Loading...
1988 DT Dev PlanORDINANCE N0. 1733 BEING AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA, TO ADDRESS LAND USE POLICIES IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA (CITY-INITIATED APPLICATION, GP 88-02). The City Council of the City of Campbell does ordain as follows: SECTION ONE: That the Land Use Element of the General Plan of the City of Campbell, together with amendments thereto, is hereby changed and am~,nded as per Exhibit A, attached hereto. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective 30 days following its passage and adoption and shall be published once within 15 days upon passage and adoption in the San Jose Mercury News, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Campbell, County of Santa Clara. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28th day of November, 1988 by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers: KOTOWSKI, ASHWORTH, BURR, WATSON NOES: Councilmembers: NONE ABSENT: Councilmembers: NONE • 'PROVED : ~'`~<_.___~---~ anette Watson, Mayor ATTEST: LAND USE ELEMENT PROPOSED AMENDMENTS), A. Goals/Objectives. Add Section 6, as follows: EXHIBIT "A of ordinance for GP 88-02 6. To identify the downtown, commercial core as an area requiring special land use policies and development standards. B. Policy Implementation Matrix Chantte 4. to read as follows: 4. The land use policies and design standards specified in the "Campbell Downtown Development Plan" shall be used as a guide for _ ~ development in the downtown area. Department/Agency Responsible for Implementation (a) Redevelopment Agency/Redevelopment Director (b) Other Departments and Agencies within the City as directed by the City Manager. F. Policy for the Downtown Area. (New) The "Downtown Area" of Campbell is generally defined as that area surrounded by Civic Center Dr. and Orchard City Dr. This area is the subject of a Specific Plan, known as the Campbell Downtown Development Plan, which was adopted on January 11, 1988 by the Redevelopment Agency. The plan identifies specific land uses for the downtown area as well as parking, design, and signing standards that are different for the downtown area than for the rest of the City. By adopting the Campbell Downtown Development Plan, the City is recognizing the special character of the downtown area, its potential, and its problems. Implementation of this downtown plan will be accomplished through special toning for the area which is consistent with the plan, and other actions by the Redevelopment Agency. f:landuse Campbell Downtown Development Plan PREPARED FOR: CAMPBELL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PREPARED BY: WURSTER, BERNARDI AND EMMONS, INC. JOHN B. DYKSTRA & ASSOCIATES FEHR & PEERS ASSOCIATES RECHT HAUSRATH & ASSOCIATES FEBRUARY, 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1: INTRODUCTION Background ...........................................................................................................1 Existing Conditions .............................................................................................. 3 PART 2: GOALS AND POLICIES General .................................................................................................................. 7 Circulation ............................................................................................................ 7 Parking ............ ..................................................................................................8 Land Use and Development ................................................................................. 9 Urban Design ........................................................................................................9 Implementation and Funding ............................................................................11 PART 3: CIRCULATION PLAN Background .........................................................................................................13 Vehicular Circulation Plan ................................................................................14 Pedestrian Circulation Plan ...............................................................................18 Public Transit ............................................:........................................................20 PART 4: PARKING PLAN Background ......................................................................................................... 23 Revised Parking Ratios .......................................................................................25 Expanding the Parking Supply ..........................................................................27 Parking Provision and Management .................................................................. 2 7 LIST OF DIAGRAMS Diagram 1 Study Area Boundary .............................................................................2 Diagram 2 Possible Alternative Access Improvements from Highway 17 ..................................................................................15 Diagram 3 Vehiculaz Circulation Plan ...................................................................17 Diagram 4 Pedestrian Circulation Plan ..................................................................19 Diagram 5 Potential Transit Station Sites .............................................................. 21 Diagram 6 Existing Downtown Pazking Supply .................................................... 24 Diagram 7 Future Public Parking Resources .........................................................29 Diagram 8 Downtown Pazking Zones ....................................................................30 Diagram 9 Land Use Concept ................................................................................. 34 Diagram 10 Special Land Use Requirements ..........................................................35 Diagram 11 Downtown Development Standazds ....................................................37 Diagram 12 Urban Design Concept Plan ..................................................................45 Diagram 13 Campbell Avenue -Partial Plan ...........................................................46 Diagram 14 Campbell Avenue -Section ...................................................................47 Diagram 15 Public Plaza -Plan ................................................................................48 Diagram 16 Landscaped Setback .............................................................................50 Diagram 17 Highway 17 Connection- Section ........................................................50 Diagram 18 Central Avenue Section ......................................................................51 Diagram 19 Pedestrian Way -Section ......................................................................52 Diagram 20 Pedestrian Way -Plan ...........................................................................53 Diagram 21 Alleyway -Section ................................................................................54 Diagram 22 Directory of Public Improvements ....................................................... 56 Diagram 23 Building Conservation ..........................................................................59 Diagram 24 Property Acquisition ............................................................................ 78 Diagram 25 Redevelopment Agency Organization Chart .......................................80 Diagram 26 Phase One: Short Term Implementation Strategy ..............................84 Diagram 27 Phase Two: Mid-Term Implementation Strategy ...............................85 Diagram 28 Phase Three: Long Term Implementation Strategy ............................86 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Current and Revised Parking Ratios for Individual Developments .......................................................................... 26 Table 2 Revised Parking Ratios with Reduction for Shared Use ................................................................................................: 26 Table 3 Projected Increase in Parking Supply with Development of Public Parking Resources ............................................... 29 Table 4 Downtown Development Standards Summary ........................................ 40 Table 5 Public Improvements Preliminary Cost Estimates ................................... 88 Table 6 Master Implementation Schedule ............................................................. 90 Table 7 Total Projected Funding Requirements by Phase .................................... 92 Table 8 Demonstration Funding Program by Phase .............................................. 94 PART 1: INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND The preparation of this Downtown Development Plan marks the completion of over one and one-half years of study and discussion of planning and revitalization issues in downtown Campbell. This plan was prepared for the Campbell Redevelopment Agency by an interdisciplinary team of consultants headed by the firm of Wurster, Bernardi and Emmons, architects and planners. Fehr & Peers Associates provided traffic analysis and planning, and Recht Hausrath & Associates served as economic and marketing consultants. The implementation and funding strategy was developedby John B. Dykstra & Associates. All four consultants worked closely with city staff, the Citizens' Advisory Committee, interested property owners and members of the general public to develop this plan. Purpose of the Downtown Development Plan Downtown Campbell is centered on East Campbell Avenue in the area outlined by the "loop" roads, Civic Center Drive and CMchard City Drive, an area which encompasses approximately nine blocks (Diagram 1). This downtown core area is part of a larger redevelopment area which includes approximately 260 acres. The redevelopment area extends west as far as the community center and stretches east to include most of the Southern Pacific Railroad corridor through the northern half of the city. The downtown area, therefore, is considered a specific project area within the greater redevelopment area. This Downtown Development Plan has been prepared to outline and implement a specific redevelopment program for downtown Campbell. Its provisions apply to the area encompassed by the loop roads, also referred to as the downtown core area. However, specific recommendations may apply to special sites immediately adjacent to the downtown core. Issues of particular concern which have been identified and addressed through the planning process include the following: • Maintenance of a retail focus for downtown. • Preservation of significant historic and architectural resources. 