Loading...
Remodel Historic Home - 2005I, Craig Henry, owner of 189 South Third Street, Campbell, Ca, agree to completion of work as follows: 1. Installation of front yard privacy fence by April 1, 2007; and, 2. Installation of all landscaping and rear fencing by April 23, 2007. I understand that non-compliance with these deadlines will result in referral to code compliance, and that I will be responsible for payment of staff fees if this results. Craig Henry OF ' CgMn~ ;~• ~ V r' .. a y ti f L •~RCH A~~• CITY of CAMPBELL Community Development Department March 2, 2006 Building and Design Solutions Luis Morgan 5895 Camden Avenue San Jose, CA 95124 Re: Building Permit No: BLD2006-123 189 S. Third Street Dear Applicant: The Planning Division has reviewed your building plan permit submittal for the remodel and second story addition to an existing, historic single-family residence located at the above referenced address. Per the Historic Preservation Board review of November 14, 2005, and zoning code review, please review the following notes and address the action items prior to issuance of a building permit: Notes: 1. The dormers have been revised as discussed with the Historic Preservation Board, and are acceptable as proposed. Action Items: 2. New One-car Garage: The plans include a new one-car garage. This proposed change was reviewed by the Historic Preservation Board. Please change the roof form to a gable. Also, the maximum height of the garage at the west side is 10 feet to allow the five foot setback. Please note the height of the garage on Sheet A7. 3. Sheet A.4, Site Plan: a. New landscaping is shown. Please eliminate the rock garden, and provide a historically appropriate landscape alternative in this front yard area. Please add the plant list to this sheet (attached submitted list). b. Show the Hollywood driveway (two concrete strips with a vegetative strip down the center). c. Specify the height of the deck. If greater than 12 inches above finish grade, the deck must meet setbacks. Specify the finish of the deck. d. Show side yard fencing if proposed. 70 North First Street Campbell, California 9 5008-1 4 3 6 ~ Tee 408.866.2140 ~ Fnx 408.866.8381 ~ Too 408.866.2790 BLD2006-123 - 189 South Third Street Page 2 of 2 4. Sheet A.7. Elevations: a. Specify exterior paint colors for body and trim. At the Historic Preservation Board meeting, paint was specified for both the body and the trim. Specify the finish of the wood fence and decking as painted, whitewashed, or equivalent to compliment the house. b. Specify the frame color of the aluminum windows. c. Specify the color of the sliding gate at the rear driveway off of the alley. d. The property owner's letter to the Historic Preservation Board (attached) states the project shall include the following attributes: new composition roof in shingle style, green in color; white body color and white trim color with green shutters; colonial-style, raised panel, front door painted white; lantern-style front porch light. Please reflect these items on the plans. 5. Location of Roof Vents: Please show the location of all roof vents, and make an effort to group them off of the front elevation. 6. Trees: The size, species and drip line all existing trees on site should be indicated on the site plan. Additionally, please return the enclosed tree disclosure statement indicating whether any protected trees are proposed to be removed with the addition. Protected trees include Redwood, Cedar, Oak, or Ash trees with a diameter of more than 12 inches, measured four-feet above grade. 