The URL can be used to link to this page

3101 S. Winchester Blvd. (84-02) Santa Clara V,-...ey Water District ~ ~ftfJL May 15, 1984 '~e: ~ /' C' ~I 4~,~;/! v~.o Pu~ ' l/jt. r/~ I < /, C/fi~ ;P()B' 1t,f4/S' 5750 ALMADEN EXPRESSWAY SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95118 TELEPHONE (408) 265-2600 Mr. Arthur Kee Planning Director City of Campbell 70 North First Street Campbell, CA 95008 Attention Mr. Tim J. Haley, Planner II Dear Mr. Kee: We have reviewed the site plan for Winchester Business Center on Winchester Boulevard, File ZC84-02, sent to us on April 25. The site is within the San Tomas Aquino Creek and Page Ditch watersheds and not subject to flooding from any District facility. The property is also adjacent to the Page Percolation System Pond as shown on the enclosed marked site plan. The site's drainage should be incorporated into an existing storm drainage system. No drainage into the percolation pond can be allowed. In accordance with District Ordinance 75-6, the owner should show any exist- ing welles) on the plans and inform us regarding their proposed use. Please contact Mr. David Zozaya at 265-2600, extension 416, for information about well permits. Because it can affect the operation and maintenance of the percolation pond, grading adjacent to the right ot way shoula be done in aCl..urdi:ulc.e wi.i.-h District Detail Sheets 20-20B. The details of the grading should include cross-sectional views at the right of way and be shown on the improvement plans. As a condition of land development approval, the District right of way should be fenced because of the potential hazard associated with the pond. Chain link fence may be placed in accordance with SCVWD Detail Sheet 17. Any other type should be installed off District's right of way and maintained by others. Details of any fencing should be shown on the improvement plans. AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER Mr. Arthur Kee -2- May 15, 1984 Improvement plans should be sent for our review and issuance of a permit prior to start of site construction. Referenced detail sheets will be furnished upon request. Sincerely, ~,' :....'; :"'.:' ~^_..-_... W. F. Carlsen Division Engineer Design Coordination Division Enclosure: Marked Site Plan cc: Dennis Kobza & Associates, Inc. - w/enclosure 2483 Old Middlefield Way Mountain View, CA 94043 ~City of Campbell Public Works Department ORDINANCE NO. 1534 BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TIlE ZONING MAP OF 'TIlE CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA (ZC 84-02). The City Cormcil of the City of Campbell does ordain as follows: SECTION ONE: That the Zoning Map of the City of Campbell, together with amendments thereto, is hereby changed and amended. Said amendments being outlined on the map attached hereto entitled Exhibit A. SECTION 1WO: This ordinance shall become effective 30 days following its passage and adoption and shall be published once within 15 days upon passage and adoption in the San Jose Mercury News, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Campbell, Cormty of Santa Clara. PASSED AND AOOPTED this 16th day of October, 1984, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Cormcilmen: ChaIIber 1in, Ashv.urth, Kotowski, Podgorsek, Doetsch NOES: Cormcilmen: None ABSENT: Cormci1men: None APPROVED: (" '" ~'A :d ' I ", '/"""-1:' 2<'L /' ItiIPr:%e~ ,Sr., Mayor ATrnSr: gL~k 'filE, F0~EGOI~':G INSTRUMENT IS A TRUll r: r;:,:;,;:,CT COpy OF THE ORIGINAL ~_ I ::.L I, i "j. :::.:; eFFlcr::. {, ,:'cT' ;'.'1',"0 G, COYNE, CiTY CLERK :~"I()~~,~r(l~~-* OATED 10 /d-. <~/rR1 "'l'1'1'/"I'1\/j' 1'\1" HIl I,.J. ~~ -' j :...'-. '_~}'.1 _ _" 2'.,: __n..' _ ~_. fUflVl u \jJ Otz,~7 . r-, . I i r I I I J..'~" . 11 < !"-j. ~ . ,I I / ~~I ',,J J.L-~ I Lf!:dOI ~, " I. r--t ~ " I I ! \ .' \ \- \ / / .- / / ./ . .. PUBLIC HEARING HELD BEroRE 'lBE PLANNING I ~., mMISSION ON 8/28/84. RES. NO. 2286 ~-= RECD~.f.ffiNDING APPROVAL OF ZONE CHANGE FROM R-l-10 & C-2-S TO PD (PLANNED ~ 'Y7Z\:: 5-0-1 / M / --, ORDINANCE NO. 1535 BEING AN ORDINANCE OF TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF CAMPBELL APPROVING PLANS, ELEVATIONS, DEVELOrnENT SrnEIULE AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR A RESEARGl AND DEVELOPMENT BUILDING TO BE LOCATED AT 3101 S. WINrnESTER BOULEVARD IN A PD (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) ZONING DISTRICT. (APPLICATION OF MARaI DEVELOPMENT CO., ZC 84-02) The City Cormcil of the City of Campbell does ordain as follows: SECTION ONE: That the Zoning Map of the City of Campbell, being a part of the Campbell Municipal Code, together with amendments thereto, is hereby changed and amended by adopting Exhibit A entitled Plans and Elevations, Exhibit B entitled Development Schedule, Exhibit C entitled Map of Said Property, and Exhibit D entktled Conditions of Approval, as per the application of March Development Co. located at 3101 S. Winchester Boulevard. Copies of said exhibits are on file in the Office of the Planning Department. SECTION 1W0: This ordinance shall become effective 30 days following its passage and adoption and shall be published once within 15 days upon passage and adoption in the San Jose Mercury News, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Campbell, Cormty of Santa Clara. PASSED AND ADOPTED this l6thday of <Xtober, 1984, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Cormcilmen: Chamberlin, Ash\\Orth, KotONSki, Podgorsek, Doetsch NOES: Cormcilmen: None ABSENT: Cormcilmen: None , ~ " 1 ",' ~ /I APPROVED:~~l~h~~:f;:~. ,/~r ATTEST: ~, ..,~ ,'"-"'~'F'NT IS II TRU~ ~,u;:: r~o?"~c '1".1 .. ;:-:.: ',>-L":" ~iH:' ORIGINAL ;"! l. . EH'ECTlVE HAll','>> , -,'C _. :. 1, ,~,~~, C\lY C~ERK ~'^;-~?ii1flr~ l~ I~".... I EXHIBIT P - DEVELOR-ffiNT SCHEIULE MARCH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 14103-G WINCHESTER BLVD.. LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA 95030 . (408) 866-6466 April 12, 1984 City of Campbell Planning Commission 75 North Central Ave. Campbell, Ca 95008 Re: Property loca~ed between Walnut Dr and Winchester Blvd Regarding development schedule for above mentioned property, construction is scheduled to commence within six months from final approval by City of Campbell and completion one year after start of constuction. If you have any questions regardinq this matter, please contact me. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, MARCH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY BCE/gl f'r~ c-Cf~, I~f) Bruce C. Edwards ) DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE: ZC 84-02 APPLICANT: March Development Co. SITE ADDRESS: 3101 S. WINCHESTm BLVD. IT C - MAP OF SAID ERTI I I I J ...' 11 - , , 'I / i ~- i i 1-1 1..1----1' I Lf!{dOI ~, \ I. ~~ " I I ! r \ \ \- , \ / I // I ",/ . -( / ,. "'J. ..... / '- PUBLIC HEARING HELD BEFORE 1HE PLANNING ro.MISSION ON 8/28/84. RES. NO. 2287 REa::M1ENDING APPROVAL OF PLANS, ELEVA- TImS & DEVELOPMENT SCHEIULE 'IO ALLOW mNSlRUCfION OF OFFICE/RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT DING. (VOTE: 5-0-1). , . /: ", 1''' . M , . K EXHIBIT D CONDI T IONS OF APPROVAL: ZC 84-02 APPL I CAT ION OF: Kobza, D. SITE ADDRESS: 3101 S. Winchester Blvd. A N/A B c D E F r, H I J P C f{,TG: 8- 28-84 Revised elevations and/or site plan to be approved by the Planning Director upon recommendatlonot the Architectural Advisor, within 30 days of the Planning Commission approval. Revised elevations and/or site plan to be approved by the Site & Architectural Review Committee and/or the Planning Commission with- in 30 days of Planning Commission approval. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted for approval of the Site & Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to application for a building permit. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted for approval of the Planning Director prior to application for a building permit. Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be submitted for approval of the Planning Director prior to applica- tion for building permit. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $ 10,000 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing and strip- ing of parking areas prior to application for a building permit. Applicant to submit a plan, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening(if boxes are aboveground) for approval of the Planning Di recto r . Applicant to submit a letter, satisfactory to the City Attorney, limiting the use of the property to: _ 61,424 square feet of research. and _development use, prior to issu:.mce of a building permit. All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. Building occupancy will not be allowed until publiC improvements are installed. -nla: not applicable to this application. PAGE 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: ZC 84-02 APPLICATION OF: Kobza, D. SITE ADDRESS: 3101 S. Winchester Blvd. The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with Ordinance of the City of Campbell and Laws of the State of California. K L M N o p Q N/A N/A All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Section 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper ~uards. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and tele- vision cables, etc. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by the Building Depart- ment (Section 21.68.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code). Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apart- ment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire De- partment. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level. and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City re- quirements for the handicapped. Noise levels for the interior of residential units shall comply with minimum State (Title 25) and local standards as indicated in the Noise Element of the Campbell General Plan. Applicant is hereby notified that he will be required to pay Park Dedication In-Lieu Fee which will be assessed at the time the subdivision map is submitted. STANDARD FIRE HAZARD ABATEMENT COMMENT: The applicant is hereby notified that the property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures shall be kept secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolish- ed or removed from the property. Sect. 11.201 & 11.414, 1979 Ed. Uniform Fire Code. PAGE 3 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: ZC 84-02 APPLICATION OF: Kobza, D. SITE ADORESS: 3101 S. Winchester Blvd. FIRE DEPARTMENT R. Fireflow of 2,000 GPM shall be available from San Jose Water Co. S. Provide new nnmicipal fire hydrant on Winchester Blvd., 400 feet south of Hacienda Avenue. T. Driveway surrotmding the building shall be designated as fire lane with parking prohibited. U. Provide a signed staterent of intended occupancy. V. Storage & use of hazardous materials are prohibited in B- 2 occupancy. PLANNING DEPARniENT W. Applicant to satisfy all conditions of Santa Clara Valley Water District prior to occupancy. PUBLIC \\DR!CS DEPARTMENr X. Complete and file a parcel map. Y. Pay storm drainage area. fee. Z. Dedicate right-of-way and install street improvements on Winchester Blvd. and execute an agreement to improve Walnut Drive. AA. Driveways to be 35' width. The applicant is notified that he/she shall comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. r--______._.'_~~_::______:_______~ ._~_ __~,_ RECEIPT CITY OF CAMPBELL CAMPBELL. CALIFORNIA I ~ " ('),--1. f NAME ~~, " ',VL.. ~I"" 1'L-(,,'~ I'DDR'~:R ~~~~',,(' ~..~ ! II ~ .\.LL.ta ~' '--- A '1 ~ G:_-:J~ ~-, IJ ____ ' r ~ . I; --r- . j - '" '()""Y- 'FOR \~, ) " ,12A, V\tL..-- )/ ({L-<"AL /yQ .2.. \1.-- " pJ;rl i ~'S2) , LJ V , / t7 t-/- /7;; (; 0 REVENUE ACCOUNT NO. ::) 376 FUND NUMBER 0-. ~HECK o MONEY ORDER o CASH DATE AMOUNT ..,.,C'- THIS IIECEJPT MUST II MAOIINE VAUDAlED AND SlGHEDI8.OW. . 2941t2.-: ; ",8Yi :. ?~./:.. - '" .': ,,' ',-. ""'_~ . '-', '~"\~~;;"- '~,,:,'re.';.' ,t. ~,.7~:)~o-o ~;.~;~~/~ .~. -',- ~7.:. ...;;~ ',' - " ')0' _' ~ ." . > .. , . ~. . ,.", . . ;;CITY e .FINANC~D.f:PT.....;y.. " CITY OFc:AMPBELL L.. ~', .'.;:.;;...-' 'to, . I DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED MARCH DEVELOPMENT OFFICE PROJECT, 3101 S. WINCHESTER BOULEVARD CAMPBELL Prepared For: City Of Campbell August 10, 1984 Wilson & Porter Engineering Earth Metrics, Incorporated DRAFT ERV IRCJfMERT At. IMPACT REPORT FOR 'mE PROPOSED MARCH DEVPJ.OPMDT OFFICE PROJECT, 3101 soom WINCHESTER BOOLEV AID, CAMPBELL Prepared For: CI ty or Caapbell August 10, 1984 Wilson & Porter Eng1neering 10 Zoe Street, SUi te 200 San FranCisco, California 9"'101 (.lJ15)5.IJ3-.lJTTT and Earth MetzoiClS Incorporated 859 Cowan Road Burl 1 Dg8JIe , CalIfornia 9"'010 (.lJ15) 691-1103 SeQt.ion 1. 2. T ABLE OF CORTDTS PREFACE ..................................................... PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................... 1.1 1.2 1.3 Project Site Location and Characteristics .............. Project Description and Objectives ..................... Intended Use at the IIR ................................ SDMMlRY ..................................................... 2.1 2.2 2.3 Potential Impacts and Proposed M1 tip tiOD Measures ..... llternat1yes !valuated ................................. Identified Areas ot Controyersy ........................ 3. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, SmRIFICART DVIRatMERTM. EFFECTS, ARD MITm ATIOR MIUStJlES PROPOSED TO HIlfIMIZE mE .. .Eaa 111 1-1 1-1 1-1 1-4 2-1 2-1 2-1 2-1 SIGIIFICART EPPICTS ......................................... 3-1 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 5. 6. Land Use and PlaDD1ng .................................. Circulation and Parking ................................ Visual Qual1t, ......................................... Stora DrainaselWater Quality ........................... AI. TElUUTIVES 'l'O 'mE PROPOSED ACTIOR ......................... 10 Project ............................................. Mlzad Use DeY.10~.Dt .................................. smRIFICART DVDORMERTAL BrPECTS WHICH CJR1IOT BI AVOIDED IF mB PROPOSAL IS lMPL!MBlI'l'ID ...................... Glarm mDUCIRG IMPACTS OF mE PlOPOSID ACTIOR .............. 1. 8. 9. 10. 11. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS .......................................... EFFECTS ROT POUND TO BB smRIFICART ......................... IEFEIERCES: OllUlfIZATIORS, PUBLICATIOIS AID PllSatS CORSDLTED ................................................... PREP AIDS OF '1'HIS IEPORT .................................... APPBRDlCES .................................................. A. B. In1tial Study Traffic Study ........................................... ...... ..................................... 1 3-1 3-5 3-19 3-2' 4-1 4-1 __1 5-1 6-1 1-1 8-1 9-1 10-1 11-1 11-1 11-9 FiiUre 1-1. 1-2. 1-3. 1-4. 3.1-1. 3.1-2. 3.2-1. 3.2-2. 3.2-3. 3.2-4. 3.3-1. Table 1-1. 2-1. 3.2-1. 3.2-2. 3.2-3. 3.2-4. LIST OF FIGURES Regional Setting ot the Project Site Local Setting ot the Project Site .... ........... ............. ......... ............ .......... Proposed Project Site Plan ...................................... Proposed Project Building Elevations ............................ Project Area General Plan Land Use Designations ................. Project Area Zoning ............................................. Average Daily Trat'tic Vol\IDes ......... .... ............... ....... Trip Distribution ............................................... A.M. Peak Hour Project Related Trat'tic . .......... ...... ......... P.M. Peak Hour Project Related Trat'tic .... ............ .......... .laa 1-2 1-3 1-5 1-6 3-2 3-3 3-6 3-11 3-12 3-13 Views ot the Project Site and Adjacent Development .............~ 3-20 LIST OF TABLES Proposed Project Site Coverage .................................. S\lDlDary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures .......... ........ .... Intersection Level of Service Descriptions . ........ ...... ....... Proposed Project Trip Generation .... ........... ... ....... ....... A.M. Peak Hour Levels ot Service . ............................... P.M. Peak Hour Levels ot Service .. ... ........ ......... ....... ... ii .laa 1-1 2-2 3-9 3-10 3-13 3-14 PREFACE !'his Envi~ollDental Impact Repo~t (EIR) has been p~epa~ed in conformance with the Califo~nia Env1~ol'lllental Quality Act of 1970 (CEQA) as amended through 1983 and the Guidelines for Envi~o1'lllental Impact Reports. It has also been p~epa~ed in conformance wi th the Ci ty of Campbell's adopted p~ocedures fo~ the prepa~ation, processing and review of envirol'lllental documents. The purpose of an EIR is to provide objective information to public decisiollllakers and the general public regarding potential envi~ol'lllental effects resul ting f~CID project implementation. The City of Campbell can then insti tute methods of reducing adverse impacts or consider al terna ti ves to the proj ect. As stated in CEQA, the purpose of an EIR is to identify only the significant effects of a project on the envi~o1'lllent, where significant effects are defined as "substantial adverse impact (s) on the envirol'lllent". This EIR, therefore, discusses in detail primarily those impacts determined to have a potentially significant or substantial adverse effect. The Initial Study prepared by the Ci ty of Campbell Planning Department identified areas in which the project could have significant effects on the envirollllent: land use and planning, circulation and pa~k1ng, visual and glare, and storm d~a1nage/water quality. Areas not cove~ed in this EIR due to the c1 ty' s determination of insignificance or analysis conducted during the p~epa~ation of this EIR include noise, biology, geology/soil caapaction, a1~ quality, energy, publiC services and utilities, jobslbousing and hyd~ology/flood ~isk. Also included in the CEQA Guidelines is the p~ovision that -the discussion of mitigation measures shall distinguish between the measures that a~e p~oposed by p~oject proponents to be included in the project, and other measures which are not included, but could be reasonably expected to reduce adve~se impacts. Accordingly, all mitigation measures ~ecommended within this EIR are not p~esentlY' included in the project unless otherwise specifically noted. Where app~op~iate, this EIR inco~po~ates by refe~ence documents that are readily available to the gene~al public, in accordance with the amended Guidelines. iii 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1.1 PROJECT SITE LOCATION AND CHARACTERISTICS The proposed project site is located in the City of Campbell in Santa Clara County. The site consists of 3.42 acres and is bounded by multi-family town- house residences and the Santa Clara Valley Water District's Page Groundwater Recharge Facility to the north; single family residences and Walnut Drive to the west; single family residences to the south; and Winchester Boulevard and an office/industrial park development to the east. Figure 1-1 presents the regional setting and Figure 1-2 shows the local setting. The project site is currently undeveloped, and contains mature domestic trees and dry grasses. A portion of the si te contains disturbed soil from the neigh- boring recharge faCility and an unvegetated gravel area is located along part of the Winchester Boulevard frontage. The topography of the site is generally level. 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND OBJECTIVES The project applicant, March Development Company, proposes to construct a two story office and research and development building with 63,104 gross square feet of noor area, a building footprint of 31,552 square feet, and a floor/ area ratio of 0.42. The ratio of office space to research and developaent space is unknown of this time but the applicant has stated the majority of space would probably be devoted to research and development. It is estimated there would be approximately 189 employees at fully occupancy of the project, asslllling an average employee density of three employees per 1,000 gross square feet of floor area (ITE, 1979). A parking lot with 252 parking spaces (67 compact spaces and 185 standard spaces, including five handicapped spaces) would accOllpany the building. The total number of spaces meets the city's requirEllent of one space per 250 square feet of research and developaent floor area. Two entry/exit driveways along the east side of the proposed building would prOVide access from the parking area to Winchester Boulevard. Site coverage of the project is shown in Table 1-1. Figure 1-3 presents the proposed project site plan and Figure 1-4 shows the building elevations. TABLE 1-1. PROPOSED PROJECT SITE COVERAGE COVER TYPE SQUARE FEET PERCEN TAG E Building 31 ,552 21 Parking and Roadways 89,976 60 Landscaping and Open Space 27, 6 36 19 Total 149,164 (3.42 acres) 100.0 Source : Dennis Kobza & Associates, IDc. 1-1 _ _U'QI'_~"'____ SONOMA ,,_tt_ eo,. HlII 511"........ ....!. .,....,"- .Aftplft .. ~ , I t NAP A .r-\./r--.-......---.-) I . . , \ .0._ i \ . . I , . . .v_,... I .- ~._~ ; ~ SOLANO L j "..tt_ 7 . ~C~ I I I ,- ........ . .S-1Iou e;..._u SAN FRANCISCO SANTA CLARA SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION. COUNTIES AND LOCALITIES . ''---'' - -- - -- - ----_.._c- ~_-4 __ .. ..... .. ..... ......~ "\ "1 .Giltoy 'I "\ 1'''',------ '\/ .--- I DRAWN BY DATE REGIONAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE CHECKED BY I JOB Nl.ME FIGURE NO. I ~G;:)~ [7 \J [j=' [5:i WILSON & PORTER ENGINEERING t> 1-1 70 ZOE · SUITE 200 · SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94107 SCALE 1"-15 miles 1-2 :-i"'-~~4.. / .. .'" ,_, t ILle" '0_ · I" -" /1 l ;1~.,,1I --.. I /~ 'I' ,I ~/ · ~- r-- - a 5 I · J L I - II - :I... , -It '---"- ~.F ~ 1 nr' ... I I 1 i' ......... . , ' Ga:, :. · 7~~,. .~~Jl ~~~~l~"::~ ~~;: I_I.,:':: - ~.~ j: - ~tO",'f~.d! ~ ~ ,~~.'C .::. I CI1l;l.iil:.!-i ..,_ _,,\~ _I, .-wi< __.- -~I:~:EII'::&: I ~...,~:~' c ..~~')/ . .~. -- ,. . ~-" it-.......-U- ~ ~I.. = _.!!'. - ,- ..: ._1' Ii .: .1"1 ~ .ii iI'r ~ j~\ I ~ '~ ",'" "~"r ,11>,. ~ -"'" ,- AWlL ..: . t,i _._ '_, . -I. ~_.. I ,B'!::!. ~... '_ L- - - __- ~ ...... III I , I It.. ') ,~{...JL1. ~ .' 51 1111 I: ~ .,; _ ~ ,L5' III";' - . i ,Ii ~II . h._ Ii '"'/1 /,' - II; It. ~x ~", (",' 1\11: ii I · -, -.. -..a ~. oi.. ~CiIlil 1/ 0, II tl J~ " ~~~!, ~ !\. .I;a.. 'A'~ro . - -;, I ~. ~I~.I T' I : II II III /.. ,':"~! _" ~ ~ ,~/~~, j,~I~II....~I:I~;II~llls II:!:'! ..= .. !~:.' f.r - 11_ ~~ ~~ {,.>> 1'(- fil~(\:fi&. ~ ptJ-.BI'~1I .itl!!~ ;18= ~ t. L r ~-: llm ~.~ ~'7.J}Ji~ /J1:-- ~II= - -. c So~.! I K AV'! - , /. - CO.". .1 ')II- I~ _ ~ I '.'':;' ,,, - I~I, p >. ~(......fr':?.. ,. '''!;., 5 - · · · I ~I 1ft. 1i~1i~ ~'~v ~ -.... · .- "'Jffi ,- ~.. " .)1" I . h- I~. '11,-, -:;.. .. ~:. II'-~ i!~ ~ lit I r!,ff; If .~. ~.. ill..; 17_:}\- Ii. "- :_1 · _! ~ :";,/~t<~' i" - ..::. -... ('" <> IF'I, - e ':~i." iI\m.atIR I I.II!..IO.I ,t . \~ -- Ii ~/~ R.4JI - .... r. . -7' .. I ~ I, i~'...~... s ~ sl!e " .. ' .1....... 1-";;. "IV .-.-- iil.... _ .' , i ~ ~I ~I- .. I -'Ii I! ..1. 'II . I. _ . i..- - 'f#' Z [JOiT1 , Il!!!lEL...._~1c I IU,- 11;: _...1 ~~\~1~~ -IMfjDJ- I '- ,.t~Q,ro.~"",~ .-so' - 'lN2P ~I ~ i' /-:.; t: "'l!I!...B I - ._.~hl<" .iJ ~ ~<' \ ; !;;~~j!~iij;~~';:~'J~~\~f~";:{. :{{,,'P.-0~,~f~ \~ -Ilof' · _~ ;; -=l~~ t 'lir.'i ID,~ .., -1 L_ ~~ ~ (::j,!' ~!~- ~ II ~~; ~) fc i ::! ~~.. ,r~~ t :,,!:...,i;, I: 'If 'h - [ ..- i."l (1 ;1) !~~I 'lIS j~m;} -...~ ~ \1 \~ ~~ 'i, ~I If _11M h cr t I ~ ;- r: ~~ ~~~'--rj ~ ~ y ~ "-9" ~~ . n.w ~/" I - II '!{\! Ii.,.. -. '. I r Ii t ~ -.;. \~..: u;l OIl -~ '~,\\!\~!.i rt- if,..." - -: 1.';_-;. : I II Y//~.i i I',' r..t.!. -- -Iff - A- ~ ~~ -,js\iiioo" .. I ..- --:J _ . ~~t--- ..//1,.1 it" ~:~l' /lil I ~ l;~~,,~~~,. "' --:~ ~l\\ ~:-:1 ~ 'iIll-!mdjlt~~-:~~--1iiJ1 n I!I : ,~,!! I, 11m / /~\ \5\~;; .f! ::" ~~~ ~_-,. . c. - - ....1':'..-1 I'. /!~... 1#1 iii / ~ =! ~___l' ~PROJECTSITE~/iT~o"81f:" .-~., --r 7':! ~~ 1,~1, ~IIIC ~~ir:' ~~~~-<':il~ -. ~lJc." : ~ Ii-- -,;;" ~ I -..- I.. . I!, , :~~ - i\- ~_ ~ !\Q:I - __ _IMft "rrI ,t); It' ) ') i, , ~ :J'i cI oC - ~ - i. ~-;i7r': · i It II ~T~~~ {i ;'~I~~~';; ,; ~ I.LYJZ~ ~ I,,,,, '~--- II 11/~j~ ~ ...:..... .. sl I , 1____ · ~IJ." ~~~. 7/ 1/ ,. ! ...... "'L." r .... illl .'!, I ~. ~ ~I ."'''0I1~/~!!li;r~ 'L-;e.' ,~, L.._. ~~... .~ JlJiII ! ~ '~t;IM'I~ ~;: lJ/} bC(.~ '* ~y~ -..:;:,,- -~/i5~~fi7,~;;Jl:_~ ItiJls..!,:~ I .~~a."'I- .-""~:/ ~ 0 '~I ~ ~~""" ~ 'I K ;;'~/~ . ~."l_J "r;-.J.~ ..., .......~~, -" · # ~,~ .. i, ~I ..~I ~~ ...... --;.-..," - I. ,/ ,- . .r Ip/ i .,J. · "-' 1.:-'. ~U- - ~ .. r J) fiTtf', ~4 ~/~.<M '1:".. \~\ !t> '-''I ~.. /W~r I __~..,. _ ... ~ III ~ [,IJ ~ ,'V w _. \ii( J 'Ie _... I ~C) 7 ~~ li'I~-:...sIt.. i .. ~.__I _ [- - L}~ II /'. ,~~~;/7'iT,. --- .. 'Ie i ( f!\ - \ \ ~ I ~ ;of ~ ~. " "Q81Jt. *1 :; il ~ _ J i .:. 1l --; .. ~jc I ..m \,~: ,~~__;u__, .. I , - 11."iU\'\ I""" ...,ur' z ~ - \ \1 ~" ~ ),. ~~" ~ I : V' ~.;.:t _ 5L1~!, I t , ... ,~ J \ I '- \ ~~ . " '- ~( , ... ~'-_'" ~ -T' "a ,\( i I~ ~ ---.l Ii, ~!J "o,~ ..\~ I l,/.;'\~'--'''''' "'!~ ' -~ ~ ~ /~--. r ~ ~~~ L~ ' ~ I~ I ~'i.li.. ...1= II r ..--f- ..I 1/1;. .-~]J I II 1;(~.AJr~~~~~ '-:lll~- ~(-- 51~ ;1;~~H-i~~;IJ~~,_,,: ~'~ 'i.,~i'~!"'7.~I.L/"~'.~'J~i&~'~ 1 .." ~l.:!Ji~'illl .i~ii I\i,~~ < .f-.,.~ J.Z;_--d1~~' ~~~ iZ;~.~S~" ~':'-:Pf 7'--"0>,-~' . ~ ,",.o-<;if I :~.. 's-'.- 'tf.Ii ~. 9t - - i!:.-.s Ii _..... .;..r.-l- I' J Ilc! ~I' Ii-- · ~;' f,.. '0/1 ' / ~ i~\t I; $ ,. f ~. _ JG'i:$-~ ~_~:=- ~lID' III ;~5~I ~ 14: J ,/l4o~ ~1!11.~'\",;_'1 I,. ,.\\~~\,......" _~~" '-" DRAWN BY DATE LOCAL SETTING OF THE PROJECT SITE CHECKED BY JOB NloME FIGURE NO. ~~~ [7 D[j=7~ WILSON & PORTER ENGINEERING t> 70 ZOE · SUITE 200 · SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94107 1-2 SCALE 1" = 2500' 1-3 1 '3 nTTRNDED USE OF mE EIR This EIB will be used tor envirolllental review or the request tor a zoning amendment, site develolllllent, and building permit apprcwal tor the proposed projeot. The City or Campbell will be using tbis EIB in its decision making process. The General Plan land use de s1 gna tion 8IIIendment tor the projeot s1 te bas already received preliminary approval; tinal apprcwal will ooour upon approval ot the projeot s1 te plan. 1-11 '0 I > '..J I 'm \. \ \ \ EXISTING WOOD FENCE \ \ TO BE REMOVED \ INSTALL NEW 6'-0" HIGH MASONRY WALL \' \ ,\ \\\\ \ r1t ii < ~ a:: < o . ~ I. ll< Ii < ~'/'---- ..--- ..---- " ~ --- ':'- -' E,\..\.. - ~ ~E,~~~ .~ ._____i \ ~ \ \ , \ \ I - ,..,- EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN PASSIVE EMPLOYEE PICNIC AREA ~ --.....