1 and public action programs were presented to the Advisory Committee and then discussed with the City Council and Planning Commission in a joint work session. Two of the alternatives were the subject of further study along with a third which called for a level of change in between the two most ambitious alternatives. Following further development and evaluation, this hybrid alternative was eventually selected as the basis for the Development Plan. Phase 3 of the planning process was devoted to the drafting and refinement of the various elements of the Development Plan: • Goals and Policies • Circulation Plan • Parking Plan • Land Use Plan and Development Standazds • Urban Design Plan ' • Implementation and Funding Plan Use of the Downtown Development Plan Upon its adoption in February of 1988, the Downtown Development Plan became a~ policy document of the city and the Redevelopment Agency. Both the city and the Agency have major responsibilities in implementing the plan. The plan will be used to guide public actions ranging from property acquisition, relocation and site clearance to the implementation of zoning changes and administration of design guidelines and development standards. In addition, it will provide guidance to private property owners, tenants and developers interested in undertaking changes or new projects in the downtown azea. The policies and public actions outlined in the Plan will help to achieve the physical revitalization of downtown Campbell and will aid in restoring economic health to the area. However, the success of the plan will depend on two factors: the public sector's ability to successfully implement it in a timely manner and the private sector's willingness to participate and take the initiative where appropriate. EXISTING CONDITIONS The nine block area which comprises downtown Campbell has declined in importance and vitality as the city's retail focus over the years. Historically, this stretch of East Campbell Avenue, especially between Second Street and the railroad, provided a full range of retail and commercial services. The closure of the fruit packing plants and the rise of strip commercial developments along Winchester Boulevard and Hamilton Avenue have contributed to the downtown's decline as a retailing area. Although the western and outer edges of downtown have experienced some new development in recent times, it is principally office uses which have moved in. These uses, though desirable from many aspects, do not contribute to a lively, pedestrian 3 All of the above factors were evaluated over the course of the planning effort. The mazket opportunities and constraints have strongly influenced the recommendations regarding land use and development. The strengths and weaknesses of the existing circulation system and traffic patterns were cazefully considered before recommending changes in these areas. The availability of convenient pazking for current and future users was carefully evaluated prior to recommending an expansion of the supply. The level of pedestrian and urban design amenities in the downtown was weighed against what would be desirable and effective in attracting pedestrians. And the availability of funds from both public and private sources was taken into account in developing the implementation and funding program. , Intent and Major Concepts The Downtown Development Plan is based on a number of basic concepts which are intended to guide the implementation process. These concepts, listed below, should remain intact even though the details of the plan or its implementation may change. 1. Enhancement of downtown as a destination for local residents. 2. Improvement of access to downtown from Highway 17 to the north. 3. A reduction in unnecessary through traffic in the downtown core. 4. Provision for adequate future pazking. 5. An increase in pedestrian safety and amenities. 6. The enhancement of downtown's image and attractiveness to pedestrians by building on positive features, especially scale and historic resources. 7. The provision of mechanisms for implementation of recommended policies and programs. Each of the major elements of the plan is presented in one of the six sepazate parts of the report which follows. PART 2: GOALS AND POLICIES GENERAL Goals: A. To retain and enhance the downtown as a unique retail environment. B. To enhance downtown Campbell as an economically viable retail and business center. Policies: 1. The focus of downtown busincss shall be primarily on local and community commcrcial nccds with an cmphasis on maintaining and cnhancing rctail activity. 2. Land use rcgulations shall be structurcd to allow an cconomically viablc nuxturc of rctail, commcrcial officc and scrvicc uscs. CIRCULATION Goals: A. To improvc cast and clarity of access to the downtown arcs. B. To adcquatcly handlc intcrnal circulation without allowing through traffic to adverscly affcct the rctail environmcnt. C. To improvc the pcdcstrian cnvironmcnt to providc bcttcr access and safcty. D. To maintain flcxibility to accommodate futurc transit nccds within Downtown Campbcll. Policies: 1. Campbcll Avcnuc shall be maintaincd as a one-way strcct with convcnicnt on-strcct 'parking and pedcstrian/landscapc amcnities. 7 6. On-strcct pazking on Campbcll Avcnuc shall be maintaincd in a parallcl rathcr than diagonal configuration to allow for flcxibility in rcvcrsing traffic flow. 7. All pazking facilitics shall be cazcfully dcsigncd, attractivcly landscapcd and wcll main- taincd with a minimum of 20°~ of the sift arcs dcvotcd to landscaping. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT Goals: A. To strongly cncourage ground floor retail use. B. To promotc a compatiblc mix of uscs in the downtown. C. To cstablish dcvclopmcnt intcnsirics consistcnt with the scalc of the downtown arcs and the amount ofparlcing which can be accommodatcd within and adjaccnt to it. D. To rcinforcc Campbcll Avcnuc as a pcdcstrian-oricnted rctail strcct. Policies: 1. Land use zoncs shall be cstablishcd to promotc uscs which azc both cconomically viablc x and contributc to the vitality and pcdcstrian oricntation of downtown. 2. The azca cast of Sccond Strcct shall be dcsignatcd as the primary rctail tort azca with ground floor uscs which contributc strongly to rctail continuity, cspccially along Campbcll Avcnuc. The azca wcst of Sccond Strcct shall be dcsignatcd as a mixcd use azca whcrc a high quality mix of profcssional officcs, scrviccs and rctail uscs is cncouragcd. 4. Buildings facing Campbcll Avcnuc shall be dcsigncd without sctbacks or scparation to maintain a continuous wall of buildings and promotc a morc activc pcdcstrian-oricntcd retail environmcnt. 5. The city shall rc-cxaminc currcnt planning rcgulations and standazds for arras adjaccnt to downtown, cspcdally on the castcrn cdgcs, to cnsurc that proposcd dcvclopmcnt will complcmcnt and cnhancc downtown vitality.. URBAN DESIGN Goals: A. To incrcasc downtown idcntity as a retail ccntcr and mccting placc for local residents. B . To maintain the comfortablc scalc and charactcr of a small town business district. C. To preservc and cnhancc significant historic buildings within downtown. 9 13. A coordinatcd color schcmc shall be dcvclopcd for cach building. 14. Fabric awnings ovcr windows andcntrics shall be cncouragcd. - 15. The cxisting two foot allowancc for the cncroachmcnt of awnings and projccting signs into the public right-of--way along Campbcll Avcnue shall be incrcascd. 16. All signs shall be crcativc, of good quality and dcsigncd by a profcssional graphic dcsigncr. 17. Spccial dcsign guidelincs for signing shall apply in addition to, cxisting adoptcd sign rcgulations. - 18. The cxisting ovcnc~ad utilitics shall be undcrgroundcd for the lcngth of Campbcll Avcnuc through downtown. IMPLEMENTATION AND FUNDING Goals: A. To cncouragc rcvitalization and dcvclopmcnt through both public and privatc scctor actions and invcstmcnts. B. To dcvclop an affordablc program of public improvcmcnts to support and cncouragc privatc invcstmcnt in the downtown. C. To protect and cncouragc privatc invcstmcnt by insuring that adjaccnt improvc- mcnts arc of high quality. D. To cstablish a comprchcnsivc program of public actions to support and coact the politics and programs of the Downtown Dcvclopment Plan. Policies: 1. The city shall support and cncouragc cfforts to organizc a downtown busincss association. 2. If formcd, the downtown busincss assodation shall be cncouragcd to assumc responsibil- ity for maintcnance of privatc propcrtics and organizing cfforts for joint promotion. 3. The city shall prepare a spccial zoning district for downtown as ncccssary to coact the politics of the plan. 4. Formation of a new parking district shall be considcrcd. The district would cncompass additional propcrtics in the arcs boundcd by Civic Ccntcr Drivc and Orchard Ciry Drivc that arc not currcntly includcd in the cxisting parking district. 11 PART 3: CIRCULATION PLAN BACKGROUND Traffic circulation around the downtown core area is good. However, regional access to downtown from Highway 17 to the north is indirect and difficult, especially for first time visitors. This Circulation Plan is intended to improve regional access to the downtown, maintain the diversion of through traffic azound the downtown core azea and improve pedestrian circulation and safety to and within the core area. Regional Access Downtown Campbell is served by two major regional highways, Freeway 17 on the east and the San Tomas Expressway on the west. While downtown is directly accessible from the San Tomas Expressway via Campbell Avenue, there is no interchange on Highway 17 at Campbell Avenue. Instead, downtown traffic to and from the north has to use the Hamilton Avenue Interchange. Traffic to and from the south uses the Camden Interchange and Winchester Boulevazd. Although downtown Campbell is, in an area-wide context, centrally located in the region, access from Highway 17 is not conveniently direct. Traffic using the Hamilton interchange must travel a circuitous route via Belmar and Harrison Avenues to and from downtown. Frequent and sharp turns, industrial traffic, substandazd roadway improvements and conflicts with the railroad make this route somewhat difficult to use. The other option, using Hamilton Avenue and Winchester Boulevazd, is considerably longer. Use of more direct routes from Hamilton to downtown such as via Harrison and Central Avenues is discouraged since these streets pass through well-established residential azeas. The construction of a full or partial interchange at Highway 17 and Campbell Avenue has been studied in the past. However, the lack of appropriate right-of--way, the closeness to the Hamilton Interchange (1/2 mile), and lack of funding aze reasons why this proposal is no longer under consideration. 