PC Min 01/09/1990PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
7:30 P.M.
CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS
TUESDAY
JANUARY 9, 1990
MINUTES
The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular
session in the City Hall Council Chambers, 70 North First Street, Campbell, and
the following proceedings were had to wit:
ROLL CALL
Commissioners Present:
Chairperson Olszewski
Commissioner Jay Perrine
Commissioner Jane Meyer
Commissioner David Fox
Commissioner I. (Bud) Alne
Commissioner Ronald Christ
Commissioner Mark Wilkinson
Commissioners Absent:
None.
Staff Present:
Planning Department Director, Steve Piasecki
Planner I, Gloria Sciara
City Engineer, Bill Helms
City Attorney, William Seligmann
Reporting Secretary, Karon Shaban
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES - December 12, 1989.
On motion of Commissioner Alne, seconded by Commissioner Meyer, it was
unanimously ordered that the Minutes of December 12, 1989, be approved, as
submitted.
COMMUNICATIONS
Planning Director Piasecki informed the Commission that communications received
by the Planning Department prior to the mailing of the Commission packets were
included in the Commission packets and pertain to items listed on the agenda.
Further, he stated that two additional items were received,
distributed, as follows:
and were
Letter dated January 8, 1990, from Joan E. Regan, regarding Item No. 5,
S 89-14, Marvin Bamburg.
Letter dated January 9, 1990, from Jeffery and Patricia Wieland, 1770
Regina Way, regarding Item No. 7, ZC 89-09/PD 89-22 Cosimo an4 Angle
Giancola.
ORAL REQUESTS
There were no oral requests.
January 9, 1990 - 2 - 'lning Commission Minutes
PRESENTATIONS
1. Chairperson Olszewski Presentation of gavel to Commissioner Perrine
Chairperson Olszewski noted events occurring while he served as Chairperson of
the City of Campbell's Planning Commission, as follows:
- New Commissioners and Staff
- New Commissioner Manual
- Initiation of Study Sessions
- 190 Applications heard
- Downtown Development Study
- Reviewed Housing and Circulation Element
- General Plan and Zoning reviews
Chairperson Olszewski presented the gavel to Commissioner Perrine, declaring
him the new Chairperson of the Planning Commission, and expressed appreciation
to Staff and fellow Commissioners for their support during his service.
Chairperson Perrine proceeded with the written agenda.
2. Staff
Introduction of Architectural and Landscape
Advisors
Director Piasecki provided a brief overview of the voluntary positions held by
Ed Janke, the Architectural Advisor and Susan Landry, the Landscape Advisor to
the Commission.
Susan Landry shared a colored aerial photograph of the Bay Area and noted
existing green areas, requesting that the Commission pause and reflect upon the
future relative to the environment. She noted the mark that will be made upon
the City of Campbell by this effort. Further, she expressed her appreciation
for being given the opportunity serve the Commission in this way.
Mr. Ed Janke did not arrive until 9:35 p.m.
3. City Manager
Presentation of the "State of the City"
City Manager Kevin Duggan commended the outgoing Chairperson and new
Chairperson.
He provided an overall view of the State of the City for 1989 and plans for
1990, touching upon the following issues:
- Completion of the Transportation Analysis
- Summary Mission and Values Statement
- Fiscal Year 1988/89 and major goals for Fiscal Year 1990/91
- Budget - $18 million Budget - and initiation of a Two-Year Plan
- The Capital Improvement Plan
- Revenues - sales tax and property tax
- Public Services - maximize quality service
- Facilities - maintain existing facilities
- Review infrastructure to meet future needs
- Major accomplishments for 1989 - Los Gatos Creek Trail extension to
Planning Commission Minute - 3 - ~nuary 9, 1990
Campbell, 900 East Hamilton Avenue Project.
- Sharmon Palms Rehabilitation Plan
- Downtown General Plan
- Water Conservation efforts
- Emergency Preparedness Plan
- Park improvements
- DARP Program
- Computer sized traffic model
- Community Center Master Plan
- Ainsley Project
- Curb-side recycling
- Comprehensive analysis of City fees and charges
- Census
Mr. Duggan informed the Commission of the Advisory Board training session to be
held on January 29, 1990, at the Community Center and requested that the
Commissioners attend. Further, he noted he would make himself available to the
Commission should the Commission request his presence.
