Site and Architectural - 1989MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Steve Piasecki, Director of Planning
Tim J. Haley, Associate Planner'~'~j-
DATE:
January 23, 1992
SUBJECT: Street Improvement Median Requirement S 89-13
I have reviewed the Planning Commission's Condition of Approval as they
relate to remodel of Kirkwood Plaza, and a requirement for a median island.
Subsequent to the Planning Commission's approval, the Public Works
Department had prepared an agreement with the applicant wherein an area
wide traffic study has been undertaken. Based upon this traffic study, the City
Engineer has determined that an alternative method for traffic mitigation in
this area would be the installation of a new signal at the intersection of
Fulton Street and West Campbell Avenue. An agreement was signed by the
applicant implementing this strategy. On June 13, 1990. This agreement,
however, was not signed by the Mayor or the City Attorney.
Also, please find attached a letter from Bill Helms to Kent Kirkorian,
indicating the City's desire for Mr. Kirkorian to participate in 50 percent of the
cost of the proposed traffic signal at Fulton Street and West Campbell
Avenue.
Recommendation and Conclusion:
It appears that the City Engineer has provided an alternative addressing traffic
concerns in this area of West Campbell Avenue in lieu of the required traffic
median. If we strongly oppose this alternate traffic mitigation measure, I
would suggest we schedule a meeting with the Public Works Department
staff to discuss how we could best address this issue prior to contacting the
applicant, or prior to presenting this matter to the Planning Commission.
cc. Michelle Quinney, Public Works Department
Attachment~:
1. Agreement, dated June 13, 1990
2. Staff Report of September 26, 1989, including Conditions of Approval
3. Planning Commission Minutes of September 26, 1989
4. Letter from Bill Helms to Kent Kirkorian, dated January 23, 1992
IrdRKORIAN
DEVELOPMENTS
Commercial Industrial Apartments
October 10, 1991
OCT 11,
~ITY OF ~AMPI'~IELL
~LANNING OEPAGTMENT
City of Campbell
70 North First St.
Campbell, Ca. 95008
Re: Kirkwood Plaza Shopping Center
Attn: Mr. Haley
Dear Mr. Haley,
As per our previous conversation it is mutually agreed upon
that we will do the following. Install trees behind the
center and adjacent to the sound wall every twenty feet.
The trees will be Cryte Myrtle and Bradford Pear. Also we
will address the compactor at the rear of Baskin Robbins in
the near future when we develop that piece of property.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
KK/m.kk
III I II
1630 WEST CAMPBELL AVENUE
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008
(408) 379-4547 FAX (408) 379-9093
October 7, 1991
Mr. Steve Piasecki
Planning Director
City of Campbell
70 N. First St.
Campbell, Ca. 95008
Dear Mr. Piasecki,
Join us as we cross Campbell Avenue to our brand new 1991
version of the Freshest Foods in Town. Help us break in our new
store!
Though the doors will open Saturday, October 12 for the very
first time, we will officially complete our walk with a ribbon
cutting on Wednesday.
Come! Help us Celebrate!
What: Nob Hill Foods Ribbon Cutting
When: Wednesday, October 16
Time: 5:30 p.m.
Where: 1602 Campbell Avenue, Kirkwood Plaza
Sincerely,
NOB HILL GENERAL STORE, INC.
Michael A. Bonfante
President
MAB: lp
CITY OF CAMPBELL 'APPLICATION FOR BUILDI~'
Applicant ' s Name:
Cons:ruction Lender's Name:" /Fc~d/~
~ERMIT
Address:
T.l.phon.:
State License No:
ANN: Planning Dept. No. Energy Calcs.
Group: B°71- Type: 0! r I ~_~ Fire Sprinklered:
No. of Bldgs:
Residential Units:
Commercial Units:
Description of Work: ~. [,.
Square Feet~a) m97o ~ 7. ~
Square Feet (b)
Other:
Advance Fee Paid: $
Building Permit Feets
Construction Tax: $
No. Sets of Signed Plans:
Condition or Remarks:
%/.
Valuation (a) /?, q~5-6
Valuation (b)
Total Valuation: ]~4
Date: Receipt
Total Building Permit Fee:
Balance Due :
Eng. Calcs: ~J 6
z~___:~,,,~~/o'z~ ~.. f.
Logged:
COMPLETE OTHER SIDE
FItOJECT ADDRESS
CITY OF (~AMP))ELL '° ROUTE SHEET
APplicant- must contac~ depar~men~o and provide addition~l info~tion
Mrked oXe below. Approvals ~11 be sran~ed by each city deparcuent
throush ~eroffice ~il on separate
~equLrsd
Approved
WEST VALLEY SANITATION DIsTI~ICT:
100 [. Suflnyolks Ave, Campbell, CA 95008. ~08/37e-2½07
0.. (,) ..t 0, p,... ,or ,.,u.trl., ..d .mr.,.,
~ ~ ~ Return yeli~ ~py of ~r ~lt ~ ~lld(flg
Supply plot plen~ elevitfon end flor pien.
~I~ ~S~*S O~I~:
123 ~ton Ave. ~!1, ~ ~5~.
Supply ~ (1) set of ~le~ butld~ng plins.
PUBLIC VOWS DEP~~:
70 ~. First St. ~be11, ~ ~5~8. ~8/MG-2150
Supply five sets of off-site f~rovmnt plins and excivltfo~ ~ft epplfcit~on.
~TI~E: ~rluint to ~lpter 11.3~ of t~ ~11 ~ctpll ~de, In~ d~rt or
debris 9enerl~d it I construction st~ ~t ~s Ill~d ~ rm(n on I public
right of wiy for ~re then t~]ve (12) ~urs my ~ r~ved by t~ city AT T~
EXP[NSZ OF T~ ~LI~T FOR THIS ~I~INO PZ~IT. FAIL~ T0 PAY T~
WILL RESULT IN SUSP~NSI~ OF ~T~R ~I~ING I~P~CTI~.
~IRO~~ B~ S~RVIC~S: Steve ~ks~ 408/299-~.
2220 Hoorpark Ave~ San Jose, ~ 95128
Supply ~ (2) sets of ~lete bu(ldtng plens.
~A~ POllUTiON CO~O~: Clifford R. Youn9m
7~ ~ EmPros Rd, ~n Jose, ~
~B~ ~IO~ S~OO~ DIS~ICT: Ja~en ~sstdy, ~OB/37B-34~
I~ N. Third St, ~11~ ~ ~8
~RI~ SCBOO~ DIStil: C.B. T~er, ~/377-2103
4115 Jacksol Dr, ~n Jose, ~ ~5124.
REqUIReD
RECEIVED
ENEIt~/ FORI~ --
BANDICAPPED FOItY, S
SOILS ~EI~OI[T
ENGINEERING CALCULi?IONS
PLAN CHECK FEE
SOI~qD TRANSHISSION CONTROL
DRAINAGE PLAIq
OTHER
KIRKORIAN
DEVELOPMENTS
Commercial Industrial Apartments
,,qEP
CITY
~L~NNIN8
September 25, 1991
City of Campbell
70 N First St.
Campbell, Calif. 95008
Re: Kirkwood Plaza Approval
Attention: Tim J. Haley
Dear Mr. Haley:
As per our conversation of September 23, 1991 regarding
items 1 and 4 of your letter dated September 16, 1991.
request the following:
Item 1 - Special paving at the entry driveway and the
walkway near Nob Hill:
I would like to address the Planning Commission on this
matter as we have put in additional planters in front of the
Nob Hill store and believe this adds more esthetic value to
the Center.
Item 4 - Compactor at the rear of Baskins Robbins:
We will be putting in a planter to accomodate a climbing
vine as discussed with Steve Piasecki.
So that Nob Hill can open as scheduled and to avoid delays
because of final approval I hereby request Thirty Days from
the date of this letter to complete the landscape work
described in Item 4.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sin~rely, , /
iii
1630 WEST CAMPBELL AVENUE
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008
(408) 379-4547 FAx (408) 379-9093
PROJECT ADDRESS:
CITY .., CAMPBELL *' ROUTE SHEE
(/'.),
Applicant must contact departments and provide additional ~nfo~acion
~rked 'X' below. Approvals will be ~ranc~d by ~ach city department
through interoffice ~il on separate fo~s.
Required Approved
I~ST VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT:
100 E. Sunnyo&ks Ave~ C41mpbell, CA 95008. ~08/178-2½07
Supply one (1) ,et of pi,ns for tndustrl,1 end com~erctml development,.
Return yellow copy of sewer permit to l~tlding ~ep~rtanent.
PLANNING DEP~NT:
?0 ~. First 5t.~ ~mp~ll~ ~ ~5008. ~08/8~-2~0
$~ppl~ plot pl~a~ sIs*~tioa ~ floor pl~a.
FIRE ~S~S OFFICE:
~upply oae (~) sst of
PUBLIC ~O~S DEP~NT:
~0 N. First ~t. C~be]]~
right of ~y for ~r~ th~a
EXPENSE 0F T~ ~PLI~NT FOR THIS ~I~INC PE~IT. FAILLE T0 PAY T~ EXPENSE
IlLL RESULT IN SUSPENSION OF ~T~R ~I~INC INSPECTIONS.
~RO~N~ B~ SERVICES: Steve Brooks, ~08/299-6~0.
2220 Hoorpark Ave, San Jose, ~ 95128
Supply t~ (2) sets of c~lete buJldJng plan~.
VATER POLLUTION CONTROL: ClJfford R. Young, ~08/9~5-5300.
700 Los EsCeros Rd~ San Jose, ~ 9513q
C~L ~ZON SCHOOL DZSTRICT: daneen ~ssidy~ ~08/378-3~0S
15S N. Third Sta C~bella
C~RZ~ SCBOOL D~STEICT: C.B. T~ner~ ~08/377-2103
~115 dacksol Dr~ San dose~ ~ 9512k.
RECEIVED
ENERGY FORHS
HANDICAPPED FORHS
SOILS REPORT
P~,s CHECK nE
SOUND TRANSMISSION CONTROL
DRAINAGE PLAN
OTHER
CI~TY OF CAMPBELL
APPLICATION FOR BUILDING ~MIT
Applicant's Name:
Applicant's Address:
Construc'tion Lender's Name
DATE
Telephone:
Building Address: /~/&9/7""/~c~ /_/.,~, ~--~,~z/_~~~
Owner, 7~/~~~ ~' Telephone: ~¢f'~-'/f'~-
Contractor's Name: ~-~ "~~ State License No:
Address:
No. of Bldgs: ~/
Planning Dept. No.
' Residential Units
Energy Calcs. ~
Fire Sprinklered:,, ~
Commercial Units: _~'~.
Description of Work: /~-d~ /~ /~~_//~
Square Feet(a~;-z%/ ~/~z~'~z'~ ,~z~.M~ Valuation (a) ///.~/
Square Feet(b) ~~ ~, Valuation (b) ~.
Other: / Total Valuation: ~. ~.~
Advance Fee Paid: $ /~/ f~. M~ Date: ~/~/~ Receipt
Building Permit Fee:$ ~.. ~,~Total Building Permit Fee:
Construction Tax: $ 3 ~ ~Z~..~. ~'"(fQ Balance Due
.No. Sets of Signed Plans:~fz/~eJ T~ Z~/~Kng. Calcs: ~
Condition or Remarks:
COMPLETE OTHER SIDE
June 7, 1990
IRA KIRKORIAN
DEVELOPMENTS
1820 WEST CAMPBELL AVENUE
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008
(408) 379-4547
CITY OF CAI~IFBlC:-LI-
lai;ANNING DI=PAI~TM£NT
City of Campbell
70 North First St.
Campbell, Calif. 95008
Re: Kirkwood Plaza Renovation - Precast Concrete Fence
Attention: Tim Haley
Dear Tim:
The existing 4-plex building is 12'-0" feet from back of sidewalk. Our
proposal is to run the 12'-0" wall to the corner of the building and the
remaining 12 feet to the sidewalk will be 42 inches high and act as a
retaining wall.
Color will be the Grey as shown for the main color line of the Shopping
Center. Enclosed a brochure showing the textures on both sides.
Thank you for your cooperation on this matter.
COMMERCIAL - INDUSTRIAL - APARTMENTS
I ITY OF I AMPBEtl
70 NORTH FIRST STREET
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008
(408) 866-2100
FAX # (408) 379-2572
Planning
Department:
June 6, 1990
Kent Kirkorian
Kirkorian Development
1820 West Campbell Avenue
Campbell, CA 95008
RE: Landscape Plans - 1604 - 1700 West Campbell Avenue - S 89-13
Please be advised that the Site and Architectural Review Committee, at
its meeting of June 5, 1990, approved your landscape plans as
submitted.
If you should have any questions, regarding this application, please do
not hesitate to contact the Planning Department at (408) 866-2140.
Sincerely,
Tim J.
Planner II
cc:
Dillon/Drulias
Landscape Architects
Associates, Inc.
405 Alberto Way, Suite A
Los Gatos, CA 95032
C ! T Y 0 F C A M P B E L L
FILE #: ~' ~P~.-/~ SITE ADDRESS:
APPLICANT/OWNER: /~zff. ~//- ~/~g~f~//44/
DAT . PROO .CT A PROV .O BY CO SS ON:
The
the
applicant/owner of the above-referenced project does hereby agree to
following condition, which was approved as a part of this application:
In lieu of the Landscape Bond requested as a condition
of the above-referenced approval, I do hereby agree to
the alternate condition that the proposed development
as described above shall not receive final Building
Department clearance until the landscaping which was
required, and accepted, as a part of such approval has
been completely installed and accepted by the Planning
Director of the City of Campbell.
Signed: ~~~~
*Authority:~/~7~/~Z- _ .. ~/'~
Date: J- /~- ~
*Note:
This agreement shall be signed before a Notary by the owner,
developer or his agent, or any persons having an equitable
interest in the development.
NOTARY:PUBLIC:
(County of Santa Clara,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SS.
COUNTY OF .............................
On this ......... 16th .... day of... May ............ in the year.., t.990 ...........
....................................................................... , before me,
..... ~ .a.r.y..D..e..n~¥.i. ........................... a Notary Public, State of California,
duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared ...................................
..... Kent..Kirko=ian ........................................................
personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be
the person .... whose name .... is ..................................................
subscribed to this instrument, and acknowledged that .... he .... executed it.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal
in the ...... State..of.. Call f.o r.nia ................................. County of
....... San.t a..Clara ....................... ~ .... on the date set fo~h above
in this certificate. ~ i .'(- '
This d .....tis onJy a g ..... If .... hich may be p,o~r ~ .... in simple t ..... ti ..... d in no ~ [ [/ _ ~ ~ ~ ~,'~
way ams, or is inte~ to am, ~ a substitute for the advice on an aMorney The printer does not ~ Notary Public, State of California
Cowdery's Form No. 32 -- Acknowledgement to Notary Public -- Individuals -- (C.C. Sec. 1189}:~ (Rev. 1/83)
MEMORANDUM
To:
Chuck Streeter
Fire Marshal
Date:
CITY OF CAMPBELL
May 9, 1990
From:
Tim J. Haley
Planner II
Subject:
Fire Department's Access Requirements (S 89-13)
Kirkwood Plaza Shopping Center
The Architect has modified the entry driveway for the above-referenced
shopping center remodel based upon the request of the Fire Department.
This modification has eliminated the design concept of a landscape
median as approved by the Planning Commission and has substantially
increased this driveway width. This project is accessed by four other
driveways which are capable of providing fire apparatus access.
Based upon the Planning Department's review of this matter, it appears
that this driveway entrance is not necessary for fire apparatus access
to this project. Consequently, the Architect should be able to comply
with the concept originally approved by the Planning Commission and
reviewed by the Fire Department.
