PC Min 01/10/1989PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA
7:30 P.M. MINUTES JANUARY 10, 1989
The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular
session in the City Hall Council Chambers, 70 N. First St., Campbell,
California.
ROLL CALL
Present Commissioners: George Kasolas, Jay Perrine,
Ron Christ, Robert Stanton, James Walker,
DuWayne Dickson, and Bruce Olszewski; Acting
Planning Director Phil Stafford, Planner II
Tim Haley, Engineering Manager Bill Helms,
City Attorney Bill Seligmann, and Recording
Secretary Linda Dennis.
Absent None.
Chairman Christ relinquished the Chair to newly elected Chairman Olszewski.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
M/S: Christ, Walker - That the minutes of the Planning Commission
meeting of December 13, 1988 be approved with
the following corrections. Motion carried
unanimously (6-0-0-1, with Commissioner
Dickson abstaining due to absence from the
12-13-88 meeting).
Pg. 10, last paragraph - "...eliminate
landscaping which would result in either (1)
building up, or (2) eliminate landscaoine.
both which would result in an inordinate
amount of land dedicated to the automobile."
Page 12, last paragraph - "This site was
intensely developed and pavement treatment
was added as an aesthetic element."
COMMUNICATIONS
Acting Planning Director Stafford noted that communications received pertained
to specific items on the agenda.
PRESENTATIONS
Chairman Olszewski presented a plaque to out-going Chairman Christ.
City Manager Kevin Duggan introduced the newly appointed Planning Director,
Steve Piasecki.
-2-
PUBLIC HEARINGS
PD 88-10 Continued public hearing to consider the
Ward, G. application of Greg Ward for approval of a
Planned Development Permit, plans,
elevations, and development schedule to allow
the construction of 3 townhomes on property
known as 1430 W. Latimer Ave. in a PD
(Planned Development/Medium Density
Residential) Zoning District.
Acting Planning Director Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of January 10,
1988, noting that Staff is recommending denial of this application in that
revised plans have not been received and the item should be removed from the
agenda.
Chairman Olszewski opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on
this item.
M/S: Walker, Stanton - That the public hearing on PD 88-10 be
closed, no one wishing to speak. Motion
carried unanimously (7-0-0).
M/S: Stanton, Perrine - That the Planning Commission recommend that
the City Council accept the Negative
Declaration which has been prepared for this
project; and that the Planning Commission
adopt Resolution No. 2574, incorporating the
attached findings, recommending that the
City Council deny PD 88-10. Motion carried
with the following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine, Christ, Stanton, Walker,
Dickson, Olszewski
NOES: Commissioners: None
ABSENT: Commissioners: None.
~ ~
M 88-20 Continued public hearing to consider the
Bonnett, R. application of Mr. Robert Bonnett for
approval of a modification to a previously
approved Planned Development Permit to allow
a revised parking plan on property known as
145 Dillon Ave. in a PD (Planned
Development/Industrial) Zoning District.
Planner II Haley reviewed the Staff Report of January 10, 1989, and noted that
the Public Works Staff has expressed concern regarding the applicant's
expectations regarding the formation of a parking district as a solution to his
problem.
Commissioner Christ expressed a concern that the building is already occupied
and improvements have not be installed; and, he asked if there was any
provision to provide a temporary relocation of parking while improvements are
being installed.
-3-
Engineering Manager Helms noted that the "nose-in" parking on Dell Ave. would
not be part of this application; and, it would be possible. to access the site
for parking during the construction phase.
Chairman Olszewski noted his understanding that there is an existing
nonconforming use on the site, and asked if this was the building being
discussed.
City Attorney Seligmann indicated that technically the building is not
nonconforming, but simply illegally developed.
Mr. Stafford indicated that this situation is in response to a code enforcement
issue. Additionally, in response to the input from the Public Works
Department, Staff's recommendation at this time is for denial.
