Loading...
PC Min 12/13/1988PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA 7:30 P.M. MINUTES DECEMBER 13, 1988 The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular session in the City Hall Council Chambers, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. ROLL CALL Present Commissioners George Kasolas, Robert Stanton, Jay Perrine, Bruce Olszewski, James Walker, Ron Christ; Planning Director Art Kee, Principal Planner Phil Stafford, Planner II Tim Haley, Engineering Manager Bill Helms, City Attorney Bill Seligmann, Recording Secretary Linda Dennis. Absent Commissioner Dickson. Chairman Christ noted that Commissioner Dickson's absence is excused for personal reasons. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/S: Stanton, Perrine That the minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of November 22, 1988, be approved as submitted. Motion carried 5-0-1-1, with Commissioner Kasolas abstaining due to absence from the November 22 meeting. COMMUNICATIONS Principal Planner Phil Stafford noted that communications received pertained to specific items on the agenda. ORAL REQUESTS Chairman Christ invited anyone in the audience to address the Commission on issues not agendized. There being no one, the Chairman proceeded with the set agenda. PRESENTATIONS Chairman Christ, on behalf of the Commission, presented Planning Director Kee with a Certification of Appreciation in honor of his retirement from public service. PUBLIC HEARINGS S 88-18 Continued public hearing to consider the Shen, E. application of Mr. Eddy Shen, on behalf of LRS Associates, for approval of a site and architectural application to allow the construction of a retail building on property known as 2347 S. Winchester Boulevard, in C-Z-S General Commercial) Zoning District. -z- Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of December 13, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval of this application. Additionally, Mr. Stafford provided detailed information regarding the ingress/egress for this project. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this .item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. Discussion included the architectural elements, the future remodeling of the shopping center, and access of this building to the rest of the shopping center. The Committee is recommending approval of this application. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. M/S: Olszewski, Stanton - That the public hearing on S 88-18 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). M/S: Perrine, Olszewski - That the Planning Commission accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared for this project; and, that the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and conditions and approve S 88-18 with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Perrine, Olszewski, Walker, Christ NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Dickson. ~ ~ ~ M 88-20 Continued public hearing to consider the Bonnett, R. application of Mr. Robert Bonnett for approval of a modification to a previously approved Planned Development Permit to allow a revised parking plan on property known as 145 Dillon Avenue, in a PD (Planned Development/Industrial) Zoning District. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of December 13, 1988, noting that Staff recommended denial. The Site and Architectural Review Committee had considerable discussion concerning the parking issue; therefore, Staff and the Committee are recommending a continuance to January 10, 1989, to allow the applicant an opportunity to explore the parking situation further. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was discussed at length by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. Discussion at the Committee meeting involved the number of parking spaces that would be created, including the alternative of converting two. existing garages to parking spaces which would still result in less spaces than necessary for this development. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. -3- M/S: Walker, Olszewski - That the public hearing on M 88-20 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of January 10, 1989. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). ~ ~ ~ S 88-19 Public hearing to consider the application of Pefferle, D. Mr. Dana Pefferle for approval of a site and architectural application to allow the construction of a 2-1/2 story office building on property known as 201 E. Hamilton Avenue, in a C-1-S (Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning District. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of December 13, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval of this application. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was before the Site and Architectural Review Committee and that the Committee recommended approval, subject to revised plans which address a modification to the elevator tower to create a continuous roof eave line. Chairman Christ expressed a concern about tables and umbrellas creating a cluttered appearance on the second floor patio area. Commissioner Kasolas requested clarification on the method of calculation used to determine the parking ratio. Mr. Stafford reviewed the parking ratio calculations. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. M/S: Walker, Stanton - That the public hearing on S 88-19 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). Discussion ensued regarding placing conditions on the placement of umbrellas on the second floor patio area. M/S: Olszewski, Stanton - That the Planning Commission accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared for this application; and, that the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and conditions, and approve S 88-19 with the added conditions (1) that revised plans reflecting the relocation of the elevator tower be submitted, and (2) that no element (ie. umbrellas) be allowed in the patio area which are higher than the existing screening without approval of the Planning Director. -4- Discussion on motion Commissioner Walker stated that he would be voting for approval with reservations relative to the non-contemporary design of the proposed building, _ although it matches the adjacent building, Commissioner Walker indicated that he is opposed to creating "dated" entryway into the City. Vote on motion Motion carried with the following roll cal l vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Perrine, Olszewski, Walker, Christ NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Dickson. ~r .. ~ S 88-20 Public hearing to consider the application of Anderson, K. Mr. Kurt Anderson, on behalf of Barry Swenson Builder, for approval of a 2-1/2 story medical office building of approximately 32,000 sq.ft. on properties known as 14409 and 14391 S. Bascom Avenue, (Campbell address: 3803 S. Bascom) in a P-0 _ (Professional Office) Zoning District. Planner II Tim Haley reviewed the Staff Report of December 13, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval of this project at this time. Engineering Manager Bill Helms noted that Staff has received the requested traffic report and is satisfied that this proposal has no more impact than the previous proposal, under which it had been determined that there were no mitigations necessary. