Antenna - 200270 N. First Street, Campbell CA 95008 FAX (408) 866-8381
To: Dennis Martin From: Darcy Smith
Fax: 294-5672 Pages: 3
Phone: Date: 12/13/02
Re: Follow-up -Sprint Site @ 700 W. Hamilton Ave
Dennis
I looked into the Nextel file for the monopine at 700 W. Hamilton Ave and
determined that they actually paid only $32,000. I am enclosing documentation
showing this payment and the cost estimation that was used to determine it. It
should be noted that they were paying for the actual plant materials for the 690 feet
of median and the expressway shoulder near the building, whereas the money
contributed by Sprint would be used for installation of irrigation and long-term
maintenance.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions about this at (408) 866-
2193.
Thanks,
Darcy Smith
Planner II
City of Campbell
ACCORD COMMUNICATIONS
Project and Facility Management
November 13, 2002
Darcy Smith REcEwEa
Planner II
City of Campbell
N0~ fi 8 20~
Community Development Department
70 N
h Fi
St
t
CITY OF CAA~pg
Eu
rst
ree
ort .
PUNN1~ ~E
~
Campbell, CA 95008-1436 .
RE: Peer Review and Analysis of the Sprint PCS Facility at 700 W. Hamilton.
Dear Ms. Smith:
I visited the existing site and alternate locations proposed in the Sprint PCS report. From a technical
standpoint, the only other building of sufficient height with potential to replace the 700 W. Hamilton site is
the Larkspur Landing Home Suite Hotel. I do agree with the Sprint conclusion that disguising the antennas
on that building would not be practical. A tree structure like the nearby Nextel facility would also be a
potential replacement but not practical from a cost standpoint.
On November 7, 2002, I met with Sprint PCS staff to review engineering and coverage requirements. We
proceeded to install a test antenna and transmitter to analyze the coverage. The antenna was installed as
close as practical to the operating antennas. The first drive test established the base line data for an antenna
of the same make and model as employed in the current system. The antenna was then lowered three feet
four inches to the height required by the City of Campbell Municipal code Chapter 21.60. A second drive
test was conducted to measure the effect of the decreased height. This test was repeated in detail for a
second sector of the site.
The areas serviced by the "Gamma" and "Beta" sectors were driven with the test antenna at both heights for
each sector. The signal strength was automatically logged by the test system. I also took manual readings at
twenty locations during the drive tests to verify the automatic data log.
I extensively analyzed the data collected. I determined the change in signal strength over seventeen street
sections within the coverage area. The following table summarizes the effect of the height reduction taking
into account 465 data points along the seventeen street sections. The areas of most concern are noted in
bold italics . These areas will be negatively affected by the reduced antenna height, mostly within
buildings. The coverage is already marginal in those areas and a reduced signal will make for an even less
reliable connection. The areas along Winchester will be supplemented by the adjacent cell sites. Thus, the
negative effect is minimized on Winchester. W. Hamilton -Marathon to Cloverdale, Marathon -Latimer to
W. Hamilton and Springfield -Charleston to Darryl have sufficient signal strength at either antenna height.
ACCORD COMMUNICATIONS
Project and Facility Management
The effect of reducing the antenna heights by 3' 4" will have a detrimental effect on Sprint PCS phone users
within areas (noted in the table) already experiencing marginal coverage. The average reduction in signal
level is 2.1 dB. Sprint broadly defines signals as: Good, Fair, Weak and Poor. These signals are separated
by l OdB. Thus for example the 2.1 dB change is enough to change a Good signal to Fair but not enough to
skip a signal grade and change it to Weak. It should be noted the "dB" scale is logarithmic, not linear. Thus
-IOdB is 0.1 of the original while -2.1dB is 0.6 of the original.
Street section
*Signal strength in dBm Existing
antenna
height* 3' 4"
reduction
in antenna
height* Difference
W. Hamilton -Marathon to Cloverdale 71.3 78.5 -7.2
Marathon -Latimer to W. Hamilton 71.0 76.0 -5
Cadillac (start at Winchester) to Maria to Merrimac to
Millich to W. Hamilton 84.9 89.1 -4.2
Sprin~eld -Charleston to Darryl 77.8 81.8 -4
Winchester -Cadillac to W. Hamilton 91.7 95.1 -3.4
Winchester -Latimer to W. Campbell 92.2 95.5 -3.3
Latimer -Cloverdale to Darryl 79.4 82.1 -2.7
Vctor -Latimer to W. Campbell 81.4 83.9 -2.5
Carlyn - W. Hamilton to W. Campbell 82.7 84.6 -1.9
Bismark -Phoenix to W. Hamilton 91.2 92.8 -1.6
W. Campbell -Elder to Winchester 87.1 88.5 -1.4
Cloverdale - W. Hamilton to Latimer 87.1 87.5 -0.4
Llewellyn - W. Hamilton to Latimer 78.6 78.7 -0.1
Latimer -from Llewellyn to Winchester 87.9 87.6 0.3
Darryl to Chairman to Elder - W. Hamilton to W. Campbell 73.6 71.9 1.7
W. Campbell -Victor to San Tomas Exwy. 83.1 80.7 2.4
W. Hamilton -San Tomas Exwy. To Winchester 79.9 76.4 3.5
ACCORD COMMUNICATIONS
Project and Facility Management
Findings and Conclusions
There are no buildings within the immediate vicinity of 700 W. Hamilton to which the site can be relocated
and provide equal or better coverage except potentially the Larkspur Landing Home Suite Hotel. This
building does not appear to be practical from the standpoint of disguising the antennas at the needed height.
Had this cell site provided "Good" coverage over it's designed coverage area, the height reduction would
have had minimal to no impact. However, because the existing coverage is less than optimal, the effect of
the height reduction will have a negative impact on system performance. There is no way to exactly
quantify the effect of reduced antenna height on performance without actually operating the site at reduced
antenna height then logging system data and customer complaints for an extended period of time.
Empirically, I conclude the overall site performance will decrease between 10-15% with a 3' 4" reduction in
the height of the antennas.
Thank you for the opportunity to serve the City of Campbell. Please let me know if I can answer any
questions.
Sincerely,
Peter Gruchawka
P.O. Box 670 Kenwood, California 95452 License # 718597 (707) 833-5027 FAX (707) 833-2805
of ' SAM _
s
~~
•~RCN AR~•
CITY of CAMPBELL
Community Development Department
October 21, 2002
Peter Gruchawka
Accord Communications
P.O. Box 670
Kenwood, CA 95452
Re: Notice to Proceed on Sprint Peer Review
Dear Mr. Gruchaka:
CAMPBELL
i -'~-~
1
This letter hereby serves as a notice to proceed on the peer review of a supplemental report and
signal strength analysis documenting the need to retain the existing antenna height at a Sprint
facility located at 700 W. Hamilton that has been in operation since 1996. Enclosed is a copy of
the purchase order in the amount of $3,500.
Currently the antennas are located 9'-9" above the parapet of the roof. The City's Wireless
Telecommunications Ordinance, which was adopted after the existing antennas were installed,
stipulates that "no roof-mounted antennas, including support structures, shall exceed six feet in
height above the parapet of the roof." Therefore, staff has requested that the height of the antennas
be lowed 3'-9" from their current height. Sprint has prepared a supplemental report that documents
the existing conditions and the need to maintain the existing antenna height. The report concludes
that the lowering of the antennas would severely impact the existing coverage footprint and would
increase the Blocked Call Rate and Dropped Call Rate by 15 to 25 percent.
Section 21.60.140 (4) of the City's Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Ordinance stipulates
that "applications for antennas that exceed the maximum height must submit a supplementary
report outlining the reasons why the height requirement cannot be met. The director shall require
an independent review, paid for in advance by the applicant, to evaluate the applicant's request.
Factors to be considered are whether or not another site exists where the standards can be met, is
there another method of installation that would result in a project that complies with the standards,
would the addition of another wireless telecommunications facility allow the reduction in height of
the proposed facility and any other technically feasible method of siting the facility that would
reduce the height. If it is determined that the additional height is necessary, additional screening
may be required to mitigate adverse visual impacts."
The supplemental report contains the following materials: EMS specification sheet, project plans,
map of alternative sites analyzed, map showing location of additional sites needed if antennas were
lowered, two sets of drive test maps showing coverage signal strength measurements for the
70 North First Street ~ Campbell, California 95008-1436 ret 408.866.2140 Fnx 408.871.5140 roe 408.866.2790
existing and proposed antenna heights, and RF Propagation Maps showing predicted wireless
coverage with the existing and proposed antenna heights.
Your contact at Sprint is Dennis Martin of Sausedo Company who can be reached at (408) 294-
5687 for assistance with arranging the drive tests. Please do not hesitate to contact me at (408)
866-2193 if you have any questions about this project. I look forward to receiving your review in
November.
Sincerely,
1~a,r~-,~rvu~t~
Darcy Smith
Planner II
Enclosure: Purchase Order
Supplemental Report
City of Campbell Wireless Telecommunications Facilities Ordinance
l ' "~d`~-7C1
~
To: City Clerk Planning File No: /
-
Please collect and receipt Address: 7aU W. ~RiYir /fort
For the following monies.