Commissioner Stanton reported that this item was discussed by the Site and
Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending denial and
requesting that the property be brought into conformance with the code.
Commissioner Kasolas stated that the real issue is whether there is sufficient
parking to accommodate the revised plan - if so, how did the Site Committee
come up with such a different opinion that the Staff?
Mr. Stafford explained that the Planning Staff's recommendation for approval,
as indicated in the Staff Report of January 10, 1989, did not have the input
from the Public Works Department regarding the fact that a parking district to
benefit this property is very unlikely. However, with this additional
information, Planning Staff would recommend denial.
Commissioner Kasolas asked, if a parking district were being contemplated at
the time of a recommendation for approval, how long a time period was Staff
anticipating that a district would be formed to benefit this project?
Mr. Stafford believed Staff was looking at something relatively soon, perhaps
one or two years.
Commissioner Kasolas asked what would be wrong with giving the applicant a Use
Permit for one, two, or three years?
Chairman Olszewski responded that this possibility was indeterminate - there
would have to be a parking district if it were to work at all. So, the Site
Committee had to consider that no district is forthcoming.
Chairman Olszewski opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on
this item.
Mr. Jim Eller, Attorney for Mr. Bonnett, expressed surprise at the reversal in
the recommendation. He stated that today was the first time he had heard that
it is considered unlikely that a parking district will be formed; that he had
always been under the assumption that the downtown parking ratio was 1:350
which would require them to have 8 parking spaces; and, that it is the
_4_
Commission's option to recommend different ratios. Mr. Eller continued that a
Use Permit approval would allow the City to proceed with the downtown area and
would allow time to see what will develop. This will not impose a burden on
Mr. Bonnett. There is not a significant parking problem at this site - nothing
more than what affects any other tenant on Dillon Ave. Mr. Eller spoke in
favor of approving a Conditional Use Permit for a two year period.
Chairman Olszewski stated that he has heard information that there is a parking
problem, particularly right at this property where vehicles are parking in
"nose-in" position - creating back-up problems.
Mr. Eller indicated that the current circumstances are not creating any more of
a problem; and, there have not been complaints or accidents in the area because
of this project.
Commissioner Stanton noted that the Commission has been working with this
project trying to bring it into conformance since 1977.
Mr. Eller stated that Mr. Bonnett was not the person who constructed the
buildings on the property as they exist.
Commissioner Kasolas asked Mr. Eller if, in terms of a Use Permit, he
understood that the use would only be available for a specific time frame which
would terminate. Commissioner Kasolas asked Mr. Eller if he was asking to be
treated with the same parking ratio as those on the other side of the tracks?
Commissioner Kasolas noted that he has not heard one property owner from this _
area coming forth to object to this proposal. Commissioner Kasolas asked Mr.
Eller if his client would be prepared to accept a time limit regarding the use
of the property.
Commissioner Stanton asked Staff what kind of problems exist on Dillon Ave.
Mr. Helms responded that there are several uses which have "nose-in" parking,
as well as uses which do not represent the approved site plans. This causes an
appearance of extreme parking congestion.
Commissioner Perrine reported that he saw an aerial photo which showed 14
vehicles. on this site. Many times an applicant is able to show a need for less
parking; however, this particular aerial photo shows a needs for the
recommended 12 spaces. Additionally, Commissioner Perrine noted that street
improvements at this location will result in less available parking.
Mr. Eller noted that the presented plan reduces the square footage and improves
the parking situation. If the parking ratio of 1:350 is applied, then there
will be adequate parking.
Chairman Olszewski noted for the record that the aerial photo referred to by
Commissioner Perrine was also shown, by Staff, to the rest of the Commission.
Chairman Olszewski asked that the record also show that aerials are regularly
studied by the Site and Architectural Review Committee in the recommendation
process.
Mr. Eller again noted that, if the square footage of the buildings is taken
into consideration, then the 8 parking spaces would be adequate, with a ratio
of 1:350 .
