Loading...
PC Min 11/27/1990 P~GCOIOIISSION CITY OF CA, PBgc., CAKIFOP, NI~ 7:30 P.M. CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS TUESDAY NOVEMBER 27, 1990 The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular session in the City Hall Council Chambers, 70 North First Street, Campbell, California, and the following proceedings were had to wit: ROLL C~-T.T. Commissioners Present: chairperson Jay Perrine Commissioner Robert Dougherty Commissioner David Fox Commissioner Jane Meyer-Kennedy Commissioner Mark Wilkinson Commissioner Alana Higgins Commissioners Absent: Commissioner I. (Bud) Alne Staff Present: Director of Planning, Steve Piasecki Planner II, Tim J. Haley Senior Planner, Randy Tsuda Engineering Manager, Bill Helms City Attorney, William Seligmann Recording Secretary, Karon Shaban APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: M/S:Meyer-Kennedy, Higgins MOTION TOAPPROVE ~ PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 13, 1990, WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED, (4-0-1-2), COMMISSIONER ALNEABSENT, AND COMMISSIONERS FOX AND PERRINEABSTAINING DUE TO THEIR ABSENCE AT THE NOVEMBER 13, 1990, MEETING. AGENDA MODIFICATIONS OR POSTPONEN~NTS Item No. 7 was heard at this time due to the applicant's request for a continuance. PUBLIC HEARINGS PD 90-07 Trammell Crow Residential South Bay Assoc. Public Hearing to consider the application of Trammell Crow Residential South Bay Associates, for a Planned Development Permit, to allow the construction of a 398 multiple-family residential project, on property located at 500 Railway Avenue, in a PD (Planned Development) Zoning District. Applicant requests a housing density bonus for the provision of below market rate housing in accordance with State Law. Planning Commission Minutes -2- November 27, 1990 Chairperson Perrine read the Application into the record and noted the applicant's request for a continuance to Date Uncertain. The Chairperson declared the Public Hearing on GP 90-06/ZC 90-12 open. Public Comments: There were no public comments. Fox, Dougherty MOTION TOCLOSET~RPUBLICHKAR/NG WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. M/S: Fox, Meyer-Kennedy NOTION TORE~OV~ ITE~NO. ? FRONT HE C~T.RNDARWASUHANIMOUSLYAPPROVED, 6-0-1. Item No. 8 was heard at this time due to the applicant's request for a continuance. GP 90-04/ ZC 90-13/ PD 90-08 Bowen, B. Public Hearing to consider the application of Mr. Bruce Bowen, on behalf of Ainsley Development, Inc., for approval of an amendment to the General Plan changing a Public/Semi Public Zoning to Commercial Zoning District; approval of a Zone Change from PF (Public Facilities) to PD (Planned Development) Zoning District; and, approval of a Planned Development Permit to allow a 14,000 square foot retail center and a 4000 square foot fast-food, drive-through restaurant, on property located at 3101 South Winchester Boulevard. Chairperson Perrine read the Application into the record and noted the applicant's request for a two week continuance. The Public Hearing on GP 90-04/ZC 90-13/PD 90-08 was opened. Public Comments: There were no comments from the Public. M/S: Fox, Meyer-Kennedy MOTION TOCONTINUETHEPUBLIC~ARINGTO DECEMBER 11, 1990, WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED, 6-0-1. COMMUNICATIONS: Planning Director Piasecki informed the Commission that items of communication were included in the Commission packets and pertain to items on the agenda. The following items were received after the agenda packets were distributed: 1. Letter from Hacienda Village Home Owners' Association, stating objection to the Item No. 8, GP 90-04/ZC 90-13, fast-food Planning Commission Minutes -3- November 27, 1990 drive-through restaurant being located next to the residential property, due to possible traffic impacts in the area. Letter from Robert A. Bryan, Bryan Investment Company, relating to Item No. 8, GP 90-04/ZC 90-13. Mr. Bryan noted opposition due to the following: - increased noise levels - problems associated with trash disposal - increased vehicular traffic - inadequate parking - consistency with the surrounding neighborhood Letter from Goldfarb and Lipman relating to Item No. 1, Redevelopment Plan Resolution. ORAL REQUESTS There were no oral requests. SPECIAL PRESENTATION 1. Redevelopment Department Resolution adopting report and recommendation on Redevelopment Plan and Negative Declaration. The Chairperson read the application into the record. Mr. Robert Kass, Redevelopment Director, presented that staff report and reviewed the proposed administrative amendments to the Central Campbell Redevelopment Plan, as follows: 1. Update Goals and Objectives to more adequately reflect development opportunities and community needs over the past seven years. 