT APPROVED yre lan Checked By: Date: ( \) at DAPPROVED ❑NOT APPROVED 'nwpy S)JOM ailgnd 40Z g 0 ddd Ii MEMORANDUM CITY OF CAMPBELL TO: Bill Bruckart, Building Official DATE: 04/18/2018 FROM: Doris C. Quai Hoi, Project Engineer (408) 866-2157A SUBJECT: BUILDING PERMIT Plan Check for the revised 3/29/18 Plans Site Address: 95 E Hamilton Avenue(APN 279-27-096) For File No(s): BLD2017-569 (PLN2015-274 and 275) Project Description: New 5,772 SF 2-story office building on a vacant lot that was previously merged under application PLN2010-62. Applicant: Saul Flores PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Do not include the Street Improvement Plan set and the On-Site Grading Plan set in the Building plan set. 2. Provide Landscaping and irrigation plans that show irrigation to the park strip in the public right-of-way. 3. Add Sheet A901 to the cover index. 4. Sheet E201 shows parking lot lighting in the landscaping area; show the utilities on the utility grading plans serving the parking lot lighting. 5. Sheet E201: The two symbols shown in the sidewalk; H-1, 3 and Arc H-1, 3 cannot be in the public right of way. 6. E301 — Add a note that these new/existing utility boxes PG&E and Tel serving the property will not be allowed in the sidewalk. New utility boxes will need to be on private property or will need to go in the park strip. Add this note to this E301 sheet as well as on the Off-Site Street Improvement plans. 7. On all the electrical sheets that show the 10' park strip dimension and the 6'71/2" sidewalk dimension, dimension the sidewalk to be 7' so that no private work is done in the public right of way. 8. Sheet A801 shows private lighting in the sidewalk. Please remove out of public right of way. 9. Provide architectural information for the trash enclosure. 10. Provide pavement pattern for the parking lot pavers and include delineation of the parking stalls. J:\LandDev\Plan Check Comments\1-Specific Projects-Active Project in Progress\Hamilton Ave E 95\B1d2017-569 Comments.docx Pagel oft SiSTANTON 1 ARCHITECTURE 95 E HAMILTON AVE BLD2017-00569 TO: City of Campbell 279-27-096 FROM: Stanton Architecture NEW 2-STORY OFFICE BUILDING; DATE: March 29, 2018 INSTALL PL CLEANOUT BACKFLOW REQ (3/30/18 RE- PROJECT: 95 E Hamilton Ave, Campbell, CA 9500 SUBMITTAL) Re: Responses to comments from June 28th - Building Division - Planning Division - Public Works Department - Santa Clara County Fire Department - O'Brien Code Consulting, Inc. BUILDING DIVISION: 1. On Sheet A001, Detail 1, Sheet A206 and Sheet A801, a column is shown between the accessible parking space and Loading Zone. On Sheet A200 you show a different Accessible layout. Please reconcile to show consistent compliant Accessible parking and loading zone. Response: Parking layout is consistent and complies. 2. Please be aware that Accessible parking is required to comply with Section 11 B-503 CBC 2016. Vertical Clearance 11B-503.5 is 114 inches min. Response: Vertical clearance for Accessible parking space is currently 138"and noted on elevations (2/A300). 3. All restrooms on each floor shall be accessible. Non-Accessible restrooms are not allowed on new buildings. Response: Restrooms have been adjusted. All restrooms on both floors are now accessible. 4. On Sheet A200, the Accessible entrance from parking requires a landing that is min. 60 inches. The door strike side clearance must be 24 inches. Response: Landing and door widths comply. See sheet A200. 5. West Valley Sanitation District (W.V.S.D) requires"check valve" protection on this project, please indicate that the building waste lines shall comply with Section 710.1 California Plumbing Code 2016. (Waste lines on second floor are prohibited from running through check valve). Response: Backwater check valve added to sheet P201. Added flagnote 10 on sheet P201. Waste lines updated so second floor waste does not run through check valve on sheets P201 & P202. 6. This project (New Commercial) is required to comply with the California Green Building Code, Non-Residential Mandatory requirements (Chapter 5) 2016 edition. Please indicate how compliance with Chapter 5 will be made. City of Campbell verifies compliance per Section 5.504.4.3.2 Documentation (1). Please submit 2 sets of product specification sheets for all material cited in Chapter 5. Response: Please see product specification sets for all complying materials expected for use on construction of this project. 7. This project is subject to School Fees. Contact the Building Division to obtain fee payment form. Response: Building Division suggests completing and submitting this form in person at the time of plan submittal. PLANNING DIVISION: The Planning Division has reviewed the above referenced building permit submittal for a new office building located at 95 E. Hamilton Ave. Based on a review of the building permit submittal and the Planning Commission's December 13, 2016 approval of a Site & Architectural Review Permit (PLN2015-274) and Tree Removal Permit (PLN2015-275), the following issue(s) must be addressed prior to Planning Division clearance for issuance of a Building Permit: PLAN REVISIONS 1. Tree Protection Plan: The applicant shall submit a Tree Protection Plan (embedded in the plan set) for review and approval by the Community Development Director in consultation with Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC, prior to building permit submittal. The Tree Protection Plan shall substantially comply with the recommendations of the Monarch Consulting Arborist Report, or as may be amended by the Community Development Director. NOTE: Sheets A206 and A207 do not satisfy this plan check comment. Please work with the consulting Arborist, Richard Gessner from Monarch Consulting, to prepare an appropriate Tree Protection Plan. The Tree Protection Plan shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of a building permit. One approved, the Tree Protection Plan shall be inserted into the building plan set (24"x36"). Please also replace the "tree report" on page A207 with the Monarch Consulting Arborist Report (pages 17 through 27 and pages 34 through 37) that was provided to you with the June 1 9tn plan check letter. Response: Tree protection plan on sheet A206 now denotes all requested recommendations from Monarch Consulting Arborists regarding means and methods for protecting trees which will be saved on site. See general notes (3/A206) and plan on (1/A206) for intended measures, and civil details on sheet (C-3, C-3a, & C-5). 2. Parking Lot Design and Construction: The parking lot shall be designed and constructed to minimize aeration deficit (compaction) and water deficit (dehydration) to the greatest extent feasible. The design of the parking lot shall substantially comply with the recommendations of the Monarch Consulting Arborist Report, or as may be amended by the Community Development in consultation with Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC. NOTE: Simply stating that "the parking lot design will comply..." does not satisfy this plan check comment. Please work with the consulting Arborist, Richard Gessner from Monarch Consulting, to prepare an appropriate parking lot design. This plan shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of a building permit. Response: Tree protection plan on sheet A206 now denotes all requested recommendations from Monarch Consulting Arborists regarding means and methods for protecting trees which will be saved on site. See general notes (3/A206) and plan on (1/A206) for intended measures, and civil details on sheet (C-3, C-3a, & C-5). 3. Revised Plans to be submitted and approved: The applicant shall submit revised plans (site plan, grading and drainage plans, etc.) that substantially comply with the approved Tree Protection Plan (yet to be approved) and shall include sufficient detail (e.g., materials, construction methods, etc.) to determine that trees will be adequately protected. NOTE: Please work with the consulting Arborist, Richard Gessner from Monarch Consulting, to prepare appropriate grading and drainage plans. It is highly recommended that you coordinate with both the consulting arborist and the Public Works Department to ensure everyone's comments are addressed. Response: Design of parking lot area has been reviewed by Rick Gessner and tree protection plan on sheet A206 reflects methods of protecting soil structure and root systems. See general notes (3/A206) and plan on (1/A206) for intended measures, and civil details on sheet (C-3, C-3a, & C-5). 4. Pre-Construction Meeting with Arborist: Prior to beginning work, all contractors involved with the project shall attend a pre-construction meeting Richard Gessner from Monarch Consulting to review the tree protection guidelines. NOTE: The project planner, Cindy McCormick, shall attend the pre-construction meeting along with Richard Gessner. Response: Meeting will be scheduled to take place between all required parties before construction on the project commences. PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: 1. Do not include the Street Improvement Plan set and the On-Site Grading Plan set in the Building Plan set. Response: Sheets have been removed. NO oXie- t40T 2. Resolution No. 4354: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant is required to complete the Conditions of Approval for the project approved by the Planning Commission on December 13, 2016 (PLN2015-274 and 275). See attached resolution. Response: Conditions of Approval document is located on sheet A002. 3. Public Improvements: The scope of this project triggers the requirements for Boulevard Frontage Improvements as required by Campbell Municipal Code 11.24.040. The City of Campbell's adopted Streetscape Standards identify this portion of Hamilton Avenue as an Image Street with very specific frontage improvement requirements. This project triggers the requirement for the installation of the streetscape improvements. The applicant will be required to construct these improvements and have them completed prior to occupying the building. The Streetscape Standards can be viewed here: (http://www.cityofcampbell.com/DocumentCenter/View/168) Visit the City's website and follow the submittal requirements for Public Works once this application has been received entitlement. The checklist for the various plans required for submittal can be found on the City's Website at City Services > Public Works > Engineering > Land Developments > Documents, (or use this link: http://www.cityofcampbell.com/206/Documents). See instructions on: 1. Checklist for Grading and Drainage and 2. Checklist for Street Improvement Plans. The Building Permit will not be issued until all Public Works Conditions of Approval have been satisfied. These Conditions of Approval are a supplement to the plans by MFA Engineers & Associates. The plans are not approved for construction. Further plan checking by Public Works will be required post entitlement. Response: 4. Pervious Pavement: On Tuesday, September 27th, Public Works met with Ali Abiani, Civil Engineer on record, and discussed the relocation of the permeable pavers to be installed along the westerly surface parking areas to reduce the total amount of impervious area resulting in keeping below the size threshold for C.3 applicability and eliminate the need for storm water treatment measures. Response: Permeable pavers will be used throughout. FIRE DEPARTMENT—SANTA CLARA COUNTY 1. Sheet A000: On the plans, provide a deferred submittal section that includes the following: A. Fire Service underground CFC B. Fire Sprinkler Suppression System C. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring System D. Two-Way Communication System Response: Notes are on cover sheet. See 3/A000. 2. Sheet A001: Occupant load factor for the kitchenette is either 7 sq. ft.or 15 sq ft depending on seating arrangement, in accordance with CFC Table 1004.1.2. Note: A 200 sq ft occupant load factor is used for commercial kitchen facilities. Revise occupant load calculations. Response: No seating will be provided in kitchenette. Space is simply to be used as an accessory space to the main office area. Occupant load table and diagram has been updated. 3. Sheet A001: It appears that the occupant load on the second floor is over 49.Therefore, revise the plans in order to provide a code compliant second exit. Revise the egress analysis to demonstrate access to two exits, including associated with a second exit. Revise the egress analysis to demonstrate access to two exits, including required common path of travel, maximum exit access travel distances, distance between the two exits, etc. Note: the second exit would need to demonstrate compliance with CFC 1023.1, 1023.2, 1023.3,and 1023.3.1, as noted in SCCFD PC # 17-1642. Otherwise, reduce the area of the kitchenette and/or conference room in order to achieve a maximum occupant load of 49. Response: Occupant load table and exiting diagrams have been updated on sheet A001. The load on level 2 has been reduced to 43 occupants and the exterior staircase will be used as the fully complying means of egress. 4. Sheet A001: Revise the plans to show the common path of travel and maximum exit access travel distances are to be measured and shown from the most remote point within a story along the natural and unobstructed path of horizontal and vertical egress travel. Response: This has been provided in the previous submittal. See sheet A001 5. Sheets A201, A700, A900, and A901: Revise plans to show all fire-rated walls and fire-rated opening protectives as specified on sheet A301, and in accordance with CFC 1023.2 and 1027.6. Response: All ratings are shown on plan views, and reference wall type schedule on page A900 6. Sheet A900: Provide door and window schedule to show all fire-rated opening protectives A. As specified on sheet A301 for the exit stairwell B. For the new door between the elevator machine room and the elevator shaft, in accordance with CBC 3005.4.1.4 Response: Updated door schedule shows all door types and required ratings per type. Windows are all the same and therefore require the same ratings and U-values. 7. Sheet A202, A903, and E303: On the plans, provide clearances and distances for fire department access on the roof and smoke ventilation operations associated with the photovoltaic system, in accordance with CFC 605.11. Response: Roof access panel is located at the southwest corner of the roof and can be seen on both the Roof Plan (Sheet A202) and the Level 2 RCP (Sheet A204). Pathway clearances on the roof are shown on the Roof Plan (A202) and comply with distances from edges and equipment. 8. Sheet A700: On the plans, specify that"an access panel is to be provided near the top of the elevator shaft for the installation and servicing of the fire sprinkler, smoke detector, and the heat detector that are to be installed in the shaft, in accordance with CBC 3005.4.1, CFC 907.3.3, NFPA 72, 21.4, and Otis specification on drawing number HYD-MRL-POWBO." Note: This access panel is different and distinct from the door between the elevator machine room and the elevator shaft. Response: Note has been provided on both the Roof Plan (A202), and sheet A700. 9. Sheet E203: On the plans, specify that the lighting controller shall not control power to egress lights nor the emergency egress lights Response: Note has been added to sheets E201, E202. 10. Sheet E203: On the plans, clarify whether the photometric values represented are: A. Under full lighting, half lighting, or some other lighting level. B. Normal power or emergency power Response: Note has been added that the values are under emergency power. O'BRIEN CODE CONSULTING, INC. E. Sheet A000: Regarding the "Sheet List": Sheet A000: The revised "Sheet List" shows Civil plan sheets C-0, C-1, C-6, and C-7. However, none of these plan sheets are found in the resubmitted plan set. Please make sure all sheets listed on the "Sheet List"on Sheet A000 are included in the plan set in the order in which they appear on the "Sheet List". Any missing/new plan sheets will be reviewed at recheck Additional comments may be required at recheck Response: Sheet list has been adjusted accordingly. I. Amend plans to correct or fill-in any and all incorrect or missing detail, section, and/or plan references (e.g., see Sheets A200, A201; etc.). NOTE: Please review entire set of plans for all detail, section, elevation, etc., reference, as the above are only a few of the incorrect or missing references. Plan checker is unable to locate corrections on Sheet A200 and Sheet A201 where all of the exterior elevation "tags" appear to be incorrect. Comment remains outstanding. Response: All tags have been verified. J. Sheet A000: Amend plans to specify each specific item of construction which is intended to have a deferred submittal (e.g., solar panels shown on Sheet A202; storefronts shown on Sheets A300, A301, A901, etc.; Brise Soleil shown on Sheets A200 and A902; interior and exterior stairways; etc.). Further, add a note which indicates "...these deferred submittals shall first be submitted to the project architect and engineer for review and coordination; following the completion of project architect/engineer review and coordination, a submittal to the City shall be made (for City review and approval), which shall include a letter stating this review and coordination has been performed and completed and plans and calculations for the deferred items are found to be acceptable (e.g., with regard to geometry, load conditions, etc.) with no exceptions." CBC Section 107.3.4.1 Sheet A000 has been revised to show a list of "Deferred Submittal" at "General Notes" note no. 4. Per the original comment, add a note at the list of deferred submittals which indicates "...these deferred submittals shall first be submitted to the project architect and engineer for review and coordination; following the completion of project architect/engineer review and coordination, a submittal to the City shall be made(for City review and approval), which shall include a letter stating this review and coordination has been performed and completed and plans and calculations for the deferred items are found to be acceptable (e.g., with regard to geometry, load conditions, etc.) with no exceptions." Response: Note has been added to cover sheet. M. Sheet A900: The exterior and interior wall and shaft wall types show all walls with metal stud framing. However, the structural plans show all exterior and interior walls with wood stud framing. Please review and reconcile this discrepancy between the architectural plans and structural plans and design. Sheet A900: Regarding the revised plans: i. The Wall Type A, B, and C details have been revised to show wood studs. However, the wall type tables shown below each wall type specify metal stud framing. Please review and resolve this discrepancy. ii. The notes at Wall Types A, B, and C reference UL assemblies U415 and U438, which are fire-rated assemblies for walls comprised of metal studs. However, the Wall Type A, B, and C details show wood stud framing and the structural plans show all exterior and interior walls with wood stud framing. Please review and resolve this discrepancy. Comment remains outstanding. Response: All wall types on sheet A900 are now coordinated to represent all wood stud framing with appropriate sizes indicated. O. Sheet C-0: Regarding the"Grading and Drainage Notes" A. Note no. 1 references the 2007 CBC, which is no longer current. Please amend Note no. 1 to reference the current adopted Code: 2016 CBC. B. Note no. 3 lists the date of the soils report as January 5, 2015. However, the actual date shown on the soils report submitted with the permit documents for this project is January 5, 2017. Please review and revise the Note no. 3 at the "Grading and Drainage Notes" to show the correct date. The architect's comment response letter states, "Recommendations have been updated on Sheet C-0". However, Sheet C-0 was not included in the resubmitted plan set. Plan checker is unable to confirm the architect's comment response. Comment remains outstanding. Response: Please see sheet O-2 T-24 ENERGY COMPLIANCE COMMENTS: T7. The NRCC-PLB-01-E lists the number of water heaters as 4. However, the "Plumbing Fixture Schedule" on Sheet P000 and the plumbing floor plans show a total of five water heaters (four identical water heater types at the bathrooms and one water heater at the Kitchenette/Break Room). Please make the plans and PLB compliance forms agree. The architect's comment response shows, "updated on Sheets M301, M302, and M303". However, the revised Energy Calculations still show four water heaters, while the plumbing plans still show five as stated in the original plan check comment. Comment remains outstanding. Response: Title 24 Plumbing updated on sheet M303. Forms NCAA-PLB-01-E now shows four 3.5 KW water heaters and one 8.32 KW water heater for a total of five water heaters. T8.The complete revised PLB calculations must be fully signed and permanently affixed to the plans. The architect's comment response shows, "updated on Sheets M301, M302, and M303": However, the revised Energy Calculations still show four water heaters, while the plumbing plans still show five as stated in plan check comment 77, which will require the PLB calculations to be revised. Comment remains outstanding. Response: Title 24 Plumbing updated on sheet M303. Forms NCAA-PLB-01-E now shows four 3.5 KW water heaters and one 8.32 KW water heater for a total of five water heaters. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS: Note: The resubmitted calculations booklet pages are not numbered. Plan check comment references to calculation page numbers below are based on the cover sheet of the calculations booklet counted as the starting calculations page 1. S5.Calculations Sheet nos. 4 through 6: Several of the Enercalc calculations sheets reference the 2000/2003 IBC and previous Code Edition referenced standards (i.e. NDS 1997/2001, etc.), which are no longer current. Since this project was submitted for building permit after January 1, 2017 (City stamped received date is May 22, 2017), the current adopted Code is the 2016 CBC with applicable current Referenced Standards listed in Chapter 35. As a result, please review and amend the Enercalc calculations to be based on the current adopted Code: 2016 CBC (based on the 2015 IBC) and applicable Referenced Standards (i.e. ANSI/AWC NDS-2015, ACI 318-14, etc.). Revise the plans if required by the revised calculations. The revised calculations and plans will be reviewed at recheck. Additional comments may be required at recheck. Regarding the revised Roof Framing calculations and Roof Plan: A. Calculations sheet nos. 3 through 19: The revised roof framing calculations include the summary results for each framing member only. Please locate/provide the roof framing calculations for each framing member showing the input data, such that the roof dead and live loads listed on page no. 2 of the calculations can be confirmed as the loads used in the Forte calculations. B. Calculations Sheet nos. 11 through 15: The revised calculations for Roof Beam RB2 specify 24'-1"for the center span. However, the Roof Framing Plan on Sheet S-5 shows 26-foot for the center span for the two beams labeled RB2. Please make the plans and calculations agree. C. Sheet S-5: The Roof Framing Plan shows roof beams RB-1 and RB-2 supporting the ends of roof beams RB4 at each side of the skylight. Please locate in the calculations for roof beams RB-1 and RB-2 where the point loads from the reactions at each RB4 beam is included. Calculations sheet nos. 8 through 15, 18, and 19. Response: Please see updated calculations S7. Calculations Sheet no. 7: The TJI Floor Span table included in the calculations booklet is the March 2014 version for Western Canada, which is not the current span table. Furthermore, the maximum live loads shown at the Floor Joist span tables in the Truss Joist TJI Joist Specifier's Guide TJ-4000 (dated February 2017) are 40 psf, which is less than the required live loads for this office building project (refer to comment S3 above). Please provide calculations to justify the TJI floor joists specified on the 2„d Floor Framing Plan on Sheet S-3 for review. The floor joist calculations will be reviewed at recheck. Additional comments may be required at recheck. Regarding the revised Floor Framing calculations and Second Floor Framing Plan: A. Calculations sheet nos. 20 through 26 and 29 through 32: The revised floor framing calculations include the summary results for each framing member only. Please locate/provide the floor framing calculations for each framing member showing the input data, such that the floor dead and live loads listed on page no. 2 of the calculations can be confirmed as the loads used in the Forte calculations. B. Sheet S-3: The Second Floor Framing Plan shows beam FB4 supporting the end of the beam labeled FB5 above the stair hallway. Please locate in the calculations for beam FB4 where the point load from the reaction of beam FB5 is included. Calculations sheet nos. 31 and 32. C. Sheet S-3: The Second Floor Framing Plan shows a beam labeled FB5 at the side of the stairway supporting the end of the beam labeled FB4 above the stairway. Please locate in the calculations for beam FB5 where the point load from the reaction of beam FB4 is included. Calculations sheet nos. 31 and 32. D. Sheet S-3: The Second Floor Framing Plan shows several beams labeled FB5. Calculations sheet no. 32 is based on an 11'-3"beam span for FB5 which appears to be the beam labeled FB5 at the left side of the stairway. However, the beam labeled FB5 shown at the stair hallway and the beam labeled FB5 shown at the front exterior wall of the stair hallway appear to have spans greater than 11'-3". Please locate/provide calculations to justify these two different beams labeled FB5 on the Second Floor Framing Plan. Response: Please see architectural for added item on cover for deferred submittal. S8. Sheet A002: Detail no. 2 shows glass guards at the stairway. As a result, please provide the following in accordance with CBC Section 1015.2.1: A. Structural guard construction details and calculations showing the proposed glass guards are capable of resisting a 50 plf load and a 200-lb. concentrated load (loads need not be assumed to act concurrently) applied in any direction. CBC 1607.8 B. Panel fillers shall be designed to withstand a horizontally applied normal load of 50 pound on an area equal to 1 square foot. CBC 1607.8.1.2 and ASCE 7- 10 Section 4.5.1 C. Show compliance to CBC Section 2407 regarding the type of glass, thickness of glass, loads and support. D. A safety factor of four shall be used in all calculations. CBC 2407.1.1 The structural comment response states the glass guards are to be a deferred submittal. As a result, please amend the list of Deferred Submittals shown at "General Note"no. 4 on 3/A000 to include "glass guard rails" Response: Please see updated calculations S9. Calculations Sheet no. 15: The Seismic Base Shear calculations show the "Site Class"as "B". However, according to the Soils Report page no. 4 the"Site Class"for this project is "D". Please amend the Seismic Base Shear calculations to show the correct project"Site Class" ("D"). The comment response letter states the calculations have been revised to show "Site Class"D. However, the Seismic Base Shear calculations shown on revised calculations sheet no. 62 show the "Site Class"as "B". Comment remains outstanding. Response: Please see updated calculations S10. Sheets S-3 and S-5, and Calculations Page no. 19: The Second Floor Framing Plan shows shear walls at Roof Level Line ... supported by beams... Regarding the revised plans and calculations: A. Sheets S-3 and S-5 and Calculations Sheet nos. 29, 30, and 66: The Second Floor Framing Plan shows shear walls at Roof Level Line E supported by beams FB-3. Please locate/provide calculations to check beam FB-3 for dead + live + wind/seismic loads. Check uplift and connections at the ends of each beam. Be sure to multiply the seismic load by the omega factor. ASCE 7-10 Section 12.3.3.3 B. Sheet S-3: Please amend the Second Floor Framing Plan to show the 2-MST72 straps at each end of each shear panel at Shear Wall Line 2. The Roof Framing Plan currently shown the straps at one end of the shear walls only. Calculations Sheet no. 67. C. Sheet S-2: Please amend the Foundation Plan to show the two (2) SSW24x10 shear panels at floor level Line D. Calculations Sheet no. 68. Response: For portion A, special load combination cases have been check in the calculations. For portion B: Please see updated S-5 showing the missing callout for 2-MST72. For portion C: Please see updated S-2 showing the 2-SSW24X10. S12. Sheet S-2: Please locate in on the plans and calculations the lateral-force-resisting-system for the floor level at gridline 1. Plans and calculations appear to show lateral-force-resisting elements (shear walls and Simpson Strongwalls) in the front-back direction at floor level gridlines 3 and 5 only. The revised calculations sheet no. 72 specifies two moment frames to be provided at floor level gridline 1. Regarding the revised plan Sheet S-2: A. The plans show two bays labeled "moment frame" at grid line 1. However, the bay between gridlines B and C show a glulam beam, while calculations sheet no. 72 specifies a W18x50 beam. Please make the plans and calculations agree. B. The plans show two bays labeled "moment frame" at grid line 1. The moment frame located at the bay between gridlines C and D shows a TS8x8x1/4 column at the intersection of gridlines 1 and D, while calculations sheet no. 72 specifies HSS8x8x1/2 columns at the moment frame. Please make the plans and calculations agree. Response: Update the beam to be W18X50 and the post to be HSS8X8X1/2. S13. Calculations sheet nos. 26 and 27: Calculations are provided for "Beam to column connection design of moment frame". However, plan checker is unable to locate the referenced moment frame in the lateral calculations. Furthermore, the R-value used in the seismic base shear calculations is for wood framed shear walls. Please clarify and locate the proposed moment frame on the plans. Revise lateral calculations accordingly. The moment frame will be reviewed at recheck. Additional calculations may be required at recheck. The revised calculations booklet does not include any calculations for the moment frame beam-column connections or foundation base connections and footings. Please locate/provide calculations to justify the moment frame beam-column connections, foundation base connections, and footings for review. The revised calculations, plans and details will be reviewed at recheck. Additional comments may be required at recheck. Response: Please see the revised and added calculations for the connection and footing for the moment frames. S14. Sheet S-2: The Foundation Plan shows a note referencing detail no. 1/S-5 at the concrete slab. However, plan checker is unable to locate a detail no. 1 on Sheet S-5 of the plans. Please locate/provide referenced detail for review and coordinate detail references on the plans accordingly. Regarding the revised plans: A. The comment response letter states the call-out should be 1/S-6. However, the revised plans still show 1/S-5 at the slab note. Comment remains outstanding. B. Sheet S-2: The revised plan sheet shows the plan title as "2"d Floor Framing Plan". However, this plan sheet actually shows the Foundation Plan (which matches the plan title shown on the title block). Please amend the plan title(shown below the Foundation Plan)to show "Foundation Plan". Response: Please see updated S-2 S15. Sheet S-3: Please complete the partially blank detail "tag" shown at gridline D (near the intersection with gridline 4). Sheet S-3 has been revised to address this comment. However, the revised plan sheet S-3 shows the plan title as "Roof Framing Plan". However, this plan sheet actually shows the Second Floor Framing Plan (which matches the plan title shown on the title block). Please amend the plan title (shown below the Second Floor Framing Plan)to show "Second Floor Framing Plan". Response: Updated and revised. S18. Sheet A200 of the plans show a new detached "Garbage" enclosure. Please locate/provide structural plans, calculations, and details on the plans for the proposed "Garbage" enclosure for review. This detached structure will be reviewed at recheck. Additional comments may be required at recheck. Sheet S-6.1 has been revised to include details for the detached "Garbage" enclosure. Please amend the plans to dimension the height of the walls of the Garbage enclosure. Wall height must be consistent with wall height shown on architectural plans. If Garbage enclosure wall height is greater than 6-feet above grade, then provide structural calculations to justify the CMU block wall details for review. Response: Please see updated S-6.1 indicating that the max height is 6'. S21. Obtain two (2) copies of the City of Campbell Special Inspection and Testing form and include them with your resubmittal, completely filled-out and signed by all requested parties. Note that special inspection per CBC 1704 is required for the items listed on Sheet S-1.1 of the plans. Please note: City Special Inspection forms are available for download from the City of Campbell website at http://www.citvofcampbell.com/DocumentCenter/HomeNiew/7137 No such forms were included with the resubmitted documents. Comment remains outstanding. Response: Please see the special inspection form attached at this resubmittal. iw �o of n. bLA-A-(41,i) ��lsiu Pd�i M .Iq d ioilea;siu�wpy SMJOM a!Ign, _ ZI0Z t ti AdW 1:'^ '' 410- Li 14AN REVIEW OUTER CITY OF CAMPBELL ew Submittal Resubmittal: (2"' 3"',4`h 5th Review) ❑Revision to Existing Permit RECEIVED --1.21-24 APN#E Z7"1 -27-12q APPLICATION/PERMIT �,c" JOB ADDRESS 5 (a,{,tz- ! 1_Q� JOB DESCRIPTION (1\-, !/ br,cC1 G2 LW 67 I ts MMERCIAL ❑RESIDENTIAL (...? _Plans (3 ; \ 4.Green-Point Rated Checklist Z '0 (A.115 structural Cald l WVSD // ?/Soils/Geotechnical Report School Fee Form 2.-- _ ��`" ' Truss Calcs. Health Depaitinent Approval T-24 Calcs. Response Letter CA Green Specs Specifications Initials ►fl i uilding y : ,21,ec ed By '� �, Date: _ "'� ❑APPROVED ❑NOT APPROVED o n xi C t - o G �{ y l J c....5etz.4-6( d Date: T Q m ;APPROVED ❑NOT PROVED �, < — t it 1� EU oin: a° Z.V Q CZ� (-�c1�vo e �,N svV7 --�, m Tanning 4Zone: P an Checke By: Date: C2J ❑APPROVED ❑NOT APPROVED ublic Works ?0?4 'j I . , , Tan C ec d By: Date: 61 '�'`I L� �� '�� / LIAPPROVED OT APPROVED ire Man Checked y: Date: C) DAPPROVED ❑NOT APPROVED MEMORANDUM CITY OF CAMPBELL TO: Bill Bruckart,Building Official DATE: 05/30/2017 FROM: Doris C. Quai Hoi,Project Engineer (408) 866-215 SUBJECT: BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Site Address: 95 E Hamilton Avenue(APN 279-27-096) For File No(s): BLD2017-569 (PLN2015-274 and 275) Project Description: New 5,772 SF 2-story office building on a vacant lot that was previously merged under application PLN2010-62. Applicant: Saul Flores PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Do not include the Street Improvement Plan set and the On-Site Grading Plan set in the Building plan set. 2. Resolution No. 4354: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant is required to complete the Conditions of Approval for the project approved by the Planning Commission on December 13, 2016 (PLN2015-274 and 275). See attached Resolution. 3. Public Improvements: The scope of this project triggers the requirement for Boulevard Frontage Improvements as required by Campbell Municipal Code 11.24.040. The City of Campbell's adopted Streetscape Standards identify this portion of Hamilton Avenue as an Image Street with very specific frontage improvement requirements. This project triggers the requirement for the installation of the streetscape improvements. The applicant will be required to construct these improvements and have them completed prior to occupying the building. The Streetscape Standards can be viewed here: (http://vvww.cityofcampbell.com/DocumentCenterNiew/168) Visit the City's website and follow the submittal requirements for Public Works once this application has received entitlement. The checklist for the various plans required for submittal can be found on the City's Website at City ServicesPublic Works Engineering►Land Development Documents, (or use this link: http://www.cityofcampbell.com/206/Documents). See instructions on: 1. Checklist for Grading and Drainage and 2. Checklist for Street Improvement Plans. The Building Permit will not be issued until all Public Works Conditions of Approval have been satisfied. These Conditions of Approval are a supplement to the plans by MFA Engineers &Associates. The plans are not approved for construction. Further plan checking by Public Works will be required post entitlement. 4. Pervious Pavement: On Tuesday September 27th, Public Works met with Ali Abiani, Civil Engineer on record, and discussed the relocation of the permeable pavers to be installed along the westerly surface parking areas to reduce the total amount of impervious area resulting in keeping below the size threshold for C.3 applicability and eliminate the need for storm water treatment measures. J:\LandDev\Conditions\Bldg\Hamilton E 95 Bldg.docx Page 1 of 1 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Page 7 of 11 PLN2015-274 and PLN2015-275 - 95 E. Hamilton Avenue Site &Architectural Review Permit and Tree Removal Permit c. School District: Campbell Union School District (378-3405) Campbell Union High School District (371-0960) Moreland School District (874-2900) Cambrian School District (377-2103) d. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (Demolitions Only) e. Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health f. San Jose Water Company (279-7900) 41. P.G.& E.: Applicant is advised to contact Pacific Gas and Electric Company as early as possible in the approval process. Service installations, changes and/or relocations may require substantial scheduling time and can cause significant delays in the approval process. Applicant should also consult with P.G. and E. concerning utility easements, distribution pole locations and required conductor clearances. 42. CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING CODE: This project is subject to the mandatory requirements of Chapter 5 of the California Green Building Code 2013. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 43. Response Letter: Upon submittal of the Street Improvement Plans and the Grading and Drainage Plans, the applicant shall provide an itemized response letter verifying that all the Public Works Conditions of Approval have been addressed. 44. Preliminary Title Report: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall provide a current (within the past 6 months) Preliminary Title Report. 45. Soils Report: Upon submittal of the Parcel/Final Map, applicant shall provide a soils report prepared by a registered geotechnical or civil engineer. 46. Storm Drain Area Fee: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall pay the required Storm Drain Area fee, currently set at $2,650.00 per net acre, which is $833.00. 47. Grading and Drainage Plan: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall conduct hydrology studies based on a ten-year storm frequency, prepare an engineered grading and drainage plan, and pay fees required to obtain necessary grading permits. Prior to occupancy, the design engineer shall provide written certification that the development has been built per the engineered grading and drainage plans. In addition, a plan review letter will be required of the Geotechnical engineer for the entire grading and drainage system which should include but is not limited to a review of the subsurface of the non-compacted biotreatment material that may have potential for subsurface failure and surface failure due to vehicle loads. • ' Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Page 8 of 11 PLN2015-274 and PLN2015-275 — 95 E. Hamilton Avenue Site &Architectural Review Permit and Tree Removal Permit 48. Storm Water Information: On the grading plans show the amount, in square footage, of: a. Existing impervious area. b. Proposed impervious area. c. Proposed pervious area. 49. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Measures: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements, Santa Clara Valley Water District requirements, and the Campbell Municipal Code regarding stormwater pollution prevention. The primary objectives are to improve the quality and reduce the quantity of stormwater runoff to the bay. Resources to achieve these objectives include Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbook for New Development and Redevelopment ("CA BMP Handbook") by the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA), 2003; Start at the Source: A Design Guidance Manual for Stormwater Quality Protection ("Start at the Source") by the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA), 1999; and Using Site Design Techniques to Meet Development Standards for Stormwater Quality: A Companion Document to Start at the Source ("Using Site Design Techniques") by BASMAA, 2003. The parking lot shall be constructed with materials approved by the Public Works Department and Community Development Department in consultation with the Arborist. A maintenance agreement and plan will be required so that City staff can make yearly inspections. 