Rincon 79-14 - File 1County of Santa Clara
L,oeol Aancy Fonndlon Commiglon
County Administration Building
70 West Heddinp Street, East Wing
Sen Jose, California 95110
2 g g ~~Area Code aoe
California
~ [~C~L~OdL~
D
~1 L 101980
EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE OF FILI
OF FtESOT i~TT`i~ `1 r. nvor.TrnTTnN CITY ~F' CAMPBELL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
The undersigned certifies as follows:
I am the duly selected and acting Executive Officer of the Santa
Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission.
A resolution entitled, " RESOLUTION OF APPLICATION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL PROPOSING ANNEXATION O DE N TE
A AS TO THE CITY OF CAMPBELL"
and designated as RINCON 79-14
was filed with me on June 25 1980 .
Said resolution has been duly adopted by the legislative body of
City of Campbell which is an affected-ey/city/
r3~#~iet, as defined in applicable law. Pursuant to Sections 35140-35141/
~-}9<_-~o, inclusive, Government Code, I have examined the resolution
and the supplemental application filed with this proposal and find these
documents to contain all the information and data requested by the Santa
Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission.
Based upon such examination, it is HEREBY DETE}~iINED AND CERTIFIED
that this resolution of application is hereby being certified for filing
on the date shown below.
196 0
This resolution will be considered at the August 6
meeting of the Local Agency Formation Commission.
Dated: ~" ~ 4
LOCAL AGENCY FOgMATION COMMISSION
WILLIAM M. SIEGEL, Executive Officer
y ~,~ ~
'pawl E. Sagers
Assistant Execu ive Officer
78-7c
Resolution of Application
RESOLUTION N0. 584 1
Resolution of Application of the City Council of the City of Campbell, proposing
annexation of designated areas to the City of Campbell pursuant to the 1unicipal
Organization Act of 1977.
SECTION 1. APPLICATION FOR A CHANGE OF ORGANIZATION. This reolutlon is a
proposaTma~e pursuant to the Municipal Organization Act of 1977 (Government Code
Section 35000, et seq.) and more particularly under Sections 35013 end 35150(f)
thereof, fora change of organization, that being the annexation of the territories
described in the attached exhibits to the City of Campbell.
SECTION 2. DESCRIPTION OF TERRITORY. The area proposed for annexation to
the City o ampbell is designated as: RlNCOr~ 79-14
A metes and bounds description and a map o t e terr for es propose to be annexed
are attached as Exhibit A and Exhibit B.
SECTION 3. REASONS FOR ANNEXATION. The reasons for the proposed annexation
are thatt territory proposed to De annexed:
(a) Is less than 100 acres in area, as appears in the exhibits attached
hereto,
(b) Is surrounded by the City of Campbell, and includes the entire area
surrounded,
(c) Is substantially developed.
(d) Is not prime agricultural land as defined by Government Code
Section 35046, and
(e) Is both receiving benefits from the City of Campbell and will
receive benefit from the annexation.
SECTION 4. PREZONING. The property has been prezoned by the City of Campbell.
SECTION 5. PUBLIC MEETING. Pursuant to appropriate notice, a public meeting
was hel on ay 7 and 8, 1979 and on February 4, 1980 for the purpose of informing
the residents and landowners of the territory proposed to be annexed of the intent of
the City of Campbell to initiate annexation proceedings, to inform them of the process
to De followed, and to hear the concerns of those affected by the proposal, as required
by the rules and regulations of the Santa Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission.
SECTION 6. REQUEST FOR ANNEXATION. The City Council hereby requests the
Santa Cara ounty Local Agency Formation Commission and the Board of Supervisors of
the County of Santa Clara to conduct proceedings for annexation of these territories
to the City of Campbell.
SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE OF ANNEXATION. The City Council requests that
effective ante of the ISLAND ANNEXATIONS be fixed as the date of the recordation
with the County Recorder of a certified ropy of the certification of proceedings
under Government Code Section 35352.
