ABAG Projections - 2000ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS
Representing City and County Governments of the San Francisco Bay Area ~,(,d~Q JN~NNt/ld A BAG
1~38dWb'~ ~0 Ally
66fit 8 0 d3S
Date: September 3, 1999 ~~~~~~~~~
To: County, City, and Town Planning Directors
From: Paul Fassinger, Research Director
Re: Review of Preliminary Projections 2000 Population, Household, and Employment
Forecasts
As many of you know, ABAG updates its Projections series every two years. These forecasts are
used by local planning departments, congestion management agencies, regional and state agencies,
and by the private sector for investment decisions. Because this information is so widely used, we
encourage your careful review and comments on the attached preliminary forecasts.
Uncertainty is inherent in any projections process, and ours is no different. Varying opinions about
potential growth will occur. We try to follow as closely as possible the constraints of local
development policies for the short term. Over the long term (greater than ten years), our forecasts
assume that economic conditions and population pressure can affect policy strategies of some local
communities. Your review and comments on the forecasts are essential so that we can give you the
best possible estimates of the future growth at the local level.
The Projections cover the period 2000-2020 and incorporate all available Census demographic
information in the 1990 base year and estimates for 1995. In addition, employment data are
benchmarked using zip code and Census tract data from the Bureau of Census and the California
Employment Development Department to provide you with the best estimate of current
employment.
Projections 2000 will mark the first time that we will have separate data for subregional study
areas and for jurisdictional boundaries.
The Local Review Period will end on October 8, 1999.
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 2050 Oakland, California 94604-2050 (510) 464-7900 Fax: (510) 464-7970 info@abag.ca.gov
Location: Joseph P. Bort MetroCenter 101 Eighth Street Oakland, California 94607-4756
We welcome your review and strongly encourage written comments. They should be addressed to:
Paul Fassinger, Research Director
Association of Bay Area Governments
P.O. Box 2050
Oakland, CA 94604
Phone requests for assistance should be directed to the following individuals:
Population and Household Forecasts
(Alameda, Contra Costa, San Francisco,
San Mateo, and Santa Clara Counties)
Hing Wong (510) 464-7966
Population and Household Forecasts
(Marin, Napa, Solaro, and Sonoma Counties)
Employment Forecasts
Brian Kirking (510) 464-7996
Paul Fassinger (510) 464-7928
After comments have been received and reviewed, the preliminary estimates will be revised and the
Projections 2000 document issued. Each member government will receive a complimentary copy
of the latest forecast.
We look forward to hearing from you.
Prelimilnary Economic and Demographic Projections
Association of Bay Area Governments
September 1999
Attached are the preliminary long-term economic and demographic projections for the cities of the
San Francisco Bay Region. The Projections will be officially released in December in the document
Projections 2000. The base year for the Projections is 1995, and the forecast extends in 5-year
increments to 2020. 1990 figures are included to allow comparison with census time periods.
Short-Term Forecast
We follow local policies in the short term as closely as possible in allocating household growth
needed to meet the economic growth. Therefore, in the short term (less than ten years), ABAG's
forecasts reflect the aggregate of local development policies in the region.
Long-Term Forecast
In the long term, staff recognizes that policies change; the intensification of land use does occur; and
the distribution of growth may shift. Therefore, forecasts of minimal housing needs (i.e.,
households) may exceed present local development policies. in this series of forecasts, we exceed
local development potential based on current policies in some jurisdictions after the year 2005.
Caveat for Small Area Projections
Realistically, small area projections are more difficult to produce. Therefore, we recognize that these
estimates of local growth could substantially change over time at the community level.
REGIONAL HIGHLIGHTS:
Economic Growth
There are two significant changes between Projections 98 and Projections 2000. First, we have
adjusted 1990 and 1995 employment to better reconcile census jobs identified in the 'journey to
work tabulation' and data from the California State Employment Development Department and the
Department of Commercials County Business Patterns. Second, the high rate of recent job growth
has prompted us to generally increase our estimates of the year 2000 employment, even as job
growth has began to ease in the last few months. While these are general trends, specific areas may
vary. Overall, changes in the early years have "ratcheted up" the forecast.