2. Update the Owner Participation Process to correspond to the Redevelopment Agency's rules for Owner Participation, adopted in 1988. 3. Establish ongoing General Plan conformance to ensure automatic incorporation of amendments in order to be consistent with the General Plan. 4. Streamline the Development Approval Process to provide a primary process for redevelopment application in the Project Area. 5. Extend the time for use of Eminent Domain for an additional 12 years from the date of adoption, preventing adverse affect on property owners or the Agency. Mr. Marley Quinn, asked if his business, Drake Welding, was in the Redevelopment Area, and Mr. Kass stated that he was not. M/S: Meyer-Kennedy, Fox MOTION TOAD OPT RESOLUTION NO. 2709, RECOMMENDING THATTHE CITY ~OUNCIL GRANT A NEGATIVE DECLARATIONANDADOPTTHEAMENDED R~N~EVELOPMENT PLAN, WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ON TF~FOT~WINGROT.T.C~T~. VOTE: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Conissioners: Commissioners: Commissioners: Higgins, Fox, Meyer-Kennedy, Dougherty, Wilkinson, Perrine None Alne The adopted resolution attached hereto, is made a part of these minutes. * * * Planning Commission Minutes -4- November 27, 1990 PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued} 2. UP 90-13 Dasalla, C. Public Hearing to consider the application of Mrs. Consuelo Dasalla, for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow the establishment of an 18-bed senior housing facility in an existing hospital building, on property located at 531 North Central Avenue, in a C-I-S (Neighborhood Commercial) and R-1-6 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District. Chairperson Perrine read the Application into the record. Mr. Tim J. Haley, Planner II, reviewed the Application and discussed the Staff Report, noting that the request is to re-establish a previously approved use for a senior housing facility. He stated that the request includes the addition of a 580 square foot dining room on the existing building. He stated that Staff is recommending approval with a modification, as suggested by the Architectural Advisor, that a trellis be added to the building and that the plans be returned to the Planning Director indicating this addition. Architectural renderings were presented and reviewed. Commissioner Meyer-Kennedy reported on the Site andArchitectural Review Committee's discussions. She stated that the Committee is recommending approval with the addition of the trellis element. The Applicant, Mrs. Consuelo Dasalla, was amenable to the suggested change. In response Commissioner Dougherty, who referred to availability of parking, asking the number of personnel on site at any one time, Mrs. Dasalla indicated that the maximum number of personnel on site at any one time would not exceed four. The Public Hearing on UP 90-13 was opened. Public Comments: Mr. Robert Mc Coy, the Contractor, asked if the revised trellis plan would place time restraints on the construction. Steve Piasecki, Planning Director, proposed an amendment to Condition No. 1, that would read, "Revised elevations indicating addition of trellis treatment to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor prior to occupancy of the building." M/S:Wilkinson, Meyer-Kennedy MOTION TOCLOSETHEPUBLICHEARING WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. Planning Commission Minutes -5- November 27, 1990 M/S: Dougherty, Meyer-Kennedy MOTION TO ADOPT I~ESOL~TION NO. 2710, INCORPORATING THE ATTACHED FINDINGS · APPROVING UP 90-13, SUBJECT TO THE AMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED BY T~ FOT.?OWING ROT.T. C~T.T. VOTe: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Coaissioners: HiqqJns, Fox, Neyer-Kennedy, Dougherty, Wilkinson, Perrine None Alne The adopted resolution, attached hereto, is made a part of these minutes. 