50. Street Tree Removal(s): To accommodate the required street scape plan, the existing Crape Myrtle street tree, will be removed as part of this project. Three (3) ash trees (e.g., evergreen ash or purple ash) will be installed as part of the streetscape plan. 51. Utilities: All on-site utilities shall be installed underground per Section 21.18.140 of the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings or additions. Applicant shall comply with all plan submittals, permitting, and fee requirements of the serving utility companies. Utility locations shall not cause damage to any existing street trees. Where there are utility conflicts due to established tree roots or where a new tree will be installed, alternate locations for utilities shall be explored. Include utility trench details where necessary. Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Page 9 of 11 PLN2015-274 and PLN2015-275 - 95 E. Hamilton Avenue Site &Architectural Review Permit and Tree Removal Permit 52. Water Meter(s) and Sewer Cleanout(s): Existing and proposed water meter(s) and sewer cleanout(s) shall be relocated or installed on private property behind the public right-of-way line. Sheet C-2 shows the (N) SCO in the public right-of-way. Also on Sheet C-2 a water meter is shown to be on private property in the (N) driveway approach. Verify with SJW if this is an acceptable location. If not, the (N) water meter needs to be relocated elsewhere on the property. 53. Utility Coordination Plan: Prior to issuance of building permits for the site, the applicant shall submit a utility coordination plan and schedule for approval by the City Engineer for installation and/or abandonment of all utilities. The plan shall clearly show the location and size of all existing utilities and the associated main lines; indicate which utilities and services are to remain; which utilities and services are to be abandoned, and where new utilities and services will be installed. Joint trenches for new utilities shall be used whenever possible. Sheet C-2 shows the replacement of a 4" lateral to a 6" lateral. Work directly with WVSD on details and design requirements. The Off-Site Civil plans will incorporate a dedicated sheet for WVSD design and details. Applicant will need to coordinate with WVSD during the plan check and review process. 54. Pavement Restoration: Based on the utility coordination plan, the applicant shall prepare a pavement restoration plan for approval by the City Engineer prior to any utility installation or abandonment. Streets that have been reconstructed or overlaid within the previous five years will require boring and jacking for all new utility installations. Hamilton Avenue has not been reconstructed or overlaid in the last 5 years. The pavement restoration plan shall indicate how the street pavement shall be restored following the installation or abandonment of all utilities necessary for the project. Pavement restoration work will extend to the south side of E Hamilton Avenue and incorporate both the water lateral and sanitary sewer lateral to create one large rectangular restoration area. There will need to be a review of the traffic control plan and how this work will be accomplished during normal business hours. 55. Street Improvement Agreements / Plans / Encroachment Permit / Fees / Deposits: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, applicant shall execute a street improvement agreement, cause plans for public street improvements to be prepared by a registered civil engineer, pay various fees and deposits, post security and provide insurance necessary to obtain an encroachment permit for construction of the standard public street improvements, as required by the City Engineer. The plans shall include the following, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer: Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Page 10 of 11 PLN2015-274 and PLN2015-275 - 95 E. Hamilton Avenue Site &Architectural Review Permit and Tree Removal Permit a. Show location of all existing utilities within the new and existing public right-of- way. b. Relocation of all existing utilities including utility boxes, covers, poles, etc. outside of sidewalk area. No utility boxes, covers, etc. will be allowed in the 7' sidewalk area. c. Removal of existing driveway approaches and necessary sidewalk, curb and gutter. d. Removal of existing curb and gutter, existing sidewalk, driveway approaches and par strip, and install new city streetscape standard. e. Installation of a minimum of three (3) City approved street trees and irrigation at 40 feet on center. One tree will be located west of the new driveway; two will be located east of the two driveways. (There is a requirement for a 10' landscaped buffer behind private property fronting Hamilton Avenue). Park strip ground cover shall be no mow (fine fescue and hair grass Deschampsia) turf with sub-surface drip irrigation such as Eco- Mats (or approved equal). f. This project is subject to the City's Streetscape Standards for Hamilton Avenue, which requires a 10 foot landscaped park strip with City approved street trees 40 feet on center, and a 7 foot sidewalk. g. Installation of asphalt concrete overlay per street pavement restoration plan for utility installation and/or abandonment, as required by the City Engineer. h. Installation of traffic control, stripes and signs. Should the any striping work be cut due to utility trench work, the applicant will be required to restripe the entire street frontage and not just the areas that need replaced. i. Construction of conforms to existing public and private improvements, as necessary. The sidewalks will need to conform at each end at a 90 degree angle with at least a minimum of 4' wide sidewalk to connect to the existing sidewalks. This will be finalized in the plan check review process. j. All existing utility boxes and its covers, that will remain in the park strip will require readjustments and must be level to the sidewalk, or as required by the City Engineer. k. Submit final plans in a digital format acceptable to the City. 56. Street Improvements Completed for Occupancy and Building Permit Final: Prior to allowing occupancy and/or final building permit signoff for any and/or all buildings, the applicant shall have the required street improvements and pavement restoration installed and accepted by the City, and the design engineer shall submit as-built drawings to the City. 57. Maintenance of Landscaping: Owner(s), current and future, are required to maintain the landscaped park strip and tree wells in the public right of way. This includes, but is not limited to: trees, lawn, plantings, irrigation, etc. Trees shall not be pruned in a manner that would not allow the tree to grow to a mature height. Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Page 11 of 11 PLN2015-274 and PLN2015-275 - 95 E. Hamilton Avenue Site &Architectural Review Permit and Tree Removal Permit 58. Utility Encroachment Permit: Separate encroachment permits for the installation of utilities to serve the development will be required (including water, sewer, gas, electric, etc.). Applicant shall apply for and pay all necessary fees for utility permits for sanitary sewer, gas, water, electric and all other utility work. 59.Additional Street Improvements: Should it be discovered after the approval process that new utility main lines, extra utility work or other work is required to service the development, and should those facilities or other work affect any public improvements, the City may add conditions to the development/project/permit, at the discretion of the City Engineer, to restore pavement or other public improvements to the satisfaction of the City. 60. Trash Enclosure Requirements: a. NPDES Permit No. CAS612008 (CRWQCB): C.3.a.i. (7): For all new development and redevelopment projects that are subject to the Permittee's planning, building, development, or other comparable review, but not regulated by Provision C.3, encourage the inclusion of adequate source control measures to limit pollutant generation, discharge, and runoff. These source control measures should include covered trash, food waste, and compactor enclosures. b. Campbell Municipal Code 14.02.030 "Stormwater Pollution Control / Requirements". The code states that no pollutants or water containing pollutants can be discharged into the City's storm drain system. Trash enclosures contain pollutants. During a rain event (or during general cleaning) water washes over and into roofless enclosures, collecting pollutants and discharging to the City's storm drain system. Applicants are required to show how new trash enclosures will not discharge pollutants into the storm drain system. One possible method is to provide a sanitary drain in the trash enclosure. c. West Valley Sanitation District (VVVSD) the local sanitary sewer agency's authority and standards: If a sanitary connection will be installed, WVSD requires a roof on the enclosure. • HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS Number of pages --12----including cover For New two story office Building 95 E. Hamilton Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 , SIONAL Fti QQ.o\Pg1AN1 % By �* c\\1\ ST MFA Engineers & Associates _ 3001 S. Winchester Blvd, Suite B Campbell, CA 95008 Date November 15, 20017 SITE INFORMATION GROSS STUDY AREA 14520 SF = 0.3333 acre IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATIONS Existing Impervious: 0.00 SF = 0.0 0 0 acre Pervious: 14,520 SF = 0.3333 acre Proposed Impervious: 11,042 SF = 0.2535 acre Landscape: 3,478 SF = 0.0798 acre Pervious: Net Increase 11,042 SF = 02535 acre Impervious Surface Breakdown Existing: Raw Land(C=0.10) 14,520 SF TOTAL 14,520 SF Proposed: Roof(C=0.70) 5,040 SF Paving(C=0.80) 370 SF Permeable pavers(C=0.55) 5,632 SF Landscape(0.10) 3,478 SF TOTAL 14,520 SF CALCULATION BASE VALUES,see attached sheet Figure A-2, Santa Clara County Drainage Manual Mean Annual Precipitation(MAP) 15 in TOC, see next page 5 Min WEIGHTED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT(C) Pre-development RUNOFF COEFFICIENT(C=0.10) Post-development RUNOFF COEFFICIENT(C=0.50) Time of concenteration=To*erland+Tpipe Pipe length=228' Slope=0.02 C=140 for smooth pipe D=4" V=1.318*C*RA0.63*SA0.54=1.318*140*(1/12)^0.63*(0.01)^0.54=3.2 fps (Ref. Fluid Mechanics&Hydraulics by Ronald V. Giles, 2 nd Edition) Tpipe=228/3.2=71 sec=1.2 Min Toverland=(1.8*(1.1-C)*sq-root(L))/(S*100))^113=(1.8(1.1-.55)sq-root of 35')/2^1/3=5.86 Min (recommended by ASCE) Tc=5 Min. is used for this calc. Q post develop=CIA=0.5*2.9*0.3333=0.483 CFS Q pre develop= 0.1*2.9*0.3333=0.097 CFS Q difference=0.387 CFS Q delt t 0.483 CFS 0.097 CFS 10 Min (delta t)/10=0.387/0.483 Delta t=8 Min Storage Volume Req'd=0.5*0.387*8*60=92.88 CF With a void ratio of 0.35 for gravel,gravel volume req'd=92.88/0.35=265 cubic feet Permeable interlocking Pavers volume storage capacity provided based on 90%of paved area and 20% Infilteration rate=0.20x0.90 x(370 SF+5632SF)x(0.35 Void Ratio)x(8"/12 thick open-graded base)=252 CF OK Also front retention basin provided with a storage capacity of 10x5x4x0.35=70 cubic feet (10%of paved area is used for concrete gutters and concrete paving against the building) co Drainage Manual 2007 County of Santa Clara, California IDF for M.A.P.of 16 Inches 10 1 D. c c c m c cc 0.1 -—B—2-Year �—5-Year —X---10-Year —t—25-Year —--8--50-Year --40—100-Year 0.01 , 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Duration(hours) Figure B-3:IDF for M.A.P.of 16 Inches 8/14/2007 B-4 Santa Clara Valley C.3 Stormwater Handbook Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program Attachment IV-1 Sizing for Flow-Based Treatment Controls Section B—Sizing Flow-Based Treatment Controls based on the California Stormwater BMP Handbook Flow Approach This method uses the Rational Method equation to determine the design flow: Q=CIA Where: Q=the design flow in cubic feet per second(cfs), C=the drainage area runoff coefficient, I =the design intensity(in/hr),and A=the drainage area for the BMP(acres) Step 1. Determine the drainage area for the BMP,A= ae s Step 2 Determine the runoff coefficient,C=f ; lfrom Table 3a or 3b It is more accurate to compute an area-weighted"C-factor"based on the surfaces in the drainage area(Table 3a),if possible,than to assume a composite"C-factor"such as those in Table 3b,especially for small drainage areas. Step 3. Determine from Figure 1 the mean annual precipitation(MAPS;C)at the project site location: (see Section II. Step 4 for more explanation.) MAPsite= ` i,.,. ' ,$1 Step 4 Identify the reference rain gage closest to the project site from the following list and record the MAPgage: MAPgage= 1.3.9 inches) Reference Rain Mean Annual Gages Precipitation(MAPgage) (in) San Jose Airport 13.9 Palo Alto 13.7 Gilroy 18.2 Morgan Hill 19.5 Step 5 Determine the rain gage correction factor for the precipitation at the site using the information from Step 3 and Step 4. Correction Factor=MAP,ite/MAPgage=(Step 3)/(Step 4) Correction Factor= E O 79` IV.Treatment Control Sizing Criteria Attachment N-1—Page 2 FINAL Torms G 8cD Flow worksheet doc May 20,2004 Santa Clara Valley C.3 Stormwater Handbook Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program Attachment IV-1 Sizing for Flow-Based Treatment Controls Section B—California Stormwater BMP_Iandbook Flow Annroach (continued) Step 6 Select the design intensity,I,for the reference gage closest to the site from the following list: I,Design Rainfall Intensity= ' ► Gages 85th Percentile Hourly Design Rainfall Rainfall Intensity Intensity (in/hr) (1) (in/hr) San Jose Airport 0.087 0.17 Palo Alto 0.096 0.19 0.11 0.21 Gilroy 0.12 0.24 Morgan Hill The design intensity is twice the 85th percentile Hourly Rainfall Intensity. Step 7. Determine the corrected design rainfall intensity(I)for the site: Design intensity(site)=Correction factor*Design rainfall intensity for closest rain gage Design intensity(site)=(Step 5)*(Step 6)= in/hr Step 8. Determine the design flow(0)using the Rational Method equation: Q=C*I*A Q=(Step 2) *(Step 7)* (Step 1) Q=.0q2q acres-in/hr Design Flow, Q = G,O ZtI cf1'. 1 No conversion factor for correct units is needed for the rational formula because(1 acre-in/hr)*(43,560 sq.ft/acre)*(1ft/12 in)*(lhr/3600 sec) 1 ft 3/sec or cfs. IV.Treatment Control Sizing Criteria Attachment N-1—Page 3 FINAL 7:UandDev\Forms\G&D\Flow woriaheecdoc May 20,2004 VA C.3 Stormwater Handbook Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program Table 3a—Estimated Runoff Coefficients for Various Surfaces During Small Storms(CDM,2003) Surface Runoff Coefficient (C Factor) Concrete 0.80 Asphalt 0.70 Pervious Concrete 0.60 Cobbles 0.60 Pervious Asphalt 0.55 Natural Stone(without grout) 0.25 Turf Block 0.15 Brick(without grout) 0.13 Unit Pavers on Sand 0.10 Crushed Aggregate 0.10 Grass 0.10 Roofs(from WEF/ASCE, 1992) 0.75 Notes: The above C-factors were estimated by selecting the lower range of the best available C-factor for each paving surface.These C-factors are only appropriate for small storm treatment BMP design,and should not be used for flood control sizing.Where available,locally developed small storm C-factors for various surfaces should be used. Table 3b—Estimated Composite Runoff Coefficients for Small Storms by Land Use(WEF/ASCE,2003) Description of Area Runoff Coefficient (C Factor) Business: Neighborhood 0. 0 Downtown 1.7 i) Residential: Single Family 0.30 Multi-unit,detached 0.40 Apartment 0.50 Multi-unit,attached 0.60 Industrial: Light 0.50 Heavy 0.60 Parks,cemeteries 0.10 Playgrounds 0.20 Unimproved 0.10 Notes: The above C-factors were estimated by selecting the lower range of the runoff coefficients listed for various land uses in,WEF/ASCB2_1992.Where available,locally developed small storm C-factors for various land uses should be applied. W.Treatment Control Sizing Criteria Attachment IV-1—Page 1 FINAL 1:\LandDev\Forms\G&D\Flow wo ksheetdoc May 20,2004 • • 000.0111110-1111."1' }' t i J. ,\--'4‘!.0,:-,.,-'44.,., „-•$ 4. & '-t o Y I- ,F*4,,t:.:.- yp s fi. ^.r le` •apt ,,+S h '+ .,' h,tS M ,, $. ,,',"--61%,..,,, '5 I,7a"' ' +"a r �'� `.l - ,, ,7�y _l�� V'�i • 'z r: I°" qtr `` _ � `L�, ti�14 a 4 = �! �g?,,r'i e,{II _ I. < {t 'rt ° ,' fr -}2'.. 1 y rip 5 :e x,.,.' °-g +*"� i FilikEr dA�'"�;."''{ —47 't { : 3'L, ' .I%°a "�' -a� �,.' .4,,,,,..,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,'N,....1 `,. 14 � '`'� r +�-n'r� z *ay �,��,,,, . a • Y'''';i310.4,`' p t3 'lli +" 4 sp ti� s , qs;3'a°+ a� " c n 4 `t� A!" y zy r �t �( � d'�`xr �' *Y �.•' t� ° ° �., Y, ,�. ' \-: f, ^., tom. \tl ,,aC e:�# r ,Tt :x h��;.-r`a, �° 1~ L -i•-j•,;•-'4.0,;•„•.i, .q �R i`4':° L',,s'"i y , e' "r`, !a8_s,.X07..,a 4�'�' . e'-Y, r .«\^ '' $ $-tom.,r,-4,: ,,,,,,r1;.,, „«z �;-. �. . :� \ �..c',•• 'T i,°e:J+s 3.1 t7 -I }Z + ;•lit 3, O ;."'o� 'Y,r , a r'. #c '$n, .,.'y: 7t `�, e1�°'. . "F'. :co„.-,.:s 7.,?�, ! k.l (.`i .'�.1R'5v, ,r',, '� ..i fA 1 t.," „tIx + ,a ,' 1 .,1{�}+ '��' $.r „,y',� =b,-,,,,,I,,-,,.• a.:r. ^'' '� a�L.1,,a� . 1 *o-s�4 n s`\.:w g'++r� ,,,, 'sw °t e� �� 1� ° r ) nti{t 41♦ J _ r} h ';'„,..-',7:,.:: '4° ,a 't"�'.� �<� it 7i 7 ,41nu ��r :M : �y�� Tp' r" b\ d y k ', 1'. $ y j' �1 ' �\� 1 4> wt , ' t e: , „ .‘,..,,I.., � '` 1 i „\, ,-,„,.. t`t l e,� e �` ,, 3' . , ;efz ,*7 ,K r . ".ill -'41' i ' .4 1 4, RI NVAIl t8ffig. x '. 4�,e,.,f' �� ���i t t .5 4 '"l l 9a ` A' yr�t, zr 1�, I ,L,`, '100 � � 71�L .°� �l�i I� IIY \� } Vt �i' F _ I 'Ir �/ .,�J� s_�, 3„I � S I ' �J \ 1) %AV 1. '; l d �".� ,7 I IT�t',I' 'd aViwA's' v. Y., II t Ntig�Rp " y `, Diu ₹:�I �, •y• NSZ1ibLi _ll'tk III ' r 03 * - 1,L\ ` , RI, -fir �4 \mil"'�- . . ...t I r .x L m ` y�� 1 a �1. J 01. i yPoy:.t�vC `+t w..„T.,, v�vr,�t„,I t*a'. ,y F" '\, s �,,.�. Figure 1 �w"�I �m� +s q45 � 1j `r ` PI 7 f)1," p�.y 1:s0., l N i� ��' 1.., e 9 .yap, `1,. � ,yd Soil Texture and Mean ."" 9 " , rVa , ,a t�ti:, ;.y, -: ',..! 4 .1,it*: . .. . ..- , ..., .,.-- , ;(<': ,.', , .. '...i..-•-; . . Annual Precipitation Depths " ' w �_, , ����� 1" for the Santa Clara Basin LC" o� '•' ' ^ +'` �" rY y w Legend I'? ° x dr .- $ ,"� •��i n'n ',x Soil Texture �v I 9ti y', 4 MRCS Hydrologic Soil Group) �-_.� RE Clay(D) /V Street or Highway a Sandy Clay(D) /�/Stream ' , r ,,,:_;‘,,3-..,.„ 'IP,A'" ` ./! L—I Clay Loam(D) f-1 Jurisdictional Boundary '- + �' Silt Loam(B) o Rain Gage ���� �,—_ _ii...:,•„�Loam(B) �o�s' Mean Annual Precipitation Depths(Inches) ::,. • `mr i ? e ,. ` ° :: .; 7 4: ,ata Source:Santa Clare Valley Water Diatdcte , "`4 - + �'�',�� `` Ievised March 2004 - \ r ��. �° rT Santa Clare Valley1,,,,,,,:,. " t '','.',41\,,,',,',, �� �:', '�` �"`\t..- y, 0 1 2 3 4 5 Mlles - ,,, ` y��'I, _ Urbon RunoQ ve Pollution Prevendon Pmgrsm ,1 ', r \ , ,, .k s ' Pavement Design: Subgrade R value based on soil classification from soil report and attached chart: R=15 Subgrade classification,see attached;Category 6 Provided 8 inches of base capable of handling ESL(x1000)=100 and Traffic Index of 6.8 Figure 6 which also includes Table 2.AASHTO Lifetime ESALs(Caltrans TI) strength ranges for soils \\ `₹f\ %‘‘,.. L q \ classified using the Unified � �1 � � ` �i����` �`� 4 �v�` (ASTM D2487),and AASHTO , ` '4 t tai'lV t t tp `" i t N i�0 ! � t methods. � itV 1,449 q.917 0 k- iectol's � �A � . The ASCE standard uti- ` Aq, s yg'4` ,i a!k*„ ,t+I V 11 � lizes eight categories ofsub 4 , 7,500,000! ` 2,800,000 �,1,300,000 430,000= Urban l (11 4) (10 2) (9 3) (8 1)W grade quality ranging from good quality gravels and 4« .1;+'3,5'00 000 1,500000 , 550 000 h 280,000 rockwithexcellentdrainage .4 i Dural Mn (10c5) (9 4) ' ,; (8 4) k(7 7) , to poor quality clay materials that are semi-impervious to water. Subgrade types are classified according to the Unified Soils Classification method Once the general subgrade type has been selected,then (ASTM D2487).Soil categories in Table 3 are from the stan- thedrainage quality ofthesubgrade and pavementstructure dard and are provided to the user for guidance only.Actual is characterized (See Table 4). Depending on the type of laboratory characterization of subgrade properties for each subgrade,the strength of the pavement may be reduced if project is recommended. Designers are cautioned against there is excess water in the subgrade.The standard includes making generalizations. an adjustment to the resilient modulus of the subgrade Subgrade Soil Poor Mediu y Good Excellent Category \/� nil,(ksi) 1 5 2 5 4 5 (611 13 15 25 33 43 50 60 CBR(%) I1 2f I 1110 115 20 I 4p Q0 810 .00 I I I Figure 6.Typical Resilient R-Value 1 i I 11 i I11P a a)o J 410 lo 810 10 Modulus Correlations to Empirical Soil Properties and A-1-b A-1-a Classification Categories. A-2-7 A-2-6 A-2-5 A-2-4 From Guide for Mechanistic- I I A-3 Empirical Design of New AASHTO Soil I A-4 Classification and Rehabilitated Pavement (M-145) A-5 A-6 I I Structures,Appendix CC-1: A-7-6 A-7-5 "Correlation of CBR Values with Soil Index Properties," CH National Cooperative MH I Highway Research Program, ML Transportation Research sw I Board,National Research I SP Council,authored byARA, Unified Soil SW-SC Classification I sW-SM Inc.,Champaign,Illinois, (ASTM 02487) SP-SC I March 2001.Chart is modified SP-S from the National Asphalt SC I I I sM Pavement Association I GW Information Series 117, I GP GW-GC "Guidelines for Use of HMA I GW-GM Overlays to Rehabilitate PCC I GP-GC Pavements,"1994. GP-GM I I GC I I I I i GM„ ICPI Tech Spec 4 Page 6 Table 3.General Soil Categories and Properties(ASCE2010) e • B'rt e 6 sT, +10 ik � lass :ic t s 'ar C �I 1s1 10,T1g Rock rock fill shatteredrock,boulders/ "1 Boulders/cobbles • Excellent None cobbles Well jaded ravels ands nds suitable 2 GW SW g g aExcellent Negligible " k ° " aS granularE borrWi e t R' ".E.v m �t v ei 3 GP SP Poorly graded:gravels and sarids ,. Excellent to fair Negligible toslight Singht t0f, Mt .'1 4 ;�$ GM SM Silty gravels and sands a „ � semiimpervious moderate 7� Practically impervi 5 GC, SC g T Clayey gravels and sands ous Negligible to slight 6{ ;F ML,MI Siltswand sandy silts , o- I Typically poor s $evere 4 Low plasticity clays and compressible Practically 7 CL MHO $light tQsevere silts. 'x impervious ' ' ' �` .Semi Impervious t0 f r "8 N CV CHI Medium to high plasticity clays' �., Negligibl'e to severe A x. Impervious Table 4.Pavement Drainage According to Soil Category (ASCE2010) tion 3.6 ofthe standard.Unbound base materials are required ""':1:" zr.t. .:470..1 to have a maximum loss of 60%when tested in accordance Q13aIrt: of 0'1 Ga ego n, a rrad t D I`n, with CSA A23.2-29A(Micro-Deval abrasion)and a maximum DD rac�ge it q u loss of 40%when tested in accordance with ASTM C 131 or CSA A23.2-17A(Los Angeles abrasion). Fair'; �7 days 3 4 � The required plasticity index is a maximum of 6 and the maximum liquid limit of 25 when tested in accordance with �:.�,Poorx�.,,., ... • ,.lzmontn„ w-.. ,5,6.?.��,.,,... ASTM D4318 and AASHTOT-89 andT-90.For constructability purposes,the minimum design unbound base thickness is 4 in.(100 mm)for traffic less than 500,000 ESALs and 6 in.(150 based on the overall quality of the pavement drainage,as mm)for 500,000 or higher ESALs.Figure 7 illustrates a typical shown in Table 5. cross section with an unstabilized,dense-graded base. Selection of Base Material—The next step in the design For bound or treated bases, asphalt-treated base (ATB) process is selecting thetype of base material forthe pavement. and cement-treated base(CTB)materials and installation are The standard supports the use of bound and unbound bases. required to conform to provincial,state or local specifications For unbound dense-graded bases, the aggregates are required to be crushed,angular materials.Crushed Table 5.Resilient Modulus(Mr),R-Values and CBRs for Subg rade Drainage Conditions • aggregate bases used in highway (ASCE2010) construction are generally suitable • for interlocking concrete pavement, Gbpd �� � . FairPooT� �� a"sl�ll`�� and unbound base materials should ' provincial or a. Mr �R GBR� �( Mr �R CBR meet the local state, pANN a �� �1MP8}k�, o municipal standards governing base 1 90 21 • 70• 16 .9 ' materials. -.__- Where local specifications are 2 80 19 11, 70 16 9 50 11 .�5 unavailable,the base material is re- . 3 •-•;:, 70 16 9 50 quiredto meetthe gradation require ments according to ASTM D 2940 4 50 ll 5 35 .. 7 3 30 62' Table6includestheserequirements. The minimum required strength of 30 6, 2- 25 4 2 18 3 1 the unbound base is a CBR of 80% or equivalent bearing strength as 7 27 - 5 2 -. 20 3 1 15 2 1 • described bythetest methods in Sec- 8 25- 20, 3 1- 15 2 1 ICPI Tech Spec 4 Page 7 ''' Table 8—Continued from p. 71 t,,,,',,,,„ -3 �i,�i `�,C"a°S2'� N @ E„ , T 11 / 3 S , ; ? a a,t 9 1 .�e, ,. „9 9 � 1 06 , 7 11 Zy `'1/ @&0 B94 998 C@G 144. k} - s Rey �. '< �; ' 14 '�` '''a ,e 'Aft� ''''o-"9,;',,,... C `R � we£w a�.��e'e_�� -° �a @ a :R via � �. �.? *,.- , ",-`�' was aw Pavers and Bedthng 105 105 105 105 105 105 y, , 105 105 105, 105 Good Unbound Dense-graded Base 100 100 X100 125; 175 150 X150 150 :°; :::,.:1 ,,,c),:.;.. 150 Unbound Dense graded :- 0:- 0 o'',.;;-,,k, ,,,,,• -:0,,,,. ...<,0. X150 275 , 375 ' 550 700 ,, Subbase Pavers and Bedding 105 105 105. 105 105 105 :105 105 106 1,05 ` Fair Unbound}Dense=graded Base 100 ..'•:',.,,,100.-:',1 }125 175 100 150 150 150 .; '.':,--1.,'8,i''': '..:;-:-•', '150 Unbound Dense-graded,. c� , 0.,, O, 0-r ,,..-,,,:1,.0,.,,,,,,, 200 ..275 °.375 '�` 500 � 700 . 825 Subbase PaversandBedding y J 105• 105 105. 105;, 105 ;,105 •:105 ,,r 105 105`; , 105, .T Pordr Unbound Dense-gradedBase, 100 "100 150 200 ,. 100 150 =150 150 -,....15-0-,,,t, " 150"'F _. Unbound Dense gradek. d 0 0 D. 0.,' 275 325 450 600 775 925 Subbase � �. ,_. � ;� W � q , � -„ - PaVers and Bedding, 105 , 105 105 105 • 105 1.05 -105a z",-.105- .F 105. ''''"'10'5-:-• :.Good Unbound Dense;gradedBase 1007 ...v-..,„100 125, 175 G x100, ,150 `150 ;` 150 ' ::r1,6-6,--:,,---.. ,J50 Unbound Dense graded 0,,, 0'" 0;° 0200 275 =''375 ' 500. . 700 825 0 Subbase � Pave"rs and Bedding" 105 105 105 1Q5 105 :105 '105 ,' 105 :' 105' :.105 , Fair Unbound Dense-graded Base. '100 100 1150;200 100 150 ,150 , 150 150,. 150 , Unbound Dense``=graded 0% 0•° 0 0,d 275 t "`325 450 600 775 } 925 Subtiase G •Pavers and Bedding ; ' '105 105 105, 105 � . '105 105 -•`105 105 " '105 • -` - , 105 'Poor Unbound Dense-graded Base 100 .150 X100 . ,100 ,100 X150 >150 150 r�- 150:: 1:50 Unbound Dense graded°-, . ,' 0 -0 175•_ 275 , ;375 475 <600 " 750-„ 950. 11.00 �.Subbase - �, � - , Pavers and Bedding .a 105 ,105 1 S105 105 1Q5 1;05 x.105 105, 105,' 705 'Good Unbound Dense graded"Base° ;100 100 =150 200 1`00: 150 150 150' 150 150` Unbound Dense graded e • ,, 25 • -.:, Subbase 0. .0. 0 ,0., 250 300 ;.425 : •550 ', x 750 875 "- Pavers and Bedding•,, x105 105 .105 , ;,105 ,,.',-,1,0"5:,,r -105 `_105 :...:,',',,1'05',.' 's„ 1,05, '..,:,,:2,,,i..„805::,`,• Unbound Dense: raded Base ;1'00 725 ',200' fair g 100 100 150 ;150 150 *150','. 1$0 ' Unbound Dense-graded,.` cz . 0 p0` :'0` 250 350 '425, 550 . 700°" 875,- . 1;050 Subbase. .: , Pavers and 8eddmg 1:05 105 1.05 105 _ 1;05 :105 ,105 105 R 105 105 Poor Unbound Dense graded•Base " 125 `-175 j 100 100 100 150 150 150.' .. X150 K , 150 Unbound Dense-graded—. '0 0' 225 -350 450 ,550 °"700 ,,` 825 ; 1025. 1200 ..r _ subbase , Pavers and,Bedding . :105,, 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 1 105' , 105 Unbound Dense=graded Base' 100 .. -Good .. 00 ,,`,•. `15,0 ---,,-,?pc f,,,,:: 100 z, �,,150 ' 150 '' � 150. _• 150 ` 'x150 ` ' -Unbound Dense-graded ' . 0 - -,0' , ` 0 °' •0ll' '=275`' '325'' , 450 ' 600 775 925. Subbase Pavers and Bedding 105 105 105 105 105 106 '105 -,14',-,- 105 105., 105 o Unbound Dense=graded Base ' '.100,'", 125 I 200 `, 100 ,' 100' ,150 150, 150 150, 150` Fair,. Unbound Dense-graded ;x '0 0 `0l 250 •350 425 "'550 700,° 875° .1050 ` $utibase , PaversandrBedding ,°- -705 ' 105 105'; 105 - 105 I-�' 105 - :105-" ' 105 :,105: 105 Poor Unbound Dense,graded;Base 7125 111571 100, ti 100 ti100 ,150 `,,150 150 1, .150. ,=1.50 Unbound Dense=graded : 0 ...`,0 225 350 450 550 '?700 825' ' 1025 1200 - , . -Subbase, , . , . ICPI Tech Spec 4 Page 12 1L) d-) C- -A0 -30717 SIZING FOR VOLUME BASED TREATMENT DMA# A= '' 14520 s.f. Impervious Area= "° 8888 s.f. %Imperviousness(i)= 61.21% Pervious Pavement Area= 5632 s.f. MAPsite=I 151 Correction Factor= 1.07914 MAPgage= 13.9 P6(gage):I 0.512 I in P6(site)=P6(gage)x Correction Factor P6(site): 0.552518 in Cw=0.8581^3—0.78i^2+0.774i+0.04 Cw: 0.4183102 Regression Factor(a) a=I 1.963 1(48 hour draw down) Po=a x Cw x P6(site) Po: 0.453696 in. Design Volume= Po x A x 1 ft/12in Design Volume= 548.9724 ftA3 SELF RETAINING (PERVIOUS PAVEMENT) Min. Storage Pervious≥ Porosity of Depth 1/2 Rock* Required Impervious** (in) 0.40 2.92 =Yes Minimum Storage Depth= Design Volume(c.f.)/Pervious Pavement Area(s.f.)/rock porosity x 12 in/1 ft * Porosity of Class II Permeable=0.4 based on SCVUURP training. ** If value="No"increase size of pervious pavement. �s. 8`I oe '�-oCvc- �r�` - Pry. `�' �Z.9 2.-tio�. HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS Number of pages -1g---including cover For New two story office Building 95 E. Hamilton Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 SIONAL Qq.\ g1ANI Ftic� o .Kog. Sr,,4— MFA Engineers & Associates 3001 S. Winchester Blvd, Suite B Campbell, CA 95008 Date November 15, 20017 SITE INFORMATION GROSS STUDY AREA 14520 SF = 0.3333 acre IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATIONS Existing Impervious: 0.00 SF = 0.0 0 0 acre Pervious: 14,520 SF = 0.3333 acre Proposed Impervious: 11,042 SF = 0.2535 acre Landscape: 3,478 SF = 0.0798 acre Pervious: Net Increase 11,042 SF = 02535 acre Impervious Surface Breakdown Existing: Raw Land(C=0.10) 14,520 SF TOTAL 14,520 SF Proposed: Roof(C=0.70) 5,040 SF Paving(C=0.80) 370 SF Permeable pavers(C=0.55) 5,632 SF Landscape(0.10) 3,478 SF TOTAL 14,520 SF CALCULATION BASE VALUES,see attached sheet Figure A-2,Santa Clara County Drainage Manual Mean Annual Precipitation(MAP) 15 in TOC,see next page 5 Min WEIGHTED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT(C) Pre-development RUNOFF COEFFICIENT(C=0.10) Post-development RUNOFF COEFFICIENT(C=0.50) Time of concenteration=Toveriand+Tpipe Pipe length=228' Slope=0.02 C=140 for smooth pipe D=4" V=1.318*C*R^0.63*S^0.54=1.318*140*(1/12)^0.63*(0.01)^0.54=3.2 fps (Ref.Fluid Mechanics&Hydraulics by Ronald V.Giles,2 nd Edition) Tpipe=22813.2=71sec=1.2 Min Toveriand=(1.8*(1.1-C)*sq-root(L))/(S*100))^1/3=(1.8(1.1-.55)sq-root of 35')/2^1/3=5.86 Min (recommended by ASCE) Tc=5 Min.is used for this calc. Q post develop=CIA=0.5*2.9*0.3333=0.483 CFS Q pre develop= 0.1*2.9*0.3333=0.097 CFS Q difference=0.387 CFS Q Belt t 0.483 CFS 0.097 CFS 10 Min (delta t)/10=0.387/0.483 Delta t=8 Min Storage Volume Req'd=0.5*0.387*8*60=92.88 CF With a void ratio of 0.35 for gravel,gravel volume req'd=92.88/0.35=265 cubic feet Permeable interlocking Pavers volume storage capacity provided based on 90%of paved area and 20% Infilteration rate=0.20x0.90 x(370 SF+5632SF)x(0.35 Void Ratio)x(8"/12 thick open-graded base)=252 CF OK Also front retention basin provided with a storage capacity of 10x5x4x0.35=70 cubic feet (10%of paved area is used for concrete gutters and concrete paving against the building) Drainage Manual 2007 x £y: County of Santa Clara, California IDF for M.A.P.of 16 Inches 10 1 0.1 '—B-2-Year —U-5-Year 'X10 Year t25-Year —0—50-Year —6-100-Year 0.01 r 4 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Duration(hours) Figure B-3:IDF for M.A.P.of 16 Inches 8/14/2007 B-4 Santa Clara Valley C.3 Stormwater Handbook Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program Attachment 1V-1 Sizing for Flow-Based Treatment Controls r5' e w B— 2z `1 � e+ i e e as r l o e I zcx for n � �t1P E , t This method uses the Rational Method equation to determine the design flow: Q=CIA Where: Q=the design flow in cubic feet per second(cfs), C=the drainage area runoff coefficient, I =the design intensity(in/hr),and A=the drainage area for the BMP(acres) Step 1. Determine the drainage area for the BMP,A :,40fe Step 2 Determine the runoff coefficient,C= ` __ om Table 3a or 3b It is more accurate to compute an area-weighted"C-factor"based on the surfaces in the drainage area(Table 3a),if possible,than to assume a composite"C-factor"such as those in Table 3b,especially for small drainage areas. Step 3. Determine from Figure 1 the mean annual precipitation(MAPsite)at the project site location: (see Section II. Step 4 for more explanation.) MAPS1e= 1:117. * Step 4 Identify the reference rain gage closest to the project site from the following list and record the MAPgage: MAPgage=x [_ Reference Rain Mean Annual Gages Precipitation(MAPgage) (in) San Jose Airport 13.9 Palo Alto 13.7 Gilroy 18.2 Morgan Hill 19.5 Step 5 Determine the rain gage correction factor for the precipitation at the site using the information from Step 3 and Step 4. Correction Factor=MAPsire/MAPgage=(Step 3)/(Step 4) Correction Factor= `.. _ IV.Treatment Control Sizing Criteria Attachment IV-1—Page 2 FINAL ,:uananevT«mtc&now, n .aoc May 20,2004 Santa Clara Valley C.3 Stormwater Handbook Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program Attachment IV-1 Sizing for Flow-Based Treatment Controls Section B—California Stormwater BMP Handbook Flow Approach (continued) Step 6 Select the design intensity,I,for the reference gage closest to the site from the following list: I,Design Rainfall Intensity= ► t Gages 85a`Percentile Hourly Design Rainfall Rainfall Intensity Intensity ('in/hr) m (. ) San Jose Airport 0.087 0.17 Palo Alto 0.096 0.19 Gilroy 0.11 0.21 Morgan Hill 0.12 0.24 The design intensity is twice the 85th percentile Hourly Rainfall Intensity. Step 7. Determine the corrected design rainfall intensity(I)for the site: Design intensity(site)=Correction factor*Design rainfall intensity for closest rain gage Design intensity(site)=(Step 5)*(Step 6)=r` in/hr Step 8. Determine the design flow(O)using the Rational Method equation: Q=C*I*A Q=(Step 2) *(Step 7)*(Step 1) Q,0 /2q acres-in/hr Design Flow, Q =ft ell: 1 No conversion factor for correct units is needed for the rational formula because(1 acre-in/hr)*(43,560 sq.ft/acre)*Oft/12 in)*(1hr/3600 sec) 1 ft3/sec or cfs. IV.Treatment Control Sizing Criteria Attachment N-1—Page 3 FINAL J:UrdDev\Fomms1G&D\Flowworksheetdoc May 20,2004 egoffi 'lj C.3 Stormwater Handbook Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program Table 3a—Estimated Runoff Coefficients for Various Surfaces During Small Storms(CDM,2003) Surface Runoff Coefficient (C Factor) Concrete 0.80 Asphalt 0.70 Pervious Concrete 0.60 Cobbles 0.60 Pervious Asphalt 0.55 Natural Stone(without grout) 0.25 Turf Block 0.15 Brick(without grout) 0.13 Unit Pavers on Sand 0.10 Crushed Aggregate 0.10 Grass 0.10 Roofs(from WEF/ASCE, 1992) 0.75 Notes: The above C-factors were estimated by selecting the lower range of the best available C-factor for each paving surface.These C-factors are only appropriate for small storm treatment BMP design,and should not be used for flood control sizing.Where available,locally developed small storm C-factors for various surfaces should be used. Table 3b—Estimated Composite Runoff Coefficients for Small Storms by Land Use(WEF/ASCE,2003) Description of Area Runoff Coefficient (C Factor) Business: Neighborhood 00 Downtown 0.7 Residential: Single Family 0.30 Multi-unit,detached 0.40 Apartment 0.50 Multi-unit,attached 0.60 Industrial: Light 0.50 Heavy 0.60 Parks,cemeteries 0.10 Playgrounds 0.20 Unimproved 0.10 Notes: The above C-factors were estimated by selecting the lower range of the runoff coefficients listed for various land uses' WEF/ASCE, 2.Where available,locally developed small storm C-factors for various land uses should be app ie . IV.Treatment Control Sizing Criteria Attachment W-1—Page 1 FINAL 1:VmilDev\Fo vK'i&D11owwodshee.doc May 20,2004 '`�'k'-�. �`t/��t` •»tx���. r«+� a�,�r z s I fsF t k ��u *i. rk . �Op '�f �KiI f�"9 i�- y �1 '. tat „ a .,firIr,;":14, ''', ,' 'I-..,;.';•',-':-,,,: •:.r., ,-,:.,..:,,,„,..,.,.....,.,.5-,,y�ty x �ty S r�`0,! i V % :Jr a rim il' a � 9a t,. :.`, II 3 .a U' 4, n I` �� f,ll X�+ f 'A �,t if ,-*" u ;;�� ice,, ':r. y� y�o'''''''4 ,"`, t,. y { 'r.'�. �.=1:-a i'Ci y,,. A,y MYw �I; a.) �'q• .1Yir a • \--,s-,--_ �} a�t \° ,:. t -k5x' t`y 1i4 -+ ,gym#g.�}>y. =k c c+, air r .4 y i I a. 'i..n s o-v . j 5 Y C i rr '°;, i kt fi t . V �' ;° «l. y'Y 1- 7. 1 sE. el', ry.'a:41:,:.),•:'•,;', -,':;:•4.1.:`. ;. ri ri 1�•F' Al n '•tl! '/r >rp• }x� r Pk t } 't z u fir r s ../"'t9' .` r " ail` i;,:IR yffi , s y:`��-, ':-.t"""'-'f,',' I n., {'t rr fr=;FI JtJJ �"4 ff�' , tl Y y -;;Is r 4' ] y"d :,, k ,: i t; E. , f t'',l j,, - , -.T i,a" ., *- �. 7a .r o,' l�v `'p?\�y.[[t a •', T i �, �: ' t,"°40,71.•:;;•%-_,-.0.,�F ' 1"N' ',, 1me. e .., ,, h'hJ, .t_ T f D,. ',,,, 4? ., tr, oF:r.•, ,L".4,-L7.":,;;2„,, a,' II -..„:'''''.4.3.i-,,,L,-,t; i . !,14 "'�}�1=U Iiiiii r �;. , ...,.. E,:'�' ts i yyy,' y i��"" '� ,.. rr c y le � y1'.. '('!'. \ t "^*, y,`. ., ' .\ I Ffi,.:,,,,.,..vW mt v ✓ s� • 'r... (4,,,s1b, '4,,, s+} lf �I ;gala -...1,:' Nv��} ys`b sy?•'.71,,,,,..` . k �._. . It �-�I}� u ,g .l . 'xw Cl,R,,b� fi, '�L-- ti� i ;+`\�'•`M ''4:, t ti " �(� r.�= `i 1, . gi ✓ �s'y V �1 U 1 t BEY }, l ly k ; �f\, v ,,4 �lt ::r�i I•, ...4-40,.?,1S\Ytfr Yy�• t �z,Y.. o 4t ,7;�, 11 'mhf�',,k1 yV i���Jp y ,.5.'`L.,•;„ A j KJi } ,, Soil Texture n ea -',114,1, , . � .�,L. •. �,m�,�, ,�,� ! �,9 {� , ' h yF� .;:•'"L; S Y xtu and Mean � k, Annual extur itati®n Depths ,; -°may ' , �'" �q� II,('� - ., 'G for the Santa Clara basin 'f,1 t � s� � , �N Legend ` ''H1INV4 a� ` I Soil Texture '. .''','"i:<:1',..;::':';'''''‘, .•-, E < ,�! � �' 4 �s 1 (NRCS Hydrologic Soil Group) �� ` '' f Clay(D) /�/Street or Highway .•i Sandy Clay(D) N Stream L';�°� • � ` = . i• •"1 Clay Loam(D) Jurisdictional Boundary ' 74. a; ,. �� �a Silt Loam(B) o Rain Gage a�� bs L Loam(B) Mean Annual Precipitation Depths(Inches) •, r. t FI } ,' 1 s r r„n• ..TA:,‘',:.,5a•-•,..•, k.'. \ , 4, .4..,,,, ,.:,?, t, Niii ', .,,,:". J.,•-,,,.:", .,..,,,',.-,: Data Source:Sente Clara Valley Water Dlatdct n + .::4)-(''.;" { ww , Revised March 2004 �. '•1 ihN ��;i 4 � 9anle Clara Valley i r�\ \\'''';,.. ,' t i tbuti Runoff 0 1 2 3 4 5 Mlles ',''''4•,-•'' `'� ° f1 r' Pollution Prevention Program c t H,, ` - Pavement Design: Subgrade R value based on soil classification from soil report and attached chart: R=15 Subgrade classification,see attached; Category 6 Provided 8 inches of base capable of handling ESL(x1000)=100 and Traffic Index of 6.8 • Figure 6 which also includes Table 2.AASHTO Lifetime ESALs(Ca/trans TI) strength ranges for soils classified using the Unified ,. "� "� 7 (ASTM D2487), rsenal , Commerelal/ andAA5HT0 � �x � � -'1'7\- � Ma)aY , IVlmor �;Q or Major ' .c;' Multl Fam y methods. , �° Collectors Collectors '� . - ;, Locals a The ASCE standard uti � ₹%eets 3 , lizeseightcategoriesofsub- Urban 7,500,000 2,800,000 ` 1,300,000 430,000 grade quality ranging from (11.4) (10.2) (9.3) (8.1) good quality gravels and 3,600,000 1,500,000 550,000 280,000 Rural rockwith excellent drainage °- (10.5) (9.4) ' (8.4) (7.7) to poor qualityclaymaterials that are semi-impervious to water. Subgrade types are classified according to the Unified Soils Classification method Once the general subgrade type has been selected,then (ASTM D2487).Soil categories in Table 3 are from the stan- dard and are provided to the user for guidance only.Actual is characterized (See Table 4). Depending on the type of laboratory characterization of subgrade properties for each subgrade,the strength of the pavement may be reduced if project is recommended. Designers are cautioned against there is excess water in the subgrade.The standard includes making generalizations. an adjustment to the resilient modulus of the subgrade Subgrade Soil Poor (v'e-liun\ Good Excellent Category ____-,M,(ksi) 1 5 2 13 4 5 f e13 M 13 1 23 3] 40 50 60-5 TcBR(%) I1 2 1 III 10 1 1 20 14 sl0 810 100 Figure 6.Typical Resilient R-Value 1 I I lip 1� a)0 2 alo slo 810 1qo Modulus Correlations to I Empirical Soil Properties and A-1-b A-1-a Classification Categories. A-2-7 A-2-6 A-2-5 A-2-4 From Guide for Mechanistic- I A-3 Empirical Design of New AASHTO Soil A-4 and Rehabilitated Pavement Classification A_5I (M-145) Structures,Appendix CC-1: A-6 A-7-6 A-7-5 "Correlation of CBR Values I I I I with Soil Index Properties," CH National Cooperative MH I Highway Research Program, ML Transportation Research sw I Board,National Research I SP Council,authored byARA, Unified Soil SW-SC Classification I SW-sM Inc.,Champaign,Illinois, (ASTM 02487) SP-SC I March 2001.Chart is modified I SP-SM SC I I from the National Asphalt I sM Pavement Association GW I Information Series 117, I GP GW-GC "Guidelines for Use of HMA I GW-GM Overlays to Rehabilitate PCC I GP-GC Pavements,"1994. I r GM I GC I I r GM i I ICPI Tech Spec 4 Page 6 • Table 3.General Soil Categories and Properties(ASCE2010) Cat go. g Wife oily �g F raecep r tiiv to lsao 1a ssi c tfo Beef D scr ptio Cl ac i t s s 'et e "pt s „e Rock;=rock fill'shattered rock, boulders/ 1 Boulders/cobbles " Excellent None cobbles Well graded gavels and sands suitable • 2 GW `SW Excellent Negligible as-granular borrow= `' • ` GP, SP Poorly"graded gavels and sands Excellent to fair Negligible to slight 4 GM SM • Silty gravels and sands' Fair to ° °Slight to ., __ 'semi• ds �odsrat Practically impervi 5� GC, bC Clayey gravels and sands Negligible•to"slight 6'; ML MI Silts"and sandysilts" Typically poor_ °severe • Low plasticity clays and compressible • Practically 7 CL MH .. . ° light to severe >° �,., . p : S • • Semi impervious to 8 CI CH Medium to high plasticity clays. °Negligible to• -severe -imperVrous �= - v Table 4.Pavement Drainage According to Soil Category (ASCE2010) tion 3.6 ofthestandard.Unbound base materials are required � - . ‘ %, to have a maximum loss of 60%when tested in accordance �Sorl"ategoi)•TP im;to, ra'� � •��� ° with CSA A23.2-29A(Micro-Deval abrasion)and a maximum a Dr�anage� € m fm Table. o loss of 40%when tested in accordance with ASTM C 131 or Good 1 day • 4 1,2,3 -, CSA A23.2-17A(Los Angeles abrasion). Fair 7,days 3,4 The required plasticity index is a maximum of 6 and the Poor 1 month 4 5,6,7;8 maximum liquid limit of 25 when tested in accordance with ASTM D4318 and AASHTO T-89 and 1-90.For constructability purposes,the minimum design unbound base thickness is 4 in.