-S-
Commissioner Christ stated that there was an approved plan that had adequate
parking. Unfortunately, the owner at that time did not make the street
improvements and did not develop the site according to the approved plan.
Commissioner Christ continued that he is looking at this situation from a
standpoint of what can be done to benefit the community and to make this
situation work. He thought that the project is unique and does not detract
from the community as far as design. Perhaps a solution would be to approve
the use for a given period of time, during which time the applicant would see
that the site conformed to the originally approved plans, providing
improvements and parking. If alternative parking is made available during the
interim time period, it could be presented to the Commission at that time.
Commissioner Perrine indicated that the situation is one of the addition of an
illegal structure without an approved plan, and this does not impact the main
building.
Commissioner Kasolas noted that he observed from the aerial the number of
developments along Campbell Avenue which have large numbers of empty parking
spaces. He questioned the use of aerials for the purpose used this evening.
Commissioner Kasolas thought that since this project has come about through no
fault of the current owner - that it is important to see where equality
appears, in terms of parking. Commissioner Kasolas suggested approving the use
for one year which would then place the burden of resolving the problem on the
applicant.
Commissioner Dickson noted that the downtown area is a very serious problem
that has taken a lot of time; that the Commission has the right to adjust
parking ratios; that this project is unique; and that he would support looking
for alternative parking solutions. Commissioner Dickson felt that the one-year
approval was a good approach.
Commissioner Kasolas suggested that a Conditional Use Permit be based upon
original Staff Recommendation. This may involve a continuance in order for the
applicant to meet with Staff to determine impacts. He strongly recommended
that it be as presented on the board - then we would have a year to find out if
it worked.
Commissioner Christ stated that he thought a one-year time period would result
in the situation remaining as it is today. He thought that the property needs
to be brought into conformance; that one year was unreasonable in that he
thought it would take at least two years; that he would rather see that they
are given a time frame to bring property into conformance; and, if something
does occur with the parking, the applicant would have the opportunity to come
back to the Commission with their alternative. For these reasons, Commissioner
Christ supported the direction suggested by Commissioners Kasolas and Dickson.
Chairman Olszewski stated that based on his information from sitting on the
Site Committee and having reviewed this item countless times, there have been a
variety of alternatives offered to the applicant, including maintaining the
building on the site and turning the first story into parking. The applicant
has resisted all those alternatives; therefore, his opinion is that a decision
should be made on this matter.
-6-
Commissioner Dickson noted that this item had an ordinance in effect with a
time frame stipulated. This would mean that the application under discussion
is new since the termination of the ordinance.
Commissioner Kasolas asked the Commission if they would be supportive of a
proposal for continuance, at which time the applicant and Staff could be
directed to come back with a Conditional Use Permit for a period of two years.
Commissioner Stanton thought that the aim of the Commission should be for
conformance of the property.
Commissioner Walker indicated that the parking ratio on the other side of the
railroad tracks, which has been referred to in discussion, relates to more of a
retail situation that what is present in the Dillon area. He did not want to
see a reduction in parking get started with this property, creating a domino
effect in the neighborhood. Commissioner Walker stated that he would go along
with one more delay to provide the applicant time to investigate bringing the
site into conformance, noting that he would like to see some movement on the
applicant's part.
Commissioner Perrine felt that this was a unique situation wherein the
applicant was shown one recommendation, and now another is being presented.
M/S: Perrine, Kasolas - That M 88-20 be continued to the Planning
Commission meeting of January 24, 1989, for
Staff to look into a Conditional Use Permit
and the impacts of such a permit.
Discussion on motion
Commissioner Dickson stated that he would be in favor of approving a
Conditional Use Permit this evening; however, he would support the motion.
Commissioner Walker wanted the applicant to think that this is really going to
end.
Commissioner Christ was uncomfortable with the Staff having to provide such a
report.
Chairman Olszewski did not like
that any headway would be made.
the Zoning Ordinance, and that
adequate parking.