- - CHAPMAN DR. l - --...... .-.- " f DRAWN BY DATE PROPOSED PROJECT SITE PLAN CHECKED BY JOB NAME FIGURE NO. ~~u;; [7 \J[?~ WILSON & PORTER ENGINEERING [> 70 ZOE · SUITE 200 · SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94107 1-3 SCALE 1-5 I ! .i j I a::! :1 ?I ~' 0 ", . CO ~. Z N' _. .....; +j +i r..., . I ,C - - "- ~ ~, I~' ,IT .... 11_ - - - - -- ~-'>- -- ! j.......':., , , I ~, j ~i L' ~., ~' _~c : ~,' ~ ~ - - ~ --: - - - -::- --=- I , , ;... - r .. .. -.. i I-- I II i I ~ , ~ ~ -- ........:. .- .. , -- ! - i ..:.. : r-' ~ I Ii -, , i ~ - , l_ - ~ ..........,. i-- J ~r-' ~ T II ' I , ; , i ! ,--:- ~ t.:l Z H 5l 0 ~ ~ E-- ~ a:: u z 0 u I , , I I .1 ~' bl '0 ~; ~I .. I . ..;t ! ~I NI _I +: + ~ : I z ~~"'- :'c-=-t:~-=-::" , z 0 0 ~ I , I j:: < < > ~ i- > III ... III III r-. I- I ... III ~I ...... t~ I- ::)' CD 0' III CDI - ~'-.-.~~~~ ~ "'" , I I I ~ ~ lr- i - t-- - , ..:... : ~ ...,;. - ~ _ ....'; J! ~ ,:":':"'; ~ !:iihi~ ,~ ~ i-::- '-=- , , I r-. i r-. b_ - - - - - - '......, I '_ I '- I-- 1-:- Ii-- I. - 1- ,- ~ ~ - I I~ I I~ ; I-I i~ 1 ,. I'~ ...,.. I _:..:: I !..:. I~ --:-1 ---'I i-::-,: -'-~ """7 :::1 1-, :::i I I-- I-- f-- f-- =/ I i I j , 0 : I .. ~I CO N -, + +, I . ,..,....,.. . a:: ~' , , z; ..... r...' z o ~ < i ~ , ... III %: I- : a::, , il --:- I-- -:- f-'- :-: I,..:.. , l- T ,I-,-;- -7 I I~ .:;... , '- ~ I ..:- ~ : ..,...;. I ..;.;.. I i ...:..;. f ;.1 r-,-":' ~ ' ' . I I- I ~ I ...;.:.". ""7- i Ii , ....... i I ; ~ .;.:.;. -- -=-:- .:..,.... I ,\ ~ i I~ , I Ii ..;... I :.,.;;;.. ,.. I~ I I ~ I I I S : Ii-- 1 I ! r ~ "l~ I I :.;. -'- I f-- ! ~ I i~ J ! i ~ i I~ I ! i if-- I - I ~ ' . J !-::- ~ :...:... : ....... i~ i I ',' I I. _..~ ..- --- .- -_. r ,~;' !~ If- Er "':1~- .. ~ - ,. '.. I I , ! z tf.l W ~ x: w w ~ ~ f..; U tf.l tf.l ..... :>< t ~ tf.l f..; W Z x: 0 j:l.. ~ ..... r... g w c:::: w 0 r... Eo-< 0 tf.l 0 ~ ~ I--:=: ~ ;:; ..... ",~ , .t:. ~: g' ~ ~I ~, 9, fz,.. E-4i r... I r... r...: ~ ~~; o~' 0 f..;' , w 01 ~~' j:l.. , Z u .......... o ' .....~, ...:I ~ Eo-< ~-~.i.-.., ~;-~'I -T .....ll'f... ! !~ ~:~-;-~~; .,..J 'I ~'" .. ~.... ~ ...... I I ~: ,= i !~ 0; . ~ 17-' I~ I -. - ; I f-7: S -- :::: - :...;,:. : ~' ~.l h:' ~ 7' 1-:- , , .,..;.. 7 ....;;..; , I ~ + i I ,..;... .,.;:.:,. ! .. : i P' I f s ! ~ , + I ~ ~ :...:;., ':';"'1 ;.;;..1 ! I r i i -,I!~: i ,:11 i~ j : i-I' ~ :.... f:-:-:-II-- '-'-::- I C' I I'~ I ~I ! ,,,,,,":- ::...:- i ,-- I ,.:- I , 1~!::7 I I i II--II!......;. -Ii ;Z , i, i :_' '..,.- I ,__! I~ '-1-::- ,-: ~ I , , :~ h-- I 1= ~!, L: 1=,1 =1 ti-'- :..:.:.:.. i'- ;71, 1-' '"""="'"1 I~ :..:.:.:. _I I~ ,,-~ I=I! 1=/ - j...... , I, I - ..'-..r...~~ .:::r- I L1J-t a:: ::> (!)' _0 l4.Z CI) z: o - I- <( > UJ -J UJ C) z: - Q -J - ::J c:Q I- U UJ J o c:: Q.. Q UJ CI) o Q.. o c:: 0.. (!J ~ :2: .. - en a: c Lu u Lu 0 ~ u - CI) (!J Q ~ Z c Lu a:: ~ ex: Z ~ C CI) ex: . 0 ~ Q. &AI 00 ~ :2: 5 en 0 . CI) &AI -' 0 ~ N ~ ~~ @~ ~~ 2. SUMMARY The proposed project is the construction of a two story office and research and development building vith adjacent surface parking. The project is locaeed on a 3.42 acre site at 3101 Winchester Boulevard in Campbell. When this report was completed the proposed project consisted of a 63,104 square foot building which would accommodate approximately 189 employees at full occupancy. The project has since been downsized approximately 1700 square feet to 61,424 square feet. Impacts identified in this report should be reduced an equivalent amount. 2.1 POTDTIAI. D4PACT's AND PROPO,Slm MITmATION M1U...~tJRFS Table 2-1 sl.IIJIarues potential impacts and lIitigation lIeasures (not included in current plans) which would lIin1l1ue lIost at the potential impacts to a level of insignificance. 2.2 ALTRRtHTIVES EV'ALtJATED '%'he no project alternative and a lIixed use (cOllUllercial and residential) alternative are evaluated in this EIR. The no project alternative assllles that develolJlent as proposed would not occur on the project site at the present tille. Given that the site is lIostly privately awned and has been planned for COIIIlerc1al and residential uses, it is probable that another proposal tor developaent at the site would be subaitted in the future if the proposed project were not undertaken. The II1Dd use al terna ti ve assllles office deve10lJlent of the si te' s CClllllerd.ally zoned 1.67 acres partially fronting on Winchester Boulnard and law denai ty residential developaent at the re.aining residentially zoaed 1.75 acres. The comaerd.al portion of the project site could support an office develol8ent of approz:1utelr 30,000 square feet. Such a develolllent would geaerate an average ot 369 trip ends per day. Added to this would be an estimated seven low density residential UD1 ts which would geaerate an averap of 70 trip ends per day for a total or -39 trip eDds per day. This alternative would ..nerate 57 percent of the trattic generated' by tile proposed project. The residential traffic would probably enter and ent tile project site by Wling Walnut Drive, which would increase traffic on that uno!" local street. Under the proposed project, no access would be uailable traI Walnut Drive. The jobs/houaing iJIIpact of the II1Dd use alternative would be be t ter than the proposed proj ect; hawner, this al terna t1 ve voul d resul t in increased sani tar)' sever deIIands and other public se"ices needs. 2. ~ IDDTIF'nD ARP!.A...~ OF CQr(TRO'1P!RSY The Ci ty of Campbell PlaDDing Department haa identified land use, hOWling, traffic, par 1c1 ng, visual, and storm drainage/water quality, soil CCIIp&ction, ligb t, glare, noise and flooding as areas of contrwersy and potentially significant envirolllental 1JIlpacts to be addressed in this EIR (see Apppend1x A). Publio conoern in response to the iDtol'llation prOYided in this Draft III w11l be addressed in the Final IIR. 2-1 TABLE 2-1. SUMMARY OF POTD'l'IAL IMPACTS AND PROPOSED MITEATION MEASURES SECTION/IMPACT MITEA'l'IOR MEASURE ~ ~ 1 L.ARD 1l SE DID PI.. DlHnta The project would create new employment and r8love the poten- tial for residential develop- lIent or the residentially plaDDed and zoned portion of the parcel. ~.2 CIlICOLA'l'IOR AND PARrDm !he proj ect woul d increase the potent1al for vehicle turning con- f11cts on Winchester Boul.,ard at the project s1 te entrance. The project would generate an average of 776 one way tr1ps per day, contribut1ng ~ulatively to an 1ncrease in a1.r pollutants generated and tratt'ic .,oluaes on local and regional roadways. ~- ~ VISUAL OUAL!TY L1gbting t'rca the project park1ng structure could att'ect adj acent residents. The project would create partial .,1evs ot cOllllerc1al d..,elolllent adj acent to residential uses. ~_Ja smRM DRADlJaRNA'l'RR OUALI'I"f The proj ect wUl 1ncrease stell'll wa ter runot't' in the vicini ty. The City of Campbell may wish to consider redesignating additional land for high density residential uses to compensate for the loss of future residential uses on the project site and increased housing demand. Iaprove the west side or Winchester Boul.,ard in t'ront at the project at te to tull standards including provision or a tv~w., let't turn lane. Provide preferential parking or other incenti.,es to encourage car and vaD- pooling. Prcaote the use at staggered work hours or t'lez tae to the desree poSsible. Warta tone ligbts on low pror~e dark standarcla should be aona1dered tor the park1ng area ligbt1q. S1 te landscap111S mould be designed to lI1n:1m1ze ...i.,s or the project trca adjacent res1dences. '!'he appl1cant mall arrange tor COD- 118ction to adequate stOl"ll drain 11118s tor the project. Pinal drainage plana abould be apprwed by the ci ty Public Works Depart.ent. '!'he landscaped areas or the project s1 te mould be designed to absorb rUD- oft t'raa roots, walkways and parking areaa. (COR'l'IlIlJBD ) 2-2 TABLE 2-1 (CONTIRUED). SUMMARY OF POTERTIAL IMPACTS AND PROPOSED MITm AT ION MEASURES SECTION/IMPACT MITmATIOR MEASURE Project developaent may bring about the handling and storage ot hazardous materials on site with subsequent increase in the potential tor contuina tion ot ground water resources. Any use or storage ot hazardous aaterials on the site shall be subject to the regulations ot the Ci ty ot Campbell Hazardous Materials Ordinance 10. 1-53, and those or local, state, tederal regulatory agencies. Such regulations include adequate container- ization ot hazardous materials. ~ "-.J 2-3 ~- RNVIRCJlMENTAL SETTING, SmNIFICANT RNVIRCJlMENTAT. EFFECTS, AHD MITmATION MEASURES PROPOSED TO MINIMIZE mE smNIFICANT EFFECTS ~_1 LARD USE ARD PLANNING EYT~ TING SETTING '.Slnd URA. The project site is currently vacant and undeveloped. Surrounding land uses include commercial, single family residential, multi-family residential, and percolation ponds. Office and manufacturing developnent, including Zilog Corporation facilities are located opposite the site on Winchester Boulevard; low density single family residences exist to the west and south along Walnut and Chapman Drives; Hacienda Village, a mul ti-family townhouse developnent, is located north or the site along Hacienda Avenue; and the Page Groundwater Recharge Facility operated by the Santa Clara Valley Water District is located to the northeast or the site, extending north past Hacienda Avenue. The Southern Pacific Transportation COIIlpany railroad tracks are located across Winchester Boulevard fraa the site and lie parallel to Winchester Boulevard. CSlmphAll GAnAral Pl an and 1.on1 nl. The project site is currently designated for commercial and low density residential uses (approximately four un! ts per gross acre) according to the Land Use Element of the Ci ty of Campbell's General Plan. Adjacent and surrounding land uses are also designated for commercial and low and mediUlll density residential uses (see Figure 3.1-1). Existing adjacent land uses are generally consistent with the General Plan designations, al though single family residences exist to the south or the project site in an area designated and zoned for commercial use. The proposed project is in a General Commercial (C-2-S) and a Residential (R-1-10) zoning district, consistent with the General Plan land use designations. The adjacent and surrounding properties are also in COIIUIIercial and residential zoning districts (see Figure 3.1-2). IMPACT~. The proposed project would al ter the project site's existing land use by replacing vacant land with a two story, 63,104 Bquare foot office building and a ground level parking structure. The proposed project would be compatible with surrounding commercial uses on Winchester Boulevard. The project would represent a different use traa neighboring residential development to the north, west and south. However, the parking area or the project would be adjacent to existing neighboring residential property, and is, in general, considered to be a cOlllpatible transitional use between commercial and residential land uses (Stafford, 1984). The si te would be separated frOlll adjacent residences by a six foot masonry wall, and parking lot lighting would prOVide additional security. The proposed masonry wall will be inset at a portion ot the site's western boundary, al though a straight property line will be maintained (see Figure 1-3). A property easement will be granted to the adjacent residence tor the section of land between the inset and the site's property line to accommodate an existing leachfield. A zoning amendment and tinal approval ot the tentative General Plan amendment would be necessary to accommodate commercial building in the existing R-1-10 district. Use of the s1 te for commercial developnent rather than low dens! ty residences would eliminate potential housing opportunities for this s1 te and the research and development project would increase housing demand. The 3-1 ~:.::l::;:~::zj lei;.... ~ iiiiii;::::::::j;;~~g~ g g UO 10 g -~:~ gcg~ggog g go~ Crr: "lie,. · ...... .: .~:I ::.....::::::::....... 00 coo" 0 0 o9oooogo 0 o~ 0" ,. it ::::"::'f'~ 0 1 . ..:: ..:::::::::::..:::::::: 0.., ~ 0 0 0 ego ~ .1Ji1~oo 0 o~o go.... .~. ::r:f!fW.o 0 ~ ~l,;.: .~: imim~i:::nnmif: ~':- II';} 0 0 .~~ ~ 9':1 v,c~oo 0 0;:;0 0 ~_ ~n~ !~:c:c:;:;:::';!t ~imi~mJU~ffgmf~~ .(jA:1J:'jl~: Jtfi'~J; ~~~nA ,;ff.{~~:1!2;) fl !:-" .:::~a:;:!:::J""" ~r.:';;'::::':';':::::::::::'oo 'A.) ':'1/;/!(t''O.~:!t~, t~:~~ ~~~~~r.\i-.; )1 'iiiHUiW;.:: ;> ~1if:p.Ji! ffi!!iC. :.: 8!-:::::=:: .!.:.:;:~~ ~:ig,~(.~ ~~., ~:4~~~Wll' ~.?? ~. ::'S' :':"'161,; ~/;" .....:t. .. · · · · · · · · .. ,1" r.! .IJl.'Ii... ~....'. ~'. Ie. :~ oo~~ " ~:.. ~:~ :::::: ,.. ............ :.......~. 'j} I;~ ...?~'~..';'J~:i':..::~:~:. : . ..::: oOJQ~ ,........ ::...: .... .;........;ti .~........ .. -a ~. ,j~'r-.."':'...::' .e:::::..~o, :.~... ..... ..:::::' ., . .. ... ". . . . . .~ . .. .~ ,;j~:.'."ll ...., '6'O'L'J,:;JOCOOl .:~".......: ......... · . . ... '-. .... . ...... ..'. ....~I. ~. g guvboc .~:.:..... :::::.. .. ..... . ". .. . . ~':, ...~":.- 41(. ~OA~oooooouo .OOOO~60'Oboci6:..... ...... ...;~.~...:.:~~.~ .....:. ~t.~~~ '.~.~....~: 000 oooooooc OOol . .:4 ... .....~...... :... .....;~. 'r~II" ~ ~ .r. AYE ~ ~~ ..!...... ..:;~ .......:=~.~l .....;t.~~lJ ~cf~ooooooooooo .oooooo~ooooooo..ooooo H.l.C'!~.D~J · ,~.~.~..&'y~:.': II ....7.l...." ~<r.... ooooo-o~lIlf/ll/ 00 "v,po - llJ ......: :. ~ .~ ....:... ."0.':'-:.:-_' '" OOIJ 7oor.o 0011I0') .. ''"- ~'..:::.:.:.- ~,:~.:..:.!..~;..-~,,:..!.:i..J OO~Cb-o~"o<ooo~oo_~, "'0 ~vy I ... ~... a.:..:....._---...... ... ".".-.. ~~ '-'I~O~..~ r_' oooo~o. '-~1~ ..:: '1IJ.'~ , '.~r... .... ..~...:.: ~~'-~ ~tOj 001 00 ~ ~cccoPoo ~.~\.\ ::::........ .... J ~~ ..~...... 01, - ~OO O~ P.-y~O'O:O .~.......~~~ ~#~:: .:}.F~t.Wi\:i:::;.~..::~::. ':':f'J:;:r-:::"~:1' ~.. / .t ':~ """ I"7:~.~~Onoo('o;;C1~ ~~.~., ....y.... ..,........ .;. '0 ....... ...."., '/ J'<rb 1':'7a;;;..:;... ~~.. ...... ........ .... .~~,..... .' t!"J~ k",,-- Wrf~ ~ ~~'{f::r /:':'~ ,.::.::~:~,.~.~:.: ,'''0'';'''';0 '. '.. ''I:~ ,>, .~ ..~.. ee:.IIt!m.t.. . . .' ... .. 'J . !. " '" '""""'" '/.:'. :~w::;;.. ;. ....: ::.;'. fl~;' I" J~ ':;: ~~;'~::::"'}.::;;WI~-r:f&J~}l=:(~ '., '~""i.~ ',~ "', d;' '" ;,"" ~. I::.;~....;j....: .":": ;'...; .. ':l'Jr.':-:~ ::;>.-,,,.,_ :. (:,:,1._'.. . .:. t..::: . .'~..:1..:'.. ,', ~:x;:.. - ~ . ~.~. .~- .... ",' -. ~.. .-. 0 Dr' ., . ':1 r;~t~rt~"f',~:,=:::= :'::::1.;-:: J..; L"") 'j~--}/ I '~, ~ ....-.' '-"..~ ...... .. .1.:....., /&" "'~"r.?,~ ~ ~ r.~~,~~ . :-.. -:::r-;,: ~\~./~, ~ ., i~~~.~~.:-:.~:. ::::/~~~. . AC""::;l-- 'C:: . '... . . .~S{".';;'~l.~ ~ ..:~.~...:;,o ~... ~~~ .' ". .....l.... .,.,,~ " '~~~~.~~~.::~.;' :.:7~..~::.::~ :, ,~, '",., - .i\S-.r~-J,"'" ..' "S: .' ~~~~~~i'I.~;.~'/' ~:~~.~~{. J :, '.':~ << - ...' ."\~ . '" . :..~::.: ~ . .. "., ~ ;:-...: ....,~:'~ ,..',... \ ".....' ~~~ ::.~"2. .:.!J.:.:.:...., ~C, ~" · ','~~~ .-.f; .~:...t:i=.:~~ ,''f"':- ~~~d...: ...."".....; "~ ..._ .e. ....::~~. ..( ~ , 7-1- jf j ~o:o~~~ ~ 1 1 ~oooo~~. Tni J \ h ~~opoooo IY j · f--j -.ocoOJ A.l .]{ ~ ,~ ,~ t I ~ $ . !If,. ~ t1' A , . :~ .. ., ''"'- ~l PROJ ECT SITE.~ .' 0"; I. I" :l ~J t+/ r/ ~~ "" '" '" <.:~. ~ :-. ~ ~~~o_ _. KEY . .... (6."- .,(.';~ ~~-':~. .'~ o. o LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL : (LESS THAN 3.5 DUs/ACRE) . . ~~~LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL . . (LESS THAN 4.5 DUs/ACRE) . rrr;:I LOW DENSiTY RESIDENTIAL . ~ (LESS THAN 6 DUs/ACRE) rogi1 LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY ~ RESIDENTIAL ... rei MEDIUM DENSITY L...&.J RESIDENTIAL ~;:;, HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. [Illl] COMMERCIAL ;'.ilj" r;-;:n PUBLIC, SEMI-PUBLIC ...,~~ ~ ~ m INDUSTRIAL .r::::. - CAMPBELL CITY LIMIT ......;..:.;::::::..,....... ..,. _........ ..... ,~. _"1...'. , u- ~ / t4L .,. 1f4: ~ .. ~ ... .; ". , /. l... DRAWN BY DATE PROJECT AREA GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS CHECKED BY JOB Nt. ME FIGURE NO. ~ [o:J U;; [7 \J~[5 WILSON & PORTER ENGINEERING t> 3.1-1 70 ZOE . SUITE 200 · SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94107 SCALE I" - 500' <-? '.111 r r . 1 I _. ? ~-- -.,..---.. . I . 1..,.,_': '.'-- . . . .. . ----.~' . . , . I - . : I ~' · CL. . z'. :. , j,i...., : --.-;:;.t......i....~~ 1.: " '.. , ..- ~ R, I r ,I' 1 .. -I .'... ;.&. r, . ,.if) . P -~.~ .u::-.L..: at ~ . If:) -'" "O..r ;1, _ ---.. . . . A-:', \ ~; ~ : I 2'V.) : Q- · ~.,,-,... . - . . . R · ....... .....(-.,.-... ....f~.,.,....... L · I: -.. .U' ~"'l1. ': . ..... ..1 ..~.. ........ . I. ;\ 1:':( ~.;~..: I 1 ~..~ '-- C'" · 1 --- - .. " .. . ~ . ~", ........:....."ACI1MDA".-;-;.........AV I ' . c-,. . .... ..... ... e. . ~ ...... ....... .......: · " ~~ ' .. :.. .- (, '\ : jj. -;;;;;;; aM .' - -~~ : ~~~r- . . . ..... .,. ~.. . --' .' .u '1 : :iCJ. . '. · , r I' VI'.... i-. : · . .. r=-- "C'i""" -j. .. · . . . - ~ A_ .p '- .... · . c....... , . · 1 ~ ; -4 P- F I . -.. . -. . . . -. . ., . .. . . R -I '" '" -I-S~ CAPRI SCHOOL (K-6) --- --. . P-Q-S PROFESSIONAL OFFICES I P-D PLANNED DEVELOPMENT CM:B CONTROLLED MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIAL P-F PUBLIC FACILITIES CAMPBELL CITY LIMIT DRAWN BY DATE PROJECT AREA ZONING CHECKED BY JOB Nt-ME FIGURE NO. ~ G;:)U;; [7 \J r:::f=7 Q:5 WILSON & PORTER ENGINEERING [> 3.1-2 70 ZOE . SUITE 200 · SAN FRANCISCO. CA '4107 SCALE 1" - 500' 3-3 eXisting land use and zon1ng des1gna t10ns would all~ the develoPlent of approximately seven dWelling units on the project site. The increase in bousing demand would occur due to the creation of an est1l1ated 189 researcb and develo~ent jobs, based on an average generation rate of three employees per 1,000 square feet of gross t'loor space (ITE, 1979). Since tbe actual types ot' businesses wbich would occupy this develo~ent are unknown, actual employment generation may dit't'er t'raa this estimate. The increase in bousing demand tbat the DeW _ployees would generate would depend on the type ot' workers employed and their place ot' residence at the time of employment. The most likely source of DeW housing demand would be t'raa more highly s1d.lled, higher income protessional, technical, and managerial occupations that more typically are tilled by heads of bouseholds. These are the posi tions tor which companies would be most likely to relocate experienced personnel t'raa outside the San Francisco Bay Area or traa more distant ci ties in the region. The salary level ot these po 211 tions also would be high enough to warrant the relocation ot bouseholds. Addi tionally, considering the high cost ot bousing in tbe San Francisco Bay Area, generally, and in Santa Clara County, specitically, persons with these salary levels are the IIOSt capable of acquiring new residences. It is ditt1cult to predict the level ot housing demand generated which would be traa these higher paying posi tiona because DO specitic research and develoPlent tenants bave been identitied. This project lIay also provide second incOlles to local tamilies where lIore than one bousehold lI_ber chooses to work outside the home. The lower skill reqUirements ot sCllle clerical positions lIay create job opportun1ties tor the unemployed and under_ployed residents at the area. It is unlikely that individuals would travel long distances to these lower skilled jobs, nor would the jobs be likely to be perceived as suft'iciently unique posi tiona to justify man,y households relocating to the vicinity to take advantage of these lower skilled employment opportunities. Consequently, the DeW housing demand produced by the proposed project would be reduced to the extent that these tactors occur. The loss or seven potential dwelling un! ts and the addi tional deaand tor bousing due to the proposed project would be considered a lIinor, clBulative 1mpact considering the ex:l.sting bousing shortage regionally and locally. However, this 1mpact could be lIitigated through redesignation at other available and sUi table lands tor low density residential uses. DaveloPlent of the site tor oftice and research and develoPlent use would ilt- crease develoPlent pressure tor the adjacent residences located on cc.merc1ally zoned land to be redeveloped as COIIUIercial. RedevelolBent at these parcels would mean the loss ot tour existing single tally residences and replacement with Slall scale COIIUIercial develoPlent. Arty proposed new develolBent on the parcel would reqUire review and pel"'lllit approval by the C1 ty of Campbell. .mIJDATIQN MEASURES. The following measure should be implemented to mit.1gate adverse land use impacts. The City of Campbell may wish to consider redesignating additional land for high density residential uses to compensate for the loss' of future residential uses on the project site and increased housing demand 3-4 ~.2 CIRCULATION AND PARKING EYT~TING SETTING. This section has been adopted frCID the Traffic Stucty for the ProDOsed Office Buildini on Winchester Boulevard in the Ci ty of Campbell, prepared by Wilson and Porter Engineering, July, 1984. The traffic study is hereby incorporated by reference and a copy is on file at the City of Campbell Planning Department. 1.0(\..:11 AccAss. The proposed project site is located in the southern portion of the City of Campbell, adjacent to Winchester Boulevard, as shown in Figure 1-2 Access will be provided to Winchester Avenue as shown in Figure 1-3. The project site is linked to Highway 17 to the north, via Winchester Boulevard and the San TClDas Expressway, and to Highway 17 to the south, via Winchester Boulevard and Lark Avenue. The project site is linked to the Almaden Area via Winchester Boulevard, San Tomas Expressway and Camden Avenue. Winchester Boulevard, in the conj unction wi th the San Tomas Expressway, prOVides access to the west and access to the north is provided by Winchester Boulevard di rectly . Winchester Boulevard is a major north/south arterial in the Santa Clara Valley, extending north frCID the proposed project site to Santa Clara and south frCID the proposed site to Los Gatos. The roadway is a two-way, four lane facility in the project vicinity with exclusive left turn lanes at major intersections. There is also a two-way left turn lIedian lane between most intersections, but mt in front of the project site. Winchester Boulevard is fully improved with curbs and gutters along the majority of its length. However, the portion of Winchester Boulevard fronting the project site has not been fully improved, lacking curbs and gutters. The roadway currently experiences an average daily traffic vol UIIle (ADT) of approximately 20,300 vehicles in the project vicinity as shown in Figure 3.2-1 (City of Campbell, 1982/1983). Camden Avenue is a major east/west facility linking the City of Santa Clara with the Almaden Area in conjunction with the San Tomas Expressway. Camden Avenue intersects State Highway 17 with an interchange apprOximately one half mile east of Winchester Boulevard. Camden Avenue is fully improved with three lanes in each direction with exclusive left turn lanes at major intersections. The intersection of Camden Avenue with the southbound Highway 17 interchange ramps is controlled with traf'fic signals. Camden Avenue currently experiences an average daily two-way traf'fic volUllle of approximately 63,000 vehicles directly east of Highway 17 (City of Campbell 1982/1983). San Tomas Expressway is a six lane, two-way facility linking the Ci ty of Santa Clara with the Almaden Area in conjunction with Camden Avenue. San Taaas Expressway effectively becomes Camden Avenue at Highway 17. San Taaas Expressway is fully improved to expressway standards with access l1mi ted to major intersections at apprOximately one half mile intervals. San Tomas Expressway intersects Winchester Boulevard with a grade separate interchange. Other roadways identified as having the potential to be utilized or by project related traffic are Sunny oaks Avenue, Old Camden Avenue, Avenue, Knowles Drive, Chapman Drive, Walnut Drive and Lark Avenue. Avenue is a minor two-way street which extends west fraa Winchester It also extends east frCID Dell Avenue where it functions as part of affected Hacienda Sunnyoaka Avenue. the 3-5 SB 11053 NB 12908 WE 2138 EB 1252 Sunnyoaks Ave. ~ C1I s:: ~ s... ::5 o WB 7791 EB 7608 SB 17715 NB 16931 WE 31232 EB 31949 PROJECT SITE WB 3388 EB 3075 Chapman Dr. Knowles Dr. SB 3927 NB 4031 SB 10652 NB 9632 WB 1686 EB 1839 . r-- .