SECTION 8. FILING. The City Clerk is directed to file with the Executive
Officer o~fi~anta Clara County Local Agency Formation Commission, twelve certified
copies of this resolution together with twelve copies of the site specific plan for
providing services within the territory to be annexed as approved by the City Council
on June 23, 1980.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Gmpbell at a regular
meeting held on the 23rd day of June, 1980 by the following roll ull vote:
AYES: Councilmen: Paul, Chamberlin. Podgorsek. Nammer
NOES: Councilmen: None
ABSENT: Councilmen: Doetsch
APPROYED:
sse
/
~ . r, yor
ATTEST: //
~/~
~-" ~
y
S C er,
y ! THC FOREGOING INSTRUMENT 19 A TRUE
AND CORRCCT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL
ON FILE IN THIS
OFFICE,
ATTEST: PHY LIS O, ACKER, CITY CLERK
CITY OF
M LL, CAUFORNI /~~/~~ ~~ ~
8Y ~
L~Gi~~ivL/
J/ATED f~ ~7~
SITE SPECIFIC PLAN FOR SERVICE
Introduction
This Site Specific Plan has been prepared in response to LAFCO planning requirements for
evaluating annexation proposals under the ~~lunicipal Organization Act of 1978. This plan
is based upon the Master Plan for Services, which was approved by the City Council on
June 23, 1980.
The ~ii.e Specific Plan describes how services will be provided to: Annexation Area
Number 6 ;known as Rincon 79-14
(NOTE: The island number refers to the map, Exhibit H in the Master Plan for Services.)
I. FIRE PROTECTION AND PREVENTION SERVICE
1. Will there be a change in the agency that provides fire protection and
prevention service?
No (present agency)
XX Yes (proposed agency) City of Campbell Fire Department
2. If Yes to the above, what is the location, response time, staffing and
equipment for the fire station proposed to serve the area? How does this
compare to the location, staffing and equipment of the existing fire station
and existing response time?
City of Campbell Fire Department will respond from its Sunnyoaks Fire
Station. Standard response is two engine companies and a Paramedic unit.
Response time is 2-3 minutes.
Central Fire District presently serves this area from its Lark Avenue
Station. Response time is 4-5 minutes.
3. Hoar does this proposal relate to provision in the Master Plan for Services
for:
A. Expansion and/or reorganization of fire service?
It is consistent with the Master Plan for Services. The City currently
has capacity to provide full services and responds to emergencies in
this area.
B. Financing of fire service?
As stated in the Master Plan, fire services are financed through the
general operating funds.
4. Will there be an I.S.O. (Insurance Services Office) rating change?
No.
II. POLICE PROTECTION
1. l~1i11 there be a change in the agency that provides police protection?
No (present agency) Santa Clara County Sheriff's Department
~- Yes (Proposed agency) City of Campbell Police Department
-2-
2. Describe the type and level of police service currently provided to the area.
Currently police service provided to unincorporated areas within the City
of Campbell Urban Service Area is the basic level of law enforcement provided
by the Santa Clara County Sheriff's Department. General patrol through these
areas is greatly limited and traffic enforcement and vehicle abatement are
virtually non-existent. Response time varies widely and has been reported to
be as great as 20 minutes. City of Campbell units are dispatched for emergencies
when available.
3. Will changes be necessary to provide police protection to this area equal to
the standards established for the rest of your City?
A. Contract changes (only for cities that contract with the County Sheriff)
-not applicable.
B. Equipment - current equipment is ample.
C. Manpower - current manpower is sufficient.
D. Beat Patrol - annexed areas will be incorporated into existing beats
without lowering service levels to current City.
III. LIBRARY SERVICE
1. l,lill there be a change in the jurisdiction responsible for providing library
service to residents in the affected area?
XX No (present agency) Santa Clara County Library
Yes (proposed agency)
2. If there is a change in library responsibility discuss any service changes
that will result.
3. How does this proposal relate to provisions in the Master Plan for Service
for:
A. Library expansion and/or reorganization. It is consistent with the
Master Plan, no changes will be required.