(100 mm)for traffic less than 500,000 ESALs and 6 in.(150 based on the overall quality of the pavement drainage,as mm)for 500,000 or higher ESALs.Figure 7 illustrates a typical shown in Table 5. cross section with an unstabilized,dense-graded base. Selection of Base Material—The next step in the design For bound or treated bases, asphalt-treated base (ATB) process is selecting thetype of base material forthe pavement. and cement-treated base(CTB)materials and installation are The standard supports the use of bound and unbound bases. required to conform to provincial,state or local specifications Forunbound dense-graded bases, the aggregates are required to be crushed,angular materials.Crushed Table 5.Resilient Modulus(M,),R-Values and CBRs forSubgrade Drainage Conditions aggregate bases used in highway (ASCE2010) pws construction are generally suitable alna e for interlocking concrete pavement, G ory �� oar $, Fat �Y � �aP00 a;g and unbound base materials should mrt, meet the local state, provincial or ,s (MPa) R3I GBR rMPa) d< R CBR ( Pa) t R CBR;, municipal standards governing base `, materials. Where local specifications are 2 80 19 1'1 70 16 9, 50`- °..11. 5 • unavailable,the base material is re- 3" 70 'x, '16° "9` 50 �' 11 �°5 : 35, 7 .�3 • • quired to meetthe gradation require- ments according to ASTM D 2940. 4 50 11 5 35 7 3 30 6 2 Table6includestheserequirements. 5 40``-. 8 4"" "30 - 6 2 ' 25„ 4 2 The minimum required strength of ^ 30 6 ° 2 25 .4 2 ` " 18 '3 - 1 the unbound base is a CBR of 80% - or equivalent bearing strength as • 7 27 5 2 x.2O' describedbythetestmethodsinSec- "8 25 4 2 20 3. 1 15 2 1 ICPI Tech Spec 4 Page 7 Table 8—Continued from p. 11 � \� ,. ` \ \ G R B C E $ o f 86.1 \\ "�N\\ a \,,. \\„ • \ .4� \,\Via` `Sn z"' N ,.�,i, \'A . Sic : � \\\*\ ` as a \ \ \\\ �. \ v'�,\\�nG \\s sa �\\� 1Q \''" \ \\ v tv Pavers and Bedding 105 105 105 105 1-0;"'' ''' 05 105 105 105 105 105 Good Unbound Dense-graded Base 100 100 100 125 175 150 150 150 150 150 Unbound Dense-graded ° 0 0 0 0 0 150 275 .•° 375 550•. 700 Subbase L, Pavers and Bedding 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 Fair Unbound Dense-graded Base ` 100 100 125 MN 100 150 150 150 150 150 Unbound Dense-graded Subbase 0 0 0 0 200 275 375 500 700, 825 Pavers and Bedding 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 Poor Unbound Dense-graded Base 100 100 150 200 100 150 150," 150 150 150 Unbound Dense-graded. 0 0 0 0 275 325 450 600 775 925 Subbase` Pavers and Bedding 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 Good Unbound Dense-graded Base a °100 100 125 2175 100 . 150 150, 150 150 150, Unbound Dense-graded 0 0 0 0 200 275 375 500 700 825 Subbase CD Pavers and Bedding 105 105 105 Ir05 105 105 105 105 105 105 Fair Unbound Dense-graded Base 100 100 I 150 �� 100 150 150 150 150 150 • f Unbound Dense-graded 0 0 0 0 325 450 600 925 Subbase Pavers and Bedding 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 Poor Unbound Dense-graded Base 100 150 100 100 100 150 150 150 150 150 Unbound Dense-graded 0 0 175 275 375 475 600 750 950 1100 Subbase Pavers and Bedding 105- 105 195 105 105 105 105 105 ,105, 105 Good Unbound Dense-graded Base 100 100 150 200 100 150 150 150 150 150 Unbound Dense-graded '- 0 0 , 0' 0 250 300 425 550 750" 875 Subbase r Pavers and Bedding 105 105 105 105 I 105 105 105 105 105 105 a Fair Unbound Dense-graded Base 100 125 200 100 100 150 150 150 150 150 Unbound Dense graded 0 0 i 0 250 350 425 550 700 875 1050 Subbase , Pavers and Bedding 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 Poor Unbound Dense-graded Base 125 175 100 100 ' 100 150 150 150 150 150 Unbound Dense-graded 0 0 225 350 450 550 700 • 825 1025 1200 Subbase Pavers and Bedding 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 105 I 105 Good IUnbound Dense-graded Base 100 100 150 200 100 . 150 • 150 150 ' 150 150 Unbound Dense-graded I 0 O 0 0 275 325 450 600 775 925 Subbase 0o Pavers and Bedding 105 105 105 105 105 105 ' '105 105 105 105 o Unbound Dense-graded Base 100 125 200 100 100 150 150 150 150 150 m Fair c Unbound Dense-graded 0 0 0 250 350 425 550 700 875 1050 Subbase Pavers and Bedding 105 105 105 105 105 I 105 105 105 105 105 Poor Unbound Dense-graded Base Egi 175 100 100 100 150 150 150 150 150 Unbound Dense-graded I 0 0 225 350 450 550 700 825 1025 1200 ;Subbase ICPI Tech Spec 4 Page 12 ENF""'IACHMENT PERMIT ISSUANCE CHECIc LIST City of Campbell Encroachment Permit No. ENI 2017-289 Department of Public Works Tract No. Address 95 E Hamilton Avenue ITEMS REQUIRED FOR PERMIT 1. D Encroachment Permit Application complete,with applicant signature and date(front and back) 2. D Permit Application Fee paid $425.00 Receipt Number&Date: 272846 12/14/17 3. D Plan Check Deposit Paid(2%of Engineer's Estimate,$500 min) $500.00 Receipt Number 272846 12/14/17 4. D Grading Plan Review Fee paid $1,185.00 Receipt Number&Date: 272846 12/14/17 5. D City Engineer's Estimate Completed and Submitted 6. D Four(4)Sets of Street Improvement Plans 7. D Four(4) Sets of Grading and Drainage Plans 8. O Check Lists(Grading and Drainage,Street Improvement) ITEMS REOUIRED PRIOR TO PUBLIC WORK CLEARANCE FOR BUILDING PERMITS ❑ Plan Check&Inspection Fee:Engineer's Estimate(EE)1 $51,000.001 ;if EE is<$250,000,then fee is 14%of EE. If EE≥$250,000,fee is Actual Cost+20%. $35,000 minimum deposit. Amount $7,140.00 Receipt No.&Date N✓T C t27 10. ❑ Security for Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials, 100%each of Engineer's Estimate, supplied or paid. Amount: $51,000.00 Form: Receipt No.&Date: `��� ❑ Security for Monumentation Amount: $0.00 Receipt No.&Date: 13�❑ Construction Emergency Cash Deposit: 4%of Engineer's Estimate. ($500 minimum,$10,000 maximum) Amount $2,040.00 Receipt No.&Date 13. ❑ torm Drainage Area Fee Amount $883.33 Receipt No.&Date 14. Lie Street Improvement Agreement signed and notarized(proof of ownership submitted) 15. VRight of Way Documents Completed and Fees Paid. ❑ PSE&S/W Easement D Street Dedication❑ R.O.S. Req'd? 16. ❑ All other Public Works requirements listed in the Conditions of Approval of the development. D PG&E App (SL) 17. V Other Fees,Payments,Deposits Amount $175 paid $565 due Receipt No.&Date 272846 12/14/17 C3 Sizing 18. ❑ SWPPP+NOI 19. ❑ C3 Certification 20. D Covenant Agreement and/or Maintenance Agreement 21. ❑ Geotech Letter 22. ❑ Storm Water Management Plan ITEMS REOUIRED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PERMIT: 23. ❑ Contractor's signature added to the permit application(front and back) 24. ❑ Contractor's City of Campbell Busines s License # 0 25. ❑ Worker's Compensation Insurance Information Sheet received from Contractor. 26. ❑ Certificate of Insurance with Additional Insured's Endorsement received from Applicant or Contractor. 27. ❑ One mylar set and six(6)or less sets of off-site plans signed by engineer,stamped APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION. ❑ Contractor ❑ Inspector ❑ PW Superintendent(Service Center) ❑ EP File ❑ LD File ❑ Signals&Lighting Supervisor(Service Center) 28. ❑ Permit signed by City Engineer. 29. ❑ INITIATE CHECK REQUEST FOR PLAN CHECK DEPOSIT REFUND WHEN ALL OF THE ABOVE ITEMS ARE COMPLETE,PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED. Issuer: Initial and date and file with permit J:\ andDev\Plan Check Comments\1 -Specific Projects-Active Project in Progress\Hamilton Ave E 95\fees\[Development Fees.xlsm]6-ENC Permit Issuance Checklist 4,.0F.C �� r7 4/3/2018 .� O . O c5. fklecn Public Works Department Development Fees .& Outstanding Information Project: 95 E Hamilton Avenue ENC 2017-289 Engineers Estimate All these fees only relate to Grading and Drainage and Street Improvement Plans. PART 1: ITEMS REQUIRED FOR PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESSING: 1. Encroachment Permit Application Completed and signed? CI Yes ❑ No 2. Permit Application Fee $425.00 Paid? 2 Yes ❑ No 3. Plan Check Deposit Paid(2%of EE, $500 min)$500.00 Paid? El Yes ❑ No 4. Grading.Plan Review Fee $1,185.00 Paid? E Yes : ❑ No PART 2: ITEMS REQUIRED PRIOR TO PUBLIC WORK CLEARANCE FOR BUILDING PERMITS 5. Plan Check&Inspection Fee {a),b), or c)} $7,140.00 Paid? ❑ Yes ❑ No a) If the EE<250k then 14% of the EE. b) If the EE< 500k then$35k+ 8% c) If the EE> 500k its $55k+ 7% 6. * Security for Faithful Performance&Labor and Material-100%EE..:. ..$51,000.00 . Paid? ❑ Yes ❑ No (These securities are retained by the City to insure the work is completed per the permit.Once the work is completed and the City accepts the improvements,the applicant may elect to have 75%of the deposit returned.25%is retained for a 1 year maintenance period.After 1 year,if there are no issues with the installed improvements,the rest is refunded See security options in the Notes.) 7. Security for Monumentation 100%of ME $0.00 Paid? ❑ Yes ❑ No (This is a deposit for the monuments that are shown to be set on a map for a project.Once the applicant's surveyor sets the monuments and provides the necessary documentation,City staff verifies to ensure consistency. If there are no inconsistencies then the deposit is released.) 8. -Construction-Emergency Cash Deposit 4% of EE $2,040.00 Paid? ❑ Yes El No 9. Storm Drainage Area Fee $883.33 Paid? 0 Yes ❑ No 10. NPDES Plan Review Fee I $740.00 Paid? ❑ Yes ❑ No paid$175 12/14/17 $565.00 balance due Project: 95 E Hamilton Avenue • ENC 2017-289 - Engineers Estimate (This is a fee for staff review of conformance with the requirements of the NPDES permit, ,C.3 provisions as they pertain to storm water discharge and Low Impact Development.) Projects that are sent to the consultant for review Consultant Cost+20% Page 1_of 3 11. Biotreatment Facility$300 ea $0.0',. ea.Paid? ❑ Yes ❑ M63/2018 . f. 12. Other Fees,Payments,Deposits - Paid? ❑ Yes ❑ No 13. Park Impact Fee Paid? - ❑ Yes ❑ No 75%of Park Impact Fee - $0.00 Paid? ❑ Yes ❑ No -25%of Park Impact Fee $0.00 Paid? ❑ ` Yes ❑ No 14. Street Improvement Agreement signed and notarized(proof of ownership submitted) 15. Right of Way Documents Completed: PSE&S/W Easement O Street Dedication ❑ R.0. S. Req'd? 16. All other Public Works requirements listed in the Conditions of Approval of the development. ❑ -PG&E APP(SL) 17. SWPPP+NOI Submitted/Apply? ❑ Yes 2 No 18. C3 Certification 'Submitted/Apply? ❑ Yes O No 19. Covenant Agreement and/or Maintenance Agreement Submitted/Apply? ❑ Yes LI No 20. Geotech Letter Submitted/Apply? ❑ Yes ❑ No 21. Storm Water Management Plan Submitted/Apply? ❑ Yes E, No PART 3: ITEMS REQUIRED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ENCROACHMENT PERMIT: 22. Contractor's signature added to the permit application(front and back) 23. Contractor's City of Campbell Business License # 24. Worker's Compensation Insurance Information Sheet received from Contractor. 25. Certificate of Insurance With Additional Insured's Endorsement received from Applicant or Contractor. 26. When the plans are APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION provide one mylar off-site plans signed and wet stamped by the engineer of record. Return the Mylar to the City for the City Engineer to sign the mylar as well. 27. Make SIX copies of the signed mylar plans and return it to the City for issuance. *Note: Security can be provided in one of three options (USING ONLY CITY'S BOND AND CD Forms): 1. Provide a Faithful Performance bond for $51,000.00 and a Labor and Materials bond for $51,000.00 (EE). (The City has the actual bond forms to use.) _ 2. Provide one CD for $51,000.00 (equal to the EE). The CD will be required to be assigned "for the benefit of"the City v City provided assignment form. 3. Provide the City with a cash deposit in the amount of $51,000.00 equal to the EE. Project: 95 E Hamilton Avenue _ - ENC 2017-289 Engineers Estimate Page 2 of 3 ' CITY OF CAMPBELL Print Form DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION 70 North First Street,Campbell,CA 95008 Ph. (408)866-2150;Fx.(408)376-0958 CHECKLIST FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS APPLICATION NO(S): ADDRESS: 9 - ® 14 r don v ' e-r"-4 Instructions: This checklist provides advance notification to applicants of the City of Campbell's final street improvement plans and submittal requirements. Using this checklist will expedite your application through the City's review process. Prior to submitting a final street improvement plan list to the City Engineer,please place an"X"in the space to the right of each item below to indicate you have complied with,or place"N/A"to indicate that the particular item doesn not apply. Review applicable sections,which are referenced in parentheses,before checking off each item. - - - SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF ENGINEER OF WORK I HEREBY.DECLARE THAT I AM THE ENGINEER OF WORK FOR THIS PROJECT,THAT I HAVE EXERCISED RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OVER THE DESIGN OF THE PROJECT,AND COMPLETION OF THIS CHECKLIST,AS DEFINED IN SECTION 6703 OF THE BUSINESS AND PROFESSION CODE,AND THAT THE DESIGN IS CONSISTENT WITH CURRENT STANDARDS. /2-14/-2.?,I ,F`�SS�PN Signature Date , � AA Printed Name: A Li f� vr 1a\� • RCE#: 9 Q f0 Expiration Date: ITEMS COMPLY NOT APPLY CITY COMMENTS I. GENERAL [1K 1. City standard off-site title sheet with applicable notes. 2. 24"X36"sheet size used,including City Standard rV "K borders and Blueprint for a Clean Bay Plan Sheet. [/K 3. Title Block/Scale/North Arrow Shown. 4. Plans capable of microfilm reproductions-minimum IT/OK ° 1/8 inch lettering. 5. Engineer's name,number,expiration date and 1—‘/K signature included on all sheets. �- 6. Vicinity Map shown(must be microfilmable). r'_ _K 7. Sheet Index and key map included for 3 or more [ OK f N/A sheets. 8. Limits of Public Works inspection clearly shown 1--�K - on plan,typical section,and bond estimate. • 9. Street Light locations/legend/Electric Service r OK f VN/A Connection Location shown. 10. Elevation tied to City benchmark. /OK Reference City benchmark. Page 1 of 6 ti COM''LY NOT APPLY CITY COMMENTS 11. Curb grade plans prepared by Public Works have been incorporated into improvment plans and OK - f ' N/A - verified as adequate. 12. Curb grade plans prepared by Engineer for review by Public Works and cross-sections @ 50'max.intervals OK j IN/A along road frontage and extending 150'min. beyond limits of work. Profile line,centerline,&EP 13. Signing and striping plan plus existing striping r° OK 177N/A included in improvement plans. 14. Development No.(SUB,MS,LUP,DP)shown on each - OK N/A sheet. 15. Verification and land rights for off-tract work(title OK /A report,recorded easement,etc.) 16. Permits required from other agencies(Fish&Game r OK 1/N/A CalTrans,Army Corps of Engrs,Flood Control,etc.) 17. Right of entry submitted for review for all off-tract r OK r N/A work. 18. Landscaping within the public right-of-way r.X - r N/A included in improvement plans. 19. Fence required along water district canals. r OK 1X/A II. ROADS A. TYPICAL SECTIONS 1. Street cross-section shown at 50'intervals maximum(closer intervals may be necessary per a OK 1V/N/A the City Engineer). Cross sections slopes shown. 2. Structural pavement design calculations submitted (per Caltrans Highway Design Manual)and r OK ✓/A correspond to plans. 3. Sidewalk,curb and gutter indicated with details rV'K r N/A included on plans. 4. Right-of-Way and street width dimensions shown. 1- UK • 5. 2:1 max.cut/fill slopes shown beginning at R/W r OK iN/A lines-Soils Report verifying exceptions. 6. Crown Slope indicated. r OK r-.7/N/A 7. Pedestrian or bike paths shown. I OK N/A 8. Pavement Design Chart shown with T.I. and R-values rl OK r/A for review. • Page 2 of 6 • B. PLAN VIEWS COMPLY NOT APPLY CITY COMMENTS r, OK IT/N/A 1. Radius of curvature shown on all curves. 2. 20'curb return radii shown for major thoroughfares r OK /N/A and industrial streets. 3. 24'min.curb opening for private road intersection. J - OK (7 N/A 4. Horizontal curves and sight distance designed per Highway Design Manual. I-- OK 141A shown. r OK f A 5. Cul-de-sac radii(35 min.) 6. Private road turnarounds shown. r K r N/A 7. R/W and street width dimension shown. r- 9k r N/A 8. Centerline stationing shown at 50'intervals. �. OK ✓OK 9. Curve info provided in table format(i.e.BC/EC station,offset,radius,and delta). tA OK I N/A 10. Lot/parcel lines and numbers/letters indicated. ' 11. Valley gutters indicated. Flag flow line elevations at quarter points on curb returns and valley gutter IT OK N/A centerline. r OK /N/A 12. Stationing and offsets of all drainage structures shown. 13. TC/RIM elevations at all drain structures w/invert and r OK it N/A FL elevations shown. (Invert and FL elevations may be shown on profile if preferred. If profile is not on same sheet as plan view,TC/RIM,invert,and FL elevations ' must be shown on plan'and profile.) / r OK r�,/ N/A 14. Drainage easements shown and dimensioned. 15. Location of underground pipes and utilities shown for laterals and main lines(i.e.sanitary sewer,gas, r^! OK r N/A water,etc.). 16. Street monuments shown. I-- OK rN/A 17. Off-tract slope easement shown,with x-sections, r OK N/A topo and offer of dedication for slope easement submitted for review. 18. Pedestrian Paths shown. Basic grade shown. r+/ OK r /A 19. Wheelchair ramps shown at returns with details. IT OK N/A C. PROFILES 1. Vertical curves designed for proper speeds per r OK rc/N/A Highway Design Manual. 2. Minimum vertical curve lengths observed. r OK r�A • 3. Curb returns and cul-de-sac profiles shown(high r OK r N/A and or low points indicated when vertical curve is used. Page 3 of 6 COMPLY NOT APPLY CITY COMMENTS 4. Vertical curve used for grade breaks greater•than 2%. (3%on sag curves). • fi OK [ N/A 5.. 6%maximum gradient observed @ intersecting streets.— OK EIN/A 6. 6%maximum grade observed across intersections. EOK EV)/A - 7. 1%minimum grade observed on all streets. fi OK j` N/A _ - 8. Maximum street grades per ordinance. [ OK [ N/A 9. Underground pipes and utilities shown. 1-1K f /A 10. Existing ground at centerline shown. Where r OK N/A topography.is steep,existing ground left and right of - centerline has been shown. 11. Finish grade profile for centerline and for top of curb E OK r/N/A shown(left&right)if special grades required. 12. Cul-de-sacs all have 1%to 4%cross slope between F. OK f� N/A gutter lip and high point. 13. Super elevation grades shown where required by OK N/A Highway Design Manual. — 14. Back of curb flow diverters indicated on proposed county streets with grades over 5%when no sidewalk f OK f N/A installed. 15. Centerline profiles of intersecting streets shown to their point of intersection. (Showing curb return or f, OK _VN/A other profiles in lieu of the centerline profile is not an adequate or correct representation.) 16. Off-tract profile to catch point shown where road is i OK JN/A constructed to subdivision boundary. 17. Centerline stations and elevations shown @ 50' OK VN/A minimum intervals and @ all BVC,EVC,PIVC,and r grade breaks. 18. Profile slopes indicated. r OK N/A III. DRAINAGE A. HYDROLOGY-HYDRAULICS 1. Contours shown for 100 feet+beyond property. r- OK IIN/A 2. 100 year water surface calculations completed when natural watercourse or drainage facility flows through f• OK r�N/A or adjacent to subdivision or the property lies within flood hazards or flood prone area and water surface shown on plans. 3. EGL,HGL,Fl,El,Q,A,S,V,freeboard at structures, OK N/A structure losses,tailwater assumptions,super or • subcritical flow all indicated. , 4. Adequacy of in-tract drainage system verified. /OK I N/A 5. All starting water surface calculations adequately I verified. (When computing beginning water surface in r OK N/A natural watercourse and no obvious point of control is available,begin 500'downstream and work up to point , in question.) Page4of6 of 6 ' COMPLY NOJ'APPLY CITY COMMENTS 6. Adequacy of off-tract drainage system verified. (— OK F N/A B. EASEMENTS F OK 1; N:A 1. Easements shown on map are shown on plans. . 2. Off-tract drainage improvements(plan and profile) F OK F' N/A and accompanying easements shown. Off-tract offers of dedication for drainage easement submitted for review. 3. Off-tract work to be done but no easement r OK /A requirements. Right of entry submitted for review. 4. Easement widths indicated for(a)closed conduits, r- OK (- /A (b)open channels. 5. Sufficient X-sections submitted to verify easement width and Development rights for open channels. F OK N/A 6. Access and ingress easements shown,graded to be F. OK 14/A useable. 7. Minimum 12'ingress easement to public way provided to all access easements. .. - OK I, N/A 8. Minimum 40'centerline radius for access easements OK N/A shown. 9. Structure setback line indicated and location verified FOK FIN/A with X-sections for unimproved channel. 10. Fences shown as required where street crosses F OK - F✓ N/A watercourse or drainage structure. 11. Fences shown as required at outside boundaries of A open lined channel easements and water district canals OK I N/ C. STRUCTURES 1. Inlet detail shown for new inlet installation. OK ri N/A 2. Inlet depths without manhole bases and max.dia. F OK J N/A Pipes through inlets observed. Type A 6' CC 3011 36"front 30"side Type B 12' CC3012 36"front 30"side • Type C 4' CC3013 36"front 24"side Type D 6' CC3016 36"front 24"side . Type E 4' CC3017 36"front 24"side 3. Max.diameter pipes through manholes observed.Type I 24" CC 3020 F OK IN/A Type II 42" CC 3021 Type III 60" CC 3022 4. 1.25"minimum freeboard in inlets and manholes. F OK [" l/A 5. HGL shown in all structure profiles. — OK rJ /A 6. Structure type indicated on plan or on structure list j— OK rci N/A on same plan sheet. Page 5 of 6 , 1 - COMPLY NOT APPLY CITY COMMENTS D. PIPES 1. Closed conduit minimum slope of 0.005 observed. r. OK /A 2. Natural watercourses are placed in closed OK iN/A • conduits for flows less than 80 cfs. 3. Storm drain calculations submitted and correspond r OK iN/A with plans. 4. Water directed into inlet does not reverse the r OK /NIA direction of flow. 5. Minimum centerline radii of pipe checked. - Beveled RCP lengths specified(bevel one or both r OK 17/N/A ends)and stationing of EC and BC indicated. 6. Outlet protection for closed conduits or lined fl OK r NIA channels provided. 7. 2`minimum cover over pipe observed(provided r; OK 174/A manufacturer specs does not require more)unless special design and calcs. 8. Design Q shown on pipe profile. . . r` OK • r- OK , VN/A9. Minimum cleansing velocity of 2 FPS with half design flow observed. r OK ]i7' N1A 10. 18"minimum pipe size. E. CHANNELS 1. Maximum velocity in earth channel verified by OK /A soils report-minimum velocity 3 FPS. 2. - Improved earth channel side slopes shown to be • 2:1 or less steep as specified by soils report. in OK N/A 3. Lined channel side slopes as specified by soils IT OK r�//A • report. 4. Areas noted to be cleared of structures,trees, OK Vi/ N/A brush,and debris within natural channel and watercourses. J:\FORMS\Templates\Land Development\Street Improvements\Checklist for Street Improvement Plans STATIC form2.pdf Rev.1/12 Page 6 of 6 TO BE RECORDED WITHOUT FEE a SECTION 6103 GOVERNMENT CODE AT THE REQUEST OF CITY OF CAMPBELL, Recording Requested by: ) L �(bV(de, �- L City of Campbell ) • • When recorded mail to: ) ) City Clerk ) • City of Campbell ) • 70 North First Street ) Campbell, CA 95008 ) APN: 279-27-096 (Space above this line for Recorder' use only.) ADDRESS:95 E Hamilton Avenue,Campbell,CA 95008 STREET IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS THIS AGREEMENT, identified by File No(s). ENC2017-289 is entered into this day of , 2018,_ by and between 95 HAMILTON LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; hereunder referred to as "Owner," and the CITY OF CAMPBELL, a municipal corporation of the County of Santa Clara, State of California,hereinafter referred to as "City." • On December 13th, 2016 the Planning Commission granted conditional approval of a New Commercial Building, for that certain real property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated as though fully set forth herein, and commonly known as 95 E. Hamilton Avenue, which property is hereinafter referred to as "said real property." TERMS AND CONDITIONS Now, therefore, in consideration of the above referenced approvals, and in satisfaction thereof, the parties to this Agreement shall comply with the following terms and conditions: (1) The Owner shall provide, construct and install at his/her own proper cost and expense, street improvements as described in Section 11.24.040 of the City Code within 12 months from the date first mentioned hereinabove; provided, however, that in the computation of said 12 month period, delays due to, or caused by acts of God, viz., unusually inclement weather, major strikes, and other delays beyond the control of the Owner or his/her successors shall be excluded. (2) If the Owner fails to complete the work required by this Agreement within the said 12 _ month period, the City, after giving ten (10) days written notice to the Owner, or his/her successors, may construct and/or install said improvements and recover the full cost and -expense from the Owner, or his/her successors. STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS (3) The Owner, shall cause to be prepared at his/her cost and expense street improvement plans for the construction and installation of said improvements prior to such construction or installation. Said plans shall be prepared by a civil engineer registered by the State of California and submitted to the City Engineer for examination and approval. (4) All of said improvements embraced in this Agreement shall be constructed and installed in accordance with the plans approved by the City Engineer and shall be made under the inspection and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Said construction and/or installation shall be in accordance with the existing ordinances and resolutions of the City of Campbell and all applicable plans, specifications, standards, sizes, lines and grades . approved by the City Engineer, and all State and County,statutes. Upon completion and acceptance of the improvements by the City, the Owner, shall provide reproducible as- built plans to the City Engineer. PLAN CHECK AND INSPECTION FEE (5) Prior to approval of the plans by the City Engineer pursuant to Section (3) of this Agreement, Owner, or his/her successors, shall pay the City for plan checking of improvement plans, field inspection of construction of improvements and all necessary expenses incurred by City in,,connection with:,said improvements, a sum calculated in accordance with Resolution No ,10494 as adopted by the City Council on May 3, 2005, or as may subsequently be adopted by the.City Council. FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE SECURITY (6) The Owner, or=ehis/her successors, shall file"with City, prior to beginning construction, security acceptable to the City in amount equal to the City Engineer's estimated cost of the street improvements to ensure full and faithful performance of the construction of all the aforementioned improvement work. Said security shall guarantee that Owner, and his/her successors, will correct ahr defects which may appear in said improvement work within one (1) year from,the date of-acceptance of the work by City and pay for any damage to other work resulting from the construction thereof, as well as pay the cost of all labor and materials involved.'This security shall remain in effect until one (1) year after date of final acceptance of said improvements by City. Said security amount may be - reduced by the City Engineer in his/her sole discretion after the date of final acceptance to not less than twenty-five(25)percent of its full value. (7) Upon final release of said security by City, the obligations of Owner, and his/her _ successors, contained in-this Agreement shall be considered null and void, except as otherwise provided by applicable law, or Sections 12 or 13 of this Agreement. - FORMATION OF A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT (8) The Owner, when called upon by City to do so, shall execute a petition for the formation of any special assessment district created pursuant to any special assessment act as provided in the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California created for the purpose of constructing and/or installing any or all of said improvements. Owner, or his/her successors, shall participate in and become a part of any special assessment district as described in Section (8) of this Agreement. 2 (9) The Owner's, or his/her successors' obligations contained in this Agreement that are accomplished to the satisfaction of said City Engineer by said special assessment district shall be considered to satisfy those obligations. RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITION (10) Owner at his/her. own cost and expense, shall acquire any easement and right-of-way within or without said real property necessary for the completion of the improvements shown upon aforesaid improvement plans. It is provided, however, that in the event eminent domain proceedings are required for the purpose of securing said easement and right-of-way, Owner, shall deposit or cause to be deposited with City a sum covering the reasonable market value of the land proposed to be taken and to be included in said sum shall be a reasonable allowance for severance;damages, if any. It is further provided that in addition thereto such sums as may be required for legal fees and costs, engineering and other incidental costs shall be deposited with the City. (11) The Owner, shall carry out any and all negotiations with all interested parties and shall perform or cause to be performed,at his/her own cost and expense and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer any and-all,work required to abandon, remove, raise, lower,relocate and otherwise modify irrigation lines within,or without the boundary of said real property. INDEMNITY AND INSURANCE (12) The Owner, and his/her successors, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall indemnify, defend'and hold• the City\‘of=Campbell, its agents, employees, attorneys, officers, officials and assignees harmless from any and all claims, actions, causes of action,liabilities, damages,'losses?:and expenses, including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees, arising out of, or resulting from, or, alleged to arise out of or result from any negligent or intentional act or omission (including misconduct) of said Owner, or his/her successors, or any subcontractor,•or anyone directly or indirectly employed by him, or anyone for whose acts,;any of them may be liable in the course of performance of the Agreement, except for any claims, actions, causes of action, liabilities, damages, losses and expenses proximately caused by the sole negligence or.willful misconduct of the City. (13) The Owner, and his/her successors, shall also indemnify, defend and hold the City of Campbell, its agents, attorneys, employees, officers, officials, and assignees harmless against and from any and all claims, actions, causes of action, liabilities, demands, losses, lawsuits, judgments, damages, costs and expenses (including, but not limited to, attorneys' fees and court costs, whether incurred at trial, appellate or administrative levels) which the City of Campbell may incur or suffer, or to which the City of Campbell may be subjected resulting from, or alleged to result from the failure of Owner, or his/her heirs, assignees, successors, grantees, agents, employees, subcontractors, or anyone performing services under him, to fulfill any of the obligations imposed under this Agreement, except for any claims, actions, causes of action, liabilities, judgments, 3 ' . damages, costs and expenses proximately caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City. (14) The Owner and his/her successors shall also indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers or employees to attach, set aside, void or annul an approval of the City, its City Council, Planning Commission, Community Development Director, Public Works Director, Building Official, City Engineer, or other. such City official concerning a subdivision, which action is brought within the time period provided for in California Government Code Section 66499.37. (15) In the event that this contract is subject to California Civil Code section 2782(b), the foregoing indemnity provisions shall not apply to any liability for the active negligence of the City. The foregoing indemnity provisions are intended to fully allocate all risk of liability to third-parties. No other rights of indemnity or contribution shall exist between the parties in law or in equity. The provisions set forth in this section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. • (16) The City will promptly notify the Owner of any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval concerning a"subdivision of said real property, and will cooperate fully in the defense. (17) Owner and his/her/its successors shall maintain insurance for injuries to persons or damage to property conforming to the following specifications: A. Minimum Scope of Insurance Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1. Insurance Services Office (ISO) CGL form CG 00 01 11 85; and 2. ISO form G0009 11 88 Owners and Contractors Protective Liability Coverage Form—Coverage for Operations of Designated Contractor; and: 3. Course of Construction Insurance covering all risks of loss; and 4. ISO CA 00 01 06 92 including symbol 1 (Any Auto); and 5. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employer's Liability insurance. B. Minimum Limits of Insurance Owner shall maintain limits no less than: 1. General Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence for bodily, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, 4 either the general . aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location,.or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. - 2. Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation limits as required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employer's Liability limits of$1,000,000 per accident. It is a requirement of this Agreement that any available insurance proceeds broader than or in excess of the specified minimum insurance coverage requirements and/or limits set forth in this Agreement shall be available to the City as an additional insured. Furthermore, the requirements for coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage limits specified in this Agreement, or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of coverage of any insurance policy or proceeds available to the named insured, whichever affords greater coverage. The limits of insurance required in this Agreement may be satisfied by a combination of primary and umbrella or excess insurance. Any umbrella or excess insurance shall contain or be endorsed'to contain a provision that such coverage shall also apply on a primary and non-contributory basis for the benefit of City(as agreed to in this Agreement) before the City's own insurance or self-insurance shall be called upon to protect it as a named insured. C. Deductible and Self-Insured Retention Any deductibles or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retention as respects the City, its agents, officers, attorneys, employees, officials and volunteers; or the Owner shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses related to investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses. D. Other Insurance Provisions The policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain,the following provisions: 1. General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverage: a. The City, its agents, officers, attorneys, employees, officials and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities related to this Agreement performed by or on behalf of the Owner, products and completed operations of the Owner, premises owned, occupied or used by the Owner,' or automobiles owned, leased,hired or borrowed by the Owner. b. The Owner's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its agents, officers, attorneys, employees, officials and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance 5 maintained by the City, its agents, officers, attorneys, employees, officials and volunteers shall be excess of the Owner's insurance and shall not contribute with it. c. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions. of the policies shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its agents, officers, attorneys, employees, officials, and volunteers. d. The Owner's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. e. Coverage shall not extend to any indemnity coverage for the active negligence of the City in any, case where an agreement to indemnify the City would be invalid under Subdivision (b) of Section 2782 of the California Civil Code. 2. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability Coverage: The insurer shall agree to waive all rights of subrogation against the City, its agents, officers, attorneys, employees, officials, and volunteers for losses arising from work performed by the Owner for the City. 3. Course of Construction Coverage Course of Construction policies shall contain the following provisions: (a) the City shall be named as loss payee; and (b) the insurer shall waive all rights of subrogation against the City 4. :_,All Coverages: Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be 'endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. • E. Acceptability of Insurers Without limiting'Owner's'indemnification provided hereunder, Owner shall take out and maintain at all times during the life of this contract, up to the date of acceptance of the work by the City, the policies of insurance listed in Paragraphs 12 through 16 of this Agreement. Insurance is to be issued by an issuer with a current A.M.' Best Rating of A:VII and be authorized to transact business in the State of California,unless otherwise approved by the City. F. Verification of Coverage Owner shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance evidencing coverage - required by this clause. The certificates for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The certificates are to be on forms provided by the City. Where by statue, the City Workers' Compensation related forms cannot be used, equivalent forms approved by the Insurance Commissioner are to be substituted. All certificates are to be 6 • received and approved by the City before work commences. G. Subcontractors Owner shall include all subcontractors as insured under its policies or shall furnish separate certificates by each subcontractor. All-coverage_shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein. MUTUAL BENEFIT COVENANTS BINDING ON HEIRS, ASSIGNEES, SUCCESSORS, AND GRANTEES OF OWNER (18) It is acknowledged that the provisions of this Agreement constitute covenants for the improvement of the subject real property for the mutual benefit of Owner's property, commonly known as 95 E. Hamilton Avenue, and the City's property, commonly described as E. Hamilton Avenue where it adjoins Owner's property. These covenants shall be considered to affect rights in the'above-described real properties, and shall be binding on the heirs, assignees, successors,grantees and agents of the Owner to said real property. UNVESTED INTERESTS (19) Nothing contained herein shall be construed to transfer any unvested interests in real or personal property for purposes of the rule against BREACH OF CONTRACT (20) The City,upon breach any of the terms, conditions, or covenants of this Agreement by the Owners, shall be entitled to recover from-the Owner, in addition to any other relief available in law or equity, all costs and compensation incurred in attempting to obtain enforcement of the Agreement,including reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs. ENTIRE AGREEMENT BINDING (21) This is the entire Agreement between the parties, and there are no representations, agreements, arrangements or understandings that are not fully expressed herein. This Agreement can be executed in counterparts b the parties hereto, and as so executed shall consist of one agreement,binding on all parties. PRELIMINARY PLANS (22) Owner shall provide and construct public street improvements per preliminary plans titled "STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS - OFFSITE — 95 E. HAMILTON AVENUE," which are subject to approval by the City Engineer, prepared by MFA ENGINEERS AND ASSOCIATES. 