The URL can be used to link to this page

PD - 2005 r- of,; . CAII1 . ~~ f: ~ - {'"" U r'" , -' .>.. -s. ,.~',t.l~":~."'- " ~ ,-' ORCH 1'1'-<:> CITY OF CAMPBELL Community Development Department March 17, 2006 Mr. Hamid Adlparvar PCl Construction Inc. 630 Los Altos Rancho Shopping Center Los Altos, CA 94024 Re: Building Permit No: BLD2006-235 1821 W. Hacienda Avenue Dear Mr. Adlparvar: The Planning Division has reviewed your building plan permit submittal for a new single-family home located at the above referenced address. Per City Council Resolution No. 10591 for a Planned Development Permit, the following conditions of approval/issues need to be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit: 1. Condition of Approval No. 3 - Recordation of Parcel Map: The Planned Development Permit approval is contingent upon recordation of the Parcel Map to divide the subject property. The Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits. 2. Condition of Approval No.4 - Landscape and Irrigation Plan: The applicant shall submit a final landscape and irrigation plan to the Planning Division for review and approval, prior to the issuance of building permits. The landscape and irrigation plan shall substantially conform with the approved conceptual landscape plan and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping Standards (WELS) and shall include all replacement trees as required for the Tree Removal Permit. The landscape plan that was submitted as part of the building permit does not accurately reflect the approved species of trees that are indicated on the City's approved set pfplans. 3. Condition of Approval No.5 - Tree Protection Plan: The applicant shall submit a tree protection plan for all protected trees to be retained on site or on adjacent lots that are impacted by the project, and shall contain specific information about the preservation of the trees during any grading or building on site. Such tree protection measures shall be installed prior to any demolition, grading, or building on the project site. No construction or trenching shall take place within the drip line of trees and a fence constructed of temporary cyclone fencing or wire mesh securely attached to poles driven into the ground shall be installed around the dripline of the tree. All trimming or branch removal from protected trees shall be completed by a certified arborist. The tree protection plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. Condition of Approval No.6 - Park Impact Fee: A park impact fee, based on a density range of less than six units per gross acre, is due upon development of the site. Credit shall be given for any existing single-family residence if the residence is demolished less than two years prior to the 70 North First Street. Campbell, California 95008-1436 . TEL 408.866.2140 . FAX 408.866.8381 . TDD 408.866.2i '- Page 2 of2 BLD2006-235 -1821 W. Hac' Ja Avenue payment of the required fee. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, 75% of this fee is due. The remaining 25% is due prior to issuance of a certificate of building occupancy. 5. Condition of Approval No.7 - Fences: All new fencing shall comply with all the provisions of Section 21.18.060 of the Campbell Municipal Code. The design and location of all fences shall be indicated on the plans for review and approval prior to issuance of any building permits for the project. Fencing along the property lines shall be replaced at the expense of the applicant, unless it is determined to be in good condition by the Community Development Director. 6. Condition of Approval No. 10 - Parking and Drivewavs: All parking and driveway areas shall be developed in compliance with the approved plans and Chapter 21.28 (Parking and Loading) of the Campbell Municipal Code. The applicant shall provide a decorative paving treatment within the walkways and driveways for the homes. The design and materials used for the decorative pavement shall be indicated on the building permit plans and shall be reviewed and approved prior to the issuance of building permits. 7. Condition of Approval No. 11 - Contractor Contact Information Posting: The project site shall be posted with the name and contact number of the lead contractor in a location visible from the public street prior to the issuance of building permits. 8. Exterior Materials & Colors: The colors and type of materials for the exterior of the home, including the roof material and color, shall be indicated on the elevations and shall be consistent with the approved material sample board, which was approved by the City Council. The following changes shall be made to the elevations to comply with the approved material sample board: a. The exterior building materials are shown as a stucco wall material and a concrete s-tile roofing material. The plans shall be revised to reflect the approved exterior materials which are Certain Teed cedar stained shingle siding wall material and flat concrete roof tiles in a light tan color. b. The front porch guard rail and posts material shall be revised to wood, not metal. c. The elevations shall indicate wood trim and window sills on all windows of the home to be painted the approved trim color of dark green. Thank you for the opportunity to review these plans. Please submit your revised drawings to the Building Division. lf you have any questions regarding the comments contained in this letter, please feel free to contact me at (408) 866-2193 or by email atstephaniew@citvofcampbell.com. Sincerely, s!f~ WilLj- Planner II cc: Frank Mills, Senior Building Inspector Jackie Young Lind, Senior Planner P..... oon.ot & reoeipt for the 'onowlng mo,...: ACCT. ITEM. . ENCROACHMENTPERMrr U22 Applio.Uon fM Non-UtHlty Enoro.ch,.,.nt ~rm/t Minor Enol'Ollohment P.rmtt < $&.000 A.1 Flrot Pennlt N. F..I 8ub.......... Utlulv Enora..h....'" - ArteMiICola.ctor 8t,..t R_ident.' StraetJOther ArM_ PI_n Check D.Dallt 2% of Enam-rl Eltlnwte Faithful ParfOrmlnoe 8eourilY (FPS LAbor and Mlteriall ~uritv Monumentation s.ourltv C.oh 0;000_ Plan Check" ....pIOtton F.. (Non-Utility) Engr.Elil. < $2&0,000 Enar. E.t. >1260,000 UIIIIlv < $100 DOG Minimum Chi".. Per Looation ConduttalPlpell".. up to 600 F_t Above 100 UnMr Feet Mlnho-.NauttalEtc. Po" SetIR.moval at,.. Tree PlantlnalR.maval Utllllv > $100 DOO atonl'" Contal..r PermIt Proieot Planl .. SNOlfioation. Standard 8peolfkaaUona .. Oatalla Coo'" of Enalnaartna Maa. .. Plans AII....I Plot 24- x 38- AlKIaI Print .112- x 11- AllrialSHrch F_ MtID11 .nd Pla.... 24 - X 38- 4722 Penstt...: Failure to ....toN nubllo Improv.ments 4722 PeNtU..: Fsllu... to Go"..,t un..f. oondltions 4722 Work Without Permits LAND DEVELOPMENT 4722. Lot Line Adlultnwnt 4722 P..".I MeD (4 Lot. or Lel~\ 4722 Fi.,.l Tract Men 16 or MaN Lot. 4722 Certlfiaata of Coma*noe 4722 Certificate of COrf'Htion 4722 ONdlnn .. DraIMDe Plan lteviaw 81_ Foml" LoI Site < 10,000 ..f. atla> 10 000 I.f. < Aa... Slta>1 Mi... Notarv Fee IMr .la,..tUN Vaoation ot Public StrMta II e........nta AI....ment BagNiQllUon Dr R..pportionmant Fll'Ilt Split Each AddltloMI Lot Storm Omnaga ,.,.. F_ P.r Ac... -ActuaICO.tPlua2D%~""-dlNo_Io~.I_ri . dO. '. '" FDA '.,' - . ~., . '. J' . . . crrvCLERK RE"':'''''''' r"'~ ..... ONLY Dolo AIle.R.!.,.... .2."11;,..:""::,., ~r,;~~ n.... .,'"l>.... ~! ~T ~~~~~h .', .,. I 1:1' 1\ _: ~. . ~, Dlll/"lNlIoI. j:\Iorm.~_'t.rm06-01.>d.' //Y_1J/l..J TO: CIlyC"'" 2203 22D3 22D3 2203 22D3 4722 2203 4722 .. 2203 4820 511.7424 TRAFFIC atHER NAME OF APPLICANT NAME OF PAYOR ADDAESS ~ -o/~~. ~d, . (f) ~ ---- PU8UC WORKS DEPARTMENT RECEIPT EflllOtiva July 16,2008 we 7.flDw - ~1- 19li~t-/f32..1 \1\.1 i1~ ,.,j .'J. Ave PUBUC WORKS ALE NO. PROPERTY ADORESS AMOUNT ($215.00) ($126.00) $125.00 $550.00 poo.OOl $500 mini 100%.' ENOA.E8T.I 100%.' ENOR. E8T. 100%.' ENOA.EST.\ 4%.' Enar. E.IV$lOO mln/S10,000 ....xl :7. O"""OCJ - I J"t'~.4-- 4'4~3- R1t {fQ1f.2 ~i( If'l 't'2- Qt~f4-'" (13%.' ENOR.EST .) IDenn.tt .'" of innr. EatJS30,OOO mln .. 4780 4750 4180 4710 ($2lO.00) ($2.2l11l1 ($U5llt1 ($12l.D0Ie0) ($126.00IM) 1$146.001 AatUIII Coal + 20% - . 1$12&.00 Praloa' N.. -'$1IPa $1UiOlBk /$54.00 $26.00 $26.00 $12.00 fS1001Ca....ar Oav\ Munl Cod_ Sac.11.34.D1(n tS1001C.iIInd.r 'Oav~ t. TI.... ......'...b.. _I 1$800.001 /$3 4OO.0D + $751101 $4'00.00 + $1D011oI\ $I6D.OOI . 1$400.001 4722 4722 4722 $200.00\ $lOO.OO\ $800.001 $1,20D.00) $10.001 $2,200.001 ($725.00) $200.00 (A.l $2,120.001 (Mu_~R.. $2.385.0D) All other S2,eso.oo '-\'40:>,' -.2t'V'i\-l.. awt,w. 4721 :z /J 0...., %5 P.rkland DedloaUon F_ 7&%126% D.... UDftn C.rt. of OooUMRCV} Paolo- 4725 4128 4725 4728 412' 4721 4271 4721 Int'l'IllClIon Tum Counts /Two-Hour Count~ Int.,.action Tum Count,'a.m. Dr P.rn. DMk.' T...fflo Ftow Man tOal1v Tramo Vo'urne. C.mabell Traff~ Modal Full Soo~ A.a....manU e.m"'" T,.ffio Model Reduoad SoODll M....ment 810NII Tlmln. In'a......lon Truck plII'fntta No P.rklna Slana $78.&01 $1&0.00 $32.00 Aoluol Aatuat $I21Hr $18.001-' lrin\ $1/eaoh Dr $261100 . i~.^^,' I II.LA" ,d TOTAL 22, Q)2-'1. 2.'-) I IL.J" i rl\ . I UM PHONE ~ -CJ+,; -q",'W ZIP ~Ao z..+ f,Jx] tveN\lV\l ~Aie L.~ A i+z,c:; rA \ "~'l~:\:/ "'/} .i{ .~:;':;",:;; l.:~..; '.J;..Fi','::::4:.;).. ..""'i'; .\ y ...,.".... .... I'" " .... - . '., :.'.: '. ':'. . . . .\':.'; \ _'f . In ,'.. . ! . . ,,,..:..'.'.,..\ ,.~ lU " "' - .".....,.. ./ " CITY OF CAMPBELL, CA \ CA Cll~ Of CA~rBEL~, 01GGG1S911Z6 RECVD BY: JUDYS 01000189425 . PAYOR: HAMID ADLPARVAR TODAY'S DATE: 08/14/06 REGISTER DATE: 08/14/06 TIME: 16:13:07 ~ECVD B~: JUD~S R PA~OR' ~AMID ADLP~R~~ 10D~~~S D~lE: Oa/14~~~, lIME: 16:14:35 RE131S1ER DAlE: OS/l I 0 AMOUN.l lIESCRIP1'1(}N IN.13 f ill ,1I33.00 "~Q & SUBDIV flL ,. i9l\3.00 E""r. EEl;:;. n~.' '1"" S10Rl'\ DRAIN. f -..'E ..11,039....J PAR\\lAH11 UtDICAHON. r _-----------.:-:;: i1'1,l\6..;.;...J 101 AL WE: DESCRIPTION AMOUNT REF DEPOSITS -101.2203 $1,364.00 ~--------------- TOTAL HUE: $1,364.00 TENDEF:ED: CHANGE: $1,364.00 '$.00 \ ,\ \\ o lENDEREt\: C~ANGE: ~,"" '1" 'Hi ,'1o.J....J ...00 ~ CITY OF CAMPBELL, CA RECVD BY: JUDYS 01000189424 PAYOR: HAMID ADLPARVAR TODAY'S DATE: 08/14/06 REGISTER DATE: 08/14/06 TIME: 16:12:33 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT REF DEPOSITS -101.2203 $5,000.00 ---------------- TOTAL nUE: $5,000.00 TENDERED: CHANGE: $5,000.00 $.00 , \ ...j "0- 't \ ( ! J .. ... -\...O~'CA-'11A<9 !:: ~ u ... o 0 ~ ~ .,. , '" ,-' .O.tCH",,9. City of Campbell -- Community Development Department 70 N. First Street, Campbell, CA 95008 MEMORANDUM To: From: Ed Arango, Public Works Department Stephanie Willsey, Planning Division csW Date: February 1, 2006 Subject: 1819 W. Hacienda Ave. - Parcel Map & Grading and Drainage Plan The following conditions of approval need to be addressed prior to recordation of the Parcel Map: I. Park Impact Fee: A park impact fee, based on a density range of less than six units per gross acre, is due upon development of the site. Credit shall be given for any existing single-family residence if the residence is demolished less than two years prior to the payment of the required park impact fee. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, 75% of this fee is due. The remaining 25% is due prior to issuance of a certificate of building occupancy. 2. Demolition of Structures: Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map the applicant shall obtain a demolition permit from the Building Division for the demolition of all non-conforming structures. The following changes need to be made to the grading and drainage plans: 1. The driveway width for Lot B shall be 12 feet to accommodate a three-foot planter strip along the eastern property line. 2. The new home on Lot B was approved as a two-story home. The plans should reflect that the new home is a two-story home, not a one-story home. of,;' CAII1 . ~..... .l..." '<.T !:::: ~ U r- ,..\ 1-~ >. " ,-' OJ/CH i'I'-C' CITY OF CAMPBELL City Clerk's Office December 13, 2005 Mr. Hamid Adlparvar 650 Rancho Shopping Center Los Altos, CA 94024 Dear Mr. Adlparvar: At the regular meeting of December 12, 2005, the City Council gave second reading to and thereby formally adopted Ordinance No. 2065. This Ordinance approves a Zoning Classification Change (PLN 2004-109) from R-1-9 (Single Family Residential) to P-D (Planned Development) for property owned by Mr. Jack Bates located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue. The Ordinance will become effective thirty days from the date of adoption. A certified copy of Ordinance No. 2065 is enclosed for your records. Please note that the time within which judicial review of this action must be sought is governed by Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, unless another statute (such as California Government Code Section 65009 or some other applicable provision of law) sets forth a more specific time period. Should you have any questions in regard to the City Council's action, please do not hesitate to contact this office (866-2117) or Stephanie Willsey, Planner I, Community Development Department. Sincerely, --) // ! / i' / / L Anne Bybee City Clerk Enc. cc. Mr. Jack Bates, 1425 Villa Drive, Los Altos, CA 94024 Stephanie Willsey, Planner I 70 North First Street. Campbell, California 95008-1436 . TEL 408.866.2117 . FAX 408.374.6889 . TDD 408.866.2790 ORDINANCE NO. 2065 BEING AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL APPROVING A ZONING CLASSIFICATION CHANGE (PLN2004-109) FROM R-1-9 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO P-D (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) ON PROPERTY OWNED BY MR. JACK BATES LOCATED AT 1819 W. HACIENDA AVENUE IN AN R-1-9 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT. APPLICATION OF MR. HAMID ADLPARVAR, ON BEHALF OF MR. JACK BATES. FILE NO.: PLN2004-109. The City Council of the City of Campbell does ordain as follows: SECTION ONE: That the Zoning Map of the City of Campbell is hereby changed and amended by adopting the attached Exhibit A, entitled Map of Said Property, as per the application of Mr. Hamid Adlparvar, on behalf of Mr. Jack Bates, for approval of a Zoning Classification Change (PLN2004-109) for property located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue from R-1-9 (Single Family Residential) to P-D (Planned Development). SECTION TWO: This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days following its passage and adoption shall be published once within fifteen (15) days upon passage and adoption in the Campbell Express, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Campbell, County of Santa Clara, State of California. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of December following role call vote: , 2005, by the AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Burr, Hernandez, Furtado, Watson, Kennedy None None None ATTEST: ~ i/ Anne Bybee, City Clerk Exhibit A Map of Said Property 1819 W. Hacienda Ave. Zone Change Legend - City Limits - Parcel Lines ..- of,; .CAII1~ ~. '. <f> !::::: ~ u . r'" .-. S1 ~~ ~(l.A ~ \,:). -' ;.. 1- - .. ~ ,-' O~CH I' \<<). CITY OF CAMPBELL City Clerk's Office November 17, 2005 Hamid Adlparvar 650 Rancho Shopping Center Los Altos, CA 94024 Dear Mr. Adlparvar: At the regular meeting of November 15, 2005, the City Council held a public hearing to consider your application, on behalf of Mr. Jack Bates, for approval of a Zone Change (PLN 2004-109) from R-1-9 (Single Family Residential) to P-D (planned Development; a Tentative Parcel Map (pLN 2004-110) for a lot-lot sub-division; a Planned Development Permit (PLN 2004-111) to allow the construction of two new single-family homes; and a Tree Removal Permit (pLN 2005-65) to remove six protected trees (five Incense Cedars and one Acacia) on property owned by Mr. Jack Bates located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue. After hearing public testimony and following City Council discussion and deliberation, the City Council took the following action: 1. Gave first reading to Ordinance 2065 approving a Zoning Classification change (PLN 2004-109) from R-1-9 (Single Family Residential) to P-D (planned Development) on property located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue. This Ordinance will receive fmal reading and adoption at the regular meeting of the Campbell City Council scheduled for December 12, 2005. A certified copy of the Ordinance will be forwarded to you at that time. 2. Adopted Resolution 10590 approving a Tentative Parcel Map (pLN 2004-110) for a two-lot subdivision on property located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue, incorporating Findings and subject to the Conditions of Approval. Continued ..... 70 North First Street. Campbell, California 95008-1436 . TEL 408.866.2117 . FAX 408.374.6889 . TDD 408.866.2790 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Page 2 3. Adopted Resolution 10591 approving a Planned Development Permit (pLN 2004-111) to allow the construction of two new single-family residences on property located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue, incorporating Findings and subject to the Conditions of Approval. 4. Adopted Resolution 10592 approving a Tree Removal Permit (PLN 2005-65) to remove six protected trees (five Incense Cedars and one Acacia) on property located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue, incorporating Findings and subject to the Conditions of Approval. A certified copy of the above mentioned Resolution is enclosed for your records. Please note that the time within which judicial review of this action must be sought is governed by Section 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure, unless another statute (such as California Government Code Section 65009 or some other applicable provision of law) sets forth a more specific time period. Should you have any questions in regard to the City Council's action, please do not hesitate to contact this office (866-2117) or Stephanie Willsey, Planner I, Community Development Department. Sincerely, /') /1 ~/f."/1 ,/ i..I," t ; ~e Bybee City Clerk Attaclunents: cc. Jack Bates, 1425 Villa Drive, Los Altos, CA 94024 Stephanie Willsey, Planner I, City of Campbell ,- RESOLUTION NO. 10590 BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL APPROVING A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (PLN2004-110) FOR A TWO-LOT SUBDIVISION ON PROPERTY OWNED BY MR. JACK BATES LOCATED AT 1819 W. HACIENDA AVENUE IN A P-D (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) ZONING DISTRICT. APPLICATION OF MR. HAMID ADLPARVAR, ON BEHALF OF MR. JACK BATES. FILE NO.: PLN2004-110. After notification and public hearing, as specified by law and after presentation by the Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed. After due consideration of all evidence presented, the City Council did find as follows with respect to application PLN2004-110: 1. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map will result in a density of four units per gross acre, which is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Low-Medium Density Residential (6-13 units per gross acre). 2. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the P-D (Planned Development) Zoning District and the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan. 3. The proposed subdivision layout allows access to natural air and light. 4. Each new lot created has adequate access to a public right-of-way. 5. The proposed front lot (Lot A) is 8,998 square feet and is 65 feet wide. 6. The proposed rear flag lot (Lot B) is 8,309 square feet exclusive of the required 15- foot wide access driveway and 10,385 square feet with the access driveway. The proposed lot width for Lot B is 80 feet. 7. The Tentative Parcel Map has been distributed to local agencies, including Pacific Gas and Electric, West Valley Sanitation District, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, and the Santa Clara Valley Water District. None of these agencies raised any concerns about providing services to the lots. 8. The project qualifies as a Categorically Exempt project per Section 15315, Class 15 (Minor Land Divisions) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the City Council further finds and concludes that: 1. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. City Council Resolution PLN2004-110 -- 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Approving a Tentative Parcel Map Page 2 2. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map does not impair the balance between the housing needs of the region and the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources. 3. The design of the Tentative Parcel Map provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities. 4. The proposed development will aid in the harmonious development of the immediate area. 5. No substantial evidence has been presented from which a reasonable argument could be made that shows that the project, as currently presented and subject to the required conditions of approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment. 6. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the conditions of approval and the impacts of the project. 7. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fees imposed upon the project and the type of development project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approves a Tentative Parcel Map (PLN2004-110) to allow for a two-lot subdivision on property owned by Mr. Jack Bates located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development) Zoning District. Where approval by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, Public Works Director, City Attorney or Fire Department is required, that review shall be for compliance with all applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines, ordinances, laws and regulations and accepted engineering practices for the item under review. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this development and are not herein specified. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division: 1. Approved Proiect: Approval is granted for a Tentative Parcel Map for a two lot subdivision on property located at 1819 West Hacienda Avenue. The Tentative Parcel Map shall substantially conform to the Tentative Parcel Map prepared by SMP Company and stamped as received by the Planning Division on September 22, 2005, except as may be modified by the conditions of approval herein. City Council Resolution PLN2004-110 -- 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Approving a Tentative Parcel Map Page 3 2. Approval Expiration: The Tentative Parcel Map approval is valid for a period of two years from the date of final City Council approval, unless an extension is granted prior to the expiration date. 3. Park Impact Fee: A park impact fee, based on a density range of less than six units per gross acre, is due upon development of the site. Credit shall be given for any existing single-family residence if the residence is demolished less than two years prior to the payment of the required park impact fee. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, 75% of this fee is due. The remaining 25% is due prior to issuance of a certificate of building occupancy. 4. Demolition of Structures: Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map the applicant shall obtain a demolition permit from the Building Division for the demolition of all non- conforming structures. 5. Recordation of Parcel Map: The Planned Development Permit approval is contingent upon recordation of the Parcel Map to divide the subject property. The Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. 6. Propertv Maintenance: The property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures shall be secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed from the property (Section 11.201 and 11.414, 1985 Ed. Uniform Fire Code). PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 7. Parcel Map: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the project, the applicant shall submit a parcel map for recordation upon approval by the City, pay various fees/deposits and submit the map in a digital format acceptable to the City. 8. Preliminarv Title Report: Upon submittal of the parcel map, the applicant shall provide a current (within the past 6 months) Preliminary Title Report. 9. Monumentation for Parcel Map: Prior to recordation of the parcel map, the applicant shall provide a cash deposit for setting all monuments shown on the map. Monuments shall be set per section 20.76.010 of the Campbell Municipal Code. 10. Occupancv: Prior to allowing occupancy for any and/or all buildings, the applicant shall have the required street improvements installed and accepted by the City, and the design engineer shall submit as-built drawings to the City. 11. Maintenance of Landscapina: Owner(s), current and future, are required to maintain the landscaped park strip and tree wells in the public right of way. This includes, but City Council Resolution PLN2004-110 -- 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Approving a Tentative Parcel Map Page 4 is not limited to: trees, lawn, plantings, irrigation, etc. Trees shall not be pruned in a manner that would not allow the tree to grow to a mature height. 12. Water Meter(s) and Sewer Cleanout(s): Existing and proposed water meter(s) and sewer c1eanout(s) shall be relocated or installed on private property behind the public right-of-way line. 13. Soils Report: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, applicant shall provide a soils report prepared by a registered geotechnical or civil engineer. 14. Utilities: All on-site utilities shall be installed underground per Section 21.18.140 of the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings or additions. Applicant shall comply with all plan submittals, permitting, and fee requirements of the serving utility companies. 15. Utilitv Coordination Plan: Prior to issuance of building permits for the site, the applicant shall submit a utility coordination plan and schedule for approval by the City Engineer for installation and/or abandonment of all utilities. The plan shall clearly show the location and size of all existing utilities and the associated main lines; indicate which utilities and services are to remain; which utilities and services are to be abandoned, and where new utilities and services will be installed. Joint trenches for new utilities shall be used whenever possible. 16. Pavement Restoration: Based on the utility coordination plan, the applicant shall prepare a pavement restoration plan for approval by the City Engineer prior to any utility installation or abandonment. Streets that have been reconstructed or overlaid within the previous five years will require boring and jacking for all new utility installations. West Hacienda Avenue has not been reconstructed or overlaid in the last 5 years. The pavement restoration plan shall indicate how the street pavement shall be restored following the installation or abandonment of all utilities necessary for the project. 17. Gradina and Drainaae Plan: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall conduct hydrology studies based on a ten-year storm frequency, prepare an engineered grading and drainage plan, and pay fees required to obtain necessary grading permits. The plans shall comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code including Chapters 10, 11, 18, 33, and Appendix Chapter 33. 18. Storm Drain Area Fee: Prior to recordation of the parcel map, the applicant shall pay the most current Storm Drain Area fee, currently set at $2,120.00 per net acre, which is $954.00. City Council Resolution PLN2004-110 -- 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Approving a Tentative Parcel Map Page 5 19. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Measures: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements, Santa Clara Valley Water District requirements, and the Campbell Municipal Code regarding stormwater pollution prevention. The primary objectives are to improve the quality and reduce the quantity of stormwater runoff to the bay. Resources to achieve these objectives include Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbook for New Development and Redevelopment ("CA BMP Handbook") by the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA), 2003; Start at the Source: A Design Guidance Manual for Stormwater Quality Protection ("Start at the Source") by the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA), 1999; and Using Site Design Techniques to Meet Development Standards for Stormwater Quality: A Companion Document to Start at the Source ("Using Site Design Techniques") by BASMAA, 2003. 20. Demolition: Prior to recording of the parcel map the applicant shall obtain a demolition permit and remove any nonconforming structures. 21. Street Improvements: Prior to recordation of the parcel map, the applicant shall execute a street improvement agreement, cause plans for public street improvements to be prepared by a registered civil engineer, pay various fees and deposits, post security and provide insurance necessary to obtain an encroachment permit for construction of the standard public street improvements, as required by the City Engineer. The plans shall include the following: a. Show location of all existing utilities within the new and existing public right of way. b. Relocation of all existing utilities including utility boxes, covers, poles, etc. outside of sidewalk area. No utility boxes, covers, etc. will be allowed in the sidewalk area. c. Removal of existing pavement structural street section to centerline. d. Installation of City approved street trees at 30 feet on center and landscaping turf. e. Installation of City standard curb, gutter, and sidewalk and ADA compliant driveway approaches. f. Installation of new engineered pavement structural section to centerline, as required by the City Engineer. g. Installation of asphalt concrete overlay per street pavement restoration plan for utility installation and/or abandonment, as required by the City Engineer. City Council Resolution PLN2004-110 -- 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Approving a Tentative Parcel Map Page 6 h. Installation of streetlights, conduits, conductors and related facilities in accordance with the City of Campbell's Street Lighting Policies. i. Installation of traffic control, stripes and signs. J. Construction of conforms to existing public and private improvements, as necessary . PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of November following roll call vote: , 2005, by the AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Burr, Hernandez, Furtado, Watson, Kennedy None None None APPR ATTEST: ~ Anne Bybee, City Clerk THE FOREGOING INSTRUMET~EISO~= AND CORRECT COPY OF ON FILE IN THIS OFFICE. EST: ANNE BYBEE. CITY CLERK. cnv PBaL CALIFORNIA (;y~ (J RESOLUTION NO. 10591 BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (PLN2004-111) TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO NEW SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ON PROPRETY OWNED BY MR. JACK BATES LOCATED AT 1819 W. HACIENDA AVENUE IN A P-D (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) ZONING DISTRICT. APPLICATION OF MR. HAMID ADLPARVAR, ON BEHALF OF MR. JACK BATES. FILE NO. PLN2004-111. After notification and public hearing, as specified by law and after presentation by the Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed. After due consideration of all evidence presented, the City Council did find as follows with respect to application PLN2004-111: 1. The density of the proposed project site is four units per gross acre, which is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Low-Medium Density Residential (6-13 units per gross acre). 2. The proposed project is consistent with the Planned Development Zoning Ordinance. 3. The project site is located on the north side of West Hacienda Avenue between Harriet Avenue and Del Lorna Drive. 4. The subject property is located on the San Jose/Campbell city border and is surrounded by town homes to the east and south and single-family homes to the north and west. The town homes to the south and single-family homes to the west are in the City of San Jose. 5. The site plan proposes the construction of two single-family homes, one on each proposed lot. 6. The proposed home on Lot A is a single-story home with an attached two-car garage and the proposed home on Lot B is a two-story home with an attached two-car garage. 7. Both homes have a traditional design with well-articulated architectural features. The elevations incorporate representative architectural features of the San Tomas Neighborhood including simple rectangular shaped forms, simple hipped and gabled rooflines, and tile roof. 8. The project provides four spaces per home, two covered spaces in the garages and two uncovered in the driveways. The parking is adequate to meet the needs of the proposed development. City Council Resolution PLN2004-111 -1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Approving a Planned Development Permit Page 2 9. Standard street improvements will be installed as part of the project including curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and lighting. 10. The project qualifies as a Categorically Exempt project per Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structure) of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the City Council further finds and concludes that: 1. The proposed development will result in a more desirable environment and use of the land than would be possible under any other zoning classification. 2. The development will be compatible with the General Plan of the City and will aid in the harmonious development of the immediate area. 3. The proposed development will not result in allowing more residential units than would be allowed by other residential zoning districts, which are consistent with the General Plan designation of the property. 4. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the neighborhood or the City as a whole. 5. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the conditions of approval and the impacts of the project. 6. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fees imposed upon the project and the type of development project. 7. No substantial evidence has been presented from which a reasonable argument could be made that shows that the project, as currently presented and subject to the required conditions of approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approves a Planned Development Permit (PLN2004-111) to allow the construction of two single-family homes on property owned by Mr. Jack Bates located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development) Zoning District, subject to the following conditions: Where approval by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, Public Works Director, City Attorney or Fire Department is required, that review shall be for compliance with all applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines, ordinances, laws and regulations and accepted engineering practices for the item under review. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply City Council Resolution PLN2004-111 -1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Approving a Planned Development Permit Page 3 with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this development and are not herein specified. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division: 1. Approved Proiect Approval is granted for a Planned Development Permit to allow the construction of two new single-family homes located at 1819 West Hacienda Avenue. The building designs and site design shall substantially conform to the project exhibits listed below, except as may be modified by the conditions of approval herein: a. Project plans stamped as received by the Planning Division on September 22, 2005. b. Colored elevation and material board stamped as received by the Planning Division on September 22, 2005. 2. Permit Expiration: The Planned Development Permit is valid for a period of two years from the date of final City Council approval. A building permit must be obtained within this two-year period or the Planned Development Permit shall be void. 3. Recordation of Parcel Map: The Planned Development Permit approval is contingent upon recordation of the Parcel Map to divide the subject property. The Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. Landscape and Irriaation Plan: The applicant shall submit a final landscape and irrigation plan to the Planning Division for review and approval, prior to the issuance of building permits. The landscape and irrigation plan shall substantially conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping Standards (WELS) and shall include all replacement trees as required for the Tree Removal Permit. 