Use Permit - Res Add - 2002 CITY or CAMPBELL
Community Development Department
CAMPBELL
October 29, 2002
Todd and Tanya Lonac
81 N. First Street
Campbell, CA 95008
Subject: Building Plan Check Comments for BLD 2002-1203
81 N. First Street
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Lonac,
The Planning Division has reviewed your Building Permit application for the addition to your
residence at 81 N. First Street. This project was approved by the Planning Commission on September
24, 2002. Staff has reviewed the building permit plans with respect to the Conditional Use Permit
approved by the Planning Commission. The building permit plans must comply with the Conditions
of Approval of the Conditional Use Permit. The following Conditions of Approval of the Conditional
Use Permit for this project have not been met:
1. Building Elevations, Details and Colors: The applicant shall submit detailed building
elevations and exhibits depicting architectural details. Detailed elevations and exhibits shall
be reviewed by and approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance
of building permits. Project details include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. Details of materials to be used on the addition to the historic structure. Materials are to be
consistent with materials used on historic buildings of the same type, age, and style and shall
be of historic quality or appear to be historic quality.
b. Providing a color/material sample board specifying color palette, textures and materials to
ensure that it matches the existing roof material.
c. Providing roof samples or brochures of the color and material of the proposed roofing to
ensure that it matches the existing roof material.
d. Providing window schedules for high quality of window treatments and styles reflecting the
high quality historic windows depicted on the elevations. All windows shall be consistent
with the architectural style of the existing structure.
2. Parking and Driveways: All parking and driveway areas shall be developed in compliance with
the approved plans and Chapter 21.50 (Parking and Loading) of the Campbell Municipal Code.
All parking spaces and driveways shall be graded, drained and surfaced with an asphaltic or
70 North First Street · Campbell, California 95OO8-1436 - TEL 408.866.2140 - V^X 408.87 1.5 140 . TDD 408.866.2790
Building Plan Check Cot,..entsfor BLD 2002-1203
October 29, 2002
8] N. First Street
Page 2 of 2
concrete surface to provide a durable and dust-free surface and access under all weather
conditions.
Please indicate this on the plans.
3. Contractor Contact Information Posting: The project site shall be posted with the name and
contact number of the lead contractor in a location visible from the public street prior to the
issuance of building permits.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at (408) 866-2193 if you have any questions about these
comments.
Sincerely,
Darcy Smith
Planner II
Cc~
Geoff Bradley, Senior Planner
Frank Mills, Senior Building Inspector
Bruno Marcelic, Architect, 365 E. Campbell Avenue, Campbell, CA 95008
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME E1 04 3 8
CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION
De Minimis Impact Finding
Project Title/Location (include county):
PLN2002-86
81 N. First Street
Campbell, CA 95008
Santa Clara County
Project Description:
Conditional Use Permit to allow a 776-square foot addition to a single-family residence that is a
Historic Landmark (the Mrs. Bull house)
Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary):
The Planning Commission adopted the Negative Declaration based upon the findings in the initial
study prepared for this project which determined hat no effects to wildlife or the environment will
result from development of this project.
Certification:
I hereby certify that the public agency has made the above finding and that the project will not individually
or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and
Game Code.
Signature:
Title:
City of Campbell
Date:
%?C H A~-0
CITY OF CAMPBELL
Community Development Department
CAMPBELL
September 26, 2002
Todd and Tanya Lonac
81 N. First Street
Campbell, CA 95008
Re:
PLN2002-86 - 81 N. First Street
Conditional Use Permit - Residential Addition to Historic Landmark
Dear Applicants:
Please be advised that at its meeting of September 24, 2002, the Planning Commission adopted
Resolution No. 3456 granting a Conditional Use Permit (PLN2002-86) to allow a 776 square
foot addition to a single-family residence that is a designated historic landmark on the above-
referenced property.
This action is effective in ten calendar days, unless appealed in writing to the City Clerk by 5
p.m. on Friday, October 4, 2002. California Code of Civil Procedure, Section 1094.6, governs
the time within which judicial review of this decision must be sought.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (408) 866-2140.
Sincerely,
Darcy Smith
Planner II
CC:
Frank Mills, Building Department
Lynn Penoyer, Public Works
Chris Veargason, County Fire
70 North First Street · Campbell, California 95008-1436 · TEL 408.866.2140 · FAX 408.871.5140 · TDD 408.866.2790
RESOLUTION NO. 3456
BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF CAMPBEI.I. APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT (PLN2002-86) TO ALLOW A 776 SQUARE FOOT
ADDrrION TO A SINGI.E-FAMILY RESIDENCE THAT IS A
DESIGNATED HISTORIC LANDMARK (THE MRS. BULL
HOUSE) ON PROPERTY OWNED BY TODD AND TANYA
LOCAC AT 81 N. FIRST STREET IN A P-D-H (PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT-HISTORIC) ZONING DISTRICT. APPLICATION
OF TODD AND TANYA LONAC. FII.E NO. PLN2002-86.
After notification and public hearing, as specified by law, and after presentation by the
Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed.
After due consideration of all evidence presented, the Planning Commission did find as follows
with respect to application PLN2002-86:
1. The development of the proposed project will result in a use that is consistent with the
General Plan land use of Low-Medium Density Residential and/or Professional Office for
this area.
2. The proposed project is well designed and is architecturally compatible with the surrounding
neighborhood.
The proposed project consists of a 661 square foot addition to the back of the residence,
creating a master bedroom and bathroom and a breakfast/family room off the kitchen. The
kitchen will be remodeled and interior stairs to the unfinished basement will be added. The
project also includes remodeling the storage portion of the existing detached secondary
dwelling unit and adding on 115 square feet in order to create a single car garage.
The site plan illustrates the location of the addition at the rear of the house, reducing its
visibility from the street. The new garage will be visible from the street but will be designed
to be consistent with the main house and include a carriage style wood door.
The proposed addition is consistent with the architectural design and historic character of the
structure. The addition has been designed to be compatible with the existing structure. The
new wood siding, windows, window trim, and roof will match the main residence.
6. The proposed project is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Structures.
An Initial Study has been prepared for this project, which provides documentation for the
factual basis for concluding that a Negative Declaration may be prepared since no substantial
evidence exists, in light of the whole record, that the project may have a significant effect on
the environment.
Planning Commission Res( '.on No. 3456
PLN2002-86 - 81 N. First Street
Use Permit-Addition to Historic Landmark Residence (Mrs. Bull House)
Page 2
o
A Negative Declaration that describes the reasons that the project will not have a significant
effect on the environment and therefore does not require the preparation of an Environmental
Impact Report was prepared pursuant to Section 15071 of the California Environmental
Quality Act Guidelines.
9. The City of Campbell provided a notice of intent to adopt a Negative Declaration to the
public via the Campbell Express and the County Clerk.
10. The City of Campbell provided a 20-day public review period of the Negative Declaration
pursuant to Section 15073 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
11. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the Negative Declaration reflects
the independent judgment of the Planning Commission.
Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further finds and concludes
that:
1. The proposed development and uses clearly will result in a more desirable environment and
use of the land than would be possible under any other zoning classification.
2. The development and uses will be compatible with the General Plan of the City and will aid
in the harmonious development of the immediate area.
o
The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort or
general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, or
be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the
general welfare of the city.
4. The proposed site is adequately served by streets of sufficient capacity to carry the kind and
quantity of traffic such use would generate.
5. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the Conditions of
Approval and the impacts of the project.