6. Library funding. Funding will continued to be provided as indicated
in the Master Plan for services.
IV. PARK AND RECREATION
1. What are the locations of the nearest City Park and Recreation program
facilities?
The nearest City of Campbell Park is John D. Morgan Park.
-3-
V. STREETS
Substantially Developed or Developing Territory
1. Will the City require facilities in the area to be upgraded to City
standards?
No, except in cases of further development or redevelopment.
2. What are the City standards as described in the Master Plan for Services
that would be applied to the affected area for street maintenance and
financing of same.
The City will maintain all public streets as required and maintenance
will be financed in the same manner as other City streets.
VI. STREET SWEEPING
What is the City's standard for street sweeping that will be applied to the area?
Residential streets will be swept once each month, except where curbs are lacking.
Experience has shown that mechanical sweeping without curbs has minimal positive
effect. No street sweeping standards have been adopted for streets without curbs.
VII. WATER SUPPLY
1. Is a governmental agency currently supplying the area with water?
XX No
Yes, name of agency:
2. If not served by an agency, how is water provided to the area?
Water is provided by the San Jose Water Works Company.
3. According to the Master Plan for Service:
A. Will hook-up to the water agency be required?
No. Unless replacement of system is necessary for health or safety
reasons.
VIII. GAS AND ELECTRICITY
1. Will there be a change in the provider of this utility service if the
proposal becomes effective? If so, discuss what the change will be and
any costs or service implications of the change.
There will be no change. Pacific Gas and Electric Company will continue
service at rates approved by the Public Utilities Commission. These
rates are the same for residents of both the incorporated and the
unincorporated areas.
-4-
IX. GARBAGE COLLECTION
1. What is the agency that presently collects garbage in the area and what is
the present rate structure for this service?
Green Valley Disposal Company, current monthly rates are:
1 can - $3.00; Each additional can - $1.95
2. Were this proposal to become effective, will the agency that performs
this service change, and if so, what agency will become responsible for
garbage collection?
No.
3. How many cans will be allowed and how much will garbage collection service
cost if the proposal becomes effective?
The same rates apply to both incorporated and unincorporated territory.
X. SANITARY SEWER
1. Do sanitary sewers exist in the area?
Yes.
2. Will there be a change in the agency currently responsible for providing
sanitary sewer service if the proposal becomes effective?
No.
3. According to the Master Plan for Services:
A. Do the local collectors and trunk lines have adequate capacity to serve
the area?
Yes.
B. If not, what additional improvements are necessary?
C. How will these improvements be financed?
Improvements to the system will be financed by the users.
4. For existing developments with septic tanks:
4Ji11 hook-up to the City system be required?
No except in cases of septic tank failure where sewer main is installed.
5. If existing development is served by septic tank and hook-up to the City
is not required as a condition of annexation, can property owners request
hook-up to the City sewer system?
Yes
-5-
X1. STORr4 DRAINS
1. Are storm drainage facilities currently provided to the area?
Yes
2. If storm drains do not exist in the area, or if the storm drains that are
in existence do not meet City standards, will the City require that storm
drains be installed and/or improved? If so, when?
XII. FLOOD CONTROL
1. Is the City currently participating in the National Flood Insurance
Program? If not, does the City plan to do so in the future? When?
Yes
2. Is the territory affected by this proposal within the area of a 1% flood
as delineated by the Santa Clara Valley Water District or the National
Flood Insurance Program.
No.
XIII. STREET LIGHTING
1. Are there street lights in the area provided by the County Lighting
Service Area?
Yes
2. If yes, will the City assume jurisdiction of this service upon annexation?
Yes.
3. If there are no street lights in the area, will the City require them
installed upon annexation?
XIV. OTHER SERVICES
1. List other services and/or improvements the City will provide the territory
affected by this proposal and indicate when these services or improvements
will be provided.
City services will be available upon the effective date of annexation.