13 -- I _.. ~. -a ~r~~T OM ^~ Pvt. l~ - -, -u ~ N„ ' ~~w += V S'~~~1 ~; '„^ y ,..~ , ~ ~ _ ~ .. ~~ I ~ .: '- J~ ~ •_~ ,~_ ~~ ~I New Traffic Siq~tpl T a~ .. .I i ~"'1+--~-~I r~- =~-~~'] Irlt.e,rim Im r v mOnts to Harris Q.L3 Imar Routs on ; Campbell Downtown ~- Development Plani...~ i~ I ~a , /j F' T > ~_~ ~/. ~ ,; ` Fysure,llnpr,pvsd Ac ess -Option 1 L .,41i- ~a ; I I Orad ~ Ss aration .~~ I ~_ J ,, Future Improved AC .es~ Op ion 2 LL ~~ i• ~ .... .... ~r ~ ~ ' ~' .% ~ POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVE ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS FROM HIGHWAY 17 Diagram 2 Note: Exact Location and Type of Mnprovements Subject to Fis'thsr Detailed Study The exact location and type of improvements required under these or other options would require further detailed study prior to selecting a preferred alternative. In addition, alternative routes should be cazefully studied in the context of changes in the industrial azea and existing residential neighborhoods north of downtown. In the interim, the City should take steps to insure that future options aze not foreclosed by redevelopment along any of the routes under study, until a final route is selected and the necessary right-of--way is secured. Improvement of the access from Highway 17 to downtown may necessitate other improvements in downtown traffic circulation patterns. Specifically, once the improved access route becomes heavily utilized it maybe appropriate to reverse the direction of travel on Campbell Avenue from eastbound to westbound. This change would in turn call for a new traffic signal at the west end of Civic Center Drive. Timing and implementation of these improvements should be determined by periodic monitoring of the Harrison/Salmaz route. 15 j ~~ r -- _ + L__I w ~ . • • • • fad a •!• • • • e! O_~ v ~ E4 ~_ E•_• • • • ~ • •~ • •~ + ' _ • I •• ~ ~~... C ~1;~. • • arara~ ~` • ~ •.• ^ ~ ~ iii • • • • • • • ~aiwuuaunim~~nnouia ~ m_~n_uiu~ow~0uwwswuitoidunoinwnu t11'11"'/1'1~ •~ • • s • ~ ^~ • - ~ . '•Q Campbell Downtown o ~ " ~~~~: ~ ` ;~ O Development Plan ~ ,f- ,: 0 100 200 )00 feel ® / ~ 6 7~ Y ~~ VEHICULAR CIRCULATION PLAN Diagram 3 • • • Through TnffiC Route O Exkting Traffb Signal mono Local Traffic Routs ~ Futon Traffic Signal "• ~ Existing On•-Way Street 0 Exiatktg Stop 8ipn , ~.~ Existing Service ANey ^ Future Stop Sign ~..~ Future Service Aby \\\~ 3trNt P•rtnart•rttly Cloa•d To Whicular Traffic •~~ 8tr••t Closure for Spscisl Events development of new alleyways aze those between Central Avenue and First Street on either side of Campbell Avenue (Diagram 3). These blocks were selected because future public parking structures would otherwise cut off access to the reaz of buildings, making delivery and refuse pick-up difficult. These two alleyways should be developed in conjunction with the adjacent future public pazking facilities. An additional right- of-way a minimum of 12 feet wide should be provided for this purpose. Due to the narrowness of this right-of--way, the new alleyways should be designated for one-way traffic flow. The two existing alleyways shown on Diagram 3 appeaz to be wide enough to accommodate two-way traffic, however. Although the alleys aze intended principally for service use, pedestrian use should be encouraged to the extent that it does not conflict with servicing. It may be appropriate to designate specific hours for refuse collection and delivery to facilitate pedestrian use during non-peak service times. Additionally, the city may want to consider limiting vehiculaz access to service and delivery vehicles only, and/or completely close the alleys to vehiculaz traffic during non-service hours, except where the alley provides sole access to pazking. 17 i I /~ C ---- ~ 0 ~~~:~ -; ,~__ ~. .~ -- _ ' ' ~'~~~ _ ~ ~~ Campbell Downtown Development Plan 0 100 200 700 /f!t ;I i. ~~ i~ --~ it ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~'. tip: ~C f, CIVIC VE I M ~' ~ I lii~. ~ A,~ n v i^~a «~ ^ ^^^ ^ ~ ~ CatCHMt I~ VE ~ - ~-- '` o W ~ --, ~.~„ R j MI M ~~ PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION PLAN Diagram 4 -•-• Pedestrian Zone for Special Events ^ ^ ^ Major Pedestrian Corridor ///// Future Publk: Plaza ^~~^ Existing Pedestrian Connection to Partcing • ~ • Desired Pedestrian Connection to Parking dE Existing Protected Pedestran Gosaing ~C Future Protected Pedestrian Crossing Existing Gosswatii CrosswaNc to be EBrninatsd anm~o Future GosswaNc iiii Future Mid-9bck Crossing In addition to the above crosswalks, a mid block crossing of Campbell Avenue would link the two pedestrian connections to parking facilities located in the blocks between Central Avenue and First Street. Although there would be no signal or stop sign at this location, other factors would make this a safe crossing. These include the relatively low volume and speed of vehicular traffic on Campbell Avenue, its narrow, one-lane configuration and the provision of wide sidewalk bulbs which would limit the roadway width at the crossing to approximately 20 feet. Pedestrian Connections to Parking Facilities To enhance pedestrian connections to existing and future parking facilities, a number of mid-block pedestrian ways to Campbell Avenue should be provided as shown on Diagram 4. Two of these are existing and provide access from privately owned parking areas to Campbell Avenue. Two new pedestrian ways located between Central Avenue and First Street would provide access to future public parking facilities from both sides of Campbell Avenue. They would be linked by amid-block pedestrian street crossing. 19 i~ ,~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ _ ~~~ ~~ ,~ n; ~~ ` ,, / % ~ r ~ - 0~ / '~ °~ C~i ---~ ~ ~~ ~: ~~~ Campbell Downtown ' Development Plan " ;~ -~u ~., ~~I \J; ,~~ n POTENTIAL TRANSIT STATION SITES . _ Diagram 5 changes in the industrial and surrounding residential areas. This site, which is considerably larger than the other two, may offer the potential for joint mixed-use development which could accommodate public transit and parking needs as well as private commercial development 21 PART 4: PARKING PLAN BACKGROUND The downtown pazking supply consists of approximately 520 off-street and 150 on- street pazkingspaceswithinthe azeadefined bythe loop roads. Of these, approximately 100 spaces are reserved for Pazking District lA users. This district serves the Orchazd City Plaza and Water Tower Plaza developments and extends southward beyond the downtown core area, providing an additiona1370 spaces beyond the boundazies of the loop roads. Although this pazking supply at first appeazs adequate based on the current rate of utilization, it appears so only because there is a correspondingly low rate of building space utilization in the downtown. If existing buildings were fully occupied and utilized, a shortage could result. Such a shortage wouldbecome more severe should new development occur. Existing Parking Supply and Utilization The existing parking supply was inventoried and analyzed during Phase 1 of the planning process. The following findings were made as a result of this study. On the whole, both on and off- street pazking in the downtown is presently underutilized, averaging about 50 to 60 percent on weekdays and 50 percent on Friday and Saturday nights. However, individual street segments or off-street lots may experience occu- pancyrates significantly higher or lower than these averages, depending on the location, day and time of use. Despite the overall low rate of utilization, spot shortages may occur from time to time in areas of highest demand. . When taken as a whole, properties within the downtown azea do not meet the city's currently adopted off-street parking standards. Although some of the newer projects may have provided pazking according to these standards, others fall short. This condition is most severe in the area within the loop roads east of Second Street and north of the existing Parking District 1A (Diagram 6). Very little public parking exists to serve this azea and private businesses supply inadequate off-street parking, if any. Coinci- dentallythis is also the azea of greatest demand, both present and future, especially for retail uses. 23 Even with these relaxed standards, the pazking available in the district is currently underutilized. However, it is anticipated that once these projects are fully occupied, the parking supply will be fully utilized and adequate for their needs. In the meantime, the parking available in the district lots and structure is committed to serve only those uses which are included in the district and pay an assessment. Current Parking Requirements A compazative study indicates that Campbell's pazking requirements are considerably more strict than those of other communities in several categories: general offices, retail stores/shopping centers and reseazch/development. These existing strict parking ratios contribute to the current situation where there is a "shortage" of pazking according to code requirements and yet, overall, an underutilization of pazking. In addition to being strict relative to other communities, Campbell's pazking code applies city-wide, to individual projects as well as mixed use developments. Such blanket code require- mentsoften overestimate the need for pazking in downtown and mixed-use azeas where joint utilization of parking commonly occurs. REVISID PARKING RATIOS Revised parking ratios should be implemented for the downtown azea for the following reasons: 1. Existing facilities aze presently underutilized. 2. Existing requirements aze too strict compared to other similar communities. 