Vote on motion
the direction being taken and was not confident
He thought that this situation was unfair to
any other developer would be required to provide
Motion for continuance carried with the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine, Walker, Olszewski, Dickson
NOES: Commissioners: Christ, Stanton, #wr~r~
ABSENT: Commissioners: None.
-7-
Commissioner Perrine suggested that Staff might prepare the Staff Report with
their recommendation for denial and a notation that if the Commission wishes to
approve a use permit certain conditions would apply.
Commissioner Walker asked Staff to include drawings of the approved version in
the Commission's agenda packet.
Commissioner Christ noted that he is supportive of Staff's opinions and
sincerely hopes that Staff continues to support their position in that Staff's
input is critical to his decisions.
~ ~ ~
UP 88-12 Public hearing to consider the application of
Avakian, G. Mr. George Avakian for approval of a
Conditional Use Permit to allow a beer and
wine off-sale liquor license in conjunction
with a sandwich/delicatessen located on
property known as 2087 S. Winchester Blvd. in
a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District.
Acting Planning Director Phil Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of January 10,
1989, noting that Staff is recommending approval of this request.
Chairman Olszewski asked what criteria the Police Department used in reviewing
these types of applications for recommendation.
Mr. Stafford noted that Staff will come back to the Commission with this
information.
Discussion ensued regarding the location of the use, the surrounding uses, and
the hours of operation. Staff noted that the hours of sale for alcohol are
established by the Alcoholic Beverage Control; however, the Commission does
have the authority to modify those hours.
/Use per it
Commissioner Dic~son asked that Staff review the reason for the requirements of
the Additionally, he did not have information showing the other like uses
in this area, and this was necessary for him to make a decision.
Mr. Stafford indicated that Staff is of the understanding that the situation
regarding liquor sales in the immediate downtown area is significantly improved
from the time when the use permit procedure was initiated.
Chairman Olszewski expressed concern with the number of parking spaces in the
front of this building, as well as with the placement of trash containers. He
asked if there were any trash receptacles proposed and what they looked like.
Mr. Stafford responded that the applicant has not shown the location of trash
containers in his proposal. There have been conditions imposed, in the past on
other applications, relative to applicant's policing their own litter problem.
Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this
item.
-8-
M/S: Stanton, Perrine -
M/S: Stanton, Perrine -
The motion was amended to read:
Discussion
That the public hearing on UP 88-12 be
closed. Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0).
That the Planning Commission adopt. Resolution
No. 2575, including the attached findings and
conditions, approving UP 88-12.
. .approving UP 88-12, subject to the
provision of a trash can (location to be
approved by the Planning Director), and the
hours of alcohol sales be changed to 8:00
a.m. - 6:00 p.m. to coincide with the hours
of operation for the delicatessen as
indicated by the applicant.
Commissioner Christ opposed the motion because of the amendment and because of
a concern with off-sale liquor licenses. Commissioner Christ continued that he
has a real concern with people buying food and alcohol which is not being
consumed on the premises. A lot of people are consuming and drinking while
operating a vehicle and this should be discouraged. He concluded that he would
not have a problem with on-sale liquor sales.
Commissioner Kasolas opposed the motion, noting that he could not recollect
when the Commission has told someone they have to stop selling alcohol by 6:00
p.m.
Commissioner Perrine expressed concern regarding the amendment.
M/S: Perrine, Kasolas - That the motion be amended to exclude
reference to trash cans and hours of alcohol
sales.
Discussion
Chairman Olszewski was of the opinion that it was a mistake not to include a
trash receptacle, and opposed the amendment.
Vote on motion
Motion to amend to exclude trash cans and
hours carried with the following roll call
vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine, Christ, Stanton
NOES: Commissioners: Walker, Dickson, Olszewski
ABSENT: Commissioners: None.