ITEM AMOUNT
1. Maior.
A. 5+ acres - General Plan Amendment 6,166.00
Zone Change 6,166.00
Planned Development Permit 6,166.00
ElR Review 6,166.00
B. 1-5 acres - General Plan Amendment 5,131.00
Zone Change 5,131.00
Planned Development Permit 5,131.00
EIR Review 5,131.00
C. 0-1 acre General Plan Amendment 3,723.00
Zone Change 3,723.00
Planned Development Permit 3,723.00
EIR Review 3,723.00
2. Minor:
A. Subdivision Map (5+ lots) 3,723.00
Site and Architectural 10,000+ squaze feet 2,489.00
Tentative Pazcel Map (4clots) 2,489.00
B. Site and Architectural 0-10,000 squaze feet 1,796.00
Variance (non-residential) 1,796.00
Text Amendments 1,796.00
Use Permit 1,796.00
Commercial RemodeUNo Additional Squaze Feet 1,796.00
3. Miscellaneous
A. Variance (residential) 1,122.00
Modifications of Approval 1,122.00
Modification PD Permit 1,122.00
Reinstatements 1,122.00
Revised Development Schedule 1,122.00
Extensions of Time 1,122.00
B. Site and Architectural (residentiaUeach house) 139.00
Minor Modifications to Side Yazd Setback (residential) 139.00
Signs (each sign) 139.00
Sign Program 531.00
Fence Exception 138.00
Promotional Events 139.00
Residential RemodeUAddition 139.00
Single Family Residential Designated Landmazk Alteration 139.00
4. Other:
Appeal Filing Fee 100.00
Maps (Black &White) 10.00
Maps (Color) If Available 70.00
General Plan Text (After 2001 Update Adopted) 45.00
Copies (per page) 1.00 ls` pg/.lOpp add'1
Refundable Deposit -Account 2203 - Amount Varies /,~ G7 L7fJ -~
Fire Department Review -Account 01.303.4241
• Architectural Approval 59.50
• Project Plan Review 178.25
• Subdivision $119.00 +$10 per lot
Park Impact Fee -Account 295.535.4920 Amount Varies
Tree Replacement In-Lieu Fees -Account 101.701.4971 Amount Vanes
Architectural Advisor Fee $150.00
RECEIVEt.~
For City Clerk Only: Receipt Nppo~~.: ~
Receiv~by~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~
Date:
Exception for Major Projectrs ~ tt 1s ~i~'R~t~.dp~ation processing costs of selected major projects will significantly
exceed the above fees. In these cases, the Community Development Director may collect a deposit and chazge actual time to
process the applications based upon current hourly rates.
Note: Adopted on 5/7/02 by Campbell City Council Resolution No. 10014, effective 7/8/02.
To: City Clerk ~ - Planning File No: _ ~~~ IX~ a ~ . I
Please collect and receipt Address:~lZ.__ r1 GiVYI i I'1"DVI }~~,
For the following monies.
ITEM AMOUNT
1. Maior•
A. 5+ acres - General Plan Amendment 6,166.00
Zone Change 6,166.00
Planned Development Permit 6,166.00
EIR Review 6,166.00
B. 1-5 acres - General Plan Amendment 5,131.00
Zone Change 5,131.00
Planned Development Permit 5,131.00
EIR Review 5,131.00
C. 0-1 acre General Plan Amendment 3,723.00
Zone Change 3,723.00
Planned Development Permit 3,723.00
EIR Review 3,723.00
2. Minor:
A. Subdivision Map (5+ lots) 3,723.00
Site and Architectural 10,000+ square feet 2,489.00
Tentative Pazcel Map (4<lots) 2,489.00
B. Site and Architectural 0-10,000 sgttaze feet 1,796.00
Variance (non-residential) 1,796.00
Text Amendments 1,796.00
Use Permit 1,796.00
3. Miscellaneous
A. Variance (residential) 1,122.00
Modifications of Approval 1,122.00
Modification PD Permit 1,122.00
Reinstatements 1,122.00
Revised Development Schedule 1,122.00
Extensions of Time 1,122.00
B. Site and Architectural (residentiaUeach house) 139.00
Minor Modifications to Side Yard Setback (residential) 139.00
Signs (each sign) 139.00
Sign Program 531.00
Fence Exception 138.00
Promotional Events 139.00
Appeals 100.00
4. Other:
Maps (Black &White) 10.00
Maps (Color) If Available 70.00
General Plan Text (After 2001 Update Adopted) 45.00
Copies (per page) 1.00 lu pg/.lOpp add'l
Refundable Deposit -Account 2203 Amount Varies ~ 7 SQO , DO
Fire Department Review -Account 01.303.4241
• Architectural Approval 59.50
• Project Plan Review 178.25
• Subdivision $119.00 +$10 per lot
Park Impact Fee -Account 295.535.4920 Amount Varies
Tree Replacement In-Lieu Fees -Account 101.701.4971 Amount Varies
For City Clerk Only: Receipt No.: q
Amount Paid: ~~~ 1 ~ ~ J-'\ C
Received b
Date:
Exception for Major Projects: It is anticipated that the application processing costs of selected major projects will significantly
exceed the above fees. In these cases, the Community Development Director may collect a deposit and charge actual time to
process the applications based upon current hourly rates.
Note: Adopted on 5!7/02 by Campbell City Council Resolution No. 10014, effective 7/8/02.
~--
ACCORD COMMUNICATIONS
Project and Facility Management
August 9, 2002
Darcy Smith
Planner II
City of Campbell
Community Development Department
70 North First Street
Campbell, CA 95008-1436
Dear Ms. Smith:
RE: Peer Review and Analysis of the Sprint PCS Facility at 700 W. Hamilton.
RECEBV~~
A~~~ ~ ~~ ~"t~~~
CITY OF CAMPBELL
PLANNING DEPT.
It was a pleasure speaking with you. Thank you for taking the time to answer my questions regarding the
project.
My fee to the City will be $3;Sr50 including all materials and travel time to and from my office based on the
following scope of work:~3~fjOD
1. Review and analyze the facility planning file and the Sprint PCS supplemental report.
2. Visit the existing site and alternate locations proposed in the Sprint PCS report.
3. Meet with Sprint PCS staff to review engineering data and coverage requirements.
4. Attend and observe the two required Sprint drive tests (antennas placed at the existing and proposed
locations).
5. Provide a report to you on my findings and conclusions.
6. Attend one Community Development Department meeting in Campbell if required.
I will be able to start the project within two weeks of receipt of the Purchase Order. Conditional on the
availability of Sprint PCS personnel, I can complete the project within three to four weeks of receipt of the
P.O.
Thank you for the opportunity to serve the City of Campbell. Please let me know if I can answer any
questions.
Sincerely,
Peter Gruchawka
P.O. Box 670 Kenwood, Califorttiia 95452 License # 718597 (707) 833-5027 FAX (707) 833-2805
ACCORD COMMUNICATIONS
Project and Facility Management
ACCORD COMMUNICATIONS
Peter Gruchawka -President
Credentials
- Thirty-three years professional experience in the land mobile communications industry.
- Illinois Institute of Technology, Electrical Engineering Major.
- FCC General Radiotelephone Operator License (# PG-12-27168)
Qualified per Paragraph IV of FCC 96-326 to conduct NIER compliance studies.
- State of California Contractor's License (# 718597)
- Theory and survey hazard training for radio frequency radiation.
Loral -Hauppauge NY
Partial List of Clients
American Tower Corporation
C & C Equipment Company
California Highway Patrol
California State Automobile Association
Cal Trans
City of Pleasanton
Cocola Media Corporation
County of Los Angeles
County of Marin
Golden Gate Bridge District
KTLN-TV
Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District
WestCom Towers
Specialties
- Provide proof of performance testing of telecommunication facilities.
- Conduct field and mathematical studies of Nonionizing Electromagnetic Radiation (VIER).
- Design and implement emergency communications systems.
- Design and construct communication sites and project management.
- Design and test antenna systems.
P.O. Box 670 Kenwood, California 95452 License # 718597 (70'7) 833-5027 FAX (707) 833-2805
August 2, 2002
Peter Gruchaka
Accord Communications
P.O. Box 670
Kenwood, CA 95452
RE: Request for Proposal for Peer Review
Deaz Mr. Gruchaka:
Dennis Martin of The Sausedo Company, who is representing Sprint PCS, mentioned that you
might be interested in this peer review since you have worked on similaz projects for other
municipalities. The City of Campbell Community Development Department is requesting
proposals for a peer review of a supplemental report and signal strength analysis documenting the
need to retain the existing antenna height at a facility located at 700 W. Hamilton that has been in
operation since 1996. The City's Telecommunications Ordinance requires the height of the
antennas to be lowed three feet from their current height. At the request of staff, Sprint has
prepazed a supplemental report that documents the existing conditions and the need to maintain the
existing antenna height.
The supplemental report contains the following materials: EMS specification sheet, project plans,
map of alternative sites analyzed, map showing location of additional sites needed if antennas were
lowered, two sets of drive test maps showing coverage signal strength measurements for the
existing and proposed antenna heights, and RF Propagation Maps showing predicted wireless
coverage with the existing and proposed antenna heights. The report concludes that the lowering of
the antennas would severely impact the existing coverage footprint and would increase the
Blocked Call Rate and Dropped Call Rate by 15 to 25 percent.
We aze looking for a firm with qualified radio frequency engineers that have a working knowledge
of CDMA technology. If you are interested in working on this project, please provide me with
your qualifications, aproject budget, and schedule. The peer review should include a drive test
review with the assistance of Sprint vehicles, equipment and personnel. Please do not hesitate to
contact me at (408) 866-2193 for more information about this project.