3. Development is concentrated in the downtown where the potential for shazed parking/joint utilization is high. 4. Development of small pazcels, which comprise most of the downtown area, is difficult to achieve without substantial negative physical results. _. The revised pazking ratios for individual developments and shazed use aze summazized in Tables 1 and 2. For individual developments, the reduction ranges from 33 to 50 percent of current standards (Table 1). Where pazking is provided in shazed facilities, further reductions would be in effect, ranging from 10 to 25 percent of the revised standazds for individual developments (Table 2). These latter reductions would result in an average pazking ratio of one space per 330 squaze feet of gross floor azea when applied to the whole downtown azea. The use of an average ratio for shared parking would be similar in concept to that applied to to those of Pazking District 1A. However, relative to District lA, this new average ratio would result in slightly more pazking for a building with the same floor azea. The intent is to provide adequately for uses such as banks and community facilities which aze not as suitable for shared parking reductions. The ratios in Table 2 indicate the maximum permissible reduction for shazed pazking facilities. This maximum reduction should be automatically granted only where 25 EXPANDING THE PARING SUPPLY The need to expand the downtown parking supply arises from three major sources: 1. Underutilization of the existing parking supply will cease once major projects become fully occupied. 2. As economic/retail activity increases in the downtown the existing parking supply may become inadequate. 3. An adequate parking supply and a mechanism to expand it is necessary to attract new development to the downtown. y To illustrate the magnitude of the problem, if the revised parking ratios were applied to only the existing development within the loop area east of Second Street, a shortfall of approximately 225 parking spaces would result. If an additiona1100,000 gross square feet of new development were to occur in this area, approximately 330 additional new spaces would be required under the revised ratios for shared parking, bringing the total to over 550 new spaces. If some demolition of existing buildings is factored in to make way for this new development, the projected need for additional parking would be approximately 450 spaces for the downtown area east of Second Street alone. Future Public Parking Resources In order to adequately expand the parking supply, five sites are designated for development with new or expanded public parking facilities. These five sites are indicated on Diagram 7 along with the existing public parking facilities in District 1A. The existing and potential parking supply on these five sites is summarized in Table 3. Within the loop area, on Sites 1 through 3, a net increase of 352 spaces could be provided in two structures and one lot. Lots on Sites 4 and 5 could provide over 200 additional spaces outside the loop, for a total net increase of at least 552 parking spaces. This increase would be adequate to serve existing development plus approximately 100,000 - gross square feet of new development. The development of public parking resources on these sites will require extensive site acquisition or leasing as well as a phasing and development strategy. These issues are addressed in Part 7 of this document, Implementation and Funding. The projected costs for acquisition and development are also summarized in that section. PARI~ITG PROVISION AND MANAGEMEN'T' Additional public parking resources should be developed and managed principally to support retail and service commercial users in the downtown. The Land Use Plan, which is presented in the following section, calls for these uses to be concentrated within the loop area east of Second Street. Therefore the public parking resources 27 Table 3 PROJECTED INCREASE IN PARI~ITG SUPPLY WITH DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC PARKING RESOURCES Existing Potential Net Supply Supply Increase Site 1 34 210 176 Site 2 12 40 28 Site 3 62* 210* 148 Site 4 0 185 185 Site 5 60** 80 20 -Total 168* 725* 557 * 62 spaces preserved for Parking District 1A. * * Existing lot is unpaved but is utilized at times by up to 60 vehicles. The parking standards outlined above should take effect immediately upon adoption.. and implementation of this plan by the city. New development and new businesseswill - be required to conform to all provisions immediately upon implementation of the standards. Existing land uses will be required to conform within a specific time frame established by the city, for example, within five years of the establishment of a new downtown parking district. Establishment of a deadline for compliance will require further study and action on the part of the city. In the interim, exemptions to the new parking requirements will be granted only as specified below. In Zone 1, east of Second Street, the following standards shall apply: 1. All new parking shall be provided in shared public facilities. 2. The revised parking ratios for shared parking shall apply, with the maximum reduction for shared use automatically granted. (Table 2). 3. When computing the total parking requirement, credit shall be allowed for existing on-site parking or for existing shared off-site parking if a formal use and maintenance agreement is in effect. 29 for parking development. 3. The revised parking ratios for individual developments (Table 1) automatically apply unless a formal shared parking arrangement is made. 4. Parking requirements may be relaxed for mixed use projects when a formal agree- mentfor shared use is entered into. Reduction may be granted up to the maximum (Table 2) to the extent that documentation is adequate to justify it. 5. Existing uses shall not be required to meet the new parking standards until one of the following occurs: • There is a change in use to one which requires more parking than is currently provided. • An existing use is expanded by 25 percent or more of the existing square footage. • The property occupied in whole or in part by the existing use is improved, resulting in an increase of 25 percent or more in the assessor's fair market value. 31 PART 5: LAND USE PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS BACKGROUND Downtown Campbell includes four principal categories of land use. These are ranked according to their relative prominence and amount of activity as follows: • Offices and Banks • Retail and Service • Restaurant and Entertainment • Community and Cultural Facilities Though found scattered throughout the downtown, offices and banks are more concen- tratedwest ofSecond Street while retailing and services are found east of Second Street, principally along Campbell Avenue. However, on the whole, office uses are stronger and clearly dominate the downtown economy and physical environment. The market analysis for the downtown area indicates a potential for strengthening local- servingretail and restaurants but only in conjunction with additional office or service- orienteddevelopment. The office development is required to provide sufficient support for additional retailing and restaurants. Major retail operations which might draw sufficient business on their own would not be supported in the downtown. Land use and development is currently controlled by the P-D, Planned Development. zoning designation. Under this zoning, any use which is consistent with the General Plan is allowable. In addition, development in the downtown area is subject to the city's site and architectural review process. This process automatically applies in any P-D zoning district. However, at present there are no standards or guidelines which apply specifically to buildings or sites in the downtown. The criteria for site and architectural review are very general and uniform for all areas where applicable throughout the city. 33 Land Use Policies To carry out these goals, specific policies for districts and sites within the downtown area have been developed. Two major land use districts are to be established. District 1 includes the area within the loop roads east of Second Street. This area will be the focus of retail activity, particularly along Campbell Avenue. District 2, west of Second Street, will be oriented more toward office and service commercial uses. However, retail uses are encouraged along Campbell Avenue to the extent feasible. The policies governing development in these two land use districts are further detailed in the following section under Development Standards. In addition to the establishment of downtown land use districts, the Land Use Plan designates certain key sites in and adjacent to the downtown for specific uses. The sites affected are called out on Diagram 10. These sites are to be reserved for future public facilities, particularly parking and transit, as called for in the Circulation and Parking Plans. The policies which apply to these sites are as follows: 1. Adequate sites shall be designated for future public facilities as called for in the Parking Plan. 2. The potential for public use, including parking, shall be maintained on the site north of Civic Center Drive adjacent to the railroad. The potential for mixed use, joint ' I; i ~~ ~ ~' i ;! I ~~ I i',~ ~_~~ rte,. , - ; G ;~ ~. ~~ ~r" ,. r :_:. - .-~ _ _ - .~ -~ )~ /~ i __~ _ ,. _ E. AAOIELL AVENUI ~ I _. r^,~ ~ - -- ~ ~ I ~\~ ORCHARD CITY DRIVE ~~ ~; o o a , --- Campbell Downtown I N ~ yN~ Development Plan I~I ~ O 0 100 200 300 feet ;~, j ® ~ 1 L/ SPECIAL LAND USE REQUIREMENTS Diagram 10 35 J ! ~ - _ r~ • ~ • ~ ~~ ~ • ._7 1._~ • • •- ~ • • °~ .._ _ flt3TE31CJ 2 . Q~ ^ ~• • • ~ _ ~••!•~ L~ Campbell Downtown Development Plan o ioo zno goo E•n ~i J • - ~ •~ ~ i .... E. CAM-E+ELL AVENUE _ ~_TFt.~T 1_ ~ _ _ -- - - ~ RRti ~ • .~ _ s ~ • _. • _ ~i~ ~~ ism ... ~ ~~~ ~• ~• ORCHARD dTt DRIVE ~~ • • •~,y C _ d ~' pc $ ~~ O DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS O~ .