3 . ZC 90-11 (HPB 90-06) Watson, C. Public Hearing to consider the application of Mr. Courtland Watson, for approval of a Zone Change from R-1 (Single-family Residential) to R-1-H (Single-family Residential/Historic Overlay) to allow the property located at 61 Catalpa Avenue, as an Historic Landmark in the City of Campbell. Chairperson Perrine read the Application into the record. Mr. Tim J. Haley, Planner II, reviewed the Application and discussed the Staff Report. He stated that Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission initiate a Zone Change to allow the residence to be designated as an Historic Landmark, for the following reasons: - The E. R. Kennedy House is an excellent example of Spanish Colonial style architecture. - Historical designation will emphasize the importance of historic preservation in the community; and, - The property is listed in the Santa Clara County Heritage Resource Inventory List. Photographs of the home were on display. Commission Discussion: Commissioner Fox asked if the historic designation would inhibit the sale or development of the property associated with the residence. Mr. Haley stated that the Applicant's request was for Historic Designation of the house and courtyard, and that the surrounding properties could be modified. Chairperson Perrine asked if the designation would protect the inside of the home relating to modifications and Mr. Haley responded that local ordinance does not specify or inhibit interior modifications. Planning Commission Minutes -6- November 27, 1990 The Public Hearing on ZC 90-11 was opened. Public Comments: There were no public comments. M/S:Meyer-Kenne~y, Fox NOTION TOCLOSETHEPOBLICHEARING WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. N/S:Fox, Meyer-Kennedy NOTION TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2711, RECOMMENDING THAT CITY COUNCIl. INITIATE A ZONE CHANGE AND DESIGNATE THE STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 61 CAT~?.DA AVENUE AS AN HISTORIC I~%NDMARK, WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED BY ~ AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: Higgins, FOX, Neyer-Kennedy, Dougherty, Wilkinson, Perrine None Alne The adopted resolution, attached hereto, is made a part of these minutes. 4. DA 90-01 City-initiated Public Hearing to consider the City-initiated application for a Development Agreement between the City of Campbell and Bascom Avenue Financial Center regarding credit of parking facilities for properties located at 1701-1707 South Bascom Avenue, in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Chairperson Perrine read the Application into the record. Mr. Tim J. Haley, Planner II, reviewed the Application, and briefly discussed previous negotiations between the City and Bascom Financial Center to provide parking credit to the property owner. He noted that Staff is recommending approval of the Development Agreement. The Chairperson declared the Public Hearing on DA 90-01 open. Public Comments: Mr. Norman Matteoni, Attorney at Law, addressed the Commission requesting support for the settlement of condemnation and approval of the subject development agreement. M/S: Dougherty, Meyer-Kennedy NOTION TOCLOSETHEPUBLICHEARING WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. M/S: Fox, Higgins MOTION TO ACCEPT THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION PRR~ARED FOR THIS PROJECT AND ADOPTRESOLUTION NO. 2712, INCORPORATING T~R. ATTACHED FINDINGS, Planning Commission Ninutes -7- Novembe~ 27, ~990 RECOI~]~qDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE T~ DEVELOPMENT AG~R~]~TT WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED BY ~ FOT.T.OWING POLL C~T.T. VOTE: ~s: commissioners: NOES: commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: Higqins, Fox, Neyer-Kennedy, Dougherty, #ilkinson, Perrine None Alne The adopted resolution, attached hereto, is ~ade a part of these minutes. 5. TA 90-03 City-initiated Public Hearing to consider a City-initiated application amending the text of the City's Municipal Code establishing a DensityBonus Ordinance allowing an increase in the ~aximum number of units currently availableunderthe City's General Plan with the provision of affordable housingunits. Chairperson Perrine read the Application into the record. Randy Tsuda, Senior Planner, reviewed the proposed Text Amendment and discussed the Staff Report. He provided a brief overview of the document, as follows: - This is a local implementation measure required b y the State for cities to grant a density bonus of at least 25 percent to encourage affordable housing to people with, very low, low income, or seniors on fixed incomes. - That cities Must also provide at least one other incentive or make findings that an incentive is not necessary for affordability. - Terms for Below Market Rate is for 30 years, however, 10 years if only