4. Redevelopment Agency
Discussion of the North of Campbell Avenue Community
meeting, scheduled of January 17, 1990.
Robert Kass, Director, Redevelopment Agency, provided an informational
discussion relative to the North of Campbell Avenue Community meeting, noting
that the meeting will be informal in nature and that it will provide an
opportunity for Commissioners to receive input from members of the public. He
noted the following items that will be addressed at the meeting:
- Fiscal issues
- Land Use recommendation for the Page/Salmar area
- Entryway to the downtown area
- Alignment of Salmar Avenue
- Land Use designations
Chairperson Perrine initiated a new procedure for Public Hearings which would
allow the applicant to present his proposal after the Staff Report,
subsequently, the Site and Architectural Review Committee Report, and opening
of the Public Rearing.
5. S 89-14
Bamburg, M.
· · ·
Continued Public Hearing to consider the application
of Mr. Marvin Bamburg for Site and Architectural
approval to allow construction of a professional
office building on properties known as 1830 and 1836
East Hamilton Avenue and 1670 Grace Avenue, in a PO
(Professional Office) Zoning District.
Chairperson Perrine read Application No. S 89-14 into the record.
Gloria Sciara, Planner I, presented the Staff Report dated January 9, 1990,
noting that the proposed development was designed to blend into the
neighborhood, that opposition has been expressed from the applicant and
residents of the area regarding the width of the sidewalks, and that the
Architectural Advisor met with the applicant and revised the elevations.
Commissioner Alne asked why the ten foot wide sidewalk was requested.
Planning Commission Minutes - ~i - ~nuary 9, 1990
Bill Helms, City Engineer, stated that ten foot sidewalks are a matter of
ordinance for commercial developments, however, he noted, that Staff would
provide flexibility on this matter and will reduce the width, if requested by
the Commission.
Chairperson Perrine reviewed the letter from Joan Regan, spokesperson for the
neighborhood, stating opposition to the ten foot sidewalk width, and requested
that the applicant address the Commission.
Mr. Marvin Bamburg, on behalf of the applicant, noted, the following:
- neighborhood and the applicant would benefit by increased landscaping
if the sidewalks were narrower
- there was adequate parking at the site
- requested approval of the application
- requested Commission grant him an 18 month development schedule, since
the timeline for obtaining a building permit was a concern.
Commissioner Meyer presented the Site and Architectural Review Committee
Report, noting that the Committee recommended approval, with the Conditions of
Approval amended to allow five foot sidewalk widths.
In response to Commissioner Christ's question regarding existing sidewalks and
Staff concerns relating to reduction of the requested ten feet, Mr. Helms
informed the Commission that a commercial area necessitates greater sidewalk
width.
Mr. Helms cautioned the Commission regarding narrower sidewalk width by noting:
- closeness of the curb
- tree wells in the sidewalk area
- streetlight, fire hydrants and power poles in walking areas
- 71/2 foot sidewalk would provide a five foot clear walking area
- requirement that a minimum of clear sidewalk area be provided for the
handicapped.
In response to Commissioner Alne's question regarding width of existing
sidewalks to the curbs, Mr. Helms stated that they were currently 41/2 feet.
Chairperson Perrine opened the Public Hearing on S 89-14.
Mr. Marvin Bamburg readdressed the Commission to discuss street trees,
indicating their location on the maps displayed in the Council Chambers.
Chairperson Perrine requested that Mr. Piasecki summarize the letter from Joan
Regan.
Mr. Piasecki summarized the letter noting two comments, as follows:
- preferred the sidewalks be six foot in width or narrower
- favored the proposal
Mr. Frank Riley, speaking on behalf of the residents in the area, requested
that the sidewalks blend with the current six foot sidewalks currently existing
on Grace Avenue providing for more landscaped areas.