• o 4 ~ . ~ , (i ~ - . . Diagram 11 ~ Continuous Retail Frontage Required /Building Setback Not Albwed ~~ Partial Retail Frontap• Required/Buildk~g Setback Not Allowed • • • 10-Foot Setback Requlrad for Buildings and Parking stata>• Opdonai Setback up to 10 Feet Permitted • R~ Building Setback Not Allowed 3. A maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 2.0 shall be allowed throughout downtown to avoid an overwhelming change in scale and intensity of development. Requirements for District 1: The following standards shall apply to all properties in District 1 in addition to the common requirements stated above: 1. Retail and related land uses on the ground floor shall be strongly emphasized for parcels fronting on Campbell Avenue. a) Continuous retail or restaurant frontage shall be required along Campbell Avenue. b) Service commercial uses shall be permitted only along side streets, pedestrian ways, or other locations not fronting directly onto Campbell Avenue, up to a . maximum of 25 percent of the gross ground floor area. 37 Existing buildings which do not conform to the height and/or setback requirements could not be expanded but property owners should not generally be required to alter them to bring them into conformance. When a change in tenancy occurs, however, the standards relating to permitted land uses will apply in all cases. In addition, should substantial compliance with those standards not be achieved within a five year period, the city will consider establishing a mandatory date for compliance. The Development Standazds and the Design Guidelines presented in Part 6 of this document should continue to be administered through the city's site and architectural review process. However, additional measures may be required to implement the Development Standazds. In addition to adoption of the Downtown Development Plan as a policy document, it may be appropriate to change the existing Planned Develop- mentzoning inthe downtown to a new classification which incorporates the provisions of the Land Use Plan and Development Standards. In addition, the plan should be reviewed against the city's General Plan to insure that there are no conflicts between the two. The existing site and azchitectural review process should automatically apply in any new downtown zoning district, just as it does currently in the P-D Zoning District. However, rather than reviewing projects against the general city-wide criteria, the Committee shall review projects for consistency with the specific policies and guide- lines of this plan. The review process, however, would remain the same. The Site and Architectural Review Committee reviews all development plans and makes a recom- mendation to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission, in turn, makes a recommendation to the City Council and the Council make the final decision. In addition to the standazds and guidelines which apply to the downtown azea, the Downtown Development Plan includes recommendations for sites or areas which aze outside the downtown core. The review process would also take such policies into account. Furthermore, additional studies may be required to determine appropriate guidelines for development of these key sites on the downtown periphery, particulazly the industrial azea to the northeast which could meet future circulation, pazking and/ or transit needs for downtown and the city as a whole. 39 Downtown Development Standards Summary Downtown Permitted Land Uses Land Use District Ground Floor Upper Floor DISTRICT 1 Parcels Fronting on Continuous Retail or Retail Campbell Avenue Standard Restaurant Standard Restaurant Fronting on Campbell Service Commercial Avenue. Service Office Commercial Permitted Residential Elsehere up to a Maximum of 25% of Gross Floor Area. Parcels Fronting on Retail Same as Above. North-South Streets Standard Restaurant or Loop Roads Service Commercial Office DISTRICT 2 Parcels Fronting on 2596 of Campbell Retail Campbell Avenue Avenue Frontage Standard Restaurant Required to be Retail Service Commercial or Standard Restaurant Office on Parcels with 100 Residential Feet or More of Frontage. Also Permitted: Service Commercial Office Parcels Fronting on ~~ Same as Above. North-South Streets Standard Restaurant or Loop Roads Service Commercial Office 40 PART 6: URBAN DESIGN INTRODUCTION The Urban Design Plan controls the relationships between elements in the urban environment to foster the creation of spaces which function effectively and aze pleasant places for people. This plan for downtown Campbell includes the following elements: • Design of public improvements such as a plaza, entry statements, and a network of pedestrian pathways, which will help define downtown as an attractive special district. • Designation of specific buildings of architectural significance for preservation and rehabilitation. • Development of guidelines to insure that the azchitecture of new developments will be supportive of apedestrian-oriented retail environment. Background The existing architectural character of downtown reflects the history of the town and many of the changes which have affected it. The oldest and most historically significant structures date back to the time when the fruit drying plants were operating and the azea was a complete service center, where people worked, cashed their pay checks, and made basic purchases. Over the years the properties on Campbell Avenue filled in and the retail core grew west to Second Street. These new retail buildings were more modern in style, reflecting the architecture of the fifties and sixties. The period that followed their development mazked the peak of retail activity. Since that time, the retail mazket has deteriorated due largely to competition from shopping malls. The city has attempted to help the merchants reverse this trend, and improve the visual quality of the azea through the addition of public improvements. Unfortunately these improvements were so poorly supported financially, that they have done little to enhance the azea It is important to note that through this period of retail decline, construction has 43 J -- -- • u~ O ~CIVI~ 1ER DRIVE _ _ - ~ ~. 01 ~ ~ I~i~ ~i~ ~ f //yyam~ Q 'nn'~~ ~1 (mil' ~ ~RRRYROU~r1 _~~ ~o~ ~._ , Campbell Downtown ~~ Development Plan Qo 0 100 I00 700 (R•t ~~i ® ~ I URBAN DESIGN CONCEPT PLAN ~~' ~ ~ ^t - - ~` ~. ~ ..__ ~_~ ~ , ~,~~ _ f 88 tChURD CITT DRIVE ~/ ~~ O^ ~~~ ~ • ~~ L Diagram 12 ,,, t. Campbell Avenue Beautification ~~~ 2. Pubtlc Plaza ~~ 3. Building Continuity "'•••• 4. Landscaped Setback • e e 5. Highway t7 Connection ^ ^ ^ 8. Central Avsnue Beautification Campbell Avenue Beautification ~•••• 7. Pedestrian Ways •~ 8. Alleyways E. Downtown Entrlea ^ O O t0. North/South Street Improvements O O O 1 1. Campbell Avsnue Entry Corridor Campbell Avenue will become the focus of revitalization. Public and private improvements will build on the existing small town character to create an inviting pedestrian-oriented street lined with retail shops. The emphasis will be on an outdoor environment rich in texture and color, where people will stroll, shop and enjoy the environment. To bring this concept to life, a number of public streetscape improvements are called for including the following: 1. Replacement of the existing light standards with small scale, pedestrian-oriented fixtures. 2. Replacement of the existing trash receptacles and benches with new furnishings to enhance the quality of the area. 45 Public Plaza At the east end of Campbell Avenue the existing Ainsley Park shall be expanded and renovated as a public plaza. The current parking area on Harrison Avenue will be added to the park and the whole area will undergo a revitalization with improvements similar to those on Campbell Avenue, including new paving, pedestrian-scale light fixtures, and street furniture. Specific elements of the plaza design should include preservation of the historic walnut trees, the addition of a landmark fountain or artwork, and a platform for staging special events. The plaza should be designed to be a gathering point for community civic events and downtown promotional activities such as arts and craft fairs and 4th of July activities. In addition to these uses it will be an attractive backdrop for the downtown entry and a comfortable place for individuals to stop and enjoy the environment. Diagram 15 illustrates a potential plaza plan. 47 Building Continuity A continuous line of retail businesses shall be required fronting on Campbell Avenue to define the street corridor and add vitality and color to the street environment. This continuity is essential to the success of apedestrian-oriented retail environment as vacant properties and pazking azeas create gaps in the street fabric which discourage customers from window shopping and spending time in the azea. To support this strategy, vacant and underutilized properties are encouraged to intensify, and design guidelines have been prepared to insure that new developments will be supportive of this small scale pedestrian-oriented environment. Specifically, merchants and property owners aze encouraged to make special efforts to create colorful and interesting statements along the Campbell Avenue facades. Colorful signs, awnings and banners projecting into the pedestrian's view would add depth and interest to storefronts and facades and catch the pedestrian's eye. Special provisions have been added into the guidelines to allow merchants greater freedom in using these devices. In addition, shop owners are encouraged to provide attractive displays, window boxes, planters, and coordinated color schemes for their buildings. All these elements combined with regular high quality maintenance will help improve the visual quality of the Campbell Avenue corridor. Landscaped Setback In contrast with Campbell Avenue, whichwill be apedestrian-oriented street lined with shops, the loop roads will primarily serve vehicular traffic and will be bordered with parking azeas. To soften the edges of the rear building facades and parking areas a mandatory ten-foot landscaped setback shall be required. (Refer to Part 5: Land Use Plan and Development Standards.) This setback shall apply to all public and private properties bordering on the loop roads. The landscaping and maintenance of these setbacks shall be the responsibility of the adjacent developments. Tree planting is encouraged, especially adjacent to the parking garages where height will help screen the structures. Diagram 16 illustrates the scale of the setback. Highway 17 Connection One of the primary goals of the Downtown Development Plan is to clarify the access from Highway 17 to downtown. As described in the Circulation Plan, several alternatives for accomplishing this were analyzed and determined to be appropriate long range alternatives. As an interim measure, the existing Salmar/Harrison route shall be upgraded with new curbs, gutters and sidewalks. In addition, new signing directing vehicles from the Highway 17 off-ramp to downtown shall be installed, with colorful banners attached to existing light standards to help define the route. New street trees shall also be planted to improve the visual quality of the streets. Diagram 17 illustrates all of these improvements to the Harrison/Salmaz Avenue corridor. 