the density bonus is granted. - Eligibility - Process will require that applicants requesting density bonus must be approved by City Council Co--ission Discussion: Commissioner Fox asked what the possible highest bonus would be. In response Mr. Tsuda stated that the State does not specify how many incentives a jurisdiction is able to offer, however, he stated that at least one incentive is required to ensure affordability. Commissioner Higgins asked what would happen if a property owner later wanted to convert the affordable housing into higher priced housing. Mr. Tsuda explained that if a city grants a density bonus and one incentive then the unit would have to remain affordable for thirty years. Plannin~ Commission M~nutes -8- November 27, 1990 Commissioner Dou~he~cy asked if the affordability of a unit could be extended and Mr. Tsuda stated laws governing the length of time a unit must be kept affordable is ~andated by the State and could not be extended. Commissioner Dougherty requested that additional language be included to ensure that preliminary comments ~ade by Staff to applicants does not bind the Commission or the City Council's decisions. City Attorney, Williu Seligmann, suggested that additional language be added under Section 21.62.90 (A) to the last sentence, as follows: m.. . , such comment or preliminary evaluation does not find future City actions,m Commissioner Meyer-Kennedy asked if the housing units would be dispersed within the housing complexes. Mr. Tsuda indicated that low income units would be dispersed throughout the housing complexes and that any relocation of these units would require approval by the City. Discussion ensued between Commissioners and staff regarding the following: Park dedication fees Transfer of density bonuses to other developments The Public Hearing on TA 90-03 was opened. Public Comments: There was no public comment. M/S: Meyer-Kennedy, Fox MOTION TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. M/S: Dougherty, Meyer-Kennedy MOTION TO GRANT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2713, APPROVING TA 90-03, AS AMENDED WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: Higgins, Fox, Meyer-Kennedy, Dougherty, Wilkinson, Perrine None Alne The adopted resolution, attached hereto, is made a part of these minutes. Planning Co--ission Xinutes -9- November 27, 1990 6. GP 90-06 ZC 90-12 Public BearJ~j to conside~ the Cit¥-initiate~ application for approval of a General Plan A~endment for the South of Campbell lvenueArea ($OCA), a 121 acre area generally bounded by Campbell Avenue to the north, San Tomas Expressway to the south, the Southern Pacific RaiLroad tracks to the west, and the Los Gatos Creek to the east. SOCA also includes an area bounded by Kennedy Avenue to the north, Industrial Avenue to the west and the Southern PacificRailroad tracks to the south and east. The C~-neral Plan Land Use Designations for SOCAare proposed tobe changed from a mixture of Industrlal,. Commercial, and Public Facilityuses to be changed from C-2-S (General Commercial) to PF (Public Facilities), M-1-S (Light Industrial) to PD (Planned Development). Chairperson Perrine read the Application into the record. Mr. Randy Tsuda, Senior Planner, discussed the Staff Report, noting the following: - The City retained the fir~ of Sedway Cooke Associates to prepare a planning study of the SOCA area to investigate a means to revitalize the downtown area. - SOCA is only one component of the overall downtown strategy, others include: - NOCAStudy - Streetscape - Circulation Improvement - Realignment of SalmarAvenue - Restoration of two way traffic in the downtown area. - Review of the Land Use Modifications within the individual Sub-Areas - Development Policies to provide incentives for consolidation of parcels for redevelopment, and to provide for consistency regarding height, bulk, ~assing and open space. This would include encouraging larger trees, consistent landscaping along the trail, similar roof patterns, street furniture, and the width of proposed structures. - Zone Change to Planned Development that will allow this strategy to take place. - Floor area ratio - Allowing existing businesses to operate and expand. An overhead mapwas displayed representing the 5 Sub-Areas. Further Mr. Tsuda noted that two community meetings were held to discuss the proposed General Plan Amendment prior to finalization of the draft document before the Commission. He stated that the subject document was an attempt to revitalize