Population
Population growth forecasts are also seeing some changes in future years. The 1990 and 1995
numbers are generally unchanged. Two of the factors controlling population growth, birth and
deaths are relatively unchanged from our previous forecast but assumed migration has increased in
the short term. This is because employment is one of the most important factors atvacting migrants
to a region. While a return to more historical growth rates is expected after about 2005, changes in
the early years again "ratchet up" our forecast.
Identification of Subregional Swdy Areas
The asterisks geographically identify each community in the attached forecast as follows:
* City
* * City Sphere of Influence
* * * Urban Service Area
* * * * Other Subregional Swdy Area
In most cases, the subregional study areas correspond to the Local Agency Formation Commissions'
adopted spheres of influence as of 1999. in some cases urban service areas have not been adopted,
city boundaries are usually used to define the Swdy area. Other subregional Swdy areas represent
proposed city LAFCO spheres; the city and part of its LAFCO sphere (e.g., Daly City includes that
part of the city which is within Brisbane's sphere); city planning area; unincorporated urban places
outside city spheres; or unincorporated rural areas with significant concentrations of populations,
households or jobs. The "remainder" areas in seven counties (all except San Francisco and Sonoma)
correspond to the remaining unincorporated territory outside all other subregional Swdy areas.
ABAG PROJECTIONS 2000: Q. 8L A. FACT SHEET
1. WHAT IS THE BASIS OF ABAG's PROJECTIONS?
Projections are ABAG's biennial forecast of future population, household and employment growth,
at 5-year increments based on modeling, which allows for the interaction of regional supply and
demand factors.
Supply Side Information
Information on vacant or underused land and local development policies serves as a primary supply
side input to Projections. This information is collected from local jurisdictions. Limited resources do
not allow an update of local development potential for every city with every Projections series. We
try to identify areas undergoing the highest rates of change, relying on local jurisdictions to provide
us with data on vacant and redevelopment land supply as well as policy changes and growth and
infrastructure constraints.
The amount and location of vacant developable land serves as both asupply-side constraint (limiting
where development can be assigned) and also as an "attractor" of the aggregate demand (attracting
development location to that zone). This statement is especially true in the near term (1995-2000
and 2000-2005). However, we do not let the model overcome supply-side constraints in many
instances, and especially in the long term. -
Demand Side Information
ABAG's forecasu also involve a set of assumptions about the Bay Area and national economies, the
labor force, demographic changes, transportation, etc. These factors drive the demand side of the
projections process. Assumptions for each indicator are developed based on a review of available
federal, state, and private information resources. Following is a list of major indicators:
National Economic Indicators
• annual growth rate of GNP by industry sector
• commercial interest rate
Regional Economic indicators
growth rates in exports by industry sector
mortgage interest rate
price of energy
output per worker by industry sector
consumer spending by industry sector
real growth in capital spending by industry sector
commercial interest rate
Regional Demographic Indicators
• growth in labor force participation
• fertility rates
• changes in household size
These assumptions drive the projected region wide growth. Countywide forecasts are prepared using
a model that considers historical growth trends and relationships between employment sectors.
However, the regional and countywide forecasts are not simply a historical extrapolation of trends.
Once the country growth forecasts are obtained, the county total is `allocated' to jurisdictions based
•
on a model that takes into account the availability of vacant and underused land and attractiveness
factors (e.g., proximity to transportation, and the existing level of development activity in the zone).
"Raw" model outputs are then compared to historical trend data as a subjective check of
reasonableness.
2. WHAT ARE THE PROJECTIONS INTENDED TO REPRESENT?
The forecasts are intended to represent expected growth for the region to the year 2020. They do
NOT represent ahigh-end forecast. Projections 2000 shows stronger regional growth in the early
years, and slower growth in the later part of the forecast period. subregional projections should not
be interpreted as either a floor or a ceiling on growth. The best predictive capacity of the
Projections is for the region as a whole, followed by the county-level projections. Sub-county and
small area projections are subject to considerable uncertainty, particularly in area undergoing rapid
or unanticipated changes.