Please review this matter and advise the Planning Department of your
decision within ten (10) days.
Attachments:
1. Section of the Site Plan
2. Letter from Architect
70 NORTH FIRST STREET
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008
(408) 866-2100
Planning
Department:
Mr. Jerry Winges, AIA
Hagman Associates Architects
114 Santa Margarith Avenue
Menlo Park, CA 94025
April 17, 1990
RE: Building Submittal (S 89-13) - 1604-1700 West Campbell Avenue
Dear Mr. Winges:
The Planning Department has reviewed your plan submittal to the Campbell
Building Department for compliance with the Planning Commission's
approval. The following comments regarding this submittal are offered at
this time:
The presented site plan indicates a substantial increase in the width
of the entry driveway. It is recommended that the entry walkway be
reduced to a 5 foot width; that a landscaped median be retained in
this area versus a cobble treatment; and, that the necessity of 3
travel lanes be reviewed.
The approved site plan indicates the provision of a pre-cast wall and
landscape strip along the rear property line. The current site plan
terminates this wall and landscape concept at the rear of the Nobhill
Store.
The landscape area around the transformer box west of Renzo's
Restaurant should be expanded to provide better screening. This area
should be reflected on landscape plans.
Sheet L-3 of the landscape plan is incomplete.
Greater detail should be provided of plaza detail adjacent to the new
office building on sheet L-4 and planting on the office deck area
should be provided.
0
A signage program should be submitted for the shopping center
identifying criteria and standards for new signage; and,
Three copies of the landscape and irrigation plans should be submitted
to the Planning Department for the Site and Architectural Review
Committee's approval.
If you should have any questions regarding the requested information,
please do not hesitate to contact the Planning Department, at (408)
866-2140.
Sincerely,
Planner II
CITY OF kMPBELL
70 NORTH FIRST STREET
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95OO8
(408) 866-2100
FAX # (408) 379-2572
Department:
Planning
January 23, 1990
Jerry L. Winges, AIA
Hagman Associates
114 Santa Margarita
Menlo Park CA 94025
Temporary Trailers
1604 - 1700 W. Campbell Ave.
Dear Mr. Winges:
In response to your submittal dated January 2, 1990, please be advised that
approval of temporary trailers at Kirkwood Plaza will require the approval of
the Planning Commission as a modification to the Site and Architectural
application. This' request should illustrate or discuss the following:
An analysis of parking, building usage and square footage.
Provision of interim improvements, landscape, walkways, etc.
Elevations of the trailers (color and materials).
4. Discussion of time period.
An application form is enclosed together with a red lined copy of your site
plan. If you should have any questions regarding these items, please do not
hesitate to call the undersigned at 866-2140.
Sincerely,
Tim J. Haley
Planner II
TJH:pm
Encls.
IRA KIRKORIAN
DEVELOPMENTS
1820 WEST CAMPBELL AVENUE
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008
(408) 379-4547
October 2, 1989
City of Campbell
70 North First St.
Campbell, Calif. 95008
Attention: Steve Piasecki
Dear Steve:
Just a short note to show our appreciation for the excellent work on the
part of yourself and staff on the Kirkwood Plaza renovation.
The application from commencement to the Planning Con~ission meeting was
handled very professionally and it involved a lot of work with preparation
and study sessions. Your presentation to the planning commission was clear
and precise and as a result the Planning Commission gave us their unanimous
vote. Thank you again for your support and assistance.
OCT 1989
CI'I~ OF CAIWPEi£LI.
PI2ANNINB OEPARTlel ICN'i-
COMMFRCIAL - INDUSTRIAL - APARTMENTS
CITY OF AMPB[LL
70 NORTH FIRST STREET
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008
(408) 866-2100
Department: Planning
September 29, 1989
Mr. Kent Kirkorian
1820 West Campbell Avenue
Campbell, CA 95008
OUR FILE NO: S 89-13
SITE ADDRESS: 1604 - 1700 W. Campbell Avenue
APPLICANT: Kirkorian Development
Please be advised that the Planning Commission, at its meeting of September 26,
1989, approved your request to remodel and expand portions of the Kirkwood
Plaza Shopping Center. A copy of the approved plans is enclosed for your
reference.
Please note that this approval is effective 10 days following the Planning
Commission action and is subject to the conditions indicated in the attached
Conditions of Approval. Please note that Condition No.16 requires the
.submittal of a revised site plan addressing a number of minor changes to the
plan presented to the Planning Commission. In addition, to those items
discussed in that condition, the Commission also asked that the staff work with
the applicant regarding the provision of handicapped parking spaces for this
project.
If you should have any questions regarding the Conditions of Approval, or the
Commission's decision, please do not hesitate to contact the Planning
Department at (408) 866-2140.
Sincerely,
Enclosure: Conditions of Approval
cc: Fire Department ~=
Public Works Department
Architect,Hagman Associates, 114 Santa Margarita, Menlo Park, CA 94025
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE # S 89-13
SITE ADDRESS: 1604 - 1700 W. CAMPBELL AVE.
APPLICANT: KIRKORIAN
PC HTG DAW: 9/26/89
The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that he/she is
required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of
the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. Additionally,
the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all
applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of
California which pertain to this development and are not herein specified.
Fencings/Landscaping: Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated
and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be
maintained in accordance with the approved plans.
~andscapin~/Irri~ation: Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant
material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Plannin~
Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee
and/or Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit.
FencinK: Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to
be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning
Director prior to issuance of a building permit.
Performance Bond - LandscapinK, Fencin~ Striping: Applicant to either (1)
post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $20,000 to insure
landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months of
completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to complete
landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond or agreement to
be filed with the Planning Department prior to application for a building
permit.
Utility Boxes: Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department,
prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the
location of the boxes and screening (if boxes are above ground) for
approval of the Planning Director.
Mechanical Equipment/Utility Meter ScreeninK: All mechanical equipment on
roofs and all uttlity~ters to be screened as approved by the Planning
Director.
ParkinK/Driveways: All parking and driveway areas to be developed in
compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking
spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards.
Utilities: Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section
20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code.
Utilities: Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall
indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground-utilities
including water, aewer, electric, telephone and television cables.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - S 89-13
1604 - 1700 W. CAMPBELL AVENUE
KIRKORIAN DEVELOPHENT
PC MTG: 9/26/89
PAGE TWO
10. Signing: Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of
the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until
application is approved and permit issued by Planning and Building
Departments (Section 21.53 of the Campbell Municipal Code).
11. Garbage Collection: Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code
stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse,
garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of
Campbell shall be made with Green Yalley Disposal Company. This
requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment
units, to all commercial, business, industrial, ,mnufacturing, and
construction establishments.
12. Trash Containers/Enclosures: Trash container(s) of a size and quantity
necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by
the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of
a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing
doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. Ail enclosures to be
constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash
enclosure area to service these containers.
13~ Handicapped Requirements: Applicant shall comply with all appropriate
State and City requirements for the handicapped.
14. Property Security: The applicant is hereby notified that the property is
to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the
time that actual construction comences. All existing structures shall be
secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be
demolished or removed from the property. Sect. 11.201 & 11.414, 1979 Ed.
Uniform Fire Code.
15. Trash Enclosure Security: Applicant to provide on-site security to monitor
illegal disposal of trash and debris at rear of shopping center. In the
event that e trash problem exists in the future, as recommended by the
Planning Director or Fire Harshall, applicant shall provide security
fencing and/or monitoring.
16. Revised Site Plan: A revised site plan indicating minor adjustments to
improve fire truck circulation, relocation of the trash compactor at
Whitwood Lane, incorporation of 10 square feet landscappe parkway path
alone San Tomas Aquino Road and distinctive pavement treatment at project
entry to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site
and Architectural Review Gomnittee prior to application for building
permit.
RECOMM]~qDED FINDINGS - 89-13
1604 - 1700 W. CAMPBELL AVENUE
KI]{XORIAN
PC MTG: 9/26/89
PAGF. THREE
Public Works
17. Obtain an excavation permit, pay fees and post surety to relocate the face
of curb on Campbell Avenue, install electroliers, reconstruct sidewalk on
project frontage and relocate driveway opening as directed by the City
Engineer.
18. Apply for vacation of a portion of Campbell Avenue to accommodate curb
relocation.
19. Construct median island on Campbell Avenue project frontage.
20. Modify intersection striping at Campbell Avenue and San Tomas Aquino Road
as directed by City Engineers.
Fire Department
21. Fully supervised fire sprinkler protection is required throughout the
facility.
22. On-site fire hydrants are required. U.F.C., Section 10.301(c).
23'. No parking signs and curb marking required.
24. Provide an allowable area study as per UBC 507.
25. Wall opening protection shall be provided at property lines including
covered walkways extending across property lines by hardware store.
26. The fire sprinkler system shall include 1~" hose outlets. U.F.C.
10.311(f).
27. Access driveways do not provide adequate room for fire apparatus access.
U.F.C. 10.207(g).
Buildin~ Department
28. Meet minimum code requirements at time of technical review.
29. Walkways in front of Nob Hill must be maintained at 5 feet width since the
occupant load exceeds 300. Obstructions from cart storage, columns and
possibly the room at the store fronts appear to present problems with the
requirement.
30. All stairs and exits shall comply with U.B.C and Handicapped codes,
~g Commisison Minutes 3
September 26,' 1989
PUBLIC HF. ARINGS Continued
3. S 89-13 Public hearing to consider the application of Mr. Kent Kirkorian for
Kirkorian, IC approval of a Site and Architectural application to allow the remodel
of an existing shopping center, on properties known as 1604 -
1700 W. Campbell Ave., in a C-1-S (Neighborhood Commercial/
Commercial) zoning District.
Chairperson Olszewski read the Application into the record.
Planning Director Piasecki presented the Application and presented a Site Plan.
Commissioner Perrine reviewed the considerations of the'Site and Architectural Review Committee.
Commissioner Christ cited the existing traffic circulation pattern in the area and asked ff left turns
from the driveways would be prohibited; City Engineer Helms responded that a median would be
installed on Campbell Ave. as part of this project and restrict some left hand turns.
· Chairperson Olszewski asked the Applicant to address the exterior treatment of the rear wall.
Commissioner Wiikin.~on cited the unfinished appearance of one end of the building.
Commissioner Christ wished to ensure that adequate and appropriately placed handicapped parking
existed; Planning Director Piasecki pointed out the number and placement of spaces proposed.
The Public Hearing was opened.
Mr. Kent Kirkorian, Kirkorian Development, responded to the request for information, stating that
they anticipated future expansion of the current proposal and thus had not finished one end of the
building; it was financially unfeasible to develop the entire project at one time.
Ms. Sara Katherine Beatle, stated she was pleased with Kirkorian projects in the past; however,
she was concerned about the loss of on-street parking in her residential area. She noted the exist-
ing level of traffic, noise and the number of accidents that had occurred on Campbell Ave.; usually
there was a landscape buffer installed between retail/commercial uses and residential homes which
protected neighborhood residents.
City Engineer Helms commented that consideration could be given to landscaping the new median.
Mr. Kirkorian added that there was a restaurant in the existing development, not a night club; he
reviewed the current uses in the center and noted that several driveways along Campbell Ave. had
been eliminated per Staff Recommendation.
Project Architect made himself available .for questions and provided technical information requested.
M/S Perrine, Meyer That the Public Hearing on S 89-13 be closed carried unanimously
(7-0)
Commissioner Christ asked that Staff consider his request for additional handicapped parking; it
was his understanding that this Application would not come before the Commission again.
M/S Meyer, Wilkinson .Mot!on to Accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepai'ed
tot the project, to adopt the attached Findings and approve Appli-
cation S 89-13 subject to the attached Conditions of Approval.
Commisison Minutes 4
September 26, 1989
PUBLIC HEARINGS Continued
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
Vote on Morion:
Commissioners Christ, Fox, Meyer, Wilkinson, Alne, Perrine, Olszewski
None.
None.
4. M 89-16
Stanford,
Public hearing to consider the application of Mr. Mark Stanford on
behalf of Pathway, Inc., for a modification to a previously ap-
proved Use Permit to allow conversion of a 23 bed senior housing
facility to a 19 bed residential drug treatment facility for youths, on
property known as 531 N. Central Ave., in a C-1-S (Neigh-
borhood Commercial) Zoning District.
Chairperson Olszewski read the Application into the record.
Planning Director Piaseeki presented the Application and discussed the Staff Report Main Issues
and ~ he presented an Aerial Map and a Site Plan.
.Chai,..r~.rson. Olszewski cited the Findings required by the Code, Section 21.72.050 and noted that
msuf. fieient information on Pathways, Inc. was provided by the Applicant.
Mr. Esau Herrera, Pathways Board of Directors, requested a Continuance in order to provide the
necessa~ information.
Commissioner Perrine stated that the Site and Architectural Review Committee made no recomme~
dation at this time; he asked that the Application be referred back to the Committee when additional
information was available.
The Public Hearing was opened.
Mr. Hen'era reiterated their request for a Continuance and added that Pathways wished to be a
good neighbor; information on their operation, structure and history could be provided.
Commissioner Perrine asked how Pathways proposed to avoid being "...detrimental to the health,
safety, peace, morals, comfort or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neigh-
borhood of such proposed use..." as required in order for the Commission to make the Finding.
Mr. Herrera reiterated that they intended to be good neighbors and secondly, by providing the
additional information cited above.
Chairperson Olszewski advised Pathways Representatives that the two week Continuance re-
quested may not be sufficient to provide'the information promised; Mr. Herrera responded that he
was confident the two weeks would be adequate.
In response Commissioner Perrine's questions, Mr. Herrera reviewed the referral process for
Pathways; with respect to the fact that only one nighttime staff person was scheduled to be on duty
in this unlocked facility, he added that the power of their teaching and the community/family atmo-
sphere provided to clients would prevent residents fi.om walking off site.
In resP°nse to Commissioner Fox's question, Mr. Herrera stated that there had never been an
incident at their San Jose facility ia which the police were called in; Pathways was a model facility.
Commisison Minutes
September 26, 1989
PUBLIC HEARINGS Continued
In response to Commissioner Meyer's question, Mr. Herrera confirmed that the San Jose facility
was for adults only, while the proposed center would be for adolescents; there were few or no
drug treatment services in the area similar to that proposed.
Dr. Mark Stanford, Executive Director of Pathways, confn'med that there were no other in-patient
programs in the area for adolescents with drug problems; this was one of the issues.
Mr. Bill Thomas, 920 N. Central Ave., Campbell, doubted the statement that residential treatment
services were in short supply. His concerns included parking, especially on weekends, and the
limited supervision to be provided at night; he questioned the percentage of clients that would be
court referred and did not think that schools could refer students to such a facility. He had not
been Noticed despite the fact that he lived only three blocks away; he did not feel the Continuance
requested by the Applicant should be granted.
Planning Director Piasecki prOvided information on the Public Noticing provided (300 fl. radius).
Mr. Raymond Smith 592 N. Harrison St., Campbell, cited on-going traffic problems in the neigh-
borhood which had not been resolved despite the City's efforts; the proposed use would add to the
congestion. He asked where Pathways Staff would park during shift changes. With respect to the
claim that the Brueners parking lot could be used, a phone call to an official at the San Ramon
Store indicated that only three parking spaces would be allocated to Pathways.and were reserved
for physicians and nurses. He did not feel individuals would park off-site at Brueners and walk.
He stated that he was not against the concept of a drug rehabilitation center; however, this was a
residential neighborhood with many small children. He was not comfortable living in an area
where such a facility existed.
Mr. Jim Witkowski, 627 N. Harrison St., Campbell, asked ff Pathways Inc., had a written agree-
ment with Brueners for parking and whether handicapped parking would be provided. He asked
which schools would refer students to the facility and noted that the drug treatment center was in
appropriately located across the street from a liquor store, ff this operation was so organized, why
had the issues being raised not already been addressed?