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said City has caused its name to be affixed by its Public Works Director and City Clerk, who are duly authorized by Ordinance 2059 adopted September 20, 2005, and said Owner has caused his/her name to be affixed the day and year first above written. 95 HAMILTON LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY Owner Name,Title Owner Name,Title • CITY OF CAMPBELL • Todd Capurso, Public Works Director City of Campbell (Notary Acknowledgment for above signator(ies) MUST be attached.) • Attest: - Wendy Wood, City Clerk 8 MFA ENGINEERS & ASSOCIATES RECEIVED CONSULTANTS FOR: E ENGINEERING„RTHQUAKE ENR ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEEERING, RING SICS,SOIL AND ROCK CHAIVICS DEC 2017 3001 S.Winchester Blvd,Suite B,Campbell,CA 95008 public Works Administration Tel:(408)509-3461 January 05, 2017 File No. 01-15-100 Mr.James S. Mcclenanhan 1190 Park Avenue San Jose, California 95126 RE: GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY PROPOSED (N) 2-STORY COMMERCIAL BLDG 95 E. HAMILTON AVENUE, CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008 Dear James In accordance with your request, we have performed a geotechnical engineering study for the captioned project. The accompanying report presents the results of our field investigation, laboratory testing and engineering analysis. The subsurface conditions at the site are discussed and recommendations for the geotechnical engineering aspects of the proposed development are presented. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are contingent upon MFA Engineers &Associates being retained to review the final plans and specifications and to observe the site grading and foundation phases of the work. We refer you to the text of the report for detailed recommendations. If you have any questions concerning our findings, please call. Very truly yours, MFA Engineers &Associates Q�0ESSION ��O P\> NB IAN/44F�c ce Lc, Ali Abiani ; C 57818 m Project Principal tS> v‘V Copies submitted: Address Table of Content Page No. COVER LETTER INTRODUCTION 3 SCOPE 3 FINDINGS 3 A.SURFACE CONDITIONS 3 B. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 C. GROUNDWATER 4 D. SEISMICITY AND SEISMIC INDUCED HAZARDS 4 E. SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA 4 • CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5 A. GRADING AND EARTHWORK 5 1. General 5 2. Clearing and site preparation 5 3. Subsurface Preparation 6 4.Material for Fill 6 5. Compaction 6 6. Trench Backfill 6 7. Drainage 7 B.FOUNDATIONS 7 1. Footings 7 • 2. Lateral Loads 8 3.Retaining Wall 8 4. Slab Construction 9 INVESTIGATION LIMITATIONS 11 FIGURES FIGURE 1 -VICINITY MAP FIGURE 2-SiTE PLAN APPENDICES APPENDIX -FIELD INVESTIGATION&LABORATORY TESTING KEY TO EXPLORATORY LOGS IN TWO PAGES LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS , EB-1&EB-2,IN FOUR PAGES Luca-2.rep MFA Engineers&Associates Page 2 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our geotechnical engineering study for the proposed project. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the existing surface and subsurface conditions and to provide design recommendations and construction considerations concerning the geotechnical engineering aspects of the project. SCOPE The scope of work performed in this investigation included a site reconnaissance, subsurface exploration, laboratory testing, engineering analysis of the field and laboratory data, and the preparation of this report. The data obtained and the analyses performed were for the purpose of providing design and construction criteria for subject project. FINDINGS A site reconnaissance and a subsurface investigation program were conducted on May 08, 2014. A truck mounted drilling equipment using 4-inch diameter continuous flight augers was used to investigate and sample the subsurface materials. A total of two(2) exploratory borings were made to maximum depths of 23.5 feet below existing ground surface. The approximate location of exploratory borings is shown on Site Plan. Logs of borings and details regarding the field investigation are included in appendix. A. SURFACE CONDITIONS The site of the proposed development is located at the north side of Hamilton Avenue in City of Campbell and relatively flat. B. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The location of borings drilled for this investigation is shown on Site Plan.The subsurface description is shown on boring logs. It should be noted that the soil conditions at other locations may differ from conditions explored at boring location. Luca-21.rep MFA Engineers&Associates Page 3 The location of borings drilled for this investigation is shown on Site Plan.The subsurface description is shown on boring logs. It should be noted that the soil conditions at other locations may differ from conditions explored at boring location. C. GROUNDWATER Free groundwater was not encountered in the exploratory borings. However,fluctuation of both localized perched groundwater and the regional groundwater levels at the site may occur due to variations in rainfall,temperature,irrigation, and other factors not evident at the time of our field investigation. D. SEISMICITY AND SEISMIC INDUCED HAZARDS The San Andreas Fault System is a major seismic feature in California. It extends from the Gulf of Mexico to the north of Point Arena. Earthquakes are common in California and there have been several major earthquakes of magnitude 7.0 and much greater since 1836. Several of these earthquakes occurred on the San Andreas Fault which resulted in major structural damage in the area. Similar to the most of San Francisco Bay Area,the proposed site is in a region of high risk of seismic activity. It is anticipated that the planned structure will be subjected to moderate to severe ground shaking caused by a major earthquake during the life of the proposed development. E. SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA(CBC 2013 ) The 2013 California Building Code (CBC 2013 )Earthquake loads,requires that structures to be designed for lateral forces using certain earthquake design parameters, The parameters are based on the seismic zone, soil profile, and proximity of the site to active seismic faults. A summary of the seismic design parameters for use in calculating lateral forces based on the USGS ground motion calculator are as follows: Latitude: 37.294609,Longitude: -1219480871 2013 CBC Parameter Table/Figure/Equation Factor/Coefficient/Type Value Short Period MCE at 0.2 Seconds Figure 1613.5(3) Ss 1.549g 1.0 Second Period MCE Figure 1613.5(4) S1 0.600g Site Class Table 1613.5.2 D Site Coefficient Table 1613.5.3(1) Fa 1.0 Site Coefficient Table 1613.5.3(2) Fv 1.5 Adjusted MCE Spectral Response Equation 16-37 SMS 1.549g Parameters Equation 16.38 SM1 0.900g Design Spectral Acceleration Equation 16-39 SDS 1.033g Parameters Equation 16-40 SD 1 0.600g Luca-2.rep MFA Engineers&Associates Page 4 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS From a geotechnical engineering standpoint,it is our professional opinion that the site is suitable for proposed project provided that recommendations presented in this report are properly incorporated in the design and construction of the project under the supervision of MFA Engineers& Associates to ensure proper construction. The opinions, conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are contingent upon MFA being retained to review the final plans and specifications and to observe the grading, drainage, and foundation phases of the work. The analyses and recommendations submitted in this report are based upon our site reconnaissance,together with the information obtained from the two(2) exploratory boring to a maximum depth of 23.5 feet performed at the approximate locations shown on Figure 1. This report does not reflect any variations which may occur between the borings. The nature and extend of variations in subsurface conditions between the borings may not become evident until sometime during the course of construction. If variation then appear, it will be necessary to reevaluate the recommendations presented in this report after making on-site observations during construction and noting the characteristics of such variations. We assume no responsibility for construction compliance with the design, specifications and MFA recommendations unless we have been retained to perform review of construction plans, observations and testing as deemed necessary during the course of construction. A. GRADING AND EARTHWORK 1. General All grading and earthwork should be performed under the observation of our representative to assure proper site preparation, selection of satisfactory fill materials, as well as placement and compaction of the fill. At least two working days notification prior to earthwork operations is required to make • certain that the work will be properly observed. All earth-work should be performed in accordance with the recommendations and construction considerations presented in this report. 2. CLEARING AND SITE PREPARATION Prior to earthwork operations, all areas to receive building improvements should be cleared of all deleterious materials and obstructions, including tree roots, existing structures and associated foundations, concrete slabs,buried utilities, and other debris. Holes resulting from the removal of any underground obstructions that extend below the proposed finished sub-grade level should be cleared and backfilled with suitable material compacted to the requirements given in this report under"Compaction". To assure that the excavations are properly backfilled,we recommend the backfilling operations be carried out under the observation of our representative. After clearing,the site should be stripped to sufficient depths to remove all surface vegetation and Luca-21.rep MM Engineers&Associates Page 5 organic laden topsoil. At the time of our field investigation,we estimated the stripping depths of 2- 4 inches would be required. The actual required stripping depth will depend on the site usage prior to construction. Any pockets of loose, soft, or deleterious materials exposed during grading should also be removed. The stripped materials should be removed from the site or stockpiled for use in landscape areas, if desired. 3. SUBGRADE PREPARATION After the site has been properly cleared, stripped,the exposed sub-grade soils in all areas to receive structural fill, and building improvements should be scarified to a depth of 6 inches, moisture conditioned with water to at least two percent above the laboratory established optimum moisture content and compacted to the requirements for structural fills as given per"Compaction." Criteria of this report. Depending on the time of the year that the grading is performed, it may be necessary to mix substantial quantities of water with on-site soils, or aerate the soils to achieve the required moisture content. 4.Material for Fill All native soils having an organic content of 2 percent or less by volume are suitable for use as fill. Fill material should not,however, contain rocks or lumps over 4 inches in greatest dimension and not more than 15 percent larger than 2.5 inches. In addition to the preceding requirements, any imported fill should be predominately granular with a plasticity index of 15 to provide sufficient cohesion. 5. Compaction All structural fill should be compacted to a minimum degree of compaction of 95 percent as determined by the latest version of ASTM Test Designation D 1557.Fill materials should be spread and compacted in lifts not exceeding 8 inches in un-compacted thickness. 6. Trench Backfill Underground utility trenches should be backfilled with compacted structural fill. If on-site soils are used, materials should be placed in lifts not exceeding 8 inches in un-compacted thickness and compacted to a minimum degree.of compaction of 90 percent by mechanical means only. Imported sand may be used for backfilling trenches provided it is compacted to at least 90 percent.Water jetting should not be permitted.In all building and improved areas,the upper 3 feet of trench backfill should be compacted to 95 percent for native material and import sand. Luca-2.rep MFA Engineers&Associates Page 6 may be used for backfilling trenches provided it is compacted to at least 90 percent. Water jetting should not be permitted. In all building and improved areas, the upper 3 feet of trench backfill should be compacted to 95 percent for native material and import sand. 7. DRAINAGE Positive and effective surface drainage at the proposed site is an essential part of the overall design, construction, and maintenance of the proposed foundation due to flatness of the site and the potentially expansive nature of the on -site soils. No ponding of water should be permitted adjacent to the structure. The site grading should slope away from footings with at a minimum slope of 5% (2.5 inches of fall in 4 feet) for at least 10 feet from the footing to prevent ponding of water against the footings. If physical obstructions or lot lines prohibit 10 feet of horizontal distance, a 5% slope (2.5 inches of fall in 4 feet) shall be provided to an approved alternative method diverting water away from the building foundation. Swales used for this purpose shall be sloped at minimum with a longitudinal slope of 2% (1 inches of fall in 4 feet) where located within 10 feet of building foundation. Also, impervious surfaces (paved) within 10 feet of building foundation shall be sloped a minimum of 2% (1 inches of fall in 4 feet) away from the building foundation. Surface water should be directed away from the foundations into drainage swales, or into a surface drainage system (catch basins and solid drain lines). Trapped planting areas should not be created next to any buildings without providing means for drainage (area drains). The downspouts may be connected to solid drain lines, or may be connected to the same drain line as any catch basins, but must not connect to any perforated pipe drainage system. If splash blocks are preferred, then a perimeter footing drain system must be installed. Hose outlets and watering systems should be arranged for in such a way as to prevent excessive moisture from reaching foundations. C. FOUNDATIONS 1. FOOTINGS We recommend that the proposed structures be supported on conventional individual and/or continuous spread footings bearing on undisturbed native soil and/or properly compacted structural fill. All new footings should be founded at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent finished grade. The footings may be designed for allowable bearing pressures of 2000 pounds per square foot for dead loads plus live loads, and 2500 pounds per square foot for all loads including wind or seismic. All footings should have a minimum width of 18 inches. Page In order to maintain adequate support for footings, the bottoms of utility trenches located adjacent to or within the building should not extend below an imaginary plane having an inclination of 1.5 horizontal to 1.0 vertical downward from the bottom edge of the footings. Footing tops are to be level, whereas the bottom of footings may have a slope of up to 10% (5 inches of fall in 4 feet.) Also footings must be stepped when necessary to keep the footings in the ground when site slopes exceed 10% (5 inches of fall in 4 feet.) Isolated footings on granular soils must be located so that a line drawn between the lower edges of adjoining footings does not exceed a 30 degrees angle with the horizontal. All continuous footings should be reinforced with top and bottom reinforcement to provide structural continuity and to permit spanning of local irregularities. Existing foundations should be securely connected to new foundations to safely carry the anticipated structural loads without causing settlements. Structural and geotechnical evaluation of existing buildings and retaining walls are not included in the scope of this investigation To assure that footings are founded in materials of adequate bearing capacity, it is essential that our representative observe the footing excavations prior to placing reinforcing steel and concrete. Settlements under anticipated building loads are expected to be within tolerable limits for the proposed project. We estimate that the total settlement of the proposed foundation would be less than 3/4 inch. Post construction differential settlements across the building should not exceed 1/z inch over the 30-year period following construction. Slight settlements should be considered in the design of foundations and proposed structures 2. LATERAL LOADS Lateral loads may be resisted by friction between the footing bottoms and the supporting sub-grade. A design friction coefficient of 0.25 is considered applicable. As an alternative, lateral loads may be resisted by designing the footings for an equivalent fluid weight of 220 pounds per cubic foot, if the footings are poured neat against undisturbed soil. 3. RETAINING WALLS Retaining walls with level surface or with sloping surface equal to or flatter than 3:1 should be designed to resist an equivalent fluid active pressure of fifty five pounds per cubic foot ( Ka=1/2 and average density=110 PCF). Walls that are restricted from movement at top should be designed for K0=2/3 and Average density=110 PCF. Retaining walls should be designed for two cases, first case, being free at top and second case , being restrained at top. Pc i 8 . I • only hand operated equipment: whackers,. vibratory plates, should be used in this zone. If heavy • compaction equipment is used,the walls should be appropriately designed for the heavy equipment and/or temporarily braced. Additionally, the walls should be designed to resist additional lateral loads caused by surcharge loads (such vehicular load). These additional loads, equal to one-third the anticipated surcharge for unrestrained walls, or one-half the surcharge for restrained wall, should be used in design. Lateral earth pressures induced by earthquake should also be considered in design. We recommend that the earthquake induced lateral loads be taken as that imposed by an equivalent fluid weight of 20 pounds per cubic foot; however,the distribution of this load should be taken as an "inverted triangle,"with resultant force acting at a point two-thirds of the wall height above the base of the wall. The preceding pressures assume sufficient drainage behind the walls to prevent the build-up of the hydrostatic pressures from surface water infiltration and/or a rise in ground water table. Positive drainage should be provided behind all retaining walls greater than 18 inches high. The drain should consist of a minimum 12 inches wide blanket of Caltrans class 2 permeable material or approved equal wrapped in filter fabric,Mirafi 140 N or approved equal. A minimum 4 inches in diameter perforated pipe shall be placed near the bottom of the drain rock and continuously and evenly sloped a minimum of 2% (1 inch of fall in 4 feet), the pipe should be provided with cleanouts at the high end and at bends in excess of 45 degrees, the top 18. inches of backfill behind the retaining walls should be a low permeability material compacted in accordance with "compaction" criteria in this report The soil cap should be separated from underlying drain rock with a double layer of filter fabric.We recommend that water collected through the sub-drain system be directed into proper discharge facilities. Collected water may not be discharged on the existing slopes.. Settlements under anticipated building loads are expected to be within tolerable limits for the • proposed project. We estimate that the total settlement of the proposed foundation could be less than 1- inch. Post construction differential settlements across the building should not exceed % inches over 30- year period following construction. 4.Slab Construction Slab thickness and reinforcing should be provided in accordance with the anticipated use and loading of the slab by project structural engineer. The sidewalks walks may consist of conventional slab-on-grade. It should be expected that some seasonal or post construction shifting of such slabs may occur. We have provided guidelines to help reduce post-construction movements, however, it is nearly impossible to economically eliminate all shifting. To help reduce cracking, we recommend slabs be a minimum of 4 inches thick and to be nominally reinforced with#4 reinforcing bars at 18 inches on center, each way. Slabs which are thinner or more lightly reinforced may experience undesirable cracking, however, actual reinforcement and thickness should be determined by the structural engineer based on anticipated usage and loading. Luca-21.rep ' MFA Engineers&Associates Page 9 . Y • In large non-interior slabs, score joints should be placed at a minimum of 10 feet on center. In sidewalks, score joints should be placed at a maximum of 5 feet on center. All slabs should be separated from adjacent improvements (footings, columns, etc.) with expansion joints. Interior floor slabs will experience shrinkage cracking. These cosmetic cracks may be sealed with epoxy or other measures specified by your architect. • Slabs which will be subject to Vehicular loads and through which moisture transmission is not a concern(driveways) should be underlain by at least 6 inches of compacted base-rock, in lieu of the sand and gravel. Exterior landscaping flatwork (sidewalks) may be placed directly on proof-rolled soil sub- grade materials (no granular sub-grade);however, they will be potentially subject to shifting and moisture transmission. As stated previously, in pavement (concrete, asphalt) areas to.receive Vehicular traffic, all base- rock materials should be at least compacted to 95 percent relative compaction. Also the upper 6 inches of native soil sub-grade beneath any pavements should be compacted to at least 90 percent relative • compaction. Preparation of the natural sub-grade soils and placement of the imported structural fill should be performed in accordance with our recommendations in this report"Grading and Earthwork" Concrete slabs around the landscaping area should be protected from water seepage. The water seepage from these areas usually creates over-saturation of the base rock and the sub-grade, thereby causing unstable conditions. Henceforth, we recommend the following: Provide vertical cut-off or a deep vertical curb section all along the landscaping areas. The vertical cut-off should extend through the base rock and a minimum of six inches into the sub-grade. This will limit the water seepage into the adjacent concrete slabs. Minor cracking of the concrete slabs on grade should be anticipated due to long-term differential movement of any underlying fill or natural soil. The.project Structural Engineer should determine the exact thickness and reinforcements based on the design live load and dead load. Luca-2.rep FIFA Engineers&Associates. Page 10 INVESTIGATION LIMITATIONS Our services consist of professional opinions and recommendations made in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices. This warranty is in lieu of all other warranties, either express or implied. We are responsible for the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report based on the data relating only to the specific project and location discussed herein. In the event conclusions and recommendations based on these data are made by others, such conclusions and recommendations are not our responsibility unless we have been given an opportunity to review or concur in such conclusions and recommendations in writing. This report has been prepared in order to aid in the evaluation of this property and to assist the. designers in the design of this project. In the event of any changes in general design or location of the structure or anticipated grading concept, our conclusions and recommendations shall not be considered valid unless the changes are reviewed and conclusions of this report modified or verified in writing by MFA Engineers&Associates. • • • • • • Luca-21.rep MFA Engineers&Associates Page 11 • • APPENDIX -NYELD INVESTIGATION&LABORATORY TESTING A site reconnaissance and a subsurface investigation program were conducted on July 8, 2014. A truck mounted drilling equipment using 4-inch diameter continuous flight augers was used to investigate and sample the subsurface materials. A total of two(2) exploratory borings were made to maximum depths of 15 feet below existing ground surface. Groundwater was not encountered in the borings. The exploratory borings were backfilled upon completion of the exploratory work. The approximate location of the exploratory borings is shown on Site PLan. The soils encountered in the borings were continuously logged in the field by our representative and described in accordance with Unified Soil Classification System(ASTM-D2487). The Logs of borings and details regarding the field investigation as well as a key for the Classification of the soil is included as part of this appendix. Representative soil samples were obtained from the exploratory borings at selected depths appropriate to this investigation. All samples were taken to laboratory for evaluation and testing. The penetration resistance blow counts were obtained by dropping a 140-pound automatic Hammer through 30-inch of fall. The 2-inch I.D.Modified California Sampler was driven 18-inches and the number of blows was recorded for each 6-inch penetration. The blows per foot recorded on the boring logs represent the accumulated number of blows required to drive the second and third 6-inch penetration intervals. The boring logs show our interpretation of the subsurface conditions on the date and at the location indicated, and is not warranted that they are representative of subsurface conditions at other location and other times. • 01-15-100.rep MFA Engineers&Associates s GW Well Graded Gravels,Gravel-Sand Mixtures, • COARSE GRAVELS CLEAN GRAVEL little or Fines Less than 5%fines GP Poorly Graded Gravels or Gravel- GRAINED Sand Mixtures,little or No Fines (More than 50 SOILS %material GRAVEL GM Silty Gravels,Gravel-Sand-Silt Mixtures,Non- larger than#4 With Fines(More Plastic Fines. More than half sieve) than 12%fines) material is GC Clayey Gravels,Gravel-Sand-Clay larger than# Mixtures,Plastic Fines. 200 sieve SANDS CLEAN SAND SW Well Graded Sands,Gravelly Sands,Little or (Less than No Fines. 5%fines) SP Poorly Graded Sands or Gravelly Sands,Little (More than 50 or No Fines. material smaller than#4 SAND SM Salty Sands,Sand-Silt Mixtures,Non-Plastic sieve) With Fines(More than Fines. 12%fines) SC Clayey Sands,Sand-Clay Mixtures,Plastic Fines. ML Inorganic Silts,Sandy or Clayey Silts, FINE SILTS&CLAYS Low to no Plasticity. Liquid Limit is less than 50% CL Inorganic Clay,Sandy or Silty Clay,Low to GRAINED Medium Plasticity. SOILS OL Organic Silt or Organic Silty Clay,Low to Medium Plasticity. More than half MH Inorganic Silts,Diatomaceous or Micaceous, material is SILTS&CLAYS Fine Sandy or Silty Soils. smaller than the #200 sieve Liquid limit is greater than 50% CH Inorganic Clays of High Plasticity,Fat Clays. OH Organic Clays of Medium to High Plasticity, Organic Silts. HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS PT Peat and Other Highly Organic Soils. PARTICLE SIZE LIMITS (Sieve Openings in mm.) .074 .425 2.00 4.17 19.0 75.0 300.0 SAND GRAVEL COBBLES I BOULDERS SILT OR CLAY FINE I MEDIUM I COARSE FINE I COARSE (U.S.Standard sieve Sizes) #200 #40 # 10 #4 .75 in 3 in 12 in I RELATIVE DENSITY CONSISTENCY NDS,GRAVELS AND NON- BLOWS/ PLASTIC SILTS FOOT* VERY LOOSE 0 - 4 CLAYS AND BLOWS/ LOOSE 4 - 10 PLASTIC SILTS STRENGTH+ FOOT* MEDIUM DENSE ' 10 - 30 DENSE 30 - 50 VERY DENSE OVER 50 VERY SOFT 0 -1/4 0-2 SOFT 1/4-1/2 2-4 FIRM 1/2-1 4-8 STIFF 1 -2 8—16 VERY STIFF 2-4 16— 32 HARD OVER 4 OVER 32 *Numbers of blows of 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches to drive a 2-inch O.D.(1—3/8 inch I.D.)split spoon(ASTM D-1586). +Unconfined compressive strength in tons/sq.ft.as determined by laboratory testing or approximated by the Standard Penetration test(ASTM D—1586),pocket penetrometer,torvane or visual observation. FIGURE NO.3 KEY TO EXPLORATORY BORING LOGS UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM(ASTM D-2487) • • Dated Drilled: 07-08-2014 EB-1 Figure 3 • 95 E.Hamilton Avenue, Campbell,CA 95008 Boring Diameter:4" Logged by: AA SOIL DESCRIPTION ° lu ° o i; w o 0 cacn w 0v AF" 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Medium Brown Sandy SILT 2.5 • (1.5'-3.0') ion 3.s 1-1 17 ML 12.7 109.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 Tan Brown Sandy SILT AM 6.5 1-2 28 ML 12.5 106.8 (5'-6.5') 7.0 Unit Cohesion 0 KSF 7.5 • Angle of internal friction, degrees=20 8.0 • 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0 10.5 11.0 Tan Brown Sandy SILT 11.5 1-3 29 ML 10.2 110.9 (10'-11.5') 12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 01-15-100.rep MFA Engineers&Associates • • • Dated Drilled: 07-08-2014 EB—1, Continued Figure 3 • 95 E.Hamilton Avenue, Campbell, CA 95008 Boring Diameter:4" Logged by: AA SOIL DESCRIPTION ,° m o as *• • ' s. • F+ o e A y a P cia p -c V .Pa 15.5 16.0 sae 16.5 • Medium Brown Sandy SILT 17.0 1-4 34 ML 11.0 122.7 (15'-16.5') . 17.5 18.0 18.5 19.0 19.5 20.0 20.5 21.0 an 21.5 • Brown Sandy SILT 22M 1-5 66 ML 10.8 114.1 (20.0'-21.5') 22.5 W/Rocks 23.0 No sample,Hard drilling Emu23.5 30 __—�_�__�—_-----_---- -�- 24.0 • Boring was terminated at 24 feet below 24.5 ground surface 25.0 25.5 26.0 26.5 27.0 27.5 28.0 28.5 29.0 • -29.5 30.0 01-15-100.rep MFA Engineers&Associates rte. • • Dated Drilled: 07-08-2014 EB-2 Figure 4 95 E.Hamilton Avenue, • Campbell, CA 95008 Boring Diameter:4" Logged by: AA SOIL DESCRIPTION °tip d o v; °' 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 Medium Brown Sandy SILT. gm 3.0 1-1 25 ML 12.5 103.6 (1.5'-3.0') 3.5 4.0 4.5 • 5.0 5.5 6.0 NE 6.5 Brown Sandy SILT 0 1-2 29 ML 13.2 98.6 7. (5'-6.5') 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0 10.5 11.0 Brown Sandy SILT NM 11.5 1-3 30 ML 10.0 112.5 (10'-11.5') 12.0 12.5 13.0 13.5 14.0 14.5 15.0 01-15-100.rep MFA Engineers&Associates • Dated Drilled: 07-08-2014 EB—2, Continued Figure 4 95 E. Hamilton Avenue, Campbell,CA 95008 Boring Diameter:4" Logged by: AA tto tg 1:14 SOIL DESCRIPTION aF"i o r, ° o Un d aa ; , q � qLJ 0 pciA y aaaa � v Aa un 15.5 16.0 M 16.5 Brown Sandy SILT 17.0 1-4 30 ML 10.9 122.0 (15'-16.5') 17.5 18.0 18.5 Hard drilling@19' 19.0 19.5 20.0 20.5 21.0 Brown Sandy SILT 21.5 (20'-21.5') 22.0 1-5 61 ML 7.0 131.0 --------------------------- 22.5 Boring was terminated at 21.5 feet below 23.0 ground surface 23.5 24.0 24.5 25.0 25.5 26.0 26.5 27.0 27.5 28.0 28.5 29.0 • 29.5 30.0 01-15-100.rep MFA Engineers&Associates • • FIGURES 9 01-15-100.rep MFA Engineers&Associates L�uL;Ayl�l GI Page 1 of 1 ■ �`f-� ! USGS Home �■A/■*.1/11.711 Contact USGS • seance lot a chancing world Search USGS EarthExplorer Page Expires In1:42:84 Home 2 New System Messages Profile Save Criteria Load Favorite Manage Criteria Logout atlablanf@sbcglobaLnet Dr3 Feedback Help 1 • I. �'Search Criteria Data Sets AtldNonel Criteria .`R '. ._.._ - .. ...__. .._.......__...._ .--- -- ....._ _. _._... _ Results . Search Criteria Summar y(snow) Clear Criteria I 11. Enter Search Criteria 1. ... ...v. `'' f 1 ;."r'1: rt it ..J I •' To narrow your search area:type in an address or I ', place name,enter coordinates or click the map to I 4 I fi y define your search area(for advanced map tools,view ; , ,• - 1 , ! the help documentation),andlor choose a date range. oar- I` y �r - I i Address/Place I, Path/Row Feature Circle 1 F1'�`.:. �, 15 E Hamilton Avenue,Campbell,CA 95008 f i •'�,�t '' ( yt J I I Show I Clear o -rv. - 'Click on an Address/Place to show the location on the map and , r y L f - if il i)r .. 1 5, II .*;addcoordinatestotheAreaofInterestControl. i eitI - r A Num i Andress/Place I Latitude I Longitude Z • `-+- _ 195 East Hamilton Avenue.Campbell I • 11 CA 95008.USA `372948 I-121S481 +1•. ^i� _ � yt ''Fa - • t Coordin d ates Preefined Area,I Shaperee':I:8,111.• ,( o • _. _ _ • n I s IDegree/Haute/8mM 1 Decimal T--- — __ ._. 1 ,! ' f- I. 1. let 37.2946,Lon;-121.9480 I i • . Use Map Add Coordinate LClear Coordinates I; • • I r I . I Date Range i'ResuitOptons. : ; -r.+,ti+I _,r a" Search from:01/01/1920 !'i:to:Icntos/2015 .°-' • - ' " 1 I. II.:Ir•it . ` _. I I Search months: (an) ( 4, . I. - i + f I r it r.:r r .n Rai �r") f i.• � '! Data a t. .I.'r,r:-7 ,'r': -.,lis•. ."`1,. {�' r r .) y__ i c.-ous�e .• . , ; y - 1 r i The up-to•date Goggle map is not for prachase or for download;it is to be used as a guide tor reference and search purposes ._.. __ .... .. . ..... . - only, Accessibility FOIA Privacy . Policies and Notices Google Maps API Disclaimer U.S.nepartmeat of the Interior U.S.Geoloekel Server - URL:httpU/eardrerptvcr.asg+.gov I.:Q.\ {. r m Pepe ntaetlefarmuUon:Itaeeses eov Y: Page Last termed:11/03/2014 • ^Aarpu°1 http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/ ' 1/6/2015 ......L 4:,•-ii....X.:.::::::: �. _ . �.�•.• S.SS :•i`: !.S.Si .S.. •'SS.S... ... _ '4' .i..,.. SS:L 'i=.'�• .,�� . N 1%: —4't—E-L----5. 7' ..' 3•••ss. 1 i ifL1_f ilt .` •, .2_l_r_fi —50 i05 a . AN4,:s.:,-. i I 1 1 I 1 1 I .1 ,_ __,I .......:,::::::::::, ...,.: ........t.,....:,..r.,.:,....:.:.:. ..,.....,,.,, .,.,.....„:„.,..„.....,...s:,......:.:.,.. ,.......„:±. _._, ,_, _ _ _ ,_ _ ,„,:.:_;.,,,::::::....:.:: . �•1� �.! •� 5.52 ......................................................... raw i• .S.14 i�'4,3?- �...i i ��.t.a i l s.l+• i,t; .< 3 2 SITE PLAN/SCALE N T.s SE E.KAMILTONAVE. SAN JOSE.CA 89008 • J • • HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS Number of pages including cover For New two story office Building RECEIVED 95-109 E. Hamilton Avenue DEC 07 2011, Campbell, CA 95008 Public Works Administration QROFESS/O 4,c) P�,1 AB/qN�q By 0 C57818 z u m Exp. s I R1! MFA Engineers & Associates eivm 3001 S. Winchester Blvd, Suite B Campbell, CA 95008 Date November 15, 20017 SITE INFORMATION GROSS STUDY AREA 14520 SF - 0.3333 acre IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATIONS Existing Impervious: 0.00 SF = 0.000 acre Pervious: 14,520 SF = 0.3333 acre Proposed Impervious: 11,042 SF = 0.2535 acre Landscape: 3,478 SF = 0.0798 acre Pervious: Net Increase 11,042 SF = 02535 acre Impervious Surface Breakdown Existing: Raw Land(C=0.10) 14,520 SF TOTAL 14,520 SF Proposed: Roof(C=0.70) 5,040 SF Paving(C=0.80) 370 SF Permeable pavers(C=0.55) 5,632 SF Landscape(0.10) 3,478 SF TOTAL 14,520 SF CALCULATION BASE VALUES,see attached sheet Figure A-2,Santa Clara County Drainage Manual Mean Annual Precipitation(MAP) 15 in Design Intensity 0.1 WEIGHTED RUNOFF COEFFICIENT(C) Pre-development RUNOFF COEFFICIENT(C=0.10) Post-development RUNOFF COEFFICIENT(C=0.50) is I Time of concenteration=Toverland+Tpipe Pipe length=228' Slope=0.02 C=140 for smooth pipe D=4" • V=1.318*C*R^0.63*S^0.54=1.318*140*(1/12)^0.63*(0.01)^0.54=3.2 fps (Ref.Fluid Mechanics&Hydraulics by Ronald V.Giles,2 nd Edition) Tpipe=228/3.2=71sec=1.2 Min Toveriand=(1.8*(1.1-C)*sq-root(L))/(S*100))^1/3=(1.8(1.1-.55)sq-root of 35')/2^1/3=5.86 Min (Recommended by ASCE) Tc=5 Min.is used for this calc. Q post develop=CIA=0.5*2.9*0.3333=0.483 CFS Q pre develop= 0.1*2.9*0.3333=0.097 CFS Q difference=0.387 cfs Q deli t 0.483 CFS 0.097 CFS 10 Min (delta t)/10=0.387/0.483 Delta t=8 Min Storage Volume Req'd=0.5.0.387*8*60=92.88 CF With a void ratio of 0.35 for gravel,gravel volume req'd=92.88/0.35=265 cubic feet Permeable interlocking Pavers volume storage capacity based on 75%of paved area =0.75 x(370 SF+5632SF)x(0.35 Void Ratio)x(10"/12 thick open-graded base)=1313 CF (25%of paved area will be used for concrete gutters and concrete paving against the building) OO V N.i. Y Drainage Manual 2007 gtirA:.-OAP County of Santa Clara, California IDF for M.A.P.of 16 Inches 10 5.. 1 re 4 0.1 —8--2-Year --0--5-Year '—x---10-Year —6—25-Year —e---50-Year t 100-Year 0.01 r 1 i 1 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Duration(hours) Figure B-3:IDF for M.A.P.of 16 Inches 8/14/2007 B-4 Santa Clara Valley C.3 Stormwater Handbook Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program Attachment 1V-1 Sizing for Flow-Based Treatment Controls Section B—Sizing Flow-Based Treatment Controls based on the California Stormwater BMP Handbook Flow>Approach This method uses the Rational Method equation to determine the design flow: Q=CIA Where: Q=the design flow in cubic feet per second(cfs), C=the drainage area runoff coefficient, I =the design intensity(in/hr),and A=the drainage area for the BMP(acres) Step 1. Determine the drainage area for the BMP,A= OM acres Step 2 Determine the runoff coefficient,C= 0-7-'from Table 3a or 3b It is more accurate to compute an area-weighted"C-factor"based on the surfaces in the drainage area(Table 3a),if possible,than to assume a composite"C-factor"such as those in Table 3b,especially for small drainage areas. Step 3. Determine from Figure 1 the mean annual precipitation(MAPsite)at the project site location: (see Section H. Step 4 for more explanation.) MAPsite= ; !S 'incliesl Step 4 Identify the reference rain gage closest to the project site from the following list and record the MAPgage: MAPgage= B,9inched Reference Rain Mean Annual Gages Precipitation(MAPgage) (in) San Jose Airport 13.9 Palo Alto 13.7 Gilroy 18.2 Morgan Hill 19.5 Step 5 Determine the rain gage correction factor for the precipitation at the site using the information from Step 3 and Step 4. Correction Factor=MAPsite/MAPgage=(Step 3)/(Step 4) Correction Factor= 1.a.79 IV.Treatment Control Sizing Criteria Attachment IV-1—Page 2 FINAL J:HandDev\Formv\G&D\Flow wmiahoctdoc May 20,2004 Santa Clara Valley C.3 Stormwater Handbook Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program Attachment IV-1 Sizing for Flow-Based Treatment Controls Section B—California Stormwater BMP Handbook Flow Annroach (continued) Step 6 Select the design intensity,I,for the reference gage closest to the site from the following list: I,Design Rainfall Intensity ty= 0 e /..7" Gages 85th Percentile Hourly Design Rainfall Rainfall Intensity Intensity (in/hr) (I) San Jose Airport 0.087 0.17 Palo Alto 0.096 0.19 Gilroy 0.11 0.21 Morgan Hill 0.12 0.24 The design intensity is twice the 85th percentile Hourly Rainfall Intensity. Step 7. Determine the corrected design rainfall intensity(I)for the site: Design intensity(site)=Correction factor*Design rainfall intensity for closest rain gage Design intensity(site)=(Step 5)*(Step 6)=10448316 18316 in/hr Step 8. Determine the design flow(0)using the Rational Method equation: Q=C*I*A Q=(Step 2) * (Step 7)*(Step 1) Q acres-in/hr Design Flow, Q =1 O otitZ cfs9 No conversion factor for correct units is needed for the rational formula because(1 acre-in/hr)*(43,560 sq.ft/acre)*(111/12 in)*(lhr/3600 sec) 1 ft 3/sec or cfs. IV.Treatment Control Sizing Criteria Attachment N-1—Page 3 FINAL J:UandDevlFormAc&b\Flow worksheet aoc May 20,2004 C.3 Stormwater Handbook Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program Table 3a—Estimated Runoff Coefficients for Various Surfaces During Small Storms(CDM,2003) Surface Runoff Coefficient (C Factor) Concrete 0.80 Asphalt 0.70 Pervious Concrete 0.60 Cobbles 0.60 Pervious Asphalt 0.55 Natural Stone(without grout) 0.25 Turf Block 0.15 Brick(without grout) 0.13 Unit Pavers on Sand 0.10 Crushed Aggregate 0.10 Grass 0.10 Roofs(from WEF/ASCE, 1992) 0.75 Notes: The above C-factors were estimated by selecting the lower range of the best available C-factor for each paving surface.These C-factors are only appropriate for small storm treatment BMP design,and should not be used for flood control sizing.Where available,locally developed small storm C-factors for various surfaces should be used. Table 3b—Estimated Composite Runoff Coefficients for Small Storms by Land Use(WEF/ASCE,2003) Description of Area Runoff Coefficient (C Factor) Business: Neighborhood Downtown 0.7 Residential: Single Family 0.30 Multi-unit,detached 0.40 Apartment 0.50 Multi-unit,attached 0.60 Industrial: Light 0.50 Heavy 0.60 Parks,cemeteries 0.10 Playgrounds 0.20 Unimproved 0.10 Notes: The above C-factors were estimated by selecting the lower range of the runoff coefficients listed for various land uses in\WEF/ASCE,j.992.Where available,locally developed small storm C-factors for various land uses should be applied.` IV.Treatment Control Sizing Criteria Attachment IV-1—Page 1 FINAL J:\ ndDcv\FormslG&D\FIowworkshc tdoc May 20,2004 • F d w, atei __ _ ,L.4- . ., \ \ 1`4, \`‘",- ' \ n ₹ter N'LO' �z-it- -. '�' �� �'ti } .i.. '�, ^A y '.j 9 ''0 a " y ,i I r, 1} c] aIlkidq p \\ F. �,�'t: F a� �, ✓fly �,�II d� .