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was discussed by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee was of the opinion that this building will be a positive architectural statement to the community; therefore, approval is being recommended. Commissioner Kasolas noted that he was under the impression that there was an EIR requirement for a building of this size. Mr. Helms indicated that there is a policy which addresses the need for an EIR if the critical movement changes the level of service more than one percent. However, Staff has determined that this project will not affect the level of service more than one percent. Commissioner Walker asked if one driveway would be sufficient for the amount of parking provided. ____. Mr. Helms noted that Staff has reviewed the plans and is of the opinion that !, one driveway will adequately serve the project's needs. -5- Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. Mr. Kurt Anderson, Architect, reviewed the project, presented a rendering and noted that the developers were in agreement with the conditions indicated in the Staff Report. Dr. Laurence Berkowitz, Developer, explained that the medical group will be providing dermatology and plastic surgeon services which address diseases of the skin and aging. Mr. Richard Florence, 1171 Holmes Avenue, Whiteoaks Manor Homeowner's Association, submitted letters from Dr. Berkowitz and Barry Swenson, Builders, stating that the applicants had met with the homeowners to develop a project that addresses the needs of the neighborhood. Mr. Florence noted that the neighborhood is encouraging approval of this project. Ms. Ruth Goldstein, 6514 Gillis Drive, San Jose, Property Manager, 3880 S. Bascom Avenue, expressed concern relative to inadequate parking ratios should this facility be converted into regular office use, and aesthetics of the building. Ms. Goldstein noted that the surrounding architecture is predominantly California ranch style. Mr. Stafford explained that the application is for a medical office building, and as such, the approval will be for a medical use. Further, that the provided parking is 11 spaces more than is required by the ordinance. Mr. Anderson explained that the practice is anticipating 12-13 doctors which would provide appropriate space for each doctor, and that 18 doctors would be the maximum number allowable. M/S: Perrine, Walker - That the public hearing on S 88-20 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). M/S: Perrine, Stanton - That the Planning Commission accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared for this project; and, that the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and conditions and approve S 88-20. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Perrine, Olszewski, Walker, Christ NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Dickson. ~ ~ ~ S 88-21 Public hearing to consider the application of Anderson, K. Mr. Kurt Anderson, on behalf of L. D. Coffey Construction, for a site and architectural application to allow the construction of 12 single family homes on the properties known as 710 & 722 Budd Avenue, in an R-1-6 (Single Family Residential/Low Density) Zoning District. -6- Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of December 13, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval of this project. - Commissioner Olszewski reported that this .item was discussed by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee recommended approval as redlined; additionally, retention of a group of pine trees at the end of the cul-de-sac was recommended. Commissioner Perrine asked if this development fits the R-1 Zoning, and if the design is compatible with the surrounding area. Mr. Stafford responded that each lot meets the R-1 Zoning; there are no exceptions being requested; and, the surrounding neighborhood is primarily single family, single story, residential development with an R-1-6 Zoning. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited comment on this item. Mr. Kurt Anderson, Architect, reviewed the project, noting that almost all single family developments are being designed as two-story; and, the developer has tried to be sensitive in interfacing with the neighborhood by minimizing windows and maximizing setbacks to reduce invasion of privacy. The builder also feels that he can accommodate a shift in the street as requested by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. Mr. Robert Christman, 773 Jeffrey Avenue, expressed concern with the two-story design, indicating that all the other homes in the area are single story; that the presented designs do not conform with that existing in the neighborhood; that the proposed cedar shake roofing is afire hazard and the existing homes ~~ have composite roofs; that the existing fencing presents a problem with many different styles and levels; that the number of people living in the larger homes will bring more traffic to the area; and, that the larger homes will create a problem with drainage and sewers. Mr. Christman thought than an EIR should be prepared for the development. Mr. Kevin Christman, 773 Jeffrey Avenue, expressed concerns about the sizes of the proposed homes; that the selling price of the new homes do not compare to the existing homes; and, that the greater number of people living in the homes are creating traffic problems and noise problems. He suggested that the new homes be made to look more like the existing area; and, noted that he had been assured that there would only be two homes with second stories. Additionally, Mr. Christman requested, on behalf of a neighbor, that the rear windows be raised to 2 foot windows to retain the neighbors pool privacy. Mr. Anderson stated that the development conforms to all City standards; that there is an increased landscape buffer; and that the buildings' footprints have been minimized on the site. Additionally, the developer would be willing to plant trees along the interfacing properties to add to the buffer. Mr. Don Coffey, Developer and Property Owner, stated that he was not sure what he would be doing with the various rear-yard fences at this time; however, he usually contacts the adjacent property owners to see what they wish to do. ____ Planner II Haley indicated that fencing is not necessarily required for single family lots; however, the Commission has required fencing on Planned Development projects. Normally issues relating to single family homes do not have to come before the Commission. -~- M/S: Stanton, Walker - That the public hearing on S 88-21 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). M/S: Stanton, Walker - That the Planning Commission accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared for this project; and, that the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and conditions, and approve S 88-21 subject to redlining of the presented plans and Condition 3 to indicate that fencing and landscaping plans to be approved by the Planning Director. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Perrine, Olszewski, Walker, Christ NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Dickson. ~ ~ ~ The Commission recessed at 9:05 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 9:20 p.m. ~ ~ UP 88-11 Public hearing to consider the application of Ghalandari, J. Mr. Jamal Ghalandari, on behalf of California Food Market, for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow a general off-sale liquor license in conjunction with a grocery store located on property known as 100 W. Hamilton Avenue, in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of December 13, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval of this request. Mr. Stafford noted correspondence in opposition to this use (attached hereto) from the following: Nick Nichols, O'Connor Hospital at Campbell, Campbell U-Save Liquors (& other signatures) Stephen Isied, and the First United Methodist Church. Commissioner Olszewski asked if there was another liquor store less .than 400 feet from the subject site; and, if there appeared to be a concentration of liquor sales in this area. Mr. Stafford indicated that there was not necessarily a concentration of liquor sales in this area, citing as an example the intersection of San Tomas Aquino Road and Campbell Avenue where liquor is sold by Longs, Alpha Beta, Nob Hill, and various liquor stores. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. Mr. Hans Werner, 150 W. Hamilton Ave., expressed concern with the proposed hours of operation because of the immediate vicinity of bedrooms adjacent to the site. Mr. Werner indicated that he has no objection to the sale of alcohol -8- at this location, only the hours of operation. Additionally, Mr. Werner requested that the curbing on Dunster Dr. remain painted red to restrict parking, thereby allowing his tenants relief from the noise. Mr. Reza Serraf, Co-owner, California Food Mart, stated that the store has no intention of selling only liquor. The store is a full service grocery store, with liquor sales being a complementary item which is kept locked up behind the counter. The hours of liquor sales are controlled by the Alcoholic Beverage Control; less-than 107 of the store area is devoted to liquor; the store is also planning to sell delicatessen items and carries a more upscale product line than 7-11. Mr. Serraf stressed that the store's emphasis is on groceries - not liquor. Commissioner Stanton expressed a concern about the delivery time for the store, noting that evening deliveries would be disturbing to the neighborhood. Mr. Serraf indicated that the deliveries are done mostly during the day, two or three times a week. Mr. Jamal Ghalandari, Applicant, stressed that the grocery store was an upscale use; that they would not have a pay phone in order to limit loitering; and, that they would eventually sell lottery tickets. Additionally., Mr. Ghalandari indicated that the store has only two employees present. at any one time. M/S: Kasolas, Perrine - That the public hearing on UP 88-11 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (6-0-1). Discussion Commissioner Walker asked if the hours of operation could be limited in consideration of the neighborhood, noting his concern with possible noise and pedestrian safety if people try to cross Hamilton Ave. illegally. Commissioner Walker indicated that his concern was not the 24-hour operation, but rather the alcohol sales. Mr. Stafford responded that the permit can be reviewed if there is a problem, or a condition for review could be attached. From Staff's perspective, it is difficult to limit the hours for operation of the grocery store unless very specific findings are made relative to all the stores in the City which operate 24 hours a day. Commissioner Kasolas noted that if this use did not include liquor sales, it would not be before the Commission. Commissioner Perrine stated that he would be voting in favor of this application. He noted his appreciation for the communications from the hospital and the church; however, in all fairness, this use is oriented toward Hamilton Avenue, and although liquor is not the main focus limiting the sell liquor would place this business at a disadvantage. M/S: Stanton, Perrine - That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2570, including findings and conditions as indicated in the Staff Report of December 13, 1988, approving UP 88-11. -9- Discussion Commissioner Walker suggeste<3 the motion be amended to include a one-year review. Commissioner Stanton opposed the amendment. Commissioner Olszewski indicated that this application might be different from others because of the number of letters that were received in opposition. It might send a positive message to the community that the Commission is aware of the concerns and will be monitoring the situation if a review is imposed. Chairman Christ opposed the motion's approval, noting that he is opposed to liquor sales in a residential neighborhood. He continued that Commissioner Dickson had expressed strong concerns to the Chairman about this application, and would have liked to participate in the discussion; however, Commissioner Dickson could not be present this evening. Vote on motion Motion for approval carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: Kasolas, Stanton, Perrine, Olszewski, Walker Christ Dickson. ~ ~ ~ MISCELLANEOUS R 88-05 Request for reinstatement of previously S 87-02 approved site and architectural application Shepardson, R. allowing construction of an addition to an office building on property known as 137 E. Hamilton Avenue, in a C-1-S (Neighborhood Commercial) Zoning District. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of December 13, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval of this reinstatement request. Discussion. ensued regarding the fencing. It was the consensus of the Commission and Staff that there would be a concrete or masonry wall and tree wells along the rear property line. M/S: Perrine, Olszewski - That the Planning Commission find that the development standards and General Plan have not changed for this area since the previous Planning Commission approval, and that the Commission reinstate its approval of S 87-02, for a one-year period subject to the previous conditions of approval. Motion carried 5-1-1, with Commissioner Walker voting no, and Commissioner Dickson being absent. ~ * ~ -10- Election of Officers Nominations and Election of Planning. Commission Officers for 1989. M/S: Perrine, Kasolas - That the Planning Commission elect Commission Olszewski as Chairman and Commissioner Stanton as Vice-Chairman for 1989. Motion carried unanimously. Commissioner Stanton will serve as Chairman of the Site and Architectural Review Committee, with Commissioner Walker as the second member of the Committee. .~. ,~ ~. Commissioner Kasolas left the .Chambers at 10:10 p.m. ~Y x :Y PUBLIC HEARINGS TA 88-05 Continued public hearing to consider possible City-initiated amendments to Chapter 21.50 (Parking) of the Campbell Municipal Code as it pertains to residential parking requirements. Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of December 13, 1988, noting that the presented Exhibit A-1 reflects the changes requested by the Commission. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. No one wished to speak. M/S: Perrine, Stanton - That the public hearing on TA 88-05 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). M/S: Perrine, Stanton - That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2571, incorporating findings indicated in the Staff Report of December 13, 1988, recommending that the City Council approve the amendments to the Zoning Ordinance as indicated in Exhibit A-1 of the Staff Report. Discussion Commissioner Walker noted that he had understood that the Council wanted more stringent regulations. Chairman Christ indicated that this is a recommendation only. He thought that the proposal would make the City's needs for parking clearer to developers. Commissioner Olszewski commented that what is being proposed in Exhibit A-1 presently exists in the code and that this represents no change of what is currently in place. Further he stated that it is his opinion that this is appropriate since requiring more parking could tend to force developers to build up or to eliminate. landscaping which would result in ~rr~zrrcr~eEii~rl~rt of l~nei--3edi.~eat~drtrrt~atrt.