7. Property Ownership: Metroscan continues to show Kenneth and Doreen Williams Trustee as the owners. Does the signature on the building application reflect authorization by the current owner? Thank you for the opportunity to review these plans. Please submit your revised drawings to the Building Division. If you have any questions regarding the comments contained in this letter, please feel free to contact me at (408) 866-2124 or by email at jackieL(c~ci , ofcampbell.com. Sincerely, Jackie C. Young Lind, AICP Senior Planner cc: Building Critchfield Construction, Ricky Critchfield, 845 S. McGlincy Lane, Campbell, CA 95008 Craig Henry, CHenry7033@aol.com RE~E~~F~ ~f~ 1 4 ?005 C~NIN~ pP~flC December 14, 2005 This notification allows CraigHenry to act as trustee for all matters pertaining to construction and remodel of 189 So. 3`d St., Campbell, Ca. 95008 ~~ •~~ Date: 12.12.2005 Time: 1010 EST Attn: Jackie Lind Subject: Landscape Plan for 189 S. Third St. Jackie, Here is the landscape plan you requested last week. If you need any additional information email at chenry7033 ,aol.com. I look forward to meeting you. Sincerely, Craig Henry CONCRETE W Z o ~ .o~ :~~ $' ,~'_,o• S O p Y ~ W •L'~' O fA i ).9:6 b .S :6 O 15-3' (~) ~ '. (~ed0) .I L .9 .. ~ nd. c ~ o .t g io Z ~ ~ (A Z g 4 ~ ~m 49'-0" P.L .«:9i Z g ~.(u~0).7~u66: w....ai-: Td ROCK GARDEN ~-- - Z g BRICK PAVERS 4 J a 9 h R v W H W U Z O U .rr r ITEM NO. 3 ~~.oF • caMAe~ v r CITY OF CAMPBELL • HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD 0 0 s~ `; Staff Report • Meeting of November 14, 2005 •~RCHAa~• PRE2005-180 Application of Mr. Craig Henry and Ms. Joann Ogee for Kenneth and Doreen Henry, Craig Williams, Trustee for construction of a major remodel to a historic home located at 189 South Third Street in the R-1-6, Single-family Residential Zoning District /Historic Overlay District. BACKGROUND According to the Community Development Administrative Procedure on the Referral of Projects and Plans to the Historic Preservation Board, both development and pre-development applications for properties listed on the City's Historic Resources Inventory are referred for review and comments by the Historic Preservation Board. At the pre-application phase, the Board may direct staff to inform the applicant of the concerns and/or issues raised during the review. PROJECT SITE The subject property is located at 189 South Third Street (reference Attachment 1, Location Map). The property is developed with a historic home which fronts on South Third Street. An existing alley runs along the north side property line. The existing home is a one-story wood frame home with a brown shake roof (reference Attachment 2, Photos), and is described on the attached Historic Resources Inventory Sheet as an example of a Colonial Revival Cottage, circa 1940 (reference Attachment 3, Inventory Sheet). Exterior siding is wood v-groove painted white, with wood trim painted brown. The existing home is 830 square feet, with a 35 square foot front porch. The lot size is 3,750 square feet. Also on the property is an existing, 216 square foot one-story shed located at the rear of the property. The shed design and finishes match the home. No on-site parking is provided. PROPOSAL The proposal includes the construction of a major remodel to the home (reference Attachment 4, Project Plans), to result in a 1,420 square foot, two bedroom home with a 113 square foot porch, including: • A first floor, 197 square foot addition at the rear of the home; • A second floor, 394 square foot addition at the rear of the home; • Relocation and reconstruction of the front porch to the southeast corner of the front elevation; and, • Retention of the existing shed. Historic Preservation Board staff Report PRE2005-180 -189 South Third Street Page 2 of 3 STAFF ANALYSIS The property is located in R-1-6 zoning district, with a Historic ("H") Overlay District designation. An analysis of compliance with the development standards applicable to this zoning district is included as Attachment 5. As noted in this chart, the "H" Overlay District findings allow for the proposed front porch setback, the second story north side yard setback, and the setback between the home and the shed. Planning Commission approval would be required for an increased floor area ratio (up to .50), and a parking exception to waive the on-site parking requirement. The standard lot size on the R-1-6 zoning district is 6,000 square feet. The subject property lot is 3,675 square feet in area. Given that the lot is only 61 % of the standard lot size for zoning district, and that the proposed lot coverage and floor area ratio are within the range approval without further exception, staff is supportive of the project as it