*_:*I:_,f. -:\f' A--€ v�� --, \.\'' ' I:Ili,' t \\' ,; , :\4,...,. .‘i;.'*tiri^,1 - \.k:-, ,i ktT # q 1 ya hl r• a� �� ' -\ \ \ \ q , e ft , `. , I r o "�,' ti C-• 'n� .ti/. \" g'6 b l A - , \ c MS� r 7l 1,, /, �1 V 5 , 1 � i ��<,,4: � � r�y .. Sk h4 \'.. " k'°-�F � J t�'I y_k aka I s NJ• �)2 'ti �.r a i�,]t i.' ` a \ 't- � •� � t_ r y y.s P�r �,�.. y��`�f.✓'� Sc:; ,,,,I;."TV ;'M z' }.` f ..' `. - �"14,:-,\,41 pp,�y,,- r k et 6•}r,'. , ,� ..i1`,-▪ , S: .\' 1 .� i VII + �:: '�, \ ! s Eq ' „,,t. 41 �� t ` ;� 9 . ,,so. \ ,,,, r $ .-- d` P. � ': m ,°s -',.,.::/13) 40.� fi-c�r\ Sq'-,10: g;.-22,„,__,,--; - �4`n s ` `w `w �"A,y, -" gs. 0.�:: ha�, -fj�=,./-16,,..„i,,,,11,,x tw?`1 a"�r r1i i-#�':. ��' � rs �� } .J�\•\Fk 'vN y. Figure 1 .. �f F4 ' • { `, [,. �S - I , �mzFYII 1 ,, s ,i\ Soil Texture and Mean '`�► � Annual Precipitation Depths N. � � t • �, ' ' ` ,'�-- � " x �i �r� ��- `� for the Santa Clara Basin _ ' d q $ C R r1' "�1 L 4 IF Legends Soil Texture ► ter_ ' ` +t�, ,� y (MRCS Hydrologic Soil Group) —.,..;28--'''''�. ` `` ti ""..--72,7",,-,_..^ •*" "'I �"', a. Dm Clay(D) /�/Street or Highway d ,,,,,,,—,--.7,-- e-\,, 1_ wi' Sandy Clay(D) /V Stream .',N.,..,,,.,-- °�au ,i lI - ''- � `,, Clay Loam(D) Jurisdictional Boundary } • i� "'� "^ ^w 4 ,. Silt Loam(B) 0 Rain Gage ®\ ,/,„„,,,,,„,, '""'~" ,4 ,.. .i � s4r ' 1 1 1 )Loam(B) � Mean Annual Precipitation Depths(Inches) ' } ,, ,-„,,,,„, s. , 4, �.' fr, s„ � .., R f�, tr , - Data Source:Santa Clara Valley Water District a ., ,et,.. , Revised March 2004 ^------"\-, ,...,rw''''' r � e�. ' r g ' ry 'A'Y� 3anfa Clara Valley � ���� �pe �` \ r7"4�yJ\l l , Urban icCofiA. :� a Pollution Prevention Program 0 1 :,,,,.,....„.„,...,,,=_3.....7.........,L...2,...— Miles �ti �y '" a , _ „` — , , P _, rneable Interlocking CAA _: to Pavers Typ.No.8 aggregate in openings Curb/edge restraint with cut-outs for overflow Win. (100 mm)thick No. 57 stone / drainage open-graded base ,,v2e,',', Concrete pavers min.31/8 in(80 mm)thick (4)/Bedding course 1%2 to 2 in.(40 to 50 mm)thick a g Optional geotextile on bottom and g 1 (typ.No.B aggregate) sides of open graded base '4-P." ¢ .` • � cf .,n Soil subgrade -- ., Note: ' - ASTM No.89 or 9 stone may be used in the paver openings. CITY OF CAMPBELL Print Form DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION 70 North First Street,Campbell,CA 95008 Ph. (408)866-2150;Fx.(408)376-0958 CHECKLIST FOR ON-SITE GRADING AND DRAINAGE APPLICATION NO(S): - ADDRESS: qs.. 1a9 C °- Hain, ClLte) Avert tie Instructions: This checklist provides advance notification to applicants of the City of Campbell's final on-site grading and drainage plans and submittal requirements. Using this checklist will expedite your application through the City's review process. Prior to submitting a final on-site grading and drainage plan list to the City Engineer,please place an"X"in the box indicating that you have complied or that the particular item does not apply. Review applicable sections,which are referenced in parentheses,before checking off each item. SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF ENGINEER OF WORK I HEREBY DECLARE THAT I AM THE ENGINEER OF WORK FOR THIS PROJECT,THAT I HAVE EXERCISED RESPONSIBLE CHARGE OVER THE DESIGN OF THE PROJECT,AND COMPLETION OF THIS CHECKLIST,AS DEFINED IN SECTION 6703 OF THE BUSINESS AND PROFESSION CODE,AND THAT THE DESIGN IS CONSISTENT WITH CURRENT STANDARDS. /02 6- /4- 7®� ' �SSIONAL F F M Signs re �� Date Q�d\P�\ANI G'i,LV% v t6 - Printed Name: W e �N� $ ?3 U. A.I.-Di ant c X51 �g w Expiration Date: r++ ®- , .E& ITEMS COMPLY NOT APPLY CITY COMMENTS I. GENERAL pr/OK E N/A 1. City standard on-site title sheet with applicable notes. / 2. 24"X36"sheet size used,including City Standard Fj/ OK N/A borders and Blueprint for a Clean Bay Plan Sheet. [ OK E N/A 3. Title Block/Scale/North Arrow Shown. 4. Plans must be clearly readable before and after r OK r- N/A microfilm reproductions. / 5. Engineer's name,number,expiration date and r✓OK E N/A signature included on all sheets. . 6. Vicinity Map shown(must be microfilmable). /OK r- N/A 7. Sheet Index and key map included for 3 or more r- OK f N/A sheets. 8. Cross sections as needed for clarity. p fl OK rc NIA Y-C..0 ae-diC 9. All adjacent streets labeled correctly. (`v OK �", N/A 10. Reference to City benchmark. r;/K r" N/A Page 1 of 3 COMPLY NOT APPLY CITY COMMENTS ' 11. Existing and proposed property easement lines. F- OK ✓N/A 12. Streets dimensioned(existing right-of-way, - . pavement,curb,gutter,sidewalk and [VO OK fi N/A parkways.)13. Adjacent Properties labeled as to use. OK ( /✓ N/A 14. Provide an Erosion/Sediment Control plan identifying temporary storm drain and BMP OK f N/A protection during construction. II. GRADING 15. Stencils at storm drainage facilities labeled as"Flows to Bay". �/" OK r` N/A 16. 1'contour lines(existing and proposed). r�K r N/A 17 Existing and proposed building locations and / pad elevations. F OK r N/A 18. Proposed elevations at high points,grade breaks, and other significant locations. /OK F7: N/A 19. - Finished grade elevations at building corners. i-- OK I— N/A 20. Lot corner elevations and the elevation at the high point in the yard. RA r N/A 21. Side and rear yard topography extending a sufficient distance beyond property line(20' � minimum)to determine that proposed grading Fe%K r N/A _ will not impede existing drainage patterns. 22. Existing and proposed fences or retaining walls. FT OK r�A 23. Quantities of cut and fill in cubic yards. r/K r N/A 24. Lots numbered and dimensioned per final map. _� 25. Grading conforms to approved preliminary I V! OK i N/A plans. r1/ OK r, N/A 26. Sufficient elevations on adjacent parcels must be • indicated to demonstrate that proposed grading will not impede existing drainage patterns. OK F- N/A III. DRAINAGE • 27. Location and elevation of overland release to public storm system shown. 1OK r N/A 28. Roof drainage downspout locations shown. OK F.- N/A 29. Interior drainage facilities identified(catch basin, . pipes,swales,etc.). VOK r"- N/A 30. Size,grate elevation and invert elevation of all inlets shown and cross section of drainage swales shown. rV OK r N/A 31. Pipe materials,slopes and sizes shown. ENZIK r N/A 32. Channelization of flows to adjacent properties will not be allowed. OK F- N/A ' Page 2 of 3 COMPLY NOT APPLY CITY COMMENTS Sheet flow acrosspublic property will not be allowed. �� "K N/A 33. P p Y 34. Runoff from impervious areas should be channeled to OK E N/A pervious areas. Direction of flow from impervious to pervious areas shown. 35. Amount of proposed pervious area and proposed1/OK N/A • impervious area(in square feet). 36. Drainage calculations using the numeric sizing ]—J OK N/A criteria,if applicable. - 37. Calculations sizing the selected BMP based on results /OK r" N/A from the numeric sizing criteria,if applicable. 38. Dimensions,cross sections and slopes,if ;"OK N/A applicable,of the selected BMP to treat the site shown. 39. Vegetated drainage swales,filter strips and/or other FlOK I- OK treatment devices shall be designed to store runoff and drain when at capacity. Elevations of swale features(i.e.top of swale,basin of swale,top of overflow grate,etc.)shown. • IV. NOTES 40. City of Campbell GENERAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE (—y OK n N/A NOTES are included on the plans. V. SEAL OF ENGINEER OF WORK 41. Seal of Engineer of Work shown on plans as follows: /OK r N/A SEAL OF ENGINEER OF WORK: I hereby declare that I am the Engineer of Work for this project,that I have exercised responsible charge over the design of the project as defined in Section 6703 of the Business and Professions Code,and that the design is consistent with current standards. The design shown hereon is necessary and reasonable and does not restrict any historic drainage flows from adjacent properties nor increase drainage to adjacent properties. I understand that the check of project drawings and specifications by the City of Campbell is confined to a review only and does not relieve me,as Engineer of Work,of my responsibilities for project design. A•t d 4_61 aint. /1,01/-2017- Engineer of Work Name,P.E. Date (Firm Name) 1�1 FA �� I tare�` 45"C ct (Firm Address) % VA �.� r1 / l ° ��j� /� fg� (Firm Telephone) ��• (�� RCE# i Expiration Date: 30_20 it-1 J:\FORMS\Templates\Land Development\Grading&Drainage\Checklist for On-Site Grading and Drainage STATIC form2.pdf Page 3 of 3 Rev.07/11 NOS 5 95 E HAMILTON AVE SiSTANTON °F Goy BLD2017-00569 at ARCHITECTURE 279-27-096 NEW 2-STORY OFFICE BUILDING; TO: City of Campbell INSTALL PL CLEANOUT BACKFLOW REQ (11/16/17 RE- FROM: Stanton Architecture SUBMITTAL) DATE: Nov 14th, 2017 PROJECT: 95 E Hamilton Ave, Campbell, CA 95008 Re: July 11th, 2017 Responses to comments-from: - Building Division - Planning Division - Public Works Department - • - Santa Clara County Fire Department - O'Brien Code Consulting, Inc. BUILDING DIVISION: 1. On Sheet A003, Panel #5, Please add phone number: (408) 866-2121. Response: Phone number has been added. See Sheet A003. 2. Please provide statement on accessibility on cover sheet to indicate that"this space and all work proposed by this permit will be in full compliance with California Access Requirements, CBC 2016. Response: Text has been added to cover sheet. • 3. On Sheet A200, please provide accessible women's restroom on ground floor Response: Accessible restroom on the ground floor is unisex. 4. On sheet A200 there is an accessible entrance from parking that appears to exit directly upon a drive lane. Individuals leaving the building through this exit are putting themselves in harm's way. Please revise to show a safe landing at the exterior of this door or relocate this entrance. Response: This exit has been set further back into the building to provide a safe landing for pedestrians. 5. On sheet A200, please show truncated domes at path of travel crossing traffic lane. (Section 111B-247.1.1 CBC 2016) - Response: Truncated domes have been added accordingly. 6. On sheet A200, Please remove light pole from accessible parking loading space. Response: No light poles exist in noted area. A structural pole has been removed from being an obstacle in the accessible parking space. 7. On sheet A201 Please provide accessible men's restroom on second floor Response: Accessible restroom on the second floor is unisex. 8. Sheets L-1 & L-2 are outdated and do not reflect A200. Please remove or update these sheets. Response: Plans have been removed. 9. Please remove grading plans from building permit sets. Response: Grading plans have been removed. 10. Please provide clearance from West Valley Sanitation District (408-378-2407). Response: Clearance has been provided. 11. If West Valley Sanitation District (W.V.S.D.) requires "check valve" protection on this project, please indicate that the dwelling waste lines shall comply with Section 710.1 California Plumbing Code 2016. (Waste lines on second floor are prohibited from running through check valve.) Response: Check Valve/Backwater Valve not needed for site. Elevation of lowest plumbing fixture is above the nearest manhole cover. 12. This project (new commercial) is required to comply with the California Green Building Code, Non-residential Mandatory requirements (Chapter 5) 2016 edition. Please indicate how compliance with Chapter 5 will be made. City of Campbell Verifies compliance per section 5.504.4.3.2 Documentation (1). Please submit 2 sets of product specification sheets for all material cited in Chapter 5. Response: Building design complies. _ 13. This project is subject to School fees. Contact Building Division to obtain fee payment form. Response: School fees form to be submitted along with full updated plan sets. 14. Please be advised that contractor license for this project has expired and cannot remain on this permit unless renewed. Response: License has been renewed. 15. On Sheet A200 you show an exterior stair exit 5 feet from the Property Line. Section 1027.5 CBC 2016 requires 10 feet clearance from property line for exterior stairways. - Response: Exterior stairway has been shifted to be located 10 feet from western property line. PLANNING DIVISION: - 1: Conditions of Approval: Please incorporate the attached conditions of approval into the plan set, copied onto a 24"x 34" plan sheet(s) Response: See sheet A002. 2. Setback to exterior stairs: Please illustrate the minimum 5-ft setback to the exterior stairs. Response: Exterior stairs have been moved to accommodate a 10 foot setback. See sheet A200. 3. Mechanical Equipment: All roof mounted equipment shall be screened. Response: All mechanical equipment on the roof is designed to be screened. 4. Signage: Please submit a sign application for any proposed signage. Please note that the maximum square footage for the"95 E Hamilton" address sign is six square feet. No advertising shall be included on this sign unless a sign application is approved. Response: The square area of the wall that is covered by lettering has been reduced to a total of six square feet. • 5. Trees to be retained/removed: Please review all plan sheets (e.g. demo, civil, landscaping, etc.) and correct inconsistencies regarding which trees are to be preserved and which trees are to be removed. Response: Inconsistencies have been corrected. 6. Tree protection plan: The applicant shall submit a Tree Protection Plan (embedded in the plan set)for review and approval by the community Development Director in consultation with Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC, prior to building permit submittal. The Tree Protection Plan shall substantially comply with the recommendations of the Monarch Consulting Arborist Report, or as may be amended by the Community Development Director. Response: The Tree Protection Plan is located in the Architectural drawings on pages A206 & A207. 7. Parking Lot Design and Construction: The parking lot shall be designed and constructed to minimize aeration deficit (compaction) and water deficit (dehydration)to the greatest extent feasible. The Design of the parking lot shall substantially comply with the recommendations of the Monarch Consulting Arborist Report, or as may be amended by the Community Development in consultation with Monarch Consulting Arborists, LLC. Response: Parking lot design will comply with recommendations for compaction and drainage to the best of contractor's abilities. 8. Revised plans to be resubmitted and approved: The applicant shall submit revised plans that substantially comply with the approved Tree Protection Plan and shall include sufficient detail to determine that trees will be adequately protected. • Response: See civil drawings 9. Pre-construction meeting with arborist: Prior to beginning work, all contractors involved with the project shall attend.a pre-construction meeting Richard Gressner from Monarch Consulting to review the tree protection guidelines. Drawings have been sent to Richard Gressner, and a pre-construction meeting will be attended by all contractors as required before commencement of construction. PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION: 1. Do not include the Street Improvement Plan set and the On-Site Grading Plan set in the Building Plan set. Response: Sheets have been removed. 2. Resolution No. 4354: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant is required to complete the Conditions of Approval for the project approved by the Planning Commission on December 13, 2016 (PLN2015-274 and 275). See attached resolution. Response: Conditions of Approval document is attached with responses to Planning Commission comments. 3. Public Improvements:The scope of this project triggers the requirements for Boulevard Frontage Improvements as required by Campbell Municipal Code 11.24.040.The City of Campbell's adopted Streetscape Standards identify this portion of Hamilton Avenue as an Image Street with very specific frontage improvement requirements.This project triggers the requirement for the installation of the streetscape improvements. The applicant will be required to construct these improvements and have them completed prior to occupying the building. The Streetscape Standards can be viewed here: (http://www.citvofcampbell.com/DocumentCenterNiew/168) Visit the City's website and follow the submittal requirements for Public Works once this application has been received entitlement. The checklist for the various plans required for submittal can be found on the City's Website at City Services > Public Works>Engineering > Land Developments > Documents, (or use this link: http://www.cityofcampbell.com/206/Documents). See instructions on: 1. Checklist for Grading and Drainage and • 2. Checklist for Street Improvement Plans. The Building Permit will not be issued until all Public Works Conditions of Approval have been satisfied. These Conditions of Approval are a supplement to the plans by MFA Engineers & Associates. The plans are not approved for construction. Further plan checking by Public Works will be required post entitlement. Response: Boulevard frontage improvements have been included. 4. Pervious Pavement: On Tuesday, September 27th, Public Works met with Ali Abiani, Civil Engineer on record, and discussed the relocation of the permeable pavers to be installed along the westerly surface parking areas to reduce the total amount of impervious area resulting in keeping below the size threshold for C.3 applicability and eliminate the need for storm water treatment measures. Response: Permeable pavers will be used throughout. FIRE DEPARTMENT—SANTA CLARA COUNTY - 1. Sheet A000: On the plans, provide a deferred submittal section that includes the following: A. Fire Service underground CFC B. Fire Sprinkler Suppression System C. Fire Sprinkler Monitoring System D. Two-Way Communication System Response: Notes have been added to cover sheet. See 3/A000. 2. Sheet A000: on the plans, provide height and area calculations, in accordance with CBC Chapter 5. Response: Area, height and width calculations have been added to cover sheet. See 3/A000. 3. Sheet A000: on the plans, specify that"all construction sites must comply with applicable provisions of the CFC Chapter 33 and Santa Clara County Fire Department Standard Detail and Specification S1-7." Response: Text has been added to sheet A000. 4. Sheet A001: on the plans, provide egress analysis showing: • A. Common path of travel distances • B. Maximum exit access travel distances .Response: All mechanical equipment.on the roof is designed to be screened. 5. Sheet A001: Revise occupant load calculations, as it is using a mix of both "Gross" and"Net"for the"Maximum Floor Area Allowances per Occupant" of CBC Table 1004.1.2 A. The Table specifies "Gross"to be used for"Business" Occupancy B. The areas used for permanent building components are included in "Gross" area calculations, although not included in "Net" area calculations. • (2016 IBC Code and Commentary Page 10-12) C. Vestibules, halls, etc., are not to be excluded; as these are areas for waiting and queue line. (2012 IBC Code and Commentary Page 10-12) D. Areas that the Table.specifies for"Net" area calculations are for Assembly use, Daycare, • Educational, and Laboratory. Response: All gross areas have been calculated and reflected on the updated exiting diagrams on sheet A001. Vestibules and hallways are included for both floors in the new table and diagrams. 6. Sheet A001 and A200: On the plans, specify that fire sprinklers are to be provided for the garbage shed, as such in a building per the definition of a"building" under CFC section 202. Dumpsters and containers with an individual capacity of 40.5 cubic feet or more are not permitted to be stored in a building, unless dumpsters and containers are protected by an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with CFC section 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2 or 903.3.1.3, in accordance with CFC#304.3.3. Response: Garbage shed is to be equipped with automatic sprinkler system. See sheet A200 for note. 7. Sheet A001 and A201: On the plans, provide a fire-rated enclosure for the interior exit stairway, in accordance with CFC 1023.1 and 1023.2. Response: The interior staircase is intended for use as a convenient means of circulation and is not to be used as a means of egress. The exterior stairway on the western side is to be used as the exit path and has been moved to be 10 feet away from the property line as requested. 8. Sheet A001 and A201: On the plans, provide a fire-rated exit passageway extension, as the interior stairway does not terminate at an exit discharge or the public way, but rather it discharges back into the building, in accordance with CFC 1023.1, 1023.3, 1023.3.1. Response: This staircase is not to be used as a means of egress. Hence a fully rated enclosure is not required. 9. Sheet A001 and A201: On the plans, the second floor's exterior exit stairway only has a fire separation distance of 4'—6"from the property line. However,the minimum fire separation distance from an adjacent lot line is 10' as specified in CFC 1027.5. On the plans, clarify how this will be addressed to meet the code requirements. Response: The exterior staircase has been moved to provide a 10' -0"setback from the western property line. 10. Sheet A001, A200, and A201: On the plans, demonstrate that where a vertical plane projecting from the edge of the exterior exit stairway is exposed to other parts of the building at an angle of less than 180 degrees, that the exterior wall shall be fire-rated, and provided with fire-rated opening protective, as specified in CFC 1023.2, in accordance with CFC 1027.6. • • • Response: The interior staircase is intended for use as a convenient means of circulation and is not to be used as a means of egress. The exterior stairway on the western side is to be used as the exit path and has been moved to be 10 feet away from the property line as requested. • 11. Sheet A100 and A200: On the plans, identify all the fire-rated walls. Response: All walls have been tagged to reference wall types on sheet A9O0. See sheets A200 & A201 for wall tags. • 12. Sheet A700: On the plans, specify that"an access panel is to be provided in the elevator shaft for the installation and servicing of the fire sprinkler, smoke detector, and heat detector that are to be • installed in the shaft, in accordance with CBC 3005.4.1, CFC 907.3.3., NFPA 72, 21.4, and Otis specification on drawing number HYD-MRL-POWBO." Response: See sheet A200 and A700 for requested added information. 13. Sheet A900: On the plans specify that"any/all through penetrations of fire-resistance-rated assemblies, that are created, shall be protected by an approved penetration firestop system installed as tested in accordance with ASTM E814 or UL 1479, in accordance with CBC 714.3.1.2." Response: See sheet A900 for requested added information. • 14. Sheet C-2, C-3 and C-5: On the plans, show the location of the underground fire service piping that will be tied into the city water main and the building's fire sprinkler system, as well as the locations of the fire department connection, the back-flow preventer, and the post-indicating valve, in accordance with CFC Chapter 9 and NFPA 14. Response: Shown on the civil plans. • 15. Sheet S-1: On the plans, provide the Ss value, which is needed for seismic bracing design and calculations of the fire sprinkler system. Response: Please see updated S-1 showing the lateral load design criteria. _ 16. Sheet M000, M201, M202: Provide smoke detection and shutdown controls for each Hvac air- handling system(s)that provide an aggregate air supply in excess of 2,000 cfm, in accordance with CMC 608.1 and CFC 907.3.1. • Response: Duct smoke detectors added to fan coil units on sheets M201 & M202. _ • 17. Sheet E000, E100, and E301: On the plans, provide an elevator shunt-trip breaker and also a 120VAC elevator shunt-trip control power breaker, in accordance with CBC 3005.5 and NFPA 72, • 21.4. Response: Shunt trip fused switch already shown on sheet E301. Shunt trip power breaker now shown in panel 'H' schedule. 18. Sheet E201 and E202: On the plans, demonstrate that the minimum footcandle levels will be met with the number and the location of egress lights with backup power shown on the plans in accordance with CFC 1008. Otherwise provide additional light fixtures with backup power on the plans in the paths of egress. Also provide a note on the plans specifying that"a lighting controller shall not control power to emergency egress lights" Response: New sheet E203 added showing egress path photometric values. 19. Sheet E202: On the plans, provide additional exit signs for change in egress direction, in accordance with California Fire Code, Section 1013. . Response: Additional exit signs provided. 20. Sheet P201 and P202: On the plans, provide drains and piping for the fire sprinkler system's test and drain valve Response: Floor Drain added to Mech Room on sheet P201. 21. Provide finish schedule and demonstrate that all finishes comply with CFC and CBC Chapter 8 • Response: See page A904 for finish schedule. O'BRIEN CODE CONSULTING, INC. A. The following plan review documents are based on the City of Campbell Building Regulations. For your convenience, the following comments are referred to the 2016 California Building, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical, Energy, and Green Building Codes (i.e., 2015 UMC, 2015 UPC, and 2014 NEC, as amended by the State of California and the City of Campbell) unless otherwise noted. In addition, structural review is based on the ASCE 7-10.- B. Please respond in writing to each comment by marking the attached comment list or creating a separate response letter. Indicate which detail, specification, or calculation shows the requested information. Your complete and clear responses will expedite the re-check and hopefully approval of this project. Thank you for your assistance. C. The following plan check comments reflect a review of building plans only for compliance with current adopted California Codes listed in comment A above. If site-related comments are applicable to this project, they will be generated by others (e.g., City Engineering, Public Works, Health, etc.). D. Please be sure to include on the resubmittal the architect's "wet" stamp,signature, registration - - number and expiration date on all sheets of plans. A digital/electrical stamp and signature is permitted per CA B&P Code Section 5536.1 and 2. CBC Section 107. Response: Wet stamps are included in the final set provided. E. Sheet A000: Regarding the "sheet list": a. Please amend the index to list architectural plan sheet A100 that was included in the plan set. b. Corrections are shown to the list of civil plan sheets in "white-out"and black ink pen. Please make sure these corrections are shown on all resubmitted plan sets. All sheets included in the plan set shall be listed on the"sheet list"in the order in which they appear in the plan set. Response: Necessary changes have been made. F. Sheet A000: "General Notes" note no.1 refers to the City of San Francisco Requirements. However this project is located in the City of Campbell. Please amend"General Notes" note no.1 to reference the correct project jurisdiction: City of Campbell. Response: Typo has been fixed to state the 'City of Campbell'. G. Sheet A000: Please add a clear and bold note to cover sheet of plans which indicates this project is a SHELL ONLY and that a separate tenant improvement plan submittal (and approval and permit) is required prior to occupancy of building (with ventilation, sanitation, exiting and other habitability and occupancy issues addressed; as well as potential requirements for smoke and heat venting; etc.). Response: This project is not anticipated to undergo a second tenant improvement procedure as the building will be ready to use upon completion of this "shell only" stage.The office will be used as an open floor area and spaces will be defined with furniture. H. Sheet A000: The"Project Statistics" list the building Type of Construction as V-B. In addition to the Type of Construction currently listed on the cover sheet of the plans, amend cover sheet of plans to provide a"project code summary"which specifies assumed occupancy classifications (s) and whether building is or is not equipped with fire sprinklers. Response: "Project Statistics" section has been updated on the cover sheet A000. I. Amend plans to correct or fill-in any and all incorrect or missing detail,section, and/or plan references (e.g., see sheets A200, A201, A902; etc.) Response: All references have been checked and fixed. J. Sheet A000: Amend plans to specify each specific item of construction which is intended to have a deferred submittal (e.g., solar panels shown on sheet A202; storefronts shown on sheets A300, A301, A901, etc.; Brise Soleil shown on sheets A200, and A902; interior and exterior stairways; etc.). Further, add a note which indicates "...these deferred submittals shall first be submitted to the project architect and engineer for review and coordination'following the completion of project architect/engineer review and coordination, a submittal to the City shall be made (for City review and approval), which shall include a letter stating this review and coordination has been performed and completed and plans and calculations for the deferred items are found to be acceptable (e.g., with regard to geometry , load conditions, etc.) with no exceptions." CBC Section 107.3.4.1 Response: Notes have been added to cover sheet. See 3/A000. K. Sheet A203:The Ground Level RCP shows several areas of"exposed concrete ceiling". However, the structural plans and details for the Second Floor Framing (I.e. Sheet S-3, second floor level is the first floor ceiling) show a wood TJI floor joist system with a plywood diaphragm floor with no concrete at the floor-ceiling assembly. Please review and reconcile this discrepancy between the architectural plans and structural plans and design. Response: Please see updated A203. It now shows hard lid ceiling. L. Sheet A204:The level 2 RCP shows several areas of "exposed concrete ceiling". However, the - structural plans and details for the Second Floor Framing (i.e. Sheet S-3, second floor level is the first floor ceiling) show a wood TJI floor joist system with a plywood diaphragm roof with no concrete at the roof-ceiling assembly. Please review and reconcile this discrepancy between the architectural plans and structural plans and design. Response: Please see updated A204. It now shows hard lid ceiling. M. Sheet A900: The exterior and interior wall and shaft wall types show all walls with metal stud framing. However, the structural plans show all exterior and interior walls and wood stud framing. Please review and reconcile this discrepancy between the architectural plans and structural plans and design. Response: Please see updated A900. Now the wood framing at 24"O.C. is called out: N. Sheet A901: The exterior wall details show all walls with metal stud framing. However, the structural plans show all exterior walls with wood stud framing. Please review and reconcile this discrepancy between the architectural plans and structural plans and design. Response: Please see updated A901. Now the wood stud is shown. O. Sheet C-0: Regarding the"grading and Drainage Notes" a. Note No.1 references the 2007 CBC, which is no longer current. Please amend Note No. 1 to reference the current adopted code: 2016 CBC. • b. Note no. 3 lists the date of the soils report as January 5, 2015. However, the actual date shown on the soils report submitted with the permit documents for this project is January 5, 2017. Please review and revise the Note No. 3 at the"Grading and Drainage Notes"to show the correct date. Response: Recommendations have been updated on sheet C-0. T-24 Energy Compliance Comments: Ti. The NRCC-ENV-01-E at the"B. Envelope Details— Framed" show the frame material as metal for the wall and the roof framing.The architectural plans show metal wall framing and concrete roof- ceiling framing. However the structural plans show wood wall and wood roof-ceiling framing. Please review and resolve this framing type discrepancy and revise the Title 24 ENV calculations accordingly to match the reconciled plans. - Response: T24 Envelope documents updated to show wood framing. Updated on sheets M301, M302, & M303. T2. The NRCC-ENV-01-E at the"E. Roofing Products (Cool Roof)" show "metal framed roof deck". The architectural plans show concrete roof-ceiling framing. However the structural plans show wood roof-ceiling framing. Please review and resolve this framing type discrepancy and revise the • Title 24 ENV calculations accordingly to match the reconciled plans. Response: T24 Envelope documents updated to show wood framing. Updated on sheets M301, M302, & M303. T3:Amend the architectural plans to clearly specify the exterior window and door glazing sizes and types such that the surface areas listed at the NRCC-ENV-01-E"G. Fenestration Proposed Areas and Efficiencies" and the NRCC-ENV-02-E forms can be confirmed. Response: Arch plans updated to show correct U-Value & SHGC. T4.The NRCC-ENV-04-E forms at the"E. Calculate Total Skylight Area" lists the Average Ceiling Height as 9 feet. However the building cross-sections on sheets A302 and A303 of the plans show 11-foot ceiling height at the first floor level and 12-foot ceiling height at the second floor level. Please make the plans and ENV calculations agree. • Response: Ceiling height for skylight updated to 12 feet on T24 documents. and updated on sheets M301, M302, & M303. • T5. The complete revised ENV calculations must be fully signed and permanently affixed to the plans. Response: Updated on sheets M301, M302, & M303. T6. This new nonresidential building less than 10,000 SF shall comply with the building commissioning design review requirements of the CEC Section 120.8(d) and shall include any requirements necessary for completing this review in the construction documents in accordance with CEC section 120.8(e). The following documents shall be provided for review: A. Design Phase Design Review i. Design Reviewer Requirements.The design reviewer shall be the signer of the Design Review Kickoff Certificate(s) of Compliance and Construction Document Design Review Checklist Certificate(s) of Compliance as specified in Part 1 Section 10-103(a)1. ii. The building owner or owner's representative shall include the Design Review Kickoff certificate of Compliance form in the Certificate of Compliance documentation as specified in part 1 Section 10-103. iii. The Construction Document Design Review Checklist Certificate of compliance shall list the items checked by the_design reviewer during the construction document review.The completed form shall be returned to the owner and design team for review and signoff. The building owner or owner's representative shall include this form in the Certificate of Compliance documentation as specified in part 1 Section 10-103. Response: Sheets M000 & P000 updated to show requirements. T7. The NRCC-PLB-01-E lists the number of water heaters as 4. However the"Plumbing Fixture Schedule" on sheet P000 and the plumbing floor plans show a total of five water heaters (four identical water heater types at the bathrooms and one water heater at the Kitchenette/Break Room). Please make the plans and PLB compliance forms agree. Response: Updated on sheets M301, M302, & M303. T8. The complete revised PLB calculations must be fully signed and permanently affixed to the plans. Response: Updated on sheets M301, M302, & M303. T9. Sheet A204: The types of lights shown at the Level 2 Meeting Room, on the Level 2 Reflected Ceiling Plan, do not match the types of lights shown on the Second Floor Lighting Plan on Sheet E202. Please review and reconcile this plan discrepancy. Response: Lights modified on E drawing to match A drawing. T10. Sheet A204: Revise the LTI calculations to reflect any changes to the types of light fixtures shown at the level 2 Meeting Room mentioned in the previous plan.check comment.The revised plans/LTI calculations will be reviewed at recheck.Additional comments may be required at recheck. Response: LT1 revised. T11.The NRCC-LTI-01-E at the "A. General Information"table lists the "Climate Zone"as 3. However, the project is located at Climate Zone 4. Please review and revise the"A. General Information"table accordingly. Response: 3 changed to 4. T12. The NRCC-LTI-01-E at the "H. Indoor Lighting Schedule..."table lists 30 for the number of luminaries for the light fixture type"F1/F1 E". However, the lighting plans on Sheets E201 and E202 show 36 for the total number of F1/F1 E light fixtures. Please make the plans and LTI calculations agree. - Response: 36 is correct and entered on revised LT1. T13.The complete revised LTI calculations must be fully signed and permanently affixed to the plans. Response: Forms signed and affixed. Structural Comments: Note:The calculations booklet pages are not numbered. Plan check comment references to calculation page numbers below are based on the cover sheet of the calculations booklet counted as the starting calculations page 1. S1. Please be sure to include on the resubmittal the engineer's "wet"stamp, signature, and - registration number on all sheets of plans depicting structural designed elements and cover sheets of calculations. A digital/electronic stamp and signature is permitted per CA B&P Code Section 5536.1 and 2. CBC Section 107. Response: Wet stamps are included for all future submitted drawings. . S2. Sheet S-2: Specify on plans that the soil engineer shall be retained to provide observation and testing services during the grading and foundation phase of construction per soil report recommendations and that inspection and testing reports shall be submitted to the Building Department. Response: Please see the added note on S-2. S3. Calculations Sheet no. 2: Regarding the"Design Criteria": A. The Roof Dead Load shown in the calculations is less than the Roof Dead Load shown on Plan Sheet S-1 at the Design Criteria. Please make the plans and calculations agree. B. The 2nd Floor Loading shown on Calculations Sheet no. 2 and at the Design Criteria .. on Plan Sheet S-1 list the Floor Live Load as 40 psf. However, for this office building • the floor live loads specified in CBC Table 1607.1 list design live loads for the office use that is greater than 40 psf (i.e. corridors above the first floor = 80 psf; Office live load = 50 psf; Balcony area which is considered an assembly area = 100 psf; stairs and exits = 100 psf;.etc.). Please review and revise calculations throughout and plans • to show the correct project live loads accordingly. C. In office buildings where partition locations are subject to change, provisions for partition weight shall be made, whether or not partitions are shown on the construction documents in accordance with CBC Section 1607.5, UNLESS the design live load of the second floor office areas is 80 psf or greater. Please review and revise plans/calculations throughout accordingly. Response: A: Please see S-1 for the updated dead load for the building. B & C: Thanks for the good comments. As you can see from updated S-1 and calculations, the design live load 100 psf is to be used so that all cases will be covered in the structural design. Also please see design criteria showing the floor live load 100 psf. S4. Calculations Sheet no. 3: The TJI Roof Span table included in the calculations booklet is the March 2014 version for Western Canada, which is not the current span table. Please amend the calculations to show the Roof Span Table from the Trus Joist TJI Joist Specifier's Guide TJ-4000 (dated February 2017). Response: Please see the updated calculations using Forte 5.3 by Weyerhaeuser using the most • current building code & NDS 2015. S5. Calculations Sheet nos. 4 through 6: Several of the Enercalc calculations sheets reference the 2000/2003 IBC and previous Code Edition referenced standards (i.e. NDS 1997/2001, etc.), which are no longer current. Since this project was submitted for building permit after January 1, 2017 (City stamped received date is May 22, 2017), the current adopted Code is the 2016 CBC with applicable current Referenced Standards listed in Chapter 35. As a result, please review and amend the Enercalc calculations to be based on the current adopted Code: 2016 CBC (based on the 2015 IBC) and applicable Referenced Standards (i.e. ANSI/AWC NDS-2015, ACI 318-14, etc.). Revise the plans if required by the revised calculations. The revised calculations and plans will be reviewed at recheck. Additional comments may be required at recheck. Response: Please see the updated calculations using Forte 5.3 by Weyerhaeuser using the most current building code & NDS 2015. S6. Sheet S-5: Please amend the Roof Framing Plan to show the skylight shown on the architectural Roof Plan on Sheets A201 and A202. Provide structural details on the plans and structural calculations to justify any framing modifications as a result of the skylight. Response: Please see updated S-5 for the revised framing for the skylight at roof. S7. Calculations Sheet no. 7: The TJI Floor Span table included in the calculations booklet is the March 2014 version for Western