Sincerely,
~Ct,rcr.~ Srrt,c~
Darcy Smith
Planner II
70 North First Street Campbell, California 95008-1436 rep 408.866.2140 Fnx 408.866.8381 T~~ 408.866.2790
~~15~0
ompany
69 6esterAoeuue • SaaJose, California 95125
July 2, 2002
City of Campbell
Community Development Department
70 North First Street
Campbell, CA 95008-1436
Attn: Darcy Smith
Telephone:408-294-5687
Facsimile. 408-294-5671
rrr-~rsausedocompau1 com
Subject: Sprint PCS Supplemental Report to Pending Permit Renewal for Staff and
Peer Review of an existing wireless telecommunications facility at 700
West Hamilton Avenue, Campbell, CA.
Sprint PCS Project No: FS04xc141Go1d's Gym
Dear Ms. Smith,
On behalf of our client, Sprint PCS, we respectfully request that you accept the attached
report for Staff and Peer review of the above referenced project. The following items are
provided with this Supplemental Report:
1. One (1) check in the amount of $2500.00, (Peer Review fee deposit).
2. One (1) Description and Analysis of the Project.
3. One (1) Set of Photos showing existing conditions.
4. One (1) Set of 11"x17" Project Plans.
5. One (1) EMS Wireless Antenna Specification Sheet.
6. One (1) Map showing existing Sprint sites in Campbell.
7. One (1) Map of Alternative Sites Analyzed by Sprint PCS.
8. One (1) Map showing location of additional sites needed if antennas lowered.
9. One (1) Set q~ Drive Test Maps showing existing coverage with antennas at 9' above
roof parapet level in three sectors.
l0.One (1) Set of Arive Test Maps showing coverage with antennas at 6' above roof
parapet level.
11. One (1} Set ~' RF Propagation Maps showing wireless coverage provided by existing
site and its fit within the Sprint PCS network in the City of Campbell.
12.One (1) Set of RF Propagation Maps showing predicted wireless coverage at subject
site with antennas lowered to 6' above roof parapet level.
13.One (1) Set of RF Propagation MAps sieving predicted wireless coverage with three
sites lowered to 6' above roof parapet levvel.
Public Affairs Consultants for Business & Development
I look forward to working with City of Campbell Staff on this project. Please feel free to
contact me should you need any additional materials or clarification of any aspects of the
report. I can be reached by phone at (408) 294-5687 and email at
dmartinC~ sausedocompany.com.
Yours truly,
Dennis Martin
Vice President
Sausedo Company, Representing Sprint PCS
cc: Patricia Sausedo
Mark Gagne, Sprint PCS
Sprint.
A Supplemental Report by Sprint PCS
To a Permit Renewal Review
Of an Existing Wireless Telecommunications Facility
Gold's Gym Building
700 West Hamilton Avenue, Campbell
Sprint PCS Project
FS04xc141
Submitted on behalf of Sprint PCS by
Dennis Martin
Sausedo Company
69 Lester Avenue
San Jose, CA 95125
Ph: 408-294-5687
Fx: 408-294-5672
RECEIVED
~u~ 0 2 2002
CITY OF CAMPBEI.I~
PLANNING DEPT. F~~•
Supplemental Report
Project Description and Site Analysis
Sprint PCS -Wireless Telecommunication Facility
70(1 West Hamilton Ave, Campbell CA 950118
Sprint Site FS04XC141 Gold's Gym
1. Sprint PCS's Request
Sprint PCS respectfully requests that the City of Campbell reviews the attached
supplemental report and supporting documentation with regards to renewing a Conditional
Use Permit for an existing wireless telecommunications facility at 700 West Hamilton
Avenue.
Sprint PCS supports this review of antenna heights at 700 West Campbell Avenue, and
believes that a peer review is necessary because City of Campbell Staff does not have
expertise in PCS technology. In order to gain an informed and objective expert review,
Sprint PCS believes that it will be important that the Peer Reviewer be a qualified radio
frequency engineer with a working understanding of CDMA technology.
Sprint PCS respectfully requests that the RFQ/RFP issued by the City of Campbell
specifically identifies knowledge and experience with CDMA technology as an important
qualification for the awarding of a Peer Review contract.
Sprint PCS also requests that upon favorable review of this report and documentation by
Staff and by a qualified radio frequency engineer, the City of Campbell Staff finds that the
existing height and location of Sprint PCS antennas is necessary to perform their intended
function.
Site History
On November 26, 1996, The City of Campbell Planning Commission approved a
Conditional Use Permit to allow Sprint PCS to install a wireless telecommunications
facility at 700 West Hamilton Avenue. At that time, the Planning Commission found that
the proposal was consistent with all local and general plan zoning ordinances, and that the
proposed project as conditioned would aid in the harmonious development of the
immediate area. Condition of Approval #6 called for the permit to expire after five years,
and that the applicant must apply for a CUP renewal at that time to continue operations.
Subsequently, the City of Campbell in 1998 enacted a Wireless Telecommunication
Ordinance which has as one of its development standards a height limit of six feet above
the roof parapet for building mounted antennas for all new and renewable wireless
telecommunication sites. The Sprint PCS antennas at 700 West Campbell Avenue exceed
this height limit.
2. E~sting Conditions
The Gold's Gym Building at 700 West Hamilton Avenue is a large 3-story office building
on the Southwest comer of the San Thomas Expressway and Hamilton Avenue
intersection. Currently, Sprint PCS has three antennas mounted on three separate
tripods/poles at two locations on the rooftop of this building. The tops of the antennas
currently stand at 49ft above ground level, which puts it at 13ft above the roof level, and
9ft above the parapet wall.
Sprint PCS at 700 West Hamilton Avenue became operational in the spring of 1997 and
has been providing excellent service to the business and residential community of
Campbell since its activation. This site represents a critical component of the overall
Sprint PCS system within the City of Campbell, located as it is at one of the busiest
intersections in Silicon Valley. Additionally, the site links with several other sites to
provide seamless coverage and capacity to this highly developed and mobile community.
Sprint PCS is one of four wireless service providers with antenna facilities mounted on the
Gold's Gym building at 700 West Hamilton Avenue. Two of the wireless service
providers, Verizon Wireless, and Cingular Wireless, have antenna heights higher than the
existing Sprint PCS antennas.
3. Alternative Site Analysis
Staff requested that Sprint conduct an alternative site analysis in an effort to answer this
question: "Is there an alternative site where the standards can be met?" A survey of
possible alternative sites in the area around the Gold's Gym site was completed. The
following findings were noted:
1. Golden Gate Language Center
This is a small 2-story office building situated on the northeast corner of San Tomas
Expresswy and Hamilton Ave. The building, which is lower than our existing site at
Gold's Gym, is surrounded by tall pine trees which would act as a barrier to RF signal
propagation, if our antennas were placed Eft above roof line/parapet. Locating our
antennas on this site in accordance with the height restrictions would make our antennas
virtually invisible from street level, but would provide minimal signal coverage to the
surrounding areas due to its low height. This is therefore not a suitable building for
locating antennas.
2. Larkspur Landing -Home Suite Hotel
This 4story building, which is comprised of several steeply pitched roofs, is of similar
height to the Gold's Gym site. It is located at the southeast corner of San Tomas
Expressway and Hamilton Ave. Attempting to locate antennas on this building would
require heavy stealthing techniques and may involve modifying the existing architecture
to accommodate any antenna stealth design used. Stealth structure would be highly visible
from street level. The cost of such an undertaking would be prohibitively expensive! RF
signal propagation from this building would be partially blocked by the Gold's Gym
building, causing a reduction in signal strength in the wesdsouthwesterly direction, which
would mean a greater incidence of dropped and/or blocked calls for customers driving on
West Hamilton Ave and in the residential vicinity. This would leave Sprint PCS in a
worse-off situation than currently exists, in terms of providing a clean, reliable service to
its customers. Therefore, this would not be a suitable candidate on which to locate our
antennas.
3. Scandinavian Furniture/One-Stop Liquors Groceries
This is a one-story commercial building situated on the northwest corner of San Tomas
Expressway and Hamilton Ave. The low overall height of this building would make it an
unsuitable potential candidate for locating antennas. RF signal would not propagate very
far if antennas were mounted in accordance with height restrictions. This building would
therefore not serve our coverage needs and cannot be considered as a potential cell site.
4. BayView Bank
This single-story building lies immediately west of the Gold's Gym site on Hamilton Ave,
and is partially surrounded by pine trees. Due to the low height of this building, RF signal
propagation would be severely impaired if antennas were relocated here in accordance
with height restrictions. Our coverage radius would shrink appreciably, resulting in
increased dropped and blocked calls in those azeas outside the immediate vicinity of the
site. This is therefore not a suitable building on which to locate our antennas.
5. Ten-stor~partment Building Located at Hamilton Ave and Winchester Ave.
This building although ideal from a RF signal propagation aspect given the height is
situated too far east of the Gold's Gym site (0.7miles) to adequately meet our coverage
needs. Relocating antennas on this building would not provide effective coverage on San
Tomas Expressway north and south of Hamilton Ave, and would indeed create a coverage
gap along West Hamilton Ave in the vicinity of San Tomas Aquino Ave. This coverage
gap could only be remedied by adding another cell site in this area. The primary coverage
goal of Sprint PCS is to provide a clean, reliable level of service to its mobile customers
on major traffic routes. The Gold's Gym site is thus ideally situated to meet this goal. It is
therefore unwise to consider moving the site to this building, since its location is too
distant from the target azeas of coverage.
As this alternative site analysis reveals, the Gold's Gym building is the most suitable
building in the target coverage area. Any other feasible location is severely limited by
either radio frequency demands, or by the physical structure of the building itself. Please
refer to the Alternative Site Map for specific locations in this geographic area.
