2347 Winchester Blvd. (90-12)
Item Nos. 2 & 3
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR APPLICATIONS S 90-11 AND S 90-12
2341-2391 AND 2395-2505 SOUTH WINCHESTER BOULEVARD
APPLICANTS: MR. JOHN MCNULTY, MBH ARClllTECTS
MR EDDY SHEN, LRS ASSOCIATES
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: February 12, 1991
After notification and public hearing as specified by law on the applications of
Eddy Shen (application S 90-12) and John McNulty (application S 90-11) for
approval of plans and elevations to allow remodeling and expansion of the
existing Campbell Plaza Shopping Center on property known as 2341-2505
South Winchester Blvd. APN 305-36-3,4,5,6,and 7, located in a C-2-S (General
Commercial with Site and Architectural Approval required); and, after
presentation by the Planning Department, proponents and opponents, the
hearing was closed.
After due consideration of all evidence presented, the Planning Commission
made the attached findings labeled exhibit A; and
Based on the findings, the Planning Commission does hereby grant the
requested Site and Architectural Approval to allow the requested remodel of
the Campbell Plaza Shopping Center, subject to the attached conditions:
Planning Department
1. Approved Exhibits
The site and architectural approval is based on the following approved
exhibits, as redlined:
1. Site plans
a. Sheet "A-I" received by the Planning Department on Feb. 06, 1991,
illustrating both the north and south sites covered by these
a pplica tions.
b. Site plan labelled sheet "A-21t by LRS Associates dated 11/29/90.
2. Landscape plans
a. "Landscape Plan" sheet 1 of 2 dated Sept. 29, 1990, by MBH Architects
and Terra Media Landscape Architects.
b. Sheet "L-I" dated 11/29/90 by LRS Associates.
c. Landscape details exhibit labeled "Landscape Sections" drawing no. 2
of 2 dated Sept. 29, 1990 by MBH Architects and Terra Media Landscape
Architects, as modified by Budd Ave. and Winchester Blvd. section
drawings.
3. Elevations
a. Safeway store and adjacent shops sheets A-3 and A-4 dated 11/29/90
by LRS Associates. Drawing No.2 labelled "Site Contextual Exterior
Elevations" and No.3 dated 11/29/90 by MBH Architects
b. Remainder of center labeled A-5 and A-6 dated 11/29/90 by LRS
Associates.
Planning Commission Staff Report S 90-11 & S 90-12
Pa~e -2-
4. Architectural perspectives
a. Perspective From Budd Ave. dated 11/29/90 by MBH Architects.
b. Budd/Nido perspective
c. "Perspective Drawing View From Winchester Boulevard"
d. "Perspective Drawing View From Budd and Nido drawing no. 5."
5. Details
a. "Section Through Loading Dock" dated 1-11-91, by MBH Architects.
b. Materials/ colors board.
c. Safeway freestanding sign labeled "Site Sign Concept Drawing No.4"
dated Feb. 1,1991.
February 12,1991
2. Budd Ave. Frontage Landscaping
The landscape area in front of the existing commercial building on the Budd
Ave. and Winchester Blvd. corner and in front of the existing Winchell's
Donut shop shall be replanted to match the plant materials and design of the
respective public street frontages.
3. Nido Dr. Frontage Landscaping
The landscaping along the Nido Drive frontage shall be designed to screen
cars parked in the adjacent parking lots and provide canopy trees to shade the
public sidewalk area. Pedestrian and bicycle access shall be provided through
the landscape area. The landscaping behind the Safeway Market shall provide
a clinging vine or other plant material to grow on the westerly facing wall
element.
4. Nido Driveways
The existing driveways on Nido Drive shall be eliminated and replaced with
landscaping and sidewalks. A single driveway is permitted adjacent to the
truck loading dock which serves the Safeway store. If traffic complaints are
received, the Planning Commission may review the design and necessity of
this driveway and require its removal or modification to address the
concerns. The applicant/property owner shall agree to modify or eliminate
the driveway at their own expense and accommodate all truck circulation and
turnaround on-site.
5. Construction Timing/Integrated Development
The two Site and Architectural applications S 90-11 and S 90-12 are located on
the same site and integrated in terms of architecture, site and landscape
improvements. The building permits for both portions of the southerly
portion of the Campbell Plaza Shopping Center shall be released and
construction commenced at the same time or ahead of construction of the
Safeway portion of the center.
If construction is not possible as identified above, the remaining construction
shall be guaranteed through a cash deposit, faithful performance bond oreother surety acceptable to the City Attorney.
Planning Commission Staff Report S 90-11 & S 90-12
Pa~e -3-
February 12, 1991
6. Vehicular Circulation
The on-site driveways shall be adjusted to eliminate abrupt curves in the
driveway aisle alignments.
7. Pedestrian Circulation
Pedestrian connections shall be accommodated from the public sidewalk areas
to the Safeway Market and theater buildings along the frontage of the
commercial buildings at the north and south ends of the site and from the
Budd Ave. sidewalk to the Safeway Store. The pedestrian walkways shall be
delineated with special paving treatment where they cross driveway aisles.
Additionally, pedestrian and bicycle access shall be provided through the 10 ft.
wide Nido Dr. landscape strip.
8. Architectural Compatibility
The architectural treatment of the non-Safeway portions of the buildings 2,3,
and 4, shall match the style, design and details presented on the exhibits for
the Safeway store. The details shall incorporate the materials, colors, roof
pitch and height, horizontal sign band element and the dimensions of the
vertical support columns. The recently constructed building at the corner of
Budd Ave. and Winchester Blvd. shall be exempt from these architectural
requirements except that the building color shall be modified to match or
blend with the building color used on the other portions of the center.
The remaining buildings in the center shall be constructed as indicated on the
approved exhibits. The rear of the mansard roof elements shall be faced with
a continuous material, such as plywood, and painted out with a neutral color
to block visibility of the roof framing members from adjacent residential areas
or public street areas. The building colors are approved per the color exhibit
submitted by MBH Architects using a dark burgundy roof color and off-white
walls and soffits.
9. Foto Mat. Flower Shop Buildings
The existing Foto Mat building and the flower shop shall be incorporated
onto one pad area with a consistent landscaping treatment and painted to
match the remainder of the center.
10. Roof Equipment Screening
All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters shall be screened as
approved by the Planning Director.
11. Fencing and Landscaping
Property to be landscaped and fenced as indicated and/or indicated in red on
the approved plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in
accordance with the approved plans.
Planning Commission Staff Report S 90-11 & S 90-12
Pa~e -4-
February 12, 1991
12. Utility Box Screening
All transformer boxes, above ground meters and PG&E utility boxes shall be
located away from publicly visible frontages or screened subject to the
approval of the Planning Director, prior to installation.
13. Building Occtqlanc::ylPublic Improvements
Building occupancy of the buildings which are expanding will not be
permitted until public improvements are installed.
14. Parking /Driveways
All parking and driveway areas shall be developed in compliance with
Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces shall be
provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards.
15. Underground Utilities
Underground utilities to be provided as required by section 20.36.150 of the
Campbell Municipal Code.
16. Underground Utilities Connection
Plans submitted to the Building Division for a plan check shall indicate
clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including
water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc.
17. Sign Approval
Sign applications to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the Sign
Ordinance for all planned or future signs. No sign to be installed until
application is approved and permit issued by the Planning and Building
Departments (Section 21.53 of the Campbell Municipal Code) and is found to
be in conformance with the comprehensive sign program delineated on
exhibit A-3.
The existing Safeway freestanding sign shall be removed. The Safeway tenant
sign and logo located over the market entrance are approved.
18. Garbage Collection
Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any
contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and
rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made
with Green Valley Disposal Company.
19. Trash Container and Recycle Area
Trash containers and recycle bins of a size and quantity necessary to serve the
development shall be located in areas approved by the Fire Department. All
enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to
Planning Commission Staff R~port S 90-11 & S 90-12 February 12, 1991
Pa~e -5-
the trash enclosure area to service these containers. All screening to be
approved by the Planning Director.
The recycling bins shall be located on a separate pad area in the front parking
lot along Winchester Blvd. Alternatively, the applicant may utilize
individual recycling machines located in front of the market to satisfy the
State laws requiring recycling on-site.
