Loading...
PC Min 02/13/1990PLANNING ~SSlON OI?~ O[ ~~, ~l[Nlt 7:30 P.M. CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY FEBRUARY 13, 1990 The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular session in the City Hall Council Chambers, 70 North First Street, Campbell, California, and the following proceedings were had, to wit: ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Chairperson Jay Perrine Commissioner Ronald Christ Commissioner Jane Meyer Commissioner David Fox Commissioner I. (Bud) Alne Commissioner Bruce Olszewski Commissioners Absent: Staff Present: Commissioner Mark Wilkinson Director of Planning, Steve Piasecki Planner II, Tim Haley City Engineer, Bill Helms City Attorney, William Seligmann Pat Masters, Recording Secretary Chairperson Perrine announced that Commissioner Wilkinson would be absent due to prior work commitments. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES There being no corrections to the minutes of the meeting of January 23, 1990: M/S: Olszewski/Meyer Motion to approve the Planning Commission Minutes of January 23, 1990, as written carried 5-0-1-1, Co~issioner Wilkinson being absent for the entire ~--eting and Commissioner Fox abstaining due to his absence at the 1-23-90 Planning Commission meeting. pRESENTATIONS: Chairperson Perrine: Presented Commissioner Olszewski with outgoing plaque and gavel commending him for an excellent job during the previous year as Chairperson of the Planning Commission. He noted that Commissioner Olszewski not only served as Chairperson but also was a member of Mayor Ashworth's Roundtable signifying additional service to the City of Campbell. flanning Commission Minutes -2- .ebruary 13, 1990 C~CATIONS Planning Director Piasecki noted the following communications: Re: Item 3: Letter from Roger and Lorene Hughes dated 2/2/90; Re: Item 3: Letter from Andarch Associates dated 2/8/90 Re: Item 5: Letter from Dietrich von Dohlen dated 2/12/90 Om~LP~UESTS Mr. Russell Wyrick, 330 W. Campbell Ave., re: Children's Fair on March 18, 1990, and advised he would be submitting an application for a banner sign. Just wanted to introduce himself. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. TS 90-01 NADCON 2. TS 90-02 NADCON Consider the application of Mr. Steve Saray, on behalf of NADCON Development, for approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map for a previously approved Planned Development Permit to construct 16 townhomes on property known as 410 West Sunnyoaks, in a PD (Planned Development/Low-Medium-Density Residential) Zoning District. Consider the application of Mr. Steve Saray, on behalf of NADCON Development, for approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map for a previously approved Planned Development Permit to construct 6 townhomes and 3 single-family residences, on property known as 65-85 Latimer Avenue, in a Planned Development/Medium Density Residential) Zoning District. Chairperson Perrine read the applications into the record. There were no questions or discussion from either audience or Commission. A motion for the approval of the consent calendar was in order. M/S: Meyer, Christ Motion for the approval of the Consent Calendar approving TS 90-01 and TS 90-02 unanimously carried, 6-0-0-1, Comissioner WiLkinson being absent. PUBLIC ~J~RINGS 1. TS 89-07 Hodgins, B. Public Hearing to consider the request of Mr. Bruce Hodgins for a Tentative Subdivision Map to divide two lots into six lots on property known as 987 and 1113 Crockett Avenue and 1345 Westmont Avenue in an R-1 (Single-Family) Zoning District. Planning Commission Minutes -3- ~ebruary 13, 1990 Mr. Haley presented the Staff report dated February 13, 1990. Commission Discussion In answer to Commissioner Alne's question regarding communication from the architect of the project who expressed concern that the size of the proposed cul-de-sac would reduce the building envelope for the parcel fronting Westmont Avenue, Mr. Helms assured the Commission that the minor revision to the radius and width of the throat can be resolved at the staff level. The tentative map met all the ordinance requirements and the revisions can be done between the tentative and final map stages. There was concern on the part of the Commission that the proposed lot sizes were not in the spirit of the San Tomas Policy which "encouraged larger than normal" lot sizes. Mr. Haley assured the Commission that all of the lot sizes met the minim%~m R-l-6 requirements. Mr. Haley also pointed out that there had been very little development in this area over the past 30 years and that this project was more consistent with recent City-approved developments. Mr. Bruce Hodgins, the applicant, addressed the Commission noting that the property was made up of various types of structures that were built back in the 1950's. The original owner has passed away, his estate sold the properties and the applicant bought these lots with the intent of developing them into the type of development the City was looking for. Chairperson Perrine opened Public Hearing on TS 89-07. 