Loading...
PC Min 11/24/1992CITY OF CAMPBELL PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 24, 1992 City Council Chambers 7:30 P.M. 70 North First Street Campbell, California The Planning Commission meeting of November 24, 1992, was called to order at 7:30 pm, in the Council Chambers, 70 North First Street, Campbell, California, by Chairperson Fox, and the following proceedings were had to wit: ROLL, CALL Commissioners Present: Chairperson: David Fox Commissioner: Jay Perrine (arrived at 7:45 p.m.) Commissioner: Jane Meyer-Kennedy Commissioner: Mark Wilkinson Commissioner~ I. (Bud)Alne Commissioner Absent: Commissioner: Alana Higgins Staff Present: Director of Planning, Steve Piasecki Planner 1, Gloria M. Sciara Reporting Secretary, Karon Shaban City Engineer, Joan Bollier Assistant City Attorney, Joe Raineri APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: MOT/ON: On motion of Connnissioner Alne~ swonded by Commissioner Wilkinson, the Planning Commission minutes of November 10, 1992, were unanimously approved as subraitted (4-0-2), Commissioners Higgins and Perrine being absent. AGENDA MODIFICATIONS OR POSTPONEMENTS Director of Planning, Mr. Steve Piasecki, pointed out that Agenda Item No. 4, should have been listed under public hearings. COMMUNICATIONS: Items of communication were included with the packet distribution. The following items were received a~ter the packets were delivered: - Conditions of Approval and Findings Item No. 3. Flyer for Annual Commissioners' Luncheon ORAL REOUESTS:. There were no oral requests. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Chairperson Fox read the application into the record. Item No. t. S 92-04: Public Hearing to consider the application of Mr. Colin Jaques for approval of a Site and Architectural Permit to allow construction of an industrial building located at 184 Veitenhiemer Lane, in a M I-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Ms. Gloria Sciara, Planner 1, presented the staf~ report, noting the following: * The applicant's request for a two-story industrial building; 40 percent warehouse use and 10 percent office use. * The lot is currently vacant, and accessible from a private driveway (an easement) off McGlincey Lane. * Conforms to development standards of the zoning district. * McGlincey Lane Area Expansion Plan, recently adopted by City Council identified public rights-of-way in the area for public street construction. * Complies with current parking standards, however, public street construction will create a deficit of 2 parking spaces at the proposed site~ * Staff is recommending approval with a stipulation that the applicant provide a reservation for dedication of 18 feet along the site frontage on Veitenhiemer Lane, * Staff~ is further suggesting the addition of a Conditions of Approval (number 21 ) requiring the applicant to demonstrate his authority to use the easement for access to and ~rom the site. * Staff will support the application, with staff modifications as noted above. Commissioner Meyer-Kennedy asked about the parking deficiency, and Ms. Sciara explained that the intended use will not require more spaces than what is being proposed. Commissioner Alne provided the Site and Architectural Review Committee's report of November 12, 1992, recommending approval. However, the Committee suggested increasing the land dedication from 15 feet to 18 feet for planned street improvements in the area, as referenced by staff. Chairperson Fox opened tine Public Hearing. planning Commission, Minu~ tes of November 24~ 1992, Mr. Anthony Torrez, 82 McGlincey Lane, raised concerns relating to storm water and iLs drainage. Ms~ Joan Bollier, City Engineer, Public Works Department, explained that currently the storm water runs away from Mr. Torrez's property. Public Works seeks overqand flow to McGlincey Lane. Mr. Colin Jaques, the applicant, expressed confusion relating to Public Works's recommendation regarding the provision of a drainage system and street improvements. Ms. Bollier and the Chair clarified drainage processes, with Ms. Bollier pointing out that numerous options were explored and the option most equitable to Mr. Jaques (installation of French Drains) is not feasible, since it violates the Valley's Water Quality Management Standards~ Another concern was voiced by Mr~ Jaques, that the City is requiring him to pave the street and maintain it. His business utilizes one small truck, and Sweeney and Sons, who share the street, have a more trucks, larger trucks and their use is more intensive than his business. No one else addressed the Commission. Commissioner Perrine arrived at 7:45 p.m. On motion of Commissioner Meyer-Kennm~ searnded by Commissioner Wilkinson the Public Hearing was unanimously dosed. MOTION: On motion of Commissioner Meyer-Kennedy, sevonded by Commissioner Wilkinson, Resolution No. 2828 was adopted with the recommended findings adding Cond~'tions No. 21, to require the applicant to show proof of his right to us~ the easement for ingress