The existing recycling bins shall be eliminated or relocated from the corner of
Budd Ave. and Nido Drive to the Winchester Blvd. frontage prior to
commencement of demolition or issuance of building permits.
20. Handicapped Requirements
Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for
the handicapped.
Public Works Department
21. Easements for IngresslEgress and Parking
The applicant shall either record vehicular and pedestrian ingress/egress
easements on and over the respective parcels involved in the subject
application or demonstrate that satisfactory easements currently exist. If any
of the parcels are currently under one ownership the easements shall be
placed in escrow and recorded simultaneously with any sale or transfer of
ownership of any of the affected parcels. Alternatively, the applicant may
consolidate any or all of the existing separate parcels to eliminate or simplify
the easements required under this condition.
Provide evidence of reciprocal parking easements where necessary to ensure
that all independent parcels meet the parking standards of the Campbell
Municipal Code.
22. Bus DuckoutlDeceleration and Acceleration Lane
Provide a combined bus duckout/ deceleration & acceleration lane at the
northerly Winchester Boulevard driveway subject to approval by the City
Engineer. The bus duckout shall include a concrete pad and bus shelter
located clear of the sidewalk area.
23. Encroachment Permit
Obtain an encroachment permit, pay fees, and post a surety for relocating
driveways, constructing curb gutter and sidewalks and for any other work
required in the public right-of-way.
24. Grading/Drainage Plans
Provide five sets of grading and drainage plans including the Safeway
building site and landscape or site changes, for review by the City Engineer.
Planning Commission Staff Report S 90-11 & S 90-12
Pa~e -6-
February 12, 1991
25. Street Improvements
a. Remove existing electroliers on the Winchester Blvd. frontage and
replace as directed by the City Engineer.
b. Remove and replace existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk as directed by
the City Engineer.
c. Provide plans for any non-standard driveway approaches to the City
Engineer for approval.
d. Obtain an excavation permit, pay fees and post surety for all
improvements within the public right-of-way.
26. Budd Ave./Winchester Blvd. Improvements
a. The northerly driveway on Winchester Blvd. shall accommodate a
physical barrier to direct traffic to a right turn into and right turn out of
the driveway, thereby prohibiting left turns into or out of the driveway.
b. Modify the Budd/Winchester signal as follows;
1. Restripe Budd as directed by the City Engineer to provide separate
eastbound right and left turn only lanes. Parking along the south
side of Budd to be prohibited between the easterly driveway on
Budd Ave. and Winchester Blvd.
2. Provide a right turn on arrow only condition for eastbound Budd
Ave. Install right turn arrow signal heads for this purpose.
3. Provide an illuminated "No U-Turn" sign for the northbound
traffic at this intersection. Install sign as directed by the City
Engineer.
4. Provide a protected left turn condition for northbound
Winchester Blvd. traffic. Install new signal standard and mast arm
on the northeast corner as directed by the City Engineer.
5. Lengthen the northbound left turn lane on Winchester Blvd. and
res tripe the two-way left turn lane as directed by the City Engineer.
27. Street Trees
An alternate street tree acceptable to the the Public Works Department shall
be planted instead of the Liquidambar styraciflua. Submit a proposed street
tree plan to Public Works for approval.
28. Southerly Winchester Blvd. Driveway
Provide a deceleration lane for the southerly driveway on Winchester Blvd.,
as directed by the City Engineer.
Fire Department
29. Fire Hydrants
All portions of new buildings shall be within 150 ft. travel distance of a
municipal or on-site fire hydrant. Additional on-site fire hydrants may be
required where any portion of a new building is greater than 150 ft. travel
Planning Commission Staff Report S 90-11 & S 90-12
Pa~e -7-
distance from an existing fire hydrant or a change in driveway configuration
causes such a condition.
February 12, 1991
30. Property LineslFire Protection
Exterior wall and opening protection is required at property lines dividing the
shopping center.
31. Driveway Clearance
The required driveway width shall be maintained to a clear height of 13 ft. 6
inches.
32. Fire Sprinklers
The building shall be provided with supervised fire sprinkler protection
throughout.
33. Firehoses
Provide firehose outlets for new construction as detailed in UFC, Sec. 10.311
(f) as amended.
Building Division
34. Building Code
The building plans shall meet all relevant building code requirements at the
time of review. Applicant shall provide a code analysis to include square
footage, type of construction, area increases etc.
35. Pedestrian Crossings Between Buildings
Show all pedestrian crossings between buildings to include curb ramps for
handicapped and access from public sidewalks via established stripped
walkways, signage etc. (handicapped access begins at the project boundary or
property line).
36. Handicapped Requirements
The existing site plans shall comply with handicapped requirements.
37. Construction Hours
Construction is limited to weekdays (Monday through Friday) between the
hours of 7:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
Item Nos. 2 & 3
Exhibit A
FINDINGS FOR APPUCATIONS S 90-11 AND S90-12
2341-2391 AND 2395-2505 SOUTH WINCHESTER BOULEVARD
APPUCANTS: MR. JOHN MCNULTY, MBH ARCHITECTS
MR EDDY SHEN, LRS ASSOCIATES
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: JANUARY 22, 1991
The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell finds as follows with
regards to Site and Architectural Permit Application No. S 90-11 and S 90-12:
1. The proposals are consistent with the General Plan and Zoning District
which permits commercial land uses.
2. The proposals meet the General Commercial zoning district
requirement for 10% landscape area with a continuous landscape
treatment along public street frontages, and
3. The proposal meets the parking requirements of the zoning ord., and
4. The application coordinates the architectural and landscape treatment
for the shopping center; and
S. The proposed project is of an appropriate scale and design and is
compatible with the existing commercial and residential development in
the area.
Based on the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further
finds and concludes that:
1. The proposed project, subject to the conditions imposed, is consistent
with the General Plan; and
2. The proposed project, subject to the conditions imposed is consistent
with the General Commercial zoning ordinance requirements relating to
parking, landscaping standards, and
3. The proposed project will aid in the harmonious development of the
immediate area; and
4. The proposal complies with the purpose of the Site and Architectural
Review Area to enhance the character and integrity of the surrounding
neighborhood.
S. The conditions relating to traffic will mitigate any traffic impacts from
the additional building area.
SIREEr FASEMENI'
We CAMPBEIL PIAZA D~R>fENI' CD. a
limited partnership do herel:7j grant to
the City of Call1PJe1l, a namicipal
Corporation in the COmIty of Santa
Clara, state of california an
easerert for street p.n:poses described
as:
All that certain real property situate in the City of canp1ell,
Co\mty of Santa Clara, state of california, described as folows:
A portion of that certain parcel of lard cx>nveyed I:7:i deed ard filed
for record in Book 7427 of Official Records at page 699, sana Clara
County Records, m:>re particularly described as follows:
BmINNING at a point on the westerly l:x>t1OOary of that certain parcel .
of lard conveyed to the City of ~ll ard filed in Book 6623 of
Official Records at page 245, Santa Clara Co\mty Records, asid point
bears South 00 18' 20" Fast, 310.47 feet iran the northwesterly
corner of said parcel conveyed to the City of ~ll:
'!HENCE South 890 45' 00" West, alon;J the southerly l:x>t1OOary of said
parcel of lard described in Book 7427 of Official Records at page
699, a distance of 12.00 feet:
'!HENCE North 00 18' 20" West, parallel to the westerly l:x>t1OOary of
said parcel conveyed to the City of CaJIP:lell, a distance of 79.14
feet:
'!HENCE along a tangent curve to the right, concave easterly, with a
radius of 78.00 feet, through a central argle of 220 36' 57" an arc
length of 30.79 feet:
'!HENCE along a tangent reverse curve to the left, concave westerly,
with a radius of 78.00 feet, through a OE!!Iltral argle of 220 36' 57"
an arc length of 30.79 feet to said westerly l:x>t1OOary:
'!HENCE South 00 18' 20" Fast, alcn;J last said l:x>t1OOary, a distance of
139.14 feet to the Point of Begi.rn1:inJ:
Cont.ai.ni.nJ an area of 1,309 square feet, m:>re or less.