~vmairile. He added that he thought more parking ...result in either (1) building up, or (2) eliminate landscaping, both which would result in an inordinate amount of land dedicated to the automobile." (Corrected at PC Mtg: 1-10-89) -11- would increase the housing costs and create a negative situation. Commissioner Olszewski concluded that he would support this amendment since it provides, clarity for developers. Commissioner Walker noted that property prices are going to be high in this _ area anyway; he would like to see quality development; and, that restricting parking can provide better looking neighborhoods and would keep parking off the street. He would like to see developers feel that they can get their price by designing nicer developments even if they have to provide more .parking. Commissioner Walker noted that he would like to see 1 guest-space required for every 2 bedrooms. Commissioner Perrine stated that passage of this amendment would result in Campbell being one of the most restrictive communities in the area--even more so than Los Gatos. Chairman Christ thought that the wording "or other restrictions" should be added (ie., if there is an apartment house across the street built 30 years ago that does not have adequate on-site parking). Commissioner Walker suggested that the wording be amended to read "or other types of restrictions." Commissioner Perrine thought that this wording was too general and would create problems. Commissioner Olszewski asked the makers of the motion to accept the following amendment: M/ Olszewski - That the proposed amendment be re-worded to read "...the width by more than 2 times, or other types of parking restrictions or street parking impacted areas... Commissioners Perrine and Stanton did not accept the proposed amendment to their motion. Vote on motion Motion for adoption of Resolution recommending approval of Exhibit A-1 (attached hereto), without amendment, carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Stanton, Perrine, Olszewski, Christ NOES: Commissioners: Walker ABSENT: Commissioners: Kasolas, Dickson. ~ ~ ~ TA 88-07 Public hearing to consider City-initiated City-initiated amendment to Chapter 21.08.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code as it pertains to requiring approval of adjacent property owners for residential additions. -12- Principal Planner Stafford reviewed the Staff Report of December 13, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval of this amendment. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. Commissioner Olszewski asked if the current situation limited the Commission's ability to make a reasonable determination if another neighbor objects. Commissioner Walker stated that he always appreciates the input of the neighbors. M/S: Stanton, Perrine - AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared for the Text Amendment; and, that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2572 recommending that the City Council delete the requirement for adjacent property owners' consent in approvals of modifications to sideyard setbacks. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: Stanton, Perrine, Olszewski, Walker, Christ None Kasolas, Dickson. X •k sc MISCELLANEOUS M 88-27 Request to modify previously approved Planned PD 87-13 Development Permit for property known as 65 D'Amico, A. Shelley Avenue, in a PD (Planned Development/ Low-Medium Density Residential) Zoning District. Planner II Haley reviewed the Staff Report of December 13, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending denial of this request. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. In the Committee's opinion, the subject tree is not to close to the building - the building is too close to the tree. The applicant needed to address the problem earlier,. necessitating architectural changes to keep the tree. Denial is recommended for the request to replace the tree. Commissioner Olszewski added that the purpose of the Tree Preservation Committee was to prevent this type of situation. Regarding the roofing material change, denial is recommended because this development is a PD. The Committee did tell the applicant that if they can provide some photographic evidence of other developments on Shelley Ave. with composition roof material, the request for change may be reconsidered. Lastly, regarding the change in driveway paving, denial is recommended. This site was intensely developed and pavement was added as an aesthetic element. treatment -13- M/S: Perrine, Stanton - That the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and deny M 88-27/PD 87-13 for reasons indicated by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). ~ ~ Request Request that a skateboard ramp be an allowed Ward, K. use in an R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District. Planner II Haley reviewed the Staff Report of December 13, 1988. Staff is of the opinion that a skateboard ramp is ,similar to other recreational structures such as swimming pools and swing sets which are incidental to residential uses. Consequently, Staff would recommend that a skateboard ramp be considered as an accessory structure. If the Commission concurs with this opinion, Staff would recommend that the Planning Commission make a determination that a skateboard ramp is a permitted use in the R-1 Zoning District without a Use Permit. In the past, skateboard ramps have been the origin of a number of complaints from adjacent property owners, due to their visibility and associated noise. If the Commission deems it necessary, it may classify this use subject to approval of a Use Permit. A Conditional Use Permit procedure would give the Planning Commission a more significant control over such structures and would require a public hearing. Commissioner Olszewski asked if allowing this type of use would put liability on the City. City Attorney Seligmann indicated that this would not imply liability. Commissioner Stanton asked what control the City might have over the construction of skateboard ramps. Mr. Haley indicated that if the ramps are in the public right-of-way, the City can take appropriate action. However, this situation occurs in someone's back yard and the noise becomes an issue with neighbors. The Commission may wish to add other findings which address the noise problems. Commissioner Olszewski noted that this use would be no different than a spa. Chairman Christ stated that he would feel comfortable only with a use permit procedure so that the Commission can see what the ramp will look like and how it would affect the neighbors. Commissioner Olszewski stated that he could not support a use permit requirement with an application fee of $400. Mr. Haley noted that the Commission may recommend to the City Council that the application fee be a lesser amount than $400. M/S: Perrine, Stanton - That the Planning Commission adopt the following findings, and adopt Resolution No. 2573, permitting a skateboard ramp as an allowed accessory use in an R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District with -14- approval of a Conditional Use Permit; and, that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adjust the application fee for this use. Findings: (1) A skateboard ramp is similar to other incidental recreational uses for single family residential uses such as swimming pools and swing sets. (2) Skateboard ramp structures are similar to other accessory buildings permitted in residential zoning districts and should meet the development standards of such structures. (3) Allowing a skateboard ramp as an accessory structure in R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District will not be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort, or general welfare of persons residing in residential neighborhoods. (4) A Conditional Use Permit is needed due to the possible impact of noise on neighbors. (5) The following restrictions would apply: (A) The building or structure could not exceed 14 feet in height (or a single story). (B) The structure shall not be less than 10 feet from the rear of the main building located on the same lot. (C) When located at the side of a main building, the structure shall not be less than 5 feet from the main building. (D) The structure shall meet all setback requirements as specified in Chapter 21.55. (E) Not more than one accessory structure shall exceed 200 sq.ft. in area. No accessory structure shall exceed a maximum size of 1,000 sq.ft. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). XX St -15- UP 88-05 Six-month review of Planning Commission Moose Lodge approval of Use Permit allowing establishment of Loyal Order of Moose Lodge 41996 on property known as 471 Division Street, in a CM (Controlled Manufacturing) Zoning District, as it pertains to parking. Principal Planner Stafford reported that a condition of this approval was a six-month review to insure adequate parking for this use. However, since its approval, this project has not commenced. Consequently, Staff is recommending that the Commission note and file this report. It was the consensus of the Commission to note and file this report. ~ ~ SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS Subcommittee Site & Architectural Review Procedure Subcommittee; Tree Preservation Committee; Site & Architectural Review Committee; Dover School Uses Subcommittee. There were no Subcommittee Reports at this time. * ~ ~ ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:50 p.m. APPROVED: Ronald W. Christ Chairman ATTEST: Philip J. Stafford Acting Secretary RECORDED: Linda A. Dennis Recording Secretary RECONAiENDED FINDINGS : S 88-18 SITE ADDRESS: 2347 S. WINCHESTER BLVD. APPLICANT: LRS ASSOCIATES PC MTG: 12-13-88 1. The proposed project is an appropriate scale in relationship to the adjacent developed uses. 2. The building design is considered acceptable and interesting by the Architectural Advisor. 3. The parking provided meets the code requirement of 1:200. 4. The project is designed to minimize infringement on neighboring properties. 5. Substantial landscaping has been provided which adds to the aesthetics of the project. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE ~~ S 88-18 SITE ADDRESS: 2347 S. WINCHESTER BLVD. APPLICANT: LRS ASSOCIATES PC MTG DATE: 12-13-88 The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of -- the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. 1. Revised elevations plan indicating upgraded street elevations to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor prior to application for a building permit. 2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 3. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $5,000.00 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to application for a building permit. 5. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if boxes are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director. 6. All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. 7. Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are installed. 8. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. 9. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Gode. 10. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE 46 S 88-18 SITE ADDRESS: 2347 S. WINCHESTER BLVD. APPLICANT: LRS ASSOCIATES Pg. 2 11. Ordinance No. 7.82 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. 12. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 13. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 14. File and process a parcel map to create the new lots. 15. Obtain an excavation permit, pay fees, and post surety to modify driveways and sidewalks., as required by Director of Public Works. `--~ 16. Submit grading and drainage plan for approval by City Engineer. BUILDING DIVISION 17. Walls on exterior less than 20' to property line to be one hour construction. 18. Openings in exterior walls less than 20' shall be protected. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 19. Applicant to provide evidence of mutual access easements for use of parking area prior to issuance of building permits. FIRE DEPARTMENT 20. The Fire Department will be proposing an automatic fire sprinkler requirement for buildings 5,000 sq.ft. or greater. If the new requirement is adopted by Council prior to the issuance of a building permit for this project, the requirement will apply. The sprinkler requirement may be in effect after January 1989. • ~~~ t ~ J Q • ta: ~~~ t ~ l r, /"~ 9 . 9 ,1 1 V a ~f,0 ~~ y J~~~ Ceteloe r ~ J 1 i . ~1 ~ I / 9 ~ ! • ~ E t f J V 1 M M ' N Senferd Ave -~ D c ~ + i ~' ... ~ ' s e u L~ 1 J •~ ; r RECOMMENDED FINDINGS: S 88-19 SITE ADDRESS: 201 E. HAMILTON AVE. APPLICANT: D. PEFFERLE PC MTG: 12-13-88 1. The proposed project is an appropriate scale in relationship to the adjacent developed uses. 2. The project is well designed and architecturally blends into the neighborhood. 3. The parking provided at 1:225 for leasable office space is considered adequate for this office use. 4. The project is designed to minimize infringement on neighboring properties. 5. Substantial landscaping has been provided which adds to the aesthetics of the project. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE # S 88-19 SITE ADDRESS: 201 E. HAMILTON AVE. APPLICANT: D. PEFFERLE PC MTG DATE: 12-13-88 The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that he/she is ~__. required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. 1. Revised elevations indicating revised stairway design to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor prior to application for a building permit. 2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 3. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be .submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of a building permit. ~ 5. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of ____ $5,000.00 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to application for a building permit. 6. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if boxes are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director. 7. Applicant to submit a letter to the Planning Department, satisfactory to the City Attorney, prior to application for building permit, limiting the use of the property as follows: 6,324 sq.ft. leasable office space and lunch room and lobby. 8. All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. 9. Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are installed. 10. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. 11. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE ~l S 88-19 SITE ADDRESS: 201 E. HAMILTON AVE. APPLICANT: D. PEFFERLE PAGE 2. 12. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan .check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. 13. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by Planning and Building Departments (Section 21.53 of the Campbell Municipal Code). 14. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. 15. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 16. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. 