Planning Commission IV ~tes - 5 - Tanuary 9, 1990
On motion of Commissioner Olszewski, seconded by Co~missioner Christ, it was
unanimously ordered that the Public Hearing on S S9-14 ~e closed.
M/S:
Christ, Meyer
That the Planning Commission Adopt the attached
findings; grant a Negative Declaration, which has
been p[epared for this project; adopt'!'~lation
2&4~,.~ecommending Site and ArchitectU~l approval
to ceastruct~a professionai;~iCe kll~i~, s~bject
to the attached Conditions of APproval, amended to
allow sidewalk width to be consistent with existing
sidewalks south of the driveway; and, that the
Development Schedule be extended for an 18 month
p~riod.
Commissioner Meyer requested a friendly amendment to request that City Council
investigate the possibility of lessening the 71/2 foot sidewalk requirement
between the driveway and the residential area.
Commissioner Christ was opposed to the suggested amendment and reminded the
Commission of the handicap requirement. He requested that when unique
situations warrant greater flexibility regarding sidewalk width, that Staff
look at those situations.
Commissioner Meyer acknowledged Mr. Christ's concerns.
Discussion on motion:
Commissioner Alne commended the Applicant on his efforts to accommodate the
citizens of Grace Avenue and noted his support of the motion.
Commissioner Olszewski noted his support of the motion was based upon the
following:
- no impact on the existing magnolia trees
- applicant amenable to providing more parking, if necessary
- provision of more open space
Roll call vote on motion:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
AYES-
NOES:
ABS~T:
Christ, Fox, Meyer, Olszewski, Alne, Wilkinson,
Perrine
None
None
Chairperson Perrine acknowledged Mr. Ed Janke, Architectural Advisor, who
arrived during discussion of the last item.
Director Piasecki introduced Mr. Janke to the Commission.
Mr. Janke expressed appreciation for being selected for the City's
Architectural Advisor.
Chairperson Perrine moved the agenda to Item No. 9, in consideration of the
Project Architect, Kurt Anderson, who brought his infant child.
Planning Commission Minutes - 6 - "naury 9, 1990
9. $C
~'I~'D 89-23
Public Hearing to consider the application of
Mr. J~s Wong fo~ approval of a Zone Change from
R-M-S (Multiple-Family Residential) to PD (Planned
Development); and, approval of a Planned Development
Permit, plans, elevations and development schedule
to allow the construction of four townhomes on
property known as ~?~l~o~h C~at~&l ~venue, in an
R-M-S (Low-Medium Density Residential) Zoning
District.
Chairperson Perrine read the application into the record.
Director Piasecki presented the Staff Report, dated January 9, 1990, noting the
number of units, location, size, zoning designation and density. Concerns
raised by Staff were noted relative to drainage of project site, the proposed
color scheme and retention of existing trees.
Mr. Helms, City Engineer, stated that as much as 2 feet of fill would be
needed in the back of the lot, and indicated that sub-pumps could provide
drainage. He noted Staff concerns regarding the use of fill was that it would
impact retention of existing trees and elevate the "B" units higher; and
requested that if the Commission chose the fill option, Staff would recommend
that the applicant provide tree cluster landscaping to screen the courtyard
area.
He noted that if the Commission chooses the option of using sub-pumps then
Staff would recommend that the applicant move the rear "B" units farther a part
providing the following:
- courtyard atmosphere
- additional landscaping
- two additional guest parking spaces
Commissioner Olszewski asked about the adequacy of the parking and if
landscaping were being compromised to provide for the additional spaces.
Mr. Piasecki pointed out the location of suggested trees and existing trees on
the site plans displayed.
Commissioner Fox explained that the Site and Architectural Review Committee had
reviewed the application and it was felt that:
- the existing tree of concern was of middle age
- it branched out at the bottom
- a boxed tree with a canopy shape would be preferred in the front area
- this tree could easily be moved to the rear of the property
- if fill were used, the project would be two feet higher
Discussion ensued relating to existing trees and the site plan.
Mr. Kurt Anderson, Architect, addressed the Commission and requested approval
and noted that the applicant would prefer to leave the site at the current
elevation retaining existing trees on the perimeter and providing additional
trees on the interior of the project.