WI'lNESS Irrf harrl this ~day of /( ~- , 1991:
CMner: Calt'IPJell Plaza Developnent Co., a limited partnership
~1ti1~)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of - - ~ant.a- Clar.a- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
} ss.
On _ )~oy_. _ ?~,_ J~~~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , before me, Patricia M McClure
- - - - - - - - (Name o(Notillymtle-) - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
personally appeared . . . .J.o.sPlih .G. Cqs.t~J..lo. .*'!:-J:.*.*.*f.<"!":.*-*. _ , personally known to me W~~!&~
}(IU~tJ1i~~~lIa\~ce) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscnbed to the within instrument and ac.
knowledged to me that he/~y executed the same in hist'l1ex1durir authorized capacity(ies) and that by h~K
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the
instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
/'
~
,d "i
X{Z I, ,-' " '?
'J427:.~~~.c,-,_4_ !(~4~~~-~< :_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
(Signature)
OFFICiAL SEA., I
PAWICIA M McC:J,;;E ,
NOTARY P:08UC. L^\i_ir\.,~,"\"
SANTA Cl?\RA COUNT'i
My comrr,\Ss:on expires Feb, 16, l~n
030-04242 (Rev, 6191)
o. (lzsry:zr FASDfENr
We, BEITJf -L emI , surviving Trustee
of the 1981 ~I FAMILY 'lRUST, as to
an urrli vided 25% interest; BEITE J.
emI surviving Trustee of the ~I
FAMILY EXEMPl'ICfi 'lRUST dated Januazy
23, 1986 as to an urrli vided 11.25%
interest; ani BEITE J. emI , surviving
'Irustee of the emI FAMILY MARITAL 'lRUST
dated Januazy 23, 1986, as to an urrli vided
13.75% interest, ani JOSEPH G. CASTELlD
AND GI.aUA L. CASTELI.D, Trostees of the
1982 CASTELI.D LIVING 'IRUsr DATED October
14, 1982 as to an uOOivided 50% interest,
do hereby grant to the City of On1'1rell, a
Municipal Corporation in the Co\mty of Santa
Clara, state of Califomia, for street
p.zrposes the following:
All that certain real property situate in the City of Qmp:lell, Co\mty
of Santa Clara, state of California, described as follows:
A portion of Parcel 1 ani Parcel 2, as stnm at that Parcel Map filed
for record in the office of the Recorder of the Co\mty of Santa Clara,
state of California on October 4, 1989, in Book 606 of Maps, at pages
16 ani 17, nore particularly described as follows:
Carmencing at the southeast oorner of said Parcell;
'!HENCE North 000 18' 20" west, along the east line of said Parcell, a
distance of 185.17 feet to the True Point of Beg:innirg;
'!HENCE North 000 18' 20" west, along said east line, a distance of
266.89 feet;
'!HENCE South 050 34' 50" west 3.43 feet to the beg:innirg of a curve to
the right, cx>ncave westerly, having a radius of 68.00 feet;
'!HENCE along said curve through a cela.atl aIX3le of 160 43' 51" an arc
l~ of 19.86 feet to a point of reverse curvature;
'!HENCE along said reverse curve to the left having a radius of 88.00
feet, through a central angle of 220 37' 01" an arc length of 34.74
feet;
'!HENCE south 000 18' 20'.' Fast, 154.03 feet to the beg:innirg of a curve
to the left having a radius of 88.00 feet;
'!HENCE along said curve through a ceuual al'XJle of 220 37' 01" an arc
lergth of 34.74 feet to a point of reverse curvature;
'IHENCE alc:.D3' said reverse curve to the right, c:xn:::ave westerly, having
a radius of 68.00 feet, through a oelttral al'XJle of 160 43' 51" an arc
lergth of 19.86 feet;
'!HENCE South 060 11' 30" East a distance of 3.43 feet to the True
Point of Beg~:
Containing an area of 2,597 square feet, mre of less.
witness our hams this p?2. day of ~ o-d , 1991:
~~.@~4<-..
J. Orsi, Trustee
1981 Orsi Family Trost
;0.e.~ 9- @~~ .
Bette J. Orsi, Trustee
Orsi Family Exemptioo Trost
&~,2'~~
Bette J. orsi, Tn1stee
Orsi Family Marital Trost
~~
{ Castello, Trustee
110 Li vi.n:J Trost
) f . y5
!lL-.Z-tA- ~q. C~
Gloria L. Castello, Trustee
1982 castello Living Trost
Drawn
MICHAEL
o
nil. Bn/>"
J. MAJO~Sl CIVIL ENGINEERS.
VLA VLlLJ
BUDD AVE
INC.
~
,
u::;
;"-'0'
~atO
. . co
to co .
r-c.o~
,
a
U"l,
, r')
~~
r') .
~r')
a
(f)
w
.0
~I~
NI~
tOo
a
(f)
,......
to
N~
-l(f)
wCl...
u<
0:::::iE
<to
Cl...a
to
'"--'
VI
Q)
L...
U
o
~
>
-.J
P=l
Ct::
W
l-
(/)
W
:r:
u
z
>-<
::3
~
to
ci
,
o
r...o'
r>a~
Ncx:i~
NCOr')
II
<Jo::...J
w
z
:J
~
........
0::
l'>
Z
F
(f)
x
w
;"-'1
~I
U"l
I
I
~
w
z
:J
=
, a
~~
trico
w ~ S
a
I
........
~+
FI-
<w
UW
_u..
o
WW
00::
<(
0::)
Wo
~(f)
Cl...1'
N~~
Cl...N
I
,......
to
,
o
'I" .
r')a~
. a I'
N . .
NCO~
cor')
II II II
<Jo::...J
~ .
........ a
0:: ~I
8 bl
~ a
15 (f)
0::
Cl...
z
I
I
VI
Q)
L...
U
o
-l(f)
~~
0:::::E I'
<( I'
Cl... ~ iii
to
'"--'
,
u::;
;..-,0.
;<t~:8
to co .
-c.o~
II II II
<JO::-l
w
.
g ~)
~~
f.;..-i
o
z
, ~b
I'N
--=co
U"l~
co.
~Ig
I(f)
Job 4-337 - 03
Checked
Parcel
Scale
,"=40'
Date
t), ~.91
.
(
I
I
I
i
I
CITY OF CAMPBELL
70 NORTH FIRST STREET
C AMP BEL L, C A L I FOR N I A 9 5 0 0 8
(408) 866-2100
FAX # (408) 379-2572
I WIMBERLY
i-
I :1ELMS
~
1.JQCSON
r~-Ufj~'
r;ENO~~R
-:
Department:
Public Works
February 22, 1991
Mr. John McNulty
McNulty Briskman Heath
1305 Marina Village Parkway
Suite 101
Alameda, CA 94501
SUBJECT: CAMPBELL PlAZA SHOPPING CENTER
OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS
Dear Mr. McNulty:
I received your letter of February 14, 1991, regarding off-site
improvement requirements in connection with the shopping center
renovation.
The Engineering Division of the City's Public Works Department does
not have sufficient staffing to provide design services for public
improvements associated with land development projects. Our role is
limited to providing criteria to consulting engineers retained by
developers and reviewing their proposed construction documents prior
to approval by the City.
Any questions regarding our procedure for improvement plans review
could be directed to Michelle Quinney at (408) 866-2150.
Sincerely,
Bill M. Helms
Engineering Manager
BMH: sd
f:cmbl-p1za
MBH
R Ii: C r;; I ~\{; 1:"' .~'..,
a;; v L,; ,':..t
\I{(:IIITF<:TS
F [. 1.3 J ~'/: l:~~ ~/ ]
February 14, 1991
Public Woriu/El1gincorin;1
The City of Campbell
70 North First Street
Campbell, CA 95008
Mr. Bill Helms, City Engineer
Dear Mr. Helms:
I would like this letter to act as the initial step acknowledging the requirement for improvements
to take place along the City of Campbell's streets and intersections pursuant to the conditions
of approval for the Campbell Plaza Shopping Center renovation.
It is our understanding that the City of Campbell's Public Works Department will provide the
design work and the development of the Construction Documents for Bidding and Constructing
the work. These street improvements include all modifications indicated in the Staff Report to
the Planning Commission dated February 12, 1991.