and egress along Veitenhi~mer Izme. The motion carried by the following roll AYEX' NOE X' ABSENE: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Meyer. Kennedy, Wilkinson, Alne and Fox Commissioners: None Commissioner:. Higgins Commissioner:. Perrine Chairperson Fox read the application into the record. Item No. 2 S 92- 08: Public Hearing to consider the application of Mr. Mike Picetti for approval of a Site and Architectural Permit to allow two single-family homes on property located at 1846 A & B Regina Way, in an R-1-9 (Single-Family ~lanning Commission 31invte4 d November, 24~,,199,2, Residential) Zoning District. Ms. Gloria Sciara, Planner I, presented the Staff Report dated November 24, 1992. She noted the following: * Applicant's request is to construct two single-family homes on a previously subdivided parcel. * Size, location and lot configuration * Conformance to setbacks and development standards. * Supported by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. Staff is recommending approval. Chairperson Fox opened the public hearing, however, there was no one wishing to address the Commission for this item. J4OT/ON: On motion of Commissioner Meyer-Kennedy, seomded by Commissioner Wilkinson the Public Hearing was unanimously dosed MOTION: AYEX. NOE & ABSENF: ABSTAIN: On motion of Commissioner Wilkinson, seconded by Commissioner Meyo'-Kennedy, Resolution No. 2829 was adopted approving the application as re~mmended by Staff, by the following roll call vot~ Commissione~,: Commissioners: Commissione~. Commissione~. Perrine~ Meyer-Kennedy, Wilkinson, Alne and Fox None Higgins No~ Chairperson Fox read the next application into the record. Item No. 3. S 92- 11/SA 92-45: Public Hearing to consider the application of Fry's Electronic Store for approval of a Site and Architectural Permit to allow a freeway- oriented sign; and,/exception to the Sign Ordinance to allow more signage in excess of the number, size and height normally permitted within commercial uses, on property located at 600 East Hamilton Avenue, in a PD (Planned Development ) Zoning District. Director of Planning, Mr. Steve Piasecki, presented the Staff Report dated November 24, 1992, noting the findings and Conditions of Approval submitted at 7:30 p.m., this day. Upon display Plannine,Commission Minus, o£ No~em,,ber 24, 1992 ,, ,, 4 were charts, renderings, and a geometric description prepared by staff and referenced during the presentation~ Mr. Piasecki suggested that a mock-up of the proposed sign would be beneficial, and the following information was provided: * The item contains two separate applications: t) a Sign exception to allow an excess of square footaqe, number, and height of the signs. Final approval rests with the Planning Commission;-and 2) Site and Architectural approval to allow a free-way oriented sign. Final approval rests with the City Council and the Planning Commission is being asked to forward a recommendation for Council consideration on December 7, 1992. This portion of the application was pre-advertised in order to allow tine application to proceed with his project. * Location and square footage of signs requested. * Ordinance requirements for signage. * Freeway©riented signs are required to demonstrate findings that support the following: * Denial of the application would cause undo hardship to the operation of the proposed business at the proposed site; and * The business operation is dependent upon a free-way oriented sign. * Staff believes that these findings can be supported, since Fry's Electronics has a regional market and attracts customers all directions. The property has limited visibility from the freeway due to mature trees and landscaping along the freeway. RECOMMENDATION FOR SA 92-45: * Staff recommends approval of the sign exception for wall-mounted signs, a~d the free- standing sign, however suggests continuance of a portion of the request (two directional signs) to the Planning Commission meeting of January t 2, 1993. Staff feels that the directional signs reading, "Charlie Chip," do not satisfy the intent. RECOMMENDATION FOR S 92-1 t' signs within the City of Campbell. Staff provided a comparison of existing freeway oriented Staff recommends a revision to the freeway-oriented sign design, prior to submittal of the application to the City Council on December 7, t992, displaying fluted columns. The Planning Director asked that the applicant be required to provide a mock-up of tlne sign in order for Council members to view it from the freeway~ Staff will not support illumination of the sign background, but will support illumination of the letters. Commissioner Perrine asked Mr. Piasecki to review the sign ordinance, and Mr. Piasecki read portions of the ordinance to the Commission. Commissioner Meyer-Kennedy asked if the ordinance specified a height restriction for freeway- oriented signs. Mr. Piasecki said it did not specify height. Commissioner Wilkinson asked what the maximum height for signs is. Mr. Piasecki stated that the