6. No substantial evidence has been presented which shows that the project as currently
presented would have a significant effect on the environment.
7. The Custodian of the Record for this Negative Declaration and Initial Study is the City Clerk
of the City of Campbell, located at 70 North First Street, Campbell, California.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission approves a Conditional
Use Permit (PLN2002-86) to allow a 776 square foot addition to a single-family residence that is
Planning Commission Resc' 'on No. 3456
PLN2002-86 - 81 N. First Street
Use Permit-Addition to Historic Landmark Residence (Mrs. Bull House)
Page 3
a designated Historic Landmark (the Mrs. Bull House) on property owned by Todd and Tanya
Lonac at 81 N. First Street, subject to the following conditions:
Where approval by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, Public Works
Director, City Attorney or Fire Department is required, that review shall be for compliance with
all applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines, ordinances, laws and
regulations and accepted engineering practices for the item under review. Additionally, the
applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or
Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this development
and are not herein specified.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Planning Division:
Project Approval: Approval is granted for a Conditional Use Permit (PLN2002-89) allowing
a 661 square foot addition to the back of the residence, creating a master bedroom and
bathroom and a breakfast/family room off the kitchen. The project also includes remodeling
the storage portion of the existing detached secondary dwelling unit and adding on 115
square feet in order to create a single car garage. The building and site design shall
substantially conform to the set of plans submitted by Bruno Marcelic, Architect, and dated
July 1, 2002, including building elevations and site plan, except as may be modified by the
Conditions of Approval herein.
Conditional Use Permit Approval: The Conditional Use Permit approval shall be valid for a
period of one year from the date of final approval. Within this one-year period, a building
permit must be obtained and construction completed one year thereafter or the Conditional
Use Permit shall be void.
ge
Building Elevations, Details and Colors: The applicant shall submit detailed building
elevations and exhibits depicting architectural details. Detailed elevations and exhibits shall
be reviewed by and approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance
of building permits. Project details include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. Details of materials to be used on the addition to the historic structure. Materials are to
be consistent with materials used on historic buildings of the same type, age, and style
and shall be of historic quality or appear to be historic quality.
b. Providing a color/material sample board specifying color palette, textures and materials
to ensure that it matches the existing roof material.
c. Providing roof samples or brochures of the color and material of the proposed roofing to
ensure that it matches the existing roof material.
Planning Commission Resc on No. 3456
PLN2002-86 - 81 N. First Street
Use Permit-Addition to Historic Landmark Residence (Mrs. Bull House)
Page 4
d. Providing window schedules for high quality of window treatments and styles reflecting
the high quality historic windows depicted on the elevations. All windows shall be
consistent with the architectural style of the existing structure.
4. Parking and Driveways: All parking and driveway areas shall be developed in compliance
with the approved plans and Chapter 21.50 (Parking and Loading) of the Campbell
Municipal Code. All parking spaces and driveways shall be graded, drained and surfaced
with an asphaltic or concrete surface to provide a durable and dust-free surface and access
under all weather conditions.
5. Construction Hours: Construction activities will be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00
p.m. weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Saturdays. Construction is prohibited on Sundays
and Holidays unless an exception is granted by the Building Official.
6. Contractor Contact Information Posting: The project site shall be posted with the name and
contact number of the lead contractor in a location visible from the public street prior to the
issuance of building permits.
Building Division:
7. Permits Required: A separate building permit application shall be required for each addition
proposed to the existing structures. The building permit shall include
Electrical/Plumbing/Mechanical fees when such work is part of the permit.
8. Construction Plans: The Conditions of Approval shall be stated in full on the cover sheet of
construction plans submitted for building permit.
9. Size of Plans: The size of construction plans submitted for building permits shall be 24 in. x
36 in.
10. Plan Preparation: This project requires plans prepared under the direction and oversight of a
California licensed Engineer or Architect. Plans submitted for building permits shall be "wet
stamped" and signed by the qualifying professional person.
11. Site Plan: Application for building permit shall include a competent site plan that identifies
property and proposed structures with dimensions and elevations as appropriate. Site plan
shall also include site drainage details. Site address and parcel numbers shall also be clearly
called out.
12. Title 24 Energy Compliance: California Title 24 Energy Compliance forms CF-IR and MF-
IR shall be blue-lined on the construction plans. 8~ by 11 calculations shall be submitted as
well.
13. Special Inspections: When a special inspection is required by U.B.C. Section 1701, the
architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be submitted to
the Building Official for approval prior to issuance of the building permits, in accordance
with U.B.C Section 106.3.5. Please obtain City of Campbell, Special Inspection forms from
the Building Inspection Division Counter.
Planning Commission Reso' an No. 3456
PLN2002-86 - 81 N. First Street
Use Permit-Addition to Historic Landmark Residence (Mrs. Bull House)
Page 5
14. Water Pollution: The City of Campbell, standard Santa Clara Valley Non-point Source
Pollution Control Program specification sheet shall be part of plan submittal. The
specification sheet (size 24" X 36") is available at the Building Division service counter.
15. Approvals Required: The project requires the following agency approval prior to issuance of
the building permit:
a. West Valley Sanitation District (378-2407)
b. Santa Clara County Fire Department (378-4010)
c. School District:
i) Campbell Union School District (378-3405)
ii) Campbell Union High School District (371-0960)
iii) Moreland School District (379-1370)
iv) Cambrian School District (377-2103)
Note: To Determine your district, contact the offices identified above. Obtain the School
District payment form from the City Building Division, after the Division has approved
the building permit application.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 24th day of September, 2002, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Alderete, Francois, Gibbons, Hemandez, Jones and Rocha
None
Doorley
None
APPROVED:
Tom Francois, Chair
ATTEST:
Sharon Fierro, Secretary
ITEM NO. 1
CAMPBELL
PLN2002-86
Lonac, T & T.
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF
SEPTEMBER 24, 2002
Public Hearing to consider the application of Todd and Tanya Lonac for a
Conditional Use Permit (PLN2002-86) to allow a 776 square foot addition
to a single-family residence that is a Historic Landmark (the Mrs. Bull
House) on property owned by Todd and Tanya Lonac located at 81 N. First
Street in a P-D-H (Planned Development - Historic) Zoning District.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Commission takes the following action:
Adopt a Resolution, incorporating the attached findings, approving a Conditional Use Permit to
allow a 776 square foot addition to a single-family residence that is a Historic Landmark and
adopting a Negative Declaration, subject to the attached Conditions of Approval.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
In accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City conducted an Initial
Study for this project. The results of the study determined that no significant impacts would be
created as a result of this project. Based upon the information provided in the environmental
assessment, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the Negative Declaration
prepared for this project. The Initial Study and the Negative Declaration are included as an
attachment to this report.
PROJECT DATA
Gross Lot Area:
Net Lot Area:
8,975 sq. ft. (0.21 acres)
7,475 sq. ft. (0.17 acres)
Building Area:
Main Residence Existing:
Proposed Addition:
Total:
Secondary Unit/Garage
Secondary Unit/Garage:
Proposed Addition:
Total:
Total
1,223 sq. ft.
661 sq. ft.
1,884 sq. ft.
503 sq. ft.
115 sq. ft.
618 sq. ft.
2,502 sq. ft.