accommodates a modest level of modern-day living while preserving and enhancing the historic integrity of this period home. The applicant proposes the following attributes and specifications (reference Attachment 6, Applicant's letter) to preserve and enhance the historic the integrity of this Colonial Revival home: • Maintain the historic relationship of the relocated front porch to the street; • Maintain the continuous vertical mass with the second story addition, while minimizing the increase in the structure height by constructing of the second story tucked under and at the rear; • Maintain the traditional, detached spacial relationship between the home and the shed; • Any new exterior siding to match the existing wood v-groove siding; • Inclusion of two, small dormers; • Relocated and reconstructed front porch to match existing porch; • New, custom divided lite windows (to replace the 1960's replacement windows) in a 6 over 1 pattern; • New composition roof in shingle style, green in color; • Shutters on front elevation windows; • Exteriors colors to be white with white trim and green shutters; and, • Complement the front elevation with aColonial-style, raised panel, front door painted white; and alantern-style front porch light. Historic Preservation Board Staff Report PRE2005-180 -189 South Third Street Page 3 of 3 Staff recommends the following changes and augmentations to the project to increase the conformity of the project with current development standards, while maintaining a high degree of historic integrity: • Convert the shed to a one-car garage with access from the alley, and add a Hollywood style driveway. This would provide for on-site parking, maintain the traditional access from the alley, minimize the amount of impervious paving for a new driveway, and preserve the architectural integrity of the front elevation and front yard configuration. • Submit a historically complimentary Landscape Plan for the front yard. Include plantings and all property fencing. This application is preliminary and no formal application has yet been filed. The increased floor ratio requires approval of the Planning Commission. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Historic Preservation Board: 1. Recommend approval of the increased floor ratio; and, 2. Recommend approval of the proposed project, with the changes recommended by staff. Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Photo Exhibits (Existing Home) 3. Historic Resources Inventory Sheet 4. Project Plans 5. Development Standards for R-1-6 Zoning District (chart) 6. Letter from Applicant Prepared by: • J C. g L' , AI or Planner Reviewed by: haron Fierro, Community Development Director OFFICE OF CO Ty ASSESSOR SANTA po ~~/ O ~,t.P P I OP ~ 9TROM SUBDIVISION ' I SOUTH• THIRD `o p ea ~ as I ae se I u I u 1 ae 1 v.a° =/3 _ ~ w~ I I I I ~ ~ 5 >. °I; 13 =1A 1 i 6 1 7~ B i 9 i /O i // i /t a r -- s -~ I I I I ~' i 12 RI 15 I 16 I 17 ~ IB I 19 I 20 I 21 I 22 . _ uga__ I I I 1 ~__ I s~ - -I---i---r--r--f-- I T-- I .. ~ ao~~ - 3 a i 5 ~ 6 i T i e i s i to l u 6; o~~ I I I I i I x~ CLARA COU CALIFOR Attachment ~1 ~ o ~W~ ~ CURTIS SUBDIVISION (HYDE RESIDENCE~~~~-~~ n PARK _ sso.M-~iR STREET ~ sa.u a~ loo Is IoAq' `' 17 R 24R 33 M~ ~L1_STT a' ~ _L_ ,JB_ 60 - w' 34 W W:R ~ 23 - ___ > Eo' x z ~ I~ ~ ?I I 26 I~ I~ I~ P2 I ~/ 9- as _ ~ I I I I I I _ _ Ili B K ~ ~ t ~„/ I :a as I r-+r I I I as • a rr n I I I rr to -r Z9 ur / 279 N SOUTH ! FOURTH ar ~ STREET r sl lo ios p ' nu lava w u ao ao o s a: : na r er t ~ J7 W 12 J s $Q > a g 39 4_0 1/ ~Y , ,~ Y ? ~ ~~ R t*• ~'~ 13 0] ~ 3 ~ ~5 lu I : R Q¢ r I~ 30/ ~ ~ ;~ ~ I w ~ N $ ua wa '~ R I`La4 .. IIa ao w• uo nE.a• O " 2 I 1 ~ LOWELL rr WAY •~~ YO• -~~-_ 3 ~ no 33 31 ~ 7 Q y - - W T ~ roar roruro rorirr Aarr Aor rorr Jlewn P M 265- M-26 SOUTH -•~WINCHESTER " BK 305 8 R -- 7B --- 21 -- -- 6t2 -- ~ Ih D~ ~ 37 v R: t ° 77 20 -- __- _ - Y - _ __- -- 36 R £ S 4 S_ -~ - 19 -- 63 _- 4 O 39 3 >• g 76 I6 _ _ ~~ 40 !S'R R R ° IT -- --- -- - ~ __ __ _ 41 ~ R _ S R 73 I6 __ ___ - _ Z - ___ __ Ot R 7Y 15 42 ~ ° ° r -- "• Z ~ -- s~ -- 43 p ~x " ~ 7D _- 67 P _ W U ao• loo 29 I 44 ~ J N - Q W 8 7/ - 45 ~ 1!]d4-_ Of