-4 C1I ~ ::5 0 p:: Q) ~ cd ~ tn SB NB ~ C1I ~ to C1I ~ C> ~ ~ DRAWN BY JW AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES Source; City of Campbell (1982-1983) ~ ~ [J;; WILSON & PORTER ENGINEERING [> [7 \J ~ ~ 70 ZOE · SUITE 200 · SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94107 CHEC~ED BY ,TW JOB NA ME SCALE NTS 3-6 . Q) > ex: s:: Q) 't:I ~ o Q) > ex: m .!II:: aI o Q) ~ .r-! .c :3: FIGURE NO. 3.2-1 Winchester Boulevard/San Tomas Expressway intersection. Old Camden Avenue is a minor, two-way roadway extending southeast f'rom Winchester Boulevard, through an industrial area, and intersecting the westbound ramps on the San Tomas Expressway. !be intersection of' Old Camden Avenue and Winchester Boulevard is ourrently oontrolled with a yield sign on Old Camden Avenue. However, the intersection is to be signalized as part of' a project at that interseotion (see the discussion of' the proposed roadway improvements in this section). Hacienda Avenue is a two-way roadway extending east and west f'rom Winchester Boulevard. West of' Winchester Boulevard, Hacienda Avenue is f'ully improved to approximately 64 f'eet in some locations and is only partially improved with 30 f'eet of' pavement at other locations. !be roadway, where f'ully iDlproved to 63 f'eet, oonsists of' two lanes in eaoh direotion with on street parking. East of' Winchester Boulevard, Haoienda Avenue is f'ully improved with ourbs and gutters and one lane in each di reoti on. !be interseotion of' Winchester Boulevard and Haoienda Avenue is controlled with Signals and has exolusive lef't turn lanes on Winchester Boulevard. Hacienda Avenue currently experiences a two-way !DT of approximately 15,400 vehioles west of' Winohester and 7,500 vehioles east of' Winchester Boulevard (City of' Campbell, 1982/1983). Knowles Drive is a two-way roadway extending east and west f'rom Winohester Boulevard. West of' Winchester Boulevard, Knoles Drive is f'ully improved with ourbs, gutters, sidewalks and one lane in each direotion. East of' Winchester Boulevard, Knowles Drive is f'ully improved with curbs, gutters, a sidewalk on the south side, and two lanes in eaoh direotion. The intersection of' Knowles Drive and Winchester Boulevard is controlled with signals, and there are exclusive lef't turn lanes on Winchester Boulevard. Knowles Avenue currently experiences a two-way !DT of' approximately 2,500 vehicles east of Winchester Boulevard (City of' Campbell, 1982-1983). ChaPDan Drive and Walnut Drive are minor, two-way residential streets located adjacent to the project site. Both roadways are approximately 30 f'eet wide and have graded gravel shoulders. !be intersection of' ChaPDan drive and Winchester Boulevard is controlled with a stop sign on Chapaan Drive. Both Chapman Drive and Walnut Drive currently experience vel"f limited traff'ic vol \Illes. Lark Avenue is a maj or east-west roadway extending east f'rom Winchester Boulevard to South Bascom Avenueu in the Town of' L08 Gato8. Lark Avenue intersect8 Highway 17 with a grade-separated interchange. The intersection of' Lark Avenue and Winchester Boulevard i8 controlled with signa18. HaltOM] .lcaeas. Regional Acces8 to the project vicinity is provided by Highway 17. Highway 17 i8 a major f'acility which extends northeast f'rom the project vicini ty to the City of' Oakland along the easterly edge of' San Francisco Bay. Highway 17 extends southwesterly f'rom the proposed project si te, through the Town of' Los Ga tos, to the Ci ty ot Santa Cruz. Highway 17 i8 tully iDlproved to treeway sta tU8 in the proj ect vicini ty and intersect8 both the San Toma8 Expressway and Lark Avenue wi th grade-separated interchange8. Intersection Levels ot Serviae. The operating characteristics of' an intersection can be described in the standardized tormat ot level ot service (LOS). The LOS is a qualitative description ot an intersection's quality of 3-7 operation based on delay and maneuverability. LOS can range t'rcm A, representing free flow oonditions, to F, meaning j8DUlled oonditions. In this report, both the City of San Jose's and the Transportation Research Board's methodologies for caloulating LOS based upon the volume to oapaoi ty ratio (v/o) of critical movements were employed to analyze the fOllowing signalized interseotions under various conditions. Both methodologies were used to allow review or this report by the City of San Jose, whioh relies ezxolusively on their methodology; the City of Campbell, whioh has previously used both; and the Town of Los Gatos, whioh relies on the Transportation Researoh Board's methodology. 'n1e possible levels of service together wi th their respeotive desoriptions are shown in Table 3.2-1. 'n1ere were six major, Signalized (or soon to be signalized) interseotions which were identified as having the potential to be significantly affeoted by the proposed proj eot. 'n1e ourrent A. M. and P. M. peak hour LOS of these interseotions are presented in Tables 3.2-3 and 3.2-4. Review or these tables show the interseotion of Camden Avenue and the southbound State Route 17 ramps is currently operating at capaCity (LOS E) during the evening peak hour, as calculated using the City of San Jose's methodology. 'n1e remaining inter- sections all operate at a LOS D or better during the peak hours. Ttoansi t. Transi t in the proj ect vicini ty is currently provided by the Santa Clara County Transit District with Routes 38 and 60. Route 38 extends between the Monterey Center in San Jose and the Los Gatos/Saratoga COIIDlunity Hospital in Los Gatos, and utilizes a portion ot Hacienda Avenue in the project vicini ty. Route 38 operates on one-half hour headways during both the peak and off-peak periods. Route 60 extends between Great America in Santa Clara and Los Gatos. In the project vicinity, Route 60 travels west on Hacienda Avenue towards the Los Gatos/Saratoga COIIJIlunity Hospital, returning eastbound on Knowles Avenue to Winohester Boulevard, and then traveling south on Winchester to Los Gatos. Route 60 operates on 15 minute headways during peak periods and 30 ~nute headways during off-peak periods. PropoSAd Hoadv~y ImDrovements. 'n1ere are currently a ntllber or roadway improvements proposed in the project area as part or other, already approved projects. 'n1e intersections of Winchester Boulevard with Old Camden Avenue and Surmyoaks Avenue are to be signalized as part or the approved research and development project at the intersection of Old Camden Avenue and Winchester Boulevard scheduled for completion within the next two years. An exclusive left turn will be added to westbound Hacienda Avenue at Winchester Boulevard as part or the Zllog project scheduled for completion within the next two years. 'n1e intersection of Oka Road east or Winchester Boulevard in the Town of Los Gatos is to be signalized as part of an approved project within Los Gatos, and Santa Clara County is in the process of adding a High Occupancy Vehicle Lane (HOV) to the San TClDas Expressway. In this analysis, all or the above 1IIlprovements are assumed completed when this project is completed except for the HOV lane on the San Tomas Expressway. IMPACTS Ttoip Generation. The project as currently proposed would consist or 63,10_ gross square feet of office and research and developaent floor space. Using 3-8 TABLE 3.2-1. INTERSECTION LEVELS OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS LEVEL OF SEEVIeE A E C D E , IITEliPRETATION Uncongested operations, no vehicle required to wait longer than one C7cle, all turns oan be made easily. Slightly more traffio than LOS A, but intersection remains unoongested and no one waits through mare than one red light to pass through. Light oongestion with oocasional backups on the critical approaches and a minor number of vehicles .ay have to wait through more than one red cycle. Signifioant congestion on the critioal approaohes, with vehioles waiting through more than one red light to pass through the intersection. !he intersection, however, remains funotional and no escessive bsokups oocur. Severe ooneestion on all critioal approaches with long backups and aubstantial delays during abort periods of time. Blockage of the tntersection .ay ooour if traffic aignal does not provide for proteoted turning .ovements. Baokups .S7 block other intersections upstream of the oritioal approaohes. 'otal breakdoYD of the tnterseotion with stop and go operation, escessive baokups, and blookage of the intersection and other upstream interseotions. VOLUlE/ CAPACITY RATIO less than .599 .600 - .699 .700 -.799 .800 -.899 .900 -.999 1.0 and greater 10'ES: 1 . !he Ci t1 of San Jose's Level of Service Poli01 requires all interseotions to operate at a LOS of aD- or better. A traffic .ovement Dr approaoh is oritioal if it is part of, or affeots the flow of, the traffic .oving in the peak direotion. Souroe: Cit1 of San Jose Trsffio Operations Division, 1984. 3-9 the Institute of Transportation Engineers trip generation factors, it is estimated that the project would generate approximately 776 one way trips per day, as shown on Table 3.2-2. Table 3.2-2 also shows projected A. M. and P. M. peak hour trips which would be generated by the proposed project. TABLE 3.2-2. PROPOSED PROJECT TRIP GENERATION FACTOR (a) ONE WAY TRIPS Average Daily Trips 12.3/1000 GSF (b) 776 A. M. Peak Hour Inbound 1.86/1000 GSF 117 Outbound .3511000 GSF 22 P. M. Peak Hour Inbound .27/1000 GSF 17 Outbound 1.36/1000 GSF 86 (a) Insti tute of Transpor ta ti on Engi neers, 1979. (b) GSF = Gross Square Feet. Trip Distribution. The forecast trips which would be generated b1 the proposed project were distributed to the surrounding network as shown in Figure 3.2-2. This distribution was obtained frClll City of Campbell staff (Manley, 1984) and is based upon existing trip making patterns adjusted to local roadway conditions. The distribution assumes 35 percent of the project related trips would be to and frClll north, 17 percent to and frClll the west, 33 percent to and frClll the south, and 15 percent to and frClll the Almaden area. The A.M. and P.M. peak hour assignments of project related trips to the surrounding roadway network are shown in Figure 3.2-3 and 3.2-4, respectively. Intersection Level ~ Service Analysis. The impact of the proposed project on the surrounding roadway network was identified and evaluated using a level of service analysis (LOS) which is a standardized method of evaluating an intersection's operating characteristics. This evaluation of operating characteristics is bone b1 relating tra1'fic volUlles, existing or proposed, to the roadway or intersection capaCity in the form of a critical volume to capacity rate (v/c). The increase in critical volumes is what is actually used to identity significant impacts to intersections within the Cities of Campbell and San Jose. Ci ty of Campbell staff identified seven locations which had the potential to be affected by the proposed project. Six of these are signalized inter- sections which are listed in Tables 3.2-3 and 3.2-4, together with their projected LOS, assuming several scenarios. The proposed project is evaluated for both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours with regard to conditions ass1llling completion of other approved projects. The other approved projects include 3-10 7'O/1]a S Ex. 1 . ~ Sunnyoaks Ave. Hacienda Ave. PROJECT SITE Chapman Dr. Knowles Dr. ~t So. Q) s:: ~ Sol ::5 o 2% --- . Q) ::- c:x: c Q) "'l: a 0 Q) ::- < .' ~t t1J ~ C"- as ..... 0 Q) Q) ~ ~ ::5 ..... 0 .c:: /:t: 3: Q) ~ as ~ tJ) Lark .4~e 18% · ~ DRAWN BY JW CHEC~ED BY TRIP DISTRIBUTION \TW JOB NA ME FIGURE NO. ~~~ [7 \J i::j=7 ~ WILSON & PORTER ENGINEERING t> 70 ZOE . SUITE 200 . SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94107 NTS 3.2-2 SCAL.E 3-11 Hacienda Ave. 23 ~ J 5 SfitrJ 2"OllJa ~ s~. 18___ 3 3 .-- 18 Sunnyoaks Ave. ~ 1 .....- . Q) > < s: Q) '0 a 0 . 1) 16 Q) > -=: m .!ad t'- as .... 0 Q) Q) ~ ~ =' .r-! 0 .c IX: ~ Q) ~ as ~ tI2 PROJECT SITE Chapman Dr. Knowles Dr. TOTAL A.M. PEAK HOUR TRIPS: Inbound 117 Outbound 22 DRAWN BY JW A.M. PEAK HOUR PR OJECT RELATED TRAFFIC CHECt(ED IY ,TW JOB NA ME FIGURE NO. [!;Y] [o:J ~ [7 \:J~~ WILSON & PORTER ENGINEERING [> 70 ZOE . SUITE 200 · SAN FRANCISCO. CA "1Cl'7 3.2-3 SCAL.E NTS ':l._1? 1 3~ 3~ 117 SEU2 2"Ol1Ja ~ 8~. 2 ----.... 13 13 ...-- T.4 G> s::: ~ ~ ::5 o 2 Sunnyoaks Ave. - 2 ...-. . C1l > ex: s::: C1l 't:' a o Hacienda Ave. PROJECT SITE t'- .... . G> > ex: CD .kl as o Chapman Dr. 4! t 1 Knowl.es Dr. CD G> ~ ~ ::5 ..-4 o .c ex: ~ G> ~ as .p:t tn TOTAL P.M. PEAK HOUR TRIPS: Inbound 17 Outbound 86 DRAWN BY JW P. M. PEAK HOUR PROJECT RELATED TRAFFIC CHECI(ED BY ,TW Joe NA ME FIGURE NO. 3 ot2-4 ~~u;; [7 \JG='~ WILSON & PORTER ENGINEERING t> 70 ZOE . SUITE 200 · SAN FRANCISCO. CA "'07 SCAL.E NTS 3-13 !lI:l U 1-1 & en er. o en E3 &1 ..::I c:.:: 5 = w :i ~ aI U U aI ... c:: III at 0 t/) U .:: I .... 0 ... U =- '" ,.J UN I 111 0 =- '1"4 aI ClIO '" ....N .... U '1"4 .... aI '" U U ... 111 111 ....U S .... 111 ... U :1:- :s .... .-4 '" -> .-4 .... :s = =- 0 111 U "'.... > ... ... U "'.... UH _ _ t) ..,- - 1IQ " ,c '" 0 N III H H H H H 0\ '" U >- ... = - U C"'\ Q - GO 0\ \C U~ ""Ill ... . . . . . . _ .., .:: " U 0 - - N Q 0 '" 0"0 - '" = III ... _ - I 1-1 .... a.C _ ::I .... c:: ... U C.... _ 0 .-4 U Ql .:: S : 111 'cOO =->- . U =- I .., aI "'~ Ot/) 0 '" III C i + "'0 << << <= << <Q UQ '" = III _ I ~..J Ill: U S i 00 "0 UQ '1"4 :s = + Ql '1"4: .... .-4 '1"4 aI .... '1"4 0 I '" . :s '1"4'" = > I a1"O C III ClIO .-4- U - '" GO \0 '" _ 00 .-4 .... I ~ a.- GO 0\ N~ NN N '" GO\C -~ S '1"4>- aI 111 !lI:l a.> C"'\ C"'\ '" '" '" \C '" '" '" CO .... GO :s a1"O U < . . . . . . . . . . . . .... III a1.... 0 1IQ Ql .... '" > ....... '1"4 .-4 '" ... _ '" III U U .:: U 111 ! '" III aI a._ i a. '1"4 S,c , aI . '1"4'" "0 '1"4 '1"4 en I - en 0 c:: aI a.O << << <= << <Q UQ I C::..J III _ a...::I 111 aI < - Ql _ III Q .... .-4,C aI _ + ClCl 0 .-4'" 0 ... I _0\ > _ ..,U . C"'\ ~ \0 C"'\_ .J:j Ql = I "'u ClOO\ N~ N- -~ GO~ O~ ClCl - .... a.... ='1"4 a1_ C"'\ C"'\ '" '" '" \0 '" '" ",CO .... GO 0\ III . Ql III I '1"4> . . . . . . . . . . . . -N U II':: enu I ~ -- '1"4 U =- .-4 I !lI:l N '" .... .... >- .-4 .... 1IQ 0.... 00... ... o _ II o II U II ~... .... .... >-111 .,'" o ::I . ., U '1"4 "OU ... .... U'" . o ... _ U c:: U ~ en ,C'1"4 i '1"4 = _ CO I 000 << << << << <U lilY "'u c:: .-4 .., 0\ =..::1 _ '1"4" '::0 - i .-4 . .. . ,C'" '" ... '" ." i .., . .-4 a. .. 1IQ c:l ... '1"4- =- 00 i .-4 o II =- = .... . ." oS I ~U \C \C '" GO .... '1"4 0 .... ." .-4 : . !lI:l_ ~~ G\ - G\ GO ClO- .-0 ... N ,,= 0 "0 III _ er. N ... > C"'\ C"'\ .. '" .. '" . '" lI'\ CO \0 .... III > _,c c:~= .-4 _ . . . . . . . . . . . . .....:: ='" 'l"4N .... _ I ::I U .... '1"4 .... ... III oS I U ... III .... _ _ ... 0 fo 1 ....1lI U _ ... .,,0 00 i III _ .. ." 0 - .-4 r5 ! UII .., . . "f . . .-4 -=>- <: i U. ... f . ... I ." aI U ,.CI .., .-4 _ -0 N N N N N N o = . III " -.:: ..,- ..,- ..,- ..,- ..,- ..,- .., 0 = · G III =- = ... - '" enN cnN cnN enN cnN cnN .. .-4 ... . ..,O~ 0 0 _ ='" u :s u .... ." .-4 ~ :II: II 111 _ 11.-4 II at II .., Cf.I'" . . a.0 a.,.CI _ U ." ... III 0 . > . ... . = .... 0 .'1"4 1-1 I-ICf.I.... . III Oa. .." .... . o III .. - - . U II ... III >- .....::1 . = lI'\ lI'\ ~= c: .. r: U ClIO c:: . .., 0 - - ... III .-4 III '1"4 0 ...-4 a II .-4... ~ U".-4 U .... .... r: . .. . . . Ui-l ...... '1"4'1"40 'l"4l1Qcn '1"4 0 ..... r:.-4 ........" .....0 . :s '1"4 .. a .. .. ... ... -a. . . . U 'l"4UO 'l"4U.... i , ... . .. .. . . . . . ~! U . = .:: = ::I I U ...." "oM .... .., .., N ...a. 00_'" 00 "0 _ .. _ . . . . .." . . . ..,- .. . 'I"4,c_ .-4_':: . at . .. III .. 0 at = .. at .. =:c.... Cf.IN ~U Cf.I"'. Cf.I...... ~ U ... .cu .c~ .c at .c.... '5 oM III .... ... .. U U r: U.-4 ~ ~ 1.;0 :s .., =." a r: r: U r:... - - - - - 0 = .-4.... .-4::1 .-4. ;a .-4. ..... - N C"'\ ~ lI'\ Cf.I 1-1 30 3Cf.1 3= 3..::1 uca- - - - - - . ::E . < C"'\ I N C"'\ !lI:l ..::I ~ i-l ....... "; 3"'"-14 III U U .: III ... as U Otf.l U ..c ..-40 ... :- 4J,.,J tJN tJ as 0 .:- ..-4 III llO 4.1 ..-4N ~ U ..-4 ~ II) 4.1 GI U ... as as ..-4U m 'P'l as ... tJ :E- ~~ 4.1 -> ~ ~ ::s .: :a 0 as tJ 4.1..-4 > ... ... tJ 4.1..-4 UN II al t.) ....,- - III N ..c 4.1 0 N as tot tot tot tot tot M 4.1 tJ>- ... .: - II 0\ \C 0 M 0\ \C II,Q c:a.as ... . . . . . II ...., ..c tot tJ 0 0 M .-I 0 0 4.1 0'0 _ 4.1 c:: as ... al - l-l ~ c:a.c:: U ::s ..-4 c:: ... tJ .:~ al 0 ~ al al 'i e as ..coo tJ :- >- ...., II) 4J,Q Otf.l 0 4.1 as c:: + "'0 << == t.)t.) c::l~ c::lc::l Iloolloo 4.1 c:: as al j:l.o,.,J as: tJ e 00 '0 tJc::l 'P'l ::s c:: + U ..-4: ~~ ..-4 III ~ ..-4 0 4.1 . ::s 'P'l4J .: > 11)'0 c:: as llO ..-4- t.) U"l \C 0\ \C \C \0 j llO ..-4~ >C c:a._ -M .-I .;t .-I CO M- 0- U"l N ..-4>- II) as ~ c:a.> U"l U"l \C \C I' ,... CO 0\ CO CO ON 11)'0 tJ < . . as 11I..-4 .-I _ 0 II) U ..-44.1 > ..-4 ... ..-4 ~ 4.1 ... al 4.1 as tJ tJ ,.C tJ as 4.1 as III c:a.al c:a...-4 e..c II) e ..-44.1 '0 ..-4 ..-4tf.l - tf.l 0 .: III c:a.O << == t.)t.) c::l~ t.)c::l Iloolloo U ':,.,J as al c:a.,.,J e as III < - ::s al al c:I 0 .-4 ~..c III U + CO 0 ~4J 0 ... - Q'\ > II .., tJ . N 0\ 0\ 0\ M- ,Q al .: .;t 4JU -M _M 0U"l NO 0\ - .;t - CO- ~ c:a.... ':..-4 11I_ U"l U"l \C \C I' ,... CO 0\ I' CO ON 0\ as e U as CO Q'\ ..-4> . . . . . . . . -N tJ as..c tf.l tJ - ~ -- -- 'P'l t.) :- 'P'l N 4.1 ~~ .. >- 'P'l ~ III O~ ~ 00... ... o al as ~ o as tJ III >-... al .-4~ >-as :f4J ,Q ~ o ::s al 4.1 tJ C) -atJ ... 'P'l t.)4J ~ o ... al t.) .: tJ l-l en ,.C..-4 'i ..-4 c:: al tlI ~ 000 << <= =t.) t.)c::l t.)t.) ~Iloo 4JC) .: ..-4...., C) ':,.,J al 'P'lH "cO ~ tf.l ..-4 II .. II) ,.Cln 4.1 ... 0 4.1 '0 I 4.1 . opfc:a. ~ III c:: ... ..-4_ :. >- 0 ..-4 o III :- .: ~ . -a 4.1 >CC) I' I' \0 - .;t U"l opf 0 ~ '0..-4: II ..-4 tf.l ~- U"l \C CON \C N 0\ \C \C I' - \0 4.1= 0 '0 III U Iloo N U ,.,J > .;t .;t U"l \C \0 I' I' CO I' ,... 0\0 as > U..c c:: ,,= opf ~ . . . . . . . . . . .-4..c ':4.1 ..-4N .-4 &j .-I ::s tJ ~ ..-4 ~ ... as .;t tJ ... as .... u u ... 0 ~ .-4 as tJ al ... -a 0 CO ,.,J as al ..-4 '0 0 opf Q'\ -f - Cl: t.) II) 4.1 II .:I: III 5 II 'P'l CD .. uCl: ... <>- c::l CD ... '0 II) tJ ,Q - 4.1 opf == - al -0 N N N N N N o .: . ClI 4.1 ~ -..c ..,- ..,- "'.-1 "'.-1 "'.-1 ..,- .., 0 c:: . u II) :. g ... - 4.1 en N enN CI) N Cl)N CI) N en N ..-4 ..-4 4.1 e 4.10>- 0 U ':4.1 tJ ::s tJ~-a opf j:l.o p.. :E as as u 1lI~ as U III 4.1 tf.l4J III . c:a.0 c:a.,Q U tJ '0 ... as 0 II > II ... .U . ~ 0 U'P'l l-l l-lCl).-4 . c:: x o c:a. "'4.1 ~ . o as ... tlI . p.. - - III CJ as ~ as >- ~,.,J .. c:: U"l U"l >-.: .: ... .: CJ 00 .: . ~ 0 - - ~ III 'P'l as 'P'l 0 asas'P'l c:: III 'P'l'" >- CJ~~ CJ 1-4 ~ i c:: .., .., .., .., .., t.)E04 ~4J 'P'l'P'l0 'P'lIllCl) ..-4 0 I' III C::'P'l ~...'O ....UO . :a N 'P'l ... c:: ... ... ... ... .-Ic:a. . . U CJ 'P'lCJO 'P'lCJ.-4 i . ~ U U U III U U U ..,~! CJ as ~U.z c:: ::s M CJ 401'0 401~ 401 as 401 ~ N ...c:a. 00 '0 U U : I . as .'0 CD . . ..,- U as 'P'l..c U 'P'lU,.C . al rz:l III U 0 U c:: U U III .:=.... en N p.. tJ tf.l~e CI)"'~ . ... ,.Ct.) ,.C~ ..cU ,.C.-4 '5~ U .... < tJ ,.,J ... = U CJ tJ c:: CJ'P'l ~ ~ '0 .0 ::s < ~ .:-a c:: c:: c:: CJ c:: ... I~I' - - - - - 0 c:: 'P'l .-4 'P'l ::s 'P'las ~~ opfCll .-I N M .;t U"l Eo4 l-l :aO :acn :a= :a,.,J t.)en.-l - - - - - en 3-15 the Campbell Business Park, a research and development project at 743 and 749 Camden Avenue in Campbell, an office development on Lark Avenue in the Town of Los Gatos, improvements to the Jewish Center on Lark Avenue in Los Gatos, and other developments in the City ot San Jose, inoluding the development of the Bonnet School site. The existing LOS of the intersections are also included within the Tables 3.2-3 and 3.2-4. Definitions of LOS are provided in Table 3.2-1. Of the six intersections listed in Tables 3.2-2 and 3.2-3, five are within the city limits of Campbell and one within the boundaries of Los Gatos. The City of Campbell has established criteria for evaluating changes in LOS and determining when impacts are significiant. Tables 3.2-3 and 3.2-4 show the ci ty' s criteria and intersections which would be significantly affected b1 the proposed project based upon this criteria. The Town of Los Gatos considers the addi tion of any traffic to an intersection operating at LOS E or below significant. Review of Table 3.2-3 shows no intersections would be significantly affected by the proposed project during the A.M. peak hour, when evaluauted with regard to City of Campbell criteria. The intersection of Winchester Boulevard with Old Camden Avenue, Sunny oaks Avenue, Hacienda Avenue and Knowles Drive all operate at LOS A or B currently and are projected to continue to do 80 when other approved projects are completed and when the proposed project is completed. The intersection of Camden Avenue and the southbound Highway 17 ramps would not realize a significant increase in traffic fram the proposed project, nor would the intersection of Winchester Boulevard and Lark Avenue whhen evaluated by City of Campbell standards. (An increase in critical volumes must be greater than 1.5 percent to be significant). Review or Table 3.2-4 shows no interseotion would be significantly affected by the proposed project during the P.M. peak hour. The intersections of Winchester Boulevard with Hacienda Avenue, Old Camden Avenue and Sunny oaks Avenue all currently operate at a LOS C or better, and are projected to continue to do so when other, already approved projects are completed and when the proposed proj ect is completed. The intersection of Camden Avenue and the southbound Highway 17 ramps is projected to operate at LOS F when other, already approved projects are completed and when the proposed project is completed. However, the intersection would not realize a Significant increase in traffic volumes (less than 1.5 percent) as a result of the proposed project and so would not be affected Significantly. Other locations identified by City of Campbell staff as having the potential to be impacted by the proposed project include Chapman Drive, Walnut Drive, the grade-separated intersection of Winchester Boulevard and the San Tamas Expressway and access to the project site. Chapman Drive and Walnut Drive are minor streets adjacent to the project s1 te and extending through a residential area. They currently experience vel"1 l1mi ted traffic volumes, and it is anticipated that completion of the proposed project would not increase existing traffic volumes on these streets. No direct access to these streets is proposed and almost all project related trips will be oriented toward other areas and as a result use the major arterials as indicated in Figure 3.2-2. 3-16 Review of Figure 3.2-3 shows the proposed project would add approximately -7 vehicles to the westbound San Tanas Expressway offramp to southbound Winchester Boulevard during the morning peak hour. This is a free running ramp without traffic control and should not be significantly affected by the project. The proposed project would have a negligible impact on the remaining San Tanas Expressway ramps at Winchester Boulevard during the A. M. peak hour. During the evening peak hour, the proposed project would add approximately 3- vehicles to the eastbound on ramp fran northbound Winchester Boulevard, as indicated in Figure 3.2-JJ. The ramp itself currently experiences a limited amount of traffic during the P.M. peak hour (241 vehicles in 1984). However, traffic eastbound on the San Tanas Expressway does back up to the merge point of this ramp fran the intersection of the San Taaas Expressway/Camden Avenue intersection with Highway 17, forcing a wait to merge on to eastbound San Tomas Expressway. The proposed project would increase current traffic volume by apprOximately 14 percent to 275 vehicles during the P. M. peak hour. Com- pletion of the proposed project would have a negligible impact on the inter- change San Taaas Expressway at Winchester Boulevard during the P.M. peak hour. n""Vf!!W~:ys/Si tfll Aat!fllss. The project as currently proposed would have access to Winchester Boulevard at two points, one on the northerly and the other on the southerly edge of the building. As currently proposed, these would be 25 foot wide driveways extending west into the proposed parking area. Winchester Boulevard, in front of the project site, has not been fully improved yet. When fully improved, it would include two travel lanes in each direction and a two way left turn lane in the center. When these improvements are COIIlp1eted particularly the two way left turn lane) access to the site will occur safely and efficiently. A left turn lane will be present to provide safe left turns into the proj ect si te from northbound Winchester Boulevard and a safe storage area will be provided in the center of Winchester Boulevard for northbound vehicles turning left out of the proj ect and wai ting to merge with northbound traffic on Winchester Boulevard. It' Winchester Boulevard is not improved, there will be the potential for rear-end collisions due to the fact- that northbound vehicles on Winchester Boulevard, wa! ting to turn left into the si te, will be forced to stop in a through lane. Pa,.kinr. The project, as currently proposed, would include a total or 252 par1d.ng stalls. Of these, 67 (26.6 percent) would be compact size stalls and 185 would be full size stalls. This equates to one stall for evel"Y 250 square feet or 1"1oor space. This is in conformance with the City of Campbell's park- ing ordinance for research and development projects but is not in conformance with parking requirElllents for office space (one stall for every 225 square feet of floor space). '!"roans" t. It is expected that the proposed project would have a Vel"Y minimal impact on local transit in the project vicinity. Experience has shown that most office commuters in the Santa Clara Valley rely upon the private aute>- mobile for tzoansportation almost exclusively. PfIldfllstrian and BiQycle ACaAS8. The proposed project should not have a significant impact on pedestrian or bicycle access in the area. Currently there are limited pedestrian facilities and pedestrian traffic in the area which should not be affected by construction of the proposed project. It is anticipated that almost all project related traffic would rElllain on major 3....17 streets, particularly Winchester Boulevard in the project vicinity, and not utilize or impact pedestrian or bicycle trar~ic on minor residential streets in the proj ect area. Crosswalks are currently provided ~or pedestrians at intersections along Winchester Boulevard and traftic generated by the proposed project would not adversely a1"tect the operation 01' these tacilities. There are no exclusive bicycle tacilities on Winchester Boulevard and a potential tor bicycle/auto conf'licts could be present at the driveways into the project site. However, this potential would not be any lIore severe than is already present at all other driveways along Winchester Boulevard. Fully improving Winchester Boulevard in tront of the project site with a two-way left turn and widening the outer travel lane on the west side would further reduce the potential tor conflicts and probably improve upon existing sa~ety levels. MITmATYON MEASURES. The tollowing measures are suggested to mitigate the adverse traftic related impacts which would be associated with the proposed proj ect. Improve the west aide of Winchester Boulevard in tront of the project site to tull standards, including prcwision 01' a two-way lett turn lane. Provide preferential parking or other incentives to encourage car and vanpooling. Prcmote the use 01' staggered work hours or tlex time to the degree pOSSible. 