5. Tree Protection Plan: The applicant shall submit a tree protection plan for all protected trees to be retained on site or on adjacent lots that are impacted by the project, and shall contain specific information about the preservation of the trees during any grading or building on site. Such tree protection measures shall be installed prior to any demolition, grading, or building on the project site. No construction or trenching shall take place within the drip line of trees and a fence constructed of temporary cyclone fencing or wire mesh securely attached to poles driven into the ground shall be installed around the dripline of the tree. All trimming or branch removal from protected trees shall be completed by a certified arborist. The tree protection plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and City Council Resolution PLN2004-111 -1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Approving a Planned Development Permit Page 4 approval by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. Park Impact Fee: A park impact fee, based on a density range of less than six units per gross acre, is due upon development of the site. Credit shall be given for any existing single-family residence if the residence is demolished less than two years prior to the payment of the required fee. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, 75% of this fee is due. The remaining 25% is due prior to issuance of a certificate of building occupancy. 7. Fences: All new fencing shall comply with all the provisions of Section 21.18.060 of the Campbell Municipal Code. The design and location of all fences shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of any building permits for the project. Fencing along the property lines shall be replaced at the expense of the applicant, unless it is determined to be in good condition by the Community Development Director. 8. Property Maintenance: The property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris, and weeds until the time that actual construction commences. Any vacant existing structures shall be secured, by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed from the property (Section 11.201 and 11.414, 1985 Ed. Uniform Fire Code). 9. On-Site Liahtina: Any proposed on-site lighting shall be shielded away from adjacent properties and directed on site. The design, type, lighting intensity, and iocation of any exterior lighting fixtures shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of a building permit for such lighting. Lighting fixtures shall be of a decorative design to be compatible with the development and shall incorporate energy saving features. 10. Parkin" and Drivewavs: All parking and driveway areas shall be developed in compliance with the approved plans and Chapter 21.28 (Parking and Loading) of the Campbell Municipal Code. The applicant shall provide a decorative paving treatment within the walkways and driveways for the homes. The design and materials used for the decorative pavement shall be indicated on the building permit plans and shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. 11. Contractor Contact Information Postina: The project site shall be posted with the name and contact number of the lead contractor in a location visible from the public street prior to the issuance of building permits. 12. Utilities: All new on-site utilities shall be installed underground per section 21.18.140 (Undergrounding of Utilities) of the Campbell Municipal Code. City Council Resolution PLN2004-111 -1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Approving a Planned Development Permit Page 5 13. Roof Vents: The applicant shall coordinate mechanical and plumbing plans to minimize the number of roof vents that are visible from the street frontage. The applicant shall provide the location of such vents on the building plan elevations and roof plans, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, prior to issuance of building permits. 14. Construction Hours: Construction activities shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Saturdays. Construction is prohibited on Sundays and City Holidays unless an exception is granted by the Building Official. Building Division: 15. Permits Reauired: A building permit application shall be required for each new detached dwelling. The building permit shall include Electrical/Plumbing/Mechanical fees when such work is part of the permit. 16. Plan Preparation: This project requires plans prepared under the direction and oversight of a California licensed Engineer or Architect. Plans submitted for building permits shall be "wet stamped" and signed by the qualifying professional person. 17. Construction Plans: The conditions of approval shall be stated in full on the cover sheet of construction plans submitted for building permit. 18. Size of Plans: The size of construction plans submitted for building permits shall be 24 inches by 36 inches. 19. Soils Report: Two copies of a current soils report, prepared to the satisfaction of the Building Official, containing foundation and retaining wall design recommendations shall be submitted with the building permit application. This report shall be prepared by a licensed engineer specializing in soils mechanics. 20. Site Plan: Application for building permit shall include a competent site plan that identifies property and proposed structures with dimensions and elevations as appropriate. Site plan shall also include site drainage details. 21. Foundation Inspections: A pad certificate prepared by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor shall be submitted to the project building inspector upon foundation inspection. This certificate shall certify compliance with the recommendations as specified in the soils report and the building pad elevation and on-site retaining wall locations and elevations are prepared according to approved plans. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer for the following items: a. pad elevation City Council Resolution PLN2004-111 -1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Approving a Planned Development Permit Page 6 b. finish floor elevation (first floor) c. foundation comer locations 22. Title 24 Enerav Compliance: California Title 24 Energy Compliance forms CF-1 R and MF-1 R shall be blue-lined on the construction plans. 8% X 11 calculations shall be submitted to the Building Division. 23. Special Inspections: When a special inspection is required by U.B.C. Section 1701, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be submitted to the Building Official for approval prior to issuance of the building permits, in accordance with U.B.C Section 106.3.5. Please obtain City of Campbell, Special Inspection forms from the Building Inspection Division Counter. 24. Non-Point Source Pollution Control: The City of Campbell standard Santa Clara Valley Non-point Source Pollution Control Program specification sheet shall be part of plan submittal. The specification sheet (size 24" X 36") is available at the Building Division service counter. 25. P.G.&E.: The applicant is advised to contact P.G.&E. as early as possible in the approval process. Service installations, changes and/or relocations may require substantial scheduling time and can cause significant delays in the approval process. The applicant should also consult with P.G.&E. concerning utility easements, distribution pole locations and required conductor clearances. 26. Construction Fencina: This project shall be properly enclosed with construction fencing to prevent unauthorized access to the site during construction. The construction site shall be secured to prevent vandalism and/or theft during hours when no work is being done. All protected trees shall be fenced to prevent damage to root systems. 27. Approvals ReQuired: The project requires the following agency approval prior to issuance of the building permit: a. West Valley Sanitation District (378-2407) b. Santa Clara County Fire Department (378-4010) c. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (Demolitions Only) d. School District: i. Campbell Union School District (378-3405) ii. Campbell Union High School District (371-0960) iii. Moreland School District (379-1370) iv. Cambrian School District (377-2103) Note: To determine your district, contact the offices identified above. Obtain the School District payment form from the City Building Division, after the Division has approved the building permit application. City Council Resolution PLN2004-111 -1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Approving a Planned Development Permit Page 7 FIRE DEPARTMENT 28. Formal Plan Review: Review of this development proposal is limited to accessibility of site access and water supply as they pertain to fire department operations, and shall not be construed as a substitute for formal plan review to determine compliance with adopted model codes. Prior to performing any work the applicant shall make application to, and receive from, the Building Division all applicable construction permits. 29. Reauired Fire Flow: The required fire flow for this project is 1,750 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure. The required fire flow is available from area water mains and fire hydrant(s), which are located at the required spacing. 30. Fire Apparatus (Enaine) Access Drivewav Reauired: Provide an access driveway with a paved all weather surface, a minimum unobstructed width of 12-feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet, six inches. Installations shall conform to Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications Sheet D-1. 31. Premises Identification: Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall contrast with their background. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 32. Parcel Map: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the project, the applicant shall submit a parcel map for recordation upon approval by the City, pay various fees/deposits and submit the map in a digital format acceptable to the City. 33. Preliminary Title Report: Upon submittal of the parcel map, the applicant shall provide a current (within the past 6 months) Preliminary Title Report. 34. Monumentation for Parcel Map: Prior to recordation of the parcel map, the applicant shall provide a cash deposit for setting all monuments shown on the map. Monuments shall be set per section 20.76.010 of the Campbell Municipal Code. 35. Occupancv: Prior to allowing occupancy for any and/or all buildings, the applicant shall have the required street improvements installed and accepted by the City, and the design engineer shall submit as-built drawings to the City. 36. Maintenance of Landscapina: Owner(s), current and future, are required to maintain the landscaped park strip and tree wells in the public right of way. This includes, but is not limited to: trees, lawn, plantings, irrigation, etc. Trees shall not be pruned in a manner that would not allow the tree to grow to a mature height. City Council Resolution PLN2004-111 -1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Approving a Planned Development Permit Page 8 37. Water Meter{s) and Sewer Cleanout{s): Existing and proposed water meter(s) and sewer cleanout(s) shall be relocated or installed on private property behind the public right-of-way line. 38. Soils ReDort: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, applicant shall provide a soils report prepared by a registered geotechnical or civil engineer. 39. Utilities: All on-site utilities shall be installed underground per Section 21.18.140 of the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings or additions. Applicant shall comply with all plan submittals, permitting, and fee requirements of the serving utility companies. 40. Utilitv Coordination Plan: Prior to issuance of building permits for the site, the applicant shall submit a utility coordination plan and schedule for approval by the City Engineer for installation and/or abandonment of all utilities. The plan shall clearly show the location and size of all existing utilities and the associated main lines; indicate which utilities and services are to remain; which utilities and services are to be abandoned, and where new utilities and services will be installed. Joint trenches for new utilities shall be used whenever possible. 41. Pavement Restoration: Based on the utility coordination plan, the applicant shall prepare a pavement restoration plan for approval by the City Engineer prior to any utility installation or abandonment. Streets that have been reconstructed or overlaid within the previous five years will require boring and jacking for all new utility installations. West Hacienda Avenue has not been reconstructed or overlaid in the last 5 years. The pavement restoration plan shall indicate how the street pavement shall be restored following the installation or abandonment of all utilities necessary for the project. 42. Gradina and Drainaae Plan: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall conduct hydrology studies based on a ten-year storm frequency, prepare an engineered grading and drainage plan, and pay fees required to obtain necessary grading permits. The plans shall comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code including Chapters 10, 11, 18, 33, and Appendix Chapter 33. 43. Storm Drain Area Fee: Prior to recordation of the parcel map, the applicant shall pay the most current Storm Drain Area fee, currently set at $2,120.00 per net acre, which is $954.00. 44. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Measures: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements, Santa Clara Valley Water District City Council Resolution PLN2004-111 -1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Approving a Planned Development Permit Page 9 requirements, and the Campbell Municipal Code regarding stormwater pollution prevention. The primary objectives are to improve the quality and reduce the quantity of stormwater runoff to the bay. Resources to achieve these objectives include Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbook for New Development and Redevelopment ("CA BMP Handbook") by the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA), 2003; Start at the Source: A Design Guidance Manual for Stormwater Quality Protection ("Start at the Source") by the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA), 1999; and Using Site Design Techniques to Meet Development Standards for Storm water Quality: A Companion Document to Start at the Source ("Using Site Design Techniques") by BASMAA, 2003. 45. Demolition: Prior to recording of the parcel map the applicant shall obtain a demolition permit and remove any nonconforming structures. 46. Street Imorovements: Prior to recordation of the parcel map, the applicant shall execute a street improvement agreement, cause plans for public street improvements to be prepared by a registered civil engineer, pay various fees and deposits, post security and provide insurance necessary to obtain an encroachment permit for construction of the standard public street improvements, as required by the City Engineer. The plans shall include the following: a. Show location of all existing utilities within the new and existing public right of way. b. Relocation of all existing utilities including utility boxes, covers, poles, etc. outside of sidewalk area. No utility boxes, covers, etc. will be allowed in the sidewalk area. c. Removal of existing pavement structural street section to centerline. d. Installation of City approved street trees at 30 feet on center and landscaping turf. e. Installation of City standard curb, gutter, sidewalk and ADA compliant driveway approaches. f. Installation of new engineered pavement structural section to centerline, as required by the City Engineer. g. Installation of asphalt concrete overlay per street pavement restoration plan for utility installation and/or abandonment, as required by the City Engineer. h. Installation of streetlights, conduits, conductors and related facilities in accordance with the City of Campbell's Street Lighting Policies. 1. Installation of traffic control, stripes and signs. City Council Resolution PLN2004-111 -1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Approving a Planned Development Permit Page 10 J. Construction of conforms to existing public and private improvements, as necessary. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of roll call vote: November , 2005, by the following AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Burr, Hernandez, Furtado, Watson, Kennedy None None None ATTEST: APPROVE /L~M'^- ne Bybee, City Clerk UMENi IS A iflUE E FOREGOING INSiflOf iHE OflIGI~ iH COfIfIECT coPY ~t1' ALE IN THIS oFFIcE- aN CLfRK. em A EST: ANN~ ~~ RESOLUTION NO. 10592 BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL APPROVING A TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (PLN2005-65) TO REMOVE SIX PROTECTED TREES (FIVE INCENSE CEDARS AND ONE ACACIA) ON PROPERTY OWNED BY MR. JACK BATES LOCATED AT 1819 W. HACIENDA AVENUE IN A P-D (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) ZONING DISTRICT. APPLICATION OF MR. HAMID ADLPARVAR, ON BEHALF OF MR. JACK BATES. FILE NO: PLN2005- 65. After notification and public hearing as specified by law and after presentation by the Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed. After due consideration of all evidence presented, the City Council did find as follows with respect to application PLN2005-65. 1. The proposed Tree Removal Permit is consistent with the Low-Medium Density Residential (6-13 units per gross acre) General Plan Land Use Designation and the P-D (Planned Development) Zoning District. 2. The project will include the removal of six protected trees (five Incense Cedars and one Acacia) because they would prohibit the construction of the driveways for the two new single-family homes. 3. The six 24-inch box replacement trees that are indicated on the landscape plan are consistent with the tree replacement requirements of the Tree Protection Regulations. 4. The proposed replacement trees will be a sufficient replacement for the trees to be removed and will continue the diversity of tree species found in the community. 5. A certified arborist prepared an arborist report for the project and identified all six trees as unhealthy and recommended that they be removed. Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the City Council further finds and concludes that: 1. The retention of the trees restricts the economic enjoyment of the property and creates an unusual hardship for the property owner by severely limiting the use of the property in a manner not typically experienced by owners of similarly zoned and situated properties, and the applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission that there are no reasonable alternatives to preserve the trees. 2. The trees are irreparably diseased and cannot be remedied through reasonable preservation and/or preventative procedures and practices such that the public health and safety requires their removal. City Council Resolution PLN2005-65 -1819 W. Hacienda -Tree Removal Permit Page 2 3. No substantial evidence has been presented from which a reasonable argument could be made that shows that the project, as currently presented and subject to the required conditions of approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment. 4. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the conditions of approval and the impacts of the project NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approves a Tree Removal Permit (PLN2005-65) to allow the removal of six protected trees (five Incense Cedars and one Acacia) on property owned by Mr. Jack Bates located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development) Zoning District. Where approval by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, Public Works Director, City Attorney or Fire Department is required, that review shall be for compliance with all applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines, ordinances, laws and regulations and accepted engineering practices for the item under review. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this development and are not herein specified. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division: 1. Approved Proiect: Approval is granted for a Tree Removal Permit to remove six protected trees (five Incense Cedars and one Acacia) on property located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue. The Tree Removal Permit shall only be valid in conjunction with an approved Planned Development Permit (PLN2004-111 ). 2. Replacement of Removed Trees: The applicant shall provide six 24-inch box replacement trees for the protected trees to be removed as part of the development. 3. Landscape and Irriaation Plan: The applicant shall submit a final landscape and irrigation plan to the Planning Division for review and approval, prior to the issuance of building permits. The landscape and irrigation plan shall substantially conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping Standards (WELS) and shall include all replacement trees as required for the Tree Removal Permit. 4. Tree Protection Plan: The applicant shall submit a tree protection plan for all protected trees to be retained on site or on adjacent lots that are impacted by the project, and shall contain specific information about the preservation of the trees during any grading or building on site. Such tree protection measures shall be installed prior to any demolition, grading, or building on the project site. No construction or trenching shall take place within the drip line of trees and a fence constructed of temporary cyclone fencing or wire mesh securely attached to poles driven into the ground shall be installed around the dripline of the tree. All trimming or branch removal from protected trees shall be completed by a certified arborist. The tree protection plan shall be submitted to the City Council Resolution PLN2005-65 -1819 W. Hacienda -Tree Removal Permit Page 3 Planning Division for review and approval by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of call vote: November , 2005, by the following roll AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Burr, Hernandez, Furtado, Watson, Kennedy None None None ATTEST: APPR~ ne P. Kennedy, Mayor ~ Anne Bybee, City Clerk THE FOREGOING INSTRUMi:NT IS A fHUE. AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORl<OINAl. ON FILE IN THIS OFFICE. A EST: ANNE BYBEE. CITY CI.I;RK, CITY o CAUFOANIA ..- 2. Minutes of Regular Meeting of November 15, 2005 This action approves the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 15, 2005. 3. Payment of Bills and Claims This action approves the payment of Bills and Claims in the amount of $1,272,166.88 as follows: bills and claims checks dated November 14, 2005 in the amount of $143,471.02; payroll related checks dated November 17, 2005 in the amount of $196,511.33; bills and claims checks dated November 21, 2005 in the amount of $398,413.81; and bills and claims checks dated November 28, 2005 in the amount of $533,770.72. 4. Ordinance 2065 approving a Zone Change (PLN 2004-109) from R-1-9 to PO on property owned by Mr. Jack Bates located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue in an R-1-9 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District (Second Reading/Roll Call Vote) Second reading of Ordinance 2065 approves a Zone Change (PLN2004-109) from R-1-9 to PO on property owned by Mr. Jack Bates located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue in an R-1-9 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District. 5. Monthly Investment Report - October 2005 This action is to note and file the Monthly Investment Report for October 2005. 6. Declaring Weeds a Public Nuisance and Scheduling Public Hearing (Resolution/Roll Call Vote) Resolution 10593 declares weeds a public nuisance and sets January 3, 2006 as the date for a public hearing to hear protests. 7. Authorizing the City Manager to Sign Agreement with County of Santa Clara Allowing the Pass Through of Various Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness Grant Funds (Resolution/Roll Call Vote) Resolution 10594 authorizes the City Manager to sign an Agreement with the County of Santa Clara that would allow for the pass through of various Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness grant funds to the City of Campbell. 8. Accept $500 Donation from Pete Yerkovich in memory of Joan Reynolds This action accepts a $500 donation from Pete Yerkovich in memory of Joan Reynolds, a long-term Museum volunteer. Minutes of 12/12/2005 City Council Meeting 2 .-..-. MIS: BurrlWatson - to approve the Consent Calendar. Motion adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Burr, Hernandez, Furtado, Watson, Kennedy NOES: Councilmembers: None ORAL REQUESTS There were no Oral Requests. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND INTRODUCTION OF ORDINANCES 7. Application of Mr. Hamid Adiparvar, on behalf of Mr. Jack Bates, for approval of the following applications: Zone Change (PLN 2004-109) from R-1-9 to PD; Tentative Parcel Map (PLN2004-110) for a two-lot subdivision; Planned Development Permit (PLN2004-111) to allow the construction of two new single-family homes; and Tree Removal Permit (PLN2005-65) to remove six protected trees (five Incense Cedars and one Acacia) on property owned by Mr. Jack Bates located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue in an R-1-9 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District (Introduction of Ordinance/Resolution/RolI Call Vote) This is the time and place for a public hearing to consider the Application of Mr. Hamid Adiparvar, on behalf of Mr. Jack Bates, for approval of the following applications: Zone Change (PLN 2004-109) from R-1-9 to PO; Tentative Parcel Map (PLN2004-110) for a two-lot subdivision; Planned Development Permit (PLN2004-111) to allow the construction of two new single-family homes; and Tree Removal Permit (PLN2005-65) to remove six protected trees (five Incense Cedars and one Acacia) on property owned by Mr. Jack Bates located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue in an R-1-9 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District. Community. Development Director Fierro - Staff Report dated November 15, 2005. Mayor Kennedy declared the public hearing open and asked if anyone in the audience wished to be heard. There being no one wishing to be heard, Mayor Kennedy closed the public hearing. MIS: BurrlWatson - that the City Council introduce Ordinance 2065 approving a Zone Change from R-1-9 (Single Family Residential) to PD (Planned Development) on property owned by Mr. Jack Bates located at 1819 W. Hacienda in an R-1-9 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District for first reading; adopt Resolution 10590 approving a Tentative Parcel Map for a two-lot subdivision for property owned by Mr. Jack Bates located at 1819 Minutes of 11/15/2005 City Council Meeting 3 W. Hacienda, incorporating Findings and subject to Conditions of Approval; adopt Resolution 10591 approving a Planned Development Permit to allow the construction of two new single-family residences on property owned by Mr. Jack Bates located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue in a PO (Planned Development) Zoning District, incorporating Findings and subject to Conditions of Approval; and adopt Resolution 10592 approving a Tree Removal Permit to remove six protected trees (five incense cedars and one acacia) on property owned by Mr. Jack Bates located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue, incorporating Findings and subject to Conditions of Approval. Motion adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Burr, Hernandez, Furtado, Watson, Kennedy NOES: Councilmembers: None The City Clerk read the title of Ordinance 2065. MIS: BurrlWatson - that further reading of Ordinance 2065 be waived. Motion adopted unanimously. UNFINISHED BUSINESS There were no agendized items. NEW BUSINESS 7. Approval of Special Event Application and Fee Waivers for 2006 Recreation Supervisor Ghione - Staff Report dated November 15, 2005. Mayor Kennedy asked if anyone in the audience wished to speak on this item. Lloyd Taylor appeared before the City Council on behalf of the DCBA Bunnies and Bonnets parade and requested a full fee waiver. Mr. Taylor stated that without the fee waiver he would need to cancel the event. Sally Howe, 334 E. Campbell Avenue, Campbell, appeared before the City Council and spoke in support of the fee waiver for the Bunnies and Bonnets Parade. City Council discussion followed during which Councilmembers expressed their support of a one time waiver of fees for the DCBA Bunnies and Bonnets Parade. MIS: Burr/Furtado - that the City Council approve the special event applications for 2006, adopt the findings as outlined in the Staff Report and approve the staff recommendation regarding fee waivers for event and staff costs associated with the events as stipulated in the report with the Minutes of 11/15/2005 City Council Meeting 4 .ot .c~~ .____ .r..,.A.~.. -. ~~. t:J ~ O' 0 1. .'. ~ ~ C' . O~CHAV." . TITLE City Council Report Item: Category: Date: 7. Public Hearing November 15,2005 Public hearing to consider the application of Mr. Hamid Adlparvar, on behalf of Mr. Jack Bates, for approval of a Zone Change (PLN2004-109) from R-1-9 (Single-Family Residential) to P-D (Planned Development); a Tentative Parcel Map (PLN2004-110) for a two-lot subdivision; a Planned Development Permit (PLN2004-111) to allow the construction of two new single-family homes; and a Tree Removal Permit (PLN2005- 65) to remove six protected tree$ (five Incense Cedars and one Acacia) on property owned by Mr. Jack Bates located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue in the R-1-9 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council take the following actions: 1. Take first reading of the attached Ordinance, incorporating the attached findings, approving a Zone Change from R-1-9 (Single-Family Residential) to P-D (Planned Development). 2. Adopt a Resolution, incorporating the attached findings, approving a Tentative Parcel Map for a two-lot subdivision, subject to the attached conditions of approval. 3. Adopt a Resolution, incorporating the attached findings, approving a Planned Development Permit to allow the construction of two new single-family homes, subject to the attached conditions of approval. 4. Adopt a Resolution incorporating the attached findings, approving a Tree Removal Permit to remove six protected trees (five Incense Cedars and one Acacia), subject to the attached conditions of approval. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The Plannin, Commission recommends that the City Council find that this project is Categorically Exempt under Section 15303, Class 3 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pertaining to the construction of two new single-family residences; and Section 15315, Class 15, of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pertaining to the division of property in urbanized areas into four or fewer parcels. City Council Report PLN2004-109/110/111 & PLN2005-65 - 68 Sunnyside Avenue November 15, 2005 Page 2 of 5 BACKGROUND The Planning Commission, at its meeting of October 25, 2005, forwarded a recommendation to the City Council by a 7-0 vote to approve the proposed project. No one from the public spoke at the public hearing regarding the proposed project. DISCUSSION Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is requesting approval of a Zone Change from R-1-9 (Single-Family Residential) to P-D (Planned Development), a Tentative Parcel Map for a two-lot subdivision, a Planned Development Permit for the construction of two single-family homes, and a Tree Removal Permit for the removal of six protected trees (five Incense Cedars and one Acacia) on property located at 1819 West Hacienda Avenue. Property Description: The project site is located on the north side of West Hacienda Avenue between Harriet Avenue and Del Lorna Drive. The subject property is located on the San Jose/Campbell city border and is surrounded by town homes to the east and south and single-family homes to the north and west. The town homes to the south and single- family homes to the west are in the City of San Jose. General Plan Desianation: The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Low-Medium Density Residential (6-13 units per gross acre). The proposed development of two single-family homes would result in a density of four units per gross acre, which is below the allowable density under the General Plan. Based on a density calculation alone, six units could be accommodated on the property within the allowable density range of the General Plan. The proposed project complies with the following General Plan Land Use Element Strategies: Strateav LUT-5.2a: Neiahborhood Compatibilitv: Promote new residential development and substantial additions that are designed to maintain and support the existing character and development pattern of the surrounding neighborhood, especially in historic neighborhoods and neighborhoods with consistent design characteristics. City Council Report PLN2004-1 09/11 0/111 & PLN2005-65 - 68 Sunnyside Avenue November 15, 2005 Page 3 of 5 Strateoy LUT-7.2n: Consistency With Plans: Ensure that new development and substantial remodeling projects are consistent with Specific Plans, Area Plans, City Standard Details, and adopted Streetscape Standards to create a cohesive design. Strateav LUT-9.3e: Buildina Materials: Encourage the use of long- lasting, high quality building materials on all buildings to ensure the long-term quality of the built environment. Strateav LUT -17.1 b: Landscaoina: Ensure that new developments provide new tree plantings, shrubs, greenery and other landscaping materials, and preserve existing trees and shrubs. San Tomas Area Neiahborhood Plan: The project site is located in the San Tomas Neighborhood and is subject to the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan (STANP). STANP requires that the minimum lot size for low density residential P-D projects be at least equal to the predominant minimum lot size requirement of parcels contiguous to, or directly across a public right-of-way from the subject site. In situations where no minimum lot size requirement is predominant, the Planning Commission and City Council shall determine the appropriate minimum lot size based on land use factors specific to the subject site. There is no predominant lot size surrounding the subject property. The property to the north is zoned R-1-9 and is developed with a single-family home. The properties to the west are located in San Jose and area zoned R-1-8 (which is a residential zoning at a density of eight dwelling units per acre, which results in a minimum lot size of 5,445 square feet) and are developed with single-family homes. The property to the south is located in San Jose and is zoned A(PD) with a maximum density of eight dwelling units per acre and is developed with an eight-unit town home development. The property to the east is zoned P-D and is developed with an 11-unit townhome development. Based on the surrounding zoning and developments, staff is recommending that the minimum lot size for this development be 8,000 square feet. Both of the proposed lots exceed 8,000 square feet. Both proposed homes also meet the development standards of the R-1-8 Zoning District in terms of setbacks, height restriction, building coverage, and floor area ratio. City Council Report PLN2004-109/110/111 & PLN2005-65 - 68 Sunnyside Avenue November 15, 2005 Page 4 of 5 Zonino Desionation: The current zoning classification for the project site is R-1-9 (Single-Family Residential) and the General Plan Designation is Low-Medium Density (6- 13 units per gross acre). The zoning designation and General Plan designation are currently inconsistent with each other because the General Plan designation allows a higher density than is allowed under the R-1-9 zoning designation. The corresponding zoning classification for the current General Plan designation is R-M (Multiple-Family Residential) or P-D. The proposed zoning classification change to P-D would bring the zoning classification and General Plan designation into conformance with each other. Subdivision Desion: The applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide the property into two residential lots. The proposed lot configuration would result in a lot fronting along West Hacienda Avenue and a rear flag lot with a 15-foot wide flag pole. The street access (flag pole) for the rear flag lot is proposed along the eastern side of the property. The proposed front lot (Lot A) is 8,998 square feet and is 65 feet wide. The proposed rear flag lot (Lot B) is 8,309 square feet exclusive of the required 15-foot wide access driveway and 10,385 square feet with the access driveway. The proposed lot width for Lot B is 80 feet. LandscaoinolTrees: The proposed development includes a Tree Removal Permit application for the removal of six protected trees (five Incense Cedar trees and one Acacia tree). The trees proposed to be removed are located within the driveway of the home on Lot A and the driveway for the home on Lot B. A certified arborist prepared an arborist report for the project and identified all six trees as unhealthy and recommended that they be removed. The arborist report states that the five Incense Cedars suffer from a canker disease and the Acacia tree is suffering from a fungal disease. The preliminary landscape plan shows the location for the six required 24-inch box replacement trees as well as many other trees and landscaping for the project. Parkino: The ST ANP requires that low-density residential P-D projects provide shared guest parking spaces totaling two spaces per unit in addition to the parking requirement for a single-family home, which is one covered and one uncovered parking space. The spaces located in the driveways of the units shall not be counted as guest parking spaces. Therefore, each proposed home is required to provide four spaces per unit, one of which must be covered, and does not include the driveway spaces. However, the City Council Report PLN2004-1 09/11 0/111 & PLN2005-65 - 68 Sunnyside Avenue November 15, 2005 Page 5 of 5 site plan provides four spaces per home, two covered spaces in the garages and two uncovered in the driveway. The City Council can approve any exception to the policies of the STANP. The Planning Commission found that the proposed four off-street parking spaces for each home are adequate to meet the demands of the future tenants. FISCAL IMPACTS None AL TERNA riVES 1. Approve the proposed project subject to additional and/or modified conditions of approval. 