49 Central Avenue Central Avenue is an important pedestrian link as it connects downtown to the Civic Center and Water Tower Plaza developments. To highlight this pedestrian emphasis the street shall be improved with pedestrian scale amenities similar to those described for Campbell Avenue. These should include new light fixtures, special sidewalk paving, new street trees and planters where space is available. In addition, traffic signals will be installed at the intersections with the loop roads to ease the pedestrian crossing. These improvements are designed to invite people to leave their cars and walk downtown, and to make downtown feel a part of a larger destination area. Diagram 18 shows a section through the improved Central Avenue. (~lVTRAL AVENUE -SECTION Diagram 18 51 PARKING AREA PIDESTRIAN WAY -PLAN Diagram 20 53 North-South Street Improvements Modest landscape improvements shall be made on the north-south streets within the loop to improve their visual qualities and unify the area. These improvements include maintenance to sidewalks, curbs and gutters, and new street trees to add color, texture, and define the edge of the streets. Campbell Avenue Corridor Improvements along Campbell Avenue, outside the loop between Winchester Boule- vard and the freeway, shall be installed to create an attractive entry corridor. These improvements include new landscaping and maintenance of public improvements. Over time it is hoped that the properties along this route will develop with uses which will reinforce downtown's role as a retail center. PUBLIC Il1~ROVEII~NT STANDARDS Many improvements such as landscaping, pedestrian-scale light fixtures, decorative paving and street furniture will be repeated throughout downtown. The following descriptions and photographs have been developed to help the city select actual furnishings for the revitalization. Diagram 22 identifies these elements and illustrates their use along Campbell Avenue. Lighting Traditional cast iron light fixtures repeated throughout downtown will create a strong visual image which will give the area a special night character, emphasize the historic buildings, and unify downtown. However careful selection of the fixtures is necessary to insure that the new lamps will be compatible not only with the historic structures but with the wider range of architectural styles currently located within the loop. Therefore, while a traditional style is recommended, the city should limit its selections to those which are simpler in form; heavy elaborate styles would be inappropriate to the scale and character of the area. First priority for placing the lights should be on Campbell Avenue, Central Avenue, and in the Plaza. Special lighting would also be appropriate at downtown entries and at the edge of public surface parking lots. A wall fixture of similar design would be an attractive and useful addition to the pedestrian ways and parking garages facing onto the alleys. Landscape Landscaping and trees add softness, shade, texture and color to contrast the harsh lines and colors of urban environments. As such they make the environment more human and comfortable. In addition, regular planting of trees adds a rhythm and unity which can tie an area full of diverse elements into an integrated whole. Trees and planters are recommended in almost every component of the Urban Design Concept Plan. The following guidelines should be kept in mind when the landscape plan is developed: 55 • A sturdy tree with shading potential which requires limited maintenance should be selected for street planting. These trees should be planted at uniform intervals except at extensions into the pazking lane on Campbell Avenue where trees should be clustered. All trees should be protected with tree grates. • The plaza and entry azeas offer opportunities for plantings of special accent trees that add color and reflect the change of seasons. • Parking areas shall be planted with low maintenance trees which provide shade and softness to break up the expanse of paving. Trees which drip sap or drop fruit should be avoided. • Raised wall type planters shall be provided at extensions into the pazking lane on Campbell Avenue as they sepazate the pedestrian from traffic and will make these areas more sheltered and comfortable. • Planters shall be large enough in size to allow automatic irrigation as this will simplify maintenance. • All planters shall be attractively planted; those at mid-block areas, downtown entries and the public plaza should provide areas for accent colors. Paving Special paving shall be installed to strengthen the pedestrian scale and improve the definition of the boundazies and entries to downtown. Possible materials include brick, interlocking pavers, or the cobbles. All of these are unitary which means they are small units which fit together to cover the area and add a sense of scale. The overall color of the paving should be a subtle earth tone that unifies the entire azea and contrasts with the asphalt in the streets and parking areas. Decorative paving should be installed on Campbell and Central Avenue sidewalks and in the plaza. It would also be appropriate in the pedestrian ways which connect Campbell Avenue to the pazking azeas. Street Furniture Benches, trash receptacles, bollazds, newspaper racks, public telephones and bicycle racks all constitute the furniture of the street. These elements add scale and chazacter and invite people to stop and enjoy the space rather than just pass through. The furniture shall be cazefully selected to complement historic buildings in the azea and also to be compatible with the newer building additions. Traditional materials such as cast iron and wood are appropriate, but designs should be simple. Deliberate attempts to look "old time" or "high tech" are discouraged. The organization and placement of furniture should also be carefully considered to maximize the useability of the furnishings. The extensions in the sidewalk along Campbell Avenue offer opportunities for people to gather and should be supplied with benches and trash containers, as should the public plaza. 57 BUII.DING CONSERVATION Historically, Campbell's downtown was the focal point of the community and its agricultural industry. Many buildings from that period can still be found in the study area. The City's Historic Preservation Task Force surveyed these buildings and presented a list of historic buildings to the City Council which the Council approved in March of 1984. This Historic Resources Inventory lists the potentially historic buildings in and around the downtown area. Of some 60 buildings identified, 16 are located in the downtown area between the loop roads. The Task Force has prioritized historic buildings within the downtown area in order of their relative significance. These priority rankings are indicated on Diagram 23. The highest ranked property is a complex of buildings which housed the Campbell Fruit Growers Union. It lies south of the downtown loop area and has been recently rehabilitated into an office/retail complex, Water Tower Plaza. The remaining build- ings, all within the loop, have been numbered according to the Task Force's priority ranking. A few of these have been renovated or simply maintained in good condition over the years and retain their original architectural features. Others are in poor repair or have been altered significantly in appearance from the original clesign. J ~ - - ~S f _ U ~D ~- ~- _ ~o ^ c_ ^=o~~ L_`- = ~__ Campbell Downtown Development Plan 0 700 200 300 leer ~, ~ ~~ O ~CIVI~ TER DRIVE _ ~ t_rJ `. _ E. C~MPBELI AVENUE _l~ ~ ~ ~ -~ - -- ._. 0 0~ ~ B o ~ , ~ .,. ORCHARD CITY DRIVE _ _ ~~ .~~ \ Z_ ~ ~; ~,` N o^ ~ ~. C z - O "i `~ ,," BUILDING CONSERVATION Diagram 23 Buildings Within the Loop Area are Numbered in Sequence According to the Priority for Preservation as Determined by the Historic Preservation Task Force. 59 BUILDING GUIDELINES The intent of these guidelines is to stimulate high quality architecture which is appropriate in Campbell's small business district. They are prepared both for use as references by property owners and their architects when planning projects and as guidance to the city when evaluating proposals. The guidelines are presented as basic principles designed to insure that future developments will be of high quality and compatible in character. They shall apply to all properties located within the downtown loop system. Building Massing 1. Large building facades shall be divided into smaller elements twenty to thirty feet in width, to complement the intimate scale created by the existing small property divisions. 2. Second floor decks or terraces at the rear of buildings for use by adjacent offices or restaurants are encouraged to add a sense of vitality to the rear building facades. 3. Flat roofs with parapets are preferred. While other roof forms may be considered appropriate, mansard, shed, undulating, or residential type roofs are discouraged... 4. The existing residential building types of historic significance should retain their character, including features such as landscaped setbacks. 61 SECOND FLOOR DECKS AT THE REAR OF BUILDINGS Building Form and Composition 1. Unique and historic building elements such as parapet details and belt courses shall be retained and restored. 2. Traditional commercial building forms such as transom windows, storefronts and parapets are encouraged. 3. Open air dining areas facing Campbell Avenue are encouraged. The buildings should not be set back from the street but should contain the dining areas within their architectural framework. 4. The height of building facade elements such as belt courses and window and door heights shall relate to adjacent buildings. 5. Upper stories in multi-story buildings are required to have solid surfaces with vertical, rectangular windows, set in frames. Glass curtain walls should be avoided. 6. Simple, timeless design is encouraged. Attempts to make buildings look distinctly "old time" or "modern" are discouraged. 7. Buildings shall incorporate distinct base and cornice elements. ~-AWNINGS • ~ ^2ND FLOOR WINDOWS BELT COURSE -CORNICE rWINDOW SOXES -OVERHANG r / ^EXTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGNS ~~ i - ~_ ai_;HOF J ~~ JOHN'S JUICE BAR _ vIpEU E+~D i ' _ : -~ ~ i, -PILASTER I. `AWNING TRANSOM WINDOWS i-TILE BASE `WALL SIGN ~~ RECESSED ENTRY DIRECTORY OF BUILDING PARTS 63 Storefronts 1. First floor frontages shall have an integrated design including display windows, an entry and signing. 2. The building storefront shall be framed within a base, side columns or walls and a cornice, overhang, or belt course. 