the downtown area, exclude possibility of incremental developments, allow for mixeduses, and to attain an orderly development pattern. Planning Co~issionltinutes -10- Nove~d~ 27, 1990 Co--ission Discussion: Discussion ensued relating to proposed zoning and Coaissioner Dougherty raised questions relative to the population types that will be encouraged in the area. Nr. Tsuda stated that Staff did not consider the population types, rather the best means to revitalize the downtown area. Coaissioner Dougherty indicated that his intent relating the consideration of population types stems from concern regarding school busing availability, etc., further, he indicated that he would raise this issue again when the Housing Element is revised. The Chairperson declared the Public Hearing on GP 90-06/ZC 90-12 open. Public Comments: Mr. Mark Cooke, 1404 Theresa Avenue, expressed concern relating to additional parking facilities or additional parks for a large housing development project. Mr. Tsuda stated that higher density projects would be required to provide open space, recreation and parking for there tenants. Mr. Norman Oaks, Owner of Industrial Building cited for rezoning, expressed confusion regarding the definition of PD Zoning, expressed concern that his building located in Sub-Area 4, when rezoned, will become non-conforming due to~aximum flcor area. Mr. Tsuda provided a definition of PD Zoning for Mr. Oaks, and explained that relative to the Document, Staff's intent was not to~ake existing business non-conforming. Commissioner Wilkinson requested that zoning designation be Wgrandfatheredw in and that working be added to ensure that existing businesses continue until perpetuity. Mr. Gordon Martin, Timber Cove Home Ownersw Association, expressed concern relating to Land Use and Zoning Designations; that Timber Cover Mobile Home Park, Sub-Area 2, would be jeopardized by the proposed high-density zoning designations. Mr. Tsuda ensured Nr. Martin that since the General Plan is the controlling document, Timber Cove Mobile Home will r~main zoned for Mobile Home Parks. Mr. Alba Jensen, property owner within Sub-Area 5, requested clarification regarding his future plans to establish an auto repair shop at the property. Mr. Tsuda stated that the City has acknowledged the fact that Mr. Jensen has been working with Staff to establish a new auto repair facility, and that a policy allowing a new auto repair facility on that site is included. Mr. Piasecki noted that a new auto repair facility on this site cannot have a negative impact on other developments in the area or on the Planning CosmissionRinutes -11- November 27, 1990 overall Redevelopment Plan. ~r. Larry Pedersen, 900 Dell Avenue, discussedthe history of his business, &-Tool Shed, not/hq that he has had to~ove his facility to various locations with/n Santa Clara County as a result of rezon/ng, and he urged the Commission to conside~ do/hq a~ay with Liqht-Industrial Zoning. He stated that residenta ~n Santa Clara County will suffer as a result of 1Mted light-/ndustrial services. Ns. Charlotte~asse, 136 Kennedy Avenue, owner of a pest control business, expressed concerns s/~ilartoMr. Pedersen, that the elimination of Light-Xndustrial Zoning in the area would li~it home owners ability to get pest control services in the area. Further, she cautioned the Commission to consider.the traffic im~act~ that a High-DensityResidential Zone create. In response, Hr. Tsuda noted that the area Ns. Masse is concerned about will not be eliminating Light-Industrial use. Mr. ShyamTaggarsi, Trammel Crow, Residential South Bay Associates, addressed the Commission in support of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Changes. Mr. Pedersen noted that in the late 1960ts, it was City Staff that suggested he establish his business in this location. Further, he stated, that now his building will be non-conforming and he will not be allowed to expand his current business to add a storage shed, whichwas part of his long term plan. Chairperson Perrine requested input from Staff that would resolve Mr. Pedersen ' s concerns. Mr. Tsuda stated that a polio7 could be added to the current document that would not impact existing businesses, which become non-conforming due to the proposed changes, to~aintain viability. Director Piasecki added that requested changes from existing business could not impact the long range redevelopment plans of the City. Further, Mr. Tsuda stated that under the current ordinance a wholly