2. Deny the proposed project. 3. Continue for further review. Prepared by: Sl:e~ui.tJ WiJ/~ Stephanie Willsey, Planner I -----er- AttMJ?~~ Stlaron Fierro, Commun' Development Director Reviewed by: Approved by: Attachments: 1. City Council Ordinance (Zone Change) 2. City Council Resolution (Tentative Parcel Map) 3. City Council Resolution (Planned Development Permit) 4. City Council Resolution (Tree Removal Permit) 5. Planning Commission Resolutions and Meeting Minutes 6. Planning Commission Report Including Attachments ,- of,; . CAII1 . ~~ t: ~ - {'"" U r'" --.' -' .>.. 1- " (' ,-' ORCH ,A,R\) CITY OF CAMPBELL October 27, 2005 Community Development Department Mr. Hamid Adlparvar 327 Baywood Avenue San Jose, CA 95128 Re: PLN2004-109/110/111 & PLN2005-65 -1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Zone Change/Parcel Map/Planned Development Permit & Tree Removal Permit Dear Applicant: Please be advised that at its meeting of October 25, 2005, the Planning Commission took the following actions: 1. Adopted Resolution No. 3687 recommending approval of a Zone Change (PLN2004- 109) from R-1-9 to P-D; 2. Adopted Resolution No. 3688 recommending approval of a Tentative Parcel Map (PLN2004-110) to allow for a two-lot subdivision; 3. Adopted Resolution No. 3689 recommending approval of a Planned Development Permit (PLN2004-111) to allow the construction of two new single-family residences; and 4. Adopted Resolution No. 3690 recommending approval of a Tree Removal Permit (PLN2005-65) to allow the removal of six protected trees (five Incense Cedars and one Acacia) from the above reference property. This project will be reviewed by Council for approval at its meeting of November 15, 2005. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (408) 866- 2140. Sincerely, ~Wi\~ Stephanie Willsey Planner I Cc: Ed Arango, Public Works Chris Veargason, Fire Frank Mills, Building Jack Bates (Property Owner) 1425 Villa Drive Los Altos, CA 94024 70 North First Street. Campbell, California 95008-1436 . TEL 408.866.2140 . FAX 408.866.8381 . TDD 408.866.2790 -- RESOLUTION NO. 3687 BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL RECOMMMENDING APPROVAL OF A ZONING CLASSIFICATION CHANGE (PLN2004-109) FROM R-1-9 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO P-D (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) ON PROPERTY OWNED BY MR. JACK BATES LOCATED AT 1819 W. HACIENDA AVENUE IN AN R-1-9 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONING DISTRICT. APPLICATION OF MR. HAMID ADLPARVAR, ON BEHALF OF MR. JACK BATES. FILE NO.: PLN2004-109. After notification and public hearing, as specified by law, and after presentation by the Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed. After due consideration of all evidence presented, the Planning Commission did find as follows with respect to application PLN2004-109: 1. The proposed P-D zoning designation is consistent with the current Low-Medium Density Residential (6-13 units per gross acre) General Plan land use designation for the property. 2. The proposed density of four units per gross acre is within the allowed density range of 6-13 units per gross acre permitted in the Low-Medium Density Residential General Plan land use designation. 3. The zoning designation and General Plan designation are currently inconsistent with each other because the General Plan designation allows a higher density than is allowed under the R-1-9 zoning designation. The corresponding zoning classification for the current General Plan designation is R-M (Multiple-Family Residential) or P-D. 4. The proposed zoning classification change to P-D would bring the zoning classification and General Plan designation into conformance with each other. Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further finds and concludes that: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, policies, and actions of the General Plan. 2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or general welfare of the City. 3. The parcel is physically suitable (including absence of physical constraints, access, and compatibility with adjoining land uses, and provision of utilities) for the requested zoning designation and anticipated land uses/project. 4. The proposed zoning designation will not result in allowing more residential units than would be allowed by other residential zoning districts which are consistent with the General Plan land use designation of the property. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3687 PLN2004-109 -- 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue -- Zone Change from R-1-9 to P-D Page 2 5. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the conditions of approval and the impacts of the project. 6. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fees imposed upon the project and the type of development project. 7. No substantial evidence has been presented from which a reasonable argument could be made that shows that the project, as currently presented and subject to the required conditions of approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends approval of a Zoning Classification Change (PLN2004-109) from R-1-9 (Single Family Residential) to P-D (Planned Development) Zoning District on property owned by Mr. Jack Bates located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue in an R-1-9 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of October, 2005, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Alderete, Doorley, Ebner, Francois, Gibbons, Rocha and Roseberry None None None APPROVE . ~;1;~ .(J~ ~ h Gibbons, Chair -// NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Commissioners: Commissioners: ATTEST:..d~ Y ~ ".,r- Sharon Fierro, Secretary ,--.. RESOLUTION NO. 3688 BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL RECOMMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP (PLN2004-110) FOR A TWO-LOT SUBDIVISION ON PROPERTY OWNED BY MR. JACK BATES LOCATED AT 1819 W. HACIENDA AVENUE IN A P-D (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) ZONING DISTRICT. APPLICATION OF MR. HAMID ADLPARVAR, ON BEHALF OF MR. JACK BATES. FILE NO.: PLN2004-110. After notification and public hearing, as specified by law and after presentation by the Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed. After due consideration of all evidence presented, the Planning Commission did find as follows with respect to application PLN2004-110: 1. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map will result in a density of four units per gross acre, which is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Low-Medium Density Residential (6-13 units per gross acre). 2. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the P-D (Planned Development) Zoning District and the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan. 3. The proposed subdivision layout allows access to natural air and light. 4. Each new lot created has adequate access to a public right-of-way. 5. The proposed front lot (Lot A) is 8,998 square feet and is 65 feet wide. 6. The proposed rear flag lot (Lot B) is 8,309 square feet exclusive of the required 15- foot wide access driveway and 10,385 square feet with the access driveway. The proposed lot width for Lot B is 80 feet. 7. The Tentative Parcel Map has been distributed to local agencies, including Pacific Gas and Electric, West Valley Sanitation District, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, and the Santa Clara Valley Water District. None of these agencies raised any concerns about providing services to the lots. 8. The project qualifies as a Categorically Exempt project per Section 15315, Class 15 (Minor Land Divisions) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further finds and concludes that: 1. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. ~ Planning Commission R... ..olution No. 3688 PLN2004-110 -- 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Recommending Approval of a Tentative Parcel Map Page 2 2. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map does not impair the balance between the housing needs of the region and the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources. 3. The design of the Tentative Parcel Map provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities. 4. The proposed development will aid in the harmonious development of the immediate area. 5. No substantial evidence has been presented from which a reasonable argument could be made that shows that the project, as currently presented and subject to the required conditions of approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment. 6. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the conditions of approval and the impacts of the project. 7. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fees imposed upon the project and the type of development project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends approval of a Tentative Parcel Map (PLN2004-110) to allow for a two-lot subdivision on property owned by Mr. Jack Bates located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development) Zoning District. Where approval by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, Public Works Director, City Attorney or Fire Department is required, that review shall be for compliance with all applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines, ordinances, laws and regulations and accepted engineering practices for the item under review. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this development and are not herein specified. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division: 1. Approved Proiect: Approval is granted for a Tentative Parcel Map for a two lot subdivision on property located at 1819 West Hacienda Avenue. The Tentative Parcel Map shall substantially conform to the Tentative Parcel Map prepared by SMP Company and stamped as received by the Planning Division on September 22, 2005, except as may be modified by the conditions of approval herein. Planning Commission "'" ...olution No. 3688 PLN2004-110 -- 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Recommending Approval of a Tentative Parcel Map Page 3 2. Approval Expiration: The Tentative Parcel Map approval is valid for a period of two years from the date of final City Council approval, unless an extension is granted prior to the expiration date. 3. Park Impact Fee: A park impact fee, based on a density range of less than six units per gross acre, is due upon development of the site. Credit shall be given for any existing single-family residence if the residence is demolished less than two years prior to the payment of the required park impact fee. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, 75% of this fee is due. The remaining 25% is due prior to issuance of a certificate of building occupancy. 4. Demolition of Structures: Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map the applicant shall obtain a demolition permit from the Building Division for the demolition of all non- conforming structures. 5. Recordation of Parcel Map: The Planned Development Permit approval is contingent upon recordation of the Parcel Map to divide the subject property. The Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. 6. Property Maintenance: The property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures shall be secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed from the property (Section 11.201 and 11.414, 1985 Ed. Uniform Fire Code). PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 7. Parcel Map: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the project, the applicant shall submit a parcel map for recordation upon approval by the City, pay various fees/deposits and submit the map in a digital format acceptable to the City. 8. Preliminary Title Report: Upon submittal of the parcel map, the applicant shall provide a current (within the past 6 months) Preliminary Title Report. 9. Monumentation for Parcel Map: Prior to recordation of the parcel map, the applicant shall provide a cash deposit for setting all monuments shown on the map. Monuments shall be set per section 20.76.010 of the Campbell Municipal Code. 10. Occupancy: Prior to allowing occupancy for any and/or all buildings, the applicant shall have the required street improvements installed and accepted by the City, and the design engineer shall submit as-built drawings to the City. 11. Maintenance of Landscapinq: Owner(s), current and future, are required to maintain the landscaped park strip and tree wells in the public right of way. This includes, but Planning Commission R.. ...0lution No. 3688 PLN2004-110 -- 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Recommending Approval of a Tentative Parcel Map Page 4 is not limited to: trees, lawn, plantings, irrigation, etc. Trees shall not be pruned in a manner that would not allow the tree to grow to a mature height. 12. Water Meter(s) and Sewer Cleanout(s): Existing and proposed water meter(s) and sewer c1eanout(s) shall be relocated or installed on private property behind the public right-ot-way line. 13. Soils Report: Prior to issuance ot any grading or building permits for the site, applicant shall provide a soils report prepared by a registered geotechnical or civil engineer. 14. Utilities: All on-site utilities shall be installed underground per Section 21.18.140 of the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings or additions. Applicant shall comply with all plan submittals, permitting, and fee requirements of the serving utility companies. 15. Utilitv Coordination Plan: Prior to issuance of building permits for the site, the applicant shall submit a utility coordination plan and schedule for approval by the City Engineer for installation and/or abandonment of all utilities. The plan shall clearly show the location and size of all existing utilities and the associated main lines; indicate which utilities and services are to remain; which utilities and services are to be abandoned, and where new utilities and services will be installed. Joint trenches tor new utilities shall be used whenever possible. 16. Pavement Restoration: Based on the utility coordination plan, the applicant shall prepare a pavement restoration plan tor approval by the City Engineer prior to any utility installation or abandonment. Streets that have been reconstructed or overlaid within the previous five years will require boring and jacking for all new utility installations. West Hacienda Avenue has not been reconstructed or overlaid in the last 5 years. The pavement restoration plan shall indicate how the street pavement shall be restored following the installation or abandonment of all utilities necessary for the project. 17. Gradino and Drainaae Plan: Prior to issuance ot any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall conduct hydrology studies based on a ten-year storm frequency, prepare an engineered grading and drainage plan, and pay fees required to obtain necessary grading permits. The plans shall comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code including Chapters 10, 11, 18, 33, and Appendix Chapter 33. 18. Storm Drain Area Fee: Prior to recordation of the parcel map, the applicant shall pay the most current Storm Drain Area fee, currently set at $2,120.00 per net acre, which is $954.00. Planning Commission Rt;.~olution No. 3688 PLN2004-110 -- 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Recommending Approval of a Tentative Parcel Map Page 5 19. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Measures: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements, Santa Clara Valley Water District requirements, and the Campbell Municipal Code regarding stormwater pollution prevention. The primary objectives are to improve the quality and reduce the quantity of stormwater runoff to the bay. Resources to achieve these objectives include Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbook for New Development and Redevelopment ("CA BMP Handbook") by the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA), 2003; Start at the Source: A Design Guidance Manual for Stormwater Quality Protection ("Start at the Source") by the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA), 1999; and Using Site Design Techniques to Meet Development Standards for Stormwater Quality: A Companion Document to Start at the Source ("Using Site Design Techniques") by BASMAA, 2003. 20. Demolition: Prior to recording of the parcel map the applicant shall obtain a demolition permit and remove any nonconforming structures. 21. Street Improvements: Prior to recordation of the parcel map, the applicant shall execute a street improvement agreement, cause plans for public street improvements to be prepared by a registered civil engineer, pay various fees and deposits, post security and provide insurance necessary to obtain an encroachment permit for construction of the standard public street improvements, as required by the City Engineer. The plans shall include the following: a. Show location of all existing utilities within the new and existing public right of way. b. Relocation of all existing utilities including utility boxes, covers, poles, etc. outside of sidewalk area. No utility boxes, covers, etc. will be allowed in the sidewalk area. c. Removal of existing pavement structural street section to centerline. d. Installation of City approved street trees at 30 feet on center and landscaping turf. e. Installation of City standard curb, gutter, and sidewalk and ADA compliant driveway approaches. f. Installation of new engineered pavement structural section to centerline, as required by the City Engineer. g. Installation of asphalt concrete overlay per street pavement restoration plan for utility installation and/or abandonment, as required by the City Engineer. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3688 PLN2004-110 -- 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Recommending Approval of a Tentative Parcel Map Page 6 h. Installation of streetlights, conduits, conductors and related facilities in accordance with the City of Campbell's Street Lighting Policies. i. Installation of traffic control, stripes and signs. j. Construction of conforms to existing public and private improvements, as necessary. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of October, 2005, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Alderete, Doorley, Ebner, Francois, Gibbons, Rocha and Roseberry None None None NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Commissioners: Commissioners: j ATTEST: ~ y~ ../ Sharon Fierro, Secretary RESOLUTION NO. 3689 BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT (PLN2004-111) TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF TWO NEW SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES ON PROPRETY OWNED BY MR. JACK BATES LOCATED AT 1819 W. HACIENDA AVENUE IN A P-D (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) ZONING DISTRICT. APPLICATION OF MR. HAMID ADLPARVAR, ON BEHALF OF MR. JACK BATES. FILE NO. PLN2004-111. After notification and public hearing, as specified by law and after presentation by the Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed. After due consideration of all evidence presented, the Planning Commission did find as follows with respect to application PLN2004-111: 1. The density of the proposed project site is four units per gross acre, which is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Low-Medium Density Residential (6-13 units per gross acre). 2. The proposed project is consistent with the Planned Development Zoning Ordinance. 3. The project site is located on the north side of West Hacienda Avenue between Harriet Avenue and Del Lorna Drive. 4. The subject property is located on the San Jose/Campbell city border and is surrounded by townhomes to the east and south and single-family homes to the north and west. The town homes to the south and single-family homes to the west are in the City of San Jose. 5. The site plan proposes the construction of two single-family homes, one on each proposed lot. 6. The proposed home on Lot A is a single-story home with an attached two-car garage and the proposed home on Lot B is a two-story home with an attached two-car garage. 7. Both homes have a traditional design with well-articulated architectural features. The elevations incorporate representative architectural features of the San Tomas Neighborhood including simple rectangular shaped forms, simple hipped and gabled rooflines, and tile roof. 8. The project provides four spaces per home, two covered spaces in the garages and two uncovered in the driveways. The parking is adequate to meet the needs of the proposed development. Planning Commission RE:., Jlution No. 3689 PLN2004-111 -1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Recommending Approval of a Planned Development Permit Page 2 9. Standard street improvements will be installed as part of the project including curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and lighting. 10. The project qualifies as a Categorically Exempt project per Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structure) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further finds and concludes that: 1. The proposed development will result in a more desirable environment and use of the land than would be possible under any other zoning classification. 2. The development will be compatible with the General Plan of the City and will aid in the harmonious development of the immediate area. 3. The proposed development will not result in allowing more residential units than would be allowed by other residential zoning districts, which are consistent with the General Plan designation of the property. 4. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the neighborhood or the City as a whole. 5. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the conditions of approval and the impacts of the project. 6. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fees imposed upon the project and the type of development project. 7. No substantial evidence has been presented from which a reasonable argument could be made that shows that the project, as currently presented and subject to the required conditions of approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends approval of a Planned Development Permit (PLN2004-111) to allow the construction of two single-family homes on property owned by Mr. Jack Bates located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development) Zoning District, subject to the following conditions: Where approval by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, Public Works Director, City Attorney or Fire Department is required, that review shall be for compliance with all applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines, ordinances, laws and regulations and accepted engineering practices for the item under review. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply Planning Commission Rt. .Aution No. 3689 PLN2004-111 - 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Recommending Approval of a Planned Development Permit Page 3 with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this development and are not herein specified. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division: 1. Approved Proiect: Approval is granted for a Planned Development Permit to allow the construction of two new single-family homes located at 1819 West Hacienda Avenue. The building designs and site design shall substantially conform to the project exhibits listed below, except as may be modified by the conditions of approval herein: a. Project plans stamped as received by the Planning Division on September 22, 2005. b. Colored elevation and material board stamped as received by the Planning Division on September 22, 2005. 2. Permit Expiration: The Planned Development Permit is valid for a period of two years from the date of final City Council approval. A building permit must be obtained within this two-year period or the Planned Development Permit shall be void. 3. Recordation of Parcel Map: The Planned Development Permit approval is contingent upon recordation of the Parcel Map to divide the subject property. The Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. Landscape and Irriaation Plan: The applicant shall submit a final landscape and irrigation plan to the Planning Division for review and approval, prior to the issuance of building permits. The landscape and irrigation plan shall substantially conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping Standards (WELS) and shall include all replacement trees as required for the Tree Removal Permit. 5. Tree Protection Plan: The applicant shall submit a tree protection plan for all protected trees to be retained on site or on adjacent lots that are impacted by the project, and shall contain specific information about the preservation of the trees during any grading or building on site. Such tree protection measures shall be installed prior to any demolition, grading, or building on the project site. No construction or trenching shall take place within the drip line of trees and a fence constructed of temporary cyclone fencing or wire mesh securely attached to poles driven into the ground shall be installed around the dripline of the tree. All trimming or branch removal from protected trees shall be completed by a certified arborist. The tree protection plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and Planning Commission R~...olution No. 3689 PLN2004-111 - 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Recommending Approval of a Planned Development Permit Page 4 approval by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. Park Impact Fee: A park impact fee, based on a density range of less than six units per gross acre, is due upon development of the site. Credit shall be given for any existing single-family residence if the residence is demolished less than two years prior to the payment of the required fee. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, 75% of this fee is due. The remaining 25% is due prior to issuance of a certificate of building occupancy. 7. Fences: All new fencing shall comply with all the provisions of Section 21.18.060 of the Campbell Municipal Code. The design and location of all fences shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of any building permits for the project. Fencing along the property lines shall be replaced at the expense of the applicant, unless it is determined to be in good condition by the Community Development Director. 8. Propertv Maintenance: The property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris, and weeds until the time that actual construction commences. Any vacant existing structures shall be secured, by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed from the property (Section 11.201 and 11.414, 1985 Ed. Uniform Fire Code). 9. On-Site Liohtino: Any proposed on-site lighting shall be shielded away from adjacent properties and directed on site. The design, type, lighting intensity, and location of any exterior lighting fixtures shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of a building permit for such lighting. Lighting fixtures shall be of a decorative design to be compatible with the development and shall incorporate energy saving features. 10. Parkino and Driveways: All parking and driveway areas shall be developed in compliance with the approved plans and Chapter 21.28 (Parking and Loading) of the Campbell Municipal Code. The applicant shall provide a decorative paving treatment within the walkways and driveways for the homes. The design and materials used for the decorative pavement shall be indicated on the building permit plans and shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Developm.ent Director prior to the issuance of building permits. 11. Contractor Contact Information Postino: The project site shall be posted with the name and contact number of the lead contractor in a location visible from the public street prior to the issuance of building permits. 12. Utilities: All new on-site utilities shall be installed underground per section 21.18.140 (Undergrounding of Utilities) of the Campbell Municipal Code. Planning Commission Rt;. Jlution No. 3689 PLN2004-111 -1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Recommending Approval of a Planned Development Permit Page 5 13. Roof Vents: The applicant shall coordinate mechanical and plumbing plans to minimize the number of roof vents that are visible from the street frontage. The applicant shall provide the location of such vents on the building plan elevations and roof plans, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, prior to issuance of building permits. 14. Construction Hours: Construction activities shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Saturdays. Construction is prohibited on Sundays and City Holidays unless an exception is granted by the Building Official. Building Division: 15. Permits Required: A building permit application shall be required for each new detached dwelling. The building permit shall include Electrical/Plumbing/Mechanical fees when such work is part of the permit. 16. Plan Preparation: This project requires plans prepared under the direction and oversight of a California licensed Engineer or Architect. Plans submitted for building permits shall be "wet stamped" and signed by the qualifying professional person. 17. Construction Plans: The conditions of approval shall be stated in full on the cover sheet of construction plans submitted for building permit. 18. Size of Plans: The size of construction plans submitted for building permits shall be 24 inches by 36 inches. 19. Soils Report: Two copies of a current soils report, prepared to the satisfaction of the Building Official, containing foundation and retaining wall design recommendations shall be submitted with the building permit application. This report shall be prepared by a licensed engineer specializing in soils mechanics. 20. Site Plan: Application for building permit shall include a competent site plan that identifies property and proposed structures with dimensions and elevations as appropriate. Site plan shall also include site drainage details. 21. Foundation Inspections: A pad certificate prepared by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor shall be submitted to the project building inspector upon foundation inspection. This certificate shall certify compliance with the recommendations as specified in the soils report and the building pad elevation and on-site retaining wall locations and elevations are prepared according to approved plans. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer for the following items: a. pad elevation Planning Commission RE:.Aution No. 3689 PLN2004-111 -1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Recommending Approval of a Planned Development Permit Page 6 b. finish floor elevation (first floor) c. foundation corner locations 22. Title 24 Enerav Compliance: California Title 24 Energy Compliance forms CF-1 R and MF-1 R shall be blue-lined on the construction plans. 8% X 11 calculations shall be submitted to the Building Division. 23. Special Inspections: When a special inspection is required by U.B.C. Section 1701, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be submitted to the Building Official for approval prior to issuance of the building permits, in accordance with U.B.C Section 106.3.5. Please obtain City of Campbell, Special Inspection forms from the Building Inspection Division Counter. 24. Non-Point Source Pollution Control: The City of Campbell standard Santa Clara Valley Non-point Source Pollution Control Program specification sheet shall be part of plan submittal. The specification sheet (size 24" X 36") is available at the Building Division service counter. 25. P.G.&E.: The applicant is advised to contact P.G.&E. as early as possible in the approval process. Service installations, changes and/or relocations may require substantial scheduling time and can cause significant delays in the approval process. The applicant should also consult with P.G.&E. concerning utility easements, distribution pole locations and required conductor clearances. 26. Construction FencinQ: This project shall be properly enclosed with construction fencing to prevent unauthorized access to the site during construction. The construction site shall be secured to prevent vandalism and/or theft during hours when no work is being done. All protected trees shall be fenced to prevent damage to root systems. 27. Approvals Reauired: The project requires the following agency approval prior to issuance of the building permit: a. West Valley Sanitation District (378-2407) b. Santa Clara County Fire Department (378-4010) c. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (Demolitions Only) d. School District: i. Campbell Union School District (378-3405) ii. Campbell Union High School District (371-0960) iii. Moreland School District (379-1370) iv. Cambrian School District (377-2103) Note: To determine your district, contact the offices identified above. Obtain the School District payment form from the City Building Division, after the Division has approved the building permit application. Planning Commission Rt:._Jlution No. 3689 PLN2004-111 - 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Recommending Approval of a Planned Development Permit Page 7 FIRE DEPARTMENT 28. Formal Plan Review: Review of this development proposal is limited to accessibility of site access and water supply as they pertain to fire department operations, and shall not be construed as a substitute for formal plan review to determine compliance with adopted model codes. Prior to performing any work the applicant shall make application to, and receive from, the Building Division all applicable construction permits. 