UMp)ElL as R 46 r.oa ro _...J L-... - - ._ - ¢- BLVD. _ ~ LAWRENCE E STONE -ASSESSOR Godoebd mop b nanm°nl Pvpoxs oiy camw.e una. R e r coax s~ atr EWISIM Rdl Yp 3001-a000 Attachnnent #2 henry 076.jpg (3264x2448x24b jpeg) henry 079.jpg (3284x2448x24b jpeg) Attachment #3 OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI # Y RECORD Trinomial Other Listings NRHP Status Code Review Code Reviewer Date Page 1 of 4 "`Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder): Berry House P1. Other identifier: None *P2. Location: ^ Not for Publication ®Unrestricted *a. County santa Clara county and (P2b and Plc or P2d. Attach a location map as necessary.) "b.USGS7.5Quad San Jose West Date 1980 photo revised T 7S R lE ;Mount Diablo g,M, c. Address: 189 South Third St. City Campbell Zip 95008 d. UTM:(give more than one for large andlor linear resources) Zone 10S 593300 mE/ 4126928 mN e.Other Locational Data: (e.g., parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate) West side of South Third Street north of Alice Avenue. APN# 412-05-059 "P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements, include design, material, condition, alterations, size, setting, and boundaries) This small vernacular cottage is located within the original Alice Ave. subdivision on a parcel separated from one of the original lots in 1939. A square building with an attached front porch (or stoop), and a small wing on the south side, it lies adjacent the rear alleyway that bisects the block from Winchester Blvd. to S. Third St. The building is of wood construction on a concrete foundation and is clad with wood v-groove siding. The siding is unsegmented in the wall planes, filling the wall panels from foundation to the roof fascias. The shake covered roof consists of two planes intersecting at a ridge that runs the width of the building, and lacks eaves, presenting a tight volume reflective of Colonial Revival houses. The front porch further enhances this image, the arched gable fronted roof appearing to lean against the front wall while braced at the outside edge with slender Tuscan columns. Fenestration consists of six-over-one double-hung wood windows, framed with flat board trim. Similar trimwork frames the corners of the building and acts as the roof fascias. (Continued on page 4, DPR523L) 'P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes) HP2 . Single family property "Pi4. ResaioesPresert ®Building ^ Structure ^ Object ^ Site ^ District ^ Element of District ^ Other (Isolates, etc.) P5b.Description of Photo: (View, date, accession #) View from north, 9/03 `P6. Date ConstructedlAge and Source: ® Historic ^ Prehistoric ^ Both Circa 1940 (Deeds, oral interview, 1978) 'P7. Owner and Address: Kenneth & Doreen Williams 2481 Kingfield Way San Jose, CA 95124 •P6. Recorded By: (Name, affiliation, and address) F.Maggi and B.MOntgomery Archives & Architecture 1901 S Bascom Ave. Suite 1530 Campbell, CA 95008 'P9. Date Recorded: 11 / 2 0 / 0 3 'P10. Survey Type: (Describe) *P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter "none".) Intensive Archives & Architecture: Campbell Historic Resources Inventory Update 2003 for the "Attachments: City of Campbell. ^ None ®Continuation Sheet ^ District Record ^ Rock Art Record ^ Other (List): ^ Location Map ®Building, Structure, and Object Record ^ Linear Feature Record ^ Artifact Record ^ Sketch Map ^ Archaeological Record ^ Milling Station Record ^ Photograph Record DPR 523A (1/95) * Required Information of California -The Resources Agency Primary # iRTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# ILDI'NG, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD Page 2 of 4 *NRHP/CRHR Status Code 4R Resource Name (Assigned by recorder) Berry House 61. HiStoriC Name: Harry and Rose Berry House B2. Common Name:None B3. Original Use: Single-family residential B4. Present Use: Single-family residential *B5. Architectural Style: Colonial Revival Cottage *66. Construction History: (Construction date, alterations, and date of alterations) Constructed circa 1940. *67. Moved? ®No ^ Yes ^ Unknown Date: Original Location: n/a *Bt3. Related Features: Garage B9a. Architect: unknown b. Builder: Gilbert Newcomb *610. Significance: Theme Architecture and Shelter Area: Campbell Period of Significance: 1915-1975 PropeAyType: Residential Applicable Criteria: A (Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period and geographic scope. Also address integrity.) Until 1940, this lot and the adjoining one at 133 Alice Avenue were one parcel. After Harry Berry built a house on the 133 Alice Ave. site in 1939, he subdivided the lot. The house and lot at 133 Alice Ave. was sold to Keith and Hazel Babb, and Mr. Berry kept the northerly portion of the lot, fronting South Third Street, for himself. Nadine Babb, daughter of Keith and Frances Babb, recalled in a 1977 interview that Gilbert Newcomb built this house for Harry and Rose Berry. The Berrys remained here until 1951, when they sold the house to Albert and Nellie Anderson (OR 2287:163), who were living in the house as late as 1979. (Continued on page 4, DPR523L) 611. Additional Resource Attributes: (list attributes and codes) None *B12. References: County of Santa Clara Official Records. Interview with Nadine Babb by Tom King, as part of the 1977-1978 City of Campbell Historic Survey, April 4, 1978. San Joae and Los Gatos city directories, 1939-1979. 613. Remarks: None *B14. Evaluator: Franklin Maggi *Date Of Evaluation: November 20, 2003 (This space reserved for official comments.) DPR 5236 (1195) (Sketch Map with north arrow required.) 4iP1Tli~E _ ~> lT 71uA,f ~ 3W~tf'* ,T .~~ 1 2 Nr:RdJAkE oA; .' ~ :,M N.. IJPS CH LIB ., a° N CENTER '- : ~ a ~f - _ none av A ~ can~aE~~ DRAT - ~ 1 E OR(`~q~ RCHARD-.C rY `o `~ s. _ : CITY .DR Q a 2 E14.i+tTT A4 Q' AV ~ ~E ,°,, RINCON AV «~ ~9~q:~Q`' N .v Tine - ti~ ~~ ~ SUNNY E STAU QQ ~ ?Aic7 JE ~ h KE DY AV D ~ E ~ ,f' ~ ~ coR AV ~'- ,f cus E ~•. 1 - wiT•.7S n~~T M~~. ?~ . `c~._ F Cy4v. r:~r3F : V ~ 'py >,~;: ~P , 07003 ThOmnf tams Maps *Required Information State°of California -The Resources /~ency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND'RECREATION HRI # _ .. _ __ . _ _ _ _ _ _ Trinomial Page 3 of 4 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) Berry xouse * Map Name: USGS San Jose west * Scale: n. t . s. * Date of Map: 1980 photo revised DPR 523J (1/95) *Required Information Mnp cued wuh TOPOI® ®1001 Ndioml6eogsphic (we-w.nntionel~eogaphiesomltopo? State of California -The Resources A®ency Primary # DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION HRI# Trinomial CONT'INllAT1ON SHEET Page 4 of 4 *Resource Name or # (Assigned by recorder) serry xouse * Recorded By F.Maggi and B.Montgomery * Date 11/20/2003 ® Continuation ^ Update (Continued from page 1, DPR523a, P3 a) The house appears to have its original front door, a slab door with a small viewing window in its upper portion. Also adding interest to the overall building design are small arched attic vents placed within the apex of the side gables. A detached garage is located to the rear that matches the house in material and design. It is accessed from the rear alleyway. The building and site have integrity of location, setting, 3esign, feeling, association, and workmanship to its 1939 construction date. (Continued from page 2, DPR523b, B10) The Berry House is within the original Hyde Residence Park consisting of 48 lots created along Alice Avenue in 1915, although not one of the original lots, but rather a reconfiguarion of a lot into two parcels. The subdivision was primarily developed over the next 25 years: none of the zouses are known to be architect designed and most were built by the original owners or by local carpenters. The neighborhood's vernacular architecture reflects the made-in-Campbell pride that Typified the town spirit when it was a fruit canning and packing center. Although most original Alice Avenue residents did not participate in the local canning and packing industries, they shaped the character of Campbell through their contributions as teachers, merchants, and community leaders. Most of the properties in the subdivision were first evaluated for historical significance in 1977. A subset of these properties were documented with DPR forms in 1984 and included in the Campbell Historic