maximum height for signs is 14 feet. planninv Comn~ission Minutq.,e[ November 24, 1.99~ .,,5 Commissioner Wilkinson expressed concern that a precedent would be set for other business owners in the area who want to have freeway-oriented signs. Mr. Piasecki informed the Commission of the potential application submittal from Hewlett- Packard for warehouse space. He assured the Commission that the approval of a retail store at this location is limited because parking for retail use is limited. Commissioner Wilkinson asked Mr. Piasecki to review the comparison between similar signs in Campbell. Mr. Piasecki provided information relating to heights relating to distance from the freeway of similar signs. Commissioner Alne reviewed the recommendation of the Site and Architectural Review Committee meeting of November 12, 1992, noting that the Committee was supportive of the sign proposal except that the '~Charlie Chip" signs which were inadequate for directional signs. Commissioner Alne pointed out the entrances displayed to illustrate how deliveries would be made. He suggested the importance of better defined entrance signs. Further, Commissioner Alne discussed the freeway-oriented sign, stating that a sign of 45 feet in height, located at the specified point would be the most logical, due to installation of trees by Caltrans. The Committee assumed that a freeway-oriented sign would be supported by the Council, therefore, no recommendation was made~ Chairperson Fox opened the Public Hearing. Mr. Leonard Sabatini, Development Director of Fry's Electronics, expressed his excitement about the proposed store in Campbell. The proposed store will be the largest Fry's Electronic Store ever built. Commissioner Alne asked if Mr. Sabatini was satisfied with staffs representation of the proposed freeway-oriented sign, and Mr. Sabatini indicated his satisfaction, ~Fhe main consideration ~or Fry's is that customers be able to see the sign prior to passing the exits to get there. Commissioner Perrine asked Mr. Sabatini about the directional signs. In response, Mr. Sabatine stated that Fry's would like to have "Charlie Chip" become more familiar to the public, however, a Fry's Logo with an arrow would be satisfactory. Chairperson Fox asked if anyone else would like to address the Commission and no one came forward~ Chairperson Fox suggested that appropriate vegetation would be adequate to cover the proposed pole stands for the sign and that the suggestion by staff to change the design to a Planning Comrais~ion Minu~es of November 24~ 1992 6 columnar element was not necessary. Further, Chairperson Fox stated that the directional sign detail does not need to be continued to January t 2, 1993, that he would be satisfied to have the Site and Architectural Review Committee review the detail. Commissioner Meyer-Kennedy asked for clarification relating to traffic circulation on Salmar Avenue. Mr. Piasecki stated that Public Works is looking at re-striping the lanes to add another north- bound lane dedicated to freeway access. Commissioner Meyer-Kennedy asked if landscaping or parking would be lost and Mr~ Piasecki indicated that it would not. Ms. Joan Bollier informed the Commission that the City is applying for State funding for the next fiscal year, in order to make necessary street improvements. Commissioner Meyer-Kennedy stated that she was uncomfortable with approving ~reeway- oriented signs. Commissioner Wilkins echoed these concerns, adding that the height is extreme. He was appreciative that the City Council would be making the final decision. Commissioner Alne indicated that the applicant had made a reasonable request and pointed out that his request is in keeping with similar signs in the area. He asked that the applicant not be required to provide a mock-up of the sign, since sta~s presentation appears valid, and a mocbup as described by Mr. Piasecki may pose safety hazards. Chairperson Fox supported a freeway-oriented sign with trees or vegetation planted at the base instead of the suggested columns. He supported the rest of the sign program except for the directional signs, which should return to the Site and Architectural Review Committee. Commissioner Wilkinson argued that the freeway sign may create a precedent, and asked the Commission to take a second look at this potential~ On motion of Commissioner Perrine, seconded by Commissioner Wilkinson the Public Hearing was unanimously dosed MOTIOP~ Commissioner Perrine~ moved to adopt Resolution No. 2830, revommending that O'ty Council approve the ~oriented sign and that d~ails of the sign be specified Mr. Heath Waklee, concerned citizen, asked that there be additions to the motion and Chairperson Fox remir~ded Mr. Waklee that the Public Hearing had been closed. ~,lanni#.z... C..ommission Mi?tez of Novem.~. r..2. 