3-18 ~. ~ VISUAL CHARAC'l'ER F.YT~TING SETTING. The project 3i te comprises 3.42 acres in an urbanized setting on Winchester BOulevard west of Highway 11 and south of San Tomas Expressway. The topography of the site is fairly level. The project s1 te is currently vacant and undeveloped. The site is covered with wild grasses and weeds, except for an unvegetated gravel area abutting Winchester Boulevard. Mature domestic variety trees are sca t tered over the s1 te, and a few large bushes border the s1 te near Winchester Boulevard. Wooden and chain link fencing exists between the site and the neighboring development to the north, west and south. The site is located between Hacienda Avenue (to the north) and Chapman Drive (to the south). Hacienda Avenue is a two lane street with a lIix of new and older, one and two story single and lIul ti-family residential buildings. Adjacent buildings include the newer, two story Hacienda Village townhouses, and generally older Bingle family hOlIes. '1\10 story office buildings are loca ted east of the s1 te across Winchester Boulevard, and other one and two story commercial and industrial buildings exist along Winchester Boulevard to the north and south of the si tee View Corridors. A view corridor is a vista spanning a distant area frOll a point of visual origin. View corridors described in this report originate frOll likely viewer vantage points and focus on the proposed project s1 tee These views are depicted in Figure 3.3-1, Plates A, B, and C. Plates A and B show views of the northern and southern halves of the site, respectively, looking west frOll Winchester Boulevard. Plate C shows the view into the site through the existing fence located on Walnut Drive. Plate D shows the existing office buildings located across frOll the project on Winchester Boulevard. Residents and commercial tenants in two story buildings have views of tall trees, sOlIe businesses along Winchester Boulevard and residences on nearby streets. View Qnnortuni ties. The project s1 te provides little or no viewing opportuni ties of significant natural features. The si te is s1 tua ted in an urban setting comprised or orfice, CClIIDlercial and residential develollDent, which comprise the dominant visual features for viewers on the si tee IMPACTS Proposed Project. The proposed r.oval or the existing vegetation on site and construction of an office and a research and development building and parking area would significantly alter the visual character of the site. Figure 1-3 displ81S the layout or the proposed structures. The building would be two stories tall, with surface parking. The total building coverage at project buildout would be 31,552 square feet or 21 percent of the site area. The proposed parking and driveways would occupy 60 percent of the s1 tee The remaining 19 percent or the site would be landscaped. The office building would be primarily off white with terra cotta colored piperail to provide greater visual interest. Building materials would cons1st primarily of glass and cement. Landscaping would provide a partial butfer from adjacent areas, and would include trees and shrubs around the perimeter 3-19 3-20 E-t ~ p.. 0 o-J ~ . > ~ ~ c > E-t ~ Z ~o-J ~ E-tO U 1-l0 < tf.li:Q ..., ~~ 5l i5~ Q tf.l ~ ~~ O::C U ~ ~z o-JI-l I-l ~~ tf.l ~ E-t ZO U ~ ~ ~~ .., ::cc 0 E-tl-l ~ ~tf.l p.. 0 ZE-t ~ ~~ ~ =~ E-t ~ ~ 0 ~= OE-t ~ ~~ ~ I-l I-l~ > >~ . < - I ~ r"'l j . M p.. ~ 0 ~ I-l ~ 3-21 E-I :z: rz:l ~ 0 ...:l ~ rz:l j:l E-I ~ :z: rz:l u ~ < .., rz:l...:l ~ E-IO ~O enl:Cl ~ rz:lCE:: ~~ rz:l en E-I ~rz:l ~ 0= en u ~:z: E-I ...:l~ u ~~ ~ ~ 0 :Z:O IX: CE::rz:l l:l.. ~j:l rz:l E-I~ = oen E-I 0 cnE-l ~ en 0 rz:l< ~rz:l en rz:l ~ ~= ~ OE-l > ~~ ~~ - 'tl QJ . ::l I:Cl c: 'P"l rz:l ~ !( c: 0 ...:l t) l:l.. - - I ("'l . t"'l rz:l ~ t.:I ~ ~ PLATE C. VIEW OF THE SITE THROUGH THE WALNUT DRIVE GATE. PLATE D. EXISTING OFFICE DEVELOPMENT EAST OF THE SITE ON WINCHESTER BOULEVARD. FIGURE 3.3-1 (continued). VIEWS OF THE PROJECT SITE AND ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT 3-22 of the building, on all tour boundaries of the site, and interspersed in the parking area as planned by the developer (see Figure 1-3). The project would increase light and glare to adjacent areas due to reflection fraD windows and light fraD the building and parking area. The height and mass of the office structure would provide a significant change to the existing visual character and urban fOMll of the si te and surrounding residential land uses. Adj acent and nearby structures vary frail one to two stories. The height and visual scale or the proposed structure would be consistent wi th that of cOlllllercial office and warehouse developnents in the vicini ty. The proposed two story building would be visible trail adjacent two story land uses, including other oaamercial buildings on Winchester Boulevard and the Hacienda Village Townhalles. The building would be less visible to one story structures, due to the six foot masonry wall proposed tor the perimeter of the si te bordering residential areas and the proposed setback trail the property line. Individual views ot the site lIay be blocked by landscaping 01" other foreground objects. The placement ot the higher otfice building towards the commercial area on Winchester Boulevard and the low parking area towards the residential uni ts reduces the visual impact of the building to those residences. The proposed si te design may be preferable to that or the existing vacant lot due to the proviSion of more orderly landscaping and a less neglected appearance. View Corridors. The proposed building would eliminate views of the trees on si te and partial views of Winchester Boulevard trail some residences. The building would not be visible fraD more than one 01" two blocks traD the site, and would have no Significant view corridor impacts. View Opportuni ties. The project would create no new public viewing opportuni ties. Private tenants in offices at the upper story, however, would have views ot cOlllllerc1al buildings on Winchester BOulevard, residential developnent to the north, south and west ot the site, and the percolation ponds to the north. MITmATION MEASURES Landscaping on si te should be of the type and size to lIinimize views ot the building frail adjacent residences. Low reflective glass should be used to minimize glare and light frail the project building. WaMll tone lights on low protile dark standards should be considered tor the parking area lighting. 3-23 1.4 STORM DRAlNNiE/WATER QUALITY EXT~TING SETTING. The proj ect si te is currently undeveloped and generates little or no stormwater runoff. The c1 ty maintains storm drain lines in the vicinity, including an 18 inch line in Walnut Drive west of the site. No storm drain lines exist in Winchester Boulevard east of the si tee Stormwater runoff from the Walnut Drive line flows into a 27 inch line in Hacienda Avenue, where it flows west and eventually drains into San Tomas Creek or Smi th Creek (King, 1984). IMPACTS Stormwater Runoff. Additional impervious surface area due to the proposed project building and parking structure would cause a considerable increase in the volume of water draining from the site as runoff. Drainage from the proposed project could be accommodated by the existing 18 inch storm drain located in Walnut Drive, and larger, connecting lines in Hacienda Avenue. project si te plans would be reviewed for proper storm drainage facHi ties the public works department prior to plan approval (King, 1984). The by Wabr OU::Il of t.y. Storm runoff would wash contaminants, principally sil t, oil, grease and particulates containing lead, from parking and driveway surfaces of the proposed project. Although the contaminant levels in the runoff would be higher than existing levels, they would represent only a nominal increase in the contaminant loads carried into San Tomas or Smith Creeks by urban runoff from the Campbell area. Development of the proposed project may create the potential for a surface spill of hazardous materials, depending on the materials handled by project tenants and the methods of handling that were emplqyed. A surface spill of hazardous materials would cause an unknown degree of water quality deterioration, destruction of aquatic wildlife and habitat, and associated human health hazards. The extent of this risk is indeterminable due to the mul tiplici ty of condi tions and events which could contribute to such an occurrence. However, with the extremely high flammability, corrosiveness, and toxicity of many of the chemicals used in the electronics industry, water quality contamination from spillage is potentially significant. The speed of detection and cleanup, ambient weather conditions, and type of chemicals invol ved with a spill would largely determine the severity of the resul ting water quality impacts if a spill were to occur. AI though the tenant composi tion of the proposed proj ect has yet to be finalized by the developer, project tenants may be involved to some extent in the handling of toxic or hazardous chemicals. With proper procedures for handling such chemicals and responding to spills, the potential impact on groundwater quality in the vicini ty of the proposed project should be reduced to an acceptable level. The site is located near groundwater recharge facilities and any surface runoff not routed into storm drains could percolate down to groundwater aquifers. For this reason, on site production and/or underground storage of such chemicals would justify a more serious level of concern and increase the potential for groundwater contamination impacts. At this time, no underground facilities are included in the site plan. 3-24 Storage of hazardous materials is regulated by the City of Campbell pursuant to Chapter 17.06 of T1 tIe 17 of the Campbell Municipal Code entitled "Fire Protection". Chapter 17.06 was added to the Campbell Municipal Code by the enactment of Ordinance No. 1453. This ordinance indicates the intent or the ci ty to protect heal th, life, resources, and property through prevention and control of unauthorized diSCharges of hazardous materials. The ordinance specifies requirements for storage including monitoring the storage area, containment standards, separation of materials that may combine to cause a fire or explosion, and drainage from a storage facility. The ordinance also regulates handling of hazardous materials, including mixing and transport. The requirements of Ordinance No. 1453 are enforced by the Ci ty of Campbell through a permit procedure and inspections. Inspections by an outside enti ty can be required by the city at the city's discretion. The term of a permit issued pursuant to Ordinance No. 1453 is five years. The permit can be revoked wi thin that term, and criminal or civil penal ties assessed, in the event of violations of the code. It would be the responsibility of some or all of the t'ollowing organizations to regulate any handling of toxic/hazardous substances SUbsequent to the developnent of the proposed project: the U. S. Department or Transportation; the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA); the State Department of Heal th Services; the City of Campbell; and, to a lesser extent, the Regional Water Quali ty Control Board. MITIDATION MEASURES The potential for contamination of surface or groundwater due to the possible use of hazardous materials on site can be adequately regulated within the existing framework ot' the city's Ordinance No. 1453 and the regulatory framework of other agencies with jurisdiction over hazardous materials, including the U.S. Department of Transportation, U.S. EPA, California Department of Heal th Services, and Regional Water Quality Control Board. Such regulations include the use of adequate containerization of hazardous materials. The proposed project may provide facilities that could be used in conjunction with processes involving hazardous materials. Approval of this proj ect does not guarantee the approval by the c1 ty or any tenant's specific applications to store or handle hazardous materials on s1 tee The following mitigation measure not in current project plans is recOllUllended to ensure that the developer and architect will consider the special needs of potential users of the s1 te: The developer should reoognize that certain users, such as those engaged in research and developaent oould require oustom features such as hazardous materials storage, special fire rated walls, adjustable height loading platforms, scrubbers, ultra pure water, and wastewater treatment to rEllove heavy metals. The following mitigation measures are reoommended to minimize the proposed project's potential impact on surface water and groundwater quality. The applioant shall arrange for connection to adequate storm drain lines for the projeot. Final drainage plans should be approved by the ci ty public works department. 3-25 The landscaped areas o~ the proj ect s1 te should be designed to absorb runo~~ ~raa roors and walkways. A landscape aanagement program including the proper training of those involved in chemical application, should be implemented to minimize runoff or fertilizers and pesticides into the storm drainage SJst_. Parld.ng lots should be deSigned to avoid areas of standing water. A hydrologic investigation should be conducted at later design stages or the proposed project to evaluate a drainage plan once it is developed. 3-26 1&. AI. TERN ATlVES TO mE PROPOSED ACTION An analysis o~ reasonable al ternatives to the proposed project is presented in this section, focusing on general evaluations conducted for comparison with the proposed project. No site plans have been developed ~or these al ternatives. This section presents the likely envirolllental effects of the ~ollowing al ternatives: no project and mixed use develoiDent (ot'~ice and high densi ty residential). 4.1 NO PRnJECT The no project alternative ass\llles that developaent as proposed would not occur on the project site at the present time. The site would retain its vacant character. This al ternative would postpone enviromental impacts on local public services, traffic, aesthetics, and the jobs/housing situation that would be associated with most eventual uses ot' the site. Given that the si te is privately owned and has been planned for COIIlDIercial and residential uses, it is probable that another proposal t'or developaent o~ the site would be sulDi t ted in the future if the proposed proj ect were not undertaken. 4.2 MIXED USE DEVELOPMEWT This alternative asslllles office develoiDent o~ the site's commercially zoned 1.67 acres partially fronting on Winchester Boulevard and low density residential developaent of the residentially zoned 1.75 acres. The COIIUIlerc1al portion of the project site could support an office developaent of approximately 30,000 square t'eet. Such a develoiDent would generate an average of 369 trip ends per day. Added to this would be an estimated seven low densi ty residential Un! ts which would generate an average of 10 trip ends per day for a total of Jl39 trip ends per day. This al terna ti ve would generate 51 percent of the traffic generated by the proposed project. SClIle residential traffic would probably enter and ex! t the project site by using Walnut Drive, which would increase traffic on that lIinor local street. Under the proposed project, no access would be available frClll Walnut Drive. The jobs/housing impact of the mixed use al ternative would be better than the proposed project; however, this alternative would result in increased san! tary sever demands and other public services needs. 4-1 '5. SIDtHFICART RNVIRORMRRT.AL EFFEC'l'S WHICH CARROT BE AVOIDED IF 'mE PROPOSAL IS IMPLEMENTED Section 3 addresses impacts that would result it the proposed project were implemented and recommends measures to mitigate these impacts. In all cases, the recOlllllended mitigation measures would minimize impacts to the level o~ 1ns1gnit1cance. Therefore, no signit1cant, unavoidable, adverse impacts are expected to occur as a resut t o~ approval ~ the proposed proj ect. 5-1 6. G RCJl TH INOOCING IMPACTS OF THE PROPOSED ACTION A project is generally considered to be growth inducing if it could foster economic or population growth, or the construction of additional housing, either directly or indirectly, in the surrounding envirollllent. Included in this are projects which would remove obstacles to population growth. Increases in the population may further tax existing communi ty service facilities, so consideration must be given to this impact. The characteristics of the proposed project which may encourage and facilitate other activities that could significantly affect the envirollllent, either individually or cumulatively, also must be discussed. It must not be assUllled that growth in any area is necessarily beneficial, detrimental, or or l1tUe Significance to the envirolDent. The proposed office and research and developaent project would be a new source of employment and economic activity in the City of Campbell. Short term employment would be generated in the construction industry. Upon completion, the proposed project would create approximately 189 new jobs at the site. It is reasonable to expect that some of the new jobs would be filled by persons who would be moving into the area, increasing the demand for housing. Still, some workers may already reside in the Campbell area within commuting distance. The proposed project would not r8love any obstacles to further population growth. The proposed project also would create employment in secondary _nutacturing business supply and service industries. The ongoing growth or manufacturing uses in Santa Clara County already has led to the substantial expansion of business support operations (e.g., building maintenance, temporary office and technical help, laboratory, factory and office equipaent and supplies, etc.). These services and trades are already available throughout the area and the proposed proj ect wuold represent a minor add! tion in demand for these operations. It is expected that the support businesses would be able to absorb this demand without the need for major expansion. 6-1 7 _ CUMnLATIVR IMPACTS The level of service aDalysis in Section 3.2, Circulation and parking, includes calculations of the CUIIlulative critical movements frQll approved project area developments (including the Campbell Business Park and the Bonnet School s1 te) and the cumulative impact at traffic fraa the existing, approved and proposed proj ects. The following cumulative impacts have been identified in this report: Increased peak hour and daily traffic vol1.1lles on local and regional roadways. Increased vehicle IIlles traveled with a comparable increase in air pollutants senerated. 7-1 8. EFFECTS NOT FOmID TO BE SmNIFICANT Based on the Initial Study prepared by the Ci ty o~ Campbell Planning Department (see Appendix A), discussions with the planning staff, and analysis conducted during preparation o~ the EIR, SClllle envirollllental issues were found to be not sign1~icant and, therefore, were determined not to require indepth analysis. These issues include the following: BIOT.my. The project site is located in an urbanized setting. No significant plant or animal habitats are known to be supported onsite. NOT~E. The primary source o~ noise in the vicini ty or the project site is vehicular traffic on nearby major streets. Project generated traf~ic would contribute to the ambient noise level in the project vicinity. This increase, however, would not be significant (less than one dBA) since the volume o~ project generated traffic would be _all, relative to the large volumes of trat~ic in the vicini ty not related to the project. Noise ~rCllll construction operations would have a short term 1mpact on adjacent residences. GEor.mY/SOTI. COMPACTION. No known faults are located beneath the project si tee The project area so11s are a resul t o~ the coalescence or alluvial ~ans which form the land surface or the Santa Clara Valley. Utility connections, foundation supports, and building design must comply with seismic requirements of the State Uniform Building Code. The s:1te contains unconsolidated soils excavated ~rCllll the adjacent perCOlation ponds. 'lbese soils will be hauled frCllll the s:1 te or compacted prior to s:1 te development. A soils study should be done on site prior to construction to determine soil characteristics on s:1 te and proper grading for the s:1 tee HYDRCJ.mY/FT.OOD RISr. Storm drainage and water quality issues are discussed in Section 3.4, Storm DrainagelWater Quality. The nearest water course to the proj ect s:1 te is Los Ga tos Creek, loca ted more than 2, 000 ~eet to the east. The project s:1te is not located in a 100 year flood zone. The s1 te would not be subject to ~lood1ng frca adjacent perCOlation ponds as the ponds are at a lower elevation than the s:1 tee In the event that heavy earthquake movement caused percolation pond water to flow up out or the basin, water flows into the s:1 te would be prevented due to the six ~oot (proposed) masonry wall surrounding the s:1 tee An QUAT. TTY. The project site is within a nonattaiment area ~or carbon monoxide (CO) and ozone (03). Project related emissions would represent a small percentage o~ the total for Santa Clara County, but would contribute to the cumulative levels. Measures to reduce vehicle trips generated by the proposed project also would reduce air pollutant contributions. Construction operations may generate dust and particulates due to the use of heavy, earthmoving equipment. Watering down areas of soil redistribution to prevent excesses o~ particulates is a common construction practice. ENERGY. No extraordinary amounts of electricity or natural gas are expected to be consumed by private tenants of the proposed office project. 8-1 .T~~/Rm~lVn. The proposed zoning amendment would eliminate the potential housing opportun1 ties on site, the equivalent of seven single family residences based on ensting low densi ty residential zOning. This would represent a cumulative 1Dlpact on housing supply in Campbell but is not considered significant. 8-2 Q. REFERENCES: OICANIZl'l'IOHSr POBLICl'l'IONS AWD PER~OWS COHsm.'l'ED Benbotten, James, Traftic Engineer, Town ot Los Gatos, telephone communication ( 1984 ) . Campbell, City of, Environmental AsMSl'llllent for C'..snnpbell Busi ne89 Park (1983). Campbell, Ci ty of, Land Use Man, City of Camnbell General Plan (1984). Campbell, City ot, Zoninl Man (1984). Highway Research Board, Ripay Canaci ty Manual (1965). ITE (Institute ot Transportation Engineers), Trin Generation Report (1979). ling, Don, Engineering Technician, City of Campbell Public Works Departaent, telephone cODUllunication (1984). Manley, ICei th, Assistant Civil Engineer, City ot Campbell, personal communica tion (1984). San Jose, City of, Comnuterized Intersection Canacity Model (1984). Santa Clara County Transit District, Route Information, telephone communication (1984). Scbmidtmeier, Holgar, Traftic Engineer, City of San Jose, telephone COllUlluni ca ti on (1984). Scott, Sandy, March Develolll1ent Corporation (applicant), personal communi ca ti on (1984). West, Russell, Engineer, CALTRAHS, telephone communication (1984). Wilson, Larry, Water Operations Super'lisor, Santa Clara Valley Water District, telephone communication (1984). 9-1 10. PREPARERS OF TRh~ REPORT This report was prepared D.r Wilson & Porter Engineering ot San Francisco, Calitornia and Earth Metrics Incorporated, Burlingaae, Calitornia. Wilson and Porter Engineering and Earth Metrics have no tinancial interest in the approval or disapproval ot the proposed project. The Wilson and Porter Engineering staft who participated in this work are: John Wilson, M. S., Registered Traftic Engineer, Principal in Charge Sillllll1e Graves, A. A. The Earth Metrics staft who participated in this work are: c. Michael Hogan, Ph. D., Principal in Charge Russell Leavitt, B. A., Project Manager Elizabeth Schmidt, M. A. Jeanne Mursch, B. A., Production Manager Caesar Jhanapin, Graphics 10-1 ". APPENDICES A. In! tial Study 11-1 A. Initial Study ENV I RONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT " . f ~ ...V.WON....TAL. CMEClCL.IST 'Ia ~ USCD ft 'W'MC CITY 0" CAIIP.CL.L '" IMICI... INITIAL 8TUDy r I . 1lA0CIIIII04.N) r L NAIIE OF PROPONENT: Mr. Dennis Kobza ADDRESS OF PROPONENT: 2483 Old Middlefield Rd. Mountainview. CA 94043 'l'EUPHONE: ( 415 ) 961-6103 -, DATE OF CHECKLIST SUBMITTED: AGENCY REOVIRING CHECKLIST: Apri 1 27. 1984 City of Campbell NAME OF PROPOSAL (IF APPLICABLE): Center ( ~ ~~ -~Z-) Wincheste~ Business II . ENV IIIQI\D4EHf AL I~C'TS -I (C~L.ANATIDNS 0.. Al.L D.I AND .....Yltr ANSWE"S AItE _QUIltED ON ATTACHCD SMEET) 1. EARTH. fiill the proposal result in: a. Vnstable .arth conditions or i.n C:Mnges i.n geologic sub6tructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, r:om~ction or overcoveri.ng of the soil? c:. Change in topography or ground surface reli.ef features? d. I'M destructi.on, c:overi.ng or IIIOdifi~ti.on of any unique geologic: or Jlhysic:al f.atures? Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off tl>> .1te? ClNnges in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or c:hanges in s1ltation, depos1ti.on or .rosion which ..y IICdiff/ tM c:hannel of a river or stream or the bed of the oc..n or any bay, inlet or J.ke? Exposure of people or property to geologic: hazards such as .arthquakes, JandsJides,; .udslldes, ground fa1Jur., or .imIlar hazards? e. . f. g. 11-2 !!! MA YItE ..... ..0 . . .. )( D D D ~ D D D X D D )( D D X a x a D ...: D J of , ~g.. ~. IIA~E "0 ... ..... .. 2. !!!. Ifill proposal result j,n: .. Substantial .j,r emissions or deterioration of lIIDbient air quality? D D )( b. f'he creation of objectionable odors? D D ~ ,. c. Alteration of .ir ~ve~nt, JftOisture or ~empera- ture, or any change in climate, either locally D D X .. or regionally? J. WATER. Will the proposal resul t in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, i-n either marine or fresh waters? C C 1- b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runQff? X c 0 c. Alterations to ~he course or flow of flood ". waters? C C X d. Change in the amount of surface water i-n any water body? C C .. e. Discharge into surface waters, or i-n any altera- tion of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? C C l( f. Alteration to the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? C C ~ g. Change i-n the quanti-ty of ground water., either through direct additi-ons or withdrawal., or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations ? D D X h. Substantial reduction in the AIJIOunt of water It otherwise available for public water supplies? c c i. Exposure of people or property to water related hazards .such as flooding or ~idal waves? D )( c 4. PlAN'/' UFE. "lll ~ proposal re.ult 112: '. .. Change in ~he diversitJl of specles or number of any species of plants (including tree., shrubs, grass, crops, mcroflora and aquati-c X plMts)? D D b. Reduction or the numbers or any unique, rare X or endangered .pecle. of pl.nu? D D c. Introc1uction Or new spedes of plants into an area, or 1n a barrier to the nozmal replerds1Dent )t of edS'tIng speci..? D D d. Reduction in acreage of anll agricultural crop? a D )( 11-3 2 of 6 pages 5. ANIMAL LIFE. liill th~ proposal zesult 1n: r a. CM.ng~ 1n the div~rs1.tlJ of .peci~s, or nuJJlbers of any species of ~i",.l. (birds, l~d ani_d. Jncluding reptiles, fish ed shellfish, benthic organisms, 1nsects or aUcrofauna)? b. Reduction of the numbers of any un.iqu~, rare or endangered species of eimals? c. Introduction of new species of anilftllls 1nto an area, or result 1n a barrier to the migration or Jll)v~ment of animals? d. Deteriorat1.on to e:dsting fish or wildlife habitat? 