Vote on motion
Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2575,
including findings and conditions as
indicated in Staff Report of January 10,
1989, failed with the following roll call
vote:
-9-
AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine, Stanton
NOES: Commissioners: Christ, Walker, Dickson, Olszewski
ABSENT: Commissioners: None.
Motion
M/ Kasolas, - That UP 88-12 be referred to the City Council
without recommendation. Motion failed for
lack of a second.
Motion
M/S: Stanton, Walker - That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution
No. 2575, including findings and conditions
of approval as indicated in the Staff Report
of January 10,.1989, approving UP 88-12.
Motion carried with the following roll call
vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine, Stanton, Walker
NOES: Commissioners: Christ, Dickson, Olszewski
ABSENT: Commissioners: None.
Commissioner Dickson noted that the reasons for the use permit procedure on
liquor licenses was the proliferation of these uses in the downtown area and
that the situation has changed. Commissioner Dickson asked that the Commission
send a referral to the City Council asking. them to review this procedure.
Commissioner Kasolas stated that there is a difference between off-sale and
on-sale and asked that these differences be considered. There was a concern
with the proliferation of on-sale establishments within the downtown area;
however, the applicant before the Commission this evening is for off-sale and
this has nothing to do with the downtown district. It is apparent in the last
5-6 years that considered of these applications on the Commission agenda has
not served much of a purpose but to clog the calendar. He recommended that
Staff proceed with removing this procedure from the code.
Commissioner Christ agreed wholeheartedly. Ae stated that he would also like
to see the Council address alcohol uses while driving motor vehicles,
specifically where fuel is being sold (gas stations, etc.). He asked that the
Council take a look at the issue of alcohol sales in conjunction with service
stations and convenience markets.
Commissioner Perrine suggested this as a study session topic.
Commissioner Walker noted that society itself is producing pressure against the
use of alcohol.
~ ~
-10-
PM 88-15 Public hearing to consider the application of
Lands of Hicks Mr. Jim Hicks to split an existing
residential lot to create two single family
residential lots on property known as 684
Regas Drive in an R-1-6 (Single Family
Residential) Zoning District. APN
412-35-010.
Acting Planning Director Phil Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of January 10,
1989, noting that Staff is satisfied that these two parcels can be developed
without variances.
Commissioner Kasolas recalled that one of the selling points for this
subdivision was the inclusion of this large lot, and that the Commission was
told that it was unbuildable and would provide a buffer to the properties to
the rear.
Chairman Olszewski opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on
this item.
M/S: Kasolas, Stanton - That the public hearing be closed on PM
88-15, in that no one wished to speak.
Motion carried unanimously (7-0-0). _
M/S: Kasolas, Stanton - That the Planning Commission adopt the
findings and conditions attached hereto and
approve PM 88-15. Motion carried with the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine, Christ, Stanton, Walker,
Dickson, Olszewski
NOES: Commissioners: None -
ABSENT: Commissioners: None.
~ ~ ~
MISCELLANEOUS
TS 88-10
Lands of Mayland
Tentative Subdivision Map - Lands of Mayland
- 600 W. Sunnyoaks Ave. - APN 406-08-06.
Acting Planning Director Phil Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of January 10,
1989, noting that Staff is recommending approval of this tentative map.
M/S: Kasolas, Perrine - That the Planning Commission find this
Tentative Subdivision Map in accord with the
General Plan; and, that the Planning
Commission recommend that the City Council
approve this map, subject to the attached
conditions. Motion carried 5-2-0, with
Commissioners Christ and Dickson voting no.
-11-
UP 87-17 One-year review of Planning Commission
Ghalandari, J. approval of the application of Mr. Jamal
Ghalandari for a Conditional Use Permit to
allow an off-sale liquor license in
conjunction with a grocery store on property
known as 3495 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S
(General Commercial) Zoning District.
M/S: Kasolas, Stanton - That the Planning Commission note and file
this report. Motion carried unanimously
(7-0-0).