4. .1992 . . . . ..., .... , ,, ? There being no objections ~rom the Commission, Chairperson Fox re opened the Public Hearing. Mr. Heath Waklee, 1433 Patio Drive, asked if the Commission would consider limiting the illumination of the freeway-oriented sign to the hours of operation, that the illumination not flash or blink; that wattage be specified; and that the illumination be limited to one color. On motion of Commissioner Meyer-Kennedy, seconded by Commissioner Wilkinson, the Public Hearing was unanimously dosed. MOTION.. AYES. NOES: ABSENK.. On motion of Commissioner Perrine, seconded by Commissioner Alne, Resolution No. 2830 was adopted recommending that City Council consider a free~tzy-oriented sign, de~ails to be worked out at its meeting of D~cember 7, 1992, upon recommendation of the &'re and Architectural Review Committee, that findings have been made that support the freeway oriented sign; and, that of the Conditions of Approval be amended, as follow~' a) Condition No. 3: add: "The intensity of illumination shall be specified before installation; neither the background nor the letters of the sign shall blink or be othe~e animated." b) Add Condition No. 6: "Applicant shall devdop a landscape plan to plant the understory of the sign, unanimously carriea~ by the following roll call vot~ Commissioners: Commissioners: Commissioner:. Perrine, Wilkinson, Aln~ Fox Y yer-Kenn dy Higgins On motion of Commissioner Perrine, seconded by Commissioner Alne, the wall mounted and monument signs were unanimously approved, and the directional signs shall be revi~ by the Site and Architectural Rew'ew Committee prior to returning to the Planning Commission on January 12, 1993,(5-0-1) Commissioner Higgins being absent. Chairperson Fox read the application into the record Item No. 4 M 92-03 (S 70-19): Continued Public Hearing to consider the application of Mr. Nelson Hilger, on behalf of Bakers Square, for approval of a modification to a previously Site and Architectural Permit to allow an addition and remodel to an existing restaurant on property located at 1461 West Campbell Avenue, in a Planniaz Co, mmission, Minufes of Novem,~r 24, 199,2 ,, ........ 8 C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District~ Director of Planning, Mr. Steve Piasecki, presented the staff report dated Novernber 24, 1992, noting the following: The applicant's request is to remodel and add on 500 square l~eet to the existing Bakers Square Restaurant, and approximately 72 seats. * The applicant presented a parking study illustrating that adequate parking is available to support the additional seats. Staff is not requesting additional parking spaces at this time. * Staff is concerned about the previous submittal for building design. * Staff will recommend approval with a minor alteration to the proposed burgundy awning and trim element at the top of the mansard roof. Staff is recommending elimination of the burgundy trim. * Staff is further recommending that landscaping be done adjacent to the building and that trees be provided the parking area with tree wells~ Chairperson Fox opened the Public Hearing. Mr. Nelson Hilger, applicant, 62t Nichleson, addressed the Commission requesting support and expressing concerns with Conditions of Approval. He discussed the following: * Bakers Square is attempting to create a dinner-style atmosphere at this location. * The desire to draw attention to the restaurant with the trim element an attempt to save the restaurant which is currently failing * Although, Staff reports that the applicant is requesting an addition of 72 seats, our request is for an additional 54. * Staff has met with the applicant on several occasions and numerous requests have been made. * Landscaping will be maintained and any damage caused by construction will be replaced. However, staff request that tree wells and addition of trees to the shopping center is unreasonable. The tenant does not have authority to relandscape the center, and does not have the money to do so. * Relative to concrete bumper guards for cars, recommended by staff, our lease does not include the parking area. Agreed to provide trastq containers, however, was concerned about the legality o~ self-closing gates, as requested by staff~ * Concern about a condition being imposed by staff would require the applicant to provide underground utilities for the entire shopping center. Commissioner Alne asked about the viability of the existing restaurant. Mr. Don Seabrace, representing Bakers Square, noted that three other Bakers Square restaurants have been remodeled within the area, and has resulted in an increase in income. Further, he pointed out that the occupancy requirement imposed by the Fire Marsi~al is in error since the restaurant used to have seating for t 74 and the current proposal is for t60 /Plannin~ Commission. Minutes o£ November' 24. 