enclosed storage shed would be allowed under the C-2-S Zoning. In response to Chairperson Perrine question about the time line of the proposed changes, Planning Director Piasecki stated that the timeline for changes is unknown. Commissioner Fox suggested that Sub-Area 5 be zoned the same as Sub-Area 4. Mr. Piasecki noted that the intention of the proposed zoning is to discourage a significant industrial use in the area. Commissioner Fox argued that Nr. Pedersen could be allowed the same type of assurance of business viability as Hr. Alba Jensenhas been provided regarding his new auto repair facility, as mentioned above. Planning Conission l~.nutes -12- November 27, 1990 ]tr. Piasecki ~ndicated that Staff preferred the proposed wording in order to put potential business operators on notice, up front, and, that providing ]tr. Pedersen ¥ith the assurance he is requesting, could create a situation where the Commission could have to consider proposals on a case-by-case basis. Cow~/ssioner Fox was supportive of looking at existing businesses on a case-by-case basis. Nr. Marley Ouinn, Sub-Area 4 business operator, asked and was provided with answers to questions regarding potential ii.acts the zoning changes would have on his business. Staff indicated his current business would not be impacted in anyway. lit. Pedersen cautioned the Co~ssion about planning for hotel, motel and restaurants in Sub-Area 5, noting ~hat existing operations of this type are not doing well. · Mr. Gordon Daniels, Sub-Area 2 business owner, asked about his business and was informed that there would be no impact on his existing business on Railway Avenue. David Usbaugh, Theresa Avenue, asked why Staff is recommending PD Zoning for the entire area. Mr. Tsuda explained that the PD Zoning allows flexibilit¥ but still requires consistency with the General Plan. Chairperson Perrine suggested that public testimony end, however, he opted to leave the Public Hearing open for further input if necessary. Commission Fox affirmed his intent to add Commercial Zoning to Sub-Area 5, and noted this would allow flexibility to business operators and would prevent mstrangling expansion and i~provementsm of existing businesses. Discussion continued between Commissioners and Staff regarding the individual Sub-Areas. The following ~ajor issues were discussed: - Addition of a policy to encourage naturalized plant species to be planted along the Los Gatos Creek Trail. - Traffic impacts within Sub-Area 2, Mr. Helms explaining future plans for the area to mitigate traffic concerns. - The proposed Light Rail facility along the Southern Pacific Additional comments were received by Mr. Marley Quinn suggesting that additional access to the Highway 17 is needed due to the congestion around the other two on ramps. Nr. Helms informed him that his suggestion was investigated by the City Ws consultant and found infeasible; and, that the completion of Route 85 should eliminate some congestion in the area. Commissioners requested Document language supporting existing businesses in Sub-Area 5 allowing expansion of existing use and allowing the Commission to examine applications on a case-by-case basis. Planning Commission Minutes -13- November 27, 1990 Staff suggested the following wording, m. . . include modifications to square footage of ex/sting businesses which exceed the allowed floor area ratio maybe consideredbythe Planning Commission. M/S: Fox, Dougherty MOTION TO CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED. M/S: Dougherty, Higgins MOTION TO RECOMMEND THAT CITY COUNCIL GRANT A NEGATIVE DECLARATION, APPROVE THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, TO INCLUDE THE INTENT OF THE COMMISSION RELATIVE TO DISCUSSION OF SUB-AREAS 2, 4, AND 5; AND, APPROVE THE ZONE CHANGE DESIGNATION, WAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ON THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: Higgins, Fox, Meyer-Kennedy, Dougherty, Wilkinson, Perrine None Alne REPORT OF THE pLANNING DIRECTOR The report of the Planning Director was accepted. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission adjourned at 10:25 p.m., to the next regular Planning Commission meeting of Tuesday, December 11, 1990, at 7:30 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 70 North First Street, Campbell. The Planning Commission meeting of December 25, 1990, has been cancelled. APPROVED BY: Jay R. Perrine Chairperson ATTEST: Steve Piasecki Secret~r~ SUBMITTED BY: Karon Shaban Reporting Secretary