Ms. Sarah Benton, 574 N. Harrison St., Campbell, reviewed her letter of September 20, 1989;
she added that she was very concerned for the safety of her children.
Ms. Linda Fazo, 542 Moniea La., Campbell, cited her letter of September 14, 1989; she noted the
commercial/retail uses in the area which already generated traffic and added that the San Jose
facility was not situated in a residential neighborhood, as the proposed facility would be. Finally,
once the use was allowed, any other treatment facility could use this site without a public hearing.
Thc City Attorney rcvicwed usc permit procedures and conf'Lrmed that thc usc ran with thc land. '
Mr. Grey Benton, 574 N. Harrison St., Campbell, reviewed his letter dated S~__ptember 20th. He
added that he could not imagine that an emergency could be handled by one staff person; Pathways
had no prior experience working with adolescents.
Planning Commisison Minutes
6 September 26, 1989
PUBLIC HEARINGS Continued
Mr. Ed Altman, 673 N. Harrison St., Campbell, stated that as a former police officer, he was
familiar with court referrals, which may not be the best people; in addition, there was a liquor store
in the immediate area. Campbell did not need this type of problem; he urged denial of the request.
Mr. Bob Burkhart, 859 Harrison St., Campbell, noted the lack of any recreational facilities on site;
he cited the high activity level of his own children and asked if off-site facilities be used.
Mr. Wayne Prescott, N. Central Ave., Campbell, stated that he had concerns regarding the ratio of
staff to residents; in addition, this proposal should have been better prepared by the Applicant. He
would be happy to assist Pathways, .Inc., in finding another location for their facility.
Ms. Becky Swensen, Berry Swensen Construction, stated that they had looked for almost three
years for the site. She noted that no one wanted this type of use in their neighborhood; however,
treatment facilities were necessary and this was the best organization they could find.
Ms. Helen Norwood, 842 N. Central Ave., Campbell, stated that two nursery schools were
located in the immediate area; they were required to have one staff person for every three children.
Mr. Paul Collula, 346 David Ave. Campbell, was concerned that there was no recreational space
on-site; secondly, he noted the strong objections of the neighborhood as demonstrated by the
number of residents present at the hearing.
Ms. Mc Call, 528 N. Harrison St., Campbell, stated that her main concern was her children; she
was worried about having more teenagers in the neighborhood.
Mr. Mike Wild stated that the main problem with this type of residential center was that no one
wanted such a facility in their back yard; he noted their efforts to find a suitable location and urged
that the community support this treatment center.
Ms. Kate 'Lennox, San Jose Unified School District, confirmed that the schools did refer students
to residential treatment centers; she urged the community to support this facility.
MS. Denise Cestini stated that her dance studio students were bothered by some residents of other
rehabilitation programs; she was worried what would happen in this neighborhood if a treatment
facility were located there.
Mr. Anthony Castaneda, Parole Officer for California Youth Authority, Pathways Board Member,
strongly urged the community to support this drug treatment program; he noted that only those
individuals suitable for a residential program would be placed at the proposed facility.
Mr. Don Christianson, San Jose Fire Department, 721 N. Central Ave., Campbell, cited an area in
the City of San Jose where various treatment facilities and halfway houses had been located; this
area now had one of the highest crime rates in the city. He did not want such a facility in his
neighborhood and was concerned that his property would be devalued.
Ms. Marjorie Zets, 761 N. Central Ave., Campbell, noted the existing problems with traffic; the
proposed facility would only add to the congestion. She requested information on staff qualifica-
tions and contended that one staff member could not deal with the number of residents on site.
f!~l~'nning Commisison Minutes 7 September 26, 1989
/~i~LIC HT=AR]~GS Continued
// Mr. B. Gerber, 831 Martha Ln., Campbell, stated he was willing to volunteer his time to help the
Y/ teenagers living in his neighborhood and attending local schools; whil~ traffic was an issue, any
tr use on the subject site would create traffic. He urged the Commission s approval of this request,
contingent upon meeting some of the neighbor's concerns
Mr. Victor Szumakow, 601 N. Central Ave., Campbell, objected to this treatment facility.
An unidentified speaker requested information on the length of time the search for a site had gone
on and whether the subject property was the first site found; Ms. Swensen provided the infor-
marion requested. He added that Campbell residents were worried about their homes.
Mr. Herrera ed approval of their request and agreed that the concerns raised had to be ad-
dressed; he w~g
confident that Pathways could speak to the neighbors' concerns.
Commissioner Christ favored a Continuance in order to allow the Applicants to provide the infor-
mation requested; he did not have adequate information on which to base a decision at this time.
He outlined the issues to be addressed by the Applicant.
Commissioner Alne noted the sensitivity of the issue; how the Applicant could have approached
such an issue with so little attention to the need for public relations was incomprehensible. His
expectation that the damage could be overcome in the two week period requested by the Applicant,
was bleak; however, a Continuance was acceptable to him.
Commissioner Fox wished to make a site visit to the San Jose facility prior to making a decision.
Chairperson Oiszewski agreed there was a lack of adequate information on this Aoplieation; he
noted for the benefit of the public that it was the Applicant's prerogative to request a ~-.~ntinuance.
M/S Perrine, Christ Moved to Continue M 89-16 to October 10, 1989, was carried
unanimously (7-0).
Break 10:25 - 10:45 P.M.
Commissioner Perrine absent for the remainder of the Meeting.
5.GP 89-07 (GP 89-05) Public hearing to consider the application of Mr. Don Peterson, on
Pcterson, D. behalf of Ainsley Development, for a General Plan Amendment to
allow a change in the General Plan Land Use designation from
~]~w-Medium Density Residential to Commercial, on property
own as 56 Foote Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/Commer-
cial) Zoning District. Tentative City Council agenda date: October
17, 1989.
Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Application and presented the General Plan Map of the area.
Commissioner Christ asked whether the minor adjustment in the designation line accommodated'
the commercial or the residential side of the site; the Applicant was asked to address this question.
Chairperson Olszewski suggested the Plannin~ Commission consider a ' ' · '
ment w'" ,, provmg the minor ad ust-
lth not less than ten feet (10 ft.) nor more than twenty feet (20 ~!)" to allow some leeway.
If approved, would there be a change in the number of units on the Low-Medium Density
Residential site? Principal Planner Stafford responded that such would be increased slightly.
ITEM NO. 3
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMMISSION OF SEPTEMBER 26, 1989
S 89-13
Kirkorian, K.
Public hearing to consider the application of Mr.
Kent Kirkorian for approval of a Site and
Architectural application to allow the remodel of
an existing shopping center (Kirkwood Plaza), on
properties known as 1604 - 1700 W. Campbell Ave.,
in a C-1-S (Neighborhood Co~ercial/Conunercial)
Zoning District.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission take the following actions:
1. ACCEPT the NEGATIVE DECLARATION which has been prepared for this project.
2. ADOPT the attached FINDINGS and APPROVE this APPLICATION subject to the
attached Conditions of Approval.
DISCUSSION
Applicant's Request: The applicant is requesting approval of plans to remodel
and reconstruct an existing shopping center located on the southwest corner of
Campbell Avenue and San Tomas Aquino Road. The submitted plans indicate a
substantial remodel of the shopping center. The significant changes are as
follows:
1.
2.
o
The construction of a 38,000 square foot Nob Hill Grocery Store.
The construction of a two-story office/retail building at the
southwestern corner of the shopping center.
A substantial upgrade in the landscaping and parking configuration to
the shopping center.
ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
The project site is currently shown as C-1-S (Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning
District, and is shown as Commercial on the City's General Plan. The proposed
structures and uses are consistent with this zoning district.
Project Site: The project site encompasses approximately 9.4 gross acres.
proposed and existing buildings would cover approximately 27 percent of the
site area. The following uses surround the site:
The
North
Across Campbell Avenue, retail and commercial
uses.
South -
Medium-Density Residential (fourplexes)
East -
Retail Commercial Uses
West
A continuation of the existing shopping center
(restaurant and retail uses).
An aerial photograph is attached, for the Commission review, depicting the
surrounding land uses.
S 89-13 - 2 - September 26, 1989
Site Plan: The submitted site plan indicates the reconfiguration of parking
aisles, the adjustment to the street right-of-way and bus duckout, and the
provision of additional landscaping along the street frontages. Approximately
13 percent of the project would be landscaped. This includes both the new
green areas or the new landscape areas along the street as well as hardscape
areas adjacent to the building uses.
Building Elevations: The submitted elevations indicating a substantial remodel
of the center, the new building facade would include an arcade element as well
as a sloped metal roof element. The arcade treatment is accented with a
stepped stucco design with ceramic tile band and accents and a feature tower
element towards the center of the property. The two-story office/retail
portion of the project indicates a stepped stucco design with an interior
elevator element. The extent of remodel of the center at this point would
include the hardware store, the new Nob Hill Food Store and the remainder of
the Center to the west through Renzo's Restaurant. The existing Fabriclands
Store and Baskin Robbins Store would not be remodelled at this time.
Parking Facilities: The applicant has indicated the provision of 532 parking
spaces for the proposed retail, restaurant and office uses. The proposed
remodel indicates an expansion of approximately 1000 square feet in retail use
and 6500 square feet of office use. The proposed increase would warrant the
provision of additional 34 parking spaces for this center. The presented site
plan with the reconfigured parking provides approximately 130 parking spaces
more than currently exists on the site and results in a parking ratio of
approximately 1:220 for the proposed square footages of the building.
Section 21.50.040 of the Campbell Municipal Code permits the Planning
Commission to adjust the parking ratios for specific use at a specific
location. The parking ordinance, additionally, provides that the Planning
Commission may permit two uses to jointly occupy the same parking spaces when
the parking demands occur at different times. Staff is of the opinion that the
shopping center of this nature warrants joint use of parking facilities due to
the differing uses and the differing parking demands in the shopping center.
The applicant's proposal is improving the parking situation that currently
exists on the site and is providing additional parking for the new uses at the
ordinance requirements of 1:200 for retail use and 1:225 for the proposed
office use.
Traffic Circulation and on-site Improvements: As a part of this proposal, the
applicant is proposing to reconfigure the parking area and eliminate several
driveway approaches along Campbell Avenue. These changes facilitate improved
site circulation and traffic patterns in this area. A traffic report was
prepared for this project, which is attached as an addendum. The traffic
report recommends minor changes to the intersection of San Tomas Aquino Road
and Campbell Avenue.
The applicant's proposal, additionally, is indicating the provision of a
pedestrian sidewalk separated by a 10 foot landscaped parkway along the
Campbell Avenue frontage. This concept provides both a safer and more
attractive pedestrian movement on-site.
S 89-13 - 3 - September 26, 1989
Architectural Advisor: The Architectural Advisor, is generally supportive of
the project remodel, however, he does express concern regarding the arcade
detail and the incorporation of the office/retail design into the center.
These items will be discussed at the Site and Architectural Review meeting.
Recommendation: Staff is recommending approval of the submitted plan. The
plan improves the site development in the following ways:
1. Provides a remodelled and updated buildings;
Improves on-site circulation through the reduction in driveway
approaches and improved parking access;
The site plan presents a substantial increase in the amount of
landscaping areas on the site providing both a more attractive
development and safer pedestrian movement;
The site plan incorporates a masonary screen wall on the rear of the
property a landscape buffer and improved loading and trash enclosure
locations; and,
An improvement in the proposed parking ratio vs. square footage for
the project is presented.
Attac~ents:
1. Recomended Findings
2. Conditions of Approval
3. Applicant's Description and Request
4. Aerial Photograph
5. Location Map
6. Reduced sets of plans and details.
7. Traffic Report
Submitted by: ~~~.~ ~ ~-~-
T~~a~II
Approved by~....~ ~ j--.~-~'~--'
Ste~ Piase~ki, ~l~ning Director
RECOMMENDED FINDINGS - S 89-13
1604 - 1700 W. CAMPBELL AVENUE
KIRKORIAN DEVELOPMENT
PC MTG: 9/26/89
Site and Architectural Approval
1. Scale: The proposed project is an appropriate scale in relationship to the
adjacent developed uses.
2. Design: The project is well designed and architecturally blends into the
neighborhood.
3. Parking: The parking provided at a ratio of 1:220 is considered
satisfactory for the proposed uses.
4. Compatibility: The project is designed to minimize infringement on
neighboring properties.
5. LandscapinR: Substantial landscaping has been provided which adds to the
aesthetics of the project and vehicle and pedestrian safety.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE # S 89-13
SITE ADDRESS: 1604 - 1700 W. CAMPBELL AVE.
APPLICANT: KIRKORIAN
PC MTG DATE: 9/26/89
The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that he/she is
required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of
the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. Additionally,
the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all
applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of
California which pertain to this development and are not herein specified.
Fencings/Landscaping: Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated
and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be
maintained in accordance with the approved plans.
Landscaping/Irrigation: Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant
material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning
Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee
and/or Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit.
o
Fencing: Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to
be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning
Director prior to issuance of a building permit.
Performance Bond - Landscaping~ Fencing, Striping: Applicant to either (1)
post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $20,000 to insure
landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months of
completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to complete
landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond or agreement to
be filed with the Planning Department prior to application for a building
permit.
Utility Boxes: Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department,
prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the
location of the boxes and screening (if boxes are above ground) for
approval of the Planning Director.
Mechanical Equipment/Utility Meter Screening: Ail mechanical equipment on
roofs and all utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning
Director.
o
Parking/Driveways: Ail parking and driveway areas to be developed in
compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. Ail parking
spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards.
8. Utilities: Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section
20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code.
Utilities: Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall
indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities
including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - S 89-13
1604 - 1700 W. CAMPBELL AVENUE
KIRKORIAN DEVELOPMENT
PC MTG: 9/26/89
PAGE TWO
10. SigninK: Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of
the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until
application is approved and permit issued by Planning and Building
Departments (Section 21.53 of the Campbell Municipal Code).
11. Garbage Collection: Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code
stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse,
garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of
Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This
requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment
units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and
construction establishments.
12. Trash Containers/Enclosures: Trash container(s) of a size and quantity
necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by
the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of
a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing
doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. Ail enclosures to be
constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash
enclosure area to service these containers.
13. Handicapped Requirements: Applicant shall comply with all appropriate
State and City requirements for the handicapped.
14. Property Security: The applicant is hereby notified that the property is
to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the
time that actual construction commences. All existing structures shall be
secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be
demolished or removed from the property. Sect. 11.201 & 11.414, 1979 Ed.
Uniform Fire Code.
15. Trash Enclosure Security: Applicant to provide on-site security to monitor
illegal disposal of trash and debris at rear of shopping center. In the
event that a trash problem exists in the future, as recommended by the
Planning Director or Fire Marshall, applicant shall provide security
fencing and/or monitoring.
16. Revised Site Plan: A revised site plan indicating minor adjustments to
improve fire truck circulation, relocation of the trash compactor at
Whitwood Lane, incorporation of 10 square feet landscappe parkway path
along San Tomas Aquino Road and distinctive pavement treatment at project
entry to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site
and Architectural Review Committee prior to application for building
permit.
RECOMMENDED FINDINGS - S 89-13
1604 - 1700 W. CAMPBELL AVENUE
KIRKORIAN DEVELOPMENT
PC MTG: 9/26/89
PAGE THREE
Public Works
17. Obtain an excavation permit, pay fees and post surety to relocate the face
of curb on Campbell Avenue, install electroliers, reconstruct sidewalk on
project frontage and relocate driveway opening as directed by the City
Engineer.
18. Apply for vacation of a portion of Campbell Avenue to accommodate curb
relocation.