1. Don Armstrong, 66 Christopher Ave., Campbell, expressed concern regarding traffic on Westmont and suggested that the architect extend the cul-de-sac out to Crockett Avenue. 2. Greg Linafecter, 1250 Capri Dr., Campbell, spoke in opposition of the proposal - his concern was relative to the density in the area. 3. Mike Tippets, 1553 Capri Dr., Campbell, expressed concern regarding the density and was opposed to the proposal. 4. Logan Cartright, 1664 Whitwood, Campbell, opposed the project due to the high density in the area. In response to Commissioner Olszewski's question regarding applicability of the San Tomas Policy relative to this project, the Staff stated that it was applicable relative to design, new development and compatibility with existing structures Planning Commission Miutes -4- February 13, 1990 Commissioner Fox expressed the following concerns: lay out of the cul-de-sac lots appear to be very irregular in shape · possible access problems · lot lines are convoluted · appears that a 5-lot subdivision was forced into 6 lots. Commissioner Alne raised the following questions: · how many square feet will be allocated to the adjacent 3 lots? what maximum number of square feet can be allocated and subtracted from where? · will the lots be larger after the negotiation process? will the buildable site take into account what Commissioner Fox just raised? In response, Mr. Helms stated that the precise number of square feet had not yet been determined; that the frontage road has been examined and that staff has determined that some flexibility could be allowed since not having lots fronting on one side of the cul-de-sac would dispense with a parkway strip on that side of the street so the face of the curb would be immediately adjacent to the front of the sidewalk. Mr. Helms stated that this would provide a right-of-way fence for the Water District, which would be immediately adjacent to the back of the walk, that the curb distance would be the same and that the typical 5' parkway strip on the west side would not be available. In answer to traffic concern and widening of Westmont Avenue, Mr. Helms reported this matter still uncertain at this time. Both he and Director Piasecki noted the Circulation Element of the General Plan would be reviewed in the upcoming Fiscal Year but felt that the traffic generated by this project would be minimal. 5. Molly Klupfell, 1450 Walnut Dr., Campbell, encouraged the City's development of larger than normal lot sizes and expressed concern relating to the traffic and the widening of Westmont Avenue. There were no further questions from the audience. M/S: Olszewski, Meyer Motion to close Public Hearing on TS 89-07 carried 5-1-0-1, Commissioner Christ voting no and Coemtissioner WiLkinson being absent. Commissioner Olszewski raised the concern that he saw the cul-de-sac in the wrong location. Commissioner Christ said that was why he had voted no and wanted to explore other solutions to the location of the cul-de-sac. Planning Commission Minutes -5- February 13, 1990 Commissioner Olszewski also noted that it would be difficult to visualize a harmonious neighborhood development with a cul-de-sac that would be shoved over to one side, against a creek remnant. Too much cement against cement. He also asked the Planning director if there was to be any mitigation for landscaping along the creek side? Director Piasecki said that could be a possibility - along the west side of the cul-de-sac. Commissioner Christ raised the question of why the cul-de-sac de couldn't be placed off Crockett Avenue, as opposed to Westmont · It was difficult to understand why the homes could not all face the cul-de-sac and not have any backing out onto Westmont. From a safety standpoint, it would be better to have traffic coming off one street rather than coming out of a court and a street. It would be less confusing to have a street right next to the concrete ditch. If there were a house there, with a fence up against the ditch and landscaping, it would more or less hide the ditch rather than draw attention to it - making the overall development more attractive. Director Piasecki reported that applicant had looked at all of the concerns voiced by the Commissioners and felt that fronting homes onto Westmont Avenue was not as desirable from his standpoint vs fronting homes onto quieter Crockett. However it was