3. Walls facing pedestrian ways are encouraged to have elements of visual interest, such as fenestration, displays, signing or landscaping. Large areas of blank walls are discouraged. 4. Buildings facing Campbell Avenue shall have their primary entries along that street. 5. Recessed entries are encouraged as they add depth to the storefront and act as transition areas between the street and shop interiors. 6. Doors and windows shall be of clear glass. Wood doors, screen doors and doors or windows of heavily tinted or reflective glass are discouraged. 7. Storefront windows shall reflect the building's character. For instance, on 1940's and 50's "showcase" buildings exposed aluminum frame windows are appropriate; all other building types should have darkly painted or anodized window frames. 8. Ground floor offices facing Campbell Avenue are required to maintain the same storefront character as retail spaces, but may have low walls on the exterior or interior modifications. 9. The use of awnings on building facades is encouraged, as they add color, weather protection and opportunities for signing. As in other architectural elements, the awnings should be designed to reflect the building's geometry. For instance, the most appropriate awnings for 1940's and '50s "showcase" buildings with integral overhangs would be straight, hanging awnings. Materials, Colors and Finishes 1. Primary facade materials shall be limited to brick or stucco to unify the visual quality of the district and reflect the traditional building materials used in the area. 2. Exterior wall finishes shall be smooth and of finished quality, not deliberately rough in an attempt to look antiqued or used. 3. Primary building colors shall be light neutral tones such as white, blue-gray or beige to act as a background for accent trim, awnings, and signing. 65 SIGN GUIDELINES The intent of these guidelines is to stimulate creative, good quality signing which will complement the intimate scale and architectural character of the area. Background Unlike many commercial areas, downtown does not have a wealth of oversized, ugly signs. However, many of the businesses have failed to take full advantage of the opportunities that signing offers to identify the services or merchandise they provide. Many downtown businesses have small signs, which are difficult to read from across the street or from a moving vehicle, and some shops have no sign at all. In fact, the whole area could be greatly enlivened, and more easily identified as a retail center, if the merchants became more ambitious and creative in their signing. Summary and Intent The existing City of Campbell Sign Ordinance requirements and restrictions shall apply with the following exceptions: • The allowed projections and clearances for awnings and projecting signs should be modified along Campbell Avenue to allow merchants greater freedom. • Internally illuminated signs shall be prohibited. All signs are required to be designed by a professional graphic designer. 67 WALL SIGN AWNING SIGN 69 71 PROJECTING SIGN 13ANNr;K 51(iN DISPLAY 73 PART 7: IMPLEMENTATION AND FUNDING THE Il~LEMENTATION STRATEGY The implementation and funding actions required for the successful revitalization of downtown Campbell are outlined in this part. Major strategy components are outlined, public and private responsibilities are described, and implementation and funding schedules aze provided. Establishing a .Successful Revitalization Climate Many declining downtown business districts have been revitalized largely without governmental assistance. Quite often these private efforts have been boosted by a strong, expansive local economy. In some cases they have found themselves strategically located in the path of burgeoning suburban development. In other cases businesses have been prodded into action by an aggressive downtown association or the threat of a competing shopping center. In downtown Campbell several conditions tend to mitigate against a totally private, self- revitalization approach. These conditions include: • The presence of relatively small parcels, sub-standazd buildings, fragmented ownerships and, in some cases, marginal businesses. • Street frontages with inadequate retail continuity. • A downtown that is insufficiently attractive to intercept potential customers passing by on adjoining streets. • A potentially inadequate supply of parking. • An investment climate that deters property owners and businesses from making expenditures for rehabilitation, expansion, or new construction. 75 All implementation and funding schedules contained in this development plan have been prepazed in accordance with this phasing schedule. Public Actions A wide range of public actions will be required for the successful implementation of the downtown development plan: • Streetscape and Urban Design Improvements The plan provides for more than $1.4 million in public streetscape and urban design improvements. These improvements aze described in more detail in Part 6 of this plan. • Circulation Improvements A number of circulation improvements will be needed to implement the plan. These improvements aze described in Part 3 of this plan. • Public Parking A total of five new or expanded public parking facilities aze scheduled for development in the Downtown Development plan. The total cost of these facilities (to be funded by a combination of in lieu pazking fees, assessment districts, and tax allocation bond funds) could exceed $8.5 million. The parking program is described in Part 4 of this plan. Projected parking facility costs aze summarized in Table 5. • Property Acquisition, Relocation, and Site Clearance The successful implementation of the plan will require the acquisition of a number of private properties to eliminate blighted buildings, assemble land for new and expanded public parking facilities, and assemble sites for private development. Property acquisition is summazized in Diagram 24. The relocation of businesses and residents, property management of acquired properties, and site cleazance will be necessary also.- • Developer Assistance It is anticipated that assistance to private developers (both owner participants and., new developers) will need to be provided to implement the plan. Typical assistance could include land writedown (i.e. the disposition of land by the agency at less than acquisition cost) and the assembly of land by the agency (including the use of eminent domain, if necessary) for private development. Although the city will need to fund these activities during early years of project revitalization, it should be possible to recapture a substantial portion of these costs 77 • Administration of Development Standards and Guidelines Part 5 of this plan sets forth land uses, standards, and guidelines for public and private development under the plan. The successful implementation of the plan will require effective administration by the city and the agency of these standards and guidelines. • General Plan and Zoning Changes Some general plan and zoning changes may be required to conform to the requirements of this plan. These changes should be implemented in the eazly stages of plan implementation. • Parking Management Program As the Downtown Development Plan is implemented, pressures on available parking resources maybe expected to increase. Although the development of new and expanded pazking facilities may grant some relief, a pazking management program should be implemented also. Although the details of the program have not been defined, it could include, as pazking demand increases: 1. Designation of less central azeas for employee pazking. 2. Adjustment of time zones. 3. Parking meters. 4. Pazking permits. 5. Introduction of pazking validation systems. 6. Pazking lot monitors. 7. Increased parking regulation enforcement. • Enactment of Funding Measures As may be appropriate, both city and agency will need to make timely approvals of budgets, appropriations, and bond issues to fund public improve-ments and related implementation costs. Such approvals also will include the sponsorship of special assessment districts andlor enactment of legislation authorizing the collection of in- lieu pazking fees. • Project Administration Effective implementation of the plan will require added full-time staff and substantial support from other city departments. Two fulltime positions are recommended: an Assistant Executive Director and an Acquisition/Relocation/Rehabilitation Coordinator. 79 construction of new buildings, the organization of an effective downtown business association, and the sponsorship of downtown marketing and promotion efforts. Two major approaches will be utilized to ensure active private participation in the financing of parking and streetscape improvements: • Formation of A Special Downtown Assessment District The formation of a special downtown assessment district is recommended eazly in phase one as a means of ensuring private participation in the revitalization of downtown Campbell. During phase one the assessment district should be expected to assume full responsibility for funding all streetscape maintenance activities and partial responsibility for funding pazking and streetscape improvements. In subsequent revitalization phases the district should be prepared to take an increasingly stronger role in funding these activities. The long-term objective is an assessment district that has the capability of assuming full responsibility for the financing and maintenance of all downtown pazking and streetscape improvements not otherwise provided for under other assessment districts (such as the Water Tower Plaza/Orchazd City Plaza assessment district). The type of assessment district (such as 1911-1915 Act, AB 1693, or Mello-Roos), the area to be included, and the level of assessments will all be defined in the future. • In-Lieu Parking Fee Program An in-lieu pazking fee program should be implemented early in phase one to ensure an adequate supply of public pazking in the downtown azea. The program should apply to all properties within the downtown plan area. A property owner within the area desiring to improve his or her property in a substantial way (for example, an increase in assessor's fair market value of 25 percent or more) would be required to satisfy the parking requirement specified elsewhere in the development plan by either: (1) providing required parking spaces on-site or, (2) paying an in-lieu parking fee. Normally the amount ofthe in-lieu parking fee would be determined by multiplying the cost of providing a space in the public parking facility (open parking lot or gazage, whatever is appropriate at the time of application) by the number of on-site spaces for which relief is sought. However, the payment could be based also upon a reasonable percentage of that total cost. In-lieu fees provide a fair and equitable method for shazing the cost of new pazking. It is expected that in-lieu pazking fees will pay for a significant part of the total cost of providing downtown pazking lots and structures. Other private actions include: 81 2. Recommendations for the design and location of signage to facilitate access to downtown. 