19. Construct median island on Campbell Avenue project frontage.
20. Modify intersection striping at Campbell Avenue and San Tomas Aquino Road
as directed by City Engineers.
Fire Department
21. Fully supervised fire sprinkler protection is required throughout the
facility.
22. On-site fire hydrants are required. U.F.C., Section 10.301(c).
23. No parking signs and curb marking required.
24. Provide an allowable area study as per UBC 507.
25. Wall opening protection shall be provided at property lines including
covered walkways extending across property lines by hardware store.
26. The fire sprinkler system shall include 1½" hose outlets. U.F.C.
10.311(f).
27. Access driveways do not provide adequate room for fire apparatus access.
U.F.C. 10.207(g).
Building Department
28. Meet minimum code requirements at time of technical review.
29. Walkways in front of Nob Hill must be maintained at 5 feet width since the
occupant load exceeds 300. Obstructions from cart storage, columns and
possibly the room at the store fronts appear to present problems with the
requirement.
30. Ail stairs and exits shall comply with U.B.C and Handicapped codes.
To W~ i ~ May Cameerm, ~f, ~.~/~/
MY w£fe a~d I ~e ~m~ee~ea abou~ ~ere~e
iron,fie om C~-~ell Ave.
wh~ Ki~o-~ S~i~g e~ex' is r~deled.
~e ~k ~ha~ ~be S~o~i~g 0~er S~ bare
ma~re Drivew~ ~eeeas om Wbi~o4 Drive.
~meerely Yo~s,
~ 1}821i ~es~ ~:~bell Ave.
ITY OF MPBELL
70 NORTH FIRST STREET
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008
(408) 866-2100
Department: Planning
September 19, 1989
TO:
Mr. Kent Kirkorian
1820 W. Campbell Avenue
Campbell, CA 95008
FILE NO: S 89-13
160A - 1700 W. Campbell Avenue
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Remodel of an Existing Shopping Center
SITE & ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT TIME:
Date: Tuesday, September 26, 1989
Time: 8:00 a.m.
(or shortly thereafter)
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING:
Tuesday, September 26, 1989
7:30 p.m. (or shortly thereafter)
Please be advised that the Site and Architectural Review Committee of the
Campbell Planning Commission will review your plans for approval of the
above-referenced project at the indicated appointment time. The meeting will
be held in the Planning Conference Room, North Wing, City Hall, 70 N. First
Street, Campbell, California.
The Committee Chairman will then make a recommendation to the Planning
Commission at the Commission meeting which will be held at 7:30 p.m., on the
referenced date, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 70 N. First Street,
Campbell, California.
A copy of the Staff Report and the Agenda for the Planning Commission meeting
will be mailed to you on Friday, September 22~ 1989.
It is necessary that you, or an authorized representative, be present at both
the Site and Architectural Review Committee meeting and Planning Commission
meeting. If you have questions regarding this information, please contact the
Planning Office at (408) 866-2140.
Sincerely,
I-IAGA AN 'IATE$
ARCNITECTURE · PLANNING · INTERIORS
9-18-89
City of Campbell
Planning Department
70 North First St.
Campbell, CA 95008
attn: Mr. Steve Piasecki, Planning Director
ref: Kirkwood Shopping Center
Dear Steve;
We met with Tim Haley of your office last week to get an
up~l~~e comments so far on the proposed remodeling for
~~~pplng ~e~ter. ~He reiterated that there are no
major problems with the proposal, just some fine tuning of
certain elements that we need to address. He raised your
concerns about these items, and this letter is in response
to those concerns, to help answer these before the Planning
Commission meeting next week.
1. The location and details of the trash enclosures in the
rear service area were discussed, as well as any noise the
loading and trash compacting might generate.
The locations shown are similar to the existing compactor
locations, and also respond to the required truck turning
radii and the parking we show. In the past, Kent Kirkorian
installed the existing compactors and has provided for a
weekly pickup service, which has cleaned up this rear area
and has eliminated the 15 to 20 dumpsters that would be
required otherwise to serve the uses.
The locations of the compactors are where they are to be
convenient to the uses they serve, and to meet the tenants
standards and requirements. They will be enclosed with a
chain-link fence with redwood slats and gates. The entire
service area will be hidden from the neighboring properties
by a 10' high masonry wall with landscaping along the
southern border, as shown in the sketches we sent you a
couple of weeks ago.
The compactor to serve the office bldg. and the smaller
retail users located at the southwest corner, will be
enclosed by 6' high masonry walls completely blocking the
view to the public, and providing a partial sight barrier
from the residential street into the service area. The
location here is also for reasons of truck access to the
compactor, and to provide some extra parking and correct
turning radii for service trucks. This location makes sense
for these reasons. Obviously the final design of the
enclosure and walls is flexible, and can be fine-tuned.
114 SANTA MARGARITA
MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025
·(415) 325-5678
FAX (415) 325-1380
2. The masonry walls will be extended at the Nob Hill foods
to enclose the loading dock as shown in the sketches
previously sent to you. This will help shield the noise
from the loading activities. The new 10' high masonry wall
at the property line will also do the same.
3. Security and the problem of unauthorized dumping in the
service area was a concern, and you suggested controlled
access gates be considered at the service area. As Kent
Kirkorian has said, he has tried this elsewhere and it is
more a problem than a solution. Kent does not expect a big
problem back there, and if it does become one he has stated
his willingness to add some sort of monitoring,
surveillance, or security policing of the area should it
become necessary. He certainly does not want this area to
be a problem either, and suggests we wait and see.
4. The Architectural advisor had certain comments in regard
to the design. One was the issue of possibly tieing in the
office building with a mansard metal roof, and deleting the
second tower.
As you know, there are many ways to tie things in, and we
believe we have done so through the use of the same
materials, same colors, and a repetition of the stepping
parapets and tower. The reason for not hiding the office
building with another mansard is the desire to have an
identity of its own (to not be lost as another retail
store), but to still tie in to the overall concept. The
main tower at the corner of Nob Hill is the symbol and focal
point of the entire center, however the lower tower of
similar shape and materials at the office building is the
symbol for that different use; we want to visually state
that the corner is "special" and that it has 2 stories and a
landscaped roof deck. At the pedestrian level below, the
stepping parapets at the gutter are continuous and tie
across at the roof deck level, while the mansard breaks back
and away on both sides, giving it the connection but
allowing a maximum of light and air into the deck and second
floor level.
The Architectural advisor was also concerned that the design
might be too busy. This I suppose is a matter of opinion.
We feel that a building must work at both scales--at a
distance and also close up. There should be bold forms that
work as seen from the roadways and parking which orient the
user, and when up close a certain level of detail and
finesse should take over so that the design does not feel
cheap or too plain. We believe we have a nice balance to
the design, and the tile and light box accents will add to
the overall feeling of quality. The towers, the massing and
the color accent bands will create a bold coherent
impression from Campbell Ave.
5. The parking curb radii~ driveway locations, and bus
drop off dimensions will be fine tuned and modified as
appropriate, once we get underway with construction
documents, and once we get feedback from the Public Works
Department. We understand that the parking shown, and the
traffic report with its recommendations has been accepted by
the Public Works staff, and that the Public Works Director
is now reviewing and will contact us if there are any
further measures required.
We are working on another drawing which might help to
communicate the design better, a close up of the typical
arcade. We will also be elaborating on the design of the
area under the main tower, and the plaza in front of the
office building. This drawing will be dropped off to your
office later this week.
I hope this clarifies the issues at hand, and we appreciate
the opportunity to work with your office along the way.
Please contact me if you have any further comments that we
may address before the upcoming Planning Commission hearing.
Thank You.
~ery Truly Yours,
J~rry i'L~-. ~inge~ AIA
Partner
cc: Mr. Donald Wimberly-Public Works
I-tAGMA N A$$O...IATE$
ARCHITECTURE · PLANNING · INTERIORS
9-21-89
City of Campbell
Planning Department
70 North First St.
Campbell, CA 95008
attn: Mr. Steve Piasecki, Planning Director
ref: Kirkwood Shopping Center
Dear Steve;
Attached we are hand delivering to you three copies of a
section/perspective drawing of the typical arcade. This is
to further communicate our design intent as mentioned in my
letter of the 18th.
Would you please see that the architectural advisor gets a
copy of this along with the last letter; I would appreciate
it.
We will meet with the design committee on Tuesday morning,
and at that time will have a colored set of drawings for
their review and for presentation at the Planning Commission
that evening.
Thank You. Please call if you desire anything further.
yer.y Truly Yours,
J~r_ry'~. winges AIA
Partner
114 SANTA MARGARITA
MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025
· (415) 325-5678
FAX (415) 325-1380
CITY Oi gAMPBEtt
70 NORTH FIRST STREET
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008
(408) 866-2110 FAX (408) 379-2572
Department:
Planning
September 16, 1991
Mr. Kent Kirkorian
Ira Kirkorian Developments
1820 W. Campbell Avenue
Campbell, CA 95008
Re: Final Inspection - Kirkwood Plaza Remodel
S 89-13 - 1604-1700 W. Campbell Avenue
Dear Mr. Kirkorian:
The Planning Department has conducted a final inspection of the above
referenced project for the items typically reviewed by the Planning
Department. At the time of inspection, the following deficiencies or items
were noted:
Decorative or special paving had not been installed in the entry
driveway from West Campbell Avenue, nor near the walkway between
the Nob Hill Store and the pedestrian walkway along this driveway;
Landscaping of all planting areas had not been completed;
The designation of handicapped parking spaces and compact parking
spaces have not been completed;
A planting area at the rear of the Baskin-Robbins store along Whitwood
has not been installed, and a trash compactor has been installed in this
area, and
The sidewalk areas have not been completed in front of Kirkwood
Hardware and Nob Hill at the time of inspection.
If you should have any questions regarding any of the above items, please do
not hesitate to contact the undersigned.
Tim J. Hale'y'
Planner II
cc: Building Department
PRO.OF. OF PUBLICATION
750 RIDDER PARK DRIVE
SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA 95190
IN THE
CITY OF CAMPBELL
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
City of Campbell
NOTICE OF HEARINGS No (6125-EX)
rATE OF CALIFORNIA,
OUNTY OF SANTA CLARA) ss.
~ ~IK ~ I~ ~S al I~ ~
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ly ~ Santa ~tl. State el ~bl~. I~l a~ San ~ Me~ N~ k and was
~ to ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~ ~h
NOTICE OF HEARINGS
Notice im hereby ~l~ b~at U~e Planning ~
~,~ ~ff~, ~ T~y,
~ ~1 - R~ ~d E~ ~ K~-
2. M 8~16 (UP 8~11) · 531 ~ ~at Av~
- M S~f~ ~ ~y I~.. ~ ~
a ~ ~ U~ P~it to allow
lg~reNdendal ~ug treatment facility .
APN: 2~2 - ~t~ E~.
~ GPS~7. ~ ~eA~. ~ ~ ~
t - ~ ~ a ~N P~n
~t to ~ a ~ ~ ~ Ge~l PI~
.e~ ~ ~. ~: 27~12 ·
4. V ~- 176 ~ A~- R. ~-
V~ ~ ~ ~rd ~ to ~ a ~ngle
~ ~ to an e~s~ ~n~ng ~ngle
& ~~e)-~~n.
~ ~ . ~1 ~n AmOunt ~m
Profelllonal Office to Professional
~t P~ to al~ ~ ~m~ of a
~1 ~ ~ i~ ~ ~a~t ~m -
~ a PD ~a~ ~t/Prof~
~) Z~ ~ ~N: 3~31~3~ .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~anni~
~ ~ of ~ of ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ m ~ ~ of ~1 ~ing
~NNI~ ~MISSI~, ~ ~
6125-EX
15th September 89
~ ,, .cSey o[ .............. 1~ ...............................
..................................................................................
MEMORANDUM
To;
From:
Subject:
Bill Helms
Date:
Kirkorian Development Traffic Report
CITY OF CAMPBELl
September 6, 1989
I have reviewed the Kirkorian Traffic Report dated
August, 1989 and have the following comments:
The number of broadside and pedestrian accidents along
this section of Campbell Avenue strongly justifies a
median to control left turns in and out of properties
both on the south and north sides of Campbell Avenue.
The added trip generation from this project will lead to
even higher rates of accidents. I recommend that we
require a median to be constructed along the entire
length of the project with appropriate breaks to allow
turns to both the south and north driveways.
The report claims that striping a northbound right turn
lane on San Tomas Aquino Road at Campbell Avenue will
fully mitigate the added traffic at the intersection. I
completely agree. Northbound San Tomas Aquino Road is
one of the four critical movements at the intersection.
The on site circulation is very good with adequate
stacking, two-way aisles, and a reduction of the number
of driveways onto Campbell.
The acceleration lane from the main drive, combined as a
bus duckout, should be modified to be symmetrical with
the deceleration lane west of the driveway.
We have marked our copy of the site plan showing old
street light poles to be removed and new street lights
to be added. Current levels of lighting do not meet IES
standards on which we base our requirements.
I would like to see reconstructed sidewalks, curb and
gutter with the new project as well as dedication of
right of way for an eastbound right turn lane in the
future.
GEK: CMBLMEMO.193
NOTICE OF DETERNINATION
CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
Secretary for Rmsources
1416 Ninth St., Rm. 1311
Sacramento, CA 95814
Co~ty Clerk's Office
S~ta Clara Co~ty
191 N. First St.
Sa% Jose, CA 95113
Plaming Dapartm~nt
City of Campbell
70 N. First St.
Campbell, CA 95008
RE: Filing of Notice of Determination in C~lgliance with
Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Rasources Code.
(INfACT PERSCN:
PRDJECT LOCATI(1N:
(If Applicable)
Telephone:
(408) 866-2140
~,~-~.
This is to advise that the CITY OF CAMPBk~I. has made the follc~ring determinations
regarding the above described project:
DAT~ RECEIVED FOR FILING:
The project has been ~. approved by the City of Campbell.
[ ] disapproved by the City of Campbell.
The project [ ] will have significant effect on the environment:,.
~ will not have significant effect on the environment.
[ ] An Rnvironmental Impact Report was prepared for this project
pursuant to the provisions of CEQA.
~ A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant
to the provisions of CEQA.
The EIR or Negative Declaration and record of project approval
may be examined at the Planning Department, City of Campbell,
70 N. First St., Campbell, CA 9S008
~{i$ig~/tion.m~asures:. [. ] were made a condition of approval.
~' were not made a condition of approval.
A statement of Overriding Considerations [ ] was adopted for this project.
~1 was not adopted.
CITY Ol CAMPBULL
70 NORTH FIRST STREET
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008
(408) 866-2100
Planning
Department:
August 22, 1989
DECLARATION THAT AN ENIqRONMM~AL
IMPACT REPORT IS NOT REQUIRED
(NEGATIVE DECLARATION)
Kent Ki, rkori an
APPLICANT :
1820 West Campbell Ave
ADDRESS :
Campbell, CA 95008
S 89-13
FILE NO. :
1604 thru 1700 West Campbell
SITE ADDRESS :
Campbell, CA 95008
Pursuant to the applicable sections of the California Environmental
Quality Act of 1970 and City of Campbell Resolution No. 5164; and
After review of plans and infomation supplied by the applicant
pertaining to the captioned project, and after completing the
attached initial study, the undersigned does hereby detemine
that the captioned project will have no significant effect (no
substantial adverse impact) on the environment within the terms
and meaning of said Act and Resolution.
Executed at Campbell, California this 22 day of August
1989 .