4. Additional Sites
If new sites were added to compensate for the reduced coverage footprint, then these sites
would need to be located in or near residential areas, such as along Payne Ave at
Winchester Ave; San Tomas Aquino at Hamilton Ave; and Bucknall Road at Via Deste. It
is estimated that up to 3 new sites would be needed to fill the coverage gaps arising as a
result of lowering the antennas to only Eft above the parapet wall, in order to maintain our
existing level of coverage.
Sprint PCS currently has 4 cell sites that fall within the City of Campbell jurisdiction. We
do not plan to add any more sites in this azea in the near future, since our coverage goals
have been met. Further enhancements to network performance can be done through
optimization of exis~ng sites. Please refer to a map of locations in the City of Campbell
where an alternative site would be required to compensate for the reduced coverage
arising from lowering the antennas.
5.Other Important Considerations
Alternative Installation Methods
Sprint PCS utilizes the EMS Wireless RR90-17-XXDP antenna at the Gold's Gym site.
The dimensions of this antenna are 56"x 8"x 2.75". This is the smallest antenna available
to Sprint PCS to perform the necessary function of the site. Please refer to the antenna
specification sheet provided with this report.
Currently, there exists no other method of installation that would comply with the new
height standards and still meet our coverage objectives. Under the new standards, the top
of any antenna structure is required to be only Eft above the parapet wall and this has been
predicted, in the case of our existing Campbell sites, to adversely affect our coverage and
level of service.
4
The key issue here is the overall height of the antenna above the ground that has a direct
bearing on the resulting cell radius. To work effectively, an antenna needs to be positioned
high enough above the general clutter of surrounding buildings and trees, to allow for the
unimpeded propagation of the RF signal. This is of critical importance in suburban areas,
which are characterized by low-rise light commercial buildings, extensive residential areas
and heavy foliage throughout. If these criteria are not met, the performance of the wireless
system will be marked with excessive amounts of blocked calls and dropped calls as users
move farther away from the site. No alternative method of installation can overcome this
basic physical requirement of satisfactory antenna height in providing reliable system
performance.
Shortened Battery Life of Mobile Phone
One of the side effects of using the mobile phone in an area of reduced signal strength, is
that the phone tries to compensate for the reduction in available signal by increasing its
output power. This, of course, will cause a faster drain on the phone battery resulting in a
great inconvenience to those customers who rely heavily on their mobile phones. The
increased output power of mobile phones can also have an adverse effect on system
performance in that the increased strength of the phone transmit signal to the serving cell
site, will add to the background noise causing an increase in the noise floor. This situation
can affect the number of users that the cell site can service, due to power limitations. It is
predicted that these effects will be in evidence in areas around the site where signal
strengths are reduced as a result of lowering the antennas. This is apart from the general
reduction in capacity of the site (ability to serve the maximum number of users).
The Coming of 3G
With the coming of 3G technology (Third Generation) geared for data and streaming
video, it is critically important to maintain a strong RF signal environment at all locations,
in order to maximize system performance. This will enable the smooth, reliable
functioning of the many new features which 3G will offer. Keeping the antennas at their
existing height will ensure that Sprint PCS continues to provide the highest level of
service to its customers in the City of Campbell.
6. Supporting RF Engineering Analysis.
Site Location: The Gold's Gym site is located on southwest corner of San Tomas
Expressway and Hamilton Ave intersection.
The following is a description of some of the locations that would suffer from service
degradation if the antennas at the Gold's Gym site were lowered. In these areas it is
predicted that on-street voice quality would degrade, in-building voice quality become
S
unreliable and data rates reduced. Please refer to CW Test Map results provided by Sprint
PCS RF Engineering.
ALPHA SECTOR -Areas north of Gold's Gym site
• Maria Way, between Valley Forge Ave and Payne Ave -Mobile Receive strength drops
from Weak to Poor.
• Cadillac Drive, between Maria Way and Lexington Drive -Mobile Receive strength
drops from Fair to Weak.
• Gleason Ave at Phoenix Ave -Mobile Receive strength drops from Fair to Weak.
• Woodcreek Lane, west of Boynton Ave -Mobile Receive strength drops from Weak to
Poor.
BETA SECTOR -Areas south and east of Gold's Gym site
• Hamilton Ave between Eden Ave and Winchester Blvd -Mobile Receive strength drops
from Fair to Weak.
• Campbell Ave at San Tomas Expressway -Mobile Receive strength drops from Weak to
Poor.
• Campbell Ave between Virginia Ave and Abbey Lane -Mobile Receive strength drops
from Weak to Poor.
• Cadillac Drive, between Eden Ave and Winchester Blvd -Mobile Receive strength
drops from Weak to Poor.
GAMMA SECTOR -Areas south and west of Gold's Gym site
• San Tomas Expressway between Latimer Ave and Campbell Ave -Mobile Receive
strength drops from Good to Fair.
• Latimer Ave between Daryl Drive and Marathon Drive -Mobile Receive strength drops
from predominantly Good to predominantly Fair.
• Latimer Ave between Mitchell Drive and Redford Drive -Mobile Receive strength
drops from Fair to a mix of Fair and Weak.
• Southern half of Victor Ave intersecting with Campbell Ave -Mobile Receive strength
drops from predominantly Fair to all Weak.
It should be noted that the findings reported above represent on-street and in-vehicle
coverage. Conditions for in-building coverage will be worse, since it requires an extra 10
to 20dB of signal strength to penetrate most buildings. Thus, customers using their mobile
phones indoors in the affected areas will experience a dramatic degradation in quality of
service, in terms of difficulty making and receiving calls. In many instances users inside
buildings will have their incoming calls routed directly to voice mail due to the fall off in
signal strength. These are classic examples of unreliable service as experienced by the
customer and are the root cause of the frustration from which many complaints to
Customer Service arise.
Mobile Receive Strength is a measure of the strength of the signal reaching the mobile
phone from the serving cell site/s. The stronger the available signal, the more reliable the
system performance. A Good Mobile Receive Strength is typically less than -80dBm. At
this level the RF signal can penetrate the upper floors of most buildings and provide a
reasonable level of service. The following is a breakdown of the different categories of
Mobile Receive Strength and their effects as perceived by the user:
Good Signal Calls can be made and received on the street, in the caz and in a building,
with good voice quality.
Fair Signal Calls can be made and received on the street and in the car with good voice
quality. Users in a building may experience poor voice quality depending on their exact
location within the building and on the material structure of the building.
Weak Signal Users might experience poor voice quality and may drop the call, especially
if they are in a fast moving car. Users in a building may experience difficulty making and
receiving calls, depending on their location within the building and the material structure
of the building. In-coming calls may be routed directly to voice-mail in many instances,
due to weak signal strengths.
Poor Signal In places where calls can be made, voice quality will be poor and calls are
likely to drop, depending on their actual location in relation to the serving cell site. The
number of dropped and blocked calls is increased as more users are added to the system.
In-coming calls are likely to be routed directly to voice mail. In general, service will be
unreliable.
7. Conclusion
Drive test analysis shows that lowering the antennas at this site, in accordance with the
new height limits, would severely impact the existing coverage footprint, resulting in a
very noticeable deterioration in voice quality. In many cases, customers using their mobile
phones neaz the cell edge would have difficulty making and receiving calls due to the
reduced available signal. Areas along San Tomas Expressway -just south of Payne Ave;
Campbell Ave between San Tomas Expressway and Milton Ave; and Hamilton Ave
between Eden Ave and Winchester Blvd, would be particulazly affected.
It is estimated that the Blocked Call Rate (a measure of network inaccessibility) and the
Dropped Call Rate (premature ending of a call in progress) would increase by at least 15 -
25%, reflecting the reduced coverage footprint as a result of lowering the antennas.
Furthermore, the increased demand on the Sprint PCS system expected with the launch of
3G services in the very near future would exacerbate any coverage or capacity
weaknesses.
7
Sprint PCS currently does not have plans to build any new sites in Campbell in the next 3
to 5 years because the existing coverage and capacity meets our network needs. Being
restricted to placing antennas just Eft above the parapet wall at this critical location would
severely restrain our ability to provide adequate and reliable service to our customers in
the City of Campbell. The development of additional sites to compensate for this loss of
coverage would force wireless telecommunications facilities further into the residential
neighborhoods of Campbell.
In conclusion, Sprint PCS believes that review of this report will reveal that enforcement
of the 6 feet above roof parapet height limit to existing facilities will precipitate the
significant reduction of service coverage, capacity, and call quality to the businesses and
residents of the City of Campbell and surrounding communities. The current location and
antenna height of the facility is the most efficient configuration for the existing Sprint
PCS network. We request that the City of Campbell reviews any decision thoroughly and
objectively that may affect this critical service.
R
Network Drive Test Results
Definition: A network drive test is the collection and storage of signal data via a mobile phone whilst driving
selected streets, (usually major streets, freeways and some residential streets) throughout the coverage area.
The network signal is picked up with the aid of a small receive antenna mounted on top of the drive test
vehicle. This antenna is tuned to the broadcast (carrier) frequency of the system. A similarly mounted GPS
antenna tracks the exact position of the vehicle as the signals are received and logged. Special drive test data
collection software is used in this process and the real-time signal information is captured and stored in a
laptop computer. On completion, the data is processed using appropriate software tools and plots
representing a record of the drive route are made. Key parameters can be displayed on these plots, which
appear as a stream of colored dots depicting the range of variation for a given parameter.