Canada, which is not the current span table. Furthermore,the maximum live loads shown at the Floor Joist span tables in the Truss Joist TJI Joist Specifier's Guide TJ-4000 (dated February 2017) are 40 psf, which is less than the required live loads for this office building project (refer to comment S3 above). Please provide calculations to justify the TJI floor joists specified on the 2nd Floor Framing Plan on Sheet S-3 for review. The floor joist calculations will be reviewed at recheck. Additional comments may be required at recheck. Response: Please see the updated calculations using Forte 5.3 by Weyerhaeuser using the most current building code & NDS 2015. S8. Sheet A002: Detail no. 2 shows glass guards at the stairway. As a result, please provide the following in accordance with CBC Section 1015.2.1: A. Structural guard construction details and calculations showing the proposed glass guards are capable of resisting a 50 plf load and a 200 lb. concentrated load (loads need not be assumed to act concurrently) applied in any direction. CBC 1607.8 • B. Panel fillers shall be designed to withstand a horizontally applied normal load of 50 pound on an area equal to 1 square foot. CBC 1607.8.1.2 and ASCE 7-10 Section 4.5.1 C. Show compliance to CBC Section 2407 regarding the type of glass, thickness of glass, loads and support. D. A safety factor of four shall be used in all calculations. CBC 2407.1.1 Response: The type of the glass guard is not known yet. This portion will be treated as deferred submittal and to be listed on S-1 under deferred submittal. S9. Calculations Sheet no. 15: The Seismic Base Shear calculations show the"Site Class"as "B". However, according to the Soils Report page no. 4 the "Site Class"for this project is "O". Please amend the Seismic Base Shear calculations to show the correct project"Site Class" ("D"). Response: Please see the updated calculations for Using Site Class D: S10. Sheets S-3 and S-5, and Calculations Page no. 19: The Second Floor Framing Plan shows shear walls at Roof Level Line D and Line F supported by beams. Please locate/provide calculations to check each beam for dead + live + wind/seismic loads. Check uplift and connections at the ends of each beam. Be sure to multiply the seismic load by the omega factor. ASCE 7-10 Section 12.3.3.3 Response: Sheets have been updated. S11. Sheets S-3 and S-5, and Calculations Page no. 20: The Second Floor Framing Plan shows shear walls at Roof Level Line 4.2 supported by floor joists and beams. Please locate/provide calculations to check each floor joist and beam for dead + live +wind/seismic loads. Check uplift and connections at the ends of each beam. Be sure to multiply the seismic load by the omega factor. ASCE 7-10 Section 12.3.3.3 Response: Sheets have been updated. S12. Sheet S-2: Please locate in on the plans and calculations the lateral-force-resisting-system for the floor level at gridline 1. Plans and calculations appear to show lateral-force-resisting elements (shear walls and Simpson Strongwalls) in the front-back direction at floor level gridlines 3 and 5 only. Response: Please see updated S-3. The steel moment frame on the middle now is clearly indicated as M.F. S13. Calculations sheet nos. 26 and 27: Calculations are provided for "Beam to column connection design of moment frame". However, plan checker is unable to locate the referenced moment frame in the lateral calculations. Furthermore, the R-value used in the seismic base shear calculations is for wood framed shear walls. Please clarify and locate the proposed moment frame on the plans. Revise lateral calculations accordingly. The moment frame will be reviewed at recheck. Additional calculations may be required at recheck. Response: Please see updated S-3. The steel moment frame on the middle now is clearly indicated as M.F. S14. Sheet S-2: The Foundation Plan shows a note referencing detail no. 1/S-5 at the concrete slab. However, plan checker is unable to locate a detail no. 1 on Sheet S-5 of the plans. Please locate/provide referenced detail for review and coordinate detail references on the plans accordingly. Response: That is a call-out mistake. It is 1/S-6. Please see updated S-2 for calling out 1/S-6. S15. Sheet S-3: Please complete the partially blank detail "tag" shown at gridline D (near the intersection with gridline 4). Response: Please see updated S-3 for calling out the detail referred. S16. Sheet S-5: Please complete the partially blank detail "tag" shown at gridline 4.2 (between gridlines E and F). Response: Please see updated S-5 for calling out the detail referred. S17. Sheet S-6: Notes at detail nos. 12, 17, and 19 references detail 13/S5. However, plan checker is unable to locate a detail no. 13 on Sheet S5. Please locate/provide referenced detail for review and coordinate detail references on the plans accordingly. Response: That is the typo. It should be $6. Please see updated S-6. S18. Sheet A200 of'the plans show a new detached "Garbage" enclosure. Please locate/provide structural plans,.calculations, and details on the plans for the proposed "Garbage" enclosure for review. This detached structure will be reviewed at recheck. Additional comments may be required at recheck. Response: Please seethe added structural drawings for the garbage enclosure. S19. If the Foundation Plan will be revised, then submit a letter from the soil engineer confirming that the revised foundation plan, grading plan, and specifications have been reviewed and that it,has been determined that the recommendations in the soil report are properly incorporated into the plans. Response: Please see the attached review letter from soil engineer: S20. Sheets SSW1 and SSW2: The Simpson SSW Strongwall detail sheets dated September 21, 2009, are no longer the current detail sheets. Please replace Sheets SSW1 and SSW2 with the current Simpson Strongwall SSW detail sheets dated August 8, 2016, which is based on the current adopted 2016 CBC (2015 IBC). All applicable details from Sheets SSW1 and SSW2 shall be identified (i.e. "tagged") on the Foundation and Framing Plans. Response: Please see the added most updated SSW1 & SSW2 and the details to be used and their call out from S-2. S21. Obtain two (2) copies of the City of Campbell Special Inspection and Testing form and include - them with your resubmittal, completely filled-out and signed by all requested parties. Note that special inspection per CBC 1704 is required for the items listed on Sheet S-1.1 of the plans. Please note: City Special Inspection forms are available for download from the City of Campbell website at http://www.ci.campbell.ca.us/Building/Resources.html Response: Please see the two copies of special inspection form attached with the resubmittal. MEMORANDUM :_•_ Community Development Department oRCHARo• Planning Division Date: December 13, 2017 To: Doris Quai Hoi From: Cindy McCormick, Senior Planner Subject: Public Works (Grading Plans)Plan Check Project Address 9calyitimiagprkt 3 The Planning Division has reviewed the grading plan submittal for a new office building proposed at 95 E. Hamilton Ave. Based on a review of the grading plans and the Planning Commission's December 13, 2016 approval of a Site &Architectural Review Permit (PLN2015- 274) and Tree Removal Permit (PLN2015-275), the following issue(s)must be addressed prior to Planning Division clearance for issuance of a Grading Permit: PLAN REVISIONS 1. Revised Plans to be submitted and approved: The applicant shall submit revised grading plans that substantially comply with the approved Tree Protection Plan (yet to be approved) and shall include sufficient detail (e.g., materials, construction methods, etc.) to determine that trees will be adequately protected. Please pay particular attention to all work within the Tree Protection Zone (see next page) including but not limited to the construction and materials of the parking lot, the construction and foundation for the trash enclosure, the construction, depth, and location of the landscape border, and the construction, depth, and location of the vertical curb. NOTE: Please work with the consulting Arborist, Richard Gessner from Monarch Consulting, to prepare appropriate grading and drainage plans. It is highly recommended that you coordinate with both the consulting arborist and the Public Works Depaitiuent to ensure everyone's comments are addressed. Please correct pages Cl & C6 which incorrectly identify trees to be saved or removed. The parking lot design shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of a grading permit. 2. Pre-Construction Meeting with the Project Arborist: Prior to beginning work, all contractors involved with the project shall attend a preconstruction meeting with Richard Gessner from Monarch Consulting to review the tree protection guidelines. Access routes, storage areas, and work procedures will be discussed. NOTE: The project planner, Cindy McCormick, shall attend the pre-construction meeting along with Richard Gessner. - 70 North First Street•Campbell,CA 95008-1423•TEL(408)866-2140•FAX(408)866-5140•E-MAIL plamung@cityofcampbell.com Planning review of Grad' Plans Page 2 of 5 95 E. Hamilton 3. Tree Protection: Tree protection focuses on protecting trees from damage to the roots, trunk, or scaffold branches from heavy equipment. The tree protection zone (TPZ) is the defined area in which certain activities are prohibited to minimize potential injury to the trees. The critical root zone distance (CRZ) is the maximum encroachment distance on one side of an individual tree. Retaining trees to be removed later (trees 404 and 406) can create larger buffer areas of protection even though the trees will be removed later in the process or after completion of the project. It will be necessary to have protection regimes and barriers removed or moved during different phases of construction. For example, during grading and initial construction, protection fencing can be placed around the trees—but as the storm water system or parking lot construction occurs, more room will be required to encroach closer to the trees. NOTE: The image below indicates where the Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) and Critical Root Zone (CRZ) radii are located around the trees. Alternative materials or construction design in the parking lot is required within the Critical Root Zone at a minimum. Any grading, compaction, or root zone disturbance in the Critical Root Zone area would likely cause the trees to go into decline. (E)2,5'TREE TO BE 405 _ �,,403- , ,= w SAVED— " ���= I a (E)24'TREE TOBE 1 r a REW,ns ;Elh I, 402 ; REL,i''CC3 ••;� t a r �� r a REMOVE(El 1r , � .. - r RELi'JL C J—'i° • ,(E)18-REDWCCD ,o - % ♦ ! a r TO EE SAVED— ,-- **,,CRZ P.arlitm of Approximately 20 to 25 Feel ♦♦ - r 5 E)48'REDYJCOD '• i s r♦ { ♦a TO BE SAVED ♦ _ 4'. ,,_.r `•"r T^P-Z Rodiu2 of Approximately 40 to 45 F Set t L `` ., ♦ rFFL~F[.y REM CC3 - • I A ♦I ♦ 401 24! ., I I 2 q %ROUND LEVEL EUILDI'r10 FOOT?RI;IT E;i y :v - - fi� `\ r"'� [ln_ I r3 I 1 f 70 North First Street•Campbell,CA 95008-1423•TEL(408)866-2140•FAX(408)866-5140•E-MAIL planning@cityofcampbell.com Planning review of Gra( Plans Page 3 of 5 95 E. Hamilton 4. Parking Lot Design and Construction: Mitigating construction damage around retained trees is about protecting the soil and root zone from disturbance. The less alterations to the existing conditions the better for the trees. Because the parking lot is proposed to be placed within the TPZ and CRZ of trees to be retained, there will be significant root zone disturbance and fragmentation. The coast redwoods are large and have large spreading roots that provide stability along with water and nutrient uptake. Any grading, especially soil cuts or trenching within the TPZ or CRZ will be particularly detrimental a. The parking lot shall be designed and constructed to minimize aeration deficit (compaction) and water deficit (dehydration) to the greatest extent feasible. The design of the parking lot shall substantially comply with the recommendations of the Monarch Consulting Arborist Report, or as may be amended by the Community Development in consultation with Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC. a. The parking lot will need to be modified within the TPZ and especially within the- CRZ of trees #402, 403, and 405. There is potential to raise the grade in this area and use biaxial geogrid, permeable pavers, or other materials and techniques to encroach the way the plans indicate while maintaining the parking spaces. b. Use paving material that does not rely on the strength of a compacted sub-base for strength. This may be accomplished by reinforcing the surface layer material. Place geotextile fabric at the bottom of the sub-base to reduce displacement into the parent soil along with a reduction in compaction requirements. c. There are some options for using either structural soils under permeable pavers or placing biaxial Tensar BX-1100 georgid on grade with base and pavers on top. Use biaxial Tensar BX-1100 or equivalent to manufacturer specifications on grade. d. There are other options for the parking area under the existing trees which include open form pavers such as Grasspave®, Grass-cel®, or other porous paving grids. These can be placed on grade within the TPZ or CRZ allowing water and air to move to the native soil reducing compaction and the need for sub-base treatments. e. The first priority for the parking lot construction is to adopt a no -dig policy and incorporate a design plan that will minimize soil compaction and root disturbances around trees #402, 403, and 405. Use the thinest material possible to achieve structural compliance and use porous material that allows for water infiltration under the surface. Adjust the finished grade to be above the natural grade without digging for a sub-grade treatment. In this instance the pavement will be higher up and edge treatments or curbing also need to be constructed above grade. f. The parking lot design shall provide enough space to accommodate future growth. The curb treatment is literally on top of the tree trunk flares as is the case with trees 402 and 405. Creating larger pop-out spaces near the trees to help prevent damage now and accommodate growth is required. 70 North First Street•Campbell,CA 95008-1423•TEL(408)866-2140•FAX(408)866-5140•E-MAIL planning@cityofcampbell.com ,i Planning review of Grad Plans Page 4 of 5 95 E. Hamilton '5. Tree Protection Plan: The applicant shall submit a Tree Protection Plan (embedded in the plan set) for review and approval by the Community Development Director in consultation with Monarch Consulting Arborists LLC, prior to grading permit submittal. The Tree Protection Plan shall substantially comply with the recommendations of the Monarch Consulting Arborist Report, or as amended by the Community Development Director. a. Tree protection locations should be marked before any fencing contractor arrives. b. A final inspection by the city arborist at the end of the project will be required prior to removing any tree protection fence. Replacement trees shall be planted at this time. c. Tree Protection Zones and Fence Specifications: Tree protection fencing should be established prior to the arrival of construction equipment or materials on site. Fencing should be comprised of six-foot high chain link fence mounted on eight foot tall, 1 7/8-inch diameter galvanized posts, driven 24 inches into the ground and spaced no more than 10 feet apart. Once established, the fencing must remain undisturbed and be maintained throughout the construction process until final inspection. The fencing should be maintained throughout the site during the construction period and should be inspected periodically for damage and proper functions. Fencing should be repaired, as necessary, to provide a physical barrier from construction activities. d. Tree Protection Signs: All sections of fencing should be clearly marked with signs stating that all areas within the fencing are Tree Protection Zones and that disturbance is prohibited. Text on the signs should be in both English and Spanish. e. Grading and Bioretention: All grading activity should be limited to outside the CRZ at a minimum. This will create conflicts with the grading and drainage plans. The bioretention system runs along the west and more importantly the north end of the site behind the trees. If this system and four inch pipe is to be installed in these locations the root zones will be fragmented on two sides and trees could become unstable. The bioretention system needs to be modified and outside of the CRZ of any tree to be retained. f. Monitoring: Any trenching, construction or demolition that is expected to damage or encounter tree roots should be monitored by the project arborist and should be documented. The site should be evaluated by the City arborist (or a qualified ISA Certified Arborist approved by the Community Development Department) after construction is complete, and any necessary remedial work that needs to be perfoinied should be noted. g. Restrictions within the Tree Protection Zone: No storage of construction materials, debris, or excess soil will be allowed within the Tree Protection Zone. Spoils from the trenching shall not be placed within the tree protection zone either temporarily or permanently. Construction personnel and equipment shall be routed outside the tree protection zones. 70 North First Street•Campbell,CA 95008-1423•TEL(408)866-2140•FAX(408)866-5140•E-MAIL planning@cityofcampbell.com Planning review of Gradi Flans Page 5 of 5 95 E. Hamilton h. Root Pruning: Root pruning shall be supervised by the project arborist. When roots over two inches in diameter are encountered they should be pruned by hand with loppers, handsaw, reciprocating saw, or chain saw rather than left crushed or torn. Roots should be cut beyond sinker roots or outside root branch junctions and be supervised by the project arborist. When completed, exposed roots should be kept moist with burlap or backfilled within one hour. i. Boring or Tunneling: Boring machines should be set up outside the drip line or established-Tree Protection Zone. Boring may also be performed by digging a trench on both sides of the tree until roots one inch in diameter are encountered and then hand dug or excavated with an Air Spade® or similar air or water excavation tool. Bore holes should be adjacent to the trunk and never go directly under the main stem to avoid oblique (heart) roots. Bore holes should be a minimum of three feet deep. j. Timing: If the construction is to occur during the summer months supplemental watering and bark beetle treatments should be applied to help ensure survival during and after construction. k. Tree Pruning and Removal Operations: All tree pruning or removals should be performed by a qualified arborist with a C-61/D-49 California Contractors License. Tree pruning should be specified according to ANSI A-300A pruning standards and adhere to ANSI Z133.1 safety standards. Trees that need to be removed or pruned should be identified in the pre-construction walk through. If you have any questions pertaining to these comments, please do not hesitate to give me a call or email for clarification. PROJECT PLANNER CONTACT: Cindy McCormick, Senior Planner (408) 871-5103; cindym@cityofcampbell.com COPY: Paul Kermoyan, Community Development Director Doris C. Quai Hoi, Public Works Department Richard Gessner, Monarch Consulting 70 North First Street•Campbell,CA 95008-1423•TEL(408)866-2140•FAX(408)866-5140•E-MAIL planning@cityofcampbell.com TO: Doris C.Quai Hoi .OF •CA-4/./4 _, Bill Bruckart, Building Official Assistant Engineer A Cs' City of Campbell City of Campbell • 70 North First Street (.) �:�•. - mac'" att Campbell,CA 95008 r.` Phone:(408)866-2157 Fax: (408)376-0958 E-Mail: dorisuh(acitvofcampbell.com rtt" °RCHA1;� . Date: 12/12/2017 Public Works Department Land Development Division The Returning Redlined Plans are: Plan Check Status: Submittal Package from: ® Grading and Drainage(reference) ®1St Submittal Date: 12/12/17 ® Public Works ® Off-Site Street Improvement 2nd Plan Check Date: Doris C. Quai Hoi (reference) ❑ 3rd Plan Check Date: ❑ Final Map ❑ Final Date: Project Address: 95 E Hamilton Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 Enclosure(s): ❑ Redlined plan check comments .1 SI Plans and Grading Plans ❑,Plan check comments list(s) ® Soils Report Itemized response letter to each item ❑Assessor's Parcel Map ❑ Other 1,E Attached is the package for the application of 95 E Hamilton Avenue. Please review the grading plans and provide redlined comments,if any by December 20th. Please also provide a building permit number. Please contact Public Works immediately should you need additional information. Sincerely J:\LandDev\Plan Check Comments\t-Specific Projects-Active Project in Progress\Hamilton Ave E 95\Transmittal to Buildng.docx Rev 11/13 �; � U _.r7 _ r. 0 f•\�i;;. . 0 A A Building Inspection Division 70 North First Street L� Phone: (408)866-2130 Campbell,CA 95008 • oRCHAIL° December 12, 2017 MFA Engineers&Associates Ali Abiani 3001 S. Winchester Blvd. Suite B Campbell, CA 95008 Subject: Plan Check Comments for Building Permit Application(BLD2017-01538) 95 E. Hamilton Ave. (SITE GRADING, DRAINAGE & SITE IMPROVEMENTS) Dear Mr. Abiani, I have completed the plan check of the application submitted to our office on December 07, 2017 concerning the permit identified above. Please review the items identified below and provide the information requested. Corrected and resubmitted plans shall be in 4 sets or more. 1. On C-2, Path of travel from Accessible parking lacks truncaed domes to indicate traffic lane. 2. On C-2, Same path does not allow entry into building. It terminates at wall. 3. On C-2, Strike side clearance at main entry door appears to be less than required. Please review Sec 11B-404 CBC 2016 for requirements. 4. On C-2, Exterior stairway is not allowed within 10 feet of property line. Please review the identified items and make all requested changes. If you have any questions concerning this letter, or your application, please contact the Building Inspection Division at(408) 866-2130 immediately. Sincerel , ch Bill Bruckart Building Official cc: Building Permit File 95 Hamilton LLC r rl tht Smart Permits: Building -- BLD2017-01538 Status PCK i_t ₹ -1 t �_ i i Name:MFA ENGINEERS & ASSOCIATES Updated: 12/12,'2017 BB Address:95 E HAMILTON AVENUE Building I i Description: Master # E.LL..:I 17-i 1 Project: I SITE GRADING, DRAINAGE E AND SITE IMPF'IIVEMENTS FOP N1E."/ c Cfr4,1MEPICAL _ wm�N .. _ v . . „,. wm... .. ,r .. . — r ,T s Iambi * Work Covered by this Permit Received 12/1212017 f R _.i .._ .__ f _ q _ Pe-roofing: Issued Building: Electrical: Plumbing. Mec hanical:pan! -r r Y r 1 fi I Expires, Type n. . .. Finale+� rading & Site Im 4 rovements of "Jork , • 4 Existing ' ommercial Proposed Use: Description Type of Con at.: ype '' A Valuation: Occ. Classy = Valuation: ' $5,000. ,.,,, ....,.._ ...4. , Census Cat: Haz. Mat.: Fire Sprinklers: :: i f _. c 95 E HAMILTON AVEMA- ® UZ 3 WW Cr W BLD2017-01538 a C � g 279-27-096 30 SITE GRADING, om DRAINAGE & SITE h o q IMPROVEMENTS FOR (N) h COMMERICAL BLDG h 95 E HAMILTON AVE m BLD2017-01538 <02 279-27-096 SITE GRADING, a t -:, i.7, DRAINAGE & SITE E _ t IMPROVEMENTS FOR (N ) m a COMMERICAL BLDG o i- 3 w , ® 95 E HAMILTON AVE 95 E HAMILTON AVE H v W BLD2017-01538 BLD2017-01538 w a o � 279-27-096 279-27-096 s O SITE GRADING, SITE GRADING , DRAINAGE & SITE DRAINAGE & SITE T' IMPROVEMENTS FOR (N) IMPROVEMENTS FOR (N) 30 COMMERICAL BLDG COMMERICAL BLDG 330 00 95 E HAMILTON AVE 95 E HAMILTON AVE 1°1 D'<- BLD2017-01538 BLD2017-01538 -< 3 279-27-096 279-27-096 f SITE GRADING, SITE GRADING, 1,,- '! DRAINAGE & SITE DRAINAGE & SITE 0 _ 1 IMPROVEMENTS FOR (N ) F R IMPROVEMENTS O (N) 'ff4; ZA. COMMERICAL BLDG COMMERICAL BLDG o TO: Doris C.Quai Hoi �V •c4 e Cindy McCormick, Project Planner Assistant Engineer A -• �� Campbell City of City of Campbell ,� 70 North First Street U -.joy. t"' Campbell,CA 95008 © -. r`1 �, © Phone:(408)866-2157 ,1 Fax: (408)376-0958 pro. E-Mail:dorisgh(&eitvofcampbell.com G . °*CHAO • Date: 12/12/2017 Public Works Department Land Development Division The Returning Redlined Plans are: Plan Check Status: Submittal Package from: El Grading and Drainage(reference) ®1st Submittal Date: 12/12/17 ® Public Works ® Off-Site Street Improvement 0 2nd Plan Check Date: Doris C. Quai Hoi (reference) ❑ 3rd Plan Check Date: ❑ Final Map 0 Final Date: Project Address: 95 E Hamilton Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 Enclosure(s): ❑ Redlined plan check comments ® SI Plans and Grading Plans ❑ Plan check comments list(s) ® Soils Report ❑ Itemized response letter to each item 0 Assessor's Parcel Map ❑ Other Attached is the package for the application of 95 E Hamilton Avenue. Please review the grading plans and provide redlined comments by December 20th Please contact Public Works immediately should you need additional information. Sincerely '-G.--- ibYliA'•j((11464ij ' .X, _ • 4_4c,_,:). J:\andDev\Plan Check Comments\t-Specific Projects-Active Project in Progress\Hamilton Ave E 95\Transmittal to Planning.docx Rev 11 11 of cA"`lot °� DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ROUTING SHEET (�k CH AR .C DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Distribution: September 17, 2015 November 19, 2015 September 19,2016 Presentation: November 19, 2015 Conditions/ Comments: December 3, 2015 ROUTE TO: c A.* ���, X Building Division Police Departmentp 44 4 19 X Fire Department Ni?) Economic Development°',ts•, 8/6 6,, X Land Development Engineer 00{lp X Traffic Engineer -a PROJECT DESCRIPTION: New 7,051 SF 2-story podium office building with additional 3,306 SF Basement and Elevator on vacant lot. Over 10,000 SF hardscape. Tree removal permit. Reference previous applications: PLN2010-62, PLN2009-06(expired) and BLD2009-00458 File No.: PLN2015-274 APNs: 279-27-096 Applicant: Saul Flores Property Owners: 95 Hamilton, LLC Project Addresses: 95 E. Hamilton Zoning District: Professional Office General Plan Designation: Professional Office PROJECT PLANNER: Cindy McCormick DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: If it can be determined that this project will require minimal or no comments by your department/agency, please return this comment sheet with your initials to the Project Planner as soon as possible. Status I n iti J&7/ Y Conditions No Conditions Additional information/revisions(see attached) MEMORANDUM CITY OF CAMPBELL TO: Cindy McCormick, Project Planner DATE: 09/26/2016 FROM: Doris Quai Hoi, Project Engineer SUBJECT: DRC APPLICATION Site Address: 95 E Hamilton Avenue(APN 279-27-096) For File No(s): PLN2015-274 Project Description: New 7,051 SF 2-story podium office building with additional 3,306 SF basement and elevator on a vacant lot that was previously merged under application PLN2010-62. Applicant: Saul Flores COMMENTS The scope of this project triggers the requirement for Boulevard Frontage Improvements as required by Campbell Municipal Code 11.24.040 The City of Campbell's adopted Streetscape Standards identify this portion of Hamilton Avenue as an Image Street with very specific frontage improvement requirements. This project triggers the requirement for the installation of the streetscape improvements. The applicant will be required to construct these improvements and have them completed prior to occupying the building. The Streetscape Standards can be viewed here: (http://www.cityofcampbell.com/DocumentCenter/View/168) On Tuesday September 27th, Public Works met with Ali Abiani, Civil Engineer on record, and discussed the relocation of the permeable pavers to be installed along the westerly surface parking areas to reduce the total amount of impervious area resulting in keeping below the size threshold for C.3 applicability and eliminate the need for storm water treatment measures. Visit the City's website and follow the submittal requirements for Public Works once this application has received entitlement. - The checklist for the various plans required for submittal can be found on the City's Website at City Services►Public Works Engineering Land Development►Documents, (or use this link: http://www.cityofcampbell.com/206/Documents). See instructions on: 1. Checklist for Grading and Drainage and 2. Checklist for Street Improvement Plans. The Building Permit will not be issued until all Public Works Conditions of Approval have been satisfied. These Conditions of Approval are a supplement to the plans by MFA Engineers & Associates. The plans are not approved for construction. Further plan checking by Public Works will be required post entitlement. J:\LandDev\ConditionsTing\Hamilton Ave E 95 dated 9-23-2016.docx Page 1 of 5 95 E Hamilton Avenue(PLN2015-274) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Response Letter: Upon submittal of the Street Improvement Plans and the Grading and Drainage Plans, the applicant shall provide an itemized response letter verifying that all the Public Works Conditions of Approval have been addressed. 2. Preliminary Title Report: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall provide a current (within the past 6 months)Preliminary Title Report. 3. Soils Report: Upon submittal of the Parcel/Final Map, applicant shall provide a soils report prepared by a registered geotechnical or civil engineer. 4. Grading and Drainage Plan: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall conduct hydrology studies based on a ten-year storm frequency, prepare an engineered grading and drainage plan, and pay fees required to obtain necessary grading permits. Prior to occupancy, the design engineer shall provide written certification that the development has been built per the engineered grading and drainage plans. In addition, a plan review letter Will be required of the Geotechnical engineer for the entire grading and drainage system which should include but is not limited to a review of the subsurface of the non-compacted biotreatment material that may have potential for subsurface failure and surface failure due to vehicle loads. 5. Storm Drain Area Fee: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall pay the required Storm Drain Area fee, currently set at $2,650.00 per net acre, which is $833.00. 6. Storm Water Information: On the grading plans show the amount, in square footage, of: a. Existing impervious area.(1,046 sf) b. Proposed impervious area.(9694 sf) c. Proposed pervious area. (4,826 sf) 7. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Measures: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements, Santa Clara.Valley Water District requirements, and the Campbell Municipal 'Code regarding stormwater pollution prevention. The primary objectives are to improve the quality and reduce the quantity of stormwater runoff to the bay. Resources to achieve these objectives include Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbook for New Development and Redevelopment ("CA BMP Handbook") by the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA), 2003; Start at the Source: A Design Guidance Manual for Stormwater Quality Protection ("Start at the Source")by the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA), 1999; and Using Site Design Techniques to Meet Development Standards for Stormwater Quality: A Companion Document to Start at the Source ("Using Site Design Techniques")by BASMAA, 2003. J:1LandDev\Conditions\Ping\Hamilton Ave E 95 dated 9-23-2016.docx Page 2 of 5 95 E Hamilton Avenue(PLN2015-274) Only approved open joint pavers or permeable pavers can be installed that are proposed for the parking lot and must meet the Site Design Measures for Small Projects as outlined on the attached cut sheets for pervious pavers. A maintenance agreement and plan will be required so that City staff can make yearly inspections. The City suggests that the permeable pavers be installed in the parking stalls rather than just being placed as shown on C-2 Rev 9-19-16. Minimum permeable paving area must be no less than 1,576 SF with the proposed landscaping at 3,250 SF. 8. Tree Removal(s): To accommodate the required street scape plan, the existing Crape Myrtle tree at 0+94 station identified on Sheet C-4, will be removed as part of this project. Three Evergreen Ash-Fraxinus Uhdei trees will be installed as part of the streetscape plan. 9. Utilities: All on-site utilities shall be installed underground per Section 21.18.140 of the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings or additions. Applicant shall comply with all plan submittals, permitting, and fee requirements of the serving utility companies. Utility locations shall not cause damage to any existing street trees. Where there are utility conflicts due to established tree roots or where a new tree will be installed, alternate locations for utilities shall be explored. Include utility trench details where necessary. 10. Water Meter(s) and. Sewer Cleanout(s): Existing and proposed water meter(s) and sewer ceanout(s) shall be relocated or installed on private property behind the public right-of-way line. Sheet C-2 shows the (N) SCO in the public right-of-way: Also on Sheet C-2 a water meter is shown to be on private property in the (N) driveway approach. Verify with SJW if this is an acceptable location. If not, the (N) water meter needs to,be relocated elsewhere on the property. 11. Utility Coordination Plan: Prior to issuance of building peiniits for the site, the applicant shall submit a utility coordination plan and schedule for approval by the City Engineer for installation and/or abandonment of all utilities. The plan shall clearly show the location and size of all existing utilities and the associated main lines; indicate which utilities and services are to remain; which utilities and services are to be abandoned, and where new utilities and services will be installed. Joint trenches for new utilities shall be used whenever possible. Sheet C-2 shows the replacement of a 4" lateral to a 6" lateral. Work directly with WVSD on details and design requirements. The Off-Site Civil plans will incorporate a dedicated sheet for WVSD design and details. Applicant will need to coordinate with WVSD during the plan check and review process. 12. Pavement Restoration: Based on the utility coordination plan, the applicant shall prepare a pavement restoration plan for approval by the City Engineer prior to any utility installation or abandonment. Streets that have been reconstructed or overlaid within the previous five years will require boring and jacking for all new utility installations. Hamilton Avenue has not been reconstructed or overlaid in the last 5 years. The pavement restoration plan shall indicate how the street pavement shall be restored following the installation or abandonment of all utilities necessary for the project. J:\LandDev\Conditions\PingU-lamilton Ave E 95 dated 9-23-2016.docx Page 3 of 5 , 95 E Hamilton Avenue(PLN2015-274) Pavement restoration work will extend to the south side of E Hamilton Avenue and incorporate both the water lateral and sanitary sewer lateral to create one large rectangular restoration area. There will need to be a review of the traffic control plan and how this work will be accomplished during normal business hours. 13. Street Improvement Agreements / Plans / Encroachment Permit / Fees / Deposits: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, applicant shall execute a street improvement agreement, cause plans for public street improvements to be prepared by a registered civil engineer, pay various fees and deposits, post security and provide insurance necessary to obtain an encroachment permit for construction of the standard public street improvements, as required by the City Engineer. The plans shall include the following, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer: a. Show location of all existing utilities within the new and existing public right-of-way. - b. Relocation of all existing utilities including utility boxes, covers, poles, etc. outside of sidewalk area. No utility boxes, covers, etc. will be allowed in the 7' sidewalk area. c. Removal of existing driveway approaches and necessary sidewalk, curb and gutter. d. Removal of existing curb and gutter, existing sidewalk, driveway approaches and par strip, and install new city streetscape standard. e. Installation of a minimum of three (3) City approved street trees Evergreen Ash — Fraxinus Uhdei and irrigation at 40 feet on center. One tree will be located west of the new driveway; two will be located east of the two driveways. (There is a requirement for a 10' landscaped buffer behind private property fronting Hamilton Avenue). Park strip ground cover shall be no mow (fine fescue and hair grass Deschampsia) turf with sub-surface drip irrigation such as Eco-Mats (or approved equal). f. This project is subject to the City's Streetscape Standards for Hamilton Avenue, which requires a 10 foot landscaped park strip with City approved street trees 40 feet on center, and a 7 foot sidewalk. g. Installation of asphalt concrete overlay per street pavement restoration plan for utility installation and/or abandonment, as required by the City Engineer. h. Installation of traffic control, stripes and signs. Should the any striping work be cut due to utility trench work, the applicant will be required to restripe the entire street frontage and not just the areas that need replaced. i. Construction of confotuis to existing public and private improvements, as necessary. The sidewalks will need to confotttt at each end at a 90 degree angle with at least a minimum of 4' wide sidewalk to connect to the existing sidewalks. This will be finalized in the plan check review process. j. All existing utility boxes and its covers, that will remain in the park strip will require readjustments and must be level to the sidewalk, or as required by the City Engineer. k. Submit final plans in a digital format acceptable to the City. 14. Street Improvements Completed for Occupancy and Building Permit Final: Prior to allowing occupancy and/or final building peiinit signoff for any and/or all buildings, the applicant J:UandDev\Conditions\PIng\Hamilton Ave E 95 dated 9-23-2016.docx Page 4 of 5 f, 95 E Hami '&, Avenue(PLN2015-274) shall have the required street improvements and pavement restoration installed and accepted by the City, and the design engineer shall submit as-built drawings to the City. 15. Maintenance of Landscaping: Owner(s), current and future, are required to maintain the landscaped park strip and tree wells in the public right of way. This includes, but is not limited to: trees, lawn, plantings, irrigation, etc. Trees shall not be pruned in a manner that would not allow the tree to grow to a mature height. 16. Utility Encroachment Permit: Separate encroachment permits for the installation of utilities to serve the development will be required (including water, sewer, gas, electric, etc.). Applicant shall apply for and pay all necessary fees for utility permits for sanitary sewer, gas, water, electric and all other utility work. 17. Additional Street Improvements: Should it be discovered after the approval process that new utility main lines, extra utility work or other work is required to service the development, and should those facilities or other work affect any public improvements, the City may add conditions to the development/project/permit, at the discretion of the City Engineer, to restore pavement or other public improvements to the satisfaction of the City. 18. Trash Enclosure Requirements: 1. NPDES Permit No. CAS612008 (CRWQCB): C.3.a.i. (7): For all new development and redevelopment projects that are subject to the Permittee's planning,building, development, or other comparable review,but not regulated by Provision C.3, encourage the inclusion of adequate source control measures to limit pollutant generation, discharge, and runoff. These source control measures should include: o Covered trash, food waste, and compactor enclosures. 2. Campbell Municipal Code 14.02.030 "Stormwater Pollution Control/ Requirements". The code states that no pollutants or water containing pollutants can be discharged into the City's storm drain system. Trash enclosures contain pollutants. During a rain event(or during general cleaning) water washes over and into roofless enclosures, collecting pollutants and discharging to the City's stoiui drain system. Applicants are required to show how new trash enclosures will not discharge pollutants into the storm drain system. One possible method is to provide a sanitary drain in the trash enclosure. 