Lot Coverage 33.4%
Floor Area Ratio: 0.33
Density: 8.8 units per gross acre
Staff Report -- Planning Commission Meeting of September 24, 2002
PLN2002-86 -- 81 N. First Street
Page 2 of 3
Parking:
Required:
Provided:
4 spaces (2 covered, 2 uncovered)
4 spaces (1 covered, 3 uncovered)
DISCUSSION
Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit for an
addition to an existing single-family residence located at 81 N. First Street. The project site is
located on North First Street north of its intersection with Civic Center Drive. It is located
directly across from the City Hall.
The proposed project consists of a 661 square foot addition to the back of the residence, creating
a master bedroom and bathroom and a breakfast/family room off the kitchen. The kitchen will be
remodeled and interior stairs to the unfinished basement will be added. The project also includes
remodeling the storage portion of the existing detached secondary dwelling unit and adding on
115 square feet in order to create a single car garage. The existing secondary dwelling unit would
be reduced in size from 503 square feet to 344 square feet.
Background: The site is a 7,475 net square foot residential parcel that is developed with a
residence that was built in approximately 1900. A detached secondary dwelling unit that was
built at a later date is located in the rear yard area. The single-family residence was designated a
Historic Landmark in November 1993 after Mr. and Mrs. Lonac applied for this designation.
ANALYSIS
General Plan Designation: The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Low-
Medium Density Residential and/or Professional Office. The proposed project is consistent with
the land use designation.
Zoning Designation: The zoning designation for the project site is P-D-H (Planned Development
District with Historic Overlay). The proposed project is permitted with approval of a Conditional
Use Permit which must be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Board.
Site Plan: The site plan illustrates the location of the addition at the rear of the house, reducing its
visibility from the street. The new garage will be visible from the street but will be designed to be
consistent with the main house and include a carriage style wood door. The garage will provide
one covered parking space in order to meet the requirements of the Zoning Code.
Architecture: Staff has reviewed the proposed addition and finds that it is consistent with the
architectural design and historic character of the structure. The addition has been designed to be
compatible with the existing structure. The new wood siding, windows, window trim, and roof
will match the main residence.
The Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties:
The proposed project is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Structures. Per the Standards, the
addition does not destroy historic materials, features, and spatial relationships that characterize
the property. Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of
Staff Report -- Planning Commission Meeting of September 24, 2002
PLN2002-86 -- 81 N. First Street
Page 3 of 3
craftsmanship that characterize the property will be preserved. The new work is differentiated
from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and
proportion, and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment. The
Standards require the new addition to be undertaken in a such a manner that, if removed in the
future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment would be
unimpaired. These guidelines stipulate that additions should be designed and constructed to be
clearly differentiated from the historic building and so that the character-defining features are not
radically changed, obscured, damaged, or destroyed.
Parking: Currently there is no covered parking at the subject site. The proposed project would
include the conversion of part of the storage portion of the existing detached secondary dwelling
unit to a single car garage. Since there are two dwelling units on the property, two covered and
two uncovered parking spaces are required. This project provides four total parking spaces but
only one of the parking spaces is covered. Since the project only involves remodeling the main
structure and would reduce the size of the secondary unit to 344 square feet, staff finds that there
are special circumstances with this project that warrants an adjustment to the parking
requirement.
Historic Preservation Board: This application was referred to the Historic Preservation Board for
review and comment at their meeting of July 24, 2002. The Board determined that the addition is
consistent with the architectural design and character of the structure and passed a motion
recommending approval of the Conditional Use Permit to the Planning Commission.
Site and Architectural Review Committee: The Site and Architectural Review Committee
reviewed this application at its meeting of August 27, 2002, and expressed support of the
application as proposed.
Attachments:
1. Findings for Approval of File No. PLN2002-86
2. Conditions of Approval for File No. PLN2002-86
3. Exhibits (Site Plan, Floor Plans & Elevations)
4. Letter from Applicant
5. Photographs
6. Negative Declaration and Initial Study
7. Location Map
Prepared by: '~:1~{~. 5~]A
Darcy Smith, Planner II
Approved
by:
Ge/off I'/Bradley, Senior Planne[/
Attachment #1
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF FILE NO. PLN2002-86 (CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT)
SITE ADDRESS:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
81 N. First Street
Todd and Tanya Lonac
September 24, 2002
Findings for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow a 776 square foot addition to a single-
family residence that is a Historic Landmark and adoption of a Negative Declaration
The Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to File No. PLN2002-86:
The development of the proposed project will result in a use that is consistent with the
General Plan land use of Low-Medium Density Residential and/or Professional Office for
this area.
2. The proposed project is well designed and is architecturally compatible with the surrounding
neighborhood.
o
The proposed project consists of a 661 square foot addition to the back of the residence,
creating a master bedroom and bathroom and a breakfast/family room off the kitchen. The
kitchen will be remodeled and interior stairs to the unfinished basement will be added. The
project also includes remodeling the storage portion of the existing detached secondary
dwelling unit and adding on 115 square feet in order to create a single car garage.
o
The site plan illustrates the location of the addition at the rear of the house, reducing its
visibility from the street. The new garage will be visible from the street but will be designed
to be consistent with the main house and include a carriage style wood door.
o
The proposed addition is consistent with the architectural design and historic character of the
structure. The addition has been designed to be compatible with the existing structure. The
new wood siding, windows, window trim, and roof will match the main residence.
6. The proposed project is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for
Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Structures.
o
An Initial Study has been prepared for this project, which provides documentation for the
factual basis for concluding that a Negative Declaration may be prepared since no substantial
evidence exists, in light of the whole record, that the project may have a significant effect on
the environment.
o
A Negative Declaration that describes the reasons that the project will not have a significant
effect on the environment and therefore does not require the preparation of an Environmental
Impact Report was prepared pursuant to Section 15071 of the California Environmental
Quality Act Guidelines.
Findings for Approval --Planning Commission Meeting of September 24, 2002 Attachment #1
PLN2002-86 -- 81 N. First Street Page 2 of 2
9. The City of Campbell provided a notice of intent to adopt a Negative Declaration to the
public via the Campbell Express and the County Clerk.
10. The City of Campbell provided a 20-day public review period of the Negative Declaration
pursuant to Section 15073 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
11. The Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that the Negative Declaration reflects
the independent judgment of the Planning Commission.
Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further finds and concludes
that:
1. The proposed development and uses clearly will result in a more desirable environment and
use of the land than would be possible under any other zoning classification.
2. The development and uses will be compatible with the General Plan of the City and will aid
in the harmonious development of the immediate area.
o
The proposed use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort or
general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, or
be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the
general welfare of the city.
4. The proposed site is adequately served by streets of sufficient capacity to carry the kind and
quantity of traffic such use would generate.
5. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the Conditions of
Approval and the impacts of the project.
6. No substantial evidence has been presented which shows that the project as currently
presented would have a significant effect on the environment.
7. The Custodian of the Record for this Negative Declaration and Initial Study is the City Clerk
of the City of Campbell, located at 70 North First Street, Campbell, California.
Attachment//2
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR FILE NO. PLN2002-86 (CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT)
SITE ADDRESS:
APPLICANT:
DATE:
81 N. First Street
Todd and Tanya Lonac
September 24, 2002
The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that (s)he is required to meet the
following conditions in accordance with the ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of
California. The lead department with which the applicant will work is identified on each
condition where necessary. Where approval by the Director of Community Development, City
Engineer, Public Works Director, City Attorney, or Fire Department is required, that review shall
be for compliance with all applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines,
ordinances, laws and regulations, and accepted engineering practices, for the items under review.
Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that (s)he is required to comply with all applicable
Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this
development and are not herein specified:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Planning Division:
1. Project Approval: Approval is granted for a Conditional Use Permit (PLN2002-89) allowing
a 661 square foot addition to the back of the residence, creating a master bedroom and
bathroom and a breakfast/family room off the kitchen. The project also includes remodeling
the storage portion of the existing detached secondary dwelling unit and adding on 115
square feet in order to create a single car garage. The building and site design shall
substantially conform to the set of plans submitted by Bruno Marcelic, Architect, and dated
July 1, 2002, including building elevations and site plan, except as may be modified by the
Conditions of Approval herein.
2. Conditional Use Permit Approval: The Conditional Use Permit approval shall be valid for a
period of one year from the date of final approval. Within this one-year period, a building
permit must be obtained and construction completed one year thereafter or the Conditional
Use Permit shall be void.
3. Building Elevations, Details and Colors: The applicant shall submit detailed building
elevations and exhibits depicting architectural details. Detailed elevations and exhibits shall
be reviewed by and approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance
of building permits. Project details include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. Details of materials to be used on the addition to the historic structure. Materials
are to be consistent with materials used on historic buildings of the same type,
age, and style and shall be of historic quality or appear to be historic quality.
b. Providing a color/material sample board specifying color palette, textures and
materials to ensure that it matches the existing roof material.
c. Providing roof samples or brochures of the color and material of the proposed
roofing to ensure that it matches the existing roof material.
Conditions of Approval -- Planning Commission Meeting of Septemt~er 24, 2002 Attachment #2
PLN2002-86 -- 81 N. First Street Page 2 of 3
d. Providing window schedules for high quality of window treatments and styles
reflecting the high quality historic windows depicted on the elevations. All
windows shall be consistent with the architectural style of the existing structure.
4. Parking and Driveways: All parking and driveway areas shall be developed in compliance
with the approved plans and Chapter 21.50 (Parking and Loading) of the Campbell Municipal
Code. All parking spaces and driveways shall be graded, drained and surfaced with an
asphaltic or concrete surface to provide a durable and dust-free surface and access under all
weather conditions.
5. Construction Hours: Construction activities will be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00
p.m. weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Saturdays. Construction is prohibited on Sundays
and Holidays unless an exception is granted by the Building Official.
6. Contractor Contact Information Posting: The project site shall be posted with the name and
contact number of the lead contractor in a location visible from the public street prior to the
issuance of building permits.
Building Division:
7. Permits Required: A separate building permit application shall be required for each addition
proposed to the existing structures. The building permit shall include
Electrical/Plumbing/Mechanical fees when such work is part of the permit.
8. Construction Plans: The Conditions of Approval shall be stated in full on the cover sheet of
construction plans submitted for building permit.
9. Size of Plans: The size of construction plans submitted for building permits shall be 24 in. x
36 in.
10. Plan Preparation: This project requires plans prepared under the direction and oversight of a
California licensed Engineer or Architect. Plans submitted for building permits shall be "wet
stamped" and signed by the qualifying professional person.
11. Site Plan: Application for building permit shall include a competent site plan that identifies
property and proposed structures with dimensions and elevations as appropriate. Site plan
shall also include site drainage details. Site address and parcel numbers shall also be clearly
called out.
12. Title 24 Energy Compliance: California Title 24 Energy Compliance forms CF-1R and MF-
1R shall be blue-lined on the construction plans. 81/2 by 11 calculations shall be submitted as
well.
13. Special Inspections: When a special inspection is required by U.B.C. Section 1701, the
architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be submitted to
the Building Official for approval prior to issuance of the building permits, in accordance
with U.B.C Section 106.3.5. Please obtain City of Campbell, Special Inspection forms from
the Building Inspection Division Counter.
14. Water Pollution: The City of Campbell, standard Santa Clara Valley Non-point Source
Pollution Control Program specification sheet shall be part of plan submittal. The
specification sheet (size 24" X 36") is available at the Building Division service counter.
Conditions of Approval -- Planning Commission Meeting of Septemoer 24, 2002 Attachment #2
PLN2002-86 -- 81 N. First Street Page 3 of 3
15. Approvals Required: The project requires the following agency approval prior to issuance of
the building permit:
a. West Valley Sanitation District (378-2407)
b. Santa Clara County Fire Department (378-4010)
c. School District:
i) Campbell Union School District (378-3405)
ii) Campbell Union High School District (371-0960)
iii) Moreland School District (379-1370)
iv) Cambrian School District (377-2103)
Note: To Determine your district, contact the offices identified above. Obtain the School District
payment form from the City Building Division, after the Division has approved the building permit
application.
Attachment #4
Project summary for 81 N. 1st Street
We are planning an addition to our home at 81 N. 1 st Street to meet the needs
of our family of five. We currently have a two bedroom/one bath home that
is approximately 1200 square feet. Our proposed project consists of an
addition (660 square feet) to the back of our residence, creating a master
bedroom/bath and breakfast/family room off the kitchen. The kitchen will
also be remodeled to better utilize space and incorporate a period design.
There will be no change to the front elevation.
The project also includes replacing the shed portion of existing granny unit
with a single car garage with carnage style door.
We are sensitive to the historical and architectural value of our home to the
City of Campbell, which is why we applied for landmark designation in
1994. It is our intent to maintain the integrity of the structure with this
addition. We plan to use the appropriate building materials which are
consistent in design to the original home and the era in which it was built.
.E10g4 1--- E10341
ENDORSED
· . ,'BRENDA DAVIS, County Clerk-Recorder
,
NOTICE OF INTENT
INTENT TO ADO~ A NEGATI~ DECLA~TION -- ~"
CITY OF CA--BELL, CALIFO~IA
Notice is hereby given of the intent of the City of Campbell Planning Commission to
adopt a Negative Declaration for a Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street - Mrs. Bull
House - City of Campbell Historic Landmark.
The proposed project consists of a Conditional Use Permit (PLN2002-86) for a 776
square-foot addition to an existing single-family residence at 81 N. First Street. The
single-family residence, historically referred to as the Mrs. Bull House, was designated a
Historic Landmark in November 1993.
Based on the Initial Study, it has been concluded that the project described above will not
have a significant effect on the environment and a Negative Declaration has been
prepared.
The public review period for the Negative Declaration begins on Wednesday, August 7,
2002 and ends on Tuesday, August 27, 2002. Any comments must be submitted to the
Community Development Department by 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August 27, 2002. A
copy of the Initial Study and Negative Declaration are available for review from 8:00
a.m. to 5:00 p.m. at the Community Development Department, City Hall, 70 North First
Street, Campbell, California.
Notice is also hereby given that this project has been scheduled for a Planning
Commission public hearing at 7:30 p.m., or shortly thereafter, on September 10, 2002, in
the City Hall Council Chambers, 70 North First Street, Campbell, California.
Interested persons may attend this public hearing and comment upon the project or
provide written comments submitted before the public hearing date. Please be advised
that if you challenge the nature of this project in court, you may be limited to raising only
those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or
written correspondence delivered to the City of Campbell Community Development at, or
prior to the public hearing. Questions may be addressed to Darcy Smith, Planner II, at
(408) 866-2140.