70 NORTH
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
(408) 866-2100
FAX # (408) 379-2572
Planning
Department:
FIRST STREET
95OO8
August/-, 19~J9
Mr. Kent Kirkorian
1820 W. Campbel 1
Campbeli , CA 95008
RE: Our File # S 89-13
Site Address: 1604-1700 W. Campbell
Dear Mr. Kirkorian,
Pursuant to Section 65943 of the Government Code of the State of
California, please be advised that the Planning Department has made the
determination that the above-referenced application is:
XX
Accepted as completed.
Not Accepted - Incomplete.
(See attached list of what is
necessary to make the application
complete.)
An application will not be posted on the Planning Commission agenda until
it has been accepted as complete.
If you have questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to
contact the undersigned at (408) 866-2140.
Sincerely,
Steve Piasecki
Planning Director
** 1.
2.
3.
PERSPECTIVE/COLOR RENDERING OF PROPOSED PROJECT.
PHOTOGRAPHS OF SITE.
TITLE REPORT FOR PROPERTY.
id
Attachment
f: formlets
IT¥ OF CAMPBELL
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION
PLEASE NOTE: STAFF IS REQUIRED BY STATE LAW TO NOTIFY APPLICANTS OF THE COMPLETENESS OF THEIR APPLICATIONS.
ONLY THOSE APPLICATIONS WHICH ARE FOUND TO BE COMPLETE CAN BE POSTED ON A PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA.
PROPERTY LOCATION/ADDRESS:
DATE FILED: R-IO-Sg
1604 thru 1700 West Campbell Ave.
APN:
ZONING: C-1
GENERAL PLAN:
403-2-34
403-2-26
TYPE OF APPLICATION:
x
Architectural Approval
Planned Development Permit
General Plan Amendment
Other
Use Permit
Zone Change
Variance
APPL I CANT:
NAME: Ira Kirkorian Developments
ADDRESS: 1820 West Campbell Ave.
TELEPHONE: (408) 379-4547
CITY/STATE: Campbell, Calif. 95008 ZIP:
PROPERTY OWNER:
NAME: Marguerite Kirkorian
408 379-4547
TELEPHONE ( )
ADDRESS: Same as above
CITY/STATE: ZIP:
PLEASE ATTACHED SEPARATE SHEET FOR OTHERS THAT YOU WISH TO RECEIVE COPIES OF STAFF REPORTS & AGENDAS.
AFF I DAV I T/S I GNATURE (S):
The undersigned person(s), having an interest in the above-described property, hereby make this
application in accordance with the provisions of the Campbell Municipal Code; and, hereby certify
that the informa~iod given herein is true and correct to the best of my~our.kn~wledge and belief.
' ~/App~i c~ rit~ s YSi ghatu re Date P~y?~r St~ j , Date
O F F I C E U S E 0 N L ~_.~>~ /
PLANNING COMMISSION MTG. DATE: FEE PAID:
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: RECEIPT #:
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
DATE PUBLISHED IN NEWSPAPER:
PROPOSED USE:
City of Campbell - Planning Department - Steve Piasecki, Planning Director
70 N. First St., Campbell, CA 95008 (408) 866-2140
CONTRIBUTION DISCLOSURE FORM
CITY OF CAMPBELL
PLANNING COMMISSION
II.
[ ] IF CONTRIBUTIONS TOTALING $250 HAVE NOT BEEN MADE, CHECK HERE, AND SIGN BELOW IN SECTION III.
TO BE COMPLETED ONLY IF CONTRIBUTIONS TOTALING $250 OR MORE
HAVE BEEN MADE.
YOUR NAME: Kent Kirkorian
YOUR ADDRESS: 1820 West Campbell Ave.
C~mp~ll: ~l~f. 9~008
TELEPHONE NO: (408) 379-4547 ZIP:
APPLICATION #
PROJECT ADDRESS:1604 thru 1700 West Campbell Ave., Campbell, Calif. 95008
III.
LIST COMMISSION MEMBER(S) TO WHOM YOU AND/OR YOUR AGENT
MADE CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TOTALING $250 OR MORE, AND
THE DATES OF THOSE CONTRIBUTIONS.
NAME OF MEMBER: George Kasolas
NAME OF CONTRIBUTOR
(if other than yourself):
DATE(S): 9-2-88 9-21-88
AMOUNT(S): ~OO
i0-3-88 10-7-88
$4o Sz0
NAME OF MEMBER:
NAME OF CONTRIBUTOR
(if other than yourself):
DATE (S):
AMOUNT(S):
(2)
NAME OF MEMBER:
NAME OF CONTRIBUTOR
(if other than yourself):
DATE(S):
AMO~T (S):
~ignatu~ ~plicant/Agent)
(3)
August 10, 1989
(Date)
B-96- 4/21/81
NOTICE TO APPLICANTS
REGARDING EFFECT OF WASTEWATER
TREATMENT CAPACITY ON LAND
DEVELOPMENT A/~PROVALS PURSUAI~T TO
DEVELOPMENT OF APN
Please take notice that no vested right to a building permit
shall accrue as the result of the granting of any land development
approvals and applications. Pursuant to the adoption of Ordinance
9.045 by County Santitation District No. 4 of Santa Clara County,
the agency providing the above described parcel(s) with sewer
service, if the District's Manager and Engineer makes a deter-
mination that the issuance of a sewer connection permit to a
building, or proposed building, on the above described property,
will, in his opinion, cause the District to exceed its ability
to treat adequately the wastewater that would result from the
issuance of such connection permit, then said permit may not
be issued, and, hence, no building permit may be issued by
this agency.
If the sewer connection permit is issued, it may contain
substantive conditions designed to decrease the wastewater
associated with any land use approval.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
By signing below, the applicant acknowledges, at the time
of application, that he/she fully understands the above.
l_----'/~p fl-'~_a~' S ~gna t u r e --'
Site Address of Proposed
Development
Distribution:
Original to County Sanitation District No. 4
100 E. Sunnyoaks Ave., Campbell,
Copy to issuing City, Town or County
Copy to Applicant
CA
Campbell Planning Dept.
rile
TO:
CITY CLERK
PLEASE COLLECT AND RECEIPT
FOR THE FOLLOWING MONIES
PLANNING FILk NO.: ~___~ --/3
ADDRESS:
ITEM
AMOUNT
GENERAL PLANAMENDMENT
0-1 acres
1-5 acres
5+ acres
ZONE CHANGE
0-1 acres
1-5 acres
5+ acres
TEXT AMENDMENT
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
0-2 acres
2-5 acres
5+ acres
(Modifications of Approval)
(Revised Development Schedule)
USE PERMIT
Garage Conversions, Occupancy Requirement
w/o Development Plans, Liquor Licenses,
Dwelling Units, Interim Zone
Ail Other Use Permits
(Modifications or Amendments)
ARCHITECTURAL APPROVAL
0-1.0,000 s.f. of construction
~'000-75,000 s.f. of construction
- 75,000+ s.f. of construction
If no construction associated w/ project
(Modifications)
(Extensions of Approval)
Single Family
VARIANCES
Single Family Residence
Ail Others
SIGN PERMITS
Permits - Minimum of $50 or 1% of estimated
valuation
Penalty for not securing a permit
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW - Account #3371
OTHER
Maps - $5.00; General Plan Text - $5.00;
Zoning Ordinance - $12.00; Copies
Refundable Deposit - Account #3521
Secondary
$1.00/page
TOTAL
$1,150.00
1,500.00
2,300.00
1,040.00
1,150.00
1,730.00
475.00
1,150.00
1,500.00
1,730.00
290.00
175.00
400.00
1,150.00
150.00
575.00
875.00
1,150.00
575.00
150.00
85.00
100.00
300.00
400.00
50.00
50.00
100.00
NAME
ADDRESS
FOR
CITY CLERK
ONLY
RECEIPT NO. ~q~
AMOUNT PAID ~~
RECEIVED BY o_~
DATE ~ .//- ~$'
PHONE
ZIP
f: RECEIPT
ENV i RONNIENTAL I NIPACT ASSESSIV~NT
ENVIBONME~NTAL CHECKLIST ~ BE USED BY THE CITY OF CAMPBELL IN IVLAKING )INITIAL STUDY
BAC~
TELEPHONE: ( )
DATE OF CHECKLIST SUBMITTED:
AGENCY REQUIRING CHECKLIST:
NAME OF PROPOSAL (IF APPLICABLE):
L
!1.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMI=ACTS
{E~3=~LANATIONS OF ALL YES A3~ID I~YBE ANSERS ARE I~EQUIRED ON ATTACHED SHEET)
YES MAYBE NO
1. EARTH. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in changes in
geologic substructures? []
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil? []
c. Change in topography or ground surface relief
features? []
d. The destruction, covering or modification of
any unique geologic or physical features? []
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of
soils, either on or.~ff ~he site? []
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean
or any bay, inlet or lake? []
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides,
mudslides, ground failure, or similar
hazards?
1 of 6 pages
YES MAYBE: NO
2. AIR. Will proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of
ambient air quality?
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture or tempera-
ture, or any change in climate, either locally
or regionally?
3. WATER. Will the proposal result in:
a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood
waters?
d. ~Change in the amount of surface water in any
water body?
Discharge into surface waters, or in any altera-
tion of surface water quality, including but not
limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity?
Alteration to the direction or rate of flow
of ground waters?
Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations?
Substantial reduction in the amount of water
otherwise available for public water supplies?
Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding or tidal waves?
ge
4. PLANT LIFE. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species or number
of any species of plants (including trees,
shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic
plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of plants into an
area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment
of existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop?
[]
[]
o
o
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[] [] ~'
[] [] ~
2 of 6 pages
YE:S MAyE31~ NO
5. ANIMAL LIFE.
Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic
organisms, insects or microfauna) ?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare
or endangered species of animals?
c. Introduction of new species of animals into an
area, or result in a barrier to the migration
or movement of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habi tat ?
6. NOISE. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
7. LIGHT AND GLARE. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare?
10.
11.
12.
LAND USE. Will the proposal result in a substantial
alteration of the present or planned land use of an
area?
9. NATURAL RESOURCES. Will the proposal result in:
Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
Substantial depletion of any nonrenewable
natural resource?
RISKOF UPSET. Does the proposal involve a risk
of an explosion or the release of hazardous sub-
stances (including, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event
of an accident or upset conditions?
POPULATION. Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate of the human
population of an area?
HOUSING. Will the proposal affect existing housing,
or create a demand for additional housing?
o
o
[]
[]
D
D
[]
O
[]
D
[]
o
[]
[]
3 of 6 pages
YE:$ MAYB£ NO
13.. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular
movement.
b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or
demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation
systems?
d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation
or movement of people and/or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians?
14.
PUBLIC SERVICES. Will the proposal have an effect
upon, or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the following areas:
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads?
f. Other governmental services?
15. ENERGY. Will the proposal result in:
Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy?
Substantial increase in demand upon existing
sources of energy, or require the development
of new sources of energy?
16.
UTILITIES. Will the proposal result in a need
for new systems, or substantial alterations to
the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
f. Solid waste and disposal?
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
O
O
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[3
D
D
[]
[]
[]
D
4 of 6 pages
Y~S ~ MA¥~ NO
17. HUMAN HEALTH. Will the proposal result in:
18.
19.
20.
Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards?
AESTHETICS. Will the proposal result in the
obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the
public, or will the proposal result in the creation
of an aesthetically offensive site open to public
view?
RECREATION. Will the proposal result in an impact
upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational
opportunities?
ARCHEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL. Will the proposal result
in an alteration of a significant archeological or
historical site, structure, object or building?
21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a. Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant
or animal or eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or prehistory? []
b. Does the project have the potential to achieve
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals? (A short-term impact on
the environment is one which occurs in a rela-
tively brief, definitive period of time while
long-term impacts will endure well into the
future.) []
c. Does the project have impacts which are indiv-
idually limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(A project may impact on two or more separate
resources where the impact on each resource
is relatively small, but where the effect of
the total of those impacts on the environment
is significant.) []
d. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly or indirectly? []
[] []
5 of 6 pages
i ! I . DISG~J$$1ON OF ENVIRO6~CT4TAI. E'VALUATIC~I
g
IV. DE:TERMINATION
AF'TE~ R~'VII~WING THI~ ENVIRONMENTAL. INF'O~ATION SUBMITTED BY THE
APPLICANT, AND AId'TieR COMPLETING TI.I~ ENVll~ONMI~NTAL CHECKLIST USE
BY TI-i~ CITY OF CAMPBELl. IN MAKING AN ~NVII~ONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
I find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION
will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a
significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because the miti-
gation measures described on an attached sheet have
been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION
WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect
on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
is required.
DATE
6 of 6 pages
EIR-1
CI OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
INITIAL STUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM - TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
Date Filed: 8-10-89
GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Name and address of developer or project sponsor: ~
Kent Kirkorian Builder - 1820 West Campbell Ave., Campbell, Calif. 95008
Address of project: 1604 Thru 1700 West Campbell Ave., Campbell, Calif. 95008
Assessor's Block and Lot Number 403-2-34 and 403-2-25
Name, address, and telephone number of person to be contacted
concerning this project:
Kent Kirkorian - 408-379-4547
Indicate number of the permit application for the project to which
this form pertains:
List and describe any other related permits and other public
approvals required for this project, including those required
by. city, regional, state and federal agencies:
6. Existing zoning district: c-1
7. Proposed use of site (Project for which this form is filed):
Retail Commercial
PROJECT DESCRIPTION (ATTACHED ADDITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY)
8. Site size. -Approx. 410,000 sq. ft. including hardware parcel.
9. Square footage. See attachment "A".
10. Number of floors of construction. One and two story buildings.
11. Amount of off-street parking provided. See attachment "B".
12. Attach plans.
13. Proposed scheduling.
14. Associated projects.
15. Anticipated incremental development.
Phase I - Construct Retail Building "B" and "C" plus office space.
Phase II- Nob Hill Foods and part of Building "B" (Printing Shop).
- Commencement immediately following approval & permit
process.
1 of 3 pages
16. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit
sizes, range of sale prices or rents and type of household
size expected.
17. If co,,-,,ercial, indicate the type, whether neighborhood, city
or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and
loading facilities.
18. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift
and loading facilities. '
19. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employ-
ment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and
community benefits to be derived from the project.
20.
If the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning
application, state this and indicate clearly why the application
is required.
Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects?
Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as
necessary).
Yes No
x 21.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
22'.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
Change in existing features of any bays, tidelands,
beaches, lakes or hills, or substantial alteration
of ground contours.
Change in scenic views or vistas from existing
residential areas or public lands or roads.
Change in pattern, scale or character of general
area of project.
Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in
vicinity.
Change in ocean, bay, lake, stream or ground water
quality or quanity, or alteration of existing drain-
age patterns.
Substantial change in existing noise or vibration
levels in the vicinity.
Site on filled land or on slope,of 10% or more.
Use of disposal of potentially hazardous materials,
such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives.
Substantial change in demand for municipal services
(police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)
Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption
(electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.)
Relationship to a larger project or series of projects
Future redevelopment of Kfrkwood l~iaza Shopping Center. '
2 of 3 pages
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
33. Describe the project site as it exists before the project,
including information on topography, soil stability, plants
and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspecgs.
Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use
of the structures. Attach photoEraphs of the site. Snapshots
or polaroid photos will be accepted.
34. Describe the surrounding properties, including information
on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic
aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial,
etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses,
shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development
(height, frontage, set-back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photo-
graphs of the vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be
accepted.
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the'
attached exhibits present the data and information required for
this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the
facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct
to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date ~igh~3h~ez ~ '
For
3 of 3 pages
KIRKWOOD PLAZA
ADDITIONAL ORMATION TO BE PROVIDED FOR A TECTURAL
APPROVAL BY CAMPBELL PLANNING COMMISSION
A. Lot Size - indicate:
410,000 I. Gross lot area. Approximate sq. ft.