3. West Valley Sanitation District (WVSD) the local sanitary sewer agency's authority and standards: If a sanitary connection will be installed,WVSD requires a roof on the enclosure. J:\LandDev\Conditions\ 1ng\Hamilton Ave E 95 dated 9-23-2016.docx Page 5 of 5 MEMORANDUM CITY OF CAMPBELL TO: Cindy McCormick, Project Planner DATE: 09/26/2016 FROM: Doris Quai Hoi, Project Engineer SUBJECT: DRC APPLICATION Site Address: 95 E Hamilton Avenue(APN 279-27-096) For File No(s): PLN2015-274 Project Description: New 7,051 SF 2-story podium office building with additional 3,306 SF basement and elevator on a vacant lot.that was previously merged under application PLN2010-62. Applicant:. Saul Flores COMMENTS The scope of this project triggers the requirement for Boulevard Frontage Improvements as required by Campbell Municipal Code 11.24.040 The City of Campbell's adopted.Streetscape Standards identify_this portion of Hamilton Avenue as an Image Street with very specific frontage improvement requirements. This project triggers the requirement for the installation of the streetscape improvements. The applicant will be required to construct these improvements and have them completed prior to occupying the building. The Streetscape Standards can be viewed here: (http://www.cityofcampbell.com/DocumentCenterNiew/168) On Tuesday September 27th, Public Works met with Ali Abiani, Civil Engineer on record, and discussed the relocation of the permeable pavers to be installed along the westerly surface parking areas to reduce the total amount of impervious area resulting in keeping below the size threshold for C.3 applicability and eliminate the need for storm water treatment measures. Visit the City's website and follow the submittal requirements for Public Works once this application has received entitlement. The checklist for the various plans required for submittal can be found on the City's Website at City Services Public Works Engineering►Land Development Documents, (or use this link: http://www.cityofcampbell.com/206/Documents). See instructions on: 1. Checklist for Grading and Drainage and 2. Checklist for Street Improvement Plans. The Building Permit will not be issued until all Public Works Conditions of Approval have been satisfied. These Conditions of Approval are a supplement to the plans by MFA Engineers & Associates. The plans are not approved for construction. Further plan checking by Public Works will be required post entitlement. J:\LandDev\Conditions\Ping\Hamilton Ave E 95 dated 9-23-2016.docx Page 1 of 5 95 E Hamilton Avenue(PLN2015-274) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Response Letter: Upon submittal of the Street Improvement Plans and the Grading and Drainage Plans, the applicant shall provide an itemized response letter verifying that all the Public Works Conditions of Approval have been addressed. 2. Preliminary Title Report: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall provide a current(within the past 6 months) Preliminary Title Report. 3. Soils Report: Upon submittal of the Parcel/Final Map, applicant shall provide a soils report prepared by a registered geotechnical or civil engineer. 4. Grading and Drainage Plan: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall conduct hydrology studies based on a ten-year storm frequency, prepare an engineered grading and drainage plan, and pay fees required to obtain necessary grading permits. Prior to occupancy, the design engineer shall provide written certification that the development has been built per the engineered grading and drainage plans. In addition, a plan review letter will be required of the Geotechnical engineer for the entire grading and drainage system which should include but is not limited to a review of the subsurface of the non-compacted biotreatment material that may have potential for subsurface failure and surface failure due to vehicle loads. 5. Storm Drain Area Fee: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the • applicant shall pay the required Storm Drain Area fee, currently set at $2,650.00 per net acre, which is $833.00. 6. Storm Water Information: On the grading plans show the amount, in square footage, of: a. Existing impervious area. (1,046 sf) b. Proposed impervious area. (9694 sf) c. Proposed pervious area. (4,826 sf) 7. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Measures: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements, Santa Clara Valley Water District requirements, and the Campbell Municipal Code regarding stormwater pollution prevention. The primary objectives are to improve the quality and reduce the quantity of stormwater runoff to the bay. Resources to achieve these objectives include Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbook for New Development and Redevelopment ("CA BMP Handbook") by the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA), 2003; Start at the Source: A Design Guidance Manual for Stormwater Quality Protection ("Start at the Source") by the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA), 1999; and Using Site Design Techniques to Meet Development Standards for Stormwater Quality: A Companion Document to Start at the Source ("Using Site Design Techniques")by BASMAA, 2003. J:\LandDev\Conditions\Ping\Hamilton Ave E 95 dated 9-23-2016.docx Page 2 of 5 95 E Hamilton Avenue (PLN2015-274) Only approved open joint pavers or permeable pavers can be installed that are proposed for the parking lot and must meet the Site Design Measures for Small Projects as outlined on the attached cut sheets for pervious pavers. A maintenance agreement and plan will be required so that City staff can make yearly inspections. The City suggests that the permeable pavers be installed in the parking stalls rather than just being placed as shown on C-2 Rev 9-19-16. Minimum permeable paving area must be no less than 1,576 SF with the proposed landscaping at 3,250 SF. 8. Tree Removal(s): To accommodate the required street scape plan, the existing Crape Myrtle tree at 0+94 station identified on Sheet C-4, will be removed as part of this project. Three. Evergreen Ash—Fraxinus Uhdei trees will be installed as part of the streetscape plan. 9. Utilities: All on-site utilities shall be installed underground per Section 21.18.140 of the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings or additions. Applicant shall comply with all plan submittals, permitting, and fee requirements of the serving utility companies.' Utility locations shall not cause damage to any existing street trees. Where there are utility conflicts due to established tree roots or where a new tree will be installed, alternate locations for utilities shall be explored. Include utility trench details where necessary. 10. Water Meter(s) and Sewer Cleanout(s): Existing and proposed water meter(s) and sewer cleanout(s) shall be relocated or installed on private property behind the public right-of-way line. Sheet C-2 shows the (N) SCO in the public right-of-way. Also on Sheet C-2 a water meter is shown to be on private property in the (N) driveway approach. Verify with SJW if this is an acceptable location. If not, the (N) water meter needs to be relocated elsewhere on the property. 11. Utility Coordination Plan: Prior to issuance of building permits for the site, the applicant shall submit a utility coordination plan and schedule for approval by the City Engineer for installation and/or abandonment of all utilities. The plan shall clearly show the location and size of all existing utilities and the associated main lines; indicate which utilities and services are to remain; which utilities and services are to be abandoned, and where new utilities and services will be installed. Joint trenches for new utilities shall be used whenever possible. Sheet C-2 shows the replacement of a 4" lateral to a 6" lateral. Work directly with WVSD on details and design requirements. The Off-Site Civil plans will incorporate a dedicated sheet for WVSD design and details. Applicant will need to coordinate with WVSD during the plan check and review process. 12. Pavement Restoration: Based on the utility coordination plan, the applicant shall prepare a pavement restoration plan for approval by the City Engineer prior to any utility installation or abandonment. Streets that have been reconstructed or overlaid within the previous five years will require boring and jacking for all new utility installations. Hamilton Avenue has not been reconstructed or overlaid in the last 5 years. The pavement restoration plan shall indicate how the street pavement shall be restored following the installation or abandonment of all utilities necessary for the project. J:\LandDev\Conditions\Ping\Hainilton Ave E 95 dated 9-23-2016.docx Page 3 of 5 95 E Hamilton Avenue (PLN2015-274) Pavement restoration work will extend to the south side of E Hamilton Avenue and incorporate both the water lateral and sanitary sewer lateral to create one large rectangular. restoration area. There will need to be a review of the traffic control plan and how this work will be accomplished during normal business hours. 13. Street Improvement Agreements / Plans / Encroachment Permit / Fees / Deposits: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, applicant shall execute a street improvement agreement, cause plans for public street improvements to,be prepared by a registered civil engineer, pay various fees and deposits, post security and provide insurance necessary to obtain an encroachment peilnit for construction of the standard public street improvements, as required by the City Engineer. The plans shall include the following, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer: a. Show location of all existing utilities within the new and existing public right-of-way. b. Relocation of all existing utilities including utility boxes, covers,poles, etc. outside of sidewalk area. No utility boxes, covers, etc. will be allowed in the 7' sidewalk area. c. Removal of existing driveway approaches and necessary sidewalk, curb and gutter. d. Removal of existing curb and gutter, existing sidewalk, driveway approaches and par strip, and install new city streetscape standard. e. Installation of a minimum of three (3) City approved street trees Evergreen Ash — Fraxinus Uhdei and irrigation at 40 feet on center. One tree will be located west of the new driveway; two will be located east of the two driveways. (There is a requirement for a 10' landscaped buffer behind private property fronting Hamilton Avenue). Park strip ground cover shall be no mow (fine fescue and hair grass Deschampsia) turf with sub-surface drip irrigation such as Eco-Mats (or approved equal). f. This project is subject to the City's Streetscape Standards for Hamilton Avenue, which requires a 10 foot landscaped park strip with City approved street trees 40 feet on center, and a 7 foot sidewalk. g. Installation of asphalt concrete overlay per street pavement restoration plan for utility installation and/or abandonment, as required by the City Engineer. h. Installation of traffic control, stripes and signs. Should the any striping work be cut due to utility trench work, the applicant will be required to restripe the entire street frontage and not just the areas that need replaced. i. Construction of confoinis to existing public and private improvements, as necessary. The sidewalks will need to conform at each end at a 90 degree angle with at least a minimum of 4' wide sidewalk to connect to the existing sidewalks. This will be finalized in the plan check review process. j. All existing utility boxes and its covers, that will remain in the park strip will require readjustments and must be level to the sidewalk, or as required'by the City Engineer. k. Submit final plans in a digital format acceptable to the City. 14. Street Improvements Completed for Occupancy and Building Peiiiiit Final: Prior to allowing occupancy and/or final building permit signoff for any and/or all buildings, the applicant J:\LandDev\Conditions\Ping\Hamilton Ave E 95 dated 9-23-2016.docx Page 4 of 5 95 E Hamilton Avenue(PLN2015-274) shall have the required street improvements and pavement restoration installed and accepted by the City, and the design engineer shall submit as-built drawings to the City. 15. Maintenance of Landscaping_ Owner(s), current and future, are required to maintain the landscaped park strip and tree wells in the public right of way. This includes, but is not limited to: trees, lawn, plantings, irrigation, etc. Trees shall not be pruned in a manner that would not allow the tree to grow to a mature height. 16. Utility Encroachment Permit: Separate encroachment permits for the installation of utilities to serve the development will be required (including water, sewer, gas, electric, etc.). Applicant shall apply for and pay all necessary fees for utility permits for sanitary sewer, gas, water, electric and all other utility work. 17. Additional Street Improvements: Should it be discovered after the approval process that new utility main lines, extra utility work or other work is required to service the development, and should those facilities or other work affect any public improvements, the City may add conditions to the development/project/permit, at the discretion of the City Engineer, to restore pavement or other public improvements to the satisfaction of the City. 18. Trash Enclosure Requirements: 1. .NPDES Permit No. CAS612008 (CRWQCB): C.3.a.i. (7): For all new development and redevelopment projects that are subject to the Permittee's planning,building, development, or other comparable review,but not regulated by Provision C.3, encourage the inclusion of adequate source control measures to limit pollutant generation, discharge, and runoff. These source control measures should include: o Covered trash, food waste, and compactor enclosures. 2. Campbell Municipal Code 14.02.030 "Stormwater Pollution Control/ Requirements". The code states that no pollutants or water containing pollutants can be discharged into the City's storm drain system. Trash enclosures contain pollutants. During a rain event(or during general cleaning)water washes over and into roofless enclosures, collecting pollutants and discharging to the City's storm drain system. Applicants are required to show how new trash enclosures will not discharge pollutants into the storm drain system. One possible method is to provide a sanitary drain in the trash enclosure. 3. West Valley Sanitation District(WVSD)the local sanitary sewer agency's authority and standards: If a sanitary connection will be installed, WVSD requires a roof on the enclosure. J:\LandDev\Conditions\Ping\Hamilton Ave E 95 dated 9-23-2016.docx Page 5 of 5 OFFICE O F COUNTY ASSESSOR SANTA CLARA COUNTY , CALIFORNIA BOOK PAGE 279 27 i 2aI 2s o _0 to — / N a - a — DE TRACEY - - ---- - -- - -- -- -- STREET -o i 18338 o n I M 145.5 /459 /463 /46'7 TRACT N— 1799 1479 148,3 /487 149/ /495 M c73— 104.Ir 1 • _ / 0 __.•_____•••--I 41.61 I +7.85 j 5785 I 57.85 57.85 j 62 1 60 ' 62 57.85 57.85 i 57.85 57.85 39.65 I 183.01 a I I 1 I I r N. 0 0 58 22 ID. I I I 1 _ Z oc, 8 w 9 a,i /O NI // r- /2 rl J. ,D.: /4 ul /5 /6 n /7 �; /8 . /9 a 20 w 98.60 IPCL 39 P. M. 338-M-30 30 btIm w `o uo 60' I ' I I 1 1 —I QI M d 57 23N. i Q I— b b. i W 36 35 34 i 33 I 32 1 31 30 op 29 j 28 27 26 j 25 24 a N ; j W 62 ' —I--11 ___1 40.15 17.70 ..---1—•.. ...--1--...�L_... I ...___L__... ...__!......62..99 N �. .... N 97.01 !83.01 7 160 — 234.67 236.60 141.40 o 141.01 13901 q :M co. AI (I) Ij n 7 I I 2 •� 15 ?/ 56 16 � 33 59 "� 0.936 AC. NET 0.957 AC. NET 141.39 W 141 I --——— ----------- —�— -- Z 132 h H `° 35 34 a• 14 22 to N J �", 55 17 I- _ b tr• M --- 6 oiF— ---- ------ - - 96 0 a G N I 13 23 b m 14,520 sf L.L.A. 20274210 o — oo o0 54 18 a _-_____ 167.49 170.17 132 ir ESTHER -- - \ss 1 eye - -- - - -- - --I ... AVENUE 26 N • H \s \�\ 35 3g h ' • I2 24 Op 53 19 30 �2 0.995 AC. NET 5 307 1.60 AC. NET o -- 5 - 30 1 I1 in rc) n E 0; c0 o I I 25 b M N 52 20 1 29 63 N m I N N m J o n - -- Q `� o ------- -,0, - --- -- 37 o ro 4 36 33 3 a > r� : D N — ^ o Z � M N. I 26 n � of o1 5/ 2I 28 64 a �0 0 IYz DETAIL SCALE I =30' 4 - - 39 - �0� PV U _-__'- ---" -} y - - 9.31 9.62 9.62 9.62 9.62 9.62 14.31 • 0 C �� 9 27 n h u.) 50 22 � 27 46 � h �8 9 10 II 12 13 27 IZI 1 6 0 �� '�_ __ _ _ - F 2 21 22 23 24 25 26 - a� -- - - - V --- - t41 43' o" -Z 139 Q i —CI v B a_ !36.63 270.9449 8 28 3 a — 23 26 N M 7 6 5 4 3 2 o '� 134.82 Q . 274.42 _• o 3 PTN. LOT 2 141 39 ? PT N. LOT I r41 Z to X2O IS 18 17 16 15 14 in I __ — ------ . ----- -- ------ `' 1.04 AC. NET Q �. 47 I- 1 A :' F., IX a b -- J �'� 7 29 n M W to 24 25 CONDOMINIUM PLAN _ 166.54 _ 91.54 75 m ,� Q N -- -T- -+ - 123 (139) _ Q TRACT N°7508 i t • m 0 T-ri &:: s 141.4 O 4 I 3 i 2 I = - -I " 0.35 AC. I ,� b NI 2 in / 0 /O� • 3I OWNERS REQUEST'', 1 W m N W 30' M b — " ! la I 2000—01 O NO N CO 6O, m _ 65 45' I ,+ a := 94 4 ! SEE DEIL �a O 74.91 75 !15.08 o J 203.46 50 74 60' e 1 1 .0 1462 /5/O /482 /538 LITA 21.58 \ 55.96 2 66 i 7;9.29 bh `� P. G. KEITH'S SUBD. N2 2 /550 ���ccc /580 /60o J to• n TRACT NE 7508 -o----- ti- S. WINCHESTER Q -- ( F MLY. S. C o L- G. ROAD ) --- — — a - — BOULEVARD - 't _ WINCHESTER rRA oEa 106 G r �r,W EXECUTIVE OFFICE > a w BK CONDOMINIUMS LAWRENCE E. STONE - ASSESSOR J-,a Q'� 305 Cadastral mop for assessment purposes only. a p ala Compiled under R. & T. Code, Sec. 327. 210 Effective Roll Year 2017-2018 U ti) ak(er- yez.„,„„ C.3 Stormwater Handbook Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program Attachment IV-1 Sizing for Volume-Based Treatment Controls Section B—'Sizing Volume-Based Treatment Controls based on the Adapted California Stormwater BMP Handbook Approach The equation that will be used to size the BMP is: BMP Volume = (Correction Factor) X (Unit Storage) X (Drainage Area to the BMP) Step 1. Determine the drainage area for the BMP,A=I, °acres' Step 2.Determine percent imperviousness of the drainage area: a. Estimate the amount of impervious surface(rooftops,hardscape,streets,and sidewalks,etc.)in the area draining to the BMP:6283 acres b. %impervious area=(amount of impervious area/drainage area for the BMP)*100 %impervious area=(Step 2a./Step 1)*100 %impervious area=r.'£ 1F1% Step 3. Determine from Figure 1 the mean annual precipitation(MAPsite)at the project site location: (see Section II.Step 4 for more explanation.) �g MAPsite= .../ ' inches! Step 4 Identify the reference rain gage closest to the project site from the following list and record the MAPgage: MAPgage=I , `inches Reference Rain Mean Annual Gages Precipitation(MAPgage) (in) - - - San Jose Airport 13.9 Palo Alto 13.7 Gilroy 18.2 Morgan Hill 19.5 IV.Treatment Control Sizing Criteria Attachment IV-1—Page 1 FINAL J:u,oancv Forms\csmtvonum.,wreuoc May 20,2004 Santa Clara Valley C.3 Stormwater Handbook Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program Attachment IV-1 Sizing for Volume-Based Treatment Controls Section B—Adapted California Stormwater BMP Handbook Approach (continued) Step 5 Determine the rain gage correction factor for the precipitation at the site using the information from Step 3 and Step 4. S I1.3 Correction Factor=MAPs;te(Step 3)/MAPgage(Step 4) Correction Factor= e' ? . Step 6. Identify representative soil type for the BMP drainage area. a) Identify from Figure 1,the soil type that is representative of the pervious portion of the project shown here in order of increasing infiltration capability: Clay Sandy Clay Clay Loam /Silt Loam Loam b) Does the site planning allow for protection of natural areas and associated vegetation and soils so that the soils outside the building footprint are not graded/compacted? If your answer is no,and the soil will be compacted during site preparation and grading,the soil's infiltration ability will be decreased.Modify your answer to a soil with a lower infiltration rate(e.g.,Silt Loam to Clay Loam or Clay). Modified soil type: I GLa y iamb 7. Determine the average slope for the drainage area for the BMP: /. (% 8. Determine the unit basin storage volume from sizing curves. a) Slope≤ 1% Use the figure entitled"Unit Basin Volume for 80%Capture, 1% Slope"corresponding to the nearest rain gage:Figure 2-A,B,C,or D for San Jose,Palo Alto,Gilroy and Morgan Hill, respectively.Find the percent imperviousness of the drainage area(see answer to Step 2, above)on the x-axis.From there,find the line corresponding to the soil type(from Step 6),and obtain the unit basin storage on the y-axis. Unit Basin Storage for 1%slope(UBS 1%e) : :0 4. .,' (inches) b) Slope≥ 15% Use the figure entitled"Unit Basin Volume for 80%Capture, 15%Slope"corresponding to the nearest rain gage:Figure 3-A,B,C,or D for San Jose,Palo Alto,Gilroy and Morgan Hill,respectively.Find the percent imperviousness of the drainage area(see IV.Treatment Control Sizing Criteria Attachment IV-1—Page 2 FINAL Mandl).FormsIG&D\Volume workshcadue May 20,2004 Santa Clara Valley C.3 Stormwater Handbook Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program answer to Step 2,above)on the x-axis.From there,find the line corresponding to the soil type(from Step 6),and obtain the unit basin storage on the y-axis. Unit Basin Storage for 15%slope(UBS 15%) (inches) Attachment IV-1 Sizing for Volume-Based Treatment Controls Section B—Adapted California Stormwater BMP Handbook Approach (continued) c) Slope> 1%and< 15% Find the unit basin volumes for 1%and 15%using the techniques in Steps 8a and 8b and interpolate by applying a slope correction factor per the following formula: UBSX =UBSI%+(UBS15%o-UBSI%)*(x%-1%)/(15%-1%) = (Step 8a)+(Step Sb-Step 8a)* (x%-1%)/(15%-1%) Where UBSX-Unit Basin Storage volume for drainage area of intermediate slope,x% Unit Basin Storage volume(USB X) (inches)! (corrected for slope of site) 9. Size the BMP,using the following equation: BMP Volume=Rain Gage Correction Factor*Unit Basin Storage Volume*Drainage Area BMP Volume=(Step 5)*(Step 8 unit storage)* (Step 1 Drainage area) * 1 foot/12 in. BMP Volume= :acre-feet) AcreO re Vz, oV.c� N.Treatment Control Sizing Criteria Attachment N-1—Page 3 FINAL J:11andDev1Fon G&n\vdume worksne,Ldoe May 20,2004 MEMORANDUM CITY OF CAMPBELL TO: Cindy McCormick,Project Planner DATE: 12/4/15 FROM: Doris ()uai Hoi,Project Engineer SUBJECT: DRC APPLICATION Site Address: 95 E.Hamilton Avenue For File No(s): PLN2015-274 Project Description: New Commercial office building;7051 SF two-story building wl 3,306 SF basement and elevator; and a tree removal permit. This project is subject to C.3 requirements however should the developer use Applicant; Saul Flores COMMENTS The scope of this project triggers the requirement for Frontage Improvements as required by Campbell Municipal Code 11.24.040. The City of Campbell's adopted Streetscape Standards identifying Hamilton Avenue as an Image Street with very specific frontage improvement requirements as shown on page 9 of the document. The applicant will be required to construct these improvements and have them completed prior to occupying the building. The Streetscape Standards can be viewed here: (http://www.eityofcampbell.com/DocumentCenterNiew/168) Additional links: 1. http://www.cityofcampbell .com/20S/Documents (Land Developement City Standard Details and Specifications, Templates, Forms etc) 2. http://www.cityofcampbell .com/268/Runoff-Program (C.3 Data Form Work Sheets) 3. http://www.scvurppp-w2k.com/c3_handbook_2012.shtml (ForC3 Requirements,refer to the C.3 Stormwater Handbook,April 2012. This can be found on • SCURVPPP's website,) These Completeness Comments are a supplement to "The Eagle Building" dated September 11, 2015 by Mena Architects. The plans are not approved. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMPLETENESS COMMENTS 1. For space management purposes, on the preliminary utility/on-site plans; show any major utility systems such as transformer,irrigation systems,haekflow preventers, etc that will be located on private property. ; , 2. The City does not allow connection of private storm drain laterals to connect directly behind a storm drain inlet nor does the City anew through curb drains daylighting into the gutter pan. The proposed stoini should tie to the existing storm main on Hamilton Avenue with a new manhole. Profiles of the new and existing storm mains and manholes should be JAI and Dcv CompletencseSp :ific Projects'HamiJtan Ave E 95.docx Page 1 of 2 1. , I 95 E.Hamilton Ave(PLN2015-274) engineered and provided including calculations that the proposed and existing storm system can handle the storm flows from a 10-year storm event and that the pre Q and post Q are equal (TO BE SUBMITTED). Or provide alternate methods to retain on site. Se" , C— :: fit 3. The applicant may be able to reduce th'e-ainomit of impervious sufface below the threshold for C.3 applicability and eliminate the need for stormwater treatment measures. This can be done by increasing self-retaining areas, convert impervious to pervious such as using pervious pavers, pervious concrete, pervious asphalt, interlocking concrete pavers or grid pavements when designed to store and infiltrate the rainfall runoff volume. Green roofs are another site design measure. ,� r i f4`S . . .: 4. Submit calculations that are consistent with the submitted preliminary grading plans that show the proposed project will meet storm. water requirements pertaining to the City's NPDES permit C.3 provisions (flow based or volume based on-site design measures). The proposed plan should show storm water on-site treatment elements The C.3 provision requires that approximately 80% of the on-site stool' water drainage is treated. (The allowed treatment measures will include: reuse, infiltration, evapotranspiration and biotreatment.) Onc ore information is provided further completeness comments could be added ._ ''.Y.' t.sP t Entitlenien during plan check: (FYI)There should be one or more sheets designated for ``d c-eiv'�storm water management plan. These sheets will be used/for reference for the life of the proJeet-fo afntenapce purposes and annual inspections. 6. Post Entitlerrm during plan.the r-g ..L)-please note.that all C.3 Landscaping scope of ( , `work-slratl. e part of the civil,stor`'mwater management plan sheets. Areas that are designated as bioretention areas shall have plant species sereectcd that are suitable for the location. See planting guidance of the SCV(JRVPPP C.3 Handbook in Appendix D-"Plant List and Planting Guidance for Landscape-Based Stonnwater Measures". 7. Storm Water Infoiuiation: On the grading/utility plans show the amount, in square footage, of k r:, e a.. Existing impervious area 1 l ( "t b. Proposed impervious area .5g, -;9.4, ..(4- T "__ e Proposed pervious area fi ; , 8. .Plan Lines:- The Public Works Department-has-updated the Q tc:and-Off Site,_templates. Visit the City website at: http:/huww.cityofcaInpbell.com/206/Documents. Note the:.City of Campbell has its own details y a. Civil Sheet C-6 —Use City of Campbell Details (not San Jose or Mountain View) — City of Campbell does not allow thru-curb drains. b. Visit the City's website for updated City Standard Updated details; details shown are outdated. JA.andL v\Completeness\Specific proici L5\Hamftpn Avc E 95.docx Page 2 of 2 VW/ Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program PROVISION C.3 DATA FORM Which Projects Must Comply with Stormwater Requirements? All projects that create and/or replace 10,000 sq.ft. or more of impervious surface on the project site must fill out this worksheet and submit it with the development project application. All restaurants,auto service facilities, retail gasoline outlets,and uncovered parking lot projects (stand-alone or part of another development project, including the top uncovered portion of parking structures)that create and/or replace 5,000 sq.ft. or more of impervious surface on the project site must also (ill out this worksheet. Interior remodeling projects,routine maintenance or repair projects such as re-roofing and re-paving, and single family homes that are not part of a larger plan of development are NOT required to complete this worksheet. What is an Impervious Surface? An impervious surface is a surface covering or pavement that prevents the land's natural ability to absorb and infiltrate rainfall/stormwater. Impervious surfaces include, but are not limited to rooftops, walkways,paved patios, driveways,parking lots, storage areas,impervious concrete and asphalt, and any other continuous watertight pavement or covering. Pervious pavement, underlain with pervious soil or pervious storage material (e.g., drain rock), that infiltrates rainfall at a rate equal to or greater than surrounding unpaved areas OR that stores and infiltrates the water quality design volume specified in Provision C.3.d of the Municipal Regional.Stormwater Permit(MRP), is not considered an impervious surface. For More Information For more information regarding selection of Best Management Practices for stormwater pollution prevention or stormwater treatment contact: 1. Project Information Project Name: E oA (f- g L,c t. ;:d'I ll. r,, APN# Project Address:9_5--( ©9 •: o flt (/, iFJP7 Cross Streets: S f,(:),1 f � Applicant/Developer Name: ` 5 Heff 0/( I-evn Project Phase(s): of En 'neer: A L ig h'q n i Project Type (Check all that apply): New Development 0 Redevelopment O Residential 1_q'Commercial 0 Industrial 0 Mixed Use 0 Public 0 institutional ❑ Restaurant O Uncovered Parking O Retail Gas Outlet 0 Auto Service (SIC code) O Other (5013-5014,5541,7532-7534,7536-7539) Project Description: CL) - Project Watershed/Receiving Water(creek, river or bay): /Utz, SCVURPPP C.3.Data Porn Page 1 of 4 November 2011 gt.tw, Ac, t__ _if) winA 0.1r-PY `kltW 517c. - r1 _- a. 2. Project Size a.Total i : b.Total Site Area Disturbed: O.33 acre acre (including clearing,grading,or excavating) Proposed Area(ftz) /'total Post-Project .- Existing Area(fly) Replaced I New / Area(ft--) r' Impervious Area _ t� _ 1_ Roof Parking tin co ver,ee1_ I. 2.. Sidewalks and Streets 4046 /0 LE 1 ,5 _ c.Total Impervious Area I d t!6 i o L od 648 d.Total new and replaced impervious area . ' _ • Pervious Area Landscaping^ $a 250 1ervious Paving __if [o t Other(e.g. Green Roof) c.Total Pervious Area # P� , g .g f. Percent Replacement of Impervious Area in Redevelopment Projects (Replaced Total Impervious Area Existing Total.Impervious Area) x 100% = % 3. State Construction General Permit Applicability: i71 i //©X / `_ 7-70,5 - 5/be6v k a. Is#2.b. equal to 1 acre or more? ) /7OX`'O d ._-_ /`�O O& �/.k) O Yes, applicant must. obtain coverage under the-Slate Construction General Permit (i.e., file a Notice of Intent and prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan) (see �ww.swrcb.ca.gov/water issues/pro -ams/stormwater/construction.shtml for details). C No, applicant does not need coverage under the State Construction General Permit. 4. MRP Provision C.3 Applicability: ,:e.eff pteamc, a. Is#2.d. equal to 10,000 sq. ft. or more, or 5,000 sq. ft. or more for restaurants, auto service facilities, retail gas outlets, and uncovered parking? (*Note that for public projects, the 5,000 sq.ft. threshold does not take effect until 12/1/12.) ❑ YY , C.3. source control, site design and treatment requirements apply Ltd No, C.3. source control and site design requirements may apply—check with local agency s PPY g Y b. Is#2.f. equal.to 50%or more? (\f ❑ Yes, C.3. requirements (site design and source control, as appropriate, and stormwater treatment) apply to entire site O No, C.3. requirements only apply to impervious area created and/or replaced i 5. Hydromoditication Management(IM) Applicability: I1 a. Does project create and/or replace one acre or more of impervious surface AND is the total ) post-project impervious area greater than the pre-project (existing) impervious area? ❑ Yes (continue) Q--No—exempt from HM, go to page 3 b. Is the project located in an area of HM applicability(green area) on the HM Applicability Map?( www.scvurppp-w2k.com/hmp inaps.htm ) ❑ -es, project must implement HM requirements No, project is exempt from HM requirements SCVURPPP C.3.Data Form Page 2 of 4 November 2011 6. Selection of Specific Stormwater Control Measures: Sitepesien Measures Source Control Measures Treatment Systems W(Minimize land disturbed ❑ Alternative building D None (all impervious surface ` materials drains to self-retaining areas) inimize impervious surfaces CI Wash area/racks, drain to LID Treatment sanitary sewer` El Rainwater harvest and CCrMinimum impact street or parking lot design LCovered dumpster area, use(e.g.,cistern or rain barrel ` ized for C.3.d treatment) drain to sanitary sewer' ❑ Cluster structures/ C'l" Infiltration basin pavement Li Sanitary sewer ® Disconnected downspouts connection or accessible D Infiltration trench cleanout for swimming [i Exfiltration trench Cad'Pervious pavement rpr.-«i' pool/spa/fountain'` U Green roof El Beneficial landscaping ® Underground detention (minimize irrigation,runoff, and infiltration system DiMicrodetention in (e.g.pervious pavement drain pesticides and fertilizers; landscape promotes treatment) rock, large diameter conduit) 3 DIOther self-treating area CIOutdoor material storage Biotreatment ❑ Self-retaining area protection ❑ Bioretention area El Rainwater harvesting and ❑ Covers, drains for loading ® Flow-through planter use (e.g.,rain barrel,cistern docks. maintenance bays, ❑ Tree box with connected to roof drains)1 fueling areas Bioretention soils U Preserved open space: ® Maintenance(pavement ❑ Other ac. or sq. ft sweeping,catch basin (circle one) cleaning,good housekeeping) D Protected riparian and ❑ Storm drain labeling Other Treatment Methods wetland areas/buffers ❑ Proprietary tree box filter' (Setback from top of bank: Li Other ft.) ❑ Media filter(sand,compost, ❑ Other or proprietary media)4 © Vegetated filter strips L Dry detention basins ® Other Flo Duration Controls for llIvdromodifieation Management(HM) Detention basin © Underground U Bioretention with outlet © Other tank or vault control Optional site design measure;does not have to be sized to comply with.Provision C.3.d treatment requirements. 2 Subject to sanitary sewer authority requirements. 3 Biotreatment measures are allowed only with completed feasibility analysis showing that infiltration and rainwater harvest and use are infeasible. 4 These treatment measures are only allowed if the project qualifies as a"Special Project". 5 These treatment measures are only allowed as part of a multi-step treatment process. SCVURPPP C.3.Data Form Page 3 of 4 November 2011 7. Treatment System Sizing for Projects with Treatment Requirements Indicate the hydraulic sizing criteria used and provide the calculated design flow or volume: Treatment System Component Hydraulic Sizing Design Flow or Criteria Used3 Volume (cfs or cu.ft.) See- G� il�'[ �1. l -l. S 3Key: la: Volume—WEF Method lb: Volume—CASQA BMP Handbook Method 2a: Flow—Factored Flood Flow Method 2b: Flow—CASQA BMP Handbook Method 2c: Flow—Uniform Intensity Method 3: Combination Flow and Volume Design Basis S. Alternative Certification: Was the treatment system sizing and design reviewed by a qualified third- party professional that is not a member of the project team or agency staff? ❑ Yes ❑ No Name of Reviewer 9. Operation &Maintenance Information A. Property Owner's Name a 5— 144, ii ! Cli L B. Responsible Party for Stormwater Treatment/Hydromodification Control O&M: a. Name: \11. 1) 1 b. Address: 1r c• 4-71. air..`. 4P 4li.de:: (7: - n 7 )a i - c. Phone/E-mail: /1 r" , r"`r,z-"1 ., r." r l / This section to be completed by Municipal staff O&M Responsibility Mechanism Indicate how responsibility for O&M is assured. Check all that apply: ❑ O&M Agreement ❑ Other mechanism that assigns responsibility(describe below): Reviewed: Community Development Department Public Works Department Planning Division: Engineering: Building Division: Other(Specify): Return form to: Data entry performed by: SCVURPPP C.3.Data Form Page 4 of 4 November 2011 infiltration Feasibility Worksheet ft.g,,, Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit(MRP) Stormwater Controls for Development Projects Complete this worksheet for C.3 Regulated Projects* for which the soil hydraulic conductivity(Ksat)exceeds 1.6. Use this checklist to determine the feasibility of treating the C.34 amount of runoff* with infiltration. Where it is infeasible to treat the C.3.d amount of runoff* with infiltration or rainwater harvesting and use, stormwater may be treated with biotreetment* measures. See Glossary (Attachment 1)for definitions of terms marked with an asterisk("). 1. Enter Project Data. d 1.1 Project Name: w ,-' � 1.2 Project Address: c E l -ct YY)) ( -.(.4y. 1.3 Applicant/Agent Name: 1.4 Applicant/Agent Address: %g),rr4,a°.. ,. _ '.,- .y ° ) ' e-11 j / r Applicant/Agent r . � a, / 1.5 Applicant/Agent Email: . ;cam. h 4 f /f � t, Phone: ,4 3 ' a. ., 2. Evaluate infiltration feasibility. Check"Yes"or No"to indicate whether the following conditions apply to the project.If"Yes"is checked for any question, then infiltration is infeasible,and you can continue to Item 3.1 without answering any further questions in Section 2. If all of the answers in Section 2 are"No,"then infiltration is feasible,and you may design infiltration facilities* for the area from which runoff must be treated. Items 2.1 through 2.3 address the feasibility of using infiltration facilities*,as well as the potential need to line bioretention areas. Yes No 2.1 Would infiltration facilities at this site conflict with the location of existing or proposed underground utilities or easements,or would the siting of infiltration facilities at this site result in their placement on ❑ top of underground utilities,or otherwise oriented to underground utilities,such that they would discharge to the utility trench, restrict access,or cause stability concerns?(If yes,attach evidence documenting this condition.) 2-2 Is there a documented concern that there is a potential on the site for soil or groundwater pollutants to ❑ be mobilized? (If yes,attach documentation of mobilization concerns.) 2.3 Are geotechnical hazards present,such as steep slopes,areas with landslide potential,soils subject to liquefaction,or would an infiltration facility need to be built less than 10 feet from a building foundation or other improvements subject to undermining by saturated soils?(If yes,attach documentation of ❑ geotechnical hazard.) Respond to Questions 2.4 through 2.8 only if the project proposes to use an infiltration device*. 2.4 Do local water district or other agency's policies or guidelines regarding the locations where infiltration may occur, the separation from seasonal high groundwater,or setbacks from potential sources of pollution prevent infiltration devices from being implemented at this site?(if yes,attach evidence ❑ - documenting this condition.) 2.5 Would construction of an infiltration device require that it be located less than 100 feet away from a septic tank,underground storage tank with hazardous materials,or other potential underground source of pollution? (If yes,attach evidence documenting this claim.) CIA!AI y a - Infiltration Feasibility Worksheet Yes No 2.6 Is there a seasonal high groundwater table or mounded groundwater that would be within 10 feet of the base of an infiltration device*constructed on the site? (If yes,attach documentation of high groundwater.) 2.7 Are there land uses that pose a high threat to water quality—including but not limited to industrial and light industrial activities,high vehicular traffic(i.e.,25,000 or greater average daily traffic on a main [2] roadway or 15,000 or more average daily traffic on any intersecting roadway),automotive repair shops, car washes,fleet storage areas,or nurseries? (If yes,attach evidence documenting this claim.) 2.8 Is there a groundwater production well within 100 feet of the location where an infiltration device would be constructed? (If yes,attach map showing the well.) ❑ 3. Results of Feasibility Determination Infeasible Feasibl 3.1 Based on the results of the Section 2 feasibility analysis, infiltration is(check one): -3 If"FEASIBLE"is indicated for Item 3.1, then the amount of stormwater requiring treatment must be treated with infiltration(or rainwater harvest and use,if feasible). Infiltration facilities* may be designed for the area from which runoff must be treated. -� If INFEASIBLE"is checked for item 3.1, then the applicant may use appropriately designed biotreatment facilities* for compliance with C.3 treatment requirements. The applicant is encouraged to maximize infiltration of stormwater if site conditions allow. Name of Applicant(Print) (- f E� Name of Applicant(Sign) Date s f 11 i.,. J F,.trcn r urom i • 1 e , ' e7 c, Area 1 CD X}-1 t 5 o2 /y] -1 Yt.I^�✓ t3 I - I `7t 3' "6 6 1 .. I res._ I IT, rr G- G. !!#I 11y_14.....!S'c 51.. I f M Yk p'�_r y>, t'_.�'1. t rn - _ w.x e et � - 1 I ( 1 ! i 1. ... ' .- i -. _._± —. _t.___�. .._. _ _ �-- __�__:.._. -- ._-.gin s i_ i s F ,,r �ry 01-1,11.4_ ,.._/*/;;;',_____.........,... A._ E € j i1 , o• ! I rl' i r_. �._�� / �. ,� - , . het ,v i !I C ../...11e1575: �1 L/uL) iuir I'' , c { I L__1_ ._ a ;_. _ !_ 1. I _. `_bv1.- "-- 1 ("Gr.Yt >e. 'd:c=i,. p srf-2,�1r Zvi,, YYI 1.4 I -_I I ! iU_? t it k f � 4I_____.1_._..,._,_.... ,_1-1,-,- 'd fI Pa1 I ., ( ?t,N.i. ,, 4,4. 1,..r..0,?-ii,--:---,.L.. ,-_ .. p • - i i mo, r 1 y1 ti®6`._V sr -it� 6 I,‘ Ai i i Jf I _.. } it 176-1,, � a t = r I } 1. 1 ! 1 I f ,'� - e n N 5 d r-'r d 9!P a iKC i-f .f `"f chi " 1,c7,0 1 .. "ot,(l G. -q-el...^'' e c.,n, 1 `t. _# iii 1--.. ' i I ._ . ._ __ _ --r._ E I 11 , , 1I I . t ' {{ ti t i v i y 11 2, i 7illkc-- 1 1 t �' 0(43/ r I j,„..6 0,.'i"— t Ve 4.,, - .__ /`: t _.. .^ -._ .I Fa .. 1 , ,-,; . _ _ i it, Al.-- ,•---L--l• i I_ i -Li-4..6172 1 ? j , I f 7 I _ ...k.Y f i if -tom... 13� Tf�. .,.. �.... � ��:� Y. I ..... I a_.._. I ._ __�. I t I --._ { S { 1 I 3 _ I ,I'(' _r f)-)tte i _'.� r�L. " ' ! - 2- 1 �"' 26.4 ft I f � a t � , D Vo r �71 i .I t," fie T-'.t_oio a 3 _l 3 r.bt1 ' -l__'�'1_ '1`"/r1 !firtT Y• •-i-- ! i -1 01--X'4-27.