Loading...
PC Min 09/27/1988PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CAMPBELL, CALIFORNIA ~i '~ 7:30 P.M. MINUTES SEPTEMBER 27, 1988 The Planning Commission of the City of Campbell convened this day in regular session at the regular meeting place, the Council Chambers of City Hall, 70 N. First St., Campbell, California. ROLL CALL Present Commissioners: Stanton, Olszewski, Walker, Dickson, Christ; Planning Director Arthur A. Kee, Planner II Tim Haley, Engineering Manager Bill Helms, City Attorney William R. Seligmann, Recording Secretary Linda Dennis. Absent Commissioners Kasolas and Perrine. Chairman Christ noted that Commissioners Kasolas and Perrine absences were excused due to personal and business commitments. APPROVAL OF MINUTES M/S: Dickson, Walker That the minutes of the Planning Commission -~ meeting of September 13, 1988 be approved as submitted. Motion carried 4-0-2-1, with Commissioner Stanton abstaining due to absence from that meeting, and Commissioners Kasolas and Perrine being absent. ~ ~ COMMUNICATIONS Planning Director Kee noted that communications received pertained to specific items on the agenda. Referral Referral from City Council regarding the appointment of two Commissioners to a Subcommittee regarding Dover School. Chairman Christ stated that Commissioner Olszewski and he would be on the Subcommittee, with Commissioners Dickson and Stanton as alternates. ~ ~ ~ ORAL REQUESTS Chairman Christ asked if anyone wished to address the Commission on an issue that was not agendized. There being no one, the Chairman proceeded with the set agenda. ! ~ ~ ~ -2- MISCELLANEOUS R 88-O1/M 88-08 Continued review of parking circulation plan S 86-21 - Pruneyard Inn - 1875 S. Bascom Ave. Planning Director Kee reviewed the Staff Report of September 27, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval as redlined. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval as redlined. The applicant is in agreement with the redlining of the presented plans which indicates the accentuation of ingress/egress points of circulation. M/S: Dickson, Stanton - That the Planning Commission approve the parking circulation plan, as redlined, for S 86-21/M 88-08/R 88-01 for the Pruneyard Inn. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). SA 88-09 Pruneyard Inn Continued review of signing program - Pruneyard Inn - 1875 S. Bascom Ave. Planner II Haley reviewed the Staff Report of September 27, 1988, noting which -~ of the requested signage Staff is recommending be approved. Mr. Morris Stark, applicant, noted that it was agreed to remove an island sign; however, it was requested that "Hotel Parking Only" be allowed on the wall. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval per Staff's recommendations, and would also support Mr. Stark's request to be included in Staff Recommendation "C". M/S: Walker, Stanton - That the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and approve SA 88-09 per the attached recommendations, including the addition of "Hotel Parking Only" only item C. Motion carried 5-0-2. * ~ ~ M 83-14 Continued one year review of use of temporary Church structures on property known as 110 W. Latimer Ave. - Our Mother of Perpetual Help Church - R-3-S (Multiple Family Residential) Zoning District. Planner II Haley reviewed the Staff Report of September 27, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval of this request. -3- Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval. M/S: Dickson, Walker - That the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and grant a 12 month extension to use two temporary classroom structures on the subject property. Motion carried 5-0-2. * ~ Request Continued request of Mrs. Rosa Guerra for Guerra, R. approval of a location for the placement of a satellite dish antenna on property known as 1009 Virginia Ave. in an R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District. Planner II Haley reviewed the Staff Report of September 27, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval of this request. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval per the Staff Report, with the screening trees to be relocated to an appropriate position. "~ M/S: Walker, Olszewski - That the Planning Commission adopt the attached findings and approve the requested deviation, subject to the attached conditions. Motion carried 5-0-2. ~ ~ PUBLIC HEARINGS ZC 88-07 Continued public hearing to consider the PD 88-11 application of Maison Construction for Maison Construction approval of a zone change from R-M-S (Multiple Family Residential) to P-D (Planned Development) and approval of a Planned Development Permit, plans, elevations and development schedule to allow the construction of 6 townhomes on property known as 600 W. Sunnyoaks Ave. in an R-M-S (Multiple Family/Low Medium Density Residential) Zoning District. Planner II Haley reviewed the Staff Report of September 27, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval of this application. The distance between the buildings is typical of the R-M-S zoning district; however, there are lesser. setbacks proposed in two areas as a result of the turret element and it's height of 20 feet. -4- Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee discussed the issues of the long, narrow driveway and common open space. It is the opinion of the Committee that the driveway issue is addressed with landscaping elements. -- Although there is no usable common open space on the site, the Committee is of the opinion that private open space would be more beneficial to the residents, since the amount of common open space which could be provided would be insignificant. Additionally, the Committee feels that the lesser setbacks resulting from the turret element are considered acceptable. Therefore, the Site Committee is recommending approval of this application. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. M/S: Walker, Stanton - That the public hearing on ZC 88-07/PD 88-11 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). M/S: Olszewski, Stanton - 1. That the Planning Commission recommend .that the City Council accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared for this project; and 2. That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2551, incorporating the "~ attached findings, recommending that the City Council approve a zone change from R-M-S to -- PD; and 3. That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2552, incorporating the attached findings, recommending that the City Council approve a Planned Development Permit for this project, subject to the attached conditions. Discussion on motion Commissioner Olszewski expressed a concern about the percolation ponds located behind this project, noting that they are potentially dangerous as they currently exists. He suggested that the time has come for the property to be used for mixed recreational uses, in light of the need for common open space. Commissioner Dickson opposed the motion because it is at the high end of the density range and does not have extra amenities as it should for a PD zoning. Additionally, the driveway is not sufficiently broken up, there is no common open space, and the PD should not allow lesser setbacks. Chairman Christ opposed the motion, noting that this major concern was about parking. The parking has been increased; however, the density is being kept at the higher end. Chairman Christ commented that the community is being paved over, and that open space and greenery. is needed; and, although the project design is quite good, he would rather see the density decreased. - i -5- Vote on motion Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Stanton, Olszewski, Walker NOES: Commissioners: Dickson, Christ ABSENT: Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine. * ~ ~ V 88-06 Continued public hearing to consider the Leinwetter, P. application of Mr. Paul Leinwetter for a variance to the side and rear yard setbacks and a variance to the requirement allowing only one accessory building over 200 sq.ft. in size in order to allow the construction of a detached carport on property known as 1171 E1 Solyo Ave. in an R-1 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District. Planner II Haley reviewed the Staff Report of September 27, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending denial of this variance. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. Mr. Gary Lord, 1150 Arroyo Seco, opposed the variance noting that the already constructed carport is the complete focus from every room of his home, and it is very unaesthetic and undesirable. Mr. Paul Leinwetter, applicant, stated that he is now requesting only two variances - a variance from the requirement to pave the portion where the vehicles are parked, and a variance to the number of structures on the lot. Mr. Leinwetter spoke at length regarding the requirements for a variance and why his situation is unique. He feels that the size of the property justifies another structure; that a denial would deprive him from enjoying his property; a denial would deny him the personal satisfaction of his hobby of collecting cars; that the carport is not detrimental to the public welfare; that removal fo the structure would result in a hardship on his part; that it is not economically feasible for him to attach the structure to his house; that this is a precedent case that cannot be compared to other situations in the same zoning district since no one else has expressed an interest in having a carport of this size in their back yard; and, that he is not creating a problem that affects safety, welfare, etc. of this zoning district. Mr. Leinwetter continued that he is sympathic to his neighbors complaints regarding aesthetics of the structure, and he would mitigate these problems by planting trees, however, he cannot afford to plant mature vegetation. He continued that the other neighbors are not much affected by his proposal, and they hardly see the structure because of vegetation in their yards. -6- Planning Director Kee noted that it would appear from the applicant's testimony - that he is submitting a plan which has not been reviewed by Staff, and it would be appropriate to continue the matter so that Staff could review it and prepare a report for the Commission. Mr. Kee noted that 907 of the structure is complete - without permits of any kind. Commissioner Olszewski stated that he did not see any hardship in this matter, and that the fact that the lot was twice as big as most other lots is not a hardship. Additionally, there does not appear to be much happening to rectify the situation. Commissioner Olszewski felt that the residents of the neighborhood deserved a decision on this matter. Commissioner Walker noted his sympathy for the applicant because of the strange location of his property; however, this situation is occuring in one of Campbell's premier neighborhoods and it not appropriate in-this location. Commissioner Walker continued that although he would lean towards denial of this request, he would like to see something worked out between the applicant and the neighbors. Commissioner Dickson stated this is an R-1 neighborhood, and a second accessory building is not allowed in an R-1 area. Chairman Christ expressed his concern with the aesthetics of the structure and the fact that it does not meet code. He noted that he would like to see '~ something that the neighbors do not object to - something with screening that is architecturally compatible with the neighborhood. Commissioner Stanton noted that this issue has been dragged on for some time, and the neighbors deserve a decision. Discussion ensued regarding possihle actions on this matter. M/S: Olszewski, Stanton - That the public hearing on V 88-06 be closed. Motion carried 4-1-2. M/S: Stanton, Dickson - That the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution denying V 88-06. Motion fails with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: NOES: Commissioners: ABSENT: Commissioners: M/S: Olszewski, Walker - M/S: Olszewski, Walker - Stanton, Dickson Olszewski, Walker, Christ Kasolas, Perrine. That the public hearing on V 8$-06 be reopened. Motion carried 3-2-2. That the public hearing on V 88-06 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of October 25, 1988. ---, -7- Discussion Commissioner Stanton opposed the motion, noting that he was not sure that the applicant could make a final answer available to the Commission in one month. Commissioner Dickson noted that the applicant would still have to request a variance. Commissioner Walker supported a longer continuance so that the applicant could seek professional advise. Mr. Leinwetter felt that the one month continuance would be adequate. he indicated that the variances he is applying for have changed since originally submittal, and that it would not be economically feasible for him to have professional assistance. He asked how the Staff would feel about granting him a permit to have the structure until spring, at which time he would consider removing it. Vote on motion for continuance Motion carried with a vote of 3-2-2. * ~ ~ UP 88-09 Public hearing to consider the application of Lazares, D. Mr. David Lazares for approval of a conditional use permit to allow the conversion of an existing health spa to an office building on property known as 577 Salmar Ave. in an Interim Zoning District. Planner II Haley reviewed the Staff Report of September 27, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval of this application. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. Discussion entailed additional landscaping along the north and west elevations, and this will be addressed in landscaping plans to be reviewed by the Committee. The Committee is of the opinion that this is an exceptional design, therefore, approval is recommended. Mr. Haley, responding to questions from the Commission, indicated that Staff feels the parking is adequate and is similar to other office projects approved by the Commission. Commissioner Walker asked about the proposed tenant for the building, noting that the site has a potential parking problem and there is no on-street parking in this area. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. -8- Mr. David Lazares, applicant, stated he did not feel parking would be a problem -. in that the parking ratio for this project is similar to his building at 851 E. ~ Hamilton Ave. and there is never a parking problem (with only 50~ of the spaces being utilized during peak hours). M/S: Olszewski, Stanton - That the public hearing on UP 88-09 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). M/S: Dickson, Stanton - That the Planning Commission accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared for this project; and, that the Commission adopt Resolution No. 2553, incorporating findings and conditions indicated in the Staff Report of September 27, 1988, approving UP 88-09; and, that this Use Permit be forwarded to the City Council for ratification. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Stanton, Olszewski, Walker, Dickson, Christ NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine. ZC 88-09 Public hearing to consider the application of PD 88-13 Mr. Steve Saraydpour, on behalf of NADCON NADCON Development Development, for a zone change from Saraydpour, S. R-1-8 (Single Family Residential) to PD (Planned Development), and approval of a Planned Development Permit, plans, elevations, and development schedule to allow construction of~4 single family homes on property known as 1231 Hacienda Ave. Planner II Haley reviewed the Staff Report of September 27, 1988, noting that the presented plans address the concerns indicated in the report. Staff is, therefore, recommending approval. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is also recommending approval. The suggested redesign of the greenhouse is minor, and can be approved by Staff . Chairman Christ requested clarification of the elevations along Hacienda Ave.; expressed a concern that the fencing on the east elevation, between the residential properties, be provided with some type of architectural element; and, asked about the proposed street improvements. Engineering Manager Helms indicated that the street improvements would be standard, with restriping of the frontages. It is Staff's opinion that the ` ingress/egress should work satisfactorily. I -9- Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. Mr. Steve Saray, NADCON Development, indicated that the fence will have a stucco column every 6 feet on the east elevation; and, the buildings have been designed to prevent a straight vertical appearance from the street elevation. M/S: Olszewski, Stanton - That the public hearing on ZC 88-09/PD 88-13 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). M/S: Dickson, Walker - 1. That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared for this project. - 2. That the Planning Commission adopt Resolutions No. 2554 & 2555, incorporating findings and conditions as indicated in the Staff Report of September 27, 1988, recommending that the City Council approve ZC 88-09/PD 88-13. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Stanton, Olszewski, Walker, Dickson, Christ NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine. ~t** GP 88-04 Public hearing to consider the application of Ainsley Development Ainsley Development, Inc. for an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan from Industrial/Low-Medium Density Residential to Commercial for properties known as 31 & 49 Page St. and from Industrial to Commercial for properties known as 32 & 42 Foote St. Planning Director Kee reviewed the Staff Report of September 27, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval. Commissioner Olszewski asked if this matter was referred to the Redevelopment Agency; and, expressed his concern with housing in this area, noting that by changing the General Plan there is some low-medium density residential lost. Mr. Kee responded that this application was referred to the Redevelopment Department, and plans will be forthcoming after review by an independent architect through the Redevelopment Agency. Additionally, Staff's recommendation for: this redevelopment area is for high density. ~ Discussion ensued regarding the scope of the redevelopment area, and the directions the Specific Plan proposes relating to traffic measures. -10- Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. Ms. Carrie Williams, 600 Maple Ave., supported the application and supported redevelopment of the site. Ms. Williams noted that the bµilders are working with the neighborhood; that the neighborhood has concerns about the traffic and overflow parking; significant landscaping is requested on the site; and no access to Page Avenue would be preferred. Mr. Jeff Wyatt, Ainsley Development, noted that the project would begin as soon as possible, and that the existing Shoe Fair store will be removed. M/S: Dickson, Walker - That the public hearing on GP 88-04 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). ,~ M/S: Dickson, Stanton - 1. That the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council accept the Negative Declaration which has been prepared. 2. That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2556, incorporating findings as indicated in the Staff Report of September 27, 1988, recommending that the City Council approve GP 88-04. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: "~ AYES: Commissioners: Stanton, Olszewski, Walker, Dickson, Christ -- NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine. The Commissioner recessed at 9:35 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 9:50 p.m. ~ ~ S 88-17 Public hearing to consider the application of Barnes, S. Mr. David Barnes for approval of a site and architectural application to allow the construction of a single family home on property known as 1035 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd. in an R-1-9 (Single Family Residential) Zoning District. Planner II Haley reviewed the Staff Report of September 27, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval of this item. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending approval. -11- Chairman Christ opened the public hearing. and invited anyone to speak on this item. M/S: Dickson, Walker - That the public hearing on S 88-17 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). M/S: Dickson, Stanton - That the Planning Commission adopt the findings and conditions indicated in the Staff Report of September 27, 1988, and approve S 88-17. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Stanton, Olszewski, Walker, Dickson, Christ NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine. ~ ~ S 88-08 Continued public hearing to consider the Varrelmann, R. application of Mr. Robert Varrelmann for a Site and Architectural Approval of plans, elevations, and development schedule to allow the construction of an office/industrial building on property known as 380 Industrial ~~ St. in an M-1-S (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Planner II Haley reviewed the Staff Report of September 27, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval of this item. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was reviewed by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. Approval is recommended, subject to revised plans being approved by the Committee. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. M/S: Dickson, Stanton - That the public hearing on S 88-08 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). M/S: Dickson, Walker - That the Planning Commission adopt the findings and conditions indicated in the Staff Report of September 27, 1988, and approve S 88-08 subject to approval of revised plans by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Stanton, Olsewski, Walker, Dickson, Christ NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine. ~ ~ -12- PD 88-06 Continued public hearing to consider the Perez, G. application of Mr. Gregory Perez for a Planned Development Permit, plans, elevations, and development schedule to allow the construction of a single family homes on property known as 690 S. San Tomas Aquino Rd. in a PD (Planned Development/Low-Density Residential) Zoning District. Planner II Haley reviewed the Staff Report of September 27, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval of this item. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was reviewed by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and approval is recommended. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. M/S: Dickson, Stanton - That the public hearing on S 88-08 be closed. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). M/S: Olszewski, Stanton - That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2557, incorporating findings and conditions indicated in the Staff Report of September 27, 1988, recommending that the City Council approve PD 88-06 as redlined. - Motion carried with the following roll call vote: i AYES: Commissioners: Stanton, Olsewski, Walker, Dickson, Christ NOES: Commissioners: None ABSENT: Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine. ~ ~ PD 88-10 Continued public hearing to consider the Ward, G. R. application of G. R. Ward, General Contractor, for approval of a Planned Development Permit, plans, elevations, and development schedule to allow the construction of 3 townhomes on property known as 1430 W. Latimer Ave, in a PD (Planned Development/Medium Density Residential) Zoning District. Planner II Haley reviewed the Staff Report of September 27, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending a continuance to the first meeting in November. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was considered by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is of the opinion that the development does not meet the minimum criteria for a PD development. -13- Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. M/S: Dickson, Stanton - That the public hearing on PD 88-10 be continued to the first Planning Commission meeting in November 1988. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). S 88-16 Public hearing to consider the application of Rusted, N. Mr. Norman Rusted for approval of a site and architectural application to allow the construction of a retail building on property known as 1870 S. Bascom Ave. in a C-2-S (General Commercial) Zoning District. Planner II Haley reviewed the Staff Report of September 27, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending a continuance to October 11, 1988. Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was review by the Site and Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is also recommending a continuance to October 11, 1988. Chairman Christ opened the public hearing and invited anyone to speak on this item. Commissioner Dickson asked that consideration be given to how this project abuts single family development. Chairman Christ asked the Site Committee to be especially sensitive to the parking problems in this area. M/S: Walker, Stanton - That the public hearing on S 88-16 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of October 11, 1988. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). ~ ~ ~ M 88-14 Continued public hearing to consider the PD 88-01 application of Mr. Roger Edsinger for a Edsinger, R. modification to approved plans to allow the construction of an office and storage building on property known as 219 Dillon Ave. in a PD (Planned Development/Industrial) Zoning District. Planner II Haley reviewed the Staff Report of September 27, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending approval. -14- Commissioner Olszewski reported that this item was discussed by the Site and __, Architectural Review Committee. The Committee is recommending a continuance to the first meeting in November. It was noted that the applicant is making an attempt to make the proposed addition more compatible with the existing structure. Chairman Chrrst opened the public hearing and invited anyone to ppeak on this item. M/S: Walker, Stanton - That the public hearing on M 88-14/PD 88-03 be continued to the first Planning Commission meeting in November 1988. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). ~ ~ R 88-03 Continued public hearing to consider the UP 84-04 application of South Bay Covenant Church for South Bay Covenant a reinstatement of a previously approved Use Permit which allowed the establishment of a church on property known as 1300 Sheffield Ave. (Dover School) in a P-F (Public Facilities) Zoning District. Planner II Haley reviewed the Staff Report of September 27, 1988, noting that this item is recommended for continuance in order that a Subcommittee could meet with adjacent property owners and the School District, as directed by the City Council. Chairman Christ opened the public heaiing and invited anyone to speak on this item. M/S: Dickson, Walker - That the public hearing on R 88-03/UP 84-04 be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of October 25, 1988. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). MISCELLANEOUS SA 88-23 Continued signing request - Campbell Travel Best Awning Service - 389 E. Campbell Ave. - PD (Planned Development) Zoning District. Planning Director Kee reviewed the Staff Report of September 27, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending denial without prejudice in order to remove this item from the agenda. Commissioner Olszewski reported that the Site and Architectural Review Committee is also recommending denial without prejudice, noting the length of time this item has been on the agenda without revised plans having been submitted. -15- M/S: Dickson, Stanton - That the Planning Commission deny SA 88-23, without prejudice, to remove it from the agenda. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). UP 88-06 Johansen, L. Proposed findings for approved Use Permit allowing Large Family Day Care Home - 256 Calado Ave. Planner II Haley reviewed the Staff Report of September 27, 1988, noting that Staff is recommending that the Commission adopt the attached findings for the previously approved use permit. Commissioners Dickson and Stanton disagreed with Finding ~~7. M/S: Olszewski, Walker - That the Planning commission adopt the attached findings for UP 88-06, and that these findings be incorporated into Resolution No. 2547. Motion carried with the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners: Olszewski, Walker, Christ NOES: Commissioners:' Dickson, Stanton ABSENT: Commissioners: Kasolas, Perrine. ~ * ~ SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS Subcommittee Reports Site & Architectural Review Procedure Subcommittee; Tree Preservation Committee; Site & Architectural Review Committee. Tree Preservation Committee Commissioner Olszewski reported that the summary of the report and recommendations are indicated under "Recommendation ~i3", with details to be worked at later in the process. Committeemembers have encountered a number of situations where there has been a need for retaining walls and trees are not located where they were indicated on the presented plans. The Committee is of the opinion that accurate information is needed on the presented plans. Additionally, this type of ordinance would be a good way to be sensitive to neighborhoods and enhance the environment. Commissioner Walker asked that the circumference of the trees