N.A__. 2. Net lot area (after any required dedication to the City).
B. Floor Area -Commercial/Office/Industrial Projects (if applicable),
indicate:
118.029 1. Gross floor area - by each floor and total building. (approx.)
11~9 2. Net leasable floor area - by each floor and total building. (approx.)
C. Residential Project Information (if applicable), indicate:
1. Number of units.
2. Square footage of individual units.
3. Number of bedrooms per unit.
D. parking - indicate the number of parking stalls as follows:
Standard: 382
Compact: 135
Handicapped'~ 15
2. Covered: 6
Uncovered: 526
..... Total: 532
E. Site Utilization - indicate:
..... Total: 532
1. Approximate
Building coverage
Landscaping Coverage
Paving Coverage
Total ...
Sq. Ft. Percentage
1
.1!1~000 27%
56.000 17.5 z
243.000 :59.5
aln nnn 100%
Surrounding Land Uses - indicate land uses surrounding site
as follows:
1. Front .......... Retail/Office/Residential
2. Left Side ...... Retail/Office
3. Right Side
..... Retail
4. Rear
........... Residential/Automotive
C. photographs-- Provide photographs of the property and the adjacent
properties. Indicate the subject of each photo.
See attachment Board 5
f: Checklist
1 Exclude covered walkway.
2 Includes hardscape.
IRA KIRKORIAN
DEVELOPMENTS
1820 WEST CAMPBELL AVENUE
CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 95008
(408) 379-4547
August 8, 1989
City of Campbell
70 N. First St.
Campbell, Calif. 95008
Re: Kirkwood Plaza Shopping Center
Dear Members of the Planning Commission:
On January 24, 1989 you granted approval for a combined retail and office
building to be built in place of the Round House Delicatesen. Since that
time we were approached and entered into an agareement with Nob Hill to
build a new updated market in our center.
Because their existing premises was too small and lacked sufficient parking
Nob Hill felt that in order to compete with the new Westgate Super Safeway
Store, Alpha Beta, and other new stores in the area that they needed a new
market. The plans call for a full line of groceries, bakery, deli, floral
shop, juice bar, fish & meat and an extensive produce section. The market
will be geared to the Twenty-first century and capable of serving the needs
of the people of Campbell.
Since your approval on January 24th we have undertaken a traffic study and
have layed out a new parking scheme together with modifications to the
driveway entrances - the study showed that at worst impact the traffic
would not be difficult to handle. As per plans submitted the Center would
be demolished from Kirkwood Hardware to Renzo's and new retail buildings
would be built with our offices on a second floor section as shown on the
plans.
With the expansion of Westgate and other centers in the adjoining San Jose
area we must change to exist. Kirkwood Plaza was developed in 1964 it is
old and tired - we need a new vital center to compete. A new Nob Hill
Super Market will bring foot traffic, revitalize the area, and keep the
Campbell consumer in Campbell where they belong.
The architectual firm retained by us will be working on plans to update the
entire Center when this expansion is completed. We are also in the process
of revitalizing Kirkwood Village our apartment complex. New fire retardant
roofs, gutters, painting, and new landscapping are all taking place. It is
our desire to have one of the best looking commercial complexes and we ask
for your assistance and support so that we can maintain an attractive but
still competetive environment in Campbell.
~E~T ~f~R~OR~AN
COMMERCIAL - INDUSTRIAL - APARTMENTS
I-IA / AN a$$ocla'
ATTACHMENT A
KIRKWOOD PLAZA
SQUARE FOOTAGE ANALYSIS
PROPOSED USES
BUILDING NAME
EST.
RETAIL STORAGE OFFICE
TOTAL
FABRICLAND
KIRKWOOD HARDWARE
NOB HILL FOODS
RETAIL BUILDING A
RETAIL BUILDING B
RETAIL BUILDING C
RENZOS
ICECREAM
13,180 2,000
19,430 3,000
33,300 5,000
10,500 2,625
3,774 1,060
6,160 1,540
7,200 1,800
450 450
6,560
15,180 E
22,430 E
38,300
13,125
11,394
7,700
9,000 E
900 E
SUBTOTAL
93,994 17,475 6,560
TOTAL SQ. FT. 118,029 SQ.FT.
I-.IA~,MAN A$$OCIA', .,
ATTACHMENT B
KIRKWOOD PLAZA
PARKING ANALYSIS
PROPOSED USES
BUILD. PARKING PARKING PARKING
BUILDING NAME SQ.FT. RATIO REQD. PROVIDED
NOTES
FABRICLAND ~1~5,T[80 200
KIRKWOOD HARDWARE 22,430 200
NOB HILL FOODS 38,300 200
RETAIL BUILDING A 13,125 200
BUILDING B OFFICE 6,560 225
BUILDING B RETAIL 4,834 200
RETAIL BUILDING C 7,700 200
ICE CREAM STORE 900 200
RENZOS REST. 9,000 1PER3
TOTAL SQ. FT.
TOTAL PARKING
REQD.
76
112
192
66
29
24
39
5
83
625
1 SPACE PER 3 SEATS
TOTAL PARKING
PROVIDED
532
TRAFFIC STUDY FOR:
A PROPOSED RENOVATION OF THE KIRKWOOD SHOPPING CENTER
AT
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CAMPBELL AVENUE
AND SAN TOMAS AQUINO ROAD
IN
THE CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
COMPLETED FOR:
IRA KIRKORIAN DEVELOPMENT
AUGUST, 1989
Wilson Engineering
70 Zoe Street, Suite 200
San Franciscoi CA 94107
(415) 974-5071
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1)
INTRODUCTION
Page
1
2) PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1
3)
EXISTING SETTING
Local Access
1
1
4) IMPACTS
Trip Generation
Trip Distribution
Capacity Analysis
On Site Circulation
4
7
7
16
5) MITIGATION
17
6) BIBLIOGRAPHY
17
7)
APPENDICES
A) Level of Service Calculations
B) Traffic Counts
A-1
B-1
1)
PROJECT LOCATION
LIST OF FIGURES
Paqe
2
2) PROPOSED SITE PLAN
3
3) EXISTING P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC AT CENTER DRIVEWAYS
8
4) FUTURE P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC AT CENTER DRIVEWAYS
9
5)
P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC AT THE INTERSECTION OF
CAMPBELL AVENUE/SAN TOMAS AQUINO ROAD
10
LIST OF TABLES
1) EXISTING PROJECT AREA TRIP GENERATION
5
2) RENOVATED CENTER AREA TRIP GENERATION
6
3)
4)
5)
DESCRIPTION OF LEVELS OF SERVICE FOR
SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
DESCRIPTION OF LEVELS OF SERVICE FOR
UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
P.M. PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE
12
14
15
ii
1) INTRODUCTION
This report has been prepared to determine and analyze the
traffic related impacts which would accompany a proposed
renovation of the Kirkwood Shopping Center in the City of
Campbell. The operating characteristics of the existing roadway
network serving the proposed site are reviewed. Estimates of
increased site trip generation associated with the proposed
renovation are provided. Roadway conditions are re-evaluated
under conditions which assume completion of the proposed project.
The ability of site driveways to accommodate project traffic is
evaluated. On site vehicle circulation is reviewed, and finally,
traffic mitigation measures are suggested where warranted.
2) PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project would consist of the renovation of the
existing Kirkwood Shopping Center in the southwest quadrant of
the intersection of Campbell Avenue and San Tomas Aquino Road in
the City of Campbell as indicated in Figure 1. The project, as
proposed, consisting of renovating an existing shopping center
including the addition of approximately 6,560 square feet of
office space, 2,155 square feet of retail space and a new major
anchor tennant. The project would also include major changes to
existing driveway access and the on site circulation network.
Access to the area being renovated would include a total of two
driveways to Campbell Avenue and two driveways to San Tomas
Aquino Road. The proposed on site circulation network and
parking layout are shown in Figure 2.
3) EXISTING SETTING
Local Access: Local access is provided to the project site
by Campbell Avenue adjacent to the northerly edge of the site and
San Tomas Aquino Road adjacent to the easterly edge of the site
as indicated in Figure 2. Campbell Avenue is a major two way
roadway extending east and west across the City of Campbell as
indicated in Figure 1. Campbell Avenue is fully improved
adjacent to the project site with two through lanes in each
1
.,9
PROJECT SITE
4V
PROJECT LOCATION
THE WILSON ENGINEERING COMPANY
DRAWN BY
CHECKED
JOB NAME
SCALE No Scale
DATE
FIGURE
NO.
3
direction separated by a two way left turn lane. Curbs, gutters
and sidewalks are present on both sides of Campbell Avenue in the
project vicinity. Campbell Avenue currently experiences a two
way p.m. peak hour traffic volume of approximately 2600 vehicles
just west of San Tomas Aquino Road.
San Tomas Aquino Road is a more minor roadway in the City of
Campbell extending northerly and southerly from the project site
through residential areas of the City. San Tomas Aquino Road is
fully improved for the most part with curbs, gutters, sidewalks
and two thru lanes in each direction in the project vicinity.
Exclusive left turn lanes are provided at major intersections.
The intersection of Campbell Avenue and San Tomas Aquino Road is
controlled with traffic signals. Left turn project access is
allowed to and from existing project driveways on both Campbell
Avenue and San Tomas Aquino Road.
3) IMPACTS
Trip Generation: Trips which would be generated by the
proposed renovation and existing on site uses were estimated
using Institute of Transportation Engineers trip generation rates
for retail and office uses. Estimates of the number of daily,
a.m., and p.m. peak hour trips currently generated by the site,
assuming existing retail uses, are shown in Table 1. Estimates
of the number of trips which are forecast to be generated by the
project site after the renovations are completed and a new anchor
tennant is obtained are summarized in Table 2. Review of Table 1
will indicate existing on site uses are estimated to generate
3,855 trips per day. Of these, 64 are estimated to be inbound
and 25 outbound during the a.m. peak hour. Existing on site uses
are estimated to generate 182 inbound trips and 157 outbound
trips during the p.m. peak hour as shown in Table 1.
Review of Table 2 will indicate the project site, when the
renovations are completed, is forecast to generate 6,368 trips
per day. Of these, 71 are forecast to be inbound and 23 outbound
during the a.m. peak hour and 259 inbound and 245 outbound during
the p.m. peak hour. The trip estimates for the renovated project
TABLE 1
EXISTING PROJECT AREA TRIP GENERATION
Use
Size3
ADT1
A.M. Peak Hour1 P.M. Peak Hour1
Inbound/Outbound Inbound/Outbound
Specialty
Retail
Hardware
76,880 3,127 65/28 141/141
22,430 1,150 17/7 55/55
Subtotal
(-30% Capture
Passby Trips)2
4,277 82/35 196/196
(1,283) (25/11) (59/59)
Net Retail Oriented Trips 2,994
Restaurant 9,000 861
Total Trips
57/24 137/137
7/1 45/20
3,855 64/25 182/157
1
2
3
Based upon Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation
Rates, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1987.
Capture of existing traffic on Campbell Avenue or San Tomas Aquino
Road which stops at the Kirkwood Center as part of a multipurpose
trip.
Square feet of floor space
TABLE 2
RENOVATED CENTER AREA TRIP GENERATION
Use
Size3
ADT1
A.M. Peak Hour1 P.M. Peak Hour1
Inbound/Outbound Inbound/Outbound
Specialty
Retail
Hardware
Grocery
40,735 1,657 35/15 75/75
22,430 1,150 17/7 55/55
38,300 4,807 15/6 172/166
Subtotal
(-30% Capture
Passby Trips)2
7,614 67/28 302/296
(2,284) (20/8) (91/89)
Net Retail Trips
5,330 47/20 211/207
Office 6,560 177 17/2 3/18
Restaurant 9,000 861 7/1 45/20
Total Renovated
Center Traffic
(-Existing Center Traffic)
6,368 71/23 259/245
(3,855) (64/25) (182/157)
Net Project Traffic
2,513 7/(2) 77/88
1
Based upon Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation
Rates, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1987.
Capture of existing traffic on Campbell Avenue or San Tomas Aquino
Road which would stop at the Kirkwood Center as part of a
multipurpose trip.
Square feet of floor area.
6
take into account the increased trip generation associated with
the proposed new anchor tennant (Nob Hill Foods) as well as
increases in specialty retail floor space and new office space.
The estimates do not provide any discount in trip generation from
the shopping area on the northerly side of Campbell Avenue which
might occur when the existing Nob Hill Foods store relocates to
the renovated Kirkwood Center. The analysis in this report
assumes that another grocery store or similarly intense traffic
generator would occupy that location when the Nob Hill Food store
relocates.
Further review of Table 2 will indicate that the increase in
traffic associated with the proposed project when existing site
related traffic (Kirkwood Center) is accounted for, is forecast
to be 2,513 trips per day. Of these, 77 additional trips would
be inbound and 88 outbound during the p.m. peak hour.
Trip Distribution: Peak hour trips which would be generated
by the renovated center were distributed to the surrounding
roadway network based upon existing center related travel
patterns. Figure 3 shows existing p.m. peak hour traffic at the
center driveways and the percent of total center traffic that
each movement accounts for. Figure 4 shows forecast p.m. peak
hour traffic volumes at project driveways assuming the renovated
center with the new anchor tennant without any discount for
capture of existing trips on Campbell Avenue or San Tomas Aquino
Road. These vehicles would still be required to utilize project
driveways to and from the site.
The assignment of the net increase in p.m. peak hour traffic
associated with the renovation at the intersection of Campbell
Avenue and San Tomas Aquino Road is shown in Figure 5. The
distribution of traffic at this intersection was based upon
existing travel patterns.
Capacity Analysis: The City of Campbell identified the
intersection of Campbell Avenue and San Tomas Aquino Road and
project driveways to Campbell Avenue as having the potential to
be impacted by the proposed project during the p.m. peak hour.
The analysis focused on the p.m. peak hour to provide worst case
LEGEND
000 = Existing DriVeway Traffic } -
00% = Percent of Total Driveway Traffic \_
10% 15%
20 ~ 8 7% ~ Campbell Ave.
18% ,
~ V Service
5 24 2 20
I 21
5% ~ ~ J 19%
Kirkwo°d Center 8
i 12%
~ 0
4% 0%
24%
i 21
~ ~ 19%
o o
DRAWN ~¥ DATE
EXISTING P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC AT CENTER
DRIVEWAYS
JO_~ N,C, ME FI{~URE
NO.
T~E WILSON ENGINEERING COMPANY "
$¢~'~E No Scale
8
63 ~ 25 ~ Campbell Ave.
~ V ~ V ServiceI
~ F ~ F Station
10 53 3 43
67
Kirkwood Center 18
42
0
m ~ '66
oo
DRAWN ~Y DATE
FUTURE P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC AT CENTER
CMECKE5 BY
DRIVEWAYS
JOB NAME FIGURE
NO.
~H~ WI~ON ~NGINEERING COMPANY ~
SCA;E NO Scale
9
~ m m i? 126
' ,< 807 (14)
~! 277 (4)
(4) 204
(19) 1099 ~ ,
(4) 138
LEGEND
000 = Existing P.M. Peak Hour Traffic
(000) = Project Relatdd P.M. Peak Hour Traffic
DRAWN BY DATE
P.M. PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC AT THE INTERSECTION
CHECKED E~Y
OF SAN TOMAS AQUINO ROAD/ CAMPBELL AVENUE
JOB NAME FIGURE
NO.
TH£ WILSON ENGIN££RING COMPANY 5
SCALE No Scale
10
conditions when the center would be generating peak traffic
volumes coupled with peak commute volumes on surrounding
roadways. To further ensure a worst case scenario for the
capacity analysis, as stated earlier, no reduction in traffic on
surrounding roadways was included to account for the relocation
of the Nob Hill Food store. It was assumed that the existing
store site on the north side of Campbell Avenue would be occupied
by a similar type traffic generator.