6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? - 7. LICHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? B. LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? 9. NATlJRAL RESOTJRCES. liill the proposal result in: a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? b. SUbstantial depletion of ~!/ nonrenewable natural rellOurce? 10. RISK OF UPSET. Does the proposal :involv~ a risk of an explo.ion or the relea.~ of Mzardous sub- stances (inClUding, but DOt 11mited to, 011, pesticides, chemicals or radiat10n) 1n the event of an accident or up..t c:onditl~? Jl. POPULATION. Will the propoAl .It.r the locat1On, distribution, densIty, or ,rowth rate of tM human population of e area? J2. ROUSING. "ill the proposal affect ex1.stIng hous1ng, or cr~ate a demand for additional housIng? 11-4 -..:. IIA~ ... ..... x a D D D D D D D D D x D D )( D D D D D D D D D D )( "0 .. x x. l( X D x D D x )II( x )(' a J of , pages JJ. 'l'RANSPOR'1'A'1'ION/CIRCrJIA'1'ION. tI.1JJ the proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular JIJOvement . r b. Effects on ex.1st.1ng park.1ng fac.11.1~.1es, or de~nd for new ~rking? c. SUbstantial im~ct upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterat.1ons to present patterns of c.1rculaUon or movement of people V2d/or goods? e. Alterat.1ons to waterborne, ra.11 or a.1r traff.1c? f. Increase in traffic hazards to JIJOtor veh.1cles, biCJIclists or pedestriV2s7 14. PlJBLIC SERVICES. fiill the proposal haw an effect upon, or resul t in a need for new or al tered governmental services in V2y of the following areas: a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools? d. Parles or other recreational facil.1ties? e. lIaintenance of public facilities, including roads? f. Other governmental servi ces? 15. ENERGY. fiill the proposal result in: a. Vse of substantial amounts of hel or energy? b. Subsuntial in=rease in demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energJJ" 16. U'l'IU7'IES. "ill the proposal result in a need for new systems, or .ubstantial alterations to._ the following utilities: a. JiIower or mtural ga." b. Communications s!lstems" c. "ater? d. Sewer or septic taMs" e. Storm water drainage" f. Solid wa.te and di.posal., o. 11-5 ~. ... )( ~ D a a D a D D D D M.".E ..... D a x D D D D D D ~ D D D D D D D D D D a D D a a D a a D D D NO .. D D D~/ )(. J< c )t ')( )( )( >' >( >( )( :x )( .".,. )( :K X )I( 4 of , lMges . ~. . IIA~E "0 ... ..... .. . ~. llAyeE ..0 , ... ..... .. . rON. liJ.ll tM proposal . a a X .ntial additional vehicular X D D h hazards? a a .)( parking facilities, or the ing? a )( D 'pen to the upon existing transportation Ie creation D D Dd!/' '0 public ,/X) D D rt patterns of clrcvletion LD--" e and/or goods? ,A; D )(. an impact rborne, rail or air traffic? D D X ,recreational D D X hazards to IJIOtor vehicles, uians? D ~ D )sal relult the proposal have an effect !ogi calor X !Jding? D D ed for new or altered n any of the fOllowing areas: D D )( ~o degrade D D )l( ~antially D )( Ufe species, D to drop below wational facilities? a D )t( Iliminate a ic facilities, e number or includJng rlgered plant D D ~ "ples of the .ervices? a D )( :)r prehistorf/? D D X to ac:lU..,e ..al result i.n: ong-tenn, amounts of ~el or enerr;y? )( ~.paC't on D D ~n a rela- .. in demand upon existing if.. while or require the development kJto ~e X mergf/? a D )( D a are Indiv- 'Oposal J"esul t In a need nsicferable? ~antial alterations to :x . .epar.E. r: a D .source )( IIfeet of ..? D a rvi.ronment :ems? D a ~ D D X D a )( effects , effects ats' D a X IndirectJJ1? D D X ,., D a X fl'OsaJ? D a ~ 11-6 S Of , pages .. ".., << -.... III. DISCUSSICIH or DNIM:lN4ENTAL EVAUaTIOf r I see attached discussion r ..... L -I IV. E1ET'ERNINATION A~TEJt REV'CWING THE tNV.IllONMENTAL 'N~OMlAT'ON .U8MITTED .V 'rNE A....LICANT. AND AtrTE" CO....LCT.NG THE I:NVIM>NMENTAL CHECKLI.T V.E .Y THE CITY 0,. ~.EL.'" IN MAKING Nt I:NVIIIONMENTAL. ..SES.IIDfT C I find the proposed preject COULD NO'1' have a signi.ficant. effect en the environment, .nd . NEGATIVE DEClARATION will be prepared. D I find that althcugh the propostJ4 project could hlw a significant effect on the environment, there will net be a significant effect in this case because the miti- gation ..asure. descrlbed on an .ttached sheet .Mve been added to the preject. A NEGATIVE D!'ClARA'1'ION tlIU. BE PREPARED. ~ Z find the proposed project _Y have a slgni.fl~At effect on the environment, .nd e ENVIRONIIEN'1'AL ZIIPAC'1' REPORT 1 s requ1red. MTE .. ~, 6i ~ ....AT.- :J ..:-~. l\r.l.y TI'ft.C ~~...:II:. POR ..w+-uK..~. \<~ I fLN.lM'tJ~ r~l 11-7 ~ of , JMges . ~ APPLICANf: Mr. Dennis' Kobza SITE ADDRESS: 3101 S. Winchester Blvd. FILE K>: ze 84-02 DISCUSSION OF ENVIJ{)~ENrAL EVALUATION: 1 (b) The construction of the proposed building may require the compaction or overcovering of the existing soil on this site. 3(b) COnstruction of the proposed building and related parking facilities will decrease the absorbtion rate and may increase surface ron-off. 3(i) The proposed project is adjacent to an existing percolation pond. This site may be subject to fl ooding in the event of an earthquake,-- and the resulting spillage from this percolation pond. 6) 7) 8) 12) 13(a) 13(b) 13(f) 18 The proposed project will increase existing noise levels in that the project site is currently vacant. Appropriate landscaping and buffers should minimize increased noise ley-~ls. Light and glare will result from the proposed Jaarking area lighting and building. ..-/' The project site is currently vacant. Development of this proposal will change the existing land use. The proposed building will provide additional office space increasing enp10yment opportunities and increasing the demand for housing. This proposal will generate adeli tional vehicular movement in this area. The proposed building indicates an office business center which requires 1 parking space for every 225 gross square feet of floor area of office use. The proposed project indicates the provision of parking at 1:250. The proposed proj ect may increase traffic hazards due to an increase in vehicular movement. The proposed two-story building may obstruct existing vistas and have an aesthetic ~act on neighboring properties. .;. 11-8 B. TRAFFIC STUDY \'!RAFFIe S1'ODY rol 181 PlOPOSID IUICH DI'IILOPMlll'r OPnCZ PlOlIC'r, 3101 saJm WDCUS'1'D BODLD AJU), c:.ums1LL Prapared. for: City of c.apbeU WUs011 & Porter Engineering July 1984 11-9 CHAPTER 1) 2) 3) 4) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Project Description .................. Existing Setting . . a) Local Access b) Regional Access . . . .. . . . . c) Transit. . . . . . . . . . d) Currently Proposed Roadway Improvements . . e) Intersection Levels of Service ...... . . . . . . . . Impacts .... . . . a) Trip Generation . . . b) Trip Distribution/Traffic Assignment c) Capacity Analysis . . . . d) Driveways/Site Access . e) Transit........ f) Pedestrian and Bicycle Access g) Parking........... . . . . . . . . . . . 5) Mitigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6) Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7) Appendices a) Levels of Service b) Traffic Counts i Page 1 1 1 1 7 7 7 8 8 8 10 10 18 18 18 19 19 20 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) Project Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proposed Site Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Average Daily Traffic Volumes . . . . . . . . . . . . Trip Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A.M. Peak Hour Project Related Traffic . . . . . . . . P.M. Peak Hour Project Related Traffic . . . . . . . . LIST OF TABLES 1) 2) 3) 4) Levels of Service Descriptions . . . . . . . . . . . . Trip Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A.M. Peak Hour Levels of Service . . . . . . . . . . . P.M. Peak Hour Levels of Service . . . . . . . . . . . ii Page 2 3 5 11 12 13 9 10 14 15 1) Introduction This report has been prepared to determine and analyze the traffic and transportation impacts that would accompany construction of an office building on Winchester Boulevard in the City of Campbell. The operating characteristics of the existing roadway network serving the proposed site are reviewed. Trips which would be generated by other approved but as yet uncompleted projects are forecasted and distributed to the roadway network. Trips which would be generated by the proposed project are forecasted and distributed to the roadway network. The roadway network operating characteristics are then re-evaluated under conditions which assume completion of currently approved projects alone, completion of the proposed project in conjunction with approved projects and, finally, traffic mitigation measures are suggested where needed. 2) Project Description The proposed project would consist of constructing 63,104 gross square feet of office and research and development space on the west side of Winchester Boulevard near Hacienda Avenue as shown in Figure 1. The building would be a two story structure situated onsite as shown in Figure 2 and would be accompanied by an at grade parking lot accommodating 252 vehicles adjacent to the west side of the building. Access to the parking facilities would be provided from Winchester Boulevard at two locations, one on each side of the building. Of the 252 proposed parking stalls, 185 would be standard size and 67 or 26.6 percent would be compact. 3) Existing Setting a) Local Access The proposed project site is located in the southern portion of the City of Campbell adjacent to Winchester Boulevard as shown in Figure 1. Access will be provided to Winchester Avenue as shown in Figure 2. The project site is linked to Highway 17 to the north via Winchester Boulevard and the San Tomas Expressway and to Highway 17 to the south via Winchester Boulevard and Lark Avenue. The project site is linked to the Almaden Area via Winchester Boulevard, San Tomas Expressway and Camden Avenue. Winchester Boulevard in conjunction with the San Tomas Expressway provides access to the west and access to the north is provided by Winchester Boulevard directly. -1- r.;;; ,_ .,~ ~1~""""" '--~'fI6II#1Y~1 .,..,.... ~. '- ' f I ;-....~: i .. '; ---:- c ~u. ~ . ~t.:'"JOS~' I:: 1= ~ \ -. _I i oc-' I '[ 0'''' , .' ':1 J - _ eOLLaOI ;.u \=.1 J r!.' _; _.:, : I. ~ ~ ; ,-,.;-,. ~ ~ "i '~i' .': ~=.r':~.;.;.;;.:iS:ill i "'. II i I i I ~ : ~r'I.- I ............ 0-1- J -,'5 I_Ill' ."'_,. _ ,. ' - 31 ~ '~I 'I. , ","1OotL II ' CJI;- ..' i ;~ ,I c ;, '!!!........ .. I ~ ,I I\~ \,..;'~,:~ !,., ,... I~ ,~, . I './ '::sr I -\P" L i I .. .~.,;:, ~'~ .n:. :;' ~~~......~.,/y. ~.., "'~ ...~_... \ , If=":;1 l"~~/. '~_~ \ 'ciii;;r" I ..'L ~" ;,...... ~(' ..-.; ..01 ,_.~ \"," ilK. w.. .,'.t'rfOIID ~ DRAWN BY DATE PROJECT LOCATION CHECKED BY Joe NA ME FIGURE NO. ~ G;:J u;: [7 \J [J==7 [5 WILSON & PORTER ENGINEERING t> 1 70 ZOE · SUITE 200 · SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94107 SCALE NTS 2 \ \\ \ \. \ \ \ ' -... \ \~" '. , \ \ \ \ \\ . c:i I ,~J 'ID ,.' .-- ( : I :i ~ i ~ ; J ~ I -.-----7 ..- --....- - NV"dVHO -,r- -.--.-.. " { DRAWN BY DATE PROPOSED SITE PLAN CHECKED BY JOB NAME FIGURE NO. C!:f] ~ ~ WILSON & PORTER ENGINEERING t> [7 \J [i==7 ~ 70 ZOE. SUITE 200. SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94107 SCALE 2 J Winchester Boulevard is a major north/south arterial in the Santa Clara Valley extending north from the proposed project site to Santa Clara and south from the proposed site to Los Gatos. The roadway is a two-way, four lane facility in the project vicinity with exclusive left turn lanes at major intersections. There is also a two-way left turn median lane between most intersections but not in front of the project site. Winchester Boulevard is fully improved with curbs and gutters along the majority of its length. However, the portion of Winchester Boulevard fronting the project site has not been fully improved, lacking curbs and gutters. The roadway currently experiences an average daily traffic volume (ADT) of approximately 20,300 vehicles (City of Campbell 1982/1983) in the project vicinity as shown in Figure 3. Camden Avenue is a major east/west facility linking the City of Santa Clara with the Almaden Area in conjunction with the San Tomas Expressway. Camden Avenue intersects State Highway 17 with an interchange approximately one half mile east of Winchester Boulevard. Camden Avenue is fully improved with three lanes in each direction with exclusive left turn lanes at major intersections. The intersection of Camden Avenue with the southbound Highway 17 interchange ramps is controlled with traffic signals. Camden Avenue currently experiences an average daily two-way traffic volume of approximately 63,000 vehicles directly east of Highway 17 (City of Campbell 1982/1983). The San Tomas Expressway is a six lane two-way facility linking the City of Santa Clara with the Almaden Area in conjunction with Camden Avenue. San Tomas effectively becomes Camden Avenue at Highway 17 as shown on Figure 1. The San Tomas Expressway is fully improved to expressway standards with access limited to major intersections at approximately one half mile intervals. San Tomas Expressway intersects Winchester Boulevard with a grade separated interchange as shown in Figure 1. Other roadways identified as having the potential to be utilized or affected by project related traffic are Sunnyoaks Avenue, Old Camden Avenue, Hacienda Avenue, Knowles Drive, Chapman Drive, Walnut Drive and Lark Avenue. Sunnyoaks Avenue is a minor two-way street which extends west from Winchester Avenue. It also extends east from Dell Avenue as shown in Figure 1 where it functions as part of the Winchester Boulevard/San Tomas Expressway intersection. Old Camden Avenue is a -4- Chapman Dr. SB 11053 NB 12908 WB 2138 EB 1252 Sunnyoaks Ave. ~ Q) C +=> H ;:l (,) WB 7791 EB 7608 SB 17715 NB 16931 WE 31232 EB 31949 . Q) > ~ c Q) "Cl @ (,) Q) > ~ m ~ t'- ro ~ 0 Q) Q) +=> +=> ;:l OM 0 ..c:: ~ :s: Q) +=> ro +=> tIJ PROJECT SITE WB 3388 EB 3075 Knowles Dr. SB 3927 NB 4031 SB 10652 NB 9632 SB NB WB 1686 EB 18'39 ~ o ~ f/J o .r:; CJ ~ ''"'1 ~ DRAWN BY JW AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES Source; City of Campbell (1982-1983) ~ G:J ~ WILSON & PORTER ENGINEERING t> [7 \J c:J==7 ~ 70 ZOE · SUITE 200 · SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94107 CHEC~ED BY .TW JOB NA ME FIGURE NO. 3 SCALE NTS 5 minor two-way roadway extending southeast from Winchester Boulevard through an industrial area. It intersects the westbound ramps on the San Tomas Expressway as shown in Figure l. The intersection of Old Camden Avenue and Winchester Boulevard is currently controlled with a yield sign on Old Camden. However, the intersection is to be signalized as part of a project at that intersection as described in Section 3-d. Hacienda Avenue is a two-way roadway extending east and west from Winchester Boulevard as shown on Figure l. West of Winchester Boulevard, Hacienda Avenue is fully improved to approximately 64 in some locations and is only partially improved with 30 feet of pavement at other locations. The roadway, where fully improved to 64 feet, will consist of two lanes in each direction with on street parking. East of Winchester Boulevard, Hacienda Avenue is fully improved with curbs and gutters and one lane in each direction. The intersection of Winchester Boulevard and Hacienda Avenue is controlled with signals and has exclusive left turn lanes on Winchester Boulevard. Hacienda Avenue currently experiences a two-way ADT of approximately 15,400 vehicles west of Winchester and 7,500 vehicles east of Winchester Boulevard (City of Campbell, 1982-1983). Knowles Drive is a two-way roadway extending east and west from Winchester Boulevard as shown in Figure 1. West of Winchester Boulevard, Knowles Drive is fully improved with curbs, gutters, sidewalks and one lane in each direction. East of Winchester Boulevard, Knowles Drive is fully improved with curbs, gutters, a sidewalk on the south side and two lanes in each direction. The intersection of Knowles Drive and Winchester Boulevard is controlled with signals, and there are exclusive left turn lanes on Winchester Boulevard. Knowles Avenue currently experiences a two-way ADT of approximately 2,500 vehicles east of Winchester Boulevard (City of Campbell, 1982-1983). Chapman Drive and Walnut Drive are minor two-way residential streets located adjacent to the project site as indicated in Figure 1. Both roadways are approximately 30 feet wide and have graded gravel shoulders. The intersection of Chapman Drive and Winchester Boulevard is controlled with a stop sign on Chapman Drive. Both Chapman Drive and Walnut Drive currently experience very limited traffic volumes. Lark Avenue is a major east-west roadway extending east from Winchester Boulevard to South Bascom Avenue in the Town of Los Gatos. Lark Avenue intersects Highway 17 with a grade-separated interchange as -6- indicated in Figure 1. The intersection of Lark Avenue and Winchester Boulevard is controlled with signals. b) Regional Access Regional access to the project vicinity is provided by Highway 17. Highway 17 is a major facility which extends northeast from the project vicinity to Oakland along the easterly edge of the Bay. It extends southwesterly from the proposed project site through the Town of Los Gatos to the City of Santa Cruz. Highway 17 is fully improved to freeway status in the project vicinity and intersects both the San Tomas Expressway and Lark Avenue with grade-separated interchanges as shown in Figure 1. c) Transit Transit in the project vicinity is currently provided by the Santa Clara County Transit District with Routes 38 and 60. Route 38 extends between the Monterey Center in San Jose and the Los Gatos/Saratoga Community Hospital in Los Gatos and utilizes a portion of Hacienda Avenue in the project vicinity. Route 38 operates on one-half hour headways during both the peak and off-peak periods. Route 60 extends between Great America and the Town of Los Gatos. In the project vicinity, Route 60 travels west on Hacienda Avenue towards the Los Gatos/Saratoga Community Hospital returning eastbound on Knowles Avenue to Winchester Boulevard and then traveling south on Winchester to Los Gatos. Route 60 operates on 15 minute headways during peak periods and 30 minute headways during off-peak periods. d) Proposed Roadway Improvements There are currently a number of roadway improvements proposed in the project area as part of other, already approved projects. The intersections of Winchester Boulevard with Old Camden Avenue and Sunnyoaks Avenue are to be signalized as part of the approved Research and Development project at the intersection of Old Camden Avenue and Winchester Boulevard. An exclusive left turn lane will be added to westbound Hacienda Avenue at Winchester Boulevard as part of the Zilog project. The intersection of Oka Road east of Winchester Boulevard in -7- the Town of Los Gatos is to be signalized as par~ of an approved projec~ within Los Gaeos, and Sanca Clara County is in the process of adding a High Occupancy Vehicle Lane (ROV) to the San Tomas Expressway. In this analysis, all of the above improvements are assumed completed when this project is completed except for the ROV lane on the San Tomas Expressway. e) Intersection Levels of Service The operating characteristics of an intersection can be described in the standardized format of level of service (LOS). The LOS is a qualitative description of an intersection's quality of operation based on delay and maneuverability. LOS can range from A, representing free flow conditions. to F. meaning jammed conditions. In this report. both the City of San Jose's and the Transportation Research Board's methodologies for calculating LOS based upon the volume to capacity ratio (v/c) of critical movements were employed to analyze the following signalized intersections under various conditions. Both methodologies were used to allow review of this report by the City of Jose which relies exclusively on their methodology. the City of Campbell which has previously used both. and the Town of Los Gatos which relies on the Transportation Research Board's methodology. The possible levels of service together with their respective descriptions are shown in Table 1. There were six major. signalized or soon to be signalized intersections which were identified as having the potential to be significantly impacted by the proposed project. The current A.M. and P.M. peak hour LOS of these intersections are presented in Tables 3 and 4. Review of these tables show the izu:arsection of Camden Avenue southbound State Route 17 ramps is currently operating at capacity or LOS I ciun.ng the evening peak hour as calculated using the City of San Jo.e' S methodology. The remaining intersections all operate at a LOS D or better during the peak hours. 3) Imoacts a) Trip Generation The project as currently proposed would consist of 63.104 gross square feet of office space. Using the Institute of Transportation -8- LEVEL OF SERVICE A B C D E F TABLE 1 Levels of Service Descriptions IBTERPRETATION Unoongested oPerations, no vehiole required to wait longer than one oyole, all turns oan be mad e easily. Slightly more traffio than LOS A, but interseotion remains unoongested and no one waits through more than one red light to pass through. Light oongestion with oooasional baokups on the critical approaches and a minor number of vehioles may have to wait through more than one red cyole. Signifioant oongestion on the oritioal approaohes, with vehioles waiting through more than one red light to pass through the intersection. The interseotion, however, remains funotional and no excessive baokups oocur. Severe oongestion on all critioal approaches with long backups and substantial delays during short periods of time. Blookage of the intersection may ooour if traffic signal does not provide for proteoted turning movements. Baokups .ay block other intersections upstream of the oritioal approaohes. Total breakdown of the interseotion with stop and go operation, excessive baokups, and blookage of the intersection and other upstream interseotions. VOLUME/ CAPACITY RATIO less than .599 .600 - .699 .700 -.799 .800 -.899 .900 -.999 1.0 and greater JOTES: 1. The City of San Jose's Level of Servioe Polioy requires all interseotions to operate at a LOS of -D- or better. A traffic .ovement Dr approaoh is oritioal if it is part of, or affeots the flow of, the traffio .oving in the peak direotion. Souroe: City of San Jose Traffio Operations Division, 1984. 9 Engineers trip generation factors, it is estimated that the project would generate approximately 776 one way trips per day as shown on Table 2. Table 2 also shows projected A.M. and P.M. peak hour trips which would be generated by the proposed project. Table 2 Trip Generation Average Daily Trips Factor(l) 12.3/l000 GSF(2) A.M. Peak Hour Inbound Outbound 1.86/1000 GSF .35/1000 GSF ~e Way Trips 776 117 22 17 86 P.M. Peak Hour Inbound Outbound .27/1000 GSF 1.36/l000 GSF (1) Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1979 (2) GSF = Gross Square Feet. b) Trip Distribution The forecast trips which would be generated by the proposed project were distributed to the surrounding network as shown in Figure 4. This distribution was obtained from City of Campbell staff (Manley, 1984) and is based upon existing trip making patterns adjusted to local roadway conditions. The distribution assumes 35 percent of the project related trips would be to and from the north, 17 percent to and from the west, 33 percent to and from the south and 15 percent to and from the Alamden area. The A.M. and P.M. peak hour assignments of project related trips to the surrounding roadway network are shown in Figure 5 and 6 respectively. c) Capacity Analysis The impact of the proposed project on the surrounding roadway network was streets identified and evaluated using a level of service analysis (LOS) which is a standardized method of evaluating an intersection's operating characteristics. This evaluation of operating characteristics is done by relating traffic volumes, existing or -10- Sunnyoaks Ave. 2% Hacienda Ave. PROJECT SITE Chapman Dr. Knowles Dr. t.., Q) ~ rJ} Q) .J:; o r:: ....., ~ La.J:-k 1i tre 18% ~ DRAWN BY CHECKED BY TRIP DISTRIBUTION JOB NA ME ~ [;;:j ~ [7 \J [J:::7 ~ WILSON & PORTER ENGINEERING C> 70 ZOE · SUITE 200 · SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94107 SCALE 11 gt H Q) C +:> ~ ::s C,) . 15 \ \ 0) ~ ~ c 0) "C @ C,) 0) ~ ~ ~t CI.l ~ C"- cd ~ 0 0) 0) ~ ~ ::s .,-l 0 ..c: p:: 3: 0) ~ cd ~ if.l JW <TW NTS FIGURE NO. 4 18~ .san '1'O/11a S e)( ~ . 18___.. 3 3 +-- Sunnyoaks Ave. 1 ~ Hacienda Ave. PROJECT SITE Chapman Dr. Knowles Dr. 23 ~ 15 ~ Q) c .j.;l s... ::s 0 18 - 1~ . Q) > ~ c Q) "0 @ 0 1\ 16 Q) > ~ OJ ~ C"- eO ~ 0 Q) Q) .j.;l .j.;l ::s .~ 0 ..c 0::: ~ Q) ~ cO .j.;l tIJ ~ Q) ~ rtJ Q) ~ CJ ~ '1'0{ ~ TOTAL A.M. PEAK HOUR TRIPS: Inbound 117 Outbound 22 DRAWN BY A.M. PEAK HOUR PROJECT RELATED TRAFFIC CHECKED BY JOB NA ME ~~~ [7 \J ["J=7 ~ WILSON & PORTER ENGINEERING t> 70 ZOE . SUITE 200 · SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94107 SCALE 12 JW 84 ,TW FIGURE NO. 5 NTS 3~ 3+ 117 San. To,.., ''''as e.. ~ ~. 2 ____ 13 13 .--- ~ Q) s::: +.:l ~ ::s o 2 Sunnyoaks Ave. - 2 ...- Q) > <C s::: Q) '0 a u 4 I t 1 Q) > <C [J) ..!I:: c-- ttl ~ 0 Q) Q) +.:l +.:l ::s .r-! 0 ..c IX: :3: Q) ~ ttl ~ tr.2 Hacienda Ave. PROJECT SITE Chapman Dr. Knowles Dr. TOTAL P.M. PEAK HOUR TRIPS: Inbound 17 Outbound 86 DRAWN BY JW P.M. PEAK HOUR PROJECT RELATED TRAFFIC CHECKED BY .TW Joe NA ME FIGURE NO. ~G:J~ [7 \.J [f==7 ~ WILSON & PORTER ENGINEERING C> 70 ZOE · SUITE 200 · SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94107 6 SCALE NTS 13 III Ql Ql III l-l ::: CO Ql 0 en Ql ,::: ~ 0 l-l ~ ~,..J ON 0 CO 0 :::.... ~ III bO ~ ~N 401 Ql ~ 401 III ~ Ql 0 l-l CO CO ~U a ~ CO l-l C) ::c..... ~ 4oI..-l 4J ..... > ..-l 401 ~ ::: ~ 0 CO C) ~~ > l-l l-l C) ~'f'l GIN cu cu u .,....,- - III a-e ,::: 4J 0 N CIS a-e a-e ~ ~ a-e 0'\ 4J C) ~ l-l = - Ql C"'\ 0 .... 00 0\ \,C) Ql.Q Q,CO l-l . Ql .,.., ,::: iN! C) 0 ...-4 ...-4 N 0 0 ~ 0." _ 4J c: CIS l-l Ql ...-4 t-t ..-l Q,= Ql ~ ~ = l-l C) C:4oI Ql 0 ..-l Ql Ql ,::: a CO ,:::." ~ C) ~ ~ ...., III ~.Q oen 0 ~ ell ::: + l-l0 << << <I:Q << <~ U~ ~ = co Ql ~,..J CO: C) a bO ." C)~ ~ ~ ::: + Ql ~: 4oI..