because of the City's specifications that he has been left with the present design. Landscaping would also take care of softening the hard cement look. If a cul-de-sac would be placed in the center of the project, then the actual yield would be 5 lots, not 6. The lot size is simply not big enough to double load the cul-de-sac efficiently. Commissioner Christ reaffirmed his position that a better layout would make better sense both appearance and safety-wise. He did not have a problem with there being six units, but it was the manner it which it was laid out that was causing the difficulty. Chairperson Perrine suggested reopening the Public Hearing for additional Site and Architectural Committee review, as there was a consensus that a different layout of the cul-de-sac needed to be addressed. Commissioner Olszewski agreed that would be a prudent option and would give the Commission a chance to look and hear alternative layouts. M/S: Olszewski, Christ Motion to reopen the Public Hearing on TS 89-07, passed unanimously 6-0-0-1, Commissioner Wilkinson being absent. Mr. Terry of the Nowack & Associates, Inc., Civil Engineers, addressed the Commission. He reported that although they had previously prepared other layout sketches, they were no longer available. Planning Commission Minutes -6- February 13, 1990 Chairman Perrine noted that that was unfortunate, but that the Planning Commission was being asked to make a decision and they had not had an opportunity to review any other layouts. He asked the applicant if he would object to bringing in additional sketches to a Site and Architectural Review Committee meeting which would be scheduled for the following week. This hearing, then, could be continued for two weeks to the next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Olszewski asked that a Public Works representative be present at the Site and Architectural Review Committee meeting. M/S: Alne, Meyer Motion to continue the Public Hearing on TS 89-07 to the next regularly scheduled Planning Cmission meeting of 2-27-90 unanimously passed 6-0-0-1, Co~tissioner Wilkinson being absent. 4. UP 90-01 Martin, G. Public Hearing to consider the application of Mr. Gary Martin for approval of a Use Permit to allow a 1850 square foot sandwich shop/deli operation located on property known as 1600 Dell Avenue in a C-M-80 (Controlled Manufacturing) Zoning District. Chairperson Perrine read the Application into the record. Planning Director Piasecki review the Application and discussed the Staff Report dated February 13, 1990. Commission Discussion: Chairperson Perrine wanted clarification that this is allowed under the zoning as long as a Use Permit is obtained. This was verified by Staff. Applicant Gary Martin addressed the Commission, voiced his opinion on the need for this type of business. Commissioner Christ commended Mr. Martin and agreed full-heartedly with this need. Commissioner Olszewski raised the question of whether there would be enough trash capacity that would be generated from this project to which Director Piasecki assured the Commission this is a small deli and Staff was satisfied with present capacity. M/S: Olszewski, line Motion to close Public Hearing on UP 90-01 unanimously carried 6-0-0-1, Coa~issioner Wilkinson being absent. Planning Commission Minutes -7- February 13, 1990 Olszewski,Christ Comissioners: Comissioners: Commissioner: Notion to adopt the attached Findings and adopt Resolution #2658 approving time Use Per, tit to allow the operation of a 1850 sq. ft. sandwich/deli shop subject to the attached Conditions of Approval, carried with the following roll call vote: Christ, ~ox, Alne, Meyer, Olszewski, 6"mairpersom Perrine None Wilkinson 5. TA 89-03 Public Hearing to consider the addition to Text Amendment to the Campbell Municipal Code, Section 21.02.126, defining "Commercial Vehicle." Chairperson Perrine read the application into the record. City Attorney Seligmann gave a presentation on Alternatives 1 through 5. Commission Discussion In answer to Commissioner Alne's question to define "small" and "van," Mr. Seligmann suggested proposing a specific weight limit for size purposes and in answer to definition of a van, stated it was a term that was in common and one that did not require any further definition for purpose of ordinance. Answering Commissioner Christ's question regarding storage of vehicles, Mr. Seligmann stated that other cities/counties have interpreted as parking on a regular basis on the property to be in violation of ordinances. M/S: Alne, 6%fist Public Hearing on TA 89-03 is now open. The following 15 people expressed concern that all of the alternatives infringed upon their individual property rights and in some cases, would affect their livelihood. 