~ ~ ~
UP 87-22 Six-month review of Planning Commission
Maj, S. approval of Ms. Susan Maj for a Use Permit to
allow the establishment of a "hobby kennel"
(3-6 dogs) on property known as 948 Crockett
Ave. in an R-1 (Single Family Residential)
Zoning District.
Acting Planning Director Phil Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of January 10,
1989, noting that Staff is recommending that the Commission schedule another
review of this matter in six months.
Commissioner Christ supported Staff's recommendation, noting that there has
been construction going on in the area which could be the reason the dogs have
been barking. In six months, the construction will be finished and the
Commission should be provided with a better idea of the situation.
Chairman Olszewski recalled testimony from residents complaining of other dogs
in the neighborhood.
M/S: Walker, Stanton - That the Planning Commission review UP 87-22
in six months (July 1989). Motion carried
unanimously (7-0-0).
* ~
Staff Report Potential topics for discussion at a Planning
Commission Study Session.
Chairman Olszewski invited the Commission to present topics for a Study
Session. These issues will be forwarded to the City Council.
Commissioner Kasolas:
What is the role of the Planning Commission in the matters that come before
it? Limited to application? What constitutes an acceptable, fair hearing?
Commissioner Dickson:
Role of Planning Commission regarding Redevelopment? Applications now go
to Redevelopment Agency first when they used to come to the Commission
first.
-12-
Chairman Olszewski:
Housing Policy - is there anything the City might be able to do regarding -_I
low and middle income, and how that relates to the Planning Commission.
Adherence to landscaping plans.
Parking ratios and developments and how that relates to what we might
consider for certain areas zoned certain ways.
Site development and common space - what can we do?
Commissioner Stanton:
Discussion regarding possible compensation for the Architectural Advisor
and the Landscape Advisor - with emphasis to get developers to pay more
attention to recommendations.
Ainsley property - home location as it relates to the Downtown Area.
Involve other committees; investigate getting some or all of trees from
current site; involve Landscape Advisor; design a park around the Ainsley
house - start now and involve the entire community.
Actively planning our community vs. reactive planning (ie. O'Connor site
across the street from Wesley Manor; the old Campbell Lumber site; getting
rid of height limitations and develop a more in-depth view of where we can
or will allow high-rise).
Need for more Study Sessions with the Council.
Press coverage to show citizens what we are doing for them.
Look at Crockett Ave. area and the entire San Tomas Area and what can be
done to improve the area.
A trend has been started on Sunnyoaks, Shelley and Redding Avenues --
should that be stopped or is it too late?
Commissioner Perrine suggested that a Study Session be scheduled soon to
provide the new Planning Director with input from the Commission.
Commissioner Kasolas suggested that a lunch or dinner be scheduled to meet the
Director and let him get to know the Commissioners.
REPORTS OF STAFF ACTIVITIES
Chairman Olszewski explained that this is a new agenda. heading to provide the
Commission with information on Staff activities.
Mr. Stafford reported that the Redevelopment Agency has scheduled a
neighborhood meeting with the Maple/Hawthorne/Page area on January 18, 1989. -.--
-13-
INFORMAL DISCUSSION
Chairman Olszewski explained that this is a new agenda heading to provide the
Commission with an opportunity to discuss items which need not be agendized or
which do not require Staff Reports.
Commissioner Stanton expressed an interest in the Ainsley House and asked what
the Commission could do to help.
Mr. Stafford noted that he has been informed that the issue will be referred to
the various Commissions once an architect has been chosen.
SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS
There were no Subcommittee Reports at this time.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting
was adjourned at 9:45 p.m.
APPROVED: Bruce Olszewski
Chairman
ATTEST: Philip J. Stafford
Acting Planning Director
RECORDED: Linda A. Dennis
Recording Secretary
RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: PM 88-15
SITE ADDRESS: 684 REGAS DR. (APN 412-35-10)
APPLICANT: J. HICKS ~
PC MTG: 1-10-89
1. The proposed parcel map is consistent with the Land Use and Housing
Elements of the General Plan.