A recent drive test of existing network coverage of the area around the Gold's Gym site was done and the
problems encountered in the key CDMA parameters are noted in the findings below:
Frame Error Rate (FER): This is a measurement of the percentage of signal bit errors reaching the mobile
phone from the cell site, and typical industry standards are 2% or less. FER is the primary indicator of the
quality of network performance, since at high levels the customer experiences degraded voice quality and
may have difficulty placing and receiving calls. The following areas in the vicinity of Gold's Gym were
found to have FER levels between 4% and 10%: Williamsburg Drive, Impala Drive, Hamilton Avenue
(between Eden Ave and Winchester Ave), Payne Ave (between Eden Ave and Winchester Ave),
Campbell Ave (between North Milton Ave and Winchester Ave), North Milton Ave and West Campbell Ave
at Victor Ave. If antennas were lowered, these largely residential areas which are already marginal, would
become worse in terms of poor voice quality and blocked and dropped calls.
Mobile Receive Power - RSSI (Received Signal Strength Indicator): This is a measurement of the
signal strength reaching the mobile phone from the serving cell site/s. Workable Receive Power levels will
vary according to the situational environment of the user. For those users in a building, levels in the range
of -80dBm or stronger, may be needed to ensure reliable service. Users outdoors and in vehicles
require less power, since there is no physical barrier between them and the serving cell site. There are
large areas to the north and northeast of the Gold's Gym site that have Mobile Receive Power levels
weaker than -90dBm. This means that customers in these mainly residential areas would experience
some degree of service degradation if the antennas were lowered. If the received signal level falls too low
(e.g. below -100dBm), the mobile phone is not able to adequately separate the signal from the
background noise and this results signal bit errors (seen as high FER levels) and generally poor system
performance.
Phone Aggregate Ec/lo: This measurement is a ratio of the strength of the serving signal from the cell
site, to the total power of all other signals and background noise. The Ec component represents the energy
in the signal and the to component represents the total background noise. The higher the Ec to to ratio
(i.e. the stronger EGIo level), the easier it is for the mobile phone to distinguish the transmitted signal from
the background noise. Measured EGIo levels will vary according to the number of users being served by a
given sector of the cell site, since the available power must be shared amongst all users. The target EGIo
level for a good signal is typically up to -10d6. Drive test results show that the area northeast of the Gold's
Gym site from Winchester to North Central Avenue, is characterized by low Ec/lo levels in the range -13 to
-15dB, which is borderline for this fairly high traffic area. Lowering the antennas would further aggravate
this situation.
• Page 6
Mobile Transmit Power (Phone Power MTX): This measurement is an indicator of how much power the
mobile phone uses to maintain a connection with the serving cell site. In strong signal areas (where the
received signal strength is high) the phone uses less power and thereby conserves battery life, as stated
previously. The more power a mobile phone uses when engaged in a call, the more background noise is
generated, thus raising the noise floor for that area. In CDMA technology, this has the effect of limiting the
number of users that the cell site can support. A high mobile transmit power is usually evident in areas of
weak signal strengths. This is precisely the case in those areas to the northeast of the Gold's Gym site as
previously mentioned.
Receiver Best Server Ec Aggregate: This is a measurement of the available signal energy from the best
serving cell sites, without taking into account the total power of the background noise. This parameter
gives an indication of the maximum signal strength available at a given location. Receiver Best Server Ec
Aggregate values are weakest (less than -90dBm) in areas northeast and southeast (from Hamilton
Ave/Winchester Ave to Campbell Ave) of the Gold's Gym site and would suffer most from lowering the
antennas.
• Planet Prediction Plots: PlaNet (Network Planning Tool) is an antenna signal propagation software
system designed to calculate and plot expected coverage from a cell site, based on key factors such as
antenna height, region morphology and terrain. The plots show a series of colored regions radiating out
from the cell site, each color representing a different signal strength range.
The first set of Planet plots show the extent of Sprint PCS existing coverage in the City of Campbell and
surrounding areas, with an additional close-up view of the Gold's Gym site (FSO4XC141) and immediate
vicinity.
The second set of Planet plots show the extent of Sprint PCS coverage with the antennas at the Gold's
Gym site lowered aft. A close-up view of the Gold's Gym area is also provided for clarity.
The third set of Planet plots show the extent of Sprint PCS coverage with antennas at all three sites
(Gold's Gym, Sunstone Construction and Sunnyoaks) lowered appropriately to meet the height standards.
It is clear from these plots that there exists a weak area 0.7miles from the Gold's Gym site in the northeast
direction. This area extends from Winchester Blvd between Payne Ave and Hamilton Ave, to Hwy 17 and
beyond. Lowering the antennas at Gold's Gym would result in further service degradation in an already
weak area and add to customer frustration in obtaining a satisfactory level of service from their mobile
phone.
The Planet Prediction plots therefore, confirm the findings of the network drive tests with respect to the RF
signal propagation around the Gold's Gym site. It is the goal of Sprint PCS to provide the highest quality of
service to its customers by keeping the Blocked Call Rate and the Dropped Call Rate as low as possible
through continued enhancements and optimization of the network, thereby increasing customer satisfaction.
This is of vital importance with the coming of 3G technology, when customer expectations will be at its highest.
Therefore lowering the antennas at the Gold's Gym site is not compatible with our stated goals.
All results and plots from the above drive tests
willing and available to review the test results
conclusions.
are stored on-file. Sprint PCS RF Engineering Department is
and predictions with interested parties in support of these
• Page 7
EMS
iti<>Y~r~~s
~~.,~g',
OptiRang®""
~:1~290-17-~:~~DP
2.75" ~ •.
u
~+r
42 "
RF
CONNECTORS
Electrical Mechanical
Aamuth Beamwidth 90° Dimensions (L x W x D} 56in x Bin x 2.T5in
Elevation Beamwidth 6° (142 cm x 20.3 rxn x 7.0 cm)
Gain 16.5 dBi (14.4 dBd) Rated Wind Vekxtity 150 mph (241 kmmr)
Polarization Slant, t45° Equivalent Flat Ptate Area 3.1ft~ (.29 m~
Port-to-Port Isolation > 30 d8 Front Wind Load @ 100 mph (161 kph} 90 Ilx; (400 N)
Front-taBadc Ratio > 25 dB (? 30 dB Typ.) Side Wind Load @ 100 mph (161 kph) 31 Ibs (139 Nj
Electtigl DowntBt Options 0°, 2°, 4°, 6° Weight 181bs (8.2 kg)
VSWR 1.35;1 Max
Connectors 2; 7-16 DIN (female)
Power dandling
250 Watts CW Note: Patent Pending and US Patent number 5, 757, 246.
Passive Intemxxfulation -147 dBc Values and patterns are representative and variations may occur. Speafications may
[2x20W (+43 dBm)] ~~ vrithout notice due to continuous product enhancements. Digitized pattern
Lightning Protection Chassis Ground data is available from the factory or via the web site www.emsvrireless.wm and
reflect all updates,
Model Number Descri tion Comments
MTG-P00-10 Standard Mount Su ied with antenna Mounts to Wall 1.5 inch to 5.0 inch O.D. Pole 3.8 cm to 12.7 cm
MTGS02-10 Swivel Mount Mounti kit vidi azimuth a ' stment.
MTGDXX-20* Mechanical Downtilt Kits 0° -10° or 0° -15° Mechanical Downtilt
MTG-CXX-10* Cluster Mount Kits 3 antermas 120° rt or 2 antennas 180° a rt
MTG-C02-10 U-Bolt Cluster Mount Kit 3 antennas 120° a rt 4.5' O.D. e.
MTGTXX-10* Steel Band Mount Pole diameters 7.5" - 45"
* Model number shown represents a series of products. See mounti options section for specfic model number.
Azimuth Elevation
0° Downtilt
www.emswireless.com
+1 770.582.0555
Elevation
4° Downtilt
Elevation
6° Downtilt
40
Fax +1 770.729.0036
Sprint PCS
Map Showing Existing Sites in the City of
Campbell and Surrounding areas, with relative
distances from Gold's Gym
~ ~ ii ~ ~] ~ J ~ I ~ ~ `~
i~ ~ ~ •~~
=~,~ ~~~~-'.-~~ Maxim Investments C I r I~ ~`' '~ C_
_ ~ ~ : ~ ~~~
~~ ~VL ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ i ~i~. 1~_
'L= ~~ ~' -`- . ~ G4 L~ = - Grocer Mart
~-- ,•_ ~; - ~ -~~ ~, I ~ 1.1 miles ~~ ~
_ I5 ~ S 1•r' ~` o- y~
.Ir ~ ) r~ 1~~ ~ ~ JII - m; Aga iM`•~':
>;<:
-f`~ - 1.2 milesy ~~~.,~~~ 0~l6`z~2~2'. ~ ~r~ i~ o~;,St_I
a ~ ~~Il :;
~c` ~ « 1!~ ~~- 1.3 miles a ~:,, 8~4Y'hs02i68 •
~, .'~~, IGrkwood Sho ~ Plaza G4 r _ _ 7~~~f ~ 5unstone Construction
?~~ ~ •~ - 1.2 miles i ~ ?~ ~, ~. ,_, Ll ~~ rte: '-
-~ ~ ~-~ ~~ = ice= ,~ ~"' i on ~'`'`'• -
iii ~' ~ L_ ~ ~ ,•.~''~~ ~-, 1.5 miles ~~~ ~r7C~ ~~I~t
_ _~~~-~,~, ~~`(I, ~ _ ~~~~~~ ~~ = =ii ~ T~-~`~ ~_ ~ `~1.0 mile '~~ ,~ -:. _
- ~ ~' ar' ~~~~ ~~ '~~ ti v. ~• r`+~ •'
!~ F~ .3 miles i 3ti ~ ,'i~ ;, _ ,~ ni Sun oaks ; , ,<-.,
~ ti
~~-_.
