Signs - Conoco Phillips - 2005May 31, 2006
Mr. Mark Graff
RHL Design Group. Inc.
1340 Arnold Drive, Suite 110
Martinez, CA 94533
Re: Sign Permit Application
File No: PLN2005-170
3035 S. Winchester Blvd.
Dear Mr. Graff:
The Planning Division has reviewed your sign application for the replacement of existing
signage on the above referenced property. The new signage consists of a new freestanding logo/
price sign (No.9), and a new price sign (No.12), and one canopy mounted sign (No.13).
This Sign Permit has been approved subject to the following conditions of approval:
1. The applicant shall obtain any necessary building/electrical permits from the Building
Division prior to sign installation.
2. The proposed wall signs shall be fabricated and installed per the plans dated as approved on
May 31, 2006.
3. The signs shall be maintained in good condition at all times and shall be repaired or
replaced as necessary.
If you should have any questions regarding the above items or you would like to schedule a
meeting to discuss these items, please contact me at (408) 866-2144 or by email at
timh(a~cityofcarnpbell.com.
Sincerely,
Tim J. Haley
Associate Planner
cc: Jackie C. Young Lind, Senior Planner
Phillips/ Tosco Marketing, Attn: Sandy Matthews, 4957 Lakemont Blvd., Suite C-4 #11,
Bellevue, WA 98006
70 North First Street ~ Campbell, California 95008-1 43 6 ~ 'rrt 408.866.2140 ~ Fnx 408.866.8381 ~ Too 408.866.2790
January 27, 2006
Mr. David Lundy
RHL Design Group. Inc.
3001 Douglas Blvd., Suite 210
Roseville, CA 95661
Re: Architectural Modification Application
File No: PLN2005-170
3035 S. Winchester Blvd.
Dear Mr. Lundy:
The Planning Division has reviewed your application for the installation of an image program to revised
the canopy and service building design on the above referenced property. The proposed imaging is not
supported for the canopy:
1. The proposed red banding of the canopy island is not found to be architecturally compatible with
the site design nor the surrounding development. Corporate architecture is discouraged under the
Campbell's General Plan in that corporate architectural sTyles and colors are difficult to blend
into existing development.
It is recommended that a revised canopy design be proposed that reduces the amount of red banding on
the canopy to 50 square feet in area with the addition of the 76 Logo and that the remaining portion of the
canopy retain the primary wall color of the main building.
The paint stripes of the main building are considered acceptable.
If you should have any questions regarding the above items or you would like to schedule a meeting to
discuss these items, please contact me at (408) 866-2144 or by email at timh~a cityofcampbell.com.
Sincer
Tim J. Haley l/
Associate Planner
Encl: Applicable Section of General Plan LUT-29
cc: Jackie C. Young Lind, Senior Planner
Phillips/ Tosco Marketing, Attn: Sandy Matthews, 4957 Lakemont Blvd., Suite C-4 #11, Bellevue, WA 98006
J:\Reports\Site & Arch\PLN2005-170 3035 S. Winchester Blvd. -Denial Image.doc
70 North First Street ~ Campbell, California 95008-1 43 6 ~ Tee 408.866.2140 ~ FAx 408.866.8381 ~ TDU 408.86b`.2i90
December 22, 2005
Mr. David Lundy
RHL Design Group. Inc.
3001 Douglas Blvd., Suite 210
Roseville, CA 95661
Re: Sign Permit Application
File No: PLN2005-171
3035 S. Winchester Blvd.
Dear Mr. Lundy:
The Planning Division has reviewed your sign application for the replacement of existing signage on the
above referenced property. The new signage consists of a new freestanding sign and price sign (No.9), a
new price sign (No.12) ,two canopy mounted signs (No.13) and a new building sign (No.10). The
proposed signing exceeds number and height provisions of the attached sign ordinance and consequently
is not supported. A review the sign proposal follows:
1) The proposed freestanding sign exceeds the maximum height limit of 14 feet and is not
considered to be architecturally compatible to the site or the building. Additionally, the price
portion of the sign exceeds the maximum sign area of 16 square feet provided in the sign
ordinance.
2) Two canopy signs are proposed on the island structure. Corner properties are limited to one wall
sign when the use is also identified by a freestanding sign. Consequently, the number of wall
signs exceeds the provision of the sign ordinance.
3) The new building sign identifying 76 is in excessive of the number of signs permitted by the sign
ordinance.
4) The new price sign exceeds the 16 square foot limitation permitted in the sign ordinance.
If you should have any questions regarding the above items or you would like to schedule a meeting to
discuss these items, please contact me at (408) 866-2144 or by email at timh(a~ci ofcampbell.com.
Since
....._~
Tim J. Haley
Associate Planner
Encl: Sign Ordinance
cc: Jackie C. Young Lind, Senior Planner
Phillips/ Tosco Marketing, Attn: Sandy Matthews, 4957 Lakemont Blvd., Suite C-4 # 11, Bellevue, WA 98006
70 North First Street ~ Campbell, California 95008-1436 ~ TF[. 408.566.214(1 ~ Fns: 408.866.8381 ~ Ti~i> 408.860.2790