29. Required Fire Flow: The required fire flow for this project is 1,750 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure. The required fire flow is available from area water mains and fire hydrant(s), which are located at the required spacing. 30. Fire Apparatus (Enoine) Access Drivewav Reauired: Provide an access driveway with a paved all weather surface, a minimum unobstructed width of 12-feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet, six inches. Installations shall conform to Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications Sheet 0-1 . 31. Premises Identification: Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall contrast with their background. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 32. Parcel Map: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the project, the applicant shall submit a parcel map for recordation upon approval by the City, pay various fees/deposits and submit the map in a digital format acceptable to the City. 33. Preliminary Title Report: Upon submittal of the parcel map, the applicant shall provide a current (within the past 6 months) Preliminary Title Report. 34. Monumentation for Parcel Map: Prior to recordation of the parcel map, the applicant shall provide a cash deposit for setting all monuments shown on the map. Monuments shall be set per section 20.76.010 of the Campbell Municipal Code. 35. Occupancy: Prior to allowing occupancy for any and/or all buildings, the applicant shall have the required street improvements installed and accepted by the City, and the design engineer shall submit as-built drawings to the City. 36. Maintenance of Landscapino: Owner(s), current and future, are required to maintain the landscaped park strip and tree wells in the public right of way. This includes, but is not limited to: trees, lawn, plantings, irrigation, etc. Trees shall not be pruned in a manner that would not allow the tree to grow to a mature height. Planning Commission Rl._0Iution No. 3689 PLN2004-111 - 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Recommending Approval of a Planned Development Permit Page 8 37. Water Meter(s) and Sewer Cleanout(s): Existing and proposed water meter(s) and sewer cleanout(s) shall be relocated or installed on private property behind the public right-of-way line. 38. Soils Report: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, applicant shall provide a soils report prepared by a registered geotechnical or civil engineer. 39. Utilities: All on-site utilities shall be installed underground per Section 21.18.140 of the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings or additions. Applicant shall comply with all plan submittals, permitting, and fee requirements of the serving utility companies. 40. Utilitv Coordination Plan: Prior to issuance of building permits for the site, the applicant shall submit a utility coordination plan and schedule for approval by the City Engineer for installation and/or abandonment of all utilities. The plan shall clearly show the location and size of all existing utilities and the associated main lines; indicate which utilities and services are to remain; which utilities and services are to be abandoned, and where new utilities and services will be installed. Joint trenches for new utilities shall be used whenever possible. 41. Pavement Restoration: Based on the utility coordination plan, the applicant shall prepare a pavement restoration plan for approval by the City Engineer prior to any utility installation or abandonment. Streets that have been reconstructed or overlaid within the previous five years will require boring and jacking for all new utility installations. West Hacienda Avenue has not been reconstructed or overlaid in the last 5 years. The pavement restoration plan shall indicate how the street pavement shall be restored following the installation or abandonment of all utilities necessary for the project. 42. Gradino and Drainaoe Plan: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall conduct hydrology studies based on a ten-year storm frequency, prepare an engineered grading and drainage plan, and pay fees required to obtain necessary grading permits. The plans shall comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code including Chapters 10, 11, 18, 33, and Appendix Chapter 33. 43. Storm Drain Area Fee: Prior to recordation of the parcel map, the applicant shall pay the most current Storm Drain Area fee, currently set at $2,120.00 per net acre, which is $954.00. 44. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Measures: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements, Santa Clara Valley Water District Planning Commission Rt:._.Jlution No. 3689 PLN2004-111 -1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Recommending Approval of a Planned Development Permit Page 9 requirements, and the Campbell Municipal Code regarding stormwater pollution prevention. The primary objectives are to improve the quality and reduce the quantity of stormwater runoff to the bay. Resources to achieve these objectives include Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbook for New Development and Redevelopment rCA BMP Handbook") by the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA), 2003; Start at the Source: A Design Guidance Manual for Stormwater Quality Protection ("Start at the Source") by the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA), 1999; and Using Site Design Techniques to Meet Development Standards for Stormwater Quality: A Companion Document to Start at the Source ("Using Site Design Techniques") by BASMAA, 2003. 45. Demolition: Prior to recording of the parcel map the applicant shall obtain a demolition permit and remove any nonconforming structures. 46. Street Improvements: . Prior to recordation of the parcel map, the applicant shall execute a street improvement agreement, cause plans for public street improvements to be prepared by a registered civil engineer, pay various fees and deposits, post security and provide insurance necessary to obtain an encroachment permit for construction of the standard public street improvements, as required by the City Engineer. The plans shall include the following: a. Show location of all existing utilities within the new and existing public right of way. b. Relocation of all existing utilities including utility boxes, covers, poles, etc. outside of sidewalk area. No utility boxes, covers, etc. will be allowed in the sidewalk area. c. Removal of existing pavement structural street section to centerline. d. Installation of City approved street trees at 30 feet on center and landscaping turf. e. Installation of City standard curb, gutter, sidewalk and ADA compliant driveway approaches. f. Installation of new engineered pavement structural section to centerline, as required by the City Engineer. g. Installation of asphalt concrete overlay per street pavement restoration plan for utility installation and/or abandonment, as required by the City Engineer. h. Installation of streetlights, conduits, conductors and related facilities in accordance with the City of Campbell's Street Lighting Policies. 1. Installation of traffic control, stripes and signs. Planning Commission Resolution No. 3689 PLN2004-111 -1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Recommending Approval of a Planned Development Permit Page 10 J. Construction of conforms to existing public and private improvements, as necessary. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of October, 2005, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Alderete, Doorley, Ebner, Francois. Gibbons, Rocha and Roseberry None None None Commissioners: Commissioners: Commissioners: APPROVED: ATTEST: ~ y~ ./' Sharon Fierro, Secretary RESOLUTION NO. 3690 BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (PLN2005-65) TO REMOVE SIX PROTECTED TREES (FIVE INCENSE CEDARS AND ONE ACACIA) ON PROPERTY OWNED BY MR. JACK BATES LOCATED AT 1819 W. HACIENDA AVENUE IN A P-D (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT) ZONING DISTRICT. APPLICATION OF MR. HAMID ADLPARV AR, ON BEHALF OF MR. JACK BATES. FILE NO: PLN2005-65. After notification and public hearing as specified by law and after presentation by the Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed. After due consideration of all evidence presented, the Planning Commission did find as follows with respect to application PLN2005-65. 1. The proposed Tree Removal Permit is consistent with the Low-Medium Density Residential (6-13 units per gross acre) General Plan Land Use Designation and the P-D (Planned Development) Zoning District. 2. The project will include the removal of six protected trees (five Incense Cedars and one Acacia) because they would prohibit the construction of the driveways for the two new single-family homes. 3. The six 24-inch box replacement trees that are indicated on the landscape plan are consistent with the tree replacement requirements of the Tree Protection Regulations. 4. The proposed replacement trees will be a sufficient replacement for the trees to be removed and will continue the diversity of tree species found in the community. 5. A certified arborist prepared an arborist report for the project and identified all six trees as unhealthy and recommended that they be removed. Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further finds and concludes that: 1. The retention of the trees restricts the economic enjoyment of the property and creates an unusual hardship for the property owner by severely limiting the use of the property in a manner not typically experienced by owners of similarly zoned and situated properties, and the applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission that there are no reasonable alternatives to preserve the trees. 2. The trees are irreparably diseased and cannot be remedied through reasonable preservation and/or preventative procedures and practices such that the public health and safety requires their removal. ...... Planning Commission Resc.._.ion No. 3690 PLN2005-65 -1819 W. Hacienda -Tree Removal Permit Page 2 3. No substantial evidence has been presented from which a reasonable argument could be made that shows that the project, as currently presented and subject to the required conditions of approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment. 4. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the conditions of approval and the impacts of the project NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends approval of a Tree Removal Permit (PLN2005-65) to allow the removal of six protected trees (five Incense Cedars and one Acacia) on property owned by Mr. Jack Bates located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue in a P-D (Planned Development) Zoning District. Where approval by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, Public Works Director, City Attorney or Fire Department is required, that review shall be for compliance with all applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines, ordinances, laws and regulations and accepted engineering practices for the item under review. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this development and are not herein specified. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division: 1. Approved Proiect: Approval is granted for a Tree Removal Permit to remove six protected trees (five Incense Cedars and one Acacia) on property located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue. The Tree Removal Permit shall only be valid in conjunction with an approved Planned Development Permit (PLN2004-111 ). 2. Replacement of Removed Trees: The applicant shall provide six 24-inch box replacement trees for the protected trees to be removed as part of the development. 3. Landscape and Irriqation Plan: The applicant shall submit a final landscape and irrigation plan to the Planning Division for review and approval, prior to the issuance of building permits. The landscape and irrigation plan shall substantially conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping Standards (WELS) and shall include all replacement trees as required for the Tree Removal Permit. 4. Tree Protection Plan: The applicant shall submit a tree protection plan for all protected trees to be retained on site or on adjacent lots that are impacted by the project, and shall contain specific information about the preservation of the trees during any grading or building on site. Such tree protection measures shall be installed prior to any demolition, grading, or building on the project site. No construction or trenching shall take place within the drip line of trees and a fence constructed of temporary cyclone fencing or wire mesh securely attached to poles driven into the ground shall be installed around the dripline of the tree. All trimming or branch removal from protected trees shall be completed by a certified arborist. The tree protection plan shall be submitted to the Planning Commission Resolution No. 3690 PLN2005-65 -1819 W. Hacienda -Tree Removal Permit Page 3 Planning Division for review and approval by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of October, 2005, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Alderete, Doorley, Roseberry None None None Ebner, Francois, Gibbons, Rocha and NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Commissioners: Commissioners: Commissioners: ,jJ-;{,~ ATTEST: ~ y ~ /' Sharon Fierro, Secretary Planning Commission IV ,tes of October 25, 2005 Page 15 . To require PizzaMyHeart to submit a Sign Application for the Community Development Director's approval within the existing Master Sign Plan criteria as a minor tenant sign; and . Approving a total of two wall signs for Bankers Network with the conditioned removal of two existing flag signs; by the following roll call vote: AYES: Alderete, Ooorley, Ebner, Fran~ois, Gibbons, Rocha and Roseberry None None None NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Chair Gibbons advised that this action is final unless appealed in writing to the City Clerk within 10 calendar days. *** Chair Gibbons read Agenda Item NO.3 into the record as follows: 3 PLN2004.109 (ZC) PLN2004.110 (PM) PLN2004.111 (PO) PLN2005-65 (TRP) Adlparvar, H. Public hearing to consider the application of Mr. Hamid Adlparvar, on behalf of Mr. Jack Bates, for approval of the following applications: . Zone Change (PLN2004-109) from R-1-9 to P-D; . Tentative Parcel Map (PLN2004-110) for a two-lot subdivision; . Planned Development Permit (PLN2004-111) to allow the construction of two new single-family homes; and . Tree Removal Permit (PLN2005-65) to remove six protected trees (five Incense Cedars and one Acacia); on property owned by Mr. Jack Bates located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue in an R-1-9 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District. Staff is recommending that this project be deemed Categorically Exempt under CEQA. Tentative City Council Meeting Date: November 15, 2005. Project Planner: Stephanie Willsey, Planner I Ms. Stephanie Willsey, Planner I, presented the staff report as follows: · Reported that the applicant is seeking to develop property on the north side of W. Hacienda Avenue, between Harriet Avenue and Del Loma Drive. · Described the surrounding uses as being town homes to the east and south and single-family residences to the north and west. The property is at the San Jose border. · Stated that the General Plan Land Use is Low to Medium Density Residential that allows 6 to 13 units per gross acre. The proposed development is at 4 units per gross acre. Planning Commission tv Jtes of October 25, 2005 Page 16 . Said that the Zoning is R-1-9. · Explained that the General Plan designation allows for a higher density than the R- 1-9 Zoning. Therefore, a Zoning Classification Change is proposed to P-D (Planned Development) to bring the Zoning and General Plan designations into consistency. · Advised that this parcel falls under the jurisdiction of the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan. · Stated that the applicant is seeking a Tentative Parcel Map to split one lot into two with one fronting the street and the second a flag lot. · Said that parking required is four spaces per parcel, with two covered and two uncovered. Staff finds this parking to be sufficient. · Explained that six trees would be removed under a proposed Tree Removal Permit. They have been ranked as unhealthy by an arborist and are located in the proposed driveway area. · Recommended that the Planning Commission adopt resolutions to forward recommendations for Council approval of the Zone Change, Tentative Parcel Map, Planned Development Permit and Tree Removal Permit for this property. Commissioner Roseberry asked for further clarification on the need to change to P-D zoning. Planner Stephanie replied to achieve conformance with the General Plan designation that currently offers higher density than the current Zoning. Chair Gibbons pointed out that the current General Plan designation would allow apartments on this property. Commissioner Alderete presented the Site and Architectural Review Committee report as follows: · Reported that SARC reviewed this project at its meeting of October 11 th and was supportive as presented with no changes in Conditions. Chair Gibbons opened the Public Hearing for Agenda Item NO.3. Chair Gibbons closed the Public Hearing for Agenda Item No.3. Commissioner Alderete: · Pointed out that this applicant sat through the SARC meeting for the same Sign Application as was heard earlier this evening. · Advised that he was in the Nation's Capitol and that Washington has nothing on us as far as debate. · Thanked the applicant for his patience with the process. Planning Commission 1\ Jtes of October 25, 2005 Page 17 Commissioner Rocha quipped that the applicant received more time this evening than he did at the SARC meeting since the previous application ate up most of the time available. Chair Gibbons pointed out that no neighbor concerns were raised. Commissioner Alderete pointed out that again there are no representatives from the San Tomas Neighborhood Association. He said it is most helpful when they are present. Motion: Upon motion of Commissioner Doorley, seconded by Commissioner Rocha, the Planning Commission took the following action: . Adopted Resolution No. 3687 recommending approval of a Zone Change (PLN2004-109) from R-1-9 to P-D; Adopted Resolution No. 3688 recommending approval of a Tentative Parcel Map (PLN2004-110) for a two-lot subdivision; . Adopted Resolution No. 3689 recommending approval of a Planned Development Permit (PLN2004-111) to allow the construction of two new single family homes; and . Adopted Resolution No. 3690 recommending approval of a Tree Removal Permit (PLN2005-65) to remove six protected trees (five Incense Cedars and one Acacia); on property located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Alderete, Doorley, Ebner, Fran~ois, Gibbons, Rocha and Roseberry None None None . NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Chair Gibbons advised that this item would be considered by Council for final action at its meeting of November 15, 2005. *** 4. Cancellation of the Planning Commission meeting of November 8, 2005. Motion: Upon motion and second, the Planning Commission cancelled the regular Planning Commission meeting of November 8,2005. (7-0) *** .-... ---~. .. ~~.Of,; 'CA4tp~ ~ ~ U r- a a ... ... 1-.. :: .0 ,t. ~CH..."Q ITEM NO.3 CITY OF CAMPBELL · PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report. October 2S, 200S PLN2004-109 (ZC) PLN2004-110 (PM) PLN2004-111 (PD) PLN200S-6S (TRP) Public hearing to consider the application of Mr. Hamid Adlparvar, on behalf of Mr. Jack Bates, for approval of a Zone Change (PLN2004-109) from R-1-9 (Single-Family Residential) to P-D (Planned Development); a Tentative Parcel Map (PLN2004-110) for a two-lot subdivision; a Planned Development Permit (PLN2004-11I ) to allow the construction of two new single-family homes; and a Tree Removal Permit (PLN2005- 65) to remove six protected trees (five Incense Cedars and one Acacia) on property owned by Mr. Jack Bates located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue in the R-1-9 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District. Adlparvar, H. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the Planning Commission take the following actions: 1. Adopt a Resolution incorporating the attached findings, recommending that the City Council approve a Zone Change from R-1-9 (Single-Family Residential) to P-D (Planned Development). 2. Adopt a Resolution incorporating the attached findings, recommending that the City Council approve a Tentative Parcel Map for a two-lot subdivision, subject to the attached conditions of approval. 3. Adopt a Resolution incorporating the attached findings, recommending that the City Council approve a Planned Development Permit to allow the construction of two new single- family homes, subject to the attached conditions of approval. 4. Adopt a Resolution incorporating the attached findings, recommending that the City Council approve a Tree Removal Permit to remove six protected trees (five Incense Cedars and one Acacia), subject to the attached conditions of approval. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find that this project is Categorically Exempt under Section 15303, Class 3 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pertaining to the construction of two new single-family residences; and Section 15315, Class 15, of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pertaining to the division of property in urbanized areas into four or fewer parcels. -, Staff Report - Planning Commission Meeting of October 25,2005 PLN2004-1 09/11 0/111 & PLN2005-65 - 1819 West Hacienda Avenue Page 2 of5 PROJECT DATA N/A N/A N/A 6-13 units/ oss acre N/A N/A N/A 6-13 units/ oss acre DISCUSSION Applicant's Proposal: The applicant is requesting approval of a Zone Change from R-1-9 (Single- Family Residential) to P-D (planned Development), a Tentative Parcel Map for a two-lot subdivision, a Planned Development Permit for the construction of two single-family homes, and a Tree Removal Permit for the removal of six protected trees (five Incense Cedars and one Acacia) on property located at 1819 West Hacienda Avenue. Background: The subject property was previously developed with a single-family home and garage which were abandoned. The structures were demolished in 2004. --., Staff Report - Planning Commission Meeting of October 25,2005 PLN2004-1 09/11 0/111 & PLN2005-65 - 1819 West Hacienda Avenue Page 3 of5 Property Description: The project site is located on the north side of West Hacienda Avenue between Harriet Avenue and Del Lorna Drive. The subject property is located on the San Jose/Campbell city border and is surrounded by townhomes to the east and south and single-family homes to the north and west. The townhomes to the south and single-family homes to the west are in the City of San Jose. ANALYSIS General Plan Designation: The General Plan land use designation for the project site is Low- Medium Density Residential (6-13 units per gross acre). The proposed development of two single- family homes would result in a density of four units per gross acre, which is well below the allowable density under the General Plan. Based on a density calculation alone, six units could be accommodated on the property within the allowable density range of the General Plan. The proposed project complies with the following General Plan Land Use Element Strategies: Strategy LUT -5.2a: Neighborhood Compatibilitv: Promote new residential development and substantial additions that are designed to maintain and support the existing character and development pattern of the surrounding neighborhood, especially in historic neighborhoods and neighborhoods with consistent design characteristics. Strategy LUT-7.2n: Consistency With Plans: Ensure that new development and substantial remodeling projects are consistent with Specific Plans, Area Plans, City Standard Details, and adopted Streetscape Standards to create a cohesive design. Strategv LUT-9.3e: Building Materials: Encourage the use oflong-Iasting, high quality building materials on all buildings to ensure the long-term quality of the built environment. Strategv LUT -17.1 b: Landscaping: Ensure that new developments provide new tree plantings, shrubs, greenery and other landscaping materials, and preserve existing trees and shrubs. San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan: The project site is located in the San Tomas Neighborhood and is subject to the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan (ST ANP). ST ANP requires that the minimum lot size for low density residential P-D projects be at least equal to the predominant minimum lot size requirement of parcels contiguous to, or directly across a public right-of-way from the subject site. In situations where no minimum lot size requirement is predominant, the Planning Commission and City Council shall determine the appropriate minimum lot size based on land use factors specific to the subject site. There is no predominant lot size surrounding the subject property. The property to the north is zoned R-1-9 and is developed with a single-family home. The properties to the west are located in San Jose and area zoned R-I-8 (which is a residential zoning at a density of eight dwelling units per acre, which results in a minimum lot size of 5,445 square feet) and are developed with single-family homes. The property to the south is located in San Jose and is zoned A(PD) with a Staff Report - Planning Commission Meeting of October 25,2005 PLN2004-109/110/111 & PLN2005-65 -1819 West Hacienda Avenue Page 4 of5 maximum density of eight dwelling units per acre and is developed with an eight-unit townhome development. The property to the east is zoned P-D and is developed with an II-unit townhome development. Based on the surrounding zoning and developments, staff is recommending that the minimum lot size for this development be 8,000 square feet. Both of the proposed lots exceed 8,000 square feet. Both proposed homes also meet the development standards of the R-l- 8 Zoning District in terms of setbacks, height restriction, building coverage, and floor area ratio. Zoning Designation: The current zoning classification for the project site is R-I-9 (Single-Family Residential) and the General Plan Designation is Low-Medium Density (6-13 units per gross acre). The zoning designation and General Plan designation are currently inconsistent with each other because the General Plan designation allows a higher density than is allowed under the R-1-9 zoning designation. The corresponding zoning classification for the current General Plan designation is R-M (Multiple-Family Residential) or P-D. The proposed zoning classification change to P-D would bring the zoning classification and General Plan designation into conformance with each other. Subdivision Design: The applicant is requesting approval of a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide the property into two residential lots. The proposed lot configuration would result in a lot fronting along West Hacienda Avenue and a rear flag lot with a 15- foot wide flag pole. The street access (flag pole) for the rear flag lot is proposed along the eastern side of the property. The proposed front lot (Lot A) is 8,998 square feet and is 65 feet wide. The proposed rear flag lot (Lot B) is 8,309 square feet exclusive of the required 15-foot wide access driveway and 10,385 square feet with the access driveway. The proposed lot width for Lot B is 80 feet. Street Improvements: The ST ANP requires that standard street improvements be installed as part of the project including curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and lighting. Site Lavout & Architecture: The site plan proposes the construction of two single-family homes, one on each proposed lot. The proposed home on Lot A is a single story home with an attached two-car garage. The proposed residence has a traditional design with well-articulated architectural features. The elevations incorporate representative architectural features of the San Tomas Neighborhood including simple rectangular shaped forms, simple hipped and gabled rooflines, tile roof, and a shingle siding exterior. The proposed colors for the house consist of a mahogany color stain for the shingle siding and a burgundy trim. The proposed roof material is a tan colored tile shingle. The proposed home on Lot B is a two-story home with an attached two-car garage. The proposed home is situated on the lot so that the front of the home faces West Hacienda Avenue with the garage on the eastern side of the home so that it is easily accessible from the driveway. This home also has a traditional design with well-articulated architectural features including a defined entry porch, shutters, decorative garage door, and a horizontal siding exterior. The proposed colors for the house consist of a cedar color stain for the shingle siding and a forest green trim. The proposed roof material is a tan colored tile shingle. LandscaoingfTrees: The proposed development includes a Tree Removal Permit application for the removal of six protected trees (five Incense Cedar trees and one Acacia tree). The trees Staff Report - Planning Commission Meeting of October 25,2005 PLN2004-109/11O/111 & PLN2005-65 - 1819 West Hacienda Avenue Page 5 of5 proposed to be removed are located within the driveway of the home on Lot A and the driveway for the home on Lot B. A certified arborist prepared an arborist report for the project and identified all six trees as unhealthy and recommended that they be removed. The arborist report states that the five Incense Cedars suffer from a canker disease and the Acacia tree is suffering from a fungal disease. The preliminary landscape plan shows the location for the six required 24-inch box replacement trees as well as many other trees and landscaping for the project. Staff has added and condition of approval that requires the applicant to use a decorative paving treatment within the walkways and driveways for both the homes. Parking: The STANP requires that low-density residential P-D projects provide shared guest parking spaces totaling two spaces per unit in addition to the parking requirement for a single- family home, which is one covered and one uncovered parking space. The spaces located in the driveways of the units shall not be counted as guest parking spaces. Therefore, each proposed home is required to provide four spaces per unit, one of which must be covered, and does not include the driveway spaces. However, the site plan provides four spaces per home, two covered spaces in the garages and two uncovered in the driveway. The City Council can approve any exception to the policies of the ST ANP. Staff believes that the proposed four off-street parking spaces for each home is adequate to meet the demands of the future tenants. The two required guest parking spaces are intended for larger low-density residential developments where there is limited public street parking available for new units and a private local access street does not provide off-street parking due to driveway access and fire department roadway parking constraints. Site and Architectural Review Committee: The Site and Architectural Review Committee (SARC) reviewed this application at its meeting of October 11, 2005. SARC was supportive of the project as presented and had no recommended changes or conditions of approval. Attachments: I. Findings for Approval of File No. PLN2004-109 (Zone Change) 2. Findings for Approval of File No. PLN2004-11 0 (Tentative Parcel Map) 3. Findings for Approval of File No. PLN2004-111 (Planned Development Permit) 4. Findings for Approval for File No. PLN2005-65 (Tree Removal Permit) 5. Conditions of Approval for File No. PLN2004-11O (Tentative Parcel Map) 6. Conditions of Approval for File No. PLN2004-111 (Planned Development Permit) 7. Conditions of Approval for File No. PLN2005-65 (Tree Removal Permit) 8. Tentative Parcel Map & Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan 9. Project Plans (Site Plan, Floor Plans, Elevations, Roof Plans, Landscape Plan) 10. Arborist Report II. Location Map Prepared by: ~.~ \D\\l~ Stephanie Willsey, Planner I Approved by: Attachment # 1 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF FILE NO PLN2004-109 (ZONE CHANGE) SITE ADDRESS: APPLICANT: P.C. MEETING: 1819 West Hacienda Avenue Mr. Hamid Adlparvar October 25,2005 Findings recommending that the City Council approve a Zone Change from R-I-9 (Single- Family Residential) to P-D (Planned Development) on property located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue. The Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to File No. PLN2004-109: 1. The proposed P-D zoning designation is consistent with the current Low-Medium Density Residential (6-13 units per gross acre) General Plan land use designation for the property. 2. The proposed density of four units per gross acre is within the allowed density range of6-13 units per gross acre permitted in the Low-Medium Density Residential General Plan land use designation. 3. The zoning designation and General Plan designation are currently inconsistent with each other because the General Plan designation allows a higher density than is allowed under the R-I-9 zoning designation. The corresponding zoning classification for the current General Plan designation is R-M (Multiple-Family Residential) or P-D. 4. The proposed zoning classification change to P-D would bring the zoning classification and General Plan designation into conformance with each other. Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further finds and concludes that: 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, policies, and actions of the General Plan. 2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or general welfare of the City. 3. The parcel is physically suitable (including absence of physical constraints, access, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and provision of utilities) for the requested zoning designation and anticipated land uses/project. 4. The proposed zoning designation will not result in allowing more residential units than would be allowed by other residential zoning districts which are consistent with the General Plan land use designation ofthe property. 5. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the conditions of approval and the impacts ofthe project. 6. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fees imposed upon the project and the type of development project. Attachment # 1 Page 2 of2 7. No substantial evidence has been presented from which a reasonable argument could be made that shows that the project, as currently presented and subject to the required conditions of approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment. Attachment #2 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF FILE NO PLN2004-110 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP) SITE ADDRESS: APPLICANT: P.C. MEETING: 1819 West Hacienda Avenue Mr. Hamid Adlparvar October 25,2005 Findings recommending that the City Council approve a Tentative Parcel Map for a two-lot subdivision on property located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue. The Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to File No. PLN2004-11 0: 1. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map will result in a density of four units per gross acre, which is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Low-Medium Density Residential (6-13 units per gross acre). 2. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the P-D (planned Development) Zoning District and the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan. 3. The proposed subdivision layout allows access to natural air and light. 4. Each new lot created has adequate access to a public right-of-way. 5. The proposed front lot (Lot A) is 8,998 square feet and is 65 feet wide. 6. The proposed rear flag lot (Lot B) is 8,309 square feet exclusive of the required 15-foot wide access driveway and 10,385 square feet with the access driveway. The proposed lot width for Lot B is 80 feet. 7. The Tentative Parcel Map has been distributed to local agencies, including Pacific Gas and Electric, West Valley Sanitation District, Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority, and the Santa Clara Valley Water District. None of these agencies raised any concerns about providing services to the lots. 8. The project qualifies as a Categorically Exempt project per Section 15315, Class 15 (Minor Land Divisions) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further finds and concludes that: 1. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. 2. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map does not impair the balance between the housing needs of the region and the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources. 3. The design of the Tentative Parcel Map provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities. Attachment #2 Page 2 of2 4. The proposed development will aid in the harmonious development of the immediate area. 5. No substantial evidence has been presented from which a reasonable argument could be made that shows that the project, as currently presented and subject to the required conditions of approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment. 6. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the conditions of approval and the impacts ofthe project. 7. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fees imposed upon the project and the type of development project. Attachment #3 FINDINGS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF FILE NO PLN2004-111 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT) SITE ADDRESS: APPLlCANT: P.C. MEETING: 1819 West Hacienda Avenue Mr. Hamid Adlparvar October 25, 2005 Findings recommending that the City Council approve a Planned Development Permit to allow the construction of two new single-family homes on property located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue. The Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to File No. PLN2004-111: 1. The density of the proposed project site is four units per gross acre, which is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Low-Medium Density Residential (6-13 units per gross acre). 2. The proposed project is consistent with the Planned Development Zoning Ordinance. 3. The project site is located on the north side of West Hacienda Avenue between Harriet Avenue and Del Lorna Drive. 4. The subject property is located on the San Jose/Campbell city border and is surrounded by townhomes to the east and south and single-family homes to the north and west. The townhomes to the south and single-family homes to the west are in the City of San Jose. 5. The site plan proposes the construction of two single-family homes, one on each proposed lot. 6. The proposed home on Lot A is a single-story home with an attached two-car garage and the proposed home on Lot B is a two-story home with an attached two-car garage. 7. Both homes have a traditional design with well-articulated architectural features. The elevations incorporate representative architectural features of the San Tomas Neighborhood including simple rectangular shaped forms, simple hipped and gabled rooflines, and tile roof. 8. The project provides four spaces per home, two covered spaces in the garages and two uncovered in the driveways. The parking is adequate to meet the needs of the proposed development. 9. Standard street improvements will be installed as part of the project including curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and lighting. 10. The project qualifies as a Categorically Exempt project per Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structure) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further finds and concludes that: Attachment #3 Page 2 of2 1. The proposed development will result in a more desirable environment and use of the land than would be possible under any other zoning classification. 2. The development will be compatible with the General Plan of the City and will aid in the hannonious development of the immediate area. 3. The proposed development will not result in allowing more residential units than would be allowed by other residential zoning districts, which are consistent with the General Plan designation of the property. 4. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the neighborhood or the City as a whole. 5. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the conditions of approval and the impacts ofthe project. 6. There is a reasonable relationship between the use of the fees imposed upon the project and the type of development project. 7. No substantial evidence has been presented from which a reasonable argument could be made that shows that the project, as currently presented and subject to the required conditions of approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment. Attachment #4 RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FOR PLN2005-65 (TREE REMOVAL PERMIT) SITE ADDRESS: APPLICANT: P.C. MEETING: 1819 West Hacienda Avenue Mr. Hamid Adlparvar October 25,2005 Findings recommending that the Citv Council aoorove a Tree Removal Permit for the removal of six protected trees (five Incense Cedars and one Acacia) in conjunction with a develooment project located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue. The Planning Commission finds as follows with regard to File No. PLN2005-65: 1. The proposed Tree Removal Permit is consistent with the Low-Medium Density Residential (6-13 units per gross acre) General Plan Land Use Designation and the P-D (planned Development) Zoning District. 2. The project will include the removal of six protected trees (five Incense Cedars and one Acacia) because they would prohibit the construction of the driveways for the two new single- family homes. 3. The six 24-inch box replacement trees that are indicated on the landscape plan are consistent with the tree replacement requirements ofthe Tree Protection Regulations. 4. The proposed replacement trees will be a sufficient replacement for the trees to be removed and will continue the diversity of tree species found in the community. 5. A certified arborist prepared an arborist report for the project and identified all six trees as unhealthy and recommended that they be removed. Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further finds and concludes that: 1. The retention of the trees restricts the economic enjoyment of the property and creates an unusual hardship for the property owner by severely limiting the use of the property in a manner not typically experienced by owners of similarly zoned and situated properties, and the applicant has demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Planning Commission that there are no reasonable alternatives to preserve the trees. 2. The trees are irreparably diseased and cannot be remedied through reasonable preservation and/or preventative procedures and practices such that the public health and safety requires their removal. 3. No substantial evidence has been presented from which a reasonable argument could be made that shows that the project, as currently presented and subject to the required conditions of approval, will have a significant adverse impact on the environment. 4. There is a reasonable relationship and a rough proportionality between the conditions of approval and the impacts ofthe project. -, Attachment #5 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR FILE NO. PLN2004-110 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP) SITE ADDRESS: APPLICANT: P.C. MEETING: 1819 West Hacienda Avenue Mr. Hamid Adlparvar October 25,2005 The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that (s)he is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California. The lead department with which the applicant will work is identified on each condition where necessary. Where approval by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, Public Works Director, City Attorney, or Fire Department is required, that review shall be for compliance with all applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines, ordinances, laws and regulations, and accepted engineering practices, for the items under review. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that (s)he is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this development and are not herein specified: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division: 1. Approved Proiect: Approval is granted for a Tentative Parcel Map for a two lot subdivision on property located at 1819 West Hacienda Avenue. The Tentative Parcel Map shall substantially conform to the Tentative Parcel Map prepared by SMP Company and stamped as received by the Planning Division on September 22,2005, except as may be modified by the conditions of approval herein. 2. Approval Expiration: The Tentative Parcel Map approval is valid for a period of two years from the date of final City Council approval, unless an extension is granted prior to the expiration date. 3. Park Impact Fee: A park impact fee, based on a density range ofless than six units per gross acre, is due upon development ofthe site. Credit shall be given for any existing single-family residence if the residence is demolished less than two years prior to the payment of the required park impact fee. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, 75% of this fee is due. The remaining 25% is due prior to issuance of a certificate of building occupancy. 4. Demolition of Structures: Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map the applicant shall obtain a demolition permit from the Building Division for the demolition of all non-conforming structures. 5. Recordation of Parcel Map: The Planned Development Permit approval is contingent upon recordation of the Parcel Map to divide the subject property. The Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. 6. Property Maintenance: The property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures Attachment #5 Page 2 of 4 shall be secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed from the property (Section 11.201 and 11.414, 1985 Ed. Uniform Fire Code). PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 7. Parcel Map: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the project, the applicant shall submit a parcel map for recordation upon approval by the City, pay various fees/deposits and submit the map in a digital format acceptable to the City. 8. Preliminary Title Report: Upon submittal of the parcel map, the applicant shall provide a current (within the past 6 months) Preliminary Title Report. 9. Monumentation for Parcel Map: Prior to recordation of the parcel map, the applicant shall provide a cash deposit for setting all monuments shown on the map. Monuments shall be set per section 20.76.010 ofthe Campbell Municipal Code. 10. Occupancv: Prior to allowing occupancy for any and/or all buildings, the applicant shall have the required street improvements installed and accepted by the City, and the design engineer shall submit as-built drawings to the City. 11. Maintenance of Landscaping: Owner(s), current and future, are required to maintain the landscaped park strip and tree wells in the public right of way. This includes, but is not limited to: trees, lawn, plantings, irrigation, etc. Trees shall not be pruned in a manner that would not allow the tree to grow to a mature height. 12. Water Meter(s) and Sewer Cleanout(s): Existing and proposed water meter(s) and sewer cleanout(s) shall be relocated or installed on private property behind the public right-of-way line. 13. Soils Report: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, applicant shall provide a soils report prepared by a registered geotechnical or civil engineer. 14. Utilities: All on-site utilities shall be installed underground per Section 21.18.140 of the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings or additions. Applicant shall comply with all plan submittals, permitting, and fee requirements of the serving utility companIes. 15. Utility Coordination Plan: Prior to issuance of building permits for the site, the applicant shall submit a utility coordination plan and schedule for approval by the City Engineer for installation and/or abandonment of all utilities. The plan shall clearly show the location and size of all existing utilities and the associated main lines; indicate which utilities and services are to remain; which utilities and services are to be abandoned, and where new utilities and services will be installed. Joint trenches for new utilities shall be used whenever possible. 16. Pavement Restoration: Based on the utility coordination plan, the applicant shall prepare a pavement restoration plan for approval by the City Engineer prior to any utility installation or abandonment. Streets that have been reconstructed or overlaid within the previous five years will require boring and jacking for all new utility installations. West Hacienda Avenue has not been reconstructed or overlaid in the last 5 years. The pavement restoration plan shall -", Attachment #5 Page 3 of 4 indicate how the street pavement shall be restored following the installation or abandonment of all utilities necessary for the project. 17. Grading and Drainage Plan: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall conduct hydrology studies based on a ten-year storm frequency, prepare an engineered grading and drainage plan, and pay fees required to obtain necessary grading permits. The plans shall comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code including Chapters 10, 11, 18,33, and Appendix Chapter 33. 18. Storm Drain Area Fee: Prior to recordation of the parcel map, the applicant shall pay the most current Storm Drain Area fee, currently set at $2,120.00 per net acre, which is $954.00. 19. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Measures: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements, Santa Clara Valley Water District requirements, and the Campbell Municipal Code regarding stormwater pollution prevention. The primary objectives are to improve the quality and reduce the quantity of storm water runoff to the bay. Resources to achieve these objectives include Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbook for New Development and Redevelopment ("CA BMP Handbook") by the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA), 2003; Start at the Source: A Design Guidance Manual for Stormwater Quality Protection ("Start at the Source") by the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA), 1999; and Using Site Design Techniques to Meet Development Standards for Storm water Quality: A Companion Document to Start at the Source ("Using Site Design Techniques") by BASMAA, 2003. 20. Demolition: Prior to recording of the parcel map the applicant shall obtain a demolition permit and remove any nonconforming structures. 21. Street Improvements: Prior to recordation of the parcel map, the applicant shall execute a street improvement agreement, cause plans for public street improvements to be prepared by a registered civil engineer, pay various fees and deposits, post security and provide insurance necessary to obtain an encroachment permit for construction of the standard public street improvements, as required by the City Engineer. The plans shall include the following: a. Show location of all existing utilities within the new and existing public right of way. b. Relocation of all existing utilities including utility boxes, covers, poles, etc. outside of sidewalk area. No utility boxes, covers, etc. will be allowed in the sidewalk area. c. Removal of existing pavement structural street section to centerline. d. Installation of City approved street trees at 30 feet on center and landscaping turf. e. Installation of City standard curb, gutter, sidewalk and ADA compliant driveway approaches. f. Installation of new engineered pavement structural section to centerline, as required by the City Engineer. Attachment #5 Page 4 of4 g. Installation of asphalt concrete overlay per street pavement restoration plan for utility installation and/or abandonment, as required by the City Engineer. h. Installation of streetlights, conduits, conductors and related facilities in accordance with the City of Campbell's Street Lighting Policies. 1. Installation of traffic control, stripes and signs. J. Construction of conforms to existing public and private improvements, as necessary. Attachment #6 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR FILE NO. PLN2004-111 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT) SlTE ADDRESS: APPLICANT: P.C. MEETING: 1819 West Hacienda Avenue Mr. Hamid Adlparvar October 25,2005 The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that (s)he is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California. The lead department with which the applicant will work is identified on each condition where necessary. Where approval by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, Public Works Director, City Attorney, or Fire Department is required, that review shall be for compliance with all applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines, ordinances, laws and regulations, and accepted engineering practices, for the items under review. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that (s)he is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertain to this development and are not herein specified: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division: 1. Approved Proiect: Approval is granted for a Planned Development Permit to allow the construction of two new single-family homes located at 1819 West Hacienda Avenue. The building designs and site design shall substantially conform to the project exhibits listed below, except as may be modified by the conditions of approval herein: a. Project plans stamped as received by the Planning Division on September 22, 2005. b. Colored elevation and material board stamped as received by the Planning Division on September 22,2005. 2. Permit Expiration: The Planned Development Permit is valid for a period of two years from the date of final City Council approval. A building permit must be obtained within this two- year period or the Planned Development Permit shall be void. 3. Recordation of Parcel Map: The Planned Development Permit approval is contingent upon recordation of the Parcel Map to divide the subject property. The Parcel Map shall be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. Landscape and Irrigation Plan: The applicant shall submit a final landscape and irrigation plan to the Planning Division for review and approval, prior to the issuance of building permits. The landscape and irrigation plan shall substantially conform with the approved conceptual landscape plan and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping Standards (WELS) and shall include all replacement trees as required for the Tree Removal Permit. 5. Tree Protection Plan: The applicant shall submit a tree protection plan for all protected trees to be retained on site or on adjacent lots that are impacted by the project, and shall contain specific information about the preservation of the trees during any grading or building on Attachment #6 Page 2 of7 site. Such tree protection measures shall be installed prior to any demolition, grading, or building on the project site. No construction or trenching shall take place within the drip line of trees and a fence constructed of temporary cyclone fencing or wire mesh securely attached to poles driven into the ground shall be installed around the dripline of the tree. All trimming or branch removal from protected trees shall be completed by a certified arborist. The tree protection plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. 6. Park Impact Fee: A park impact fee, based on a density range of less. than six units per gross acre, is due upon development of the site. Credit shall be given for any existing single-family residence if the residence is demolished less than two years prior to the payment of the required fee. Prior to recordation of the Parcel Map, 75% of this fee is due. The remaining 25% is due prior to issuance of a certificate of building occupancy. 7. Fences: All new fencing shall comply with all the provisions of Section 21.18.060 of the Campbell Municipal Code. The design and location of all fences shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of any building permits for the project. Fencing along the property lines shall be replaced at the expense of the applicant, unless it is determined to be in good condition by the Community Development Director. 8. Prooertv Maintenance: The property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris, and weeds until the time that actual construction commences. Any vacant existing structures shall be secured, by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed from the property (Section 11.201 and 11.414, 1985 Ed. Uniform Fire Code). 9. On-Site Lighting: Any proposed on-site lighting shall be shielded away from adjacent properties and directed on site. The design, type, lighting intensity, and location of any exterior lighting fixtures shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior to issuance of a building permit for such lighting. Lighting fixtures shall be of a decorative design to be compatible with the development and shall incorporate energy saving features. 10. Parking and Drivewavs: All parking and driveway areas shall be developed in compliance with the approved plans and Chapter 21.28 (Parking and Loading) of the Campbell Municipal Code. The applicant shall provide a decorative paving treatment within the walkways and driveways for the homes. The design and materials used for the decorative pavement shall be indicated on the building permit plans and shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. 11. Contractor Contact Information Posting: The project site shall be posted with the name and contact number of the lead contractor in a location visible from the public street prior to the issuance of building permits. 12. Utilities: All new on-site utilities shall be installed underground per section 21.18.140 (Undergrounding of Utilities) of the Campbell Municipal Code. Attachment #6 Page 3 of7 13. Roof Vents: The applicant shall coordinate mechanical and plumbing plans to minimize the number of roof vents that are visible from the street frontage. The applicant shall provide the location of such vents on the building plan elevations and roof plans, to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director, prior to issuance of building permits. 14. Construction Hours: Construction activities shall be limited to the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. weekdays and 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Saturdays. Construction is prohibited on Sundays and City Holidays unless an exception is granted by the Building Official. Building Division: 15. Permits Reauired: A building permit application shall be required for each new detached dwelling. The building permit shall include ElectricallPlumbinglMechanical fees when such work is part of the permit. 16. Plan Preparation: This project requires plans prepared under the direction and oversight of a California licensed Engineer or Architect. Plans submitted for building permits shall be "wet stamped" and signed by the qualifying professional person. 17. Construction Plans: The conditions of approval shall be stated in full on the cover sheet of construction plans submitted for building permit. 18. Size of Plans: The size of construction plans submitted for building permits shall be 24 inches by 36 inches. 19. Soils Report: Two copies of a current soils report, prepared to the satisfaction of the Building Official, containing foundation and retaining wall design recommendations shall be submitted with the building permit application. This report shall be prepared by a licensed engineer specializing in soils mechanics. 20. Site Plan: Application for building permit shall include a competent site plan that identifies property and proposed structures with dimensions and elevations as appropriate. Site plan shall also include site drainage details. 21. Foundation Inspections: A pad certificate prepared by a licensed civil engineer or land surveyor shall be submitted to the project building inspector upon foundation inspection. This certificate shall certify compliance with the recommendations as specified in the soils report and the building pad elevation and on-site retaining wall locations and elevations are prepared according to approved plans. Horizontal and vertical controls shall be set and certified by a licensed surveyor or registered civil engineer for the following items: a. pad elevation b. finish floor elevation (first floor) c. foundation comer locations 22. Title 24 Energy Compliance: California Title 24 Energy Compliance forms CF-IR and MF- IR shall be blue-lined on the construction plans. 8Y2 X 11 calculations shall be submitted to the Building Division. Attachment #6 Page 4 of7 23. Special Inspections: When a special inspection is required by U.B.C. Section 1701, the architect or engineer of record shall prepare an inspection program that shall be submitted to the Building Official for approval prior to issuance of the building permits, in accordance with U.B.C Section 106.3.5. Please obtain City of Campbell, Special Inspection forms from the Building Inspection Division Counter. 24. Non-Point Source Pollution Control: The City of Campbell standard Santa Clara Valley Non- point Source Pollution Control Program specification sheet shall be part of plan submittal. The specification sheet (size 24" X 36") is available at the Building Division service counter. 25. P.G.&E.: The applicant is advised to contact P.G.&E. as early as possible in the approval process. Service installations, changes and/or relocations may require substantial scheduling time and can cause significant delays in the approval process. The applicant should also consult with P.G.&E. concerning utility easements, distribution pole locations and required conductor clearances. 26. Construction Fencing: This project shall be properly enclosed with construction fencing to prevent unauthorized access to the site during construction. The construction site shall be secured to prevent vandalism and/or theft during hours when no work is being done. All protected trees shall be fenced to prevent damage to root systems. 27. Approvals Required: The project requires the following agency approval prior to issuance of the building permit: a. West Valley Sanitation District (378-2407) b. Santa Clara County Fire Department (378-4010) c. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (Demolitions Only) d. School District: 1. Campbell Union School District (378-3405) 11. Campbell Union High School District (371-0960) lll. Moreland School District (379-1370) IV. Cambrian School District (377-2103) Note: To determine your district, contact the offices identified above. Obtain the School District payment form from the City Building Division, after the Division has approved the building permit application. FIRE DEPARTMENT 28. Formal Plan Review: Review of this development proposal is limited to accessibility of site access and water supply as they pertain to fire department operations, and shall not be construed as a substitute for formal plan review to determine compliance with adopted model codes. Prior to performing any work the applicant shall make application to, and receive from, the Building Division all applicable construction permits. 29. ReCiuired Fire Flow: The required fire flow for this project is 1,750 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure. The required fire flow is available from area water mains and fire hydrant(s), which are located at the required spacing. ,- Attachment #6 Page 5 of7 30. Fire Apparatus (Engine) Access Driveway Reauired: Provide an access driveway with a paved all weather surface, a minimum unobstructed width of 12-feet, vertical clearance of 13 feet, six inches. Installations shall conform to Fire Department Standard Details and Specifications Sheet D-l. 31. Premises ldentification: Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall contrast with their background. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 32. Parcel Map: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the project, the applicant shall submit a parcel map for recordation upon approval by the City, pay various fees/deposits and submit the map in a digital format acceptable to the City. 33. Preliminary Title Report: Upon submittal of the parcel map, the applicant shall provide a current (within the past 6 months) Preliminary Title Report. 34. Monumentation for Parcel Map: Prior to recordation of the parcel map, the applicant shall provide a cash deposit for setting all monuments shown on the map. Monuments shall be set per section 20.76.010 of the Campbell Municipal Code. 35. Occupancy: Prior to allowing occupancy for any and/or all buildings, the applicant shall have the required street improvements installed and accepted by the City, and the design engineer shall submit as-built drawings to the City. 36. Maintenance of Landscaping: Owner(s), current and future, are required to maintain the landscaped park strip and tree wells in the public right of way. This includes, but is not limited to: trees, lawn, plantings, irrigation, etc. Trees shall not be pruned in a manner that would not allow the tree to grow to a mature height. 37. Water Meter(s) and Sewer Cleanout(s): Existing and proposed water meter(s) and sewer cleanout(s) shall be relocated or installed on private property behind the public right-of-way line. 38. Soils Report: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, applicant shall provide a soils report prepared by a registered geotechnical or civil engineer. 39. Utilities: All on-site utilities shall be installed underground per Section 21.18.140 of the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings or additions. Applicant shall comply with all plan submittals, permitting, and fee requirements of the serving utility companIes. 40. Utility Coordination Plan: Prior to issuance of building permits for the site, the applicant shall submit a utility coordination plan and schedule for approval by the City Engineer for installation and/or abandonment of all utilities. The plan shall clearly show the location and size of all existing utilities and the associated main lines; indicate which utilities and services Attachment #6 Page 6 of7 are to remain; which utilities and services are to be abandoned, and where new utilities and services will be installed. Joint trenches for new utilities shall be used whenever possible. 41. Pavement Restoration: Based on the utility coordination plan, the applicant shall prepare a pavement restoration plan for approval by the City Engineer prior to any utility installation or abandonment. Streets that have been reconstructed or overlaid within the previous five years will require boring and jacking for all new utility installations. West Hacienda Avenue has not been reconstructed or overlaid in the last 5 years. The pavement restoration plan shall indicate how the street pavement shall be restored following the installation or abandonment of all utilities necessary for the project. 42. Grading and Drainage Plan: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall conduct hydrology studies based on a ten-year storm frequency, prepare an engineered grading and drainage plan, and pay fees required to obtain necessary grading permits. The plans shall comply with the 1998 edition of the California Building Code including Chapters 10, 11, 18,33, and Appendix Chapter 33. 43. Storm Drain Area Fee: Prior to recordation of the parcel map, the applicant shall pay the most current Storm Drain Area fee, currently set at $2,120.00 per net acre, which is $954.00. 44. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Measures: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements, Santa Clara Valley Water District requirements, and the Campbell Municipal Code regarding stormwater pollution prevention. The primary objectives are to improve the quality and reduce the quantity of stormwater runoff to the bay. Resources to achieve these objectives include Storm water Best Management Practices Handbook for New Development and Redevelopment ("CA BMP Handbook") by the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA), 2003; Start at the Source: A Design Guidance Manual for Storm water Quality Protection ("Start at the Source") by the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA), 1999; and Using Site Design Techniques to Meet Development Standards for Stormwater Quality: A Companion Document to Start at the Source ("Using Site Design Techniques") by BASMAA, 2003. 45. Demolition: Prior to recording of the parcel map the applicant shall obtain a demolition permit and remove any nonconforming structures. 46. Street Improvements: Prior to recordation of the parcel map, the applicant shall execute a street improvement agreement, cause plans for public street improvements to be prepared by a registered civil engineer, pay various fees and deposits, post security and provide insurance necessary to obtain an encroachment permit for construction of the standard public street improvements, as required by the City Engineer. The plans shall include the following: a. Show location of all existing utilities within the new and existing public right of way. b. Relocation of all existing utilities including utility boxes, covers, poles, etc. outside of sidewalk area. No utility boxes, covers, etc. will be allowed in the sidewalk area. c. Removal of existing pavement structural street section to centerline. Attachment #6 Page 70f7 d. Installation of City approved street trees at 30 feet on center and landscaping turf. e. Installation of City standard curbt guttert sidewalk and ADA compliant driveway approaches. f. Installation of new engineered pavement structural section to centerlinet as required by the City Engineer. g. Installation of asphalt concrete overlay per street pavement restoration plan for utility installation and/or abandonmentt as required by the City Engineer. h. Installation of streetlights, conduits, conductors and related facilities in accordance with the City of Camp be Irs Street Lighting Policies. 1. Installation of traffic controlt stripes and signs. J. Construction of conforms to existing public and private improvements, as necessary. Attachment #7 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR PLN2005-65 (TREE REMOVAL PERMIT) SITE ADDRESS: APPLICANT: P.C. MEETING: 1819 West Hacienda Avenue Mr. Hamid Adlparvar October 25, 2005 The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that (s)he is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California. The lead department with which the applicant will work is identified on each condition where necessary. Where approval by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, Public Works Director, City Attorney, or Fire Department is required, that review shall be for compliance with all applicable conditions of approval, adopted policies and guidelines, ordinances, laws and regulations, and accepted engineering practices, for the items under review. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that (s) he is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California that pertains to this development and are not herein specified: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division: 1. Approved Proiect: Approval is granted for a Tree Removal Permit to remove six protected trees (five Incense Cedars and one Acacia) on property located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue. The Tree Removal Permit shall only be valid in conjunction with an approved Planned Development Permit (PLN2004-111). 2. Replacement of Removed Trees: The applicant shall provide six 24-inch box replacement trees for the protected trees to be removed as part of the development. 3. Landscape and Irrigation Plan: The applicant shall submit a final landscape and irrigation plan to the Planning Division for review and approval, prior to the issuance of building permits. The landscape and irrigation plan shall substantially conform with the approved conceptual landscape plan and the City's Water Efficient Landscaping Standards (WELS) and shall include all replacement trees as required for the Tree Removal Permit. 