Resource Inventory. The subdivision was evaluated as a historic 3istrict in 1987. The Office of Historic Preservation (SHPO) found that the district may become eligible for the National Register but that it had not yet been adequately documented. SHPO excluded properties within the subdivision that were less that 50 years in age, including the Berry House. Subsequently, the Campbell City Council created the local Alice Avenue Historic District under Ordinance 1640. The City Council included the Berry House in the district, although it was not included in the SHPO review and had never been documented in any of the previous surveys. The house has a high level of integrity and may be eligible for listing as a part of a National Register District in the neighborhood under Criterion A. DPR 523E (1195) *Required Information Attachment #5 Development Standards for R-1-6 Zoning District: Standard: Required: Proposed/Existing: Compliance Notes: Front Yard 20' Existing fysb is Existing fysb is Setback nonconforming at 13'-2"; nonconforming. 8'-6" to existing and Proposed porch fysb proposed, relocated porch; requires administrative and, approval of the findings set forth for the Historic 20'+ to proposed dormers, Overlay District. The increased roof height and relocated porch maintains second story addition. the historic relationship to the street, and accommodates immediate front door access to the kitchen, amodern-day convenience. Side Yard Setback 5', or''/z North sysb: 4'-6" (existing North sysb for the second bldg. ht. and proposed); and, story requires administrative (whichever approval of the findings set is greater); South sysb: 12'-0" (existing forth for the Historic or, 5' with and proposed) Overlay District. PC Continuation of the second approval. story in one vertical mass is indicative of the Colonial Rival style. South sysb complies. Street Side Yard 12' n/a Alley does not qualify as a "street". Rear Yard Setback 5', or''/z 5'-0" to existing shed; and, Complies. bldg. ht. 28'-10" to proposed addition. (whichever is greater) Development Standards for R-1-6 Zoning District: Standard: Required: ProposedlExisting: Compliance Notes: Setback to 10' 7'-10" (proposed) Proposed setback requires Accessory administrative approval of Structure the findings set forth for the Historic Overlay Districx The resulting home, only 1,420 sf, modestly accommodates modern-day living while maintaining the traditional, detached spacial relationship between the historic home and the shed on a substandard-sized lot. Height 35' max.; 22'-2" (proposed) Complies. 2-1/2 stories max. Lot Coverage 40% max. 37% (including porch) Complies. Floor Ratio Ratio .45 max; .456 (including porch) Requires PC approval to (FAR) or, .50 with increase up to .50. PC approval. Lot Size: 6,000 sf 49' x 75' (3,675 sf) Existing lot size is nonconforming. Parking: 2 (with 1 No existing or proposed on- Requires PC approval of a covered) site parking. Parking Exception. Attachment #6 Critch iela Construction. Inc. License #773386 www.clitchfield-construction:com 845 S. McGlincy Lane • Campbell, CA 95008 Office 408.371.3777 • Fax 408.371.4777 December 2, 2005 Campbell HPD 189 S. Third St. Campbell, CA. 95008 • We intend to roof the project with Decra brand products, proposing either the shake or shingle variety. Spec's and colors attached herein. One of the two green accented colors will be proposed. • The shutters will be installed on the two (2) front facing windows only, of moderate size and design (indicated on proposed elevation), painted green (to accent the green in roof materials). • Field colors will be white, with the only accent being the green shutters. • We hope to install Andersen modified Colonial Windows to keep faith with the 6 over 1 style present (*Andersen will modify the mulling to our specifications with the 400 series -see custom pattern example). • We propose to install one (1) porch-light Burnished Chestnut Wall Lantern (see attached scan/photograph. Thank you again for considering our services. Sincerely, Ricky Critchfield President Critchfield Construction, Inc. RECG~VED DEC 0 2 2005 CI ANN NG D P L P Critch f field cu~structiu~, ~~c. License # 773386 Besidenfial Design Commercial Ricky Clitchfield President Cdl: 408.315.6706 ricky@critchfield-construction.com 845 S. McGlincy Lane Campbell, CA 95008 Phone: 408.371.3777 Fan: 408.371.4777 www.critchfu:ld-construction.com . ,. f , ~;° *~.