-l ~ III 401 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~~ = > Ill'" = CO ClO Ql ~.. U .... 11"I 00 -.D 11"I Ql ClO ~..-l C) >< Q, ..... 00 0\ N~ NN NII"I 00\0 ...-4~ a ~ >. III CO ~ ~ Q,> C"'\ <""l 11"I11"I 11"I I,Q 11"I11"I 11"I00 ,.... 00 ::l en." C) > < ..-l CO 1Il~ l-l 0 III Ql ~4J Ql > ~ l-l ~ en ..-l ~ l-l Ql ~ CO C) C) 401 ,::: C) CIS 0 ~ CO III Q,Ql Q,~ a,::: III III S ~4J ..-l ." ~ ~ en Ql .. en 0 = III > Q,O << << <I:Q << <~ UCl Ql =,..J CO Ql C"'\ Ql ~~ a CO III ~ - ~ Ql Ql CIS ~ 0 ..-l ..-l'::: III Ql ,..J l-l + 00 0 ..-lol-l 0 l-l ~ ~ _0\ > Ql ..., C) 0 C"'\ ~ -.D C"'\ ...-4 .Q Ql = E-4 ::t: oI-IU 00 0'\ N~ N...-4 ...-4~ oo~ O~ 00 - ..-l Q,l-l C:~ III ..... C"'\ C"'\ 11"I11"I 11"I \0 11"I 11'\ 11"I00 ,.... 00 0\ CO a Ql CO ~ ~> ...-4N C) CO,::: en C) CO >< -.... ~ U ~ ~ Ql ~ N 01-1 401 401 ~ ~ ~ 401 III 0401 bOl-l l-l 0 Ql CIS ~ o CO C) III >'l-l ..-l..-l >.CO 4J0I-I o ~ Ql 01-1 C) ~ ." C) l-l ~ UoI-I o l-l Ql U = C) en ,:::~ ,::: ~ ::: Ql bOO << << << << C"'\ C"'\ ~II"I ...:r 11"I ~ 11'\ 11'\00 -.D ,.... CO > Ql'::: c: -: ~ ..-l'::: = 01-1 ~N ..-l ~ 0 ..-l ~ 4-1 l-l CO o ,., CO 4-1 Ql Ql l-l 0 = ..-l CO C) Ql ,., ." 0 bO CO Ql ~ ." 0 ~ U III 01-1 a III "f III Ql ~ :.0 <: Ql ~ ,., < >. ~ III ." III C) ,Q : 4J ~ -0 N N N N N N 0 = . CO ...-4'::: ...,.... ""...-4 ...,.... ..., .... ..., .... ..., ...-4 ..., 0 = . Ql III ~ c: -01-1 en N enN enN en N en N en N ~ ~ 01-1 a 01-1 0 >. 0 Ql = 01-1 C) ~ C) ..-l ." ~ ::c CO C',) Ql CO..-l CO Ql CO 01-1 en 01-1 III Q,O Q,.Q Ql C) ,., ell 0 a > a ,., Ql 4-1 0 Ql~ t-t t-ten..-l III 0 Q, ,., 01-1 ..-l . 0 ell ,., - - III C) cu 01-1 cu ~ 4J~ Ql 11"I 11"I ~= = ,., = C) ClO = en 4J - - 01-1 ell ~ ell ~ 0 I'll CO ~ = ~ ,., >. 0 01-1..-1 C) t-t c: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ UE-4 01-101-1 ~ ~ 0 ~ en en 0 ,.... III =~ 401 ,.,." 401 Ql 0 III ~ l-l = l-l ,., l-l ,., ...-4 Q, II II Ql C) ~ CJ 0 ~ CJ ..-l Ql 01-1 Ql Ql Ql en Ql Ql Ql a o ell = .c: = ::l a CJ 01-1'" 0I-I~ 01-1 CO 01-1 01-1 ~ ~~ N l-l Q, bOQlol-l ClO." Ql ::l Ql III S II) I'll Ill." en III III ...,- Ql CO ~.c: Ql ~Ql'::: III II) Ql I'll Ql 0 Ql ::: Ql Ql Ql :::::t:4oI enN ~ CJ en 01-1 a en,.,oI-I III l-l ':::U .c: >. ,.. Ql ,::: '""" ,::: Ql 4-1 < Ql CJ 0 c:: U~ 0 ~ CJ~ ." .0 01-1 C:." c:: c:: c:: CJ = 0 c: ,., SI:Q - - - - - c:: ~'""" ~ ::l ~ ell ~ c: ~ CO CO . ,.... .... N C"'\ ...:r 11"I t-l ~O 3en 3::t: 3::':: 3,..J uen...-4 ; - - - - - -14- en Ql Ql al $-I ~ (13 Ql 0 en Ql ,.c:: ..... 0 ,.. ~ ~....:l UN U ell 0 ~...... ..... en 00 ~ .....N ~ Ql ..... ~ en ~ Ql U $-I ell (13 ..... U 6 ..... ell ,.. U ::E:- :l ~..... ~ -~ ..... ~ :l ~ :3 0 (13 U ~ .,-1 ? ,.. ,.. U ~..... Ql~ Ql Ql U ..., ...... ....... CIl ~ ..c: ~ 0 N ell ~ ~ ~ tN! ~ M ~ U :>.. ,.. ~ '-' Ql 0"1 \0 0 M 0"1 \0 Ql..o ~(13 $-I Ql .,..., ..c: ~ U 0 0 M ...... 0 0 ~ 0"0 ....... ~ ~ ell ,.. Ql ...... H ..... ~~ Ql :l ..... ~ ,.. U ~~ Ql 0 ..... Ql Ql i 6 (13 ..c:"O U ~ :>.. ....., en ~..o 0Cf) 0 ~ ell ~ + $-10 << !Xl !Xl UU O:.J 00 ~~ ~ ~ ell Ql ~....:l ell: U 6 00 "0 UO ..... :l ~ + Ql .....: ~ ..... ..... CIl ~ ..... 0 ~ :l .....~ ~ ? CIl"O ~ (13 00 .....- U LJ"'l \0 0"1 \0 \0 \0 Ql 00 ..... ..... ~ ~- ......M ......~ ......00 M ...... 0...... LJ"'lN S ..... :>.. CIl ell ~ ~~ LJ"'l LJ"'l \0 \0 ;-... r--. 00 0"1 0000 ON :l al"O U ..... (13 CIl ..... ...... ...... 0 CIl Ql ..... ~ ? ..... $-I ..... ..... ~ $-I Ql ~ ;\1 U U ,.c:: U ell ~ III CIl ~Ql ~..... 6..c: al S .....~ "0 ..... ..... en - en 0 ~ CIl ~O << !Xl !Xl UU ~~ U~ ~~ Ql ~....:l III Ql ~ ~....:l 6 ell CIl ....... :l Ql Ql ell ~ 0 ..... .......c: en aJ ...J + 00 0 .....~ 0 ,.. !Xl ....... 0"1 ? Ql ., U < N 0"1 0"1 0"1 M...... ..0 Ql ~ E-t ~U ......M ......M 0LJ"'l NO 0"1...... ~...... 00 '-' ..... ~$-I ~ ..... CIl_ LJ"'l LJ"'l \0 \0 r--. 1'0 00 0"1 r--. 00 ON 0"1 Cll S Ql ell ..... ~ ......N U (13..c: en U ~ ...... ...... '-' ...... ..... U ~ ..... ~ N ~ ~~ :>.. ..... ~ CIl O~ 00,.. $-I 0 Ql ell 0 ell U al :>"$-1 .......... :>.. III ~~ 0 :l Ql ~ U ..... "0 U $-I ..... U~ 0 $-I Ql U ~ U en ..c:..... ..c: ..... ~ Ql bOO << <!Xl !XlU U~ UU ~~ ~U ~ ~ .........., ~....:l Ql .....~ ..c: 0 ..... S CIl ..c:LJ"'l ~ $-I ~ "0 Ql ~ ..... ~ CIl ~ $-I 6 ..... ...... ~ ..... 0 III :l ~ ~ "0 XU r--. r--. \0 ...... ~ LJ"'l ..... 0 ..... ~ "0 ..... : CIl ~- LJ"'l\O OON \ON 0"1 \0 \0 r--. ...... \0 ~ !Xl 0 "0 ell Ql ~ N ~ ~~ LJ"'l \0 \0 1'0 r--. 00 r--. r--. 0"10 III ? Ql..c: ~ .......: ..... ..... ..c: ~ ~ .....N ..... ...... :l u ..... ..... ~ ,.. III U ,.. ell ~ CIl <ll $-I 0 ~ ..... ell U <ll ,.. "0 0 00 (13 Ql ..... "0 0 ..... U en ~ 6 CIl ..~ CIl CIl ..... al <: CIl ~ ,.. < :>.. i::l CIl "0 CIl U ..0 ~ ..... .......0 N N N N N N 0 ~ . III ......,.c:: ., ...... .,...... .,...... .,...... .,...... .,...... ., 0 ~ . Ql CIl ~ ~ '-' ~ en N en N enN enN en N en N ..... ..... ~ S ~ 0 :>.. 0 CIl ~ ~ u ;l u ..... "0 ..... X III III Ql Ill..... III <ll (13 ~ Cf)~ al ~o ~..o Ql u ,.. ell 0 S ? 6 ,.. <ll ~ 0 Ql ..... H Hen..... CIl 0 ~ ,.. ~ ..... . 0 (13 ,.. ....... ....... i al U III ~ ell :>.. ~ ....:l <ll LJ"'l LJ"'l :>..~ ~ $-I !::l u 00 ~ CIl ~ '-' '-' i ~ (13 ..... Cll ..... 0 Cll (13 ..... ~ ..... ,.. :>.. U~..... U H ~ <<:l <<:l <<:l <<:l <<:l UE-t ~ ~ .......... 0 ..... CIl en 0 r--. al !::l ..... ~ $-1"0 ~ C) 0 al ..... $-I ~ $-I $-I $-I $-I <<:l ;!I II II Ql U ..... U 0 ..... U ..... <ll ~ CIl CIl CIl CIl Ql CIl CIl U (13 ~ ..c: !::l :l S U ~"O ~~ ~ ell ~ ~ N ,.. ~ ooCll~ 00"0 CIl ;l Ql CIl S CIl (13 CIl"O CIl CIl al .,...... <ll III .....,.c::CIl ..... CIl ..c: en CIl <ll (13 <ll 0 Ql ~ <ll CIl CIl !::l::=~ enN ~ U en~ 6 en ,.. ~ al $-I ..c:U ..c: :>.. ..c: CIl ..c: r-1 ..c: Ql ~I < CIl U U ~ u..... u ~ U~ "0 '0 ~ ~"O ~ ~ ~ u ~ 0 ~ ,.. 6 !Xl ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ~ .......... ..... :l ..... ell ..... !::l ..... III ell . 1'0 I ...... N M ~ LJ"'l H :30 :3 en :3::= :3~ :3....:l Uen......, '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' -15- projected to the roadway or intersection capacity in the form of a critical volume to capacity rate (vie). The increase in critical volumes is what is actually used to identify significant impacts to intersections within the Cities of Campbell and San Jose. City of Campbell staff identified seven locations which had the potential to be impacted by the proposed project. Six of these are signalized intersections which are listed in Tables 3 and 4 together with their projected LOS assuming several scenarios. The proposed project is evaluated for both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours with regard to conditions assuming completion of other approved projects. The other approved projects include the Campbell Business Park, a research and development project at 743 and 749 Camden Avenue in Campbell. an office development on Lark Avenue in the Town of Los Gatos. improvements to the Jewish Center on Lark Avenue near Highway 17 in the Town of Los Gatos and other developments in the City of San Jose. including the development of the Bonnet School site. The existing LOS of the intersections are also included within the Tables. Definitions of LOS are provided in Table 1. Of the six intersections listed in Tables 2 and 3. five are within the city limits of Campbell and one within the boundaries of Los Gatos. Th the City of Campbell has established criteria for evaluating changes in LOS and determining when impacts are significant. Tables 3 and 4 show the City's criteria and intersections which would be significantly impacted by the proposed project based upon this criteria. Review of Table 3 shows no intersections would be significantly impacted by the proposed project during the A.M. peak hour. when evaluated with regard to City of Campbell criteria. The intersection of Winchester Boulevard with Old Camden Avenue. Sunnyoaks Avenue. Hacienda Avenue and Knowles Drive all operate at LOS A or B currently and are projected to continue to do so when other approved projects are completed and when the proposed project is completed. The intersection of Camden Avenue and the southbound Highway 17 ramps would not realize a significant increase in traffic from the proposed project nor would the intersection of Winchester Boulevard and Lark Avenue when evaluated by City of Campbell standards. (An increase in critical volumes must be greater than 1.5 percent to be significant). -16- Review of Table 4 shows no intersection would be significantly impacted by the proposed project during the P.M. peak hour. The intersection of ~{inchester Boulevard with Hacienda Avenue, Old Camden Avenue and Sunnyoaks Avenue all currently operate at a LOS C or better and are projected to continue to do so when other already approved projects are completed and when the proposed project is completed. The intersection of Camden Avenue and the southbound Highway 17 ramps is projected to operate at LOS F when other already approved projects are completed and when the proposed project is completed. However, the intersection would not realize a significant increase in traffic volumes (less than 1.5 percent) as a result of the proposed project and so would not be impacted significantly. Other locations identified by City of Campbell staff as having the potential to be impacted by the proposed project include Chapman Drive, Walnut Drive, the grade-separated intersection of Winchester Boulevard and the San Tomas Expressway and access to the project site. Chapman Drive and Walnut Drive are minor streets adjacent to the project site and extending through a residential area. They currently experience very limited traffic volumes, and it is anticipated that completion of the proposed project would not increase existing traffic volumes on these streets. No direct access to these streets is proposed and almost all project related trips will be oriented toward other areas and as a result use the major arterials as indicated in Figure 4. Review of Figure 5 shows the proposed project would add approximately 47 vehicles to the westbound San Tomas Expressway offramp to southbound Winchester Boulevard during the morning peak hour. This is a free running ramp without traffic control and should not be significantly impacted by the project. The proposed project would have a negligable impact on the remaining San Tomas Expressway ramps at Winchester Boulevard during the A.M. peak hour. During the evening peak hour, the proposed project would add approximately 34 vehicles to the eastbound onramp from northbound Winchester Boulevard as indicated in Figure 6. The ramp itself currently experiences a limited amount of traffic during the P.M. peak hour (241 vehicles, 1984). However, traffic eastbound on the San Tomas Expressway does back up to the merge point of this ramp from the intersection of the -17- San Tomas Expressway/Camden Avenue intersection with Highway 17 forcing a wait to merge on to eastbound San Tomas Expressway. The proposed project would increase current traffic volume by approximately 14 percent to 275 vehicles during the PM peak hour. Completion of the proposed project would have a negligable impact on the remaining San Tomas Expressway at Winchester Boulevard during the P.M. peak hour. d) Driveways/Site Access The project as currently proposed would have access to Winchester Boulevard at two points, one on the northerly and the other on the southerly edge of the building. As currently proposed, these would be 25 feet wide driveways extending west into the proposed parking area as shown in Figure 2. Winchester Boulevard in front of the project site has not been fully improved yet. When fully improved it would include two travel lanes in each direction and a two way left turn lane in the center. When these improvements, particularly the two way left turn lane, are completed, access to the site will occur safely and efficiently. A left turn lane will be present to provide safe left turns into the project site from northbound Winchester Boulevard and a safe storage area will be provided in the center of Winchester Boulevard for northbound vehicles turning left out of the project and waiting to merge with northbound traffic on Winchester Boulevard. If Winchester Boulevard is not improved, there will be the potential for rear-end collisions due to the fact that northbound vehicles on Winchester Boulevard waiting to turn left into the site will be forced to stop in a through lane. e) Transit. It is expected that the proposed project would have a very minimal impact on local transit in the project vicinity. Experience has shown that most office commuters in the Santa Clara Valley rely upon the private automobile for transportation almost exclusively. f) Pedestrian and Bicycle Access. The proposed project should not have a significant impact on pedestrian or bicycle access in the area. Currently there are limited pedestrian facilities and pedestrian traffic in the area which should not -18- be affected by construction of the proposed project. It is anticipated that almost all project related traffic would remain on major streets, particularly Winchester Boulevard in the project vicinity, and not utilize or impact pedestrian or bicycle traffic on minor residential streets in the project area. Crosswalks are currently provided for pedestrians at intersections along Winchester Boulevard and traffic traffic generated by the proposed project would not adversely impact the operation of these facilities. There are not any exclusive bicycle facilities on Winchester Boulevard and a potential for bicycle/auto conflicts could be present at the driveways into the project site. However, these would not be any more severe than those already present at all other driveways along Winchester Boulevard. Fully improving Winchester Boulevard in front of the project site with a ewo-way left turn lane and widening the outer travel lane on the west side would further reduce the potential for conflicts and probably improve upon existing safety levels. g) Parking. The project, as currently proposed, would include a total of 252 parking stalls. Of these, 67 or 26.6 percent would be compact size stalls and 185 would be full size stalls. This equates to one stall for every 250 square feet of office space. This is not in conformance with the City of Campbell's ordinance which requires the provision of one stall for every 225 square feet of office space. However, it is in conformance with the City's requirement for Research and Development space. Mitigation The following measures are suggested to mitigate the adverse traffic related impacts which would be associated with the proposed project. 1) Improve the west side of Winchester Boulevard in front of the project site to full standards including provision of a two-way left turn lane. -19- 2) Provide preferential parking or other incentives to encourage car and vanpooling. 3) Promote the use of staggered work hours or flex time to the degree possible. -20- Bibliography 1) Highway Research Board. Highway Capacity Manual. 1965. 2) City of San Jose. Computerized Intersection Capacity Model. 1984. 3) Hanley. Keith. Assistant Civil Engineer. City of CaDq)bell. personal communication. 1984. 4) Schmidtmeir. Holgar. Traffic Engineer. City of San Jose. telephone communication. 1984. 5) City of Campbell. Environmental Assessment for Campbell Business !!!!,. 1983. 6) Santa Clara County Transit District, loute Information, telephone communication, 1984. 7) West, Russell, Engineer CALTRANS, telephone communication, 1984. 8) Institute of Transportation Engineers, Informational Report on Trip Generation, 1979. 9) Benhotten, James, Traffic Engineer, Town of Los Gatos, telephone communication, 1984. . ' 21 Appendix A LEVELS OF SERVICE ,.,-.lPUT LOCATION: WINCHESTER I , DIST. (PLAN. AREA): ( JUNT DATE: 6/7/84 F'EAK HOUF:: AM ;1GNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. i ~:OWTH FACTOF: % : 0 LEG LANE PATTERN L F: LSTSFm 111000 100010 002010 000000 LEFT , ;! 534 .- c. 141 3 () IJ (> r" JTPUT I ::G # LANES CRIT. MOVE L R LSTSF:O '! -..) 111000 E 1 100000 3 ...., 002000 L II) 0 000000 . JTALS ,~ ~~ LARI< LOS GATOS DATE: 7/11/84 INIT.: Jt.>J AN~1L . AIWiL. EXIST G NIS 0 E/t.>j (> CYCLE LENGTH: 90 Y+R 6 ":!' '-' LANE COUNTS THRU RIGHT 314 0 0 695 878 259 0 0 I NBOUt'm 848 836 1137 o OUTBOUND 1573 793 4c::-C' -.!,J ADDED TRIPS o o o o o o o o o o o o o C. VOL. T. CAP. GIC ADJ./ ADJ. LANE G/C C. CAP. 848 4888 . 173 . 198 .371 1813 141 1675 .084 .066 . 15 251 878 3560 .247 . 132 .379 1349 0 0 (> 0 0 0 LOST TIME = . 1 1867 .604 3413 1.000 .604 = .396 / 6 = 66 Xl (HHI'-3 I Ie = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .547 LEVEL OF SERVICE = A _ :-.lPUT LOCATION: WINCHESTER & LARK . DIST. (PLAN. AREA): LOS GATOS ]UNT DATE: 6/7/84 PEAI< HOUR: AM cIGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. ROWTH FACTOR % : 4 LEG LANE PATTERN LANE COUNTS L R LSTSRO LEFT N 111000 573 E 100010 153 S 002010 0 ~ 000000 0 nUTPUT :::G # LANES CRIT. MOVE L R LSTSRO \I - 111000 E 1 100000 3 2 002000 W 0 000000 DTALS 6 ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXIST+APP'D G Y+R N/S 0 6 E/~oJ 0 3 CYCLE LENGTH: 90 THRU RIGHT INBOUND OUTBOUND 328 0 901 1655 0 --c:- 888 861 I.:':...J 920 288 1208 481 0 0 0 () ADDED TRIPS 18 1 0 6 0 12 19 (I o 7 o o C. VOL. T. CAP. ADJ./ ADJ. LAI'.IE G/C C. CAP. G/C 901 4887 . 184 . 184 .368 1798 153 1675 .091 .061 . 152 255 920 3560 .258 . 1?? .38 1353 ~~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOST TIME = . 1 1974 . c.:':,.:':. 3406 1 .000 .633 - .367 6 = 61 Xl0**-3 IC = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .58 LEVEL OF SERVICE = A J.1\lPUT LOCATION: WINCHESTER & LARK ( DIST. (PLAN. AREA): LOS GATOS LJUNT DATE: 6/7/84 PEAK HOUR: AM ~ : GNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. ( mWTH FACTOR I. : 0 LEG LANE PATTERN L R LSTSRO LEFT ~ 111000 577 E 100010 153 3 002010 0 000000 0 r'JTPUT i ::G # LANES CRIT. MOVE L R LSTSRO ~ - 111000 E 1 100000 3 2 002000 '1J (I 000000 JTALS 6 LANE COUNTS THRU F: I GHT 330 0 (> 755 932 288 0 0 ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXIST+APP'D+PROJ G Y+F: NIS 0 6 E/W 0 _ CYCLE LENGTH: 90 ADDED TRIPS 420 (> o o OUTBOUND 1687 865 483 INBOUND 907 908 1220 o 0 20 1'"" 0 ..:.. 0 0 o C. VOL. T. CAP. ADJ./ ADJ. LANE G/C C. CAP. GIC 907 4887 . 186 . 181 .367 1794 153 1675 .091 .06 . 151 253 932 3560 .262 1 ~. .382 1360 . ..::. 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOST TIME = . 1 1992 .639 3407 1.000 - .639 = .361 I 6 = 60 Xl0**-3 IC = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .585 LEVEL OF SERVICE = A ~PUT LOCATION: WINCHESTER & LARK r, DrST. (PLAN. AREA): LOS GATOS I JUNT DATE: 6/7/84 PEAl< HOUR: PM SIGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. : :;:OWTH FACTOR I. : 0 L~G LANE PATTERN L R LSTSRO LEFT ~ 111000 1100 E 100010 276 ~ 002010 0 ~ 000000 0 OUTPUT I ::G *" LANES CRIT. MOVE L R LSTSRO ~ ...:' 111000 E 1 100000 3 ,., 002000 ..:.. W 0 000000 . JTALS ,:, ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXIST LANE COUNTS THRU RIGHT 813 (> 0 532 479 146 0 0 G N/S (> E/W 0 CYCLE Y+R 6 LENGTH: 90 ADDED TRIPS OUTBOUND 1011 1246 1089 o INBOUND 1913 808 625 o o o o o (> o o o o o o o C. VOL. T. CAP. ADJ.I ADJ. LANE G/C C. CAP. G/C 1913 4903 .39 . 105 .495 2427 276 1675 165 .035 .2 ~"':!'C" . "_'__I...J 479 3560 . 135 .07 .205 730 0' 0 0 (> 0 0 LOST TIME = . 1 2668 .79 3492 1.000 .79 = .21 I 6 = 35 Xl0**-3 IC = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .764 LEVEL OF SERVICE = C : ~PUT LOCATION: WINCHESTER r, DIST. (PLAN. AREA): ( lUNT DATE: 6/7/84 PEAK HOUR: PM SIGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. ( mWTH FACTOR 'l. : 4 L~G LANE PATTERN L R LSTSRO 111000 100010 002010 000000 .~ E LEFT 1150 287 s o o OUTPUT I::G # LANES CRIT. MOVE L R LSTSRO 111000 "":!" '-' E 1 100000 2 002000 W 000000 o .~ JTALS 6 ~< ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXIST+APP'D G Y+R N/S 0 6 E/W 0 3 CYCLE LENGTH: 90 LARK LOS GATOS LANE COUNTS THRU RIGHT INBOUND OUTBOUND 857 0 2007 1077 0 576 863 1302 501 152 ' c:-~ 1144 ChJ.':;, 0 0 0 0 ADDED TF: I PS 6 11 0 o .......,.. ..;..,.;. o o o .,::. o o o C. VOL. ADJ./ LANE C. CAP. T. CAP. G/C ADJ. G/C 2007 4903 .409 .09 .499 2447 287 1675 . 171 .03 .201 337 501 3560 . 141 .06 .201 716 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOST TIME = . 1 2795 .821 3500 1.000 .821 = . 179 / 6 = 30 X10**-3 I rc = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .799 LEVEL OF SERVICE = C 1,~PUT LOCATION: WINCHESTER & LARK ( DIST. (PLAN. AREA): LOS GATOS ( IUNT DATE: 6/7/84 F'EAI< HOUF:: PM ~TGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. ( 10WTH FACTOR I. : 0 LtG LANE PATTERN L F: LSTSRO LEFT . J 111000 1165 E 100010 287 002010 (> 000000 0 LANE COUNTS THRU RIGHT 866 (> 0 579 5()3 152 0 0 ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXIST+APP'D+PROJ G Y+R N/S 0 6 E/W 0 3 CYCLE LENGTH~ 90 INBOUND OUTBOUND 1082 1317 1153 (> ADDED TRIPS 15 9 (> 2031 866 (> (> o o - '. 655 .., .... o o I) o C" JTPUT L:G # LANES CRIT. MOVE C. VOL. T. CAP. L R LSTSRO 3 1 1 1 (H) () E 1 100000 2 002000 hi o 000000 1 ITALS 6 G/C ADJ./ ADJ. LANE G/C C. CAP. 2031 4903 .414 .087 .501 2456 287 1675 . 171 . ()29 .2 335 503 3560 . 141 .058 . 199 708 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOST TII"IE = . 1 2821 .826 3499 1.000 - .826 = .174 = 29 X10**-3 j 6 \ 'C - TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .806 LEVEL OF SERVICE = D 1/'11;'<"!,i:;:'i.~ 'uN I.)J 'Jr,:':!-J-<!!-L ::;. 0L!':: rp~ Hal-'e. ~ \'\11 I ,11.\ :;;~ ~~~Jt~l:rt61o/.= IJ3Ci ~ ~ l 7~ 1, I ~y ~~~\6 r \~ \ ~J~~Rf1 t~ r' ~1~ ~"1 I!x IS,I Joi E:, ,30 ~ ~ ~1 L~lj "1.,3 . 1 t C9 ~;t, 1I3~~~1l,' :. . ~() 1,0-:. t ~01/~ t q}~ -t ~53 ~ IU, I ~~l $1 \ ~6t -t It Vp I D f . P 1tc.J t! tf 12 ~ IJ 1'171, " ,~G:, ~ol 0 jS ~ (7} f1oy3. t q~ I l' qJ,O,{ : )7. 01 '-17~ 11'"'' 11.,0 J i i~1l ~ I ~ ~I t 1 ( ~l> 1.~~ ~Q) D ItXl41' ~~ ~ A l'P I D !Xlc;.1 -t A 1'1" D '" l'(oJ~G1' ~ VA J{16M'1\H.I ~J r \J (.,111.i.!-1'jJ..~ .. :A:. tj( 1N1 J ~L.::il.:f !uN lJ.\~ . 17!t~~ Ho~'t:. .glit 1I ~ 0 ?;JOr!> t t;oiz.. -l- t}(;) ~ /I ')0 ~ ~ ~ 'L-61b r~e:,t ~ t l.\\i:lO 141713 t ~1Y7,+ 'L-~ ~ r-1,16 \ ~~9\...i ~ ~f eN ~O ~l} .. I 0 ~ 0 11 ~ oj 71~'Ll.t!. ,8/ 1090/ J (I~ 1,t; y 1<:.. 1"1 f 1 f r' 1-\1\ \~(" 1 t ( SOl I~z.. V!e.. -;'I~IJ, /)JS D -:. 1,.-os ~ ~x I S,'1>i f1 ItXI41lt--tt; t Al'P'D ~c.l.. II" ~ ~ ~ ~L~1q r~f ~a?l/~t 503/1, to 1,7/ -:.IIS1 11 C; 1/1"1.,1 /, . ~, vlG~- ,ltl 00~ D ~ ~ l ,?o) 1St" t'-Is.1\lIlly t It 1111 0 ~ PItQJ~t1' !XIc;1 -t APP'D ... l'toJ~Gf .. VftH"6M'~N iNPUT LOCATION: WINCHESTER & HACIENDA . DIST. (PLAN. AREA): CAMPBELL JUNT DATE: 6/6/84 PEP~K HOUR: AM ~IGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. ROWTH FACTOR % : 0 LEG LANE PATTERN L R LSTSRO LEFT N 102010 281 E 110010 20 S 101100 22 W 110010 24 nUT PUT EG # LANES CRIT. MOVE L R LSTSRO N 1 100000 E ,.., 110000 - S 2 001100 W 2 110000 OTALS 7 LANE COUNTS THRU RIGHT 511 249 28 55 789 71 109 570 ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. I NIT. : J W EXISTING G NIS 0 E/W 0 CYCLE LENGTH: 90 Y+R 6 "':!" '-' ADDED TRIPS OUTBOUND 868 461 1101 299 INBOUND 1041 103 882 703 o o o o o o o o o o o o C. VOL. T. CAP. ADJ./ ADJ. LANE GIC C. CAP. GIC 281 1675 . 168 .062 .23 385 48 3228 .015 . 124 . 139 449 860 3541 .243 . 124 .367 1300 133 3266 .041 . 124 . 165 539 LOST TIME = .1 1322 .567 2673 1.000 - .567 = .433 I 7 = 62 XI0**-3 Ie = TOTAL CRIT. VOL'STOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .495 LEVEL OF SERVICE = A , WUT LOCATION: WINCHESTER r. DIST. (PLAN. AREA): I )UNT DATE: 6/6/84 PEAI< HOUR: AM SlGNAL TYPE: FULLY AeT. t ~OWTl-i FACTOR I: : 4 L~G LANE PATTERN L R LSTSRO 102010 110010 101100 110010 ~1. HACIENDA CAMPBELL ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXIST+APP'D G Y+R NIS 0 6 E/W 0 ,_, CYCLE LENGTH: 90 U~NE COUNTS LEFT \~ 292 THRU RIGHT INBOUND OUTBOUND 550 259 1101 922 29 57 107 479 840 74 937 1164 113 593 731 311 ADDED TF: I PS o 19 0 (I (l () o 19 0 000 E 21 '3 ,..,-,. 4...:1 ~ 25 nUTPUT I ::G # LANES CRIT. MOVE C. VOL. T. CAP. GIC ADJ./ ADJ. C. CAP. L R LANE GIC LSTSRO ~ 1 100000 292 1675 .174 .059 .233 390 E ,.., 110000 50 3227 .015 .117 .132 426 ..::. 3 ,.., 001100 914 3541 .258 .117 .375 1328 ..:.. W 2 110000 138 3266 .042 .117 .159 519 LOST TIME = . 1 JTALS 7 1394 .589 2663 1 . 000 - .589 = .411 / -, = 59 XI0**-3 i IC - TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = c:-...,~ LEVEL OF SERVICE = A . ...J":"o_1 lPUT LOCATION: WINCHESTER r DIST. (PLAN. AREA): ( )UNT DATE: 6/6/84 1-'t::AV HOUR: AM SIGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. ( mWTH FACTOF: % : 0 L~G LANE PATTERN L R LSTSRO 102010 110010 10 11 00 110010 LEFT ~ E S J 292 21 24 ,..,= ..::...J OUTPUT I ::G # LANES CRIT. MOVE L R LSTSRO ~ 1 100000 E 2 110000 3 ,.., 001100 ..::. W 2 110000 -']TALS 7 ~I, HACIENDA CAMPBELL ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXIST+APP'D+PROJ G Y+R N/S 0 6 E/W 0 '_' CYCLE LENGTH: 90 LANE COUNTS THF:U RIGHT INBOUND OUTBOUND , ~~ 259 1184 938 0.':;'.'::. 29 57 107 479 856 74 954 1247 113 593 731 312 ADDED TRIPS (> o 1 o 83 0 (I 0 16 0 0 0 C. VOL. T. CAP. ADJ./ ADJ. LANE G/C C. CAP. GIC 292 1675 . 174 .058 .232 389 50 3227 .015 . 116 . 131 423 930 3541 .263 . 116 .379 1342 138 3266 .042 . 116 . 158 516 LOST TIME = . 1 1410 .594 2670 1.000 .594 = .406 / 7 = 58 Xl0**-3 IC = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .528 LEVEL OF SERVICE = A ~PUT LOCATION: WINCHESTER ~( HACIENDA C. DIST. (PLAN. AREA): CAMPBELL I JUNT DATE: 6/6/84 . "::AK HOUR: PM SIGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. ~OWTH FACTOR % : 0 I ~G LANE PATTERN L F: LSTSRO LEFT \I 102010 t:: 110010 S 101100 ~ 110010 OUTPUT ::G # LANES '" 1 t:: 2 :; 2 W 2 TIJTALS 7 CRIT. MOVE C. VOL. T. CAP. L R LSTSRO 100000 125 3(>2 51 394 110000 0011 00 110000 LANE COUNTS THRU RIGHT 918 590 94 C' -,. ...J.,:" 797 59 75 58 ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXISTING G Y+R N/S 0 6 E/W (I 3 CYCLE LENGTH: 90 INBOUND OUTBOUND 1244 ADDED TRIPS 00(1 000 (100 000 1633 449 907 259 1278 527 735 G/C ADJ.I ADJ. LANE G/C C. CAP. 125 1675 .075 .044 .119 199 396 3135 .126 .087 .213 668 8C"' 3544 .242 .087 .329 1166 ...JO 469 3104 . 151 .087 .238 739 LOST TIME = . 1 1846 .694 2772 1 . 000 - .694 = .306 / 7 = 44 Xl0**-3 IC - TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .666 LEVEL OF SERVICE = B ~PUT LOCATION: WINCHESTER r, DIST. (PLAN. AREA): I )UNT DATE: 6/6/84 PEAK HOUR: PM SlGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. I ~OWTI--t FACTOF: I. : 4 L~G LANE PATTERN L R LSTSRO 102010 110010 101100 110010 '-I E LEFT 130 314 '3 0:::" -,. ..J.";' lJ 410 OUTPUT I ::G # LANES CRIT. MOVE L R LSTSRO ~ 1 100000 E 2 110000 3 2 001100 W 2 110000 JTALS 7 ~~ HACIENDA CAMPBELL ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXIST+APP'D G Y+F: NIS 0 6 E/W (I 3 CYCLE LENGTH: 90 LANE COUNTS THRU RIGHT INBOUND OUTBOUND 972 614 1716 1320 98 55 467 269 855 61 969 1346 78 60 548 765 ADDED TRIPS o 17 0 o o o 0 0 26 0 0 0 C. VOL. T. CAP. GIC ADJ.I ADJ. LANE GIC C. CAP. 130 1675 .078 .039 . 