4. Tree Protection Plan: The applicant shall submit a tree protection plan for all protected trees to be retained on site or on adjacent lots that are impacted by the project, and shall contain specific information about the preservation of the trees during any grading or building on site. Such tree protection measures shall be installed prior to any demolition, grading, or building on the project site. No construction or trenching shall take place within the drip line of trees and a fence constructed of temporary cyclone fencing or wire mesh securely attached to poles driven into the ground shall be installed around the dripline of the tree. All trimming or branch removal from protected trees shall be completed by a certified arborist. The tree protection plan shall be submitted to the Planning Division for review and approval by the Community Development Director prior to the issuance of building permits. I ~ ~zll ili~! ( r,"~ ~ ~ iiiiih. 00 ~"i!~i i .,. " o . ~ ~ ~ !!H ':u ~ li~uH ~. ~ · .d.~ I Id~~ ~H~~Bi ~ · - r BB' ~ ;; U!;S UUUhUi III >11 i .. !j: ...o~IiI'~!II. ~ i I ~ o~ I ~~ Ii; ~~ ~ ~~i ; ~ i;i ~. -~ii a ::i ~~ -. iU ~~ ~~~ ; ~ : I i! ~.~ q~ g :'1 "II! ~ ~: ~ ~ ... ~ !~~, z I" ~ U~ ~. ~;s ~ ~~;. CD z::IIlIl ~~~ t';: ~~~8 t'i !~~ g~gB ~I ~i~ ~ ~! : .H :i h~ii ili n~ @4ilQ@ < -- z j!: 0 a: ~ = f2 ~ ~ (1)~ ~~ a.. ~o ~~ <( 3::1 ~~ ~UJUJ ~~ ..::: ~~ ~ W c::; ~: > ~~ m2 i= ~~ :~ <( wffi 9t I- a::t ~~ z 31;< ii' W C/lC . c I- ~~ g~ < ;; J: ~ . '" ~ ~ ~ ~~ '" :5~ ~ffi .m ;t~ u. ~ "Hn a: a: WW ww ~..,~ ZZ w;ll. <;<5 :S(1~~ ZZ ~,;__ WW 5"~ ~ Q. -' ~:~~ o ::<5 ."". ~~ (1)0 ~.. a- ~~ tlil " dH 51 5 ~ ~ ~ B < . I H ~ h ~i h~ ~ LZo-Z~-&Ov :Ndlf IfIN~O::lIl\f::l '1138d~lf::l 3nN3AIf 'v'aN31~1fH 6~ln d'v'W 3^ll 'v'lN31 ~ ;; " i i ~ : H . . H r , r f ; Ii ! I '; I i I: I Ii ! : ! u j Ii I : i i. i '! i I i; I I 01 w,;;2 '! . i ! -!. -n l · I!! i to =g i ; , , i . ~ II I I 5 ~. ~;~ J~ ~;Ii~ !~ I ; II ~ i I 'i ;: I ~: I~~!I:~ Ih~nq n n H ~l H ! "I "".. 01 ... iii. _ _ _ _ _ _ I P / -t i --'-- ----...... ~ ~ , II : I , " . " o . E : Ii ~ i ! ~ ! h I : ~l ~;~ . ~ 'Iii . 5 , ~~ 11< , I~' I , I ~! - ~ '. II I 1M! ;'~ii qw:;:ii: i Hi;! ~ : ; , , , I , ." . ,. : II . "=::::. : ~ , Attachment #8 ~ " t- :::-."'<& d'j'i~l j ", " , -1-----j____--r- .L--~---- (JI./Il ,09) d ..?.t.y YiiNar:JYH ~!. I 1-9 ! Iii i~ I III h< ~t! a~! I~ '*; i i- ~ 0 II~; .$1 flU I ~l ~ Ih 0 ; ~I Iii i ;~ ~~l ;De tU ~ :'1 ;1 ll&$....1 lIool I-J\d'l'll J.\UUNll\_l:1tM\l'1lltd\ll:X I ~ ~~ I i "~. ~ ~ !;;!hl" ~ ~ L i~m I . ~ ~ 3;~i! I . ~." .~ = e Ji ~..!r p -. ,. ~; , _ i 5" ~ ~ !; ; (M./tl ,09) g7'-8A^V -VmN1JvII------ iM ~ " l:!~~ r ~.. ~I VINHO::lllVO'1l38dV'NO ht 3nN3^VVON310VH 6~IH ~ . 3ElVNI~a aNV ElNIQV1lEl A~IVlI13~d . :a ! 3 --....!- , ~ : ii . I ii . t I : c ~ ~ ~)- .; .'~ '! ~. O~ f, .Sf L - ~:- ~ : ~ ~ l~l~ I"~ ~ , . 1 ..- U i:~ ....ij i~~ , -p lilIlli! er'8(:tl 'IllS 1Ill! toop'h\311'+~_'" 'IAI:1\"""lIIlN'lllId\JlSllS\:J: ~ vWv6 "VJ 'SOllV SOl Cl31 N3:J ONlddOHS OH:JNVCl 0\:9 Jll 1 N3V'ld013A30 l:Jd 0.. 0<{ :::; >- >- Z U 5 ::l:;':.jM':: V:J 'l138driV:J [ '3AV VON31JVH 'M 6l8l ClVAClVdlOV OIV'lVH ).Cf3~VHS 033"'S '" ~ ""~" .. ~ 'rT~~ ~ ! h ~~ii z ! ~ P H~h ~ Ii .In ii< A u V1 w o ~ I ~ I 0.. , t:' l\,. T\:ob I "18 ll~;~ * ,~ . .11 ~ i: Hng ~ ! ; olI ~ I! g .. .. c 81 , I ; I ~ ~I ~:::)i -.Ji ffi > ~ ~ Q Z ~ ~ U ~ ~ 0\ ......-I 00 ......-I .,.......' .......i I; e---, ,--), -1' ~ Q ~ 0<{ ~ -! o ~~ :=: Zm o u <.:l Z is --' 5 ro ,LHHHS II.1AOJ "'" "-1 ~ < ! o . ii :: ~~!~ x ~= Y"~nHH ~ li;i Hqpn~~ ~I ~I~ nhdHl1 ~J__~_~__~!_~~_ ~ ~L~]_ j r!_'__ _______ h II! ,,! " D. ~ !-- > :/. ~ ! K ~ j K ~ - ~ _ . ~ 8 ~ ~ I ; ~ , ~ il Iii < 5 3 ~ ! i i i I ~ . ". R ~ ~11:!;11 ~ ~~ di~ :i! v=Ill'1 I >- z o i= 0.. ;; 5 ~ tQ j o i I~ i ~ .. ~ ~ d II-- I I I , I I I I I , , I ~ ___ I --I I , I I I I ! ~ I L________j Attachment #9 c UJ > - W o UJ a: S t :! " < i i ! ~;t i S R i=: -1:'-1:' I~" ~~~~ ~8~' ~H i!. ~ i~~ ~ "88 ii:ll I ;1; ~!li ~,~. !,~. !Ii. nh d.. FIll1 2 0 I k - 1 1 .0 ~ I~ Lt"') = = C'-.J cq cq 0- W en ImIIJJ . G ~ . ~ ~ & ~ ! '~" -~... ii -. ___, . r ------!"_- ' . ~ .. (Ji/y. 09) -7 ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - -- f- toOt6 "'IJ '5011'1 501 OHJN"~ 5011'1 501 or9 ~'IMI'ldlO'l OW'l'IH '" ^~3Y.'IH5 C33'1S 531 '18 >IJ.'r 'IJ ' 1138dl'NJ 3nN3^ 'I 'ION31J'IH 619 I ':~);.;3N"G ":;'::,:;:iCiJ':'l:J30';J.,c: ~ . .. - . .. JJ , "" . .. ~. i" -. ~- Ii . . ""- ~-f ~ . lI!! . ... 2..: ~I :!l I -I I t ""-1 3 I ~ oJ ~I i Z I. I I I I a) I I I I I ,;~~~~~ !,i J. r ,OO.!;9 3 .Sv.9L N ~;J ~ ., ~ ~ ... ;J m ;,i I ~ I- 0 -' ~ ~ ~ .- ~ ! ",J 0 ~ ~ NV1d g,LlS - " I 1'1; ~ I t -.:r:: ';15 . . ,.,. ... . ... ... . ;;: i '. ': <1:. . . =ii !:ai .. i~i ... ., c.=:) ..; " "!l ..i ~ ;:i n :~! ~I 0-: ui f:".j (7)i " N 0 I N <( I n 0 I- "<t- O -' Z 0... <( 1ITITTId' . ~ ~ z ~ ~ : ~ 1 ? W-r6 "\1'8 'SOll\l SOl <l3.LN3::J <lNlddOHS OH::JN\I<l 01:9 -::JNI NOIDn<llSNO::J l::Jd \1'8 'll38dt'l\1'8 [ '3^\I 'tON31::J\lH -M 6191 <l\l^<l\ldlO\l OIt'l\lH 'i )"C!3>i'v'HS G33'v'S <U" "" "_ . ~ i . ~~ gr. f~ i "i i J_ ~ ----- . ~ (Ai/Y ,09) J -~-~-;~~--------- ----.i : = =-.. Ii . ii . -L___ eo!- . ,. .. Ii! ;::. ________-!-___: n~ . ~ ;~'w ;i bS ~ No ,SIr.9l S ,OO'SI :\ , = , I . , . .. Ir. f}----~C-------~-------~l 'j : : .. ,I l k ~. i . .' . . e I I ~I I " : ~I~; : 3: ;" . _ I SI ,,:. I .,. 'I .J ;t : .,. .'.Ii 1 ' i Ii ,'".Z J <t ~ ',';' '.f ~..-} I ~ L . ,- I- ,. ~ I .i,1 I :.' .,'.1 1 0 1 I '_' ,'. I --...l t is, ... I . 8"'-. I ~:.~;": ~= " ": :.i .= , 1 " C ,r , 1 1 , 1 ,:~;;; - ----iifi;---' .~'~ 3,".9' N - .,1 .1 .i CD I- o ---' ~I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 , 1 1 1 -------____J ~ . ,. ,OO'OS 3 ,Sp.9l N i ; 7i ~tll ,10 -'1-' (lIe , 11 LL:i .- r-1Li i7,i If> ~ Ef ./,07 NV7d ] S YJJ,~" b> ~ a . . . a-' .~! :;:;z: m . . Ii ..i .. f'- N o I N CD I n o I- ~ 0 ---' z CL <( .,... ~ .,... i j- I ~ ('.,r.. I ' ' "---1- '--- , c) ~~: ~ & ! - .001>6 '12J '5011'1 501 <:131 N30 ~NlddOHS OH:JN'1<! 5011\1 501 0,9 '10 '1138dl'1V0 "3M vON310'1H 'M 6L8L <!'1^<!'1dlOV OIY1'1H 'i' A<!3>1\1HS 033\15 S31'tlS >t:rvr :~-;::;~GC~ "J , ~I ~ NV7d (JO 0 7.1 i jl~C\1 j 1 I! I i! ! I 11 ~ & !-f,:;.~r~.!.~~:G:j ~:'C ~:-( ", ~ I (,~ I -j ~ ~! ; '~I ::CI cq eLl '-',1 --"j S.~ LLlli: _.- -----', ; : ---------.-.j D ~ U,::, , ~",' , 'I r-'- -( , 1 ~ : F-,-,", i ; ! ~: ~ & i I HOv6 'V'J '5011'1 501 1J31N3'J ~NlddOHS OH'JN'Vd 5011'1 501 or9 1."'l::;/'";dlS;~::':) ::".'':l II'J '1138d~II'J [ '3/1', 'VON31'J'VH 'M 6 ~91 CI'V^CI'VdlO'V OI~I'VH 'I' ':;::::' :,;'~,- . I! I o z w Cl W -1 i ~ ii i ~ ~ ~ ~ i: ~ I ~ ~ I . 1100 ~ ~ ~ : I I ~ ~ I~I ~: ~ ~y~i~i.i & g g ~ ~ ~ ~ ..~ ~ ~ -= ~ ; ~ ::::l-------~------- == " in ~ ~ NV7cI (j007d ! 1l ~ ...-1 I "'- . '. C\l i .. i I i 1 ~ (").........: I.~ ~._, .. , \'_/ I zi -:....1.1: ~i *i '-,)1 (::'1 ~i ~! ~: I ~ 8 i !-!C'.:.:;(1:.!.:,1,0.:J '.J~ 1f::J '1138dVW::J "]A\>, \>'ON31:J\>'H 'M 61BI ~\>'/,<i\>'dlO\>' OIl'WH 'I' ^~3~\>'HS 033\>'S 531 \:18 >I:J'vT 'S!.,:;'Jil"<' tZOt6v'J 'SOllV SOl <i31N3:J <JNlddOHS OH'JNV<i SOll\>' SOl 0,9 .... I N o I in <0 I -..,. o I in o z w (;) W ---1 j ~I; ~ ~ hi I ~ ; !100~ ~ ~ : ~ 1 ~ ~ 1.1 UT~ ;iai~n~ .>; ,t .B ,B ,,0 ,01 ~ ;; II "t ,II ..B ,01 ~ ~ ; s ~ x g Ii ,,1> '>;1 NV7d '(j007il ,,0-,0 "B ,B ; ] s ~ "~""- -..,. I <0 !' j; ] ! ! C\I C\I ~ I r",<: ""'v'-. L-1._~ L- (~\ ,-j .-J _I LI SI ~, , W-I ,-t'~1 ::51 C:.:)I --'I ,c_1 1 e! ~i >~I ~: ~ '0'8 'll38d~'t8 "3^\f \fON318\fHM s.ai ~\f^~\fdlO\1 al~\fH 'I' ^~3~\fHS 033'o'S 531 'V8 >l:)\I'r ',;:s::'-!!'.1a,; i'Wi'S 'o'J 'SOll'o' SOl ~31N3J ~NlddOHS OHJN'o'Cl SOll\' SOlO\:9 NV7d dOO(J "J; 2: <! --.Jl l! i '::=.-1 '......Ji C:I~ eLl ~ f : ~ .; " C) C'J I ~ <...,- --'-, i-- ~-, <-) ~ ~.I I i " m" ~"">.~ [ 1f:J '1138dl'jlf:J ")/,'. \lON31::JvH 'M 6191 C1v^,lvdlOv OII'WH 'i' ^C13~\lHS 033\15 vWv6 \I:) '5011'1 501 C131N3::J ~NlddOHS OH:)N\ld 5011\1 501 or9 NY7d .-JOON NOI':':;,.l:l5i.lO: :::.'" ~i cq ~:=.: 1 ~l~ -- .C\') i 1 ~ I ! r~ CD ~ ,,---- ( j "__.t ---' ~ .1:0.6 V'J 'SOllV 501 <J31N3'J "NlddOHS OH'JNVd SOllV 501 0,9 ~K:.'.:.:J~"'1.;.Nt;,::. :::'e ~ VO '1138dl'i\lO ']AV VON31'J\lH 'M 6L9, dV^<JVdlOV OIVWH 'I' Ad3>1VHS 033V5 531 'V8 >t::)'vr :S:i~,,':::J'" ':> ,=1 <::: ~i -.-.J; Lll " r--!J 7ii r:;:,. .-'1...... ("r":- ~!~ NOI.LFA373 (jOJ'cJ3.LX3 ':::~.1-:":' l2::riS ~ ;1 ~,. _i <(; ~>! u' -Ii WI. 19 1--1'" =;: C)!~ -I c:.:!~ ~ . i k k a "t- I ~ < ~-- .~) -----' ~ ~ tZOtB V:J 'SOll. SOl <J31N3:J "NiddOHS OH:JN'o'<J SOll'<' SOl or9 NVI,i.::Jf1i;i.S':";):- !::"c: ;~ .~-.. ;I ~ z I: I: I: I: I: I: ,1 : , I' , , , , :1 'I :1 Ii :I: III :11 111 III :1: ll[ :1: :1: ll: ill lit " " :1 Ii II !l 11 , :I I ~ I ~ !I) I :';1 d """'7"1 \:::'11 --, ;-! :S! GJ~ --!: Wj,? ~:-I ~i~ 'o':J '1138dtW:J ':l,W '.ON:lI:J\fH 'M BlSl <JvA<J'o'dlO. OI'WH 'I' A<J3)l'IIHS 033.S 531 VB >l:J'\"r :'::':S30l3G~ NOIL VA 373 (fOnI3.LX3 .:=;-....IJ....:t,~ ~ .1;1 ;1 HI~ I I!II W I I I I I I I l , U I ~ : II: :ll I I :ll :1: :I: :1: :Jl n: :11 n: n: :1: ll: :q :1: 11: ,:1: z ill C>! :1: <( :1: :1: 'I' il: , I :1: :1: :1: :1: ll[ :1: :1: 11: :1: :1: :1: :1: :1: 'I' :1: , , " JI: :11 :ll :1: 11: :1: [I: :1: 'I' ill itL II: ~ I ili 81 t 1 dl ";'2'1'1 -....: w; c;::,~ r-' b!~ _H~ ! ~ - j j I & "i" I '""'<: ---- .,,,,- i --.....:..- (---, ~I i j . i. ...,(;::.:;r,~l.<;;I;O:-:. :;:;~ VJ 'l138dt"lVJ "3^V VON31JVH 'M 6191 <IV MIV dlOV OI>'iVH " ^<l3~VHS 033VS 531 '18 >l::r'l'r ;S:;3c-CJ'<' NOI.L Y..lY7Y (JOI(JY.LXY T'JIJ I~:=H~ C\l < j ~I 1 4 i . '""'i u & tWt6 VJ 'SOl Tv SOl <l31N30 ~NlddOHS OHONV<I SOllV SOlO\:9 ('(-"i l_1....-1 L_ I r' . I ;i ,~' ;~ I, ~ ISo f-J r I I I I I I I , I I I I ! : I I I , I I I I I I I ~ I I , ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I , ~, I ?! , Qi , I 'I , c::; , I f-. I , ~~i : <t' I I >: I I Wi UJI I jl I ...JI I wi I ! wi. I I r--:'7 I , !9 I I I ;:1: I Z;' I I I I I 2!5 I r....,l~ I I ~ 5ijg I I I !..;..;~ I I , I , I I , I ~ l I ~ I I l I I ~ , I: l I ~ I I i I I : ~ : ,] 1'1 ! l tl: I 'm-:, , I I I I I d ! iI-I II I I : ~ : ;( l.... ;i ~>'I ~ . ~ 8 . li , ;'<:0;'6 \lJ '5011\1 501 ~31N3J ~NlddOHS OH:>N\lo 5011\1 501 or9 ;,:'::;':;,"'1:.:.2:!,r:J ,J.: .1-.1 I :h ~ I I ~itH I:: I I" , I: l: " , " , I 1] " , I , , I :: I " I " I :: I " ~ r l ~ :: :1 ]: :11: : :1:: : :1:: : :,:: : h: : : :t:: J :ll: : :1:: : :1: 1 :1: : :1: : ill: lll: ll: : 1.1 I 11: 1 'I' :1: :1: :1: 'I' , , Ii: :1] 'I' ;I! " P: :1] :1 : :1: I: :J:: : H-U I:: fl I : 1 : 81 I I I I I :::: ~"I:~ ;~ ;~ I/'J 'l138dV'l\i'J '3M \lON31:>\lH 'M 61el ,,\I",,\ldlO\l OIYWH " ^o3~\lHS 03315 531 \18 ~J\lr ."',0." ,---',' r-' <'f! -. ~~;, Ll-!: cJio " CC7 C5i~ Q:!~ NOI.LVAH7:!! (JOnI:!!.LXH .~ " I I ~ l ~ , ~ ~ :1 :1 ti 'I [I ~I 'I II .~>I :...ul 'I dl! II , :1 =!~ :1 ~Jl~ :1 :1 :1 ~ ~ ~ ~ , , , , -, , , I , I )~. I ;~ ~ . I S~ I I I 1 I , C") ":j- I "<li I~"'~---\ L...L.., ,- I I~._, ~ ~ ;.ZO;.S "\lJ '5011\1 SOl ~J1N3:) ~NlddOHS OH:)NV~ 01:9 :Jl' IIN3V'tdOl3A30 l:Jd """"" v:) 'llJ8dI'lV:) '3IIV vON31:)\lH 'M SIR' ~\fM:jvd10v alY'lVH ~ ^~3~VH5 OJ3VS 5]1'9'8 >I:Jvr 'SS3lKXIY ~NIdV:JS([NV7 ~ " E E _ S ~ j -: I - f l Ii .i I 11~ & ,; l 6 , :rul.l 133HS CLl -'0: ... ~~ 1'-* I u~ Ie ~~ - ~ I- 3; --r----f-----.. ---"-ll ____- . r is--- ~~----- - ~ ;:1 ~i z <( ....J a... UJ a... <( o CJ) o z <( ....J . i-J'~ CUB7b". 'I'REE R1lVlCE.INC. 11110 ANNE LAN" CUPl:JrnNO. CA 11014 (411) "'7071 Tree Survey With Tree Protection Guidelines January 10, 2005 Prepared for: Mr. Hamid Adlparvar PCI Construction, Inc. 327 S. Baywood Avenue San Jose, CA. 95128 Project at: 1819 Hacienda Avenue Campbell, CA. Prepared by: Ron Walker - pres. Michael Tyers - asso. (#l97-WC) Area Custom Tree Service, Inc. 19160 Anne Lane Cupertino, CA. 95014 Attachment #10 C(Q)~)f Table of Contents 1.0 Definition of assignment 2.0 Summary 3.0 Inventory 4.0 Trees Not Suitable For Preservation 5.0 Tree Preservation Guidelines: Specific Trees 6.0 Tree Preservation Guidelines: General 7.0 Appendices 8.0 Literture and Authorities 9.0 Site Map with Marked Tree Protection Zones lJLJlefinition of assipment. We were asked to provide a tree survey, along with a tree preservation plan for the property at the above-mentioned address. Within this scope of work, we will evaluate the health, structure and . potential hazard of all the trees on the site. We will also recommend which trees are suitable or not suitable for preservation. We were asked to specify procedures by which to protect and minimize construction impact to any heritage tree that is in close proximity to the new proposed construction. ~o Summary: This property is an empty lot in the City of Campbell. The proposed plan calls for two new homes be built on the site. Prior to beginning any construction, it is mandatory that general contractor meet with the project arborist, to go over and answer any questions regarding the guidelines in this report.. In section 3.0 of this report, we list an inventory of trees on site, along with their trunk diameter in inches, which is measured at S4-inches above soil grade. Next to each tree is a reference as to whether the recommendation is to preserve or remove the tree. You will also find on this page the distinction of heritage tree or not, current condition and individual comments. In section 4.0 of this report, we recommend a total of 16 trees for removal because they are not suitable for preservation due to health and or their structural development. In section 5.0 of this report, we recommend specific guidelines for 6 trees that are dose to the proposed construction activity. In section 6.0 of this report, we recommend general guidelines for trees that are i.IW!k and outsid~ the influence of the proposed construction activity. In section 9.0 of this report, is the site map with the tree protection zone marked. This is where the protective cyclone fencing shall be installed and absolutely no entry into this area will be allowed unless approved by project arOOrist. The tree protection zone is the most criti~Jement Ul pro_tint en., trees. fJ 8 j "'0 I II al I 8 ~ I i I I ftI I ftI I -! g "2 1 'j '5 '5'5 '5 '5 fl c:j '- '- i '- G) G) s ~~ G) ~ j "'0 ~ '1 ftI .2 c: c: c: c: ~ -8 8 j ... I! ~ I! l! l! oe ~ go! '- ~ , g ftI ftI ftI III c: G) ~ 'C 'C 'c 'C ~ ! ... ; I I II G) ,.- i G) Ii -I ~ .!! { ~ ! ~ .! i ! I ! 1 g jfJ ~ ,J I 1;) ~ ~ ~ ~ ... fJ e e ! - 1i ftI ... fJ fJ -J ~ .! iii '& I~ .; ! !.B .B~ ~ .B ... :lI :lI I 'f! l ~ ~ rA g ~ E ! 1:1 e .s ~ i ! ~ ,~ .= c: :t -I ... i at 1t J J. ~ ~ ftI u II ~ 1;; o~ ! .= ) J j ~ ] e rA rA !1 u u I il "'0 t CiS ~ U ftI :t: e e "'0 "'0 III ~ 0 -8 ~ g U) .! 0 ~1;; 1;)1;) 1;) 1;; .! .! -8 c ~ ~ i I...... irl ! ! ~ ! ~ ~ G) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > ~J - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (\') G) c! f'. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! IX IX IX ! ! ! ! ! IX ! ! IX IX IX ! i :::J .2 ~ - N - - "It N N LI) ~ ~N NN N N (\') ~ (\') ~ ~ (\') ~ - fJ fJ CD cS '5 I~ 8 , G) J ~ fJ LI) 'C rA ! g ! ~!! II rA I I 0 :! ~ ~ 8 g g g ~ g g g g g g .... .. - ~ rA .. .. "It .. .. ftI .! ,... co .- U) LI) 5 ~ ~ . . I . . .. .. .. .. .. > . ~ U) (\') N ! ~ .. .. + + .. + .. .. .. .. .. .. .. + + . :lI < C 0 N . .. .. 0 .. .. .. - U)co coco co co .. . .. . . ~ . ... ~ N N ~ (\') . .- ~ (\') co - - - - - - - ~ ~ (r) (r) (r) N U) ~ ... ! rA ! ! ! ! rA rA c: ~ E 5 elf 0 l! j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -I ~ -s ell l! .j :lI :J :J :J '( 'i :: G) -8-8 -8~ ~ if <') E ~ ~ - ! ~ ,.!!, I..!!, om, .c: co .~ J! f i~ H ~ i ~ - j ! ! j ~ ~ I l! ! i 0 1 l :ti ~ ftI I 8 ! ! i I ! ftI '2 !I !I ~J j fJ ! u ~ rA J ftI E l! ~ c: 2 c: c8 S ftI i f ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ d :f < i . < ... < < ::J ::J .f ~ I '- ~~ '- '- '- '- ~ -8-8 ftI ! ... >- E dd CD CD i e ~ ~ w uu u u Ii 5 J 0 0 I II II I I ! III M 8 ... :;::; '0 2 2 II , 2 1 .8 i ... ] w ! IJ IJ, ! ~ 11 11 G) 1 I E ~ 6 fJ fJ ~ ... cS if :J < 0 < < zs: 0 -J 0 < zs: - - N (\') ~ LI) U) ..... co en 0 -N (\')~ II') U) ..... co en 0 - N (\') .- -- -- - - .- .- 0- N N N N CD III x ><~ ~ ! x fJ \ i / --.( ~rees Dot soital!le for DreservatioD 4.1 Chinese Elm (11) This mature Elm is located along the street front in the middle of the property. It has developed off balanced and leaning to the south. This was due to an overcrowding situation with a large Acacia next to it. There is a significant risk for limb failure with this tree because it has a tremendous amount of end weight on long extended lateral limbs. If this tree were to remain, it would require substantial end weight reduction pruning. But no amount of pruning mitigation will correct the off balanced structure of this tree. To further explain this situation, if you were to draw an imaginary line vertically up from this tree's root collar, all the upper crown is on one side of that line. Therefore, we could go either way on the preservation or removal of this tree. 4.2 Flowering Acacia (12) This mature Acacia is also located along the street and is the tree that is overshadowing tree #1. This tree is highly stressed, showing a serious decline of foliage mass and small annual shoot growth. A mature fungal disease producing a large conk is seen on the trunk at 2-foot above grade. This large conk is the heart rot fungus Ganoderma sp.. If requested we can send a sample to a plant pathologist for confirmation. This type of fungus digests the internal lignin and cellulose fibers, leaving the internal wood structure without structural support. Once the disease advances sufficiently, the tree will be subject to wind throw. There is no way of knowing when this failure might happen because this disease does not significantly affect the vascular system until very advanced, as it is now. If this tree were to fail, the target zone includes the street, city right of way, tree (#1) and a large area in the front of this property. We recommend the immediate removat of this tree due to the potential hazard it creates. 4.3 Citrus (#3) This small tree has lost many limbs and is now structured in an off-balanced orientation. There are numerous ripped cuts and twiggy deadwood through out the crown. It is not worth trying to preserve and should be removed. 4.4 A vacoto (14) This small tree was cut down to 2-foot above grade and re-sprouted with three water sprouts, which now makes up the crown. That 2-foot high stump shows decay completely through it. This tree will fail at that point and the only question would be, when. This tree is a hazard and should be removed. 4.5 A vacoto (#S) This small tree was also cut down to I-foot above grade and re-sprouted with two water sprouts, which now make up the crown. One of these developed stems has a dead top. This 1- foot high stump shows decay completely through it. Like the other A vacoto, this tree will fail at that point and the only question would be when. This tree is a hazard and should be removed~ 4.6 Plum (16) This mature tree has many vertical stems that make its crown. We don't see any problem with its health or structure. The location of this tree is inside the building footprint. 4.7 Citrus (17) This tree is very stressed, showing poor vigor. There is major dead limbs and twiggy deadwood though out the crown. This tree is not a candidate for preservation. 4.8 Apple (#8) This little Apple tree is in very poor health because it has been neglected in the past. Major portions of this tree crown are dead or dying. It is not a candidate for preservation. 4.9 Incense Cedar (#12-116) These 5 trees are located in a row near the center of the property. They are all within a few feet of one another and share the same root zone area. There is ivy engulfing each of these trees all the way to the top of the crown. You can observe thinning and dieback in the exterior crown. After a closer look, evidence revels a canker disease, known as Botryosphaeria in some limbs in the upper crown. This disease can spread to other host plants, such as the neighbor's healthy semi-mature Redwood trees. The proposed driveway on the plan calls for the removal of three of these trees. Our recommendation would be to remove two more, for a total of 5 trees. The reason for this is because these trees are so close to one another that the change of environment (in terms of the other Cedars) could jeopardize their stability and affect their health. 4.11 Privet (#18) This small tree had been cut down to a stump but has re- . sprouted since. This tree is not a candidate for preservation. 4.12 Crabapple (#19) This small tree has' bad structure due to the overshadowing of the large Cedar trees next to it. The low light levels on one side have caused it to grow in one direction. This tree is not a candidate for preservation. 4.13 Plum (123) This small tree is located next to the south perimeter fence~ 1/3 of the way back from the street. This tree is pushing against the fence and will continue to be problem with the fence in the future. We would recommend its removal. . . . . . 5.1 Loquat (#9) This tree's crown is full and shows signs of good vigor. Considering its size~ location and good health, it would be desirable to retain in the landscape scheme. The following steps need to be taken in order to insure the trees optimum health. 1.) Spread a 2 to 3 inch layer of organic wood chips within the dripline for water retention and to moderate soil temperatures but do not place around the root collar. 2.) The only pruning that should be done to this tree is thinning and lifting. This can be done before the protective fencing is installed. 3.) Protective fencing shall be 6-foot cyclone with 8-foot posts spaced 6-foot apart and driven into the ground 2-feet. This fencing shall be placed a minimum of 10-feet from face of trunk, as per the site map. No entry will be allowed without consent from project arborist. 5.2 2 Incense Cedars (110 & Ill) These trees are the same species and stand-alone in the middle of the property. They are healthy specimens, showing no signs of disease although the foliage is a slightly off color. The following steps need to be taken in order to insure their optimum health. 1.) Spread a 2 to 3 inch layer of organic wood chips within the dripline for water retention and to moderate soil temperatures but do not place around the root collar. 2.) No pruning shall be done at this time. 3.) Protective fencing shall be 6-foot cyclone with 8-foot posts spaced 6-foot apart and driven into the ground 2-feet. This fencing shall be placed 10-feet from face of trunk, as per the site map. This fence could be continuous around both trees and also include the Loquat tree. No entry win be , allowed without consent from project arborist. 4.) During the growing season (June - Sept.) these trees will need to have supplemental irrigation. The best way to achieve this is to use lQD& soaker hoses. Place hoses half way between the trunk and the protective fencing, then meander it to cover as much of the root zone as possible. If any of the root zone is missed during first application, then the hose should be moved to cover the remainder root zone and continue watering till the irrigation process is complete. This irrigation application should be run for 2 hour on a weekly basis. 5.) In March or April this tree should have injection fertilization with a slow release organic fertilizer. This will help with the foliage color and increasing its annual shoot growth. 5.3 Citrus (117) This small tree has a lot of twiggy deadwood in the exterior crown but produces good fruit. It needs some pruning to remove the deadwood in the exterior crown. Also, would be beneficial for its health. 1.) Spread a 2 to 3 inch layer of organic wood chips within the dripline for water retention and to moderate soil temperatures but do not place around the root collar. 2.) Pruning should be done in March or April, after the chance of freezing temperatures are gone. 3.) You can include this tree's fencing with the Cedar fencing. No entry will be allowed without consent from project arborist. 4.) During the growing season (June - Sept.) this tree will need to have supplemental irrigation. The best way to achieve this is to use km& soaker hoses. Place hoses halfway between the trunk and the protective fencing, then meander it to cover as much of the root zone as possible. If any of the root zone is missed during first application, then the hose should be moved to cover the remainder root zone and continue watering till the irrigation process is complete. This irrigation application should be run for 1 hour on a weekly basis. 5.) In March or April this tree should have injection fertilization with a slow release organic fertilizer. This will help with increasing annual shoot growth. 5.4 2 Privet (#20 & #21) This tree is located within a foot of the south perimeter fence-line toward the rear of the property. It provides substantial screening of the neighboring property . We would recommend preserving this tree. 1.) Spread a 2 to 3 inch layer of organic wood chips within the dripline for water retention and to moderate soil temperatures but do not place around the root collar. 2.) No pruning at this time 3.) Protective fencing shall be 6-foot cyclone with 8-foot posts spaced 6-foot apart and driven into the ground 2-feet. This fencing shall be placed 6-feet from face of trunk, as per the site map. This fence could be continuous around both trees and also include the Almond tree. No entry will be allowed without consent from project arborist. 5.7 Lg Almond (122) This borderline tree is located along the right fence line near the rear of the property. It has been polarded in the past and there are numerous dead stubs through out the crown. This is a mature tree and provides excellent screening of the neighboring structure. We would recommend preserving this tree. 1.) Spread a 2 to 3 inch layer of organic wood chips within the dripline for water retention and to moderate soil temperatures but do not place around the root collar. 2.) No pruning at this time 3.) Protective fencing shall be 6-foot cyclone with 8-foot posts spaced 6-foot apart and driven into the ground 2-feet. This fencing shall be placed 10-feet from face of trunk, as per the site map. This fence could be continuous around around all three trees. No entry will be allowed without consent from project arborist. 6J>> Tree Preservation Goid.djnes: Gener,.. 6.1 No parking or vehicle traffic may travel over any root zones unless using buffers approved by Project Arborist. 6.2 Monitor root zone moisture and maintain as per above. 6.3 Have an arOOrist repair any tree damage promptly. 6.4 Demolition shall be performed with alertness and caution whenever near trees. Care must be taken to minimize activity beneath trees' branches. Hand work may be necessary. If allowed, stub off demo' ed utilities to avoid the disruption of soil within the root ZODe. 6.5 No pouring or storage of fuel, oil, chemicals, or hazardous materials under these foliage canopies. 6.6 No grade changes (cuts, fills,etc.) with in the driplines of these trees without prior consent from Project Arborist. 6.7 The method for site preparation of scraping the surface soil with a blade must not be allowed beneath tree canopies. Hand grubbing with a pick-mattocks can be sufficiently effective and saves tree roots. 6.8 Any temporary construction site utilities (electric, water, communication, ect.) shall be placed so as not to affect foliage crowns or roots of trees to be retained. Infringement on any tree's space requires Project ArOOrist consultation. 6.9 Intrusion beneath any tree's canopy must be minimized for all trenches, including; electric, sewer, water, gas, decorative/security lighting, or irrigation. Where practicable (and approved), use common trenches for multiple utilities. Trenches must be routed to sever only a minimum of tree roots. Positioning trenches in driveways/roadways is often least intrusive. Trench plans within any existing dripline must be reviewed and approved by the Project ArOOrist before being implemented. Tunneling under roots is preferable to severing, especially for larger roots. No roots shall be severed over 3- inches without project arborist approval. 6.10 No storage of construction materials under any foliage canopy without prior Project ArOOrist approval. 6.11 No trenching within the critical root zone area. Consult Project ArOOrist before any trenching or root cutting beneath any tree's foliage canopy. 6.12 No clean out of b'ucks, tools or other equipment over the or close to the protected root zone. 6.13 No attachment of signs or other construction apparatus to trees or protective fences. 6.14 Limit future activity under any tree's canopies. Especially within critical root zone. Consult Project Arborist before any implementation of plant material or irrigation. No water shall be applied or directed near any trees root crown. ~ (Assumptions and Limiting Conditions) 7.1 No responsibility is assumed for matters legal in character. 7.2 It is assumed that this property is not in violation of any applicable codes, ordinances, statutes, or other governmental regulations. 7.3 Care has been taken to obtain aU information from reliable sources. All data has been verified insofar as possible; however, the consultant can neither guarantee nor be responsible for the accuracy of information provided by others. 7.4 The consultant shall not be required to give testimony or to attend court by reason of this report unless subsequent contractual arrangements are made. 7.5 Loss or alteration of any part of this report invalidates the entire report. 7.6 Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply right of publication or use for any purpose by any other person to whom it is addressed, without the prior expressed written or verbal consent of the consultant. 7.7 Neither all nor any part of the contents of this report, nor copy thereof, shall be conveyed by anyone, including the client, to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales or other media, without the prior expressed written or verbal consent of the consultant - particularly as to value conclusions, identity of the consultant, or any reference to any professional society or institute or to any initialed designation conferred upon the consultant as stated in his qualification. 7.8 This report and any values expressed herein represent the opinion of the consultant and in no way contingent upon the reporting of a specified value, a stipulated result, the occurrence of a subsequent event, not upon any finding to be reported. 7.9 Sketches, diagrams, graphs and photographs in this report, being intended as visual aids, are not necessarily to scale and should not be construed as engineering or architectural reports or surveys. 7.10 Unless expressed otherwise: 1) information contained in this report covers only those items that were examined and reflects the condition of those items at the time of inspection; and 2) the inspection is limited to visual examination of accessible items without dissection, excavation, probing, or coring. There is no warranty or guarantee, expressed or implied, that problems or deficiencies of the plants or property in question may not arise in the future. Harris, Clark, Maheny. 1999. Arboriculture: integrated management of landscape trees, shrubs and vines. (3M edition) Prentice-Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458 Matheny, Clark. 1994. A photographic guide to the evaluation of hazard trees in urban area. (2Dd edition) International Society of Arboriculture. Wadley Graphix Corp. Champaign, Illinois. Matheny, Clark. 1998. Trees and development: A technical guide to preservation of trees during land development. International Society of Arboriculture. Exponent Publishers, Inc. Hagerstown, IN 47346 Watson, Neely. 1995. Trees and building sites. Proceedings of an international conference held in the interest of developing a scientific basis for managing trees in proximity to buildings. International Society of Arboriculture. P.O. Box 3129 Champaign, Illinois 61826-3129 !J>> Si~ witlLXree protection Zones Marked - (see last page) We adhere to the most up-to-date arboricuIture pmctices - ANSI A300 Pruning Standards and ANSI Z133.1 Safety Standards.. /. This concludes our report and if anyone has any, questions reganling it, please don't hesitate to call. ResPlCtfuIly submitted, fM~ ..~~ Ron Walker-pres. ~ Michael Tycm - 8880. ISA Certified Arborist 1197-WC Area Custom Tree Service, Inc. Member of; International Society of Arboriculture, National Arborist Association, California Arborist Association Attachment #11 CITY OF SAN JOSE TOWN OF LOS G.ATOS Location Map 1819 W. Hacienda Ave. File No: PLN2004-1 09/11 0/111 & PLN2005-65 Legend - City Limits - Parcel Lines ---- o~ . CA-11 . ~<l'> ~ (<' - t"" U r" ... ~<" "- '- (,' O~CHI'''O' CITY OF CAMPBELL Community Development Department October 14, 2005 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission of the City of Campbell has set the time of 7:30 p.m., or shortly thereafter, on Tuesday, October 25, 2005, in the City Hall Council Chambers, 70 North First Street, Campbell, California, for a Public hearing to consider the application of Mr. Hamid Adlparvar, on behalf of Mr. Jack Bates, for approval of the a Zone Change (PLN2004-109) from R-1-9 to P-D; Tentative Parcel Map (PLN2004-11 0) for a two-lot subdivision; Planned Development Permit (PLN2004- 111) to allow the construction of two new single-family homes; and Tree Removal Permit (PLN2005-65) to remove six protected trees (five Incense Cedars and one Acacia) on property owned by Mr. Jack Bates located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue in an R-1-9 (Single-Family Residential) Zoning District. Staff is recommending that this project be deemed Categorically Exempt under CEQA. Interested persons may appear and be heard at this hearing. Please be advised that if you challenge the nature of the above project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing described in this Notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Campbell Planning Commission at, or prior to, the Public Hearing. Questions may be addressed to the Community Development Department at (408) 866-2140. Decisions of the Planning Commission may be appealed to the City Council. Appeals must be submitted to the City Clerk in writing within 10 calendar days of an action by the Commission. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, listening assistive devices are available for all meetings held in the Council Chambers. If you require accommodation, please contact the Community Development Department at (408) 866-2140, at least one week in advance of the meeting. PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL SHARON FIERRO SECRETARY PLEASE NOTE: When calling about this Notice, please refer to File No. PLN2004-1 09/11 0/111 & 2005-65 Address: 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue 70 North First Street. Campbell, California 95008-1436 ' TEL 408.866,2140 . FAX 408.866.8381 . TOD 408,866,2790 ...