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF CAMPBELL
SHARON FIERRO
SECRETARY
Pub. August 7, 2002
w/e/co-
IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERI{-RI~CORDIiR
BRENDA DAVI~, Ci~NTY CLERK
BY. L~ DEPUTY
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Project Title:
Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street - Mrs. Bull House - City of Campbell Historic
Landmark
Project Description:
The proposed project consists of a Conditional Use Permit (PLN2002-86) for a 776 square-foot
addition to an existing single-family residence at 81 N. First Street. The single-family residence,
historically referred to as the Mrs. Bull House, was designated a Historic Landmark in November
1993. The property is located in a P-D-H (Planned Development District with Historic Overlay)
district.
The proposed project consists of a 661 square foot addition to the back of the existing 1,223
square foot residence, creating a master bedroom and bathroom and a breakfast/family room off
the kitchen. The kitchen will be remodeled and interior stairs to the unfinished basement will be
added. The project also includes replacing the storage and closet portion of the existing detached
secondary dwelling unit with a 274 square foot single car garage. The existing secondary
dwelling unit would be reduced in size from 503 square feet to 344 square feet. The detached
structure would increase in size by only 115 square feet.
Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Campbell
Community Development Department
70 N. First St.
Campbell, CA 95008
Contact Person and Phone Number:
Darcy Smith, Planner 11
(408) 866-2140
Project Location:
The Project site is located on the west side of North First Street, just north of its intersection with
Civic Center Drive. The site is a 7,475 net square foot residential parcel that is developed with a
residence that was built in approximately 1900. A detached secondary dwelling unit that was
built at a later date is located in the rear yard area. The Project site is flat with landscaping
surrounding the residence.
E10541
Name and Address of Project Proponent:
Todd and Tanya Lonac (property owners
81 N. First Street, Campbell, CA, 95008
Campbell, CA 95008
Mitigation Measures:
None
Reviewing Agencies:
None
Public Review Period:
August 7 - 27, 2002
Public Hearings:
Planning Commission- September 10, 2002
Location of Initial Study and Related Documents:
City of Campbell
Community Development Department
70 N. First St.
Campbell, CA 95008
Findings and Basis for a Negative Declaration
The Planning Division has reviewed the Initial Study for the proposed Housing Element and,
based upon submittal evidence in the record, finds that:
3.
4.
5.
The project will not adversely affect water or air quality or increase noise levels
substantially;
The project will not have adverse impacts on the flora or fauna of the area;
The project will not degrade the aesthetic quality of the area;
The project will not have adverse impacts on traffic or land use;
In addition, the project will not:
a. Create impacts which have the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment,
b. Create impacts which achieve short-term to the disadvantage of long-term
environmental goals;
c. Create impacts for a project which are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable.
d. Create environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly.
The City of Campbell has therefore determined that the proposed project could not have a
significant effect on the environment.
E10 41
Protest of the draft Negative Declaration:
Any person may file a written protest of the draft Negative Declaration before 5:00 p.m. on
August 27, 2002. Such protest must be filed at the Community Development Department, City
Hall, 70 North First Street, Campbell, California. The written protest should make a "fair
argument" that the project will have one or more significant effects on the environment based on
substantial evidence.
August 2, 2002
DATE
SIGNATURE
Planner II
TITLE
City of Campbell
NAME OF LEAD AGENCY
Attachment: Initial Study for the Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street - Mrs. Bull House-
City of Campbell Historic Landmark
'Oi~cHA~0 *
INITIAL STUDY
Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street
Mrs. Bull House- City of Campbell Historic Landmark
CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
August 2, 2002
Prepared By:
Darcy Smith, Planner 11
Community Development Department
City of Campbell
70 North First Street
Campbell CA, 95008
(408) 866-2140
This study is prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street
Prepared on August 2, 2002
Page 2
I. BACKGROUND
Project Title:
Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street - Mrs. Bull House - City of Campbell Historic
Landmark
Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Campbell Community Development Department
70 North First Street
Campbell, CA 95008
Contact Person and Phone Number:
Darcy Smith, Planner II, (408) 866-2140
darcys @ cityofcampbell.com
Project Location:
81 N. First Street
Campbell, CA, 95008
Assessor Parcel Numbers 279-41-033
(See Figures 1 and 2)
Name and Address of Project Proponent:
Todd and Tanya Lonac (property owners
81 N. First Street, Campbell, CA, 95008
Campbell, CA 95008
General Plan Designation:
Low- Medium Density Residential/Office
Project Zoning:
P-D-H (Planned Development, Historic Preservation Overlay District)
Project Description:
The proposed project consists of a Conditional Use Permit (PLN2002-86) for a 776 square-foot
addition to an existing single-family residence at 81 N. First Street. The single-family residence,
historically referred to as the Mrs. Bull House, was designated a Historic Landmark in November
1993. The property is located in a P-D-H (Planned Development District with Historic Overlay)
zoning district.
The proposed project consists of a 661 square foot addition to the back of the existing 1,223
square foot residence, creating a master bedroom and bathroom and a breakfast/family room off
the kitchen. The kitchen will be remodeled and interior stairs to the unfinished basement will be
added. The project also includes replacing the storage and closet portion of the existing detached
secondary dwelling unit with a 274 square foot single car garage. The existing secondary
dwelling unit would be reduced in size from 503 square feet to 344 square feet. The detached
structure would increase in size by only 115 square feet.
E10341
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street
Prepared on August 2, 2002
Page 3
Project Location and Setting:
The Project site is located on the west side of North First Street, just north of its intersection with
Civic Center Drive. The site is a 7,475 net square foot residential parcel that is developed with a
residence that was built in approximately 1900. A detached secondary dwelling unit that was
built at a later date is located in the rear yard area. The Project site is flat with landscaping
surrounding the residence.
Land uses surrounding the Project site include the Campbell Civic Center and Library to the east
across North First Street, a duplex to the south, and single-family residences to the west and
north.
Figure 1: Regional Location
E 0341
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street
Prepared on August 2, 2002
Page 5
II. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the
checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetics
Materials
Biological Resources
Hazards and Hazardous 'l ......
Mineral Resources
Public Services
Agriculture Resources Air Quality
Cultural Resources Geology/Soils
Hydrology / Water Land Use / Planning
..~_uality
Noise Population / Housing
Recreation
Transportation/Traffic
Utilities / Service ! Mandatory Findings of Significance
_S.y_s_te__m_.s_ ............. i .......................................................................................................
III. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EVALUATION
Introduction: The following evaluation has been prepared to determine if the project may have a
significant impact on the environment. For the purposes of this study, a significant impact shall
mean a substantial or potentially substantial change in the physical environment.
Evaluations: A "No Impact" rating indicates that based upon the available information, it has
been determined that there will be no impact on the environment. A "Less Than Significant
Impact" rating indicates that the impact will be insignificant. A "Less Than Significant with
Mitigation Incorporation" rating indicates that a specific change to the project (mitigation
measures) could reduce the impact to a level of insignificance. A "Potentially Significant
Impact" rating indicates that the impact may or will be significant.
Discussion: A description of the factual data or evidence used to reach conclusions regarding
impact significance follows each section. The impacts of the project are summarized Section IV:
Determination and Recommendation.
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street
Prepared on August 2, 2002
E10341
Page 6
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporati
on
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
I. AESTHETICS -- Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a
scenic vista?
b) Substantially damage scenic
resources, including, but not limited to,
trees, rock outcroppings, and historic
buildings within a State scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing
visual character or quality of the site and
its surroundings?
X
X
d) Create a new source of substantial
light or glare that would adversely affect X
day or nighttime views in the area?
.............................................................................. ~ ............................... ~ ....................... ! ............... ~ ....................