-..--':.. �,:2 /- /- I_C 1 o i _nit a, SI i I I I , 1 1 , I Ib ; £ I.. I i.. I ^. f I i i iii , _i tl 3 6 1 I ₹ i� I ,. I .mod... t i rf I •! I E i ?Tiro t r I i i ' 1i 1 ! I r. v+ 4 • , 1 --F----To -1� I � Wi r'; 'o. el I et Ilan 6449 4 it-R „, O b ( , 0J!.....4.__].____I____,..4.1--_-_11)4__D:F.1.3i, 9-ty-ii-c-1,40,ei.--- -....r.- :.-1----41------/1 2-1 I I __ I . _I_ ' ' — a1 i I. ' ! i c�SVO N i 1 1 NAL "! ., 3 y i 1 I• t I ___I.....____, ,......_� I ,,_ 1 0, 1 4. 1__ I _ t w , (01 3 NOV 1 ? Zp1T 'ublic Worksgdministrati o PLAN REVIEW ROUTER CITY OF CAMPBELL ❑New Submittal 1 ❑Resubmitt : (2"d 3rd, 4`h,5th Review) ❑Revision to Existing Permit RECEIVED t M ( APN# 2-7,1__--?-7-0.61, • APPLICATION]/P RMIT# \'7--_ JOB ADDRESS , JOB DESCRIPTION . OPOL-f!1Y/ • COMMERCIAL DRESIDENTIAL P s Green-Point Rated Checklist Structural Calcs. -z,WVSD W '9 V A _Soils/Geotechnical Report School Fee Foliii Truss.Calls. ealth Department Approval VT-24 Calcs. Response Letter CA Green Specs Specifications Initials uilding an Checke By � Date: C�l 1-1A7,---- ❑ PR D ❑NOT APPROVED L C() W tr`uct ra : `.)l) D Date: ` DAPPRovERI * QNOT APPROVED a h , 'fanning Zone: Plan Che�cd By: CA Date: ( l' 1 O .) .1-1› APPROVED ❑NOT APPROVED _. ublic Works la peck B : DaH �/Date: A// 7 c 1 Pl4 . APPROVED NOT APPROVED 1+ire Checked By: k Date: C P 1 D_ �) ‘ArAI,E,PPROVED ❑NOT APPROVED MEMORANDUM CITY OF CAMPBELL TO: Bill Bruckart, Building Official DATE: 05/30/2017 FROM: Doris C. Quai Hoi, Project Engineer (408) 866-2157 SUBJECT: BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Site Address: 95 E Hamilton Avenue(APN 279-27-096) For File No(s): BLD2017-569 (PLN2015-274 and 275) Project Description: New 5,772 SF 2-story office building on a vacant lot that was previously merged under application PLN2010-62. Applicant: Saul Flores PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Do not include the Street Improvement Plan set and the On-Site Grading Plan set in the Building plan set. 2. Resolution No. 4354: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the ,_ applicant is required to complete the Conditions of Approval for the project approved by the Planning Commission on December 13, 2016 (PLN2015-274 and 275). See attached resolution: 3. Public Improvements: The scope of this project triggers the requirement for Boulevard Frontage Improvements as required by Campbell Municipal Code 11.24.040. The City of Campbell's adopted Streetscape Standards identify this portion of Hamilton Avenue as an Image Street with very specific frontage improvement requirements. This project triggers the requirement for the installation of the streetscape improvements. The applicant will be required to construct these improvements and have them completed prior to occupying the building. The Streetscape Standards can be viewed here: (http://www.cityofcampb ell.com/DocumentCenter/View/168) Visit the City's website and follow the submittal requirements for Public Works once this application has received entitlement. The checklist for the various plans required for submittal can be found on the City's Website at City Services►Public Works►Engineering►Land Development).Documents, (or use this link: http://www.cityofcampbell.com/206/Documents). See instructions on: 1. Checklist for Grading and Drainage and 2. Checklist for Street Improvement Plans. The Building Peumit will not be issued until all Public Works Conditions of Approval have been satisfied. These Conditions of Approval are a supplement to the plans by MFA Engineers & Associates. The plans are not approved for construction. Further plan checking by Public-Works will be required post entitlement. 4. Pervious Pavement: On Tuesday September 27t1', Public Works met with Ali Abiani, Civil Engineer on record, and discussed the relocation of the permeable pavers to be installed along the westerly surface parking areas to reduce the total amount of impervious area resulting in keeping below the size threshold for C.3 applicability and eliminate the need for storm water treatment measures. J:\LandDev\Conditions\Bldg\Hamilton E 95 Bldg.docx Page 1 of 1 MEMORANDUM • CITY OF CAMPBELL TO: Cindy McCormick, Project Planner DATE: 09/26/2016 FROM: Doris Quai Hoi, Project Engineer SUBJECT: DRC APPLICATION Site Address: 95 E Hamilton Avenue (APN 279-27-096) For File No(s): PLN2015-274 Project Description: New 7,051 SF 2-story podium office building with additional 3,306 SF - basement and elevator on a vacant lot that was previously merged under application PLN2010-62. Applicant: Saul Flores COMMENTS The scope of this project triggers the requirement for Boulevard Frontage Improvements as required by Campbell Municipal Code 11.24.040 The City of Campbell's adopted Streetscape Standards identify this portion of Hamilton Avenue as an Image Street with very specific frontage improvement requirements. This project triggers the requirement for the installation of the streetscape improvements. The applicant will be required to construct these improvements and have them completed prior to occupying the building. The Streetscape Standards can be viewed here: (http://www.cityofcampbell.com/DocumentCenter/View/168) • On Tuesday September 27t1i, Public Works met with Ali Abiani, Civil Engineer on record, and discussed the relocation of the permeable pavers to be installed along the westerly surface parking areas to reduce the total amount of impervious area resulting in keeping below the size threshold for C.3 applicability and eliminate the need for storm water treatment measures. Visit the City's website and follow the submittal requirements for Public Works once this application has received entitlement. The checklist for the various plans required for submittal can be found on the City's Website at City Services►Public Works►Engineering Land Development,-Documents, (or use this link: http://www.cityofcampbell.com/206/Documents). See instructions on: 1. Checklist for grading and Drainage and 2. Checklist for Street Improvement Plans. The Building Permit will not be issued until all Public Works Conditions of Approval have been satisfied. These Conditions of Approval are a supplement to the plans by MFA Engineers & Associates. The plans are not approved for construction. Further plan checking by Public Works will be required post entitlement. J:\LandDev\Conditions\P1ng\Hamilton Ave E 95 dated 9-23-2016.docx Page 1 of 5 � 95 E Hamilton Avenue (PLN2015-274) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Response Letter: Upon submittal of the Street Improvement Plans and the Grading and Drainage Plans, the applicant shall provide an itemized response letter verifying that all the Public Works Conditions of Approval have been addressed. 2. Preliminary Title Report: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall provide a current(within the past 6 months) Preliminary Title Report. 3. Soils Report: Upon submittal of the Parcel/Final Map, applicant shall provide a soils report prepared by a registered geotechnical or civil engineer. 4. Grading and Drainage Plan: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall conduct hydrology studies based on a ten-year storm frequency, prepare an engineered grading and drainage plan, and pay fees required to obtain necessary grading permits. Prior to occupancy, the design engineer shall provide written certification that the development has been built per the engineered grading and drainage plans. In addition, a plan review letter will be required of the Geotechrucal engineer for the entire grading' and drainage system which should include but is not limited to a review of the subsurface of the non-compacted biotreatment material that may have potential for subsurface failure and surface failure due to vehicle loads. 5. Storm Drain Area Fee: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall pay the required Storm Drain Area fee, currently set at $2,650.00 per net acre, which is $833.00. 6. Storm Water Information: On the grading plans show the amount, in square footage, of: a. Existing impervious area. (1,046,sf) b. Proposed impervious area. (9694 sf) c. Proposed pervious area. (4,826 sf) 7. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Measures: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements, Santa Clara Valley Water District requirements, and the Campbell Municipal Code regarding stormwater pollution prevention. The primary objectives are to improve the quality and reduce the quantity of stormwater runoff to the bay. Resources to achieve- these objectives include Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbook for New Development and Redevelopment ("CA BMP Handbook") by the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA), 2003; Start at the Source: A Design Guidance Manual for Stormwater Quality Protection ("Start at the Source")by the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA), 1999; and Using Site Design Techniques to Meet Development Standards for Stormwater Quality: A Companion Document to Start at the Source ("Using Site Design Techniques") by BASMAA, 2003. J:\LandDev\Conditions\PIng\Hamilton Ave E 95 dated 9-23-2016.docx Page 2 of 5 95 E Hamilton Avenue (PLN2015-274) Only approved open joint pavers or permeable pavers can be installed that are proposed for the parking lot and must meet the Site Design Measures for Small Projects as outlined on the attached cut sheets for pervious pavers. A maintenance agreement and plan will be required so that City staff can make yearly inspections.The City suggests that the permeable pavers be installed in the parking stalls rather than just being placed as shown on C-2 Rev 9-19-16. Minimum permeable paving area must be no less than 1,576 SF with the proposed landscaping at 3,250 SF. 8. Tree Removal(s): To accommodate the required street scape plan, the existing Crape Myrtle tree at 0+94 station identified on Sheet C-4, will be removed as part of this project. Three Evergreen Ash—Fraxinus Uhdei trees will be installed as part of the streetscape plan. 9. Utilities: All on-site utilities shall be installed underground per Section 21.18.140 of the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings or additions. Applicant shall comply with all plan submittals, permitting, and fee requirements of the serving utility companies. • Utility locations shall not cause damage to any existing street trees. Where there are utility conflicts due to established tree roots or where a new tree will be installed, alternate locations for utilities shall be explored. Include utility trench details where necessary. 10. Water Meter(s) and Sewer Cleanout(s): Existing and proposed water meter(s) and sewer cleanout(s) shall be relocated or installed on private property behind the public right-of-way line. Sheet C-2 shows the (N) SCO in the public right-of-way. Also on Sheet C-2 a water meter is shown to be on private property in the (N) driveway approach. Verify with SJW if this is an acceptable location;. If not, the (N) water meter needs to be relocated elsewhere on the property. 11. Utility Coordination Plan: Prior to issuance of building permits for the site, the applicant shall submit a utility coordination plan and schedule for approval by the City Engineer for installation and/or abandonment of all utilities. The plan shall clearly show the location and size of all existing utilities and the associated main lines; indicate which utilities and services are to remain; which utilities and services are to be abandoned, and where new utilities and services will be installed. Joint trenches for new utilities shall be used whenever possible. Sheet C-2 shows the replacement of a 4" lateral to a 6" lateral. Work directly with WVSD on details and design requirements. The Off-Site Civil plans will incorporate a dedicated sheet for WVSD design and details. Applicant will need to coordinate with WVSD during the plan check and review process. 12. Pavement Restoration: Based on the utility coordination plan, the applicant shall prepare a pavement restoration plan for approval by the City Engineer prior to any utility installation or abandonment. Streets that have been reconstructed or overlaid within the previous five years will require boring and jacking for all new utility installations. Hamilton Avenue has not been reconstructed or overlaid in the last 5 years. The pavement restoration plan shall indicate how the street pavement shall be restored following the installation or abandonment of all utilities necessary for the project. J:\LandDev\Conditions\Ping\Hamilton Ave E 95 dated 9-23-2016.docx Page 3 of 5 • 95 E Hamilton Avenue(PLN2015-274) Pavement restoration work will extend to the south side. of E Hamilton Avenue and incorporate both the water lateral and sanitary sewer lateral to create one large rectangular restoration area. There will need to be a review of the traffic control plan and how this work will be accomplished during normal business hours. 13. Street Improvement Agreements / Plans / Encroachment Permit / Fees / Deposits: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, applicant shall execute a street improvement agreement, ,cause plans for public street improvements to be prepared by a registered civil engineer, pay various fees and deposits, post security and provide insurance necessary to obtain an encroachment permit for construction of the standard public street improvements, as required by the City Engineer. The plans shall include the following,. unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer: a. Show location of all existing utilities within the new and existing public right-of-way. b. Relocation of all existing utilities including utility boxes, covers, poles, etc. outside of sidewalk area. No utility boxes, covers, etc. will be allowed in the 7' sidewalk area. c. Removal of existing driveway approaches and necessary sidewalk, curb and gutter. d. Removal of existing curb and gutter, existing sidewalk, driveway approaches and par strip, and install new city streetscape standard. e. Installation of a minimum .of three (3) City approved street trees Evergreen Ash — Fraxinus Uhdei and irrigation at 40 feet on center. One tree will be located west of the new driveway; two will be located east of the,two driveways. (There is a requirement for a 10' landscaped buffer behind private property fronting Hamilton Avenue). Park strip ground cover shall be no mow (fine fescue and hair grass Deschampsia) turf with sub-surface drip irrigation such as Eco-Mats (or approved equal). f. This project is subject to the City's Streetscape Standards for Hamilton Avenue, which requires a 10 foot landscaped park strip with City approved street trees 40 feet on center, and a 7 foot sidewalk. g. Installation of asphalt concrete overlay per street pavement restoration plan for utility • installation and/or abandonment, as required by the City Engineer. h. Installation of traffic control, stripes and signs. Should the any striping work be cut due to utility trench work, the applicant will be required to restripe the entire street frontage and not just the areas that need replaced. i. Construction of conforms to existing public and private improvements, as necessary. The sidewalks will need to conform at each end at a 90 degree angle with at least a minimum of 4' wide sidewalk to connect to the existing sidewalks. This will be finalized in the plan check review process. j. All existing utility boxes and its covers, that will remain in the park strip will require readjustments and must be level to the sidewalk, or as required by the City Engineer. k. Submit final plans in a digital format acceptable to the City. 14. Street Improvements Completed for Occupancy and Building Permit Final: Prior to allowing occupancy and/or final building peunit signoff for any and/or all buildings, the applicant J:\LandDev\Conditions\Ping\Hamilton Ave E 95 dated 9-23-2016.docx Page 4 of 5 • 95 E Hamilton Avenue(PLN2015-274) • shall have the required street improvements and pavement restoration installed and accepted by the City, and the design engineer shall submit as-built drawings to the City. • 15. Maintenance of Landscaping: Owner(s), current and future, are required to maintain the • landscaped park strip and tree wells in the public right of way. This includes, but is not limited to: trees, lawn, plantings, irrigation, etc. Trees shall not be pruned in a manner that would not allow the tree to grow to a mature height. 16. Utility Encroachment Permit: Separate encroachment permits for the installation of utilities to serve the development will be required (including water, sewer, gas, electric, etc.). Applicant shall apply for and pay all necessary fees for utility permits for sanitary sewer, gas, water, electric and all other utility work. • 17. Additional Street Improvements: Should it be discovered after the approval process that new utility main lines, extra utility work or other work is required to service the development, and • should those facilities or other work affect any public, improvements, the City may add conditions to the development/project/permit, at the discretion of the City ,Engineer, to restore pavement or other public improvements to the satisfaction of the City. 18. Trash Enclosure Requirements: • 1. NPDES Permit No. CAS612008 (CRWQCB): C.3.a.i. (7): • For all new development and redevelopment projects that are subject to the Permittee's planning,building, development, or other comparable review,but not regulated by • Provision C.3, encourage the inclusion of adequate source control measures to limit pollutant generation, discharge, and runoff. These source control measures should include: - o Covered trash, food waste, and compactor enclosures. 2. Campbell Municipal Code 14.02.030 "Stormwater Pollution Control/ Requirements". The code states that no pollutants or water containing pollutants can be discharged into the City's storm drain system. Trash enclosures contain pollutants. During a rain event (or during general cleaning)water washes over and into roofless enclosures, collecting pollutants and discharging to the City's storm drain system. Applicants are required to show how new trash enclosures will not discharge pollutants into the storm drain system. One possible method is to provide a sanitary drain in the trash enclosure. 3. West Valley Sanitation District (WVSD) the local sanitary sewer agency's authority and standards: If a sanitary connection will be installed, WVSD requires a roof on the enclosure. • • • J:\LandDev\Conditions\Ping\Hamilton Ave E 95 dated 9-23-2016.docx Page 5 of 5 -14 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE � _ r r ROUTING SHEET DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION n Distribution: September 17, 2015 November 19, 2015 , N Presentation: November 19, 2015 Conditions /Comments: December 3, 2015 . ROUTE TO: X Building Division Police Department X Fire Department Economic Development X Land Development Engineer X Traffic Engineer PROJECT DESCRIPTION: New 7,051 SF 2-story podium office building with additional 3,306 SF Basement and Elevator on vacant lot. Over 10,000 SF hardscape. Tree removal permit. Reference previous applications: PLN2010-62, PLN2009-06(expired) and BLD2009-00458 File No.: PLN2015-274 APNs: 279-27-096 Applicant: Saul Flores Property Owners: 95 Hamilton, LLC Project Addresses: 95 E. Hamilton Zoning District: Professional Office General Plan Designation: Professional Office PROJECT PLANNER: Cindy McCormick DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: If it can be determined that this project will require minimal or no comments by your department/agency, please return this comment sheet with your initials to the Project Planner as soon as possible. Status Initial Conditions g° No Conditions Additional information/revisions(see attached) v s, F MEMORANDUM CITY OF CAMPBELL TO: Cindy McCormick, Project Planner DATE: 12/4/15 FROM: Doris Quai Hoi, Project Engineer / { SUBJECT: DRC APPLICATION Site Address: 95 E. Hamilton Avenue For File No(s): PLN2015-274 Project Description: New Commercial office building; 7051 SF two-story building w/3,306 SF basement and elevator; and a tree removal permit. This project is subject to C.3 requirements however should the developer use Applicant: Saul Flores COMMENTS The scope of this project triggers the requirement for Frontage Improvements as required by Campbell Municipal Code 11.24.040. The City of Campbell's adopted Streetscape Standards identifying Hamilton Avenue as an Image Street with very specific frontage improvement requirements as shown on page 9 of the document. The applicant will be required to construct these improvements and have them completed prior to occupying the building. The Streetscape Standards can be viewed here: (http://www.cityofcampbell.com/DocumentCenter/View/168) Additional links: 1. http://www. cityofcampbell . com/206/Documents (Land Developement City Standard Details and Specifications , Templates, Forms etc) 2 . http://www. cityofcampbel1 . com/268/Runoff-Program (C. 3 Data Form Work Sheets) 3 . http://www.scvurppp-w2k. com/c3_handbook_2012 .shtml (ForC.3 Requirements, refer to the C.3 Stormwater Handbook; April 2012. This can be found on SCURVPPP's website.) These Completeness Comments are a supplement to "The Eagle Building" dated September 11, 2015 by Mena Architects. The plans are not approved. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COMPLETENESS COMMENTS 1. For space management purposes, on the preliminary utility/on-site plans, show any major utility systems such as transformer, irrigation systems, backflow preventers, etc that will be located on private property. 2. The City does not allow connection of private storm drain laterals to connect directly behind a stoiui drain inlet nor does the City allow through curb drains daylighting into the gutter pan. The proposed storm should tie to the existing stouni main on Hamilton Avenue with a new manhole. Profiles of the new and existing storm mains and manholes should be J:\LandDev\Completeness\Specific Projects\Hamilton Ave E 95.docx Page 1 of 2 95 E. Hamilton Ave (PLN2015-274) engineered and provided including calculations that the proposed and existing storm system can handle the storm flows from a 10-year storm event and that the pre Q and post Q are equal (TO BE SUBMITTED). Or provide alternate methods to retain on site. 3. The applicant may be"able to reduce the amount of impervious surface below the threshold for C.3 applicability and eliminate the need for stormwater treatment measures. This can be done by increasing self-retaining areas, convert impervious to pervious such as using pervious pavers, pervious concrete, pervious asphalt, interlocking concrete pavers or grid pavements when designed to store and infiltrate the rainfall runoff volume. Green roofs are another site design measure. 4. Submit calculations that are consistent with the submitted preliminary grading plans that show the proposed project will meet storm water requirements pertaining to the City's NPDES permit C.3 provisions (flow based or volume based on-site design measures). The proposed plan should show storm water on-site treatment elements The C.3 provision requires that approximately 80% of the on-site storm water drainage is treated. (The allowed treatment measures will include: reuse, infiltration, evapotranspiration and biotreatment.) Once more information is provided further completeness comments could be added. 5. Post Entitlement during plan check: (FYI) There should be one or more sheets designated for the civil storm water management plan. These sheets will be used for reference for the life of the project for maintenance purposes and annual inspections. 6. Post Entitlement during plan check: (FYI) please note that all C.3 Landscaping scope of work shall be part of the civil stormwater management plan sheets. Areas that are designated as bioretention areas shall have plant species selected that are suitable for the location. See planting guidance of the SCVURVPPP C.3 Handbook in Appendix D - "Plant List and Planting Guidance for Landscape-Based Stormwater Measures". 7. Storm Water Information: On the grading/utility plans show the amount, in square footage, of: a. Existing impervious area. b. Proposed impervious area. c. Proposed pervious area. 8. Plan Lines: The Public Works Department has updated the On-Site and Off-Site templates. Visit the City website at: http://www.cityofcampbell.com/206/Documents. Note the City of Campbell has its own details a. Civil Sheet C-6 — Use City of Campbell Details (not San Jose or Mountain View) — City of Campbell does not allow thru-curb drains. b. Visit the City's website for updated City Standard Updated details; details shown are outdated. J:\LandDev\Completeness\Specific Projects\Hamilton Ave E 95.docx Page 2 of 2 A.°�$;�c��''°� DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE ROUTING SHEET A °f• " ,. y DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION '�kCH ARO Distribution: September 17,2015 Presentation: October 8, 2015 (out of office on 9/24 and 10/1) Conditions/Comments: October 8, 2015 ROUTE TO: X Building Division Police Department X Fire Department Economic Development X Land Development Engineer X Traffic Engineer PROJECT DESCRIPTION: New commercial office building. 7,051 SF two-story building with 3,306 SF Basement and Elevator. Over 10,000 SF hardscape. Tree removal permit. Reference PLN2009-00006 (expired) and BLD2009-00458 File No.: PLN2015274 APNs: -279-27 096 Applicant: Saul Flores Property Owners: 95 Hamilton, LLC -Q - r a � . , Project Addresses: 95 E. Hamilton Zoning District: Professional Office SEA 17 2015 General Plan Designation: Professional Office Pubic. PROJECT PLANNER: Cindy McCormick DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATION: If it can be determined that this project will require minimal or no comments by your department/agency, please return this comment sheet with your initials to the Project Planner as soon as possible. Status Initial Conditions No Conditions Additional information/revisions(see attached) Santa Clara Valley . Urban t'nnoff I Pollution Prevention Program [} PROVISION C.3 y� FORM SEP I 2015 Y RO V ISION DATA�+ORM or(OF CAMPBELL Which Projects Must Comply with Stormwater Requirements? PLANNING DEPT All projects that create and/or replace 10,000 sq.ft. or more of impervious surface on the project site must fill out this worksheet and submit it with the development project application. All restaurants, auto service facilities, retail gasoline outlets, and uncovered parking lot projects (stand-alone or part of another development project, including the top uncovered portion of parking structures)that create and/or replace 5,000 sq.ft. or more of impervious surface on the project site must also fill out this worksheet. Interior remodeling projects,routine maintenance or repair projects such as re-roofing and re-paving, and single family homes that are not part of a larger plan of development are NOT required to complete this worksheet. What is an Impervious Surface? An impervious surface is a surface covering or pavement that prevents the land's natural ability to absorb and infiltrate rainfall/stormwater. Impervious surfaces include,but are not limited to rooftops, walkways, paved patios, driveways, parking lots, storage areas,impervious concrete and asphalt, and any other continuous watertight pavement or covering. Pervious pavement, underlain with pervious soil or pervious storage material(e.g., drain rock), that infiltrates rainfall at a rate equal to or greater than surrounding unpaved areas OR that stores and infiltrates the water quality design volume specified in Provision C.3.d of the Municipal Regional Stormwater Permit(MRP), is not considered an impervious surface. For More Information For more information regarding selection of Best Management Practices for stormwater pollution prevention or stormwater treatment contact: 1. Project Information Project Name: tr.,rc (.1', hL c<< _ APN# ° - Project Address: <9... " . -C n, t Cross Streets: Applicant/Developer Name: r r 7,5 , f _ 'e Project Phase(s): of Engineer: P°' `t ; k y { 'fr'4 "yr r.,r 4,(: t' . ' Project Type (Check all that apply): Q'New Development 0 Redevelopment D Residential ❑ Commercial ❑ Industrial D Mixed Use 0 Public 0 Institutional ❑ Restaurant 0 Uncovered Parking 0 Retail Gas Outlet 0 Auto Service (SIC code) ❑ (5013-5014,5541,7532-7534,7536-7539) Other Project Description: i-4 C 1 IA)D i-:1'O7;, �., E; i s� ,} t�. (--;)1)i ) (14 ° Project Watershed/Receiving Water (creek, river or bay): SCVURPPP C.3.Data Form Page 1 of 4 November 2011 2. Project Size a.�Total Site Area: b.Total Site Area Disturbed: acre `` -20P-f (). : acre (including clearing,grading,or excavating) 2 Proposed Area(ft2) Total Post-Project Existing Area(ft ) Replaced New Area(ft2) Impervious Area Roof Y' Z,..)- &-= \- Parking ''.}n t,. k,., j' ° <^^ Sidewalks and Streets, ", ,.s, '' c / 9 7 c.Total Impervious Area d.Total new and replaced impervious area A ..2/ Pervious Area Landscaping 29 526; Pervious Paving -9 Other(e.g. Green Root) e.Total Pervious Area 2; 9 f.Percent Replacement of Impervious Area in Redevelopment Projects (Replaced Total Impervious Area Existing Total Impervious Area) x 100% = 75. % e fg 3..? 3. State Construction General Permit Applicability: ,. ;f a. Is#2.b. equal to 1 acre or more? O Yes, applicant must obtain coverage under the State Construction General Permit (i.e., file a Notice of Intent and prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan) (see ww.swrcb.ca.gov/water issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml for details). No, applicant does not need coverage under the State Construction General Permit. 4. MRP Provision C.3 Applicability: a. Is#2.d. equal to 10,000 sq. ft. or more, or 5,000 sq. ft. or more for restaurants, auto service facilities, retail gas outlets, and uncovered parking? (*Note that for public projects, the 5,000 sq.ft. threshold does not take effect until 12/1/12.) O Yes, C.3. source control, site design and treatment requirements apply ❑ No, C.3. source control and site design requirements may apply—check with local agency b. Is#2.f. equal to 50% or more? ❑ Yes, C.3. requirements (site design and source control, as appropriate, and stormwater treatment) apply to entire site ❑ No, C.3. requirements only apply to impervious area created and/or replaced 5. Hydromodification Management (HM) Applicability: a. Does project create and/or replace one acre or more of impervious surface AND is the total post-project impervious area greater than the pre-project (existing) impervious area? ❑ Yes (continue) O No—exempt from HM, go to page 3 b. Is the project located in an area of BiN/1 applicability (green area) on the HM Applicability Map? ( www.scvurppp-w2k.com/hmp maps.htm ) O Yes, project must implement HM requirements ❑ No, project is exempt from HM requirements SCVURPPP C.3.Data Form Page 2 of 4 November 2011 6. Selection of Specific Stormwater Control Measures: Site Design Measures Source Control Measures Treatment Systems ❑ Minimize land disturbed U Alternative building ❑ None (all impervious surface materials drains to self-retaining areas) U Minimize impervious surfaces ❑ Wash area/racks, drain to LID Treatment U Minimum-impact street sanitary sewer- ❑ Rainwater harvest and or parking lot design ❑ Covered dumpster area, • -use (e.g.,cistern or rain barrel sized for C.3.d treatment) drain to sanitary sewer2 ❑ Cluster structures/ ® Infiltration basin pavement ❑ -Sanitary sewer connection or accessible ❑ Infiltration trench ❑ Disconnected downspouts cleanout for swimming ❑ Exfiltration trench ❑ Pervious pavement pool/spa/fountain2 ❑ Underground detention ElGreen roof Li Beneficial landscaping (minimize irrigation,runoff, and infiltration system ❑ Microdetention in (e.g.pervious pavement drain pesticides and fertilizers; landscape promotes treatment) rock,large diameter conduit) ❑ Other self-treating area ❑ Outdoor material storage Biotreatment 3 ❑ Self-retaining area protection Bioretention area ❑ Rainwater harvesting and ❑ Covers, drains for loading U Flow-through planter use (e.g.,rain barrel,cistern docks, maintenance bays, ❑ Tree box with connected to roof drains)1 fueling areas bioretention soils ❑ Preserved open space: ❑ Maintenance (pavement ❑ Other ac. or sq. ft , sweeping, catch basin cleaning,good housekeeping) (circle one) ❑ Protected riparian and ❑ Storm drain labeling Other Treatment Methods wetland areas/buffers ❑ Proprietary tree box filter4 (Setback from top of bank: CI Other ft) ❑ Media filter (sand,a compost, or proprietary media) U Other ❑ Vegetated filter strips ❑ Dry detention basins ❑ Other Flow Duration Controls for Hydromodification Management(HM) ❑ Detention basin ❑ Underground ❑ Bioretention with outlet ❑ Other tank or vault control 1 Optional site design measure; does not have to be sized to comply with Provision C.3.d treatment requirements. 2 Subject to sanitary sewer authority requirements. 3 Biotreatment measures are allowed only with completed feasibility analysis showing that infiltration and rainwater harvest and use are infeasible. 4 These treatment measures are only allowed if the project qualifies as a"Special Project". 5 These treatment measures are only allowed as part of a multi-step treatment process. SCVURPPP C.3.Data Form Page 3 of 4 November 2011 7. Treatment System Sizing for Projects with Treatment Requirements Indicate the hydraulic sizing criteria used and provide the calculated design flow or volume: Treatment System Component Hydraulic Sizing Design Flow or Criteria Used3 Volume (cfs or cu.ft.) 3Key: la: Volume—WEF Method lb: Volume—CASQA BMP Handbook Method 2a: Flow —Factored Flood Flow Method 2b: Flow—CASQA BMP Handbook Method 2c: Flow—Uniform Intensity Method 3: Combination Flow and Volume Design Basis 8. Alternative Certification: Was the treatment system sizing and design reviewed by a qualified third- party professional that is not a member of the project team or agency staff? ❑ Yes ❑ No Name of Reviewer 9. Operation & Maintenance Information A. Property Owner's Name B. Responsible Party for Stormwater Treatment/Hydromodification Control O&M: a. Name: b. Address: c. Phone/E-mail: This section to be completed by Municipal staff. O&M Responsibility Mechanism Indicate how responsibility for O&M is assured. Check all that apply: ❑ O&M Agreement ❑ Other mechanism that assigns responsibility(describe below): Reviewed: Community Development Department Public Works Department Planning Division: Engineering: Building Division: Other(Specify): Return form to: Data entry performed by: SCVURPPP C.3.Data Form Page 4 of 4 November 2011 Photos of 95 E Hamilton Ave ;� A _ ^� 1 I _ ./ . 111* Facing West Facing East ^, . illAII; 'jk k) ' a 3 4 ,_, „ At, ,.:I! ....... ..„,,—_- _ ....... ...... _.dOr �` �.S‘Pcdc . ., ,Facing West Facing East :omit, • lilt o, I ! at. -1 .f 1:::;?,w,:,..040,4*.ar. ,dige f llilliatest„_ . .„, , r,-,,,,I-'!.",' .:70v-li . 0yy as/ Facing West Facing East Photos of 95 E Hamilton R Ave / , ' Detail of PG&E utility box Detail of SDCI �. 3 .gyp• + :r≥ .7, ., #. � � 4 L_ , vim ,. 2 { mot . % SY , I' ''• tr r. .'4414 r Detail of WMB in park strip Detail of WMB in park strip w r . 8 ;, a e 7 I , - I i / rr ( 1 N. r,"' Detail of AT&T and PG&E utility boxes Detail of water hand hole in ROW Land Development Information sheet Prepared by: ICH APN: 279-27-096 Date: 9-24-2015 Address: 95.E Hamilton Ave Lot size: 14,520 (SF) Any found records of building permits in last five years? Yes❑ (provide info below)No Was permit issued? Yes❑ (provide info below)No If yes,what is nature of work: Permit Number: If this project is part of a larger development(new subdivision,new townhomes) or commercial development, skip A through D. New commerical office building A. Existing building area(SF): - B.Proposed additional area(SF): ,(Use the area from five years back) C. Total area w/addition(A+B): D. Percent increase(B/A): (if less than 50%, stop research) Tract or Parcel Map : Tract 390 Date recorded: Nov. 1946 (Tract#or book&page) Any found records of Storm Drain Area fee previously paid? Yes ❑ (provide info below) No (Fee initiated for residential subdivisions 4 8/15/55; all developments 4 5/16/60) Date paid , (file'#&address or LID#) Storm Drain.Area fee: 0.33 ac(area in acres) X $2,650/ac(fee/acre) = $833 Within STANP? Yes ❑ No® (check one) STANP Requirements: Curb❑ Gutter❑ Sidewalk❑ Rolled curb❑ None❑ NA Existing improvements present? Curb® Gutter ® Sidewalk ® (check all that apply) Sidewalk dimension(BOW to FOW): 5' Park strip dimension(FOW to BOC): 4.5' Driveway dimension(s): 9' (2 DWY's) D/W ADA compliant? Yes ® No ❑ Ramp ADA compliant? Yes❑ No❑ Street ROW half width(CL to PL): 45' Date that street had been'resurfaced: Apr 2008 Street light info: JP❑ older pole❑ galvanized pole Water meter and sewer cleanout info: 2 WM in park strip SD inlet and/or manhole(relation to frontage): SDCI located between DWY's Electrical panel relocation? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Overhead lines fronting property? ❑ Yes ®No A.Roadway Classification: ®Arterial,Collector or ❑ Local B.Commercial structure or subdivision of 5 or more? ❑Yes No Utility undergrounding required? ❑Yes ®No Provide details and attach pictures(8.5x11),assessors map(11x17)and aerial map(8.5 x 11),WVSD SD system map (11x17,B/W),SD Map-CAD File(8.5x11) PI44 a ? p,t e V 110.0 LEGEND:: �� =,� 0.# �� y 4 0 Sidewalk: • 4S = 0lib414 4411"." _ ii el 1 Driveway: III _t r , al pWater Meter: . ..,... , , , ,..,.._ 4 3' f .„0 * ... _ ,......, 43 4 'Cures 7C1--------' 1 ill SJ 11 ,- L « 95 & 109 Street Light: J. I r • '`i, , . 4. • 4 Fence Line: « ' IV Tfte i , ,.. ..z 900 GCE . i a 1 1 I°rt.- } DWY -CE' F i 4111 iWY (PAC BELL)IRO 41/ j 30 60'. A 111., (4- ,. 41,11, , Photos of 95 E. Hamilton Ave. \ lots& @ g P a A a Sif .,F S e :i€ WCs4-es,,,, fe. fQcA 1-T y 4p.' . t .'. r. CI n . as ! • x, w p w • y' f f -s- r DOCTOR '"' 3 - . ,' Jam'_l .. jerk..1 f\--P,;\<- _t• ••.- , . • 6C0-kill. 12 &t an �as+- Photos of 95 E. Hamilton Ave. • 14. ,1. r• . L ., r, 7.• r • f 14 . liiik 4;' \,..........2-..l \lw- %- - 4',..,... r v @ fecit k' Wof f‘...t<2.-in`y . :,....4.51.__ • � 1. t. '' �'j i ''. ,...i,t'r-•-••:''s ,. -��- • w, ik... ar till wes-- .,_....------ .-....... A w.. 1 e i r7, 7 ,./- ..____„„_,_ } HAMILTON 30 42 42 t ! IN WY I ry U > Qt tn,,,DiN4 .1(1 > WATSON DR w 0 _ MI-4 �'� U z ) 3 N COMES CT i- .:4 , 7 :z . :,' _ ,, • fA ' /7 , itif WI I7 21 21 E. LAT�M�ER PUFFIN v z ANDERLIN% ► H CT ° ~ OFFICE O F COUNTY ASSESSOR SANTA CLARA COUNTY , CALIFORNIA BOOK PAGE 279 27 1 28 29 I o I -- - 1 'z �'- I 183 \ // II - - -- - - -- -- STREET =o 3a oe il:,______— � o — DETRACEY - — �, TRACT NE 1799 /479 /483 /487 /4s/ /495 I - 104.n - _ /456 /459 4E3 /4G'7 it O , 183.01 41.61 SZ85 57.85 1 57.85 57.85 I 62 I 60 1 62 I 57.85 I 57.85 i 57.85 57.83 39.6 w r p i t i 1 I i N p 50 22�. �., I I I I 1 M 7 I 1 u>I m1 'r' of °D c 98.60 PCL- I. Z �,' NI m m1 e; hl M! Ni -1 °! r 60' m ---- cr A 39 !9 P. M. 338-M-30 30 0 8 9 0,l /O // /2 r 1 /3 /4 �I /5 /6 ri i /7 h 1 /8 ,, /9 a 1 20 0 _ — h1 as _ I I I I I h� p d on al I I I I I o,In p hl • ion Ltl 36 i 35 I 34 33 32 1 31 30 I 29 I 28 I 27 I 26 I 25 I 24 N N Lt.16 2 , ..._—.1 40.15 17.70 ...—.1._._... ' ..._....L__..._ ___L_.--... I ...�__... ' _L 6 3.99 N N 97.01 l 18 3.01 ... ?� 160 — 234.67 236.60 141.40 o 141.01 •• -1----"739:01 �I (I) N' 7 1 • I 2 :o 15 ?/ fi 56 16 a! 33 59 4',. '-::' ? I m� 0.936 AC. NET 0.957 AC. NET 41.39 Ill 141 I N ---- ---- - Z 132 v H , 14 ?2 N J N 55 17 ° 35 r 34 5 - _ o gs o^ G N 13 23 o o 54 IS 14,520 sf L.L.A.20274210 it i■� - IQ ETHER -- ----- 67.49 170.17 _ - - -- - -- 132 ... I AVENUE -------- --- 26 ' v F • �� 5 35 ,, 12 24 q 53 19 i 30 �2 1 ' 0.995 AC. NET ` 3p5I ��? ' 1.60 AC. NET 5 — ----- +--- r` 52 20 29 63 ro 0 E w co o I I 25 �n m N N O ° 4 • y 3 �� >M1r�� p N .�� ^ 33 �, 10 26 �a7 0 5/ 21 28 6Q s .- DETAIL SCALE 1"=30vn o-U)e-- 4 � • __ � --•------- } 1399.31 9.62 9.62 9.62 9.62 9.62 14.31 py� — (jQ M8 9 10 II 12 1327K 9 27 n W h to 50 2 2 1 27 46�� 60 co U I 141 a3' 21 22 23 24 25 26 — �• ---- — Z 139 Q B v 136.63 270 94 8 28 a v n 49 23 26 0 ,• 7 6 5 4 3 2 I p n—... 1 34.82... Q ...274.42 _ PTN. LOT I 141 Z 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 — p�__ 3 _ PTN. LOT 2 ?� 141.39 __ __ ___ O - 1.04 AC. NET ---------- - CC 47 I- I A ti:Q 7 o 29 24 ' z5 "' J CONDOMINIUM PLAN ___ _166.54 Q -� w -- 123 (139) _ vt Q TRACT N27508 91.554 T-75 m 37 ro m _6_6.40 T- 75 (n -T- 1 49.99 i 73.0, ro Z 32 Ia1.a O 4 ! 3 I 2 i 1 ° t° • 0.35 AC. M M co Lli at ° p ! OWNERS REQUEST Q, m Ni 30' M 2 / �° U .n 3/ IO I 2000—01 - w O N co "'1 6J 45',.f( _ .o m _ s o' 0 _ 94 SEE D.ETAIL�ow — 46174.91 75 115.08 l `• 203.4 50 74 _ I `; /462 /5/0 O' /482 /538 121.58 55.96 66 7'9.29 lo c;" J �— n /550 /580 /600 ' P. C. KEITH'S SUBD. N- 2 _ -•• D _ -u> up w) TRACT N2 7508 v ----- - S. WINCHESTER ? - - -- ----( F MLY. S. Clr L. G. ROAD ) --- ----- ---- - - BOULEVARD - I WINCHESTER rnAoer w uros U EXECUTIVE OFFICE Q W LAWRENCE E. STONE - ASSESSOR J Q> W BK CONDOMINIUMS Cadastral map for assessment purposes only. __II-- 4? 305 Compiled under R. & T. Code, Sec. 327. Q p �!0 Effective Roll Year 2015-2016 U -