Commissioner Olszewski requested that the Architect explain how the
architectural design would intergrade with the neighborhood.
Planning Commission Minute~
-7 -
January 9, 1990
Mr. Anderson explained that:
- Victorian designed home is similar to those existing
- porch elements were added
- similar parking areas were designed
Commissioner Meyer expanded on Site and Architectural comments, noting that the
Committee recommended approval.
Commissioner Olszewski asked about the location of the trash enclosures and
requested that Staff ensure that future site plans include description and
location of trash enclosures, since the City Manager had informed the
Commission of the new curb-side recycling policy being initiated in the City.
Chairperson Perrine opened the Public Hearing on ZC 89-17/PD 89/21.
Mr. Deven Thurston, area resident, expressed the following:
- support for the project
- concern regarding the narrowness of the street
- requested that the applicant provide on-site parking to lessen the
impact of street parking
- opposition to the use of fill
Mr. Kurt Anderson respectfully reguested Commission approval of the.project.
Commissioner Meyer noted that Condition No. 2, on the attached Conditions of
Approval should state that the color scheme be returned to the Site and
Architectural Review Committee.
M/S : Meyer, Christ Motion to close the Public Hearing was unanimously
approved.
~: Meyer, Christ Motion recommending that City C0~ncil accept the
..~+]~egati~e Declaration which was prepared for this project; m~(l~t ReloXutJ. on NO..}~
~2'649 i~corporating the attached findings recommending that City Council approve
the Zone Change from R-M-S to PD; and, a~oP~I~ b~'~u~:.loR No. 2G50, f~corporating
the attached findings, recommending that City Council approve the P~anned
Development Permit for this project, subject to the attached conditions,
amending conditions as redlined, retaining all existing healthy trees not
impacting the footprint of the building or garages; and, requiring that the
color scheme and the drainage concerns return to Staff and the Site and
Architectural Review Committee.
Roll Call Vote on Motion:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Christ, Fox, Meyer, Olszewski, Alne, Wilkinson,
Perrine
None.
None.
Discussion:
Commissioner Christ asked at what point would the Public Works Department
inform the applicant that his application would have to return to the Planning
Commission.
Planning Commission Minutes - 8 - ~]anuary ~, 1990
Mr. Helms stated that if Public Works Staff found that conditions, as
designated by the Commission were not met, then they would notify the Planning
Director and when the application returned to the Commission for tentative map
approval, the Director would provide a report recommending modifications.
Further, he stated that if the applicant and Staff reach an impasse, then the
applicant clearly cannot proceed unless he returns to the Commission with
revised plans.
Commissioner Christ commented that this application demonstrates that there are
creative opportunities for development in the downtown areas.
6. S 89-05
~eal & Litle
Continued Public Hearing to consider the
application
of Mr. James Neal and Gene Litle for approval of a
applic%~t? .... the
Site and Architectural allow
construction of single-story ~! ~A~ng, on
property known as 2205 South N~mter BC~ulevard,
in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning di6trict.
The Chairperson read Application No. S 89-05 into the record.
Director Piasecki presented the Staff Report, dated January 9, 1990, noting
that the applicant requested a two week continuance to January 23, 1990, and
that Staff recommends approval of the continuance.
Commissioner Meyer reported that the Applicant met with the Site and
Architectural Review Committee and that the Committee recommends a continuance
so that the Applicant can address architectural concerns.
Chairperson Perrine opened the Public Hearing on S 89-05.
M/S : Christ, Fox Motion to close the Public Hearing on S
unanimously approved 7-0-0.
M/S : Christ, Fox
89-05 was
Motion to continue S 89-05 to the Planning
Commission meeting of January ~, 1990, unanimously
carried 7-0-0. ~,~
The Planning Commission recessed at 9:15 p.m., and reconvened at 9:35 p.m.,
with all Commissioners present.