Discussion:
No scenic vistas, resources or views open to the public will be impacted by the development of
this project. The project has been designed to be architecturally compatible with the surrounding
residential and institutional uses and will not degrade the existing visual character or quality of
the site and its surroundings. Because there will be additional building floor space, there will be
additional glare created, but it is not expected to be substantial nor would it adversely affect day
or nighttime views in the area.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporati
on
Less Than
Significant
Impact
~ II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES -- Would the project:
No
Impact
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique
Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide
Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
[...~a_p_s_prepared pursuant to the Farmland
X
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street
Prepared on August 2, 2002
E10341
Page 7
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporati
on
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
X
X
California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for
agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract?
c) Involve other changes in the existing
environment which, due to their location
or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
Discussion:
(a to c): The Project would be an urban development and would not convert prime farmland to
urban uses. Neither the Project site nor the surrounding areas are zoned for agricultural use and
are therefore not protected by Williamson Act contracts. The proposed urban development will
not result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural uses.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporati
on
1
Less Than I No
Significant] Impact
Impact
1II. AIR QUALITY -- Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct
implementation of the applicable air
quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or
contribute substantially to an existing or
projected air quality violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable
net increase of any criteria pollutant for
w_h_.ic~_t_.h?_p_~j, ect region is non-
X
X
X
E10841
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street
2
attainment under an applicable federal or
State ambient air quality standard
(including releasing emissions that
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to
substantial pollutant concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a
substantial number of people?
Potentially
· Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporati
on
Page 8
Less Than ~'-'"'~qO
SignificantlImpact Impact
X
X
Discussion:
(a): Applicable air quality criteria for evaluation of the project's impacts are federal air pollutant
standards established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and reported as
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), and the California Ambient Air Quality
Standards (CAAQS), which are equal to or more stringent than the federal standards.
The California Air Resources Board (CARB) coordinates and oversees both State and federal air
quality control programs in California. Santa Clara County is under the jurisdiction of the Bay
Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD).
The BAAQMD Guidelines indicate that the size of the proposed Project (776 net square feet)
would not result in the generation of potentially significant emissions from trip generation during
Project operation. Therefore, no significant air quality impacts during Project operation are
expected to occur.
(b): The project site is located within the southem region of the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin.
The Bay Area Air Basin is currently classified as a "nonattainment" area for the federal and State
ozone standard, which means that the level of ozone during a one-hour period exceeds the State
standard of 0.09 parts per million (ppm) on more than one day per year, excluding those occasions
when a violation was caused by an exceptional event, as defined in the criteria. For particulate
matter less than 10 micrometers in diameter (PM~0), the Bay Area Air Basin is currently designated
as a "nonattainment" area for the State standard. All other pollutants are designated as
"attainment" or "unclassified" for federal standards and as an "attainment" area for the State
standard.
Construction equipment may emit small quantities of dust (fine particulate matter - PM~0) and
exhaust, but the concentrations of these emissions are not anticipated to be substantial, and would
E1¢ 41
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street Page 9
Prepared on August 2, 2002
be temporary. Construction vehicles would produce cumulatively insubstantial amounts of ozone
emissions. Short-term dust could potentially be produced during construction, but this would not
be a significant amount.
The proposed project would not violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an
existing or projected air quality violation.
(c): As described above, the proposed project would not result in any cumulatively considerable
net increase of ozone or PM10, the two criteria pollutants for which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard.
(d): The adjacent Institutional uses would be the nearest sensitive receptors. The small size of the
construction project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.
(e): The construction of the Project is not expected to create any objectionable odors.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporati ,
on
Less Than No
Significant Impact
Impact
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect,
either directly or through habitat
modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special status
species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game
or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on
any riparian habitat or other sensitive
natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, regulations or by
the California Department of Fish and
Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on
federally protected wetlands as defined
by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh,
vernal_p, ool, coastal, etc.) through direct
X
X
X
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street
Prepared on August 2, 2002
EIO*410
Page 10
Potentially
Significant
Impact
removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporati
on
No
Impact
d) Interfere substantially with the
movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory
wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or
ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree preservation
policy or ordinance?
Less Than
Significant
Impact
X
X
f) Conflict with the provisions of an
adopted Habitat Conservation Plan,
Natural Community Conservation Plan,
or other approved local, regional, or
State habitat conservation plan?
X
Discussion:
(a to d): No species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species or habitat for
such species are known to occupy the site according to the California Natural Diversity
Database; therefore, the project would have no foreseeable affect on such species. No riparian or
other sensitive habitat is known to exist at the project site; therefore, the project would not affect
such habitat. No wetland is known to exist at the project site; therefore, the project would not
affect wetlands. The developed urban project site does not lie within an established native
resident or migratory wildlife corridors. Because the proposed addition provides landscaped
areas around the building, the potential for wildlife to move through the site would be the same
with or without the project.
(e): The City of Campbell has a Tree Protection Ordinance which establishes regulations and
standards for the removal of significant trees on private property. Any tree which measures
twelve inches or greater in diameter, measured four feet above the adjacent grade is considered a
protected tree and requires a Tree Removal Permit. There are currently no trees on the site that
are proposed for removal in conjunction with this project. Therefore, the project will not conflict
with local measures to protect biological resources.
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street
Prepared on August 2, 2002
E10341
Page 11
(f): No adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or approved
local, regional, or State habitat conservation plans apply to the Project or the Project site.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporati
on
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of a historical resource X
as defined in §15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in
the significance of an archaeological
resource as defined in §15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including
those interred outside of formal
cemeteries?
X
X
X
Discussion:
(a): The Site contains a structure that is a designated City of Campbell Historic Landmark, which
qualifies as a historic resource as defined in §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. The present
owners applied for and obtained this designation in November 1993. The structure is historically
referred to as the Mrs. Bull House, who was the original resident. It is a one-story colonial
revival cottage that was built in approximately 1900. The new wood siding, windows, window
trim, and roof will match the main residence. The addition to the residence will not be visible
from the street. The new garage will be visible from the street but will be designed to be
consistent with the main house and include a carriage style wood door. The garage will provide a
covered parking space that will meet the requirements of the Zoning Code.
Additions to Historic Landmarks are regulated by Section 21.41.130 "Procedure to authorize
construction, demolition, relocation, or material change on a designated landmark or in an
historic district" of the Historic Preservation Ordinance (Chapter 21.41 of Title 21 (Zoning
Code) of the Campbell Municipal Code). This Section stipulates that any material change in the
exterior appearance of a designated Landmark through alteration or construction requires review
by the Historic Preservation Board and approval of Conditional Use Permit by the Planning
Commission.
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street
Prepared on August 2, 2002
E10541
Page 12
This application was referred to the Historic Preservation Board for review and comment at their
meeting of July 24, 2002. The Board determined that the proposed Project meets the
requirements of the Historic Preservation Ordinance and is consistent with the architectural
design and historic character of the structure. The Board passed a motion recommending
approval of the Conditional Use Permit to the Planning Commission. The Board determined that
the project is consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of
Historic Properties with Guidelines for Preserving, Rehabilitating, Restoring, and Reconstructing
Historic Buildings (Weeks and Grimmer, 1995).
The structure is protected from adverse changes by the Historic Preservation Ordinance. Since
the proposed project complies with the Ordinance it can be concluded that there is no substantial
evidence that this project would cause a substantial adverse change to the historic resource.