-- . - - ~ -, _ II '~ ,.~ ~~ 1
-_ __i~ •'~5 'ii =~~~ ~ ~,' ` ~~~~ iii .,' rr,~ t Ir~f 'n ~J ,r
~i) -IL- )
_ ~ ? -. -- ;~ ~is'== ' '` ; , Union & Fo
y fsQ4xc15:5_ ~~ ~ ~~ ~' ~~ ~st ~ ~ ' -_r .
~,-~,,_== PG&E Tower Pollard Rd ~, ? ~,~~ l17 f ~--~ 1 ~-~ lfL~, ~~~~~-~ _~
__ ~._ t_.= T ~ i ~.~~~~
~, '~ i~ 51}•i~~~l _-j ~"'--iLi~__,~f~ III f~c~ll ~ r`/L~~ I~ ~~ ~ 1~ --
~ : ~~ „ ~ tip ~ ~ r_ ~~~
ti~ -~=~~ ~ ~~ ~;°_ ~
r ~~
Sprint PCS
Map Showing Additional Sites needed in Campbell if
antennas at the Gold's Gym site were to be lowered
(1 ~. r
~~ „~ _~, _ ~~ ~ ~r~c=r~~ -~ iii ~~~ =~
-,~ rr -} ~ - - ~_ ~ ,ry
(' { , ~ f-1( r+nnn
`r "_ ~ i "~ ~'~ Goid's G m ~ '~ `,'~, ~~
'~Q iU'~- J= -~ ~ ~~ __=_'! ~--, ~ ~ _~ ~` ~ 1, rl~ ~r ~,
~~ti ~'1~ ,I~4 ~ n -~o~-~ ~~ ~5' I_~~
,~c ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~_ ~ : ~ ' x!41 FSOf~GC1158 ,
+~ ~'_i l~, ~ rt ~---' ~ ; { ~; ~ i ~ - ~ ~ ~ - ~_~ ~~ ~ Sunstone Constructic
- ~- r-.,
i=-- ~' C _
'C - ~j i(~ r~~Ii J~~i ~f~~~'\~'\ i i~~~l~ f-~
,~'~~ _. {iii ~~I~' .~ J,.. ~' ' ~r v~ "~ , I i
i ~~ ~i
--
1 i ,~ ~~ '~" ti~ _~ ~
~~ i I i~i ~; ii I' 1 'j' `~ j Sunn Oa~SS _ - - -
~ ~~~ -- r- --_~~"~ _ -
~_' r~ I ~ __- ~ ;' ,
-~ -:
Existing Site ~~~ 1~ ~~~ti', sa =,,i ~ ,~ -~i Irk ~ -~
Additional site needed if antennas ~
are lowered " (; ~ '' ~ ~ ~f~' - ~~ i
~ ' ^' y ~ _ ;
Sprint PCS
Map Showing Additional Sites needed in Campbell if
antennas at the Gold's Gym site were to be lowered
0
r~~
~--ra -
~~ .__.
~t ,, ~ ~ n t ~,, ~u~y Gold's G m
~L"~_ L_I ~-1,
r !!'~~
~ ,5~~~
~,,.. ,, ~ ~ ~ tn~ ,n1 ~ ~=~~
L
II ~~ ~~ ~,~ ~~~~~~tl
i _ ~ _ ~ l !f ~~ I _
~~, _ '~'~
_ !~~( i_
i ~ r~i ~~-`i i ., ~ _ -~ ~ i t `~~ -
~~ ~~ ~~ _
t`1 J JJfff t_
_ _ -~
7i r i- Lam' ~~i y ~, i i . ~
i l~-'~I_ ~~ ~~- ~~
Existing Site I ~ ~ ~ "" _
~~ ~ ~ `_,'~ G4 ~ _
~ ~ i I ~~'~
Additional site needed if antennas , ~ ~ __ =
^ `4'~ '
are lowered ~ .M
~ `, ~,, E
~ ~ '' ~~
oo~~~ ~~ ~~~,~ ~~
i i__
~ ~y ~~
~~
~ ~ LEA
° ``~ I~' 8x41 f504xC168
~_,J~ ~ ~'~-~~ Sunstone Constructic
t~ ~, ~,
t ~
C: ~ / ,,,
__~ f~ r / % ~.__~ ~ i
/~,! % ~~ ~ it i~ ~ _ I
t' r ~
~~ ~.
]y / ~ L _
f
8017 ~SO4xt142 _~ ,y. -~~'
Su oaks '~'s ~'+
(I '-5 r-- ,~-~ r
~~ ~i 'i f
I ' r~ t ~~ - ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ ;~
E 1 4,
~i ~ ~ ~ Ir~.~~~ i~ 'r
~`,
1~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~) 4t ti ~~
~ ,fill ~~
(~r`~~]~
r~~nn
uuJ --
~~ ~ ~~
,~, ~ti '~~~'Lj~~ (-A,,~r~~Y
u -, i~ rl ~.,.
- - -_,,,,,r-
~
~ ~-
~w r
~
~ -
_
_ __
i
_ _
_ __
- -- _, _ ... __ _ Boynton Ave ; i ~
_. _
i_ ~ ~
_.
_._..__.
____ _; _
..
___.
__
a~
- _ -___ ,
• N
_._ . o ~ ---. ~ _
-.---- --.--- _ _ ___ _ co ~
-
,_ ~ ~~ w ~ ~
v e a~
,, -_ ~
_..._-Q-~ ~ ~ I
.•
__ ..__
' ,~
V W
. y
d i _ _... ` ~ _-_. ~ ~ ~ j .... _ _..
~ _ .
> .~. -
C
C
~`
_.. _
_
_
,_ ,
~._`~
. ~
ep
+•
C
- -
~ ~ ~
~
_
i
_ .__ __ _
;
._._
~ -~
C
~ ~ /
fA o .- r~ in ~ ; ~~r~~ ~ n ni
Harrison Ave
~',
_> ~ .
_ __,
__
,
--
~ ,
-,
~
_
~~~.---
,
•
1__
_._. _.. ~._
•~~~
;,
~
~ _.
i . ~- __.
,.
~. _.
_~_
_.
_
,
__
~ -
_-. c ~~ __.
-: • ~,
I
,.-
.
•
~'
,
a
~,
~
'
__ _ __ _.__
_-__
~
,
~., , E ~.------- __
;,,
j,,
' ~, _ _
_.___
N •'
._.~.. 1-_____._..
~
~
-
~ -_._ ,
a
~
_. _ . _. c
Q ~
r
.+ N
C1 ~
C
~ . _....
-, '~ -
'
~
~ .
____
i I
~ ~
_- _
- Q '
C
~ _
,._
_ _._..
i '~
c
c
_ _
~ _ ~ ~
,
, _-_
__-_--
~
--'
`,
~~ ~
_..
___ _ ,
,
----
tA"'
D ~
(/~ stn •- ' _ ... ___
n ~ ~ N
'a _
__
_ _ __.... _ i. _ ~ _.__.
O p
~ p
O ~ ____~ _ _ __..
_._..
`
i
_
_, _~_
_ _.
N
o .X
..__ _ __-_
w
~
o _ _ __ _ _ ---. _ __
; --- -- -- ---
--
U ~'
..
;.
,
X
v~
/
m
...
a~
,,
.,
__
\ `
_ __
- ,_
~ \ \
IL m x. ~ i _ ~
~ - ~
04/08/2002 MON 14:50 FA% 92S 901 1001 RILEY & AS50G. ~ 001
~ Sprint
vra FACS~aKa.~
i.ease 1Nla~nsgalnent
west Ite~i~n
April 8, 2002
Ms. Darcy Sm-ti~
Ciry of Carnpbett Camxttunity Devoe;opapent papartmeat
70 Ivcuth First Street
Campt~eU, CA 95008.1436
RE: kevitw of Approval for Ferssrics UP 96-10 and UP 96-07
Dear Ms. Smith:
Sprint PCS
~1~~3 C1k'~d Utiw~, Syilt l(M7
i•E~~,~,, ra ~S~a
cAPi.MnA1a1
thicT 935 4(~ lAc1U
F:u~ 9?5 4ta9 ~S[.i
Anil ~~r~: 514 b24 slut
This letter cancans the'Revicw of Amoral" of two ezirtiatg Splint 1'CS wiraless cites. t1P 96-10 located ee iZ5 E.
Sunnywkc A~rnue encJ UP 96-07 located er 700 WCtt Hamilton Avenue. Beth pexrnitc contain mandatary
"Reviews of Approval" where the permit maid t+e revisited attar S years to determine if the equipm~t is aousistrnt
with current tcdmology.
Yncu Match 8, 2002 letters addtesced to Ben Daviec of Richard Caouar Ritey & Associates, L.I,,.C. gave Sprint i?CS
30 days to cubiutt a xurtplew applicntian and fees so the UP 96-IO and UP 96-07 could rennin e~'ectivt;. Sprint
PCS zequests aaothQ 30 days (until May 8.2002) to rscparcd to your vutittea regttrsts for applications. pet your
phone canvGrsa4aa 9virh Ben Davies earlier today, Campbell Boas not hswe a pro6iem granting 5priac PCS this
sdditiogal tuY-e.
'Runk you far' your assiat~toe and cooperation.