-- CITY OF SAN JOSE TOWN OF LOS GATOS Location Map 1819 W. Hacienda Ave. File No: PLN2004-1 09/11 0/111 & PLN2005-65 Legend - City Limits - Parcel Lines -- 403 12009 403 12015 403 12023 Kevin Ebrahimi Dale Lewis Heide Howard 1829 Regina Way 1776 Regina Way 1765 W Hacienda Ave Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 403 12027 403 12 033 403 12 034 Hamid Adlparvar Colleen Stoner Larisa V orik 630 Rancho Shopping Ctr 890 Oak Park Dr 2890 Del Lorna Dr Los Altos, CA 94024 Morgan Hill, CA 95037 Campbell, CA 95008 403 12 035 403 12036 403 12037 Marjorie Humphrey James & Margaret Wagner Richard & Donna Campbell 2888 Del Lorna Dr 2882 Del Lorna Dr PO Box 1234 Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 Chester, CA 96020 403 12038 403 12 039 403 12 040 Bryant & Janice Srnall John Strick Paul Braund 2866 Del Lorna Dr 2858 Del Lorna Dr 2852 Del Lorna Dr Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 403 12 066 403 12067 403 12068 Randall & Gwen Frederick Daniel & Tanuny Davies Lynn Vuong Hieu 1835 Regina Way 1845 Regina Way 1785 W Hacienda Ave Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 403 12 069 403 12 070 403 12071 Betty West Tobias & Trina Bauglunan Paul & Ursula Warren 10115 Byrne Ave 1789 W Hacienda Ave 1791 W Hacienda Ave Cupertino,CA 95014 Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 403 12072 403 12073 403 12074 Elise Schwartz Neville & Samantha Carvalho Daniel Weinblatt 1793 W Hacienda Ave 1795 W Hacienda Ave 1797 W Hacienda Ave Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 403 12 075 403 12 076 403 12 077 David & Jessica Boyd Edward Olson Shelby Cunningham 1799 W Hacienda Ave 1801 W Hacienda Ave #3 1803 W Hacienda Ave Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 403 12 078 403 12096 403 12097 Rebecca Bowen Rossi Daniel & Pamela Dei Paul & Tram Koike 1805 W Hacienda Ave 1836 Regina Way 1846 Regina Way Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 403 12 101 403 12 102 403 12 103 Paul & Marita Boswell Larry & Jennifer Crerna Hamid Abtahi & Shahbaz Taheri 1771 W Hacienda Ave 1775 W Hacienda Ave 10650 S Tantau Ave Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 Cupertino,CA 95014 403 12 104 403 12 105 403 12 106 Gordon Steve & Sonja Epidendio John & Krista Lynch 1816 Regina Way 1830 Regina Way 1826 Regina Way Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 403 19004 403 19037 403 19038 Roy & Virginia Dickens Celia Romero Patrick Wong 1303 Freda Ct 2940 Del Lorna Dr 2928 Del Lorna Dr Campbell, CA 95008 San Jose, CA 95130 Campbell, CA 95008 403 19039 403 19040 403 19041 A L Nelson Candida Esquibel Axel Jonasson 2916 Del Lorna Dr 2904 Del Lorna Dr 1224 Weeping Oaks Ct Campbell, CA 95008 San Jose, CA 95130 San Jose, CA 95120 403 19074 403 19 109 403 19 110 Wylda Turstee Mason Zakhar & Tatyana Pesin Ke Zhao & Jennifer Wang 1291 Freda Ct 2901 Massih Ct 2907 Massih Ct Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 403 19 111 403 19 112 40319113 Sharon Summers Jacob & Bella Obolsky Gary & Kharon Yetta Goldberg 2913 Massih Ct 2919 Massih Ct 2966 Massih Ct San Jose, CA 95130 Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 403 19 114 403 19 116 403 45 023 Natalie Gelb Marilyn Healey Lucio Garcia 2960 Massih Ct 2948 Massih Ct 4766 Regina Way Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 403 45 024 403 45 025 403 45 026 Gregory & Joan Sease 01eg & Klinova Svetlana Marinovsky Hing-ling & Lolita Chow 4752 Regina Way 4738 Regina Way 4724 Regina Way Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 403 45 027 403 45 028 403 45 029 Katrin Karchegani Richard & Lisa Taylor Sr. Marlene Thornas 4710 Regina Way 4705 Del Lorna Ct 4715 Del Lorna Ct Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 403 45 030 40345031 403 45 032 Barry Garfield Kevin & Kathleen Mitchell Frederic & Gay Beville 4725 Del Lorna Ct 4735 Del Lorna Ct 4745 Del Lorna Ct Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 403 45 033 403 45 034 403 45 035 Patrick & Linda Haney Jr. Leo & Lily Adams Richard & Grace Bothne 4755 Del Lorna Ct 4765 Del Lorna Ct 4750 Del Lorna Ct Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 403 45 036 40345 037 403 45 038 Lamar & Della Gandy Bob Phung & Oanh Vu Renato Garcia & Lucila Degarcia 4740 Del Lorna Ct 4730 Del Lorna Ct 4720 Del Lorna Ct Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 403 45 039 403 45 040 40345041 Koji Ueda Lawrence Larder Susan Bajada 956 Saratoga Ave 4703 W Hacienda Ave 4715 W Hacienda Ave San Jose, CA 95129 Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 403 45 042 403 45 043 403 45 044 Stephan & Khim Mcnulty Yef1lIl & Dora Veytser Nobuyuki & Kyoko Muta 16388 Los Gatos Almaden Rd 4739 W Hacienda Ave 4751 W Hacienda Ave Los Gatos, CA 95032 Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 403 45 045 403 45 049 403 45 050 Gladys Jean-jacques Maria Guardado George & Edna Davilla 4700 San Jacinto Ave 151 Coventry Dr G Dennis Atascadero, CA 93422 Campbell, CA 95008 1687 Silacci Dr Campbell, CA 95008 40345051 403 45 052 403 45 055 George Parola David & Christine Markus Kenneth Robinson 825 Linden Dr 4712 W Hacienda Ave 3190 S Bascom Ave #200 Santa Clara, CA 95050 Campbell, CA 95008 San Jose, CA 95124 403 45 056 403 45 057 403 45 058 Richard & Glayds Walker Robyn Lahaie Kazuko Smith 4701 Regina Way 4709 Regina Way 4723 Regina Way Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 Campbell, CA 95008 403 19 115 Kamal AU & Mary Li u 2954 Massih Court Campbell, CA 95008 ill Iii l,j Iii Iii II! _ 0'> -2. ljl ~.,;",1 III ill IL lit "'10'2- l ~ -~1- II~HH -033 I: 'I -034- I -035 -o3~ -03/ -o3~ -03"1 -040 - C>.'-!(~'l - C?1] -105 - I 0 Co -l03 - lOLJ- - 0'5 -IOC -102- - ~8 ~o -ct7'D_ - OlD L, - 0(01 -009 ~,. II .1 t': I tl' If I t . i ! I ,~ I t I It 11 It lJo) - L<1d-_CO.4-. -01:1. -J2.tj.. -o?/f.. -o.?B -0'3 C>J ---:019 - lO1 to-ll ~ l{Q3-YS -9_t,lJ.. -060 -C)~I .-Oo_Z.,_", -01.Q_.,,_"'" -04-1 -04-2 -~3 -044- ,..,. - -- . -04-5 - <9_?-,3_ ~.... q~ C]". - 0-55 '...._.,_.,--~_....-.... ._..~..- - oS (; ......._..---_........._-- --,-. -,.. -oS+ -058 \~~~} ~ ~~o~. CA.1tP(9 !:: ~ u .... o 0 .. .... -s.", ~ 90~('H^"O'(. City of Campbell-- Community Development Department 70 N. First Street, Campbell, CA 95008 MEMORANDUM To: Site and Architectural Review Committee Date: October 11, 2005 From: Stephanie Willsey, Planner I S~ Subject: 1819 W. Hacienda Ave. - Two New Single-Family Homes PROPOSAL The project includes an application for a Zone Change from R-I-9 (Single-Family Residential) to P-D (planned Development), a Tentative Parcel Map for a two-lot subdivision, a Planned Development Permit for the construction of two single-family homes, and a Tree Removal Permit for the removal of six protected trees. The project site is located on the north side of West Hacienda Avenue between Harriet Avenue and Del Lorna Drive. The subject property is located on the San Jose/Campbell city border and is surrounded by townhomes to the east and south and single-family homes to the north and west. The townhomes to the south and single-family homes to the west are in the City of San Jose. The subject property is currently vacant. The zoning classification for the project site is R-I-9 (Single-Family Residential) and the General Plan Designation is Low-Medium Density (6-13 units per gross acre). The zoning designation and General Plan designation are currently inconsistent with each other as the General Plan designation allows a higher density than is allowed under the R-I-9 zoning designation. The corresponding zoning classification for the current General Plan designation is R-M (Multiple-Family Residential) or P-D. The proposed zoning classification change to P-D would bring the zoning classification and General Plan designation into conformance with each other. The proposed development of two single-family homes would result in a density of four units per gross acre, which is well below the allowable density under the General Plan. Based on a density calculation alone, six units could be accommodated on the property within the allowable density range of the General Plan. The San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan (ST ANP) requires that the minimum lot size for low density residential P-D projects be at least equal to the predominant minimum lot size requirement of parcels contiguous to, or directly across a public right-of-way from the subject site. In situations where no minimum lot size requirement is predominant, the Planning Commission and City Council shall determine the appropriate minimum lot size based on land use factors specific to the subject site. There is no predominant lot size surrounding the subject property. The property to the north is zoned R- 1-9 and is developed with a single-family home. The properties to the west are located in San Jose and area zoned R-I-8 (which is a residential zoning at a density of eight dwelling units per acre which results in a minimum lot size of 5,445 square feet) and are developed with single-family homes. The property to the south is located in San Jose and is zoned A(PD) with a maximum density of eight dwelling units per acre and is developed with an eight-unit townhome development. The property to the east is zoned P-D and is developed with an II-unit townhome development. Based on the surrounding zoning and developments, staff is recommending that the minimum lot size for this development be 8,000 square feet. Both of the proposed lots exceed 8,000 square feet. The proposed lot configuration would result in a lot fronting along West Hacienda Avenue and a rear flag lot. The street access (flag pole) for the rear flag lot is proposed along the eastern side of the property. A single- story home with a two-car garage is proposed on the front lot and a two-story home with a two-car garage is proposed on the rear flag lot. Site and Architectural Revit,.. Committee Meeting - October 11, 2005 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Page 2 of2 The proposed development includes a Tree Removal Permit application for the removal of six protected trees (five Incense Cedar trees and one Acacia tree). The trees proposed to be removed are located within the driveway of the home on Lot 'A' and the driveway for the home on Lot 'B'. A certified arborist prepared an arborist report for the project and identified all six trees as unhealthy and recommended that they be removed. The preliminary landscape plan shows the location for the six required replacement trees as well as many other trees and landscaping for the project. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff has worked with the applicant over the last year to make many significant architectural and site layout changes for a mutually beneficial project for the applicant as well as the City. Staff has no further recommended changes to the project. Attachments: Reduced Plans o'i; . c'\lI1 . ~<5> ~ {<' .... r- U r- .... 1-", .>.. "- ,,' o . RCH 1'\1." CITY OF CAMPBELL Community Development Department October 5, 2005 Re: PLN2004-1 09/11 0/111 & PLN2005-65 --1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Planned Development Dear Applicant: Please be advised that the above-referenced application has been scheduled for the following meeting(s): Site and Architectural Review Committee Meeting Date: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 Time: 7:10p.m. Location: Doetsch Conference Room, City Hall, 70 N. First Street, Campbell Planning Commission Meeting Date: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 Tim: 7:30p.m. Location: City Hall, Council Chambers, 70 N. First Street, Campbell, California Should you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at (408) 866- 2140. Sincerely, Sk{J1a-~ Wi I~ Stephanie Willsy Planner I cc: Hamid Adlparvar (Applicant) 327 S. Baywood Avenue San Jose, CA 95128 Jack Bates (Property Owner) 1425 Villa Drive Los Altos, CA 94024 70 North First Street, Campbell, California 95008-1436 ' TEL 408,866.2140 . FAX 408.866,8381 ' TOD 408.866.2790 0\ . CAIl1 ::.... /)-6> !::: ~ U r r- CAMPBELL .... :. 1- ^- ". ,-' OReHA"-'" L____.. \ t \ V CITY OF CAMPBELL Community Development Department September 13,2004 Mr. Jack Bates 1425 Villa Drive Los Altos CA, 94024 Re: Zone Change, Tentative Parcel Map & P-D Permit File No.: PLN2004-109, -110, -111 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Dear Mr. Bates: The Planning Division has reviewed your Zone Change, Tentative Parcel Map and Planned Development Permit application submittals for two new single-family homes on property located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue. Your applications have been deemed incomplete. The following information and details are needed to complete your applications and schedule your project for a public hearing: 1. Colored Elevation: Please provide a colored elevation for both proposed homes. 2. Proiect Board: Please provide a project board that contains actual samples of the exterior building materials and colors for each home. 3. Conceptual Landscape Plan: Please provide a conceptual landscape plan indicating existing and proposed landscaping. Show existing trees with a trunk diameter larger than four inches and indicate whether it will be removed or retained. The trunk diameter, tree drip line and species of the tree should be indicated. The San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan (STANP) requires that new developments provide a minimum of one tree per 2,000 square feet of net lot area. Existing trees may be included in this total. 4. Tentative Parcel Map: The following items need to be provided on the tentative parcel map: a. The dimensions of each property line for both lots. b. The species of each tree. c. Existing General Plan designation, which is Low to Medium Density Residential (6-13 units per gross acre), and the existing Zoning designation, which is R-I-9. d. The gross lot size (size oflot plus the flag pole area) and the net lot size (size of the lot minus the flag pole area) for Lot B. 5. Site Plan: The following items need to be provided on the site plan: a. The dimension of each property line for Lot A and Lot B. 70 North First Street. Campbell, California 95008-1436 TEL 408.866,1140 ' FAX 408,871,5140 ' TOD 408.866.1790 PLN2004-l09, -110, -111-1<.-_) W. Hacienda Avenue ~.~.,ge 2 of 2 b. The second floor building wall outline for the proposed home on Lot B. c. All proposed setbacks from property lines must be specified on the plans, not just the allowed building envelope because this is a P-D project. Please indicate first and second floor setbacks for the proposed home on Lot B. d. Indicate all existing and/or proposed fencing including the type, height, and materials. e. Provide the location and uses of the buildings on the adjacent properties. 6. Tree Removal Permit: The site plan shows the removal of four trees that are protected under the City's Tree Protection Regulations. The removal of these four trees will require approval of a Tree Removal Permit and they will need to be replaced with four 24-inch box replacement trees. Please complete and return the enclosed Tree Removal Permit application and show these required replacement trees on the conceptual landscape plan. There is a Tree Removal Permit application filing fee of$71 per tree. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact me at (408) 866-2193 or via email at stephaniew@cityofcampbell.com. Sincerely, .,,6ber&x~ W/'//~ Stephanie Willsey () Planner I End: Tree Removal Permit Application cc: GeoffBradley, Senior Planner Hamid Adlparvar, PCI Construction, Inc., 327 S. Baywood Avenue, San Jose, CA 95128 Bardia Khadiv, Khadiv Design, 1507 La Terrace Circle, San Jose, CA 95123 To: City Clerk Please collect and receipt For the following monies. ITEM 1. Maior, A. 5+ acre. - General Plan Amendment Zone Change Planned Development Pennit EIR Review B, 1-5 acres - General Plan Amendment Zone Change Planned Development Pennit EIR Review C. 0-1 acre General Plan Amendment Zone Change Planned Development Pennit EIR Review D. Initial StudylNegative Declaration 2. Minor: A. Subdivision Map ( 5+ lots) Site and Architectural Over lOK s.f. buildings Site and Architectural 5,001 to 10K s.f. buildings Tentative Parcel Map (4<lots) B, Site and Architectural 1-5,000 s.f. buildings Variance (non-residential) Use Pennits Massage Therapy Large Family Day Care All Others Commercial RemodeJ/No Additional Square Feet 3, Miscellaneous A, Variance (residential) Modifications of Approval Modification PD Pennit Reinstatements Revised Development Schedule Extensions of Time B. Site and Architectural (residential/each house) Minor Modifications to Side Yard Setback (residential) Signs (each sign) Additional Signs per business (filed at same time) Downtown (C-3 Zoning District) Sign Exceptions Freeway Oriented Signs Sign Programs (five or more signs) Sign Exception Fence Exception - Director Decisions Fence Exception - Planning Conunission Decisions Promotional Events Residential Remodel/ Addition/PD Pennit Single Family Residential Designated Landmark Alteration Tree Removal Pennit (non SFR) Additional Tree Removals (same pennit) Underground Utility Waiver Zoning Verification Leiter 4, Other: Architectural Advisor Fees (for each 90 minutes) Recording Fees - County Code Enforcement Categorical Exemptions Negative Declarations Appeal Filing Fee, ' Maps (color - quadrant) Maps (Color - full size) General Plan Text Zoning Code Text Copies (per page) Refundable Deposit - Account 2203 Fire Department Review - Account 01.303.4241 . Architectural Approval . Project Plan Review . Subdivision . CEQA Review Park Impact Fee - Account 295.535.4920 Tree Replacement In-Lieu Fees - Account 101.701.4971 For City Clerk Only: Receipt No,: Amount Paid: Received by: Date: PlanningFi1eNo~.. r~~L\~S ..-\~ ~. Address: \ __-'--~- ' t l ~ " ' " AMOUNT 10,205.00 10,170.00 12,185,00 Actual Cost + 20% Admin Overhead 8,525,00 8,465,00 9,590.00 Actual Cost + 20% Admin Overhead 6,845,00 6,588.00 7,460,00 Actual Cost + 20% Admin Overhead 4,500.00 5,285.00 6,740,00 4,725,00 3,445,00 3,225.00 3,916.00 1,376,00 1,376,00 2,751.00 3,123,00 1,305,00 1,878,00 1,878.00 2,205,00 2,205,00 2,205.00 3)l. 940.00 1,043,00 270.00 90,00 585,00 3,500.00 1,150.00 1,975,00 365,00 750.00 212.00 588.00 150,00 100,00 50,00 per tree 267,00 100.00 \~<6 RECEIVED AUG 3 0 2005 Exception for Major Projects: It is anticipated tha he applica exceed the above fees, In these cases, the Community process the applications based upon current hourly rates. processing costs of selected major projects will SignificanCln C.LERK'S. O_mOB ment Director may collect a deposit and charge actual time to 16.00 16,00 50,00 100,00 $2,50 x _ quadrants 30.00 55,00 23,00 1.00 I" pg/.1 Opp add'l Amount Varies 65.00 193.00 $129,00 +$10 per lot 359,00 Amount Varies Amount Varies 155,00 2s0 ~~O<f . CA4t/.)<S\ f:: ~ u r- o 0 .... .... 1- "- ~ <> 'O~CH""\l.Q' File No. _p~~- J1$ Date Filed <is ~ ~ City of Campbell, 70N. First Street, Campbell, CA 95008, (408) 866-2140 APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO REMOVE TREE(S) Trees on Private Property Only - Contact the Public Works Department for Street Trees or Trees on Publicly-Owned Property Name of Applicant /lan?J"J A dfpO;YIIOJ 0/ Applicant's Address 6.~ () Lo.5 14 J.i\J) Rc"".,cj" t.'> / Ins Subject Property Address J' ~ \ q '"' Ot C_j' (:J lfl dOl A" e . Name of Property Owner /I fl)Y>? J'cI ~ J I t/C'dva,f , Property Owner's Mailing Address GJ \0 /0 J /.J 140'> f! r71"1 c.. hv r Phone 65"0- Cfl..l- () - Cf Cjq 0 4 jlo:J , C A q~() l.'t Phone 6)0 ~q't ~ -qqq l/ LOJ ;1/k~/ LA q 4 0 z.y Tree Diameter (s) Reason for Removal Species of Tree(s) or Circumference Health of (Must meet criteria of Section (measured 4 ft. Tree(s) 21.56.080 of the Tree Protection above grade) Ordinance- see back page) i - - I : unheed~til - (j) ficA c..I ~ J.. Z II '{).. he~ \~ tr-u ~Cl~OI d'f'{Mj (-It) 1'1 ,<> ~ If'! ce~f~ II stre.soS e ct, tJV\~eft)\7' wI UC/Ar 15 Botrf('J.s p ~ a. n'iC1\ J ,".sePt ~<-. CAV'keX ~,'jutJt. P'e 011 e 01 js 17 5t!' t~~ ~*" che J f\rb<ly.rj .... r-~ro<t . SU~ITTAL REQUIREMENTS: [!f Color photographs of trees proposed for removal (depicting reason for requested removal); ~ Arborist Report prepared by an ISA Certified Arborist (including the appraised value of each tree) _/ International Society of Arboriculture Certification #-t "l1- - we (Required); [B" Jite Plan (See attached details); [ff'Tree Replanting Plan (See attached details); and, D Other information deemed necessary by the community development director to evaluate the tree removal request (to be determined on a case-by-case basis). Owner's Signature: Agent for Owner's Signature: Date: _ ~ Ill!) /0 J'- Date: l"1 '/p /p t- t. / ./ I , ( i I I I I l.+JJd II ~. It ~.f _. ..-+ (5 . I l~ lzl jl 1 ! J i I Iii i II ~ ] I I \ Ii \ I i I I 1:O.:e '6 .:e '6 l!t I 1"2 ~I I I ' ............... ~ III I ~ 81.2> \ -gl ! I ~II~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g 111 ~ ~I I ! ~ '8 ~ 1\! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - -: ! 4i( -8 -g \ I I \ ~ 1 ~ .2 ~ .g .g .l! .l! .g -0 '1 ~ I IZ\~~ \ jl!_ \g"8 {Ill.! -8 ~.~ I I 2 ..C'I J:J ~ ~i .8 i .. (S ~ 0 ~' 8- t;'......:t= CI:I Eo ~. c:c: ~ i i ~ ~\.~ .~ ! liji ! ~ij~ 11111 i ~ ~ ~ ~ i CI:I UJ t:: ..s c: "O~ >. >. a'" l.t: C5 C5 ~ ~ e Zl ~ 1;) .5 ~ ..H j~.~ ] ~ ~ ~J ~ ii u u i H 1 t 01 III \ I I I ~\ ~ \ \ \ ( II ' trli ~ I ~;J~\ ~1 ~I ~ ~j ~ ~ III ~ ~~, 1\l;~~1 ~ '": ii 10i jl.ilillU i i ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ i i ~.I-~ ~ J -~._.__.- i 2.~ .2I';IT- iN t.... t... t "It N N lI'l "It "It N N N N N l"') "It l"') "It "It l"') "It ..... 0<(1 :6]' II I II I I I I I' \ t' ! u'l 8 ,I I I I I -II U I ! ) ;! I t I I\l ~. . ~" r-r t.. i . -roo r-r-- .. '''r- ---- -..... -.- . - -. ...t-. -. ~ ~I :t;1 I 1 \ i \ , I ): I ,\I') ~ ~l.~~.~t.~~.~l~l~IJ,.~~. g i I.t i 'il! l!_~_~~g~lllj~~... _ ~ ~l ~I I (II I~I;I I I~ ~ 1~1~ I ~ LU _ Ivv\ I \ 1..0 l"')N I I CI.l > I . r I: t +1' + 1 :;: t I +:;: I: II I: II I: 11 + +. J ... 0<( , .~ Q N I: I: :;: I 0 I: !:;: I: .... 1..0 00 CIO CIO CIO CIO 11 I: I: I: I: 'lit I: E !111 .. C N NI,o:lr(riTI~[ i j- ~ ~; j.... j- ~ ; ~ ~I; "'rl..j. ~ ::t: CI:I I I , I \' :::J ~ 1 ~ .-. .- ~ CI:I c: I" I CJ c: I CI:I O'l .- CI:I I: I III a; II ~ ~ ~ I I 'i \ \ .m. -8 ~ .l!!, J!. \ .c. ~! ~ i:fi ~Ioiol i I qUHH ~ ~ ~ ~ t.HH1~1~.Mj!. ~~~~.sHHH ~ ;: !E i i jl i II ~.ftii-!~i I I .~ 15 em 0'0) \ \ u~~~~~~! I 5 ~ ~ J 10 8 81 101~1 ~ ~ I ~ ! ! ! 10 ~ ! '~ ~ j' ~ .~\ ...~ - N ~f) !~,jl'~~t~~ ! ;: ~ .. ~ "' "' ~ ~ ~ ! L !- .~ i -. , I 0 \ I....................................... N N N N 1 ' ,I' I ~ i I ..... ~\,.>\ "> ~ . ~ '" ~ ~ Q ~ ,. ~ :r ~ .~ ::t ~ \.., --s:: ) \.l '\ " ~ ~ ~ I..l ~ ~ ~ I\l '-..(\ "- .... s .., \J ~ ~ ~~ ......... ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ -. 'I.... It., '-..t::: ~1 .-- ',""- o ~ · CA.1t/.) ~~. ~ 1::: ~ U r- o 0 .4 .),. 1-(" ~ . v o . ~CH^~Q File No. "M1Do-I - \09 Development Application Planning Division 70 North First Street, Campbell, California 95008 (408) 866-2140 APN(S): 403 - I J- - 0 '),1 ZONING: R -I-q PROPERTY ADDRESS: DATE FILED: R! lB/o it GENERAL PLAN: I ~ I q W" l+a.cttflOlCl AVf6 TYPE OF APPLICATION(S): PROPERTY OWNER: ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: :Jo.ct.. Bak<; I ~~S" \,Iina M" !--oS A l-tos . C A , TELEPHONE: L~) q~ 8 ~ II J1 ZIP: q4D~4 Attach a separate sheet listing the names and addresses of others you wish to receive copies of staff reports and agendas. AFFIDA VIT/SIGNATURE(S): The undersigned person(s), having an interest in the above-described property, hereby make this application in accordance with the provisions of the Campbell Municipal Code; and, hereby certify that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my/our knowledge and belief. ~ ~ ~ .. ....' ' ............ ~'._" .ct" '" ........-; ~ . ">.J. 1.tit.l.o1- ~ ~ , ~~ ~ w 0 Ap~iit's 1~e- ' Date wn:~~s Signature Date NOTE: Staff is required_~y State Law to notify applicants of the completeness p/ their applications within 30 days. Only Applications, which are ymnd complete, will be placed on the Planning Co~ssion Agenda. / ' Zone Change Supplemental Application Page 2 PROJECT SUMMARY INFORMATION TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT ~ ptQro~d pn>Juf- WIl\ roql)l(f.. Q 7J)hi2- ~ Q;n~ t1-ovn Q-l-Cl 4-0 ~..D l p(OJl()erl dwVoffhU)f-:) ~<'~ G~ f2h.nnlYLfJ ~()WS #w5 ~5 a~ V....Pl'~. t<-q PJ) Requested Zone Change: Existing General Plan Designation: Proposed General Plan Designation: Surrounding Uses: North: Existing Zoning: Existing Use: . . t.f&.~L "~1>:~.:_. Proposed Zonirig:' , n. e~fde)[\"hat R-q Proposed Use: KP..s1 d en -h'[t,l South: RD East: 'P.D West: :) Qh J D~) IZ -&> ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Yes No 'I -L -L ~ --.::L --L -L ~ L -L- -.:L --L ~ RVSD. 6/11/03 1. Change in existing features of any lakes, hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours. 2. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. 3. Change in pattern, scale or character of the general area surrounding the project. 4. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 5. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. 6. Change in lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. 7. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. 8. Proposed development is on a filled site or on a slope of 10 percent or more. 9. Use of and/or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives. 10. Substantial change in the demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, etc.). 11. Substantial increase in the demand for fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). 12. Relationship to larger project or series of projects. 13. Additional traffic generation or parking demand. Zone Change Supplemental Application Page 3 Discuss below all of the above items checked yes. (Attach additional sheets as necessary) 14. Describe the project site as it exists, include information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site. t=:lar Q.Xn-f*cj lot- 5itvak.d In Q le&idU")-haj G'{eo.., a.t ~ \f)orru r h~ of ~ C.l.hj of l.GVV\-pk>.QJ\ a),w~1 ~an ~ . 15. Describe surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the intensity of land use and the scale of development (height, frontage, setbacks, etc.) ':2 ;>~,..~wnY)o()~s on ttu.., e..Q..2k and .5ou-\n 0\dD~ ( 'PD 7..Dn I~). On ~L V'lo'C-\-t) ~I~, u,~ ~~d;-~~~\~( ~q) R~~. Dr) ihR ~ ~\CtJ.) ,s0/'\ 0~ RVSD. 6/11103 ~~. o~. c%/.)~ !::: ~ U r- o 0 "" .).. 1-(" ~ . c., o . IlCH"'V-O Attachment C West Valley Sanitation District 4 Acknowledgment NOTICE TO APPUCANTS REGARDING EFFECT OF WASTE WATER TREATMENT CAPACITY ON LAND DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS PURSUANT TO DEVELOPMENT OF APN: Please take notice that no vested right to a building permit shall accrue as the result of the granting of any land development approvals and applications. Pursuant to the adoption of Ordinance 9.045 by West Valley Sanitation District 4, the agency providing the above described parcel(s) with sewer service, if the District's Manager and Engineer makes a determination that the issuance of a sewer connection permit to a building, or proposed building, on the above described property, will, in his opinion, cause the District to exceed its ability to treat adequately the waste water that would result from the issuance of such connection permit, then said permit may not be issued, and, hence, no building permit may be issued by this agency. If the sewer connection permit is issued, it may contain substantive conditions designed to decrease the waste water associated with any land use approval. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT By signing below, the applicant acknowledges, at the time of application, that he/she fully understands the above. ~ J2 ~ALT~.NOft A VF.. Address of Proposed Development Distribution Original to: West Valley Sanitation, District No.4 100 East Sunnyoaks Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 Copies to: File Applicant R vsd. 6/11103 Attachment D Contribution DisClosure Form Page 2 TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT 1. [1] IF CONTRIBUTIONS TOTALING $250 HA VB NOT BEEN MADE, CHECK HERE, AND SIGN BELOW IN SECTION Ill. II. TO BE COMPLETED ONLY IF CONTRIBUTIONS TOTALING $250 OR MORE HA VB BEEN MADE. NAME: ADDRESS: ZIP: TELEPHONE NO: LIST COMMISSION MEMBER(S) TO WHOM YOU AND/OR YOUR AGENT MADE CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TOTALING $250 OR MORE, AND THE DATES OF THOSE CONTRIBUTIONS. NAME: CONTRIBUTOR: (if other than yourself) DATE (S): AMOUNT (S): NAME: CONTRIBUTOR: (if other than yourself) DATE (S): AMOUNT (S): NAME: CONTRIBUTOR: (if other than yourself) DATE (S): AMOUNT (S): III. SIGNATURE DATE: !/!~I Rvsd.6/11103 ~.. o~ . CA4t.o~ f:: ~ U r o 0 ..... .... 1-... ::- . v Ol/CH""O. Attachment E Hazardous Waste & Substance Sites Disclosure Form This form must be completed by development applicants per the provisions of Government Code Section 65962.5. As part of the development application process, you must complete this disclosure form, certifying that you have reviewed the current CAL-EPA Department of Toxic Substances Control Facility Inventory Data Base Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List (available at the Planning Department, City of Campbell) and indicate below whether your project site is included on this list. Project Site Address:~L q k). t+a..LlQ..V\d.tL Ave I ~ pb.e.11 Proposed Project: ;) ~em s i ~le, - -fa.in l \ ~ hoh'VG 5> o Yes, the above-referenced site is included on the CAL-EP A Department of Toxic Substances Control Facility Inventory Data Base Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. 00 No, the above-referenced site is not included on the CAL-EP A Department of Toxic Substances Control Facility Inventory Data Base Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. Date fjl S/t1 ,f' Applicant Signature Please provide this completed form to the City f Campbell, Planning Department, 70 N. First Street, Campbell, CA 95008, together with the applic ion for development. R vsd. 6/11/03 o'i . CAIJt,o ,.i..~' ~ ~ ~ U l""" o 0 .. .lo, -s.~ ~ . (., Ol/CH^"O' File No. 1'lJ\)1a)4 - l \ 0 Tentative Parcel Map ~plication (Four Lots or Less) Planning Division 70 North First Street, Campbell, California 95008 (408) 866-2140 PROJECT ADDRESS: !'8lq C,) rlarAl(JX\dl2 /W€.-, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: '-103 - l~ -o~~ APPLICANT: SQ,cX <'F>c:d-c.-s ADDRESS: 14Q~ \1\1\0.. Dr CITY/STATE: \.-c:b AltDs \ CPr TELEPHONE: ((o..~) q4g - 1,11 ZIP: ~~Dd.4 FAX NUMBER: (~O) Q4'B--l"1 \/ CELL: ( EMAIL: TELEPHONE: (40~) q.4~ ~ 1111 ZIP: q.z.f o~ if TELEPHONE: ( ZIP: THE FOLLOWING ITEMS MUST BE WITH THIS APPLICATION: 1. FiJin!! Fee-$2,72O-receipt must be submitted to the Planning Department. 2. M!m-Ten (10) full-size copies (18"x26" folded to 8 W' x 11") and 15 reduced (11"xl7") copies. See Attachment A for items to be provided on plans. 3. 4. Preliminarv Title Reoort- two (2) copies Environmental Assessment-See Attachment B RC'~~m\nED ' '. ~~~tJ\~ AUG 1 8 2004 CITY OF CAMPBEll AFFIDAVIT/SIGNATURE(S): PLANNING DEPT. The undersigned person(s), having an interest in the above-described property, hereby make this application in accordance with the provisions of the Campbell Municipal Code; and, hereby certify that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my/our knowledge and belief. 5. Well Information Ouestionnaire-See yellow card 6. Sanitation District Acknowled!!ment Form-See Attachment C Engineer's Signature Date NOTE: Staff is required by State Law to notify applicants of the completeness of their applications within 30 days. Only those applications, which are found complete, will be processed. OFFICE USE ONLY Fee Paid: Completeness Letter: Receipt No: Final Action: Rvsd. 3/8/04 ~..o~.C%/.)~ 1:: ~ U l""" o 0 ... .).. -s- .... ~ c.,.... .OIlCHA~Q' PROJECT SUMMARY r- Tentative Map Attachment B Environmental Assessment INFORMATION TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT Zoning: K -l-q Proposed Use: ~e5' dllhj,al Number of Proposed Lots: d. Gross Site Size: ;;r~, ~ DeJt Surrounding Uses: North: East: l' J) General Plan Designation: 'P D Existing Use: _rq~l~ -tIll I Average Lot Size: q 1 000 ~. -fJ--. Net Site Size: ,4~()1..o ~f+. R-~ South: RD, SQYl "- , - l 1-- ';JQ~ , R-u West: Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Yes No ~ 1. -L 2. -L 3. -L 4. J- 5. -L 6. ~ 7. 8. 9. OX 10. - -L 11. ~ 12. -L 13. Change in existing features of any lakes, hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. Change in pattern, scale or character of the general area surrounding the project. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. Change in lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. Proposed development is on a filled site or on a slope of 10 percent or more. Use of and/or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives. Substantial change in the demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, etc.). Substantial increase in the demand for fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). Relationship to larger project or series of projects. Additional traffic generation or parking demand. Discuss below all of the above items checked yes. (Attach additional sheets as necessary) Rvsd.3/8/04 Tentative Map Environmental Assessment Page 2 ~ 14. Describe the project site as it exists, include information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site. r~~cl- S~ (n 0.. ~ON)-hQl QV~ ~ ~ ~:; h &!1j e>f- "~ ~ ~'5J2., 'hth C2 ~ '( - _~()~3 (")y) ~ OGSt ood <'Oil ~ 6\ruS. ( P.DZOY1lng)" 'D1 ~ V)Dv~ ~~L~~~&~~~)~R-q) Gnc\, D" ~ we&+S\~ ) ~_~ ,~~ 15. Describe surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the intensity of land use and the scale of development (height, frontage, setbacks, etc.) '( h' vs.e.s 0 00 16. Are there currently any other development applications associated with this property (i.e. Site and Architectural Review, Planned Developmem Permit, etc.)? If so, please list them. - ND R vsd. 3/8/04 ~.. o'i . CAItt/.i<Sl !::: ~ u r- o 0 .... ... ~ " ~ <.,' 'OIlCHj\\l~' Attachment C West Valley Sanitation District 4 Acknowledf{ment NOTICE TO APPLICANTS REGARDING EFFECT OF W ASTE WATER TREATMENT CAPACITY ON LAND DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS PURSUANT TO DEVELOPMENT OF APN: Please take notice that no vested right to a building permit shall accrue as the result of the granting of any land development approvals and applications. Pursuant to the adoption of Ordinance 9.045 by West Valley Sanitation District 4, the agency providing the above described parcel(s) with sewer service, if the District's Manager and Engineer makes a determination that the issuance of a sewer connection permit to a building, or proposed building, on the above described property, will, in his opinion, cause the District to exceed its ability to treat adequately the waste water that would result from the issuance of such connection permit, then said permit may not be issued, and, hence, no building permit may be issued by this agency. If the sewer connection permit is issued, it may contain substantive conditions designed to decrease the waste water associated with any land use approval. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ----- ' .^1-. ~ By signing below, the applicant acknowledges, at the time of application, that he/she fully understands the above. 1~/'f ilJe~'~lIDA Address of Proposed Development AVJ1, , Distribution Original to: West Valley Sanitation, District No.4 100 East Sunnyoaks Avenue Campbell, CA 95008 Copies to: File Applicant Rvsd. 1/28/2004 o~ · C%A ~.. ~ !:: ~ u r- o 0 A Jo. '1-(l' ~ . " O.fCH,.tlO' File No. 7LNZOO4- \ , \ Development Application " Planning Division 70 North First Strut, Campbell. California 95008 (408) 866.2140 At'N(S): ~ 03. \ ~ - 011 ZONING: K ~ I.q PROPERTY ADDRESS: I ~ j q W, TYPE OF APPLICA TION(S): DATE FILED: GENERAL PLAN: H aU tf(1GL A VI0 8[IB 104- APPLICANT: ;JaciL Bo.tts ADDRESS: ---H~$"vl\la J)r, CITY/STATE: \....Os A l+O~ I C A CELL: ( ) EMAIL: TELEPHONE: ((P~) QLJ8. 11'1 ZIP: q lfO:;l.4 FAX NUMBER: ((8)) Q4'6' J 1 j 7 PROPERTY OWNER: ADDRESS: CITY/STATE: Ju.ck Bok<. pol ~S" \J d \ Q J)y- , !.-Os Altos, C' A , TELEPHONE: !lt~) q4 8- i 1 n ZIP: 440::J4 Attach a separate sheet listing the names and addresses of others you wish to receive copies of staff reports and agendas. . ':, AFF1DA VIT/SIGNATURB(S): The undersigned person(s), having an interest in the above-described property, hereby make this application in accordance with the provisions of the Campbell Municipal Code; and, hereby certify that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my/our knowledge and belief. , ~ .~ 2~L . ~i~ ~"Si~ ~I::q NOTE: Staff is required ~y State Law to notify applicants of the completeness,J th;; applications within 30 days. Only Applications, which are J6und complete, will be placed on the Planning Col1lJl1ission Agenda. " Planned Development Permit Supplemental Application Page 2 PROJECT SUMMARY INFORMATION TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT Zoning: R - I - 9 Proposed Use: 1< ~~ I d V j()-tLaJ Gross Floor Area: Lot r\ No. of Stories: I L-ot-k Lot Coverage: Surrounding Uses: North: East: General Plan Designation: ----E..D Existing Use: Re~idQ.,Y\'ha j\ Floor Area Ratio: LotB Let ^ Let ~ ~ Net Lot Size: i-<>t6 Lot- .+ Lot 8 Parking Spaces Provided: ~ ~ L-ot-A LDt- B l-ot- It- ~ Pavement Coverage: Landscape Coverage: f<. Q-S ( c\.QN1-h a1 RV'~ i ciQ,v\, 110. \ \<es f ~'htd '\{Q.s l'd.e~ 'e..1 ~ West: South: ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Yes No ~1. ~2. J=t3. 4. ~5. _6. L7. -L/8. ~9. ~o. -L 11. ~2 13. Change in existing features of any lakes, hills, or substantial alteration of ground contours. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. Change in pattern, scale or character of the general area surrounding the project. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. Change in lake, stream or ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. Proposed development is on a filled site or on a slope of 10 percent or more. Use of and/or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives. Substantial change in the demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, etc.). Substantial increase in the demand for fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). Relationship to larger project or series of projects. Additional traffic generation or parking demand. Discuss below all of the above items checked yes. (Attach additional sheets as necessary) RVSD. 6/11103 Planned Development Permit Supplemental Application Page 3 14. Describe the project site as it exists, include information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site. Flat- Q~j lot .sl~.