"Substantial adverse change" is defined as "physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or
alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of an historical
resource would be materially impaired" (CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5 subd (b) (1)).
(b and c): No archaeological, paleontological, or other cultural resources are known to exist on
the Site. New cultural resources are unlikely to be discovered during Project construction.
(d): The project site is currently developed and no human remains are known to exist on the Site.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporati
on
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to
potential substantial adverse effects,
including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake
fault, as delineated on the most recent
Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault
Zoning Map issued by the State
Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known
fault? Refer to Division of Mines and
Geology Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
X
X
X
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street
.. ~?~ P... a.r.~ d__ o.~_ A~_u. g u.s. . t__2:_2_O. ..O__2__ .................................
iii) Seismic-related ground failure,
including liquefaction?
iv) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or
the loss of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil
that is unstable, or that would become
unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site
landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as
defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform
Building Code (1994), creating
substantial risks to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately
supporting the use of septic tanks or
alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the
disposal of waste water?
EIO ,4 1
Page 13
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporati
on
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
X
X
X
X
X
Discussion:
(a to d): No geophysical impacts or substantial soil erosion will occur as a result of this project.
The site is not near any known earthquake fault and the project will be required to comply with
all State Building Code Standards to reduce the potential for geophysical hazards
(e): The project would not involve the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal
systems. Therefore, no impact would result.
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street Page 14
Prepared on August 2, 2002
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant Significant Impact
Impact with Impact
Mitigation
Incorporati
on
VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -- Would the pro ect:
a) Create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through the
routine transport, use, or disposal of
hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release
of hazardous materials into the
environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle
hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste within
one-quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included
on a list of hazardous materials sites
compiled pursuant to Government Code
Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it
create a significant hazard to the public
or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport
land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport,
would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in
the project area?
X
X
X
X
X
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street
Prepared on August 2, 2002
EiO 41o
Page 15
Potentially Less Than
Significant Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporati
on
f) For a project within the vicinity of a
private airstrip, would the project result
in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or
physically interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a
significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas
or where residences are intermixed with
wildlands?
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
X
X
X
Discussion:
(a and b): No routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials would be associated with
the Project. A slight hazardous potential would exist during Project construction when materials
and construction equipment are at the site; however, long-term hazard risk is very low. Hazard
risks during construction would be regulated by the City's standard conditions of approval and
would be required to be performed in accordance with State and federal hazardous materials
regulations and current Best Management Practices (BMPs) for construction activities.
(c to f): The proposed Project will not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, or substances within one-quarter mile of any school. The proposed Project
would not be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled
pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. The proposed Project would not be located
within an airport land use plan nor within two miles of a public airport or public use airport.
(g): The Project would not interfere with emergency response or evacuation plans.
(h): The Project is not located near any wildland areas and would not cause an increase in
wildland fire hazard.
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street
Prepared on August 2, 2002
EIO341
Page 16
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporati
on
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -- Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or
waste discharge requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater
supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume
or a lowering of the local groundwater
table level (e.g., the production rate of
pre-existing nearby wells would drop to
a level which would not support existing
land uses or planned uses for which
>ermits have been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing
drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner
which would result in substantial erosion
or siltation on- or off-site?
d) Substantially alter the existing
drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, or
substantially increase the rate or amount
of surface runoff in a manner which
would result in flooding on- or off-site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water
which would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned stormwater drainage
systems or provide substantial additional
sources of polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water
quality?
X
X
X
X
X
X
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street
Prepared on August 2, 2002
ElO 41
Page 17
Potentially
Significant
Impact
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood
hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood
Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance
Rate Map or other flood hazard
delineation map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard
area structures that would impede or
redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a
significant risk of loss, injury or death
involving flooding, including flooding as
a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
i J) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or
I mudflow?
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporati
on
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
X
X
Discussion:
(a and b): No violations of any water quality standards are expected from the proposed Project.
The proposed Project would not deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of
the local groundwater table level.
(c to f): The impervious surface area of the lot would increase by 10.4 percent as a result of the
Project which would result in a minor increase in surface runoff. However, all additional runoff
would be conveyed into the public storm drain system. These changes to the Project site would
not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the area due to the small size of the site.
Storm water would be conveyed into the public storm drain system. The course of streams or
rivers would not be affected by the proposed Project. The runoff from construction of the
proposed Project would not exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage
systems, provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff, or substantially degrade water
quality.
(g and h): The entire Project site is located in Flood Zone C, according to the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Flood Zone C is defined as an area
having minimal flooding.
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81N. First Street E10 41
Page 18
Prepared on August 2, 2002
(i and j): The Project site is located downstream of Lexington Reservoir, in an area defined by
the Association of Bay Area Governments as a dam failure inundation area. However, the
project is only an addition to an existing single-family residence, which would not expose any
additional people or structures to a new significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving
flooding. No additional exposure to water-related hazards is expected as a result of the Project
construction or operation.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporati
on
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established
community?
b) Conflict with any applicable land use
plan, policy, or regulation of an agency
with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general
plan, specific plan, local coastal
program, or zoning ordinance) adopted
for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating
an environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat
conservation plan or natural community
conservation plan?
X
X
Discussion:
(a to c): The Project site is an existing underdeveloped urban site which would not result in the
division of an established community. An analysis of the project's consistency with relevant
City policies and regulations will be provided in the Planning Commission staff report. The
project is consistent with the City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and Historic Preservation
Ordinance. No habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plans are applicable
to the Project site.
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street
Prepared on August 2, 2002
E10541
Page 19
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporati
on
Less Than No
Significant Impact
Impact
X. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a
known mineral resource that would be of
value to the region and the residents of
the State?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a
locally-important mineral resource
recovery site delineated on a local
general plan, specific plan or other land
use plan?
X
X
Discussion:
(a and b): No known mineral resources are present at the Project site.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporati
on
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XI. NOISE: -- Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation
of noise levels in excess of standards
established in the local general plan or
noise ordinance, or applicable standards
of other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation
of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels?
X
X
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81N. First Street
Prepared on August 2, 2002
c) A substantial permanent increase in
ambient noise levels in the project
vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic
increase in ambient noise levels in the
project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport
land use plan or, where such a plan has
not been adopted, within two miles of a
public airport or public use airport,
would the project expose people residing
or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a
private airstrip, would the project expose
people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporati
on
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
X
X
X
X
Discussion:
(a-d): The proposed project is a residential development that will be consistent with uses in the
surrounding neighborhood and the project is not anticipated to create any additional noise
impacts beyond that of normal residential use. Noise associated with construction of the project
will be mitigated by the conditions of approval of the project, which will include limitations on
days and times construction activities are permitted on site in compliance with the City of
Campbell Municipal Code.
(e and f): The Project would not be located within and airport land use plan or within two miles
of an airport. The Project would not be located within the vicinity of a private airstrip.
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street
Prepared on August 2, 2002
Page 21
Potentially Less Than
Significant Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporati
I on
XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING -- Would the project:
Less Than No
Significant Impact
Impact
a) Induce substantial population growth
in an area, either directly (for example,
by proposing new homes and businesses)
or indirectly (for example, through
extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of
existing housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of
people, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
X
X
X
Discussion:
(a): The project is a minor residential addition to an existing single-family residence and would
not directly or indirectly induce substantial population growth in the area.
(b and c): The project would not result in the displacement of existing housing or people,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporati
on
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically
altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street
_.P.r.~E~_e~_.o.n__A_u_g_ .u..s t__2 :.~2~ ~P_2. .....................................................................