We are also interested in being advised as to the proper monetary apportionment for these
servIces.
Thank you very much for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
MBH Architects
~~ /I\J!~
(~hn McNulty, AlA '--0
Principal
cc:
Laurie D' Allesandro
Joe Kinn
Gil Ulricksen
Debbie Brown
Joe Castello
Gary Krueger
Eddy Shen
McNulty' Briskman . Heath
1305 Marina Village Park\\av, Suite 101. Alameda, California 94501
415 K65'K6h3, Fax 415 K65.1611
MEMORANDUM
~<' Of C4"-1Pa
" c
*- O.'~"O ,.-,
, ,,,,
(; . -' . *
I;,. ~J
A')& ~,.~
t:, (~
l (P-,-\\
CITY OF CAMPBELL
To:
DistriJ:ution
Date:
January 21, 1991
From:
steve piasecki
Director of Plann:in:J
RECrTI~V~r')
\) J-.'~ t "~ I...' i.,
Subject: Revised Plans - Canpbell Plaza Shcg:>irg Center Re100del -
2365 winchester Blvd. - S 90-12
Pub(;~ ..~. .. ..",.Iiioering
Attached please firrl full scale, revised drawirgs of the Canpbell Plaza
Shoppirg Center rem:xiel. '!his item is scheduled for the Plannin:J
Commission meetirg of January 22, 1991.
'lhese are revised plans that reflect the changes of the DRe
(Developrrent Review Committee) meeting of Monday, January 14, 1991, am
the SARC (Site am Architectural Review Committee) meeting of Tuesday,
January 15, 1991.
Please review am fo:rward any conm:mts as soon as possible to the
Plannin:J Depart:rrent.
DistriJ:ution:
Building Depart:rrent
Fire Departm::mt
Public WOrks Departmentf
MEMORANDUM
~" 0\ (4",~,~,.
* 0""'0" .
' (,,,
, .' *
v
~~, ~J
a~1 ' ;.~
{ C p..\. \\
CITY OF CAMPBELL
Tim Haley Date: December 11 (,.._.1~9L-'-r"'--'---"---'
Planner II 'IM\""r"'y , 1'~"'Il'''''' ! !
! H l..w,:nl~L.!: "';'.:~~:~_ '._J
.I~ ' I' I
Nichelle Quinney r I HELMS ' ,:>~rJ';jiO-l
Associate Engineer IJOC"O~- - ,;.~~ _.~ I
Subject, PL:'N REVIEW FOR 590-11 AND 590-12; CAMPBELL pt~E'R ' · ~d._0-~~ ~
I PENOYER , '
_._., ~ _ ____L.J
-------------------------------------------------- -------
To:
From:
Please be advised that Public Works cannot comment on the
proposed applica~ion for remodeling of the Campbell Plaza until a
traffic impact study has been provided for our review. The
applicant should contact the City's Traffic Engineer, Gary
Kruger. for specifics required in the study. Gary'can be
reached at 866-2154.
The study should include the proposed Safeway expansion to 46,000
square feet and the proposed future 8,000 square foot addition.
Other ite~s to be covered are:
Impact on LOS for a.m., p.m. and midday peaks. (Using the
1985 Highway Capacity Manual, Operations and Design method
for these calcula~ions.) Any increase in delay beyond 2
secones is considered "significant".
Traffic irr:pacts other than LOS also need to be addressed:
the high number of ped accidents at this intersection, the
need for a protected left turn phase and right turn island.
the queuing of traffic to the west blocking the first
driveway, the addition of traffic on Budd at San TODas
Expressway, the need for left turn phases at Budd and Sa~
Thomas Expressway, the protection of school children a~ the
school bus stop on Nido, and the need to keep truck traffic
off of Nido.
Traffic accidents on Winchester and the adequacy of the two-
way left turn lane will need to be addressed.
We support construction of concrete bus pads and bus duckou~s o~
Winchester, but the location(s} will need to be coordinated with
Santa Clara County Transit Agency.
We are not in support of the driveways on Nido being available
for truck traffic for access to the loading docks. Closure of
these driveways is recommended.
Please let us know if you have any questions regarding the
infor~ation needed prior to our review.
DEPARTMENT COMMENT SHEET
SITE 81 ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
PLANNING COMMISSION
Date Sent Out: 12-6-90
Planning Commission
Agenda Date: 1-8-91
Please Return By: 12=1.1-90
p{ ] Original Submittal
[] Revised Submittal
DEe 0 G 1990
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
Architect
Fire Department
Police Department
Redevelopment Agenc'y
Public Works Department:
Engineering
Corporation Yard
Building Division
**1 E eEl V E D
Public Works/Engineering
APPLICANT: MBH Architects TELEPHONE: 415/865-8663
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2341-2391 S. Winchester Blvd/Campbell Plaza Shopping-
PROPOSAL:
S 90-11 Public Hearing to consider the application of John McNulty, on
behalf of MBH Architects" for approval of a Site and Architectural
application to allow the construction of a new Safeway store and
the remodel of a portion of an existing shopping center located on
properties known as 2341-2391 S. Winchester Blvd. in a .
C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. APN: 305-36-6,7
DEPARTMENTAL RECOMMENDATIONS:
CODE REQUIREMENTS (IF RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL):
I, Dba\ :1' ){Cc;,Jo-\;Dn 0""11'"1"\/
1c. n1cll{v- Jr/~eu..\~Y!l ~
J
r'L(,,/df Div..O: & 0((..} /),;;/ jJ":l/. t:J(.~.;;; a.lull c.',
f
- .' j,? .' ": i., ..... (7)
",,/,",: " f . ! t .1._ j ,.~. . C r
- /Q/n! ";'(' C Vi " 1>, .' \' sl/I!':" I C/. c', ,1 , a /VL/) V. 7) ,1 i' .;tv ,i~{ l' .. l;;/
c{ ,_p('~) ,j I
-- ;2.( ( (>1 .,,: ;'(/ I /' L :~~~:~ ) t) ~ ':{ I." / J~ /".'
- ' / '
501('-t,
- K.' '. ..,'
e_.f. iole.' '.
.~/"
'-<if
., ,',;,J
- ~ fL?(l,.),c:
i
.~ ! J (IJ l~--tt?-( " I'/t' .' , . / .:' ,"I ,,' .:, .;\
-- ~(~P . i ,J fOCI-' tit. t I) e /( (.j(
I}'/\ 0),"11 'I.'.,
\ L"'" "",'"
pi AA^--"
;-4,
ENVIRONMENT AL REVIEW:
The Planning Department has conducted an initial environmental study for this
proposal, and '
LX] A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this proposal.
[] A Categorical Exemption has been prepared for this proposal.
If your Department is of the opinion that additional environmental review is required,
please attach an Environmental Impact Assessment Initial Study identifying your
area(s) of concern.
**Any environmental comments should be returned by: December 11, 1990.
DEPARTMENT COMMENT SHEET
SITE &; ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
PLANNING COMMISSION
Date Sent Out: 12/5/90
Planning Commission
Agenda Date: 1/8/91
Please Return By: 12/21/90
..J. E eEl V E D
'I I '\\..lUO
[) t. C~ U \) '-' ::J
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ X Original Submittal
[] Revised Submittal
2ublic WQrlll/E:ngineering
APPLICANT:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
Architect
Fire Department
Police Department
Redevelopment Agency
Public Works Department:
Engineering
Corporation Yard
Building Division
Mr. Eddy Shen(LRS Assoc)
2395-2505 S. Winchester Blvd.
TELEPHONE:
745-0331
PROPOSAL:
S 90-12
Shen, E.
Public hearing to consider the application of Mr. Eddy Shen on
behalf of LRS ASIDciates for approval of a Site and Architectural
application to allow the remodel of an existing shopping center,
located on properties known as 2395-2505 S. Winchester Blvd., in
a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. APN: 305-36-3,4,5
DEPAR TMENT AL RECOMMENDATIONS:
CODE REQUIREMENTS (IF RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL):
(\ c. \ I_~ d Coe net.<) b'1" J;~" 1v tA~-.r! (. ,l (' I\UlIJU',~
(J>{>\\'; 1> r {) V ! d~i ; ',\,1)\ f': .1
(, ,(
'-/(( (,\, \ ";(1. I, I
,--(,,', ,
Db,),"!, >
O:',ll( ,
)
L ,~, "( it
-h, l:.{
-11'1 \l Il,dl, l~.