2. The proposed parcel map is consistent with the R-1 Zoning District.
3. The area of the proposed parcels is consistent with the area of other
parcels in the existing subdivision on Regas Drive.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: PM 88-15
1. File a Parcel Map in accordance with the provisions of the State
Subdivision Map Act.
2. Pay a fee in lieu of dedication of lands of parks in the amount of
$1,132.00.
h
~ ti
~ e LJY S1 b
8 ~
.~ ~ ~ .~
~` h
J~ '' Q
I` ~
~eQ -- ~ ~•• ._.
c=s~~~ \
:~, ~ .
j••! !' ~~
0
J
~ ~~,~
r,
~~ ~ ~
a`'
..
.\
PslRCEL i4 `
o. zZ7Z ec,Q~s
•{
~~,
~~'
-•t•sx/r' ~~/
y ~.
\ e~
\ e`~
~~ i?
N75'c'~ 5Q E' SS 7A
I
(~
o
;'+y j ~ARCEG 'B "'
~~~ ~~ 1 ~ ~ I O. /~B9 .4CRE9
)~ y
~,f ~ '~; / Ali
b 0 ; a t, ~
t / h /I
~ ~~ ~~ 1
~~ ~
it
o~
6~
:r•.
:fti
~'~!
r
~ r;.
e
I~ ,
i '..i
!T
;r
~a
~~s
;ED LoT SPLIT DETAIL
i nu I Y
I ' ~ i
V' ~~
y
I ~ r ~ ~,
LL/ YY * L j
~: S
J W ~ PA~OCEL 'A' t
J ~ e.sls .ro~cr ~
~' I ~ ---r
~ ~ ~' t ,
_ _~.....:` ~q. I
\ +~ ~ «1
.:,
~ ~ ~, ~'.
I c~ ~• ~:
` N7Y•M'N~F, ff ~ t J
l ~~ `7
~], s; 8 ryrric• 4
k I
~ I
j I
y Y ~ .~
pe,~rc~c e' t
`j `I '
.~~ a ~; ~
~` I I
-- .~.~--
~y r. '
Baer
Esc
A'' ~ ~.
- - - - . ~ _._ _rr
• PM 88-15
684 REGAS DRIVE
APN 412- 5-010
•:'' ;r.
•.« ~ =~
.•, _ ~*
~ ~
/
O
e
9
a~
w
Be!T } ••'
_r
a
z
3
'~..,
i •
a
b i1~0~
R3l9
e ~~
Ct
~ f 7
e ~s
e 9 f r
~, ss~s s6~
t
1 p 1 ! 3 9 9 ~
w
.o
.`
++ J
Y \ ,
1 ~~ Coy ~
r,
O
H ..,..i
i ~6 ~
e r
1R s
w ~ J ~ 9 S
1 R , F ~
• ~ i
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: TS 88-10
SITE ADDRESS: 600 W. SUNNYOAKS AVE.
APPLICANT: MAYLAND BUILDERS, INC.
PC MTG: 1-10-89
1. Installation of a sanitary sewerage system to serve all lots within the
subdivision in conformance with the proposed plans of the County of Santa
Clara Sanitation District No. 4. Sanitary sewerage service to be provided
by said District No. 4.
2. Installation of a water distribution system to serve all lots within the
subdivision in conformance with the plans of the San Jose Water Works.
Water service to be provided by said water company. Fire hydrants and
appurtenances shall be provided and installed at the locations specified by
the Fire Chief, Fire Department, City of Campbell. Fire hydrant
maintenance fees shall be paid to City at the rate of $195 per fire
hydrant.
3. Subdivider shall create or provide any public service easement and any
other public utility and/or public service easements as may be necessary
for the installation of any and all public utilities and/or facilities.
4. Compliance with the provisions of Title 20, Subdivisions of the Campbell
Municipal Code.