These include a wide range of services funded through the Federal
Government, including employment and training programs, Community Development
Block Grant programs, such as housing rehabilitation. A variety of regular
City programs would also become available, including voluntary safety
inspections, security programs and street tree planting, complaint
investigations, community services programs such as recreation programs,
senior citizen taxi discount and a senior center.
The City of Campbell also offers a Senior Nutrition Program and a
Paramedic Service.
-6-
2. What will the costs of these services and/or improvements be and how will
they be financed?
Costs will depend upon qualification under Federal regulations, City Council
decision on target areas, and voluntary citizen involvement. Financing is
through Federal Grants and City general operating fund and will not necessitate
additional costs to area residents.
3. Is Cable TV now available in the area and, if so, described any changes this
proposal would have on this service.
Cable TV is currently available to residents. No change will result.
4. Will the existing street numbering or postal service be altered in any way
as a result of this proposal and,if so, explain.
No. Street numbering and postal service levels will not be affected.
XV. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
1. Are there any operating special assessment or improvement districts operating
within the territory included in this proposal.
No. Any assessment or improvement districts were established in the County.
2. If yes:
A. Why and when was the District created?
6. What is the current outstanding financial obligation and how many more
years will it take to retire this debt?
XVI. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
1. Itemize and compare the present property tax rates in the subject area to
the property tax rates after annexation for this current fiscal year.
The basic tax rate for all areas, under Proposition 13, is $4.00 per hundred
dollars assessed valuation. The City has outstanding voter approval bonded
indebtedness for parks, City Hall, Library, and similar long-term projects
which benefit all area residents.
To pay for these projects, the City has levied an additional tax of 20 cents
for $100 assessed valuation for 1979-80. Other agencies, such as school
districts, may also have a tax rate to cover bonded indebtedness; however,
these would apply regardless of annexation.
The following table shows the City property tax amounts that would be
added upon annexation.
-7-
~tarket Value
80,000
100,000
120,000
150,000
175,000
200,000
Assessed Value
20,000
25,000
30,000
37,500
43,750
50,000
Less Homeowners Exemption
1750
1750
1750
1750
1750
1750
City Tax
(.20/$100 A.V.)
36.50
46.50
56.50
71.50
84.00
96.50
2. Will this area be subject to any other special taxes and/or fees upon
annexation? For example, utility taxes, construction and conveyance
taxes, business licenses, other fees. If so, please describe the tax
or fee and the rates associated with each.
Yes. The City has a construction tax of one-half of one percent (.5%)
of the total value of new construction. A business license tax of
530.00 per year is charged including home occupations conducted in a
residential zoning area.
In addition, the City has a fee schedule for planning application,
engineering services and building permits.
XVII. LAND USE REGULATION
1. Are there parcels in the territory included in this proposal where the
existing developed land use differs from the land use permitted by the
City's prezoning?
No. The primary uses conform to City prezoning.
-8-
ISLAND # 6 Rincon 79-14
Individual Island data for Site Specific Plan for Services:
1. Number of acres ............................................ 8.234 +
2. Number of inhabitants ...................................... 117 +
3. Number of registered voters ................................ 42
4. Number of dwelling units ................................... 39
5. What is the present use of the area ........................ Single-Family Residential
6. Parcels under Williamson Bill Contract? .................... None
7. What prezoning has been applied? ........................... R-1 (Single-Family
Residential)
8. List all cities, special districts and county service areas located within the
area contained in this proposal:
West Valley College District Sanitation District No. 4
Santa Clara County Valley Water District .Central Fire District
Campbell Union School District County Lighting District
9. For City annexations pursuant to ~10RGA, list those concurrent or future
detachments from Special Districts which are proposed for this territory.