}{.{
,1,3
, '. J , I'
1'.1" J,.t,
(XC (l ',M"
It,'
!, r\
\ )<'I'} , I"~ " ' ":' 4,) ( ," (
\ lel, ~'6 -I.)' i
v ' ,,/
(It -
I'
pi,,-I .1.'"
~. /' ,-':' " i " VI",..... ,
\
l,) .1 ~~
i' "r
b ~.
".r.."t/'.,
(t-' r: Y'
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
The Planning Department has conducted an initial environmental study for this
proposal, and
[X] A Negative Declaration has been prepared for this proposal.
[] A Categorical Exemption has been prepared for this proposal.
If your Department is of the opinion that additional environmental review is required,
please attach an Environmental Impact Assessment Initial Study identifying your
area(s) of concern.
** Any environmental' comments should be returned by:
December 11, 1990
MEMORANDUM
"~<-\ Of C4"-1p6'"
* ""..., "
.' ""
I~ < .' ' *
~-'J ;~
<TE, (;~
1 C p..\\\
CITY OF CAMPBELL
To:
From:
Michelle Quinney
Associate civil Engineer
Gary Kruger, Traffic Engineer ~
Date:
January 22, 1991
(G>>-o
Subject:
Recommended Conditions, Safeway/Campbell Plaza Development
I have reviewed the Bankston/Pine Associates, Inc.
traffic report including the supplemental accident analysis
dated January 18, 1991. I believe the report is complete and
factual. I have reached somewhat different conclusions than
the authors on the basis of city policy regarding pedestrians
and traffic safety generally. These form the basis for my
recommended conditions on permitting the development.
Recommendations:
1. I recommend that left turns be prevented from entering
or leaving the northernmost driveway (driveway #1 in the
traffic report). This can be done in a number of ways: a
raised median, a painted non-traversable median or a
driveway design oriented to force right turns in and
out. Left turns into Campbell Plaza could be allowed at
the southern driveway (ie. driveway #3).
2. I recommend that both driveway #1 and #3 have
deceleration lanes designed into the site plan. The
deceleration lanes should be 10 feet wide at a minimum,
and 120 feet long with a 90 foot transition from the
existing curb location. Total length of each
deceleration lane and transition, then, would be 210
feet with a minimum of a 10 foot radius return at the
driveway. The bus duckout for the stop just south of
Budd could be combined with the deceleration lane. I
realize that this increases the bus/traffic conflicts,
but the low number of busses per hour will not result in
any actual increase in traffic hazards for busses and
cars turning right into the driveway. I believe that the
busses could stop in advance of the driveway. The
deceleration lane at this location would need to conform
to county duckout design standards which, to the extent
they exceed the requirements I stated above, would
govern the actual design. The transit authority should
be contacted for advice.
GEK: CMBLMEMO.311
Michelle Quinney, Safeway Development
January 22, 1991
Page 2
3. I recommend that Budd be restriped to provide one 11
foot right turn only lane and one 11 foot left turn only
lane for eastbound traffic. This slightly modifies the
traffic consultant's recommendations in that they
suggest a shared right and left turn lane. I have
recalculated capacity and levels of service with this
alternate configuration, and the level of service
remains unchanged (ie. LOS B in the p.m. peak). Parking
will need to be prohibited between Driveway #2 on Budd
and Winchester with red painted curb or signs
prohibiting stopping or parking.
4. I recommend that a protected left turn signal phase be
added for northbound left turns from Winchester to Budd.
This is necessitated by the restrictions on left turns
into driveway #1 and the need to protect pedestrians
from unobservant drivers attempting left turns against
oncoming traffic. The addition of the left turn traffic
exceeds the capacity of the unprotected left turns and
increases pedestrian accident hazards at the
intersection. A new signal standard and mast arm will be
needed on the northeast corner.
5. I recommend that a right turn arrow signal head be
provided for eastbound right turns. Right turns would be
prohibited on red, but we would program an overlap and
allow eastbound right turns at the same time we serve
northbound protected left turns. Northbound u-turns
would be prohibited, and an illuminated sign would be
needed for this restriction, installed on the new mast
arm and signal standard on the northeast corner.
6. I agree that the northbound left turn lane should be
lengthened on Winchester at Budd, but the length should
be increased from 60 feet to 175 feet due to the
anticipated increase in left turns due to restrictions
on the driveways.
7. The bus stop at the south end of Campbell Plaza will
need to be moved south to the new signalized
intersection of Camden and Winchester. However, this
should not be made a condition for this permit. The need
for moving the bus stop is based upon city actions to
remove the midblock crosswalk and signalize a new
intersection nearby.
GEK: CMBLMEMO.311
Michelle Quinney, Safeway Development
January 22, 1991
Page 3
Rationale:
My recommendations diverge from the consultants due to a
different emphasis on traffic policy by the City of Campbell.
We have an adopted pedestrian safety program which has, as
two of its strategies, the provision of protected left turns
at all signalized intersections and efforts to control right-
turn-on-red pedestrian accidents. In this case, the provision
of the right turn signal and prohibition of right turns on
red is consistent with the policy. The pedestrian accident at
this intersection was of this type, and accidents prior to
1988 also involve left turning vehicles into pedestrians.
The 1990 accidents, are unfortunately, under-reported in
our database, so I believe there is a good chance that some
accidents at the driveways were just not included this past
year. This finding was only made during our safety audit on
January 17th by the University of California research team.
There is a clear pattern of driveway related accidents, and
the additional traffic volumes will certainly exacerbate
these problems. The point is, they are correctable accidents,
and I recommend that we move to correct them. The
restrictions on left turns in are not too onerous in that the
motorists attempting to get to Safeway will be able to turn
left at Budd with a protected left turn phase.
Basically, we place higher value on correcting accident
problems when it is clear they can be corrected.
GEK: CMBLMEMO.311
P iai
"
"~"h ,
/ ~'y!(I/f../ /4
Bankston/Pine Associates, Inc.!~ ~ ,rr: IS' n ~/I ~ ~
JAN ~ ~ 1~~1 .
2030 Addison Street, Suite 310
Berkeley, CaIlYornla 94704
(415) 843-9746
i;ITY or:- C.i\l\iPDELL
"'l,c..NNII\!G DEPARTMENT
6265 Rose Lake Avenue
San Diego, California 92119
(619) 465-3720
FACSIMilE TRANSMITTAL FORM
l- z.. t -~ (
S+e"~ p,' ~ ~~ck;
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
l<en ~~~~s+o~
S,J<-",,~,,\ - uw~Pl"z 'l
A cc j d e.-\+ AI\. "I '\ ~ i <;.
SUBJECT:
NOTES:
NUMBER OF PAGES TRANSMITTED: JL Oncluding transmittal page)
-4J ~ Mt. WeAl ~ 'Ie r '" e s+i"d ~rl + ~,'~ hv-
~OIA~
REPLY:
Telephone: (415) 843-9746
Facsimile: (415) 843-1221
P 02
Bankston/Pine Associates, Inc.
2030 Addison Street, Suite 310
Berkeley, California 94704
(415) 843-9746
January 18, 1991
Mr. John Mc Nulty
MBH Architects
1305 Marina Village Parkway, Ste. 101
Alameda, California 94501
SUBJECT: Safeway 1293, Project No. 90037, Campbell (1297-90)
Dear Mr. Mc Nulty:
Findings from the three year (1988-1990) accident analysis of our traffic study for the
Subject Project indicate that of the thirty-four accidents occurring at or near the
intersection of Winchester Boulevard and Budd Avenue, most were occurring on
Winchester Boulevard near the intersection and not at it. The City traffic engineer has
therefore requested further review and analysis of the accidents at the two Winchester
Boulevard driveways in the Campbell Plaza Shopping Center analyzed in the study.
These driveways are referred to as driveways 1 and 3 in the study. (See Figure 3 for
driveway locations.)