5. Subdivider to pay Storm Drainage Area Fee.
6. Subdivider to furnish copy of Preliminary Title Report.
7. CC&R's to be approved by City Engineer to insure provisions for maintenance
of buildings and common area.
8. Provide a grading and drainage plan for the review and approval of the City
Engineer. -
9. Obtain an excavation permit and pay fees and deposit for all work in the
public right-of-way.
10. Pay a fee of 6 792.00 in lieu of dedication of land for parks.
Q
0
J
h
3
0
0
3ntr 1 s~dO.cNNns ivt
~~-o~.~./ba~v~~ ~3' ~OZ'~zL~~
iD'fLL 7L ~/OM ~P ~S
sue.
~ ~ ~
o~
0
Q
aC
~~
O
h
h
~
a.
a o ' ~iE
-
r
.y
.K.
6 ii' f-N ~•~
'
~, ,~ o,
,M ~
~^ a
o
ssz,-'~ ~--- N
~
~~%
' ~ Q
~ h
~fi
O
~
~~
ll
V
~ . I ~
4
/
,~ W ~
N
~ `L ~ v
w.
~
0
" la `or
o Q ' ~ o ~
'yy
1f' ~+
'1 ~Q,
jy'~"'
~
r
(~ 1i
"m""~yaraws ,
'y
ZS O 1
J T ~
' ~',
V . or
h 0 O
F `
`
~ ~
~
O ,~/y~
~ _'V Qc MC
s
~
D
E Q
C
p !t
j
O
y
a z oz c I
.` ~
tr
N ~ ~ N
` \;.'
q~-~ ~ O ~
_
08 c
OM/~7$'
~,•~E.
~ ~\~N
s~y:~
»: _
g~+t.. v ~(W E
`G ;9 4
m ~ m 4 ~
Y
_•
•
~ ^
7
~ 4 u i
8 ~ ~ M O
O w ~
d r^ ~ ~' ..; 9 s
." a ~y
y ^^ 1 y••y
l E N N 9~ p
N yy
~ Y:U H ti p Y
0 0 ~ N n0
•~ •YY Y
0
~
~
C
C
H i r
y
~
«
~~ ~ SO Q~5'
M
/
~MM
OiU Sri A `
rr y~
~
~ ~
~ i
«
.
M
w~
a ~;a .;.,.~... ot~ .
Y
O }
~y
ri~ a~
T+
, Q
ire i ^
~
9
r •V f
~ Ft wa 77` ~N~3 c°i ~ r ~
Y i ~w sa0 ~'iiS•i ~~i ~.. a
ooo ~0 M
O$
~
• ~~• • q `
r
~
~
~~~ v o C~ Yu ,V• M
..:
~s=^~:YB~ ~ ~
O
r
~
o~
g p
AA
s a 2 ~~~~ "~s a
Y
°• :~ :
rv ., .ru ••
m ao ° \
~
M
o
i i o
.~.
~ ~ O. y
~~ ~ ~ ~
e
0
eo Dr.
tO i w y
• Connl•
s
' ~
_ Ate. _
- - s
-i
~[:-I___
::
Plole Ploso
// ,~~
- _1._ e..
`` i
To r ~ i
Plo:o
--
•
„ .. ~ - --
~• -
i
~INae _ Seott C/.
L
r.
O • Ct.
.J N ROe
O
to
i
O
lo4r• Dr.
V ~
w I ~_
E r
s
•
~ C1. GI•
_ i tt
0
Z c. -
o
.y ~ I ha • c_
a Ct. o
~ o e
N N •
_ ~
~~~
~k
a ~I~. I I I I isa•
Z
t9 -- --
~ ~Ci
~ ~ ~r -
- ~o ~~ r~ ZiC 88-07 L11.
r ~ ~ v Lj~ pD 88-11
Fetrloee' 600 W SUNNYOAKS AVE.
_ ~ APN 406-08-06
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
evF HACIENDA AVE
_L 1~