7...:~~9 Public Hearing to consider the application of
PD 89-22 Cosimo and Angle Giancola for approval of Zone
Oi&l~-ola, A. Change from R-l-9 (Single-Family Residential) to PD
(Planned Development); and a play,element
Permit to subdivide .55 acres i~ ~' ~ts on
~opez~y known as 1253 Ba~z~et Avenue. ~
The Chairperson read Application No. ZC 89-09/PD 89-22 into the record.
Planning Commission Minutes - 9 - January 9, 1990
Director Piasecki reviewed the background of the current request and present
status, noting the following:
- September 12, 1989, Planning Commission action denying the application
for a Zone Change from R-l-9 to R-l-6, noting inconsistency with the
San T0mas Policy.
- October 3, 1989, City Council meeting where Council concurred with the
intent of the San Tomas Policy and that a ZC to R-1-6 would
potentially set a precedent.
- city Council directing the Applicant to change the application to a PD
with the stipulation that lots be equal in size and not 'over built.'
-consistent with the General Plan
- Not consistent with the zoning designation
- Applicant's modifications
- approval recommended by Staff
In response to a question from Commissioner Olszewski, City Attorney Seligmann
stated that in order to construct a new building in a Planned Development zone,
you must have a Planned Development Permit.
Commissioner 01szewski queried relative to the words new vs. existing buildings
in the PD Ordinance.
Commissioner Alne explained that the Applicant built two houses on a common-lot
in his previous plan, which was Consistent with the San Tomas Policy and there
was no Planned Development Permit request Further, he noted that the Applicant
would like a Planned Development for the common-lot under a different set of
rules.
Commissioner Christ raised questions regarding wording "existing and new" and
PD regulations.
Discussion ensued between Commissioners relative to the PD use and Director
Piasecki noted that the Council felt that the uniqueness of the situation and
the configuration of the homes on this lot would be consistent with those in
the area.
Commissioner Fox noted that the Applicant created the uniqueness and the
configuration, and that was reason enough for denial.
Co~lnissioner Wilkinson stated that if it was the intent of the Applicant from
the beginning to subdivide the lot, then it is clear that the Applicant should
have requested the PD at the onset of construction and there would be no new or
existing buildings to consider.
Commissioner Christ expressed confusion regarding whether the City Council
intended to direct the Commission to approve an "after-the-fact" PD, and he
expressed concern regarding setting a precedent.
Mr. James Riley, Project Architect, informed the Commission that the use of a
PD for this project would enable the Commission to vary conditions, i.e., the
35 percent building overage. He stated that the applicant is amendable to
these conditions.
Commissioner Alne asked Mr. Giancola, the property owner, if it was his
intention when he built the homes that they would remain on an undivided
common-lot; why a PD was not requested before beginning the construction; and
was it possible, legally, to subdivide into three lots at that time.
Planning Commission Minutes · - 10 - January' 9, 1990
Mr. John Giancola responded by stating that:
- three years ago he had attempted to divide the lot with an %xisting
home into three parcels and that the City's requirement to provide
sidewalks and bring storm drains up to City standards, he opted to
build only one house
- the cost to comply was too great at the time
- he would comply with requests regarding the 35 percent rule
- he intends to build a one-story residence.
- the San Tomas Policy was adopted in 1982 and that he built his second
house in 1984, since he could not subdivide
Chairperson Perrine noted that a three-lot split was possible at the previous
construction approval.
Lengthy discussion ensued relating to: - intention of the Applicant
- San Tomas policy and when implemented
- surrounding lot sizes
- possibility of granting a variance
- definition and differences between an ordinance and a policy
- uses of a Planned Development zoning
Director Piasecki pointed out that a Planned Development zone would enable the
Commission to impose findings to control the house size.
Commissioner Alne indicated that he would prefer approving a variance, 'since he
could not justify an "after-the-fact" PD.
The variance was defined by the City Attorney who noted that a variance could
be granted if certain conditions or hardships exist that were not self-imposed
by the applicant.
Commissioner Meyer requested clarification regarding available space for a
third house.
Mr. Piasecki noted a 7,000 square foot gap where a third house could be
constructed; and reaffirmed that a PD represented an opportunity for the
Commission to impose special conditions for flexibility and control.