~" >~ ~ ~: r'~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~ -. 4 .~~~~~ ~,' f ,...$~ U Stone Coated Steel Roofing Systems f DECRA Roofing Systems, Inc., Corona CA 1.877.GO.DEGRA Ia~~~.32721 I www.decra.com Shake Shinale i~ v, Shinale Plus Tile Panel Size - 14-5/8"x 53" 21"x 52" 16-1/2"x 52" 16-1/2"x 52" Installed Exposure - 12-5/8"x S1" 19-3/4"x 49" 14-1/4"x SO" 14-1/2"x SO" Panels per Square - 22.4 15 20 20 Installed Weight - 150 Ibs/sq 125Ibs/sq 1501bs/sq 1 SO Ibs/sq Shingle /Shingle Plus Colors y C ~ a ~ ~ T w ~ ~ O] ~! L V7 C o ~ ~°' ~+ T C C Y ~ 3 ~ c °o v ~ ~> 3 ^~^^ Tile /Shake Colors i' ,~ T ~ T O ~ ~..i J r ~ 3 O i y ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~i _ ~ o m m V ~ ~ v ~ r+ C Q O V Y ~ v Y i (0 ~ a ~ v° ` H N ~ ~ ~ ~ t0 ~ t p ~ ~ N 3 ~ r ` W. 1 r ,~ t-~ W s~ ~ ~ i : . 1 :;,?- ~~' -w2 r >i` _~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . i CJ .~ r f ~ ~ ' 4 ` ~ . t _x ~, 1 " '- ~t~r .r ~ Warranties: Testing and Approvals: SOYearLimitedWarranty ^ ^ ASTMG26-Accelerated Weathering Test 120 MPH Wind Speed Warrarty ^ ^ ASTM G90-Accelerated WeatheringTest for Emmaqua Machines,Arizona Hail Stone Penetration Warranty ^ ^ FreezeThaw CyrleTesting -Rohm & Haas Research Laboratories, Pennsylvania ^ Wind and Wind Driven Rain Resistance to Dade County Protocd PA 100 ^ Wind Driven Rain and Wind Resistance to KBO Aaeptance COCTIpOSItIOn: ^ Low Speed Dynamic Rain PenetrationTest byExperimental Building Station,Australia ^ High Velocity Developmerrtal Wind Test (130 MPH) -The Center for Applied Engineering Steel-26 Gauge,Aluminum-Zinc(Zncalume)Alby ^ Australian5tandard1170-Cyclonet.oadingTesttotheWindLoadingCode Coating,/krylici'riming System, Basecoat,Cerdmic ^ UL580&UL1897-Roof DeckConstnictionsandRoofing5ystems,UpliftResistance Coated Stone Granules,Overglaze ^ ASTM6117-Sah/FogTest ^ ASTM D2247 -10096 Relative Humid'rtyTest ^ Atmospheric Corrosion Resistance-BIKlntemational,USA Evaluations: ^ N6523-Hail ResistanceTest-TerralabEngineerslntl,Utah ^ UL2218-Class4Rating-Impact Resistance CCMC10241-RTile,Shake&ShingleFlus ^ ^ ConcentratedLoad/WalkabilityTest-ICBO CCMC 13085-R Shingle ^ ^ Australia Standard 1562 -Concentrated force on RoofingTiles LACrtyReport#24151Tile,Shake&ShinglePlus ^ ^ CCMCTraffxLoadTest LA Crty Report #25463 Shingle ^ ^ CCMC Uniform (Snow Load Test) Load ICCLegacyReportER4361 ^ ^ ASTMD522-93a-Coating FlexibilityTest ESR 1753 (IBQ ^ ^ ASTM D2794 - 93 - Reverse ImpadTest ESR 1754 (IBC) ^ ^ ASTM E108 & UL790-Class A, B & C Fre Rated ESR 1483 (IBC) ^ ^ Australian Standard 1530,Part 3 - Early Fre HazardTest Dade County#04-0831.01Tile,Shake&ShinglePlus ^ ^ ASTME72-RadcingTest Dade County #04-0831.025hingle ^ ^ ASTME408-TotalNormalEmittanceoFSurfacPS-MistCxeyrr~eeCSminimumerrazsiviryof9fa'LEL-D Texas Department oflnsuranceReport#RC08^ ^ASTME903-SolarAbsorptance,Reflectance,arxiTransmittanceofMaterials Mist Grey complies with Energy Star requirements ~ ~A~~ ... c ~ ~ L °_' o z ~~~ ... U W QA (7 ri 00 N V 00 J Q N v~ O O v k :+ O ~. G N 400 Series Woodwright® Double-Hung Windows WAnderseno ~ Standard Divided Ught Patterns for Woodwright® and Standard Tilt-Wash Double-Hung Picture Windows ulrt YNdtll& 4'-3s/ts"(1303) T0i 9110!!. VFcre11111 Pgi1bA to ~ I 5'-7 5/ts" (1710) '~ F1>4; 1?II~ ~' e VIT10 dr DHP 42, 410, 56 v 42310 410310 56310 ~ 4242 41042 5642 4246 41048 5646 ~~ 42410 410410 5&10 4252 41052 5652 ~,~ ti 4256 41056 5656 ao ~ ~ 42510 410510 56510 ~"~ 426Z 41062 5662 io Specified Equal Light and Custom Patterns are also available. For more information on Andersen divided light, see page 6. Grilles shown are spaced for equal sash double-hung akgnmerrt. Gripe ahgnmeM a different for unequal double- hungunits. Be sure to specify correct aFgnmerd for picWre windows. * Also available with a 2-1/4" grille to simulate a check rail. (not available on 400 tilt-wash picture window) ~a~~ Te 6 ~ "Andersen", and [he AW logo are registered trademarks of Andersen Coryoration. All other marks where tlenotetl are marks of Andersen Corporation. ®2005 Andersen Corporation. All fights reserved. 