17. The applicant is hereby notified that the property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures shall be secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed from the property. Sect. 11.201 & 11.414, 1979 Ed. Uniform Fire Code. BUILDING DEPARTMENT I8. Retaining walls at property lines are limited to a height of 15 inches if constructed of wood. 19. Office: B2 - One hour fire rated walls less than 20'0" to property Iine. Garage: B1 - One hour fire rated wall between B1 & B2, and one hour protection to property line. Lunchroom to have 2 exits. Elevators and exit onto roof not acceptable. FIRE DEPARTMENT 20. An approved fire sprinkler system complying with NFPA Standard 4113 shall be provided for the entire structure including all overhangs, canopies, and trash enclosures within 10' of the building. Uniform Fire Code 10.308(a). 21. Three story B-2 occupancies shall be of 1-hour constructions. 3rd story lunchroom/roof deck area may be classified as an A-3 occupancy requiring Type I or Type II fire rated construction. UBC Table 5-D. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE ~~ S 88-19 SITE ADDRESS: 201 E. HAMILTON AVE. APPLICANT: D. PEFFERLE PAGE 3. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 22. Obtain an excavation permit, pay fees, and post surety to relocate driveway and electrolier and any other work in the public right-of-way as directed by the City Engineer. 23. Provide on-site grading and drainage plan for approval by the City Engineer.- 24. If arrows marked on driveway, drawing is incorrect. Correction noted in red. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 25. Applicant to provide evidence of mutual access easements for ingress/egress to adjacent property, prior to issuance of building permits. PLANNING COMMISSION 26. Any additions or elements (ie patio furniture/umbrellas) which affect the roof line or may create a cluttered appearance on the patio element on the second floor must be approved by the Planning Director. . i vn v ~a a r+ SO N R AVE. ltJ Q ~- R. LAURENCE BERKOWITZ, nn. o. A PROfESSIONAI CORPORATION DIPLOMATE AMERICAN BOARD OF PLASTIC SURGERY December 7, 1988 White Oaks Manor Neighborhood Watch Association C/O Rudolph Herz 1888 White Oaks Road Campbell, California 95008 Dear Mr. Herz: I enjoyed speaking with you this evening regarding our proposed project for Bascom Avenue to construct a 32,000 square foot medical arts building in conjunction with the developer Mr. Barry Swenson. I am writing this letter to reaffirm our intentions to be good neighbors and treat, in good faith, the agreements which you have made with our architect, Mr. Kurt Anterson. Specifically, you have asked for the following: 1. A 20 foot dedicated green space between the building and the neighbor property. A 40 foot area is also being provided at the rear corner of the parking area as a buffer zone between the neighbors and our building. 2. There will be no windows or deck above the first floor on the rear of the building. We have shown you our intention to provide a green house window on the second floor and would begin 6 feet above floor level and angle 45 degrees. 3. There would be secure parking after working hours which would be insured by a security gate at the only entrance/ exit. 4. There are two houses that have been zoned R-1 behind our property. This property will be developed by Barry Swenson. and is not controlled by our group, but we support your request that the two residential homes be constructed concurrently with the construction of our medical building. 5. There will be an 8 foot solid fence surrounding the perimeter of our property. 6. All exterior planting will be located and planted to minimize noise and visual impact. There will be no light fixtures over 8 feet as the height of the wall will be 8 feet. 15100 LOS GATOS BOULEVARD, SUITE 4 LOS GATOS, CALIFORNIA 95030 TELEPHONE f40B3 356-D411 -2- 7. We intend to plant mature trees in the dedicated green space area, all of which will be greater. than 8 feet intended to be a sufficient visual barrier and that will grow within a reasonable period of time. 8. The dumpster, which you have asked to be a minimum of 100 feet from our property line will, in fact, be located at the front of our property at the Bascom Avenue entrance. I hope that this information meets all of your requirements. We look forward to being good neighbors and we are very appreciative of your support on Tuesday night before the Campbell Planning Commission. ~~ .. Res tively yours, R Laurence-Berkowitz, anaging P~rtner Profession~,i Building R.LB/sh ;~ M. D. Asso iation ,~ ~ -`~~ I /.;y i ~ ~'~~. o LQ G°Q G°3 '~ ~ MI C~ fill ~ O f~l B U I L D'E R 7C. i tJD~:I .~T =TF< _-~T SUITE 2O~' S~•,r~' ~~G~=~. Cam. _ i i2 i_. .-. - _ _ ~ ' 1aR•0' 'a «4Jr-~, ~. wYr F..~.... ,~, ..~ .~. -..rte ~ L_ .. .. - - -•- ~'s :...._ Y..u ..._. ...w"~ ~ r: _~ra.s.~.L~:.~` ,,.. <„~~ti•..;~;,~' ~s`~~`~~c..~:.~..~:~i~r:..~so. _,~t,~~._ ..... , c:.-~ . . ._. .-_ - .. ._ December 9, 1988 Rudulph Herz do Homeowners WHITEOAKS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION 1888 Whiteoaks Blvd. Campbell, CA 95008 To Whom This May Concern: I am writing this letter to address the concerns of the Homeowners Association as discussed at our meeting on December 6, 1988, and our subsequent telephone conversations. As developer of this project, I am aware of the anxieties of the group and I am completely empathetic with your position. Having developed over 2 million square feet of property, we understand that once we've completed the building project, it must remain as an asset to the local community. It is with this in mind that we offer the following: 1. Two, two-story single family detached homes (similiar to the Pinn Brother Development) will be constructed concurrently with the medical building, 2. Landscaping in front of the aforementioned homes will be completed with the construction of said homes. 3. Twelve foot high trees will be planted along the back boundry of the commercial project to create a buffer between the residential area. 4. Light standards shall be 7' high and of the type which will cast the light downwards. 5. Commercial project shall have a security gate located near the front entrance on Bascom Avenue and shall be locked after business hours . 6. Window located at the rear of the building servicing the second floor shall be of the "clear story" type. Bottom of window to be at least 6'-6" off the floor and leaning towards the center of the building. 7. Trash receptacles are to be at least 100' from the rear boundary of the property. 8. Commercial project shall be separated from the residential area by an 8' solid, precast fence. 9. There shalt be a permanent 20' wide dedicated easement along the entire rear boundary of the commercial project dedicated to landscaping. These considerations are offered as a method of demonstrating our sincere intentions. to gain the support and confidence of the Whiteoaks Homeowners Association. We are anxious to undertake a project that will be beneficial to att those involved. Sincerely, BAR NSO BUILDER --~ ` Math' Fidiam MF:hj ~H~NI' s~-~- t( ¢ tr~.e,,~Tj 30' k4 0' F~o*~1 Ra.~~t 3wn~cx,~,~ . ~ ~;,~~ (/ n // 1/ / 1 ~, ~~ / RECO1~9rIENDED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: S 88-20 SITE ADDRESS: 14409 & 14391 S. BASCOM AVE. APPLICANT: K. ANDERSON & BARRY SWENSON BUILDER PC MTG: 12-13-88 i 1. The proposed project is an appropriate scale in relationship to the ~- adjacent developed uses. 2. The building design is considered acceptable and interesting by the Architectural Advisor. 3. The parking provided exceeds the code requirement of 6 spaces per doctor. 4. The project is designed to minimize infringement on neighboring properties. 5. The project is of a high quality design and will be aesthetically pleasing. 6. Substantial landscaping has been provided which adds to the aesthetics of the project. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE ~i S 88-20 SITE ADDRESS: 14409 & 14391 S. BASCOM AVE. APPLICANT: K. ANDERSON PC MTG DATE: 12-13-88 The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. 1. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 2. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. Fencing plan and lighting plan indicating location and design details of fencing and lighting to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $15,000.00 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. _ Bond or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to ~ application for a building permit. 5. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department,. prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if boxes are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director. 6. Applicant to submit a letter to the Planning Department, satisfactory to the City Attorney, prior to application for building permit, limiting the use of the property as follows: the practice of 18 doctors. 7. All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. 8. Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are installed. 9. All parking .and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. 10. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code. 11. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate ^' clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE # S 88-20 SITE .ADDRESS: 14409 & 14391 S. BASCOM AVE. APPLICANT: K. ANDERSON PG. 2 12. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by Planning and Building Departments (Section 21.53 of the Campbell Municipal Code). 13. Ordinance No. 782, of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. 14. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure area to service these containers. 15. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. 16. The applicant is hereby notified that the property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures shall be secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed from the property. Sect. 11.201 & 11.414, 1979 Ed. Uniform Fire Code. BUILDING DEPARTMENT 17. Retaining walls at property lines are limited to a height of 15 inches if constructed of wood. 18. Plans are structurally incomplete. It appears that the classifications will be: Offices - B2; Garage -B1. Therefore, one hour separation required between structures. Elevator stafts shall be enclosed per 1706 - 1985 UBC. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 19. Process and file a parcel map. 20. Dedicate additional land to widen Whiteoaks Rd. to 30 ft. from centerline. 21. Construct standard half street improvements on whiteoaks Rd. frontage and remainder of standard street improvements on Bascom Ave. frontage. 22. Pay storm drain area fee. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE 4i S 88-20 SITE ADDRESS: 14409 & 14391 S. BASCOM AVE. APPLICANT: K. ANDERSON PG. 23. Create a drainage easement for the medical complex across the residential lots to Whiteoaks Rd. 24. Prepare a traffic study including mitigation measures. FIRE DEPARTMENT 25. Parking shall be prohibited on the fire access driveways. Approved signs giving notice to that effect shall be posted. All curbs not designated for parking shall be apinted traffic red. Uniform Fire Code 10.207(k). 26. Provide 1 municipal-style fire hydrant(s) (4" x 2-1/2" x 2-1/2") at the following location(s): S. Bascom Ave. entrance (Uniform Fire Code 10.301(c). 27. An approved fire sprinkler system complying with NFPA Standard X113 shall be provided for the entire structure including all overhangs,, canopies, .and trash enclosures within 10' of the building. Uniform Fire Code 10.308(a). `~ ~ i // ~. 3803 & 3805 South Bascom Avenue 1956 White Oaks Road f ~~~r~~ RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL: S 88-21 SITE ADDRESS: 710 & 722 BUDD AVE. APPLICANT: K. ANDERSON PC MTG: 12-13-88 1. The proposed project is an appropriate scale in relationship to the adjacent developed uses. 2. The project is well designed and architecturally blends into the neighborhood. 3. The building design is considered acceptable and interesting by the Architectural Advisor. 4. The parking provided exceeds the code requirements of 2 spaces per unit. 5. The project is designed to minimize infringement on neighboring properties. ~ ~ CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE 4~ S 88-21 SITE ADDRESS: 710 & 722 BUDD AVE. APPLICANT: K. ANDERSON PC MTG DATE: 12-13-88 The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of _ the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. 1. Revised elevations and/or site plan indicating revised setbacks for Lots 1 & 11 to be submitted to the Planning.Department and approved by the Planning Director upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor prior to application for a building permit. 2. Fencing plan to be approved by the Planningt Director. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 3. Landscaping plan indicating protection of existing trees to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planningt Director prior to application fpr a building permit. 4. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if boxes are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director. 5. Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are installed. 6. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. 7. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code. 8. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the Iacation of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. 9. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. 10. Noise levels for the interior of residential units shall comply with minimum State (Title 25) and local standards as indicated in the Noise Element of the Campbell General Plan. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE ~i S 88-21 SITE ADDRESS: 710 & 722 BUDD AVE. APPLICANT: K. ANDERSON PG. 2 11. Applicant is hereby notified that he will be required to pay Park Dedication In-Lieu Fee which will be assessed at the time the subdivision map is submitted. 12. The applicant is hereby notified that-the property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures shall be secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed from the property. Sect. 11.201 & 11.414, 1979 Ed. Uniform Fire Code. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION 13. Process and file a subdivision map. 14. Install street improvements in Budd Ave. and the new street. 15. Obtain approval of the name for the new street from the Civic Improvement commission and the County Communications Center. 16. Pay storm drain area fee. 17. Submit on-site grading and drainage plan for approval of the City Engineer. --~ BUILDING DIVISION No comments at this time. FIRE DEPARTMENT 18. Provide one municipal-style fire hydrant (4 x 2-1/2 x 2-1/2") on Budd Ave. near main access. i( ~. _..t _ s ~~ y _~. I~ 4 • / /~ 710 & 722 Budd Avenue 0 • 1 L' ~ A ~ 1et1. A-J ~ ~ ~+ N-Ipi I1lslsl'~1 w •. w~lb T ~~ L~1 ~/ Pjt J ~~C /~Gti ~ ~/'l5 N -'~p1z '~r~ j6.~~....•' `~ ~' V~//f. ~~.1- ~ , ~"~~ /,"""yam / 4-. ~o~~~ ~~~.'r"~~~s. .e' ~ ~.'' ~' !~ ~~ ~ ~, , r ~... ~.. ~ r,-~~ ~~ ~~ .:~ ~~ ~' ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ r''~ ~ ~. ~t ~~' ~ '. ~ ~ ,~ as-- 11 ~ ~ ~/ '" f f R.~ ,~ „... w •i ~~// f ~,. Fr • ~ r' ,.~ .~ _ ~' ~';e ~' ` ~ ~ /' ~'r I~~f ! ~:s}Ftff ~ ~ " jfr;1 `„ ~ . tti 5•'F y ~ E~ f~a `~ ~ ~ - 'e f ~. ~ } ~ f~7 ~~„ ti's'"' ~'~~ '~ `~ ,~`~~''`~ ~'` ._ .