1992 ~ ,,,, , ........... ,~ , 9 We are requesting that Condition No. 14 be eliminated or changed to reflect the requested seating Commissioner Meyer-Kennedy asked about the self-closing gate for the trash area. Commissioner Wilkinson suggested that the wording be changed to require a safety gate, rather than a self-closing gate. Chairperson Fox was supportive of this recommendation and added that unless the request for a self-closing gate is included in the Fire Code, this conditions should be changed Commissioner Perrine asked why staff is requesting that the applicant provide underground utilities. Mr~ Piasecki suggested that Public Works would like to impose this condition. Ms. Joan Bollier, City Engineer, Public Works, indicated that the condition for underground utilities is a standard condition added by the Planning Department. Chairperson Fox suggested that the wording be changed to require underground utilities be provided only for the restaurant site. Further, that the requirement for handicapped parking be limited to parking in front of the restaurant only. Chairperson Fox asked Mr. Piasecki wh~' the applicant should provide trees and tree wells for the entire shopping center. Mr. Piasecki indicated that staff would be satisfied if the applicant planted two trees in the existing planters along the restaurant site. Chairperson Fox suggested that staff's request outlined on page 3 of the staff report, third paragraph, sentence three, be eliminated. Likewise, he requested the t%llowing changes: Finding for Approval No. 3, the word upgrade be eliminated. * Condition of Approval No. 3, eliminate the last sentence requiring the applicant to provide tree wells. Relative to Condition No. 7, drop the request for a self-closing gate and reword the sentence to state: "Unless otherwise noted, enclosures shall consist ol~ a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence in compliance with the City's Fire Code. * Condition of Approval No. 9, add the words "on-site only" before the word "as required.' Mr. Seabrace asked that the request for concrete bumper guards be eliminated, since it would cost the restaurant $12,500. C~airperson Fox continued: Condition No~ 4 be modified al: sentence 2: "Parking spaces in ~ront of the restaurant, between the two bays only, be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. MOl-ION: On motion of Commissioner Perrine, seconded by Commissioner Wilkinson, the Public Hearing was unanimously closed. Planning Commission Minutes o( November 24.~, t992 ....... , .,, , , 1,0, On motion of Commissioner Wilkinson, seconded by Commissioner Meyer- Kennedy, Resolution No. 2831, was adopted approving M 92-03, with the following modiffwations: Finding No. 3, eliminate the word upgrade; Condition No. 3, eliminate the last sentence requiring the applicant o provide tree zoells in the parking area and to provide trees,. Condition No. 4, change the last sentence to read' "Parking spaces in front of the restaurant, ~ the two bays, be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards; Condition No. 7, modify the last sentence to read. "... or fence in compliance with the City of Camp~l's Fire CO&;" Condition No. 9, change to rma~' "Undergro~ utilities to be provided on the restaurant site only, as required by Section 20.36.150..." Motion carried by the following roll call vot< AYE X' Commissioner~' NOE X' Commissionetx. ABSENt.- Commissioner:. Perrine, Meyer-Kennedy, Wilkinson, Aln~ Fox None Higgins REPORT OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR: The Commission accepted the written report of the Planning Director. Upon suggestion from the Planning Director, Chairperson Fox informed the Commission that he would be appointing members ol~ the Planning Commission to the San Tomas Area Task Force~ Commissioner Meyer-Kennedy volunteered to serve on the Committee. It was suggested by the Director o~ Planning that Landscape and Architectural Advisors be re- appointed for the 1993 calendar year. Mr. Piasecki in~-ormed the Commission of a Joint Study Session between the City Council and Planning Commission being scheduled l%r December 15, 1992, at 6:00 p.m, at the Community Center, to discuss landuse and transportation impacts. Commissioner Wilkinson noted that due to a previous commitment, he could not be present. Mr~ Piasecki noted the Planning Commissioner vacancy created when Commissioner Dougherty became a City Councilmember. He indicated that the position would be advertised in early Janua~' 1993. Mr. Piasecki, responding to a question from Commissioner Meyer-Kennedy, stated that the new business recently opened which teaches yoga classes will require a use permit for the yoga classes and that the business is emphasizing retail sales. Planninv Commission Minvtes o£ Novembe~ 2,4~ 1,99~ .......... Chairperson Fox thanked Mr~ Joe Raineri, Assistant City Attorney, for his presence at this meeting, due to ttne absence of Mr. William Seligmann ADJOURNMENT: The Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m., to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting o1: December 8, t 992, in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 70 North First Street, Campbell~ California Respectfully Submitted by: ~(-f-~ffgg~ ( Karon Shab~P, eporting Secretary St~''' '~3 Piasecl~i, Secretai~ Plan~.ing Commission..Mintttes of ~ember 24.~ 1992 .12