400 Series Woodwright® Double-Hung Windows Andersena WINDOWS•DOORS Standard Divided Light Patterns for WoodwHght® and Standard Tlit-Wash Double-Hung Windows udt Dlmenslar 1'-9 s/e" (549) WNIh & ~ Both grille patterns are available for all units in upper sash only (USO). H WDH8TW18 ~ t7~lOtrol ~~ ~ * Cottage style sash are available for Woodwrighta double-hung windows in all standard widths and heights between 310 and 62. See page 42. 18210 ,n 1832 t 72 and 76 heights only available for 400 Series tilt-wash windows. ~ ~ 1836 m s --- 18310 Specified Equal Light and Custom Patterns are also available. 1842 For more information on Andersen divided light, see page 6. ° q 1848 " I ~' 18410 -1-- 1852 Speelfled Equal ugfit and l~stam Pattern examples 1858 ^ ^ ao ~ ~ ~~ ~ *Cottage Equal *Cottage Equal Specified EqualLigh[ Custom Pattern Sash Sash Sash Sash ~ T-- ~ ~ iasio ~ Double-Hung Divided Light Ordering Prefix ' ~ m iesz 400 TiR•Wash 400 WoodtwrlgM 1872 t ~ ~ 1875 t DouWe•Hung 7W WDH ~ ~ Picture DHP WPW Transom DHT WIR ~Af[ 2'-1 5/a" (651) to 2'-11 s/a" (905) D~nME{011 ~' a taws a Tw 20, za, 2s, 20, no Heig1R Range ~ ~~ 20210 24210 26210 28210 ~ 210210 m 2032 2432 2632 2832 21032 2036 2436 2636 2836 21036 c m 20310 24310 26310 28310 210310 ~ 2042 2442 2642 2842 21042 °~ 2046 2448 2646 2846 21046 ~ 20410 24410 2&110 28410 210410 2052 2452 2852 2852 21052 c ~ 2056 2458 2656 2858 21056 00 *Cottage Equal *Cottage Equal Sash Sash Sash Sash rn a~'.o c"'n 20510 24510 26510 28510 210510 ~ ;~ 2082 2482 2682 2882 21062 2072 t 2472 t 2672 t 2872 t 21072 t o ao 2076fi 2476f 2678fi 2876f 21078f in "Andersen', and the AW logo are registered trademarks of Antlersen Corporation. AN other madcs where denoted are marks of Andersen Corporation. ©2005 Andersen Corporation. All rights reserved. burnished chestnut wall lantem.jpg (1lH)x100x24b jpeg) Development Standards for R-1-6 Zoning District: Standard: Required: ProposedlExisting: Compliance Notes: Front Yard 20' Existing fysb is Existing fysb is Setback nonconforming at 13'-2"; nonconforming. 8'-6" to existing and Proposed porch fysb proposed, relocated porch; requires administrative and, approval of the findings set forth for the Historic 20'+ to proposed dormers, Overlay District. The increased roof height and relocated porch maintains second story addition. the historic relationship to the street, and accommodates immediate front door access to the kitchen, amodern-day convenience. Side Yard Setback 5', or''/z North sysb: 4'-6" (existing North sysb for the second bldg. ht. and proposed); and, story requires administrative (whichever approval of the findings set is greater); South sysb: 12'-0" (existing forth for the Historic or, 5' with and proposed) Overlay District. PC Continuation of the second approval. story in one vertical mass is indicative of the Colonial Rival style. South sysb complies. Street Side Yard 12' n/a Alley does not qualify as a "street". Rear Yard Setback 5', or''/z 5'-0" to existing shed; and, Complies. bldg. ht. 28'-10" to proposed addition. (whichever is greater) Development Standards for R-1-6 Zoning District: Standard: Required: Proposed/Existing: Compliance Notes: Setback to 10' 7'-10" (proposed) Proposed setback requires Accessory administrative approval of Structure the findings set forth for the Historic Overlay District The resulting home, only 1,420 sf, modestly accommodates modern-day living while maintaining the traditional, detached spacial relationship between the historic home and the shed on a substandard-sized lot. Height 35' max.; 22'-2" (proposed) Complies. 2-1/2 stories max. Lot Coverage 40% max. 37% (including porch) Complies. Floor Ratio Ratio .45 max; .456 (including porch) Requires PC approval to (FAR) or, .50 with increase up to .50. PC approval. Lot Size: 6,000 sf 49' x 75' (3,675 sf) Existing lot size is nonconforming. Parking: 2 (with 1 No existing or proposed on- Requires PC approval of a covered) site parking. Parking Exception.