Commissioner Alne reviewed that the Applicant was aware of the rules when he
began construction of the first house and that the Applicant now requests to
deviate for hardship under a different set of rules.
The Applicant stated that he just wanted another lot.
Commissioner Meyer reported relative to the Site and Architectural Review
meeting noting that the current proposal was considered and that the Committee
concurred with Staff's recommendation to approve the request.
In response to questions for Commissioners, Mr. Piasecki noted the following:
- the proposed house would be limited to 2600 square foot floor area
- no plan for the house has been submitted
- Condition No. 1 requiring the applicant to record a covenant
- if the PD were approved, the applicant would have to return to the
Commission for Site and Architectural approval.
Planning Commission Minutes - 11 - Tanuary 9, 1990
Chairperson Perrine opened the Public Rearing on ZC 89-09/PD 89-22.
wished to speak at this time.
No one
Commissioner Wilkinson related that he felt that there was consensus between
Commissioners to apply the San Tomas Policy.
Chairperson Perrine pointed out that the Commission is allowed to make
exceptions to Policy.
Commissioner Christ asked if the ordinance would allow a developer to come
into a non-conforming lot and develop it.
Mr. Piasecki stated that if the non-conforming lot is a legal lot of record and
at the time it is considered a buildable lot, a reasonable use of property is
considered.
Further, Mr. Piasecki noted the following issues relating to the Council
referral that:
- the proposed construction configuration is consistent with semi-rural
developments in the area
- they directed the Applicant to return to the Commission with a
redeveloped plan
- Staff's recommendation was for denial
- City Council feels there is room for deviation
- if these lots are maintained at 9000 square feet, they cannot be
developed
Commissioner Christ asserted that after review he could not recommend approval
of a PD, and he expressed concern that the City Council has taken his role and
that in good conscience he could not approve a PD as a Planning Commissioner,
due to future possible repercussions.
Commissioner Olszewski referred to the letter distributed before the meeting
and requested a summary.
Planning Director Piasecki summarized the letter to the Commission from Jeffery
J. Wieland and Patricia A. Wieland, Regina Way, Campbell, by stating that the
neighborhood's quality of life and uniqueness were being jepordized; that the
Applicants consciously skirted current zoning; that it is an intrusion of
privacy, and request denial of the proposal.
Further discussed weze:
- who initiated the 35 percent rule and where it came from
- real measurements of the lot sizes and what they would be if divided
equally
M/S :
Olszewski, Meyer
Motion to close the Public Rearing unanimously
carried 7-0-0.
Commissioner Olszewski noted he would not support the request for a PD since
the ordinance does not meet the requirement for zoning, and that approval of
the request would place the PD process in danger.
More discussion regarding specific language and requirements for a variance
approval was entertained.
Planning Commission Minutes - 12 - January 9, 1990
Commissioner Alne reaffirmed his opposition for approval of the PD and
expressed concern that the problems that exist are problems of the applicant's
own making.
.~: Alne, Olszewski Moti~?~:ae:nY Application+~o. $¢ 89-99/PD 89-~2,
corporating findings that 1) that the application does not dOes not fall
under the definition of PD Zoning, 2) that it is not harmonious with the San
Tomas Policy.
Commissioner Alne had requested that the Applicant return to the Commission
with a variance application and hardship conditions that are acceptable.
Commissioner Olszewski requested that those comments be noted and pointed out
that there are not planned development plans available for the Commission to
review.
Commissioner Alne stated that his request regarding a the applicant's pursuit
of a variance was intended to be a message to the Council that the Commission
was not merely rejecting the application without the consideration of
alternatives.
Commissioner Meyer reviewed other options with Staff, as follows:
PD Zoning
- variance
- conventional zoning
When she asked about whether the Applicant could easily prove a hardship, and
Mr. Piasecki stated that he did not believe that the Applicant would be able to
prove a hardship, Commission Meyer, stated her opposition to the motion. She
stated that since the City Council had suggested that the Applicant apply for a
PD in order to maintain control over the project, she felt it was necessary to
approve the application.
Director Piasecki cautioned the Commission relative to giving the Applicant a
misguided message regarding his ability to obtain a variance, that a variance
would be very difficult for the Applicant to obtain.