117 196 412 3135 . 131 .079 .21 658 916 3544 .258 .079 .337 1194 488 3104 . 157 .079 .236 733 LOST TIME = . 1 1946 .724 2781 1.000 .724 = .276 1 7 = 39 X10**-3 IC = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .7 LEVEL OF SERVICE = C ] IPUT LOCATION: WINCHESTER & HACIENDA C DIST. (PLAN. AREA): CAMPBELL ( IUNT DATE: 6/6/84 F-'t:::AI< HOUR: PM SIGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. ( :OWTH FACTOR I. : (I L~G LANE PATTERN L F: LSTSRO LEFT I 102010 130 E 110010 314 S 101100 55 I 110010 410 OUTPUT l:G # LANES " 1 E 2 2 W 2 ~'lTALS 7 LANE COUNTS THRU RIGHT 983 614 98 55 915 61 78 60 ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. I NIT. : J W EXIST+APP'D+PROJ G Y+R NIS 0 6 E/W 0 ,.:;, CYCLE LENGTH: 90 INBOUND 1727 467 1031 548 OUTBOUND 1380 269 1357 767 ADDED TRIPS o 11 0 000 2 60 0 (> 0 0 CRIT. MOVE C. VOL. T. CAP. G/C ADJ./ ADJ. C. CAP. L R LANE G/C LSTSRO 100000 130 1675 .078 .037 .115 193 110000 412 3135 .131 .074 .2()5 643 001100 976 3545 ""7r: .074 .349 1237 ...;;.,~ 110000 488 3104 1r:- .074 .231 717 . ...JI LOST TIME = . 1 2006 .741 2790 1.000 .741 = .259 / 7 = 37 X10**-3 ~ 'C = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .719 LEVEL OF SERVICE = C 1N(,j~L.;i1.~ 'uN I ~) 1 .J('~1.H~11'~:L 4 ~M~!'lu;\ f7~~~ 1101,'(. A'rr" tl.\q 'SI' 1.&\ J ~ ~ ~ 1,~ I + 4 ~ + ~ &!) .f ),., / ~ ~O) ;;z: ~ /1.. 1,1\ --1 L-4; \&- -4 7:t~ ~Ol~ ?1~~ eto V( (, 77'-/ :. 15~ '\tr 1.t 1b~ l' - ~O~ A ~x I S,ll>i l:1 1,~f1t. II ~7 fz" )/ J ~ J ~11 t1tr ~.. ~3I}"Z, f 1'J8/L '. g5/ ');i:I-i ~\') \...-,,~ ~ 4-- 1/\ V I g;.,/ O\'\>~ t r ~ ~ .\ C. 1m' ~ · (;1- l' cpl. 1 ~07 1; t'-Is.1\1Il6t t AV1110 ~ PItQJ~t1' ~~. '1,,1/ 1,1.J ~ ~ ~ ~~1, .,. ~r 11% t )3'/7.., 1;"-1 '-~1 \\~~ r;-1l1 ::--1t " t' S~7 'I ~ t'" yo ~, ~~o 'PI V I G ~D.s ~ ItXI41l t-.tG t A l'P' D ", ~~3 g~)11774' : 1(,/ tXlc;1 -t APP'D .r l'toJesGf ~ VAJ{'6M'~N 1 N1.j ~1,::i'"1 !I)N 17:t~1L Ho~'t:. \.11)', \\0/11...-':,\1-1''- ~ J a ~'-!- "~:;~ r. Y'\ . ~'11':1 ~\~ ~ j ~ ~ ~1J \ 2/j r ~~; is''I?, -t '.f(fJ,IL ,'\~ \-"'-; :-. ~g~ 11,....L. T-"~ -, ;0" ~6 ~ ~ t r~" r VIL~~ ~g1)/11~1 ';. ,:r'Z q ~1' ~ r~ (}O ~IO J 19 -L.. lP~ \~r 4t!:1 ~It! (, \ ~0 S C, ~x IS" "4 f1 170 l' ~2-t. ~1LI'L .to~~7'?.. L~ 7 ~~ ~ \~&~ 1171~ ~ -16 ,r- V/t.', l7~ ~O~ ~ t. ~'-1s.1\lIlly t A V111 D ; PItQJ~t1' ~\~ ~;j.t \')0 J L~ ~ I ~I~ 'L-'7<3 ~~ ~q~ II ,)1'1 {,\1~ ~ ~ ~.~ r ~7 1b~ 1.,,1 l1o-t ~~-t Qll.;, + ~t~1 t Z. /2. /lJ3<{, I Vi G ~ 1774'" tt 7<': ~u~ ~ ltXI ~1l t-.t~ ~ A T'P' D tXlc;1 -t APP'D '" PtoJ~Gf to YftH"6M'~N lNPUT LOCATION: WINCHESTER & KNOWLES . DIST. (PLAN. AREA): CAMPBELL JUNT DATE: 6/11/84 PEAI< HOUR: AM -IGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. ROWTH FACTOR % : 0 LEG LANE PATTERN LANE COUNTS L R LSTSRO LEFT N 102010 67 E 010010 25 3 102010 170 ~ 010010 166 -UTPUT :::G # LANES CRIT. MOVE L R LSTSRO " 1 100000 E 1 010000 3 2 002000 W 1 010000 DTALS 5 ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXISTING G N/S (I E/W (I CYCLE Y+R 6 6 LENGTH: 90 THRU RIGHT INBOUND OUTBOUND 368 125 560 924 16 32 73 392 726 254 1150 507 71 114 351 311 ADDED TRIPS o o (l o o o o o o o o o C. VOL. T. CAP. G/C ADJ./ ADJ. LANE G/C C. CAP. 67 1675 .04 .092 . 132 221 41 1716 .024 .092 .116 199 726 3560 .204 . 184 .388 1381 237 1706 . 139 .092 .231 394 LOST TIME = 1-- . .,,::...;:. 1071 .54 2195 1 . 000 .54 = .46 / 5 = 92 XI0**-3 /C = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .488 LEVEL OF SERVICE = A INPUT lOCATION: WINCHESTER . DIST. (PLAN. AREA): ~OUNT DATE: 6/11/84 PEAI< HOUR: AM rGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. ~OWTH FACTOR I. : 4 LEG LANE PATTERN L R LSTSRO 102010 010010 102010 010010 g,= I<NOWLES CAMPBELL ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXIST+APP'D G Y+R N/S 0 6 E/W 0 6 CYCLE LENGTH: 90 LANE COUNTS N E LEFT 70 26 THF:U RIGHT INBOUND OUTBOUND 402 130 602 980 17 -- 76 408 ..:......:;. 774 264 1215 547 74 119 366 324 ADDED TRIPS o 19 0 000 o 19 0 000 ::; 177 173 JJ JTPUT =:G # LANES CRIT. MOVE C. VOL. T. CAP. G/C ADJ./ ADJ. C. CAP. L R LANE G/C LSTSRO N 1 100000 70 1675 .042 .088 . 13 218 E 1 010000 43 1717 . ()25 .088 .113 194 S 2 002000 774 3560 .217 .175 .392 1396 W 1 010000 247 1706 .145 .088 "..,"":!'"":!' 397 . ..:.,.._1._, LOST TIME = .133 OTALS 5 1134 .562 22()5 1 . 000 - .562 = .438 1 5 = 88 X10**-3 /C = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .514 LEVEL OF SERVICE = A INPUT I 8CATION: WINCHESTER & KNOWLES l , D I ST . (PLAN. AREA): CAMPBELL LJUNT DATE: 6/11/84 PEAK HOUR: AM ~ (GNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. I mWTH FACTOR I. : 0 LEG LANE PATTERN LANE COUNTS L F: LSTSRO LEFT 70 N 102010 E 010010 3 102010 A 010010 JTPUT I ~G # LANES I,J 1 E 1 3 2 N 1 JTALS 5 26 177 173 ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. I NIT. : J W EXIST+APP'D+PROJ G Y+R N/S 0 6 E/W 0 6 CYCLE LENGTH: 90 THRU RIGHT INBOUND OUTBOUND 408 130 608 1012 17 ~~ 76 408 ..::..;:.. 806 264 1247 ==~ ....J...J..:;I 74 119 366 324 ADDED TRIPS 060 0(10 o 32 (> 000 CRIT. MOVE C. VOL. T. CAP. G/C ADJ./ ADJ. C. CAP. L R LANE G/C LSTSRO 100000 70 1675 .042 .086 .128 214 010000 4~ 1717 . ()25 .086 . 111 191 ..::. 002000 806 3560 .226 .172 .398 1417 010000 247 1706 .145 .086 .231 394 LOST TIME = . 133 1166 .571 2216 1.000 - .571 = .429 = 86 Xl0**-3 1 5 IC = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .526 LEVEL OF SERVICE = A INPUT I ~CATION: WINCHESTER & KNOWLES . DIST. (PLAN. AREA): CAMPBELL cOUNT DATE: 6/11/84 PEAI< HOUR: PM rGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. _~OWTH FACTOR % : 0 LEG LANE PATTERN LANE COUNTS L R LSTSRO LEFT N 102010 ~~ ~ 010010 230 3 102010 193 W 010010 155 ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXISTING G N/S 0 E/W 0 CYCLE Y+R 6 6 LENGTH: 90 THRU RIGHT INBOUND OUTBOUND 1014 141 1188 816 83 67 380 67 594 20 807 1472 14 228 397 417 ADDED TRIPS 000 000 000 (> 0 0 JTPUT _'=:G # LANES CRIT. MOVE C. VOL. T. CAP. G/C ADJ./ ADJ. C. CAP. L R LANE G/C LSTSRO \I ,.., 002000 1014 3560 .285 .073 .358 1274 ..:.. t=: 1 010000 313 1703 . 184 . ()37 .221 376 ;3 1 100000 193 1675 .1-15 .037 .152 255 N 1 010000 169 1684 . 1 .037 .137 231 LOST TIME = .133 JTALS 5 1689 .817 2136 1 . 000 - .817 = . 183 / 5 = 37 XI0**-3 v/C - TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .791 LEVEL OF SERVICE = C INPUT lOCATION: WINCHESTER & KNOWLES . DIST. (PLAN. AREA): CAMPBELL LOUNT DATE: 6/11/84 PEAK HOUR: PM IGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. _ROWTH FACTOR % : 4 LEG LANE PATTERN LANE COUNTS L R LSTSRO LEFT N 102010 34 E 010010 239 S 102010 201 W 010010 161 ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. I NIT. : J W EXIST+APP'D G Y+R NIB 0 6 E/W 0 6 CYCLE LENGTH: 90 THRU RIGHT INBOUND OUTBOUND 1072 147 1253 875 86 70 395 70 644 21 866 1548 15 237 413 434 ADDED TRIPS o 17 0 000 o 26 0 000 UTPUT EG # LANES CRIT. MOVE C. VOL. T. CAP. GIC ADJ./ ADJ. C. CAP. L R LANE GIC LSTSRO N 2 002000 1072 3560 .301 .06 .361 1285 E 1 010000 -:r,",C" 1703 . 191 . ()3 .221 376 ,_I":"'I...l S 1 100000 201 1675 . 12 . ()3 .15 251 W 1 010000 176 1684 .105 .03 .135 227 LOST TIME = .133 OTALS 5 1774 .85 2139 1.000 - .85 = . 15 / 5 = 30 Xl0**-3 ..,/C = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .829 LEVEL OF SERVICE = D 11\JPUT LOCATION: WINCHESTER & KNOWLES ( , D I ST . (PLAN. AREA): CAMPBELL ( JUNT DATE: 6/11/84 PEAI< HOUF: : PM r:GNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. ( mWTH FACTOR % : 0 LEG LANE PATTERN LANE COUNTS L R LSTSRO LEFT ,II 102010 34 E 010010 239 3 102010 201 ~ 010010 161 ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXIST+APP'D+PROJ G Y+R NIB 0 6 E/W (I 6 CYCLE LENGTH: 90 THRU RIGHT INBOUND OUTBOUND 1096 147 1277 880 86 70 395 70 649 21 871 1572 15 237 413 434 ADDED TRIPS o 24 0 000 050 000 r'JTPUT I ::G # LANES CRIT. MOVE C. VOL. T. CAP. G/C ADJ./ ADJ. C. CAP. L R LANE G/C LSTSRO ~ 2 002000 1096 3560 .308 .057 .365 1299 E 1 010000 -:r ~ C" 1703 .191 .029 .22 375 .':'I~~ 3 1 100000 201 1675 I'::> .029 .149 250 '1./ 1 010000 176 1684 .105 .029 .134 226 LOST TIME = .133 JTALS 5 1798 .857 2150 1 . 000 - .857 = .143 / 5 = 29 XI0**-3 IC = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .836 LEVEL OF SERVICE = D 1 N'( .j ~L.::i'1 ! \) N \J II\JL-U!;<;Ilbl2..'; '..(;\~\M~~ r!t~~ HoL't:. ~JV\ \~ l~~~ (1 q t l.\11 7U:,I." l' 1.]'1' ~ 7o<g, \'.~ ~ ~. \\~ ~~tr \~ '''r~(, l~ L,,~ 7 4.r-- II.. ~ 1/~ 10g/ 1)7t5'" /.} I V 16~. ~' I Lo~ ~ ~x IS,11'i f1 J ~I\t t" 70 of Lf7t @O,,!t.. ... 1111 " 71.,} ~1~ L3~ \\<\\ ~,1" 11,,'>1',)7'-t ~ I'{~I "\ 1 ~ ~q v I L. '-; ,s' < \1' -:} <to/' v L05 A ~'-1S. \lIlly t A 1111 D ~ PItQJ~t1' JO 10\ ( 1M ~7 t 77Vz, ~ ~~1'" '-7~r 0; ,J '1~ ~~; V(G}~11/77~)', I ~~ ','1 ~ i11( l.o 111 11~ 1)-1 . S A ltXl~ l'P' D tXlc;1 -t APP'D ... ~~G1')o H" M'~N 1 !\I 1 oj '(l,iL.~ 'uN 17~ ~ ~ Ho~'c.. \\.1\ 10\"' ~ :J~+( \~~ ~~t -4\~ 4., ~'V1t4.. V-,,)O ~ tt i' ~, ~t\1P , \"11' \oQb I '}4 ,J~~~ II, \ -4\~ ~() ~I" .1,7~ ~;,\ i t~ ~ 10' lI\~ 10' \.J0 I "c./-h5 ~ TI?,~ <;t. ;<.hQ", '.'.; .s PM I ~ 1 ~ It, t ") 17 -1 l~" -1 1'" '-1I ~ It V !G:- 1I8t//77! ~ r g~ ~os D ~XIS,II>if, loqfol ~ l' }l/.} } to I j. l:rb ~ 't~.t7 y I G~, /th' 0/17'1'/ ~ ,ql l/()~ ~ t'-Is.1\lIlly t AV1110 ~ PItQJ~t1' l~~ \@~ ,)1 J ~~ ~ \l,\ ...L L 1() \? ~& -"'t:7f ~'\ '\11 i tal &l.\~ vI I c 1~1 ~ 1( }vf Jr tOI f 17{" ~ Iz..>~ v/V? 1~7911"}7( ,;,QO ~O? G ItXI41'1 t-.tG ~ A l'P' D !Xlc;1 -t APP'D ... l'toJ~Gf l' VA 1'f"6M'~N ~ .\IPUT LOCATION: WINCHESTER & SUNNY OAKS ~. DIST. (PLAN. AREA): CAMPBELL JUNT DATE: 4/13/82 PEAK HOUR: AM SIGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. ~OWTH FACTOR % : 0 ~cG LANE PATTERN LANE COUNTS L R LSTSRO LEFT o o 26 44 \I 102000 E 000000 S 102010 tJ 100010 OUTPUT :::G # LANES \I 1 E (I S 2 W 1 OTALS 4 ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXISTING G Y+R N/B 0 5 E/W (I 4.5 CYCLE LENGTH: 120 THRU RIGHT I "mOUND OUTBOUND 828 64 892 1356 0 0 (I 0 1312 0 1338 900 0 72 116 90 ADDED TRIPS 000 (I 0 0 000 000 CRIT. MOVE C. VOL. T. CAP. GIC ADJ./ ADJ. C. CAP. L R LANE G/C LBTSRO 100000 0 1675 0 . 132 .132 221 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 002000 1312 3560 .369 .263 .632 225() 100000 44 1675 .026 .132 . 158 265 LOST TIME = . (>79 1356 .474 2736 1.000 - .474 = .526 / 4 = 132 X10**-3 /C = TOTAL CRIT. VDL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .496 LEVEL OF SERVICE = A :,.IPUT LOCATION: WINCHESTER ( DIST. (PLAN. AREA): ( lUNT DATE: 4/13/82 PEAI< HOUR: AM ~TGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. ( mWTH FACTOF: % : 4 L~G LANE PATTERN, L F: LSTSRO 102000 000000 102010 100010 J E J nl JTPUT l ~G # LANES 1 E 0 2 w 1 JTALS 4 LEFT o o 27 46 <> 1::1. SUNNY OAKS CAMPBELL ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXIST+APP'D G Y+R N/S 0 5 E/W 0 4.5 CYCLE LENGTH: 120 LANE COUNTS THRU RIGHT INBOUND OUTBOUND 879 67 946 1429 0 0 0 0 1383 0 1410 954 0 75 121 94 ADDED TRIPS o 18 0 000 o 19 0 000 CRIT. MOVE C. VOL. T. CAP. GIC ADJ./ ADJ. C. CAP. L F: LANE G/C LSTSRO 100000 0 1675 0 .126 .126 211 000000 0 0 0 0 (I (I 002000 1383 3560 .388 ?C"~ .641 2282 . ...-"""._1 100000 46 1675 .027 .126 .153 256 LOST TIME = .079 1429 .494 2749 1.000 - .494 = .506 X10**-3 / 4 = 126 I IC = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .52 LEVEL OF SERVICE = A _ ~F'UT LOCATION: WINCHESTER (, DIST. (PLAN. AREA): I JUNT DATE: 4/13/82 PEAI< HOUF:: AM SlGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. I ~OWTH FACTOR % : 0 L~G LANE PATTERN L R LSTSRO 102000 000000 102010 100010 LEFT \! E o o '3 """)'"7 ,~ I \J 46 nlJTPUT I ::G # LANES CRIT. MOVE L R LSTSRO " 1 100000 E 0 000000 3 2 002000 W 1 100000 JTALS 4 g( SUNNY OAKS CAMPBELL ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. I NIT. : J W EXIST+AF'F"D+PROJ G Y+R N/S 0 5 E/W 0 4.5 CYCLE LENGTH: 120 LANE COUNTS THRU RIGHT INBOUND OUTBOUND 962 67 1029 1444 0 0 0 0 1398 0 1425 1037 0 75 121 94 ADDED TRIPS o 83 0 (I (I o (I 15 o o o o C. VOL. T. CAP. G/C ADJ.I ADJ. LANE G/C C. CAP. 0 1675 0 . 125 . 125 209 0 0 0 <) 0 0 1398 3560 .393 ,..,.". .643 2289 ."::'..J 46 1675 .027 1"""" 1"""" 255 . ":"w . ..J..::. LOST TIME = .079 1444 .499 2753 1.000 - .499 = .501 I 4 = 125 XI0**-3 IC = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .525 LEVEL OF SERVICE = A : IPUT LOCATION: WINCHESTER & SUNNYOAKS r DIST. (PLAN. AREA): CAMPBELL ( lUNT DATE: 4/13/82 F--t::':AI< HOUR: PM SIGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. ( mWTH FACTOR I. : 0 L~G LANE PATTERN LANE COUNTS L R LSTSRO LEFT ~ 102000 (I E 000000 0 S 102010 51 ) 100010 48 ANAL. ANAL. EXIST G N/S 0 E/W (I CYCLE Y+R DATE: 7/11/84 INIT.: JW 5 4.5 LENGTH: 120 THRU RIGHT 1518 180 0 0 987 241 0 C' -,. ~.-=, INBOUND 1698 1279 101 OUTBOUND 1035 241 1571 231 ADDED TRIPS 000 000 000 000 (> OUTPUT L :G # LANES CRIT. MOVE C. VOL. T. CAP. GIC ADJ./ ADJ. C. CAP. L R LANE G/C LSTSRO 'j ,.., 002000 1518 3560 .426 .218 .644 2293 ..:.. E 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 100000 51 1675 .03 .109 .139 233 W 1 100000 48 1675 .029 .109 .138 231 LOST TIME = .079 ~'1TALS 4 1617 .564 2757 1.000 - .564 = .436 / 4 = 109 X10**-3 \ 'c = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .587 LEVEL OF SERVICE = A INPUT LOCATION: WINCHESTER i , DIST. (PLAN. AF:EA): I JUNT DATE: 4/13/82 PEAK HOUR: PM ;1GNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. I ~OWTH FACTOR I. : 4 LEG LANE PATTERN L R LSTSRO 102000 000000 102010 100010 LEFT o'~ E (I o :; 1:"- ,J.':;. 50 I) r'jTPUT i ::G # LANES CRIT. MOVE L R LSTSRO \! ,.., 002000 ..::. E 0 000000 :; 1 100000 ',Aj 1 100000 JTALS 4 ~1. SUNNYOAKS CAMPBELL ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. I NIT. : J W EXIST+APP'D G Y+R N/S 0 5 E/W 0 4.5 CYCLE LENGTH: 120 LANE COUNTS THRU RIGHT INBOUND OUTBOUND 1596 187 1-8- 1102 / '':;1 0 0 0 251 1052 251 1356 1651 0 55 105 240 ADDED TRIPS 17 o 26 o o o o o o o o o C. VOL. T. CAP. C. CAP. GIC ADJ./ ADJ. LANE G/C 1596 3560 . 448 . 206 . 654 2328 0 0 0 0 (I 0 c:--,. 1675 (>32 103 135 226 ,J.";. . . . 50 1675 03 103 133 ~,..,-=!" . . . ":".L._I LOST TIME = .079 1699 .589 2777 1.000 - .589 = .411 = 103 X10**-3 1 4 (C = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .612 LEVEL OF SERVIeE = B ~ I~PUT LOCATION: WINCHESTER ( DIST. (PLAN. AREA): ( )UNT DATE: 4/13/82 PEAI< HOUR: PM ~~GNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. ( mWTH FACTOR :': : 0 LEG LANE PATTERN L R LSTSRO 102000 000000 102010 100010 ~..; SUNNYOAKS CAMPBELL ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. I NIT.: J W EXIST+APP'D+PROJ G Y+F: NIS 0 5 E/W 0 4.5 CYCLE LENGTH: 120 LANE COUNTS LEFT THRU RIGHT INBOUND OUTBOUND 1607 187 1794 1128 0 0 0 285 1078 285 1416 1662 0 55 105 240 ADDED TRIPS o 11 0 000 o 26 34 000 ,~ E o o ) c:' -,. ~.":t 50 (""" JTPUT l ~G # LANES CRIT. MOVE C. VOL. T. CAP. G/C ADJ./ ADJ. C. CAP. L R LANE G/C LSTSRO 2 002000 1607 3560 .451 .204 .655 2332 E 0 000000 0 (I 0 (I 0 0 ) 1 100000 C'~ 1675 . (>32 .102 .134 224 ~._I hJ 1 100000 50 1675 .03 .102 .132 221 LOST TIME = .079 JTALS 4 1710 .592 2777 1.000 - .592 = .408 I 4 = 102 XI0**-3 I IC = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .616 LEVEL OF SEF:V I CE = B f {'II.".('", fl( N oj "~(;t,,. ~ '" I J .'. " ~.. f itLJ,.;/..I/l" ''..'~ 12 .:.... 4lA II1lVJL) oA~ ~ p~~~ :101,1(. C\ ~\ , ~~J ~ ~ l~ t 17\1.1 _ 77/r, ~1J ~ ~ ~1' 17~.~'; z, t 1 Lj ~ I b 1 ",t<6. 7. - J' ~'^ l),~ ...J V/6~ 7b1 /I~Y; ~ IL?q It'6l1 t 1'" "/v I~V; ~ · 6/ 1Z: Ja ~ , t ~tt 1,1 nq; 1,.(" \1\1.. , ~O~ ~ ~ ~D~ /" A ~x IS,11>i f1 {/:f qc.v / J {~ \7~~/1I~ ttf ~ 71~ ltXI41l t-.tG t A l'P' D \l,l. --.J 1l! ~ lti 1,1 \)9t V Iv I- 77 H J (l~tL):; I ,,~ Lot;." A. tJ.ls.1\lIllt t A V111 0 ~ PI?QJ~t1' !XI;1 -t APP'D ... l'toJ~Gf.. VftI1"6M'~N 1 No( oj ~'!'(;.t.1';jN ~ l"J~J--~7"'~'Q.. 4:: ~IANi'lt."'C1-f).~ f1..o.~ ~~~I' V, r:\J ."'-.. ?t"\ \~~ \c;)~ 't,tl)~ l' '71 -T 4g ~ ~90 1~1' I~l, l~~(..!~ -l- r; >+ .1)0 ~ ~Ol .J ~ ~ J ~ ~ \\\~ s~ Ilk /, qO!/ ~,~} f:,}~ ~90~ '&1/ i 11 ( " I~ I~Zi f1 ItXI41l t-.tG t A l'P' D 4.1 1\,c1 I~Of/~ t ~?+ 40 ~ qo? \ J ~ ~ 60-.11 V I~ 1, ~OI /~7i 4. ,[,~ ?f,~ ~~ ~ ~ {\~~ ~~.~ \ol'i ~"l s.1 \ IIllt t A Vp 1 0 ~ P ItOJ ~ t1' tXlc;1 -t APP'D ... ~~cr l' ~1'f"l,M'~N INPUT I )CATION: WINCHESTEH ~f. OLD CAMDEN l. DIST. (PLAN. AREA): CAMPBELL COUNT DATE: 6/12/84 r::AI< HOUR: AM ~ [GNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. GROWTH FACTOR % : 0 I ~G LANE PATTERN LANE COUNTS L R LSTSRO LEFT 75 16 o o N 102000 - 100010 :; 002010 W 000000 I JTPUT LEG # LANES I~ 1 - 1 S 2 !j 0 ,JTALS 4 CRIT. MOVE C. VOL. T. CAP. L R LSTSRO 100000 100000 002000 000000 ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXISTING G Y+R NIS 0 5 E/W 0 4.5 CYCLE LENGTH: 120 THRU RIGHT INBOUND OUTBOUND 439 0 514 864 0 65 81 10:-'!: 799 28 827 455 0 0 0 0 ADDED TRIPS o o o o o o o o o (> o o G/C ADJ./ ADJ. LANE G/C C. CAP. 75 1675 .045 .161 .206 345 16 1675 .01 .161 .171 286 799 3560 .224 .321 .545 1940 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOST TIME = .079 890 .358 2571 1.000 - .358 = .642 = 161 X10**-3 I 4 V/C = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .346 LEVEL OF SERVICE = A INPUT JCATION: WINCHESTER _. D I ST . (PLAN. AREA): COUNT DATE: 6/12/84 - =:AI< HOUR: AM IGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. GROWTH FACTOR % : 4 I EG LANE PATTERN L F: LSTSRO 102000 100010 002010 000000 N LEFT 110 24 o o 5 W UTPUT LEG # LANES CRIT. MOVE L R LSTSRO N 1 100000 E 1 100000 S ,.., 002000 ..:.. W 0 000000 ,OTALS 4 81. OLD CAMDEN CAMPBELL ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXIST+APP'D G Y+R N/S 0 5 E/W 0 4.5 CYCLE LENGTH: 120 LANE COUNTS THRU RIGHT INBOUND OUTBOUND 475 0 585 908 0 71 95 194 837 84 921 499 0 0 0 0 ADDED TRIPS 32 18 0 3 7 o o o 6 o 55 o C. VOL. T. CAP. G/C ADJ.I ADJ. LANE GIC C. CAP. 110 1675 .066 .152 .218 365 24 1675 .014 .152 .166 278 837 3560 .235 .3()3 .538 1915 0 0 (I 0 0 (I LOST TIME = .079 971 .394 2558 1 . 000 - .394 = .606 I 4 = 152 XIO**-3 vie = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .38 LEVEL OF SERVICE = A INPUT OCATION: WINCHESTER ~. OIST. (PLAN. AREA): COUNT DATE: 6/12/84 EAI< HOUR: AM IGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. GROWTH FACTOR % : 0 'EG LANE PATTERN L R LSTSRO 102000 100010 002010 000000 ~( OLD CAMDEN CAMPBELL ANAL. OATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXIST+APP'O+PROJ G Y+R N/S 0 5 E/W 0 4.5 CYCLE LENGTH: 120 LANE COUNTS N E S W LEFT 110 24 o o THRU RIGHT INBOUND OUTBOUND 493 0 603 911 0 71 95 194 840 84 924 517 0 0 0 0 AODED TRIPS o 18 0 000 o ~ () 000 UTPUT LEG # LANES CRIT. MOVE C. VOL. T. CAP. G/C AOJ.I ADJ. C. CAP. L R LANE GIC LSTSRO N 1 100000 110 1675 .066 .151 .217 ..:;.6.';:. E 1 100000 24 1675 .014 .151 . 165 276 S 2 002000 840 3560 .236 .3(>3 .539 1919 W 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOST TIME = .079 ,OTALS 4 974 .395 2558 1.000 - .395 = .605 1 4 = 151 X10**-3 V/C = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .381 LEVEL OF SERVICE = A TNPUT OCATION: WINCHESTER G. DIST. (PLAN. AREA): COUNT DATE: 6/12/84 'EAI< HOUR: PM ~ I GNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. GROWTH FACTOR % : 0 '.EG LANE PATTERN L F: LSTSRO N 102000 E 100010 S 002010 W 000000 IUTPUT LEG # LANES N 1 E 1 S ,.., ..::. W 0 rOTALS 4 CRIT. MOVE C. VOL. T. CAP. L R LSTSRO 100000 LEFT 67 18 o o 100000 002000 000000 ~1. OLD CAMDEN CAMPBELL ANAL. ANAL. EXIST G N/S 0 E/W 0 CYCLE DATE: 7/11/84 INIT.: JW Y+R 5 4.5 LENGTH: 120 LANE COUNTS THRU RIGHT 861 0 o 76 1132 11 o 0 INBOUND 928 94 1143 o o o o o OUTBOUND 1208 78 879 o ADDED TRIPS o o o o o o o o G/C C. CAP. ADJ./ ADJ. LANE G/C 67 1675 .04 .138 .178 298 18 1675 .011 .138 .149 250 1132 356C) .318 .276 .594 2115 (I 0 0 0 0 0 LOST TIME = .079 1217 .448 2663 1.000 - .448 = .552 = 138 XI0**-3 / 4 V/C = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .457 LEVEL OF SERVICE = A TNPUT OCATION: WINCHESTER G. D I ST. (PLAN. AREA): COUNT DATE: 6/12/84 EAI< HOUR: PM IGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. GROWTH FACTOR % : 4 'EG LANE PATTERN L R LSTSRO N 102000 E 100010 S 002010 W 000000 UTPUT LEG # LANES N 1 E 1 S 2 W 0 rGTALS 4 CRIT. MOVE C. VOL. T. CAP. L R LSTSRO 100000 LEFT 76 74 o o 100000 002000 000000 81. OLD CAMDEN CAMPBELL ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXIST+AF'P'D G Y+F: N/S 0 5 E/W 0 4.5 CYCLE LENGTH: 120 LANE COUNTS THRU RIGHT INBOUND OUTBOUND 895 0 971 1301 0 101 175 93 1200 17 1217 969 0 0 0 (> ADDED TRIPS 600 55 0 22 ,.., -,. ...::....:' 6 o o o o GIC ADJ./ ADJ. LANE G/C C. CAP. 76 1675 .045 . 124 . 169 283 74 1675 .044 . 124 . 168 281 1200 3560 ~"':!'- .248 .585 2083 . 0_'0_1/ 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOST TIME = .079 1350 .505 2647 1 . 000 - .505 = .495 I 4 = 124 XI0**-3 V/C = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .51 LEVEL OF SERVICE = A -\lPUT JCATION: WINCHESTER C. DIST. (PLAN. AREA): COUNT DATE: 6/12/84 EAI< HOUR: PM ~IGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. GROWTH FACTOR I. : 0 :::G LANE PATTEHN L R LSTSRO 102000 100010 002010 000000 N LEFT 76 74 S W o o _UTPUT LEG # LANES CRIT. MOVE L R LSTSRO N 1 100000 E 1 100000 S 2 002000 W (I 000000 TOTALS 4 ~J; OLD CAMDEN CAMPBELL ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXIST+APP'D+PROJ G Y+R NIS 0 5 E/W 0 4.5 CYCLE LENGTH: 120 LANE COUNTS THRU RIGHT INBOUND OUTBOUND 898 0 974 1314 0 101 175 93 1213 17 1230 972 0 0 0 0 ADDED TRIPS o o o o "':!" 0 '-' 0 0 13 0 0 0 C. VOL. T. CAP. ADJ./ ADJ. LANE G/C C. CAP. G/C 76 1675 .045 .123 .168 281 74 1675 .044 .123 .167 280 1213 3560 .341 .245 .586 2086 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOST TIME = .079 1363 .509 2647 1.000 .509 = .491 1 4 = 123 X10**-3 V/C = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .515 LEVEL OF SERVICE = A 1 N'l t1 ~l,b'~i !~N W' "l<"'I..H:1S'n~<. sr OU,) Irf\r,!;J~.~ fJ~ ;\.~ Hol.\t:. Am q)~ 1<;' 1~ + II, l- l~'/7.. ~ 11 ~ I 41t; 1\0 110 l' VIi' 9,~1i2 -= 'St77 ~ J ~ ~ ~ l. '-~~ ~ ~ I/, I" ~ L1\ ~~3/ CCX 'MU " r~~ 1~1h j ,34 t ~ i V /6 =-, ~~ It ,.. V jG'/ ( 71 ~{.~W1I59 %,1- 'S~ 1'1~ 1<0 ~ ~ tif1 ~'\~ \ \~ \l () to 1,~ ~ ~~ol'J, -= + ~ ~ 't..-J~ c-1,~ 111 ~"o 5~ ltXI41l t-.tG t A l'P' D ~t;I.' "k., ~~'~l~ I 7..G 1~V; I t /l ~o) A t'-l s.1 \ lilt, t A 1111 D t P ItQJ ~ t1' tXlc;1 -t APP'D .f l'toJ~cr l' VftH"~M'~N 1 Nl.j ~L.d(.1 '.;>1\1 lj,j \1\)GJ...lu.~bK ~ 0[..0 (J\)",\~10 17~~~ Ho~'C. PM r \ ~ ~t (.,7 ~ \~ ~ 11JZ/z. ::. &tSl ~q~) 110 { ~ ~ I~ook t 1'- -r 1~ :::'7(,'0 ~~ " \~ j\( (SO ft','(. 11 I" ~~ti~()~QN \ \ \\,~ ~t;IJ II~ ~ if ~ I ~l (, LI01 ~1~ 1l.)f:j/ /r~~~' t. ,t;> ~~7 ~ 1~r \1" 1'7.00 ~os A I!x IS,ll>i f1 1f\t 11., 0 ~ ~ L.. \ Z 171z 1- 11, l' 1 ~.. 17 V IhI41\t-.tG t Al'P'D 't- \~I r:--11{ tt~ \~'} 15'1 }lf1h; ..S) Lo~ A t'-Is.1\lIllt t A 1111 0 ~ PItQJl!4 tX19f -t APP'D ... l'toJgGf.. ~Jof'6M'~N r T'\IPUT i JCATION: CAMDEN ~~ HWY17SBOFF L. DIST. (PLAN. AREA): SAN JOSE COUNT DATE: 9/21/84 :::AI< HOUR: AM _IGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. GROWTH FACTOR % : 0 ::G LANE PATTERN L R LSTSRO 012010 203000 000000 003010 LANE COUNTS ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXIST G Y+R N/S 0 4 E/W 0 6.5 CYCLE LENGTH: 139 I\l LEFT 602 217 o 2 383 INBOUND OUTBOUND ADDED TRIPS 987 0 0 0 0 2599 1585 0 0 0 (l 374 0 0 0 1138 2765 0 0 0 THRU RIGHT 2382 () s W o o 155 o 983 JTPUT LEG # LANES CRIT. MOVE C. VOL. T. CAP. GIC ADJ./ ADJ. C. CAP. L R LANE G/C LSTSRO N - 012000 604 5235 .115 .181 .296 1550 E -,. 003000 2382 5340 .446 . 181 .627 3348 .-=, S 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOST TIME = .076 TOTALS 6 2986 ' ~-. 4898 .0.':;-1 1 . 000 - .637 = -6~ / 6 = 61 XI0**-3 . ..:" ..:... V/C = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .61 LEVEL OF SERVICE = B TNPUT OCATION: CAMDEN & HWY17SBOFF ~. DIST. (PLAN. AREA): SAN JOSE COUNT DATE: 9/21/84 EAI< HOUR: AM IGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. GROWTH FACTOR % : 4 'EG LANE PATTERN LANE COUNTS L R LSTSRO LEFT THRU RIGHT N 012010 823 2 448 E 203000 345 2633 0 S 000000 0 0 0 W 003010 0 1132 161 ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXIST+APP'D G Y+R NIS 0 4 E/W 0 6.5 CYCLE LENGTH: 139 INBOUND OUTBOUND ADDED TRIPS 1273 (I 197 0 50 2978 1955 119 156 0 (I 508 0 (I I) 1293 3081 0 110 0 UTPUT LEG # LANES CRIT. MOVE C. VOL. T. CAP. GIC ADJ.I ADJ. C. CAP. L F: LANE G/C LSTSRO N ~ 012000 825 C"'"'"'\-:r'C- 158 136 .294 1539 ,"'I ,J..::....:I~ . . E 3 003000 2633 5340 .493 . 136 .629 3359 S 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 000000 0 0 (I 0 I) 0 LOST TIME = .076 tOTALS 6 3458 .727 4898 1.000 - .727 = .273 1 6 = 46 XI0**-3 V/C = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. - .706 LEVEL OF SERVICE = C INPUT JCATION: CAMDEN & HWY17SBOFF _. DIST. (PLAN. AREA): SAN JOSE COUNT DATE: 9/21/84 EAI< HOUR: AM IGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. GROWTH FACTOR % : 0 I EG LANE PATTERN LANE COUNTS L F: LSTSRO LEFT N 012010 823 ~ 203000 345 S 000000 0 W 003010 0 ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXIST+APP'D+PROJ G Y+R N/S 0 4 E/W 0 6.5 CYCLE LENGTH: 139 THRU RIGHT INBOUND OUTBOUND 2 471 1296 (> 2657 0 3002 1964 0 0 0 509 1141 162 1303 3128 ADDED TRIPS o (> 23 o 24 0 (> 0 0 (I 9 1 UTPUT LEG # LANES CRIT. MOVE C. VOL. T. CAP. GlC ADJ.I ADJ. C. CAP. L R LANE G/C LSTSRO N "':!" 012000 825 5235 .158 134 .292 1529 '-' . E 3 003000 2657 5340 .498 .134 .632 3375 S (> 000000 0 0 0 0 0 (> W 0 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOST TIME = .076 .OTALS 6 3482 .732 4904 1.000 - .732 = .268 1 6 = 45 X10**-3 V/C = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .71 LEVEL OF SERVICE = C INPUT JCATION: CAMDEN & HWY17SBOFF _. DIST~ (PLAN. AREA): SAN JOSE COUNT DATE: 9/21/84 =:AI< HOUR: PM IGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. GROWTH FACTOR % : 0 I ~G LANE PATTERN L R LSTSRO N 012010 - 203000 :3 000000 W 003010 JTPUT LEG # LANES .\1 0_' - 2 S 0 IJ "':!" 0_' ..JTALS 8 ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXISTING G Y+R N/S (I 4 E/W (> 6.5 CYCLE LENGTH: 139 LANE COUNTS LEFT THRU 1942 1 345 1788 RIGHT 637 (> o INBOUND OUTBOUND o ADDED TRIPS 000 000 000 000 2580 2133 ~8~7 ..:;, .';1 o o o 1895 o 2017 468 122 2425 CRIT. MOVE C. VOL. T. CAP. G/C ADJ./ ADJ. C. CAP. L R LANE G/C LSTSRO 012000 1943 5235 .371 .031 .402 2104 200000 345 3015 .114 .021 . 135 407 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 003000 1895 5340 .355 .031 .386 2061 LOST TIME = .076 4183 .916 4572 1 . 