Each of the 34 accident records in the accident analysis are summarized by year, date,
and accident record number for analysis. (See Attachment 1.) The location and a brief
description of the accident is included.
Of the 34 accidents occurring in the 3 year period under study, 23 were on Winchester
Boulevard. Seven of these Winchester Boulevard accidents were in the vicinity of
Campbell Plaza Driveways #1 and #3. Of these, 5 accidents occurred while vehicles
were entering or leaving Driveways #1 and #3. Attachments 2, 3, and 4 provide
detailed information on the 7 accidents.
Year 1990 accidents occurring at or in the nearby vicinity of Driveways #1 and #3 have
the following characteristics (See Attachment No.2):
Accident of 9/14/90 (referred to as accident #1) - This sideswipe collision occurred in
the northbound lanes and is not related to the Campbell Plaza Driveways.
Accident of 1/23/90 (#2) - This non-injury, right angle collision accident was caused by
V-I (driver inattention). V-I was exiting DW #1, failed to see V-2, and ran into V-2.
Year 1989 accidents are described here (See Attachment 3.): Accident of 712/89
(#1) - V-I made an unsafe left turn into DW #1 from the median turn lane.
...,-_______._...:__ T"II___:__ __--1 T__.&Z:_ r__:____:__ """___..140__4._
P 133
Page Two.
Mr. McNulty
January 18, 1991
Driver (D-l) was cited for failure to yield right of way to V-2. V-2 was cited for
driving at an unsafe speed for conditions. There was major damage to the vehicles but
no injuries.
Accident of 7/18/89 (#2) - V-I rwended V-2 as V-2 was southbound turning into DW
#3. Driver 0-1 was cited for driving too fast for conditions. Persons in V-2 were
injured.
Accident of 8/25/89 (#3) - V-I struck V-2 as V-I was exiting DW #3. Driver D-l was
cited for failure to yield. There were no injuries.
Accident of 12/28/89 (#4) - As V-I was exiting normally from DW #1 making a right
turn, V-2 overtook V-I in a similar maneuver and struck V-I. V-2 then fled the scene
(HIT and RUN). Driver D-2 caused the accident. There were no injuries.
Year 1988 Accidents are shown below: (See Attachment #4.)
Accident of 2/12/88 (#1) - This right angle collision was caused by inattention of
Driver 0-1 of V-I. V-2 was travelling northbound in the number I lane and attempted
but was unable to avoid being struck by V-I. There were no injuries. This accident is
not related to DW #1 or DW #3. There were no injuries.
CONCLUSIONS
Of the 5 reported accidents at the subject driveways, there was 1 accident in 1990 and 4
in 1989. There were no accidents at the driveways in 1988. Of the 5 accidents, 1
involved a vehicle northbound in the median left turn lane. This was caused mainly by
a speeding southbound vehicle. The other 4 accidents involved vehicles either entering
or exiting the driveways.
In our opinion, the number and severity of accidents for the 3 year period is not is not
significant. The principal causes of these accidents are driving too fast for conditions
on Winchester Boulevad and inattention on the part of most drivers involved. We
therefore continue to support the recommendations in our January 1991 traffic study.
Sincerely,
BANKSTON / PINE ASSOCIATES, INC.
~Ml~~
Kenneth M. Bankston, P .E.
RCE 13846 TE 316
P 04
-
-
J JL
~ i
(J.~~ ~ ~ f'1 f<- -:-: S" ~ ~ +
-1fL~~/Q7k.ht..,4Lc-,,- ___,,_ _ _~__
In '2 ~i_1 0-" 0."- .... .':" 1:1"" II
. iO, 36 /~ S-"\."JA~. R~'.r'.\..-ic ~ t""dd.
--, ../3.'tO-----u,.,. ~.Ito,,~ t)1I.)-lt~-- -- ----.
cO...l2...'t W"cL __i~5~d .
R~\~ ~ -tc
wl...c.b~v IB~d
1:V.;.'.. PYll ~~, ~
_ Ht~l~:-
-1-.---1-- --
2. qo.tr4-20 __l,^~ ~ 4. 4! '" J....j", ~; I"~ '( l.J;.,.ol... j/fl/ I i}t
1- ,<f-~o 't~'^ off .,..i1d +. e...Jj
t'%.oO ~"L So \'0 &+~
-----.---1..._ q b -O.,,-~/ R.u.... ....J t"'. ~~ - --- -x--_.
I-/l-~O D'I c.;~L (... y ts r w,..( W :"'~~.-4~
-_.. --~t;.,;ft:r-1~ ... ~.~"'...!Jill"~\o"'~ ___ - - --- f--- --
...--..---. ..-.-- '---- ----.--.-
t. qo.031f3 vQ,h!p,-d y "g~dJ ,. fpn _ X
--.- l"'I~-'tO fed 'j(l~i. ~\J.~~ . - -- --
t~ w;y.<.t~s~
1/ () r;. fiu t sh...C'..~~.... \~~ h.l".....~~
( M\.... ~cA ~, ~;v~\- ..
~~w
:5, C\ O-~'O'l ~~ iJ;.,....~e~~"..J!" 1 ,J...~tlf {(XI Y..
: 9.2.~-I:\O ~...'^ 'ft ~ t... Cf h. \ ,
th.ul( B,,\ \I"'~+Iv.r",,'~ r lAd d.
Q~*Q I S~t ,. - ,
1.f., ,....-- ,..P......
"
,. 9 e_-. ~l ~~ ~~i- v v.. yo, ~(('I'JrW ? NoV\~ >(
. 01,-. ln4- 6
I .... ... ,,,H... ,l,,t\e,,
C\\ Z'3 ~ S
7. 9 0 - I 0 "s ~I< ~-r ~d~y y wi.,.Jr.dw X
~fr, ,~ -- _.-
1-\1-'\0 s ~ v.) ,.... ..k~~ f'
-----.-I-~'tk..I_~~ e;l C,l""';" " ~oJ
-------- -'- --- ------
'Cr~rs! - -- --..-. ~......_.. '--".-.-
6. GH'sl'''' jl... ~J.;c\1t'I ~ uJll,J'i(~"'" -. >\- -
1" 1...&iL
'-- --kWl",d~ v- o~ E( u"-\,'.,.",to -- ----
Ib4 ~ /)~~ Q-\ C\ / c~ ~,V\;h
I .-- -.--- --
---. '---- .--.--- ..--. - _. - .. -- . -. -
~. qo -41 '23 p(\~ k \~~~ Y 1J 0'4\ Q _..'>5:...
1- S-<tl) 11' (. ,';;;' _._- --~
i' J 1Ilf5 11h~"~ . '2..'Z~O $. Wi"'tl"'-J~ ;
--_. ----
I , I
~~ ~~ lX,~~r'4
P 05
'"'9' yo D" t i t.l ~ ..\------- 'jt$ . tAJ\~ ' . ~_
-_. -'-_.._----_.._~._-,.__.._-- ,... -- .--.-.- - ---
--_ _.__ __.1~.I__:t _q ~_~ ~ _3. __ t . 1 ("1 L J;Vlcl'\l!:fw .~-
- -- . - .... -- uJ t 1.1l.-~jJ~~ .~-_. - -- '-"d+ "#~1 --- -~.. -
11- jO. 0 I r, M.d e or w:~:lu~ _ v
____-....11~ 7 / s:-L______ --- - --- - _.
r
------..-- - -
II, qe.. \1-;3 ~;J.. r y' LJ ,',AC t.R~i. X
~ oJJ;e~ ISO <.
-
J-t1-ctO cf g~.JJ .:-. J,l.ylt( .d~"
11.^", 1<.. ,..1..
.. I \
: \2. <\0- ISB \ Pcl(~i1\'" L,+ Acc\.jv~ N tV f) VI.(J X
II: 3-\ 'l..~\) O'r\e ,;..k ~c,..b:.i l'I~J
," z.o I t!\o V\ to, ... , ,. \ ~ ,-
I'
-
~ .--- ......." --
f :~:l3) q 0- ~5'1L; ? tJe~;/€( ccl\;Je Y uJ iW\che ~l~ I X.
...