Commissioner Christ noted his support for the motion.
Commission Wilkinson noted his support for the motion and his feeling that two
lots at this location is very appealing.
Chairperson Pe£rine stated that he sees this specific application as a unique
situation, and that using the PD as a tool in times like this is appropriate.
He will not support the motion.
Roll Call Vote on Motion
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Christ, Fox, Olszewski, Alne, Wilkinson
Meyer, Perrine
None.
S. UP S9-29 ' Public Bearing to consider the application of Mr.
Planning Commission Minutes - 13 - ~ nuary 9, 1990
i?.~~ Costallo~ on behalf of Velway Inc., for
approval of an off-sale liquor license in
conjunction with a liquor store operation, located
on property known as 23~5 SOuth Wl~eater
Boulevard, in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning~
District.
Chairperson Perrine read Application No. UP 89-29 into the record.
Gloria Sciara, Planner I, presented the Staff Report, dated January 9, 1990,
noting that the applicant was moving his store to a nearby location and that
the requirement for a use permit for liquor occurs any time you relocate and
that the previous business did not have a use permit.
Commissioner Alne asked where other liquor licensed operations are in the
surrounding areas.
Ms. Sciara stated that there are three in this large development.
MR. Frank Velo, President of Velway Inc., requested approval of the Use Permit
and noted his type 21 license which has been in effect for a 20 years and that
the store is only relocating 80 feet away.
Commissioner Olszewski raised the question regarding the retention of Mr.
Velo's existing sign, which he noted that he has enjoyed over the years.
Mr. Velo stated that he understands that the sign will have to be replaced, but
that he would keep it, if permitted to do so.
Chairperson Perrine opened the Public ~earing on UP 89-29.
address the Commission.
No one wished to
M/S: Fox, Meyer
M/S:
Meyer, Wilkinson
Motion to close the Public Hearing unanimously
carried 7-0-0. ~ % ~ ....
Motion to Adopt ~S~~ NO. 2~52~ incorporating
the attached findi~a, al~rovin~ the applicant's
request for aa:~f'lale liquor ~icense, in
conjunction with a general store operation, carried
by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Christ, Fox, Meyer, Olszewski, Alne, Wilkinson,
Perrine
None
None
10. S 99-15
~hr.ader, D.
Public Hearing to consider the application of Mr.
David R. Schrader, on behalf of Sanco Pipelines
Inc., f~r ~ite and Architectural approval for
outdoo~!!!!B~°ra~e yard on ~roperty known as 251 ~
inca M-1-S (Light-Industrial Z6ning
District.
Chairperson Perrine read S 89-15 into the record.
Planning Commission Minutes - 14 - nuary 9, 1990
Gloria Sciara, Planner I, presented the Staff Report, dated January 9, 1990,
noting that Staff is recommending approval and requesting additional on-site
landscaping, designated parking spaces and material storage be indicated on the
site plan
MS. Sciara reviewed Condition No. 11 of the Conditions of Approval with
Commissioner Christ who requested that the word "racks" be added as follows:
"Storage racks, supplies and materials not to exceed the fence height.
Bruce Johnson, of Sanco Pipelines, Inc., offered to answer questions for the
Commission and responded to Commissioner Christ concern by stating that Sanco
Pipeline is in the business of installing pipe and not storing it, that the
request was for leftover pipe from various jobs and storage area between jobs.
Commissioner Olszewski requested that redwood slats for fencing materials be
substituted with durable (non-breakable) material, and Mr. Johnson was amenable
to the suggestion.
Commissioner Meyer reported relative to the Site and Architectural Review
Committee noting landscaping and fences were discussed and that the Committee
recommended approval.
Chairperson Perrine opened the Public Hearing on S 89-15. No one wished to
speak.
M/S : Olszewski, Fox Motion to close the Public Hearing unanimously
carried 7-0-0.