3. Recommendations on increasing the number of special events (street fairs, historic pageants, art shows, sidewalk sales, and grand openings, for example). 4. Outreach programs to attract desirable businesses to downtown, including the provision of special incentives for such businesses. It is expected that these activities will be funded privately by the downtown business association. Il1~LEMEN'rATION ACTIONS AND PHASING The successful implementation of the Downtown Development Plan will require a whole series of public and private actions. Major implementation actions are summarized by phase below and in Diagrams 26, 27, and 28. Amore detailed description can be found in Table 6, Master Implementation Schedule. Phase One: Short-Term City/Redevelopment Agency Responsibilities • City loans redevelopment agency money for plan implementation. • Redevelopment agency sponsors tax allocation bond issue. • City or agency constructs streetscape and circulation improvements. • City or agency assembles entire block bounded by Civic Center Drive, Central Avenue, East Campbell Avenue, and First Street; museum is relocated into new building in a Civic Center location; residents and businesses on site are relocated and site is cleared; a parking lot is constructed on northerly portion of the site (Site 1); and southerly portion of the site is sold to a private developer for a major project. • City or agency assembles property for parking lots on Sites 2 and 3; a parking lot is constructed on Site 2; and the S_ ite 3 area is held for future parking lot expansion. • Agency purchases and constructs Site 4 parking lot. • City implements in-lieu parking fee program, collects fees, and sponsors downtown special assessment district. 83 Private Responsibilities • To the extent legally permitted, the existing (Water Tower Plaza/Orchazd City Plaza) parking district assumes responsibility for reimbursing the city for the cost of acquisition and construction of the expanded parking lot on Site 3, as well as for ongoing maintenance. • The special downtown assessment district assumes a higher level of responsibility for the financing and maintenance of pazking and streetscape improvements. J . ~~ =~ __ ~ LI Cr-U ~ u~wu ;~~ -ENT" oR:i~ n u I~••....._„4,,~ - .__ _ _ _ __ f. CAMVlELL AVENUE _ _ _ _ __ J ~ ~~ ~ '~' - '~~ -~ Campbell Downtown L Development Plan 0 100 100 100 leer o .~ ~ r - s Nwu s' - ~ c ~ ~~ C Parking ' Lot Expanded O ` ~• Cky%Agency Acquires (Sits 3) ~~ and Constructs ~ 4 Employee Parking Lot !' ° -(Site 5) PHASE TWO: MID-TERM IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Diagram 27 Phase Three: Long-Term City/Redevelopment Agency Responsibilities • Redevelopment Agency sponsors a second tax allocation bond issue. • To the extent that accumulated special assessments or in-lieu parking fees permit, city constructs parking structures on Sites 1 and 3 parking lots. Private Responsibilities • Previously identified streetscape and parking facility financing and maintenance . obligations continue. 85 Ongoing Annual Costs Ongoing annual costs include: • Project Administration Estimated annual cost: $191,000. • Streetscape and Parking Facility Maintenance Estimates are currently unavailable. As mentioned before, a special downtown assessment district should be formed to assume full responsibility for these costs. • Downtown Marketing/Promotion Program Estimates are currently unavailable. These costs should be paid by the downtown business association. • Tax Allocation Bond Amortization Tax allocation bonds issued by the Agency will need to be amortized on an annual basis. For the purposes of'the demonstration funding program contained in this report, two Tax Allocation Bond Issues have been assumed: • An issue of approximately $4.6 million in Fiscal Yeaz 1988-89. • A second issue of approximately $10.6 million in Fiscal Yeaz 1995-96. These issues are illustrative only. The timing and size of actual bond issues will be determined at a later date. Il1~LEMENTATION AND FUNDING SCF~DULES Three schedules have been prepared to summazize the major implementation and funding activities necessary to carry out the project: Master Implementation Schedule. Presented as Table 6, this schedule places all major implementation activities into sequence. • Total Projected Funding Requirements. In addition to public improvements, funding needs to be provided for property acquisition, museum relocation, rehabilitation facade improvement loan program, developer assistance, and project administration. Table 7 provides a comprehensive summary of these requirements. 87 • Demonstration Funding Program. Major sources of project funding include tax increments (direct revenues and tax allocation bonds), direct reimbursement of costs by developers and the existing parking assessment district., city loans to the redevelopment agency, in lieu parking fees, and block grants. Table 8 matches funding needs with potential funding sources. The program demonstrates that the chances of successful funding are very good. These schedules are illustrative in nature and are designed to demonstrate project feasibility. The schedules and the cost estimates that support tfiem aze preliminary in nature and will be subject to change as implementation progresses and changes aze made in the program. Nevertheless, both schedules and costs aze sufficiently accurate to permit informed decisionmaking. 89 Table s City Responsibilities Construction of Public Improvements Developer Assistance/ Rehabilitation Private Responsiblities Downtown Organizational Mazketing Prepaze for street beautification/ street improvements (CampbelU Central/North-South Streets and Plaza) including demolition and removal (City) Undergrounding of utilities (City/ PG and E) Construct street beautification/ improvements (CampbelLCentraU North-South Streets and Plaza) (City) Following assembly of property, construct Sites 1, 2 and 4 parking lots (City) Install new traffic signals oa Central Avenue and, as appropri- ate, stop signs and crosswalks Construct "Highway 17 Connection" street beautification and improve- ments (City) Construct "Downtown Entries" Expand and reconstruct Site 3 surface parking lot (City) Build surface Parking lot on Site 5 (City) Formulate and approve developer assistance and reha- bilitation/ facade improvement loan program (Agency/City) Continue developer assistance/rehabili- tation loan program (Agency/City) Organize special assessment district for parking and streetscape construction and maintenance Organize Downtown Business Association (DBA) DBA prepazes and implements Down- town Marketing Program, including marketing brochure and advertising DBA endorses Down- town Development Plan, in-lieu parking fee pmgram and developer assistance andrehabilitation/ facade improvement loan program Special assessment district assumes increasingly responsible role for parking and streetscape construction and maintenance Continue marketing program (DBA) Extend Campbell Avenue beautification beyond the loop Continue developer assistance/rehabili- tation loan program (Agency/City) Special assessment district continues streetscape and parking responsibilities Continue marketing program (DBA) 91 Table 7 Footnotes: (1) Assumes that all streetscape and urban design improvements will be completed in Phase One. Includes Highway 17 connection. (2) Special identification at major points of entry, including signage, lighting, and landscaping. (3) Land assembly, including related relocation and demolition expenses, for pazking lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 and private development site. (4) Relocation of city museum necessary to develop pazking lot 1. (5) Construction of pazking lots 1, 2, and 4. (6) Circulation improvements (complete, includes Highway 17 connection). (7) Allocation for net loss. (8) Five years at $191,000 per year. (9) Interest payments on first (1988-89) bond issue. (10) Assumes 2.5 years' contingency at 4% (10%). Bond interest excluded. (11) Relocation and demolition for expansion of parking lot 3. Land assembly for parking lot 5. (12) Construction parking lots 3 and 5. (13) Interest payments on first (1988-89) and second (1995-96) bond issues combined. (14) Assumes 7.5 years' contingency at 4% (30%). Bond interest excluded. (15) Construction of parking decks on parking lots 1 and 3. (16) Assumes city loans of $3,268 plus 10 years' simple interest at 9%. (17) Assumes 12.5 yeazs' contingency at 4% (50%). Bond interest and city loans excluded. Note: All sources John B. Dykstra Sc Associates unless otherwise indicated. For further detail on costs and assumptions, reference should be made to the Supplemental Cost and Financial Tables, May 1988, available at the offices of the Campbell Redevelopment Agency. 93 Table 8 footnotes: (1) Net proceeds, assumed 1988-89 tax allocation bond issue. (2) Assumes-land cost write-down of 50%. (3) Assumes recovery of 50% of the acquisition costs of pazking lot 3 expansion from Water Tower Plaza/Orchazd City Plaza Assessment District. (4) Source: City of Campbell. (5) City loan to Redevelopment Agency. Subject to future reimbursement. (6) Part of net proceeds, assumed 1995-96 tax allocation bond issue. (7) Assumes recovery of 50% of pazking lot 3 expansion construction costs from Water Tower Plaza/Orchazd City Plaza Assessment District. (8) Remaining net proceeds, assumed 1995-96 tax allocation bond issue. - (9) Assumes recovery of 100% of cost of building pazking gazage on pazking lot 3 from Water Tower Plaza/C+rchazd City Plaza Assessment District. Note: All sources John B. Dykstra & Associates unless otherwise indicated. For further detail on costs and assumptions, reference should be made to the Supplemental Cost and Financial Tables, May 1988, available at the offices of the Campbell Redevelopment Agency. 95