V q./''ti(V i" L,)~ ~/'~ I'\~ e 2001 !. .t I
I. /'tZO r f( ; \ 'B~~d
, ttC<:'1 ~~\. .
II! . '-... .,,/
!II
i li '10-ft;U Ve. h I t^/e, .~w'~.tv\" ~ M,^~ X
i;;IIf.
I" ,- 3 0 -j \J ir P....., ~,...~ ~.'?
,.
., "51../ }.,,~ .l t.3~; W ,'~,':,,<. w.
.I'
I!I ."-
:1: -
.,..- ""'\
~ oi; :.) ~ / I,J i., C '\t~ +t'Y" \ X
;:!l;. ere' o~3.3 \J~ ~ t..A;""" DW -10
rr--' 1'"l1-'10 ~k~'I\.h.u+e (' 100 r $Q ( 100 I So cf- j
/41 t; 1-r1A #.~ cf 6 ~J RtAdd I
I ~ . ~ /,
"
,I'
I
iii
II'
III
I.
"1
I
Ii:
..!
.,,,.....-
III
1': - -
II
~ -
- -
i'l
oj
,
1.1
.
,
-- --
A.<:<: ~ l.'~
Q '~I \- h ~
~
f~?-e
.t
.~
~
~
~
S~~
~{,,~~ -h
~ifl(.t~~-ky AIl.1{
~ I'r ~ ~ 0 ~'i ~ .,..
;1fr J:t t 1) ~ \ W II,' c.l ~ s-f'! V"
d... - f . · ,....~ ~
~<:c. ~ j~ ~ ~.e
Q~...\ ~!'D^~ hi "l J~ ~
...-.. --.---..-.-----..- _._-------~~------- ----
1. &9- 067
- .._- ._- _ ......... __.__.______._ '''_h''___,_ _.__...
1- 3/- e ~
~1J#-f~"
2.
3, e~ - f'f I
, - 30' 8'
II (Jq 10 / f.,;
{
...,
.~
I
: .
"b. S9., G'f3
B-II-e~
'to ~ I
I
l'
WB. 8(/- 660
q. Z,Cf- /1
I i 1/4(-0 .I Fyi
1/1
La
.q. gq~ t,q
/0-; -$9
"'5 ~
.1_U'2\'._. ...
~o(~,,~<'V'
Z. ve~
R~ -( @oI/'JE'/
P 06
.~ ~(~~~ -h
~
~ ~iv.ct~.s-kV' A,,1L
~ tJ- ~ A-6 ~T~.....
5tf'~ _:r~~ rA!~t lJo__
y l,Ui.0..\~~(.. \ X
--- ..--.-..-- - ..--- .....-. "-". \...-.-
"t c IJ ~....~,
---.-. ,-- -----
~
^
g", J/ !rrJe
300' w/o
t". ..l'1' lfY
II (!
t. \.
f.t.~ O!v.,../
3 v~ h
~Q....J'.e,..... ,~,'
Ve.""- hi~w:, 'i)w
~f(",.1c. ~~ ~l...d....> ~'1
\lQ. h
L-c.>. V' "- d. ~''^~ ~
c.llll,' s....",
L~/f t~v.. c..1l.fle"\
w,.~ c~Q.5h I ~ "wIJ.l.,
w;" c I. ~ ~ f '..oJ
c..-t- Ko.".... "'i -I
'/..
y
x..
'(~,.
. .'--\"
~illlcllP~ h- '\
6001 S"t O~ ,
f3 l'I J ~ //"
)(
......---_...~ ..
.y
x
~
P 137
~.\" n" ( jl\l ~' ~ _'t~~ ~~~ I ..~~__
--- -~._- ~--_..._---_.- .' . -_... ---- ~.._-------- -,.. - -..----
--_.. ...--..... ....... .--.. ........ ----- ... ...- ...... ." ... --- ------..- - '.-. -_... ...---.-........ - . _.. .. --.. .. ... -.-. -
ID, gCf .66~1 I,-(f f.~ '{ l'" (1)//,.(;., ~ ~,~" !~, tl- -'{
--------..-. -7r'-=-~r------- ~1""CJ.e.de, /I!r;.c. i, ...---- -_.
____ _~ed. ~ ~e ~j " . .
-
-- ._. - -
II. E9- bbtffJ FIt,("'.,.. -h "I1',,(d '( U J ;v' ~I .. $ kv / '-L
J1.g-~'t ~/lN ~"'t,J '1 f
O(5"lO !1oJ..'J ..-
.- -- "'""'""'-
~ II I~) ~9-7$1" II,f n,,..J df ~ / {)),'~d,~ Sk.,. ~. )(
Y:.'~t\ I
............ /7..1-6' 9'1 P"l 300 I 50 of ,1 \ .~: J' f'
I ov $"0.,:,....
I'fGD /lhlAr- grJ:Jd 4/ ;' - C' I --
,.., ~ \ "'Ir"""~ ,
.. -
" ,/'
I'
"
:!
"i
; , .
j'.
:1'
IL
H~
.'1
, ~ i
If'
. ,
I -
d
11-...--.
ii'
:I!
III
,"
" - - --
IIi
,,!
II'
.1
,.
j,:
I
II'
" - -
.
I'
I - -
'II
I,
-- I
I,;
"
i:; -
. ! . ~
I"
III
Iii
~C:~ ~ J.~
Q \./ ~ h ~
~
f~"\>.e
~
.~
~
~
~ St ~
~ ((\~~ -h
~i~(t~$~~V ~...l(
~J-~ Pro ~Tf~
P 08
~((. \ ,(...~
R9.~C'\ "!D.\'r~_ hi ,,= b: 'I
~
-r~\>.e
...
- '.1
.......'
,
~
~
S~"~Q t-
~J,",,,'t ~ to
\,I.ji\' '\:E'S~-W A,J(
1: t+ ~ ~ ~ ~'( ~ ....
_y~.~ ~~,~t; IJo
I
@a-O)7 _
1/1.' B ~
- .---. --I'l5 0 ! l.,;
- ' . ..-"",
. ve.h:_..~.~+.\'~1. _ [N._._ - --- . .. t(./.'. - ~~~~(~J~v' I .
.__~::~.~~~I?~~;+.~wI. -.-.. ._- -.~~d.i~~ - .-' ----- ~.
hit rJ R. v.hvc\Os1e. .
Vt.t...-----.---.. .--- ---.- -... .---.--...-.-. . - . ---. --.---
.. __ _'__. __.. __. - . n' _.___. .___ _. .___u ____. _____.._\'~~""'.-.-.---.--.-------- '-- ---
- - P- _1-_, ~_~I~__D~~____ ----- ~t-~-t;.i~-;s~~- ~ -/7:~:~Oi. -- - X
__. __ _ __ ,..' 1~17l5tJ. f.--. - . -- -.-- -- ___~~._A<:l. _~_~!:.F9",..t~.bo>'\~ _.~\.:~c..~~__ --- ----
lV\ait'!',^'h~'", IIIC,.VQ>>'\'(j
__.__ _._ _._____..._____ ._ ______ .______~.~C'l<!Io,l"l.+--=-.C-..u1.J-h.~~-------.---.u .- .____.
.______2.~S- ~~._________..______.HJ.QV\J_ <~~__._?___IiJ~~~n __ __.. >\..
1-f-(5-SS ?ea-l evJ"lv ~t e J
-.-- -.----11.1 'r/ Fn----- __._____~.~i-lo'.c.~f~v-----~~.i- ---- --.--
-----4~.. BS-~~5 ~.--n-.----.--.-. .-;:~- ~~::~~i '~~~--y' Wi~"k(~~'. ^
___h ---. ---.7~Z9:-6.e;---- ---.-._--.------i~100~-,0.t;)- ~ \ Jg-~'f'"\'- -- ---
- ----------. - 1500 1~>rL . .---.-.-. - . ---- .{~~\~;.V. +~c~k~f~;/;J---- --..---f?>~i.L.-r--- .-------
_'_'~~ _._ __ ,.. _. ___ "0. '_._h _ .."_ _ ___ _. _.___._ __ .._._ _... _'. _. _.___.__ ..__.___.._______.___ _~_. ._...... 'n<__
---n-~~~:-sE)i7~~=------~~---_i;~;;~~.~~~-~~y' -~~;~~:f~~ ----= ~
---_____ ~.. . /1'W 1~<2d. --- '.----No. .~t--..13\ol~-d. H:+"---- _nO g~.J-J---- u_.. ---.