Sincerely,
1~
g>ye ,
CC. $rn Davit..
~ ~~ z~45 'era wdSZ ~ Z Zooz 'B ~dd~
70 N. First Street, Campbell CA 95008 FAX (408) 866-8381
~~'.~
To: Mark Gagne, Sprint PCS
From: Darcy Smith
Cc: Ben Davies, Richard Conner Riley & Associates, (925) 901-1011
Fax: (925) 468-7325
Phone:
Pages: 2
Date: 4/9/02
Re: Reinstatement of Expired Conditional Use Permits for Sprint Sites
Dear Mr. Gagne
The Planning Division has reviewed your request fora 30-day extension for the
deadline to submit the applications for reinstatements of the expired Conditional Use
Permits No. UP 96-10 and UP 96-07. This extension has been approved. The new
deadline for the submittal of a complete application and fees for the reinstatement of
the expired Conditional Use Permit is May 8, 2002.
I expect that this time will allow Sprint time to prepare a superior design that meets
all the requirements of the City's Telecommunications Facility Ordinance, which was
adopted in 1998. City staff and the Planning Commission do not have any authority
to waive these standards. These include:
Section 21.60.045 (8): Upgrading of Facility Required. If technological
improvements or developments occur which allow the use of materially
smaller or less visually obtrusive equipment, the service provider will be
required to replace or upgrade the approved facility upon application for a
new Use Permit application to minimize adverse effects related to land use
compatibility, visual resources, public safety or other environmental factors.
21.60.070 (4): Roof Mounted. Roof-mounted antennas and associated
equipment shall be located as far back from the edge of the roof as
technically possible to minimize visibility from street level locations. Where
appropriate, construction of a roof-top parapet wall or other appropriate
screening to hide the facility may be required.
(6): Stealthing The applicants are encouraged to consider providing
architectural treatments and to use "stealth techniques" to reduce potential
-. ,
April 9, 2002
visual impacts for all telecommunication facilities, and especially for those
proposed in areas easily visible from a major traffic corridor or commercial
center or in residential areas. Stealth techniques can be required as
Conditions of Approval when determined to be necessary to mitigate
adverse visual impacts.
21.60.140 (5): Minimize Visual Impacts. All roof mounted antennas shall be
located in an area of the roof where the visual impact is minimized. Rooftop
equipment installations shall be setback such that they are not viewed from
the street. Screening panels may be used to mitigate visual impacts but
must be designed to blend with the architecture of the building in terms of
scale, material and color. The cost or inconvenience to provide such
screening of visual equipment shall not by itself provide justification
to install visible equipment or antennas.
(8): Antenna Height. Notwithstanding Subsection 4 of this Section, no roof
mounted antennas. including support structures shall exceed 6 feet
in height above the parapet of the roof.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions about this at (408) 866-
2193.
Thanks,
Darcy Smith
Planner II
City of Campbell
• Page 2
r- OF . GgMA -w
u e~
a
s
f ~;
•~RCH AR~•
CITY of CAMPBELL
Community Development Department -Current Planning
Mazch 8, 2002
Ben Davies
Richazd Conner Riley & Associates
2420 Camino Ramon, Suite 380
San Ramon, CA 94583
Re: Notice of Expiration of Conditional Use Permit No. UP 96-07
Sprint Telecommunications Facility
700 W. Hamilton Avenue
Dear Mr. Davies:
The Planning Division has reviewed your letter submitted on March 6, 2002 requesting an extension
of the above-referenced Use Permit for this site unti12003 to allow for the comprehensive stealthing of
the other roof-mounted telecommunication facilities on the building at 700 W. Hamilton Avenue.
There are two other carriers at the site, PacBell and GTE MobileNet, whose Conditional Use Permits'
expire in June 2003.
Since Conditional Use Permit No. UP 96-07 expired on November 26, 2001, the Conditional Use
Permit cannot be extended by the Community Development Director. The Planning Commission has
the authority to reinstate an expired use permit; however, the antenna facility must meet all the
requirements of the City's Telecommunications Facility Ordinance, which was adopted in 1998.
Specific requirements applying to this facility include:
Section 21.60.045 (8): IJp~rading of Facility Required. If technological improvements or
developments occur which allow the use of materially smaller or less visually obtrusive
equipment, the service provider will be required to replace or upgrade the approved facility
upon application for a new Use Permit application to minimize adverse effects related to land
use compatibility, visual resources, public safety or other environmental factors.
21.60.070 (4): Roof Mounted. Roof-mounted antennas and associated equipment shall be
located as far back from the edge of the roof as technically possible to minimize visibility
from street level locations. Where appropriate, construction of a roof-top parapet wall or
other appropriate screening to hide the facility may be required.
(6). Stealthing The applicants are encouraged to consider providing architectural treatments
and to use "stealth techniques" to reduce potential visual impacts for all telecommunication
facilities, and especially for those proposed in areas easily visible from a major traffic
corridor or commercial center or in residential azeas. Stealth techniques can be required as
Conditions of Approval when determined to be necessary to mitigate adverse visual impacts.
Notice of Expiration of Conditional Use Permit No. UP 96-07
Sprint Telecommunications Facility - 700 W. Hamilton Avenue
March 8.2002 Pase 2
21.60.140 (5): Minimize Visual Impacts. All roof mounted antennas shall be located in an
area of the roof where the visual impact is minimized. Rooftop equipment installations shall
be setback such that they are not viewed from the street. Screening panels may be used to
mitigate visual impacts but must be designed to blend with the architecture of the building in
terms of scale, material and color. The cost or inconvenience to provide such screening of
visual equipment shall not by itself provide justification to install visible equipment or
antennas.
(8): Antenna Height_ Notwithstanding Subsection 4 of this Section, no roof mounted
antennas, including support structures, shall exceed 6 feet in height above the parapet of the
roof.
The Wireless Telecommunications Facility Ordinance requires the facility to meet all these
requirements in conjunction with the reinstatement of the Conditional Use Permit. It does not allow
Sprint to delay screening and stealthing of the facility to wait until the other carriers Use Permits
expire in order to provide a comprehensive stealthing of all three sites at this location. Sprint will be
required to meet the requirements of the Ordinance listed above immediately. Sprint may
independently stealth their facility instead of screening the entire roof.
This letter serves as a notice of 30 days to submit a complete application and fees for the
reinstatement of the expired Conditional Use Permit.
Sincerely,
~l~ ~
Darcy Smith
Planner II
Cc: Geoff Bradley, Senior Planner
Sharon Fierro, Community Development Director
Scott Cooley, Property Owner, 15900 Kennedy Rd, Los Gatos, CA 95032
l a y W. Sun n.c f arllcs fh~eJ
RICHARD CONNOR RILEY & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.
2420 Camino Ramon, Suite 380
San Ramon, California 94583
(925)901-1001
Facsimile (925) 901-1011
March 6, 2002
Via Hand Delivery
Ms. Sharon Fierro
Community Development Duector
City of Campbell
70 North First Street
Campbell, CA 95008
RE: Sprint PCS Wireless Facility at 700 W. Hamilton Avenue File No. M 96-14 (iJP96-07)
Dear Ms. Fierro:
On November 26, 1996 Sprint PCS was granted a Use Permit (via passage of Planning Commission Resolution No.
3055) for the installation and operation of a wireless telecommunications facility located at 700 W. Hamilton
Avenue ("Facility") for a period of five years. November 26, 2001 marked the end of this approved permit.
Before the permit expired I contacted Darcy Smith of your Department and she informed me that there are numerous
other wireless carriers with roof-mounted antennas at 700 W. Hamilton Avenue, whose permits expire in 2003.
After visiting the site I noticed that the roof-mounted antennas of all carriers were not hidden or camouflaged.
Therefore, on behalf of Sprint PCS, I am requesting an extension of the above-referenced Use Permit until 2003 so
all carriers together can request permit extensions that would incorporate complementary stealthing designs that
would benefit the aesthetics of the building.
Resolution No. 3055 requires Sprint PCS to apply for an extension through the Planning Commission (Commission)
and demonstrate that the site's antenna technology is the best available or else upgrade the antennas. Please contact
me at the above number so I can schedule a time to familiarize the Commission with the technology of this site.
Sincerely,
RICHARD CONNOR RILEY & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.
~~
Benja A. Davies
CC: Darcy Smith, Planner II
RESOLUTION N0.3055
BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL APPROVING A MODIFICATION
TO APREVIOUSLY-APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(UP 96-07) TO ALLOW ROOF-MOUNTED CELLULAR
ANTENNAS ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 700 W.
HAMILTON AVENUE IN A C-2-S (GENERAL COMMERCIAL)
ZONING DISTRICT. APPLICATION OF MS. PATTY MEDIA,
ON BEHALF OF SPRINT SPECTRUM. FILE NO. M 96-14 (UP
96-07).
After notification and public hearing, as specified by law, and after presentation by the
Community Development Director, proponents and opponents, the hearing was closed.
After due consideration of all evidence presented, the Planning Commission did find as
follows with respect to application M 96-14 (LDP 96-07):
1. Transceiving or transmitting facilities are permitted in the C-2-S Zoning District
subject to the approval of a conditional use permit.
2. The project is compatible with the existing building and site, subject to the
conditions of approval.
3. The establishment of roof mounted antennas is in the best interest of the
community.
4. Additional landscaping along the easterly property line will provide screening of
the ground level equipment enclosure from public view.