Impacts to intersections and driveways were evaluated in the
form of Level of Service (LOS) analyses which provide a
standardized method of rating the operating characteristics of an
intersection or driveway. An LOS is a qualitative description of
an intersection's quality of operation based upon delay and
maneuverability. LOS can range from A, representing free flow
conditions, to F representing jammed conditions. In this report,
the Transportation Research Board's 1985 Highway Capacity Manual
methodology for calculating LOS based upon the average vehicle
delay for signalized intersections (Campbell/San Tomas Aquino
Road) and reserve capacity for unsignalized intersections
(project driveways), was employed. The possible LOS together
with their respective descriptions for signalized intersections
are shown in Table 3. LOS with respective descriptions for
unsignalized intersections are summarized in Table 4.
The projected p.m. peak hour LOS and average vehicle delay
for the intersection of Campbell Avenue and San Tomas Aquino Road
assuming (1) existing traffic conditions, and (2) existing plus
project conditions are provided in Table 5. Also shown in Table
5 is the relative increase in average vehicle delay due to the
proposed project at the intersection.
The City of Campbell defines an impact as being significant
if project traffic increases the average vehicle delay by one or
more percent in cases where the intersection is already operating
at an LOS E or F.
Review of Table 5 will indicate the proposed project is
forecast to have a significant impact at the intersection of
Campbell Avenue and San Tomas Aquino Road as determined by the
11
TABLE 3
DESCRIPTION OF LEVELS OF SERVICE FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
LEVEL STOPPED DELAY
OF PER VEHICLE
SERVICE DESCRIPTION (SECONDS)
A
B
C
D
E
Level-of-service A describes operations
with very low delay, i.e., less than
5.0 sec. per vehicle. This occurs when
vehicle progression is extremely favorable,
and most vehicles arrive during the green
phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all.
Short signal cycle lengths may also
contribute to low delay.
Less
than
5.0
Level-of-service B describes operations
with delay in the range of 5.1 to 15.0
sec. per vehicle. This generally occurs
with good vehicle progression and/or short
signal cycle lengths. More vehicles stop
than for LOS A, causing higher levels of
average delay.
5.1
to
15.0
Level-of-service C describes operations
with delay in the range of 15.1 to 25.0
sec. per vehicle. These higher delays
may result from fair progression and/or
longer cycle lengths. The number of
vehicles stopping is significant at this
level, although many still pass through the
intersection without stopping.
15.1
to
25.0
Level-of-service D describes operations 25.1
with delay in the range of 25.1 to 40.0 to
sec. per vehicle. At level D, the 40.0
influence of congestion becomes more
noticeable. Longer delays may result from
some combination of unfavorable progression
or long signal cycle lengths. Many
vehicles stop, and the proportion of
vehicles not stopping declines.
Level-of-service E describes operations
with delay in the range of 40.1 to 60.0
sec. per vehicle. This is considered to
be the limit of acceptable delay. These
high delay values generally indicate poor
progression and long cycle lengths.
40.1
to
60.0
12
TABLE 3 (CONTINUED)
DESCRIPTION OF LEVELS OF SERVICE FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
LEVEL
OF
SERVICE
F
DESCRIPTION
STOPPED DELAY
PER VEHICLE
(SECONDS)
Level-of-service F describes operations
with delay in excess of 60.0 sec. per
vehicle. This is considered to be
unacceptable to most drivers. This
condition often occurs with oversaturation,
i.e., when arrival flow rates exceed the
capacity of the intersection.
Greater
than
60.0
Source: Highway Capacity Manual, TRB Special Report 209, 1985
13
TABLE 4
DESCRIPTION OF LEVELS OF SERVICE
FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS
RESERVE
LEVEL CAPACITY
OF (VEHICLES
SERVICE DESCRIPTION PER HOUR)
A
Little or no delay
Greater
than
400
B Short traffic delay 300 to
400
C Average traffic delay 200 to
299
D Long traffic delays 100 to
199
E Very long traffic delays 0 to
99
F a a
a
When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lane,
extreme delays will be encountered with queuing which may
cause severe congestion affecting other traffic movements
in the intersection. This condition usually warrants
improvement to the intersection.
Source: Hiqhway Capacity Manual, TRB Special Report 209, 1985
14
TABLE 5
P.M. PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE
Location.
Movement
Existing Existing
Delayl LOS + Project
or Delayl LOS
Reserve or
Capacity Reserve
Capacity
% Inc.2
Delay
East Dwy
WB Left
NB Dwy
491 A 436 A
356 B 338 B
West Dwy
WB Left
NB Dwy
504 A 453 A
287 C 242 C
Campbell/
San Tomas
Aquino
49.9 E ~ 54.0 E 8.2
1 Average Vehicle Delay in Seconds at Signalized Intersection
or Reserve Capacity in vehicles at driveways
2 Percent Increase in Average Vehicle Delay at Signalized
Intersection
WB Left = Westbound left turn from Campbell Avenue into the
center
NB Dwy = Outbound on Project driveway to either east or
westbound Campbell Avenue
15
City of Campbell's criteria. The intersection is forecast to
realize an 8.2 percent increase in average vehicle delay as a
result of the renovation when currently operating at an LOS E
during the evening peak hour (4:30 to 5:30 p.m.).
Further review of Table 5 will indicate both driveways to
Campbell Avenue are forecast to continue to operate at an
acceptable LOS during the p.m. peak hour or worst case condition.
Review of Table 5 will indicate the most easterly driveway to
Campbell Avenue currently operates at an LOS A/B during the p.m.
peak hour and is forecast to continue to do so when the center is
renovated and Nob Hill Foods becomes the anchor tennant. The
westerly driveway or main driveway to Campbell Avenue currently
operates at an LOS A/C during the p.m. peak hour and is forecast
to continue to do so when the renovation is completed. The LOS A
movements are left turns from westbound Campbell Avenue into the
shopping center. The LOS B and LOS C movements are exit
movements from the center to Campbell Avenue. It should also be
noted that the maneuver forecast to operate the worst, the exit
maneuver from the westerly driveway to Campbell Avenue at LOS C,
has a projected reserve capacity of 242 vehicles. This means
that even if existing patterns of use of driveways were to alter
significantly and most project traffic was to exit the site using
this driveway, it would still operate satisfactorily under worst
case p.m. peak hour conditions.
On Site Circulation: The proposed on site circulation
system and parking layout are shown in Figure 2. Review of
Figure 2 will indicate significant changes to the existing layout
are proposed. The main, or westerly, driveway has been modified
to bring vehicles on to the site and away from Campbell Avenue
before being able to turn into parking aisles. This should allow
the entrance to function considerably better than the existing
configuration. The potential for entering vehicles being forced
to queue into Campbell Avenue while waiting for a vehicle to
enter or exit a parking space will be removed. Exiting vehicles
will have a place to queue without blocking access to parking
spaces.
16
The onsite circulation network is proposed to be altered by
providing clearly delineated aisles with angled parking. Most
aisles would remain two-way to promote maximum flexibility.
However, the parking spaces would be angled to allow easy access
to spaces in the form of right turn maneuvers. The potential for
left turns across opposing traffic flows into parking spaces
would be virtually eliminated.
Overall, the proposed alterations to the existing on site
circulation and parking layout should result in a significant
improvement in on site traffic flows.
5) MITIGATION
A new exclusive right turn lane should be striped on the
southbound approach of San Tomas Aquino Road at Campbell Avenue
to mitigate project related impacts at that location associated
with increased vehicle delay.
6)
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1) Kruger, Gary, City Traffic Engineer, City of Campbell,
Personal communication, 1989.
2)
Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation,
1987.
3) McTrans, Computerized LOS Analysis, 1988.
4)
Winges, Jerry, Project Architect, Hagman Associates,
written and personal communications, 1989.
5)
Traffic Data Service, Miscellaneous Traffic Counts,
1989.
17
APPENDIX A
Level of Service Calculations
A-1
T !::;~ A F F T (3
F' R 0 H
L A NiF- i
L.. S F,:
V C).L ..... i"iiF; A L..i.._ (.3 C A"7 10 N T {ii L :A N E
EASt "::"::::..., ,_, 0 ,:-)_
~7:,.-~ ,.., icl .L () C) ,_, .z,
W E E; 'T' c'} 6 9 .-!'; 0
L A NiE 2
L c.
L A N E 3
k ::i:
L 1:74 i',.i,~ 4
L '.--5 R
65"..2 C' 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 E:, 0 0 O
I:RAFF I ii:]
FF.:CM
'E;OIjTH
W E S T
RESERVE'. CAF'ACiTY
l_E.- ....... P,F om.,--, -.-' I
RESERVE CAF'AC i_'TY
t_EVEL OF SEF.:V iC:E
RESEF:;.'.VE CAF'ACI TY
L.. E V E L (3 F S E R".,," i iS E
JNS i Gi'-.iAL t Z ET}
LANE
242
C
LANE
LANE 4
STREET - EAST/ WEST
V C!i_ iJ HIE' S ~ GE Oi~ilE'i"R '7'
il Z; W B N iE:', '-'¥-' : E B ...... H R S B
L"F 277 '20.d- ...... 1 ~A .._,':r ,-',.... i : I_ 12, (":'_ k :i. 2, ,:l:'. k :L 2.0 L i .~."'"'. ,3_
TH 807 i099 438 69'7 : 'r 12.C' '!- 12.0 T i2.ili T ].2.'0
RT 1 ;,2.5 iL :38 215 109 : 'T'R i 2,0 -.Fi:-;; 1 '? "-" TR 1_ 2. ,:l':, TR 12 ,, 0
Hi ri: iC:, i0 i0 1.0 : i2.0 12.0 i2.0 12.0
: i2.0 i3'2~ 0 12.0 121. C)
: 12 0 '~ '~ '" .......... 1'~.._' 0
ADJUSTPIENT FA C-F tliR S
GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF- F'EDS F'ED. 'BUT, ARi-':,;, TYPE
( % ) ( '.';', ) Y .," N N m N b Y/' N rt., i n T
EB O. O0 2 ,, ,:iii('_') i',.t 0 0 ). 99 150 I',! 23,0 3
W B (') ........., (") n '2. (")o N o ,...;,.. ;-).._ o., ~.. ~.._'~ *') i" .i ;_.....'~:' '*:. n... :3
NB C). O0 2.0,:';) N ,.'1:, 0 0.99 ~:...;,:l:, i"..i 23. '} 3
SB ':). O0 21 ,, OC:, N 0 0 O. 99 50 N 23.0 3
SIGNAL SET'TiNGS CYCLE LENGTH =
F' Fi - i F' H .- 2 F' H- :~1 P H- 4 P H- ] F'i-.!-- 2 F' H- 3
E B L T X ,;' -,: .,-, =' L T X
T H x T H X
R 7 x RT X
X X
X
X X
X X
,,.-, (-) .%, ~
.~. L.~ .,::.. 0
i '20. ,")
PH.,-4
0.0
0.0
LEVEL (DF:
LANE GRP, V/C G/C DELAY LOS AF'P. DELAY'
EB L 1. (":,47. . (} . 167 9!:5. ~, ~ F 42 , '..5
-FR 0_. 765 O. 367 ~_,~'. 4 D
WB L 0. i"71 0. 16'7 45. I E 5(") ,, 7
TR I. 013 O. :367 51 · 6 E
NB L (").. 988 -':')_. l '":"=',:... ~, 8,J. i '-, ,'", i . "',"
"i-R O. 968 O. 208 :-5:-5, 1 E
SB L ':-:'. 989 O. 192 73.4 F 47,6
TR ;"). RT~_. . 0.27t'"-,-._,,_.,"-re, 3 D
AF'F'.
LOS
E
E
F
E
I N T E R S E C'T' i r] i'q: D e 1 a ",; = .49. c.:, ¢' s e c / v e I-.-~ ', '.J ,,' r-': = i, ,:",' i ') 4 r'" c- = E
:i: )}lENT :[ F:'Y :[ NG I NFORMA'!- Z QN
NAME ,_,,n~:' 'THE.. EA:=;T/WE:S.T STF-CEET......... C. Ai"iPBiEi_i_ AL,'E
Fh."::~h'iE GF THE ~..,,-,~, ,, ., '-. r, ,. -r ...............
· ~u ..Tm: 5,.-'.,._. ,~. STREET ........
A F.." E ~c~ "F Y P E ......................................... i--: ~ L".'
NAME OF: THE ¢~.r'."":~
~-" '~ '~- ~:'- !2) F ...................... '
.,_,m, ,: THIE AN~i_Y% I. E':,. 7/'
T l]"'!H PER ]: EiD ~:~NGL._YZED .................... ?-i
EITHER '£ i',!FGF-:ifiAT i ON:
E X I ~- ....
.::, ~ ]: HG
TF.:AF:F ]: C', k,,'.]l_ Jt;iES
I_EFT
EB WB NB SB
2 7 7 2 0 4 1 :'.? 6 3 0 i
THRU 807 1 (])99 438 697
R ;[ GHT 12,~ 1 .::,~ ~: ~ ,.., :[ (')9
RTOR 1 0 10 i 0 i 0
(RTOR volume mLt_S'P_ ~' -~ .
,_,e. less thap. ,--.r equal 'Lc) RIGHT turn Vt_]luff'les, )
NiJ P'iB E F-i: 0 F:' L A N E S i--~ E F;: D :i: R E C T ~ {'L'~ N T N C L _!!]~ l N G T U R i"..i B A Y S:
c.~--~ ~.,':~L...._m.!.u = :]; !4ESTBOL.iF. ii2, = 3 Ni]RT.-<SC",LJixi)'} =
~:'; C)!.j T i--4 B O U i'q T} = 3
E B W B Fq ;_=.: S B
LANt!:' TYPE W ? DTH TYPE W :r. DTH TYFZiE ':,.4 i DTH TYPE W ]: ','}"Fi-*.".
:L i._ :i. 2 ~, 0 l_ i :7..' = 0 i._ '± 2 ~ C:, i_ ;'L :'2 ~ O
3 TR :L 2 ~ 0 TR i '-'-* ;'"' TR J. 2, ':]:' "FR 1:2 ~ 0
4
L - EXCLLJSiVE LEFT LANE
L.T - i_EFT/THROUGH LANE
LR - LEFT/R.T. GH'T' ONLY LANE
LTF.: "- I_EFT/'T'!-.,'Rt3UGH/'RZGHT L~ ......
T - E':,:CLi iSiVE THROUGH LANE
TR - THRGLiGH/R '~GHT LANE
R. - E X C t.. LiS i V ES F: i i'3 H T L A N E
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
GRADE HEAVY VEH "" P~ ' "~'~*'="'~ ........
· . ~,J,- ...... ~ PKG Ldtj'.:_4Ei:;
(%) (%) Y/N (Nm) (Nb) F'HF
EASTBOUND 0.0(')_ ~.'~ 00 N .... (]) 6 c), ~9
W E S T B 0 U N D 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.99
NORTHBOUND O.00. ~.° 00. N C). ,'-)._ C,_. 99
SOU-FHBOUND 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 O, 99
Nm = number 04: parking maneu,,'er=-./hr; Nb = number nY buses s'Lc:,pping/hr
CONFLICTING F'EDS F'EDESTRiAN BUTTOi'q
(peds/hour) (Y/N) (r'n~.n T) ARRIVAL TYF'E
EASTBOUND ~" .......