~ .d.. ~-. - r" + R f ~+''"' '~~ r'/r ' ~ ' ' -' • ~ ~~ ~i -~ O'CONNOR HOSPITAL AT CAMPBELL ALCOHOL AND CHEMICAL DEPENDENCY TREATMENT CENTER 13 December 1988 TO: Planning Department City of Ca pbell '~ FROM: Glenda A. ss Administrator SUBJECT: UP 88-11 - Application for General Off-Sale Liquor License (100 West Hamilton) I have received a notice of hearing to consider an application to allow liquor sale at 100 West Hamilton Avenue. This memo is to request a denial of this application; to allow an additional site for liquor sale in this .5 square mile area seems excessive and not in keeping with the community image of Campbell. This location is on the very edge of a well established residential area and would be the fifth liquor store in this small commercial area. We treat alcoholism, a deadly disease, here at O'Connor at Campbell and cannot support excessive availability of-this substance. le ~~i 3/~~ --L~~-- 1 650 Winchester Blvd. Sponsored and Operated by Campbell, California 95008 the Daughters of Charity (40B) 866-9000 of St. Vincent de Paul ~. G ~ y Off- C-r~~.~3 ~ L~ ~ h1 -Ft~ ~ s-~-~L= 1 c-~ ~~ c=t~ C.A °~ s ~o g- ~~- S vim. ) M ~D-~ I ~ ~-~ w ~ J~ ~.c~ ~^Q- ~ _ ~ ~ ~-~`-`~,`~`~ ~ 0,.9~, ~ ~ o ~ . -4~.~..~ ~~ +~"~' e_ e~ - ~w ~ 1~~.~s~.1s ,~ -~ moo .~~~ .~~ .~ ~,~! 5~~,..~. h~ ~ ~,e.~-eJ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~. . ~~~ .moo ~~rv~ ~.,-~ ~.~.. o ~_ r~/~~~ o 6 ari~an qty diguoH~ ,~ 171 EAST HAMILTON AV1G CAMPBELL. GA 9'008 1~Oa • 8784320 408 - S78•5~33-! ~-~ ems-- ~ .~~ ova ~. ~ ~ a-~.d ~--~~., Cam' eJ~.l ~ .~.~ ~~ ..~ -tea ~~ '~ ~en.S~ ~ ~~ ~ c~J~ ~ ~. ~ ~..~ . __ -~~- ~ - ~ ..~ ~1 e~~~. _ 50~ _ ~ ~ sL~-e..~- CAMPBELL U-SAVE LfQUOR5 1575 WINCHESTER BLVD. t, CAMPBELL, CA 95008 -_ . BEE'S DRUGS ___ ~ _ - _ 1586 UVIf1CheSte!' '»~d. '~~ 4`A~r`.,. ~~ - QG~~iG Campbell, C;n_ ~ ~_. - -: _ ~- G-~-.._~ ,, vl ~. ~ t f-1 WI~~iG 3 ~, ~ _ ~~, ~~ ~ X773 W~NC~ r ~~ « } C ~: l LtCU ,~ _ y i~5s Yr. H~~n<<ton AYe /r~0 V- HAh+i~Trt~ ~;VE, ~~x aat262 ___ CAf~41ar'3~f_, CA g500~ (4a5) 37&5508 _. _ ___ _ -- GTE o ~ ~rnQ~~L~ _ . ~ ~02~" ~ ~ ~2.5"C 5 ~~.~ Ems' ~~~- ~1~. ' i~Y~'o~R-rte , ~~ --~~ ~~~..,~-e~ 3 ~ ©c~ s~ -~e~ .ems ~~ . ~~ ~''~ ~~~ , .5~..«.~o~ a~ ~ o ~ ~ o.~ rte, ~~ ~.. try ~ n 1,. ~ ~^- _ ~ ~~r. (' - r-. - ~ - ~ - - ; _ _ .-- - --------------- ~~ ~ s ~~ --_ __ --~~ - --- S - .. __ - ---- ,i`~~c~ ITEM # 6 PC MTG: 12~13/8B First United Metl~od~sr C1~urc~ ~~~ 1675 WINCHESTER BOULEVARD POST OFFICE BOX 875 CAMPBELL, CALIFORN/A 95009 PHONE (408) 378-3472 December 13, 1988 TO: PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CAMPBELL RE: APPLICATION FOR GENERAL OFF-SALE LIQUOR LICENSE AT 100 W. HAMILTON AVENUE Dear Members of the Planning Commission: Schedule conflicts prevent me from attending the meeting of December 13, 1988, at which time there will be consideration of the application of Mr. Jamal Ghalandari, on behalf of California Food Market, for approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow a general off-sale liquor license in conjunction with a grocery store located at 100 W. Hamilton Avenue. Given the fact that Campbell already has an excess of liquor-selling stores, and that the location under consideration is only a block from Rosemary School, I write in opposition to this application. I cannot imagine how our neighborhood (with a school; a retirement home--Wesley Manor, at 1655 Hamilton Avenue; and churches) will be served by yet another liquor-selling establishment. I am grateful that the property will be used in a productive way, but would urge that you reject this application. The United Methodist Church has a long history of advocating temperance in all things. Let us temper the availability of alcoholic beverages at this location. I write as pastor of an 1100 member church that seeks to serve this community and this neighborhood with wholesome, life-giving activity. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely yours, Richard. A. Corson co-pastor .~-~ . RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: M 88-27/PD 87-13 SITE ADDRESS: 65 SHELLEY AVE. APPLICANT: A. D'AMICO PC MTG: 12-13-88 1. The requested elimination of pavement treatment would operate a less attractive appearance for this pro3ect. 2. A composition shingle roof material does not present the same or similar character as the approved concrete roof tile. 3. The proposed replacement of the existing evergreen tree with a 24" box Birch tree is not considered acceptable. RECOMMENDED FINDINGS: S 67-02 SITE ADDRESS: 137 E. HAMILTON AVE APPLICANT: SHEPARDSEN, H. P. C. MTG.: 5-12-67 1. The proposed project is an appropriate scale in relationship to the adjacent developed uses. 2. The project is well designed and architecturally blends into the neighborhood. 3. The building design is considered acceptable and interesting by the Architectural Advisor. 4. The project is designed to minimize infringement on neighboring properties. 5. The project is of a high quality design and will be aesthetically pleasing. 6. Substantial landscaping has been provided which adds to the aesthetics of the project. Recommended Finding: Planning Commission (12-13-88) In Addition to the Above 1. The development standards and general plan have not changed for this area since the previous Planning Commission approval. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: S 87-02 Reinstated 12/13/88 APPLICANT: SHEPARDSEN, B. SITE ADDRESS: 137 E. HAMILTON AVE. P.C. MTG. 5-12-87 The applicant is notified as part of this application that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. 1. Propecty to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 2. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. mall plan indicating location and design details of wall to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of S 2,000.00 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to application for a building permit. 5. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department, prior to installation of PG6E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if boxes are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director. 6. All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. 7. Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are installed. 8. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. 9. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.16.070 of the Campbell Municipal Code. 10. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for undergcound utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. CONDITIONS OF A. .OVAL: S 87-02 REVISED APPLICANT: SHEPARDSEN, B. ADDED COND. #15 SITE ADDRESS: 137 E. HAMILTON AVE. PAGE 2. 11. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by Planning and Building Departments (Section 21.68.030 of the Campbell Municipal Code). 12. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 13. Obtain an excavation permit, pay fees, and post surety to widen driveway and any other work in the public right-of-way as required by City Engineer. FIRE DEPARTMENT 14. Because total square footage, will exceed 10,000 sq.ft., all areas of the new and existing building shall have an automatic sprinkler system installed. BUILDING DEPARTMENT No comments at this time. SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE 15. if, in the future, the Planning Commission finds that a parking problems exists at this site, the applicant or subsequent property owner shall submit a revised parking plan providing additional parking by either the reduction in on-site landscape or the provision of additional compact parking stalls. ~ q ~ r 3 ~ 4 •IMie~ N ur i ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ 1 0 ~~ ~ ~ ~ i~igl 111d1~~1e NAMILTniu O J O I I I I11 1 1 Il l:.~ol l l l l l l l l l i H I ~~ _. t '` ;. h ~ re. 137 E. HAMILTON AVE. r S 87-0?. s: AVE