Based upon the foregoing findings of fact, the Planning Commission further finds and
concludes that:
1. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan and the local zoning
ordinance, and
2. The proposed project as conditioned will aid in the harmonious development of the
immediate area;
3. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the use applied for will not be
detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of
persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, or be
detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or to the
general welfare of the City.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3055
M 96-14 (UP 96-07) - 700 W. Hamilton Avenue -Sprint Spectrum
Page 2
The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that he/she is required to meet
the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and
the State of California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is
required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and
the State of California that pertain to this development and are not herein specified.
Anyroved Project: Approval is granted for a Modification to Use Permit 96-07
allowing for the installation of roof mounted cellular antennas on property located at
700 W. Hamilton Avenue. Project approval shall substantially comply with project
plans prepared by Ehrlich Rominger dated 8/28/96 except as modified herein in the
Conditions of Approval.
2. Permits: Applicant shall obtain any permits deemed necessary by the Building
Official or the Uniform Building Code.
Development Approval Expiration: The Modification approval (M 96-14) for this
project is valid for a period of one yeaz from the Planning Commission approval. All
conditions of approval specified herein must be completed within one year from the
date of approval or the Use permit shall be void.
4. Mechanical Equipment: All ground level mechanical equipment which is visible
from the public right of way shall be screened with appropriate materials to screen the
equipment inside the enclosure. The equipment enclosure shall be screened with
landscaping so as not to be visible from public view. Elevations of the enclosure is
subject to the approval of the Community Development Director and required prior to
issuance of building permits.
5. Landscaping: Applicant shall submit a landscaping plan indicating screening of the
equipment enclosure with shrubs, and trees along the easterly property line along with
planting details for and irrigation system to the Community Development Department
for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits.
6. Use Permit Renewal: This Conditional Use Permit shall be valid for a period of five
(5) years. After five years, the applicant must apply for an extension through the
Planning Commission and will be required either to demonstrate that this antenna
technology is still the best available or upgrade the antennas to reflect newer and less
visible technology.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 3055
M 96-14 (UP 96-07) - 700 W. Hamilton Avenue -Sprint Spectrum
Page 2
PASSED A
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTE
ND ADOPTED thi
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Commissioners:
Conunissioners:
s 26'~ day of November, 1996, by the following roll call
Alne, Jones, Kearns, Lindstrom, Lowe, Meyer-
Kennedy
None
Gibbons
None
Sprint PCS
Planet Prediction -Existing Coverage
City of Campbell and Surrounding Areas
Sprint PCS
Planet Prediction -Existing Coverage
City of Campbell and Surrounding Areas
Sprint PCS~
Planet Prediction -Antennas at all 3 sites lowered to
Eft (top) above parapet wall.
City of Campbell and Surrounding areas.
Sprint PCS
Planet Prediction -Antennas at a113 sites lowered to
Eft (top) above parapet wall.
City of Campbell and Surrounding areas.
Sprint PCS
Planet Prediction -Coverage with FSO4XC 141
Gold's Gym Antennas Lowered aft
City of Campbell and Surrounding Areas
Sprint PCS
Planet Prediction -Coverage with FSO4XC 141
Gold's Gym Antennas Lowered aft
City of Campbell and Surrounding Areas
~ vM
V ~
~ ~+' N Q
V o
2
~ " ~
• ~ g
b ~ ~ ~~ A
m n;
A
n ~ C
{b~ r
O ~Y~•,
O
Z
.Z>I
I~1
f
C
>
Q ~
L
_
~tdn
v~
~
>
_
v
rZ~ ~
oSNn
~~;
~ ~
~
~O~ -~
rt~
> o> Cn
y~2
6
~
~ ~
C
4~r Z
{>
-1
Z~
~~
N ~
~
~
f~A
N
(Q
~p
~~
4~~~
U
~7~C~
~~~
O
r
~
"~
>
C
i
n
U Op
>
~ ~
~
; ~~
~
tl ~
11
~ ++
~0~ +
+~~ ``
m p
2
~
j (([
[
O 47
LL~~ ~N~ 1N {{gy~
peN
O CC '
+c ~
~ fZ
l
~ ~ 8 ~
r
-a
2
A
W N Z
O
D >
~ m
m mvcnc~
r*1ym o
~
z ~
~~ ~ O O D Vf ~ 0
Z Z Z=
~, ~' `~ m
-~ m
x
O y
.
Z
0 g
~ ~
m m m m m
n
-~
C
I;_ ~ ~I~
(~ I J N
I ~ ~ ~ I P
r a f N
i
~ !
~~
.n
0
--I
I
ICI I,~~~~~
~'I i ~~~
i-
V ~
+N N
1 o'e
gl8
0
z -~
O n
c ~
~ z
D
r
r
D D
~
.,~ wv
..~
U!
1
c:r)
r, ,_,.,
~.'
~ ~ P.'..
C i.7
r ;-~-,,
a
Oo
0
0
1
0
~~A rn
2 =
~ ,n.,
~ ~
Z ~
n, • `^,
~~
°~~
o~ .
z2
G7 O
Z
m
T
r
C
~ n
~'nw
V/ m
1 Z
~~ V/
m~ Z ~
~0-~
~~ n~ Dmn
nr ~? n2Z
0 r ~
z m
a p
H ~
~- s
co ~
a p
b ~
_,
w y
°o '-
0
z
a
~o
a
O
a N
-~.
b
I
O
K: \DATA\96105\CAD\F506 _141\141-T1 8-28-96 2:11:18 pm
K: \DATA\96105\CAD\FSO6_141\141-C1 8-28-96 2:11; 58 pm
C7
~~
~~
~I
~~ ~~~
~ ~ ~~ ~~ti
i ~i ~~
~~~~~~ ~~
~~~~~ ~~
~~~~~ q~
~qiq~ ~~i
~'~~~~ ~~
~~~8~ ~~
r ~ ~~~ ~M~a F ~~~~~ ~~
e ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~ ~
~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~ q~~! ~~
~~~~~ ~~
i '=a~
'~~~~s ~~
~QO~~ ~
~~~~~~
~~~~~ ~~
q~~~~ ~~
~~~>
:~~~~ ~~
~~~~ ~~,
~~~~ ~~~
~~
,?, as
,~ ;l '
3~ Y~~~ 2 i N N e ~ ~ ~ ~~
ssss ~ $ ~ ~s~ ~ ~~
~~~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~
Q ~ & ~ ~ ~ ~
_~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~g~ ~
~ ~ ~~~ ~~
~~ ~~~ ~
~ a =~~ ~
~~~ ~
~~ ~~
~ti ~~
a ~ ~ a
_~
D
Z
Z
0
y
HAMlL TON A VF:
04
z
t
~D~~956~1~~~~ri°~^~~1~~• o ~
~~~~~Q ~~~~~~~~~~~
~ ~ ~
~~ ~ ~~ ~
~ € Z
i
m
i
V/
<:\OATA\96105\CAD\FS06_141\141-A2 8-28-96 2:07:05 pm
m
a'
~•
o~
H
2
C'f
Z
m
r
m
D
O
Z
`~.r .--~
i ~ -~
~~
_ _~,
z
n
0
0
z
Z
OZC
CN
~Z
~O
~m
6~
z
z
z
z
a
F~
i'
g
N
O
C
r
m
D
O
Z
n
D
~~
~~
~~
~~
~~
O ~L~J
~o o
I LJ I i I l~ I
~~ ~~
0 i (~~~
!~ 1il ~'
i ~~~~ i
D~-~-1 BCD
?~
D ~ L ~J
;~~
~uJ !~
~~ ;~~
0 ~,~
Z
~I~
~~~
~~
z ~~
z
~~
~ m
0 0=
~~
Q ~_
~€
x
~~~
~,,
OX OZC
~_ ~_
~c~ ~c~
Z~ n
~ ~~
~ ~
Z 5~
_ ~_
> >
N N
Z
2
i
i s m ~
~rn
r to
`.
b
~ ~
r __
2 =
_ y
~ n
~
1•'
i
~ N ~
~
~q+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
O
O ~ L_
Z Z ~ 1
~'~'1 ~ /~
"
~~ p
u ~ O
'•O ~ ~ ~ Z
~ ~
~ Z y
~
~ N~
D o
N zz
~ O
~
~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ Z
b
~ ~ ~ ~ ti
~g ~
~
~~-,~ ..
V~
i `~'f ' zm
~`~':.., iii
/-- c
I ,I -..~ oZ
a` f ~-\~/ - Z~
C-
pp~
'O~ ~
/~~
~a~
IF ~
1
-~-~
_--# ~ $
;~
go
00
~~
o`^
I
A~
gg
,~
:\DATA\96105\CAD\FS06_141\141-A2 8-28-96 2:07:05 pm
~
i
i ~
i
~ ~
i
i
i
i i
~ i
i
~ ~J
(('
~~
~~J ~ ~J
i~ ! ~
i~ ~ ~I I
I I
~
J
1'~~ ~~
1'i~
L
~
i ~
~
lr
~
i L~~.J
i~~ I~I'
I
~ L~~ 1
i~
i ~~ ' ~-J
i~~ ~~~~
~~ ~~~
• .o~ ~~m
~~~ Z~
U N ~ ~ n
~~ ~ ~ ~~'~m~~~~~~~~ r
~ ~ ~~
~~ ~ ~ m
J ~ ~ Yi ~ c~ t Z ^+ ~ f/1 D ~
Tn f S g-.° ~~,~ ~Z ~ r~-i
e ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ° ~ ~~ = 70tn mN r m
s ~ ~m ' O> X70 Dm=
I l ~ ~ ~ ° o z~ ~ n r C-=I nSO
> s ti 0 'i D 3 m m r
~ ~ ~ ~ o r°
z
D ~ ~
w ~~ 4 m
~ ~ ~o