PGI ..,. k.~ d C."l--r
.. ...c,.. _€_~ ~.~_~~-----....--u--.------J...i1.-b..'!-!'-.~f!I.ft ~~_.{_._..___W~~~t.\.~~_ ___ _.._ ~
JO'II-~o ~ \ \
I HI'".J'-'st~" ~~ IL~.t..Ui ~ t.~.'t-QO
...__. ... '-Lfl.':/... ._rw.:, __ _ ... _____.____ ___ .______ __. __. _ .__. .__.______. _ _ _...__. - ---.-- .--
r1 g~-10(
~ _ __ ____ ____ .....l..J__.. -.. #-.- ~ . --.
II. Z~.6'~
-- --'.'--ZI't5/~ue"
$~ 1),},:...c.\\I!~+V tk.h V ~.~(.~ d
---.------ _..' --_. .--.. -----",,-----1-.-. ---------..
-t....v~.. L"s.+ hi D ~, 11 ~, 6 f-
...__.0 t-e,^,~l A lJ..e:~T1.1 ~S:__ '__'__ i3 \4..J L. 0-_
N ~ 'f'J:V'''~.)~o( Uo k
.x.
P IH
r ~
I. I z
. I n
:r:
m
NORTH ~
:a
fn I m
fI)~ 0
i~ c
I I ~
m)li I q 90
'< f :D
~ ~J a
I . I
CAMPBELL PLAZA ,;., @ J
DW#1 ) I
I I I I
I I
I I I
I [
I I I f
I I I I
--
-
,,-
-.H
0 I
I I I
I II
CAMPBELL PLAZA I . ATI'ACHMENT 2
DW :M- ~
P 1 e
- I . -
I :i
. I I z
I ()
:z:
m
NORTH ~
en I :II
0l;; m.
~~ \~~'l 0
I c
- ~
m)li
<
I
0
CAMPBELL PLAZA
DW#1
,
I
I I I
I
-
-
,,-
-.N
o
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I
I I I
y-\
CAMPBELL PLAZA
[
I .
!
I I I . z
. I n
i
. NORTH i
=~ I aI.
I 0
I qse I I i
ii
;.------
"< I
I c.
CAMPBELL PLAZA I . $+ L"\C1'.
I
DW#1
, I
I
I I I
I C"
I I I
I
I I I I
-..
....
,,-
~ I
0
I I I
I I
I .1
CAMPBELL PLAZA I I .
____~\l_
BlJDD AVE.
,
~"
-l
~
~
<1"
"
UJ
j
A
EXHIBIT 1
TRAFFIC CONTROL
BEFORE SAFEWAY EXPANSION
I
I ~m
I
I
I
I
I !
I ~ 1
I
,
I l~i
:~I
I I
I I
I
I I
I
ec' I ec'
:.:J (, :.:J (, I
I I
I I I
I
I 1 I
I I \..1
I I~I
I I
I I I
o
,
r'"' .
~
(.:D
rL
~
~
UJ
~
~
CJ
f---
~
f---1
f..
/
~
~
BUDD AVE.
~
/
....,
,"
~ Q
r-~__
W ~,,#..-'
-::l
~ ~
<~
UJ ~
~ r.Ll
E-
----d UJ
~I ~
i ::c
1 ~ C)
A ~
?--,
I---'
gFIC't'
, '.J J I
I I
\ I I
\ I
EXHIBIT ,) \ I I I
!-...J
TRAFFIC~ CONTROL I 1"1
AFTER SAFEWAY EXPANSION I I~I
I I
I I I
,,-
r
CITY OF CAMPBEll
70 NORTH FIRST STREET
C AMP BEL L, C A L I FOR N I A 9 5 0 0 8
(408) 866-2100
FAX # (408) 379-2572
Department:
Public Works
March 6, 1991
Al Shaghaghi
Majors Engineering, Inc.
FAX ONLY (415) 820-3892
Dear Mr. Shaghaghi:
I have reviewed your request to design the deceleration
right turn lane into the north driveway of proposed Safeway
expansion at Campbell Plaza and reluctantly agree with your
proposal. The shortened taper and lane length is below
recommended minimums (copy of the policy attached), but we
can support a 60 foot taper and 60 foot deceleration lane
length as we have marked on the plan you faxed us on March 5,
1991. Our review of the parking bay layout reveals that the
parking angle cannot be adjusted sufficiently to realign the
bays with the driveway location I proposed, and moving the
driveway further south will result in a potential for left
turns out of the driveway, something we wish to restrict.
Your solution as modified by us appears to be desirable.
One maj or change we insist on is that the
roadway intersecting the throat of the main drive
closed off. One means of accomplishing this is also
the marked-up version of the plan you sent us.
internal
must be
shown on
If you have further questions do not hesitate to contact
me at (408) 866-2154.
~1?1~'
Gary E. Kruger ,~
Traffic Engineer LJ
cc: Bill Helms, Engineering Manager
Michelle Quinney, Land Development Engineer
steve Piasecki, Planning Director
GEK: CMBLLETR.260
. !.'
'. '
^.. ...~
156
oJ-:t"
*.' ,
, '; ....},.,j<+, t~-~j.~:.r~; ~';t'#/.~~~
Chap. 6 / Access and Site Circulation
Paint stripe.
r 4 inches, yellow
I W3 W2
RI
I WI
~L2
L1--i
Departure geometry (feet)
all speeds
W c R2 L3 0
3
14 20 10 5
16 IS IS 5
16 20 0 0
~L3-1
Arterial
speed (mph)
45 desirabled
limiting"
40 desirable
limiting
35 desirable
limiting
Approach geometry (feet)
LI L a W b
2 I
120 250
100 130 r
120 190 r 12
90 100 12
90 120
60 60
W2C Rl
20
15
10
16
18
20
a Maneuver distance only; does not
include storage for more than one
vehicle.
bExcluding curb and gutter.
C Stripe to back of curb.
d 10 mph speed differential, 7 fps2
average maximum deceleration.
e IS mph speed differential, 9 fps2
average maximum deceleration.
r Any set of LI L2 values may be
used with any set of WI W2R 1
values.
Figure 6-2 Suggested design for undivided driveway access to
arterial streets. SOURCE: Vergil G. Stover [2].
Where the driveway spacing is less than that necessary to accommodate a right-turn
deceleration lane (Figure 6-4) and still have substantial lengths of curb between successive
driveways, a continuous right-turn lane should be considered (Figure 6-5). Any continuous
right-turn lane should terminate at signalized intersections. The termination should be
accomplished by a channelizing island which forces all traffic in the lane to turn right at
the intersection.
Whenever a channelizing island is used at the terminus of a right-turn bay or lane,
the inside curb return radius should be a minimum of 75 feet. This will provide an island
of sufficient size to allow for landscaping and enhanced visibility. The absolute minimum
radius necessary to provide for an island of minimum legal size is 50 feet.
Designs to Restrict Certain Movements
In some instances, it is desirable to prohibit certain movements through the use of
channelizing islands (Figure 6-6). Signing and pavement markings are not effective in
eliminating prohibited movements. The geometry must physically define and block the
movements which are prohibited. Use of a channelizing island which prohibits left turns
in and out (Figure 6-6) is suggested on arterials without a median and on one-way streets.
The installation of supplementary one-way drives reduces the number of turning
vehicles at a T-intersection on a divided arterial having a barrier median (Figure 6-7). The
supplementary drives might be installed to serve egress or ingress maneuvers or both.
,,:;; ~..
......'..
r t. ~,~,;: :j:-. '.~ ,~ E 3 E i; : + : + ~ ~""' + p ~
_ ~ .i.J.~tr.r;..u:
~ . .
,;. i.1 .~I
~
'V
\ \
\
\ \ \
\
I
J'
\~
-
w
,
,
.D
-
~
~
tt
~.t
1
.;.1
CD".,
~ .....~