Central Fire District
County Lighting Service District
EXHIBIT "A"
PROPOSED ANNEXATION
RINCON 1979-14
BEGINNING at the northeast corner of Lot 41 as shown upon that certain map
of Tract No. 1919 filed in Volume 81 of Maps at pages 55 and 56 in the office
of the County Recorder, County of Santa Clara, State of California;
THENCE, along the easterly line of said Lot 41, said easterly line also being
in the existing Campbell city limits line as established by Ordinance No. 741,
Campbell Annexation Sunnyoaks 1970-3, dated November 9, 1970, South 16° 28' 50"
West 119.59 feet to its point of intersection with the northerly line of Friar
Way as shown upon said map, said northerly line also being a curve that is
concave southerly and has a radius of 345.00 feet, said radius being a prolonga-
tion of aforesaid easterly line;
THENCE, easterly along the arc of said curve through a central angle of
11° 22' 11" a distance of 68.46 feet to its point of reverse curvature with
a curve that is concave northwesterly and has a radius of 20.00 feet;
THENCE, easterly and northeasterly along the arc of last mentioned curve
through a central angle of 86 04' 21" a distance of 30.04 feet to its point
of tangency with the northwesterly line of Winchester Boulevard (80.00 feet
wide) as shown upon that certain Record of Survey filed in Book 192 of Maps
at page 37 in said office of the County Recorder;
THENCE, along said northwesterly line South 32° 33' 18" West 100.65 feet to
its point of tangency with a curve that is concave westerly and has a ,__
radius of 20.00 feet;
THENCE, northerly and northwesterly along the arc of last mentioned curve
through a central angle of 950 24' 48" a distance of 33.31 feet to its point
of tangency with a curve that is concave southerly and has a radius of
285.00 feet, last mentioned curve also being in the southerly line of said
Friar Way;
THENCE, westerly along the arc of last mentioned curve through a central
angle of 12° 09' 00" a distance of 60.44 feet to the northeast corner of
Lot 2 as shown upon said map of Tract No. 1919;
THENCE, alongn~rsectionlwithnthefnortherly lineuof Lot 35asOshownsupo~lsa3d
feet to its
map;
1 of 2
THENCE, along said northerly line of Lot 3 North 720 04' 51" West 52.00 feet
to its point of intersection with a curve that is concave northwesterly and
has a radius of 42.00 feet, said radius being a prolongation of last mentioned
northerly line, last mentioned curve also being in the southeasterly line
of Justo Court as shown upon said map;
THENCE, southwesterly along the arc of last mentioned curve through a central
angle of 41° 19' 08" a distance of 30.29 feet to the most westerly corner
of said Lot 3;
THENCE, along the southwesterly line of said Lot 3 South 30° 45' 43" East
95.14 feet to the most northerly corner of Parcel M as shown upon said
Record of Survey;
THENCE, along the northwesterly line of said Parcel M South 35° 16' 32"
West 22.99 feet to its intersection with the southerly line of Lot 4 as
shown upon said map;
THENCE, along said southerly line of Lot 4 and its westerly prolongation
South 89° 47' 00" West 809.34 feet to a point on a curve that is concave
easterly and has a radius of 940.00 feet, last mentioned curve being in the
southwesterly line of Lot 18 as shown upon said map and its northerly prolonga-
tion;
THENCE, from a tangent bearing North 33° 42' 42" West nor~herly along the
arc of last mentioned curve through a central angle of 12 06' 50" a distance
of 198.74 feet to the most southerly corner of Parcel C as shown upon that
certain Record of Survey filed in Book 192 of Maps at page 36 in said office
of the County Recorder, said most southerly corner also being the northwest
corner of Lot 20 as shown upon said map;
THENCE, along the easterly line of said Parcel C and its northerly prolonga-
tion North 11° 51' 43" West 202.11 feet to its intersection with the northerly
line of Lot 22 as shown upon said map of Tract No. 1919;
THENCE, leaving aforesaid Annexation Sunnyoaks 1970-3, along said northerly
line of Lot 22 and its easterly prolongation last mentioned northerly line
and easterly prolongation also being in the existing Campbell city limits
line as rs12b11960a Nor~hd89$n47'N00"2EastC1m071~13Afeetato the9P0INT~OFated
Septembe ,
BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 8.234 acres, more or less, and being a portion of said Tract
No. 1919.
2 of 2