Fire protection?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporati
on
Less Than
Significant
Impact
X
Police protection? X
Schools? X
Parks? X
Other public facilities?
No
Impact
X
Discussion:
(a): The Project would not require additional public services such as fire, police services, and
street maintenance beyond what is currently required for the existing single-family residence.
Potentially Less Than
Significant Significant
Impact ~ with
]Mitigation
Incorporati
on
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XIV. RECREATION:
a) Would the project increase the use of
existing neighborhood and regional parks
or other recreational facilities such that
substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational
facilities or require the construction or
expansion of recreational facilities that
might have an adverse physical effect on
the environment?
X
X
Discussion:
(a and b): The Project would not increase demand for existing recreational facilities nor would it
involve the construction or expansion of recreational facilities.
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street
Prepared on August 2, 2002
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporati
on
Less Than I No
Significant Impact
Impact
XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC -- Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic that is
substantial in relation to the existing
traffic load and capacity of the street
system (i.e., result in a substantial
increase in either the number of vehicle
trips, the volume to capacity ratio on
roads, or congestion at intersections)?
b) Exceed, either individually or
cumulatively, a level of service standard
established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads
or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic
patterns, including either an increase in
traffic levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or
dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
X
X
X
X
e) Result in inadequate emergency X
access?
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? I X
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans,
or programs supporting alternative
transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle
racks)?
X
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street
Prepared on August 2, 2002
Discussion:
(a and b): The project would not cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the
existing traffic load and capacity of the street system. The existing use of the project site as a
single-family residence would continue and not change.
(c): The Project would not result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in
traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks.
(d and e): No physical changes in roadway configurations are proposed for the Project. The
Project will be required to comply with all City and Santa Clara County Fire Department
standards for emergency access.
(f): The project as proposed would provide one covered parking space and approximately four
uncovered parking spaces. The proposed project is required under the Parking and Loading
Ordinance to provide two covered parking spaces and two uncovered parking spaces, for a total
of four parking spaces. The deficiency of one covered parking space is made up for by the
provision of an extra uncovered parking space. This would not result in an inadequate parking
capacity.
(g): The Project would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting
alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks). The Project will be located within
waking distance to the new Downtown Campbell VTA Light Rail Station.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporati
on
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS -- Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment
requirements of the applicable Regional
Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of
new water or wastewater treatment
facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
X
X
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street
Prepared on August 2, 2002
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Incorporati
on
c) Require or result in the construction of
new storm water drainage facilities or
expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies
available to serve the project from
existing entitlements and resources, or
are new or expanded entitlements
needed?
e) Result in a determination by the
wastewater treatment provider that
serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's
projected demand in addition to the
provider's existing commitments?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient
permitted capacity to accommodate the
project's solid waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, State, and local
statutes and regulations related to solid
waste?
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
X
X
X
X
X
Discussion:
(a and b): The utilities for the Project, including sewage disposal, would tie into existing service
mains and would not require new service systems. The Project would not generate significant
amounts of wastewater, and would therefore not exceed wastewater treatment requirements for
the Regional Water Quality Control Board or require the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities.
(c to e): Storm drainage for the Project will tie into existing service mains and will not result in
the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities. The
water supply for the Project would tie into existing service mains. Therefore, the Project would
not require new or altered service systems or new or expanded water resources or entitlements.
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street
Prepared on August 2, 2002
Page 26
(f and g): Existing capacity at local landfills can accommodate the amount of construction
material waste and no significant increase in solid waste generation is expected as a result of
Project operation. The Project would comply with federal, State, and local statutes and
regulations related to solid waste.
Potentially Less Than
Significant Significant
Impact with
Mitigation
Incorporati
on
Less Than
Significant
Impact
Impact
XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE:
a) Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods
of California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? "Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental
effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the
effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
j~ob__.abl__e_ fu__ture_p_roj ects)_?.
c) Does the project have environmental
effects that will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings, either directly
or indirectly?
X
X
X
Discussion:
(a): Construction and operation of the Project would not substantially degrade the quality the
environment; reduce the habitat, population, or range of species; nor eliminate important
examples of California history or prehistory.
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street
Prepared on August 2, 2002
F 10541
Page 27
(b): Based on the findings of this Initial Study, the Project would not have cumulatively
considerable environmental impacts.
(c): Based on the findings of the Initial Study, there is no evidence to demonstrate that the
Project would cause a substantial adverse effect on human beings, either directly or indirectly.
IV. DETERMINATION AND RECOMMENDATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
X
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the
project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and
an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or
"potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one
effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable
legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier
analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable
standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or
NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
August 2, 2002
DATE
SIGNATURE
Planner 11
TITLE
City of Campbell
NAME OF LEAD AGENCY
Initial Study for Residential Addition to 81 N. First Street
...........................................................................................................
IV. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
E1( $41
Page 28
Attachments:
1. 81 N. First Street Residential Addition Project Plans, prepared by Bruno Marcelic
Architect, 7/1/2002.
Reference Documents:
1. CEQA Guidelines, 1999 version.
2. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), 1999. BAAQMD CEQA
Guidelines-Assessing the Air Quality Impacts of Projects and Plans. December.
3. City of Campbell Historic Resources Inventory.
4. California Department of Parks and Recreation Form No. 523A Primary Record- 81
N. First Street, Campbell, Calif.
5. City of Campbell General Plan, November 6, 2001.
6. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map,
Community Panel Number 060338 0005 C, Revised Date December 7, 1982.
7. California Natural Diversity Database, 2000.
8. Santa Clara Valley Water District Inundation Map of Lexington Dam, March 1995.
9. Seismic Hazards Map, February 7, 2002.
CITY OF CAMPBELL
Community Development Department
CAMPBELL
September 3, 2002
NOTE THIS ITEM HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED FROM
SEPTEMBER 10, 2002, TO SEPTEMBER 24, 2002
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Campbell has set the time of
7:30 p.m., or shortly thereafter, on Tuesday, September 24, 2002, in the City Hall Council
Chambers, 70 North First Street, Campbell, California, for a Public Hearing to consider the
application of Todd and Tanya Lonac for a Conditional Use Permit (PLN2002-86) to allow a 776
square foot addition to a single-family residence that is a designated historic landmark (the Mrs.
Bull House) on property owned by Todd and Tanya Lonac at 81 N. First Street in a P-D-H
(Planned Development-Historic) Zoning District. A Negative Declaration has been prepared for
this project.
Interested persons may appear and be heard at this heating. Please be advised that if you
challenge the nature of the above project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues
you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing described in this Notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City of Campbell Planning Commission at, or prior to, the
Public Heating. Questions may be addressed to the Community Development Department at
(408) 866-2140.
Decisions of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council. Appeals must be
submitted to the City Clerk in writing within 10 calendar days of an action by the Commission.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, listening assistive devices are available
for all meetings held in the Council Chambers. If you require accommodation, please contact the
Community Development Department at (408) 866-2140, at least one week in advance of the
meeting.
PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF CAMPBELL
SHARON FIERRO
SECRETARY
PLEASE NOTE:
When calling about this Notice,
please refer to File No. PLN2002-86
Address: 81 N. First Street
70 North First Street · Campbell, California 95008-1436 · TEL 408.866.2140 · FAX 408.871.5140 · '~I)l) 408.866.2790