M._~_~ : Olszewski, Wilkinson MOtiOn to adopt the attached findings, accept the
Negative Declaration, adopt Resolutio~ No. 2653 appr~ing the request for an
outdoor storage yard, subject to the attached conditions, amended to include
that the fence screening material be made of non-breakable material, and that
Condition No. 11 be amended to add the word rack unanimously carried with the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Christ, Fox, Meyer, Olszewski, Alne, Wilkinson,
Perrine
None
None
,~shenas, A.
Public Hearing to consider the application of Mr.
Abbas Haghshenas, on behalf of Vanderson
Construction, for approval of a Planned Development
Permit to allow the construction of a storage
building, on property known aS 'iS4 South First
Street, in a PD (Planned Development/Commercial) ~
Zoning District.
The Chairperson read the application into the record.
Director Piasecki presented the Staff Report, dated January 9, 1990, noting the
Planning Commission Minutes - 15 - ,lanuary 9, 1990
site location, size of the proposed, that the Applicant is removing a water
tank and placing the building in that location, and that Staff is recommending
approval.
Mr. Richard Pardene, noted that he had met with the Site and Architectural
Committee this morning and that he is willing to comply with requests made by
the Committee and requested approval of the application.
Commissioner Meyer reported that the Committee has requested that the applicant
provide automatic irrigation, additional landscaping, and provision of a fence
along the railroad tracks.
Chairperson Perrine opened the Public Hearing on PD 89-21. No one wished to
speak.
Commissioner Olszewski initiated discussion of the fence and screening with
vines or drought resistent shrubs.
The general consensus of the Commission was that screening and landscaping
would be nice if the applicant would like to provide it.
M/S :
Olszewski, Meyer
Motion to close the Public Hearing unanimously
carried 7-0-0.
Commissioner Olszewski noted support for a motion that would be favorable to
having the Planning Director investigate landscaping along the railroad track
and the addition of three trees along the fence. The applicant was reluctant
but agreed to provide three trees along the railroad track fence.
M/S : Olszewski, Alne Motion to adopt Retol~t~otq No. 26S4, i~orporati~g
the attached findings, recommending that City
Council approve the application subject to the
attached Conditions of Approval amended to include
that the fence be screened with non-breakable
material and that three trees be planted along the
railroad track fence, carried with the following
roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES. -
ABSENT:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Christ, Fox, Meyer, Olszewski, Alne, Wilkinson,
Perrine
None
None
Public Rearing to consider addition of Text
Amendment to Campbell Municipal Code, Section
21.02.126, defining Commercial Vehicle.
The Chairperson read the application into the record.
The City Attorney, William Seligmann discussed the purpose of defining the
commercial vehicle.
Questions were raised by Commissioners regarding potential for impacting the
uses of their family pick-up trucks and requested that the City Attorney review
Planning Commission Minutes - 16 - %nuary 9, 1990
this issue.
Mr. Seligmann requested a month for the review.
The Chairperson declared the Public Hearing open. No one wished to speak.
M/S :
Olszewski, Christ
Motion to continue the Public Hearing on TA 89-03 to
the February 13, 1990, Planning Commission meeting
unanimously carried 7-0-0.
13. Staff
Topics for future City Council/Planning Commission
Study Session.
The Chairperson reviewed the application and Staff informed the Commission that
the four topics chosen by the Planning Commission for possible discussion need
to be transmitted to the City Council.
M/S :
Olszewski, Fox
Motion to transmit the four topics to the City
Council for discussion at the joint meeting with the
City Council and Advisory Boards, unanimously
carried 7-0-0.
SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS
There were no subcommittee reports.
REPORT OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
The report of the Planning Director was discussed and accepted.
The Commission noted requests of the Staff, as follows: 1. The future Staff Reports include the Architectural Advisor's comments.
2. That future site plans indicate location and size of trash enclosures.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the Planning Commission meeting adjourned at
12:00 midnight, to a study session on January 17, 1990, 7:30 p.m., City Council
Chambers to discuss the North of Campbell Avenue Area Study, subsequently,
adjourning to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting on
January 23, 1990.
APPROVED:
Jay R. Perrine
Chairperson
ATTEST:
Steve Piasecki
Secretary
RECORDED:
Karon Shaban
Reporting Secretary