.-_,u N z.:,. 0 3
W E S T B (3 U N D '.'"] (") N 7' 3, ,:) 3
N 0 R T H B 0 U N D 5 0 N "2-'.];. 0 3
S O I_j T Fi B (3 U N D '='" '" '? ':") 3
...: .... N ,,:..-.. _
rain T = mJ.r]imum gr"eer"i time ,~or pedestr"~.ar"~s
E A.'_:.i: T /'4~~ .... PHAS i NG
?HASE- i
EASTBOUND
LEFT X
-F H IR U X
iR I G H T X
F-'E.OS X
WESTBOUND
L. EFT X
THRU X
R I G I.-t'T' X
PEDS X
NC)IRTHBOUi'qD R'T
SOLiTHBCCJND RT
GREEN 20.0 44.0 O. ,:'_'.., 0.0
· .'c' ' i-i '~ .... 2. 0 .... '"'_ ']'
f~_L_LL.b, -i- ALL p.:E~ 2, -':-> A. c:, ~.,..,.~
N[]RTH/SOUTH PHASING
NORTHBOUi'..!D
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
PEDS
.PHASE-
X
SOUTHBOUND
LEFT
THRU
RIGHT
PEDS
X
EAE;TBOUND RT
WESTBOUND R'T
PHASE-2 PHASE-3 PHASE-4
X
X X
X X
X X
X
G R E EI",.I 1 = ,:] 6.0 "-'= '"" .......
YELL. OW + ALL RED 2.0 2.0 ? *'"~
EB
m,,'; ~, ..'=~ '_._.'d .... --.,. .... - .....UT !,' k. ~ {_.'.,Ril)W'FH ,:x-.:r'. rtF-..::.,._.t?
V 0 L .... P H F:' V O I._, G F-..' P, V 0 L... L i"..i F' A C T, i::- A C T. V ifil._, L T R T
{ .... 7 , ,. " '-' =' '-' :L ,, ,:":,00
"F H ~_ ~_.,; 0, '= ~:'- 8 i. 5 -F R 9 :! 2 2 .~., ,..,' ~_, ~_~ 9'79 0 ,, 00 0, :I. 3
R T i 26 O. '= c:, i"
WB
NB
LT i 96 0.99
T H 438 0.99
R: T 2 1 5 0 o o.
1 '-.98 L 198 1 1. 000 i. 000 198 i. O0 0. ,:}('>
442 TR 650 2 I. 050
207
SB
L T ."301 0.99
T H 697 0.99
R T i C, 9 C,. 99
304 L 304 1 i. 0::}0 1. 000 304 1 . O0 O. O0
704 TR 804 " t 0:50 ]. 000 ~44 ....... 2 O, 117
l '.l) 0
Denotes a De+ ac:to [_.e4:'i- TurF'., Lane
EB
i. QC, C:, '-'-:'. q~,:-:, i. 000 i. 000 :i.. 000 (':,. 90':'_",' i ,, 0()0 .i.. 000 1. 604
I.C, 00 0.99-':';:, ~.C, O0 ;i..O00 :i_.::?,00 0,,900 0,,9'79 I,,000 .34~0
,:~:-.'-:,,:":, ........ .,.'3.9~,:":, .,..* Q¢.'-:":-' .... '~. ,'-',Q;-;........ .i.. OOC, ,:}. 900 I . :S, OC, i . 000 I "_,5(]>,:$
000 ('-).990 i,,000 i.,:}(),::~ i.C, 00 0.900 C:,.98:3 ~.000 3503
NB
L
'TR
1800
2000
000 0.99,:} 1.0C, 0 1.000 i.000 0. 900 1.000 1.Q,:bO i604
000 0.990 I.OC',:} i.00,:} i. OC:'-':';~ 0,,900 0..9.~t9 i.0'00 3384
SB
T
1 8 0 0
L-)Q() ,:]). 99::} i ,, ()::'}0 ]., Q-':}Q I , 0::},:} ,:}. 90Q ]., 0()() ]., C, OQ 16(.')4
000 0.990 1.00(') ?,.~OQO I~'0'00 .':}.900 0.980 1.000 3493
b
TR
(q:) ,.." C: ) { r.. ) R ~'t" Z,..,n
(), ;.67 267 '!.047 ~:
0 ,, 7;67' i 2:30 O, 765
W B
L
TR
NB
L.
T IR
L 3C:,4 16C:,4 0., 190
.....~ m 8_ '-~. ,$. 3 .'% 93 0,242
Cvc].e Leng'th., C = I'-"'"" 0 sec:
Los.'L Time Per P.',;r-l.e, i_ = 8.0 sec
Eutm ~.v/s¢ criti,'"a~ = 0,,937
X cr"iticai = 1.(}0'%
EB
L
"FIR
L
T R
0.771 0. ~ 6 '7 12,.'} ,, 0 :3,:.+.,. 3 26 ,,? ~'2,. '7 i. C,'O 4- 5. ~ E 50.7 E
:[. 0 i 3 O. :3,.-'-'_.'.7 i 2('. 0 29. :[ i 2S.4 :22 ,, 5 i. O0 5 1. ,.-'5 E
NB
L
TR
B
L.
~R
989 ,:}. 192 120.0 36.8 307 36.6 i. OQ 77;..¥ F 4'7,,6 E
!E: 7'..9 -0.2 '7:5 :[ .'2,::;). 0 31.. 6 961 6 ,, 7 i. 00 3 S. 3 D
Int'erser+-ior, Delay = 49.9 ,::sec/,¢eh) lnterseci':ioc., LOS = E
...... ~ ":' ,-' ' '1 ~
TH ECl ]. i 11 ,_ff': 4-42 70,e.- ..".. T '." 2. 0 T 12 ~ o T i 2.0 T i 2.0
~;'.. T ;L 26 142 2 L 7 1 .,'~ .... ]. ~ TR ~. '-'~. = ,:").. TR .i. 2 .~ 0 ~ ~-.: L :2.0 TR .......i '7. ~ (")
R R 10 ]. 0 i 0 i 0 ~ 11 ,, 0 i 2.0 '12.0 12. ':'.':,
: L 2.0 ;'.' 2. C:' 1 ::it. 0 12 ,, 0
: .i. 2.0 'i :2.0 i 2.0 12.0
AD,] USTMENT
GRADE i4~J AOJ F"?'-([SBLISS% FHF PEDS F'ED. BUT. AR;R. TYPE
(%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y./N m~.n T
~: R 0. ci("i 2. (') (') N (-i ('~ ,', = ~ '.=],-) i'q "'~ ''~ C, 3
W B 0.00 2.00 N C' 0 O. ~' ~' 50 i"..J ~ 3.0 3
NB 0 ,, O0 2 ,, O0 N 0 0 C,. 99 50 N ~:];= 0
SB O. OC:, 2. OC} N 0 0 O. 9~ 50 N 23.0
S i FiNAl .... SET-F )_' ,;'""": ='-,,__, ~, CYCLE LENGTH
PH- I F'H-2 F'H-3 PH-4 PH- i F'H-2 PH-3
FP; LT X ~':~:' LT X
"i' H X 'F i4 X
R T X ' R T X
F'D X F'D X
NE', LT X SB LT X X
TH X TH X X
RT X RT X X
PD X F'D X X
GREEN 21.0 43.0 O. 0 O. 0 GREEN 15. ,:Z) 6. (} 25.
,. · i;L~ ~-~ .-)
~ ,_.L. LL~W 2 ('~ 2. '.") ('~. ("~ (-~. (] Y'ELLOi~.f 2 C~ =. 0
i 20.0
F't'+--4
LEVEL OF SERVICE
LANE GRF'. V/C G/C DELAY ! ~nR AF'P. DELAY
EB L 1.01:t O, .t75 82,2 F 40,'7
TR O. 794 O. 35R 28. S D
WB L 0.749 O. 175 42.9 E 62.9
TR 1. 057 O. 558 66. 1 F
.. '~ ~2 '7 Iz 65= 1
N B L I. 0 t 3 n 1 ~ ....
TR O. 977 O. 208 56.9 E
SB L O. 989 O. 192 73.4 F 48.2
T Fi: 0.89 ~ O. 2'75 39.3 D
AF'F:'.
LOS
E
F
F
INTERSECTION: Del av = 54.0 (sec/..-'en;, V/C = i.0i6 LOS = E
APPENDIX B
Traffic Counts
source: Traffic Data Service, 1989
B-1
cD t.f'h
,~ 0
z
0
0
z
- ~
DIAGRAM:
.............. ISAN TOMAS
AQUINO
CAMPBELL
INTERSEC"I'ION STUDY
LOCAT]iON: ~3 CAMPBELL @ SAN TOMAS
AQIJiNO
DATE:5-23-89 RECORDER:
WEATHER:
REMARKS:
FILE NAME:RGM3AM
............ ==FROM N
BLANK ~. SB ON
LOCATION * 1 I 2
TIME * L ', S
07 00-0715- 27 ', 30
0715-0730. 33 I 43
0730-0745* 47 ~ 60
0745 -0800* 4I I 63
0800 -0815- 26 ~ 55
0815-0830- 25 I 50
0830 -0845* 21 : 47
0845 - c~9 A A. o c,
..... ~ 53
· 0 : 0
· 0 ~ 0
· 0 : 0
· 0 I 0
· 0 I 0 -I
TH
* TOT * NB ON
3 I ..... * 4 I 5
R I II * L I S
35 I 92 * 35 I .75
39 I 115 * 43 I 'BO
27 ~ 134 * 39 ~ 127
15 I 11'9 * 45 ~ 114
20 I 101 * 55 I 130
=FROM SOUTH ............................
* TOT * TOTAl_ * HOUR *
R
40
39
29
27
3~
51
39
40
0
0
0
0
0
..... * ALL * VOLUME *
,' ', ********* ENDING *
150
172
1'95
186
218
· 52'..2'52
198
160
0
0
0
0
0
602 * AT *
659 * II *
728 **********
778 * 2767 *
778 * 2943 *
785 * 3069 *
733 * 3074 *
666 * 2962 *
0 * 2184 *
0 * 139'9 *
0 * 666 *
0 * 0 *
0 * 0 *
TOTAL *242 * 401 -1'96 * 83'9 *339 -* 864 *298 -1501 *
572'9 **********
PEAK TO'[ -113 * 215 * 75 * 403 -195 * 47'9 -150 * 824 ******************
...... =FROM EAST= =FROM WEST =MAX IS: 3074
BLANK * WB ON * TOT * EB ON -* TOT *THE PEAK HOUR IS:
LOCATION * 7 ~ 8 ~ 9 ~ .... * 10 ~ 11 ~ 12 ~ .... *BETWEEN 745
TIME * L I S I R I II * L I S I R I I I *
0700 -0715- 15 I 201 I 14 I 230 * 11 I 105 I 14 I 130 *AND 845
0715-0730- 9 : 215 ~ 20 ~ 244 * 7 : 111 : 10 : 128 *
0730-0745* 12 ~ 221 ~ 21 ~ 254 * 15 : 121 ~ 9 ~ 145 *
0745-0800* 19 : 250 ~ 29 ~ 298 * 10 ~ 155 ~ 10 I 175 *
0800-0815- 30 ~ 231 : 27 : 288 * 20 : 130 : 21 : 171 *
0815-0830. 33 : 240 : 23 : 296 * 23 ~ 139 : 11 ~ 173 *
0830 -0845* 29 : 200 : 14 : 243 * 19 : 157 : 27 : 203 *
0845-0900* 30 ~ 211 ~ 11 ~ 252 * 21 ~ 119 : 19 ~ 159 *
· 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 * 0 I 0 I 0 ', 0 *
· 0 ', 0 ', 0 I 0 * 0 ', 0 ', 0 ', 0 *
· 0 I 0 I 0 ', 0 * 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 *
· 0 I 0 ~ 0 I 0 * 0 I 0 I 0 I 0-*
· 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 * 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 *
TOTAL -177 -176'9 * ~"- . .
1~ .2105 -126 *1¢~3] -121 -1284 *
PEAK TOT *ili * 921 * 93 -1125 * 72 * 581 * 6'9 * 722 *
DIAGRAM:
SAN TOMAS
AQUINO
CAMPBELL
INTERSECTION STUDY
LOCAT:ON: ~3 CAMPBELL @ SAN TOMAS,
AQUINO
DATE:5-17-89 RECORDER:
WEATHER:
REMARKS:
FILE NAME: RGM3PM
==== .... ====FROM N TH
BLANK . ,~E _,.~
,-. ( F'I,',~
LOCATION * 1 I 2 : 3
TIME *- L I S ', R
IE. 00-1615. 45 I 95 ',
=' "-'~¢'* =~ 32
161~-1~.o.~ . I 127
163(')-1645. 71 ~ 145 ~ 2'9
1645-17(:)('). 79 I 180 I 25
17(--)(:)-1715. 82 I 1'97 ~ 27
1715-1730. 69 I 175 I 28
1730-1745. 56,) I 155 ~ 36])
I745-180¢). 57 I 157 ~ 26
· 0 ', 0 I 0
· 0 I 0 ~ 0
. o ', 0 ', 0
· 0 ', 0 ', 0
· 0 I 0 'I 0
:= ....... '=:FROM SOUTH .............................
* T 0 T
17(:) *
212 * 35
245 * 3'9
284 * 52
] - 49
272 * 56
235 * 61
240 * 43
0 * 0
0 *
0 * 0
0 * 0
(:) * 0
NB ON
5 I
S I
90 ~, 37 I 160 *
86 I 44 I 165 *
9'9 I 45 I 183 *
114 I 53 I 219 *
12(,) I 66,) ', ';";'9 *
105 I 57 : 218 *
90 ~ 43 ', 194 *
91 i 4(,) i 174 *
0 I 0 I 0 *
0 ', 0 I 0 *
0 : 0 ', 0 *
0 ', 0 ', 0 *
TOT * TOTAL * HOUR *
· ALL * ,20L_IME *
', I ********* ENDING *
876 -~ AT '*
971 * II *
1105 **********
1208 * 4160 *
1204 * 4488 *
1090 * 4607 *
98'9 * 4491 *
929 * 4212 *
0 * 3008 *
0 * 1'918 *
0 * 929 *
0 * 0 *
0 * 0 *
TOTAL *506 -1231 *227 -1964 * 368 * 7'95 * o. :~ -1542 *
PEAK TOT *~-
c, U1 * 6'97 -109 -1107 * 1'96 * 438 * 1215 * 849 ******************
...... - ...... FROM EAST ............... FROM WEST
BLANK: . WB ON * TOT *
LOCATION * '7 I 8 : 'B I .... *
TIME * L I S I R I II *
1600-1615. 50 I 143 I 22 ~ 215 *
1615-1630. 56 I 156 I 24 I 236 *
1630-1645. 63 : 201 : 31 ~ 295 *
1645-1700. 60 ~ 215 ~ 30 ~ 305 *
1700-1715. 79 : 221 : 36 : 336 *
1715-1730. 75 ~ 170 : 29 : 274 *
1730-1745. 53 : 16'9 : 31 : 253 *
1745-1800. 50 I 163 ~ 27 I 240 *
EB ON
10 I 11 I
3.~ I 255
37 I 281
56 ', 290
61 ', 2'96
5(_') ', 253
37 I 26,:::,
· .:, - I 24'3
2'3 : 225
0 : 0
0 ', 0 ',
C) I 0 ',
0 ', 0
0 I 0 ',
=MAX IS: 4607
* TOT *THE PEAK HOUR IS:
12 I .... *BETWEEN 163(i)
R I ~ *
41 I ~1 *AND 173A
40 I 358 *
36 ', 382 *
43 ', 400 *
30 I ~'"~
29 : 326 *
25 ~ 307 *
21 : 275 *
0 '. 0 *
0 ', 0 *
0 ~ 0 *
0 I 0 *
0 I 0 *
PEAk:: TOT *277 * 807 -126 -1210 * 204 -1099 * 138 -1441 *
TOTAL *486 -1438 *230 -2154 * 338 -210'9 * 265 -2712 *
lI-