3. WHY DON'T ABAG's NUMBERS MATCH THOSE IN LOCAL PLANS?
Local General Plans document the goals, policies and objectives of local jurisdictions; as such, they
are often described as the constitution of the local planning process. Moreover, they contain a
vision of a desirable future for the local area. But individual local plans are not a forecast of local
development. They do not necessarily reflect economic conditions or the subregional ability as well
as pressure to absorb new development. For example, local plans, taken together, often include a
higher level of job-producing land uses than can be realistically absorbed at a subregional level.
Also, the focus of the General Plan is on the local community or county. ABAG's responsibility is
to look at the sum of all the local plans and policies, as well as local, regional, and national economic
and demographic trends, and to develop a set of forecasts. A simple aggregation of local General
plans would assist jurisdictions in assessing the actual likelihood of future development.
It is worth noting however, that ABAG's projections can be used by local jurisdictions as an
indication of what additional steps they may want to take to steer their community towards a future
that is different from the projections, or fulfillment of the goals in their General Plan.
4. HOW AND WHEN DO CITIES AND COUNTIES PROVIDE INPUT INTO
PROJECTIONS?
Local jurisdictions have significant opportunities to provide input into Projections. The following are
the key-points of local input:
Local Policy Survey Data
ABAG maintains a database of vacant and
redevelopable land supply. It includes
information on acreage, planned land use, density,
phasing and infrastructure and environmental
constraints. Data for each community is
periodically summarized and circulated to the
Planning Department for review and comment.
Review of Correspondence Table
Jurisdictions review and are asked to comment on
the census tract correspondence table (see also
No. 6).
Review of Preliminary Projections Preliminary projections are distributed for review
and comment to local planning departments along
with explanatory information. Ail written
comments, as well as staff responses are
documented and are available for review.
5. WHY DOES ABAG TYPICALLY USE THE SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AS tTS
PLANNING AREA?
The incorporated limits for many cities are subject to relatively frequent change. The current
Projections series extends out to the year 2020. Therefore, the projections must reflect the long-
term boundaries of the jurisdiction. The sphere of influence (SOI), as established by the LAFCO, is
defined as "the probable ultimate physical boundaries and service area of a local agency or district."
As such, the SOI is often the most logical geographic area to use for future projections. In
Projections 2000, we will also be providing an alternative description of the forecast based on
current city boundaries.
6. WHAT IS THE "CORRESPONDENCE TABLE"?
The correspondence table identifies how census tract level projections are assigned to tracts that
straddle two or more planning areas. The table includes existing conditions (the 1995 value), and
the future splits (the 2020 value). The correspondence table is regularly circulated for local review
and comment. For intermediate five-year increments, ABAG interpolates between the current and
end-year percentages, unless the local jurisdiction helps us to identify an alternate rate of change.
7. WHAT IMPLICTIONS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECTIONS?
• State directive stipulates that the regional planning agencies' Projections can be used to
identify needed levels of construction for sewage treatment plants, transportation facilities,
and other capital facilities;
• The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and the countrywide congestion
management agencies (CMAs) use ABAG's economic-demographic Projections in
developing their travel demand forecasts (which in turn, are used to prioritize transportation
improvements);
• The Projections must serve as the basis for congestion management and air quality planning
purposes;
• The Projections are used for planning purposes by government and private entities needing a
sense of future conditions; and
• The Projections influence the housing needs determination (discussed below).
S. WHAT IS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PROJECTIONS AND ABAG's
HOUSING NEEDS DETERMINATIONS?
Jurisdictions often ask how the Projections will affect their housing needs allocation. Under state
mandate, ABAG has the responsibility to identify housing needs targets for use in preparing local
housing elements. The housing needs determinations are separate and distinct from the Projections,
however, the near-term household growth forecasts will be an important component in assigning the
housing "growth" need.