1. Mike Klupfell, 1450 Walnut Dr., Campbell Has altered his truck for his business and Alt. #2 does not allow for this. Is against all of the alternatives. 2. Wilfrud Alridge, 1235 Audrey Ave., Campbell Wanted to know who had started this clarification and under whose initiative. He was against all - the alternatives and ordinance. 3. Mike Tippets, 1553 Capri, Campbell. The alternatives were all wrong. Wanted to have ordinance and alternatives changed/fixed. 4. Charlie Purnell, 1070 Shadydale, Campbell He has a pick-up and under all of the alternatives, he would not be able to keep it. Planning Commission Minutes -8- February 13, 1990 5. ~mna Doherty, 855 Emory Ave., Campbell Ail alternatives were flawed, but would agree to a weight criteria. 6. Mr. Macdamara, Lovell Ave., Campbell Wanted clarification of parking issue. Has tow trucks. He is against all of the alternatives. 7. Ron Wilson, 944 San Tomas Aquino Road, Campbell Has a 1-ton truck, which is not a pick-up. He would go along with weight criteria. 8. Robert Salazar, 1230 Chego, Campbell Wanted to inform all that the weight of a vehicle is written on the tires. 9. Logan Cartright, 1664 Whitwood, Campbell Was against all alternatives. Suggested Commission continue for 90 days. Community should be advised and be able to get together before the meeting to talk about it. 10. Don Armstrong, 66 Christopher Ave., Campbell Alternative #5 would be OK, but doesn't really like any of them. 11. Mark Cook, 1404 Theresa Ave., Campbell Did not support any of the above, but the weight criteria would be the most acceptable. 12. Mike Prince, 1251 Theresa, Campbell Does not support any of the alternatives. 13. David Babosa, 619 Hawthorne Ave., Campbell Against all. 14. Mollie Klupfell, 1450 Walnut Dr., Campbell Wanted to know how to amend an ordinance. Did not support any of the alternatives. 15. Bobi Riley, 940 Robin Lane, Campbell Wants to see new alternative addressing parking and storage. Commissioners felt they did not have enough information to recommend any of the alternatives. Recommend Staff take another look at this issue and perhaps provide photograph evidence from some members of the audience as to what constitutes a 10,000 lb. vehicle, or 1-ton truck, etc. M/S: Olszewski, Meyer Motion to continue TA 89-03 to the Planning Commission's meeting of 3-13-90 unanimously carried 6-0-0-1. Co~nissioner Wilkinson being absent. Chairperson Perrine noted that a copy of the report would be made available to the public upon request. M90-02 (PD 89-06) Ainsley Develop. Referral of the application of Ainsley Development, Inc., for approval of architectural modifications to a previously approved Planned Development Permit allowing the construction of a new restaurant on property known as 690 East Campbell Ave., in as P-D (Planned Development/Commercial) Zoning District. Chairperson Perrine read the Application into the record. Planning Commission Minutes -9- February 13, 1990 Mr. Haley presented Staff Report dated February 13, 1990. Commission Discussion Mr. Haley answered Commissioner Alne's question regaring footprint of building, Commissioner Olszewski's concern regarding parking, and Commissioner's Christ's concern regarding joggers being visible from second-story. The second-story is currently designed only as an employee's lounge and there is no public seating allowed at the present time. Should this be changed in the future, additional plans/revisions would be submitted at the time. Mr. Bruce Bowen, applicant, was asked to address the Commission who reiterated that, at the moment, the second-story is designed for employee lounge and storage. Commissioner Olszewski was concerned about the maintenance/upkeep of awnings and it was recommended that a Condition of Approval address this subject. Commissioner Meyer reported the Site and Architectural Review Committee was satisfied with the layout of the project. MfS: Meyer, Notion to approve the applicant's request for architectural ~odifications to M 90-02 unanimously carried 6-0-0-1, Coa~nissioner Wilkinson being absent. Chairperson Perrine appointed a new subcommittee: Water Conserving Landscape Committee: and Fox. Commissioners Olszewski, Alne P. Rt~RT OF THE P~ DIRECTOR Director Piasecki reminded Commissioners of upcoming League of California Cities - Planning Commissioners Institute Conference in San Diego on March 21, 1990. ADJOURI~ There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 11:05 p.m to the next regular Planning Commission meeting of February 27, 1990, 70 N. First Street, Campbell, 7:30 p.m., City Council Chambers. APPROVED: Jay Perrine Chairperson Attest: Steve Piasecki Secretary Recorded: Pat Masters Recording Secretary