to be retained be 25 inches even, rather than the 25.1 inches as indicated in Recommendation ~~1. Additionally, he asked if a full topographic survey was really needed, noting that this would, mean the provision of two maps -- one for the existing and one for the developed 'site. In conclusion, Commissioner Walker liked Recommendation ,~4 the most. -16- Commissioner Stanton noted that the topo maps would serve the Planning Commission for drainage information as well as tree preservation. Engineering Manager Helms reported that the Public Works Department currently reviews the on-site drainage plans and requires detailed grading plans in the "after" condition showing existing contours and finished grades. This is a little different from a topo map in that it doesn't locate all existing features. The Commission should be aware that requiring a topo map would add approximately X2,000-3,000 to the processing costs of an application, and can be very burdensome to get a topo map for a preliminary application. Commissioner Dickson stated that Recommendation 4t1 appears to be too much of an intrusion on privacy of homeowners, and will also be reflected back onto new lots. Commissioner Dickson stated that he was against tree permits for existing lots. Recommendation 4i2 is going in the wrong direction in that home costs are out of sight now and this would only add to those high costs. Commissioner Dickson felt that there was no scarcity of trees in the area, and therefore could not support the recommendation. Chairman Christ agreed with Commissioner Dickson, especially regarding Recommendation 4~2; noted that he can understand why accurate tree locations is necessary; agreed that a method is needed to protect trees on property prior to development; disagreed with the expense of the topo survey; agreed with the recommendation for a grading ordinance; :and, agreed with some type of policy to'~ deal with replacement of trees. Commissioner Olszewski indicated that the Committee's conclusion is that the recommendation should be adopted and presented to the City council to direct Staff to take action in establishing an ordinance based on recommendations of the advisory committee and the intent to be flexible. Mr. Helms stated that the Public Works Staff has some concerns about some of the items in the report and it would be helpful for the Public Works, Building, and Planning Staff to go through the existing ordinances to see how much could be accomplished through existing ordinances. M/S: Dickson, Olszewski - That this item be continued to the Planning Commission meeting of October 25, 1988, in order that Staff may investigate implementation of the recommendations through existing ordinances. Motion carried unanimously (5-0-2). ADJOURNMENT ATTEST: Arthur A. Kee Secretary. RECORDED: Linda A. Dennis Recording Secretary There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:45 p.m. APPROVED: Ronald W. Christ Chairman RECOMMENDED FINDINGS: R 88-01/M 88-08/S 86-21 1875 S. BASCOM AVE. PRUNEYARD INN 1. The proposed circulation plan as redlined provides an acceptable circulation pattern for ingress/egress to this use. 2. The provision of an entry wall helps define the parking. area. 3. Substantial landscaping has been provided which adds to the aesthetics of the project. FINDINGS FOR SIGNS RECOMMENDID FOR APPROVAL FILE: SA 88-09 SITE ADDRESS: 1875 S. BASCOM AVE. APPLICANT: THE PRUNEYARD INN 1. The hotel will be difficult to locate without the proposed additional signing. 2. The proposed signs are well designed, and complete the signage program for the hotel. 3. Because of the size of the Pruneyard Shopping Center, the proposed signs will assist hotel guests in finding their way to the hotel with a minimum of confusion. FINDINGS FOR SIGNS RECOMMENDED FOR DENIAL 1. The entry sign proposed to be located in a traffic island in front of the parking lot entrance and the proposed canopy sign are considered excessive. 2. The hotel is adequately identified with the previously approved signs and those signs recommended for approval in this application. ~ ~ ~ CONDITION OF APPROVAL Applicant to secure all required permits prior to erection/installation of signs. * ~ ~ FILE 4~ SA 88-09 PRUNEYARD-INN 1875 S BASCOM AVE APPROVED BY PLANNING COMMISSION AT MEETING OF SEPTEMBER Z7, 1988 A. The addition of a new 50 sq. ft. sign reading "The Pruneyard Inn" on the existing freestanding sign on Bascom Ave. (near the Aloha Apartments). B. The addition of a new 50 sq.ft. sign reading "The Pruneyard Inn" on the existing freestanding sign on Campbell Avenue (near Union Avenue). C. A 15 sq.ft. sign reading "The Pruneyard Inn" to be located on a new wall to be located at the auto entrance to the hotel parking area. "Hotel Parking Only" sign to be allowed on wall. D. The "Exit" and "Exit, Right Turn Only" signs subject to their being reduced from 10 sq.ft. to 6 sq.ft. ~ ~ RECOMMENDED FINDINGS: M 88-14 SITE ADDRESS: 110 W. LATIMER AVE. APPLICANT: OUR MOTHER OF PERPETUAL HELP CHURCH PC MTG: 9-27-88 1. The Church is still attempting to resolve their space limitations by moving to a larger facility. 2. No complaints have been received regarding the use of the temporary structures. 3. Parking has not been a problem. 4. The trailers are not visible from the street. ~ ~ ~ C~ RECOMMENDED FINDINGS: SATELLITE DISH ANTENNA SITE ADDRESS: 1009 VIRGINIA AVE. APPLICANT: GUERRA, R. PC MTG: 9-27-88 _ 1. The property is unique because it is highly visible from the street in front of the house and also the street behind the house. Because of this, the applicant is unable to comply with the portion of the ordinance which requires that the dish antenna not be visible from a public street. 2. A two-story house exists on the adjacent property to the south. The 17-foot height of the antenna is necessary to receive clear signals. 3. The planting of trees will provide effective screening of the antenna. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1009 VIRGINIA AVE. SATELLITE DISH ANTENNA 1. Within 15 days of approval, submit a landscape plan for approval of -~ the Planning Director indicating the tree type, size, and location to screen the antenna. Trees to be planted within 30 days of approval of (, plan. \`- 2. Obtain all necessary permits from the Building Department within 30 days of approval. P,ECOMMENDED FINDINGS: S 88-17 SITE ADDRESS: 1035 S. SAN TOMAS AQUINO RD. APPLICANT: D. BARNES PC MTG: 9-27-88 1. The proposed project is an appropriate scale in relationship to the adjacent developed uses. 2. The project is well designed and architecturally blends into the neighborhood. 4. The parking provided meets/exceeds the code requirements. 5. The project is designed to minimize infringement on neighboring properties. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SITE ADDRESS: 1035 S. APPLICANT: D. BARNES PC MTG DATE: 9-27-88 - FILE ~~ S 88-17 SAN TOMAS AQUINO RD. The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. 1. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 2. Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of a building permit. 3. Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are installed. 4. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. 5. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code. 6. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. 7. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal. of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business., industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. 8. Noise levels for the interior of residential units shall comply with minimum State (Title 25) and local standards as indicated in the Noise Element of the Campbell General Plan. 9. The applicant is hereby notified that the property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures shall be secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed from the property. Sect. 11.201 & 11.414, 1979 Ed. Uniform Fire Code. BUILDING DEPARTMENT 10. Retaining walls at property lines are limited to a height of 15 inches if constructed of wood. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE ~l S 88-17 SITE ADDRESS: 1035 S. SAN TOMAS AQUINO RD. APPLICANT: D. BARNES PC MTG DATE: 9-27-88 11. Meet all requirement of the Building Department and obtain a building permit prior to construction. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 12. Dedicate additional land to widen San Tomas Aquino Rd. to 30 feet from centerline. 13. Install street improvements. 14. Pay storm drainage area fee. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 15. Applicant to enter into an agreement, satisfactory to the City Attorney, indicating that the proposed cabana will not be used as a living unit. RECOA4rIENDED FINDINGS: S 88-08 SITE ADDRESS: 380 INDUSTRIAL ST. APPLICANT: VARRELMANN, R. PC MTG: 9-27-88 1. The proposed project is an appropriate scale in relationship to the adjacent developed uses. 2. The building design is considered acceptable and interesting by the Architectural Advisor, with the recommended changes. 3. The parking provided meets the code requirements with the reduction in ' building size. 4. The project is of a high quality design and will be aesthetically pleasing. 5. Substantial landscaping has been provided which adds to the aesthetics of the project. {~-• CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE ~~ S 88-08 REVISED ITEM N0. 13 SITE ADDRESS: 380 INDUSTRIAL ST. , APPLICANT:- VARRELMANN, R. PC MTG DATE: 9-27-88 The applicant is hereby notified, as part of this application, that he/she is required to meet the following conditions in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the Laws of the State of California. Additionally, the applicant is hereby notified that he/she is required to comply with all applicable Codes or Ordinances of the City of Campbell and the State of California which pertain to this development and are not herein specified. 1. Revised elevations and/or site plan to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee upon recommendation of the Architectural Advisor prior to application for a building permit. 2. Property to be fenced and landscaped as indicated and/or added in red on the plans. Landscaping and fencing shall be maintained in accordance with the approved plans. 3. Landscaping plan indicating type and size of plant material, and location of irrigation system to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Site and Architectural Review Committee and/or Planning Commission prior to issuance of a building permit. '~ 4. Fencing plan indicating location and design details of fencing to be submitted to the Planning Department and approved by the Planning Director prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. Applicant to either (1) post a faithful performance bond in the amount of $5,000.00 to insure landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas within 3 months of completion of construction; or (2) file written agreement to complete landscaping, fencing, and striping of parking areas. Bond or agreement to be filed with the Planning Department prior to application for a building permit. 6. Applicant to submit a plan to the Planning Department, prior to installation of PG&E utility (transformer) boxes, indicating the location of the boxes and screening (if boxes are above ground) for approval of the Planning Director. 7. Applicant to submit a letter to the Planning Department, satisfactory to the City Attorney, prior to application for building permit, limiting the use of the property as follows: 1,130 sq.ft. for industrial; and 1,294 sq.ft. for office use. 8. All mechanical equipment on roofs and all utility meters to be screened as approved by the Planning Director. 9. Building occupancy will not be allowed until public improvements are installed. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE 4E S 88-08 SITE ADDRESS: 380 INDUSTRIAL ST. , APPLICANT: VARRELMANN, R. PAGE 2. 10. All parking and driveway areas to be developed in compliance with Chapter 21.50 of the Campbell Municipal Code. All parking spaces to be provided with appropriate concrete curbs or bumper guards. 11. Underground utilities to be provided as required by Section 20.36.150 of the Campbell Municipal Code. 12. Plans submitted to the Building Department for plan check shall indicate clearly the location of all connections for underground utilities including water, sewer, electric, telephone and television cables, etc. 13. Sign application to be submitted in accordance with provisions of the Sign Ordinance for all signs. No sign to be installed until application is approved and permit issued by Planning and Building Departments (Section 21.53 of the Campbell Municipal Code). 14. Ordinance No. 782 of the Campbell Municipal Code stipulates that any contract for the collection and disposal of refuse, garbage, wet garbage and rubbish produced within the limits of the City of Campbell shall be made with Green Valley Disposal Company. This requirement applies to all _ single-family dwellings, multiple apartment units, to all commercial, business, industrial, manufacturing, and construction establishments. "'~'' ~_ 15. Trash container(s) of a size and quantity necessary to serve the development shall be located in area(s) approved by the Fire Department. _ Unless otherwise noted, enclosure(s) shall consist of a concrete floor surrounded by a solid wall or fence and have self-closing doors of a size specified by the Fire Department. All enclosures to be constructed at grade level and have a level area adjacent to the trash enclosure .area to service these containers. 16. Applicant shall comply with all appropriate State and City requirements for the handicapped. 17. The applicant is hereby notified that the property is to be maintained free of any combustible trash, debris and weeds, until the time that actual construction commences. All existing structures shall be secured by having windows boarded up and doors sealed shut, or be demolished or removed from the property. Sect. 11.201 & 11.414, 1979 Ed. Uniform Fire Code. FIRE DEPARTMENT 18. Provide one hour separation between garage and warehouse. 19. File a "Declaration of Hazardous Materials" with the Fire Department. BUILDING DEPARTMENT 20. Doors into warehouse to be one hour and self-closing, self-latching. 21. Ventilation to be provided in chemical containment area. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FILE 4i S 88-08 SITE ADDRESS: 380 INDUSTRIAL ST. APPLICANT: VARRELMANN, R. PAGE 3. 22. Construction plans to show the footing. 23. Design for concrete wall against neighbors existing concrete block wall shall be shown in detail. 24. Electrical & gas meters shall be in separate enclosures. PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING 25. Obtain an excavation permit, post surety, and pay fees for the installation of a 5' wide sidewalk and a driveway approach 8' x 25' with 4' slopes on each end. RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL: SA 88-23 ITEM N0. 17 SITE ADDRESS: 389 E. CAMPBELL AVE. APPLICANT: CAMPBELL TRAVEL SERVICE PC MTG: 9-27-88 1. The presented sign is not well designed or architecturally compatible with the building. Proposed Findings For Approval of UP 88-06 The Planning Commission finds as follows: 1. The property at 256 Calado Avenue has been operating as a Large Family Day Care Home; 2. Conditional upon making the existing garage available for parking, the property provides two (2) covered parking spaces and three (3) additional parking spaces are available on the adjoining street. Given the relatively low traffic on the street, the available parking provides a safe and acceptable means of drop-off and pickup, and reasonable vehicular and pedestrian circulation. The parking provides for more than three (3) available parking spaces in addition to those required for residential use, including one (1) for each employee and two (2) for loading and unloading of children; 3. There is no evidence that would indicate that the noise generated by the Day Care operation in unreasonably offensive to the senses or obstructs the free use of neighboring properties so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of ~ such adjoining properties; 4. The Day Care Home complies with the regulations _ the State Fire Marshall; 5. No known day care center or other large family day care home is located within three hundred (300) feet of the applicants home; 6. The day care home is designed so that the normal residential surroundings are preserved and the integrity of the residential neighborhood is p-reserved; and the home is the principal residence of the applicant; 7. The home consists of 1,740 square feet, located on a 6,450 square foot lot, which provides adequate indoor living space and outd oor open space to meet the needs of the children. Based on the foregoing findings, the Commission further finds and concludes: a. operation of the use health, safety, peace, persons residing or w~ use, or be detrimental in the neighborhood or The establishment, maintenance, or applied for will not be detrimental to the morals, comfort or general welfare of irking in the neighborhood of such pro posed or injurious to property and improveme-__'s to the general welfare of the City. b. The proposed s i to i s adequate i n s ize and shape t o accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, landscaping and other development features required in order to integrate said use with uses in the surrounding area. c. The proposed site is adequately served by streets of sufficient capacity to carry the kind and quantity of traffic such use would generate. d. The proposed use is compatible with the uses in the area.