000 - .916 = .084 / 8 = 10 XI0**-3 VIC = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = .915 LEVEL OF SERVICE = E INPUT JCATION: CAMDEN & HWY17SBOFF _. DIST. (PLAN. AREA): SAN JOSE COUNT DATE: 9/21/84 -=:AK HOUR: PM IGNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. GROWTH FACTOR % : 4 I ~G LANE PATTERN L R LSTSRO N 012010 - 203000 3 000000 W 003010 JTPUT LEG # LANES N 3 E ,.., ..:.. S 0 W "':!" '-' ,OTALS 8 ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. I NIT. : J W EXIST+APP'D G Y+F: N/S 0 4 E/W 0 6.5 CYCLE LENGTH: 139 LANE COUNTS LEFT THRU 1 1980 o 2117 RIGHT 675 o o 127 INBOUND 2807 2484 OUTBOUND ADDED TRIPS 111 0 13 145 120 0 000 o 146 0 2131 504 o o o 4248 o 632 2655 2244 CRIT. MOVE C. VOL. T. CAP. G/C ADJ./ ADJ. C. CAP. L R LANE G/C LSTSRO 012000 2132 5235 .407 -.017 .39 2042 200000 504 3015 .167 -.012 .155 467 000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 003000 2117 5340 .396 -.017 .379 2024 LOST TIME = .076 4753 1 . 046 4533 1 . 000 - 1.046= -.046 1 8 = -6 XI0**-3 V/C = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = 1.049 LEVEL OF SERVICE = F INPUT l lCATION: CAMDEN ~~ HWY17SBOFF ( DIST. (PLAN. AREA): SAN JOSE COUNT DATE: 9/21/84 r>':AI< HOUR: PM !: GNAL TYPE: FULLY ACT. GROWTH FACTOR % : 0 LEG LANE PATTERN L R LSTSRO 012010 203000 N 3 000000 W 003010 I JTF'UT Lt::G # LANES \I -:r '-' ,.., - ..:.. S 0 N "':!" '-' JTALS 8 ANAL. DATE: 7/11/84 ANAL. INIT.: JW EXIST+AF'P'D+PROJ G Y+R NIS 0 4 E/W 0 6.5 CYCLE LENGTH: 139 LANE COUNTS LEFT INBOUND 2810 2487 o 2278 THRU 1 1983 o 2147 RIGHT 678 o (> 131 2131 504 o o CRIT. MOVE C. VOL. T. CAP. G/C L R LSTSRO 012000 2132 5235 .407 200000 504 3015 . 167 000000 0 0 0 003000 2147 5340 .402 LOST TIME = .076 4783 1 . 052 1.000 - 1.052= -.052 VIC = TOTAL CRIT. VOL./TOTAL CRIT. CAP. = 1.056 o. It1 ) I 'Z.- 0 ~ OUTBOUND (I 4278 636 2661 ADDED TRIPS 003 () 3 () 000 o 30 4 ADJ./ ADJ. C. CAP. LANE GIC -. ()2 .387 2026 -.013 .154 464 0 0 0 -. ()2 .382 2040 4530 I 8 = -7 X10**-3 LEVEL OF SERVICE = F 1 N{ J ,(.L,(i~1 !~I\.i e.flffi n~M '.l rlW!::1: l' ,,;; 0 ~ r. I7!tA~ Hol.'t:. -... ~7 - - ,"P ~ ~ \\~\ ~ \\,'V ~ A."".. CAV3 .; p~~~ ~ ~,) ql.$. 1, ~n j'l.'$ t~7,; J ~~ ~ ~,,~;.; ~&,~ :: "'7 J ~~~ 3~ ~"\~I ,\'31- 4-- --b z::- 't/,13 11 ~t: ~ 137~ ~ ,1~ - 137{-<: . gL( ~ 1.)~ 1., --- .,.- ~~, 4-- v/t.,,- 11~ \\,\ -,. r V Ie.. ~ ,0'-' ~'J.I~ r ~O~ ~ C, LO$~ D ~x IS,11>i f1 1- 111\ I\..:\ \ n> r.<f (/ .., I ':.'1-/ "\.,1 ...~ ~ ... 1" Ii t c.<' '/'} :: 11~1 :::::-t~~1 a--- , .r- 1'\<- 're- II (pI ~71~ ~ . <64 V/6 ~ ,~~ Lo~ ~ D t'-lS. \lIlif t AV11lo ~ Plto.J~t1' l'P' D . - tX191' -t APP'D .r ~~G1l" H" M'~N ;' 1 N(.j ~l,;i~'f 'uN GA!l\I'\\!:N -g ;.jl~J.J q '5>13 O,:..r; 17~~~ Ho~'(" P'rn ,1' I I~"\I. 1'\'1~~; )~,~~ ~ 3Lfs~ ~ it! I 't,1 ~ I ~13% r 1..11{,,< ~ So4/. ~ .J~L.~ = 19'71 J~~4~ ; ; 'L ':::' -. \ (, ~~ I ~~ 6--- \1~" \~t;1/$7i!' I. of, ~ 4-- ~l.) ~ 11\ \1' ~ """-- \ 1)71; ,{. ---.. 4.-- ~ --... / V!c/-LOf4 r ~~ V Je. -; /. 7,/ ,,,11 ~ ~ }~\c.; ,1,1- -. r r- "- ~o~ f ~o~ f ~x IS,11>i f1 (,~ I 1-1">\ j }. l,.. l l'P' D tfYZ/> to tlY% +- ~6%_ ~ IL 1~A77( V I (, ~ 1.7, L lo~ r 'J,'~ --- --'I> ,-;\ ~ ~ \,\4oz, 6-- _..1 r~O"\ tll$ \1Il6t t A V111 D ~ PItQJ~t1' tx I -t A 11' I D ., l'toJ~Gf l' H" M'~ N Appendix B 'BAFFlC comrrs S01JB.CE: George Nolte & Aasociate City of Campbell. , . , WUson & Porter Ba.giDeeriDg .- ~ LnlLLL tVLUlU L .:H,,,;.U,Hrtl'\l LoeA TION_~o 92. WIN<::'H~TE.R w~ HH~lE}.JDJ4 :--.... ~- : ~ H ~ ~ (1 i (1 ~::1 ~j2(il1 03li[i 8 4 ~=i ~:1 ~35~3ti [1 6~) ~:1 ti7tlt1 ~:i ~:; ~) (1 ~a9Ci0 1 ~:i ~J (i i i ~j ti 12Citi 13~j(1 i 4(1(1 15~:i0 i6C1(1 i 70~3 i ::~ C1 (1 19(;~:i 2ti~3ti 21 ti~:i 220(1 ( 23titi 2 4. ~=i ~:i 4t: -..,15 . I ; ~.i. 9:: :-'-. ; ;..,.._, .i -' .-.:.. - I_I -, C' I I z.:.... _i, l , , _1_' ~'_.t: _ ~:i t: . I .; '- _: 1_ 2':15 "3 i 1-1 _ tit, .:4, ..:.~.:.i .::: :::i 1 ::' ;:: '-' i37 ::":::i9 ::::~,2 .-71_' .11_1 ;c7(1 itA ::::7~ 2~,l ~7 r- I . I j~j(1 '7'71 _I._, J. ::..:94 ':'(1:-: :;;.." . _: '-' ;..... .. . :....;. ,- - ," I . -= { ::. -: ;;,! :=: "7 :. "-' '-' '-" ~ '-oi ~ ':: -' :..; "-j- 1 ~:i ~~ ~:: t i 31 1 :=l5::: lCi66 1207 i 33t: 1 i ~7 :. ~ '-' '-' -. --:.- .-; .':.'~ ;:;!oJ 1 "._1 :. :::_" .... . ~--:~ ~: { ...:: 294 16331 ., ~. . '._1 ,~ " '- 1 f 19 1 (1 , , ... -' '.' : ~.-.: ~:: 1 : ~ - , . q -' :. - '- -;..::. '- -' ~3 i.:- t1 tl 1 '-; : :.:.:3....' . 'I 1 " ,-. ~t. _I .... ~._II ::::24 ..: tr ~ 24 _1 '7 ,- _' =- "_I Co: : ::i:4 . .. - . 3~ ~ .... , - -' .:::5 . , - - .:..' ,::' ::..: ... I j ::: .~; ; ""'111 .':1'- i ~ i .:,,~! 2 _ :'04 :.>3 = ?5,:: -.. .:.; .: _: 1 -- ' ~0; 197 Ij~ _~ 14 : \ ~~33 i2i i ~-1 - 1 ~- .I. t' _, 14i i i 9 ::1 ~:) i52 i "7 i .:. - .:. 1 1 rOt ~,r .- ... :1 ( ~ 4 _ DJ RECTION-1ifa- - r.. \' lHICLl VULU[\'1l ~Ul\lr\lAKY tOeA TIONlJ o. 9LJ WJN/HE:~TER lJ/'?HAC.IEND~ Ci 1 ~~1 ~=1 ~3 2 ~=i ~=1 .-, ~ ,'-..- ~J .~: t1 ~J ~=i 4 ~i ~3 ~J 5 ~J ~~i tl 6 ~=i ~=i ~J '7 ~:i ~:i t1 ::: ~:i l1 ~:i s [1 ~i 1[1 ~:i ~:i 110~:i i 2 ~::i ~:i 130~3 14(1(1 150(1 1 6 ~:i ~:i 1 7~3tl 1 ::; ~3 ~:i 19(1(; 2 ~:i ~3 ~:i 21titi 22ti~3 230ti 24(10 5~j i~ ~) 1 156 224 2117 22(i . I' t.' ~~::: 3i3 2:::9 264 3~:14 " ,": '.) ( .:.:. ~55 7/"! 245 1.97 13 :3 i -i 1. .i. ": _.' .i. ,_; I_I ::::~1:::: '::17;7 ;:.. ,"_, ._1 2i2 :._1 :..1 ~i :::(4 3i4 2:::9 295 4..::;4 oJ I ..: ,_; .i. ,_I ::' '::' (:1 :"-:'-'-' 1 t.;:; ~ ,,- ...; , ~'-r ;':4 ___ 126 .; ..: .!. .:. ~ q:7; ~j t: -: .; ."; ,.. L J. C'..:: .; '...-.- - -- '-' .1 .~~: ;' ::; i :::: .:,::-~ - -:.....-. i ('( 15 t:i ; "-;: .,..:.: .. 1-; .1. I:. :::. :1' 9 i ~:i :::9 .; .= -:: ~ -.' : ;::. .:: '"i' .:: -:: ..; .' . .~ "t _ :.' i ':' ':' '.1 .;'_. ,J :..,....: ._1 ':-: __,' '..1 '-i i '- -' .. '.,J ..' :_1 ~: :_= ...., " . 1_: '..',; '-, "l' .' i ':= : I ': _' i. :_ i ,i ..:~ -i ,-' .... ,'; '-. .-.-.~ -.'~ .: -' -' '-' '_: :"-: ," ~; ~: ~:~ : :: .. -, ..; ,-;;:: .: J,":': . ::0: ' ~'_:'_: .' . :- '-' . II t. ~:_I' ; 35,~ : .';'- ~:". : -::,-..: : "::l-':!:,: " , '_: .l. .:. .-:-: :-: : " ~ : ~ 1. f :.. 3' ;:,- ,._i i " DI RECTION .s /PJ F LOCATION N. o.7n W'NO". 5/0' .BlJDD ( -: .": :.:1": : ~:"'::.': 1 ~:~.:.i ~j ; :.... :.': T.' ; : : ~ : 1" : ; :-; !..: :'.1 ':: :1'::,,: : ,":":1"; '._1 L.i V~ ~.; :;:: lli~.:.i ",..l ",..J i..i t."! '- '-- '-' '-' ( :::: .:.; li~.:.i ::::: 4. ~-:-i f"1 -1::' - .- - . . .:.:..- .l ...., .i.~':l ~.:~ .:.: 9 , ~ , , \. ~~'1 :11 - .... i .i. .l ,- ~ , . ; 1 ! , ,~ .. a:- _i '! . I ,l' :. I t:"""":' ... "_, .. 1 t:::: I., II l. .-. - ~, ~~~~) i97 1 t:.4 -, ~.. - j ~_ i i _4.1. i?5 .; -',- .i.. ! _i _~(i j 4-::: 1 1 ~:.~ 5 ~3 -,.. _I '- .- "3 ~ r1 ; . I .I.':'" ..:;9 .1 '- ....- ':' .:. =: / :~-: Ci -; ~:92 I ." I:: I :..;. ~- '. .'~ e_ ': '- . : .i ,_I'::' ;:.f -' , _ -:: i 5~':'J 1,- f.: i .. J. ._1 I 157 i 9~~: . Ie:-":- .- "_, _.1 2(1:"': 21 t: 16""' ~ 1 ~~ ~(1_,-i ; - '..; ..L. '- _." .; - "', 1. "_I.:. \ ~ _ .l. _ 1:_ 9-:. i~); lit:1 ir1t. r1~ ." .; "'!1. 3.:' Sib . ~ J. _ _ i (i ~ i ~t~ i,t. i : ~. i95 :::::~j - ::':~.:.i _ ~t.i- ~~a:.:. .i.': :~ ~ 1 _i j, i ~:i :." Si 01 RE(:TIO~~ Sb " . ~t._ 1 t: ~ t:: 2 (~t 11 '0, :_1 s:. :...t ..:; (:t LOCATION Nt) 75 \N'JAU)..J ~/~ BUDD ~~i j ~j ~J -: '.::.-: L; ; ," I":l"': ...; .-. .-. .-. ; '-f =",1 ;"" :::: ~:-i ~7i ~:-i ~ ,_I l"_: :"'_~ / :~ .i.. ,__ _ : 1 ~-=1 2_0 ; - -' -_.:.... ~ _ tl ..: ~J '-i I' .: _~a:.... ; - ~I 1 :1 ~ .;.. 1:1 .1 ,_: '_I ; - - .i.:.... :1 - ~ .... ::: 5 -~ 49 :s- ~~ 0 i ...5::; ., 1'_ i I I _1 .:: t,i : ~~ '-, ::; 1."1; -.. , ~ iIo... : _ ::~19 ~~ i 4 _: oJ' _._1... ~. _14 1 tIt: :::t: 1 '_ I 9i -: l-:~': : ~,;:;/ .. . .. .. .. . i ,-' '..of i.., :-~ .. ..... ----.- i.:.... ; '.1 .i.':'" .-, ~ i i ,_I .- i '. .' i ~ '_: i :: ::; , .:......i. ;:... ~ - ,2 _ (i : ':11-: ---- ..J ,4' _ .:.... _: z:... .. L~' : ~ I , , ;..._ fo':' Ii::" .:- :=~ :3 ~; ! l. ,; '"l' ," .~ I : ':~ " .; I- ll... ':1 ;::: , , , .:. .::; ~-1 , . , _ l ~ I ., 11'1 l: 1__ 1~ :.' ~~1.:.. ~(i::: :,.! ~ '-.l -: ..: "'':! ..I c:: ..:::~~ . I ;;- i ~ :' ~-:-i -; . ~ ~ . - .-. - ... 9~i -- , , .:t 1._ 4 ~.:1 .:....~ 01 RECTIO~ ~ ,...1 ,-, I:' -, ..:. 5 N ,Ix , LOCATION \"VIN{K. S/fJ HA(/~/IITJ~ N,,,", /~~: 7' 01 RLCTIO~ N.i? i . . - _. - , "I ,": :." :_~ .. i C~ C-.: -: .0: ;.;:": : ~:",::",' .. ,"I...;..; : , ':"'1:"': : .' ~'i t.; ~'i '.: ': L~:.-i ..:.. .i. 1"'_: l"'_~ .:. ;1'::": .- ," :"": ~.: :.- -- '-" "-' . I .' I .I ~ ..: ." . ::-:1": :.. ,- .- .:., :.1 _: .'; Li Li :,;.,., -r T_l l"'_: .. , - - 0 - :.. M .i. .:... 0 . - . j i - .i. - ::1 - . . - , ..., ..... - , . . . - - 0- :..; ;::- - , ::.; ; 4 - - 0 .i. 0 0 - , ~; f-- ~ f- , - . . .:... , 0 - - - - 0 - , . - , ~ , t=- o - .i. fo':''! .:... . - 1 .i. .- - - - i ,- 4 i ,; ; 0 .i. .:... 0 tt ..... .:.;.. .i. -=+ i . ~ ; .=; Lf ;::- ;::- - , J .i. - . i . ; 4 ~ ' . i - - i 0 .i. - , ,_I .:... .i. t. , o. , - - - - 1 4 - i ~! 9 i '~ -.., i ,. :_, .i. .i. - -' . i '~ 0' 5 tl i ; 0=- j ;::- -. - - J. -;- . - - - ; tr 1 to ..., ;::- - r: .i. - .i. - - - i tl to i tl , i 9 1 t: .i. 0 - 1 ; 5 .:- ; . 0 - . ~.:.i to .i. ~I .:... .i. ,;" .:... ., , ; ,. , 1. 9 ;::- - , i ;::- 0 .i. .:... - I .;.. ~.:.1 .. . , j -.., ; -. 1 . i 0 .. , 1 1 ::.;. . .i. '- , - - ; .- ..:; ;::- i - . .i. .1 i .1 .:... _. .i. .:... .:... . 0 1 . ; i 4 ; - - . -=+ . -l ... - J. .i. - - 9 ;= , 9 9 j - - . , o. !:; , o. ~ tl t- - =--! - f- .. - , - , - - - . ~ ;::- _. ~ . ~ I . - - - . . - - .. (; - t, .i. '"t ..... .:... LOCATION No/z"Z. W1N(U. ~//J HAr.'/E.Nf/i9 DIRECTION o ~': :...:- ~. i :- . ~~~ ::' ~~) ~:J ~'1 f-: ~"j ~'i :-"; , !-"; F1 .. =::.; ::: =-':"1 !-.:.: ~.:.i j t.i ~.:1 il~~1(i i'::: Ci D',! ~ ~ '-' '-" i 7:7.;!-::: .. '-' '-' '-' ..; .: .-, .-, ; ~ L,: L.: .. : '-' '-' 1 ~! ~J ~.:i 1 t: t.? ~.:.1 1 ? ~:1 ~:i 1 ~:; ~:i ~:i 19~:i(i 2 fi ~:::i ~:i 2 i (it1 ~ ::: ~.:.i ~.:.i "..: .:: L'1 L.i ~ "-"-"-' :;::~t1~.:1 . ,;:: L... _: i .':' 54 i . I.:.. 1 _ i - .:: .:.; .... . .I. ! '_ _I "! .:.. _.I. ,_, i9::' i :-; ~J : ; i _J. .l. 2~4 .... - ~ .:.;. _.i- _ .i. i ~ l::' '-' 1 ,", '"t "' .i. II: j it:, 15.;- i fool :=; 11~1 ; I I .; i :-I~ : tr i i ~ i ( f - ~. I : _,_'I_I ?(12 1 ~5 i.:.:;. : : ri \ 1_1_: i14 t.t. t:~j . , _II: .. ., , 1:1 i .:.; -:! "' .... .i. , i .' .I.':'" to to ~::1 ~ '.1 ,A' .:... ,_I '.:. ii_I " i 1 l.':: i (:"i - .a. "_" _ '" i .i .: i. i59 i i ~ ~~J ~ , l : I 1 ::;t:: is .:...t.. ~I:: - O. - - - i _ - .;. - ;;... 25 ~. ;,.': :'.1 :' : ~ '?1::':=: I:.' ." ::::C: ( 1 ~'i :-~ l-:i /~.:i ::: :... .'.~ .:.I""T .-: 'I I: ;...:. : ,-. ~ ~:~ j. .: .: .- 1 =-+ r:: ~ :7-i:;'-!::: .:: .;. :"_:l_:._:~ .:...- i ~ '.. 1 ::: l ... '+ tr .., .... !7; '-' ~ 1 '- .a. "_I .. ,-,: ~r':'i , .... of i::" 1 _= 'f ... : -. '- , _ ._i 1.4 of . ~-: 1 !" () i ::;.:~ 1 : ~ ~:~ ....IC1(.~ . I; l. 1-' ..: i ~4~ -r.oi .. ":--rL.i- - ....;:.. -........ ,. , .1 a..r.: :4 ji- ,0 -,C' i _ o ~4 olB I b ::> ~ z o - J- &3 Cf) 0:: W J- Z - ~ '" -1 '" ~ o ~ Q ~ :S g G ~ ~ 3 ~-; .c( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ % -= 3- _~ t=: a: Z-~CI) o ~ C ~ - o::a: tiLLloi Otihi~ 9cQ::a: .-L... ( -, \..-J ,...... ---.!I (-:;J:-l.~ L ~l~~ ~ ""1;,J ).c ~ r("\ I l-~ ,r) ~!.t-:.~ I.O:_I->r 1'1 !)NIQN3 3Wn10^.~H "'1 1'1101 t; ~~ 10 a:: ~ ffi 10 crj It: &&. 10 ~ ~ . ~~ ~ 0:: ~~ ~IO crj a: -OJ t:"':!\ . . &&. ~ --I % ~~ ~e a:: ~CD \ ;-1 crj Z-.:- i:O.J i= OZO:: z k3 a:: O~ ~.- . ~m ~1{-1 (f) o (I) ~ 1'-' a:..) · &&. j [0 --I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9r-* ~ ~ ;; '(g ~ :-- - "^ - '^ ~;t\:...:..,...N """ --.:} i'\- ')Co ...J ~ :-' ~ ~NNN -" c ~ N " - ,..l - \~ - ....", ._;::;... ~~~~~::;:::':'\0 ~ ~ <::lO ~ ~ :=:: :=: .!: "" '" ==-~ ~ "" N \- ~ N_, 1)10 0 ~ - -::r- -:r - . ~ _ t'C" ~ :::r ~ rt" =r ;:#:;'~~~~ie~~ ~~::~~~~o-~ .9. N ~ .:2 IV' ,-!" =r \ , ,~ ~ ...1 '.1' -::';- ')( ; \ - ,)<: ',"-. ,I', ~ ~ Q :::t'" -::lO ..j _ <:r ::. 11\ ~ \.1'\ r-1;!: '.\\ U'" g, U'" ~ ~ ;:: 000 ~ g ~ g ~ ~~. ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ - (/) z ::> -- ~ :..:> IjJ 'f) a:: .LI ~ Z - ~ -~ -.J ~ ~ ~ .5 ~ Cl: ~ i ~ i ~ -iiii -:3 ~ ~""'a: Z - LIJ en o-3c~ - a:a: ~liJOi UtifrlLIJ 9cQ:a: .-L.... ~-, ,- - , \.. ..) ,...... '::4 :J ~ j ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ':! ..., ~ ~ d -;:, _r .} "" ~:. :; ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ J: ; , <t. ,. ~ ~ fa. ~ ~Ig ~ ~ (:iIXx~ L 4f~ ~ ~~. ~ ~ ~!~~ II~I~r . I 1"1 f>NIQN3 3Wn'O^.~H "'1 '~lOl "::. Iii ~~ 0 a:: ~ffi 0 crj a: L\. 0 ..J t;z . 150 @ c:: ~ :E CD:I"""\ · o~ ~:v (jj a: ~ L\. :SfG..J ~ ~ -..3 _-S.. \{'\ o~)~::t"' - N ~ ~ N"""'- .;;:... ~ ..... "" <<' no- ~ - N <:l 0 -::r- '" V" ~. ~ ~ IY' "" I"- 1)0 ~ ~ DC 0Cl ')0 <Xl ;; ~ ~ .:::r .:::::::. - ::: 2 a ;: - - - ~ ~ ~ '-l\ _ '\(\:r- ~ "'" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0- ~ no- % B z e 0:: ~ :;: ~ ;::.. ~ ~ ;;:. :::: cnOtJ ~CD ~A crj ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Zi~..J - - -- FE ~ zO 0:: ZOr)) ':>> . ~CD ~;O en oU) 310 % If jG~~~ i~ ~ ~ 9 r- ~ ~ .~ '3'" C> no- '3"'" :r.~o~_~~- ~~;:5~~~~cr- en ~ ~-foI','i\ ~~ ~~N'-~_" 0 --- ~ ~ ~ ,~, ~ o o V" 0 \/"\ 0 "'"' 0 ~R~~~~ ~....-I~ .-l~.-l I I I I I I 0\/"\0 \.("'~\.("' ~~ R ~ t'-~ ....., .-l .-l .-l ~ .-l '1\ ~ '-I ~~ ~O ~I- 0:. ~ :::;) . - if) z ~; 1-'3 s .:;:: :..:>~ W3 ~ 'f) ~ a: O:::~-:~~ J..J Ei w t5 ~ I- 0 ti fd tIJ Z 9ca:a:: ...... ''":...1 ~. /"' ;.::0 :: .: ~ a: ~ 3 ~~ ~ - .-L... ,-, 1 ",'- r \... ~ ,..... ~ L ... ::; --- (crl ""y ~ ' rJl~ )-< ~H ~ ~-:rt ~~!A~ ----, (~T -l:~)rW I --- . II 1"tJ !)NIQN3 3Wn'O^.~H "" '~lO.l ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 'X .~ "" -,~ -- ":-:- .'""'-..\ ..., -...,...... ':"f'. ......-. --.J ,~'"\ ',) ,........ -- ~ ,(\ V"-. ""- - ~r~ '"\0 :Y\ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ii; ~z · ~o_@O:: "~ :::l ~ffi ~ €l (fj ~ S- a: - . Lr.. @--1 ~ .1"\ ~ ~ ~ ~ --~.~ J\ :::"'-> ,:s- f'l ~ "7"';- ': -.,.. QCl \(\ ~ ":!: ~ .'::!:: 2, ~ ~ ~ r:r-. t;z i50 ~~~~~- ~"v ~ ~ - ~ \.."- en <:;~ · ~~]!~ en ~ ~ a: ~ . . ~ :iIG --I ~ & <c{J ........ ~ N'.::::r- ~ -- '''"- - - - ::::r- r:::- .--.. ~ -, ~ ~ ~ (.:J ,~s: -- ~ C ".r-. % ~z e ~ ~ cnO"l ii:_ · ~en ~I~ en ~ S2Z3 It ; ,9..J \"'- ~ -- ~ '':::fll. ~ ~". ~ cs- \.,() <::r- ;:) ~ N <s- ~=:~;i"~::!~ ~ ~ no. "" .s - :!: ~""" ~ '..0 F= ~z !G a: ~ ~ zo ~ D. , ^ "" N'\ :em~o \J~ ~ ~ 0U)3 ~ 'e · ~ 3---1~ - """ :::~ o N a - ~ ~ ~ ~. o ~ '() ~ ~\.r $~ ~ ~ ::r ::r i=i.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;p. ~ 't..\ ~9 ~~ :.J ~ o I- ~ -:r- ..t"\ ~ ~ N' i~~~~!~~~~ gr-~~~~~~~~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I l.~ DNION3 - 0 ~ ~ e- ~ - V>< ~ ~ =- N 3~n'O^.~H ....) ':"- '" ::r- ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ,,\f 1\110l. ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ \r ~ - ~ N ,.t'\ n- ..s r.; ~ \{\ \f\ b ~ Ii; ::> ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :...g ~ (2.. tn <: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - :: ~ - ~ \(\ -; - ..;=; ...;;. - - ~ ~ ~ ~m~ - u) ;: \J' ........ ~ -....). f"C" 1:)C cs- <=J ..,c ~ o"'~ ~ M'"I - - .Q. Z ~ ~ a: ..;: . LL i@ ~ N ~ e- ':r 0 ~ <0 be) -.so =- ~ ~ Ill. ; - ~ ~ ~ l- i tiZ , ~ frl . .::; &50 ~ c:: ;::r ~ 0::- ~ - ~ \I"\ 3 ~ - t-.l '-f'\ ~ fJ) a: :Em~ - en z ~ CI) <:J \:Po =- ~ "^ ~ 0:: ~ a- rC" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O~~ 0 C W - a: a: a:: 'I 8 LL ~ .- ~ . LLJ 0 i <:J ......) -::r 0 &- ::::r- CS"'- ~ ~ ~ . I- ti fd 9 L&J Z c a:: a:: % - ~~. e ~ .Q ~ ::= ~ ~ S!: 0- ~ &' 't\ u) ~ ....... ,tj: I@ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <5"" ~CD~ ::::! r("> ~ .....L... N :..- -- ~ I_\ ~z~ - .J ~ <:> ~ \[\ ~ - I \J ~ = ~ ~ ::r- ~ '-~ ,..... i= a:: i6 0: >$ ~ ~ l::!'"' . ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ OZ ~ ~ ~ \.{\ f', ~ ZOi ~--- L ~ Ie en ~ ~ ~ ....J (<:rI~Ir-) . - ~CD~ . ~ N ~ - = S:! ;r ~ ('/'\ \P ~,~ - - - - oU)~ a: - ...i :3 Ie ~ s: <0 ~ ~ - >-< ~ \f\1 ~ ~ 0 ~ ....s. \f\ ~ '-fI '\.0 ~ ~ IN~ ~) >--l :r: -. l~ !r.'-- i ~~ w ~~ L.I'\ g ~ 0 LI" g LI" 0 L.I'\ g ~ ~ ~l'"- ~ (oI;:]:~) r - 0 ;:: ~ 0 - :.J >,J:i >,J:i ~ ,..... ;..... co co . co co ;2. --- ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~i '" \\. I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ 9 - 0 LI" ;= L.I'\ 0 \.J"\ ~ L.I'\ 0 \.J"\ $ ~ 01 - I- 0 - -=- g ;:: -=- 0 ..../ - ...0 ...0 ~ ...0 r-. ,..... co co co ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I I I I I I I I 1"1 DNION3 " N :: ~ ::> '--J ,.... ;- - 3Wn'O^.~H r\-. "..... '<'"" ~ ...:. .:,..,... r- I ."...., '" N N ;::, <:-.l ~ ~ N ~ ':.1 ,fJ ':r" "'1 '~lOl ~ tJ'3 N <::A '-.JI ~ :; ::r 'b \..{\ \..f\ ~ ~ t'- ;- :::r- Ii; I:::::> ~~ I@) c:: ..,0 ~ ~ '-C\ r ') ~ ,~ "" ....... :i ~ .::!"'" \(\ ~ '\j~' """ :r ~ ....... ~ !<3 u) :!m- :r ~ "i ~ UJ~ ~ :r- ~ -, ~ - -:::- .:; o ,~ 12 ~ ~ a: . -:..J , LL. @ .....J -SI <0 ~ N ~ '^ n-. ~ ~ 2 ~ ::r "'" '" N'> 0 .-.e - ~ ~ "31- If- ~ ~ tnz frl ~ ~ . ~ 150 e e::: ~ ~ ~ ~ N'. :r 0 \f' 3 IU) 3. ::::. - ~ ~ ~CD~ u) zr= en e 1:10 -' .~ Q ~ ..J\ s:: ~ 10:: ... ~ - N 0:; c ~ o~~ - - a:: a:: ~ W ti a:: ~ . 0 i LL. ' -. 0 ~ ~ "" ~ ~ <::) w . ~ ~ ..0 ~ ,J"' f- u ti ~ '..r\ ~ ~ 9 w Z c a: % - ~z, ~ c:: ~ 0 \0 :r ~ \1' ~ 0 ~ cnO ., e u) ~ ~CD~ ;;:. ~ :;: ~ ~ ~ ~ "'"' .-L... '" ~ ~z' - .= =- / _\ .: - ..J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" .~ -.... - I I\;J ....A \() ~ ;;;- '- ~ .... i= a: 16 c:: N ~ 1(\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, - oz ~ " N '::s- ~ .:::: ZO<:lj ~ --- L ~CD~ IA CJj N .0 ~ -:r ~ ~ (~~ 001 r} . , ~ ~ I'r ~ "'" ~ '" <:r "'"' t4" 2 ~f~~ - N ~ N N O(l)~ - - N a: :::. Ie ..J """ ~ )-ll ~ \l\ LL. :3 \1"" r- ~ \l'\ 0 ~ :r- ~ ~t - ~!~~ ~ W ~ :J(~I~I~r V"'\ ~ \J'" 0 V"'\ g \{"'I 0 .... ..J ...-l ~ 0 ...-l ~ 0 ~ ~ '-D '-D C'- C'- t'- co ~ ~ ...-l ...-l ~ .-I ...-l .-I .-4 .-4 I J.- I I I J.- I J.- ~' - 0 ~ V"'\ 0 ~ ::::I 0 9 r- 0 ...-l ..:T 0 ~ ~ ~ '-D '-D '-Q '-D C'- c--. ~ ...-l ...-l .-4 .-I .-4 .-4 .-4 .-4 . 1'tJ ~NlaN3 , -::- '~f\ - , ~ '="'" 1""" N'- ~ <: !'~ :3~n'O^.~H ~ ~ ~ - -- ~ - ~ - "'tJ ,\f101 - ;: ..c q - ~ IX) ':) - n- "'" "..... -3> rt"' (r -:r '(\ \[' '..(j =- --" ~ t; ::::J f'1. ~~ @) cr= ",.ro- 1- 4: It' ....,;) 'w'\ ~ ~ ,\,('. ~ ::r -=s- ~ .".:. :::- ......... - - ;j) ...... .~ 2m~ - cri ....) ~ :r- .,.f'. ~ (..:) - ::r - ~ - a: OIJJ~ - - ~ - - ~ -' ~ a: 2 - Z ~ . ;;z LL. @ -I ~ ...:l '\!\ " ~ '-::f" ~ ~ ::.t. :::r .;;:) () ~ '"" ..-r- ~ ~ 3 - ". ~ -r - 4 -~ t- ~ .t t;z ~ ~ . ~ :50 e c:: ~ ,..,). LiJ ... 0 *"' ::r- ~ ~ 0 - ~ ~ .,r-- - :: J) ..... ~ a: 2m ':1 - cri u::: z-=- L&J en (QQ1 0 ~ \l' :I" l;C"\ :::r- ~ ~ o ~ ~ o~~ - - 0 - eJ.J - a:: a: a: ti - ~ LLJ 0 i LL.. iG - ~ ::;- ~ ~ ~ ~ 'l" . ~ - ~ t- u ti ~ - 9 L&J z: C a: :J: - ~~~ ~ 0:: ~ 0 :l:'" \'l'- -5-- ~ 0 ~ "" $'I '-f' .....) ~ A N - :!CD~ Ie cri ('\. ~ ~ :: ~ ~ ~ - ~ ...L.... "" N - ~ - - - .::... - fZ; - -,'" '<' e .J -..)r. \ ~ f ~ ~ ~ V\ ~ ~ ~ ~-~ I - \[\ ::r '- ~ ,.- i= a: <3 a: a '" "N ~ r'" ~ ~ oz 00 u ~ ~ ..,.... ~ ~ "'" :::r- - zo -1--- L >oj en . (~~I~ '. ~ G &- ::r ~ - ::r ~ 2CD~ . ~ <:> :s:- ~ rf'~ .:r ~ -..!) t::S"" ~ 0- cr- t<' oCl)~ - a:: ~ :G . n- >-< ~\(\ LL.. :; -I ~ ~ ~ ~ .,p -!) \.I' \X' ~ ~ ~, - - - - - ~!~~ a.' i '.>/~ W ~ U"'\ U"'\ :~ I (S<I~I~r U"\ ~ 0 g 0 U"\ g U"I ~ ~ - 0 ;::: ;:: 0 - .:r --- ~ >.D >.D ~ ..... ,.... co co . co CX) ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , I I I I I I I I I I I 9 - 0 U"'\ ;: U"\ 0 U"'\ g U"\ 0 lJ'\ ~ ~ 0 r- 0 - .:r g ;::: .:r 0 .... -.0 -.0 ~ -.0 ;... ..... CX) CX) CX) ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >- o,~ :::>' 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ CJ)~ ~n:L Zl~ ~-! 0' '- tt 0 - t# W ~ ~ :: " -a: .~ ~; \oJ => W! .~ ~ ~ CJ)!) · . ~ a: o:::/zo -;- ILl _::rC W !c(w~ t- I 0 !c( frl Z 90n:: - V\ ~O) .- z ~ () ,~~ .~ \i' ~ 1 , .l ..1\ ~ : ~ ~ $ ~ 't i Q ~ ~ ~ ~ CI)~ ~ ~ a: .. <{~ :! ~ w (/ , n:u '" <II ..,. '" ~ ~ .;;> :J: '; ~J?:J (/) ~ crt{!~ 1 E~;r 1 - E::.I~Il")) r-- -' CI) ::> I .- '~ -1-1 ~-I oc:{ ~ In .. f--: ~ Wz . ~o~@c::= <S ~ffi i ~ (fj a: ~ . 1!- \I) @ --1 - r- 'G \Q ,.J 0\ :r V\ C) Q:) N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ CD Q) ~ ~ ~ r-!::tl) ~ (j;) ~ 00 V. ..a - - ~: f--: 00:: au) . 0--1 :I: ."~~~ ~ c. .. . f'J .~ OoZ';@O:: CI) V\ q . ~m~@ CJ) oz .~ fE ) 6 -.J ~ '-Y~ co "1-7 t- CI) <(z wo ~m 03= 0:: 1!- t't) '", ^ -0 ~ ,v, ,.-. - ~ N .. ~ - rJ :I: t- o: · oZJ00::~2 zo-+. II) . ~m~B en -. ~ oCl)~ - 0:'- · 1!- ) 18 --1 ") Zw2 Q r- t:r~ o.c=.. 0,- LJl ...J I- I ~ :r-r--~~<o - I / ::r-" I.r)- 1:1) -......, '-D -..... N ",.... ,.,.. ^'" . .... :r- '--' ~ -.~ ,..... --- ,.. ('oJ :--' '.. ---. ~<<)....._ N l.t' ,.-. c.~ (\'I r N ":) f' - ""'..0 ,,\ N -.- - --..... '- --- r- --..' '" In'~r-~ ~ 'J I'll N 2 ~:l~~-b ~ rJ ~ '" ~ ,.., ,~c - ". t'- ..0 ~-~, ~ ~ IW\ - ..a - - - - - r- _::r 1- -,,,- :::.. U) -:;- () .:::. '0 .. - - f'J .-;;i -_ - ~ - ~ / I Lt\ (:) - ~ r- r- ~~~~~~~ r- U) G.) Q) a;) ~ 0\ -. ~ ~ o ..... I I ~ ~ I , I I \ g lr\ M .....,8 ~ ~ ~ g r- r- r- t ,1 Q;:) Q) tJ:) Q) ~ -2 ;l ~ :::J · .J. - ~ V) ~ '\ et: ~ ~ ~ T ~ J Y< ~ ~~ " I '1:. a: 0::: ~F ~ ~ 5l&J~ '7 9 ~ ~ - - ~ (\~ J<)., ~ '^ ~ ~ -j -::;: ~ ,;. J? ~ ~ ~ 7 )C ~ en ~:' Q: ~ i~ . LrJ 0 0:: ....L... 1:_, 1 ,- r '- ~ .,.... ><. ~ ~ ~ lI-XJ1 I~T~~, t~ ~~ I~ ! 1- ~ i. eI_Iyr VJ lV ~NlaN3 3Wn'O^.~H ,,\f '~lOl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \)Q -~ N ~ __ (J" -:::::> a "'" ~ ~ ..... ,..} r:- -> <:::. c \'r--. ~-' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cr- o:J' ......) ~ 'f' "" t- r- ~ ~, t; ~~ ~[G 0: .> ~CD ~i~ ,^ oUJ z:'-" U ~ a: ~ . La.. V) @ ...J .Q ~ - if" rJ'. \S' ~ -....). ~ n-(S"' -0<:> :::r- - r^~ \l' ~ bO tiz ~O GO:: eu) 0--i 2CD O~ a: LL. :J: ~z ~ 0: ~ ~ cnO ~ - ~ :ECD ~A cri 2ZJ- It ; ~...i ~ :ro~ ~"'^ ~ ~~~,!,::J-=- ::r- ~ ~ tt- ? ~ "':] ~ ~ ,"" 0() Q ~ "" ~ \J'\ ~ :::r ~ ~ ~ ~ "-&...;; ~ ~.~ ~ ~ c:s- ~ rt- :::: == ~ ~ a- \i' i= 00:: Z 0,...J ~ M- .::r- ~ -::r - ~ ~. ~ LL ~ - :r :r ~ "", ::::- \'" zo- ~ .- , ^ N ~ ....s """;;' -:r \.i' 1'<3" ~ CD ~'-~ (-) \J I :;-. ~ CT" ~ -.ll ~ ~ :~ o (I) :l; - tJ'.. ~ <;<' C \""'"'0 C ,,- '-" a: 'J · / I La.. 3(3...J o ~ ~ \.l" g~1;~~~~~~ gl-~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ o ... l'f:/ fJNION3 3~n'O^.~H "'1 '~lOl b t; I::> l.L ~~ 0:: ..;;: 0 tn ':u ~ -:z -;W ~ E . ~ 2m 0 C/) a: olJJ Z ~ ~ a: . ~ ~ 0 -.J 0 -+ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ""- tnz i &3 ~ g . :50 e 0:: ,0 '-f' I ~ -:r- \('\ ~ - - ~ ~ - -3 ~ \:7"" 'J) a: ~m~ en ~ en ie 0:: z=- lAJ o .~ ~ O~'E 0 a: a: ~ L1.J - a: tiLtJ ~ . 0 i . ~ ~ Ie .- ~ Ut:i ~ c LLJ Z 90 a: % - ~~ e 0: ~ n- ~ '" u ~ ""'" ~ 00 ~ ~ - cri ~ - ~ cr- ~m~ ~ . ~ ...J.... {--,\ ~z~ - ..J 1 - - I , "'" \... ../ ..... i= 0:: %. a: e i~ L OZIj , u ZO'" D ___ ~ en ~ 0- I is (5""I~ry ., - cs- 2a:)g r~1 . r N" "'" 4f~, '" ~ ... <:-l' =- =r- oC/)- - a:: -- e ..J ~ 00 \0 I ~H ~ ~ u - - ~ ~ ..,.3 ~ - l'- - - l~ if' / ~~ ~! ~ ~ / :,LI_IJr w U"\ g ~ 0 U'\ g U'\ 0 U"\ g U'\ ~ ~ - 0 ;::: ;:: 0 ~ -.0 -.0 ..... i""o co co .co co ~ ~ 0 0 c5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I 9 - 0 U'\ S U"\ 0 U'\ ~ U"\ 0 U"\ S! ~ 0 I- 0 ~ g 8 ~ 0 .... -.0 -.0 ~ -.0 6 ..... co co ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 1\:1 €>NION3 3Wn'O^.~H "'1 '~lOl ~ t; ::::> ~ ~~ 10 0:: . - ~ :3 ~ V) a qJ ~ :em 10 crj ~ D: oUJ Z q ~ a: . e 1&. 0 ~ :> - ~ ~ ~ l- i ~ - tiz '- Li3 x 0:: ~ ~oz e 0 :; N - l:r ~ n- ~ :3 ~ ("C""' ~ '0 ~ ~ ~ n z~ a: ~ .-. en 0:: lU en 2m; (9 o ...) c ~ o~~ - a: a: .LJ 5 a: a --i lU 0 i . 1&. C G -- r- ti ~ - 9 lU '7 c a: -- % - ~z e 0:: $I \(\ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ - - cnO~ S C) crj N ~ "" l"" ~m~ - N" ...1.... ---.. - - - - /_, ~z' - -:; ~ --i -> IW \. J .,...... i= '2 a: IG 0:: ~ L oz zo", 0.--- ~ - en - ~ (~I,(I;<.) - , $0 - ~CD~ I(x) ~ ~ 14f~ ~ ~ 00 o(l)~ ~ ~ --i :t a:: - Ie .,..) N ~ ~ ~ >-< ~)(I 1&. "3 IT \J\. "" .,..... ~ - - - IA"- if) ~~~! ~ ~ ~~ I.(;~~r w '\J"\ g V' 0 '\J"\ g 'U'"" 0 ~t ...... ~ 0 ...... ~ 0 ..J ~ '-0 '-0 C'- C'- l:'- OJ ~ ...... ...... .... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... I J-, I I I J-, I J-, - 0 ~ '\J"\ 0 g 0 9 I- 0 ...... ..::t 0 ~ ~ '-0 '-0 ~- '-0 C'- C'- ~ ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... DATE NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND 1'5 MINUTE PERIOD ENDING L I T I R L I T I R L I T I R L I T ~I.~ a:: 1 \~ W:1.'"7 :..., . C r; !... ( L.;, 100 "':2.,t::' I. '1 ;" -.- ::) i ~f - I I .... J ;;'- 0 -. ,- c.- "I , ~ ~(I \ 1'.. , J: L; , .~ f p' . :: ~( . ";..J , .. - ').. I '- .; - - - L. . 0 '0 \ ...... JI ~ ~ J..'( . . I ' L-ll1 1 l~~ L. '.:"- :':; y-I 4 r"'~ I ";~ ! UJ ' I , ....L . Q. , <" J { . l... "J ....- r. . -. ... . , ~- . ,\ . - - ".... , - '~ \ ..... : ., - -', ,,'. -' J ! - . - - ~ . t:. t ') i..{ ... '". . ;... I . 4' !~ 2. \ ~ I ~ ,,-. I - , - r ",,/ - I ..,..J , .. I . '.. 0' I '...;.-- ~, - a:: .( . . ~ :..; q:.{ r ~l ~ I - ..~- 44 I .- r'~ ;, I ....." :.... "I -""1'1 ~o ,_ ::) .; / 0 ! ,-, q f6l~ J: '~i. lJ1c . : , ( :-'. . - .": ~ ... ~I ~l~ i"....li .;.... . .. : . ~':. - ~ I ~ . C' ... 1 '1) Z~ I --I' V ...- ,- Li L'- ... X"r ~Y7 .; JO/.. I ')\~ UJ - \ ' , , , (', ..... .~- I , Q. ~ Q. a:: ::) 0 J: x: ~ UJ Q. La. La. .~ . \ ( . c: ',', S 1?~21 I 01/1 ' l~~ 1 'l-!_ 345 1/~~ 0 , , ,,' LOCATION .. .. .. l "- ~ N I... ~ )--0-\.. I I 10 01 : \_0_( ~ MANUAL TRAFFIC COUNT FORM s-e., I;, '.. }- \ {7.' CF , ( I L'\ i',' \. ' _ ,.... ~ . 1...1 l. i'-J '~t' ' "" - - '. '..., - :. " - ," :... L. -./ .., / .; PEDESTRAIN TALLY 0 0 0 0 A M PEAK HOUR P M PEAK HOUR cOFF PEAK HOUR -~ ...... CEO R C E S . N 0 L TEe 0 N S U L TIN eel V I LEN C I NEE R S. I N C. I" ~ i...,P --- DATE q_i \_~~ NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND WESTBOUND ~' '- -" 115 MINUTE PERIOD ENDING L I T I R L I T I R L I T I R L I T I R a::: -"t o"T~'- ..,.. , It'1 I. 21 57? '1~" '" 1< G-; ? :"1 \"\ :J - . " 0 '') 1 ~ -z. ~4 zt5 5'11 J: , I"'t..: .: .'""""- r~ ~S 2""', , ... .. .- \ - -' "".... :ll:: I 53 57b ~ , i~>~ w< \ '2 I \c3 '2 '51 ';!.::j I ' . oJ , J oJ . I.&J Q. /''''.,:) 1~3 I \ I "yLf 4~ c:-"J '-~5 ! ! ::.~ .. c J -" L-,,.. ~. . --"'J 2 ~ ... iC::;" '2. ~2 '2sf "9 sz, ",'" (: '2 '2 ~. \" ) C . ~ oJ...) . - ~- a:: r 2 ,)' 7'1 : ?I'"' r) (O3 2'?\ 37 c ?.... b22 i <.J "'" J_' :J I. _,. '" ., 0 ,-'" 0 Z7 ZS4 3~ ~''1 ~27 J: tt :).~ t :..,.~. ..~ -, 'J ' J.,. :ll:: ~ : IC, ..... 4 ; :",":; :Ci'4 C 77 "2..~7 !.Ja ';0 526 ' ,... ! I I.&J J Q. 2 Q. a:: :J 0 J: ~ ~ I.&J Q. lA.. lA.. I:~ 5"- S . ~,'" ~o2. Z. ~~3 ~g3 !S~ ~l1 '23&2- 0 .. ,~ LOCATION ,.- - .' I. [ r~ ! I [ [ i ! [ , ! [ L ~ N · /-0-\... I I 10 .01 )_0-1 'I MANUAL TRAFFIC COUNT FORM .: e. ! 1 r~,\I-1 P.5 (~, (. /"' \'-1 D'~ 1. ) A \",1 PEDESTRAIN TALLY 0) 0 0 0 A M PEAK HOUR P M PEAK HOUR I OFF PEAK HOUR HI GEORGE S. '-lI -- NOLTE CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS. INC. GA ~_. -