-A fn a vP'bide.xYha ~ QYlZo... ~ +fnP.... 'ooYd.ev- \\V\QJ 6f- 'fkL ~ OT ('(}.lMfh~\\ aVId &n ~. 15. Describe surrounding properties, including information on plants and animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the intensity of land use and the scale of development (height, frontage, setbacks, etc.) . h hoo~ V) , 8~'~ \ ~ ~-r~ (_~$ ~ ~-~ \ . J RVSD. 6111/03 " Planned Development Permit Attachment A Page 3 PROJECT SUMMAJtY Assess'ors Parcel Number: ~ () ~ Lot Size: ::r~ ) 4() <0 Gross sq. ft. (Property to center line of street) '9 /.}oU> Net sq. ft. l...'* A q,oo'iS sub dw}chn~ one. lot into two ~o~'. Lot- -e> lo\~q~ Utilization: Sq. ft. Percent % Building Coverage l,..ot fr l.-of 5 ~t It (include cantilever portions) ~l \5'3 3p~ 35 5' Jot") 4,581 Cao L{.!5o ::2) '"100 5 l::l . ~ 0 'Ji Landscape Coverage Paving Coverage Floor Area Ratio: Lo+A- 315 \..l>+~ 3D Total building sq. ft. divided by net lot size Adiacent Land Uses North South East West Use R-I 'K -I 'R -I 'K-l Zoning: 'R-l-q YD 'PD ~~\-(P Parking Standard Compact Handicap TOTAL Restaurant and Assembly Uses Seating Count Residential Proiects Unit Type Living Area Garage Area Total Area A B C No. of Bedrooms Number of Units Rvsd.6/11/03 k>+~ 30 44 ~(p ~~. o~ · CA4tA($) 1:: ~ U r- o 0 "'" ~ 1-<" .!: . V OIlCH^\l.Q' Attachment C West Valley Sanitation District 4 Acknowledgment NOTICE TO APPUCANTS REGARDING EFFECT OF WASTE WATER TREATMENT CAPACITY ON LAND DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS PURSUANT TO DEVELOPMENT OF APN: ~03 -I~- o~ Please take notice that no vested right to a building permit shall accrue as the result of the granting of any land development approvals and applications. Pursuant to the adoption of Ordinance 9.045 by West Valley Sanitation District 4, the agency providing the above described parcel(s) with sewer service, if the District's Manager and Engineer makes a determination that the issuance of a sewer connection permit to a building, or proposed building, on the above described property, will, in his opinion, cause the District to exceed its ability to treat adequately the waste water that would result from the issuance of such connection permit, then said permit may not be issued, and, hence, no building permit may be issued by this agency. If the sewer connection permit is issued, it may contain substantive conditions designed to decrease the waste water associated with any land use approval. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT By signing below, the applicant acknowledges, at the time of application, that he/she fully understands the above. l tJ/1 1+ A{'~ e;r()A- AJI P', Address of Proposed Development b r5 Date Distribution Original to: West Valley Sanitation, District No.4 100 East Sunnyoaks A venue Campbell, CA 95008 Copies to: File Applicant Rvsd.6/11/03 Attachment D Contribution Disclosure Form Page 2 TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT I. [/ IF CONTRIBUTIONS TOTALING $250 HA VB NOT BEEN MADE, CHECK HERE, AND SIGN BELOW IN SECTION ill. il. TO BE COMPLETED ONLY IF CONTRIBUTIONS TOTALING $250 OR MORE HA VB BEEN MADE. NAME: ADDRESS: ZIP: TELEPHONE NO: LIST COMMISSION MEMBER(S) TO WHOM YOU AND/OR YOUR AGENT MADE CAMPAIGN CONTRmUTIONS TOTALING $250 OR MORE, AND THE DATES OF THOSE CONTRIBUTIONS. NAME: CONTRIBUTOR: (if other than yourself) DATE (S): AMOUNT (S): NAME: CONTRIBUTOR: (if other than yourself) DATE (S): AMOUNT (S): NAME: CONTRIBUTOR: (if other than yourself) DATE (S): AMOUNT (S): III. SIGNATURE DATE: Jt'(J!3~5 Rvsd.6/11103 o~ . C%/.l ~.. <9 !::: ~ U r o 0 .. "- oS-... v~ Attachment E . OI/CH"\l.O' Hazardous Waste & Substance Sites Disclosure Form This form must be completed by development applicants per the provisions of Government Code Section 65962.5. As part of the development application process, you must complete this disclosure form, certifying that you have reviewed the current CAL-EPA Department of Toxic Substances Control Facility Inventory Data Base Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List (available at the Planning Department, City of Campbell) and indicate below whether your project site is included on this list. Project Site Address: 1~/1 )J)C;$dfJft A VF'. Proposed Project: o Yes, the above-referenced site is included on the CAL-EP A Department of Toxic Substances Control Facility Inventory Data Base Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. 0' No, the above-referenced site is not included on the CAL-EP A Department of Toxic Substances Control Facility Inventory Data Base Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List. Applicant Signature ~ ~ Please provide this completed form to the City of Campbell, Planning Department, 70 N. First Street, Campbell, CA 95008, together with the application for development. Date Lt1/1j/,!~ Rvsd.6/11/03 To; Cip--'"'erk Pit ,ollect and receipt For r.:.... following monies. ITEM 1. Maior. A. 5+ acres - General Plan Amendment Zone Change Planned Development Pennit EIR Review B. 1-5 acres- General Plan Amendment Zone Change Planned Development Pennit EIR Review C. 0-1 acre General Plan Amendment Zone Change Planned Development Pennit EIR Review D. Initial Study/Negative Declaration 2. Minor; A. Subdivision Map (5+ lots) Site and Architecturall 0,000+ square feet Tentative Parcel Map (4<lots) B. Site and Architectural 0-10,000 square feet Variance (non-residential) Use Pennit Commercial Remodel/No Additional Square Feet 3. Miscellaneous A. Variance (residential) Modifications of Approval Modification PD Pennit Reinstatements Revised Development Schedule Extensions of Time B. Site and Architectural (residential/each house) Minor Modifications to Side Yard Setback (residential) Signs (each sign) Sign Program Sign Exception Fence Exception Promotional Events Residential Remodel/Addition/PD Pennit Single Family Residential Designated Landmark Alteration Tree Removal Pennit (non SFR) Underground Utility Waiver Zoning Verification Letter 4. Other; Appeal Filing Fee Maps (color - quadrant) Maps (Color- full size) General Plan Text (After 2001 Update Adopted) Zoning Code Text Copies (per page) Refundable Deposit - Account 2203 Fire Department Review - Account 01.303.4241 · Architectural Approval · Project Plan Review . Subdivision · CEQA Review Park Impact Fee - Account 295.535.4920 Tree Replacement In-Lieu Fees - Account 101.701.4971 For City Clerk Only; Receipt No.; Amount Paid; Received by: Date; .. ~Ianning File ij(l;,~~ -~ -II' Address: \"6\ W . t'\11r f ~ AMOUNT 9,373.00 9,373.00 10,043.00 11,943.00 7,725.00 7,725.00 7,771.00 9,965.00 5,356.00 5,356.00 5,124.00 7,983.00 3,167.00 4,295.00 4,285.00 2,802.00 3,368.00 2,688.00 2,575.00 2,839.00 2,688.00 1,823.00 1,823.00 1,514.00 1,514.00 1,818.00 484.00 427.00 262.00 788.00 1,700.00 262.00 206.00 242.00 143.00 71.00 183.00 60.00 100.00 $2.50 x _ quadrants 29.00 46.00 23.00 1.00 1st pg/.l Opp add'l Amount Varies 63.00 187.00 $125.00 +$10 per lot 349.00 Amount Varies Amount Varies ~~o~.r'~~ 9-J~dl . oC) , 45.00 RECEIVED AUG 1 8 2004 Note; Adopted on 4/20/04 by Campbell City Council Resolution No. 10319, effective 7/1/04. Exception for Major Projects; It is anticipated that the application processing costs of selected major X\~'\~fts wi~~~f~~, \1 exceed the abo~e f~es. In these cases, the Community Development Director may collect a6titVt ~tiRW",l\!JttttVl1! process the applIcations based upon current hourly rates. . . +- 0"" . CAIl1 . ~<9 t- (<' ..... t'" U r -. CAMPBELL .-'. '- 1- "- C' '-,' ORCHA"-O' CITY OF CAMPBELL / ... .', u Community Development Department May 23,2005 Mr. Hamid Adlparvar 630 Los Altos Rancho Shopping Center Los Altos CA, 94024 Re: Zone Change, Tentative Parcel Map, P-D Permit & Tree Removal Permit 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Dear Mr. Adlpatvar: The Planning Division has reviewed your Zone Change, Tentative Parcel Map and Planned Development Permit application submittals for two new single-family homes on property located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue. Your applications have been deemed incomplete. The following information and details are needed to complete your applications and schedule your project for a public hearing: 1. Proiect Board: Please provide a project board that contains actual samples of the exterior building and roof materials/colors for each home. 2. Conceptual Landscape Plan: Please revise the conceptual landscape plan to include the following: a. Reduce the width of paving along the driveway for Lot B to 12 feet and provide three feet of landscaping along the eastern side of the driveway. Please utilize a decorative paving material for this long driveway or at the entrance of the driveway. b. Indicate the correct size and species of each tree on both lots and which ones are to be removed, and retained per the arborist report. The arborist recommends the removal of six protected trees that are in poor condition and staff recommends that you follow the arborists' recommendations. c. The City's Tree Protection Regulations require that each protected tree to be removed must be replaced with a 24-inch box replacement tree. Please indicate the species, size and location for the six replacement trees. d. Indicate all existing and/or proposed fencing including the type, height, and materials. 3. Preliminary Grading & Drainage Plan: Please revise the preliminary grading and drainage plan to include the following: a. Revise the preliminary grading and drainage plan to reduce the amount of grading and fill on the site. Revise the elevations to correspond to the revised grading plan. b. Reduce the width of paving along the driveway for Lot B to 12 feet and provide three feet of 70 North First Street, Campbell, California 95008-1436 ' TEL 408,866.2140 . FAX 408.871.5140 ' TOO 408.866.2790 ~... ~-..^ 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Page 2 of2 landscaping along the eastern side of the driveway. C. Provide a correct north arrow. 4. Site Plan: The following items need to be provided on the site plan: a. Indicate the correct size and species of each tree on both lots and which ones are to be removed and retained per the arborist report. The arborist recommends the removal of six protected trees that are in poor condition and staff recommends that you follow the arborists' recommendations. b. Lot B - Reduce the width of paving along the driveway for Lot B to 12 feet and provide three feet of landscaping along the eastern side of the driveway. Please utilize a decorative paving material for this long driveway or at the entrance of the driveway. c. Lot B - All proposed setbacks from property lines on all sides must be specified on the plans, not just the allowed building envelope because this is a P-D project. 5. Elevations: The following items need to be provided on the elevations: a. Lot A & Lot B - Revise the elevations to show a reduction in the height of finished grade closer to the height of natural grade, per the revised preliminary grading and drainage plan. b. Lot A - Make the front porch pillars more proportional. C. Lot B - Use frosted glass for the all the bathroom windows on the sides and rear of the second floor of the home and indicate this on the plans. d. Lot B - Consider removing the second floor hallway window on the right elevation and replacing it with a skylight to help reduce the amount of privacy impacts to the adjacent neighbors. Additionally, consider using a high set window for the stairwell on the right elevation that will allow light in but will have less of a privacy impact. e. Lot B - Show where the two fireplaces will vent in the roof. Staff recommends that if the roof vent is on the front of house that it be enclosed in a standard fireplace flu and cap. 6. Tree Removal Permit: The removal of protected trees will require approval of a Tree Removal Permit and they will need to be replaced with 24-inch box replacement trees. Please complete and return a Tree Removal Permit application and show the required replacement trees on the conceptual landscape plan. There is a Tree Removal Permit application filing fee of$7l per tree. If you have any questions regarding these comments, please contact me at (408) 866-2193 or via email at steuhaniew@cityofcamubell.com. Sincerely, ~ lAJt \l Stephanie Willsey ~ Planner I - o~ . CAt1t,o ~. . . ~ !::: ..~ u . r- "- " ,> O/\'CH J\R'O. CITY OF CAMPBELL Community Development Department - Current Planning March 18,2004 Mr. Jack Bates 1425 Villa Drive Los Altos, CA 94024 Re: Preliminary Application Comments File No.: PRE2004-00010 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue Dear Mr. Bates: Thank you for your submittal of a preliminary application for a Zone Change and Tentative Parcel Map for the property located at 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue. The subject property is presently zoned R-1-9 (Single-Family Residential, minimum 9,000 square foot lot size) and is designated as Low-Medium Density Residential (6-13 units per gross acre) on the City's General Plan Land Use Map. The property is located within the San Tomas Neighborhood and is therefore subject to the development standards and design guidelines of the San Tomas Area Neighborhood Plan (STANP). The proposed project will require the following three application approvals which can be processed concurrently and will require approval from the Planning Commission and City Council through the public hearing process: 1. Zone Change: Your project description requests a zone change from R-1-9 to R-1-6. However, this would be considered "spot zoning" which is not allowed. The proposed project would require a Zone Change from R-1-9 to P-D (Planned Development) in order to allow the creation of two lots that are less than the 70 feet wide and 9,000 square feet in area, which is the minimum requirements in the R-1-9 zoning district. 2. Tentative Parcel Map: In order to develop the property with two homes, the project will require the approval of a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide the property into two individual lots. 3. Planned Development Permit: The project will also require the submittal of a Planned Development Permit for the construction of two homes. An application for a Zone Change to the P-D zoning district requires the concurrent submittal of a specific development plan for the properties. The Planned Development permit approves the site plans, elevations, floor plans and landscape plan. The proposed homes should follow the development standards of the R-1-9 zoning district (i.e. setbacks, lot 70 North First Street ' Campbell, California 95008-1436 . TEL 408,866.2140 . FAX 408.866.8381 ' TOD 408,866.2790 -..... PRE2004-0001O-1819",. .iaciendaAvenue Page 2 of2 coverage, FAR) and the design guidelines contained in the STANP in order to make the proposed homes compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The Planning Division has the following additional comments regarding your proposal: 1. Driveways: The project description indicates the desire to have a shared driveway for the two homes. However, staff is not supportive of a shared driveway for two single- family homes. A shared driveway is a desirable feature for townhome or multi-unit developments that require vehicular access to one property by many residents. In this case though each home should have its own driveway on its own property. 2. Tree Preservation: The development site appears to have some large, mature trees. All trees on site must be indicated on your site plan and note the type, size, and note whether such tree is proposed to be removed or preserved. The City has Tree Protection Regulations which require that any protected trees that are healthy and can be accommodated on site with a proposed development should be preserved. It is recommended that to the extent possible, you preserve the existing trees on site to better integrate the new project with the rest of the neighborhood. As part of your formal applications, a complete conceptual landscape plan will be required. Any protected trees that are proposed to be removed as part of this project will require approval of a Tree Removal Permit. Your application was distributed to the Public Works Department, Building Division, Planning Division and County Fire Department. In addition to the Planning Division's comments contained in this letter, please find enclosed comments from the Public Works Department and the County Fire Department. Please note that these comments are meant to be preliminary. Conditions of approval from each department will be developed when the formal applications are submitted. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (408) 866-2193 or via email at stephaniew@cityofcampbell.com to schedule a meeting to discuss these comments or the application process. Sincerely, s~ Witl8ru-- Planner I (J End: Public Works Department Comments, 3/16/04 Fire Department Comments, 3/15/04 cc: Geoff Bradley, Senior Planner DCI Construction, Inc., Hamid Adlparvar, 327 S. Baywood Avenue, San Jose, CA 95128 MEMORANDUM CITY OF CAMPBELL TO: Stephanie Willsey, Project Planner DATE: 03/16/04 FROM: Ed Arango, Associate Engineer~: SUBJECT: DRC APPLICATION Site Address: 1819 W. Hacienda Avenue For File No(s): PRE 2004-010 Project Description: Tentative Parcel Map for 2-10t subdivision Applicant: Jack Bates PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PRELIMINARY CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Tentative Parcel Map: The applicant shall submit a complete and accurate tentative parcel map in accordance with the Planning Division's checklist. The current application processing fee is $2,720.00. 2. Parcel Map: Prior to issuance of any building permits for the project, the applicant shall submit a parcel map for recordation upon approval by the City. The current plan check fee is $2,400 plus $35 per lot. 3. Preliminary Title Reoort: Upon submittal of the tentative map, the applicant shall provide a current Preliminary Title Report. 4. Monumentation for Parcel Map: Prior to recordation of the parcel map, the applicant shall provide security for setting all monuments shown on the map. 5. Street Improvements: Upon recordation of the parcel map, the applicant shall execute a street improvement agreement, cause plans for public street improvements to be prepared by a registered civil engineer, pay various fees and deposits, post security and provide insurance necessary to obtain an encroachment permit for construction of the standard public street improvements, as required by the City Engineer. The plans shall include the following: a. Removal of the existing pavement structural section and installation of new pavement structural section to centerline, or as required by the City Engineer. b. Installation of City standard curb, gutter, sidewalk and ADA compliant driveway approach. c. Installation of City approved street trees at 40 feet on center. d. Construction of conforms to existing public and private improvements, as necessary. 6. Occupancy: Prior to allowing occupancy for any and/or all buildings, the applicant shall have the required street improvements installed and accepted by the City. J :\LandDev\Conditions\Hacienda 1819 Pre.DOC Page 1 of2 1819 Hacienda Avenue 7. Water Meter(s) and Sewer Cleanout(s): Existing and proposed water meter(s) and sewer cleanout(s) shall be relocated or installed on private property behind the public right-of- way line. 8. Soils Report: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, applicant shall provide a soils report prepared by a registered geotechnical or civil engineer. 9. Utilities: All new on-site utilities shall be installed underground per Section 20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code for any new or remodeled buildings or additions. Applicant shall comply with all plan submittals, permitting, and fee requirements of the serving utility companies. 10. Utilitv Coordination Plan: Prior to issuance of building permits for the site, the applicant shall submit a utility coordination plan and schedule for approval by the City Engineer for installation and/or abandonment of all utilities. Streets that have been resurfaced within the previous five years will require boring and jacking for all new utility installations. Applicant shall also prepare pavement restoration plans for approval by the City Engineer prior to any utility installation or abandonment. 11. Grading and Drainage Plan: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits for the site, the applicant shall conduct hydrology studies based on a ten-year storm frequency, prepare an engineered grading and drainage plan, and pay fees required to obtain necessary grading permits. The plans shall comply with th~ 1998 edition of the California Building Code including Chapters 10, 11, 18,33, and Appendix Chapter 33. 12. Storm Drain Area Fee: Prior to recordation of the parcel map/final map, the applicant shall pay the required Storm Drain Area fee of $2,000.00 per net acre, which is $900.00. 13. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Measures: Prior to issuance of any grading or building permits, the applicant shall comply with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements, Santa Clara Valley Water District requirements, and the Campbell Municipal Code regarding stormwater pollution prevention. The primary objectives are to improve the quality and reduce the quantity of stormwater runoff to the bay. Resources to achieve these objectives include Stormwater Best Management Practices Handbook for New Development and Redevelopment ("CA BMP Handbook") by the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA), 2003; Start at the Source: A Design Guidance Manual for Stormwater Quality Protection ("Start at the Source") by the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association (BASMAA), 1999; and Using Site Design Techniques to Meet Development Standards for Stormwater Quality: A Companion Document to Start at the Source ("Using Site Design Techniques") by BASMAA, 2003. 14. Demolition: Prior to recording of the final map/parcel map the applicant shall obtain a demolition permit and remove any nonconforming structures. J :\LandDev\Conditions\Hacienda 1819 Pre. DOC Page 2 of 2 --. FIRE DEPARTMENT SANTA CLARA COUNTY PLAN REVIEW NUMBER 04 0479 BLOG PERMIT NUMBER 14700 Winchester Blvd., Los Gatos, CA 95032-1818 (408) 378-4010 · (408) 378-9342 (fax) · www.sccfd.org CONTROL NUMBER FILE NUMBER PRE2004-00010 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMENTS CODElSEC. I SHEET FI REQUIREMENT Review of a proposed Zoning Change from R-1-9 to P-D and a Tentative Parcel Map for a 2-lot residential subdivision. UFC 903.2 1 Review of this Developmental proposal is limited to acceptability of site access and water supply as they pertain to fire department operations, and shall not be construed as a substitute for formal plan review to determine compliance with adopted model codes. Prior to performing any work the applicant shall make application to, and receive from, the Building Department all applicable construction permits. 2 Required Access to Water Supply (Hydrants): Portions of the structure(s) are greater than 150 feet of travel distance from the centerline of the roadway containing public fire hydrants. Provide an on-site fire hydrant OR, provide an approved fire sprinkler system throughout all portions of the building. This condition may be appropriate to the Lot B and will be assessed upon future submittals. No fire department conditions of the proposed zoning change and Tentative Map. . City PLANS SPECS NEW RIIIDL AS CBL 0 OCCUPANCY CONST. TYPE I ApplIC8lllName I JACK BATES DATE PAGE SECJFLOOR o ODD 1AR9 3/15/2004 ~ OF~ LOAD DESCRIPTION BY NAME OF PROJECT Residential Development I LOCATION 1819 Hacienda Av Organized as the Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District Serving Santa Clara County and the communities of Campbell, Cupertino, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Morgan Hill, and Saratoga Hokanson, Wayne - ~~.O~.CA~..o~ !::: ~ U r- o 0 .... ~ '5- .... ~ "'..... 'OIlCHAv..'V' FileNo. f-Rf-ZOolf-1 0 Pre-Application Review Application Planning Division - 70 North First Street, Campbell, California 95008 - (408) 866-2140 APN(S): ZONING: tfO"3 -I~- O~, A-I-q DATE FILED: GENERAL PLAN: low,:=: nJ RdJ ~.Dtn:).~Cle,n:ta.l AveJ PROPERTY ADDRESS: l-b Iq LV, HariVYlda.. TYPE OF APPLICATION: APPLICANT: ~ a.ct. 'F1o..tcs ADDRESS: 14~S Vil\a. Vr, CITY/STATE: Los AI~. cA CELL: ( EMAIL: TELEPHONE: (t.b6) q4~- 11/1 ZIP: q4 0 ;)-4 FAX NUMBER: (L.{o1>) q4~.~ /1 '7 PROPERTY OWNER: .J ac..t. P:ak.s ADDRESS: 14aS" V ilia c:Dr. CITY/STATE: l-os AHas CA , TELEPHONE: (~~)q4~-1117 ZIP: q 40 'J!f AFFIDA VIT/SIGNA TURB(S): The undersigned person(s), having an interest in the above-described property, hereby make this application in accordance with the provisions of the Campbell Municipal Code; and, hereby certify that the information given herein is true and correct to the best of my/our knowledge and belief. '~~ // " R vsd, 9/22/03 "REQUEST FOR ZONING CHANGE" - FOR PROPERTY LOCA TED AT: 1819 W. HACIENDA A VE. CITY OF CAMPBELL, CA. The following described Project Plan is respectively submitted for your review & consideration. It is my understanding that this project will require a zoning change from R-9 to R-6, (Zoning Map) but conforms to the City of Campbell, General Plan Diagram. PLANS: Exhibit A - Plan View of Project Exhibit B _ Proposed Site Plan Exhibit C _ Neighborhood Site Plan Exhibit D _ City of Campbell General Plan Diagram Exhibit E _ City of Campbell Zoning Map Exhibit F _ Neighborhood Approval Signatures Prooosed Use: This project is based upon a design configuration that includes the construction of two, custom homes on a front lot that has 2800 square feet and a rear pocket lot that has 2700 square feet. Both lots will share a common driveway. Supportive Factors for the Proiect: 1. The refusal of this zoning change would be counter to the "Land Use Designation indicated on the City of Campbell General Plan Diagram objectives of the Zoning Ordinance. Strict interpretation and enforcement of these regulations will result in non-development of a property that is 2 to 3 times the size of residential lots surrounding the Project Lot. Examples: a) Lot is surrounded by low density zoning (6-13 units - City of Campbell- General Plan diagram SIW Quad) b) The Project Lot is the last lot on the Campbell/San Jose interface along Hacienda Drive. c) The potential to improve the neighborhood housing values and overall asthetic appeal offered by such a project would be obviated. Additionally, the size of the 2 lots will generally exceed the home lot square footage of properties surrounding the lot in question. This is particularly true for homes/condominiums along Del Lorna Dr. and Hacienda drive to the east and south of the Project lot. 2. There are exceptional circumstances applicable to the property which do not generally apply to other properties classified in the same zoning district. ResDonse: The property immediately East of the Project Lot is a multi-unit, multi-level, condominium property. (Located in the City of Campbell zoning.) The property immediately south of the Project Lot is also a multi-unit, multi-level, condominium property. (Located in the City of San Jose zoning) 3. Strict interpretations and enforcement of the specified regulation would deprive the applicant of privileges enjoyed by the owners of other properties classified in the same zoning district. ResDonse: Three properties along Regina Way have pocket lots similar to the Project Lot with beautiful, neighborhood enhancing, custom homes built on the lots. These homes are of relatively new construction and have markedly higher market value approaching or exceeding $1 Million. These properties raise the standard of the area and are a major improvement to the neighborhood. This is exactly what would/could be done on the Project Lot as spelled out in the Plan View. 4. The granting of the zoning change will not constitute a grant of special privilege inconsistent with the limitations on other properties classified in the same zoning district. ResDonse: To our knowledge, this lot is the only one of its size remaining in the contingent block area Other lots of this size have already been subdivided into two lots with beautiful custom homes on them. 5. The granting of the zoning change will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or materially injurious to properties or improvements in the vicinity Resoonse: Granting of this zoning change will result in the construction of two custom homes that meet all construction code requirements & specifications, supported by appropriate inspections that are currently in force. Accordingly, enforcement of applicable codes will ensure that the project will conform to public health, safety or welfare policy and will not be injurious to properties or improvements in the area. Further, the completion of this project will undoubtedly exceed the requirements that governed the construction policy of 90% of the homes built in the immediate area. In the block area in questio~ a personal inspection of the contingent properties would seem to indicate that the double lots with custom homes in the front and back are of construction requirements that are of a recent period. (i.e. 2000 - 2004) Factors that may favor the approval of our request for applicable zoning change. 1. The project design features the sharing of a common driveway to both lots. This could alleviate any encumbrance a narrower driveway to the rear lot might provide. 2. Subject lot is 19,406.4 square feet. 3. Lot A is 9000 square ft. (65' X 138') 4. Lot B (the rear lot) is 10,406.4 square ft.) 5. Lots A & B will share a common driveway. 6. Lot is situated among R-I-3 and R-I-6 zoned homes. 7. The Project Lot is the last lot on the Campbell/San Jose interface line. 8. The R-I-610t zoning properties are located directly across the street and are in San Jose. 9. The Plan includes the following improvements: a) Sidewalks b) Curb & gutter We recognize the consideration that you extend to us through the review of this project and appreciate very much your willingness to support the approval of the zoning change requested. Your support will result in a major improvement of the fmallarge lot interfacing the City Campbell and the City of San Jose properties. _ee.' January 16,2004 Dear Neighbors, J \~B ./" Weare petitioning The City of Campbell to demolish the e . ing worn down house at 1819 W. Hacienda Ave., Campbell and s -divide the property into two lots. The front lot to be 9,000 sq. d the rear lot to be 10,406 sq. ft. Once it is subdivided into two lots, e are planning on building two new custom hom~tf~Pfoxtrt;~lmy ,200-3,500 sq. ft. each. The completion of this project wIll improve the appearance of the immediate area and I anticipate that your property values will be positively affected as well. Because the City of Campbell's Planning Dept. may require a variance for this project, we would appreciate your support with a signature below. In signing this, I support the petition to sub-divide the property at 1819 W. Hacienda Ave., Campbell. ~A.1\WEYN ~J:.U- '( Name I ~OS- J+~d.A ~. ~,,~{J cA--CfS'ooy Address s,.\I:."-S'{ \.I\~'" \..0 <...l'. Name Address tl.A'Le Lv e->T,^Aw Name '-0.07 N\fi6'S'H CT I CAM~fL..L.) CA CffOO8' Address ~-\~Rb~ ~\l~1II\t:.~> ~91 ~ ...,~W <.-T. Name Address \\ " G QV'7 Q..o/db~~ Name ~1'~' f'1qJ./,.J. Cf;- c.:t#f;tbkll c,f f'/DoB Address I K.AmAl. 1l~1 Name Zffy ~AtS114 c1. CA~f86LL CA '~o08 Address Name '2. f14S MA$$ll-l q. ~f>~.....l. \ <A ,~c::.~ Address LA It; SA- \kr(;~ Name ~o }1,\l~~ 1ar.1CArn6'~( CAo,~~ Ad ess .~ -;;;, )fv.~~&1'V Name SKY"1 tVI J9~ ~\ .28'6;t:- 17;.?,Lp#?/I -;p~#~~~ "- ~ Address er~" p I. SMIII/ t~r :2. g/, (, pet L, N/A ~,f M? 8'eJ I ~~ f8' J;J<;/ ~ ed-, 9sp,~ - t-zq/ (0 fJa(1,L(rrJq fk ~_ Address /1Qt OJ. Har.J~lnciQ J'i-u-E_ N"",. ~ Ad<hess (L/~_ /'flOAJ /769 r/a~ -/}v-Z ~k/) \ Name Address /' t\\Wil\c CC$V"hlQ \lqS \r1. ~~uv,~~ Me.. ~ ~~~.~ . Ad~ess ~ ~ {~~~ \ ""J~\~\~\\ \ 1 ~-\ w. \~ c~L\ ~SJ~ ~\ $-0 Name Address ?rEtE tP/veAJDW ~-&vL ':Jb551 eA Pt'c/D Name/ S1rah wm/fYl f} Name 19,0 ~If6,INA rVJ. Y Address \1011, R~~ ~ Address 17q q vJ. UAClbJl>A Av(!;-. Address ~PvJ\A.~ ~) l~\ W. ttA~ A'VE:. . Name Address A\Jf I <6D3 thC/~ au-e-- Address Name Address Name Address Name Address Name Address Name Address r -- _.__.._._~----------_..._-_._----- ----.-----..,.-..-----'--- \ N 76'45' E 80.00' 8 ~r.~--o--.-o-~ -0- is " "! Z .. I .r ~. . (Jl .. ~ do !Ii H ... N ~ . - ~ I I ~ , a I \J -+- I .., 0 I ..... ~ -,. I 0 ~ (\. -":. I \ ~ ~ I ('b I l^- ~ I .. I \) ;, I ~ <" I ~ W ~ ~ ::=> ~ ~ - .. ~ ~ r o -I " m z )> ~ \I r () ()l 0 U) .1\ -I I .1\ I U -l )> .1\ I (\' () .t.. U (j\ -l D "11 :-I lIlUl 1 ~nI ~ =11 :)- z '" co ..... r- - I I I I I Z I ~ ~I I I I ~I I I . CI' .c fJt ~ b ;~ ~ .. * ...., CONe. '* " ~lJl I~i 'f~~ 1'$ ~~iil ~~ic ?' F------------~~~~- AVE, ~ (60' R/W} .. - "'~ " ----- / () ":...~ ~ ----,.Il;;;.--___ o ~ ---- ~ @ g i~ ~r:; .... ---.I =000 u--1 ~ -' ~ -- r~~,... 11 .. ~ ~ ;s 8 "if'"' tl 0 F ~1- If ~ !!: ~ ~ ~ .. ~ ~ g ~~ ~:J ~~ 1m ~ ~- .. ..., - - l> ~~ r ~ A, is ~~II~il I~ ~I-:~ o I ~ ; - ~ z (Jl :8'l;it; do 8 ~ ... ~ . , ;r-:: 'fN N W i: ;'* - ::l;t ~ e ;9 1:1: '-loc1 ~ :li is --.- ;: ~ ~ -J KHADIV DESIGN 1819 HACIENDA AVENUE CAMPBELL, CA i1 B.dialOladiv IS07 LA TERRACE CIRCLE SAN lOSE, CA 95123 _(.ros)666-1606 Fox: (.ros)997-7136 Emu Acid.-: 1CIuodiv.o.iBn@obcgIoboLnot i ~ I 18 tr HItC/ENb;+- r=:--::f- -~=:=-~~ft~~~~~+~L~~:~l-LI1, t:!_._._____..____,...._.,_" -. ' -'--"'- ,----.....- .. "'.~ it '.. '-Uh_-_'--'-"~-"C"-C'O'''',O'OT~=:''''''-=O'''C~C'' I. ~ II I I I ;; ~ c = = " t E: 1!IJSilIPROJ\Haclend.lHACIENl.<,1JlIG w.~ Jon 07 1':'~ 50 ;woo r- . -.... · II = ~ CClNC. i r==-~=~F~::=-,""-:=fl ":::--- = ~ ~. . = Itl "'.. ~- II ~a I = ~~ ~ = ; ~ . = u ~~ U i~ U U U _ ~ ~ _ 1Il u u ..~ ~~ . .. ~ = ~ I'-~l , ~ :;"'j ~ ~ ; ~ f'-'---T--"'-U] ! I II ~S, S I 6<'!2 i ~ I I I ,--.-..-______ _._L_m___,....._,..__,_' ~_!I! ,~~"~~'\~ i ~ 1I'~,'.l1~,:._.~~'W i ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~ I ~ i ~,' .~_~'t~,~ II I \ S~~-~~, I ~~~%\~~~~~~~~ I .l___.__._._ - '------_U-1 ~~~~_I IB ~ I d' il ~~ ~ . ::: ~ ; : = ~ ~ = = = : EX HI /3/'; ""'--'.....,-......... t ~ ~ 0 N'l l~- = . ~ . ~ A ... ---- .,~ ) " ~ = ,. " EX 1-\ \ ts II A ~ = -.:-. :-:.: -_7:: ;-:.:.:~:. _~~. ".-::; .~_:: :::::. .,,: _: ~~:., _:_:..- _.,_, ~. ~._ , u-t ~ ~ = ~ ~ -t ! -- .., - PROJECI' SUMMARY "-arPorcolNumberIAPl'j): 40:0, - 1:1 - ()'~l " ~; :13 <.j 0 t. 010...'1. tl, (Propony "'........no of_) 1 q ;jot. , Not oq',tl. lal A q,oo.l!. 5t.<"dIVidl~5 "nt lot 101> !) lot!;: ... p, .~ !.ltiliulilm; , Sq. ft, Porco"t,... BulJdin& eo....... .... A ...! S ,-,t A loF g (;---1 3,15~ 3o'lll ~ u.cIocapoeoveroae 5.~OO <4.5~7 ~ Pavin.Covenp ,",!in- :':>'100 ~ PIQPC ArM. R.u12: Toto! buJldin, "I, fl dlvidocl by !lOt 101 Ii.. 14A ME :>'0 3~ AdiaMftt I...aftd UIM: lJa ~ N_ Q-I 1(-1. q South a-I pf1 But 'R.I pn WlIil, K-\ ~-I-\, ~!:'I OJ': " "1'H..- ~-,.._-_..,........__.,-_.....,_.- ' , , I I 80/ " f'/"-"'...../'\ \" ~ V') ~.~- (~" , .~,'..._-,...)/ ~. \ \"\'--' ..../" ,,~) '',,(If'' >< ~ 22.. C'., ( ~ , ~ ""-: t, ---;.r \ ~~j ',(v"s',S lA ~ L A. \Iv /-,j, \J' {) ~ \t- V) <;) l) ...... OfJ'l:. ~'iol2-i - R ':<f'ji/':~ . .... j , ~'\>,i../ . '~~""--.'J 1/--)0-. h.,/,"" go 7<- (0 c.f /0 39 7 S~. FT ',' " P\<.Of'oSSb LoT B 0 Lc;TccvetVr(;,.1;.. 309<fS-F. ==;J..?,nl. L.(m.}G $'f"40ce :z.S''1,? S.F. G.~IZ-A<:P6 S-005.F. 1.'2.. <; i G i I I (" I 01 i I CJ, A, i '<;: I :s , " 0 i ~ , ,::" i g I \ i I I 10 .. I ~8.> I I I C> o " 10,,1 ! \i) N L-A Wt--( x -L ! (!"- ',... ! 0"';1.. " .L., 'It M I , ,r.J'.....~) ,j.l\.).,',..'_,',.;.... ".' ~-- ~ ..",;;~" LA \;...1 N ONt; SiDR.i- fl.. 'PRoFbSED LoT A I 13B.5/5;><...(,S' 9008,S ~~, FT 0 L-oTCdveR-AG'E- 3rS3 S,F, 3S;: L./ VIA!6 '5?.... <::..G zc s g s, r. <:rll-~o Sbo s,r:;:. e Two CAR. GARAc?E LAw N. +--- I ! j<f-----,.--... I ~5 . -,--,_".~~_.w__ '''''''''__"__.___ , 80 1813 1-/ A C IEfJDP) rRltcT NO. '8oCJ o I/J NE f(: f1 R. :Tit cf.< LoT 27- 8ft Te s I WQ CAt<- aA1i:'AGe ~5' ?f\ \l(,Q...S ' (~ ~, ,-('l.\ \i'd' I~~ '1:::'1 r' f/ ''I, "'...... {~' -,j ':;1\ {:;~S, \':1} '1)-.)0 1!0 8 < "') (." ., t-,. GJ ro \r) . N \J "'i ..,....- {;1 <: .A, <\J. -::;,l'(~ \lj~i ; Q; 0.:. W L~ > :{' ~ l' i :1 Ci- ,<l I,~ t=l !~ :'4 ~ ,'-I , iN') ...._--~--_..,-------- / -----.-1-..." )5 -",wl ~ V' I, , EXH\ Bll" B I ,.----..--.---~pRo?O~D SITE. pL.-ItN . ~ / SCA L'E: / ~ 10 /-2/-0'1- N